http://consequenceofsound.net/2015/08/joanna-newsom-announces-new-album-divers-shares-sapokanikan-listen/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky9Ro9pP2gc
― Merdeyeux, Monday, 10 August 2015 13:53 (ten years ago)
old lady cat voice
― scott seward, Monday, 10 August 2015 13:55 (ten years ago)
CHICKENSANDWICH
― j., Monday, 10 August 2015 13:56 (ten years ago)
I miss the garlic pressed goose vocal stylings
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 10 August 2015 13:58 (ten years ago)
Been pretty desperate for this album to be announced.
― abcfsk, Monday, 10 August 2015 13:59 (ten years ago)
Song is great. hits me hard when it moves into its 2nd form
― abcfsk, Monday, 10 August 2015 14:02 (ten years ago)
awesome
― call all destroyer, Monday, 10 August 2015 14:03 (ten years ago)
yes! hurrah!
― listener to of Radiohead (cajunsunday), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:05 (ten years ago)
I liked that one time when she rhymed "caravel" with "Cair Paravel"...
― Sam Weller, Monday, 10 August 2015 14:10 (ten years ago)
Sapokanikan was the name of one of several Lenape villages that archaeologists have identified as existing on Manhattan Island prior to the coming of Europeans. It was located in the southwest portion of the island, on the shores of a trout stream the Indians called Minetta. Stretching things just a bit, one might say the members of this seasonal community were the first residents of Greenwich Village.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 10 August 2015 14:11 (ten years ago)
Yes, this is very good news.
I'm sure I've said it elsewhere, but I spent way too long avoiding Joanna Newsom because she seemed, on paper, pretty distinctly Not My Thing. If, however, that paper had read "dark fairytales by a female Cormac McCarthy", I'd have been much more intrigued.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:22 (ten years ago)
hyped
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:30 (ten years ago)
melanie vibes
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:35 (ten years ago)
oh hey it's not a 6xLP
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:37 (ten years ago)
I am not in the mood today to have the word "ozymandian" sung at me
Also her house looks like Aladdin fucking the Genie http://la.curbed.com/archives/2014/07/41_photos_inside_andy_samberg_and_joanna_newsoms_mindblowing_moorcrest_estate.php
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:39 (ten years ago)
*patiently awaits the unicorn memes*
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:42 (ten years ago)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/80/46/cb/8046cbaa82e8b6e481e58a9ddc287c75.jpg
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:45 (ten years ago)
No harp!
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:50 (ten years ago)
(On the single, that is. Also: video ^^ directed by Paul Thomas Anderson.)
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:52 (ten years ago)
that is pretty sweet house i must say
― 9 days from now a.k.a next weekend. (dog latin), Monday, 10 August 2015 14:57 (ten years ago)
i love that house
― call all destroyer, Monday, 10 August 2015 15:00 (ten years ago)
I feel like I could live there and no one would notice
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Monday, 10 August 2015 15:04 (ten years ago)
Have we determined definitively that Joanna Newsom isn't an extended Kaufman-esque SNL sketch?
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 10 August 2015 15:08 (ten years ago)
that song is like a warning to all the ukulele cutesy poos out there. pack your ukes up, bitchez, big momma's back in town!
― scott seward, Monday, 10 August 2015 15:32 (ten years ago)
i love joanna so much and i hate you all
― j. winters (josh), Monday, 10 August 2015 15:50 (ten years ago)
jk
― j. winters (josh), Monday, 10 August 2015 15:51 (ten years ago)
It sounds a lot like a Have One On Me track. She had been doing pretty well at finding new styles from release to release up to now.
― jmm, Monday, 10 August 2015 15:53 (ten years ago)
i think it starts off sounding like hoom (lol, hoom) and then develops into something else
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 10 August 2015 16:39 (ten years ago)
gone full patrick wolf with the recorders I see
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 16:52 (ten years ago)
ad;lfkkjadf'df;lkakjdff;!!!!
wasn't expecting this news at all, very excited! I really like this new song although it does seem to stick fairly closely with the HOOM vibe, which is ok by me. I was starting to thing that she was basically retired.
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Monday, 10 August 2015 16:58 (ten years ago)
also, nice cover art. Strong cover connection with:
http://www.progarchives.com/progressive_rock_discography_covers/2252/cover_41211028102010.jpg
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Monday, 10 August 2015 17:03 (ten years ago)
I was starting to thing that she was basically retired.
Me too. Unfortunately, it is not so.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2015 17:04 (ten years ago)
hey everyone, no one cares that you find Joanna Newsom bothersome or whatever
― geoffreyess, Monday, 10 August 2015 17:33 (ten years ago)
"gone full patrick wolf" yes please
um welcome to a joanna newsom thread on ilm, a music message board on the internet
http://grandchalonpoker.com/assets/images/Adherer/unicorn-riding-rainbow.jpg
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 10 August 2015 17:41 (ten years ago)
http://joannanewsomfashion.tumblr.com/post/33857487709
^ Explains the reference to Florry Walker.
The restoration started at the top left-hand corner, but it was only near the end of the process, as Varcoe-Cocks reached the bottom right-hand corner, that he discovered that Streeton had scratched the name of a woman, "Florry Walker", into the still-wet paint three times, probably using a pin.As the conservator went back over the artwork with a microscope he found there was also "Florry is my sweetheart" and "Florry/Smike", the artist's Dickensian nickname. All were invisible to the naked eye.An X-ray of the painting taken before the restoration began had shown that Streeton originally had painted a naked woman with her back turned and long hair falling over her shoulders. This figure was later painted out and replaced by male bathers.Could this have been Florry Walker? And if so, who was she, and what did it all mean?
As the conservator went back over the artwork with a microscope he found there was also "Florry is my sweetheart" and "Florry/Smike", the artist's Dickensian nickname. All were invisible to the naked eye.
An X-ray of the painting taken before the restoration began had shown that Streeton originally had painted a naked woman with her back turned and long hair falling over her shoulders. This figure was later painted out and replaced by male bathers.
Could this have been Florry Walker? And if so, who was she, and what did it all mean?
― jmm, Monday, 10 August 2015 17:42 (ten years ago)
One-stop hateration shop, y'all: Things You Just Don't Care About
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 17:43 (ten years ago)
Well that's clearly not true.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2015 17:45 (ten years ago)
so mad that pta directs this video. do videos by great bands, you good directors. gah already, feh
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:07 (ten years ago)
more like joanna noisome
― five six and (man alive), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:10 (ten years ago)
I would love for a linguist to break down her singing accent for me
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:12 (ten years ago)
wish she'd troll w/ the full Milk Eyed Mender harsh voice on this album
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:29 (ten years ago)
Well the jabs against her are the same as back then, so job done I guess.. Wish the haters didn't take as much space as they do, though.
― abcfsk, Monday, 10 August 2015 18:35 (ten years ago)
I think she developed a vocal condition which means she can't sing that way anymore.
― jmm, Monday, 10 August 2015 18:35 (ten years ago)
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2015 18:44 (ten years ago)
Breaking news: people who didn't like Joanna Newsom before still don't like Joanna Newsom. Please keep us updated on all the developments in this story. Please.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:47 (ten years ago)
feel like only a podcast could cure them
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)
update 4 u. I still don't like her music.
― Spottie, Monday, 10 August 2015 18:50 (ten years ago)
probably less "developed" and more "was asking for", given the mechanics behind singing and how painful (to the throat, not the ears) what she was doing sounded
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:50 (ten years ago)
RIP larynx
― how's life, Monday, 10 August 2015 18:58 (ten years ago)
xp ozymandian
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 18:59 (ten years ago)
hence me making a pointless comment
― geoffreyess, Monday, 10 August 2015 19:09 (ten years ago)
I ate a unicorn
― Why because she True and Interesting (President Keyes), Monday, 10 August 2015 19:30 (ten years ago)
i liked the last album a lot, found it amazing really, so i am looking forward to hearing this
― j., Monday, 10 August 2015 19:43 (ten years ago)
Yeah, it was probably the best album that came out that year. But she used to sing in a peculiar voice so it's probably also garbage.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 20:00 (ten years ago)
1. By no means was it.2. It was.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2015 20:03 (ten years ago)
don't you have some old spoon records to jizz over
― j., Monday, 10 August 2015 20:24 (ten years ago)
Hello, my name is Johnny Fever. I'm typically easy going and open to loving many types of music. I do make sure, though, to carve time out of my busy schedule to endlessly slam Joanna Newsom and, if necessary, people who won't shut up about her. BECAUSE SHE IS TERRIBLE!
:D xoxoxoxo
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2015 20:29 (ten years ago)
JF, I would like to explain objective facts to you, basically they are things like 'Joanna Newsom is great' that can't be argued with because science.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Monday, 10 August 2015 20:52 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh1omjfKPU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmePpqPl9nw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iby_PR6nlr4
― scott seward, Monday, 10 August 2015 20:54 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZPgGxmFnE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Asq2mzj8PEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnvK60ylKIY
― scott seward, Monday, 10 August 2015 20:59 (ten years ago)
no artist should be judged by his or her fans' terrible cover versions
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:03 (ten years ago)
debatable
― Spottie, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:05 (ten years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kendrick+lamar+ukulele+cover
― Number None, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:08 (ten years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=metallica+ukelele
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=slayer+ukelele
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=beethoven+ukelele
― jmm, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:08 (ten years ago)
xp uh em, let me finish. that is because an artist should be judged by his or her songmeanings.com interpretations.
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:09 (ten years ago)
from postmeanings.thread:
Hello, my name is Johnny Fever. I'm typically easy going and open to loving many types of music. I do make sure, though, to carve time out of my busy schedule to endlessly slam Joanna Newsom and, if necessary, people who won't shut up about her. BECAUSE SHE IS TERRIBLE!:D xoxoxoxo― Johnny Fever, Monday, August 10, 2015 1:29 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkFever says his name is 'Johnny Fever' because that is actually not his name. Though he is 'typically' easy going and open to many types of music, Fever notes in this post that there are indeed instances when he is not so easy going and open. 'carve' has double meaning here because Fever is a professional pumpkin carver. 'busy' is likely sarcastic because halloween is more than 2 months away.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, August 10, 2015 1:29 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Fever says his name is 'Johnny Fever' because that is actually not his name. Though he is 'typically' easy going and open to many types of music, Fever notes in this post that there are indeed instances when he is not so easy going and open. 'carve' has double meaning here because Fever is a professional pumpkin carver. 'busy' is likely sarcastic because halloween is more than 2 months away.
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:17 (ten years ago)
I think it's fair for JN fans to ask, isn't there a place around here where I can go to get pumped about a new JN album without people just treating it like a pile-on jokefest that never ends? However there is also an answer to that ask, it just arrived via Unicorngram, and it's "no"
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:25 (ten years ago)
look there are two kinds of music fans: those that enjoy some good 'gism and those that don't. Joanna's songs load me up with that good 'gism is the thing.
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:27 (ten years ago)
'gism is of course short for syllogism
Majority of the posts actually positive so far?
All those clips except "81" are songs from her first album, right? The woman that does "81" sounds good to me. I don't know, I especially enjoy listening to her songs with a lyric sheet. New song is beautiful.
― timellison, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:28 (ten years ago)
the multi-tracked vibrato minute of this is so rad & promising
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:29 (ten years ago)
that song is intersting, i could get into this. i've sort of avoided her because she's california royalty, which i know is like my own hang-up. well i guess i don't have to buy anything.
― e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:41 (ten years ago)
Ys is still is that mindblowing monument of an album.
― abcfsk, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:53 (ten years ago)
is it too much to ask the no-newsom crew to comes up with some new zings, you guys have had like 5 years.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:54 (ten years ago)
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, August 10, 2015 4:27 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, August 10, 2015 4:27 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark
this is straight up gross
― La Lechera, Monday, 10 August 2015 21:56 (ten years ago)
just trying to touch hearts larger than a thimble, but I apologize
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 21:57 (ten years ago)
cad otm though
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, 10 August 2015 22:01 (ten years ago)
yeah, i've only heard her music casually, but this the first thing that makes me want to hear more.
― lil urbane (Jordan), Monday, 10 August 2015 22:01 (ten years ago)
Have One On Me is most probably my favorite album ever.
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 10 August 2015 22:15 (ten years ago)
hoom was my favorite album of 2010 definitely
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 10 August 2015 22:35 (ten years ago)
"in california" makes me instantly cry
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, August 10, 2015 7:35 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
um excuse me it's "whom"
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Monday, 10 August 2015 22:52 (ten years ago)
HOOM had some amazing highlights but I never listen to the whole thing
Ys is just the right portion of Newsom for me
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Monday, 10 August 2015 22:54 (ten years ago)
I'll ride for Milk-Eyed Mender all day but let's be honest there's no car on the road that gives better mileage than unicorn jokes
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 02:02 (ten years ago)
the lyrics to the new song are also great but imo she's a great lyricist and only gets better with each record
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 02:20 (ten years ago)
so the arrangements could be roughly identical to hoomicorn and there'd still probably be a lot there for me in terms of progression
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 02:23 (ten years ago)
ok actually never mind "waltz of the 1st lightborne" should have the texture a van der graaf generator song
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 02:27 (ten years ago)
strange animal!
― akm, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 03:39 (ten years ago)
liking the new track but can't shake the similarity to you and me bess. similar progression and turnaround in the first half
― linee, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 05:15 (ten years ago)
why can't this be a safe space for joanna newsom fandom
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 05:44 (ten years ago)
huh i thought jc loves chachi was a legit newsom hater, yr troll game is solid.
love the last couple of minutes of this, the multi-tracked vocals, the woodwinds that sound like fripp-y guitar or fripp-y guitar that sounds like woodwinds, v nice
― Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 12:19 (ten years ago)
― j. winters (josh), Tuesday, August 11, 2015 1:44 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeah looking back at the HOOM thread and it's seriously bothersome, verging on bullying.
― Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 14:34 (ten years ago)
cmon some signifiers are just inherently ridiculous and should be given no quarter
https://thebabarazzi.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/tumblr_lpq17wqzl61r03771o1_500.jpg
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 14:40 (ten years ago)
In many cases, people justifiably get shit for spraying troll piss all over a thread whose subject they don't care for. I don't know why there are exceptions.
'Spraying Troll Piss' is a song on the new album, btw, iirc.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 14:48 (ten years ago)
the list is shrinking daily but there are still things on ilx that it's cool to be a dick about
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 14:56 (ten years ago)
originality of zings is entirely the issue imo, zings are fine but voice-is-like-cats jokes are embarrassing to read
― tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:04 (ten years ago)
YOUR FACE IS EMBARRASSING TO READ!
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:11 (ten years ago)
haha, i'm done on this thread, i swear. enjoy your cat lady, you guys! i just had to get that out of my system...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:12 (ten years ago)
(i tried to play the new JN song for my wife last night and she had to leave the room. true love!!!)
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:13 (ten years ago)
voice is like a cat-lady's, which is embarrassing because it's basic-level sexist. xxxp oh look a not-apology
the quaint thing about this thread so far is it's 100% dudes either "loving" or "not loving" a woman's music. except for la lechera calling out the jizz joke.
― e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:16 (ten years ago)
i'm not even much of a JN fan (yet?) and the zings are tired itt
― marcos, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:22 (ten years ago)
there's something much worse than "not loving" going on here
― Ys Man a.k.a. Have One on G (geoffreyess), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:22 (ten years ago)
i misread, he did say "old lady cat voice" which is just kind of whatever so i take back my risibleness
― e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:31 (ten years ago)
it was a play on old man hat voice. the yin to JN's yang.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:34 (ten years ago)
I can't speak for every troll, but there's no misogyny in my JN hatred. What hearing her voice brings out of me is the same intense revulsion I get when Dan Bejar or Antony Hegarty sings, because none of them make music that is good enough for me to get past what they sound like when they sing (although JN has the added layer of being very "ren faire" and playing a harp, so she's going to get 3 times the trolling).
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:35 (ten years ago)
it makes me cringe. what can i say. the only part i dug from the new song was the frippertronic kate bush part at the end.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:36 (ten years ago)
except for la lechera calling out the jizz joke.― e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:16 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― e-bouquet (mattresslessness), Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:16 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
thing is there's a JN lyric apparently about semen and it requires a syllogism to get to that conclusion and too much coffee
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:38 (ten years ago)
Is the title meant as like Olympic divers or deep sea divers or divers as in the olde tyme way of saying "diverse"
― killfile with that .exe, you goon (wins), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:44 (ten years ago)
the normal response to revulsion is just to stay away.
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:46 (ten years ago)
http://image4.spreadshirtmedia.com/image-server/v1/products/111488380/views/1,width=235,height=235,appearanceId=1/Why-Be-Normal-.png
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 15:57 (ten years ago)
there's really no extracting joanna newsom-hate from our misogynist culture - it informs all of our tastes and word choice. it's quite possible my desire to verbally snicker-snag when asked to earnestly engage with what sounds like someone playing a fubar-scratched CD of The Kick Inside is nothing but a macho defense mechanism that has to be transcended if we're ever to achieve true understanding and mutual respect. i will fully admit that.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:05 (ten years ago)
I guess there's a good chance this song (recorded live 2012) will be on the album (maybe as track 7 "Divers")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuN-4gykysU
― jmm, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:05 (ten years ago)
Keep Austin ilxor.com Weird offended.
― how's life, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:06 (ten years ago)
I've never got into JN as much as I should. A friend gave me a mix CD with "Book of Right On" on it back when Milk Eyed Mender came out. Loved the song, but never checked out the album. Then Ys was just too much. I don't think I was ready for 15 minute harp epics or whatever. So I skipped HOOM after that. I really like this track though.
― how's life, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:08 (ten years ago)
Again, my previously-uninformed opinion of JN was infected by many of the same (un-/underinformed) prejudices expressed by the haters itt. The type of music she makes is not the type of music I typically enjoy. But I engaged with her music after a stretch of being put off by the descriptors and the ambience suggested by those descriptors and I'm really glad that I did. She's responsible some of my favorite music from the last ten years.
90% of the objectionable voice stuff (arguably objectionable, as I came to enjoy the way it harkened back to early-20th C. Ozark folk recordings) is from her first album, btw. She's done a lot of work on her voice and it's really quite lovely now.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:14 (ten years ago)
She's done a lot of work on her voice and it's really quite lovely now.
If I hadn't already listened to "Sapokanikan," I might believe you.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:16 (ten years ago)
Ys is my least favorite of the three, btw. Still good but easily the least accessible. Interested newbies should listen to HOOM first, I'd argue.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:17 (ten years ago)
xxxp check out 'en gallop'. I think you'd like all of Milk Eyed Mender if you liked "Book of Right On".
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:17 (ten years ago)
Cool.
― how's life, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:18 (ten years ago)
I disagree newbies should go to HOOM. Maybe if we're looking for individual album tracks. Ys has the majestic melodies circling around each other and the feel of coherence over the other albums.
― abcfsk, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:20 (ten years ago)
admittedly i havent spent very much time listening to her but easily found tracks on HOOM to be the more accessible than anything on ys or milk-eyed
i didn't particularly enjoy this new track
― marcos, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:26 (ten years ago)
right now i kind of just more admire her than enjoy her, that might change though
― marcos, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:27 (ten years ago)
Ys is the one that got me hooked. I still think it's her most powerful.
― jmm, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:37 (ten years ago)
no, I loved MEM - like, deeply - wasn't super-sold on Ys and thought HOOM was pretty lol
reeeeeeeeasonably certain giving shit to people who make records is a big part of this board crossing all gender et al lines. however, it's true that JN's an easy target and that issues of the constructed "feminine" etc come into play here. be that as it may, the countermove -- "there's no way your clowning is in earnest, it has to be about something deeper otherwise why didn't you clown [other artist who didn't inspire the same revulsion]" is really infantile discourse imo. it's also basically the entire internet right now so w/e
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:53 (ten years ago)
would be interested to know what was lol about HOOM to a MEM-lover
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 16:58 (ten years ago)
i dunno, you could ask yourself, are you adding anything of value to this thread, or are you detracting from its value
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:09 (ten years ago)
how the fuck can they afford that house
― rip van wanko, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:15 (ten years ago)
it was only $6.25 million, obviously a shit load of money but less than i would've thought for that house
samberg prob makes a ton of money?
newsom is also a fairly successful musician but i don't really know what someone at her level makes
― marcos, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:18 (ten years ago)
Haven't we had this conversation already?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:21 (ten years ago)
Oh yeah, on the HOOM thread
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:22 (ten years ago)
did this math. thread is more valuable for my unicorn jokes. every time I make one the thread's value goes up
MEM has Sadie, This Side of the Blue, and Bridges & Balloons: tremendous songs despite plenty of "oof" turns lyrically to my ear
HOOM hasn't got a single song within spitting distance of those three imo
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:49 (ten years ago)
I have an impossible discussion within me regarding Joanna Newsom and how it shakes me and my own practice, and a lot of the non-cwsm artists working in this kind of post-genre indie apocalypse where any and all compositional tools are available.
I don't know if it's possible to discuss my thoughts without making statements that are enormously problematic. But I believe two things. First, that Joanna's music gets worse as she gets more ambitious, more self-aware, and more deliberately challenging with the flexing of her muscles. Second, that my feeling of "what makes her music worse" is not a misogynistic response as a listener, but rather a dislike of when a female (or queer, in my own more pertinent case) musician asserts his/her feminine/queer identity by creating art that is ambitious, self-aware, putting one's talents on a showboat so that one's art DEMANDS admiration and respect.
Considering that music criticism has always wanted to pigeonhole any sort of female musician as having zero agency either as songwriter or producer, it's only natural that a female songwriter/producer will desire to assert their authorship, either verbally in the press, or compositionally. Push their talents to the limit to demand the listener show respect. There's a fundamental need to show the world that one has chops instead of simply allowing one's chops to exist.
But it doesn't make for good music. I feel like this is why so many loud men want to shoo away the My Brightest Diamonds of the world; the music can feel demonstrative instead of being real.
Joanna is real so often, though. My favourite Joanna moments (all of MEM, "Cosmia", the shorter vignettes on HOOM) are the instances where she simply stumbles around her emotional and intellectual landscape, aided by her immense talents. When she simply exists as a writing, singing, music-making person, rather than feeling the need to impress the listener at every moment.
This feeling permeates through my taste in just about all "indie" female and queer singer-songwriters, infinitely preferring when their music is effortless (Sufjan's most recent as opposed to everything that came before, St. Vincent's first two, tUnE-yArDs' first album, Antony at his most emotionally barren, Jana Hunter as opposed to Lower Dens, this Holly Herndon over that, this Grouper over that, this Bjork over that, and so on). But it's impossible for me to extract how much of this is tied to, like, the Kristevan idea of how-to-create-good-feminist-art-in-a-culture-of-misogyny (don't think, just do), and how much is tied to my own baggage.
Forgive me if I'm way off the mark or this post poses some mega-problems, or that my queer/feminist take is not particularly well-informed.
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:50 (ten years ago)
<3 and obviously, it's the culture that is to blame here, not the creator <3
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 17:53 (ten years ago)
in california, does not suffice >>>>>>
but they're such different records compositionally that i get why you think that
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:01 (ten years ago)
xxxp i never had any interest in her before HOOM got good reviews and i just felt like plonking down some money for something as dumbly ambitious as a triple album
i liked most, i think, what you were getting at with the 'music-making person' aspects of the record, and i did like the harp music and found some of it interesting/affecting (a bit draggier in some places), and really liked the band she put together
but what floored me at the time, not too far through my first listen maybe, was an overwhelming feeling of gratitude, that someone could put such an overabundance of music on record, and obviously have put so much into it. it's never seemed particularly overindulgent to me because i haven't felt like it's anything i had to listen to: it just stays there, and i can always find out more about it if i want. but musicians in general had been seeming a lot less generous, a lot less giving of themselves (cast that in musical rather than personal terms, i don't feel any particularly biographical/'identifying' connection with newsom), at the time i first heard the record. so it seemed to come out of nowhere, completely gratuitous.
i don't read that in terms of impressing or demanding respect, personally. i don't follow the lyrics too closely but i suppose the whole idea might have been at play in the record anyway, given the title.
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:02 (ten years ago)
xp i like fgti's take except imo ys is her at her most ambitious and that's why i like it the least (except for "cosmia" which is all time). have one on me wasn't a scaling back in length but imo its rhetorical and musical flourishes were more careful and subtle, which i guess is generated from being "more self-aware"
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)
The thing about this song, I think, is that it doesn't really do all that much. There are verses and there's a chorus and then there's the long sprechstimme bit at the end with a coda. Is that really pushing things too much? There are nuances within the structure, too - the way the arrangement for the verse structure changes, the fact that the sprechstimme part blooms out into this developmental passage where she's actually singing in harmony in the end. This is all a virtuosity that I want to afford her music.
― timellison, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)
really liked the band she put together
otm
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:06 (ten years ago)
I guess what made me reel from the first listen-through of this new track was the immediate deployment of words like "Ozymandian" and the fussy piano parts. Made me think about what I love about Nina Nastasia, PJ Harvey, even Rufus, who succeeds to my ears best when he's ticking the boxes of what-makes-a-good-pop-track ("Poses") or just letting his fingers and voice fall where they will ("The Art Teacher").
@ BradNelson it's true that Ys is amazing at its best ("Emily", "Cosmia") but fussy and insufferable at its worst ("Monkey And Bear").
And the reason that I feel so uncomfortable about typing about all of this is that there's a shade of "what I want my women and queers to sound like" which is also part of the problem of misogynist listening, let everyone just follow their bliss, ideally
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:08 (ten years ago)
i guess i don't like ys the least bc it's ambitious, there's just no breathing room at all, every idea at once
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:08 (ten years ago)
Second, that my feeling of "what makes her music worse" is not a misogynistic response as a listener, but rather a dislike of when a female (or queer, in my own more pertinent case) musician asserts his/her feminine/queer identity by creating art that is ambitious, self-aware, putting one's talents on a showboat so that one's art DEMANDS admiration and respect.
TBH I am having difficulty parsing how this isn't a misogynistic response. It seems like you are saying that for women, exerting effort/control = inferior art without interrogating what "exerting effort" means, or why this is something intrinsically detrimental to female/queer artists, where the implication is that it is not intrinsically detrimental to non-female/non-queer artists. There's an undercurrent of essentialism here that I am reacting very negatively towards that runs parallel to statements like "black people are the best dancers because of their natural, effortless rhythm".
Am I misinterpreting you? xp and I see you are addressing some of this, so maybe the issue here is the definition of "exerting effort" and why that would be a negative.
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:10 (ten years ago)
There is nothing wrong with "exerting effort", obviously. But in specifically a "post-genre" genre, for lack of a better term-- I guess you could call Joni the first and best example of this style of album-making-- there is a moment when the exertion feels as if its demonstrative, trying to prove ones own agency to the audience, instead of simply allowing one's agency to serve an artistic thesis.
And also, does that agency need to be proven before both artist and listener can really relax? When Carrie And Lowell came out, I was left wondering, for example, if the record would've been as well received had Suf not already been established in most people's eyes as a heavy. Had that been his debut, how would people have taken it?
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:15 (ten years ago)
The reason why I'm speaking specifically of this nebulous "post-genre" is that if one is exerting effort toward creating great dance, pop, rap, classical or whatever, there's already a standard, a series of boxes to be ticked, one's agency is directed toward making it bang as opposed to "some other reason"
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:17 (ten years ago)
wow this is right on ime.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:17 (ten years ago)
I really don't get the implicit demand for respect that JM is supposedly making, at least not any moreso than the implicit demand for respect made by anyone who's putting their art into the public sphere.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:19 (ten years ago)
i don't know if i agree with it but i think fgti's reason for it above could plausibly work - is it that, basically, you don't do something out-of-the-boxes unless your effort entails some kind of extra self-assertion, as well, basically?
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:24 (ten years ago)
yeah j. otm re: hoom
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:26 (ten years ago)
I'm having trouble guessing if Medulla is good or bad bjork for fgti
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:27 (ten years ago)
there is a moment when the exertion feels as if its demonstrative
I think phrasing it that way is problematic because there's on open question about the extent to which this is a projection. Maybe that's not even the point; maybe the point is strictly about songwriting economy vs. virtuosity?
― timellison, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:28 (ten years ago)
I don't know that I agree that there is a distinction between "trying to prove ones own agency to the audience" and "simply allowing one's agency to serve an artistic thesis" beyond case A being either A) a failure to present the artistic thesis; or B) a successful presentation of an insufficiently engaging artistic thesis. Both ways of looking at it are clearly subjective but one focuses on the motivations of the artist and the other focuses on the impact of the work the artist has produced; for myself as a consumer of music, I don't always feel comfortable dabbling in artistic intent unless it's blatantly stated by the artist. Take as a related example the fracas about Cocorosie; every song they've produced that deals with ethnicity in any meaningful way has also struck me as blatantly racist. This, beyond anything else, makes me reject them; various interviews about their music where they seemed completely unable to grasp why anyone would view their music this way cemented my opinion about their artistic intent and their manifest inability to convey the meaning they intended. Joanna Newsom does a bunch of stuff that is decidedly Not My Thing but I don't see how any of the music I've heard hasn't been crystal clear about what it was and what it was trying to do; I can't and would never fault her for that.
And also, does that agency need to be proven before both artist and listener can really relax?
This is an interesting question because the answer seems to change depending on the artist. (See, for example, Bjork vs Janelle Monae)
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:31 (ten years ago)
(This is extra-interesting when you start expanding into things where people now look at genres like hip-hop, which used to be about lyrical acuity, rhyming ability and "flow", and say that you don't need to exhibit any of these qualities to be considered a good rapper.)
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:34 (ten years ago)
I checked out of here earlier but now that I've caught up, it sounds like the criticism is essentially "trying too hard"?? I'd posit that ppl in positions of power often (ime) criticize those who are not in trad positions of power for trying too hard but that's because they have had the luxury of being recognized for their work without having to exert as much effort. Meanwhile Joanna is cramming 15 ideas into every 30 sec of song :(
― La Lechera, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:36 (ten years ago)
I don't know if she'll ever top "Sawdust & Diamonds" for me, but I'm excited nonetheless.
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:46 (ten years ago)
xpost "JN is trying too hard" or possibly "JM expresses herself differently than I want JN to express herself". Both of which are more about the listener than they are about JN.
― Those Jorts Are Upsetting (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:49 (ten years ago)
Not sure I would view Joanna newsome "trying too hard" as all that different in intent to something like Roy harper and his side long song suites just coz she's a woman
― feargal czukay (NickB), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:55 (ten years ago)
Obviously I'm not a woman though so
― feargal czukay (NickB), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:57 (ten years ago)
I'd forgotten how great "Colleen" is. That's one of her best, I think.
― jmm, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 18:59 (ten years ago)
@ DJP, yes that's a very good point, that a thesis must at least be visible, and that's def the case with Joni at her most ambitious. And as I said upthread, this is not a criticism of Newsom but a dissection of how people (i.e. myself) listen to her and other female musicians working in an open-format genre.
@ Grafton, I love Medulla compositionally, but don't like the timbre of the vocals on her middle few records, too sibilant. Bjork's latter-day not-even-trying-to-be-hooky records are to my ears the best and brightest example of a female musician raising a middle finger to the greedy-consumers of the world who just want hits, and creating something new and challenging and memorable, those records are amazing; and yet I still prefer her early pop stuff.
@ Tim, absolutely it's a projection, but I'm typing about how we as listeners respond to arty female-or-queer musicians making music, trying to figure out why the Whineys of the world just have no time for any ambitious females
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:15 (ten years ago)
the who now
― j., Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:25 (ten years ago)
Andrew Bird gets similar "trying too hard" criticisms for his lyrics. I'm realizing I have no idea if he is straight or not though...
― Evan, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:26 (ten years ago)
― feargal czukay (NickB), Tuesday, August 11, 2015 1:55 PM (45 minutes ago) Bookmark
i could be wrong (because i don't know much about Roy Harper or whether or not he has vociferous haters) but i haven't ever heard anyone complaining about Roy Harper by cracking jokes about bodily effluvium. Maybe they do and I just haven't ever seen it. But I doubt it, and that's why it's different when it's a woman being grandiose imo.
― La Lechera, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:43 (ten years ago)
that joke was not at JN's expense
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:45 (ten years ago)
was that clear to everyone but me? is it absurd to hope that i'm not alone in thinking that jizz jokes aren't funny/are gross regardless of your intent?
― La Lechera, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:48 (ten years ago)
It probably was not clear, but I was being sincere when I apologized for it being gross (which I can see that it was). But the whole thing was a bad pun on "a thimble's worth of milky moon", syllogism, and songmeanings.com song interpretations.
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:53 (ten years ago)
i did appreciate that you apologizedhonestly!
― La Lechera, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:54 (ten years ago)
Let's not pretend that Stormcock is great beyond "Hors D'Oeuvres", nor that Roy Harper, despite his classic status, is not also totally insufferable. As for Andrew Bird, I think many/most academy-trained musicians delving into pop naturally have to battle (or embrace) the desire to demonstrate an appropriate amount of agency, it's virtually coded into the DNA of classical training
― got a long list of ilxors (fgti), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 19:56 (ten years ago)
Is van dyke fartz on this? (Lol)
― chaki (kurt schwitterz), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:21 (ten years ago)
a pun I also wouldn't want to get behind
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:23 (ten years ago)
These latest, de-trainwrecked turns in the discussion got me thinking about Richard Dawson. Nothing Important shares a lot of quirks with Ys, but didn't seem to get any flak for jumbled tempos, reaching lyrics and vocal tics. I like Dawson's record, and Newsom's is all-time for me. But if Dawnson released a song where the first word "Ozymandian" I feel like he'd get a hearty knowing chuckle for it. Cant help thinking being a guy with a guitar provided a flak jacket.
― juggulo for the complete klvtz (bendy), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:25 (ten years ago)
fgti did give him flak iirc
― oh, i am a lonlely poster. i live in a box of posts. (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:27 (ten years ago)
i am for the record into "ozymandian" but i would be
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:27 (ten years ago)
Feels like 2010 was yesterday.
http://imgur.com/3E1hl.jpg
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:33 (ten years ago)
i'll retroactively give that dawson record flack, it sucked
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:39 (ten years ago)
hey, this thread got good
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:23 (ten years ago)
i like 'have one on me' more than the others because it presents overweening ambition as something of a free lunch. 'ys' seems to demand that the listener get on its side to an extent i'm not quite down with -- i have a friend who went to an ATP event where she performed it in its entirety, twice, and broke down in tears, apparently, at the same exact point, twice.
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:27 (ten years ago)
whereas 'hoom' is pleasant and texturally interesting and diverting and succeeds on these less ambitious levels sufficiently that possibility of unpacking it is like, hey, well, i guess that's there too! -- i mean, i did spend a while Thinking About It, but that was after vibing on the outro to 'good intentions', and enjoying the moore brothers' harmonies when they showed up, or the vocal rush at the end of the title. but it's a very friendly edifice; the listener can wander in and out, stumble upon moments of ambition, in a way that avoids the (for me) fairly suffocating construction of ys.
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:34 (ten years ago)
though that the new song is some kind of mythopoeic read on the history of nyc makes me suspect it will be harder to pull that trick off on this record
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:36 (ten years ago)
i think that's pretty much right. there is something demanding about ys, i hate the string arrangements on that record and find that they add to the claustrophobia
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 01:37 (ten years ago)
I enjoy deeming music to be trying too hard but I also often love the excess energy you get with v demonstrative music
a lot of JN is absurd and posturing but I think sometimes at her most overblown she seems most sincere
― ogmor, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 11:31 (ten years ago)
Claustrophobia isn't necessarily a bad thing. I kinda agree with using that word about the arrangements of ys, but what I like is how these moments in the songs rise above it and I'm guessing that one of those is when your xp friend cried and that it was partly because of the heavy arrangement. Like she gets herself weighed down in these big suites and finds ways out of them and it's really beautiful and uplifting stuff. Also just catchy.
― abcfsk, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 11:42 (ten years ago)
more accurate to say most direct, sincerity is not a v useful term imo
― ogmor, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 11:54 (ten years ago)
just to be clear, my story about my friend was meant to be a criticism, not an endorsement
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Wednesday, 12 August 2015 13:21 (ten years ago)
I'm trying to imagine a way for a composition like "Sapokanikan" to exist without the element of "absurd posturing" that you charge her with. I tend to think that it most likely wouldn't exist at all. If it did, it would have to find some other extraordinary way to make up for the charm that is lost.
― timellison, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 14:28 (ten years ago)
There is definitively a notion of 'omg she can create that' that I enjoy with Newsom, not unlike some rappers blowing my mind with their stamina and flow.
― Van Horn Street, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 16:42 (ten years ago)
Yeah I can't fathom how you would begin writing any of her songs. I guess it's like anything where you come up w a melody or harmony and do variations but it's still super impressive.
I think in the past I would've made more fun of her but now that things like 3 Wolves T-Shirt is a super mainstream and old joke I feel less tendency to zing. Plus she is making super ornate weird harp music and has always stuck to that. Rather than exploit music from another culture like just about every other act these days she does what she knows and what she knows is this psych folk that speaks to her progressive west coast roots.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 12 August 2015 17:58 (ten years ago)
never rly understood why her playing harp was taken as a solid ground for mockery (unless you're also laughing at i dunno jozef van wissem for playing lute, in which case hey follow your arrow i guess), but maybe because my entire knowledge of 'ren faire' comes from simpsons episodes
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 18:04 (ten years ago)
"Sapokanikan" has a rather good Genius page up already. I wouldn't have picked up on the art references.
― jmm, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 18:20 (ten years ago)
there's also this:http://culturedarm.com/themes-and-references-in-joanna-newsoms-sapokanikan/
― Michael F Gill, Thursday, 13 August 2015 05:40 (ten years ago)
The word "Sapokanikan" reminds me of ILX poster Sanpaku.
― jaymc, Thursday, 13 August 2015 05:45 (ten years ago)
just caught up with this, will listen to new song later.
say what you will about JM but that small 6-piece band tour in support of Ys remains one of the best concerts I have ever seen, you could hear a pin drop in the sold-out crowd of 300+ during the very very quiet and beautiful end of 'Cosmia"
live show >>Ys >>MEM >> HOOM
― sleeve, Thursday, 13 August 2015 06:25 (ten years ago)
uh I mean JN of course
― sleeve, Thursday, 13 August 2015 06:26 (ten years ago)
joanna mewsom
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Thursday, 13 August 2015 06:30 (ten years ago)
The Milky Moon msg board has been picking it apart for a couple of years since she played it live.
― lamonti, Thursday, 13 August 2015 07:43 (ten years ago)
The announcement of Divers and the release of its first single, "Sapokanikan," articulated masterfully with a video by Paul Thomas Anderson, was as monumentally significant as an otherworldly visitation; what's more, it signaled the beginning times for a calculated meteor shower of Joanna Newsom headlines that will cosmically alter the life as we know it on this Earth! ...
From a press release. Masterfully! Monumentally! Otherworldly! Cosmically! Earth! I suspect this kind of prose won't win her any new fans.
― Ys Man a.k.a. Have One on G (geoffreyess), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:08 (nine years ago)
is that a drag city press release? if so, it's more than likely someone's tongue was in their cheek...
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:09 (nine years ago)
gross
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:11 (nine years ago)
would you prefer that his tongue be in her cheek?
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:11 (nine years ago)
Pitch Perfect PR. Whose emails tend to be pretty straightforward.
― Ys Man a.k.a. Have One on G (geoffreyess), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:14 (nine years ago)
tongue at ease
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Thursday, 10 September 2015 21:15 (nine years ago)
Second song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keke7BGzJPI
― I know some Civil War re-enactors you might want to talk to (Eazy), Tuesday, 6 October 2015 04:45 (nine years ago)
leaked
http://c85c7a.medialib.glogster.com/media/67/67e714b5384f0143c8f9b3073da39f2ff0442c2e679d6ae06884a3f7af90eda3/sad-unicorn.jpg
― Number None, Monday, 19 October 2015 18:35 (nine years ago)
i am freakin' about this
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Monday, 19 October 2015 21:28 (nine years ago)
Man this is good
― abcfsk, Monday, 19 October 2015 22:37 (nine years ago)
I'm yet to get too excited about this record (not checked out the tracks online) but listened to 'Milk Eyed Mender' while reading the Stereogum interview and enjoyed both at that moment in time.
― michaellambert, Monday, 19 October 2015 23:52 (nine years ago)
Been listening for a week or so. The title track is a real piece of work. Should have ten seconds of silence after it to let it sink in rather than have another song.
― lamonti, Tuesday, 20 October 2015 07:17 (nine years ago)
unreasonably stoked to have a new J-New album that isn't twelve years long
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Tuesday, 20 October 2015 12:36 (nine years ago)
My local 70mm moviehouse showed a new PTA-directed video for "Divers" last weekend.
― I know some Civil War re-enactors you might want to talk to (Eazy), Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:40 (nine years ago)
I'm curious who did which arrangements on this - some of the arrangements feel a lot busier than any from the previous albums and I don't know if I like that. Really love Sapokanikan and Divers though
― ufo, Tuesday, 20 October 2015 15:00 (nine years ago)
are there more moments like the end of Sapokanikan?
― lil urbane (Jordan), Tuesday, 20 October 2015 15:11 (nine years ago)
Streaming here for the next couple of days, with Ann Powers's review: http://www.npr.org/2015/10/19/449323861/one-for-the-ages
― one way street, Wednesday, 21 October 2015 21:49 (nine years ago)
lol
Joanna Newsom’s e-mail address is unicorntears2✧✧✧@ya✧✧✧.c✧✧. At least, it was in 2002, when she began handing out copies of “Walnut Whales,” an eight-song homemade CD that had a photocopied drawing on the front cover and her contact information on the back.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/26/precious-mettle
― Number None, Wednesday, 21 October 2015 21:56 (nine years ago)
http://www.plyrics.com/lyrics/dwarves/anotherclassic.html
― juggulo for the complete klvtz (bendy), Wednesday, 21 October 2015 22:44 (nine years ago)
relevant
http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/have-another-one-on-me-the-return-of-joanna-newsom/
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 21 October 2015 22:45 (nine years ago)
hyden is maybe the last person i want to read on newsom
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Thursday, 22 October 2015 00:03 (nine years ago)
who's he why is he bad
― j., Thursday, 22 October 2015 01:12 (nine years ago)
answer to both questions: he's a music writer
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Thursday, 22 October 2015 01:16 (nine years ago)
that grantland article is the worst shit ever
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, 22 October 2015 01:33 (nine years ago)
is the title pronounced 'diverse' y/n
― mookieproof, Thursday, 22 October 2015 01:53 (nine years ago)
I once saw an interview with joanna newsom where she discusses a video that exists of her performing on the harp when, at one point, a blister on her finger pops and shoots blood everywhere but she keeps on playing. I have not seen the actual video in question. Both this video and her casual manner of describing it seemed pretty badass. Also just being that good at the harp is fucking rad. Wish i liked her music more but i think it's my own deficiency
― Spooky H (Treeship), Thursday, 22 October 2015 02:03 (nine years ago)
GIS for "joanna newsom bloody harp" sadly lacking
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Thursday, 22 October 2015 02:42 (nine years ago)
i cried my eyes out watching this last night. this song never fails to make me lose it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS3Z_hU4GL4
― flappy bird, Friday, 23 October 2015 18:43 (nine years ago)
picked this up yesterday, and there's still lots to digest.
preliminary thoughts: this easily her most polished and generous work. On the last 2 albums there was a big focus on delaying big moments and stretching out thoughts as far as they'd go, here she is much more direct. I like that she plays a bunch of instruments on most tracks, I think her piano playing is underrated and continues to get better. The new tracks don't dig as deeply into her emotions, which maybe make them a bit more difficult to relate to. Lots of talk of wars and war memorials, not exactly sure what it all means though. Lends it a bit of a museum quality.
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Sunday, 25 October 2015 15:35 (nine years ago)
mind-bending LPs like Animal Collective’s Sung Tongs and the Fiery Furnaces’s Blueberry Boat
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 25 October 2015 15:39 (nine years ago)
aoty
― abcfsk, Sunday, 25 October 2015 15:41 (nine years ago)
"More direct"??? Agree with you otherwise about its museum-quality. I find this really stilted and parlour-musicky. Miss the directness of her earlier work and the best parts of HOOM.
― sean gramophone, Sunday, 25 October 2015 16:22 (nine years ago)
I mean more direct in terms of the arrangements and pacing of the songs, not so much the message of the lyrics and emotions conveyed
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Sunday, 25 October 2015 16:41 (nine years ago)
I once saw an interview with joanna newsom where she discusses a video that exists of her performing on the harp when, at one point, a blister on her finger pops and shoots blood everywhere but she keeps on playing. I have not seen the actual video in question. Both this video and her casual manner of describing it seemed pretty badass.
when i saw her in i think 2004 she was between songs cheerfully gluing up the holes in her fingertips caused by not having had the time to build her calluses before touring. \m/
― Merdeyeux, Sunday, 25 October 2015 16:49 (nine years ago)
Music made by a harp player performed by small chamber groups is always going to sound a little parlour-musicky, isn't it? Unless you're going the full Zeena Parkins or whatever.
I think finger and hand injuries are more common than we think. Most artists just blur through like a champ. Last time I saw Springsteen he opened his finger on his guitar, making for some dramatic pickguard smudges. And then there are stories of Flea sealing his funky-thumb with crazy glue. And of coursehttp://s50.photobucket.com/user/bpick999/media/pete_townshend_bleeds.jpg.html
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 25 October 2015 18:46 (nine years ago)
http://www.mi.uni-koeln.de/~hannes/gallery/hannes/blood_pete.jpg
Crazy glue is crazy great. Tape is good if you don't have glue.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 25 October 2015 18:55 (nine years ago)
I love this album.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 1 November 2015 14:16 (nine years ago)
Yeah, me too. There's so much in this album. I agree about it having a museum quality, not only in terms of the war themes but the huge collection of keyboard instruments listed in the liner notes. I also don't find it quite as immediate as HOOM, or idk, not as dramatic.
― jmm, Sunday, 1 November 2015 22:17 (nine years ago)
The astonishing moments arrive with such velocity it's hard to keep up, but the last 30 seconds of "You Will Not Take My Heart Alive"...gosh. One place where the "so much," the constant surprise of the instrumentation, is expressed in miniature.
― Ys Man a.k.a. Have One on G (geoffreyess), Monday, 2 November 2015 17:05 (nine years ago)
I had to look up what 101st Lightborne was about -- apparently, time colonists.
The whole record is personal, but a lot of what is most personal is conveyed through pure fiction or, sometimes, even science fiction—literally sci-fi. With “Waltz of the 101st Lightborne,” I’m contrasting this British Isles sea shanty with a narrative in which I’m talking about colonizing alternate iterations of the terrestrial position in the multiverse. Colonizing time sideways, front and back, traveling in four directions through time.
http://www.thefader.com/2015/10/19/joanna-newsom-divers-interview
― jmm, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 16:04 (nine years ago)
digging her favorite GENTLE GIANT song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcFX9qFf6Ik
http://www.vogue.com/8204763/inherent-vice-joanna-newsom-1970s-songs/
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:16 (nine years ago)
anyone can do what she does.there is no talent here.let me know when she writes an actual song or an actual ambient track.she's done nothing meaningful, yet.
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:42 (nine years ago)
I mean...the first two claims are just objectively false.
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:45 (nine years ago)
have you ever played a harp?it easily sounds pretty.
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:52 (nine years ago)
hahahahahaahahaha hoo boy
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:54 (nine years ago)
yeah I'm not even gonna touch this one
― the naive cockney chorus (Simon H.), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:55 (nine years ago)
but can she play the harp while drinking a mega-sized jar of tomato sauce? that's not easy at all
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:06 (nine years ago)
Now everything is cool, Drac's a part of the bandAnd my Monster Mash is the hit of the landFor you, ilx, this Mash post so witty: have you ever played the harp? it easily sounds pretty.
― NATION: ? ? ? (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:07 (nine years ago)
Easy, easyMy harp and meWe make the pretty musics, easily
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:14 (nine years ago)
if i broke wind against a harp, i could sell it as her new single on a white label.
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:15 (nine years ago)
Have One (fart) On Me
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:18 (nine years ago)
no one is going to make a clusterfuck out of your challenging opinion, monster mash; try again
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:28 (nine years ago)
oh, come on, I was tempted to at least give it a try. a good clusterfuck is so hard to come by these days and the topic for this thread is still tbd.
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:30 (nine years ago)
"When people start to do things arbitrarily to grow that audience, and those choices are compromises, there’s a stink that their audience can smell, and it’s really hard to get off." lol liz phair
― hunangarage, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:37 (nine years ago)
i'm sincere. i just feel like what she does is practically useless.
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:37 (nine years ago)
She should be doing something more... "useful"?
― Evan, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:42 (nine years ago)
GUYS NO IT'S A TRAP
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:43 (nine years ago)
http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/10-09-2015/fe7f4q.gif
― nomar, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 18:45 (nine years ago)
i can play the flute
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 19:20 (nine years ago)
i'm also good at playing the organ
but to what practical end?
― NATION: ? ? ? (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 20:07 (nine years ago)
anyone can do what she does.there is no talent here.let me know when she writes an actual song or an actual ambient track.she's done nothing meaningful, yet.― monster mash, Tuesday, November 3, 2015 11:42 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― monster mash, Tuesday, November 3, 2015 11:42 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i feel that this post is aiming for meme status, and it may just achieve it.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 20:28 (nine years ago)
#mykidcouldharpthat
I hate to derail this awesome conversation, but this is a fantastic video for a fantastic song:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48xlgXqQKLA
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 20:32 (nine years ago)
That is a wonderful song. Some of the best lyrics she's written.
― jmm, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:01 (nine years ago)
don't take it personally!jeez. as long as you guys love music, then we're all friends!i guess i just don't see the use in what she does.if others do, then fine! jeez!
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:03 (nine years ago)
you never her.i like the real music by the real artists, but this is a place of abuse and the occult.you never know what real music is, because people like joanna newsome give it away freely.she doesn't understand the value of music.all of you people are satanic, and don't understand what it's like for real artist
― monster mash, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:27 (nine years ago)
If playing the harp were so special, why is there a factory here that just churns them out?https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/26/Lyon_Healy_Harp.jpg/220px-Lyon_Healy_Harp.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:30 (nine years ago)
a place of abuse and the occult
new board description
― insufficiently familiar with xgau's work to comment intelligently (BradNelson), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:32 (nine years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:40 (nine years ago)
She should charge more for her music?
― Evan, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 21:41 (nine years ago)
because people like joanna newsome give it away freely.she doesn't understand the value of music.
are we talking about the same Joanna Newsom who was in the news recently with some very strongly worded opinions on the evils of Spotify and the fact that musicians aren't being fairly compensated for their work?
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:03 (nine years ago)
I TOLD Y'ALL THIS WAS A TRAP
― I Am Curious (Dolezal) (DJP), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:06 (nine years ago)
cmon let's let his or her schtick play out, sounds like we're going to get some cool chick tract stuff
― j., Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:18 (nine years ago)
reprise of marissa's slate of beefs with poor bela
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 22:35 (nine years ago)
(new video another PTA one btw)
― my harp and me (Eazy), Tuesday, 3 November 2015 23:06 (nine years ago)
I always misread that as PDA.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 3 November 2015 23:14 (nine years ago)
harp is at the lowest possible tier of skill along with chimes as instruments the wind can play
― ogmor, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 10:40 (nine years ago)
Once I played a friend's harp (she was a bit of a druid...wore a cloak) and was pleasantly surprised to find that it was tuned to a key. So you could pluck no wrong.
― Sam Weller, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 10:52 (nine years ago)
dunno why she even bothers going onstage, put a few of these next to the harp and it'll do the same basic job
https://writerscomplex.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/drinking-bird-simpsons-01.jpg
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 14:53 (nine years ago)
It's cool seeing where tracks clearly refer to each other or have imagery in common. Both Anecdotes and Pin-Light Bent talk about a light which is bent and lent. "Lightborne" relates to "lighter borne" in Divers. "Nightjar" comes up in both the first and last tracks. Probably more. She did some of that in Have One On Me as well, but this feels even more unified.
― jmm, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:00 (nine years ago)
amateur hour:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKjkxl6un3U
The fact that she doesn't even attempt to fart on the harp proves her lack of skill and creativity
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:19 (nine years ago)
I'm playing that video now, but how can I USE the "song"? I'm not finding it useful. It hasn't sent any emails to my clients, I can't eat it for sustenance, It doesn't appear to be something that will take me home from the office... I don't know, I'm still running tests.
― Evan, Wednesday, 4 November 2015 19:04 (nine years ago)
I'm certainly glad to be at homeILM thread continues on, alone
― Ys Man a.k.a. Have One on G (geoffreyess), Wednesday, 4 November 2015 19:31 (nine years ago)
So good. I might prefer that harp version to the arrangement on the album.
― jmm, Thursday, 5 November 2015 01:19 (nine years ago)
Yeah, the there are plenty of times when I'd prefer the harp to be front and center
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Thursday, 5 November 2015 01:58 (nine years ago)
for years I loathed Joanna Newsom with the blister-inducing heat of a thousand spurned lovers; something about MEM struck me the wrong way upon my first contact with it somehow, and then Ys is absolutely not the album someone spoiling for the chance to make jokes about self-indulgent artists. but then I came around on her by way of Van Dyke Parks' presence (Song Cycle [!] -> Discover America [!!!!] -> "well I guess I better give that Ys thing another chance") just in time for the sprawling mindfuck of Have One On Me, which I absolutely loved, like loved so much it sent me back to MEM and yep I'd like to formally request a mulligan on that one.
anyway I totally love the new one; it's incredibly listenable, and her artistic flourishes are starting to get pretty goddamned impressive (the "trance-"/"sending" thing is the kind of thing that can contribute to a multiplier effect if it takes hold; it's a short soundbite which sells through her artistry without bashing you over the head with it, and we all saw how much people love using the internet to explain jokes to their friends on October 21st. I probably need to listen to it a few more times but I am really really looking forward to doing so; I haven't been so jazzed to listen to an album again so soon after listening to it since I woke up to the majesty of Siamese Dream and Olivia Tremor Control a few years ago.
― grinding like a jolly elf (jamescobo), Thursday, 5 November 2015 11:54 (nine years ago)
It's cool seeing where tracks clearly refer to each other or have imagery in common. Both Anecdotes and Pin-Light Bent talk about a light which is bent and lent. "Lightborne" relates to "lighter borne" in Divers. "Nightjar" comes up in both the first and last tracks. Probably more. She did some of that in Have One On Me as well, but this feels even more unified.― jmm, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:00 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― jmm, Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:00 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
spent lots of time reading about nightjars (rufous, whip-poor-will, star-spotted, sickle-winged are all mentioned) and the various links between anecdotes, 101st lightborne and time as a symptom in the extremely hit-and-miss annotations on genius. there's definitely a sci-fi/time-travel/anthropomorphic concept album angle to divers
― lamonti, Thursday, 5 November 2015 13:22 (nine years ago)
haha i was just doing the same
if it helps you feel better about how you're spending your life, well, let me tell you, the ones for have one on me have a way worse miss-to-hit ratio
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 5 November 2015 13:23 (nine years ago)
Hopefully she comes to Ireland during festival season this year as I think these songs will work better live, and the European part of her current tour is only five dates. The album hasn't really clicked with me yet but I'm willing to give it time - there was so much to digest in some of the Have One On Me songs that they took a while too.
― the_ecuador_three, Thursday, 5 November 2015 13:37 (nine years ago)
I like most of this, but Goose Eggs and 101st Lightborne feel to me like what I imagine people who hated the last two albums heard - they feel sort of meandering and overwrought which I've never had an issue with before, I can't really get into them at all. That makes this probably her weakest album, but the highs are as high as ever.
― ufo, Thursday, 5 November 2015 14:08 (nine years ago)
i wish she was more into less pretty noises, i wish she was less taken with weird melisma in her scansion, i still don't feel like i have a way into this. a while back j. was talking about have one on me being 'generous' with the listener and i feel like this isn't, so much. but still. it feels very 'crafted', i guess, i don't know, actually, some of the arrangements are kinda 'we had a goofy idea' come to think of it, i don't know, i don't have any valid opinions about this record
― ♛ LIL UNIT ♛ (thomp), Thursday, 5 November 2015 14:16 (nine years ago)
oh, hey.i'm kind of sorry about that outburst upthread, for i certainly didn't mean to be so provocative, much less troll-some.i do feel like what joanna newsom does is valuable, in a way, like how i feel bad music is valuable in its way (such as how it makes you appreciate the better music, even more). (i purposely listen to bad albums sometimes, for that very reason.)anyway, i honestly felt bad posting that stuff upthread. i realize, now, that i should only stick to threads about artists i actually like on ilm. sorry about the marissa thing, too. i was just playin'!sorry 'bout all that. i'm new. just trying to figure out my posting style, still. forgive me, please.carry on.
― monster mash, Friday, 6 November 2015 15:04 (nine years ago)
I think it was your inability to describe it. You dismissed her music as "not useful" etc. but didn't really say what the hell that means. If you want to contribute, analyze and describe why you feel a certain way. The ignorant comments about harp playing is straight up trolling.
― Evan, Friday, 6 November 2015 15:14 (nine years ago)
understood.i definitely didn't put enough actual effort into the posts up thread, and i could have.but, hey, anyway. um, attempting, in a futile effort, to talk people out of loving the music they love is definitely not my thing!sorry 'bout that!i'll stick to my own interests, now.
― monster mash, Friday, 6 November 2015 15:19 (nine years ago)
You can have any opinion you want just present it respectfully. No need to retreat to threads about things you exclusively like, but whatever works. Lots of ILX dedicated to talking about things we don't like.
― Evan, Friday, 6 November 2015 15:29 (nine years ago)
eh. i hear that, but i'm obviously just bad at/i get too heated talking about things i don't like, so i'll refrain, from now on. actually, there are plenty of other people like this around here too. mr. ragget, for one.in whatever case, of course her harp playing is undeniably gorgeous (but how couldn't it be, it's a harp!), and, as an actual MUSIC LOVER, her voice would surely grow on me if i gave it time.hell, there are certainly things i care less for than ms. newsom.anyway, not to get into my own music philosophy here or derail this thread much further (in essence, i feel that there's no such thing as bad music, sometimes things just need to sink in, if you really love music then you love all music, etc).i could learn to like her, if i tried.NOW, i gotta get outta here!
― monster mash, Friday, 6 November 2015 15:41 (nine years ago)
a successful invocation of Raggett requires all of the letters
― NATION: ? ? ? (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 6 November 2015 21:19 (nine years ago)
That you, Calum?
― nickn, Friday, 6 November 2015 22:21 (nine years ago)
I'm not sure what you guys are talking about but BOY was she great in London last night. Interestingly the arrangements are super stripped-back live - she has an amazing sideman who plays mandolin and tons of other instruments but is very subtle with all of it, and a great violin player, and a very unobtrusive drummer - it's restrained at the right times and they build lots of drama throughout. Good mix of songs from all the albums (opened and closed with Milk-Eyed Mender tracks; played a couple of the 10 min+ epics). It was beautiful.
― Your Ribs are My Ladder, Tuesday, 10 November 2015 23:00 (nine years ago)
i wish she was more into less pretty noises, i wish she was less taken with weird melisma in her scansion, i still don't feel like i have a way into this. a while back j. was talking about have one on me being 'generous' with the listener and i feel like this isn't, so much. but still. it feels very 'crafted', i guess,
yeah i liked the single when it first dropped but so far my couple attempts to listen to this have been very offputting - and i really loved HOOM. what i've heard so far makes this one sound very overdriven, somehow. maybe that's more her older sound, which i had never been that drawn to and hadn't even gone back to investigate once i heard HOOM.
― j., Wednesday, 11 November 2015 00:05 (nine years ago)
I find some moments on her records really incredible, but fleeting. It's rare that I listen to one more than a handful of times. HOOM is the only one I never tried.
Lol @ less pretty noises. The last time I was listening to this new one I found myself wondering what it would be like to hear her growl.
― rap is dad (it's a boy!), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 00:30 (nine years ago)
lol i mean -- pretty sure there's points in her other records where she does!!
i still haven't listened all through this record -- it seems dense and impenetrable in the ways 'ys' did. it doesn't seem like it repeats the things that bugged me most about 'ys', so i suspect once i get over the surface resemblances i will find some things to like.
also it helped that HOOM was three cds and i had a cd player, and here i have a digital copy of eleven tracks and the sequencing is, well, idk if you can really sequence eleven songs and song-ish long-form things of varying lengths to flow very gracefully for 70+ minutes
― thwomp (thomp), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 08:02 (nine years ago)
I noticed on Facebook that a lot of people don't just hate her but are annoyed and suspicious that anyone actually likes her. Which makes me love her all the more.
― impossible raver (Re-Make/Re-Model), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 10:07 (nine years ago)
So many artists want to be a love/hate deal so that they can feel important when in fact they leave most people indifferent. Newsom really does drive people to extremes.
― impossible raver (Re-Make/Re-Model), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 10:08 (nine years ago)
i just did a duty listen to this and indifference is p much my exact feeling to her. she remains very melody-averse, doesn't she
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 13:39 (nine years ago)
melody-averse would seem a better descriptor for someone who sing-speaks their lyrics, not someone who elaborately phrases them like she does.
― lamonti, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 13:48 (nine years ago)
yeah, I thought that was odd, but kind of get it too. her melodies unfold over a longer span and tend to be overly elaborate in a way that I think could come off as non-melodic
― too young for seapunk (Moodles), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 13:52 (nine years ago)
this record rules. i can't imagine her being any more in command of her material. i think there are songs on hoom i'll always love more for their lyrical content but this one is more than a match musically.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 13:53 (nine years ago)
melodies that aren't memorable, then. i always feel like her songs meander pretty aimlessly in terms of where the next note goes
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 13:57 (nine years ago)
lex, if it's any help, the shorter songs helped me get the rest of the album.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:06 (nine years ago)
The last time I was listening to this new one I found myself wondering what it would be like to hear her growl.
Last time I saw her live she had to tune her harp, so set her fancy parlor guitarist off to do some speed metal riffs.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:32 (nine years ago)
really love this. i know 'same old man' doesn't seem like much of a stand-out track, but i really appreciate the presence of a fairly plain traditional song amidst the intricate footnoted fancies of the rest of the album. it's arrangement is fairly simple and her vocal delivery marks her stylistic debt to karen dalton, almeda riddle, et al. it's much like 'three little babies' a la texas gladden on MEM in that way, but here 'same old man' also reflects themes and images found elsewhere on the album. clever way to anchor what otherwise feels like a metaphysical concept album.
i got the LP and the lyric sheets are gorgeous, one for each song, with the same sort of surreal magical landscapes as featured on the cover. i'm seeing her in december, can't wait. i kinda love her the most right now.
― gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:56 (nine years ago)
further to DJP's question about joanna's singing accent, i suspect the answer might be 'appalachian' imho
― gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:58 (nine years ago)
you going to the boston show by any chance?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:07 (nine years ago)
i am indeed! with the husband and a couple friends. would love to see you there, if you're going as well!
― gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:23 (nine years ago)
sweet, yeah, i'll be there!
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 15:29 (nine years ago)
I think melody is one of her strengths. But then I just can't understand people liking her but not getting into YS. Talk about generous, I feel like she was just rolling one beautiful melody onto the next in the most riveting way, emotionally captivating and catchy.
― abcfsk, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 16:03 (nine years ago)
further to DJP's question about joanna's singing accent, i suspect the answer might be 'appalachian' imho― gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:58 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― gwyneth anger (patron sailor), Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:58 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
there's a really old WFMU interview where she talks about her accent being a result of coming from a very small country town and some mixture of speech impediments (she mentions a lisp) and corrective speech therapy.
― lamonti, Wednesday, 11 November 2015 17:25 (nine years ago)
Try Time, As a Symptom Lex. The ascending melody in the "joy" section is hair-raising.
― impossible raver (Re-Make/Re-Model), Wednesday, 11 November 2015 18:12 (nine years ago)
― lex pretend, Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:57 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i get this feeling a bit. more than ever on this record it seems like there are some gorgeously composed and arranged melodies which have some pretty interesting lyrics set to them, rather than some tunes and words that were thought of at the same time
― thwomp (thomp), Thursday, 12 November 2015 10:17 (nine years ago)
though now she's more likely to stretch a syllable over a few notes, and less likely to crowd her lyrics with some extra syllables at risk of destroying her syntax -- which seems more confident, i think, in a couple ways, though less of a high-wire act
― thwomp (thomp), Thursday, 12 November 2015 10:18 (nine years ago)
http://cdn2.pitchfork.com/news/62522/e9f3593c.jpg
― nomar, Friday, 18 December 2015 07:47 (nine years ago)
I just put this record on at 45 rpm by mistake. I was kinda taken with it for a while. I guess that's exactly what the haterz hear.
Is this gonna get much love in the aoy poll? I'll vote it high. It's lovely. It's really stayed with me - I've listened to it every week since it's come out.
― kraudive, Friday, 8 January 2016 19:16 (nine years ago)
I vote it high, album knocked me out. Her 2nd best probably. Seems she didn't get any hype help from the usual sources this year though so I'm guessing just her loyal fans vote.
― abcfsk, Friday, 8 January 2016 19:20 (nine years ago)
Yeah, second best after Ys I would say.
― jmm, Friday, 8 January 2016 19:22 (nine years ago)
I loved it.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 January 2016 19:49 (nine years ago)
for some reason i didn't connect to this record at all. idk why
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Friday, 8 January 2016 19:51 (nine years ago)
no synth stabs
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 January 2016 19:51 (nine years ago)
of course
― HYPERLINK TO RAP GENIUS (BradNelson), Friday, 8 January 2016 19:52 (nine years ago)
it's easy to imagine Newsom singing "Wood Beez" tbh
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 January 2016 19:53 (nine years ago)
i feel really unmotivated about voting but if i do it will only be to try to place this record
― call all destroyer, Friday, 8 January 2016 19:56 (nine years ago)
for me the first 5/6 songs are amazing and then it really drops off into less interesting territory... pretty much exactly the first 2 sides on the vinyl version. anyone else find this?
― linee, Friday, 8 January 2016 23:56 (nine years ago)
it's definitely her worst album imo but it still might scrape into my 25. the title track is probably the only place where all the keyboards on it really work texturally I think
― ufo, Saturday, 9 January 2016 00:10 (nine years ago)
"Goose Eggs" is the only track where I'm still iffy about the keyboards. It sounds like a product of her goofing around with a bunch of instruments that she doesn't know very well. I like it okay, it has its own character, but the closing instrumental stretch especially is a little rickety. I love the keyboard touches on "Anecdotes" and "You Will Not Take My Heart Alive".
― jmm, Wednesday, 13 January 2016 16:13 (nine years ago)
I am not a fan of her singing voice
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 13 January 2016 16:34 (nine years ago)
She was great in Dublin last night - the new songs worked very well and the arrangements seemed a bit looser and less fussy than when I saw her on the HOOM tour. Robin Pecknold was the support and he came out and sang On A Good Day with her towards the end of the gig. Selection of older songs was spot on too - she ended with a great encore of Sawdust and Diamonds.
― the_ecuador_three, Friday, 4 March 2016 12:26 (nine years ago)
Yeah she was absolutely wonderful last night. The second half of the show in particular, leading up to the encore of Sawdust & Diamonds was intense.
― in twelve parts (lamonti), Friday, 4 March 2016 16:11 (nine years ago)
I somehow missed she was playing Dublin
arrrrrgh
― Number None, Saturday, 5 March 2016 22:28 (nine years ago)
hitting those high notes at the end of this one, wow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uixz1JTdwpQ
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Saturday, 21 May 2016 15:29 (nine years ago)
Concert tonight! Wheeeeee!
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 16:52 (eight years ago)
I missed this new song. It's charming - could easily have fitted on Divers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGoqZ4zWSsg
― jmm, Sunday, 6 November 2016 18:31 (eight years ago)
It's no "Whip My Hair", but I'm still digging Willow Smith's jazzy version of "The Book of Right-On"
https://www.instagram.com/p/BPS4c31gltD/
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:20 (eight years ago)
Some solo performance dates announced, hopefully more will follow.
― Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Tuesday, 2 April 2019 16:38 (six years ago)
apparently played new material tonight at a fleet foxes gig *eyes emoji*
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Thursday, 23 March 2023 03:45 (two years ago)
! hope a new album isn't too far away at last
― ufo, Thursday, 23 March 2023 04:02 (two years ago)
It's about time!
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 23 March 2023 04:34 (two years ago)
I heard she is doing a flute and harp album with Lizzo.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 23 March 2023 13:17 (two years ago)
https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zbxw6/marie_at_the_mill/https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zczx5/the_air_again/https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zcu2f/no_wonder/https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zc8qa/bombs_are_whistling/https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zdw7z/little_hand_commentary/
5 new songs!
― ufo, Thursday, 23 March 2023 13:34 (two years ago)
https://www.reddit.com/r/JoannaNewsom/comments/11zd18x/good_intentions_paving_company_with_robin/
and good intentions paving co. with fleet foxes
― ufo, Thursday, 23 March 2023 13:35 (two years ago)
well this is an absolute and unexpected delight, it all sounds fantastic, although I hope she plays more harp on the supposed forthcoming album.
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Thursday, 23 March 2023 14:36 (two years ago)
all sound like you would expect new joanna newsom songs to sound. "the air again" is a highlight
― ufo, Thursday, 23 March 2023 14:38 (two years ago)
waiting until i have time to give a close listen before i dive into these new pieces, but just seeing her pop up on the newsfeed has me down the youtube rabbit hole with joanna, and stumbled on this show from the initial ys street band tour that has absolutely immaculate sound. wow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEIH7FUwbfE
― Lavator Shemmelpennick, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 14:34 (two years ago)
I saw her solo a month before that show, at Bennington College. It was a peak live music experience: was only familiar with the Milk-Eyed Mender material to that point, and was totally unprepared for the grandeur of the Ys tracks. As I remember it, the show was in kind of a modest multipurpose room, with a few hundred people sitting on the floor in front of a stage that was a foot or two elevated from us.
― Lavator Shemmelpennick, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 14:38 (two years ago)
Yeah, that is an amazing recording, I've listened to it many times. I don't think she's ever been better than in that period.
― jmm, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 14:43 (two years ago)
hoo boy i sure would like jn to do like... the rest of her music with robin pecknold involvement. that's a collaboration that needs to endure.
― ''i am the kanye west kanye west thinks he is.'' (Austin), Wednesday, 29 March 2023 14:53 (two years ago)
ugh no i know i am the minority but i liked her as a noisy loner not as a mannered decadent
― sean gramophone, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 14:56 (two years ago)
ya don't know if i can agree with that statement but she's definitely too iconoclastic for that to become her primary aesthetic
― Lavator Shemmelpennick, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 15:01 (two years ago)
The Bottletree gig is an awesome recording indeed, a classic in itself. I think I still have a CD-R with it burned somewhere lol.
Worth noting that fairly recently a guy on YouTube cleaned it up (getting rid of the glitches in "Emily" and "Monkey & Bear"). He also uploaded high-quality recordings of shows from every one of her tours, all with links to MP3 320 kbps downloads on Google Drive as well. Well worth checking out!
Here they are:http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMhu9WD0R5W2UtpGX_GaLML8HyWwgg0_f
― ˈʌglɪɪst preɪ, Wednesday, 29 March 2023 20:09 (two years ago)
This tour was the first time I saw her perform, exact same set, and still my favorite version of her band. As soon as she started "Bridges and Balloons" it was clear that she had been working on her singing, and had added much more breath, control, and subtlety than on the original recording.
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Wednesday, 29 March 2023 20:13 (two years ago)