2012: Obama's America - General Post Election/US Politics Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Jumping off from here:
The Choice of a New Denigration: the US Election Day 2012 Thread

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

this surprised many

Gukbe, Friday, 9 November 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

haha

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

so, the social cataclysm that conservatives predicted would happen in the last four years... that's going to happen in the next four, now, right?

real men have been preparing manly dishes for centuries (elmo argonaut), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

can't decide if i'm annoyed by fork's boring thread title or relieved that he didn't try out a pun

all mods con (k3vin k.), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

when will it be legal to start up my all-gay satanic daycare center?

real men have been preparing manly dishes for centuries (elmo argonaut), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

should've worked Butterschotts into the thread title somehow

xp

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

i know this is the post-election thread but these guys -

http://www.workingamerica.org/

did incredible work for the obama campaign, they deserve some in-thread big ups

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 9 November 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/09/opinion/krugman-lets-not-make-a-deal.html

This seems to me the new left-wing consensus and it makes a lot of sense to me. Tax break repeal for wealthy, no cuts to social services, or we go over the cliff. And if we do go over the cliff, reintroduce the tax breaks + payroll vacation for the middle class and dare House Republicans to not pass them. I think it's really brilliant tbh. I don't ever write letters to the WH (tho I write letters to my asshole local Republicans all the time) but I wrote them today to push them to follow this strategy.

Mordy, Friday, 9 November 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago)

someone please fix the thread title

iatee, Friday, 9 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

this thousand year long election cycle made me forget how much I fucking hate john boehner

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 9 November 2012 21:12 (twelve years ago)

So...Petraeus.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 9 November 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

how can you hate an oompa-loompa

xp

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 November 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

Haha:

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/weekly_standard_republicans_must_play_white_identity_politics_better_next_time/

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Friday, 9 November 2012 21:36 (twelve years ago)

I enjoy these silly things far more than I should (sorry if it was posted on the previous thread).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLIJc7YE_jw

clemenza, Friday, 9 November 2012 21:38 (twelve years ago)

It's still a pun if it's just a number-pun!

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 9 November 2012 21:43 (twelve years ago)

He BETRAYED US alright

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 November 2012 21:43 (twelve years ago)

Some kid just zipped by on his bike chanting ”Obama won!” Then he mocked Mitt as ” Romney noodle.”

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 November 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago)

probably thought u were mad cuz u white

all mods con (k3vin k.), Friday, 9 November 2012 23:25 (twelve years ago)

So: what's the over/under on whether a Grand Bargain is struck by Christmas?

Raymond Cummings, Friday, 9 November 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

xpost Wasn't chanting at me or in any particular direction, he was just generally chanting with pride and happiness.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 9 November 2012 23:28 (twelve years ago)

I kind of agree with Krugman, but man.

Raymond Cummings, Friday, 9 November 2012 23:34 (twelve years ago)

no grand bargain i hope

Mordy, Friday, 9 November 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago)

some dude (not that one) down the block has had his windows plastered with homemade 'fire obama the liar'/'i don't believe the msm' etc. signs. they are written out in the same font that calvin's bully moe used to speak in.

anyway, where can i find an enormous poster of obamacellphonesmirk.jpg?

mookieproof, Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:02 (twelve years ago)

yeah i'm not one to put too much faith in dems standing ground, esp congressional dems, but they did manage to resist watering down defense cuts when EVERYONE (and obv republicans, probably why they agreed to it in first place) assumed they would buckle and w/ no imminent election and a triumphant moment and the wind at their back i'd hope they'd be even more aggressive. whatever grand bargin does emerge it'll be nowhere near as favorable to gop as what was on the table in aug 2011, thank god.

balls, Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:26 (twelve years ago)

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md8gabRTEH1qltl50o1_500.jpg

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:30 (twelve years ago)

haha

balls, Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:39 (twelve years ago)

this guy hosts a radio show:
https://www.facebook.com/roger.fredinburg/posts/4188394302242

teeny, Saturday, 10 November 2012 00:54 (twelve years ago)

Nice

I kinda wanna know who this guy is so I can friend him

Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:34 (twelve years ago)

A big reason to avoid Papa John's.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:45 (twelve years ago)

So what is the response to this? Conservative guy on my fb posted the story about the Georgia guy and was all "See what happens when you elect Obama"

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:48 (twelve years ago)

Modify legislation so that businesses that transform full time into part time jobs to evade the mandate get fined.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:52 (twelve years ago)

Do we have links/articles about how all of this works? I thought there were tax break proposals for small businesses to make up for Obamacare costs?

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:53 (twelve years ago)

But that's the rub: Papa John's isn't a small business.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 01:55 (twelve years ago)

oh yeah, for Papa John's, but what about these other bozos, like that guy in Georgia who fired staff that he suspected of voting for Obama to get down to under 50 employees?

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:01 (twelve years ago)

The guy who runs the coal mine?

Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:04 (twelve years ago)

The story on that Georgia guy -- the radio show caller? -- omitted his name and occupation.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:06 (twelve years ago)

Yeah. Not the coal mine guy, the guy who omitted his name and occupation.

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:14 (twelve years ago)

kinda lol but mostly sad that employers are using this as an excuse to pull some walmart shit

a man d'Balmer (some dude), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:19 (twelve years ago)

http://nymag.com/news/politics/elections-2012/obama-romney-economic-plans-2012-10/index2.html

Here is how it will happen. On the morning of November 7, a reelected President Obama will do … nothing. For the next 53 days, nothing. And then, on January 1, 2013, we will all awake to a different, substantially more liberal country. The Bush tax cuts will have disappeared, restoring Clinton-era tax rates and flooding government coffers with revenue to fund its current operations for years to come. The military will be facing dire budget cuts that shake the military-industrial complex to its core. It will be a real-world approximation of the old liberal bumper-sticker fantasy in which schools have all the money they require and the Pentagon needs to hold a bake sale.

All this can come to pass because, while Obama has spent the last two years surrendering short-term policy concessions, he has been quietly hoarding a fortune in the equivalent of a political trust fund that comes due on the first of the year. At that point, he will reside in a political world he finds at most mildly uncomfortable and the Republicans consider a hellish dystopia. Then he’ll be ready to make a deal.

Leading up to the New Year, there will be a concerted effort to preempt this policy shift, by bringing the two parties together to consummate a version of the endlessly touted (but little-understood) Bowles-Simpson agreement that GOP House members rejected. This is already under way, and is being described in the press as a noble bipartisan effort to avoid something terrible. But it is more accurately understood to be a conservative attempt to avoid a massive shift in leverage in Obama’s favor. Some Democrats get this. (Charles Schumer is one of the few willing to take a hard-ass line against Bowles-Simpson). I also believe that, despite his silence on the matter, Obama gets it, too.

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago)

So the pizza will no doubt have that 14 cent increase and now he's cutting hours too? Sounds like PJ shareholders are gonna have one hell of a fiscal year!

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago)

That's lovely enough to get us liberals masturbating but we righly mocked Peggy Noonan for believing in signs and signals and vibrations.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago)

on the other hand David Brooks understood the consequences of a suddenly recalcitrant Obama in today's NPR segment. If I were a Democrat, he said, I'd let the tax cuts expire too -- suddenly the government will have all the revenue it needs.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:41 (twelve years ago)

it's a really great idea and makes total sense for obama for pursue. if you read further chait lays out the case in even more compelling detail. obv i'm not totally convinced, i wasn't sure obama would win until returns came in for florida, but it seems very reasonable and maybe stands an okay chance of happening??

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:43 (twelve years ago)

But if Obama allows taxes to go up, he'll never be elected again! Oh, wait. I mean, whoever runs as a Republican next election will campaign on lowering taxes, plus constricting social freedoms! Oh, wait. That already happens.

So, yeah, let's go over this fiscal bump and see what happens. Maybe will our military budget morally wounded, Iran will finally spring its trap and invade!

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:48 (twelve years ago)

Like Chait admits at the end, we have to believe Obama could summon every ounce of his everybody-chill-the-fuck-out side to resist a unanimous howl of protest from both parties, editorial writers, Beltway commentariat, donors, and potential '16 nominees if he lets those cuts expire.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:51 (twelve years ago)

....and I don't believe it.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:51 (twelve years ago)

our military is so big at this point that even w/ the spending cuts iran is no threat to the united states. the only threats that iran represents (nuclear weapons, regional hegemony, control of the strait of hormuz) we can either handle already, or no amount of military spending can impact.

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:52 (twelve years ago)

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRzulF_7kHz20ez8ZXcUeZGoRD77xg0dgJ2IZhO0lXl75yXptPI

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:53 (twelve years ago)

Also, I was kidding about Iran.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:53 (twelve years ago)

It makes more and more sense to me. Satraps from both parties understand the truth: the federal government will be awash in revenue if those cuts expire. That's what scares Boehner, Cantor, and Ryan to death. But these people count on Obama's unwillingness to resist national bipartisan outrage -- he blinked in summer '10, didn't he?

There's also Wall Street. Obama would have to weather a massive one- or two-day drop (maybe longer!) in the Dow, comparable to what happened several times in '08. To survive this would require every one of his talents.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:56 (twelve years ago)

we can even ameliorate the cliff before it hits, or retroactively, by re-proposing tax cuts for the middle class, even offering a bill to increase military spending (just not to previous levels). make the consequences explicit - republicans can shoot down a middle class tax cut bill bc it takes away their leverage on the sequester, but then they'll be publically rejecting middle class tax cuts. good luck to them making the case to america that they're pro tax cuts, but only for the wealthy.

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:58 (twelve years ago)

yeah cuts expiring is best-case scenario imho. I'd like to see it, and it might happen, but I wouldn't put it as the likeliest outcome. can/road etc.

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:02 (twelve years ago)

If the White House picks up Chait's vibrations and intimations (who knows -- he might be offering the White House's own battle plan as a trial balloon), and Obama takes this chance, it would be the greatest act of political courage in our lifetimes. We would have reduced the deficit and suddenly strengthened Medicare, Social Security, and the Affordable Care Act.

OK I'll stop.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:02 (twelve years ago)

Krugman wrote about the same thing today, and Yglesias a week ago. This idea has been going around (I first heard it on NPR before the election, tho I can't remember who was floating it.)

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:04 (twelve years ago)

The only parallel I can think of is the Reagan White House and Paul Volcker deliberately plunging the economy into a recession with a tight money policy to squeeze inflation out of the system. It cost Reagan dearly for two years though.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:05 (twelve years ago)

going over the fiscal cliff would cost obama absolutely nothing except some pundit hand wringing

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:08 (twelve years ago)

it would not plunge the economy into rescission, it would just improve the democrats bargaining position

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:09 (twelve years ago)

'the greatest act of political courage in our lifetimes' i mean srsly

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

Here's today's Yglesias column.

The conceit here is the frankly bizarre idea that since Obama wants to extend the Bush tax cuts for the middle class, he needs to engage in some kind of bargaining process. But this is silly. The Senate already passed a plan to extend the middle-class tax cuts. Now the choice before the House of Representatives is whether they want to vote to pass that plan before the new year or after the new year. Grover Norquist, the conservative Solon on taxes, appears to have made a metaphysical ruling that a vote for partial extension (before the new year) is a vote for higher taxes. That’s silly, but the dictates of holy writ are often a bit arbitrary. All Republicans need to do is wait until the Bush tax cuts have already expired. At that point, a vote for a tax cut that Obama will sign—i.e., the middle-class tax cuts only—would clearly be a vote to cut taxes rather than raise them.

To take the bargaining process seriously at this point you have to believe that come 2013, House Republicans would actually refuse to cut taxes on the grounds that the president’s tax-cut proposal doesn’t cut taxes enough. Then they would blame the economic drag and middle-class pain that their own refusal to cut taxes had caused on the Democrats. But that doesn’t pass the laugh test as a political argument. It ignores the fact that the GOP quite genuinely wants to see rich people pay lower taxes. And since rich people have lots of income that falls below the top bracket cutoff, they actually benefit massively from the middle-class tax cuts Obama favors.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

kicking the can off the fiscal cliff into a sea of tax revenue

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:13 (twelve years ago)

no one is planning on going over the fiscal cliff and then just not climbing back up

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:16 (twelve years ago)

A dumb-ass cable reporter the other day, flummoxed, said we're plunging off the fiscal can.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:18 (twelve years ago)

we're not plunging off the fiscal cliff. we're plunging the fiscal toilet.

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:19 (twelve years ago)

the fiscal gentle down slope

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

time to shit or get off the fiscal toilet

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_l9Pg2dX-9Fc/S93uyMZPQAI/AAAAAAAAApU/sLQgfBZa-V0/s1600/tidy+bowl+man.jpg

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

Oddly enough, was talking with my dad yesterday -- not a 'plugged in' guy when it comes to all the discourse out there, not a net hound or anything -- and also a bit of a deficit hawk, perhaps the most 'conservative' he is these days. And he pretty much thought Obama should take it over the cliff as well without hesitation, for all the various reasons outlined.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:26 (twelve years ago)

A big reason to avoid Papa John's.

Food poisoning was reason enough for me.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Saturday, 10 November 2012 03:50 (twelve years ago)

Meantime, the loneliest website:

http://www.mittromney.com/

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 November 2012 04:02 (twelve years ago)

I mean I honestly love how the only thing going there besides that message and a signup thing is a link to buy MittMerchandise.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 November 2012 04:03 (twelve years ago)

On the "Merchandise" page:

"Free Shipping • Limited Time Only"

I would assume, yeah.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Saturday, 10 November 2012 04:03 (twelve years ago)

Looking forward to this rich job creator creating tons of jobs, which is something the government could never ever do.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 10 November 2012 04:03 (twelve years ago)

Why immigration reform might be really, really good for our economy:

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/the-next-trillion-dollar-stimulus-its-immigration-reform/265018/

Mordy, Saturday, 10 November 2012 06:32 (twelve years ago)

Mentioned in several columns, but even if we go over the "fiscal cliff," they have a year to compromise before a lot of the cuts really kick in. So Obama in theory could have his cake and eat it, too, benefitting from the elapsed Bush cuts and putting pressure on the House, while postponing or otherwise avoiding the new deep cuts in the budget for something less harsh.

From past performances, however, I suspect Obama will either give in or give something major up before we even approach the cliff, as a misbegotten goodwill gesture tossed into the void.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 November 2012 07:40 (twelve years ago)

What can Obama do? According to Grover Norquist, he's already a lame duck president:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/09/phony-fiscal-cliff-congress-cuts-grover-norquist

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 November 2012 07:45 (twelve years ago)

Would like to drown President Grover fucking Norquist in a bathtub of ILX's choosing. He's only one guy, why can't the rest of us find a way of telling him to fuck off that actually results in him fucking off?

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Saturday, 10 November 2012 07:57 (twelve years ago)

So much for Petraeus's political prospects. Slate's reporting the other woman was his biographer, Paula Broadwell.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IElsLkrJyo8/TyH8TZ1_KiI/AAAAAAAACO8/BUoY-KmpyS4/s1600/paula_broadwell.jpg

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Saturday, 10 November 2012 09:01 (twelve years ago)

I'm all in.

crüt, Saturday, 10 November 2012 09:13 (twelve years ago)

Oh, and the now rather awkward Daily Show interview.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Saturday, 10 November 2012 09:16 (twelve years ago)

I'm imagining that Republicans will fight the spectre of massive defense cuts with the spectre of More Benghazi?

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 10 November 2012 09:28 (twelve years ago)

ok so his alleged lover wrote a book about him called All In.

― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 November 2012 22:30 (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

From CIA Director Resigns

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 10 November 2012 09:31 (twelve years ago)

Guess who's hinting at running for reelection...

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 13:04 (twelve years ago)

Would like to drown President Grover fucking Norquist in a bathtub of ILX's choosing.

On CNN last night, he seemed utterly sad and diminished (as opposed to smarmy and smug, when everything's going his way). Unfortunately, you know he'll still continue to exert a lot of influence, at the House level at least.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 13:28 (twelve years ago)

from an article about another low-level gop dude frothing at the mouth:

Hardin County Republican Party Chairman Kent Batman was surprised by the content of Morrison’s Tea Party newsletter.

“Wow,” Batman said. “OK, well — I guess I need to start taking a look at his newsletters.”

da croupier, Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

Batman: All In Against The Tea Party by Grant Morrison

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

kent fuckin batman???

Ryan's taint is definitely unavoidable. (stevie), Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

Kent Batman definitely belongs on the Great Real Names thread.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

"Oh honey, we got a Christmas card from the Batmans!"

da croupier, Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

It's like someone being called Ringo Jagger

Ryan's taint is definitely unavoidable. (stevie), Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

Wow, I was just going to mention MJ's son Prince, but then I read that his birth name is actually Michael Joseph Jackson Jr. Who knew?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 10 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

It's like someone being called Ringo Jagger

Jagger Beatle, really

da croupier, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

Florida is a state with a bunch of Democrats who are knuckledraggers. I think if Crist were to run against Rick Scott, he'd have a really good chance. xps

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

frum brings it, gregory says romneys problem was tone lmao http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/frum-on-morning-joe-remarkable-15.html

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

Romney's problem was content. Or, lack thereof.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

gregory: 'the fiscal cliff hangs over these legislators' everything upsidedown

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/MvvYo.png

hahaha frum listening to mark halprin talk abt leadership

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

hes had enough!

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

Frum was saying the same stuff on CNN opposite Mary Matalin yesterday. It was great--you could tell how agitated she was.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/11/10/ac-matalin-frum-republican-loss.cnn

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3pvhJjTh1qzozwoo1_500.gif

pplains, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

I'm at the library and can't play the CNN clip right now, but I love where Matalin patronizingly/contemptuously calls Frum an "intellectual."

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

DR. KRUGMAN

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

ha omg now scarborough is making some tortured sanctimonious churchill metaphor abt how terrible it is that the conservative media mislead their audience into believing they had a shot in the election, this is what he said a week ago

“Anybody that thinks that this race is anything but a toss-up right now is such an ideologue. They should be kept away from typewriters, computers, laptops, and microphones for the next ten days, because they’re jokes.”

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago)

I liked this quick cutaway to Frum yesterday when Scarborough made his grotesque Churchilll analogy.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

http://www.zazzle.com/president_christie_2017_bumper_sticker-128871514419852534

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 10 November 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago)

Put on your clown suit and go play in the street

a man d'Balmer (some dude), Saturday, 10 November 2012 17:48 (twelve years ago)

I'm at the library and can't play the CNN clip right now, but I love where Matalin patronizingly/contemptuously calls Frum an "intellectual."

he says 'agAInst', how much more intellectual can you get

j., Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

and CANADIAN

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago)

frum brings it, gregory says romneys problem was tone lmao http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/frum-on-morning-joe-remarkable-15.html

― lag∞n, Saturday, November 10, 2012 11:44 AM (1 hour ago)

yeah frum killed that

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:29 (twelve years ago)

what is even frum's deal these days, how is he still a republican

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

well he says he loves romney he was just ruined by the party and that although obama has not raised taxes yet he did run on doing just that 'thats why were republicans'

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

he caught himself and switched from saying 'they' to 'we' when talking about how much the republicans had failed

j., Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

on the couple times i ordered disgusting papa johns during election season i made sure to more then offset the cost with a donation to boldprogressives. made for an expensive pizza.

bnw, Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:40 (twelve years ago)

Frum and Larison are the only conservatives I still read but only because they agree with me.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

on the couple times i ordered disgusting papa johns during election season i made sure to more then offset the cost with a donation to boldprogressives. made for an expensive pizza.

― bnw, Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:40 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

your process and DJP's are going to be streamlined by the 2016 election when Morbius is delivering pizza

a man d'Balmer (some dude), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago)

Frum and Larison are the only conservatives I still read but only because they agree with me.

― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:46 PM (8 minutes ago)

you read the corner every day!

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

Matthew Dowd has been good on This Week as of late. I suspect he's drifting in Frum's direction.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

I "read" The Corner.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

haha i know

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

Dowd, a political consultant/bounty hunter, is good and shrewd but he's drifting towards Gergenlandia.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

Located next to Halperinstan, right?

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

new Soviet bloc iirc

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

so Romney's voteshare at current count is down to...47% (.9...but still)

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 19:28 (twelve years ago)

Another article on the shift in the Cuban-American community.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

sooooo was ordering a couple pizzas from papa johns on election night a little tone-deaf on my part?

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Saturday, 10 November 2012 19:58 (twelve years ago)

also taste-deaf

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 20:08 (twelve years ago)

Papa John's is the worst

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Saturday, 10 November 2012 20:08 (twelve years ago)

so sorry to hear you're deaf and ageusiatic gbx :(

Tome Cruise (Matt P), Saturday, 10 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

i looked up that word on the internet just now

Tome Cruise (Matt P), Saturday, 10 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

What, do none of you have Papa Murphys by you?

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

This trend of businesses firing people cos Obama got elected. Are there 4-year-olds running these companies or something? This is some playground-level "I'm gonna destroy my sand castle cos teacher says we have to share" thinking.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:21 (twelve years ago)

Or, non-thinking. This is literally a public temper tantrum.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:21 (twelve years ago)

dont think theres any evidence of a trend

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago)

prob a repost but if u go to mitt romney's fb page (https://www.facebook.com/mittromney) and keep on refreshing u can watch the # of likes drop

乒乓, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:31 (twelve years ago)

I would not have handled well seeing this facial expression every day until 2017.

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/c223.0.403.403/p403x403/396576_10151158799556121_1554362058_n.jpg

pplains, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:44 (twelve years ago)

Mitt Romney

2 hours ago.

From the bottom of our hearts, Ann and I thank you for your support, prayers, efforts, and vote. We are forever grateful to every one of you.

Darlene McGonigle After all the things that were said about you from people that had a lot to gain by scaring people about you. I am so glad to have seen you in the campaign. I am glad I checked further and then we saw you really out there and I have to say, I am so impressed with who you are. You are a hard worker. You are a smart man and you know how to make money. I applaud you that you can take a failing business and bring it up and sell it. I do think some just can't keep the ball rolling with a business as you can. I love the fact you are a Christian man. I am glad you stand up for your principles. At first I really wanted you to fight meaner to assault the attacks that Obama and his people were making on you. Now, I am glad you did not stoop and lower yourself to play the dirty game that Obama and his workers did. Had you lessened yourself, then that is another good man shot down in a sinners eyes, and we need all the good men we have. Thanks for running and sharing who you are with us.

scott seward, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:56 (twelve years ago)

Marie Jenkins Ya when they show the map he should have won most of it was red.they cheated

scott seward, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:58 (twelve years ago)

Denise Gallaway To all of you that think this country owes you GET this through your thick heads we owe you nothing I happen to be one of the hard working people of this nation and what are you nuts going to do when we get tired of supporting you and you have mo skills so you cant work for yourselves grow up you wanted obama now you live with a lieing cheeting underhanded cheet hope this country is still here in four years oh common cents tells you cant spend your way out of dept just a dumb idea . A Gallaway

scott seward, Saturday, 10 November 2012 21:59 (twelve years ago)

sorry. i'll stop. choice quotes from mitt's facebook could be a good thread though. oh so much richness to choose from.

scott seward, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:00 (twelve years ago)

She was working so hard she never learned how to punctuate or spell. POBRECITO.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:08 (twelve years ago)

Marie Jenkins Ya when they show the map he should have won most of it was red.they cheated

This. I still hear this.

pplains, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:10 (twelve years ago)

prob a repost but if u go to mitt romney's fb page (https://www.facebook.com/mittromney) and keep on refreshing u can watch the # of likes drop

I just spent a minute going back and forth between his and Obama's, during which Romney dropped by about 75 and Obama added 100.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

prob a repost but if u go to mitt romney's fb page (https://www.facebook.com/mittromney) and keep on refreshing u can watch the # of likes drop

this is really the best best thing

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:23 (twelve years ago)

Haha

Every time I think the number has stabilized it drops AGAIN

Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:43 (twelve years ago)

sorry. i'll stop. choice quotes from mitt's facebook could be a good thread though. oh so much richness to choose from.

― scott seward, Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:00 PM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lotsa talk about firing workers who like obama on facebook

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

I quoted 乒乓's post about Facebook on Facebook, and I've already gotten one like. I feel just like Jon Lovitz in The Wedding Singer--Mitt's life is falling apart, and I'm reaping all the benefits.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:47 (twelve years ago)

The joke is that I can hear Mitt doing Lovitz's lines in my head, it's a perfect fit.

Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago)

Thankfully I've been saved from myself. Someone named Alene Skousen Bowler posted the following on Mitt's page: "Have you noticed if you ever post anything against Obama it won't print it. I have several times." I couldn't resist replying: "It's part of the giant conspiracy--try to carry on with your life." Big surprise--my comment won't print.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago)

to me it seems like, idk, the death star exploding over endor and then being on endor watching all of the tiny bits and pieces of it burn up during reentry

乒乓, Saturday, 10 November 2012 22:55 (twelve years ago)

Larry Boyd I am grateful to you both, Governor. It was so refreshing to see some competence and class in action. So sad that so many are blind to truth. I feel that the dems played upon fears to women that contraception would be a thing of the past, even though your record as Gov. in Mass. proved otherwise. And I respect you and agree with you that abortion is so hurtful. Don't we all deserve the chance to at least draw breath? And in cases of rape, the RU486 pill could be used instead of waiting to stop life. Thank you for running a race that must be punishing in its pace. You could surely have sat back on your wealth and not tried to make a difference, but you gave so much of yourself - Ann, too. I think America missed a great opportunity. As I read my Bible each morning, it seems that we are repeating mistakes of the past which will have heavy consequences. People have been deceived. I am a degreed professional with my own business that is just about to bust. It is a burden to think that the families of the ladies that work for me depend on my business, and nobody has gotten a raise in 5 years. May divine providence continue in my little world. And may God continue to bless you and yours. Btw - I still find myself humming "I want Romney" to the tune of "I want candy"! It puts a smile on my face in these truly scary times. Your strength and grace are a beautiful thing- keep on! Tiffany Boyd, DMD

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago)

I am a degreed professional with my own business that is just about to bust.

It is a burden to think that the families of the ladies that work for me depend on my business, and nobody has gotten a raise in 5 years.

May divine providence continue in my little world.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

Btw - I still find myself humming "I want Romney" to the tune of "I want candy"! It puts a smile on my face in these truly scary times.

Feeling this.

Tim F, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

I'm more prone to "Da Do Rom Romney."

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:05 (twelve years ago)

imagine if your boss kept singing 'I want romney' all day at work

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:05 (twelve years ago)

http://www.tubecityonline.com/almanac/images/11071984bloomcounty.jpg

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:05 (twelve years ago)

romney on the beach there's nothing better
http://i2.crtcdn1.net/images/ed/2012/05/25/921799.jpg
but i like romney when it's wrapped in a sweater
http://i2.crtcdn1.net/images/ed/2012/05/25/921799.jpg

balls, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:07 (twelve years ago)

hurley more like *hurls*

Tome Cruise (Matt P), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:09 (twelve years ago)

Michael Graham I am so bummed, I was excited about you, as a small manufacturer I was ready to buy a new machine on wednesday, I could have created a new job. now I'm thinking a used one so I dont have to hire anybody.you have my vote always!
about a minute ago · Like

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:13 (twelve years ago)

this is kinda just a fantastic way for a lot of people to do what they were gonna do anyway, it's true w/ the bosses firing people, but I bet there are lots of parents who are like 'sorry kids you can't get ice cream tonight, obama won'

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:15 (twelve years ago)

I was probably gonna create a new job at mcdonalds but instead you guys have to eat sugar packets for dessert

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:15 (twelve years ago)

'sorry sam...I just don't think we can be together any longer...it's not you...or me...it's obama'

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:16 (twelve years ago)

'and its a shame because if we stayed together our relationship would be creating new jobs'

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:17 (twelve years ago)

if these businesses aren't successful enough to handle providing their employees with healthcare isn't that just the free market thinning the herd?

a man d'Balmer (some dude), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:25 (twelve years ago)

ive read like twenty articles that same the same thing but i still cant quite comprehend romney holding the same theory as the unskewed poll guy who everyone had been mocking for a month http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/why_romney_was_surprised_to_lose_his_campaign_had_the_wrong_numbers_bad.html

lag∞n, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

feel like his presidency would look a lot like the campaign in that regard

iatee, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:33 (twelve years ago)

It's basically like they just looked at the economic numbers and said, "This guy can't win, the unemployment rate will kill him, all we have to do is show up." I think they really believed that, they kept talking about how "fundamentals" were going to decide the race. Almost like it was an abstract thing that didn't require any real human action.

Also, can't possibly roll my eyes hard enough at this: Romney advisers say it was impossible to compete against Obama’s huge war chest.

Richie Romney and his SuperPACs whining about a war chest is just ...

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

"Abortion is so hurtful"

Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:46 (twelve years ago)

Missed this--one of the more entertaining hissy fits I've seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UNO5_I3YDc

"Derision, division, destruction, distraction"--she sounds like Jackie Chiles.

clemenza, Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:47 (twelve years ago)

she's drunk, right?

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 10 November 2012 23:52 (twelve years ago)

She's a shotglass of Butterschapps away from going full Dankert.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:01 (twelve years ago)

what a fuckin ghoul

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:03 (twelve years ago)

"I don't care what you think, Van..."

Love when they call the election a squeaker. Romney wins 332-206, 51-48%, you can just hear Matalin and Rove and the rest saying, "Close call--we better tread lightly."

clemenza, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:10 (twelve years ago)

http://roadsandkingdoms.com/2012/election/

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:18 (twelve years ago)

this is kinda just a fantastic way for a lot of people to do what they were gonna do anyway, it's true w/ the bosses firing people, but I bet there are lots of parents who are like 'sorry kids you can't get ice cream tonight, obama won'

the thing is most of the people you see saying "I'M A SMALL BUSINESS AND I'M NOT HIRING ANYBODY" are like internet marines, they're not actually business owners at all - they're people who fantasize about being able to punish the president for winning by fucking up the business they don't actually own. lotta pathology out there imo

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:32 (twelve years ago)

internet marines?

scott seward, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:36 (twelve years ago)

you mean people who say they are marines on the internet?

scott seward, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:36 (twelve years ago)

The Secret Marines

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:47 (twelve years ago)

Love when they call the election a squeaker. Romney wins 332-206, 51-48%, you can just hear Matalin and Rove and the rest saying, "Close call--we better tread lightly."

Dem gains in both house and senate, too. Not enough to take a majority or supermajority in them, respectively, but still the GOP lost ground in all phases.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago)

lollllllllll from that slate article

“It just defied logic,” said a top aide of the idea that Obama could match, let alone exceed, his performance with minorities from the last election.

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 11 November 2012 00:59 (twelve years ago)

it shouldn't, but it amazes me how openly disappointed and rueful these guys are that minorities voted

a man d'Balmer (some dude), Sunday, 11 November 2012 01:02 (twelve years ago)

Wtf I remember matalin being annoying but not pyscho...her &carville still aren't married are they?

captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 11 November 2012 02:56 (twelve years ago)

this is kinda just a fantastic way for a lot of people to do what they were gonna do anyway, it's true w/ the bosses firing people, but I bet there are lots of parents who are like 'sorry kids you can't get ice cream tonight, obama won'

the thing is most of the people you see saying "I'M A SMALL BUSINESS AND I'M NOT HIRING ANYBODY" are like internet marines, they're not actually business owners at all - they're people who fantasize about being able to punish the president for winning by fucking up the business they don't actually own. lotta pathology out there imo

―Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned),Saturday, November 10, 2012 6:32 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Joe the Plumber didn't actually own a plumbing business right?

captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Sunday, 11 November 2012 02:58 (twelve years ago)

woah matalin looks like she hasn't slept since the election in that vid, screencap looks like a goddamn mug shot

da croupier, Sunday, 11 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

you mean people who say they are marines on the internet?

yah - feel like there's tons of specifically marines-based personae online, I thought I saw like a 60 minutes about False Marine Syndrome but I'm not getting a hit on that? but yeah, people in comments threads who Own A Business And I'm Firing Everybody!! ...no you're not, you work at Long John Silver's man, be honest, it's cool

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 11 November 2012 03:22 (twelve years ago)

Really enjoyed this piece I just noticed -- it's a dude's status update from two days ago, but damn:

https://www.facebook.com/rob.ellsworth.10/posts/10100232574271105

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 11 November 2012 03:24 (twelve years ago)

Reminds me of the Firesign Theatre line -- "Mister Armchair Quarterback, Mister Wheelchair General"

xp

WilliamC, Sunday, 11 November 2012 03:25 (twelve years ago)

Good find, Ned.

Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 11 November 2012 03:42 (twelve years ago)

this election was particularly good for schadenfreude, all those billions of repub dollars wasted, romney somehow actually thinking he was going to win, racist twitter posts, i've been soaking it all up

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago)

after an election losers should be forced to hit the talk show circuit and be good sports while the hosts make fun of them and play videos of all their gaffes

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:20 (twelve years ago)

I think that's basically exactly what Nixon and Dole did after losing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-ihI5_Vg6A

clemenza, Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/oJMP5.jpg

hoho yep dave i did really think i was gonna win *forced smile, shrug*

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

all those billions of repub dollars wasted

I think part of Rove's reaction to Ohio being called was genuine and utter bafflement that he spent $300 million for absolutely nothing. I expected him to say, "But I've got the receipt right here!"

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

receipt = Megyn Kelly

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago)

reference to pat secretly rolling a tape recorder to capture nixon at the piano seems ironic now

Ryan's taint is definitely unavoidable. (stevie), Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

obv smugness can grate, but i can't really be bothered to empathize with republicans, seems pretty clear that most people in america will benefit from the obama win so gloating at their current suffering is also a form of celebrating their long-term good fortune, they just don't know it yet. also the most vocals ones among them say pretty nasty things all the time, including post-election, harder to take the counterfactual high road when they are currently saying tonnes of horrendous shit about dem constituents

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

can Lindsey Graham even speak English?

"It's one thing to shoot yourself in the foot, just don't reload the gun," Graham said. "So I intend not to reload this gun when it comes to Hispanics."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)

i know we stopped talking about this a few days ago, but re:

And then, on January 1, 2013, we will all awake to a different, substantially more liberal country. The Bush tax cuts will have disappeared, restoring Clinton-era tax rates and flooding government coffers with revenue to fund its current operations for years to come. The military will be facing dire budget cuts that shake the military-industrial complex to its core. It will be a real-world approximation of the old liberal bumper-sticker fantasy in which schools have all the money they require and the Pentagon needs to hold a bake sale.

what's hilarious about this to me is that if wingnuts were even slightly paying attention, they would realize that obama's inevitable compromise to avoid the nightmare of existing in a substantially more liberal country is proof that, uh, he's not substantially liberal. and it's also funny to think about what would happen if republicans were in power with the inverse situation - all they have to do is sit tight until January 1, and somehow a bunch of tax cuts for the wealthy go into effect and the military gets a huge boost to their budget? Can you imagine Reagan or W compromising rather than just letting it happen?

Z S, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

GOP '13: "We will not shoot Hispanics."

pplains, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

I read the Yglesias piece in Slate, and the logic seems flawless: don't do anything, take a short-term political and economic hit, expired Bush tax cuts + military cuts hugely cut into the deficit, then pass a middle-class tax cut to restart the economy. The only thing is, you're still dealing with Republicans on the latter. Even though not to pass such a cut would hurt the economy and hurt themselves politically--there's no way they could rationalize not passing it--do they care anymore? Wouldn't they be happy to take a ruined economy for another chance at a failed Obama presidency? Serious question--or am I missing something?

clemenza, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

we support a self-shooting policy

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

Military cuts might be the biggest problem. I can see the Republicans spinning it as Benghazi Two: Open Season America.

Theodora Celery, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

I get weak in the knees thinking about how pissed the Republicans are if the do-nothing-and-let-the-tax-cuts-expire approach gets used, ""'"//[[[//////////\].\]'
\
][
{+{/{//”/[/[/[[//{/=[[/[/[/[?[=÷[=/[/≥
lk

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago)

half of that post was written by a 14-month-old baby can you guess which half

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

what's hilarious about this to me is that if wingnuts were even slightly paying attention, they would realize that obama's inevitable compromise to avoid the nightmare of existing in a substantially more liberal country is proof that, uh, he's not substantially liberal.

― Z S, Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:35 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lotta blogger dudes are talking like its a given that obamas gonna take the plunge but im not sure where this is coming from, im p afraid hell do some fake ass grand bargain, tho the gop has said no higher taxes for the rich which should be a non starter, which brings me to something i wondered abt the previous grand bargin proposals how much of it was just political positioning, he mustve known the gop would pass on any tax increases at all, also how much did liberal dems hold their fire on ss cuts knowing that the gop wasnt gonna bite

anyway i dont trust obama to play it tuff on this one but am open to the possibility of being pleasantly surprised

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

expired Bush tax cuts + military cuts hugely cut into the deficit

they won't hugely cut into the debt considering they're both certain to be bargained down

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

I get weak in the knees thinking about how pissed the Republicans are if the do-nothing-and-let-the-tax-cuts-expire approach gets used, ""'"//[[[//////////\].\]'
\
][
{+{/{//”/[/[/[[//{/=[[/[/[/[?[=÷[=/[/≥
lk

― Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:53 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

half of that post was written by a 14-month-old baby can you guess which half

― Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:54 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Throw in some $ and you have the beginnings of a perl coder

Infamous dickbiscuits (silby), Sunday, 11 November 2012 19:57 (twelve years ago)

personally i find it a bit reverse ageist to be assuming 14-month olds are not capable of coherently posting to ilx

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:00 (twelve years ago)

i think his approval rating could take a major hit if he takes the nestea plunge, i guess it depends how well dems explain it to americans before it happens, but i think rn just about everyone would freak the fuck out and blame him

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:01 (twelve years ago)

that's partly what I was addressing on Friday: he'd have to absorb possible drop in public opinion, Wall Street anxiety, and the ire of Very Serious pundits, plus his own inclination to be a guy who makes deals with enemies.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

I think Obama could come through this okay if congress Dems can corner their GOP colleagues and get what they want. If not, congress's approval number are already garbage anyway.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

yeah but if there's ever been a time he can be flexible w/ his approval rating it's right now xp

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

true, and hes got 4 years to make it up again

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

still a ballsy move though

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

prob the way to do it is to start by offering up a bill thatll restore everything except the high end tax cuts, then you make a big show of attempting to negotiate w/the republicans, then on the first day of the fiscal cliff you offer up the same bill again, itll be v hard for republicans not to vote for it as at that point its a middle class tax cut / increase in military spending bill w/no tax increases cause theyve already kicked in

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

for sure, and even more of a ballsy move for anyone running for a seat in 2 years. but the timing is good for a ballsy move, and it rarely is. so it might actually happen. xp

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:07 (twelve years ago)

republicans have a huge incentive to make a compromise and we may yet see one if they are a rational body at all. right now they have let's say 5% leverage and obama has 95% leverage. their 5% is the temporary bad press of dysfunctional government brushing off on obama and maybe market dipping. but after we go off the cliff they'll have 0% leverage. it's in their interest to get at least 5% concessions to avert the fiscal cliff. i guess this will be an indication of whether congress has any functionality at all left.

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

idk if theyre ready, its all so sudden

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

prob the way to do it is to start by offering up a bill thatll restore everything except the high end tax cuts, then you make a big show of attempting to negotiate w/the republicans, then on the first day of the fiscal cliff you offer up the same bill again, itll be v hard for republicans not to vote for it as at that point its a middle class tax cut / increase in military spending bill w/no tax increases cause theyve already kicked in

― lag∞n, Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:06 PM (3 minutes ago)

maybe we don't have to restore alla the defense spending tho

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

one man is not a very good sample set but bill kristol's early surrender on this is a v good sign. the gop is still gonna be in freak out mode for a while. maybe we need to convince them that hispanics really, really love raising taxes on millionaires, like it is their favorite thing in the world.

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

otm xp

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

asking them to raise taxes especially, going against their core belief

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

the ~real~ core belief for all politicians is getting reelected

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

and that can only happen w/ the latino vote, and latinos love this more than they love tacos

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

maybe we don't have to restore alla the defense spending tho

― all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, November 11, 2012 3:10 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i would certainly like to see none of the defense spending restored but i kinda doubt theres any will to do so atm

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

tbf raising taxes on the rich is p much everyones favorite thing

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

basically the gop is in rebuilding mode and it won't be a year from now.

and taxing rich people still popular. always popular.

xp yep

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

what woould we put the odds at of having the top rates extended? is it more than a 25% chance?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

at least 50-50 I think

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

yeah that's what i figured/feared

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

oh wait I misread that, no I think there is at least a 50% chance they're raised

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

yeah that was poorly worded tbf

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

100% chance top rates are raised imo. Not necessarily by full amount, but Obama can't not raise them at this point.

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

how significant a source of revenue would a likely tax on the rich be?

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:21 (twelve years ago)

feel like the rich are gonna have to eat a slight tax increase even if its not all the way back to clinton rates, nightmare scenario is obvs dems settling for loop hole closures etc for the revenue end

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:21 (twelve years ago)

something like $700B over 10 years iirc. it's a good start

xp

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago)

On the Democratic side of the equation, Washington Sen. Patty Murray took a hard line on fiscal cliff negotiations and suggested that Democrats should be willing to go over the cliff if need be, a welcome sign for progressives who are worried that President Obama will cave too easily. “We can’t accept an unfair deal that piles on the middle class and tell them they have to support it,” she said on “This Week” on ABC. “So if the Republicans will not agree with [revenue increases], we will reach a point at the end of this year where all the tax cuts expire and we’ll start over next year. And whatever we do will be a tax cut for whatever package we put together. That may be the way to get past this.”

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:23 (twelve years ago)

1 down

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:24 (twelve years ago)

thing im really curious abt is if the senate will do anything w/filibuster reform, theres no way theyll get rid of it outright this year but theres a chance they could modify it, harry reid once a staunch traditionist on the matter has been talkin tuff

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:25 (twelve years ago)

yes i was gonna ask about that, what are the prospects for that?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

lotsa people have...hopefully the modifications are more than just symbolic tho

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

best would be if they made it so 41 senators needed to be in the chamber to filibuster

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

very good prospects for something to change - like I'd put it at +75%, very ? when it comes to what that change is

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:27 (twelve years ago)

man nate silver has turned us all into deathdrone

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:29 (twelve years ago)

haha

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:29 (twelve years ago)

we need to start betting imho

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:29 (twelve years ago)

mods could you code that in, should only take 5 mins thx

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

when do we get mod reform

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

mod reform has very low chances of happening, like 20-30%

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

Chuck Schumer apparently working on immigration bill w/ Lindsey Graham

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

i think they should change the name of the filibuster, preferably to something without "buster" in it

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

filikeaton

Mordy, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

imo people should not be ____-busting things, period

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago)

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/liberal_schadenfreude_obama_s_win_brings_out_too_mean_gloating_on_social.html

Seems like the writer is saying that Republicans were not gloating in 2004? I seem to remember this:

http://static.musictoday.com/store/bands/2497/product_medium/BXCD020.JPG

Binders Full of Mittens (President Keyes), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago)

whenever anything happens somebody gloats

there are like 60m people who voted for obama, of course like 100,000 people will be obnoxious gloaters

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

social media has made it more public and makes it easier to highlight the gloatiest of the gloats

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:36 (twelve years ago)

my old congressman maurice hinchey, who was pretty great and way more liberal than our district, is retiring after this congress. his old district got changed and the dem who tried to succeed him got creamed by an incumbent republican :(

all mods con (k3vin k.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

x-post I guess since I was reading political blogs back in '04 I saw more than my share of Conservagloating

Binders Full of Mittens (President Keyes), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

i privately gloated and engaged in extensive schadenfreude

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

haha 'the gloating was done among family and friends in a small ceremony'

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago)

it was a traditional all american gloat

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

lol

flopson, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

Checking up on Glenn, and it appears that one man's gloat is another man's business opportunity
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/11/07/glenn-we-are-going-to-double-down/

Theodora Celery, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

good idea

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:47 (twelve years ago)

Learned something today:

filibuster (n.)
1580s, flibutor "pirate," probably ultimately from Du. vrijbuiter "freebooter," used of pirates in the West Indies as Sp. filibustero. Used 1850s and '60s to describe lawless adventurers from the U.S. who tried to overthrow Central American countries. The legislative sense is first recorded c.1851, probably because obstructionist legislators "pirated" debate.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago)

I miss that dudes creepy apocalyptic ramblings being televised nationally every day. Xpost

Gukbe, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

And when I woke up at 3:00 in the morning, I realized, boy ... we haven’t fixed it for that cliff, if you invert that fiscal cliff or the cliff that we have made for ourself on almost every front, the educational cliff, the societal cliff, not just the fiscal cliff. If you invert that, it’s a mountain. And we hadn’t even begun to climb the mountain yet. How could we possibly take the steam out of our shovel? We can’t.

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:53 (twelve years ago)

donating money to theblaze might be one of the best ways someone on the left can spend their money on politics atm

iatee, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:55 (twelve years ago)

How could we possibly take the steam out of our shovel? We can’t. Makes you think.

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 20:57 (twelve years ago)

How could we let our lettuce wilt? How could we let our balloon-poodle deflate? How could we let our triceps sag?

Aimless, Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:03 (twelve years ago)

glenn beck passing the plate is such a true american vision

May God richly bless your sacrifice, as you give us the strength and the power to deliver value for your investment.

difficult listening hour, Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

because, as the Bible tells us, nothing is more important to God than money.

Aimless, Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

Connect that Perlstien article about the GOP con-men up with the Glenn Beck panhandling. Seems like a great illustration of your standard authoritarian social-dominator dynamic, where you get a vast swath of people raised to be unquestioning credulous obedient followers set upon by the sociopathic.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

Appearing Sunday on ABC's "This Week" Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), a member of the Democratic leadership, telegraphed her party's intentions if Republicans refuse to accept a tax increase on the wealthy.

"To solve this problem, the wealthiest Americans have to pay their fair share too," she said. "If the Republicans will not agree with that, we will reach a point at the end of this year where all the tax cuts expire and we'll start over next year, and whatever we do will be a tax cut for whatever package we put together. That may be the way to get past this."

lag∞n, Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

Didn't Norquist signal that a pre-Jan. 1 tax deal would be counted as a violation of the sacred pledge, but a tax increase on the wealthy in 2013 would be just "What could we do?"

Binders Full of Mittens (President Keyes), Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:39 (twelve years ago)

Just put all House republicans on this bus. Heck, I'll even throw in a Blaze subscription to tide them over on their wild rant filled joy-ride with Norquist at the wheel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozjN_bmfI5c

Theodora Celery, Sunday, 11 November 2012 21:41 (twelve years ago)

Checking up on Glenn, and it appears that one man's gloat is another man's business opportunity
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/11/07/glenn-we-are-going-to-double-down/

Glenn advised listeners to "buy farmland" in the event of an Obama victory

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:02 (twelve years ago)

Isn't it the land that gets seized first during a socialist revolution?

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago)

personally i find it a bit reverse ageist to be assuming 14-month olds are not capable of coherently posting to ilx.

― all mods con (k3vin k.)

personally I find it pretty humorous that k3v is unaware that the term ageism refers to both prejudice against youth AND the elderly. I'm just gonna assume he's too young to know better... ;)

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:34 (twelve years ago)

Most people wouldn't know what to do with farmland anyway. Farming is a knowlege intensive pursuit and ignorant people don't do well with it for the first x years until they learn wtf they are doing.

Aimless, Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

farm=more places to dig holes to hide your gold

Binders Full of Mittens (President Keyes), Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:18 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lRN9_zw-Jw

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:19 (twelve years ago)

honestly very impressed with the production values of the show

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:21 (twelve years ago)

lol he has the oval office mocked up behind him?

zvookster, Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:23 (twelve years ago)

XP Re: Perlstien GOP con-men / Glenn Beck panhandling, here's David Frum doing a postmortem on Scarborough:

The real locus of the problem is the Republican activist base and the Republican donor base. They went apocalyptic over the past four years. And that was exploited by a lot of people in the conservative world. I won't soon forget the lupine smile that played over the head of a major conservative institution when he told me that our donors think the apocalypse has arrived. Republicans have been fleeced and exploited and lied to by a conservative entertainment complex.

The whole 15 minute discussion for the schadenfreude addicts and masochists.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago)

hell I was hard just hearing anybody saying "lupine" on cable television

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago)

xp: you don't have to farm to profit from farmland. Plenty of farmers lease farmland, and there are companies that much like rental management companies which will post your property listing(s) and manage the payments. The problem with farmland as an investment is its already experienced a big boom, a lot from Wall St. money flooding in, so there's a very good chance a current entry would be buying at the top.

https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/images/c2-70fig1.gif

Rental rates haven't risen nearly as fast, so it makes a lot of sense for farmers to rent and skim value from naive Wall Streeters, rather than pay the carrying costs on the land themselves.

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/images/c2-20tbl1.gif

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Sunday, 11 November 2012 23:56 (twelve years ago)

has anyone read the frum kindle single on why romney lost yet?

balls, Monday, 12 November 2012 00:51 (twelve years ago)

http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/11/09/how-much-did-money-matter/

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 00:59 (twelve years ago)

i love that you have to LEAVE THE EAST to buy farmland??? its a shame that there are no farms in the east. the barren wastelands that are new york and new jersey and new england. don't get me wrong, i'm all for beck's fans moving to the mid-west. i will help them pack.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 01:25 (twelve years ago)

its p hilarious beck doling out this advice from manhattan

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 01:26 (twelve years ago)

I thought he built his studio complex in texas

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago)

hey he moved to texas i stand corrected

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 01:30 (twelve years ago)

Beck's show is broadcast from a blimp slowly circling the globe, 24-7, out of the reach of radio jammers and government tax agencies. Once a week or so it releases the contents of its toilets as ballast. If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time, he will rain his poo on you.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 02:17 (twelve years ago)

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQK0P-U0qbsqfSVafnBIGJa4uRd6qSIi9jjBH5ViZtzCtqxfT067g

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 November 2012 02:17 (twelve years ago)

glen beck why is he so bad and hated

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 02:18 (twelve years ago)

has anyone read the frum kindle single on why romney lost yet?

― balls, Sunday, November 11, 2012 6:51 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ha, or his novel?

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 02:19 (twelve years ago)

http://disappearingromney.com/

Now you don't have to bother refreshing Mitt's fb page. You can just watch a plummeting chart in realtime.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:03 (twelve years ago)

that is beautiful

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:07 (twelve years ago)

brilliant

Doctor Casino, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:29 (twelve years ago)

Watch it inspire a counter-campaign though (which will still end up being a drop in the bucket). Reminds me of when our 8th grade social studies teacher wanted us to organize a response action to the Russian plot (scooped in the Weekly World News) to have their entire population jump at the same time, knocking the Earth out of its orbit.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:30 (twelve years ago)

Ha I was just thinking that

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:36 (twelve years ago)

some one needs to forward that to the mittster

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:36 (twelve years ago)

But, I mean, who seriously unlikes an entity?

If O had lost this election it never would've occurred to me to unlike any of the O related pages I'm attached to now. Are most people that hardcore about curating their FB pages?

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:37 (twelve years ago)

prob as people see romney posts in their feed theyre goin oh no and deleting that shit

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:39 (twelve years ago)

Has that entity been posting stuff? It might turn into a page hawking a Romney book or just have paid republican material pretty soon.

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 03:40 (twelve years ago)

couple thank you posts since the election

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:42 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/e8lQr.png

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:43 (twelve years ago)

have no idea why people would be sick of seeing that famously warm open smile

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:44 (twelve years ago)

i like how pleased with himself jamie d. henry looks.

estela, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:46 (twelve years ago)

I refreshed Nate Silver's FB page three times, but his likes were static. No mass migration going on.

clemenza, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:46 (twelve years ago)

So you're calling me "Ghetto" Allison?,,,

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Monday, 12 November 2012 03:47 (twelve years ago)

God I never wanna see Mitt's face ever, ever again

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:47 (twelve years ago)

^ can a mod rename this thread xp

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 03:47 (twelve years ago)

But, I mean, who seriously unlikes an entity?

If O had lost this election it never would've occurred to me to unlike any of the O related pages I'm attached to now. Are most people that hardcore about curating their FB pages?

― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, November 11, 2012 10:37 PM (50 minutes ago)

thing is you really liked obama

all mods con (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 November 2012 04:29 (twelve years ago)

Ah

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 12 November 2012 04:56 (twelve years ago)

Blackboard message on "The Simpsons" tonight: "I will not concede the election until Karl Rove gives me permission"

Faster than food (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 12 November 2012 04:59 (twelve years ago)

i see a lot of people like brands these days (or at least facebook wants me to know people are liking them), and i assume they expect to get some free shit. And the chances of Mitt Romney giving people a victory coupon have definitely diminished.

da croupier, Monday, 12 November 2012 04:59 (twelve years ago)

'if you want free stuff vote for the other guy' --mitt romney

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 05:01 (twelve years ago)

Mitt is over, plz move on and march against Obama thx

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 05:02 (twelve years ago)

np marching now

da croupier, Monday, 12 November 2012 05:10 (twelve years ago)

I'd rather march for some specific policy change than against some individual. Makes more sense.

Aimless, Monday, 12 November 2012 05:17 (twelve years ago)

march for marching against obama

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 06:02 (twelve years ago)

howbout an individual who embodies zero policy change?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 11:54 (twelve years ago)

Morbs' Views: Fair and Balanced

Come Into My Layer (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 November 2012 12:13 (twelve years ago)

that would be you. and i refuse to march against the morbz.

x-post

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 12:14 (twelve years ago)

no dude, under my policies all the 'stuff' comes to me

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 12:29 (twelve years ago)

countdown until Scalia rage-induced heart attack

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:17 (twelve years ago)

and when he falls he falls on top of Alito and Slobbo.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

http://whnt.com/2012/11/12/alabama-among-states-petitioning-the-u-s-government-to-secede-from-the-country/

It’s a movement by the residents of at least 15 states, including Alabama, where people have petitioned the government to secede from the United State of America.

It’s something the president would have to sign off on, so it seems to be an unlikely scenario.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

I see.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

plz plz plz

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

I would not want to be a pet dog or a living room wall in Alabama after this past week.

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

we should let one state do this just to show the rest of them why it's actually not in their best interests and that one state should be alabama

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

Other states where residents are asking to be allowed to secede include Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Kentucky, North Carolina, North Dakota, Indiana, New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Montana, and Oregon.

the mason-dickhead line

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

i'm guessing that if alabama had to live without federal money it would change its name to Casinostan.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

new york seceding from new york is more important than new york seceding from america, but both could also work

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

come on you cant let alabama go w/o mississippi, it would be lonely, they can to a trinidad and tobago type thing and call their country alabama and mississippi

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

if they could find a way to grow a cash crop with low labor costs, idk, they could make it work

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

Indiana couldn't even stand being the only state in the region not observing Daylight Saving Time, how the hell is it going to cope with being its own separate entity?

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitions

Almost every petition on the front page is for a state requesting to secede.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

Raise employment in surrounding states with newly-trained border guards, a big wall around the state.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

Ashley Bodel 3 hours ago

Vanessa, I do not care if the man is Black, or if he was purple with polka dots, no one I know is upset about the fact that he is black, as a matter of fact VEEERRRY few people in this country really cares about that fact. Ma'dam please stop being so racist to assume that all white people are against black people. That is water under the bridge and that fact is most white people are not racist at all, but because of black people paranoia like yours your own people have become racist. Please have a think about how you word things again.
Why I actually dislike the man, is because he has lied, cheated, manipulated and pretty much done everything he could to damage this country. Sure Obamacare might have been a good thing, if EVERYBODY got it, but now thanks to him there is a gap, people who do not work and sit on welfare are pretty much all taken care of, people who are rich do not have to worry about it, but your average working american, (who can be Black, Hispanic, Asian and whatever. ) can pretty much no longer have health care. It has now officially become cheaper for companies to pay the fines then to pay for people healthcare and that is what they are doing. Yet these people are working, and thus can not get Obamacare at the moment. What about those people hm? What about the countles vets I see on the street of ALL colors because of yes Obama?
And as for god, he left this country a looong time ago.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20121112_In_59_Philadelphia_voting_wards__Mitt_Romney_got_zero_votes.html

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

Georgia not even capitalising it's name on the petition, have some price, Georgia, hold your head up.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

No, wait, stop.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

*pride.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

Harris, in an interview, said he works for the GOP mostly because he believes city neighborhoods need attention from both parties.

"I open the door to the community and let them be exposed to diversity in the political party," Harris said. "I want political community-based leverage."

Harris cast his vote for Romney, but he's also an Obama fan.

"I love both of those people," he said.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:47 (twelve years ago)

I don't think I have ever in my life seen someone say "I love both presidential candidates!"

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:47 (twelve years ago)

"Yankees, Red Sox, I wish both teams could win!"

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

man, not even a single person accidentally voting for Romney, that is crazy

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

there are like 60m people who voted for obama, of course like 100,000 people will be obnoxious gloaters

I had no idea the board had that many registrants

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

lurkers, silently gloating

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

the mason-dickhead line

Deserves to be noted.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Monday, 12 November 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

Although voter registration lists, which often contain outdated information, show 12 Republicans live in the ward's third division, The Inquirer was unable to find any of them by calling or visiting their homes. [...] A few blocks away, Eric Sapp, a 42-year-old chef, looked skeptical when told that city data had him listed as a registered Republican. "I got to check on that," said Sapp, who voted for Obama.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

got to check on that he said looking nervously around as his neighbors sharpened knives and slowly hit baseball bats into their hands

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

So on those petitions, the administration is supposed to provide some response to anything with more than 25,000 signatures.

"Thank you ALABAMA for expressing your interest in/concern about SECEDING. The issue of STATES WITHDRAWING FROM THE UNION is one of great interest and concern to this administration. Please rest assured we will give diligent consideration to your request for THE PERMISSION TO FORM YOUR OWN THIRD-WORLD COUNTRY. God bless America."

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

I had no idea the board had that many registrants

They'd probably be more visible presences here if strawmen didn't have such a hard time typing.

Come Into My Layer (Old Lunch), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/man-with-romney-tattoo-on-face-is-disappointed.html

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

tipsy, I'm stealing that and posting it in the comments.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

“I’m a tattoo guy, and it was something fun,” he said. “I was trying to make politics fun. I didn’t change no lives; I’m no hero. But I shed blood for this campaign, and I’m glad to know that I did all that I could.”

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

“I’m the guy who has egg all over his face, but instead of egg, it’s a big Romney/Ryan tattoo. It’s there for life.”

this dude is hilarious

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

if they could find a way to grow a cash crop with low labor costs, idk, they could make it work

if alabama seceded how quickly would they reinstate slavery?

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

immediately but its the year 2012 and even alabama is a more progressive place - they would allow white people to be enslaved too

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago)

also you can now earn your way out of slavery by being on a team that wins a bcs game

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:16 (twelve years ago)

debt slavery has a long illustrious past and i'm sure there are tons of suitable candidates in alabama

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

Okay northerners, here's where I have to step in. There are elements in the southeast that are backwards and contrary and regressive, but saying they'd reinstitute slavery is pretty ridiculous.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

mordy doesn't stand for mordant, does it

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

Is it though? xp

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

It is.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago)

Considering their fairly retrograde views on economics, debt, personal responsibility, their history of human rights violations in both actual slavery and post-emancipation Jim Crow Laws and racial violence, and the extreme economic hit their society would take leaving the United States, I don't think it's totally insane to wonder whether we'd see a reemergence of debt bondage in Alabama.

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago)

It's already in place, it's legal, it's not technically based on skin color, it's called the service sector of American employment, etc etc

WilliamC, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

how much do you think a person would cost, just hypothetically

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

depends on their skills, like could you have a computer programmer slave?

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:30 (twelve years ago)

I mean obv not in alabama

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Winston

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago)

i'm pretty sure Walmartistan will handle the slave situation with professionalism and care.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

http://www.cepro.com/images/uploads/walmart_installations.jpg

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

depends on their skills, like could you have a computer programmer slave?

― iatee, Monday, November 12, 2012 11:30 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I mean obv not in alabama

― iatee, Monday, November 12, 2012 11:31 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah, because Alabama is only home to about a full third of Nasa's engineering force, so you're right...nobody there could possibly understand a computer.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

I read that they use a huge catapult

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

Captain Save-a-Gomer

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

w/ a confederate flag on it

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

I mean obv not in alabama

You could definitely have a computer programmer slave in Alabama. He'd be the smartest computer programmer you've ever met, but he'd also live in Huntsville and have a government job. So that's a problem when they secede.

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

Johnny Fever otm, basically

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

I'm not in favor of secession, but for iatee to keep pretending that parts of the country he doesn't like aren't vital to the nation's economy is consistently one of the most boneheaded things to occur on ilx.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

Is Alabama vital to the nation's economy?

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

if they could find a way to grow a cash crop with low labor costs, idk, they could make it work

if alabama seceded how quickly would they reinstate slavery?

― Mordy, Monday, November 12, 2012 10:14 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

immediately but its the year 2012 and even alabama is a more progressive place - they would allow white people to be enslaved too

― iatee, Monday, November 12, 2012 10:15 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

If Alabama wanted cheap labor so badly, why did they pass one of the most restrictive illegal immigration laws in the country? Crops were withering in the fields out there this year because there were no workers who'd do that job anymore.

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

we didn't say they were smart about it

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

JF, iatee embraced his part as an ilx troll quite a while back, do keep up.

WilliamC, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

alabama gets $2.03 for every tax dollar it pays and things like NASA are basically there because of politix not because there's some natural vitality in the alabama economy

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago)

cool.

On Wednesday, Mr. Obama will meet with corporate executives at the White House as he uses the nation’s fiscal problems to start rebuilding relations with business leaders. Though many of them backed Mitt Romney, scores have formed a coalition to push for a budget compromise similar to the one the president seeks. He hopes to enlist them to persuade Republicans in Congress to accept higher taxes on the assurance that he can deliver Democrats’ votes for future reductions in fast-growing entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

all mods con (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago)

I wish the NYT had asked the administration about Sen. Murray's idea.

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:07 (twelve years ago)

Nothing brings out the alpha-asshole in blue-staters like mocking the South. Andrew O'Hehir:

Maybe the fact that the Christian-Caucasian-libertarian-capitalist-nationalist cultural faction has absorbed another bitter political defeat will spark some new dynamic in American life. But I wouldn’t bet on it. An angry, declining minority that believes itself oppressed can be an unstable and dangerous phenomenon. The worst sin of the secular-multicultural-communitarian-internationalist-environmentalist faction (other than all that oaky California chardonnay) is its smugness and superiority, its sense of historical mission and its confidence that it has nothing to learn from its diminished opponents and bears no responsibility for their plight. Pride goeth before the fall, as a text prized by both sides for different reasons puts it. If we can’t find a way to address the American cultural divide, beyond insults and quadrennial beauty contests, it is sure to destroy us.

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/hey_liberals_you_havent_won_the_culture_war/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:08 (twelve years ago)

ya I don't think only 15% of white people in alabama voted for obama because they were sad about being mocked but it's interesting to learn that you secretly believe what america needs is 'a way to address the american cultural divide' morbs

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:11 (twelve years ago)

the american cultural divide: a collection of states that receive an inordinate amount of money from the government, that historically supported slavery and jim crow, that don't believe in evolution, are against gay marriage, want to ban all abortion, contraception, and teach abstenance-only education, that believe global warming is a myth, that want to defund government social safety net programs, build a wall across the southern border, oppose all gun restrictions, etc. the rest of the united states is far from perfect but i think any defeat that this particular political/social movement suffers is good news for everyone in the world.

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago)

also you can now earn your way out of slavery by being on a team that wins a bcs game

― iatee, Monday, November 12, 2012 11:16 AM (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah honestly i think alabama would run into a lot more problems with the NCAA than the USA over secession. those guys don't fuck around

all mods con (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:16 (twelve years ago)

i don't secretly believe in shit.

by all means continue cheerleading for secessionist tinfoil hat types tho

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:16 (twelve years ago)

"sure to destroy us" is pretty tinfoil

bnw, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

Mordy OTM

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

well it's all a matter of what will destroy us first. NYC underwater is gonna be quite a hit for the elites.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:19 (twelve years ago)

this is so stupid, the country is more tightly knitted together economically and culturally than it ever has been, and differences in ideology that have a chance of making a political difference are comparitively minor

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago)

do you really think O'Hehir was suggesting some sort of political rapprochement on those dead issues?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago)

other than college sports, i can't think of one thing that alabama does/is known for. other than negative things. i don't have anything against the people there. i'm scared of them, but i don't hate them or anything.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago)

apostate william kristol

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:23 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kj59fB9WKus

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fachmkjXcoA

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago)

Fred Wesley is from Mobil Alabama

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago)

yeah yeah people come from there. people come from everywhere. rich musical tradition, blah, blah. i mean lately.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

economically sure, but as far as 'cultural political issues' go, I'm not sure you could say it's more knitted together today than the 80s/90s. dubya and obama were both polarizing figures.

xp

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/03/other-notes-from-alabama-and-mississippi.html

I mean 26% of people believe in evolution, 14% of people think obama's a christian etc. etc. and uh...67% are finally okay w/ interracial marriage. pretending like there's not an enormous cultural divide in this country is kinda ridiculous.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:29 (twelve years ago)

I'm from Mobile, Alabama and I am here to answer any and all questions you might have about this backwoods wonderland.

Gukbe, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:30 (twelve years ago)

i think you have to try to quantify 'enormous'

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:31 (twelve years ago)

...and St Rachel Maddow is not going to fix it. xxp

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:31 (twelve years ago)

I guess I shouldn't be so quick to judge all Alabamans based on the small cross section of smart and kind people I've met from the state. I do know that I'd live in Alabama before San Jose, CA.

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:31 (twelve years ago)

I think those stats are a good place to start w/ that quantification. we live in a country where some people are arguing for gay marriage while other parts still haven't fully got on board w/ interracial marriage.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

67% are not necessarily okay with interracial marriage, but believe it should be legal. The remaining 21% believe it should be illegal.

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

have no doubt large swathes of Alabama are at least prettier than fucking San Jose

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago)

Anybody who would choose to live in Alabama is certifiable.

Interracial marriage was taught as a sin in my Christian High School. My good friend who is reasonably intelligent and nice still doesn't believe in it.

Gukbe, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago)

nobody is going to get me to defend rachel maddow or san jose fwiw

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:35 (twelve years ago)

there's been a major 'divide' of some sort in the u.s. for decades. as crazy as it is i don't think the anti-obama stuff quite measures up to the intensity of the tensions over the civil rights movement or vietnam.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:35 (twelve years ago)

anti-bama vs. anti-O-bama

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:37 (twelve years ago)

well, citizens killed each other with some regularity over the civil rights movement and Vietnam

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:37 (twelve years ago)

That O'Hehir thing is either nonsense or I'm just persnickety today. Also WHY IS HE NOT EVEN MENTIONING AUTHORITARIANISM?

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:38 (twelve years ago)

it was easier to get away with it xp

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:38 (twelve years ago)

Peggy Noonan, 2011:

The other day a Republican political veteran forwarded me a hiring notice from the Obama 2012 campaign. It read like politics as done by Martians. The 'Analytics Department' is looking for 'predictive Modeling/Data Mining' specialists to join the campaign's 'multi-disciplinary team of statisticians,' which will use 'predictive modeling' to anticipate the behavio...r of the electorate. 'We will analyze millions of interactions a day, learning from terabytes of historical data, running thousands of experiments, to inform campaign strategy and critical decisions...

Chicago Tribune article today (not online yet) mentions that the analytics department put a photo of Mars on the wall.

cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

What better way to bring some locales into the 21st Century than by heavily reducing its federal funding for infrastructure, education, health and welfare.

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

wait, what's wrong with san jose?

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:40 (twelve years ago)

the cultural divide we have is a legacy of earlier divides and compared to those it is way more attenuated than it was. that o'hehir piece is pretty dumb.

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

My own fundamental cultural precepts point toward the belief that one side descends from the Enlightenment, more or less, while the other traces its roots (again, more or less) back to the medieval Church.

lol dummy which one do you think you're in?

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

san jose is a place where everyone is a computer programmer, but it is not culturally preferable to alabama

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

san jose is just freeways and tech campuses and some houses that look like boring houses but cost $2m, there is no there there

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:43 (twelve years ago)

the person living in the $2m dollar house bought it from vc funds toward his iphone app

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9S0pzCBkLTk/0.jpg

"I think even the president can agree that the tutorial missions of Assassin's Creed 3 take far too long"

captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

i wish everyone in the scary states well. may god bless them all.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

Maine is the scariest state. You've got the Casper reboot and all of those little shops selling miniature lighthouses next to gray foggy beaches.

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:52 (twelve years ago)

old fishermen in galoshes with hook hands

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:53 (twelve years ago)

i only think of maine from stephen king books so i def believe you

captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:53 (twelve years ago)

what kind of polling does king do before writing those books, I wonder

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago)

Certainly photosofwhitepeoplecrying.com and the like aren't exactly helping with the right thinking minorities are out to get them.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

it's time to tear down the tumblrs that are causing so much strife in america today

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

I mean yeah it's not a major thing but I really don't like the whitepeoplemourningromney thing -- mean-spirited, and very much in the obnoxious tradition of white people using "white" as a pejorative to signify superior racial sensitivity or something.

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:05 (twelve years ago)

I mean I really think the approach shouldn't be "lol white people u lost america" but "there is no reason an america with more room for non-white people has to have less room for white people"

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

do you think that would make a good tumblr?

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago)

Mainly, it's pretty disheartening that "someone says something mean about someone else on the internet" is even considered news.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago)

xxp That's not actually true in the sense of declining privilege, though!

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

lots of white people voted for obama

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

"I think even the president can agree that the tutorial missions of Assassin's Creed 3 take far too long"

― captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, November 12, 2012 12:49 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

dying

max, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago)

the gop operates thanks to and in the interests of a white voting bloc. there is nothing offensive about point that out, even in tumblr form.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago)

I mean it's actually something that *needs* to be talked about more publicly

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/11/us-politics-absurd-britain-george-iii

While the American founding fathers were in conscious reaction against England, they unconsciously echoed its political culture. With the constitution cementing that in place, it means that American politics today is closer to British politics at the time the Americans rebelled than British politics today, and Obama resembles George III more than David Cameron (politically rather than personally, that is). He is both head of state and chief executive, and does not need, or indeed now have, a congressional majority. Like the king, he has to barter with the legislature, using cajolery, bribery or appeals to loyalty

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

what if they are offended by our tumblrs is such concern trolling

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

xxp That's not actually true in the sense of declining privilege, though!

― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Monday, November 12, 2012 1:08 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ok but a lot of the lol white people who tend to actually buy into the "white people losing america" thing aren't all that privileged, and I really doubt the purpose or efficacy of sending the message "sorry working class white guy who no longer has a union job or a pension, you are going to have to give up your privilege."

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

san jose is just freeways and tech campuses and some houses that look like boring houses but cost $2m, there is no there there

― iatee, Monday, November 12, 2012 12:43 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

when i was a kid driving to my grandparents house in san jose it was apricot orchards for miles, now nothin but computer programers as far as the eye can see

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

Yeah plenty of white people. White men, even. But take the crackpot who voted Romney who thinks minorities are out to get him and grab his stuff, and he hears about a website featuring LOL WHITE PEOPLE. Wouldn't that reinforce his worst suspicions.

I get voting demographics shifts and all but framing it like this rather than "LOL RICH PEOPLE" or something else is a dumb trend. Imagine post-Romney win and there's a bunch of "LOL BLACK PEOPLE" websites instead.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

ok but a lot of the lol white people who tend to actually buy into the "white people losing america" thing aren't all that privileged, and I really doubt the purpose or efficacy of sending the message "sorry working class white guy who no longer has a union job or a pension, you are going to have to give up your privilege."

when exactly do you think they should be getting this message?

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

"What if they are offended by our tumblrs" is not the point at all, it's "maybe we should not have a snarky attitude toward everyone who didn't vote for Obama and instead try to figure out how more of them might come to see that Obama represents their interests"

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

obama doesn't represent their interests

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago)

their interests are 'white people don't lose america'

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago)

oh come on

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago)

so, petraeus. are we talking about petraeus here? or not.

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago)

"What if they are offended by our tumblrs" is not the point at all, it's "maybe we should not have a snarky attitude toward everyone who didn't vote for Obama and instead try to figure out how more of them might come to see that Obama represents their interests"

― drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, November 12, 2012 1:14 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

im just gonna wait for them to die personally

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago)

white people going "lol white people" is corny and annoying for reasons i've posted about many times before but feeding a white supremacist's persecution complex is not really one of those reasons

my hands tra cer (some dude), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

CIA Director Resigns xp

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

al otm

max, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/9Q6HD.gif

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

i don't buy the tom frank/kansas/"voting against their interests!!" line, because i take people's stated interests at face value. i think "false consciousness" is a pointless argument. if white panic is what some people are about, then that's what they're about. that's their interest! *dusts off hands*

xp ty lag99n. great thread title.

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

if only we could convince these people who believe interracial marriage should be illegal using calm and patient arguments, and we start and get so close but then no we just screw it all up cause they see the tumblrs making fun of them and then they get so bummed out

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

if only we could stop clinging to our tumblrs and twitters

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

i object to that gif until she does the double vincent vega move and i give in

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

everyone on ilx needs to get on board w/making fun of white people asap

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago)

i'm ok with making fun of at least one white person.

my hands tra cer (some dude), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago)

but include some black people or you'll end up like lena dunham

cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

why is some dude following me around so cruelly making fun of me, i suspect its because hes white

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

::gives lagoon a new hat, waits for him to get attached to it, then throws it in the river::

my hands tra cer (some dude), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

that guardian article re: American political system is really interesting, thx

I had no idea that senators were chosen by the state legislature!

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

Mobile is great to visit. awesome seafood, state's largest flea market on the weekend was great to see when I was there last summer. Downtown has this weird mix of French colonial and Art Deco. No open container laws, etc.

No comic book store, tho.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

come on that lol white people romney voter site was funny. if you didn't think that was funny you extra-white and need to get the prune out your butt.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:40 (twelve years ago)

the pre-eminent comic book store used to be Sincere Comics, and it was the worst place ever. xpost

Gukbe, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:41 (twelve years ago)

ive long suspected that infamous internet truth teller and zing legend some dudes absence from the wdyll thread was an attempt to hide his embarrassing whiteness, but now through this photo i obtained from anonymous internet sources i have proof, as you can see his fascination w/hats is also in full display

http://i.imgur.com/0ULEg.jpg
ilxor.com poster 'some dude'

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:41 (twelve years ago)

that's not me, but it is your hat that i stole

my hands tra cer (some dude), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

this explains so much

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago)

state's largest flea market on the weekend

fwiw, every city in Alabama has what it claims to be the state's largest flea market.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:45 (twelve years ago)

I resent the implication that Bristol Palin, along with her family, is a member of the human species.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

Everything about this is priceless.

That leaves some asking where do I go from where and what about UnSkewedPolls.com. I remain an independent journalist and columnist and will continue to publish articles and commentaries for the readers who read my articles on Examiner.com and my web sites. UnSkewedPolls.com is just one web site and one project I did, and depending on your point of view it was proven wrong, it has run its course or it will fade away. It is merely a web site and only part of what I do and will do. There will be other web sites, and the more important web sites I work with will remain in place.

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

okay i am definitely all for Fleamarketstan.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago)

The flea market was fun, but the number of puppy breeders was off-putting. At least two dudes sold snakes. One of the knife show tables inexplicably had a fully working new pachinko machine, LED screen, etc. No less than six different tables had used and vintage video game systems. Atari Jaguars everywhere.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago)

the fact is that in alabama all fleas are enormous (and ubiquitous)

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago)

Ok i gotta rep for GA.

http://s3-media2.ak.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/rK425o0CmC9_t-P1RqCxNA/l.jpg

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago)

I think everyone who has read my articles and visited the web sites, including those who supported and agreed with them and those who did not.

please tell me this is not a typo

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

georgia is a peach! everyone loves georgia. its sweet like candy. (i have no idea what its like...)

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

Atlanta is fun and polluted

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/5L35d.png

bury me here

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

"and depending on your point of view it was proven wrong."

Gukbe, Monday, 12 November 2012 18:58 (twelve years ago)

^^^ best gucci mane chorus that never happened (xpost)

my hands tra cer (some dude), Monday, 12 November 2012 18:58 (twelve years ago)

holy lolg∞n

Inconceivable (to the entire world) (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

he should start a blog network, unskewed sports, unskewed food...

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:02 (twelve years ago)

I wanted to live in Atlanta for a very long time as a younger person, and then I got the opportunity and now I call it home. It's a pretty nice place. Good food. Reasonably easy to get around in (as long as you're not trying to get around between 4-7pm). I could see myself staying for a long time. It feels more like home to me than other places I've lived as an adult.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

unskewed credit rating sounds like promising market space imo
xp

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

Don't actually understand this point in that Guardian article:

Even worse, since the 17th amendment of 1913, senators have been elected by popular vote. Until then, they had been chosen by state legislatures, as is still true elsewhere.

Why "even worse"? I'm not a fan of the ridiculous structure of the Senate, but I don't get why popular vote is somehow worse than having the legislatures appoint. Has this guy seen any of our state legislatures?

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago)

they should fill the House of Representatives in a manner similar to selecting ppl for jury duty

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

i think the "even worse" is meant to link to this sentence in the next paragraph:

"Direct election of the Senate conferred a wholly unjustified appearance of democratic legitimacy on a wildly unrepresentative body."

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

I think the implication is that the constitution was so shitty that that only came to be in 1913 xp

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

they should fill the House of Representatives in a manner similar to selecting ppl for jury duty

do you really want to be ruled by old people who had nothing better to do

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:14 (twelve years ago)

I mean we kinda are already but at least the democratic process keeps these people one level away from pure power

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago)

http://www.examiner.com/article/we-re-riding-that-long-black-train-to-economic-oblivion

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)

Jesus was a Food Stamps kinda guy.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

Selling your soul should only be done on the free market.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:20 (twelve years ago)

so much for elvis

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:20 (twelve years ago)

I will never forget the man, who instead of saying "I am too busy to perform adequately as a juror" or "I feel a personal bias toward this particular case" to get out of jury duty, chose to say "I do not believe in the American judicial system" with a blank face to the presiding judge.

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:20 (twelve years ago)

i had jury duty the other day and only like a third of the people who were called for that day showed up, so they had to let us go since they didn't have enough people to seat a full jury

ciderpress, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

since the 17th amendment of 1913,

there were others passed that year, eh

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:25 (twelve years ago)

i was the only person out of like 50 people who raised their hand when they asked if anyone would be prejudiced against law enforcement in the case. i think i actually just told that on ile somewhere else. only time i had to go to courthouse for jury thing.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:31 (twelve years ago)

I tried as hard as I could to get onto a DWI jury because I wanted to see a live case but I guess the defendant was a massive racist or something because his lawyer kept digging and digging and digging for things in my background that she could use to disqualify me, finally settling on the fact that I knew something like 10-15 kids growing up who died or were irreparably harmed in alcohol-related incidents, most of which involved drunk drivers

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

when i left the courthouse after being there all day my car had been towed. it was a sign from god. never go to jury duty.

scott seward, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

oh man I want to get on a dwi jury so bad

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

will you be prejudiced against the defendant for driving cars?

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

would it be perjury if I didn't say so?

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

The only time I served (the first of four calls) I ate oatmeal and tried to fart often enough for the attorneys to smell them. I was picked. Just my luck that the case involved a civil suit against a candy company.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago)

the only time I got jury duty I was called to the oakland courthouse and the form told me the time, it was like 6 pm or something, then I went there and the courthouse was closed, and I called the official number again and it said 'your jury duty has been completed'

it was super mysterious

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

if the attorneys are too far away, the farts will diffuse below detection level regardless. You should have valued proximity over productivity

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

I was on a DWI jury once. Dude was caught driving with a suspended license, with open beers in his car. When he was caught, he was 30 days away from his license being reinstated. We found him guilty. It was kind of infuriating, though, to later learn he had 6 prior DWIs on his record; these were inadmissible as evidence. But his half-empty beer can -- now about two years old -- was admissible. Stank up the jury room.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

I sat on a county grand jury all day, twice a week, for three months. Y'all are lazy.

C-3PO Sharkey (Phil D.), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

i think the "even worse" is meant to link to this sentence in the next paragraph:

"Direct election of the Senate conferred a wholly unjustified appearance of democratic legitimacy on a wildly unrepresentative body."

Ah. Well, that's silly. I agree with the "wildly unrepresentative" part, but I can't think of anything about the Senate that would be better with appointed members and I can think of a lot of ways it could/would make things worse.

xp:
My only time on jury duty I think the defense wanted me because I said I had a lot of friends who were public defenders. But I still voted to convict the guy...

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

I worked a temp job once where i was hired for a mock trial, some car company trying to test their legal metal for a really sad accident that happened. Our jury decided in their favor because everything they did was legal but it was pretty eye-opening to see the legal system at work. It seem like 10% facts and 90% presentation is what really counts.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago)

fyi, having relatives that work in law enforcement is a good opening to getting out of jury duty (I had to argue with the lawyer that my retired police officer 2nd cousin and my then-probation officer 1st cousin did not bias me towards or against automatically believing the word of law enforcement professional)

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago)

legal metal should totally be a new genre

Nhex, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

barristercore

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:50 (twelve years ago)

Tortsoise.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

so is wave of anti-erskine bowles pieces a good sign that maybe he won't be the next treasury sec or a sign that he's almost definitely the next treasury sec? plz god the former

balls, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

I walked out of the courtroom having been sentenced (well, suspended judgment) for a dwi and someone was ticketing my parked car because the meter ran out. At that point, I was totally cool with paying a parking ticket, some things are just not that big of a deal.

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

it was iatee writing the ticket iirc

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

the ticket said "you have a car, fuck you ($100000000000000000000000)"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago)

sometimes I think it would be awesome to be a traffic cop in new york, but there are quotas etc.

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago)

I dun think bowles is gonna be treasury sec

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

about as likely as Condi Rice being sec of state

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:55 (twelve years ago)

without reading any of them, i kinda feel like that's just the press trying to fill the "erskine bowles treasury sec" SEO slot

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

keep in mind that the press loves centrist fucks like Bowles.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

a lot of people are talking about erskine bowles as treasury secretary. will erskine bowles be the next treasury secretary? read our insightful, no-holds-barred take on erskine bowles, possible future treasury secretary.

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:57 (twelve years ago)

Still laughing about that Peggy Noonan being confused about data mining quote upthread. Of my friends on the campaign, one was working on integrating GIS voter data from fifty separate state systems, each of which did things differently. The idea that the campaign was reading tea leaves with made-up numbers is pretty far off of reality.

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:57 (twelve years ago)

more like Bowels, amirite

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:58 (twelve years ago)

the press is also biased towards people that people have heard of because a speculative article about somebody who isn't really a public figure isn't as juicy

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 19:58 (twelve years ago)

erskine bowels and jury doodie

Eccsame the Photon Guys (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 November 2012 19:59 (twelve years ago)

I wonder what it must be like to be Peggy Noonan for a day -- twenty-four hours characterized by swoons of enthusiasm that end with invitations to talk shows to discuss how my swoons are actually the swoons of the body politic. The body politic of course would look like 200 million Ronald Reagans.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:02 (twelve years ago)

1,000 pts of right

pplains, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:08 (twelve years ago)

http://s3.amazonaws.com/dk-production/images/9972/large/conservativeisland.jpg?1352608041

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

bein peggy noonan for a day is the best job in the world is what youre saying

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

Joe Bide does aight

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

The body politic of course would look like 200 million Ronald Reagans.

this is the worst takeoff of "Being John Malkovitch" imaginable

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

Being Ronald Reagan would mean a hearty breakfast every morning, photo ops, reading things from 5X7 cards, and going to bed early with Mommy. What's there to hate?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

Another story on the state of things. I didn't know the last bit about Ailes and McConnell:

The sexual harassment scandal around Cain offered a vivid example of the different goals of the two groups. To the entertainment-based right, it was a great opportunity to rally the faithful against a purportedly liberal media targeting a black conservative. It touched almost every erogenous zone for the likes of Rush Limbaugh. But for the operatives and thinkers, the story threatened to tarnish the GOP with a sex scandal and make a martyr out of a marginal figure they were already cringing over before POLITICO reported the harassment charges.

Long after the primary ended, the entertainment-based right was still promoting figures that many in the GOP believe are harmful to the party’s brand. Take Donald Trump, who made regular appearances on “Fox & Friends” all year and delighted in pushing the discredited idea that Obama wasn’t born in America. Why energize black voters and turn off moderates broadly by elevating a buffoonish figure questioning the president’s legitimacy? Because it’s good box office. (To be sure, other nonpartisan outlets, including POLITICO, not to mention Romney himself, did their share of enabling Trump).

“It’s like a weird version of identity politics for people who like trash culture and reality TV,” said Douthat of Trump.

This same financial-political tension also arose two years ago in one of the most high-profile GOP Senate primaries in the country between Grayson and Rand Paul. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, worried that his hand-picked candidate wasn’t getting equal time on Fox to make his case, called Fox President Roger Ailes to ask that Grayson get similar treatment as the oft-interviewed Paul, according to a source familiar with the call. Ailes, who consulted on McConnell’s first Senate race, had tough news for his old friend: Paul was just a better draw.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago)

Really want to wipe the image of touching Limbaugh's erogenous zone from my brain

By the end of my second term, Gingrich said... (Dan Peterson), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

a) I was referencing the scene where Malkovitch goes through the portal and finds himself in a world full of Malkovitches that just say "Malkovitch", but that's immaterial really since:

b) in 2012, "Being Ronald Regan" would consist of lying in a coffin, decomposing

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

maybe when we die, we really do go through a portal into ronald reagan's coffin

Z S, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

I tried and failed to think of a "Reagan Reagan" quip.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

i loved this description of trump:

"He played very well with blue-collar-type Republicans, and the campaign saw that," said one source in Trump's camp. "If you have no education, and you work with your hands, you like him. It's like, 'Wow, if I was rich, that's how I would live!' The girls, the cars, the fancy suits. His ostentatiousness is appealing to them."

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago)

http://nofaceperformance.org/ronald_reagan_gif_1.gif

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

ronnie sad-eyes bj

Mordy, Monday, 12 November 2012 20:48 (twelve years ago)

they've really got their finger on the pulse of the working man, there

loving that vibrating bologna loaf of a man

d-_-b (mh), Monday, 12 November 2012 20:55 (twelve years ago)

we should really do a vbl auto-replace gif for trump

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

GOP soul searching continues

grover norquist: romney lost because he's a "poopyhead"

http://gawker.com/5959763/that-one-time-grover-norquist-called-romney-a-poopyhead-on-live-tv

captain angeroo (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 12 November 2012 21:12 (twelve years ago)

there was some brief poopy discussion of that on the election thread a little while ago.

When asked whether Obama's electoral success was a mandate to enact his tax plan, which involves raising taxes for the wealthiest Americans, Norquist offered this gem: that we voted for Obama because his campaign successfully branded Mitt Romney as a "poopyhead."

gawker missed a golden opportunity to say "Norquist offered this nugget" rather than "this gem", imo

Z S, Monday, 12 November 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

loool

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 12 November 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

Which of the above scenarios do you believe is closer to the truth of what actually happened in the 2012 election?

Scenario 1 -- Massive vote fraud
Scenario 2 -- Some vote fraud
Scenario 3 -- Obama legitimately reelected

Please click submit below to finish the survey.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 November 2012 21:34 (twelve years ago)

Scenario 4 -- "Poopyhead"

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

has the right given up on blaming sandy+christie

goole, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:18 (twelve years ago)

come now, there's plenty of blame for everyone

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

christie is still one of like 3-4 national figures in the republican party right now so they aren't gonna want to shame him too hard

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:22 (twelve years ago)

can someone photoshop "Marco Christie."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

how many national dem figures are there?

1) obama
2) biden
3) hillary
4) cuomo?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:32 (twelve years ago)

schumer, bill clinton, harry reid, pelosi

beef richards (Mr. Que), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago)

mayor dude from Texas is aiming for national status

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:34 (twelve years ago)

does Franken count, since he used to be a nationally-known actor/comedian?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:36 (twelve years ago)

sherrod brown, elizabeth warren, al franken

balls, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago)

Here's an article on Ohio gerrymandering. GOP has a 3-1 representative advantage despite the state being evenly divided.

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2012/11/in_evenly_split_ohio_redistric.html

road to per diem (brownie), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

I would say there are a few tiers, obama, biden, clinton, reid and pelosi are 'tier 1' in a 'even people who don't follow the news/politics have heard of these people' (tho the recognition numbers for the last two might be kinda depressing)

then cuomo, schumber, franken, warren, jerry brown, etc. are all kinda tier 2, people who follow the news have heard of these people

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:39 (twelve years ago)

yup, only gonna get worse if/when supremes overturn voting rights act

balls, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago)

haha schumber

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago)

sry jerry brown you have to be this important to ride on tier two

lag∞n, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:42 (twelve years ago)

I would imagine a higher % of people have heard of jerry brown than know he is currently governor of california

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:42 (twelve years ago)

Deval Patrick may get turned into a national figure at some future point; I don't think he's quite there yet but I may be undercounting his national exposure

Mayor of Columbus Michael Coleman was being fast-tracked to the national stage before his wife's brush with the law

also: Cory Booker

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:43 (twelve years ago)

tier 2 also contains anyone w/ a scandal in the news over the last year or two, that's really the best way to build yr recognition numbers

iatee, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

aka the Weiner-Spitzer Gambit

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

"Cory Booker" sounds like the protagonist of an eighties sitcom.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago)

Corey Booker Might Lose!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago)

more like Cory Booker Stole Your Girlfriend

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:49 (twelve years ago)

Saw a mention earlier of something I don't know to be true or not, but do you not have to be a seated member of the house to be chose the speaker? Some goon was saying that this would be a perfect time for LOL ALLEN WEST to be given the position, but if that's really a thing in the house rules then WTF.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 12 November 2012 22:49 (twelve years ago)

Speaker Allen West would be a helluva great time.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:51 (twelve years ago)

I'll start the direct-mail and social media campaigns now.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 November 2012 22:51 (twelve years ago)

(Slate) More surprisingly, even Romney's fellow losers in last week's election seem to be gaining Facebook fans at the same time he's losing them. Dewey noted that Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein have seen increases in their follower counts since Nov. 6. That suggests that a lot of people aren't just unfollowing Romney because he lost. They're removing him from their list of "likes" out of disappointment or spite--or, perhaps, because "liking" Romney just isn't cool anymore.

Not out of spite, which is not a good reason--I know that from Seinfeld. Also, "anymore" is funny if it's meant ironically, which I assume it is. It's even funnier if it's not.

clemenza, Monday, 12 November 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

Doug Ireland (longtime gay muckraker) suggests gay progressives hold Obama accountable, toss their HRC black tie:

http://gaycitynews.com/back-from-the-abyss/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 00:45 (twelve years ago)

susan rice reportedly a lock at state. gop will lose its shit.

balls, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:40 (twelve years ago)

is there any chance Cory Booker seeks the presidency in 2016? because that would cause the GOP to lose their shit so bad and it would be really funny.

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:42 (twelve years ago)

driving around the country fixing citizens flat tires, picking up litter

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:43 (twelve years ago)

cory booker's a joke guys

balls, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:45 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:46 (twelve years ago)

'really good at twitter' / everyone come stay at my place I will buy you burritos / etc doesn't scale to state office let alone a national campaign.

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:48 (twelve years ago)

wow. missed all the secession talk in the Internet today. 1000% in favor of that.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:49 (twelve years ago)

booker vs christie will be such a great race tho, just as a spectator

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:49 (twelve years ago)

and people who are jokes never ever run in the presidential primaries

xp

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:50 (twelve years ago)

'really good at twitter' / everyone come stay at my place I will buy you burritos / etc doesn't scale to state office let alone a national campaign.

Post-Citizens United though

Well, ILE be damned! (seandalai), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:50 (twelve years ago)

haha

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:51 (twelve years ago)

for sure feel like the corey brewer debunkers on this message board are being no fun

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:52 (twelve years ago)

don't see him jumping in as soon as 2016 but i could see Booker at least being on a ticket as VP at some point -- assuming that the Chris Rock "if we had a black vice president and a white president, i couldn't WAIT to kill the president" rule doesn't apply post-Obama

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:53 (twelve years ago)

FBI officials declined to identify the agent, who is now under investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility, the internal-affairs arm of the FBI, according to two officials familiar with the matter.

haha maybe i was right about the gov't keeping track of every employees extramarital affairs

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 01:59 (twelve years ago)

a good vp doesn't draw that much attention to him(/her)self

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:05 (twelve years ago)

lol wrong thread (xp)

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:08 (twelve years ago)

don't most VPs spend a couple years going "HEY LOOK AT ME I SHOULD BE PRESIDENT" before settling for #2?

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:09 (twelve years ago)

yeah but they fail at it!

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:09 (twelve years ago)

i guess Cheney did that but it was in a quiet, menacing snarl in the ear of a terrified George w bush at a deserted Denny's in Casper, wyoming

Lamborghini mercy, yo sledge she's so percy (m bison), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:10 (twelve years ago)

Can those of you with GOP relatives please send them this clip of His Highness:

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/from-god-himself.html

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:11 (twelve years ago)

iatee that makes no sense.

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:15 (twelve years ago)

^^phrase i would just keep on the clipboard if i allowed myself to bother even wasting my time talking to iatee more often

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:15 (twelve years ago)

if iatee means they fail at being nominated for prez, then yeah

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:18 (twelve years ago)

who let some dude into the politics thread anyway

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago)

this are not many times when i consider "your mom" an appropriate or even effective response, but this is one of those times.

my hands tra cer (some dude), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:24 (twelve years ago)

please spare us, this much sharp wit is too much for this lil thread

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:25 (twelve years ago)

also the 100 best cbs sitcoms of the 00s are not gonna organize themselves

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:26 (twelve years ago)

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/318/347/a39.gif

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:29 (twelve years ago)

guys.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A7jCdDtCYAAMttg.jpg

all mods con (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:30 (twelve years ago)

yesssssssss

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:30 (twelve years ago)

haha how did you end up with one?

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:31 (twelve years ago)

a kid i was playing basketball with tonight put it on as we were all leaving and i gave him $20 on the spot

all mods con (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:32 (twelve years ago)

you mayyy have been able to bargain him down

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:33 (twelve years ago)

haha awesome way to go for the gold kev

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:35 (twelve years ago)

It was worth it, imo

d-_-b (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:39 (twelve years ago)

i did ask him if he knew about the whole thing and he said he figured it out when he was getting yelled at by his neigbors and friends for working for her campaign. don't know if he got paid for it or what

all mods con (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:41 (twelve years ago)

haha he totally got paid for it

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:43 (twelve years ago)

Is that a spigot on a can of Mercurochrome?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:43 (twelve years ago)

from left to right that would be my contact lens solution, my water faucet, deodorant, something to put my contacts in, a bottle of multivitamins...an empty bottle of contact lens soution, and some scope

all mods con (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:49 (twelve years ago)

liquid LSD, beer tap, poppers, pipe case, bottle of amphetamines

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:50 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/12/president-obamas-cabinet-whos-in-whos-out/

Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:51 (twelve years ago)

"a kid i was playing basketball with tonight put it on as we were all leaving and i gave him $20 on the spot" = "I paid him to spend the night"

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:55 (twelve years ago)

he was a little guy, he's actually still wearing the shirt in that picture

all mods con (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:56 (twelve years ago)

I love you
you wear my shirt

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 02:57 (twelve years ago)

http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate/109972/the-auto-bailout-didnt-decide-ohio

bailout was probably something of an oversold narrative in the end

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 03:41 (twelve years ago)

Someone I know just predicted that before the end of 2013 the GOP congress will try to impeach Obama for some sort of trumped-up bullshit around benghazi. He may have a point. It would follow their past m.o. for sure.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 03:57 (twelve years ago)

god, imagine if there was ever an actual scandal in the administration. the impeachment vote would be set up within months.

running like a young deer (symsymsym), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 09:23 (twelve years ago)

Kerry looks strong again:

With his patrician bearing and Massachusetts roots, he was an obvious stand-in for Mr. Romney during debate preparation. While the president’s lackluster first debate almost capsized his campaign, his aides said they did not blame Mr. Kerry.

Nor does the loss of his Senate seat appear quite as problematic as it did before last Tuesday. Senator Brown, who was defeated by Elizabeth Warren, left the door open to another run. But some political analysts in Massachusetts say he might be more inclined to run for governor, given that the state once elected a fiscally conservative, socially moderate Republican — Mr. Romney — to that post. Even if he did run for the Senate, Mr. Brown would face a robust bench of Democrats.

Among the potential candidates for Mr. Kerry’s seat is Gov. Deval Patrick, who is close to Mr. Obama. On Friday, Mr. Patrick and his wife, Diane, flew to Washington for a private dinner with Mr. Obama and his wife, Michelle, at the White House.

Mr. Patrick may have his eye on a cabinet post like attorney general. But there are other formidable Democrats, like Representative Michael E. Capuano and Martha Coakley, who lost to Mr. Brown but has since rehabilitated her image as the state attorney general.

“I think the administration could feel relatively confident that they will hold on to the seat,” said Thomas Whalen, a political historian at Boston University. “When you look back on Brown, it was a special election against an exceptionally weak Democratic opponent.”

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 12:11 (twelve years ago)

totally not worth the risk.

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 13:33 (twelve years ago)

maybe there will be a reverse scandal where it's revealed that the GOP has had an Obama Impeachment Kit ready to go since January 2009. 160+ pages, and all you have to do is fill in the little paragraph near the beginning that says what he did wrong and revise the dates.

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 13:55 (twelve years ago)

god, imagine if there was ever an actual scandal in the administration. the impeachment vote would be set up within months minutes.

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:35 (twelve years ago)

I think there will be nonstop ~impeachment talk~ but no actual proceedings. in either case the only real goal is to sully his reputation, so why take on any real risk of things backfiring (and they would)

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:39 (twelve years ago)

Kerry for Defense?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:42 (twelve years ago)

do we really want a Secretary of Defense who freaks out and runs away every time someone lights a match?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:45 (twelve years ago)

is that a fart joke?

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:46 (twelve years ago)

Frankenstein joke, but I'll allow fart joke

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:48 (twelve years ago)

wasn't kerry also involved in a speedboat incident in vietnam? iirc there were a bunch of orphans on a boat under fire from the evil viet cong. even with the bullets flying, kerry kept telling the orphans to make him a snack. when they eventually refused to do so and took cover from the fire, he then took off in a speedboat down the river, leaving them to die.

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:50 (twelve years ago)

he never got that snack

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:50 (twelve years ago)

which eventually cost him the 2004 election, according to some political experts

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

I heard he smuggled snacks back to the us in soldiers' coffins.

sug ones (omar little), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

brando et it, and the kids. and the speedboat.

bill paxman (darraghmac), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:52 (twelve years ago)

never forget

http://airpadrekiteboarding.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/john-kerry-kiteboards.gif

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:54 (twelve years ago)

if you look closely there's a little dribble of taco bell hot sauce running down his sleeve there

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:55 (twelve years ago)

wasn't kerry also involved in a speedboat incident in vietnam? iirc there were a bunch of orphans on a boat under fire from the evil viet cong. even with the bullets flying, kerry kept telling the orphans to make him a snack. when they eventually refused to do so and took cover from the fire, he then took off in a speedboat down the river, leaving them to die.

That's the stupidest, falsest, most inaccurate story I've read on this thread yet.



It was a swiftboat.

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:55 (twelve years ago)

nah, nah, it was a speedboat

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

definitely a speedboat

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

no no no, it was Taylor Swift

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

speedboats are pretty swift iirc

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

john kerry then windsurfed away from the battle while eating taco bell

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:58 (twelve years ago)

I miss her!

http://www.codexmagica.com/images/teresa_heinz-kerry.jpg

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 14:59 (twelve years ago)

Typically, he windsurfed away before he didn't windsurf away. (xpost)

clemenza, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago)

John Kerry killed pat Tillman and then designed the pat Tillman statue.

sug ones (omar little), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:01 (twelve years ago)

john kerry is when its ok to hate rich people again

bnw, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:13 (twelve years ago)

re fiscal cliff discussions, Debbie Wasserman Schultz is not a very effective spokeperson for Dems. I saw her stumbling over a question on Morning Joe re Paul Krugman saying lets go over the fiscal cliff. She tried to provide the standard inside the beltway Obamaesque answer of we don't want to approach the cliff, we want to be bipartisan and reach a compromise that benefits everyone, but she wasn't very convincing. Plus her phrasing about trimming around the margins, while pleasing to Scarborough et. al. was predictable in a Obama grand bargain way--the poor are just the margins that can be trimmed.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

every time Wasserman-Schultz changes her 'do it takes a few days for the rest of her to catch up.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

the tricky thing is that even if the dems plan to go over the cliff no matter what, it's in their best interest to look like willing partners to avoid it as long as possible. that way republicans take the heat for failing to compromise. obama might already be planning to go over the fiscal cliff and still figures it would look best if he entered negotiations.

Mordy, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

Is there a Thelma&Louise fiscal cliff gif yet?

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

160+ pages, and all you have to do is fill in the little paragraph near the beginning that says what he did wrong and revise the dates.

works for 5 presidents running, btw

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

http://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/the-possible-barack-mitt-show

Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

There are other formidable Democrats, like Representative Michael E. Capuano and Martha Coakley, who lost to Mr. Brown but has since rehabilitated her image as the state attorney general.

srsly if you have to include coakley on yr deep bench then you dont have a deep bench

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

^^^

Murtha Cookley should remain attorney general and stay far far away from the Senate

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

Capuano, OTOH, is my rep and I like him

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

if scott brown becomes senator again im gonna be so disgusted

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

it's so not worth it

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

there are 300 million people in america surely you can pick one of those 300 million people who doesn't end up putting scott brown in the senate

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

I offer my services

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

Was gonna suggest that

Infamous dickbiscuits (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

t/s morbs as sec of defense vs morbs as sec of state

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

Sec of State, just for the countless pages of diplomatic cables consisting of Dennis Perrin tweets.

C-3PO Sharkey (Phil D.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

General Post General Post Election/US Politics Thread

cruel silver of hope (Eazy), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

it's going to be tough for dems to keep senate in 2014 - even if they could replace kerry in a special election why throw away a sure thing?

Mordy, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

make scott brown the secdef

max, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

everyone is making fun of you maybe just stop talking for a while http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/ryan-it-looked-like-we-stood-pretty-good

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

Victoria Jackson ‏@vicjackshow
White people (statistically) don't have more children than they can take care of without outside assistance. It's called RESPONSIBILITY.

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago)

she's not racist, she's just getting facts out there

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

also, she's racist

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

that too

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

at this point i think she's brain damaged

Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

you're assuming her brain was ever in a different state

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

wingnuts discovering stats (statistically) is one of the hilarious side effects of this election

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

math

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

according to my model there is a 70% chance obama was born in kenya

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

lol a friend retweeted a link to Romney's tech lead with the comment "well, he said 'data' about twenty times and 'parity' once, he sounds legit"

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

according to my model there is a 70% chance obama was born in kenya

that model is... Cindy Crawford

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

oh, here we go: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/12/romney-digital-director-pushes-back-against-critics-of-data-and-it-failure/

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

“This isn’t a zero sum game,” he told The Daily Caller. “One side doesn’t have 100 percent of the good ideas, and one side doesn’t have 100 percent of the bad ideas.”

quote is missing a "usually"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

He then posed a hypothetical question: ”If we had won, what article would you be writing right now?”

“It’d be about how we harnessed online advertising, turned out our votes, how we engaged online at a higher rate than the Obama campaign, how we had a high percentage of people engaged throughout the process, how in six months we built an operation to rival the most sophisticated digital operation in the history of the country,” said Moffatt.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/12/romney-digital-director-pushes-back-against-critics-of-data-and-it-failure/#ixzz2C7bys6pO

OMG THIS GUY

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

“We had five integrated databases with eight terabytes of data on 191 million people. That’s what big data is,” said Moffatt

For comparison -- not apples to apples since it's a data center stat, but still. via twitter:

4Gb/s, 10k req/s, 2k nodes, 3 datacenters, 180TB and 8.5 billion req. Design, deploy, dismantle in 583 days to elect the President.

8TB of data versus 180TB

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

DATA?

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

Hahahah

Deport Everyone That Signed A Petition To Withdraw Their State From The United States Of America.

C-3PO Sharkey (Phil D.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

in the bigger picture its not about the size of your data dick, a lot of it is 'democrats have been more willing to use cutting edge social science research / do experimental things w/ the information'

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

He then posed a hypothetical question: ”If we had won, what article would you be writing right now?”

“It’d be about how we harnessed online advertising, turned out our votes, how we engaged online at a higher rate than the Obama campaign, how we had a high percentage of people engaged throughout the process, how in six months we built an operation to rival the most sophisticated digital operation in the history of the country,” said Moffatt.

"Yes but... you lost."
"SHUT UP DATA DATA DATA EIGHT TERABYTES"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

the Obama number I mentioned was just a dude mentioning on twitter how much shit he'd put together at work, not interview bragging

poor Romney campaign guy bragging up their shit -- doesn't even mention that one of their major campaign applications was completely outsourced

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

All bashful bout the size of his data dick, still trying to re-assure himself like the rest of these guys are doing

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago)

Still haven't heard for sure who did the programming on ORCA -- one of the rumors going was that it was done by an Accenture (IT contractor) group in India

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago)

oh look who's changing his tune:

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal on Monday called on Republicans to “stop being the stupid party” and make a concerted effort to reach a broader swath of voters with an inclusive economic message that pre-empts efforts to caricature the GOP as the party of the rich.

. . .

“We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything,” Jindal told POLITICO in a 45-minute telephone interview. “We cannot be, we must not be, the party that simply protects the rich so they get to keep their toys.”

He was just as blunt on how the GOP should speak to voters, criticizing his party for offending and speaking down to much of the electorate.

“It is no secret we had a number of Republicans damage our brand this year with offensive, bizarre comments — enough of that,” Jindal said. “It’s not going to be the last time anyone says something stupid within our party, but it can’t be tolerated within our party. We’ve also had enough of this dumbed-down conservatism. We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.”

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:51 (twelve years ago)

i have 1tb of data

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

http://www.mwctoys.com/images/review_sttng_1.jpg

Come Into My Layer (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

It's almost like the statscock has been repurposed.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal on Monday called on Republicans to “stop being the stupid party”...

..."We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.”

Alternate headline: Jindal says GOP is currently a stupid party, simplistic, doesn't trust the intelligence of the American people, and insults the intelligence of the voters

Z S, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

don't know why the intelligent young tech people in the country didn't want to work for the Romney campaign

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

http://www.npr.org/2012/11/12/164979755/new-technologies-boosted-obama-campaigns-efforts

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

this tit-for-tat whitehouse.gov petition shit is start to remind me of

http://www.theonion.com/articles/peeing-calvin-decals-now-recognized-as-vital-chann,386/

goole, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

8 TB capacity is like, what, $400-450 at a Fry's sale?

Still, data don't mean shit with a wack infrastructure and analytical methods

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

Can I get a sticker of Calvin peeing on a secession petition? Why not? I thought this was America!

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 17:00 (twelve years ago)

it's also important to remember that there are plenty of other reasons why obama was gonna win, this is more just symbolic of the bigger picture gop bad information loop

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago)

like as 'bad' as it was I'm sure the overall gotv effort was probably comparable to bush 2004 or whatever, not that you can really compare those things. but it definitely wasn't the best they could have had for their money. but the gop isn't run like a business, it's run by a bunch of people who are trying to extract money from a business.

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 17:06 (twelve years ago)

xpost Is that Data with the world's smallest violin?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago)

I offer my services

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:01 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"And who's secretary of state? Jerry Lewis?!"

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 18:25 (twelve years ago)

I didn't understand that at all. xp

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

The sequel to this thread should be called "let me Barack your body, girl."

Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 18:47 (twelve years ago)

Mike Huckabee ("Obama voters are going to hell") calling for a kinder, gentler GOP.

Bobby Jindal (vouchers for schools that teach man and dinosaurs totally hung out, Bob Jones "University" Press) calling for GOP to “stop being the stupid party.”

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:17 (twelve years ago)

man i get bummed hearing about huckabee craziness because i am watching him on the daily show right now and he's always just so genial

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

that's how he gets you

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:21 (twelve years ago)

dude is bugfuck crazy

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:21 (twelve years ago)

Huckabee is the type of dude who would invite you to dinner, ask you all kinds of sincere, heartfelt questions about your family and your job, offhandedly mention the lethal dose of cyanide he put in your lemonade, and then offer you a nice slice of fresh-out-the-oven homemade pie.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

He tones his batschtick down around Stewart, and Stewart's too goddamn nice to him.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:25 (twelve years ago)

He tones his batschtick down around Stewart, and Stewart's too goddamn nice to him.

this is undoubtedly true I know

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:29 (twelve years ago)

Huckabee is the type of dude who would invite you to dinner, ask you all kinds of sincere, heartfelt questions about your family and your job, offhandedly mention the lethal dose of cyanide he put in your lemonade, and then offer you eat the nice slice of fresh-out-the-oven homemade pie he baked for you.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:30 (twelve years ago)

typical fundie evangelcal maneuver: suck you in with their pizza parties and Family Life Center game room/ roller skating rink, then explain to you why you're going to burn in hell for all enternity.

if Stewart's show were just 10 minutes longer...

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 19:36 (twelve years ago)

Jon Stewart sucks the dick of our awesome Pentagon, fuck the bastard; go back to interviewing Jennifer Love-Hewitt.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:02 (twelve years ago)

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/semicolon

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

your second clause has no subject, only a predicate

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

therefore it is a dependent clause

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

therefore you should not have used a semicolon

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

all three of your posts should have a capitalized first word and a period at the end fyi

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

it's an imperative sentence; it has an implied subject

max, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

can't understand what any of you are saying because I can't read, also what year is this

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

it's an imperative sentence; it has an implied subject

dude i know

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

oh; dear

max, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

keep mr. que out of our colons

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

keep your laws; off my body

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

Al Qaeda you; done a bad; thing when you missed

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

(Carmaig de Forest ref)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

it's getting; offensive; dude

Mordy, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

God; damn; America

(sorry it aint 1967 anymore)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:16 (twelve years ago)

see you in 45 minutes

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

Jon Stewart sucks the dick of our awesome Pentagon, fuck the bastard; go back to interviewing Jennifer Love-Hewitt.

He's not that bad. Compared to pretty much every other national network TV correspondent/reporter, he's I.F. fucking Stone.

And surely, you must appreciate his frequent Jerry references/homages.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

Morbs has a very strict "exactly what I want or NOTHING AT ALL" policy

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:36 (twelve years ago)

I suspect that folks who climb the ladder of success into the rarified social atmosphere where they rub elbows with the elite who run the country soon discover that many of the people they thought were brainless goobers or soulless knobs can actually be quite charming and have depths of thought and motive they carefully conceal from public view. If one isn't careful, it easy to become a captive to their charms.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

I got rid of TV about 18 months ago

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

But youtube you shall always have with you, as jesus said.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:48 (twelve years ago)

cmon jon stewart's not dumb. if his interview segment becomes a trap for politicians he's gonna be stuck with movie stars 4 days a week.

xp

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:48 (twelve years ago)

his proper destiny

politician and athlete interviews should be banned from the face of the Earth

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:50 (twelve years ago)

he couldnt even stick w/ calling Harry Truman a war criminal, and HST's been dead for 40 years.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago)

see you in 45 minutes

― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, November 13, 2012 8:19 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

more like 30 :/

beef richards (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

are you guys inhaling paint thinner or just imagining 'I quit' straightedge?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:54 (twelve years ago)

contentfree poli threads are fun now that all yr illusions have been stripped away

http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2012/11/second-time-as-tragedy.html

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:55 (twelve years ago)

1.) that dude has weird friends and
2.) can't believe he could click on the "publish post" button with a straight face

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

Think I'm gonna start a blog where I'm really self-righteous about everything but I'll put it through a wearied, cynical filter so it seems more enlightened. A certain demographic of people will love it because people in general love it when we reduce complex situations to a very simple black and white so we can know how to feel at all times.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

it's kinda hilarious that morbz keeps trying to 'zing' ilx posters for being sincere and then continues to unironically promote this talentless humorless hack

Mordy, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

srsly though I feel like FDR did as much or more than Obama has to turn the USA into an authoritarian technocracy.

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:02 (twelve years ago)

Instead of faux-weeping at his moron Democrat friends' contentment with Obama, Perrin should rejoice in the fact that leftist movements happen under Democratic Presidents, not Republican ones.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

^LOL

American leaders being boring middle-management killers is pretty simple. Some things are.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

Tell yourself that. It makes it a lot easier.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

go to hell

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:06 (twelve years ago)

would also be awesome if bad people went to hell and good people went to heaven wouldn't it

Gukbe, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

Topic was more fun when it was about semicolons.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:08 (twelve years ago)

what happened to the morbs who was pleading for cultural understanding and sensitivity yesterday

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

TOO FUNNY

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:10 (twelve years ago)

everybody accidentally breaks character sometimes

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:10 (twelve years ago)

http://blog.al.com/live/2012/11/alabama_secessionist_says_work.html

“Derrick B.,” the man who started a petition seeking Alabama’s withdrawal from the U.S., is a truck driving, knife collecting former owner of a topless car wash who describes himself as “an absolute Libertarian.”

goole, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:17 (twelve years ago)

post-american alabama might actually work out pretty good for that guy

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

Belcher blamed the government for shutting down his former business. Belcher said his Euro Details car wash, which featured topless women, was successful for a decade on Halls Mill Road in Mobile. But he said he was arrested and charged with obscenity by city officials in 2001.

“The government ripped my business away, and now they’re choking America to death with rules and regulations,” he said.

goole, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

topless women = "euro"

ooh la la

goole, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:21 (twelve years ago)

This is just what Thomas Jefferson had in mind, Derrick B, except for the topless car wash part maybe.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:21 (twelve years ago)

surely that would be legal in nevada

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:22 (twelve years ago)

Wow, so Obama's mayor of Alabama.

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

Alobama.

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

srsly how many future wars could be prevented w/ better education about the difference between local, state and federal government regulations

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

can't wait for my small business owner dad to cite these examples

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:26 (twelve years ago)

america really does have way too much government its just shitty local governments

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago)

so romneys super secret big data operation was called orca and obamas was... narwhal http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-obamas-big-data-operation

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:06 (twelve years ago)

#seapunk

goole, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:07 (twelve years ago)

posers

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:07 (twelve years ago)

Obama's a B-52s fan?

(there goes a BIKINI WHALE)

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:11 (twelve years ago)

if you guys want all the Obama secrets I think I can buy some recently unemployed dudes some beer

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:12 (twelve years ago)

yes plz, will paypal you beer reimbursement if the tales are nerdy enough

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

Interestng piece/study that suggests that well maybe nothing's the matter with kansas after all:

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/red-versus-blue-in-a-new-light/?hp

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

hopefully it works out this week, the dude I'm thinking of just got back to town

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:27 (twelve years ago)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/11/13/opinion/13gelman-sex/13gelman-sex-blog480.jpg

Tumblr nonwites

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:27 (twelve years ago)

empty spaces = no exit poll data presumably

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:29 (twelve years ago)

No, they seceded already.

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

nobody living in those states iirc

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

lol at northern new england suddenly disappearing off the non white map

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

thank god kansas decided to stick around, otherwise it would be impossible to drive cross country

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:31 (twelve years ago)

just a massive gaping miles-deep chasm leading to the mantle

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:32 (twelve years ago)

good description of Idaho senators

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago)

if you want to get from alabama to north carolina you have to jump

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago)

I went to Birmingham for 3 hours and whew

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/mKAS6.gif

pplains, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago)

Dave Wasserman ‏@Redistrict
In the last few hours, Obama's raw margin of victory over Romney passed the 3.5 million vote mark:

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

Alobama.

al-Obama surely

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:56 (twelve years ago)

yes but that sounds A-rab.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago)

Not sure if this has been posted:

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/karl-rove-gop-needs-to-copy-howard-deans

So count on maybe 27 or 28 on-air temper tantrums in 2016.

clemenza, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:02 (twelve years ago)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/Karl-Rove-zuma-wire.jpg

"...I farted."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:22 (twelve years ago)

Also I like him (and others) going on about the ground game. They do realize that a lot of their potential volunteers are going to be all "Hi, have you accepted Jesus...GAH, I mean the GOP?" at people, surely.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:23 (twelve years ago)

rove big upping dean is some weird ass futuristic shit

lag∞n, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:24 (twelve years ago)

rove was really positive in a zingy way to the dude who wrote that information diet book, who worked on that campaign iirc

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:26 (twelve years ago)

the 50 state strategy also involved running candidates that could win, which is a bigger issue for the GOP than ground game

iatee, Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

Karl Rove probably enjoys Guy Fieri cui-zeen.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 November 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

ok, this is not a prayer

http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/110067/what-was-romney-doing-in-coal-country

In letters to employees, Murray strongly urged them to give and warned of the severe consequences that the coal industry would suffer if Obama and other Democrats were not defeated. Last week, those warnings bore out. The day after the election, Murray Energy laid off 102 employees at its Utah mine and 54 at one of its southern Illinois mines. Murray read aloud a prayer to a group of employees to explain the decision:

Dear Lord: The American people have made their choice. They have decided that America must change its course, away from the principals of our Founders. And, away from the idea of individual freedom and individual responsibility. Away from capitalism, economic responsibility, and personal acceptance. We are a Country in favor of redistribution, national weakness and reduced standard of living and lower and lower levels of personal freedom. My regret, Lord, is that our young people, including those in my own family, never will know what America was like or might have been. They will pay the price in their reduced standard of living and, most especially, reduced freedom.

The takers outvoted the producers. In response to this, I have turned to my Bible and in II Peter, Chapter 1, verses 4-9 it says, ‘To faith we are to add goodness; to goodness, knowledge; to knowledge, self control; to self control, perseverance; to perseverance, godliness; to godliness, kindness; to brotherly kindness, love.’ Lord, please forgive me and anyone with me in Murray Energy Corp. for the decisions that we are now forced to make to preserve the very existence of any of the enterprises that you have helped us build. We ask for your guidance in this drastic time with the drastic decisions that will be made to have any hope of our survival as an American business enterprise. Amen.

j., Wednesday, 14 November 2012 00:57 (twelve years ago)

next time i act in an indefensible manner, i'm going to make sure to preface my remarks with "dear lord:"

Z S, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 01:03 (twelve years ago)

dear lord: why did you cause the rapid expansion of fracking and the subsequent glut of natural gas production and accompanying precipitous drop in natural gas prices, causing electric utilities to switch from coal to natural gas en masse? thanks,

Murph

Z S, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 01:06 (twelve years ago)

dear lord: it's murphdawg again, praying about the free market. i noticed that you didn't respond to my last prayer, just like all of my other prayers so i was really hoping that this time you might be able to provide an

Z S, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 01:07 (twelve years ago)

And, waiting on the horizon: SECESSION

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 03:49 (twelve years ago)

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/obamacare-repeal-low.png

interesting

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:14 (twelve years ago)

july 2012 looks like an outlier abnd the latest result is close enough to the long-term numbers that you wouldn't want to overread it

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:18 (twelve years ago)

but who knows, I'm sure there are some low info democrats who learned that they were supposed to like obamacare over the campaign

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:20 (twelve years ago)

seems like what youve got over the last few months is people moving from the repeal group to dont know/refuse, they may have just seceded tho

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:21 (twelve years ago)

yeah it's possible and probably even likely but w/ polls like this you gotta be skeptical...like the jump from june 2012 to july 2012 is about as huge as the jump since and there's no reason to believe a lot of people would have changed their mind about this during one month in the middle of summer

but as republicans begin to accept obamacare as inevitable and more people see the benefits, the numbers will def change

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:25 (twelve years ago)

i could def see the rhetoric of the campaign changing some minds, particularly since it was so ill explained the first time around, also the guy arguing against it was a total asshole who everyone hated

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:27 (twelve years ago)

and obvs you can give the recent movement more creedence than the midsummer blip as it represents a trend

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:29 (twelve years ago)

unless there werent any polls taken in sept/oct which is maybe what no numbers there mean in which case n/m

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:30 (twelve years ago)

I think that they didn't do a poll from aug to nov? that's why there's a huge gap. cause they repeat numbers in other places

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:30 (twelve years ago)

xp yeah

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:30 (twelve years ago)

guess they were too busy polling the election thanks a lot nate silver

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:32 (twelve years ago)

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2012/11/electoral-alchemy-what-was-mitt-romneys-magic-number.html

romney could have won if 142,262 people voted differently

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:33 (twelve years ago)

ha that's cool

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:36 (twelve years ago)

142,262 weird trick barack obama doesnt want you to know

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:37 (twelve years ago)

wiki on the popular vote compact:

As of April 2012, the compact has been joined by eight states and the District of Columbia (see map); their 132 combined electoral votes amount to 24.5% of the Electoral College and 49% of the 270 votes needed for the compact to go into effect.

Actually seems achievable within the next generation or so!

does smooshing cloacae together actually count as sodomy??? (silby), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:47 (twelve years ago)

we should put it off as long as the map looks better for the dems

obama coulda lost the popular vote by 2 points!

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:50 (twelve years ago)

Take a look at the screenshots in that New Yorker article of Romney's transition site. Hope it was filed away in the Internet Archive for posterity.

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:51 (twelve years ago)

it's interesting cause it gives a little insight into how he was planning on branding himself after a win

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:53 (twelve years ago)

'smaller, simpler, smarter' was def not his campaign theme

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:54 (twelve years ago)

cool map

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/545543_10151321923986667_860632622_n.jpg

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:56 (twelve years ago)

"The financial holdings and sources of income for most applicants under serious consideration must be disclosed for review..."--whoops, 'cept me!

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:57 (twelve years ago)

I love the fact that Romney was also going to use a cheesy President-Elect logo like Obama introduced.

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:58 (twelve years ago)

cool map

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/545543_10151321923986667_860632622_n.jpg

― lag∞n, Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:56 PM (2 minutes ago)

if you squint real hard you can see my green vote

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:05 (twelve years ago)

I can see all three of the green votes actually

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:09 (twelve years ago)

your protest has ben registered w/the proper authorities

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:10 (twelve years ago)

my green vote gives DC a nice subtle hint of blueish-blue-bluegreen that mixes in well with the dark blue

Z S, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:12 (twelve years ago)

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/romney-transition-site.jpg
https://safe.bankofamerica.com/pa/components/modules/olb-header-module/1.5/graphic/logo.gif

font very similar

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:44 (twelve years ago)

re: cool maps, don't know if we've seen this yet for this election - the ever-popular "states resized by population" version:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2012/statepop512.png

vs 2008 map for reference:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/statepopredblue512.png

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:52 (twelve years ago)

and the ever-popular county-level version, which I think probably tells the most coherent version of the tale. Sucks to be Alaska or Hawaii though.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2012/countycartrb512.png

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:54 (twelve years ago)

that looks like a tumor

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:55 (twelve years ago)

its not

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 05:57 (twelve years ago)

I wonder if there is a freeway route that you can take cross country and not hit a single blue county

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 06:01 (twelve years ago)

google maps should start that, politically oriented directions

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 06:01 (twelve years ago)

looks like a bird fucked up by an oil slick

sug ones (omar little), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 06:03 (twelve years ago)

you know these are all salient descriptions of america right

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 07:16 (twelve years ago)

Looks like one of those True Blood vampires exploded all over it.

Tim F, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 10:49 (twelve years ago)

so u guys have just moved Election Day thread here

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 12:21 (twelve years ago)

how terrible, people not respecting the sacred boundaries of politics threads

Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 14:03 (twelve years ago)

font very similar

This was one of my favorites of the campaign.

http://www.freewoodpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Romney_Suing_Aquafresh.png

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 14:49 (twelve years ago)

I've been slightly surprised (and relieved) there hasn't been more of this:

http://gawker.com/5960453/florida-man-angry-over-election-results-writes-fuck-obama-on-his-will-before-taking-his-own-life

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:22 (twelve years ago)

Not sure about seroquel, but it's really hard to kill yourself with xanax unless you have an existing heart condition

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

This is getting to be ridiculous. I don't remember any GHWB fans hanging themselves. No Dukakis people drank poison.

There were no Mondale voters, so that's a moot point anyway.

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:26 (twelve years ago)

GHWB was too dull to have fans. Dukakis' only fan was his mom.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:26 (twelve years ago)

Wait what about Olympia

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

Oscar ceremony shoutout

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgfzvaCXj1I

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

There were no Mondale voters

I bent over that one time.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

Not sure about seroquel, but it's really hard to kill yourself with xanax unless you have an existing heart condition

― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:25 AM (13 minutes ago)

not so tough when you add alcohol

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

this is not the place for my personal story, but sure

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

Meantime, a strangely silent Twitter

https://twitter.com/ggitcho

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2012/11/14/redistricting-does-not-explain-why-house-democrats-got-a-majority-of-the-vote-and-a-minority-of-the-seats/

If redistricting doesn’t explain the discrepancy, what does? We have argued that incumbency is a likely culprit, but as Dan Hopkins recently pointed out, Democrats also do worse because they are more concentrated in urban areas. They “waste” votes on huge margins there, when the party could put many of those votes to better use in marginal seats. (See this paper by Jowei Chen and Jonathan Rodden for more evidence on this point.)

It matters to get this right. If it’s redistricting, then Republicans rigged themselves control of a key lever of federal policymaking. This casts fundamental doubt on the legitimacy of the Republican majority, and bolsters calls for redistricting reform as a way to fix the problem (for the record, I’m not exactly an opponent of such reform). But if the explanation is incumbency or political geography, all it means is that our single-member district majoritarian system distorts outcomes in ways that are difficult to eradicate without moving to a different system entirely.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

Uh...might be just that coffee hasn't kicked in, but how are "political geography" and "wasted votes" separable from districting?

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

I mean, I am all for a proportional representation system, don't get me wrong!

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

yeah, I was gonna say the same thing. the whole point of redistricting is to concentrate the other party into limited areas so they "waste votes on huge margins" there.

wk, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

there's a limit to how much you can gerrymander - those districts in philly where there wasn't a single romney vote can't be extended to western philadelphia. whereas rural and suburban districts offer more flexibility because the district is going to be large regardless.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago)

thing abt this approach is it makes yr safe seats vulnerable too, obvs it worked really well this time around but theyve got four more cycles to go

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Sen. John McCain is calling for establishment of a Watergate-style congressional committee to investigate the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

not that it isnt a terrible fd up system in dire need of reform

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

"I'm still really upset about 2008," added the Senator.

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/Homepage/tap1/2012/11/weekOf121112/CA_121114_gopComeback.jpg

command f racism no results

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

Progressives like to think they’re the engine of history. They fight for change, and eventually conservatives succumb. But it doesn’t always work out that way. History is littered with liberal ideas—pacifism, high taxation, single parenting by choice—that conservatives challenged and defeated. Progressives may drive history, but conservatives filter it.

uh

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

see the conservatives were like, you don't want to be a single parent, and that's why they supported gay marriage, so that there are more marriage options, so all parents can be coupled

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

he literally could not think of a third thing

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

should be noted too that pacifism has made strong gains over the last 70 years

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

he misses the most obvious stuff. 'commmunism' etc.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

wow that's a lotta m's

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

free m's for everyone

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

the m's of production

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

there's no doubt that the gop will have to change radically or something else will take its place, but these columnists really overrate how quickly a 80 y/o evangelical tea partier can switch to supporting illegal immigrants getting gay married. I mean the fundamental problem isn't at the party level, it's at the voter level.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

yeah but shh Marco Rubio

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

that elephant up there is totally marching for illegal immigrant elephant gay marriage

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

what the puerto rico election result means: probably not much

http://themonkeycage.org/blog/2012/11/13/2012-puerto-rico-elections-post-election-report/

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:27 (twelve years ago)

LOL at single parent by choice... Like, "Hey, I want to have to have a full time job and be a the only person that looks after my children, that seems like a very attractive position!"... But, this is coming people who think that being gay is a "lifestyle choice" as well so... perhaps they honestly think "libruls jus b irrational like that!"

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:36 (twelve years ago)

coming *from people... jeez.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:36 (twelve years ago)

@pareene
I will remain unconvinced that any Bush tax cuts will ever expire until the day they actually do

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

@pareene I am a fan on tautologies except when I'm not

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

meant *of. I need to do some mavis beacon today.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago)

We have argued that incumbency is a likely culprit, but as Dan Hopkins recently pointed out, Democrats also do worse because they are more concentrated in urban areas. They “waste” votes on huge margins there, when the party could put many of those votes to better use in marginal seats.

does this guy not get what gerrymandering is?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

or do i?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

like I said, it's not that 'that's not gerrymandering', it's gerrymandering is inevitably constrained by urban geography and concentrated places are gonna be wasting votes even after a reasonably talented gerrymander

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago)

like if you think about NY state for example, there's no way to get those manhattan votes in a district upstate.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

still sort of think he was understating its impact

xp no but you could split up manhattan/nyc into several districts each of which would be proportional to an upstate district?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago)

yes, but those several districts are all going 80%, whereas in a gerrymandered red state it's easier to ensure that you don't 'waste' republican votes in districts goign 80%

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

Meantime, some inside baseball:

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2012-11-15/news/who-is-the-47-percent-videographer/

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:22 (twelve years ago)

sure - the fact that votes will always be 'wasted' like that (cf his graph) doesn't prove his point that gerrymandering isn't what is causing that discrepancy. he even implies that at least half of it is because of GOP gerrymandering xp

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

well it depends on how you define 'gerrymandering'. I mean clearly if more people voted dem and we have more gop reps then the composition and shape of the districts is ~the problem~. but he's saying that *new redistricting* doesn't fully explain this discrepancy and that when you have such a concentrated voting demographic, urban geography itself is a long-term problem for dems. the point of gerrymandering is to deconcentrate voters, and dems have an inherently concentrated voter base.

xp

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago)

so they were gerrymandered to begin with (from an ideal perspective) and were further gerrymandered recently. i can definitely buy the incumbency factor but that doesn't occur in a vacuum; those incumbents are in place because of the composition of the districts in the first place

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

like if you think about NY state for example, there's no way to get those manhattan votes in a district upstate.

But you could, couldn't you, if you really tried?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/NC/12

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:41 (twelve years ago)

agh that makes me want to throttle someone

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

that's usually the case, but 2010 was a wave election that put a lot of people beyond the long-term ideological composition of the district in office and now a lot of those people have the $ / other benefits of being incumbents.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago)

xp

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago)

But you could, couldn't you, if you really tried?

even if you draw a line 100 feet wide starting in manhattan and go north, you're gonna cover a lot of people. basically as absurd as that nc gerrymander is, ny state would be even more ridiculous. I'd like to see someone figure it out w/ a computer tho.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

yeah i mean we basically agree. i think the dude set out with the hypothesis that gerrymandering ~isn't really the problem~ but really it (or just the "way districts are drawn in general") ~is really the problem~. urban concentration is an issue because no one irl is gonna fix the districts to how we want them to be/how they should be

xp

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:49 (twelve years ago)

well he said *redistricting* wasn't the problem, ie 'the change in gerrymandering'

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

I think the confusion stems from gerrymandering being both a verb and a noun

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

not news to anyone itt probably but the wiki article on this is huge and fascinating

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

The biggest piece of trivia I can offer that no one cares about is that the word gerrymander should be pronounced with a hard 'g'.

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

you gotta be a hard g to gerrymander

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

thought you were making a "gif" joek, but i'll be damned

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbridge_Gerry

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

i was just listening to the obama press conference in the car and he emphasized over and over that he would not agree to a deal that did not raise taxes on the wealthy.

Mordy, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:14 (twelve years ago)

presently under way http://deadspin.com/5960364/skew-yourselves-nate-silver-is-here-to-answer-your-questions

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

let's keep that to the Cabrera/Trout race

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:22 (twelve years ago)

yeah he seemed pretty adamant that he meant raise in top rates specifically, not dynamic revenue tricks or whatever, said closing loopholes on the table but would be in addition to raising top rates. pointed out ppl getting taxes raised on income over 250k would still be getting taxes cut on income up to 250k, i think this president might finally be grasping the american ppl are idiots and need to be told this. also said immigration reform, path to citizenship one of the first things on agenda.

balls, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:23 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/KpDzD.png

come at me bro

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

Nate from lag∞n's link re Dem backlash in 2010: But I don't want to make it sound as though the two sides are equal. It seems as though a higher percentage of conservatives are more inclined to question empirical methods, to put it diplomatically.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:32 (twelve years ago)

From high school friend's fb page: "Thank you #mrpresident for standing up for #condoleezarice! I totally agree with you on that!"

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:33 (twelve years ago)

these hypothetical districts based on an algorithm are pretty cool

http://www.rangevoting.org/SplitLR.html

crazy tho

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

http://www.rangevoting.org/Splitline2009/co.png

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

http://cdn.wikimg.net/strategywiki/images/8/86/Qix_StrategyD.png

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

http://www.rangevoting.org/Splitline2009/ny.png

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

these r v pretty

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

ha, colorado is the one special (bad) case for his math, apparently

goole, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

ya thats why i clicked on it

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

So lonely

http://www.rangevoting.org/Splitline2009/wy.png

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

http://www.rangevoting.org/Splitline2009/dc.png

mookieproof, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

aw

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

that rangevoting this is pretty cool

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

Compared with the official US districtings as of 2007, our algorithm appears to generate as good or better – often a lot better – districtings about 98% of the time. The only state we know of where the official districting seems arguably better than the splitline algorithm's, is Colorado. And even there, ours is arguably better too. (The official districting is "better" in the sense it follows county lines more and subjectively "looks good to the eye." However it remains "worse" in the objective sense that it has at least 50% longer "cut length" of all the inter-district boundaries. Also, the key official high-population-density district 7, while it may look ok in the low-res map we gave, looks substantially more gerrymandered shown in yellow at hi-res.) Why?

'better' at what? population distribution? on a national level the above maps would prob still have a republican bias for the same rural vs. urban reasons mentioned upthread. like, straight lines are only neutral if when the geography itself is neutral.

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

if or when

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

better as in looks like a modernist stained glass window

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

So...wait. Those models apportion the same number of voters to each section and then divvy them up using the shortest/most direct lines that maintain the numerical balance, is that...close enough?

grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

yeah

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

I am more interested in peak gerrymander. how many seats could the dems/gop theoretically have w/ unlimited gerrymander power?

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:21 (twelve years ago)

this is an excellent question

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:23 (twelve years ago)

id also like to read more on multiple rep districts, particularly if there are sweet maps, seems like the best plan

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

one thread I always wanted to start was 'draw fantasy political lines on a map so things make more sense'

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:28 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/Dczjk.jpg

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

iatee do you mean merely if voting rights act was overturned or something like if dems/gop controlled all 50 state legislatures?

balls, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

LOL at single parent by choice... Like, "Hey, I want to have to have a full time job and be a the only person that looks after my children, that seems like a very attractive position!"

There's at least one ILX thread with this as a basis, just sayin'

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

Here's one up iatee's alley: what would the U.S. look like with 435 congressional districts equally distributed in population without any regard to state lines?

pplains, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

I mean if the dems/gop controlled all 50 states and could also have literally any map they wanted, even if parts of districts were 5 feet wide. xp

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

it's probably NP-complete

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago)

reasoning is a bit esoteric, in that I don't think that somebody who is observing or predicting behavior should also be participating in the "experiment".

Put another way, I think someone should choose whether he is an activist (someone trying to influence the outcome) or an analyst (someone trying to understand it at arm's-length) and I chose the latter path.

But it's not that I don't have political views. I'm somewhere between a liberal and a libertarian, so my vote choice would have been dictated accordingly.

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

Here's one up iatee's alley: what would the U.S. look like with 435 congressional districts equally distributed in population without any regard to state lines?

if you used some straight lines modeling like the above map there would still be something of a rural bias, but small pop states are also losing their one simple trick to get a congressperson so that might cancel it out

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:49 (twelve years ago)

Nate_Silver_538 @Agent Shmalan 7 minutes ago Share7 minutes ago In the book, I talk to Bob Voulgaris, who is maybe the best sports bettor in the world. Super sharp. Works his butt off. He gets 57% of his NBA bets right, not more than that. The luck component is pretty large. I think we add value mostly by comparison because the pundits are the equivalent of the 1899 Cleveland Spiders.

attn ILH

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:50 (twelve years ago)

uh oh looks like i need to read that shit

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago)

haha same thought

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago)

i was sorta considering it but this def puts it into strong lean territory

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

my friend said its like 500 pages so it's a pretty good deal for the money

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:54 (twelve years ago)

it's good - i haven't read it straight through but i skipped around to the chapters that interested me and there was some good stuff in there. not as well written as the NYT blog imho.

Mordy, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:54 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, it's okay. Like, readable and interesting, but in no way earthshaking. Which is kind of the point. In a world of Gladwells, Silver's intellectual modesty and contempt for pundits is its own strongest argument.

sug life (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

fuck Gladwell

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:37 (twelve years ago)

^^^^

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:40 (twelve years ago)

I saw Silver speak a week ago -- ran through what I assumed were some of the key examples/case studies in his book, then took questions. He was less awkward than he is on TV, though still kind of anxious (he has a verbal tic where he says "right?" a lot) -- but also pretty sharp and quick on his feet during the Q&A.

Sandy Denny Real Estate (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:49 (twelve years ago)

did you ask him about chicago burritos?

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:51 (twelve years ago)

did you ask him why he's gay?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:52 (twelve years ago)

Did you ask him if he wanted to unskew Dean Chambers' poll wait that came out wrong

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:54 (twelve years ago)

You should have asked him if he believes in eyebrow waxery.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 21:56 (twelve years ago)

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/obama-taxes-two-percent-loopholes.php?ref=fpa

If I were the Republicans, I'd come back with an idea to have a bake sale. Not just any bake sale, though--a super colossal bake sale, with super colossal profit margins on every item.

clemenza, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

You really don't understand baseball-nerd homos, do you Alfred?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:17 (twelve years ago)

You really don't understand baseball-nerd homos, do you Alfred?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:17 (twelve years ago)

Obama bought off minorities, apparently: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/romney-blames-loss-on-obamas-gifts-to-minorities-and-young-voters/

Gukbe, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:19 (twelve years ago)

PEOPLE WHO WANT STUFF

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

aka people

lag∞n, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:21 (twelve years ago)

minorities haven't gotten shit from O, so par for He Who Must Be Forgotten

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:25 (twelve years ago)

okay that didn't completely work just go 2 site

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

did you ask him about chicago burritos?

Nah -- it was in a crowded auditorium, and all sorts of star-struck middle-aged liberals were stumbling over their seats for the opportunity to ask him about the Cubs.

Sandy Denny Real Estate (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

haha wtf, it's almost like doing things that help certain people might make them want to vote for you. romney team blindsided again!

all mods con (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:31 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, from the Twilight Zone:

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/georgia-senate-gets-52-minute-briefing-united-nations-takeover

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago)

i just finished his book, it has some cool stuff in it but i wish he would emphasize his main points a little better

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago)

http://www.motherjones.com/files/images/screen_shot_2012-11-14_at_8.02.21_am.png

dying

iatee, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

GOP types blather about what to fix:

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/11/13/what-next-for-the-republican-party

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

TBD

balls, Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:39 (twelve years ago)

Stay Firm on Fiscal Responsibility

Matt Kibbe, FreedomWorks

Fortunately for the G.O.P., the class of the 2010 Tea Party revolution will be ready for prime time in 2016.

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago)

^^^one of these Repubs is not like the other

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago)

Ooooooh, now I get why, intellectually, I sensed these people were in seventh grade when they arrived in Congress.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:43 (twelve years ago)

Haha, I was wondering what exactly someone would need to do to be forced out of the Georgia Tea Party.

http://www.indefenseofliberty.tv/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GTPI-Resolution-Field-Searcy.pdf

By the end of my second term, Gingrich said... (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

“With regards to the young people, for instance, a forgiveness of college loan interest, was a big gift,” Romney said. “Free contraceptives were very big with young college-aged women. And then, finally, Obamacare also made a difference for them, because as you know, anybody now 26 years of age and younger was now going to be part of their parents’ plan, and that was a big gift to young people. They turned out in large numbers, a larger share in this election even than in 2008.”

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:16 (twelve years ago)

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/14/romney-blames-loss-on-obamas-gifts-to-minorities-and-young-voters/

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:16 (twelve years ago)

“You can imagine for somebody making $25,000 or $30,000 or $35,000 a year, being told you’re now going to get free health care, particularly if you don’t have it, getting free health care worth, what, $10,000 per family, in perpetuity, I mean, this is huge,” he said. “Likewise with Hispanic voters, free health care was a big plus. But in addition with regards to Hispanic voters, the amnesty for children of illegals, the so-called Dream Act kids, was a huge plus for that voting group.”

what an ironclad dick

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:18 (twelve years ago)

lol this guy is so far up his own butthole

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:19 (twelve years ago)

first he thought he was gonna win because of fake polls he made up himself, now hes blaming his loss on free stuff

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:19 (twelve years ago)

i have only one thing to say: haha you lost, loser

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:20 (twelve years ago)

man if only Obama hadn't done things that people liked, we totally would have had him

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:20 (twelve years ago)

also: can i have a million dollars

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:20 (twelve years ago)

if it hadn't been for that health care law that is my greatest legislative achievement I would have totally beaten Obama

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:21 (twelve years ago)

there is something genuinely kinda sad about the whole 'they actually thought they were gonna win', like the world played a cruel trick on them

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 00:24 (twelve years ago)

Thought Obama's defense of Susan Rice today was pretty great (there's a photo earlier in the thread, here's the clip): "They should go after me."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXb-ksixaDA

Hope that gave McCain heartburn.

clemenza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:08 (twelve years ago)

Otm

O just was staring DAGGERS

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:31 (twelve years ago)

OBAMA CLAUS

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:31 (twelve years ago)

Pelosi should've said "binders full of votes" IMHO

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:39 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, from the Twilight Zone:

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/georgia-senate-gets-52-minute-briefing-united-nations-takeover

― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The presentation also featured a special video cameo from conservative talking-head Dick Morris in which the former Clinton aide warns that Obama "wants to force everyone into the cities from whence our ancestors fled."

^^^ this obamafear -- obama is going to force the whites back into the cities -- comes up from time to time on NRO (whites are of course referred to as "suburbanites") and always totally blows my mind, like way more than the birth certificate or kenya or HE ATE A DOG stuff, just because those are so pedestrian and this is such a genuine triumph of the racist imagination.

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:40 (twelve years ago)

Does Romney understand that the health care bill he signed in Massachusetts does not actually give "free" health care to anyone? THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE!

But I guess there's no reason to expect him to be a gracious loser. He's not used to being either one.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:44 (twelve years ago)

On a related note, when I posted a TNC bit about Ryan complaining about "the urban vote" on FB, a comment I got from the guy I've mentioned previously was

"Offer free 40 ouncers for their votes...worked like a charm this time..."

and who, when told that that was seriously not coll, responded:

"You mean they willingly voted for a guy that has the unemployment rate at a shocking 15% in their community? I stand corrected. Thanks for setting me straight on that one."

So there you go.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:49 (twelve years ago)

Cool, rather.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:50 (twelve years ago)

Wow.

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:52 (twelve years ago)

it's important to remember that he's talking to billionaires who want to hear exactly what he's saying, I don't give the guy *that* much credit but he prob is aware of some of these things

xps

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:52 (twelve years ago)

but who knows maybe he's entered the same event horizon that McCain fell into

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:53 (twelve years ago)

(this was true w/ the 47% comment too)

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:54 (twelve years ago)

I mean put yourself in his magic underwear - what do you say to these guys? 'we sucked at campaigning, sorry for wasting a billion dollars.'? 'its important to remember that Nate silver said the fundamentals were against us'? or 'black guy gave too much free stuff to poor people'

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:00 (twelve years ago)

why would he even bother making a public appearance, or even a statement tho

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:02 (twelve years ago)

he's not going to be president ever so he might as well just sit in one of his homes and turn money into more money

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:02 (twelve years ago)

Campaign debt, yo

That's what this shit's about

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:05 (twelve years ago)

it wasn't a public statement it was to rich and powerful people and it can't hurt to keep connections. he also mentioned wanting to help influence the 2016 election.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:07 (twelve years ago)

Romney can pay the campaign debt of losers going back to Sam Tilden.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:12 (twelve years ago)

I thought getting "people" "stuff" is exactly what politics is..?

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:42 (twelve years ago)

In a news conference of his own Wednesday, Mr. Obama, asked if he still planned to meet with Mr. Romney for a postelection discussion, spoke positively of his former opponent, saying that he “did a terrific job of running the Olympics,” and that he appreciated Mr. Romney’s ideas on government efficiency.

slept on

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:08 (twelve years ago)

next level zings from our president

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

"Mr. Romney will be remembered in our great nation's annals as a fabulous tannist"

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:11 (twelve years ago)

http://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/the-possible-barack-mitt-show

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:12 (twelve years ago)

http://www.dolekemp96.org/main.htm

real apparently

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:14 (twelve years ago)

Nice steamy coffee.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:15 (twelve years ago)

Shoulda voted for him. My family is way too dangerous.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:17 (twelve years ago)

http://www.dolekemp96.org/interactive/interactive.html

It's impossible for me to read these and not hear them said in Bob Dole's voice.

"Don't just copy a button - make your own!"

pplains, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

http://www.dolekemp96.org/interactive/computer/leader.bmp

pplains, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:21 (twelve years ago)

TAKE A BREAK TO PLAY A GAME. BOB DOLE SAYS IT'S OKAY.

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:22 (twelve years ago)

I thought getting "people" "stuff" is exactly what politics is..?

And obv Romney promised people stuff too, it's just that he promised too much stuff to too few people. There's all the talk about the demographic problem for Republicans, but not enough talk about how if you structure big chunks of your platform (estate tax, capital gains tax) around things that only benefit 1 or 2 out of every 100 people, it is eventually going to catch up with you in anything approaching a democratic system.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:30 (twelve years ago)

http://www.4president.us/1996websites.htm

Ahhhh good old 1990s web design. "Netscape users enter here. Other users enter here."

Mr. Snrub, Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:35 (twelve years ago)

chait is very optimistic i think: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/obamas-strategy-to-win-the-budget-fight.html

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:16 (twelve years ago)

http://www.dolekemp96.org/about/cookies/cookies.html

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:17 (twelve years ago)

hahaha i was so hoping that would be an FAQ page re: "When I visit your website, my computer asks me something about enabling cookies? Where can I get these cookies?"

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:19 (twelve years ago)

http://www.4president.us/websites/1996/1996screenshots/clintongore1996issues.jpg

ironic drudge foreshadowing

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:26 (twelve years ago)

More opportunities. Smaller government. Pecan Roll Cookies.

It's funny to me that not even ten years later, that shit simply would not fly on a candidate's website anymore. game done changed

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:27 (twelve years ago)

he got 1996 issues and a bish is one

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:27 (twelve years ago)

Obama added, "He presented some ideas in the course of the campaign that I actually agree with."

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:27 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/b0u0E.png

jindal presenting himself as the guy who gets it, you dont say those things, no need to change yr policies at all, just dont say those things

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:31 (twelve years ago)

if there's one thing jindal learned in '09, it was the downside of saying things

da croupier, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:35 (twelve years ago)

man is jindal still really gonna attempt a run

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:36 (twelve years ago)

looks like it

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:39 (twelve years ago)

im pretty psyched for the next round of republican primary debates i must admit

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:40 (twelve years ago)

2016 republican primary anticipation thread

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:41 (twelve years ago)

haha

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:44 (twelve years ago)

thanks for making that thread

chief beef (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:44 (twelve years ago)

it was inevitable

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:46 (twelve years ago)

2016 will be great but I do wonder if we will ever see a primary as amazing as the gop 2012 again.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:51 (twelve years ago)

man I just remembered when Romney got super tan for that Univision interview

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:52 (twelve years ago)

im still disappointed palin bailed, when i think of what couldve been

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:55 (twelve years ago)

maybe something to look forward to in 2016

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 04:56 (twelve years ago)

The Republican nomination this year was the funniest I've ever followed (until Romney locked it up, anyway), but nothing matches the drama of the Democrats in 2008.

clemenza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 12:32 (twelve years ago)

im pretty psyched for the next round of republican primary debates i must admit

Guessing four or five instead of 20--I keep hearing people on TV talk about how deadly that was. (Which speaks to the people who were up there, but it was Romney who had to live with all that was said in the end, including all the stuff where he boxed himself in.)

clemenza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 12:40 (twelve years ago)

I dunno, I didn't have as much invested in it (because I would be happy with both 2008 choices), but it's still dramatic to see each of the GOP nominees briefly ascend to front place, only to catch a flaming branch to the face. It's just not as dramatic as it is funny, is all.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 15 November 2012 12:45 (twelve years ago)

2016 will be great but I do wonder if we will ever see a primary as amazing as the gop 2012 again.

I doubt it. Perfect fucking storm imo. Unless Hillary runs, which I don't think she will. If she did you'd get the absolute ultimate best GOP primary field ever.

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:04 (twelve years ago)

it seemed so certain a while back that Hillary was gonna run but now she's barely in the convo anymore, did something happened that i missed?

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:15 (twelve years ago)

She's gettin' old?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:20 (twelve years ago)

Biden too (among other problems)

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:21 (twelve years ago)

yeah i'm aware of her age, never thought that was as much of an issue for a female candidate, though, given life expectancy differences between genders

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:22 (twelve years ago)

It's the miles, not the years.

Jeff, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:25 (twelve years ago)

You get a lot of miles as Secretary of State, though.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:32 (twelve years ago)

if the economy looks good Hillary will pretty much walk into the nomination and the white house

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:37 (twelve years ago)

yeah i'm aware of her age, never thought that was as much of an issue for a female candidate, though, given life expectancy differences between genders

I got a trunkful of feminist theory here that'll tell you "old woman" is a social status that puts you at a disadvantage for being taken seriously

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago)

'republican party presidential candidate' is also a status that puts you at a disadvantage for being taken seriously

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:43 (twelve years ago)

If Hillary ran she would be the same age as Reagan, who was the oldest president.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:44 (twelve years ago)

xxp to aero Why, just yesterday, Mr. Nepotism 2010 Luke Russert asked Nancy Pelosi if maybe she wasn't getting up there in years and should maybe step aside for some younger leaders.

super perv powder (Phil D.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:51 (twelve years ago)

I got a trunkful of feminist theory here that'll tell you "old woman" is a social status that puts you at a disadvantage for being taken seriously

― too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:40 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i get what you're saying in one sense but it seems odd in this context, discussing someone who's already taken seriously by a lot of people (and not taken seriously by a lot of people who'd never change their mind anyway) -- why would anyone "take seriously" 61-year-old Hillary in 2008 but not 69-year-old Hillary in 2016. somewhere in between is where she crosses the line and everyone gets the instinct to yell "go bake some cookies, grandma!"?

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:53 (twelve years ago)

anyway my point was ever since O won in '08 there's been talk of her running in 2016, and the age she'd be at that point has not changed, so i was wondering if there was any OTHER reason her candidacy seemed less of a given now than a year or two back

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:56 (twelve years ago)

i think it's such a given that she'd win the nom (and presidency) if she wanted it that it's boring to discuss until she gives a better indication that she's going to do it.

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:00 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:08 (twelve years ago)

I don't think the presidency is a given. The shit could hit the fan in the next 4 years and ppl decide that there is no way they will elect another dem into office.

Jeff, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:17 (twelve years ago)

yeah i agree mordy. i just brought it up because aero seemed really certain she won't run and i was curious why.

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:22 (twelve years ago)

She's hasn't ruled out running, so figure she's going to rest for a couple years before deciding.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:26 (twelve years ago)

The thought of Christie, Jindal and Rubio trading barbs just warmed my heart.

Throw in a tanned, relaxed and ready Rick Perry, and 2016 will be a lot of fun.

pplains, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:29 (twelve years ago)

Why, just yesterday, Mr. Nepotism 2010 Luke Russert asked Nancy Pelosi if maybe she wasn't getting up there in years and should maybe step aside for some younger leaders.

And she didn't punch him in the face?

this will surprise many (Nicole), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:31 (twelve years ago)

She seemed like she wanted to.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:38 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, she was livid.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:41 (twelve years ago)

I think there is a difference between being 'too old' as in 'wow that is a large number on your wikipedia page' and 'too old' in a 'wow is that person really capable of handling those duties and/or feeding themselves'.

I think strategic ageism is probably harder than you'd imagine because old people vote a lot and they are easily offended.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:46 (twelve years ago)

Plus Pelosi's younger than 4/9 of the Supreme Court. And I don't know how many senators.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:53 (twelve years ago)

plus luke russert is a little shit

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:54 (twelve years ago)

anyone named "Luke" tends to be

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:55 (twelve years ago)

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/files/original/Election-2008--Luke-Russert--Virginia-Sherwood-743848.jpg

Serious Luke is Serious.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:56 (twelve years ago)

fwiw imho ~70 is too old to be running for a first term as president, i mean 78 by the end of yr second term, you slow down a lot by the time yr 78

agree w/everyone who says its prob hers for the taking if she wants it tho

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:03 (twelve years ago)

Are there any other women in the Dem ranks who might make a run?

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:04 (twelve years ago)

I don't think Elizabeth Warren is even thinking about it, and I hope no one tries to persuade her.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:05 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyqrwYvdbeY

super perv powder (Phil D.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

Since the 1996 CyberHighway sites were posted, I casually remembered what a big deal Dole's age was, how he could die at any given moment he was so old.

And here we are four presidential terms later and the guy is still breathing.

pplains, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

warren is only a couple years younger than hillary fwiw

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

shes too liberal tho, imho kinda a non starter

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

And here we are four presidential terms later and the guy is still breathing.

Him and Castro, partying down somewhere. You know it.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

warren looks really good for her age

but the bigger nonstarter is that she doesn't have the political CV

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:26 (twelve years ago)

People keep saying Obama slips into professorial behavior, but Elizabeth Warren wakes up and goes to sleep each night having been that way all day long. I think she'll probably be great as a senator but would be dead in the water as a national candidate.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago)

it's gabbneb's world

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago)

warren looks really good for her age

but the bigger nonstarter is that she doesn't have the political CV

― iatee, Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:26 AM (4 minutes ago)

this is a bad thing these days?

chief beef (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:31 (twelve years ago)

if only it were possible for a one term senator to be elected president

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:31 (twelve years ago)

you are not gonna win ohio et al. on 'I am a very smart college professor...have you heard of harvard'

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:32 (twelve years ago)

iatee let me introduce you to a man named Barack Hussein Obama

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:33 (twelve years ago)

he just won ohio

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:33 (twelve years ago)

obama was a politician for longer than that tho xp

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:33 (twelve years ago)

thanks I have been waiting for a formal introduction forever, I forgot that everyone in ohio got to hang out with him by now

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

Campaign trail Obama is way different than Oval Office Obama, though.

FIRED UP! READY TO GO! vs. "uh...blahbity blah...um...uh...blah"

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:35 (twelve years ago)

he seemed pretty fired up yesterday

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

for sure ready to go

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

xp true. I'd love to see more that.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

“I think the American people right now have been so focused and will continue to be focused on our economy, jobs and growth that if the message is somehow that we’re going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, I don’t think anybody’s going to go for that. I won’t go for that."

Kind of sounds like a fucking idiot.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

looking obamas remarks re what he regrets from his first term 'not explaining things good enough' i think theres a good change for better or for worse well see him more in campaign mode this term

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago)

He continued: “If, on the other hand, we can shape an agenda that says we can create jobs, advance growth and make a serious dent in climate change and be an international leader, I think that’s something that the American people will support.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83865.html#ixzz2CJ3YAtGm

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

Setting up a presumption that solutions to climate change are somehow an opposing force to economic growth has, in the case of many other politicians, been the first step down the road to avoiding doing much about the issue at all.... and, REPRISE!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/obama-climate-change_b_2133487.html

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

“I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions,” Obama said during his first news conference since being reelected. “As a consequence, I think we’ve got an obligation to future generations to do something about it.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83865.html#ixzz2CJ3nHm8G

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

itd more accurate to characterize his comments a response to criticism than setting anything up

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

my opponents say i want to destroy the economy but thats not true i want a healthy economy and a healthy environment etc etc

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

having a strong economy is a prerequisite to passing strong climate change legislation. the dems aren't going to get #2 without #1.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

i think environmental regulations + implementation of alternative energy is not just compatible with a good economy but possibly the source of an economic boom. regulations create jobs, and obama is gearing up to make that case i'm very much in favor of it.

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

and if* obama is

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

that's kinda magical thinking tbh cause economic growth is almost inevitably bad for the environment on some level but still

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

regulations create jobs

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

any sufficiently advanced economic growth is indistinguishable from magic

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

having a strong economy is a prerequisite to passing strong climate change legislation. the dems aren't going to get #2 without #1.

and then when you have a "strong economy" (which will also result in the price of gasoline blowing past record highs), it won't be the time to do climate change legislation, because they'll say, "why would you want to damage the strong economy?"

the underlying problem is the false economy vs environment dichotomy, which is made even more ridiculous because it's totally false. only a buffoon would think that the clean energy industry isn't going to be a huge player for the foreseeable future.

Z S, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

http://www.epi.org/publication/wp292-regulation-output-gaps/

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/16/clinton-running-for-president/

Blitzer sat down with the former 2008 presidential candidate in Cairo.

Full transcript:

Click to watch video

Q- If the president is reelected, do you want to serve a second term as secretary of state?

No

Q- Would you like to serve as secretary of defense?

No

Q- Would you like to be vice president of the United States?

No

Q- Would you like to be president of the United States?

No

― goole, Wednesday, 16 March 2011 21:38 (1 year ago) Permalink

pimp shit

― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 16 March 2011 22:15 (1 year ago) Permalink

goole, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

haha

chief beef (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

the Republicrat paymasters simply aren't going to permit an overhauled green economy, full stop.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

good point

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

well reasoned

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

incisive

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

Mr. Que liked this

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

regulations create jobs

'regulations' is such a broad term that people prob shouldn't even use it in sentences like this. sometimes they do, sometimes they don't!

the underlying problem is the false economy vs environment dichotomy, which is made even more ridiculous because it's totally false. only a buffoon would think that the clean energy industry isn't going to be a huge player for the foreseeable future.

welll in the long-term economic growth is basically just bad, even if it's 'people w/ ~green jobs~ spending their money'

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

Y'know, Morbs, I think a lot of people agree with many of the sentiments you actually express, but your tone is similar to that guy on the streetcorner talking about conspiracies and the green sheep that eat his oatmeal.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

green sheep notm, get your own oatmeal

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:04 (twelve years ago)

hah

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

I am on serious drugs and slept about 2 hours last night.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

Great sheep create jobs.

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

Green ones too.

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

The sentiments that Morbz expresses are just nihilistic pessimism. There is nothing more to them than negative affect.

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

I generally don't believe in "conspiracies" -- fucking people up the ass with a chainsaw quite openly is the m.o. of our owners.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

loling at the idea of a raving mad man notm-ing imaginary sheep

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

That Clinton interview is great. She's got my vote for all those positions she doesn't want.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

Oh, wait, that was 610 days ago.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

fucking people up the ass with a chainsaw quite openly is the m.o. of our owners

So underreported even http://www.projectcensored.org/the-top-25-index/ isn't tracking it!

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

Pretty sure it's impossible to fuck people up the ass or otherwise with a chainsaw. Let me google that ...

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:16 (twelve years ago)

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQiPtMQA1bm1NdNHdkcu2PYT9HAzNnv6QmNjVz-foa2kjotS03-KA

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

do raving mad men dream of notm sheep?

pplains, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

Even if Warren ever wanted to run for president, she'd be doomed from the start. Wall Street actually supported Obama the first time around, but for her they'd go straight to nukes. (But she also seems to me like somebody who will be happy in the Senate, from a process standpoint. Senate's a good place for eggheads.)

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

yeah i mean some politicians are just not on the POTUS track and never will be, and sometimes that's for the best.

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:51 (twelve years ago)

warren does i think deserve to be included in the list of legit prospective presidential contenders if you look at what she accomplished in her v first political campaign ever, she beat a popular incumbent, she became a national celebrity, and she raised more money than anyone ever for a statewide race in massachusetts, all these point to the fact that she is a for real vote getter, which is m/l the quality youre looking for

the thing playing against her is imho like i said upthread her politics are too liberal, but who knows this populist anti fat cats pro big government sentiment looks p radical in washington but seems to be quite popular amongst regular folks, i could def see it being lot more the political mainstream in four years

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

long story short i think shes a legit darkhorse possibility

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:25 (twelve years ago)

as for the worries expressed above re her being a professorial egghead, i watched a couple of the debates and she is fiery, brown kept calling her professor but it didnt really land, def way less of an academic affect than obama

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago)

Because she'd get no backing from Wall Street or super PACs a Warren candidacy would be a triumph of local activism...but I ain't holding my breath.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:32 (twelve years ago)

we just need to get spielberg to tell her to stop moving her head so much when she speaks

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

theres plenty of other places to get money, you think wall street was giving obama love this cycle

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

and fwiw both obamas campaigns could be considered triumphs of local activism, got way more small donations than any one ever, massively out raised on the super pac side this cycle

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago)

as long as President Warren doesn't hire Robert Rubin for Treasury

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

well tbh she was a democrat who won office in massachusetts and a lot of money flowed to her cause she was the stylish donation for a lefty this year. that doesnt necessarily mean she'd be able to do the big money fundraising or organize a more sophisticated campaign. or pander to Iowans etc. I think she'd have to spend the next few years very wisely.

but I guess I'm willing to buy her as a possible dark horse. if hrc doesn't run that gives her the 'female president' momentum too.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:39 (twelve years ago)

it would start out pretty Howard Dean 2004 for sure

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:40 (twelve years ago)

her version of the dean scream will be a long boring PowerPoint lecture

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago)

WRT Warren, Massachusetts hasn't had a particularly good run at president for a half-century. Ted K., Dukakis, Kerry, Romney...

If its not Clinton redux, I hope some swing state Dem Senator rises to greater prominence over the next 4 years: Bennet, Udall, Harkin, Nelson, Levin, Stabinow, Brown, Warner, Webb etc. Jim Webb definitely has a good biography (for a national race) working for him, but sadly he's quitting politics in '12...

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:44 (twelve years ago)

her version of the dean scream will be a long boring PowerPoint lecture

― iatee, Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:43 PM (55 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is srsly not her style everyone!

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:45 (twelve years ago)

http://mjcdn.motherjones.com/preset_16/elizabeth_warren-425x320.jpg

"We're going to win Lowell...and Brockton...and Pittsfield...and..."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:45 (twelve years ago)

jim webb might as well be a republican, no thank you

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:45 (twelve years ago)

"did everyone receive the handout?"

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

http://mjcdn.motherjones.com/preset_16/elizabeth_warren-425x320.jpg
i will crush the credit card cartel with my iron fist

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:48 (twelve years ago)

you think wall street was giving obama love this cycle

he got quite a lot actually, just not the full-throttle '08 level cuz he couldn't manage to rim and blow them at the same time as they wanted.

http://www.ibtimes.com/wall-street-keeps-giving-obama-despite-public-spats-report-721197

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57465854-503544/wall-street-still-giving-to-obama/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

she beat a popular incumbent

Scott Brown was "popular" in the sense that he didn't go to Washington and start actively campaigning to have gays shot on sight and women locked into birthing chairs. People thought he was surprisingly nice and relatively even-handed for a Republican but no one here actually forgot his "I wish I'd been the vote that defeated Obamacare" commentary during the special election and he was a dude the spent a lot of time voting for legislation that pandered to large corporations running against someone whose life work for the past decade or so has been informing people about the myriad ways in which large corporations shape the political process in order to better screw over the average citizen. Literally the only way she was going to lose would have been if she had never given an interview or spoken to anyone about her platform.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

webb went to bat for criminal justice reform so he has my respect

i have not read his book on how awesome the crazy scots-irish are but i've flipped through it

goole, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago)

jim webb looked good during the dubya years when the received wisdom was 'dems will never succeed unless everyone becomes jim webb'. now that we've fully entered the everyone vs white guys era of american politics I'm not sure he'd be a stronger candidate than say, elizabeth warren

xps

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

and Colin Firth will play Jim Webb in the next Bush-era movie.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

Literally the only way she was going to lose would have been if she had never given an interview or spoken to anyone about her platform.

― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:53 PM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

scott brown was popular in that he polled as popular in massachusetts and was ahead for most of the campaign, the consensus amongst the mass political class was that he was a shoe in for reelection which is why you didnt see any congresspeople running against him, there are literally many many ways in which she couldve lost

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:58 (twelve years ago)

warren ran a v good campaign

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

she did but she also ran a very good MA campaign which is not the same as a good iowa campaign

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

a point which could be made abt any candidate who hasnt been elected president

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

like howard dean

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

or anyone

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

obama ran a good illinois campaign which is not the same as a good north carolina campaign

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

this is why we have primaries

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

ya but all that mattered was his iowa campaign!

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

fine, obama ran a good illinois campaign which is not the same as a good iowa campaign

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago)

if he had not run a great iowa campaign, hrc would be president, straight up

people complain too much about the electoral college and not enough about iowa and nh

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago)

lag∞n, how did you miss Obama shutting down lower Manhattan every 2 weeks last spring when he went to a Wall Street fatcat fundraiser, btw?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:07 (twelve years ago)

iirc that's only true for Dems. Iowa's GOP winner is usually sure to lose the nomination.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

newsflash some wall st dudes are democrats and even progressive warren were she to run for president would get some money from wall street too

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

and I mean do you really think there is any margin for her to work in if hrc is running? like I can see it maybe if it's just cuomo and some rando dudes but otherwise this seems like a nonstarter for that reason alone.

xp

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

if hillary runs no one has any margin

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago)

right. so if she doesn't yeah maybe I can see it, but she's killed too many people at this point to not run.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago)

I honestly could see this Hillary thing going either way. I wouldn't be surprised if she runs and I'd find it completely reasonable if she doesn't.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

yeah i dont quite understand why she would want to be president so bad and then not want to be president eight years later but i guess its possible

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

who gives up an easy opportunity to rule the world just cause they're too tired, nobody

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:14 (twelve years ago)

I look forward to the return of 'daughter of the south' gunslinging truck-loving hillary. that was really the weirdest thing.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)

she was a craven, awful campaigner and will make a total ass of herself again and WTF 2016 REALLY, GUYS?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:18 (twelve years ago)

hillary doing shots in pennsylvania bars

max, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:18 (twelve years ago)

https://gawker.campfirenow.com/room/359208/thumb/2938916/BillandHilary.jpg

max, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

scott brown was popular in that he polled as popular in massachusetts and was ahead for most of the campaign, the consensus amongst the mass political class was that he was a shoe in for reelection

Yes, I remember when she first announced her run I got a bunch of emails from dem groups begging for money for her campaign because it seemed like she didn't have much fo a chance.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

she was a craven, awful campaigner and will make a total ass of herself again and WTF 2016 REALLY, GUYS?

Morbs 2016!

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:20 (twelve years ago)

she was a craven, awful campaigner and will make a total ass of herself again and WTF 2016 REALLY, GUYS?

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:18 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

dont think itll stop her from winning the primary but yeah it does worry me in the general, worth considering that she is way more popular now than the first time she ran, and its not inconceivable that she could learn from her mistakes, but hillary as a politician historically was way too craven and then compounds it by not even picking the right spots, eg her vote for the iraq war

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:22 (twelve years ago)

a serial failed panderer m/l

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:23 (twelve years ago)

she was a craven, awful campaigner

This was true.

make a total ass of herself again

This is doubtful. She's had four years of dodging tv and self-aggrandizing and actually working and, by the time she'd have to start campaigning again, she'll have another couple years largely removed from the public altogether. Also? Her campaign was run by morons. If she chose to run in 2016, she'd have the Obama machine behind her instead of opposing her.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

I don't think she ran such a bad primary campaign considering what she was up against

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:34 (twelve years ago)

hillary does have a pretty good secretary of 'splaining stuff on her side though

some dude, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

can bill legally be vice president cause thats what she should do, how cute would that be

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:36 (twelve years ago)

scott brown was popular in that he polled as popular in massachusetts and was ahead for most of the campaign, the consensus amongst the mass political class was that he was a shoe in for reelection which is why you didnt see any congresspeople running against him, there are literally many many ways in which she couldve lost

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/senate/ma/massachusetts_senate_brown_vs_warren-2093.html

Scott Brown was ahead by a large margin initially, then around the end of May was barely ahead and stayed that way all summer, all the while sitting on a gigantic pile of campaign money that he didn't need to use against Coakley, then tanked sharply right before the first debate and never recovered; it was a tight race up until about the second week of September, after which Warren would have had to have eaten a baby full of coke on live television in order to lose.

By the time election day came around it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that Warren was going to win and it would have been shocking if she hadn't.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

Maybe this time she'll hire someone better than mark penn. I think dick morris is available.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

I mean the campaign was horrible and craven because she was slowly losing and attempting any trick in the book to catch up. maybe she can save the fake crying thing for the debates next time.

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

By the time election day came around it was pretty much a foregone conclusion that Warren was going to win and it would have been shocking if she hadn't.

― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:37 PM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sure but that was after all the campaigning happened

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

Also watching Scott Brown actually have to launch an ad campaign was incredibly funny; Warren won partially because she wasn't a gigantic feeb pushover whose entire platform was based upon crowing "IT'S KENNEDY'S SEAT!" ad infinitum and Brown didn't know how to deal with that.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

newsflash some wall st dudes are democrats

FWIW, Goldman Sachs donated mostly to Dems, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch (where are they now?) donated mostly to the GOP.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

goldman sachs went heavy for romney, not that it even matters

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

campaign donations are mostly symbolic

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

coakley was a horribel candidate, who fwiw wasnt running against a popular incumbent, and warren was a v good candidate

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

GS definitely in Romney camp in 2012, but historically there was a political divide in the investment houses through 2008.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

one thing I find funny is how insignificant the amount of $ is in wall street terms

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago)

btw i know weve talked abt this but how funny is it that romney began his campaign debrief by giving another 47% speech http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/mitt-romney-gifts-republicans.php

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:47 (twelve years ago)

lag∞n, how did you miss Obama shutting down lower Manhattan every 2 weeks last spring when he went to a Wall Street fatcat fundraiser, btw?

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:07 PM (21 minutes ago)

lives in vermont iirc

chief beef (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

when obama comes to visit the traffic backs up all the way to vermont

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

youre thinking of the anual phish fest

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

GG on two bonded rogue states:

There is now a virtually complete convergence between US and Israeli aggression, making US criticism of Israel impossible not only for all the usual domestic political reasons, but also out of pure self-interest: for Obama to condemn Israel's rogue behavior would be to condemn himself....

to condemn Israeli aggression here, (he) would need do no more than simply affirm universally recognized precepts of international law, ones that the US government has long claimed to support (even as it often violated them). That, however, is no longer possible for Obama - at least not without triggering a global laughing fit.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/15/israel-gaza-obama-assassinations

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:50 (twelve years ago)

From OpenSecrets.org (political donations from finance/insurance/real estate sector):

2004: $353,424,014
2008: $505,788,289
2012: $535,621,553

Its a pretty big chunk of the total, just small compared to the sums they sling around at the day job.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

yeah I think people just overrate how big 'a billion dollars is' in basically every other context

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

there are planes that cost a billion dollars!

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

i for instance have a billion dollars in change at the bottom of my desk drawer

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:55 (twelve years ago)

a billion dollars of hope and change

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Sen. John McCain is calling for establishment of a Watergate-style congressional committee to investigate the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

― it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:22 (Yesterday) Permalink

Yeah I watched cable news networks first time in a long time this morning and they were talking about it like it's actually a thing, and I just don't fucking get it. What is the scandal? Is there anything at stake here other than semantics?

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:07 (twelve years ago)

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/15/15194441-benghazi-hearing-turns-ugly-republicans-accuse-obama-of-lying-dems-fire-back

Features: the word "bodacious"

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

damn, is every hearing like that? glad the dems are hitting back

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

Does anyone outside Fox News think this is a "thing"?

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:14 (twelve years ago)

no

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/11/benghazi-conspriacy-theory-no-conceivable-motive
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/11/republicans-desperately-need-scandal

worth reading but i think drum misses the point here.

the "scandal" is that rice/obama wanted the american people to blame the attack on blowback from the "innocence of muslims" video. obama wants to blame america and curtail freedom of speech. but he and rice knew right away that it was al qaeda. but they want to hang an anti-muslim activist out to dry instead.

the conspiracy only makes sense if you believe the "apologizing for america" stuff

goole, Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

the other angle about denying some kind of response force that was close by, i don't really get what the idea is supposed to be there. obama just doesn't care about americans, or something.

goole, Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

have long had sympathy for idea that gop desired endgame is impeachment, before benghazi even happened, so

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

i feel sympathy for weird things?

it's a satrap, judy (Hunt3r), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

Re other aspects of it, I do wonder, even if I do not think the issue is a scandalous conspiracy-- Did the State Department turn down requests from the embassy for more security there? And if so,why?

curmudgeon, Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:25 (twelve years ago)

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/oct/18/sorting-out-truth-attack-libya/

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

>Re other aspects of it, I do wonder, even if I do not think the issue is a scandalous conspiracy-- Did the State Department turn down requests from the embassy for more security there? And if so,why?

Obama's failure to directly answer the town hall question about this in the second debate was pretty maddening, if you were already inclined to be suspicious about any of this, that moment really didn't help

Milton Parker, Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2012/11/aws-in-action-behind-the-scenes-of-a-presidential-campaign.html

I know a couple of these beardos

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:14 (twelve years ago)

hey mh how come youve never mentioned that you knew some guys who didnt computer stuff for obama

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:15 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, still not going away:

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/audio-romney-suggests-democrats-run-on-free-dental-care-in-2016.php

“What I would do if I were a Democrat running four years from now, I’d say, you know what, dental care will be included in Obamcare … and Republicans will say, no, that’s going to cost a trillion dollars, and the Democrats will say, that’s fine, you know, we’ll pay it,” Romney said in the recording.

Romney also suggested Obama’s support for “amnesty for those that are here illegally” was critical to Latino voters and urged the party to address immigration in Congress or risk getting beaten again in 2016.

“Going forward, clearly we have to have an immigration plan, this idea of just kicking this down the field until every four years the Democrats use it as an issue to hit us over the head with is nuts,” he said. “We have to have an immigration plan and program, and I certainly hope that our leaders in Washington are willing to put that forward.”

He sounded more hopeful on that front than others.

“Immigration we can solve,” he said, “but the giving away free stuff is a hard thing to compete with.”

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

idk, I was going to bring it up eventually

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:18 (twelve years ago)

Also not taking the hint:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/charlie_webster_black_voter_fraud.php

“If you live in a town of a few hundred people and you go to the post office every day, if there’s someone who doesn’t look like you, you usually know that,” Webster said. “And that’s why when folks called me and said, ‘Where did this Chinese man come from? We don’t have any Chinese people here. Where did they come from?” Well, I don’t know! It’s a good point.”

Webster said he wasn’t racist and that he had several black friends.

“There’s nothing about me that would be discriminatory. I know black people. I play basketball every Sunday with a black guy. He’s a great friend of mine. Nobody would ever accuse me of suggesting anything,” he said. “What I do suggest is that same-day voter registration without voter ID is pretty hard to police, and it’s odd that hundreds of people in a small town would show up.”

Webster hopes his investigation will settle his concerns.

“One of the things I’d like to do is nip this in the butt (sic) for good, and that’s why at my own expense I will do something after I’m no longer chairman,” Webster said. “I’m sick of hearing about it. Maybe there’s not a problem, maybe there is. I believe there is.”

BRB, buttnipping.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:18 (twelve years ago)

Romney might have a future as a democrat strategist

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:18 (twelve years ago)

Webster really dropped the ball by not accidentally saying "a chinaman" and making his statement a real three point shot

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

I know black people. I play basketball every Sunday with a black guy.

lol srs

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

basketball. with a black guy.

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:21 (twelve years ago)

are these people given a special racist script to read from?

Moodles, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:23 (twelve years ago)

have to admit that i'm pleased that someone else also mistakenly said "nip this in the butt". thought i was alone there

Z S, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:24 (twelve years ago)

the old "i'm not racist, i have a sick crossover" defense

goole, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:24 (twelve years ago)

i have plenty of chinese friends like for instance the guy who owns the chinese restaurant in town... oh wait

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:25 (twelve years ago)

I'm not racist...for christ's sake my dealer is black

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

when is John McCain going to die on a Sunday morning talk show? Christ this fucking windbag.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

I'm not racist; I'm running for office for petes sake!

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:27 (twelve years ago)

Meantime, Haley Barbour, getting down and dirty:

“We’ve got to give our political organization a very serious proctology exam. We need to look everywhere.”

He called for a top-to-bottom review of the get-out-the-vote operation...

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:29 (twelve years ago)

more fiber in the ballots imo

road to per diem (brownie), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago)

Ballots deep

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:36 (twelve years ago)

I know black people. I play basketball every Sunday with a black guy. Mr Chinaman, you're no black guy.

nickn, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:49 (twelve years ago)

lol my god angry old man mccain, cnn asked him why if hes so into benghazi he missed a briefing on it

“I have no comment about my schedule and I’m not going to comment on how I spend my time to the media,” McCain said.

Asked why he wouldn’t comment, McCain grew agitated: “Because I have the right as a senator to have no comment and who the hell are you to tell me I can or not?”

When CNN noted that McCain had missed a key meeting on a subject the senator has been intensely upset about, McCain said, “I’m upset that you keep badgering me.”

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/15/mccain-skips-benghazi-briefing-gets-testy-when-questioned-by-cnn

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:51 (twelve years ago)

haha remember when he was 'the good republican'

iatee, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:55 (twelve years ago)

well he did return reporters calls

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:56 (twelve years ago)

and barbequed foods

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago)

Elizabeth Warren does not have the chops to be a Presidential candidate, come on people.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:02 (twelve years ago)

"Did I mention that I'm still really upset about 2008?" added the Senator. "Fucking thing gnaws at me every day of my life."

clemenza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:13 (twelve years ago)

Elizabeth Warren does not have the chops to be a Presidential candidate, come on people.

― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:02 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this was my initial impression too, but she got a lot better v fast, so im not so sure now

lag∞n, Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:16 (twelve years ago)

"Hell, fuck 2008," he continued. "That up-jumped Texan prick took a big dump in my mouth in 2000. If I could brush my own teeth maybe I wouldn't still be able to taste it."

xp

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:16 (twelve years ago)

has any one ever dared McCain to brush his own teeth or

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:18 (twelve years ago)

:D

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:25 (twelve years ago)

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/11/draft-romney-movement-starts-here.html

i lol'd

Mordy, Thursday, 15 November 2012 23:59 (twelve years ago)

oh my god, if he tried that that would be delightful

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 16 November 2012 01:06 (twelve years ago)

@KarlRove
Christmas is around the corner. Looking for the perfect gift? Find it at http://www.rove.com

It's a signed copy of his book, of course.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 02:03 (twelve years ago)

and a CD of he and David Gregory rapping.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 02:04 (twelve years ago)

does he really have to push that crap, he got paid like a bazillion dollars for his useless super pac

iatee, Friday, 16 November 2012 02:13 (twelve years ago)

Ned aren't you selling the same book at AllRovey.com?

this is not a benghazi butthurt (some dude), Friday, 16 November 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago)

I ranked it half a star.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago)

There is a small, but measurable chance that Boehner and his seething cauldron of reactionaries will work themselves into such a frenzy over this benghazi thing that they'll try their hand at another fucking useless impeachment, rather than actually face working with Obama or the Senate with the idea of Getting Stuff Done. I think the tea baggers would gladly stoop to any kind of sabotage of the system rather than see their opponents accomplish anything.

Aimless, Friday, 16 November 2012 02:44 (twelve years ago)

At which point the Chamber of Commerce finally loses it. (That might be reason enough to enjoy.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 02:44 (twelve years ago)

slight encouragement - http://www.thenation.com/blog/171244/obama-reportedly-throw-down-mode-bush-taxes

balls, Friday, 16 November 2012 03:00 (twelve years ago)

My favorite thing about the Maine dude is the idea that if you were going to commit voter fraud, the way to do it would be to bus a bunch of black and Chinese voters into small, white Maine towns.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 16 November 2012 03:09 (twelve years ago)

Also, "White guy shocked he doesn't know any of the black people in his town."

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 16 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

I grew up in some very, very white counties.

I remember reading the population figures for my county once and seeing that there were four black people living somewhere in my county. I'd sure had never seen them.

I did know of the two black people in the next county over. My dad had sold them some real estate in the 70s.

pplains, Friday, 16 November 2012 03:20 (twelve years ago)

http://bigthink.com/think-tank/howard-dean-lets-go-over-the-fiscal-cliff

chief beef (k3vin k.), Friday, 16 November 2012 04:03 (twelve years ago)

ok the video isn't even working for me so idk why i even linked that, article not very interesting

chief beef (k3vin k.), Friday, 16 November 2012 04:11 (twelve years ago)

i was hoping he'd written a childrens' book

goole, Friday, 16 November 2012 05:14 (twelve years ago)

xxp I'm always surprised when I run into other black people way out in rural parts of WA or when I'm in Montana.

thraeds of life (The Reverend), Friday, 16 November 2012 10:59 (twelve years ago)

http://i50.tinypic.com/2uqzt4p.png

dawg what happened to you

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

I can only hope this Night of the Long Knives lasts until after Christmas.

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:10 (twelve years ago)

the ritual loser debasement and disassociation

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

Fox News chief Roger Ailes on Thursday explained what happened behind the scenes during the network's election-night snafu with Karl Rove, who criticized Fox for allegedly calling Ohio prematurely for President Obama. After Ailes saw the scene, he called executive vice president of news Michael Clemente and instructed him to have anchor Megyn Kelly confront the network's decision desk. Ailes urged Clemente to stay on the story and not break for commercial.

“As it turned out Rove was wrong. He backed down. Our guys were right. We stayed with it. Megyn did her famous walk down the hall. And it all worked out,” Ailes told TVNewser.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

"Megyn did her famous walk down the hall" = a nation of pervs gets excited

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

it all worked out

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:23 (twelve years ago)

Is there a gif ready of Megyn's famous walk down the hall or

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:27 (twelve years ago)

did the decision desk make a gif do we have that

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:30 (twelve years ago)

In a way it's kind of emblematic of the night and the next few days: "This can't possibly be true!" "In fact it is true, and you are completely wrong" "Okay, it might possibly be true"

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

Megyn Kelly's clothes all look like they come from the job-interview section of Limited Express.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

Ahahaha I love you, suzy.

grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

lol suzy

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

...and Gretchen Carlson's come from an equally bad place. Where shall we open the bidding?

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

Dress Barn, maybe?

this will surprise many (Nicole), Friday, 16 November 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

Romney's final gift to the party appears to be saying stupid things post-election that all the 2016 contenders can outdo each other denouncing.

clemenza, Friday, 16 November 2012 16:04 (twelve years ago)

Dave Wasserman‏@Redistrict

4,000+ new votes reported in Colorado, now within 0.03% of losing "Tipping Point State" honors to Pennsylvania:

iatee, Friday, 16 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

Meantime, behind the scenes at Narwhal -- with relevant/appropriate shit-talking about Orca

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/print/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

Krugman warning of "zombie ideas" on Soc Sec/Medicare age adjustments, plenty to fear from Dems imho:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/opinion/life-death-and-deficits.html

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 16 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

heartening http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/a-big-lift-from-all-of-us.html

"We're going to send a loud message to the leadership in the House, in the Senate and President Obama. Do not cut Social Security, do not cut Medicare, do not cut Medicaid," Sanders said. "Deficit reduction is a serious issue but it must be done in a way that is fair. We must not balance the budget on the backs of the elderly, the sick, the children or the poor."

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

it should be noted that many of the incentives obama had for offering the republicans such a sweetheart 'grand bargain' last time around particularly getting shot term stimulus to increase his reelection chances no longer exist

lag∞n, Friday, 16 November 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

That Atlantic article is cool, but I was far more interested in the project analysis and breakdown than any of the personality profiles

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

it was an Atlantic article, why were you expecting project analysis?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:20 (twelve years ago)

Yeeeah

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

On Benghazi and Susan Rice.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:45 (twelve years ago)

hahaha The Economist is really fed up with the Republican party, huh

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:48 (twelve years ago)

aren't we all

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

BTW this episode of this podcast is excellent, especially the New Hampshire tea party stuff

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/478/red-state-blue-state

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 16 November 2012 17:51 (twelve years ago)

the economist bloggers are not really the same as 'the economist', tho that doesn't mean that's not still true

iatee, Friday, 16 November 2012 17:52 (twelve years ago)

yeah it's weird how susan rice, who's not even in the line of responsibility for benghazi and merely parroted some cia talking points on it in the immediate aftermath, is their latest gambit to get some political advantage out of this. hilarious that their first action after this election and the 'lessons' they've learned is to go after a black female nominee w/ the same sotomayor 'unqualified' libel (can't wait to find out if susan rice reads the bronte sisters or whatever unforgivable offense). there are reasons to oppose a rice candidacy (though none remotely strong enough to block her), there are two different tacks involving rwanda alone, but the gop can only latch on to ones w/ no traction (or logic) or ones that shoot themselves in the foot.

balls, Friday, 16 November 2012 17:54 (twelve years ago)

yglesias making an argument for how gop could get leverage in fiscal cliff debate - http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/11/16/gop_should_fold_surrendering_now_preserves_maximum_leverage.html

balls, Friday, 16 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

omg this picture

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/techteam.jpg

paula boradwell (crüt), Friday, 16 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

that makes sense. (and in typical yglesias fashion, the post he links to does a much better job of explaining it.) the chances of the house republicans agreeing to a standalone tax plan friendly to obama are pretty much zero tho

xp

chief beef (k3vin k.), Friday, 16 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

the economist bloggers are not really the same as 'the economist', tho that doesn't mean that's not still true

Does that mean they don't have to follow the House editorial line? Or does this have something to do with the fact that the posts have a byline?

Theodora Celery, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

afaik they don't seem to have many restrictions and yeah they are not anonymous either

iatee, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

More in the way of general tech/media campaign wonkiness, from an outside view:

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/15/social-and-anti-social-media/

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

the cop obviously is holding the door open for obama at his impeachment trial

also getta loada these female dems

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8487/8190761469_a3937176f4_b.jpg

the late great, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDarhklkzQg

some dude, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago)

Are they accusing the chubby cop? xp

this will surprise many (Nicole), Friday, 16 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

David Petraeus, mall cop

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

Blart Did 9/11

haha xp

WilliamC, Friday, 16 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

lol @ some dude

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 16 November 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

THE TRUTH OBAMA DIDN'T WANT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO KNOW...FOR A FEW DAYS

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Friday, 16 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/11/petraeus-benghazi-2/

Petraeus Switches Up His Story on the Benghazi Attacks

By Spencer Ackerman
11.16.12
1:21 PM

goole, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

great!

goole, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

impeached by december

the late great, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

as long as it's spicier

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

obv the scandal is that the CIA was too far up its own asses to know what was happening in benghazi.

Mordy, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:10 (twelve years ago)

that's why petraeus resigned. he was so busy larping melrose place to pay attention to work.

Mordy, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:11 (twelve years ago)

larping melrose!!!!

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Friday, 16 November 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

Guess who's smiling.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 November 2012 21:16 (twelve years ago)

lol n1 mordy

Nhex, Friday, 16 November 2012 21:16 (twelve years ago)

Because he's done such a good job this past time:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/16/republican-party-chairman-priebus-seeking-re-election/

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 November 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago)

Unlike Michael Steele, who seemed relieved to have lost that job, Priebus knows it's this or nothing.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 16 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

Frankly there have been whispers at the Republican National Committee and elsewhere that Romney has used even more grotesque language, suggesting that the loss is due to Hispanic voters who have become enamored with Obamacare.

Jennifer Rubin @ WaPo

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 17 November 2012 00:06 (twelve years ago)

benghazi!

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 17 November 2012 01:38 (twelve years ago)

That's your answer for everything.

Aimless, Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:25 (twelve years ago)

Annnnnnd 2012 summed up in a photo:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8065/8191317327_5180e95d98_b.jpg

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 November 2012 14:38 (twelve years ago)

hahaha

WilliamC, Saturday, 17 November 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

hahah wow

Nhex, Saturday, 17 November 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago)

who is the girl

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

Maroney of US Gymnastics fame.

Gukbe, Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:48 (twelve years ago)

http://mckaylaisnotimpressed.tumblr.com/

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:49 (twelve years ago)

such a Narwhal photo

paula boradwell (crüt), Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

huh, i missed that whole thing.
tbf, i missed the entire olympics

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

i wish there was a snappy way to communicate that i am not impressed with most of those photoshops

K3v Ink (some dude), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

you're such a grouch lately. you need to eat more bran.

Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:07 (twelve years ago)

I did like this one, though:

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/185lo75etkt0tjpg/original.jpg

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:14 (twelve years ago)

stevie i was making an obvious joke jeez

K3v Ink (some dude), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago)

:/

lag∞n, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)

i often miss obvious jokes, sorry some dude. maybe i should eat more bran...

Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:17 (twelve years ago)

:*

lag∞n, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:18 (twelve years ago)

oh no, a bran-eating zombe, look out

K3v Ink (some dude), Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:22 (twelve years ago)

after all these years of living on this planet, i still don't really know what bran is

collardio gelatinous, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

It surrounds the germ, protecting it.

Aimless, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

That shop is hilare. Kind of looks like the cover of a Dare video or something. "Look kids, we're here to set the record straight. Say nope to dope!"

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 17 November 2012 20:28 (twelve years ago)

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/an-anti-ip-turn-for-the-gop/

iatee, Saturday, 17 November 2012 23:22 (twelve years ago)

The update is hilarious. "Holy shit, we can't actually be seen to be doing something GOOD here."

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 November 2012 23:42 (twelve years ago)

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/62114.html#.UKhKWOtmW4V.twitter

balls, Sunday, 18 November 2012 02:58 (twelve years ago)

Hmm....

That's about 14 months old, though, so if it were gonna stick to something, it would've stuck by now.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 18 November 2012 03:04 (twelve years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121115/us-cutting-defense-spending/

Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 18 November 2012 13:54 (twelve years ago)

"The report argued that the money could be spent instead on lightweight machine guns for warfighters in Afghanistan."

Cute.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

grocery stores = $9 billion? are they giving away groceries for free?

paula boradwell (crüt), Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

ThinkProgress ‏@thinkprogress
Lieberman breaks with McCain, Graham on Libya investigation: "I respectfully separate from my two amigos"

lol

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

muchas gracias

paula boradwell (crüt), Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

"Beef jerky so good it will shock and awe your taste buds," the report said. "That is the goal of an ongoing Pentagon project, which is attempting to develop its own brand of jerky treats that are the bomb! Only, the money is coming from a program specially created to equip soldiers with the weapons they need."

Judah Ben Ghazi (how's life), Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

Here in Miami we'd respond "Vete par' carajo."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

Had to laugh at the talk on This Week about whether or not Romney was the "de facto" leader of the Republican Party. Survey says...no. Someone suggested you'll never see him speak at a future convention, and I'd have to agree. The Democrats keep Carter at arm's length, but they beam him in on satellite; W. is still under wraps, but I bet he'll be back eventually. Romney, can't see him back ever, with the possible exception of some major scandal destroying Obama in his second term--if that happened, maybe he'd get a if-you'd-only-gone-with-me pass.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

yeah ex-prez can't totally be swept under the rug no matter how unpopular they are after their term, guys who ran and lost are a different story

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

hard to call anyone a de facto leader after losing an election

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

xpost

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

Did Mondale or Dukakis ever come back and speak at a convention? Gore was there in '08, but that's a little different--unique loss (or "loss"), Nobel, VP. (Mondale had VP on his resume too.)

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago)

W. is still under wraps, but I bet he'll be back eventually.

Doubtful.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

i dunno, W. could easily someday have the same "our last guy that won! twice!" sheen for the GOP that Clinton had at the DNC this year

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago)

i dont think anyone likes w anymore is the problem, clinton was always v popular

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago)

W. has that whole problem w/ being one of the worst presidents in american history

Mordy, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

and being widely considered one of the worst presidents ever doesnt help xp

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

That, and my own sense is that he's still liked by Republicans--even with him having been an albatross for two elections in a row--in a way that Romney never was, except for about six minutes after the first debate. If his brother runs in 2016, that would also factor in. (xxxposts)

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

yeah, honestly i have no idea if most Republicans do/will think of W as a bad president who did terrible things in retrospect or if his only crime to them is angering dems enough that they got it together to elect Obama

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

his presidency culminating in one of the worst financial disasters in the countries history, leaving behind two ongoing wars

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

no one wants to link themselves to W; they're going to have to wait at least four more years to pretend that was an okay time
also we have to get out of the immediate ramification OF his presidency: the wars, the economic collapse. that shit was long ranging

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

ushering in an era of democratic dominance is enough i think to cause plenty republicans to not really care for bush, tho theyve got lots other causes to choose from too

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

yeah but do THEY blame him for the economy or get chagrined when you bring up "weapons of mass destruction"? xp

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

I only catch Limbaugh infrequently on a Buffalo station, but--and I assume he reflects something of general party thinking--he still cheerleads for W. He was going on the other day about 4.5% unemployment for most of Bush's eight years (he probably just made up the number).

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

i'm not saying Bush will be welcomed to the RNC with open arms in 2016 (unless, as said, Jeb runs), but if they manage to stay out of the White House for MORE than 8 years, they might get pretty damn nostalgic about him by 2020 or 2024 (xp)

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

He was also the last white president, and that's a big selling point.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

some republicans consider bush a failure and some stick by him, p much everyone else htes the guy, ie the gop knows theres no angle in publicly embracing him

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

Thing is, there's been a lot of "He was a financial disaster, expanded government, Medicare Part D, fuck him" talk now since 2008; as long as that continues to hold sway he'll be persona non grata. The wars aren't seen as triumphant, more as rolling exhaustions; by now only the most gung-ho out there are wanting another one and I suspect plenty of the formerly war happy have heard from a few constituents directly now about what it was all good for, ie, not much except ruined limbs and lives and worse. The one possible way W. could be back is if there's some sort of tie in on the 'compassionate conservative'/"hey he got a lot of Latino voters" front.

There might be a lingering nostalgia in an older and whiter rump -- as it were -- in the party. But as time goes on that faction's going to keep dying out all the more.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

As for the fantasy of Jeb Bush:

"Hi there voters! The brother of W. is running!"

"Oh good GOD."

Fin.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

i mean maybe if he went on to have a carteresque late career he could rehab his image, better get workin, lots of brush to clear

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

lol yeah jeb tough break

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

also certainly doesnt help w or jeb that people arent that psyched abt bush sr either

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

Or maybe if he got together with Clinton and made an Ex-Presidents Gone Wild DVD.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

i think having the same last name as a former president matters way more than how they were regarded as a president. W did just as well as if his last name was Reagan.

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

the bush brand is tarnished, sitting in the bargain bin, no one wants that

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

W did just as well as if his last name was Reagan.

― K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:46 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

losing the popular vote?

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago)

getting the nomination in and of itself is pretty far, let alone winning (or "winning") the electoral college and then a 2nd term

K3v Ink (some dude), Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

having name recognition is helpful, but it may be slightly over determined to attribute his whole political career to it, as for the reagan conter factual its a mystery, its weird tho none of reagans children ran seeing as a presidential name is so powerful

as for getting elected to a 2nd term, i think everyone knew who he was by then

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago)

imho tho being born w/powerful political connections is a much bigger part of george w bushs story than name recognition

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:00 (twelve years ago)

I don't think jeb is DOA for 2016 but if he runs they are going to have to store dubya in an underground locker or something

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:11 (twelve years ago)

http://i48.tinypic.com/2vwtdvc.gif

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago)

said this somewhere else but dubya is like an ex-bf who the gop is still secretly in love with and whom nobody can really compare to.

they don't like him...but they love him.

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

they don't like him...but they love him.

Basically the point I was making. Sometimes, like with Limbaugh, they're not so secret about it.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

there may be a segment of the electorate who love bush, but thats gonna be true of any president, i dont think he has any special powers particularly

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:22 (twelve years ago)

he represents the tea party ideal still, a stubbon anti-elitist w/ wacko christian beliefs

but the thing is as dumb as he was he had politically competent handlers (+9/11), everyone else who tries to be neo-dubya can't thread the needle

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago)

All conjecture, but Bush love strikes me as something deeper, almost like Nixon love. Republicans hated Nixon for the mess he left the party in, but there was also a loyalty that transcended that. I don't think you see anything comparable with Carter.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

it's less about *dubya the dude* and more about what he represented / still represents I think

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

making the rounds:
http://front.moveon.org/just-released-audio-of-former-reaganbush-advisor-lays-out-how-gop-planned-to-win-the-votes-of-racists/

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago)

he represents the tea party ideal still, a stubbon anti-elitist w/ wacko christian beliefs

but the thing is as dumb as he was he had politically competent handlers (+9/11), everyone else who tries to be neo-dubya can't thread the needle

― iatee, Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:25 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark

tea partiers hate bush! i mean, they don't actually hate them, but if you hear one of their 'leaders' on the radio or something they're always denouncing his spending etc

chief beef (k3vin k.), Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:37 (twelve years ago)

him*

chief beef (k3vin k.), Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:37 (twelve years ago)

Same with Nixon--the sense of aggrievement, the pathological hatred of elites/media/Ivy League, etc. It wasn't Nixon the person, who bonded with no one, but what he represented. The Nixon loyalty carries on via Palin and others. (xposts)

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

now that bush is despised by most of the country a lot of them distance themselves from him and 'of course people hated him look at all the spending' etc

but my point is more that he still exists as their ideal form for a politician more so than reagan or ron paul or whoever xp

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago)

http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/18/rubio-makes-his-iowa-debut-as-possible-future-of-the-republican-party/

Ladies and gentlemen, 2016 has begun and Rubio is first in line.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago)

but my point is more that he still exists as their ideal form for a politician more so than reagan or ron paul or whoever xp

I think that's way off. GOP would run zombie Reagan eight more times before they'd ever go back to a Bush again.

pplains, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:46 (twelve years ago)

I more mean that they want someone to run the country like bush did not like reagan did. reagan is only so great because people have been so distanced from his actual presidency that he exists mostly as a fictional character.

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

he represents the tea party ideal still, a stubbon anti-elitist w/ wacko christian beliefs

― iatee, Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:25 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

All conjecture, but Bush love strikes me as something deeper, almost like Nixon love. Republicans hated Nixon for the mess he left the party in, but there was also a loyalty that transcended that. I don't think you see anything comparable with Carter.

― clemenza, Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:26 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yall are so deep in the weeds, any leaders gonna have some supports no matter how disastrous his reign, there are people in russia who still adore stalin, to clear a few things up here im gonna give you a peak at the presidential lovability index™ of our last four former commanders in chief

1. bill clinton
2. ronald reagan
3. george w bush
4. george h w bush

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:53 (twelve years ago)

I am not talking about dubya the dude I am talking about dubyaness

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

they love bush when they find santorum lacking

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

well yeah obvs there was something compelling abt w, he got elected twice, but the point still stands that as ranked against other presidents rather than fake primary contenders he is not that compelling

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

Think iatee meant something else there.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

his ness is not that compelling

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

his ness is still the core of the gop!

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

the group of people for whom his ness really hits home is not that large

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

compared to other presidents

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

I'm not talking about voters as much as how the party operates

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago)

like the faux cowboy who ignores facts and doesn't compromise is the spirit in the room at all times

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

some people who have disproportionate influence on gop politics like a w type of guy, the same people who have caused them to lose tons elections over the last two cycles, aka not that many people love w or w's w-ness

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

again I'm not really talking about w's actual approval rating or whatever just that the disproportionate influence he's had means that the gop is still his party and is still playng by his rules. so his politics and attitude are the form that anybody else is ultimately being compared against.

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

you arent talking abt ~anything~

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:09 (twelve years ago)

I am talking about the world of plantonic forms, I am sorry if it is beyond you

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago)

The 2012 GOP worldview seemed like some clumsy mix of W., Reagan, and Nixon.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

iatee sniffs the winter air closes trench coat around himself and stalks into the night

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

I think W could be rehabilitated only if he takes on some kind of admirable post-presidential role, a la Carter. Nothing about the "Bush years" is ever going to inspire nostalgia even in party die-hards. Iraq, Katrina, economic meltdown -- those are going to resonate for a long time for anyone who was alive and old enough to pay attention. And so far he sure hasn't shown any inclination to do much of anything constructive or high-profile. Most likely he's happy to just chill out and not worry about what people think.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

pulling is fedora down against the uncomprehending world his gaze wanders 'whatre you lookin at dog'

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:13 (twelve years ago)

he says to an actual dog

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

it is not my fault that I am the only one who can see cowboy spirits

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago)

xposts I mean, if they could enshrine only the first term, when he was the righteous warrior leading the fight against the savage hordes and effortlessly rolling the war machine over the limply protesting bodies of squishy liberals, then sure. But that would require a degree of selective memory that I don't think even Fox can conjure.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

I do get the feeling that W. sincerely doesn't ever want to be involved in politics again. Nixon was obsessed with rehabilitation; Carter, in his way, seems almost as obsessed; and seeing Gingrich on This Week this morning, it would seem that he ain't ever going away. (xxxpost)

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

out of any president bush prob wanted to be in politics the least in the first place

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

soto stop right there

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

I'm not sure bush's rehabilitation really matters, the gop will be running on imaginary reagan's accomplishments 20 years from now (if it exists)

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:20 (twelve years ago)

I mean people aren't gonna just forget the great recession

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:22 (twelve years ago)

soto stop right there

hm?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

Stop.

Soto time.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago)

I am talking about the world of plantonic forms, I am sorry if it is beyond you

this fuckin guy

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:29 (twelve years ago)

Here's your hat, what's your hurry?

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/top-republicans-excoriate-romney-on-sunday-talk-shows.php?ref=fpa

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

he's happy to just chill out and not worry about what people think.

"now watch this drive"

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

“It’s been well said that you have a political problem when the voters don’t like you, but you’ve got a real problem when the voters think you don’t like them,” said conservative columnist George Will on ABC’s “This Week.” “Quit despising the American people.”

Will then turned from the mirror and went "Oh right, Romney..."

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

“I don’t know if he understood that he was saying something that was insulting,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

I think this is true. Romney's persistent cluelessness about how and why the things he said (and thought) appeared to other people was maybe his biggest political flaw. His way of seeing the world is so engrained that he can't even convincingly pretend to perceive anything outside it.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:04 (twelve years ago)

ya guys been enrobed in multiple bubbles his whole life

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:06 (twelve years ago)

Anyway, guys, we've been doing this all wrong:

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-allen-palin-for-president-20121118,0,1525685.story

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

I got this far and my neck snapped back:

"A national exit poll conducted by CNN asked voters whether Palin was a factor in their voting. Of those who said yes, 56% voted for McCain versus 43% for Barack Obama."

Doesn't she realize how awful that is?!

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago)

I can imagine that the next Sarah Palin book will be some kind of affirming, centrist pivot. Called "Reconciliation" or "Common Ground" or something. All the commonsense things that us plain folks can agree on.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

palin is out of the game yall im sry shes not coming back rip

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:36 (twelve years ago)

Palin/Beck 2016. A team for the ages.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

i mean you cannot go from calling out yr reality tv stars daughters haters on twitter to being a legit political force

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

I really hate that she is, what she should have done is spent 4 years w/ political consultants and studying flash cards, she coulda got the nom for sure w/ the right handlers

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

yeah seems like she just didnt have the heart for it

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

idk man, Reagan was an actor

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

hermancaincreepysmile.gif

Aimless, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

i mean you cannot go from calling out yr reality tv stars daughters haters on twitter to being a legit political force

You also used to not be able to go from being a black guy named Hussein to being president! Sarah could be exactly the pathbreaker you don't see coming.

I mean, I don't think so. But there's no reason for her not to try. There are books to be sold and speaking fees to be generated.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

But she trades on her looks, and those won't be with us for much longer.

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago)

You also used to not be able to go from being a black guy named Hussein to being president! Sarah could be exactly the pathbreaker you don't see coming.

― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, November 18, 2012 2:51 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol dude

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

ladies and gentlemen the next president of the united states of america

http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2012/news/sarah-palin-300.jpg

lag∞n, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

I almost think she has something to gain from running next time just cause even w/ a total clusterfuck at least she's on tv, her alternative is completely falling off the national radar and just doing county fairs or whatever

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

not predicting she will, just if I were her agent I'd suggest it

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 19:58 (twelve years ago)

Shee-oot, Dana. The fact that the mostly rural, agricultural and poorer states of these here Yew-knighted States rake in far more federal dollars than they contribute is an open secret known to everyone but the rubes in those states who complain they're being taken to the cleaners by the feds.

Aimless, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

Shit's been hard the last few years for peddles of received wisdom, with or without a fiscal cliff to fall off of

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

It should be trotted out every time that complaint comes up...

Nhex, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

i have contradictory things to say!

the 'tea party' a phenomenon DOES have a strong element of the old right/paleolibertarianism about it which does contradict strongly with the neoconservative big-state adventurism of the bush years.

however it seems to me like the conservative harsh judgment of bush NOW is basically picking up on those reasons in a back-dated way. oh sure he spent too much, medicare d, cut a deal on education with ted kennedy, too much nation-building. now you tell us!

like, the rest of the country hates bush because his wars turned out badly, tortured, let the economy blow itself up. but conservatives have to find conservative answers for agreeing with the country's basic judgment, no matter what they thought or said at the time.

goole, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

Jonah Goldberg will tell you that he and his rag complained about "compassionate conservatism," Medicare D, and No Child Left Behind at the time but why do it loudly when there's political advantage to be wrought from winning midterm elections and calling Vietnam veterans traitors?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

this has been hashed out before a hundred times but is worth repeating - the tea party is nothing more than a rebranding of the right flank of the GOP. its mouthpieces - at least before they were co-opted by the party - are probably a little clearer when it comes to the distinctions between
'real tea party patriots' and the party itself, but rank and file teabaggers are just regular old republicans

chief beef (k3vin k.), Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

these people didn't just appear out of the swamp or something

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

like there really isn't an issue where they are paleo in some meaningful way. pretty much follow the GOP party line w/ Israel or Iran or whatever.

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

well i agree about 'rebranding', and yes, a demographic doesn't appear out of thin air. it's also a part of why romney misread the electorate so badly: there are a ton more hard-right types identifying as independents now.

but, to the extent that it matters, i think the change in emphasis of ideas from foreign expansiveness to domestic retrenchment matters.

xp how about the ryan budget?

goole, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

yes it crawled out of the swamp

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

I think that has to do w/ the recession and the fact that the GOP doesn't run foreign policy atm so there's no push from the top on very many foreign policy issues. xp

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 20:50 (twelve years ago)

like the only thing that really breaks with precedent is the reaction to wall st and in this case the GOP is fine w/ sitting back and letting the bailouts stick to the dems. it's not like the tea party was making pro-Dodd frank noise.

iatee, Sunday, 18 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

Anyone interested in pooling some cash and purchasing these?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/333599/exclusive-penn-state-reportedly-rejected-rick-santorums-papers-eliana-johnson

I think it could be a real windfall down the road for ILX.

clemenza, Sunday, 18 November 2012 21:13 (twelve years ago)

Binders of Santorum.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 18 November 2012 21:18 (twelve years ago)

a sticky problem

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 November 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

Vanilla latte, extra santorum please

Z S, Monday, 19 November 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago)

Q for Ned: is there any indication that a CA Dem gov/legislature will be able to solve some of the state's financial problems?

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 19 November 2012 02:23 (twelve years ago)

Eh, maybe. I trust Brown more than the legislature in this regard, and I don't really trust Brown! He's made some attempts but prison and legal reform would be kinda key here.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 19 November 2012 02:28 (twelve years ago)

Why would you trust Brown at all? He's such an inept douchebag.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Monday, 19 November 2012 02:33 (twelve years ago)

So does anyone buy any part of this "Anonymous hacked ORCA, saved the election" story?

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 19 November 2012 02:59 (twelve years ago)

It's interesting to think about, and some of it seems to line up, but I'm still a doubter.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 19 November 2012 03:00 (twelve years ago)

I think it's more likely that ORCA wanted free gifts from Romney, didn't get any, and decided to sabotage itself.

clemenza, Monday, 19 November 2012 03:00 (twelve years ago)

Romney teams seems to have hacked themselves p well on their own

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 03:01 (twelve years ago)

FWIW, having listened to Brown's We the People radio show for the better part of a decade while he was in the wilderness (so to speak), I think its pretty remarkable that America lets people like him near the reins. I haven't followed the self-imposed mess that is California politics much, but I think there's far worse options than Brown.

in the Land of the Yik Yak (Sanpaku), Monday, 19 November 2012 03:02 (twelve years ago)

never attribute to malice etc.

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Monday, 19 November 2012 03:04 (twelve years ago)

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rubio-declines-to-say-how-old-earth-is

I'm not a scientist, man....Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I'm not sure we'll ever be able to answer that. It's one of the great mysteries.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

man, even republicans who believe in science are afraid to admit it. fucked up times.

drunk 'n' white's elements of style (Hurting 2), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that's a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

the ol' how crazy are you really ballet

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

"We are not currently taking questions on this matter until after the 2014 elections"

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

I'm not a scientist, maaaaan

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

the followup questions about rap music are even better imo

max, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Your autobiography also has to be the first time a politician has cited a love of Afrika Bambaataa. Did you have a favorite Afrika Bambaataa song?
Marco Rubio: All the normal ones. People forget how dominant Public Enemy became in the mid 80s. No one talks about how transformative they were. And then that led to the 90s and the sort of East Coast v. West Coast stuff, which is kinda when I came of age. There's a great documentary on Tupac called Resurrection about the last few years of Tupac's life and how he transformed. And, ironically, how this East Coast rapper became this West Coast icon, back when all that Death Row/Sean Combs stuff was going on. Hip Hop's 30 years old now and it's crossed over and sort of become indistinguishable from pop music in general. You know, many people say Nicki Minaj is a rapper, but she's also a singer. Kanye's another guy who's also a rapper, but his songs aren't pure rap anymore. There's also all these collaborations going on, which confuses everything. You know you've got the guy from Miami, Pitbull, who's on TV selling a car and then he's advertising for Dr. Pepper.

GQ: Your three favorite rap songs?
Marco Rubio: "Straight Outta Compton" by N.W.A. "Killuminati" by Tupac. Eminem's "Lose Yourself."

GQ: Is there a song you play to psych you up before a vote in the Senate?
Marco Rubio: I'm not like an athlete. The only guy that speaks at any sort of depth is, in my mind, Eminem. He's a guy that does music that talks about the struggles of addiction and before that violence, with growing up in a broken family, not being a good enough father. So, you know that's what I enjoy about it. It's harder to listen to than ever before because I have a bunch of kids and you just can't put it on. But in terms of psyching yourself up, I don't have time for that. You know you can't put on earphones and the storm the floor and vote [laughs].

GQ: So, Pitbull's too cheesy?
Marco Rubio: His songs are all party songs. There's no message for him, compared to like an Eminem. But look, there's always been a role for that in American music. There's always been a party person, but he's a young guy. You know, maybe as he gets older, he'll reflect in his music more as time goes on. I mean, he's not Tupac. He's not gonna be writing poetry.

Read More http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201212/marco-rubio-interview-gq-december-2012#ixzz2CgZptgv5

max, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

the GOP considers this mealymouthed cherub "their" Obama.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago)

"do you notice and recognize miracles?"

K3v Ink (some dude), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:16 (twelve years ago)

haha w/o ever thinking about it my sense was pitbull was older than rubio

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

It's true, the republican party could use more Public Enemy influence`

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Did you have a favorite Afrika Bambaataa song?
Marco Rubio: All the normal ones.

the fuck

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

Pitbull's kid is a classmate of my cousin's oldest; he says he's a total bro and whenever he's in town he picks up the kid himself.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

So because you're not a scientist, man, you get to be an idiot? Pls do fuck off Rube-io

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Do you have a favorite Reagan policy?
Marco Rubio: All the normal ones.

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:20 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Your autobiography also has to be the first time a politician has cited a love of Afrika Bambaataa. Did you have a favorite Afrika Bambaataa song?
Marco Rubio: All the normal ones. People forget how dominant Public Enemy became in the mid 80s. No one talks about how transformative they were. And then that led to the 90s and the sort of East Coast v. West Coast stuff, which is kinda when I came of age. There's a great documentary on Tupac called Resurrection about the last few years of Tupac's life and how he transformed. And, ironically, how this East Coast rapper became this West Coast icon, back when all that Death Row/Sean Combs stuff was going on. Hip Hop's 30 years old now and it's crossed over and sort of become indistinguishable from pop music in general. You know, many people say Nicki Minaj is a rapper, but she's also a singer. Kanye's another guy who's also a rapper, but his songs aren't pure rap anymore. There's also all these collaborations going on, which confuses everything. You know you've got the guy from Miami, Pitbull, who's on TV selling a car and then he's advertising for Dr. Pepper.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:20 (twelve years ago)

would love to see this guy's answer to "did you have sexual relations with that woman?"

Doctor Casino, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago)

oh he means the hits, not the "normal sounding" Bambaataa songs. haha, ok goole, give him a little credit

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

all the normal types of relations

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Did you have a favorite Afrika Bambaataa song?
Marco Rubio: All the normal ones.

the fuck

― goole, Monday, November 19, 2012 11:18 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

all the normal one

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:24 (twelve years ago)

"all the normal ones" is just too much.
have to believe bam would tell this dude to fuck off

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago)

these rap answers are not really that bad for a normal dude except he pretended to know who afrika bambaataa was

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago)

if youre from miami and talk shit about party rap i dont know what to say to you

max, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

it's some kind of huge cosmic irony that this guy's name is "white guy"

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:28 (twelve years ago)

i await the necessary discussion of how dre pac and em's music has affected rubio's understanding of THE STREETS
http://thelaughbutton.com/news/college-newspaper-responds-joke-hannibal-buress-special/#

Everybody did shit, art happened! (forksclovetofu), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

I'm as pissed at GQ reporter thinking he got a good gotcha question on the order of "Do you have a favorite Chills song?"

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

if youre from miami and talk shit about party rap i dont know what to say to you

― max, Monday, November 19, 2012 11:27 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh no electro police

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

Article needed a better PE follow-up, like "do you think it's true that suckers got authority?"

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

"Would you say Chuck D's words – can't truss this – apply to the modern GOP?"

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

GQ: Who's your best friend?
Marco Rubio: My wife. We talk every day.

GQ: Besides your wife.
Marco Rubio: [South Carolina Senator and Tea Party favorite] Jim DeMint. He's a great source of wisdom as a person who's had to make decisions that have made him unpopular in his own party. Jeb Bush is another guy I admire for his ability to analyze issues and call them for what they are.

what a sad man

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

I know, right? It's like he couldn't shout out a friend all normal-like, had to make it a political question

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

feel sort of bad for him that his racist party has tricked him into thinking hes a legit presidential candidate

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

yeah dude is toast, presidentially speaking

beef richards (Mr. Que), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

idk I think he's got as much a shot as anyone atm

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

(at the nom, obv not presidency)

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

I can't imagine the sort of person who considers Jim DeMint a bestie.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

dont think rubio has the juice

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

i don't know if it's worse to lie about it!

xp

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago)

rubio's biggest problem is that he comes off like a total asshole, I think. but I'm willing to believe he could get the nom in a michael steele-esque manner.

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

Does he? To me he comes off like a guy who's been focus-grouped to death.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

it's Total Assholes of the Duopoly Day

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/andrew_cuomo_fake_democrat/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

mr rubio, who do you prefer between your wife, mr shakur & mr demint. take a moment to consider your answer

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Monday, 19 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

ya to me he just comes off as phony lightweight and charisma deficient, maybe there is some overwhelming urge amongst republicans to nominate a latino but i sort of doubt it

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

If Cuomo allows Republicans to subvert the will of the voters of New York, so that he has an easier time cutting taxes and rolling back regulations, he shouldn’t be allowed to sell himself to future primary voters as a progressive.

I don't think that's ever been his plan

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

kinda feeling paper tiger vibes from cuomo too

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago)

he's already used Sandy to rhetorically define himself as a Dem Who Takes Climate Change Seriously, that passes for progressive in our shrunken rotting onionskin of a political spectrum.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

I think it's more 'trying to predict what's gonna be the hot subject 4 years from now'

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 17:05 (twelve years ago)

Come to think of it, I can't think what my fave Chills song off that album is that isn't "Pink Frost". It's been too many years since the college radio show.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:08 (twelve years ago)

"I Love My Leather Jacket"

all the fun's drained outta fiscalcliff, huh guys

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago)

whatever you say, Morbs

WilliamC, Monday, 19 November 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago)

Article needed a better PE follow-up, like "do you think it's true that suckers got authority?"

"It occurred to me."

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago)

these rap answers are not really that bad for a normal dude except he pretended to know who afrika bambaataa was

― lag∞n, Monday, November 19, 2012 11:26 AM (49 minutes ago)

^^my impression

chief beef (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:16 (twelve years ago)

kind of feel like he read an article or part of a book someone gifted him about rap history, but he mostly listens to tupac

under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

I wish more republicans were required to give detailed descriptions of their hip hop preferences in high profile interviews.

Moodles, Monday, 19 November 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago)

idk this kinda seems in line with the 'smart fratboy'/'smart jock' impression i've had of him to this point

chief beef (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

I wish more republicans were required to give detailed descriptions of their hip hop preferences in high profile interviews.

MC Saxby

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:34 (twelve years ago)

kind of feel like he read an article or part of a book someone gifted him about rap history, but he mostly listens to tupac

― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Monday, November 19, 2012 12:21 PM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this is a totally reasonable approach imho

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

I'm sure the GOP is cynically convinced that getting Republicans to memorize half a dozen hip-hop records is the key to getting back the minority vote, rather than changing their actual policy.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 19 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

heres the plan nominate a hispanic guy and uh make sure to have him read the wikipedia.com/rap_music page, 2016 here we come!

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

are you saying that wouldn't work?

bill paxman (darraghmac), Monday, 19 November 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

just retire now hillary

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

the question is not whether that is a shitty plan it's whether or not a non-shitty plan even exists for them

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdvHwtRdg_I

Never Forget

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

AMAZING. See the GOP is meme-central, they just need to start a youtube account of all their gaffes and the youth vote will pick up.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 19 November 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago)

mc robe

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, looking at the track list, the only others songs are "Kaleidoscope World" and "I Love My Leather Jacket" that strike any memory chord

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Monday, 19 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/absurd-congressional-charts

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

v proud, v baffled @ 11.

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2012/11/19/11/enhanced-buzz-6612-1353344130-2.jpg

this looks like something they would use on the daily show

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

my faves are 9 because it looks like a come-on, and 16 because it is our most lynchian senator at his most lynchian

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

our most lynchian senator

LOL, brilliant.

Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Monday, 19 November 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

ha, ty

the tumblr is well worth your time

http://senatecharts.tumblr.com/

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:02 (twelve years ago)

I was hoping that was going to be a reference to a Grassley one. Did not disappoint.

mh, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

oh jesus christ the first one on the tumblr is from our other senator

mh, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

these are both lolhueg

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdlh8k0euO1rlnmpto1_1280.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdlgzwUExB1rlnmpto1_1280.jpg

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

Ed Kilgore pointing out the fissures in the Obama Coalition. At last someone's pointing them out. But I'm not optimistic.

At a minimum, if Obama accepts as part of some “grand bargain” on fiscal issues actual benefit cuts in Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, and/or major structural changes in how these programs operate, there will be a backlash among Democrats in and out of Congress that could be significantly fiercer than the one favoring a “public option” which for a while threatened the enactment of the Affordable Care Act of 2010. And now that the threat of a Republican president has subsided, we can also expect to hear much more vocal Democratic objections to Obama’s foreign policy, particularly its continuation of the “war on terror” and its heavy use of drone strikes in the Greater Middle East. Long-simmering progressive resentment of Obama administration positions on civil liberties, and on its support for relatively high defense spending, will also re-emerge for the same reason.

There is, however, a paradox at the center of any prospects for a revolt-from-the-left against Obama. Nothing mobilizes intra-party opposition quite like disgruntlement with a president, as LBJ, George H.W. Bush, and at some points Bill Clinton could have told you. But as I often observed in dismissing the prospects of any significant primary challenge to Obama in 2012 despite occasionally white-hot anger from liberal elites, it is almost impossible to launch a left-bent intraparty challenge to a Democratic Party leader who has a strong personal bond with minority voters (this was true to some extent even with Jimmy Carter back in 1980, and also had something to do with the failure of unhappy liberals to challenge Clinton in 1996, and neither man had remotely the kind of support among minority voters that Obama has enjoyed since he first announced for president).

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

Why is that Senator describing the military strategy of the Battle of Cannae?

Gukbe, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

sort of pessimistic about there being any meaningful backlash. the "threat of a republican president" never subsides iirc

chief beef (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

'93, never forget

xp

goole, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

we can also expect to hear much more vocal Democratic objections to Obama’s foreign policy, particularly its continuation of the “war on terror” and its heavy use of drone strikes

puhleeeeeeeeeeeze

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

tldr; there are not a lot of far-left white people in america

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:16 (twelve years ago)

I thought that I'd voted for Grassley in some election where the challenger had no chance so that I could feel I had a part of his ridiculous legacy, but after checking his reelection dates I think I'm wrong :(

mh, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

ha yeah i'll believe it when i see it xp morbs

xp not a lot of far-left anything people in america

chief beef (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

"we" don't want to undermine Rodham/Cuomo/Bidenlol/Springsteen!

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

dilettante white tumblrs with no real interest in or ability to organize beyond their affinity group

Mordy, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

it's not that 'we' don't want to, it is that you need actual leverage to do so

iatee, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

"Dilettante White Tumblrs" sounds like a new John Cale song

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:21 (twelve years ago)

See your doctor before trying a prescription, as studies have shown Bidenlol can have side effects in pregnant women and small children.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Monday, 19 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

Krugman re Medicare spending (but I don't think anyone in the White House will stand behind this perspective alone; and resist calls for cuts)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/opinion/life-death-and-deficits.html?_r=0

But what, ask the deficit scolds, do people like me propose doing about rising spending? The answer is to do what every other advanced country does, and make a serious effort to rein in health care costs. Give Medicare the ability to bargain over drug prices. Let the Independent Payment Advisory Board, created as part of Obamacare to help Medicare control costs, do its job instead of crying “death panels.” (And isn’t it odd that the same people who demagogue attempts to help Medicare save money are eager to throw millions of people out of the program altogether?) We know that we have a health care system with skewed incentives and bloated costs, so why don’t we try to fix it?

curmudgeon, Monday, 19 November 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

I completely forgot they once gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. How lame was that.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 November 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

yeah what was that

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Monday, 19 November 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago)

wheres my nobel peace prize thx alot OMABA

lag∞n, Monday, 19 November 2012 23:46 (twelve years ago)

nobel committee and their handouts

mh, Monday, 19 November 2012 23:57 (twelve years ago)

A regular American ponders Thanksgiving errands:

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdsdriXKzN1rtu0xao1_500.jpg

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

Ex-presidential candidates: they're just like us.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

Standing around looking vaguely dishevelled in La Jolla at an Arco.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

Some context.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

some hair gel!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, roffles to be had:

Next up was GOP strategist Steve Schmidt, who last week at a University of Delaware panel discussion said that Limbaugh’s “white, 65 plus and rural” audience is “not what the country looks like anymore” and that Limbaugh was driving a message of “total ludicrous nonsense.”

Limbaugh’s take? “Okay, so you people are all white, 65 and over, and you live in the sticks. And you are screwing up the Republican Party, because you are believing what I say. This is their explanation for having lost,” Limbaugh said.

Um...yes?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

mitt looks old all of a sudden

Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

He looks naked without bronzer.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

he = Rush?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

x-post=I thought Rush was gonna stick with his too many conservatives stayed home argument.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

he = Mitt. But Rush probably does, too.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

jesus that onion yahoo story

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

I still like Al Gore's beard

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:43 (twelve years ago)

That's what she oh never mind.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:45 (twelve years ago)

Interesting comments on this post addressing how consecutive losses moderates parties (Eisenhower, Clinton, according to the examples:

A couple of differences, however. Before the 1970s, things like Presidential nominations were largely controlled by the professionals. And professionals care far more about winning than the voters in the party primaries which now dominate the nomination process. Lose two elections, and you have the professionals' attention -- as we are already seeing.

But convincing the mass of primary voters that they have to bend on ideology in order to get to govern? That's a different story. After all, their careers are not at risk from a spell out of office, and from not having their candidates win. They may not like the election results, but their pay checks are not going to be impacted.

Also, while Clinton had to reinvent and rebrand the Democratic Party, he had a smaller job than those who hope to do the same now for the Republicans. The Democratic Party needed to be less liberal in order to win. But it was, overall, already relatively moderate. Clinton could have a "Sisten Souljah" moment, attack someone on the far left, and not lose much of the party base.

But the Republican Party today is mostly not moderately conservative; it is *very* conservative. Anyone who has the temerity to attack someone on the far right is going to lose a big chunk of the existing party base. In addition, a lot of effort has been put into demonizing anyone who dares to suggest that compromise might be necessary or desirable. So it is both a bigger and a more delicate task to move the party back towards the center.

Conclusion: the effort to moderate the party's stance may start now. But it is probably going to take losing more like 5 elections to get the job done.

The good(?) news is that, absent a massive external event, they will lose those elections..

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:51 (twelve years ago)

Democratic Party needed to be less liberal in order to win. But it was, overall, already relatively moderate.

zackly... Of course they LOOK liberal by the current model, but nowhere near the New Society/Watergate-era standard.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

presidential nominations are still 'largely controlled by the professionals.'

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

I don't think you can nec make the case that it works for both parties, b/c of the personalities/psych-makeups of their members & leaderships. I mean, you're dealing with parties that have far different levels of authoritarians and social dominators, for one thing.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

The GOP's current situation is also a little different than the historical examples he's citing. In '64, the Republicans nominated an actual, full-throated conservative. In '72, Democrats nominated an actual, full-throated liberal. In contrast, the last two times around, the GOP primary voters have eventually kowtowed to the choice of the party establishment -- but with serious complaints that the nominee wasn't a "real" conservative. So unless and until they get to nominate another full-throated, real-deal conservative -- however they define that -- they can just keep saying is that the problem is with the wishy-washy nominees, not the ideology.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

Right. Conservatism can never fail, it can only be failed.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

I'm curious at the process of how you change a group of people categorically opposed to and psychologically incapable of the self-reflection or introspection required for error-correction. Do you just have to wait til enough of the crazies die off?

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:05 (twelve years ago)

any nation has some number of people like that. you live with it. and sometimes some of them have some power. it sucks!

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

presidential nominations are still 'largely controlled by the professionals.'

Dude come on, it was a clown show, and one that did a fair amount of damage to the eventual nominee.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

the pros are part of the clown show

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

the 'professional' choice has been the guy who wound up nominated for decades -- obama in '08 is the only recent exception i can think of.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago)

GOP voters did not kowtow to the party establishment, Romney was left holding the ball after every other choice was eventually lol'd off the national stage. even after Romney 'won' Santorum was winning primaries.

anyone who thinks what happened this year was the work of 'political professionals' is crazy. the inmates run the asylum.

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago)

admittedly at this point it's hard to tell the difference with the GOP, they've got more clowns and jokers than a bob dylan song

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, the pros were clearly not in control of the primary process, even if they got a handle on things later.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago)

Eastwood.gif

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

there was absolutely no way that a guy who wasn't 'ok' to the party establishment was going to win the nomination.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

there was some way. if there were fewer way-out candidates last summer instead of a whole field, romney would have had a tougher time.

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago)

much of 'the party establishment' was attacking Romney throughout the process

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

The conflation of pros and clown show is most obviously seen in the rejection of Jon Huntsman imo

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

Competent people would not have allowed Herman Cain or Bachmann in the door, much less on the stage

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

JD, I understand that you mean "The identity of the eventual candidate" rather than "The process of choosing the eventual candidate", but if they have this invisible veto, why didn't they use it earlier?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:44 (twelve years ago)

The major filter for pre-nomination candidates consists of the fifty different sets of arcane rules for selecting delegates and the difficulty of raising money and sustaining an organization. The "party establishment" now embraces a large number of trained and effective campaign managers who are dedicated wingnuts, so the nutty wing of the party has a lot more power in the selection process, because they can navigate the rules.

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

they can't get rid of the primary process, and that results in a pretty entertaining sideshow + the illusion that primary voters are getting to 'make their voice heard,' but it was pretty clear from the start that romney was ahead of the pack and was going to get the nomination bar some unanticipated scandal (same with bush in 2000 and mccain in 2008). the odds that the party establishment was actually going to throw its weight behind herman cain or michelle bachmann were pretty low.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

larison OTM: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/romney-has-been-dreadful-but-was-he-inevitable-as-nominee-yes/

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

I'm wondering what the huge influx of money has done to influence the GOP shitshow. Clearly people like Herman Cain and Donald Trump were LOL candidates, but I get the feeling there was a tremendous market for their antics, that with them politics was a very big topic through both mainstream coverage and viral moments. Feels like plenty of money was thrown around at candidates that had no real hope of winning but added tremendous value and kept eyes glued to FOX, political bloggers, youtube remixes, etc.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

again there is a difference between romney was inevitable because the rest were such jokes and romney was inevitable because the puppet masters wanted him there. puppet masters were pushing perry into the race, very late in the game. party leaders showed vague and half-hearted support for romney *throughout the process* - even after the numbers suggested he was inevitable. it wasn't that people weren't going to throw their weight behind herman cain or michelle bachmann, it's that the weight that was thrown towards romney was so half-hearted that cain got to be on tv for a month.

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

a boring middle-aged white dude who held a massachusetts office, isn't all that enthusiastic, and seems to connect to people poorly loses a presidential race? hold the phone!

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago)

tbf I felt like Kerry and Romney were both consensus picks -- politically centrist, and it was hard to differentiate their past stances from their current platforms that are aiming at a broader electorate because their enthusiasm for the national stage just wasn't there

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:17 (twelve years ago)

history doesn't organize itself this way i know, but the parallels between romney and kerry are pretty eery

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

most democrats didn't actually hate kerry

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:23 (twelve years ago)

Most Democrats were actually bored by Kerry

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:26 (twelve years ago)

Bored by Kerry, but terrified of Bush.

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

How could anyone be bored by this dude

http://sipwithsocialites.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/John-Kerry-Wind-Surfing-539w.jpeg

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago)

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef01157066c615970c-400wi

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

Before I laugh at anyone for voting for Palin, I step back and remember that I voted for that guy as vice-president.

pplains, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

only reason I voted for Gore in 2000 was supreme court justices. still hate lieberman with a passion.

maybe that's the secret to obama's success, a vp candidate that isn't horrible

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

Mr. Unskewed Polls now alleges that voter fraud won Ohio, Florida and Virginia for Obama: http://www.barackofraudo.com/

(by "alleges" I mean "vomits all over his shirt.")

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:02 (twelve years ago)

horrible vs embarrassing

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

lol @ ofraudo

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

That's the best he can do, folks.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

that's awesome

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

Barack of Raudo

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

(that is my new Star Wars: The Old Republic character name)

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:07 (twelve years ago)

Barack Alfredo

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:09 (twelve years ago)

Darth Raudo

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

¿Tecnico o rudo?

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

I know it was you, Ofraudo. You broke my heart! You broke my heart!

da croupier, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

Black States = States Obama won by Voter Fraud. Click the state for more information.

oh, the *black* ones

mookieproof, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

That scene with the unskewed polls guy...yikes. xp

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

apparently it's O'Fraudo on the site. Short for Barack Of Fraudo, I guess.

da croupier, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

Fraudo Bauggins

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:27 (twelve years ago)

Barack of Fraudo sounds like a GRRM character.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:29 (twelve years ago)

I think Larison is hilariously off the money there, but I'm curious, JD - he sniffs at using front-runner to mean someone so gauche as to have a 10-point lead over Romney, but what do you mean by it, what made Romney a (the!) front runner, other than the fact that he won? His use of "serious" three times in four sentences seems a little desperate, like hahaha no of course we never believed that.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

Baroccofraudo was one of your Venetian sidekicks in Assassins Creed II, I think

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

he refers to Romney having been widely seen as the likely nominee in 2011, so i think he's just saying "who smart money would have been on before the primaries" xp

some dude, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

no one actually believed anyone but Mitt Romney was going to win the nomination

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:36 (twelve years ago)

well, clemenza hoped

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

I think there was a brief period before Perry actually got in that Romney seemed less inevitable. If Perry had been any kind of decent candidate, it could have been a real race.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

http://www.wagerminds.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Screen-shot-2012-04-04-at-11.18.08-PM.png

not to say that intrade is 'the smart money' but it's a decent measure of expectations

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

and yeah, perry was in a lot of ways 'the establishment choice', he just fell on his face

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

it's a really stupid argument but there's the idea of someone being "nominatable" versus "electable"

the real answer is that no one is going to get elected who can't get a nomination anyway, but if it comes down to a consensus pick no one really loves the party has no chance

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago)

rick perry was some goober from texas who spewed nonsense and campaigned for Gore in 2000

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

romneyitable

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

everything said about Rick Perry before he entered the race, particularly the "he makes W seem like a deep thinker and a genius" commentary coming from PEOPLE IN TEXAS, made it pretty clear he was going to be a disaster

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

he'd have won if it hadn't been for a bad back iirc

mookieproof, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

REP NOM ROMNEY

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

funny enough, the nationalization and internet-ization of the primary process >> increased importance of debates over local media game/baby kissing >> the rightist candidates loved by the internet activists had a higher tightrope to walk. and blew it!

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

god all those debates... great idea guys, put the ugliest and weirdest part of the party process on tv as early and often as possible

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago)

Romney did not acquire true front runner status until a fair number of other politicians publically withdrew their names from consideration and the conventional wisdom "deadline" for getting into the race (circa sept, 2011) had passed.

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:44 (twelve years ago)

^ yeah, otm

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

well, yeah, because he was the consensus that all the outliers could grudgingly claim was least objectionable

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

I think the fact that romney *was* (mostly) long-term inevitable given the other candidates, but the party took ages to close ranks and rally around him is the damning evidence here. it's not that important ppl thought cain or bachmann were feasible alternatives, it's that they knew they weren't but still weren't 100% behind romney - even after his inevitability wasn't just situational it was also in the primary wins.

iatee, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

I think there was a brief period before Perry actually got in that Romney seemed less inevitable.

Or the six-week period after Perry got in, when he was for example leading Romney 31-18 in the polls.

I mean, this is not the picture of a coronation.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

or they thought he was "electable"

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

If anything he was looks better the further back you go, because he has been running for the 2012 nomination since 2008, and has a shit-ton of cash.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:47 (twelve years ago)

according to that realclearpolitics thing, Perry peaked nearly exactly a month after announcing his candidacy. The only one that had strong gains till the end game was Santorum, mostly because the wackos flocked to him when Bachmann and Cain dropped

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:49 (twelve years ago)

I really don't think even the establishment guys fully comprehend how badly their brand has been damaged at the national level. Just because you ultimately get the moderate, 'sensible' business dude doesn't mean that the whole nation is just going to forget that he spent a year mixing it up with class A nitwits and often times LOSING. Just being on the same stage as these clowns leaves an odor imo

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:53 (twelve years ago)

xp to me - If I had to guess, Cain probably peaked about a month after the straw poll, and Gingrich picked up momentum by campaigning hard post-caucus and before primaries. Really you see a moment when each candidate had his/her moment, took off for a month, and then dropped back out.

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:54 (twelve years ago)

I wonder if Michelle Bachmann ever has a moment of clarity, and realises what it means to have never been a front-runner in a campaign that gave the yellow jersey to Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:56 (twelve years ago)

the cluelessness is evidenced by the fact that they appear to think all they have to do now is get a happy brown person to say the exact same bullshit and then everything'll be cool.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:56 (twelve years ago)

it means michelle bachmann is as crazy as a loon, imo

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:57 (twelve years ago)

Well yeah, that's what I'm saying.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

Yeah not sure why she would be more prone to a moment of clarity than any of the other inmates

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:59 (twelve years ago)

Bachmann was the very first front runner after she won the Iowa straw poll.. it was all downhill from there

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

Because they all got their moment in the sun.

xp oh yeah, that's true, I had forgotten.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

it's not that important ppl thought cain or bachmann were feasible alternatives, it's that they knew they weren't but still weren't 100% behind romney

It really was the most amazing thing, Mr. Clean standing plaintively outside on the doorstep, holding wilted flowers and melted chocolates while this parade of losers got invited in for smooches and heavy petting.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

the straw poll was a collection of the weirdest this year, imo

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

Ames Straw Poll 2011
Place Candidate Votes Percentage
1 Michele Bachmann 4,823 28.6%
2 Ron Paul 4,671 27.7%
3 Tim Pawlenty 2,293 13.6%
4 Rick Santorum 1,657 9.8%
5 Herman Cain 1,456 8.6%
6 Rick Perry (write-in) 718 4.3%
7 Mitt Romney 567 3.4%

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

BTW, since it's become an article of faith among Republicans very quickly that the precincts showing no votes for Romney means ZOMG FRAUD, I went back and checked the last election results in Cuyahoga County, OH. There were 19 precincts with 0 McCain votes, 1 precinct with 0 Obama votes, and nobody said a word about it.

super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:08 (twelve years ago)

it's amazing that an overprivileged dude who has recorded expressing nothing but contempt for poor people multiple times wasn't embraced by the entire nation, it's just such a mystery as to how he could have been off-putting or alienating

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:11 (twelve years ago)

we live in a country where everyone feels they will someday be privileged and able to vocally express their contempt for the lower class

mh, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:13 (twelve years ago)

my attitude is why wait, contempt for any and all

Hunt3r, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:14 (twelve years ago)

The democritization of contempt happened a long time back.

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 21:22 (twelve years ago)

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/did_anonymous_stop_rove_stealing_the_election/

Mordy, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 22:08 (twelve years ago)

i don't buy it

goole, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

lag∞n, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:19 (twelve years ago)

yeah that Anonymous story is such blatant bullshit.

paula boradwell (crüt), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:22 (twelve years ago)

it's amazing that an overprivileged dude who has recorded expressing nothing but contempt for poor people multiple times wasn't embraced by the entire nation, it's just such a mystery as to how he could have been off-putting or alienating

The lamestream media. Pure and simple. The media hates conservatives, so we have to fight our battles in the classrooms and city commissions.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:24 (twelve years ago)

Mr. Unskewed Polls now alleges that voter fraud won Ohio, Florida and Virginia for Obama: http://www.barackofraudo.com/

(by "alleges" I mean "vomits all over his shirt.")

― super perv powder (Phil D.), Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:02 (3 hours ago) Permalink

"post comments" links to lemonparty

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:34 (twelve years ago)

well it did, now it links to a K-pop girl group on youtube wtf

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:35 (twelve years ago)

lol you can see the blue peaking out from behind the black u r sooo sloppy unskewed guy show some self respect

lag∞n, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 23:38 (twelve years ago)

Speaking of the Iowa straw poll:

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/iowa-governor-iowa-straw-poll-outlived-its-usefulness?ref=fpb

"Branstad pointed to the failed primary run of the 2011 Ames winner Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), as an example that the poll may not be the best measure of Republican nominees."

Not sure if "may not be" comes from Branstad or the writer, but dry wit at its best.

clemenza, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 00:07 (twelve years ago)

"will the real marc rubio please stand up, please stand up"

ACTUAL CNN REPORTER SAID THIS

Mordy, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 01:00 (twelve years ago)

tbf Branstache outlived his usefulness well over a decade ago

mh, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 02:57 (twelve years ago)

Rep. Allen West Concedes

Mordy, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 04:12 (twelve years ago)

News flash for Rep. West: when you lose an election, your concession or lack of concession is irrelevant to the result. It merely indicates your ability to grasp the reality of the situation and respond graciously. You failed.

Aimless, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 05:08 (twelve years ago)

Joe Scarborough says some things about Nate Silver.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

Elsewhere, the party continues:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8PDvdcCcAA6naR.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

"I'm really enjoying this so-called...rolling coaster."

and I scream Fieri Eiffel Tower High (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

Why can't the rolling coaster cam catch Romney looking like a total jackass, like the rest of us?

Z S, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

he's always fake on camera

mh, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

What I would give for a nice shot of him with his eyes rolled back

Z S, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

think you're looking for the comeface thread

mh, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

craig seems p chill

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/romney-adviser-conservative-polling-facing-some-kind-of

lol the polls that showed us leading were wrong therefor the entire system is broke

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

Personally I'm ALL GLAD that Dan Fucking Senor is reduced to yammering about that instead of, I dunno, planning the Iran invasion as he might have been otherwise.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago)

for sure

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

You forgot the tilde.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

You can't plan invasions or yammer without your tilde.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

~

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

Every time I've seen that goof's name it's been without the tilde, thus I did not include it.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

Senor's definition of "systemic" is probably narrow enough to make him totally on the money. I doubt he'll see the irony in that.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

"I won't say who they are. They know who they are. They were on television. I mean, it was unbelievable. It was five, six days later, absolutely eviscerating him."

-- Former Romney adviser Dan Senor, quoted by CNN, saying it was "stunning" how Romney staffers "preened for administration positions when they thought Romney would win but then turned on the candidate as soon as he lost the election."

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

it was stunning

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

Pobrecito.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago)

Riding rolling coaster at Disneyland = Mormon version of five-day binge in Vegas.

pplains, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

"What happens in Tomorrowland stays in Tomorrowland."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:22 (twelve years ago)

"The understanding, the assumptions made about what the electorate looked like was way off."

Not just a problem for your pollsters, Senor Senor.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

A little addendum for your maintenance of the culture wars:

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/obama_once_gave_rubio_like_answer_on_earths_age/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:35 (twelve years ago)

divine creation and literal age of the earth aren't exaaactly the same thing. though thank mammon nobody asked obama the latter (despite the headline)

goole, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

I'm w Rubio here, what does it have to do w anything?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:09 (twelve years ago)

people who take the bible as literal truth are likely to make poor decisions w/r/t many policy issues

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

Riding rolling coaster at Disneyland = Mormon version of five-day binge in Vegas

Mormon rumspringa?

誤訳侮辱, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

on some level the age of the earth does impact the GDP/economic growth of the United States because fossil fuels etc

paula boradwell (crüt), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

i want a president who respects empirical data personally

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:15 (twelve years ago)

otoh I want a president who inserts "man" into colloquial settings.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago)

we can have both, the dream is alive

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

otoh I want a president who inserts "man" into colloquial settings.

Cheech Marin for president.

By the end of my second term, Gingrich said... (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:37 (twelve years ago)

i want a president who respects empirical data personally

What if every potential president had to comment on things like the dropping of nukes on Japan or running a country founded on the genocide of the native people? Those facts are undisputed even by the most evangelical creationist, and they have a far stronger hold on the political narrative history of the US than "When was the world created?" imo.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:41 (twelve years ago)

Rubio's personal beliefs do not matter so much as the fact that he can't do shit without the support of crazies who demand that their leader mouth certain tribal slogans or be cast out forever. It doesn't matter whether the leaders believe this shit or not usually, just that they re-affirm and reinforce the tribal borders.

In other words, remember when they leaning on Romney during the GOP debates to spout some biblical literalist shit that even a core-less and principle-less dude like he was, he wouldn't come right out and say it? whereas Perry and Santorum and Bachmann never missed a chance to fall all over themselves to spread Dominionist theocratic shit.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

obama prob isn't gonna nuke japan or give back all of america, but he might have to make some decisions w/r/t whether or not jesus will come back to save us from global warming

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

I haven't been following this thread regularly---have there been any "good" retrospectives on the Obama campaign yet? I skip the horse race while it's going on but after the fact I enjoy reading about it.

Euler, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:44 (twelve years ago)

Global warming is a huge strawman, a good way to blur what should be a question of quality of life into a somewhat abstracted projection of what may or may not happen 100 years in the future. The more we focus on "Will the world's sea levels rise in the future?" the less we focus on "Old people and young children should stay indoors today because of air quality".

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:47 (twelve years ago)

um

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:48 (twelve years ago)

Global warming is a huge strawman, a good way to blur what should be a question of quality of life into a somewhat abstracted projection of what may or may not happen 100 years in the future

great time to consider quality of life when under sixty feet of water or your children are choking on toxic fumes.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

There's nothing abstract about what happened in NY/NJ last month.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago)

the line between things that are in the ocean and things that are not in the ocean became somewhat abstracted

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

littorally true

goole, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago)

wonder if Crate & Barrel will be open when Madagascar goes under.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago)

You guys are right, forget about air and water quality suffering due to chemical pollutants, we should focus on the most polarized version of the environmental argument possible. That is certain to win the other side over.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

those polarized ice caps are kinda related to your concerns

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:07 (twelve years ago)

Global warming is a huge strawman, a good way to blur what should be a question of quality of life into a somewhat abstracted projection of what may or may not happen 100 years in the future. The more we focus on "Will the world's sea levels rise in the future?" the less we focus on "Old people and young children should stay indoors today because of air quality".

Sea level rise, droughts and all the other long term "abstracted projections" will pose a greater threat to humanity than air quality, which is why people focus on them more.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:07 (twelve years ago)

can you guys just stop being so damn polarizing

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

the 2012 drought is expected to cut America’s GDP by 0.5–1 percentage points, said Deutsche Bank Securities this week. …

DIDN'T HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE

http://www.thenation.com/blog/171305/my-son-age-25-has-never-been-around-cooler-average-month

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

My Son, Age 25, Has Never Been Around for a Cooler-Than-Average Month

this is a little ambiguous

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

didnt know u were a dad iatee congrats

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:14 (twelve years ago)

the world stopped being cool when I became a dad

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:22 (twelve years ago)

a lot of people feel that way

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:23 (twelve years ago)

in retrospect I should have waited until I was at least a 2 y/o to become a dad

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

live a lil

lag∞n, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:25 (twelve years ago)

hoping for an iatee/icey podcast someday

Fieri-brand sausages into my and your ready holes (silby), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:28 (twelve years ago)

So Jesse Jackson Jr. ... does he appoint a replacement?

Not that it matters. This is why I hope Obama doesn't appoint Kerry to something, thus opening up his seat and more or less inviting the return Scott Brown. Though it wouldn't be as big of a boner as grabbing Janet Napolitano and giving us Jan Brewer.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:36 (twelve years ago)

the worst was kathleen sebelius, why would you sacrifice a popular kansas democrat

iatee, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

"For the first time in our history, the winners of the White House turkey pardon were chosen through a highly competitive online vote. And once again, Nate Silver completely nailed it," Obama said. "The guy's amazing. He predicted these guys would win."

carne asada, Wednesday, 21 November 2012 20:47 (twelve years ago)

Can't imagine a Romney administration that would have encouraged Egypt's role in negotiating the cease fire so much (or at all). Stuff like this matters A LOT.

timellison, Thursday, 22 November 2012 00:39 (twelve years ago)

we can stop worrying about Romney guys

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 November 2012 00:41 (twelve years ago)

Just sayin

timellison, Thursday, 22 November 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

altho I guess there is a hypothetical Romney admin thread isn't there? PARALLEL UNIVERSES

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 November 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

Is Romney running for president this year?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 November 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago)

Mitt Romney is always at any given time in history running for president, even before and after his lifespan.

thraeds of life (The Reverend), Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:04 (twelve years ago)

Mitt Romney:
A Life Just The Right Span
by: Mitt Romney

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:12 (twelve years ago)

http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/romney-pumping-gas.jpg

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:14 (twelve years ago)

He's looking a little bit Nick Nolte mugshot

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:23 (twelve years ago)

A friend posted this on Facebook tonight, and I realized it was a précis of the entire election:

Romney: "Doctorin' jobs and lawyerin' jobs--jobs for me and you!"
Obama: "Roads and everything...all kinds of roads!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPFAAGC0Jxo

clemenza, Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago)

EMI, which owns copyright content from that video, has blocked it in my country, here at this, my desk, and on this screen connected to my computer, as I live and breathe. EMI only does this out of its solicitude for its intellectual property, which may be harmed, should I watch that video.

Aimless, Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:32 (twelve years ago)

Wow--they must be really protective of the Stompin' Tom catalogue.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 November 2012 01:39 (twelve years ago)

sorry to burst your bubble, but i'm pretty sure that gas station photo is actually john mcafee

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 22 November 2012 02:11 (twelve years ago)

I wonder if you're a grown man who has been wearing make-up every day for a year or so if you go through withdrawal when you stop wearing make-up or if you just say, screw it, I'm wearing make-up.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 November 2012 02:22 (twelve years ago)

Are they serious about this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/jim_messina_huntsman_was_obamas_biggest_threat/

Maybe Huntsman was a good candidate on paper, but from everything I saw of him in interviews and in the debates, he was awful.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 November 2012 05:57 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, his real problem wasn't that he was too moderate but that he's extremely uncharismatic.

thraeds of life (The Reverend), Thursday, 22 November 2012 06:59 (twelve years ago)

Pareene assembles a holiday guide to arguing with batshit relatives.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 November 2012 13:13 (twelve years ago)

"Are they serious about this?"

I think they are trolling.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Thursday, 22 November 2012 14:15 (twelve years ago)

If you actually want to engage your right-wing relatives — and let me be clear, you really should not do this, you are going to ruin Thanksgiving

Haaa. Still, why would one want to voluntarily argue this shit other than an urge to argue? Attacking any belief head-on doesn't do shit but re-cement it. Facts will backfire against folks sheltered against them for years.

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 22 November 2012 14:38 (twelve years ago)

In my experience, we don't argue anything -- it's our relatives who are belligerent.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 November 2012 14:42 (twelve years ago)

Yeah there are just those certain uncles who stalk around saying crazy shit until you can't resist speaking up

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 22 November 2012 14:50 (twelve years ago)

I have a shit-starting Aunt who one-gathering, apropos of nothing during a lull, grumble-blurted out "well, I don't know about you, but I don't know ANYONE who doesn't have health insurance." After explaining to her that yes, we know plenty of people without health insurance and that not only that, we know people with little babies completely screwed because of the pre-existing condition nonsense (this was a couple of years ago), and mothers forced to drive 90 minutes each way almost every day to get treatment for their daughter from an approved physician, I asked her:

"Do you know anyone from India?"

"No."

"Do you know anyone from China?"

"No."

"Well, that's over two billion people right there, a third of the world's population. You don't know them, have never met them, will never meet them, and yet they exist."

"Well..."

End of conversation.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 22 November 2012 15:02 (twelve years ago)

Happy to report that Romney's FB page continues to hemmorage likes

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 22 November 2012 19:38 (twelve years ago)

Romney's likes-graph: more and more each day, it's just the right height.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 November 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago)

Jeb Bush said to be considering 2016 run

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Friday, 23 November 2012 16:24 (twelve years ago)

I'm strongly considering voting for whoever runs against him.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

I think Jesse Jackson Jr. is in a strong position to begin laying the groundwork.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 November 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

Textbook "we just boned" photo

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/mitt-romney-ann-thanksgiving-facebook-photo.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 23 November 2012 18:51 (twelve years ago)

lol gross

flopson, Friday, 23 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

glad they cropped out the puddle on the floor

Z S, Friday, 23 November 2012 18:58 (twelve years ago)

ack, thanks ZS, nightmares now

mh, Friday, 23 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

Picture the heel of an ilxor, grinding on the face of Mitt Romney. Forever. Or until the ilxor gets distracted by a thread about pets or food.

Aimless, Friday, 23 November 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

IMO it's a pretty charming photo

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 23 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

otm
i never know what to do with that

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Friday, 23 November 2012 19:47 (twelve years ago)

In deciding what to make of such a photo, it helps to know who posted it, where and when. This may help to clarify their motives.

Romney has just finished a prolonged attempt to persuade American voters to grant him extraordinary power over the entire planet and the release of that charming photo has a high probability of being part of that campaign, or an extension of it. The desire for power is very calculating.

Aimless, Friday, 23 November 2012 20:11 (twelve years ago)

I dunno, looks like it's straight from Presidential Cumlords 4 to me

Z S, Friday, 23 November 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

I can't deal with Mitt's sex hair in that picture.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Friday, 23 November 2012 20:57 (twelve years ago)

Guys Mitt looks like he's about to croak in that pic

Raymond Cummings, Friday, 23 November 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

wishful thinking

Aimless, Friday, 23 November 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

still with the fucking Mitt, you maniacs

my relatives voted for Obomber and still laughed at my turkey-shoot-with-drones joke

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 November 2012 22:10 (twelve years ago)

maybe it was funny

"Hahahaha, nice one, Punchy," I said. (stevie), Friday, 23 November 2012 23:12 (twelve years ago)

Leave Mitt Alone

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 23 November 2012 23:23 (twelve years ago)

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQD-KQL5NSS0Oze5Hp8DFUeDdD6SWkK49VMfcG4ksTCD-gQ4ybI

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 November 2012 00:15 (twelve years ago)

so, 37 state guvmints dominated by one party, most since 1952.

The blank gap in this graph representing the NY legislative clusterfuck reminds me of that laugh line from the 1776 musical: "WHAT IN HELL GOES ON IN NEW YORK?"

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/11/23/us/state-government-control-since-1938.html

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 24 November 2012 03:56 (twelve years ago)

This is a hopeful sign:

Has Grover Norquist And His Anti-Tax Pledge Reached The End Of The Road? (Forbes)

Yet another prominent Republican has added his name to the list of those for whom the allure of the Grover Norquist “Taxpayer Protection Pledge” has lost its luster.

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) has announced that he will no longer honor his commitment to the Norquist pledge wherein he promised not to raise taxes under any circumstances whatsoever. Appearing on a local Georgia television program, Chambliss said, “I care more about my country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge. If we do it his way then we’ll continue in debt, and I just have a disagreement with him about that.”

Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku), Saturday, 24 November 2012 17:47 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/patty-murray-will-be-key-voice-in-senate-on-budget-deal/2012/11/23/d02a5a02-300d-11e2-a30e-5ca76eeec857_story.html

In a town consumed by talk of the apocalyptic consequences of failing to resolve the budgeting crisis, Murray has been arguing that missing the deadline for a deal — going over the cliff — could actually make getting a deal easier.

I hope she is listened to, but I'm not counting on it.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 25 November 2012 04:15 (twelve years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/25/world/white-house-presses-for-drone-rule-book.html

“There was concern that the levers might no longer be in our hands,” said one official, speaking on condition of anonymity. With a continuing debate about the proper limits of drone strikes, Mr. Obama did not want to leave an “amorphous” program to his successor, the official said. The effort, which would have been rushed to completion by January had Mr. Romney won, will now be finished at a more leisurely pace, the official said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/leicester/content/images/2006/10/19/dmu_head_in_hands_315x420.jpg

Shuja Nawaz, a Pakistan-born analyst now at the Atlantic Council in Washington, said the United States should start making public a detailed account of the results of each strike, including any collateral deaths, in part to counter propaganda from jihadist groups. “This is a grand opportunity for the Obama administration to take the drones out of the shadows and to be open about their objectives,” he said.

But the administration appears to be a long way from embracing such openness. The draft rule book for drone strikes that has been passed among agencies over the last several months is so highly classified, officials said, that it is hand-carried from office to office rather than sent by e-mail.

lol, Open Government Initiative:

"My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government." - Barack Obama, 1/21/2009

Z S, Sunday, 25 November 2012 06:21 (twelve years ago)

they should get a lil in-house drone to zip around delivering the rulebook usb between offices

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Sunday, 25 November 2012 06:44 (twelve years ago)

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/11/09/is-this-child-dead-enough-for-you/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 25 November 2012 07:04 (twelve years ago)

classy

Gukbe, Sunday, 25 November 2012 07:19 (twelve years ago)

Do they chatter and prattle like funny little birds as you eat with them at the family table?

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 25 November 2012 07:20 (twelve years ago)

that article is so embarrassing

Gukbe, Sunday, 25 November 2012 07:27 (twelve years ago)

dead kids aren't a guy fieri restaurant

Gukbe, Sunday, 25 November 2012 07:27 (twelve years ago)

Democrats are so embarrassing

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 25 November 2012 13:41 (twelve years ago)

ZS otm

kinda sucks that good, right-thinking people are so resigned to this shit that you have to talk real nice about how it sucks or you get clowned

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 25 November 2012 14:37 (twelve years ago)

Maybe too much emphasis on how good, right-thinking clowns suck imo

Hunt3r, Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

holy christ Ruth Marcus and Peggy Noonan are two of the dumbest clucks breathing oxygen.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

I don't know, a stark line about how this is a dead child, killed by a drone strike that was supposedly precise, and that such deaths equal the number of "precise" kills might be just as useful.

After a hundred words about PRECISE DRONES in a sarcastic manner and CHILDREN, I kind of tune out.

tbh I would rather a Taliban soldier kill the child, rather than a republican or a democrat, because drone strikes are bad. Is that what I should say?

mh, Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

Not 100% sure 'precise' makes it any better. For one thing intelligence could be way off. For another thing end all these wars. The number of Americans killed by slipping in the bathtub is far greater than those killed by terrorists.

That a child died is horrible. But this is war, and war is horrible, and there is no way to fight a 'precise' or 'smart' or 'morally clean' war.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 25 November 2012 16:04 (twelve years ago)

I feel sad when adults die, too, but I guess children are cuter and probably haven't had the opportunity to make decisions I'd dislike

mh, Sunday, 25 November 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

There are ways to fight legal wars. This is not one of them. Xp

Go Narine, Go! (ShariVari), Sunday, 25 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

mh: "everything that happens sad, but what the hell, nothing anybody can do about it so shut up" - is this an accurate representation of your position re: drone strike y/n

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 25 November 2012 16:51 (twelve years ago)

Not at all! I think that concentrating on the sad and emotive is a tactic, but not one I think goes anywhere with politicians, only with populaces. We need the populace to put pressure, but if you could say "each civilian killed as supposed collateral damage, on average, is going to incite two more retaliatory strikes. This is not an effective way of removing the leadership from the equation, it is a way of creating more revenge strikes that are wild, unpredictable, and headless without any hierarchical leadership"

I don't have facts there, but there could be facts! If people think that there are casualties in the quest for a good, they are willing to write them off. Remove the perception that this is in search of a goal. It's not, the goal is to stop violence with concentrated violence.

I'm not saying that children aren't good, but quite the opposite -- all life is important, and even if you disagree with a militant person or find their views abhorrent, they are still people and there's the hope that you can reconcile views somehow, not just kill them.

mh, Sunday, 25 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

As long as someone thinks killing is an essential part of the solution, not just something regrettable that happens while working on a real solution, there's going to be a communicative disconnect. To be fair, there are people on the ground, protecting afghanis, bringing food and materials, talking to kids, and living in and around these communities. I've met some -- they're still soldiers, though, and soldiers bring guns and bombs and everything else. Not really supportive of a cultural change away from guns and between-group warfare.

mh, Sunday, 25 November 2012 17:45 (twelve years ago)

It's difficult to put together a reasoned counter-argument to the use of drones when the arguments for their use are not carried out in the public sphere. It's impossible to point to lack of effect or increased retaliatory strikes when they are being used in a country (Pakistan) where US troops have never been under fire. Their purpose isn't clear so there are no measurable outcomes other than dead Pakistanis. Under the circumstances, leading with the argument that it is illegal, immoral and killing innocent women and children seems like it has more legs.

Go Narine, Go! (ShariVari), Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

Arguments can be made for the killing of terrorists.

Gukbe, Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago)

I'm more of a due process of law person myself, but then you have to go in and get them so you can try them, and that line of thinking is how we got to this point to begin with

mh, Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:09 (twelve years ago)

Yes the only long-term thing we are really accomplishing is that we'll be back over there in 20 years fighting a generation of people whose parents, friends, and neighbors have been 'collateral damage'. Perpetual war is pretty much where this path is taking us.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:09 (twelve years ago)

We should elect this guy: http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/11/25/obama-in-2004-were-not-fighting-terrorists-were-fighting-people-who-engage-in-terrorism/

Gukbe, Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago)

prefer they be over here; more direct involvement clarifies American thinking.

xp

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 25 November 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago)

I certainly understand the impulse behind that counterpunch piece and similar attempts to reassert the victim of war as a way of challenging the validity of violence. It attempts to realign the political along the personal, and I think it can be a very radical act by short circuiting the normal discussions of statecraft, politics, ideology, etc and revealing the human individual who is impacted. (I think that Sari Nusseibeh exposes the philosophical undergirding of this move in "What Is a Palestinian State Worth?" when he talks about how causes/national identities/religious identities colonize the personal body - this tries to re-extract that body.) But I think that it can also become numbing through overuse, and I think Floyd actually recognizes that. "Is This Child Dead Enough for You?" seems almost desperately trying to annul these other constructs, maybe impatient or furious that they haven't dissipated themselves. "Is he dead enough for you," asks, is he dead enough that his very death challenges your tacit approval of this war. But I think really radical pieces draw on a more intimate relationship to the dead.

I was reading Yang Jisheng's Tombstone and it is such a personal account of a horrible tragedy. He doesn't just throw up a dead picture and accuse you of not being infuriated. He talks movingly about his father and his father's death and then he uses numerous sources to give a broad and deep context to what caused his father's death. It is quietly polemical, and potent in its understated-ness. I don't see that in Floyd's piece, and I guess you could argue that 'nuance' hasn't helped anyone yet and it is time to get vulgar. But I suspect that Floyd isn't going to convince anyone, and I think that's why Morbz posted it. It's uncompromising in a way that complements of the outrage of the author. I just felt manipulated by it.

Mordy, Monday, 26 November 2012 03:25 (twelve years ago)

Not to mention that if you want to return dignity to an overlooked victim of a war, posting a picture of their dead body and then using them to shame your readers for who they voted for in the last presidential election only exposes how little empathy is actually present.

Mordy, Monday, 26 November 2012 03:45 (twelve years ago)

The fact that it plays up to the right wing fantasy of liberal hippies in the 60s shouting "BABY KILLER" to returning troops doesn't help.

Contrast it with the first segment from Saturday's BBC From Our Own Correspondent, about the death of the child of on of the BBC employees in Gaza.

Gukbe, Monday, 26 November 2012 04:37 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/QDBg5.png

(*・_・)ノ⌒ ☆ (Je55e), Monday, 26 November 2012 07:40 (twelve years ago)

That fetus could be none more dead.

pplains, Monday, 26 November 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

Those who have not yet read the New Yorker piece about the Iraq vet crippled with guilt at killing a number of innocent civilians, including a baby, in the heat of battle, who many years later tracks down the surviving family members would be well served. It's a great, not at all manipulative piece on the moral complexities of war, killing and forgiveness.

Me, I'm pretty torn about the drone stuff. But - and this is maybe a unique example but an illustrative one - I totally believe Bin Laden should have been killed by any means necessary, yet if that process had played out in public and not under cover of top secret black op or whatever, he likely would have been tipped off and escaped. The issue with the drones, or at least one issue, is that the government in Pakistan is not currently a reliable, cooperative partner, and in fact is likely counter-productive in the pursuit of bad guys, many of whom are concentrated in radical semi-autonomous regions. Unless, of course, Pakistan is and has been cooperative and complicit in this stuff, only secretly. Which is where we enter the muddy world of politics. If the US made public its goal in the region beyond a generic "killing terrorists" - assuming they have one - then Pakistan would have a specific goal to oppose/counteract. By keeping things secret, all parties are free to pursue whatever policies they are pursuing. Again, assuming there is a concrete goal we don't know about it. It's more than a bit of a muddle, dead babies or no, especially when the "bad guys" in this case traditionally have no problem targeting women and children themselves.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

The government of Pakistan is highly unlikely to be in a position to assist anyone the US is targeting, and it's not clear why they would particularly want to. Sections of the army, perhaps, but that wouldn't prevent the US from giving information on the strikes after they had happened - as they did in Sudan in the Clinton era. The primary barriers would probably be the illegality of the actions and the additional public scrutiny that information would be subject to.

Knowing what we do about the use of intelligence to round up people for Guantanamo Bay, many of whom were later acknowledged to either be innocent or completely peripheral figures, it's alarming how much faith is being placed in the CIA to target the right people.

Go Narine, Go! (ShariVari), Monday, 26 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

That was the legacy of Petraeus, I guess.

I think you're reducing the complexity of the Pakistani government's situation though.

Gukbe, Monday, 26 November 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/oct/25/bin-laden-dead-or-alive/?pagination=false

Klaidman describes a telling example, little examined, that occurred at the same time as the Obama administration planned for Abbottabad. On April 19, 2011, Navy SEALs boarded a fishing boat in the Gulf of Aden and arrested Ahmed Abdulkadir Warsame, a British-educated, alleged liaison between the al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen and al-Shabab, the militant group in Somalia. Warsame was an alleged gunrunner who knew about transnational terrorism plots; he was also “the first significant terrorist captured overseas since Obama had become president,” as Klaidman reports.

The SEALs transferred Warsame to the USS Boxer, which had been “outfitted as a kind of floating prison.” For the next two months—before and after the Abbottabad raid—the White House held “no less than a dozen secret principals or deputies meetings to resolve the case.”

They could not decide what to do with Warsame, however. If they put him on trial in federal court in New York, they would invite a repeat of the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed debacle, on the cusp of an election year. Yet if they put Warsame on trial before a military commission in a navy brig or at Guantánamo, they would signal to “the left and civil libertarians that the administration had given up on its commitment to using civilian courts to enforce the laws against terrorists…. It was no accident that Warsame was Obama’s only major capture,” Klaidman concludes, because the prolonged stalemate about what to do with him proved the rule that killing terrorist suspects was much easier than shouldering the political risks of putting them on trial.

flopson, Monday, 26 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed debacle = tried him in ny court, got blasted by republicans and then tried him in guantanamo

flopson, Monday, 26 November 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/11/25/papa-johns-about-face/

Mordy, Monday, 26 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

The pizza is still shit, and so is the CEO.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

I have been boycotting Papa Johns before I knew anything about the politics of the CEO because their pizza is the worst.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Monday, 26 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

yup

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

Of the three big chains it offers by far the most edible pie but, no, they're not getting my business anytime soon

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

Domino's is way more edible that Papa John's (or, sadly, Pizza Hut)

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago)

Best of the bad lot, plus a bin of melted butter. Barf.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago)

You need health insurance if you're going to eat any of that shit.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:03 (twelve years ago)

Bruce Bartlett unloads:

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/revenge-of-the-reality-based-community/

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:37 (twelve years ago)

DJP otm in re: Domino's makes a marginally better pie than Papa John's. There is pretty much no excuse to eat at any of these places unless you are a vegetarian who happens to be in Louisiana, in which case chain pizza joints, sadly, are your friend.

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:45 (twelve years ago)

Y'all crazy, Pizza Hut stomps all over those other ones, with the faintest praise I can give

Nhex, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

My ranking: Domino's>Pizza Hut>Papa John's. Papa John's sauce is way too sweet for my liking, and I like Domino's crust better.

(*・_・)ノ⌒ ☆ (Je55e), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

The last two times I hate PH I threw up – a basic thin-crust pepperoni.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago)

why is it that every article I've ever noticed on TAC follows the pattern "I'm a conservative and I despise Republicans"?

I was a long time Pizza Hut fanatic but I've reduced my overall salt intake to the point where I now find their pizza to be completely inedible ;_; however it is still better than Papa John's

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago)

A PJ opened a block from my house and they seem to be doing a decent business, which just makes no sense at all considering the tons of varieties of delicious local pizza you can get around here. It's ~CHICAGO~ FFS. We have many good pizzas. Fucking Obama.

(*・_・)ノ⌒ ☆ (Je55e), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

It's possible that Domino's has improved since it changed its recipe. It used to taste like damp chalk.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

ftr Pizzaria Uno > all three of these places

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

why is it that every article I've ever noticed on TAC follows the pattern "I'm a conservative and I despise Republicans"?

Because it's their raison d'etre.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

why is it that every article I've ever noticed on TAC follows the pattern "I'm a conservative and I despise Republicans"?

If I were a conservative Bartlett and Larison's avoidance of raising arguments on how to improve conservatism would annoy the hell outta me.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

also: Bartlett was a Pearl Harbor truther???

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

I had a Dominos deep dish last month and thought it was pretty good.

Gukbe, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

also: Bartlett was a Pearl Harbor truther???

The things you learn!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

haha credit to mad men for reminding me that plenty of people always hated FDR. of all the things neoconservatism obscures...

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago)

FDR aka THAT MAN

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

if you think krugman-2012 is right on basically everything there really is no way you can call yourself a conservative

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

based on krugman's musical taste i'm roger taney

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:05 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the punditocracy:

Sure, he did end up resigning last month from the presidency of the King's College, an evangelical Christian institution, following an uproar over his attending a conference with a woman other than his wife. Yes, he is in the process of divorcing his wife of 21 years.

His life cannot have been made easier by lawsuits that have been brought against him by business associates who claim that he has cheated them, a charge he denies. And clearly, his crusade to deny President Barack Obama a second term did not produce its desired result.

But, all in all, Mr. D'Souza, 52, sounds pleased with the state of things. His career, he says, "has never been stronger."

Which is great because he's at last honest that it was all about him first and foremost.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

At this point, I lost every last friend I had on the right. Some have been known to pass me in silence at the supermarket or even to cross the street when they see me coming. People who were as close to me as brothers and sisters have disowned me.

srsly I can't fathom the pathology of human beings who do this sort of thing.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

tbh I have done this to ppl over political issues, but it has largely been because they have been saying incredibly racist things under the guise of "being political"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:08 (twelve years ago)

condemning racists to one side of the street = 21C racism

absurdly pro-D (schlump), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:10 (twelve years ago)

Hah, i would consider it a blessing. Good riddance.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago)

http://www.21cmuseumhotels.com/

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:17 (twelve years ago)

21 C racist hotels?

Oh, wait, I get it: 21C is 21st century. Kids today ...

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:18 (twelve years ago)

if you saw K-Lo walking out of a Sizzler on one side of the street would you avoid her

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

Would or could?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

Sadly, Mr. Creosote comes to mind.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:23 (twelve years ago)

Bartlett's tone is so plaintive. How I Was Wrong About All Sorts of Things, Lost All My Friends, and Wrote a Bunch of Mistimed Books That Nobody Read.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago)

haha yeah I love how each one of his books is so poorly timed

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago)

'then, my next book 'America is Safe from Terrorism' was released in August 2011'

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

2001

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

It seems pretty reasonable and then he's like "then I wrote a book about democratic racism before the civil rights act."

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

"I was chagrined to learn that Terry Schiavo: Wanted Dead or Alive was set for publication in the fall of 2005."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

republicans' biggest sin is refusing to listen to him ~sigh~

mookieproof, Monday, 26 November 2012 18:57 (twelve years ago)

lol

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

yeah dude's divide and conquer approach to courting minority votes for the gop was pretty wack

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 26 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

also: Bartlett was a Pearl Harbor truther???

tbh i kind of assume everyone who writes for TAC is one, i'm more shocked that he indicated that he isn't one anymore.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

yeah the funny thing is that is 100% as cynical as stuff the evil republicans he can't stand do today. "racism is the secret heart of the democratic party, I have evidence, look at all these southern democrats 90 years ago"

xps

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

like that's glenn beck level

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

lol @ fox news pulling someone off the air as soon as they question the network's viewpoint

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

Topic A: Papa John's "The Works" > Domino's thin crust pepperoni pizza > a slab of cardboard a homeless guy's been sleeping on for a solid month in the heat of summer > anything from Pizza Hut

Topic B: The American Conservative basically exists to troll the Republican Party; I read it all the time, it's hilarious.

誤訳侮辱, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago)

Pat Buchanan is one of the most entertaining people allowed to comment on politics on the national stage, and TAC falls in his camp

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago)

tbh i kind of assume everyone who writes for TAC is one

that's the amazing/creepy thing about all these guys: they sound so calmly righteous when talking about current GOP, but when they talk about their own shit it turns your hair white

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

TAC is buchanan's magazine!

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

well yeah, it is literally his camp

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

so its entire raison d'etre is "you guys didn't rally behind Buchanan when you had the chance, ergo we will take every opportunity available to point out how much you suck"?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

It's possible that Domino's has improved since it changed its recipe. It used to taste like damp chalk.

The crust is better but the vegetables taste all wrong. Papa John's is better. Haven't had Pizza Hut in 15 years.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

haha wow i've been a big Bartlett booster for years now. i was completely unaware that he doesn't "understand" that those terrible racist democrats are all either dead or defected to the GOP. and wrote a fucking book about it. what a doofus.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:32 (twelve years ago)

I had Dominos some time in the past year or so, it wasn't terrible. Pizza Hut I haven't ate at in at least 10 years -- I was there for someone's birthday party and there were flies buzzing around in the mozzarella cheese shakers. Never again.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

This whole long discussion about the merits of the big pizza chains contains vast quantities of information regarding our feelings about the 'fiscal cliff', imo.

Aimless, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago)

Pizza Hut i havent eaten in 10 years or so before last week. Honestly, it was pretty good, greasy, take-out pizza, better than i remember Papa being.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago)

I would eat a million Little Ceasars pizzas before willingly eating a Papa John's pizza

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

jesus, Dan.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

there's a reason why LC's charges $5 a pie: they ladle Ragu on a piece of cardboard, hurl deli pepperonis and mozzarella cheese, and throw it in the microwave.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:43 (twelve years ago)

Pope Dan, iirc

Aimless, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

(not that there is no such thing as a racist Democrat, just that Bartlett seems to be willfully ignoring party evolution here)

xposts to self

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:44 (twelve years ago)

I was Jesus Dan for a while, too

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

Bartlett supported Goldwater in '64. There's no way an intelligent person like he to not know Goldwater's position on civil rights unless he didn't give a shit and willfully elided it from his beliefs.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

Well, yeah.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

LC was awesome because they were among the first pizza places that you could order online.

Jeff, Monday, 26 November 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

domino's is the worst, but i don't think i've ever had pizza from a local place -- no matter how awful and unpromising it looked on the outside -- that wasn't better than any of the above-mentioned chains.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:50 (twelve years ago)

come to Boston/Cambridge, I will introduce to the culinary horror show that is PIZZA RING

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

I have no interest in your sexual practices.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

okay ow

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 26 November 2012 19:52 (twelve years ago)

Believe Johnny Cash wrote "Ring of Fire" about a toilet, after eating a bunch of Papa Johns. Or Pizza Hut. Or maybe Dominos? It all looks the same coming out the other end.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

(sorry)

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:05 (twelve years ago)

i'm thinking it might have been Krystal's

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:07 (twelve years ago)

anybody who didn't watch this clip missed out, this shit is hilarious

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/guest-on-fox-news-to-discuss-benghazi-attack-is-given-a-quick-exit/

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:10 (twelve years ago)

Who cares about civilian contractors they're paid to be in risky situations, unlike the ambassador and staff in friggin libya who were sitting next door to what they knew was a cia office embedded in their consulate. those people had no idea they were in a risky situation.

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

Yes, we did want to prevent blacks from voting in Florida.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

I think anyone in Libya, period, knows they're in a "risky situation."

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

lol i'm way surprised tom ricks was on fox to begin with

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

alfred's link is amazing. prominent florida republicans frankly confessing to concious voter suppression in order to win elections. that shit should be front page everywhere asap. kudos palm beach post!

Aimless, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago)

meanwhile the front page of that paper is "man who died eating roaches choked to death"

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

Was this at pizza hut?

this will surprise many (Nicole), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

xp aside:

Robert Stinnett's book Day of Deceit has some pretty compelling FOIA disclosures that many in the FDR administration favored the provocations of the McCollum memo, that FDR saw an attack by Japan as the only way to fully enter the fray against Hitler, and that FDR was well aware of signal intelligence of immanent Japanese attack. Stinnett himself approved of the provocations and deception as a means to an end, and I think he's right. Hand-wringers may resent FDR for the loss of life at Pearl Harbor, but it absolutely beats of the alternative history of Nazis unchallenged on the European continent.

Bartlett's thesis probably came at it from the foolish "Democratic Wars" viewpoint, but there's a very dramatic difference between those studying the runup to U.S. entry in WWII and 9/11 truthers or birthers: the evidence for the first from countless memos and signal intercepts is now declassified and there for all to see.

Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku), Monday, 26 November 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago)

Pearl Harbor was an extremely bold and audacious attack and there's no evidence that Roosevelt had any idea that Japan was considering it. Thinking that Japan would eventually attack is reasonable; FDR knowing that they would attack PH in the form they did and doing nothing about it is a baseless conspiracy theory afaik.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 26 November 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

tbf he was getting "JAPAN ATTACK ON US IMMINENT" memos, but assumed that war would be declared first and had no idea what the target would be. it's pretty well-documented that the declaration of war was supposed to be delivered but it was botched.

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

The provocations to war certainly were real enough. But I agree that the attack on Pearl Harbor was not specifically seen as the initial target. The Phillipines were probably the consensus most-likely target among the military planners.

Aimless, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2012/11/26/27873/fnc-hn-20121126-ricksfoxbenghazi

Love Tom Ricks.

Deafening silence (DL), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:18 (twelve years ago)

well, that's three times we've linked that

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

Oops, sorry. Only just saw it on Twitter and there was no date on it so thought it was new.

Deafening silence (DL), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

It is! I mean we've linked it three times... today. It's what that nytimes article is about.

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:34 (twelve years ago)

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/mortgage-interest-deduction-once-a-sacred-cow-is-seen-as-vulnerable/?hp

please jesus let this happen

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:35 (twelve years ago)

I kept grumbling during the election season when people were claiming there are no incentives given to the middle class while the lower class supposedly gets "handouts." Right, like tax deductions for having kids and the mortgage interest deduction aren't lifestyle incentives.

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:36 (twelve years ago)

xp Oh yeah, so it is. I was scrolling down the recent entries too quickly and it just seemed like it was all about pizza. In fact it's all about pizza and Ricks.

Deafening silence (DL), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:37 (twelve years ago)

tax deductions for having kids

doesn't this benefit people from a wide range of income brackets? poor ppl have kids too!

Mordy, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:38 (twelve years ago)

Yes? I didn't say it didn't, only that people were trying to claim they got no breaks.

mh, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:40 (twelve years ago)

ftr I read Day of Deceit at Gore Vidal's recommendation and while it's far from hysterical and presents the most credible argument we're likely to read, it still asks us to believe that FDR, a former assistant secretary of the Navy whose only feel for visual art was when it was paintings of frigates and schooners and battleships, would have deliberately let a fleet get destroyed for the sake of a war that was going to happen anyway.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:53 (twelve years ago)

whoa whoa hold the phone

from that bartlett piece:

So I wrote Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past. Unfortunately, it was published the day Barack Obama won the Iowa caucuses. But I still held out hope that Hillary Clinton, who was pandering to the white working class in unsubtle racial terms, would capture the Democratic nomination. The anger among blacks at having the nomination effectively stolen from Obama would make them highly receptive to GOP outreach, I believed. I even met with John McCain’s staff about this.

crazy bombshell!!!

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 21:55 (twelve years ago)

when it didn't work he got on the phone with FDR's staff and warned him. He was ignored.

Two days later the bombs started falling.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 21:57 (twelve years ago)

no doubt goole

nuts spats (Austerity Ponies), Monday, 26 November 2012 22:06 (twelve years ago)

probably the best thread for this

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/betting-site-intrade-shutting-down-for-us-customers

wtf

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 22:31 (twelve years ago)

tbh the right-wing beef with pearl harbor seems like it's less 'FDR got us into war' and more 'c'mon, it's FDR, everything he did is evil by definition.'

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 26 November 2012 22:33 (twelve years ago)

weeell that's the old-right take on him, mostly forgotten in the modern GOP, kept "alive" by your TAC types! neoconservatives liked FDR for being a war-winner.

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago)

i mean, yes, conservatism as a whole has never like FDR domestic economic tinkering. but during the bush years his stock was pretty high on the right. i mean, who defends the internment camps in the present day?

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 22:38 (twelve years ago)

Did even the right defend interment camps in the 2000's? What I remember is resurrection of the SCOTUS decisions ruling on their constitutionality (a niggling point, I know).

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 November 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago)

Intrade, a website dedicated to online trades and bets, announced on Monday that it would no longer allow U.S. customers to participate in its exchange. The announcement comes following a lawsuit filed earlier today by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates the trading of futures contracts. The agency took issue with the fact that Intrade offered trading to U.S. customers on the future prices of commodities such as gold and crude oil, despite a previous agreement not to do so.

intrade basically throwing a tantrum here

iatee, Monday, 26 November 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago)

i was sort of asking a rhetorical question:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Defense_of_Internment

goole, Monday, 26 November 2012 22:41 (twelve years ago)

I always forget it was Malkin who wrote that and assume it was Coulter

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 26 November 2012 23:26 (twelve years ago)

Scanned today's posts and can't see anything about this--maybe I missed it.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/supreme-court-revives-liberty-lawsuit-obamacare.php?ref=fpa

Pathetic.

clemenza, Monday, 26 November 2012 23:40 (twelve years ago)

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald
There are some rules already in place for Obama's kill list - they're found in this thing called "the Constitution"

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago)

oh snap

running like a young deer (symsymsym), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 03:03 (twelve years ago)

Is it ok to be a Sinking of the Maine truther or are you all sticking with the official story on that one?

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

BTW I thought it was settled that everyone at the top knew an attack was imminent but the intelligence reports pointed to the Philippines? (w/r/t Pearl Harbor).

I mean, not even Oliver Stone claims FDR "let it happen."

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 03:15 (twelve years ago)

that was before Michael Bay taught us that anything can happen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFhY6IaUJ40

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 03:17 (twelve years ago)

Then again, Churchill really did let all those sailors die with the sinking of the French Fleet... I don't think being suspicious of what FDR knew and when is ALL THAT nutters.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 03:22 (twelve years ago)

Well that's the real question, isn't it? Why? The how and the who is just scenery for the public. Nagumo, Yamamoto, Kimmel, Short, the Dole producers. Keeps 'em guessing like some kind of parlor game, prevents 'em from asking the most important question, why? Why was Pearl Harbor bombed? Who benefited? Who has the power to cover it up? Who?

pplains, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 04:04 (twelve years ago)

Hand-wringers may resent FDR for the loss of life at Pearl Harbor, but it absolutely beats of the alternative history of Nazis unchallenged on the European continent.

What exactly has happened to Russia in this alternative history?

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 10:43 (twelve years ago)

the Kozachok becomes a global sensation as it evolves to complement the steady kicking with punching of the air in the clave rhythm

Z S, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 13:55 (twelve years ago)

this leads them to drop the fight against the Nazis in order to devote more time to the dance, now called the Kozatchak

Z S, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 13:56 (twelve years ago)

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/supreme-court-revives-liberty-lawsuit-obamacare.php?ref=fpa

Pathetic.

― clemenza, Monday, November 26, 2012 11

So is there really a difference between circuit courts on the religious issue re health care law, or is the Supreme Court creating one to jump in and protect the religious right-wingers. Most commentary I saw on this suggested that there was no way that the Court would rule for the right-wing Christian viewpoint. I hope they're correct.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

What exactly has happened to Russia in this alternative history?

Russia more or less retreated out of Europe, using scorched earth tactics as they went. They were already abandoning Moscow when the german offensive got stuck at Stalingrad. This history was after receiving active lend-lease support from the USA. The initial Russian resistance in Europe was very weak to non-existant.

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

Nude activists invade Boehner's office over AIDS budget (nsfw lol):

http://actupny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=137:act-up-and-queerocracy-members-tell-naked-truth-to-speaker-boehner&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=50

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 20:24 (twelve years ago)

Boehner jams 2012

this will surprise many (Nicole), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 20:25 (twelve years ago)

a few cuties in there

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 November 2012 23:34 (twelve years ago)

Susan Rice is never gonna make the GOP happy is she

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 02:08 (twelve years ago)

not unless she denounced McCain as Al-Qaeda and aimed a drone rocket at Phoenix.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 02:11 (twelve years ago)

BENGHAZI!!!

the late great, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 03:09 (twelve years ago)

Gesundheit.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 03:10 (twelve years ago)

Benghazi: word magic so powerful it may retroactively win the election.

Aimless, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 03:11 (twelve years ago)

oh goody

On Thursday, Governor Romney will have a private lunch at the White House with President Obama in the Private Dining Room. It will be the first opportunity they have had to visit since the election. There will be no press coverage of the meeting.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:10 (twelve years ago)

bow-chka-bow-bow

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:14 (twelve years ago)

all this stuff about grover norquist maybe finally kinda losing his grip on the GOP is the hugest dumb smokescreen, come on.

goole, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:14 (twelve years ago)

no it's a big deal

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

a private lunch in the private dining room for a private chat followed by private booty

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

It will be the first opportunity they have had to visit since the election.

lol @ making them sound like old friends. These guys LOATHE one another.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

republicans are not afraid of grover norquist, they just don't want to raise taxes. i want to help but you have no idea what this guy will do to me!!! heh heh.

xp

goole, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

The inspiration for James Bond, the double agent Dusko Popov aka Agent Tricycle, wrote in "Spy/Counterspy" - his no doubt self-serving memoir - that he had intelligence that Pearl Harbor was a target of the Japanese and said that he tried several times to convince Herbert Hoover that this was so, and each time got the brush-off.

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:17 (twelve years ago)

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/mortgage-interest-deduction-once-a-sacred-cow-is-seen-as-vulnerable/?hp

please jesus let this happen

― iatee, Monday, November 26, 2012 4:35 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

flopson, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

lol @ making them sound like old friends. These guys LOATHE one another.

I wonder whether this is so. The press loves to work this angle. Obama looks too diffident to loathe anyone. The last time two candidates looked like they loathed each other was 2000.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

Hope Romney shows up with his gas station/Thanksgiving look.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

The last time two candidates looked like they loathed each other was 2000.

This probably explains McCain since it's one-way.

"ARRRRRGH!!#$!$#@!$#"

"Sorry, did you say something?"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

On the one hand, I'm sad that the deduction responsible for my biggest IRS handout will be examined, otoh sacrifice for the common good etc

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

republicans are not afraid of grover norquist, they just don't want to raise taxes. i want to help but you have no idea what this guy will do to me!!! heh heh.

nah, plenty of people get primaried, that witch hunt would be happening norquist or no tho

iatee, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

like it's more a collective action problem than 'grover norquist' but being one of the republicans who votes to raise taxes is not without risk for a lot of people

iatee, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:24 (twelve years ago)

Isn't most of the discussion about the mortgage interest deduction focused on rich people with expensive houses? Mortgages above a certain level? (Not saying yours isn't one of those, Alfred. Just that I doubt anyone's going to jump on a tax-the-middle-class proposal.)

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

"Is club soda all right? I know better than to offer you tea."

"Ha ha, yes. It will be just fine, Mr. President."

"You're very welcome. Consider it my gift to you."

pplains, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

lol

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:30 (twelve years ago)

On Thursday, Governor Romney will have a private lunch at the White House with President Obama in the Private Dining Room.

It shoulda taken place at today's gas-drilling rights bidding at the Superdome. they can smoke cigars together and toast Sarah Palin's visionary qualities.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:32 (twelve years ago)

"You know, Governor, some would see this glass of soda half-empty,"

"Well, that could be a pragmatic way of looking at it, Mr. President."

"I prefer to see it as 47 percent full."

pplains, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

;_;

the late great, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

"You know, Governor - "

"I agree, Mr. President."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

Oh PLEASE let this happen:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/charlie-mahtesian/2012/11/erickson-mulls-chambliss-challenge-150456.html

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

you go girl

goole, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

Oh please please

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:05 (twelve years ago)

you go girl

Speaking of!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:06 (twelve years ago)

I can't get enough of articles attacking Bowles-Simpson.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:32 (twelve years ago)

Would hope that Obama gets in at least one "Please proceed, governor."

clemenza, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago)

Mitt's campaign manager makes his case.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-good-man-the-right-fight/2012/11/28/5338b27a-38e9-11e2-8a97-363b0f9a0ab3_story.html

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

Or chief strategist or whatever.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/110499/the-illusory-power-grover-norquist

iatee, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/mortgage-interest-deduction-once-a-sacred-cow-is-seen-as-vulnerable/?hp

please jesus let this happen

― iatee, Monday, November 26, 2012 4:35 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

― flopson, Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:18 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark

There is the very real possibility that I would have to sell my house should this occur

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

no that would only happen in my dreams, irl this will only affect very rich people

iatee, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:55 (twelve years ago)

I would imagine they'll cap it or have it continue for people below a certain income level. Like mortgage interest is deductible, but not for anything above a certain level.

all the people who bought homes under the "oh, here is how much we will loan you in 2005" bankers who didn't care if you could repay it will be super-fucked, though, if they're not already.

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:57 (twelve years ago)

I don't know I could see some "shared sacrifice" bullshit. I bought a house 2 years ago and it will be probably another 15 years before I'm paying more principal than interest. In the meantime the interest deduction is pretty valuable from my pov.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

I also feel as if I have zero control over this so I'll just wait and see what happens then try and deal.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:27 (twelve years ago)

by "feel" I mean "know"

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:27 (twelve years ago)

Any reductions of the home mortgage interest deduction would have to be phased in slowly. It would have far too large implications for consumer behavior to just get rid of it at once. A cap would be more workable, but even then it would cause big dislocations in some housing markets. Think of Vail and Aspen.

Aimless, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

they're not going to get rid of it for the average homeowner, they're gonna target people with multiple homes, or huge ass houses

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

It looks like it already only exempts for interest on the first million dollars of debt, so.. I'm not sure how that's calculated.

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.irs.gov/publications/p936/ar02.html#en_US_2011_publink1000229890

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:01 (twelve years ago)

I think I'll just never buy a house instead

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:02 (twelve years ago)

http://www.examiner.com/article/glenn-beck-goes-off-deep-end-dunks-obama-figurine-jar-of-urine
comedy

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

According to this, I should donate my money to a nonprofit religious organization I run, then give myself a stipend to pay the mortgage with, and deduct it twice.

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

man, until I got to the end of that article I was all "that is a shit-ton of urine, Glenn Beck"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:11 (twelve years ago)

he is supposed to take a picture of it and sell that, duh. dude has never even seen piss christ

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:13 (twelve years ago)

what a fucking psychotic loser

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:14 (twelve years ago)

did you guys actually watch the video? holy shit. you can just watch it in 5 second chunks, skipping a minute ahead each time, and it's glorious. he keeps speaking with a ridiculous french accent and slamming reproductions of several famous paintings (pollack, picasso, etc) in the background. his commentary is seriously not far from the content of legendary ILX thread ART?

then he takes out a marker and covers up the nudity of the paintings on the wall. then he keeps talking about how great America is because even though he hates the paintings and doesn't understand how anyone else could like them...THIS document (*he points to the Constitution*) guarantees the rights of all Americans to...uh....make works of genius? anyway, the Constitution, bless it, back to the french accent, and then he of course builds up to dunking the Obama figuring in a bottle of fake piss. but when he finally does it (after 5 minutes of talking about doing it), it floats at the top. he quickly asks a producer for the official poking stick to try to get it to sink to the bottom, but unfortunately, physics and gravity and stuff, and it continues to float at the top. so he just puts a cap on the bottle and moves on to the title: "Obama in Pee Pee", alternative name, "Flobama"

i went to bed immediately afterward and had absurd dreamz

Z S, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

If this poseur had actually used piss instead of beer, it'd be noteworthy, at least worth a chuckle and a quiet golf-clap, but he literally didn't have it in him, I guess.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

My art idea is to get a copy of that book by the crazy mormon john birch society-style dude that Beck is all into, and seal it in a plexiglass cube of Glenn Beck's urine

The freaky part will be him trying to figure out how I got his actual urine, when apparently all he has is beer.

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:37 (twelve years ago)

I don't drink much beer but I understand it's fairly easy to turn beer into urine

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:38 (twelve years ago)

what is glenn beck doing with beer, anyway? he's a mormon.

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:39 (twelve years ago)

maybe that's why he needed a stick to push down the figurine, he's not allowed to touch beer

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:40 (twelve years ago)

ex-alkie too iirc

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:41 (twelve years ago)

so the real question is why there is beer on the same stage as this man

mh, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:41 (twelve years ago)

maybe it's ginger ale

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:43 (twelve years ago)

McGovern for the win

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/11/visual-history-presidents-awkwardly-meeting-losers-they-defeated/59403/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 21:47 (twelve years ago)

Wait, hold up, why is Obama meeting Romney? Is there a human in the United States that less people give a shit about than Mitt Romney at the moment?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:08 (twelve years ago)

Anne still loves him.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:09 (twelve years ago)

there's Jeremy Yorgin of Desloge, Missouri.

i'm sure romney is dreading this meeting as well

Z S, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:10 (twelve years ago)

maybe they're taking Gergen's advice and making him Secretary of Business

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:15 (twelve years ago)

"I'd like to make you Secretary of State"
"omg really?????"
"hahaha no, get the fuck off my lawn"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:15 (twelve years ago)

re: loathing, there were reports that Obama really does hate Mitt but I haven't heard anything about Mitt loathing anyone. Politics is just some weird game to him, I doubt there's real personal feelings involved other than a desire for victory.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:19 (twelve years ago)

would be funny if Obama was all "Security! There's some scary white guy trying to break into my house!" when Mitt showed up

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

actually "get the fuck off the people's lawn" would be better/more accurate

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

Can The Rock appear behind Mitt at that point?

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:22 (twelve years ago)

wow, the people's lawn, never know what u folx will come up with next

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:23 (twelve years ago)

man, I don't if I can really donate to Bloomberg but it's tempting

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:25 (twelve years ago)

when mitt arrives, someone should ask to see his birth certificate

mookieproof, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:32 (twelve years ago)

I think you mean his corpo-dyke clone

xp

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 22:32 (twelve years ago)

It's funny how Wolf Blitzer always says "so-called fiscal cliff." Presumably he's trying to reassure people who think it's a real cliff, and are worried about falling into a giant chasm like all the Egyptians in The Ten Commandments.

clemenza, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:35 (twelve years ago)

the people's lawn was pretty wtf in fairness

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:49 (twelve years ago)

http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/27/news/economy/buffett-dimon-treasury-secretary/index.html

nice

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:49 (twelve years ago)

lol http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/fox-news-host-gets-a-call-from-a-republican-opera

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 29 November 2012 00:04 (twelve years ago)

Anyone else disappointed that did not turn out to be about a "Republican opera"?

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 29 November 2012 00:04 (twelve years ago)

yes

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 00:06 (twelve years ago)

yes

pplains, Thursday, 29 November 2012 00:25 (twelve years ago)

"Republican opera"

http://cdn.theatermania.com/article/19176/1.jpg ???

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:23 (twelve years ago)

french republican?

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:23 (twelve years ago)

corpo-dyke clone

a forgotten Bruce Sterling sidekick

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:24 (twelve years ago)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/02/04/arts/NIXON/NIXON-articleLarge.jpg

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:33 (twelve years ago)

Can someone (DJP for ex) comment on Charles Pierce's suspicion that should John Kerry step down Scott Brown still has no shot at his seat?

First of all, there's no indication that Brown would win another special election just because he won the last one. He severely damaged his brand by running an idiotically harsh campaign against Elizabeth Warren, and there's no indication that the voters up here have forgotten that. He had two things going for him in 2010 — he was allegedly a "moderate" Republican, and people liked him. The second of those two attributes is now deader than Foster Furcolo, and he certainly didn't run as any kind of moderate.

That aside, do not sleep on the fact that the Commonwealth is perfectly capable of finagling this scenario off the boards entirely. The Boston Herald, the local tabloid that lined up strongly behind Brown in both campaigns, was warning about this very thing a couple of days ago.

"I think that would be preferable. It would certainly save the taxpayers money if they don't have to pay for another election," said Phil Johnston, former chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party. "I think people are campaigned out. I think the governor is very popular and most voters would be happy to support his choice until the next general election," Johnston added.

I've known Phil Johnston for a long time, and no flies have ever abided on the man. The Democrats have changed the rules twice in the last eight years for purely political purposes and, at least in theory, there's nothing to stop them from doing so again in such a way that Governor Deval Patrick can appoint Kerry's successor. (Patrick's not running again anyway and therefore can stand the gaff.) Of course, they only would do this to save us all the time and expense and annoyance of another campaign. Knocko's only ever had ye'er in'thrests at heart.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:07 (twelve years ago)

i can't believe republicans are still pushing this benghazi conspiracy bullshit

Mordy, Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:21 (twelve years ago)

there's not really a downside for them afaics

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:24 (twelve years ago)

jeff goldberg pointed out today that rice would be a much more interventionist choice (primarily due to her experience in Rwanda) than a lot of the other possible candidates and that mccain is really shooting his own foreign agenda in the foot by opposing her confirmation.

Mordy, Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:32 (twelve years ago)

goldberg must be worried

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:33 (twelve years ago)

this pipeline stock shit sucks bad for her http://www.onearth.org/article/susan-rice-obama-secretary-state-tar-sands-finances#.ULbAUmEp7d0.facebook

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:37 (twelve years ago)

When Scott Brown's campaign wasn't busy being horribly racist, it spent its time talking up Brown's bipartisanship and how he sponsored bills to keep Congress from writing itself free money, so it's not entirely true that he didn't run as a moderate Republican; he ran as a moderate Republican surrounded by horrible racists. I still think he has a good shot at re-election in a special election due to name recognition and looking like an anonymously good-looking ex-fratboy (aka Ben Affleck Syndrome). It would be a tight race unless the Democrats put Martha "I am the worst candidate in the world" Coakley up against him again.

If the Democrats rig things so they can just appoint someone to Kerry's seat, lol and smh.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:50 (twelve years ago)

i can't believe republicans are still pushing this benghazi conspiracy bullshit

Really this sort of attention to detail ten years ago would have saved trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:56 (twelve years ago)

how many of them are black or Hispanic

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

B1 and C5 are the same guy, right?

pplains, Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:12 (twelve years ago)

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=391D2852-991E-49C9-93C9-EAAB1A39B56D

According to Politico, it looks like the Obama caving on medicare is beginning (again):

There is only one way to make the medicine of tax hikes go down easier for Republicans: specific cuts to entitlement spending. Democrats involved in the process said the chest-pounding by liberals is just that — they know they will ultimately cave and trim entitlements to get a deal done.

$400 billion in entitlement cuts. That’s the floor, according to Democratic aides, and it could go higher in the final give and take. The vast majority of the savings, and perhaps all of it, will come from Medicare, through a combination of means-testing, raising the retirement age and other “efficiencies” to be named later. It is possible Social Security gets tossed into the mix, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) plans to fight that, if he has to yield on other spending fronts.

But on the bright side, the Dems don't want these things to kick in for ten to 20 years

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:50 (twelve years ago)

Fuck Politico

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/raising-medicare-eligibility-age-durbin.php?ref=fpa

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

During his floor speech, Durbin staked out the position that Congress shouldn’t seriously consider raising Medicare eligibility until its clear that the Affordable Care Act is operating well, so that seniors between 65 and 67 can fall back into a different (though less generous) public system.

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

"Democrats want to wait awhile to raise the age for Medicare, which they might not even do, if things don't work out well." what a bunch of hacks

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

That's why Politico is suggesting that the Medicare changes could happen ten years down the road-- that's when Durbin, who earlier supported the even more extreme Bowles Simpson Medicare changes, will go along and presumably other Dems. Maybe Republicans who want to cut Medicare now will oppose this and not support Boehner on it.

The left and the Progressive Democratic Caucus has mostly failed to spell out to Obama and to the mainstream press a clear alternative to entitlement cuts-- such health care expense reducing items that Robert Reich, Paul Krugman and Dean Baker have suggested that would give the administrators of medicare more control to force down drug and health prices and to reduce administrative costs. We're are instead stuck with the phony bipartisan compromise situation where the elites say if you want tax revenues for the rich to go up a tad, you need to cut medicare for all

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

We're not stuck with it if it's happening ten years in the future, and can be altered by future Congresses

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

The utter cowardice and stupidity of the Beltway class in action.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

We're not stuck with it if it's happening ten years in the future, and can be altered by future Congresses

― beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:05 AM (2 minutes ago)

yyyyyeah maybe we just shouldn't mess w/ it at all

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

or we can deal with it in....2033 or 5.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

i don't think we should mess with it at all, either, but it's not a bad compromise if it can be changed in the future

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

ehhhh, I generally am suspicious of anything temporary and non-binding in Washington because all kinds of shit that was meant to be a one-off becomes enshrined as a done deal, e.g. the Bush tax cuts.

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

The left and the Progressive Democratic Caucus has mostly failed to spell out to Obama and to the mainstream press a clear alternative to entitlement cuts-- such health care expense reducing items that Robert Reich, Paul Krugman and Dean Baker have suggested that would give the administrators of medicare more control to force down drug and health prices and to reduce administrative costs. We're are instead stuck with the phony bipartisan compromise situation where the elites say if you want tax revenues for the rich to go up a tad, you need to cut medicare for all

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Payment_Advisory_Board

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

so we have to give in to raising the medicare eligibilty age in 10 years - and make no mistake, that will be law and will be the new normal, and un-fucking that up will require future concessions - so we can increase the top marginal income tax rate by 4%? really dude?

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

and make no mistake, that will be law and will be the new normal, and un-fucking that up will require future concessions

if you say so DUDE!

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

curious where these future courageous Congresses will come from -- a laboratory?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago)

ha no democrats and republicans in 10 years will totally work together to wipe that off the books for nothing, hahaha sure

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago)

once Boomers start retiring and bitching it up, i betcha they will

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:16 (twelve years ago)

oque

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

retire?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

die!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:18 (twelve years ago)

imagine an army of Boomers getting sick and old, they're all retired, and have nothing better to do than organize. you're damn right they'll switch this (hypothetical) law back.

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

they=Congress

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

Mr. Que, Krugman and other bloggers want to give the Independent Payment Advisory Board more power, but the Republicans have blocked this with their "death panels" talk.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:20 (twelve years ago)

with such a dignified name for their group, can't believe "krugman and other bloggers" don't have more say

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago)

sorry i'm such an optimist guys, what can i say

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)

sorry i'm such an optimist guys, what can i say

― beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:22 AM (7 minutes ago)

yeah man i can't wait until 10 years from now when congress is totally progressive and half of those boomers you were talking about don't watch fox news. it's gonna be great

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

what the fuck are you talking about kevin

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

fox news????

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

i'm talking angry boomers who want health care

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

you're making an assumption that "baby boomers" are this monolithic group that will somehow magically vote/press congress to act in its own interests. i'm reminding you that half the country are brainwashed morons

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

do you have evidence, or care to make an argument that baby boomers couldn't do such a thing?

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

or do you want to continue to be a cynical dick, your choice

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

keep in mind, a large number of congress members will probably be baby boomers if/when this ever happens

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago)

so they can relate, you know?

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:49 (twelve years ago)

and they will not give a shit about the plebes in their age group.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

yeah those working class senators certainly have the people's interests at heart

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

like i said: your choice

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

x-post

Can't I dream that the Congressional Progressive Caucus will figure out a way to get the ear of the Prez, Congressional leaders, and the mainstream press.

According to wiki:

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the largest membership organization within the Democratic Caucus in the United States Congress with 76 declared members

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago)

like i said: your choice

― beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:01 PM (5 minutes ago)

pretty deft way of distracting from the fact that it's you who are living in a fantasy world and your 'evidence' was hilariously naive speculation that a coalition of somehow super liberal baby boomers will vote to undo - key word - legislation that raises the medicare eligibilty age. there's no 'evidence' for either side, i don't even know what that word could mean in this context. how about how the retirement age has already been raised in the past, and how senate dems and obama already put raising the medicare eligibility age on the table?

you really want that $680B over 10 years badly enough to risk raising the medicare eligibilty age?

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago)

also just really not sure what is gained by it at all. By all means let the Republicans demonstrate that they are more interested in raising the retirement age than the marginal tax rate on millionaires. Don't see why Democrats have to be rushing to this as some sort of "compromise."

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

Obama's obsession with bipartisanship

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago)

this quote is going around:

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=391D2852-991E-49C9-93C9-EAAB1A39B56D

There is only one way to make the medicine of tax hikes go down easier for Republicans: specific cuts to entitlement spending. Democrats involved in the process said the chest-pounding by liberals is just that — they know they will ultimately cave and trim entitlements to get a deal done.

A top Democratic official said talks have stalled on this question since Obama and congressional leaders had their friendly-looking post-election session at the White House. “Republicans want the president to own the whole offer upfront, on both the entitlement and the revenue side, and that’s not going to happen because the president is not going to negotiate with himself,” the official said. “There’s a standoff, and the staff hasn’t gotten anywhere. Rob Nabors [the White House negotiator], has been saying: ‘This is what we want on revenues on the down payment. What’s you guys’ ask on the entitlement side?’ And they keep looking back at us and saying: ‘We want you to come up with that and pitch us.’ That’s not going to happen.

goole, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:38 (twelve years ago)

obama? negotiate with himself? never

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:43 (twelve years ago)

The White House negotiators of course tell Politico that they will agree to entitlement cuts grand bargain style

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:46 (twelve years ago)

http://electricsheepcomix.com/sketch/?p=244

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

there's no 'evidence' for either side, i

there's no "evidence" that they are going to raise the age, either!

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

saw a pic of romney meeting obama at the white house wearing a suit. I would totally roll up in shorts with a 30 of coors if I just lost an election. the fuck do you want from me anymore?

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

They don't have to be liberal baby boomers, they just have to be baby boomers that believe the world should revolve around them. In other words: baby boomers.

(aren't most boomers over retirement age right now, though?)

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

no

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

baby boom ended in 1964, so those dudes are still young

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

there's no 'evidence' for either side, i

there's no "evidence" that they are going to raise the age, either!

― beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:55 PM (9 minutes ago)

yeah that's one of the two sides i was referring to, que

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

thanks

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:19 (twelve years ago)

guess you should have been a little clearer then, hmm?

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:20 (twelve years ago)

not...really?

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:25 (twelve years ago)

is this argument as unsatisfying to participate in as it is to read?

Mordy, Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago)

baby boom ended in 1964, so those dudes are still young

I don't feel very young, but "whatevs," kids.

WilliamC, Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:30 (twelve years ago)

yeah but you're not really near retiring yet, are you?

beef richards (Mr. Que), Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:31 (twelve years ago)

;_;

sadly, no

WilliamC, Thursday, 29 November 2012 18:34 (twelve years ago)

The 'retirement age' for receiving full SS benefits is already scheduled to move up to 67yo under the present law. For millions of working class low-income earners this is very fucked up. For example, waiting on tables is a very physically demanding job and 67 is a looong way from young; people wear out. Moving the age any higher just fucks these people worse.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

Do you think anyone who's waiting tables at 65 is going to be able to retire at 65?

mh, Thursday, 29 November 2012 19:32 (twelve years ago)

What you are asking as a binary is not so simple as that. When I was driving school buses I met a lot of people who used it as a 'retirement job', iow a part time job to eke out their SS income. That reality is quite common. Retirement for working class stiffs is mainly a plan to patch together bits and pieces of income and savings to where they can slow down or stop. The details work out differently for everyone.

In a nutshell, no one who works a physically demanding full time job, such a waiting table or construction, into their 60s is going to want to continue to do it one day longer than necessary. Moving the SS benefit age higher than 67 just pushes that day further and further toward the horizon, by stretching out the path to an adequate retirement income. The further it stretches, the more punishing it gets.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 November 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

Well, yes, but I was trying to figure out if the waiting tables was a possibility as one of those retirement jobs, or if they're going for another, lower-paying job and the lack of SS to draw on would hurt that.

I mean, you can start pulling from SS earlier than 65 now but with a penalty. I guess they could make that a graduated thing?

mh, Thursday, 29 November 2012 19:58 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, in Joe Biden news: http://gawker.com/5964301/seven-scenes-from-joe-bidens-big-adventure-looking-for-pies-at-costco

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/186trveoj2m2mjpg/xlarge.jpg

super perv powder (Phil D.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:29 (twelve years ago)

other white guy not very amused in that photo

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/liberals_double_down_no_entitlement_cuts/

Mordy, Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:33 (twelve years ago)

secret service agents aren't allowed to look amused :(

mayor mcpotle (mh), Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:34 (twelve years ago)

xxxp check out the epic side-eye from dude at far left

super perv powder (Phil D.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:34 (twelve years ago)

x-post--Salon is quoting the Progressive Caucus, now if only the rest of the mainstream media will, and the White House will pay attention. They need to stay together on this

While Ellison and progressives have said they oppose benefit cuts, they’re open to other means of cutting costs in entitlement programs. “There are better options that protect seniors, children and disabled Americans,” Ellison said, citing the elimination of the income cap on Social Security taxes or letting Medicare negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies, something Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin also floated yesterday.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:05 (twelve years ago)

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/186tjtl15wrwrgif/medium.gif

pplains, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/186tyunaacn4kjpg/original.jpg

"This office? Not yours."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

That looks fake for some reason.

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:16 (twelve years ago)

Mitt just sent his wax standin.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:17 (twelve years ago)

god Obama couldn't have hung a Reagan portrait as a courtesy

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:18 (twelve years ago)

i thought the statue of liberty picture was a monty python still for a second

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

is that a statue in the far left corner of two Greek boys playing leapfrog?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

No, it's 'Bronco Buster' by Frederic Remington.

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:24 (twelve years ago)

Salon is quoting the Progressive Caucus, now if only the rest of the mainstream media will, and the White House will pay attention

Progressive caucus is pretty tight and Pelosi is one of the greatest vote counters ever, would be surprised if they budge on this. given this is just PR pushback at this stage

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:24 (twelve years ago)

Xpost per Lincoln, the Reagan portrait is hung in the bathroom

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

The body language in that photo I can't even

super perv powder (Phil D.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

Considering Obama's record of compromising to no gain, I really hope he sticks firm here. He has absolutely no reason to budge. He does nothing, all the cuts expire, and in order to restore balance, the Republicans will have to pass lower class tax cuts ASAP. If they don't, it's a total baby out with the bathwater move that will destroy them and their party for years.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

You talking about the fiscal cliff or that handshake?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:29 (twelve years ago)

lol

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:30 (twelve years ago)

isn't it kind of cruel to have the meeting in the oval office? that's like breaking up with someone in your new girlfriend's hot tub

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:31 (twelve years ago)

why would you invite your girlfriend to use your new girlfriend's tub?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

exactly!

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

Hot Tub Chicago Machine

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago)

it's an awkward zone, it's the place where the magic happens, where dreams come true, it's the oval office

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago)

I know it's not a good analogy but work with me here

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago)

it's an awkward zone, it's the place where the magic happens, where dreams come true, it's the oval office

I've never heard a vagina described quite this way

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:34 (twelve years ago)

lol the oval office

that blue image in the back of the room just took on a whole new meaning

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:35 (twelve years ago)

"I'm ... is he... I'm getting the other-hand-stays-in-pocket! So that's what it feels like from this side"

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:49 (twelve years ago)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/Images/Screen%20shot%202012-11-29%20at%203.28.00%20PM.png

This afternoon, President Obama and Governor Romney visited for an hour over lunch in the Private Dining Room adjacent to the Oval Office. Governor Romney congratulated the President for the success of his campaign and wished him well over the coming four years. The focus of their discussion was on America's leadership in the world and the importance of maintaining that leadership position in the future. They pledged to stay in touch, particularly if opportunities to work together on shared interests arise in the future. Their lunch menu included white turkey chili and Southwestern grilled chicken salad.

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:59 (twelve years ago)

They pledged to stay in touch, particularly if opportunities to work together on shared interests arise in the future.

aaaaaaaaahahahaha

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 21:59 (twelve years ago)

See, Mitt finally reached the White House after all.

fiscal cliff huxtable (latebloomer), Thursday, 29 November 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

either O really truly believes good ideas can come from anywhere or he's being a sociopath.

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Thursday, 29 November 2012 22:17 (twelve years ago)

i'm assuming the white house press officer wrote up the description of their meeting a few weeks ago. it's so generic. i'm sure the real conversation was like:

O: well looky what the cat dragged in
R: fucked to meet you, asshole
O: you shut your mouth

etc

Z S, Thursday, 29 November 2012 22:24 (twelve years ago)

flag pin comes OFF

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Thursday, 29 November 2012 22:26 (twelve years ago)

"great job in the first debate"

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 29 November 2012 22:27 (twelve years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/technology/senate-committee-approves-stricter-privacy-for-e-mail.html

amazing how this isn't illegal to begin with

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:10 (twelve years ago)

He does nothing, all the cuts expire, and in order to restore balance, the Republicans will have to pass lower class tax cuts ASAP. If they don't, it's a total baby out with the bathwater move that will destroy them and their party for years.

I've said this before: I think this assumes a level of rationality on the part of House Republicans that I just don't believe is there, even when it comes to risks involving self-preservation. If I had to guess at their thinking, it's that they'd be okay with another recession. They probably feel they lost the last election because the economy was teetering between treading water and modest improvement; the key to winning the next one will be to make sure it's an unambiguously ruinous economy.

clemenza, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:18 (twelve years ago)

But they'll get another recession and they'll be on record explicitly against a tax cut for the middle class because the wealthy won't be getting one, too. Assuming they don't gave, let this cliff stuff go down, then still refuse to play ball.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:20 (twelve years ago)

Let's not play ball on a cliff for godsakes

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:21 (twelve years ago)

I'm not arguing with your logic, Josh, just that logic means anything to them.

clemenza, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:23 (twelve years ago)

I think it means something to some of them. The question is whether Boehner has the balls (which he's playing with, on a cliff) to confront the fatalists in his party.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:26 (twelve years ago)

we need a gif

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:26 (twelve years ago)

there's really only two outcomes that result in a deal here: 1) Boehner makes caves but finds some way to simultaneously save face and hold enough of his caucus together to pass the deal; 2) Boehner loses total control of his caucus and the Dems peel off enough scared GOP House votes to pass a deal

the former seems most likely

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:30 (twelve years ago)

makes

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:30 (twelve years ago)

I don't think there are enough fissures in the House GOP for the Dems to exploit such that the latter comes to pass

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:31 (twelve years ago)

Let me put it another way: whatever they're saying publically, I'm sure their overriding concern/fear is that the economy rights itself, Obama leaves office with a pretty good domestic record, and all their apocalyptic theatre during the first term is conclusively proven to have been idiotic. I hope I'm wrong and you're right, but based on the last four years, nothing from them would surprise me, no matter how irrational it might seem.

clemenza, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:34 (twelve years ago)

during the first term is conclusively proven to have been idiotic

eh the American electorate doesn't have this long a memory. otherwise they would have already realized that this tax cuts = growth! thing is total bullshit

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:40 (twelve years ago)

well, more than they already have, I guess

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:41 (twelve years ago)

the American electorate is now completely behind the president on taxes, SS, and Medicaire.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:41 (twelve years ago)

I hope I'm wrong and you're right, but based on the last four years, nothing from them would surprise me, no matter how irrational it might seem.

Or how stunningly hypocritical!

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

eh I dunno about completely. mostly, sure.

Boehner is a classic old-school dealmaker, the only question here is how much he can control his caucus - which, frankly, is a huge question given his shitty track record. He's been remarkably terrible at holding them in line.

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

Maybe he's just hoping Obama will cave, again, and push this battle another two years, again.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

American public by a sizable margin wants both SS and Medicare left alone; it also wants to raise taxes on plutocrats.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:44 (twelve years ago)

i got polled about this stuff yesterday. 20 minutes of questions rating different issues by importance, agreeing w/ one of three policy statements, demographic answers. they asked me about the fiscal cliff and i said i considered debt a 0 out of 10 for important issues facing country, and was against any cuts in social services. they also asked whether i was scared of a demographically latino majority changing the 'character' of this country or if i thought changing demographics just represented american traditions of immigration + diversity + success (ie secret racism test?). i was happy to be surveyed - i hope it helps.

Mordy, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:51 (twelve years ago)

That's not very secret racism!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:53 (twelve years ago)

I love taking surveys. the last time I took one I told them I was an overweight gay filipino plutocrat making over $500k a year

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 00:02 (twelve years ago)

waiting for you to tell him you're a homo satrap.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 00:03 (twelve years ago)

they explained that americans often think of themselves in terms of one of the following classes, and asked me if i thought of myself as lower class, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, or upper class

Mordy, Friday, 30 November 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago)

Ruling class

Jeff, Friday, 30 November 2012 00:13 (twelve years ago)

Stained class.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 November 2012 00:15 (twelve years ago)

the last time I took one I told them I was an overweight gay filipino plutocrat making over $500k a year

― Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, November 30, 2012 12:02 AM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

honesty is the best policy

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 30 November 2012 00:17 (twelve years ago)

Must be a new policy

Z S, Friday, 30 November 2012 02:54 (twelve years ago)

Obama has The Divinyls on his iPod

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 30 November 2012 04:29 (twelve years ago)

who doesn't?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 30 November 2012 05:02 (twelve years ago)

Michele Bachmann.

bizarro gazzara, Friday, 30 November 2012 10:08 (twelve years ago)

headline:

The Changing Power Dynamic Between Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan
Now Ryan is in the position of power.

heh heh heh

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11/the-changing-power-dynamic-between-mitt-romney-and-paul-ryan/265707/

j., Friday, 30 November 2012 13:02 (twelve years ago)

O really truly believes good ideas can come from anywhere

he's used 98% of "Mitt's" fucking ideas already.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 30 November 2012 13:08 (twelve years ago)

That Atlantic piece is a back rub away from becoming slash

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 30 November 2012 13:55 (twelve years ago)

Wasn't Ryan a power bottom all along?

誤訳侮辱, Friday, 30 November 2012 14:40 (twelve years ago)

we need a gif

guys you may be surprised to learn that some pretty weird stuff comes up when you GIS "balls on a cliff"

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 30 November 2012 14:48 (twelve years ago)

Charles Krauthammer (and some other right-wing types) are ready to let the cuts expire:

Republicans must stop acting like supplicants. If Obama so loves those Clinton rates, Republicans should say: Then go over the cliff and have them all.

And add: But if you want a grand bargain, then deal. If we give way on taxes, we want, in return, serious discretionary cuts, clearly spelled-out entitlement cuts and real tax reform.

Otherwise, strap on your parachute, Mr. President. We’ll ride down together.

curmudgeon, Friday, 30 November 2012 14:52 (twelve years ago)

Not sure K-Ham is the sort of guy to whom you want to strap a parachute if yaknowwhatImean

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 14:53 (twelve years ago)

http://honestinfomercialreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/johnny_carson.jpg

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 30 November 2012 14:59 (twelve years ago)

view of the Obama IT operations for those who are a little more technology-literate:
http://kylerush.net/blog/meet-the-obama-campaigns-250-million-fundraising-platform/

mayor mcpotle (mh), Friday, 30 November 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

Conservatives has a sad:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/11/down-and-out-with-ted-cruz-and-the-gop/265767/#

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:35 (twelve years ago)

oh my god please please PLEASE let them double-down on social issues

the lols will be so fantastic

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

They got nothing better to do, let 'em.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

I wouldn't mind discussing these questions with them if I got served overcooked steak drenched in Brie.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago)

"We decided not to fight for religious liberty, not to fight for traditional marriage, not to fight for unborn children in America," he added. "And it was an abysmal failure."

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago)

Two to one says a good chunk of the people at that dinner will be mentioned in four years' time as dearly departed colleagues.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:44 (twelve years ago)

Anyway, perhaps related:

http://www.indecisionforever.com/blog/2012/11/30/five-best-counties-for-conservative-republicans

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:45 (twelve years ago)

That's a pretty house in the last photo!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:47 (twelve years ago)

Sean Fieler, the group's chairman, dismissed the idea that Republicans could succeed by "mimicking the tactics of the left." "Creating ever more resonant mantras, an ever better organized party, and hiring a raft of behavioral scientists to manipulate and manage the electorate will not breathe new life into the American experiment," he said. "Such efforts will not even deliver us an electoral victory." Those tactics, he said, could work only for the political party that panders to people's baser instincts with class warfare and "the enthusiastic embrace of sexual impulses" -- the Democrats.

this is great. "i don't want to do politics."

goole, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:48 (twelve years ago)

"the political party that panders to "the enthusiastic embrace of sexual impulses" -- the Democrats.

smdh, I just can't even... yeah, just keep spouting that.

Naked webcam celebrity (Dan Peterson), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

good verb, Dan!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:51 (twelve years ago)

"the enthusiastic embrace of sexual impulses"

I'm currently listening to the first Gun Club album and this feels like an apt description

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh6ggwGtJoQ

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:51 (twelve years ago)

I must confess, I did not vote Republican because they were not right wing enough for me. All I heard on abortion, immigration, gay marriage and the like was compromise, compromise, compromise.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 November 2012 17:56 (twelve years ago)

Stay tuned next week for a look at the best counties for liberal Democrats.

curious about this tbh. like what is the smallest, most liberal county?

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

Haha, that Fieler dude donated $2,400 to Christine O'Donnell's campaign. Hedge-fund trader, goldbug and astute judge of character.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/sean-fieler.asp?cycle=10

Naked webcam celebrity (Dan Peterson), Friday, 30 November 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

not a witch

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 18:07 (twelve years ago)

She did turn me into a newt.

super perv powder (Phil D.), Friday, 30 November 2012 18:11 (twelve years ago)

what is the smallest, most liberal county?

humboldt? someplace in VT? i wanna know too

bertrim hapaz (anky), Friday, 30 November 2012 18:25 (twelve years ago)

to the Democrats it's known as Humboldt's gift.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 November 2012 18:26 (twelve years ago)

hmm my guesses would either be somewhere on the iron range (northern MN), the loess hills (weirdly very blue region along the mississippi along MN, WI, IA and IL.

but now that i think about it, it's probably somewhere in NM.

goole, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

possibly a v. black rural part of the south.

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago)

lowest pop tho?

goole, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:36 (twelve years ago)

Thurston County is that one county that's always blue in Nebraska. Pop. 6940.

pplains, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

well what were aiming for isn't just blue, it's trying to find the lowest 'population x GOP vote %' right?

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:53 (twelve years ago)

Thurston voted for Obama 58 percent, which is big for Nebraska.

So find the most lopsided blue counties and pick the lowest one?

pplains, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

the other element to this is 'county' is a fairly arbitrary measure

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

but in general 'votes blue at highest rate' + 'very low population density' is def gonna = 'doesn't have white people' + 'very low population density'. also vermont, which is just some bizarro world.

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 18:59 (twelve years ago)

I am pretty sure there are some tiny counties in NorCal that are waaaaay white and way liberal fwiw

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

Hahah that puts it mildly. But it also depends how close you are to the coast.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 30 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

def

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

Bolinas etc

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

well it's important to remember that those areas have rural rednecky populations too

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago)

San Francisco 83.2% 214,829 13.5% 34,896 3.2% 8,387 258,112
Alameda 78.9% 469,648 18.2% 108,182 2.9% 17,075 594,905
Santa Cruz 75.2% 61,106 21.1% 17,132 3.7% 3,056 81,294
Marin 74.2% 62,929 23.3% 19,760 2.4% 2,158 81,847
San Mateo 71.2% 143,976 26.6% 53,853 2.2% 4,292 202,121
Sonoma 70.8% 124,504 26.0% 45,666 3.2% 5,568 175,738
Los Angeles 69.5% 2,154,998 28.1% 870,734 2.4% 75,110 3,100,842
Santa Clara 69.5% 300,889 28.1% 121,501 2.5% 10,506 432,896
Mendocino 66.2% 11,869 28.6% 5,129 5.2% 930 17,928
Monterey 65.8% 50,852 32.0% 24,714 2.2% 1,693 77,259
Contra Costa 65.6% 219,090 32.1% 107,318 2.2% 7,424 333,832
Yolo 65.2% 38,856 32.0% 19,080 2.8% 1,677 59,613
Imperial 63.6% 17,464 34.8% 9,545 1.6% 444 27,453
Napa 63.1% 35,870 34.3% 19,526 2.6% 1,457 56,853

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago)

vs
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/president/alabama.html

Greene 83.0% 4,402
Macon 87.0% 9,444

iatee, Friday, 30 November 2012 19:07 (twelve years ago)

wouldn't it be one of those districts with 0 romney votes?

liljon /bia/ bia (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:12 (twelve years ago)

democrats in the deep south may not be what you think they are

Aimless, Friday, 30 November 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

well it's important to remember that those areas have rural rednecky populations too

right, I'm very aware of that. otoh Bolinas pop is like 2k and it's unincorporated so

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)

Greene 83.0% 4,402
Macon 87.0% 9,444

― iatee, Friday, November 30, 2012 1:07 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The pop for Greene county is 9,045. That's a whopping 49% voter turnout!

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 30 November 2012 19:23 (twelve years ago)

Christian Slater's provisional ballot rejected in Miami-Dade.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 1 December 2012 12:59 (twelve years ago)

Who actually chooses these?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/david-letterman-2012-kennedy-center-honoree/2012/11/30/77d96768-38bd-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_gallery.html?hpid=z6

Not that I don't think Letterman's deserving--as much as most recipients, anyway--but "payback" popped into my mind too. Which is why I ask the question.

clemenza, Saturday, 1 December 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

So what IS Up with Dianne Feinstein's amendment to end indefinite detention for American citizens?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 1 December 2012 17:41 (twelve years ago)

http://maxgif.com/7aH

http://www.lememe.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/rick (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Saturday, 1 December 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

sexxxy jeans

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 1 December 2012 21:08 (twelve years ago)

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/syria_uses_iraq_for_help_retrieving_helicopters_from_russia/

i guess it's not news that the US has totally lost control of iraq but this dramatizes that. also, between this, the internet shutdown, and the rebels entering damascus things are about to get a lot worse there i think.

Mordy, Sunday, 2 December 2012 01:15 (twelve years ago)

Russia’s prime minister, Dmitri Medvedev, said this week in an interview with the French newspaper Le Figaro that arms shipments are part of a longstanding contract with the Syrian military to repair equipment for “defense against an external aggression.”

“We must fulfill the obligations connected to our contracts,” Medvedev said, noting that Russia has faced a legal conflict after suspending some arms deliveries to Iran.

Mordy, Sunday, 2 December 2012 01:34 (twelve years ago)

man, Veronique de Rugy, one of the Corner's favorite economists, got destroyed by an irate Bruce Bartlett, who at one point actually said "goddamn" on TV.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 December 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago)

on Chris Hayes' show.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 December 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago)

Nice.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:17 (twelve years ago)

The Mittster in winter.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

There’s no aide to make his peanut-butter-and-honey sandwiches.

OH HOW SAD FOR YOU.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

By all accounts, the past month has been most difficult on Romney’s wife, Ann, who friends said believed up until the end that ascending to the White House was their destiny. They said she has been crying in private and trying to get back to riding her horses.

Okay seriously, fuck you.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago)

feel like there is an awesome documentary to be made here

iatee, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:25 (twelve years ago)

w/ romney as this larry david type

iatee, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

Over Thanksgiving, one of Romney’s five sons, Josh, his wife and their four children packed into a single bedroom at the Spanish-style villa on Dunemere Drive here. One friend said they ordered their turkey dinner from Boston Market, the home-style restaurant chain, because there were too many kids running around the house to bother with cooking a feast.

Maybe that kitchen photo was Mitt and Ann being all "Hell yeah, no cooking!"

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

If this story is an orchestrated ploy by Romney to elicit sympathy--which it probably is--then yes, embarrassing. But if he's sincerely trying to disappear from view, then whatever delusions of destiny and all of that that he may have entertained, I say just let him fade away in peace.

clemenza, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:36 (twelve years ago)

you certainly are leading the way in letting him go

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:54 (twelve years ago)

in re: Ann Romney sad over being jilted by her destiny. Being the wife of a relentlessly ambitious politician who spends six years running for president must involve embracing a seriously fucked up psychology just to survive the ordeal.

Aimless, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

I've hardly been on the politics thread at all the past 10 days or so; I'm quite sure you've been on here more than I have.

clemenza, Sunday, 2 December 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

Man i really hope Romney gets his car elevator. And takes it straight up his own ass.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 2 December 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, fuck them and their dancing horse. It was clear from the start, and from history, that losing was their destiny.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 2 December 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

Bring on the new messiah.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 December 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago)

GOP fave for Secy of State. "Due process fans, shut up" pays off.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/us/politics/gop-unites-around-john-kerry-for-secretary-of-state.html?_r=0

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 2 December 2012 19:47 (twelve years ago)

“How about Senator Joe Lieberman?” said Senator John Hoeven, Republican of North Dakota, about the retiring Connecticut independent who has often found fault with Mr. Obama’s foreign policy. “What a fabulous choice he would be!”

Tim F, Sunday, 2 December 2012 20:13 (twelve years ago)

little starbursts of joe

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 December 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

Senator John Hoeven, Republican of North Dakota takes seriously the first half of "advice and consent."

Aimless, Sunday, 2 December 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

presently working on a play, "Mitt Romney's First Thanksgiving After Losing the Election" though backers say the title needs work

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 2 December 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

"death of a salesman"

spottieottiespanakopita (schlump), Sunday, 2 December 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

crying ann romney with pretty little horses sold separately is killing me

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 2 December 2012 21:31 (twelve years ago)

Over Thanksgiving, one of Romney’s five sons, Josh, his wife and their four children packed into a single bedroom at the Spanish-style villa on Dunemere Drive here. One friend said they ordered their turkey dinner from Boston Market, the home-style restaurant chain, because there were too many kids running around the house to bother with cooking a feast.

this reminded me to feel depressed about my own thwarted ambition: to publish a children's book called Too Many Grandkids in the White House! that posited Mitt's sheer number of grandchildren would lead to hijinks that eventually resulted in global nuclear war.

sad faces at Terror Castle (reddening), Sunday, 2 December 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

The Liar, The Rich and The Warroom

Tim F, Monday, 3 December 2012 01:02 (twelve years ago)

Kerry favoured by GOP to get Scott Brown back in the Senate,

Gukbe, Monday, 3 December 2012 01:34 (twelve years ago)

"things good for GOP favored by GOP"

iatee, Monday, 3 December 2012 01:38 (twelve years ago)

Bring on the new messiah.

― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, December 2, 2012 12:46 PM (9 hours ago)

Fuck that! Bring on the Dancing Horses!!

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Monday, 3 December 2012 05:29 (twelve years ago)

by the way, the oregon poll worker caught filling in empty ballots with republican choices is saying that she was suffering from a sinus infection and bronchitis at the time of the incident, and the prednisone she took to treat it "screwed up her cognitive thinking."

"She pulled the ballot from me," Swenson said. "I was in total shock. It was as if my mind had slipped. It was as if I was at home filling out my own ballot. It was absolutely unfathomable. It was crazy."

while this is all horseshit, reading it gave me a weird feeling of sympathy disassociation -- like, all you have to do is make a few marks on a paper with a pencil and suddenly you've committed a crime that ruins your life and sends you to jail. it's like that feeling when you're driving near a steep drop-off and you think, "one twitch of the wheel and i am dead."

sad faces at Terror Castle (reddening), Monday, 3 December 2012 13:22 (twelve years ago)

by the way, the oregon poll worker caught filling in empty ballots with republican choices is saying that she was suffering from a sinus infection and bronchitis at the time of the incident, and the prednisone she took to treat it "screwed up her cognitive thinking."

Ha I've taken prednisone a few times and while it may have made me post goofier messages about Doctor Who or whatever, I'm pretty sure committing felonies never crossed my mind.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Monday, 3 December 2012 14:42 (twelve years ago)

well, committing this particular felony, at least

mayor mcpotle (mh), Monday, 3 December 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

man, Veronique de Rugy, one of the Corner's favorite economists, got destroyed by an irate Bruce Bartlett, who at one point actually said "goddamn" on TV.

lol this was so great. the level of disgust - pain, even - on Bartlett's face was priceless.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

link pls!

"Hahahaha, nice one, Punchy," I said. (stevie), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/12/02/former-reaganite-makes-conservative-case-for-raising-taxes/

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

Remember this guy?:

And while Warren insists that he likes both men personally (“I have known them for years!”), he is also clearly unimpressed by either. “I have trained leaders all over the world,” says Warren with uncharacteristic irritation. “Real leaders take the blame and give away the credit.” These two, by contrast, were all about blaming the other guy and blowing their own horns, even when inappropriate. (One example that particularly chafes Warren: the Obama administration’s cooperation in the upcoming movie Zero Dark Thirty, about the killing of Osama bin Laden. “Can you imagine President George W. Bush doing something like that?” he asks.)

Um...yes?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 3 December 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

Meantime:

The conservative news website World Net Daily announced Sunday that former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum will be joining its slate of commentators as an "exclusive columnist."

"How My Creepy Take on Catholicism Convinced Me Obama Was Born in Indonesia"

Ned Raggett, Monday, 3 December 2012 15:23 (twelve years ago)

Warren is all about the agape, and he is a fierce and frequent hugger.

gross

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:24 (twelve years ago)

"Warren is an alien facehugger, depositing his evangelical eggs in visitors via his agape mouth."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 3 December 2012 15:28 (twelve years ago)

the level of disgust - pain, even - on Bartlett's face

he's been rehearsing for years

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago)

too bad the msnbc ghetto is the only place willing to let him ply his craft. apparently dudes like him and Frum have been blackballed from FOX

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 3 December 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

Rick Warren reminds me: I kind of want an ilx contest to see who can take a picture of the most dire book rack at an airport newsstand. I saw a spinner rack at the front of one in Chicago that was 100% inspirational or evangelical books

mh, Monday, 3 December 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

Last time i was at Charlotte it was Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly tomes as far as my eye could see :(((

"Hahahaha, nice one, Punchy," I said. (stevie), Monday, 3 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

Dallas was pretty similar too tbh

"Hahahaha, nice one, Punchy," I said. (stevie), Monday, 3 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

hey josh marshall: your santorum.jpg sucks

http://media.talkingpointsmemo.com/slideshow/2012-election-in-one-photo

before and after broscience (goole), Monday, 3 December 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago)

DOOMSDAY

taxmageddon!
debtocalypse!

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 18:49 (twelve years ago)

Who came up with "doomsday plan?" Was it the Republicans or the press? Was it Trent Lott, who allegedly coined, "nuclear option?"

Are these kids trying to sound like cartoon bad guys?

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Monday, 3 December 2012 19:15 (twelve years ago)

which question should we answer first

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 December 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

wish they could work a ragnarok ref in there somehow

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 20:00 (twelve years ago)

Mitch McConnell's Fourth World

super perv powder (Phil D.), Monday, 3 December 2012 20:07 (twelve years ago)

When Breaks the Budget

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

GOP counter-offer = everything we've heard before

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 20:59 (twelve years ago)

"And here's my counter-offer to your counter-offer"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-ZfahRzz_w

Gukbe, Monday, 3 December 2012 21:16 (twelve years ago)

Intriguing change to Republican strategy floated, I believe that the Republicans will accept middle class tax cut, but nothing else, calling some Democrats on their bluff and pushing everything from tax increases to raising the debt ceiling to 2013, which buys them a lot more leverage.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago)

FISCAL CLIFF HERE WE COOOOME

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 3 December 2012 22:09 (twelve years ago)

excited!!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:16 (twelve years ago)

http://cdx.dexigner.com/news/xw/21247.jpg

woo!

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:35 (twelve years ago)

wish I could find the story I read this weekend in which a GOP congressional aide expressed dumbfoundment that this time Obama wasn't yielding so quickly.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago)

Another way to rephrase what I posted above...Republicans presently weighing whether they can live with these two outcomes:

1) economic recovery sabotaged, we get blamed, but:
2) Obama spends another four years digging out, leaves office diminished

I think they can.

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago)

why would anyone care about Obama's rep besides O at this stage

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago)

Love the implicit confidence that they'll have a candidate Americans will actually like and vote for the next time around.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago)

http://comedycentral.mtvnimages.com/images/shows/indecision/gallery/Ryan_Sad/sad-1.jpg

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:50 (twelve years ago)

we all know who the frontrunners are already, but they're deeply flawed - gonna be Hillary's to lose imho

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:51 (twelve years ago)

why would anyone care about Obama's rep besides O at this stage

Because my own opinion is that most Republicans truly despise Obama--even more so after reelection. We've discussed this before, and I know many people here disagree (and believe they despised Clinton more). Making sure Obama leaves office with a struggling economy, even if they're the root cause, will "prove," in their minds, they were right all along about all the socialist nonsense.

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 22:55 (twelve years ago)

when has the GOP ever worried about being right about anything

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago)

they care about being in power more than that

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago)

more than anything, really

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 22:58 (twelve years ago)

In terms of "We told you this alien guy doesn't understand the way this country works," I think they'd like to be proven right. An economy that rights itself won't do that. We'll see--if they come to an agreement, I'm wrong.

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:00 (twelve years ago)

(I'm also working under the assumption that all the gerrymandering at the House level has mostly solved the staying-in-power problem--everything I'm saying here refers to the House, not the Senate.)

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:01 (twelve years ago)

There's a theory that going over the cliff, while bad in the short term (employment, recession, Federal freezes) will get the ball rolling paying down the deficit, which will be good in the long term.

Though writing that, I have no clue why the Republicans wouldn't want to go over the cliff. Simply to avoid raising taxes on the rich? That can't be right, can it?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:08 (twelve years ago)

military cuts!

Mordy, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:10 (twelve years ago)

Krugman:

Oh, boy. This isn’t going to end, even when or if a deal is reached on defusing the austerity bomb; John Boehner has just declared that he’s going to hold the full faith and credit of the United States hostage every time we hit the debt limit. Nor will it be a case of holding the nation at gunpoint until it meets GOP demands; Republicans are signaling that they don’t intend to make any specific proposals, they’re just going to yell and stamp their feet until Obama soothes them somehow.

So this is going to be nightmarish, unless Obama surrenders — which I don’t think he will (because he shouldn’t).

And one thing to think about: if the next two years are, as they seem likely to be, one long Republican tantrum, the 2014 election is not going to be a normal midterm. It will instead be a referendum on GOP obstructionism, which may attract a lot more attention — and much higher turnout — than normal.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:12 (twelve years ago)

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121203095345-john-boehner-conference-t1-main.jpg

CNN: "House GOP has fiscal cliff counteroffer" which, I guess, "he can't refuse," judging by this picture.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:21 (twelve years ago)

And one thing to think about: if the next two years are, as they seem likely to be, one long Republican tantrum, the 2014 election is not going to be a normal midterm. It will instead be a referendum on GOP obstructionism, which may attract a lot more attention — and much higher turnout — than normal.

but...the 2009-2010 GOP was no less obstructionist, and iirc 90% of the voting public had no clue and somehow a bunch of stupid white men in 1700s costumes dominated

Z S, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:25 (twelve years ago)

it would be referendum on obstructionism if the media covered fairly, but only leftist blogs are calling it like it is. everywhere else just covers the fiscal cliff bullshit like "democrats and republicans just can't come to an agreement! republicans prefer tax cuts and democrats prefer tax increases! there's just no solution here and both sides are equally to blame!"

Z S, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:27 (twelve years ago)

Well, tbf, if Barry Hussein would just cave they wouldn't HAVE to be so obstructionist. Duh.

HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 3 December 2012 23:28 (twelve years ago)

tbh I don't know why clemenza's worried

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 December 2012 23:33 (twelve years ago)

takes a worried man etc

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 December 2012 23:37 (twelve years ago)

Where did I say I was worried? I'm observing, from another country. (Although mine will be affected.)

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:38 (twelve years ago)

hold the phone, there's a republican counteroffer on the table!

800 billion in new revenue and 1.2 in spending cuts over 10 years!

wow, wonder where that new revenue is coming from, i bet the gop has some good ideas on this front let's just check the deets so that-

Under the Republican offer, tax revenue would rise by $800 billion over 10 years, through closing loopholes and ending or curtailing deductions and tax credits. Mr. Boehner did not specify on Monday which tax breaks would be curtailed.

oh.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/us/politics/boehner-counters-obamas-proposal-on-deficit-cuts.html

Z S, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:41 (twelve years ago)

but...the 2009-2010 GOP was no less obstructionist, and iirc 90% of the voting public had no clue and somehow a bunch of stupid white men in 1700s costumes dominated

Maybe it'll be like the re-relection of George Bush: it took a couple of years for the population to realize what a horrible mistake it had made.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:42 (twelve years ago)

xpost Ha. "You know that candidate that ran against you and lost? Well, we're just going to put forward his rejected plan, replete with non-specifics."

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago)

Paul Ryan clarified all that two months ago on one of the Sunday morning shows, when he said the math works, he just didn't have time to go through it all.

clemenza, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:45 (twelve years ago)

If the GOP cared more about being in power than being right, they'd be in power.

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 3 December 2012 23:46 (twelve years ago)

And they don't really care about being right, so much as being right-wing.

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Monday, 3 December 2012 23:55 (twelve years ago)

If the GOP cared more about being in power than being right, they'd be in power.

not exactly - their power-base is diminished and they don't know how to expand it

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:00 (twelve years ago)

The White House dismissed a "fiscal cliff" proposal from congressional Republicans that included tax reforms and spending cuts on Monday, saying it did not meet President Barack Obama's pledge to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans.

"The Republican letter released today does not meet the test of balance. In fact, it actually promises to lower rates for the wealthy and sticks the middle class with the bill," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said in a statement, referring to a proposal laid out in a letter by House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans.

"Their plan includes nothing new and provides no details on which deductions they would eliminate, which loopholes they will close or which Medicare savings they would achieve. Independent analysts who have looked at plans like this one have concluded that middle class taxes will have to go up to pay for lower rates for millionaires and billionaires," Pfeiffer said.

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:04 (twelve years ago)

And yet...and yet...even in the darkest hour, hope springs eternal.

http://cdn.tweetwood.com/images/celeb/712/94/16g3dw/wolfblitzer-g47x-300x300.jpg

clemenza, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago)

that whatever building their both standing in is about to collapse?

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:13 (twelve years ago)

they're

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:13 (twelve years ago)

The guy on the right--looks like someone we know.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_F5fY63LECJY/SOK9WDbQM3I/AAAAAAAAAgM/REmi-vVCl0M/s400/blog+Pileggi+two+dogs.jpg

clemenza, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:21 (twelve years ago)

Is that Warren Ellis?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:23 (twelve years ago)

gonna be Hillary's to lose imho

OK I'm pondering a cash figure on this shit.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:24 (twelve years ago)

The guy on the right--looks like someone we know.

hahahahaha

and I scream Fieri Eiffel Tower High (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:39 (twelve years ago)

The election: it never ends.

Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago)

Why not start now?

― g@bbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:04 PM (7 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Because I want to see how the 2006 Congressional elections play out first.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:09 PM (7 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This Jesus fellow's name keeps popping up from the Republicans.

― Huk-L, Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:09 PM (7 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I don't think either side has a magic candidate, barring McCain who doesn't really belong to his side, at least at the moment. But perhaps such candidates are made rather than born. And Karl Rove presumably will be making someone by early 2007 at the latest.

But part of me looks at the wide-open-on-both-sides landscape and says candidates are only as good as how they stack up against a given opponent, i.e. some people will look better or worse depending on who is on the other side. I wonder if one party will end up picking their candidate with an opponent in mind, or if both parties will end up in a game of chicken. Perhaps this is an amateur's perspective - maybe you go with the best guy (ahem) and wait for the Veep selection to start making comparisons.

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, June 2, 2005 2:11 PM (7 years ago)

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 01:30 (twelve years ago)

"Game of chicken" sums up Obama's presidency in a nutshell, sadly

Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 01:33 (twelve years ago)

Veronique, it turns out, had a good time!

I was on Up with Chris Hayes yesterday morning to talk about the fiscal cliff and the states’ budget crisis. I have to say, I really enjoyed the show. I thought Chris Hayes was a really thoughtful host, and the format of his show allows for real conversations between people who do not agree on everything (or even on most things). Joining me on the show were Governor Dan Malloy of Connecticut; Elizabeth Pearson of the Roosevelt Institute;Dedrick Muhammed of the NAACP, whose company I really enjoyed; and economist Bruce Bartlett joined us remotely from DC.

We talked a lot about raising revenue, of course. As you know, I would rather talk about restraining the growth of spending, since I believe that the path to prosperity requires a smaller government. I also find it incredibly unfair to continue kicking the fiscal can down the road, letting our children deal with the consequences. But I thought Hayes was really interesting on the issue of taxes. In his introduction, he made a point that you don’t hear often on MSNBC or on the left in general: While taxes ill likely go up on the top income earners soon, taxes will also need to go up on everyone else next

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 02:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.openculture.com/2012/12/celebrity_statistician_nate_silver_fields_questions_from_data_wizards_at_google.html

man nate silver really is an awkward dude

iatee, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 03:36 (twelve years ago)

saw clinton speak today. as a charmer he's really something

k3vin k., Tuesday, 4 December 2012 03:56 (twelve years ago)

did he think you were a chick and hit on you

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 04:01 (twelve years ago)

he looks much older than his 66 years, especially with the glasses on

k3vin k., Tuesday, 4 December 2012 04:19 (twelve years ago)

high-mileage

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 04:20 (twelve years ago)

not exactly - their power-base is diminished and they don't know how to expand it

They know plenty well how to expand it, but it involves turning away from the crazy - stay one foot to the right of the Democrats, with a shit economy and a black incumbent, is as solid a recipe for success as they could ever wish for.

Their base is just the overlap of different binaries, but it's the way they went about things that made theirs an intersection rather than a union. I mean sure you get the straight white males and the Dems get the gay latina women, but you can play to get the gay white males / straight latina men / straight while women / etc IF you don't smile benevolently on people when they start talking crazy about the gays / immigants / magical vaginas.

I've probably said before, but one of the strangest things I heard this election cycle was someone on Fox News talking about how, well, Republicans are just the party that contains a lot of different views on things and has a healthy (read: rabid) level of internal debate and that's just how we roll. I mean, that was always the Democrat's bag (and generally got them dick all), and at least they had an actual ethos that supported this!

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 11:49 (twelve years ago)

YES.

Most news accounts of budget negotiations between the White House and Congress focus on two men: President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner. The man who ran on a platform of “balanced” deficit reduction, and the man who represents the party that refuses to increase taxes on high earners.

But there’s a third agent, quietly keeping the negotiating center of gravity in Democrats’ comfort zone.

On Tuesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will file what’s known as a discharge petition — a procedural tool that will increase pressure on Republicans to allow Bush tax cuts for top earners to expire. If 218 members sign the petition, legislation to permanently extend middle-income tax cuts will get a vote, and Republicans will be on the spot. Leadership aides expect nearly every Democrat will put pen to paper in support of it, and then push squishy Republicans to break with leadership and sign it as well.

That reflects half of Pelosi’s role. The other half is subtler. As the controller of an overwhelming number of Democratic votes, she’s there to warn all negotiators, including Obama himself, not to cut a bad deal.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago)

cool

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/04/elizabeth-warren-banking-committee_n_2236898.html

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago)

Pelosi possibly the only person I've ever felt proud to repeatedly vote for

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

Hm. A cool thread idea?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:02 (twelve years ago)

would basically come down to who likes their rep/senator the most? surely no one's ever actually enjoyed voting for the same presidential candidate twice lol

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:12 (twelve years ago)

Gus Hall, the people's choice.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago)

how 'bout those Stevenson voters?

xpost

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

Keith Ellison and Al Franken: I'm def OK with them. Yvette D Clarke: all I know about her is that she is a Democrat and she goofed up proper on the Colbert Report.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:46 (twelve years ago)

Somehow, I doubt there's anyone on ILX who voted for Nixon in '60, '68, and '72. Or if so, they're not particularly proud of it.

and I scream Fieri Eiffel Tower High (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/12/04/republicans-losing-blame-game-on-fiscal-cliff/?hpid=z1

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

And whiners whine:

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rep-huelskamp-r-ks-gop-wants-to-purge?ref=fpb

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

A new poll finds that 49% of Republican voters nationally think that ACORN stole the election for President Obama.

ACORN!

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:36 (twelve years ago)

Ashley Judd may run for the senate:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/onpolitics/2012/12/04/ashley-judd-senate-mcconnell-kentucky/1746185/

Hank Kingsley will need to be brought out of retirement so he can introduce her as "the Judd" at rallies.

clemenza, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:49 (twelve years ago)

both McConnell and Paul are on my short list of Senators i'd most like to see booted out. nice going, Kentucky.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:53 (twelve years ago)

how many states boast two loathsome senators?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:56 (twelve years ago)

Q14 In the last presidential election, did you vote for
Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?
Barack Obama 51%
................................................
Mitt Romney 42%
....................................................
Someone else/Don't remember
8%

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 23:58 (twelve years ago)

I am the 8%

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:00 (twelve years ago)

SOUTH CAROLINA

xposts

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:00 (twelve years ago)

I suspect Idaho or Utah should be in the runing.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:02 (twelve years ago)

ha without googling i only know one by name in each.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:05 (twelve years ago)

Need a note from your mother before booking:

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/report_karl_rove_dick_morris_pushed_to_sidelines_at_fox_news/

clemenza, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 01:55 (twelve years ago)

obama on bloomberg saying that the republican offer "just doesn't work," whereupon the interviewer asks twice, sternly, like someone who's seen hard-hitting journalists in movies, what it's "going to take" for obama and boehner to "sit down in a room together", possibly with beer, unless i'm getting my perniciously meaningless political cliches mixed up. to obama's great credit he says "i don't think it's a question of sitting in a room."

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 07:42 (twelve years ago)

http://www.samefacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Benen-Republican-offer1.jpeg

super perv powder (Phil D.), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 11:53 (twelve years ago)

Liz Fowler, Obamacare sleazeball

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/05/obamacare-fowler-lobbyist-industry1

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 13:18 (twelve years ago)

That disabilities smack down was shameful

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 13:22 (twelve years ago)

It was disgusting, and their excuses for rejecting it were fairly ridiculous. The government was not going to swoop in and impose restrictions on home schoolers.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 13:27 (twelve years ago)

Too bad, so sad, etc.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 14:06 (twelve years ago)

The following day, Rove appeared on Fox News, charging that Obama's victory was a product of the president's ability to suppress the vote.

uuuuugh, somehow i missed that. pretty incredible thing to say. is it possible that rove is somehow ignorant of the purpose of all the voter ID shit that his own party relentlessly pushed last year? or...ok yeah, he's just full of shit.

depresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 14:09 (twelve years ago)

"Karl Rove's familiar 2012 presence on Fox News appears to be coming to a halt."

^ is this sentence janky or is it me?

Guy was knee-deep in water (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 14:14 (twelve years ago)

UN disability treaty vote was disgusting.

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 14:33 (twelve years ago)

yeah, just read about that today. it would be really nice if Americans with disabilities would remember this next time elections come around. i realize that the vote was on ratifying the UN treaty and wouldn't have an effect on the rights of disabled people established in the 1990 ADA. but i'm preeeeeetty sure that disabled people would be pretty disgusted with this vote.

54 million Americans have disabilities, and about 650 million people worldwide.

depresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

the way npr described it is that the US treaty is modeled on the ADA! fucking crazy people.

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

er whoops the UN treaty

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:16 (twelve years ago)

yeah, it was basically meant to just extend the ADA to the rest of the world

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

but disabled people across the world will understand that they can't have wheelchair ramps because of the rights of homeschooled kids in utah

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)

i always wonder if the GOP is truly insane or if it's all just a political calculation. obviously it's a bit of both, but recently i had thought that it leaned more toward the calculation. but shit like today...no...they're just insane. wtf

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

a) really do think the UN is going to come into their homes (true belief)
b) know there is always good political angle in UN paranoia, no matter how loopy (cynicism)
c) swim in waters where UN paranoia & US/personal sovereignty are ideas way more weighty and serious than international cooperation (culture, ideology)

i lean c.

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

many of the people I know who vote GOP do earnestly believe that the UN is going to come into their homes

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:30 (twelve years ago)

and yet I'm the one who spurs your impulsive donations?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:31 (twelve years ago)

They are much easier to ignore

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:33 (twelve years ago)

yeah the anti-UN people are way into that Glenn Beck Agenda 21 shit

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:33 (twelve years ago)

oh, definitely. my dad believes that.

i'm trying to find a list of UN Treaties that the U.S. has ratified over the last ten years. i was hoping there'd be other treaties that we've ratified (proving that in the past enough senators were able to overcome their conspiracy theories about the UN) and it would highlight the absurdity of the particular vote. unfortunately, i can't seem to find any sort of chronological list of treaties.

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41zD2aMoihL.jpg

fear of a blue helmet

Euler, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

i've had to research UN docs for my job before, it's a fucking nightmare

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago)

they have a nice big searchable database. it's just lacking a simple chronological list of treaties that have been ratified by particular countries, afaict

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

if i thought the UN had any actual ability to enforce any of the things they pass + say i'd be much more sympathetic to ppl being concerned about them

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

UN peacekeepers are going to bust into assisted living facilities and throw grandma off her wheelchair

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

I don't understand living with the cognitive dissonance necessary to believe that the UN is a wholly useless, ineffectual organization that is on the brink of taking over the US and turning it into a puppet nation whose wealth is pillaged to support the rest of the world

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

I don't understand living with the cognitive dissonance necessary to believe that the UN is a wholly useless, ineffectual organization that is on the brink of taking over the US and turning it into a puppet nation whose wealth is pillaged to support the rest of the world

Ta-dah

http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/articles/2012/11/29/glenn-beck-s-obama-pee-stunt-shows-he-s-still-in-populist-huckster-game/_jcr_content/body/inlineimage.img.503.jpg/1354196121278.cached.jpg

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

yeah, obv only this part is true: "the UN is a wholly useless, ineffectual organization"

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

I know!

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

yeah but see if we join forces with the UN their ineffectiveness and our military might will make us unstoppable!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

xpost
oh, i know the answer to that.

it's kind of like spacetime and teleportation. it's not like you're traveling across the universe in a blink of an eye. it's more like the spacetime fabric of the universe is bending so that the other part of the universe is touching your current location. the UN is the massive force that bends space and enables two apparently contradicting viewpoints to coalesce into one worldview

http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/maplib/images_maplib/unflag.gif
http://rrrgroup.homestead.com/fabric5.jpg

caek will back me up on all this

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

Racism, for example. Žižek recommends that we look for symptomatic contradictions, as when the anti-Semite claims that the Jews are both arch-capitalist exploiters and Bolshevik subversives, that they are both excessively tied to their overly particular tradition and deracinated cosmopolitans undercutting national traditions. In the Jim Crow South, blacks were presented simultaneously as childlike innocents needing the guidance of whites and as brutal sexual predators. In contemporary America, Mexican immigrants are viewed at once as lay-abouts burdening our social welfare system and as relentless workaholics who are stealing all our jobs.

These contradictions don’t show that ideology is “irrational” — the problem is exactly the opposite, that there are too many reasons supporting their views. Žižek argues that these piled-up rationalizations demonstrate that something else is going on.

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

koan for idiots: how does a useless organization take over the world

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

Not an Onion headline:

Rubio Clarifies: The Earth Is 4.5 Billion Years Old

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

Pope Clarifies: Garden of Eden built over the course of 4.499999 billion years

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

These contradictions don’t show that ideology is “irrational” — the problem is exactly the opposite, that there are too many reasons supporting their views.

Have I been laboring under a false definition of "irrational", I mean isn't the inherent conflict between these competing viewpoints the dictionary definition of irrationality, and furthermore said irrationality is, as the quote states, a mask to shield the holder of said contradictory opinions from confronting their prejudices?

If the point is "telling irrational people they are being irrational makes them more irrational", then just say that and don't intimate that they are actually being super rational by earnestly believing baldly conflicting statements/ideas.

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

he's using "irrational" (in scare quotes) to mean "without reason"

max, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

Hillary Clarifies: "Settlements" Will Not Pass My Lips

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago)

as usual the western world looks like the other place i'd want to live ^

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

the only* place, rather

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/hillaryandsuha.jpg

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

I really want to know more about Chile; I know little aside from its existence but every time I notice it popping up somewhere it's usually in the context of "Chile: secretly South America's most advanced country"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

never forget, eh. who fucking cares.
xp

waiting on Does Something About Corruption map.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

who knew botswana was doing okay???

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:34 (twelve years ago)

i read fairly frequently that botswana is a well-goverened and growing country

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

waiting on Does Something About Corruption map.

lol presumably same map dumbass

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

I really want to know more about Chile; I know little aside from its existence but every time I notice it popping up somewhere it's usually in the context of "Chile: secretly South America's most advanced country"

great wine too. I know plenty of Argetines and Chileans. Uruguay HOWEVER...

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

http://fortunewallstreet.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/henry_kissinger.jpg

"yessssss, the wine ist great in Chile, no?"

Euler, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

http://www.atbreak.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/URUGUAY.jpg

super perv powder (Phil D.), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

fuck you Mordy

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:40 (twelve years ago)

you know what happens if you don't do anything about corruption? you get more of it.

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:42 (twelve years ago)

Obama 2012

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

United States: worst country on earth. besides almost all the other ones.

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/04/israel-nukes-palestine-un-vote-rogue

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

oh man, almost the entire world disagrees with israel? how did that happen? i do think it's nice that russia and china found time in their busy human rights violating schedules* to vote for palestinian statehood tho!

* which for russia includes arming assad with military helicopters w/ which to kill civilian protestors

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

i wonder when china will get around to voting for tibetan statehood. i'm sure next week or something?

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

not a bad analogy really

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:56 (twelve years ago)

who stinketh the most suuuuuuuuch a fun game

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:05 (twelve years ago)

iyo which of these countries is the worst to live in right now

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:09 (twelve years ago)

i kno, it's only fun talking about which country is the worst when it's a country filled with jews

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:10 (twelve years ago)

feel like the uk has lo self esteem, sort of a downer - america on the other hand is just out of its fucking mind

― ice cr?m, Monday, August 8, 2011 8:52 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

beef richards (Mr. Que), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:11 (twelve years ago)

lols

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:50 (twelve years ago)

Ed Rogers (from Shakey's link): "But sometimes I believe the people’s will and the public good may not be the same thing."

Gee, Ed, didja ever notice how when you think like that, it usually turns out that it's you who knows what's good for us, but for some damn reason we, the people, disagree with you?

Aimless, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

it's almost like he's some kind of coastal elitist

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

quel surprise

Force Boxman (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago)

He's making an argument for governing by conscience and principle, which we all agree with, especially when our views are unpopular.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:13 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/Az3Ar.gif

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

lolll

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 20:12 (twelve years ago)

oh man, almost the entire world disagrees with israel? how did that happen? i do think it's nice that russia and china found time in their busy human rights violating schedules* to vote for palestinian statehood tho!

* which for russia includes arming assad with military helicopters w/ which to kill civilian protestors

― Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:52 (4 hours ago) Permalink

wow russia and china don't have great human rights records ur blowing my mind

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:17 (twelve years ago)

i can't wait for angela merkel to compare the national socialist occupation of berlin with the israeli occupation of east jerusalem

Mordy, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

You score enough Human Rights Points, you get a free pass on flying death robots.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:45 (twelve years ago)

let he who is without human rights violations cast the first stone

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:50 (twelve years ago)

*rolls a d20 for initiative*

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:52 (twelve years ago)

Meantime this makes complete sewaitaminute

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/glenn-beck-vince-vaughn-to-launch-reality-tv-show-151146.html?hp=r1

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 22:01 (twelve years ago)

Jojy Alex · Top Commenter · Staten Island, New York
Hey Vince...say good-bye to your already crappy acting career!
Reply · 12 · Like · Follow Post · 4 hours ago

Pat Will
...and hello to an awe inspiring experience and career!
Reply · 61 · Like · 3 hours ago

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 22:05 (twelve years ago)

hoping for ep where beck shoots someone's eye out in bb gun stunt

Hunt3r, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 22:25 (twelve years ago)

how would either US stop this exactly?

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 December 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

er or NATO

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 December 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

if there was an intervention in libya i don't see how there won't be one now, especially after obama called it a red line

Mordy, Thursday, 6 December 2012 00:43 (twelve years ago)

also, you've gotta ask - do you want NATO handling it now or Turkey and Israel handling it?

Mordy, Thursday, 6 December 2012 00:46 (twelve years ago)

Watching Scarboroughfair and Chuck Todd chortle over GOP "leverage" this morning – if Boehner concedes on raising tax rates, then the GOP doesn't have to concede anything else – made me vomit in my mouth.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 December 2012 13:45 (twelve years ago)

Demint out?

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2012/12/06/jim-demint-leaving-the-senate/

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

huh.

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

rip big man

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

Congress getting scarier by the month

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

more money in super pacs

Guy was knee-deep in water (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

This thread needs the final scene from Nightmare on Elm Street2

Raymond Cummings, Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:47 (twelve years ago)

more money in super pacs

you mean 'more to advance the cause of freedom and liberty in Congress'

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

yes i spoke poorly

Guy was knee-deep in water (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

Chris Chocola?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

Have we heard from Rep Dolores Booburry yet?

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 6 December 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

Gotta love Erickson and RedState:

While my initial reaction was one of sadness that we are losing the clearest voice in the Senate for conservatives, the upside on Jim DeMint’s departure from the Senate is mind boggling. Mitch McConnell likes it when people compare McConnell to Darth Vader, seemingly clueless that Vader lost the Death Star twice to a rag tag group of rebels in really beat up, hand-me-down spaceships.

If McConnell smiles at hearing the news Jim DeMint is leaving the Senate, he should remember Obi Wan Kenobi telling him . . . errrr . . . Darth Vader, “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.” Jim DeMint’s power in the conservative movement just grew exponentially. A man who was going to retire in four years anyway, will now be leading the conservative movement from its base of operations for years to come.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 December 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

Oh and:

About the only thing that could make this more awesome is if Governor Nikki Haley ensures the Senate’s only black Senator is a conservative Republican who presently represents the congressional district in which Ft. Sumter sits.

Yes OF COURSE.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 December 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

i wonder what this is really about and i can count on erickson to not know

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 6 December 2012 16:04 (twelve years ago)

what on EARTH is Erickson on about – is he doing Rove's GOP math?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 December 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

On January 3, 2011, Human Events named Jim DeMint the “conservative of the year.” I had the distinct privilege of writing the summation of the honor.

hero

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

get ready everybody

#SenatorTimScott

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 6 December 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

gops new hero of tokenism to form a triumvirate with rubio and jindal

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:39 (twelve years ago)

haha you fell right into their trap!

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:40 (twelve years ago)

mitt was more wasp-y than clinton or dole even if he was not technically a wasp

iatee, Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:47 (twelve years ago)

oops wrong politix thread

iatee, Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:47 (twelve years ago)

owpt for short, saves a lot of typing 'round these parts

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 6 December 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

Chris Chocola?

― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, December 6, 2012 7:53 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Have we heard from Rep Dolores Booburry yet?

Chocola jokes never get old--they always spring up at the right time

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 6 December 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2012/12/06/evangelicals-vs-persons-with-disabilities-the-real-dangers-of-fighting-against-imaginary-monsters/

The US Senate voted today on ratifying the UN Convention on the Rights of Disabled People 61-38, but the majority fell short of the 66 votes needed for ratification. The 38 votes against came from Republican senators, most of whom signed a letter promising not to support the bill. The letter was organized by Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who said the treaty threatened US sovereignty and could force the parents of disabled children to send them to public schools. It drew the support of home-schoolers who also fretted that the treaty was, among other things, a sly way to force America to adopt laws enshrining “abortion rights, homosexual rights, and demands the complete disarmament of all people.”

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Thursday, 6 December 2012 20:08 (twelve years ago)

that last part is true but they misread; the treaty demands that every American citizen have their arms pulled off by stampeding cattle

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Thursday, 6 December 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago)

"Well, that's the end of this suit!"

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Thursday, 6 December 2012 21:03 (twelve years ago)

Through the Vatican?

and I scream Fieri Eiffel Tower High (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 6 December 2012 21:07 (twelve years ago)

Bizarre that DeMint is leaving mid-term. idgi really

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 December 2012 21:12 (twelve years ago)

guessing the phrase "shit tons of money" plays into it somehow

(alternatively, “Respec’”) (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 December 2012 21:15 (twelve years ago)

I like how someone leaving office is always spun by their lickspittles as them somehow gaining more power

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Thursday, 6 December 2012 22:12 (twelve years ago)

When they leave Congress to become lobbyists, they get to start writing legislation!

Aimless, Thursday, 6 December 2012 22:29 (twelve years ago)

good riddance to that asshole, obviously

k3vin k., Thursday, 6 December 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago)

DeMint now joking about "firing" Boehner lol

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 December 2012 00:38 (twelve years ago)

I want this to happen so bad

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/marc-sanford-considering-bid-to-replace-demint

Ned Raggett, Friday, 7 December 2012 03:29 (twelve years ago)

there's a U.S. Congressman whose last name is ... CHOCOLA!

get it on smang a gong (Eisbaer), Friday, 7 December 2012 04:09 (twelve years ago)

he was a showgirl

Mordy, Friday, 7 December 2012 04:09 (twelve years ago)

http://media.theonion.com/images/articles/article/648/onion_news1568_jpg_250x1000_q85.jpg

get it on smang a gong (Eisbaer), Friday, 7 December 2012 04:10 (twelve years ago)

p4reene notes that Jon Stewart sucks:

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/alan_simpson_spins_jon_stewart/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 December 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

Should have put something real on the line, like his eyebrows.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 December 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

I don't get it--didn't his guy win?

clemenza, Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:24 (twelve years ago)

is Axelrod getting waterboarded

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:26 (twelve years ago)

I think Joe backed out and he agreed to do it if enough people donated to charity or something

Gukbe, Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:28 (twelve years ago)

Did it for an epilepsy charity, I think?

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:33 (twelve years ago)

yeah he has a daughter with epilepsy, promised to shave it if they raised a million bucks for epilepsy before the end of the year iirc.

Clay, Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:38 (twelve years ago)

That's a nice story. I was confused, because I remember a mustache-related bet (with Royce Pumpkinhead or someone) pertaining to the election.

clemenza, Saturday, 8 December 2012 00:42 (twelve years ago)

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/07/crists-political-hat-trick-former-gop-governor-independent-candidate-announces-switch-to-dem/?hpt=hp_t3

what a shocking surprise

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Saturday, 8 December 2012 15:35 (twelve years ago)

neither is this:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/07/crists-to-marry-male-trick-announces-switch-to-dem/?hpt=hp_t3

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 8 December 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago)

Corey Curtis, who fathered the children with six women, has been behind on child support payments and was ordered by a judge on Monday to not have any more kids until he could pay for them.

Curtis owes nearly $100,000 in back child support and interest, according to Racine County prosecutors.

In sentencing the 44-year-old father Monday in Racine County Circuit Court for failing to pay support, Judge Tim Boyle lamented that he didn't have the authority to order sterilization for Curtis.

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Saturday, 8 December 2012 18:44 (twelve years ago)

^^ Would provide entertaining grounds for issuing a bench warrant for contempt of court.

Aimless, Saturday, 8 December 2012 19:11 (twelve years ago)

did we already do this?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/fox-newss-jesse-watters-trashed-obama-voters-donated-151387.html

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 8 December 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

lol, everything about this election seems summed up by "Positively 4th Street," esp. "you just want to be on the side that's winning."

WilliamC, Saturday, 8 December 2012 19:33 (twelve years ago)

That's incredible; Watters is probably the sleaziest and most scornful person on the network aside from Gutfeld.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 December 2012 21:43 (twelve years ago)

just drives home (as if it was needed) that these dudes are actors

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 8 December 2012 21:54 (twelve years ago)

guys like Hannity are certainly just playing a role, but actually going all the way to giving money to Obama is next level and probably will really hurt his career now that it's come out.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 December 2012 22:37 (twelve years ago)

http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/press-fear-obama-private-swearing-in-84776.html

“Call me shell-shocked. I’m stunned that this is even an issue; it boggles the mind,” NBC News White House correspondent Chuck Todd told POLITICO. “This is not their oath, this is the constitutional oath. It’s not for them. It’s for the public, the citizens of the United Sates. It just boggles the mind — How is this even a debate?”

LOL chill out bro

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 December 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago)

yeah i don't know how OReilly can keep him on staff

xpost

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 8 December 2012 22:46 (twelve years ago)

re swearing in - obv that Obamao is going to take the oath w/ Qu'ran

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 8 December 2012 22:49 (twelve years ago)

I'm sorry Miami inflicted Chuck Todd on the rest of you lot

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 8 December 2012 22:52 (twelve years ago)

a friend recently FB-posted that Todd is 'a god' to him....

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 9 December 2012 06:03 (twelve years ago)

Chuck Godd

pplains, Sunday, 9 December 2012 06:09 (twelve years ago)

Hillar-ious NYT homepage feature tease: "Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to be a figure of nearly limitless possibility..."

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 9 December 2012 06:28 (twelve years ago)

thought you didn't want to talk about 2016 morbs!

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Sunday, 9 December 2012 07:26 (twelve years ago)

we're not, we're talking about LIMITLESS POSSIBILITY

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 9 December 2012 14:58 (twelve years ago)

http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/theticket/mitt-ann-romney-knockout.jpg

pplains, Monday, 10 December 2012 05:23 (twelve years ago)

LIMITLESS POSSIBILITY

Well, you must remember that Hillary was the first person ever to climb Mt.Everest!

Aimless, Monday, 10 December 2012 05:27 (twelve years ago)

that's what bill calls it

iatee, Monday, 10 December 2012 05:28 (twelve years ago)

this guy?

http://www.mrbill.com/TVparty%20Mr_%20Bill%20Creator%20Walter%20Williams%20interview_files/MrBill1.jpg

Aimless, Monday, 10 December 2012 05:31 (twelve years ago)

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8rnaY4CMAIbf76.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 10 December 2012 07:27 (twelve years ago)

Cheerios from a CVS is not cost-effective. Disappointed in a Mitt.

Gukbe, Monday, 10 December 2012 07:32 (twelve years ago)

Has he cut his trousers into crude, lopsided shorts? Is this the face of a meltdown, standing in store with 'hip' clothes his wife made for him, trying to remember why he's holding boxes of cereal?

the so-called socialista (dowd), Monday, 10 December 2012 09:01 (twelve years ago)

is that a chickfila logo on his polo?

shave and a haircut...2 CHAINZ (m bison), Monday, 10 December 2012 11:57 (twelve years ago)

let's see, cheerios, a 16-pack of AAA batteries, milk, coffee filters, yogurt, mustard, doritos....and a six-pack of beer. i'm gonna need to see your ID mr. romney

dexpresso (Z S), Monday, 10 December 2012 14:09 (twelve years ago)

I think Romney's reliving the Larry Sanders episode where Hank goes off the rails after his divorce (a very mild, millionaire Mormon version of that).

clemenza, Monday, 10 December 2012 14:14 (twelve years ago)

i kind of like how everywhere he is

before and after broscience (goole), Monday, 10 December 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

From that boxing article:

In came Mitt Romney. Yes, that Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor and the presidential runner-up, every hair on his head in place. Romney, in fact, came in twice. His introduction was at once awkward and hilarious.

"Hi, Manny," he said. "I'm Mitt Romney. I ran for president. I lost."

"I got hit by a punch I didn't see," said Pacquiao.

pplains, Monday, 10 December 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

"what's your excuse?"

Andrew Farrell, Monday, 10 December 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

I ran for president. I lost.

I hope he uses this line as his sole greeting for the next decade. He probably thinks it is endearingly humble, instead of uncloseted dysfunctionality.

Aimless, Monday, 10 December 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

is that a chickfila logo on his polo

haha looks like it's OLE MISS!

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 10 December 2012 18:56 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Why does Mitt have on an Ole Miss shirt?

Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 December 2012 19:00 (twelve years ago)

iirc his body man was an ole miss grad

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 10 December 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

a thought question in weekly sift (http://weeklysift.com/2012/12/10/radical/) caught my attention. what do you think?

If they all met in the same room, which conservatives do you think would be calling the shots: officeholders like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner? or people who never face the voters, like Rupert Murdoch, David Koch, Karl Rove, Grover Norquist, and Rush Limbaugh?

DeMint is trying to move up in the real power structure, the one with no visible org chart. And that means leaving the Senate behind.

dexpresso (Z S), Monday, 10 December 2012 22:20 (twelve years ago)

i guess it's just interesting to me to think about someone like limbaugh and mcconnell actually having a conversation.

dexpresso (Z S), Monday, 10 December 2012 22:21 (twelve years ago)

Can Obama hold on and not give in to Republican and mainstream media calls for Medicare and Medicaid cuts and age-raising (and to his own grand bargain from last year)

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago)

I've stopped paying attention to Rush. Does anyone have a sense of whether his influence is waning or waxing?

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

There are thinkers on the Left who recognize that unchecked, middle class entitlement growth, and in particular Medicare/Medicaid, will eat into every other progressive priority (welfare/housing, education, environmental protection). The political problem is pinning blame for the changes on the other team.

Federal taxes can go higher. In 2012 they're at 15.4% of GDP and they topped out at 20.9% in 1944, when the top marginal rate was 95%. The fly in the ointment is that Federal expenditures are at 22.7%, or more as a percentage of GDP than taxation has ever raised. And things get worse going forward.

http://i49.tinypic.com/257jatj.png

The tax increases in any deal will provide political cover for the wonks to rein in Medicare/Medicaid. If not now, than the next administration. "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop."

Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:43 (twelve years ago)

This view:

There are thinkers on the Left who recognize that unchecked, middle class entitlement growth, and in particular Medicare/Medicaid, will eat into every other progressive priority (welfare/housing, education, environmental protection).

versus this view:

As some of us have long pointed out, there are serious grounds for questioning the plausibility of projections that the health care sector would rise to 30 or 40 percent of GDP over the rest of the century. Recently a paper from the Federal Reserve Board documented this argument in considerable detail.

Even more important than the professional argument over health care cost projections is the recent trend in health care costs. While the CBO projections assume that age-adjusted health care costs rise considerably more rapidly than per capita income, in the last four years they have been roughly keeping pace with per capita income.

In fact, in the last year nominal spending on health care services, the sector that comprises almost two-thirds of health care costs, rose by just 1.7 percent. This is far below the rate of nominal GDP growth over this period, which was more than 4.0 percent. While at least some of this slowing in health care costs is undoubtedly due to the downturn, it is hard to believe that it is not at least partially attributable to a slower underlying rate of health care cost growth.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/the-crisis-of-the-deficit-crisis-mongers

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago)

Is there any hope of legislation that would address Microsoft/BP/Apple/etc. not paying billions of dollars in taxes? Is anyone in congress addressing that stuff or is it ix-nay on the acket-ray?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:19 (twelve years ago)

There are thinkers on the Left who recognize that unchecked, middle class entitlement growth, and in particular Medicare/Medicaid, will eat into every other progressive priority (welfare/housing, education, environmental protection).

I agree that we should do something to be more like countries with great health care and lower per-capita spending for that health care. Will reigning in Medicare be sufficient to make us like them? Maybe it's necessary, but is it sufficient, because I don't see how kicking more people off medicare/medicaid alone is going to make less poor people.

Social security is a very effective and efficient poverty-fighting program. I don't see how raising the retirement age or cutting benefits is going to make less poorer people.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:25 (twelve years ago)

note the word middle class

iatee, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:27 (twelve years ago)

The U.S. health care system, even after the ACA, still combines the worst aspects of both laissez faire and socialized medicine. There's little fundamental limit to the amount of heathcare an individual may desire or require, and subsidized health insurance (which dates back to 1944) limits the price signals that would otherwise ration care. So we have a decades long argument about whether the suit that says "no" works for an insurance company or the government, and while there are definite advantages to making them a government employee (scale and immunity to lawsuit), it doesn't change the basic calculus that we collectively want a lot more health services than is good for the larger economy (and often, ourselves).

Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:41 (twelve years ago)

I don't see how kicking more people off medicare/medicaid alone is going to make less poor people.

They die, and then there are fewer poor people. Kinda explains itself, really.

grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:46 (twelve years ago)

means testing medicare/medicaid leaves more money for poor people

iatee, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

er medicaid not necessary in that sentence

iatee, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:48 (twelve years ago)

means testing medicaid is kind of funny when you think about it. "we checked your returns. sorry, you owe us... $1.39 for that MRI"

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

it doesn't change the basic calculus that we collectively want a lot more health services than is good for the larger economy (and often, ourselves).

― Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku

So its our fault, and the fact that health care costs are cheaper in countries with single payer systems doesn't matter. Not sure I get your point

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:01 (twelve years ago)

means testing medicare/medicaid leaves more money for poor people

― iatee, Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Theoretically. Until those wealthier folks who are means-tested out complain that medicare/medicaid is just a welfare handout that should be reduced

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

his point is that single-payer systems generally aren't all-u-can-eat-health-care

I think the opinions of wealthier folks and the opinions of the rest of america will continue to splinter regardless. in any case taking medicare away from people who already have it is a third rail in a way that taking it away from people who don't isn't.

iatee, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:08 (twelve years ago)

xp curmudgeon:

There's probably 30% cost reductions that could be wrung out through single-payer administration, negotiated drug prices, and rationalized costs. Its a big dent that could help with the demographic trends going forward. But as we've chosen not to expose individuals and their doctors are to price signals, we'll still need to reduce demand from deleterious medicine, defensive medicine and especially heroic end-of-life interventions to keep medicine below 15% or so of the economy due to demographic trends (some medicine like childhood immunization or lifestyle interventions for young adults pay for themselves many fold - but the bulk of it is treatment for chronic disease in retirees, which necessarily is just consumption expenditure diverting investment from the future). And as I've mentioned, a government hack is just as good at following a best practices flowchart and saying "no" as someone working at an HMO.

Chinchilla! Chinchilla! Chinchilla! (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:24 (twelve years ago)

LMAO

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald
I'd only read one Oatmeal comic before, but if this sublime response to a Buzzfeed attack is typical, I'll read more

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

oh christ

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

why does everyone feel the need to have an opinion on this stupid Internet beef

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:37 (twelve years ago)

(btw I haven't actually seen anything from either side, just the entirety of Twitter bitching about it)

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:38 (twelve years ago)

they don't teach tom paine at GW or NYU?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridiculous#Juxtaposition_with_the_sublime

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:39 (twelve years ago)

Somewhere max is readying his 'destroy earth' plan.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:40 (twelve years ago)

why does everyone feel the need to have an opinion on this stupid Internet beef

― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:37 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i think it's more that it's p funny that GG sees the oatmeal bro's tl;dr ott butthurt as "sublime"

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

haha sorry, I meant "why does Glen Greenwald have a tweet about this"

I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:42 (twelve years ago)

Because it sound intresting

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

Glenn Greenwald ‏@ggreenwald
@b1g1nj4p4n Seems that way - as long as it was, I was so sad when that response ended - so much perfection

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

I think we found the perfect font for Glen Greenwald.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:49 (twelve years ago)

max tries to set glenn straight

Mordy, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 20:53 (twelve years ago)

is that a project

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:04 (twelve years ago)

wouldn't that have been tucked into when max told everyone to vote for Obama?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:06 (twelve years ago)

Boehner takin charge:

last week...the steering committee, the Republican group that makes committee assignments and is heavily influenced by the speaker, agreed to kick three conservative freshmen — Rep. Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) and Rep. David Schweikert (Ariz.) — and veteran maverick Rep. Walter B. Jones (N.C.) out of top committee jobs.

Huelskamp, a farmer, was removed from the Agriculture and Budget committees. Amash lost his Budget Committee job, while Schweikert and Jones were removed from the Financial Services Committee.

“The speaker made it pretty clear that this might not be the last of this and others are expected to fall in line and stay in line,” Huelskamp said.

So far, what has been a notably boisterous caucus seems to be meeting Boehner’s expectations.

Each congressman had crossed leaders, and some colleagues, repeatedly. Amash and Huelskamp, for example, voted against the Republican budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.) in the Budget Committee last spring, arguing it did not cut spending deeply enough.

Huelskamp told reporters that if he could have found a flight in time, he would have swept back to Washington last December to deliver the lone objection to the payroll tax deal, a move that would have required all of his fellow House members to return to town over Christmas to take up the politically treacherous issue.

He said colleagues have told the group that the steering committee used a score card of past votes to determine loyalty and targeted members who have not stood by House leaders.

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 21:39 (twelve years ago)

also lols w McConnell:

"A few weeks ago, Senator (Tom) Coburn issued a study that showed taxpayers are funding Moroccan pottery classes, promoting shampoo and other beauty products for cats and dogs and a video game that allows them to relive prom night," McConnell said. "Get this: Taxpayers also just spent $325,000 on a robotic squirrel named RoboSquirrel."

goddamn robosquirrels bankruptin the country!

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:00 (twelve years ago)

I've stopped paying attention to Rush. Does anyone have a sense of whether his influence is waning or waxing?

― SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:27 PM (3 hours ago)

About to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame--definitely waxing.

clemenza, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:17 (twelve years ago)

Good for Coburn to shed light on the horrors of physical products being made in the US by workers that have jobs. Let's focus on this RoboSquirrel while BP pockets 40,000x that amount from taxpayers.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:19 (twelve years ago)

Moroccan pottery?! what's wrong with AMERICAN pottery

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:21 (twelve years ago)

but first let's talk about how obama should not be able to raise the debt ceiling that congress votes on to pay for the budget that congress voted for.

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:22 (twelve years ago)

this shit is seriously blowing my mind

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 00:24 (twelve years ago)

http://newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Teles_Steven_Kludgeocracy_NAF_Dec2012.pdf

Conservatives over the last few years have increasingly claimed that America is, in Hayek’s terms, on the road to serfdom. This is ridiculous, for it ascribes vastly greater coherence to American government than we have ever achieved. If anything, we have arrived at a form of government with no ideological justification whatsoever.

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 01:13 (twelve years ago)

"Get this: Taxpayers also just spent $325,000 on a robotic squirrel named RoboSquirrel."

goddamn robosquirrels bankruptin the country!

― Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:00 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol I bet this is a project that a prof at my alma mater works on, kinda delirious to single out particular NSF grants for the quarterly "yr profligate government in action" grandstanding

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:08 (twelve years ago)

oh no forgive me apparently this is a different robot squirrel

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:09 (twelve years ago)

Presumably, building extremely capable robots must progress in stages from the rudimentary to the fantastically complex. I expect that building a "robot squirrel" presents a somewhat manageable set of interesting problems which have not yet been solved. The payoff is not a meg- factory owned by Robot Squirrel Industries to supply an insatiable consumer demand for robotic squirrels, but rather a demonstration of new, generalized abilities that robots have never before had, which could be adapted to any number of uses by other robot-designers.

Aimless, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:32 (twelve years ago)

Presumably, building extremely capable robots must progress in stages from the rudimentary to the fantastically complex. I expect that building a "robot squirrel" presents a somewhat manageable set of interesting problems which have not yet been solved. The payoff is not a meg- factory owned by Robot Squirrel Industries to supply an insatiable consumer demand for robotic squirrels, but rather a demonstration of new, generalized abilities that robots have never before had, which could be adapted to any number of uses by other robot-designers.

― Aimless, Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:32 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Go back to Russia, NERD

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:53 (twelve years ago)

DRILL BABY DRILL

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:54 (twelve years ago)

actually the robot squirrels I'm familiar with are pretty rudimentary, robot-wise. They are for studying squirrel behavior. You get a somewhat-plausible robot squirrel and the real squirrels will come hang out and you can watch them from your hiding spot

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 03:56 (twelve years ago)

$325,000 seems a bit high for a rudimentary robot that's just a decoy.

Aimless, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 04:13 (twelve years ago)

wouldn't that money be better spent killing all squirrels so we don't have to understand them anymore?

she was giving it to two friends ...Aaay! (crüt), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 04:14 (twelve years ago)

you couldn't kill every squirrel for only $325k

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 04:15 (twelve years ago)

I mean think about it, that pays for maybe 10 or 20 full-time squirrel exterminators and there's millions of squirrels. You can't round them all up onto trains.

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 04:15 (twelve years ago)

maybe onto a really useful train...

http://richbrant.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/thomas-the-tank-engine1.jpg

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 04:22 (twelve years ago)

fuck you, Nick

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/opinion/sunday/kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 06:21 (twelve years ago)

"Some young people here don’t join the military (a traditional escape route for poor, rural Americans) because it’s easier to rely on food stamps and disability payments."

oh no

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 06:23 (twelve years ago)

yeah I know which of those sounds like a better bet to me

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 06:24 (twelve years ago)

Kristof was on the Morning Joe tv show talking this up, and of course Joe was drooling with excitement. It looks like he is basing all this largely on anecdotes and not studies.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 14:11 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, Obama's concessions have begun:

While neither provided details, one person familiar with the White House proposal said Mr. Obama had reduced his call for $1.6 trillion in additional revenues from the wealthy over the first 10 years to $1.4 trillion, still $600 billion higher than the Republicans’ position. And another said the president also proposed that the two sides commit to working on overhauling the corporate tax code next year.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 14:16 (twelve years ago)

syrian human rights activist was on BBC this morning complaining that the US took so long to recognize the rebels, that the US declared that one Al-Qaeda affiliate a terrorist organization, etc. US is kinda damned if they do damned if they don't. don't intervene and you allow a human rights crisis to continue, intervene and suddenly the human rights activists are blaming you for committing human rights crises yourself.

Mordy, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 14:25 (twelve years ago)

Not sure what Kristof's thesis is, but welfare + early childhood development is better than welfare alone. So we all agree that we need to spend more on programs like Head Start. Awesome.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 17:44 (twelve years ago)

He wants early development assistance and nothing after that

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 17:52 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, but he doesn't have the sand to come out and say it clearly.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee expects that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20121212a.htm

nice

before and after broscience (goole), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

Van Hollen talking shit about Boehner and his problems with his caucus

Twerkin in a coal mine (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:30 (twelve years ago)

Its fine with with me if they can't agree and make a deal before the cliff

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 20:46 (twelve years ago)

It's fine with me if they go over the cliff

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 20:47 (twelve years ago)

http://www.prosebeforehos.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/fiscal-cliff-huxtable.jpg

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

Yeah I'm not rooting for austerity.

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

Yeah I'm not rooting for austerity.

― SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 21:28 (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I see what you did there.

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 22:23 (twelve years ago)

self-loathing at its finest

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 22:28 (twelve years ago)

Eric Holder, everyone.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 December 2012 01:31 (twelve years ago)

Ladies and Gentlemen, tis the season for Ebeneezer Kristof to interrogate the Cratchits about Tiny Tim's SSI check.

Theodora Celery, Thursday, 13 December 2012 03:46 (twelve years ago)

Seriously, I worked in a public school, and the kids that got SSI NEEDED EVERY DAMN PENNY THEY GOT.

Theodora Celery, Thursday, 13 December 2012 03:47 (twelve years ago)

in the past 24 hours, 2 different customers have told me that they are holding off on christmas buying because of the financial cliff, which is a good seasonal reminder that i am not allowed to slap customers no matter how much i might want to

tiniest homeless (jjjusten), Thursday, 13 December 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

you should amend the store name to "******* Concert Systems and Slaps". then you'd be golden

Jesus, the Total Douchebag (DJP), Thursday, 13 December 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

you never know, maybe they were sourcing instruments for various military bands

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 13 December 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

"Baby, I didn't mean to sleep with her, but, you know, the fiscal cliff."

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:36 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_12/its_not_about_your_ideology_it041776.php

House Republican leaders are trying to tamp down rapidly spreading right-wing fury over a “purge” of three conservatives from choice committee assignments by letting it be known that they were punished not for their ideology but for being “a—holes.” Yes, that’s the official term deployed by a spox for Rep. Lynn Westmoreland in explaining the punitive actions. An unnamed source in House circles called the three (Reps. Amash, Huelskamp and Schweikert) the “most egregious a—holes in the House Republican Conference,” so this is a very precise message they are getting out.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

looooooooooooool

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:27 (twelve years ago)

i don't doubt it but come on

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQl5aYhkF3E

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago)

that is hilarious

Jesus, the Total Douchebag (DJP), Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:33 (twelve years ago)

Chuck Hagel completes WH vetting for DOD secretary.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

Ugh, not that it surprises me that Obama would go for a Republican as a Defense Secretary.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:23 (twelve years ago)

yr pretty much never gonna get a liberal running the Pentagon so my reaction is pretty much eh, whatever

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:26 (twelve years ago)

i support the new rights throw out the asshole doctrine but feel like it should be overseen by an impartial committee

tiniest homeless (jjjusten), Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

Susan Rice withdraws from consideration for SoS.

Clay, Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

gah

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:01 (twelve years ago)

fuckin McCain

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:01 (twelve years ago)

welp

if he goes for kerry i'm gonna freak.

before and after broscience (goole), Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:01 (twelve years ago)

i heard that susan rice was involved in some sort of scandal where she executed a diplomat

dexpresso (Z S), Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

dear republicans,
1) pull selves up by bootstraps
2) throw selves out

SHUT UP AND GET YOUR TURKEY SCIENCE BOOKS (Austerity Ponies), Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:09 (twelve years ago)

self-deportation, we call it

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 13 December 2012 22:05 (twelve years ago)

Susan Rice, for reasons the GOP has no interest in, is pretty fucking useless.

Ugh, not that it surprises me that Obama would go for a Republican as a Defense Secretary.

lol, that's a good one if you can reach back to remember his first one.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 December 2012 03:33 (twelve years ago)

defense is a great place for obama to go republican since he agrees with them on most major foreign policy decisions

Mordy, Friday, 14 December 2012 03:35 (twelve years ago)

Leon Panetta "was" a Republican too

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 December 2012 03:37 (twelve years ago)

i think i speak for everyone when i say american needs this gubernatorial battle royale http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/14/nyregion/promise-vs-reality-in-newark-as-mayor-eyes-higher-office.html

lag∞n, Friday, 14 December 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

it needs them both to lose

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 December 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f7/Avpmovie.jpg

Mordy, Friday, 14 December 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago)

jindal now in favor of making birth control over the counter

Mordy, Friday, 14 December 2012 17:13 (twelve years ago)

kerry to state, ugh now the rice takedown is a legit disaster

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

yep

curmudgeon, Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:36 (twelve years ago)

Although maybe somehow the Dems can save his Senate seat

curmudgeon, Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

Is John Quincy Adams dead?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

who cares? xp

Kerry will be indistinguishable from Romney at State

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

brought to you by the morbs random post generator

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago)

just speakin truth to Dembots

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:35 (twelve years ago)

lagoon where did you see the kerry thing?

iatee, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

twitter

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:36 (twelve years ago)

David Grann ‏@DavidGrann
RT @davebriggstv: Obama has chosen John Kerry as Secretary of State - Chicago Sun-Times - http://www.suntimes.com/17019560-761/source-obama-has-chosen-john-kerry-as-secretary-of-state.html

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:37 (twelve years ago)

New York Daily News too: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/kerry-replace-hillary-state-dept-report-article-1.1220883

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:38 (twelve years ago)

i'm sure it's true (kerry obv heavy favorite to be new SOS) but probably want to wait for better sourcing than "a source has told Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed."

Mordy, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

idk michael sneed but seeing as hes a sun times reporter doesnt seem out of the question that he could have sources inside the obama camp

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:41 (twelve years ago)

not out of the question but nowhere near certain. barely better than 'it's rumored' which is how npr was sourcing it two days ago

Mordy, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:43 (twelve years ago)

yeah it's plausible and so is the info it's just curious that it isn't more widespread. maybe it's more of an unplanned leak than a planned leak.

iatee, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

welp i certainly hope its not true

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

apparently he's hillary's first choice to replace her

Mordy, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

So do the dems have anyone waiting in the wings who can win his seAt in Mass? Or is Pres Scott Brown back, baby?

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:45 (twelve years ago)

should get gore instead

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

Phil Elliott ‏@Philip_Elliott
WASHINGTON (AP) - State Department: Ill Hillary Rodham Clinton faints, has concussion, now recovering at home.

lag∞n, Saturday, 15 December 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)

just got word Springsteen will run for prez

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 December 2012 17:38 (twelve years ago)

yr predecessor literally fainting as you are confirmed as their successor does look pretty bad

kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html (schlump), Saturday, 15 December 2012 18:14 (twelve years ago)

Michael Sneed:

http://justpiper.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/michaelsneed.jpg

(*・_・)ノ⌒ ☆ (Je55e), Sunday, 16 December 2012 09:23 (twelve years ago)

Get well, Hillary!

Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 December 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

she may get better but she'll never be well

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 December 2012 17:24 (twelve years ago)

Politicians do things in our name that, if we did them ourselves, we could never live with ourselves afterward. The great majority of people hate this, but simultaneously accept this service guiltily, as a valuable function. Morbs is not among them.

Aimless, Sunday, 16 December 2012 19:32 (twelve years ago)

value, defined strangely through collective guilt trips / acceptance of the Powerful's definition of "the possible."

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:15 (twelve years ago)

The value in this function is perverse, but perfectly understandable. The sins commited in our name are designed to preserve a country's wealth and power, the possession of which is notoriously corrupting. The degree of corruption varies in almost the exact proportion as the benefits bestowed by the power in question.

morbs, you innoculate yourself daily against this corruption, by swallowing heroic amounts of antidotal opinions, but there is no escaping the corrosive effects entirely - apart from living as a hermit in constant prayer.

Aimless, Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:28 (twelve years ago)

Do you think I am unaware of that? "Escaping" is different from "minimizing."

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

I share in our collective guilt, I've never claimed otherwise.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:32 (twelve years ago)

The fact that you don't accept this guilt quietly and gratefully is what most ilxors seem to react most violently to about you. The intensity with which they want you to be quiet (or at least quieter) about it and to more faithfully mirror their own acquiescence sometimes astounds me.

Aimless, Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:45 (twelve years ago)

Probably has something to do with rudeness and calling everyone "dembots"

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:48 (twelve years ago)

there is that. morbs reacts a bit violently to us, too.

Aimless, Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:50 (twelve years ago)

Aimless: "the Morbz whisperer"

Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 16 December 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

another proud move in the annals of Change

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/us/politics/justice-dept-studied-and-shelved-ideas-to-bolster-gun-database.html

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 December 2012 01:59 (twelve years ago)

Morbs, honest question: have you ever considered moving to a different country? It sounds snide, but I don't intend it to be snide. There are times I'd have considered it, for sure, if I did not have a wife and kids here.

Sillier follow-up exercise: if you did move, where would you move and why?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 02:13 (twelve years ago)

LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

dexpresso (Z S), Monday, 17 December 2012 02:32 (twelve years ago)

I'm too old and would never get a job somewhere else

also this is my country, this is my people

you Chicago people are really prickly about how things have turned out, huh

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 December 2012 09:21 (twelve years ago)

o_O

Jeff, Monday, 17 December 2012 12:53 (twelve years ago)

I was just curious, honestly. You're a harsh critic, and often justified (if, um, impolitic), so I was wondering if any country came closer to meeting your ideal.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 14:03 (twelve years ago)

My wife and I have, of late, been seriously discussing moving somewhere else in the world, even if it's just Canada. (Which for us is just across the lake.) This country is sick in the head, I'm 43 years old, and I don't know if I want to continue being a part of it.

Gollum: "Hot, Ready and Smeagol!" (Phil D.), Monday, 17 December 2012 14:09 (twelve years ago)

I'd happily bail out of here, but it's a pipe dream at this point.

WilliamC, Monday, 17 December 2012 14:49 (twelve years ago)

I've got family who have left - my sister left for academic reasons accelerated by politics, another married an Aussie - but both left the US before they had families of their own. And neither is coming back in the foreseeable future, because, gah, why would they?

I only asked Morbs, hypothetically, because there is an awful lot wrong with the country and the way it works, or doesn't work, but our familiarity (or relative privilege - surely America at its worst is a step up from many places) may magnify many of those flaws. Just wondering if Morbs believes we can do better, and if so, if there's any place he'd cite as a comparative example.

For the record, the only thing in recent memory that would have truly sent me packing at any cost would have been a President Palin. But that doesn't seem to be in the cards anymore.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 14:55 (twelve years ago)

i wouldn't mind getting out, even though i do (currently) have it pretty easy here. the thought of having and raising kids here - irrespective of what happened last Friday - does give me pause though.

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 17 December 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

I imagine raising kids elsewhere can be just as difficult, though many other countries at least offer more services that make things much easier.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 14:59 (twelve years ago)

I'm not saying I wouldn't ever leave America, but I don't know if Australia would be my first-choice if I was going by political reasons.

pplains, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago)

Political sister went to England, but then, things aren't much better. Though the differences are significant. Despite political ups and downs, there are some basic services provided and expectations met by both England and Australia that we lack here.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

Like, the "conservatives" of Australia, UK and Canada, for example, are several shades below the intensity of the conservatives here. Afaict.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:09 (twelve years ago)

Then again, we don't have a functioning fascist party, either.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:10 (twelve years ago)

even if you leave america america continues to exist

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:11 (twelve years ago)

but like Quentin Tarantino, it can be ignored (until it drops a drone on your kids)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:13 (twelve years ago)

america in my experience is not ignored by anyone, particularly not expats, or canadians

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:15 (twelve years ago)

So in predictable mundane news on another subject, it seems Boehner is now offering tax revenue, but only for those who make more than a million; plus more cuts on the social security side. Inside the beltway types call this progress, but they would refer to a watered-down proposal like this as such.

curmudgeon, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:25 (twelve years ago)

it is a pretty striking reversal for republicans to be offering new taxes, its finally starting to sink in for them that theyre beat and obamas not gonna just cave like they thought, the proposal is of course ridiculous, and of course theres no evidence that boehner can deliver the votes, but still its an interesting twist

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:31 (twelve years ago)

can't believe tarantino has gotten ahold of drone technology

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

just wait til you see the third movie in his revenge trilogy, its a documentary

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

I imagine raising kids elsewhere can be just as difficult, though many other countries at least offer more services that make things much easier.

it's really more about our idiotic culture than access to services

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

one of the cool things abt other countries is you dont take they ways in which their culture is idiotic as personally

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

yeah it's like being embarrassed by your family vs being embarrassed by a buncha strangers

iatee, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

haha exactly!

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

Every country has idiotic culture; that's the stuff you only learn when you live there. But services? Man, what my sister in law in Sydney got when she had her first kid was incredible compared to what you get here.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:46 (twelve years ago)

I hear you get a pint of gin in Siam for every kid born.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:48 (twelve years ago)

I think I would spend less time on the phone begging for delivery of cancer meds in other Western industrialized nations.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

would you move to another country if there were no legal barriers?

iatee, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:52 (twelve years ago)

that i would guess is absolutely true, i dont think theres any question that theres a lot of countries that have better governments than ours, im just always a lil suspicious people being all omg this place is so fd up i got to get out of here, especially since no one ever does it xp

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

Because it's actually pretty hard to do!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

The last thing any other country wants is an influx of Americans.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

I'd move to Sweden. As far as raising kids is concerned, it sounds like a paradise.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:56 (twelve years ago)

Because it's actually pretty hard to do!

― Josh in Chicago, Monday, December 17, 2012 10:56 AM (10 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

its possible, people do it, p much everyone who talks abt it never takes step one of looking into the logistics of the thing

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

yeah i think i'd have no problem decamping for a scandinavian country.

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 17 December 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

it's definitely a form of privilege (class/race/ethnicity/etc) to feel like you could easily move to another country

Mordy, Monday, 17 December 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

I've tried to get jobs in other countries fairly recently but the difficulty of actually breaking into their xenophobic job cultures got in the way

Euler, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

its interesting that a lot of the people who threaten to move away are doing pretty goos and their day to day experience isnt prob that much different than yr average scandinavian, the stuff thats freaking them out is more on the news

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

It's very hard to get visas that let you work in other countries, in my experience. Straight-up citizenship seems even harder.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

xpost Well, there is a psychic toll to this stuff. There were literally parents in tears at my kids' drop off this morning.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

it's definitely a form of privilege (class/race/ethnicity/etc) to feel like you could easily move to another country

― Mordy, Monday, December 17, 2012 10:59 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

idk a lot of people who do actually move to canada are from countries much humbler than the usa, i guess a lot of work is being done by that easily

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

yeah I mean it's terrorism

(for which btw fuck the Cold Warriors for their terrorism too)

Euler, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

the united states has a lot of crossover w/ canada, which is understandable (very similar cultures, geographically close, politically close, linguistically, etc), but moving to most other places from the united states is not an option for most people.

Mordy, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

Yeah. This is heavy

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

ive spent a lot of time in canada and it is definitely more peaceful than the usa, but its not really that different, and you will spend the rest of yr days there experiencing low level irritation at canadianness

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

Other countries tend to have really old buildings still around too. Sometimes even castles.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 17 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

Indeed, I looked into moving to various other countries awhile back. If you're a nuclear engineer or a linguist it's somewhat easier but being from America and not having a highly-desired specialized skill basically kills all chances. I know the UK at least uses a points system to award visas and being a citizen of the USA is like worth negative points.

Frobisher the (Viceroy), Monday, 17 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

Get there, wash some dishes, do some yard work, and marry into the country.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 17 December 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

quebec city has a castle wall, factoid

lag∞n, Monday, 17 December 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, when I hit customs in Toronto en route to QC for a site visit, I found out that having a couple engineering degrees gave me bonus nafta points or something.

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Monday, 17 December 2012 18:12 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile the Electoral College starts counting:

In Mississippi, which Romney carried comfortably, six men chosen earlier as electors met in a small committee room in the state Capitol and cast their votes for the GOP candidate. Well aware they were doing so in a lost cause, they opted for humor. The state's Republican governor, Phil Bryant, joked that Billy Mounger, an 86-year-old elector, probably wished to vote for Calvin Coolidge, a renowned small-government conservative president in the 1920s.

"I'd like to have Coolidge back," said Mounger, a Jackson businessman.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 20:43 (twelve years ago)

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/273151-dukakis-seen-as-possible-senate-replacement-if-kerry-tapped-for-state

possible interim Senator if Kerry goes to State

curmudgeon, Monday, 17 December 2012 21:11 (twelve years ago)

why does everyone want to leave the senate for the cabinet? how shitty could the mantle be, jesus.

before and after broscience (goole), Monday, 17 December 2012 21:16 (twelve years ago)

senate: you're one of a hundred politicians jockeying for the limelight, and you can't accomplish anything without 59 of them agreeing with you, which they won't do without your kissing some ass.

cabinet: you get to run a huge bureaucracy with a very large budget and make decisions like a CEO, with very little interference from your boss most of the time; the only unbreakable rule is Don't Embarass The Boss.

Aimless, Monday, 17 December 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago)

no more grubbing for money either

before and after broscience (goole), Monday, 17 December 2012 21:30 (twelve years ago)

Anyone else notice gas prices shrinking? Down to $3.30 locally, which granted, is not "low," but certainly seems low given current trends.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 21:32 (twelve years ago)

(Also heard on the radio this morning that the US gets more oil from Canada now than from any other country.)

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 21:33 (twelve years ago)

Gas is sneaking below $3/gal around here in some towns.

WilliamC, Monday, 17 December 2012 21:38 (twelve years ago)

Gas.dropped ten cents in five days here

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 21:51 (twelve years ago)

I tanked up this morning for $2.84/gallon. (Tennessee hasn't raised its gas taxes in forever.)

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 17 December 2012 21:54 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, gas in Waco last week was 2.99, and only 3.24 here in Portland this week

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Monday, 17 December 2012 22:39 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, gas prices have nicely settled in NY since the hurricane, which I wouldn't have expected.

Nhex, Monday, 17 December 2012 22:40 (twelve years ago)

$2.84/gallon

!!!!

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 22:42 (twelve years ago)

What are Republicans saying about that? That they would be even lower if Republicans had their way, I guess.

curmudgeon, Monday, 17 December 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago)

Saying nothing, no elections right now.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 December 2012 22:57 (twelve years ago)

hey, Daniel Inouye just passed away

Jesus, the Total Douchebag (DJP), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

how could you tell?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

he stopped farting

Jesus, the Total Douchebag (DJP), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:06 (twelve years ago)

(more seriously: college friend who works in political fundraising posted about it on Facebook)

Jesus, the Total Douchebag (DJP), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:07 (twelve years ago)

The story about how he lost his arm in WW2 is crazy

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:53 (twelve years ago)

My enduring memory of Inouye is letting Ollie North off the hook during Iran-Contra but still called "the Chinese guy" by my more reactionary relatives.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 December 2012 23:57 (twelve years ago)

I always liked him, in part because I know his son Kenny and the Senator just looked nice and friendly standing in the back of the old 930 Club in DC in the early '80s watching his son play guitar with Dischord hardcore band Marginal Man. I'm sure others will say Senator Inouye did not do enough in handling the Iran-Contra investigation in the Senate and other things.

curmudgeon, Monday, 17 December 2012 23:58 (twelve years ago)

Yep

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 00:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-boehner-meet-as-debt-talks-intensify/2012/12/17/6b43c24a-4868-11e2-b6f0-e851e741d196_story.html?hpid=z1

Obama compromising: From $ 250,000 up to 400, 000 regarding the level where tax rates go up plus a Social Security cut

Obama also gave ground on a key Republican demand — applying a less-generous measure of inflation across the federal government. That change would save about $225 billion over the next decade, with more than half the savings coming from smaller cost-of-living increases for Social Security beneficiaries.

In addition, Obama increased his overall offer on spending cuts and dropped his demand for extending the payroll tax holiday, which has benefited virtually every worker for the past two years. But he is still seeking $80 billion in new spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits and an increase in the federal government’s borrowing limit large enough to avert any new fight over the issue for two years.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:42 (twelve years ago)

"compromising," no, it's what defines him and always has (as president, certainly).

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:46 (twelve years ago)

i'm still hoping they don't get a deal done before dec 25th

Mordy, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

I love it when they have to work on Christmas.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 15:02 (twelve years ago)

Its the least they can do, when they're proposing to take away Social Security benefits. I hope the deal collapses. I hope the Dems in Congress oppose the reduced cost-of-living increases for Social Security benficiaries. I meant to put "compromising" in quotes, as yes, since his grand bargain proposal he has been seemingly determined to cut Social Security

Also, as I read elsewhere, when Obama was proposing his grand bargain they were hailing it as a step that would address the deficit issue and take it off the table; but Republicans now keep saying that with every debt/borrowing limit deadline they want more cuts (he's trying this time to buy them off for 2 years when he should instead stand up to these demands). How many times do they have to keep doing this before the White House gets it.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 15:07 (twelve years ago)

They get it. They don't care.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 15:12 (twelve years ago)

I hope the Dems in Congress oppose the reduced cost-of-living increases for Social Security benficiaries.

test is going to be how many votes Pelosi can pull from her caucus against such a proposal vs. how many votes Boehner can pull from her caucus to increase taxes

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

yeah dispite all the imminent deal talk im guessing we're more at trail balloon phase, everyone call their congress people and say no social security cuts

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:58 (twelve years ago)

trading fairly minor long term cuts for big short term gains is for obvs reason v seductive to politicians but is really not a v good outcome, we need to be expanding these programs not slowly eroding them, gop ran big on protecting ss and medicare, they should be held to that

lag∞n, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:01 (twelve years ago)

http://prospect.org/article/john-kerry-most-progressive-pick-state-department

Mordy, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago)

Speaking of gas prices, the stock market isn't exactly quaking in its boots these days.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:17 (twelve years ago)

after this shitty week, a nice new romney incompetence story made me a feel a little better, like hugging a teddy bear.

a robotic squirrel named RoboSquirrel (reddening), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:21 (twelve years ago)

use that as your security blanket for the next 4-yo-infinite years of competent austerity

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:46 (twelve years ago)

4-to-infinite

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:46 (twelve years ago)

eh, no, but I will get a good ninety to two hundred seconds of chuckling out of American Express having to field inquiries about suspicious charges by the Romney campaign.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:52 (twelve years ago)

so weird that BuzzFeed is apparently a major news organizatoin now

dexpresso (Z S), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

I don't really follow the horse-trading stories anymore - is it basically accepted that Hillary is leaving as SoS to gear up for 2016?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

yep

iatee, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

yes

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:02 (twelve years ago)

first I hope she gears up to enjoy a gin and tonic and Alice Munro on a cold December night.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

Rick Perry, jerk

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:20 (twelve years ago)

hmm resistance to SS cuts from the Senate? would've expected this more from the House tbh

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2012/12/18/dick-durbin-no-cut-in-social-security-benefits/?hpid=z2

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 18:48 (twelve years ago)

Krugman dissects this chained CPI nonsense:

Switching from the regular CPI to the chained CPI doesn’t affect benefits immediately after retirement, which are based on your past earnings.What it does mean is that after retirement your payments grow more slowly, about 0.3 percent each year. So if you retire at 65, your income at 75 would be 3 percent less under this proposal than under current law; at 85 it would be 6 percent less; there’s supposedly a bump-up in benefits for people who make it that far.

This is not good; there’s no good policy reason to be doing this, because the savings won’t have any significant impact on the underlying budget issues. And for many older people it would hurt. Also, the symbolism of a Democratic president cutting Social Security is pretty awful.

So is what Obama gets out of this — basically unemployment benefits and infrastructure — worth it? The hardship of the unemployed is important; on the other hand, the numbers here are only about half a percent of GDP. As I said, right now I’m not feeling positive.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 20:18 (twelve years ago)

have to admit i'm kind of hoping for boehner's backbenchers to revolt.

before and after broscience (goole), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

some, particularly in safe districts, def will - its just a question of how many. I don't have much faith in Boehner controlling his caucus fwiw

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 December 2012 20:41 (twelve years ago)

test is going to be how many votes Pelosi can pull from her caucus against such a proposal vs. how many votes Boehner can pull from her caucus to increase taxes

― If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:27 AM (9 hours ago)

orrrr not

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/nancy-pelosi-fiscal-cliff_n_2324042.html?ref=topbar

k3vin k., Wednesday, 19 December 2012 01:48 (twelve years ago)

this doesn't look good

k3vin k., Wednesday, 19 December 2012 01:53 (twelve years ago)

former republican too liberal for the washington times post, amazing

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/chuck-hagel-is-not-right-for-defense-secretary/2012/12/18/07e03e20-493c-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html

k3vin k., Wednesday, 19 December 2012 02:47 (twelve years ago)

Fred Hiatt is a member of my childhood synagogue, I was classmates with his son in torah school. This isn't really relevant to my point, which is that Fred Hiatt's editorial board has been a congress of dipshits for quite a while.

wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 05:25 (twelve years ago)

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/and_now_for_the_republican_freakout/

Mordy, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 13:32 (twelve years ago)

I'd be all for disgruntled Republicans and the Democratic Progressive caucus both voting down Obama's plan for different reasons

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 14:11 (twelve years ago)

Time Magazine trolling Morbz today.

http://timepoy.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/970_cover_1231.jpg

Mordy, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 14:31 (twelve years ago)

I see Time is back to their OJ tricks.

pplains, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 14:48 (twelve years ago)

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQrBjDiSt-Kn7aYcuvTnjui_7Zctf1dMvXFzlvlxI0wDLEioH7x

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

robert bork, dead.

dexpresso (Z S), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:05 (twelve years ago)

Dang, Obama could be replacing a Republican justice now had things gone his way.

pplains, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:07 (twelve years ago)

Sure, the price would've been 25 years of that dude on the bench but hey.

pplains, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:07 (twelve years ago)

Bork, second most rage-filled pol after John Bolton.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, I was going to say that maybe death'll relieve his stress levels.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:10 (twelve years ago)

Top 10 Names for Robert Bork's Beard - September 16, 1987

10. The Chin Slinky
9. The Amish Outlaw
8. The See-Through
7. My Very First Beard (from Kenner)
6. The Lunatic Fringe
5. Senor Itchy
4. The Radioactive Goat
3. Salute to C. Everett Koop
2. Gopher Butt
1. The Babe Magnet

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:10 (twelve years ago)

The Corner will be especially delicious today.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:13 (twelve years ago)

you know, whatever Anthony Kennedy's flaws, let's be glad the Senate voted him in instead.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:17 (twelve years ago)

Who was the guy nominated immediately after Bork? Everyone forgets him, he dropped out because he had smoked marijuana once.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

Ginsberg, whose name I remember because of Bloom County

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:20 (twelve years ago)

Hahah that's right.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:21 (twelve years ago)

Joe Biden and Thomas Sowell, both with hair:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEOlK4y8AUo

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:27 (twelve years ago)

Robert Bork dead

乒乓, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

oh I see it's been covered

乒乓, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:51 (twelve years ago)

What he sounded like during confirmation hearings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ffTtOMIJAk

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

Time Person of the Year is always bullshit, but it's "for good or ill," right?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

(p sure Hitler, Stalin and Kissinger all won)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

newsmaker of the year

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

although they did wimp out at giving it to osama

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

t/s hilter, stalin, 'you', 'the baby boomers', obama

iatee, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

too bad "your hard drive" didnt make finalists

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

'the computer' won once tho

iatee, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

and turned its users into slouchy papier-mache:

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1983/1101830103_400.jpg

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)

Mark Sanchez will be given the honor in 2013.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

the ipad mini

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

not that you'd notice the diff if Obama was exchanged for the next 30 whoremasters in the line of succession

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

I want to be at the meeting where they all crowd around a table and hash it out, like I bet there was one guy arguing vehemently for 'twitter'

iatee, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

time cover shot is so bad

kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html (schlump), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

In other news, did I miss the discussion of this:

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/12/conservatives-think-hillary-clinton-faking-her-concussion/60114/

Jim Treacher: "If she has a concussion, let's see the medical report. Let's see some proof that she’s not just stonewalling."

John Bolton: "When you don't want to go to a meeting or conference, or an event, you have a 'diplomatic illness,' ... And this is a diplomatic illness to beat the band."

Lucianne Goldberg: "Hillary has given us a great new excuse. Don't call in with a cold or a bad tooth. Just say you have a concussion. It can last for days."

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

shouldve been an instagram picture of obama

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:10 (twelve years ago)

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A-fN3PGCMAAKunz.jpg

kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html (schlump), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

in sexy black:

http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1987/1101870921_400.jpg

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

BORK

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

he looks like the leader of some hippie sex cult or something

iatee, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

while John Paul II lands and listens

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

what am i doing in this hippie sex cult just landing and listening what dont look at me like that

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5a/Borkdcu0.jpg/250px-Borkdcu0.jpg

bizarro gazzara, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_AI1_CxkKDPs/S8O5W1tGflI/AAAAAAAADB0/ODPy_GsP3wE/s1600/bork.jpg

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago)

Want to celebrate the inauguration with President and Michelle Obama?

Well, you’re in luck: Today, we’re starting our Grand Inaugural Contest. If you contribute today, you’ll be automatically entered for a chance to win.

If you win this once in a lifetime opportunity, you and your guest will receive:

Tickets to an official inaugural ball with President and Michelle Obama
Passes to an exclusive lunch with Elizabeth Warren and every single new Democratic senator
Airfare and hotel accommodations in the Washington D.C. area

email I received

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 18:18 (twelve years ago)

Most striking thing about the Time cover is how uncomfortably that "O" sits between the "B" and the "R."

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)

Also, he looks kind of like a Jedi.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 18:22 (twelve years ago)

I think this is a cry for help from Time. "Print journalism is dying and we can't stand it anymore, we're so out of ideas..."

Gukbe, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago)

His beard inspired the judge on The Simpsons - true immortality is his.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 18:35 (twelve years ago)

grover who are you even anymore http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/12/grover-bends-the-pledge-for-boehner.php

lag∞n, Wednesday, 19 December 2012 19:50 (twelve years ago)

"Time magazine, I think there is some irrelevancy there, to tell you the truth. I mean consider their list of the most influential people in the country and the world, some who have made that list -- yours truly! that ought to tell you something right there regarding the credence we should give Time magazine and their list of people."

-- Sarah Palin, in an interview on Fox News, on President Obama being named "Person of the Year."

heh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW7Z20fJH6I (lag∞n), Thursday, 20 December 2012 13:43 (twelve years ago)

I'd love a game show where English teachers could taze Sarah Palin every time she failed to complete a sentence, or used incorrect grammar.

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Thursday, 20 December 2012 13:57 (twelve years ago)

A reminder of what happened to Dems the last time they tried to touch Social Security.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 December 2012 14:07 (twelve years ago)

that's a canny play by Sarah P you gotta give credit where due

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 20 December 2012 14:49 (twelve years ago)

Did they ask the silly cunt if her inclusion was for good or ill? According to TIME, it can be for either reason.

rihanna, will you ever win? (suzy), Thursday, 20 December 2012 14:51 (twelve years ago)

Grivalja's dope - kinda surprised Pelosi is siding with Obama over the progressive caucus

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:39 (twelve years ago)

No surprise here. Pelosi undercutting Obama would send a wholly different message than when the progresive caucus does. Her going public with a strong disagreement would put blood in the water, as they say, and the Republican sharks would gather fast.

Aimless, Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:44 (twelve years ago)

hmm good point

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

I'm pining my faint hopes on Pelosi's superior political skills and steadfast progressivism.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:51 (twelve years ago)

telling when Dems are lying or being 'strategic': worse than TV poker shows

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

her skills are def superior to Boehner's so hopes are not totally unfounded

well this is something cool that Obama did

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 20 December 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

lol

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 December 2012 20:25 (twelve years ago)

epic boehner fail!

Mordy, Friday, 21 December 2012 10:41 (twelve years ago)

Sad hangdog Boehner.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 13:26 (twelve years ago)

Enjoy the tale of a tragedy where you're glad everyone's sad:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/336287/inside-meltdown-robert-costa

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 13:27 (twelve years ago)

Representative Justin Amash of Michigan, a conservative with libertarian leanings, was stunned. As he walked back to his office, he said the episode was unfortunate, even though he was planning to vote against the measure. For the past month, since House leaders booted him off the budget committee, he has been railing against Boehner for his management style. But even Amash wondered whether the House GOP was making the right move. “Too many people in there were arguing that this thing is a tax increase, and I don’t think that’s what Boehner was trying to do,” he said. As much as he disagrees with Boehner’s approach, even he regretted how the speaker’s plan was killed.

Tiger Beat On The Potomac (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 21 December 2012 14:57 (twelve years ago)

Erick Erickson begins a piece with a lie:

Not a day goes by that I am not forced to confront the idea that I could be wrong about a lot

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:08 (twelve years ago)

but you omitted the best one:

Now, keep thinking I am wrong if you must, but stop pretending you don’t even understand my argument. It is pretty simple.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 December 2012 15:12 (twelve years ago)

I like to imagine him saying that to a mirror.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)

Gonna be a merry GOP Xmas back in the home districts

Raymond Cummings, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:26 (twelve years ago)

this is what a completely dysfunctional political institution looks like

Mordy, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:28 (twelve years ago)

Boehner with the same headache everyone else has.

Tiger Beat On The Potomac (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 21 December 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs1/1683333_o.gif

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 December 2012 15:35 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqFuhCfb3Fk

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

why on earth was that varnished turd crying all the time?

You're gonna need a fruit kebab. Trust. (stevie), Friday, 21 December 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

The booze.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Friday, 21 December 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile, Mitt sends out Christmas cards.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 15:58 (twelve years ago)

Charles Pierce has fun:

What happened to John Boehner last night, when the feral children put Boehner's balls inside a Christmas pinata and invited themselves to take a whack, couldn't have happened to a nicer fellow. Boehner himself chose to be king of the dipwads. He offered himself up as Speaker knowing full well that, in 2010, the country had elected itself a Congress straight out of the more fantastical chapters of Gullivers Travels. He had to have watched what happened thereafter, when the president put a deal on the table in 2011 that made him look like Dwight Eisenhower on a bad day, and Boehner couldn't sell it to the vandals in his caucus. He had to have watched as a vulnerable Democratic president got re-elected with ease, and brought a more liberal Democratic senatorial majority along with him, largely because the Republican presidential primary field was such a carnival of the politically insane that it even made an useless windsock like Willard Romney look like the wildest hair across Barry Goldwater's ass. Boehner had to know that there is no deal he could have brought back to his caucus -- no bargain, grand or otherwise, that he could sell -- because he no longer even is the putative leader of an actual political party. He is Speaker because somebody has to be, and he may not be Speaker for long, because it doesn't matter who is.

Read more: Daily Politics Blog - Charles P. Pierce - Political Blogging - Esquire http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/#ixzz2FhgGHxlt

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

limp boehner

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

weak boehner feeling very down this morning, may never rise to power again

"reading specialist" (Z S), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)

Well, he is facing very stiff opposition from the white house.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:48 (twelve years ago)

boehner (safe for work) pictures from yesterday:

http://i47.tinypic.com/esruxc.png

ahahahaha

http://i49.tinypic.com/25ils89.png

ahahahahaha

"reading specialist" (Z S), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:50 (twelve years ago)

that top one is from right after the meeting where boehner was like "dear catholic god, please give me the strength to do the right thing, i have failed, we have failed, god bless the usa let's go home for christmas"

"reading specialist" (Z S), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

I hope Reid in that picture is all like, "Are you gonna cry, John? Huh? Huh? Why don't you cry, you big crybaby?"

Gollum: "Hot, Ready and Smeagol!" (Phil D.), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

and then boehner did cwy. he did cwy like a big cwybaby

"reading specialist" (Z S), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:54 (twelve years ago)

anyway, speaker of the house paul ryan

*shudders*

"reading specialist" (Z S), Friday, 21 December 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

I don't think it matters who is speaker of the house at this point

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 16:55 (twelve years ago)

booker gonna run for senate not gov, epic battle for dirty jerz not happening :(

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 17:26 (twelve years ago)

booker gonna run for senate not gov, epic battle for dirty jerz not happening :(

except that Lautenberg doesn't appear ready to retire yet ... he'll be 90 in 2014, but no indication yet that's he quitting.

get it on smang a gong (Eisbaer), Friday, 21 December 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

Then Lautenberg ends up in some concrete...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

Booker is a p vile horseshitter

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 December 2012 17:57 (twelve years ago)

Challenge him for mayor.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

I spent the first ten years of my life in Newark; that'll do.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 December 2012 18:06 (twelve years ago)

Pretty sure Booker wasn't born yet then.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 21 December 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago)

I don't think it matters who is speaker of the house at this point

Oh, it does. it does. but not because anyone could control the tea party whackos.

the speaker has huge power in the House of Reps and will be the de facto leader of the party, setting the whole tone and agenda for them. boehner has been weak gruel who kowtows to the hard right faction, but his tone has beenequally wishy-washy.

if the whackos cast him aside for a true-blue ideologue, the lack of viable legislation will be exactly the same, but the tone will harden and the tactics will get much crazier. they'll overplay their hand even more egregiously than the past session. it remains to be seen how O will react to future games of 'chicken' over the budget ceiling. his record there has been less than impressive.

Aimless, Friday, 21 December 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

yeah I more or less agree w/ that I just meant legislation-wise, the # of 'less-whacko' republicans is the ultimate determinate of what meat comes out of the grinder and that # isn't gonna change

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 19:10 (twelve years ago)

A liberal defense of John Kerry (always have to remind myself he led the BCCI investigations):

Kerry is a good, safe choice for the job. He has made an entire Senate career out of taking on foreign-policy issues that nobody else — except Gary Hart — ever wanted to touch. He led the way in normalizing diplomatic relations with Vietnam at a time in which H. Ross Perot was still running around the country talking about thousands of American POW's in camps in Laos, and while the country was filling the theaters watching Sly Stallone as John Rambo, doing as good a job of revising that sad episode in American history as can be expected from an actor who sat out the war as the chaperone at a girls' school in Switzerland. He took on the rat's nest at the Bank Of Commerce And Credit International, when BCCI was laundering money for whoever came through the door, and when BCCI also had bought enough politicians in Washington that Kerry and his investigators were pretty much out there alone.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 December 2012 19:37 (twelve years ago)

Kelly, who finally came around to supporting the plan, was incredulous, according to Republicans in the room. As others headed for the door, Kelly raced to the front of the room and grabbed the microphone.

“Really,” he screamed, according to Republicans. “We can’t support our speaker?”

this party is doomed

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago)

is the Dem caucus + 25-vote margin of non-insane GOP House members enough to get a plan through (I'm assuming not...?)

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 20:31 (twelve years ago)

Just imagining some sort of former car dealer jackoff like that Kelly guy being a blowhard that way says so very much about that useless crew.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2012 20:34 (twelve years ago)

I think it is xpost

Gukbe, Friday, 21 December 2012 20:35 (twelve years ago)

what's the point of buying the republican party if they can't even get their shit together enough to vote for a bargaining leverage chip in fiscal cliff negotiations? corporate america's money would be better spent elsewhere

Mordy, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:20 (twelve years ago)

Yes maybe some glorious day in the far future corporate America will begin buying off the Democratic party.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:24 (twelve years ago)

lol "begin"

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

you can buy more than one party at a time - i just don't see the point of investing any more money in the republican party. total fail institution. it's throwing good money after bad.

Mordy, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:26 (twelve years ago)

otoh some people who are bankrolling the GOP are totally insane (Koch bros etc) and not really rational actors

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago)

that was the joke i think xxp

k3vin k., Friday, 21 December 2012 21:28 (twelve years ago)

the money that corporations put into politics is chump change for them

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:30 (twelve years ago)

Pretty sure Booker wasn't born yet then.

He was born when I was 7, smartguy, and grew up in the affluent town of Harrington Park, 20 miles from my hardscrabble North Ward.

this party is doomed

Could this promise be hurried up so we can start that second party that's worth a shit?

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:46 (twelve years ago)

if anything the slow collapse of the republican party ensures the continued existence of the democratic party

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:47 (twelve years ago)

sad but true

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:49 (twelve years ago)

hence their rightward march

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:49 (twelve years ago)

absorbing available electoral territory

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:49 (twelve years ago)

they're just names anyway

iatee, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:50 (twelve years ago)

SPEED IT UP A LITTLE xxxxp

lib defense of Kerry relies solely on events 20+ years old.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:50 (twelve years ago)

is the Dem caucus + 25-vote margin of non-insane GOP House members enough to get a plan through (I'm assuming not...?)

did the boehner plan fall apart because of non-insane republicans or because of the really insane, ideologically rigid ones who were too dumb to understand what was going on?

wk, Friday, 21 December 2012 21:53 (twelve years ago)

the latter

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:54 (twelve years ago)

he couldn't get enough of his caucus to vote for ANY tax increase

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 21:54 (twelve years ago)

Obama just read his statement that he wants Congress to agree now to agree to middle class tax cuts; and that he's still in talks with Boehner.

curmudgeon, Friday, 21 December 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

agree now to middle class tax cuts which is at the $250,000 level

curmudgeon, Friday, 21 December 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago)

why is he even bothering to talk with Boehner, dude has proven his worthlessness

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 21 December 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago)

no one else to talk to, plus boehner still controls the agenda on the floor of the house, so nothing comes to a vote he doesn't want voted on.

Aimless, Friday, 21 December 2012 22:59 (twelve years ago)

boehner jams 2013

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 21 December 2012 23:03 (twelve years ago)

“He wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life."

I'm betting Tagg Romney could walk out any day of the year and meet five people who wanted to be president less than his dad. And on most days they'd be the first five. He needs to grow up and stop sounding like an unreflective idiot.

Aimless, Sunday, 23 December 2012 20:04 (twelve years ago)

Julius Caesar didn't want to be Emperor, either, according to Shakespeare.

get it on smang a gong (Eisbaer), Sunday, 23 December 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

pretty sure i've never met anyone who wanted to be president

"reading specialist" (Z S), Sunday, 23 December 2012 20:19 (twelve years ago)

I knew a kid in elementary school whose mom assured everyone in earshot that "my little Juan" was going to be president.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 23 December 2012 20:23 (twelve years ago)

And that little boy, who nobody liked, grew up to be... Mitt Romney.

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 23 December 2012 21:19 (twelve years ago)

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/12/18/new-south-carolina-bill-pushes-jail-sentences-for-state-workers-implementing-obamacare/

I'm no lawyer, but this has to be symbolic, right? There's no way this type of sentence could survive a Supreme Court Appeal?

Opposition to "Obamacare" is largely silly because it is not as if the provisions will not be enacted if they do not comply, but rather it means the Federal government will then step in and implement it, without the State getting a say. So when faced with a choice between implementing something you don't like, but given a say on how to do it, or having someone else do it for you without your input, you choose to make an infantile, silly symbolic stance your Final Offer?

NINO CARTER, Sunday, 23 December 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

Rationality is not a Republican strength lately, but they do understand the power of tantrums, symbols, gestures, and appealing to the id.

Aimless, Sunday, 23 December 2012 21:30 (twelve years ago)

Still though, I would think the White House would have something to say about this. Maybe they just haven't had time, or maybe they're just waiting?

I'm not a violent person and don't wish harm on anybody, but with that being said, there is a growing faction of people who could choke on their vomit in their sleep to which my reaction would be an "eh" and a dull shrug.

NINO CARTER, Sunday, 23 December 2012 21:34 (twelve years ago)

ice cold, nino. ice cold

k3vin k., Sunday, 23 December 2012 22:54 (twelve years ago)

lol

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/23/politics/idaho-senator-dui-arrest/index.html

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 24 December 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)

Oh crap, Crapo

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:00 (twelve years ago)

According to his official biography on congress.gov, Crapo is also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which prohibits the use of alcohol among its members.

You're gonna need a fruit kebab. Trust. (stevie), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:06 (twelve years ago)

somehow we'll figure out how all of this is Obama's fault

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

obama drove him to drink which drove him to drive

Todd Terragh - "It's the Harps" (m bison), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:15 (twelve years ago)

it's kinda sad how the 'he was drinking alcohol' puts his career more at risk than the 'he was drinking and driving'

iatee, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:21 (twelve years ago)

also big reveal his name is crapo more impt than DUI dickishness

Todd Terragh - "It's the Harps" (m bison), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

his best strategy to protect himself from being primaried in idaho is to ensure that he is literally the craziest person in the senate for the rest of his term

iatee, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:24 (twelve years ago)

drunk driving his car into the senate jumping out biting senators

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW7Z20fJH6I (lag∞n), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:25 (twelve years ago)

his next election is 2016 he will survive this for sure

plus rural areas drunk drive all the time

iatee, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

mormons typically don't

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:46 (twelve years ago)

mormons make up 25% of idaho voters and inevitably a larger % of gop primary voters but even if half of those turn on mr. crap and care about this 4 years from now that's prob not enough? again he has 4 years to brand himself as the craziest mofo around.

iatee, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

jack mormons yo

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

secret mormon drinkers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW7Z20fJH6I (lag∞n), Monday, 24 December 2012 16:57 (twelve years ago)

I wonder if any bartenders at MSP would recognize this guy.

pplains, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

there are easy things he hasn't even done yet, like join the klan

iatee, Monday, 24 December 2012 16:59 (twelve years ago)

naturally no paper will carry this story:

On Jan. 1, 2000, the world awoke to find that little had changed since the night before. After years of hype around what was then called Y2K -- the fear that computer systems across the globe would collapse, unable to handle the year shifting from '99 to '00 -- the date change turned out to be a momentous non-event.

Next week, the United States is in for much the same, after months of frantic hype about the economic disruption that awaits if Congress and the president fail to reach a deal and the federal government goes "over the fiscal cliff." (The difference between Y2K and the fiscal cliff being that computer programmers worked around the clock to ensure the former was a non-event.)

The so-called fiscal cliff is a combination of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1. But the agencies responsible for implementing those changes, including the IRS and the Pentagon, are well aware that congressional and White House negotiators will most likely come to some sort of deal within weeks or months -- and so they are planning to carry on as usual, according to a broad review of private and public government plans.

In other words, there will be no cliff. There won't even be a slope. Congress and the president can have their public and private dramas, but the government officials responsible for carrying out their eventual orders have seen this movie before, and they know how it ends.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 December 2012 21:14 (twelve years ago)

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/12/did-syria-just-use-nerve-gas/

Mordy, Monday, 24 December 2012 22:00 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/freedomworks-tea-party-group-nearly-falls-apart-in-fight-between-old-and-new-guard/2012/12/25/dd095b68-4545-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_print.html

On the dissolution of FreedomWorks. I'm interested in two bits:

1) The fact that these people are children who had to pack heat to throw each other out:

The day after Labor Day, just as campaign season was entering its final frenzy, FreedomWorks, the Washington-based tea party organization, went into free fall.

Richard K. Armey, the group’s chairman and a former House majority leader, walked into the group’s Capitol Hill offices with his wife, Susan, and an aide holstering a handgun at his waist. The aim was to seize control of the group and expel Armey’s enemies: The gun-wielding assistant escorted FreedomWorks’ top two employees off the premises, while Armey suspended several others who broke down in sobs at the news.

2) and

According to public records, FreedomWorks received more than $12 millionbefore the election from two corporations based in Knoxville, Tenn.: Specialty Investments Group and Kingston Pike Development.

Kingston Pike is the big suburban drag that connects the exurbs that my parents retired to to Knoxville.

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 18:46 (twelve years ago)

I feel like all gop disputes should be resolved by hostile armed takeover from here on out.

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 19:35 (twelve years ago)

only by a Dick Armey.

pplains, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 19:56 (twelve years ago)

after the takeover, armey got paid $8 mil to go away?!? that's fucking amazing!

goodbye normative genes (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago)

also amazing that they didn't seek to have him prosecuted.

get it on smang a gong (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 21:06 (twelve years ago)

At least he's not a whore when it comes to his most cherished principles.

Canaille help you (Michael White), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 21:52 (twelve years ago)

fiscal cliff just got a whole lot steeper:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/fiscal-cliff-gets-a-little-steeper-geithner-tells-congress-u-s-will-hit-debt-ceiling-limit-on-dec-31/

Mordy, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:00 (twelve years ago)

extraordinary circumstances
extraordinary measures
incredible assholes

"reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:18 (twelve years ago)

Geithner says that the measures that the Treasury Department is considering will add approximately two months to the debt limit.

They've got plenty of time to screw this up

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:44 (twelve years ago)

obama should just unilaterally raise it. print platinum coins or whatever crazy shit they've been murmuring about.

Mordy, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:46 (twelve years ago)

republicans are going to get us credit downgraded again unless obama reassures world market that the us has its shit together

Mordy, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:46 (twelve years ago)

if only we had our shit together!

"reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:48 (twelve years ago)

by international standards we do. us economy is in a very strong place. it's just that our political situation is pretty fucked.

Mordy, Wednesday, 26 December 2012 23:49 (twelve years ago)

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/supreme_court_emergency_contraception_stays_in_obamacare/

Mordy, Thursday, 27 December 2012 01:34 (twelve years ago)

Someone should tell Hobby Lobby, et al, that "Thou shalt not kill" is a religious commandment literally carved in rock, and that ten times the amount of money they are griping about goes towards killing people, and that this has been going on for hundreds of years.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 27 December 2012 01:54 (twelve years ago)

a $1.3 million daily fine sounds awesome, we should have more of those

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 27 December 2012 02:00 (twelve years ago)

on further review, what is the Hobby Lobby doing dispensing medication to begin with

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 27 December 2012 02:03 (twelve years ago)

oh lol never mind

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 27 December 2012 02:03 (twelve years ago)

sweet link mordy

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 27 December 2012 06:47 (twelve years ago)

gonna read it all eventually

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Thursday, 27 December 2012 06:48 (twelve years ago)

"This pamphlet was written collaboratively by a group of people of color, women, and queers – and is offered in deep solidarity with anyone committed to ending identity-based oppression and exploitation materially."

El Tomboto, Thursday, 27 December 2012 07:02 (twelve years ago)

hi try reading more than one sentence i know it's hard

Tome Cruise (Matt P), Thursday, 27 December 2012 08:06 (twelve years ago)

hi

buzza, Thursday, 27 December 2012 08:09 (twelve years ago)

just got this memo at work from Lisa Jackson:

Four years ago this month, then President-elect Barack Obama nominated me to be the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, where 21 years earlier I had begun my career in public service as an environmental engineer in the Superfund program. Who says you can’t go home again?

It was a poignant homecoming, and it has been an extraordinary honor to be the champion of the EPA’s dedicated women and men and our vital mission to protect human health and the environment in communities across our great nation. I have witnessed your resolve to make things better for the American people, felt the passion that compels you to go above and beyond for communities in need and marveled at the grace with which you serve the public. So it is both easy and difficult to tell you, my colleagues, that I will be leaving the EPA shortly after the President’s State of the Union address.

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:28 (twelve years ago)

oh, guess it's in the NYT now and everything. i thought i had cool breaking news

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:34 (twelve years ago)

it was breaking to me

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:35 (twelve years ago)

ugh, so sad that the epitaph of her 4 years has to be

Ms. Jackson’s departure comes as many in the environmental movement are questioning Mr. Obama’s commitment to dealing with climate change and other environmental problems. After his re-election, and a campaign in which global warming was barely mentioned by either candidate, Mr. Obama said that his first priority would be jobs and the economy and that he intended only to foster a “conversation” on climate change in the coming months.

That ambivalence is a far cry from the hopes that accompanied his early months in office, when he identified climate change as one of humanity’s defining challenges. Mr. Obama put the White House’s full lobbying power behind a House cap-and-trade bill that would have limited climate-altering emissions and brought profound changes in how the nation produces and consumes energy.

But after the effort stalled in the Senate, the administration abandoned broad-scale climate change efforts, instead focusing on smaller regulatory actions largely though the Clean Air Act.

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:37 (twelve years ago)

really loving this "conversation" about climate change. it's just as productive as this great conversation on guns!

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:38 (twelve years ago)

paragraphs like that last one really should not be written w/o mentioning the filibuster

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:40 (twelve years ago)

really loving this "conversation" about climate change. it's just as productive as this great conversation on guns!

brutal post ZS, A+ imo

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago)

conversation doesnt necessarily make anything happen but nothing happens without it

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:42 (twelve years ago)

i mean i share yr frustration but dont pick on conversation, its not fair

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:43 (twelve years ago)

"what do you think about climate change?"
(Heroically) "well, **I** happen to believe that it **IS** happening - **AND** that it is man-made!!"
"such courage! you are truly amazing, senator, and i would like to invite you to participate in my golf tournament fundraiser in April. it's the 6th annual Cartwright County 27-hole Challenge, and i really think it's going to be special this year."
"**AND** we should do something about climate change!"
"yes, someone certainly should do something about it, that's just terrific"

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

stuff will happen if the dems win the house in 2016, it won't if they don't, talking doesn't change much

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:44 (twelve years ago)

er 2014, but also 2016

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:45 (twelve years ago)

yeah its sort of unfair to subtweet obama like that article does, he really pushed the house to pass cap n trade even tho a lot of them thought it wasnt worth it cause it wouldnt make it past the filibuster which it didnt, obvs ted kennedy dying didnt help, theres certainly an argument to be made that he couldve talked abt climate change more, which is imho worthwhile in the long term as far as framing the argument, but it doesnt get legislation passed

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:47 (twelve years ago)

great conversation!

and anyway, what exactly does "having a conversation" even mean? what is the national conversation? who is participating in the conversation? does it just mean that it's a topic on the sunday morning news shows and that david gregory is going to invite a reasonable person + some industry guy who strictly adheres to talking points to debate the issue for 10 minutes in front of a national audience? does it mean that tom friedman will weave the topic into a delicious pun in one of his columns?

who the fuck cares about conversations?

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

the prob is the more he talks about it the more it becomes 'a political issue' instead of a science/common sense one. this is why high info republicans are less likely to believe in global warming than low info republicans.

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:49 (twelve years ago)

there is obvs something false and deceptive abt the term national conversation, but as far as just conversation nothing gets done that requires more than one person without it, and even if our duplicitous overlords are seeking nothing more than to stall via conversation its a good thing for people to be talking and caring about the environnent gun control etc, not talking or caring about them certainly doesnt work, if people care enough something will get done

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:53 (twelve years ago)

one solution would be to make guns only legal in flood plains

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

Based on my experience being home for the holidays, the "conversation" is going to amount to one side saying "Yes, so there is this global warming thing" and the other side going "It's a conspiracy - have you ever noticed who is the biggest champion of global warming?" "What? What does it mean to be a 'champion' of global warming? How is it a conspiracy?" "Mmm-hmmm, that's right! AL GORE!"

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:54 (twelve years ago)

well the good thing is you dont have to convince absolutely everyone

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)

the prob is the more he talks about it the more it becomes 'a political issue' instead of a science/common sense one. this is why high info republicans are less likely to believe in global warming than low info republicans.

― iatee, Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:49 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah its obvs a pretty delicate operation, but i feel like advocating is prob better than just taking it off the table

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

yeah, agreed that a 'conversation' of some sort has to occur. it makes sense on some issues. it doesn't make sense on climate. but climate has been talked to death. scientists know what the problem is. we know how to address it (even though it's too late to fix it because we've been having a lovely conversation about it for 24 years now). scientists understand the urgency.

should we have a conversation on gravity?

having a national conversation (still can't type that without barfing in my mouth a little) is great if the intention behind it is to have the conversation be the first step toward meaningful action. but when it's used in the context of climate, that's just bullshit. it's punting. the next president will do something on it (or not). until then, we'll have a conversation...about scientific facts?

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:01 (twelve years ago)

well the good thing is you dont have to convince absolutely everyone

i dunno, this guy is a pretty big wheel in the Cold Stone and Great American Cookie franchise empires

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:02 (twelve years ago)

well it's more that democrats need to inform low-info democrats that climate is the #1 issue and to vote accordingly. it's slowly happening.

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:03 (twelve years ago)

it sucks that people dont believe in global warming and science but thats where were at, i do think all the bad weather has left an opening for people who are on the fence to be convinced just as the murder of children has done for gun control, but i dont think the conversation is solely about whether its real, its about what to do about it too

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:05 (twelve years ago)

i'm not sure that the 'it's too late to do anything' rhetoric is useful for convincing people to take action, even if you believe it's true

Mordy, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

like there are people who believe its real who dont think its worth it to do something cause of the economy or w/e bullshit, and there are people who arent sure its real who are convincible that its real, repeated weather catastrophes help the case, as does the republican party repeatedly outing themselves as insane ill intentioned idiots

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:07 (twelve years ago)

'it's too late to do anything' really doesnt make any sense because even tho weve changed the environment theres still the decision of where to go from there

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:08 (twelve years ago)

yeah its sort of unfair to subtweet obama like that article does, he really pushed the house to pass cap n trade even tho a lot of them thought it wasnt worth it cause it wouldnt make it past the filibuster which it didnt, obvs ted kennedy dying didnt help, theres certainly an argument to be made that he couldve talked abt climate change more, which is imho worthwhile in the long term as far as framing the argument, but it doesnt get legislation passed

i hate the filibuster too, and of course it's wrong to lay the blame of the failed climate bill solely at obama's feet. but man, his lackluster support - prodded by rahm and axelrod, who don't give a shit about the environment - of the bill when it crucially needed it really hurt. Eric Pooley's The Climate War is a great, great book that I would recommend to anyone interested in the origins of environmental legislation to put a price on carbon, along with the repeated failures. this is a good excerpt describing how obama let a golden opportunity slip through his fingers:

… the disaster in the Gulf should have been a critical turning point for global warming. Handled correctly, the BP spill should have been to climate legislation what September 11th was to the Patriot Act, or the financial collapse was to the bank bailout. Disasters drive sweeping legislation, and precedent was on the side of a great leap forward in environmental progress. In 1969, an oil spill in Santa Barbara, California – of only 100,000 barrels, less than the two-day output of the BP gusher – prompted Richard Nixon to create the EPA and sign the Clean Air Act.

But the Obama administration let the opportunity slip away. On June 15th, the president – a communicator whom even top Republican operatives rank above Reagan – sat at his desk to deliver his first address to the nation from the Oval Office. It was a terrible, teachable moment, one in which he could have connected the dots between the oil spewing into the Gulf and the planet-killing CO2 we spew every day into the atmosphere. But Obama never even mentioned the words “carbon” or “emissions” or “greenhouse” – not even the word “pollution.” The president’s sole mention of “climate” came in a glancing description of the “comprehensive energy and climate bill” that the House passed. In a moment that cried out for direction-setting from the nation’s chief executive, Obama brought no concrete ideas to the table. Restating the need to break our addiction to fossil fuels, he stared at the camera and confessed that “we don’t yet know precisely how we’re going to get there.” He didn’t challenge Americans to examine their own energy habits. He didn’t rally his fellow Democrats into a fight with the Republican Party of “Smokey” Joe Barton, the Texas Republican who later apologized to BP. Far from offering a clarion call for action, Obama said, meekly, that he would listen to give senators from both parties a “fair hearing in the months ahead.” Then he asked us to pray.

Climate advocates were stunned. “That speech wasn’t anything different than Bush gave in an energy address,” says Pica. “There was nothing new about climate and energy – it didn’t move the debate forward. If he was going to recycle the same old talking points, maybe he should have just let Robert Gibbs give a little talk about it to the press corps.”

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:09 (twelve years ago)

if yr argument rests on how he used the bully pulpit im warning you i am a bully pulpit sceptic, theres a lot of science to back this up fwiw

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:11 (twelve years ago)

yeah omg he didn't use the magic power of speech to change reality

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

and iirc he did put in backroom work as far as leaning on the house to pass the bill, which prob did more than any public speech could, but on the other hand like i said i dont think just not talking abt it is the way to go either

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:12 (twelve years ago)

a communicator whom even top Republican operatives rank above Reagan

lol

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

Disasters drive sweeping legislation, and precedent was on the side of a great leap forward in environmental progress.

the key sentence. the only, ONLY good thing about disasters is their potential to catalyze progressive legislation. the environmental program i work for was created from a terrible disaster - in a distant country, no less! - that killed tens of thousands of people. it should catalyze change. not just a conversation, but conversation surrounding legislation.

this applies to the newtown tragedy, too, of course

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:13 (twelve years ago)

the thing about "conversations" is you can have them when there's an honest disagreement. that's not the case with climate change - to engage in a "conversation" where "both sides" hold forth is to allow the wrong & disingenuous side to delay action. a "conversation" on climate change = preemptive Republican filibustering. the starting point of the conversation needs to be "nobody who doesn't accept the scientific consensus has any business participating in this 'conversation.'"

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:14 (twelve years ago)

people are educatable, not all of them, but some people who dont now believe the scientific consensus will soon, and anyway its kinda a fasle binary in that its not the only issue in the conversation

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

oil spill happened after the dems had already taken a huge political hit for obamacare. approval rating was already pretty low and it already looked like the dems were gonna get killed in congress. context matters.

in retrospect a climate bill probably could have happened *instead* of obamacare but not along w/

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)

and iirc he did put in backroom work as far as leaning on the house to pass the bill, which prob did more than any public speech could, but on the other hand like i said i dont think just not talking abt it is the way to go either

the administration put in backroom work (with the result of catering to the interests of big coal and big oil and not picking up any gop votes in the process), but i'm not sure you can characterize their involvement as enthusiastic.

Climate Bill, R.I.P.:

From the start, Obama has led from behind on climate change. Shortly after he took office, the White House seemed inconvenienced when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made climate change a top priority, moving swiftly to push a cap on carbon pollution through the House. Rep. Henry Waxman, who played an instrumental role in the legislation, was frustrated by the White House's refusal to come up with specifics to guide the effort. "Browner tried to produce a detailed policy position," says Eric Pooley, author of the just-published The Climate War, a definitive account of the legislative fight. "But that effort was blocked." Obama's top political advisers, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, pointedly avoided the legislative battle, viewing it as politically unwinnable.

So Waxman moved on his own. Working with Rep. Ed Markey, he caught the White House off guard by cutting the difficult political compromises that were necessary to gain the support of coal-state Democrats and bringing the bill to a vote. It took Al Gore sitting down with Emanuel and going over voting lists, name by name, to persuade the White House to throw its muscle behind the bill and pressure congressional holdouts to fall in line.

but on the other hand like i said i dont think just not talking abt it is the way to go either[

don't get me wrong, i'm not saying don't talk about it. on the contrary i wish he WOULD talk about it, and use the words global warming and climate change. what i'm saying is that talking about it is not enough, and that's all they've done, and that's all they're going to do. and that strategy, by itself, is completely pointless.

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

it's not pointless if it gets most dem voters to think about it as the next and most important political issue, even if it is pointless in terms of things that can happen on 12/27/2012 or even a year from now

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:26 (twelve years ago)

It took Al Gore sitting down with Emanuel and going over voting lists, name by name, to persuade the White House to throw its muscle behind the bill and pressure congressional holdouts to fall in line.

im not saying this is an ideal level of enthusiasm but this certainly implies that they did come around and whip those last crucial votes up, which kinda puts the lie to

what i'm saying is that talking about it is not enough, and that's all they've done

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:27 (twelve years ago)

and fwiw they were right that it was politically unwinnable

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:28 (twelve years ago)

that's all they've done since the rise of the tea party, i mean

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:28 (twelve years ago)

that's all they have done on literally every single political issue since the rise of the tea party

iatee, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

haha

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago)

they saved the country!
http://i50.tinypic.com/35btopt.jpg

"reading specialist" (Z S), Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:31 (twelve years ago)

what fn weirds

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 December 2012 16:32 (twelve years ago)

why can't they just get into King Arthur like normal LARPers

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 December 2012 17:29 (twelve years ago)

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=297444

things that are jokes pretty much (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Thursday, 27 December 2012 19:45 (twelve years ago)

is Mitch about to bite John's neck?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 27 December 2012 21:25 (twelve years ago)

Blobfish don't have teeth iirc

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 27 December 2012 21:27 (twelve years ago)

i dont really know anything abt this dude but im glad hes someone whos proven he can get elected to congress, hopefully pres brown will figure the governorship is his safer play http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rep-markey-to-run-for-kerrys-senate-seat

lag∞n, Friday, 28 December 2012 16:17 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/r0LVm.png

cool district bruh

lag∞n, Friday, 28 December 2012 16:23 (twelve years ago)

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Calif.

http://www.playoffrace.com/Images/NFL/Chargers.gif

pplains, Friday, 28 December 2012 16:52 (twelve years ago)

http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/29500/Yellow-dolphin---29841.jpg

pplains, Friday, 28 December 2012 16:53 (twelve years ago)

The Boston Globe story linked earlier really is the best strategy narative I've read about the campaign:
http://bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/12/23/the-story-behind-mitt-romney-loss-presidential-campaign-president-obama/OeZRabbooIw0z7QYAOyFFP/story.html?src=longreads&utm_source=buffer&buffer_share=1198e

your damn bass clarinet (Eazy), Friday, 28 December 2012 19:49 (twelve years ago)

The premise of Romney's top advisors appears to be that, after two extensive runs for president in both 2008 and 2012, totalling at least two full years in the public eye, during which time Romney spent something like a BILLION dollars informing the public about himself, that in the final analysis voters really had a very poor understanding of him and what a really swell person he was and what a great president he'd be. If only they had known, they'd have voted correctly, the poor dears.

As self-serving apologies go, this one is dreadful.

Aimless, Friday, 28 December 2012 20:01 (twelve years ago)

Key quotes to me are:

Now I know what they were doing with all the staffs and ­offices,” [Romney political director] Beeson said. “They were literally creating a one-to-one contact with voters,” something that Romney did not have the staff to match.

and

A key difference was the depth of voter contact. Romney took comfort in polls that showed voters had been contacted equally by both campaigns. But the polls were misleading, perhaps equating a recorded robocall on the phone with a house call by a worker.

“It wasn’t well understood what they were doing,” Newhouse said. “We asked the question in polls, ‘Have you been contacted by campaigns?’ Our overall contact was pretty similar. But their in-person contact was beating us by 3 to 2.”

It reflects both what worked for Ralph Reed a decade ago and the trouble with mass-marketing in the Facebook age. For me, the Sandy food drive and soup kitchen photo ops were the clumsiest examples of this: something that was supposed to play well on, I don't know, the evening news with Walter Cronkite.

your damn bass clarinet (Eazy), Friday, 28 December 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

Romney didn't need as many paid staff as Obama had, running as many campaign offices as Obama had, because Romney didn't have nearly enough volunteers to justify paying a bunch more staff to coordinate them. He didn't have the volunteers because the activists who tend to volunteer mostly disliked him. This was blindingly apparent to everyone during the primaries.

So, his campaign made a gazillion robocalls and pretended this was a good strategy. This was obvious in the last month of the campaign, too. I remember pointing it out back in late October on ilx.

His campaign could have sought out Santorum and Bachmann to campaign extensively and visibly for him, but that just points up his fundamental dilemma, bcz the more he tied himself to the party's whack jobs, the more ground he'd lose among swing voters.

Basically he lost bcz Obama governed from slightly right of middle and left Romney no space to stand on to argue he was any better.

Aimless, Friday, 28 December 2012 20:22 (twelve years ago)

So FISA law renewed for another five years, with Dianne Fienstein being particularly nasty yesterday about cowing senators into voting for it.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 28 December 2012 20:24 (twelve years ago)

my takeaway from that article is that Tagg Romney is fucking scary and now I hate even more how he showed up on 30 Rock

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 28 December 2012 20:57 (twelve years ago)

what are you talking about

GIMME SOME REGGAE (DJP), Friday, 28 December 2012 21:36 (twelve years ago)

fuck FISA btw that is bullshit

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 28 December 2012 22:36 (twelve years ago)

pretty sure that wasn't tagg romney on 30 Rock but in fact was an actor.

Clay, Friday, 28 December 2012 23:40 (twelve years ago)

no that was garrett romney

max, Saturday, 29 December 2012 00:09 (twelve years ago)

http://escalatingidentity.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/who-is-oakland-anti-oppression-politics-decolonization-and-the-state/

― Mordy, Wednesday, December 26, 2012 9:56 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I read through most of this, skipped/skimmed a couple of the sections. It's some powerful writing, though I think the authors misconstrue or misrepresent discourse about privilege, at least in so far as I have come to understand it. Of course it also just highlights to me how perverse it is that I agree with a lot of the authors' political stances and yet find myself completely unmoved to abandon my new job working for a certain tax-dodging internet retailer and take up arms against…someone.

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Saturday, 29 December 2012 06:45 (twelve years ago)

if you're not guilty you have nothing to etc.

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/senate_fisa_vote_inspiring_display_of_bipartisan_commitment_to_ignoring_fourth_amendment/

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 29 December 2012 07:31 (twelve years ago)

yeah that whole thing pretty despicable

Gukbe, Saturday, 29 December 2012 07:39 (twelve years ago)

shoot Feinstein into space.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 29 December 2012 13:17 (twelve years ago)

I read through most of this, skipped/skimmed a couple of the sections. It's some powerful writing, though I think the authors misconstrue or misrepresent discourse about privilege, at least in so far as I have come to understand it. Of course it also just highlights to me how perverse it is that I agree with a lot of the authors' political stances and yet find myself completely unmoved to abandon my new job working for a certain tax-dodging internet retailer and take up arms against…someone.

― autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Saturday, December 29, 2012 1:45 AM (22 hours ago)

I thought it was provocative in a way that American political writing rarely is. I'm sympathetic to their critique of privilege but it's so easy to go around in a circle re this. Maybe it's not in everyone's power to physically rebel, and doesn't a little political correctness demonstrate some important symbolic importance etc? And then you can re-critique the new assertion - compromise is always both 'at least something' and 'putting off the ultimate revolution.' You get something often symbolic and lose something often tangible. idk. But a good read I thought.

Mordy, Sunday, 30 December 2012 04:57 (twelve years ago)

Can't believe Hillary is faking a blood clot to get out of answering for her Benghazi conspiracy.

(that's going to be so tasteless if this goes wrong)

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 01:24 (twelve years ago)

new years eve is the ultimate news-dumping friday:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/31/world/africa/obama-blames-sloppiness-for-benghazi-attack.html

Mordy, Monday, 31 December 2012 01:26 (twelve years ago)

WASHINGTON — Negotiations over a last-ditch agreement to head off large tax increases and sweeping spending cuts in the new year appeared to resume on Sunday afternoon after Republican senators withdrew a demand that any deal must include a new way of calculating inflation that would lower payments to beneficiary programs like Social Security and slow their growth.

Mordy, Monday, 31 December 2012 02:06 (twelve years ago)

Get well, Hillary

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 31 December 2012 02:08 (twelve years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/30/the-republican-party-in-one-tweet/

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 02:08 (twelve years ago)

“The offers that I’ve made to them have been so fair that a lot of Democrats get mad at me,” Obama said.

ass

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 02:39 (twelve years ago)

feelin kinda morby

goodbye normative genes (Hunt3r), Monday, 31 December 2012 02:40 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, that kind of line can only lead to a "Morbs OTM" from me.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 31 December 2012 05:12 (twelve years ago)

“The offers that I’ve made to them have been so fair that a lot of Democrats get mad at me,” Obama said.

ass

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

obama otm

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 14:47 (twelve years ago)

Funny post on High Heat Stats today, a baseball site:

http://www.highheatstats.com/2012/12/biggest-cliffs/#more-8920

At the end of this post is a table of the major league players who have been known as “Cliff”, listed in descending order of career WAR (total WAR for position players, pitching WAR for pitchers)...

clemenza, Monday, 31 December 2012 14:52 (twelve years ago)

do you guys really think obama should be saying 'the offers I made are things that will please democrats and make republicans angry'? getting mad about things people say in a political bargaining session is like getting mad about things some pro wrestler says before a match.

iatee, Monday, 31 December 2012 14:56 (twelve years ago)

Really, he should have trotted out his Brando impression from 60 Minutes a few years ago. (Fill in the line yourself.)

clemenza, Monday, 31 December 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago)

do you guys really think obama should be saying 'the offers I made are things that will please democrats and make republicans angry'? getting mad about things people say in a political bargaining session is like getting mad about things some pro wrestler says before a match.

― iatee, Monday, December 31, 2012 9:56 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i'm not sure there's any rational reason to believe he's being dishonest

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:11 (twelve years ago)

lol wut

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:14 (twelve years ago)

my point is regardless of what kind of deal he's actually offering 'democrats hate this!' is the only way to be framing it

iatee, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:15 (twelve years ago)

I hope despite the framing and the substance, Congressional Dems show they hate it by rejecting it. And maybe enough Republicans will reject it too.

curmudgeon, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:33 (twelve years ago)

Or reject it because of Obama's framing and substance

curmudgeon, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:39 (twelve years ago)

im gonna go ahead and hold my outrage until theres an actual deal

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:42 (twelve years ago)

the endless expert negotiation analysis of fake deals is so tedious

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:49 (twelve years ago)

i mean the endless expert negotiation analysis of real deals is pretty tedious too but hey free country

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

NYT blog:

Senate Democrats are pushing back hard on a deal that Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Senator Mitch McConnell are closing in on, objecting vociferously to any compromise that suspends automatic across-the-board spending cuts for any time frame short of a year.

A senior Senate Democratic aide said a one-year “pause” in those cuts — known as sequestration — is nonnegotiable. Mr. McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader, has suggested a three-month suspension, according to officials knowledgeable about the negotiations.

Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa, one of the Democratic Party’s most senior liberals, took to the Senate floor to suggest that he will oppose the deal that is coming together.


“As I see this thing developing, as I have said, no deal is better than a bad deal,” Mr. Harkin said, “and this is a very bad deal, the way things are shaping up.”

Democratic officials stressed that no deal yet exists, but phone calls between Mr. Biden and Mr. McConnell have moved negotiations forward. Talks center on allowing tax rates to rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent on incomes over $450,000 for married couples, an extension of unemployment insurance and a provision to prevent the alternative minimum tax from expanding into the middle class starting on Tuesday. Negotiators are still apart on a tax regimen for inherited estates, but according to a Democratic aide, Mr. Biden has suggested a 40 percent tax rate on the value of estates over $4 million. That would split the difference between the Democratic demand for a 45 percent rate on estates over $3.5 million and the Republican position of a 35 percent rate on inheritances over $5 million. Mr. Biden has also suggested allowing tax rates to rise on singles earning more than $400,000 a year. On Sunday, Democrats had wanted that threshold set at $360,000.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:50 (twelve years ago)

heres this fwiw o lord http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2012/12/31/the-case-for-the-dems-negotiating-strategy

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:51 (twelve years ago)

im gonna go ahead and hold my outrage until theres an actual deal

― lag∞n, Monday, December 31, 2012 12:42 PM (10 minutes ago)

sure, but we can take him at his word while that's all we have to go on. and given his history, it's not unreasonable

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:54 (twelve years ago)

my point is regardless of what kind of deal he's actually offering 'democrats hate this!' is the only way to be framing it

― iatee, Monday, December 31, 2012 12:15 PM (39 minutes ago)

democrats hate him
learn how to be a socialist president with this one weird trick

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:55 (twelve years ago)

wait, $450k?

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

lol at everyone getting all morbs at some substance free posturing by obama on a sunday show

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 17:58 (twelve years ago)

yeah, lie-la-lie on 250 went by the boards before he could belch his victory supper. Surprised? xp

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 17:59 (twelve years ago)

how about his robo-lying about $250K+ for a solid year, maybe the Bamites can get angry about that j0e? (i'm sure they'll HOLD HIS FEET TO THE FIRE. SOMEHOW.)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 18:00 (twelve years ago)

joe will wait to see the actual deal and then reason that surely this was the best we could have done

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago)

I thought you guys were talking about joe biden at first

iatee, Monday, 31 December 2012 18:01 (twelve years ago)

how about his robo-lying about $250K+ for a solid year, maybe the Bamites can get angry about that j0e? (i'm sure they'll HOLD HIS FEET TO THE FIRE. SOMEHOW.)

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, December 31, 2012 1:00 PM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

its fine to get mad abt that, like i said ill wait til it actually happens (and i will weight it against what was received in exchange for raising the level, tho id understand if people dont really care abt that)

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

why would anyone care nobody itt is currently on unemployment

iatee, Monday, 31 December 2012 18:03 (twelve years ago)

joe will wait to see the actual deal and then reason that surely this was the best we could have done

― fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, December 31, 2012 1:01 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

*bows to kevins obviously superior grasp of psychic game theory*

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 18:04 (twelve years ago)

I'd get mad at O for this if the process wasn't so fucked.

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 18:52 (twelve years ago)

why would anyone care nobody itt is currently on unemployment

― iatee, Monday, December 31, 2012 1:03 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah what kinda sap cares about other people amirite?

Gollum: "Hot, Ready and Smeagol!" (Phil D.), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:01 (twelve years ago)

he means intense testicular tension

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:03 (twelve years ago)

Unemployment apparently extended in this possible deal.

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 19:05 (twelve years ago)

yeah any deal dems cut is gonna extend unemployment obv

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:08 (twelve years ago)

sunrise also included

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:09 (twelve years ago)

back to important stuff, GG on the FISA Cheneyism of Feinstein, Reid and Obama:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/28/fisa-feinstein-obama-democrats-eavesdropping

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:24 (twelve years ago)

This is fun: bagging on the worst pundit columns this year, many of which we've spoken of ourselves

http://m.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/12/worst-columns-2012/59720/

"It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Drunk!" (kingfish), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:42 (twelve years ago)

i find i dont need terrible pundits when ilx is here

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:51 (twelve years ago)

i find i dont need incoherent man screaming on corner

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 19:53 (twelve years ago)

I don't need incoherent men screaming when I've got The Corner.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 31 December 2012 19:54 (twelve years ago)

krugman is prob my favorite columnist, but he is completely useless as far as political strategy goes, its almost like he doesnt want to understand

lag∞n, Monday, 31 December 2012 20:03 (twelve years ago)

yeah I feel like he's playing a part when he does that, also his wife adds the extra touches

iatee, Monday, 31 December 2012 20:06 (twelve years ago)

One tic of his I dislike: the rhetorical questions.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 31 December 2012 20:17 (twelve years ago)

http://cinepad.com/images/thelma.jpg

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 21:31 (twelve years ago)

although probably more like

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQI96BeqsewPVMm4woBoywNXYKIAhzJLkwbwRxTJ_Uu1ncyC94vWlKmoUvd

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 21:35 (twelve years ago)

a smooth fiscal criminal?

Nhex, Monday, 31 December 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

OVER THE CLIFF WE GOOOO

Raymond Cummings, Monday, 31 December 2012 22:31 (twelve years ago)

That's a guy falling off a curb. xpost But yes.

Gukbe, Monday, 31 December 2012 22:39 (twelve years ago)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UndIxfNAqSs/Rvw6Fa6lX-I/AAAAAAAAAUs/bKYwzU329m4/s400/cliff2.bmp

pplains, Monday, 31 December 2012 22:44 (twelve years ago)

despite all my rage
there's still Tarantino on my page

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 31 December 2012 22:45 (twelve years ago)

and there was much rejoicing grudging toleration Morbsian wordplay

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:46 (twelve years ago)

It's about fucking time.

Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:46 (twelve years ago)

rip rich people

Clay, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:47 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/S89YX.jpg

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:50 (twelve years ago)

“No deal is the worse deal,” said Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, rejecting the assertions of liberal colleagues that no deal would be better than what they would see as a bad deal.

he couldn't just shut the fuck up and leave, right?!?

totaler Quatsch (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:52 (twelve years ago)

cool mandate

buzza, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 02:55 (twelve years ago)

fuuuuuuuuck lieberman

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 03:24 (twelve years ago)

might be the last time i get to post that :'(

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 03:25 (twelve years ago)

i know iatee deej et al revere lieberman's leadership especially in that purple old state CT but srsly burn in hell asshole

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 03:26 (twelve years ago)

Unemployment apparently extended in this possible deal.

― Gukbe, Monday, December 31, 2012 3:05 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah any deal dems cut is gonna extend unemployment obv

― fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Monday, December 31, 2012 3:08 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

sunrise also included

― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Monday, December 31, 2012 3:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html (schlump), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 05:39 (twelve years ago)

trying too hard kev

iatee, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 05:42 (twelve years ago)

also, Happy New Year, guy who called me an asshole! Death to apartheid.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 15:16 (twelve years ago)

emerging consensus seems to be eh dece deal nbd but whats gonna happen w the debt limit http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/01/perspective-on-the-deal

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 16:46 (twelve years ago)

not increasing the estate tax is imho unfortunate, not sure what happened to the payroll tax holiday

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)

If Obama stands his ground in that confrontation, this deal won’t look bad in retrospect. If he doesn’t, yesterday will be seen as the day he began throwing away his presidency and the hopes of everyone who supported him.

sounds familiar

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 16:49 (twelve years ago)

he said hes not gonna negotiate on it, which is kinda an admission that he didnt handle it v well last time around, luckily he was bailed out by loco republicans refusing to accept his gift, will be interesting to see what happens this time around

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 16:52 (twelve years ago)

guess the estate tax was raised somewhat

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 16:56 (twelve years ago)

here's everything I need to know:

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:01 (twelve years ago)

let your expansive loathing guide you my child

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:06 (twelve years ago)

i can only assume Morbs must think s. carolina, mississippi, alabama, georgia, tennessee, louisiana, texas, kansas, nebraska, utah, arizona etc and the very active voters living there just don't exist

Still S.M.D.H. ft. (will), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:11 (twelve years ago)

he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it
he said hes not gonna negotiate on it

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:11 (twelve years ago)

plz tell me youre laughing when u type those words

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:14 (twelve years ago)

guess the estate tax was raised somewhat

yglesias mentioned this on twitter but it's a strangely unpopular tax even tho it's the best one. you wonder if its just cause the left hasn't made the case very well or cause people just are weird and emotional about inheritances

iatee, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:14 (twelve years ago)

prob some of both, w a touch of joe the plumberism throw in

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:16 (twelve years ago)

won't somebody think of the billion dollar family farms

iatee, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 17:17 (twelve years ago)

maybe it's because everyone's inheritances are guns

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 20:01 (twelve years ago)

_guess the estate tax was raised somewhat_

yglesias mentioned this on twitter but it's a strangely unpopular tax even tho it's the best one. you wonder if its just cause the left hasn't made the case very well or cause people just are weird and emotional about inheritances

the latter duh

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 20:06 (twelve years ago)

time to start a 2013 thread?

Mordy, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 20:07 (twelve years ago)

Fiscal deal leaves central question of Obama presidency unresolved.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 20:13 (twelve years ago)

this is about to get ugly

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 21:19 (twelve years ago)

@brithume
Appears the House GOP's pie-in-the-sky caucus will blow up the deal, leaving new higher tax rates in place and assuring Rs get all blame.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 21:20 (twelve years ago)

lol

lag∞n, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 21:27 (twelve years ago)

sounds good to me tbh

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 21:27 (twelve years ago)

enter the Cantor

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 21:38 (twelve years ago)

Appears the House GOP's pie-in-the-sky caucus will blow up the deal John Boehner

fixed

Aimless, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 22:08 (twelve years ago)

I wouldn't be at all surprised if the White House secretly was banking on the deal blowing up in the House.

Moodles, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 22:12 (twelve years ago)

Obama doesn't play n-dimensional chess, man. He just doesn't.

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Tuesday, 1 January 2013 22:19 (twelve years ago)

He plays n-dimensional HORSE.

O: [makes 4-ft layup] OK, match that.
Senate: [makes 4-ft layup]
House: [has spastic fit, shoots basketball with Bushmaster, pisses self, vomits in gym bag, divorces wife, gets DUI on the way home]

WilliamC, Tuesday, 1 January 2013 23:32 (twelve years ago)

They needed a one-year patch but the deal is a permanent lowering of taxes. Fuck it. Risk another recession and be stronger in the future.

abanana, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 00:48 (twelve years ago)

the problem with trading short term legislative gains for long term ones is congress can alter legislation at any time, particularly in the case of taxes this happens a lot, not to mention that inviting recession is pretty callous

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 00:53 (twelve years ago)

congress can alter legislation at any time

asshole talking heads have elided this point (Howard Dean excepted) for the sake of suspense and Fiscal Cliff Drama.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 01:01 (twelve years ago)

The House is voting on this right now, if anybody has the stomach to switch to CSPAN. Alternate audio recommended over the call-in show yahoos, though.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:23 (twelve years ago)

Oh wait, it's some sort of procedural vote now, with the actual vote on the bill to come later.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:24 (twelve years ago)

Or maybe not. I can't tell. The CSPAN host said some other vote is coming up at 11 eastern.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:26 (twelve years ago)

I'm kinda sad that the House GOP appears to have decided not to implode over this

Moodles, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:32 (twelve years ago)

they want to so bad

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:33 (twelve years ago)

do we want them to?

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:34 (twelve years ago)

going by drudge's front page this is a huge defeat for the right wing

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:37 (twelve years ago)

idk, a lot of people are saying that if they just let the tax rates reset to clinton era levels then the dems can introduce a new bill thatll restore the bush tax cuts to the middle class, but then others are saying whats to stop the republican house from passing their own bill that cuts tax to earners up to 600k, plus all the other stuff like unemployment and capital gains and w/e

xp

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/TPNKA.png

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)

lol

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)

one thing that makes me skeptical of the dems always cave progressive storyline is that conservatives think the exact same thing abt republicans

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:42 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/GKAPA.png

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:44 (twelve years ago)

hollywood deserves all the breaks it can get. it's the only effective piece of our foreign affairs machine.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:45 (twelve years ago)

idk Hil had a good run

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:47 (twelve years ago)

Millions for Rum Producers!

http://captainsofcomedy.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/johnnydepp22.jpg

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:48 (twelve years ago)

ugh, i always forget that drudge exists and then when i check it out my head explodes.

right now they're featuring this article that talks about how the deal adds 4 trillion dollars to the deficit:

http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/economy/275095-cbo-fiscal-cliff-deal-carries-4-trillion-price-tag

which is true...as compared to the new longterm fiscal outlook of this morning, when the bush era vomit was allowed to expire for almost a full day. so misleading.

"reading specialist" (Z S), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 02:50 (twelve years ago)

Joseph Weisenthal @TheStalwart
GOP House aide predicting passage of Senate bill: "Members seem tired and ready to go home."

sweepy house

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 03:03 (twelve years ago)

:(

Clay, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 03:06 (twelve years ago)

The Senate-passed fiscal cliff bill that House Republicans now are debating is a “complete rout for Democrats” and ‘“complete surrender” for the GOP, conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer said Tuesday.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 03:13 (twelve years ago)

Didn't Krauthammer notice that Romney lost and the dems gained seats?

Aimless, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 03:35 (twelve years ago)

it passed

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 03:58 (twelve years ago)

They can put Biden back in the cellar for another six weeks now.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:02 (twelve years ago)

paul ryan voted yes, lol

fiscal cliff paul (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:03 (twelve years ago)

cantor voted no, troubles a brewin

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:10 (twelve years ago)

hooray, maybe we can raise the capital gains tax next

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:32 (twelve years ago)

I thought capital gains goes up to 20% in this deal?

Clay, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:54 (twelve years ago)

wait does it?

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:57 (twelve years ago)

oh shit you're right, hossanah

autistic boy is surprisingly good at basketball (silby), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:58 (twelve years ago)

So is this shit over

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:59 (twelve years ago)

I know, I know

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:59 (twelve years ago)

Republicans sulking, left without voting on $60 billion in hurricane relief.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:01 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, I just watched that play out. Boehner is such a fucking asshole.

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:04 (twelve years ago)

Or maybe...

Ryan Lizza ‏@RyanLizza
!!!!! @jbendery: Boehner aide refers questions about Sandy aid bill to Cantor's office.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:05 (twelve years ago)

Well now!

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:06 (twelve years ago)

shiiit!

it burns when 1p3 (goole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:09 (twelve years ago)

haha that's great

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:10 (twelve years ago)

Much to be written on this vote tonight. But for starters, Majority Leader Cantor and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy voted no. That’s just stunning. It is almost as though Cantor is plotting or hatching or just purchasing his coup on layaway.

An amazing moment

Josh Marshall

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:11 (twelve years ago)

Charles Pierce:

The moment came yesterday afternoon, when Eric Cantor, John Boehner's personal Cassius, came out against the deal that the Senate had sent to the House -- something, it should be recalled, that Boehner insisted the Senate do when he decided that the House, under his barely distinguishable leadership, would abandon its constitutional budgetary obligations. This entirely predictable development set folks agog, both on Capitol Hill, and within the courtier press. That's because the essential character of the Republican caucus in Boehner's House never had been fully explained to the American people. There was the squid-ink of "false equivalence" and intellectual cowardice clouding everything. It is impolitic -- and severely damaging to one's social schedule -- to point out that one half of the national legislature is controlled by a political party afflicted by self-inflicted dementia. In this context, "compromise" becomes less a goal than it does an anesthetic, lest the rest of us wake up and realize what has become of our self-governing republic. Watch, though, if the feral children send this back to the Senate with poison-pill "amendments," at least one prominently "objective" reporter will find "room for compromise" in one or more of those amendments. (Luke Russert? White courtesy phone, please.) Then, as Ms. Parker would have put it, I will fwow up.

The president and the Democrats have given all they can be expected to give, and more. The president has proven himself willing to make a lie of the central economic promise that got him re-elected. The vice-president spent two days pretending Mitch McConnell was a national leader. They all had to know this was futile. (McConnell, especially, had to know it, since the same bats flying around the House belfry are flying around Kentucky right now, threatening to primary his withered hindquarters.) Did they really think that Boehner, who couldn't muster a majority to pass his own stunt-bill a week ago, would risk his speakership by forcing a vote he could only win by enlisting more Democrats than he'd spoken to in two years? Were there mushrooms in the egg nog this year?

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:17 (twelve years ago)

i just checked the list of votes and every representative from PA, R or D, voted aye.

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:19 (twelve years ago)

Michelle Malkin ‏@michellemalkin

Paul Ryan says the 41-to-1 tax hikes to spending cuts crapwich "reflects conservative values." Stop it.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:29 (twelve years ago)

ryan's vote prob needs to be put in context of how he wants to come across in 2016

iatee, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:32 (twelve years ago)

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.mandatory.com/media/2012/10/romney-son-soon-6.jpg

Clay, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 05:38 (twelve years ago)

No way am I bookmarking THAT.

karl lagerlout (suzy), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 08:02 (twelve years ago)

It's already bookmarked you.

nickn, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 08:08 (twelve years ago)

mitt's actually kind of a handsome guy, what the shit happened to Tagg?

I had such a fontasy (stevie), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 08:55 (twelve years ago)

THe ones who take after Mommy all have that look.

karl lagerlout (suzy), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 09:04 (twelve years ago)

So is this shit over

For a sportsfan, Raymond, u sure miss some of the basics.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 12:31 (twelve years ago)

so the only Dem senator who voted against this 'from the left' was Harkin.

Harkin 2016

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 12:41 (twelve years ago)

House Speaker John Boehner couldn’t hold back when he spotted Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in the White House lobby last Friday.

It was only a few days before the nation would go over the fiscal cliff, no bipartisan agreement was in sight, and Reid had just publicly accused Boehner of running a “dictatorship” in the House and caring more about holding onto his gavel than striking a deal.
Continue Reading
Text Size

“Go f— yourself,” Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present.

Reid, a bit startled, replied: “What are you talking about?”

Boehner repeated: “Go f— yourself.”

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 13:23 (twelve years ago)

lollllll Boehner goin off the rails. 2013 is gonna rule so hard

too many encores (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 13:49 (twelve years ago)

But Obama warned again that he would not negotiate with Republicans over the $16.4 trillion debt limit, which must be raised in the coming weeks. “While I will negotiate over many things,” he said, “I will not have another debate with this Congress over whether they will pay the bills they’ve already racked up.”

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:26 (twelve years ago)

reid is a pretty good troll

iatee, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:27 (twelve years ago)

Nice photo.

http://i1059.photobucket.com/albums/t427/sayhey1/cliff_zpsc9e9b90a.jpg

Don't know which I'd rather see: the word bubble on the right, or the three thought bubbles on the left.

clemenza, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:28 (twelve years ago)

"how does my dick taste in your mouth?"

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:31 (twelve years ago)

bohner: "i don't know, pretty good i guess"

Spectrum, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)

“Go f— yourself,” Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present.

Reid, a bit startled, replied: “What are you talking about?”

Boehner repeated: “Go f— yourself.”

This kinda confirms my theory that Boehner is either perpetually hung over or at least two beers into the day.

this will surprise many (Nicole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)

you hear these stories about how some medieval kings would pray for literally two or three hours every day, in solitude, that's how i imagine boehner, always on his knees, silently asking god to forgive american liberals for being meddling godless ninnies etc, standing up, fortified, ready to do battle again

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 15:09 (twelve years ago)

I dunno, I think I'm with Nicole's theory; see Boehner drinking 2-3 hours a day, not praying.

Rocking Disco Santa (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 15:10 (twelve years ago)

yeah tracer that seems way off to me

so, the payroll tax holiday is over. fuck.

it burns when 1p3 (goole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:06 (twelve years ago)

I'd tell Harry Reid to go fuck himself too.

2013 is gonna rule so hard

Counterpoint:

http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/

(excellent note on which to start 2013 thread. Plz leave Robot POTUS's name out of title.)

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:15 (twelve years ago)

We should close this thread, yes.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:17 (twelve years ago)

A new year. Symmetry requires it.

the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:17 (twelve years ago)

American Politics 2013: Let's Talk About Hillary Clinton

iatee, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:18 (twelve years ago)

“Go f— yourself,” Boehner sniped as he pointed his finger at Reid, according to multiple sources present.

Reid, a bit startled, replied: “What are you talking about?”

Boehner repeated: “Go f— yourself.”

― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, January 2, 2013 8:23 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

haha

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:19 (twelve years ago)

“What are you talking about?”

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:19 (twelve years ago)

I imagine Boehner preening in the mirror and seeing a much younger, more virile crooner in his imagination, a figment that can only persist as long as he's on at least his third highball of the morning.

check the name, no caps, boom, i'm (Laurel), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:19 (twelve years ago)

American Politics 2013: What are you talking about?

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:19 (twelve years ago)

American Politics 2013: Go Fuck Yourself

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:20 (twelve years ago)

What are you talking about?

lag∞n, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:21 (twelve years ago)

yessssssssss xp

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:21 (twelve years ago)

wait -- no dirty thread titles at work, goddammit

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)

Boehner has turned into Dick Cheney, i see (at least as far as having a potty mouth).

롤이 엿 번역 시간을 낭비 (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)

American Politics Thread 2013: Bangs, Whimpers and Filibusters

ILX is not a non-profit — we are just not profitable (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)

American Politics Q1 2013: Speaker of the House Al Swearingen

it burns when 1p3 (goole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:23 (twelve years ago)

the same bats flying around the House belfry are flying around Kentucky right now, threatening to primary his withered hindquarters

this sentence is a thing of beauty fyi

xxxxp

If I was a carpenter, and you were a douchebag (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:25 (twelve years ago)

oh fuck, I would so prefer Swearingen as president to the last five or six.

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:27 (twelve years ago)

Would have supported "Politics 2013: Now On Bloodthinners"

WilliamC, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:28 (twelve years ago)

yeah that's good

it burns when 1p3 (goole), Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:28 (twelve years ago)

American Politics 2013: It's Not a Cave, Its What they Believe

Biggest O and Dem cave so far: keeping first $5 m exempt from estate tax.--tweet from Robert Reich, who was Clinton's Secretary of Labor

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 16:31 (twelve years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.