― A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lek Dukagjin, Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:21 (twenty-three years ago)
i'll be reading ellison's "invisible man" for class this semester, maybe we could organise around that...
― mike (ro)bott, Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Saturday, 5 October 2002 00:42 (twenty-three years ago)
a chapter a week, and no reading ahead!!
who's interested?
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 02:09 (twenty-three years ago)
tho it mught be better to start with something shorter...
i haven't r3ad invisible man...
non-fiction maybe?
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 02:16 (twenty-three years ago)
And I think Umberto Eco's new book and Invisible Man are both good suggestions...
It seems that fiction is easier to discuss than non-fiction...there's more room for interpretation.
― nory (nory), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)
i need to know more.
― mike (ro)bott, Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― nory (nory), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)
i would like to try to do this, if i can't keep up with y'all i'll just try again on the next one (i don't read much, unfortunately, but maybe this will help me keep at it)
― ron (ron), Saturday, 5 October 2002 03:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Elisabeth (Elisabeth), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Saturday, 5 October 2002 04:40 (twenty-three years ago)
"It is April 1204, and Constantinople, the splendid capital of the Byzantine Empire, is being sacked and burned by the knights of the Fourth Crusade. Amid the carnage and confusion, one Baudolino saves a historian and high court official from certain death at the hands of the crusading warriors and proceeds to tell his own fantastical story.
Born a simple peasant in northern Italy, Baudolino has two major gifts--a talent for learning languages and a skill in telling lies. When still a boy he meets a foreign commander in the woods, charming him with his quick wit and lively mind. The commander--who proves to be Emperor Frederick Barbarossa--adopts Baudolino and sends him to the university in Paris, where he makes a number of fearless, adventurous friends.
Spurred on by myths and their own reveries, this merry band sets out in search of Prester John, a legendary priest-king said to rule over a vast kingdom in the East--a phantasmagorical land of strange creatures with eyes on their shoulders and mouths on their stomachs, of eunuchs, unicorns, and lovely maidens.
As always with Eco, this abundant novel includes dazzling digressions, outrageous tricks, extraordinary feeling, and vicarious reflections on our postmodern age. This is Eco the storyteller at his brilliant best."
the english translation will be available for shoplifting on Oct. 15
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 05:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 05:48 (twenty-three years ago)
I was in a real-world reading club about ten years ago, for a while. It was generally middlebrow literary stuff - most Booker nominees would have been ideal. The mechanism, which I mention as a possible one to use here, is that we would agree a term's list in advance (it was run in a local college so took those breaks), and we would know what book we were going to discuss each week at least a month before. Someone would sort of lead/introduce each book, we would all be given a chance for our say, and general open discussion was pretty limited. Since there is no time/space limit here, that stuff is irrelevant, and anyone can put in their comments anytime. However, I would not be interested if it's a chapter-a-week basis. I'd rather say that we will open discussion of Book A (nominations and voting for a list, maybe) on, say, November 1st; talk about book B will begin on Nov 8th (or after whatever agreed interval); and so on.
A list means that those without time for a book a week can pick and choose, setting the dates way in advance gives us time to find and read the book at our own pace, and we aren't imposing an intolerably slow rate for others - if you're fast and have time you can leave it until October 30th to start reading! We could make nominations for books we'd be interested in doing - maybe put all those that get two nominations to a vote to compose the advance list.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 11:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 October 2002 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 5 October 2002 19:37 (twenty-three years ago)
I'll post some things I fancy reading tomorrow, see if any are of wider interest.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― hint hint (mark s), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:29 (twenty-three years ago)
I ought to leave the question of discussion frequency up to the employed swine among us, as I actually have nothing to do BUT read lately, but the potential for chaos in a weekly setup appeals to me--the result would be a nicely decentralized discussion system. I imagine that there would be concurrent discussions on several different books- which i find more in the spirit of ile than a monolithic READ THESE PAGES BY FRIDAY sorta system.
and i second Ned's alternating fiction with non-fiction idea.i have been feasting on the bloated corpse of fiction for too long, and have grown fat and listless.
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Saturday, 5 October 2002 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)
Fiction:Faulkner - Sound and The FuryThomas Pynchon - Crying of Lot 49Proust - Swann's WayItalo Calvino- If on a winter's night a travelerJoyce - DublinersNabokov - Pale FireDostoevsky - Notes From UndergroundTolstoy - Death of Ivan IlychSolzhenitsyn - Matryona's Housea bunch from the 20th century Russian Reader edited by Clarence Brown
Non-Fiction:Stephen Hawkins - A Brief History of TimeBrian Greene - The Elegant UniverseG.K. Chesterton - OrthodoxyGeorge Smoot - Wrinkles in Time
but I'm open to pretty much anything not very bad
― A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Saturday, 5 October 2002 21:42 (twenty-three years ago)
and a shorter list of non-fiction:Gilbert Adair - Surfing The Zeitgeist (criticism)Will Self - Sore Sites (on architecture - remaindered in the UK)Keith Waterhouse - English Our English (on good writing)Jon Savage - England's Dreaming (on punk)Ronin Ro - Have Gun Will Travel (on Death Row Records)
More nominations? Votes on those already suggested (not just by me, obviously - Baudolino by Umberto Eco should also be counted, I think)? Who is interested at all?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 14:52 (twenty-three years ago)
(since this is something which would need a whole crop of threads, wouldn't it require its own board?)
― thom west (thom w), Sunday, 6 October 2002 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 18:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Sunday, 6 October 2002 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lek Dukagjin, Sunday, 6 October 2002 19:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Sunday, 6 October 2002 20:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:07 (twenty-three years ago)
How about if we start voting for what to read? Not to close off nominations, but how about we name five books, either already mentioned or new, that we want to do. The ones that get most support can be the first couple we do, and then we can reassess continuing, schedules and selection processes after that. By the way, do tell me to bugger off if you don't like my taking charge if this - I really don't want to seem as if I'm imposing anything on anyone.
My five, all from my own list, unsurprisingly:Steve Erickson - Tours Of The Black ClockRichard Powers - Galatea 2.2George Konrad - The LoserLarry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & NedWill Self - Sore Sites (on architecture - remaindered in the UK, but may not be available in the US - anyone know? If it isn't available, I'll have Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian as my reserve choice!)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Well, the title alone, after all. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 October 2002 21:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Sunday, 6 October 2002 22:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Sunday, 6 October 2002 22:41 (twenty-three years ago)
Here are my nominations (chosen because they're on my list, anyway, and they seem like books people here could be interested in and entertained by):
Empire Falls by Richard RussoThe Eyre Affair by Jasper FfordeNumber9Dream by David MitchellMotherless Brooklyn by Jonathan Lethemand I'll second Blood Meridian, since I've never read any Cormac McCarthy
It's quite possible some of these books aren't available yet outside the U.S. (oh, and Martin, it looks like Sore Sites would be tough to get here), so I'll have Rules of Attraction (as I haven't read any Bret Easton Ellis, either), as my alternate.
― nory (nory), Monday, 7 October 2002 02:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― isadora, Monday, 7 October 2002 03:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 7 October 2002 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Monday, 7 October 2002 03:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― Livvie, Monday, 7 October 2002 06:55 (twenty-three years ago)
We read some classic book club books and some not so classic:
Diary of a Geisha by Arthur ElgarThe White Bone'Tis by Frank McCourtBridget Jones' Diary (summer book club on the beach selection)White Teeth by Zadie SmithThe Lord of the Rings Trilogy (! -- X-mas holiday homework selection)The Girls' Guide to Hunting and FishingSeabiscuit: An American LegendMotherless Brooklyn by Jonathan LethamInto the Wild by Jon KrakauerA script written by one of our membersand a bunch of others I don't recall.
We took turns hosting and whoever was hosting chose the book. It was all very casual -- reading the book was optional, even for the hostess, but again, this was more of a social thing than most book clubs.
I'm terrible about reading the books in time, but it seems to me that it might be fun for you to conduct at least part of the ILE book club as a live internet chat at an agreed time or times, and you could always post the transcript for people to continue responding to later.
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 7 October 2002 07:10 (twenty-three years ago)
Jonathan Lethem / Motherless Brooklyn (and)Ellison / The Invisible Man
and suggest:
A L Kennedy / So I am Glad (hello david howie).Doris Lessing / Martha Quest(and) Alan Warner / Morvern Callar (because there's so my hype around the film and it puts me off a bit but I'd quite like to force myself to read it).
But I don't care if you ignore these. I'd rather have the incentive to read something I probably otherwise wouldn't.
― Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 15:43 (twenty-three years ago)
Curiously, Morvern Callar was one of the first books we did and also received one of the worst overall ratings (yes, we marked books out of 100 in a kind of only semi-joking way). I remember one of my female friends objections was that it was clearly written by a man as the idea of warming one's knickers on the kettle was v.unrealistic.
Books that got the highest approval:
THE WIND UP BIRD CHRONICLE by Haruki MurakamiA Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy TooleBirthday Letters by Ted Hughes
Books that got the highest disapproval:Morvern Callar by Alan WarnerThe Woman in Black by Susan HillGirlfriend in a Coma by Douglas CouplandHotel World by Ali Smith (though by this stage there were only about three of us in attendance)
Books that divided us most:The Black Prince by Iris MurdochThe God of Small Things by Arundhati RoyNight by Elie WeiselThe Inimitable Jeeves by PG WodehouseThe Third Policeman by Flann O'Brien
Honorary mention for 'interesting discussion':Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov
Now that I've left London they are planning on starting it up again. With Roy Keane's autobiography.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ellie (Ellie), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 7 October 2002 16:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 18:43 (twenty-three years ago)
nonfiction:I dunno. Primary source social theory type shit. Or perhaps something about the Beatles *ducks*
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 7 October 2002 18:57 (twenty-three years ago)
who wants to go first?
500 posts by tomorrow morning otherwise I'll wear a burka.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)
"Don Quixote" by Cervantes"Ada, or Ardor" by NabakovAnything by MurakamiThe new Umberto Ecoand since I've been on a Nabakov kick lately, any of the classic Russian authors would be great to get an idea of his influences.
However, I will go along with just about anything. I haven't seen the Self book on architecture here in the US, though I typically look in the fiction section, so that might be why.
― Nick A., Monday, 7 October 2002 19:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― amy (amy), Monday, 7 October 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)
(I don't quite understand how in the world one book will ever be chosen)
― nory (nory), Monday, 7 October 2002 20:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 20:17 (twenty-three years ago)
But seriously, I'm up for any Pynchon; it'd be fantastic to revisit Invisible Man and some of the "easier" Nabokov. And Virginia Woolf and Michael Ondaatje. And I keep meaning to check into Dostoevsky.
No to Blood Merde!ian and to Delillo.
― Leee, Monday, 7 October 2002 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Monday, 7 October 2002 21:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Nabokov and Dostoyevsky seem popular, though without a particular book emerging. Invisible Man is going strongly (can I confirm that we are all thinking Ralph Ellison? I presume so). I'm not sure there is a veto available, and I'm guessing that if this is a runner people will drop in and out depending on the books selected.
I've read loads of the books being nominated (including that), A, but that's not such a bad thing. I did think Portrait a bit dull - FW and U are too ambitious, I think (and we have a genuine Joyce expert in our midst, so there is a risk of imbalance), but Dubliners would get my support.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 October 2002 21:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― mike (ro)bott, Monday, 7 October 2002 22:20 (twenty-three years ago)
Perhaps we should codify the "rules" of the club before picking the books. Are we set on reading one book per month? I would prefer to read one book every three weeks, but I am not going to press my case, especially since it is better to err on the side of too much time instead of not enough. If we choose to do one book per month, then we should conduct the surveys once every three or four months, and pick either three or four books each time. I know you have stated similar sentiments above, Martin, and, seeing as there is plenty of interest, we should decide on these matters soon. This will give some direction to this thread and the ones that follow. If we, for instance, decide to choose four books every four months, then it will be much easier to sort through this thread to reach some sort of consensus.
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 7 October 2002 22:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 08:28 (twenty-three years ago)
Has anyone else read this? Is it as appalling as it looks?
― RickyT (RickyT), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)
i stole it from Barnes and Noble a few weeks ago, but i'm a little scared to read it alone.
― gabriel rodriguez-doerr (gabe), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:42 (twenty-three years ago)
Pnin - if we want something on the lighter side. It's pretty funny, a great store, and not as "difficult" as other Nabakov.
The Real Life of Sebastian Knight - a little harder to follow, but not particularly long, and would probably inspire some good discussion/arguments.
Pale Fire - again, would inspire good discussion, and I didn't really find it as hard to follow as some others seem to think it would be.
Those would be my top recommendations of the ones I've read.
A question about the rules of the book club: Would there be an assignment of a few chapters per week, or would be reading and discussing at our own pace?
― Nick A., Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick A., Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:30 (twenty-three years ago)
sorry to be oblique, but just in case spoilers are an issue
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)
Maybe two threads a month? One for an established classic, and one for something more contemporary? That way, people could pick and choose, or do both.
― nory (nory), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 12:40 (twenty-three years ago)
On Ondaatje, I haven't read anything before "In The Skin of A Lion," which I'm way more than willing to reread for the third time. But aside from that, I nominate "Coming Through the Slaughter" which is "about" Buddy Bolden. "English Patient" suxors, so we shall keep at arm's distance.
And Pynchon may not be so feasible after all... either a 600+ page tome with incredibly dense writing in only a month, or a dense 150 page novel (still with dense writing) over one month, and IMO Lot 49 is a two week book.
And I am a Joyce/Ulysses expert-in-training.
― Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 18:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 18:33 (twenty-three years ago)
I can't believe anyone would read Divine Secrets -- ew ew ew!
But it's the concluding part of the epic fantasy trilogy for Lifetime network watchers. (The preceding two parts are of course Steel Magnolias and Fried Green Tomatoes; together, set in the mythic land known as the American South, they allow everyone a chance to escape from their humdrum lives -- as well as being the only fantasy works acceptable to mainstream critics that aren't written in Spanish).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 21:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:47 (twenty-three years ago)
Jody Beth and I conferred and would like to suggest Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential for the nonfiction section of all this. All food-happy people should read it, I think!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 04:06 (twenty-three years ago)
Yes, and leave it to the New York Times Book Review to compare Bourdain to Iggy Pop (that noted culinary authority). Hmmm.
― Jody Beth Rosen, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 04:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Micheline Gros-Jean (Micheline), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 06:18 (twenty-three years ago)
If enough of the the ILE group were to settle on a Penguin book to read I could get copies at massive discount - We could settle up with Paypal. (please, don't anybody ask for individual copies of anything - I just can't do it)
I'll put another vote in for Invisible Man, as I've never read it.Also I'd recommend "Twelve Bar Blues" by Patrick Neate which won last years Whitbread Novel Award and would appeal to many here as it has a musical bent. Surprisingly I can't find mention of it on ILX.
― Simeon (Simeon), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― katie (katie), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)
Oh my.
Bourdain is definitely his own style of crabby bastard, I'll grant you.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)
"What kind of glue-sniffing, crackhead mesomorphs you got working for you? You don't have an order for me? What?! I called the shit in myself... I spoke to a human! I didn't even leave it on the tape! And you're telling me you don't have my order? I got three fucking produce companies! THREE! AND IT'S ALWAYS YOU THAT FUCKS ME IN THE ASS!"
― Jody Beth Rosen, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)
I take the point about the price of a brand new book like the Eco, but surely if we give it a month or two it will be reasonably easily available in libraries? Invisible Man is going very strongly, so that might be the first choice. Let's set a deadline for votes - how about midnight on Friday? That's 48 and a quarter hours from now...
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 21:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 09:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Plinky (Plinky), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― nory (nory), Thursday, 10 October 2002 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Hey, has everyone/anyone read _Going After Cacciato_?
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 10 October 2002 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)
-- Andrew Thames
Yeah, Juneteenth came out last year to mixed reviews, some hailed at as genius others thought the way the executor had cut and pasted to come up with a final copy was v. obvious and that this should not even be considered an Ellison book. Haven't read it so can't tell you either way.
― H (Heruy), Thursday, 10 October 2002 13:57 (twenty-three years ago)
I'd rather order X number of one or the other - just because I'm easily confused. I think it would be better to all be reading the same edition as we can refer to page numbers if need be.
This is totally an non-profit offer by the way. I'll abuse the company post for mailing out (Hi Googling employer!)I guess you could send me something interesting in the post if you didn't want to use paypal. Cool CDR's, Books and original artworks accepted.
If anyone is interested, mail me - I'll leave it a week or so and then order copies.Is this a good idea? I may live to regret it but f*ck it I'm willing to give it a go...
― Simeon (Simeon), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)
You have definitely got the right Invisible Man, haven't you..?
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)
someone should do a thread and when ppl read it we can add our thoughts to it (after a certain date of course (a month, say), so that no endings shall be given away).
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Simeon (Simeon), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)
On this one, shall we say that we will open a thread for comments one month from now, on NOVEMBER 11th? If we prefix all threads relating to this book club activity 'Book Club:' we'll be able to find them all again easily, so this one could be called Book Club: Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. I'll start the thread if no one else does, but I see no reason why it matters who starts it. I see no need at all for rules within it either - it's pointless thinking we can avoid spoilers within it, obviously.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 11 October 2002 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)
(I was thinking of making a feature that would regenerate the New Answers page for any point throughout history, though it's be kind of scuppered by Greenspun not exporting message times)
― Graham (graham), Saturday, 12 October 2002 13:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)
Anthony Bourdain - Kitchen ConfidentialFyodor Dostoyevsky - The IdiotBrett Easton Ellis - GlamoramaSteve Erickson - Tours Of The Black ClockJames Joyce - Portrait or DublinersAL Kennedy - So I Am GladJonathan Lethem - Motherless BrooklynCormac McCarthy - Blood MeridianLarry McMurtry & Diana Ossana - Zeke & NedVladimir Nabokov - Ada, Lolita, something else?Michael Ondaatje - Coming Through The SlaughterThomas Pynchon - ?
You have one vote each. If you vote for an author without a specific book, please say what book or books you'd like. We'll give it a couple of days (especially as some only visit ILE in the week).
I'm still waiting for people to tell me I'm mismanaging this. So long as there aren't lots of complaints, I'll carry on.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 16:31 (twenty-three years ago)
I rilly want to read V./Mason&Dixon, but I think at this point it's a bit of a pipe dream to get through a fat Pynchon in a month. So my vote goes to The Idiot.
― Leee (Leee), Saturday, 12 October 2002 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Saturday, 12 October 2002 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)
And Leeeeeeee, there isn't a deadline: there is a date before which comments are abominated. It is true that if you want to chip in, finishing a month late is likely to mean you can't get much discussion. And it's not like you have to worry about being marked anyway, since the first book doesn't count to the final ILE Book Club Award.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 18:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Saturday, 12 October 2002 19:06 (twenty-three years ago)
If I've got one vote I'll vote Motherless Brooklyn, re-reading it may enlighten me as to exactly why it is such a great novel.
But if I could vote for one author I'd say Chuck Palanhuik (sp?), as I believe he's the most U&K author of recent decades...
(Plinky can you mail me, not sure you got my last mail)
― Simeon (Simeon), Saturday, 12 October 2002 22:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― nory (nory), Sunday, 13 October 2002 00:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Sunday, 13 October 2002 00:50 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm going to vote for Motherless Brooklyn too, I think. I've read one Lethem (Gun With Occasional Music) and fancy this. I've read The Idiot before.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 13 October 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 14 October 2002 10:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 12:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 16 October 2002 20:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 17 October 2002 00:49 (twenty-three years ago)
But we'll see about that. Can I submit my NaNoWriMo effort from next month when it's written? I wish to make Dan larf.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 October 2002 01:39 (twenty-three years ago)
Do you think you're the billionth person to write a Modernist piece, Ned?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 17 October 2002 10:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 October 2002 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 18 October 2002 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Simeon (Simeon), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 09:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan "Wanker" Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)
*throws tantrum*
― Plinky (Plinky), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 13:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 14:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 22 October 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 23 October 2002 10:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 11 November 2002 22:38 (twenty-three years ago)
Given the slightly underwhelming response to our previous book, it might be good if anyone else actually reading/planning to read this said so, pour encourager les autres.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 23 November 2002 00:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 23 November 2002 02:55 (twenty-three years ago)
the public library has motherless brooklyn, i'll get it next week when it's open
― Maria (Maria), Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― man, Saturday, 23 November 2002 03:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Saturday, 23 November 2002 07:54 (twenty-three years ago)
My feeling on future books is that if this next one isn't an utter flop, so it does look worth continuing, I think that while we're getting round to the January book (Baudolino by Umberto Eco), we should be sorting out the next couple of choices via some sort of nomination and voting method. And thinking again about schedules, whether monthly suits us best, and so on. I suspect that monthly is about right.
How about this for a selection method: opening up nominations for a week, say a maximum of three nominations each, then a week of voting, say each of choosing five of the nominated books. The top three would be our next three books. I'm open to other proposals, but would be happy to continue to coordinate if no one else is keen to take over.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 23 November 2002 12:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 29 November 2002 21:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Saturday, 30 November 2002 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 11:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Monday, 2 December 2002 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Monday, 2 December 2002 01:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Monday, 2 December 2002 02:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Monday, 2 December 2002 02:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Monday, 2 December 2002 08:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)
mb is going pretty quickly - if i can't finish this one on time, the only possible explanation is that i sux0r
― ron (ron), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 02:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)
Except that I expected Motherless Brooklyn to be about the recent attempt to kidnap Victoria Beckham, and I feel cheated.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)
But: Nory tells me she's just finished it, so it seems you will have at least one conversant.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Thursday, 5 December 2002 06:15 (twenty-three years ago)
And "Motherless Brooklyn" in two days, people! (Or is just me and Martin?)
― Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 02:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 02:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Douglas, Tuesday, 10 December 2002 03:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mandee, Tuesday, 10 December 2002 04:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 07:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 13:55 (twenty-three years ago)
*starts hoiking phlegm into back of mouth*
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 14:01 (twenty-three years ago)
I'd rather not read comics because I live in a fairly rural area and don't have much spending money so I'd have a really hard time getting them.
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 10 December 2002 23:29 (twenty-three years ago)
I notice that Newsweek, or some such big but possibly dumb mag, chose Lethem as its only author in its 100 people for the new millenium. Leaving aside the question of what the fuck sort of notion that list is in the first place, I do wonder what exactly sets this writer ahead of the pack. Motherless Brooklyn has lots of good points, but what is it that makes this author stand out? I can't see exactly what separates this from, for instance, Lawrence Block's Evan Tanner books - Tanner doesn't sleep, which strikes me as a gimmick/device/trope (delete to taste) very comparable to MB's protagonist's Tourette's. I'm not sure that Lethem makes any better use of this dominant notion. (I should note that I am a big admirer of Block, so this isn't too negative.) Actually, the disease as defining characteristic, its dominance, reminded me rather more of Stephen Donaldson's leprous protagonist.
On a mechanical genre level, I think it's rather lacking - the resolution with the giant was dramatically weak and unconvincing, for instance, and the ending is far too close to "and we all lived happily ever after".
I'm being too negative here. I expect that is because I get the impression that Lethem is regarded very, very highly, and I don't see that he is better than some other crime writers with real literary qualities - Block and James Lee Burke, for instance. I liked this well enough, but why the fuss?
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 00:21 (twenty-three years ago)
Part of the car chase in the first scene takes place 3 blocks from my apartment, and he got the details exactly right.
Agreed that the denouement was lacking.
― Douglas, Wednesday, 11 December 2002 00:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― B.Rad (Brad), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:11 (twenty-three years ago)
about the ending: as i was approaching it, the basic 'whodunnit' chain of events was fairly clear, but i was hoping for more to be spelled out. which of course it was, but maybe a little too well, or a little too easily - the lionel/julia meetup at the lighthouse= too convenient? i kept wondering if other readers were resenting having everything laid out so neatly.
overall i enjoyed reading this, i kept thinking "this would make a pretty good movie." the first two chapters or so (the background stuff, setting the scene) were particularly well written, i thought.
― ron (ron), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:31 (twenty-three years ago)
Pynchon, V.Odaatje, Coming through the slaughterFrank Miller, Batman: Year One (if we do end up doing comix, I think it may be riper ground for discussion than DKR)
― Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 08:29 (twenty-three years ago)
The suggested process, from which there has been no dissension, is this: anyone can nominate a maximum of three books, over the next week - so nominations close after Christmas Eve. There is no point in using your nomination on something someone else has already nominated. When I get a chance, soon after Christmas, I'll list all those nominated, and we can get on with voting. Shall we allow five votes each?
I may not be online too much for periods over Christmas - spending lots of time with my girlfriend, I hope - so if anyone else is keen to take over this facilitatorish role, it's a good time to say so!
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 17 December 2002 21:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 18:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 18:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 19:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― ron (ron), Tuesday, 31 December 2002 20:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 1 January 2003 20:15 (twenty-three years ago)
i tried to stick to a partial book club reading program: i've read invisible man, and i just finished Baudolino last night. am i the only one who's read it?
[hello inter-friendlies!]
― gabriel (gabe), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)
So once again, please keep it going. If for some reason you can't/don't want to, thanks for doing it thus far, it was much more valuable than some of you can ever imagine.
― anonbutgrateful, Tuesday, 28 January 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
I am one of those people who helped to nominate books initially and then didn't participate. I didn't lose interest. I never finished Invisible Man! I am a jerk.
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 28 January 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)
So....
Uncle Tom's Cabin, anyone?
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)
yes
must revisit a library tomorrow for the first time in like 18 months tho
― deeznuts, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
i'm in!
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
deadline? 2 weeks?
― deeznuts, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
Let's give ppl time to find and read the book; I say Aug 1.
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:47 (seventeen years ago)
okay! are we allowed to post as we read? i think there's probably little danger of spoiling?
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
Last time I think we had a separate thread to actually talk about the book. Let me look...
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)
Book Club: Invisible Man
lol at the revive
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:51 (seventeen years ago)
k this sounds good.
― Frogman Henry, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
oh wow bummer i missed invisible man!
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
I'm in! I'll have it read over the weekend after the bar exam, when my brane is running like an out-of-control sports car down a mountain, and will need something to slow down on.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:01 (seventeen years ago)
It's available free online if you want to read it that way, google for "uncle tom's cabin text".
― Jaq, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
AAGH
i forgot about this till just now
are we still down? i think maybe an uncle toms cabin discussion thread should be started
― deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
Okay, I'm a sucker for this kind of thing, so I'm in.
― Sara R-C, Thursday, 10 July 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
Isn't it meant to be quite difficult to get the original version since there've been so many abridged versions? Someone told me that once
― I know, right?, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
i dunno but im hitting up the local library in t-15 mins so ill let u know
― deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:14 (seventeen years ago)
We should still do this, but remember that the deadline to finish the book is Aug 1; I don't think we're in any rush to start a thread.
― HI DERE, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:14 (seventeen years ago)
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/StoCabi.html
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
theres no rush but it might be a decent idea to pique interest & allow ongoing commentary
im not gonna start it obv but i hope someone will
― deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
i will do this unless i start reading it and decide it sucks, at which point i will read something else.
COMMITMENT THY NAME IS ME
― BLACK BEYONCE, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:17 (seventeen years ago)
Well, I can see where the English major thing didn't pan out.
― Sara R-C, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
i started to read it online but there were, like, too many commas
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:19 (seventeen years ago)
i spend way 2 much time on em but there is no way im reading this fucking thing at a computer myself
― deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
GOT IT YO
who is with me?
― deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:48 (seventeen years ago)
Is this actually happening?
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:04 (seventeen years ago)
i'm going to reread this book and post about it even if noone else does.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)
K. I'm your Huckleberry.
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
yay!
― horseshoe, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
I've read two chapters. So at this rate I might be done by Christmas.
(I'll try to do better, though.)
― Sara R-C, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
could we extend the deadline *? i'd like to participate but i'll be on holiday for the next week sans pc/book.
*to say, 20th aug?
― Frogman Henry, Sunday, 3 August 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)
Mickey and I had like a two-person Russian lit bookclub thing last summer! It was way fun.
― Abbott, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)
This incarnation looks interesting:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61ynMoMf06L.jpg
― Abbott, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51PKYGVNWWL._SL500_BO2,204,203,200_PIlitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20_.jpg
I like NOrton Critical Editions too.
I'm still reading, so I'm all for extending deadline... Aug. 20. Hey, I might actually finish by then! Maybe.
― Sara R-C, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)