for you, wonks and wingnuts.
― how's life, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:45 (eleven years ago)
we can do better
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
I PREDICT A DEMOCRAT LANDSLIDE IN THE MIDTERMS THIS YEAR
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
yeah, actually, I'm having second thoughts about seeing "started by how's life" every time this gets bumped. but get to it, you guys. It's almost february
― how's life, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
meanwhile Chris Christie is fucked.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
Admitting privileges laws probably going to the Supreme Court; I'm not hopeful about a good ruling.
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
thanks how's life, the 2013 thread had the worst fucking thread title on ILX, this is much better
― marcos, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:00 (eleven years ago)
^^^^^
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
wait what happened to Christie?
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
Bridge-ghazi
― how's life, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
“Is it wrong that I am smiling?” Mr. Wildstein texted Ms. Kelly.
“No,” she texted back.
“I feel badly about the kids,” he texted.
“They are the children of Buono voters,” she said, referring to Mr. Christie’s Democratic opponent, Barbara Buono, who was trailing consistently in the polls and lost by a wide margin.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/nyregion/christie-aide-tied-to-bridge-lane-closings.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics®ion=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
traffic thing seems like small potatoes...? but I dunno anything about New Jersey really
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
neither does Alfred obv
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
so imagine you live...in or near...a city with a bridge...and somebody...say, the governor...made that bridge uncrossable by people who needed to use it to get to work...and did so as a gesture of political retribution...and there was a paper trail that said "this was revenge, he fucked over his own constituents to get revenge on his political enemies"
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:11 (eleven years ago)
You don't know New Jersey.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:12 (eleven years ago)
you really don't have to know new jersey to know that this is a really, really bad look for anybody with any national aspirations
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:13 (eleven years ago)
Sure it doesn't look good, but Christie just has to blame his appointees for getting carried away and the mainstream media that loves him will probably let it slide. Not sure how he's toast because of this:
“Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” Kelly wrote in an Aug. 13 email to David Wildstein, one of Christie’s appointees to the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey.“Got it,” Wildstein replied.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:16 (eleven years ago)
Sure, he can look aggrieved and fire the aides, as he no doubt will.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:17 (eleven years ago)
he's fucked
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:18 (eleven years ago)
CONTRARIAN TAKE: this is no big deal but will be cause for his own party to abandon him.
not like he really had much of a shot anyway
― goole, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:20 (eleven years ago)
Wrong, this is a big deal
But yes he didn't have much of a shot
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:22 (eleven years ago)
lol #1 boss fan new jersey governor chris christie
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
people will look back on this as the thing that killed christies chances but really he never had a chance
Pierce sez not so fast:
Moreover, Christie only has problems in this regard if you believe that the Republican base is ready for the kind of open revolt that got turned off pretty quickly in 2012. I still see grumbling and bitching and the eventual falling in line, especially if the Democrats nominate the Hildebeast, of whom the base has been having porn-vampire nocturnal visitations since 1991.
As for the bridge thing, Steve's correct that it likely will be dismissed out in the country as the kind of kick-the-liberals-in-the-balls maneuver that the base loves. It might shake up the independents a little -- Do you want vengeful, petty Big Chicken with his hands on the IRS? -- but they're largely a phantom constituency no matter how softly they are stroked by their favorite pundits. I suspect falls will be taken at lower echelons, and that nobody will be talking about the bridge closing by December of 2015. The only reason to believe Christie's doomed at this point is if you believe that a genuine Goldwaterish uprising is still possible in the Republican party. I don't.
The 'open revolt' lasted through March 2012 iirc.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Wednesday, January 8, 2014 12:20 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
imo its a big deal and he had no shot, if thats possible, but yeah there were a lot of powerful people who were just tolerating him who will take this opportunity to jump ship
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
like if he had a shot this would complicate things bigtime
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
so what you're saying is he had no shot
― i like HOOS but this took the cake off my table (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
Hildebeast
I don't like Hillary but ugh
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
its just way too easy too see christie as petty corrupt jersey asshole
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
i dont think he had a shot xp
he was just never gonna be a fit culturally w the republican party, all that pallin around w the obungler didnt help either
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:30 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah what the fuck
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
wow so shocking seeing these gendered insults coming from the true blue holier than tho left who wouldve thought, next thing you know morbs will get up to it
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
Pierece is usually p. cool
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
its almost like extremely self righteous people feel like no one deserves their resepct
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
lol pierce is vv proud of himself 85/7
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
yeah he does talk about drinking a lot
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:37 (eleven years ago)
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent bridge?"
― goole, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
I'm an ILM regular who rarely posts here. But as a resident of Livingston, NJ, I will add my two cents. Wildstein was our former mayor. He is insane, and bad bad news.
Until this morning I was sure Wildstein did this on his own.. I couldn't imagine Christie to do something that reckless and mean. Now it's clear his people were involved. Christie will get rid of that aide and say he knew nothing about it. Which makes him look weak, but that's better than looking like a psycho who shuts down bridge lanes for petty retribution over an election he won in a landslide. Can you imagine if an ambulance got stuck in traffic and someone died as a result?
If it turns out he ordered it or knew, all bets are off. Anything could happen. It's gonna be interesting, that's fer sure
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
yeah if theres proof christie gave the order hes DONE
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:48 (eleven years ago)
could easily get rolled up in the cover up too
but i dont think there needs to be proof of his direct involvement for this to hurt him a lot, it just all fits together w his persona too well
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
next thing you know morbs will get up to it
you'd never know I wasn't part of the large "I love American Hustle cuz breasts" ILX caucus
next thing you know u gabbnebs will be talking about GOP PREZ 2016, huh? bcz Obama asshole
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:51 (eleven years ago)
I don't see how people can think this is no big deal. Christie's entire brand is that he's a straight shooter who tells it like it is. If it turns out he's been lying about his involvement, that is destroyed forever. Then what is he?
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:51 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I thought you were leaving, boy you're a big fat liar, aren't you, sweet puppy?
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
Also, you're not making any sense, I think it's naptime
loving cool breasts isnt sexist morbs, and youre gay so its really like not a fair comparison, also you have a history of directing gendered insults towards hillary is what i was specifically refering to
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
I still see grumbling and bitching and the eventual falling in line, especially if the Democrats nominate the Hildebeast, of whom the base has been having porn-vampire nocturnal visitations since 1991.
i know a lot of ppl love pierce's work and he usually seems OTM to me but god i hate this kind of writing.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
you can either pull that kinda shit or write seriously it's kinda either/or ain't it? fuckin', people.
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:04 (eleven years ago)
ya i hate that gonzo ott style where youre blowing everyones minds w how fucked up things are via super vivid metaphor see also matt taibbi
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
yeah, i kinda hate taibbi's writing too. HST has a lot to answer for.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:17 (eleven years ago)
for sure
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
Yes. taIbbi is unreadable. It's like every sentence is screaming "I'm this generation's HST."
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
h8 hst too
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:50 (eleven years ago)
h8st
― i like HOOS but this took the cake off my table (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
HST wrote some great stuff up until the mid 70s or so. Then it gets rough.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:16 (eleven years ago)
did like this bit from Pierce's post today about Robert Gates:
I guarantee you, back in the 1860's, Woodward would have been the go-to stenographer for all those incompetent generals who Lincoln fired. (George McClellan would have loved him.) In the 1950's, Woodward would have been MacArthur's first phone call after Harry Truman canned his ass.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
all the presidents men 2
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
haha Pierce reading Alfred's posts there or what
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
Who gives a shit about Bob Woodward
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:33 (eleven years ago)
his mother.
― i like HOOS but this took the cake off my table (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:40 (eleven years ago)
pierce
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:45 (eleven years ago)
from what i've read of civil war era journalism it was actually a lot closer to online comments trolling than it was to bob woodward
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
FreeRepublic.txt @FreeRepublicTXT 17sChristie attended more than 100 Bruce Springstein concerts. Does this “man” belong in any position or power, responsibility or leadership?
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
case closed
― Ornate Coleman (Moodles), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
fantastic
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
from what i've read of civil war era journalism it was actually a lot closer to online comments trolling
Bob Dylan's Chronicles goes into this in detail. Those guys got nasty.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:26 (eleven years ago)
Washington Post conservative columnist Kathleen Parker on income inequality:
Some of the factors contributing to the income gap are, indeed, tough to tackle, and Obama is not, in fact, a god, as he now seems comfortable conceding. These factors include the loss of jobs for low-skilled workers and the apparent inability of this population, for whatever reasons, to become more skilled. (Perhaps legalizing marijuana will help. If it doesn’t provide enough jobs, at least more people will care less.)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kathleen-parker-inequality-of-language-muddies-debate/2014/01/07/d69eef34-77dc-11e3-b1c5-739e63e9c9a7_story.html
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:31 (eleven years ago)
jesus fucking christ the sanctimony
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:32 (eleven years ago)
the poors and their love of marijuana, why don't they just learn how to manage a stock portfolio already
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:33 (eleven years ago)
Stoners = Moochers
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
"apparent inability of this population, for whatever reasons, to become more skilled"
lol @ a newspaper columnist talking about "skills"
― Euler, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
Definitely not a good look for Christie. But I don't think it will sink him, unless someone can definitively place his fingerprints on this. He needs to fire this Kelly person ASAP though.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
Obama is not, in fact, a god, as he now seems comfortable conceding
lol they won't drop this line of criticism will they -- both columnists and Morbs.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
When has Obama ever conceded that he is not a god? Therefore, he still thinks of himself as one.
http://www.bubblews.com/assets/images/news/2093540861_1378700504.gif
― brownie, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 20:55 (eleven years ago)
(Perhaps legalizing marijuana will help. If it doesn’t provide enough jobs, at least more people will care less.)
otm!
― Mordy , Wednesday, 8 January 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
i still believe in my lord and savior black hussein obungler
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:44 (eleven years ago)
btw christie lied, old lady died http://www.northjersey.com/fortlee/GWB_lane_closures_delayed_EMS_response_in_Fort_Lee.html
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:45 (eleven years ago)
apparently he's claiming he was duped by a staff member
― Ornate Coleman (Moodles), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
Not a peep from The Corner!
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
― Ornate Coleman (Moodles), Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:46 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
damn what happened to his elite bullshit detector
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:51 (eleven years ago)
please can someone else make the obvious joke about this.
i have been so prim and upstanding these long months about the fat jokes about this guy.
― goole, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:59 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/QP6CvRZ.jpg
― Hungry4Ass, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 23:06 (eleven years ago)
Weeping statue of liberty has never failed me.
― brownie, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 23:22 (eleven years ago)
Tina Dupuy @TinaDupuy 40s"What I've seen today for the first time is unacceptable." -Chris Christie.
lol
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 23:32 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfJvxuPPVNc
― brownie, Thursday, 9 January 2014 00:32 (eleven years ago)
Fort Lee woman died as GWB closures delayed medical help, report says.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:34 (eleven years ago)
collateral damage
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:49 (eleven years ago)
forget whether Christie is the second coming of Dubya. this shit is straight outta Nixon's playbook.
that said, and given just how shit some of the state- and county-level NJ Democratic leaders are, i doubt that they regret supporting Christie even after this.
― spread to fuck the fruit (Eisbaer), Thursday, 9 January 2014 02:13 (eleven years ago)
Rick Wilson @TheRickWilson 22mThey like safe bets. They like winners. They hate scandal. And they really, really hate surprises.
Rick Wilson @TheRickWilson 22mChristie's performance in this in next 48 is rather impt in the secret megadonor primary. They viewed him as being free of scandal.
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 04:17 (eleven years ago)
ah yes the megadonor primary.. the real election
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:12 (eleven years ago)
This Christie thing will be dismissed outside of NY because most people outside NY think that's how politicians in NY do stuff. See also: Chicago.
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:13 (eleven years ago)
also lol "free of scandal"
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:14 (eleven years ago)
this is definitely one of the funniest sentences I've seen in awhile
― chinavision!, Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:15 (eleven years ago)
lol super sister souljah http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/christie-needs-to-go-super-sister-souljah-on-bridge-scandal-20140109
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:31 (eleven years ago)
hahaha
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:34 (eleven years ago)
drudge went all in on christie creme yesterday
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 14:37 (eleven years ago)
most people outside NY think that's how politicians in NY do stuff.
along with thinking NJ is part of NY
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 January 2014 15:42 (eleven years ago)
Hi! You're back, Bubbles!
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 9 January 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
Eliana Johnson ✔ @elianayjohnsonRT @JeffreyGoldberg: This WAS a traffic study. They were studying what happens to traffic when you close a bunch of lanes.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:39 (eleven years ago)
John Nolte @NolteNCCountry would be much better off if our media was as tough, demanding on Obama as they are Christie. If only to force this kind of action
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:40 (eleven years ago)
boy this press conference ain't helping
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:42 (eleven years ago)
lotta rob ford jokes coming from the right and left now
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:48 (eleven years ago)
they fat lol
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:53 (eleven years ago)
'MISTAKES WERE MADE'!
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 16:57 (eleven years ago)
Amy Davidson @tnyCloseRead 1mChristie asking us to imagine how he felt "standing in my bedroom, with my iPad" reading Bridgegate e-mails.
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:16 (eleven years ago)
haha this guy just cant stop lying
it's worked for him so far
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
true
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:22 (eleven years ago)
lol this guy is such a scumbag
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
Perhaps not the smartest thing ever to invite us to imagine him standing in his bedroom with an iPad in his hands...
― Le passé, non seulement n'est pas fugace, il reste sur place (Michael White), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
wait this thing is still on?!
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
Press conference was at 11 est? 4 days of traffic shutdowns and Christie knew nothing?
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:45 (eleven years ago)
http://brucemctague.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Schulz-I-know-nothing.jpg
― German Disco Songsmith (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
HE IS STILL TALKING
it's fuckin awesome really. the right-wing twitter spin is "THIS is how you do an apology press conference. answer EVERYBODY'S questions. no 'no further questions.' just answer until there are none"
the underrated a spin is "wow this dude loves to hear himself talk"
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
Sam Stein ✔ @samsteinhpHalperin and Heilman's next book: "Lane Change"
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
lol @ "traffic study"
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
aero i hate to quibble but afaic can tell the right-wing twitter spin on this is BENGHAZI
― goole, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
er extra can tell there
FreeRepublic.txt @FreeRepublicTXT 3mThis afternoon, Christie will announce, "I am a Gay American."
- and all will be forgiven.
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:05 (eleven years ago)
just when you think they can't surprise you by finding the most hateful spin imaginable
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
idgi
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
in a way tho i can see conservatives' point about this and benghazi, both christie and al qaeda are really into revenge
― goole, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, January 9, 2014 6:08 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think the 'joke' is "haha he will come out as gay and then it will all be good bcz you can't dislike gay people in obama's america"
― i like HOOS but this took the cake off my table (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:15 (eleven years ago)
my memory is failing -- that refers to someone in particular
― goole, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:17 (eleven years ago)
mcgreevey
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:25 (eleven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdjokkACMAA-_om.jpg
did Christie dip his face in carbolic acid
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:28 (eleven years ago)
yes
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:29 (eleven years ago)
powerful conservative images
― the late great, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
the fun thing now is watching all the tales of further petty retributions leak out
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:38 (eleven years ago)
yeah imagine how badly they'd fuck over someone who was in charge of a place where they actually needed votes to win
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:51 (eleven years ago)
Gov McGreevey rather sleazily used coming out of the closet as a way to smother questions about favors for his boytoy (and skip outta Trenton).
but that scandal wasn't as fun bcz he was a thin Democrat
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
well he just resigned so no one cared to follow up
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
Also no one died
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
his problem is that the right wing of the republican party is against him and he won't get the nomination, right? am i wrong to suspect he would own in a presidential campaign though?
― flopson, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:14 (eleven years ago)
the right wing of the republican party was against john mccain and mitt romney
― iatee, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
he won't get the nomination because he's an asshole and comes off like one not because of his politics or this scandal
― iatee, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
who's gonna get the nomination though
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
I have no idea, but I expect the nominating process to be hilarious sad and scary (ie just like last time only moreso)
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:24 (eleven years ago)
feel like it's gotta be a governor, no remaining party satraps in Congress that even want it afaict, and Rand Paul or Cruz will never make it
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
paul ryan has a good shot imho
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:33 (eleven years ago)
Ryan/Palin ticket
*masturbates*
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:34 (eleven years ago)
god why are you not permabanned
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
that would be blasphemy!
oh, you were talking to waterface, nvrmind
― SHAUN (DJP), Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
― lag∞n
agree w/ this, dude is positioning for sure
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
the party loves him too, they totally lost their shit over him at the convention
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
plus those sad sad eyes, who can resist
gop loves guns and w/ paul ryan the gunshow is always in town
― balls, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)
hey, you ladies get your tickets?
― goole, Thursday, 9 January 2014 19:59 (eleven years ago)
Josh Barro:
How did Christie not know? There were 117 days between when the Bridgegate story broke and when the governor learned that one of his Deputy Chiefs of Staff, Bridget Kelly, had called for the lane closures. One of his close confidants whom he just selected to run the New Jersey Republican Party, Bill Stepien, is also implicated. Despite the fact that increasing national attention was being paid to this story through the fall, Christie — who has a background as an aggressive prosecutor! — had no idea some of his closest allies were involved. Why was he so oblivious? Christie has been reduced to insisting that his staff has been out to control and lying to him about what they're doing. That's not an ideal talking point to have to lean on.
Why would Christie's appointees have thought this was a good idea? Politicians survive scandals of staff misbehavior all the time. But in this instance, the misbehavior was conducted on Christie's behalf, in order to execute a political strategy to benefit the governor. How did Christie create a culture in which his appointees in his administration and at the Port Authority would get together and assume this was something the governor would want them to do?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
It begins:
KJL: What was your impression of Christie’s press conference?
HEWITT: That was one of the most fascinating, indeed riveting two hours in recent American political history. The comparisons to Nixon’s Checkers speech will arrive soon, and of course already have arrived vis-a-vis President Obama’s standard duck-cover-filibuster pressers. Authentic, transparent, unscripted and sincere. Very powerful.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 20:49 (eleven years ago)
lol yes the "Authentic, transparent, unscripted and sincere" Checkers speech
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 20:59 (eleven years ago)
yeah christie didnt even use a teleprompter. white house or bust.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:00 (eleven years ago)
wait, the checkers speech was good? i thought it was considered despicable and self pitying, but i wasn't there... xpost
― Hunt3r, Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:02 (eleven years ago)
hewitt is amazing
― goole, Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
"Nixon's speech was seen or heard by about 60 million Americans, including the largest television audience to that time, and led to an outpouring of public support. A huge majority of the millions of telegrams and phone calls received by the RNC and other political offices supported Nixon. He was retained on the ticket, which then swept to victory weeks later in November 1952. The Checkers speech was an early example of a politician using television to appeal directly to the electorate, but has since sometimes been mocked or denigrated. Checkers speech has come more generally to mean any emotional speech by a politician."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkers_speech
― o. nate, Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
the Checkers speech was "good" in the sense that it rescued Nixon's political career
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:06 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh163n1lJ4M
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:07 (eleven years ago)
and he managed to trick Ike into releasing HIS tax records, which resulted in Ike thinking Nixon was an untrustworthy louse
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:08 (eleven years ago)
Ike was a little slow on the uptake there
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
man I don't know how Nixon comes off to people who didn't grow up on that shit but it's just SO fucking riveting to me, watching him in all his pathology
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:15 (eleven years ago)
yep, easily the president with the most entertainment value, dude is just endlessly fascinating
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:16 (eleven years ago)
yeah -- nixon is so deeply messed up and conflicted and sad and weird that he makes most of the nuts who came after him look downright boring by comparison. even oliver stone couldn't find very much interesting stuff going in in bush's head.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:23 (eleven years ago)
"in" Bush's head
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:24 (eleven years ago)
with Nixon it's the self-pity, cold command, meanness, blubbering, inability to imagine life in anything but in campaign mode, and genuine intelligence that fascinate me, which is why no movie's ever nailed him.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:26 (eleven years ago)
reese witherspoon in 'election' comes closest.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:28 (eleven years ago)
thx now hearing Nixon saying "Fuck me Mr. McAllister"
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:31 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qRZvlZZ0DY
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:33 (eleven years ago)
^^ lousy fucking actor
delivered as if he's just noticed an old friend from Japan
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:34 (eleven years ago)
Tracy Flick: You might think it upset me that Paul Metzler had decided to run against me, but nothing could be further from the truth. He was no competition for me, it was like apples and oranges. I had to work a little harder, that's all. You see, I believe in the voters. They understand that elections aren't just popularity contests. They know this country was built by people just like me who work very hard and don't have everything handed to them on a silver spoon. Not like some rich kids who everybody likes because their fathers own Metzler Cement and give them trucks on their 16th birthday and throw them big parties all the time. No, they don't ever have to work for anything. They think they can just, all of a sudden, one day out of the blue, waltz right in with no qualifications whatsoever and try to take away what other people have worked for VERY, VERY hard for their entire lives! No, didn't bother me at all!
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:35 (eleven years ago)
^^ unmistakable from a Nixon-written caption about the California governor's race.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 January 2014 22:36 (eleven years ago)
*indistinguishable, that is
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, January 9, 2014 5:15 PM (53 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
every time just... this guy was president?
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 January 2014 23:12 (eleven years ago)
“David and I were not friends in high school,” he said. “I was class president and an athlete. I don’t know what David was doing at that time.”
lol what a total douche
http://m.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2014/01/contrite-christie-one-story-away-from-oblivion.html
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 04:33 (eleven years ago)
Christie is totally flunking gym now....
― baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 10 January 2014 07:50 (eleven years ago)
Interesting.. some of these people are keeping quiet now, but I wonder if they can be 'persuaded' to come out with their version of events during the primaries/general, if not sooner.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 10 January 2014 15:03 (eleven years ago)
Maddow promoted alt theory that traffic gate was aimed at dem senate prez seems as likely as mayor theory.
― Hunt3r, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:48 (eleven years ago)
it seems very unlikely that somethings not gonna come out show christie knew something about this before yesterday
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
even if he didnt order it its been in the news for a few months now hes got to have uncovered something before yesterday, i guess he didnt really have any other choice, but he set himself up
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 15:52 (eleven years ago)
but hey he answered reporters questions for 2 hours yesterday so he is absolved of any wrongdoing.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 10 January 2014 15:59 (eleven years ago)
Authentic, transparent, unscripted and sincere. Very powerful.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 January 2014 16:01 (eleven years ago)
very talkingmuch press confernce
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 16:02 (eleven years ago)
pizza
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Friday, 10 January 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
fat
cone on his head
this excellent if hard to watch documentary sorta catalogues how incredible it is: he'd been around for a long time. he'd already done plenty of stuff that you'd think would permanently rule him out. instead he got elected twice.
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 10 January 2014 16:38 (eleven years ago)
x-postAnd now Politico suddenly cares about Christie's past:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/15-chris-christie-controversies-you-missed-101999_Page2.html
15 Chris Christie Controversies You Missed
The GWB scandal wasn’t the governor’s first dip in hot water.
By OLIVIA NUZZI
January 09, 2014
― curmudgeon, Friday, 10 January 2014 16:38 (eleven years ago)
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, January 10, 2014 11:38 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
cool ill check that out, he is pretty magical
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 16:43 (eleven years ago)
Rachel Maddow's theory about Christie.
n 2010, Christie took the unprecedented step of refusing to reappoint a New Jersey Supreme Court justice for another term, which set off the New Jersey Democrats, who got back at Christie by shooting down all the other Supreme Court justice nominees he put forward. So when a Republican member of the New Jersey Supreme Court came up for reappointment last year, NJ Senate Democrats promised to make it a brutal fight, so Christie decided to stop the reappointment. He was furious at Senate Democrats, and held a press conference getting really angry with them. That press conference, expressing much anger with Senate Democrats, was held on August 12, 2013, a day before the Bridgegate e-mail was sent. And Fort Lee, the town that got backed up, is part of the legislative district represented by Loretta Weinberg. The leader of the Senate Democrats.
She also sez the installation of a new speaker with no history of animus towards Christie suggests he was hoping to run the clock.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 January 2014 16:50 (eleven years ago)
first time I've seen a 2-page news spread inside the NY Times with the blurb heading in the top corner "CLOSED LANES."
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
Nixon and Christie have been successful pols even tho they are/were bad liars, bcz they tell lies ppl want to hear.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 18:36 (eleven years ago)
(ditto Obama obv)
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
http://i1276.photobucket.com/albums/y462/staffpicks/Animated_GIFs/2qdy5o0.gif
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 19:22 (eleven years ago)
I'd like to imagine that was 46 minutes of fighting the urge but then giving in to the inevitable.
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Friday, 10 January 2014 19:36 (eleven years ago)
― mookieproof, Friday, 10 January 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)
hah
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 19:41 (eleven years ago)
all i know is if we fire public workers, jobs will rain down from the heavens
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
that's true. public workers like to keep all the other jobs in a little box that can only be unlocked after being fired
― Karl Malone, Friday, 10 January 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
a lockbox, if you will
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
my favorite zelda puzzle xp
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 10 January 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
really, libs deserving Perrin tweets over this penny-ante NJ shit
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
no one deserves perrin tweets; they're inhumane
― Mordy , Friday, 10 January 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
It does seem pretty silly in the scope of things, which is why I've only vaguely been paying attention (the most I learned about it came from that Maddow segment, and the worst thing from that seemed to be not renominating that judge).
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
starting to feel like we deserve a president chris traffic-jam christie for how disgusting/uncompassionate we are as a public tbh
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)
^^^ how neo cons are born
― Euler, Friday, 10 January 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
lol if you think libs are the ones reveling in this
― balls, Friday, 10 January 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
despite the growing gap between the riches and the poors, the sophisticates among us are conducting longterm stealth games that'll all work, don't worry
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
don't know why you'd say this christie is true-blue just watch his thursday press-conference he was authentic, transparent, unscripted and sincere
Authentic, transparent, unscripted and sincere. Very powerful.― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)
wait, are you serious?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 10 January 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
traffic-jam is standing up for what is best in america, sticking it to the libs, beating them at their press conference gotcha games
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
― Daniel, Esq 2, F
One of the most fascinating, indeed riveting two hours in recent American political history.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:50 (eleven years ago)
i can't even believe how insincere his tone of voice was, for two solid hours! that's impressive
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:52 (eleven years ago)
libs AND righty morons who think Christie's a 'moderate' are reveling in this, yes
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:57 (eleven years ago)
it's a union of the nation's two most robotic demos, let's sing Kumbaya
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 20:59 (eleven years ago)
― lag∞n, Friday, 10 January 2014 21:01 (eleven years ago)
j0e, yr kinda repeating yrself, just like Obama
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:07 (eleven years ago)
One of the most fascinating, indeed riveting two hours in recent American political history.― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 10, 2014
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 10, 2014
are you serious?!? i think you might be serious!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 10 January 2014 21:07 (eleven years ago)
Hugh Hewitt and I have timed our statements.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:08 (eleven years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BHuI0E2nHfM/URGdUhSSdAI/AAAAAAAApbg/TooKrt9jPTM/s1600/Chris_Christie_Corpulent_Clown.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 10 January 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
is there an echo in here
xp
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
fucking bridges, how do they work
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
this is traffic-jam's reverend wright moment, mark my word, libs
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
okay this did make me lol
― SHAUN (DJP), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:12 (eleven years ago)
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/19c500pesn4mhjpg/ku-medium.jpg
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Friday, 10 January 2014 21:26 (eleven years ago)
harsh
― lag∞n, Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:28 (eleven years ago)
lol liberal clown shops are so much more competent than conservative ones
their skills are more comparable when it comes to fixing climate change
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:37 (eleven years ago)
― lag∞n, Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:37 (eleven years ago)
is that gif from one of those awful Batman movies? i know u luv em
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:44 (eleven years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Gc87V3Urc_o/TsHcrOWYXCI/AAAAAAAAArM/Ca_bxJIB2KU/s1600/princesmilestartle.gif
― balls, Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:48 (eleven years ago)
― lag∞n, Saturday, 11 January 2014 02:57 (eleven years ago)
Did that little ball exist pre Obama?
― Vote in the ILM EOY Poll! (seandalai), Saturday, 11 January 2014 04:09 (eleven years ago)
you must have seen the movies, morbs, to think they're awful. or are you one of those people who harbours irrational hatreds of movies you've not seen?
― the "Weird Al" Yankovic of country music (stevie), Saturday, 11 January 2014 08:46 (eleven years ago)
I'd rather drink stump water than Obama water. Tell the government to stay out!
http://wvmetronews.com/2014/01/09/good-water-distribution-sites-established/
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 12 January 2014 00:19 (eleven years ago)
A NJ friend posted this on FB, saying "In Jersey, real estate development is the most frequent destination when you "follow the money.""
http://www.msnbc.com/up/watch/important-new-developments-in-bridgegate-114674243672
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 January 2014 23:18 (eleven years ago)
meaning what? i've seen this theory today (e.g., that the bridge traffic fiasco was somehow related to ft. lee being about to secure a 1b development project), but i haven't seen any reason why christie or his team would want to jeopardize it. it might make sense if christie hoped for another nj town to get the project, and he was using his office to try and influence the developers' decision. but if the pressure would simply kill the project, or cause the developers to look outside of nj to build the facilities, it would make little sense for christie to cause the traffic jams. maybe you can say christie didn't care whether the project helped or hurt nj, but normally people act in their own self-interest, and having a 1b project jolt nj's economy would be good for christie, even if it benefited a town or mayor christie didn't especially like.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 12 January 2014 23:26 (eleven years ago)
maybe Christie had some friends willing to redevelop that site if the current project was scuttled
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 January 2014 23:29 (eleven years ago)
that's certainly possible. i'm just saying that, for someone who's been understanding this scandal through a "chrisite's dirty" lens, this new scenario is hard to process (at the moment).
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 12 January 2014 23:31 (eleven years ago)
in more mundane inside the beltway news:
http://thehill.com/news/senate/195144-senate-dems-plead-with-obama-to-abandon-social-security-cut
― curmudgeon, Monday, 13 January 2014 15:08 (eleven years ago)
The December enrollment surge for the Affordable Care Act that the Obama administration long predicted -- and desperately needed -- has come to fruition.
As of Dec. 28, 2.2 million Americans have enrolled in private health coverage, according to new data released Monday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. More than 1.8 million of them signed up in December alone, a huge spike that has gotten the law closer to its original goals than most would have thought possible after HealthCare.gov's disastrous rollout in October.
The administration's original projection was 3.3 million enrollments in private health insurance by the end of 2013, so Obamacare isn't quite back on track yet. But considering the combined total in October and November was less than the administration had targeted for just the month of October, it's much closer to the mark.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
nobody gives a fuck about the Christie bridge storyhttp://www.people-press.org/2014/01/13/christie-story-attracts-little-public-interest/
The weather, however, continues to fascinate.
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 13 January 2014 21:44 (eleven years ago)
not true i give a fuck
― lag∞n, Monday, 13 January 2014 21:49 (eleven years ago)
also its prob not over
and the presidential race hasnt started yet
yeah it was also cold as fuck across 2/3ds of the entire country
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 13 January 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)
It's exciting to think that this will be linchpin issue in two years but it won't be
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 13 January 2014 21:51 (eleven years ago)
dandydonweiner, clairvoyant
― lag∞n, Monday, 13 January 2014 21:53 (eleven years ago)
it's not a very sexy story
― Mordy , Monday, 13 January 2014 22:08 (eleven years ago)
Christie is not a very sexy man.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 22:09 (eleven years ago)
I think there's more juice in the story yet, and with all the investigations being launched, I wouldn't count it out just yet. Even if it peters out now, it's been a pretty remarkable trajectory from a small item in the Bergen Record to front-page national news.
― o. nate, Monday, 13 January 2014 22:11 (eleven years ago)
I'm quite cynical of the American attention span and see no reason to change.
I don't even think Christie was or is a lockup for the nomination. I think his inner asshole-ness won't be able to stomach a national campaign.
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Monday, 13 January 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)
"American attention span" is Beltway and news corporation excuse for concentrating on trivialities like HRC's hit list and Gates' memoir.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 January 2014 22:37 (eleven years ago)
impossible it's settled that obamacare is a failure that will undo years of progressive notions about the role of gov't obamacare is a job-killing tax on the middle-class and many hard-working americans got policy cancellations and it's bad.
another outrageous claim.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 00:50 (eleven years ago)
hey America, it's the Trans-Pacific Partnership pact. Not as much fun as saying it.
http://americablog.com/2013/11/bill-moyers-trans-pacific-partnership-free-trade-agreement-death-democracy.html
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/chomsky_tpp_is_a_neoliberal_assault/
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 02:30 (eleven years ago)
There's an interesting Alexis Goldstein/Disorderly Conduct podcast about that! Courtesy A. hoos.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 02:55 (eleven years ago)
fuck the tpp btw
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:18 (eleven years ago)
The NPR interview with Gates the other morning sounded almost like it was just an infomercial for his book. He's got lots of negatives in his past and present, but none were brought up
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:24 (eleven years ago)
this is the guy who when he learned of the extra-constitutional junta the CIA and NSC had become during Poindexter's tenure said he didn't want to know LALALALALLA. Plus, uh, he worked for Bill Casey for six years.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
I also read recently that his advice to Reagan re Russia was that Gorbachev was just trying to trick us with his reform efforts and that the Soviet Union would never change at all.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:33 (eleven years ago)
that was conservative cw as recent as 1991. ppl forget how much the right went after reagan for his foreign policy (disarmament mainly, but receptiveness to gorby in general).
― balls, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:43 (eleven years ago)
George Will: "Reagan has accelerated the moral disarmament of the West by elevating wishful thinking to political philosophy." K-Ham: Reagan's changing his mind about Gorbs was "ignorant and pathetic."
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 15:54 (eleven years ago)
More inside the beltway Gates worship and generic anti-Obama criticism
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-robert-gates-waited-too-long-to-speak-out/2014/01/13/8e5b06ac-7c89-11e3-9556-4a4bf7bcbd84_story.html?hpid=z3
Of course, this is even less on the radar of most than the Christie scandal
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
Despite concerns for embassy security following the Sept. 11-12, 2012, attacks on two U.S. outposts in Benghazi, Libya, the bill provides $224 million less for embassy security, maintenance and construction costs than in fiscal 2013.
New budget bill
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 16:40 (eleven years ago)
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:24 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol this gates ethering (posting in entirety cause of {easily breeched} wsj paywall)
Bret Stephens: Robert Gates's Dereliction of 'Duty'Serving as secretary of defense isn't really a duty. It's an honor that shouldn't be treated as a burden.Jan. 13, 2014 8:02 p.m. ET
There are evangelizers who prefer the company of the heathen and prudes known to spend their nights in strip clubs—presumably to keep a watchful and warning eye on the ways of the wicked.
And then there is Robert Gates in Washington.
The former defense secretary devoted most of his adult life to climbing the structures of power in Washington, D.C. He was deputy CIA director under Ronald Reagan and CIA director under George H.W. Bush. He then served at the Pentagon for 4½ years under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama —holding the job longer than all but four of his predecessors. He was retired with a Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Now he wants you to know he was offended, irritated, enraged, scandalized, "too old for this $%*&," and just plain itching to quit nearly every day he spent at the top.
Mr. Gates offers all this in his new memoir "Duty," which hits bookstores Tuesday but already has been widely quoted for the dirt it dishes on the Obama administration.
Among other political titillations: Hillary Clinton's 2007 opposition to the Iraq surge was entirely political, a function of the pressure she was facing from Mr. Obama in the Iowa caucus. The president had no faith in his own Afghanistan strategy even as he sent 30,000 additional troops to the country to execute it. Joe Biden has been "wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades."
Also, decisions on foreign policy are made with "a total focus on politics." The Obama administration's national security staff was stuffed with arrogant micromanagers who thought they knew better than four-star commanders. "The controlling nature of the Obama White House, and its determination to take credit for every good thing that happened while giving none to the career folks in the trenches who had actually done the work" was offensive to him.
Such are the revelations in this book, at least the witting ones, and they helpfully confirm what people already know about this administration. More interesting, however, are Mr. Gates's unwitting revelations.
Take this vignette from 2010: That January, Mr. Gates called for "a highly restricted meeting of the principals to discuss the possibility of conflict with Iran with little or no advance notice." Nothing happened for a few months, until a story somehow appeared in the New York Times NYT +1.54% saying nothing was happening. Three days later, the principals met with the president in the Oval Office.
Mr. Gates describes the meeting in detail and then concludes with this nugget:
"I was put off by the way the president closed the meeting. To his very closest advisers, he said, 'For the record, and for those of you writing your memoirs, I am not making any decisions about Israel or Iran. Joe [Biden], you be my witness.' I was offended by his suspicion that any of us would ever write about such sensitive matters."
This is related without irony on page 393.
But it isn't only the president's sensitivity that angered Mr. Gates. "I was more or less continuously outraged by the parochial self-interest of all but a very few members of Congress," he writes. When Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert decided in 2007 to strike Syria's nuclear reactor and asked Mr. Bush not to disclose the existence of the reactor publicly—a request Mr. Bush honored—"I was furious." When, two years later, Benjamin Netanyahu pressed him to provide Israel with advanced military equipment to counterbalance a $60 billion arms sales to Saudi Arabia he is, again, "furious." On Libya: "I had considered resigning over the Libya issue."
He didn't, of course.
"I did not enjoy being secretary of defense," Mr. Gates writes at one point in the book. Fair enough; he could have retired after serving out the remainder of President Bush's term. He didn't. "People have no idea how much I detest this job," he quotes from an email he wrote in mid-2008, trying to scotch rumors that he would serve under the next administration. Fair enough; he could have turned down Mr. Obama's offer when it was made. He didn't. "If you want me to stay for about a year, I will do so," he told Mr. Obama after the 2008 election. Fair enough; he could have kept the promise to the letter. He didn't; he stayed on for another 29 months.
Those are choices Mr. Gates made for his own reasons. Serving as secretary of defense, after all, isn't really a duty; it's an honor and a privilege.
Honors and privileges, however, do have duties. One is: Don't treat them as a burden. Another is: Don't betray the confidence of those who bestow them on you. A third is: Resignation is honorable, but the tell-all memoir against a president still in office is not. When people wonder why Mr. Obama only seems to listen to Valerie Jarrett and other hacks, maybe it's because at least he can count on their loyalty.
Deep in the book Mr. Gates writes that "A favorite saying of mine is 'Never miss a good chance to shut up.'" His memoir is one big missed chance.
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 16:56 (eleven years ago)
lol There was an error parsing the BBcode in your post:Unknown BBcode tag: [Biden]
oops http://gawker.com/chris-christie-didnt-tell-you-about-a-meeting-with-his-1501226729
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
you sports fans can watch his State of the Stae address somewhere at 3pm, i'm sure
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
+1 on 'bridgeghazi'
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:37 (eleven years ago)
New tool to battle cockfighting introduced in House
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:41 (eleven years ago)
is it a stick
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:41 (eleven years ago)
a large purse?
― Nhex, Tuesday, 14 January 2014 19:54 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/us/politics/1-1-trillion-bill-to-avoid-federal-shutdown-covers-many-local-interests.html.1 Trillion Bill to Avoid Federal Shutdown Covers Many Local Interests
hogs at the fucking trough
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 11:58 (eleven years ago)
something something benghazi
http://www.motherjones.com/documents/1005719-senate-intelligence-committee-report-on-the
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 15:13 (eleven years ago)
x-post-- Lots of bad and good in the budget. More Headstart funding seems like a good thing to me even though I know some conservatives claim its not effective. There are lots of Republican amendments in it as well.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 15:37 (eleven years ago)
http://a5.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/image/upload/c_fill,fl_keep_iptc,g_faces,h_365,w_652/qx3n2pg2de1ou3gjb6jg.jpg
christies brother
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:39 (eleven years ago)
i wonder if christie cried after the springsteen thing last night
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:46 (eleven years ago)
what happened
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
springsteen and fallon clowned on him in a music bit
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
aw
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKHV0LLvhXM
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:55 (eleven years ago)
Fallon playing a Gibson, Bruce playing a Takamine
there is much a man can bear, but THIS
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
You're right; B.C. Riches all round!
― Who is DANKEY KANG? (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
lol aero
― goole, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
you're a strange man, aero
― Nhex, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
he is a veteran of the takamine/ovation wars
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
explains a lot
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
j/k i dont know whats goin on
Why Democratic senators opposing the Iran deal are stupid.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
Often there is cleavage within the executive branch
rowr
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:43 (eleven years ago)
not too often, though
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 January 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8c/Debbie_Downer.PNG
estremely intersting http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/01/16/obama-weighing-executive-action-on-minimum-wage
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
fuck yeah, thats my goodjobsnation & change2win crew
https://twitter.com/GoodJobsNation
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/when-federal-contractors-break-federal-labor-laws/
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
that would be amazing xp
― Mordy , Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
politics is so tedious. is chris christie the president yet?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
chris christie has always been the president
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
Here’s some welcome news. At his meeting with Democratic Senators last night, President Obama indicated that he is giving serious consideration to executive action designed to raise the minimum wage for employees of federal contractors, according to one Senator who was present.
yeah idk
― goole, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
let me repeat my old timey grumbling about the monarchial presidency whenever something about 'executive order' comes up
― goole, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
congress becoming so awful that it can't carry out any of its basic duties is a problem, but a president just walking around them doesn't make me any happier
― goole, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)
systemic dysfunction is obvs a big part of our governments problems but as long as thats the baseline im happy for good things to happen however they can
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
systems don't work so great in the private section either fwiw
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:58 (eleven years ago)
Imperial Presidency?by goole January 17 1:52Comments 4
Congress becoming so awful that it can't carry out any of its basic duties is a problem, but a president just walking around them doesn't make me any happier.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:58 (eleven years ago)
*straightens bow tie*
― goole, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:59 (eleven years ago)
shots fired lol
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 18:59 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:53 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
it wld be pretty funny if this was just another hopeless gambit by bernie sanders
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
Another Hopeless Gambit: My Life in Politics by Bernie Sanders
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 January 2014 19:17 (eleven years ago)
lol otm great senator, even if i did vote for the weed party guy instead
― lag∞n, Thursday, 16 January 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
i appreciate this alfred posting style
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 16 January 2014 19:52 (eleven years ago)
the monarchy seems concerned
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/koch-brothers-are-outspending-everyone-for-a-gop-senate-takeover-20140116
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 16 January 2014 22:20 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, I do worry about the left gradually giving into the mystique of the strongman by way of the executive-order cutting of Gordian knots. Like, oh, thank god, we have a president who does things Congress won't allow...! Less worried about legal/illegal than the psychology that that sets up.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 17 January 2014 13:54 (eleven years ago)
Dr. No is gonna retire at the end of this year due to prostate cancer.
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Friday, 17 January 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
oh well.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 17 January 2014 16:07 (eleven years ago)
Obama sheeple be having fun in the comments section here.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 17:14 (eleven years ago)
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald 18mThat's pretty RT @MotherJones "Individual freedom is the wellspring of human progress." – President Obama
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Friday, 17 January 2014 17:17 (eleven years ago)
yeah, that's bullshit. replicator technology is the wellspring of human progress
― Mordy , Friday, 17 January 2014 17:20 (eleven years ago)
iirc it's
http://media.screened.com/uploads/0/5163/378495-2001_ape_monolith_super.jpg
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Friday, 17 January 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
so this NSA curtailment jazz - is there anyone who seriously believes the feds are going to legitimately restrict their own powers in any significant way cuz I don't really buy it for a second.
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:13 (eleven years ago)
just seems like/PR damage control to me. oh sure the NSA won't maintain these records anymore, they'll let some other entity (some other gov't agency possibly? although how would that be any better than AT&T Really) maintain it and then get court orders to access what they want from their rubber-stamp top secret court, is there really any substantial difference there? either way the gov't gets yr shit - all of it - whenever they want it.
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:15 (eleven years ago)
you cld see some changes in procedure or w/e but any meaningful rollback of the surveillance state is prob unlikely in the near future or ever idk
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 18:16 (eleven years ago)
they'll let some other entity (some other gov't agency possibly? although how would that be any better than AT&T Really) maintain it and then get court orders to access what they want from their rubber-stamp top secret court, is there really any substantial difference there? either way the gov't gets yr shit - all of it - whenever they want it.
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, January 17, 2014 1:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is actually a major difference cause the whole thing is they want ALL THE DATA so that they can build network models and do all sorts of predictive softwares and whatnot, its never been about listening in on individual phone calls or w/e, theyve been able to get warrentsto do that super easily even retroactively, its about total information awareness
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 18:19 (eleven years ago)
the data is irresistible to them
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
not hard to see why tbf
there's no reason to trust anything Obama says on this issue at all. Worst presser ever.
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)
Obama: Changes in NSA Proceduresby dandydon January 17 1:52Comments 231
There's no reason to trust anything Obama says on this issue at all. Worst presser ever.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
ive seen some pressers you wouldnt believe
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
Kevin Drum has drunk some weak tea.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, January 16, 2014 3:52 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― mustread guy (schlump), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
Alfred: New Posting Styleby BIG HOOS aka the truckdriver January 16 3:52Comments 325i appreciate this alfred posting style
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
http://library.creativecow.net/articles/wilson_tim/Cinematic_Composition-DoF/assets/mirror.jpg
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Friday, January 17, 2014 9:26 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
just figured out who this refers to. bummer! i mean, A Terrible Man and all, but one of the better ones imo.
― goole, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)
aka the truckdriver
subtle lol
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 17 January 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
clue me in, fellas
― Nhex, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:35 (eleven years ago)
pawlenty? puhlease
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 17 January 2014 19:41 (eleven years ago)
Coh-burrrn
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 19:44 (eleven years ago)
please, USA, just fast-forward to the next presidency. this one is boring me now.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:54 (eleven years ago)
2nd terms are the worst
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
so INTERMINABLE
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:56 (eleven years ago)
the next one will bore you right into East Germany
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 January 2014 19:56 (eleven years ago)
not necessarily.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)
looking forward to Pres. Cruz. for the lolz.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, January 17, 2014 2:56 PM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
newsflash they dont have that anymore
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) may have more integrity than the majority of his colleagues, but it is the integrity of someone who, if he stands alone with the whole world against him, never thinks for one instant that he might possibly be wrong and the whole world might possibly be right. That brand of integrity I can do without.
― Aimless, Friday, 17 January 2014 19:59 (eleven years ago)
its cool hell prob be dead from cancer in a min
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
you don't understand, Hillary's gonna take us all BACK IN TIME to the halcyon Reagan era
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/dlFWfkh.jpg
l,r: hillary, reagan, the obungler
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
r-l
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/hilary1-e1388155970319.jpg
"i can see east germany from my house"
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, January 17, 2014 3:05 PM (24 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
smh archaic gender roles
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
I can't deny I have often marveled at the similarities between Obama and Mary Steenburgen
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
they are of the same essence
― lag∞n, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:14 (eleven years ago)
oh yeah, i didn't actually SAY coburn in my post, whoops.
sorry, Sen. Coburn, get well.
― goole, Friday, 17 January 2014 20:14 (eleven years ago)
Chris Christie
http://images.politico.com/global/2013/08/15/chris_christie_ap_328.jpg
and
http://media.tumblr.com/d52c21e81004a53416ef9733f3319800/tumblr_inline_mhayzoZLU51qz4rgp.jpg
separated at birth
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
meanwhile
Unseating Mitch McConnell in this year’s midterms will be like freeing Europe from Hitler’s Nazi control, according to Kentucky’s Democratic speaker of the House.
“It reminded me of the feeling our troops must have had when they liberated the European nations after World War II,” state representative Greg Stumbo said at an event for McConnell’s Democratic challenger, Kentucky’s secretary of state Alison Lundergan Grimes. “Can you imagine what it felt like that you were liberating a country?”
“Well, you’re about to liberate your state from the worst reign of misabuse that we’ve seen in the last 30 years,” he added.
Polls have shown McConnell and Grimes in a close race, although most give McConnell the lead.
UPDATE: 3:21 p.m. When asked about Stumbo’s comments during an interview with Lexington Herald-Leader, Grimes refused to disavow his comparison of McConnell to Nazis.
“People try to put words in my mouth all the time, so I don’t want to attempt nor would I ever try to speak for Speaker Stumbo,” she told the newspaper. “And what he meant, I’ll let you ask him directly what he meant by his comments.”
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
because Michelle and Malcolm McDowell are so much cooler?
Stumbo is a great name for a pol to be played by some lousy comic in a bad movie.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 January 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
stumbo: a cross fertilization between stumble bum and dumbo
― Aimless, Friday, 17 January 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
misabuse is not a fucking word. goddamn illiterates.
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 21:06 (eleven years ago)
surprised you didn't go for the Ted Danson in blackface joke here tbh
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 17 January 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
Some of Florida's biggest money men will attend the state's various fundraisers for Gov. Rick Scott headlined this weekend by NJ Gov. Chris Christie, with one notable exception: Brian Ballard.
"The guy, as a person, is horrific," said Ballard, a top lobbyist and finance chair of former presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
Like other Romney insiders, Ballard deeply resents Christie for the way the governor sidled up to, and gushed about, President Barack Obama in the 2012 campaign's final days just after Tropical Storm Sandy ruined parts of the Northeast's coastline.
"Charlie Crist got a lot of grief for what was called a hug of Obama. But what Christie did to Obama isn't suitable to say in a family newspaper," Ballard said. "I firmly believe he helped swing that election in Obama's favor just to help himself. I busted my ass for two years raising money and supporting Romney and this guy Christie just wiped his hands of us when we were no longer useful to him."
Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2014/01/fls-brian-ballard-top-romney-fundraiser-dumps-on-horrific-chris-christie-before-fl-visit.html#storylink=cpy
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 January 2014 22:13 (eleven years ago)
Miss Abuse is pretty pricey iIrc.
Stumbo is an excellent political name.
Don't Brecht my heart.
― Le passé, non seulement n'est pas fugace, il reste sur place (Michael White), Saturday, 18 January 2014 00:48 (eleven years ago)
would you like to apologize for that last post, Shakey?
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 18 January 2014 01:59 (eleven years ago)
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BeO2yUZCQAAcC78.png
― mookieproof, Saturday, 18 January 2014 03:36 (eleven years ago)
Wow, big surprise, the thing that's going to ruin our lives for the next thousand years landed in the "we don't care about it/we're doing a great job I guess, I like hot dogs and spaghetti" quadrant
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 18 January 2014 04:10 (eleven years ago)
Tbf, only 10% more in both axes would move it the appropriate quadrant. Sorry USA
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 18 January 2014 04:12 (eleven years ago)
"Hug of Obama"
― Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 18 January 2014 05:52 (eleven years ago)
http://gawker.com/mayor-says-christie-refused-sandy-aid-unless-she-approv-1504086470
the whole world is drip dripping on poor chris not a bully christie
― lag∞n, Saturday, 18 January 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
75% of americans satisfied with terrorism good work terrorists keep it up
― flopson, Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
after a rocky launch most people agree "terrorism is pretty good"
― lag∞n, Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, Kornacki, a self-styled NJ expert based on reporting jobs there, has been impressive the last two Saturdays. Today he spoke live almost twenty minutes, laying out the facts.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:22 (eleven years ago)
uuuh http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/wildstein-story-to-tell-immunity
― lag∞n, Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistakes_were_made
― lag∞n, Saturday, 18 January 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)
read that as christie alley.
― how's life, Saturday, 18 January 2014 20:59 (eleven years ago)
i have a feeling kornacki is going to ride this christie story as far as it will take him. seems like a more natural fit digging into this topic -- with all it's historical backstory and political intrigue -- than he is trying to inhabit chris hayes' ultra-wonk role on up. and good for kornacki, by the way.
the whole world is drip dripping on poor chris "not-a-bully" christie
that's how this is going to hurt christie. no-one's really going to care about an individual story, unless it's explosive, but after a while, he'll just have a bad-aura around him. poor president christie.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 18 January 2014 21:32 (eleven years ago)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_j-tJbLLUsAQ/SapBoAwv_pI/AAAAAAAAANM/41Zc_JzGs1s/s400/mistakes.were.made.JPG
― balls, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:16 (eleven years ago)
i'm still skeptical this will have any lasting dmg on his career. nb i never thought he could possibly win rep nom so re that it'll be a wash (tho we'll probably be blaming his inevitable early primary blowout on this scandal when it happens). ppl i've spoken to in the area who liked him before the scandal still like him.
― Mordy , Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:22 (eleven years ago)
aside from his rhetorical attacks on the tea-party and his hugging obama (which we can collectively describe as "bad-optics" for a republican presidential candidate), plus his accepting federal money, what policy-positions does christie hold that will cause him grief in the 2016 republican primaries?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)
sometimes pro-gun control
― balls, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:34 (eleven years ago)
fair point. but watch the slowly evolving flip-flop
Focus on violence control, not gun control. (Nov 2013)Vetoed outright ban on Barrett .50 caliber rifle. (Oct 2013)We already have too many firearms in our community. (Jun 2012)2009: No right-to-carry cross-state reciprocity. (Jun 2012)Favors gun control measures from law-enforcement perspective. (Jun 2012)
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:36 (eleven years ago)
http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1312/rino-christie-2016-rino-politics-government-politics-1387756756.jpg
― balls, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:37 (eleven years ago)
lol. governor tub-o-guts.
there's a few comments, here-and-there, that could be used against christie. but he's savvy enough to sidestep the impact from those comments. he isn't mitt romney. the biggest issue for him, i'd say, is that he's been open to immigration reform that includes a path-to-citizenship. time will tell if he can pivot successfully from those comments.
but i think this bridgegate thing could hurt him long-term. if it keeps unfolding, he'll just have a bad-aura by the time he's formally running.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:43 (eleven years ago)
i agree w mordy that he had no chance to get the nom, hes a candidate that only the media could love, like guiliani, all this bridge etc scandal will tarnish him tho imo just w no particular electoral repercussions since its his final term as governor anyway, prob never had no shot at being a senator since jersey votes dem, maybe he cld be elected to the house idk, prob just go back to lobbying
― lag∞n, Sunday, 19 January 2014 01:22 (eleven years ago)
he will be president for an unprecedented five terms.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 19 January 2014 04:58 (eleven years ago)
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/senate-2014-a-coin-flip/
Lots of guessing until November
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/19dg1w6vh0rc5png/ku-xlarge.png
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:31 (eleven years ago)
the single greatest cover in the history of magazines
― second set all dead boys covers (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lrogsnEuI01qmsec0o1_500.gif
― Evil Juice Box Man (Moodles), Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
― second set all dead boys covers (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:34 PM (18 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i know, the soul of the guy who did ali as st sebastian just petitioned to have himself damned to hell as lazy
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)
i'm gonna animate the hell out of that when i get home, but unfortunately the internet will have already moved on to other ridiculous things
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
also everybody pretend i found and posted the photoshop of planet hillary as the wrecking ball with miley cyrus on it only it's bieber's mugshot on her shoulders. miley cyrus's shoulders.
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:40 (eleven years ago)
disappointed bieber-on-hilaryball was not wearing the ralph lauren olympic outfit
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:51 (eleven years ago)
shit, dude, where were you
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
it's already 2pm eastern, the internet has already been won for the day i'm sorry.
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
WTF that magazine
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
its rare all the pieces land in your lap like today, RIP me
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:11 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/GOPTeens/status/425331836852518913
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
hey GOPTeens your elephant has a huge case of blue balls
( https://si0.twimg.com/profile_background_images/378800000081542877/04d3b978376fdf65af0f8cc700bf6191.jpeg )
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:24 (eleven years ago)
phat or wack?
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/time_paulryan_20111205_04021.jpg
― Evil Juice Box Man (Moodles), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
gopteens is a joke account fwiw sry
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:27 (eleven years ago)
aw shucks
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:27 (eleven years ago)
this changes nothing
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:27 (eleven years ago)
teach the controversy
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
Take it to the gay thread.
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Thursday, 23 January 2014 19:30 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/ejiCZkx.png
interesting
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:10 (eleven years ago)
no shit? good for rick perry
― Mordy , Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:14 (eleven years ago)
hes planning on running again too is my understanding
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:15 (eleven years ago)
seems like less to this story than meets the eye
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/Gov-Rick-Perry-for-decriminalization-of-pot-5168667.php
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:16 (eleven years ago)
obv nationally legalizing this is just a matter of time. maybe within the decade even?
― Mordy , Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:17 (eleven years ago)
what do u mean, goole? he said he supports decriminalizing pot -- isn't that the entire story?
― Mordy , Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
reading the quotes from perry himself and his spokesperson, there is no policy change at all here, nor any proposed, but talking about drug courts that are already in existence. all that's news is that he used the word 'decriminalization' in public.
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
its more like he's against mandatory jail time (instead they go to "drug courts") which is pretty different from decriminalization imo
also Perry is a moron and an opportunist, don't expect anything from him
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
if reforming drug laws now represents an opportunity within the republican party well then hot damn! *fires off six shooter*
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:31 (eleven years ago)
yeah i've always said that the end of the drug war (if not mass incarceration, tho i'm less optimistic there) will come from the right. fine with me!
― goole, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:33 (eleven years ago)
would be great if this started in Texas!
― Evil Juice Box Man (Moodles), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
feel like it maybe already started in colorado and washington
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
true....
― Evil Juice Box Man (Moodles), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
pass it on guys. . .
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
*inhales*
― you are kind, I am (waterface), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
not to mention california in 1996 (!)
― Mordy , Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
i'd be p (s)toked if it continued in tx tho
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
if conservative states start stepping out its once and for all proof of libertarian ascendancy within the gop
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:45 (eleven years ago)
which i guess ill take it
― lag∞n, Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
we can all dream
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 23 January 2014 22:37 (eleven years ago)
"I've got my #SOTU remarks in one hand and 2-month old Brynn in another. It really doesn't get much better than this!" the chair of the House Republican Conference wrote in caption.
I see the GOP is going to run with this 'I know you are but what am I' response to the war on women meme
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 24 January 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
screw it, let's just get rid of marriage altogether
http://www.news9.com/story/24543033/lawmakers-consider-preventing-all-marriage-in-oklahoma
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 25 January 2014 14:53 (eleven years ago)
good idea
― puple prijan (lag∞n), Saturday, 25 January 2014 15:45 (eleven years ago)
drive marriage underground that way kids will want to do it sexy sexy marriage
― puple prijan (lag∞n), Saturday, 25 January 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
Oklahoma lawmakers have never heard of cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
― Aimless, Saturday, 25 January 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
OKLAHOMA OTM
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 26 January 2014 09:02 (eleven years ago)
oklahoma's also the state that allowed a christian memorial to be built on gov property, prompting satanists to submit plans for their own satan-related memorial
― reddening, Sunday, 26 January 2014 12:11 (eleven years ago)
oklahoma is a cool state basically it has a panhandle
― lag∞n, Sunday, 26 January 2014 14:42 (eleven years ago)
Tulsa is a really great town they have shockingly good pizza there
― second set all dead boys covers (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 26 January 2014 15:04 (eleven years ago)
i visited tulsa once
― lag∞n, Sunday, 26 January 2014 15:05 (eleven years ago)
Theyre also real afraid of creeping sharia law in Oklahoma too
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 26 January 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
to be fair, that's an especially serious concern in oklahoma.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 26 January 2014 17:33 (eleven years ago)
those fuckers stole the sonics also
― balls, Sunday, 26 January 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/koch-brothers-2014-elections-102555.html
The billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch are convening some of the country’s richest Republican donors on Sunday at a resort near Palm Springs, Calif., to raise millions of dollars for efforts to shape the political landscape for years to come.
....
The Koch network raised an astounding $400 million in the run-up to 2012, spending much of it assailing President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats. After the Election Day letdown, the Kochs did an in-depth analysis to find out what went wrong and what they could do better. Among the areas identified for improvement were greater investments in grassroots organizing, better use of voter data and more effective appeals to young and Hispanic voters, according to sources.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/koch-brothers-2014-elections-102555.html#ixzz2rX6wzvJd
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:07 (eleven years ago)
better use of voter data and more effective appeals to young and Hispanic voters
Hmmmm, what are they come up with for this. Well, Reagan fooled lots of young folks back in the day
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:11 (eleven years ago)
me gusta tax cuts!
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
In the world of the Koch brothers, "more effective appeal" usually translates as "better leverages fear and ignorance".
― Aimless, Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
no me gusta big government! me gusta el market libre!
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
http://reagan.eureka.edu/images/lead_applied/Reagan_Robe.jpg
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 26 January 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
Koch Brothers will have to counter this:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Income inequality is out, “ladders of opportunity” is in.Eager to dispel claims that President Barack Obama is engaging in “class warfare” as he heads into his State of the Union address next week, the White House is de-emphasizing phrases focusing on economic disparity and turning instead to messages about creating paths of opportunity for the poor and middle class.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 27 January 2014 16:22 (eleven years ago)
Sounds like a smart move. I think "income inequality" is kind of a clunker as a rallying cry.
― o. nate, Monday, 27 January 2014 16:25 (eleven years ago)
too easy for the cancervatives to pillory 'income inequality' as demanding "anti-american" 'equality of outcome'
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 January 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
so conservatives are upset Obama hinted at more executive action
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 January 2014 16:32 (eleven years ago)
Exactly. Too easy to caricature. If you're against "income inequality" you must be for "income equality" in which case cue Soviet Russia.
― o. nate, Monday, 27 January 2014 16:38 (eleven years ago)
reminds me of the bit in that recent new yorker profile where it mentions that obama has been asking rich people for advice on how to speak about income inequality without making rich people mad. guess someone made a suggestion that he liked!
― Karl Malone, Monday, 27 January 2014 16:42 (eleven years ago)
he had a seance with FDR, who advised him to "welcome their hatred." O left in a snit, didn't even tip the medium.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
FDR was enough of a politician to know that, when he welcomed the hatred of the rich, that hatred was not politically potent enough to challenge his position or reverse his policies. At the moment the rich have a sufficient base of power that Obama is required to respect their feelings if he wants to get anything done. I wish that weren't true, but right now I can imagine the rich saying to OWS and other progressives, "we welcome your hatred", because their wholly-owned media can parley street demonstrations into reinforcing their propaganda about "liberals" and "the loss of morality and work ethic that once made this country great".
― Aimless, Monday, 27 January 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
also, they are Obama's base
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:04 (eleven years ago)
http://deathandtaxesmag.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/FDR.jpeg
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
^what's with all the light bulbs?
― brownie, Monday, 27 January 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
Not just Obama's base, but the base of ~90% of Congress. They have done their work well.
― Aimless, Monday, 27 January 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
filled with pink champagne
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
and the base of anyone else who needs to raise the billion dollars that purchases the presidency.
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
(2 billion?)
what's with all the light bulbs?
Flash bulbs from cameras, would be my guess.
― Humorist (horse) (誤訳侮辱), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
FDR ate light bulbs. they gave him strength
― second set all dead boys covers (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 27 January 2014 18:23 (eleven years ago)
truly, the greatest generation
― Nhex, Monday, 27 January 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
Josh Marshall on the origins of plutocratic insecurity:
It is that mix of insecurity, a sense of the brittleness of one's hold on wealth, power, privileges, combined with the reality of great wealth and power, that breeds a mix of aggressiveness and perceived embattlement.
Third, there is the simple fact of Obama himself. By various criteria you could argue that before Obama America hadn't had a progressive president in decades. Popular perceptions aside, Carter was actually part of the privatizing trend of the late 70s. And Clinton, while genuinely a progressive in many ways, served most of his presidency during a period when basically everyone was either getting rich or making at least some progress. And when everybody is getting at least some taste of the good times, these sorts of antagonisms find a way of getting overlooked or passed over. President Obama is far from being a Franklin Roosevelt or Harry Truman. But he is a progressive and sees the economy and the larger society's claims on the very wealthy differently than a Bush or a Reagan. And again, that was just not something any of these folks had experienced before.
But again, the answer is the confluence of these events, no one of them. It's worth remembering that Bill Clinton pushed through a reasonably substantial tax hike on upper income earners in 1993. President Obama meanwhile largely maintained the tax policies of George W. Bush, the guy who had in essence repealed Clinton's tax increase. These are all facts that are hard to ignore.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 January 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
Obama is a progressive? Only in DC, folks....
― Iago Galdston, Monday, 27 January 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)
well, he's black, so...
― SHAUN (DJP), Monday, 27 January 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/herman-cain-smile.gif
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Monday, 27 January 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
http://a.fod4.com/misc/Prince%20Zoom%20Cool.gif
― Iago Galdston, Monday, 27 January 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
shit! sorry....how the hell do you post a gif?
― Iago Galdston, Monday, 27 January 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
just put img tags around the link you just posted (click "Show Formatting Help" below, just beneath the "submit post" button)
― Karl Malone, Monday, 27 January 2014 20:32 (eleven years ago)
― Iago Galdston, Monday, 27 January 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
Thanks, Karl!
cancervatism is losing the farm vote. that's alright. farmers are a bunch of RINOs anyways
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/01/how-republicans-lost-the-farm/283349/
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 January 2014 21:08 (eleven years ago)
wow that would appear to be an act of journalism
― j., Monday, 27 January 2014 23:04 (eleven years ago)
Will see...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/28/us/politics/farm-bill-compromise-will-reduce-spending-and-change-programs.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140128
The House is expected to vote on the measure on Wednesday. It is unclear when the Senate will take up the legislation. Many Senate Democrats are likely to be unhappy with the food stamps measure, which cuts roughly twice as much as senators approved in May. Yet the food stamp cuts may not be large enough to appease House conservatives, who in June helped defeat a bill backed by Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio that would have cut $20 billion from the program. The House eventually passed a bill covering only nutrition programs that would have sliced nearly $40 billion from food stamps.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-to-raise-minimum-wage-for-government-contract-workers/2014/01/27/f7994b34-87cd-11e3-916e-e01534b1e132_story.html
President Obama will announce in the State of the Union address Tuesday that he will use his executive power to increase the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour for workers on new government contracts, fulfilling a top demand by liberal lawmakers and groups, according to a White House document.
chea
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
getting this done has been the DC wing of the Fight for 15/Fast Food/Low Wage Worker campaign, and today they get to say they won.
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:34 (eleven years ago)
this is pure Stalinism
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:34 (eleven years ago)
kinda exciting to see policy change in an actual SOTU speech
― Mordy , Tuesday, 28 January 2014 16:36 (eleven years ago)
The dictator ruthlessly taking away something that Congress should be doing, or maybe not.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 28 January 2014 17:03 (eleven years ago)
a $10.10 minimum wage is worse than hitler
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
comrade obama we thank you
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
minimum wage $20.20 by the year 3030
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
deltron zero son
― Nhex, Tuesday, 28 January 2014 17:57 (eleven years ago)
living in a post-apocalyptic world, morbid, abhorrent, abolish minimum and abortion. now we just boarded, no mistakes galt, it's our taxes we must cut spending
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
*clap*
― Nhex, Tuesday, 28 January 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
what rep is going to interrupt the potus and call him a liar this year
maybe ted cruz will decide to filibuster the sotu
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 28 January 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
anyone else watching this?
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:15 (eleven years ago)
I cut my toenails and am ready to go!
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:16 (eleven years ago)
I'm watching! He wasted no time cheering about all the good things and then immediate scolding republicans.
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:20 (eleven years ago)
i like it. he's always been so good at giving speeches.
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:21 (eleven years ago)
Wondering if he can sustain that direct approach across an hour or so
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:21 (eleven years ago)
Ooh Boehner just glowered
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:23 (eleven years ago)
that was lovely when he acknowledged boehner
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:25 (eleven years ago)
this is the most boring speech he's ever given
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:26 (eleven years ago)
He's going to tell a million anecdotes about working Americans
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:43 (eleven years ago)
What in the fuck is in front of Boehner
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:46 (eleven years ago)
weird how some folks stayed in their seats at the line about women earning less than men... i mean even if you think it's a crock or something or you hate women... it's not a good look.
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:47 (eleven years ago)
equal pay for equal work / mad men reference /prince.gif <3 i like it
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:47 (eleven years ago)
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries),
Barack Obama
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:48 (eleven years ago)
i think it's a doctrine among college republications and those who listen to them that this stuff about women earning less is disproven by whatever set of facts they cite in that other reality where they live
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:48 (eleven years ago)
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:48 PM (24 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
that's true but in the immediate situation it's like, "stand up, idiot, you can hash this out later."
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:49 (eleven years ago)
What's Ruth Buzzi doing there?
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:49 (eleven years ago)
he's advocating a minimum wage higher than the wage offered by the supposedly heroic minneapolis pizza dudes
kind of undermines pizza dudes
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:50 (eleven years ago)
Zing
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:57 (eleven years ago)
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfHXI27CIAA8CIj.jpg
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 02:59 (eleven years ago)
wait did he just say he's not going to drone bomb other countries anymore?
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:06 (eleven years ago)
no he won't send troops into countries he's targeted for drone destruction
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:06 (eleven years ago)
oh well that goes without saying obv
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:07 (eleven years ago)
standing ovation for israel
Xpost Nah, he said he'd "limit" it. It's going to be a really strict limit. I bet each and every murder is going to have to be personally approved by Obama in a secret meeting, starting NOW
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:08 (eleven years ago)
ugh, why even bother bringing it up then.
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:09 (eleven years ago)
if you're going to mention drones in sotu u need to either be stopping them entirely, or dramatically ramping them up imho
good point about jfk and reagan
― the late great, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:10 (eleven years ago)
yay i spent my night wisely again
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:17 (eleven years ago)
how old was he?
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:19 (eleven years ago)
David Brooks just said that education can't be fixed if we don't address children's impulse control.
Wtf?!?!?!
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:29 (eleven years ago)
david brooks somewhat otm
― the late great, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:29 (eleven years ago)
he means "children's impulses to smoke pot and grow up to be David Brooks"
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:29 (eleven years ago)
sometimes i wonder if david brooks has ever left bethesda
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:31 (eleven years ago)
Wow, this republican response is quite chipper! My wife remarked that she has the vocal cadence of a kindergarten teacher.
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:35 (eleven years ago)
this reminds me of this ad that plays on daytime cable news with joan lunden inviting viewers to go to the website A Place For Mom to get information about caregivers for seniors
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:39 (eleven years ago)
who is that delivering the gop response? wait, is that . . .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfHTyE7CQAAWMg3.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:40 (eleven years ago)
@― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), your wife is OTM. She's got "spunk" like Lou Grant used to say about MTM eons ago.
― Wiggywoo, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:40 (eleven years ago)
http://www.theonion.com/articles/dad-delivers-state-of-the-union-rebuttal-directly,35093/
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:53 (eleven years ago)
haha that picture
one for the lbj piners: http://www.theonion.com/articles/obama-throws-small-business-owner-into-seat-tells,35091/
― i want to say one word to you, just one word:buzzfeed (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:56 (eleven years ago)
when/where's the tea party butt?
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 03:56 (eleven years ago)
he just finished
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:01 (eleven years ago)
he was literally a butt
it was really great to see the EPA administrator applaud Obama's doubling down on the All of the Above energy approach with continued emphasis on natural gas.
i'm really proud of her for that courageous applause
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:09 (eleven years ago)
she is a hero
when the history books about how the tide finally turned against climate change are written, gina mccarthy will be on the cover, applauding about the All of the Above energy approach
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:10 (eleven years ago)
this history book will be written when miami is an underwater reef.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:12 (eleven years ago)
btw, just a week ago, the leaders of the notoriously courageous Big Green environmental groups sent Obama a letter begging him to rethink the idiotic All of the Above energy approach championed by Frank Luntz and George Bush:
We believe that continued reliance on an “all of the above” energy strategy would be fundamentally at odds with your goal of cutting carbon pollution and would undermine our nation’s capacity to respond to the threat of climate disruption... an “all of the above” approach that places virtually no limits on whether, when, where or how fossil fuels are extracted ignores the impacts of carbon-intense fuels and is wrong for America’s future...An “all of the above” strategy is a compromise that future generations can’t afford.
... an “all of the above” approach that places virtually no limits on whether, when, where or how fossil fuels are extracted ignores the impacts of carbon-intense fuels and is wrong for America’s future
...An “all of the above” strategy is a compromise that future generations can’t afford.
but whatever, go ahead gina mccarthy, clap. somehow you're in a position of power, and that depends on nodding at whatever the president says
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:15 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lh7LBtrBq1g
― Mordy , Wednesday, 29 January 2014 04:38 (eleven years ago)
Chuck Todd thought that Republican response was good. Amazing....
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 05:26 (eleven years ago)
hey mordy i'm not sure if you posted that sarcastically or what but cool thx for posting it
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 05:31 (eleven years ago)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/28/1273163/-Some-truths-about-Cathy-McMorris-Rodgers#
Her father found a small orchard to rent in Kettle Falls and Cathy stayed for a year and then chose to attend the fundamentalist Pensacola Christian College, in Florida. While Cathy attended, it was unaccredited and only became accredited in 2013.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 05:36 (eleven years ago)
Christ, that rebuttal! They're just spitballing at this point, huh?
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 05:50 (eleven years ago)
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:26 PM (28 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
chuck todd also wears fecal matter on his chin
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 05:55 (eleven years ago)
oh
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 06:28 (eleven years ago)
http://www.ny1.com/content/politics/political_news/202672/rep--grimm-threatens-ny1-reporter-following-state-of-the-union
like a boy
― the late great, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 06:58 (eleven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfHkBgTCQAEBez_.png
― pplains, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 14:32 (eleven years ago)
Who said 2013 was over.
lol punch pizza. had no idea that was happening.
― goole, Wednesday, 29 January 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
it's pretty good pizza, if you're ever in the neighborhood.
Surprised that Charles Pierce liked what he heard:
Now, I do not expect to convince my Republican friends on the merits of this law. But I know that the American people are not interested in refighting old battles. So again, if you have specific plans to cut costs, cover more people, increase choice, tell America what you'd do differently. Let's see if the numbers add up. But let's not have another 40- something votes to repeal a law that's already helping millions of Americans like Amanda.
This promise to use the powers of his office is what likely is going to raise all those hackles that were going to be raised in any case unless he got up there and abdicated in favor of Mitt Romney but, really, he couched these assertions in the mildest fashion, making of himself just a guy who was just trying to do the job to which he had been elected. He would like to have done it a different way but, darned it the regular way just didn't work, and now it's time to take out the tire iron and give the old machine a good bash. There wasn't a scintilla of anger in his voice all night. There was just a rueful tone to it, as though he had finally gotten the joke that history had played on him with the election in 2010 of the opera boufee that is our current House of Representatives.
The speech was Clintonian in three basic ways. First, and most obviously, it was long, almost 7000 words, and he delivered it very, very carefully. (John Boehner's face seemed to darken as the evening went along, like the side of a mountain that faces the sunset.) Secondly, it made a conscious, and largely successful, effort to argue policy positions from anecdote. The opening passage was a list of his administration's accomplishments folded into what appeared to be parable form:
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, my fellow Americans, today in America, a teacher spent extra time with a student who needed it and did her part to lift America's graduation rate to its highest levels in more than three decades. An entrepreneur flipped on the lights in her tech startup and did her part to add to the more than 8 million new jobs our businesses have created over the past four years. (Applause.)An entrepreneur flipped on the lights in her tech startup and did her part to add to the more than 8 million new jobs our businesses have created over the past four years. An autoworker fine-tuned some of the best, most fuel-efficient cars in the world and did his part to help America wean itself off foreign oil. A farmer prepared for the spring after the strongest five-year stretch of farm exports in our history.A rural doctor gave a young child the first prescription to treat asthma that his mother could afford. (Applause.) A man took the bus home from the graveyard shift, bone-tired but dreaming big dreams for his son. And in tight-knit communities all across America, fathers and mothers will tuck in their kids, put an arm around their spouse, remember fallen comrades and give thanks for being home from a war that after twelve long years is finally coming to an end.And all of them still live in a place called Hope.
And finally, and most important, the speech was undeniably partisan while remaining conciliatory. This is a wire-walk of which Bill Clinton was the master, and this president has learned to stay up there pretty deftly himself. For every dark caution about what he'd do if they didn't, he pitched to Congress the idea that they all ought to get together and do something because the country was getting pretty pissed at all of them. He even pitched Boehner, whose balls are buried in a Mason jar somewhere in a spot only Eric Cantor knows, and who, I suspect, would like to leave a legacy behind as Speaker that consists of something more than keeping the likes of Louie Gohmert -- and Twitter's new star bullgoose Texas loony, Randy Weber -- in four-point restraints, a lovely little lifeline while doing so.
The point is, there are millions of Americans outside Washington who are tired of stale political arguments and are moving this country forward. They believe, and I believe, that here in America, our success should depend not on accident of birth but the strength of our work ethic and the scope of our dreams. That's what drew our forebears here. It's how the daughter of a factory worker is CEO of America's largest automaker. How the son of a barkeeper is speaker of the House. How the son of a single mom can be president of the greatest nation on Earth.
He was extraordinarily strong in spots, particularly on voting rights, where he plainly had a lot to say, and said it all, and on the process of getting the country off what he rather daringly described as the "permanent war footing" it had been on since 2001. Some of the economic ideas, particularly the expansion and strengthening of the Earned Income Tax Credit, were sound and worthy of immediate action, which they won't get. I'm still a little vague on the MyRA thing, which smacked a little bit of the gimmick, and which, in any case, is just another stop-gap by which the country can forget that, once, everybody had a guaranteed pension, before the unions broke down and the sharpers on Wall Street looted what was left.
But, if this speech burned no barns, it didn't sound anything like a last chance, either. The president seemed to have a pen and one hand, and that well-worn olive branch still in the other. He is what he always has been, the coolest head in the room. You can never say he isn't that.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 January 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
whoa - did not mean to post the whole thing
Washington Post writer Robert Costa suggested in a Washington Post labeled "analysis" piece that Republican Cathy McMorris Rodgers response to Obama's State of the Union was so marvelous that she is being considered as possible Republican VP candidate. Don't know Costa's work but he must also love Sarah Palin.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:30 (eleven years ago)
if robert costa say rodgers is being talked about as a possible vp candidate that means rodgers is definitely being talked about as a possible vp candidate
― balls, Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:32 (eleven years ago)
I don't even want to link to his fluff piece that does not even acknowledge that Rodgers has doubters, haters and folks who snicker at her right-wing Christian fundamentalist kindergarden teacher schtick
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
it's almost hilarious the extent to which they keep doubling down on the war on women. they know it's a problem for them and they know it's a more solvable problem for them than their problems w/ african americans or even hispanics but despite this they can't help but lapse into some weird mansplaining dobsonian lunatic. identity politics discussions on the left can get pretty ridiculous and are generally so lacking in good faith that they can be willfully destructive towards fostering understanding or building bridges to ppl who don't already 100% think and speak the same as you but they've at least taught even yr centrist dlc types to consider for one moment how what you say might sound to someone who doesn't share yr background. the right doesn't have any kind of experience in this arena and so when they do have to reach out it's either by attempting to disregard that difference - we both hate gays, we both hate muslims, we both like money, whatever - or to shout it down. so you end up w/ even non fringe characters like huckabee or rand paul (who somehow someway believes that americans aren't aware that bill clinton got a blowjob from monica lewinsky and that the gop focusing on this in 2016 will cause women to vote against hillary).
― balls, Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:52 (eleven years ago)
curmudgeon what doubters, haters, and folx did the rodgers response get from the right? i haven't seen anything but i didn't see the actual response either, the kingmaking powers of sotu response is highly overrated imo (it's not like bob dole was some unknown).
― balls, Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:54 (eleven years ago)
everything about the sotu is overrated
― lag∞n, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:03 (eleven years ago)
unless it's a screw up like Bobby Jindal nobody remembers this crap
― Nhex, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:06 (eleven years ago)
crap gig IMO, you're forced to be whiny
http://images.politico.com/global/2013/02/05/130205_hillary_clinton_4_328_605.jpg
― balls, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:10 (eleven years ago)
war hustler, faux muscler (l-r)
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr02/2013/2/12/22/anigif_enhanced-buzz-29763-1360727652-3.gif
― pplains, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
miss the OG SOTUs
The immortal Dante tells us that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of the warm-hearted in different scales. Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
x-post -
curmudgeon what doubters, haters, and folx did the rodgers response get from the right?
It did not of course, but I just naively thought that a Washington Post article that was not on the editorial page could at least acknowledge that this Rep has some doubters
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:21 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/henry-waxman-to-retire/2014/01/30/c06485fa-892d-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html?hpid=z1
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:23 (eleven years ago)
gonna miss Waxman, dude is righteous
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:25 (eleven years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/01/30/wapo_abc_2016_poll_hillary_clinton_holds_staggering_61_point_lead_over_joe.html
― Mordy , Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:29 (eleven years ago)
yeah. nice point about those post-watergate congressional reforms in there, underrated era of legislative branch standing up to and curbing executive overreach in a manner that was actually productive and positive for democracy and government. contrast w/ this century.
― balls, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
lol, totally forgot about that pplains
― Nhex, Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:41 (eleven years ago)
Jon Meacham caught being a dumb asshole: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/The_Meacham_Theorem
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:43 (eleven years ago)
balls totally otm upthread -- the "it's almost hilarious" post.
― 330,003 Luftballons (WilliamC), Thursday, 30 January 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
so you end up w/ even non fringe characters like huckabee or rand paul (who somehow someway believes that americans aren't aware that bill clinton got a blowjob from monica lewinsky and that the gop focusing on this in 2016 will cause women to vote against hillary).
yeah the more i think abt it the more i think that whoever came up with this 'war on women' framing is a real genius. what rightist can resist a war?? (larison sit down).
i've seen a couple conservatives grousing that "the media" is lying about huckabee, that the 'uncle sugar' remark was not his position but his characterization of liberalism's position on women. they are whining that liberals are lying about huckabee lying about democrats.
huckabee was at least on the level of the broad policy aims of a party. paul's 'what about monica' stuff is just walking into the firing squad. the proposition from the center-left underpinning the contraception battle is pretty simple: reproductive health is health, sex is part of life, it should be paid for like anything else. there is a simpler and less gross conservative counterargument, but it's identical to their whole argt against HC reform: fine but it's not the state's business. but you throw the word 'war' into it and they can't help but just say 'nuh uh you are'
― goole, Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:17 (eleven years ago)
huckabee/mcmorris rodgers 2016: the war on the peen?
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
i would think it's the war on the poonani
― Nhex, Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:44 (eleven years ago)
whoever came up with this 'war on women' framing is a real genius.
the most undeniably potent political phrase since "he's racist"
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:45 (eleven years ago)
yeah nobody will ever beat that one!
― goole, Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
well, "George Bush doesn't care about black people" is a very close second
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:54 (eleven years ago)
War on PovertyWar on DrugsWar on Terror
Whoever came up with this 'war on women' framing had a bit of help coming up with the idea. But it's a damn sight better than 'Femghazi' would have been.
― Aimless, Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:54 (eleven years ago)
lol Aimless you win
I forgot how much Reps love WAR EVERYTHING
― Pale Smiley Face (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 30 January 2014 19:57 (eleven years ago)
weren't the Femghazi one of the alien races in Babylon 5
― SHAUN (DJP), Thursday, 30 January 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
BenghaziBenghazino no no it only wants to depress you
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 January 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)
Obama's issued fewer executive orders than Grover Cleveland.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 31 January 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
whoopsie daisy
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/31/former_christie_aide_at_the_heart_of_the_bridgegate_scandal_christie_knew/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, 31 January 2014 22:36 (eleven years ago)
As if anyone ever believed Christie when he said he didn't know anything about it and, heavens, he would never have ordered such a terrible thing. At best, he must have thought there was no trail of evidence leading to him, reducing it all to conflicting testimony about the content of a few conversations. It remains to be seen what sort of evidence emerges. It would be sweet if there were a recording, as with Nixon.
― Aimless, Friday, 31 January 2014 22:53 (eleven years ago)
The further comments re his former aide's high school reputation are really pathetic at this point.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 14:22 (eleven years ago)
That O'Reilly interview of Obama appeared predictable based on the NY Times take
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/03/us/politics/obama-is-tackled-by-oreilly-before-game.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140203
Obama Is Tackled by O'Reilly in Pre-Game Interview By PETER BAKER Mr. Obama was grilled about the botched rollout of the health care law and the attack on the American post in Benghazi, Libya, among other issues.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 14:25 (eleven years ago)
remember the part in Cathy McMorris Rodgers' SOTU response where she mentioned "Bette in Spokane" who was facing a $700/month increase in her premium due to obamacare?
Bette’s tale had policy wonks scratching their heads; it was hard to see, given what we know about premiums and how the health law works, how anyone could face that large a rate increase. Sure enough, when a local newspaper, The Spokesman-Review, contacted Bette Grenier, it discovered that the real story was very different from the image Ms. McMorris Rodgers conveyed. First of all, she was comparing her previous policy with one of the pricier alternatives her insurance company was offering — and she refused to look for cheaper alternatives on the Washington insurance exchange, declaring, “I wouldn’t go on that Obama website.”Even more important, all Ms. Grenier and her husband had before was a minimalist insurance plan, with a $10,000 deductible, offering very little financial protection. So yes, the new law requires that they spend more, but they would get far better coverage in return.
Even more important, all Ms. Grenier and her husband had before was a minimalist insurance plan, with a $10,000 deductible, offering very little financial protection. So yes, the new law requires that they spend more, but they would get far better coverage in return.
sigh.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 February 2014 14:49 (eleven years ago)
and she refused to look for cheaper alternatives on the Washington insurance exchange, declaring, “I wouldn’t go on that Obama website.”
Well okay then. Enjoy bankruptcy.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Monday, 3 February 2014 14:51 (eleven years ago)
i don't understand why they have so much trouble doing due diligence before mentioning anecdotes like that on national tv. it's not like there aren't plenty of real people out there who really are facing significant premium hikes (there are some notable examples on ILX).
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 February 2014 14:55 (eleven years ago)
My brain does this every time I see Benghazi
― Vinnie, Monday, 3 February 2014 15:02 (eleven years ago)
xpost
because their audience doesn't care, they just want to hear something that confirms their worldview.
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Monday, 3 February 2014 15:50 (eleven years ago)
this is 90% of all audiences though, including us
― SHAUN (DJP), Monday, 3 February 2014 16:36 (eleven years ago)
sure, also add in that the people delivering the message don't care whether it is truthful or not because they don't mind lying to their constituents and realize that anyone trying to verify their stories are already biased against their message in the first place
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Monday, 3 February 2014 19:08 (eleven years ago)
p@reene on why Christie will finish his term
http://www.salon.com/2014/02/03/chris_christies_survival_strategy_shamelessness_and_willingness_to_fight/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 February 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
Sure. Anyone vindictive enough to approve of the lane-closing scheme in the first place will certainly be shameless enough to brazenly outface the people who point out his lies and manipulations. Nothing's going to pry the truth from him or get him to resign power, except perhaps a painful arm-twisting from a source he accepts is more powerful than he is.
― Aimless, Monday, 3 February 2014 19:17 (eleven years ago)
i don't see Springsteen doing that
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 February 2014 19:18 (eleven years ago)
Ha ha
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
http://washingtonexaminer.com/the-house-gops-incredible-amazing-discovery-most-americans-arent-entrepreneurs/article/2543254
The writer of this piece about a recent House Republican retreat is a conservative btw writing for a conservative website
"Ninety percent of Americans work for someone else," Cantor said, according to a source in the room. "Most of them not only will never own their own business, for most of them that isn't their dream. Their dream is to have a good job, with an income that will allow them to support their family."
"We shouldn't miss the chance to talk to these people," Cantor continued, according to the source, "which is why we will present and pass our plans to relieve the middle class squeeze."
What was extraordinary about that portion of Cantor's presentation was not that it was out of place -- it was entirely on-target for a political party hoping to win elections in 2014 -- but that it came six years into the economic downturn, and decades into a protracted decline in middle-class standards of living. Could it actually have taken Republicans that long to realize they should address such problems, especially when Democrats have made huge gains appealing directly to middle-class voters?
Apparently, yes. And even now, not all House Republicans are entirely on board. "It's something that's been growing and taking time for members to get comfortable with," says a House GOP aide, "because they did spend the last decade talking about small business owners."
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 19:42 (eleven years ago)
we shouldn't miss a chance to talk to 90% of americans
― goole, Monday, 3 February 2014 19:47 (eleven years ago)
This is why most Americans generally pass up a chance to vote for these clowns.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 3 February 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
In presidential elections that is, but somehow they get elected in the House and could control the Senate. Apparently there are enough middle class people who want to be small business owners and therefore vote for these clowns.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 20:45 (eleven years ago)
without gerrymandering they wouldn't control the House either.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 February 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
Sunday Times op piece 2 weeks ago refuted that. tl;dr
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 February 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
Here it is.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/opinion/sunday/its-the-geography-stupid.html?smid=tw-share&_r=1&_r=0
Another possibility is that Democrats receive more votes than seats because so many of their voters reside in dense cities that Democratic candidates win with overwhelming majorities, while Republican voters are more evenly distributed across exurbs and the rural periphery. Perhaps even a nonpartisan redistricting process would still have delivered the House to the Republicans.
The problem for Democrats is that they have overwhelming majorities not only in the dense, poor urban centers, but also in isolated, far-flung college towns, historical mining areas and 19th-century manufacturing towns that are surrounded by and ultimately overwhelmed by rural Republicans.
Jowei Chen is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Michigan. Jonathan Rodden, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, is a professor of political science at Stanford University.
Hmmm. I'm usualy skeptical of rightwing Hoover Institution folks
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
http://www.poliscirumors.com/topic/huffington-post-takes-on-jowei-chen-and-jonathan-rodden
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/17/redistricting-didnt-win-republicans-the-house/?wprss=rss_ezra-klein
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 February 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
haha wait, since when does political science have a clone site of Economics Job Market Rumors? I should start an anonymous asshole board for psychologists
― Dan I., Monday, 3 February 2014 23:23 (eleven years ago)
Christie? You should have seen the file we had on him. We could have sold him by the pound to every news organization on the eastern seaboard. Maybe we're doing that. Got you wondering, don't I?
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/romney-speech-020414
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
god this is the side of Charles Pierce that drives me crazy
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
keep it in yr pants, bucko
― Fight the Powers that Be with this Powerful Les Paul! (DJP), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)
I have a screenname to uphold
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:59 (eleven years ago)
i don't understand why they have so much trouble doing due diligence before mentioning anecdotes like that on national tv. it's not like there aren't plenty of real people out there who really are facing significant premium hikes (there are some notable examples on ILX).― Karl Malone, Monday, February 3, 2014 8:55 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Karl Malone, Monday, February 3, 2014 8:55 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I suspect most people believe what they want to believe, and a big chunk of the GOP aren't very big on facts b/c who cares? their base sure doesn't. Bette in Spokane is a meme for them and will probably stay that way.
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 04:36 (eleven years ago)
there's a weird echo-chamber-within-an-echo-chamber thing with that particularly bad example. even the _subject_ of the anecdote is complicit in not wanting to grasp some basic facts.
i'm sure we'll hear from her again, recanting her story, when she has a stroke and doesn't go into bankruptcy only because she "had" to purchase a plan that covered most of her medical expenses.
― espring (amateurist), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 04:38 (eleven years ago)
wait if you put an echo chamber in an echo chamber it's the same as just 1 echo chamber assuming the first one is well designed
― the Norwegians are leaving! (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 05:03 (eleven years ago)
Not if the audio input to the inner chamber is the output of the outer chamber!
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 13:08 (eleven years ago)
CBO report proves Obamacare is a jobkiller!! Just ignore the fine print
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:28 (eleven years ago)
It would be nice if they got Obamacare fixed up so that no one ever retires
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:58 (eleven years ago)
you blowin my mind Karl! xp
― the Norwegians are leaving! (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 14:58 (eleven years ago)
But at that point you need microphones and speakers so why put the one inside of the other?
― the Norwegians are leaving! (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 15:00 (eleven years ago)
i'm not saying the echo-chamber-within-an-echo-chamber is a good or practical thing (whether in real life or with poor ol' Bette in Washington who had her doofusness exploited by higher-level doofuses), just that it's possible! ;)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 15:06 (eleven years ago)
good call. Kinda want one now though.
― the Norwegians are leaving! (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
so Clay Aiken is running for Congress
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 16:51 (eleven years ago)
if Gopher can be in the House, so can the dude who murdered "Bridge Over Troubled Waters"
― Fight the Powers that Be with this Powerful Les Paul! (DJP), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 16:53 (eleven years ago)
Elvis?
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:03 (eleven years ago)
when i was a kid i saw gopher speak about a water bill in the house
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)
his son lived in my dorm during college
― Fight the Powers that Be with this Powerful Les Paul! (DJP), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:04 (eleven years ago)
My friend who is now a gay DFL activist in MN worked in his Congressional office. Was closeted and GOP at the time.
― baked beings on toast (suzy), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:09 (eleven years ago)
suzytrump
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
yeah, I got nothin
― Fight the Powers that Be with this Powerful Les Paul! (DJP), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
House Republican leaders have given up on trying to condition a debt ceiling increase on the elimination of Obamacare's risk corridors and approval of the Keystone pipeline, three well-placed sources confirmed to TPM.GOP leaders pitched the ideas to members and failed to secure 218 votes, the sources said. Any increase will have to be bipartisan. Leadership intends to meet with members early next week to discuss the next steps.There are no specific options on the table, at this point, and it's unlikely that House Republicans can get enough votes for any conditioned debt limit hike. Democrats insist it must be raised without policy add-ons and far-right Republicans don't want to vote for any increase.
GOP leaders pitched the ideas to members and failed to secure 218 votes, the sources said. Any increase will have to be bipartisan. Leadership intends to meet with members early next week to discuss the next steps.
There are no specific options on the table, at this point, and it's unlikely that House Republicans can get enough votes for any conditioned debt limit hike. Democrats insist it must be raised without policy add-ons and far-right Republicans don't want to vote for any increase.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/house-gop-ditches-obamacare-risk-corridors-keystone-debt-limit
re: keystone, don't worry, obama will approve it anyway
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
that state department report is such a clusterfuck
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
keystone is part of the all of the above energy strategy. let's apply the policy here - does keystone have something do with energy? yes. ok so it's one of the options, let's move forward
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
What do you mean? Keystone is a great idea.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:29 (eleven years ago)
i'm using my internet expertise to detect some sarcasm in that, alfred, but it really does fit perfectly into our energy policy. as dr courage said during the SOTU,
"Now, one of the biggest factors in bringing more jobs back is our commitment to American energy. The 'all the above' energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working, and today America is closer to energy independence than we have been in decades. (Applause.)"
this 'all of the above' strategy has been heroically passed from president to president for decades. its simplicity is divine. is keystone related to energy, yes, well then let's do it. it's no more complicated than that.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
...The "all the above" energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working... ...And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did. (Cheers, applause.)...The "all the above" energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working... ...And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did. (Cheers, applause.)...The "all the above" energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working... ...And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did. (Cheers, applause.)...The "all the above" energy strategy I announced a few years ago is working... ...And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did. (Cheers, applause.)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:43 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/O3MwJTNl.jpg
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
so angry that Obama doesn't think climate change is any kind of existential threat or major crisis
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
proof he's not actually a socialist
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
it was that recent long profile of him that really disappointed me, where he was quoted saying our generation wasn't facing a similar type of crisis as WWII etc. Just, man fuck you.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
...And when our children's children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did. (Cheers, applause.)
i know our political leaders dish out total bullshit on a regular basis but i can't imagine the psychic break needed for him to say these words and bask in the applause
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
sadly I don't expect Hillary to be any better. future generations gonna look back in horror at the short-sightedness.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
yeah, no chance in hell hilary will be better. in the 2008 primaries i found her stance on climate change/energy to be worse than both edwards and obama. if somehow she sees the light and begins thinking about not being an asshole, bill will be there to make sure she triangulates
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)
not that many future gens really
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:02 (eleven years ago)
maybe the remnant populations of garbage pickers along the polar coasts will just assume that's how god made it to begin with.
― ad music for ad people (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
At least the weather for Gulf War III is gonna be exciting!
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
luckily human beings can habituate to all kinds of environments + our serotonin levels probably will even readjust to make us happy in post-wasteland earth
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:23 (eleven years ago)
readjust to make us happy in post-wasteland earth
saw a slatebait-y essay (it actually might have been in slate) arguing that the "alternative" rapa nui narrative is actually more depressing than jared diamond's. i take it that the alternative theory argues that humans had no ability to avert environmental catastrophe on rapa nui once the rats got loose and ate all the coconuts, and that ANY human presence on the island was an adaptive triumph over very severe adversity, rather than self-inflicted tragedy.
― ad music for ad people (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
the only thing i really worry about is those of us (+ our children I guess) living at the height of human productivity + wealth are really going to suffer when things go to shit bc we've become accustomed to living like kings. but like our great-grandchildren probably will not give a shit that life is hard. life has mostly always been hard for humans. we're pretty much the exceptions.
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
potable water is the new two cars in your garage
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
well thank god for israel leading the way in desalination technology
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:49 (eleven years ago)
Prime Minister, 2052 AD
http://www.themoviebanter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/600full-waterworld-screenshot.jpeg
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
this is like the 16th reference you've made on ilx to waterworld. you do realize that movie was fantasy, right, and not an accurate depiction of what the future will look like?
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:52 (eleven years ago)
clearly you've never seen El Brendel in Just Imagine, which in 1930 precisely predicted Watergate and 3D printing.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
maybe i've underrated the prophetic ambitions of kevin costner flicks
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hox2QwC-JuA/UD6zjPJpOqI/AAAAAAAAA4M/okTsdO6SUsw/s1600/sl4thepostman.jpg
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
PO may not be that big ten years from now
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:00 (eleven years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AauCarFOO_Y/TGXVeJ0qK-I/AAAAAAAAA6k/uMp5EcmPn_g/s1600/Costner-13%2BDays.jpg
closer to the truth
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:02 (eleven years ago)
christmas will be cancelled iirc
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:16 (eleven years ago)
add this to the list of movie i wish were on netflix
― the "Weird Al" Yankovic of country music (stevie), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:20 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/from-alaska-to-florida-attorneys-general-join-fight-to-end-chesapeake-bay-cleanup/2014/02/05/d88a426c-8e7f-11e3-b46a-5a3d0d2130da_story.html
Attorneys general in 21 states are backing an attempt to derail the Obama administration’s Chesapeake Bay cleanup plan, fearing that the government will use that authority to regulate wastewater in other watersheds, including the Mississippi River Basin.
State attorneys general, most of them Republicans, from as far as Alaska and Montana joined the American Farm Bureau Federation in its fight to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from carrying out its plan to clean up the nation’s largest estuary. Impaired waters have led to fish-killing dead zones and other marine life die-offs for decades.....
Although farm and industrial pollution in the Mississippi River causes an immense Gulf of Mexico dead zone that kills marine life, the EPA has said it has no interest in orchestrating a cleanup plan that states in the region haven’t requested and aren’t prepared to develop, unlike the Chesapeake Bay region.
The EPA recently challenged and lost a federal suit filed by environmental groups that called on it to end its “hands-off approach” to managing the Mississippi River and to develop a measuring stick for the level of pollution that could be allowed to enter the river.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 February 2014 14:52 (eleven years ago)
"Para Bellum" is a dumb and vaguely nasty name for any organization. but this might be the dumbest thing gawker ever published:
http://gawker.com/the-gop-just-named-its-hot-new-innovation-lab-after-a-n-1515675052
― goole, Thursday, 6 February 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
weinstein bored today
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 6 February 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, that was persnickety, even for them. Like, the gun was a Luger. Everyone knows it as a Luger.
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Thursday, 6 February 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
Thought they had given up on even trying to do this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/06/senate-hits-another-dead-end-on-unemployment-benefits/
Just four Republicans – Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Susan Collins (Maine), Dean Heller (Nev.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) – supported the new proposal. With 55 members of the Democratic caucus all in support, Reid needed just one more GOP vote to advance the bill into the formal debate. For procedural reasons, once the fate was certain, Reid voted with Republicans, making it a final 58-to-40 roll call.Even if the Senate can reach a bipartisan deal on unemployment insurance, the House GOP majority has not shown interest in passing the legislation.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 February 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
I hope they KEEP trying!!
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Thursday, 6 February 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/02/07/a-democratic-ad-that-hits-back-on-obamacare/
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 February 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
More of my "Plum-line" reading:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/02/07/can-dems-go-on-offense-over-medicaid-expansion-in-red-states/
The politics of the Medicaid expansion have taken on a kind of life of their own, separate from Obamacare overall. It has allowed red state Dems to embrace parts of the law while implicitly hitting Republicans over their ideological fixation on full repeal, which would take health coverage away from millions. These Dems don’t talk about Obamacare, obviously. But they stand up for the core goal of expanding coverage to those who lack it (as Michelle Nunn has done by calling for the expansion in Georgia), and criticize Republicans for wanting to take it away from folks (as Alison Lundergan Grimes has done in Kentucky, where the expansion is in full force).
The ability of Dems to turn out core groups like minorities and lower income women – single women and waitress moms — will be pivotal to Dem hopes to holding the Senate. As the nonpartisan analyst Jennifer Duffy has pointed out, while turnout tends to lag among these groups in midterm elections, the Medicaid expansion could help mobilize them. In this context, the coming battle over the expansion in Louisiana will be worth watching as a key tell.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 8 February 2014 16:59 (eleven years ago)
That's all quotes actually.
Yep, we're stuck trying to get votes out to support bluedog Dems in some states like Louisiana in order for Dems to maintain control of the Senate. If Grimes could win in Kentucky that would be pretty awesome
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 8 February 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/conservatives-knives-out-mitch-mcconnell
Ah Kentucky...A Democratic governor, and a battle for the senate on the right
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 8 February 2014 17:52 (eleven years ago)
add this to the list of movies i wish were on netflix
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eldqx1MChyc
― Brad C., Saturday, 8 February 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
Thanks for posting that, it's about time I finally watch it!
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 8 February 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
Gonna have to work raising my right hand and saying "I don't know boys, give me the good old days" into daily conversation.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 8 February 2014 19:16 (eleven years ago)
“Now I think that the rap against him — that he won’t enforce the law — is false,” Schumer said of Obama on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “He’s deported more people than any other president, but you could actually have the law start in 2017 without doing much violence to it.”
Schumer's offer on immigration
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_02/schumer_says_check049003.php
Needless to say, the party that controls the House and might soon control the Senate rejected the offer
― curmudgeon, Monday, 10 February 2014 16:38 (eleven years ago)
can't have anymore browns in the mix. they don't vote GOP
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 10 February 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
Go for it:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/197861-reid-again-eyes-the-rulebook
excerpt:
Labor leaders are irate the Senate could not manage to advance a modest three-month extension of unemployment benefits to a final vote this past week, even though its cost was entirely offset in a major concession to the GOP.
Civil rights leaders are not happy that Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) and Johnny Isakson (Ga.) used their procedural leverage to negotiate a deal with Obama to nominate two judges with spotty civil rights records for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have complained about Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.) blocking African-American nominees to important courts in their home states.
One major concern among liberals is that Obama would get very few of his judicial nominees confirmed next year if Democrats lose control of the Senate.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 10 February 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, has called on the Senate to eliminate the tradition of giving home-state senators sign-off authority on judicial nominees, also known as “blue slip” authority.
Blue slip authority is one of the problems
― curmudgeon, Monday, 10 February 2014 19:32 (eleven years ago)
^^ My district's rep in Congress. She's great.
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Monday, 10 February 2014 19:33 (eleven years ago)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/09/rand-paul-warns-his-former-home-state-texas-could-turn-blue/?hpt=hp_t5
Speaking Saturday night at the dinner, Paul stressed that the country’s top immigration priority should be border security but said the party needs to have a “better attitude” when talking about resolving the country’s broken immigration system.“People who are Hispanic or Latino, they have to believe that we want them in our party, so it is an attitude thing as much as it is policy,” he said.One of those messages, he said, should be: “If you want to work and you want a job and want to be part of America, we will find a place for you.”His line drew mild applause from the audience.“That was kind of tepid,” he said.
“People who are Hispanic or Latino, they have to believe that we want them in our party, so it is an attitude thing as much as it is policy,” he said.
One of those messages, he said, should be: “If you want to work and you want a job and want to be part of America, we will find a place for you.”
His line drew mild applause from the audience.
“That was kind of tepid,” he said.
― christmas candy bar (al leong), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
all my taxes live in Texas
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
oh how I hope he's right about Texas going blue
― Spaghetti Sauce Shampoo (Moodles), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
― Karl Malone, Monday, 10 February 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
“If you want to work and you want a job and want to be part of America, we will find a place for you.”
This is not the GOP's oft-repeated policy by any stretch. Their position has been that these people are, by definition, criminals every one of them, and they have no place in America, so let's deport them all and if they want to get in, let them ask us nicely for a visa like the law-abiding folks do.
― Aimless, Monday, 10 February 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
lol Schumer
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
I hope they let Schmuck make the “He’s deported more people than any other president" tribute speech to Bam at the Dem convention in '16
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
i'd like to see a highlight reel of moments like those, like John Kerry's famous "We believe we have compromised significantly, and we're prepared to compromise further" about 4 seconds before the climate bill died
― Karl Malone, Monday, 10 February 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
looks like Paul forgot that THEY TOOK ER JERBS is the platform
― Nhex, Monday, 10 February 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
Schumer and Paul both proudly parading their assholishness
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
or craven political sensibilities, whichever you prefer
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 10 February 2014 20:57 (eleven years ago)
FFS can't we give this man special dispensation -- a variance, whatever -- so he can run for POTUS?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHrMamKQmMc
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 11 February 2014 02:08 (eleven years ago)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/08/1276010/-Biggest-Democratic-PAC-Sitting-Out-the-Mid-Terms-When-it-Should-Be-All-Hands-On-Deck-in-2014?detail=hide
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 February 2014 13:52 (eleven years ago)
prefer to give age dispensation to Snowden-in-exile
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 February 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
The NYTimes sends a love letter to Wendy Davis
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/magazine/wendy-davis.html
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 13:14 (eleven years ago)
http://static01.nyt.com/images/2014/02/16/magazine/16davis2/mag-16davis-t_CA0-blog427.jpg
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 13:15 (eleven years ago)
The NY Times clarifications and detail on subjects that were presented in a different and arguably less thorough manner by Dallas and right-wing media is not likely to help her too much; and I thought most folks agreed that even if she was perfect it would be hard for a Dem to win the governership in Texas anyway.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 15:11 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/02/11/who-voted-for-the-clean-debt-ceiling-increase/
“When you don’t have 218 votes, you have nothing,” House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Tuesday morning
Well, he didn't go Dylanesque-- When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 15:35 (eleven years ago)
issa to investigate reports of president obama standing naked during benghazi attacks
― balls, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 18:22 (eleven years ago)
barack obama is the ♦president of the united states of america♦. that is a position of authority and dignity. i'm sure he's never naked.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
if only we had gone with Romney, a guy who is def never naked
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
Or a guy.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 February 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
mitt romney is the life of every party. you don't even know.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 12 February 2014 19:56 (eleven years ago)
rand paul, once and future plagiarist
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-rand-paul-and-ken-cuccinelli-accused-of-stealing-nsa-lawsuit/2014/02/12/058675aa-942b-11e3-83b9-1f024193bb84_story.html?hpid=z6
remember, unemployment insurance makes people lazy!
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 13 February 2014 08:36 (eleven years ago)
rand paul wears a hairpiece, right? i've never seen such a bad hairpiece on someone. the eyes are drawn to it.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 February 2014 11:47 (eleven years ago)
The Clintons and their special interests running interference
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/13/us/politics/trade-dispute-centers-on-ukrainian-executive-with-ties-to-clintons.html
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 13 February 2014 13:35 (eleven years ago)
atlas rugged
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 13 February 2014 13:38 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/feb/12/christie-using-nixons-playbook/
― Mordy , Thursday, 13 February 2014 14:55 (eleven years ago)
What's good for the goose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3IWq3CXHyc
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 13 February 2014 23:07 (eleven years ago)
Friend of a friend in Charlotte today was at work and Gov. Pat McCrory came in. Guy had the opportunity to speak to McCrory face to face and said "thanks for nothing." At the end of his shift, he was informed he no longer had a job. McCrory had gone to the owner about it and the owner decided to fire him. Not a good look for an unpopular governor, imo, but the guy said it was worth it.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 February 2014 00:54 (eleven years ago)
fucking unbelievable that the UAW went down ~unopposed~ in TN
good analysis here
http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/after_uaw_defeat_at_volkswagen_in_tennessee_theories_abound
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 17 February 2014 03:52 (eleven years ago)
I was misled into clicking on a link to f0xn4tion.com and this is what I saw there.
http://i58.tinypic.com/2425so5.png
REALLY? Is that STILL the big talking point?
― StanM, Monday, 17 February 2014 15:09 (eleven years ago)
Unless it comes out that she was there and personally shot Chris Stevens, nobody gives a shit.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 February 2014 15:23 (eleven years ago)
The Republicans prepare their reception for HRC's campaign:
This woman presided over the debacle in Behnghazi. She's the Queen of Refuse. So bow down to her if you want, bow to her. Bow to the Queen of Slime, the Queen of Filth, the Queen of Putrescence. Boo. Boo. Rubbish. Filth. Slime. Muck. Boo. Boo. Boo.
― Aimless, Monday, 17 February 2014 18:36 (eleven years ago)
this is getting kinda hot, keep going GOP
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 17 February 2014 18:40 (eleven years ago)
http://cdn.ksk.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/QUEEN-OF-THE-HARPIES.jpg
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Monday, 17 February 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
hillary abandoned her true love bill in the fire swamp
― Mordy , Monday, 17 February 2014 18:42 (eleven years ago)
lol at phil d, i almost went there
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 17 February 2014 18:43 (eleven years ago)
wondering which gop clown will make the most entertaining general election opponent for hrc. tough choice. normally i'd say ted cruz, but the remote possibility that he gets elected president makes me wince. who isn't boring here, since you're all so convinced chris christie isn't the presumptive gop nominee?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 00:25 (eleven years ago)
rand paul? ugh.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 00:26 (eleven years ago)
Rob Ford's ineligible, so Christie would have been the next best thing in terms of bluster. I haven't been following closely enough to have a sense of whether he's finished or not.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 00:28 (eleven years ago)
Rob Ford's ineligible
saddest statement ever written.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 01:25 (eleven years ago)
I haven't been following closely enough to have a sense of whether he's finished or not.
It makes me think the story has less value in public opinion than it ordinarily would by simple virtue of msnbc going wall-to-wall about it every single day. Used to love Rachel Maddow, but can't even watch her show now that it's all she talks about.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 01:37 (eleven years ago)
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/02/after-chattanooga/
http://prospect.org/article/when-culture-eclipses-class
These UAW losing the union vote in Tennessee articles are sad if not surprising. Still need to read the In These Times one upthread.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:07 (eleven years ago)
http://www.ballot-access.org/2014/02/for-first-time-in-history-democrats-wont-run-anyone-for-u-s-senate-in-alabama/
Alabama holds an election for U.S. Senate in 2014. Republican Senator Jeff Sessions is running for re-election. For the first time in Alabama history, the Democrats are not running anyone for U.S. Senate. Here is a list of Democrats running in the June 2014 primary for federal and state office.
There are no Democrats running for U.S. House in the 4th and 5th districts. For the 140 state legislative races, no Democrats are running in 57 races.
Because of Alabama’s severe ballot access laws, it is likely that no minor party or independent candidate will be on the ballot for U.S. Senate or any other statewide race in Alabama either.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
are there districts in the northeast in which a Democrat runs unopposed?
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
Good question. I think the Republicans usually get someone to run, but I am not sure.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:20 (eleven years ago)
Meanwhile in the US Senate, Reid did not change enough procedural rules--
judicial confirmations remain at a standstill. Just one judge has been confirmed so far in 2014, and this judge was a holdover from the November 2013 fight that led to Democrats invoking the so-called “nuclear option.” Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) began the process necessary to confirm four judges on Wednesday night, but this process will still take days to complete and will only confirm a small fraction of the 32 judicial nominees awaiting votes. Even after the transformative changes last year brought to the Senate’s rules, the Senate still isn’t working. Routine confirmations are not moving forward
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/13/3273391/senate-nuclear-option/
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:21 (eleven years ago)
good. eliminate the filibuster and bring congressional republicans up on sedition charges
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:31 (eleven years ago)
Still need to read the In These Times one upthread.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:07 PM (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
best take on it imo, mike's been hanging out in Tenn for the better part of the fall & winter--better reporting groundwork for his analysis than any of the other stuff i've read
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:43 (eleven years ago)
Was driving through northern Alabama two weeks ago and there was a big billboard I passed on the interstate for a NO UWA group that said "Because Alabama is for Winners, not Losers!"
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 16:05 (eleven years ago)
oh lawd
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 16:11 (eleven years ago)
Because Alabama is for Winners, not Losershttp://www.lionheart-designs.com/inventory/beltbuckles/Confederate%20States%20and%20Civil%20War/Confederate%20States%20Flag%20Alabama%20Belt%20Buckle2.JPG
― joygoat, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
Republicans trying to behave on some issues to help themselves in November:
Democrats acknowledge that the Republican retreat on the debt issue was politically wise and represents yet another factor in the mounting concerns over their own Senate prospects. Democrats are counting on bursts of political extremism to wound Republican candidates. The move by Mr. McConnell, of Kentucky, and Mr. Cornyn, of Texas, showed that at least some Republicans have learned from past defeats.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/18/us/politics/behind-debt-limit-retreat-a-gop-eye-on-retaking-the-senate.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 19:45 (eleven years ago)
Congress Is About to Shower More Tax Breaks on Corporations After Telling the Unemployed to Drop Dead
http://www.ctj.org/taxjusticedigest/archive/2014/02/congress_is_about_to_shower_mo.php#.UwTLoUJdXR4
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 15:25 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/scott-walker-eyeing-2016-faces-fallout-from-investigations-as-ex-aides-e-mails-are-released/2014/02/18/8b26bfa4-98b2-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html?hpid=z2
Can both Walker and Christie be brought down?
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 18:38 (eleven years ago)
that issue is not going to take Walker down
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 19:05 (eleven years ago)
Awww man.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
The best hope would be that the 'independent political groups' that Walker coordinated with are smacked with revisions to their tax status and hefty fines on top of that. But knocking Walker off his perch is more than one can reasonably hope for, given the arcane nature of the misdeeds.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 20:23 (eleven years ago)
Ok. Just read this take:
Like some of the antics of Chris Christie’s staff, what these disclosure lack in actionable criminal violations they certainly supply as an indication of clumsiness and arrogance.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_02/scott_walker_and_campaigning_o049133.php#disqus_thread
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
I like how Kilgore brings up communications processes in the 80s and early 90s before those staffs even used email. The problem--and Kilgore knows this, too--is that today staffers CC members of the team indiscriminately and to assume that Walker was de facto signing off on everything because he was CC'd doesn't pass the laugh test. It also didn't convince the prosecutor either, who probably didn't assume that Walker knew a private router was being used. None of Walker's staff, who were leaned on hard by prosecutors, has rolled over in the face of all this.
Not really sure why it's arrogance for a person who hasn't been charged with anything (in the face of a dire lack of evidence) to act indignant. Clumsy? Kilgore made that up.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 21:52 (eleven years ago)
Unless those 20,000 emails uncover something obviously criminal then this is going to be a total waste of time and, as others have noted, are only going to make Walker seem like a martyr to his supporters.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 19 February 2014 21:53 (eleven years ago)
So better late than never I guess, Obama has dropped the chained cpi Social Security tax cut idea from his economic plan. Thank you Republicans
― curmudgeon, Friday, 21 February 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
good
― Nhex, Friday, 21 February 2014 16:19 (eleven years ago)
But then there's this Obama compromise--
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/what-was-harriet-miers-unavailable-or.html
President Barack Obama has now infuriated abortion rights advocates, civil rights leaders and Democratic lawmakers in his push to confirm a Georgia judicial nominee they argue is too socially conservative.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 21 February 2014 16:29 (eleven years ago)
Robert Costa @costareports -- Romney backyard appearance w/ Christie is another sign to GOP estab that CC is still part of their club, still a '16 contender...
NOMINATION: LOCKED UP.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 22 February 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
Finally, Dingell makes the right decision.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Monday, 24 February 2014 14:47 (eleven years ago)
Why is Dingell retiring the right decision, Dandy Don?
― curmudgeon, Monday, 24 February 2014 14:52 (eleven years ago)
Because he's 88?
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 24 February 2014 17:01 (eleven years ago)
because he's a tax-and-spend enemy of individual freedom and us hegemony.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 24 February 2014 17:04 (eleven years ago)
anyone seen his birth certificate?
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 24 February 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
he's an old-style liberal and you may have noticed they're not making new ones
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 February 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
sure we are, in secret. we've been working on these bloodlines for generations. some thought that barack obama was "the one," but now we see that the chosen-one will emerge in the next generation.
http://www.quickmeme.com/img/a5/a50120f3b4f953634a06963310ff24b9e7d8036dca25c0401f1808fc154d5c01.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 24 February 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
http://0-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/a/image/1373/06/1373067537557.jpg
american liberalism
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 24 February 2014 17:33 (eleven years ago)
making a comeback, in a future generation.
gonna be so sweet.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 24 February 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
Because he's too old and he's been there too long. His politics aside, he's part of the problem.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Monday, 24 February 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
Here's another problem, a Kafkaesque one that started in the Bush Administration and continued on through the current one
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2014/02/no-fly-coverup/
After seven years of litigation, two trips to a federal appeals court and $3.8 million worth of lawyer time, the public has finally learned why a wheelchair-bound Stanford University scholar was cuffed, detained and denied a flight from San Francisco to Hawaii: FBI human error.
FBI agent Kevin Kelley was investigating Muslims in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2004 when he checked the wrong box on a terrorism form, erroneously placing Rahinah Ibrahim on the no-fly list.
What happened next was the real shame. Instead of admitting to the error, high-ranking President Barack Obama administration officials spent years covering it up. Attorney General Eric Holder, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and a litany of other government officials claimed repeatedly that disclosing the reason Ibrahim was detained, or even acknowledging that she’d been placed on a watch list, would cause serious damage to the U.S. national security. Again and again they asserted the so-called “state secrets privilege” to block the 48-year-old woman’s lawsuit, which sought only to clear her name.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 24 February 2014 19:17 (eleven years ago)
in fairness, "we are ridiculously incompetent at our jobs" does undermine national security somewhat
― sent as gassed to onto rt dominance (DJP), Monday, 24 February 2014 19:24 (eleven years ago)
is obama still high-ranking? i thought we were all pretty "meh" by now.
― flying under the radar because i'm bad (Hunt3r), Monday, 24 February 2014 19:27 (eleven years ago)
the so-called “state secrets privilege” is so easily abused that it is 100% guaranteed that it will be abused, over and over again, whenever it is convenient to do so.
― Aimless, Monday, 24 February 2014 19:30 (eleven years ago)
OTM x100 it IS abused over and over again.
A good friend of mine has a common name and was accidentally put on the no-fly list and spent 4 years and thousands in legal fees to get removed. Like that guy in the article, it was simply human error and nothing more.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Monday, 24 February 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
blah blah blah Dick Cheney blah blah blah
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/cheney_obama_prefers_food_stamps_to_military
Cheney noted that "friends" he's worked with in the Middle East no longer trust the United States and lamented that budget considerations were taking a toll on the prestige of the American military.
“[Obama would] much rather spend the money on food stamps than he would on a strong military or support for our troops,” he said.
But as Think Progress pointed out, Cheney's line of attack actually disparaged the troops too -- over 900,000 veterans currently depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
Lets guess who Cheney's friends in the middle east are: Netanyahu, Assad, perhaps the military regime in charge of Egypt?
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
haha yes in 2014 when approx half of congress doesn't "believe" in empirical science and that it's only socialisms if you're black and poor, Dingell is the problem
― condo associations are people my friend (will), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
dingell was one of the larger forces repeatedly blocking gun control in the house for decades so let's not shed too many tears
― balls, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
Ok, but I'm not buying Don's term limits or ageist arguments; and I am not clear what is "the problem" that he says Dingell is a part of. There's obviously lots of problems on Capitol Hill, and if he's pushing a Democrats and Republicans are equally responsible argument, I don't buy that either.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 18:16 (eleven years ago)
i guess the taxed enough already crowd has outlived their usefulness for now
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/senators-hit-rivals-hard-and-fast-gop-primaries
curious what their next acronym/excuse-for-getting-used-by the GOP will be. maybe the LUAU party? libertarians united against uppities?
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 25 February 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
Netanyahu, Assad, perhaps the military regime in charge of Egypt?
tbf, Cheney is on a backslapping basis with the royal family of Saudi Arabia.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 19:14 (eleven years ago)
Look who's gonna run for John Dingell's seat.
Debbie Dingell is an experienced Democratic strategist who currently serves as chair of the Wayne State University Board of Governors. John Dingell has praised her as his closest confidant.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 21:13 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/25/debbie-dingell-to-run-for-house-seat-being-vacated-by-john-dingell/
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 February 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
Jan Brewer vetoes the Arizona bill.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 27 February 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
Rush L. says Brewer is just giving in to bullies, with the veto
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 27 February 2014 15:43 (eleven years ago)
Probably need to introduce an anti-bullying amendment. Oh, wait...
― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 27 February 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
http://thefederalist.com/2014/02/26/washington-republicans-shouldnt-fall-for-keynesianism-lite/
OK, so I understand what you're against (although its not supported very well), but what are you for in regards to getting the unemployed working.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 27 February 2014 15:45 (eleven years ago)
thanks grandpa
https://twitter.com/HHSGov/status/438709462094708736
― joe perry has been dead for years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 February 2014 21:24 (eleven years ago)
(comment addressed to HHS twitter, not anybody here, we are all young and beautiful)
― joe perry has been dead for years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 February 2014 21:25 (eleven years ago)
new important gif
https://31.media.tumblr.com/ea0deff2a634c1f5503d88d4af298ba1/tumblr_n1tt09ZODh1qavqqoo1_250.gif
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 3 March 2014 00:12 (eleven years ago)
so many potential uses!
hey mr president several hundred people got arrested this morning to try to draw attention to the keystone xl pipeline that you're probably going to approve, do you have a comment
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 March 2014 00:15 (eleven years ago)
http://crookedtimber.org/2014/03/03/if-you-want-to-be-truly-pessimistic-about-the-ukraine-crisiss-geopolitical-consequences/
Among other arguments, Ukraine situation will also encourage some that we should be doing more fracking so Europe can get energy from US and not Russia
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 March 2014 16:06 (eleven years ago)
was this posted yet?
http://pando.com/2014/02/24/everything-you-know-about-ukraine-is-wrong/
― Mordy , Tuesday, 4 March 2014 16:07 (eleven years ago)
shout out to crooked timber linsk
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 4 March 2014 16:46 (eleven years ago)
No surprise that Washington Post's Dana Millbank is crying that Obama won't support in his latest budget using chained cpi to cut middle class "entitlement"; and no surprise that he won't mention raising the cap as an alternative. W. Post editorial page editor Fred Hyatt wrote a similar item. They always use the word "serious" when they describe their ideas to cut benefits
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-president-obama-releases-a-budget-without-vision/2014/03/04/a217a01e-a3e5-11e3-84d4-e59b1709222c_story.html
Yet Obama’s budget confirmed his irrelevance by retreating from any serious attempt at reforming entitlement programs. Those programs are swelling and will grow exponentially in coming years, crowding out everything else government does, including defense spending and social programs.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
if only those programs could crowd out the washington post somehow (hi kaplan!)
― blot it out (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:25 (eleven years ago)
They always use the word "serious" when they describe their ideas to cut benefits
Raising the cap on the amount of income subject to social security tax is much too "serious" a reform to be contemplated in the corporate media. Cutting benefits has just the right amount of seriousness.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:28 (eleven years ago)
exactly
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
Any "serious" discussion about the deficit involves slashing defense, which no politician in this fucking country would ever agree to do.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
The US has treaty obligations to militarily protect countries with a huge proportion of the world's GDP. This, in turn, cements the US dollar as the world's reserve currency, which in turn allows us to spend massively on our military. Making rich people worldwide fairly content with the system as it stands.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)
xp I guess we're making "progress" with all those Tea Party repubs who are all like "sure! let's cut the military and everything else!"
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 19:40 (eleven years ago)
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/senate-rejects-obamas-nominee-civil-rights
this is one of those thing that, while it was in process, i heard about only from following conservative media. could be my error, but did anyone care?
― goole, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
I liked Pierce's response: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/senate-rejects-debo-adegbile-nomination-030514
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 20:32 (eleven years ago)
No one did seem to care about it until the vote.
I didn't know Justice Roberts once did pro-bono work (let alone pro-bono for a mass murder criminal defendent)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 21:55 (eleven years ago)
it was just a little murder
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 21:57 (eleven years ago)
many lawyers do pro bono work; it's not uncommon
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 21:59 (eleven years ago)
he did enough little guy stomping for his bona fides
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:28 (eleven years ago)
mass murderers are the 1% of the murderer world
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 March 2014 22:52 (eleven years ago)
yeah if you didn't follow conservative media that vote today came out of nowhere, york had a tweet noting the times hadn't written a single thing about it.
― balls, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:02 (eleven years ago)
it's weird how some of you bother to follow the conservative media
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:15 (eleven years ago)
echo chambers are toxic
― balls, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:16 (eleven years ago)
for the lolz, for the lolz.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:17 (eleven years ago)
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner),
not as weird as your posting conservative talking points that you retract upon confrontation
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:17 (eleven years ago)
which ones were those Alfred?
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:24 (eleven years ago)
I know you have better wit than that.
do you really want me to cut and paste greatest hits over the years?
Today you're lucky because the announcement was craven and stupid.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:26 (eleven years ago)
A greatest hits of the ones I've retracted would be great. Especially the ones I've retracted. As for my lucky day--that announcement was widely reported. And hilarious.
Actually, I've asked you why you read The Corner before.
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:31 (eleven years ago)
To acquaint myself with the origin of my parents' wretched ideas.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:34 (eleven years ago)
the reality is that over the past 15 years I've gotten more liberal and my posts probably reflect that
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:40 (eleven years ago)
posttrack.us
― 4. Nels Cline and My Uncle Eat Soup at Panera Bread (3:37) (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 March 2014 23:50 (eleven years ago)
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, March 5, 2014 5:15 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well, i learned something, didn't i!
― goole, Thursday, 6 March 2014 01:49 (eleven years ago)
given how the nom depended on vulnerable dem senators letting him squeak through, i wonder if the lack of coverage wasn't strategy...
― goole, Thursday, 6 March 2014 01:50 (eleven years ago)
the reality is that over the past 15 years I've gotten more liberal ― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, March 5, 2014
― anything but a martyr (dandydonweiner), Wednesday, March 5, 2014
socialist.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 6 March 2014 02:58 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-draws-scrutiny-over-searching-senate-panels-computers-for-interrogation-data/2014/03/05/5d93ac66-a4a4-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html
Later in the piece CIA Director Brennan denies it, but here's the lead:
The CIA searched computers intended to be used solely by the Senate Intelligence Committee in an apparent effort to determine how committee staff members gained access to a draft version of an internal agency review of its controversial interrogation program, U.S. officials said.
The action, some officials say, would mark the first time a U.S. intelligence agency has accessed congressional computers and would be an apparent violation of the constitutional principle of separation of powers.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 March 2014 13:15 (eleven years ago)
plus some actual crimes
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 March 2014 13:18 (eleven years ago)
absolute l33tness corrupts absolutely
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 March 2014 13:50 (eleven years ago)
In the NY Times story on this I see that the C.I.A. is claiming an interesting defense:
Several officials said the C.I.A. decided to search the committee’s computers at the Virginia facility based on a suspicion that committee investigators had obtained the internal review through unauthorized access to parts of the C.I.A.’s computer network. One of the laws that may possibly have been violated is the 1986 Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which prohibits government employees from gaining unauthorized access to government computers.Last month, Mr. Brennan wrote a letter to Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, about the law after the two had engaged in an exchange about it during an intelligence committee hearing. In the letter, made public on Wednesday, Mr. Brennan said that the statute “does apply” to the C.I.A., but pointed to a provision in the law that does not prohibit any “lawfully authorized investigative, protective or intelligence activity” carried out by an American spy agency
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/us/politics/cia-and-congress-at-odds-over-inquest-into-detention-policies.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140306&_r=0
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 March 2014 14:37 (eleven years ago)
lolllllll
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 6 March 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_03/paul_ryans_soul_food049372.php
what a knucklehead--
What [the Left is] offering people is a full stomach—and an empty soul. The American people want more than that.This reminds me of a story I heard from Eloise Anderson. She serves in the cabinet of my friend Governor Scott Walker. She once met a young boy from a poor family. And every day at school, he would get a free lunch from a government program. But he told Eloise he didn’t want a free lunch. He wanted his own lunch—one in a brown-paper bag just like the other kids’. He wanted one, he said, because he knew a kid with a brown-paper bag had someone who cared for him.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:42 (eleven years ago)
and that little boy, whom nobody cared for, was named...
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:44 (eleven years ago)
... Paul Ryan
and that's
the rest
of the story
GOOD DAYhttp://blog.godreports.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Harvey-Paul.jpg
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 March 2014 22:45 (eleven years ago)
empty souls, full stomachs, can't lose
― hug niceman (psychgawsple), Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:15 (eleven years ago)
let's take buses away from them too so they can enlarge their souls even more walking to school
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:23 (eleven years ago)
if there's a hell paul ryan will burn in it
― you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Thursday, 6 March 2014 23:35 (eleven years ago)
distended souls
― brownie, Friday, 7 March 2014 02:38 (eleven years ago)
you tell em JPS
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/retired-justice-john-paul-stevens-calls-for-six-new-constitutional-amendments/legal-issues/2014/03/06/84082
1. The "Anti-Commandeering Rule" (Amend the Supremacy Clause of Article VI) This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges and other public officials. in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
2. Political Gerrymandering - Districts represented by members of Congress, or by members of any state legislative body, shall be compact and composed of contiguous territory. The state shall have the burden of justifying any departures from this requirement by reference to neutral criteria such as natural, political, or historical boundaries or demographic changes. The interest in enhancing or preserving the political power of the party in control of the state government is not such a neutral criterion.
3. Campaign Finance - Neither the First Amendment nor any other provision of this Constitution shall be construed to prohibit the Congress or any state from imposing reasonable limits on the amount of money that candidates for public office, or their supporters, may spend in election campaigns.
4. Sovereign Immunity - Neither the Tenth Amendment, the Eleventh Amendment, nor any other provision of this Constitution, shall be construed to provide any state, state agency, or state officer with an immunity from liability for violating any act of Congress, or any provision of this Constitution.
5. Death Penalty- (Amend the 8th Amendment) Excessive Bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments such as the deathpenalty inflicted.
6. The Second Amendment - (Amend the 2nd Amendment) A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:10 (eleven years ago)
really like how Christie got the CPAC shaft last year for working w/ Obama to help the ppl in his state in the wake of Sandy. this year after misusing tax payer funds for political gain and his staff ordering a "traffic study" that inconveniencing thousands upon thousands of his constituents (oh yeah, and one died), he gets a top-billin speaking spot.
― condo associations are people my friend (will), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:19 (eleven years ago)
the whole perfectly epitomizes what the GOP has become in 2014
― condo associations are people my friend (will), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:23 (eleven years ago)
whole thing
― condo associations are people my friend (will), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:24 (eleven years ago)
the whole GOP is a POS
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 7 March 2014 03:51 (eleven years ago)
but they're WINNERS yo
― Nhex, Friday, 7 March 2014 04:58 (eleven years ago)
Really like how Obama hung out with Christie during Sandy and after, did nothing to help the Dem who was running against Christie and is now being dissed by Christie. Obama's bipartisanship strategy not working again
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:25 (eleven years ago)
thanks, obama.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 7 March 2014 15:58 (eleven years ago)
head of a candy-coated POS party
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 March 2014 16:06 (eleven years ago)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the head of the party
― waterbabies (waterface), Friday, 7 March 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
head of a candy-coated POS party― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 7, 2014
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, March 7, 2014
point-of-sale?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 7 March 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
Goddamn this guy is stupid.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bobby-jindal-eric-holder-sister-in-law-segregationist
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 March 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_03/schoolhouse_doors049383.php
Ralph Reed saying the same nonsense. If only the Nation of Islam would open a bunch of schools down there and start getting voucher money, would these guys change their approach on this. But now that I think about it, they'd probably just find a way to allow vouchers only for the religious schools they like.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 March 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
CPAC is always such a goldmine of lunacy.
if only the Dems had anything similar
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 March 2014 18:49 (eleven years ago)
That there's no Progressive Action Caucus points to the continued intellectual deficiency and poor organizational skills of what passes for a left in Amerikay.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 March 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
yeah that's what I was getting at. How awesome would it be if the left had their shit together enough to have an annual conference that ranking Democrats felt obligated to come to and genuflect before and say outrageously lefty things in public like "end corporate welfare" or "socialized medicine, yup let's have it" or "legalize weed"
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 March 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
netroots nation
― balls, Friday, 7 March 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
That happens in other countries. Actually it happens w other countries' versions of Republicans too.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 7 March 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
kinda heartbreaking to realize how low the chances are that any of those (entirely sensible) JPS proposals would even get close to becoming amendments. 2 and 3 in particular strike me as a prerequisite to having anything even approaching non-shitty gov't in this country.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 7 March 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)
there will never be another constitutional amendment
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 March 2014 19:05 (eleven years ago)
and like netroots nation cpac's profile is correlated to whether gop is the out party, there's no fun in a straw poll if your guy is in the white house and not facing any challenge from within the party. obv will agree that conservative grass roots is considerably more focused and effective than the american left but it helps that it's better funded and more homogenous.
― balls, Friday, 7 March 2014 19:06 (eleven years ago)
Paul Ryan anecdote is wrong/bullshit, of course, whether he knew that or not:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/03/paul-ryan-free-lunches-make-kids-soulless.html
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Friday, 7 March 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
As for the left getting their shit together, I like this Guardian interview with George Lakoff where he goes on about completely detesting the progressive mindset even if progressive morality is better.
"They don't understand their own moral system or the other guy's, they don't know what's at stake, they don't know about framing, they don't know about metaphors, they don't understand the extent to which emotion is rational, they don't understand how vital emotion is, they try to hide their emotion. They do everything wrong because they're miseducated. And they're proud of that miseducation. Oxford philosophy reigns supreme, right? Oxford philosophy is killing the world."
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Friday, 7 March 2014 19:29 (eleven years ago)
Or not understanding why people actually vote the way they do, or how they think the way they do, yet assuming that this knowledge is obvious and thus not worth investing in figuring out like the conservatives did in the 70s
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Friday, 7 March 2014 19:32 (eleven years ago)
Ronald Brownstein pithily sums up our current electoral dilemma:
Republicans can't attract enough minorities to consistently capture the White House. Democrats can't win enough whites to consistently control Congress.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/03/divided-government-isnt-going-away-anytime-soon
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 March 2014 20:24 (eleven years ago)
That... doesn't even make pithy sense.
― Nhex, Friday, 7 March 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
Obviously details still count. Republicans have a good chance of taking the Senate this year because Democrats are defending a lot of weak seats. Conversely, Democrats have a good chance of taking the Senate in 2016 because Republicans will be defending a lot of weak seats.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 March 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
Weak seats, loose stools
― Dan I., Friday, 7 March 2014 21:16 (eleven years ago)
cant lose
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 7 March 2014 21:18 (eleven years ago)
excuses, excuses. the era of radical liberalism is just about over. bring on president cruz.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 7 March 2014 21:43 (eleven years ago)
idk that makes perfect sense to me.
― goole, Saturday, 8 March 2014 00:35 (eleven years ago)
Are you takin' the pith?
― già, ya, déjà, ja, yeah, whatever... (Michael White), Saturday, 8 March 2014 00:42 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/cpac-gay-marriage-ban-liberal-lie
― balls, Saturday, 8 March 2014 08:01 (eleven years ago)
Medved is a vile toadstool, but I loved his Golden Turkey Awards book when I was a kid.
― you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Saturday, 8 March 2014 15:32 (eleven years ago)
Anderson's spokesperson tells Kessler she "misspoke" -- "Secretary Anderson was referring to a television interview which she had seen with Maurice Mazyck." So, by mistake she somehow believed the interview she saw on television was a conversation that happened with her personally, and that the boy's request for a paper bag lunch was actually a request not to get a school lunch.
― you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Saturday, 8 March 2014 16:42 (eleven years ago)
the Medveds are lousy critics too; they put Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible in that book!
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 8 March 2014 16:45 (eleven years ago)
Ha, seriously? I wonder if I still have my copy somewhere...
― you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Sunday, 9 March 2014 19:11 (eleven years ago)
The not-so-top-secret CIA
More on the Senate investigators vs CIA scandal. Wow, even Feinstein is now criticizing the CIA
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:02 (eleven years ago)
I guess this should go in another thread besides Fucking Sociopath Obama... Adolph Reed Jr.:
I think that Clintonism basically polished off the purge of the left wing of the Democratic party.... It was an utter success in that regard. But it’s the cycle though, right? So there’s nothing to do at election time except vote for the Democrat because the Republican is almost invariably going to be worse and despite the Third Party votes I’ve cast in my life, that’s no response to anything. And that speaks to another problem that’s an element of the electoralitis within the left and that’s that the same thing happens every four years. Around this time you begin to look around and see how the Democratic presidential field is shaping up. Then one strain of lefties will say, “God, Hillary Clinton? This looks terrible. We need to find a progressive candidate.” So now there’s talk about an Elizabeth Warren of the Democrats that’s supposed to an alternative to the corporatist Clinton wing, and there’s even talk of Bernie Sanders running. Well, at that point, it’s too late. You can’t build a base for a candidacy in a year or two years or even four years. The only way to get candidates worth having is to build the social force that will create candidates worth having.... It comes back to movements all the time really.
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/09/we_are_all_right_wingers_now_how_fox_news_ineffective_liberals_corporate_dems_and_gop_money_captured_everything/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
yeah, bowel movements
― waterbabies (waterface), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
You can’t build a base for a candidacy in a year or two years or even four years. great, the left is just now figuring out something the right figured out over fifty years ago
― balls, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:23 (eleven years ago)
So now there’s talk about an Elizabeth Warren of the Democrats ... you can’t build a base for a candidacy in a year or two years or even four years. The only way to get candidates worth having is to build the social force that will create candidates worth having
tbf seems to me that a lot of the energy for warren's senate bid and a great deal of the buzz around some Draft Warren thing or w/e is coming from the populist social movement-y sector of the left, though some of the same folks are already disavowing her over israel/iran positions (just learned the abbreviation 'PEP', 'progressive except palestine').
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
something the right figured out over fifty years ago
Aren't their movements always well-funded and not simply grassroots?
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:40 (eleven years ago)
I need to read the Reed essay over lunch. I've gotta admit: as a child of the seventies, I have had no loyalty to unions. They're done. The trick is organizing in a new way.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
the left hasn't figured anything out, cuz there is no left left*
*read the headline
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
I've gotta admit: as a child of the sixties, I have had no loyalty to anything.
If vinyl came back, labor can come back.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
You people had marginally better clothes.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
nice to see me and morbs agree occupy was so incompetent and ineffective it might as well have not existed. comity!
― balls, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:49 (eleven years ago)
"effective" is meaningless, the die is cast unless Scotty fixes the warp drive
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 15:57 (eleven years ago)
Feel like Obama WAS the Warren of 2008 and he beat the shit out Hillary. Unfortunately he either got co-opted during the general or never was the candidate the left made him out to be but Hillary was in this position before.. and she totally fucked it up.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
ever was the candidate the left made him out to be
ding ding
The left wasn't fooled – the Beltway was/is.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 16:16 (eleven years ago)
yup
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
hey, even white people are poor now
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/10/paul-ryan-poverty-plan-race-income-inequality
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 16:20 (eleven years ago)
I finished the Reed, Jr. article. Disappointing -- the Salon interview boasts more insights. He does come up with several on-point descriptions of our prez: "His books are not substantive articulations of a social program but performances in which his biographical narrative and identity stand in for a vaguely transformational politics" (I'd say his presidency more than his books). He comes closest to advocacy in the last graf:
The crucial tasks for a committed left in the United States now are to admit that no politically effective force exists and to begin trying to create one. This a long-term effort, and one that requires grounding in a vibrant labor movement. Labor maybe weak or in decline, but that means aiding its rebuilding ins the most serious task for the American left. Pretending some other option exists is wore than useless. There are no magical interventions, shortcuts, or technical fixes. We need to reject the fantasy that some spark will ignite the People to move as a mass. We must create a constituency for a left program -- and that cannot occur via MSNBC or blog posts or the New York Times. It requires painstaking organization and building relationships with people outside the Beltway and comfortable leftist groves....Obama and his top aides punctuated that fact by making brutally apparent during the 2008 campaign that no criticism from the left would have a place in this regime of Hope and Change. The message could not be clearer.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
i'm all for how he advocates building that mass movement by prioritizing class consciousness over other identity politics. the more snooty successful liberals grasp that poor people resent them too (not just the kochs!) the sooner an effective anti-1% coalition might form. fuck the rich, left and right!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 18:29 (eleven years ago)
The trouble is that I think people who put class consciousness first are still stuck in a vocabulary and mindset that can appear to handwave the real concerns of people who don't think of class as the most important aspect of their lives--even now you can't throw a rock on the lefty internets without hitting a well meaning elderly gentleman in a hammer and sickle sweatshirt insisting that racism and sexism exist ~because capitalism~, don't you see The Real Enemy. Engels was like "class the determinant contradiction yall" and dudes are still making that straight-ahead argument, ignoring that it doesn't speak to huge swaths of people.
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:07 (eleven years ago)
well said
― sleeve, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
idg what sector of the economy a "vibrant labor movement" is going to take root in
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:16 (eleven years ago)
if notions of class-divisions don't resonate with young progressives, what notions do resonate?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
not being snide; genuinely curious.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:19 (eleven years ago)
well, here's some new horseshit that won't cause riots on Wall Street: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/with-clock-ticking-on-mortgage-relief-homeowners-wonder-whats-ahead/2014/03/10/8482830e-a2df-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_allComments.html?ctab=all_&
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
debt relief from student loans (xp to Daniel)
― sleeve, Tuesday, 11 March 2014 20:33 (eleven years ago)
taxed-enough-already: "an oddly lefty movement, looking to push change from the outside. Why can't liberals build anything like it?"
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/11/the_tea_partys_perverse_leftist_fantasy/
because too many "liberals" with influence and money are stuck up assholes? for example: humanities professors who preach marxist theory while exploiting grad students who finish phd programs with $student loan$ up the yin yang and zero job prospects. why take egalitarianism seriously when its major american proponents are such flagrant hypocrites? at least the kochs are up front about their arrogance and greed
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 21:58 (eleven years ago)
otm
― Mordy , Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:00 (eleven years ago)
for better or worse (ok, mostly worse), class-based rhetoric doesn't resonate with most americans. like john steinbeck (supposedly) said, the problem with america is that all of its non-rich citizens see themselves as "temporarily embarrassed millionaires."
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:13 (eleven years ago)
otmfm
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:15 (eleven years ago)
It's hard to lend a hand when you are patting yourself on the back.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:18 (eleven years ago)
Really? Everyone I know - almost all lefties, granted - is more and more incensed by CEO salaries that are 500 times the average worker while the right is railing against teachers' unions etc. (xposts)
― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:21 (eleven years ago)
I'm just really disillusioned w the left these days cos I've been dealing with trust fund hippies.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:23 (eleven years ago)
http://www.versobooks.com/books/1567-utopia-or-bust
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 11 March 2014 22:45 (eleven years ago)
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:07 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
so otm. I think something very influential in my understanding of leftist politics was my best friend telling me about her mother in the 80s, who was really big in the marxist-leninist movements in the UK but when she suggested that identity politics (race, etc) might actually be important, was hounded out and received death threats. I do think a lot of identity politics is tied to class, but ignoring one for the other is extremely silly.
As far as working class Americans go, I've spent the last 4 years of my life working in pretty low conditions in the DC area and I can tell you that class consciousness or even the notion of basic labor rights (i.e. breaks!) don't exist among most people living in that condition. Anecdotal bullshit I know, but it's been eye opening.
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 06:34 (eleven years ago)
Everyone I know in my age group (50 or getting close) is aware they're not future millionaires, like the two unemployed women I talked to Sunday night, who dye their hair but get *that* too-old look instantly at job interviews.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 11:41 (eleven years ago)
(nearly all middle-class white college grads, I know)
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 11:42 (eleven years ago)
sink lost in florida, midterms looking very ugly
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 11:52 (eleven years ago)
Two-time loser!
A pretty close race, something Sink knows about.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:06 (eleven years ago)
wasn't it pretty close? and when was the last time a democrat won that district?
but still yeah i'm worried about the midterms too. the democrats have been way too snooty about defending the ACA in particular and in general standing up for the welfare of non-rich people (since Bobby Kennedy got shot)
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:10 (eleven years ago)
and Bobby was in his first year of doing so
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:12 (eleven years ago)
obama carried it in 2012 pretty easily. aca was central issue - tea party opponent attacked it, sink defended it, sink lost. don't expect to see many other dems this year make her mistake.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:18 (eleven years ago)
Sink didn't defend it though. She offered the usual Dem mealy-mouthed demurral ("It's not perfect but we can fix it").
What I found most interesting: the libertarian candidate won almost 5 percent of the vote.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:21 (eleven years ago)
sink won that district against scott four (jesus four already?) years ago too ie tea party just won a race against a candidate who won the district in a gubernatorial race in 2010, a district obama won twice easily . sink attacked jolly for wanting to privatize social security, jolly countered he only wanted to partially privatize social security now but complete privatization is something that needed to be on the table. jolly won. in florida.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:33 (eleven years ago)
w/ libertarian candidate winning 5 percent of the vote. how can the left 'become a factor again'? show up at a midterm election more than once this century would be a start.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:36 (eleven years ago)
otoh i'm actually starting to believe michelle nunn could be a pickup in ga if only cuz i'm really really starting to belive paul broun is gonna win the gop nomination. shame on me attributing any significance to ppp polling but broun is drawing all the attacks from the field which must mean they think he's in the lead. turns out 'give away free assault rifles' is a winning strategy.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 12:50 (eleven years ago)
Re Sink (D) loss in Florida special election.
about 180,000 voters (as compared to 329,000 in the district in 2012, and 266,000 in 2010) in a district with a Cook PVI of R+1 gave a Republican a victory by a margin of 1.9% (about 3500 votes), with a Libertarian winning 4%.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_03/not_a_game_changer049446.php
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 14:15 (eleven years ago)
Dem. Senatorial Campaign Comm. hitting me up for cash email:
A new PPP poll shows that $8.3 MILLION in Koch lies have erased Kay Hagan’s (D-NC) 15 point lead. She’s now tied with all eight GOP challengers in Nate Silver’s “tipping point state” -- what he calls the GOP’s “best option [for] ... a 51-49 Senate majority.”
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 15:48 (eleven years ago)
This is great:
http://grist.org/politics/want-everyone-else-to-buy-into-environmentalism-never-say-earth/
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 15:57 (eleven years ago)
Now in the case of planet — the planet will be fine. We just won’t be on it. And so this language and these images — “polar bear,” “Planet Earth,” “environment” — they signal the wrong thing to most people, which is that they’re struggling and we don’t care. We have to make the environment and climate be about them and their lives and the economy and justice and all the things that people do care about.
familiar from George Carlin's "Save us"
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:02 (eleven years ago)
Exactly
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:05 (eleven years ago)
these types of messaging studies are interesting. recently i read a study about cycling infrastructure activism that advises:
What messages aren't working (or not working on a wide scale)?Environmental protection: Not a major driver in the majority of citiesSafety: To bring up safety can backfire if it's seen as questioning the city's commitment to an essential dutyEquity: A positive impact and outcome, but not a critical issueCongestion: Not a pressing topic in many smaller or mid-sized citiesWhat messages are back-firing?If you have a "One Less Car" t-shirt, burn it. Anything anti-car, "adds fuel to a fire you don't want to stoke," Meyer said.Suggesting that bicycling is on par with other modes, like cars and transit, is simply not seen as credible.
Environmental protection: Not a major driver in the majority of citiesSafety: To bring up safety can backfire if it's seen as questioning the city's commitment to an essential dutyEquity: A positive impact and outcome, but not a critical issueCongestion: Not a pressing topic in many smaller or mid-sized cities
What messages are back-firing?
If you have a "One Less Car" t-shirt, burn it. Anything anti-car, "adds fuel to a fire you don't want to stoke," Meyer said.Suggesting that bicycling is on par with other modes, like cars and transit, is simply not seen as credible.
― this video is private (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:40 (eleven years ago)
also don't ask ppl to eat their vegetables, it's better to tell them they'll get scurvy or cancer if they don't imo.
― this video is private (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:42 (eleven years ago)
it would probably be best if we just don't talk about the environment or climate or science at all, all of those are major turnoffs
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:56 (eleven years ago)
one emerging messaging tactic is to just talk about tv shows and not mention science. this builds trust with the listener - you're not trying to hit them over the head with anything related to the environment, and that's a win-win. continue to build this trust by avoiding any mention of science or the environment but expanding discussion of tv shows.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
sorry, just being a smartass. i sympathize with these messaging studies and i'm interested in them too. shit just seems so bleak and reading yet another confirmation that most people will always stuff their fingers and go "lalalalalala" encourages my bad misanthropic habits.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:00 (eleven years ago)
yeah you read these and you go "well, probably better if humanity just gets it over with"
― (or if you must, "data") (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
^ This is why the left is so bad at messaging. A study showing that a message "works" is not the same as arguing that the message is ideologically/morally "correct" dudes
― Dan I., Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
(I mean, not you in particular aerosmith, just the tone of the posts immediately following the link to the messaging study)
― Dan I., Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:45 (eleven years ago)
yerp, i get it. by all means messaging should be tailored to what people actually respond to, that's self-evident. i still the reserve the right to smdh at humanity, though
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
yeah, i get it.
― i'm cool with effective messaging (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:50 (eleven years ago)
(cue james franco appearance)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:51 (eleven years ago)
ha i was just gonna type that!
― i'm cool with effective messaging (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 17:51 (eleven years ago)
The interview mentions this, but I think a big issue with constant persuasion/messaging/communication failures has to do with "should." We get _really_ hung up with how things should be, and get pissed off when that's not how it actually works. It's the discrepancy between our preconceived/received ideals about how people think, and that all persuasion is automatically coercion is automatically bad and evil in all contexts. Marketing isn't some we do, marketing is something they do! It must be bad!
It's like there's an anger there. "Why don't you think the way I do? It's obvious! I should just have to state this factoid and you should automatically get it and I shouldn't have to shade or couch this in any greater verbiage!"
I've encountered the same issue and emotional reaction with my own attempts; it's the hard realization that accuracy(read: complexity) doesn't help persuasion. And often cuts off your point at the knees.
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
Messaging protip: telling humans that there is pretty much nothing they can do to fix global warming and that we'll likely experience multibillion human climate refugees if not the total extinction of the species is not a great message to get ppl to be active.
― Mordy , Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)
This kinda thing is written about by many people, from Chris Mooney to Mochael Shermer to George Lakoff, and they get into how people actually think and how/why people actually form beliefs.
This Guardian interview with Lakoff gets into it, mirroring that Grist.org interview, where dude is exasperated by the continued failure of leftie folks to figure out what the hell they're doing, how people vote and why, and how to actually talk to people(especially about environmental causes).
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
Well no shit, then you step the fuck up, spend money and time and research and actually figure out what does work.
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
Although it is true that "good guys" (which I hope you'll do me the favor of assuming overlaps at least a little bit with the left) will always be handicapped w/r/t messaging, being (hopefully) unwilling to deploy the full range of cynical rhetorical devices and outright lies that the right doesn't hesitate to use.
― Dan I., Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
I mean, it "worked" when LBJ called that one dude a pig fucker, but...
― Dan I., Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:13 (eleven years ago)
i don't think that option was in the powerpoint slides i saw
― i'm cool with effective messaging (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:16 (eleven years ago)
That's the thing; you don't have completely toss everything moral out. You just have to put some significant export into it, and maybe reevaluate what you're doing wrong when it doesn't work. One of the reasons why the American post-Goldwater rightwing had to spend all those billions is because they had to push people into doing shit that was completely antithetical to the previous several decades . They had to shove the needle such a great deal to the other direction it required a huge expenditure of time and money and effort.
― President Frankenstein (kingfish), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 18:19 (eleven years ago)
Personally I think the environmental movement has been co-opted by the left/the media and the underlying message is that the dangers of global warming are abstract and off in the future. The focus has been taken off the human cost, which is where it should be. The human cost is WAY bigger than in other (Constitutionally dubious) efforts where we expend tons of money.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 19:08 (eleven years ago)
People can understand enemies. The GOP understands their utility. If a Dem candidate at a town hall would show photos of beach houses on the Atlantic coast followed by stock photos of Sandy debris and say, "The GOP wants to destroy your homes. Because they don't believe this will happen, your children will lose their homes and probably their lives in 15 years," it will be more effective.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
honestly dont know why the dems dont flog the corpse of george w bush for the rest of my natural life.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:07 (eleven years ago)
bcz they voted for most of what he did.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
If W ran again, there is a good likelihood he would win. There might have been 6 months in 2008 when that wasn't the case but consider the American voting public.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
dubya's numbers have gone up (everybody's numbers go up after they leave office eventually) but he still polls terribly. there's a reason jeb is sitting on the sidelines so far.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
i'm sure midterms will be very ugly, nationwide. democratic constituencies traditionally don't vote in midterms, forgetting how important the legislative branch is, in favor of charismatic POTUS candidates. we get what we deserve.
Really? Everyone I know - almost all lefties, granted - is more and more incensed by CEO salaries that are 500 times the average worker while the right is railing against teachers' unions etc. (xposts)― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, March 11, 2014
― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, March 11, 2014
100% otm. class issues resonate, maybe more now than ever. you just can't use the sad, tired old rhetoric about "class consciousness." that's hippy-talk, and isn't going to get you anywhere.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
class issues resonate enough that yr paul ryans etc pay some lip service to poverty (turns out lbj is to blame) but it hasn't evolved into the kind of thing that passes legislation or even gets it to the floor really. had occupy emerged in early 2009 instead of or alongside tea party and had it been able to (or even interested in) making demands or persuading ppl who don't know who jeff mangum is maybe things would have been different (maybe not) but as it is dodd-frank, not an esp tough bill in conception, had to be watered down just to pass at a moment when tolerance and respect for wall st was at its lowest ebb in my or even morbs' lifetime. and the only popular outrage, the only mass emails, etc, the only fear put into the hearts of congressmen, came from the grass roots right over it passing at all.
― balls, Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
I think "class-consciousness" is too easily turned into "class warfare" or envy, which are pejorative accusations hurled by the right, when the real issues to me are: of course you could raise the minimum wage without raising the price of a McBurger; your executives could just make less. Why is a teacher's pension a bad thing, but an executive's golden parachute isn't? Why do hedge fund traders make millions by playing a shell game with money? They don't create anything tangible. Etc. etc.
I think Occupy Wall Street was about all of these issues, and more, but getting candidates who are even vocal about it, let alone getting them elected, isn't going to be easy.
― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
I wonder what percentage of congresspeople have never worked a retail or service industry job in their life.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:11 (eleven years ago)
Maybe it has to do with, the most extreme people on the left are maybe more likely to just drop out of society altogether, whereas the more extreme people on the right want to mold it precisely in their image.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:13 (eleven years ago)
This is surely not surprising:
http://ballotpedia.org/Net_Worth_of_United_States_Senators_and_Representatives
― Fakeprog Nilsson (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
Mark Pryor (D-AR) was the least wealthy senator in 2012, with an estimated net worth of $8,500
?????
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
that's still pretty good. my net worth is negative a whole bunch (lol student loans will haunt me forever lol)
― Mordy , Wednesday, 12 March 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
Maybe it has to do with, the most extreme people on the left are maybe more likely to just drop out of society altogether, whereas the more extreme people on the right want to mold it precisely in their image.― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 12, 2014
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, March 12, 2014
lots of people on the far right believe they're being exploited as "useful-idiots" by republican elected officials. the tea-party targeted members of the gop as often, and just as viciously, as they targeted democrats.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:17 (eleven years ago)
Adam's point is OTM. We leftists are stupid and defeatists that way. The right sees no hope but in changing the system; that's why, per Burke and Corey Robin, they're counter-revolutionists.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:27 (eleven years ago)
i thought you were a republican!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:28 (eleven years ago)
not sure why i thought that, but i was pretty sure . . .
wah
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:28 (eleven years ago)
haha.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:29 (eleven years ago)
Most lords are Tories, so What with Alfred's title and all, it was a natural error.
― Aimless, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:38 (eleven years ago)
i assumed alfred's title was an homage to wwe great, lord alfred hayes.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:39 (eleven years ago)
genuine lol there
― balls, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:40 (eleven years ago)
http://www.sheilaomalley.com/archives/tennyson_2.jpg
"Philistine!"
― Aimless, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:44 (eleven years ago)
Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican who is a favorite of the tea party, said supporters of abortion rights chant ''Hail, Satan'' to silence their enemies.
http://killyourculture.com/store/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hail-satan.jpg
it's true, by the way!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:47 (eleven years ago)
you didn't post this:
http://www.anthonywynn.com/bosiebiography/bosie.jpg
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:50 (eleven years ago)
http://image2.findagrave.com/photos250/photos/2005/235/11601825_112490569251.jpg
for alfred, wherever we may find him.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 13 March 2014 00:54 (eleven years ago)
http://news.yahoo.com/house-backs-bill-sue-president-over-laws-210926368.html
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 13 March 2014 05:18 (eleven years ago)
the excellent mike konzcal has a nice response to the recent adolph reed 'harper's' article dismissing the american left
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116962/adolph-reeds-harpers-essay-about-obama-naive-about-tea-party
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 13 March 2014 07:53 (eleven years ago)
aaaaaand hope revives the unemployment benefits package in the Senate. Good luck, House!
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 13 March 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
fuckyeahmikekonzcal
dot tumblr dot com
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 13 March 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
http://optimalhumanmodulation.com/2014/03/14/retro-propaganda-posters-remixed-for-progressive-purposes/
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 14 March 2014 15:13 (eleven years ago)
love 'em
― Nhex, Friday, 14 March 2014 15:40 (eleven years ago)
http://optimalhumanmodulation.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/get_out__by_poasterchild-d5x69df-png.jpg?w=472&h=717
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Friday, 14 March 2014 15:57 (eleven years ago)
"12-year-old boy" is my least favorite strawman
― death and darkness and other night kinda shit (crüt), Friday, 14 March 2014 16:18 (eleven years ago)
Look at the note that quietly appears at the bottom of George Will's latest column
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-russia-and-ukraine-share-a-brutal-history/2014/03/17/da3ab7e0-ae00-11e3-a49e-76adc9210f19_story.html
Note: I wish to apologize to the New York Times for inadvertently reproducing in my March 13 column without attribution 12 words from an October 2007 Times story describing the 1971 Bon Vivant botulism and bankruptcy episode.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 20 March 2014 17:23 (eleven years ago)
thanks george, was wondering
― goole, Thursday, 20 March 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
wait a minute george
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-drop-in-childhood-obesity-may-be-due-to-better-choices/2014/03/12/305c6ba6-a946-11e3-b61e-8051b8b52d06_story.html
Better health through good choices
By George F. Will, Published: March 12 E-mail the writer
In September 1958, a future columnist, then 17, was unpacking as a college freshman when upperclassmen hired by tobacco companies knocked on his dormitory door, distributing free mini-packs of cigarettes. He and many other aspiring sophisticates became smokers. Nearly six years later — 50 years ago: Jan. 11, 1964 — when the surgeon general published the report declaring tobacco carcinogenic, more than 40 percent of U.S. adults smoked. Today, when smoking is considered declasse rather than sophisticated, fewer than one-fifth do.
In 1971, a New York couple decided their Bon Vivant brand vichyssoise tasted strange so they put aside their bowls, too late. Within hours he was dead and she was paralyzed from botulism poisoning. And within a month Bon Vivant was bankrupt, proof of the power of health-related information to change Americans’ behavior.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bon_Vivant_botulism_case
funny those both look like a case of the power of the public sector to protect consumers from carelessness and disinformation to me
― goole, Thursday, 20 March 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
For a minute I thought it was going to be more the kind of plagiarism my students do, where for just no reason at all we've suddenly jumped to a bunch of words on a completely unrelated topic pasted in after fairly inattentive googling.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 21 March 2014 00:08 (eleven years ago)
The latest on the CIA vs Senate Intelligence Committee thing. Harry Reid steps in:
The Justice Department, which is also reviewing Ms. Feinstein’s accusations, is reluctant to investigate either referral because of the constitutional questions about separation of powers raised by the conflict.In letters sent to Mr. Brennan and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Wednesday, Mr. Reid said he had instructed the Senate’s sergeant-at-arms to conduct a forensic analysis of the committee’s computers to resolve the question of misbehavior on the part of committee staff members.“The C.I.A. has produced no evidence to support its claims that Senate committee staff who have no technical training somehow hacked into the C.I.A.’s highly secure classified networks, an allegation that appears on its face to be patently absurd,” Mr. Reid wrote to Mr. Brennan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/21/us/politics/reid-orders-computer-review-to-defend-senate-in-rift-with-cia.html?emc=edit_th_20140321&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=31119931&_r=0
― curmudgeon, Friday, 21 March 2014 13:13 (eleven years ago)
president paul gonna put a stop to all this nonsense.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 21 March 2014 17:13 (eleven years ago)
rate as a joke vs President Hil will
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 March 2014 17:37 (eleven years ago)
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/03/20/african-american-man-confronts-paul-ryan-town-hall-racist-comments.html
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 March 2014 04:53 (eleven years ago)
while George Will doubles down
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-f-will-the-lefts-half-century-of-denial-over-poverty/2014/03/21/1aeaff4e-b049-11e3-a49e-76adc9210f19_story.html?hpid=z2
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)
conservatives never missing an opportunity to misrepresent the moynihan report
― balls, Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
Will, who considered Moynihan a friend, shows his hand by consistently quoting the most consistently quoted section of the report. It's beneath him to read TNC's column yesterday showing how the problem with the black problem predates the sixties and in fact stretches back to, oh, slavery.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:31 (eleven years ago)
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/03/black-pathology-and-the-closing-of-the-progressive-mind/284523/
T. Coates weighs in on Chait's take and Paul Ryan's
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
^^ that's the column
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:35 (eleven years ago)
Coates also takes on Obama's comments on the subject
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
http://politicalblindspot.com/the-food-stamp-capital-of-the-u-s-is-white-and-republican/
I keep seeing references to this Kentucky region on facebook
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 March 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
If only the poor would apply themselves like George F. Will has and become Opinion Writers. That's some real serious work, right there.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 22 March 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
How long do you think it takes Will's unpaid intern to shit one of these columns out? I bet he/she gets it done before lunch.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 22 March 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
What is it about Will's cultural upbringing that he has borrowed phrasing for a column without attribution and for years has been using interns to write his column...
― curmudgeon, Monday, 24 March 2014 15:37 (eleven years ago)
Enough about poverty, lets get back to predicting how doomed the Dems are come November
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_03/nate_silvers_latest_forecast_s049593.php
― curmudgeon, Monday, 24 March 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
Didn't know about the climate change denier on 538; urk.
― Nhex, Monday, 24 March 2014 15:45 (eleven years ago)
pielke (jr - sr is a douche as well) isn't really a full denier. he's in the more dangerous category of skeptics who accept the basic premise of climate change but ceaselessly contribute research and soundbytes that suggest that it won't be that bad and that we probably shouldn't worry about it so much. which, nothing wrong with that in theory! if some researcher made a mindblowing discovery tomorrow that climate change wasn't really a big deal after all, using credible methodology, then the whole world would throw a gigantic fucking party. i would be drunk for at least 4 years, straight. but the problem is that pielke and others of his ilk are misleading, are quickly debunked by a large chunk of the scientific community, and then proceed to ignore all criticisms of their methodologies and continue forward gung ho like nothing happened.
― love and light (Karl Malone), Monday, 24 March 2014 15:57 (eleven years ago)
^ lol, that pretty much defines the "noise" that silver supposedly wants to cut through, right? good thing we have so many "experts" and "researchers" represented in the news w/r/t climate change. this dude + the freakonomics assholes make me want to crawl in a cave and exclusively read academic journals
― hug niceman (psychgawsple), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 00:09 (eleven years ago)
The freakonomics make me want to slap them across the face very dramatically, like *smack* stop *smack* stop it *smack* you stop it *smack*
― love and light (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 01:27 (eleven years ago)
The freakonomics guys, that is. I'd love to line their faces up and then smack them both from right to left, then back again to the right
― love and light (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 01:28 (eleven years ago)
Krugman vs Silver.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 12:15 (eleven years ago)
the Dems deserve to be dooned in Nov; we don't.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 12:21 (eleven years ago)
did anyone post this?
https://vine.co/v/MMVTYBhqVOd/
― chinavision!, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 13:03 (eleven years ago)
http://www.traileraddict.com/content/20th-century-fox/avp.jpg
― Mordy , Tuesday, 25 March 2014 13:04 (eleven years ago)
krugman otm pretty much and the only real fair 538 crit i've seen (lotta ppl spent a lot of time sharpening knives). love the site and it's very early going still but it's generally been clever fluff. fluff w/ some basis in actual observation and analysis as opposed to spin and beltway cw but fluff nonetheless. grantland use of advanced stats, etc is and was more substantial from day one, though this might have just been simmons greater (which is to say existent at all) sympathy w/ stat skeptics and outsider perspective to that world.
― balls, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 13:13 (eleven years ago)
thinking about pryor this morning - can anyone else recall another case of a long time senator running unopposed one race and then generally being very very likely to lose the next race thru no fault of his own ie due to national trends against that senator's party?
― balls, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 13:18 (eleven years ago)
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius
Most of the Senate seats up for vote in November are in states won by Romney. I have read some folks make the argument that if Obama et. al. had embraced a more leftist economic populist argument, that they could sell that somehow even to red region rural voters, and that such a philosophy would encourage the Dem base to turn out more than it normally does in non-presidential year elections. But alas, we have the Democratic party that we have (and maybe the above wouldn't work), and perhaps it will soon be in the minority in the Senate with Mitch Mcconnell running things.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
Mitch McConnell winning his seat again is far from a certainty.
Who would take over the leadership role if he fails to come back?
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 15:22 (eleven years ago)
You'd think they'd want a veteran legislator running things but does congress even do that anymore?
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
good lord the senate republicans are all clowns.. just looking at this list of seniority you have the top tier
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Senators_in_the_113th_Congress_by_seniority
McCainHatchMcConnell
Followed by these idiots gifted to us by Rove
GrahamChamblissAlexanderCornynCoburnThune
And the Obama backlash crew highlighted by
KirkPortmanRubio Paul
uuuuuuuuf
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 17:10 (eleven years ago)
the Dems deserve to be dooned in Nov.― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius)________________________________Most of the Senate seats up for vote in November are in states won by Romney. I have read some folks make the argument that if Obama et. al. had embraced a more leftist economic populist argument, that they could sell that somehow even to red region rural voters, and that such a philosophy would encourage the Dem base to turn out more than it normally does in non-presidential year elections. But alas, we have the Democratic party that we have (and maybe the above wouldn't work), and perhaps it will soon be in the minority in the Senate with Mitch Mcconnell running things.― curmudgeon, Tuesday, March 25, 2014
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius)
________________________________
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, March 25, 2014
looking forward to the inevitable avalanche of stories about how the "gop is back," or that the democrats "got a deserved shellacking," or that this raises "ominous clouds" over the democratic party's collective heads as they stumble, disheartened and racked by infighting, toward 2016.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
nah i've already read a few pieces (including from the right) ceding 2014 to the gop and saying it's a pyrrhic victory at most, a few saying it's the kind of short term win that prevents the party from making the kind of adaptations it needs to have better long term national prospects. dems always in disarray of course but if any narrative emerges my guess is it would be the grown ups taking their party back, a return to seriousness from the gop, and maybe some tea leaves analysis about who it helps in 2014.
― balls, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:42 (eleven years ago)
that's a fair reading, but it's also true (from what i read at least) that obama hoped to capitalize on gop overreach in the 2012 -- 2014 period to have a clinton-like gain in the midterm during his second-term. i'm not really paying attention much (for good reasons and bad reasons, i guess), but i hear less and less about the prospects for obama's second-term agenda.
that's not to say the second-term is wasted! far from it. many of the key aca regulations are being written in the second term, and will be much harder to undo for the new president, there's lots that can be accomplished acting around congress, and so forth. but focusing on that still constitutes a significant lowering of expectations.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
and will be much harder to undo for the new president
PRESIDENT RAND PAUL, i should say.
http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/rand-paul-dead-sea.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:52 (eleven years ago)
your expectations were significant for a second term?
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
meh.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:54 (eleven years ago)
GOP will be in the same position in 2016 as Dems now.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 19:58 (eleven years ago)
(except they'll have a HEAVYWEIGHT presidential nominee leading their party to victory.)
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:07 (eleven years ago)
98 anomaly was due to really good gotv effort (which dems can vaguely hope to replicate) and super unpopular congress getting ready to impeach a super popular president (obama's only got one part of that equation)
― balls, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:09 (eleven years ago)
'98 and '02 the only midterm elections since '34 in which the party in power won seats
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:16 (eleven years ago)
super unpopular congress getting ready to impeach a super popular president (obama's only got one part of that equation)― balls, Tuesday, March 25, 2014
― balls, Tuesday, March 25, 2014
true but this is a super duper unpopular congress. i was hoping to get sumthin sumthin outa that.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:23 (eleven years ago)
538 on weird state if 2016 race right now - http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/a-historically-divided-republican-field-for-2016/. kinda interesting as a reminder that it is still very early and we have very little idea what 2016 field looks like really but mainly i like this as a glimpse of cw of yesteryear - ppl thought ford would run in 80!
― balls, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
haven't dug into the 538 article yet, but hasn't this ("historically divided republican field") been true for the last few election cycles? mccain slipped through when the right couldn't back a single candidate; romney slipped through when the right couldn't back a single candidate; RAND PAUL WILL SMASH THROUGH THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARIES LIKE HULK SMASHING A TINY DOLLHOUSE
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
also recently read some gop analysts saying that, notwithstanding the current polling, if he decides to run, jeb bush clears the field, quickly.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
nobody really knows anything right now it's march of 2014
― Clay, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
if I have to endure another fucking bush presidency I am going to kill myself
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
some insight on the possibility of a jeb bush presidential run in 2016, from yesterday's sun sentinel.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
if I have to endure another fucking bush Clinton presidency I am going to kill myself
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:36 (eleven years ago)
After 8 years, it is possible that the public will no longer be repelled by the idea of a president named 'Bush'. God knows, stranger things have happened.
― I wear the fucking pin, don't I? (Aimless), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:37 (eleven years ago)
if we have to endure another fucking bush or clinton presidency, there will be trouble
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:37 (eleven years ago)
hrc presidency would be awesome. so. many. conspiracy. theories.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:37 (eleven years ago)
what i like about jeb bush is that i can really see myself having a beer with him, you know just hanging out and having a beer
― love and light (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
he look interesting.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
ha ha
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 22:41 (eleven years ago)
i tell myself that maybe hrc could be the taft/lbj to obama's tr/jfk but really the best likelihood is maybe a scotus shift
― balls, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 02:12 (eleven years ago)
sure as hell she won't be Poppy.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 02:16 (eleven years ago)
it'a MADHOUSE
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 03:17 (eleven years ago)
Clinton vs. Bush in 2016. Name your poison.
― I wear the fucking pin, don't I? (Aimless), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 03:47 (eleven years ago)
Let's all vote for Nader again
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 06:36 (eleven years ago)
clinton bush bush clinton. you act like there are no other viable choices.
http://rlv.zcache.com/alex_jones_for_president_2016_ceramic_tiles-r9489ef85c4644adbb1218358cca2684d_agtk1_8byvr_512.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 07:10 (eleven years ago)
that would be the best campaign
― (or if you must, "data") (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 26 March 2014 13:44 (eleven years ago)
nice overview if ga senate race - http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/gop-its-own-worst-enemy-ga-senate-race
i'm still skeptical about potential for dem pickup but i do know republicans who've told me if kingston doesn't win they're voting nunn
― balls, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 14:27 (eleven years ago)
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/25/gop_rep_dana_rohrabacher_half_defends_russias_annexation_of_crimea/
― goole, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
hmm - https://twitter.com/costareports/status/448995819971411969
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 01:56 (eleven years ago)
omg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qDcVsrrd97o/TrWsRQlZKEI/AAAAAAAACuI/VMenQNX3gXw/s1600/herman-cain-smoking.png
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 02:01 (eleven years ago)
. . . it . . . can't . . . be . . .
he's back.
http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/120524_herman_cain_ap-e1339992173667.jpeg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 02:03 (eleven years ago)
cain got what he wanted out of 2012, no way he throws that away
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 02:08 (eleven years ago)
Robert Costa @costareports 3h -- Keep an eye on this space on Thursday morning. The CW about 2016 on the R side will be shaken up w/ a new development...
hmmm . . .
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 03:33 (eleven years ago)
would she be worse than hillz?
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 27 March 2014 03:45 (eleven years ago)
yes???
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 03:58 (eleven years ago)
? - http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/billionaire-mogul-sheldon-adelson-looks-for-mainstream-republican-who-can-win-in-2016/2014/03/25/e2f47bb0-b3c2-11e3-8cb6-284052554d74_story.html
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:05 (eleven years ago)
costa's tweet is so cryptic, and followed by another tweet that puts a different gloss on it (e.g., that the "shake-up" in conventional-wisdom he mentioned has more to do with gop infrastructure (e.g., "how things are being organized behind the scenes")) that it's impossible to really have any idea what he's talking about.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:06 (eleven years ago)
condy is running! sheldon backs so-and-so! jindal's organizational and money advantages are making him a romney-like front-runner! something about gop procedure that might impact the primaries!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:08 (eleven years ago)
maybe they're banning debates
― Clay, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:11 (eleven years ago)
haha. they should go the other way, and have day-long debates, in a college-basketball style bracket.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:12 (eleven years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-X0e-MB-LNhs/UVBXuS5RdkI/AAAAAAAAGDg/4jlgwdHwKWo/s1600/2016+Bracket,+Championship.png
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:14 (eleven years ago)
yeah those kind of tweets happen from time to time, some times editor had one a couple of months back, and they're inevitably not actually that groundshaking. when the real gamechangers are in the pipeline either it goes up pretty quickly, you get weeks of whispers and vague allusions, or the writer is steeling himself for the tv spots and fallout coming. didn't know until the adelson story that jeb was that committed to a run.
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:16 (eleven years ago)
to be fair, costa's a v good journalist, and i take what he says seriously. but still, i'm not expecting "earth-shaking" news. what would be earth-shaking, anyway? rice announcing her candidacy would, i suppose.
jeb bush has been on-the-fence, but you have to figure he sees an opening in the "moderate" wing of the gop if christie fades.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:19 (eleven years ago)
i love that gop bracket, by the way.
round one jeb v. boehner and perry v. trump would be so epic.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:20 (eleven years ago)
i'm not sure their own wives would tune into a pawlenty vs daniels debate
― Clay, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:25 (eleven years ago)
yeah rice would be the only entry that might move poll numbers that would shock me and i don't think she would actually last that long in the race, wes clark/libby dole redux. can't imagine bush and kasich would spend time in the room w/ adelson if they weren't both very interested in running, sorta surprised paul ryan isn't mentioned in that group (i still have him as my favorite though one day i'll actually watch a scott walker speech and see if he has any charisma)(and isn't walker very possibly gonna lose this fall anyway? plz plz plz wisconsin?). maybe it's gonna be an announcement of that southeastern super tuesday that's supposedly been in the works. btw gop good idea for picking a nationally electable candidate, let the south decide, foolproof.
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:26 (eleven years ago)
i'm not sure their own wives would tune into a pawlenty vs daniels debate― Clay, Thursday, March 27, 2014
― Clay, Thursday, March 27, 2014
true. but condi v nikki? omg.
that'd be better than heat v pacers.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:28 (eleven years ago)
paul ryan isn't mentioned in that group (i still have him as my favorite)
won't happen.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:31 (eleven years ago)
condi publicly said in 2012 that she will never run for prez for whatever that's worth
― Clay, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:39 (eleven years ago)
yeah i don't think condi is running. alot of the base hates her, and not generally for 'she's was head of the nsa on 9/10' or 'she served in the bush cabinet' or 'leather is murder' reasons. also, frankly,
http://fashionista.com/uploads/2012/08/224326_476632089015654_1819234962_n-300x406.jpg
this person isn't winning anything
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 04:44 (eleven years ago)
turns out rand paul is running
― goole, Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:00 (eleven years ago)
legacy war democrat vs the infowars republican. can't say i'm looking fwd to this one.
― goole, Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:03 (eleven years ago)
don't worry, it won't happen
there's a sep thread for the Chief Sockpuppet circus, guys
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:07 (eleven years ago)
Robert Costa @costareports 6h -- SCOOP: ’16 begins… Rand Paul, ahead of all others, has formed 50-state nat’l ldshp team, 200+ people, per aides... http://wapo.st/1l69Om7
rand paul's notion of a 50-state, centralized political machine is very disturbing. all political organizations supporting a nu-wave libertarian gop potus candidate should be independently organized and maintained at the state or local level, where they can be more responsive to the people.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:27 (eleven years ago)
I don't quite get how that's disturbing - isn't this what Bush II and Obama pretty much did?
― Nhex, Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:33 (eleven years ago)
he's being jokey. paul could win a couple of primaries but he's no real threat to win. prism will be an issue at least and there will be an actual foreign policy debate, can't say the same for the dem race.
― balls, Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:38 (eleven years ago)
joeks.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
Prism will be an issue that each side can blame the other on, and not do anything about it.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 27 March 2014 16:32 (eleven years ago)
Isn't there already a 2016 presidential speculation thread for this sort of 2016 presidential speculating?
― I wear the fucking pin, don't I? (Aimless), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/for-columnist-a-change-of-tone/
homie, maybe your site just sucks
― surfbort memes get played out, totally (k3vin k.), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:15 (eleven years ago)
lol @ keeping the NYT "mr" style and referring to himself in the third person, too
― surfbort memes get played out, totally (k3vin k.), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:16 (eleven years ago)
The real cause of Krugman’s disdain is the sheer ambition of Silver’s new venture. Silver’s great added value was to bring basic statistical literacy to the fields of political forecasting and sports commentary, which are dominated by old-line hacks who rely on horse sense and either disdain data in any form or use data very badly.The new FiveThirtyEight tries to expand this revelatory contribution to other fields. The trouble is that many of those fields, like economics and climate science, already have real experts. Silver’s role, at least in its crudest form, represents the kind of autodidactism that Krugman rose to fame decrying. His war against Silver is nothing terribly new, but merely the return of an old love, or, more accurately, an old hate.
chait otm
― surfbort memes get played out, totally (k3vin k.), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
rand paul is a really disappointing reveal there, that dude is comic relief
― (or if you must, "data") (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
under 538 "science" header, i see:
When Picking a Bracket, It's Easier to Be Accurate Than Skillful
need to check out some bracket science
― a nation filled with lead (Hunt3r), Thursday, 27 March 2014 17:55 (eleven years ago)
what will be the best thing about the coming rand paul presidency?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 23:31 (eleven years ago)
could be the hairpiece.
it is a hairpiece, right? got to be.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 27 March 2014 23:32 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/LxLPe1Y.png
― I don't care if you're Black Sabbath, James White, or Deep Purple (Karl Malone), Thursday, 27 March 2014 23:41 (eleven years ago)
question deserves its own thread imo
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 27 March 2014 23:45 (eleven years ago)
that's nothing. when he's president, rand paul won't wear any pants at all.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 00:56 (eleven years ago)
what is he, the Maestro from Seinfeld?
― Nhex, Friday, 28 March 2014 00:58 (eleven years ago)
he is the riddler from batman!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 01:02 (eleven years ago)
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_sSZEt13lZJE/S3g-k6QJGjI/AAAAAAAAA8s/H8m7AQskG_E/s800/Rand%20Paul.jpg
alien's on rand's 50-state steering committee.
un-stopp-able.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 01:03 (eleven years ago)
never change, WWN.
― Nhex, Friday, 28 March 2014 01:04 (eleven years ago)
You can't trust that alienIirc he backed Perot, Bush and Clinton at various times in 92
― I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Friday, 28 March 2014 12:35 (eleven years ago)
not the same alien.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 12:38 (eleven years ago)
http://darrengarnick.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/weekly-world-news-alien-endorses-bush-and-clinton.jpg
Oh i see the difference
― I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Friday, 28 March 2014 12:41 (eleven years ago)
damn, where is the space visitor who can tell us how to rebuild the U.S. economy when we need him now?
― bizarro gazzara, Friday, 28 March 2014 13:29 (eleven years ago)
We should just vote for the alien.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 28 March 2014 15:58 (eleven years ago)
campaign theme -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOaqDEjxQAU
― balls, Friday, 28 March 2014 16:03 (eleven years ago)
p'lod only backs winners, but when he doesn't have a dog-in-the-fight, his record of predicting election results isn't so hot.
http://weeklyworldnews.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/plod_predictsz1-copy.jpg?w=610
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 17:46 (eleven years ago)
honestly i'm surprised p'lod endorsed rand paul, considering his long history with hillary.
http://www.wwnstore.com/content/178802/hillaryvdaypolitical.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 28 March 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_03/fifth_circuit_seems_to_find_no049671.php
5th Circuit panel, with three conservative women justices, upholds Texas restrictions on abortion clinics.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 28 March 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)
Robert Costa @costareports 1hWhat's happening right now in GOP world--a turn away from Christie, real movement for Jeb ...
bush really has a chance to "clear the field" early. i don't think he'll be hurt at all by the "bush legacy," and beyond that, his only problems are his low profile in the obama years and his immigration stance. otherwise, if chrisite's really down-and-out . . .
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 29 March 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
CIA misled on interrogation programs
One official said that almost all of the critical threat-related information from Abu Zubaida was obtained during the period when he was questioned by Soufan at a hospital in Pakistan, well before he was interrogated by the CIA and waterboarded 83 times.
Information obtained by Soufan, however, was passed up through the ranks of the U.S. intelligence community, the Justice Department and Congress as though it were part of what CIA interrogators had obtained, according to the committee report.
“The CIA conflated what was gotten when, which led them to misrepresent the effectiveness of the program,” said a second U.S. official who has reviewed the report. The official described the persistence of such misstatements as among “the most damaging” of the committee’s conclusions.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 14:31 (eleven years ago)
shocking
― waterbabies (waterface), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 14:41 (eleven years ago)
this is p funny but come on, no nerdshaming in 2014
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/florida-gop-candidate-vampire-role-player
― goole, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
http://www.saintpetersblog.com/jake-russ-conservative-congressional-gop-hopefuls-bizarre-double-life
― goole, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 19:33 (eleven years ago)
Not a Trivial Enterprise
MES, extremely trademarked and organized, is by no means a trivial enterprise. It is a highly regimented association of like-minded people, similar to a church (or cult) complete with its own rituals and performances.
ok, saintpetersblog
― goole, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 19:34 (eleven years ago)
http://www.businessinsider.com/florida-house-candidate-defends-his-hobby-activities-2014-4
― goole, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
"I have never hid nor shied away from disclosing my hobby activities. When I was hired at the Sheriff’s office, I fully disclosed my gaming and theatre background on the application, and these hobbies posed absolutely no problem or raised any flags. In fact, when applying for undercover work, these hobbies were considered an advantage, so much so my shift lieutenant nicknamed me 'Shakespeare,'" Rush said.
― goole, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
Listed under “other interests” on his bio page, Rush describes himself as a “sworn officer … fo’ real,” suggestive of his double life in the “occult” world and the “real” one, as a lawyer and Alachua County sheriff’s deputy.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:25 (eleven years ago)
"(my) hobbies posed absolutely no problem or raised any flags. In fact, when applying for undercover work, these hobbies were considered an advantage, so much so my shift lieutenant nicknamed me 'Shakespeare.'"
(A)t least one message that Rush appears to have posted on a Yahoo message board in 2010 under his "Chazz Darling" vampire alias is eyebrow-raising. Rush wrote in an explicit and now-deleted post to another role-player that he "wanted to stick my dick in your mouth to shut you up while I snorted a line off my new machete," before warning "you shouldn’t believe everything that people tell you or you’re going to end up naked and sore, tied to the floor of a van marked 'Free Candy,'" according to SaintPetersBlog.
so says shakespeare!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
let those among you who have never threatened to gag someone while snorting a line off a new machete cast the first stone.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
the guy he's challenging is a ding-dong too (i.e., the appropriately named Ted Yoho).
― spread to fuck the fruit (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 1 April 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
that's 100% true.
by the way, good to see you here, eisbaer. hope yr well.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 1 April 2014 21:04 (eleven years ago)
all hail the senior ceo-senator from the great state of koch industries, prince reince walton-bush
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-limits-on-federal-campaign-donations/2014/04/02/54e16c30-ba74-11e3-9a05-c739f29ccb08_story.html
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 2 April 2014 17:14 (eleven years ago)
let us all hail this son of democracy this jowly white squinty eyed fucker from alabama
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 2 April 2014 17:17 (eleven years ago)
8 year old Olivia McConnell had a dream of having the Wooly Mammoth declared the official state fossil of South Carolina. And a law to make it so was on the verge of passage before getting held up on State Sen. Kevin Bryant (R) insistence that the authorizing legislation specify that the God created the mammoth on the "on the sixth day with the beasts of the field."
sorry kid, but you were born in a land of total fuckups
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 2 April 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
get ready for the GOP wave, and for "obama fatigue" to become part of the political landscape.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 3 April 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
feel like we can basically assume no legislation of any significance is going to pass between now and 2017, esp if the GOP take the Senate.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 April 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
Eh. A poll yesterday showed ACA more popular than BHO.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 3 April 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
feel like we can basically assume no legislation of any significance is going to pass between now and 2017, esp if the GOP take the Senate.― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, April 3, 2014
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, April 3, 2014
but you will have maybe two full years of fun impeachment talk.
benghazi! i.r.s.! job-killing, death-panel-authorizing obamacare! worse than watergate™!
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 3 April 2014 20:23 (eleven years ago)
Robert Costa @costareports -- Jeb on illegal immigration: "Yes they broke the law, but it's not a felony... it's an act of love," did it for their families
jeb can't escape this issue, i guess.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:12 (eleven years ago)
hoo boy. knives-out, conservatives.
Christine M Arnold @mytheo1 -- Jeb Bush says it should not be a crime to come to this country illegally to provide a better life for your family. How about bank robbery?_________________________________LaurieAnn @mooshakins -- This RT @LilMissRightie: Take your amnesty push and shove it straight up your fat ass, Jeb."_________________________________Michelle Ray @GaltsGirl -- Just say no to Jeb. #NotHappening_________________________________Karla with a 'K' @BlueSkyHippie -- @LilMissRightie Using Jeb's logic, I can rob a bank to pay my bills because it's an #ActOfLove to take care of my family. #ShutUpJeb_________________________________pamheiders @pamheiders -- Jeb Bush Bleeding heart,dads cross border to feed kids.Sounds like Biden yesterday.Help Mexico get their crap together. #immigrationreform_________________________________Jonathan Ryrie @JonathanRyrie1 -- Chris Christie and Jeb Bush are the "most qualified" Anyone who's read the Constitution is more qualified than they are. #tcot_________________________________Helen Gordon @MercyBabe61 -- Jeb Bush's opinion about Common Core just lost him any consideration from me for President_________________________________Conn Carroll @conncarroll -- Jeb isn't running. No candidate wins a single GOP primary if they support common core._________________________________Ken Gardner @kesgardner -- If Jeb Bush is trying to kill 2016 speculation, the best way is to excuse illegal immigration and defend Common Core in the same interview.
_________________________________
LaurieAnn @mooshakins -- This RT @LilMissRightie: Take your amnesty push and shove it straight up your fat ass, Jeb."
Michelle Ray @GaltsGirl -- Just say no to Jeb. #NotHappening
Karla with a 'K' @BlueSkyHippie -- @LilMissRightie Using Jeb's logic, I can rob a bank to pay my bills because it's an #ActOfLove to take care of my family. #ShutUpJeb
pamheiders @pamheiders -- Jeb Bush Bleeding heart,dads cross border to feed kids.Sounds like Biden yesterday.Help Mexico get their crap together. #immigrationreform
Jonathan Ryrie @JonathanRyrie1 -- Chris Christie and Jeb Bush are the "most qualified" Anyone who's read the Constitution is more qualified than they are. #tcot
Helen Gordon @MercyBabe61 -- Jeb Bush's opinion about Common Core just lost him any consideration from me for President
Conn Carroll @conncarroll -- Jeb isn't running. No candidate wins a single GOP primary if they support common core.
Ken Gardner @kesgardner -- If Jeb Bush is trying to kill 2016 speculation, the best way is to excuse illegal immigration and defend Common Core in the same interview.
outstanding. on the other hand,
BuzzFeed Benny @bennyjohnson -- Longtime Dem strategist Joe Trippi was in the room with Jeb: "I have not been worried about 2016 till now, I see what a threat this guy is."
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
missed this 140 character political-manifesto:
Day of the Eagle @Nottinghams1 -- #ActOfLove #JebBush Patriots risking their lives for our country is an act of love. Not illegal invaders destroying our country Jeb!
mr. day-of-the-eagle "hope(s) we can survive this Commie occupying our white house."
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:37 (eleven years ago)
If Joe Trippi is worried the rest of us can breathe easier.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:37 (eleven years ago)
haha. he apparently also just said an hrc v. jeb general-election inspires the kind of debate that the us "desperately needs."
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)
agree with "desperate"
― Euler, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
"'desperate'! hey, that's funny"
http://themoderatevoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/jeb-and-george-bush-1.jpg
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:48 (eleven years ago)
please don't do that again
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
what, don't miss him yet?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 17:55 (eleven years ago)
another bush, insulated from the poors? yes please!
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:04 (eleven years ago)
lol at the conservative-takeaway here being "JEB SAYS CROSSING THE BORDER ILLEGALLY IS 'AN ACT OF LOVE!'"
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:31 (eleven years ago)
"LOL, leeches feel hunger, not love."
― WilliamC, Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
IllegallyLibertarian @TalonsPoint -- For Jeb Bush so loved illegal aliens, that he gave his only forgotten country, that whosoever votes for him shall not flourish, but have...
smart take.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:36 (eleven years ago)
I believe that commie Jesus had a kind word about love too.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
haha that tweet is awesome. tea party rebellion against common core has been an interesting ongoing development, to a large extent (certainly larger than say fifteen years ago) education policy has become this turf not defined so much by party lines, comparable to foreign policy in some ways. lotta strange bedfellows.
― balls, Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
conservative reaction to that one jeb line on immigration is strange. doesn't seem controversial to (a) oppose any inflow of undocumented citizens and, simultaneously, (b) admit that many undocumented citizens cross the border to achieve a better life for their family (i.e., out of "love" for their family). sad it isn't enough to just disagree on policy grounds.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 6 April 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
joe trippi is so fuckin weird
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 7 April 2014 06:06 (eleven years ago)
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/07/jonathan_chaits_epic_race_fail_how_a_story_about_racism_and_obama_goes_horribly_wrong/
I haven't read Chait's latest New York mag cover story yet, but some folks are clearly not impressed, like Joan Walsh at Salon:
I’m glad Jonathan Chait told us that his poorly argued, slightly paranoid New York magazine cover story, “Why Race Has Been the Real Story of Obama’s Presidency All Along,” was written before his epic wrangle with Ta-Nehisi Coates over Paul Ryan and the “culture” of black poverty. Because otherwise, it could only be read as the self-pitying rant of someone who has lost a historically defining argument – someone who has been “sonned,” to use Coates’ term — and is still too hurt to have access to his powers of reason.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 April 2014 14:07 (eleven years ago)
Another dismissal of Chait's piece.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/04/jonathan_chait_race_and_obama_s_presidency_what_about_the_experience_of.html
If I were outlining a racial history of the Obama administration, it would begin with policy: A housing collapse that destroyed black Americans’ wealth; a health care law attacked as “reparations” and crippled by a neo-Calhounite doctrine of “state sovereignty”; a broad assault on voting rights and access to the polls, concentrated in the states of the former Confederacy. Indeed, it would focus on the deep irony of the Obama era: That the first black president has presided over a declining status quo for many black Americans.In short, it would treat race as a real force in public life that has real consequences for real people.You should contrast this with Jonathan Chait’s most recent feature for New York magazine, where the story of race in the Obama administration is a story of mutual grievance between Americans on the left and right, with little interest in the lived experiences of racism from black Americans and other people of color. It’s a story, in other words, that treats race as an intellectual exercise—a low-stakes cocktail party argument between white liberals and white conservatives over their respective racial innocence….
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 13:47 (eleven years ago)
An incumbent Arkansas Dem Senator holding on to a lead.
http://talkbusiness.net/2014/04/pryor-holds-small-lead-cotton-high-profile-u-s-senate-race/
The Arkansas U.S. Senate race has become one of the highest-profile in the nation with millions of advertising dollars spent by both campaigns and a variety of outside groups. That spending appears not to have moved the race much, suggesting that the race will remain close at least until the point when voters engage after Labor Day.
Looking below the top line of numbers, Pryor’s tiny lead is driven by his particularly strong lead with women voters (he leads that group by 10 points). In contrast, Cotton has a 7 point lead (48-41%) with male voters.
Pryor has also coalesced African-American support and is also running strongly among Latino voters, while Cotton has a 5 point lead with white voters. Both candidates have strong support from their fellow partisans and while Cotton leads among independent voters 50-34 that lead is not quite strong enough to fully offset the slightly larger percentage of the electorate that remains Democratic.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 13:51 (eleven years ago)
go pryor. whole GOP should be in jail at this point imho
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 14:40 (eleven years ago)
donate to pryor's campaign imo it's important
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 15:45 (eleven years ago)
lol wait oops maybe not
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
But of course Republican Tom Cotton is even worse on that issue:
Cotton’s voting record backs his words, scoring 100 percent on votes tracked by the National Right to Life. Pryor scores a 35 percent on his votes tracked by the same group in his 12 years in the Senate.
http://arkansasnews.com/jason-tolbert/cotton-contrast-pryor-abortion
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/04/obama-racism-and-the-presumption-of-innocence.html
Chait's defense of his piece--he and Obama are the only sensible reasonable adults; plus ideology can not include racism unless it is explicit
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:16 (eleven years ago)
i kind of agree with chait tactically while thinking his critics have all been right on substance
― goole, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:27 (eleven years ago)
i'm white btw
what he doesn't outright say, but should have, is that conservatives have worked themselves around to the position where they love love love to get called racist, which now means you don't have anything "real" to say and they've won the argument.
― goole, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:28 (eleven years ago)
chait's piece was kind of all over the place. disagreed with a lot of it, but some interesting stuff. i don't think joan walsh's dismissal is fair.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)
welp
http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/jim-demint-is-pretty-sure-the-government-didnt-play-a-role-in-ending-slavery/360418/
― goole, Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:49 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Wednesday, April 9, 2014 1:28 PM (23 minutes ago)
― Oren Zombarchi (WilliamC), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
goole otm
as much as i dislke chait he's a much brighter guy than most of the people he's engaging with here (TNC being the glaring exception). his response to kilgore was deeply stupid though, i thought:
And Kilgore is right, of course, that Republican policies tend to enrich a disproportionately white constituency and harm a disproportionately nonwhite one. He thus deems the question of motive irrelevant. But suppose we lived in a world where Democrats wanted to redistribute even more resources from the (disproportionately white) rich to the (disproportionately nonwhite) working-class and poor. At some point, the level of redistribution could be high enough that Kilgore himself would object — say, a federal government consuming one third, or one half, or two thirds, of the economy. Would it be fair to describe his agenda as objectively racist? Would that free Kilgore’s left-wing critics from taking his stated objections at face value?
this is an absurd hypothetical. i get that he's trying to counter the thrust of kilgore's (imo otm) argument, which is that effects matter as much as intentions, but redistributive policy is so clearly reparatory -- i don't think most liberals would deny it -- that it doesn't really work as the analog of trickle-down. it's so near pulling the reverse racism card that i think even chait is above it
― surfbort memes get played out, totally (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)
even if the only good reason for redistributive policy isn't reparation (and it's not), it's at least a desired effect. conservatives would never admit that they're fine with the effects of their economic policy. it's a characteristic false balance
― surfbort memes get played out, totally (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 9 April 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
chait is writing about giving the benefit of the doubt to conservatives that they're not racists, but of course his argument is equally (or more so) applicable to fellow travelers on the left
― Mordy , Wednesday, 9 April 2014 19:22 (eleven years ago)
In a theoretical way yes, but he garbles the discussion of racism; and he does not properly address the impact and result of actions or statements
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 10 April 2014 13:35 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/10/business/doctor-with-big-medicare-billings-is-no-stranger-to-scrutiny.html?emc=edit_th_20140410&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=31119931&_r=0
The pattern of large Medicare payments and six-figure political donations shows up among several of the doctors whose payment records were released for the first time this week by the Department of Health and Human Services. For years, the department refused to make the data public, and finally did so only after being sued by The Wall Street Journal.Topping the list is Dr. Salomon E. Melgen, 59, an ophthalmologist from North Palm Beach, Fla., who received $21 million in Medicare reimbursements in 2012 alone. The doctor billed a bulk of his reimbursements for Lucentis, a medication used to treat macular degeneration made by a company that pays generous rebates to its doctors.
Dr. Melgen’s firm donated more than $700,000 to Majority PAC, a super PAC run by former aides to the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada. The super PAC then spent $600,000 to help re-elect Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, who is a close friend of Dr. Melgen’s. Last year, Mr. Menendez himself became a target of investigation after the senator intervened on behalf of Dr. Melgen with federal officials and took flights on his private jet.
Here's a long Washington Monthly article on the hisotry of this issue, with suggestions at the end re how to change it.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/july_august_2013/features/special_deal045641.php?page=all
Some reformers point to a provision in Obamacare that might allow for an end run around Congress. The law creates a new entity, the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which, if Medicare costs outstrip the Consumer Price Index, will have the power to cut or change Medicare provider payments unilaterally. Its decisions can be overturned by Congress only if lawmakers pass alternative cost-cutting measures of equal size. Statutorily, IPAB could create a government-run equivalent of the RUC. Whether it will ever get a chance to exercise that power, however, is an open question: IPAB is a major political target for both Republicans who are demanding its immediate abolition and some Democrats who enjoy close ties to the medical drug and device industry.
The second option to solving the RUC problem would be to get Medicare out of the business of funding fee-for-service medicine. Reformers have been complaining for years that paying providers per procedure creates incentives for gaming and overuse that are difficult, if not impossible, to overcome. Under Obamacare, the CMS is already taking modest steps away from fee-for-service billing by expanding experiments in “bundled payments,” whereby providers are paid a lump sum to take care of patients with certain conditions, like diabetes or heart disease. The AMA, aware of the growing backlash in Washington against fee-for-service, has endorsed some of Medicare’s bundling initiatives.
But we need to go much further. It’s no coincidence that numerous studies have found that the best-quality and lowest-cost health care in America can be found in systems like Veterans Affairs and Utah’s Intermountain Healthcare where doctors are on salary and paid for keeping their patients well, not according to a fee-for-service system. As this magazine has argued (see Phillip Longman, “The Cure”), the federal government should set a certain date at which Medicare will pay only for health services provided by integrated systems.
Such a move would be fiercely resisted by organized medicine, and specialist societies in particular. But it would be the surest way to control the nation’s health care costs while improving health outcomes. And it would have a delightful side benefit: with fee-for-service eliminated, there would be no need to have thirty-one doctors sit in a ballroom in Chicago and centrally plan the pricing minutia of thousands of medical services and procedures. The RUC, in other words, would be made obsolete.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 10 April 2014 15:06 (eleven years ago)
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/april/10/is-the-us-or-the-world-coming-to-an-end-.aspx
Ctrl-f for "blew up"
― goole, Thursday, 10 April 2014 15:12 (eleven years ago)
holy shit
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 10 April 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
whole lotta crazy there
― nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Thursday, 10 April 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
eschatology is a nightmare from which i am trying to awake
― Mordy , Thursday, 10 April 2014 16:34 (eleven years ago)
reminds me of one of my favorite wiki pages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events
― anonanon, Thursday, 10 April 2014 16:52 (eleven years ago)
Chris Wallace on Fox vs Congressman Levin, on Fox's second favorite subject behind Benghazi...
I'm asking you a specific question. How do you explain the fact that 30 percent of progressive groups were examined for their tax exempt status eligibility and 100 percent of conservative groups? How do you explain that?
LEVIN: I'll explain it. It also does what I said to respond to your question as to what's going on here.
More Tea Party groups and conservative groups applied for 501c4 status than other groups. In 2006, of the 501c4 organizations, only $1 million was spent on election campaign stuff. In 2012, $256 million and two of the organizations were Koch brother organizations and a third was Karl Rove. So, one half --
WALLACE: But, sir, it still does not explain -- you can say that there are more conservative groups. It doesn't explain why 100 percent of conservative groups were examined and only 30 percent of liberal groups. It doesn't matter if it was 10-3, it was 100 percent of the conservative groups, and 30 percent of the liberal groups.
blah blah blah
― curmudgeon, Monday, 14 April 2014 16:40 (eleven years ago)
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-sunday-chris-wallace/2014/04/13/did-kathleen-sebelius-have-go-will-doj-pursue-criminal-charges-against-lois-lerner
And George Will on the same show later re voting rights and election law changes:
WILL: Sure. Look, liberalism has a kind of Tourette's syndrome these days. It's just constantly saying the word "racism" and "racist." It's an old saying in the law. If you have a law on your side, argue the law, if you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have neither, pound the table. This is pounding the table. There is a kind of intellectual poverty now. Liberalism hasn't had a new idea since the 1960s except ObamaCare and the country doesn't like it. Foreign policy is a shambles from Russia to Iran to Syria to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And recovery is unprecedentedly bad. So what do you do? You say anyone who criticizes us is a racist. It's become a joke among young people. You go to a campus where this kind of political correctness reins, and some young person will say looks like it's going to rain. The person listening says, you're a racist. I mean it's so inappropriate. The constant implication of this that it is, I think, becoming a national mirth.
zzzzzzz
― curmudgeon, Monday, 14 April 2014 16:59 (eleven years ago)
George Will, pal of college students everywhere
― curmudgeon, Monday, 14 April 2014 17:01 (eleven years ago)
new ways to ruin the "pound the table" bromide
― political correctness reins (Hunt3r), Monday, 14 April 2014 17:03 (eleven years ago)
i'd pound the table if his head was on it
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 April 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
i'd pound his head with my DICK
― waterbabies (waterface), Monday, 14 April 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
It's become a joke among young people. You go to a campus where this kind of political correctness reins, and some young person will say looks like it's going to rain. The person listening says, you're a racist. I mean it's so inappropriate.
Usually I can understand what Will is trying to say, even though I don't agree with him. In this case I have no idea wtf he's even talking about
― Karl Malone, Monday, 14 April 2014 17:20 (eleven years ago)
Foreign policy is a shambles from Russia to Iran to Syria to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
god Will is such a hateful hack. never mind that whole ending two wars/killing terrorists stuff (War on Terror what now?)
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 14 April 2014 17:22 (eleven years ago)
In the later Bush years and the first couple of Obama's he called intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan mistakes but couldn't be seen to support troop pullouts and such because otherwise he wouldn't get green room time anymore.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 April 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
lol i'm pretty sure that will campus "joke" is a zizek anecdote
― Mordy , Monday, 14 April 2014 17:57 (eleven years ago)
the height of irresponsibility: http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/story?id=132557
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 14 April 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
Sept 2002:
Disasters Happen When Action Comes Too Late by George Will Sen. John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who aspires to be the 44th president, accuses the 43rd of “hasty war talk.” The adjective “hasty” suggests impetuousness. But in New Hampshire on Dec. 2, 1999, he said: “If I found in any way, shape or form that (Saddam Hussein) was developing weapons of mass destruction, I’d take ‘em out.” Although he spoke of disarming Iraq, not “regime change,” surely after more than a decade of U.N. impotence regarding disarmament of Iraq, the burden of proof is on those who say disarmament can be achieved without regime change. In 1999, Bush said the trigger for pre-emptive action against Iraq should be not just Iraq’s acquisition of such weapons, but Iraqi progress in “developing” them. Hence the importance of evidence that Iraq, which has endured sanctions costing it upward of $200 billion rather than permit weapons inspections, has been buying hardware needed to develop nuclear weapons. Those who are most skeptical about the justification for military action to depose Saddam pass over his possession of chemical and biological weapons, and ask: Is his acquisition of nuclear weapons “imminent?” But skeptics must answer this question: Suppose U.S. forces topple Saddam and discover that instead of having been one year away from acquiring such weapons, he had been, say, four years away. For what, exactly, would America have to apologize? France and Britain chose not to enforce Germany’s obligations on March 7, 1936, when Hitler held his breath and remilitarized the Rhineland, in violation of the treaties of Versailles and Locarno. Calling the 48 hours after his three battalions entered the Rhineland “the most nerve-wracking” of his life, Hitler said: “If the French had marched into the Rhineland we would have had to withdraw with our tails between our legs.” France and Britain shrank from supporting Czechoslovakia during the 1938 crisis over the Sudetenland. Hitler finally met military resistance in September 1939. The following five years confirmed Douglas McArthur’s axiom that all military disasters are explained by two words: “Too late.” Too late in discerning threats, too late in countering them. It took terrorist attacks to galvanize the Bush administration. But even without the attacks, it would have been justified in preparing, as Tuesday’s Los Angeles Times reported, to implement the policy Bush foreshadowed as a candidate. The Times says the military buildup around Iraq included weaponry and supplies for the 30,000 troops already in the region, and that 150,000 fully equipped troops “could be routed to the region well before Christmas.” In addition to signing “big contracts for commercial air and sea cargo space,” the military has “bought and built more, faster and better ships and aircraft – enough to cut by more than two-thirds the time it should take to deploy a large military force to Iraq.” Such measures are a prudent response to McArthur’s axiom. There is an interesting twist to this. Germany recently (September, 2002) re-elected Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder on a platform which strongly promised that Germany would not ally itself in a war against Iraq, led by the United States. Germany, one of our very strongest allies over the years after World War 11, has rarely not sided with the US in important international issues. Germany, for example, bombed Belgrade during the war over Kosovo. Why the change? Germany is becoming more confident as it moves father and father away in time and memory from the Holocaust. Whole generations have since lived without having a direct connection to the Nazi past, albeit as part of a history course in high school. We all too often here young people say: “I did not live at that horrific time, why blame me.” Thus many young Germans are pacifist who abhor war. A justice minister recently made the inappropriate analogy of comparing American policy in Iraq to Hitler’s rape of humanity. This would not have been possible 20 or even 10 years ago. To be sure the analogy was very tactless, but the minister wanted to make a point about the new Germany. What do you think the objective of this statement was? Here is one answer: American-style democracy is so imbedded in German society today and it is a unified country (thanks to US support for unification) that, having successfully taught the Germans not to follow any other Fuehrer blindly, they are also not willing to follow another leader—even American President George W. Bush— blindly.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 14 April 2014 18:05 (eleven years ago)
I know he recanted later (how convenient) would prefer he'd been hanged
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 14 April 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
Liberalism hasn't had a new idea since the 1960s except ObamaCare
rong
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 14 April 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)
george will's continued relevance is evidence that savvy writing and networking skills can sustain you even after your analytical and predictive skills have been exposed as acutely lacking.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 14 April 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)
He's not a good writer though! His prose is a repository of solecisms and tags of erudition.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 14 April 2014 19:41 (eleven years ago)
sounds familiar
― waterbabies (waterface), Monday, 14 April 2014 19:47 (eleven years ago)
yeah afaict the only thing that distinguishes Will from his other peers in the right wing blogosphere is his penchant for peppering his screeds with classical references
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 14 April 2014 19:50 (eleven years ago)
there's a moment in that Watergate novel where Elliot Richardson reads a 1974 Will column and starts sketching an owl. Presumably a constipated one.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 April 2014 19:50 (eleven years ago)
the blood moon rises over the kenyan captivity
http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/move-over-obama-the-pen-and-phone-that-really-count/
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 15 April 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)
Lots of "Blood Moon" stuff going on:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/blood-moon-sets-off-apocalyptic-debate-among-some-christians/2014/04/15/00b76502-c4be-11e3-9ee7-02c1e10a03f0_story.html?hpid=z3
“Four Blood Moons: Something Is About to Change” by Texas megachurch pastor John Hagee.
Hagee’s book is drawing the most attention, with his book now No. 4 on The New York Times best-seller list in the advice/how to section, and No. 80 on USA Today’s best-seller list. The book by the controversial 74-year-old founder of San Antonio’s Cornerstone Church has also spent 152 days in Amazon’s top 100 books.
In his book, Hagee says something will happen to the nation of Israel due to the tetrad. The four eclipses occur on April 15 and Oct. 8, 2014, and April 4 and Sept. 28 next year. The ones in April occur during Passover, and the ones in October occur during the Jewish Feast of Tabernacles.
...
This time, Hagee suggests that a Rapture will occur where Christians will be taken to heaven, Israel will go to war in a great battle called Armageddon, and Jesus will return to earth. Hagee planned a special televised event on Tuesday (April 15) on the Global Evangelism Television channel.
But NASA does not consider tetrads as especially rare, saying in a statement that there will be eight sets of tetrads before the year 2100. The most unique thing about the upcoming tetrad is that they are visible from all or parts of the United States, NASA stated.
A publicist for Hagee said the pastor was not available for an interview.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:07 (eleven years ago)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2014/04/15/turn-around-bright-eyes-something-is-about-to-change/
...I’m less impressed than Hagee is with the prophetic significance of a lunar eclipse in April coinciding with Passover. Lunar eclipses only occur when there’s a full moon. And Passover starts with, yes, the full moon.Hagee’s “prophecy” also seems a bit parochial. Yes, tonight’s lunar eclipse will be visible in San Antonio — throughout most of North and South America, in Australia and in the Far East — but you know where it won’t be visible? Jerusalem. Over there in Bible Prophecy Central, the sun will be shining. That’s how lunar eclipses work — they only appear in the parts of the Earth where it’s nighttime.That’s an inconvenient fact for anyone attempting to glean some global prophecy based on the appearance of a lunar eclipse. Lunar eclipses can’t be global. Perhaps, then, this series of lunar eclipses in 2014-2015 doesn’t mean the End of the World, but only the end of San Antonio...
Hagee’s “prophecy” also seems a bit parochial. Yes, tonight’s lunar eclipse will be visible in San Antonio — throughout most of North and South America, in Australia and in the Far East — but you know where it won’t be visible? Jerusalem. Over there in Bible Prophecy Central, the sun will be shining. That’s how lunar eclipses work — they only appear in the parts of the Earth where it’s nighttime.
That’s an inconvenient fact for anyone attempting to glean some global prophecy based on the appearance of a lunar eclipse. Lunar eclipses can’t be global. Perhaps, then, this series of lunar eclipses in 2014-2015 doesn’t mean the End of the World, but only the end of San Antonio...
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:19 (eleven years ago)
that eviction article is really interesting and also kinda over my head i have to admit
― Nhex, Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
But what about the prophesizing skills of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee?
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=850B9DB2-5098-4F9F-9622-880DA0EB5EDC
Vulnerable Democrats wait out Obamacare hitsBy: Manu RajuApril 11, 2014 05:03 AM EDT Conservative outside groups have pummeled Senate Democrats over their support for Obamacare, spending millions on attack ads from Louisiana to Montana.
But many of the most endangered Democratic incumbents have decided it’s better to wait out the barrage than to respond in-kind.
They’re gambling that it makes far more sense to build a sizable war chest and hold off until closer to the election to engage their opponents in an expensive TV war. The idea: Absorb the ads from the conservative group Americans for Prosperity now and hope some help from their Democratic allies, like the Senate Majority PAC, helps to keep their races competitive. Then, when the time comes, unleash a flurry of attacks that will give them a late bounce and potentially victory come November.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 15 April 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
Mark Pryor is holding his own, it looks like.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 15 April 2014 21:04 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/15/the-ideological-middle-in-congress-is-dead-so-who-killed-it/
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 April 2014 00:23 (eleven years ago)
J.D., did you just give Cillizza a hit
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 April 2014 00:35 (eleven years ago)
lol, i didn't even look at the byline! it stood out because it had an instantly graspable and kinda useful chart -- usually charts of any kind in an article make me start scrolling frantically.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 16 April 2014 00:46 (eleven years ago)
those quotes from the nevada constitution are pretty funny
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/04/the-irony-of-cliven-bundys-unconstitutional-stand/360587/
― goole, Wednesday, 16 April 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
oh man this is gonna be fun
Mrs. Clinton has scrupulously avoided publicly criticizing Mr. Obama; White House aides said he still called her for advice. And much of the administration’s foreign policy still bears her imprint, like the Iran sanctions and a more confrontational stance toward China, which she pioneered and Mr. Obama has embraced.
But in recent interviews, two dozen current and former administration officials, foreign diplomats, friends and outside analysts described Mrs. Clinton as almost always the advocate of the most aggressive actions considered by Mr. Obama’s national security team — and not just in well-documented cases, like the debate over how many additional American troops to send to Afghanistan or the NATO airstrikes in Libya.
Mrs. Clinton’s advocates — a swelling number in Washington, where people are already looking to the next administration — are quick to cite other cases in which she took more hawkish positions than the White House: arguing for funneling weapons to Syrian rebels and for leaving more troops behind in postwar Iraq, and criticizing the results of a 2011 parliamentary election in Russia.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 April 2014 02:39 (eleven years ago)
that's been my impression of mrs clinton. very hawkish.
― Mordy , Thursday, 17 April 2014 02:41 (eleven years ago)
why does anyone like her, again?
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 17 April 2014 02:55 (eleven years ago)
Clinton's prob have tons of friends firmly implanted in the military industrial complex they'd be willing to do favors for
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:25 (eleven years ago)
clintons have it on the brain that they must be hawkish to avoid the accusation of being "weak democrats." far moreso than obama, the clintons represent democrats who were emotionally beaten down by the REAGAN REVOLUTION (you know, because ronald reagan replaced that wimp, and finally stood up for america and defeated communism and made our enemies good and scared because he would personally fly to their country and shoot them straight to blah blah blah).
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:31 (eleven years ago)
all modern presidents gotta bomb the fuck outta someone to prove they have star-spangled gonads
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:40 (eleven years ago)
eh, republicans were heavy anti-intervention during clinton era - critical of kosovo and bosnia involvement (the phrase 'not worth the death of one american' was used alot), dubya praised his handling of rwanda. she's a bit more hawkish than bill was (bill also had somalia happen very early on the job and that may have made him more gunshy, it obv played a factor w/ how he approached rwanda and haiti), some of that may be a kind of overcompensation (not only a weak liberal but a woman!) but everything we've heard of her foreign policy has been fairly consistent w/ the model bill created and is a general mix of samantha powers us proactive enforcer/defender of human rights and full faith and beholdenness to beltway foreign policy cw regarding credibility and other myths. obama's foreign policy is, for better or worse (i'd argue better but i don't think it's a slam dunk), is more (some might say solely) in pragmatism over principle. i know ppl scoffed at that michael lewis profile as fluff but i think it actually provided some insight in literally how obama thinks. despite similarities in terms of moral argument and arguably a greater argument for intervening in syria in terms of realpolitik obama intervenes in libya almost w/o hesitation and strenuously avoids intervening in syria cuz the logistics for intervening in libya were much more favorable than the logistics for intervening in syria. the risk was lower, the likelihood of benefit was higher. he's been pretty consistent in this approach going back to his opposition to invading iraq; he didn't oppose it cuz it was an evil war, he opposed it cuz it was a dumb war. he's eisenhower, w/ a similar weakness for simple, risk free if dirty solutions (cia for ike, drones for obama). hillary would have had us in syria in some capacity (even if only off shore firing tomahawks (or whatever the navy is moving to, god i feel old) or in the skies above it) cuz principle would've demanded it and credibility would've demanded it. not as pronounced but you can see the same disparity in how they approached healthcare.
― balls, Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:59 (eleven years ago)
can't imagine americans will give any more of a damn about foreign policy in 2016 than there was in 2012 or 2008 but i still think there's ground to be won by the gop w/ that kind of paleocon foreign policy. was hoping that rand paul being a legit (compared to his dad at least) factor would create that opportunity, or at least foster actual debate, but so far the only thing that's come of it so far has been paul struggling to 'defend' his 'past' foreign policy positions, like it's the equiv of his dad having david duke write for his zine.
― balls, Thursday, 17 April 2014 04:07 (eleven years ago)
rand paul is a fucking tool
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:07 (eleven years ago)
he's a bigot and a lunatic also but if he's gonna shape the debate better it be cutting aid to egypt than repealing the 14th amendment
― balls, Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:28 (eleven years ago)
shocking that a bigot and a lunatic has not fostered much debate.
*shocked*
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:29 (eleven years ago)
http://www.bet.com/news/features/vote-2012/news/politics/photos/2012/08/ten-iconic-moments-from-past-republican-and-democratic-conventions/_jcr_content/leftcol/flipbook/flipbookimage_7.flipfeature.dimg/082712-politics-rnc-1992-pat-buchanon-culture-wars.jpg
― balls, Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:39 (eleven years ago)
http://media.salon.com/2013/04/ronald_reagan2.jpg
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:40 (eleven years ago)
1964
― balls, Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:42 (eleven years ago)
those were different times
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:43 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/SenRandPaul/status/455501603072933888
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:44 (eleven years ago)
Those famous libertarians, Chumbawamba, uh no wait....
― nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:48 (eleven years ago)
should have gone with Spice Up Your Life imho
― Sufjan Cougar Mellencamp (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:51 (eleven years ago)
If I was ever in a room with Rand Paul and heard him say the words "jam sesh" I'd punch him right in the face without a second's hesitation.
― bi-polar uncle (its OK-he's dead) (Phil D.), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:53 (eleven years ago)
sounds like he'd get up again tho
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:59 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/04/16/states-embracing-obamacare-are-doing-a-better-job-of-covering-the-uninsured-surveys-show/
No surprise here. Republican talking points rewriting this are being incorporated into Koch brothers ads and George Will columns as we speak
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 17 April 2014 14:32 (eleven years ago)
― sleeve, Thursday, 17 April 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
http://www.policymic.com/articles/87719/princeton-concludes-what-kind-of-government-america-really-has-and-it-s-not-a-democracy?utm_source=policymicFB&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social
― waterbabies (waterface), Thursday, 17 April 2014 15:33 (eleven years ago)
^ i saw that too. i feel like this might be a global trend? it would be interesting to see a similar study/methodology applied to other "democracies"
― hug niceman (psychgawsple), Thursday, 17 April 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:46 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I fucking hate this guy so much and hope he is eaten by a Grue
― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Friday, 18 April 2014 05:32 (eleven years ago)
It’s entirely possible that Democrats could put together a midterm election strategy of epic proportions and hit all of their national markers—and still fall short in states like Arkansas and Alaska.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_04/democrats_midterm_challenge049985.php
― curmudgeon, Monday, 21 April 2014 14:02 (eleven years ago)
Charles Pierce's profile of Elizabeth Warren.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 21 April 2014 14:06 (eleven years ago)
the New York Times’ 538-ish substitute subsite “The Upshot” debuts today
http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/senate-model/
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:29 (eleven years ago)
that black-and-white shot of warren looks presidential.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
(not that i'm saying she's running; just sayin')
she shouldn't run imho. she has zero chance of beating Hillary or forcing her to the left afaict.
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:35 (eleven years ago)
maybe sometime in the future, tho.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
I guess if her goal is to become a broader force in the electoral politics of the party as a whole (a la Dean) then she could do it but eh that's not such a great goal imho
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
she could be a contender!, in the future. never, ever did i think there could -- even possibly -- be a democratic presidential dynasty in my lifetime. but could be! obama --> hrc --> warren.
like i said, i'm by no means predicting it. just never even thought it was a conversation that could even be entertained. but gop is unpopular on presidential-level, and often has unlikable or heavily-hampered presidential-nominees.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
shakey otm. i'd rather have someone cool like warren in the senate than yet another doomed presidential also-ran.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
warren might as well be in a different party altogether than the one Obama and Clinton are in though. Obama -> Clinton -> warren doesn't really have a throughline that makes any kind of policy sense, foreign or domestic.
― it's a trilby (Clay), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
yeah but both parties are, to some extent, "big tents." gop, for instance, has a million neocon hawks, and also rand paul.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:45 (eleven years ago)
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.)
I feel like I said this on the board months ago but was mocked for it. Maybe I mistook it for comments about my hair.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:57 (eleven years ago)
your hair is perfect.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/tea-party-candidate-curt-clawson-wins-republican-primary-to-replace-former/2176397
Blurrgh
― Corpsepaint Counterpaint (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 April 2014 03:05 (eleven years ago)
Texans support raising the minimum wage, expanding Medicaid. And by a 50/30 spread, they support the Paycheck Fairness Act. But they also love Ted Cruz
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014/04/ted-cruz-most-popular-in-texas.html#more
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:57 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think that was me, but the premise has changed: i thought the choice was between president warren and senator warren, not embarrassing presidential also-ran warren and senator warren. if we're accepting that no good can come out of her running, then sure, but clearly a president warren would be a lot more effectual than a senator warren, where she's one vote out of 100
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 April 2014 19:47 (eleven years ago)
doomed also-ran campaign could be beneficial to the party, beneficial to the policies she wants to advance, and beneficial to her if it broke right. tbh it would be more beneficial to have her run and be a factor but lose the nomination than to have her win the nomination but lose the general election; the latter would almost definitely lead to diminished influence in the senate and repudiation of her and her politics by the party. the former could promote certain issues and policies in importance (cf 92 w/ kerrey and healthcare and tsongas and the deficit), and if she did well enough it could increase her standing in the senate and nationally. she could become a cross between post-82 ted kennedy and sarah palin (who STILL amazingly somehow can influence senate races). does anyone think it's impossible for rand paul to emerge from 2016 having failed to get the nomination but nonetheless in a stronger position than before he ran? the key difference is that rand paul can poll at 15% in this field and be in second place and the margin between first and second is four points. warren poll at 15% and be in second place and the margin is fifty points. if she's enough of a factor to scare hillary, if she's hart in 84 or reagan in 76 it's a plus for her (though even there you could have ppl blaming her for weakening hillary, costing the dems an easy general election win, who knows), if she's comes out hoping to be obama and ending up kucinich though it marginalizes her and the message sent to the establishment is that whatever gains made by the progressive wing in 2006 and 2008 were a blip due to bush and the wars and in 2016 the grownups are safely in charge again. i'd like to think there's a considerable base of dem voters that are hillary skeptics and don't want to see the party veer towards clintonism again, that it might instead keep...progressing on the path of the past ~10 years instead of regressing but i don't really think that's the case, i think by and large ppl are ready for hillary. this is disregarding whether even if there was a pocket of resistance whether warren has the skills as a pol to successfully exploit it.
― balls, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 21:46 (eleven years ago)
Obama is on an Asian tour now pushing for a Pacific trade agreement that he and Clinton like, but which others oppose:
A belief that most Americans will not benefit from this trade agreement is one of the biggest arguments against the TPP. A recent study from the liberal-leaning Center for Economic and Policy Research predicts that 90 percent of workers in the United States would see a decrease in real wages under the TPP. CEPR also asserts that cumulative GDP gains in the United States won't be much more than 0.13 percent by 2025 -- not much more than a rounding error.Democratic Reps. George Miller (Calif.), Rosa DeLauro (Conn.) and Louise Slaughter (N.Y.) wrote an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times this week lambasting the effect the TPP could have on middle class Americans, saying "this agreement would force Americans to compete against workers from nations such as Vietnam, where the minimum wage is $2.75 a day. It threatens to roll back financial regulation, environmental standards and U.S. laws that protect the safety of drugs we take, food we eat and toys we give our children. It would create binding policies on countless subjects, so that Congress and state legislatures would be thwarted from mitigating the pact's damage."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/23/why-almost-everyone-hates-the-trade-deal-obamas-negotiating-in-japan/
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 April 2014 00:46 (eleven years ago)
The Neo-Con W. Post editorial board likes the trade deal, of course
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:24 (eleven years ago)
If yer to the left of the Clintons and expect the Dems to ever be "fixed from within," sorry chump. The next president elected will likely be the last I see, and 50 years from now it won't make one little fuck of a difference.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:46 (eleven years ago)
Didn't you say that in 2006?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:00 (eleven years ago)
will likely be the last I see
are you being dramatic?
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:02 (eleven years ago)
no, diagnostic
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:05 (eleven years ago)
wow. i'm very sorry to read that.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:07 (eleven years ago)
:(
― smhphony orchestra (crüt), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:11 (eleven years ago)
physician heal thyself
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:34 (eleven years ago)
well, i'm assuming we're stuck with 8-year presidencies here, given the last three shits.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:35 (eleven years ago)
You can outlast 'em
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:37 (eleven years ago)
guys, Morbs is like 70. He's not Methuselah.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:38 (eleven years ago)
i'll try to time a visit to Miami the next time my hair falls out, you Fiennes-hater.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:41 (eleven years ago)
don't scoff; you'll like it here. warm, year-round.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/25/opinion/creating-a-two-speed-internet.html?emc=edit_th_20140425&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=31119931
Obama's FCC chair's new proposal is not exactly progressive
― curmudgeon, Friday, 25 April 2014 12:20 (eleven years ago)
Reacting to that Nevada rancher dude, my friend dug up this great old clip of "Murphy Brown," which is distressingly timely, despite being 20 years old:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0-FWweJLRc#t=342
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 April 2014 13:49 (eleven years ago)
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117516/fccs-new-rules-show-obama-has-not-kept-net-neutrality-promise
More on the FCC proposal I mentioned x-post.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 26 April 2014 13:05 (eleven years ago)
Santorum: "we don't believe there are social or economic classes in America."
ok, i had him all wrong. rick santorum is a comedy genius
― Karl Malone, Monday, 28 April 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
those in poverty are just like rich people, their lack of food and clothing is an artistic means of expression!
― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Monday, 28 April 2014 19:30 (eleven years ago)
rightwing conception of class is closer to Indian caste system. they see wealth as the ladder that gives everyone the ability to move up and down over the course of your lifetime and since everyone has equal access under the law to as much wealth as they can acquire voila equality
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 28 April 2014 19:36 (eleven years ago)
and if you say they don't have equal access under the law you are a whiner and nitpicker everyone can overcome adversity if they try hard enough etc
but even that, a boneheaded vision of american life where it's very easy to transcend class, still relies on the idea that there are classes. to say "we don't believe there are social or economic classes" is just so fucking stupid it's unbelievable
― Karl Malone, Monday, 28 April 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
^^^ totally, but this is not so much stupid as dogwhistle stuff, which his followers love, which says if you do believe there are classes, then you are trying to redistribute the wealth.
Who's gonna mow their lawns when everyone has overcome adversity and become an investment banker, is what I wanna know?
― A Perfect Ratio of Choogle to Jam (Dan Peterson), Monday, 28 April 2014 19:45 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_04/issenberg_on_the_the_two_elect050093.php
More on how Dems should try to get folks to come out and vote in mid-terms
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 29 April 2014 13:44 (eleven years ago)
it's shit like that santorum quote that makes me really not look forward to the next election
― building a desert (art), Tuesday, 29 April 2014 13:54 (eleven years ago)
vision of american life where it's very easy to transcend class, still relies on the idea that there are classes
they consider class as, by definition, a fixed state - if its not a fixed state, it's not a class
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 April 2014 15:54 (eleven years ago)
lol @ GOP still chasing this Benghazi thing
― PLATYPUS OF DOOM (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 April 2014 21:01 (eleven years ago)
long may it continue
― anonanon, Tuesday, 29 April 2014 21:22 (eleven years ago)
paul/benghazi '16
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 04:05 (eleven years ago)
so proud of the GOP for blocking the minimum wage increase, way to stand up to the poor (finally!)
― PLATYPUS OF DOOM (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:01 (eleven years ago)
otm. business owners are going to have a hell of a time staying afloat if they merely kowtow to the demands of a few million impoverished econo-terrorists. In fact I think there should be a MAXIMUM wage.
― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
agreed
― idontknowanythingabouttechnlolgeez (waterface), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:21 (eleven years ago)
that's class warfare!
― PLATYPUS OF DOOM (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
Make that a MAXIMUM INCOME instead of just a MAXIMUM WAGE and I will sign on, too. Most folks could scrape by on, oh let's say, $10 million per annum - just to kick out a nice round number.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 30 April 2014 22:09 (eleven years ago)
yeah but we gotta make sure the 'right' people make that kind of salary. don't want every Dick and Jane wearing the same watch as me y'know?
― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 22:32 (eleven years ago)
meh, let people make as much as they want, just make them pay their damn taxes
― anonanon, Wednesday, 30 April 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
Why should we penalize our best pplz
― getting strange ass all around the globe (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:23 (eleven years ago)
There used to be a particular bugbear among aristocrats, known as a "leveler", a person who believed that hereditary privilege was antithetical to a good and just society. Now we have plutocrats, and their bugbear is "income redistributors".
― Aimless, Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:52 (eleven years ago)
I guess this sort of thing is cool if your party has no interest in black people voting for you ever again but holy shit this is amazingly obtuse and also the exact fucking thing clive bundy said last week when people shit their pants
A Fox News analyst on Thursday compared President Obama's policies and government benefits to slavery.During a segment on whether Obama's second term is at a "dead point," a term used by Abraham Lincoln, Fox's Angela McGlowan began to discuss slavery.“With Lincoln and Barack Obama you do have a slave mentality today. Even though we had the LBJ Great Society, we have a people enslaved on the government dole," McGlowan said. "We have people paying for people to have more kids out of wedlock, paying for more people to go to prison, instead of getting a job.""So we do have a problem with slavery today, as Lincoln did back in the day. Even with LBJ’s policies, because you have certain people that want Obama-phones, free phones, free food stamps, and the whole nine yards," she continued, citing a discredited story that Obama started a program to provide free phones to low-income Americans.
During a segment on whether Obama's second term is at a "dead point," a term used by Abraham Lincoln, Fox's Angela McGlowan began to discuss slavery.
“With Lincoln and Barack Obama you do have a slave mentality today. Even though we had the LBJ Great Society, we have a people enslaved on the government dole," McGlowan said. "We have people paying for people to have more kids out of wedlock, paying for more people to go to prison, instead of getting a job."
"So we do have a problem with slavery today, as Lincoln did back in the day. Even with LBJ’s policies, because you have certain people that want Obama-phones, free phones, free food stamps, and the whole nine yards," she continued, citing a discredited story that Obama started a program to provide free phones to low-income Americans.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 2 May 2014 00:10 (eleven years ago)
Countdown to Hannity disavowing this in 3,2,1....
― lauded at conferences of deluded psychopaths (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 2 May 2014 00:22 (eleven years ago)
have always been kinda amused/annoyed at the weird syntax used by ppl who blather on TV for a living, where every other sentence has 'you have' or 'you get' or 'we do have,' regardless of actual content.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 2 May 2014 00:29 (eleven years ago)
Tim Reynolds @ByTimReynolds 1h -- Obama tells Fox News "You'll hate me when I'm gone. It'll be harder to convince the American people that Hillary was born in Kenya."
genuine lol.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 4 May 2014 02:31 (eleven years ago)
Joel McHale flailing hard
― I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Sunday, 4 May 2014 02:57 (eleven years ago)
Chris Hayes is a lesbian lol lol
fuck you
what?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 4 May 2014 02:58 (eleven years ago)
White House Correspondents Dinner streaming
― I got the glares, the mutterings, the snarls (President Keyes), Sunday, 4 May 2014 03:01 (eleven years ago)
ah.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 4 May 2014 03:02 (eleven years ago)
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 4 May 2014 22:54 (eleven years ago)
cutesy Biden & Julia L-Dreyfus footage of them hangin in the Oval office and eating ice cream until Michelle walks in and such right before the dinner, getting shared all over on Facebook.
O with the NSA and Obamacare humor at the event; plus his reference to Boehner getting grief from Boehner's own caucus proves "Orange is the new Black" .....
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 14:14 (eleven years ago)
Since it was a fundraiser, I wonder if Netflix paid for that product placement?
― epoxy fule (Aimless), Monday, 5 May 2014 14:46 (eleven years ago)
really, "where is Al Qaeda when you need them" wd be a v tasteless question to ask
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 May 2014 14:48 (eleven years ago)
Proceeds from the White House Correspondents’ Association annual dinner go toward scholarships and awards that recognize aspiring and accomplished journalists.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 14:50 (eleven years ago)
so many future Russerts
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 5 May 2014 14:53 (eleven years ago)
here's the latest on uh "journalist" Lara Logan and her Benghazi report on 60 Minutes
http://nymag.com/news/features/lara-logan-cbs-news-2014-5/
After defending the report for more than a week, Logan was forced to apologize and later take an indefinite leave of absence while CBS conducted an internal inquiry. Her colleagues, including veteran CBS correspondents Steve Kroft and Bob Simon, were apoplectic about the damage to 60 Minutes’ reputation. Morley Safer, the only founding member of the cast left on the 45-year-old program, went into the office of CBS News chairman and 60 Minutes executive producer Jeff Fager’s office last fall and demanded that he fire Logan.
But Fager (who declined to comment for this story) refused. Instead, he said that Logan will return sometime this year. His decision sent a ripple of discontent through CBS News, prompting questions about Fager’s judgment. And as the months have rolled on, Logan’s return appears less and less certain.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
wow, i'm super not into how much of that piece goes into her sex life
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 5 May 2014 20:16 (eleven years ago)
benghazi and the bombshell? seriously?
yeah widely commented that the piece goes over the line into sexism
― goole, Monday, 5 May 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
huh, must've missed it.
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 5 May 2014 20:19 (eleven years ago)
ha well 'widely commented' means journos i follow on twitter were saying it was sexist before while linking to it
― goole, Monday, 5 May 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
surprised there wasn't a link to the Gap Band's "You Dropped a Bomb on Me"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 May 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
I haven't read the whole article. Just beginning and end.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 20:24 (eleven years ago)
Comments are fun too. Uh not really
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 20:26 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_05/fundamentalists_enter_election050208.php
Lots of prognosticators re the mid-terms including Washington Post's new "Election Lab" . "Fundamentalists" is a reference to old-school style predicting versus newer statistical approaches
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 May 2014 21:54 (eleven years ago)
“The construction of the Keystone pipeline is very important,” Landrieu, the new chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said late last week. “It is time to stop studying and start building.”
god this fucking committee, why is it always led by morons. total fox-guarding-the-henhouse shit.
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
choose your poison - keystone xl or exploding oil tanker cars rumbling all over the middle of the country
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
you get the foxes you pay for
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
let's just blow up Canada, problem solved
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
if you could somehow ignite the tar sands would canada be on fire forever?
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
Rob Ford's crack pipe might light that prairie fire.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
Shakey why do you want to stifle the positive economic benefits and job creation that comes from cleaning up oil spills?
― Diddley Hollyberry (Phil D.), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
I'm against jobs. the less people work, the less GHG emissions there are.
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:02 (eleven years ago)
weigel pretty convinced if gop takes senate they will impeach obama over benghazi
― balls, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
I would be persuaded if I wasn't convinced that by doing so the GOP has ensured HRC wil win in '16 in FDR-esque proportions.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
lol I don't think they'll be able to move quite that quickly
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
And that’s also why the backup from Fox News matters, and why more conservatives will join the discussion. Next month the attorney and National Review columnist Andrew McCarthy will publish Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment. “There is a rich legal case,” writes McCarthy, “but impeachment is not about what the law allows. Impeachment is a matter of political will.”
and the... triumph thereof?
i know, sorry sorry
― goole, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:17 (eleven years ago)
my cool edgy opinion is that benghazi is not a a scandal but libya as a whole definitely is
"regime change on the cheap" turns out to be about as dumb an idea as doing it the expensive way. i'm surprised to find myself ending up at a kissingerite stability uber alles kind of position, but it's more like, do no harm, can we? for once?
― goole, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:26 (eleven years ago)
http://fortunewallstreet.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/henry_kissinger.jpg
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:26 (eleven years ago)
I just cant see how americans can get behind impeaching a president over how to properly spin an issue on a sunday morning talk show. fucking ridiculous.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:29 (eleven years ago)
yeah but the wingers still think it's about watching marines die on a live video feed while cackling or some shit
― anonanon, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:30 (eleven years ago)
goole otm. seeing the way libya's turned out has made me all the more glad we didn't go into syria.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:32 (eleven years ago)
BENGHAZI!
http://conservativetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/trey-gowdy.jpg
Seriously dreading seeing this toad on my TV 24/7
― A Perfect Ratio of Choogle to Jam (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
in what world did Kissinger do no harm
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
yeah, goole, not a great example
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
sweep the leg, gowdy
― goole, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:36 (eleven years ago)
I couldn't see why Democrats wouldn't impeach a president who couldn't properly spin an intelligence failure that resulted in three thousand American deaths, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and the collapse of American prestige that will last decades, but, hey, these Dems still in office won't say this often enough.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:36 (eleven years ago)
my post was not made with the proper nuance, i apologize to any who were offended
― goole, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:39 (eleven years ago)
It lacked detente, you might say
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
shrill ass mothafucka
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 21:43 (eleven years ago)
good Jane Mayer article on Reagan/Lebanon vs. Benghazi, the Reagan quote she ends with is pretty remarkable
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/05/ronald-reagans-benghazi.html
― anonanon, Tuesday, 6 May 2014 22:51 (eleven years ago)
what is it with Republicans and home improvement metaphors (Pottery Barn rule etc.)
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 23:14 (eleven years ago)
I haven't read that story yet but it should be noted that after Tip O'Neill and the Democrats gave him (reluctant) support for the occupation and still stood by him after the deaths of the Marines, Reagan said, "He may be ready to surrender, but I'm not" and pulled out in a shameful, ignominious way shortly thereafter.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 23:18 (eleven years ago)
Piketty has laid bare America's gross economic inequality, but don't expect Democrats' faithy enablers to act
...One small problem with the Brooks “unifying uplift” formula: it is by no means “historically proven” that what he calls ”human capital” reforms do anything substantial to mitigate wealth concentration. As far back as 1971, sociologists Ivar Berg and Sherry Gorelick published a devastating critique of the human capital approach under the title The Great Training Robbery. No one has ever successfully refuted that book’s demolition of the notion that we can solve social inequality by sending educational ladders down to the deserving poor....
But here’s a much more serious problem than the widespread acceptance of the Brooks formula by rattled conservatives and centrists. To wit: the “uplift” formula is also embraced by much of the so-called Left: by the Washington think tanks and pundits aligned with the Democratic Party and (most depressingly, for me) by many bien pensant progressive religious leaders in the U.S.
These religious progressives include some who rallied belatedly to the Occupy banner but who did so merely as a gesture of faux solidarity with those whose livelihoods and prospect of rising were shattered by the financial crisis. They include faith leaders who have so prostituted themselves to a wealth-colonized Democratic Party that when the White House says “jump!” their only response is to say “how high?”
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/08/can_piketty_inspire_religious_progressives_partner/
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 May 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
can someone refresh my memory about what law was purportedly broken in this benghazi thing
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 May 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
PRECIOUS AMERICAN BLOOD WAS SPILLED DO U SEE
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
you mean like al-awlaki's blood?
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:15 (eleven years ago)
certainly american but let's not be too hasty w/ the precious part
― Mordy, Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:16 (eleven years ago)
xps sure I've got the cite right here
See generally U.S. Const.
― anonanon, Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:24 (eleven years ago)
lol @ "conservative" PACs spending $3 attacking Republicans for every $1 attacking Democrats
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/05/08/14732/gop-civil-war-rages-senate-primary-battles
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:48 (eleven years ago)
money down the drain by the looks of it
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:48 (eleven years ago)
So it looks like the next three years will reprise the nineties.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 May 2014 16:50 (eleven years ago)
I was told by Eric Cantor that all american blood is precious and sacred and if Hillary could drink it she would
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 8 May 2014 17:57 (eleven years ago)
if i didn't know any better i'd figure the benghazi thing is mostly about smearing hillary to even the 2016 playing field with chris "bridgegate" christie. but it's about the cover up. worse than watergate
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 8 May 2014 20:33 (eleven years ago)
Worse than Watergate©. good phrase.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 8 May 2014 20:35 (eleven years ago)
Obama's trial coming soon:
Asked by MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough about the possibility that his panel’s work would continue into the 2016 election campaign, Gowdy replied that “if an administration is slow-walking document production, I can’t end a trial simply because the defense won’t cooperate.”
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_05/placating_the_base_with_show_t050264.php
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 May 2014 22:27 (eleven years ago)
Oh man, I needed a new dn, thanks.
― wild-eyed, high-volume bursts of pious indignation (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 8 May 2014 22:30 (eleven years ago)
"slow-walking"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 May 2014 22:34 (eleven years ago)
the hyphenates created by Washington insiders
half-stepping
― Hunt3r, Thursday, 8 May 2014 23:07 (eleven years ago)
grab-assing
― stadow shevens (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 May 2014 23:09 (eleven years ago)
privilege-checking
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 8 May 2014 23:25 (eleven years ago)
granting that both parties are "big tents," it still is, in some ways, extraordinary that mitt romney got the last gop nomination.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 9 May 2014 23:52 (eleven years ago)
i don't remember him mentioning a minimum wage raise during the campaign. if he did, he certainly didn't tout it
― Mordy, Friday, 9 May 2014 23:55 (eleven years ago)
he didn't. it just contributes to the overall picture of a candidate who was, in his heart, far less of a conservative than the image he was forced to project. and that was kind of obvious, at the time.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 9 May 2014 23:57 (eleven years ago)
i'm sure there's a more appropriate educational thread for this diane ravitch post, but it's booming imho:http://dianeravitch.net/2014/05/02/my-reply-to-alexander-nazaryan-of-newsweek/ (thx to salon who reposted it today w/ a terrible headline)
― Mordy, Saturday, 10 May 2014 00:09 (eleven years ago)
I posted that excellent response in the Common Core thread.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 May 2014 00:15 (eleven years ago)
Michelle Obama and liberals more concerned about Nigerian girls than they are about Americans who died in Benghazi say right-wingers...blah blah blah
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/laura-ingraham-nigeria-kidnapping-benghazi
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 10 May 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
boehner better watch his back
http://www.630wpro.com/common/more.php?m=58&ts=1399719002&article=04D8D9FCD7DD11E3B51EFEFDADE6840A&mode=2
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 11 May 2014 11:52 (eleven years ago)
like or hate his politics, that's scary and terrible. glad they got to this thompson before something terrible happened.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 11 May 2014 11:59 (eleven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BnXmuj4IIAAinQF.png:large
― famous instagram Dog (Karl Malone), Sunday, 11 May 2014 17:25 (eleven years ago)
Daniel, we're doomed: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/08/us/florida-finds-itself-in-the-eye-of-the-storm-on-climate-change.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 May 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
don't i know it.
http://media.tumblr.com/cfe0c91f7f86a8d5f5c431d8c8db294d/tumblr_inline_mop2zgBvxU1qz4rgp.gif
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 11 May 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
the measures taken by local mayors, discussed in the article, are laudable, but so irrelevant compared to the problem.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 11 May 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
Because politics is the only venue able to restructure society broadly enough to be effective, local political efforts aren't entirely irrelevant, even if the actions themselves are futile.
― epoxy fule (Aimless), Sunday, 11 May 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
i'm sure this has been linked-to before, but the current issue of rolling stone has a good article about how president obama is doing an end-run around congress to enact a much more proactive set of policies against climate change.
so maybe we're not doomed down here in miami, after all?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Sunday, 11 May 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
Benghazi is clearly more important to the House than climate change and here's who's gonna be in charge of the the trial, I mean the panel, in the House:
the heretofore obscure second-term Tea Party congressman from South Carolina
There are a lot of these videos of Gowdy in congressional hearings, posted by conservatives, with titles like "Gowdy DESTROYS Obama Admin Stooge!" He's obviously very popular among the base. To call Gowdy prosecutorial would be an understatement. Uniformly angry and outraged, these videos show Gowdy always seemingly on the verge of shouting, he's so damn mad. Like any good lawyer, he never asks a question to which he doesn't already know the answer. But when a witness gives him an answer other than the one he expects, he repeats his question at a slightly louder volume and angrier pitch, as though the question hadn't actually been answered.
http://prospect.org/article/meet-trey-gowdy-gop-benghazi-attack-dog
― curmudgeon, Monday, 12 May 2014 17:41 (eleven years ago)
btw why does DNC email spam now always feature subject lines like "DISASTER" or "BAD NEWS"? Their consultants really are ridin' that alarm horse.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 12 May 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
Elizabeth Warren blogs about Trey Gowdy:
I know a little bit about the way Trey Gowdy pursues oversight. I was on the other end of it when I was setting up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and I was called to testify before the House. As the Huffington Post reported at the time, Gowdy's interrogation of me "seemed to lack the basic facts" about the agency he was attempting to oversee. I'd like you to read their reporting on one of these exchanges just so you know what this Benghazi "investigation" is likely to look like:
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) grilled Warren on whether the bureau would make public the complaints it gets. She answered that the complaint issue was a work in progress, but that at the very least, there was progress in creating a system for large credit card companies."Are any of the complaints public?" Gowdy demanded."Congressman, we don't have any complaints yet," Warren said of the still-nascent agency. "What we're trying to do is build the system."Gowdy also seemed to think that Warren had written the Dodd-Frank law, and he was determined to know what Warren meant by defining "abusive" practices as something that "materially interferes" with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or a condition."That suggests to me that some interferences are immaterial. Is that what you meant by that?" he asked a momentarily perplexed-looking Warren."Congressman, I believe the language you are quoting is out of the Dodd-Frank act," she said. "This is the language that Congress has adopted."Still, Gowdy insisted on her answer, although the definitions and regulations required by the law are still being written.
"Are any of the complaints public?" Gowdy demanded.
"Congressman, we don't have any complaints yet," Warren said of the still-nascent agency. "What we're trying to do is build the system."
Gowdy also seemed to think that Warren had written the Dodd-Frank law, and he was determined to know what Warren meant by defining "abusive" practices as something that "materially interferes" with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or a condition.
"That suggests to me that some interferences are immaterial. Is that what you meant by that?" he asked a momentarily perplexed-looking Warren.
"Congressman, I believe the language you are quoting is out of the Dodd-Frank act," she said. "This is the language that Congress has adopted."
Still, Gowdy insisted on her answer, although the definitions and regulations required by the law are still being written.
As a Senator, I take oversight seriously because it is powerfully important. But Trey Gowdy gives oversight a bad name. The House GOP is on a waste-of-time-and-resources witch hunt and fundraising sideshow, shamefully grasping for any straw to make President Obama, former Secretary Clinton, or Secretary Kerry look bad. This stunt does a disservice to those who serve our country abroad, and it distracts us from issues we should be taking up on behalf of the American people.
With millions of people still out of work and millions more working full time yet still living below the poverty line, with students drowning in debt, with roads and bridges crumbling, is this really what the House Republicans are choosing to spend their time on? Even for guys who have so few solutions to offer that they have voted 54 times to repeal Obamacare, this is a new low.
― Diddley Hollyberry (Phil D.), Monday, 12 May 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
i'm sure gowdy's a clown, but i'm not sure warren's criticism is on-target. it seems fair for a legislator to ask a new bureau-head questions about how the bureau will be run. it's a fair answer to say the procedure hasn't been established yet, but that narrows the criticism to gowdy's inability, thereafter, to let the matter go. and while congress defines statutory terms, agencies (and, i suppose, bureaus) craft the regulations that really matter. so while his phrasing is awkward, gowdy might legitimately ask warren what she thinks constitutes conditions that "materially interfere" with a consumer's ability to understand a term or condition. her bureau may be charged with interpreting that statutory term.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 12 May 2014 18:31 (eleven years ago)
http://www.vox.com/2014/5/8/5694826/this-summer-will-change-the-internet-and-media-forever
On the FCC neutrality issue, it's unfortunate the Prez has not shown more interest in what his former lobbyist head of the FCC is up to (or maybe he has, and he's in agreement). The Comcast-Time Warner merger issue involves Holder's interpretation of antitrust law...
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 14:45 (eleven years ago)
congressional hearings aren't legit q&a's tho.. theyre stage managed soap boxes for loudmouth idiot politicians to score points either back home or with their base. they could give a shit as to what the witness' answers actually are.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 16:46 (eleven years ago)
generally (and, i'm sure, in this case), i agree.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 17:19 (eleven years ago)
Friends from home posted a link on fb that says Sarah Palin is the speaker at a local high school commencement. Not a university or small private college. A high school! In semi-rural Alabama.
How the mighty have fallen.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
Bringing her message to the real Americans, not those fancy liberal academic types
― joygoat, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
party that didn't prevent 9/11 and never caught bin laden or found saddam's WMD demands a trial to know why no one's been arrested over a year after BENGHAZI##################
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i4tuuy1jsw
death panels!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 13 May 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
Karl Rove on Hillary Clinton: ‘Of course she doesn’t have brain damage’
haha this guy
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:15 (eleven years ago)
so is clay aiken gonna win or what
― goole, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:18 (eleven years ago)
or nawt . . .
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
he didn't even win Idol, despite every report I've heard calling him a "Former American Idol winner"
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 13:13 (eleven years ago)
flipping the First Bullshitter's message on Cause of the Month
http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder/people-are-turning-michelle-obamas-bringbackourgirls-pic-int
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
thx anne
― balls, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 20:03 (eleven years ago)
more rubio lols - http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/marco-rubio-abortion-climate-change-106691.html
― balls, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 22:53 (eleven years ago)
I'll show him evisceration
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 22:55 (eleven years ago)
I hereby refer my rejection of all science to a semantic argument over what the word 'life' is
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:01 (eleven years ago)
the headline (Marco Rubio cites abortion to defend climate comments) brings to mind a terrible incident with my dad when i briefly lived in colorado. we were walking on some touristy mountain, on a path, and my dad stepped off the path for a second, onto some moss, ignoring all the signs not to do that. someone from a passing car yelled out "stay on the path" and my dad's face went red and he tensed up, and immediately launched into a tirade about her that concluded "that's the same kind of person who will go and get an abortion". so weird, and i just wanted to drink and pass out immediately. i think i've told that story before on here but hey, how often will the climate/abortion comparison come up
“You’ll have a tornado somewhere or a drought and you’ll have the president or his supporters show up and say: ‘This is happening because of climate change,’” Rubio said. “As if to imply that if we eviscerate our economy by imposing cap-and-trade, these things will stop happening. That’s ridiculous.”
he's right, that's ridiculous. no one is saying climate change would be stopped by cap-and-trade. it's already too late to stop it from happening.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:02 (eleven years ago)
It's totally cool to keep eviscerating the environment. Just not the economy.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:13 (eleven years ago)
People talk about it from time to time, but not on a big enough stage and not often enough for my liking. The reason all these clowns don't care about environmental protection is because they think Jesus is coming back out of the sky to get them. That's it. And it's fucked up that we're already seeing irreversible change over some story they were told when they were a toddler.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:20 (eleven years ago)
Is Jesus going to be handing out gold stars to the people who demonstrate the most apathy toward the planet?
― nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:44 (eleven years ago)
I don't think he would be the biggest fan of the Republican platform.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:49 (eleven years ago)
because they think Jesus is coming back out of the sky to get them. Except that all the Chiliasts still have to live on Earth for a thousand years - kinda fucked if it's a stinking wasteland surrounded by a cesspool.
Yaweh's promise not to unleash another flood and the part of Genesis where He gives mankind dominion over the Earth are generally interpreted as meaning that God won't let the planet go down in flames. Maybe he's just napping...
― Griðian and friðian and takin' the piðian (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 May 2014 23:58 (eleven years ago)
And yet Jesus constantly going on about helping the poor and fighting against the idolatry of money is just in one ear and out the other.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:02 (eleven years ago)
They don't believe any of that stuff, they are just greedy people that want to maintain the status quo. There is no moral/religious/ideological framework beyond gluttony and pride at work there.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:03 (eleven years ago)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
marco rubio doesn't fear Jesus coming to get him. marco rubio fears the koch brothers coming to get him.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:13 (eleven years ago)
by the way, marco rubio is a lightweight, and he has zero -- maybe subzero -- chance of being the gop nominee. when he loses embarrassingly, maybe then he'll begin coming off in a more genuine way, and maybe be worth listening to.
maybe.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:14 (eleven years ago)
http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111031160714/mk_/images/f/f7/Classic_sub_zero.gif
― Mordy, Thursday, 15 May 2014 00:48 (eleven years ago)
=)
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 15 May 2014 03:34 (eleven years ago)
For the average conservative, resistance to climate science is more about knee jerk tribalist opposition than greed or eschatology.
― anonanon, Thursday, 15 May 2014 04:50 (eleven years ago)
fuck the libs and their libtardo "climate science"
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 15 May 2014 05:16 (eleven years ago)
in a nutshell
― anonanon, Thursday, 15 May 2014 05:22 (eleven years ago)
http://prospect.org/article/why-grayson-would-make-perfect-opponent-gowdy-benghazi-committee
^ co-sign
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 15 May 2014 05:47 (eleven years ago)
Anonanon otm re tribalism. It's a disease
― Dan I., Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:50 (eleven years ago)
Plus focusing on polarization of distant Jesus apocalypse vs. distant climate change apocalypse rather than HOLY CRAP THESE COMPANIES ARE POISONING US NOW, DAILY, AND HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR DECADES NOW AND IF ANY SINGLE PERSON HAD DONE THIS THEY WOULD BE CONSIDERED A MASS MURDERER OR AT LEAST PSYCHOPATH THAT NEEDS TO BE LOCKED AWAY FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY. Media complicit in maintaining the distractions.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 15 May 2014 14:54 (eleven years ago)
I would pay 10,000 dollars to watch a debate between rubio and santorum
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 15 May 2014 15:55 (eleven years ago)
you will probably get your wish without having to pay a cent
― anonanon, Thursday, 15 May 2014 16:08 (eleven years ago)
This has some fun moments:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CQlPcwiruaY
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 15 May 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
this has no chance and yet, like many other things that have no chance, I think it's a good idea
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 15 May 2014 18:31 (eleven years ago)
Reid should also do something that I think he has power to do, like over-ruling Leahy and getting rid of the blue slip tradition on judicial nominees
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_05/michael_boggs_and_red_state_bl050347.php#
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 15 May 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
Good news!
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/16/us/politics/reid-to-oppose-obama-nominee-for-federal-court-in-georgia.htmlo
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 May 2014 02:46 (eleven years ago)
That Obama nominee was part of some convoluted blue-slip deal to allow certain other nominees to go forward...
― curmudgeon, Friday, 16 May 2014 14:29 (eleven years ago)
Climate change opposition is, yeah, a mix of tribal resentment/rejection and greed and even the barest shade of Rapture-ready desperate hoping, but you're also working against the fact that it's hard to think in terms of non-direct/systemic causation, rather than simple first-order direct cause & effect.
There's like nine things going on here, and I wish that more people would factor that into their efforts to persuade others that environmental concerns are worth accounting for.
So much of it just seems to fall down into just "well we have them all the facts, why don't they just listen to us, they must be stupid and fuck them" cluelessness by folks who don't want to exert effort or study how to persuade people operating on different basic premises.
I mean, yeah, you're not going to get the loudest, most vocal assholes on TV to switch sides or stop mouthing shibboleths of their authoritarian tribes, but you might nudge more folks into leaning your way.
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Friday, 16 May 2014 15:42 (eleven years ago)
It's all about framing and the left is just as complicit as the right. There are so many immediate dangers to actual people happening now that are glossed over every time we talk about ice sheets in the arctic or rising sea levels in a hundred years or LOL Christians.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
The debate needs to be less "Think of the polar bears" and more "Think of your grandma, the one who got cancer from the local factory pumping their shit into the water supply for 30 years"
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
yeah I've always hated the left's historic emphasis on saving the planet - planet's gonna be fine, it's humanity that people should be worried about saving.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 16 May 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
"Think of your great-grandchildren looking for their next meal."
― WilliamC, Friday, 16 May 2014 16:15 (eleven years ago)
"Think of John McCain, without a Sunday morning talk show to visit"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:16 (eleven years ago)
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, May 16, 2014 5:13 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Think famines.
― famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:26 (eleven years ago)
But that's outside of America.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:28 (eleven years ago)
Unless there is a massive groundswell to hook drones up to deliver bags of flour and rice it's not a concern.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:29 (eleven years ago)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-15/meat-prices-surge-most-11-years
― famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
ok then food inflation
and people* freaking out b/c they have to eat beans and rice
*red blooded Mericans, God Bless the USA
http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014-drought-map-large-660x429.png
Nearly half of the contiguous U.S. is experiencing abnormally dry or drought conditions right now. The worst spots shown in the map above, colored in a deep red that represents “exceptional drought,” are in California, Nevada, Texas and Oklahoma. But the entire west and southwest are suffering.The map is based on a report from May 6 provided by the United States Drought Monitor that includes data on climate, soil and water collected from more than 350 sources.
The map is based on a report from May 6 provided by the United States Drought Monitor that includes data on climate, soil and water collected from more than 350 sources.
― Diddley Hollyberry (Phil D.), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
Also just to point out--even if the US doesn't go through a famine, there will be famines in other parts of the world--Africa, maybe Asia--and that can have huge ripple effects in the US
― famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:35 (eleven years ago)
Marco Rubio, your would-be GOP nominee for president: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/15/4119738/attacked-for-his-position-on-climate.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:36 (eleven years ago)
file:///C:/data/MAB_2014.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/14/us/politics/climate-change-deemed-growing-security-threat-by-military-researchers.html
― famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:39 (eleven years ago)
Ding ding ding, found the interview I was looking for, with a guy named David Fenton, who has a history of successfully working on these things, e.g. the anti-nuke efforts with Springsteen in 1979.
...That’s one thing the environmental movement still doesn’t do — use popular culture. There are moments, but systematically, the environmental movement tends to be at the institutional level — academics and lawyers and scientists and policy people. Popular culture as a means of communication is not in their DNA.Really, communications, period, is not in their DNA. If you look at the budgets of environmental groups, only teeny tiny portions are spent on communications. And if you remove the portions spent on building membership and fundraising, it’s even less. It’s better than it was. When I started, environmental groups barely had press secretaries. They certainly have that now.The other thing is that the foundations that support environmental groups don’t tend to value communications, either. And then I think there’s a deeper issue. George Lakoff, the linguist, talks about this. People who come from the humanities and science, they have a view that if you present the facts quietly to people in power, they will make rational judgements and people will change. And it’s not true. The people on the other side, who go to business school, they understand how the brain really works and how public opinion really works. So they’re talking about values and moral narratives and imagery. They’re good at it. So it’s an out of balance situation...
Really, communications, period, is not in their DNA. If you look at the budgets of environmental groups, only teeny tiny portions are spent on communications. And if you remove the portions spent on building membership and fundraising, it’s even less. It’s better than it was. When I started, environmental groups barely had press secretaries. They certainly have that now.
The other thing is that the foundations that support environmental groups don’t tend to value communications, either. And then I think there’s a deeper issue. George Lakoff, the linguist, talks about this. People who come from the humanities and science, they have a view that if you present the facts quietly to people in power, they will make rational judgements and people will change. And it’s not true. The people on the other side, who go to business school, they understand how the brain really works and how public opinion really works. So they’re talking about values and moral narratives and imagery. They’re good at it. So it’s an out of balance situation...
That's what we're getting at, I think. Marketing and outreach and promotion and communications are tainted with corporate ickiness, so the counterculture-spawned enviro groups instinctually reject them. That and assuming you know how people actually think and process information have obliterated green efforts for years(from what they actually could be).
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Friday, 16 May 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
yeah, after listening to (some) locals in the texas town that was blown up by the fertilizer plant go straight king of the hill ("the plant exploded, that's what they do. nothing to be done, really"), i feel like no amount of friendly, persuasive straight talk is gonna do jack shit. and if every tragedy is an act of god, the only answer is to pray harder.
― updates from chuck and betty (Hunt3r), Friday, 16 May 2014 17:05 (eleven years ago)
Like I said, you ain't gunna convert any diehards
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Friday, 16 May 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
Figure out how to make solar energy cheap and how to turn it into a job creator. As long as gas and oil and fracking is cheap and job creating (no matter how few jobs) Republicans will gravitate towards those things
― curmudgeon, Friday, 16 May 2014 17:50 (eleven years ago)
loooooooooool
Wednesday, May 14:'OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING' TO HIT WASHINGTON DC ON MAY 16TH IN AN ATTEMPT TO OUST OBAMA, BIDEN, BOEHNER, HOLDER
A group of self-described revolutionary-style patriots with a million mobilized militia members are heading to downtown Washington, D.C., this week to bring a simple message to political leadership, from President Obama to House Speaker John Boehner: Get out.They’re called the Operation American Spring — and they’re vowing to oust the likes of Mr. Obama, Mr. Boehner, Attorney General Eric Holder, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Sen. Mitch McConnell, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Raw Story reported....The group expects between 10 million and 30 million similarly thinking Americans to meet them in the capital on Friday for a rally that’s being billed as a sort of “Arab Spring” for Americans.
They’re called the Operation American Spring — and they’re vowing to oust the likes of Mr. Obama, Mr. Boehner, Attorney General Eric Holder, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Sen. Mitch McConnell, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Raw Story reported.
...The group expects between 10 million and 30 million similarly thinking Americans to meet them in the capital on Friday for a rally that’s being billed as a sort of “Arab Spring” for Americans.
Today:Operation American Spring falls flat: ‘This is very disappointing,’ Texan says
Operation American Spring, billed as a Friday morning multi-million patriot march on Washington, D.C., to oust leadership from the nation’s capital — from President Obama to House Speaker John Boeher — has proven woefully below expectations....Initial projections were for between 10 million and 30 million to come from around the nation and converge on the downtown capital city streets outside the White House and Capitol Building — a number the organizer of the event, Army Col. Harry Riley, called optimistic yet doable, given one million militia had already agreed to come....“This is very disappointing,” Mr. Milton said, speaking of the numbers who showed so far, while marching to the White House. “I’ve been taking to everybody for six months, telling them to come and telling them if it’s not realistic to get to D.C., … well then, go to your county courthouse [and protest].”The weather likely delayed some from showing, he said. But as the sun comes out, and the weekend weather dawns balmy, more could show, he said.“This isn’t just the one day thing,” Mr. Milton said. “Most of our group [126 from Texas] are going to stay most of the weekend. And when the bikers come in, there will much more. I know Connecticut’s here. I know Colorado’s here. I think Utah, maybe.”He also said the some of the planned Operation American Spring members who were planning to head to Washington, D.C., instead traveled to Nevada, to give support to cattle rancher Cliven Bundy in his fight against the federal government over grazing fees.“A lot that were supposed to come here went there instead,” Mr. Milton said.
Operation American Spring, billed as a Friday morning multi-million patriot march on Washington, D.C., to oust leadership from the nation’s capital — from President Obama to House Speaker John Boeher — has proven woefully below expectations.
...Initial projections were for between 10 million and 30 million to come from around the nation and converge on the downtown capital city streets outside the White House and Capitol Building — a number the organizer of the event, Army Col. Harry Riley, called optimistic yet doable, given one million militia had already agreed to come.
...“This is very disappointing,” Mr. Milton said, speaking of the numbers who showed so far, while marching to the White House. “I’ve been taking to everybody for six months, telling them to come and telling them if it’s not realistic to get to D.C., … well then, go to your county courthouse [and protest].”
The weather likely delayed some from showing, he said. But as the sun comes out, and the weekend weather dawns balmy, more could show, he said.
“This isn’t just the one day thing,” Mr. Milton said. “Most of our group [126 from Texas] are going to stay most of the weekend. And when the bikers come in, there will much more. I know Connecticut’s here. I know Colorado’s here. I think Utah, maybe.”
He also said the some of the planned Operation American Spring members who were planning to head to Washington, D.C., instead traveled to Nevada, to give support to cattle rancher Cliven Bundy in his fight against the federal government over grazing fees.
“A lot that were supposed to come here went there instead,” Mr. Milton said.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:26 (eleven years ago)
ah that brightened my day
― balls, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:29 (eleven years ago)
i know that it's the washington times, but the fact that Army Col. Harry Riley farted out a projection for 10 to 30 million people and that any news outlet repeated it is unbelievable. i hadn't even heard of the entire thing until i did a quick search for things happening in DC this weekend. "let's see, some nice happy hour specials there, i've been meaning to check out that exhibit, glad that's still running, looks like jazz in the sculpture garden is starting up soon, and ah yes, 10 to 30 million american patriots are descending on the capitol to jumpstart the american arab spring..."
― Karl Malone, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)
DS_8675309 • 44 minutes ago
"We are dedicated to taking our country back from tyrants, unless it rains."
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 16 May 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
on a serious tip if anyone has come across a good rundown of land use issues in nevada, thx. it does look pretty weird out there.
― goole, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:36 (eleven years ago)
is there a more pathetic phrase than "I know Connecticut’s here."
yeah how many people are out there anyway. is it a LOT? Or just like, 100
― famous instagram God (waterface), Friday, 16 May 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
well actually he forgot connecticut
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:42 (eleven years ago)
i'm going on a walk this afternoon, i might steer downtown to witness the revolution
― Karl Malone, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
the million militia march
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 16 May 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
http://gawker.com/operation-american-spring-the-rights-crazy-copy-of-occ-1577483689
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Friday, 16 May 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
Capt. Riley, platoon commander and 1st, 2nd and 3rd Lieutenant of the uprising:
I fought all through the Cold War and to me I've never seen a threat to the United States any greater than the internal threat that Obama and his administration and a Congress that does nothing reflect. We're in a serious, grave situation. It's a reason we're going to Washington to try, to try. I fear the next step, if this doesn't happen, is going to be something that not a combat soldier wants to see. We've been through the carnage, we've seen it, we understands what happens and that's the last thing we want.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:50 (eleven years ago)
the carnage... cats, dogs living together...
― Οὖτις, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
don't make me pull another my lai in the NoVa suburbs! don't make me!
― goole, Friday, 16 May 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
the cuban missile crisis had nothing on obama
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 16 May 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
so how many people did end up coming?
― marcos, Friday, 16 May 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/16/twitter-looks-for-operation-american-spring-where-is-everybody-im-confused/
― Diddley Hollyberry (Phil D.), Friday, 16 May 2014 19:08 (eleven years ago)
I love the sheltered conceptions of "tyranny" that these nuts grab onto. Trying to reason through the thought process is usually fruitless but the idea that Obama, by raising taxes or destroying the economy with a healthcare bill or even being the secret orchestrator of a cover up in Libya (all things he didn't do btw), is somehow practicing tyranny is really a bizarre notion. Nobody is claiming that he's imprisoning people for political reasons or carrying out martial law or whatever, so I don't know how you spin even the most hilarious misunderstandings of his policy into the kind of thing that demands rebellion
― building a desert (art), Friday, 16 May 2014 19:27 (eleven years ago)
racism requires no logic
― marcos, Friday, 16 May 2014 19:37 (eleven years ago)
the tyranny is a black man is telling white people what to do
― Οὖτις, Friday, 16 May 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
In fact, it's allergic to it.
― Griðian and friðian and takin' the piðian (Michael White), Friday, 16 May 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
Knowing a lot of people in Idaho means this has been making the rounds on facebook:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfJJ4-AUyYg
They're all appalled of course because it certainly doesn't do anything to negate the perception of Idaho as a state full of crazy people but they're more upset because these two dudes make the other two "real" candidates (who are slightly less insane republicans) look reasonable in comparison.
― joygoat, Saturday, 17 May 2014 00:46 (eleven years ago)
nice to see Queen Hil kissing Baba Wawa's ass
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 17 May 2014 05:10 (eleven years ago)
I get really worked up about the whole "tyranny" thing because it's like YOU WOULD FUCKING LAST IN A TYRANNY RUNNIN YOUR GODDAMN MOUTH OFF ALL THE TIME
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 17 May 2014 13:33 (eleven years ago)
an auto instructor at the college where I work approvingly brought up the american spring to his class last week. he was super blase about it, like come monday morning class would reconvene and the entire structure of american government would be altered, no big deal.
― funny unconscious rocks creating your consciousness with free choice (reddening), Saturday, 17 May 2014 16:20 (eleven years ago)
Even the fucking Washington Times reported the turnout for American Spring as "a few dozens of protestors". Ouch.
― king of chin-stroking banality (Aimless), Saturday, 17 May 2014 16:29 (eleven years ago)
what is this "operation american spring"? i guessing that i'm not missing anything important here.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:17 (eleven years ago)
it was some sort of Teabagger temper tantrum march on Washington DC whose backers touted to attract over 1 million protesters.
― in the realm of the menses (Eisbaer), Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:18 (eleven years ago)
from what i'm seeing on twitter, looks like attendance ... fell short of expectations?
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:21 (eleven years ago)
The organizers were absolutely certain a million would show, and dreamed of "10 to 30 million", as quoted about 20 or so posts above.
― king of chin-stroking banality (Aimless), Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:37 (eleven years ago)
i wandered around DC for a few hours yesterday searching for #OAS and never did find the main group, if there was a main group. i saw a few patriots wandering around the capitol side of the mall, and several members of the Connecticut Militia (the only members?) up at the Treasury building, and then no one at the White House. Instagram evidence (#OperationAmericanSpring) is confusing - there were some images showing a few dozen people walking along the mall toward the Washington Monument (must have missed that, although I did smell a hint of lingering patriotism), and also some images showing a packed crowd in front of the capitol which i think were just reused from actual protests from last year. and now the last hundred images or so with the hashtag are all some russian or ukranian guy who is completely insane
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:38 (eleven years ago)
The organizers ... dreamed of "10 to 30 million."― king of chin-stroking banality (Aimless), Saturday, May 17, 2014
― king of chin-stroking banality (Aimless), Saturday, May 17, 2014
i dreamed of flying to the moon on a magic unicorn.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:39 (eleven years ago)
really the blame should be put on raw story and whoever else decided to pick up on "the story" in the weeks leading up to it. whoever organized the event and provided that estimate is clearly insane.
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 17 May 2014 23:43 (eleven years ago)
this morning at the White House there was a smallish crowd of antinuke arms protestors incl Jehovah's Witnesses, that's it.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 May 2014 04:12 (eleven years ago)
http://rt.com/usa/158460-cia-director-metadata-kill-people/
― Mordy, Monday, 19 May 2014 15:50 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_05/just_send_a_staffer_for_that_v050446.php
Republican nominee for Governor of Arkansas knows how to deal with new voter ID laws there
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:19 (eleven years ago)
I take it Sam Nunn's daughter is just as appalling as Dad was?
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
p much
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
Probably, and her eventual Georgia Senatorial Republican opponent is likely to be even worse. Republicans have to have a runoff as no one topped 50 % in their primary yesterday. At least the Sarah Palin supported candidate was not one of the top 2.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:50 (eleven years ago)
Although that might have helped Nunn
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:51 (eleven years ago)
I'm really mad I still have to see Jack Kingston commercials.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
this morning at the White House there was a smallish crowd of antinuke arms protestors incl Jehovah's Witnesses, that's it.― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Sunday, May 18, 2014 12:12 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Sunday, May 18, 2014 12:12 AM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think some of those anti-nuke protestors are there all the time, like year round or something
― marcos, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)
yep, there's are anti-nukes people in a tent there every day, round the clock. since 1981.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Peace_Vigil
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 19:05 (eleven years ago)
lol @ Chuck Todd types thinking a diiference exists between "establishment " and Tea Party conservatives.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 19:13 (eleven years ago)
And Nunn is fucking awful. She's probably another Ben Nelson.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:05 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
few friends of mine take part in this--the stamina for doing this (and dealing with the endless influx of tourists, mockery, and angry people) rain or shine or snow blows my mind
― purposely lend impetus to my HOOS (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
kingston's from savannah, longtime congressman who is kinda standard conservative republican who's tacked right (or far right rather) of late (he probably works as a good symbol of how the party has subsumed and absorbed the tea party, the story of 2014 possibly) though i don't think he gave away any assault rifles. broun and gingrey were the tea party candidates, broun much more of a force than gingrey, he briefly led the race but ultimately couldn't appeal to north atlanta suburbs or south ga. both of them were loud lunatics, in 2010 or 2012 broun wins this race or makes the runoff. until this race broun was my congressman, was hoping we might get a sane dull conservative at least but the leader heading into the runoff in ga 10 is a tea party minister w/ a talk radio show so i think we may actually be trading down god help us. kingston was known as athens 'real' congressman, broun was generally opposed to the existence of the federal govt in general nevermind the federal govt spending money on things like roads or education and kingston would be the congressman who kinda kept an eye out for us there. running against him is david perdue, 'businessman, washington outsider', generally parroting standard gop cw though not quite getting the terminology right and getting in trouble as a result. he's been running ads depicting the rest of the field as babies for a couple of months. cousin of and shares a last name w/ a fairly popular former governor, he performed well all over the state, i suspect he'll win. i suspect also he's an easier candidate for nunn to beat, esp considering his record as a 'businessman' includes court settlements in the millions for discriminating against women. nunn's polling shockingly well, i was skeptical ga was a potential pickup for dems and i still would bet against it but i could be wrong. at the very least i'm hoping this is the end for karen handel.
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
Nunn's answer ton ACA question a few days ago was repulsive.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)
*to a
did i correctly hear this Dem running vs Mitch say in an NPR clip this morning "I'm against Obama's war on coal?"
quite a party u guys got there
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
pro-coal dem in kentucky will wonders never cease
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
tbf it's tough to imagine ny electing a wall street friendly dem
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:52 (eleven years ago)
yeah i know she has to be a whore for coal -- and if that's what it takes, FUCK them all -- but to hear her use GOP lingo well what's that about preferring a Real Anything to a copycat.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:57 (eleven years ago)
also that's why im running vs Schumer next time xp
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 20:58 (eleven years ago)
wasn't nunn's answer (to the extent she managed to get something coherent out) 'mend it, don't end it' ie basically the party line for dems (including incumbents)(including not in the csa) - 'it doesn't need to be repealed, it needs to be reformed (plz don't ask me how)'? considering even obama can't really muster up a stronger defense (here's an idea - run ads w/ the millions of ppl who have health insurance now), i can't blame a centrist southern dem who's never been in a campaign before for failing to come up w/ a defense of the liberalism that would win over a state that wallace and mccain won.
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:01 (eleven years ago)
schumer up for reelection that soon?
nah it was worse:
NBC: Would you have voted for the Affordable Care Act?
NUNN: So at the time that the Affordable Health Care Act was passed, I was working for Points Of Light. I wish that we had had more people who had tried to architect a bipartisan legislation.
NBC: So, yes or no?
NUNN: So, you know, I think it's impossible to look back retrospectively and say 'what would you have done when you were there?'
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:03 (eleven years ago)
Of course she knows this president exhausted himself trying to get the likes of Tom Coburn to support him, and that "bipartisanship" is the same losing card Dems have played for decades.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
also "look back retrospectively"
lol you're just pissed she used 'architect' as a verb
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:05 (eleven years ago)
beyond obfuscating so you can keep the advantage of not having a record to be used against you what's the smart answer there? assuming you're running for senate cuz you actually want to be elected to the senate and you're running in a state like georgia?
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
the Art of Apeealing to Morons
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:13 (eleven years ago)
what's the smart craven answer there?
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:15 (eleven years ago)
like you know a difference
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:18 (eleven years ago)
morbs & al have convinced me; i'm voting for jack kingston
― macklin' rosie (crüt), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
There doesn't seem to be any way to become senator of Georgia without compromising so much as to not be able to do anything. So if you're in politics for the right reasons, why run for senator in Georgia? So many other ways to help people/change things, but on a smaller scale. And less well-payed, obviously.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
You know Georgia better than I do. Were she to say "It's got problems, which it wouldn't have had if I'd been in the Senate in 2010," would it look better than "man, I wish I'd played Ben Nelson in the Senate"? My fear is she turns out to be like one of Rahm's little elves, urged to run in 2006 in red states
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:20 (eleven years ago)
when you're a leftist in Georgia in 2014 you don't have high expectations stepping into the voting booth
― macklin' rosie (crüt), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:22 (eleven years ago)
fwiw Nunn had a lot more to say than that severely truncated bit quoted above
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/05/19/read_what_georgia_s_michelle_nunn_actually_said_about_obamacare.html
― anonanon, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
Nunn waffles on the full ACA, but is vocal about a medicaid expansion in the state. That gives her a leg up on Kingston or Perdue either one because polling shows that Georgians want a medicaid expansion too.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:37 (eleven years ago)
So if you're in politics for the right reasons, why run for senator in Georgia? So many other ways to help people/change things, but on a smaller scale. - or if you're her dad on a larger scale
i could imagine her (and maybe kingston in the next few weeks) really trying to go after perdue on common core, his cousin was a force behind it when the gop was gung ho about fulfilling reagan's vision of nationally standardized education. i could be wrong and who knows we may even get to find out fingers crossed but she's way more hagan or landrieu than ben nelson or lieberman. i'm thinking the genuine smart craven answer w/ the advantage of hindsight 20/20 is to say you wouldn't have voted for it (cuz it doesn't matter at this point), double down on mend it don't end it (maybe even mention 'millions of american have health insurance now cuz of it' as a reason to not repeal, just a thought), if cornered on why maybe concede some rightwing fronts (small business, individual mandate) and then propose as a solution something anodyne leftist that polls well in ga that makes it so you'll never actually be called on those concessions should you be elected (there are leftist criticisms of aca and the mandate). above all stay vague. maybe toss in 'i don't think shutting down the govt for no reason is the answer', see if anybody remembers seven months ago.
― balls, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:39 (eleven years ago)
ppl can do whatever they want in the voting booth w/ my blessing, crüt, as long as they hate themselves in the morning.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
i certainly have
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 21:41 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jody-hice-gay-community-secret-plot-sodomize-children
This guy is a treat!
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 22:16 (eleven years ago)
man why can't bros just be alone in a bathroom together anymore, gays gotta ruin everything
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 21 May 2014 22:18 (eleven years ago)
oh yeah Florida has one too: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2014/05/fl-rep-van-zant-common-core-tied-testing-firm-will-make-kids-as-homosexual-as-possible.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 May 2014 22:28 (eleven years ago)
Excellent piece on centrism.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 May 2014 14:52 (eleven years ago)
^^^
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 22 May 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
they're passing a fucking brutal pro-fracking bill in NC today
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 22 May 2014 17:15 (eleven years ago)
get earthquake insurance
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 22 May 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)
our Cuomo loves fracking too
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 22 May 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-will-it-take-to-fix-va-health-care/?wpisrc=nl_wonk
There also doesn't appear to be a major quality problem among the agency's doctors and nurses either, even though it appears that not enough veterans can get through the door to see them. Veterans' advocates who appeared before Congress last week agreed that once veterans get access to care within the VA system, it is high-quality care. The problem is getting access to that care in the first place.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 15:12 (eleven years ago)
A good tactic with taxi drivers: go silent for a bit, then suddenly change the subject to something related to the current traffic.
― baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 23 May 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
Ha
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 15:36 (eleven years ago)
We can still talk fracking. But as long as fracking appears cheaper in the short-term, politicians will still go for it as will many others. While we grumble about it here
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
LOL BRB, putting that on other thread.
― baked beings on toast (suzy), Friday, 23 May 2014 15:41 (eleven years ago)
ha, i thought maybe it was some sort of indirect comment about dealing with republican intransigence
― go to evangelical agonizing eternal hell (Karl Malone), Friday, 23 May 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
Oh yeah.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
Not sure why Dems were surprised by this:
House Republicans proposed a $20.9 billion budget for agriculture and food safety programs Monday, an 82-page bill that challenges the White House on nutrition rules and denies major new funding sought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to better regulate the rich derivatives market.
the bill language specifies that only rural areas are to benefit in the future from funding requested by the administration this year to continue a modest summer demonstration program to help children from low-income households — both urban and rural — during those months when school meals are not available.
Since 2010, the program has operated from an initial appropriation of $85 million, and the goal has been to test alternative approaches to distribute aid when schools are not in session. The White House asked for an additional $30 million to continue the effort, but the House bill provides $27 million for what’s described as an entirely new pilot program focused on rural areas only.
Democrats were surprised to see urban children were excluded. And the GOP had some trouble explaining the history itself. But a spokeswoman confirmed that the intent of the bill is a pilot project in “rural areas” only.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/house-gop-agriculture-budget-white-house-106831.html#ixzz32Yee2rT7
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
the GOP had some trouble explaining the history itself.
it must be hard to not be able to just say out loud how much you hate brown people
― Οὖτις, Friday, 23 May 2014 16:56 (eleven years ago)
To me, "rural only" comes off as an attempt at garden-variety pork-barrel to reward their base. The GOP seems to have a lock on most of the agricultural and resource extraction counties in the USA. btw, not all brown people live in cities, especially in the southern tier states.
― king of chin-stroking banality (Aimless), Friday, 23 May 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
WASHINGTON (AP) — A former Justice Department official who helped devise the Obama administration's legal justification for using drones to kill American terror suspects overseas won Senate approval Thursday to become a top federal judge.
David Barron was confirmed by a mostly party-line vote of 53-45. He will join the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is based in Boston.
Barron was acting head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in 2009 and 2010 when he authored memos explaining why the government had the constitutional authority to kill Americans in counterterrorism operations abroad, even if they were not on a battlefield.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/senate-oks-barron-to-be-judge
― curmudgeon, Friday, 23 May 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
House Votes To Deny Climate Science And Ties Pentagon’s Hands On Climate Change
With a mostly party-line vote on Thursday, the House of Representatives passed an amendment sponsored by Rep. David McKinley (R-WV) that seeks to prevent the Department of Defense from using funding to address the national security impacts of climate change....The full text of McKinley’s amendment reads:"None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to implement the U.S. Global Change Research Program National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report, the United Nation’s Agenda 21 sustainable development plan, or the May 2013 Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order"
...The full text of McKinley’s amendment reads:
"None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to implement the U.S. Global Change Research Program National Climate Assessment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report, the United Nation’s Agenda 21 sustainable development plan, or the May 2013 Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order"
― go to evangelical agonizing eternal hell (Karl Malone), Saturday, 24 May 2014 00:38 (eleven years ago)
No good political news from D.C.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 24 May 2014 00:45 (eleven years ago)
Florida's Republican governor Scott plans to spend 100 mil to get re-elected
http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/24/4136068/floridas-governors-race-mean-and.html?utm_campaign=2014-05-27-Stateline%20Daily.html&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 May 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
a tenth the price of a presidency; seems fair for a big state
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 May 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
and Florida won't be worth more than a sand bar in 2060.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 May 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
get it while it's dry.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 May 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
obv Orlando will be levee'd, those ppl aint lettin shit happen to their cashcow.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 27 May 2014 17:31 (eleven years ago)
Meanwhile in Texas, We've got a bigger problem now...
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2014/05/dan-patrick-seems-poised-to-yank-texas-lieutenant-governorship-from-david-dewhurst.html/
― Damnit Janet Weiss & The Riot Grrriel (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 28 May 2014 06:54 (eleven years ago)
it yielded a lol at least -
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bosc_ZHCUAAF9jb.jpg
― balls, Wednesday, 28 May 2014 07:22 (eleven years ago)
Norquist, Nader and a Cali Republican businessman/politician discuss:
But what if Democrats were to make a free-market argument that a higher minimum wage would shrink the federal government and reduce the welfare state?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-ralph-nader-and-grover-norquist-tread-common-political-ground/2014/05/27/856bf7c8-e5e7-11e3-8f90-73e071f3d637_story.html?hpid=z2
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 28 May 2014 13:52 (eleven years ago)
But big business/Republicans don't actually want to shrink the welfare state they just want to shrink the amount going to poor people.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 28 May 2014 14:29 (eleven years ago)
“The government spends over $250 billion a year in social welfare programs aimed at the working poor,” he said, addressing the group via Skype. “If we simply made the working poor much less poor by raising their wages to a much more reasonable level, a lot of that money would be saved, probably in the range of $40 to $50 billion a year.” The $250 billion spent on welfare for the working poor, Unz said, amounts to a “massive subsidy for businesses” that are paying less than a living wage and “forcing taxpayers to make up the difference.”
I guess most Republicans would argue with the math here and insist that paying more in minimum wage would not lead to reduced amounts spent elsewhere
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 28 May 2014 15:35 (eleven years ago)
Plues they don't want to force businesses to spend more on minimum wages (they want them to spend less)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 28 May 2014 15:36 (eleven years ago)
well the typical argument is that businesses will simply have to reduce headcount to account for the additional labor expense, and then those fired people are unemployed, and even more dependent and burdensome.
― playback in metal position (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 28 May 2014 16:05 (eleven years ago)
While the NY Times responds to Obama's just announced timeline on leaving Afghanistan by suggesting US could do so earlier, the Washington Post editorial board instead thinks we need more US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq until the facts more clearly demonstrate that its ok for US troops to leave, and that we should blame Obama for not having the US more involved in Syria and Libya
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-obama-continues-his-retreat-from-afghanistan/2014/05/27/ae01686e-e5c2-11e3-8f90-73e071f3d637_story.html
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 28 May 2014 16:36 (eleven years ago)
darth muslim is showing The Enemy we're weak again, just like in benghazi!
meanwhile, gop voters have to be the biggest chumps or hypocrites in the world, hard to tell
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/28/how_the_gop_civil_war_ended_jack_kingston_proves_both_sides_are_winning/
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 28 May 2014 16:52 (eleven years ago)
Shinseki out at VA, and Carney quits as Press secretary...Friday afternoon news............
― curmudgeon, Friday, 30 May 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
Carney off to follow GBV across america
― it definitely wasn't designed to be a pants pocket player (stevie), Saturday, 31 May 2014 09:54 (eleven years ago)
He got to introduce them onstage recently at Black Cat. That was probably the moment where he decided to quit as press secretary.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 31 May 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
Or he already had his mind made up to leave and cleared it with his higher-ups before doing the stage work
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Saturday, 31 May 2014 16:57 (eleven years ago)
You're being too logical about this. Plus, he had been onstage introducing them before.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 31 May 2014 17:17 (eleven years ago)
http://www.salon.com/2014/05/31/chris_christie_quietly_implodes_why_his_big_accomplishments_have_fallen_to_pieces/
more scandals, more NJ economic problems,
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 31 May 2014 17:19 (eleven years ago)
bowe bergdahl story moving from scuttlebutt to national news it looks like this week
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 11:40 (eleven years ago)
The Politics of Climate Change This Summer Will Be Worse Than Obamacare’s
...The sudden renewal of the conservative Benghazi obsession arises, in part, from party leaders’ needing a new outrage to cover a quiet retreat from the Obamacare jihad. But the issue sits too far from everyday voter concerns to carry the party through to November. Obama’s new regulations can fill that vacuum once occupied by health care. As right-wing hate fodder, it may even exceed it. No specifics have yet leaked, but the general shape of the plan is widely known: Obama will announce new national guidelines limiting emissions for existing power plants, which account for 40 percent of all carbon-dioxide emissions. The plan both fulfills a generational goal of liberal social policy and stokes conservative fears of an unaccountable executive. It’s Obamacare and Benghazi rolled into one....The grimmest contrast between power-plant regulation and health care is that regulating carbon emissions creates almost no winners. There will be no equivalent of the millions of people newly granted access to medical care, no heartwarming stories of long-suffering patients seeing a doctor for the first time in years. Climate regulation doesn’t create a benefit. It doesn’t even prevent a loss. Its only goal is to mitigate the extent of the damage.
...The grimmest contrast between power-plant regulation and health care is that regulating carbon emissions creates almost no winners. There will be no equivalent of the millions of people newly granted access to medical care, no heartwarming stories of long-suffering patients seeing a doctor for the first time in years. Climate regulation doesn’t create a benefit. It doesn’t even prevent a loss. Its only goal is to mitigate the extent of the damage.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 2 June 2014 12:44 (eleven years ago)
i don't actually think it's going to be worse than obamacare (congress doesn't have a heavy role and i don't expect the legal/trial stuff to capture the attention of america) but it's definitely going to result in a lot of internet arguments. maybe we'll all learn something this summer!
― Karl Malone, Monday, 2 June 2014 12:51 (eleven years ago)
Every time I read Chait I need to take a shower.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 June 2014 13:32 (eleven years ago)
I must be lucky in that the last thing I read of his was just this generic thing on Megyn Kelly of Fox News and her Fox viewers:
This was widely predicted when Kelly started last year, by reporters ("building a younger audience is a constant concern, if not the driving force in these latest changes"), academics (she "could improve performance among some younger viewers as well as among women"), and hopeful conservatives ("one of her jobs is to attract younger viewers to the network").
And it turns out Kelly is bringing down the age of her audience — all the way down to a sprightly median age of 71.7 years old. Her audience agrees with her that Jesus was white because they knew him when he was still alive.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 2 June 2014 13:56 (eleven years ago)
I saw that Obama's signing statement (mentioning his Commander-in-chief powers) to a law regarding notification to Congress regarding intent to release Guantanomo prisoners, was mentioned last week regarding the deal to release that American prisoner (after negotiating with the Taliban!).
― curmudgeon, Monday, 2 June 2014 13:59 (eleven years ago)
x-post-- oh that Chait piece re Greenwald et. al. is horrible
― curmudgeon, Monday, 2 June 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
Climate regulation doesn’t create a benefit.
oh FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING IDIOT
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
yeah, i almost called that out on that bit, but i'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he means that the average american isn't going to notice the benefits. not in the near term, and likely not even in the future (because people generally don't think of an action that makes a bad thing slightly less bad as a benefit). the regulations will incentivize clean energy production, but i don't think most people really understand where their electricity currently comes from in the first place. they just want to recharge their iphones, and this won't make it charge any faster or slower.
in contrast, with obamacare there are millions of people able to get health insurance that weren't able to previously. and other environmental regulations produced more tangible effects like reducing smog or preventing piles of human waste from floating down rivers.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:08 (eleven years ago)
yeah by benefit there i would assume he means 'something you can see and attach a number specific to you to that is having a tangible, material effect on yr life' ie money or service in yr pocket.
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
like bending the health care cost curve is a potential benefit of obamacare and reducing poverty is a benefit of social security but that's not how ppl think of those programs as 'benefits'.
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
maybe he should have used the term 'bennies'.
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
most people really understand where their electricity currently comes from in the first place
most people in this country don't even understand how electricity works
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:18 (eleven years ago)
thousands of guys in Ben Franklin costumes holding kites with keys attached
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 June 2014 16:22 (eleven years ago)
http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/images/static.jpg
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Monday, 2 June 2014 16:26 (eleven years ago)
Whenever I go outside the city and then come back I can literally see & smell smog in the air so maybe this guy should open his eyes. I know it's not as tangible as the bottom line numbers on a stock exchange for commodities futures but the air I and every other living thing breathes every day is a tangible, material thing to me.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 2 June 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)
This is where the climate science thing of focusing on disaster predictions in the future turns into useful strawman for the right. Easy to ignore climate change not so easy to ignore "Old people and children should minimize time spent outside today" on local weather forecasts.
― ▴▲ ▴TH3CR()$BY$H()W▴▲ ▴ (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 2 June 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
In his weekly address on Saturday, Obama provided a preview of how the White House hopes to frame the coming war over the new EPA rules. They will be framed as a public health imperative and an opportunity to speed the transition to a clean-energy economy that minimizes waste and spurs innovation that creates new jobs.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/06/02/morning-plum-never-mind-2014-climate-change-will-be-big-issue-in-2016/?hpid=z3
Not a simple and easy thing to frame
― curmudgeon, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
we're gonna take this money over here from the petroleum industry - which has destroyed the world - and move it over here to this other industry, which is going to try to minimize the damage.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
thing i would like to hear a POTUS say:
"yes, senator, i am killing coal, you selfish fuck"
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 2 June 2014 17:51 (eleven years ago)
good luck finding 60% of americans that agree w/ both parts of that argument shakey. hell good luck finding 60% who agree w/ either part.
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:52 (eleven years ago)
Οὖτις is Shakey?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 June 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
that's why I'm not the president
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
um yes it's mexp
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:58 (eleven years ago)
why do people change their names so often, what do you get out of this
― iatee, Monday, 2 June 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00796/P-Diddy_796482c.jpg
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
I can't speak for other people but this is the only time I've changed my login in 15 years and I did it cuz I was sick of being stuck w the old one, which I had initially created as a jokey sf ref
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
nobody is even going to call you outic tho
― iatee, Monday, 2 June 2014 18:05 (eleven years ago)
just don't call me late for dinner
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
there are worse dn's to be stuck with
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 2 June 2014 18:07 (eleven years ago)
Sully gettin' excited about Barry again.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 June 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
what on earth
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/scott-fistler-cesar-chavez-arizona-congress
― goole, Monday, 2 June 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
Xp
that was one of the things i thought of immediately - 5 detainees closer to closure. given the congress obama has been saddled with, and the reasonable assertion of a public mandate for closure, perhaps executive action isn't such a bad idea
― building a desert (art), Monday, 2 June 2014 19:14 (eleven years ago)
yo balls
The overwhelming majority of Americans support the idea of the federal government curbing greenhouse gas emissions, even if they have to pay for it. A new Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 70 percent of Americans back federal carbon limits on existing power plants, and 63 percent — including 51 percent of Republicans, 64 percent of independents and 71 percent of Democrats — said they would be willing to pay $20 a month in order to do so.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:38 (eleven years ago)
heck, I'll pay $40
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 2 June 2014 20:40 (eleven years ago)
xp those numbers seem a little unbelievable to me
― Nhex, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)
noted radical liberal rag the Washington Post
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
I bet those numbers get even more pro-curbing emissions among younger voters
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:45 (eleven years ago)
63% of the people you know would pay $20 a month to fight greenhouse gases?
― Nhex, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
lol do you know where I live?
I didn't take the poll btw
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
he lives in the north pole, so...
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 2 June 2014 20:49 (eleven years ago)
― Nhex, Monday, June 2, 2014 8:47 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the polls looked bad but peggy noonan saw a lot of romney yard signs
― Matt Armstrong, Monday, 2 June 2014 20:58 (eleven years ago)
Meanwhile matters look grim for James Risen.
The Supreme Court on Monday turned down an appeal from James Risen, a New York Times reporter facing jail for refusing to identify a confidential source.
The court’s one-line order gave no reasons but effectively sided with the government in a confrontation between what prosecutors said is an imperative to secure evidence in a national security prosecution and what journalists said is an intolerable infringement of press freedom.
The case arose from a subpoena to Mr. Risen seeking information about his source for a chapter of his 2006 book “State of War.” Prosecutors say they need Mr. Risen’s testimony to prove that the source was Jeffrey Sterling, a former Central Intelligence Agency official.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 June 2014 20:59 (eleven years ago)
o well nothing to worry about then, i'm sure ppl will vote accordingly this november
― balls, Monday, 2 June 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
i'd glady pay $20 a month in order to save the environment (or at least to help ease my terror re the future). is that on offer?
― Mordy, Monday, 2 June 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
i'm sure ppl will vote accordingly this november
haha yeah needless to say polls and voting patterns are totally different things
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 June 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
the subscription model and saving the planet, two things i can really get behind
― mattresslessness, Monday, 2 June 2014 23:07 (eleven years ago)
earthify
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 2 June 2014 23:10 (eleven years ago)
heard it really screws over organisms :/
― mattresslessness, Monday, 2 June 2014 23:14 (eleven years ago)
turn the screws, barry
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-says-he-consulted-congress-prisoner-swap
fuck the republicans
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 14:11 (eleven years ago)
The signing statement bothers me tbh
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 15:00 (eleven years ago)
should've traded every prisoner we have; lame duck, bitchez.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 15:02 (eleven years ago)
For snacks
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 15:09 (eleven years ago)
Bc we're watching movies in the Oval Office 2nite
― Sufjenga Cat Giffin (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 15:10 (eleven years ago)
Welp, I voted. I had thought about voting in the Repub primary for Chris McDaniel, on the theory of getting the most bugfuck crazy asshole in the race into the general election. But then the likely Democratic candidate, Travis Childers, is no dreamboat either -- he's agin' the ACA, he's agin' marriage equality, he's just as conservative as the Republican candidates, so fuck him. So I voted in the Dem primary and wrote in the name of my state senator in both races. He's a decent guy and one of the few non-Delta Dems left in the state legislature.
― WilliamC, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:16 (eleven years ago)
y'know I was thinking the other day how it's crazy how gay marriage is legal now and yet my life has not changed a single iota. fascinating how civilization didn't end.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:23 (eleven years ago)
attended my first gay wedding in California on Sunday. It was pretty awesome.
― nitro-burning funny car (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
some very excited gay dudes were getting their marriage license right after we got ours at the beverly hills courthouse. we mini celebrated w them on the way out.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
Charles Pierce holds nothing back regarding l'affaire Bergdahl.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:20 (eleven years ago)
who knows if we'll ever know the truth w/ bergdahl and god knows if the army is that interested in learning it. generally agree w/ the common sentiment that whatever he is guilty of, five years as a pow of the taliban is probably punishment enough. as for the risk of life and loss of life that resulted from his desertion these are regrettable and legitimate concerns but ultimately that's the job. you could maybe argue that there's something positive about gop resistance to army brass (very understandably) wanting to sweep this under the carpet but i don't think the gop actually has any interest in finding out the truth. anyone saying that obama shouldn't have dealt for him or made precedent by doing so is clueless and ignorant of history.
― balls, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:34 (eleven years ago)
love how disgusting "conservative" assholes are arguing against bringing home POWs. fuck you
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:45 (eleven years ago)
not an unusual political combo. Israeli right wingers often vocal critics of prisoner for pow trades
― Mordy, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:50 (eleven years ago)
just four months ago the silly hypocrites were demanding we bring bergdahl home "by any means necessary"
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/43450_Flashback!_1-2014-_PJ_Media_Encourages_Readers_to_Sign_Petition_to_Free_Bergdahl_By_Any_Means_Necessary/comments/
so when president benghazi does what they want him to, they attack! again, fuck you, republicans!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117984/coal-country-backlash-over-obama-rules-wont-swing-midterm-elections
Nationally, there are 78,000 people employed in coal mining—well less than half as many as are employed in oil and gas extraction, and not much more than the number of people employed in logging.) To put that in perspective: the auto manufacturing industry in Kentucky employs three times as many people as the coal industry does today. When is the last time you heard pundits making grand predictions about how new auto-industry regulations would affect Kentucky “Car Country”?
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
"coal country" voters' allegiance to an industry that has routinely murdered, robbed, polluted, and otherwise oppressed their communities is a wondrous thing
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 June 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
The Ministry of Truth doublethink stuff from the right-wing media surrounding Bergdahl is crazy to me! How can they change their truths so immediately and effortlessly?
― Dan I., Wednesday, 4 June 2014 02:35 (eleven years ago)
they've always been that way (the ends (low taxes!) justify the means) -- just now with constant social media surveillance documenting them they're getting called on their bullshit, and they still haven't adjusted
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 02:54 (eleven years ago)
Cochran was leading early on, but Chris McDaniel is up by about 4000 in the MS Senate primary. They're right on the edge of having to do it all over again in a runoff — 49.9% to 48.5%.
― WilliamC, Wednesday, 4 June 2014 03:06 (eleven years ago)
LOL
http://mashable.com/2014/06/03/republicans-delete-bowe-bergdahl-praise/
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 11:49 (eleven years ago)
the taliban is a more willing and honorable negotiating partner with the POTUS than congressional republicans are -- fox news admits it!
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/06/03/bergdahl-prisoner-swap-team-obama-more-willing-to-negotiate-with-terrorists/?cmpid=sem_fkfn
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
not to mention the fact that, due to technological advancement, the amount of coal output per miner has increased so significantly that it has outpaced regulation in recent years with the result being that a bunch of miners in their mid 20's are coming up with black lung now (which was relatively unheard of in previous generations). so not only does coal murder, rob, pollute and oppress but it's doing so with greater and greater efficacy every year.
― building a desert (art), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
I bet chinese coal miners get black lung in their teens. the obama administration is hamstringing out efforts to compete with china.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 4 June 2014 17:58 (eleven years ago)
Didn't watch the Sunday morning shows for at least a year--looked in a bit the past couple of weeks. Funny watching Bill Richardson be so magnanimous towards Hillary this morning: "Please, let me back into the fold."
― clemenza, Sunday, 8 June 2014 14:45 (eleven years ago)
and Bill Kristol is still allowed to leave green rooms without a federal marshal cuffing him
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 8 June 2014 14:50 (eleven years ago)
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 8 June 2014 15:32 (eleven years ago)
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/208514-cia-report-declassification-expected-by-july-4-feinstein-says
CIA will probably mark out most of the report, and rewrite the rest.
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 8 June 2014 15:33 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/report-philip-puckett-resigning-virginia-gop-medicaid
Republicans in Virginia have reportedly persuaded state Sen. Phillip P. Puckett (D) to resign and accept a prestigious job offer, giving the GOP a slim majority in the state Senate that would allow it to block Medicaid expansion.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 9 June 2014 14:21 (eleven years ago)
"deputy director of the state tobacco commission"
most classic whorefuck ever
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 9 June 2014 14:24 (eleven years ago)
Yes, he's taking that one and his daughter would be on track for appointment to a judgeship
Republicans killer instinct
― curmudgeon, Monday, 9 June 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
I admire the brazenness!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 9 June 2014 15:31 (eleven years ago)
on one hand I am disgusted, on the other I am impressed
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 June 2014 16:02 (eleven years ago)
whats surprising isnt so much how corrupt the government is, but HOW FUCKING CHEAP people sell themselves for.
tobacco commission? what do they even do?
― Οὖτις, Monday, 9 June 2014 16:10 (eleven years ago)
advocate for squeezing more profit from death
― Aimless, Monday, 9 June 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
sounds healthy
― Οὖτις, Monday, 9 June 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
I applaud this dick for doing his part to amend Gore Vidal's assessment "the Democrats were a little more corrupt... until recently."
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Monday, 9 June 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
I will gladly sell out hundreds of thousands of my constituents today for a hamburger on tuesday
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 9 June 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
http://www.richmondsunlight.com/legislator/pppuckett/
― goole, Monday, 9 June 2014 16:19 (eleven years ago)
Proud legislative sponsor of SB72: Tourist Train Development Authority; reinstates Authority and its board.
― Aimless, Monday, 9 June 2014 16:28 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/476065909308923904
@sahilkapur
Fwiw, one Virginia source who knows Puckett tells me he's a decent guy but not that bright & probably didn't realize how this would look.
― goole, Monday, 9 June 2014 18:29 (eleven years ago)
how could he have known that it would look slightly worse than handing out cigarettes to small children
― Οὖτις, Monday, 9 June 2014 18:30 (eleven years ago)
I've done that :(
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 9 June 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)
i laffed
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BptuC_ZCIAARSgz.png
― goole, Monday, 9 June 2014 20:21 (eleven years ago)
Who else is reading Hellary's "book"? It's a real page-turner!
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 14:20 (eleven years ago)
No one reads these things. They end up remaindered. So much for going green.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 14:21 (eleven years ago)
let's take this guy down!
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/punish-bowe-bergdahl-being-awol-desertion-during-operation-enduring-freedom/BVPwpnrN
fuck due process!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 14:34 (eleven years ago)
Five American Special Operations service members and at least one Afghan soldier were killed when a coalition aircraft accidentally struck their position, Afghan and American officials said Tuesday.
See? We don't bomb weddings maliciously. We're just not great at aiming.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
no, wedding parties with Objectionable Guests have most def been targeted
(and a few junior terrorists obv being used as shields, they're crafty that way)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
eric cantor just lost his primary
― goole, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:52 (eleven years ago)
Adieu to the only non-Christian Republican in Congress
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:54 (eleven years ago)
he just wasn't conservative enough
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:57 (eleven years ago)
the fuck is even happening in this country
― goole, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:58 (eleven years ago)
yeah, this is nuts. does the democrat stand a chance now? probably not.
experiencing some pleasant schadenfreude here ATM, but of course we should be careful what we wish for...
― display name changed. (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 June 2014 23:59 (eleven years ago)
the fractional chance of passing immigration reform is now 0.00%
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:00 (eleven years ago)
I would think this would be good news for the democrat, wouldn't it?
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:05 (eleven years ago)
yeah, but the district is so conservative that it may not add up to anything.
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:06 (eleven years ago)
What prevents Cantor from pulling a Lieberman and running as an independent?
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:06 (eleven years ago)
i mean cantor routinely won by 16-point margins. let's say the GOP loses 5% of support because tea party craziness. that's still 53-47.
acc to twitter the (presumably atrophied) dem party in that district got around to nominating their candidate yesterday.........it's a college professor.
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:07 (eleven years ago)
aaaaand Eric Cantor lost his primary.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:07 (eleven years ago)
dude
isn't the tea party guy a college prof too?!
xxpost
it's too late for cantor to get his name on a ballot. he could run as a write-in. that would be difficult. plus, he wouldn't be house majority leader no more.
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:08 (eleven years ago)
holy shit cooter done done it
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:08 (eleven years ago)
did cantor just phone this primary in? i'm sure if he had done a lot of campaigning he could have put this over the edge.
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:10 (eleven years ago)
― goole,
I know -- I had to spell it out to express my surprise.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:10 (eleven years ago)
no cantor took it seriously
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:11 (eleven years ago)
oh, then it's even more O_O
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:11 (eleven years ago)
NRO jubilant.
Bugg • a few seconds ago
Bravo, Dave Bratt. Let the word go forth to the shamnesty GOP Beltway hacks-YOU'RE DONE.We will not vote for Dem Lite. Border enforcement and no deals.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:12 (eleven years ago)
Making the rounds: according to Virginia law:
A candidate who loses a primary shall be prohibited from having his name on a general election ballot.
So, write-in or nothing.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:12 (eleven years ago)
wow guys did u hear cantor lost his primary?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:13 (eleven years ago)
no, tell us about it!
ok apparently both democrat and tea party dude teach At the Same University. wtf.
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:13 (eleven years ago)
reminds me of the shock when Tom Foley lost reelection in '94.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:13 (eleven years ago)
auslander raus
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:14 (eleven years ago)
curious if this was something beyond cooter's operation chaos or eric fucking cantor not being conservative enough. was there some specific grass roots bogeyman that felled him? is he pro-common core or something?
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:14 (eleven years ago)
ah, there it is - immigration
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:15 (eleven years ago)
dave brat: http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=47058
jack trammell: http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=1089383
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:15 (eleven years ago)
http://www.rmc.edu/default.aspx
here it is.
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:17 (eleven years ago)
oh, rmp, good looking out
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:18 (eleven years ago)
wow red peppers for both
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:18 (eleven years ago)
beat on the brat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HUGeA2lur4&feature=kp
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:19 (eleven years ago)
He changed the assignments almost everyday. he never had set schedule for anything. he was forgetful of quizzes. For his papers, no one ever understood what he wanted for us to do. he was almost never there when we needed help. he read the book in for students to follow and lastly, he graded very critically without first giving you guidlines.
i think the dem needs to tap this rich vein of campaign attack material
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:20 (eleven years ago)
http://37.media.tumblr.com/e4f6951eb28641a176b104d1f5dfa45d/tumblr_n6zaaoAdfl1qdmmiqo1_500.gif
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:21 (eleven years ago)
i guess in GOP land, cantor is relatively "moderate": http://www.heritageactionscorecard.com/members
jeezus
yeah, it's a mixed up, shook up world
― display name changed. (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:22 (eleven years ago)
It's all good, guys: Cantor can now make money
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:26 (eleven years ago)
watching FOX News now, it's clear they don't know how much glee to show -- or whether to show it.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:27 (eleven years ago)
He changed the assignments almost everyday. he never had set schedule for anything. he was forgetful of quizzes. For his papers, no one ever understood what he wanted for us to do. he was almost never there when we needed help. he read the book in for students to follow and lastly, he graded very critically without first giving you guidlines. wait a minute, i thought of something else: he refused to teach us about capitalization.
(Among other things, and ignoring typos so as not to incriminate myself.)
― clemenza, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:36 (eleven years ago)
peace god
― uppers epilepsy sh@kedown (The Reverend), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:45 (eleven years ago)
I keep waiting for the tipping point where some shadowy figure in the GOP finds a way to slam the brakes on the crazy train, but it never happens.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:48 (eleven years ago)
Reagan!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:53 (eleven years ago)
lol rev
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 00:54 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/noQDXnq.jpg
fuck this country btw
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:05 (eleven years ago)
A photo from the concession speech. He almost looks human.
http://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_358w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/06/11/Interactivity/Images/CROP-Virginia_Primary_Cantor-06b22.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
now he has to enter the disappointing "get richer even faster" phase of his life
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
The Zman • 21 minutes ago
But it will be back. The open borders fanatics are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't bereasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until America looks like Brazil.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
this is crazy - local dc media covers all the virginia primary stuff and nobody really talked about this race being competitive
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:07 (eleven years ago)
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:48 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark
basically been thinking about this for a good half hour or so and just don't see it happening anytime soon?
― Clay, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:10 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/costareports/status/476525976806256641
ok the wash post was on this a month agohttp://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/eric-cantors-tea-party-opponent-in-va-primary-may-be-picking-up-momentum/2014/05/13/1a2d92d0-d9d7-11e3-b745-87d39690c5c0_story.html
what is even happening. i never read the political blogs any more
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:18 (eleven years ago)
man as someone pretty familiar with that neck of the woods, though loooooong ago, not really surprised at all. great randy mac drama.
― 52 hertz so good (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:31 (eleven years ago)
Yeah I'd read that story at the time and filed it away under "Hmm, interesting." VERY interesting.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:33 (eleven years ago)
i guess i'm kinda shocked at how big a deal immigration is in virginia, that a total unknown could run a single-issue race against the hyper-conservative likely future speaker of the house and win.
― Clay, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:43 (eleven years ago)
i mean in arizona or whatever sure, but other than the standard raze it all to the ground apocalyptics against immigration on the right like is immigration even a problem in VA?
― Clay, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:46 (eleven years ago)
I think it's more the (relative) newness -- those there can help me more but as I understand it Latino immigration in particular only has started to hit big in the South beyond Texas over the past two decades, and there's a sizeable series of communities throughout Virginia now. So on top of the usual fear-and-loathing it's more being confronted with it beyond the abstract.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:47 (eleven years ago)
"Wait, actual people? My god we can't have that!"
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:48 (eleven years ago)
That said, more inside baseball from Good Ol' Erick Erickson, which I would read for the anecdotes that all pretty much say "Cantor and his staff were shitheads, fuck him."
http://www.redstate.com/2014/06/10/why-eric-cantor-lost/
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:54 (eleven years ago)
Of all the 'BUH?' pieces I want to read, Jennifer Rubin's will be the most entertaining.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:58 (eleven years ago)
not just immigration, also a streak of.. working for k st/lobbyists instead of his district. and i guess nobody likes him, they just assumed people would vote for him
there was some major drama just the other day in virginia politics - a democratic state senator resigned/cut a deal with the republicans at the last minute thus leaving governor terry mcauliffe without a dem majority and unable to expand medicaid to cover the uninsured. pretty shady
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:58 (eleven years ago)
Those comments are loads of fun.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:59 (eleven years ago)
Is there a dem challenging brat for the seat? I would guess no but ...
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 01:59 (eleven years ago)
oh hey what's the HANNITY spin on this i wonder
there is a dem challenger in the district. all i know from twitter is that he is also a college professor and is working on a vampire novel
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:01 (eleven years ago)
toddstarnes ✔ @toddstarnesFollow
Here's the message from Virginia: You either stand with Americans or you stand with the invaders.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:01 (eleven years ago)
in other news, we're gonna hear a lot more about Laura Ingraham in the coming days. I can hear the keys clacking as POLITICO scriveners rewrite the profiles.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:05 (eleven years ago)
Brat teaches economics at Randolph-Macon college, and won a $500,000 fellowship funded by libertarian banking millionaire John Allison to spread the word of Ayn Rand to impressionable college students.
chait is extra gleeful tonight.
― Clay, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:08 (eleven years ago)
tea party tuning in to the conservative radio b-team, probably thinks most of fox news is, like cantor, too liberal
this guy, brat, is on the air with hannity right now. i haven't been paying attention but it feels like hannity is trying to latch on to his candidacy and gloss over brat/tea party grassroots differences with the republican establishment
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:15 (eleven years ago)
er i mean i haven't been paying attention prior to just now to anything hannity has been saying on television
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:16 (eleven years ago)
probably was said before but can everyone shut the fuck up about tea party vs establishment narrative which made no goddamn sense
this race proves it, and not one fucking person mentioned it as a possibility.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:20 (eleven years ago)
this is actually p funny
Jonah Goldberg ✔ @JonahNROFollowDraft Boehner Statement: "I for one welcome our new talk radio overlords."
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:27 (eleven years ago)
A letter Sully posted:
I live in the 7th District in Virginia, I am a Democrat and I voted for David Brat in the primary. It is an open primary. There has been a whisper campaign going on among the Democrats in the district for the last few weeks and it resulted in many democrats coming out to vote for Brat today. We felt especially encouraged after the 7th district committee nominated Jack Trammell to be the Democratic candidate for the seat last Sunday. We now feel we at least have a fair chance at winning it. By the way, Jack Trammell is a professor at the same small college as Brat, Randolph-Macon.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:30 (eleven years ago)
meanwhile, maryland governor's race democratic primary ad: we can have all these wonderful things including equal pay and fund it by legalizing and taxing marijuana
maryland >>> virginia imo
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:31 (eleven years ago)
a gop-leaning strategist on twitter was going through some returns data & speculating about crossover effect of dem voters in an open primary - brat got the highest margins in the precincts that went the most for romney, *and* those precincts that went the most for obama, so it's possible.. but no one knows facts yet
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 02:36 (eleven years ago)
An interesting perspective on this from billmon on Twitter:
"This reminds me a bit of when Speaker Tom Foley lost in 1994 GOP wave. Many voters in his district thought new guy would also be speaker...were surprised to learn they'd just gone from being most important congressional district in the country to being least important."
― Humorist (horse) (誤訳侮辱), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 12:38 (eleven years ago)
I guess I should have seen this coming after maybe a year of seeing nutbags throw in Cantor's name when ranting about liberals.
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 13:06 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/10/david-brat-just-beat-eric-cantor-who-is-he/
Brat also cited immigration as a difference-maker in the campaign, saying politicians are beholden to the Chamber of Commerce. “They want cheap labor, and that’s going to lower wages for everybody else,” he said.
As if maintaining the status quo on immigration is going to help anyone regarding wages
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:06 (eleven years ago)
Ladies and gentlemen, an economist
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:07 (eleven years ago)
but where's the birth certificate, pt. ii?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ted-cruz-tea-party-favourite-renounces-canadian-citizenship-1.2671479?cmp=rss
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:09 (eleven years ago)
He's so charming and really knows how to incorporate real world examples to keep the class exciting and relateable. He change assignments a lot and sometimes it's unclear what he wants you to do. Plus he's total eye candy!!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:09 (eleven years ago)
man I haven't gotten a chili pepper in years
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:10 (eleven years ago)
expect we’ll hear some voices today arguing that the South Carolina results were the more important in terms of the future direction of the GOP, and that Cantor’s loss should be written off as the product of poor constituent services, bad consultants and pollsters, or devious crossover-voting Democrats.
Well, there’s no doubt Lindsey Graham is a better retail politician than Eric Cantor. But more to the point, his method of coping with the Tea Party hordes looks to be far more effective. Cantor sought to slowly bring the “constitutional conservatives” along into a “reform conservative” project that would supplant the existing GOP ideology with a more positive “populist” agenda to remake government rather than simply seeking to destroy it. Graham chose a couple of big stupid right-wing themes (Benghazi!) and whaled away at them, buying himself the political space to be heretical on other issues. It seems to have worked, but that’s cold comfort to conservatives who want the GOP to be built on something more durable than Benghazi!
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_06/meanwhile_down_in_south_cackal050724.php
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:24 (eleven years ago)
man the House isn't even going to be able to get through roll call for the next couple years is it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:29 (eleven years ago)
Graham realized the threat years ago and has rehearsed ever since.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:30 (eleven years ago)
This sounds right:
A Cantor loss will send a chill down the spine of so many House GOPers contemplating compromise," tweeted my old colleague and friend Zachary Goldfarb. "A disaster for Obama." That seems...wrong. House GOPers weren't seriously contemplating compromise before Cantor's loss and they're not contemplating it after his loss. In terms of legislative achievements, Obama's second term has been done for some time. But in terms of protecting his legislative achievements — and protecting coming executive branch actions like his proposed climate rules — what matters most for Obama is that a Democrat wins the presidency in 2016. Tonight made that a little more likely.
Some on the left are envious of the Tea Party's success at cowing Republicans. "The Left endorsed Cuomo; the Right successfully primaried the sitting House Majority Leader = how the country keeps moving to the right," tweeted Max Berger. Others voiced similar sentiments. But this isn't how the country keeps moving right. This is how the country keeps moving left.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:44 (eleven years ago)
We've got this weird hybrid of Affordable Care Act and privatization in Arkansas that's actually been praised by both sides for being a pragmatic way of handling the new changes. It passed easily the first time when the legislature was run by Democrats. It barely passed again last time when the legislature was run by Republicans (with some concessions like the state wouldn't visibly promote the plan or advertise it, yeah wtf.)
And now the hard-liner guys from the sticks are getting eaten alive in the primaries by even harder-line Tea Party candidates, mad that those incumbents "gave in" to Barack Obama. It's depressingly fun to watch the moderate GOPers watch all this unfold.
― pplains, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
yeah that's otm Alfred - where is that from?
GOP just marginalizing itself more and more
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:49 (eleven years ago)
the Honorable Ezra Klein
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:50 (eleven years ago)
America's moving to the left huh? LMK when we get to 1975.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
The public is much further to the left than Washington: dealing with income inequality, abortion rights, homo marriage, giving the kids of their Mexican housekeepers visas, and so on.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:04 (eleven years ago)
yes, and as Washington is creeping twd police-state oligarchy i'm not excited about it
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
If you're still alive in 2080, come to Florida. We can die together.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
oh i wd jump off the roof if i made it to 2035
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
the Right successfully primaried the sitting House Majority Leader = how the country keeps moving to the right,"
yea i agree w/ outic & alfred, i see white conservatives getting even more hard line, not the rest of the country. shit's gonna get worse too, as the white majority decreases it will become more reactionary
― marcos, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
yeah idk.
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:19 (eleven years ago)
a liberalism built on administrative tinkering while the legislature becomes increasingly reactionary doesn't sound like a good long term plan.
i mean frankly it sounds like talk from the right after bush's 2nd term victory, a "plebiscite" that justifies everything for four year on either side of it
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:22 (eleven years ago)
Making gender and sexual orientation less relevant if you are white and solvent is not the same thing thing as moving the country to the left.
― Three Word Username, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
I mean who is planning this
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
being white in 2014 means not being solvent
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 16:50 (eleven years ago)
But if you work hard after debt and give speeches like Bill and Hillary you can maintain that two mansion lifestyle
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:00 (eleven years ago)
no one is planning that, sounds like the latest lib rationalization to 'proudly' continue voting for the Democratic party
xxp
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:00 (eleven years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:30 PM (Yesterday)
hm, http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/eric-cantor-poll-immigration-lose-107704.html
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
yeah, no one is planning it, it's just where we are
klein's hot take is just not convincing to me. a world where eric cantor gets knocked off from the right is pretty fucking scary. the only 'comforting' interp imo is from your jonathan bernstein types who say that flukey shit just happens sometimes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:05 (eleven years ago)
while the legislature becomes increasingly reactionary
Mainstream Dem machine has to figure out how to win non-presidential year elections, or at least win enough to stay competitive till a presidential year
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
@ggreenwald 72% of voters in Cantor's district said they ****favored**** immigration reform http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/eric-cantor-poll-immigration-lose-107704.html … - need another storyline
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:17 (eleven years ago)
greenwald is that dumb, jeez
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
72% of voters in that district didn't get up and vote in this GOP primary at all
greenwald and others have been pushing the line that cantor was felled because brat's anti-bank and anti-NSA message works. i'd be happy if it were true but let's not kid ourselves
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:23 (eleven years ago)
refreshing take - http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/what-does-cantor-s-defeat-mean-nobody-knows
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
Senate races aren't House races, for one thing
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 17:46 (eleven years ago)
Ponnoru's often one of the least crazy conservative pundits.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
apparently cooter's operation chaos didn't swing the district (apparently there's never actually been a demonstrable case of opposite party voters sabotaging an open primary). it's been interesting to see in different races the various little schisms in the movement, in some races club for growth and norquist are radicals at the gates, in others they're the establishment liberal heretics sellouts. not sure i buy the country is moving further to the left either. ratatattat it's dave brat might end up just another clown on the back bench but there are more and more of these in the house and they're forcing the 'sane grownup' republicans (yknow, the one's that are merely to the right of newt gingrich) to adapt and overcome. w/ the hastert rule you could argue this clown caucus has more power than dems in the house already.
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
the country can move left w/o actually affecting the composition of congress much (is the problem)
― iatee, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:05 (eleven years ago)
^^ exactly
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
I mean, the country's "to the left" of 98 percent of GOP House districts.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:07 (eleven years ago)
the hastert rule and the quasi parliamentary system its ushered in isnt helped by the eradication of earmarks either.. party higher ups used to be able to threaten their members to fall in line if it meant cutting off the pork. its a little bit harder to do these days.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
the one thing that would scare me if i was the gop is the fail-safe plan they'd eventually be able to pass immigration reform and get out of their demographic doom spiral is looking less and less likely. it was flawed before (possibly too late plus there is some polling showing that latino voters aren't dem solely or primarily cuz of that issue)(ie passing reform doesn't get them that market of 'natural conservatives', it merely makes it possible they can even begin to appeal to them) but now it looks like they couldn't even get to the point of passing it, they can't even attempt a hail mary. they could point to 'well the dems haven't passed immigration reform/done anything for you' (and they can point to increased deportations under obama) but dems would at least be able to campaign on it openly to latino market and sell it to moderate whites as an attempt to do 'something' about the 'problem', tying into branding of dems as party of pragmatism. it could get to the point where they have to wait for enough hispanic voters to decide ok we're white and vote on the basis of low taxes fuck all else.
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:26 (eleven years ago)
man and Cubans are dying quickly.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
Cubans feel affronted when referred to ad Hispanic or "non-white."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:49 (eleven years ago)
you mean Miami Cubans right?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
mark cubans
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 18:59 (eleven years ago)
cantor's pollster blames cooter:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/eric-cantor-s-pollster-tries-to-explain-why-his-survey-showed-cantor-up-34-points-20140611
david brat, academic: kind of a crank:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/06/david-brat-christian-rights-favorite-economist.html?mid=twitter_dailyintelligencer
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 19:22 (eleven years ago)
haha cantor's pollster trying to cover his ass, love that subhed
― balls, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 19:30 (eleven years ago)
ah dammit i should have said "cantor's pollster fingers cooter"
― goole, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
what's cooter than coot
ICE COOT
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 19:55 (eleven years ago)
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/eric-cantors-loss-was-like-an-earthquake/
what a clown
― caek, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 20:47 (eleven years ago)
http://www.salon.com/2014/06/11/eric_cantors_victorious_opponent_has_no_idea_how_to_answer_basic_policy_questions/
“Where are you on the minimum wage?” Todd asked. “Do you believe in it, and would you raise it?”“Minimum wage? Nah; I’m a free-market guy,” Brat responded. “Our labor markets right now are already distorted from too many regulations … Distortion after distortion after distortion and we wonder why our labor markets are broken …”“So should there be a minimum wage in your opinion?” Todd pressed.“Um, I don’t have a well-crafted response on that one,” Brat said, haltingly. “All I know is that if you take the long-run graph over 200 years of the wage rate, it cannot differ from your nation’s productivity. Right? So you can’t make up wage rates.”Brat found another question, this one about whether the U.S. should arm rebels in Syria, even more troublesome. Instead of answering Todd, he admitted he wasn’t expecting to have to speak to such weighty issues.“Hey, Chuck, I thought we were just going to chat today about the celebratory aspects,” Brat responded. “I’d love to go through all of this but my mind is — I love all the policy questions but I just wanted to talk about the victory ahead and I wanted to thank everybody that worked so hard on my campaign. I’m happy to take policy issues at any time, I just wanted to call out a thanks to everybody today.”
“Minimum wage? Nah; I’m a free-market guy,” Brat responded. “Our labor markets right now are already distorted from too many regulations … Distortion after distortion after distortion and we wonder why our labor markets are broken …”
“So should there be a minimum wage in your opinion?” Todd pressed.
“Um, I don’t have a well-crafted response on that one,” Brat said, haltingly. “All I know is that if you take the long-run graph over 200 years of the wage rate, it cannot differ from your nation’s productivity. Right? So you can’t make up wage rates.”
Brat found another question, this one about whether the U.S. should arm rebels in Syria, even more troublesome. Instead of answering Todd, he admitted he wasn’t expecting to have to speak to such weighty issues.
“Hey, Chuck, I thought we were just going to chat today about the celebratory aspects,” Brat responded. “I’d love to go through all of this but my mind is — I love all the policy questions but I just wanted to talk about the victory ahead and I wanted to thank everybody that worked so hard on my campaign. I’m happy to take policy issues at any time, I just wanted to call out a thanks to everybody today.”
― Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:43 (eleven years ago)
hahahaha this clown
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
"Hey, Chuck, I thought we were just going to chat today about the celebratory aspects"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:51 (eleven years ago)
I don't know how large a factor is was in the end, but I've heard from several people (friends and friends of friends) that due to Virginia's open primaries, lots of people just wanted to vote Cantor out and worry about the general when the general comes around.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:54 (eleven years ago)
if he's really unelectable, surely the dem stands a good chance of beating him? and i assume he'll have minimal incumbent advantages. could be a great opportunity to flip the seat?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:54 (eleven years ago)
(i'm not convinced he unelectable tho - i think he's probably very very smart and will probably have carefully presented policy answers by the time the general rolls around)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:55 (eleven years ago)
Doesn't look like a factor, Johnny.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 21:57 (eleven years ago)
I think it was Chris Hayes last night who reported that the DNC really only decided to make an effort with Jack Trammell over the weekend when it looked like Cantor might have a hard time winning. I don't think even they suspected Brat would hammer Cantor.
Nobody seems wild about Trammell, but he was kind of a silent candidate until just now (the 7th hasn't seated a Dem since 1971).
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:03 (eleven years ago)
(the 7th hasn't seated a Dem since 1971).
I did some exhaustive 5-minute research on Wikipedia and that guy now calls himself a close confidante of Dick Cheney.
― pplains, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
Oh lord.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:07 (eleven years ago)
guys only had about 150k worth of campaign cash to devise his crackpot policy ideas.. once the heritage action and crossroads gps money starts to pour in by the millions he should be ready to go
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:31 (eleven years ago)
mission accomplished!http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2655977/ISIS-militants-march-Baghdad-trademark-bullet-head-gets-way-control-north.htmlso can we invade again?
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
obama said nothing is off the table but lol @ anyone who thinks he plans to militarily intervene in iraq
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)
i wonder what bush would do
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
third time's the charm
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
dudes entire legacy at this point is obamacare and not voting for the war in iraq so i don't see him jettisoning one of his two things
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:42 (eleven years ago)
I wouldn't be surprised by limited airstrikes, that sort of thing.
― o. nate, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:43 (eleven years ago)
every president loooooooooves limited airstrikes, they're like a good beej
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
i feel like we probably have an ethical obligation to do something since we fucked their country up (tho i'm not sure we're to blame for ISIS), but is there anything we can do that won't just make it worse?
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
limited airstrikes are pretty hott...
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:45 (eleven years ago)
is there anything we can do that won't just make it worse?
Good question. Maybe Iran will help out if we can't/won't:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/06/iran-vows-combat-terrorism-iraq-2014612113247864941.html
― o. nate, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:56 (eleven years ago)
any help Iran gives is not going to make things better. really the only thing that can save Iraq is some kind of Sunni/Shiite governing alliance but Iran is obv committed to keeping the current government in power and looking at the great job they've done intervening in Syria + Lebanon i can't think of any reason why their intervention in Iraq will go any better.
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
bc tbph, when it comes to disastrous loss of human life and never ending conflict quagmires Iran kicks the US's ass
"Iraqi officials told the Guardian that two divisions of Iraqi soldiers - roughly 30,000 men - simply turned and ran in the face of the assault by an insurgent force of just 800 fighters."
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/12/5803416/isis-one-sentence-iraqi-army
― o. nate, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:31 (eleven years ago)
we've been discussing it a little over here: Rolling MENA 2014
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)
Ah, I didn't know what MENA stands for, so I missed that one.
― o. nate, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:33 (eleven years ago)
sorry, i have an obscurantism fetish :(
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
when it comes to disastrous loss of human life and never ending conflict quagmires Iran kicks the US's ass
are you counting when the Shah was our bastard or not?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)
i'm gonna say no, but i'd have to hear a broader case for a) the foreign interventions of the Shah, and b) US participation in encouraging said adventurism. i'm not familiar w/ either.
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
remind me again what quagmires the shah got into as well. not sure dhofar counts, at least for iran.
― balls, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
morbz inspired me to read wiki and now i'm onto the white revolution page. i can see why the US supported the Shah so fervently, dude was a baller.
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
The White Revolution consisted of 19 elements that were introduced over a period of 15 years, with the first 6 introduced in 1962 and put to a national referendum on January 26, 1963:
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
seems like mostly great stuff to me ^^^
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)
fuck you a zillion x
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:57 (eleven years ago)
for an ignoramus you have some real passion!
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 18:58 (eleven years ago)
love it when morbs just makes up shit according to whatever drug addled bigotries are swirling in his mind at the moment and when you ask him wtf he's talking about he just gets hurt and lashes out
― balls, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:01 (eleven years ago)
both of you go read a fuckin' book about the shah
for a racist fundie you sure are tireless, M
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:04 (eleven years ago)
is there a particular book about the Shah you'd recommend morbzy?
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:05 (eleven years ago)
morbs can you recommend a good book about each of the many quagmires the shah got trapped in?
― balls, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:07 (eleven years ago)
lol xp
no, but he has a great quote he once heard secondhand attributed to noam chomsky
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:07 (eleven years ago)
could both of you plz die before me?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)
gosh, don't you think wishing death on me is a little over-the-top broseph?
― Mordy, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:11 (eleven years ago)
kinda want to see if carmelo actually signs w/ the heat so 'before you' is out i think
― balls, Thursday, 12 June 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
More fun facts re the Cantor loss to Brat:
Cantor’s campaign and leadership PAC spent about $170,000 at classic D.C. powerhouse restaurants including Bobby Van’s Steakhouse and BLT Steak, according to FEC records. By comparison, his primary opponent Dave Brat spent about $122,000 in his entire campaign.
The Politico writer's lead sentence on the story:
Tabs at fancy D.C. steakhouses and the high overhead for Eric Cantor’s campaign drew plenty of mockery in the aftermath of his primary loss.
But lobbyists and other big donors generally don’t cut $5,000 checks over a barbacoa burrito bowl.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/why-eric-cantor-chose-bobby-vans-107749.html#ixzz34SNhq2r2
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 12 June 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
it's a good thing taxes are low on the rich, cuz otherwise how could we afford to fund these campaigns?
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 12 June 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
shah is complicated. policies would shift depending on who was in the government and which way the wind was blowing. he had a tendency to wait until people seemed to be getting particularly restless then instituting widespread reform. then, often enough, he would stall on certain reforms until things got restive again. rinse, repeat.
things were actually looking sort of brighter in iran in last years before revolution but that's often when revolutions occur. i know some iranian liberals/secularists who campaigned against the shah and participated in the revolution until it was taken over by islamists who now privately agree that things were better under the shah than they have been under the islamic republic.
anyway.
― I thought we were just going to chat today about the celebratory as (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)
a million xposts
http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/legacyimg/2009/07/Shah-of-Shahs.jpg
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Thursday, 12 June 2014 22:20 (eleven years ago)
Almost all the Iranians I know preferred it under the shah. Don't think that is in any way a controversial or even incorrect idea. Doesn't mean that the shah wasn't a dictator, nor that the western coup against the elected government in 53, and the ongoing support for the shah, wasn't shameful and, really, idiotic.
― Frederik B, Thursday, 12 June 2014 22:40 (eleven years ago)
it's controversial insofar as you can't really speak it publicly.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2014 22:59 (eleven years ago)
lol Kevin McCarthy is not a conservative apparently
hilarious that a jackass from a state where the GOP is almost completely powerless is gonna be no. 2 in the House
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 12 June 2014 23:30 (eleven years ago)
i loved him in Invasion of the Body Snatchers
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2014 23:32 (eleven years ago)
wow jeb hensarling passed. i wonder if he realized his name is fucking ridiculous.
― balls, Thursday, 12 June 2014 23:39 (eleven years ago)
Almost all the Iranians I know preferred it under the shah.
Is this a function of "Iranians I know"? I mean, a lot of Iranians in the West are those who left Iran because of the revolution.
― popchips: the next snapple? (seandalai), Friday, 13 June 2014 00:04 (eleven years ago)
was gonna say - if u live in America there's a pretty obvious reason most of the Iranians you know might be pro-shah
― Οὖτις, Friday, 13 June 2014 00:05 (eleven years ago)
no i mean iranians in iran
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2014 07:53 (eleven years ago)
i mean, irania
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2014 07:54 (eleven years ago)
http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/15/73/86/157386a3ce6108206eb393dbb0add5b0.jpg
"These are the Iranians I know..."
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Friday, 13 June 2014 13:09 (eleven years ago)
sorta like Batista-loving Cuban-Americans
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 June 2014 13:13 (eleven years ago)
ie every despot has his admiring bourgeois Mordys
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 June 2014 13:18 (eleven years ago)
Conservative US columnists always assert that if only Obama had publicly supported the 2009 Iranian Green Revolution, it would have suceeded
― curmudgeon, Friday, 13 June 2014 14:19 (eleven years ago)
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/elections/2014/06/10/gail-ernst-remarks/10302971/
Iowa Republican spin in this article is impressive re A joke about shooting an ex and a reference to a female federal official as a "traitorous skank" remained on a Facebook page belonging to the husband of U.S. Senate candidate Joni Ernst for months.
Democratic operatives took screen shots of the comments made by Republican Gail Ernst and shared them with The Des Moines Register today, a day after national news outlets reported Monday that he called Hillary Clinton a "hag" in a Facebook post in May 2013.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 13 June 2014 15:35 (eleven years ago)
maybe he meant "hag" as in "haggard" as in "merle" as in "merle's girls" as in an authentic downhome country lady? because republicans are devout christians
berghdazi!
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 13 June 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
let us lol:http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-tea-party-republicans-house-leadership-hopes-turn-into-disappointment/2014/06/13/0a782b58-f303-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html?hpid=z3
― Οὖτις, Friday, 13 June 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
i posted this in the MENA thread but now that it turns out one of the teenagers is an american citizen it's probably relevant here too:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/14/world/middleeast/3-israeli-teenagers-said-to-be-kidnapped-in-west-bank.html
i wonder whether the US is going to negotiate the citizen's release personally
― Mordy, Friday, 13 June 2014 18:50 (eleven years ago)
interesting that the WP refers to both conservatives and republicans as distinct groups. that does seem to be the way this whole mess is headed. i anticipate this will play out most entertainingly when speaker is voted on (next year?) since the conservatives really do not like boehner
― building a desert (art), Friday, 13 June 2014 19:18 (eleven years ago)
I don't think there's any actual ideological divide between Boehner/McCarthy/Cantor/the "Establishment" and Hensarling/Amash/the "Tea Party". The divide, as implicitly indicated in the WP article, is between those in the party who understand how government works - the actual nuts and bolts of legislating, maintaining power, etc. - and those who don't have a fucking clue.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 13 June 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
It's even starker: those who want the government to work, albeit in their interests, and those who get elected so they can show their constituents that state and federal government is not supposed to function therefore they're gonna gum up the works.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 13 June 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
bingo.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 13 June 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
GOP House Seat: the only job you can get by saying how terrible you will be at it
― Οὖτις, Friday, 13 June 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
soto and shakey otm
― balls, Friday, 13 June 2014 19:32 (eleven years ago)
Won't this be fun--
http://m.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-elite-donor-summit-featuring-2016-gop-hopefuls-a-longing-for-romney-to-run-again/2014/06/13/0d27d8f0-f27a-11e3-9ebc-2ee6f81ed217_story.html?tid=HP_more
PARK CITY, Utah — Mitt Romney’s ideas summit here was intended to be a passing of the torch to the Republican Party’s would-be saviors, with five potential 2016 presidential candidates jetting in to schmooze with many of the GOP’s biggest donors and present their agendas for the country’s future.
Instead, the scene at a luxury resort in the Rocky Mountains quickly became a Romney revival. Minutes after the 2012 Republican presidential nominee welcomed his 300 guests, Joe Scarborough, the MSNBC host and former GOP congressman, urged them to begin a “Draft Romney” movement in 2016.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 14 June 2014 16:47 (eleven years ago)
http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/4834/7099244_1.jpg?v=8C9936228B405B0
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 14 June 2014 16:48 (eleven years ago)
Third time's the charm for Mittens!
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 14 June 2014 16:51 (eleven years ago)
http://www.audiobooksonline.com/media/ss_size1/Mormon-in-the-White-House-Hugh-Hewitt-unabridged-Blackstone-Audio-books.jpg
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 14 June 2014 16:54 (eleven years ago)
http://quadium.net/random/fark/centipedes-in-my-vagina.jpg
― balls, Saturday, 14 June 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
― goole, Saturday, 14 June 2014 17:58 (eleven years ago)
Sure, let’s go back to Iraq.
Oh, yes, let us do that.
I’ll dig out my uniform and strap on my pistol and gird up my sword and ride into battle yet again.
Just so long as Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Paul Ryan, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and every single one of those powdered, Botoxed talking heads at Fox News are in the vanguard. That’s right, you cowards, you put on a uniform and you lead the charge this time around. The Koch brothers and Mitt Romney can pay for it, every goddamned penny, we’ll bleed them until they’re dry and then we’ll pull the gold fillings from their teeth to pay for it right along with the rest of their Wall Street cronies. You fuckers got rich off the last one, you can damned well pay for this one. And when you run out of money, we’ll take your blood, fair’s fair.
Strap John McCain into the cockpit of an A-4 Skyhawk and let him fly air cover.
http://www.stonekettle.com/2014/06/absolutely-nothing.html?m=1
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 15 June 2014 13:51 (eleven years ago)
^ goes against the natural order of the universe. we all know that god intends the old and powerful to suck the blood of the young and the biddable to the end of time.
― Aimless, Sunday, 15 June 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
someone armchair hawks on my FB feed pissing me off lately
― I dunno. (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2014 23:06 (eleven years ago)
I say we drop Bush and Cheney into Mosul from a helicopter and watch the tide turn
same morons who less than a year ago were demanding we go to war in syria to fight for these monsters cuz of 'credibility' now demanding we go to war in iraq against these monsters cuz of 'credibility'. gall. the american public, while not actually wanting to go to war in ukraine or syria or iraq, nevertheless buys these bullshit 'serious' foreign policy arguments enough that obama's foreign policy is what hurts him most in the polls right now. they'll get their 'credible', 'strong' president soon enough.
― balls, Monday, 16 June 2014 00:41 (eleven years ago)
just think about about the brand damage to Strong Credibility when Poppy Bush dies this year
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 16 June 2014 00:42 (eleven years ago)
it appears we have captured mr. #benghazi. glad that's all taken care of now.
― goole, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 17:55 (eleven years ago)
But apparently Obama is planning on trying him in the US, instead of torturing him first in Libya and then just locking him away on an island somewhere
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)
wait a second. i thought obama was mr. benghazi, and planned the attack to trap romney into looking bad for smirking at the deaths of americans. did obama capture himself?
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 18:58 (eleven years ago)
It was Obama's evil twin brother Ralph
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:01 (eleven years ago)
no, the true story is that obama knew about the benghazi attack weeks before it happened, but he and his team did nothing to stop it because they couldn't wait to hear about the deaths of the U.S. diplomats and have a big party to celebrate. we should view this latest development with suspicion because he probably ordered the capture of a FAKE mr. benghazi just to distract from the pursuit of the real mr. benghazi, who is probably himself. in fact i bet the fake mr. benghazi (fakeghazi) is probably a U.S. patriot that obama wants to punish
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
http://assets-s3.usmagazine.com/uploads/assets/articles/49151-character-actor-ben-gazzara-dies-at-81/1328370241_ben-gazzara-240.jpg
I thought Mr. Benghazi was dead too?
― pplains, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:05 (eleven years ago)
the natural tea party line on this is "as bogus as when oj went to look for the real killer!"
― 52 hertz so good (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:06 (eleven years ago)
Here's the Fox News story:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/17/sources-benghazi-attack-suspect-captured-en-route-to-us/
"I am pleased that Khattala is finally in U.S. custody, and I am grateful for the military, intelligence, and law enforcement professionals who helped capture him," Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., said in a statement, adding: "Rather than rushing to read him his Miranda rights and telling him he has the right to remain silent, I hope the administration will focus on collecting the intelligence necessary to prevent future attacks and to find other terrorists responsible for the Benghazi attacks."
Some Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ted Cruz of Texas, said the suspect should be sent to Guantanamo Bay.
U.S. officials, without saying whether the suspect has been read his Miranda rights, said he has undergone an "intelligence interrogation."
Khattala faces three counts in the federal complaint against him, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:21 (eleven years ago)
comments to that story are a nice snapshot of state of the art redneck delusions
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:40 (eleven years ago)
"Obama will just let him go." (plus many, many variations of the same)
"I think they've had him for a long time and were just waiting to use him as a distraction." (several variations)
"He's a Muslim, He took the oath on the Koran." (!!!)
― Aimless, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 19:58 (eleven years ago)
http://m.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-heritages-ugly-benghazi-panel/2014/06/16/b8bd423c-f5a3-11e3-a606-946fd632f9f1_story.html?hpid=z3
― the late great, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
there's already some "push back" (fuck that phrase btw) about that: the right and dylan byers lol saying milbank mischaracterized the event.
but video is out there somewhere.
― goole, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 20:53 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/479001431060385794
― goole, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:11 (eleven years ago)
lol:
Jeet Heer @HeerJeet 9m
11. About Byers critique I'll just say that when I want close-reading textual analysis, I'll stick to Leavis and Empson.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:14 (eleven years ago)
interesting take on the current political situation
― odd proggy geezer (Moodles), Tuesday, 17 June 2014 21:59 (eleven years ago)
standard 2nd term stuff afaict
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 22:17 (eleven years ago)
i can't seem to locate the appropriate thread, but:
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has canceled six federal trademark registrations for the name of the Washington http://images.chron.com/blogs/askacat/hatcat.JPG, ruling that the name is “disparaging to Native Americans” and thus cannot be trademarked under federal law that prohibits the protection of offensive or disparaging language.
http://thinkprogress.org/default/2014/06/18/3450333/in-landmark-decision-us-patent-office-cancels-trademark-for-http://images.chron.com/blogs/askacat/hatcat.JPG-football-team/
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 14:08 (eleven years ago)
lol sorry, the link won't work but replace it with your favorite racist football team name
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 14:09 (eleven years ago)
sweet
― famous instagram God (waterface), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 14:20 (eleven years ago)
god i love hatcat
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
does the IRS scandal have legs? the latest excuses for not finding emails make them look super guilty of... something. on the other hand I've worked for big companies and I'm not really all that surprised that they would completely loose server backups of communication. I'd just think the government worked more efficiently with it's information. (ha).
― akm, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 19:34 (eleven years ago)
you're familiar with the VA scandal, right?
― famous instagram God (waterface), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 19:36 (eleven years ago)
I read that the emails in question were lost when her computer died long before this became an issue. Plus, not that this justifies it either, but the Bush administration also lost some emails sought for an investigation, and the Bush administration CIA happily boasted about destroying evidence.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 19:40 (eleven years ago)
Here: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/gop-fumes-over-missing-lerner-emails
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
My fave current scandal is that the Obama administration purposely timed the capture of the Benghazi ringleader to coincide with Hillary's book tour (Rush L., among others, said it so it has to be true)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
when you actually lay out the process by which the emails get lost, things look much less shady:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/16/heres-how-the-irs-lost-emails-from-key-witness-lois-lerner/
― akm, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:12 (eleven years ago)
The Alfred-posted Maddow blogpost above shows how its not that shady too
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:16 (eleven years ago)
lol @ Republicans trying to understand how e-mail work
isn't it just stuck in a pipe somewhere
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:17 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/06/18/politicos-reporting-disaster/
Milbank responds to Politico's Byers for saying Milbank misrepresented what happened at a Benghazi discussion:
Byers wrote, based on his perusal of the video, that Saba Ahmed, the woman in an Islamic head covering whom I reported had been taunted by panelists and audience members, “didn’t appear at all troubled or upset at the end of the exchange.” The footage on Byers’s computer screen also indicated to him that she “does not seem to have been ‘taunted.’ ”
But had he been there, Byers needn’t have relied on appearances: He could have asked Ahmed himself, as I did. She told me she felt “targeted” by those in the room. And no wonder: She had just endured a raised-voice tirade directed at her by panelist Brigitte Gabriel, who had asked Ahmed’s citizenship, condemned her for taking the limelight, tossed in a Nazi Germany comparison and disparaged the very notion of “peaceful” Muslims – all for Ahmed’s sin of pointing out that not all Muslims are evil and that Muslims weren’t represented on the panel. The diatribe brought most of the 150 in the room to their feet, and they gave Gabriel two raucous rounds of applause lasting 28 and 17 seconds.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:23 (eleven years ago)
isn't it enough that heritage let this muslim woman in in the first place? what more do you libby libs want?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
Byers, alas, may never have the experience. He reports that he’s moving to California, where it will be just as easy to cover journalism the way he has covered it from Virginia. They have armchairs on the West Coast, too.
http://cdn.niketalk.com/5/5d/5d356f06_coldblooded.jpeg
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 21:02 (eleven years ago)
http://www.businessinsider.com/chuck-todd-obama-presidency-over-poll-says-2014-6
Chuck Todd based on 1 new poll
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 19 June 2014 14:49 (eleven years ago)
the "obama" presidency never began in the first place because his name's "soetero" and he was born elsewhere. i've been trying to tell people that for years now
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 19 June 2014 14:54 (eleven years ago)
it wasn't a presidency, it was an imperial communist takeover of our country, of course
― akm, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:01 (eleven years ago)
his presidency is kind over in that he can't do much to influence or pass legislation, but we knew that.
i don't mean in this instance in particular, but i don't know how anyone can take chuck todd or bob schaefer or any of those other network bozos seriously.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:08 (eleven years ago)
oh christ
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
whoops wrong thread, but, sure
?
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:17 (eleven years ago)
You know what else is over? THE STYLE FOR MEN TO WEAR A GOATEE.
― pplains, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:18 (eleven years ago)
NEVER!
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
meet me on the field of beard combat
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_OzXJuNyMIKE/S0DtmIpqnmI/AAAAAAAABJY/am-rGYeyswc/s1600-h/BL_VERTICAL_beardly3_war_sm.jpg
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 19 June 2014 15:58 (eleven years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0dsi1wusyNc/Tun_ac8jrKI/AAAAAAAAETk/mkvVsH8NdAo/s1600/jay%252C+no+shirt+in+portland+hotel+with+beard.jpg
I would like to see Chuck Todd's body blown apart once O starts firing drone payloads domestically
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 June 2014 16:04 (eleven years ago)
i have a pipe dream that obama's last major legislative push will be to move cannabis off the schedule 1 controlled substance but i know very well that it won't happen. a deprived stoner can dream though can't he?
― marcos, Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:08 (eleven years ago)
I posted this in the other thread, but here is good, too.
Ron Paul's gunna be in a movie
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:56 (eleven years ago)
The film also will feature several other prominent conservative personalities with little or no acting experience
OH COME NOW
(regardless of the pct of shit these guys believe, it's common off-mic to refer to it as their "act")
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
it's the nepotism that is their real american birthright
"the _______ will feature several prominent conservatives [and/or their children] with little or no _____ experience"
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 19 June 2014 18:22 (eleven years ago)
State Prosecutors Allege Scott Walker At Center Of 'Criminal Scheme'
State prosecutors in Wisconsin have alleged that Gov. Scott Walker (R) was part of an effort to illegally coordinate conservative groups' fundraising during the 2011 and 2012 recall elections in the state, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.The revelation was contained in documents unsealed Thursday by a federal judge. In the documents, according to the Journal Sentinel, prosecutors described a "criminal scheme" to skirt state election laws by Walker and his campaign, as well as two of Walker's deputies: R.J. Johnson and Deborah Jordahl. Walker and his deputies allegedly helped raise money and control spending through 12 conservative groups during the recalls.The Journal Sentinel highlighted one email exchange contained in the documents: a note from Walker to Republican political strategist and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove in which Walker described Johnson's role coordinating the activity."Bottom-line: R.J. helps keep in place a team that is wildly successful in Wisconsin. We are running 9 recall elections and it will be like 9 congressional markets in every market in the state (and Twin Cities)," Walker wrote to Rove on May 4, 2011.The documents were unsealed as part of a lawsuit brought by the conservative group Wisconsin Club for Growth, which has been seeking to have the investigation shut down.
The revelation was contained in documents unsealed Thursday by a federal judge. In the documents, according to the Journal Sentinel, prosecutors described a "criminal scheme" to skirt state election laws by Walker and his campaign, as well as two of Walker's deputies: R.J. Johnson and Deborah Jordahl. Walker and his deputies allegedly helped raise money and control spending through 12 conservative groups during the recalls.
The Journal Sentinel highlighted one email exchange contained in the documents: a note from Walker to Republican political strategist and former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove in which Walker described Johnson's role coordinating the activity.
"Bottom-line: R.J. helps keep in place a team that is wildly successful in Wisconsin. We are running 9 recall elections and it will be like 9 congressional markets in every market in the state (and Twin Cities)," Walker wrote to Rove on May 4, 2011.
The documents were unsealed as part of a lawsuit brought by the conservative group Wisconsin Club for Growth, which has been seeking to have the investigation shut down.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 19 June 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)
Haha
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 19 June 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)
― mattresslessness, Thursday, 19 June 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
yeah, it's real complicated. he did some horribly shady shit, but i am skeptical that he will have his day in court.
i hope the democratic candidate for governor, mary burke, can make some real hay of this, but she's almost a non-entity, or at least she strikes me as a second-rate candidate. nevertheless, most polls show her either tied with walker or only slightly behind. that isn't reflective of her candidacy as much as it is significant dislike for walker. she's going to really need to hammer him for nepotism, bad government, etc. (it shouldn't be hard) over the next few months. or we can just hope that walker stumbles off of his balcony.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 19 June 2014 22:48 (eleven years ago)
the funny thing is, Walker has moved into i'm-running-for-president mode. he no longer introduces or pushes much hard-right legislation like he did his first few years, he doesn't take public positions on anything anymore (not even gay marriage)... he's trying to avoid anything that might hem him in during the republican primaries. my guess is that, even if this scandal doesn't explode, he won't get much traction anyhow. he's really a bumbler, devoid of charisma. he doesn't have any back story that's remotely interesting (unless you count being reprimanded for cheating in his campaign to be elected student rep when he was in college--he never graduated btw. talk about foreshadowing).
― I dunno. (amateurist), Thursday, 19 June 2014 22:52 (eleven years ago)
Republican state senator Angela Hill got close to candor in a quote supplied to Breitbart:
“The Republican Party has never been the food stamp party, or the party of pork until desperation set in with Thad Cochran’s re-election bid,” Hill said. “I have never seen such open collaboration to get Democrats to spoil a Republican party primary or runoff as is being openly displayed by Thad Cochran operatives in the MS GOP establishment.”
Washington Monthly blog quoting Breitbart
― curmudgeon, Friday, 20 June 2014 15:08 (eleven years ago)
crazy shit down in MS
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/21/us/politics/cochran-asking-blacks-to-rescue-him-in-republican-primary.html
― goole, Friday, 20 June 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
i thought the nursing home break-in deal p much sank the other dude, but what do i know
― goole, Friday, 20 June 2014 15:41 (eleven years ago)
Ridiculoud how none of the quoted people feel comfortable openly referring to race. Everything is code words. What up American South I thought the racism thing was all out in the open.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 20 June 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
Er ridiculous
you were right the first time!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 20 June 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
The usual "last few minutes before the shootout in every western ever" stuff --
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/19/mcdaniel-event-shouting-match/10969615/
― WilliamC, Friday, 20 June 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
I like that 77 year-old guy who got in the shouting match with McDaniel
― curmudgeon, Friday, 20 June 2014 16:55 (eleven years ago)
I'm totally using ridiculoud as an adjective from here on out, that's great!
― wild-eyed, high-volume bursts of pious indignation (Dan Peterson), Friday, 20 June 2014 16:57 (eleven years ago)
joe walsh is ridiculoud
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/06/19/tea-party-ex-congressman-joe-walsh-says-he-was-booted-from-his-radio-show-for-racial-slurs/
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 20 June 2014 17:27 (eleven years ago)
cw itt seems to be "as nasty as things are now, the clinton years were #actually worse"
we may get to go back and look:
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2014/06/20/rape-victim-outraged-hillary-clinton-1975-case/
pretty ugly all around
― goole, Friday, 20 June 2014 22:19 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/in-southwest-va-health-needs-poverty-collide-with-antipathy-to-the-affordable-care-act/2014/06/19/4890bf8c-f4e7-11e3-9861-8dc65df15e56_story.html
LEBANON, Va. — Carolyn Underwood remembers her dad coming home covered in black coal dust from the mines. “Momma would have his water ready. He’d wash his face and she would wash his neck,” she said.
In old age, he suffered from black lung disease and wore an oxygen supply constantly. But unlike his daughter, he never worried about how he would pay his medical bills. The union took care of it.
That doesn’t make Carolyn Underwood, 63, a supporter of expanded government health coverage, even though she would benefit from it. In a region where the decline of the coal industry has sent poverty and health-care needs soaring, another force has grown at least by equal measures: antipathy to President Obama and the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
“I am scared of Obamacare,” Underwood said. “We’ve been hearing too many tales about it. We heard there’s doctors who get to decide . . . ” Before she could put her finger on the term “death panels,” her sister Nancy Taylor, 62, made a gun gesture with her hand and said, “Pow!”
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 21 June 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
obamacare is taking away our guns, too?
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 21 June 2014 16:54 (eleven years ago)
“I am scared of Obamacare,” Underwood said. “We’ve been hearing too many tales about it.
Well, you know the old saying: where there's smoke, there's a smoke machine.
― Aimless, Saturday, 21 June 2014 17:44 (eleven years ago)
Where's there's smoke, there's coal.
― pplains, Sunday, 22 June 2014 00:03 (eleven years ago)
condemned her for taking the limelight, tossed in a Nazi Germany comparison and disparaged the very notion of “peaceful” Muslims – all for Ahmed’s sin of pointing out that not all Muslims are evil
#
― leave the web boys alone (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 June 2014 00:07 (eleven years ago)
"I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing," Clinton wrote of the victim in the 1975 affidavit.
This was pretty much the line the Clinton White House used on Lewinsky pre-dress
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Sunday, 22 June 2014 15:10 (eleven years ago)
see waterface is right, she's a feminist she-ro
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 June 2014 15:16 (eleven years ago)
or... she was a lawyer?
― Every post you make is dripping with failure (stevie), Sunday, 22 June 2014 16:06 (eleven years ago)
seriously what is a lawyer supposed to do? get so irritated with people who're against the adversarial system when it's convenient for attacking somebody. her job was to blast holes in the other side's case. if you don't like that system, fine, but hating the player in cases like these is so moronic
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 22 June 2014 16:12 (eleven years ago)
hating the system in this case is a problem also, ppl like greenwald etc calling for gideon v wainwright to be overturned so they can spin a newscycle are idiots.
― balls, Sunday, 22 June 2014 16:19 (eleven years ago)
yeah. i mean, her client sounds like an evil fuckhole, but it's, i don't know, a GOOD thing that every accused gets to have a lawyer fighting for their side? xp
― Every post you make is dripping with failure (stevie), Sunday, 22 June 2014 16:20 (eleven years ago)
take that, kenya!
http://www.argusleader.com/story/davidmontgomery/2014/06/21/sdgop-obama-impeachment/11212075/
(the comment section is adorable)
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 22 June 2014 21:46 (eleven years ago)
The resolution says Obama has "violated his oath of office in numerous ways." It specifically cites the release of five Taliban combatants in a trade for captive U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl, Obama's statement that people could keep insurance companies, and recent EPA regulations on power plants."Therefore, be it resolved that the South Dakota Republican Party calls on our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States," the resolution reads.Allen Unruh of Sioux Falls sponsored the resolution."I've got a thick book on impeachable offenses of the president," Unruh said, calling on South Dakota to "send a symbolic message that liberty shall be the law of the land."
"Therefore, be it resolved that the South Dakota Republican Party calls on our U.S. Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of the United States," the resolution reads.
Allen Unruh of Sioux Falls sponsored the resolution.
"I've got a thick book on impeachable offenses of the president," Unruh said, calling on South Dakota to "send a symbolic message that liberty shall be the law of the land."
ROCK SOLID CASE. i always like to put a face with a name, so here is Allen Unruh, the smartest man in North America:
http://i.imgur.com/mKcBRI6.jpg
― Karl Malone, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:09 (eleven years ago)
is he aware that those are things Obama did, not criminal acts according to the criminal code of the United States of America
― Οὖτις, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)
I would not be surprised if the EPA enacting a regulation on a power plant is actually a criminal act in South Dakota
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:18 (eleven years ago)
wow EPA regulations on power plants somebody stop this mad man
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:18 (eleven years ago)
fuck yeah he's aware, but here's where what i like to call "the Unruh Factor" - the special sauce that only Unruh can bring to bear - comes in. it's not just that Obama was involved...it's that Obama was involved and Unruh disagreed with what happened. IMPEACHMENT
― Karl Malone, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:18 (eleven years ago)
Don't argue with that dude, he's an angel and knows all
http://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-VoIfasYK_Jk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAKkU/26MaXJza_s0/s512-c/photo.jpg
― Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
have we discussed this yet?http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/06/obama-doj-declassified-full-memo-targeted-killing-drone-strike-anwar-al-awlaki
― Mordy, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:22 (eleven years ago)
And thus, just as the AUMF authorizes the military detention of a U.S. citizen captured abroad who is part of an armed force within the scope of the AUMF, it also authorizes the use of "necessary and appropriate" lethal force against a U.S. citizen who has joined such an armed force. Moreover, as we explain further in Part VI, DoD would conduct the operation in a manner that would not violate any possible constitutional protections that al-Aulaqi enjoys by reason of his citizenship. Accordingly, we do not believe al-Aulqi's citizenship provides a basis for concluding that he is immune from a use of force abroad that the AUMF otherwise authorizes.
― Mordy, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
just to be clear i would be fine with lawyerdom being a disqualification for the presidency, if it mattered
or for writing Justice Dept memos too
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
let's make it so that all law is interpreted by citizens w/out experience or training in legal questions thereby turning the entire world into the internet
― Mordy, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:29 (eleven years ago)
experience and training certainly has kept the Occupation going
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 June 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― Mordy, Monday, 23 June 2014 19:39 (eleven years ago)
Important sections of the Justice Department’s legal analysis were stripped from the version of the document released to the public. Among the deleted portions were paragraphs that presumably explained why the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel determined that killing Awlaki in a drone strike would not violate the Fourth Amendment, which guarantees due process to U.S. citizens accused of crimes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/legal-memo-backing-drone-strike-is-released/2014/06/23/1f48dd16-faec-11e3-8176-f2c941cf35f1_story.html
― curmudgeon, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
my favorite "political" exchange of the week.
Pitchfork @pitchforkmedia Jun 22 -- "The contemporary social order makes it very difficult for us to love." — @HowToDressWell ________________________________Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @pitchforkmedia @HowToDressWell Maybe it's because you only care about yourselves. #ObamaCult________________________________how to dress well @HowToDressWell Jun 22 -- @RepStevenSmith, you are an actual monster________________________________Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @HowToDressWell Don't you have a mirror to be talking to, boy? The monsters are today's hipster youth. #SelfishBrats________________________________@HowToDressWell -- @RepStevenSmith, u do know that i'm a guy who makes music right and you're tweeting at me? just want to make sure we're on the same page.________________________________Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @HowToDressWell The soundtrack to this nation's destruction. #SirenSong
Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @pitchforkmedia @HowToDressWell Maybe it's because you only care about yourselves. #ObamaCult
how to dress well @HowToDressWell Jun 22 -- @RepStevenSmith, you are an actual monster
Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @HowToDressWell Don't you have a mirror to be talking to, boy? The monsters are today's hipster youth. #SelfishBrats
@HowToDressWell -- @RepStevenSmith, u do know that i'm a guy who makes music right and you're tweeting at me? just want to make sure we're on the same page.
Rep. Steve Smith @RepStevenSmith Jun 22 -- @HowToDressWell The soundtrack to this nation's destruction. #SirenSong
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:41 (eleven years ago)
beauty
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:42 (eleven years ago)
Wtf
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Monday, 23 June 2014 21:44 (eleven years ago)
http://m.ajc.com/weblogs/political-insider/2013/nov/19/rep-steven-smith-fake-ga/
aw man, i knew it was too good to be true.
Some mischief-maker has started a Twitter account for a fake tea party congressman from Valdosta and briefly duped a couple of left-leaning journalists this afternoon.The profile for @RepStevenSmith reads: "Republican Representative of Georgia's 15th Congressional District : Tea Party Patriot : American : Constitutionalist : Valdosta, Georgia, USA · smith.house.gov"But Georgia only has 14 congressional districts, and Smith's tweets were rather un-congressional. Well, not Anthony Weiner un-congressional, but the account was clearly meant to parody conservative congressmen.
The profile for @RepStevenSmith reads: "Republican Representative of Georgia's 15th Congressional District : Tea Party Patriot : American : Constitutionalist : Valdosta, Georgia, USA · smith.house.gov"
But Georgia only has 14 congressional districts, and Smith's tweets were rather un-congressional. Well, not Anthony Weiner un-congressional, but the account was clearly meant to parody conservative congressmen.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
there is no way anyone in the House GOP knows what Pitchfork is
― Οὖτις, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:48 (eleven years ago)
apparently not an "actual" monster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
― mattresslessness, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:48 (eleven years ago)
the account uses a photo that Mediaite reported is "a stock photo for a big and tall apparel shop based in New Hampshire.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)
dammit.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)
I have it on good authority that Rand Paul is a big tUnE-yArDs fan. He thinks it's an angram for "D AYNS TRUE."
― Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Monday, 23 June 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)
Apparently the twitter acct is fake?
― Stephen King's Threaderstarter (kingfish), Monday, 23 June 2014 21:52 (eleven years ago)
― Karl Malone, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:55 (eleven years ago)
― macklin' rosie (crüt), Monday, 23 June 2014 21:56 (eleven years ago)
I have it on good authority that Rand Paul is a big tUnE-yArDs fan. He thinks it's an angra for "D AYNS TRUE."
― mattresslessness, Monday, 23 June 2014 21:57 (eleven years ago)
i think it's good that steven smith is engaging with the youth media but what does skip bayless make of this?
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 23 June 2014 22:19 (eleven years ago)
heard this was fake.
― mattresslessness, Monday, 23 June 2014 22:23 (eleven years ago)
star wars
I heard How to Dress Well is fake.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 June 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)
― macklin' rosie (crüt), Monday, 23 June 2014 22:29 (eleven years ago)
Moreover, as we explain further in Part VI, DoD would conduct the operation in a manner that would not violate any possible constitutional protections that al-Aulaqi enjoys by reason of his citizenship.
oh well that's a relief
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 23 June 2014 22:30 (eleven years ago)
he wasn't enjoying those constitutional protections anyway amirite
― Οὖτις, Monday, 23 June 2014 22:31 (eleven years ago)
Life liberty and the pursuit of hapiness
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 23 June 2014 23:04 (eleven years ago)
Use 'em or lose 'em.
― Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Monday, 23 June 2014 23:08 (eleven years ago)
Pretty sure he gets a complimentary glass of wine iirc
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 23 June 2014 23:38 (eleven years ago)
I thought just something from Chipotle:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/06/obama-chipotle-sneeze-guard.html
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 15:38 (eleven years ago)
god this shit in Mississippi. Everybody involved is disgusting - Cochran for desperate pandering, McDaniel for being racist psycho, assholes for policing polls, it's like it's still 1954 there or something
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-man-who-broke-the-middle-east-108140.html?ml=m_pm#.U6mcOPldVGg
really enjoying all these op-eds by bush cronies on how the disintegration of political stability in the middle east is all obama's fault. this one pretty squarely places the blame for 160,000 civilian deaths in syria on the president's back, while ignoring of course all the viable reasons for obama's non-intervention (difficulty of targeting the correct rebel groups to arm, desire not to escalate american obligations in the conflict beyond immediate term, complete lack of political will on behalf of the american people for further armed conflict, etc.)
― building a desert (art), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 15:49 (eleven years ago)
it's like it's still 1954 there or something
have you been to mississippi? it's pretty much still 1954 there.
― building a desert (art), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 15:50 (eleven years ago)
seriously that abrams thing had my world all red
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:10 (eleven years ago)
one of my favorite kinds of journalism is just totally blowing up a dude's spot
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/mike-turner-millennial-congress-family-trust-fund
― goole, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
it's kind of baffling that anybody gives these assholes column space
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:13 (eleven years ago)
that guy doesn't make the bro team tbqh
― macklin' rosie (crüt), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
lol @ Romney at the end.
― pplains, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:20 (eleven years ago)
I think I know which guy plays Jenga in his spare time and which guy killed Osama Bin Laden.
― pplains, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:21 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/481260027450097665
― goole, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:34 (eleven years ago)
I feel like chipotle employees have come close to slapping my damn hands off the sneeze guard on multiple occasions
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:50 (eleven years ago)
Was just refreshing my memory of Elliot Abrams:
Abrams was forced to plead guilty to unlawfully withholding material information from Congress and to apologize to the Senate Intelligence Committee. He was also disbarred in the District of Columbia.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 17:12 (eleven years ago)
fortunately the Bush administration hired him for more fun
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 17:14 (eleven years ago)
and Poppy pardoned him
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 17:15 (eleven years ago)
https://vine.co/v/Mt1MWHqbDZH
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 19:49 (eleven years ago)
hands across america 2.0
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)
Listen To Tea Party Candidate Chris McDaniel Go On An Extended Riff About Lesbians
“There’s going to be a lesbian Brokeback Mountain and it’s going to star Beyonce and Eva Longoria.”
posted on June 24, 2014, at 3:46 p.m.Andrew Kaczynski BuzzFeed Staff
― goole, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 20:52 (eleven years ago)
is he complaining or anticipating
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 20:56 (eleven years ago)
omg that Vine
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Tuesday, 24 June 2014 21:10 (eleven years ago)
x-post- further from his days as a radio host
"You got it, that's it. Where's Janet Reno here when you need her? This is a perfect film for Rosie (O'Donnell) and Janet right? But nobody wants to go see that.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)
But how about this guy running in Georgia:
Jody Hice, a Baptist minister and talk-radio host, is running for Congress in Georgia’s 10th Congressional District as a stern defender of the First Amendment and religious freedom. But that freedom does not apply to those of the Muslim faith.
“Although Islam has a religious component, it is much more than a simple religious ideology,” Hice wrote in his 2012 book. “It is a complete geo-political structure and, as such, does not deserve First Amendment protection.”
Hice believes that the Muslim Brotherhood is infiltrating the United States, with the intent to impose Sharia law on all of us. He also believes that it’s fine for women to seek political office, at least if certain conditions are met. “If the woman’s within the authority of her husband, I don’t see a problem,” he told the Athens Banner-Herald in 2004.
http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/jay-bookman/2014/jun/23/first-amendment-only-christians/
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 22:28 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, Jody Hice is a fucking treat.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 22:43 (eleven years ago)
“If the woman’s within the authority of her husband, I don’t see a problem,”
what if she's within the authority of her wife
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 June 2014 22:54 (eleven years ago)
One county left to report and it looks like Cochran may have pulled this upset out with the help of the black community and line-crossing Democrats. Cochran's up by about 4500. The Tea Party is about to shit the biggest collective squealy-worm since the 13th-15th Amendments passed.
― How Suarez's biting affects housing prices, in 3 charts (WilliamC), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:22 (eleven years ago)
It would be an even bigger surprise too, because I just heard that democrats who voted in the original primary couldn't vote in the runoff (democrats who didn't can do so).
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:34 (eleven years ago)
I voted in the Dem primary, but I think a lot of Dems just stayed home that day, so they were available to report for ratfucking duty today.
― How Suarez's biting affects housing prices, in 3 charts (WilliamC), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:37 (eleven years ago)
Cochran's lead is closing a bit; down to 3997 votes with 86 of 1832 precincts still to report.
― How Suarez's biting affects housing prices, in 3 charts (WilliamC), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:40 (eleven years ago)
Lol ratfucking duty
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:41 (eleven years ago)
"Hi, Chris."
http://www.criticalcommons.org/Members/ccManager/clips/donald-segretti-scene-from-all-the-presidents-men/thumbnailImage
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:44 (eleven years ago)
The Cock wins!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 03:08 (eleven years ago)
CNN calls it for Thad exclamation point
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 03:09 (eleven years ago)
lol, Blitzer just referred to "Governor Thad Cochran." I had almost forgotten how horrible he is.
― How Suarez's biting affects housing prices, in 3 charts (WilliamC), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 03:43 (eleven years ago)
what will it take to get rid of that corrupt fuck Charlie Rangel
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 04:50 (eleven years ago)
What the? I thought he was finally toast.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 04:54 (eleven years ago)
shawnmer • 35 minutes agoIn doing this, the GOP has done a few things:
1.) They have actually REINFORCED the notion that conservatism is not a viable option for blacks, but an overt threat.2.) They have given the Left an opportunity to "nyeah nyeah" to both the establishment, and the TP. They can say, accurately that their loyal foot soldiers, blacks, bailed out the party brass, and they can say, inaccurately that this is an example of the TP being "dead." Because so many "dead" political movements require recruting the opposition to participate in primaries. 3.) They have put on record numerous prominent Republicans calling their own ideology "extreme" and that cuts in federal spending would hurt ordinary people.4.) They have essentially given the left verification for their old saw that Southern Republicans are first order hypocrites, by mouthing insincere fealty to fiscal responsibility, while being unwilling to actually give up any federal spending that benefits them. Who can argue that point with them after this??5.) They have perhaps irreparably alienated their most loyal supporters in a jaw-dropping display of corrupting the voting process.
I want to hear you explain to the average conservative Tea Partier, Haley Barbour, who were the vast majority of votes you received to become Governor, how you just absolutely HAD to drag this sorry, geriatric, barely sentient carcass across the finish line with these sleazy tactics. This was going to be a Republican seat under ANY imaginable scenario, so this was not about saving the seat for the party. You had to have THIS PARTICULAR Republican.
Come on, let's hear it!
― How Suarez's biting affects housing prices, in 3 charts (WilliamC), Wednesday, 25 June 2014 12:40 (eleven years ago)
pt 4 is pretty otm actually
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:52 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/boehner-will-sue-obama
On behalf of the House, and separate from impeachment....Will they really go ahead with this?
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 23:16 (eleven years ago)
probably. but I doubt it will get anywhere.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 25 June 2014 23:18 (eleven years ago)
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/06/25/overheard_in_warsaw_poland_radek_sikorski_donald_tusk_leaks
In a chatty dinner marked by a lot of salty language and a few off-color jokes, Sikorski, a noted anti-Russia hawk and strong advocate of NATO, also weighed in on what he thought of Poland's "worthless" alliance with the United States. "Complete bullshit. We'll get into a conflict with the Germans and the Russians and we'll think that everything is super because we gave the Americans a blowjob," Poland's top diplomat said.
― Mordy, Thursday, 26 June 2014 04:38 (eleven years ago)
if the poor have it so easy, why did you decide to be rich?
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 26 June 2014 18:26 (eleven years ago)
"On behalf of the House, and separate from impeachment....Will they really go ahead with this?"
why stop? they're reaganning!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/06/25/speaker-boehners-obama-impeachment-dress-rehearsal/
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 26 June 2014 18:42 (eleven years ago)
Can I sue the house for doing jack fucking shit the last 4 years
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 26 June 2014 21:41 (eleven years ago)
that's the job they were sent to do
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 26 June 2014 21:44 (eleven years ago)
NBC already did its best to run an oh-how-times-have-changed obit: Howard Baker dead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/us/politics/howard-h-baker-jr-great-conciliator-of-senate-dies-at-88.html?_r=0
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 26 June 2014 22:44 (eleven years ago)
Sources: Miss. tea party leader Mayfield dead of apparent suicide
― cheese is never wrong (doo dah), Friday, 27 June 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
gop killed mayfield
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 27 June 2014 16:00 (eleven years ago)
Obama did it
― Οὖτις, Friday, 27 June 2014 16:01 (eleven years ago)
man that's some rough shit. sad.
― goole, Friday, 27 June 2014 16:25 (eleven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/frank-lucas-body-double-accusation
where do they get these motherfuckers
― goole, Friday, 27 June 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
http://www.timothyraymurray.com/Home_Page.html
you had me at "News Person" dude
― goole, Friday, 27 June 2014 18:45 (eleven years ago)
I will NEVER use Artificial Intelligence look alike to voice whatThe Representative’s Office is doing nor own a robot look alike.
The Representative’s Office is doing nor own a robot look alike.
― lauded at conferences of deluded psychopaths (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 27 June 2014 18:54 (eleven years ago)
whole thing needs to be commemorated here:
News Person,
The election for U.S. House for Oklahoma’s 3rd District will be contested by the Candidate, Timothy Ray Murray. I will be stating that his votes are switched with Rep. Lucas votes, because it is widely known Rep. Frank D. Lucas is no longer alive and has been displayed by a look alike. Rep. Lucas’ look alike was depicted as sentenced on a white stage in southern Ukraine on or aboutJan. 11, 2011.
This is a situation similar to the Senators’ from Kentucky situation in the 2012 election. I am contesting that this matter has happen since his election was blocked, because of the U.S. Defense Department’s use of Mr. Murray’s DNA. To my knowledge, the U.S. Defense Department has not released to the public that information, as it is their confidential information about many people. Congress is likely wanting me to state that all my DNA used will not result in benefits to people I have never had relations with of a family nature. I have been bound to protect that information unless it causes harm to The People.
The contest of election and or petition will be correctly filed with county election boards and with federal offices. I, Hon. Mr. Timothy Ray Murray, fully meet all Constitutional, Federal and Oklahoma requirements for election and for holding Office if the voters’ results show that is the case.
Thank You for your service in giving Oklahomans great current news and information.
Sincerely,
(Digital signature was recorded)
Hon. Timothy Ray Murray
Tim Murray for Congress
Toll Free: 1-(800) 865-6072
Email: commit✧✧✧@timothyraymur✧✧✧.c✧✧
Web: www.timothyraymurray.com
______________________________________________________
I, Timothy Ray Murray, am a human, born in Oklahoma, and obtained and continue to fully meet the requirements to serve as U.S. Representative when honored to so. I will never use a look alike to replace my (The Office’s) message to you or to anyone else, as both the other Republican Challengers have.
Rep. Frank Lucas, and a few other Oklahoma and other States’ Congressional Members were depicted as being executed by The World Court on or about Jan. 11, 2011 in Southern Ukraine. On television they were depicted as being executed by the hanging about the neck until death on a white stage and in front of witnesses. Other now current Members of Congress have shared those facts on television also. We know that it is possible to use look alike artificial or manmade replacements, however Rep. Lucas was not eligible to serve as a Congressional Member after that time.
The World knows the truth and We must always display and communicate the truth. I will always share public information with the truth when honored to serve as your Representative.
June 24, I need your vote. The vote cannot be overlooked by the Judicial Branch, however the vote must be there and in order to be heard as the will of The People and not cast-off.
― goole, Friday, 27 June 2014 19:01 (eleven years ago)
Congress is likely wanting me to state that all my DNA used will not result in benefits to people I have never had relations with of a family nature. I have been bound to protect that information unless it causes harm to The People.
you and me both dog
― goole, Friday, 27 June 2014 19:02 (eleven years ago)
remember people, republicans are the real christians
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dick-cheney-says-obama-cuts-defense-spend-food-stamps-n142361
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 27 June 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 27 June 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)
am a human
http://paulsawchuk.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/treehouse10.jpg
― Disagree. And im not into firey solos chief. (Phil D.), Friday, 27 June 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
most accurate email address ever
― Euler, Friday, 27 June 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
The contest of election and or petition will be correctly filed with county election boards and with federal offices
somehow I doubt this
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Friday, 27 June 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
I, Timothy Ray Murray, am a human, born in Oklahoma, and obtained and continue to fully meet the requirements to serve as U.S. Representative when honored to so.
While we were apart, I was human too.
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Sunday, 29 June 2014 00:57 (eleven years ago)
same ol', same ol' could be coming soon:
House Republicans signaled in June that they'd seek to use the appropriations bill to reverse the EPA rule. As TPM reported recently, there is strong enthusiasm among Senate Republicans for doing the same thing. Senate Democratic leaders have sought to preserve the regulations during the messy appropriations debate against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) efforts to derail them. If both sides stick to their guns, it could set the stage for another partial shutdown of the federal government on Oct. 1.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/house-gop-appropriations-bill-blocks-epa-rule
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 July 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
so this bill to override the birth control ruling, how could that possibly work
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 July 2014 20:18 (eleven years ago)
The First Amendment also protects religious liberties, but the Supreme Court decision was based on the justices’ reading of an act of Congress, not the Constitution, so lawmakers said that Congress could change the law.
I mean do they really expect this to matter to Scalia et al
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 8 July 2014 20:20 (eleven years ago)
SCOTUS ruling was based on constitutional interpretation, so it can't be overruled by Congress. But Congress could pass a law that pays for contraception when the corporate overlords decide paying for it wounds their religious sensibilities. Alito even suggests this route in the opinion.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 8 July 2014 20:22 (eleven years ago)
Congress could also change the Restoration of Religious Freedom Act, but the "undue burden" standard just passed constitutional muster in the ruling, so there's really no difference I can see if Congress were to change that law. Also, Congress is incapable of passing anything controversial atm.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 8 July 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-the-real-medicaid-problem/2014/07/13/6a9b82c4-0919-11e4-8a6a-19355c7e870a_story.html?hpid=z2
Ugh, Samuelson's standard simplistic explanation of where and how money is raised and spent; and his standard pitting spending for the poor via Medicaid versus "traditional" functions
The White House recently put out a 40-page report arguing that the 24 states that have not expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA or “Obamacare”) are hurting their poor and themselves. It’s an easy case to make, but it’s incomplete and misleading. The further truth is that Medicaid also threatens to crowd out spending for many traditional state and local functions: schools, police, roads, libraries and more.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 14 July 2014 16:45 (eleven years ago)
oh so local governments are spending all their money on schools roads and libraries now huh
― j., Monday, 14 July 2014 16:49 (eleven years ago)
And the Washington Post's neo-con editorial page editor Fred Hyatt does an equally questionable variation on this argument--If liberals won't agree to Social Security cuts, there will not be any money left for liberal spending causes x, y, and z
― curmudgeon, Monday, 14 July 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
Well, the conservative reps in Congress and state legislatures have effectively put ever-lower ceilings on revenues, by incrementally lowering taxes and then refusing ever to raise them again for any reason. So, there is a certain factual truth to the idea that basic government services are increasingly forced to compete with one another for scarce dollars and in the end all of them are losers, just in different degrees.
There are a lot of voters out there who think that our military budget is sacrosanct, whereas Social Security and Medicare are socialist abominations, and the conservatives in the media do all they can to encourage this pov.
The current political realities back up their argument. Of course, this assumes that the primary argument, about larger social values and priorities, is over. But it never is.
― frog latin (Aimless), Monday, 14 July 2014 18:13 (eleven years ago)
god fucking damn it. jody hice is my new congressman.
perdue looks like he is going to beat kingston. you might see some ppl paint this as a tea party victory (might not, no idea what the national spin is) but don't buy it, perdue's campaign was standard anti-washington 'let's send a businessman' emptiness plus his cousin is a popular former governor and share's the last name. kingston was a safe, "sensible", grownup republican when he entered but by tonight had morphed into as crazy a rightwinger as any of them. nunn's got a real shot to beat perdue (or kingston if he pulls it out), jason 'yes that' carter has a shot in the governor's race, both will have positions that it will shock and disgust ppl outside of the south to see a democrat hold, both are what i would've thought of as too liberal to win in ga prior to this (maybe still are, maybe any democrat is), both helped by circumstances.
― balls, Wednesday, 23 July 2014 03:57 (eleven years ago)
jason 'yes that' carter
had to google this guy as I was sure you meant "related to Jay-Z"
― relentlessly pecking at peace (President Keyes), Wednesday, 23 July 2014 13:04 (eleven years ago)
Haha.
Yes, I'm definitely not wild about Michelle Nunn or Jason Carter, but these races should be good to watch with popcorn because one or both of them could come out on top.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 23 July 2014 13:10 (eleven years ago)
apparently a couple of my friends are working for Michelle Nunn; this just popped up in my Facebook news feed:
https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/gaonmymind
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Wednesday, 23 July 2014 16:57 (eleven years ago)
these races should be good to watch with popcorn a cyanide tablet because one or both of them could come out on top.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 July 2014 17:10 (eleven years ago)
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's take:
After Republicans nominated a misogynistic multi-millionaire in this week’s primary, MSNBC’s Morning Joe reports that Georgia is “easily, HANDS-DOWN the best chance Democrats have to pick up a Republican seat.”
If we win in Georgia and across the South, we won’t just win the Senate – we’ll transform the entire political landscape by turning red states blue and CRUSH the Republican Party.
IFFFFFFF. Many others are still predicting the Republicans will take the Senate because so many of the states at issue are reddish ones where Romney won
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/congressedits/status/492027099499462657
― goole, Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/Grand_Moff_Tarkin.png
"We will crush the Republicans in one swift stroke."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
tbh, that's the kind of attitude you need to work at the DSCC, otherwise you'd kill yourself.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)
professional fantasist turnover is high, i imagine
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:35 (eleven years ago)
Howie Klein of outsider Democrat fundraising group Blue America is always offering his take on how the DSCC does its job:
http://crooksandliars.com/2014/03/tell-dscc-your-job-elect-democrats-not
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 24 July 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
perilously close to mark russell territory but i did chuckle
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/26/upshot/finally-a-cocktail-congress-can-agree-on.html?_r=0
― goole, Friday, 25 July 2014 22:01 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-gop-moves-closer-on-immigration-bill-ahead-of-recess/2014/08/01/11084a2e-1983-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265_story.html?hpid=z1
After creation of link headline, the House finally passed something in the wee hours, but its nowhere near the Senate bill or the White House proposal
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 2 August 2014 15:55 (eleven years ago)
Without question, John Brennan should be fired. That he isn’t being fired shows that the president is simply afraid to fire him. Friedersdorf explains this fear as trepidation that Brennan will spill damaging secrets that make Obama look like some kind of war criminal himself. I think the fear is more related to the kind of murderous rage than might ensue if the CIA is held to account for their performance in the aftermath of 9/11. Whether this fear is well-founded or not, it is not irrational. Just look at what the CIA has already done to try to cover its tracks.
I think its sadly more like Obama knows that neither the majority of Congressional Dems or Republicans care enough to take on the CIA and want Brennan fired.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_08/its_not_easy_to_hold_the_cia_a051481.php
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 2 August 2014 17:01 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-director-under-fire-from-lawmakers-after-agencys-search-of-senate-computers/2014/08/01/3f091478-19a9-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265_story.html?hpid=z4
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the committee, said in an interview Friday that he was troubled that the agency’s inspector general report blamed only five CIA employees without making clear who had ordered or approved the secret search. “It’s not clear to me how exactly the director became aware of this specific intrusion,” Heinrich said. “But it’s fairly clear to me . . . that the director played a role in setting the tone that would have led people to think this was somehow appropriate
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 2 August 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
Obama is counting on noone caring about this, and succeeding.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 4 August 2014 13:39 (eleven years ago)
Its also highly possible everyone in congress is complicit along with the executive branch so nothing is pretty much guaranteed to happen.'
also my mind is blown congress just STARTED its 5 week long summer recess. I thought they've on summer break since like late may.
(late may 2010 amirite)
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 4 August 2014 16:43 (eleven years ago)
Yep, but: Now now, the House just passed their let's deport all Spanish-speaking border crossers bill and just because it is nothing like the Senate bill or the President's proposal, and they won't negotiate a compromise regarding it, it is not their fault...
― curmudgeon, Monday, 4 August 2014 17:59 (eleven years ago)
if you'd said the day after the election that the republicans would pass a deport 'em all bill nobody would've believed you. i'm curious what kind of suicide pact ted cruz will get the gop to sign on to next year.
― balls, Monday, 4 August 2014 18:35 (eleven years ago)
Those reps are all in safe districts. They ain't going anywhere for a while.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 4 August 2014 18:43 (eleven years ago)
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/republican-gop-senate-forecast/
And Nate Silver thinks Republicans have a good chance of gaining control of the Senate
― curmudgeon, Monday, 4 August 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
We knew that though!
I didn't know he changed his hair again.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 4 August 2014 21:20 (eleven years ago)
Silver's just giving more detail on locations where things have gotten even worse for Dems:
There are shifts working to the GOP’s benefit in five states.4 The largest change is in Montana, where we’d previously given the Democratic Sen. John Walsh, who was appointed to replace the retiring Sen. Max Baucus earlier this year, just a 15 percent chance of retaining his seat. Now we have his chances even lower, at 5 percent. The main reason is the revelation that Walsh plagiarized passages of his master’s thesis at the United States Army War College. Walsh was already well behind his Republican opponent, Rep. Steve Daines, in the polls and was going to need almost everything to break right to come back in the race. This was like an NFL team throwing a pick-six when it was already down 17-3. Two other changes are the result of Republican primaries
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 5 August 2014 15:01 (eleven years ago)
man at least our grotesque war octopus used be good at war
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/fd-how-the-u-s-and-its-allies-got-stuck-with-the-worlds-worst-new-warplane-5c95d45f86a5
― ♪♫ teenage wasteman ♪♫ (goole), Wednesday, 6 August 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
http://mentalfloss.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_640x430/public/homer_15.jpg
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Wednesday, 6 August 2014 17:33 (eleven years ago)
apparently obama did some strategic military action on iraq today. watching the lunkheads on MSNBC right now i'm noticing none of their profundity ever touches on the fact that we created that situation in Iraq. which i think uhhh ... might be a little relevant to the situation. has this become our new national shame? welcome aboard war in iraq, you'll be joining vietnam, hiroshima and nagasaki, slavery, and genociding the Native Americans. good group of guys.
― Spectrum, Friday, 8 August 2014 01:56 (eleven years ago)
alright, maybe that was a little much, i'd just like to hear about it more.
― Spectrum, Friday, 8 August 2014 02:06 (eleven years ago)
Nelson's out! Wow kiss that seat goodbye
― Οὖτις, Friday, 8 August 2014 02:09 (eleven years ago)
do you mean Walsh?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 August 2014 02:15 (eleven years ago)
"conservative" "think" tanks are starting to catch on
http://www.epi.org/blog/epi-and-aei-agree-cutting-jobless-benefits-did-not-boost-employment/
here's hoping decent standards of living will trickle down any day now from "the successful"!
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 14 August 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/16/us/gov-rick-perry-of-texas-is-indicted-over-veto-of-funds-for-das-office.html
― Mordy, Saturday, 16 August 2014 00:07 (eleven years ago)
weird situation. fuck everyone involved tho
― k3vin k., Sunday, 17 August 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
god help me but the indictment looks ridiculous.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 17 August 2014 16:37 (eleven years ago)
@pareene · Aug 15As someone else pointed out to me, it appears that Rick Perry has been indicted for being Andrew Cuomo
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 August 2014 03:28 (eleven years ago)
Watching Up from this wkend and Greg Orman's voice is even more annoying than his vacillating over policy, which is fucking saying something.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Tuesday, 26 August 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
NY Times:
The Opinion Pages
The Editorial Board’s Decision on the Governor’s Primary in New York
The Times will not make an endorsement in the Democratic primary for governor because Andrew Cuomo failed to keep his most important campaign promise and Zephyr Teachout lacks political experience.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:00 (eleven years ago)
but it would be a bold new adventure to vote for someone named "Zephyr Teachout."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
zephyr rain teachout...born 1972
― iatee, Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:12 (eleven years ago)
since i can't drop Cuomo in a vat of goat waste, i will vote for her, then Hawkins of the Greens in Nov.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:14 (eleven years ago)
still can't believe WFP turned coat like that
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
Cuomo's lipservice was enough to win them over
So Teachout is a Fordham Law prof
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 27 August 2014 19:10 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_08/ryans_new_reading_list_not_com051835.php
Paul Ryan has moved on from Ayn Rand. His new faves are not an improvement apparently
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 27 August 2014 19:12 (eleven years ago)
And another predictable politician caught on leaked tape at a Koch Brothers event promising to use reconciliation to go after epa, health care, financial regulation and noting:
Mr. McConnell also gave some ammunition to his Democratic opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes, when he promised that “we’re not going to be debating all these gosh darn proposals.”
“That’s all we do in the Senate is vote on things like raising the minimum wage,” he added. Mr. McConnell called the 2002 passage of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law “the worst day of my political life.”
The Grimes campaign responded almost immediately, saying, “Shockingly, Mitch McConnell will do and say anything it takes to secure his grip on personal power, including promising to hurt Kentuckians to benefit billionaires.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/28/us/politics/on-tape-mcconnell-envisions-using-budget-to-undo-obama-initiatives.html?_r=0
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 27 August 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:31 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I think WFP had reasons.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 27 August 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
worthle$$ promi$e$
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 August 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
they are a joke of a party, always have been
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 27 August 2014 21:48 (eleven years ago)
seems to me they have some fine reasons to do what they did do--i just wonder if it will pay off, and whether teachout might have been a meaningful wrench in the gears.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 27 August 2014 22:10 (eleven years ago)
Hmmm, would an Obama executive action re immigration pre-November really send more voters for Republican candidates to the polls in the mostly red or purple states with senatorial elections? Not sure
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-immigration-decision-could-roil-2014-election/2014/08/27/94f43da8-2dfa-11e4-9b98-848790384093_story.html?hpid=z1
Both political parties are in a state of high anxiety about the possibility that President Obama will allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in the country, fearing that White House action on the issue could change the course of November’s midterm elections. In the past few days, Democratic candidates in nearly every closely fought Senate race have criticized the idea of aggressive action by Obama. Some strategists say privately that it would signal that he has written off the Democrats’ prospects for retaining control of the chamber, deciding to focus on securing his legacy instead. Senior Republicans, meanwhile, have their own worries about a “September surprise” on immigration. They know their volatile party’s tendency to erupt at such moments — including government shutdowns and impeachment threats — and that the GOP brand is even more tattered than the Democratic one.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 28 August 2014 14:10 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/29/morning-plum-why-top-dems-are-worried-about-politics-of-deportations/?hpid=z3
Maybe waiting till election day night in November is the answer
― curmudgeon, Friday, 29 August 2014 15:49 (eleven years ago)
Judging from this thread, American Politics 2014 suffers from such advanced political rigor mortis that we are left with nothing to talk about. Even mocking these politicians and issues for the hundredth time has become extremely tedious.
― Aimless, Friday, 29 August 2014 16:00 (eleven years ago)
YOU'RE ALMOST THERE!
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 August 2014 16:02 (eleven years ago)
I don't consider political catatonia to be a desirable destination.
― Aimless, Friday, 29 August 2014 16:05 (eleven years ago)
It's kinda where we've been since the '10 midterms
― goole, Friday, 29 August 2014 16:05 (eleven years ago)
there's basically nothing happening now, everything is playing out in the most predictable manner imaginable, with no legislative victories for either side. foreign policy obviously where all the action is at the moment, which is why there is more activity on the MENA thread than here (idk how much we care about the Russia/Ukraine thing, which is its own special kind of clusterfuck). But basically we're in a holding pattern until the 2016 election. Whether or not the GOP takes the Senate is sorta irrelevant, since even if they do there is still gonna be nothing but gridlock and empty posturing for the next two years.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 29 August 2014 16:08 (eleven years ago)
The truth is a desirable destination.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 August 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
I am glad about Obama's recent moves in the climate change dept (esp the order re: regulation of GHG emissions from power plants) but that stuff is mostly on the margins
― Οὖτις, Friday, 29 August 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
yep. Hey Morbs:
Zephyr Teachout just picked up key endorsements from the Sierra Club and the National Organization for Women!
from "bold progressives " fundraising group email who want to pull off a miracle with a few more bucks
― curmudgeon, Friday, 29 August 2014 22:02 (eleven years ago)
http://www.texastribune.org/2014/08/29/federal-judge-strikes-down-texas-abortion-regulati/
― Everyone's a closet ned. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 29 August 2014 22:14 (eleven years ago)
yay
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 30 August 2014 15:04 (eleven years ago)
good news, hope it sticks
― odd proggy geezer (Moodles), Saturday, 30 August 2014 15:47 (eleven years ago)
Thanks a lot Mr. Amazon:
Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos is replacing Publisher Katharine Weymouth with Frederick J. Ryan Jr., a former Reagan administration official who was part of the founding leadership team of Politico, a primarily digital news organization that competes with The Post on political coverage, the company announced Tuesday.
The departure of Weymouth, 48, ends eight decades of Graham family leadership of The Post, which her great-grandfather bought in 1933. Bezos, who acquired The Post for $250 million in a sale announced in August 2013, initially kept the senior leadership team intact. He told Weymouth during a visit to Washington, on Aug. 18, that he had selected a new publisher, according to people familiar with the decision. She will remain on the company payroll as an adviser through the end of the year.
Ryan, 59, an attorney, spent years rising in the Reagan administration, eventually becoming a top presidential aide and key leader in the construction of his presidential library and numerous other initiatives after Reagan left office in 1989.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 2 September 2014 15:37 (eleven years ago)
wow
the Post has its problems but Politico is a garbage dump by comparison
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
And the guy's Reagan administration background makes it worse. No way he would sign off on getting rid of W. Post's neo-con editorial page editor Fred Hyatt, or make him add a few more guest lefty op-eds
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:26 (eleven years ago)
surely this paper is only read by apparatchiks and ppl w/ TV shows?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
"read"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:36 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/09/louisiana_gay_marriage_ban_uph.html
Figures a Reagan-appointed District Court judge would be the first to uphold this ( btw Judge Feldman had also served on the FISA court)
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 4 September 2014 13:55 (eleven years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/us/bob-mcdonnell-maureen-mcdonnell-virginia-verdict.html?_r=0
Guilty for both on multiple counts!
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 4 September 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
Woo
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Thursday, 4 September 2014 19:50 (eleven years ago)
so, the KS senate race is batshit now?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/stroke-of-luck
― goole, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
there are Democrats in Kansas?
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:41 (eleven years ago)
yeah I'm still trying to wrap my head around whatever is going on there
― anonanon, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:42 (eleven years ago)
the chances of a GOP "surge" in November looking slimmer. They'll probably take the Senate but it won't be a "repudiation" or whatever C. Todd says.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:43 (eleven years ago)
near as i can make out, the dem quit, clearing the field for a non-nuts "independent" purple republican type dude
but i guess after some legal wrangling, the dem will not be removed from the ballot after all
...to an extent
― goole, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
with an added element of alleged ratfuckery
According to a statement published by the Washington Post, Taylor said he had consulted with Kobach's office in drafting his paperwork to withdraw his name from the ballot. Taylor said he had spoken specifically with Brad Bryant, director of elections and legislative matters in the secretary of state's office."I again confirmed with Mr. Bryant that this notarized letter removed my name from the ballot," Taylor said. "He again said 'Yes.'"Kobach was asked about Taylor's statement after announcing his decision Thursday."At no time did Mr. Bryant state that the filing that Mr. Taylor gave was sufficient," Kobach said.
"I again confirmed with Mr. Bryant that this notarized letter removed my name from the ballot," Taylor said. "He again said 'Yes.'"
Kobach was asked about Taylor's statement after announcing his decision Thursday.
"At no time did Mr. Bryant state that the filing that Mr. Taylor gave was sufficient," Kobach said.
― anonanon, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
so really, nothing's the matter with Kansas
C.(HairyAssholeFace) Todd will have his repudiation by declaring it so
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
is that a pun I don't get
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Thursday, 4 September 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:41 (59 minutes ago) Permalink
Sebelius was governor.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 4 September 2014 21:42 (eleven years ago)
And Chuck Todd will talk about it on the new Meet the Press with Luke Russert and Morning Joe S....
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/rip-mtp.html
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 4 September 2014 21:51 (eleven years ago)
Brian Williams is a great nightly news anchor and Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow are frequently good in primetime MSNBCland, but the network should dump EVERY OTHER PERSON they currently employ in the news/cable news departments and start fresh.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 4 September 2014 22:02 (eleven years ago)
hey, I got a robocall from HRC urging a vote for Andy Cuomo; then one from MARK RUFFALO in support of Zephyr Teachout! As if I hadn't made up my mind already.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 September 2014 16:56 (eleven years ago)
HRC is now FOK, btw
(Friend of Kissinger)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/09/05/hillary_clinton_henry_kissinger_pals.html
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 September 2014 16:58 (eleven years ago)
Does hs vote in NYS? This is important information, someone should tell her.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Sunday, 7 September 2014 17:00 (eleven years ago)
So is there any legit reason NOT to vote for Teachout/Wu for the primary on Tuesday? I guess I'll put on some pants and throw in a good 'ol meaningless protest vote
― Nhex, Sunday, 7 September 2014 23:48 (eleven years ago)
omg, ppl interposing their bodies between Cuomo and Teachout so he doesn't have to acknowledge her at the Labor parade... l'etat, c'est Andy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/06/zephyr-teachout-andrew-cuomo_n_5777532.html
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 September 2014 01:59 (eleven years ago)
I somehow missed Chuck Todd's panelists Andrea Mitchell, Morning Joe, a Buzzfeed guy, and a Washington Post reporter discussing politics in between segments of Todd's Obama interview...Actually missed his Obama interview also. Chuck probably thinks that's an edgy insiders and outsiders panel
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 September 2014 13:54 (eleven years ago)
I shouldn't be stunned at what a fucking bad move this delay in executive action was. So you pissed off your base – not a portion of your base, your base – because you want to help Kay Hagan and Mary Landrieu's election chances?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 September 2014 17:28 (eleven years ago)
waggin' the dog
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 September 2014 17:29 (eleven years ago)
taking the base for granted is standard operating procedure
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
what's the base gonna do, gin up lefty primary challengers?
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:33 (eleven years ago)
the GOP is already yelling impeach impeach anyway. Might as well do the bold and moral thing to honor your commitment to the people who will guarantee your party holds the presidency in '16.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 September 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
"What're ya gonna do, vote Republican?"
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bulworthy.jpg
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 September 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)
it's true I'm not sure what the calculus is here - is he afraid that if the GOP takes the Senate he'll get impeached? that scenario still seems kind of unlikely to me but I dunno. I don't know what he would hope to accomplish even if the Dems do keep the Senate, he's obviously aware of the complete intransigence of Congress and the likelihood that that will continue/get worse through the end of his term so in a way who cares if they keep the Senate or not. O's only role for the next two years will be to maintain office and veto shit (assuming anything actually gets passed at all).
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
Of course it's a cynical hold your nose situation. There's not a strong "base" vote in the close-call Senate races, and no strong base candidates either. This way there's a slight chance to keep the Senate, and yeah it just means Hagan and Landrieu (but that is slightly better than Republicans there).
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:43 (eleven years ago)
SAAAAAVE THE SENATE, or ARRRRRRMAGEDDON
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 September 2014 17:46 (eleven years ago)
nah, we'll just get the early '00s again. that was bad enough
― Nhex, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
golden days of civil liberties in retrospect
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 September 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
http://feministing.com/files/2013/02/clinton-finger.gif
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 September 2014 18:48 (eleven years ago)
@ggreenwald Dem Sen. Bill Nelson says ISIS is "a clear and present danger" & wants to "fly their black flag over the White House"
they have a black flag? i thought they were just a minor threat!
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 September 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)
my senior senator!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 September 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
They'll have to bring the Minutemen back from the border.
― pplains, Tuesday, 9 September 2014 18:56 (eleven years ago)
Probably belongs more on a Letterman thread, but I found it funny.
http://crooksandliars.com:8080/cltv/2014/09/late-show-chuck-todd-it
― clemenza, Tuesday, 9 September 2014 22:58 (eleven years ago)
so Prince Andrew of NY, the future POTUS Apparent, is losing 40% of the vote in his reelection primary to a law professor and a standup comic who each spent no money on ads or mailers.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 September 2014 02:36 (eleven years ago)
how did you get up the nerve to run?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 September 2014 02:41 (eleven years ago)
haha -- saving myself for Schumer
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 September 2014 02:45 (eleven years ago)
honestly, i was expecting a much more humiliating defeat
― Nhex, Wednesday, 10 September 2014 02:46 (eleven years ago)
Another day, another war time president:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/10/obama-wants-a-blank-check-to-fight-isis-and-congress-is-ready-to-give-it-to-him.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 September 2014 22:58 (eleven years ago)
disappointed in Mikulskik :(
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 10 September 2014 23:05 (eleven years ago)
Mikulski
i'm not surprised obama wants to play to his strengths - assassinations.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 10 September 2014 23:07 (eleven years ago)
heehee
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 10 September 2014 23:44 (eleven years ago)
― wmlynch, Wednesday, 10 September 2014 23:53 (eleven years ago)
x-post- she ended up with around 35% of the vote
On election night the story flashed around Twitter that Teachout couldn’t even call Cuomo to concede personally, a campaign tradition, because he refused to give her his phone number.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:33 (eleven years ago)
34.3%, and another 3.6% for the comedian Randy Credico, who for some reason gets ~10-20,000 votes in pretty much every NY/NYC election. Even for a stunt candidate he gets no appreciable ink, I don't know how he does it.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 September 2014 14:12 (eleven years ago)
he hands out flyers for his campaign in times square
― Mordy, Thursday, 11 September 2014 14:35 (eleven years ago)
what NY residents spend time in Times Square?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 September 2014 14:36 (eleven years ago)
Credico appears in lefty media--I've heard him on Sam Seder's show a few times. Plus there's a documentary about him.
― Now you're messing with a (President Keyes), Thursday, 11 September 2014 14:56 (eleven years ago)
lol this guy
http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/10/ted-cruz-booed-off-stage-at-middle-east-christian-conference-video/
― goole, Thursday, 11 September 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
Haha man his prez run is gonna be a treat
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 September 2014 19:32 (eleven years ago)
crosspost blast from the irrelevant:
http://wonkette.com/559940/anchorage-pd-palins-were-present-at-20-person-brawl-fate-of-hos-weave-unknown
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 September 2014 19:35 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/us-threatened-massive-fine-to-force-yahoo-to-release-data/2014/09/11/38a7f69e-39e8-11e4-9c9f-ebb47272e40e_story.html?hpid=z1
The U.S. government threatened to fine Yahoo $250,000 a day in 2008 if it failed to comply with a broad demand to hand over user communications — a request the company believed was unconstitutional — according to court documents unsealed Thursday that illuminate how federal officials forced American tech companies to participate in the National Security Agency’s controversial PRISM program. The documents, roughly 1,500 pages worth, outline a secret and ultimately unsuccessful legal battle by Yahoo to resist the government’s demands. The company’s loss required Yahoo to become one of the first to begin providing information to PRISM, a program that gave the NSA extensive access to records of online communications by users of Yahoo and other U.S.-based technology firms.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 September 2014 16:21 (eleven years ago)
sorry for bringing palin into this but it's just too good:
“To claim last night, also, our president saying ISIS is not Islamic, um, ISIS says they’re Islamic,” Palin continued. “They are so full of deception that America should be concerned with the policies that are going on. And, as I watched the speech last night, Sean, the thought going through my mind is ‘I owe America a global apology. Because John McCain, through all of this, John McCain should be our president.’ He had the advice, today, still giving it to Barack Obama, and he will not listen to it, about the residual forces that must be left behind in order to secure the peace in Iraq that we had fought so hard for.”
(h/t ned)
looooooooool
― Karl Malone, Friday, 12 September 2014 16:26 (eleven years ago)
Despite US government having Yahoo data they couldn't foresee Isis, or prevent Palin from running her mouth.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 September 2014 16:34 (eleven years ago)
I owe America a global apology
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 12 September 2014 16:51 (eleven years ago)
America is the only country
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 September 2014 16:54 (eleven years ago)
a global apology
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 12 September 2014 16:56 (eleven years ago)
it takes a lot for palin to make the news these days since everyone is pretty inured to her shenanigans. it's possible that she knew she had to say something incredibly hilarious and stupid to draw attention away from the big fistfight party thing that apparently happened a few days ago
― Karl Malone, Friday, 12 September 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
i can't believe you guys are all over her usual dribble instead of my fistfight party posts yesterday
also i'd prefer a viking funeral end for Amurrica next to this death by a thousand cuts atp
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 September 2014 17:21 (eleven years ago)
not with a bang but an etc.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Friday, 12 September 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
http://abcnews.go.com/International/government-threatened-foley-family-ransom-payments-mother-slain/story?id=25453963
this is deeply fucked up. you can't threaten a mother who is desperately trying to save her son. you just can't.
― k3vin k., Friday, 12 September 2014 17:42 (eleven years ago)
That's a shitty situation, but if you let the family go ahead with the ransom, which of course they're going to want to do if they can, it does encourage more of this.
― Nhex, Friday, 12 September 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
here we go
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/217544-group-led-by-nunn-donor-and-adviser-under-investigation-for
― goole, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:04 (eleven years ago)
what's the over/under on impeachment once the GOP retakes the senate?
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 12 September 2014 21:09 (eleven years ago)
Oh well ffs. Not like Nunn was a beacon of liberal righteousness, but people on the fence have been looking for any excuse to vote for the white guy Republican.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:14 (eleven years ago)
once again a totally racially charged story where the word "race" is never mentioned once
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:33 (eleven years ago)
will never happen
what would the charges be
"presidenting while black" doesn't count
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
benghazi'ing under the influence
― Mordy, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
off the top of the head, i can name 310 charges.
whoops what are the chances it looks like someone else already thought of the same 310 charges and then published this a couple years ago:
310 Articles of Impeachment against Obama
― Karl Malone, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:36 (eleven years ago)
lol @ "Betrayal of Arizona" wait let me look that up in the criminal code
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 September 2014 21:54 (eleven years ago)
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/09/institute_for_justice_lawsuit_against_philadelphia_libertarians_fight_civil.html
― Mordy, Friday, 12 September 2014 23:33 (eleven years ago)
Good news at least: — Democrats have reversed the partisan imbalance on the federal appeals courts that long favored conservatives, a little-noticed shift with far-reaching consequences for the law.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 14 September 2014 11:44 (eleven years ago)
tell that to thomas frank
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/14/all_these_effing_geniuses_ezra_klein_expert_driven_journalism_and_the_phony_washington_consensus/
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 14 September 2014 13:04 (eleven years ago)
x-post--that Senate move limiting filibusters did pay off a bit. Nice.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 September 2014 14:09 (eleven years ago)
Oh South Carolina...
It’s probably not a coincidence that Sanford’s making this latest maneuver when he’s running unopposed for re-election in November. Perhaps by 2016 he’ll have fought off Jenny in court, or obtained her silence, or at least succeeded in getting his constituents to stop paying attention to her. The constant reminder of his disgrace, Benen, will be out of the picture (at least for now; the Facebook post, incredibly, seems to leave a weasely door open to a future resumption of the torrid romance in the undefined future).
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_09/the_christlike_mark_sanford052085.php
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 September 2014 15:00 (eleven years ago)
Does Thomas Frank think a populous left Dem could win there?
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 September 2014 15:03 (eleven years ago)
Is there a reason why the local Repubs haven't just replaced him by now?
― Nhex, Monday, 15 September 2014 15:13 (eleven years ago)
how do you replace Thomas Frank?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 15 September 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
the king and his courtiers
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/13/obama-journalists-isis-speech_n_5816494.html?1410651263
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Monday, 15 September 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
lol just remembered thishttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mark-sanford-defeats-stephen-colberts-518916what is up with that South Carolina
― Nhex, Monday, 15 September 2014 15:23 (eleven years ago)
If he quit he’d very likely be replaced by some ambitious Low Country Republican pol who would vote exactly the way he does. For that matter, any Heritage Foundation intern could easily duplicate his service to the First Congressional District of SC.
David Brooks and Tom Friedman are too busy meeting with Obama to explain why the GOP hasn't tried to force Sanford out...
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 September 2014 15:48 (eleven years ago)
Tom Friedman and David Brooks should take up super-endurance sailing
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Monday, 15 September 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
David Brooks should be drowned in a bathtub
― Οὖτις, Monday, 15 September 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
endurance bathing
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 03:04 (eleven years ago)
is that the bathtub Grover Norquist wants to drown the guvmint in?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 04:21 (eleven years ago)
Let's just get them all in the bathtub and let them hug it out
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 05:51 (eleven years ago)
Alas, Brooks just sold his fancy DC digs with bathtub for 4.495 mill, 2 days after it was listed. Not sure from where he will be penning his next column re that ISIS meeting he & the other insiders had with Obama
http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/nyt_columnist_david_brooks_lists_cleveland_park_home_for_4.495m/8963
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 17:10 (eleven years ago)
moving to an undisclosed bunker
― Free Me's Electric Trumpet (Moodles), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/16/john-mccain-sleazy-appearing-hit-code-pink-protester-hearing.html
in which a senator sees my code pink friend protest a hearing and says to john mccain "i don't think she's old enough for you, senator"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 19:03 (eleven years ago)
I assume that office building named after Gary Hart
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 19:48 (eleven years ago)
what the
no reason for excitement or anything, since best case scenario is 2 more years of gridlock + executive orders and worst case scenario is 2 more years of gridlock + vetos
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 21:55 (eleven years ago)
Nate Silver was reporting it yesterday too, but only that the GOP's chances were slipping fast.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:03 (eleven years ago)
ta da!
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/16/us-war-isis-iraq-hagel-dempsey-congress-combat
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:32 (eleven years ago)
all this story needs is Hillary to come out in favor of sending troops back
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:36 (eleven years ago)
"close combat advising"
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:39 (eleven years ago)
"no no, shoot THAT guy"
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 September 2014 22:41 (eleven years ago)
Hmmm, maybe Dems chances of holding on in Senate are not so good:
Although below is from a Dem fundraising letter sign by Elizabeth Warren begging me for money
In New Hampshire, a new poll shows that Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen is tied 48-48 against Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown.
In Colorado, a new poll shows that Democratic Senator Mark Udall is down 48-40 against far right Congressman Cory Gardner.
And in Iowa, a new poll shows that for the Senate seat our friend Tom Harkin has held for decades, Democratic Rep. Bruce Braley is tied 43-43 against radical Republican Joni Ernst.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 20 September 2014 15:14 (eleven years ago)
it's a fundraising letter
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 20 September 2014 15:28 (eleven years ago)
I know, but still...
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 20 September 2014 15:35 (eleven years ago)
Republican Arkansas repd doing the dog-whistle in a tv ad
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/sep/19/tom-cotton/tom-cotton-incorrectly-says-obama-turned-farm-bill/
Cotton said that Obama "hijacked the farm bill (and) turned it into a food stamp bill." That’s not correct -- food stamps have been part of every farm bill enacted since 1973. One could say that Cotton and his allies in the House, by seeking a farm bill stripped of food stamp provisions, were actually the ones taking a more radical step, one that Congress ultimately voted against. We rate this claim Pants on Fire.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_09/the_notsosoft_racism_of_tom_co052165.php
Tom Cotton isn’t just lying to rural voters about the history of the farm bill. He’s also playing a deliberately divisive form of racial politics
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 20 September 2014 18:22 (eleven years ago)
I have never cast a vote for Mark Pryor – one of his ads is him sitting in a rocking chair holding his hand on a Bible – but boy, Tom Cotton's the first one to come along to really make me want to hold my nose and vote for the least worst.
I haven't been able to watch a YouTube in months without Cotton popping off at me for 15 seconds. That alone could turn me over to Arkansas' version of Ben Nelson.
― pplains, Saturday, 20 September 2014 18:41 (eleven years ago)
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2014/09/federal_judge_mark_fuller_a_ti.html
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_09/federal_crime052169.php
I bet this Dubya-appointed US District Ct judge in Alabama who just took a plea deal for beating his wife (and had a prior incident with an earlier wife) won't resign.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 20 September 2014 20:52 (eleven years ago)
― pplains, Saturday, September 20, 2014 6:41 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
On one measure (OntheIssues.org), Pryor is more of a liberal - with which his Bible is not inconsistent - than not only Nelson but Grimes, Nunn, Landrieu, Warner, and even Shaheen (who gets a slight edge from 538), and at least gets points for not only voting for the ACA but trumpeting it. Turnout will definitely matter in this one - Cotton leads among "likely" voters, but not among registered ones.
― benbbag, Sunday, 21 September 2014 13:21 (eleven years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:03 PM (5 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― curmudgeon, Saturday, September 20, 2014 3:14 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Don't make too much of the horserace-watchers' story of the week. Most of the "changes" in the races over the last few weeks if not months have been natural ones that have less to do with how people feel about the candidates and more to do with who picks up the phone where - you tend to see changes (usually to the right) around the Memorial Day-and-post and pre-to-Labor-Day vacation periods, and then things settling as you get into September, when people have returned indoors to work and (moved back to) school.
Within that larger trend, there may have been some real changes in sentiment recently as the debates start and, more significantly, big ad buys take over the airwaves, but the only major changes in the bigger picture are the Republicans' late selection of a candidate in Alaska, and the Democrat dropping out in Kansas. Those aren't necessarily equal forces, but they are opposite ones, such that the overall picture is not dramatically changed.
That bigger picture looks to me pretty much the same as it always has - the Dems have a greater than 50% chance of holding the Senate, but the GOP also has a significant chance, probably over 25%, of taking control. I expect the GOP to pick up 3 open red-state seats (MT, SD, WV) and perhaps add a fourth, fifth or sixth by knocking off Democratic red-state incumbents (in AR, which may lean GOP but will come down to the ground game if debates don't move the needle; AK, where the lack of good polls, plus the state's independent orientation, makes the race too hard to call; and LA, a tossup that will go to a similarly difficult to predict December runoff), but even with a sixth seat, they won't get control if they lose to the Independent in KS (and he caucuses with the Dems), as appears increasingly likely. It's certainly possible that they could hold KS and/or take one or more of the purple-state seats (NC, IA, CO, NH) to get there, but it's also possible that the Dems+Indies can come out of this still holding 52-53 of their current 55.
― benbbag, Sunday, 21 September 2014 13:48 (eleven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:55 PM (5 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Wrong wrong wrong. The worst-case and hardly-unrealistic scenario involves the following:- Control of the budget leading to massive social spending cuts - Gutting the ACA through regulatory "oversight," with repeal votes to move the negotiation needle, and cuts to abortion funding (planned additional restrictions will get vetoed)- Doing much the same to financial regulation and putting corporate tax cuts on top (and I wouldn't automatically assume a veto)- Veto-proof majorities for Keystone XL and the like- Blocking any further Democratic judicial appointments, perhaps even to the Supreme Court- Partisan "scandal" witchhunts, potentially even resulting in trumped-up impeachment hearings for our first Black President (effectively a legislative lynching, or at least the formation of a mob)- Etc.
The best case might be closer to the mark, but I definitely wouldn't rule out an immigration bill, especially If the perennial undercounting of the hispanic vote in CO (and perhaps others this year) continues, producing a bigger than expected Udall win (and potential similar effects in other states - KS? NC?), that could help lead the GOP to confront demographic realities in 2016.
― benbbag, Sunday, 21 September 2014 14:30 (eleven years ago)
There will also be attempts to change the regulatory process to make executive action (which is hardly limited to executive orders) much slower and more difficult.
― benbbag, Sunday, 21 September 2014 14:31 (eleven years ago)
If I have to call the races today, I'll say:
AK - could be close, but GOPAR - GOP, but I'm not sure of thatCO - DemGA - GOPIA - close, but DemKS - Ind, though a bit early for that callKY - GOPLA - too close to call, really, but I'll give it to the Dem by a hairMI - DemNC - DemNH - Dem
GOP picks up 5(-6) seats, and loses 1, leaving a 51-49 (or 50-50) balance in favor of the Dems+Indies.
― benbbag, Sunday, 21 September 2014 14:50 (eleven years ago)
Ack, I mixed up AK and AR. Reverse the predictions.
I don't care about losing the Senate so much as defeating Rick Scott.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 21 September 2014 17:16 (eleven years ago)
hoping you're right about NC but the voting changes here are reaaaaaal shitty and people were early-voting in droves before
I basically expect unchallengeable shenanigans
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 21 September 2014 17:20 (eleven years ago)
AK - could be close, but GOPAR - GOP, but I'm not sure of that
Welcome back.
― pplains, Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:09 (eleven years ago)
RIP permabans
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
may as well lay down the law as well:
AK - A tough fight, but in the end inertia winsAR - It all depends on voter turnout hereCO - A long history of senators, could go either wayGA - Could be a surprise second to Nunn!IA - A strong turnout for people thinking that Max Ernst is running for National Junior Honor Society vice-president secures the W for another person named ErnstKS - Corn stalks everywhere, collective psychosis, ultimate party, suddenly it's Nov 5 and no one votedKY - JELLY, shipped to KS for their corn psych partyLA - Leaning toward the politician who tongue is farthest up the oil industry's ass: too close to call, they'll have to have a tongue-off sudden death special on ShowtimeMI - Putting $1 on the idea that the election won't be held - if I'm right I will be extremely rich and if I'm wrong, hey it's only $1NC - Slight Dem victory, but a GOP victory as well - one of these victories will be spiritual while the other will result in holding office and making decisionsNH - Leans Dem, but also leans GOP
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:34 (eleven years ago)
this is the election of the year, no doubt
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:35 (eleven years ago)
single most important day for elections this year
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 21 September 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
as you get into September, when people have returned indoors to work
ah yes, those autumn days when workers bring their laptops back inside and the squirrels reclaim the office parks
― Now you're messing with a (President Keyes), Monday, 22 September 2014 01:29 (eleven years ago)
great post KM obv but in KS there's very little corn, more like vast empty spaces with the occasional cow, except in sw ks where there is nothing but cows. thinking it'll be a cow methane induced psychosis. o/w otm
― droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 22 September 2014 07:13 (eleven years ago)
worst case scenario is 2 more years of gridlock + vetos
Vetoes have limited utility over budgetary matters.
For a very long time Congress has been reluctant to use their power of control over the budget to override the power of the executive, because it was considered too radical and disruptive. The tea-party radicals have tossed aside this conventional wisdom are gung-ho to get control of government via the budget. While I don't believe that there are yet a majority of true firebrand radicals among congressional republicans, but the numbers of wild-eyed crazies are substantial atm and if you add the lip-service radicals, they are at or near a majority of the caucus. If the republicans take the Senate the lip-service radicals will feel compelled to move from words to actions in order to keep up appearances and the crazies will truly be in charge.
The only question would be how far they'll go, not which direction.
― Aimless, Monday, 22 September 2014 17:24 (eleven years ago)
In lighter news, this should delight Shakey:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/mitch-mcconnell-is-a-turtle-says-wikipedia-edit.html
Someone in the U.S. House of Representatives has been spending way too much time on Tumblr. According to Congress Edits, the Twitter account that tracks Wikipedia edits made from IP addresses in Congress, one anonymous jokester edited Minority Senate Leader Mitch McConnell's Wikipedia page to say he's a turtle.The edit reads:http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/22/22-mcconnell-otherkin.w529.h80.png
The edit reads:
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/22/22-mcconnell-otherkin.w529.h80.png
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Monday, 22 September 2014 18:46 (eleven years ago)
he's not a turtle he's a blobfish get it right people
― Οὖτις, Monday, 22 September 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
congressedits is going ham today
― goole, Monday, 22 September 2014 18:47 (eleven years ago)
I really do not give a rat's ass who controls the Senate. Going down the drain fast or kinda fast, what a vital choice.
Chris Hedges on "inverted totalitarianism" and the coming climate revolt:
Clinton, in exchange for corporate money, transformed the Democratic Party into the Republican Party. This was diabolically brilliant. It forced the Republican Party to shift so far to the right it became insane....
The Obama administration, in return for financial support from these kingpins of carbon, has cynically undermined international climate treaties, a fact we discovered only because of the revelations provided by Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks. It uses its intelligence agencies, these revelations revealed, to spy on those carrying out climate negotiations to thwart caps on carbon emissions and push through useless, nonbinding agreements. The Obama administration has overseen a massive expansion of fracking. It is pushing through a series of trade agreements such as the TPP and the TAFTA that will increase fracking along with expanding our exports of coal, oil and gas. It authorized the excavation of tar sands in Utah and Alabama. It approved the southern half of the Keystone pipeline. It has permitted seismic testing for offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, the East Coast and in parts of Alaska, a process that kills off hundreds of sea mammals. It authorized drilling within four miles of the Florida coastline, violating one of Obama’s 2008 campaign promises. This expansion of offshore drilling reversed 20 years of federal policy.
If we appeal to self-identified liberals in the establishment who have no capacity or desire to carry out the radical reforms, we will pour energy into a black hole. And this is what the corporate state seeks. It seeks to perpetuate the facade of democracy. It seeks to make us believe what is no longer real, that if we work within the system we can reform it. And it has put in place a terrifying superstructure to silence all who step outside the narrow parameters it defines as acceptable.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_coming_climate_revolt_20140921
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:51 (eleven years ago)
what a vital opinion
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:53 (eleven years ago)
I mean, you don't give a shit – that's established. Not giving a shit about other people is how the GOP and its Democratic allies function. If you gave a shit about how control of how state legislatures and Congress will affect the lives of women, parks and recreation, and the climate – in other words, people and things not Dr. Morbius – then you can least claim you're a citizen.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:56 (eleven years ago)
for how long?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 14:57 (eleven years ago)
https://twitter.com/vanillaice/status/514255199112683522
― goole, Tuesday, 23 September 2014 15:06 (eleven years ago)
can we have a local politics thread 2014 so we can all feel some political efficacy
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Tuesday, 23 September 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
I see nothing changes around here, all around.
I was all prepared to be cheered by Dr. Morbius' interest in climate, the issue above all others imo, until the completely clueless post above - the leftist equivalent of climate denial, and I'd suggest quite possibly the product of a fossil fuel industry astroturf operation if Sunday's big-tent-approach, a strategy I agree with even if it admits into the tent large swaths of the paranoiac, dumb, or simply ill-informed left, didn't make clear how probable it is the result of people who think they're the good guys - reconfirmed that he's part of the problem.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 05:52 (eleven years ago)
Something's changed, you used to be permabanned.
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 08:08 (eleven years ago)
which dickhead is benbbag?
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 08:10 (eleven years ago)
read his name backwards morbs
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 09:06 (eleven years ago)
and twat
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 10:59 (eleven years ago)
the choking on Dem donkey dick sounds like sllab
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 11:19 (eleven years ago)
but all children adopted by Bill and Hil sound alike
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 11:20 (eleven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ByTaTNbIcAEsKZX.png
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:05 (eleven years ago)
gabbneb. it's gabbneb. ben b bag backwards is gabbneb.
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:16 (eleven years ago)
You know what's backwards? CHIROPRACTIC CLINICS!
― pplains, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:18 (eleven years ago)
Whiney used benbbag years ago, so 'balls' is about as original as most inbred assholes.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:19 (eleven years ago)
it's not balls. it' gabbneb. balls is not gabbneb.
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:20 (eleven years ago)
That's just what balls would want you to think, stevie.
― how's life, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:21 (eleven years ago)
Sunday's big-tent-approach, a strategy I agree with even if it admits into the tent large swaths of the paranoiac, dumb, or simply ill-informed left
we agree there, plenty of Rodham2016 zombies in attendance along with the vegan fascists.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:25 (eleven years ago)
are we thru the looking glass here ppl?
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:26 (eleven years ago)
"vegan fascists" lol leave it to Morbs to shit down the throats of people who are probably more on the right side of some important sustainability issues. I would expect nothing less!
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:45 (eleven years ago)
I'm talking about the ones with the "CARNIVORES, STOP KILLING MY PLANET" signs. You know, self-righteous pricks.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:49 (eleven years ago)
I know a few.
Are they wrong?
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:56 (eleven years ago)
yes, let's definitely ban hamburgers before we shut down the coal mines and stop fracking.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:05 (eleven years ago)
Didn't realize those were the options on the table, thanks for clearing it up!
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:10 (eleven years ago)
hot dogs and curly fries on the table plz
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:11 (eleven years ago)
seriously who let gabbneb back in here
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
Symmetry required it
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:16 (eleven years ago)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:05 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah I mean I realize we should work on all fronts, there's more than enough "front" to go around and everyone should take their niche issue and work the HELL out of it. But like I said the oth day when I got mad at bros on twitter using the #floodwallstreet hashtag to complain that protestors were WEARING SHOES and USING PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES, it's not like most people are ever going to move to the woods and hunt their own tofu. There are lots of larger evils that have reasonable, equitable solutions we should pursue before everyone not being vegan is our biggest problem.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:18 (eleven years ago)
yes thank you
I happen to agree w/ the ppl with signs against the Cuban embargo and Israeli bombs, but that was not the place for those either.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:22 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/02/08/germany-has-five-times-as-much-solar-power-as-the-u-s-despite-alaska-levels-of-sun/
Re this old article, I guess Republicans and coal and fracking state Dems in Congress won't allow policy changes, and I don't see the Prez encouraging Congress to do so.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:25 (eleven years ago)
don't worry Hillo'beans will save us right gabby
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:28 (eleven years ago)
Y'all get back to me when the little remaining water in the west, having dried up after years of climate change-induced drought, is still being shoved mostly into beef and dairy cattle instead of people.
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:34 (eleven years ago)
lol 1) current drought not climate-change related 2) we grow a lot more in california than fucking cows enjoy your vegetables you thankless bastard
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:36 (eleven years ago)
Like, I don't think everyone should be vegan, but on the "mitigating the damage" front re: climate change -- where we're rapidly approaching the point that that's all we'll be able to do -- taking a very close look at the resource use and pollution effects of large-scale meat and dairy farming, especially as it effects water, is a pretty smart thing to do regardless of what can be accomplished regarding coal, oil and fracking.
I'm lucky enough to be sitting half a mile away from one of the world's largest sources of fresh water. Most of America can't say the same, nor can the world.
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:38 (eleven years ago)
xp You understand verb tenses, right? Thus "get back to me" and "after" etc. and my non-use of the word "current?"
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
And that there are, shockingly, states in the west that are not California? (I KNOW RIGHT??)
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:40 (eleven years ago)
I mean people shouldn't be living in the desert in large conurbations, or irrigating it, like this is so obviously crazy
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:41 (eleven years ago)
from Obama's UN speech:
Mr. Obama delivered a searing critique of Russia’s incursions into Ukraine and promised to impose a rising cost on the government of President Vladimir V. Putin for what he called its aggression. He was particularly critical in describing the downing of a Malaysian commercial airliner over eastern Ukraine in July by what the United States and its allies have said was a Russian-made missile system, and he denounced the subsequent efforts to block recovery teams to investigate. All 298 people aboard were killed.
“This is a vision of the world in which might makes right,” he said, “a world in which one nation’s borders can be redrawn by another, and civilized people are not allowed to recover the remains of their loved ones because of the truth that might be revealed.”
oh he's talking about Russia!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 15:52 (eleven years ago)
people shouldn't be living in the desert in large conurbations, or irrigating it, like this is so obviously crazy
lol yes I do agree about that
Las Vegas should be abandoned
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 16:06 (eleven years ago)
Las Vegas should be bombed from space
― A college wearing a sweater that says “John Belushi” (stevie), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 16:22 (eleven years ago)
save the pinball musum first tho
― WilliamC, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 16:31 (eleven years ago)
you know, when both the NYT editorial page and Sullivan are getting it right, i feel i'm losing my bearings...
This is an illegal war, chosen by an unaccountable executive branch, based on pure panic about a non-existent threat to the United States, with no achievable end-point. Apart from all that, it’s so much better than Bush, isn’t it?
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/09/24/is-obama-pulling-a-bush/
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:26 (eleven years ago)
the (admittedly minor) difference is ISIS beheaded some Americans. Saddam didn't do much of anything.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:28 (eleven years ago)
not that minor when it comes to public justification, chest-beating and a lot more sellable than fake uranium. I can this unfortunately see going down more easily until the public gets sick of this war again
― Nhex, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:43 (eleven years ago)
I personally am only dimly aware of any of this, having sworn off the news for the most part, other than reading ILX.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:46 (eleven years ago)
Congress says they may get around to voting on authorizing this after November. Also, still no regular US troops on the ground yet.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
not that minor when it comes to public justification, chest-beating and a lot more sellable than fake uranium.
p much. it's also different in that ISIS was clearly intentionally baiting the US into action, which is something Saddam never did. Obama loves bait I guess.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)
really the comparison's a bit unfair to bush since he actually got authorization for his war.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 20:01 (eleven years ago)
Congress will totally authorize this they just didn't want to deal w it during the election
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 20:04 (eleven years ago)
let's not pretend there's any sizable opposition
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 24 September 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
Is Robert La Follete dead?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 September 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:06 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Phoenix too. But those are just the more extreme southwestern outliers of the much broader problem of energy-intensive automotive-suburban and exurban/rural settlement. You need to build transit(-oriented development) out, but also induce (to the extent market isn't going to already) people to move back in, including building and subsidizing sufficient affordable housing and investing in creation of centrally-located service and manufacturing etc. jobs while divesting from incentives to create dispersed, resource-intensive extractive industry jobs (something some Democrats are at least temporarily unwilling to do because part of our political system, developed for a fraction-sized rural republic, gives land more weight than population, such that coddling the rural and exurban appears necessary to hold on to some legislative power).
― benbbag, Thursday, 25 September 2014 09:22 (eleven years ago)
There may be technological "solutions" to many of the relevant issues, but, like geoengineering for climate, they're unpredictable and may arrive too late.
― benbbag, Thursday, 25 September 2014 09:25 (eleven years ago)
"something some Democrats are at least temporarily unwilling to do because part of our political system, developed for a fraction-sized rural republic, gives land more weight than population, such that coddling the rural and exurban appears necessary to hold on to some legislative power"
I mean, you can't get elected in Kentucky or West Virginia if you want to shut down the coal industry, and you can't get elected in Alaska or Louisiana if you want to end subsidies for oil and gas.
― benbbag, Thursday, 25 September 2014 09:40 (eleven years ago)
Holder gone.
― akm, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:11 (eleven years ago)
whoah
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:15 (eleven years ago)
lol @ NY Times calling him a "Top Liberal"
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:16 (eleven years ago)
Any indications yet as to why he's leaving?
― busted (art), Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:18 (eleven years ago)
sick of all the bullshit, most likely
― Free Me's Electric Trumpet (Moodles), Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
gonna go fight ISIS
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
I'm not shedding any tears over him
― akm, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:23 (eleven years ago)
let the holder apologism begin i guess. dude was no liberal.
― Mordy, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:27 (eleven years ago)
Mordy otm
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:28 (eleven years ago)
yeah between the "due process? what's that?" and the cracking down on whistleblowers stuff he was positively Orwellian
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:29 (eleven years ago)
yeah but he approved the Marc Rich pardon
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:36 (eleven years ago)
Eric Holder, Derek Jeter: today we say goodbye to two guys who couldn't go to their left for shit.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
Holder, "Top Men", to Quit as U.S. Attorney General
― schlump, Thursday, 25 September 2014 15:58 (eleven years ago)
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:46 AM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i want to give this post an award for top morbiusing
― goole, Thursday, 25 September 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
^agreed
― Nhex, Thursday, 25 September 2014 16:14 (eleven years ago)
I just clicked on Huffpost and saw the headline "ERIC EXITS" and thought it was some Eazy-E anniverary.
― Now you're messing with a (President Keyes), Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
Pretty common for original cabinet appointees to want out once a president's second term is well underway. Holder's no liberal but liberalism in any administration at any time has been an historical rarity. At least he's been marginally better than Mitchell, Meese or Ashcroft.
― Aimless, Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:41 (eleven years ago)
he's a corporatist with a conscience. Bravo for his protesting SCOTUS' Voting Rights evisceration.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:50 (eleven years ago)
If strongly protesting a bad court decision could reverse it, there'd be more to cheer about. :(
― Aimless, Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:52 (eleven years ago)
he did more than that:
The Obama administration filed court papers Wednesday challenging Republican-backed election laws in Ohio and Wisconsin, as the legal fights over voting rights spread beyond traditional Southern borders.
In Wisconsin, the Justice Department filed a brief supporting a previous federal court ruling against the state's photo identification requirement, which was deemed unfair to minority voters. In Ohio, the Justice Department weighed in against a law limiting early voting and same day registration.
Attorney General Eric Holder, in a statement, said the two states' voting laws "represent the latest, misguided attempts to fix a system that isn't broken,'' adding that both measures "threaten access to the ballot box.'' Mr. Holder had previously signaled his department would take legal action against Ohio and Wisconsin.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:56 (eleven years ago)
(from a July WSJ story)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 September 2014 17:57 (eleven years ago)
this is a decent article summarizing most of holder's flaws until the very last paragraph, when the writer suddenly reveals that he actually thinks all the bad things he's just listed were actually good:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2014/09/eric_holder_resigns_the_attorney_general_s_legacy_will_be_about_civil_rights.html
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 September 2014 19:53 (eleven years ago)
haha most of the comments agree!
You write an entire article describing very convincingly how awful his record is, then this?Second, while Holder’s decisions disappointed civil libertarians of all stripes, they were not obviously wrong. Indeed, they were mostly rightwhat is this, a brain farck, or just partisan hack? and this is coming from someone who cannot stand the current Republican party.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 September 2014 19:59 (eleven years ago)
@theharryshearer This Just Not In(TM): New, more moderate head of IS tells press conference: "We beheaded some folks."
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 28 September 2014 15:55 (eleven years ago)
dam
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 29 September 2014 02:27 (eleven years ago)
http://jewishphilosophyplace.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/094.jpg?w=1280&h=960
― Mordy, Tuesday, 30 September 2014 01:12 (eleven years ago)
omg it's beautiful
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 01:29 (eleven years ago)
hahahah
― Nhex, Tuesday, 30 September 2014 01:34 (eleven years ago)
ya never let me down, Post!
"Dem Clintons" sir or ma'am I'm going to have to buy you a drink
no I won't sit with you, good god, get the fuck away from me
but damn, you had a good day today
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 01:38 (eleven years ago)
the only mild chuckle on that page is "liberal"
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 11:56 (eleven years ago)
I posted this on the Supreme Court thread but its relevant here. Supreme Court's 5 member conservative majority stepping in to help Republicans in the upcoming elections:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/30/us/supreme-court-blocks-order-to-restore-7-days-of-voting-in-ohio.html?_r=0
Ny Times has more details
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:30 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
So Ohio is getting rid of the last Sunday before election day Tuesday as an early voting day, and the Supreme Court majority does not think that is suspect at all.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:05 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 30 September 2014 13:09 (eleven years ago)
Kansas Dem Senate candidate as the new Joe Lieberman:
If Orman wins, he’ll most likely caucus as a Republican. That’s because he’s pledged to caucus with whichever party is in the majority, and as things stand, Republicans will already win the majority with or without a Roberts win. Orman won’t say which party he’ll caucus with in the event he’s the tie-breaking vote. In that scenario, Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell will engage in a hilarious “Bachelor”-esque competition to bribe their way into Orman’s heart. But as the overall Senate map has shifted in Republicans’ favor, the probability of Orman playing spoiler has dropped precipitously. “In about 7 percent of our forecast model’s simulations,” Silver writes, “Democrats held the Senate solely because they won Kansas and Orman elected to caucus with them.”
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/30/this_is_not_the_next_liberal_icon_why_dems_shouldnt_get_too_excited_about_greg_orman/
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 20:02 (eleven years ago)
Orman is not a Dem
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 October 2014 20:05 (eleven years ago)
sorry, "Dem-favored indie"
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 October 2014 20:26 (eleven years ago)
Reduced early voting in Ohio....check
Reduced early voting in North Carolina...check
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/219483-court-divided-on-nc-voting-law
In her dissent, Judge Diana Gribbon Motz said she was "troubled" by the district court's belief that eliminating a week of early voting via provisional out-of-precinct ballots gave minority voters "ample opportunity" to cast ballots, reiterating similar sentiments for the same-day registration provision.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:47 (eleven years ago)
http://prospect.org/article/22-states-wave-new-voting-restrictions-threatens-shift-outcomes-tight-races
More details here
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:49 (eleven years ago)
i don't quite get what the ostensible reasoned argument for limiting early voting is, even regarding the "voter fraud" boogeyman
Not only does Texas unnecessarily limit the kinds of IDs it accepts for voting, it also cherry-picks—famously accepting concealed-carry permits but not state-issued student IDs.
― Nhex, Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:57 (eleven years ago)
To be judicious here, you must be a legal resident of Texas for six months to carry a CC permit. Anyone from a different state could enroll at a Texas college and get a student I.D. while still being a resident of their original state.
― pplains, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:14 (eleven years ago)
I mean, yes, it is bullshit, but it's not the same as picking one identical set of rules over the other either.
― pplains, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:15 (eleven years ago)
I mean, it still seems like it's easier to vote in Texas than buy a goddammed beer at the Texas Motor Speedway.
― pplains, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:17 (eleven years ago)
iirc Texas allows you to vote if you're (concealed) carrying a baby wearing a "I messed with Texas" onesie
― droit au butt (Euler), Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:17 (eleven years ago)
Baby has to be concealed in mother's uterus.
― pplains, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:32 (eleven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/10/02/americans-are-ready-to-go-to-war/
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
that could have literally any dateline
― goole, Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
name the last year the US has not been at war xp
when asked "if a draft was instituted," 100% of Fox News poll respondents joined Code Pink.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:35 (eleven years ago)
tbh few wars tend to stay popular after the initial rush has worn off.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:38 (eleven years ago)
that's why pretending all these wars are discrete entities has been such a marvy trick by the corpo-militarist puppeteers.
― son of a lewd monk (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:40 (eleven years ago)
family values!
http://www.wilx.com/home/headlines/Michigan-GOP-Lists-Phone-Number-of-Candidates-Mom-278128151.html
jesus!
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 5 October 2014 02:04 (ten years ago)
It seems fairly clear to me that Orman, who is halfway across the country and a quarter of the way across a century from Joe Lieberman, intends to caucus with the Dems - that article quotes only half of what he's said - unless they have no shot at a majority (which the article again overstates), and even then maybe only if he gets something really tangible out of going to the other side. He's said what he's said because that's what it takes to win in his state.
My forecast is still pretty much where it was, with a bit more hesitation because of how close Iowa looks. If that domino falls, then we're probably going to December in Louisiana (or maybe even January in Georgia).
― benbbag, Sunday, 5 October 2014 04:49 (ten years ago)
ha ha ha -- go fuck yourselves, you vote suppressing republicans
http://jaybookman.blog.ajc.com/2014/10/08/warning-to-ga-gop-demographic-change-may-be-closer-than-it-appears/
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 9 October 2014 00:24 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/EvanMcSan/status/520033590290415616
― goole, Thursday, 9 October 2014 03:44 (ten years ago)
ffs
― the late great, Thursday, 9 October 2014 03:57 (ten years ago)
this is going to be obnoxious isn't it
― i'd rather be arrested by you folks than by anybody i know (art), Thursday, 9 October 2014 04:03 (ten years ago)
man if Sen. Blobfish loses to a Democrat I am going to lol
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:23 (ten years ago)
http://images.smh.com.au/2013/09/13/4743708/blobfish32.jpg
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:27 (ten years ago)
Getting deluged with tv ads in my part of the country for Republican candidates in Maryland and Virginia who vow to lower taxes, and support smaller government. Cliched, formulaic and simple, will see if its enough to get anyone elected.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:33 (ten years ago)
for the first time in recent memory I see more Dem attack ads and ads generally than GOP ones – more than 2012.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 October 2014 17:41 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLPv7p-6er0
I understand the College Republicans are using this for several Republican governor candidates.
― peace, joy, pancake (doo dah), Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:00 (ten years ago)
America used to have a constitution, but now we don't have one anymore
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:07 (ten years ago)
who keeps letting markov chains post to ilx
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:21 (ten years ago)
The Young Republicans seem to know, through some remarkably fine-honed instinct, that using Sen. McConnell as the face of the GOP will not excite young voters.
― Aimless, Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:26 (ten years ago)
I dunno, I remember seeing his picture all the time in comic books.http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Gy8j0Yg3V30/SedE24uSHtI/AAAAAAAAAeg/AP_yqhyLzOU/s200/draw+tippy.gif
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:30 (ten years ago)
― example (crüt), Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:35 (ten years ago)
Number of ads elsewhere
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_10/adsat052412.php
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2014-senate-ads-and-issues/top-10-states.html
In terms of ad quantity, Republicans have a distinct advantage in Iowa, along with Kentucky (as you might expect) and Georgia. Democrats have a notable advantage in North Carolina, Louisiana and Alaska, and the two parties are pretty much even in Michigan, Arkansas and Colorado.
A supplemental chart shows that of just under a million ads run in these nine competitive Senate campaigns, Republicans and their allies have run an astounding 267,000 ads that basically just bash Obama, and another 175,000 attacking Obamacare.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 October 2014 18:52 (ten years ago)
heeey oregon
http://onpolitics.usatoday.com/2014/10/09/oregon-first-lady-marriage-kitzhaber/
― goole, Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:17 (ten years ago)
lol tarfumes
― Nhex, Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:49 (ten years ago)
Meanwhile, in Texas...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/10/10/wendy-davis-is-running-one-of-the-nastiest-campaign-ads-you-will-ever-see/?hpid=z4
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 11 October 2014 22:50 (ten years ago)
If a tree falls on a Republican..
― you walk on the street, grab the rock (President Keyes), Sunday, 12 October 2014 01:06 (ten years ago)
This fuckin' guy...
http://blog.chron.com/texaspolitics/2014/10/abbott-texas-gay-marriage-ban-reduces-out-of-wedlock-births/
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 13 October 2014 09:28 (ten years ago)
karen lewis bowing out of the mayoral race.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 13 October 2014 22:00 (ten years ago)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-karen-lewis-not-running-for-chicago-mayor-20141013-story.html
Karen Lewis, the controversial, combative and charismatic leader of the Chicago Teachers Union, will not run for mayor, significantly boosting Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s chances to win re-election next year..
The decision by Lewis comes after she was diagnosed with a cancerous brain tumor last week, said a source familiar with her medical condition. Lewis underwent surgery and took a leave from her union duties.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:05 (ten years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_10/presuming_extremism_right_out052467.php
Ah yes, the etch-a-sketch theory for allowing Republican candidates to move slightly toward the middle without calling them on thier earlier expressed views and the change
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:10 (ten years ago)
http://www.radioiowa.com/2014/10/14/libertarian-candidate-for-iowas-u-s-senate-seat-dies-in-plane-crash/
possible spoiler candidate in IA died in a plane crash last night
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:52 (ten years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/missouri-republican-obama-domestic-enemy
A Republican Missouri lawmaker said that she meant "no ill intent" toward President Obama when she asked on her Facebook page if the U.S. military was able to oust the president.In a Facebook post last week, Jefferson County Recorder of Deeds Debbie Dunnegan referred to Obama as "our domestic enemy," according to a screenshot published by Progress Missouri."I have a question for all my friends who have served or are currently serving in our military … having not put on a uniform nor taken any type military oath, there has to be something that I am just not aware of. But I cannot and do not understand why no action is being taken against our domestic enemy. I know he is supposedly the commander in chief, but the constitution gives you the authority," she wrote in the post. "What am I missing? Thank you for your bravery and may God keep you safe."
In a Facebook post last week, Jefferson County Recorder of Deeds Debbie Dunnegan referred to Obama as "our domestic enemy," according to a screenshot published by Progress Missouri.
"I have a question for all my friends who have served or are currently serving in our military … having not put on a uniform nor taken any type military oath, there has to be something that I am just not aware of. But I cannot and do not understand why no action is being taken against our domestic enemy. I know he is supposedly the commander in chief, but the constitution gives you the authority," she wrote in the post. "What am I missing? Thank you for your bravery and may God keep you safe."
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:01 (ten years ago)
Wait, she thinks the constitution authorizes an armed coup?
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
pretty sure she just violated this
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
enjoy your visit from the secret service
― Free Me's Electric Trumpet (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
What am I missing?
I'm sure she's great at recording those deeds
― you walk on the street, grab the rock (President Keyes), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
Jefferson County Recorder of Deeds
ya srsly wtf is this
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:07 (ten years ago)
dirty deeds maybe
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:08 (ten years ago)
done dirt cheap!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:12 (ten years ago)
i have to sound a note of skepticism about this. not because the man-on-a-white-horse fantasies of the right don't deserve exposure; they do, and it's clearly the low-level operatives and yahoos that are more likely to show their asses
but really, TPM and other liberal sites live on this shit. a facebook post by "Jefferson County [MO] Recorder of Deeds Debbie Dunnegan". i mean, come on.
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:18 (ten years ago)
the Springsteen song practically writes itself!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:22 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:27 (ten years ago)
Debbie lived in Jeffursssuhn Cownteeee all her liiiiife
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:28 (ten years ago)
god I hate Springsteen
there was a time last week when the most recent TPM post was about a funny thing that Colbert said, and the one beneath that was about something funny that Jon Stewart said.
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:29 (ten years ago)
hit counts, man
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:33 (ten years ago)
didn't TPM used to be more 'serious'
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:37 (ten years ago)
guess u didn't get the memo
― example (crüt), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:38 (ten years ago)
seems like they are cuing off what's flying around on twitter and not what's flying around on blogs REMEMBER BLOGS LOL
― goole, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:39 (ten years ago)
fair
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:11 (ten years ago)
mittmentum
https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/522460277103947776
― goole, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 19:04 (ten years ago)
Columnists at New York Magazine, Esquire, and blogs like Washington Monthly just keep bemoaning that mainstream Repubs can make anti-global warming statements or other out there comments with no consequences, while Chuck Todd and Kathleen Parker and other insiders just keep piling on the Kentucky Dem Grimes for not wanting to admit she voted for Obama
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/10/paul-ryan-yes-i-am-a-nut.html
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 20:47 (ten years ago)
AAAAAARRGH!
[full subject line of fundraising spam mail I just received]
― anonanon, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 20:49 (ten years ago)
x-post --Kevin Drum theory on which things get attention at election time:
The difference is that Grimes was clumsy over her handling of a process issue: her support for a president of her own party. Reporters feel free to go after that. Ernst, by contrast, was crafty over her handling of policy issues: in this case, environmental policy and health care policy. Likewise, Gardner is being crafty about his handling of abortion and contraceptive policy. That sort of craftiness generally invites little censure because political reporters don't want to be seen taking sides on an issue of policy—or even rendering judgment about whether a candidate's policy positions have changed. In fact, being crafty on policy is often viewed as actively praiseworthy because it shows how politically savvy a candidate is.
http://mj-tech.s3.amazonaws.com/ad_w_intersitial.html#interstitial=true&height=67&placement=Interstitial&redirect_url=http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/10/election-rule-34-process-gaffes-matter-policy-gaffes-dont
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:03 (ten years ago)
the View from Nowhere strikes again
― anonanon, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:06 (ten years ago)
Slight boost:
Arkansas high court strikes down voter ID law
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - Arkansas' highest court has struck down a state law that requires voters to show photo identification before casting a ballot.
The state Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a lower court ruling that called the law unconstitutional because it adds an additional qualification for voting.
The Republican-led Legislature approved the voter ID law last year, overriding a veto by Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe, and it took effect Jan. 1. A Pulaski County judge struck down the law in May but suspended his ruling pending appeal.
Arkansas is among a handful of states where voter ID requirements have been in limbo. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed new restrictions to take effect in North Carolina but blocked Wisconsin's voter ID requirement.
Early voting begins Monday for Arkansas' Nov. 4 election.
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:46 (ten years ago)
wtf
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-scott-crist-debate-gets-off-to-bizarre-start-20141015-post.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:43 (ten years ago)
rick scott definitely made a mistake (and deserved the boos), but it is kind of weird that they couldn't remove the fan before the debate, if in fact it was mentioned in the rules. did they buy a customized lectern with the fan sealed into it or something??
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:48 (ten years ago)
"i'm sorry, but i can't move the lamp off of the end table. it's a custom fan-table and they cannot be separated without destroying the entire piece of furniture."
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:49 (ten years ago)
#FloridaMan
― pplains, Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:55 (ten years ago)
Florida!!!!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:56 (ten years ago)
both are lizards that need cooling
"Rick Scott Explains Why He Delayed Debate Over Crist's Fan, CSPAN, 10/15/14"
http://youtu.be/KQceruEiRnQ
― anonanon, Thursday, 16 October 2014 01:16 (ten years ago)
Deadspin published a story claiming GOP senate candidate in CO lied about playing football in high school, and well, it's didn't go so well
Alex Roarty @Alex_Roarty · 1h 1 hour agoAnd it's looking even worse for Deadspin in the Gardner-football story. Yikes. http://www.denverpost.com/election2014/ci_26734964/source-disputes-deadspin-account-cory-gardners-football-career
― anonanon, Thursday, 16 October 2014 01:25 (ten years ago)
meanwhile, gas is down $0.30 / gallon, and the DJIA is taking a beating. oh election season
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 16 October 2014 03:25 (ten years ago)
When gas prices go up, Dems get blamed, when gas prices go down.....subject gets changed to Obama's war on coal
― curmudgeon, Friday, 17 October 2014 14:28 (ten years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nikko-jenkins-nrcc-ad-brad-ashford
that's some good williehortoning right there
― goole, Friday, 17 October 2014 16:45 (ten years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-a-dark-winter-of-ebola-terrorism/2014/10/20/4ebfb1d8-5865-11e4-8264-deed989ae9a2_story.html
A ‘Dark Winter’ of Ebola terrorism?
By Marc A. Thiessen October 20 at 11:05 AM
The world is experiencing virulent outbreaks of Ebola and Islamist radicalism.
What if the two threats converge into one?
― goole, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:17 (ten years ago)
now there's a thought
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:24 (ten years ago)
WHAT IF
― akm, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:25 (ten years ago)
what if the two threats converge to one AT THE COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYOFF
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:59 (ten years ago)
Sweet halloween costume.
― schwantz, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:32 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA5jsa1lR9c
― sweet lids of the stars (seandalai), Monday, 20 October 2014 22:53 (ten years ago)
Davenport, Iowa (CNN) -- House Speaker John Boehner is trashing President Obama's foreign policy on the campaign trail by talking up someone Republicans have spent years running from: George W. Bush.
"Does anybody think that Vladimir Putin would have gone into Crimea had George W. Bush been president of the United States? No!" Boehner asked, and answered, before a group of Republican volunteers here.
"Even Putin is smart enough to know that Bush would have punched him in the nose in about 10 seconds!" Boehner said to an applauding crowd.
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 03:46 (ten years ago)
You sure he wasn't talking about Laura?
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42451000/jpg/_42451564_ap416collar.jpg
FACT: Of those three, GW's the only one who's never killed a guy.
― pplains, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 03:51 (ten years ago)
Well, personally never killed a guy I should say.
― pplains, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 03:52 (ten years ago)
I am with the skeptics
If you are in this camp, you can look at the evidence presented for the Emerging Democratic Majority theory and reasonably conclude that the theory is correct, even if you also conclude that the evidence for the theory has substantial warts (about which reasonable minds can also disagree).
But this just isn’t how I see electoral history. I see randomness and noise, a landscape that is littered with the carcasses of stillborn majorities that politicians were certain would flourish and thrive. I see Democrats winning an outright majority of the popular vote for the presidency a decade after the Civil War. I see Republicans winning the popular vote for Congress a decade after the Great Depression. I see Republicans winning three Senate elections and three consecutive presidential terms four years after being reduced to utter electoral irrelevancy in 1976.
Against this backdrop, it’s just difficult for me to look at the evidence presented for the Emerging Democratic Majority theory and believe that it accurately portrays the future. Even if I were to accept that Democrats were building a dominant coalition – and I’m not even certain the evidence for that is strong -- I don’t see any reason to believe that this majority will be different than every other majority that preceded it: short-lived and quickly upended by some utterly unforeseeable event.
That, I think, is where the conflict really lies.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/10/28/putting_the_emerging_democratic_majority_theory_to_the_test_124460.html#ixzz3HSzSi1ak
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:44 (ten years ago)
"Does anybody think that Vladimir Putin would have gone into Crimea had George W. Bush been president of the United States? No!"
how about Georgie
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:45 (ten years ago)
GEORGIA
Driving through Pennsylvania on the PA turnpike a couple days ago made me aware of the energy policy billboard wars. I saw a billboard that had a huge picture of Yoko Ono, and it said "Would you take energy advice from the woman who broke up the Beatles?." It turns out that is apparently a response (by a DC rightwing pr firm) to a NY Billboard that said: "Imagine there's no fracking, signed Yoko & Sean." I saw no such liberal billboards, just more right-wing energy policy ones--One said "the wind dies, the sun sets, we need reliable energy," and another said: "With coal(with a picture of a lit-up city skyline)/ without coal(just black shade darkness).
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:09 (ten years ago)
"Would you take energy advice from the woman who broke up the Beatles?"
PAID FOR BY SOMEONE WHO NEVER BROKE UP THE BEATLES (2 U.S.C 441d) WHAT WERE WE TALKING ABOUT AGAIN?
― pplains, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:22 (ten years ago)
"the sun sets"
idk science knows when the sun sets thats a pretty big argument in favor of "reliable"
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:25 (ten years ago)
if only we had a reliable source of energy!
http://i.imgur.com/3DSE6ai.jpg
but for some reason the sun keeps going away, seemingly on a nightly basis. good thing it keeps appearing in the morning for some reason
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:33 (ten years ago)
Wait, right-wingers like the Beatles now?
Whatever happened to...
http://conelrad.com/images/communism_beatles_cvr.jpg
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
Love it when these right-wing groups hit liberals right where it hurts. That'll show 'em!
http://www.biggreenradicals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/bgr-celeb-billboards.jpg
― pplains, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:02 (ten years ago)
Big Green Radicals were my favorite in the 90s
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:26 (ten years ago)
'Wake up kids. You got the greenman's disease.'
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:29 (ten years ago)
The Beatles sang "Taxman"
― you walk on the street, grab the rock (President Keyes), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 16:02 (ten years ago)
what's more conservative than believing in 'yesterday'?
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
So, cartoon villain Richard Berman (father of David) is behind Big Green Radicals.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/31/us/politics/pr-executives-western-energy-alliance-speech-taped.html
“People always ask me one question all the time: ‘How do I know that I won’t be found out as a supporter of what you’re doing?' " Mr. Berman told the crowd. “We run all of this stuff through nonprofit organizations that are insulated from having to disclose donors. There is total anonymity. People don’t know who supports us.”
― JoeStork, Thursday, 30 October 2014 21:31 (ten years ago)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:33 AM (Yesterday)
it has been well known for ages that we have no good reason to think that it will!!
― j., Thursday, 30 October 2014 21:33 (ten years ago)
tbh, the sun's variable energy flux is a real problem since energy storage is so bad.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 30 October 2014 22:54 (ten years ago)
That Berman thing is over-the-top. What a complete fucking demon.
― schwantz, Thursday, 30 October 2014 23:11 (ten years ago)
Don't miss the whole transcript: https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1349204/berman-at-western-energy-alliance-june-2014-doc.pdf
― schwantz, Thursday, 30 October 2014 23:12 (ten years ago)
The atmosphere in much of Georgia is a lot like the one I remember from childhood in Jim Crow days, when white racial solidarity dictated conservative political behavior. So yeah, the Senate campaign between the urbane David Perdue and the mild-mannered Michelle Nunn is, under the surface, a real knife-fight involving deeply held and diametrically opposed world views, with race affecting everything. Maybe the Deep South will be healed of its history in my lifetime, but I wouldn’t bet the remnants of my grandparents’ farm on it.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_10/existential_politics_in_the_de052738.php
― curmudgeon, Friday, 31 October 2014 14:42 (ten years ago)
I missed this during the summer... Wall Street water-bearer Schmuck Schumer advocates national adoption of a "top two" primary system in elections to "reduce polarization." Fucking bullshit, it's to evaporate any lefty alternatives to the Republicrats.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/chuck-schumer-is-wrong-about-the-top-two-primary/
― this horrible, rotten slog to rigor mortis (Dr Morbius), Friday, 31 October 2014 14:50 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/InhofePress/status/528249239886114816
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Friday, 31 October 2014 18:39 (ten years ago)
Top two primary is an inane system, if you're going to get rid of partisan primaries just run every election on a Single Transferable Vote or another instant runoff system.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Friday, 31 October 2014 18:40 (ten years ago)
who doesn't support the troops now, foxpublicans?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/01/triple-dippers-60000-veterans-collect-disability-benefits-social-security/
turn in your yellow ribbon bumper magnets, and move to russia!
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 1 November 2014 13:58 (ten years ago)
comments are currently closed for this article
oh man i am hugely disappointed
― sexxx attic (will), Saturday, 1 November 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/31/1340696/-40kg-Of-Cocaine-Found-On-Mitch-McConnell-s-Father-In-Law-s-Boat#
― how's life, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:24 (ten years ago)
http://a5.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/image/upload/w_652/xfzelvbyirt1jnnpmzcb.jpghttp://a5.img.talkingpointsmemo.com/image/upload/w_652/rcurhrymmsf9tdcsvbuk.jpg
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:28 (ten years ago)
In a move that Democrats are lambasting as a voter suppression tactic, Sen. Mitch McConnell's campaign and its GOP allies are distributing a mailer to Kentucky voters with the title "ELECTION VIOLATION NOTICE."It warns of "a possible fraud" and reads, "You are at risk of acting on fraudulent information." It says it's paid for by the Republican Party of Kentucky and authorized by the McConnell Senate Committee '14.
It warns of "a possible fraud" and reads, "You are at risk of acting on fraudulent information." It says it's paid for by the Republican Party of Kentucky and authorized by the McConnell Senate Committee '14.
The campaign of Kentucky Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes has filed a lawsuit to stop Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell's campaign from distributing a mailer that it says amounts to illegal voter intimidation tactics....On Friday night, the McConnell campaign dismissed the Grimes court motion as a "publicity stunt." The campaign tried to turn the issue back on her by pointing to a flyer circulated by the Kentucky Democratic Party which suggests the Republican senator is "leading the effort" to take away African-Americans' right to vote.
...On Friday night, the McConnell campaign dismissed the Grimes court motion as a "publicity stunt." The campaign tried to turn the issue back on her by pointing to a flyer circulated by the Kentucky Democratic Party which suggests the Republican senator is "leading the effort" to take away African-Americans' right to vote.
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
How can that be legal.
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
"Fraud" and "election violations" are criminal terms/accusations
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:31 (ten years ago)
that is vile
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:37 (ten years ago)
i wonder if they mailed it out to everyone, or if it was specifically targeted for districts that lean toward Grimes?
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:41 (ten years ago)
it's fun to laugh at mcconnell for his derpy derpiness, but that is just fucking evil
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 1 November 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
I hold out hope that the polls just suck these days, which I semi-objectively think they still do in Colorado, though the Denver Post endorsement there may have made them a self-fulfilling prophecy. But it sure looks like Iowa is gone, a failure of the candidate (who made a huge gaffe), the campaign (who failed to define the nutty extremist opponent), and perhaps the candidate selection (gender, political skills, maybe background), and as much as I like Udall, I think his campaign may have made some poor choices against the rival haircut as well. If Dems lose both of those, it's almost certainly over for them on election night. If they lose just one, or neither, however, we're headed to December in Louisiana, and January in Georgia. I think the GOP probably picks up and holds those, respectively, giving them control likely regardless of the election night results, but it's too early to call the dynamics or the outcome of either race at this time.
My State-by-State takes:AK - Sullivan (R) is leading by 3-5 points, I think, and I give this to the GOP, with the caveat that the difficulty of polling this state makes it too tough to call with any certainty. AR - Cotton (R) is leading by about 2 points, and while I hold out hope that Dem turnout efforts will make election day voters look more like the RVs who support Pryor (D) than the LVs who don't, I think this one's probably gone.CO - Gardner (R) leads the polls by about 1.5 points to my eyes, but I think the polls here perennially undercount Democratic strength, and that it's entirely possible Udall squeaks by. To do so, however, may require a repeat of the huge turnout drives of 2010 and surrounding years, and I have my doubts that will happen this time.GA - Perdue (R) appears to lead both the November race and the very likely runoff by about 3 points, but this may be another state where the polls aren't great, and Nunn cannot be counted out in either election.IA - Ernst (R) is leading by at least a point or two, which isn't necessarily a lot in such a small state, and I hold out hope that the polls are wrong in this increasingly urban/hispanic one too, but IA is not CO, and this is looking like a tough loss for the Dems that didn't have to happen.KS - Orman (I) is leading, but by a pretty slim margin, perhaps just a point. If he can't hold on, and he may well not, it's over for the Dems, but I tend to think he will. KY - McConnell (R) wins; this one's overLA - Election day results don't matter; this one's going to a runoff, in which I think Landrieu (D) now trails - to the extent you can measure - by about 4 points, but again you don't know what happens over the next few weeks, when the race may become nationalized as the battle for control. If it doesn't, I think Landrieu's chances probably decline as Dems lose interest and money. If it does, I'm not sure she doesn't face a tougher battle either, in a red state, but new attention may refocus on the candidates themselves, perhaps to her benefit.NH - There's lots of talk about this one being close, and it is, with Shaheen (D)'s 2-3 point margin a bit close for comfort in such a small (and somewhat hard to poll?) state, but she's been ahead fairly consistently, and even if close I don't think this one's seriously in contention.NC - This one's close too, but incumbent Hagan (D) has been ahead pretty consistently, by at least a point or two, and I'm pretty confident she holds that lead.
So on election night the GOP should pick up about 6 seats net - MT, SD, and WV, very likely AK and AR, and probably at least one of IA and CO, while probably losing KS. That would give them probable control, but there's still a possibility that they could lose it, by losing in LA and GA, however improbable that may be. If the Dems do hold onto CO (or IA), and Orman wins in KS, they'll only need to win one of GA and LA to hold on. Could be a "fun" couple of weeks.
― benbbag, Sunday, 2 November 2014 17:58 (ten years ago)
If Dems win both CO and IA, of course, we're back at my original prediction - they hold control (assuming Orman wins in KS), however barely, on election night, whatever happens later.
― benbbag, Sunday, 2 November 2014 18:03 (ten years ago)
KY - McConnell (R) wins; this one's over
wonder if the ELECTION VIOLATION NOTICE thing will affect things at all? probably not.
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 2 November 2014 18:13 (ten years ago)
probably not. iokiyar. can't wait for the republican congress to label lolbama "obstructionist" for veto fever. 2002-06 are gonna seem like child's play with majority leader o'connell on duty
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:32 (ten years ago)
still can't bring myself to write "SML mcconnell". boo USA
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:34 (ten years ago)
I did when he was minority leader
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:39 (ten years ago)
I wish I could enjoy the downfalls of Harry Reid and Mark Pryor without having to deal with the nimrods who are going to replace them.
― pplains, Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:41 (ten years ago)
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/carl-hiaasen/article3499678.html
why isn't election day a national holiday in our great republic? i forget
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 2 November 2014 21:18 (ten years ago)
to keep participation down?
― Mordy, Sunday, 2 November 2014 21:29 (ten years ago)
that's what i was taught. curious how the dems don't counterpropose making it a national holiday in the face of open republican disenfranchisement putsches. curious, i say
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 2 November 2014 22:07 (ten years ago)
All they could do is make it a federal holiday. Your average minimum-wage worker would still have to work eight hours.
Early voting seems to be their best item to focus on right now.
― pplains, Sunday, 2 November 2014 22:11 (ten years ago)
why not both? maybe there are lower-middle class / middle-class types who'd appreciate a day off to go vote, when otherwise it would be a pain in the ass to take the morning off/skip lunch/or leave work early, without having to explain anything to their dickhead/asshole bosses?
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 3 November 2014 00:05 (ten years ago)
― benbbag, Sunday, November 2, 2014 1:03 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
And I do think this is possible, though both would be squeaky victories.
If there's a surprise state for the Dems, it could be Alaska, but I'd bet on Georgia, which is seeing the biggest demographic change of any of the states in play.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 13:54 (ten years ago)
fingers crossed
meanwhile in a nation with like 250,000,000 adults, 42 white dudes have fronted one out of every three dollars of superPAC spending money
http://m.thenation.com/blog/186873-whos-buying-midterm-elections-bunch-old-white-guys
holy fuck
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 3 November 2014 14:08 (ten years ago)
On the same basis - poll unskewing - that I'm hopeful about IA and CO, however, I think there may (but only may) be cause for worry about KS
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 14:31 (ten years ago)
This is going to be a bloodbath, I can feel it.
― pplains, Monday, 3 November 2014 14:40 (ten years ago)
it really is.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 November 2014 14:42 (ten years ago)
i suppose we deserve our terrible fate
― Nhex, Monday, 3 November 2014 14:58 (ten years ago)
we sure do. the prosperity will trickle down any day now, just you wait
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:08 (ten years ago)
i admit that i'm totally out of touch with what voters are thinking. do they understand that voting in a republican senate majority means making the gridlock somehow even worse than it already is? and for those that do understand that, is that what they want, or will it just be another disappointment so that in 2016 a new round of candidates can swoop in on the platform of breaking up the gridlock?
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
amazingly, the government shutdowns seem to have been forgotten already
― Nhex, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:16 (ten years ago)
The general thought process goes no deeper than "I'm unhappy, let's give the Other Guys a chance (what did they do when they last had unfettered power? DUH DUH DUH I DUNNO)." We are just a Nation of Morons.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
at least there will be agreement on wars, surveillance, cutting corporate taxes, spiking the torture report, and 'trade deals'
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
i definitely understand the apathy, particularly in places like Louisiana. I don't know how they manage to get any liberal to muster the enthusiasm to vote for Landrieu, I'm surprised she's running as close as she is.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
She's 44% in a three-way. That means Hypothetical GOP Candidate Player 99 has 66%.
― pplains, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:27 (ten years ago)
56%, I'm not exactly Nick Argenta over here.
― pplains, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:28 (ten years ago)
She's 44% in a three-way.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:41 (ten years ago)
I like this campaign strategy of hers...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/10/watch-mary-landrieu-wobble-for-louisiana-voters/
Weeks away from what is quite possibly the tightest reelection bid of her political career, Sen. Mary Landrieu has found her rhythm. The Louisiana Democrat was caught on camera doing “The Wobble” at a recent Southern University tailgate party. This isn’t the first time this election season that Landrieu has let loose at a tailgate party. The video comes just weeks after a photo of Landrieu assisting a young man drinking from a keg at a Louisiana State University tailgate party went viral. The senator is also not the first Landrieu to be filmed doing “The Wobble.” Her brother, New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, was filmed doing the popular dance at a Mardi Gras celebration in 2013
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 November 2014 15:54 (ten years ago)
she found her rhythm doing the wobble
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:56 (ten years ago)
I don't get this obsession with candidates distancing themselves from presidents (andI would've given the GOP the same head shake in 2006). You want to motivate your people, not persuade them to stay home. Plus, a voter is more apt to reward a deluded, firm candidate than a nattering, indecisive one.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 November 2014 15:58 (ten years ago)
― pplains, Monday, November 3, 2014 9:40 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Karl Malone, Monday, November 3, 2014 9:42 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
No it isn't. It's a roughly even year on red terrain. Two years later, we'll fight on blue.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:11 (ten years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 3, 2014 10:58 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Because there aren't enough of what you term "your people" in states that voted for Romney and McCain; the "your people" these Dems have vote Republican at the Presidential level (at least until Hillary comes along, maybe).
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:14 (ten years ago)
― Karl Malone, Monday, November 3, 2014 10:14 AM (57 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Many of these low-information voters don't distinguish between parties, regarding "ending gridlock" - which a GOP senate might actually make likelier than the reverse (for worse, of course) - as a universal positive (cut by the ass-covering (low-information-hiding) skepticism about "the politicians"), because they're too dumb or undiligent to be aware what the actual agendas or records are.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:18 (ten years ago)
Keep in mind that some of these red-state incumbents got elected semi-accidentally in the first place - Begich benefited from Stevens' (age and) scandal, and Pryor benefited from his opponent's divorce, getting reelected by running unopposed. Longer-serving Landrieu has more goodwill built up in her state, including, perhaps, from Katrina in 2008, but that storm has also contributed to the decline of her base, a product in addition of the aging out of the old Democratic(/Clintonian) base in both her state and Arkansas and perhaps elsewhere in the South.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:25 (ten years ago)
Republican Ernst in Iowa has managed to portray herself as sensible, with little coverage of her past support for conspiracy theories; while her Dem opponent's stupid statement about farmers gets repeated again and again
The other day, The Washington Post carried a front-page profile of Joni Ernst by feature reporter Monica Hesse. The piece was particularly striking—a long, warm, almost reverential portrait of a woman candidate charming Iowans by doing it “the Iowa way”—no doubt, an accurate portrayal by a veteran journalist. Hesse did suggest, in passing, that Ernst has taken some controversial positions in the past, such as supporting “personhood,” but emphasized that she has walked them back. Not mentioned in the piece was Ernst’s flirtation with one of the craziest conspiracy theories, or her comments on dependency—or her suggestion that she would use the gun she packs if the government ever infringed on her rights. A Nexis search shows that the Post has had four references to Ernst and Agenda 21—all by Greg Sargent on his blog from the left, The Plum Line, and none on the news pages of the paper. But there have been dozens of references to Braley’s spat over the neighbor’s chickens, including a front-page story. The New York Times had zero references to Ernst and Agenda 21, but seven, including in a Gail Collins column, to Braley and chickens.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/when-conspiracy-theories-dont-fit-the-media-narrative-midterm-election-tom-cotton-joni-ernst/382209/
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:26 (ten years ago)
Yeah, that's, as I suggested upthread, probably the biggest Dem campaign failure of the cycle (other than Walsh's flameout).
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:26 (ten years ago)
Ernst should be selling daisies on street corners.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 November 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
War heros don't do that...
Ernst is a lieutenant colonel in the Iowa Army National Guard and served in Operation Iraqi Freedom. According to her bio, her unit ran convoys from Kuwait into southern Iraq.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:37 (ten years ago)
dems are too stuck up to 'fight dirty', not exactly an inspirational strategy for people who live paycheck-to-paycheck, it would seem
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 3 November 2014 16:37 (ten years ago)
I don't disagree with that, though "stuck up" is not quite right. But I'm not sure that's the right way to drive turnout by Dem-leaning casual voters (primarily single women and hispanics, at least this time around), and the other side would suggest they already do.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 16:45 (ten years ago)
Norm Ornstein on Ernst:
The most common press narrative for elections this year is to contrast them with the 2010 and 2012 campaigns. Back then, the GOP “establishment” lost control of its nominating process, ended up with a group of extreme Senate candidates who said wacky things—Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle—and snatched defeat from the jaws of victory in races that should have been slam dunks. Now the opposite has happened: The establishment has fought back and won, vanquishing the Tea Party and picking top-flight candidates who are disciplined and mainstream, dramatically unlike Akin and Angle.
It is a great narrative, a wonderful organizing theme. But any evidence that contradicts or clouds the narrative devalues it, which is perhaps why evidence to the contrary tends to be downplayed or ignored. Meantime, stories that show personal gaffes or bonehead moves by the opponents of these new, attractive mainstream candidates, fit that narrative and are highlighted....
What it suggests is how deeply the eagerness to pick a narrative and stick with it, and to resist stories that contradict the narrative, is embedded in the culture of campaign journalism. The alternative theory, that the Republican establishment won by surrendering its ground to its more ideologically extreme faction, picking candidates who are folksy and have great resumes but whose issue stances are much the same as their radical Tea Party rivals, goes mostly ignored. Meanwhile, there was plenty of coverage of the admittedly bonehead refusal by Kentucky Democratic Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes to say she had voted for Obama—dozens of press references to NBC’s Chuck Todd saying it was “disqualifying”—but no stories saying that references to Agenda 21 or talking about terrorists and drug lords out to kill Arkansans were disqualifying.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/when-conspiracy-theories-dont-fit-the-media-narrative-midterm-election-tom-cotton-joni-ernst/382209/?single_page=true
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 November 2014 17:46 (ten years ago)
not sure if dems are too 'stuck up' to fight dirty as much as the voters are too fucking stupid to persuade to one side or the other without a simple one liner as 'big government bad' or 'black people are taking all your shit' like the gop employs.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 3 November 2014 17:55 (ten years ago)
I agree to an extent re campaign journalism, but I'm not sure it isn't a bigger problem with campaigns themselves. They're so concerned about sticking to their message that they're unwilling to confront the possibility that the message is the wrong one.
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 18:09 (ten years ago)
Revising based on new polls...IA - I move this closer to the Dems, perhaps into a tie, which I think would mean a Dem winAK - this one's perhaps much closer too, though still with a slight GOP lead that may mean a quite comfortable GOP winNH - this one goes the other direction, slightly closer to the GOP, though still probably safe for the DemCO - no change
― benbbag, Monday, 3 November 2014 18:11 (ten years ago)
Hot Take Classic @swarthyvillain sick of unpragmatic progressives insulting our leaders cause of things they've done. grow up and support them for stuff they say they'll do
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 3 November 2014 20:42 (ten years ago)
Wonder if there's any way to get some folks to move away from "big government is bad and the 47% are taking our money" mentality. Will the Kansas failed experiment change minds there?
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 16:38 (ten years ago)
the 47% is dog-whistle racism so it's gonna be tough i think
― Nhex, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 16:39 (ten years ago)
Brownback stands a good chance to lose, but there's still a few other red states with governors almost as wretched
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 16:46 (ten years ago)
And a few red states who will be adding GOP governors.
― pplains, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:04 (ten years ago)
voting in 'Laska:
“when returning the ballot through the secure online voting solution, your are voluntarily waving [sic] your right to a secret ballot and are assuming the risk that a faulty transmission may occur.”
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/11/03/alaska-election-nightmare/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:44 (ten years ago)
sounds like a sex crime
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:47 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcTP7YWPayU
― bippity bup at the hotel california (Phil D.), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:52 (ten years ago)
was waiting for it
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 17:53 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/bLj2oYN.jpg
sums it up
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:41 (ten years ago)
dying
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:43 (ten years ago)
Which of our uncountable-as-the-sands, impeccably-gray-coiffed, old-white-man politicians is that?
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
that is a man very concerned with ELECTION VIOLATION NOTICES. perhaps the man behind him received one of those notices
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:49 (ten years ago)
old-white-man politicians
that's not an old white man, that's a blobfish
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:50 (ten years ago)
seriously can't stop laughing at that pic, so priceless
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:51 (ten years ago)
xp Thanks, Karl. The photo did not contain enough blobfish qualities for me to easily recognize him.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:51 (ten years ago)
i believe the evidence for what kind of animal mcconnell resembles is overwhelming, and points toward the class Reptilia
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:52 (ten years ago)
please send the shelled turtle back to the kitchen
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:52 (ten years ago)
rumor has it that he's still there, voting, very slowly
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 19:53 (ten years ago)
I can't get over that photo. Fucking brilliant.
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
i'm surprised there aren't more photobombs of famous politicians. you'd think that at least at some point, every single day, someone flips off rick perry in person
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
Sullivan writes one of his periodic valentines.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 20:53 (ten years ago)
that is Mitch, right, and not one of the Koch brothers? I assume that they don't go out in public, but he's a bit hard to recognize with the jowls cut off.
― benbbag, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 21:21 (ten years ago)
Mitch is in.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 00:07 (ten years ago)
he sure deserves it. the most obstructionist congress in the history of the country, in the wake of the worst financial crisis in 80 years. leadership!
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 00:14 (ten years ago)
Meanwhile Florida is becoming a chore. Again.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 00:27 (ten years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1ozyYzIgAAoh00.jpg
asshole
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 00:31 (ten years ago)
pretty inevitable
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:23 (ten years ago)
If I had the money, I'd go down there and straighten out Florida personally. Seriously, your bullshit, Florida, is making life difficult for the rest of us. Grr.
― Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:35 (ten years ago)
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, November 4, 2014 11:53 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:41 (ten years ago)
Political people are like the addendum in that one Christgau guide, "Everything Rocks and Nothing Ever Dies"--the nothing-ever-dies part. I see Ed Gillespie's in a close race tonight, his first election. I think I first saw him on round-tables in the '90s, during Clinton's presidency.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:49 (ten years ago)
oh my fucking god: Tom Brokaw getting wistful about Clinton claiming era of big govt over and stealing GOP positions
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:53 (ten years ago)
this is gonna be a bloodbath, isn't it?
― Free Me's Electric Trumpet (Moodles), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:55 (ten years ago)
Welp. I'm now officially older than one of my senators now.
― pplains, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 01:59 (ten years ago)
http://www.tomcotton.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/6183375765_7905bfbb73.jpg
Dude probably played the shit out of some Mario World and wasn't even high.
― pplains, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:01 (ten years ago)
we have a new governor in PA :D
― Mordy, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:07 (ten years ago)
Governor Woof!
― peace, joy, pancake (doo dah), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:14 (ten years ago)
this evening is depressing me already
providence might elect BUDDY CIANCI mayor again???
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:21 (ten years ago)
― clemenza, Tuesday, November 4, 2014 8:49 PM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
it's sort of a seigneurial flyer for a top party hack, after Terry McAuliffe blazed the trail for the other side in '12
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:27 (ten years ago)
i'm assuming he goes down in flames as poll-predicted, but the NoVA results better start coming in soon
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:28 (ten years ago)
TEXAS: OUR GOVERNOR HAS WHEELS Y'ALL!
(And if you think that's tasteless, consider how he himself treats disabled people.)
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:29 (ten years ago)
dc is going to legalize weed, also - i wonder if the congress is going to try and mess with this one
the ballot initiative was hilariously specific on the details - how many ounces for personal use and the number of plants (6) (with a smaller number of flowering plants - 3) a person was permitted to grow in their home
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:31 (ten years ago)
Most Dem candidates do not have blood.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:42 (ten years ago)
Rauner getting his butt beat in Illinois so far...I guess I can go to bed.
― Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 02:47 (ten years ago)
still lots of votes to count in North Carolina
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:07 (ten years ago)
Is rauner getting beat? I hope but numbers I saw seemed close.
Scott walker in or out?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:29 (ten years ago)
out!
i'm not optimistic but i hold out hope for my people of iowa
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:34 (ten years ago)
scott walker in! forget mary burke
stoked the GOP is sweeping up. really sick of hearing about greedy scientists and their global warming hoaxery, and lazy loser libs complaining prosperity isn't trickling down. so we didn't make the kenyan a one-termer; at least we finally took america back
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:34 (ten years ago)
Local paper just called the race for Rick Scott.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:37 (ten years ago)
not all bad
https://twitter.com/andrecymone/status/529812974471372800
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:38 (ten years ago)
i don't know how to read qualmsley so i'm just going to ignore him
― akm, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:41 (ten years ago)
TED CRUZ FOR SENATE MAJORITY LEADER!
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:41 (ten years ago)
I'm watching New York SD-40 between Terrence Murphy and Justin Wagner. Currently 54% to 47%, respectively. A friend of mine has been up there for weeks 24/7 working on that campaign.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:43 (ten years ago)
CNN calling Georgia for Perdue. Ugh.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:45 (ten years ago)
And
SD-46 (4% reporting)
Cecilia Tkaczyk* (D) 4437 46 %
George Amedore (R) 4143 54 %
---
Tkaczyk won last time by 19 votes in a court-ordered recount fyi
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:47 (ten years ago)
I don't see how the republicans taking the senate will change anything. it was already intractably gridlocked. now they'll just try to pass shit that will get vetoed and don't have the votes for an override. more of the same for two more years, when they're going to face big losses if they don't do something about immigration reform.
― akm, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:49 (ten years ago)
and don't tell me they will actually come to the table and negotiate and compromise.
― akm, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:50 (ten years ago)
they're not going to come to the table, negotiate, and compromise. they're going to shut down the government again, like they did last year, trash the economy, and blame it on the obstructionist muslim-in-chief, to help jeb or whoever win in 2016
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:54 (ten years ago)
they're going to pass a bunch of bills that they swear up and down will save the country and obama won't sign them and the democrats will be portrayed by pretty much everyone as the reason everything is terrible. and now they'll have a 60+ seat lead in the house on top of it, so it's a generation before that changes hands again.
― Clay, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:57 (ten years ago)
change in Senate control means judicial nominations will be a no-go for the rest of Obama's presidency for one
― anonanon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 03:59 (ten years ago)
the fact that the 2010-12 congress set a record for getting the least done, that was broken by the 2012-14 congress, will never be mentioned. all of a sudden obstruction (by democrats) is going to be worse than saddam's 9/11 WMDs
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:00 (ten years ago)
looks like Roberts won in Kansas
― anonanon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:01 (ten years ago)
mark udall gone. that's a bummer.
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:03 (ten years ago)
bet we got a cool guy who sponsored a personhood bill in his place
― Clay, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:04 (ten years ago)
brownback is leading davis. what's the matter with kansas?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:05 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/529835834892357632
"Dems held off on immigration to help Landrieu, Hagan and Pryor, knowing it would hurt Udall. They might go 1-4, if they're lucky."
iowa tv calls it for ernst
https://twitter.com/WHOhd/status/529834919271620609
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:06 (ten years ago)
fuckin shit man
this is some red wedding shit
― Clay, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:13 (ten years ago)
nate silver gives GOP 99% at this pt
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:14 (ten years ago)
why didn't vilsack run? is running the ag dept really all that much fun?
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:15 (ten years ago)
the party that shut down the government last october is poised to win the senate. go america
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:15 (ten years ago)
good luck oregon!
― the late great, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:16 (ten years ago)
Nah, this is pretty much by the numbers. If 2016 goes Republican, that's red wedding territory.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:17 (ten years ago)
morbidly enjoying that this is pretty much the Veep midterms episode come to life
― anonanon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:25 (ten years ago)
http://www.theonion.com/articles/republicans-poised-to-retain-control-of-senate,37366/
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:26 (ten years ago)
no one really cares i guess but GOP senate also means that the confirmation for hundreds of executive branch leadership posts at various agencies gets even slower and more impossible than it already was. it's hard to explain how demoralizing and weird it is to not have a leader for your organization for years on end. i mean of course there are acting administrators and deputies and all that but often the person in charge is obviously just biding their time and doesn't want to make any decision that makes a lasting impression.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:27 (ten years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1nGZogIUAEidie.jpg:large
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:30 (ten years ago)
And SD-46 (4% reporting)Cecilia Tkaczyk* (D) 4437 46 %George Amedore (R) 4143 54 %---Tkaczyk won last time by 19 votes in a court-ordered recount fyi
Had no idea it was that close last time. Voted Tkaczyk, despite her annoying volunteers coming to our house no fewer than five times in the last week.
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:31 (ten years ago)
xpostsorry, that buttpic was an image in this tweet:
Karen Howell @karenehowellFollowGet your butts to the polls. RT @GovJayNixon Voting in #JCMO this morning. Make sure to cast your ballot 11:32 AM - 4 Nov 2014
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:31 (ten years ago)
And the AP has called NC for Tillis. Another proud moment for our state.
― Gatemouth, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:41 (ten years ago)
i guess my friends here who smoke weed can do that now though, so one good thing
― Clay, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:48 (ten years ago)
curious what demands will be attached to the next debt ceiling negotiations. maybe we can finally repeal the capital gains tax?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 04:56 (ten years ago)
I'll be honest, I haven't been tracking national politics this cycle other than, I guess, this thread, which it seems like is sparing me a whole lot of heartburn.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:05 (ten years ago)
$15 min wage passing in SF, $12.25 in Oakland. Recreational weed in DC. Possibly expanded background checks for gun xfers in WA. Transit funding in Seattle.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:12 (ten years ago)
Right, we can do progress at the Federal level and the local level. It's the States that are the problem - the equal power we give to Wyoming and California in the Senate, and the power we give to their Governors to gerrymander the House - and the States are the product of a 225-year-old document written for a country a fraction of its present size. It's time to end unequal voting power, based on land rather than population, in America.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:16 (ten years ago)
as iatee put it once, the Senate fucks us every day
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:18 (ten years ago)
so mia love is losing, in a district romney carried by 30 something. dunno much about her so she could be underperforming that badly for personal reasons but hmmmmmmmm utah
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:22 (ten years ago)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 January 2014 16:49 (9 months ago) Permalink
darn
― the tune was space, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:22 (ten years ago)
that not even a silver lining tho
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:23 (ten years ago)
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:22 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yes, but it's SLC, which is a more progressive place than you'd think, and this or its predecessor district has been represented by a Dem since 2001.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:27 (ten years ago)
Today is horrible.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:29 (ten years ago)
what happens next depends on who's the biggest bastard: McConnell or Cruz. the House is mostly irrelevant, except insofar as it plays into either McConnell's or Cruz's hands.
― 뉴 메탈은 나머지 모든 보지 똥, 거기입니다 최고의 음악이다 (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:31 (ten years ago)
xp that's democracy for you
― the late great, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:31 (ten years ago)
dunno how well the country will stand up to either McConnell offering deals that Obama can't refuse (b/c of his "bipartisan" tic) or Cruz bringing everything to a halt until shit is Teabagger-correct.
― 뉴 메탈은 나머지 모든 보지 똥, 거기입니다 최고의 음악이다 (Eisbaer), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:34 (ten years ago)
I PREDICT A DEMOCRAT HOUSE MAJORITY IN 2044
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:48 (ten years ago)
idk, do congressional districts that are fully submerged by rising sea levels get representatives
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 05:54 (ten years ago)
American Politics 2040: THE GODDAMN REPUBLICANS ARE GERRYMANDERING THE DISTRICTS SO THAT ALL OF THE DEMOCRATIC ONES ARE UNDERWATER
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:18 (ten years ago)
eh, there's nothing you can do in these circumstances except drink it away
ugh
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:19 (ten years ago)
american politics 2014 - barf sandwich
i blame obama, reid and pelosi (srsly)
― the late great, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:20 (ten years ago)
Ted Cruz fucks shit up in the house for sport. The senate will be a circus.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:21 (ten years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ttXKna4lBzE/UI_ya8v3XyI/AAAAAAAAAy0/t0hd0ZAPqi8/s1600/i-voted-vomited-sticker.jpg
― the late great, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:23 (ten years ago)
male sex toys
― hunangarage, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:43 (ten years ago)
you can find my detailed opinion about all this on my ello page
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:56 (ten years ago)
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 06:56 (ten years ago)
i very seriously need to be asleep, but it turns out mia love won.
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:04 (ten years ago)
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) predicted Sunday that her party would hold the Senate in Tuesday's midterm elections, thanks to its "superior" ground games in critical states.
"I think we're going to hold the Senate," Wasserman Schultz said during an interview with ABC's "This Week." "We have a ground game that I know [the GOP] would take over theirs any day of the week."
― salthigh, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:22 (ten years ago)
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1ohUX-CIAEY5-w.jpg
somehow makes me less depressed
― Clay, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:38 (ten years ago)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz should be blasted into space with the Clintons
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:46 (ten years ago)
lincoln. now there's a failed president!
― the late great, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:50 (ten years ago)
She was telling Robert Seigel the same shit as late as 9pm ET Tuesday night.
― Dokken played here for a Ribfest and people were total assholes (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 09:49 (ten years ago)
Seems like a bad night but I'd be interested to see the vote totals for the Class II Senate seats. Before last night, the Senate's composition was determined by the 2008+10+12 election cycles, and the Dems won those elections by 112.7m to 100.6m votes (yeah, I know, bit dodgy to aggregate results over different years, but I can't think of another way of doing it). Subtract 2008 and it's 79.1m to 71.8m. So for the GOP to have a national mandate in the Senate they'd need to win last night by close to 8m votes. Maybe they did.
The House of Reps at the 2012 election was R234-D201, despite Democratic candidates polling slightly more votes (59.6m to 58.2m). So a Dem seat in the House requires 297k votes, for the GOP it's 248k votes. Or, put another way, it takes 1.2 votes for a Democrat to equal 1 vote for a Republican.
And, yeah, there's the whole North Dakota = California, Wyoming = New York thing in the Senate.
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 10:32 (ten years ago)
Back of fag packet calculations: GOP won 2.8m more votes than Dem last night. So Dem Senate candidates polled 5m more votes than GOP candidates 2010-14. There ya go.
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 10:58 (ten years ago)
In Florida, which went twice for Obama, the GOP now enjoys a super majority and the Democratic Party is a standing joke.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 11:50 (ten years ago)
same can be said for the democratic party's standing in most of the USfuckingA apparently. i hope we survive the next two years
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:04 (ten years ago)
oh survival is at stake, huh
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:12 (ten years ago)
Maybe consider moving to Minnesota?
― resting rich face (suzy), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:14 (ten years ago)
I wonder now how much worse it could have hurt candidates in Kentucky, NC, Colorado specifically if they'd actually endorsed Obama policies.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:14 (ten years ago)
So given the GOP essentially had things shut down anyway, how much worse can they make it? Just make Obama veto a ton, unless he totally pusses out and goes voters have spoken bipartisan rollover?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:19 (ten years ago)
it seems fairly obvious that voters generally don't listen to what candidates say, and that's the most blameless thing about them. xp
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:19 (ten years ago)
JiC, did you follow Obama's "negotiations" with the GOP in the first term? The very definition of "pussing out," if he had liberal principles. (He doesn't btw.)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:21 (ten years ago)
can't wait for trans-pacific partnership and immigration reform "negotiations" between the white house and the GOP congress, which will somehow involve privatizing student loans, eliminating the corporate income tax, and abolishing social security
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 12:32 (ten years ago)
Hopefully the Prez won't bring back his plane to cut Social Security benefits via chained cpi based on some Republican support for that, but who knows.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 13:35 (ten years ago)
plan
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 13:37 (ten years ago)
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/latino-voters-low-turnout-less-support-democrats-n241771
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 13:43 (ten years ago)
I had to turn off all of the news channels. C-Span has the best coverage. They are showing demographic breakdowns and minimum wage votes.
― Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 13:55 (ten years ago)
So given the GOP essentially had things shut down anyway, how much worse can they make it?
Experience has taught me not to ask this question.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:01 (ten years ago)
Run-off in Louisiana:
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mary-landrieu-2014-senate-election-112480.html
― Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:02 (ten years ago)
well hey at least there's finally another george bush holding elected office
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/11/04/george-p-bush-greg-abbott-win-big-in-texas/
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:10 (ten years ago)
some interesting stuff here: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/11/04/us/politics/2014-exit-polls.html?smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:15 (ten years ago)
i had braced myself for CO & IA. pretty disappointed about NC & KS.
― sexxx attic (will), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:15 (ten years ago)
Meanwhile in Florida, dismal turnout rates for the young. A higher turnout would've cost Scott the election.
And oof – Brownback!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:17 (ten years ago)
having lived for a bunch of years in KS (though no longer thank goodness), I can say: don't ever hope for KS to do anything but disappoint you.
― droit au butt (Euler), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:17 (ten years ago)
Love how popular minimum wage increases are...something does not compute.
― Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:35 (ten years ago)
yeah so are common sense firearm regs but...
― sexxx attic (will), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 14:44 (ten years ago)
GOPs press conference should consist of one action item - reopen the grand bargain.
Completely destroyed obamas first term, might as well do it again
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:11 (ten years ago)
American Politics 2015-16: Mandate for Destruction
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:18 (ten years ago)
yeah but that would (ostensibly) mean revenue increases, so no go
― sexxx attic (will), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
In local news, this guy actually won one council district over from mine.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-peroutka-20141017-story.html
― how's life, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:28 (ten years ago)
He's an extremist, racist nut, wonder who his opponent was. That's not far from where I grew up.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:42 (ten years ago)
do the british betting shops have a line on impeachment yet
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:43 (ten years ago)
Younger voters were a particular disappointment. In 2012 they represented 19 percent of the electorate but this year they represented only 13 percent, almost identical to their lackluster performance in 2010.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/republican_party_wins_the_midterms_democrats_couldn_t_escape_president_obama.html
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:44 (ten years ago)
Kilgore:
In terms of turnout patterns, yesterday’s electorate looked an awful lot like 2010’s: over-65 voters represented 22% of the electorate and under-30s just 13%. White folks were 75%, not quite the 77% of 2010 but more than the 72% of 2012. It looks like Republicans will wind up winning the national popular vote by around seven points, a bit short of the 2010 landslide but good enough, obviously. Democratic margins among the young and minority voters who did turn out were significantly down from 2012—again, close to the 2010 numbers—indicating most likely that the more conservative among them turned out disproportionately, though we’ll hear some claims about “discouragement” in the Obama coalition.
You can safely ignore a lot of the spin we’re hearing this morning about the “why” of it all—you know, the center-right nation repudiating its incompetent socialist president—and we’ll be spending some time later today and in the immediate future exploring that question, even as we move on with examining a new issue of Washington Monthly that addresses the inequality that can and should be an overriding concern in the next two years. And speaking of that, those in psychic pain today can rest assured that a big piece of the GOP “wave” receded instantly today as we entered a presidential cycle in which the turnout patterns and landscape will be significantly different.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:45 (ten years ago)
Not scientific, but i was by far the youngest person at my polling place yesterday. I'm 44
― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:17 (ten years ago)
Man I am so over having psychic pain over midterm elections, who has the patience.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:17 (ten years ago)
Someone from Kansas and Wisconsin: were Brownback and Walker expected to win so handily? In Kansas I thought Brownback looked like a goner, esp with the state GOP fractured.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:19 (ten years ago)
Not scientific, but i was by far the youngest person at my polling place yesterday. I'm 44― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 11:17 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Prince Kajuku (Bill Magill), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 11:17 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol. me too. 35. There was a woman who came in at the same time I did who I thought looked younger, but I heard her give her birthday and it was 1977.
― how's life, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:30 (ten years ago)
yeah exactly. idk how anyone manages to summon the energy to feign surprise or shocked indignation or whatever about any of this
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:36 (ten years ago)
The only time in my life that a year ending with a '4' didn't end in a shit show for the Democrats was that time the GOP president was hustled out of the White House and flown across the country to a private hideaway.
― pplains, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:38 (ten years ago)
― salthigh, Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:22 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
If there's a silver lining here, it's that DWS (who the Clintons hate/think is clueless, btw) is a goner.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
did anyone like her? all i've seen is relentless mockery from the right and zero defense or even acknowledgment from anyone dem or liberal
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
She's got a safe seat; she can return to it. She's not even an empty suit.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:54 (ten years ago)
Kilgore with more data:
Since Republicans as a whole did little or nothing to improve their image among nonwhite voters, you have to figure the midterm falloff was just higher among nonwhite voters who in 2012 voted Democratic (reinforcing that notion is the fact that Republicans did a lot better among minority voters in 2010 as well). Even among African-Americans, the target of highly visible voter suppression measures, the GOP percentage increased from 6% in 2012 to 10% in 2014. Among Latinos, the GOP vote share jumped from 27% to 35%. And most startling of all, among Asian-Americans Republicans improved from 26% in 2012 to 49% in 2014. Add all these numbers up, and they begin to matter. And it will be an interesting thought-experiment for Democrats to figure out if a return to presidential-level turnout will eliminate the GOP improvement, or we’re witnessing a return to pre-Obama divisions of opinion among minority voters. If the latter is the case, that’s a problem, because a return to pre-Obama levels of white support for Democrats doesn’t look real likely.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:55 (ten years ago)
You know, I tried to get all the kids to get out there and vote for Mark Pryor and James Lee Witt, but they were all too busy playing video games and texting.
― pplains, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
It's almost as if people really liked what candidate Obama was promising and really don't like shitty ass pro war pro drone pro surveillance pro imperial presidency Obama
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
if only
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
But they were fine with those aspects of O in 2012 (or at least saw him as the better alternative). People stayed home in the same numbers as 2010, so while that might be part of it, there's got to be other reasons as well for the lower midterm turnout.
Like why couldn't Debbie W. Schultz have made instagram selfie photos at voting locations a thing...
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:13 (ten years ago)
yeeeah that isn't what's happening. American public totally in favor of imperial president murdering american citizens with drones and no due process. Also in favor of torture, Gitmo, Patriot Act etc.
xxxp
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:13 (ten years ago)
Listening to a W-S interview is apt to drive me out of the house, so it might've worked as a voter drive
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:18 (ten years ago)
Yeah what's wrong with Obomber isn't what the political "objections" to him are, even among nonracists. He's passive, he should kill every single member of ISIS by magic, etc.
...Except him not doing much to help people who aren't rich, that's otm. People thinking that will change by electing cavemen is where the idiocy comes in.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:18 (ten years ago)
unfortunately otm. for a while i figured the saving grace of the u.s. public these days was its iraq-influenced 'weariness of war,' etc., but looks like even that's fallen by the wayside post-ISIS.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:54 (ten years ago)
unfortunately those beheadings worked like a charm
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:56 (ten years ago)
you can tell me this all a bunch of hindsight bias bs but i never bought into wendy davis
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:57 (ten years ago)
I don't know about hindsight but that's lazy nonsense. Never liked her chances of winning TX this year? Okay fine. But "bought into" what?
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
well that, yeah
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:04 (ten years ago)
I thought her taking the TX governorship was a really (really!) uphill battle, but I like her chances in some other capacity.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:32 (ten years ago)
The thing about Wendy Davis was that she was the most visible (and in turn, viable) Dem gubernatorial candidate we've had here in ages. Previous to her, we had Houston's term-limited out mayor, and before him, a Congressnan who'd been gerrymandered out of his seat by arch-rival Tom Delay. Both fine candidates, but both also kind of boring in their appeal.
Davis had some star power, and perhaps if her move into the national spotlight had been closer to the election (or better still, had all of this happened in a time where we didn't get burned out on stuff because of 24 hr news etc.), she may gave stood a better chance. But she didn't keep and hold her momentum.
But the biggest problem of all is THE MAJORITY OF TEXANS DON'T FUCKING VOTE. Abbott beat Davis by a 3:2 margin (with only 1 out of three registered voters actually voting), par for the course in a governor's race in the Rick Perry-era...and this was with a recognized candidate running on a hotter than normal platform! Until the stalwart Republican base begins to errode (IF it does), the song shall remain the same.
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:38 (ten years ago)
heard rick perry's going away speech on npr this morning and wanted to kill myself
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:53 (ten years ago)
But they were fine with those aspects of O in 2012 (or at least saw him as the better alternative). People stayed home in the same numbers as 2010, so while that might be part of it, there's got to be other reasons as well for the lower midterm turnout.Like why couldn't Debbie W. Schultz have made instagram selfie photos at voting locations a thing...― curmudgeon, Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:13 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:13 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well also remember obama didnt really capaign on ANYTHING in 2012 other than 'I am not a republican' - no agenda, no nothing.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 18:54 (ten years ago)
kinda feel like if yr constituents can't be bothered to vote more than once every four years you probably don't deserve to be in charge
― Mordy, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:02 (ten years ago)
that is how voting works yes
very smallest of silver linings: we could see the end of the filibuster pretty soon!
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:11 (ten years ago)
I don't know anyone locally (Austin) who voted for Wendy Davis that expected her to win. Everybody knew she had no chance unless Greg Abbott committed a major gaffe.
It was very illustrative seeing FB updates from liberal "principled" non-voters in my feed followed up with comments by their parents saying that they DID vote, and they voted for Abbott and Patrick. Enjoy your clean hands I guess, you dumb fucks.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:14 (ten years ago)
Cousin Pookie still anomic. xp
Not voting is a choice. If it's made thoughtfully, it should be respected. You don't have to approve.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:16 (ten years ago)
Didn't Texas make it harder for college kids and others to vote (not that voter id laws explain why many or most did not vote)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:18 (ten years ago)
It's pretty clear that I don't approve, I think.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:18 (ten years ago)
Yeah, they now require photo ID in Texas when you vote, and a student ID is not one of the approved forms of said ID. But that kind of law is targeting minorities and the poor. You don't need to disenfranchise college students, they are self-disenfranchising.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:20 (ten years ago)
You do if they're Democrats!
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:21 (ten years ago)
Minimum wage increases passed by initiative in Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska as well.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
They are Democrats, mostly. But since they already don't vote, there's no need to waste resources targeting them with voter ID laws.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:33 (ten years ago)
Every statewide GOP candidate won in Arkansas and every county passed the minimum wage hike.
Those are the poor uneducated white folk Hillary's going to do so well with again.
― pplains, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
Issue campaigns are different than candidate campaigns, I think that's an important distinction. But yeah.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:37 (ten years ago)
x-post re Texas college kids ---But they voted more last time, so that's why they were targeted.
In 2012 they represented 19 percent of the electorate but this year they represented only 13 percent, almost identical to their lackluster performance in 2010.
If most older white guys weren't so enamored with trickle-down economics and voting Republican there would be less need to worry about college kid voting. Check out the breakdown in that NY Times link upthread based on gender, religion, race, etc.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:41 (ten years ago)
Don't govern, sez National Review.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:47 (ten years ago)
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, November 5, 2014 2:41 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
hard to say if this is the voter ID effect or just what is to be expected of midterm vs presidential turnout
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 19:51 (ten years ago)
going macro, ie elections are not where the ship gets steered
The American republic didn’t end this week because conservative Republicans captured the Senate. Conservative Republicans captured the Senate because the republic has been ending, as liberal Democrats and libertarian Republicans surf four predatory new asymmetries in our national life – in security, in speech, in investment and in consumer marketing. These immense imbalances of power are submerging the elections, delegitimizing the liberal capitalist republic that promised to give security, speech, investment and marketing deeply different meanings and consequences than the ones they’ve acquired.
Nothing less than a transformation of American citizenship worthy of Nathan Hale, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Vaclav Havel and, yes, Edward Snowden can free us from yet another spectacle of politicians who look like pinheads dancing on pins’ heads....
http://www.salon.com/2014/11/05/we_have_been_stupefied_how_republicans_subvert_democracy_and_the_democrats_sorry_dereliction/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:13 (ten years ago)
get ready wisconsin!
https://twitter.com/sbauerAP/status/530095406689304576
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
guys are you ready to get excited about some corporate tax cuts?????
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 21:39 (ten years ago)
Get ready for the Quintuple Irish
― Nhex, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 21:40 (ten years ago)
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:08 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
It's almost as if you really believe American voters make distinctions remotely that fine.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 22:03 (ten years ago)
Im just projecting but my quasi thesis is candidate obama seemed like he had some ideas and some balls and president obama just makes baby jesus cry
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 22:58 (ten years ago)
baby jesus killed in a drone strike iirc
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:01 (ten years ago)
Meet Chaps:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/meet-dr-chaps-gordon-klingenschmitt-colorados-new-anti-gay-demon-hunting-state-legislator
― Deliciously hard yet very accessible (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:04 (ten years ago)
― benbbag, Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:03 PM (55 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
generalized base disappointment with their party's leader can't have helped the turnout slump.
in both elite/wonk terms (anger over foreign policy, surveillance, etc.) and bread and butter terms (a "recovery" that has not benefited working-class or PoC, who have lost most after '08, much if at all) you are looking at an unenthused set of voters
keeping dem blocs excited or even just engaged and aware in off-years (or downticket! christ) is obviously the holy grail and nobody seems to have any bright ideas there.
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:05 (ten years ago)
best shit they could come up with was minimum wage stuff and they obviously did a shitty ass job linking that to dem candidates
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:37 (ten years ago)
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/11/saira-blair-west-virgnias-teenage-lawmaker-interview.html
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:38 (ten years ago)
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:58 PM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The people who think this way, rightly or wrongly, are informed and fairly reliable Democratic voters.
The people who are unreliable Democratic voters are voting for "change" without any good idea what "change" means or who is going to do what with their vote.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:39 (ten years ago)
― caucasity and the sundance kid (goole), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 6:05 PM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
There are no bright ideas to have at a policy level. These people are voting for (or against) personalities. The "turn out for what" shit is actually sort of on the right track, but really a drop in the bucket.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:40 (ten years ago)
xxxp i know a lot of activist types as well as academic ineffectual-activist types and a very large proportion of them only ever seem to turn up the volume on, like, social injustice and environmental consumerism. it's rare to hear them speak up about work or wages (which many of them have pretty locked down, themselves).
― j., Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:41 (ten years ago)
Digby points out that four unabashed progressives in states not reliably progressive until recently won w/out a problem: Franken, Udall, Schatz, and Merkley. Then there are the minimum wage ballot initiatives that passed in states in Nebraska. Now the Chuck Todd view races like, say, the Colorado one as a repudiation of a Democratic fetish for 'women's issues.'
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:47 (ten years ago)
Daily IntelligencermillenialsNovember 5, 2014 4:35 p.m.Meet Saira Blair, West Virginia’s Very Conservative New 18-Year-Old LawmakerBy Katie Zavadski Follow @katiezavadski49 SharesShare 23 Tweet 26 Share 0 Share 0 Email PrintPhoto: Saira Blair/InstagramSaira Blair's victory over a grown woman in a local West Virginia House of Delegates race last night doesn't mean she gets to skip school. "Saira is in class right now," a rep told Intelligencer this morning when we requested an interview with the state's youngest lawmaker ever.Blair, who is 18, beat a two-term incumbent in the Republican primary for West Virginia's 59th district in May, when she was just 17 years old and too young to even cast a vote for herself. (She turned 18 over the summer.) This fall, she took on her freshman year at West Virginia University and, also, her real race against local litigator Layne Diehl.Once she finished school, the soft-spoken teenager took some time after her easy win last night — she got 63 percent of the vote in a three-way race — to tell us about her politics and what the future may hold.Hey, Saira! Congrats on your big win last night. How did that feel?Good. It’s good, a sigh of relief. Just that, you know, after almost two years of working toward it, Election Day is here and past, and now I can start working towards bringing a better state to the people of West Virginia.And I hear you were back in class this morning?It was the same as any other day, just waking up and going to class. I want to make sure I can balance the two. I have to keep my grades up — there was no time to rest.Were you expecting a victory?Um, no … I mean, I think that I gave myself as good a chance as any other candidate; I worked really hard and gave it my all. I kind of considered, whether I win or lose, I gave it my best and waited for the results.Obviously, the thing people are talking about most is how incredibly young you are. How do you think this will shape you as a lawmaker?I think my age allows me to bring a fresh perspective, but I don’t want it to become the main focus, because my job is taking the views of the Eastern Panhandle to Charleston. And I feel like I’m going to do that, and that would be my main goal no matter what my age: to represent the people of Morgan. My age allows me to go in without bias and to represent their views as fairly as possible.You talk a lot about jobs. Why is this such an important issue to you?Jobs hits me close to home because I’ve watched many students close to my age get their high school and college diplomas in West Virginia, but then leave because they can’t get jobs. Our population has been the same since the '80s and soon it's going to be the only state declining. It's hard, because I want to stay in West Virginia and raise my family here, but the job market just doesn’t exist right now.And now you have a job as a member of the House of Delegates. Have you held any other jobs?I’ve worked for my parents' apple orchard as well as their water softener company for years. That’s actually how I raised the money for my campaign when I first decided to run: I put in $3,600 because I wanted to show people that I had skin in the game.Your dad is a state senator. What kind of influence has he had on your political career?He’s been one of my biggest role models. I’ve shadowed him for years, attended events, and developed a lot of my views around the ones I've seen him hold. We don’t agree on everything, but he has made a big impact on why I decided to run.What are some of the issues you disagree on?One is that we're both pro-life, but I do not support Plan B contraception, whereas he does. And there’s just smaller issues that will probably come up as we begin serving together in January.
Saira Blair's victory over a grown woman in a local West Virginia House of Delegates race last night doesn't mean she gets to skip school. "Saira is in class right now," a rep told Intelligencer this morning when we requested an interview with the state's youngest lawmaker ever.
Blair, who is 18, beat a two-term incumbent in the Republican primary for West Virginia's 59th district in May, when she was just 17 years old and too young to even cast a vote for herself. (She turned 18 over the summer.) This fall, she took on her freshman year at West Virginia University and, also, her real race against local litigator Layne Diehl.
Once she finished school, the soft-spoken teenager took some time after her easy win last night — she got 63 percent of the vote in a three-way race — to tell us about her politics and what the future may hold.
Hey, Saira! Congrats on your big win last night. How did that feel?Good. It’s good, a sigh of relief. Just that, you know, after almost two years of working toward it, Election Day is here and past, and now I can start working towards bringing a better state to the people of West Virginia.
And I hear you were back in class this morning?It was the same as any other day, just waking up and going to class. I want to make sure I can balance the two. I have to keep my grades up — there was no time to rest.
Were you expecting a victory?Um, no … I mean, I think that I gave myself as good a chance as any other candidate; I worked really hard and gave it my all. I kind of considered, whether I win or lose, I gave it my best and waited for the results.
Obviously, the thing people are talking about most is how incredibly young you are. How do you think this will shape you as a lawmaker?I think my age allows me to bring a fresh perspective, but I don’t want it to become the main focus, because my job is taking the views of the Eastern Panhandle to Charleston. And I feel like I’m going to do that, and that would be my main goal no matter what my age: to represent the people of Morgan. My age allows me to go in without bias and to represent their views as fairly as possible.
You talk a lot about jobs. Why is this such an important issue to you?Jobs hits me close to home because I’ve watched many students close to my age get their high school and college diplomas in West Virginia, but then leave because they can’t get jobs. Our population has been the same since the '80s and soon it's going to be the only state declining. It's hard, because I want to stay in West Virginia and raise my family here, but the job market just doesn’t exist right now.
And now you have a job as a member of the House of Delegates. Have you held any other jobs?I’ve worked for my parents' apple orchard as well as their water softener company for years. That’s actually how I raised the money for my campaign when I first decided to run: I put in $3,600 because I wanted to show people that I had skin in the game.
Your dad is a state senator. What kind of influence has he had on your political career?He’s been one of my biggest role models. I’ve shadowed him for years, attended events, and developed a lot of my views around the ones I've seen him hold. We don’t agree on everything, but he has made a big impact on why I decided to run.
What are some of the issues you disagree on?One is that we're both pro-life, but I do not support Plan B contraception, whereas he does. And there’s just smaller issues that will probably come up as we begin serving together in January.
― how's life, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:47 (ten years ago)
Oh, that copied the whole damned thing for some reason. What I meant to highlight:
Your dad is a state senator. What kind of influence has he had on your political career?He’s been one of my biggest role models. I’ve shadowed him for years, attended events, and developed a lot of my views around the ones I've seen him hold. We don’t agree on everything, but he has made a big impact on why I decided to run.What are some of the issues you disagree on?One is that we're both pro-life, but I do not support Plan B contraception, whereas he does. And there’s just smaller issues that will probably come up as we begin serving together in January.
― how's life, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:48 (ten years ago)
she'll support the shit out of it once she gets knocked up
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:54 (ten years ago)
Digby points out that four unabashed progressives in states not reliably progressive until recently won w/out a problem: Franken, Udall, Schatz, and Merkley.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 6:47 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I'm sorry, did you just call Minnesota "not reliably progressive until recently"?
Never mind, however; those are all amongst the solid blue states in which Dems ran the table (except for the one with the longstanding GOP incumbent in which they didn't really bother), along with Michigan, New Jersey, and more, just like Republicans ran the table in the red states, and the parties split the purple states. This was not a wave election.
― benbbag, Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:05 (ten years ago)
Oregon was the state of Packwood and Hatfield until recently, and Domenici ruled New Mexico for decades.
The point is that progressivism works when it's not diluted.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:14 (ten years ago)
merkley campaigns as a moderate fwiw. most of his commercials were about how he's a good dad.
― Clay, Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:21 (ten years ago)
is he?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:22 (ten years ago)
The liberal Credo superpac is asserting in email:
Party committees and candidate campaigns wasted hundreds of millions of dollars on ineffective negative television advertising. If this money had been invested in voter mobilization on the ground instead, Democrats would not have lost the Senate.
They want lots of old-school door knocking
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:50 (ten years ago)
I think its a little more complex than that
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 5, 2014 7:14 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
And Montana was the state of Baucus and Schweitzer (either of whom might have won if they'd run), and still is that of Tester and what's his name in the state house, just as Harkin held sway for decades in Iowa, Rockefeller in West Virginia, and Johnson for a shorter period in South Dakota. Etc. etc. etc.
The fact is that once you elect someone more than once in a state, especially a small and/or Western one in which the herd is more likely to get followed, they tend to hold on for a long time. You are overestimating the salience of ideological orientation and underestimating that of name recognition and other aspects of personality.
― benbbag, Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:18 (ten years ago)
And "you" can mean pretty much anyone.
― benbbag, Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:20 (ten years ago)
I mean, if it's ideology that matters, why did both very left Harkin and very right Grassley keep getting elected in Iowa? They got elected because enough people who don't bother thinking about what people vote for and what it all means said that [Harkin/Grassley], he's ok, we know him, he's one of us.
― benbbag, Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:21 (ten years ago)
It's not a binary! Name recognition does a lot to palliate ideological orientation, as I saw in my own district pre-census when Ileana Ros-Lehtinen for a number of practical reasons was the most socially lib rep to caucus with the GOP. Besides, these guys didn't always have name recognition -- they had to get elected on a platform.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:28 (ten years ago)
wait a minute
are you gabbneb
merkley didn't win because of any kind of progressive record -- in fact the first senate primary he won back in 08 he was running as v much a dem machine candidate vs the much more progressive insurgent candidate in steve novak -- but because he had a D next to his name. pretty much anyone was taking that race as the democratic candidate by 15 points or so, that's just the demographics in oregon rn.
― Clay, Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:40 (ten years ago)
Lol @ alfred's moment of realization
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:54 (ten years ago)
we are all gabbneb now
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 6 November 2014 02:20 (ten years ago)
in re: merkely's win. he was fortunate in his opponent. the Oregon state republican party has been in a shambles for a couple of decades. they can win rural districts, but have failed to develop viable statewide candidates. they recently ran a complete novice for governor on the strength of his being an ex-Trailblazer player.
in merkeley's case they ran another novice, a woman who was a pediatric brain surgeon, who they thought would maybe pick up some women's votes. she won the primary, but about ten or so days before the primary a local paper ran a story about how her ex-husband had got a court order against her a few years ago, because she was harassing him. the Koch brothers money spigot dried up soon after this and many of the pros on her team walked away. she ran a horrid campaign and looked like a bumbling fool much of the time.
Oregon's republicans are total losers in statewide campaigns. just pitiful, painfully amateur fools.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, 6 November 2014 02:43 (ten years ago)
Several counties in WA voted for both 591 and 594, cementing my belief that voting is essentially random, even if results are normally distributed.
― Spirit of Match Game '76 (silby), Thursday, 6 November 2014 03:33 (ten years ago)
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2014/11/why-did-democrats-do-so-badly-last.html
Wonder if I should read these long lefty blogposts re Dem Party fundraising, campaign strategies, and choices of which candidate to support and how. Digby always links to this guy Howie Klein (who I think used to run a indie punk, synthpop & alt rock label back in the day)
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 November 2014 14:40 (ten years ago)
A post yesterday discusses the ways in which Steve Israel allows Republicans in heavy Democratic districts to basically run unopposed, with particular attention on my former congresswoman (until redistricting) Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 November 2014 14:49 (ten years ago)
curmudgeon's link worth reading if anyone gives a penny to the loathsome EMILY's List.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:18 (ten years ago)
― curmudgeon, Thursday, November 6, 2014 9:40 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Depends on how interested in cataract-level-myopic confirmation bias you are. He starts by positing that his preferred, more ideologically pure Dem's massive loss in a Senate race was the fault of the corrupt party apparatus whose candidate bowed out. It gets less substantive from there.
― benbbag, Thursday, 6 November 2014 16:15 (ten years ago)
Do you agree with any of his criticism of the apparatus? I know that Digby is often critical of the means by which certain Dem candidates get supported and not others; and how decisions are made in trying to get folks to run in certain areas.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 November 2014 16:25 (ten years ago)
on Al From, the DLC and the birth of the high-finance technocrat Dems
https://medium.com/@matthewstoller/its-al-froms-democratic-party-we-just-live-here-5d0de7f89c3e
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 November 2014 16:33 (ten years ago)
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/steve-israel-leaving-dccc-112632.html
Which House Dem will now get this job
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:20 (ten years ago)
they should put bill daley in charge. democrats aren't too stuck up to fight dirty. they just need to move to the center
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 7 November 2014 02:53 (ten years ago)
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 November 2014 16:42 (ten years ago)
Oh Michael Gerson, former Bush speechwriter
To be a national party, Democrats need to contend for rural and small-town voters, for older voters, for working-class white voters, for white Catholics, even for suburban evangelicals. This requires not just a populist economic message (which is important) but the recognition of a set of values — a predisposition toward social order, family and faith — that is foreign to most liberal bloggers and Democratic strategists.
Those heathen lib bloggers,
earlier in the piece when talking about Obama he said:
Obama clearly regards the “two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday” as a more favorable audience than the discontented third who turned out.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-gerson-obamas-gifts-to-the-nation-and-the-democrats/2014/11/06/a1c75bf4-65fa-11e4-836c-83bc4f26eb67_story.html?tid=pm_opinions_pop
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 November 2014 17:27 (ten years ago)
Gershon sounds like a marketing executive explaining why the toothpaste packaging needs to be redesigned, not like a person with a sincere personal interest in social order, family and faith.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Friday, 7 November 2014 18:23 (ten years ago)
obama needs to be cowed by the tyranny of the minority
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 7 November 2014 18:45 (ten years ago)
1500 more troops to Iraq, eh? Obama approves the Keystone pipeline by next Tuesday i guess.
fuck this country
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 8 November 2014 05:37 (ten years ago)
don't let the perfect be the enemy of the possible activity our wall street/koch industries overlords will allow us to take
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 8 November 2014 12:07 (ten years ago)
Ran some numbers on the new Senate majority (because I will never not be hung-up on the structure of the Senate). Going into this month's elections, Democrats (plus their two Independent caucus friends) represented approximately 182.9 million Americans, to 131.4 million for the Republicans. If the Alaska and Louisiana seats both go to Republicans, as I expect, the new Republican majority will represent about 146.5 million people, to 167.8 for the Democrats. So the Democrats will still represent about 21 million more people than the Republicans -- a number equivalent to the entire combined state populations of Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia.
Not that knowing that helps in any particular way.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 9 November 2014 19:36 (ten years ago)
It helps to know it takes a bunch of idiots to lose to a bunch of idiots.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 9 November 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
palin:
In the 2008 campaign Sen. McCain and I warned, on behalf of every reasonable person, that your willingness to negotiate with terrorists would get Americans killed; that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies. Iran is one of Israel's staunchest enemies. Mr. President, who is advising you to come against Israel? that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 10 November 2014 20:42 (ten years ago)
Mark Udall urged to put the Senate torture report into public record
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/11/10/mike-gravel-senator-put-pentagon-papers-public-record-urges-udall-torture-report/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 10 November 2014 22:19 (ten years ago)
http://eil.com/images/main/Big-Stick-Crack-N-Drag-506185.jpg
― you fuck one chud... (stevie), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 12:21 (ten years ago)
dunno abt this headline but check out the picture
https://twitter.com/Wonkette/status/532024981958688768
― goole, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:09 (ten years ago)
go fuck yourselves:
Senate Democrats may push for a vote on the Keystone XL pipeline in the coming weeks, according to Democratic aides, a move that could help Sen Mary Landrieu (D-LA) in her run-off race against Rep Bill Cassidy (R-LA).
While no decisions have been made to go forward with the plan, the strategy would see a vote on the controversial pipeline before the Republican majority is sworn-in, and would allow Landrieu, and other moderate Democrats, to vote in support of approving it. Republicans, who have supported approval of the pipeline since its inception, have said a vote on its approval would be one of their first priorities in the 114th Congress.
Landrieu is heading into a Dec. 6 run-off with Cassidy with the momentum on the Republican's side. Not only did the majority of Louisianans vote for the two Republican candidates in the general election, but the DSCC announce last week it had pulled its ad buy for Landrieu during the period of the run-off.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/senate-democrats-could-push-keystone-vote-help-mary-landrieu-n246621
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 15:06 (ten years ago)
THAT WON'T WORK.
― pplains, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 15:08 (ten years ago)
I would honestly like to hear what marketing is saying to the Democrats (Morbs, cover yr ears for a sec) about running to the right to defeat the right. Why would any voter want to vote for a Democrat who acts like a Republican over an actual real fire-breathing Republican?
Same thing has happened in some ways in the Northeast - left-leaning Republicans like Lincoln Chaffee get turned away in favor of the real thing. In my state, I've watched both of my Democratic senators get knocked off one-two even though they tried as hard as possible to run to the right. It only alienated real progressive voters and confirmed to the other side that they were on the right track.
Good god, Mark Pryor. A namby-pamby joke of a Democrat who appeared in ads clutching his Bible, who voted against the assault weapons ban, who whenever there was a bill that had "four Democrats voting with the Republican minority" was the first in line for that joker, losing his ASS and looking completely befuddled by the whole experience.
So yeah, I'm real sure that the 56% of the Louisiana electorate and their dead relatives are really going to reverse themselves on Landrieu because she starts voting exactly the same way as her how her opponent has promised to vote. Especially since she's now in the minority and won't be able to do anything cool like chair a committee anymore anyway.
― pplains, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 15:15 (ten years ago)
keystone xl is a thing environmentalists mention a lot but i only have the faintest idea what it is
― example (crüt), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 15:57 (ten years ago)
real progressive voters aren't going add up to 50.1% of the vote in these states
― iatee, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 16:10 (ten years ago)
One could argue these dems want keystone xl in the first place and this is just an excuse
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 16:40 (ten years ago)
Landrieu has always wanted it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 16:49 (ten years ago)
I wish Obama had tackled climate change first instead of healthcare but this is awesome: http://www.sfgate.com/business/energy/article/US-China-climate-deal-aims-to-prod-others-to-act-5887135.php
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
yeah, totally. so nice to wake up to unexpected GOOD news for once!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 17:09 (ten years ago)
India next
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
then we take Berlin.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 17:19 (ten years ago)
Why would any voter want to vote for a Democrat who acts like a Republican over an actual real fire-breathing Republican?
They've been trying this for 20 years, and I'm betting on at least another 20 (before they stop / Armageddon).
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
Doesnt the Senate have to ratify treaties or is this another duty they've totally abdicated to the executive like declaring war..?
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:02 (ten years ago)
McConnell didn't immediately threaten to invalidate, so I assume there's some procedural/technical reason congress can't
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:08 (ten years ago)
I hear that. But I still don't think aping the GOP is going to help any.
I'm waiting to see if someone like Joe Manchin decides to become the Phil Gramm or Ben Nighthorse Campbell of this election and makes the switch.
― pplains, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:05 (ten years ago)
fewer and fewer of those guys to even complain about after every election
― iatee, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:09 (ten years ago)
Senate Republicans, riding high after capturing the majority, said Wednesday that a top priority in 2016 will be defeating Democratic leader Harry Reid.
Well, I can agree with them on something, I guess.
― pplains, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:16 (ten years ago)
yeah I don't have a lot of love left for Reid - I assume the Dems will re-take the Senate in 2016 along with Clinton in the WH, would be funny if Reid got left in the dust during that but I kinda doubt it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:21 (ten years ago)
^I sense this is a clip-and-paste post
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:23 (ten years ago)
What do you think his legacy will be? Certainly he contributed to the Do-Nothing Congress meme by preventing any votes for amendments. But not letting anybody take ANY votes hurt the Dems who lost.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:24 (ten years ago)
Obamacare and the bailout, that's p much it. and it's not like those were his ideas.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
I still can't get over Reid basically saying, "Hey, you know what would solve this horrible immigration law in Arizona? What if everyone had a biometric national ID card?"
― pplains, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 19:55 (ten years ago)
What do you think his legacy will be?
"mitt romney is a tax cheat. i totally heard it from a guy."
― goole, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 20:24 (ten years ago)
btw, deal with China is "not a treaty":
But now the upper ranks of the Republican Party are united in opposition to any mandatory carbon caps, and they have made EPA climate regulations a top target in 2015. The Obama administration, of course, saw all of this coming, which is why you won't see the word "treaty" anywhere in the climate agreements either with China or other nations. The deal does not require Senate ratification, but it is more vulnerable to undoing from Obama's successor, as when President George W. Bush pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol upon taking office in 2001.
so suck it GOP
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 22:25 (ten years ago)
Fox News (I was at the gym!) was spinning this yet another Obama failure since he didn't extract bigger promises from China. The chutzpah - it's limitless...
― schwantz, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 22:57 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/XjbUYi0.gif
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 23:47 (ten years ago)
fingers crossed about this:
Senate Democrats are taking up a bill authorizing the permit as a way to boost the political fortunes of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who is facing a Dec. 6 runoff against Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.); the House is preparing to pass its own bill on the subject Thursday.
Aides say Obama is prepared to veto the bill--exercising a power that he has used only twice before. His argument would be that the State Department has not completed its review of the process, and that the Nebraska Supreme Court has yet to rule on a key part of the pipeline’s route.
O does appear to be giving the finger to the GOP post-election, which is gratifying
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 13 November 2014 18:10 (ten years ago)
#grubergate
― goole, Thursday, 13 November 2014 18:24 (ten years ago)
i'm sure that many of the senate democrats would love vote for keystone. landrieu's doomed and everyone knows it (the democrats' campaign arm has pulled the plug on her funding), so bringing up the vote to "help her" is hilarious. they just want to vote yes on keystone.
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 13 November 2014 18:42 (ten years ago)
looks like O's gonna do the immigration/amnesty thing too good for him, kinda likin post-election idgaf Obama
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 13 November 2014 19:27 (ten years ago)
well it's a slow friday afternoon, which means it's once again time for america's favorite creepy game:
NAME THAT SENATOR USING ONLY THEIR EXTRACTED EYES AND MOUTH!!
http://i.imgur.com/W6uEDF9.jpg
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:22 (ten years ago)
so that's what Mitch looks like without the dewlap.
imagine if the Dems and their leader relaxed immigration and made climate deals w/ China BEFORE elections... my God, they might get killed in the midterms, right?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:25 (ten years ago)
not mcconnell
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:26 (ten years ago)
Either Tammy Baldwin or Lindsey Graham.
― pplains, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:33 (ten years ago)
mary landrieu? '16,000 votes ahead? i will win this run-off!'
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
eyes definitely not beady enough to be McConnell
― anonanon, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
Gillibrand
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
rand no?
― schlump, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:36 (ten years ago)
I am thinking one of the weaselly southern dudes... I'll go with Sessions
― anonanon, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:37 (ten years ago)
all good guesses, but no.
hint: he shares a name with a super mario bros 3 character
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:37 (ten years ago)
ah Senator Lakitu how could I forget
― anonanon, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:38 (ten years ago)
senator toad??
― moz.gov (Clay), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:39 (ten years ago)
The perfect teeth argue for a fairly young congress critter. Fogies like McConnell grew up in an era when dental work was more primitive.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:40 (ten years ago)
the character is a boss that is not bowser
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:40 (ten years ago)
it's Roy Blunt isn't it
― anonanon, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:41 (ten years ago)
Leahy Koopa
― example (crüt), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:41 (ten years ago)
Boom Boom Booker
― example (crüt), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:42 (ten years ago)
ROY BLUNT
http://i.imgur.com/uLQsKQZ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/cfGea2S.jpg
sorry i didn't make the images larger
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:44 (ten years ago)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=What+US+senator+shares+a+name+with+a+Super+Mario+Bros.+3+boss%3F
HUMANS WIN AGAIN
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:46 (ten years ago)
Ron Wyden kinda looks like a goomba from the Mario Bros movie
― anonanon, Friday, 14 November 2014 19:47 (ten years ago)
i don't know if roy koopa counts as a full fledged boss or just a mini-boss
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
― example (crüt), Friday, 14 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
Bill Cassidy was one of the doofiest doofuses I saw during election returns. So he's gonna win this runoff, huh?
― Deliciously hard yet very accessible (Dan Peterson), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:13 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/aterkel/status/533354556600885248
Amanda Terkel @aterkel Orrin Hatch says Republicans will give Democrats a “taste of their own medicine” in the next two years #FedSoc2014
― goole, Friday, 14 November 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
sounds good
― moz.gov (Clay), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:42 (ten years ago)
RIP, Elizabeth Warren, Salon sez: http://www.salon.com/2014/11/14/r_i_p_elizabeth_warren_16_fantasy_why_shes_really_probably_not_running_for_president_now/
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
people really really need to get over this president-as-savior shit
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:45 (ten years ago)
MLK was not waiting on Eisenhower
(or Stevenson, JFK)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:46 (ten years ago)
have you told Orrin Hach?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
ALEC is not waiting on HRC
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:03 (ten years ago)
I have a lot of thoughts about McConnell saying, "We told him, and told him, and told him, and we're telling him again right now..." (not to do anything by exec order). Like he's Obama's step-father or something. Or school principal.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Friday, 14 November 2014 22:21 (ten years ago)
Or master.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 14 November 2014 22:25 (ten years ago)
Yes, that's my other thought about it exactly.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Friday, 14 November 2014 22:27 (ten years ago)
Obama should burn Congress to the ground on his way out the door.
― Dokken played here for a Ribfest and people were total assholes (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 14 November 2014 23:28 (ten years ago)
to the tune of "school's out."
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 14 November 2014 23:33 (ten years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, November 14, 2014 3:43 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Uh, Warren was never running, or going to run, for President. She's a pretty accidental elective politician in the first place.
― benbbag, Saturday, 15 November 2014 01:33 (ten years ago)
Like he's Obama's step-father or something. Or school principal.
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Friday, November 14, 2014 5:21 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You mean like just about all other rhetoric about this President (whose title is often dropped for the raw exoticized last name), including from a good number of Democrats and purportedly objective news mediators?
― benbbag, Saturday, 15 November 2014 01:38 (ten years ago)
― benbbag
write Salon a letter.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 15 November 2014 01:44 (ten years ago)
Easier if they were a Pakistani wedding party, he's good with those.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 November 2014 04:02 (ten years ago)
I can see the Republican 'surge' has sent you all back into his underdog arms
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 November 2014 04:03 (ten years ago)
I almost thought to preface that post with "Although he's a known War Criminal, _________"
― Dokken played here for a Ribfest and people were total assholes (Sparkle Motion), Saturday, 15 November 2014 06:20 (ten years ago)
Elizabeth Warren's name is on many of the Dem fundbegging emails that go to my junk folder, so she appears to be a party loyalist of no particular importance.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 November 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
You appear to have erred in conclusion-drawing.
― benbbag, Saturday, 15 November 2014 17:26 (ten years ago)
Dr Morbius would be an inspiring US senator in his own inimitable way, standing out there raging endlessly against the dying of the light, but he wouldn't be able to get a single bill passed. He'd be a proud army of one.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Saturday, 15 November 2014 18:21 (ten years ago)
Eh he's got my vote
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 15 November 2014 18:52 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 16:31 (ten years ago)
"gees we've done everything conceivable to antagonize him, why won't he play nice?"
― Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
Shakey, you're my defense secretary. Don't betray me like Robert Gates.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 November 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
That's some American exceptionalism right here...
And instead of starting work on tax legislation that would be politically and substantively challenging under the best circumstances, Republicans are threatening another bitter partisan showdown that risks shutting down the government.
We could do this hard thing or we can do nothing and fight for the next two years
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 17 November 2014 16:48 (ten years ago)
fwiw i am pleased with O's hardmanning on immigration changes (barring 11th-hour bit spitting) and the China climate agreement; I figured he would always function best in an environment without elections.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 November 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
dreading that miserable feeling when senate republicans vote to raise the debt limit and then almost no one calls them out on their blatant hypocrisy
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:03 (ten years ago)
http://www.bradblog.com/Images/ChuckTodd_MeetThePress_cup.jpg
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:05 (ten years ago)
did Mike Meyers get a new job
― Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:06 (ten years ago)
er Jimmy Fallon I mean
bah
also fuck the washington post for their tone when reporting stuff like this.
"After eight years in the minority, Senate Republicans suddenly find themselves with primary responsibility for solving both problems, which are likely to require uncomfortable votes to raise revenue and to authorize an increase in the nearly $18 trillion federal debt. A broad package to cut the corporate tax rate could help ease that pain."
the only hint at the hypocrisy of senate republicans is that the votes will likely be "uncomfortable". i guess they assume that everyone will read between the lines and understand some of the background behind the story, but the vast majority of people who don't follow such matters very closely may not know that the debt limit votes will be "uncomfortable" because ONE YEAR AGO republicans shut down the whole fucking government because they didn't want to raise the debt ceiling/AKA pay the government's debts that they had previously voted to authorize!
but they pretty much get a free pass on that shit when the reporters cover the horserace. the vote may be "uncomfortable" for them but it won't be the legendary summer of public humiliation that they deserve
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:12 (ten years ago)
you don't expect the American public to remember anything do you
― Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, November 17, 2014 11:06 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Both posts OTM, btw.
― pplains, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:24 (ten years ago)
Tom Green would have also been acceptable.
― pplains, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:25 (ten years ago)
xp yeah but where's the liberal media now??
― Nhex, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
no of course not! hell, i barely remember 2013! it was a hell of a year
it would just be nice if LAMESTREAM MEDIA would add something like "the vote to raise the debt ceiling will be uncomfortable for republicans because it will directly contradict their position just one year ago when they shut down the federal government over the issue or whatever
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 17 November 2014 17:33 (ten years ago)
"things are different now" blah blah blah etc
― Οὖτις, Monday, 17 November 2014 17:34 (ten years ago)
(liberal) lawyer jonathan turley takes up the house's case against obama
http://jonathanturley.org/2014/11/17/the-house-hires-turley-as-lead-counsel-in-constitutional-challenge/
As many on this blog know, I support national health care and voted for President Obama in his first presidential campaign. However, as I have often stressed before Congress, in the Madisonian system it is as important how you do something as what you do. And, the Executive is barred from usurping the Legislative Branch’s Article I powers, no matter how politically attractive or expedient it is to do so. Unilateral, unchecked Executive action is precisely the danger that the Framers sought to avoid in our constitutional system. This case represents a long-overdue effort by Congress to resolve fundamental Separation of Powers issues. In that sense, it has more to do with constitutional law than health care law. Without judicial review of unconstitutional actions by the Executive, the trend toward a dominant presidential model of government will continue in this country in direct conflict with the original design and guarantees of our Constitution. Our constitutional system as a whole (as well as our political system) would benefit greatly by courts reinforcing the lines of separation between the respective branches.
― goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 17:59 (ten years ago)
wouldn't James Madison tell the Madisonian system to fuck itself
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
it has more to do with constitutional law than health care law.
Let's see. The Congress duly passed the ACA and passed it on for the signature of the president, at which point it became law. Parts of this law were challenged in federal court as unconstitutional and the SCOTUS reviewed these cases and ruled in favor of the ACA in almost every case. The Congress may, at any time, write and pass a bill that would amend the ACA, provided the votes could be obtained for passage.
I'm not aware of what separation of powers issues this law suit is supposed to address that haven't been addressed already or couldn't be addressed by other more conventional means.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:10 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, November 17, 2014 12:06 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Had same thought. Is it the angle? The unusually-alert eyes?
― benbbag, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:41 (ten years ago)
No wait, it's the mouth.
― benbbag, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:42 (ten years ago)
Turley is such an attention whore
― benbbag, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:44 (ten years ago)
I presume he'll be paid, too.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 18:45 (ten years ago)
good news if you hate republicans. from the 'houston chronicle' no less
http://blog.chron.com/goplifer/2014/11/the-missing-story-of-the-2014-election/
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 21:49 (ten years ago)
Eventually Democrats will help people get the documentation they need to meet the ridiculous and confusing new requirements.
I'll sit here and wait.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 21:54 (ten years ago)
political polarization is happening everywhere, showing up differently depending on the voting/representation system
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2526837
― goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 21:55 (ten years ago)
In Congress, there are no more white Democrats from the South. The long flight of the Dixiecrats has concluded.
Well now there's a bold statement.
http://i.imgur.com/Wno5JzJ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/C6SuUVQ.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/nDtXL6Y.jpg
etc.
― pplains, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:19 (ten years ago)
who are these misshapen men
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:29 (ten years ago)
looks like a casting call for Twin Peaks II
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:31 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:34 (ten years ago)
this cannot be real
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:38 (ten years ago)
he is composed of several small children stuffed inside a suit with a gopher stuck on top
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 22:42 (ten years ago)
hahahahaha
― Pict in a blanket (WilliamC), Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:08 (ten years ago)
haha FUCK YOU LANDRIEU:http://news.yahoo.com/senate-democrats-reject-bill-build-oil-pipeline-232744939--politics.html
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:35 (ten years ago)
haha, well I'll give you that there's definitely one less white Democrat down there.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:31 (ten years ago)
OK, and I have to make an apology.
This is Rep. GK Butterfield, D-N.C. He is an African American.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:35 (ten years ago)
Butterfield was born and raised in a prominent African-American family in Wilson, North Carolina, the son of Addie Lourine (née Davis) and George Kenneth Butterfield, both of mixed race.[2] Butterfield's father immigrated to the United States from Bermuda.[3]
Described by the Washington Post as an "African-American who appears to be white,"[4] Butterfield acknowledges he has European as well as African ancestry, and that he identifies as African American. He has noted that he grew up on the "black side" of town and led civil rights marches.[5] He is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:37 (ten years ago)
Aaaand, this is his daughter.
http://i.imgur.com/Z2cLDV1.jpg
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:37 (ten years ago)
Nice.
― Nhex, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:38 (ten years ago)
Married to an Indianapolis Pacer.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:43 (ten years ago)
The daughter, not GK.
VA isn't the South anymore. The part that (re-)elected Warner, at least. He's the Senator from Fairfax County.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 01:03 (ten years ago)
It is a former Confederate state, and that Houston Chron article was all hat and no cattle.
I mean, I overlooked the obvious white Democrats in Tennessee and Florida.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:41 (ten years ago)
Again, we have the land vs. population issue. Virginia is a former Confederate state (with a cultural heritage in its coastal region that is distinct from much of that of the rest of the South, appalachian or otherwise) just like America is a former agricultural republic. While Virginia has more than doubled in population since 1950, the suburban DC metro population has exploded during that same period, with Warner's home base of Fairfax County now ten times as populous as it was in 1950 (and vastly more diverse - 1/3 Asian or Latino).
― benbbag, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 05:41 (ten years ago)
Virginia is still the south, btw.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 05:53 (ten years ago)
Not in political terms. While the majority of its land may be part of the historical South, the majority of its residents are no longer cultural Southerners (to the extent they ever were). It's like Florida but even moreso.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 06:04 (ten years ago)
But when you say things like "no white Democrats from the South in Congress," you might want to put a * on there, maybe even a ** or †.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:31 (ten years ago)
Lol "cultural southerners". Culture is not static. Geography is.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 15:36 (ten years ago)
If you meant "there's no crazy white male racists from this particular area" in the Democratic caucus anymore, just say that no need for all this stupid coded language.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
"No white Democrats in Congress from the South"____________________________________________________
*Excludes slave states that remained neutral, states that were territories in 1865, any portion of Florida south of the panhandle, Washington D.C. suburbs and Chapel Hill, N.C. (Go Heels!)
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 15:58 (ten years ago)
Actually, that isn't what I mean. Cultural Southerners (that's an umbrella category) is in fact what I mean, and while culture isn't "static" - I don't know what that would mean - historic culture has impacts down generations.
― benbbag, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
― benbbag, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:00 (ten years ago)
whew you saved me from posting a photo of Wasserman-Schulz
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:01 (ten years ago)
maybe he could have included the * but it's not-not a thing - southern blue dawg democrats have been wiped out of national politics over the last generation
― iatee, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:07 (ten years ago)
eh good riddance
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:28 (ten years ago)
Charles Pierce:
So I watched in barely concealed glee on Tuesday evening as the Mary Landrieu Preservation Act of 2014 sank to the bottom of the oily muck in which it belongs. Give ol' Dead Career Walking her due, though. She went down in a towering blaze of pure bullshit. She cited the "40,000 jobs," which, once again, is accurate only if you count temporary workers and itinerant strippers. She made the case that the poisonous tar sands goop that will ride the death-funnel through the Great Plains is somehow not sufficiently different from other carbon fuels to warrant greater caution. (Bill McKibben just had a stroke.) She pointed out that the goop is going to be produced anyway, and that pipelines are safer than trains when it comes to transporting the goop. (This is the only thing she had that resembled a point, although Landrieu would carry the stuff in buckets from Alberta to Port Arthur if it meant 150 votes.) She tried to pitch the death-funnel as a boon to the embattled middle-class and not, as it truly is, as a way for a foreign country to make billions while swiping the land out from under middle-class farmers in Nebraska. And she insisted that TransCanada's oil would be refined exclusively for sale in American markets, which is transcendental hogwash....
....I have no sympathy for Landrieu. She carried the ball for the greediest and most treacherous industry in the world for her entire career. She tried to save herself by selling out the party, the environmental movement, and the planet by pitching a project that doesn't have fk-all to do with Louisiana. Some people showed up at her house and yelled on Monday? Tough. That's life in the used-car business. She will be well taken care of by the people to whom she demonstrated her true allegiance on Tuesday. And that wasn't us.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:36 (ten years ago)
amen!
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
it's funny how even veteran politicians can subscribe to this magical thinking about how voters work, like you press the keystone button and boom 10% of the electorate changes their mind and you win
― iatee, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
Some people showed up at her house and yelled on Monday? Tough. That's life in the used-car business.
a good friend of mine was one of those people who showed up at her house on Monday. :D
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 17:12 (ten years ago)
landrieu is a terrible person.
shout out to the itinerant strippers
― goole, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 18:00 (ten years ago)
fwiw, "dixiecrat" is a more specific term of art than "southern democrat" and refers to the white supremacist wing of the FDR coalition, as initially defined by the spinoff presidential campaign of Strom Thurmond in 1948.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 18:15 (ten years ago)
Here were the quotes from the story that I was tut-tutting:
- Almost half of the Republican Congressional delegation now comes from the former Confederacy. Total coincidence, just pointing that out.
- In Congress, there are no more white Democrats from the South. The long flight of the Dixiecrats has concluded.
― pplains, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 18:26 (ten years ago)
The author was using the terms as if they were interchangeable, but they aren't. tbf, a Venn diagram of white southern democratic congressional representatives from 1968 and white supremacist southern democratic congressional representatives would have showed plenty of overlap.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 18:44 (ten years ago)
shout out to the itinerant strippers― goole, Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:00 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― goole, Wednesday, November 19, 2014 6:00 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
pretty sure they'd much rather ply their trade in new orleans than fucking north dakota
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
There ARE limits to our lameduck rogue president's immigration fixes, of course:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/19/obamas-order-wont-extend-obamacare-to-undocumented-immigrants/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 20:47 (ten years ago)
not only is he going to let all these immigrants in, but they don't even have to have obamacare? unfair!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
another log for the separation of powers lawsuit fire
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 21:08 (ten years ago)
Story on that executive order: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/19/your-complete-guide-to-obamas-immigration-order/?hpid=z1
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 22:08 (ten years ago)
just realized this morning that in January, of the two senators from my state, Chuck Grassley will be the one who best represents my interests
hoooo boy
― jenny holzer, ilxor (mh), Thursday, 20 November 2014 15:07 (ten years ago)
Trade him for John Boozman.
― pplains, Thursday, 20 November 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
L-R: My new senator, me
http://i.imgur.com/XYkMWav.gif
"YOU are a DUMB fuck."
― pplains, Thursday, 20 November 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
John Boozman or Joni Ernst, hard pick!
― jenny holzer, ilxor (mh), Thursday, 20 November 2014 15:32 (ten years ago)
i couldn't figure out where to post this but i liked it:http://pando.com/2014/11/20/the-war-nerd-why-sherman-was-right-to-burn-atlanta/
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 November 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
war nerd otm
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, 20 November 2014 19:37 (ten years ago)
damn right
in a better world every worthless statue of robert e lee would be knocked to the ground and replaced with one of william fuckin' sherman
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 20 November 2014 19:53 (ten years ago)
Networks apparently not airing POTUS 15-min immigration address tnite, huh
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:06 (ten years ago)
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:37 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― example (crüt), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
wtf @ this:
Television network officials say they consider a number of factors when determining whether to interrupt lucrative prime time programming for a presidential address. One factor is whether the speech is "political" in nature (but of course, that's somewhat subjective).Some television executives said privately on Wednesday that they perceived Obama's planned address to be more overtly political than Bush's address on immigration in 2006.
Some television executives said privately on Wednesday that they perceived Obama's planned address to be more overtly political than Bush's address on immigration in 2006.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
oh those apolitical presidential addresses!
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
apparently some presidents are more political than others
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:16 (ten years ago)
why does obama have to keep being so POLITICAL?
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
god i miss reagan
i miss the socialist Jews who usta run TV
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
reading Matthew Josephson's otherwise magnificent The Politicos I have to remind myself often that because The Money Power + GOP colluded from the Civil War to the present day that Andrew Johnson was a dupe, maladroit and rude perhaps, but someone who thought the South didn't deserve punitive measures. The status of the freedmen doesn't concern Josephson at all. Because the Radical Republicans represented Big Money, their motives are suspect. For a Marxist like Josephson this undialectic thinking is a bummer.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
ha, that Sherman article was harsh and great
― Nhex, Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:35 (ten years ago)
The White House is fiercely resisting the release of an executive summary of a 6,300-page Senate report on the CIA's detention and interrogation program, Senate aides tell Foreign Policy, raising fears that the public will never receive a full accounting of the Bush administration's post-9/11 torture practices....
"The White House is continuing to put up fierce resistance to the release of the report," said one knowledgeable Senate aide. "Ideally, we should be closing ground and finalizing the last stages right now so that we can release the report post-Thanksgiving. But, despite the fact that the committee has drastically reduced the number of pseudonyms in the report, the White House is still resisting and dragging this out."
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/11/19/white_house_putting_up_fierce_fight_to_conceal_torture_report
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:42 (ten years ago)
I was just reading that.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 November 2014 20:44 (ten years ago)
looks like we'll just have to wait until the next congress. i'm sure the new GOP majority will really want to take a good look at the report and probably suggest that they go back to the drawing board for another 5 years or so before it's suitable for release..
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 20 November 2014 21:05 (ten years ago)
some presidents are more political than others
Favorite Smiths track
― Free Me's Electric Trumpet (Moodles), Thursday, 20 November 2014 22:03 (ten years ago)
Not to belabor the obvious, but the torture policy was initiated and zealously pursued under the most recent Republican administration. Why would congressional Republicans want to drag those skeletons into plain sight?
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, 20 November 2014 22:47 (ten years ago)
they won't - there's some speculation that the reason the obama administration is endlessly delaying it is so that the GOP congress will arrive and then promptly help them suppress it
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 20 November 2014 22:48 (ten years ago)
Anybody else getting ready to watch Obama's impeachable crime against America? Or you all getting ready for the riots? I can't decide!!!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 21 November 2014 00:56 (ten years ago)
Did this already happen?
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 21 November 2014 01:33 (ten years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/20/politics/obama-immigration-speech/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 21 November 2014 01:39 (ten years ago)
always surprised at how little interest there seems to be in immigration politics on ilx compared to say, israel or the ongoing drone war
― the late great, Friday, 21 November 2014 01:46 (ten years ago)
Prez to Congress: "Pass a bill, bitches."
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 21 November 2014 01:49 (ten years ago)
And on and on and on:
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/24/unblinking-stare
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 21 November 2014 02:51 (ten years ago)
Really hope udall reads the damn torture report into the congressional record
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 21 November 2014 03:16 (ten years ago)
hey guys guess what
― Οὖτις, Friday, 21 November 2014 23:32 (ten years ago)
^ arrives just in time for the impeachment, too
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Friday, 21 November 2014 23:37 (ten years ago)
That Benghazi report is the ultimate Friday news dump.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 22 November 2014 03:45 (ten years ago)
I thought bad news was reserved for Friday news dumps, not.. non-news? what would you even call this
― Nhex, Saturday, 22 November 2014 03:52 (ten years ago)
It's bad news from the House GOP standpoint. So they're guaranteeing it gets the least coverage possible.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 22 November 2014 04:50 (ten years ago)
looming for immigration thread, is there one? here's the relevant s-comm memo:
http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/14_1120_memo_secure_communities.pdf
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 22 November 2014 11:12 (ten years ago)
looKing
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/23/magazine/chris-christie-is-back.html
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 24 November 2014 03:03 (ten years ago)
he's baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-ack
― RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 24 November 2014 03:08 (ten years ago)
Hagel has quit.
― akm, Monday, 24 November 2014 15:28 (ten years ago)
Hagel has quit been fired.
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 24 November 2014 15:33 (ten years ago)
But Mr. Hagel’s aides had maintained in recent weeks that he expected to serve the full four years as defense secretary. His removal appears to be an effort by the White House to show that it is sensitive to critics who have pointed to stumbles in the government’s early response to several national security issues, including the Ebola crisis and the threat posed by the Islamic State.
Even before the announcement of Mr. Hagel’s removal, Obama officials were speculating on his possible replacement. At the top of the list are Michèle A. Flournoy, a former under secretary of defense; Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island and a former officer with the Army’s 82nd Airborne; and Ashton B. Carter, a former deputy secretary of defense.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/us/hagel-said-to-be-stepping-down-as-defense-chief-under-pressure.html?_r=0
― curmudgeon, Monday, 24 November 2014 15:43 (ten years ago)
whoa
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 November 2014 15:52 (ten years ago)
there's gonna be so much of this going on today: this facial expression
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Monday, 24 November 2014 16:07 (ten years ago)
surprised they didn't announce it on Friday?
good riddance
― Οὖτις, Monday, 24 November 2014 17:58 (ten years ago)
There was a Friday dump no one posted about last week, and now I forget what it was. See, it works.
NYT Mag profile of Christie was valuable (aside from third-paragraph descrip of him shoving cheese-dripping nachos into his maw -- v substantive) for revealing the lobbyist / Beltway scumbag usage of "gets the joke."
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:00 (ten years ago)
I forget what it was.
Benghazi!
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:02 (ten years ago)
no, Shakey was on that WHO THE FUCK CARES FROM ALL SIDES ish
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:05 (ten years ago)
it was something of actual substance -- oh I know now! It wasn't a USG news release, but the NYT's top Saturday story (so *they* dumped it).
http://www.democracynow.org/2014/11/24/after_vowing_to_end_combat_mission
President Obama has secretly extended the U.S. role in Afghanistan despite earlier promises to wind down America’s longest war. According to the New York Times, Obama has signed a classified order that ensures U.S. troops will have a direct role in fighting. In addition, the order reportedly enables American jets, bombers and drones to bolster Afghan troops on combat missions. And, under certain circumstances, it would apparently authorize U.S. air-strikes to support Afghan military operations throughout the country. The decision contradicts Obama’s earlier announcement that the U.S. military would have no combat role in Afghanistan next year. Afghanistan’s new president Ashraf Ghani has also backed an expanded U.S. military role. Ghani, who took office in September, has also reportedly lifted limits on U.S. airstrikes and joint raids that his predecessor Hamid Karzai had put in place....
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/us/politics/in-secret-obama-extends-us-role-in-afghan-combat.html
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:10 (ten years ago)
more context for Hagel's boot.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:14 (ten years ago)
btw Impeach Obama
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:17 (ten years ago)
hagel seemed like he barely had a handle on anything.. and his voice makes it seem like he spends his nights with a whiskey bottle and a carton of cigarettes
im shocked there's no republican nominee out there.. I thought dem presidents were required to have a republican sec of defense now bc we live in a postpartisan era.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:25 (ten years ago)
remember this dude:
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/secretaries/hstimson.gif
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 November 2014 18:37 (ten years ago)
MJ (Mike) Rosenberg @MJayRosenbergFollow
BREAKING. Prime Minister Netanyahu to announce his choice for Secretary of Defense to replace Hagel in December
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 24 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
clink!
― Mordy, Monday, 24 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
ba-dum chik!
i'm all for impeaching the president but unfortunately when that happens it'll be for one of the decent things he's done, not one of the awful things
― I dunno. (amateurist), Monday, 24 November 2014 20:03 (ten years ago)
not sure who they will get to replace Hagel, not sure anyone they pick would be any better.
― akm, Monday, 24 November 2014 20:59 (ten years ago)
surely not "better" in any way /we/ would actually think would be better (as in, promoting better policy)
but maybe "better" as in "better optics"--like someone said above, hagel seemed painfully out of his depth even more he was confirmed
― I dunno. (amateurist), Monday, 24 November 2014 20:59 (ten years ago)
even BEFORE
― I dunno. (amateurist), Monday, 24 November 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
Not his fault he was questioned by morons during his confirmation hearings
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 24 November 2014 21:54 (ten years ago)
loooool ted cruz
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has an outside-the-box idea for President Barack Obama: tap Joe Lieberman to replace Chuck Hagel, who announced on Monday he will step down as secretary of defense.Cruz called the Democrat-turned-independent former senator a "strong option.""We need a Secretary of Defense who is squarely focused on defending the national security interests of the United States, first and foremost, and especially preventing a bad deal over Iran's nuclear weapons program that could do irreparable harm to us and our allies. One strong option would be former Sen. Joe Lieberman, a member of the President's own party with deep experience and unshakable commitment to the security of the United States. I urge the President to give him full and fair consideration for this critical position," Cruz said Monday in a prepared statement.
Cruz called the Democrat-turned-independent former senator a "strong option."
"We need a Secretary of Defense who is squarely focused on defending the national security interests of the United States, first and foremost, and especially preventing a bad deal over Iran's nuclear weapons program that could do irreparable harm to us and our allies. One strong option would be former Sen. Joe Lieberman, a member of the President's own party with deep experience and unshakable commitment to the security of the United States. I urge the President to give him full and fair consideration for this critical position," Cruz said Monday in a prepared statement.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 00:33 (ten years ago)
gonna say "get this: joe lieberman" every day for the next fifty years in a different context each time
― schlump, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 00:34 (ten years ago)
loool
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 00:36 (ten years ago)
Not his fault he was questioned by morons during his confirmation hearings― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 24, 2014 3:54 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 24, 2014 3:54 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well, sure. but even in that context he turned in a particularly embarrassing performance, i thought.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 01:11 (ten years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, November 24, 2014 2:35 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Right because Obama and Netanyahu don't hate each other.
Who is this idiot?
― benbbag, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 06:44 (ten years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/us/politics/charles-e-schumer-to-urge-democrats-to-embrace-government.html
Right on
― benbbag, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 12:08 (ten years ago)
Schmuck Schumer
― this horrible, rotten slog to rigor mortis (Dr Morbius), Friday, October 31, 2014 10:50 AM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
"cute," goy
― benbbag, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 12:09 (ten years ago)
hasnt really prevented one from eating shit tho has it
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 12:17 (ten years ago)
Right, we're juuust little more powerful than Israel
― benbbag, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 12:47 (ten years ago)
rong again, go fuck yourself, and bye
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 12:58 (ten years ago)
schumer is awful on a lot (most?) things but i respect him for that.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 16:33 (ten years ago)
top of the morning to you, morbs.
lol suck it GOP
A complicating factor, however, is that the primary agency responsible for carrying out the president’s executive action is United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is financed entirely through fees collected from immigration applications and therefore cannot be defunded in the appropriations process.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 18:31 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/ChuckCJohnson/status/540003551963934720
love this guy's continuing adventures as Jonah from Veep irl
― anonanon, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 04:49 (ten years ago)
screenshot of pre-edit tweet
https://twitter.com/TheTomasRios/status/540002571512205312
― anonanon, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 04:53 (ten years ago)
omg jonah from veep
― some dude, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 05:16 (ten years ago)
heh. i'm watching obama speak at the 2014 White House Tribal Nations Conference, and he mentioned that he was moved by the issues facing tribes, to the point of tearing up. then he said "and listen, i have to do a lot of bad things in the oval office...(enormous pregnant pause)...and it's not often that i get choked up."
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 21:57 (ten years ago)
*jumpcut to obama authorizing another murderous drone strike with a steely militant gaze*
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 21:58 (ten years ago)
like I've said, I find his apparent self-hatred somewhat humanizing.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:00 (ten years ago)
that is crazy
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:01 (ten years ago)
I mean that a president would say that in public
agreed that none of the four Bushes and Clintons would say it
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:04 (ten years ago)
i doubt anyone will cover it, but right after he said "bad" it did seem like he thought "...SHIT!". i was expecting him to deviate from the script and say "bad as in...difficult...not bad as in evil...ahem"
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:05 (ten years ago)
'usually i handle that shit like a cucumber tho'
― j., Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:06 (ten years ago)
NYT: President Obama, speaking on the (Staten Island) grand jury decision, said that he was committed to making sure that the country remained a place where everyone believed that all people are equal under the law....
“We are not going to let up,” Mr. Obama said, “until we see a strengthening of the trust and strengthening of the accountability that exists between our communities and our law enforcement.”
just gobbledygook generalities thus far
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:07 (ten years ago)
a place where everyone believed that all people are equal under the law
doesn't have to be true, just as long as they believe it amirite
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:09 (ten years ago)
^That copy has been magically cleaned up in the last 10 minutes at the Times site. I thought only Gawker did stuff like that.
“When anybody in this country is not being treated equally under the law, that is a problem, and it’s my job as president to help solve it,” Mr. Obama said to American Indian leaders in Washington.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 22:17 (ten years ago)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_12/what_specifically_should_democ053162.php
here’s Paul Krugman:
I’ve been getting correspondence from people saying that I need to respond to Tom Edsall channeling Chuck Schumer on how health reform was a mistake, Obama should have focused on the economy.
The thing is, I responded to this argument four years ago, and everything I said then still applies. When people say that Obama should have “focused” on the economy, what, specifically, are they saying he should have done? Enacted a bigger stimulus? Maybe he could have done that at the very beginning, but that wouldn’t have conflicted with the effort to pass health reform — and anyway, I don’t hear many of the “focus” types saying that. So what do they mean? Obama should have gone around squinting and saying “I’m focused on the economy”? What would that have done?
Look, governing is not just theater. For sure the weakness of the recovery has hurt Democrats. But “focusing”, whatever that means, wouldn’t have delivered more job growth. What should Obama have done that he actually could have done in the face of scorched-earth Republican opposition? And how, if at all, did health reform stand in the way of doing whatever it is you’re saying he should have done?
I have seen no answer to these questions.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 4 December 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
Krugman otm. this is the sort of mindless conventional wisdom that rarely gets challenged because it sounds vaguely like an insight.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, 4 December 2014 20:35 (ten years ago)
Imo he should've pushed an energy/climate change bill.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 December 2014 21:12 (ten years ago)
imo he should push Schumer through a skyscraper window
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 December 2014 21:13 (ten years ago)
sounds like Wall Street told Schmuckie they don't like health care
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 December 2014 21:15 (ten years ago)
Of course no one else is saying that tho.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 December 2014 21:15 (ten years ago)
Er xp
When people say that Obama should have “focused” on the economy, what, specifically, are they saying he should have done?
Corporate tax cuts!
― The Thelonius Monk of nu-ki? (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 4 December 2014 21:43 (ten years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/12/04/huge-shakeup-at-the-new-republic-what-does-this-vanity-publisher-want/?wpisrc=nl-wonkbk&wpmm=1
political writers seeking jobs...
― curmudgeon, Friday, 5 December 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
wonder if the shakeup has anything to do with the really great article they published yesterday, This Radiohead Song Perfectly Explains John Boehner's Immigration Problem
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 5 December 2014 15:42 (ten years ago)
Just noticed right-wing blogger Rubin's November critique of Dems, borrowed from knucklehead Mark Halperin. Reid and Pelosi are old, and Dems ideas are old, but Republicans are young and have new ideas... :
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/11/11/hey-the-democrats-are-all-old/
The problem with President Obama was not that he was too young, but that his ideas were rooted in 1960′s liberalism and that he lacked executive know-how. He was “cool” so he attracted many the casual, often younger voter. Hillary Clinton has the same infirmities, but is among the least “cool” politicians around. The GOP should be able to make some real inroads with younger voters, especially those who during the Obama years did not see themselves attaining, let alone surpassing, their parents’ success.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 5 December 2014 17:36 (ten years ago)
yes the young would prefer refreshing supply side tax cuts to hilary c introducing single payer. run with that
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 5 December 2014 17:40 (ten years ago)
She's going to introduce single-payer?? Second year of third term?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 December 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
― example (crüt), Friday, 5 December 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
pls to explain what new ideas republicans have other than letting the national health insurance system self destruct once they repeal obamacare
other than that its all kickbacks to oil companies and rich people.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 5 December 2014 19:04 (ten years ago)
privatizing social security!deporting all immigrants!outlawing everything (except guns)!
― Οὖτις, Friday, 5 December 2014 19:06 (ten years ago)
literally every single thought expressed here is wrong
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 6 December 2014 00:30 (ten years ago)
that is the Jennifer Rubin trademark, yes
― JoeStork, Saturday, 6 December 2014 01:54 (ten years ago)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, December 4, 2014 4:15 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
As usual, you know nothing about Chuck Schumer, and the special irony here is that it's he, not Krugman, who's being the idealistic one here, actually believing that you can sell a Democratic vision of government (if you couch it in Clintonesque we're-all-in-this-together "middle class" terms; see his Positively American book), rather than (arguably cynically or lazily) falling back on the stuff that doesn't really require you to try, like passing a Republican health-care plan that you can get through because it has insurance industry buy-in (because it's a managed 2-3-decade (inevitable) decline, made slower without a public option, rather than the death sentence that would be single-payer; http://hotair.com/archives/2014/12/03/harkin-yeah-obamacare-was-a-mistake/), or executive action like most of the administration's fairly moderate regulatory efforts on climate (where we're slightly ratcheting up fuel economy in a way that technology mostly would anyway or stopping construction of new coal power plants that wouldn't have gotten built anyway given natural gas prices - but haven't quite gotten to more serious controls on existing plants, etc.) or immigration (mostly a temporary fix prodded in part by tech industry buy-in and even they don't think it goes far enough) or stuff like the China treaty that Morbs thinks is "hardmanning" even though it requires nearly nothing China wasn't doing already (not that it isn't a very good symbolic response to the footdraggers who say China isn't on board, and prod to who may be the most recalcitrant of all, India). It's Krugman who's saying you shouldn't have bothered trying for the more serious stimulus and other public investment in jobs (that he's been saying, rightly, that we need for the past 6 years), because it wasn't going to happen. Maybe Paul doesn't want Chuck on his territory (and reframing his message)? Even giving him the benefit of the doubt - he's certainly smarter than me, and I generally agree with him - his absence of ideas regarding how to approach the problem does not at all mean that they don't exist. I mean, sorry, Paul, but you aren't a politician; this isn't what you do.
I'm not necessarily taking sides here - I see both sides of most of these unscientific arguments, both policy and political, and I've long responded to many of the you're-no-LBJ (read: HRC) strategy complainers (some of whom are sour-grapers) that they overlook just how well the administration has exercised the art of the possible in a somewhat-rigged game, something I'm not sure any alternative would have matched (though it's certainly possible they could have done so, or exceeded), or just how (at least short-term) canny saving the politics for the campaign and the policy for power might be. But 5 or 6 years ago I had pretty much the same reaction that Schumer does now - I wanted "economy"/jobs and climate first because those were the most salient and biggest issues, respectively, and I do think there was a measure of political tone-deafness in not sufficiently emphasizing the former, at least as a political matter. That may not matter much in Presidential years (as long as the Obama coalition holds, which is probable but not a certainty and may require the difficult replication of some of his personal characteristics, including cool, race, generation, authenticity, and, despite the cynicism, ingenuousness), and I regard the post-midterm handwringing as way overdone, but getting less than 1/3 of the white vote is not something you can ignore, especially given the prospect that you may not continue to get more than 2/3 of the hispanic (or asian) vote, and if the administration is going to focus obsessively on the policy it can achieve while it holds the reins of power, someone needs to pick up the political slack with an eye towards what follows them. I think Schumer's among the DC Democrats with better ideas about how to do it, better than Harry Reid at least. I don't ignore the rejoinder that you can care about the politics to the exclusion of the policy, but it cannot be denied that the former is the necessary predicate to the latter.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Saturday, 6 December 2014 05:43 (ten years ago)
Why are we talking about Rubin, among the clueless-est of the clueless?
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Saturday, 6 December 2014 05:47 (ten years ago)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/02/chuck-schumer-elizabeth-warren_n_5639338.html
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Saturday, 6 December 2014 06:03 (ten years ago)
the Art of the Possible According to benbbag, ladies and gentlemen, who wants us all to think like politicians whether it's our job or not
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 6 December 2014 09:54 (ten years ago)
like the China treaty that Morbs thinks is "hardmanning'
nahhhh, not quite
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 6 December 2014 09:56 (ten years ago)
keep up yr inside baseball while Rome burns, tho
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 6 December 2014 10:01 (ten years ago)
It takes all kinds, morbs. As long as the inside baseball players aren't actively working against the eventual goal, then the energy they spend on legislative minutiae and arcana may be like the mountain that groaned and brought forth a mouse, but at least they're trying. Don't treat them like the enemy unless they act like the enemy.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Saturday, 6 December 2014 17:56 (ten years ago)
x-post re benbbag's insider baseball
someone needs to pick up the political slack with an eye towards what follows them. I think Schumer's among the DC Democrats with better ideas about how to do it, better than Harry Reid at least.
As Kevin Drum noted in MJ, where are these economic ideas. I never saw Schumer push for a better stimulus bill. As for reframing a message toward the middle class, how did/does Schumer's pro-Wall Street message (supporting Geithner, watering down Dodd-Frank, etc.) help? Schumer also did not push anything that would help underwater homeowners, those with college loan issues,the minimum wage, etc.
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 6 December 2014 18:56 (ten years ago)
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Chuck_Schumer_Is_Wrong_About_Many_Things
― curmudgeon, Saturday, 6 December 2014 18:57 (ten years ago)
sorry Aimless, the Democratic Party is an enemy of progressive policy. Period.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 6 December 2014 19:16 (ten years ago)
schumer is terrible and holding him up as any kind of model for how we can 'sell a democratic vision of government' to the public is insane.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 6 December 2014 20:37 (ten years ago)
― curmudgeon, Saturday, December 6, 2014 1:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This, in broad strokes, is what he proposed in 2009: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/01/the-man-in-the-middle/307209/3/
See, p. 2 of the article for what he pushed in '06 (and p. 1 for why he thinks the minimum wage, e.g., is the wrong focus).
It's very suburban in orientation, which is very much not mine, but that's where elections are fought these days.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Sunday, 7 December 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
Reforming the financial industry would further increase confidence and allay middle-class worries about mortgages and retirement accounts. An energy plan that takes steps to reduce dependence on foreign oil and to promote green alternatives would convince a middle class spooked by $4-a-gallon gasoline that, even if the government cannot control market volatility and prices in the short term, it is taking concrete steps toward solving the problem.
Regarding these 2 items from Schumer---1. He tried to undermine reform of the financial industry, not reform it. 2. A green energy plan attracts the well-educated Democratic voters who are already voting for Dems; it does not attract working class voters who you want to come back to the Dems.
Schumer's other ideas regarding provisions to increase middle-class savings and eventually tame the deficit, could have been pushed in addition to healthcare (and I think were part of the discussion then going on).
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 7 December 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
it's very suburban in orientation, which is very much not mine, but that's where elections are fought these days.
Schumer has not and does not know how to attract these voters
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 7 December 2014 21:10 (ten years ago)
Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu's 12-point loss in a weekend runoff ended up closer than several polls suggested it could be. But an Associated Press analysis of the returns show that a slide in turnout simply wasn't enough for Landrieu to recover the ground she'd lost since her last victory six years ago.
White non-urban male vote does her in...and yeah I know she was no liberal. Insider Cokie Roberts on NPR talked about it this morning in terms of history (white and Black votes for each party), but she resisted, of course, drawing any connections
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/07/mary-landrieu-bill-cassidy_n_6285354.html
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 December 2014 14:44 (ten years ago)
as usual none of the pandering helped
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 December 2014 14:45 (ten years ago)
pandering always helps, it's part of The Long Game (TM)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 December 2014 15:34 (ten years ago)
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/07/thomas_frank_ann_coulter_and_david_brooks_play_a_sneaky_unserious_class_card/
Thomas Frank on class issues
When Democrats finally get over the impulse to deny and prevaricate and blame others, and instead ask where they themselves went wrong, one place they might begin is their beloved issue of free trade. Take NAFTA, the granddaddy of all trade agreements, whose twentieth anniversary we celebrated this year: There has never been a more obviously class-based piece of legislation. It was supported with uncanny unanimity by members of the commentariat and the professional class, and, indeed, it has worked well for such people. For members of the working class, however, it has been precisely the disaster their organizations predicted.
The deal crushed enthusiasm for the Democratic Party among the working-class voters who were then considered part of the Democratic base and contributed to the Democrats’ loss of the House of Representatives in 1994, a disaster from which, the economist Jeff Faux wrote in 2006, “the Democratic Party still has not recovered.” And, indeed, from which the party seemingly has no desire to recover. Just the other day, President Obama announced that he is fired up and ready to go . . . with the Republicans in Congress on the Trans Pacific Partnership, even though much of his own party is opposed to it.
Democrats who sign up for our master class on classism might also look back over their response to the financial crisis, during which they bailed out their BFFs on Wall Street and let everyone else go to hell. Or the many favors they failed to do for their former BFFs in organized labor. Or their lack of interest in getting a public option included in health-care reform.
Agree with him in part, but sometime's he not realistic--not sure a public option could have passed
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 December 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
― curmudgeon, Sunday, December 7, 2014 4:10 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
If only there were a basis for this assertion.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 03:21 (ten years ago)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, December 6, 2014 2:16 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You ain't Him.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 05:41 (ten years ago)
debate between Ed Kilgore and Tomasky regarding "writing off" the South:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2014_12/do_democrats_need_to_hate_on_t053218.php
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 14:23 (ten years ago)
here come da torture report
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 15:23 (ten years ago)
Me = Tomasky. My wife = Kilgore.
― WilliamC, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 16:19 (ten years ago)
any surprises in this CIA report (I'm guessing not)
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 16:34 (ten years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/senate-cia-torture-report-realsed?utm_content=buffer9797e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
― i blow goat farts, aka garts for a living (waterface), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 16:37 (ten years ago)
The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released its report on CIA torture techniques, according to an analysis published by The Daily Beast.
The report reveals that detainees were subjected to "rectal feeding" and "rectal hydration " even if they did not have medical need.
well, as long as we don't turn this into a partisan witchhunt amirite
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
$81 million to the psychologists turned outside contractors who devised the interrogation techniques with the idea, 'induce learned helplessness in them'
― j., Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:01 (ten years ago)
learned helplessness
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:03 (ten years ago)
a common affliction of the Democrat party
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:04 (ten years ago)
so I'm guessing the upshot/ramifications of this is going to be .... nothing
pretty much. but still can't wait for state of the art "conservative" defenses of torture to start rolling out. the old excuses were getting stale
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:04 (ten years ago)
Cheney unmuzzled last weekend
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:05 (ten years ago)
this is why I write off the entire country rather than the South
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
if only there was someone Cheney could shoot in the face to distract the public from all this
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/lzvzmll.png
― Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
it's almost like we need should empanel a grand jury or somethi
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:12 (ten years ago)
Oh good we also threatened to rape the mothers and daughters of prisoners.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 18:06 (ten years ago)
Christopher Hayes @chrislhayes 27m27 minutes ago
We rectally fed some folks.
― j., Tuesday, 9 December 2014 20:54 (ten years ago)
they hate us for our freedoms!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:56 (ten years ago)
looks like they have a spending deal.
i like this little paragraph buried near the bottom:
One of the most notable changes includes dramatically expanding the amount of money that wealthy political donors could give the national parties, drastically undercutting the 2002 landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance overhaul. Top donors would be allowed to give three times the annual cap on national party donations to three additional party committees set up for the purposes of the presidential conventions, building expenses and election recounts.
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 15:16 (ten years ago)
the rich know best. otherwise they wouldn't be rich! soon it will be morning in america
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 15:39 (ten years ago)
on another budget-related note, stories like this scare the shit out of me:
Top Republicans, eyeing full control of Congress next year, are considering changing the rules of the budget process so as to make tax cuts appear less harmful to the deficit.They want to adopt a method called "dynamic scoring," popular among conservatives since the 1970s, which scores budgets under the controversial assumption that tax cuts generate economic growth and make up for lost revenue — something critics have likened to "fairy dust." The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the official scorekeeper, does not use the method, but Republicans, and even some conservative Democrats, want it to....There's little doubt that a Republican Congress would have the majority of votes: needed to establish dynamic scoring. The House passed a bill to do that in April 2014 and even the Democratic-led Senate narrowly endorsed the idea in 2013.The deficit-hiking impact of tax cuts has posed problems for Ryan every year since 2011. In his budget blueprints for the GOP, he has proposed to reduce the deficit while enacting large tax cuts, raising military spending, and refusing to cut so much as a penny from Medicare or Social Security over the 10-year budget window. Democrats have made the case that those numbers cannot add up without savage cuts to popular domestic discretionary programs like Pell Grants, Head Start, food stamps and Medicaid.
They want to adopt a method called "dynamic scoring," popular among conservatives since the 1970s, which scores budgets under the controversial assumption that tax cuts generate economic growth and make up for lost revenue — something critics have likened to "fairy dust." The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the official scorekeeper, does not use the method, but Republicans, and even some conservative Democrats, want it to.
...There's little doubt that a Republican Congress would have the majority of votes: needed to establish dynamic scoring. The House passed a bill to do that in April 2014 and even the Democratic-led Senate narrowly endorsed the idea in 2013.
The deficit-hiking impact of tax cuts has posed problems for Ryan every year since 2011. In his budget blueprints for the GOP, he has proposed to reduce the deficit while enacting large tax cuts, raising military spending, and refusing to cut so much as a penny from Medicare or Social Security over the 10-year budget window. Democrats have made the case that those numbers cannot add up without savage cuts to popular domestic discretionary programs like Pell Grants, Head Start, food stamps and Medicaid.
it's just wonky enough that few people are bound to understand the impact of the switch, let alone get worked up about it
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:00 (ten years ago)
http://www.quickmeme.com/img/e7/e77030ee04541d19a7af0a59271767c990566562de9bcb6a7b9f133c44234fc9.jpg
...and then we built that assumption into the budget process!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:02 (ten years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/congressional-leaders-hammer-out-deal-to-allow-pension-plans-to-cut-retiree-benefits/2014/12/09/4650d420-7ef6-11e4-9f38-95a187e4c1f7_story.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:08 (ten years ago)
Pension? Who cares what happens to those elitist pensioners?
I know those wealthy donors can break $4 billion on the next Prez Olympics, I know they can...
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:11 (ten years ago)
on the whole tax cuts = increased revenue thing:
just out of curiosity, do people that express a belief in trickle down economics think that the effect continues indefinitely, with more and more tax cuts resulting in more and more economic growth? in other words, do they believe that every single incremental tax cut, down to 0%, would continue to be beneficial for the economy? or is that some sort of lower limit on tax rates that they wouldn't want to exceed?
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:23 (ten years ago)
just enough to maintain the rectal feeding budget of the national security state, not quite enough to prevent roads and bridges from being privatized
― j., Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:26 (ten years ago)
Of course!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:29 (ten years ago)
xxp, the Laffer Curve, which is the origin of trickle-down/supply side philosophy, shows tax revenue of zero at both 0% taxation and 100% taxation. The problem is that its proponents assume it's a smooth inverted-U curve with a revenue-increasing midpoint that we are always exceeding no matter how low we make taxes.
― Οὖτις Δαυ & τηε Κνιγητσ (Phil D.), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:33 (ten years ago)
i ask just because if the CBO were forced to use trickle down theory/"dynamic scoring", then (i think) they would have to update their budget scoring methodology, which is publicly accessible, which would then (i think) force them to actually come up with a tax rate point where the supposed economic benefits of tax cuts end?
that's probably not clear, sorry. i just mean that in seinfeld terms, i feel like trickle down theory is the Penske File and if they managed to incorporate it into CBO's methodology they'd also be forced to give a humiliating hour long presentation on the Penske File where it's revealed that no economist actually supports it?
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:35 (ten years ago)
xpost thanks phil, i'll read up on that later today
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 16:36 (ten years ago)
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/wall-street-seeks-to-tuck-dodd-frank-changes-in-budget-bill/
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:19 (ten years ago)
I'm not sure "tuck" is the first verb i thought of
a shame as D-F has been working so wonderfully
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:22 (ten years ago)
If included in the final spending bill, the proposals would represent the greatest threat yet to Dodd-Frank, the most comprehensive regulatory overhaul since the Depression and one of the Obama administration’s signature legislative achievements.
yeah, sad lol there.
but still, inserting legislation that was essentially written by Citigroup that weakens the already weak regulation on derivatives is shameful. i thought that it would be ted cruz et al that would force a shutdown, if anyone, but with all of this garbage inserted into the cromnibus at the last minute, i hope that dems will stand up to this bullshit
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:29 (ten years ago)
looks like i got my wish.
Congressional liberals rebelled Wednesday against a must-pass spending bill that would keep the government open past midnight Thursday, complaining that it would roll back critical limits on Wall Street and sharply increase the influence of wealthy campaign donors.Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a popular figure on the left, led the insurrection with a speech on the Senate floor, calling the $1.01 trillion spending bill “the worst of government for the rich and powerful.”Warren urged House Democrats to withhold their support from the measure in a vote scheduled for Thursday. But the fear of shutting down federal agencies for the second time in just over a year appeared to weigh more heavily on Democratic leaders than liberal outrage.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a popular figure on the left, led the insurrection with a speech on the Senate floor, calling the $1.01 trillion spending bill “the worst of government for the rich and powerful.”
Warren urged House Democrats to withhold their support from the measure in a vote scheduled for Thursday. But the fear of shutting down federal agencies for the second time in just over a year appeared to weigh more heavily on Democratic leaders than liberal outrage.
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 11 December 2014 14:16 (ten years ago)
They should take it down to 0%, then just keep going. Then, once they start giving a significant amount of money back - like, say, -20% taxes or something - we will see growth. You have to trickle down all the way before it trickles back up.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 December 2014 14:24 (ten years ago)
This likely won't end well...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/warren-leads-liberal-democrats-rebellion-over-provisions-in-1-trillion-spending-bill/2014/12/10/c5c915e4-80b5-11e4-9f38-95a187e4c1f7_story.html
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) both expressed concerns about the measure but were not mobilizing members to vote against it.
Meanwhile, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said that “it is certainly possible that the president could sign this piece of legislation,” even though it would undo a pillar of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul by freeing banks to more readily trade the exotic investments known as derivatives. The legislation ranks among the administration’s biggest domestic achievements.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 December 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
won't end well for who? they'll pass the bill, warren and the handful of people who care will be disappointed, <2% of voters will remember next week
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 11 December 2014 15:43 (ten years ago)
Won't end well for the Warren faction or others opposed to these various provisions...
Right-wingers are of course complaining that there are not enough such provisions
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 December 2014 15:56 (ten years ago)
The Democratic Party: Expressing Concern
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 December 2014 16:16 (ten years ago)
...tho not much about Perpetual war.
"What contours does the administration seek in the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against ISIS that it supposedly wants Congress to pass? According to Kerry, the administration wants no contours, really, at all."
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/11/white_houses_shameful_aumf_request_give_us_a_blank_check_for_war/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 December 2014 16:34 (ten years ago)
so more of the same really
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 December 2014 16:35 (ten years ago)
then there's other matter that concerns Warren: the undersecretary of the treasury. Charles Pierce:
Lazard will pay Weiss a $21 million bonus just for taking the Treasury job, in which he'll be intimately involved with the industry Weiss is now leaving, however temporarily. How does this not seem to be a form of pre-emptive bribery?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 11 December 2014 16:51 (ten years ago)
if only they hadn't waited until the day it was due to vote on it. now those that do care about such things are in a tricky spot, timecrunched, outnumbered, out-politicked (if they managed to hold up the spending bill to fix the landmines contained within, it would shut down the government and they'd take the blame). what a coincidence that it happened this way!!!!!!!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 11 December 2014 17:00 (ten years ago)
I lol'd pretty hard here
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Thursday, 11 December 2014 17:40 (ten years ago)
...Before We Vote with the Shitheads
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 December 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
Obama 2012: so more of the same really
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:00 (ten years ago)
Far from being slipped into the measure in the dark of night, as Warren and some other liberals claimed, the provision was approved through the regular House committee process and then negotiated directly with Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.), according to aides in both parties.
Aides to Mikulski and other Democratic leaders said the spending measure could have been worse. They said Mikulski successfully turned back other GOP requests to amend Dodd-Frank and extracted more money from Republicans for federal watchdog agencies, including $150 million for the Securities and Exchange Commission and $35 million for the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
disappointed in you, Barbara
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:06 (ten years ago)
more evidence that the absence of "bipartisan cooperation" is ABSOLUTE SHIT
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:08 (ten years ago)
this is total bullshit. these fucking clowns barely stay in town long enough to actually legislate, then what they put out is some porky giveaway to rich people and the banks. this place sucks I want out.
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:14 (ten years ago)
Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) signed on to a letter with Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) that calls on congressional leaders to scrap portions of the $1.1 trillion “cromnibus” that relax restrictions on banks trading financial derivatives.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/226816-gop-senator-criticizes-dodd-frank-rollback-in-cromnibus
Is a cromnibus like a cronut?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 11 December 2014 18:34 (ten years ago)
my personal interpretation is crominbus is a combination of cromulent and omnibus
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 11 December 2014 19:14 (ten years ago)
Milkuski (D-Md.) believed she was negotiating from a position of weakness, due to the fact that the Ds are just about to become the minority party, so that presumably the Rs will soon be able to pass whatever spending bills they please. Her biggest blind spot was thinking that the Rs are united enough to constitute an actual working majority, rather than being so divided that they'll publically piss all over themselves just trying to agree on a budget.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Thursday, 11 December 2014 19:15 (ten years ago)
it's ok, because once democrats get control of the house and senate back, i'm sure the republicans will cave on their spending bill during their lame duck session. right? loooool
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 11 December 2014 19:19 (ten years ago)
cromnibus passes 219-206
roll call: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/house-roll-call-spending-bill-27546780?singlePage=true
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 07:05 (ten years ago)
the washington post likes to insert not so subtle indicators of their stance on Elizabeth Warren:
For the Warren wing, what they see as siding with banks over average Americans is among the most unforgivable of sins, and the showdown exposed just how disruptive and demanding this populist bloc plans to be....The rift among the Democrats, which has grown wider since the party got beaten badly on Election Day, has left Obama and his would-be allies on the Hill increasingly pointing fingers at one another: Senate Democrats blame Obama for costing them their majority; White House officials blame them right back; and when the two sides agree, the populists in the Senate and House step in and try to blow it all up.They were successful late last month, when Reid was on the verge of a substantial pact with House Republicans to make permanent a crop of tax breaks. Just before Thanksgiving, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the chairman of the Finance Committee, broke up that deal with support from the White House and House Democrats who thought it gave away too much to corporate America.The result is the likely passage of legislation that merely kicks the can down the road, approving almost all of those breaks just for 2014 but leaving the issue to be debated again next year under the Republican-led House and Senate.The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren, who have energized activists across America and are beginning to pull other Democrats further to the left.
...The rift among the Democrats, which has grown wider since the party got beaten badly on Election Day, has left Obama and his would-be allies on the Hill increasingly pointing fingers at one another: Senate Democrats blame Obama for costing them their majority; White House officials blame them right back; and when the two sides agree, the populists in the Senate and House step in and try to blow it all up.
They were successful late last month, when Reid was on the verge of a substantial pact with House Republicans to make permanent a crop of tax breaks. Just before Thanksgiving, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the chairman of the Finance Committee, broke up that deal with support from the White House and House Democrats who thought it gave away too much to corporate America.
The result is the likely passage of legislation that merely kicks the can down the road, approving almost all of those breaks just for 2014 but leaving the issue to be debated again next year under the Republican-led House and Senate.
The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren, who have energized activists across America and are beginning to pull other Democrats further to the left.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congressional-democrats-take-a-stand-with-spending-bill/2014/12/11/b2246350-8181-11e4-8882-03cf08410beb_story.html
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 12 December 2014 14:56 (ten years ago)
are "average Americans" the same as the middle class?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
better to pass this so we can reinstate the derivative casino, and re-blow up the economy, than obstruct the GOP/citigroup. haven't democrats learned anything from the congeniality of the tea party since Obama took office?
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:15 (ten years ago)
yeah the tone of this morning's news coverage was almost relief that the Beltway press can now accuse Democrats of scuttling "bipartisanship" in anticipation of a shutdown.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:19 (ten years ago)
The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren The can-do desires of establishment Democrats have been increasingly drowned out by liberals like Warren
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:24 (ten years ago)
is the Senate sposed to pass this?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:24 (ten years ago)
after senate democrats get their chance to complain about the bill on an official record no one will read, they'll probably all vote for it yes.
― pursuit of happiness (art), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:45 (ten years ago)
no one they care about really suffers during financial crashes anyways
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 12 December 2014 15:50 (ten years ago)
lmao good catch Karl. just great reporting right there.
― goole, Friday, 12 December 2014 15:58 (ten years ago)
I'm gonna use it actually! Thanks, Karl.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:05 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/pkcapitol
Washington Post congressional reporter, devotee of Philly sports, Springsteen and all things UD Fightin' Blue Hens.
― goole, Friday, 12 December 2014 16:07 (ten years ago)
KM, do you mind if we shut your job down this one time?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:11 (ten years ago)
Was hearing the "oh, better this bill with just some bad changes, than a possible shutdown and the truly horrible bills Republicans will offer next year with their new majorities..." Actually, it would be better to have no such provisions this year and to have the President veto the even worse attempts, but oh no, that wouldn't be bipartisan
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 December 2014 16:17 (ten years ago)
of all the political news released in the last six weeks, this is the worst, with Barack Obama conspiring to make his presidency a non-entity.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:18 (ten years ago)
shutdowns are annoying (especially when you're juggling time-sensitive tasks) but they always provide backpay at the end of it, so at least you get to sit around and not worry about rent. so yeah go for it!
i don't think there's a chance that enough senate democrats will vote against it, though
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:19 (ten years ago)
yes you probly don't hafta worry
Obama's post-Admin job should be in the Orlando Hall of Presidents, as himself.
In NY I'm sure phoning Schumer wd be a lost cause, but if the vote count looks "good" they will let Gillibrand take a theatrical stand against it.
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
they have Dimon
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/12/government_by_wall_street_jpmorgan_ceo_whipped_votes_for_spending_bill/
we have Cher
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/11/cher_unloads_on_the_cromnibus_as_only_cher_can/
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 12 December 2014 16:31 (ten years ago)
So the White House supported the overall bill citing the increased leverage Republicans would have if appropriations levels were set early next year after the GOP Senate takeover. So 2 fiscal agencies will have more money to uh, enforce a weakened bill
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 December 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
Kevin Drum sez Dems haven't sold the "good" things in the bill:
What's the point of posting this laundry list? Curiosity. Last night a reader sent a tweet to me: "Honest question: what do progressives get out of this? 'Govt not shutting down' not enough." I was stumped. I really had no idea whether Democrats had gotten anything in this bill, or if they were just caving in to a whole bunch of obnoxious Republican demands merely in exchange for keeping the government funded.
But as it turns out, Democrats did get a bunch of stuff they wanted. And of course, that's in addition to getting the government funded before Republicans take over Congress in January, which is worthwhile all by itself. We can each decide for ourselves whether Democrats got enough, or if they should have held out for a better deal, but they weren't left empty-handed.
So what I'm curious about is this: why are virtually no Democrats talking about this? As near as I can tell, there was literally no attempt to sell this compromise to the base, or to anyone else. As a result, the general feeling among progressives is simple: this bill was an unqualified cave-in from gutless Democrats who, once again, refused to fight back against Republican hostage taking. And as usual, Republicans won.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 17:16 (ten years ago)
to implement the Administration’s strategy to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
oh yeah, big progressive priority this one rmde
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 December 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
this wapo blurb makes me want to kill
this piece of shit bill only funds the government to next fucking september
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 12 December 2014 17:49 (ten years ago)
yeah but bipartisanship
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 17:51 (ten years ago)
And the EPA budget wasn't cut by quite as much as the Republicans wanted and they didn't get their riders to kill more EPA regs; so in exchange for such niceness, the bipartisan Dems gave the Republicans the smaller IRS budget they wanted.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 December 2014 18:03 (ten years ago)
they did manage to insert a rider banning the regulation of cow belching - something that EPA has it has no intention of regulating about NINETEEN TRILLION TIMES ALREADY
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 12 December 2014 18:05 (ten years ago)
but don't worry america - now EPA can't regulate cow farts. ♫ let freedom ring! ♫
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Friday, 12 December 2014 18:06 (ten years ago)
Plus there’s a lot more money for early-childhood development
I bet its less than corporations will get from this budget and its provisions; and the fact that Dems have to fight for this in the first place is unfortunate. I guess I am not as much of a realist on this as Kevin Drum
― curmudgeon, Friday, 12 December 2014 18:09 (ten years ago)
Well! Justice Dept won't prosecute James Risen.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 12 December 2014 23:42 (ten years ago)
huh wonder what prompted that
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 December 2014 23:45 (ten years ago)
CIA doesn't want the source revealed maybe?
― Οὖτις, Friday, 12 December 2014 23:46 (ten years ago)
"cow farts"
http://epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/ch4.html
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Saturday, 13 December 2014 03:25 (ten years ago)
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/methane-fracking-obama-climate-change-bill-mckibben
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Saturday, 13 December 2014 03:26 (ten years ago)
i think Karl Malone put that in the climate thread in September
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 13 December 2014 05:51 (ten years ago)
cromnibus passes Senate 56-40
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 14 December 2014 05:56 (ten years ago)
The thinnest of silver linings:
While Republican senators were fuming at Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) for holding up a $1.1 trillion spending bill aimed at preventing a government shutdown, Democrats saw a silver lining: the move by Cruz and Lee gave Democrats an opening to move a number of President Barack Obama's nominees for federal judgeships and the executive branch.
What happened was that when Cruz and Lee scuttled a deal between Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) that would have allowed lawmakers to leave Washington D.C. for the weekend and come back Monday they gave Democrats a chance to advance Obama's presidential appointees by having to stay in D.C. to deal with the spending bill.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 14 December 2014 13:09 (ten years ago)
surgeon general too fwiw
Thanks Ted. From the NY Times story on this:
By carving out more legislative time, Mr. Cruz inadvertently enabled the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, to advance two dozen nominations, including several contentious ones that would otherwise have faced a more difficult confirmation process.
“It will have the end result of causing nominees who I think are not well qualified to be confirmed, so I don’t understand the approach that he is taking,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine. “And I think it’s very unfortunate and counterproductive.”
― curmudgeon, Sunday, 14 December 2014 14:06 (ten years ago)
nominees who I think are not well qualified
I'd love to hear her opinion on some of dubya's appointments who were duly confirmed by the senate. Head of FEMA comes quickly to mind.
― oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Sunday, 14 December 2014 19:16 (ten years ago)
Also buried in the giant spending bill that cleared the Senate on Saturday and is headed to President Obama for his signature were provisions that prohibit the federal government from requiring less salt in school lunches and allow schools to obtain exemptions from whole-grain requirements for pasta and tortillas.
The watered-down standards for school meals were a setback for the first lady, Michelle Obama, who had vowed to fight “until the bitter end” for tougher nutrition standards. But they were a victory for food companies and some local school officials, who had sought changes in regulations that are taking effect over several years
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/15/us/politics/in-final-spending-bill-salty-food-and-belching-cows-are-winners.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
― curmudgeon, Monday, 15 December 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
the earlier we start naturally selecting the children fittest to survive -- in this case, those who know better than to eat unhealthy school lunches -- the better off those future freedom leaders will be
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 15 December 2014 15:56 (ten years ago)
the Art of the Possible According to benbbag
this made me lol unreasonably hard
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 15 December 2014 17:09 (ten years ago)
have a better sense of both the art and the possible than the commenter(s) tbh
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Tuesday, 16 December 2014 05:31 (ten years ago)
^Lonesome Rhodes
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 December 2014 13:28 (ten years ago)
let us lol at this activist judge
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 December 2014 21:31 (ten years ago)
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-medical-pot-20141216-story.html
Dana Rohrabacher is a horrible douchebag but I guess even horrible douchebags can do good things sometimes
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 December 2014 23:00 (ten years ago)
wow that... snuck under the radar
― Nhex, Tuesday, 16 December 2014 23:58 (ten years ago)
only in effect till next september tho
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 00:38 (ten years ago)
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:28 AM (14 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
A young Lee Remick? Yes, please.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 04:17 (ten years ago)
http://www.azquotes.com/quote/579754
Same sense of entitlement that applies to the money side of privilege; no surprise that easy riders went right-wing.
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 04:21 (ten years ago)
(n.b. "douchebag" "good things" are umlaut's, not mine)
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 04:22 (ten years ago)
maybe it's the paucity of good news these days but i found the announcement of changes in cuba policy really moving
― goole, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:29 (ten years ago)
finally.
― goole, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
anyone wanna bet obama and the next attorney general, after 14 long, long years, try khalid sheikh mohammed before the supreme court, then cheney and bush for torture, pre-empting whatever republican bullshit showtrials are planned for the next two years? i'll wager 911 WMDs!
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:39 (ten years ago)
that would be a good SNL alt-universe sketch, where Obama turns into Noam Chomsky
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:48 (ten years ago)
he's a socialist muslim though i've heard tell
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:56 (ten years ago)
obama could literally turn into noam chomsky tomorrow and you'd still get ppl calling him worse than cheney
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
i don't think we need to worry
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
surprised there hasn't been more chatter about it here --- seems like kind of a big deal, no?
― gbx, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 20:35 (ten years ago)
well people helpfully revived every cuba thread they could find
― goole, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
Rubio looks like a little kid with a combover
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 20:55 (ten years ago)
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:14 PM (43 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I have to hand it to you, that is one hell of a 1st class, never-to-be-testable conditional hypothetical posing as an obviously verifiable assertion.
― Vic Perry, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 21:01 (ten years ago)
but let's look forward not backward
― Vic Perry, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 21:03 (ten years ago)
or sideward into alternate dimensions
― Vic Perry, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 21:04 (ten years ago)
its too late I guess no one cares about the cigars anymore
― Brian Eno's Mother (Latham Green), Wednesday, 17 December 2014 21:28 (ten years ago)
sometimes a cigar is just a middle finger to marco rubio
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 17 December 2014 21:36 (ten years ago)
xp: cigars could very well turn into bacon as a result of these events.
― the mooney tanuki (how's life), Thursday, 18 December 2014 12:36 (ten years ago)
Washington Post editorial is against the Cuba change, because creating diplomatic relations with Vietnam has not made that country a democracy or improved its human rights, and they are convinced this ochange won't help either. Plus they throw in some Venezuela comparisons.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-obama-administration-extends-the-castro-regime-in-cuba-a-bailout-it-doesnt-deserve/2014/12/17/a25a15d4-860c-11e4-9534-f79a23c40e6c_story.html
The Vietnam outcome is what the Castros are counting on: a flood of U.S. tourists and business investment that will allow the regime to maintain its totalitarian system indefinitely. Mr. Obama may claim that he has dismantled a 50-year-old failed policy; what he has really done is give a 50-year-old failed regime a new lease on life.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 18 December 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
WaPo editorial page is a horrorshow
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 15:23 (ten years ago)
Mr. Obama may claim that he has dismantled a 50-year-old failed policy; what he has really done is give a 50-year-old failed regime a new lease on life.
we were THIS close to finally crushing the Castros! THIS CLOSE!
― ya'll are the ones who don't know things (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 December 2014 15:26 (ten years ago)
good news:
President Barack Obama can thank outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) for triggering the "nuclear option" in November 2013 and securing him one of the most robust judicial legacies of any modern president.
In six years, he has appointed a whopping 307 judges, who will shape the law for decades after he leaves office. The final 12 district judges were confirmed in the closing night of the Senate session on Tuesday, Reid's final move before Democrats surrender control of the chamber.
"The Obama Administration and the United States Senate have given Americans the best possible holiday present: the gift of justice," said Nan Aron, the president of the progressive law and policy group Alliance For Justice.
A total of 132 judges were confirmed in the 113th Congress — the most since the 1970s.
Perhaps most significant is his appointment of 53 judges on federal circuit courts, which have the last word on most matters of law. When Obama took office, just one of 13 appeals courts had a majority of Democratic-appointed judges on the active bench. Today, nine of 13 appeals courts have a majority of Democratic appointees.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
but:
Research by political scientists Robert Carp and Kenneth Manning finds that Obama's judges are "somewhat more liberal than the Clinton judges but slightly less liberal than the Carter and Johnson jurists," based on an analysis of rulings from 1932 to 2013 by judges appointed by each of the Democratic presidents.
which dovetails with Obama's own politics.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 17:13 (ten years ago)
Still. Just the fact that they aren't repub nominees...
― Frederik B, Thursday, 18 December 2014 17:27 (ten years ago)
This is because he couldn't get any judges through before, right?
― Nhex, Thursday, 18 December 2014 17:31 (ten years ago)
so this might be Harry Reid's legacy
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 17:56 (ten years ago)
I have always wanted to see the empirical facts about all these marvelous Dem-appointed judges
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 18 December 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
I tend to conclude, based on evidence, that it's in the judiciary where Dems and the GOP appoint their more liberal and conservative rubber stamps.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 18:05 (ten years ago)
Quick unrelated question, needed for work: is following the US Congress or Senate debates free in the US? Is that C-Span, and does that come free for every US citizen with a basic telly or cable subscription? Ie. *not* in a package deal you need to pay extra for? Thanks in advance!
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:35 (ten years ago)
nothing is free in the US
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:36 (ten years ago)
You aren't kidding, are you?
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:40 (ten years ago)
it comes for free...with the cable package that you're expected to pay for every month in order to be a true american
― ♪♫_\o/_♫♪ (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:41 (ten years ago)
I'm not kidding. Cable subscriptions cost money. C-SPAN is part of basic cable though yes. Although it should be noted that C-Span is not just 24-7 congressional proceedings, and there is more than one C-Span channel. Also Congressional and Senate debates/hearings/vote proceedings are typically excruciatingly boring. You do get some instances where people do some ridiculous name calling/grandstanding/hyperbolizing, primarily committee hearings. And then there was Newtie's innovation of speaking to an empty chamber after hours while still making out like you were addressing an assembly - dunno if anyone does that anymore...
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:41 (ten years ago)
you were he was
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:42 (ten years ago)
you can also stream it online here for free...once you've authenticated your cable subscription package. you DO have a cable subscription package, don't you? if not you are very suspicious, frankly *dials department of homeland security*
― ♪♫_\o/_♫♪ (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:42 (ten years ago)
And then there was Newtie's innovation of speaking to an empty chamber after hours while still making out like you were addressing an assembly - dunno if anyone does that anymore...
oh, they do
― ♪♫_\o/_♫♪ (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:43 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:43 (ten years ago)
it is every american citizen's right to have the opportunity to watch their elected leaders conducting business, once the citizen has purchased a cable subscription package
― ♪♫_\o/_♫♪ (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:44 (ten years ago)
Gingrich made his reputation doing that shit.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:45 (ten years ago)
― Οὖτις,
freedom is free
Thanks guys, ZS in partic!
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:49 (ten years ago)
And Shakey
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Thursday, 18 December 2014 23:50 (ten years ago)
Now, getting a flag that flew atop the Capitol for 30 seconds, from your congressman, that's free.
― pplains, Friday, 19 December 2014 01:14 (ten years ago)
nothing is free in the US― Οὖτις, Thursday, December 18, 2014
― Οὖτις, Thursday, December 18, 2014
goddamn right. that's the way it should be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn5lEuiwtfQ
― Daniel, Esq 2, Friday, 19 December 2014 01:18 (ten years ago)
i remember when i was 17 hearing bill hicks talk about how he only really understood politics after getting high and watching c-span for 40 hours straight and thinking, oh, i guess i need to do that too. (i never did.)
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 19 December 2014 02:08 (ten years ago)
oh, Morbs:
The nuclear option also freed Obama to appoint some more liberal judges, including Nina Pillard to the D.C. Circuit, who drew comparisons to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — and faced GOP opposition — for her work on gender equality.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 December 2014 14:25 (ten years ago)
x-post-- there is also C-Span radio on the FM dial in Washington D.C. and online
http://series.c-span.org/C-SPAN-Radio/
― curmudgeon, Friday, 19 December 2014 15:09 (ten years ago)
From Politico:
As Republicans take control of Congress, they are bringing in veteran influence peddlers to help them run the show. Nearly a dozen veteran K Streeters have been named as top staffers to GOP leaders or on key committees as lawmakers prepare to take the gavel in January.
For instance, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell named Hazen Marshall policy director earlier this week. Marshall, a former staff director for the Senate Budget Committee, has spent the last 10 years as a lobbyist at the Nickles Group representing dozens of clients like AT&T, Comcast and energy company Exelon….
And while former staffers-turned lobbyists often end up back in public service — the revolving door has been swinging for years — there is a notable increase in the pace of K Streeters making the move back to Congress this month.
― curmudgeon, Friday, 19 December 2014 15:12 (ten years ago)
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/12/yeah-democrats-are-pretty-pro-corporate-too
― curmudgeon, Friday, 19 December 2014 15:25 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYGV8bdrHrk
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 19 December 2014 15:29 (ten years ago)
Being pro-corporate is one of the few bipartisan issues left in Congress.
covers a helluva lotta ground, doesn't it?
― things lose meaning over time (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 December 2014 15:50 (ten years ago)
BILL MOYERS: You talk about the vocal right. And there's a powerful movement that seems to like the way the country is going. That seems to think this is the way it ought to be and that Occupy Wall Street and Steve Fraser, and others, they just represent the malcontents of a system that is really working for them.STEVE FRASER: Yes. It is the consummate all embracing expression of the triumph of the free market ideology as the synonym for freedom. In other words, it used to be you could talk about freedom and the free market as distinct notions. Now, and for some time, since the age of Reagan began free market capitalism and freedom are conflated. They are completely married to each other. And we have, as a culture, bought into that idea. It's part of what I mean when I say the attenuating of any alternatives.BILL MOYERS: Is there any vision of an alternative society to the financial capitalism that's driving this?STEVE FRASER: Very, very little. The labor movement itself offers no such alternative. It is trying to defend its own very precarious existence and defend its shrinking numbers. Making valiant efforts to convince other unorganized working people that it might be to their immediate advantage to join the labor movement. But there's no alternative vision of a different kind of society.Let me give you a very interesting example, to me anyway. When the Cold War first broke out, and we faced the Soviet Union, we depicted ourselves as the free world, as we all know. And as that, as a slave empire, whatever you want to call it exactly. But actually we talked very little then about capitalism. We talked about freedom and the free world, but not so much about capitalism. Why? Because the country had just emerged out of the Great Depression. Capitalism didn't have a very high reputation in 1945 or 1950. People were still very skeptical about whether it could indeed serve the general welfare. Right?BILL MOYERS: It had failed. That's what led to--STEVE FRASER: And it failed in the most traumatic way. It's the second greatest trauma in our country's history next to the Civil War. Horrible. It ruined millions of lives. It is axiomatic in our current political culture that when we say freedom we mean capitalism. And that is an indication of how we have been, you know, there's a philosopher who said that language is the house of being. It's where we live. And if you're living in a language that's been denuded of some of its key furniture like certain concepts like that, you're homeless. You have no way, you have no way to challenge even when you're faced with wholesale larceny. I mean on the part of the major banking institutions. I mean what-- let's call a spade a spade. These were thieves. And yet the we lack the kind of linguistic wherewithal, which is much more, it's spiritual, to confront it.
STEVE FRASER: Yes. It is the consummate all embracing expression of the triumph of the free market ideology as the synonym for freedom. In other words, it used to be you could talk about freedom and the free market as distinct notions. Now, and for some time, since the age of Reagan began free market capitalism and freedom are conflated. They are completely married to each other. And we have, as a culture, bought into that idea. It's part of what I mean when I say the attenuating of any alternatives.
BILL MOYERS: Is there any vision of an alternative society to the financial capitalism that's driving this?
STEVE FRASER: Very, very little. The labor movement itself offers no such alternative. It is trying to defend its own very precarious existence and defend its shrinking numbers. Making valiant efforts to convince other unorganized working people that it might be to their immediate advantage to join the labor movement. But there's no alternative vision of a different kind of society.
Let me give you a very interesting example, to me anyway. When the Cold War first broke out, and we faced the Soviet Union, we depicted ourselves as the free world, as we all know. And as that, as a slave empire, whatever you want to call it exactly. But actually we talked very little then about capitalism. We talked about freedom and the free world, but not so much about capitalism. Why? Because the country had just emerged out of the Great Depression. Capitalism didn't have a very high reputation in 1945 or 1950. People were still very skeptical about whether it could indeed serve the general welfare. Right?
BILL MOYERS: It had failed. That's what led to--
STEVE FRASER: And it failed in the most traumatic way. It's the second greatest trauma in our country's history next to the Civil War. Horrible. It ruined millions of lives. It is axiomatic in our current political culture that when we say freedom we mean capitalism. And that is an indication of how we have been, you know, there's a philosopher who said that language is the house of being. It's where we live. And if you're living in a language that's been denuded of some of its key furniture like certain concepts like that, you're homeless. You have no way, you have no way to challenge even when you're faced with wholesale larceny. I mean on the part of the major banking institutions. I mean what-- let's call a spade a spade. These were thieves. And yet the we lack the kind of linguistic wherewithal, which is much more, it's spiritual, to confront it.
from an interesting conversation with Steve Fraser on the first and second gilded ages
― ♪♫_\o/_♫♪ (Karl Malone), Monday, 22 December 2014 18:43 (ten years ago)
http://pando.com/2014/12/18/the-war-nerd-more-proof-the-us-defense-industry-has-nothing-to-do-with-defending-america/
― Mordy, Tuesday, 23 December 2014 18:48 (ten years ago)
yeah that was good, you can tell he's really pissed off there
― some kind of terrible IDM with guitars (sleeve), Tuesday, 23 December 2014 18:50 (ten years ago)
House to be down one piece of shit
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/29/politics/michael-grimm-to-resign-soon/
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 December 2014 17:24 (ten years ago)
and wait for the majority whip to twist in the wind
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 December 2014 18:59 (ten years ago)
How will they ever replace him
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 December 2014 19:03 (ten years ago)
I take special pleasure in Grimm's downfall because his purported health-food restaurant where he was paying people off the books once screwed up my order three times in a night, after I argued with him on the phone about it
― Banned on the Run (benbbag), Wednesday, 31 December 2014 05:58 (ten years ago)
Some things never change:
Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, proposes a new $2,500 tax credit for families with children. But the most popular conservative idea for boosting incomes is overhauling corporate taxation. Mr. Obama has embraced that goal if Congress closes enough loopholes while lowering the 35 percent top rate to ensure the government will not lose revenue.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/30/us/politics/for-solution-to-income-stagnation-republicans-and-democrats-revise-their-playbooks.html?_r=0
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 31 December 2014 14:57 (ten years ago)
How are any play books being revised here
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 31 December 2014 16:33 (ten years ago)
speaking of, the new GOP senators-elect did their party crowd by voting to eliminate the food stamps program.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 December 2014 16:46 (ten years ago)
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/john-mccain-arizona-tea-party-113849.html
McCain reminds upstarts that he knew how to be an asshole before they did. Kinda love this story a lot
― The Complainte of Ray Tabano, Wednesday, 31 December 2014 18:27 (ten years ago)
WASHINGTON — James Risen, a New York Times reporter, will not be called to testify at a leak trial, lawyers said Monday, ending a seven-year legal fight over whether he could be forced to identify his confidential sources.
The Justice Department said in court filings that it would not call Mr. Risen to testify at the trial of Jeffrey Sterling, a former C.I.A. officer charged with providing him details about a botched operatio
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 01:51 (ten years ago)