"shake it off" is definitely her worst ever lead single. the rap :(
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:13 (eleven years ago)
wait did she really say something about jimmy jam & terry lewis???
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:14 (eleven years ago)
i did not hear it but i was shouting at my bf to shut up. but i think maura was making a joke
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:15 (eleven years ago)
oh :(
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:16 (eleven years ago)
"proper pop album" :(
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:17 (eleven years ago)
"shake it off" sounded very catchy but the spoken word/rap/"sick beat" bit made me do a full body cringe and I EXPECT BETTER FROM YOUUUUU TAYLOR
OTM
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:19 (eleven years ago)
oh it was a joke about 1989 i get it now
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:25 (eleven years ago)
i haven't heard this song yet but "we are never ever getting back together" is one of the three or four least greatest songs on red
i'm down
mystified by the single though
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:25 (eleven years ago)
it's a snappy lil number but v. indistinct and the rap is going to be hard to get over
― call all destroyer, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
I AM GETTING MJ VIBES AM I WRONG FOR THIS
I LOVE IT ALREADY DON'T CARE
I AM SURE THE ALBUM WILL HAVE MORE SWIFTIAN LYRICS
THIS. SICK.BEAT.
LOLLLLLLLLL
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)
There better be the sound of the Funky Drummer on this album.
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:28 (eleven years ago)
this is the kind of song that requires a killer middle-eight to elevate it from catchy ringtone into something truly POP and holy shit does the rap let it down
― sean gramophone, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:28 (eleven years ago)
oh fuck this song
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:29 (eleven years ago)
http://cdn02.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/headlines/2014/08/taylor-swift-1989-album-artwork.jpg
― een, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:29 (eleven years ago)
so down
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:30 (eleven years ago)
oh mywhat a inglorious tune
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:30 (eleven years ago)
The "rap" breakdown makes me think of Avril's Girlfiend.
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
THIS IS SO FUCKING GROOVY
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
i never miss a beattttt-ah!!!
these VOCALS ok girl
Liked it more on 2nd listen, not that hot on the vid tho
― Basically / I Don't Wanna Be / An mp3 / 3-2-0 kb / ps (Craigo Boingo), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
terrible
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:33 (eleven years ago)
I GO ON TOO MANY DATES
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:34 (eleven years ago)
confirmed that i can sing the hook without searching youtube
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
It feels very "pop for 2014" to me in that it sounds like it's made to appeal to the crowd that is suffereng from "EDM Fatigue" and that likes stuff like "Happy" and "All About That Bass".
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:37 (eleven years ago)
No thinkpieces about the video. Please.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:38 (eleven years ago)
yeah the jam/lewis thing was me writing real time fan fiction, sorry everybody
― maura, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:39 (eleven years ago)
singing at the top of my lungs
HEARTBREAKER'S GONNA BREAK BREAK BREAK BREAK BREAK
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
an electric pop anthem complete with the "Hey Ya" inspired horns that have taken music by storm this year
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
gimme just one track that's taylor-gone-latin freestyle and i'll be happy
― Merdeyeux, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
This pop song sounds like other pop songs shocker wtf
― Basically / I Don't Wanna Be / An mp3 / 3-2-0 kb / ps (Craigo Boingo), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:41 (eleven years ago)
There's some unfortunate twerking though.
― boxedjoy, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:41 (eleven years ago)
so can i, which somehow makes it worse
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:42 (eleven years ago)
the video is terrible
the "fakin' fakin' fakeeee" adlib near the end is KILLING me
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:42 (eleven years ago)
deep prayers for this one
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:42 (eleven years ago)
new charli xcx single > this
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:43 (eleven years ago)
getting Hey Ya vibes
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:44 (eleven years ago)
um
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:45 (eleven years ago)
third listen and i don't care / i love it
THEY'RE FAKIN' FAKIN' FAKEEEEEEEEEE
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:46 (eleven years ago)
my coworker's reaction is my favorite: "i feel like if i heard this when i was out and kinda drunk i'd be like yeeAAAAHHHH"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:47 (eleven years ago)
"haters gonna hate" is the most odious expression of the last 40 years so I'm not feeling generous
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:48 (eleven years ago)
yeah it's gonna be huge with the 'tonight's gonna be a good night' set
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:48 (eleven years ago)
also: pop stars really don't know what the fuck to do with horn sections besides treat them as rhythm guitars or something
The beat sounds a lot like the beat for "Happy," with the open hi-hat hit moved in the measure.
― Immediate Follower (NA), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:49 (eleven years ago)
I mean it's a pretty standard drum beat but it jumped out at me.
otm
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:50 (eleven years ago)
this is like everything i didn't even know i needed!!!
gonna assume her inspiration for the song's FUNK and album title came from her playing the 1975's "girls" incessantly on the streets of nyc this summer
― prolego, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:51 (eleven years ago)
this is about as ebullient as a cardiac arrest
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:51 (eleven years ago)
reserve the right to like this at any time but the song is totally megahan trainor's second single and the video looks like an snl sketch
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:52 (eleven years ago)
Yeah my immediate reaction was "wow this is the perfect midpoint between "happy" and "all about that bass" how timely."
This is part of the genius of max martin which stands apart from whether you like the results, his stylistic shifts are so utterly ruthless.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:53 (eleven years ago)
i'm surprised she went with something so ordinary
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:53 (eleven years ago)
I dunno, the same is true of "We Are Never...". The pop move last time made more sense once we heard the other Martin joints, retrospectively making the first single sound better.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:56 (eleven years ago)
I think I was in the minority here in recoiling at Red, precisely for how little Martin and Shellback and Swift have in common.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:56 (eleven years ago)
Out of the way too many songs around in the past couple years that sound like this one, this one has one of the best melodies. I just don't know what to do with the lyrics and the rap break, though.
― Everyone's a closet ned. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:57 (eleven years ago)
i mean from afar i should probs be slightly disappointed or w/e but then every single part of this song is a total earworm and makes me want to dance giddily and it is so funky and THEY'RE FAKIN' FAKIN' FAKEEEEEEEE
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:58 (eleven years ago)
the fella over there with the hella good hair
― struggle blogger (Andre Gunder Frank 3000), Monday, 18 August 2014 21:59 (eleven years ago)
It's not a rap. It's more like the "shit is bananas" bit from "Hollaback Girl". Though not as good as that obv.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 21:59 (eleven years ago)
I'm drinking a Soy latteI get a double shotIt goes right through my bodyAnd you knowI'm satisfied,I drive my mini cooperAnd I'm feeling super-dooperYo they tell I'm a trooper
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:00 (eleven years ago)
1989 is a touchstone; Taylor's songwriting and sonic evolution surprises us more than ever before. Heavily keyboard and beat driven, the pop sensibilities that have always been the hallmark of Taylor’s music now move front and center on 1989. "I spent two years making 1989. Two years gives you enough time to grow and change and let things inspire you. I was listening to a lot of late 80's pop music and how bold those songs were and how that time period was a time of limitless possibilities. In thinking about that, this album is a rebirth for me. This is my very first documented, official pop album. 1989 is the most sonically cohesive album I have ever made and my favorite album I have ever made," said Taylor.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:01 (eleven years ago)
(Formal press release action)
I mean I'm totally cool with Swift recording a Fine Young Cannibals album or Cosmic Thing
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:01 (eleven years ago)
some of you should look away now lol
http://oi59.tinypic.com/ncxvk9.jpg
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:01 (eleven years ago)
well "we are never" was hyper-pop but it still sounded like her. it was a pretty easy bridge to envision, and i think the same is true for "22" if not exactly "i knew you were trouble"
maybe i'm just feeling weird about there being no twangy guitar trojan horse-ing the new sounds in
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:01 (eleven years ago)
yeah it's not a rap
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:02 (eleven years ago)
NO FUCKING WAY
― prolego, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:02 (eleven years ago)
"For the record this is my very first documented pop album," she added.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:03 (eleven years ago)
Taylor Swift & Ryan Tedder
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:03 (eleven years ago)
she used an ampersand
this is a well written song, the hook is good. i just think the beat is ugly and cheap sounding and a bit too on the nose.
if this sounded like "stay stay stay" i'd be down
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:04 (eleven years ago)
girl if you're going to be evoking the year that pop gave us like a prayer and raw like sushi and rhythm nation 1814 and hats you gotta come a bit harder than ryan bloody tedder
― prolego, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:04 (eleven years ago)
Haha
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:04 (eleven years ago)
if your last name is "Antonoff" you should probably go by "John"
― een, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:05 (eleven years ago)
Taylor Swift recording a Daisy Age album
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:05 (eleven years ago)
The way she describes her inspiration I'd expect this to sound like HAIM, but there is no way. Be cool if it sounded like Paula Abdul, though.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:05 (eleven years ago)
She should collabo with Stephen Bray.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:05 (eleven years ago)
a taylor swift / fred schneider duet would actually rule
― struggle blogger (Andre Gunder Frank 3000), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:05 (eleven years ago)
If she had a huskier voice I'd suggest she hook up with Patrick Leonard.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
GUYS
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, August 18, 2014 6:05 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark
"shake it off" doesn't *not* sound like haim
i'm kind of hoping it's a bunch of songs that sound like "ain't it fun"
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
this thread moved from disgust to the ilm brand of contrarian popist embrace in hyperspeed
― een, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:06 (eleven years ago)
YEAH JORDAN
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:07 (eleven years ago)
This is going to be her biggest single, no? Smart move! I don't love the song/video but good on her for going straight to the heart of the will-spend-money-on-music-demographic
― faghetti (fgti), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:07 (eleven years ago)
I'd be down with Swift continuing in this vein. Like, "1955" could be her rockabilly record, "1977" her punk record, "1994" her Disney soundtrack, "1969" her West Coast psychedelic album...
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:08 (eleven years ago)
for whatever reason i'm intrigued by taylor + jack antonoff
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:09 (eleven years ago)
"2009" brings in the Animal Collective influence...
― Number None, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:09 (eleven years ago)
I've never been intrigued by Jack Antonoff.
― Everyone's a closet ned. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:10 (eleven years ago)
he cowrote "sweeter than fiction" if you'd like to be less intrigued
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:11 (eleven years ago)
and ryan tedder created "hold on" by colbie caillat which is the greatest song of all time
IN TAYLOR I TRUST
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:12 (eleven years ago)
I'd rather have "1994" be her Tarantino Soundtrack.
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:12 (eleven years ago)
people have elevated ryan tedder material before
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:12 (eleven years ago)
because if you place the material at ground level, brad, you suffocate
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:13 (eleven years ago)
haha
― Everyone's a closet ned. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:14 (eleven years ago)
Also I feel like prolego and uberweiss's definition of FUNK is very different from mine.
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:19 (eleven years ago)
lol alfred
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:19 (eleven years ago)
The single is OK I guess. But one thing for sure I don't wanna be caught listening to it by my friends. Haven't said this regarding a Taylor song before :(
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:23 (eleven years ago)
well "we are never" was hyper-pop but it still sounded like her
yeah WANEGBT sounded like knowing self-parody (well, initially it just sounded like self-parody i guess). "shake it off" sounds like anyfuckingone else.
also even one or two more shiny ~pop joints on red would have completely sunk it, and there were only like 3 in the first place. doesn't look like that ratio will be true of 1989 :/
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:25 (eleven years ago)
w/e MarkoP you know this is better than peak MJ
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:28 (eleven years ago)
the cinematography of this video is gross
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:30 (eleven years ago)
"22" kinda underperformed, so i'm a little surprised/intrigued that she's doubling down on letting her young fans know she's older than them
― da croupier, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:32 (eleven years ago)
as much as i'm down, very much stated that i'm down with the direction of this record itt, i wish nathan chapman were involved
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:36 (eleven years ago)
share j0rd's misgivings about the cheap sound of the beat, max martin's got a very narrow "horn" synth preset
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:39 (eleven years ago)
you know who else made a wacky video about not being able to dance? genesis
― da croupier, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:42 (eleven years ago)
you know who made a better cheerleader cheer? The Jonas Bros.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:42 (eleven years ago)
http://portalpopline.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/taylorswift-cht.jpghttp://i.ytimg.com/vi/qOyF4hR5GoE/hqdefault.jpg
― da croupier, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:43 (eleven years ago)
Irritated this is bad bc i just, this week, learned to love Taylor Swift.
― Treeship, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:44 (eleven years ago)
hey, nathan chapman could still have produced track #11 maybe!
― uberweiss, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:45 (eleven years ago)
feel like late '80s/early '90s pop had its fake synth horns more kaleidoscopically arranged at least
can only think of "every heartbeat" at the moment though
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:45 (eleven years ago)
hope a song on this sounds like "every heartbeat"
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/playing-possum-19750619
With Playing Possum, Simon has largely abandoned plaintive balladeering for a blunt style that means to be aggressively sexy. Aggressive it is — and characteristically ingratiating — but not particularly sexy except on one song, "Attitude Dancing." Easily the most exciting Carly Simon cut since "You're So Vain," "Attitude Dancing" boasts nifty nonsense lyrics by Jacob Brackman and one of Richard Perry's tour de force productions: strutting horns, razorsharp string lines, perfect backup vocals by various luminaries and Jim Gordon's impeccable, essential drumming. Simon's vocal is genuinely sassy; she even lets herself growl a bit.
― da croupier, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
Simon's new, bolder stance was probably inevitable — it's certainly welcome — since her previous four albums have defined a slow but steady movement away from the "sensitive singer/songwriter" role toward that of "rock" songstress.
― da croupier, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:49 (eleven years ago)
tell me this is on spotify soon, i can't listen to real songs yet
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:50 (eleven years ago)
― uberweiss, Monday, August 18, 2014 6:12 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
oh nice to meet you, i'm the other guy in the world who likes that song
tedder still best treated with suspicion though
― some dude, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:50 (eleven years ago)
songstress
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:51 (eleven years ago)
LOL: https://mobile.twitter.com/CountryMusic/status/501483161101279232
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:56 (eleven years ago)
i haven't even bothered to put this on my ipod :/
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 August 2014 22:57 (eleven years ago)
so it's long enough
We need a backlash
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 22:58 (eleven years ago)
it started off with a backlash!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:35 (eleven years ago)
i'm home now so i can dance with my cats to this as taylor intended
the cats will not comment
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:36 (eleven years ago)
they're extremely frightened
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:36 (eleven years ago)
to be real i think taylor's sensibility is extremely visible in the vocal it's just been floated over to different production
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:38 (eleven years ago)
hey
― markers, Monday, 18 August 2014 23:42 (eleven years ago)
i might buy a physical copy of this, which would be crazy considering i don't do that
― markers, Monday, 18 August 2014 23:43 (eleven years ago)
this is p fun, im down
― johnny crunch, Monday, 18 August 2014 23:45 (eleven years ago)
brad's got a cat for you, start dancing
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:45 (eleven years ago)
he better have enough for all of us. loan me one!
― markers, Monday, 18 August 2014 23:56 (eleven years ago)
http://ceripadley.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/crazycat.gif
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:57 (eleven years ago)
true
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 18 August 2014 23:59 (eleven years ago)
brad, can I come over with some gin do you have cats
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:00 (eleven years ago)
Holy fucking shit
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:05 (eleven years ago)
This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We Are Never Ever I Can't Even Remember The Rest Of The Name Of That Song
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, August 18, 2014 5:48 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
I see where you're coming from but it is what it is
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:06 (eleven years ago)
so the song impacted you then
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:08 (eleven years ago)
Decided to action that post after listen-hearing the songmusic
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:10 (eleven years ago)
Strangely enough the comeback single that this most reminds me of is "Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na)"
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:11 (eleven years ago)
I am so excited about
http://i.imgur.com/2zysVFA.jpg
Tho
On first listen it doesn't irritate me the way "We Are Never" did on first listen -- but "We Are Never" grew on me and (for better/worse) had more identifiably Taylor touches than this does. So I dunno. I do agree with this:
... because as I was listening ambivalently I thought, "Well, one of her killer bridges could elevate this," and then there was the opposite of a killer bridge.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:20 (eleven years ago)
have you seen the bridge?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:21 (eleven years ago)
Those gated hi hats (I think that's what they're called) gave me a nice http://i.imgur.com/iHHBUZ1.png scare
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:28 (eleven years ago)
Yeah I thought of "Umbrella" as well, though that comparison paints this in a pretty unflattering light.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:42 (eleven years ago)
Eh the comparison for me ended after the horn patch started playing
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 00:46 (eleven years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, August 18, 2014 5:48 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
Do agree that she should have taken the message of the song to heart and gone Full Skammunism
Right now imagining Taylor Swift doing the Save Ferris version of Come On Eileen and I am besides myself
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:03 (eleven years ago)
aaah a better chorus and this would have been one of the pop songs for the ages, and i've always considered Swift's forte was big anthemic fun choruses. i was waiting for it and it never really happened, i really want to enjoy this song.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
Taylor Swift - 1996 (her SkaCore album)
― Randall "Humble" Pie (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:06 (eleven years ago)
Taylor Swift - 1999 (her Prince covers album)
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:36 (eleven years ago)
1999 is her nu-metal album
xpost shit fuck ass piss goddammit
― Neanderthal, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:40 (eleven years ago)
that's not how "family reunion" goes
― markers, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:43 (eleven years ago)
this song's gonna be a big hit
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 02:24 (eleven years ago)
i love this song
wonder if any of the involved parties have ever heard "bubble pop"
― james brooks, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 05:12 (eleven years ago)
ok, so the song is two times better without the video. anyone wants to predict thesinglesjukebox's score?
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 08:47 (eleven years ago)
LOL: https://mobile.twitter.com/CountryMusic/status/501483161101279232― lex pretend, Monday, August 18, 2014 3:56 PM (Yesterday)
― lex pretend, Monday, August 18, 2014 3:56 PM (Yesterday)
what did this say, seems to have been deleted?
― alpine static, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 08:59 (eleven years ago)
uh no, "bubble pop" is 10x the song this is, bad dubstep interlude >>> bad taylor swift rapping. xposts
― Roz, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:02 (eleven years ago)
this is terrible, but I can already tell it's going to be massive
― Roz, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:04 (eleven years ago)
xpostshttp://imagizer.imageshack.com/img540/9408/hOFX7U.png
― jay., Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:36 (eleven years ago)
that's sweet
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:42 (eleven years ago)
"This sick beat" rivals "Now go stand in the corner and think about what you did" for cringe inducage.
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:53 (eleven years ago)
i woke up this morning and all I really felt like playing was "mean"
they're similar in sentiment and this works as a continuation/fulfillment of what she was singing about there but back then she was taking shots as a small-town girl taking refuge in a fantasy of what the future could one day bring - one day i'll be living in a big old city/i'll be big enough so you can't hit me etc. - and now she's got out and escaped to the biggest of cities the dynamics feel different. do you really need to sing about haters when the world's now at your feet? it felt bratty in mean but at least that felt like an uncertain defence mechanism against bigger forces. this is being heavily positioned as her big city nyc album that she's been driving towards since her debut (that small town a thousand miles away in her rear view mirror now) and i like how she talked in the livestream about her inspiration from late 80s nyc bohemian freedom, doing whatever you want and loving who you want (i have too many #queertaylorthoughts) i just hope she has some serious songwriting about dealing with all that doesn't only just feel like a victory lap. and i hope her identity isn't subsumed too much by max martin. 9/16 songs is an awful lot.
― prolego, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 09:54 (eleven years ago)
she talked in the livestream about her inspiration from late 80s nyc bohemian freedom doing whatever you want and loving who you want
wow
― zombie formalist (m coleman), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 11:04 (eleven years ago)
that video is like watching your grown-up kid make unfortunate choices
― zombie formalist (m coleman), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 11:09 (eleven years ago)
plus as a bald man the thing about the "hella good hair" just hurts.
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 11:16 (eleven years ago)
song sounds even worse in the cold light of day. oh god, even apart from the obviously terrible bits like the spoken word/rap and the horrible video, the lyrics are so basic. the woman who wrote "tim mcgraw" at 16 is resorting to scavenging through katy perry's bin for rejected lyric sheets??
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 11:33 (eleven years ago)
i mean yeah i was not enthused by WANEGBT on first listen for similar reasons but this is a hundred times worse
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 11:34 (eleven years ago)
I'll just give her the benefit of the doubt and assume those lyrics were written entirely by max martin or whoever the producer was. I mean,
I stay up too late, got nothing in my brainThat’s what people say, that’s what people sayI go on too many dates, but I can’t make them stayAt least that’s what people say, that’s what people say
seriously..
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:00 (eleven years ago)
there is no way "I go on too many dates, but I can’t make them stay" was written for anyone in music besides taylor swift, and likely *by* swift, given how much shit she's taken from tabloids for exactly that
― katherine, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:09 (eleven years ago)
IDK, they feel like her lyrics. It isn't rigid / perfect in that max martin sort of way. There's awkward numbers of syllables.
And yeah, unapologetically basic is the new aesthetic.
― Popture, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:11 (eleven years ago)
here for unapologetically basic anything/everything
― james brooks, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:13 (eleven years ago)
I go on too many dates*trademark knowing chuckle*but I can’t make them stay
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:13 (eleven years ago)
Earl Sweatshirt Slams Taylor Swift for “Inherently Offensive” Video
― ambient yacht god (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:30 (eleven years ago)
the taylor swift video is offensive but anyone in odd future can sit alllll the way down given that "being offensive" is their entire fucking shtick
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:32 (eleven years ago)
Loving the big echo-ey MUAH's!
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:44 (eleven years ago)
should i buy keds, guys?
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 12:50 (eleven years ago)
gotta say, if you take out the problematic bits then the video's really fun to watch
― cerealbar, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 13:57 (eleven years ago)
this is basically taylor swift wanting her very own 'Problem', isn't it?
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
taylor's manager a few months ago in an interview was talking about how best to avoid ariana's "ascendancy" release as if she were her chief competition
I guess with the max martin productions that's where they see her right now
― prolego, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 14:11 (eleven years ago)
*and release schedule
― prolego, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 14:12 (eleven years ago)
I listened to this, and my youngest daughter, in another room, was humming it when I got back into the room. "what was that?" she asked, and I explained. "it's not very good," she replied, then continued humming it.
― Euler, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 14:16 (eleven years ago)
Getting a strong Avril meets Fergie vibe with a "I think everyone forgot about Hey Ya!" twist. Or that video for "Intuition" by Jewel; anyone remember that?
The strangest thing is this whole "It's so 80's!" undercurrent. I understand that half of the people writing these pieces were probably born in the early 90's, but like, there is absolutely nothing 80's about this song.
― Tomás Piñon (Ryan), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 15:56 (eleven years ago)
^otm.
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:41 (eleven years ago)
Like maybe I can hear a little Belinda Carlisle or something in the melodies, but this is firmly a mid-2000s joint.
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:44 (eleven years ago)
The only 80's tune I can think of any resembelance is Toni Basil's Mickey, and that's probably only for the chearleader-esque chant part. But definitely not anything from the year of the album title.
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:48 (eleven years ago)
the people who mention "late '80s" are likely doing so because taylor herself brought it up in the presser, as far as I can tell. this isn't that, though. it's pure disneypop -- jobros' "pom poms," bella thorne's "call it whatever," nods to "dancing on my own" and "come on over baby"
― katherine, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:52 (eleven years ago)
there's also the fact that the video is so so so so phil collins
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:01 (eleven years ago)
he liked a twerpy horn section on the uptempo stuff too
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
phil collins? more like high school musical
― katherine, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:05 (eleven years ago)
any superstar who makes a wacky video where they prance around in front of a variety of pop archetypes as if they don't belong there owe phil a royalty
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:06 (eleven years ago)
but this ain't a binary, yes this max martin pop resembles disney pop and yes this superstar horn-fueled tomfoolery resembles phil collins
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
it is funny how "Mickey" has become this singular touchstone that Gwen and Avril and the JoBros and now Taylor have all kind of used for YAY CHEERLEADERS '80S POP YEAH shorthand
― some dude, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoTz3WgZm4c
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
xpost -- Does that make Nirvana the exception that proves the rule?
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:09 (eleven years ago)
more like "jerk it off"
― ienjoyhotdogs, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
more like "ienjoysnotclogs"
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
to be fair that horn section was earth wind & fire
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:39 (eleven years ago)
Or that video for "Intuition" by Jewel; anyone remember that?
"First documented pop album" made me immediately think of
http://www.jewelwiki.com/uploads/Albums/0304/0304-front.jpg
― the one where, as balls alludes (Eazy), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:45 (eleven years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, August 19, 2014 5:39 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
womp womp
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:46 (eleven years ago)
pretend i said "chipper" instead of "twerpy"
i was always under the impression he recorded the horn charts himself while wearing a variety of funny hats
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:47 (eleven years ago)
i mean that's just part of his artistry, that he gives you that impression
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:49 (eleven years ago)
http://res.cloudinary.com/dyfxt8ggh/image/upload/c_scale,h_377/v1381843804/Patrick_Bateman_Christian_Bale__You_like_Phil_Collins_American_Psycho_2000_film_daqwex.jpg
― Welcome to my spooooooky carnival! Hope I don't... blow your mind! (Phil D.), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 17:55 (eleven years ago)
― some dude, Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:07 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i watched Five Easy Pieces the other day and Toni Basil was listed as being in the movie according to the opening credits but i never spotted her
― ruffalo soldier (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 18:04 (eleven years ago)
She's the less butch lesbian hitchhiker.
― Randall "Humble" Pie (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 18:10 (eleven years ago)
Basil also plays the New Orleans hooker who isn't Karen Black in Easy Rider.
― Randall "Humble" Pie (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
this isn't as bad as i thought it would be from ppl's descriptions but still... yikes. the video is horrible.
― dyl, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:00 (eleven years ago)
― da croupier, Tuesday, August 19, 2014 1:06 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://planetmcal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/david-lee-roth-just-a-gigilo-310x168.jpg
― maura, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:25 (eleven years ago)
but i keep cruuuuising
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:27 (eleven years ago)
Toni Basil also choreographed Talking Heads a bit.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:31 (eleven years ago)
maybe don't click on this link if you're a taylor swift fan.
https://twitter.com/Tayswiftsong/status/501737788484882432
:///////////
i think i'd do anything to relive the news ed sheeran would be on red 2 years ago now
― prolego, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:32 (eleven years ago)
:(((((((((((
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
Come back, Snow Patrol guy, all is forgiven.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
forgot "just a gigolo" but it's funny where taylor and phil like to suggest they're more approachable and grounded than the pop scenarios they mock, david's just mocking - he's the host
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:39 (eleven years ago)
Her next album will be all duets.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:44 (eleven years ago)
my favorite song on the last record is "holy ground," bring it on
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:45 (eleven years ago)
I already heard this song out in the wild today when I went to grab lunch.
― Everyone's a closet ned. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:46 (eleven years ago)
How were yr fries
http://i.imgur.com/lUDm9pk.jpg
― 龜, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:48 (eleven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDAPwdHKmO4
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:49 (eleven years ago)
boohooplenty more years for classic swift ballads down the road and we've already had plenty. i'm excited about this current phase!
she did say 'heartthrob' is one of her favourite albums of all time
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
heard it on the radio back-to-back with Katy's "This Is How We Do," was like dueling horrible spoken word bridges
― some dude, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:51 (eleven years ago)
yeah i was like "this doesn't strike me as different from the approach taken on heartthrob"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 20:54 (eleven years ago)
Not devastated considering most of my least favorite Taylor songs are slow (except Change and Haunted)Oh and I'm actually really happy with Shake It Off. Too early to say, but it may surpass 22 and my favourite MM song she's done.
― jay., Tuesday, 19 August 2014 21:00 (eleven years ago)
Isn't the last song on the album an Imogen Heap co-write? Can't imagine that being an upbeat bop
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 22:53 (eleven years ago)
http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/haters-keep-hating-taylor-swifts-shake-it-off-will-take-over-the-world/
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:07 (eleven years ago)
i love when people break out a big prop crystal ball to make the bold prediction that Taylor Swift will gasp continue to be hugely successful
― some dude, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:11 (eleven years ago)
song's gonna be huge but alienating not just the country crowd but the wee ones with an album of pop songs flaunting twentysomething-hood does have some commercial risk
maybe she'll let florida georgia line do their magic mike thing as an opening act
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:18 (eleven years ago)
we can cry New Jersey all we want but at this rate any inevitable drop in sales would probably be a minor "Like A Prayer sold less than True Blue" kind of nitpicking.
― some dude, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:27 (eleven years ago)
yeah i don't see her going away or anything
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:31 (eleven years ago)
even if she dropped a full-on Erotica, like Madonna she'd have a soundtrack ballad out within six months
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:33 (eleven years ago)
oh god the horror
― dyl, Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:51 (eleven years ago)
hope a song on this sounds like "every heartbeat"― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, August 18, 2014 3:45 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, August 18, 2014 3:45 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Man, when I tell you she was cool, she was red hot, I mean she was (intheblanks), Tuesday, 19 August 2014 23:58 (eleven years ago)
Seriously. Like, Lady Gaga has been demonstrably unsuccesful for the past couple of years - disappointing sales, low or no-charting singles - and yet she remains a huge star. I don't know what it would take these days to knock someone who sells millions and sells out stadiums down a few pegs.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:33 (eleven years ago)
well by what metric are you saying "huge star" because in terms of selling millions gaga has been knocked down a few pegs
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:36 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, but no one can tell.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:38 (eleven years ago)
She's a household name that sells out huge venues that attracts broad and diverse crowds.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:39 (eleven years ago)
if you're saying "but she still gets to wear funny clothes on award shows and tour" well jeepers give it a minute, cyndi lauper could still go gold on album number 3 too
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:40 (eleven years ago)
Just saying by pretty much any standard Gaga is a star on her original terms - no country crossover remake etc. - and that's after several setbacks.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:41 (eleven years ago)
her considerably underperforming third album is less than a year old, dude! people don't just evaporate
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:42 (eleven years ago)
it's not like you have a few whiffed singles and suddenly you can't even do a t-mobile ad
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:43 (eleven years ago)
― Man, when I tell you she was cool, she was red hot, I mean she was (intheblanks),
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:43 (eleven years ago)
I've actually wondered how many whiffs it takes to de-star a superstar. It seems like at a certain point you're pretty much set for life.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:51 (eleven years ago)
even more so in the internet age
― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 00:53 (eleven years ago)
Well yeah cyndi Lauper has a tony and vanilla ice is big in drywalling or something but trust me they went down a few pegs. You may not "de-star" but you can down-star.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 01:10 (eleven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:51 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the answer is artpop
― katherine, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 01:21 (eleven years ago)
(i.e. one large whiff, usually at album time)
― katherine, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 01:56 (eleven years ago)
I bet it tastes lovely though.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 02:10 (eleven years ago)
like chicken
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 02:14 (eleven years ago)
Sorry if this is obvious - goes to Alfred's post yesterday. "Horns" sound intentionally dinky/one-note as, like, goofiness. Wouldn't necessarily affect whether someone likes it or not, but I don't think it was an effort to get real with a horn section.
― timellison, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 03:38 (eleven years ago)
the horns feel beside the point to me, the organ/synth (?) under the chorus is the only thing that makes me think the song could seriously grow on me
― some dude, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 03:55 (eleven years ago)
Wondering Sound roundtable includes our lex:
http://www.wonderingsound.com/feature/taylor-swift-shake-it-off-review-conversation/
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 13:50 (eleven years ago)
is that supposed to be a reason to click that link
― markers, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
lex aside, that was some of the worst writing i've ever read about taylor swift. have these people listened to her albums or just checked out some of her videos?
couldn't facepalm enough about bringing beyoncé out of no where into this. i know music critics are still not over bey dropping her album outta nowhere ppl love pitting women against each other but this has got nothing to do with her
― prolego, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
nah it's a legit point to mention how two global pop stars react to the male gaze.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:03 (eleven years ago)
huh I thought that was a good discussion :shrugs:
― jaymc, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:04 (eleven years ago)
the idea that the video is a stab at beyoncé am attempt to reaffirm pop queen status after BEYONCÉ was just total sub-Stan Wars level shit
― prolego, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:07 (eleven years ago)
*or an
― prolego, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:08 (eleven years ago)
I agree with their general assessment of this song but completely disagree with a lot of their reasoning and their view of Taylor as a whole. And yeah, the Beyonce mention was out of left-field and not really relevant.
Grasping At Straws: A Roundtable Exercise
― Greer, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:17 (eleven years ago)
Not gonna read a roundtable (my social media feeds and this thread will be roundtable plenty thanks) but i don't think it's totally Stan Wars to see this video as an attempt to undercut artists who show more effort than her in regards to choreography, costuming, etc (with a more direct gaga tweak than beyonce). A light-hearted one, but definitely a calculated approachability move.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:17 (eleven years ago)
yea there are def some tone deaf points in that discussion
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:20 (eleven years ago)
I agree with this excerpt from a Hopper response:
In a strange way, her dancing with them is maybe a modicum “better” than Taylor tunneling out from underneath these legs and looking up with this smirk, like “Isn’t this wacky? I don’t even understand? This is so not me.” That smirk highlights the chasm between the guileless white pop star playing dress-up with her Cuban link chains and the capable brown ass shaking above her. It’s a really cheap move that plays on the historic, racist mythology about black women’s sexuality in order to underscore her own.
although I'd say "It’s a really cheap move that plays on the historic, racist mythology about black women’s sexuality in order to quash her own." She lets the dancers do the work of parodying the Lily Allens and Miley Cyruses.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:26 (eleven years ago)
xxp i think that's misreading things. if she's positioning herself against anyone here it's against those she views as too self-conscious to try and dance ("the cool kids" in 22), not those who try too hard! she *loves* dancing (see any award show she's ever attended) and although she knows she's rubbish at it she's being taking classes to improve for some time now so as to incorporate it into her live shows
― prolego, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:43 (eleven years ago)
You can say you love to dance and still make a mockery of those who are good at it by prancing around in front of them sloppily with you as the focal point. It's more of a "hooray being yourself" than a "fuck coordinated people" gesture obv, but the undercutting is there just as much as it was in Phil Collins videos.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:48 (eleven years ago)
Still extremely confused by these Phil Collins references
― 龜, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:50 (eleven years ago)
If you say "I can't do that, golly I'm just me" in an advertisement for yourself, you're clearly saying that not being the things you're prancing in front aren't necessary efforts to make
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:51 (eleven years ago)
See the videos for "don't lose my number" "I can't dance" etc. Phil made a lot of lighthearted videos about the absurdity of himself as a pop figure while promoting himself as such.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:52 (eleven years ago)
No, yr not. xpost
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:53 (eleven years ago)
Again I'm not accusing her of malice, just canny self-marketing.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:55 (eleven years ago)
I think yr accusing her of being Taylor Swift making a video in mid2014 and that's precisely the extent of her crimes
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:57 (eleven years ago)
Sorry alb but you outed yourself as a hater recently so I'm gonna have to shake you off
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 14:59 (eleven years ago)
The video treats dance the way it treats race. As something you don't have to be concerned about understanding because the only important thing is me. The theme is Unapologetically Basic and it comes across as irksome the way wilful ignorance from people of privilege always does.
― Popture, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
Also as a promo video no? (I shd prb see it I guess)
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 15:31 (eleven years ago)
wait have you not even heard the song? did you not get my delicious reference to it? were you just scrolling around ilx, saw people were talking about cultural subtext in a creative work and decided you had to tell them they were wrong?
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:09 (eleven years ago)
Course I've heard the song, and seen a million stills. Don't think I saw/got yr delicious ref tho
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:16 (eleven years ago)
oh see this is a song about shaking off haters and you're dismissing my take on this video you haven't seen after recently announcing you've hated my presence on ilx for a decade so i made a delicious reference to you being a hater and shaking you off
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:22 (eleven years ago)
are you sure you've heard this song? i can't believe you'd miss that
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:23 (eleven years ago)
I just hated yr poppunk , not you for a decade! I should've noticed that tho, yeah. I don't actually like this song much, makes it hard to listen to too much/pay attention to
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:29 (eleven years ago)
*thing
dude i can't believe you're going to make me quote yr hatorade but
God da croupier yr schtick is a billion times more predictable and boring than hers, fuck off and come back w more insights into how pop punk ws amazing and ceaselessly trying to lol a messageboard is worthwhile
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Saturday, August 2, 2014 10:20 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Hey it's been like 12 years of this, a man can only read so much
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Saturday, August 2, 2014 10:24 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:32 (eleven years ago)
and it was following a lorde lyric homage not an appreciation of pop-punk. haven't written one of those since the aughts!
anyway see the video then tell people they're thinking too hard
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:33 (eleven years ago)
Oh yeah. Well, sorry. I like Lorde and I guess it revived memories, whatever. Sorry AM.
xpost I am clearly frightened of the video bt will try and see it tomorrow
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 16:39 (eleven years ago)
is now a good time for me to say that my overall reaction to the video, which mostly features extremely rich celebrity musician Taylor Swift dancing very poorly in front of a bunch of mostly-anonymous professional dancers who make much less money than her, fit directly into the authenticity-based arguments that people generally use to describe their Swift fandom (she writes her own songs, she plays her own instruments, she's singing about her own experiences, she's taking her specifics and making them relatable to others) and that this was maybe the most hilariously honest portrayal of Taylor Swift, multi-continent sensation, I've seen to date
like, aside from one or two songs, I've always felt like she's been ineptly prancing in front of my face, and now she's released a video that's mostly her ineptly prancing in my face, and it's kind of hilarious
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
she's making a more aggressive foray into pop qua pop (she's already hugely pop, so it's more of a framing thing) and this video gives her a chance to acknowledge her insecurities (that she'll never be a good dancer, never be one of the cool kids) while trying to frame it in relatable terms (all the jus' folks dancing with her and the band). while her "lol butts" joke is less contemptuous than lily allen's and less co-opting than miley's (i'm sure it was a conscious choice to also have her goofin on ballerinas, gaga shit, not just hip-hop, etc), it's still self-promotion at the expense of the owners of said butts.
the reason i keep mentioning phil collins is cuz he's another guy who's obviously succeeded on his own terms (don't really want to debate whether either of them are good, they're obv good at roping folks in) but still felt the need to head off potential criticism in relation to his pop peers in a similar fashion, and similarly came off like a bit of normcore douche
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
closed out of the roundtable page when i read "David Turner misses when pop was about the music." [sry if that person posts here or something]
― dyl, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:06 (eleven years ago)
peak phil collins is about twenty times as good as peak taylor swift, though i doubt taylor swift's career will more likely burn out than fade away into a dusty collection of artifacts from the alamo.
― LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:07 (eleven years ago)
i doubt i think!
i'm curious how she'll navigate her market changes but based on the evidence to date she's madonna-level canny, and while phil lasted impressively long on the pop charts for a balding drummer he got a far later start than she did so i don't think she's going anywhere
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:10 (eleven years ago)
when phil was taylor's age he was still doing one-or-less song a genesis album and staring at peter gabriel's butt on stage
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:14 (eleven years ago)
I love Taylor Swift music. I love pop music. Is this is Swift's vision of pop music, I'd rather have her ditching it altogether and going back to country.
That being said, I wasn't too enthralled with WANGBT when it first came out, and then Red came and it was so good that the semi-disappointing single was enhanced by all the other great songs around it in the album. So I'd like to hear 1989 before jumping into any conclusion.
― cpl593H, Thursday, 21 August 2014 14:08 (eleven years ago)
"shake it off" is definitely her worst ever lead single. the rap :(― lex pretend, Monday, August 18, 201
― go ahead. make vid where u rap about this new TMNT movie. (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 21 August 2014 16:30 (eleven years ago)
I love this song. I am currently not concerned about understanding dance, though.
― Peeking at Peak Petty (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 21 August 2014 20:06 (eleven years ago)
it's like that great lee ann womack song, "I hope you dance (as long as you've had lessons)"
― Peeking at Peak Petty (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 21 August 2014 20:11 (eleven years ago)
heard it on the radio today!
― markers, Friday, 22 August 2014 02:27 (eleven years ago)
cuz markers gonna mark, mark, mark, mark, mark
― Peeking at Peak Petty (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 22 August 2014 02:38 (eleven years ago)
― da croupier, Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:14 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Also being one of the great rock drummers of the 70s iirc
― ruffalo soldier (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 22 August 2014 03:15 (eleven years ago)
seriously, i'm not much a Collins stan at all, but that's the most reductive description i've ever read of his 70s work
― Bus Sex Teen Busted After Queef Beef (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 22 August 2014 17:30 (eleven years ago)
think croup just meant that he wasn't the front man
― Peeking at Peak Petty (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 22 August 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
Long interview in which taylor says she identifies as feminist http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/aug/23/taylor-swift-shake-it-off
― abcfsk, Saturday, 23 August 2014 19:25 (eleven years ago)
ty!
― markers, Saturday, 23 August 2014 19:31 (eleven years ago)
It would be wrong to express my regret if anyone is offended by my description of phil Collins' level of stardom and singer/songwriter experience at 25
― da croupier, Saturday, 23 August 2014 20:13 (eleven years ago)
I think at this point as many people owe Phil Collins an apology as believe he owes *them* an apology. It's a wash. But i will say, singing at your kid's school band recital seems like something T. Swift is destined for in 30 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Jmc6TZ5Guw
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 23 August 2014 20:28 (eleven years ago)
she's destined to have children and accept a request to spice up their school recital? what an awful fate.
― da croupier, Saturday, 23 August 2014 20:36 (eleven years ago)
didn't watch the clip, so if he just stumbled on stage screaming "y'all know sussudio?" then i can understand it being sad
― da croupier, Saturday, 23 August 2014 20:37 (eleven years ago)
Collins was seven miles northeast of me?! fuuuuck
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:18 (eleven years ago)
If Taylor doesn't have kids in 30 years I'm sure she'll be cool with performing at any kid's school band recital.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 23 August 2014 21:29 (eleven years ago)
i really liked the snl performance. the beat sounds pretty dinky on the recorded version so i think the fuller live sound really helped out.
sort of made me think that the song would've been much better if it was recorded by mark ronson instead of max martin.
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 25 August 2014 15:28 (eleven years ago)
by snl performance i mean vma duh
i was gonna say i didn't hear about that
― markers, Monday, 25 August 2014 16:32 (eleven years ago)
you guys need to hang on in that Collins At The School Assembly thing until they do "Land of Confusion," it's tremendous
― Now I Am Become Dracula (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 25 August 2014 17:07 (eleven years ago)
otm x infinity
― alpine static, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:11 (eleven years ago)
Toby Sideburns3 months ago Whats wrong?? Stundents? Yes? Timing bad. Very bad. I like PHIL COLLINS original! Only! But this > this makes me sad!! :(
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Monday, 25 August 2014 17:12 (eleven years ago)
I guess it's just bad music journalism, but this description (from the Guardian interview):
At this year’s ceremony, she seemed determined to eclipse that with a rendition of the bruised All Too Well, a song allegedly inspired by her relationship with Jake Gyllenhaal. Her performance was fierce and focused.
has nothing to do with this terrible performance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BidCMrrJXA
Not that it necessarily matters much. I was under the impression that post-rockist criticism was supposed to focus less on values that stem from 60s/70s rock criticism, but the reception of Taylor seems to foucs quite a lot on her being very authentic, writing her own songs etc. Why is this so?
On another note it's nice that Taylor sees her self as a feminist now, but sad to hear that "As a teenager, I didn’t understand that saying you’re a feminist is just saying that you hope women and men will have equal rights and equal opportunities. What it seemed to me, the way it was phrased in culture, society, was that you hate men" - amazing how this conception is still around, way to go class propaganda by the enemy!
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:36 (eleven years ago)
Yeah, I'd like to think she's more thoughtful than that. That's such a cartoony and reductive belief to hold.
― how's life, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:48 (eleven years ago)
tbh this is the part that bothers me: 'a song allegedly inspired by her relationship with Jake Gyllenhaal."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 25 August 2014 17:50 (eleven years ago)
like, who cares?
wuh? i loved that grammy's performance
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 25 August 2014 17:51 (eleven years ago)
taylor swift highlighted letters in red in her lyric sheet to reveal clues about who the songs were about - she's very complicit when it comes to framing some of her songs in "you're so vain" terms
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:52 (eleven years ago)
sorry, she used gratuitous capitalization, not highlighting
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:53 (eleven years ago)
http://www.vulture.com/2012/10/who-is-each-song-on-taylor-swifts-album-about.html
5. "All Too Well"Hidden Message: MAPLE LATTESAs Vulture's Kyle Buchanan points out, "Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal Share Thanksgiving Maple Lattes" is the third result when you Google "maple lattes." (The song is also just brutally specific, with references to hanging out at Maggie's house and plaid days and the trip upstate when they went apple-picking. Advantage Swift.)
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)
Yeah dug the grammy gig
― abcfsk, Monday, 25 August 2014 17:56 (eleven years ago)
the Grammy gig is the one on which someone overlaid the Ryu gif kicking her in the face, right
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Monday, 25 August 2014 18:00 (eleven years ago)
To me her vocal just sounds insecure in the grammy's performance, as if she's either very nervous or not a good singer by traditional standards. I don't mind her not hitting notes, but the shakiness in the voice is annoying.
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
this is because she is not a good singer by traditional standards
― Star Gentle Uterus (DJP), Monday, 25 August 2014 18:01 (eleven years ago)
her whole thing with dropping hints in the cd booklets about who each song is about is probably something her fans like a lot -- if taylor's appeal is based heavily on how "normal" and "relatable" (see: "you belong with me") then participating in this sort of quasi-gossip with them adds depth to the realism
but if you don't care it's pretty easy to ignore
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 25 August 2014 18:02 (eleven years ago)
i haven't really gotten "feminist" from TS, either in her music or interviews, though i haven't read the one linked the other day
― k3vin k., Monday, 25 August 2014 18:03 (eleven years ago)
imo i don't have the right to discuss whether a woman is or isn't "feminist" unless she actively campaigns for women to have fewer rights than men she's ahead of me just for being a woman
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:07 (eleven years ago)
she says she used to think feminism was about hating men but through her friendship with lena dunham she learned that it's about equal rights and so is TS
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:08 (eleven years ago)
― da croupier, Monday, August 25, 2014 2:07 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
as a critic your responsibility is more than rendering your judgment of whether a record has cool sounds, tho. if it's germane to her art and how it's consumed, it should be written about
― k3vin k., Monday, 25 August 2014 18:11 (eleven years ago)
quite a few women (in Denmark, in far right parties) campaign for fewer rights (under the guise of rights: women should have the right to stay at home with kids and not earn their own money etc.) a bit off topic sry
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:12 (eleven years ago)
obviously, if she were due for some sort of takedown on those grounds (and i'm not suggesting she is), ideally the article would be written by a woman
― k3vin k., Monday, 25 August 2014 18:13 (eleven years ago)
my point is that she's a feminist whether or not she says she is unless she goes the full phyllis schafly. and bearing that kind of effort, any dude judging any woman's degree of feminism is full of shit
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:13 (eleven years ago)
I agree that it seems meaningless to debate who's more feminist, but it should be fair - as a man, too - to discuss feminist politics (not that TS has any that I know of)
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:18 (eleven years ago)
no one is debating whether a man can discuss "feminist politics," but whether a man can stand in judgment of a woman's status as feminist
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:20 (eleven years ago)
people on the long-end of the rights stick shouldn't be deciding whether those on the short ends are doing enough to even things out
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
http://thenewinquiry.com/features/is-taylor-swift-a-feminist/
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Monday, 25 August 2014 18:21 (eleven years ago)
omg that's crazy
― niels, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:23 (eleven years ago)
i think...we are coming from the same place, but i'm reluctant to declare it completely off-limits. it certainly isn't the kind of thing that could be done correctly in a pitchfork review or something
i mean if someone like SFJ, to pick a man with an audience and a decent-enough word count, were to make a text-based examination of TS's gender politics a major theme of a piece of his in the new yorker, particularly if he drew on and cited some earlier published work on the topic from female writers, i don't see why that wouldn't be ok.
― k3vin k., Monday, 25 August 2014 18:28 (eleven years ago)
amazing how this conception is still around
have you ever set foot outside the city?
― example (crüt), Monday, 25 August 2014 18:30 (eleven years ago)
because taylor swift will always be more of a feminist than SFJ, just for being a woman who lives her life as if she has the same rights as SFJ and inherently has to fight to do so, rather than being a man who is willing to accept that she has the same rights as him but benefits from the stasis on that front (and jesus did you have to pick the guy who wished the arcade fire treated race more like mick jagger does)
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:32 (eleven years ago)
i may not want to hear beyonce express her desire to "cater 2 u" but that in no way makes me more of a feminist than beyonce
― da croupier, Monday, 25 August 2014 18:34 (eleven years ago)
beyoncé didn't say she was a feminist in an interview until last year, and even then she said that the word can be "very extreme" (this was before ***flawless)! but if you were to judge beyoncé's feminist credentials based on that you'd look a bit ridiculous.
― prolego, Monday, 25 August 2014 19:15 (eleven years ago)
Sheryl Sandberg, so much to answer for.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Monday, 25 August 2014 19:19 (eleven years ago)
men with really strong views on the parameters of feminism are extremely suspect imo i.e. http://flavorwire.com/429583/why-beyonce-makes-me-want-to-die
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 25 August 2014 21:22 (eleven years ago)
(which is to say that i mostly side with croupier here)
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 25 August 2014 21:24 (eleven years ago)
"flavorwire"
― markers, Monday, 25 August 2014 21:35 (eleven years ago)
fuckin hell that article
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 25 August 2014 22:02 (eleven years ago)
yeah that article is...not an example of what i am talking about. but this is not a discussion i feel the need to continue
― k3vin k., Monday, 25 August 2014 22:47 (eleven years ago)
[Edit: Some follow-up thoughts on this piece, and the way I addressed its subject matter, here. -TH]
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 25 August 2014 22:50 (eleven years ago)
Would be amazing if she decided to go all Blondie and late 80s Fleetwood Mac on us, but that single does not give me any hope.
― Greer, Monday, 25 August 2014 23:20 (eleven years ago)
"is x a feminist" (or the somewhat shrill need for her to define herself as a feminist) is a basic and reductive question, and a red herring. i don't think it's impossible for a man to analyse a woman's gender politics well, though most of the time this doesn't happen.
it's nice that taylor swift now defines herself as a feminist, and is smart enough to retrospectively define who she used to be as a feminist even when she shied away from the word. less nice that her social politics seem to have become more off-putting now. hanging out with lena dunham may have been her feminist awakening but i can't imagine it did much for her racial politics and awareness of appropriation.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 26 August 2014 06:47 (eleven years ago)
At age 24 she's allowed to do mistakes, especially when there is so little education about racial politics and appropriation in general. I'm not defending the video, but I don't think she's approaching Lily Allen territory yet.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 26 August 2014 07:04 (eleven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/qEkt3Pc.gif
― 龜, Thursday, 28 August 2014 13:02 (eleven years ago)
http://excusememe.com/pics/images/1300861443_tumblr_li4ukoewpf1qf3tjjo1_500.gif
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 28 August 2014 13:10 (eleven years ago)
This song is so good I want to gently slap my thighs.
― how's life, Thursday, 28 August 2014 13:15 (eleven years ago)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/08/29/taylor_swift_shake_it_off_is_no_1_here_s_how_she_did_it_video.html
Man how come I didn't know about "Highway don't care"
Fantastic
― 龜, Friday, 29 August 2014 22:38 (eleven years ago)
This single is growing on me... It sounds really fucking good on a bad sound system.
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 5 September 2014 04:28 (eleven years ago)
wasn't a fan at first but then i heard a tiny clip used as a bumper before a commercial break on the MLB Network, went "...oh" and went and listened to it six times in a row
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Friday, 5 September 2014 04:47 (eleven years ago)
i just try to ignore the terrible rapping bit
tbh the spoken bit in WANEGBT makes me cringe too :/
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Friday, 5 September 2014 04:49 (eleven years ago)
It's great, I got pissed off abt the video furore and only listened properly a couple days ago, can't stop now (xpost yeah that "sick beat" line ius just disconcerting)
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 5 September 2014 04:56 (eleven years ago)
still a total riot
― uberweiss, Friday, 5 September 2014 07:36 (eleven years ago)
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/features/taylor-swift-1989-cover-story-20140908
― prolego, Monday, 8 September 2014 15:26 (eleven years ago)
a katy perry diss song suddenly makes everything so much better
― prolego, Monday, 8 September 2014 15:27 (eleven years ago)
and yesssss at a song about how sexy harry styles is in white t-shirts <3
― prolego, Monday, 8 September 2014 15:31 (eleven years ago)
lol i was sure the harry styles relationship wasn't real
best mental image to come out of that interview = t-swift rapping "backstreet freestyle" off by heart
― lex pretend, Monday, 8 September 2014 16:41 (eleven years ago)
― prolego,
I especially love when you can notice that the hair on his chest is drawn with a dry erase board marker
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 8 September 2014 16:42 (eleven years ago)
this story is insane
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 8 September 2014 16:55 (eleven years ago)
Swift leads the way into one of her four guest bedrooms. "This is where Karlie usually stays," she says – meaning supermodel Karlie Kloss, one of her new BFFs, whom she met nine months ago at the Victoria's Secret fashion show. There's a basket of Kloss's favorite Whole Foods treats next to the bed, and multiple photos of her on the walls. Against another wall, there's a rack full of white nightgowns. "This is a thing me and Lena have," says Swift – meaning Lena Dunham, another recent friend. "We wear them during the day and look like pioneer women, fresh off the Oregon Trail."
c'mon
OMG, this sounds like Jewel cover story level nuts. reading now!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:32 (eleven years ago)
"I need lunch like, whoa"/"Oooh, get a boatload."
I wish these were song lyrics.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:34 (eleven years ago)
@MEDIA_MINX • 19 minutes ago"She’s left country behind, sworn off dating and built a fortress around her heart," add "her" before country and you've got the plot to Frozen.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:50 (eleven years ago)
idk the story was kind of boring, not really that fascinated by all the security she has to have or the things in her home
"shake it off" is sounding better to me now, it's not great but certainly better than "mine" was as a lead single lol
― dyl, Monday, 8 September 2014 17:56 (eleven years ago)
idk the story was kind of boring
I love how boring it was! It was like watching a turtle in a terrarium. A very rich turtle with famous turtle friends.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:05 (eleven years ago)
Wish he at least prodded a bit about what 'weird 80s' means for the record but I guess we'll find out soon enough.
― abcfsk, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:27 (eleven years ago)
Or yknow asked any questions about music
― abcfsk, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:30 (eleven years ago)
^
― how's life, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:38 (eleven years ago)
Writer at one point says she sounds jaded. I'll say. Reading it alone made me feel depressed tbh
― ambient yacht god (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 8 September 2014 18:39 (eleven years ago)
This is otm, and one of its many pleasures (for me). Like the Jewel piece way back when, it's as much about the writer as it is about its subject, perhaps more so. I refuse to believe Taylor Swift is the sum of what's indicated by this piece, so my suspicion is that the writer (or his editor) decided to go all surface and make that the subject. Paired with the pictures (wet shirt on the beach! supermodel open-mouth!), the non-stop name-dropping, the humble-brag luxury (she's just like one of us except for the all the myriad ways in which she is not!), it plays perfectly into the the pre-packaged story of Swift going pop. It's facile to the point of surreal, steadfastly refusing to even minimally challenge Swift or the reader, as if smugly satisfied that the surface story is all we need and all we want. And Swift, bless her, totally allows it to happen. She's no dummy. I mean, emptying your wallet so a fan can get a better birthday dinner than Chipotle? That's awesome. I've never loved a subject so much yet hated everything about it and the world she's willingly pursuing in such equal measure. Totally depressing, totally banal, totally fascinating. It's like an auto-tuned article.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:51 (eleven years ago)
I am easily amused.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:52 (eleven years ago)
lol
― example (crüt), Monday, 8 September 2014 18:53 (eleven years ago)
love her bringing 4 diff iced coffees for the reporter (and herself presumably?)
― johnny crunch, Monday, 8 September 2014 18:55 (eleven years ago)
TS seems trusting of reporters and ready to go with their flow, sometimes that allows her to ramble on amazingly candid about her future career and artistic choices, sometimes it's all interior design and fast living. She may be jaded about some things here but she seems very enthusiastic about attacking trite accepted wisdoms said and written about her.
― abcfsk, Monday, 8 September 2014 21:31 (eleven years ago)
Total pro without coming off a control freak, or, conversely, without coming off a control freak who is trying not to come off a control freak, which is some feat for a person who spends such a huge part of that piece complaining about covert surveillance and the steps she takes to keep out prying eyes and/or keep others from inappropriately monetizing her personality/brand. It's really well put together, almost like propaganda: neighbors hate her seawall, but she thinks she improved it; everything about her music is on hardcore lockdown, but she is accessible enough that a fan can spontaneously hang with her in the wild; she's owns a second apartment to house her security team and even her security goon shudders at the number of shoes he has to haul around, but she still bumps into her furniture and spazzes out over muffins and playing dress-up, the big goof.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2014 21:40 (eleven years ago)
Against another wall, there's a rack full of white nightgowns. "This is a thing me and Lena have," says Swift – meaning Lena Dunham, another recent friend. "We wear them during the day and look like pioneer women, fresh off the Oregon Trail."
SHOSHANNA HAS DIED OF DYSENTERY
― You and Dad's Army? (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 8 September 2014 22:46 (eleven years ago)
the essence of most arguments i get in with people about taylor swift is that everyone thinks she's marnie and she's so clearly actually shosh
― james brooks, Monday, 8 September 2014 22:47 (eleven years ago)
it's true
― le goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 8 September 2014 22:47 (eleven years ago)
heard someone was talking shit about "mine"
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 8 September 2014 23:14 (eleven years ago)
switchblade.jpg
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 8 September 2014 23:15 (eleven years ago)
Heading back downstairs, she passes an antique lamp with the inscription CALADIUM SEGUINUM on it. Swift took Latin in high school, but says she isn't sure what it means. (Later, I look it up. It turns out it's a homeopathic remedy for male impotence.)
Amazing
― 龜, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:18 (eleven years ago)
The new song came on the radio and my daughter, in the back seat and I swear unprompted, started griping: "I liked Taylor Swift better before. I can't even tell this is her, it sounds like everybody else. I liked her better when she didn't want to sound like everybody else."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:42 (eleven years ago)
CALADIUM SEGUINUM
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:43 (eleven years ago)
is this issue out yet?
― markers, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:43 (eleven years ago)
walgreens still had the one with the robin williams cover
― markers, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:44 (eleven years ago)
Taylor Swift goodwill tour continues unabated:
http://www.today.com/entertainment/taylor-swift-sends-touching-instagram-message-bullied-teen-fan-1D80126920
TBF, this is a lovely gesture, even if in the end it's All About Taylor. She's kind of the positive analog to Amanda Palmer.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 September 2014 13:52 (eleven years ago)
It's like an auto-tuned article.
Dude. A+
― Tim F, Thursday, 11 September 2014 15:12 (eleven years ago)
I got mine in the mail yesterday, and RS usually hits retail on Thursdays/Fridays, although this is frequently hit and miss (my sister and my mother both work merchandising for a magazine distributor, and I've heard that some chains perennially get RS up to a week late).
― You and Dad's Army? (C. Grisso/McCain), Thursday, 11 September 2014 15:28 (eleven years ago)
ah awesome! thank you
― markers, Thursday, 11 September 2014 15:31 (eleven years ago)
Josh's daughter OTM.
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Thursday, 11 September 2014 16:10 (eleven years ago)
Anyone knows the story of this? http://www.buzzfeed.com/aemunreza/secrets-hijabis-will-never-tell-you-zdtt?sub=3450046_3897328&utm_term=1uprzfy
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Saturday, 27 September 2014 02:04 (eleven years ago)
That was not the Taylor Swift album news I was hoping for.
― how's life, Saturday, 27 September 2014 10:51 (eleven years ago)
she won an award, she wanted to hug the person giving her the award, the person giving her the award could not hug her back due to holding the award, the person holding the award didn't appear to be happy about this chain of events, and then the gif ends
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Saturday, 27 September 2014 11:11 (eleven years ago)
some writer heard the album at a fan event last weekend and was tweeting about it. said it's all pop except for two ballads, one that was written with chapman
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 27 September 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)
did they mention anything more about any more bad rapping?
― how's life, Monday, 29 September 2014 13:59 (eleven years ago)
i'm a) surprised there hasn't been a second promo single yet b) absolutely dreading further material now
― lex pretend, Monday, 29 September 2014 14:00 (eleven years ago)
yeah it feels like we're due for another song from this
― call all destroyer, Monday, 29 September 2014 14:03 (eleven years ago)
feel like this album is going to be taylor's attempt at remaking "heartthrob"
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 01:37 (eleven years ago)
Shake It Off's still doing well, so a second single probably won't even be announced until around the album release date aka mid-late October.
― Greer, Tuesday, 30 September 2014 02:52 (eleven years ago)
shake it off can keep me alive for at least two more years
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 02:58 (eleven years ago)
anyone watch her iloveradio performance? she did a great synth pop ballad version of "love story"
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 30 September 2014 04:17 (eleven years ago)
Details of her next release:
“Taylor lives her life with an open heart, and by sharing her personal stories through music, art and fragrance, she helps inspire her fans to follow their heart, to be their own artist — to do incredible things. Channeling Taylor’s inherent ability to see beauty in the world, she encourages her fans to do the same.”
http://www.popjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/screenshot_904.jpg
― groovypanda, Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:47 (eleven years ago)
by sharing her personal stories through...fragrance
― Greer, Thursday, 2 October 2014 13:49 (eleven years ago)
Any word on a "pour homme" version?
― how's life, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:01 (eleven years ago)
by sharing her personal stories through...fragrance― Greer, Thursday, October 2, 2014 1:49 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 October 2014 14:08 (eleven years ago)
i use my personal fragrance to tell people personal stories about what i had for dinner last night
― jamiesummerz, Thursday, 2 October 2014 15:36 (eleven years ago)
http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/Pepe-Le-Pew-cartoon-classics-756140_314_192.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 October 2014 15:39 (eleven years ago)
http://paperplanes.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/PePeLePew.jpg
the phrasing is awkward but sounds + sights + smells are sufficient to establish a narrative imo
― example (crüt), Thursday, 2 October 2014 15:40 (eleven years ago)
Loving him was floriental.
― Greer, Thursday, 2 October 2014 15:51 (eleven years ago)
That looks like a Taylor Swift wax figurine in the ad.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 2 October 2014 15:53 (eleven years ago)
is she going to do that thing where she drops promo singles in the weeks leading up to release?
― dyl, Thursday, 2 October 2014 16:15 (eleven years ago)
I'm late to this thread, so three weeks after the fact irl lol at SHOSHANNA HAS DIED OF DYSENTERY!
― Dick Clownload (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 2 October 2014 16:17 (eleven years ago)
Channeling Taylor’s inherent ability to see beauty in the world, she encourages her fans to do the same
this is beautiful gibberish
― da croupier, Thursday, 2 October 2014 16:19 (eleven years ago)
She's just going to douse herself with her perfume then walk around every major market for a couple of months. By the time the album is released, people will be primed.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 October 2014 16:59 (eleven years ago)
and a dangling modifier!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:02 (eleven years ago)
I misread that as Channing Tatum.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 October 2014 17:05 (eleven years ago)
This cover version has sort of given me some hope for the next album.
I have no idea what the original version sounds like. I really like most of her cover versions, and the way she manages to pull off even her shittier choices.
― cpl593H, Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:06 (ten years ago)
have you heard beirut? the original sounds exactly like any beirut song ever. it is actually creepy. also creepy that beirut's last album was called "the rip tide." conspiracy? i'm not going to jump to any conclusions, but i've alerted my local police force just in case.
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:14 (ten years ago)
anyway "shake it off" should give you hope for the album because "shake it off" is incredible
i don't get you people
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:15 (ten years ago)
yes "shake it off" is still incredible.
I GO ON TOO MANY DATES :D
― uberweiss, Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:27 (ten years ago)
promo single "out of the woods" coming out tuesday btw
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 9 October 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
yeah I love "Shake It Off"
― droit au butt (Euler), Thursday, 9 October 2014 21:29 (ten years ago)
i've alerted my local police force just in case.
― linda cardellini (zachlyon),
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 October 2014 21:31 (ten years ago)
contender for worst song of the decade so far
― Mr. Snrub, Thursday, 9 October 2014 22:46 (ten years ago)
"Out Of The Woods" is written by Taylor Swift and Jack Antonoff (Bleachers, Fun) and produced by Jack Antonoff and Taylor Swift with vocal production by Max Martin for MXM Productions.
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 13 October 2014 14:52 (ten years ago)
psyched
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 13 October 2014 14:57 (ten years ago)
sounds a bit like holy ground from the v lq snippet floating around. huge drums
― prolego, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:00 (ten years ago)
can't decipher anything from the snippet
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 13 October 2014 15:01 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-M5SW8QvmY
― prolego, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:03 (ten years ago)
what a weird studio setup. there's a reason this type of thing is usually done with a chair and not a couch.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:06 (ten years ago)
"Out Of The Woods" is written by Taylor Swift and Jack Antonoff (Bleachers, Fun)
Excitement level plummeting.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:09 (ten years ago)
idk antonoff's responsible for one of my favorite singles of the year but idk how that'll translate to taylor (his last song with her "sweeter than fiction" was... all right)
also i like fun.
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 13 October 2014 15:11 (ten years ago)
2014 is truly the year of disappointment when it comes to pop stars i had an emotional investment in
― lex pretend, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:19 (ten years ago)
The song isn't even out yet.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Monday, 13 October 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
truly
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 13 October 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
sounds kinda new wave-y which i guess is unsurprising given antonoff's involvement
vocally sounds like she's singing in a lower register than normal
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 13 October 2014 15:25 (ten years ago)
jack antonoff was also responsible for introducing her to lena dunham, so there's that
― prolego, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:26 (ten years ago)
I actually liked the Bleachers album and their last song together was alright, so this might be good. The clip sounded somewhat promising. Chorus might be too repetitive for my tastes if it doesn't unfold into something more complicated.
It's like a low quality xerox copy of the most ubiquitous pop songs from the last 2 years. Even if I liked it, I can't imagine it ever rising to the level of "incredible". The pop attempts from Red were actually all superior.
― Greer, Monday, 13 October 2014 15:50 (ten years ago)
Chorus might be too repetitive for my tastes if it doesn't unfold into something more complicated.
had the same thought
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 13 October 2014 16:30 (ten years ago)
what are the immediate antecedents of i. the parpy synthy brass loop and ii. the annoying, goofy rhythm in shake it off, they both immediately recall something but i can't place it
it's harmonically either 'interesting' or 'this person doesn't quite know how to write a pop tune', idk
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 13 October 2014 16:53 (ten years ago)
the live versions of "shake it off" remain noticeably superior imo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8PaXlh8E5w
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 13 October 2014 16:55 (ten years ago)
Ok the Tightrope comparisons are starting to make more sense
― tsrobodo, Monday, 13 October 2014 17:27 (ten years ago)
more i hear shake it off (and that live version helps) more i think it's an ok song that should have been produced and arranged in a completely different way.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 13 October 2014 17:48 (ten years ago)
http://www.tonaltrends.com/shake-it-off-taylor-swift-sync/4586174865
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 13 October 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
the more I hear "Shake It Off", the more I hope ebola takes me from this wretched earth
― 💪😈⚠️ (DJP), Monday, 13 October 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
the more I hear "Shake It Off", the more I hope ebola takes Rick Scot
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 October 2014 22:12 (ten years ago)
xp i feel that way too, it's like i'm just not worthy of living on a planet that has produced something as perfect as this song
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 13 October 2014 22:19 (ten years ago)
So scrub my skin with Dear JohnChain my tongue with StarlightStuff my nose with Sparks FlyCoat my eyes with Last KissFill my ears with HauntedStick my legs in FearlessTell me lies about Shake It Off.
― GhostTunes on my Pono (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 13 October 2014 22:26 (ten years ago)
Out of The Woods is "out there".
― Greer, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:29 (ten years ago)
fuuuuuck
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:34 (ten years ago)
Im crying
REMEMBER WHEN YOU HIT THE BRAKES TOO SOONTWENTY STITCHES IN A HOSPITAL ROOMWHEN YOU STARTED CRYING BABY I DID TOOBUT WHEN THE SUN CAME UP I WAS LOOKING AT YOUREMEMBER WHEN WE COULDN'T TAKE THE HEATI WALKED OUT, I SAID I'M SETTING YOU FREEBUT THE MONSTERS TURNED OUT TO BE JUST TREESWHEN THE SUN CAME UP YOU WERE LOOKING AT ME
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:37 (ten years ago)
completely overwhelmed rn
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:42 (ten years ago)
sorry to everyone who gets to read this later/tomorrow
including me
*presses play again*
i'm right there with you
i can't even deal with this
why is everything she does perfect
what even is this
this is insane
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:45 (ten years ago)
IN THE CLEAR YET GOOD
when the sun came up YOU WERE LOOKING AT ME
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:46 (ten years ago)
this is good. chorus feels slight the first time but it really builds.
nice twist on the "holy ground"/"state of grace" blueprint
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:48 (ten years ago)
heartthrob 2014
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:50 (ten years ago)
link fwiw http://fearlesslyonfire.tumblr.com/post/99964939010/out-of-the-woods-taylor-swift
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:51 (ten years ago)
you can totally hear antonoff in this but unlike "shake it off" this is 100% taylor
great backing vocals
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:52 (ten years ago)
yes the background vocals throughout, i'm fucking done
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:53 (ten years ago)
the last 30 seconds of this are *_*
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:54 (ten years ago)
the repetition is like being caught in a doomy loop of your own thoughts
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:56 (ten years ago)
great song! waaaay better than Shake it off.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:56 (ten years ago)
hope whatever i just posted is coherent
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:57 (ten years ago)
I'M MESMERISED IDK WHAT IS EVEN HAPPENING
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:58 (ten years ago)
it's like claustrophobic & shit does that sound smart
who knows anymore
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 03:59 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, October 13, 2014 11:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
nah i feel this
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:03 (ten years ago)
unable to construct sentences, i am within the woods
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:07 (ten years ago)
this song is really really good
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:08 (ten years ago)
when we decided to move the furniture so we could dancebaby like we stood a chance
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:13 (ten years ago)
two airplanes flying FLYING AND I REMEMBER THINKINGGGGGGGGGGGH783RHTENGENHG7HGB7 7HBC HBV GBFGHTFH5EWYGTR
you have to laugh at grown men sitting around listening to taylor swift
just my $0.02
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:16 (ten years ago)
*places candle in front of sprawling RIP FRANK KOGAN mural*
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:18 (ten years ago)
bitch arent you named after a pokemon
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:21 (ten years ago)
this is much better than shake it off and is just a pretty good song all round.
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:23 (ten years ago)
pretty sure missingNO is a random ilx post generator at this point
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:26 (ten years ago)
I was expecting the worst, so I'm pleasantly relieved. The vocal melody is the same four-cornered box almost every pop song is built on now, so it's pointless to fault her for that. Production is aces, though.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:26 (ten years ago)
EmoTaylor 4eva
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:27 (ten years ago)
This song and Shake It Off seem like terrible bedfellows on the same record.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:27 (ten years ago)
Robyn with less Euro.
― Hinklepicker, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:28 (ten years ago)
her last album had "i knew you were trouble" and "22" sandwiched by three classic singer songwritery joints and it turned out fine
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:29 (ten years ago)
kenny mellman just called it "Kate Bush like" which is a good connect. I can hear Robyn in there too.
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:33 (ten years ago)
I don't buy the "Kate Bush like" descriptor at all. Just because it's heavily rhythmic? This is more like "Shout" by Tears for Fears.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:35 (ten years ago)
I can hear that too!
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:37 (ten years ago)
yeah the sequencing on red would totally boomerang between modes, and i can at least see the drum programming here feeding nicely into the drum loop of "shake it off"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:42 (ten years ago)
moods* not modes
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:43 (ten years ago)
Can't stand "Shake It Off," but I like this one a lot. I like how the tempo is just two or three beats fast enough to keep it peppy, which should help me tolerate it longer should it catch on and approach ubiquity. FWIW, it sounds like she's been listening to M83, but this may also be the first T Swift song I've heard where I've actually been impressed by what she's doing vocally, if not the melody than the hypnotically repetitive lack of melody, which works. It's rhythmic but kind of ... airy? Not claustrophobic, like a lot of dance music. Light on its feet. Hmm.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:46 (ten years ago)
― Hinklepicker, Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:28 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
otm. the production is killing it here.
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:49 (ten years ago)
fwiw I think this is pretty strong and I think "shake it off" is a crime against humanity
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:50 (ten years ago)
Actively dislike that chorus even in context, great verses and middle 8 though.
― Greer, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:57 (ten years ago)
i maintain that "shake it off" would be great if it sounded like an amy winehouse song instead of someone playing an amy winehouse song on a $25 keyboard
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 04:58 (ten years ago)
love her vocals here, the mesmeric circuit of the chorus, the deliverance experienced as stunned relief, pretty much everything
― struggle blogger (Andre Gunder Frank 3000), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 05:16 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:50 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yep
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 05:29 (ten years ago)
these are the contents of my head
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 05:33 (ten years ago)
you guys this new song is very CHVRCHES and also i hear annie lennox's "why?" in the vocals
also this may be unrelated to taylor but i feel like annie lennox is having a low-key renaissance right now, or maybe she has for years but it feels especially evident now
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 05:48 (ten years ago)
Right? her version of "i put a spell on you" is entirely trustworthy; kinda curious about the new albumhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF6sJriQbx4
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 05:51 (ten years ago)
GOOD
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 06:14 (ten years ago)
Holy Florence & the Machine. Good track.
― A. Begrand, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 06:47 (ten years ago)
oh this is so good thank fuck
can she stop misdirecting with her first singles already though, my heart can't take it
― prolego, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 06:49 (ten years ago)
all those classic taylor motifs still there - screaming colour, going back to december, dancing around household objects <3 <3 <3
― prolego, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 06:55 (ten years ago)
judging from OOTW, i'm assuming jack antonoff also co-produced the version of "love story" taylor performed at iheartradio
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:03 (ten years ago)
Antonoff's production may lean Churches but this immediately reminded me of her earlier stadium rock songs.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:50 (ten years ago)
I'M SO RELIEVED THIS IS SO GOOD
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:51 (ten years ago)
it's most obviously jumping off "holy ground" and "state of grace" obv; the other comparisons are all a bit squinty. chvrches - production details maybe but they've never had a SONG like this. kate bush - well, "hounds of love" specifically, thematically and percussively and backing vox wise, but weirdly i feel like that's probably accidental? idk it's TAYLOR more than any influences and it's that i'm so relieved about
WHEN THE SUN CAME UP YOU WERE LOOKING AT ME
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:55 (ten years ago)
wow my ipod just went on to "shake it off" and smh i can't even last 10 seconds into that especially now i have this
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:58 (ten years ago)
the production is the worst thing about this, right? the drums don't boom like on the similar red trax and those electro squiggles right at the climax are so unnecessary
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 07:59 (ten years ago)
"heartthrob 2014" is so otm
― nxd, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 08:46 (ten years ago)
In a good way, love that recordThis sounds great, to 'Shake it Off' how I found 'Trouble' to 'WANEGBT'
― nxd, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 08:51 (ten years ago)
This is incredible. "it's TAYLOR more than any influences" is OTM
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 09:16 (ten years ago)
crying tears of joy rn
― Tim F, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 09:18 (ten years ago)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, October 14, 2014 3:51 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
So relieved
― 龜, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:15 (ten years ago)
I don't really care what other songs this sounds like
I am just very happy :) :) :)
― nxd, Tuesday, October 14, 2014 8:46 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah, my first response was "She really did like that Tegan and Sara album, huh?"
Good track on first listen. I need to hear it loud through good speakers to really appreciate it, I think.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:45 (ten years ago)
love it, not nearly as much as shake it off tho
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:54 (ten years ago)
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, October 14, 2014 2:14 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
Line of the year imo
― 龜, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:55 (ten years ago)
ugh that dude vocal sample part of this reminds me of the terrible futureheads hounds of love cover :-(((((
― jamiesummerz, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:58 (ten years ago)
― lex pretend,
how is it you still keep this around
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 11:59 (ten years ago)
The song's arrangement layers '80s and contemporary elements, especially when it comes to the synthesizers. "I used a Yamaha DX7 a lot on that song, which is so uniquely '80s, but then countered it with a super-distorted Minimoog Voyager in the chorus," Antonoff says. "That sounds extremely modern to me. It's that back-and-forth."
For one part of the track, he says, "I just chopped this piece of my voice singing and started looping it over and over. Then I started banging on some drums I had in the room and stomping on the floor and sampling all these sounds to make this big bombastic looping beat with the sample on top of it."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 12:00 (ten years ago)
Sounds like Jack Antonoff alright.
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 12:10 (ten years ago)
this sounds more like taylor's own "haunted" than any references being thrown around
― prolego, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 12:15 (ten years ago)
i'm still listening to it
the middle eight, just...holy christ so good
such amazing use of climactic echo on this track
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 13:26 (ten years ago)
The mirror of "I was looking at you"/"You were looking at me" is one of those trademark Taylor touches, the camera doing a 360 pan of this relationship.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:14 (ten years ago)
Ok this is really great.
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:25 (ten years ago)
OK I'm crying too. Maybe I was a bit too anxious about this new album, with the disappointment Shake it Off was and me wanting 1989 so badly to be good, so this is some kind of release too. Kate Bush connections are OTM, backing vocals and echo especially, and it also reminds me of Umbrella.
So hopefully this continues the trend of pedestrian first singles followed by great albums that she's been on for her last three records.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:40 (ten years ago)
Damn you Taylor you don't want to release this in office time when a grown man doesn't want to be seen crying!!!
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:41 (ten years ago)
wtf at all this crying
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:41 (ten years ago)
Stop crying everybody. lol xp
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:42 (ten years ago)
Thematically it's also linked to Back to December and All Too Well.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:42 (ten years ago)
Just thinking of Taylor Swift makes me well up. When I said I liked the song? I meant to say it is the most beautiful thing I have ever heard. Also, I am 12 years old.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 14:48 (ten years ago)
Damn you guys a man lowers his guard and this is what he gets, what insensitive machines the system has made of us.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:04 (ten years ago)
naw man, I'm saying. My tears have welled up in their ducts to a Taylor Swift song before. Not this one even by a mile though. It's a good song though. Very relieved that there is no lyrical attempt to judge the song's own beat.
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:12 (ten years ago)
When I said I liked the song? I meant to say it is the most beautiful thing I have ever heard. Also, I am 12 years old.
me irl
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
They moved the furniture and got down to this. sick. beat.
― Greer, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:19 (ten years ago)
You want to cry, listen to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-BeYgX3XDs
I respect the right of anyone to be moved by anything, but let me know when T. Swift does anything this heartwrenching.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
thanks josh!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
very considerate of you!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
:)
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:21 (ten years ago)
I didn't even need Kathleen Edwards nor Taylor to be crying tbf, but thanks all the same :)
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:22 (ten years ago)
All those Canadian love songs and their hockey references maple syrup pull yourself together Josh
― GhostTunes on my Pono (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:23 (ten years ago)
When I see someone buying Grade A syrup instead of Grade B just because it's been drummed into them that getting an A is better than getting a B, it makes me sad and then I cry.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:29 (ten years ago)
i have cried to kathleen edwards songs before and it's a distinct experience from crying to a t swift song though i think both experiences are about as sophisticated as each other
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:39 (ten years ago)
I've cried to "Holy Ground", but not this new one.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:41 (ten years ago)
I cried once.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:49 (ten years ago)
that Kathleen Edwards song was a sock in the gut. Jesus, Josh.
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:50 (ten years ago)
I'm now picturing Alfred as a stoic baby.
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:51 (ten years ago)
i thought you might have some advice to give on how to be insensitive
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:52 (ten years ago)
I'm simple but I'm no fool.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:54 (ten years ago)
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid),
My birth was a 6 out of 10
It's a great track and better than anything fun.'s done. I definitely hear "All Too Well" and Kate Bush, and the chorus phrasing reminds me of "Mr. Brightside." The vocals are very interesting and deliberate.
Thing I like least are the lyrics; though they're classic Taylor, some of them stick out a little too much ("screaming color", "sun came up").
― Indexed, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 16:00 (ten years ago)
so this song's about James Woods huh
― GhostTunes on my Pono (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 16:11 (ten years ago)
phew this song is much better than shake it off
― dyl, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
Everyone's shaking off "Shake It Off".
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 16:24 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLUTCix-gog
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 16:25 (ten years ago)
this is very t.A.T.u.
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 18:21 (ten years ago)
seriously "all the things she said" is maybe 90% of this (but the last 10% is crucial)
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:18 (ten years ago)
So this is the first single of Taylor Swift I love (after having hated the former). But this is great. I've not knowingly heard music of her before. Which is the best album to start with?
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:27 (ten years ago)
You're gonna get different answers for estimable reasons. I love Speak Now best.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
Red is pretty great too and especially if you wanna stay more pop than pop-country at first.
Also, can I just, "Two paper airplanes flying, flying, flying"
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
Thanks Alfred! Was afraid I'd get flag posted for asking my question, not knowing her music, but I've only known Swift as a cultural ~phenomenon~. But this single is great and addictive and I need more. Am on 'Speak Now' as we speak!
Xp thanks S. Clover! Defo think I'd enjoy the pop over pop-country more.
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:33 (ten years ago)
Naw, man, we're all learning here.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:40 (ten years ago)
<3
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
Yeah if you like this I'd work backwards. "State of Grace" and "Treacherous" and "Holy Ground" off Red especially.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:32 (ten years ago)
fearless is imo her most consistent but speak now is my personal favorite
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:33 (ten years ago)
Bateau, I would rep heaviest for Fearless personally
― the other song about butts in the top 5 (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
All different answers, as Alfred predicted :) But thanks all, Tim F., Josh and Forks, am working my way through this. Quite the epiphany when something suddenly *clicks*. Thanks again!
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:27 (ten years ago)
i would've just recommended you do it chronologically, makes most sense that way. i don't think i have a "favourite" swift album, they've all been exactly right for the moment they came out
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 21:58 (ten years ago)
yeah listen to everything she's ever created in order is the obv answer
pref starting with this tune she wrote at 12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnfsWd3EPv8
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:13 (ten years ago)
everytime i hear that it gets stuck in my head for a week stop
― prolego, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:15 (ten years ago)
savage garden
― J. Sam, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:20 (ten years ago)
sad to see her on C4 just now appearing in a 'skit' w/ jamie 'orrible
― sʌxihɔːl (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:35 (ten years ago)
I adore the debut but IME it leaves people cold if they're not already into country (which, why, but it is what it is).
― Tim F, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:37 (ten years ago)
If listeners balk at her crossover attempts, it's the purest distillation of her talents, if uneven.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:41 (ten years ago)
xxp: is it worse than the Jimmy Fallon skit?
― how's life, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:44 (ten years ago)
― Tim F, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 22:37 (28 minutes ago) Permalink
It might be the most ear-wormy of her albums. IMO, Fearless is her best, but if you're into the pop side, start with Red and work backwards.
― Indexed, Tuesday, 14 October 2014 23:08 (ten years ago)
"Out Of The Woods" feels like Taylor's "XO".
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 03:20 (ten years ago)
we're one more song away from a secret lion king influence in pop thoughtpiece
― prolego, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 07:09 (ten years ago)
^^^
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 07:31 (ten years ago)
xxp was singing this in my head yesterday and it turned into XO
― nxd, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 08:30 (ten years ago)
update: still on loop
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 08:50 (ten years ago)
IMO "Fearless" is probably the best starting point. 6 years and 2 records later, the songs there are still, in my opinion, among her best. That being said, "Speak now" is my personal favorite and the one I find the most cohesive. Anyway, Red is also pretty great and I would definitely go for the first one after having heard those three; it's surprising how accomplished her songwriting was at such an early time in her career.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:03 (ten years ago)
― cpl593H, Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:03 AM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Let's not discount the fact that her writing partner for much of the first two records was Liz Rose (mother of Caitlin). She wrote "Tim McGraw," "Teardrops," "You Belong With Me," and "All Too Well," along with a handful of other great pop country tracks of the last decade (check out Little Big Town's "Sober" for starters).
But Taylor wrote "Our Song" and "The Outside" solo and deserves all the praise in the world for it; the album came out when she was like 14 or 15 years old. Her songwriting chops are undeniable. She wrote all of Speak Now solo, which is absolutely mental--17 tracks charted on the Billboard Hot 100.
― Indexed, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
There's a clip of another new song floating around (I would guess from a commercial) that sounds very Carly Rae Jepsen imo.
http://eyesopen.co/post/100073155419/and-thats-how-it-works-how-you-get-the-girl
― Greer, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:50 (ten years ago)
Oh wait, it's from this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okTokQgOo6I
― Greer, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:52 (ten years ago)
Gah, that just reminds me that this thing doesn't come out for two more weeks.
― how's life, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 14:56 (ten years ago)
Indeed, though I'm not sure about it, I wouldn't be surprised the reason why Speak Now sounds more of a whole was the fact she wrote it all by herself. "Our Song" and "The Outside" are the ones I find the most surprisingly precocious in the first album; "Fifteen" does the same for me in "Fearless".
Agree on Liz Rose's greatness too.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 15:27 (ten years ago)
I think Taylor's approach to co-writing is interesting -- it has obviously always been important to her to be known first of all as a writer, and "Speak Now" was a deliberate statement in that regard. But having done that, she's been happy to go back to collaborating. I think that actually says a lot about her confidence. (Not that that has ever been in doubt.)
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 15:42 (ten years ago)
I'm no expert in country music but I can see how coming from that field, where the songwriter as the sole auteur myth is less established, partnering with collaborators comes as something organic and natural.
That being said, performing her own songs has always been a big deal for her. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's not a single song in any of her albums that's not at least partially written by her. And I think I read somewhere that very early in her career she rejected some deals with major labels because they wanted to impose songwriters of their choice on her.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
yeah she's (co-)written every song she's done
imogen heap & jack antonoff have both already said she wrote basically all the lyrics to the songs they did with her on this album and their role was mostly the music around it
― uberweiss, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 17:52 (ten years ago)
The friendship blossomed into a collaboration when Antonoff sent Swift a track that he had been working on, and she begged him to send the demo her way. "That actually ended up being a song called 'I Wish You Would' which is going to be on her album," he says. "We first worked on that song together and realized we kind of have a good thing, and the next thing we did was 'Sweeter Than Fiction' which was on the ['One Chance'] soundtrack, and after that we did 'Out Of The Woods' and another song called 'You Were In Love.' So 'Out Of The Woods' was the third thing we worked on together, and probably the easiest. I sent her the track for it, and she sent back a voice note with the verse and chorus in what felt like five seconds. And it was just perfect. It's eery how similar it is to what the final product is."
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 17:56 (ten years ago)
Yeah, reminds me of the story I heard where Johnny Marr sent Kirsty MacColl a demo of what became "Walking Down Madison," just to get her reaction, and she basically sent it right back with words and melody as it is now, blowing his mind. It's so hard to gauge the contribution of big acts surrounded by all-star teams of writers - who does what, how much, etc. - but to her credit Swift has managed to shape stuff from some huge heavy hitters, like Max Martin, to suit her personality. The sound may change, but it's totally her, which I respect, even though I make fun of her.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:07 (ten years ago)
lol I heard Echosmith's "The Cool Kids" on the radio and for a sec thought it was a new Taylor song.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:43 (ten years ago)
guess echosmith is finally happening
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:48 (ten years ago)
i can't believe their parents let them leave the basement without a chorus that actually rhymes
― da croupier, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:49 (ten years ago)
Worst chorus to a song that is naggingly catchy ever.
Further research confirms they have suddenly become huge in Australia with this song in like just the past week.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 18:52 (ten years ago)
baffled by everyone saying the chorus is weak -- it's not, the repetition actually makes sense ("are we out of the woods yet" echoing "are we there yet" etc)
― katherine, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 19:11 (ten years ago)
To be clear the last few posts are about "The Cool Kids".
― Tim F, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 19:22 (ten years ago)
ok
still heard it a ton about "out of the woods" though
― katherine, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 20:00 (ten years ago)
chorus is great, "good" as happy gasping escape from (+ simultaneously resolution to) annular melody, also from woods, unity of form+content, v nice
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:21 (ten years ago)
I like "Out of the Woods" but her trick of turning encounters into ecstacies is hardening into a manner ("The rest of the world was black and white/But we were in screaming color") and for me wearisome when heard in sequence, although who knows where it'll fall in the album.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:25 (ten years ago)
on first listen i thought "well its instantly more memorable than anything by chvrches"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:26 (ten years ago)
also that it made me want to listen to "boom clap" (not that it couldn't grab me after a few more hears)
― da croupier, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:27 (ten years ago)
"echosmith" is a hilarious name. i imagine them busy at work in their foundry hammering out echoes.
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:44 (ten years ago)
I mean, it's an image worthy of verlaine, but in this context it just seems ridiculous
― I dunno. (amateurist), Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:45 (ten years ago)
baffled by everyone saying the chorus is weak -- it's not, the repetition actually makes sense ("are we out of the woods yet" echoing "are we there yet" etc)― katherine, Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:11 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― katherine, Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:11 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The repetition makes sense and I still don't like it.
― Greer, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:47 (ten years ago)
http://media.tumblr.com/1a157af266c436c47f1d2910570c3ee6/tumblr_inline_mxio0kOLnB1rvxky4.jpg
"echosmith" has the same number of letters as "rilokiley"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:47 (ten years ago)
same producer as the last rilokiley album too
― da croupier, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:48 (ten years ago)
I don't know what an Echosmith is, but it makes me think of Echobelly. Plus the Smiths. Which makes sense, because Echobelly sounded like Morrissey, iirc.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 October 2014 23:56 (ten years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:25 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
Gah can't unsee this now
― 龜, Thursday, 16 October 2014 00:45 (ten years ago)
i find the echosmith charming b/c the way the 'indie' aesthetics have been so shamelessly grafted onto teenpop has surely made someone angry
― dyl, Thursday, 16 October 2014 01:34 (ten years ago)
yeah that's the best part about it I agree.
― Tim F, Thursday, 16 October 2014 02:22 (ten years ago)
i agree but unfortunately it is also boring
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 16 October 2014 02:45 (ten years ago)
what -- indie aesthetics?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 October 2014 02:48 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 16 October 2014 02:51 (ten years ago)
"out of the woods" and tove lo's "timebomb" keep mashing up in my head
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Thursday, 16 October 2014 06:22 (ten years ago)
Interesting. I've been listening to both "Out of the Woods" and "Timebomb" pretty heavily, and they haven't been combining in my head. I think it might be because "Timebomb" mashes up in my head with Jane Sibbery's "Map of the World", and "Out of the Woods" doesn't. "Timebomb"'s melodic repetition seems more suspended to me, where "Out of the Woods"'s repetition seems yearning and cathartic. If that makes any sense at all.
― glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 16 October 2014 15:52 (ten years ago)
Yeah. I hear the repetition as the sort of thing you do when you're trying to convince yourself of something, i.e. that this relationship is going to last.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 October 2014 16:03 (ten years ago)
1. Welcome to New York2. Blank Space3. Style4. Out of the Woods5. All You Had to Do Was Stay6. Shake It Off7. I Wish You Would8. Bad Blood9. How to Get the Girl10. Wildest Dreams11. This Love12. I Know Places13. Clean
14. Wonderland15. You Are In Love16. New Romantics
http://www.billboard.com/articles/6289064/taylor-swift-1989-tracklist-alleged
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:14 (ten years ago)
It's about time New York gets a new "Empire State of Mind".
― Herbie Handcock (Murgatroid), Friday, 17 October 2014 21:28 (ten years ago)
i need taylor's "heart of the city" omg
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:30 (ten years ago)
but it's the tedder joint so there'll probably just be a really boring metaphor repeated ad infinitum
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:31 (ten years ago)
it's actually the title tune to the new abel ferrara
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imfWnlEiOFY
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 17 October 2014 21:45 (ten years ago)
i almost feel bad for Taylor's middle american fans who were with her for the "good, smart girl would like to have a good, nice boy waiting when she gets home from work" period but can't buy into the later "but the haters will stay in the sticks and you'll move to the city and be friends with lena dunham." i mean it's gotta be alienating enough for twelve-year-olds that she's feeling 22.
― da croupier, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:53 (ten years ago)
obv taylor has no responsibility to continue marketing herself country/teen etc, just acknowledging that this market segue will inherently leave some folks in the cold, and not just cuz their haters
― da croupier, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:54 (ten years ago)
lol she sung about having bigger dreams than marrying her high school bf and getting the fuck out of her small town from the outset
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:56 (ten years ago)
Leave them in the woods even
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 October 2014 21:56 (ten years ago)
again, not saying she's WRONG to evolve, just pouring one out for the left behind
― da croupier, Friday, 17 October 2014 21:59 (ten years ago)
dude who heard the album said that nathan chapman has a song on the record but maybe it's "this love" and this thing just doesn't credit him
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 17 October 2014 22:02 (ten years ago)
those credits just list songwriters; nate's the producer
it's the oldest of the songs she recorded for the album, before she shifted direction. could well be their last hurrah together
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 22:07 (ten years ago)
not a pantera cover then.
― how's life, Friday, 17 October 2014 22:12 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoLnNsHAYy4
― prolego, Friday, 17 October 2014 22:17 (ten years ago)
No, this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tymWpEU8wpM
All "god is a crul ringmaster" written on her arm in sharpie.
― how's life, Friday, 17 October 2014 22:20 (ten years ago)
it's the oldest of the songs she recorded for the album, before she shifted direction. could well be their last hurrah together― prolego, Friday, October 17, 2014 5:07 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― prolego, Friday, October 17, 2014 5:07 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
is it from her red period?
― I dunno. (amateurist), Friday, 17 October 2014 22:22 (ten years ago)
tracklist is fake
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 18 October 2014 05:25 (ten years ago)
well "welcome to new york" is the next promo single and it's track 1 so if that tracklist is wrong it's not wrong by much
― uberweiss, Sunday, 19 October 2014 00:05 (ten years ago)
idk man taylor said so on her tumblar
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Sunday, 19 October 2014 00:11 (ten years ago)
10/13 of those standard edition tracks are confirmed titles so the changes must be minor!
esquire interview: http://taylorpictures.net/displayimage.php?album=2844&pid=157298#top_display_media
― uberweiss, Sunday, 19 October 2014 01:20 (ten years ago)
Taylor Swift is firing back at critics who say she only writes songs about her exes.
"I think frankly that’s a very sexist angle to take. No one says that about Ed Sheeran. No one says it about Bruno Mars. They’re all writing songs about their exes, their current girlfriends, their love-life, and no one raises a red flag there."
She goes on to say that "my first album came out when I was sixteen, so I would write about my life as I saw it, as I felt it and then what happens is that as you get more successful, you have more and more people paying attention to what you're doing, and you've been doing it the same way your entire career as a songwriter, but all of a sudden your perspective has changed."
"The most important thing to me is maintaining artist integrity which means as a songwriter I still continue to write about my life. I could very well water it down... (but) people are going to see the depth from which you approached the song, the fact that you put real emotions into it, and that's valuable, and that's good and that's real."
― abcfsk, Sunday, 19 October 2014 08:01 (ten years ago)
Did she really name a song "Wonderland?" I hope it is neither an Alice reference nor a "Your Body is a" reference, and would cry tears of utterly not going to happen joy if it were a Big Country cover.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 19 October 2014 14:17 (ten years ago)
That's actually a great interview, the Esquire one. I don't know anything about anything, but it seems like the more ridiculous her life and/or career gets, the funnier, more self-deprecating, more perceptive, more nice she gets. I can see why the writer would be cynical about it, but I guess I do know a couple of friends who are just always admirably upbeat, or enthusiastic or whatever, things I am not, and I respect them for it, because I can tell even they have to work very hard to stay that way. So I related to the bit in the interview where Taylor basically concedes the thought process behind just leaving the house. Is it worth it today? Will I treat some 14-year old fan with respect, or will I be a dick? Do I care if someone takes my picture, or films me at dinner? Etc. There's this whole calculus. Of course, at this stage in her life/career, this is what Taylor Swift wants, which is partly what's so ridiculous about it - that's why some people move to New York or Los Angeles and others move to Jackson Hole or New Orleans or Chicago - but she seems to have put a lot of thought into her life and how she wants to lead/live it, recognizing that her life and how she wants to lead/live it will always be as much if not more a part of the conversation than her music.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 19 October 2014 14:30 (ten years ago)
Did she really name a song "Wonderland?
XTC cover.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 19 October 2014 14:35 (ten years ago)
Now I'm not going to be able to stop wondering what Taylor Swift singing Big Country's "Wonderland" would sound like.
― glenn mcdonald, Sunday, 19 October 2014 23:52 (ten years ago)
― jamiesummerz, Monday, 20 October 2014 01:14 (ten years ago)
It would sound great!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 20 October 2014 01:40 (ten years ago)
But surely, were the album to contain a "Wonderland" cover, it would have been titled 1984, not 1989.
― glenn mcdonald, Monday, 20 October 2014 03:22 (ten years ago)
welcome to new york preview
http://youtu.be/81doBkpkdJQ
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 13:06 (ten years ago)
It's a new soundtrack. I could dance to this beat.
Sounds more like a coke commercial than her actual coke commercial did.
― how's life, Monday, 20 October 2014 13:16 (ten years ago)
sounds like a low budget thomas cook ad tbh
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 13:17 (ten years ago)
This bit in the Esquire interview was all kinds of sad and creepy:
Taylor: 'I fought the idea of having security for a really long time, because I value normalcy. I really do. I like to take a drive by myself. Haven't done that in six yearsSR: 'Not even in Tennessee?'Taylor: 'No, they have to be in the car behind me because just the sheer number of men we have in a file who have showed up at my moms house, threatened to either kill me, kidnap me or marry me. This is a strange and sad part of my life that I try not to think about. I try to be lighthearted about it, because I don't ever want to be scared. And when I have security, I don't have to be scared.'
SR: 'Not even in Tennessee?'
Taylor: 'No, they have to be in the car behind me because just the sheer number of men we have in a file who have showed up at my moms house, threatened to either kill me, kidnap me or marry me. This is a strange and sad part of my life that I try not to think about. I try to be lighthearted about it, because I don't ever want to be scared. And when I have security, I don't have to be scared.'
― Greer, Monday, 20 October 2014 13:22 (ten years ago)
ignore me, total misdirection
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 19:45 (ten years ago)
welcome to new york is available for me on itunes?
and omg @ her queer subtext finally becoming text
"everybody here was someone else before / and you can you want who you want / boys and boys and girls and girls"
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:06 (ten years ago)
that it and of itself feels like such a ~moment~ i'm crying
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
LIKE ANY GREAT LOVE IT KEEPS YOU GUESSINGLIKE ANY REAL LOVE IT'S EVER CHANGINGLIKE ANY TRUE LOVE IT DRIVES YOU CRAZYBUT YOU KNOW YOU WOULDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING ANYTHING ANYTHINGGGG
basically she remains the best middle 8 writer in music, but the chorus is seriously naff. works ok as an opener i guess?
THIS IS THE SONG I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR HOLY SHIT
― j. winters (josh), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
hm
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:47 (ten years ago)
er
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:49 (ten years ago)
http://www.stereogum.com/1712817/taylor-swift-welcome-to-new-york/mp3s/ for anyone who wants to hear the whole thing.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
it sounds really pretty
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
I don't like this ;_;
― Tim F, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
releasing shake it off was a great way to make sure these two other songs have sounded sooo much better
― abcfsk, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:51 (ten years ago)
yeah at the moment i'm unconvinced
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:51 (ten years ago)
*glances upthread at early reactions to "shake it off"*
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:52 (ten years ago)
I feel like Taylor still struggles with songs not about relationships.
― Tim F, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:52 (ten years ago)
― prolego, Monday, October 20, 2014 10:06 PM
and with this obviously also a 'welcome' to her new album experiment and its queer possibilities
― abcfsk, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:52 (ten years ago)
Deep stuff. Totally cry-worthy.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:53 (ten years ago)
kaleidoscope of loud heartbeats under coats
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:53 (ten years ago)
^^^ a better line
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:55 (ten years ago)
it's oddly... inert? i like parts of it (the bridge, the second half of the chorus)? and then they don't do anything together
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:57 (ten years ago)
this album is gonna sound NOTHING like her prior albums huh
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:57 (ten years ago)
*listens to it fifteen times in a row anyway*
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:58 (ten years ago)
probably won't be one of the better songs on the album but i bet it ends up working well as an album opener
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:58 (ten years ago)
the second half of the chorus is alright but the first half's repitition of the title makes her sound like a nyc bus tour guide
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 20:59 (ten years ago)
it's totally an "album opener" but as murgatroid said on facebook it's totally her worst album opener
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 20:59 (ten years ago)
A song about how special and important New York is. :/
― jmm, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
It could've been worse:
"I like New York / Other places make me feel like a dork"
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
i like this though -- it's horribly corny but duh......
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
would've worked better with Madonna's guitar from "I Love NYC"
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
sobering dose of perspective jf
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:01 (ten years ago)
The verses are cool but she didn't write a chorus melody beguiling and satisfying enough to meet the demands of those verses.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:01 (ten years ago)
so what rhymes with Tribeca
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:02 (ten years ago)
discoteca
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:02 (ten years ago)
double decka
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:03 (ten years ago)
Dumped my bags in a loft in Tribeca / spilt my coffee and my heart in an enoteca
― Tim F, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:05 (ten years ago)
"i love new york" is totally corny but it totally owns that knowingly and at least it *sounds* huge and world-conquering. i feel great nyc anthems either have to be that or be really hungry and scrappy and self-assured. this is neither - there needs to be more grit behind the clichés.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:08 (ten years ago)
fly mecca
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:08 (ten years ago)
Oh yeah, I love "I Love New York" despite, and maybe because of, it's obvious flaws.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:09 (ten years ago)
it's a new soundtrack i can dance to this beeaat
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:10 (ten years ago)
ugh i'm being converted
shake it off!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:13 (ten years ago)
Everybody here wanted something more
pretty impressive way to speak to immigrants and gentrifiers alike
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:15 (ten years ago)
http://cdn.frontdoor.com/dims4/SCRIPPS/df6a87b/2147483647/thumbnail/630x473%5E/quality/75/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.frontdoor.com%2F20%2Fdc%2F1faf26f64c4fbbcd98bfce572120%2Ftaylor-swift-tribeca-penthouse.jpg
When we first dropped our bags on apartment floors,
took our broken hearts, put them in a drawer.
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:17 (ten years ago)
this isn't a smash or anything but really feels good as a table setter to me -- the fact that it's both sorta bursting at the seams and yet feels like more is possible is sort of thematically consistent?
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:18 (ten years ago)
welcome to new york / i have a great apartment
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:24 (ten years ago)
well, in Swift's apartments she has pretty table settings
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:25 (ten years ago)
Second time listening to this and the chorus still underwhelming. Should've gotten Sleater Kinney as backing band.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:29 (ten years ago)
the "it's a new soundtrack" half of the chorus is great
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:32 (ten years ago)
the lyrics are p. generic/corny even by her standards AF although i honestly like the kaleidoscopes line. otherwise...it's kinda.....oh goddamnit its really fuckin good.
...although i'll be taking that statement back when it ends up on season 4 of girls and i puke everywhere
― slothroprhymes, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:33 (ten years ago)
She's saving the S-K collab for her "1997" album.
― Don A Henley And Get Over It (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:34 (ten years ago)
wryness aside, it IS impressive how she's managed careerwise to synthesize carly simon's every(rich)girl groundedness and madonna's discipline in regards to output and pop songcraft. granted taylor could still make album 6 with stephin merritt and name it Investopedia (yes, alfred, i KNOW you'd be more excited by that) but she seems smarter than that - already she's putting in the effort to make songs about her haters and her 14m apartment that aren't JUST about her haters and her apartment. makes it seem like she could just keep churning out universalized status updates every two years until she decides to make it an EP every three while the kids are growing up.
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:34 (ten years ago)
Puking all over Tribecafeelin' weak and dismalWe skipped into CVSfor some Pepto Bismol
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:35 (ten years ago)
i guess the thing that stops me from going "lol rich girl" is that getting out of her small town and moving to the big old city, away from small-town conservative norms to where she could be whatever she wanted to be has been a really important t-swift theme from the start and it's feels in a way that everything up till now has been leading directly to this point (and maybe even to being a fully fledged popstar; judging from her recent interviews she's never been this impassioned about her work). but that's also what's making me wish this song is *more* than it is b/c it's a culmination of the past 8 years and the start of something new.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:37 (ten years ago)
granted taylor could still make album 6 with stephin merritt and name it Investopedia (yes, alfred, i KNOW you'd be more excited by that)
with Paul Krugman reciting text over her music and still call it Investopedia. Deal?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:37 (ten years ago)
I accept both those narratives but although I've liked each successive single more the songwriting still feels wobbly and unfocused.
i'm assuming you mean compared to her previous works? cuz as far as pop goes they're plenty focused
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:39 (ten years ago)
or at least as focused as they need to be
There has to be a musical correlative for Swift's tales of white upward mobility, fresher beats at least.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:39 (ten years ago)
― da croupier
Yeah. I thought Red was classic Well-Meaning Failure aesthetically.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:40 (ten years ago)
i honestly can't figure out what you're saying beyond that this stuff doesn't quite float your boat
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:43 (ten years ago)
red was a classic, period.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:44 (ten years ago)
That's...all I've been saying?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:45 (ten years ago)
well then just say that rather than that it was an "aesthetic failure"
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:47 (ten years ago)
are you really arguing that I should have written "I think"?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 21:53 (ten years ago)
hey you can't blame a dude for being let down when it turns out there was nothing behind the jargon other than "she's kinda boring"
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:57 (ten years ago)
this is really not good on one listen
it's not about the corny sentiment because if anyone should pull off a corny sentiment it's taylor swift. especially as her songwriting has been leading towards this particular corny sentiment for half a decade now. but like "shake it off" it's like...where is the giddiness, the total commitment that would make me feel that sentiment, why does it just sound tinny and small and UNDERWRITTEN? taylor swift is not really demonstrating that "repetition for effect" is one of her strengths here.
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 21:59 (ten years ago)
alfred's judgment on red the album would be a fair one were it not based on three out of 16 songs
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:00 (ten years ago)
― da croupier,
well it's a shame there's nothing here except you're being a prick for no reason when I'm offering snap judgments like everyone else
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 22:06 (ten years ago)
yeah I need to relisten to Red in its entirety again -- it's been long enough. "Starlight" is my favorite of hers.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 22:08 (ten years ago)
a totally committed, unabashedly giddy, 80s-sounding album opener that references new york would be... carly rae jepsen's "tiny little bows".
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:10 (ten years ago)
alfred, you're right that i'm picking on you, and i'm sorry. but i don't think calling red "a classic Well-Meaning Failure aesthetically" was a snap judgment you just made, but the kind of pretentious pronouncement it's real tempting to undercut.
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:20 (ten years ago)
tbf i think some of these other snap judgements are pretty hilarious too. imo most new songs sound "tinny and small and underwritten" the first time on computer speakers and i really find "repetition for effect" proves itself over multiple listens.
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:22 (ten years ago)
and i say that as someone who's similarly hand-wrung over underwhelming first takes from artists i had a lot of investment in
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:26 (ten years ago)
i'm...not listening on computer speakers
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:29 (ten years ago)
sorry, that was a presumptuous specific, but those are still the kind of insta-criticisms that can be responded to with "play it a second time, louder"
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:32 (ten years ago)
i don't really think these string of promo singles suit TS particularly well; more than any other pop star she's such an "album artist" that throwing out songs like this for snap judgement don't really do her much justice: her most loved stuff (at least on her last two records) are deep cuts. i guess she's most analogous to beyoncé, who obviously circumvented all of this but if she'd released "drunk in love" and "xo"/"pretty hurts" before the s/t album they would probably have got tepid responses without being framed in the wider context of their albums. certainly "run the world" and "best thing i never had" gave an awful and wrong-headed impression of 4.
that's probably just making excuses and being overly optimistic but i'm gonna keep faith.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:39 (ten years ago)
you hear that everyone, no one's allowed to post reactions to any song itt until at least five listens at different volumes
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:39 (ten years ago)
i think taylor's strings of promo singles pre-release have generally been good
that said this is... not
― dyl, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:41 (ten years ago)
oh well at least we have "out of the woods" still
i just find my first impression of pop songs (especially ones i have serious expectations of) to be kind of clouded and not particularly a sign of how i'll feel about them later, once i'm familiar with what they are rather than what i thought they should be, so i'm surprised when others sound like they don't
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:44 (ten years ago)
she did release "change" and "you're not sorry" as promo singles for fearless, which are probably the album's two worst songs
red's promo releases were flawless though.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:44 (ten years ago)
I'm going to have to go listen to "You're Not Sorry" now because I can't even remember which one it is and Fearless is my favorite of her albums.
― how's life, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:46 (ten years ago)
i've changed my mind about enough pop songs after the first listen to know that already, but this doesn't sound just underwhelming but actively shitty, and i'm certainly open to it growing on me - which i assumed "shake it off" would, actually, but it just ended up getting more intolerable
xps
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:47 (ten years ago)
when i say they're the worst songs i mean they're like 8/10 and not 10/10 like the rest of the album xp
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:48 (ten years ago)
it is pretty weird to me that pre-release promos and singles are now two completely different things
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:48 (ten years ago)
Oh wait, no. That song's amazing. You're so wrong about that song, prolego.
― how's life, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:49 (ten years ago)
i love how after a taylor swift album is released, "single" just becomes an honorary title and an accounting term for the promotional department. that the song "red" was "the fifth single" months after it enjoyed its chart peak
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:51 (ten years ago)
the logic here is clearly to release an antonoff + tedder song as promo before she releases a deluge of max martin songs as actual singles & b/c "out of the woods" and this best represent the 80s sound and nyc concept of the album respectively that are its central themes. rather than them being the best songs.
that's at least what i'm hoping
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:51 (ten years ago)
i love both those songs don't get me wrong! but they're 8/10 rather than 10/10 like every other track on fearless xxxp
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:53 (ten years ago)
the prospect of more max martin songs probably makes it more likely these ARE the best songs :/
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:53 (ten years ago)
also this irksome insistence on POP! is bizarre in that it retroactively categorises, like, "love story" and "you belong with me" and "mine" etc as not-pop
― lex pretend, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:56 (ten years ago)
yeah i'm listening to "hey stephen" right now and oh my god it's just the most wondrous and beautiful and giddy and generous song ever. and the melodies are beyond. just release it now taylor and get your smash hit right there
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 22:58 (ten years ago)
i think the "pop" thing means the new songs are distinctly "not-country" rather than the old songs were "not-pop"
― da croupier, Monday, 20 October 2014 23:02 (ten years ago)
alfred, you're right that i'm picking on you, and i'm sorry.
It's all good. I think we've all demonstrated a capacity to change our minds when saturation airplay hits and we're not on smartphones pecking away at pretentious and/or snap judgments. I'm listening to Red for the first time since December 2012.
As for the single release schedule: she invented this sort of thing in 2008 and '09, right? She's the model that Beyonce, etc keep tweaking. It's like Swift deliberately balkanizes her audience by releasing singles appealing to a segment of her fan base whom she knows will join everybody else when the album's released.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:14 (ten years ago)
i think taylor's conception of POP! has been largely established by max martin teenpop defining the genre so totally in her formative years. she's talked about xtina/britney being music she loved as a child. so it would be natural consequence to go to him to make a ~pop~ record.
― prolego, Monday, 20 October 2014 23:16 (ten years ago)
"hey stephen" is the shit
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:45 (ten years ago)
taylor seems to have a good grip on how the industry works and i could see how she might feel that she would always be tagged as a country artist unless she totally untethered
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:48 (ten years ago)
for as popular as she was generally speaking "you belong with me" was her only real full on pop smash pre-red and even then i think a lot of people still saw her as an interloper of sorts from her "real" community
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:50 (ten years ago)
I wonder what she thinks of country now -- I'd argue she made the critical appreciation for Kacey Musgraves and Kira Isabella easier. It's weird how she hasn't collaborated with the Pistol Annies posse, right? She or her handlers must have considered it, and rejected it because it's "perceived" as too country.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:56 (ten years ago)
when I heard the Musgraves album last year I heard lots of vocal similarities.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:57 (ten years ago)
she basically achieved all there was to achieve in country, and if she couldn't go up the only way to go really was out: she broke all sales records and won all the country awards possible including the "pinnacle award" at 23. and she's far too ambitious to end up feeling like she's stagnating.
it's interesting how there's been such little backlash from the country establishment compared to previous stars that went pop and then never recovered. they need her more than she needs them (especially when they struggle to fill female quotas for award shows now that bro-country dominates the format), and they don't want to alienate a lot of country fans that might dislike pop but like taylor enough now to follow her whatever the genre.
i wonder what shania twain's career trajectory would have been like after up! if she hadn't have effectively retired. taylor's in uncharted territory.
― prolego, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 00:16 (ten years ago)
she's actually probably only able to pull off this country-pop transition so well because the industry is in such a bad state that as the most successful album seller in america today she can wield such clout. this might be the only album released this year that goes platinum.
― prolego, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 00:25 (ten years ago)
yeah it's funny how where madonna around album 5-6 started feeling like she had to stay ahead of the competition and got into this push-pull of wanting both cinematic elegance and transgressive cutting-edge techno, taylor can just be like "hey i'm a 24 year old new york transplant, why wouldn't i be listening to chvrches." while some of the country audience will be alienated, she's still "keeping it real" so she's more like a friend that moved to the big city than someone actively rebuking the normals. and as you say, the industry is in such a bad state that even with losing some red state fans (not to mention some tweens), she'll still be a powerful force.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 00:27 (ten years ago)
also while she's going "pop" and hanging out with lena dunham, "shake it off" and "out of the woods" are no more boundary-pushing as pop than huey lewis or martika respectively
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 00:32 (ten years ago)
i feel so uncomfortable with the total divorcing of pop from home genres. like, pop has become this weird genreless genre that artists are expected to graduate to? ppl with no confidence in either their ability to achieve pop success without going genreless?
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 09:49 (ten years ago)
country's a special case though: lots of people say they like all kinds of music except country. it has a social stigma, in the usa at least. so to "graduate" from country means that people won't scrunch their noses at your music just because of that label. I doubt in Swift's case that it will much improve sales in the usa, since the country audience is huge, music-buying, and built-in for her at this point; and she's decided to shake that off. but sales aren't likely to go way down stateside. dunno what the financial upside is globally in making this move; she's only played one concert here in France, & I rarely hear her music out (unless it's a place with an american fetish). guessing it's like that in europe outside the uk, and in asia, and so on. how much of this is the result of country music being (seen as) a provincial american thing, like Buffalo Bill and Davy Crockett? I suspect it's a substantial reason for that. so shedding her "home genre" has upsides at this point. pop is global, country is american.
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 10:00 (ten years ago)
Pop Country is also basically this weird amalgam of mainstream pop/rock sounds a decade or so old and lyrical content that flatters middle America, with the occasional drawl or guitar signifier of "country". Taylor making a "pop" move just means she no longer wants to play that game. I'm a little bummed that a banjo CAN'T show up in her dance-rock now, but I don't think it's a betrayal of roots.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 13:57 (ten years ago)
shania got referenced upthread and similarly both she and taylor were at one point fans of the pop-country game, and willing to play it, but were always part outside it from the get-go, bringing in external influences and making sure the hooks were crossover-worthy. but taylor, for the benefit of being younger, can claim the natural arc of someone finding herself in adulthood and not needing to hold on to the conservative environment she was raised in (though for all i know going "100% pop" was in her ten-year plan). shania's "i'll release a version with billy currington, and a version with mark mcgrath" moves, like dolly's "i'll make a country album then a pop album then a country album" before her, wound up looking way more craven.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:10 (ten years ago)
ironically, with pop-country now celebrating the 15th anniversary of bawitdaba, taylor would probably have to rap MORE if she stayed country
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:11 (ten years ago)
tbh I don't remember if Shania got flak for Up; by that point in her career to me it looked she and her fans were past the point of carrying. One album aside, Shania was already thinking big. Lange produced her second album, and I have a memory of "You Win My Love" getting a steroid-induced pop radio remix in '95 or '96.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:15 (ten years ago)
carrying = caring
yeah if you read the first sentence of my post re: shania, i said she was always thinking big. but whether or not she got "flak," up only did a quarter of sales of come on over (don't let the RIAA fool you, she got that "double cd" bump to diamond) and only one single from it made the top 5 of the country chart.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:22 (ten years ago)
the previous album having three country #1 singles
granted, we'll never know if Up! was a true New Jersey because she never made a Keep The Faith
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:24 (ten years ago)
tim mcgraw's first hit had a pop radio crossover mix a few years before shania broke, but there's a difference between "hey this radio station's version doesn't have the banjo!" and "ok do i want to buy the hick version or the non-hick version or the 'global' mix..."
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:27 (ten years ago)
I always thought of Swift as only nominally country for many years anyway. Her crowds her past few tours haven't been country crowds, by and large, they've been pop crowds. Screaming kids, parents waiting in the parking lot, that sort of thing. Which is no judgement. But I'd posit that Swift has always been a pop star, just working in the country-ish medium. Country, or this kind of country, is actually the perfect crutch for an up and coming artist. It's got so many rules, so many restrictions and constrictions, simple chords, sometimes simple sentiment, that it doesn't take much to, well, shake it up. Someone like Swift can work in country and really stand out because she's *not* afraid to alienate the country establishment, which is easy to alienate, and besides which doesn't really represent who she is (or who she became, at least), or even what she ever was. The problem, if there is one, is that she is not equally confident/capable/convincing in the pop field, yet, which has much fewer restrictions, which in her case I think might actually cause her to be more cautious. She's feeling her way through a new field, just unfortunately at maximum visibility, with high profile collabs, etc. It's like she's literally trying to break in.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
thing is, taylor's goal has never been a "i shake things up, upend the norms, that's my goal" thing, but a "i'm just me, and if that shakes things up, so be it" thing. she's a "new normal" MOR act, so when she goes pop that's water reaching its level - it's possible, but i kinda doubt she's going to go radiohead on us.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:52 (ten years ago)
I don't think the country audience is easy to alienate, once you're "one of them". like I would expect her back catalog to continue to sell to the country audience for years to come.
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:53 (ten years ago)
I don't think the country audience is easy to alienate, once you're "one of them
http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/rftmusic/ChrisGainesBlue.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:57 (ten years ago)
http://www.savingcountrymusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/johnny-cash-middle-finger-billboard.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 14:59 (ten years ago)
Obviously there have been a bunch of pop or rock acts who have cynically gone country, but I'm trying to think of other country singers who have gone pop or rock (and not gone back). Hmm ...
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:00 (ten years ago)
yeah I guess I was thinking by "alienate" you meant that the already-accepted catalog would get tossed, & that's not gonna happen here. she could easily put out a banjo remix of some new song, or keep putting out folky songs on soundtracks, and they'll still get play in the country world.
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:02 (ten years ago)
whoa I didn't realize Garth had married Trisha Yearwood, nice job you two!
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:03 (ten years ago)
Josh, how about Wynonna Judd? arguably she's gone back to country, but never full-heartedly
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:05 (ten years ago)
now Trisha can peddle her Sandra Lee-lite garbage on the Food Network.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:06 (ten years ago)
But I'd posit that Swift has always been a pop star, just working in the country-ish medium.
yes, this is what i'm saying. she was a crossover act in the first place, certainly from fearless on, and it was always explicitly a teenpop/disney channel crossover (though you could argue that mid-00s teenpop was a niche genre itself). i get what she's doing industry-wise, ambition-wise, why she's saying what she's saying, but i don't get her pre-red work being retrospectively portrayed as some sort of only-tru-country-heads anti-mainstream discography. or IS that the state of pop/the charts/the industry now? i feel like, even aside from taylor, pop is defined in increasingly narrow terms in terms of who you can collaborate with, what sonic template you choose etc. like, it's no longer making what you do accessible and widely appealing, but going to a very narrow site of what is already accessible and widely appealing, which is currently some unholy "all about the bass" x "happy" ground.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:08 (ten years ago)
hah
"Later that year, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine included Home Cooking with Trisha Yearwood on their list of the "The Five Worst Cookbooks of 2010", noting its recipes are "loaded with fat and cholesterol" and specifically citing one called "Garth’s Breakfast Bowl" which "includes eight large eggs, a pound each of bacon and sausage, cheese tortellini, cheddar cheese, tater tots, and B.O.B (Bowl Of Butter)."[54]"
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:08 (ten years ago)
Garth should open up a Nashville bowling alley with an all you can eat breakfast buffet called Garth's Breakfast Bowl.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:10 (ten years ago)
Huh, when was Wynonna anything but country?
Hmm, how about Olivia Newton John?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:12 (ten years ago)
lol forever @ 'Garth's breakfast bowl'
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
re Wynonna: ""Sing" is the title of a song written by Rodney Crowell and recorded by American country artist, Wynonna Judd. The song was the second single released from her 2009 studio album, Sing: Chapter 1. After failing to chart on the Billboard Hot Country Songs chart, the song was given several electronic dance remixes, and sent to dance radio where it peaked at #4 on the Hot Dance Club Songs chart in August 2009."
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:15 (ten years ago)
important poll here: Garth's Breakfast Bowl
― droit au butt (Euler), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:18 (ten years ago)
i feel like, even aside from taylor, pop is defined in increasingly narrow terms in terms of who you can collaborate with, what sonic template you choose etc. like, it's no longer making what you do accessible and widely appealing, but going to a very narrow site of what is already accessible and widely appealing, which is currently some unholy "all about the bass" x "happy" ground.
That Swift in 2012 was one of the artists who most benefited from changing chart tabulation is one the ironies.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:18 (ten years ago)
"Welcome to New York" is pretty thin. I like the synth-pop sonics, but ehhhhh. Seems like trollbait to drive dudes like Jeremiah's Vanishing New York crazy.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 15:33 (ten years ago)
i don't get her pre-red work being retrospectively portrayed as some sort of only-tru-country-heads anti-mainstream discography.
is anyone really doing this, though? she's basically just john mellencamp leaving the "cougar" out of his name for the first time - he's not saying his previous work was unrelated, just shucking a constraining moniker. i mean maybe there's some dimbulb press release regurgitators with a five-year memory span pushing this, but i think anyone with a clue knows her going "pop" just means she won't be playing "shake it off" with a dobro on the cmas just to prove she can.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:05 (ten years ago)
now if she makes a video for "welcome to new york" where a dobro catches fire as she drives out of nashville flipping the bird out her window then we'll talk
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:13 (ten years ago)
bringing up chris gaines underscores just how natural an evolution this is for her - also that she's going to benefit greatly from being a decade or so younger than most megastars with 4-5 albums and 20-30 songs that will make audiences shit their pants. if she DID go down the wrong road, she won't pull back to find herself playing the nostalgia market and scaring teenagers quite yet
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
she's not a 40 year old dying her hair red and saying my name is Tay-Tay Brooklynpants
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:23 (ten years ago)
my favorite thing about "shake it off" is the "mm-hmm"s, which are STRAIGHT out of country music, nobody but taylor (or miley) could pull it off
i dunno you guys, after hearing "shake it off" approx 4 times a day for the last month it's FUCKIN CATCHY AS FUCK
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
Like ebola.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:57 (ten years ago)
Oh hello, new display name.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
da croupier i would watch the shit out of that hypothetical dobro-burning video
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 17:28 (ten years ago)
http://cdn9.logicplugins.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/dobro-solo.png
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 17:29 (ten years ago)
she's literally been saying in interviews that she's always played around with lots of pop sensibilities but this is the first album she's 'calling' pop
― uberweiss, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 17:54 (ten years ago)
i think a lot of the 'calling' it pop thing is about just completely sidestepping the "should country stations even play this, should Billboard put it on country charts" drama that attended Red.
― some dude, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 18:23 (ten years ago)
Seems like trollbait to drive dudes like Jeremiah's Vanishing New York crazy.
And on cue:
Jeremiah's Vanishing New YorkTaylor Swift's "Welcome to NY" = "the gentrification anthem we didn't need."
He's linking to this: http://jezebel.com/taylor-swifts-new-song-is-the-gentrification-anthem-nyc-1648607040
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 18:40 (ten years ago)
i like this commentThis is almost as bad as the time that neocon shitlord Elvis wrote Viva Las Vegas, which thoughtlessly celebrated the city and totally failed to address its high divorce rates, unstable housing market and contribution to gambling addiction.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 18:53 (ten years ago)
it's just gonna be awful hard for anybody working for gawker media to get too on their high horse about gentrification
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 18:54 (ten years ago)
i mean, it's not gonna be hard at all given that they seem to remain completely oblivious to or misguided about or accepting of their boss's robber-baron status and corruption (or in many cases their own privilege, etc.)...whether or not they should is an entirely different matter
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
(hint: they fucking shouldn't)
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:32 (ten years ago)
Foisting gentrification and racism onto Taylor's shoulders because she made the next entry in a long tradition of songs about the bright lights, big city dream-fulfilling potential of New York is just ridiculous.
― Greer, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:32 (ten years ago)
to be clear, i think it's fine to laugh about her gentrification anthem and find fault in it, i'd just avoid self-righteous anger if you're also a transplant
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:36 (ten years ago)
that said, part of me wants to give the writer props for embedding one of come home with me's best tracks (obligatory DIPSET shouts)
croupier i agree and meant more or less the same thing - it's the hypocrisy that's the problem, as is so often the case with the outrage of the gawkerati
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 19:38 (ten years ago)
And by the way f**k you Frank Sinatra for your fake, rose-tinted version of a rotten city.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:01 (ten years ago)
If you can make it there with 200 million dollars, you can make it anywhere with 200 million dollars.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:07 (ten years ago)
I don't find Welcome to New York necessarily bad? I like it sonically, though the lyrics sound somewhat generic and throwaway; it doesn't seem she has anything particularly interesting to say about this. Anyway, I hope the average track on the album will be better than this.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:08 (ten years ago)
to add to the tsweezy thinkpiece jamboree - http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/taylor-swift-welcome-to-new-york/
rembert browne is usually astute and/or funny about pop culture but how can you take shit like this song THAT seriously?
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 20:56 (ten years ago)
i think it's almost impressive that t-swift has managed to attract the very worst pop music thinkpieces consistently for half a decade now.
like boo fucking hoo 22 was a shit age for you slumming it in nyc that you can't deal with hearing a song detailing a fun night out with friends at that age? seriously?
― prolego, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:18 (ten years ago)
i mean, i understand being somewhat annoyed by it, or whatever, and sure she has superficial ideas of some of these things but ultimately it doesn't affect the lives of (or genuinely mock the struggles of) average-income young folks in NYC or any other city.
so I DON'T understand the need to write that many words about it other than for DEM CLICKZ. for a person creating art that actually kind of mocks that struggle (possibly without intention), see, "Dunham, Lena," which is its own oft-beaten dead horse, of course
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:25 (ten years ago)
As her career progressed, I liked her less. It seemed to me that she epitomized women's lib as an upper-middle-class movement. Girls and young women empathized with her problems and her projected independence without understanding that her independence was primarily a function of economic privilege.
xgau on carly simon, forty years ago
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:33 (ten years ago)
I've seen variants with Beyonce replacing Simon.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:39 (ten years ago)
well you'll see variants any time a woman doesn't properly humble herself
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:40 (ten years ago)
I wonder what year these male critics' wives reminded them that paternalism is condescension spelled differently.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:53 (ten years ago)
judging from his yeah yeah yeah reviews i'm not sure xgau got that note
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 21:54 (ten years ago)
This is almost as bad as the time that neocon shitlord Elvis wrote Viva Las Vegas, which thoughtlessly celebrated the city and totally failed to address its high divorce rates, unstable housing market and contribution to gambling addiction.
lmao
― example (crüt), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:02 (ten years ago)
Kinda agree the song's about nothing or rather it's New York specific signifiers are so nonexistant that you could make this song about almost any new start and not do much to alter its message. Without the NY namedrop it just becomes a song about cities as centers of change and transition in general. Though it certainly fits into pre-existing Swiftian lyrical narratives ala "Mean".
― Greer, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:06 (ten years ago)
I'd argue she made the critical appreciation for Kacey Musgraves and Kira Isabella easier. It's weird how she hasn't collaborated with the Pistol Annies posse, right? She or her handlers must have considered it, and rejected it because it's "perceived" as too country.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 October 2014 23:56 (Yesterday) Permalink
Not really, no. Miranda Lambert has done 10-fold what Taylor has to set the stage for Kacey and a host of other country artists behind her—both with critics and fans.
Maybe the reason Miranda and Taylor haven't collaborated isn’t "her handlers" but rather that they’re not friends who would benefit in any way from collaborating? They’re totally different artists from two totally different worlds.
Lambert is distinctly West Texas (same place Kacey’s from), and is cut from the same cloth as Loretta Lynn and Emmylou Harris. She is older, married, hunts, and plays with a backing band ~20-30 years older than her. She generally plays arenas away from big cities, and at her shows, you see a lot of men in camo.
IMO, Swift’s country background is overemphasized. She was born and raised in East Pennsylvania, closer to New Jersey than Nashville. By her second album, she was collaborating with Colbie Caillat, co-touring with Justin Bieber, and singing Justin Timberlake covers live to mostly teenage girls her age. On the Fearless tour, her backing band looked like Paramore. Her Instagram feed is filled with pictures of Europe and sailing trips with 20-somethings.
It’s not surprising to me at all that as their careers have progressed, the two have moved farther and farther apart in sound and style. I’d bet good money that Musgraves charts a path closer to Lambert than Swift; her hero is Willie Nelson--I’d be surprised if Swift’s ever heard one of his albums.
― Indexed, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:18 (ten years ago)
I bet that Musgraves doesn't have as many James Taylor records as Taylor, though.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:32 (ten years ago)
i mean who knows what tay really thinks about ray price on one end of the time-spectrum and drive-by truckers on the other zomg what if she isn't authentic
that said kacey musgraves is pretty great (but for entirely different and equally valid reasons)
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:40 (ten years ago)
^ By the way, I love both Lambert and Swift, and if anything I thought the latter's first two albums were MORE authentic. I just think Alfred was lazily lumping two totally different artists together because, hey, they're both from Nashville and acceptable to like.
― Indexed, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:42 (ten years ago)
Miranda Lambert has done 10-fold what Taylor has to set the stage for Kacey and a host of other country artists behind her—both with critics and fans.
Yes, she has, as last year's bounty proved. But I hear more Swift in Musgraves' songwriting and singing voices than Lambert. You're right about where Lambert will go, and likely right about Swift, but "Follow Your Arrow" sounds like a Fearless-era Swift track, "Step Off" like a cousin of "Mean."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:44 (ten years ago)
I bet Swift has more than one Linda Ronstadt album in her collection.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:47 (ten years ago)
On the Fearless tour, her backing band looked like Paramore
Going off topic perhaps, but, not really. Her backing band that's mostly been the same from the start has basically looked the same from the start: Ie like 30-40 somethings who maybe want to look like Paramore but only shop at Hot Topic and look hilariously unfashionable. And it's kind of sweet that they've stayed looking as bad and out of touch for so long and really does not suggest a closer connection to hip teen fans. Mainly talking about the two dudes with the hairdos here.
Slightly more nitpicking - her instagram from europe (life)style is recent, I was actually surprised when Speak Now was released how much she stuck to her old country aesthetic for so long after she had branched out musically.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:48 (ten years ago)
I hear more Musgraves in "Mama's Broken Heart." Oh wait...
― Indexed, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:48 (ten years ago)
xpost Not that it matters, but Swift was born and raised more than just in "East Pennsylvania" which at least sounds sorta rural or country but actually in an affluent suburb of Reading (home of discount shopping!). I grew up not far from there, and my friend was raised in the place that became lil' Taylor's place. Also, per wiki, "Her father, Scott Kingsley Swift, is a Merrill Lynch financial adviser and the descendant of three generations of bank presidents." Doesn't make her any less or more authentic, especially since authenticity is not her goal, imo, as much as emotional honesty is, which lends itself well to any genre, country and pop. Whereas being blue collar tends to lend itself more to the proscriptions of country, which frowns (generally speaking) on the aspirational themes of much pop. Country is often about what you don't have rather than what you want, where you're from rather than where you are. Which is why Tim and Faith I could have sworn wrote a song about moving in with a parent, even though, yeah right.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:50 (ten years ago)
well isn't that remarkable
xpost
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 22:50 (ten years ago)
taylor paved the way for kacey's critical acclaim only insofar as kacey could be positioned as the anti-taylor: a young, pretty female country (but not offputtingly country!) singer - but who sang about REAL SHIT not princesses and fairytales.
if only "welcome to new york" had anything to do with gentrification, it might actually have something specific to it.
that rembert browne piece is barely even a piece, it just reads like he doesn't like or care about taylor swift and doesn't particularly want to write about her, but he does hate what she represents to him. boring.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:09 (ten years ago)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:53 PM (1 hour ago)
rembert browne is Just A Guy to me so i have no interest in staining for him or anything, but i don't find his piece paternalistic at all. i've loved a lot of taylor swift music but calling it vacuous and/or indifferent to the lives of ordinary/poor people seems pretty obvious
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:27 (ten years ago)
Vacuous? Are you high?
― how's life, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:30 (ten years ago)
huh?
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:31 (ten years ago)
I wish I was.
― markers, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:32 (ten years ago)
it just reads like he doesn't like or care about taylor swift and doesn't particularly want to write about her, but he does hate what she represents to him.
Yeah isn't it obnoxious when people do that, lex?
That Rembert piece is kind of whatever, but the reflexive boxing in of any dude's criticisms of Taylor as sexist, as if their can't be valid reasons to not connect with her music is a bit too convenient. That her various privileges and the way they do or don't manifest in her music might alienate some people and turn them off her is not an unwelcome approach to talking about her, this just feels like the weakest song on which to make this case since this song could've been written by just about any major popstar bar a few lyrics here and there.
― Greer, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:35 (ten years ago)
― k3vin k.
was referring to xgau
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:38 (ten years ago)
That Rembert piece is kind of whatever, but the reflexive boxing in of any dude's criticisms of Taylor as sexist, as if their can't be valid reasons to not connect with her music is a bit too convenient.
fair enough, though i have a hard time imagining people getting too self-righteous about any dude from drake to mick jagger sharing their joys and pain despite their economic privilege
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:41 (ten years ago)
"let's go get 40s, julian casablancas? unlike you, forties are all i could AFFORD"
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:44 (ten years ago)
I've read plenty of people doing that to Drake. And Kanye. And Jay-Z. Not so much Mick Jagger.
― Greer, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:52 (ten years ago)
wonder why
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:53 (ten years ago)
will admit rappers get this grief too, pretend i said julian casablancas, mick jagger and i dunno, the dude from the national, he went to private prep
― da croupier, Tuesday, 21 October 2014 23:57 (ten years ago)
"and THEN i remembered what california means to people like phantom planet"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:02 (ten years ago)
was referring to xgau― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:38 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:38 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
My bad k3vin. Should have avoided calling you out on being high when I was, in fact, myself high.
― how's life, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:04 (ten years ago)
Why'd you only call me out when you're high?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:13 (ten years ago)
― Greer, Tuesday, October 21, 2014 11:52 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, October 21, 2014 11:53 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
love this
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:28 (ten years ago)
tbf "vacuous" was a poor choice of words, i don't think taylor is dumb! but i do think the breadth of her subject matter is a bit...limited, and she's fair game for criticism on those grounds imo
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:31 (ten years ago)
Breadth of subject matter isn't fair criticism.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 00:43 (ten years ago)
maybe not breadth for breadth's sake, but focusing exclusively on the lifestyles of the white and the middle-class, without much awareness that lives are being lived around you -- which is essentially what that browne post, which was admittedly a fluff piece, was asserting -- seems to be grounds for fair criticism
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 22 October 2014 01:15 (ten years ago)
Because 22 year old immigrants couldn't possibly be having a good time in ny and see it as a place for people who want something more
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 01:33 (ten years ago)
xpost I think that's right in the abstract, but, because it could be used as a stick to beat 98% of contemporary music, when it's leveled at one particular artist or group of artists it always comes across like that's not really what is in issue for the writer.
I think this is less of a problem for TV criticism (though it still can be) because many TV shows hold themselves out (consciously or otherwise) as depicting a fully-articulated cross-section of a particular society.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 01:34 (ten years ago)
Because people would so be down for Taylor swift's "another day in paradise"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 01:35 (ten years ago)
In terms of the Browne piece in particular, I think basically his underlying assumption is that pop only "works" to the extent that it is relatable, and if Taylor isn't speaking to Browne's own notion of being 22 or moving out of home or being in new york (and specifically how all three relate to Browne's experience of going to college) then it cannot work for him.
I'm not sure that he'd apply that same standard to other music he listens to, and I'm also not sure what Taylor is supposed to "do" to get on his right side. Sing Phil Collins jams about homeless people?
XPOST OMG
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 01:47 (ten years ago)
― Tim F, Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:34 PM (26 minutes ago)
yeah agreed. taylor in particular has been the target of so many misogynist/rockist screeds over the years that the motives of the writers should fairly be scrutinized
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:02 (ten years ago)
Oh, give her time. I hope it doesn't come sooner than 15 years from now, though.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:06 (ten years ago)
Yesterday I was talking to a student at the office about what she was listening to: Flying Lotus, Tinashe, Sade. When I asked about T-Swift she smiled. "All she does is write about her boyfriends." Why, I asked, because she said so? And Tinashe doesn't? She admitted, yeah, of course she does too. That Swift depends on autobiography/fame for material repulses the haters as much as it endears her to fans.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:18 (ten years ago)
http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/yourcommunity/2014/10/taylor-swift-accidentally-releases-8-seconds-of-white-noise-tops-canadian-itunes-chart.html?cmp=fbtl
― fgti, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:38 (ten years ago)
30 seconds of a new one in a target commercial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eDUf6TGuMs&feature=youtu.be
it's this one from the rolling stone feature
Then there's the song that sets a new high-water mark for Swiftian faux secrecy – a sexy Miami Vice-sounding throwback about a guy with slicked-back hair and a white T-shirt and a girl in a tight little skirt that is called – no joke – "Style."
not sure i hear miami vice but it sounds pretty good tho, better than "welcome to new york" in that lane
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:44 (ten years ago)
it sounds like a sexy throwback to last week's Target commercial
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:47 (ten years ago)
Good to see Taylor and I are in agreement that Take Me Home is 1D's best album.
― Greer, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 02:50 (ten years ago)
There's more of Taylor in that 30-second clip of "Style" than in all of "Welcome To New York".
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 03:15 (ten years ago)
yeah it's way more dynamic
"welcome to new york" still in my head
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 06:56 (ten years ago)
the thing is "welcome to new york" isn't EVEN particularly about taylor's white, privileged milieu, and this is actually one of its biggest flaws because it's so vague and lacking in meaningful detail. it's not like she's singing about artisan coffee shops or whatever signifiers of gentrification actually exist. a crowd of people and bright lights and an apartment and uh that's it. it's probably one of the least detailed of pop's many, many odes to cities ever. it could be about any city! possibly this is intentional, in that reducing every feeling to obnoxious attempts at universality appears to be her "thing" on this album, but the only way you can really argue this is an ode to privilege and gentrification is if you already think taylor swift represents those things (which she does! but they're not in this song)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 08:23 (ten years ago)
also i tried to listen to it again and actually got so bored and irritated that i stopped midway through which has never happened with a taylor swift single before :(
agree with lex's take.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 12:32 (ten years ago)
Yup. She's good on emotional details, but does not seem terribly observant of the world outside interpersonal relations.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 12:57 (ten years ago)
Songs on any other topic are almost always her weakest.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:11 (ten years ago)
yeah i feel like the "she only writes about her love life" thing would've had a lot more weight had it been framed as "she only writes well about relationships, romantic and otherwise" (not that that's exactly a narrow range for a songwriter)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:15 (ten years ago)
she's also at her worst when she's trying to be funny, and she makes me wince almost every time she goes meta w/r/t her public image...and those are what i fear most from this album
as well as the shitty, thin production ofc
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:17 (ten years ago)
she's also at her worst when she's trying to be funny, and she makes me wince almost every time she goes meta w/r/t her public image
ha this is literally the description of track 2, "blank space"
everything else on the album, bar "shake it off", is about about a relationship of some kind tho.
― prolego, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:30 (ten years ago)
Are any about her cats?
http://www.highonscore.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/p16htdgqi48do1dju1h6k1tn51jg83.jpg
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:32 (ten years ago)
lex and tim otm, yet
boys and boys and girls and girls
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:47 (ten years ago)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 13:17 (2 hours ago) Permalink
Yes, yes, yes.
There are people (elsewhere) comparing it to Robyn's "Call Your Girlfriend," which is all kinds of wrong. The intro seems like a bad attempt at replicating Martin Solveig's "Hello." The tinny little synth riff that dominates the song is problematic; it makes her "IT'S BEEN WAITING FOR YOU!"s and "NEW YORK!"s--which I would normally find endearing--unfortunately grating for me. And I'm not a fan of the whole chant-singing thing.
There's a decent song here, but the track desperately needs the muscle of a "Call Your Girlfriend," especially when the second half of the chorus drops.
― Indexed, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 15:45 (ten years ago)
It's not a coincidence that the best part of the song is when she actually sings.
― Indexed, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 15:53 (ten years ago)
http://www.vulture.com/2014/10/taylor-swift-track-3-8-seconds-of-white-noise.html?mid=twitter_vulture
...BEST SONG OF 2014 (also an outstanding example of wringing content from a complete nonstory for the sake of DEM CLICKZ but i clicked so i'm part of the problem)
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 16:50 (ten years ago)
oh c'mon a tech glitch hitting #1 on itunes is a valid lol - that puts it way above most DEM CLICKZ non stories
― da croupier, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
true, it is #actually funny and that's an automatic leg up
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:02 (ten years ago)
I've never been more proud of my country.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
the sad thing is that most readers of music news would consider actual non-stories more of a "story" than this story.
― katherine, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/Znck25G.jpg
― uberweiss, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 20:30 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:47 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i have no idea what the "yet" about this is
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 22 October 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
I Wish You Would (Tell Me I Ain't Hip Hop)
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 23 October 2014 01:14 (ten years ago)
oh i like that line and the delivery of that line
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 October 2014 04:25 (ten years ago)
it just seems like well-meaning but uninteresting pandering
― lex pretend, Thursday, 23 October 2014 07:35 (ten years ago)
NYT album review
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 23 October 2014 12:06 (ten years ago)
i've only read caramanica's reviews of rap albums (which have all been pretty good). this should be interesting.
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:14 (ten years ago)
the Times couldn't resist including a photo of one of Swift's purported boyfriends eh
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:18 (ten years ago)
of course they couldn't. "for whom the belle trolls," i LOLed
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:21 (ten years ago)
But don’t be distracted by for whom the belle trolls; she trolls with glee, and that’s what matters.
It's a good review, not least because it underscores her smart and savvy (I don't think cynical) self-positioning. She masters Nashville, so she moves to a place where she can be the outsider underdog again. She wants to go pop, but does it conservatively, which again sets her apart from all the hybrid pop out there. She can play the I'm just a big goofball card, because it inures her against criticisms of cultural appropriation, or ineptness, or whatever. Yet it's polished shiny bright, because she's no dummy, and would never (at least not yet) take any real risks without providing a million safety nets. Though of course massive success is in and of itself a huge safety net, in her case, especially since she made her bucks in the most loyal and constrained of fields, country, so if this phase flops or passes, she can always go back. But as she rides this out, I hope she widens her ambition a little bit, because being the best MOR you can be is a pretty weak victory, and really, in the end, I am still rooting for to do more. This pop turn seems, disconcertingly, literally effortless. I want to see her sweat.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:32 (ten years ago)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XF2ayWcJfxo/hqdefault.jpg
she's gonna stream this album in the next 36 hours right?
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:39 (ten years ago)
i'd assume so, because while it hasn't leaked yet i'm almost positive it will soon, regardless of her paranoia about such things.
― slothroprhymes, Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:56 (ten years ago)
The physical CD is out in some places this Friday so it will probably be "out there" in full by Friday night.
― Greer, Thursday, 23 October 2014 14:10 (ten years ago)
and on spotify next year ;_;
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 23 October 2014 15:24 (ten years ago)
hey i can totally be charmed by the cadence of someone pandering to me
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:12 (ten years ago)
new prince single "pander 2 u"
not sure why the "positioned against hip-hop" thing is news, since that's been the case at least since "You Belong To Me"
― katherine, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:15 (ten years ago)
someone should tell caramanica that 80s pop was emulated off black music too - huey lewis and phil collins didn't invent the horn section
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:27 (ten years ago)
like yes, she doesnt have bobby shmurda show up, but a song that emulates phil collins, "hey ya" and has an awkward rap break preceded by "this...sick...beat" is not unreliant on hip-hop and r&b
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
not to mention a chorus that goes "haters gonna hate, players gonna play"
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:36 (ten years ago)
she should have bobby shmurda show up tho
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:37 (ten years ago)
plenty of time left for a remix
dude also fudges the facts in the video - she fumbles in front of dancers of multiple styles, not just hip-hop. but why let that get in the way of a good thesis re taylor's "oppositional" move
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
'emulates phil collins' is now a factual defining feature of "Shake It Off"? i know you love that parallel man but give it a rest
― some dude, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:43 (ten years ago)
no, hater
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
i'm responded to a claim that she's emulating r&b-free pop, sorry if your ass clenches every time i use a proper noun you wouldn't
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:45 (ten years ago)
it's less about music theory, more about positioning -- I don't see how you can argue with that
― katherine, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:50 (ten years ago)
she's positioning herself as more MOR for sure, but taking the leap from "trying to be hip, trying to be square" to "ripping off black music, not ripping off black music" is an ill advised one
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:51 (ten years ago)
'emulating' just seems to be projecting an unconfirmed influence in a way that 'echoing' or 'recalling' wouldn't
although i do like the idea of Taylor Swift performing a single called "The Miracle (of Phil Collins)" while footage of Genesis and Mike + The Mechanics is projected over her silhouette
― some dude, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:10 (ten years ago)
sorry, didn't realize it was my verb choice that was causing undue stress
also she named the album 1989, can't imagine its too much of a leap to assume she's heard the most prominent horn-chart pushers of that era
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:13 (ten years ago)
"sussudio? what's a sussudio?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWptXUblA4E
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
along with stevie i should apologize to billy ocean for not throwing him a shout-out yet
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
sorry i didn't realize this thread had you in permanent war mode, i was just messing around.
― some dude, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:16 (ten years ago)
you're overstating how much effort it takes to respond harshly to your pestering
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:18 (ten years ago)
also it's fun
i mean if your idea of "messing around" is to say "stop saying phil collins...well, i mean that verb is just a bit presumptuous" get ready for an idea of "messing around" that bats away your quibbles like a gnat
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
now we're sharing the same dream
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:26 (ten years ago)
My dream is to go back to a time when I was anxious to hear this record.
― how's life, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:36 (ten years ago)
haha i wanna hear it, but in large part to find out what other old shit i can reference
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:39 (ten years ago)
also i belatedly discovered "red" is my favorite t-swift song ever and i'm hoping there's more melodramatic dance-rock here
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
I hope there's rock of some kind in there.
― how's life, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
I hope there's rock specifically of the 3rd kind
― I can't make my waterface turn into a *fart* (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:50 (ten years ago)
sike, I don't give a fuck if there's rock in there. I'm just not into any of the songs she's released from it yet.
― how's life, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:55 (ten years ago)
"Red" is my fav too! (or. at least definitely top 3)
― some dude, Thursday, 23 October 2014 17:57 (ten years ago)
i want this record to sound like george michael and cyndi lauper but i already know it doesn't
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
not Cyndi Lauper in '89 though
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
i dunno why there couldn't be a "i drove all night" here
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:08 (ten years ago)
aaaaand with that i might as well share this playlist i made
http://anthonyisright.tumblr.com/post/100411575549/1989-inspired-by-1989-jenny-lewis-sunglasses
― da croupier, Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:10 (ten years ago)
now see Taylor can do a "Summer Rain" knockoff
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:12 (ten years ago)
looking forward to the shep pettibone remix of this record
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bsb_Ke8KqM
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:13 (ten years ago)
When I heard "1989" and "NYC" I thought maybe she'd might not be able to pull off a Open Letter to a Landlord, but maybe a Glamour Boys.
― how's life, Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:16 (ten years ago)
she's fierce!
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 October 2014 18:16 (ten years ago)
Oh oh oh oh. http://www.rdio.com/artist/Terabrite/album/Out_Of_The_Woods/
― glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 23 October 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
And http://open.spotify.com/album/0TMnkeCdSao4dtTXc8ZWX8
― glenn mcdonald, Friday, 24 October 2014 13:20 (ten years ago)
new rule don't post albums itt UNLESS IT'S THE NEW TAYLOR SWIFT ALBUM
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 13:43 (ten years ago)
new rule everybody hold really still until i say dance
― glenn mcdonald, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:10 (ten years ago)
wow and here i assumed spotify was sending me to knockoffs by accident
― da croupier, Friday, 24 October 2014 14:23 (ten years ago)
found it
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 15:38 (ten years ago)
Yeah, it's leaked.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 15:42 (ten years ago)
omg
― prolego, Friday, 24 October 2014 15:46 (ten years ago)
61mb
this is not hq is it
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 15:57 (ten years ago)
also, these are .wmas, lol
lol that probably means i downloaded the wrong thing
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:00 (ten years ago)
leaks are hilarious
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:01 (ten years ago)
#normcore
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:03 (ten years ago)
^^^ downloaded Heart in Motion by accident
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:04 (ten years ago)
Whoever said this would be like Heartthrob was otm.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:04 (ten years ago)
So does that make "Shake it Off" sound out of place on the album? Cause that doesn't really sound like anything from Hearthrob.
― MarkoP, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:06 (ten years ago)
shake it off is an outlier to a degree that's downright comical, based on listening to 5 tracks thus far
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:08 (ten years ago)
*Removes bookmark from thread*
Respect the release date guys!!
― 龜, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:08 (ten years ago)
Oh yeah it feels really out of place in context of the rest of this.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:12 (ten years ago)
instrumentation of "style" improbably designed just for me
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:13 (ten years ago)
3 tracks in
best album i[ve heard in my entire life oh my god
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
I Wish You Would is some oh shit
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:21 (ten years ago)
"style" is ridic
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
every song so far is incredible apart from the two shit singles and "bad blood"
the rest, oh my god
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:42 (ten years ago)
"wildest dreams"!!!!
and yes "style" was the moment i realised this album was going to be amazing
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:43 (ten years ago)
btw my first listen to this is perched in a café while texting my bf not to meet me for another hour
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
New Romance is basically a pepped up Lorde song (and also amazing).
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:44 (ten years ago)
Any pointers where to find this would be appreciated guys
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:47 (ten years ago)
newalbumreleases dot net
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:49 (ten years ago)
tyyyy!
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:50 (ten years ago)
honestly at this point i'd be ready to call "shake it off" a classic if it wasn't for the bridge
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:51 (ten years ago)
hi guys
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 16:53 (ten years ago)
I'm in
as fun as it is (again, disregarding the bridge and all that awkwardness), its too reminiscent of that noxious avril song and by extension hey mickey for me to actually enjoy it
style is a no-fucking-around classic pop song for sure, need to hear past track 6 thus far
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:57 (ten years ago)
otm and i kind of love the karmic punishment of the Hot 100 saying "close, but no meghan trainor" week after week
― da croupier, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:57 (ten years ago)
I am growing to like the horrible bridge. I'm sure it's mostly through blunt-force repetition.
― how's life, Friday, 24 October 2014 16:59 (ten years ago)
just when you think you've got the MOR slang appropriation of the year some damn kid shows up bringing booty back
― da croupier, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:00 (ten years ago)
― how's life, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:01 (ten years ago)
"clean" is quite some closer
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:05 (ten years ago)
the other tedder joint "i know places" is GARBAGE
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:06 (ten years ago)
this album is pretty much wonderful apart from Those Two Singles (stop being so fucking basic you people, nothing to defend about "shake it off"). going to listen the hell out of it all winter. it's wrap-your-coat-around-yourself-walking-in-the-snow music
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:06 (ten years ago)
possibly it loses a bit of steam in the second half but i couldn't work out whether that was just because i'd quite like to leave this café and go to the pub now
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:07 (ten years ago)
why is this taking so long for me nooooooo I CAN'T WAIT ANOTHER HOUR
― prolego, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
so "New Romance" is T-Swift's "Let's Go to Bed," right?
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
someone just transcribe the voice memos pls i don't have seven minutes to be spending on them right now
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:08 (ten years ago)
i really hate that i have to credit jack bloody antonoff with whatever assistance he provided here. did he produce anything other than out of the woods to anyone's knowledge?
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:09 (ten years ago)
bonus track "you r in love" sounds EXACTLY like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiLosOQP400
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:09 (ten years ago)
one of the reviews mentioned greg kurstin. i don't know if it's confirmed or not but i'm crediting him with all the nuance in the shellback songs anyway
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:12 (ten years ago)
very happy for lex's sake that "shake it off" can be murked from the tracklisting seamlessly
still danced to it on the way to work
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
p craven that "bad blood" sorta resembles "e.t."
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
wow craven isn't the right word brad
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:21 (ten years ago)
greg kurstin is no more likely than jack antonoff to be responsible for anything good
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:21 (ten years ago)
lex delivers
i don't know if it's confirmed or not but i'm crediting him with all the nuance in the shellback songs anyway
send him an e-mail saying "all i want to do is to thank you"
― da croupier, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:24 (ten years ago)
"this love" is gorgeous, nathan chapman should produce more synth pop
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:26 (ten years ago)
"new romance" !!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:28 (ten years ago)
Aside from "Out of the Wood", I know "I Wish You Would" and "You Are in Love" were produced by Jack Antonoff. Don't know off hand if there were others.
― MarkoP, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
i'm liking the music to Clean. very cool.
― prince moth mothy moth moth (cajunsunday), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:31 (ten years ago)
wish "you r in love" and "new romance" were on the record proper.
iirc i experienced the same thing with red
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:31 (ten years ago)
^^
i don't remember the red bonus tracks tho
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:33 (ten years ago)
"the moment i knew" and "girl at home" should be on red in place of the duets imo (which i don't hate but)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:33 (ten years ago)
feels like this sorta ends with a whisper but i'm prob underrating it
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:34 (ten years ago)
whimper* i mean but also whisper
the voice memos are interesting
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:35 (ten years ago)
DO YOU LIKE IT
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:36 (ten years ago)
"this is like an early-2000s nelly track"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:38 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" feels like a bit of a clunker on second listen. like bad exposition.
the title "you r in love" is going to irk me, such an inexplicable halfway house between "u r in love" and "you are in love". PICK A SIDE TAYLOR
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:41 (ten years ago)
the leak i have has a bunch of f'd up song titles
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
her GOAT bonus track to date is "untouchable", usually they're relatively forgettable - i don't really use any of the red ones
"new romance" really really should have been on the album proper
"wonderland" should be nowhere
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
New Romance is on some indie-pop fuckery. Adjacent to a Passion Pit song.
It's also good.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:42 (ten years ago)
yeah "bad blood" sticks out like a sore thumb... but i thought that about "mean" and even "stay stay stay" but eventually grew to accept if not love them
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:43 (ten years ago)
Last album she and her boy imagined themselves -- or she did anyway -- as RFK and Ethel. Now the boy looks like James Dean. She's so determined to hold the boomer audience AND their kids.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:44 (ten years ago)
can see myself liking "bad blood" but it starts off way ugly
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:44 (ten years ago)
lol no one is as stuck on "starlight" as alfred
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:44 (ten years ago)
good song to be stuck on tbh
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:45 (ten years ago)
Last album she and her boy imagined themselves -- or she did anyway -- as RFK and Ethel.
she dated RFK's grandson!
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:46 (ten years ago)
MIDNIGHTYOU COME AND PICK ME UP NO HEADLIGHTS
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:46 (ten years ago)
jeez "style" gives and gives
that little guitar squiggle on "style" and the motherfucking "take me up" bridge
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:47 (ten years ago)
"how you get the girl" isn't really up to much either tbh
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:49 (ten years ago)
style is my new fav song ever
lex, rolling stone in their TS interview and antonoff both confirmed it's "you are in love"
― prolego, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:50 (ten years ago)
i like "how you get the girl" -- it feels very classically taylor swift to me (the opening guitar riff almost seems pavlovian in that sense) but they streamlined it well into the sound of the album
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:51 (ten years ago)
i was surprised at how much it is up to!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:52 (ten years ago)
holy shit new romance tho
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:53 (ten years ago)
How You Get sounds pretty good. A little Love Story in there. I can't process lyrics on my first listen, though, sensory overload, and I'm still on my first listen.
― abcfsk, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:54 (ten years ago)
chorus on How You Get The Girl feels kinda undeniable.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:55 (ten years ago)
"i know places" is very hunger games, this is a compliment
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 17:57 (ten years ago)
I was gonna say "She should write about a contemporary star like Jake Gyllenhaal" until I remembered, She probably has.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 17:59 (ten years ago)
^^^that's what "all too well" is about dood
― slothroprhymes, Friday, 24 October 2014 18:00 (ten years ago)
That was my joke
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 18:04 (ten years ago)
this album feels like taylor taking her thing and turning it into a manifesto
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 18:10 (ten years ago)
wiiiiildest dreaaams *weird breathy notes*
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 18:14 (ten years ago)
i know this is dumb to do on 3 listens but i really am going to the pub now (because my laptop is down to 19% battery) and it'll be amusing to revisit in six months when i disagree with it entirely
PEAK TAYLOR: blank space, style, out of the woods, i wish you would, wildest dreams, new romanceAMAZING: all you had to do was stay, this love, i know places, clean, you are in loveMEH: how you get the girlNAH: bad blood, wonderlandFUCKING NOPE: welcome to new york, shake it off
― lex pretend, Friday, 24 October 2014 18:27 (ten years ago)
i'm on track 11
"how you get the girl" was the only one so far that hasn't made me delirious
i wasn't completely sure about the opening of "bad blood" but then the repeated choruses with the added synths and shit gave me my entire life
it took everything in me not to stop at "style" and just listen on repeat for 10 hrs
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 19:00 (ten years ago)
Out of the woods works reaaaaally well in the context of the album. All you had to do was stay is really good.
― cpl593H, Friday, 24 October 2014 19:10 (ten years ago)
I really like the way the album ramps up til All you had to do was stay; after that "Shake it off" breaks the spell but she manages to come back. On a first listen, the thing I'm most reminded of is Stephen Bray/Patrick Leonard Madonna; soundwise, I wish you would is currently evoking Open Your Heart.
― cpl593H, Friday, 24 October 2014 19:40 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 18:06 (2 hours ago)
really?
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:07 (ten years ago)
i mean third listen i've kind of gotten used to it but yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:09 (ten years ago)
verse/chorus transition is just gross to me, think the chorus is unearned drama
hunger games though i guess
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
before hearing the voice memo i thought it sounded like taylor straight up covering a onerepublic song
real time reax: I love the interplay her vocals and the beat on "Blank Space", I'm in bed still but can see myself struggling not to walk in time and act it out when listening in transit.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
pretty sure "you are in love" is the "enchanted" of this record for me
p sad it's a bonus track but whatever it's 2014 everything is a bonus track
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:13 (ten years ago)
omg me listening to "Style" is total dying cat meme pic
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
you and i (forever) tim
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
I do not know this meme pic you're taking about but I'm sure Swift will appreciate the dying cat.
― raccoon shipoopi (how's life), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
omg @ new romance
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
i just got this and put that on first fyi
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
in wonderlaaaaaaaaaaaaaand
this song is fucking KILLING me
it's a tricky sitch being addicted to like 10 diff tracks simultaneously
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
it's "new romantics" not "new romance" btw
damn, no pretty girls make graves cover after all
― call all destroyer, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:23 (ten years ago)
― raccoon shipoopi (how's life), Friday, October 24, 2014 8:19 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
me irl, listening to this album
http://i.imgur.com/uwUgz.jpg
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:25 (ten years ago)
same
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
"I Wish You Would" -----------> my heart
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:29 (ten years ago)
My cat gif to when this leaked was this:
http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu216/le_bateau_ivre/a3el1Hr.gif
Going whut whut whut whut wanna devour all of this! First new Swift album as a new fan :) Can't get enough. The pace is great so far too. Out of the Woods album version is slower than the single release?
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
I wish you would w/ shimmering guitar licks and damn yo those synth stabs!
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:33 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" what is this.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:33 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:34 (ten years ago)
good question
everything abt new romantics is really perfect except 'the best ppl in life are free' ??
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:34 (ten years ago)
"Wildest Dreams" is like classic taylor, but in a way that expands the definition of what classic taylor is.
"Nothing lasts forever... but this is getting good now."
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:36 (ten years ago)
Bad Blood is doing my brane in tbh. 'Lets throw loads of diff rhythms in there and get that Lorde echo in there'
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:37 (ten years ago)
yeah, i was thinking it recycled taylor imagery in a really expansive way, almost telescoping out on it ("say you'll remember me / standing in a nice dress")
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
she's talking bout single folk right
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:39 (ten years ago)
Wildest Dreams is the shit. Sounds like it could've been on the last Tegan and Sara album to me tbh
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:41 (ten years ago)
i do not know what is remotely meh about "how you get the girl".
The way its pre-chorus and chorus totally demolish katy perry is a much better revenge than "bad blood'.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:41 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:42 (ten years ago)
song is a hook party
wow yea wildest dreams killls
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:46 (ten years ago)
CLEAN.
"You're still all over me like a wine-stained dress I can't wear anymore..."
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 20:51 (ten years ago)
^^ Just because you're clean don't mean you're not gonna miss it ;_;
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 20:57 (ten years ago)
new romantics is pre-emptively shading charli xcx's next album.
also is brilliant.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:06 (ten years ago)
"i wish you would" >>>>>>>>
"wonderland" is bad tho
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 October 2014 21:10 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" is everythingggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg. and she def drew inspiration from serena williams circa us open 2011 final
"so if you're coming my way - just don't..."
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:12 (ten years ago)
lol uh idk abt that
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:18 (ten years ago)
let me believe that
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:21 (ten years ago)
bad blooddrunk by six
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 21:37 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" is kinda the "my song 5" of this album and not in a good way.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:44 (ten years ago)
i like it more every time i hear it but yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 24 October 2014 21:45 (ten years ago)
"This Love" should sound like Maroon 5, in a good way.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 21:46 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" and "wonderland" are 2 of my immediate faves :(
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:46 (ten years ago)
Bad Blood reminds me of Avril Lavigne, and not in a good way.
― MarkoP, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:53 (ten years ago)
if you live like that you live with ghostsif you love like that BLOOD RUNS COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLD
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:56 (ten years ago)
can't honestly understand the hate towards 'bad blood'.
― Nourry, Friday, 24 October 2014 21:58 (ten years ago)
Wildest Dreams is very Lana.
― Greer, Friday, 24 October 2014 22:11 (ten years ago)
^^ otm
― definite classic, predicting a solid 8/10 from the p-fork boys (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 24 October 2014 22:13 (ten years ago)
xxpost no hate, it just feels a bit awkward. Which might improve with further listens.
― Tim F, Friday, 24 October 2014 22:14 (ten years ago)
"This Love" is the only song right now besides the two singles that I'm eh about.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 22:15 (ten years ago)
i do get bad blood as avril-ish but im ok w that basically
― johnny crunch, Friday, 24 October 2014 22:15 (ten years ago)
'cause you know i love the players and YOU! LOVE! THE GAME!
― uberweiss, Friday, 24 October 2014 22:24 (ten years ago)
If we're thinking of 1989 referents, then "How You Get the Girl"'s prechorus reminds me of Roxette's "Dressed For Success. "
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 October 2014 22:37 (ten years ago)
"I Wish You Would" sounds like taylor has been listening to danielle haim's vocal cadences
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, 24 October 2014 22:38 (ten years ago)
and "I Know Places" borrows a melody or two from the last song on the last tegan & sara record
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, 24 October 2014 22:55 (ten years ago)
"Style" and "Clean" are the two best songs she's ever written.
― Driver 8, Friday, 24 October 2014 22:58 (ten years ago)
omg i love the ascending vocal tics she does on this album! on "wonderland" particularly and also on "welcome to ny" (the only redeeming feature on welcome to ny for me tbh). and it's on another song too but i forget which
album seems INCREDIBLE on first listen which is surprising considering i only genuinely liked one of the pre-release songs
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, 24 October 2014 23:10 (ten years ago)
I swear it's more than the "eh-eh-eh" part but "Wonderland" sounds like a rejected Rihanna song.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Friday, 24 October 2014 23:22 (ten years ago)
PEAK TAYLOR: Style, Clean, Wildest Dreams, Bad Blood
AMAZING: Blank Space, You Are In Love, New Romantics
VERY GOOD: Out of the Woods, I Wish You Would, Wonderland, I Know Places
MEH: How You Get The Girl, This Love, All You Had To Do Was Stay
WHAT WAS SHE THINKING?: Shake It off
― Driver 8, Saturday, 25 October 2014 00:02 (ten years ago)
"Bad Blood" is peak Taylor in idea but definitely not execution.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Saturday, 25 October 2014 00:23 (ten years ago)
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, October 24, 2014 6:38 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yea this is otm
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 01:54 (ten years ago)
top tier songs on this are fyi -- style, wildest dreams, new romatics, shake it off
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 02:07 (ten years ago)
Katy Perry deserves a better diss track.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Saturday, 25 October 2014 02:29 (ten years ago)
Perhaps Katy Perry deserves a better diss track, but, as with all of Taylor's songs, I don't particularly care who it's "really about."
I will say that if "Bad Blood" (or "Style") had been the lead single, Taylor wouldn't have spent seven weeks stalled at #2 behind Meghan Trainor.
― Driver 8, Saturday, 25 October 2014 02:46 (ten years ago)
"Style" probably will/should be the big single from this, but "Blank Space" is the great alternate-universe first single IMO, doing everything that "Shake It Off" is intended to do a million times better.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 October 2014 02:57 (ten years ago)
I wonder whether, in the iTunes age, holding back "Style" until after the album drops will hurt its chart performance. I thought "22" was going to be a way bigger hit than it was: I suspect that if it had been released first instead of "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" it would have been an even bigger #1 than "We Are Never Ever." But once the album is released, the fans buy the individual tracks in week one and then don't buy them when the song gets played on the radio six months later, which hurts the chart performance.
"Shake It Off" was the safe option to introduce New Taylor to the public, I suppose, but, man, I wish her record company had had the balls to lead with "Style."
― Driver 8, Saturday, 25 October 2014 03:00 (ten years ago)
22 isn't as catchy as We Are Never Getting Back Together. It's the weakest of the 3 Max Martin songs on Red.
― Greer, Saturday, 25 October 2014 03:12 (ten years ago)
after first listen, i really like: blank space, all you had to do was stay, i wish you would, how you get the girl, clean
but most of the songs are pretty good :) looking forward to spending more time w/ throughout winter
― dyl, Saturday, 25 October 2014 03:40 (ten years ago)
22 is easily my fav max martin track from red!
"22" destroys "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" and "I Knew You Were Trouble."
― Driver 8, Saturday, 25 October 2014 03:44 (ten years ago)
I'll have to spend more time with this, but my initial favorite is All You Had to Do Was Stay which I don't think has been talked about much today? (Haven't read all of today's posts, so.)
I do like Style a lot too.
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 25 October 2014 06:17 (ten years ago)
Agreed on the Danielle Haim-isms of I Wish You Would.
"Style" sounds (something) like a country song to me! I don't mean how it starts like a Sade song; I mean how she sings. She's still dropping final consonants like she did on "Our Song", and her cadence on the chorus sounds like Luke Bryan's "That's My Kind Of Night". So: country music 2014, but country, sure.
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 25 October 2014 16:17 (ten years ago)
Sheffield's review.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 25 October 2014 18:53 (ten years ago)
Red, from 2012, was her Purple Rain, a sprawling I-am-the-cosmos epic with disco banjos and piano ballads and dubstep drops. But as every Eighties pop star knew, you don't follow one epic with another – instead, you surprise everybody with a quick-change experiment. So rather than trying to duplicate the wide reach of Red, she focuses on one aspect of her sound for a whole album – a very Prince thing to do.
except prince didn't do that after purple rain?
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:08 (ten years ago)
decent review overall but surprised to see that bit written by someone who was actually there
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:09 (ten years ago)
i think around the world in a day focuses on a particular aspect of prince's sound for most of the record
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:10 (ten years ago)
i don't see how it's any less diverse than purple rain (both are 9 songs and just under 45 minutes too, so i don't see how one's any more "epic" than the other other than in quality)
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:11 (ten years ago)
maybe he was thinking of sign o' the times and lovesexy?
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:13 (ten years ago)
also did any other 80s pop star other than prince and bruce ever follow an epic with a "quick-change experiment"? the whole paragraph just feels surprisingly "or so i'm told"
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:20 (ten years ago)
ATWIAD is like he wanted to play with the possibilities of "Take Me With U."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:21 (ten years ago)
I don't hear Like a Prayer as such a massive quick change from True Blue. I might be persuaded for Tunnel of Love.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:22 (ten years ago)
sign/lovesexy would be a more functional comparison yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:23 (ten years ago)
the quick change from:
Suddenly to Love ZonePrivate Dancer to Break Every RuleShe's So Unusual to True ColorsSlippery When Wet to New Jersey
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:26 (ten years ago)
tbf it's possible we've just thought about those sentences longer than he did
― da croupier, Saturday, 25 October 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
this is a p epic breakup album
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 20:28 (ten years ago)
obv im a pussy but if u have *any* unresolved feelings abt an ex ~proceed w caution~
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
There's a real statement of intent feel about having "Blank Space" and "Style" back to back right up front (I tend to ignore "Welcome to New York" anyway).
"Blank Space" feels like the most important song on the album, for how it manages to abandon earnestness while setting up something quite nuanced and charming in its place (all of the previous Max Martin productions to date have been inching in this direction but "Blank Space" goes furthest and is the most successful).
"Style" subtly picks up on this: it's possibly her most emotionally ambiguous relationship song to date, the way the vocal runs in the chorus really capture the sense of her being pulled back into an affair without the song passing judgment on whether this is a good or bad thing.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 October 2014 22:23 (ten years ago)
"Style" is like "Dancing Queen," "There Is a Light That Never Goes Out," or "Heroes." It doesn't really sound like any of those songs, but it's like those songs in that it's about as epic and melodramatic and amazing as pop music gets. I've been one of Taylor's biggest champions for a long time, but I never thought she had something this epic in her.
― Driver 8, Saturday, 25 October 2014 22:29 (ten years ago)
yeh
it's interesting because the pre-release media narrative she's been pushing for this album has been young woman moving to nyc and living the single life, enjoying friends & cats & life (and whilst that's no doubt what she's been up to it's obviously doubled up as an effort to soften her serial dater public image), but that feels somewhat a red herring now? same with "shake it off" and "welcome to new york" (which is even worse in the context of the album where its wide-eyed naivety jars badly with the supreme self-assurance and confidence displayed everywhere else). really this album is much more prior relationship(s) focused than i expected. but i like how it expands on the emotional ambivalence that characterised the the best bits of red ("holy ground" in particular), taking a more mature approach to heartbreak that doesn't cast blame so much as fondly appreciate the beautiful moments and memories amongst all the turbulence. tim f otm re: style.
― prolego, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:12 (ten years ago)
i can't deny most of this album functioning as a bittersweet love letter to harry styles makes love it even more
― prolego, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:18 (ten years ago)
― lex pretend, Friday, October 24, 2014 1:08 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is hilarious btw
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:24 (ten years ago)
I wish every song had a voice memo.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:28 (ten years ago)
this is like an early 2000's Nelly track on the Blank Space voice memo, RIP me
― Sharkie, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:31 (ten years ago)
i've struggled to get past having "blank space" and "style" on repeat all day but the thing that struck me most on the first few listens of the full album is how sensuous it is. "fearless"/"sparks fly"/"treacherous" crush-y swoon-y totally overawed by lust and love t-swift has probably always been the t-swift i most identify with, so i adore that she extends that across so much of 1989. except it's less overawed and more completely in control in the face of it now.
― prolego, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:34 (ten years ago)
i said no one has to know what we do / his hands are in my hair / his clothes are in my room~~
― prolego, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:36 (ten years ago)
bad bloods chorus is like 20% too big band and it feels like 5 diff songs but put 'its so sad toooo/think abt the good times/you and iiiii' section on loop
theres some good parts of welcome 2 ny also but similarly the chorus doesnt quite work imo
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:39 (ten years ago)
― prolego, Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:34 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This is a great point - the sensuousness of a lot of taylor's work is really underrated (add "Enchanted" to this list even if it's ~cleaner~ than "Sparks Fly" or "Treacherous" or "Style") is something that's been overlooked in the various general iterations of her persona (disney princess / serial jilted ex etc.) but it really comes to the fore here.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:52 (ten years ago)
'welcome to ny' is a dreadfully cynical single choice but doesnt seem an issue to me on the album? it's an intro, a scene setter, the sort of storybook fantasy she always toys with
as a void in itself it works v well as prelude to 'blank space', the backhanded acknowledgment of but crucially also the delight found in "new money, suit & tie i can read you like a magazine"
― r|t|c, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:56 (ten years ago)
(insomnia means ima be one of u guys tonight btw hi)
― r|t|c, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:58 (ten years ago)
even beyond how rudimentary "welcome to new york" sounds, it's just so pointless as a thematic stage-setter - there's more references to nyc on red than on 1989 ("holy ground", "come back be here", the fucking scarf on "all too well" is situated there)!
"blank space" works so much better as an opening: it's like a nightmarish twist on "tim mcgraw" & "our song", that so perfectly framed her debut. rebooting her sound but still knowingly able to destroy men with the click of her pen. plus every fucking line is hook it's insane
― prolego, Saturday, 25 October 2014 23:59 (ten years ago)
well i had intended to listen to the whole album but it seems i've just spent 40 minutes looping 'out of the woods' instead. dangerous tune
― r|t|c, Sunday, 26 October 2014 00:43 (ten years ago)
oh man johnny wz right, track 5 is murdering me
― r|t|c, Sunday, 26 October 2014 00:50 (ten years ago)
when you're youngyou just runbut you come backto what you need
― uberweiss, Sunday, 26 October 2014 01:54 (ten years ago)
― Sharkie, Saturday, October 25, 2014 7:31 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 26 October 2014 02:23 (ten years ago)
I can't tell if the very high "Stay!" is sped up or if it's just a quick falsetto note run through a ton of effects, but I think that one little tiny bit is my favorite creative decision on the entire album.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 26 October 2014 02:28 (ten years ago)
Leaving "New Romantics" off of the album proper was a huge error in judgment.
― Driver 8, Sunday, 26 October 2014 05:43 (ten years ago)
Wildest Dreams, sound very Lana Del Rey.
― Popture, Sunday, 26 October 2014 07:14 (ten years ago)
"wildest dreams" is straight up lana cosplay, it's really hard for me to hear
the other gestures towards populist-leaning urban outfitters bands of 2010-present feel earned and valuable, like will hunting strolling up to a blackboard and casually sketching out the solution to a math problem that's been stumping the entire student body all year
"wildest dreams" just feels like a kidz bop cover of summertime sadness though, it sounds like when weird al would write a joke song in the style of a popular band rather than just parodying one of their actual songs straightforwardly
maybe i'll warm up to it in the long run but right now it's bothering me in a way that the mazzy star and paramore homages on past records never did
― james brooks, Sunday, 26 October 2014 08:03 (ten years ago)
Let's talk about the ways in which "Style" is actually really clever and stuff.
Like, this feels like one of Taylor's most worked-out relationship metaphors:
- "never go out of style": a relationship that's easy to fall back into b/c so comforting and familiar;
- but at the same time the idea that the relationship works because we like our version of ourselves with each other not necessarily b/c we're happy - we "fit well" together but that's it;
- and the lurking sense that maybe this is all ultimately empty, that what we like in each other and in ourselves together is maybe kind of meaningless (the elevation of clothing choice to the level of fundamental human property seems v deliberate);
- and yet notwithstanding that (loop back to point 1).
Also the vulnerability in Taylor's voice on "I heard..." and "some other girl..." and then her kind of rueful "I've been there too a few times..."
― Tim F, Sunday, 26 October 2014 10:46 (ten years ago)
yeah "Style" is really incredible
― droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, 26 October 2014 11:12 (ten years ago)
it might be the platonic ideal t-swift song, or at least the coalescence of all her peak qualities to date: the craftsmanship of "treacherous" x the pop instinct of "you belong with me" x the overwhelming feelings of "enchanted", with her most affecting vocal performance to date to cap it off.
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 11:40 (ten years ago)
"Style" makes me wonder what would come of a collaboration with Diddy
― droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, 26 October 2014 11:44 (ten years ago)
really like tim's points on "style".
to put it in a wider context: not to turn the conversation immediately to "wildest dreams" but it sounds somewhat of a piece with "style" here. and i think the really key thing on "wildest dreams" is it signalling taylor's perspective shift when it comes to relationships: her recognition and acceptance and even embrace of their potential finitude, that they could last a year or a month or only a night but that doesn't change their importance in that moment. "nothing lasts for ever but this is getting good now" might be the crucial line of 1989. less idealistic than she used to be perhaps but still as generous as ever.
that seems to dovetail with those opening lines of "style": "long drive could end in burning flames or paradise...". to my ears it doesn't sound like she cares, in that moment she's in all in it either way, and she'll circle round and round and touch the fire again and again because of how alluring the heat is. and it's no mistake it immediately follows "blank space": "so it's gonna be forever/or it's gonna go down in flames/you can tell me when it's over/if the high was worth the pain". lex mentioned upthread how this album feels like a manifesto and those lines could well be its guiding principle. just a full on commitment to whatever consequences.
and it's an obvious point but the way driving is reinforced as a central swiftian motif on "style" and "wildest dreams" - the risk that is carries, the intimacy it entails and the loss of control it signifies - is so great (and only solidifies "treacherous"'s place in her canon!) i think maybe why all those three songs are amongst her very best because they operate at a ground zero point - right at the nexus where emotion and logic constantly battle and override each other in real time (rather than at a usual safer distance) which she details so well. it's taylor at her most insightful but also her most overwhelming.
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 12:40 (ten years ago)
I like "Shake It Off" about 10000x more than "Welcome to New York" :( I mean, I like the line about "boys and boys, and girls and girls" but otherwise, eeucch.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 26 October 2014 16:14 (ten years ago)
i did not deliberately hear ldr on "wildest dreams" until a lot of ppl mentioned it, which is maybe mostly revealing of my disinterest toward ldr
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Sunday, 26 October 2014 16:38 (ten years ago)
― droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, October 26, 2014 7:44 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
lol but also really
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 26 October 2014 16:46 (ten years ago)
i think the kinda breathy sighing backing vocals on the bridge of "style" are easily one of the best vocal moments of her career
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 26 October 2014 16:47 (ten years ago)
i keep on hearing "lonely Starbucks lovers" in the 'Blank Space' chorus, ugh
― Sharkie, Sunday, 26 October 2014 18:37 (ten years ago)
I hear it as "gotta love those starbucks lovers" (alternatively "God love those starbucks lovers") - and if it's something else I don't want to know, it's a great line like that.
― Tim F, Sunday, 26 October 2014 19:55 (ten years ago)
the basic bitches of relationships
― prolego, Sunday, October 26, 2014 12:40 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yes I was thinking this yesterday! Also the car crash / relationship crash metaphor in "Out of the Woods" - "remember when you hit the breaks too soon?"
― Tim F, Sunday, 26 October 2014 19:58 (ten years ago)
These days, Swift's life sounds like this album: frantic, reflective, shouted and whispered. That's now, at 24. As for what 34 will be like, all bets are off. I asked her if all this is permanent, if 10 years from now we should be shocked if she makes, say, a rooted, singer-songwriter album that sounds something like the Emmylou Harris works that she adores.
"I would not be shocked at all," she says. "It would shock me if I didn't. With '1989' I went in a different direction and went with a sonically cohesive pop album. Who knows where it will go next, but it won't be the same."
― abcfsk, Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:08 (ten years ago)
Also:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10349199_10152525469894862_2433914807347289832_n.jpg?oh=1c66aaed376b5b449df40235672332af&oe=54E535A8&__gda__=1424557502_d900ea9cad8e0881f4777f91119c6a17
― Tim F, Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
I hear her next album will be all zydeco.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:18 (ten years ago)
She will probably stay somewhere on the pop-country spectrum. Just guessing.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
also can't forget the driving narrative of "i wish you would", though there it exists to represent the shifting distance and direction of an ex-flame. she probably also liked the "forever" video.
fav swiftian in that song - bringing back 2am but this time to signify a simultaneous split narrative! what he's thinking, what she's thinking and then both together.
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:35 (ten years ago)
youalwaysknewhow to push my buttons!
yougavemeeverything and nothing!
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:40 (ten years ago)
"wildest dreams" as the other side of "style" as they are both about images that are frozen in time
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
and the images resemble each other, just one of them is without the dude
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:51 (ten years ago)
Throughout the entire album, she's singing better than ever.
"This Love" is one of her most forgettable lyrical efforts ever: "This love is good / this love is bad," etc. C'mon Taylor, you can do better than that! However, her singing, especially the wordless "whoah-oh-ohs," carries "This Love," and makes it a good track.
― Driver 8, Sunday, 26 October 2014 20:58 (ten years ago)
love the unsettling "i i i i / i i i I" refrain on "i know places" as well. some of the vocal phrasings she uses for effect she absolutely couldn't have done a few years ago. it really goes hand in hand with the expansion of her sonic palette, which i think pays off the most on those final three ballads where her writing veers more impressionistic. they all sound incredible - so lush and atmospheric and detailed.
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 21:40 (ten years ago)
like a prayer might be the madge reference point she's been mentioning in interviews but those ballads remind me a lot of the ones on the back half of ray of light.
― prolego, Sunday, 26 October 2014 21:43 (ten years ago)
I'm surprised "Clean" isn't getting more attention in this discussion. Even more so than "Style," on first listen it was a "holy fuck" moment where she went so far beyond what I could have hoped she could do, and I have always had pretty high hopes for what she could do. "When the butterflies turned to dust that covered my whole room / So I punched a hole through the roof …"
― Driver 8, Sunday, 26 October 2014 22:02 (ten years ago)
'Clean' took me a 2-3 listens before it fully registered, I mean the production is pretty light so it doesn't stand out compared to the rest, but yeah it's *huge* - also a very good closer on the album
― Sharkie, Sunday, 26 October 2014 23:36 (ten years ago)
I actually really like ending the album with "New Romantics", there's a thematic power to ending this particular album with a declaration of independence, especially if like me you tend to start the album with "Blank Space" (in sort of the same way that "Begin Again" was both a continuation and refutation of "State of Grace").
Imagine how tight this album would seem if this was the tracklist:
1. Blank Space2. Style3. Out of the Woods4. All You Had To Do Was Stay5. You Are In Love6. I Wish You Would7. Wildest Dreams8. How You Get The Girl9. This Love10. Clean11. New Romantics
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 01:05 (ten years ago)
this is how i've been playing it:
1. New Romantics2. Blank Space3. Style4. Out of the Woods5. All You Had To Do Was Stay6. I Wish You Would7. Wildest Dreams8. How You Get The Girl9. This Love10. I Know Places11. You Are In Love12. Clean
which is everything.
"new romantics" definitely feels v important and works best as an opener/closer; it's "welcome to ny" done right the same way "blank space" is "shake it off" done right.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 01:18 (ten years ago)
these are the secret messages in the 1989 booklet:
Welcome to New York: We begin our story in New YorkBlank Space: There once was a girl known by every one and no oneStyle: Her heart belonged to someone who couldn’t stayOut of the Woods: They loved each other recklesslyAll You Had To Do was Stay: They paid the priceShake It Off: She danced to forget himI Wish You Would: He drove past her street each nightBad Blood: She made friends and enemiesWildest Dreams: He only saw her in his dreamsHow To Get The Girl: Then one day he came backThis Love: Timing is a funny thingI Know Places: And everyone was watchingClean: She lost him but she found herself and somehow that was everything
LOL @ her awkwardly attempting to fit "welcome to ny"/"shake it off"/"bad blood" into a narrative where they're redundant.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 01:22 (ten years ago)
wow tim our condensed tracklistings are the same
i leave in "welcome to new york" but yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 02:16 (ten years ago)
i like how tim's tracklist retains the tswift tradition of track 5 being the place for the centrepiece ballad
"you are in love" fucking kills me everytime
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 02:42 (ten years ago)
I like "New Romantics", but I think I would like it more if the chorus didn't keep reminding me of Bowling For Soup's 1985.
― MarkoP, Monday, 27 October 2014 02:45 (ten years ago)
"You two are dancing in a snowglobe, round and roundAnd he keeps a picture of you in his office downtownAnd you understood now why they lost their minds and fought the warsAnd why I've spent my whole life trying to put it into wordsCause you can hear it in the silenceYou can feel it on the way homeYou can see it with the lights outYou are in love, true love"
*sobs uncontrollably*
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 02:45 (ten years ago)
yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 02:46 (ten years ago)
putting "you are in love" early in the tracklisting also subverts some of the overcaffeinated vibes of the first half
i mean "you can hear it in the silence" is a cliche but a very precise one, totally nails the ambient quality of the feeling
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 02:48 (ten years ago)
The sudden jolt into first person in that song is v endearing
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Monday, 27 October 2014 03:14 (ten years ago)
hello "you are in love" is the best song on this okay goodbye
― j. winters (josh), Monday, 27 October 2014 05:52 (ten years ago)
"One night he wakes, strange look on his face / Pauses, then says, you're my best friend"
;_; for ever and ever and ever
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 07:39 (ten years ago)
everyone about the chorus in "you are in love" kills me over and over again
― j. winters (josh), Monday, 27 October 2014 07:46 (ten years ago)
everything* lol
Album only really takes off from Out of the Woods IMO, first three tracks are hamstrung by the stiltedness and rhythmic stiffness of the arrangements, it's the difference between dancing awkwardly on the fringes of a party and throwing yourself into it. Oddly cheap sounding for such a major release as well.
It really does take off with Out of the Woods onward though.
― Matt DC, Monday, 27 October 2014 08:53 (ten years ago)
Lol u mad
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 09:04 (ten years ago)
Actually Blank Space is really working for me on the second go round (and free from the baggage of following Welcome To New York, which is just a monumentally buzz harshing opener.) I'm still not feeling Style though.
― Matt DC, Monday, 27 October 2014 09:23 (ten years ago)
You are half as mad as before
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 09:30 (ten years ago)
ITunes pre-order now available. Enjoying this very much much. Just got to Bad Blood though. I kinda like it. Love the little Warren Zevon "hey" in the chorus. It gets better when it goes back into the chorus after the bridge.
― raccoon shipoopi (how's life), Monday, 27 October 2014 10:13 (ten years ago)
people who liked Red, do you like this as much, better, the same?
― piscesx, Monday, 27 October 2014 10:18 (ten years ago)
I have nothing intelligent to say about this album, but I'm very much enjoying reading everyone else on it. I was listening to it on a loop on the train from Michigan to Chicago yesterday, and This Love/I Know Places/Clean was the soundtrack to staring out the window at the last of the autumn sun through the fall leaves, and it was almost too much.
The lyrics of "This Love" might not be her best ever, but the sound of it more than makes up for it for me.
I'm embarrassed to say that "Style" hasn't quite clicked for me yet, either - it's good, but it's not in the top half dozen songs here for me (yet).
― toby, Monday, 27 October 2014 10:24 (ten years ago)
best misdirection on this album is "i love the players and you. love. the game" because the entire album is all about how taylor swift, supreme player, is addicted to playing the game. she started this on red but it's dizzying how she completely elides rapture and pain now - and at times it feels like a shield, this shrugging off the potential of heartbreak because that's not what matters so how can you ever hurt her
agree that her vocals are revelatory in places. that second verse of "style", oh my god
so it goeshe can't keep his wide eyes on the roadtakes me homethe lights are off, he's taking off his coat - mmmmmmm, yeah!said i heard - oh! - that you've been out and about with some other girl(some other girl----)he says, "what you heard is true, but ican't stop thinking 'bout you," and i,i said "i've been there too, a few times..."
the way she moves from pure lust on that mmm yeah to the momentary anguish of "some other girl" to exactly, perfectly mimicking the BS line he fobs her off with and conveys both why it's BS and why she falls for its charm and then it doesn't matter because she, supreme player, does exactly the same thing. i'm looping that song and within it i am looping that verse over and over
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 10:30 (ten years ago)
"i know places" is so dramatic and huge i love it. AND GUNS!!!!
"wildest dreams" is LDR imitation on the one hand but on the other i love how taylor casts herself as something not quite real, a representation of romance...something about it that reminds me of greek myths
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 10:34 (ten years ago)
somewhat disappointed to realise she's singing "gotta long list of ex-lovers" not "gotta love those starbucks lovers".
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 11:53 (ten years ago)
really?! "got a long list of ex-lovers" - sung half-boastfully, to boot! - is such a brilliant thing for any female pop star in 2014 to be singing
i heard "all the pricks they threw at me" the first 5 times on "new romantics"
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:00 (ten years ago)
Songs I love:
Blank SpaceStyleAll You Had To Do is I Wish You Would
Songs I like:
CleanHow You Get the GirlNew RomanticsI Know Places
Bleh:
Shake It OffBad BloodWildest Dreams
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:00 (ten years ago)
It seems so obvious now but was hearing Starbucks lovers all weekend
― groovypanda, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:01 (ten years ago)
add "Welcome to NY" to the bleh pile
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:01 (ten years ago)
*"New Romance." Guess I'm showing my biases.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:02 (ten years ago)
I'm liking this one better than Red. Possibly because it's a much more drastic departure from her previous efforts (I could have seen a song like "Never Grow Up" somehow fitting in Red, but not here), and it's so successful at it.
Anyway, it's hard to pick one Swift album over the others; all of them seemed the best Swift album possible for that particular moment when they came out (S/T and mid teens, Fearless and graduating from high school, Speak Now and the transition between late teens and early twenties, Red and the discovery of partying, romance and heartbreak, and 1989 now portraying the bittersweet ambiguity of romance, sex and lust in the mid twenties, when people leave college, get a job and finally start living a life of their own)
― cpl593H, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:05 (ten years ago)
I think it is actually called new romantics. the leak just had botched track titles
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:05 (ten years ago)
casual reminder to all enjoying this album that shellback also did some very good work on the cher lloyd album this year
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:07 (ten years ago)
I'm glad you all waited until the album was actually released
― 龜, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:07 (ten years ago)
Oh my god / Look at that face / You look like / My next mistake
!!!! <3
i feel like "i know places" is getting way underrated itt
most suitable song on the album for a queer reading
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:08 (ten years ago)
It's just not very good.
More Divergent sequel than Hunger Games IMO.
I know but i had a whole theory going about what "starbucks lovers" meant. The real words seem so.. explicable by comparison.
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:11 (ten years ago)
I think Bad Blood's now the only true stinker for me. Even the singles become more tolerable in the context of the album. As singles, they've a lot of weight to carry on their own; in the album they're mere setup for the really good stuff (Blank space, I wish you would)
― cpl593H, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:12 (ten years ago)
nahhh taylor lands on every rhyme so satisfyingly on "i know places"
"starbucks lovers" would be too on the nose imo, just like naming the indie band on WANEGBT would've been. it's one of her great strengths as a songwriter that she deals in specifics but not real-world 2014 specifics: no namechecking, no brand naming.
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:18 (ten years ago)
somewhat disappointed to realise she's singing "gotta long list of ex-lovers" not "gotta love those starbucks lovers".― Tim F, Monday, October 27, 2014 7:53 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Tim F, Monday, October 27, 2014 7:53 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark
Not gonna go back through the thread until after the first listen but 'starbucks lovers' pretty clearly means names on a Starbucks cup right?
― 龜, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:18 (ten years ago)
yeah she's talking about writing names on the blank spaces of coffee cups barista style
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:21 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePqEDLPUt90#t=258
― raccoon shipoopi (how's life), Monday, 27 October 2014 12:23 (ten years ago)
xp
― 龜, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:23 (ten years ago)
I'm hardly down on every Tedder joint ever but "I Know Places" feels like it suffers a bit from the archetypal Tedder flaw of not earning its own drama.
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:27 (ten years ago)
Whoawhoawhoa why does Wildest Dreams start out like a Cure song
― 龜, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:32 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/wo6uy20.jpg
― 龜, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:39 (ten years ago)
I've been surprised to see reviews that say "How You Get The Girl" is naive or etc.
I had assumed it was kind of like a lighthearted or knowing version of "The Last Time" - Taylor admitting that she will always fall for protestations of undying devotion even though she knows that they're probably not true.
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 12:50 (ten years ago)
yeh it def feels a callback to that duet
it really shouldn't still destroy me when she does her POV shifts but it gets me here where on the face of it she's giving knowing advice to a friend in this situation and it ends up about actually being secretly what she wants an ex-lover to tell her.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:02 (ten years ago)
"how you get the girl" feels a bit perfunctory to me, like it's taylor rattling off a romcom plot knowingly and half calling the cliché out and half living it anyway
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:06 (ten years ago)
i would probably say it's the least naive song on the album, it's about as cynical as taylor gets
she's telling him how to PLAY. THE. GAME. and she'll give into it all the same
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:06 (ten years ago)
plus it's objectively the catchiest song ever
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:07 (ten years ago)
yeah i still don't like "i know places" but i've warmed to it slightly since i started thinking of it as a b-side to the cher lloyd record
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 13:35 (ten years ago)
think it's as dissonant to the flow of the record as "bad blood" or "shake it off" though
In the context of the rest of the album Shake It Off is the sound of you lying to yourself in a mirror
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 27 October 2014 13:40 (ten years ago)
her delivery on "i know places" is incredible imo - there's a real sense of darting motion. the metaphor of the chase works really well and she never lets up
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:43 (ten years ago)
yeah but the minor-to-major transition between verse and chorus is imo about as cynical as taylor gets
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 13:46 (ten years ago)
I'm sticking with "Starbucks lovers."
― cr4bdbgs, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:46 (ten years ago)
all the rhythmic switch-ups used so that the song twists and and turns and never stops feeling fraught and on edge throughout >>>>
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:50 (ten years ago)
Someone should set this thread to music.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:51 (ten years ago)
― cpl593H, Monday, 27 October 2014 13:54 (ten years ago)
"Shake It Off" is closer to the sound of lines done on a mirror.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 14:09 (ten years ago)
yeah re 'how you get the girl' again like 'welcome to ny' it's maybe another where like while I appreciate a Tay stan may find it kinda inanely obvi and unnecessary (esp wrt previous subtle contexts), to want to have it not there in its purest driven form is perhaps to ask for the album to be more overtly knowing in a way that also seems iffy imo idk
― r|t|c, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:10 (ten years ago)
I don't think it's particularly pure but i love it
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:12 (ten years ago)
(emphasis on the overtness rather than the knowing there)
― r|t|c, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:13 (ten years ago)
oh yeah agreed then
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:16 (ten years ago)
"bad blood" is a max martin/shellback track which is funny considering how often they work with her
― snrub goin up on a tuesday (J0rdan S.), Monday, 27 October 2014 14:33 (ten years ago)
https://twitter.com/nycgo/status/526714641175834624
― maura, Monday, 27 October 2014 14:49 (ten years ago)
brand synergy
― Greer, Monday, 27 October 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
http://headlineplanet.com/home/2014/10/27/taylor-swifts-1989-hits-1-blank-space-style-surge-sales-chart/
― groovypanda, Monday, 27 October 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/Tg1uV9i.jpg
i mean there's no way she can have worse knees than amar'e stoudemire amirite
― blood on the peaves (slothroprhymes), Monday, 27 October 2014 16:01 (ten years ago)
i have to say that i'm having a harder time separating the t-sweezy autobiographical backgrounds from some of the songs this time. for example, "all too well" is so goddamn good that who cares it's about jake gyllenhaal. but "bad blood" is not good enough for me to not say, "seriously? a katy perry beef? over john fucking mayer?"
ostensibly the dude who smashes his face in a skiing accident or whatever in "out of the woods" is harry styles right? i find it hard not to laugh at the "you started crying" bit, though that song is at least really good
― blood on the peaves (slothroprhymes), Monday, 27 October 2014 16:12 (ten years ago)
i'm going to assume "bad blood" apes katy perry's hamfistedness as some sort of clever meta-shade (in the same way "dear john" lifts some of mayer's stylings). but if that's her way of getting back at enemies i'd much rather she didn't have beef with the single worst pop star of this decade.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
the verses are cute tho
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:21 (ten years ago)
Playing biographical hootchy-coo might compensate for the vagueness of many of the songs. For me this is the first Swift album that gets over on sonics. I look forward to hearing a lot of these on the radio.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 16:38 (ten years ago)
the biographical nature of her work has always been overstated. i mean the songs on her first album were written at 14/15 when she hadn't been with anyone - she doesn't need guys to come up with good songs.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:43 (ten years ago)
it's been overstated mostly by HER though. incredibly annoying to see critics bandy it around instead of just ignoring her trying to spell things out for us
― lex pretend, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:45 (ten years ago)
let me remind you
thiswaswhatyouwanted
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 27 October 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
There is some level of compensation here. It's like lyrics this time leave room for the music/delivery/production to complete the picture, as opposed to her previous efforts, where her writing was more self-contained. Still, I like it; it's an approach that's very different from what she had been doing up to now and it's still successful, in the sense that she manages to convey emotion nevertheless.
I also like how even though the number of collaborators has increased from Red, I find this one more cohesive and belonging to a unified vision. Back when Red came out I used to feel there was a noticeable breach between Max Martin and non-Max Martin's tracks.
― cpl593H, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:57 (ten years ago)
I don't care about biographical Taylor as much as diaristic Taylor, which I love and is not as abundant here as in previous records.
― cpl593H, Monday, 27 October 2014 16:59 (ten years ago)
i deleted the 5 songs i don't really like from the tracklist and now the album's better but too short :\
― dyl, Monday, 27 October 2014 17:07 (ten years ago)
Bad Blood is about KP but not Mayer.
Outside of that I don't really know anything about who the other tracks are about or what situations she refers to. I've read quite a lot about TS the past few years yet I know less specifics than before and I'm happy with that.
― abcfsk, Monday, 27 October 2014 17:17 (ten years ago)
There is some level of compensation here. It's like lyrics this time leave room for the music/delivery/production to complete the picture, as opposed to her previous efforts, where her writing was more self-contained.
This is what I like most about the album -- by the time the scarf showed up in "All Too Well" I was ready to fill in a couple more blanks. At some point TS started putting in too many Perfect Details and I stopped caring about them. And I like the shorter length of cutting this down to 11 tracks.
― cr4bdbgs, Monday, 27 October 2014 17:41 (ten years ago)
http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/taylor-swift-1989/
decent molly lambert write-up if, per usual, the writer is reaching a bit too hard with some of the "tay's tryna be the crazy girlfriend" stuff. that said, this stuck out as, in part, an odd statement
"The negative traits ascribed to Taylor always sound like a greatest-hits list of every bad characteristic associated with womanhood: too emotional, too weak, too naive, too uptight, too slutty."
...has anyone ever called taylor "slutty?"
― blood on the peaves (slothroprhymes), Monday, 27 October 2014 18:54 (ten years ago)
if anything a leaner tracklist is welcome after some of the bloat of speak now and red, the former with that "better than revenge"/"innocent"/"haunted" section that sucks out the album's momentum and ended up diminishing how powerful "last kiss" and "long live" really are as a finale, and the latter with those unnecessary duets. all her albums have had filler though (even fearless!), albeit less filler than her contemporaries have.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 18:56 (ten years ago)
What was filler on Fearless tho
― abcfsk, Monday, 27 October 2014 18:57 (ten years ago)
"change". or at least i can't listen to it now "long live" exists in this universe.
― prolego, Monday, 27 October 2014 18:59 (ten years ago)
influenced by the Jan Hammer–influenced electronic subgenre outrun, made popular by the Drive soundtrack. Swift is trying out new musical identities
:|
― Number None, Monday, 27 October 2014 19:19 (ten years ago)
If I was gonna ascribe a Drive influence it would be a change in Taylor's favourite FYRG romantic setting from The Notebook poster to the Drive poster.
Not the soundtrack.
― Tim F, Monday, 27 October 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
the voice memo part of the album is quite good for doing repetitive computer work to
― Sharkie, Monday, 27 October 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
refn is swift for boys
― r|t|c, Monday, 27 October 2014 21:02 (ten years ago)
Lindsay's review: http://www.vulture.com/2014/10/album-review-taylor-swift-1989.html
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 October 2014 22:13 (ten years ago)
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, October 25, 2014 7:28 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
currently living for the part where it repeats over and over again while fading: STAY!STAY!STAY!stay!stay!. it only happens once so u have to listen to the song a lot to hear it as many times as u need to.
i got this at target and my little accompanying packet of "PHOTOS FROM TAYLOR" are numbered sequentially, but beginning with #27. do other people have different PHOTOS FROM TAYLOR? are there booster packs? most of them are of her on what appears to be a totally deserted ferry. welcome to new york.
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:13 (ten years ago)
i thought you were a Wal-Mart guy.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:19 (ten years ago)
target has the whisper-quiet molded red plastic carts and if i'm gonna be in a corporate dystopia i definitely want whisper-quiet molded plastic carts
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:20 (ten years ago)
also in the package: a code for a meet-taylor "swiftstakes". i'm skeptical because when i removed the advertised secret sticker from the commemorative taylor swift cup i bought at subway the other day the secret meet-taylor password for entry into the online meet-taylor swiftstakes turned out to be "MEETTAYLOR". this one appears to be something close to a UPC code tho so maybe i've been bumped up a class.
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:24 (ten years ago)
Think there are four different versions at Target
― 龜, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:29 (ten years ago)
don't agree with the zoladz review at all but i wouldn't having listened to this 500 times in the past four days
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:45 (ten years ago)
"at all" is too strong, she's generally right about the first four songs
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:49 (ten years ago)
she's right in pointing out that it's a flawed album with at least a half dozen good to awesome songs.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 00:56 (ten years ago)
well i could've done that
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:02 (ten years ago)
i really don't follow the complaint that some of the songs sound too similar to other artists, or that its anything out of the ordinary that taylor might be taking influence from her peers. one of the greatest things about the best pop music is how it has always cannibalised other influences and put its individual stamp on them.
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:10 (ten years ago)
otm, one of the better examples of this is the last two fob records
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:18 (ten years ago)
I don't disagree with zoladz's take exactly, but I feel like the question of whether Taylor is smoothing her personality of out her work in favour of pop conformity (see also Chris Richards' review) is a bit more complicated than it's largely being portrayed, which is very much "lyrical ditties circa Fearless vs pristine polished corporate pop".
Perhaps because the moment we set up this dichotomy we start to elide over the relative differences in the amount of "personality" exhibited by corporate pop stars, and, similarly, the equivalent differences in county-pop.
Maybe it's just immaterial to some listeners that "All You Had To Do Was Stay" and "I Wish You Would" and "How You Get The Girl" could be sung by Carly Rae Jepsen without any major changes, whereas the same songs in Katy's hands would probably be quite different. Is there really a meaningful difference, they might ask.
But treating corporate pop as all one thing seems to me to be as fuzzy as treating country-pop as all one thing - the implicit result of which would be classing (say) "You Belong With Me" alongside RaeLynn's "God Made Girls".
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:26 (ten years ago)
that STAAAY hook in "All You Had to Do Was Stay" is fucking insidious. A guy with three kids caught me pumping my first singing it at a red light.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:27 (ten years ago)
When you think happinessI hope you think that little black dressThink of my head on your chestAnd my old faded blue jeans
x
You see me in hindsightTangled up with you all nightBurn it downSome day when you leave meI bet these memories hunt you around
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:30 (ten years ago)
thematically "wildest dreams" is about as classic taylor as it gets. not exactly an ldr lyric generator.
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:31 (ten years ago)
The lack of specificity in Bad Blood makes the size of its drama and chorus seem unearned. What exactly was the betrayal? What about this friendship was worth lamenting the loss of? Also makes it hard to decide if the song is a "I feel so betrayed and sad" situation or an "I'm about to fight this girl" situation.
A lot of the rest of this works because of vocal production and specifically a lot of what Taylor chooses to do with her voice here. They seem like little details but the way she delivers a lot of this stuff ("both went mad" in Wonderland, etc.) is what gives it distinction and identity.
― Greer, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:31 (ten years ago)
Wildest Dreams is LDR more in the atmospheric sonics and airy delivery rather than lyrics. Thematically it's not far away either though Lana would up the mentions of whiskey and daddies in the lyrics by about 400%.
― Greer, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:33 (ten years ago)
Swift only threatens to sound like the competition when Shellback-Martin-Tedder do stutters: "I Know Places" and especially "Wonderland" with its 2011-era "eh eh"s
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:34 (ten years ago)
The "eh eh" has an expiration date. It's not as timeless as the "na na".
― Greer, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 01:45 (ten years ago)
Umbrella was earlier than 2011 I'm pretty sure
― 龜, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:00 (ten years ago)
I'm thinking of Bieber's "Beauty and a Beat," when I said, "OK, enough" but that was 2012.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:13 (ten years ago)
I can't get past how "Blank Space" sounds like a crummy Avril Lavigne song to a point of liking it as much as the rest of y'all.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:30 (ten years ago)
I think I would litereally die and my soul would sublimate and go to heaven if Taylor did an album of Avril covers
― 龜, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:32 (ten years ago)
"Blank Space" on first listen sounds like it's sampling Club Nouveau's "Why You Treat Me So Bad."
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:36 (ten years ago)
I've only listened to the album once but I just drank a bottle of wine and so I think 1) this album is full of treasures and 2) this is better than Red
― 龜, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 02:37 (ten years ago)
this is how i've been playing it:1. New Romantics2. Blank Space3. Style4. Out of the Woods5. All You Had To Do Was Stay6. I Wish You Would7. Wildest Dreams8. How You Get The Girl9. This Love10. I Know Places11. You Are In Love12. Cleanwhich is everything.
My tracklist:
1. New Romantics2. Blank Space3. Style4. Out of the Woods5. Wonderland6. All You Had To Was Stay7. I Wish You Would8. Bad Blood9. Wildest Dreams10. This Love11. I Know Places12. Clean
Agree 100% that "New Romantics" is very important, and makes a great opener, but I would say that it's "Shake It Off" done right: "I could build a castle / out of all the bricks they threw at me" set to a hyper-colossal chorus melody is such a better response to her "haters" than "I'm gonna shake shake shake it off."
The processed "ah ah hah ah ah ah!" wordless vocal hook leading into the chorus is everything that is great about music. Like I just want to play that hook on repeat forever.
― Driver 8, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 04:41 (ten years ago)
nearly cried to "you are in love" twice today? felt like alfred should know
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 04:43 (ten years ago)
Style, guys. Style. 50s iconography with the ~sound~ of those guitars and everything in general and etc etc etc etc etc etc etc
― Insane Prince of False Binaries (Gukbe), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 06:22 (ten years ago)
Driver 8 I approve of your discussion of "New Romantics" but leaving "You Are In Love" off the tracklist is one of the craziest things to have happened in this thread.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 06:24 (ten years ago)
seconding ^
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 07:17 (ten years ago)
the rumours are terrible and cruelbut honey most of them are true
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 09:32 (ten years ago)
her best since Fearless, fo sho. though i have no idea what music from 1989 really sounded anything like any of this.
― jamiesummerz, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 10:14 (ten years ago)
They'll tell you oi'm insane.
― how's life, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 10:30 (ten years ago)
Glad she only went with that once or twice in the song.
― how's life, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 10:37 (ten years ago)
I've gotta track down this New Romantics joint though. Not on the standard iTunes edition .
― how's life, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 10:38 (ten years ago)
http://www.popjustice.com/briefing/1989-words-on-the-new-taylor-swift-album/131956/ - the best review i read.I'm sad that there aren't more people that agree that this Is the best album of 2014 so far.
― Nourry, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 12:43 (ten years ago)
A blessing from Popjustice is a sort of kiss of death these days, anyway the album's great.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 12:52 (ten years ago)
Styles in 'James. Dean. Day. Dream.' does that every word a sentence trick from Teenage Dream 'You. Make. Me. Feel. like imma living a. Teen. Age. Dream.' Can anyone think of other Max Martin song which do that?
― Popture, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 12:55 (ten years ago)
What the fuck is with all the ’ in that review?
― how's life, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 12:56 (ten years ago)
I know Chris Richards at the Washington Post tends to make people mad, especially when he makes fun of That's My Favorite Band! or takes potshots, but I thought his putdown of the album was solid:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2014/10/27/taylor-swifts-1989-a-pivot-into-pop-a-misstep-into-conformity/
I don't necessarily agree, but I thought this was a good take: "She’s gone from describing adolescence like an adult to describing adulthood like an adolescent."
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 13:21 (ten years ago)
For a review I fundamentally disagree with, that's excellent.
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 13:36 (ten years ago)
excellent review, albeit one that describes the album i feared it would be rather than the album it is - but for all that there's an element of truth to it, both in the sense that "welcome to new york" and "bad blood" and "shake it off" still exist regardless of whether i've deleted them and you can't ignore them, and in her desire to do this sort of album in the first place. she gets a lot of the sonics right, and more distinct than i'd have imagined, but not all the time - on long stretches of the album the production is really the thing that lets it down, and it's only because of her songwriting and especially vocal delivery that you can ignore it. i adore "out of the woods" but a lot of its production touches make me wince. i love "wildest dreams" but mimicking LDR so exactly doesn't feel like a good move. she pulls off meta a lot better than she's ever done but there's an air of consciousness about this album that probably ultimately puts it a step below her previous three for me. i mean, i love it and i can't stop listening, but the flaws are larger than before. (it may well end up my AOTY because there's nothing else that's really a contender, just about 20 albums that feel like the fifth best of the year.)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:08 (ten years ago)
and that review is much better than popjustice's increasingly propagandist insistence on One True Pop Path, even if i probably rate the album closer to PJ than richards
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:09 (ten years ago)
the post review is pretty OTM in most ways, i just think the songs that are really good elevate it above the v. understandable criticisms he has. that said, it doesn't work nearly as well as a full, front-to-back album as red does.
― blood on the peaves (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:25 (ten years ago)
i don't think there's necessarily a greater number of worse songs on this than on red - the bonus tracks weren't any good and i deleted the duets and "sad beautiful tragic" - but the bad songs here feel much more egregious. it's harder to ignore (you've deleted) the omnipresent first single and the opening track (especially when they've always been one of her strengths).
i don't really like comparing her albums this soon because my opinions always shift with her but it immediately sounds better than speak now to me, which seems really limp nowadays standing next to fearless and red.
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:38 (ten years ago)
which ever way this falls amongst the rest of her discography i'd say she now has the best run of initial five albums since pj harvey & tori.
― prolego, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:41 (ten years ago)
wut sad beautiful tragic is great!!!!! agree about the bonus tracks tho except for that acoustic version of state of grace, really dug that
― blood on the peaves (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 14:53 (ten years ago)
Come Back Be Here and Girl At Home should've been on the Red standard replacing the two duets or Stay Stay Stay.
― Greer, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 15:10 (ten years ago)
That review makes some valid points. I'm not sure there an adolescent tone dominating the album (for instance, I don't find "Clean" an adolescent song, and even "Shake it off" finds some redemption in the context of the album, though I still think it was a bad pick for a single, sounding silly when isolated from the rest of the songs), but it's true that there's less "wiser than her age" stuff here, and that's a trend that started with "Red". And I imagine that can be related to her abandoning her "thoughtful teenager" persona in favor of the new "passionate young adult". However, that sounds like a natural progression in the process of growing up, which, to me, is what her music's all about.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 15:20 (ten years ago)
i always assumed that rhythm in "teenage dream" was a benny blanco contribution -- ke$ha's "blah blah blah" has literally the exact same rhythm on the chorus, and he's the only writer common to both tracks. i don't think the chorus in "style" is really that similar at all fwiw.
― dyl, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 15:48 (ten years ago)
"She’s gone from describing adolescence like an adult to describing adulthood like an adolescent."
Yeah this feels true but also feels like a pretty typical life progression to me.
So much of Taylor's early work was posited from a future position of wisdom (and at times emotional satiation) which made sense of past emotional turmoil: on "Tim McGraw" she sings about a relationship "three summers back"; on "Love Story" she starts off "we were both young when I first saw you"; "Mary's Song" actually fast forwards through life to old age; "Mine" does the same trick but only to the point of adult relationship stability. Even "Dear John" feels like it's being told at a much greater temporal distance to its subject matter than is the case - "Don't you think I was too young?" she sings, suggesting maybe she's not now.
This is contrasted with the songs about looking back on childhood and wanting to retreat back there ("The Best Day", "Never Grow Up", arguably "Innocent").
But really they're part of the same attitude to life, as "Fifteen" (which adopts both positions) proves: a sense that Taylor is caught between the simplicity of childhood and actually having it figured out, and hence feels "out of time". A lot of her early work is sung from that perspective.
I think the increasing focus on a sensuous now (which, as discussed above, really begins with "Treacherous", though there are some prior hints) reflects an implied realisation that adulthood doesn't ultimately deliver a "how-to" guide which unlocks everything; the "out of time" feeling doesn't necessarily go away, so instead of singing from a point that imagines its resolution you may as well enjoy it.
A lot of people I know IRL became much less serious and more "adolescent" over the course of their twenties than they had seemed at school/university.
(where's that ILX post about girls in their twenties being thinkpieces and in their thirties being horn dogs?)
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 15:56 (ten years ago)
Yeah this feels true but also feels like a pretty typical life progression to me....A lot of people I know IRL became much less serious and more "adolescent" over the course of their twenties than they had seemed at school/university.
omg snap, was literally about to post p much this - one of the biggest surprises about adulthood has been that most people get LESS serious and stop worrying as they grow up (which i always linked with pills). one of the reasons it's been so surprising is that pop culture, generally, tells you that this will not be the case: teenagerhood is the time for bubblegum pop and frivolous feelings, adulthood is the time for Serious Shit. the arc of taylor's career is true to life experience but goes completely against the grain of most pop careers, where the usual route is to make a Serious Credible Move to exorcise teenage frivolity. (taylor's genius is in that she is simultaneously doing this anyway)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:06 (ten years ago)
the rub is that these adults think they're not acting adolescently.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:06 (ten years ago)
My brother texted me about the Post review and asked me if I wrote it under a pseudonym (lol)
― kissaroo and Tyler, too (DJP), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:31 (ten years ago)
Being a teenager and wanting to be older and wiser, and then growing up and wanting to preserve some of your teenagerhood doesn't sound that strange to me. She's now the same age Paul Westerberg was when he made "Let it be" and, for all her Springsteen comparisons, she's now roughly as old as the Boss was circa "Born to run", to name a few albums from guys in their mid-twenties clinging to their adolescence.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:10 (ten years ago)
Not coincidentally, Let It Be and Born to Run are the points at which Paul and Bruce broke out and really became themselves, or at least became what people still think of them to be. But Taylor seems to be going the opposite route, becoming something else that does not always suit her. Those older dudes became (or were perceived) as more honest, more authentic, more original, more brave, more ambitious or whatever. Taylor seems less all of those things with this album, which is the rare example of breaking out by becoming in many ways more conservative, more safe.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
(anyway, there's no "clinging" in 1989, that's true, but I just wanted to point out that a certain "adolescent" view of romance and life at her age is not only not necessarily inappropiate, but also well documented)
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:18 (ten years ago)
She doesn't sound stable at all -- she sounds as unhinged as many ing of us were in our twenties. She's fucking around with guys who got their own things on the side (like her), all while living in a ig bold new city.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:19 (ten years ago)
* cross out that first ing
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:20 (ten years ago)
I can see where the accusations of conservatism for this album come from, but I can't help finding them unfair, or at least not telling the whole story. I'm aware this is, of all the sharp turns she may have chosen for her career, the most convenient; this is no "Metal Machine Music". However, it's still a big departure from previous records, one that will alienate at least part of her previous following (I know I found "Shake it off" alienating), and it's hard for me to think of that as a conservative move. I suppose it depends on whether you look at it as part of the big picture (her new album decidedly entrenched in pop, the dominant force) or in the context of her career in particular (where this is a disruptive move).
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 17:36 (ten years ago)
We're taking degrees of relativity here, but there is no way a (mostly) total collaboration with the biggest hitmaker of the past 15 or so years can be considered anything but conservative. Like I think I said earlier, because country, even nominal country, is possibly the single most conservative genre, it doesn't take much to stand out, which is why Swift made such an impact. But in the pop field, where nearly anything goes (if you commit to it), Swift sounds so staid and safe. Granted, she's dipping a toe (deep) in, but so far she lacks the pop instincts to, say, pick some less obvious quantity producer to help her out, or even really push Max Martin way out of his wheelhouse. She leans on him like a crutch, because he is. As Robyn described it,
He has a very particular way of looking at songs. He is a hit machine. That's his specialty. But that's what he does. He writes songs. He's not an artist. He doesn't have the need for expressing his personal thoughts in a song. For him, it's about the melody. It's about cracking a code, being as efficient as possible
Personally, I would have rather had a Taylor Swift "Shake It Up" than a "Shake It Off," and she seemed just the right act to do it, and this album the perfect (missed) opportunity. I want Swift to right the book, not follow the book.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:42 (ten years ago)
the book was listing heavily before Taylor got her hands on it
― kissaroo and Tyler, too (DJP), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 18:45 (ten years ago)
I only got this yesterday, so I'm behind the curve, but after four times through it felt to me like a solid 7/10. To quantify further I ranked each track (don't have the bonus tracks) like so:
Welcome to NY -- 4Blank Space -- 8Style -- 9Out of the Woods -- 9All You Had to Do Was Stay -- 7Shake It Off -- 7I Wish You Would -- 6Bad Blood -- 4Wildest Dreams -- 6How You Get the Girl -- 7This Love -- 7I Know Places -- 6Clean -- 8
Which, averaged out, gives a 6.8 -- a solid 7/10. The ballads are likely to grow on me, and I still need to hear the bonus tracks. But basically I think this is a good Taylor Swift album with some great songs. Not an earth-shaking insight, I know.
I wonder if she has a prospective timeline drawn up. Somewhere in there is the inevitable grown-up singer-songwriter album ("Taylor goes acoustic!"), and eventually the return to Nashville ("Reconnects with her roots!"). The album about her marriage. The album about her divorce. Etc.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:01 (ten years ago)
i... don't think i like this album? it's not sticking. I'll try a few more times.
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:07 (ten years ago)
holy shit "style"
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
also i love how the 1st verse of out of the woods gets to "we were lying on my couch" and suddenly shifts into SEVERELY FOREBODING minor-key territory, like whoa, didn't realize lying on couches could be so wrong
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:36 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:44 (ten years ago)
so this is somewhere between 'a triumph' and 'probably a slightly better pop album than the carly rae jepsen one was'
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
y are we not discussing gated drums more
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:52 (ten years ago)
big big gated drums
like we should take the 1980s stuff seriously and stop talking about jepsen and perry and etc and really think about phil collins and yes springsteen imho.
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 19:53 (ten years ago)
I really like this album but no way is it better than the Carly Rae Jepsen one
― boxedjoy, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 20:18 (ten years ago)
Well I believe she has admitted in interviews that the snare sound in "I Wish You Would" was sampled from "She Drives Me Crazy".
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 20:25 (ten years ago)
Ugh, really? I do think it's funny that FYC of all things would be her '80s signifier.
She should put out a ska album.
Hah, damn you, homonyms.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
The album about her divorce.
Holy shit has she been practicing for this.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 20:50 (ten years ago)
A lot of the complaints about Taylor having gone total mainstream pop feel quite ahistorical to me in the way they're framed. They make it seem like a totally mainstream pop sound has only existed since 1999, and that max martin has had a single coherent sound throughout.
Given the album's explicit concept, I think it's worth asking whether we do see thsee songs as somehow constitutively different to the kind of pop that was being made in the late eighties.
I feel like if we were coming to this album as a historical artifact - something posted on the eighties female mor-pop to art-pop continuum thread, say - it would sound quite different to our ears.
As stylistic trappings harden into carbon dated period-signifiers, I think questions of whether the songwriting itself is distinct or pandering or outright eccentric become sharper.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:24 (ten years ago)
Speaking of Max Martin I don't think this album sounds particularly Max Martin.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:34 (ten years ago)
xpost Well, I can only assume TS is a better lyricist than Debbie Gibson or Paula Abdul. Or whoever wrote those lyrics. One thing Swift has done, perhaps inadvertently, is glommed onto a particularly vapid period of pop and attempted to lend it substance.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:35 (ten years ago)
What does "sounds Max Martin" even mean anyway - dude is incredibly flexible when he decides he has to be.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:43 (ten years ago)
yeah I mean this doesn't sound like Femme Fatale
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:45 (ten years ago)
One thing Swift has done, perhaps inadvertently, is glommed onto a particularly vapid period of pop and attempted to lend it substance.
hm :|
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 21:58 (ten years ago)
I cosign that hm
this doesn't sound v 80s to me but then my refs are uk hence human league and not Debbie g
I think this has been a kinda weird year or two for the concept 'mainstream pop' particularly in relation to how its tween teen and adult fan bases perceive and are perceived by one another
mb that's bollocks tho
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:05 (ten years ago)
What's clear from Taylor's own discussion of the 1989 concept is that she conceives of the era as a time when artists were using pop as a way of playing with style and self-expression and etc. Obviously Like A Prayer is a key text here even if Taylor's album doesn't necessarily resemble it much. I certainly suspect that her idea of 1989 pop isn't a specific one of Debbie Gibson and Paula Abdul and Martika and Roxette. This was also the year of Rhythmn Nation 1814 incidentally.
One of the reasons I started the over-produced female vocalist mor-pop to art-pop continuum of the 80s and sometimes early 90s, often but not necessarily from Canada thread was to explore the idea that what we consider to be 80s "pop" sounds often had much wider purchase than just in the work of "vapid" chartpop stars (scarequotes intentional); this was the sonic dialect of a whole era, and many artists who could never hope to be popstars per se, who we would probably frame in much more "artistic" terms, were playing around with these styles. 1989 may resemble Electric Youth more than it does The Speckless Sky but not by very much.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:46 (ten years ago)
Oh, I agree. "The 80s" was much more interesting a pop era than many give it credit for. But I have long disdained the particularly soulless brand of pop ascendant at the end of the decade. Then again, maybe it was only in my dreams.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:53 (ten years ago)
The purported 80s influence on this album is a total red herring. I hear one blatant 80s-sound alike track, "Welcome To New York," which could fit in quite easily on the debut albums from either Depeche Mode or Madonna. And I guess "Out of the Woods," which as been noted, kind of sounds like Chvrches, who are themselves referencing the 80s, so you get Taylor … borrowing from a contemporary band who are themselves borrowing from the 80s?
But a track like "New Romantics," despite its 80s-referencing title, doesn't sound 80s at all, it sounds totally modern. Ditto "Wonderland," with its little "eh eh eh" crib from Rihanna that has already been remarked upon in this thread. If "Wildest Dreams" does in fact sound like Lana Del Rey, and I think it does, that's not 80s. Then you get the lyrics: in "New Romantics" I count cribs from/allusions to Lorde ("we're all so bored with everything"), Lady Gaga ("It's poker / he can't see it in my face / I'm about to play my ace") and Lana Del Rey again ("heartbreak is the national anthem"), and those are just the ones I caught, because I haven't listened to Katy Perry's last album, etc. So the bulk of the album isn't "80s" at all.
I think the whole "80s" thing stems from Taylor's innate desire to have a "concept" to build her albums around, and the fact that 1989 was her birth year. I never exactly understood how all of the songs on Speak Now fit into the "you shouldn't hold back your feelings, you should speak now" concept in the liner notes: I can see how "Dear John" ties into that, but what does "Never Grow Up" have to do with that concept, exactly? The same problems apply to this concept: as I noted above, "Welcome To New York" sounds like it was lifted off of a record from the 1981/82/83 period, certainly not from a record from the end of the decade. Having not actually lived through the 80s, she understandably has about as much concept of what actually happened when in the 80s as the movie Hot Tub Time Machine, which was riddled with anachronisms and blended different sub-eras of "the 80s" into one contemporary fantasy about what the 80s were like.
Before this album was officially announced, there were rumors that it was going to be called Polaroid, and I think that would have made for a far better title and concept than 1989.
― Driver 8, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 22:54 (ten years ago)
eh, the samples sound like they'd slot comfortably next to a lot of 80s pop (e.g., debbie gibson). sounds good, actually.
― Daniel, Esq 2, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:29 (ten years ago)
naaaaaaaw man y'see she went Stringer Bell up in, elastic as hell
― quarter pound cronenburger, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:32 (ten years ago)
Well, I can only assume TS is a better lyricist than Debbie Gibson or Paula Abdul
Debbie Gibson was actually a bit of an 80s pre-figuration of Taylor, i.e., a teenage female artist who wrote all of her own material and brought an above-average level of intelligence and craft to what was widely perceived by Serious Music Fans of the era as a throwaway pop genre. Taylor is of course on a whole other level than Gibson as an lyricist, and as a commercial juggernaut, but, at the time, I liked Out of the Blue for some of the same reasons I like Taylor today.
― Driver 8, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:34 (ten years ago)
the multi-tracked choir-cum-gang of taylors on the bridge and last chorus of 'blank space' is pretty great, some of them are doing imogen heap and some are doing pop ingenue and some of them are doing country
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:38 (ten years ago)
Choir Cum Gang underrated band of 80s cartoon misfits
― quarter pound cronenburger, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:38 (ten years ago)
"Style" and "Out of the Blue" have sonic similiarities.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:44 (ten years ago)
i really like the phrasing of "are we in the clear yet? good."
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 28 October 2014 23:50 (ten years ago)
Many of the comparisons I've seen in reviews between the songs in 1989 and late eighties/early nineties pop music feel somewhat shoehorned, forced upon the album because, well, the whole 1989 sound concept feels forced or at least not very succesfully pulled out; it sounds more contemporary than retro. I've read comparisons between "I wish you would" and Go West's "King of Wishful Thinking" and "Out of the Woods" and Roxette which made me go WTF.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 12:00 (ten years ago)
Oh God I've been away from the boards and forgot that this is where we congregate when Taylor albums come out.
Everyone here has already said most important stuff - Blank Space and Style and New Romantics are perfect, I Know Places I'm not sure about but enjoy on and off, Bad Blood is a pile of meh, Welcome to New York is abysmal, especially given how well Twift normally sets a tone and theme and thesis for her albums with the opening track. Not sure if New Romantics belongs as track one though - Blank Space is an abrupt start to the album and a bit jarring but it also is a pretty good Taylor 2014 manifesto.
Way better than I expected, pretty damn great actually, but since Speak Now the worst tracks on her albums keep getting worse (the best ones keep getting better, though) so I need to either edit the track list or just skip as necessary.
Shake It Off has grown on me, especially on the dance floor but it interrupts the flow of the album like nothing else.
I would say the theme of the album is 'Harry Styles is a terrible driver' but back on Red, "you almost ran the red cause you were looking over at me"
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:26 (ten years ago)
You'd think moving to New York would have cut down on the "riding with boys in cars" imagery. But I guess "Midnight/ You wait 25 minutes for the downtown C train" doesn't have quite the same ring.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:32 (ten years ago)
I wish more artists would record and release stand-alone singles and EPs that don't end up on an upcoming album.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:33 (ten years ago)
Taylor does Lana was more jarring than Taylor does Lorde or Taylor does Churches but they mostly get subsumed into Taylor's shtick.
Really hope this isn't the last time she works with Nathan Chapman - his harmony parts still feel quintessential Taylor and I think he's still the best at producing her voice? Maybe just because they've worked together the longest, though.
It feels more cohesive than RED easily? Speak Now was more bloated than Fearless but despite the length and sonic experimentation still hung together. cutting Innocent and Haunted and maybe one other track would definitely strengthen the impact of Last Kiss (whose impact I think gets dulled by sheer exhaustion) and Long Live but the record still feels like it's all one thing. RED is this weird mix of classic Taylor (done both well and less well), Taylor pushing forward Speak Now-era experiments (trying new Taylor-ish things like Red or Holy Ground or State of Grace) and the three Max Martin collabs which are all great pop songs and are clearly by Taylor but feel like a weird little EP stuffed into the album. So like, cut Sad Beautiful Tragic and The Last Time and maybe I Almost Do and it's a great collection of songs but it still feels like three albums.
Whereas even if 1989 isn't quite as strong lyrically or production-wise it gains something by feeling like Taylor isn't in transition between sounds anymore? Cut Shake It Off and you have a record where Taylor's harnessed Martin and Shellback and Antinoff and whoever's production firmly into her vision.
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:41 (ten years ago)
The words as full stop sentences in Style are magical though.
Even if it's the same trick as Teenage Dream it plays out totally differently? Katy's "You. Make. Me. Feeling like I'm living a Teen. Age. Dream." uses the exclaimed syllables as ecstatic with the normally paced lyrics as the filler in between them with release in the explanations and that final "don't ever look back"?
Taylor's stark syllables in 'Style' feel like they build tension that gets released in the more rapidly paced bits that follow? "James. Dean. Day. Dream. Look in your eeeeeeyes." "Red. Lip. Cla. Ssic. Thing that you liiiiiiiike." "Cra. Shing. Down. We come back every tiiiiiime."
I think on reflection it's that Teenage Dream's one syllable exclamations are syncopated and Style's are all on the beat, so in Style they drive forward the lyrics to the propulsive bits that syncopate only on that last extended word of each line.
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:56 (ten years ago)
also are her backing vocals saying 'just take me out" or "take me home"?
they're almost as hard to discern as the backing vocals in Holy Ground but if it's the latter I will giggle endlessly at the reference.
― twinkin' and drinkin' and ready to fly (Alex in Montreal), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 13:57 (ten years ago)
It's "take me home" because of course it is.
― Greer, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 14:03 (ten years ago)
omg omg omg i just got this where should I start ahhhhh
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:13 (ten years ago)
at track 2
― prolego, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:15 (ten years ago)
― how's life, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:17 (ten years ago)
I quite disagree with a couple of the assumptions and conclusions in this review:
Yet even with its stilted lyrics about sex, 1989 is important because it’s filled with evidence of the insidious damage the patriarchal influence on romance does to young women. Taylor used to write about love with a sparkly-eyed innocence. Now, she writes of it like a superficial and draining war of the sexes.
http://www.wonderingsound.com/feature/taylor-swift-1989-big-machine-records-review/
Even in the "You Belong With Me" days she wrote and sung as if love was fun and a pain in the ass.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:47 (ten years ago)
"Picture to burn" for christ's sake.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:50 (ten years ago)
"Should have said no" would be another early example.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:52 (ten years ago)
omg wonderingsound just need to stop talking about taylor swift
― prolego, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:56 (ten years ago)
beyond that piece i think maybe part of the problem with critics misreading taylor swift is they heard fearless first, rather than her s/t
― prolego, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:58 (ten years ago)
but then again:
the evolution of her hetero-normative sexual dominance began with her self-titled debut, when the height of romance was finding a boy who thought her eyes shone brighter than Georgia stars as on “Tim McGraw.”
lol??????
― prolego, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
like are you criticising her for selling a false image of sparkly-eyed innocence happily-ever-after fairytales or the for the idea that all love will constantly end in misery? at least be consistent. and if you're going to cloak your intense dislike of taylor swift in a thinkpiece about how she perpetuates misogyny maybe don't let the veil slip with a misogynistic quip near the end like "she still has her army of Polaroid-collecting, screaming, little-girl fans (and their parents) to protect"
― prolego, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
reading back since friday and you guys did a really good job covering this, too many posts for me to otm all of them.
thing i'd add is to my absolute non-surprise this doesn't work well as an album and i'll never play it in order again. putting the only songs that could qualify as "breathers" at tracks 9, 11, and 13 was not a good choice. i think in her commitment to making a pop record she forgot that really good pop records are better-paced and have more dynamics than this does. the structural similarities between the songs start to pile up too--she obvs writes tons of good middle 8s but i could really use like, a coda or two to keep things interesting.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
she still has her army of Polaroid-collecting, screaming, little-girl fans (and their parents) to protect
Yeah I read something the other day, don't remember what, that made me think about how often and casually Taylor is indicted via reference to her "little girl" fans. I know it's true that she does have little girl fans -- there were tons of them at the Taylor concert I saw in 2011 -- but there's so much ugliness packed into using that phrase dismissively.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:05 (ten years ago)
I am not convinced that people aren't conflating "review I disagree with" with "terrible review, stop writing forever," considering this has happened with Swift (and Swift more than any other artist I can think of) for years now.
(short version: I thought their piece was quite good.)
― katherine, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
(also think 1989 is quite good but have been too busy w/ work to write anything)
― katherine, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:18 (ten years ago)
"There is just no fairytale ending promised at the end of every song here. By pop-ifying her confessions, she has traded the personal for the jaded truisms that come out of the mouths of women in their mid-20s in New York bars, tired of being victimized by men but unsure how to escape the cycle."
this piece is extremely confusing!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:23 (ten years ago)
some spiteful trash is what it is
― r|t|c, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:25 (ten years ago)
Her line about 1989 sounding like 1999 was good, and the stuff she dislikes is the stuff that excites me, but that's fine. Opinions, etc. Her conclusions about Swift's approach to romance looked like a misreading of what she used to write in 2006 and 2008 and rests on a binary. After all, thinking in terms of a "war of the sexes" could be an example of a sparkly-eyed innocence. And if "I Wish You Would" and "Style" are any indication a war of the sexes sounds fun.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:26 (ten years ago)
The review also assumes the album is a broad statement on romantic relationships. I don't really agree with that. The liner notes in "1989" made me grow accustomed to the idea it chronicles the ups and downs of a very particular toxic relationship (and btw this as a concept sounds to me as a more accurate description of the album than the nostalgic pop idea). I don't see anything here really fundamentally contradicting or rejecting what was written before, but building on it by adding shades and ambiguity.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:30 (ten years ago)
Purely anecdotally, I find it really curious that my older daughter, who is about to turn 10 and was really into "Speak Now" and "Fearless," was barely into "Red" and has expressed absolutely no interest in the new one. I wonder how many of those "little girl" fans are growing up with Taylor, how many new fans she is gaining, or whether seeing Taylor when she tours next will be akin to the handful of "American Idol" tours I saw, with parents excited and waving signs and their bored kids slumped next to them. I really have no idea. Perhaps, ironically enough, my older daughter is not quite old enough to appreciate or recognize what may or may not be going on in Swift's songs, and just hears her pop stuff as any other Radio Disney pop stuff, and treats it as equally disposable/interchangeable.
I do have girl-friend peers - which is to say, closer to 40 than 10 - who never seemed to be into Swift before but have come aboard since "Red" and really seem to be into her as a pop star in the same bow down before royalty sense that some worship Beyonce. I'm not even sure my daughters know who Beyonce is! I should ask them.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 17:59 (ten years ago)
I feel like that wondering sound review takes points I generally agree with about certain songs, general themes and then reaches some truly out there conclusions about the album as a whole, like overstating the role of Max Martin and Ryan Tedder:
That her self-actualization requires the help of pop’s super-producer boys club, including Max Martin and Ryan Tedder, is disheartening — Swift has always been lauded for her solo songwriting, but to “come into her own” as a pop artist, she is relying on men to create her sound.
Okay, but Speak Now is the only album in her catalog where she is the exclusive writer on every track. Nathan Chapman and Liz Rose have worked with her on writing since her debut and Chapman produced every song on Speak Now. Why the sudden rewriting of history and elevation of the role of her male collaborators to claim she needed men to craft her sound? She's also credited as a producer on nearly half the tracks here. Did her going pop mean we had to start underrating her contributions to her own music the way we do for other women in pop music?
― Greer, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 19:12 (ten years ago)
For another youthful perspective, my 7-year-old daughter loves "Today Was a Fairytale", "Eyes Open", "I Knew You Were Trouble", "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" and "Sweeter Than Fiction". She thinks "Shake It Off" is even more fantastic. But, interestingly, she doesn't like "Out of the Woods" very much. Her observation is that usually you can clearly understand the words Taylor is singing, and on "Out of the Woods" it's harder.
― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 19:47 (ten years ago)
my sister has aged well out of "polaroid-toting fans" or whatever (she's a few years younger than me) but I just asked her thoughts and her reasoning: "as someone her age I feel like I grew up with her and she wrote music catered to what I was going through"
― katherine, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 19:59 (ten years ago)
Your sister dated Harry Styles?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
For another youthful perspective, my 7-year-old daughter loves "Today Was a Fairytale", "Eyes Open", "I Knew You Were Trouble", "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" and "Sweeter Than Fiction". She thinks "Shake It Off" is even more fantastic. But, interestingly, she doesn't like "Out of the Woods" very much. Her observation is that usually you can clearly understand the words Taylor is singing, and on "Out of the Woods" it's harder.― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:47 PM (Yesterday)
― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, October 29, 2014 7:47 PM (Yesterday)
My four year old son and six year old daughter both love Shake It Off too but are not so big fans of Out Of The Woods. I think it's because they both love to sing along to songs and the chorus of OOTW is a bit too fast for them.
They did both instantly take to Style though.
― groovypanda, Thursday, 30 October 2014 10:14 (ten years ago)
looks like she's taking her fanbase with her
Taylor Swift's 1989 continues to rack up monster sales, as industry forecasters now say the album could sell 1.2 million copies in its first week (ending Nov. 2).It's thus nearing the 1.21 million bow of her last album, 2012's Red (which was also the last release to sell a million copies in a week, according to Nielsen SoundScan).Sources say 1989 sold more than 600,000 albums in its first day on sale, mostly from Target (which carried an exclusive version of the album) and Apple's iTunes Store. Apple says 1989 broke the pre-order record in its U.S. store, surpassing One Direction's 195,000 pre-order figure for last year's Midnight Memories.If 1989 sells as forecasted, it will become the biggest-selling album released in 2014 after only one week on sale, have the largest sales week by any album since Red, and make Swift the only act to earn three million-selling weeks.
It's thus nearing the 1.21 million bow of her last album, 2012's Red (which was also the last release to sell a million copies in a week, according to Nielsen SoundScan).
Sources say 1989 sold more than 600,000 albums in its first day on sale, mostly from Target (which carried an exclusive version of the album) and Apple's iTunes Store. Apple says 1989 broke the pre-order record in its U.S. store, surpassing One Direction's 195,000 pre-order figure for last year's Midnight Memories.
If 1989 sells as forecasted, it will become the biggest-selling album released in 2014 after only one week on sale, have the largest sales week by any album since Red, and make Swift the only act to earn three million-selling weeks.
― prolego, Thursday, 30 October 2014 11:54 (ten years ago)
http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/10/mistakes-ive-made-while-high-on-taylor-swift.html
✔
― r|t|c, Thursday, 30 October 2014 13:15 (ten years ago)
You Are in Love is phenomenal. Straighforward lyrics yet I don't feel like I've heard anything just like it.
― abcfsk, Thursday, 30 October 2014 14:32 (ten years ago)
i wrote about this album for a canadian book publishing website
http://penguinrandomhouse.ca/hazlitt/blog/taylor-swift-twelve-ways
― struggle blogger (Andre Gunder Frank 3000), Thursday, 30 October 2014 18:27 (ten years ago)
there's a pretty funny story about the origin of the high pitched Stay in 'All You Had To Do Is Stay' here. It came to her in a dream apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1l3SgR6IqQ
― prince moth mothy moth moth (cajunsunday), Thursday, 30 October 2014 18:37 (ten years ago)
the album's best hook imo
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 October 2014 18:39 (ten years ago)
You are right about that, I added "You Are In Love" to my track list.
― Driver 8, Thursday, 30 October 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
If 1989 sells as forecasted, it will become the biggest-selling album released in 2014 after only one week on sale
this is mental, though I guess thinking about it there haven't really been any major albums that would have sold big in the US this year. In fact the main sellers would be british invaders Sheeran, Sam Smith and Coldplay.
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, 31 October 2014 01:26 (ten years ago)
That makes me love All You Had to Do Was Stay even more now that I know its best quality came in a dream. Like I said upthread, that moment with the very high "Stay!" is the most inspired creative decision on the whole album.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 31 October 2014 02:01 (ten years ago)
i ttly don't get that as an amazing moment but I'm glad ppl like it i guess
― johnny crunch, Friday, 31 October 2014 02:23 (ten years ago)
This Imogen Heap post in her official website's pretty cool and is also an interesting read if you're interested in her current, collaboration-based writing process:
http://imogenheap.com/?article=1321
― cpl593H, Friday, 31 October 2014 03:08 (ten years ago)
I mean Swift's writing process, not Heap's.
― cpl593H, Friday, 31 October 2014 03:09 (ten years ago)
― Greer, Wednesday, October 29, 2014 2:03 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i have been hearing and singing this as "take me up" for the past week
― lex pretend, Saturday, 1 November 2014 15:46 (ten years ago)
the "take me home" middle 8 sounds almost spiritual to me, idec
ann power's take is great: http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2014/10/30/360129727/the-many-new-voices-of-taylor-swift
― prolego, Saturday, 1 November 2014 20:25 (ten years ago)
heard "blank space" on the radio today!
― dyl, Sunday, 2 November 2014 04:40 (ten years ago)
Really love all of this now except 'Bad Blood', which totally gets the gasface, and 'Welcome To New York' which is just clunky. If you're going to write such an obvious ~reinvention~ song at least make it sound exciting.
I don't really get the 'Shake It Off' hate, but then I haven't seen the video and I'm not particularly invested in the idea of Taylor.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 2 November 2014 11:40 (ten years ago)
For some reason "You are in love" is missing from the (15 track) deluxe edition I see on iTunes (in Canada). Can't find it in the US store either. UK and Japan stores have a 19 track deluxe edition including that song and the voice memos, but my Apple account won't let me buy from there.
― Plasmon, Sunday, 2 November 2014 12:02 (ten years ago)
Sales now at 1.3 million.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 November 2014 12:03 (ten years ago)
I don't really get the Bad Blood dislike. I'm not about to jump in and defend it, but just wondering why.
― MikoMcha, Sunday, 2 November 2014 12:39 (ten years ago)
I'm with you MikeMcha
― Nourry, Sunday, 2 November 2014 13:00 (ten years ago)
the most embarrassing bit of hatorade i've seen tossed around re this song is the idea that taylor singing about how it's somehow disingenuous of her to be singing about how people say there's nothing in her brain etc etc because do people REALLY say this about her and even if some do why acknowledge it. first off it's a SONG - john prine wasn't an old woman named after his mother, fyi - second it's probably VERY EASY for taylor swift and many of her fans to think of multiple people who've tried to make them feel dumb - and third where does anybody get off telling swift or anybody else that it's gauche to acknowledge said folks especially in a song that is meant to be advice for getting over such insults.
to be clear i'm not saying people have to love this song. where "hey ya"'s bridge is so charming people miss the song is about dumping someone and then looking for a hook-up, the bridge here is so stiff she's getting shown up on the pop chart by meghan trainor. everyone's free to roll their eyes at a chipper huey lewis empowerment anthem, but this thing where critics act like her songs have to be viewed through her public narrative just makes them look so dim and petty. that they can't fathom how fans might not be like "i love this song because i'm happy taylor swift is shaking off the haters" but rather "this song reminds me get over dumb shit"
― da croupier, Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:02 (ten years ago)
Shake It Off quite simply would be a million times better without that rap section.
― MikoMcha, Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:11 (ten years ago)
should note i'm not saying it's wrong to view songs through her public narrative - stephin merritt doesn't leave clues in the liner notes spelling out "THIS SONG IS ABOUT THE GUY WHO WORE CAPRI PANTS IN CLEVELAND" or whatever. just that critics are supposed to put a little more consideration into it than "it was written by some rich celeb i'm sick of"
― da croupier, Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:11 (ten years ago)
Shake it off doesn't have a rap section though?
― voyou, Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:30 (ten years ago)
Yeah, I think that's a misnomer. It has a cheerleader chant section.
I've come around on Shake It Off (same as I did with "We Are Never") -- it's not an album highlight, but it's a fine little pop song.
"Bad Blood" to me just feels uncharacteristically lazy. Weak lyrics, not much tune to speak of, and she does not really sound invested in it. When she's actually pissed off, you can tell. This just feels almost obligatory, like she has a contract stipulation for a dis track. I do like the way the rhythm is offset from the melody, but that's the only interesting thing about it.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 2 November 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
you have to laugh at grown men sitting around listening to taylor swifts
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Sunday, 2 November 2014 15:06 (ten years ago)
OK, so: rap section, chant section - whatever it is, should never have been put on there imo.
― MikoMcha, Sunday, 2 November 2014 15:10 (ten years ago)
xp is that a parody post, i swear i've seen it a thousand times
― dyl, Sunday, 2 November 2014 16:09 (ten years ago)
I'm a "grown" man, and I don't tend to sit still while listening to this.
― glenn mcdonald, Sunday, 2 November 2014 16:53 (ten years ago)
Other albums I like by 24-year-olds: Highway 61 Revisited, The Velvet Underground & Nico, 1999, Dig Me Out, probably a bunch more.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 2 November 2014 17:22 (ten years ago)
Area Father Takes One More Look At Liner Notes Of Daughter's Taylor Swift Album
― salthigh, Sunday, 2 November 2014 17:27 (ten years ago)
missingNO is just trolling people. Everybody stay cool.
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Sunday, 2 November 2014 17:40 (ten years ago)
Oh I know. But I've heard the same sentiment from a few friends.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:18 (ten years ago)
"Shake It Off" is a great tune and the bridge doesn't really hurt it at all for me. it IS a sick beat tbh.
― some dude, Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:29 (ten years ago)
Wonder how many $0.02 MissingNO has left.
― how's life, Sunday, 2 November 2014 20:37 (ten years ago)
@Tipsy, in all honesty I have heard this too. Or rather, got befuddled and bemused responses. Liking Swift - and this is the first album I know, and love - seems to have made me suspect, as if I have some sort of hidden agenda. He can't possibly like that now, can he?
My response is more or less the same every time: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Sunday, 2 November 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
"Bad Blood" to me just feels uncharacteristically lazy. Weak lyrics, not much tune to speak of, and she does not really sound invested in it. When she's actually pissed off, you can tell.
To me, she sounds invested in it, particularly in the little 'Hey!" interjections that make the track for me. "Band-aids don't fix bullet holes" is kind of an awful line, but I like the rest of lyrics, and that she rhymes "problems" with "solve 'em."
― Driver 8, Sunday, 2 November 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
Might be hearing things but in the voice memo for "Blank Space" she improvs the click before "leave your name" (almost like she was about to forget the words and sucked her teeth) and then it sounds like Max Martin yells "OH MY GOD THAT'S SO ANNOYING WE HAVE TO DO THAT!" Those voice memos are great and I do not regret my Target impulse purchase.
― cr4bdbgs, Monday, 3 November 2014 01:56 (ten years ago)
on first listen i would have taken some of the ballads from the end to break up the beginning but this seems like a damn solid mega-pop album. big hooks and plenty of lyrical meat to chew on (at least from the pov of someone who's favorite single of hers is "red"). i get why folks who didn't want her doing what everyone else is doing aren't into how common it sounds (i still need to revisit that last tegan & sara album after having a similar reaction), but i bet most of them come around on it in a month.
my theory on bad blood:
"lol taylor is this song about me? it's the most forgettable thing on here.""i know, katy"
― da croupier, Monday, 3 November 2014 02:06 (ten years ago)
the whole "1989" concept seems like such a feint - like a way to get olds on board with an album chock full of modern pop
― da croupier, Monday, 3 November 2014 02:08 (ten years ago)
actually the title's not necessarily disingenuous - she might have needed that sense of legacy herself
― da croupier, Monday, 3 November 2014 02:21 (ten years ago)
I really like the half-time drums on the choruses of "I Wish You Would": an old pop-punk/hardcore trick that I'm a sucker. (I guess probably credit Antonoff's emo roots?)
― goodoldneon, Monday, 3 November 2014 03:00 (ten years ago)
she might have needed that sense of legacy herself
That's a good point. Since I've always thought of her as a pop star, it's easy for me to underestimate the whole Nashville-to-New-York thing she's done. I never believed or cared whether she was a country singer, but that was her cocoon of choice, so throwing it off leaves her needing something to hold onto. And '80s pop actually has always been her lodestone -- it was no accident that she did that TV thing with Def Leppard. She is the natural child of Mutt and Shania, and I can believe she has always heard gated drums in her head.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 3 November 2014 03:37 (ten years ago)
i love that re: "i wish you would" too
― dyl, Monday, 3 November 2014 03:46 (ten years ago)
― da croupier, Monday, November 3, 2014 2:21 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yeah this is my suspicion too.
― Tim F, Monday, 3 November 2014 04:37 (ten years ago)
http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6304382/taylor-swift-catalog-removed-from-spotify
what a jerk
― and also pointsman, octopi don't bark (slothroprhymes), Monday, 3 November 2014 18:36 (ten years ago)
Who's the jerk here? Surely not Tyler? Choosing her own most profitable way of distribution, shame on her!
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Monday, 3 November 2014 18:39 (ten years ago)
eh, I definitely don't think she's a jerk, but an artist valuing profit maximization over reaching the most people has not always been admired.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 3 November 2014 19:09 (ten years ago)
It just depends on how much you view spotify as an evil corporation, I guess.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 3 November 2014 19:11 (ten years ago)
Seems like a rather thin and lame reason to criticize and pop artist tbh. As if it is such a shocker popular artists want profit maximization. She knows she will earn more by selling the cd or iTunes, so why put it on spotify? It doesn't do anything for her. Just like Beyoncé dropped her album on paid for iTunes, Swift refused to out it in the I-have-no-idea-what-this-brings-me Spotify. I don't see what the big deal is. It's not like it's against being an artist terms to not have your album in spotify?
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Monday, 3 November 2014 19:15 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pFPisSCg74
― Bringing the mosh (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 3 November 2014 19:44 (ten years ago)
― how's life, Monday, 3 November 2014 19:47 (ten years ago)
i had been ignoring the bonus tracks and i suspect 'new romantics' is actually the best thing
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 3 November 2014 20:02 (ten years ago)
http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6304382/taylor-swift-catalog-removed-from-spotifywhat a jerk― and also pointsman, octopi don't bark (slothroprhymes), Monday, November 3, 2014 6:36 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― and also pointsman, octopi don't bark (slothroprhymes), Monday, November 3, 2014 6:36 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
What a blessing!
― Welcome To (Turrican), Monday, 3 November 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
not really!
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 3 November 2014 20:19 (ten years ago)
man some of y'all sure do view "what a jerk" as an actual vehement criticism in this day & age (for the record - i have much, much stronger words for things i genuinely don't like)
i understand why she's doing it - it's because she can. and knows she can. flaunt that status if u got it bae. it was a convenience for me to listen to on spotify but i'm not like, mad about it exactly. (that is, if she made this decision herself at all and not big machine, which is looking to maximize its assets, and we ain't exactly clear on that just yet.)
(*torrents taylor's entire discography*)
― and also pointsman, octopi don't bark (slothroprhymes), Monday, 3 November 2014 21:37 (ten years ago)
In moral terms, Taylor Swift vs. Spotify is like Godzilla vs. MechaGodzilla. I'm not sure we puny humans really have a rooting interest.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 3 November 2014 21:41 (ten years ago)
can't wait until all new music is available on spotify because all new music is generated by an algorithm on spotify
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:39 (ten years ago)
i understand why she's doing it - it's because she can. and knows she can. flaunt that status if u got it bae.
trying to imagine someone saying this about drag city
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:40 (ten years ago)
Lmao
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:41 (ten years ago)
go on with yo bad self, bill callahan. playa.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:41 (ten years ago)
david berman, just do you
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:43 (ten years ago)
just do david
you guys
― Tim F, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:49 (ten years ago)
yeah, not my best posts, sorry. anyway, the idea of drag city having the power of Taylor Swift was funny.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 00:58 (ten years ago)
still stand by the point people don't respond to drag city (or thom yorke) abandoning spotify with that tone, but yeah, the example was indulgent
― da croupier, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 01:15 (ten years ago)
I get way more annoyed by artists who do vinyl-only releases (which I have no practical way to hear legitimately) than by those who only release on a subset of digital formats - despite doing 90% of my listening on Spotify.
― legit new threat wrt to a norman invasion (seandalai), Tuesday, 4 November 2014 01:17 (ten years ago)
v excited to see Taylor in concert next summer
― Sharkie, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 09:27 (ten years ago)
http://instagram.com/p/vAPN8OjvPb/
― prolego, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 10:44 (ten years ago)
http://31.media.tumblr.com/4ddaca2fbb432f5b6d83753847f05a29/tumblr_nejt16KeXs1qdsft1o4_r1_250.gif
― prolego, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 10:55 (ten years ago)
http://youtu.be/PAhAz7JU0dg
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 13:52 (ten years ago)
She's a money grabber, in it only for money and fame, get over it. She wrote this in WSJ editorial don't forget:
"It’s my opinion that music should not be free."
What does this even mean? No real artist does what they do for money. Real artists would still be doing it regardless. That's how it works. Rich girl, rich dad, spoilt brat, self obsessed.
I mean, Wall Street Journal editorials? Come on. Corporate shill.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 15:52 (ten years ago)
OK let's entertain for entertainment the fact that her "Music should not be free" stern balled editorial wasn't corporate shilling and just the regular blazayblah opinion probably most people on the street might have if you pressed them on this subject of i.p rights and internet downloads that they don't often think about and have never dl'd a song for free in their life. Let's also ignore, for the moment, the fact she's from a rich family a stock broker father and Merril Lynch financial wealth management adviser of millions of dollars. Let's also ignore, for a second, that generation of her grandfathers are banking presidents. Let's also put aside the fact Taylor's parents have been shaping and controlling and market managing her pop career since she was 14, setting up merchendising companies in her name, alienating people with that alleged arrogance and 'pay as little as possible and treat people like shit' attitude.
Let's put all that aside for a brief moment and reconsider her assertion: "It's my opinion that music should not be free".
And remind ourselves: She's only worth $200 million, guys. She only made $120 million on her last tour. We shouldn't forget that. She's only 24. People at 24 with only hundreds of millions in the bank and millions of adoring merchandise wearing fans can only be asked to give so much. I mean come on, her New York penthouse was only bought for $20 million, how do you expect her to keep up this lifestyle? Music should not be free. Music should not be free. It is my opinion that music should not be free.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:30 (ten years ago)
lmaooooooooooooooooooo
― dyl, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:34 (ten years ago)
RT posts bc RT does not know how to not post, you know? If RT wasn't posting, didn't have that outlet, RT would probably not be RT.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 16:53 (ten years ago)
Ha. I think Racoon should get the job of deciding who can be an artist or not and who has to take a dayjob if they're not making enough via Spotify. But before he can get hired, we need to know his dad's job and how much his dad makes.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:04 (ten years ago)
many xposts to the drag city reference: if i'd known that about drag city (keeping shit off spotify, i'm guessing?) i totally would say something similar, i do not consider indie labels or their artists sacred fucking cows, and they can afford to keep their stuff off the service too, for different reasons
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:22 (ten years ago)
and yes we all know how noble and just RT is re: his truth-to-power views on artists having money and doing things solely for da moneyz
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:25 (ten years ago)
i really miss suggest ban sometimes
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 5 November 2014 17:37 (ten years ago)
cadence of the verses in "new romantics" really resembles the mark hoppus part of "i miss you"
*waits for markers to post*
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:02 (ten years ago)
Haven't listened to this in like a week.
― how's life, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:06 (ten years ago)
Don't worry adulthood has many distractions Taylor will understand
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:11 (ten years ago)
i took a break from it and came back to it last night
think it's prob my album of the year despite a lot of misgivings
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:14 (ten years ago)
The chorus to New Romantics reminded me of the "She was gonna be an actress" part of Bowling For Soup's 1985.
― MarkoP, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:25 (ten years ago)
I think I haven't been able to stop listening to it for a week :S
― cpl593H, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:29 (ten years ago)
i haven't listened to it for two days, forced myself to catch up with a backlog of other newish albums (many of which turned out to be really good too)
it's in the running for my aoty but only, tbh, because there hasn't been a clear standout for me this year, just about 20ish albums that sound like the fifth best of the year :/
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:58 (ten years ago)
if i hadn't had that backlog i wouldn't have stopped listening obv
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
Yeah Yeah yeah: Out of the Woods, All You Had to Do Was Stay
Yeah: Blank Space, Style, I Wish You Would, How You Get the Girl, New Romantics
Meh: This Love, Wildest Dreams, I Know Places, Clean
Nah: Welcome to NY, Shake It Off, Bad Blood
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Thursday, 6 November 2014 18:21 (ten years ago)
Q: That leads to the streaming question. We've played the game of wondering whether you would have sold hundreds of thousands of fewer copies last week if the album had been available to people for free via those services. To a lot of people, you're a hero for reinforcing that music still has a value. And then there are some people who think you're standing in the way of progress by not giving in to the streaming model. What are your thoughts on all that?A: If I had streamed the new album, it's impossible to try to speculate what would have happened. But all I can say is that music is changing so quickly, and the landscape of the music industry itself is changing so quickly, that everything new, like Spotify, all feels to me a bit like a grand experiment. And I'm not wiling to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music. And I just don't agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be free. I wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal this summer that basically portrayed my views on this. I try to stay really open-minded about things, because I do think it's important to be a part of progress. But I think it's really still up for debate whether this is actual progress, or whether this is taking the word "music" out of the music industry. Also, a lot of people were suggesting to me that I try putting new music on Spotify with "Shake It Off," and so I was open-minded about it. I thought, "I will try this; I'll see how it feels." It didn't feel right to me. I felt like I was saying to my fans, "If you create music someday, if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it, and it's theirs now and they don't have to pay for it." I didn't like the perception that it was putting forth. And so I decided to change the way I was doing things.
A: If I had streamed the new album, it's impossible to try to speculate what would have happened. But all I can say is that music is changing so quickly, and the landscape of the music industry itself is changing so quickly, that everything new, like Spotify, all feels to me a bit like a grand experiment. And I'm not wiling to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music. And I just don't agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be free. I wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal this summer that basically portrayed my views on this. I try to stay really open-minded about things, because I do think it's important to be a part of progress. But I think it's really still up for debate whether this is actual progress, or whether this is taking the word "music" out of the music industry. Also, a lot of people were suggesting to me that I try putting new music on Spotify with "Shake It Off," and so I was open-minded about it. I thought, "I will try this; I'll see how it feels." It didn't feel right to me. I felt like I was saying to my fans, "If you create music someday, if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it, and it's theirs now and they don't have to pay for it." I didn't like the perception that it was putting forth. And so I decided to change the way I was doing things.
https://music.yahoo.com/blogs/music-news/exclusive--taylor-swift-on-being-pop-s-instantly-platinum-wonder----and-why-she-s-paddling-against-the-streams-085041907.html
― Greer, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:27 (ten years ago)
comparing the music and painting markets maybe not the best move
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:33 (ten years ago)
Shh, the only opinion that matters on this is RT's.
― Greer, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:43 (ten years ago)
it's a really strange way of understanding how music works; does she have this same beef with radio?
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:45 (ten years ago)
how does spotify's compensation of artists compare to radio's?
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
i don't think spotify and radio are actually that comparable
Radio doesn't offer you a song you want at the moment you want it. If the album's on Spotify in high quality and you have access to it in the right places then there's basically no reason to buy it other than to give the artist money.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:50 (ten years ago)
I don't agree with the painting metaphor but I think her stance on this is plenty respectable.
― example (crüt), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:50 (ten years ago)
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:51 (ten years ago)
Also every play on Spotify is heard by one person, a roomful of people at that. A single play on peaktime radio goes out to millions. If you divide royalities-per-play by the number of listeners-per-play then I suspect Spotify pays better, it's just it's never going to have the reach of radio, even if you're Ed Sheeran or Adele.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:52 (ten years ago)
also radio promotes singles, it doesn't replace album sales
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:53 (ten years ago)
but y'know, let's not her point get in the way of squirming at her fine arts metaphor
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:54 (ten years ago)
certainly more comparable than "If you create music someday, if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it, and it's theirs now and they don't have to pay for it."
yes, but still not comparable
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:56 (ten years ago)
also let's not pretend this is only a multimillionaire pop star being greedy when the smallest underground labels have been vocal for a while now about how spotify hurts artists and labels
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:57 (ten years ago)
or what crut said i guessbottom line is that in a perfect world all artists should have an active say in all the ways their art is distributed and sold but that's a REALLY rare occurrence in any field. requires tremendous popularity, savvy business mind, regular output and a lot of luck. Good for taylor that she's at that apex predator state. my quibble is that the "I don't want to set a bad example to artists everywhere" stance tastes a bit disingenuous when the real message appears to be "I don't have to answer to anybody so I'm going to do what I damn well please"
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:58 (ten years ago)
i feel totally blithe re taylor swift removing this from spotify. if she were trying to personally sue anyone who downloaded it, sure
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:59 (ten years ago)
I mean ultimately this genie isn't going to be put back into the bottle because a) the technology exists and millions of people are used to it now and b) the majors are literally bought into it. Actively withdrawing your music from Spotify is only likely to benefit you commercially if you're a massively powerful artist like Taylor or Thom Yorke or whoever, it's unlikely to significantly benefit even an acclaimed smaller band whose music can be illegally downloaded in no time.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 November 2014 19:59 (ten years ago)
in a perfect world we probably wouldn't even understand the concept of art as a thing one could buy or sell yanno *bong hit*
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:00 (ten years ago)
i brought up radio because Taylor's disregard for churning out a pop country radio version of her current singles left a lot of stations handwringing; wondered if she feels like they're not doing enough to make that sort of work worth the trouble.and i don't see anything greedy about her stance, just maybe not entirely transparent
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:00 (ten years ago)
but all I can say is that music is changing so quickly, and the landscape of the music industry itself is changing so quickly, that everything new, like Spotify, all feels to me a bit like a grand experiment. And I'm not wiling to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music.
i mean this is 100% otm and fair. all spotify can respond with (aside from creepy playlists and lyric quotes) is that the record industry was never fair to artists, they're giving what they can and hurm hurm hurm something about majors being equity shareholders pay no mind
xpost if only the powerful would benefit than why is a label like drag city refusing to stream?
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:01 (ten years ago)
to say "look people will illegally download rather than buy the album, so why not provide a legal channel to hear the album that will get you some pennies instead of nothing" is to assume that everyone who would potentially buy your album would rather illegally download it. in which case releasing an album OUTSIDE of spotify is a fool's game. if you're going to bother releasing an album outside of spotify, there's an argument to NOT providing an equally legal but far less profitable alternative for listeners
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:03 (ten years ago)
200 small dance labels left spotify in 2011
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:03 (ten years ago)
I don't think it's absurd that singers, songwriters, producers and musicians are hesitant to make something they've worked on for months available for free on a service that is offering them literal fractions of a penny as compensation.
Not that Taylor's being stiffed as a multimillion dollar pop artist, she could probably take the hit no problem.
― Greer, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:06 (ten years ago)
I can totally see why a *label* would leave, especially one whose main customer base will be amateur laptop DJs, that's a bit different to an artist pulling their work.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:07 (ten years ago)
i've long felt artists should use spotify purely as a promotional device, offering a few push tracks rather than rendering album purchases gratuitous. what taylor's proven is that artists on her level don't even necessarily need the promotion.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:08 (ten years ago)
Aloe Blocc weighs in:
Consider the fact that it takes roughly one million spins on Pandora for a songwriter to earn just $90. Avicii’s release “Wake Me Up!” that I co-wrote and sing, for example, was the most streamed song in Spotify history and the 13th most played song on Pandora since its release in 2013, with more than 168 million streams in the US. And yet, that yielded only $12,359 in Pandora domestic royalties— which were then split among three songwriters and our publishers. In return for co-writing a major hit song, I’ve earned less than $4,000 domestically from the largest digital music service.
http://www.wired.com/2014/11/aloe-blacc-pay-songwriters/
― Greer, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:08 (ten years ago)
a truly rational economy would have taken the externalities into account and fined him millions
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
taylor swift removing her music from spotify is a non issue in a world where avicii remains free
avicii must die
if the primary thrust of your business model is record sales and not touring, it is hard for me to concoct an argument where spotify benefits the artist directly above "word of mouth" or more to the point the only artists i know of who make a living on spotify are people gaming the system with cover songs or parodies
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:11 (ten years ago)
Yeah I don't really see what's in it for artists to stick there album on there in the first few weeks of release, but I guess most of them don't have any say in it at all.
I sometimes wonder if there's any alternative business model that involves paying artists a proper wage rather than expecting them to make it back through record sales but I guess the industry is way too broken for that now.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:12 (ten years ago)
http://open.spotify.com/artist/1eyGtJBOiRGtvXAEhQHpBS
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
well just like any company a label could offer wages. they DO offer wages to their employees. The royalty system is just far more advantageous to labels in most cases. And for smaller labels that engage in fairer profit-sharing, giving wages to all artists would increase overhead considerably and be really risky.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:15 (ten years ago)
i'm not going to be on some "spotify is evil" tip bc 1) as matt says, genie's out of the bottle, if not this way then another 2) it's obviously great for fans and it'd be hypocritical BUTTTT no one should ever be surprised or even critical when an artist decides to push back against it. as with the clampdown on illegal downloading sites etc, there's an element of "don't take my toys away from me" to most of the spotify defences
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:15 (ten years ago)
xp that business model is socialism and you oughta go back to canada you filthy hippy
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:15 (ten years ago)
spotify is evil in the same way most corporations are evil. i use it because it is an AWESOME deal and recommend anyone who can avoid giving me that deal should.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
why does every conversation i get into always wind up involving smooth mcgroove
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
posts very much in character
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:17 (ten years ago)
i've noticed pre-release streaming for a limited time to have really increased this year, across all genres and at all levels but the very top; that seems like a pretty good try-before-you-buy model. i wonder whether labels/artists might eventually do that, withhold new releases from spotify for a few months to a year, but put their back catalogues on it (in that the people who delve into an unheard artist's discography on spotify are unlikely to do so without spotify, much less buy the whole thing)
― lex pretend, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:18 (ten years ago)
labels should just pay the artists and then sell the rights to spotify based on the artist's worth. television seems to do ok with this model. the residuals from streams should increase, but those would never be the way an artist earns a living.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
oh wait, people still like old music and there's a lot of it. nvm.
the most disgusting thing about spotify is that it's made a deal with the music industry (which in most cases are just wings of larger multinational firms) where it gives up its catalog in exchange for equity, advances and dreams of a huge IPO. and when that happens, the labels hope to get shit tons of money that wouldn't then be filtered through the royalty system. this is why some artists have pulled their music, some of the bigger ones have accepted advances (maybe even equity) themselves. but labels and artists who are just along for the ride and taking what they can get need to realize that the end-goal of this ride is NOT to get good money to artists, but for shareholders to reap the whirlwind.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:21 (ten years ago)
yeah, that should be illegal
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:22 (ten years ago)
xp i would guess a more likely model would be "Spotify Premium" where you get access to select new releases and they cut a check to the major corporations (and taylors) of the world for more reasonable compensationgood pr move and would continue giving people what they want without having to answer the "yeah but can you make a living with spotify" question
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:22 (ten years ago)
or even more likely is a tiered system like that being the nature of whatever follows spotify
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:23 (ten years ago)
should specify i mean independent labels - those who provide their wares but haven't received equity in the company. to act like they're merely accepting a new distribution system is to give up on the one they can actually profit from
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:23 (ten years ago)
shit now i'm listening to smooth mcgroovehow do i turn this off
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:24 (ten years ago)
When you're entire music career is for the purpose of making lots and lots of money from people much poorer than you, you can see her point, though.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:27 (ten years ago)
RT let me introduce you... to smooth mcgroove
― Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:30 (ten years ago)
i'm going to be so disappointed if RT is really some bored old school ilxor who hasn't posted in a while. i like to imagine they've all just outgrown the place. for one to just come back and troll would be so sad.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:30 (ten years ago)
buh b'duh b'duhbuh buh buh b'duh b'duh d'bah bah bah
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:30 (ten years ago)
craving missingNO's $0.02 on this
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
raccoon tanuki has grown from a whimsically alienated acorn to an oak tree of hate /:
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
making lots and lots of money from people much poorer than you,
The highest form of art tbqh.
― Greer, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
croupier i think it's chris ott
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:32 (ten years ago)
man that guy is depressing enough, i don't need to throw this on the pile
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:33 (ten years ago)
i mean trolling pitchfork writers AND ilx god
calling yourself 'ilx god' is a bit much, sir
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:36 (ten years ago)
i would be pretty miserable too if i lived in the suburbs, had that eraserhead-ass hair and still couldn't get over these dumbass truth-to-power notions of sticking it to the man and exposing "hypocrisies" in pop culture media and music most of us were well the fuck aware of
and i do not put it past him to make up a british real hip-hop-head persona to continue trolling
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:41 (ten years ago)
but, bennies.
― Tim F, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:43 (ten years ago)
BENNIES BREH
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:44 (ten years ago)
trolling has its own bennies
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:44 (ten years ago)
man i just feel bad enough engaging earnestly as much as i do from my work desk. i'm in no position to throw stones about holding your former pop media peers to a ridiculously high standard but making an alias to disingenuously poke my fellow nerds with day jobs? yeesh. why not put on a wig and be a dick to wait staff at a restaurant.
― da croupier, Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:45 (ten years ago)
im sure he's considered it.
in the spirit of this thread's actual subject i'm gonna switch from arca to the tswift record to see if it's held up over a few weeks
― a dude eating another dude's leg in front of that dude (slothroprhymes), Thursday, 6 November 2014 20:54 (ten years ago)
More of my favourite moments from Taylor's Murdoch's Corporate Pravda Editorial from behind the paywall:
"It is my opinion that music should not be free"
"Music is art, and art is important and rare. Important, rare things are valuable. Valuable things should be paid for."
I also liked the part where she tried to compare the relation$hip with her music and her fan$ as a love story, and that something that special "shouldn't be free".
"Music should not be free"
What other forms of art should only be accessible to people who have the means to pay for them?
What Taylor doesn't get, because she's not an artist first, is that artists will make continue to make art regardless if someone's paying them for it or not. No artist makes art for money. That's exactly what art isn't. Art is free!!!!!!!!! Music is free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Enjoy your weekend!!!!!!!!!!!! Listen to loads of music that makes you feel good!!!!!!!! Stop thinking about money!!!!!! It doesn't even exist!!!!!!!! Space is only 20 miles away upwardly!!!!!!!
― Raccoon Tanuki, Friday, 7 November 2014 15:39 (ten years ago)
-_______________________________-
― dyl, Friday, 7 November 2014 15:57 (ten years ago)
omg "no artist makes art for money" are you a fucking low key crack addict hahahahahahahahahaha
even chris ott wouldn't say something that utterly naive, maybe my sock theory is off
(but he might troll with such statements, so, i'm still on the fence)
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Friday, 7 November 2014 16:07 (ten years ago)
i find it especially distasteful that she thinks music should be "rare" like fine art. music should be even easier to access than it already is, BUT artists absolutely need to be compensated far better by spotify and iTunes than they are now.
― ET sippin the wig (spazzmatazz), Friday, 7 November 2014 16:14 (ten years ago)
And ANOTHER THING... if the truth that she's a corporate shill who doesn't recognize her privilege pisses people off....
Swift doesn't seem to realise that she's a lucky one. She's incredibly lucky. Talent doesn't equal success. Artistic talent doesn't equal money. Art usually isn't worth money. Most artists are not rich. Most of the best artists in history have expired miraculously without a penny to their name. They didn't have a millionaire marketing and finance manager dad to help them along their way. Swift got where she is today mostly down to blind luck. Is she too obsessed with herself and her life to realise that? Making money at art has always been near impossible.
Ironically Spotify has the potential at least in the future, to change that. If only half of the 800 million itunes users went to Spotify, it's possible even niche acts could be self sustaining through it. Swift and her family surely know that Spotify is the future. Her presence on their of course could help it to generate the huge potential it has for other artists, in the future music world she talks about with her "agreed price points" editorial. She's in effect holding back the future, not embracing it like she claims.
RT out.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Friday, 7 November 2014 16:20 (ten years ago)
"who doesn't recognize her privilege pisses people off...."
Why can't she see this clearly true thing? What are we- mere rodents with thumbs to her?
― Evan, Friday, 7 November 2014 16:30 (ten years ago)
if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it, and it’s theirs now and they don’t have to pay for it.”
I'm sorry, this is incredibly stupid.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 7 November 2014 16:32 (ten years ago)
Not only stupid, but hilarious. Full new quote:
Also, a lot of people were suggesting to me that I try putting new music on Spotify with (last single) Shake It Off, and so I was open-minded about it. I thought, 'I will try this; I'll see how it feels'. It didn't feel right to me. I felt like I was saying to my fans, 'If you create music someday, if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it, and it's theirs now and they don't have to pay for it.' I didn't like the perception that it was putting forth. And so I decided to change the way I was doing things."
I love how she's using words like "try to be open-minded" when talking about ways she might make less money.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Friday, 7 November 2014 16:40 (ten years ago)
you forgot to say "RT out"
― da croupier, Friday, 7 November 2014 17:09 (ten years ago)
She's probably never had to hold a real job. You don't even need human sized thumbs to do that.
― Evan, Friday, 7 November 2014 17:11 (ten years ago)
RT back in
http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/ep_trending/public/photo/image/2012/04/01_rickrude_milestone_02.jpg
― Raccoon Tanuki, Friday, 7 November 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
Russia Today out.
― how's life, Friday, 7 November 2014 17:15 (ten years ago)
I think I love the "Blank space" voice memo as much as the album version.
― cpl593H, Friday, 7 November 2014 21:01 (ten years ago)
I don't know much about Taylor Swift but I am flattered
― joni mitchell jarre (dog latin), Saturday, 8 November 2014 01:55 (ten years ago)
X
Swift doesn't seem to realise that she's a lucky one.
She clearly wrote The Lucky One from RT's perspective a year in advance.
― Greer, Saturday, 8 November 2014 02:55 (ten years ago)
:D
― dyl, Saturday, 8 November 2014 05:27 (ten years ago)
I was driving today with a friend and "Blank Space" came on the radio, my first time hearing it. Sounds pretty good, I thought, it sounds like Britney. Yay. But then the guy I was driving with said, "that's the first time I've ever heard a Taylor Swift song!" and then I hated "Blank Space" for being such a crummy introduction.
― fgti, Saturday, 8 November 2014 09:51 (ten years ago)
Did he cry?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:06 (ten years ago)
hi i got paid and finally bought this album.
― horseshoe, Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:54 (ten years ago)
"style"!!!
first time i heard "style" i thought "this could be seamlessly covered by the 1975" and taylor just posted on her tumblr that the 1975 is her favorite band so hey that's neat
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:58 (ten years ago)
i avoided sharing that observation at the time bc this thread contains a few ppl who implode slightly when they think of matt healy's voice
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:59 (ten years ago)
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Saturday, 8 November 2014 15:59 (ten years ago)
Should we be listening to Liam Neesons?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 8 November 2014 16:15 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGXgDzl8aDM
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 8 November 2014 16:17 (ten years ago)
try listening to some real music maybe? just a thought
― fuhgeddaboudit! (missingNO), Saturday, 8 November 2014 16:56 (ten years ago)
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:58 (1 hour ago) Permalink
this is killing me in real time
matt better be wearing that t-shirt sincerely
― Tim F, Saturday, 8 November 2014 17:00 (ten years ago)
xpost "real" music, lololol are you fucking serious you posturing douchenozzle
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Saturday, 8 November 2014 20:49 (ten years ago)
Come on, don't be so easily trolled.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Saturday, 8 November 2014 20:51 (ten years ago)
I mean, that's what I figured, but to quote christoph waltz in django unchained, "I couldn't help it" tho I should know better
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Saturday, 8 November 2014 21:30 (ten years ago)
how amusing can it be to post the same trollbait over and over tho?
― dyl, Sunday, 9 November 2014 00:37 (ten years ago)
missingNO's work is subpar itt it is true
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 9 November 2014 02:53 (ten years ago)
just my $0.00 butter sauce
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 9 November 2014 02:54 (ten years ago)
u guyz http://gawker.com/here-is-a-much-better-music-video-for-taylor-swifts-sh-1655888619
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Sunday, 9 November 2014 03:27 (ten years ago)
I was just thinking the other day that big chunks of this album are like the 1975 done right.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 9 November 2014 09:43 (ten years ago)
the tempi don't even match, why do people even bother making this stuff
― Sharkie, Sunday, 9 November 2014 11:11 (ten years ago)
omg she just Beyonce'd the "Blank Space" video in the middle of the night
https://screen.yahoo.com/videos-musicales-taylor-swift/blank-space-001424201.html?soc_src=default
It's so great too, I don't hate the "Shake It Off" video as much as others do but this is still so much better
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Monday, 10 November 2014 09:05 (ten years ago)
"Sorry! The content provider has not given us the rights to play this video in your location."
:_;
― Tim F, Monday, 10 November 2014 09:09 (ten years ago)
Try this? https://screen.yahoo.com/vevo-taylor-swift/blank-space-001424201.html
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Monday, 10 November 2014 09:10 (ten years ago)
Nope, same problem.
I assume this whole "give it to yahoo first" gambit is phase two in taylor's convoluted plan to shut down the internet.
― Tim F, Monday, 10 November 2014 09:11 (ten years ago)
This is probably her best video yet.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Monday, 10 November 2014 09:13 (ten years ago)
haha yeah that's great
this album is pretty much my entire consciousness these days
― droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 10 November 2014 09:46 (ten years ago)
female bluebeard huh! yes, good video for once
― lex pretend, Monday, 10 November 2014 09:56 (ten years ago)
That doe tho
― 龜, Monday, 10 November 2014 12:31 (ten years ago)
Okay seen it now. So good!
― Tim F, Monday, 10 November 2014 13:02 (ten years ago)
kinda hilarious to play this back to back with the "mine" video clip.
― Tim F, Monday, 10 November 2014 13:24 (ten years ago)
thought "love story" was the one it was most nodding at
taylor's taste in video boys remains top notch
― lex pretend, Monday, 10 November 2014 13:32 (ten years ago)
my one quibble is out of the 1989-born supermodels to choose from she picked o'pry over nessman
― prolego, Monday, 10 November 2014 14:04 (ten years ago)
found a working video here: http://vimeo.com/111398079
absolutely a great video. love the little dance she does with the axe while hitting the tree.
but is dropping something without a huge campaign necessarily Beyonce-ing it? i mean. its a video -- it _is_ a campaign. if i get lunch but don't tell you i'm getting lunch, am i beyonceing my lunch
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Monday, 10 November 2014 14:30 (ten years ago)
none of the links above are working, obvs taylor is like "YOOOO I GOT THE INTERNET SHOOK RN"http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2014/11/10/tay/tay8.o.jpg/a_560x375.jpg
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Monday, 10 November 2014 15:04 (ten years ago)
Her producers and writers are very good at regurgitating bubble pop tropes, but she still can't sing. Even autotuned to 11 it's still just unpleasant and shrill.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 10 November 2014 15:19 (ten years ago)
how bout that
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 November 2014 15:43 (ten years ago)
now we're getting to a subject you know intimately
racoon vs 2 cents guy: fite?
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Monday, 10 November 2014 15:45 (ten years ago)
not seen the vid yet, lol at yahoo cocking this up, but i did see this still:
http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu216/le_bateau_ivre/B2FmVl2IYAIi3xJ.jpg
yowsa
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Monday, 10 November 2014 15:48 (ten years ago)
xpost BATTLE - 2 TROLLS ENTER, 1 TROLL LEAVES
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Monday, 10 November 2014 15:51 (ten years ago)
has taylor ever made a good video? is "you belong with me" the closest one?
― J0rdan S., Monday, 10 November 2014 16:11 (ten years ago)
The one w/ the sign in the bedroom window was pretty good at least for htat meme
― 龜, Monday, 10 November 2014 16:12 (ten years ago)
"you belong with me" is prob her best so far yes
smh i can't find a working link for this one D:
― dyl, Monday, 10 November 2014 16:15 (ten years ago)
I saw it before it was taken down I'd be willing to call any one in this thread and give them a scene by scene retelling from memory
― 龜, Monday, 10 November 2014 16:19 (ten years ago)
rip 龜
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 November 2014 16:24 (ten years ago)
michael hann attempts to out-clickhole clickhole, having his clickbait cake and sending it up too?
http://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2014/nov/10/how-taylor-swifts-blank-space-video-redefines-politics-music-and-everything-else-ever
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 10 November 2014 16:29 (ten years ago)
ok i saw it (there was another vimeo link). it's just ok?
― dyl, Monday, 10 November 2014 16:33 (ten years ago)
Look, she stands on a horse. A horse!
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Monday, 10 November 2014 16:41 (ten years ago)
there were a lot of outfits
― call all destroyer, Monday, 10 November 2014 16:42 (ten years ago)
On VEVO now apparently
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-ORhEE9VVg
― 龜, Monday, 10 November 2014 17:43 (ten years ago)
lorde's album is still on spotify. taylorde's lawyers better get on that.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 November 2014 17:50 (ten years ago)
i am actually a big fan of "ours" despite its ending
"22" also fine
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Monday, 10 November 2014 17:55 (ten years ago)
her videos usually blatantly suck or are completely whatever so this is def a big step up, i'm lolin through it
kinda wish she'd really go for it and get legitimately stabby, like full on american psycho to the dude, but the kidz would be traumatized and the middle ameriKKKan parents would declare a fatwa on tay
― ichabron crames (slothroprhymes), Monday, 10 November 2014 17:57 (ten years ago)
New Taylor Swift Video Asks: What If Beyoncé Were White And Insane?
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Monday, 10 November 2014 18:57 (ten years ago)
It may have been a of send-up of her previous videos (the stairs and the running in long dress from Love Story, the white horses from White Horse, the bicycles from Begin Again, etc)
― cpl593H, Monday, 10 November 2014 19:05 (ten years ago)
She's the 1% spokesperson at this point. #OccupySwift
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 10 November 2014 21:02 (ten years ago)
Riding on bikes through the mansion = nice nod to the Still Into You video
― Sharkie, Monday, 10 November 2014 21:41 (ten years ago)
truly the age where the only comparisons that can possibly be made are to mega-famous artists, i have seen so many taylor vs beyoncé arguments of late when they're just...not even in the same lane and have so little to do with each other
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 13:19 (ten years ago)
xpost to Tracer Hand … Fair cop. The backbench decided we had to have some kind of thinkpiece. But I'm sick of lazy TS thinkpieces that burden her with the responsibility for saving feminism and changing the world. Disturbed so many people thought it was serious.
― Unsettled defender (ithappens), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:02 (ten years ago)
i don't think it's unfair to bring up beyonce (she didn't invent perfume ad mansion shit, but she's been owning it) but shock of shocks at gawker taking the most self-righteous, baiting angle possible
"torture/warn ya"? what is is about taylor and bridges right now
― da croupier, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:36 (ten years ago)
of every other artist around, they couldn't find a more pertinent comparison than beyoncé?
the critical conversation increasingly revolves in endless circles around, like, five megafamous names
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:43 (ten years ago)
Why are there animals walking around in her giant mansion? Is that a Bunuel reference?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
Disturbed so many people thought it was serious.
ha! :o
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:47 (ten years ago)
the complaints about the gawker thing lack context, which is that the author is known for among other things writing about everything as it relates to beyonce. and lately she has also been giving good coverage to taylor swift. so this is sort of inevitable. (because both are famous, gawker has, i'll grant, also had lots of other ppl covering both, but still not covering like *this*)
http://gawker.com/how-to-sneak-into-1000-seats-at-a-beyonce-concert-a-g-1034118397http://gawker.com/broken-beyonce-malfunctions-warranty-invalid-due-to-us-1654604969http://gawker.com/5980642/beyonce-just-held-a-press-conference-so-that-she-could-sing-the-national-anthem-live-for-everyonehttp://gawker.com/looks-like-beyonce-and-blue-celebrated-take-your-daught-1538699697http://gawker.com/taylor-swift-nnnnnnnnnnn-annnnnnnnnnnnnngaaaaaaaaa-1652305203http://gawker.com/where-does-she-take-the-cat-1638092341http://gawker.com/taylor-swift-handed-a-girl-90-out-of-her-purse-to-go-t-1615992654
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 18:16 (ten years ago)
it's also a different/funny angle on a video that every website on earth is posting
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 November 2014 18:23 (ten years ago)
Yup.
Unrelated: I feel like I need to do a radio edit of Carl Wilson's Slate essay because there are some wonderful lines and observations but in its entirety it makes me want to punch a wall.
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
lol i kind of agree
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:32 (ten years ago)
I couldn't finish it. It was like being forced to eat the same too rich meal several times while being strapped to my chair.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:33 (ten years ago)
welcome to the era of getting traffic at any cost
― maura, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
This paragraph was my GTFO moment.
A “nightmare dressed like a daydream”—but what kind of nightmare? Given 1989’s title, perhaps it is Stephen Dedalus’ nightmare: history, from which he is trying to awake. Perhaps it is the actual history of 1989—the year, after all, of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the showdown in Tiananmen Square, the year of the “End of History,” the twilight of the Cold War, the dawn of neoliberal triumphalism. The year of “Like a Prayer.”
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
Is this the same as or different to that guardian piece about how the blank space video has changed culture forever.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:34 (ten years ago)
theory: taylor swift named her album after the joshua clover book http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520267879
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:46 (ten years ago)
someone should interview him and ask how he feels about having an album named after his book.
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:48 (ten years ago)
what does that have to do with beyoncé
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:53 (ten years ago)
should be easy to tie it to I Am...Sasha Frere
― da croupier, Tuesday, 11 November 2014 20:55 (ten years ago)
walking back half cut to my hotel late last night - listening to Style was *magnificent*. empty streets of parisian hinterland may even have seen a little dancing.
― Fizzles, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 07:43 (ten years ago)
the other weekend heading out on a saturday night i was mostly looking forward to my first drunk journey home listen to this
it was everything i dreamed of & more
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 09:40 (ten years ago)
xp You know the Guardian piece was a parody, right? Or was there another one?
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 11:23 (ten years ago)
^^^ new board description
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 12 November 2014 11:44 (ten years ago)
is it a challop to say that I think the Tove Lo album is exponentially better than this one? they're in the same lane; don't think it's a false equivalency.like this feels as good as most of the best of 1989 and it's not even the best track on the albumhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sQ5-PBaE3k
― So beautiful cow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:47 (ten years ago)
hey this is just like when someone tried to convince me "cool kids" is better than this album
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:56 (ten years ago)
like what you like dude. i'm a bit disappointed in 1989.
― So beautiful cow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:58 (ten years ago)
i like some tove lo songs okay! the chorus in the one you posted is just doing nothing at all
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 14 November 2014 20:59 (ten years ago)
also even though it's sparer than her past records taylor's lyrical perspective still seems way more clarified than a lot of stuff that exists in this soundworld
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
Tove's stuff has been slow burner for me in the same way that Taylor's first three albums were; eventually they go from meh to interesting to me getting hooked on them. 'Got Love' sounds like a lot of what TS was trying to do on 1989 that didn't click to my ears.
― So beautiful cow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:01 (ten years ago)
i def think taylor is a better lyricist, but there's something in the songwriting that sounds a little too derivative and tryhard on all the pop singlesstill love out of the woods tho'
― So beautiful cow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:04 (ten years ago)
i hear more Suicide in taylor than tove
― a total laugh package (s.clover), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:06 (ten years ago)
waht
― example (crüt), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:07 (ten years ago)
we can get through this together
― So beautiful cow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 14 November 2014 21:08 (ten years ago)
guys, guys, the call of death can be heard in both
― da croupier, Friday, 14 November 2014 22:25 (ten years ago)
Suicide the band, not the, uh, concept.
― a total laugh package (s.clover), Friday, 14 November 2014 23:45 (ten years ago)
Yeah, we got that. Still...waht
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 14 November 2014 23:47 (ten years ago)
I just woke up singing blank space. This song, it's invading my brain. I love it so much.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Saturday, 15 November 2014 12:13 (ten years ago)
i've only had this for a couple of days and it didn't click for me at first but now.......'style'
― out here like a flopson (tpp), Friday, 21 November 2014 07:20 (ten years ago)
OMG TAYLOR / SELENA / 1975 OMG
http://instagram.com/p/vp94SUjvGd/
― Tim F, Friday, 21 November 2014 09:34 (ten years ago)
the universe just exploded omg
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Friday, 21 November 2014 09:42 (ten years ago)
Haha just saw it and came here to post it, I always knew Taylor would find the corny complexity of the 1975 appealing.
― cpl593H, Friday, 21 November 2014 11:35 (ten years ago)
i'm in floods of tears
― uberweiss, Friday, 21 November 2014 11:57 (ten years ago)
i saw it on my commute home from work on Instagram and yelped out loud
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Friday, 21 November 2014 12:35 (ten years ago)
is that sound between "i've got a blank space baby" and "i'll write your name" in "blank space" the sound of a mouseclick?
― slam dunk, Friday, 21 November 2014 13:20 (ten years ago)
Always assumed she was clicking down the point of a ballpoint pen.
― Tim F, Friday, 21 November 2014 20:54 (ten years ago)
def
it was an excellent decision for her to make the sound herself
― r|t|c, Friday, 21 November 2014 21:11 (ten years ago)
altho now i'm kinda thinking perhaps it's a shame the vid didn't have her doing a wink and a gun after every chorus
― r|t|c, Friday, 21 November 2014 21:15 (ten years ago)
huh http://www.newappsblog.com/2014/11/taylor-swifts-platonism.html
― a total laugh package (s.clover), Saturday, 22 November 2014 02:24 (ten years ago)
Chvrches covering blank space is my current wet dream. Who's with me?
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Saturday, 22 November 2014 08:31 (ten years ago)
1989 ranked
stylei know placesout of the woodsblank spacenew romanticscleanwildest dreamsall you had to do was staythis lovei wish you wouldyou are in lovehow you get the girlwonderlandbad bloodshake it offwelcome to new york
― lex pretend, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:44 (ten years ago)
wow at "i know places" so high and "you are in love" so low
― Tim F, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:48 (ten years ago)
more like:
styleblank spaceyou are in lovei wish you wouldout of the woodswildest dreamsnew romanticscleanall you had to do was staythis lovehow you get the girlshake it offi know placeswonderlandbad bloodwelcome to new york
― Tim F, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:52 (ten years ago)
i think "i know places" is immense but no one either on or off ilx seems to rate it at all, which baffles me
"you are in love" is nice but kinda slight to me, especially compared to the ballads that made it on to the main album. i'm trying to work out a good defence of "wildest dreams" despite it being completely shameless LDR cosplay and i think it's the middle eight
― lex pretend, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:53 (ten years ago)
styleyou are in loveout of the woodsblank spacethis lovei wish you wouldall you had to do was stayhow you get the girlnew romanticsshake it offcleanwildest dreamsbad bloodwelcome to new yorki know placeswonderland
― bunny slopes, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:55 (ten years ago)
it's quite strange how the production on this album veers from song to song, and sometimes even within the same song, from being totally revelatory and wondrous to almost fatally crippling the songs
― lex pretend, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:59 (ten years ago)
like, the sound design on "style and "this love" and "clean" is just incredible, but there's this tinniness elsewhere, even on "blank space", that's like an itch, and some of the electronic touches are a bit ill-advised
― lex pretend, Saturday, 22 November 2014 20:01 (ten years ago)
new romanticsyou are in lovestylei wish you wouldout of the woodsall you had to do was stayhow you get the girlblank spacecleanthis loveshake it offwelcome to new yorkbad bloodwonderlandi know places
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 22 November 2014 20:10 (ten years ago)
u left out wildest dreams
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 22 November 2014 20:16 (ten years ago)
knew i forgot something. uh that's between "blank space" and "clean"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 22 November 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
well if we're playing this already
styleblank spacecleanout of the woodsthis loveNew RomanticsShake it offHow you get the girlI know placesall you had to do was stayi wish you wouldwildest dreamsyou are in lovewelcome to New Yorkwonderlandbad blood
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 22 November 2014 20:53 (ten years ago)
"Blank Space" is my favorite Swift single since "Mean," and I've grown to love it thanks to airplay.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 22 November 2014 21:57 (ten years ago)
Bonus tracks: "You Are In Love" > "New Romantics"
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Saturday, 22 November 2014 22:02 (ten years ago)
i mean they switch places in my head every other day
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 22 November 2014 22:12 (ten years ago)
but in the playlist of this album i made with "new romantics" as track one, every time i hear it i'm like "oh this is the best song in the world"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Saturday, 22 November 2014 22:13 (ten years ago)
"i wish you would" is my jam off this one, i wonder if haim feels like taylor ethered their entire existence
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 23 November 2014 03:35 (ten years ago)
Hey, she finally knocked Meghan Trainor out of #1.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 23 November 2014 04:26 (ten years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3FqzdVIcAEkPT2.jpg
― uberweiss, Sunday, 23 November 2014 06:21 (ten years ago)
also i can't take the "bad blood" panning, as much as i understand it
SO IF YOU'RE COMING MY WAY - JUST DON'T
― uberweiss, Sunday, 23 November 2014 06:22 (ten years ago)
it is the worst song on the album by far, it is so bad that i find myself believing the conspiracy theories about her 'beef' with katy perry having been completely made up for publicity
― dyl, Sunday, 23 November 2014 07:22 (ten years ago)
i can't fathom thinking bad blood is the worst when there's "welcome to new york" on here
― uxorious gazumping (monotony), Sunday, 23 November 2014 07:57 (ten years ago)
I love how people's rankings basically have the same five songs in a different order at the bottom.
Also YES @ Taylor in 1975 t-shirt.
― Tim F, Sunday, 23 November 2014 09:35 (ten years ago)
i'm trying to work out a good defence of "wildest dreams" despite it being completely shameless LDR cosplay and i think it's the middle eight
― lex pretend, Saturday, 22 November 2014 19:53 Bookmark
imo "say you'll see me again - even if it's just pretend" (and the hanging moment afterwards) feels like the key bit... besides hitting a crucially different, ambiguously rueful focusing note on the wildest dreams chorus it can maybe also be heard as acknowledging the cosplay and in meta turn the essential appeal of ldr herself as cosplay vehicle too
per jordan i guess that can fit into that possible subtext of her on a gggb rampage subtly ethering peers with an innocent smile
the middle 8 is very good tho... "you see me in hindsight / tangled up with you all night / burnin. it. down" is a rush
― r|t|c, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:01 (ten years ago)
ha ha 'i know places' seems an archetypically lexy torturous countrygoth singer songwriter jam... not unlike johnny fever running in all like omg 'stay' has two seconds that sound like scissor sisters or w/e
i wouldn't mind it otherwise but the fox n hounds thing is v done v yawn
― r|t|c, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:21 (ten years ago)
it's quite strange how the production on this album veers from song to song, and sometimes even within the same song, from being totally revelatory and wondrous to almost fatally crippling the songs... but there's this tinniness elsewhere, even on "blank space", that's like an itch, and some of the electronic touches are a bit ill-advised
Haha I got the Anna Wintour stern face from Tim upthread for suggesting some of the songs sounded cheap.
We put this album on post-pub last night and Wildest Dreams was accompanied by a lengthy discussion of the phrase "nice dress" in the chorus, in that "nice" is such a blandly undescriptive adjective that writers are always told not to use, but in this context that's what gives the song that extra bit of emotional edge, like "a nice dress" is so unassuming! Lana Del Rey's dress would definitely be *red*. And also LDR would croon the song in such a way that kills its emotional resonance stone dead.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:23 (ten years ago)
she already had the red lips, can't be too matchy matchy
― r|t|c, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:28 (ten years ago)
naw i got stern face b/c you were hating on "style".
"blank space" does sound cheap but it's kinda meant to, it's not a mistake imo.
― Tim F, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:34 (ten years ago)
"nice dress" goes to the vagueness of the false memory taylor's trying to incept in her boy's brain, I think.
― Tim F, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:35 (ten years ago)
If we're going to do this:
Out Of The WoodsI Wish You WouldAll You Had To Do Was StayBlank SpaceNew RomanticsHow You Get The GirlStyleWildest DreamsShake It OffCleanI Know PlacesCleanThis LoveWonderlandWelcome To New YorkBad Blood
― Matt DC, Sunday, 23 November 2014 10:59 (ten years ago)
I promoted 'Clean' by a few places and forgot to delete it. I can't remember what 'You Are In Love' sounds like at all.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 23 November 2014 11:00 (ten years ago)
StyleNew romanticsBlank spaceOut of the woodsCleanI wish you would All you had to do was stayYou are in loveWildest dreamsThis loveI know placesHow you get the girlBad bloodWonderlandWelcome to new yorkShake it off
― Nourry, Sunday, 23 November 2014 18:01 (ten years ago)
stylenew romanticsi wish you wouldblank spacecleanall you had to do was stayyou are in loveout of the woodshow you get the girlthis lovewildest dreamsi know placeswonderlandshake it offbad bloodwelcome to new york
― prolego, Sunday, 23 November 2014 18:33 (ten years ago)
not sure where this feeling came from but i don't want to think about taylor swift anymore for a good long while
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 23 November 2014 18:53 (ten years ago)
The phrase "in your wildest dreams" generally has such a connotation of bitterness, this fantasy that you'd be foolish to entertain, but she repurposes it with a sort of tender ambiguity by prefacing it with "say you'll see me again, even if it's just..." So while it stylistically recalls LDR it also hits that same tone that she accomplished in "Tim McGraw" for me: Say you'll see me again, I hope you think of me, I'll bet these memories follow you around. In your wildest dreams: you're the one who will be pining, because I've moved on.
It drives me crazy, and her vocals on it are just A+
― billy, Sunday, 23 November 2014 19:00 (ten years ago)
yes!
the phrase "see me in hindsight" reminds me of how she adjusts that rearview mirror at the end of "white horse"
― lex pretend, Sunday, 23 November 2014 19:30 (ten years ago)
ha ha 'i know places' seems an archetypically lexy torturous countrygoth singer songwriter jam...
i cop 2 this but i am not usually so alone on my countrygoth path
yeah but it still means that as catchy and witty as it is, there are already diminishing returns of poprush (not that that necessarily puts it below, say, "i wish you would", which has obvious poprush for days but feels a bit too much of a stylistic exercise to be top-tier t-swift) (though "wildest dreams" is the most stylistic exercise thing of all and that's totally exempt obv)
― lex pretend, Sunday, 23 November 2014 19:34 (ten years ago)
Yeah the bridge on "Wildest Dreams" is one of biggest moments on the album for me, especially the crispness of how she says "it" in "Burnin'. It. Down", and the backing vocals on the second run-through.
― Tim F, Sunday, 23 November 2014 22:04 (ten years ago)
this album makes really frequent use of the full (false?) stop. not sure exactly the lineage of that, but its v. effective
― celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Monday, 24 November 2014 01:43 (ten years ago)
Songs I've heard, everything has been done, and done better, derivative and homogenous. Can't sing, autotuned to shit, awkward, stilted lyrics, cliched dated pop production. "I'm a nightmare dressed like a day dream" is so bad as is "love's a game, wanna play?" "'Cause you know I love the playersAnd you love the game"
maybe she'd have been better just leaving a blank space instead of singing these lyrics, which are like a bad imitation of the worst bubble pop lyrics from 15 years ago
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 24 November 2014 13:18 (ten years ago)
you have to laugh at grown men sitting around getting angry over taylor swift
― prolego, Monday, 24 November 2014 13:21 (ten years ago)
and listening to her
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 24 November 2014 13:30 (ten years ago)
Bubble Pop! was released in 2011, only 3 years ago, not 15. I know it feels like we've had it forever.
― celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Monday, 24 November 2014 15:36 (ten years ago)
*smh*
― Basically / I Don't Wanna Be / An mp3 / 3-2-0 kb / ps (Craigo Boingo), Monday, 24 November 2014 17:17 (ten years ago)
talked to my parents last nite and they told me out of the blue about how much they love this "blank space" song/video by a person called taylor swift that they recently learned about (they are the types w/ no tabs on pop culture at all)
― dyl, Monday, 24 November 2014 20:00 (ten years ago)
eh blank space is good but it'd be even better if it were the wu tang clan
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 24 November 2014 21:44 (ten years ago)
swift notarizer
― r|t|c, Monday, 24 November 2014 21:49 (ten years ago)
also i mean it's buzzfeed but lol anyway http://www.buzzfeed.com/joannaborns/blank-space-starbucks-lovers
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 24 November 2014 21:58 (ten years ago)
"I love the players / and you love th game" is pretty good, though not as good as "we were young; you were reckless" (which recalls s. merritt's "I was young / you were dumb", and is mb a slight improvement.) the other two fall into the crack between her persona and her craft.
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 24 November 2014 21:59 (ten years ago)
blank spaces worst failure was leaving that horrible appendix of an acoustic guitar in there, albeit that never stopped people listening to the rise and fall of ziggy stardust and the spiders from mars
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 24 November 2014 22:02 (ten years ago)
merritt's has the advantage of the followup couplet "now you're older and i'm wiser"
while writing that, i just enjambed taylor and merritt together and almost wrote Tift Merritt, which maybe means nothing at all
― celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Monday, 24 November 2014 23:09 (ten years ago)
i could see him writing for twifty tbh
― linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 24 November 2014 23:18 (ten years ago)
I forgot all about Tift Merritt, I liked that one album. Where have you gone, alt-country hopes of days past?
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 00:53 (ten years ago)
Regarding the blank space AMA performance, I can't distinguish her voice from the backing singers.
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 01:06 (ten years ago)
http://www.stereogum.com/1721414/joni-mitchell-squashed-biopic-starring-taylor-swift/news/
― put your money where the maracas are (how's life), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 16:42 (ten years ago)
http://www.complex.com/music/2014/11/prince-deleted-his-social-media-accounts-and-removed-his-music-from-youtubetaytay's op-ed must've really struck a chord as another domino falls
― hanley ramirez ordering a pizza (slothroprhymes), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 19:13 (ten years ago)
This is a weird thing for Prince to do.
― Tay-Tay Brooklynpants (Murgatroid), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 19:15 (ten years ago)
the next step is changing his name
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 November 2014 19:17 (ten years ago)
I haven't read any of this thread and I only just really listened to this album for the first time a few days ago, and it's pretty good, I just came here to note:
The beat on "I Wish You Would" is really fucking weird and awesome! It reminds me of Curve or Mouse On Mars or some early 90's Warp Records shit
― fgti jaq, it's chinavision! (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 26 November 2014 17:01 (ten years ago)
mainly that track reminds me of savage garden
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 27 November 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
College freshman at our thanksgiving gathering today told me blank space was about the paparazzi??
― 龜, Thursday, 27 November 2014 21:10 (ten years ago)
Yo is it true that paparazzi got sonned by a white pop star after unspecified beef???
― Tim F, Thursday, 27 November 2014 21:52 (ten years ago)
i just assume "i know places" is about the paparazzi
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 28 November 2014 23:01 (ten years ago)
I love her and this album, but this Is pretty sad http://www.mtv.com/videos/news/1094483/taylor-swift-discusses-evil-pop-vs-smart-pop.jhtml
― Nourry, Monday, 1 December 2014 02:44 (ten years ago)
"We wanted to keep this pop clean and good and right," says Taylor Swift about her 1989 album.
a blank space you might say
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 December 2014 02:52 (ten years ago)
her examples of non-evil pop are fun. and lorde
― Face facts poptimism hacks, your a scam. (forksclovetofu), Monday, 1 December 2014 05:58 (ten years ago)
Well, Swift has never been really good as a curator, really. Back in the Speak Now tour, when she did cover versions, her picks were either absolute crap or the most obvious thing. But then she did deliver great cover versions out of those choices, and she usually manages to grab crap influences such as Snow Patrol, filter them through her own sensibilities, and create something good out of them. So I suppose I wouldn't put a lot of expectations into her musical tastes, and I appreciate they don't ruin her output.
― cpl593H, Monday, 1 December 2014 12:13 (ten years ago)
"Taylor Swift Discusses 'Evil Pop' Vs 'Smart Pop'"
I'll be in the corner of this thread laughing from now on.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Monday, 1 December 2014 13:05 (ten years ago)
My list:
You are in loveCleanI wish you wouldBlank SpaceI Know PlacesAll You Had to do was stayOut of the woodsStyleWildest dreamsHow you get the girlWelcome to New YorkThis loveNew romanticsShake it offWonderland
― cpl593H, Monday, 1 December 2014 20:39 (ten years ago)
Every time "You Are In Love" plays in my head I hear Taylor singing "... and he keeps a spreadsheet of you in his office downtown" and I creep myself out a bit.
― Tim F, Monday, 1 December 2014 22:01 (ten years ago)
Taylor x jaymc
― 龜, Monday, 1 December 2014 22:05 (ten years ago)
the last line of this strikes me as incisive http://thetruthaboutcatsanddogs.tumblr.com/post/104172463368/1989
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:15 (ten years ago)
it's probably too challopsy (and too late) to take issue with characterizing taylor's music as diaristic, right
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:19 (ten years ago)
i mean it's a value she invests her own music with so i'm probably just looking for an argument
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:20 (ten years ago)
i've argued w/alfred about how totally he rejects biographical readings but i feel like the whole world goes way too far the other way with t-swift, even if she 100% incites it herself. i've never felt that her work was straight-up diaristic, but 1989 being like a pinterest board does ring true
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:23 (ten years ago)
it feels like the right album for her to have made at this juncture, once again, but it's also the first that i've never once felt might be her best yet
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:25 (ten years ago)
haha I was about to jump in but my bodyguard is holding me back
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:25 (ten years ago)
btw I don't reject biography when used as color in a narrative; I have a problem when it's used as explanation or defense.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:26 (ten years ago)
more generally it does make me wonder what critics think the process of creating art actually involves. sitting down one day and out of one sole thought about one sole event, a song emerges fully-formed?
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:26 (ten years ago)
what does it even mean for a song to be "about" something
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:27 (ten years ago)
itt lex has deep thoughts
― 龜, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:28 (ten years ago)
you think those are deep thoughts????
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:29 (ten years ago)
^^^ that's why I'm skeptical, as a man who's written fiction and songs. In my experience, writing begins often with a scene or a few lines or character bits that may come from lived or observed experience. Much of the result consist of synthesizing these bits into patterns I don't expect. But Taylor Swift is the scion of wealth who can pull her catalog off Spotify, not me.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:31 (ten years ago)
i guess if i were to associated "like reading a diary" with any of her records it wouldn't be red
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 19:35 (ten years ago)
associate*
i don't necessarily think the pinterest idea is a bad thing btw -- maybe "i wish you would" is taylor pinning haim to her board (lol) but it's one of the best things on the album
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:14 (ten years ago)
but it seemed like we were all in agreement that though this album is great it doesn't necessarily stack up to her previous albums primarily because lyrically she took a different aim?
i don't think it's a bad thing either, it just doesn't match my experience of the record, but i don't have a replacement analogy
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:15 (ten years ago)
i think this record and red are her best for different reasons but take into account i fussed with the tracklistings of both
yeah this is like, beyonce '4' level of "you must totally alter this tracklist in order for this album to realize it's world beating potential"
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:16 (ten years ago)
i also think the lyrical direction works for these specific songs. they simpler, sparer, more direct and it's kind of refreshing? they're as much about the impact as the content, e.g. the bridge of "i wish you would"
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:18 (ten years ago)
That's an excellent analogy. I can't defend this album as a whole but when the tracks I love play it's her best.
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:18 (ten years ago)
re: her other albums, relistening to speak now before this record came out i found it to be a cascade of great songs that really exhaust me in sequence, which is why i love how varied red is even though it's just as long. fearless feels like a different artist at this point
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:20 (ten years ago)
As for altering tracklist I just switched out two tracks with bonus tracks and it's one of my most listened to TS albums so far looking at their first month in rotation. Better than Speak Now, is the only real conclusion so far.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:22 (ten years ago)
The only TS album I've ever thought is her best is Fearless.
speak now is underrated imo -- def feels like a stagnant album in light of red & 1989 but there are a bunch of great songs on that
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:23 (ten years ago)
It's still my favorite as an album (my #1 of '10 iirc)
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
that's why I'm skeptical
What does that make you skeptical about? The fact that her songwriting may not be as "diaristic" as it's usually assumed it is?
The first time I saw someone saying Swift's style was "diaristic" was in X-Gau's review of "Fearless"; I believe that predates her overexposure in the media and the attempts of linking every song she writes to her occasional partners. I think it was related to the topics she used to write about and her aesthetic choices, rather than her songwriting process, which, up to "Speak Now", I would have categorized as more observational than anything else. She started shedding that to a degree in Red, and there's a lot less of that in 1989.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:26 (ten years ago)
it's definitely her most consistent
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:28 (ten years ago)
speak now > fearless > s/t > 1989 > red
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:29 (ten years ago)
that's the way i see it too
― a stupid red mute juggalo (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:30 (ten years ago)
i might switch fearless and speak now
― a stupid red mute juggalo (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
let's not do this
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:31 (ten years ago)
is taylor on the ballot poll list? i feel like that one would be legit interesting
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:32 (ten years ago)
"Speak Now" is still my favorite too. It's not as huge a leap as Fearless was from S/T, but she refined that particular style and added many unexpected layers of complexity. Lyrically, she's been gradually shedding that complexity, though both Red and 1989 still have moments that make me confident she's not lost it. (You are in love, Begin Again, All Too Well)
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:36 (ten years ago)
I really can't rank them. I think i have a more intense reaction with each release because my r'ship to taylor as an artist is accumulative, but otherwise all except her debut feel on a level for me (I basically treat the debut like an amazing EP now).
― Tim F, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:38 (ten years ago)
4 is almost perfectly sequenced imo? frontloading the ballads is key to its amazingness. i don't think 1989 needs resequencing either, just judicious deletion. only little red in recent pop memory really required resequencing.
I think i have a more intense reaction with each release because my r'ship to taylor as an artist is accumulative
this is totally true of me but what i'm saying is that this is the first album where that pattern of ever-increasing accumulation has...stopped, in a way
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 20:56 (ten years ago)
re 4 i guess i just mean in terms of deleting the two bad songs and replacing them with the two amazing bonus tracks
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
She could be added for a poll to take place in approx 4 years.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:00 (ten years ago)
I think i have a more intense reaction with each release
Yes. Each new release stretches in some new direction, while drawing from previous releases and feeding back into them. I'm not sure I can pinpoint why, but if I listen to more recent songs such as "Clean" or "Begin Again", and then go back to "Dear John", I get the feeling it makes even more sense now than back in 2010. I don't think she's carefully plotting this, but IMHO she's building a real body of work.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:02 (ten years ago)
each new taylor album almost makes her previous feel like juvenilia - not in a bad way, but they feel like perfect encapsulations of who you/she used to be and that necessarily means you/she can never be that person again. which means it's particularly hard to assess them purely qualitatively against each other. but while 1989 seems to cleave to that pattern it does so in a sort of...obvious way, in that as much as i love it i feel like i can be detached from it in a way i wasn't with the three previous
speak now > fearless > red > taylor swift > 1989
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 09:47 (ten years ago)
I'd agree with that characterisation of the dynamic. I'm curious though about your weaker connection to the new album: do you feel it's founded on the bad tracks, or on the better tracks being not as impacting, or both?
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:04 (ten years ago)
both, but actually more the latter - i've judiciously ignored bad tracks throughout taylor's career, though they've never been this bad. but my need-to-play-incessantly impulse isn't as strong and hasn't lasted as long with this album, the production on the uptempo tracks is mostly something to endure (and i think her voice is produced badly too, or at least she sounds shriller than she's ever done in places), in even some of the better songs i i like them more because they're catchy than because they give me feelings ("i wish you would" and "all you had to do was stay" exemplify this for me - i enjoy them a lot but i don't think i FEEL them).
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:18 (ten years ago)
i think when it comes down to it there are maybe only two tracks i think are completely flawless on this album (and one of those is one literally no one else likes)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:20 (ten years ago)
flaws i can't stop thinking about
"out of the woods" - horrid electronic squiggles right at the climax"all you had to do was stay" - tinny production generally"i wish you would" - superior haim-esque pastiche but still haim-esque pastiche that's too in thrall to another decade"new romantics" - makes me think of being stuck at a house party with lena dunham :( it's a bit like an indie "22""this love" - sounds beautiful but the chorus lyrics are just placeholders"you are in love" - so slight and the verse melody mostly annoys me
and these are the songs i LIKE
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:25 (ten years ago)
I ask because if I stop and think about it I feel like I maybe agree with you on some objective level where I try to decide whether "I Wish You Would" is as good as "Holy Ground" and conclude it is not ("Style" vs "Treacherous" is harder, though the latter will probably hold onto its Greatest Ever Tay crown for me) - but then I've been listening to this album I feel as obsessively as I did with Red. Though maybe that's because the steepening engagement makes up for any quality shortfall (though I suspect the latter is pretty minor for me).
Helps that 2014 is probably a weaker year for albums otherwise.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:28 (ten years ago)
haha I don't think I agree with any of those criticisms...
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:29 (ten years ago)
"new romantics" is obv about selena gomez anyway.
Re: biographical readings, I can't think of another songwriter who's so keen to let us know that certain songs are about certain events and certain people and then refuse to divulge the names. This line of Lex's is pretty much what she claims: "sitting down one day and out of one sole thought about one sole event, a song emerges fully-formed". Part of her schtick is completely demystifying the process. Whether we should believe her is a different matter.
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:34 (ten years ago)
Part of her schtick is completely demystifying the process
ha i think of it as mystifying the process further ie she has no intention of telling us how she actually writes songs so she trots out this very basic line as a disguise (and it just so happens to be one that's tremendously effective in terms of PR)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:38 (ten years ago)
the whole "who is each song about????" thing has really been key to taylor's rise and i think it's telling that as she's played more to non-teen audiences the clues in her songs have become more and more obvious
she probably understands that most adults and all tabloid writers are basic bitches in a way that her teen fanbase wasn't
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:40 (ten years ago)
― Tim F, Wednesday, December 3, 2014 10:28 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ha yeah it really is tho. in another year i don't think i'd have had to seize on to taylor swift's worst album to SAVE it
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:41 (ten years ago)
xpost I for one long for the subtlety of "Dear John".
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:42 (ten years ago)
"dear john" was the start of it! in fact speak now was exactly when she started waving cheat sheets at everyone
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:44 (ten years ago)
but before Speak Now there weren't public people in her life to write about?
re. "refuse to divulge the names" surely gender is a part of this? obv Carly Simon has lived off this source of attention for 30+ years. did Joni Mitchell name names at the time?
― droit au butt (Euler), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 10:52 (ten years ago)
I thought the only actual-boyfriend song before Speak Now was "Forever & Always" about Nick Jonas, though by the time I saw Taylor on the final leg of the Fearless tour she'd already introduced an entire "if you date me and mess up I will write a song about you" narrative set piece into her show.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:06 (ten years ago)
I don't think Joni or Carly worked this angle quite so relentlessly. Taylor's always saying "This song is about a famous ex-boyfriend" and then being all coy when someone asks who. Personally I enjoy Out of the Woods a lot more if I don't picture Harry Styles.
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:09 (ten years ago)
I expect the best thing about taylor targeting older fans to be less annoying live shows.
On the Red tour, notwithstanding that we were in seats near the back, a twelve year old girl in front of me waved a massive sign in front of my eyes the entire time so I saw nothing, intermittently turning round to give me a "sorry not sorry" look, her massive dad turning around more frequently to preemptively frown at me as if to say "if you even think of suggesting to my angel that she might want to put her sign down for a moment I will carefully dissemble you limb from limb."
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:10 (ten years ago)
Ha ha
― Re-Make/Re-Model, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:12 (ten years ago)
I did love this line in a Complex piece talking about Mayer and "Dear John":
"The “Daughters” singer claimed to be “humiliated” by the song (burn). Swift’s response was to call Mayer “presumptuous” to think the song was about him (double-burn, and triple-burn, because it’s obviously about him)."
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:13 (ten years ago)
Oh this is easily my album of the year.
― abcfsk, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:44 (ten years ago)
I thought the only actual-boyfriend song before Speak Now was "Forever & Always" about Nick Jonas
I mean Joe Jonas here obv.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:45 (ten years ago)
I don't think Joni or Carly worked this angle quite so relentlessly. Taylor's always saying "This song is about a famous ex-boyfriend"
album sales not down in seventies
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 11:57 (ten years ago)
Not really. She's been writing about her relationships since her first album ("Picture to burn", "Our song", etc). Then, post-Fearless, her public life sort of exploded into the media and she started dating all these famous people, so all those songs that, in the past, could have been linked to some anonymous guy, were now inspired by fellow celebrities.
they feel like perfect encapsulations of who you/she used to be and that necessarily means you/she can never be that person again
Totally agree with that. Back when I first heard "Fifteen", I was really impressed with how precisely the song captured the feelings of being a teenager (and of course with the fact she wrote it when she was 17/18, practically "on the fly", while other songwriters would need to let 10/15 go by to go back to their teenage years and elaborate on them).
One thing that really made her stand out was the variety of relationships she used to write about was quite wide; not just romantic, but also her family and friends. Both Red and 1989 have been narrowing her focus and making her more conventional, but I suppose that reflects changes in her own interests and worries. I'm not sure "1989" or "Red" are as successful as "Speak Now" or "Fearless" were in portraying the age she was when she wrote them, but nevertheless they are successful to a degree, while moving forward in a direction that makes sense and being really good albums on their own.
And the feeling I get with this one not being as brilliant as some of her previous efforts, that's probably related to the fact that I rate those previous efforts extremely high. I know I've also been listening to 1989 obsessively too and it gets better with every listen.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 12:02 (ten years ago)
Pretty sure that a lot of the material on the first album and (to some extent) the second album is entirely based on imagined relationships anyway, excepting perhaps the "why don't you notice me" / "what does he see in her" / "I have a huge crush on you" songs ("Teardrops On My Guitar", "Stay Beautiful", "Invisible", "Hey Stephen", "You Belong With Me"). Which is not to say that these stand in strict contrast to more autobiographical material later on; if anything the fact that she wrote a song like "Tim McGraw" before she'd ever been in a real relationship should act as a warning to any easy assumption that her more autobiographical-seeming later songs are necessarily based on anything specific that happened to her.
There's a real "worked up" wide-angle set piece quality to a lot of the earlier relationship songs that betray their fictional, world-building origins: this is pretty obvious from the literal expanse of time covered in "Tim McGraw" or "Mine" or (most extremely) "Mary's Song", but it's also present in, say, "Love Story" or "The Way You Loved Me". And those are all quite archetypal relationship narratives made wonderful or strange to greater or lesser extents by Taylor's eye for detail. I'd certainly agree that the perspective she brings to the songs tends to tie each album together as belonging to a particular stage in her development: you can see the morphing relationship ideal from "Mary's Song" through "Love Story" through "Mine" through "State of Grace" to "Wildest Dreams".
― Tim F, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 15:49 (ten years ago)
("i wish you would" and "all you had to do was stay" exemplify this for me - i enjoy them a lot but i don't think i FEEL them)
imo you gotta walk home in the freezing wind while dramatically acting them out
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:08 (ten years ago)
"i wish you would" - superior haim-esque pastiche but still haim-esque pastiche that's too in thrall to another decade
also think there's more going on in this song than haim; someone mentioned upthread that the half-time drums in the chorus are totally derived from emo, and idk, does "haim-esque pastiche" amount to "clipped and rushed phrasing"?
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:09 (ten years ago)
i guess cascading gated drums too yeah
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:12 (ten years ago)
what have you against cascading gated drums
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:15 (ten years ago)
nothing! you know me!
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:16 (ten years ago)
oh maybe it's cuz i don't like emo then! (i'm not a fan of the drums in that song.) (wasted on the night bus home is recommended for this album tho.)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:30 (ten years ago)
I know I'm alone in this but "I Wish You Would" really reminds me of "Dancing in the dark" in the sense that both of them are songs of people locked in a room, crawling the walls with frustration.
― cpl593H, Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:43 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnR5KknFffU
http://i.imgur.com/a95ojeb.png
3 million upvotes
― Raccoon Tanuki, Thursday, 4 December 2014 13:15 (ten years ago)
thanks for staying on top of this Raccoon Tanuki
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 4 December 2014 13:18 (ten years ago)
n.p. Good song though.
― Raccoon Tanuki, Thursday, 4 December 2014 13:21 (ten years ago)
"The drought was the very worst"
;_; <3
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Friday, 5 December 2014 22:42 (ten years ago)
i can't get over her singing on "clean"; she's never sounded better
― prolego, Friday, 5 December 2014 23:23 (ten years ago)
Totally. Totally. It's amazing.
― a pleasant little psychedelic detour in the elevator (Amory Blaine), Saturday, 6 December 2014 00:54 (ten years ago)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, December 3, 2014 5:38 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
but the voice memo things are totally demystifying!
anyway i don't mind her nice/evil pop distinction except to the extent it is normative. but also it forgets about dirty pop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Leb2xG2XkEw
― celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Monday, 8 December 2014 19:32 (ten years ago)
could not conceive a situation i'm more jealous of https://twitter.com/lordemusic/status/526600371255255040
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 9 December 2014 06:17 (ten years ago)
I like to imagine she heard it here, near the Lompoc Wendy's on the PCH.
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 06:30 (ten years ago)
ah, I guess that is the CA1 but not technically the PCH ;_;
― $0.00 Butter sauce only. No marinara. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 9 December 2014 06:32 (ten years ago)
haaa i still haven't listened to the voice memos
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 9 December 2014 10:54 (ten years ago)
http://giant.gfycat.com/IllinformedReasonableChickadee.gif
― Plasmon, Friday, 12 December 2014 06:44 (ten years ago)
Gentle hit piece: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music/computer-tech-taught-taylor-swift-guitar-exclusive-article-1.2072638
My friend grew up in the same suburban house as T. Swift, right before her. She figures Swift got her old bedroom.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 12 January 2015 22:38 (ten years ago)
The author of that piece seems maybe reasonable. The people depress me. It's a bit ridiculous to be paid in full for a service and then complain that you only received a $5,000 guitar and a platinum album on top of that when your student found great success.
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 12 January 2015 23:08 (ten years ago)
can't access the link but to be fair it's not like she's known for her guitar skills. 5K and a record seems pretty fair.
― resulting post (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 09:43 (ten years ago)
He seems to be bemoaning the fact he never got any recognition as "Taylor's guitar teacher" rather than financial rewards.
― groovypanda, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:12 (ten years ago)
Yeah, I think that was it. Though he's not really making a stink about it. The photographer cut off from Swift Inc. seems to have a more aggrieved claim.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 14:25 (ten years ago)
The gist I got from the piece is it's not so much these guys are mad or anything, just a little annoyed that the official Swift mythology has manipulated the truth into something more magical. So it's not some random computer guy who teaches Taylor a few chords and off she goes, it's a guitar guy (who also does computers) who gives her paid lessons and even records a few demos. Or that Swift did not grow up on a Christmas tree farm, her family owned an extra plot of hobby land on which they grew and sold Christmas trees. Don't know much about her family, other than she had a more than comfortable childhood, but the piece did also imply her mom was maybe more stage-momish than I thought. None of this has any bearing on Swift the person. She seems like a sweetheart. But the Swift Inc. machine, at least in the start, seems like it was significant.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 14:30 (ten years ago)
I've always inferred a bit of stage parenting from the mere fact of relocating the whole family to Nashville for a 14-year-old's music career. But as far as puncturing myths goes, not a lot of gotchas in that story. She actually did take guitar lessons from a computer tech -- that makes her story about 90 percent more true than most showbiz origin tales.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 17:09 (ten years ago)
it was the poorest christmas tree farm in west virginia. my father securitized it before they found oil on it
― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 17:17 (ten years ago)
xp Yeah, and I think the author at least acknowledges this much in the bit about Bobby D. I'm still a bit confused about the guitar teacher's desire for acknowledgement. If he wants the acknowledgement for his guitar teaching business, he has the platinum record and probably a note along with it. Those should serve that purpose well enough. If he thinks he's just owed a more public thanks and acknowledgement, I think that feeling is understandable but also misguided. He was paid to teach someone some basic guitar and songwriting mechanics. T Swift is not a sensation because she's the first to play an open C chord on stage. In academia, we'd thank a company that gave us discounted or free equipment for an experiment, but one is never obligated to publicly acknowledge something for which you paid full price.
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 17:27 (ten years ago)
I am T Swift's mom btw
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 17:29 (ten years ago)
i am more bothered that i've already stopped playing most of this album than by whatever pointlessness that piece was
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:07 (ten years ago)
It seemed to me that the title of the piece beginning with an all-caps EXCLUSIVE and incorporating scare quotes that the writer is trying to drum up drama or at the very least hint at it to sell a story. In the story the dude seems cautious about coming across as good-natured and doesn't ask for anything in return. When he questions the workings of her publicity team favoring a simplified/mythic version of history the writer immediately follows it up with “Growth is betrayal. There is no other route. There is no arriving somewhere without leaving somewhere.”, a quote from a John Updike book. It makes sense story-wise but it is a bit misleading cos following Ronnie's talk about her publicity team it makes it seem like those are his words.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:18 (ten years ago)
it's the second vague takedown of t-swift i've read recently that doesn't quite take anything down. (the mail found the girl who stole the guy she wrote "picture to burn" about in high school - they've now married. the girl was like, yeah, we had a teenage falling out over it, but she still came to have coffee with my little sister. there didn't seem to be any bad blood or negative revelations, though i was interested by this girl's casual aside that taylor was never really country bc she came from philly so she thinks 1989 is more suited to her anyway)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:26 (ten years ago)
Lex you ever been to Philly
― 龜, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:38 (ten years ago)
i'm just reporting what this girl said, have a seat with your wannabe zings
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:39 (ten years ago)
Lex you ever think that somebody's not trying to zing you
― 龜, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:42 (ten years ago)
lots of watanabe zings in anglelina's new movie
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)
xp most of the time when i'm interacting with people who aren't you
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:52 (ten years ago)
i'm gonna have "if you wannabe my zinger" in my head all day now.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:36 (ten years ago)
taylor was never really country bc she came from philly
Boy, does she not come from Philly. She comes from an affluent part of Reading, a suburb outside of Philly, maybe an hour or so away. I don't know if Reading is country, but it sure has lots of outlet shopping and is close to Lancaster. Surprised there are no Swift songs about buggies or characters with the last name Zook.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:48 (ten years ago)
"The gist I got from the piece is it's not so much these guys are mad or anything, just a little annoyed that the official Swift mythology has manipulated the truth into something more magical."
there are people in the world who don't assume anything a celebrity tells to the press comes pre-massaged by publicists?
― katherine, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:57 (ten years ago)
(I mean, obviously yes, but still)
― katherine, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:58 (ten years ago)
Everything she does is 100% calculated. Ditto Beyoncé. (Love them both, for the record.) We probably need at least one or two pop stars to be completely shiny all of the time, and most humans are not capable of (or willing to do) that. The control she is able to exert over her narrative is remarkable. Sure, she has an entire team of people helping her to construct that narrative -- but I definitely get the impression that she is steering her own ship to a degree uncommon among pop stars of any age (let alone 25 year old ones).
― ...J, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:00 (ten years ago)
I hope she eventually got to eat pizza.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:07 (ten years ago)
a stream of crunchwrap supremes unbridled
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:08 (ten years ago)
as for the stage mom / pageant stuff, if your kid is interested in performing, that's just what you do. you give them guitar (or voice, or whatever) lessons, if you're in a sufficiently rural/southern area you probably do pageants (country music is big at pageants, can't tell you how much martina mcbride I've heard; so is broadway, hence the crossover of people like laura bell bundy)
― katherine, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:09 (ten years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:48 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark
Lolololol a good friend of mine growing up (in Philly) had the last name Zook - I had no idea it was a Reading thing
― 龜, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:11 (ten years ago)
Amish thing I thought!
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:12 (ten years ago)
http://www.hexsigns.com/
― $80 is absurd and very ridiculous! (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 13 January 2015 20:13 (ten years ago)
Sure she controls her narrative, and the narratives she tells (on lives, framed like a storybook / campfire with friends etc) but "completely shiny" or 'controlled' hardly defines her - from reading tons of interviews and pieces on her through 7 years what I feel defines her as popstar PR is how much she talks _about_ the narrative and how it's created, how it's perceived, how this album and that album may contribute to that, how her artistic choices fit in-- I don't think I've seen a big pop star of recent times talk as much about her career arc and where she wants to take it. Next album, ten years ahead, 30. Glossing over her press game as simply 'shiny' or 'controlled' is a super-superficial reading, she's always been quite a beast of her own in how she talks about herself in media.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 22:47 (ten years ago)
My point is not that anything defines her; it's that she defines herself (to a remarkable degree).
― ...J, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:05 (ten years ago)
― abcfsk, Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:47 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
This is OTM but it's also the thing which I feel she has in common with Beyonce.
Perhaps it should not be surprising that the two artists most successfully able to perpetuate a defined public image are artists who are so directly involved in the defining.
The extreme counter-example is of course Britney. But I think there are a lot of pop stars in the middle where one feels like their careers are a series of negotiations between what the artist thinks they should do/say and what the people around them think - and a lot of the inconsistency and changes in direction are likely to result from the roster of people changing.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 13 January 2015 23:12 (ten years ago)
hmmm.... https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/swift-taylor-1396036/page1
― UK Horseshit Cru (dog latin), Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:58 (ten years ago)
sorry, bad link: https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/swift-taylor-1396036/
― UK Horseshit Cru (dog latin), Thursday, 29 January 2015 12:59 (ten years ago)
LOVE LOVE LOVECosmetics; Fragrances; Cologne; Perfume; Make-up; Non-medicated preparations for the care of the skin, scalp, body and hair…Owned by: Swift, TaylorSerial Number: 85200161
Cosmetics; Fragrances; Cologne; Perfume; Make-up; Non-medicated preparations for the care of the skin, scalp, body and hair…
Owned by: Swift, Taylor
Serial Number: 85200161
Guess tMG are gonna be limited in their Walgreens tie-ins. Where does this come from? I don't remember the phrase "love, love, love" from any of her lyrics.
― how's life, Thursday, 29 January 2015 13:44 (ten years ago)
Tay and Haim touring together :>
― 龜, Sunday, 1 February 2015 20:08 (ten years ago)
lol concerts
― markers, Sunday, 1 February 2015 20:25 (ten years ago)
already posted several elsewheres buthttp://img2.timeinc.net/instyle/images/2015/WRN/012615-taylor-swift-594.jpg
― the plight of y0landa (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 1 February 2015 20:27 (ten years ago)
some nice texts: http://oneweekoneband.tumblr.com/tagged/1989
― Nourry, Wednesday, 4 February 2015 23:32 (ten years ago)
HOT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CmadmM5cOk
― ʎɐpunsunɾɐɔ (cajunsunday), Friday, 13 February 2015 14:53 (ten years ago)
relieved she didn't fuck it up. a taylor swift video that doesn't embarrass me counts as a success for her i guess
her taste in men remains superb obv
― lex pretend, Friday, 13 February 2015 15:14 (ten years ago)
hahah what this video his horrible
― J0rdan S., Friday, 13 February 2015 15:20 (ten years ago)
is that a pizza crust on her left side
― guess that bundt gettin eaten (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 13 February 2015 15:23 (ten years ago)
extended cut of true detective opening credits
― johnny crunch, Friday, 13 February 2015 15:23 (ten years ago)
http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5158133.ece/alternates/s615/MAIN-Taylor-Swift.jpg
two paper airplanes flying flying flying
― ʎɐpunsunɾɐɔ (cajunsunday), Friday, 13 February 2015 15:32 (ten years ago)
video has drifting pools of fabric and is way too dark and features a dude unpeeling himself from a shirt so this is the video i envisioned
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 13 February 2015 15:32 (ten years ago)
could've been better but whatev, song is about projections, video is all projections
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Friday, 13 February 2015 15:33 (ten years ago)
Taylor Swift @taylorswift13 · Feb 15Sending my love to all the lonely Starbucks lovers out there this Valentine's Day.....even though that is not the correct lyric.
lol cute
― Roz, Monday, 16 February 2015 06:48 (ten years ago)
Video is what I think 'Twilight' is like having never seen it
― 龜, Monday, 16 February 2015 13:25 (ten years ago)
saw this @ a tjmaxx today
http://i62.tinypic.com/30shil0.jpg
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 7 March 2015 20:03 (ten years ago)
lol what the fuck
― gybe horses (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 8 March 2015 04:09 (ten years ago)
you too can be tswift
― Maybe in 100 years someone will say damn Dawn was dope. (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 8 March 2015 05:30 (ten years ago)
you could buy a real guitar for $500
― Team Foxcatcherwatcher (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 8 March 2015 15:58 (ten years ago)
i realised i was wrong with 'starbucks lovers' quite quickly, but like a hundred listens in i suddenly hear it's 'fade into view' and not 'fake interview'? huh
― cis-het shitlord (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 18 March 2015 23:51 (ten years ago)
wait "bad blood" is the next single? and "style" pretty much came and went without a splash? can't wait to put this era behind us tbh NEXT ALBUM PLEASE
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 09:28 (ten years ago)
it's really not like any of this is in regular rotation any more apart from "style"
Lots of Calvn Harris on the next one I guess
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 09:32 (ten years ago)
so the rumour is Bad Blood remix with Kanye verse as a sort of meta ironic LOLZ clickbait thingy, and that would mirror Katy Perry having a Kanye remix on ET etc etc SO METARANDOM
at least thats what my office pop gang are telling me
― jamiesummerz, Friday, 17 April 2015 11:14 (ten years ago)
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 10:32 Bookmark
i'm still rooting for fairytale of new york 2015 ft sean st ledger
― r|t|c, Friday, 17 April 2015 11:59 (ten years ago)
I'm still digging a lot of the could-be/haven't-been singles -- "All You Had to Do Was Stay," "I Wish You Would," "Clean," "How You Get the Girl." My estimation of the album hasn't really changed, I still think it's lesser Taylor, but there's plenty to like.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 17 April 2015 12:55 (ten years ago)
so, so not true for me but ymmv i guess
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Friday, 17 April 2015 13:23 (ten years ago)
style was also top 10 in multiple territories so "came and went without a splash" is a little unfair
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Friday, 17 April 2015 13:25 (ten years ago)
Yeah, Style is like top 3 on radio overall in the US and peaked at #6 on the Hot 100. Hardly a bad showing given she didn't do much to promote it. But it seems like she's dealing with personal stuff too, so that explains why she stopped promoting for awhile.
Album still bangs. I think I might prefer it over Red now.
― Greer, Friday, 17 April 2015 13:31 (ten years ago)
down here "Style" has gotten almost as much airplay as its two predecessors.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 April 2015 13:47 (ten years ago)
Do third or fourth singles from Taylor albums ever have an impact? Pretty sure the entire world has bought or otherwise obtained each album by the time the relevant third single rolls around.
― Tim F, Friday, 17 April 2015 13:50 (ten years ago)
you know what i mean, "style" didn't flop by any means but it never became a ubiquitous cultural phenomenon like "shake it off" or "blank space" (and i guess we'll see with "bad blood" but she's certainly bringing out more big guns for it - did she even do any live performance of "style" other than the victoria's secret thing?)
i'd forgotten about her personal issues though, that could explain it
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:28 (ten years ago)
If she'd gone with my video clip idea "Style" would have become a ubiquitous cultural phenomenon
― Tim F, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:38 (ten years ago)
if she'd bothered with any video clip idea at all beyond "stand in front of white screen and you - shirt off" that would've been a start
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:43 (ten years ago)
let's please remember that the person who said "Style" came and went then begged in all caps for this album to come and go
― da croupier, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:48 (ten years ago)
"Style" kept her on the radio while she was prepping for the summer tour, i don't think any emergency meetings have been held to correct course
― da croupier, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:54 (ten years ago)
― da croupier, Friday, April 17, 2015 2:48 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
feel free to note down whatever this even means in your .xls
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:55 (ten years ago)
you're mixing up your americans again
― da croupier, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:56 (ten years ago)
to spell things out for those who need it
- "style" came and went without much promo or becoming a ubiquitous cultural phenomenon, as i think we'd all agree its quality would deserve- i am not suggesting that this is cause for concern or that it wasn't justified given taylor's personal issues- much more effort is apparently being put into a much inferior single, the third out of four this era that will cause me deep second-hand embarrassment- but the net effect is that, along with the album not having stuck as much as her previous ones, this era is generally an unsatisfying one for me and i am ready to move on from it
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 14:58 (ten years ago)
IMO style is the kind of great that's more enduring than splashy, the kind of song people years later are surprised didn't chart higher. Maybe not "you make my dreams come true" or "don't stop believing" level classic but similar in that what was treated like Another Hit feels like The Perfect Hit divorced from zeitgeist and hype.
Your initial shorthand came off like hatorade blinkers re its success rather than a desire to see it do better, hence all the corrective comments. sorry if that wasn't the case
― da croupier, Friday, 17 April 2015 15:06 (ten years ago)
style" came and went without much promo or becoming a ubiquitous cultural phenomenon
An odd thing to note given how many singles she's released in nine years. Maybe as critics we're primed to think about cultural phenomena; the public just hears another Taylor Swift single.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 April 2015 15:22 (ten years ago)
in terms of being cultural phenomenons "shake it off" and "blank space" are pretty rare
― J0rdan S., Friday, 17 April 2015 15:35 (ten years ago)
i heard someone say it might not be kanye on the "bad blood" remix but kendrick
either way the song is irredeemably trash so
― dyl, Friday, 17 April 2015 15:57 (ten years ago)
Still banging New Romance here on the daily
― ineloquentwow (Craigo Boingo), Friday, 17 April 2015 18:22 (ten years ago)
I've somewhat stopped listening to 1989 in the last few weeks, but that only happened after 2521 scrobbles so I'd say it has had a sizeable lifespan so far.
― cpl593H, Friday, 17 April 2015 18:26 (ten years ago)
'all you had to do was stay' would be such a sick single
but then again so would every song on the album
― nose, Friday, 17 April 2015 18:53 (ten years ago)
idk 1989 didn't have much longevity for me at all. most of the songs are in 'u can tell if u like it within 1.5 seconds of it starting' territory and don't really offer much more with repeated listening
― dyl, Friday, 17 April 2015 19:14 (ten years ago)
that was not my experience at all!
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Friday, 17 April 2015 19:25 (ten years ago)
I heard "Wildest Dreams" on a store radio and thought it might be a new single and it seemed to make weird perfect sense, a "Show Me Heaven" for 2015.
But perhaps not.
― Tim F, Friday, 17 April 2015 20:47 (ten years ago)
Yeah dyl's experience is largely mine, and that's with this album benefiting from a weirdly subpar 2014 esp for pop
It's obv not a bad album by any means but people really feel not even trace disappointment or dissatisfaction with how this era's gone? Music and ~campaign
― lex pretend, Friday, 17 April 2015 22:40 (ten years ago)
i still play it constantly, prob not enough tbh
― johnny crunch, Friday, 17 April 2015 22:42 (ten years ago)
I get secondhand embarrassment/disappointment from how many songs seem to be abt Harry Styles
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 17 April 2015 22:45 (ten years ago)
bad blood is a good song fyi and i do not want a kendrick/kanye vers
― johnny crunch, Friday, 17 April 2015 22:56 (ten years ago)
tho maybe if kendrick dropped some conscious shit in there itd blow minds hm reconsidering
― johnny crunch, Friday, 17 April 2015 22:57 (ten years ago)
I guess I should give this album a second chance at some point. Is she ever gonna release a banjo version though? I think she's really underestimating how well her voice jibes with a banjo.
― louie louie whoa baby imago (how's life), Friday, 17 April 2015 22:57 (ten years ago)
I thought the ~*gossip point*~ was that katy perry would be on the remix
― katherine, Friday, 17 April 2015 23:34 (ten years ago)
i'm waiting patiently for her inevitable return to country in like 2030
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Friday, 17 April 2015 23:44 (ten years ago)
That'll happen, but first there will be acoustic solo thing. Maybe when she turns 30, called "30."
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 18 April 2015 02:13 (ten years ago)
I quite like Bad Blood, but it does seem like a strange choice for a single. I guess the final one will be a ballad? Hoping for This Love...
― MikoMcha, Saturday, 18 April 2015 06:14 (ten years ago)
Someone who went to the opening night of the tour said this was the setlist:
Welcome to New YorkNew RomanticsBlank SpaceI Knew You Were TroubleI Wish You WouldHow You Get the GirlI Know PlacesAll You Had To Do Was StayYou are in Love (acoustic)CleanLove StoryStyleThis LoveBad BloodWe are Never Ever Getting Back TogetherEnchanted/Wildest DreamsOut of the WoodsShake It Off
― Greer, Tuesday, 5 May 2015 17:31 (ten years ago)
omg @ "enchanted/wildest dreams"
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 5 May 2015 17:36 (ten years ago)
new romantics trending on twitter
― Premise ridiculous. Who have two potato? (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 5 May 2015 17:37 (ten years ago)
AND ACOUSTIC "YOU ARE IN LOVE" AHHHHH
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 5 May 2015 17:37 (ten years ago)
https://41.media.tumblr.com/5fa9b2923d4133317f22db06dd9ec3a1/tumblr_nnzb5lpQ1x1rk3uipo1_1280.jpg
― yellow fetwapper (how's life), Thursday, 7 May 2015 12:22 (ten years ago)
ugh
― johnny crunch, Thursday, 7 May 2015 12:24 (ten years ago)
so much bad mid-aughts stuff going on in that promo
― “audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 7 May 2015 14:47 (ten years ago)
they missed the brass ring by not having her "starring as CATAYTAYSTROPHE"
taylor swift starring as kerning catastrophe
― katherine, Thursday, 7 May 2015 16:31 (ten years ago)
Is this a promo for the new Wolfenstein game?
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 7 May 2015 16:41 (ten years ago)
sorta wishing this amount of effort and hype was put into the "style" video rather than one for this song
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Sunday, 10 May 2015 23:38 (ten years ago)
this campaign is going to kill me
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 10 May 2015 23:46 (ten years ago)
rip
― markers, Monday, 11 May 2015 00:01 (ten years ago)
nsfl
― prolego, Monday, 11 May 2015 00:23 (ten years ago)
I wish she'd frosted her tips to play Lucky Fieri
― da croupier, Monday, 11 May 2015 00:26 (ten years ago)
well this is taking a turn for the thinkpiece
― katherine, Monday, 11 May 2015 13:30 (ten years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/Yxc8BbE.jpg
Ok I'm never gonna watch this video now
― 龜, Wednesday, 13 May 2015 20:12 (ten years ago)
who the fuck are these people
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 13 May 2015 20:59 (ten years ago)
i really have no idea who half of them are either
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 13 May 2015 21:03 (ten years ago)
and half the ones i do know about i have no idea why the fuck anyone cares about them
a lot of them are models afaict?
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Wednesday, 13 May 2015 21:32 (ten years ago)
was more excited when only hayley williams was confirmed
Four of them are a) fairly famous models and b) BFFs with Taylor.
― Petite Lamela (ShariVari), Wednesday, 13 May 2015 23:50 (ten years ago)
Well NOW I care
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 14 May 2015 00:46 (ten years ago)
At some point we may have to recognise that the 3.3m people who follow Gigi Hadid on Instagram might be closer to her core audience than a bunch of crit dudes in their late twenties / mid thirties.
― Petite Lamela (ShariVari), Thursday, 14 May 2015 05:18 (ten years ago)
Well yeah, I've been wondering why anyone here's bothered tbh, outside of this thread I haven't seen anything abt it
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 14 May 2015 05:51 (ten years ago)
I can't recall build up for a pop music video to this extent since probably "telephone"
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Thursday, 14 May 2015 06:01 (ten years ago)
ikr, i think it'll be really funny if the video ends up being as boring/crap as most of her past videos
― dyl, Thursday, 14 May 2015 07:52 (ten years ago)
hard to imagine what it can be other than some "Black Widow" redux
― Sharkie, Thursday, 14 May 2015 21:55 (ten years ago)
i don't know how many listens after, i think Clean might be my fav. track on this.
― Van Horn Street, Friday, 15 May 2015 03:03 (ten years ago)
Clean is great. Liking New Romantics and You are in Love a lot recently
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Friday, 15 May 2015 04:10 (ten years ago)
I love Clean. She makes the cliches work because it feels like she's just discovered them for herself.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Friday, 15 May 2015 12:40 (ten years ago)
i revisited this today! "i wish you would" is the fuckin best
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Friday, 15 May 2015 14:13 (ten years ago)
The video: http://youtu.be/QcIy9NiNbmo
― Nourry, Monday, 18 May 2015 06:49 (ten years ago)
Pretty bad, but I was expecting some ten minute pretend pulp opera to play out so there were fewer minutes of cringing than expected. Guess it's an impressive statement of 'look at my friends', though.
― abcfsk, Monday, 18 May 2015 07:14 (ten years ago)
Yeah, this isn't very good. I was actually into the idea of a pulp opera - or at least was expecting a narrative of some kind.
― MikoMcha, Monday, 18 May 2015 07:28 (ten years ago)
i was relieved at the lack of narrative - it's less the feared "intense second-hand embarrassment pt 3" of the era and more just a huge "what if she'd done all of this, including a kendrick alliance i'm 100% in favour of, for a song that wasn't total shit" missed opportunity
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 May 2015 07:55 (ten years ago)
oh i thought u were talking about Anna (kendrick.) i'm friends with her brother!!!!!
this album sucks and Taylor Swift needs to change up her style stat o_O in part, it sucks bc some of it is actually decent. it's just ... her. she really need a personality.
shake it off is some watered down MJ shit and blank space is basically Miley revisited (which, let's be honest, didn't need to happen.) as for the rest of it, it's like a latter-career Tori Amos album with a shit-ton of $$$ on it.
― surm, Monday, 18 May 2015 11:12 (ten years ago)
The best idea here is removing as much of the song as possible and replacing it with tossed-off Kendrick bits.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 18 May 2015 12:23 (ten years ago)
The Kendrick bits don't seem to add much (even though as usual he surpasses the brief and some). I actually like the original version of this track as is, especially the layered melodies over the repetition and chanting at the end.
But I guess another issue I have is that stuff like Shake It Off and some part of this video showcase her dorkiness.
― MikoMcha, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:12 (ten years ago)
i actually can't remember the verses that kendrick replaced, high fucking five to my brain for that
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:22 (ten years ago)
One one viewing I felt like I marginally approve of the clip but I think mainly because it gave me the impression that Taylor thinks this song is pretty silly as well.
A high concept / extended narrative video clip for this song would have been ridic.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:25 (ten years ago)
i just realised that the allstar cameos etc would've worked super well for "new romantics"
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:27 (ten years ago)
How many hundred days do you think it is until taylor makes a film clip basically the same as Britney's "Everytime" but starring Jamie Dornan?
― Tim F, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:33 (ten years ago)
Her "dorkiness" is a massive part of her brand I guess, it's a pity. Not sure if it's any more real than her anti-dating stance, not that that makes much difference
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Monday, 18 May 2015 13:35 (ten years ago)
"new romantics" would be a dream fourth single. it came on in the gym the other day! whoever is controlling the spotify playlist there KNOWS.
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Monday, 18 May 2015 13:53 (ten years ago)
fifth* single, rather
I think the next single will be a ballad. Wildest Dreams or This Love.
― MikoMcha, Monday, 18 May 2015 13:55 (ten years ago)
omg i don't know why i posted in this thread. i didn't mean to interrupt - please go on without me!
― surm, Monday, 18 May 2015 14:41 (ten years ago)
video is not nearly as bad as it could have been but yeah it's hard to salvage that song lol. kendrick's parts aren't great or anything but they're certainly better than kanye's contribution on the "e.t." single mix lol
― dyl, Monday, 18 May 2015 14:55 (ten years ago)
kanye's verse on E.T. is so terrible it's classic for me. "tell me what's next, alien sex", you can't make that shit up.
― Sharkie, Monday, 18 May 2015 16:06 (ten years ago)
I know this is I Love Music and not I Hate Music but I heard a TS song for the first time last week and it was some of the stupidest, unimaginative cliched pop I've ever heard. At first I thought it was a no-name also-ran and was pretty surprised to hear it was the hit single from a supposed titan of pop music. In 25 years nobody will care about Taylor Swift. It's entirely unremarkable music.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 18 May 2015 17:22 (ten years ago)
Shake it Off will do that to you.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 18 May 2015 17:35 (ten years ago)
Well next year will be 10 years from Tim McGraw and people still seem to care so I wouldn't be too optimistic about the prospects of her being forgotten in 15 years.
― cpl593H, Monday, 18 May 2015 17:54 (ten years ago)
She's been one of the biggest economic forces in the music industry for what, 5 years now? We haven't forgot who was enormously popular in 1990. I don't think we will for 2015.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 18 May 2015 17:57 (ten years ago)
i like the video, it's like if a woman made sucker punch, like 'hey i can hangout in my fifth element cosplay on my lightcycle with space kendrick' which tbh sounds like a good timemy sister was telling me yesterday how she imagines t swift is her best friend, and i was like *ok shrug*but then i saw that video later that night and was like 'naw i guess it'd be cool if it were in this dumb action movie way'
― he sounds like a parrot eating a carrot (Crabbits), Monday, 18 May 2015 17:58 (ten years ago)
always think it's funny when ppl say of a current pop star "o she's not MADONNA she's more like this generation's PAULA ABDUL" as though paula abdul isn't remembered!
― lex pretend, Monday, 18 May 2015 17:58 (ten years ago)
who is this generation's debbie deb, that is my question, bcz i want to hear her
― he sounds like a parrot eating a carrot (Crabbits), Monday, 18 May 2015 18:00 (ten years ago)
xpost i think 'this generation's [insert famous artist]' is a strange way of looking at music and ~the passing of time, fwiw.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 18 May 2015 18:01 (ten years ago)
"Style" is the one on every hour on KISS FM these days, and it would be easier to take if the chorus wasn't repeated over and over again. That's so great that he has that James Dean daydream in his eyes and you have that red lip classic thing that he likes. I could listen to you sing about it for hours, I feel like I already have. But I want to know more anyway. Maybe a verse written directly from the POV of the skirt to the t-shirt?
― Vic Perry, Monday, 18 May 2015 18:02 (ten years ago)
abbott prob becky g, but i would forward tkay maidzahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvzC4TfsrI0
― “audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Monday, 18 May 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)
I felt like she had the balancing act between her old approachable persona and her new pop fabulousness just right up till now but a bombastic, star-studded Joseph Kahn video riffing on two movies from the mid-00s feels so rote in a weird way.
― Continue your brooding monologue (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 18 May 2015 20:00 (ten years ago)
she's this generation's Marion Harris
― example (crüt), Monday, 18 May 2015 20:42 (ten years ago)
Tim McGraw isn't rly remembered at all. For one thing, who is he? And Paula Abdul's sort of remembered, I guess. Mostly bc of American Idol tho. Ws Promise if a New Day her?
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Monday, 18 May 2015 21:40 (ten years ago)
cpl593H was referring to "tim mcgraw," which is the title of taylor's first single that was released in 06
― dyl, Monday, 18 May 2015 23:01 (ten years ago)
In 25 years nobody will care about Taylor Swift. It's entirely unremarkable music.
Hate Taylor Swift all want -- I hate "Shake It Off" and love the album. But your line is a bunch of bullshit. Implicit in it is the feeling that "someone" will care about good pop in 25 years, as if that were an accurate gauge about anything.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 May 2015 23:05 (ten years ago)
*all you want.
KNOWS to not to even use Spotify because Taylor Swift isn't on there?
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 May 2015 23:14 (ten years ago)
i love "shake it off" and am kinda surprised/vaguely bummed that ilm hates it. though tbh i suspect that my taste in music is actually pretty bad.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 18 May 2015 23:22 (ten years ago)
It rules! Best song off this campaign easy. Alfred that argument's weird coming frm a Go-Betweens fan
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 00:03 (ten years ago)
what's the weird part?
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 00:04 (ten years ago)
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, May 18, 2015 7:22 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
ha this is me exactly
― rip van wanko, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 00:07 (ten years ago)
If ppl didn't keep caring for them noone'd know who they were
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 00:10 (ten years ago)
xpost i don't hate it. i like it.
― markers, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 01:06 (ten years ago)
― MarkoP, Monday, May 18, 2015 7:14 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver/2012/08/02/columbo/a%20columbo%20season%203%20peter%20falk%20dvd%20review%20PDVD_031.jpg
― slam dunk, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 02:25 (ten years ago)
hahaha ooof
this is a minor revelation for me though in that now i know the gym (which is open 24/7 and often unstaffed, but music is always playing) uses some other service
― bae sremmurd (monotony), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 02:27 (ten years ago)
Her karate moves here look way more awkward than any of the pretended awkwardness in Shake it off.
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 02:57 (ten years ago)
My daughter won me round to Shake It Off and I can barely remember why I used to dislike it. She thinks Bad Blood is lame though and Out of the Woods should have been the new single. Correct on both counts.
― Continue your brooding monologue (Re-Make/Re-Model), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 09:51 (ten years ago)
Her physical awkwardness is interesting in that it seems genuine. She's not a graceful woman, so instead of trying to cover it up she makes it part of her shtick.
― something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 12:47 (ten years ago)
Has anyone caught the resemblance to the horn chart riffs in "Shake It Off" to Van Morrison's "Jackie Wilson Said"?
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 May 2015 12:57 (ten years ago)
None of these models/singers/it-girls look too convincing as the techno-ninjas they're supposed to be playing but man, Swift looks like the dorkiest one by far. And when she tries to look like a badass, that only makes her more adorable. She's the Manny Pacquiao to Beyonce's Mayweather (??)
― cpl593H, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 13:14 (ten years ago)
t-swift has always had a very tall girl's awkwardness in carrying herself (would actually be v interested to read something on this from the body image angle) and is the opposite of a natural stage performer away from a musical instrument - it's been super-fascinating watch her train herself into this role ever since it became clear she'd have to do it. and yes, that's involved making dorkiness part of her shtick but what stands out more is how hard she must have worked in every other aspect of modern pop star physical comportment
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 13:22 (ten years ago)
putting the dorkiness front and centre basically seems like a safety net in case she stumbles
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 13:23 (ten years ago)
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/taylor-swifts-bad-blood-video-is-not-a-feminist-manif-1705257983
pretty good piece, despite the "well DUH"-ness of the headline
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 18:56 (ten years ago)
i am watching the video for the first time though and what the actual heck, i don't mind this song despite its silliness but this is real wack
also, request to the void: can no one ever cut to footage of lena dunham while rap is playing because literally no one is buying that lena dunham gives a single shit about black culture
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 19:01 (ten years ago)
yeah, they should've cut to Mariska Hargitay, she's a pretty serious hip hop head
― some dude, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 20:09 (ten years ago)
xpost irl lol
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 20:18 (ten years ago)
shipley i cant tell if yr zing is intended to state that i could make that (admittedly assumptive) claim about most of the guest stars in that video or as some lena dunham defense, either way i feel pretttaaayyy confident saying it about dunham, w/e though i guess
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 20:20 (ten years ago)
It's a pretentious piece of writing. "The troubling, underlying takeaway from this video..." The general license to write this way about stupid pop videos should have expired twenty years ago.
― Vic Perry, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 21:37 (ten years ago)
i'm laughing at your hilarious haughty outrage that lena dunham smoking a cigar in a taylor swift video is somehow asking anybody to buy the notion that she cares about black culture
― some dude, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 00:50 (ten years ago)
more like hyperbole-accented annoyance than outrage but hey we can't all be as effortlessly chill on the internet as you man
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 00:57 (ten years ago)
lol ok but i do wanna know what mariska hargitay listens to
― some dude, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 01:17 (ten years ago)
for some reason I'm imagining sade, she seems extremely chill
― slothroprhymes, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 01:27 (ten years ago)
this video isn't bad considering her history but idk, it comes across like a hollow approximation of the requisite imperial phase event video.
taylor going pop has more often than not felt like watching a very studious pupil rather than a natural pop performer. this video feels like a fan wanting to recreate "toxic" x "die another day" (which in theory is the best video evah) and doing a thoroughly competent but amateurish job.
― prolego, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 03:36 (ten years ago)
As Freud said, sometimes Lena Dunham smoking a cigar is just
― Vic Perry, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 04:28 (ten years ago)
everyone otm about this unfortunate video
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 05:52 (ten years ago)
http://www.shape.com/fitness/playlists/mariska-hargitays-got-dance-playlist
― how's life, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 12:59 (ten years ago)
Mariska HargitayApril 18, 2012 ·
What's on @Mariska's playlist right now? "Ingrid Michaelson and Yael Naim! And my son loves singing Adele's "Rolling in the Deep". -@Mariska Hargitay
― how's life, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 13:00 (ten years ago)
This behind-the-scenes shot of the “Bad Blood” babes sexily posing with In-N-Out burgers is a weird and vain attempt to appear casual and human that was vaporized yesterday afternoon when Nicki Minaj and Beyoncé actually chowed down on burgers in their “Feeling Myself” video.)
This is just a random aside from the article linked above, but I feel like I see a lot of this in internet writing, this idea that every minor pop culture moment is in direct, winner-take-all to-the-death competition with every other other minor pop culture moment. It strikes me as kind of weird.
― intheblanks, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 20:02 (ten years ago)
yes it's pretty aggravating, and sort of the moment when her entire premise cracks bc you could write the same article about any given beyoncé or nicki video (cf "run the world") depending on who you stan for
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 20:13 (ten years ago)
"Bad Blood" being all lead-up to two warring factions coming face to face at the very end definitely reminded me of both the Beyonce videos that do that ("Run The World" and "Superower"). but i wouldn't wanna be the person who has to fashion a whole thinkpiece out of that observation.
― some dude, Wednesday, 20 May 2015 20:18 (ten years ago)
Beyonce/Nicki's video is amazing sexy real fun.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 20:26 (ten years ago)
Adam what do you think of Beyonce musically? She beats Taylor vvvvv hard in every level personally, and sometimes the latter sounds kinda like the way you described her up thread to me
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:33 (ten years ago)
*on
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 21:34 (ten years ago)
Beyonce's voice is a force to be reckoned with, always has been, and the projects she chooses and collaborations are more interesting. Also im an OG Destiny's Child fan from the 90s and she and they seemed to have a futurist sound to them for me, like this energy and this pop sheen is going to explore the future of music. Don't want to rag anymore on Swift cos I do respect her and she plays her own instruments whoop-de-doo but I just find Beyonce in an entirely diff ballpark. Swift mainly comes across like she really want to be Beyonce these days, where Beyonce is just the future of music or something.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 23:38 (ten years ago)
I guess what everyone is talking about wrt grace, otm. Personally I don't care for "Oh I'm goofy, I'm a normal person" schtick and it comes across way more micro-managed than Beyonce's. I never listen to pop radio and find out about this stuff via internet music sites and vids so maybe that is coloring my perception too. Maybe Beyonce just has better marketing, it is more graceful. If I see her doing something it is usually a live performance or amazing non-gimmicky music video. Also reading internet message boards I've probably seen too many gifs of Taylor Swift rolling her eyes and being smug memes.
I have mad respect for both of them. I just personally don't care for Swift's music so far. Whereas Beyonce has sung like a dozen flat-out all-time classic pop tunes.
― ©Oz Quiz© (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 May 2015 23:43 (ten years ago)
So otm. Taylor's I'm a normal person and yr bff schtick gives me the creeps tbh
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:00 (ten years ago)
Oh bt I think Beyonce's superiority goes a long way beyond marketing. The fact her vaunted lack of personality got revealed to me as bullshit by my listening to her music attentively says a lot, I think. Like, giving good time interview shouldn't be so much of the battle
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 21 May 2015 01:04 (ten years ago)
That "time" shouldn't be there, sry phone
dunno if this is already on here but it's pretty funtrigger alert: you have to listen to shake it offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhT_gVh_73w
― “audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 21 May 2015 19:22 (ten years ago)
also the screenshot hoo boy
― “audience participation” otherwise known as “touching” (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 21 May 2015 19:23 (ten years ago)
Finally got around to checking out the video. Kendrick's part is a bit wack ("Hey, remember -- when you tried to write me off?") and I still hardly understand why all these models agreed to come to a shoot for a two-second cameo, but I digress... Overall I'm happy they reworked the song: the production for the video version is much tighter than on the album.
― Sharkie, Thursday, 21 May 2015 21:42 (ten years ago)
yes if there's one job that models usually refuse to book it's a music video by the biggest star in pop music
― some dude, Thursday, 21 May 2015 21:57 (ten years ago)
she was on the cover of vogue with karlie kloss, who she is friends with. others are also her friends.
― markers, Thursday, 21 May 2015 22:20 (ten years ago)
she has been into kendrick lamar. she is friends with hayley williams.
― markers, Thursday, 21 May 2015 22:21 (ten years ago)
http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/21/media/taylor-swift-1989-apple-music/
Taylor Swift appears to have prompted a policy change at Apple, after threatening to withhold her album "1989" from the company's streaming music service over royalty payments. Swift's issue is the three-month free trial period Apple is promoting.
"Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months," she wrote. "I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company."
She added: "It's not too late to change this policy and change the minds of those in the music industry who will be deeply and gravely affected by this. We don't ask you for free iPhones. Please don't ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation."
Apple responded to Swift late Sunday night in a series of tweets from Eddy Cue, a key lieutenant of CEO Tim Cook.
"#AppleMusic will pay artist for streaming, even during customer's free trial period," Cue tweeted, adding that "We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple."
We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple— Eddy Cue (@cue) June 22, 2015
― curmudgeon, Monday, 22 June 2015 13:55 (ten years ago)
She should ask for world peace next.
― abcfsk, Monday, 22 June 2015 14:31 (ten years ago)
i dont' understand what even would permit apple to not pay in the first place!
― wizzz! (amateurist), Monday, 22 June 2015 15:26 (ten years ago)
https://junction10.wordpress.com/2015/06/21/those-in-glass-houses-shouldnt-throw-stones/#more-339
― example (crüt), Monday, 22 June 2015 22:54 (ten years ago)
Not really similar at all.. it's her show.
― abcfsk, Monday, 22 June 2015 22:58 (ten years ago)
http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/06/22/revenge-of-the-nerds/
― Treeship, Monday, 22 June 2015 23:50 (ten years ago)
I like this article. The passive aggressiveness of her lyrics, and how that plays into her appeal, is something I've always been interested in
― Treeship, Monday, 22 June 2015 23:53 (ten years ago)
The masterstroke of all of this passive-aggression is, of course, “Dear John,” a single on her album Red.
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:01 (ten years ago)
this is not very good
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:04 (ten years ago)
Is it passive-aggressive to point out that song is not on Red?
xp!
She also misses the chance to connect Taylor to the entire lineage of passive-aggressive singer-songwriters, going back to Dylan or Cole Porter or whoever did it first.
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:09 (ten years ago)
it is also not a single
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:10 (ten years ago)
Good points. She is not the first to do this, but if seems like it's a uniquely large part of her appeal
― Treeship, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:11 (ten years ago)
I can forgive people for not knowing which songs are singles -- with Taylor especially, they all could be -- but getting the album right seems like a reasonable expectation even for the online portion of the Paris Review. (You're online! You have Google!)
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 01:24 (ten years ago)
"Taylor Swift Dear John"
About 5,210,000 results (0.45 seconds):
Artist: Taylor SwiftAlbum: Speak NowReleased: 2010
― groovypanda, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 07:40 (ten years ago)
Re: the photography thing, it's pretty similar if you're a photographer.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 08:02 (ten years ago)
It's not really. Whether it's fair or not (probably not) she grants access to photographers and they make money from images of her. No parallel to Apple making money from her music.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 09:47 (ten years ago)
Well if she retains the rights to their work, she's making money from their work in future, and denying them the opportunity to do so. Powerful entity making money while denying less powerful entity the opportunity to, when the 'work' was by the less powerful entity = close enough for discussion, I think.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 10:05 (ten years ago)
But apparently the contract doesn't say what he thinks it does at all, anyway: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/taylor-swift-hits-back-at-photographer-who-accused-her-of-hypocrisy-after-apple-protest-10338309.html
Legalese is the real enemy here, I suspect.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 10:23 (ten years ago)
that any photographer shooting 'The 1989 World Tour' has the opportunity for further use of said photographs with management's approval.
So if you want to sell or license a photo you took, to a paper or magazine or for a book or in a gallery or to a website, you need their permission first? I'd say that's tantamount to transfer of rights ownership, since it limits what you can do with your work. I suppose you can argue that Swift Inc. is not directly profiting off of the work of others, the way Apple tried, but indirectly she definitely is. That's why they allow photography at all, because Swift Inc. benefits. Such an onerous contract is well within her rights, and I imagine relatively common at that level, but it's still pretty lame.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 12:40 (ten years ago)
having administered such contracts, it is relatively common with artists of all stripes and the more independent they are, the more likely they are to clamp down in that way.
― like a giraffe of nah (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 23 June 2015 13:01 (ten years ago)
tay's concert was a lot of fun, tracklist posted above seems more or less correct. worth seeing, if you have like-minded friends.
what I didn't like: in between songs there are a few BS movies of swift's supermodel friends explaining love and friendship etc. to the younger audience. so far so good, but at some point they pretend that taylor's circle of friends is all about food and eating copious amounts of pizza -- as if teenage girls have never heard of anorexia.
― Sharkie, Tuesday, 23 June 2015 22:30 (ten years ago)
well it took me like eight months but now I finally realise that the title 'Style' is perhaaaps a reference to Harry 'Styles' (hidden in plain sight or I'm just dense as fuck)
― Merdeyeux, Thursday, 25 June 2015 11:30 (ten years ago)
i've spent 8 months trying to put that out of my head
― lex pretend, Thursday, 25 June 2015 12:16 (ten years ago)
I always think of the Lemonheads. Like maybe it's somehow a song about smoking crack.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tw8jOyzomU
― how's life, Thursday, 25 June 2015 12:38 (ten years ago)
miss when they were together. best power couple.
― Nourry, Thursday, 25 June 2015 12:59 (ten years ago)
Taylor Swift’s mega-selling 1989 album continues to be unstoppable. The set has now surpassed 5 million in U.S. sales, according to Nielsen Music, making it the fastest seller to reach that plateau in more than 10 years.
1989 crossed the 5 million mark in the week ending July 5, with another 26,000 sold (its total now stands at 5.015 million). The album reaches the milestone in only its 36th week of release -- the speediest climb to 5 million since the week ending Aug. 1, 2004, when Usher’s Confessions hit 5 million in only its 19th week on sale.
Taylor Swift's 'Blank Space' the Fastest Video to Reach 1 Billion Views on Vevo
1989 is Swift’s third album to sell 5 million copies, following Fearless (released in 2008) and her self-titled debut (released in 2006). They've sold 6.95 million and 5.52 million, respectively, to-date.
This is also the most recently released album to sell 5 million since Adele’s 21 powered through 5 million in its 42nd week (Dec. 11, 2011); 21 has sold 11.1 million.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 July 2015 13:44 (ten years ago)
I remember speculation here a couple years ago before 21 did it about whether Confessions would be the last new album certified diamond.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 July 2015 13:45 (ten years ago)
Surprised Red is her 4th best selling, with all the Martin-singles and whatnot - maybe it just seemed like her breakthrough in Denmark
― niels, Thursday, 9 July 2015 13:49 (ten years ago)
I'm surprised that her first two albums have outsold Red. I know they've had longer to do it, but I would have expected Red's crossover to trump them.
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 9 July 2015 14:16 (ten years ago)
xpost!
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 9 July 2015 14:18 (ten years ago)
Country fans buy/bought music.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 July 2015 14:28 (ten years ago)
The same way box office receipts are sometimes adjusted for inflation to show that Gone with the Wind is still bigger than Iron Man 3, album sales need a benchmark because 5m in 2015 is way more of an achievement than 5m in 2008, let alone in 1998. It's obviously not the case that Red was a career dip - more that 1989 is a phenomenon.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Thursday, 9 July 2015 15:01 (ten years ago)
Five million is a big fuckin' deal in 2015.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 July 2015 15:02 (ten years ago)
Sounds like pulling out Spotify was a very smart move.
― Van Horn Street, Thursday, 9 July 2015 17:51 (ten years ago)
the girl plays the modern game brilliantly.
i dont like a lot of her music, but i still think she is fantastic.
the story of the donation to the fan who cannot go to her gig due to chemo is a genuinely 'bloody hell, that's cool'.
the only downside : calvin harris !!?
― mark e, Thursday, 9 July 2015 18:09 (ten years ago)
yeah at this point you have to be very cynical to root against her success.
― Van Horn Street, Friday, 10 July 2015 01:44 (ten years ago)
no idea what it would be now, but i remember that in 2005 the handicap was to triple units shifted. so, an album that sold 700,000 copies in '05 would be the equivalent of double platinum a decade prior. don't remember the source, but i do remember i read it in a rivers cuomo interview. :B so it was probably courtesy of billboard or the RIAA, somebody like that
― soyrev, Friday, 10 July 2015 04:00 (ten years ago)
i think the only bum note of this campaign is all of the awful fashion model hangers on that seem to be part of it... if part of your vibe has alwaysbeen to push yourself as a relatively unjudgement 'uncool' role model/best friends for teens, adding on these semi-anorexic douches that do very little butmake teen girls feel like shit about themselves in the long run seems a pretty tacky move
― jamiesummerz, Friday, 10 July 2015 09:42 (ten years ago)
Obviously I'm not her target market so I wonder what younger fans make of this foregrounding of celebrity pals. It comes off as smug and distancing to me but maybe it works.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Saturday, 11 July 2015 11:08 (ten years ago)
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 11 July 2015 17:26 (ten years ago)
you young people and your celebrities
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 11 July 2015 17:50 (ten years ago)
I was at the show last night (a friend's idea). The love Taylor's fans have for her is incredible to see. It also was cool how she seemed to know her audience - the motivational speeches in between songs didn't do much for me but offered (mostly) solid advice for her young fans. There were also like video segments where Haim and Lena Dunham talked about what it's like to be friends with Taylor Swift. Felt a little envious.
― Treeship, Monday, 13 July 2015 01:07 (ten years ago)
http://gawker.com/taylor-swift-is-not-your-friend-1717745581
problematizing swift
― davey, Wednesday, 22 July 2015 19:42 (ten years ago)
swift problematizes herself
― dyl, Wednesday, 22 July 2015 21:45 (ten years ago)
Problematizing Swift in the same shitty way that's been done since her debut. Nothing new.
I find it funny with this latest misstep of hers on twitter that some people go "oh, finally an in to take down the perfect, invincible Taylor Swift" -- she's been relentlessly attacked and sniped at since her first release from every possible camp for everything she's done. She's also enormously successful. But she's certainly not been some holy cow who's been spared by the media, think piece warriors, social media, gliding unopposed through her career. She was 'feminism's worst nightmare' a couple of album eras ago.
― abcfsk, Wednesday, 22 July 2015 21:55 (ten years ago)
― davey, Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:42 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i think gawker went too far this time
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Thursday, 23 July 2015 04:41 (ten years ago)
The "best friend" schtick is intended for tweens. I don't think it's even that cynical since her success is built on the fact that she writes songs that relate to her very young fans' experiences.
― Treeship, Thursday, 23 July 2015 05:02 (ten years ago)
There's a lot of fans who buy into that "I'm yr friend" crap who're much older than that, tho
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Thursday, 23 July 2015 05:22 (ten years ago)
Yeah not a fan of these articles where the author thinks he/she is putting forth a profound insight when really it's something most people already know but don't bother saying so as not to be a jerk.
― Adam J Duncan, Thursday, 23 July 2015 05:37 (ten years ago)
honestly the mercenary / commercially aware elements of taylor are absolutely part of her package and what people enjoy. the calculatedness is impressive on purpose.
and then there's that taylor's interactions with superfans have been really smart and different compared to lots of other artists, but it seems like the article doesn't even take that into account, if only to dismiss it.
it's sort of just like "generic popstar thinkpiece madlibs".
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Thursday, 23 July 2015 05:49 (ten years ago)
It doesn't make any sense, she is friends with these models and celebrities, and her stuff is all about celebrating friendship, so why can't she have her famous friends on stage?
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 23 July 2015 05:51 (ten years ago)
of the many ways in which t-swift has cluelessly problematised herself, taking issue with her female friends and not promoting female astrophysicists (?!?!) is a strange angle indeed
i blame lena dunham for everything
― lex pretend, Thursday, 23 July 2015 07:08 (ten years ago)
i don't feel exactly like this but many things in this piece by a t-swift megafan ring true: http://www.gonetodeadlock.com/2015/07/my-resignation-letter-from-being-taylor.html?m=1
― lex pretend, Thursday, 23 July 2015 07:10 (ten years ago)
I used to always defend Taylor whenever anyone said anything bad about her. Then for a while I learnt to just say nothing. But now there is nothing I can do other than admit that she is not the person I used to be a fan of.
That's an accurate description of something most music fans are probably familiar with. Also, the link to the Vox piece explaining what happened on Twitter was quite informative http://www.vox.com/2015/7/21/9012179/taylor-swift-nicki-minaj-twitter
― niels, Thursday, 23 July 2015 09:03 (ten years ago)
Her albums were my breakfast, lunch, and dinner - every song has its own set of personal memories attached. I own hundreds of pounds worth of largely pointless Taylor Swift merchandise. I know every word to every song she's ever recorded. I have playlists of pensive Swift, playlists of angry Swift, playlists of my-first-crush Swift, playlists of falling-in-love Swift.
― you are extreme, Patti LuPone. (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 23 July 2015 14:58 (ten years ago)
Their albums were my breakfast, lunch, and dinner - every song has its own set of personal memories attached. I own hundreds of pounds worth of largely pointless Phish merchandise. I know every word to every song she's ever recorded. I have playlists of pensive Phish, playlists of angry Phish, playlists of my-first-crush Phish, playlists of falling-in-love Phish.
― how's life, Thursday, 23 July 2015 15:23 (ten years ago)
this is pretty lolzy http://defamer.gawker.com/taylor-swift-has-no-concept-of-money-1687778173
― davey, Friday, 24 July 2015 03:32 (ten years ago)
In the name of God, no more of this. I don't know what the last three paragraphs think they're doing. As if having a showboating male guitarist, like 90% of arena pop acts, is a betrayal of feminism.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Friday, 24 July 2015 13:07 (ten years ago)
i love this album, love hearing these songs everywhere, glad she's made a billion dollars
i feel like they could juice this for singles for another solid year
― flopson, Friday, 24 July 2015 13:13 (ten years ago)
that "taylor swift has no concept of money" article is one despicable thing (and I don't even like/care for taylor swift !).makes you want to hit whoever wrote that with a glove.
― AlXTC from Paris, Friday, 24 July 2015 13:52 (ten years ago)
xp I agree with a lot of that, Lex, at least until the last line.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Friday, 24 July 2015 15:25 (ten years ago)
In the future we will all be best friends with Taylor Swift for 15 minutes.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 24 July 2015 17:28 (ten years ago)
that "no concept of money" thing wasn't a hitpiece i thought -- just some total silliness in the midst of a bunch of stories about TS's entertaining and unpredictable interactions with fans.
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Friday, 24 July 2015 17:30 (ten years ago)
And there's more. The expectations heaped on Swift are getting ridiculous. Bet Katy Perry's sitting back laughing. "Nobody expects me to say a damn thing about feminism."
http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/07/yes-white-people-it-is-about-you.html?mid=twitter_nymag
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Friday, 24 July 2015 18:47 (ten years ago)
Friends, come to this side, the side of 'I've only enjoyed Taylor Swift through her albums and it took me 1 year to make the connection between Styles and Style by then it was too late' we are all happy and numb to the thinkpieces and what is twitter there's no time for twitter there's only out of the woods.
― Van Horn Street, Friday, 24 July 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)
More seriously, that level of scrutiny and the unrealistic demands on female pop stars are really just an extension of patriarchy and it's getting on my nerves. As it was said above, what hasn't been said of Taylor yet?
― Van Horn Street, Friday, 24 July 2015 18:55 (ten years ago)
eats babies
― j., Friday, 24 July 2015 18:56 (ten years ago)
racistly
Hall & Oates, one of the best-selling duos of the rock era, picked up an award for lifetime achievement on Tuesday, but not before frontman Daryl Hall rebuked producer Kenneth "Babyface" Edmonds for praising the combo's "blue-eyed soul."
"Soul music is not about race," Hall said, after he and partner John Oates were presented with Icon Awards during performing rights group BMI's annual Pop Music Awards ceremony. "There ain't no 'blue-eyed soul' ... Keep that in mind, OK?"
Minutes earlier, Edmonds had performed the duo's tune "Sara Smile" after jokingly recounting his youthful assumption that "blue-eyed soul" -- an approbatory term used to describe soulful white singers -- meant "black guys with blue eyes."
obv daryl hall v babyface in 2008 isn't like 10% of taylor v nicki's click potential in 2015, and the media's obv on alert anyway, but daryl hall's said shit like this for years with minimal backlash
― da croupier, Friday, 24 July 2015 19:13 (ten years ago)
not to say people shouldn't note swift providing a sterling example of a shitty defense mechanism, but that if we ARE going to rake her over the coals, we should raise the bar on the whole
― da croupier, Friday, 24 July 2015 19:14 (ten years ago)
meant to write "the media's obv more on alert" for this kind of thing than they were in '08
― da croupier, Friday, 24 July 2015 19:15 (ten years ago)
she apologized
― nose, Friday, 24 July 2015 19:22 (ten years ago)
if you don't think it's hilarious to make fun of taylor swift for giving some fan $90 to go to chipotle idk what to tell you
― J0rdan S., Friday, 24 July 2015 19:43 (ten years ago)
Note: Taylor Swift allegedly told the fan to go "somewhere nice," after handing over the cash
― curmudgeon, Friday, 24 July 2015 19:54 (ten years ago)
reminds me of that scene in Prizzi's Honor when Angelica Huston hands over crisp benny after another to the stripper, closes her hand around them, and says, "Now get yahself somethin' nice."
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 July 2015 20:00 (ten years ago)
i once failed a job interview at chipotle because i failed to give the impression i thought chipotle was the kind of place someone (not taylor swift specifically) could plausibly mean by "somewhere nice"
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Friday, 24 July 2015 20:01 (ten years ago)
Well, Chipotle is "nice" to *someone*.
― self-clowning oven (Murgatroid), Friday, 24 July 2015 21:10 (ten years ago)
It's sometimes nice for me
― you are extreme, Patti LuPone. (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 25 July 2015 03:38 (ten years ago)
I feel like a lot of these "Taylor swift is Problematic" pieces are really just channeling frustration that the writer has to write about swift or Beyoncé or etc. for clicks. Twenty years ago such writers would have been safely ignoring Celibe Dion or the Spice Girls or TLC, but the realities of music and cultural criticism have shifted. So as usual people blame the wrong thing - the music and the artists - for what are really structural changes in the way media is consumed.
Ironically these writers can spend three thousand words congratulating themselves for not being taken in by the new hegemony when in fact they are its most pure expression.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 04:33 (ten years ago)
Twenty years ago such writers would have been safely ignoring Celine Dion or the Spice Girls or TLC, but the realities of music and cultural criticism have shifted.
I've tried on a few occasions to argue that something very basic has changed with music writers the past two or three years. I'm always told that no, nothing really has changed. The explanations vary, but usually it's a litany of all the critics over the years who championed or at least paid attention to pop music, going back to Greg Shaw and even earlier. That's all true--and still, I'll counter, something has changed.
Your one sentence sums up very succinctly the point I've tried to make. Just as a description--I'm not even addressing the good, bad, or otherwise of it.
― clemenza, Saturday, 25 July 2015 04:50 (ten years ago)
It's amazing to me that anyone in music criticism would deny there has been a change.
I should note I don't think it's *all* negative. There was a lot less space to write about feminism or race issues in the past I think, for example; the topics of conversation were kept more separate. But the price of discursive interpenetration is a shift to the middle ground in terms of what gets mixed and matched with what.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 04:59 (ten years ago)
Yeah, I think it's only relatively recently that publications have figured out that writing about super-popular things will attract page views from outside their core readership. Or else publications without discernible focuses have sprung up to take advantage of those opportunities. Which is to say: everyone writes about super-popular things because it doesn't matter what kind of take it is: positive, negative, who cares, it says "taylor swift" a bunch of times. I do think that there's a generational swing that's been in effect for at least a decade, maybe a decade and a half, that's more sympathetic to pop music because of how the Internet and file-sharing and streaming leveled genres and scenes and put everything on the same playlist, but that's been a more gradual process, obviously.
― jaymc, Saturday, 25 July 2015 05:31 (ten years ago)
Yeah but I think it's not just about how music is consumed but how taste is performed socially: one of the things that social media does is that it reminds you that everyone around you is talking about culture constantly whether or not they share your taste. Whereas before you would tend only to come into contact with conversations of people in tribes to which you belong. The consequence of this is that those tribal affiliations and borders seem much more porous: a link to some NPR stream of a new album from an obscure indie band sits right above an article about Beyonce's new jeans.
On Facebook or Twitter, say, a social network around a given user is much more likely to be diverse in terms of musical taste than in terms of political or ideological alignment, so it makes sense that the kind of criticism that gets consumed and shared within that network (a) speaks much more to the kind of political values that tend to unite that network (noting of course that each individual is at the centre of their own subtly different network) than was the case twenty years ago, and (b) chooses as the cultural object for discussion performers regarding whom the largest number of network members will have an opinion one way or another.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 05:45 (ten years ago)
Great analysis.
― jaymc, Saturday, 25 July 2015 05:46 (ten years ago)
Worth noting that music crit always took political positions (even if implied) but they're more likely to be explicit in the headline now.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 05:47 (ten years ago)
Thanks jaymc
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 06:09 (ten years ago)
Anyway at heart this is my beef with all the people who complain that "poptimism has gone too far", which is basically like thinking that global warming is caused by people turning on heaters (which, it is, but not in the straightforward way that implies; it's caused by air conditioners too!). And those people are basically perpetuating the worst qualities of the very discursive shift they dislike but misunderstand, by lecturing others that their taste is wrong, which is basically having your cake (getting in your click ready references to Taylor) and eating it too (pretending to "see through" the demands of cultural imperialism). All of which is an elaborate distraction from what is really going on in music criticism, and one that I would say is almost cynical, albeit unwittingly so, because it is precisely the exponents of concern trolling and outrage culture who find themselves afforded with a ready pulpit under the aegis of the new status quo.
― Tim F, Saturday, 25 July 2015 06:19 (ten years ago)
http://41.media.tumblr.com/f116f0f99db46b5a61e86d0d4abc1b04/tumblr_nrz77gZRiQ1rsdg3xo1_500.png
― Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 25 July 2015 06:57 (ten years ago)
Yeah, I think it's only relatively recently that publications have figured out that writing about super-popular things will attract page views from outside their core readership.
10 years ago it was a huge struggle to write about pop and r&b bc editors assumed that pop and r&b audiences didn't want to read broadsheet-style music criticism - i mean, they literally said this. now it's a struggle to write about anyone who isn't a big name, either in the megastar sense or in the "established in your publication's demographic" sense.
yeah and of course the savvy artists - like taylor and nicki! - take full advantage of these structural changes. though much of the time whatever the artist has just done is little more than a convenient peg to talk about the wider point the writer wants to talk about regardless of the details of what's just happened - having to peg everything to the past 24 hours is frustrating to read, pitch and write. but it feels like there's little engagement with artists except via what they represent culturally. of course i want to read a smart article on taylor, nicki, race and feminism but it could be fantastic if it actually dug deep into their discographies and their artistic evolutions rather than being pegged around two of their least interesting videos just bc they both happened to be on twitter that night
― lex pretend, Saturday, 25 July 2015 08:31 (ten years ago)
top 5 nicki videos
1) the boys2) stupid hoe3) lookin' ass4) i am your leader5) massive attack
topthe only two taylor videos that don't make me cringe on any level
1) blank space2) you belong with me
― lex pretend, Saturday, 25 July 2015 08:33 (ten years ago)
it feels like there's little engagement with artists except via what they represent culturally
That's because they're not music critics. They're not that interested in music. I am so I find them a drag.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Saturday, 25 July 2015 11:04 (ten years ago)
same, but the context is that the history of music criticism has been terrible at engaging with race, gender and sexuality issues even as they pertain to the music, and many music critics are still reluctant to do that (or worse straight-up ignorant about those issues). so a corrective was sorely necessary. but it's very limited atm, though i guess those non-music critics would argue that what they focus on is more important generally
― lex pretend, Saturday, 25 July 2015 15:19 (ten years ago)
it's also depressing that a lot of writers seem to automatically equate success with greatness. "anaconda" was a great video because it got lots of youtube views and spawned memes? c'mon.
― lex pretend, Saturday, 25 July 2015 15:22 (ten years ago)
those non-music critics would argue that what they focus on is more important generally
Then they should write about the issues and leave the music out of it. If you're into social justice first and foremost then there are bigger fish to fry than Taylor Swift videos. I just think that whatever you choose to write about you should do it properly and, as you often say Lex, engage with the text itself, not just the debate around it.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Saturday, 25 July 2015 15:37 (ten years ago)
yeah i think we're largely on the same page - i would mostly blame the 24-hour turnaround culture and the collapsing of boundaries between fields of writing as tim pointed out though, which is on editors rather than writers. and i do think talking about social justice as it pertains to the music is necessary, and has occasionally even been done well.
― lex pretend, Saturday, 25 July 2015 15:49 (ten years ago)
Lex, didn't Minaj make p much that argument on behalf of Anaconda herself? Regardless they're both crappy songs w awful videos, which made this hard to care abt for me, even for a Twitter furore. Mostly I just hope 7/11 wins, cos it's way sexier than Anaconda and (presumably) WAY cheaper than Bad Blood, and WAY WAY better than either. Bad Blood'll prob win tho, precisely due to the stupid amt of money/ pointless celeb cameos/halfassed "filmic" values etc
― sonic thedgehod (albvivertine), Sunday, 26 July 2015 10:33 (ten years ago)
"Feeling Myself" is better than all 3.
― billstevejim, Sunday, 26 July 2015 14:57 (ten years ago)
the problem with nearly all these thinkpieces is they ask you to put yourself in some sort alignment with the artist like listening is endorsement of whatever particular reading they have, which is usually like "is it subverted" or "double subversive" or "we thought it was subversive but now it is problematized" and all of which are skin-deep as heck because either they assume that the artist can't be doing multiple things at once or that the audience is only capable of understanding a single thing at once. so you have all these tracks and albums that play on tensions and suspension and complexity, and then the "critical response" is immediately to collapse this onto "but is is it real 'girl power'"? like "real girl power" is a thing that we can expect artists to produce and be meaningful as such.
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 15:21 (ten years ago)
no, guys, actually taylor swift is problematic as a feminist role model
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 26 July 2015 15:33 (ten years ago)
also she's not that good at writing songs
Taylor's songs are good and she seems to be, intriguingly, both genuinely nice and utterly ruthless. I'd vote for her for president (assuming she shares my basic policy positions - i have no idea)
― Treeship, Sunday, 26 July 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, July 26, 2015 11:33 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
haters gonna hate, also youre wrong
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 26 July 2015 15:58 (ten years ago)
While cooking dinner and jamming out to my T Swift Pandora station after work last night, these lyrics (ones I hadn't ever heard before) started playing, lyrics so pretty that I almost entirely forgot about my bubbling pasta and just... listened. Almost every Taylor Swift song revolves around dating relationships, but this song focuses on a completely different (and completely awesome) relationship - one with little baby girls - and although it may not be explicitly pro-life, she recognizes the sweet innocence of early life so beautifully that it's close enough for me!
Another reason I am so drawn to this song is because sometimes I feel a number of Kindergarten, 1st grade, and 2nd grade girls are pressured to think and act and dress years older than they actually are. This is a trend I've noticed not only from reality shows such as Toddlers & Tiaras, but also at times when I assisted little miss pageant contestants as a former county queen. So it's pretty cool that Taylor Swift realizes how essential it is for girls to take their time in growing up, time to be crazy and carefree.
And yet, I also love Swift's song because it reminds us that part of "never growing up" is not just for kids, but adults as well. To have their same sweet, innocent, and faithful spirit. To love as if we've never been scarred or hurt. Most of all, this message is often reflected in one of the Catholic Church's most prominent Bible verses - Matthew 18:3 - "Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven."
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 26 July 2015 15:59 (ten years ago)
who decided that a good conversation to have about every woman artist is "are they a good feminist role model" whatever the heck that means.
taylor swift is a terrible feminist role model because you aspire to be like your role models and nobody can aspire to be like taylor swift because it is basically impossible.
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:03 (ten years ago)
also are you seriously arguing that good music should be unlikable by people with values different than yours? at that point you're one step away from saying "bad music is music that has values i disapprove of" and then what are you left listening to?
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:04 (ten years ago)
i got swervedriver and skrewdriver confused once
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:07 (ten years ago)
Aside from completely misconstruing the lyrics, why does it matter what Taylor Swift writes about? Here is a self-made woman, someone who has built a career for herself, and done it in a classy, age-appropriate manner. For most rational, normal people, Taylor Swift is considered a role model. But it’s not good enough for the feminazis. Heaven forbid someone writes songs about their own feelings without consulting the fascist feminists about whether or not it’s considered Feminist Approved.
Feministing also jumped on the anti-Taylor Swift bandwagon, because Taylor Swift — a woman — is somehow “sexist.” And the reason that she is sexist is because a few femisogynists decided that the message of her music is somehow bad. Traditional love and romance is considered the most sexist thing ever when it comes to these enlightened beings. (After all, why should a woman be in a traditional, loving, respectful relationship?) When you consider that, as stated before, most of Swift’s songs are autobiographical, as in, based on her own experiences in relationships, it’s even more ridiculous. The feminazis claim that the issue is that music should speak to people, but obviously her music does speak to people, or she wouldn’t be selling millions and millions of albums. The issue here isn’t that women and girls don’t empathize with Taylor Swift’s lyrics, it’s that the feminazis want to decide what kind of relationships are sexist and not sexist.
The issue here is not about Taylor Swift. It’s about the monster that these feminazis have turned feminism into. Equality has gone completely out the window. It’s just like how pro-abortion advocates call themselves “pro-choice”. It isn’t about women deciding what choices to make for themselves. Taylor Swift, for example, is a successful, independent, wealthy woman who has accomplished so much at an incredibly young age. But because certain women who have hijacked the term feminist don’t like what she sings about, she’s automatically labeled as sexist and anti-feminist. Wouldn’t equality mean that a woman could choose to write whatever kind of music she wanted to write about… and that women could choose to listen to whatever kind of music they like? Feminism is not about a litmus test for how a woman lives her life, and it isn’t a list of rules. Feminism is about equality… something that the women who claim to be fighting for women’s right threw out the window a long time ago.
these are fascinating and valuable opinions
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:11 (ten years ago)
they make this thread a better place
is it actually possible to have an interesting opinion on taylor swift tho
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:16 (ten years ago)
"is it actually possible to have an interesting opinion"
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:32 (ten years ago)
idk, down with opinions. up with music crit.
― where the sterls have no name (s.clover), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:33 (ten years ago)
http://images.j-14.com/uploads/photos/file/9079/ed-sheeran-taylor-swift-3.jpg
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:41 (ten years ago)
I need to write a think piece about someone using "feminazi" in 2015.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 26 July 2015 16:47 (ten years ago)
"bad music is music that has values i disapprove of"
This is actually a thing now btw
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 15:34 (ten years ago)
you mean non-musical values I take it?
― droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 27 July 2015 15:37 (ten years ago)
yes they just invented that, it's amazing, our modern day
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)
if you had told our grandparents that in the future there would be people who thought music that prioritized sounds and messages they disapproved as was "bad" it would blow their minds
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 15:49 (ten years ago)
messages they disapproved of
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 15:50 (ten years ago)
a lot of this is just a natural effect of music criticism becoming a more generalist subject, performed by more generalist writers. there might be things to say about this! but the problem is that people who criticize this model are walking a fine line between doing that and ranting about social justice warriors
― for sale: baby shoes, never worn your ass (katherine), Monday, 27 July 2015 15:52 (ten years ago)
also i think music fans didn't spend a lot of time reading generalist articles in generalist magazines and therefore didn't spend as much time going "what is to be done with newsweek, i ask you"
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 15:53 (ten years ago)
xp Ha, OK. It has always been a thing but it's enjoying a resurgence.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:05 (ten years ago)
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:07 (ten years ago)
bait aint gonna click itself
― j., Monday, 27 July 2015 16:09 (ten years ago)
In the 60s you had to subscribe to certain journals to read terrible, simplistic political analysis (on left and right) of rock'n'roll. Now it's everywhere. So's the good stuff but the ratio's off.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:14 (ten years ago)
William F. Buckley Jr.Boston GlobeSept. 13, 1964
The Beatles are not merely awful; I would consider it sacrilegious to say anything less than that they are god awful. They are so unbelievably horribly, so appallingly unmusical, so dogmatically insensitive to the magic of the art that they qualify as crowned heads of anti-music, even as the imposter popes went down in history as "anti-popes."
The NationMarch 2, 1964
The reaction [to the Beatles] at Carnegie Hall was not a real response to a real stimulus.... The full house was made up largely of upper-middle-class young ladies, stylishly dressed, carefully made up, brought into town by private cars or suburban buses for their night to howl, to let go, scream, bump, twist and clutch themselves ecstatically out there in the floodlights for everyone to see and with the full blessings of all authority; indulgent parents, profiteering businessmen, gleeful national media, even the police. Later they can all go home and grow up like their mommies, but this was their chance to attempt a very safe and very private kind of rapture.
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:29 (ten years ago)
anti-popes in quotation marks is a nice touch
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:31 (ten years ago)
hey, those are "certain journals"! and indeed now it's "everywhere" but that's because of tech
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 16:50 (ten years ago)
it takes discipline to ignore unrewarding strains of conversation now and clearly anybody posting here isn't good about that
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 16:52 (ten years ago)
Yes of course it's down to tech. And yes of course I'm bad at ignoring that stuff, but that's partly because there's so little editorial discretion. I don't go combing Tumblr for bad writing but it's in the Guardian, Pitchfork, New York, etc etc. It's an economic phenomenon as much as a cultural one - the business of hot takes. There's a disincentive to be choosy.
I've read a lot of hostile 60s articles about the Beatles btw, from the ones that slammed them for being communists to the ones that slammed them for not being communists.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 16:58 (ten years ago)
def not denying it's a rough time to go seeking information and opinion about pop culture as the easiest way to seek it is to crowdsource from a large, high pressure pool where the shit rises, but grumbling about how pop critics are a bunch of politically-obsessed scenester know-nothings today still strikes me as odd cuz i'm not aware of a time where that wasn't the critique
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 17:05 (ten years ago)
That's not what I was saying. I wasn't even talking about music critics. But you really don't think there are a lot more of these pieces than there were 10 years ago?
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 17:13 (ten years ago)
I align with something I heard Wesley Morris say on a podcast the other day: I'm glad lots of writers are thinking about politics in pop culture. I just wish the quality was higher.
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 17:16 (ten years ago)
But you really don't think there are a lot more of these pieces than there were 10 years ago?
i just find it hard to distinguish between "there is more" and "i'm seeing a lot more" when my method of seeing them has changed so dramatically. and i dunno how you're distinguishing between music critics and general writers what have you, but the critique of people writing about music has always been that they're shitty writers focused on a grander story and ignoring "the music".
― da croupier, Monday, 27 July 2015 17:22 (ten years ago)
I don't think we're even dealing with the same premises here. But nbd
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Monday, 27 July 2015 17:30 (ten years ago)
my main issue with these kinds of pieces it that they seem to pigeonhole female and minority artists as being either "part of the problem" or "part of the solution." the artist is either accused of "reproducing" hegemonic cultural forms or "resisting" them, but in either case their success or failure is judged according to their usefulness to a political project they in many cases never ascribed to. male artists are never scrutinized in this way when they, like taylor swift, write songs about relationships or being famous or whatever.
― Treeship, Monday, 27 July 2015 18:29 (ten years ago)
it's definitely possible to learn things about our culture's attitudes toward gender by teasing apart the semiotics of a taylor swift video, but this sort of cultural studies approach seems like it would work better if the goal wasn't to come to a conclusion, at the end, as to whether the thing is "good" or "bad." first of all, the point of her songs isn't to overturn hegemonic norms and tbh, why should she want to? this society has been good to taylor. she is obviously blinded by privileged and largely apolitical and everything else, but she also writes songs that are meaningful to people whose taste has often been overlooked or demeaned by the critical establishment (i.e. young girls) so i for one would never say that she is bad for america.
― Treeship, Monday, 27 July 2015 18:35 (ten years ago)
I think it's about misplaced expectation. She identifies as a feminist, ergo she must be judged as a good or bad feminist. There's a version of that with male musicians who identify as left-wing, although it's not as prevalent at the moment. I tend to judge pop stars as pop stars and give them a lot of leeway if they attempt anything beyond that. I liked this piece on Noisey yesterday:
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/why-do-songs-by-female-pop-stars-always-need-to-have-a-feminist-message
― A swarm of antipathy (Re-Make/Re-Model), Tuesday, 28 July 2015 13:39 (ten years ago)
So uhm, how are we interpreting the melodic similarities between "Bad Blood"/"These Words"/"Fancy", "Blank Space"/"Wasn't Me" and (to my ears, at least) the coda of "Style"/"Shake it Out"? Is it clever referencing, unoriginal songwriting, simply how pop works? Is it like the "Crimson & Clover" chords showing up in so many rock songs?
For some reason I feel a bit like the commenters on this youtube-video:
Thank god someone finally did a video on this!!!
Exactly. Drives me crazy.
I knew that bad blood sounds like an another song, i googled it to just find out the name of the song "this word", i coundn't recall the name
https://youtu.be/U94rcoftm4c
― niels, Thursday, 30 July 2015 17:40 (ten years ago)
eh?
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Thursday, 30 July 2015 17:54 (ten years ago)
Yeah I mean it's not the huge hooks and it's not like "Heartbeat Song" / "The Middle", but still I'm... I dunno, I just hear it and wonder - why did Taylor and Max use a melodic line from a 2000 Shaggy smash hit? Because it's fun, because it doesn't matter, because it's clever, because they didn't think about it?
― niels, Thursday, 30 July 2015 17:57 (ten years ago)
The song that keeps popping in my head when thinking about "Bad Blood" is Katy Perry's ET, and subsequently Tatu's All the Things She Said.
― MarkoP, Thursday, 30 July 2015 19:15 (ten years ago)
TaTu rules all those other songs.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 30 July 2015 20:04 (ten years ago)
I think Bad Blood sounds very Lorde. But yeah, it sounds like lots of other stuff, too.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 July 2015 20:18 (ten years ago)
This seems like the best idea Ryan Adams has had in 15 or 20 years.
http://pitchfork.com/news/60703-ryan-adams-says-hes-recording-1989-cover-album-taylor-swift-says-i-will-pass-out/
― something totally new, it’s the AOR of the twenty first century (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 6 August 2015 14:04 (ten years ago)
ok some of the clips sound AMAZING plus
http://cdn.pitchfork.com/news/60719/b528e0ec.jpg
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Friday, 7 August 2015 19:05 (ten years ago)
Patiently awaiting the arrival of mine in the post.
― Tim F, Friday, 7 August 2015 21:59 (ten years ago)
a friend of mine got momentarily famous for covering "style" on harp
― flopson, Friday, 7 August 2015 22:32 (ten years ago)
So the cover art in the style of Sonic Youth's "Goo" immediately makes me wonder if he's referencing their old threat of covering The White Album in its entirety. Kind of subtle but cool if he is.
― dlp9001, Saturday, 8 August 2015 01:18 (ten years ago)
Nora LOVES Shake It Off.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 10 August 2015 08:44 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A42LFnMcFao
― how's life, Monday, 17 August 2015 17:25 (ten years ago)
this is one of the funniest things i've ever seen
― J0rdan S., Monday, 17 August 2015 17:26 (ten years ago)
Haha, that's rich
― niels, Monday, 17 August 2015 18:40 (ten years ago)
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:31 PM
yes, one late pass please
― sleeve, Friday, 21 August 2015 00:13 (ten years ago)
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/taylor-swift-is-confusing
this is a weird article. curtis stittenfeld references "BDSM" imagery being part of the 1989 tour which was not something i noticed at all when i saw her in july
― Treeship, Saturday, 5 September 2015 05:04 (ten years ago)
there is something like, super contrived about her trying to appeal to her fans on a personal level that the piece picks up on, but i don't think this is bad. sittenfeld is 40, she can see that taylor is being disingenuous when she tells her fans she appreciates them all individually. most of swift's fans, though, are like 13, and the mere fact that taylor cares enough to try to make it seem like she cares about them as people probably means a lot. taylor knows her constituency and she gives them what they want. she will go far in politics some day
― Treeship, Saturday, 5 September 2015 05:09 (ten years ago)
the designer of that 'goo' shirt showed up in this piece:
http://www.nme.com/features/10-years-on-what-are-the-stars-of-2005-indie-doing-now
plz post your guess which '2005 indie star' it was in this thread before reading
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Saturday, 5 September 2015 05:29 (ten years ago)
Devandra Burnhart?
― how's life, Saturday, 5 September 2015 09:55 (ten years ago)
FYI: those Ryan Adams covers are now on YouTube
― Sharkie, Monday, 21 September 2015 21:57 (ten years ago)
https://www.grammypro.com/professional-development/video/listening-session-taylor-swift-1989-part-1
"There are two albums I think are a little bit patchwork quilty- sonically- and speak now is one we started getting into that. "go , string section!" and then we'd get banjo for the next track."
― abcfsk, Friday, 9 October 2015 07:22 (nine years ago)
plz bump when they do out of the woods
― a literal scarecrow on a quaint porch (forksclovetofu), Friday, 9 October 2015 14:46 (nine years ago)
https://www.grammypro.com/professional-development/video/listening-session-taylor-swift-1989-part-3
― abcfsk, Monday, 12 October 2015 20:53 (nine years ago)
The part in the first video about not winning album of the year for Red is kinda terrifying.
― Tim F, Monday, 12 October 2015 21:11 (nine years ago)
To be fair the gif of her believing her album was being named went viral and got covered everywhere and we know she hangs on to every word written about her.
― abcfsk, Monday, 12 October 2015 21:19 (nine years ago)
the Grammys sure mean a lot to her.
She sounds amazingly composed, as if she'd been revising drafts of the remarks for weeks.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 October 2015 21:33 (nine years ago)
I don't mean terrifying awful, I mean how she explains her resolve afterwards. It's very MJ circa Off The Wall / Thriller.
― Tim F, Monday, 12 October 2015 21:33 (nine years ago)
Yeah it does sound composed. She sounds quite a bit like a professional reviewer at times. Her description of Fearless fees pretty accurate to me.
― Tim F, Monday, 12 October 2015 21:34 (nine years ago)
Strong verbs too! "Some people noted that..."
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 October 2015 21:35 (nine years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHN0ca6lf1c
― Jeff W, Tuesday, 27 October 2015 20:23 (nine years ago)
Josh113723 1 hour ago If you're ever sad, remember that the world is 3 billion years old and you somehow were lucky enough to exist at the same time as princess of pop Taylor Swift!! <3
― a llove spat over a llama-keeper (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 27 October 2015 21:39 (nine years ago)
A year in the top ten this week
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 October 2015 21:41 (nine years ago)
is there an auto-tuned reverb on that live take? kind of weird...good song
― niels, Wednesday, 28 October 2015 15:13 (nine years ago)
whoever was on the soundboard on that live cut certainly earned their pay.she's certainly gotten much better live.
― a llove spat over a llama-keeper (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 28 October 2015 20:02 (nine years ago)
I don't know where else to type about this. I only gave this TS album a once-over listen before deciding it was not for me, happy for her success! but I'm a happy camper with her previous country-gone-Joshua-Tree albums. Only a small tear shed for the banalification of one of my favourite superstars, good for her, hooray!
But the inescapability of "Wildest Dreams" this past month has got me on the hate train. I love Taylor's songwriting, A+ total favourite, but it is so abundantly clear that this chorus was simply not written by her, it is weighted all wrong, it is so obviously written by Max Martin or another non-native English speaker, Taylor pre-"1989" would never have mis-weighted "standing in a NICE dress" or "say you'll see me A-gain", and idk idk I'm not keen to play authenticity Olympics but like, seriously? I love Swift as a songwriter and am just so... frustrated to hear her giving her choruses over to somebody else. (If you wanna tell me TS wrote that chorus, you can, but you're wrong)
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Thursday, 29 October 2015 23:36 (nine years ago)
Meanwhile this thread is all "Wildest Dreams... classic TS!" and I'm wondering holy hell how do you guys not hear the difference between they way TS writes and the way Max Martin writes
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Thursday, 29 October 2015 23:38 (nine years ago)
I think the chorus is the weakest part of that song but the bridge is amazing and pure TS.
― Tim F, Thursday, 29 October 2015 23:47 (nine years ago)
Maybe! Or maybe not. I hate playing "guess the author", esp when it's with one of my favourite pop songwriters :(
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Thursday, 29 October 2015 23:59 (nine years ago)
I generally have an attitude about pop authorship that is like listening to an uncle tell big fish stories, like, "it's so much more fun if you just pretend it's all true," but friggin darn if this song doesn't ruin everything
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Friday, 30 October 2015 00:01 (nine years ago)
when I say "pure TS" I just mean it sounds very her. No idea who actually wrote what.
― Tim F, Friday, 30 October 2015 00:07 (nine years ago)
https://40.media.tumblr.com/fff8392494743e313ee9226f864ab2a1/tumblr_nx4povzyD61rk3uipo1_540.jpg
― how's life, Sunday, 1 November 2015 12:09 (nine years ago)
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Thursday, October 29, 2015 11:36 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i don't like this song but i think this happened because whoever responsible was half-consciously rewriting 'video games' and i am willing to believe that was swift
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Sunday, 1 November 2015 13:47 (nine years ago)
a max martin question: what was he doing between 2000 and 2008? as per this article he seems to have had a bit of an off decade:
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/6656874/max-martin-new-no-1-billboard-hot-100-the-weeknd
Max Martin's Hot 100 No. 1s as a SongwriterBritney Spears, "…Baby One More Time," 1999'NSYNC, "It's Gonna Be Me," 2000Katy Perry, "I Kissed a Girl," 2008Pink, "So What," 2008Kelly Clarkson, "My Life Would Suck Without You," 2009Britney Spears, "3," 2009Katy Perry featuring Snoop Dogg, "California Gurls," 2010Katy Perry, "Teenage Dream," 2010Pink, "Raise Your Glass,"2010Britney Spears, "Hold It Against Me," 2011Katy Perry featuring Kanye West, "E.T.," 2011Katy Perry, "Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.)," 2011Katy Perry, "Part of Me," 2012Maroon 5, "One More Night," 2012Taylor Swift, "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together," 2012Katy Perry, "Roar," 2013Katy Perry featuring Juicy J, "Dark Horse," 2014Taylor Swift, "Shake It Off," 2014Taylor Swift, "Blank Space," 2014Taylor Swift featuring Kendrick Lamar, "Bad Blood," 2015The Weeknd, "Can't Feel My Face," 2015
was there just a bunch of not-quite-hyper-successful stuff? or was he not making records?
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 2 November 2015 02:55 (nine years ago)
iirc he floundered for a bit before hooking up with dr. luke
― james brooks, Monday, 2 November 2015 03:03 (nine years ago)
Since U Been Gone came out in 2004, but was never a number one hit. But I do think there was still a dry period between 2000 and 2004.
― MarkoP, Monday, 2 November 2015 03:52 (nine years ago)
AKA that strange period of time where pop music was dominated by the likes of The Neptunes and The Matrix.
― MarkoP, Monday, 2 November 2015 03:53 (nine years ago)
Looks like he was writing songs for Nick Carter, Celine Dion, Def Leppard, and a bunch of artists I've never heard of. The most successful stuff he did in that period were a few Britney Spears singles like Overprotected and I'm Not a Girl, Not Yet a Woman.
― MarkoP, Monday, 2 November 2015 03:59 (nine years ago)
― MarkoP, Monday, November 2, 2015 3:53 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeahhh this is part of what i was wondering about. whence the return to mainstream pop conservatism?? (ok that is kind of a fake narrative, but, you know what i mean ..)
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 2 November 2015 04:58 (nine years ago)
i'm just finding it harder and harder to reconcile a love for her music/songrwriting/emotion with her horrific public persona and squad situation in 2015
― mingalaba, Monday, 2 November 2015 05:04 (nine years ago)
i'm finding it harder to reconcile a love for her fantastic public persona and squad situation with her horrific music, songwriting, and emotions
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 2 November 2015 05:07 (nine years ago)
she is great and the world is more interesting because of her work
― james brooks, Monday, 2 November 2015 05:17 (nine years ago)
Her "genuine emotional connection w her fans" thing has seemed like a fairly evil way to ensure a super-dedicated fanbase for a while to me
― Underground Rick (albvivertine), Monday, 2 November 2015 05:48 (nine years ago)
What.
― abcfsk, Monday, 2 November 2015 06:24 (nine years ago)
Her "genuine emotional connection w her fans Lena Dunham" thing has seemed like a fairly evil way to ensure a super-dedicated fanbase for a while to me
― Underground Rick (albvivertine), Sunday, November 1, 2015 11:48 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Fixed
― Love, Wilco (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 2 November 2015 06:39 (nine years ago)
ew
― james brooks, Monday, 2 November 2015 06:41 (nine years ago)
this seems a weird contention. taylor swift doesn't need a few (tens of?) thousand(s?) of hyper-dedicated fans, she is not a free-to-play videogame
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Monday, 2 November 2015 13:31 (nine years ago)
Her persona and squad situation is the best thing about her. That and her ruthlessness
― Treeship, Monday, 2 November 2015 13:42 (nine years ago)
Looks like he was writing songs for Nick Carter
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 November 2015 14:24 (nine years ago)
^ Could be a hit today for just about anyone.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 November 2015 14:25 (nine years ago)
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Thursday, October 29, 2015 7:36 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
counterpoint: "lost in YOUR eyes," "swallowing MY pride," etc
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Monday, 2 November 2015 15:13 (nine years ago)
what does "squad situation" mean?
― akm, Monday, 2 November 2015 15:15 (nine years ago)
Taylor had Busta Rhymes on stage and is now and honorary member of the Flipmode Squad.
― how's life, Monday, 2 November 2015 15:26 (nine years ago)
Swift has always been a simple songwriter - simple chords, simple melodies, etc. - so it's sort of hard to discern, but my muso guitar teacher (who also writes jingles and does sessions and stuff) hears a lot in her recent music that resembles a lot of what he's heard on the radio the last couple of years. Kind of these static structures and lazy melodies, with gimmicky ticks (hate hate hate, play play play) a la Katy Perry's "Roar," which is sort of the recent MO of Max Martin and Luke. I def. think Swift brings in a lot of the songs and melodic ideas, plus a ton of lyrics or ideas for lyrics, but what the other guys do to it I don't think improves them. To my ears at least she sounds a lot like she's acting the emotions she's relating rather than feeling them, which gives her music a distancing quality, whereas in the past I think her simplicity and lack of virtuosity made her more appealing. Which is to say she makes an awkward image-conscious Queen of the Universe a la Beyonce or Madonna, though I admit she's doing it her own way, which is if not refreshing, per se, then definitely intriguing. Or, I dunno, perplexing.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 2 November 2015 15:33 (nine years ago)
x post Would love to hear Swift work with the Bomb Squad.
1989!
― MarkoP, Monday, 2 November 2015 15:40 (nine years ago)
i love this post and think about it every time i hear this song now... it hadn't occurred to me that the weighting in NICE dress was off, but yea i guess it is now that you mention it, however the phrase "nice dress" always seemed under-written and vague to me. "Say you'll remember me standing in a nice dress staring at the sunset." like, if you're gonna remember her staring at the sunset, why not also remember the colour of the dress? nice? nice?!!
― flopson, Sunday, 15 November 2015 18:03 (nine years ago)
ctrl-f thread "nice dress", enlightenment yrs
― r|t|c, Sunday, 15 November 2015 18:52 (nine years ago)
It's the way Martin and Swift imagine how guys think. "I'll always remember that girl. She wore, like, a nice dress."
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 15 November 2015 18:55 (nine years ago)
maybe it's rather the way Martin and Swift think her core audience thinks guys think.
― Sharkie, Sunday, 15 November 2015 23:59 (nine years ago)
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:55 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i'd like to think it's intentional in this way but, nah. why add the detail of 'red lips and rosy cheeks' immediately after? the kinda guy who forgets what colour your dress is remembers what makeup you were wearing?
― flopson, Monday, 16 November 2015 00:06 (nine years ago)
I have always had this sense that the lyric as originally written was "standing in a red dress" and they changed it because of the resulting similarity to Lana's "Summertime Sadness" (transposing the "red" to lips instead).
"Standing in a red dress" would flow so much better tonally whereas the way Taylor sings "nice" just sounds jarring in a manner that is out of character for both Swift and Martin.
― Tim F, Monday, 16 November 2015 00:24 (nine years ago)
'white dress' would keep the long syllable, but makes u think of a wedding dress which doesn't make sense in the context of the song
i haven't read this thread from the top but: do we all like this song? i love it
― flopson, Monday, 16 November 2015 00:38 (nine years ago)
i think i had been hearing 'white dress.' wildest dreams: good song!
― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Monday, 16 November 2015 00:59 (nine years ago)
i like that tim f hears it is swift/martin doing ldr as well, albeit a different song
― thwomp (thomp), Monday, 16 November 2015 01:12 (nine years ago)
I don't think the "red dress" resemblance would matter if it didn't already sound like a LDR song (although not specifically that one) for long stretches!
This song is all about bridge tho, and that is really what pushes it into top tier for me.
Although I also love the second verse.
― Tim F, Monday, 16 November 2015 01:47 (nine years ago)
― flopson, Sunday, November 15, 2015 7:06 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
that's part of what i think makes the lyrics of this song really subtle and polyvocal.
its _her_ fantasy of _him_ remembering _her_. like the pathos and anger is in her desire to be remembered, her knowledge this will end, and her pleading to be remembered, or to be promised to be remembered.
its a relationship lived through a polaroid instagram filter from the moment it begins
― big WHOIS aka the nameserver (s.clover), Monday, 16 November 2015 02:42 (nine years ago)
i read that as 'paranoid instagram filter' which hm yes also mb
― thwomp (thomp), Monday, 16 November 2015 02:44 (nine years ago)
It's also an inversion of the lyrics on "Red".
― Tim F, Monday, 16 November 2015 03:53 (nine years ago)
offs: http://exclaim.ca/music/article/taylor_swift_attempts_to_trademark_1989_swiftmas
― Fetty Wap Is Strong In Here (cryptosicko), Friday, 11 December 2015 19:01 (nine years ago)
will this album cycle ever end
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLf9q36UsBk
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Friday, 1 January 2016 21:40 (nine years ago)
What I would like to know is whether or not she's planning on releasing an album this year.
― MarkoP, Friday, 1 January 2016 22:14 (nine years ago)
kinda hope not tbh
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Friday, 1 January 2016 22:16 (nine years ago)
arguably the first good music video she's released in like... 5 years
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 2 January 2016 04:27 (nine years ago)
i) had ughed but tbh i actually kinda forgot how much i enjoyed this tune so ty tay
ii) this was actually v much worth the delayed rollout cos it now sounds awesome with the woods as album campaign, we are now the ones being eternally chased by tay the shapeshifting vulpine demon whose insatiable lust for devotion demands that we are reminded in pitiless clarity of every single life trauma we might have shared with her since 1989 came out
― r|t|c, Saturday, 2 January 2016 04:43 (nine years ago)
remember that meeting when u were a buffoon20 stitches in a conference room
― r|t|c, Saturday, 2 January 2016 04:46 (nine years ago)
yeah same
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Saturday, 2 January 2016 05:26 (nine years ago)
This is my favorite single from the album so far.
― timellison, Saturday, 2 January 2016 05:53 (nine years ago)
it's by far the best song on the album imho
― Does that make you mutter, under your breath, “Damn”? (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 2 January 2016 06:09 (nine years ago)
It's the actually good first volume of song of ice and fire of 1989
― carly rae jetson (thomp), Saturday, 2 January 2016 07:22 (nine years ago)
only cringing bc of bad cgi means it's a step up from taylor's usual video output
honestly surprised more big names didn't do things on xmas dya, boxing day, nye, nyd etc etc; the past logic of everything being shut just doesn't apply, everyone's been in their dressing gowns on the internet for over a week now. plan it around hangovers and you've got a captive audience
― cher guevara (lex pretend), Saturday, 2 January 2016 09:59 (nine years ago)
blank space video still easily the best from this era imo. The dramatic, repetitive falling and clutching in this one just became comical
― art baengels (monotony), Saturday, 2 January 2016 10:55 (nine years ago)
the "Estranged" video premiered 27 months after Use Your Illusion 2's release date.
― billstevejim, Saturday, 2 January 2016 17:46 (nine years ago)
a lot of post-production work on those dolphins
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Saturday, 2 January 2016 18:14 (nine years ago)
actually "out of the woods" could use some hovering cgi dolphins
i guess it's been a while since singles/videos for a blockbuster album extended into a third calendar year. it's truly the '90s again.
― billstevejim, Saturday, 2 January 2016 18:33 (nine years ago)
http://www.godsjukebox.com/phillipsmark/taylor-swift-wildest-dreams-live-solo-guitar/
(Grammy Museum, Sept. 30th)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 6 January 2016 01:24 (nine years ago)
that's a pretty cool live version, great singing and I dig the guitar playing. but overall the performance lacks depth IMHO.
― Sharkie, Wednesday, 6 January 2016 04:44 (nine years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1Zt47V3pPw
looking forward to her post-pop authenticy phase
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Thursday, 7 January 2016 22:32 (nine years ago)
authenticity* ugh
kind of an uncomfortable song to perform probably - so many syllables, you can't really sing them through, run out of breath
I know it's all an 'act', but it really does seem awfully act-y to me - trying too hard to be casual, ends up forced
nice song
― niels, Thursday, 7 January 2016 22:53 (nine years ago)
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson)
yes
― abcfsk, Friday, 8 January 2016 05:34 (nine years ago)
^^ same
― alpine static, Friday, 8 January 2016 09:44 (nine years ago)
Something I always notice in Swift is how comfortable she looks on the stage whenever she's a guitar strapped on. Without one, well, she's improved but she doesn't dance or really move, she looks more like switching from one pose to another, like in a photoshoot. With a guitar she flows so much more naturally (which is to be expected of course, considering her background)
― cpl593H, Friday, 8 January 2016 13:23 (nine years ago)
Looking forward to her post-authenticity disco phase.
― Chewshabadoo, Friday, 8 January 2016 13:37 (nine years ago)
So Taylor was back in her “Pennsylvania hometown” for a wedding and one of my best friends was there with the scoop:
“She is tall as shit. She sang shake it off and blank space at the end but I missed it because I left to go to Taco Bell.”
― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:11 (nine years ago)
damn, priorities
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:15 (nine years ago)
i know, right?
― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:16 (nine years ago)
Well they do have those new Quesalupas.
― MarkoP, Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:18 (nine years ago)
your friend OTM
― its subtle brume (DJP), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:20 (nine years ago)
Why is "Pennsylvania hometown" in quotes? You mean, like, "Reading?"
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:21 (nine years ago)
ha that's how they referred to it on the local news. they weren't my words so
― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Tuesday, 23 February 2016 15:29 (nine years ago)
Surely I can't be the only one who's relieved now the danger of a Swift album produced by Harris has been defused.
― cpl593H, Sunday, 5 June 2016 05:35 (nine years ago)
http://www.people.com/article/taylor-swift-surprises-newlyweds-wedding
― Treeship, Sunday, 5 June 2016 05:42 (nine years ago)
Taylor Swift helped one very happy groom – who's also been a longtime fan of the singer – fill his blank space Saturday night.
maybe a poor choice of words on the part of the people writer. i endorse taylor swift crashing parties though. i feel like she'd be a be a better party crasher than bill murray, who seems to always be drunk/attention seeking
― Treeship, Sunday, 5 June 2016 05:45 (nine years ago)
She's like that Ben Stiller sketch "Legends of Springsteen", only for real.
― cpl593H, Sunday, 5 June 2016 06:49 (nine years ago)
The whole "Calvin is a jerk and btw I wrote his hit" thing is pretty entertaining. It was always so obviously a Taylor song. (Not a very good one but w/e.)
― A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:45 (nine years ago)
Taylor Swift - Speak Now (Oct 2010) - hype, anticipation &c (started by لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend) on board I Love Music on Jul 21, 2010)Taylor Swift - RED - October 22 (started by spanky hotel frogstrot (how's life) on board I Love Music on Aug 14, 2012)Taylor Swift - 1989 (started by lex pretend on board I Love Music on Aug 18, 2014)
Think we're gonna get one this year?
― j.o. seasoning (how's life), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 18:51 (nine years ago)
No. I reckon next year
― groovypanda, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:01 (nine years ago)
she's so tacky. ugh.
― maura, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:07 (nine years ago)
like that Calvin move was such a high school popular girl asserting her rightful queen bee place move that it's almost horrific. go jump on a beach for the gram!!
― maura, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:08 (nine years ago)
congrats to taylor swift for somehow making twattacular goon calvin harris come across well in this post-split tiff
― ♫ Corbyn's on fire / PLP is terrified ♫ (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:08 (nine years ago)
I don't think I understand this incident, could someone summarise for me?
― boxedjoy, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:49 (nine years ago)
1.) taylor writes a song. calvin produces it and rihanna performs it. taylor's contributions are credited under a pseudonym, on her urging. (lyrics and melody and background vocals.) i think she gets royalties for it too. 2,) calvin is asked if he will work with taylor in the future. he says "we never thought about it"even though they secretly collaborated. 3.) taylor is offended by calvin's comments(????)4.) taylor breaks up with calvin to begin a relationship with tom hiddleston. takes it on a global tour. 5.) calvin is apparently heartbroken. every once in a while he will imply that he is upset with how she is acting in the media but pulls back before saying anything he can't take back. alternates vague criticisms of her recent behavior with praising her to the moon -- classic behavior of heartbroken person who has cognitive dissonance induced by idealizing someone who hurt them. 6.) to throw salt in the wounds, taylors rep tells TMZ she wrote that riri song and wasn't credited. implies calvin took credit when he shouldn't have even though she was the one who wanted to publish under a pseudonym. 7.) calvin tries to "set the record straight" about her pseudonymous contributions. claims that taylor should focus on her own happiness instead of dragging him down, or something. still intersperses this with praising her songwriting. 8.) calvin's friends call him to make sure he is ok. when he doesn't answer his phone they all panic. is discovered late at night crying under a boardwalk. (speculative)9.) anthropogenic climate change causes a global refugee crisis. world is thrown into disarray. 10.) small, local skirmishes break out everywhere. TIME magazine calls them "the resource wars."11.) infrastructure breaks down. media goes black. people organize themselves into local tribes; humanity reverts to a pre-modern age. 12.) sun implodes. earth is sucked into a black hole.
― Treeship, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 23:57 (nine years ago)
at least there's a happy ending for #hiddleswift
― davey, Thursday, 14 July 2016 00:00 (nine years ago)
i lold
― mom us (map), Thursday, 14 July 2016 00:02 (nine years ago)
#tayloki
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Thursday, 14 July 2016 00:04 (nine years ago)
I dunno, saying "oh by the way that hit by my ex you all like? I wrote that" seems like a classic male dick move rather than a queen bee thing specifically.
Kinda ironic given the whole kerfuffle as between Harris and Rita Ora with regard to "I Will Never Let You Down".
― Tim F, Thursday, 14 July 2016 01:42 (nine years ago)
seems like a weird thing to do regardless. but harris isn't blameless here because he responded by downplaying her involvement, implying (by omission) that her only contribution was the lyrics. then taylor's rep issued a correction to the omission. then the world ended sometime after that
― Treeship, Thursday, 14 July 2016 02:40 (nine years ago)
if this was a good song it would make sense. it would actually be cool if a really beloved recent pop single had an authorship controversy like that that added to its mystique.
― Treeship, Thursday, 14 July 2016 02:42 (nine years ago)
So this has nothing to do with black people or Pokemon?
― MarkoP, Thursday, 14 July 2016 04:56 (nine years ago)
this will turn out to have been her New Jersey, right?
― Swag Heathen (theStalePrince), Thursday, 14 July 2016 17:48 (nine years ago)
(this = ostensible subject of thread)
― Swag Heathen (theStalePrince), Thursday, 14 July 2016 17:49 (nine years ago)
not a chance. The album is nearly 2 years old, and I still hear the biggest hits in the wild all the time, which is untrue of all the consensus NJs on that thread.
― intheblanks, Thursday, 14 July 2016 23:30 (nine years ago)
yeah this album was her 2nd biggest seller (out of five albums that all did huge numbers) and had by far her biggest cultural impact, pop hits, crossover outside of country, etc.
― Best Beloved Trump-Pence (some dude), Friday, 15 July 2016 00:21 (nine years ago)
but i mean, the closest any of her albums has come to just coasting along on momentum won AOTY at the grammys, she's had an insanely fortunate career
― Best Beloved Trump-Pence (some dude), Friday, 15 July 2016 00:29 (nine years ago)
fortunate doesn't seem like the right word, does it?
― alpine static, Friday, 15 July 2016 06:47 (nine years ago)
meticulously-planned-and-ruthlessly-executed career?
― Salsa Golf (Argentinean Ketchup) (Sufjan Grafton), Sunday, 17 July 2016 18:07 (nine years ago)
http://jezebel.com/kim-kardashian-releases-footage-of-taylor-swift-approvi-1783831287
Kardashian had leaked footage of a phone conversation between her husband and Swift—partially posted below—where Kanye asks permission to open “Famous” with its now-infamous line: “I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex / I made that bitch famous.”
in taylor's defense, he doesn't tell her the second part of the line (i made that bitch famous)
however, if you look at the transcript she says things that imply that she knew that was part of it:
Taylor: You gotta tell the story the way that it happened to you and the way you experienced it.Taylor: Like you obviously didn't know who I was before that.Taylor: It doesn't matter if I sold 7 million of that album before you did that, which is what happened.
Taylor: Like you obviously didn't know who I was before that.
Taylor: It doesn't matter if I sold 7 million of that album before you did that, which is what happened.
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 06:17 (nine years ago)
in her statement she says that she didn't know he called her "that bitch" and that this was the part she found offensive. that's... idk.
i'm not sure how i feel about kim releasing audio of a private conversation though, even if it was in the interest of truth and justice
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 06:19 (nine years ago)
i love taylor's ruthlessness and seeming invincibility so part of me is sad that she's had her spot blown up like this. clearly though, the tyrant had to fall. maybe calvin harris can find some peace
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 06:25 (nine years ago)
From a public relations perspective i could appreciate that Taylor or her team would have drawn (or, rather, believe that they would have drawn) the line at the b-word and pretty much that alone. I could well imagine Taylor less having been personally offended by the substance of the lyric so much as worrying about the damage to her pseudo-feminist "brand" that might result from being seen to have "approved" that term. The kind of girl power that Taylor loosely promotes is sufficient empty of specific content that sexist epithets might be considered a red line in a way that implying that Kanye is owed favours does not.
Whereas from Kanye's perspective the use of that word is probably the least pointed part of the whole couplet.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 July 2016 06:56 (nine years ago)
― Treeship, Monday, July 18, 2016 2:19 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
someone in the comments pointed this out but for her sake let's hope it wasn't recorded in a two-party state (like california for instance0
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Monday, 18 July 2016 07:25 (nine years ago)
I can see why she would have been upset later on, at not being played the song as promised, then finding out it was 'that bitch'. But she stood on stage at the grammys saying that some men would try and claim the glory from women's achievements, clearly referencing that Kanye said to have made her famous, and she knew that line, and said she liked it. So her big 'feminist' speech at the grammys was a lie, and basically score-settling. That speech is ruined now (of course it should always have been ruined since she claimed to have been the first woman to win two AotY grammy's, when Lauryn Hill won a second one as a producer on Supernatural. Ignoring other women to enhance your own achievements is not particularly feminist)
― Frederik B, Monday, 18 July 2016 09:10 (nine years ago)
also she had said she "cautioned him about releasing a song with such a strong misogynistic message" lol
― just sayin, Monday, 18 July 2016 09:15 (nine years ago)
Well, she might have done that later on? I don't know. But I've never liked Taylor Swift anyway.
― Frederik B, Monday, 18 July 2016 09:17 (nine years ago)
im just wondering when the cautioning happened since shes saying that she didnt get to hear the song before it was released
― just sayin, Monday, 18 July 2016 09:20 (nine years ago)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yeah, good question.
― Frederik B, Monday, 18 July 2016 09:23 (nine years ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/18/taylor-swift-kanye-west-kim-kardashian-west-famous-reaction#comments
there is some truth to this article
Many hundreds of thousands people seem to have been waiting for this moment for years: Swift’s pedestal has begun to crumble beneath her feat. The unstoppable force of her success combined with her image management has met – with a thundering crash – the immoveable object that is the Kardashian publicity-generating machine....It was only a matter of time before the talented, successful, unapologetic, in-control young woman was fodder for critics, reduced to comparisons to “annoying” Anne Hathaway and almost-annoying Jennifer Lawrence (notice it’s never men who are annoying?), “Mean Girls gone wild”, and the hashtags #taylorswiftisoverparty and #KimExposedTaylorParty.
It was only a matter of time before the talented, successful, unapologetic, in-control young woman was fodder for critics, reduced to comparisons to “annoying” Anne Hathaway and almost-annoying Jennifer Lawrence (notice it’s never men who are annoying?), “Mean Girls gone wild”, and the hashtags #taylorswiftisoverparty and #KimExposedTaylorParty.
taylor lied here and she seems like sort of a manipulative person in general, but a lot of the resentment toward her is certainly due to the fact that she is a successful woman who seems to have a strong sense of self. there is a reason she means so much to people, especially young girls and i don't think it would be positive if it all came crashing down
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 14:12 (nine years ago)
also no matter what she said or didn't say "i made that bitch famous" is a stupid and indefensible line. it's disrespectful not just of taylor -- which, whatever, i don't know her -- but to all her fans my age and a bit younger who consider her early albums essential to their high school and college years. (taylor and i are the same age). they were goofy and gossipy but that's why they were great. teenagers felt like she was speaking just to them. (this was explained to me by a twentysomething swift fan).
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 14:33 (nine years ago)
eh idk that white feminist "poor me" reading of this whole thing squicks me out. but I find Taylor's imperial popular girl schtick very grating; sure you can't spell feminist without m and e but ...
― maura, Monday, 18 July 2016 15:49 (nine years ago)
its disrespectful cos kanye called her a bitch. not cos he 'disrespected her career' or 'legacy' or whatever. as far as memorable pop culture moments, kanye DID give her career a boost. she milked that moment to boost her image as being pure, and clean cut, etc etc. lovely, nice popstar being interrupted and talked over by a rude, boorish, rapper. kanye loves giving people something to hate him for, and playing up to the role hes given, taylor loves to play up to her own image. i dunno about there being a great takedown of her in the press, ive not been following it enough (though follow anything on the internet long enough, and you will prob find what you want to), i can believe we are now seeing the point that people/the public/journalists want to tear apart her powerful, inspiring, yet also slightly irritatingly martyrish/victim/squeaky clean persona, but im sure she will be able to weather it. shes smart and savvy enough, and has a strong enough team behind her to come up with the right campaign to be okay.
― StillAdvance, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:09 (nine years ago)
should say that i dont believe kanye 100% believes he made her famous, he just said it to piss people off and push the right buttons. he is quite welcoming of the kind of fury he knows that line would get.
― StillAdvance, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:11 (nine years ago)
i definitely agree there is something irritating and suspicious about her snobbish persona. but i also know she has real fans and i am grossed out by the people who appear to be "reveling" in her "downfall," which as stilladvance notes probably isn't anything she can't withstand
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:18 (nine years ago)
like, it seems that she is masterful at spinning things to make herself look good at others' expense. however, she does seem loyal to her fans. i don't want to go to far with this, but i appreciate the fact that she makes music for her audience -- teenage girls -- in a way that doesn't condescend to them at all because i think our culture, in general, hates this demographic and sells them stuff that is supposed to make them feel bad. not that she is the only pop star who does this, but it's rare enough that i think it's notable
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:24 (nine years ago)
this is all stuff i've heard from swift fans; i myself haven't followed her career all that closely. but it's enough that it's hard to feel good about seeing kanye vindicated in saying he "made that bitch famous"
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:27 (nine years ago)
im not 100% au fait with the power of kim k - has she mounted a takedown campaign against someone like TS before? - but i somehow doubt that someone as famous, powerful, and LOVED as TS right now, would really not be able to withstand something like this. journalists love the story, its such perfect click bait, great for 'modern sexism' tags, etc etc. i dont really ever believe TS is THAT threatened by this. its just good PR for her to make out that there is a great big takedown happening. she will no doubt write some great songs and get some quality mileage out of it, seeing as she is someone good at crafting compelling material/narratives out of previous relationships, etc etc. apologies if i dont sound sympathetic enough to her. do i think there is sexism involved in wanting to take her down a peg or two? yes. do i think shes a genuine underdog here? not really. shes just good at playing the role.
― StillAdvance, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:29 (nine years ago)
not really being 100% in taylor's corner does not = you support kanye saying 'i made that bitch famous'
― StillAdvance, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:30 (nine years ago)
yeah i agree with all of that. i guess the point i was trying to make was that --no matter what else is true -- this is a scenario where a pop icon with a super young audience is being "brought down to earth" by a 39 year old auteur via gross sexual objectification. it seems like no matter what swift did or didn't do to facilitate this, america loses
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 16:34 (nine years ago)
just disappointed in Tom Hiddleston
― helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 July 2016 16:38 (nine years ago)
the game of the day: talk about erdogan in such a way that others could misunderstand and think you're talking about swift. give others a scornful look when they realize their mistake.
― Salsa Golf (Argentinean Ketchup) (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 18 July 2016 16:54 (nine years ago)
Other way round surely.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 July 2016 17:05 (nine years ago)
I'm not sure anyone is really "revelling" in the story outside of the kind of people who already follow Kim on Snapchat and the kind of people who talk about X diva slaying yr faves (itself a pretty tightly overlapping vend diagram).
At this point Taylor could possibly do with a bigger fall from grace that allowed her to nurture her artistry without the pressure of being such a perfect pop star, but (a) this story isn't big enough and (b) very few people actively embrace that kind of career change as opposed to resist it kicking and screaming.
― Tim F, Monday, 18 July 2016 17:13 (nine years ago)
venn diagram, even.
What a non-story.
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 18 July 2016 17:28 (nine years ago)
I do like that most kanye publicity stunts combine an overwhelming thirst to be an outrageous firebrand with a deep desire to earn the validation of cultural gatekeepers. Like, isn't the line supposed to elicit a "I can't believe he went there!" response? I'm baffled as to why it's important to prove that it gained official approval.
― intheblanks, Monday, 18 July 2016 18:53 (nine years ago)
yeah, he's a very incoherent bro
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:03 (nine years ago)
"Famous" is easily the worst Kanye single, I heard it at in the gym bathroom yesterday and found myself deliberately over-blow-drying my hair until it was over, not only because of the sentiment of that line, but also because it samples two of my favourite songs ever and poorly. Wish this beef was the product of better material is all!
― fgti, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:08 (nine years ago)
xp it's incoherent, but the validation thing is a pretty consistent part of his career imo, from the "I just want Jay-Z to approve of my work" phase to the current "why isn't everyone recognizing that I am the greatest artistic genius of our era, I'm the modern-day Picasso" phase.
― intheblanks, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)
fgti otm, i wish Kim released a tape that somehow made the song interesting
― intheblanks, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:14 (nine years ago)
i stand with morbs
― report your crimes to my burning ghost cock (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 18 July 2016 19:27 (nine years ago)
idk you've got to admire his bravery. taylor treats her exes like ants under a microscope.
― Treeship, Monday, 18 July 2016 19:31 (nine years ago)
or magnifying glass.
what about that stephen guy? she said nice things about him.
― Salsa Golf (Argentinean Ketchup) (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 18 July 2016 19:36 (nine years ago)
complimented his thorax
― Salsa Golf (Argentinean Ketchup) (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 18 July 2016 19:37 (nine years ago)
Hiddleston has been repping for Alain de Botton for several years Morbs so your disappointment is misplaced.
― Matt DC, Monday, 18 July 2016 21:02 (nine years ago)
I'm confused about what I should be upset about.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 18 July 2016 21:05 (nine years ago)
That people actually care about this?
― MarkoP, Monday, 18 July 2016 21:39 (nine years ago)
famous is a great song until it goes into the dancehall part (and then the superfluous nina simone sample, which i didnt need as it was fine just to have rihanna sing it) which sounds like something id have heard on an old NY mixtape in the late 90s.
does anyone know what TS fans think about it? im tempted to go on to fan forums to see. but dont know if this is some new ground of Big Bad Rapper bringing innocent teen popstar into disrepute with bad language. i mean, eminem wasnt exactly nice to BSB and britney.
― StillAdvance, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 09:55 (nine years ago)
Kim Kardashian real name no gimmicks
― based stress reduction (crüt), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:06 (nine years ago)
taylor's whole quivering 'oh im so pure and innocent... poor old me!' shtick is beyond irritating though, mainly as the falseness just reeks.
― StillAdvance, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:20 (nine years ago)
she has to be one of the most condescending, prissy little popstars i can think of in recent memory.
― StillAdvance, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:21 (nine years ago)
essentially i think this story is only interesting if taylor DID know she was going to be called a bitch and said that it was fine - if she did, why would she be okay with that? but so far, there is no evidence that she did, which makes the kanye case a bit shaky.
― StillAdvance, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:46 (nine years ago)
I don't listen to rap, but there have to be other famous women who have been called bitch in rap songs, right? Whose august company does Taylor enjoy now?
― how's life, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 10:59 (nine years ago)
Life
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 11:35 (nine years ago)
Swift’s 2010 track “Better Than Revenge” is allegedly about (Camilla) Belle, and focuses on a woman who stole away another’s boyfriend. (Belle dated Nick Jonas after he broke up with Taylor). “She’s not a saint/ And she’s not what you think/ She’s an actress/ She’s better known/ For the things that she does/ On the mattress,” Swift sings on the song. Swift and Joe Jonas dated for a few months in 2008. After that, Belle and Jonas dated.
jesus
― Treeship, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 16:02 (nine years ago)
fgti otm about "famous," awful song
― who is extremely unqualified to review this pop album (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 July 2016 16:05 (nine years ago)
xpost it's funny that Taylor has this total "pure and innocent" image since lyrically she's often been quite full on since the beginning.
Like the original lyrics to "Picture To Burn":
"So go and tell your friends that i'm crazy and obsessive / that's fine, I'll tell mine that you're gay"
― Tim F, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:53 (nine years ago)
huh. that's horrible.
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:55 (nine years ago)
she seems to have kind of a dim view of relationships. it seems like in every song there is this idea that once the relationship ends the two exes inevitably become enemies.
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:58 (nine years ago)
i.e. like most men and women
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 01:00 (nine years ago)
Not me, I'm friends with my ex's. That way I need not ever dine alone.
i don't have any enemies as far as i know
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 01:03 (nine years ago)
but i'm sure ppl have shit talked me to their friends, which i guess is all that taylor is advocating. i don't begrudge anyone shit talking as long as it's not weird and homophobic like that one line tim quoted
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 01:04 (nine years ago)
i have never felt the desire for retribution and revenge that seems to consume all the players in this drama. they all seem like mostly horrible people to me.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:43 (nine years ago)
it does seem like the particular "market" they are working in -- and that they have helped to construct -- places a premium on sustaining those dark thoughts and emotions that most other folks experience fleetingly and then have the good sense to move on from.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:44 (nine years ago)
once i considered writing a bad yelp review for a tea shop that f1r3d me
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:46 (nine years ago)
tea shop googles fired, gets Treeship
― mom us (map), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:50 (nine years ago)
great. now when someone googles "f1r3d" the first result will have my fake name in it. why not just put "wanted" flyers with my picture on it all around the city
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:53 (nine years ago)
"Wanted: Dead or Decaf"
― Kenneth Without Anger (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 05:00 (nine years ago)
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 00:58 (5 hours ago) Permalink
Conversely there are quite a few songs where she is really positive about her exes ("Back To December", "Holy Ground", "I Almost Do", arguably "Red"; most of the relationship songs from the last album are about being missing yr last ex and not knowing whether getting back together is a good idea or not), probably as many as those where she is outright negative.
I mean maybe like most of us she is somewhere between a nice person and an awful person.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 07:27 (nine years ago)
Mine
― alpine static, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 08:14 (nine years ago)
I don't think she actually breaks up with dude in Mine though - they just have a fight at 2.30am as everything was slipping right out of their hands.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 09:40 (nine years ago)
I haven't heard the Kanye song, but since everyone's talking about it now, I know it has a line that says "I made that b**h famous"... But even without the blatant sexism, does the line make any sense? Isn't Kanye talking about the Grammies episode here? I.e. when she interrupted Swift receiving a Grammy award? How can he say he made Swift famous, if she was already receiving the most prestigious music award there is before this supposed famous-making incident?
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 10:23 (nine years ago)
The Grammys are well known for launching talented, but obscure, artists into superstardom.
― Gukbe, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 10:35 (nine years ago)
ofc she was already famous, but not quite global pop megastar famous, not at that point.
if thats her being 'full on', its still somewhat 'cutesy'. 'lol! shes going to tell her friends hes gay'. the actress/mattress line is malicious (quite good too actually), and a good line for anyone writing about slut shaming in pop (or whatever), but its still language couched in a language, idiom and situation (you can get away with most things writing as part of a 'he/she done me wrong' narrative, esp from the POV of a teenage girl) that people are far more comfortable with. but basically, shes white, blonde, thin, pretty, with a somewhat imperious demeanour. not THAT surprising that shes been hailed as 'pure' or even in some cases, an aryan goddess.
http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2016/05/27/479462825/taylor-swift-aryan-goddess
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:04 (nine years ago)
this is very good -
http://www.vulture.com/2016/07/what-does-taylor-swift-do-now.html
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:22 (nine years ago)
Our Amber had already seen her live, over here in the UK. (Justin Bieber was support).
She won the Grammy about 2 years later or thereabouts.
Had Kanye not interrupted, she would still be that global megastar.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:33 (nine years ago)
― Tim F, Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:53 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
...i'm sure ppl have shit talked me to their friends, which i guess is all that taylor is advocating.
― Treeship, Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:04 PM (Yesterday)
strikes me more as tongue-in-cheek lolz than "advocating" anything
― Twilight Sparkle from My Little Pony said (contenderizer), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:39 (nine years ago)
well yes. but its like saying kim kardashian would prob still be famous without doing a sex tape. she probably would. but was it an invaluable part of that fame? ubdoubtedly. taylor wasnt selling what she now does in the UK prior to 1989.
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:41 (nine years ago)
to clarify, i dont mean kanye helped make her who she is post-1989, she was going to become who she was anyway, im just saying that the imaletyoufinish incident was good for her. its indisputable.
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:43 (nine years ago)
its quite a fabulously profitable beef for all involved in any case. kim gets more followers, kanye gets to... im not sure what he gets at this point, other than managing to look like a devious provocateur, and taylor gets to act like a woman done wronged, which is her favourite mode, from the looks of things. cant wait to hear the songs about tom hiddleston when they break up.
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:48 (nine years ago)
It was the VMAs that Kanye interrupted her at.
― how's life, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 12:07 (nine years ago)
That Vulture piece seems off to me:
While her other white peers, after coming of age, represented themselves as less naïve and more sexual, Swift has persisted in playing her original part, that of the wide-eyed underdog ingénue fighting against the indignities visited upon her by dishonest men. .... Whatever the realities of her actual existence, in her art and publicity she remains the same romantic, asexual, self-evidently virtuous figure that she had put forward in her first, self-titled album in 2006 (an album which, it should be said, is very good).
The whole point of "Blank Space" as both song and video is basically exploding the trappings of the wide-eyed ingenue. And "asexual"? Granted she's no Nikki, but there's an awful lot of sex in the last couple records especially.
― A nationally known air show announcer/personality (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:46 (nine years ago)
an awful lot of clichés in that passage too ("wide-eyed"? "underdog"?).
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:49 (nine years ago)
No one knew who George W Bush was until Kanye called him out either
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 13:58 (nine years ago)
"asexual" is a totally weird complaint. why should she be any more "sexual" than she is comfortable being? that's sort of what i was talking about earlier with the fact that there is something gross about the glee i am seeing in some corners at a "stuck up" "mean girl" being "exposed."
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:02 (nine years ago)
i thought the vulture piece was good in the last few paragraphs, but the things i didnt quite get were the insinuation that her not allying herself with rap and R&B is a dubious move (why? it might be that she thinks shes above those genres, yes, but might also just be that shes avoiding them to set herself apart, and also tie into broader nostalgia in music), and that kanye and kim have somehow exposed some great flaw in her/her music, when i dont think any of her fans really want her, or expect her to really turn her persona on its head. i cant imagine that they think it has run its course.
― StillAdvance, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:11 (nine years ago)
They need to settle this with a rap-off.
― how's life, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:25 (nine years ago)
or a round of croquet on martha's vineyard
― Treeship, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:34 (nine years ago)
Both, but we'd need a tiebreaker event.
― how's life, Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:35 (nine years ago)
a wine-tasting smackdown
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Wednesday, 20 July 2016 14:35 (nine years ago)
― mom us (map), Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:50 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
mess with the tea, you get the treesh
― woke-ing class zero (s.clover), Friday, 22 July 2016 17:25 (nine years ago)
Ready for a new album Taylor, whenever you want.
― Van Horn Street, Thursday, 24 November 2016 04:14 (eight years ago)
kinda concerned about the inevitable drake collaboration tbh
― pumped up kicks and levels on repeat all night (2011nostalgia), Thursday, 24 November 2016 06:40 (eight years ago)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/music/ct-taylor-swift-pre-super-bowl-show-20170205-story.html
The singer, who won the album of the year Grammy last year for her first official pop album "1989," said the pre-Super Bowl show would likely be her only one this year."As far as I know I'm only doing one show in 2017, and as far as I know, this is that show," she said. "You are attending 100 percent of my tour dates."
"As far as I know I'm only doing one show in 2017, and as far as I know, this is that show," she said. "You are attending 100 percent of my tour dates."
― how's life, Monday, 6 February 2017 20:06 (eight years ago)
back on spotify
― how's life, Friday, 9 June 2017 11:26 (eight years ago)
Hi! Saw you guys got Wildest Dreams trending on tiktok, thought you should have my version 😘😘😘😘https://t.co/dZSBbSCcxV pic.twitter.com/MecFvUPNJb— Taylor Swift (@taylorswift13) September 17, 2021
― groovypanda, Friday, 17 September 2021 13:44 (four years ago)
This Love (Taylor's Version) out tomorrow apparently so album may be coming soon
― groovypanda, Thursday, 5 May 2022 16:44 (three years ago)
"New Romantics" was playing in Rite-Aid and I looked it up; thought it may be a candidate for "Obscure singles heard in CVS," as I only know it as a Deluxe Edition bonus track. Was surprised to learn it was actually released as 1989's seventh and final single – 16 months after the album came out(!) – and did fairly well on some charts (although it barely broke the Top 50 on the Hot 100).
Anyways, as I'm sure all have heard, this comes out in a few months:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d5/Taylor_Swift_-_1989_%28Taylor%27s_Version%29.png
― Clientless (Scooter's Version) (morrisp), Thursday, 24 August 2023 05:19 (two years ago)
i am excite :D
― werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 24 August 2023 05:51 (two years ago)
Slut! (Taylor's Version)
― Murgatroid, Wednesday, 20 September 2023 20:02 (two years ago)
Unless she's waiting to reveal them in coming weeks, no guest stars on the vault tracks this time?
― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 20 September 2023 22:58 (two years ago)
Weird how she changed the "Blank Space" line to "Come on all you Dunkin' lovers"
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 05:06 (one year ago)
I think the 1989 songs sound like sh*t, but the Vault tracks are really strong this time around.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 05:19 (one year ago)
wow, damn, this last one especially... 100% legit
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 05:24 (one year ago)
This sounds noticeably worse than the previous rerecordings. Weird echo or something in the vocals that wasn’t there before, unless it’s the Spotify quality affecting it.
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 27 October 2023 09:05 (one year ago)
She removed the “Hey!’s from Blank Space
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 09:12 (one year ago)
i listened to a bit of this and whenever i thought a detail sounded weird i went back and compared and it was always pretty much spot-on. i think these re-recordings just encourage listening with a weird focus on details that can catch you out if you haven't done that before
these vault tracks are better than at least a third of the album and really paint a picture of how this album could have been so much better. it's quite different from previous vault tracks which were re-arranged to the point of not really having the possibility of fitting with their parent albums
― ufo, Friday, 27 October 2023 12:04 (one year ago)
The indexing is fucked up – I Know Places starts in the middle of the song and includes the intro to Clean.
― Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 27 October 2023 12:34 (one year ago)
i'm two tracks in, the compression and weird gating on blank space is so fatiguing...
― maelin, Friday, 27 October 2023 13:19 (one year ago)
the fuck? there's loads of weird high frequency information on this... i'm listening lossless. your ear latches onto it and it really throws the low end off. the drums have lost all their pizzazz on shake it off...
― maelin, Friday, 27 October 2023 13:22 (one year ago)
It does seem noticeably different on the Max Martin songs, like they couldn’t duplicate the sound or we’re trying for what she does in concert
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 13:40 (one year ago)
It seems like if it was easy to replicate whatever it is these big-name producers do in the studio, then everyone would be doing it.
I haven't looked, but just curious, who *is* credited as producer(s) on all these new versions?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 27 October 2023 13:52 (one year ago)
I think Shellback is involved with most of them
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 13:54 (one year ago)
I mean on some of the Max Martin songs. Christopher Rowe is the main producer.
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 13:57 (one year ago)
Shellback’s on just one track, it looks like. It’s mostly this guy, this guy, Antonoff on a few tracks (including most the vault tracks), Imogen Heap on “Clean”…
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 13:58 (one year ago)
(these are all co-producers with Swift)
Oh one of the vault tracks was co-written with Diane Warren, that’s interesting
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 13:59 (one year ago)
Shellback produced Wildest Dreams but is listed as "Drums, Sound Effects" for Shake it Off
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 14:01 (one year ago)
I hadn’t heard of Rowe but it looks like he’s primarily a country guy, wonder why she worked with him on these particular songs.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 14:10 (one year ago)
He's done production on all of the rerecorded albums. Must be able able to bang tracks out quickly.
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 14:13 (one year ago)
lol she got Kendrick to re-do his Bad Blood verse on the deluxe version
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 14:14 (one year ago)
the cover art for this one is much worse than the original, how boring. I don't think I'll bother giving this a listen
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:09 (one year ago)
Yeah I really don't like the regular version cover, but some of the alternates had better photos imo.
― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:11 (one year ago)
oh I love the original cover, I think the polaroid is really cool.
ok i'm listening to some of this now and it sounds just like I remember the original sounding so whatever.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:16 (one year ago)
she never changes the things that I find irritating, like when she talk-sings lines like "cause, darling, I'm a nightmare dressed like a daydream". just sing that, don't talk it, it's not cute it's annoying.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:18 (one year ago)
i realize I'm in the minority there and that kind of cutesy shit is what lots of people love
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:19 (one year ago)
she had a chance to change "nice dress" and let it stand
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:21 (one year ago)
It is pretty hard to imagine people preferring to listen to these new versions except out of loyalty
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:22 (one year ago)
"I don't have to pretend I like acid rock"
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:33 (one year ago)
xp - sorry, i meant the "regular" version of the new Taylor's Version. some of the exclusive vinyl ones she sold had better covers.
― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:35 (one year ago)
Gawd, "Say Don't Go" (the Warren co-write) is so so good. All these Vault tracks are so good
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 15:47 (one year ago)
let me remind youTHIS WAS WHAT YOU WANTED
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:38 (one year ago)
[Chorus]I didn't come here to make friendsWe were born to be suburban legendsWhen you hold me, it holds me togetherAnd you kiss me in a way that's gonna screw me up forever
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:39 (one year ago)
whatever else she lost in the transition to pop music on this record, she still loved to employ the framework-shifting bridge. "out of the woods" and "all you had to do was stay" are both catapulted out of tedium by it
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:41 (one year ago)
The "Bad Blood" version with Kendrick is her worst single, right? We can all agree?
― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 October 2023 16:43 (one year ago)
(not that the original was good; it's like she constructed a nothing song out of a phrase she scribbled in her hotebook)
Not to sound like a jerk, but I feel like these vault tracks give the lie to the idea that Midnights was somehow "good" (I think it's a reasonable comparison, as they're in a comparable mode).
Just play "Slut!" adjacent to, say, "Maroon" (or yr favorite slice of tedium from that record)... it's (mid)night & day.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 16:44 (one year ago)
idk why i insist on putting myself through the rerecordings except that they usually summon fond memories of when i first heard the record. iirc the morning 1989 leaked i took it on the train with me and cried to "you are in love"
this is easily my least favorite taylor record other than the s/t so i'm not really dwelling on the uncanny differences in the rerecordings, other than "shake it off" sounding really bizarre
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:46 (one year ago)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, October 27, 2023 12:44 PM (one minute ago)bookmarkflaglink
i had the sameeeee exact thought lol. like oh wow they did really have a good idea here... 8 years ago
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:47 (one year ago)
(not that the original was good; it's like she constructed a nothing song out of a phrase she scribbled in her hotebook)― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, October 27, 2023 12:43 PM (three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, October 27, 2023 12:43 PM (three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
It's a dumb song, but it sounds good loud.
― peace, man, Friday, 27 October 2023 16:48 (one year ago)
― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, October 27, 2023 12:43 PM (five minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
"bad blood" vs. "me!" in a garish fight to the death
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:49 (one year ago)
man antonoff's two songs on the original go so fucking hard
i actually think the new version of "i wish you would" sounds a bit better, more synthy and mechanical. feels to me like it has more steve winwood in it & less haim. but maybe i'm hearing things. i love this song
― J0rdan S., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:51 (one year ago)
Listening now confirms:
All You Had to Do Was Stay >>>> Stay Stay Stay
― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 October 2023 16:56 (one year ago)
"how you get the girl" underrated
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 16:57 (one year ago)
What if you're new to Swift, should you go for the originals or the re-recordings?
― lord of the rongs (anagram), Friday, 27 October 2023 17:22 (one year ago)
Originals 100%
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 17:23 (one year ago)
“slut!” is kinda drab but the rest of these vault tracks….. the long lost mini new wave taylor swift album implied by “new romantics”
― ivy., Friday, 27 October 2023 17:32 (one year ago)
i'm seeing and hearing less about this than I expected, perhaps we have finally reached peak swift saturation. she's almost done rerecording stuff now isn't she?
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 27 October 2023 21:07 (one year ago)
― Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:11 (one year ago)
I think that was ftgi
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 27 October 2023 21:12 (one year ago)
I think she still has to do Reputation (my fave of that batch, which I wish she wouldn't touch...) and the S/T.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 21:14 (one year ago)
(assuming the songs on the S/T don't feel too much like "juvenilia" for her to get into...)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Friday, 27 October 2023 21:15 (one year ago)
"You Are in Love": I prefer the original mix by a wide margin -- the way the vocals are are more buried behind the synths, the subtle tinge of sadness -- but nevertheless, this is such a gorgeous underrated track and among my favorites of hers. Deceptively simple, and so much work being done in the phrasing. Yooooouuuuu. A perfect melody in a single syllable.
― Indexed, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:24 (one year ago)
"I don't have to pretend I like Acid Rock." PREACH.
― Indexed, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:31 (one year ago)
Yeah these Vault tracks are all awesome. The Antonoff sound but more 1989 than Midnights in vibe. None of these would have necessarily fit well with the album, but very glad to have them here.
― Indexed, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:34 (one year ago)
My daughter's conspiracy theory is that a lot of these Vault tracks were not really written contemporaneously with "1989." I think she described them as "very Antonoff" or something, and hypothesized that they may have started from demos or scraps or fragments from "1989" but were fleshed out and finished much more recently.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:49 (one year ago)
Antonoff wrote & produced 3 of the original tracks, but what you said is probably right.
It's really too bad Martin didn't help with the re-record. "Style" in particular is a pretty terrible attempt at a facsimile. Whoever is playing the electric guitar is noticeably not the same person, and yet they mixed it way more to the front during the pre-chorus than in the original, and it really competes with her vocals.
― Indexed, Friday, 27 October 2023 21:51 (one year ago)
Ha, I almost referenced Nile Rodgers's style in that post -- was going to say that you can try to copy it but you'll never get it quite right -- and then discovered this: https://medium.com/cuepoint/the-oral-history-of-taylor-swift-s-1989-d9869cc13adc#.cw9c2ox39
Niklas Ljungfelt (guitarist): I played on “Style,” a song I started with Ali Payami for ourselves. He was playing it for Max Martin at his studio; Taylor overheard it and loved it. She and Max wrote new lyrics. But I recorded the guitar on it before it was a Taylor song. It was an instrumental. I didn’t have a clue that Taylor would sing on it. The inspiration came from Daft Punk and funky electronic music. Taylor liked that a lot when she heard the song the first time. [She was] taking a big step from the music she had done before.
― Indexed, Friday, 27 October 2023 22:01 (one year ago)
she doesn't say "this sick beats" this time so that's an improvement
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Saturday, 28 October 2023 05:47 (one year ago)
Indexed is right about the new “Style” guitar line; its weakness is so jarring. There’s something so lifeless and tepid about this batch of re-recordings… that “spark” is just missing from every element (including her vocal performance). Admittedly, I don’t know how the takes would sound to someone who isn’t already familiar with the originals.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 05:58 (one year ago)
That someone is me, and they sound great to my ears.
― lord of the rongs (anagram), Saturday, 28 October 2023 07:46 (one year ago)
My daughter says she would recommend a newbie just go with the new recordings, cuz by and large they are close enough, so why not? Plus you get all the Vault tracks, which she distinguishes from bonus tracks.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 October 2023 12:47 (one year ago)
i hadn't listened to this album in at least 2 years, and I would not have known this was a different recording just by listening to it.
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Saturday, 28 October 2023 15:58 (one year ago)
xp Well they are distinguished from the bonus tracks, as we’ve heard those before… it is fascinating that she had these vault tracks in her pocket, and chose to release that weaker batch of songs instead. Gives credence to your daughter’s “conspiracy theory, perhaps…
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:01 (one year ago)
Radio stations still play the singles from this album. If I were a programmer there’s no way I’d swap them out for these new versions
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:02 (one year ago)
Would anyone notice? I dunno. Has anyone noticed the nu versions of, say, ELO and Def Leppard? Are they in circulation on the radio?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:11 (one year ago)
I should amend my earlier comment, for accuracy:
it is fascinating that she had these vault tracks songs written and in her pocket, and chose to record and release that weaker batch of songs instead.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:21 (one year ago)
the original version that the ac stations played is even worse! also "me!"
xp the re-recorded version of "i knew you were trouble" from red has made it onto many radio stations where that song had still been in gold rotation. but that one legitimately sounds very close to the original
― dyl, Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:48 (one year ago)
“Bad Blood” is much better than “Me!,” omg“BB” is basic, but I think it’s fine/listenable (and the “blood runs cold!” part is cool)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 16:58 (one year ago)
you could also change "weaker batch of songs" to "batch of songs that I think are weaker" for accuracy xxxp
she might think these are the weaker ones.
― alpine static, Saturday, 28 October 2023 17:50 (one year ago)
Well sure, I can’t speak for her (though she did say, “To be perfectly honest, this is my most FAVORITE re-record I’ve ever done because the 5 From The Vault tracks are so insane. I can’t believe they were ever left behind.”)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:08 (one year ago)
President Keyes otm about the afterlife of 1989 in the wild. I hear "Blank Space" and "Style" more often than other older singles, "You Belong With Me" and karaoke favorite "Love Story" excepted.
― hat trick of trashiness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:29 (one year ago)
ppl have been suspicious of the temporal provenance of the vault tracks since swift dropped the "fuck the patriarchy" keychain on the ground in the 10 minute "all too well." imo it doesn't matter and who cares
― ivy., Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:33 (one year ago)
I don’t think of it as a “gotcha” thing; but as a fan of her music, I think it’s interesting to think about the provenance of those songs and how they fit in her “story” as a songwriter. Like, “Mr. Perfectly Fine” from the (“Fearless” vault) is one of my favorite songs of the past few years, and it’s fascinating to think she wrote and discarded it.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:41 (one year ago)
(I also wouldn’t “hold it against her” if she’s not being entirely truthful about when they were fleshed out / finished… artists fudge the truth about that kind of thing all the time.)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:43 (one year ago)
Yeah, no one cares, it's just trivia. Even Springsteen, I believe one of his box sets of leftovers from the '70s had at least one song that was 100% recorded recently, because they didn't have any good takes. But in Swift's case, it might answer the question "these songs are so good, why weren't they on the album?" Maybe because they weren't done and she's gotten better?
And yeah, fwiw I still hear "1989" tracks all the time. In fact, the other night the local pop station was playing "1989 (Taylor's Version)" in its entirety, which I don't recall them doing for the other re-releases.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 28 October 2023 18:56 (one year ago)
― Naive Teen Idol, Sunday, 29 October 2023 18:12 (one year ago)
Unless you mean she said it wrong the first time? I guess the distortion on the “t” does make it sound like “beats.”
― Naive Teen Idol, Sunday, 29 October 2023 18:13 (one year ago)
<i>The "Bad Blood" version with Kendrick is her worst single, right? We can all agree?</i>
I've said it elsewhere on this board but Kendrick's verse on bad blood sucks donkey butt and his verse on Freedom fucking rules and there's an essay in there somewhere about that
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Sunday, 29 October 2023 19:30 (one year ago)
yes on the original it sounds like she say 'beats' and on this it sounds less like 'beats' and more like 'beat'
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 29 October 2023 22:13 (one year ago)
I’m sure it’s “This sick beast”
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Monday, 30 October 2023 00:35 (one year ago)
And what sick beat, its hour come round at last / Slouches towards Stockholm to be born?
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Monday, 30 October 2023 01:44 (one year ago)
assuming you're not being sarcastic and/or making a Yeats joke: "Taylor Swift Trademarks ‘This Sick Beat’ and Other ‘1989’ Phrases":
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/taylor-swift-trademarks-this-sick-beat-and-other-1989-phrases-41228/
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 30 October 2023 02:32 (one year ago)
I assumed these were all jokes...
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Monday, 30 October 2023 02:49 (one year ago)
It’s all fun and jokes until the falcon cannot hear the falconer
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Monday, 30 October 2023 03:14 (one year ago)
Surely some Reputation is at hand;Surely the Taylor's Version is at hand.
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Monday, 30 October 2023 03:30 (one year ago)
the players lack all conviction, while the haters are filled with passionate intensity
― Tim F, Monday, 30 October 2023 03:48 (one year ago)
Horse girls, pass by
― Evans on Hammond (evol j), Monday, 30 October 2023 04:01 (one year ago)
(if Taylor ever did write a song premised on The Second Coming it would finally justify all the lazy Joni Mitchell critical comparisons)
― Tim F, Monday, 30 October 2023 04:47 (one year ago)
The Pitchfork review, exploring how the vault tracks differ from the album cuts, makes an interesting observation (which may help explain why I like them so much):
On “Suburban Legends,” Swift writes in the dense, largely rhymeless run-on style that defines later records like Folklore and Midnights. The second verse builds to the lines, “I am standing in a 1950s gymnasium/And I can still see it now”—an unwieldy contrast to the appealingly quantized bounce of 1989 cuts like “How You Get the Girl” and “Style.”
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Monday, 30 October 2023 05:22 (one year ago)
I’m surprised that “Slut!” seems to be generally disfavored… I think it’s such a good song (and with a great refrain—“If I’m gonna be drunk / I might as well be drunk in love”)
― Girl (1956) (morrisp), Monday, 30 October 2023 05:26 (one year ago)
See, Beyonce, this is what happens when you don't trademark your phrases
― Vinnie, Monday, 30 October 2023 11:01 (one year ago)
If I’m gonna be crazy, I may as may be…
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Monday, 30 October 2023 12:21 (one year ago)
We played TS in the car yesterday and a few of the redone 1989 songs came up. "Style" was the one I noticed was particularly lacking for the reasons some of you mentioned: guitar and mixing were weaker, less emotion in the vocal. But I've also listened to that song many more times than the others so the differences jump out
― Vinnie, Monday, 30 October 2023 14:02 (one year ago)
Finally got around to listening to the new vault songs, they're really good! The best batch of vault tracks of any of the do-overs? She's taking the imperial phase to kind of ridiculous extremes here.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 8 November 2023 03:14 (one year ago)
On par with the Fearless vault tracks IMO (though there is one track more of those)
― Phair · Jagger/Richards · Carl Perkins (morrisp), Wednesday, 8 November 2023 03:25 (one year ago)
It's interesting that Midnights was received rather poorly here yet there seems to be universal approval of the Vault tracks. There's a lot of "Mastermind" and "Labyrinth" in "Suburban Legends" and "Is It Over Now."
― Indexed, Wednesday, 8 November 2023 14:59 (one year ago)
Well as J0rdan and I discussed above, they’re in a similar mode but so much better!
― Phair · Jagger/Richards · Carl Perkins (morrisp), Wednesday, 8 November 2023 15:45 (one year ago)
i made my ilm post longer. from that thread....uh...the one about listening to things you never listen to. then i gave it a proper internet title.
It’s Official! When This Middle-Aged Man Listens To A Taylor Swift Album For The First Time, What He Has To Say May Shock You!
https://medium.com/p/a5f057f041fb
― scott seward, Sunday, 13 October 2024 14:02 (eleven months ago)
You could drop this song on Russia and Putin would be in shackles by morning.
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 October 2024 14:09 (eleven months ago)
I do appreciate that Taylor’s 80s doesn’t actually sound like 1989 and more like a mid-80s
Pretty otm, though I suspect Taylor would be more Alannah Myles than Black Box or Technotronic, though wouldn't that be something. I find with a lot of current pop stars their idea of the '80s is so different from my memory of the '80s that it's like living in a different timeline.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 13 October 2024 14:17 (eleven months ago)
As it should be.
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 October 2024 14:18 (eleven months ago)
Did she invent the way she says the word “find”?
wonder if it's a play on "foine", as in fine looking.
― gneiss, gneiss, very gneiss (outdoor_miner), Sunday, 13 October 2024 16:18 (eleven months ago)
xpost Yeah when I think about all the unloved and forgotten sonic sludge that charted from the actual 80s that is resolutely uncared about now my feeling is one of relief.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 13 October 2024 16:44 (eleven months ago)
benefit of revising this was cyrus turned me on to some really good imogen heap songs last night! i'd never listened to her. and it also reminded me of "cruising for bruising" which is a song i had totally forgotten about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCwsy3v8MiA
― scott seward, Sunday, 13 October 2024 17:10 (eleven months ago)