book club

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Is anybody in one of those book clubs, where you read a book, then discuss it? How does it work, and what level of books do you read? (Jurassic Park, Finnagen's Wake)

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)

no i am not in a book club but i would like to be.
perhaps we could start one??
my 'level' of books varies.
i can enjoy something like 'the holographic universe' ( non-fiction ) or a classic like 'anna karenina', or 'the magi', or 'fear and loathing in las vegas' to name some well-known but not recent ones.
i am trying to convince my local library to get in some of the books suggested by people here ( my local sucks unfortunately ).

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Get it right: Finnegans Wake

Lek Dukagjin, Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:21 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, it would be grand if we could get something like this organized.

i'll be reading ellison's "invisible man" for class this semester, maybe we could organise around that...

mike (ro)bott, Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)

we could do a close reading, with two or more outside sources and strict MLA citation, even.

boxcubed (boxcubed), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:42 (twenty-three years ago)

yay yay yay yay book club!!! lets start one!!

a chapter a week, and no reading ahead!!

who's interested?

gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 02:09 (twenty-three years ago)

we could read Umberto Eco's new book (does anyone like him?) and go on a lot fun detours into general medieval history an' stuff.

tho it mught be better to start with something shorter...

i haven't r3ad invisible man...

non-fiction maybe?

gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 02:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I would LOVE LOVE LOVE a book club!

And I think Umberto Eco's new book and Invisible Man are both good suggestions...

It seems that fiction is easier to discuss than non-fiction...there's more room for interpretation.

nory (nory), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)

a new eco novel ?

i need to know more.

mike (ro)bott, Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:20 (twenty-three years ago)

yep ok im in.
and can we do more than one chapter a week? or i will go mad

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:21 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not sure if the new Eco is out here in the U.S. yet, but I know it's coming soon, sometime this month, I believe. It's set during the last Crusade, in Constantinople. I forget the title, though.

nory (nory), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I am interested. I have little preference regarding what we read.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)

kurt vonnegut, one chapter a week! haha

i would like to try to do this, if i can't keep up with y'all i'll just try again on the next one (i don't read much, unfortunately, but maybe this will help me keep at it)

ron (ron), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:56 (twenty-three years ago)

what IS the title of umbertos new book?
gabe?

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes a book club!! But make it three chapters a week, because I read really fast and I'll go insane.

Elisabeth (Elisabeth), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:04 (twenty-three years ago)

hehe lets do Das Kapital one volume a week ;-)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:19 (twenty-three years ago)

how have i managed to read so slowly and not go insane? oh wait...

ron (ron), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:40 (twenty-three years ago)

a blurb about Baudolino(from the publisher, mind you):

"It is April 1204, and Constantinople, the splendid capital of the Byzantine Empire, is being sacked and burned by the knights of the Fourth Crusade. Amid the carnage and confusion, one Baudolino saves a historian and high court official from certain death at the hands of the crusading warriors and proceeds to tell his own fantastical story.

Born a simple peasant in northern Italy, Baudolino has two major gifts--a talent for learning languages and a skill in telling lies. When still a boy he meets a foreign commander in the woods, charming him with his quick wit and lively mind. The commander--who proves to be Emperor Frederick Barbarossa--adopts Baudolino and sends him to the university in Paris, where he makes a number of fearless, adventurous friends.

Spurred on by myths and their own reveries, this merry band sets out in search of Prester John, a legendary priest-king said to rule over a vast kingdom in the East--a phantasmagorical land of strange creatures with eyes on their shoulders and mouths on their stomachs, of eunuchs, unicorns, and lovely maidens.

As always with Eco, this abundant novel includes dazzling digressions, outrageous tricks, extraordinary feeling, and vicarious reflections on our postmodern age. This is Eco the storyteller at his brilliant best."

the english translation will be available for shoplifting on Oct. 15


gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)

ok, well im prepared to read this one and see.
but im in NZ so will find out when it is released here ok.
any other suggestions while we are at it?

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 05:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I am in one online literary group that does chapter-a-week readings. I don't think they work terribly well - people get bored, and there are always people who read ahead (or happen to have read the book before) who unbalance the discussion.

I was in a real-world reading club about ten years ago, for a while. It was generally middlebrow literary stuff - most Booker nominees would have been ideal. The mechanism, which I mention as a possible one to use here, is that we would agree a term's list in advance (it was run in a local college so took those breaks), and we would know what book we were going to discuss each week at least a month before. Someone would sort of lead/introduce each book, we would all be given a chance for our say, and general open discussion was pretty limited. Since there is no time/space limit here, that stuff is irrelevant, and anyone can put in their comments anytime. However, I would not be interested if it's a chapter-a-week basis. I'd rather say that we will open discussion of Book A (nominations and voting for a list, maybe) on, say, November 1st; talk about book B will begin on Nov 8th (or after whatever agreed interval); and so on.

A list means that those without time for a book a week can pick and choose, setting the dates way in advance gives us time to find and read the book at our own pace, and we aren't imposing an intolerably slow rate for others - if you're fast and have time you can leave it until October 30th to start reading! We could make nominations for books we'd be interested in doing - maybe put all those that get two nominations to a vote to compose the advance list.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 11:39 (twenty-three years ago)

yes a list sounds good, and it also gives time to find/buy/afford ( in my case ) the book.

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

If other people fancy that kind of structure, I'm happy to collate votes and stuff like that. I'll make some nominations myself later, when I've had a think. What sort of intervals would suit? One week, two? How many people are interested at all?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Tried to participate in an on-line one recently -- it was on a book a month basis, which strikes me as feasible all around and wasn't overly complicated to work out -- but I ended up being about the only person talking much. I'd potentially be interested, but at the same time I think it would take away time I really need to get two novels that are hanging fire done (I'm beginning to switch back to a generally hardcore nonfiction reading bent with the occasional dab in fiction, too...I'd almost want to suggest an alternating scheme of fiction then nonfiction book per book).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 October 2002 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

i agree with nory that there can be more room for personal interpretations with fiction, but i do generally go for non-fiction so either suits me fine.
i am just getting excited about this hahahaha.
LETS READ AND DISCUSS. yay.
a book a week may be a bit much, whether due to time constraints or whatever.
one a month i can do, it sets a better frame than saying 'x' number of chapters per week, and as you say we can all read at our own pace that way.
i will also try to come up with some suggestions but my literary focus is so um.......unfocussed now, after my stint in the desert, so please be polite if i come out with shyte. :-)

donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Monthly looks popular. As for fiction/non-fiction, my suspicion is that we will generally get more enthusiasm for the right fiction than any non-fiction, but I don't see any reason to exclude non-fiction. Hey, The Pinefox, when does your first book come out? (Only joking: I think a book by a pal and fellow ILXer needs different treatment.)

I'll post some things I fancy reading tomorrow, see if any are of wider interest.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.moominshop.com/cardecalhatti.gif

hint hint (mark s), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know what that's from, Mark, though it's very cute. Are you making a nomination?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i like Martin's idea a lot.

I ought to leave the question of discussion frequency up to the employed swine among us, as I actually have nothing to do BUT read lately, but the potential for chaos in a weekly setup appeals to me--the result would be a nicely decentralized discussion system. I imagine that there would be concurrent discussions on several different books- which i find more in the spirit of ile than a monolithic READ THESE PAGES BY FRIDAY sorta system.

and i second Ned's alternating fiction with non-fiction idea.
i have been feasting on the bloated corpse of fiction for too long, and have grown fat and listless.

gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Various books I'm about to read, that could or could not have potential in a list:

Fiction:
Faulkner - Sound and The Fury
Thomas Pynchon - Crying of Lot 49
Proust - Swann's Way
Italo Calvino- If on a winter's night a traveler
Joyce - Dubliners
Nabokov - Pale Fire
Dostoevsky - Notes From Underground
Tolstoy - Death of Ivan Ilych
Solzhenitsyn - Matryona's House
a bunch from the 20th century Russian Reader edited by Clarence Brown

Non-Fiction:
Stephen Hawkins - A Brief History of Time
Brian Greene - The Elegant Universe
G.K. Chesterton - Orthodoxy
George Smoot - Wrinkles in Time

but I'm open to pretty much anything not very bad

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey A, I've read the first seven you list. I guess I might be up for the Faulkner, Joyce or Calvino again. I wouldn't want to read Swann's Way without continuing through the whole thing again, which is unlikely to get dozens of others joining in (what is it, 5,000 pages?).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

this sounds great, if i could keep up with the reading (i have a lot of schoolwork and i can't go very fast on for-fun reading because of it). i'm so interested to hear what people here have to say about books because you are all so perceptive and thoughtful, although i probably wouldn't have much discussion to contribute.

Maria (Maria), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Some nominations from the books I have lined up to read, picking those I think might be suitable or interesting to ILE people, starting with fiction:
Steve Erickson - Tours Of The Black Clock
Heinrich Boll - The Safety Net
Anthony Burgess - Nothing Like The Sun
Peter Carey - Jack Maggs
Don DeLillo - Underworld
Ford Madox Ford - Parade's End
Gabriel Garcia Marquez - Strange Pilgrims
Philip Hensher - Pleasured
Alan Judd - The Devil's Own Work
George Konrad - The Loser
John Lanchester - The Debt To Pleasure
Torgny Lindgren - In Praise Of Truth
Cormac McCarthy - Blood Meridian
Larry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & Ned
Amos Oz - Don't Call It Night
Richard Powers - Galatea 2.2
Philip Roth - Deception
Jeff Torrington - The Devil's Carousel

and a shorter list of non-fiction:
Gilbert Adair - Surfing The Zeitgeist (criticism)
Will Self - Sore Sites (on architecture - remaindered in the UK)
Keith Waterhouse - English Our English (on good writing)
Jon Savage - England's Dreaming (on punk)
Ronin Ro - Have Gun Will Travel (on Death Row Records)

More nominations? Votes on those already suggested (not just by me, obviously - Baudolino by Umberto Eco should also be counted, I think)? Who is interested at all?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 14:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm interested in theory, and like the look of a whole bunch of stuff mentioned already..

(since this is something which would need a whole crop of threads, wouldn't it require its own board?)

thom west (thom w), Sunday, 6 October 2002 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I don't think so. One thread announces the books to be discussed, one each for the books read (that's one a month), I can't see a need for many more. Given how many new threads start every month, this will hardly overbalance ILE!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)

i'd be interested. you could start a board for it

ron (ron), Sunday, 6 October 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Nice one Nairn - I absolutely love PALE FIRE by Nabokov!

Lek Dukagjin, Sunday, 6 October 2002 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)

am happy to go with your recommendations martin as you seem to be clued-up enough for my tastes, but i want to know if anyone else likes norman mailers work, which i do, and there are a few of his i am yet to read.?

donna (donna), Sunday, 6 October 2002 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)

just looked at my list of wanna reads and i would pick 'harlots ghost' of mailers.
anyone else?

donna (donna), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Another reason to resist a new board: I would rather attract ILE people interested in this kind of activity than random googlers.

How about if we start voting for what to read? Not to close off nominations, but how about we name five books, either already mentioned or new, that we want to do. The ones that get most support can be the first couple we do, and then we can reassess continuing, schedules and selection processes after that. By the way, do tell me to bugger off if you don't like my taking charge if this - I really don't want to seem as if I'm imposing anything on anyone.

My five, all from my own list, unsurprisingly:
Steve Erickson - Tours Of The Black Clock
Richard Powers - Galatea 2.2
George Konrad - The Loser
Larry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & Ned
Will Self - Sore Sites (on architecture - remaindered in the UK, but may not be available in the US - anyone know? If it isn't available, I'll have Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian as my reserve choice!)

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Larry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & Ned

Well, the title alone, after all. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)

What about
Bret Easton Ellis - American Psycho
or Rules of Attraction?

A Nairn (moretap), Sunday, 6 October 2002 22:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the Nothing Like the Sun suggestion. I've been wanting to read that.

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 6 October 2002 22:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Martin, thank you so much for taking charge of this.

Here are my nominations (chosen because they're on my list, anyway, and they seem like books people here could be interested in and entertained by):

Empire Falls by Richard Russo
The Eyre Affair by Jasper Fforde
Number9Dream by David Mitchell
Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem
and I'll second Blood Meridian, since I've never read any Cormac McCarthy

It's quite possible some of these books aren't available yet outside the U.S. (oh, and Martin, it looks like Sore Sites would be tough to get here), so I'll have Rules of Attraction (as I haven't read any Bret Easton Ellis, either), as my alternate.

nory (nory), Monday, 7 October 2002 02:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd really like to be in a book club - but I am limited by being in a small town with one library and a couple of not terribly-good-bookshops. But I am going to the library tonight and I'll have a look for some of the titles suggested. Maybe I could just join in as and when a book comes up that I can find?

isadora, Monday, 7 October 2002 03:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Glamorama!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 7 October 2002 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)

yes i would like to read glamorama

ron (ron), Monday, 7 October 2002 03:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Glamorama is really good, but in typical Bret Easton Ellis style kind of confusing. I like Less than Zero best, though.

Livvie, Monday, 7 October 2002 06:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I was in a monthly book club in LA with a bunch of my female friends from high school. We did it in response to the weekly "boy's night" our male high school friends had. We'd make food, talk about the book and catch up on our news.

We read some classic book club books and some not so classic:

Diary of a Geisha by Arthur Elgar
The White Bone
'Tis by Frank McCourt
Bridget Jones' Diary (summer book club on the beach selection)
White Teeth by Zadie Smith
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (! -- X-mas holiday homework selection)
The Girls' Guide to Hunting and Fishing
Seabiscuit: An American Legend
Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Letham
Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer
A script written by one of our members
and a bunch of others I don't recall.

We took turns hosting and whoever was hosting chose the book. It was all very casual -- reading the book was optional, even for the hostess, but again, this was more of a social thing than most book clubs.

I'm terrible about reading the books in time, but it seems to me that it might be fun for you to conduct at least part of the ILE book club as a live internet chat at an agreed time or times, and you could always post the transcript for people to continue responding to later.

felicity (felicity), Monday, 7 October 2002 07:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I think this sounds nice and I like Martin's book a month suggestion. IN my five (all fiction) I'd second:

Jonathan Lethem / Motherless Brooklyn (and)
Ellison / The Invisible Man

and suggest:

A L Kennedy / So I am Glad (hello david howie).
Doris Lessing / Martha Quest
(and)
Alan Warner / Morvern Callar (because there's so my hype around the film and it puts me off a bit but I'd quite like to force myself to read it).

But I don't care if you ignore these. I'd rather have the incentive to read something I probably otherwise wouldn't.

Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I started a book club with my friends as a joke a few years ago and it was quite a success for a while. After a couple of years it kind of petered out.

Curiously, Morvern Callar was one of the first books we did and also received one of the worst overall ratings (yes, we marked books out of 100 in a kind of only semi-joking way). I remember one of my female friends objections was that it was clearly written by a man as the idea of warming one's knickers on the kettle was v.unrealistic.

Books that got the highest approval:

THE WIND UP BIRD CHRONICLE by Haruki Murakami
A Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole
Birthday Letters by Ted Hughes


Books that got the highest disapproval:
Morvern Callar by Alan Warner
The Woman in Black by Susan Hill
Girlfriend in a Coma by Douglas Coupland
Hotel World by Ali Smith (though by this stage there were only about three of us in attendance)

Books that divided us most:
The Black Prince by Iris Murdoch
The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy
Night by Elie Weisel
The Inimitable Jeeves by PG Wodehouse
The Third Policeman by Flann O'Brien

Honorary mention for 'interesting discussion':
Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov

Now that I've left London they are planning on starting it up again. With Roy Keane's autobiography.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've been meaning to read some Steve Erickson since Sterling and Edna recommended them on a thread about a year ago. So I vote for that one.

Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)

them=him

Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)

Pleeeeaaaaaase not Pale Fire or the Third Policeman. I've tried both three times and can't bear the inevitable shame of being defeated again. (I got halfway through A Confed of Dunces so wouldn't mind another crack at that).

Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Why would anyone want to warm their knickers anyway? There are clearly whole *levels* of unrealistic here.

Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I am surprised that The Third Policeman stumped you, Ellie. It's not 'difficult' at all (I know that sounds v.wanky but you kwow what I mean - I've had my fair share of being defeated by books). Anyway, I'd rather read a new book, so don't worry.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:19 (twenty-three years ago)

The belated Morvern Callar backlash starts here. He collaborated with Superstar!

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Lots with two votes so far, but not much emerging - though two Brett Easton Ellis's are in there, so I guess if nothing starts pushing significantly ahead we could pick one of those (I've read 'em all already, but would be willing to go again). But lets give it a couple more days yet, see who else wants to vote. Okay?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 18:43 (twenty-three years ago)

ok...
fiction I have yet to read that I would like to read:
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
War and Peace
The Idiot or Crime and Punishment or Brothers Karamazov
Magic Mountain
(the new houllebecq)
In general, I am a canon whore when it comes to literature, so if it is published by penguin classics, or vintage, then I will assent to reading it.

nonfiction:
I dunno. Primary source social theory type shit. Or perhaps something about the Beatles *ducks*

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 7 October 2002 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)

try like this: have one person nominate a book and we can go with that.

who wants to go first?

500 posts by tomorrow morning otherwise I'll wear a burka.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

If I joined this, I would make you all read pulpy fantasy novels, like _Eye Of The World_ by Robert Jordan or _A Game Of Thrones_ by George R. R. Martin.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a little late to this thread too, but I want in.
Some books I want to read:

"Don Quixote" by Cervantes
"Ada, or Ardor" by Nabakov
Anything by Murakami
The new Umberto Eco
and since I've been on a Nabakov kick lately, any of the classic Russian authors would be great to get an idea of his influences.

However, I will go along with just about anything. I haven't seen the Self book on architecture here in the US, though I typically look in the fiction section, so that might be why.

Nick A., Monday, 7 October 2002 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)

id like to be in on this, and ill read anything, provided its been published here in the states and i can find it without too much trouble.

amy (amy), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I hate to make things even more confusing, since I've already posted my nominations, but I'd like to 2nd the A.L. Kennedy and the new Eco.

(I don't quite understand how in the world one book will ever be chosen)

nory (nory), Monday, 7 October 2002 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)

If we end up with a few that's best - that gives us a couple of months' worth. The Eco is doing very well, and seems a pretty perfect choice (virtually no one will have read it before, and there's bound to be loads to dissect, and I expect most of us would be up for it), but since it isn't out yet I hope we can find one or two before that, to give the Eco a chance to get more widely available in libraries.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Is it too late to still sign up? And can I nominate one more title? Finnegans Wake, starting at around page 332.

But seriously, I'm up for any Pynchon; it'd be fantastic to revisit Invisible Man and some of the "easier" Nabokov. And Virginia Woolf and Michael Ondaatje. And I keep meaning to check into Dostoevsky.

No to Blood Merde!ian and to Delillo.

Leee, Monday, 7 October 2002 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I've got Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man sitting on my desk, unread, but i think a lot of people have already read that.

A Nairn (moretap), Monday, 7 October 2002 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)

It's never too late, Leee (were you in Imagination?). I can't see many of us coping with Finnegans Wake, though I did read Finnegan's Week (Joseph Wambaugh) not long ago due to a clerical error.

Nabokov and Dostoyevsky seem popular, though without a particular book emerging. Invisible Man is going strongly (can I confirm that we are all thinking Ralph Ellison? I presume so). I'm not sure there is a veto available, and I'm guessing that if this is a runner people will drop in and out depending on the books selected.

I've read loads of the books being nominated (including that), A, but that's not such a bad thing. I did think Portrait a bit dull - FW and U are too ambitious, I think (and we have a genuine Joyce expert in our midst, so there is a risk of imbalance), but Dubliners would get my support.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)

my vote has to be for "the invisible man", since i'll be engrossed in it for class. and as such i'll have plenty of articles and material to spread around.

mike (ro)bott, Monday, 7 October 2002 22:20 (twenty-three years ago)

the problem that I have with "Portrait..." is that there are a million notes in my edition, and I lose my way rather quickly flipping back and forth...
Dubliners is excellent, and I am always up for rereading it.
As for Dostoyevsky, I can't say anything that will help us choose, as I have only read his "Notes From the Underground" and some short story concerning a Christmas party.

Perhaps we should codify the "rules" of the club before picking the books. Are we set on reading one book per month? I would prefer to read one book every three weeks, but I am not going to press my case, especially since it is better to err on the side of too much time instead of not enough. If we choose to do one book per month, then we should conduct the surveys once every three or four months, and pick either three or four books each time. I know you have stated similar sentiments above, Martin, and, seeing as there is plenty of interest, we should decide on these matters soon. This will give some direction to this thread and the ones that follow. If we, for instance, decide to choose four books every four months, then it will be much easier to sort through this thread to reach some sort of consensus.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 7 October 2002 22:34 (twenty-three years ago)

i have just been to my locla bookstore and enquired about eco's new book. unfortunately although it can be ordered in for me the cost will be $70 nz which is way out of my budgetary reach.
if that is any indication i will only be able to join in if the books arent new releases and able to be located at the library, otherwise i will just have to be satisfied with being a lurker on the book club thread, getting vicarious joy from reading your comments.....:-(

donna (donna), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm in. My two cents would be for some Pynchon (which I've been meaning to read, and seems to sit on that nice middle ground of good enough for a book club yet not likely to be read in a class) or for the Eco.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I've just remembered that the worst vote of all was for 'Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood'.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 08:28 (twenty-three years ago)

'Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood'


Has anyone else read this? Is it as appalling as it looks?

RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:23 (twenty-three years ago)

It really is. And the women hated it too so that excuse won't wash.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Who's the Joyce expert? Yeah, I think Dubliners is a great idea. And Nabokov- has everyone else already read Lolita? I have a nice edition of it and would like a compelling excuse to actually READ it.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:36 (twenty-three years ago)

my brother is reading dubliners right now for his english A-level.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)

in non-fiction i nominate 'The Arcadia Project'.

i stole it from Barnes and Noble a few weeks ago, but i'm a little scared to read it alone.

gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Like I said, I've been on a Nabakov kick, so here are my suggestions as far as that goes.
I mainly suggested "Ada, or Ardor" because I haven't read it yet. I think we should stay away from Lolita, because most have probably already read it at least once, and there are movie versions for the cheaters. I would also recommend we stay away from The Gift, as I am trudging through it now and finding it very dull (though well-written), and enjoyment of it seems dependant on having a large knowledge of Russian literature.
So I would recommend:

Pnin - if we want something on the lighter side. It's pretty funny, a great store, and not as "difficult" as other Nabakov.

The Real Life of Sebastian Knight - a little harder to follow, but not particularly long, and would probably inspire some good discussion/arguments.

Pale Fire - again, would inspire good discussion, and I didn't really find it as hard to follow as some others seem to think it would be.

Those would be my top recommendations of the ones I've read.

A question about the rules of the book club: Would there be an assignment of a few chapters per week, or would be reading and discussing at our own pace?

Nick A., Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:23 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it would be much better to pick a recent book.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)

PS: There may indeed be a great store called Pnin, but I was referring to the great story.
Also, I would second Ondaatje.

Nick A., Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe anyone would read Divine Secrets -- ew ew ew!

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the chapter reading idea is a dumb one because of people reading ahead and going 'oo oo'. Just give everyone a month to read it and let that be the end of it.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)

there's a structural problem re pale fire, surely (eg by its very nature you don't get the most from it the first time through)

sorry to be oblique, but just in case spoilers are an issue

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Please let it not be Nabokov.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)

It seems that we might have a problem w/ contemporary books vs. classics. I vote for contemporary, myself, but I realize newer stuff can be more difficult for some people to get...

Maybe two threads a month? One for an established classic, and one for something more contemporary? That way, people could pick and choose, or do both.

nory (nory), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 12:40 (twenty-three years ago)

The one-classic/one-contemp idea sounds quite nice, if a little out or reach for me since I'm plodding through Funnyman's Awake at a rate of 5 pages every other day. (I know that if I start another book I'll abandon FW.)

On Ondaatje, I haven't read anything before "In The Skin of A Lion," which I'm way more than willing to reread for the third time. But aside from that, I nominate "Coming Through the Slaughter" which is "about" Buddy Bolden. "English Patient" suxors, so we shall keep at arm's distance.

And Pynchon may not be so feasible after all... either a 600+ page tome with incredibly dense writing in only a month, or a dense 150 page novel (still with dense writing) over one month, and IMO Lot 49 is a two week book.

And I am a Joyce/Ulysses expert-in-training.

Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 18:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I suggest "Hop On Pop".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 18:33 (twenty-three years ago)

It does have that great line about Red, Fred and Ned in bed, yes.

I can't believe anyone would read Divine Secrets -- ew ew ew!

But it's the concluding part of the epic fantasy trilogy for Lifetime network watchers. (The preceding two parts are of course Steel Magnolias and Fried Green Tomatoes; together, set in the mythic land known as the American South, they allow everyone a chance to escape from their humdrum lives -- as well as being the only fantasy works acceptable to mainstream critics that aren't written in Spanish).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 21:33 (twenty-three years ago)

someone's got a chip on their shoulder. genre fiction? hahaha

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I? ;-)

Jody Beth and I conferred and would like to suggest Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential for the nonfiction section of all this. All food-happy people should read it, I think!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 04:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Jody Beth and I conferred and would like to suggest Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential for the nonfiction section of all this. All food-happy people should read it, I think!

Yes, and leave it to the New York Times Book Review to compare Bourdain to Iggy Pop (that noted culinary authority). Hmmm.

Jody Beth Rosen, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 04:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Virginia Woolf-Mrs. Dalloway
Toni Morrison-Song of Solomon
D.H. Lawrence-Women in Love
Thomas Hardy-Tess D'urberville
Albert Camus-The Stranger
Gloria Naylor- The Women of Brewster PLace
Maybe a Mary Gaitskill writing
Non-fiction-
Kitchen Confidential-I'm with Jody Beth Rosen and Ned on this
Christina Stansell-American Moderns
bell hooks-Outlaw Culture

Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 06:18 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd be interested in an ILE reading group as I've never written any literary criticism in my life. At school I refused to take English Lit, essentially because I was an obnoxious teenage twat. I really regret the fact that I didn't.

If enough of the the ILE group were to settle on a Penguin book to read I could get copies at massive discount - We could settle up with Paypal.
(please, don't anybody ask for individual copies of anything - I just can't do it)

I'll put another vote in for Invisible Man, as I've never read it.
Also I'd recommend "Twelve Bar Blues" by Patrick Neate which won last years Whitbread Novel Award and would appeal to many here as it has a musical bent. Surprisingly I can't find mention of it on ILX.

Simeon (Simeon), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:49 (twenty-three years ago)

the first rule of book club etc etc etc

g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)

*ahem* sorry Ned, but Anthony Bourdain can BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS. the first few chapters of that book were OK, i even giggled when he called vegans a hezbollah-like splinter group, or something (i mean really) but to be honest i find his abrasive tone and know-it-all manner extrememly irritating, and him thinking he is PUNXOR = a JOKE.

katie (katie), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:42 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually, the reading should be something like the first 40 threads on ILM and the first 40 threads on ILE and then analyzing them in the social context of when they were written. Or is that too self-reflexive?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Sadly, there's no way of viewing old threads by date. Graham, can you fix this ha ha?

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)

BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS

Oh my.

Bourdain is definitely his own style of crabby bastard, I'll grant you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Bourdain is definitely his own style of crabby bastard, I'll grant you.

"What kind of glue-sniffing, crackhead mesomorphs you got working for you? You don't have an order for me? What?! I called the shit in myself... I spoke to a human! I didn't even leave it on the tape! And you're telling me you don't have my order? I got three fucking produce companies! THREE! AND IT'S ALWAYS YOU THAT FUCKS ME IN THE ASS!"

Jody Beth Rosen, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)

I think we try a monthly schedule and see how it goes. I'd rather take it easy at first, since doing two a month might cut the numbers badly. If we can get started well we can reconsider. I am thinking that I'll try to extract three or four favourites from the voting, which would be much easier if people had chosen five each.

I take the point about the price of a brand new book like the Eco, but surely if we give it a month or two it will be reasonably easily available in libraries? Invisible Man is going very strongly, so that might be the first choice. Let's set a deadline for votes - how about midnight on Friday? That's 48 and a quarter hours from now...

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Invisible Man sounds good -- I haven't read it in 12 years and this will give me a chance to read it again.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:54 (twenty-three years ago)

And I've never read it myself -- long overdue on my part! Good choice. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm happy with that.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 09:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Ok is that the final choice then? I want to read this too. Did Ellison's unfinished followup ever get published?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Can we do the HG Wells one instead please?

Sam (chirombo), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm up for a book club as long as it doesn't get too heavy and make me feel like I'm back at school! I read at an alarming rate (sometimes 2 or 3 books a week) but I plough my way through pulp fiction mostly. I use books as an escape, but sometimes I get sick of trashy novels and go back to classics. I'd love to do anything by Dostoyevsky, I've been waiting for a chance to discuss The Idiot with somebody who has actually read it for ages.
Has Invisible Man been decided on then?

Plinky (Plinky), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm in with whatever is decided.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Invisible Man works for me.

nory (nory), Thursday, 10 October 2002 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Shoot, I'll join in if it's _Invisible Man_. I read _Black Boy_ and _Native Son_ in high school and thought they were both brilliant.

Hey, has everyone/anyone read _Going After Cacciato_?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 10 October 2002 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Ok is that the final choice then? I want to read this too. Did Ellison's unfinished followup ever get published?

-- Andrew Thames

Yeah, Juneteenth came out last year to mixed reviews, some hailed at as genius others thought the way the executor had cut and pasted to come up with a final copy was v. obvious and that this should not even be considered an Ellison book. Haven't read it so can't tell you either way.

H (Heruy), Thursday, 10 October 2002 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)

So...
If anyone needs a copy of Invisible man, I can order them for:
£3.20 (US$5) Modern Classic edition with introduction and shiny silver cover or:
£2.40 (US$3.75) Penguin essential edition. Smaller, cheaper paper, no intro.

I'd rather order X number of one or the other - just because I'm easily confused. I think it would be better to all be reading the same edition as we can refer to page numbers if need be.

This is totally an non-profit offer by the way. I'll abuse the company post for mailing out (Hi Googling employer!)
I guess you could send me something interesting in the post if you didn't want to use paypal. Cool CDR's, Books and original artworks accepted.

If anyone is interested, mail me - I'll leave it a week or so and then order copies.
Is this a good idea? I may live to regret it but f*ck it I'm willing to give it a go...

Simeon (Simeon), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)

If people email you wanting the cheaper edition, you'll have to get them to specify that they will pay for the nicer edition if that's the majority opintion, Simeon..

You have definitely got the right Invisible Man, haven't you..?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)

OK so invisible man it is. finally we seem to have arrived at a choice.

someone should do a thread and when ppl read it we can add our thoughts to it (after a certain date of course (a month, say), so that no endings shall be given away).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah OK - for simplicity and clarification I'll restrict the offer to this edition (it's more likely to be in stock)
Ralph Ellison - Invisible Man, Penguin Modern Classic
It's the more expensive of the two editions but at £3.20($5), still cheaper than buying it secondhand from amazon.

Simeon (Simeon), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Great - that's the first one sorted, by the look of things, and thanks to Simeon for helping with discounts. Keep voting, because I think we should schedule a couple of things, to allow us to plan ahead where needed. Since the Eco is a new hardback, I think another one before that might be good, as some might get the Eco or a suitable book token at Xmas, or might find it more easily in a library then.

On this one, shall we say that we will open a thread for comments one month from now, on NOVEMBER 11th? If we prefix all threads relating to this book club activity 'Book Club:' we'll be able to find them all again easily, so this one could be called Book Club: Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. I'll start the thread if no one else does, but I see no reason why it matters who starts it. I see no need at all for rules within it either - it's pointless thinking we can avoid spoilers within it, obviously.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm. I can't find a consensus other than on Invisible Man and Baudolino (the new Eco). I still think we need something in between them, as explained above. Given that there have been a few Brett Easton Ellis mentions, for three different books, and that Glamorama has been mentioned twice, if we don't get some more votes very soon that could well be the December choice.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Like this you mean Nick?

(I was thinking of making a feature that would regenerate the New Answers page for any point throughout history, though it's be kind of scuppered by Greenspun not exporting message times)

Graham (graham), Saturday, 12 October 2002 13:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Martin - we have had a lot of Dostoyevsky mentions. Maybe we can slot a book of his in while we are waiting for the Eco to be released and come down in price? That assumes we can all pick one Dostoyevsky book to read.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, a quick search only reveals one person other than you mentioning him, Aaron - that was Plinky. I love Dostoyevsky and certainly wouldn't discourage that, but there are several others who have been mentioned more than once. Perhaps I should provide a list of those that have been mentioned more than once, and maybe you can give me some votes. In alphabetical order for fairness.

Anthony Bourdain - Kitchen Confidential
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Idiot
Brett Easton Ellis - Glamorama
Steve Erickson - Tours Of The Black Clock
James Joyce - Portrait or Dubliners
AL Kennedy - So I Am Glad
Jonathan Lethem - Motherless Brooklyn
Cormac McCarthy - Blood Meridian
Larry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & Ned
Vladimir Nabokov - Ada, Lolita, something else?
Michael Ondaatje - Coming Through The Slaughter
Thomas Pynchon - ?

You have one vote each. If you vote for an author without a specific book, please say what book or books you'd like. We'll give it a couple of days (especially as some only visit ILE in the week).

I'm still waiting for people to tell me I'm mismanaging this. So long as there aren't lots of complaints, I'll carry on.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 16:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Now that you've given us a deadline, I'm starting to panic here, Martin -- flashbacks, you know. ;)

I rilly want to read V./Mason&Dixon, but I think at this point it's a bit of a pipe dream to get through a fat Pynchon in a month. So my vote goes to The Idiot.

Leee (Leee), Saturday, 12 October 2002 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

No Motherless Brooklyn because of what Lethem did to ILM. ;-)

Nicole (Nicole), Saturday, 12 October 2002 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I have no idea what you are talking about, Nicole. Did Lethem introduce rockism into what had been a veritable Eden? And I'm not sure that we can afford to have a right of veto, though I guess a negative vote could separate equal votes.

And Leeeeeeee, there isn't a deadline: there is a date before which comments are abominated. It is true that if you want to chip in, finishing a month late is likely to mean you can't get much discussion. And it's not like you have to worry about being marked anyway, since the first book doesn't count to the final ILE Book Club Award.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 18:37 (twenty-three years ago)

i vote for 'the idiot' - dostoyevsky, as i can get it at my library for no cost :-) and i have wanted to read it for some time so this is a good push for me to get off my butt and do it.

donna (donna), Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm still waiting for people to tell me I'm mismanaging this.
Martin, You're doing a fine job!

If I've got one vote I'll vote Motherless Brooklyn, re-reading it may enlighten me as to exactly why it is such a great novel.

But if I could vote for one author I'd say Chuck Palanhuik (sp?), as I believe he's the most U&K author of recent decades...

(Plinky can you mail me, not sure you got my last mail)

Simeon (Simeon), Saturday, 12 October 2002 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I vote for Motherless Brooklyn, despite Lethem's Da Capo connections.

nory (nory), Sunday, 13 October 2002 00:34 (twenty-three years ago)

so wait is invisible man still the first selection?

Maria (Maria), Sunday, 13 October 2002 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, Invisible Man is first, to discuss from 11/11 (good start - US and UK date the same!). Eco will be third - we're trying to schedule one for in between the two.

I'm going to vote for Motherless Brooklyn too, I think. I've read one Lethem (Gun With Occasional Music) and fancy this. I've read The Idiot before.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 13 October 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's revive this, see if some weekday votes come in.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 14 October 2002 10:27 (twenty-three years ago)

(I'm surprised no one has called me on my "Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison are the same person" mentalism.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 12:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry to Nicole, but Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem wins, so that is our book to start discussing on December 11th. Eco's Baudolino to follow on January 11th. I'll try to remember to revive this thread periodically as a reminder to people, or to let newer people know what is happening. Most immediate thing: November 11th, discussion opens on Ralph Ellison's 'Invisible Man'. If the first couple go well, we can start voting on some more books and maybe rethinking our schedule and so on, in later December. Obviously if the thread on the first book gets three posts, we'll let it quietly die...

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, I was joking anyway. Motherless Brooklyn will be just fine. And possibly even dandy.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 17 October 2002 00:49 (twenty-three years ago)

OR IT MAY BE A DISASTER OF UNMITIGATED PROPORTIONS.

But we'll see about that. Can I submit my NaNoWriMo effort from next month when it's written? I wish to make Dan larf.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 October 2002 01:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't even know what a NaNo WriMo might be. Nano means a billionth or some such, Wri must mean Writer and Mo in this context must be Modernism, so, um...

Do you think you're the billionth person to write a Modernist piece, Ned?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 17 October 2002 10:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Clarity shall be thine, Martin. Last year a bunch of us tried it; I think I was the only one crazy enough to go the distance.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 October 2002 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)

I prefer my guess.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 18 October 2002 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Last call if you want a copy of Invisible Man at a 'cor blimey guv, I'm cuttting me own throat' price.
Mail me now, I'll order them tonight...

Simeon (Simeon), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 09:33 (twenty-three years ago)

this is great! Invisible Man is a perfect choice too, I've been meaning to read it for a long time.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm on page 54!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:02 (twenty-three years ago)

(Different editions make "I'm on page [xXx]" wankery completely useless and self-serving! Hurrah!)

Dan "Wanker" Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)

how does it stack up to the rest of richard wright's work, dan? ;)

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)

It's very evocative so far, but I tihnk he captured the mood better in _Roots_.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)

S'not fair, I'm still waiting on my copy from Simeon!

*throws tantrum*

Plinky (Plinky), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Mmm, should check this book out from the library -- or maybe it's on reserve now? Even more convenient if so.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 14:30 (twenty-three years ago)

awesome, I would love to read someone's NaNoWriMoNo one month. maybe December or January.

A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm currently reading Juneteenth, as I got my hands on it first (well, first this time - I first read IM years ago).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 23 October 2002 10:38 (twenty-three years ago)

two weeks pass...
Discussion on Invisible Man is under way elsewhere, but I thought I'd revive this to remind you that our next book, to be discussed on and from December 11th, is Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 11 November 2002 22:38 (twenty-three years ago)

A reminder that the ILE Book Club is intending to discuss Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem with a launch date of December 11th. I shall be starting my copy after just a few more books.

Given the slightly underwhelming response to our previous book, it might be good if anyone else actually reading/planning to read this said so, pour encourager les autres.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I keep meaning to pick up the library copy but stuff keeps coming up at work. Hopefully early next week!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm trying to get through Funnygan's Wait as fast as I can before getting into another book, so if I get it done by the end of the month, I'm definitely in with the MB.

Leee (Leee), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:30 (twenty-three years ago)

would anyone be up for reading Out Of Africa by Isak Dinesen sometime in the near future? I just got a really nice copy and I've been meaning to read it for a while.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:55 (twenty-three years ago)

i'd be up for reading that, i think my dad has a copy

the public library has motherless brooklyn, i'll get it next week when it's open

Maria (Maria), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Finnegan's wake is teh grebtest book evah!

man, Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:32 (twenty-three years ago)

i have a copy of mb and plan to read it

ron (ron), Saturday, 23 November 2002 07:54 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Finnegans Wake (no apostrophe, pedantry fans!) might be a rather ambitious one to cover here. I know several people on a list devoted to it.

My feeling on future books is that if this next one isn't an utter flop, so it does look worth continuing, I think that while we're getting round to the January book (Baudolino by Umberto Eco), we should be sorting out the next couple of choices via some sort of nomination and voting method. And thinking again about schedules, whether monthly suits us best, and so on. I suspect that monthly is about right.

How about this for a selection method: opening up nominations for a week, say a maximum of three nominations each, then a week of voting, say each of choosing five of the nominated books. The top three would be our next three books. I'm open to other proposals, but would be happy to continue to coordinate if no one else is keen to take over.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 23 November 2002 12:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Another reminder that the ILE Book Club is intending to discuss Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem with a launch date of December 11th. It could be your last chance to be a part of the ILE Book Club, given the levels of enthusiasm we are seeing here...

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 29 November 2002 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)

i am still intending to read. i really hope that this book club thing can continue because it helps me motivate reading-wise.

ron (ron), Saturday, 30 November 2002 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm starting MB next, tomorrow or Monday. I can't say this helps my motivation, but it might direct me to some interesting new books or authors, and the reading experience is enhanced by getting to discuss the books with a bunch of intelligent, interesting people who've also just read them.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 11:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Just wanted to say that I've gotten through the first chapter, and it flows very nicely and is enjoyable, "Motherless Brooklyn" is.

Leee (Leee), Monday, 2 December 2002 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)

martin - i read MUCH less than most on here, it seems. for instance i haven't read another book since invisible man.

ron (ron), Monday, 2 December 2002 01:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I just picked it up and shall begin tonight...

luna (luna.c), Monday, 2 December 2002 02:24 (twenty-three years ago)

it makes me extremely happy that so many people here love to read. most of the people i know think it's a waste of time, or a painful necessity, or only entertaining if you're unbelievably bored.

Maria (Maria), Monday, 2 December 2002 02:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Ron, just to let you know, in the past 5-6 months, I've read only two books, one of which was Invisible Man, and failed to finish a third. And I've got a degree in literature. And I've been known to say out loud, "I hate reading."

Leee (Leee), Monday, 2 December 2002 08:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it's those of us who read a lot who most often end up talking about what we have been reading, naturally, so the impression is probably distorted. I can't check while here at work, but I've read around eight books since the Ellison, including the one I shall finish on the tube home, so I'll be starting MB tonight. That will leave me plenty of time - I expect I'll finish it by the weekend.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)

thanks leee for trying to cheer me up. of course, one of the books you read was THAT book, the monstrosity!

mb is going pretty quickly - if i can't finish this one on time, the only possible explanation is that i sux0r

ron (ron), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 02:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Another reminder that the ILE Book Club is intending to discuss Motherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethem with a launch date of December 11th, one week today (here in England anyway - it's probably already tomorrow in Dunedin).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll have to beg off this -- too many things happening. Will try for next month!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I suspect that I may be discussing this book with myself. Still, at least I can be sure that everyone will display good taste, and no one will say anything stupid.

Except that I expected Motherless Brooklyn to be about the recent attempt to kidnap Victoria Beckham, and I feel cheated.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm sorry, Martin, I wanted to be in on this one, but I started Motherless Brooklyn last year and had an adverse reaction and stopped. (And I rarely leave novels unfinished!) Given how busy I am this month, I can't really justify giving it another shot.

But: Nory tells me she's just finished it, so it seems you will have at least one conversant.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I should say: I rarely leave contemporary novels unfinished -- sometimes I get too ambitious about the classics and stall. (Also I swear I did not stop reading A Dance to the Music of Time, I'm just taking a "little" break between volumes 2 and 3.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)

No apologies are necessary! I'm happy to read the book even if there is zero discussion.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:42 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm deeply into Motherless Brooklyn, no problems finishing it, and will try to give my tuppence, though I tend to bounce between technical criticspeak and fawning fanboyisms.

Leee (Leee), Thursday, 5 December 2002 06:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I have a couple nominations in mind, and hopefully we'll actually have the opportunity to name them and vote on them. Also, we can surely read some graphic novels; getting them may be more difficult, but completing it ought to be easier than a novel.

And "Motherless Brooklyn" in two days, people! (Or is just me and Martin?)

Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)

i finished last night. now if i can only think of something remotely interesting to say... ;-)

ron (ron), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm into it.

Douglas, Tuesday, 10 December 2002 03:07 (twenty-three years ago)

My friends started a book club called "The Edgar and Allan Frog Book Club Experience" (named after the vampire-slaying brothers in "The Lost Boys")--when I said I wanted to join, they were disappointed because there would then be THREE members of the book club, and hence they'd have to change the name to "The Edgar and Allan Frog & Sam (Corey Haim's character) Book Club Experience" which doesn't at all have a very nice ring to it.

Mandee, Tuesday, 10 December 2002 04:23 (twenty-three years ago)

so how bout it wolfshirt, you in or out?!?!? ;-)

ron (ron), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 07:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, I've finished MB (haha and four more books since!). I have no objection at all to comics being included, but they aren't generally easy to get from libraries, and are rarely found cheap secondhand, so the cost is likely to put some people off. Especially if I nominate the complete Lone Wolf & Cub - the last of its 8,500 pages in 28 volumes will be out in just a few weeks! Actually, old things like Watchmen or the original Dark Knight or maybe Jimmy Corrigan might not be so hard to find in libraries anyway, and I guess most comic fans will either have copies or be able to borrow one easily, so they wouldn't be such tough calls - newer expensive things might, though. Anyway, I'm sure we can all think of these factors while nominating and voting.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 13:55 (twenty-three years ago)

haha i will happily contribute to a discussion of watchmen

*starts hoiking phlegm into back of mouth*

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)

I liked Motherless Brooklyn, now will I have anything interesting to say is the question.

I'd rather not read comics because I live in a fairly rural area and don't have much spending money so I'd have a really hard time getting them.

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 23:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah, it is now the 11th, so the benefit of getting home late is a quick starter post on Motherless Brooklyn.

I notice that Newsweek, or some such big but possibly dumb mag, chose Lethem as its only author in its 100 people for the new millenium. Leaving aside the question of what the fuck sort of notion that list is in the first place, I do wonder what exactly sets this writer ahead of the pack. Motherless Brooklyn has lots of good points, but what is it that makes this author stand out? I can't see exactly what separates this from, for instance, Lawrence Block's Evan Tanner books - Tanner doesn't sleep, which strikes me as a gimmick/device/trope (delete to taste) very comparable to MB's protagonist's Tourette's. I'm not sure that Lethem makes any better use of this dominant notion. (I should note that I am a big admirer of Block, so this isn't too negative.) Actually, the disease as defining characteristic, its dominance, reminded me rather more of Stephen Donaldson's leprous protagonist.

On a mechanical genre level, I think it's rather lacking - the resolution with the giant was dramatically weak and unconvincing, for instance, and the ending is far too close to "and we all lived happily ever after".

I'm being too negative here. I expect that is because I get the impression that Lethem is regarded very, very highly, and I don't see that he is better than some other crime writers with real literary qualities - Block and James Lee Burke, for instance. I liked this well enough, but why the fuss?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 00:21 (twenty-three years ago)

The difference between the Tourette's gimmick and the no-sleep gimmick is that Tourette's (as Lethem uses it) is essentially _literary_--it allows Lethem to do all sorts of dazzling linguistic things with the tics. It doesn't just drive the plot of the book, it drives its language--when he stops ticcing, it necessarily alters the tone of a given scene.

Part of the car chase in the first scene takes place 3 blocks from my apartment, and he got the details exactly right.

Agreed that the denouement was lacking.

Douglas, Wednesday, 11 December 2002 00:33 (twenty-three years ago)

(Can I just say I read this 2 years ago & don't remember it well enough to add anything substantial, but I'm very interested in what you have to say.)

B.Rad (Brad), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)

i found myself wondering about the accuracy of tourette's depiction in the book. i don't mean that i was dubious, merely interested in how much i could depend on the novel to give me a true sense of what the condition is all about. i would imagine that one would research adequately before incorporating such a device into a book, but if anyone can enlighten...

about the ending: as i was approaching it, the basic 'whodunnit' chain of events was fairly clear, but i was hoping for more to be spelled out. which of course it was, but maybe a little too well, or a little too easily - the lionel/julia meetup at the lighthouse= too convenient? i kept wondering if other readers were resenting having everything laid out so neatly.

overall i enjoyed reading this, i kept thinking "this would make a pretty good movie." the first two chapters or so (the background stuff, setting the scene) were particularly well written, i thought.

ron (ron), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)

once the main plot gets going, the detective story cliches started rolling, which might have taken it down a notch for me. (i think that's what i mean)

ron (ron), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:31 (twenty-three years ago)

So, nominations.

Pynchon, V.
Odaatje, Coming through the slaughter
Frank Miller, Batman: Year One (if we do end up doing comix, I think it may be riper ground for discussion than DKR)

Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 08:29 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, nominations it is. First I'll remind everyone that our next selection, for discussion from January 11th, is Baudolino by Umberto Eco.

The suggested process, from which there has been no dissension, is this: anyone can nominate a maximum of three books, over the next week - so nominations close after Christmas Eve. There is no point in using your nomination on something someone else has already nominated. When I get a chance, soon after Christmas, I'll list all those nominated, and we can get on with voting. Shall we allow five votes each?

I may not be online too much for periods over Christmas - spending lots of time with my girlfriend, I hope - so if anyone else is keen to take over this facilitatorish role, it's a good time to say so!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:41 (twenty-three years ago)

No more nominations, I notice. I think this is dead in the water. Is anyone reading Baudolino for the January 11th discussion?

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)

um, if i can get it at the local library and read it in time I'm in for the 11th.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 18:35 (twenty-three years ago)

afraid not, i'm too involved with my other reading. but i'm not that big a contributor to discussion anyway...and i want to next month i swear!

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)

i bought a copy but have had little luck with getting started, i don't think it's up my alley. i hope the book club idea will not be lost, but admit there seems to be limited interest. i'd give it a shot with another book, or maybe somebody who's further into baudolino can talk me into liking it. finishing by the 11th is seriously doubtful, however

ron (ron), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 20:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Given that no one seems to be expecting to finish Baudolino by the 11th, and given that no one has followed Leee's nominations in two weeks, I don't think it's a goer myself.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 1 January 2003 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)

three weeks pass...
back from 2 months of internet-free life. (due to poverty, not to weird experiment in asceticism/hermitage)

i tried to stick to a partial book club reading program:
i've read invisible man, and i just finished Baudolino last night. am i the only one who's read it?

[hello inter-friendlies!]

gabriel (gabe), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

This was a wonderful idea, please don't lose it. Personally, I have never joined in the discussions following reading the books but I have followed them with avid interest. Let me tell you why this has been so important for me (and perhaps other lurkers?) I've been ill for the last 7 years almost and one of the most difficult to cope with aspects of the illness is that my cognitive function has been severely impaired. So much so, that I haven't been able to read a book for the entire period. Until now that is. I can't begin to explain the sense of achievement I got when I finally finished "Invisible Man" and even though I didn't contribute to the ensuing discussion here, I eagerly swallowed it up and silently debated with all of you. I'm still not in a position to join a book club IRL so this forum has been massively valuable to me. It's helped give me back something I've been missing for the longest time and without the deadlines and (albeit loose) discipline required to keep up with you guys, I know I'll fall by the wayside again.

So once again, please keep it going. If for some reason you can't/don't want to, thanks for doing it thus far, it was much more valuable than some of you can ever imagine.

anonbutgrateful, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)

That's very good to hear, anonbutgrateful. Nobody killed the idea, it just fizzled out through lack of interest: no one read Baudolino at the time, no one followed Leee in making nominations. I'd be up for restarting if there was the interest, but I don't think there is.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe non-fiction would be better?

I am one of those people who helped to nominate books initially and then didn't participate. I didn't lose interest. I never finished Invisible Man! I am a jerk.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Not to insinuate that anyone else who expressed inital intrest is a jerk for not following through... I *know* I was being lazy!

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

There seemed to me to be rather less enthusiasm for non-fiction, in general and when anyone suggested specific books.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)

its not that I'm lazy but I'm reading SF and I don't want anything to get in the way otherwise it will throw me off.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry i can't do it for the next month or two. waaaay too many books i'm in the middle of, on top of a research paper on joyce. i like the idea of the book club and want to join again if it stays in a few months, though.

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Is there something due for February 11?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Nah, it fell apart before we got that far, Aaron.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)

and yeah basically my research means that I can't read much more than what i'm doing on the train going to and back from work.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
anyone interested in reviving this idea? didn't exactly go over like gangbusters before, but i would be up for it... if someone says yes, i'll start making nominations and then whomever else would like to can as well.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

So....

Uncle Tom's Cabin, anyone?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

yes

must revisit a library tomorrow for the first time in like 18 months tho

deeznuts, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

i'm in!

horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

deadline? 2 weeks?

deeznuts, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)

Let's give ppl time to find and read the book; I say Aug 1.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:47 (seventeen years ago)

okay! are we allowed to post as we read? i think there's probably little danger of spoiling?

horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)

Last time I think we had a separate thread to actually talk about the book. Let me look...

HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)

Book Club: Invisible Man

lol at the revive

HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:51 (seventeen years ago)

k this sounds good.

Frogman Henry, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)

oh wow bummer i missed invisible man!

horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)

I'm in! I'll have it read over the weekend after the bar exam, when my brane is running like an out-of-control sports car down a mountain, and will need something to slow down on.

B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:01 (seventeen years ago)

It's available free online if you want to read it that way, google for "uncle tom's cabin text".

Jaq, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)

AAGH

i forgot about this till just now

are we still down? i think maybe an uncle toms cabin discussion thread should be started

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)

Okay, I'm a sucker for this kind of thing, so I'm in.

Sara R-C, Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)

Isn't it meant to be quite difficult to get the original version since there've been so many abridged versions? Someone told me that once

I know, right?, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:12 (seventeen years ago)

i dunno but im hitting up the local library in t-15 mins so ill let u know

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:14 (seventeen years ago)

We should still do this, but remember that the deadline to finish the book is Aug 1; I don't think we're in any rush to start a thread.

HI DERE, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:14 (seventeen years ago)

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/StoCabi.html

Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:15 (seventeen years ago)

theres no rush but it might be a decent idea to pique interest & allow ongoing commentary

im not gonna start it obv but i hope someone will

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)

i will do this unless i start reading it and decide it sucks, at which point i will read something else.

COMMITMENT THY NAME IS ME

BLACK BEYONCE, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:17 (seventeen years ago)

Well, I can see where the English major thing didn't pan out.

Sara R-C, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)

i started to read it online but there were, like, too many commas

Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:19 (seventeen years ago)

i spend way 2 much time on em but there is no way im reading this fucking thing at a computer myself

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)

GOT IT YO

who is with me?

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:48 (seventeen years ago)

Is this actually happening?

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:04 (seventeen years ago)

i'm going to reread this book and post about it even if noone else does.

horseshoe, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)

K. I'm your Huckleberry.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

yay!

horseshoe, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

I've read two chapters. So at this rate I might be done by Christmas.

(I'll try to do better, though.)

Sara R-C, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

could we extend the deadline *? i'd like to participate but i'll be on holiday for the next week sans pc/book.

*to say, 20th aug?

Frogman Henry, Sunday, 3 August 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)

Mickey and I had like a two-person Russian lit bookclub thing last summer! It was way fun.

Abbott, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)

This incarnation looks interesting:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61ynMoMf06L.jpg

Abbott, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51PKYGVNWWL._SL500_BO2,204,203,200_PIlitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20_.jpg

I like NOrton Critical Editions too.

Abbott, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)

I'm still reading, so I'm all for extending deadline... Aug. 20. Hey, I might actually finish by then! Maybe.

Sara R-C, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.