the buffy season six thread (WARNING SPOILERS!!)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
ok so i finally finished watching it last night. 'first' thoughts: wtf? good stuff: kittens, once more with feeling, the mental institution (esp the in-joke about the writing being shoddy in season six) the fact that the last episode was the third (maybe fourth) buffy episode ever to make me cry, the way they've left stuff at the end (although it would be way better if spike had been de-chipped).

bad stuff: most of it. magic=drug, rack, giles leaving, tara dying, riley, the doublemeat palace, warren etc as the big bad. spike + buffy didn't really ring true for me. the way the kittens never came back. tara dying. dawn. tara dying.

toby, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

should they have stopped at the end of season five? or was this the only way to go? if not, what should they have done? etc.

oh and having not read anything about buffy online for ages for fear of SPOILERS; what should i be reading? where's the best discussion? what about decent fanfic??

sarah to thread!

toby, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

In context of the plans for seven 7 - upbeat save-the-world year zero Buffy (they're calling it "season 1") I think season 6 makes perfect sense. Another 'big' season straight after season 5 would have been a bit repetitive.

The great/crappy ratio reminds me somewhat of Season 4 - without a really strong overarching narrative the show branches out more, and because of that inevitably hits a few false notes. Of course for me the only season that did consistently brilliant things from episode to episode was Season 3. That doesn't change the fact that it's my favourite show.

Tim, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm really torn about this season. There are some redeeming moments, but a lot of it was oh so very HORRID. Especially the magic = drugs bit. And the rape part. And...a lot of it, really. It became so afterschool special this season. I blame Marti Noxon.

Tara's dying was sad, but the way it has been overblown by the kitten jihad is a bit pathetic. They claim to be feminists, but they look more lame-o than Star Trek fans to get so hysterical about it all. Real riot grrls would just sneer at Joss Whedon and get on with writing their own show, instead continually crying about how unfair it is. This is not a popular opinion but it is mine.

Nicole, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Could someone explain the 'kitten jihad' to me?

Tim, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's become a sort of slang for psychotically angry Tara fans.

Nicole, Friday, 9 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tim: agreed on series 3. somehow series 6 seems like a necessary purging to me right now.

the thing the annoyed me about tara dying was that she was finally a central character and finally likeable; also it did seem excessively cruel given that she + willow had got back together (and surely willow's reaction could have been just the same without that reconciliation?).

toby, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the development of the Spike/Buffy "love story" was the best part of this season. Love Spike pining for Buffy, but when they finally got together, and Buffy kept sleeping with Spike and then declaring she had no feeling for him, this seemed to get a little tired. I'm interested to see what will happen with Spike in the next season. I like Spike! Is he really not British, I couldn't tell! I didn't like Willow turning all Psycho Willow, it's good I guess that they're looking for some development for her character, but I prefer quirky brainy Willow to magic addicted Willow. Tara dying sucks big time, and I have a funny feeling that Dawn was introduced in Season 5 as a way for the advertisers to try to hold on to their teen YM quotient. A couple "intellectual-ish" books were published last year on Buffy, I'd recommend those rather than Bulletin boards, etc. for smart writing on this series. Finally, hate to see the Buffster not on WB anymore.

Mary, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

b-but the 'intellectual' books on buffy were rub! or at least the bits i skim read, anyway...

toby, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Search out the website All Thing Philosophical In Buffy The Vampire Slayer - I can't be bothered finding the link for it though.

Tim, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Jeez, Tim. Google "all things buffy" et voila, and I don't even watch the damn thing. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Ned in my horrendously lazy state of mind even that's too much.

Thank you, though.

Tim, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

YEW and ME, all WE want to BE...yer welcome.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To make up for my slackness, I direct you all to read this - an excellent analysis of the relationship between human and vampire personalities. It needs to be updated however to take into account the large ramifications of the final few episodes of season six (ie. Willow, "bored now").

Tim, Saturday, 10 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"b-but the 'intellectual' books on buffy were rub! or at least the bits i skim read, anyway... "

Sorry! I didn't read them, I only read about them, and thought they could be mildly diverting...

There's been a lot of essays on salon.com lately about Buffy, oh, and Television Without Pity is a good site for funny entertaining synopsis on Buffy and many other shows...

Mary, Sunday, 11 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i just didn't like the whole healing power of manhood thing - jiles and xander, good christian carpenter,s aves the world and willow from the evil of pure owmanhood evil lesbianism that has sprung from her things at the bleeding loss of her loved one.

Queen G of the cheese and bacon rolls, Sunday, 11 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hmmm would just like to say that BUFFY BUFFY!!! i bought all of s.5 at a KNOCK DOWN BARGAIN PRICE at t'boot fair yesterday and watched 4 episodes! i have square eyes! i can't wait to see season 6! (though i know it will annoy the life out of me). i will be sad when tara dies.

katie, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

haha wolfram and hart got killed.

jel --, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

was this in ANGLE jel? i was a bit pissed, turned on the telly and there was drusilla saying "daddy's back" or somesuch cockernee dribble and then angle GOT ALL TOUGH and everyone went "COR!!" i didn't have the foggiest what was going on but it was hella cool.

katie, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, Darla is all vampy again, and wolfram and hart thought her and Drusilla (worst British accent ever) were going to go on a rampage and kill lots of innocents, but they ended up at W&H's party...Angle showed up, and he could've tried to save the lawyers but he just shut the doors and walked away, and D&D did the biting stuff! And Angle then sacked his lacky's.

jel --, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Then I turned over to Channel 5 and saw the end of the Black Mask starring Jet Li. It was great, and the deadpan dubbing was hilarious.

jel --, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

drusilla does indeed have the worst english accent ever, HANDS DOWN. i have not seen hardly any of season 2 buffy and am not looking forward to wanting to punch the screen every time she speaks!!

katie, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i printed out a reem (literally) of stuff from all things philosophical this morning = i have enough buffy to read for a while (though if anyone can recommend any fanfic...).

toby, Monday, 12 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
i thought this was an up and down series, but vgood overall, i liked how it seemed to run out of
steam on a couple occasions, but then the next episode totally redeemed and made it exciting again,

best episode was the buffy in mental institution, but the musical was surprisingly good too.

buffy ripping off warrens skin was shocking and good, spike was good still, but the on-off buffy-spike
thing did get tiring, i wanted him to stand up a bit more, he got a bit too wimpy

xander has got more annoying with each series, and i liked him at the beginning, but so
sanctimonious and pompous by now, i was glad when spike slept with anya, totally!

the magic=drug thing didnt really work for me, or perhaps it would have a little if it hadnt been
so overplayed, and the power to destroy the world thing at the end, i think that was too much,
overplayed again

im glad jonathan got away, i liked how they made him likeable, and at one point i wondered if
he was going to join the scoobies in some way, though of course then he would have been less likeable.

i think it was all good, but the goodness/giles/willow/magic/drug thing was a bit too wholesome

the mental institution one was so good though

onto season 7 for me now...

gareth (gareth), Friday, 12 March 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Tara dying was almost the most satisfying thing to happen in the whole series. If only they'd gotten rid of Dawn and Willow while they were at it.

adam (adam), Friday, 12 March 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

you are evil and wrong.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 13 March 2004 00:06 (twenty-one years ago)

What did you love about the mental institution one, G? I wasn't so fond of that one because it questioned the reality of the series in what I thought was a clichéd way--"oh, it was all just a dream"~well, not a dream in this case but an hallucination. I thought it damaged the show to insert that doubt when for so many years they had been successful in portraying the extraordinary--teenage vampire slayer--as believable. Then again, I didn't like Memento either. These thoughts of "is it real or is it just a dream?" don't do much for me. I thought the Silence episode was much more powerful. They go through the whole eposide in silence only to regain speech at the end and when they regain speech are not able to really say anything at all.

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 13 March 2004 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Those were two of my all-time favourite episodes. I loved the asylum one, especially the fact that after the apparent back to vampire slayer reality ending they inserted that last shot of her in the asylum, hopelessly lost. I didn't think one episode could really turn the whole six seasons into all a dream, so I didn't think they were risking the perceived reality of something we know isn't realism anyway.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 13 March 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

re: the asylum episode. well, yes, the "am i really here?" device is somewhat cliched, but the way it was handled was good i think, the way the ending was quite downbeat and depressing, and not really resolved

gareth (gareth), Saturday, 13 March 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

you are evil and wrong.

Tara and Dawn were both awful, awful characters: the homely Wiccan and the troubled teen, wtf? I got enough of that shit in high school. And dorky Willow was far superior to Wiccan Willow. I just found the whole witchy thing to be a really depressing attempt to appeal to the Tori Amos audience--it didn't seem natural. Angel seems to have had a much more natural evolution, cast- and character-wise and it's turned into the most well-done and satisfying show on television.

This all comes down to my No Wiccans = Good Television rule. There weren't any Wiccans on VIP, right? And VIP was awesome.

adam (adam), Saturday, 13 March 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

you may have a point, i dont recall any wiccans in Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads either

gareth (gareth), Saturday, 13 March 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I must have missed that one but WHEN IS VIP COMING OUT ON DVD??? I'm dyin' here.

adam (adam), Saturday, 13 March 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The show J's the S the episode after the memory loss one (#9, I think...). It's sad though, Joss thought of a lot better storylines for 6 & 7, but didn't have the money... bah.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Saturday, 13 March 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Although still worth watching till the end, of course. The rubbishing of Anya, Xander and Spike's chracters probably the show's worst problem in the last seasons, and, uh, the so-so storylines.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Saturday, 13 March 2004 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

The Happy Burger episode (monster in the fast food place) was the low-point of Buffy.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 13 March 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Spike got dicked over in the last two seasons of Buffy but this 5th season Angel is kind of making me understand why he's such a beloved character--the Spike/Angel interaction is priceless.

adam (adam), Saturday, 13 March 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

no, the low point of buffy was that awful early episode with the killer eggs. there were a lot of really annoying S4 episodes too, tara/willow was pretty much the only thing about that whole season (initiative, adam, riley) that DIDN'T drive me crazy. but they made up for it with the buffy-adam fight and the dream episode.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 14 March 2004 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

It's sad though, Joss thought of a lot better storylines for 6 & 7, but didn't have the money... bah.

such as?!

toby (tsg20), Sunday, 14 March 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

ok i just did this crazy thing where i watched seasons 5, 6, and 7 pretty much in a row, several episodes a night. some various thoughts:

i liked season 5 a lot more than i thought i would. particularly dawn, who i was really worried about--i thought her introduction was pretty brilliant and i ended up liking her character a lot. i think crucial to this is the death of joyce summers--giving dawn a really intense emotional experience to go through (and one that questioned her relationship with the other characters) gave her a lot more dimension.

season 6 was definitely pretty difficult in a lot of ways, but i loved how tortured and emotionally unhealthy everybody was. the end of the season was a brilliant brilliant turn--the reveal of willow as the villain was amazing (even if i wasn't so nuts about the magic/drugs stuff).


[SEASON 7 SPOILERS FOR ANYONE WHO HASN'T SEEN IT]:


season 7, which i finished last night, was a big disappointment. i liked that they took a lot of risks with it (like introducing 20 or so new characters, holy shit!) but i had a lot of problems as well.

one thing i've always really admired about buffy (and i guess by extension whedon, who i think is an amazing tv writer who usually understands the genre and medium he is working in so well) is its internal consistency: the show never forgets. in that one episode (season 3? 4? don't remember) when we see the "alternate universe" sunnydale, sans buffy, who's running the show? the master, of course, the big baddie from season 1.

in the case of season 7 i found the show got a lot more forgetful. there was a lot set up (like fake joyce telling dawn "buffy will choose someone else," a statement ambiguous enough that even though it was the first who said it you expected there to be some truth to it) that was never resolved. introducing caleb right at the end of the season was also a huge mistake; buffy had to deal with him right up until the second-last episode, leaving only one to wrap everything up! i thought the whole mystical-axe/"last suprise" thing was great in concept (the super-slayification of all the potentials) but why was the first defeated by a mysterious amulet that just came out of nowhere, unexplained? why have TWO magical deus ex machina plot devices in the same room? i was also pissed that they gave more time to the principal's wounds than onya's entire death scene! wtf? the angel drop-in was kinda funny but such a blatant guest spot that it was lame. the series ender had nowhere near the emotional impact of most of the regular season finales (like 2, 6, or 3 for instance).

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

People always have these "low points" and "jumped the shark" discussions about Buffy as if the WILL XANDER OR WILL XANDER NOT TURN INTO A FISH?? episode never happened. Add to this and J.D.'s mention of "Bad Eggs" "Inca Mummy Girl", "Some Assembly Required", "Reptile Boy" and "Ted" (and that's just season 2).

I don't know if the story to the Buffy PS2 game was seriously considered for the show but I much prefer it to season 7.

c. (synkro), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree. I also think Season 5 getsa lot of unfair slack (it's my favourite, next to 3, and the thing that addicted me to this sucker in the first place).

I'm not sure what in hell the writers found so damn amusing about Jonathan, but he diverted all the attention from Xander, therefore = dud. And, as I've mentioned elsewhere, the whole damn season seemed to take place at Buffy's house. It felt like one of those shows where the main cast member has left, but they were all still there. (Also, shame no Seth Green showing, but understandable.)

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

(x-pos)

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

P.S. Anything this good still on television that I'm missing? (I'm still waiting to catchup season 3 of Alias, and Sopranos/24/Gilmore/6 Feet were way off boil the last while. Dont talk to me about West Wing).

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

The fish episode was great! Cordelia talking to the fish! Xander in bathers and before he put on weight!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)

one thing i've always really admired about buffy... is its internal consistency: the show never forgets.

This will probably just show me up as the sad fanboy that I am, but S1ocki did you notice that the same actor plays both flashback-William's love interest Cecily and vengeance demon Halfrek? And that when Halfrek shows up during S6 she and Spike recognize each other and call each other by their human names?

pantalaimon (synkro), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

P.S. Anything this good still on television that I'm missing?

I watch the Homicide DVDs using my television. So that's kind of on TV. Aside from those and Angel and Bernie Mac no.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

pantalaimon: no, I didn't notice that at all! wow, nice catch!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

also, chuck:

I'm not sure what in hell the writers found so damn amusing about Jonathan, but he diverted all the attention from Xander, therefore = dud. And, as I've mentioned elsewhere, the whole damn season seemed to take place at Buffy's house. It felt like one of those shows where the main cast member has left, but they were all still there. (Also, shame no Seth Green showing, but understandable.)

(i assume you mean not jonathan but the other guy?) i found that guy pretty funny, but you're otm about the buffy's house stuff (if we're still talking season 7). it was so weird how the early stuff really set the high school up as the central location--and so perfectly, it made so much sense to return there for the final season--and then it's all living room/backyard/basement.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm getting the chronology confused now--but I agree that the house as center become too much, with Tara and Willow sharing a room there, and Dawn there of course, it all somehow became that they were living out this very bourgeois fantasy--but it was lacking an adult center. Which might have been what the show was trying to get across, but it seemed very lonely living in that house, with Joyce gone.

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)

P.S. Anything this good still on television that I'm missing?

HBO and USA are the only networks making good, creative television, even their duds (K Street ... ) are miles better than the crap the other networks hide behind.

I think a lot of Buffy fans would dig Wonderfalls, on FOX.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I watch the Homicide DVDs using my television.

Just wait until The Wire is on DVD - it's even better ...

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I've heard that. The only B*t T*rrents I ever see are like 6 gigs though. Is there a similarity beyond the Baltimore thing*? (off to find Wire threads)

* The Baltimore thing is like lagniappe with Homicide--Det. Howard's seriously Maryland accent is very nostalgia-inducing.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I still call it "Ballmer" because of her! People who come from there think I'm a jackass.

David Simon, who wrote the original Homicide book (a true crime classic), co-created the show, and you see a lot of secondary actors crop up. But more importantly, The Wire feels like the show that Homicide could have been with no commercial restraints. Everything gets pushed farther, like showing instead of telling, avoiding easy exposition, forcing the audience to make its mind up about the characters and get immersed in what's going on. It has a lot of the authenticity, but the grey moral areas actually make Homicide look sentimental - it's hard to watch Ned Beatty get on Richard Belzer's ass about avenging the dead after you watch the detectives on the Wire dodge every case they can to keep their numbers up. I'm a huge fan of Homicide, and it definitely stands the test of time, but it's exciting to see the Wire as something that can take all those themes and ideas several steps farther.

Also interesting, the two crime writers who are closest to what the Wire's doing - Richard Price (Clockers, which is a heavy influence on the first season) and Dennis Lehane (Mystic River) - both signed on to write episodes in the next season.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry this is off-topic. I'm a gigantic Buffy and Angel fan, too - I think end to end, I actually prefer Angel. I don't know how I reconcile the gritty "people talking shit at each other in beat-up cars" crime shows with the gothic vampire soap operas.

Except that all those shows have people who, whether or not they say it, torture themselves over morality and God? I'll have to think about it.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I've only gotten to watch Angel lately (S1-3, parts of S4 and S5 thus far), but I prefer it to Buffy S4 and after.

All the 'dud' episodes mentioned from S2 are great - the fish and the mummy and everything. Did the people who dislike them come to the show later on?

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 06:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I think if you started watching in, say, season five, most of those episodes would seem disproportionately silly. They were silly to begin with of course, but when they were made darkness and pathos weren't quite so fully entrenched in the show's self-consciousness.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

[SEASON 7 SPOILER START]

The exact provenance of the amulet at the end (and the possibility that it was meant to be Angel instead of Spike) is a question that's getting at least lip service on recent episodes of Angel.

[SEASON 7 SPOILER END]

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)

They had a lot of trouble balancing the silly with the serious in the last years of Buffy. Season 1 was pretty silly from start to finish, and in a good way; the best part of Season 2 was how startling some of the shifts were, from "Lie to Me" to the whole Angelus storyline. It was like, "Holy shit, I thought this was supposed to be a stupid show! And it's not!" Later, they seemed to take that for granted.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The silly episodes of seasons 1-3 of Buffy remind me of really bad Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes and remain entirely unwatchable.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

well it's interesting, you did see a lot of one-offs in the early days which makes sense as it was a pretty new show and still finding it's feet (was only season 3, really, when even the one-offs would also, at least tangentially, advance the season's major arc as well).

that said, however, it's pretty amazing to me that this show which had the amazing virtue of constantly evolving, of always being in flux--plotwise, characterwise, etc--that you can still go back to season 1 or 2 and find it so developed already, the same show basically in tone, logic, and sense of humour.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Milo I didn't start watching regularly until season 3, so that might be it. I actually like those silly episodes too, I just have a hard time squaring love for them with wholesale dismissal of the series post-high school. Is it the jarring shifts in those early seasons, like Chris mentioned, that you like so much? Because I really like how the writing got tighter in the later seasons and that stuff became more a part of the major story arcs. For example, Willow threatening to destroy the world at the end of S6 is totally silly, but but also heartbreaking and a great exaggerated reversal of her character; I think it nails the all-consuming and almost hyperbolical nature of grief quite well. The Xander fish episode on the other hand just seems to be marking time, the calm before the storm at the end of S2. As the show toned down the really obvious silliness, and incorporated it better, I think a lot of people started to take it *too* seriously, and miss the fact that it's still supposed to be there in later seasons, just transmuted in a way (I agree that the Doublemeat Palace episode was crap and the drugs/magic thing could've been a lot better, though the latter was really only 2 or 3 episodes).

c. (synkro), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Re above, yeah, I think I meant Andrew.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

While we're complaining, Giles leaving was a bit of a bummer too. I don't know if it's me, but most of the leads (except poss. Alyson Hannigan) seem to become worse actors as the series wore on. SMG looked pretty PO'd for most of S7, perhaps marking time till the next CGI dog movie.

On a +ve side, I thought S5 totally rocked, I can't understand the problem.

Also: seeing as we're obviously all Whedon nerds here (nothing wrong with that), anyone catch -- and can recommend -- Firefly?

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

firefly did not look very good to me.

and yeah, giles leaving was a major blow (his return in the s6 finale was SO WICKED tho)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't care for Firefly at all, it took the concept of a space western far too literally and except for Adam Baldwin none of the characters or actors were very compelling.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Firefly was excellent. For most of the things I like about Whedon - humor, characters and relationships, etc. - it was often better than Angel or Buffy.

Better action, too - the vampire/demon v. Angel/Buffy fights are boring. Nothing interesting happens, rarely is a plot point advanced, none of the main characters are endangered (unless it's a season finale). Firefly had some sense of placing the characters in danger (if not usually fatal).

S5 and S6 weren't complete losses - but after S3 nothing was handled well overall. The acting got worse, entire episodes would be spent around nothing happening (S7 was the worst). The early seasons found middle ground between moving too fast and just pissing away time. And I guess the pace was meant to provide more room for character development (or whatever), but most of the time the characters felt more natural moving fast and doing some give-and-take, you didn't need big pauses and spaces for them (and the acting wasn't up to that anyway). (Best part of S7 - the vampire psych major.)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post - the 'too far' was the point, though. "Haha, Star Trek was a space western? Fine then! We'll actually make it the Old West."

The weakest link was Dr. and Willow-as-mechanic's relationship.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

That may have been the point, but it felt like the hokiest of Star Trek spinoffs.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

the dude on it didn't look so great either

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"Best part of S7 - the vampire psych major" OTM. I read that Joss wrote that entire bit, although he's not credited.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Really? It seemed like the anti-Trek to me (I can't stand most Star Trek except for DS9, I hate Star Wars).

Morally conflicted, not very techie at all, actually fighting against the 'Federation', nothing was clean, the relationships had some dimension to them.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

The vampire psych major turns up on an unaired episode of Firefly.

(Really, anyone who likes Whedon should give the DVDs a chance. I didn't care much for the show when it aired, but in the correct running order and with some extra episodes it gets better)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

most of the time the characters felt more natural moving fast and doing some give-and-take, you didn't need big pauses and spaces for them (and the acting wasn't up to that anyway).

I guess this is where we part ways because I think Buffy was excellent at wringing all sorts of unexpected stuff from very ham-handed acting in overly grand straight-faced melodramatic situations. I like that conflict, whereas trading one liners with killer ventriloquist's dummies is fun but not at all compelling to watch more than once.

It would help if you gave examples of "not much happening." Would you consider the memory loss episode from S6 to be one of these? It didn't advance the plot much (at least not until the last few minutes, which were preordained anyway), but this stasis was the whole point: a last chance to reimagine new and intense connections between the characters, to bump up the poignancy of their partings. I'm trying to imagine an episode from the first two seasons which mixed humor and sadness as well as this, and I can't: it's always either/or.

c. (synkro), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

imagine remember

c. (synkro), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 22:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I completely agree that Firefly's better in the correct order. It didn't suck me in until the 2-hour pilot - which was the last thing that FOX aired.

I still think that pampering the space hooker was a cop-out, though. Whedon can't show a woman being abused or denigrated - which is great, and sorely missed! - so he sets up the obligatory frontier hooker as a trained professional who chooses her clients, knows how to fight, lives in geisha-like luxury and doesn't catch diseases. Lame.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I've really put most of the last seasons of Buffy out of my memory. What comes to mind, though, are the episodes with Spike in the school-dungeon or one of the early slayer-training episodes (where they're in kind of a construction-project thing with banks of lighting). The shows would finish where earlier episodes would have been halfway or 2/3 through - very anti-climactic.

Bringing back Faith gave the series some kick at the end, the show really hurt from Buffy's dead-fish routine (and being a terrible actress).

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

!???!?!?!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate Sarah Michelle Gellar with a fiery passion but, I think in the role of Buffy that she is fabulous. I just can't get with the S2 and S3 love, either. There are some wonderful isolated episodes, like Passion and Innocence, but in general I think both of those seasons were terribly underwritten and ham-handed. S5 is nearly perfect in my estimation, and S4 is uneven but usually incredibly funny or wonderfully ambitious (Hush, Restless, etc.). S6 had its problems, but I loved that it was basically a whole season that completely dismantled the idea of Buffy as hero. Everyone unraveled. S7 was deeply flawed, it definitely suffered from a visibly lower budget (everything taking place in the house, etc.) and the incredibly annoying potential slayers (who weren't annoying as a plot device but just as actresses). But even then I prefer it to S2 and S3 and it got to me more than either of those ever could.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"birthday" yo!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I can understand you feeling that way about season 2 Mel but I'm very surprised you wouldn't love season 3!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Season 3 is my second least favorite after 1! Graduation Day was an incredibly disappointing denouement to the season and Faith's transformation was so incredibly underwritten. Some of the stuff with her and the mayor was nice, but that was about it. The whole Xander-Willow thing was dull dull dull, and I'm having trouble even remembering any of the other plot points.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)

say what????!!!! the faith stuff is the show's best plot arc ever!!!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

He's right, you know.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't much care about Faith until she was brought back in S4 of Buffy and s1 of Angel.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

S5
S6
S4
S7
S2
S3
S1

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

S3
S2
S1
S5
S4
S6
S7

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

My best to worst:

Angel 4 (the tightest story arc of 'em all - the very first and last scenes match! How can you beat that?)
Buffy 2
Angel 2
Buffy 3
Buffy 1 (funny)
Angel 3 (great story, some flawed execution)
Buffy 4
Angel 5 (assuming it stays as good as it just became)
Buffy 5
Angel 1 (the last third saves it)
Buffy 6
Buffy 7 (inexcusable)

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate Faith.

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

you WHAT??>>>>!>@>!@jki23jki2j49i3294921932932939233121

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

OK BEST VILLAINS

faith/mayor
angel/spike/drusilla
willow
the first (with reservations)
glory
master
adam

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Push the Master ahead of Willow and drop the first to the bottom and I'm right there with you.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

well then you're not with me at all!

also what is good at all about the master?

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

and that fucking kid!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought the First was a good villain but what I could never understand is why it didn't exploit its ability to appear as Buffy by doing the ol' switcheroo on the Scooby Gang.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I KNOW!!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:37 (twenty-one years ago)

they kind of set that up with the dead potential girl but then he just goes and tries to convince people to do stuff!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree with s1ocki's list except that i'd switch glory and the first and put the troika at #2.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)

how come i forgot about the troika? warren was a pretty good creepy villain, it was good for them to try a human villain (and the switcheroo at the end of that season was amazing)

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Milo as OTM as anything ever. (except that the best seasons list should start 2,1,3...., not 3,2,1....) Anyone who hates the early seasons, and the episodes with the ventriloquist dummy or the mind-control eggs, hates fun.

The Yellow Kid, Wednesday, 17 March 2004 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

But it's not fun! The early season standalone eps weren't fun, they were terribly terribly serious but horribly ridiculous!

They didn't start getting standalone right until maybe late 3 (with the Vamp Willow ep).

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Earlier seasons I think just looked cooler because they were shot in 16mm.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

The Troika were terrible.

The Master wasn't that great unto himself, but the way he was just a blank slate/setup for the adventures was good - and it led up to the S2 opener (Torturer Buffy, yay).

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

The troika were great! Inept human types usually given short shrift in past seasons (Andrew was actually supposed to be Tucker from The Prom) whose plans were always thwarted by Buffy try to get petty revenge/world dominance, fail pathetically, become more angry at their impotence, and one ends up trying to kill Buffy in the simplest way possible...with a gun. Warren in a lot of ways was the scariest Buffy villain ever. The truest evil that they faced, because he wasn't truly evil. He was pathetic.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

But they weren't funny or scary, they were just goofy. That goofiness might be part of my problem with the later seasons - things got played with a wink. Too much self-awareness? "Oh, those wacky nerds!"

The eternal-Mayor was goofy, but that plot got played with a straight face.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

It got played with a straight face but it didn't feel very serious. The threat of casualty didn't seem to be there.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

But they weren't funny or scary, they were just goofy.

I think the episode where Warren raped and killed his ex-girlfriend was extremely creepy and disturbing -- it was hard to view the trio as goofy or harmless after that.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

But the threat of casualty is never there. Even when they 'killed' Buffy, you knew she was coming back.

(Poss. changes with Fred in new Angel?)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the episode where Warren raped and killed his ex-girlfriend was extremely creepy and disturbing -- it was hard to view the trio as goofy or harmless after that.
Yeah, completely.

But the threat of casualty is never there. Even when they 'killed' Buffy, you knew she was coming back.
(Poss. changes with Fred in new Angel?)

But it wasn't treated lightly when she came back, and 6 as a whole was about the consequences that action had on her psyche... And a lot of character have never come back... Jenny Calendar, Joyce, Tara...

I like the new twist with Fred, some say Illyria cheapens her death, but I don't think it does... As a whole, tv shows let a character's death be completely dealt with within a few episodes, and nobody shows signs of grief after an episode or two. But her still being there is just going to be like a continual raw wound for everyone.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone who hates the early seasons, and the episodes with the ventriloquist dummy or the mind-control eggs, hates fun.

Dude, I said it was fun! I like that conflict, whereas trading one liners with killer ventriloquist's dummies is fun but not at all compelling to watch more than once.

See! Really, I like fun! OTM! FAP! ILX cliches a-go-go!

c. (synkro), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

The troika were brilliant and funny; the whole point of them I thought was to see the disturbing creepiness through the goofiness, how trivial obsessions can mask deeper, more fucked up ones, and that underdogs don't deserve a free moral pass, no matter how much shit they've had inflicted on them. I also liked how long it took us (or was it just me?) to realize they were really going to be the villains that year, it was very unexpected and right in line with the "oh, grow up" theme from S6.

c. (synkro), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't necessarily disagree with the deeper issues stuff - but they weren't strong enough as characters or plotlines to get through the goofiness. I can only take one so many "yeah, so they're Star Trek geeks!" setup.

The first seasons were strong because it worked as a superficial show but also on that deeper level. Even the throwaway episodes from S2/3 had something that advanced the characters or their relationships.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)

c. OTM

Melissa W (Melissa W), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the new twist with Fred, some say Illyria cheapens her death, but I don't think it does... As a whole, tv shows let a character's death be completely dealt with within a few episodes, and nobody shows signs of grief after an episode or two. But her still being there is just going to be like a continual raw wound for everyone.

I'm completely enthralled by how creepy and new this Illyria character is, and I'm bummed that they only have about six more episodes to feature her. The first half of the season included so many one-off, lighthearted episodes that they didn't have a chance to properly demonstrate how corrupted the Angel crew became. So it seems like they've piled it all on in the last few weeks - but I'm still enjoying it.

Dig those eyes: http://savetherobot.com/pfwork/evilfred.jpg

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey! Some of us haven't watched Angel 5 yet, so watch it wid dem spoilers!

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

BTW I don't think it's the lameness/unlameness of the villains that mattered (there were a buncha gret episodes with Adam in), it's just the writing got worse. You knew if it wasn't a Jane Espenson or Joss episode, it was basically going to suck.

Also, Hannigan was a terrible actress as Evil Willow, and that whole Xander face-off was a bit ridick.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Buffy was unique in that it had four very funny women who didn't have a lot of range outside of comedy, which is reason enough alone for me to love it. I guess my interpretation of Hannigan's performance as Evil Willow was just that Willow wouldn't be very good at being evil! (ie the interest is more to do with the perversion of her character rather than a really terrifying convincing depiction of Evil Itself.)

c. (synkro), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
I watched the whole season over the past two days. What a fun time.

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 25 November 2005 00:51 (nineteen years ago)

Illyria will be in the Spike movie!

Ian in Brooklyn, Friday, 25 November 2005 04:10 (nineteen years ago)

Marti Noxon said recently that Joss is tossing around the idea of doing direct-to-video installments of Buffy, using characters like Spike, Angel, etc in each. Doubtful that Alyson Hannigan & SMG would be on board, but still, a cool idea...

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 November 2005 05:42 (nineteen years ago)

i wld be worried about quality but still kind of exciting.

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 25 November 2005 05:52 (nineteen years ago)

Angel's new series (with Zooey Descanel's sister) got picked up for a full season or renewed or something - would he be in for those?

Once you've eliminated Willow, Buffy and Angel (plus Anya's dead), the characters available for new shows are pretty thin - too much air time for Jonathan. The prospective Giles show sounded interesting, but I guess that's off as well.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 25 November 2005 05:58 (nineteen years ago)

i am rewatching season 5 now. I am happier with that than the prospect of new ones devoid of most of the characters.

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 25 November 2005 06:05 (nineteen years ago)

My fave Angel ep is the one with the abused, insane slayer whose rescued by Andrew and the Slayer army or what-have-you.

*That* would be the way to go. A bunch of cool, alienated cranky Slayers with Andrew in the inept lead.

(My understanding is that in the new Buffy comix, she and the Immortal traipse about Italy fighting whatever.)

Ian in Brooklyn, Friday, 25 November 2005 06:06 (nineteen years ago)

are the comix any good?

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 25 November 2005 06:08 (nineteen years ago)

The Firefly/Serenity comics were awful, if the writers/artists are connected.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Friday, 25 November 2005 06:10 (nineteen years ago)

I'm glad this thread has been revived, as I have a Whedon question:

I haven't seen either Firefly or Serenity, but am planning both. Does it matter which order I view them in? Should I ensure that I see Firefly before going to watch Serenity at the pictures?

Madeleine (Madeleine), Friday, 25 November 2005 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

i prefer Sailor Moon.

g-spot (g-kit), Friday, 25 November 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago)

You don't have to see Firefly before you watch Serenity, but certain moments in the move might have more emotional impact if you've watched the series beforehand.

Greig (treefell), Friday, 25 November 2005 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know about the film; but the series is AWESOME. I recommend it highly.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Friday, 25 November 2005 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

Thank you. I am adding the series to my amazon rental list as we speak.

M (Madeleine), Friday, 25 November 2005 12:48 (nineteen years ago)

I always mean to get round to watching the season of firefly but end up re-watching seasons of buffy instead. I think i will try it next as i am close to finishing off my re-run of season five. Amazon rental scares me.

jeffrey (johnson), Friday, 25 November 2005 17:37 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

Wait, so ... after the resurrection of Buffy, did they ever bother trying to explain how she became Dawn's guardian again? The protective services lady is all up in her business but never notes "being deceased" as a reason she might be considered an unfit mother.

nabisco, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)

Nobody outside the gang knew Buffy was dead, right? A robot took her place.

milo z, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, that's right. the school officials never knew she was dead.

horseshoe, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:11 (seventeen years ago)

but there's some anxiety about Dawn maybe being sent away to Mr. Summers during season 6, I think?

horseshoe, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:12 (seventeen years ago)

Oh, right. BUT: she had a freaking headstone!

nabisco, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:12 (seventeen years ago)

a SECRET headstone. sniff. "Buffy Summers. She saved the world. A lot."

horseshoe, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:16 (seventeen years ago)

You people have an answer for everything, don't you.

nabisco, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:18 (seventeen years ago)

no, you're right, it's a little sloppy.

horseshoe, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:18 (seventeen years ago)

Eh, not that bad -- I'd say it's a pretty excellent job of rapidly reviving a show that you'd previously closed out with the death of the main character! The Buffybot was one hell of a useful plot device.

nabisco, Friday, 11 January 2008 22:24 (seventeen years ago)

WARNING SPOILERS

this show was really bad.

31g, Friday, 11 January 2008 23:24 (seventeen years ago)

^ So few words, so much RONG.

rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 01:21 (seventeen years ago)

Seriously. rogermexico OTM.

Melissa W, Saturday, 12 January 2008 01:24 (seventeen years ago)

i haven't seen any buffy in almost two years and i'm afraid to watch it again for fear it might suck.

J.D., Saturday, 12 January 2008 02:54 (seventeen years ago)

"I thought the First was a good villain but what I could never understand is why it didn't exploit its ability to appear as Buffy by doing the ol' switcheroo on the Scooby Gang."

Still wondering this. Still one of the biggest so-big-a-missed-opportunity-it-actually-forms-a-gaping-hole-of-plot-inconsistency thingies this show ever had.

Tim F, Saturday, 12 January 2008 03:17 (seventeen years ago)

Yes - that was definitely a bizarre miss. I haven't seen any Buffy in two years either, and the memory of seasons 6 and 7 doesn't make me want to - but on the other hand my sister was listing her top 10 Buffy episodes the other day for work reasons, and discussing those totally made me want to start again at the beginning. I really hope it doesn't all suck 2nd/3rd time around.

toby, Saturday, 12 January 2008 03:41 (seventeen years ago)

I'm "watching" season 8... a couple of week episodes, but all in all no complaints.

rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 03:46 (seventeen years ago)

my sister was listing her top 10 Buffy episodes the other day for work reasons

!

what does sis do that this is her work?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 January 2008 05:37 (seventeen years ago)

Season 8 is... eh, I just don't get comic books.

milo z, Saturday, 12 January 2008 05:56 (seventeen years ago)

I read the first graphic novel of Season 8 over Thanksgiving and remember almost nothing of it all. It was underwhelming. I don't think it is comic books (I love Y: The Last Man, for example); I just don't think Buffy works as well in a comic book format. (By "Buffy," I mean the concept, the characters, the story... it just doesn't seem to gel.)

As for season 6, it had a lot of ups and downs; of course I love Once More, With Feeling and I enjoyed all the Buffy/Spike drama. I think my favorite episode of the season is the one where Buffy becomes invisible.

Sara R-C, Saturday, 12 January 2008 06:10 (seventeen years ago)

i haven't watched it at all since it ended, but i figure i'll buy it one of these days. (yes i know one doesn't have buy things anymore but i'm sorry i want to buy a buffy box set thank you.) i'm not worried about how it'll hold up, it was classic from the start.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 12 January 2008 08:09 (seventeen years ago)

what does sis do that this is her work?

She works for a major internet-related company. I think this was something of a sideline to her main work, something to do with a new social-networking site that one of her colleagues is responsible for.

toby, Saturday, 12 January 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)

um yeah, i watch buffy constantly. it totally holds up.

horseshoe, Saturday, 12 January 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)

what i want to know is why, when they made such a big deal of a new slayer being called when the old slayer died--even to the point that that happened when buffy died for like 5 seconds--why no one new showed up when buffy died for like 6 months!! who was slaying??

s1ocki, Saturday, 12 January 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)

Perhaps there was a new one called, maybe she just had better things to do than move to Sunnydale to hang out with Buffy + friends (there are other hellmouths and weird things in the world). Either that or there is still a single line of slayers that goes Buffy - Kendra - Faith, and now it's waiting for Faith to die and Buffy isn't really a part of it anymore.

I've just seen series 7 (which I didn't like much originally) again after not watching any for a few years, and it was pretty enjoyable and a lot better than I had remembered, I'm thinking about starting on the others again too.

limón, Saturday, 12 January 2008 17:55 (seventeen years ago)

there is still a single line of slayers that goes Buffy - Kendra - Faith, and now it's waiting for Faith to die and Buffy isn't really a part of it anymore.

this is my explanation for s1ocki's question. then everything gets all weird with all the girls are slayers now in season 7, but i guess that's the point.

horseshoe, Saturday, 12 January 2008 17:56 (seventeen years ago)

ya i hear that it just seemed to really SUGGEST that another slayer was gonna show and i was let down when that didnt happen.

s1ocki, Saturday, 12 January 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)

man buffy box set down to $130 bucks NEW. i am very close to buying this.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 12 January 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)

i'm not worried about how it'll hold up, it was classic from the start.

Once it hit its stride it was the best show on television for a good three years, but I gotta warn you, Season One is shaky. Still finding its feat in terms of theme, character, and tone, and the fx are sub-Doctor Who.

OLD Doctor Who.

From Season Two on though, just impossibly grebt.

rogermexico., Saturday, 12 January 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i guess i had the advantage of discovering it in the 2nd season, so when i saw the 1st season in reruns i was already well disposed toward it.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 12 January 2008 20:36 (seventeen years ago)

season 1 was short anyway so i wouldnt sweat it

s1ocki, Saturday, 12 January 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.