― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 November 2002 20:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― gygax!, Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― dan (dan), Wednesday, 13 November 2002 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)
m.
― msp, Wednesday, 13 November 2002 22:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 November 2002 22:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― tigerclawskank, Thursday, 14 November 2002 10:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Arthur (Arthur), Thursday, 14 November 2002 17:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 14 November 2002 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 14 November 2002 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)
Sorry, I didn't want to make a silly joke cause I really really do LOVE this magazine.
Ronan, you should be a contributor. Aside from Ian S.'s Peaches article, there isn't much on dance music, I don't think.
― Arthur (Arthur), Thursday, 14 November 2002 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 November 2002 18:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 14 November 2002 20:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 7 January 2003 01:32 (twenty-three years ago)
Nice one.
― die9o (dhadis), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 January 2003 20:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 23:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― gygax!, Wednesday, 8 January 2003 23:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 January 2003 02:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 9 January 2003 18:40 (twenty-three years ago)
(my aunt used to be mayor of Costa Mesa)
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 10:56 (twenty years ago)
― JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
― bb, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
― BATTAGS, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
― The Macallan 18 Year, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:23 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:52 (nineteen years ago)
― mcddcm, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:53 (nineteen years ago)
― bb, Friday, 23 February 2007 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― mcddcm, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
― dmr, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Cameron Octigan, Monday, 26 February 2007 00:15 (nineteen years ago)
Come celebrate the happy, all-too-brief life of Arthur Magazine with free giveaways and a reading featuring Molly Frances, Oliver Hall, and Peter Relic. Thursday, March 1, 7:30pm Family Bookstore, 436 N. Fairfax Avenue (across the street from Canter's Deli), Los Angeles, 90036. Arthur's "New Herbalist" columnist Molly Frances incited a revolution nationwide by informing readers of the true powers of almonds, sprigs of mint, and Lord Byron's secret potion (a.k.a. apple cider vinegar). Molly's eerily prescient horoscopes have been known to strike the melodic funny-bone of even the most determined non-believer. Tonight Molly will be giving astrological readings as well as tripling any double entendre at hand. Oliver Hall penned Arthur's cover story on Kim Gordon and memorably profiled folk radicals Faun Fables. He is the statuesque guitarist with L.A.'s newest psych-rock sensation E.S.P.S., and is seldom seen without his trusty Patsy Cline t-shirt. Tonight Hall will be dispensing priceless aphorisms as well as deconstructing the pungent, multi-faceted phrase "no money, no honey." Peter Relic eulogized Jam Master Jay and went on the road with the Black Keys and Sleater-Kinney for Arthur. Relic's profile of the Geto Boys, reprinted in Da Capo's Best American Music Writing 2006, was deemed by Seattle's The Stranger to be "easily one of the most surreal, violent, and ludicrous artists encounters ever documented." Tonight Relic will be reading from his storehouse of pantoums, an unjustly obscure Malaysian poetic form. We look forward to seeing you there -- dressing in black not a requirement!
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 February 2007 02:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 February 2007 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 26 February 2007 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Monday, 26 February 2007 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Mike McGooney-gal, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:06 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Beatrix Kiddo, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Emily Bjurnhjam, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:45 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:47 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:48 (nineteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:10 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:11 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:38 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:10 (nineteen years ago)
― chaki, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)
― walterkranz, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:42 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:45 (nineteen years ago)
― walterkranz, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 03:05 (nineteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 03:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Andi Mags, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 07:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 11:54 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 03:28 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 1 March 2007 04:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
― walterkranz, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― danbunny, Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:21 (nineteen years ago)
― danbunny, Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:23 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:25 (nineteen years ago)
― danbunny, Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 March 2007 04:35 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 29 March 2007 06:31 (nineteen years ago)
― danbunny, Thursday, 29 March 2007 13:24 (nineteen years ago)
― rudyrudyrudy, Thursday, 29 March 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― mark 0, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 23:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Jeff Wright, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 03:28 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 5 April 2007 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
― rps, Thursday, 5 April 2007 00:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 5 April 2007 00:55 (nineteen years ago)
― danbunny, Thursday, 5 April 2007 01:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III, Thursday, 5 April 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)
― wesley useche, Thursday, 5 April 2007 01:54 (nineteen years ago)
― haitch, Thursday, 5 April 2007 02:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Tape Store, Thursday, 5 April 2007 04:16 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 5 April 2007 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― dmr, Thursday, 5 April 2007 20:41 (nineteen years ago)
― filthy dylan, Thursday, 5 April 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Thursday, 5 April 2007 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 5 April 2007 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Ben Boyerrr, Thursday, 5 April 2007 23:08 (nineteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 5 April 2007 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 5 April 2007 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 5 April 2007 23:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Friday, 6 April 2007 00:10 (nineteen years ago)
― jaybabcock, Friday, 6 April 2007 17:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Andi Mags, Saturday, 7 April 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 7 April 2007 21:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Sunday, 8 April 2007 16:12 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.arthurmag.com/magpie/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/cover_final.jpg
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 20 August 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
here's an interview with jay from The Nation http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070716/mccarthy
― mizzell, Monday, 20 August 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
picked up the new issue yesterday and was surprised to see NED RAGGETT vs. the SPARKS DISCOGRAPHY
― dmr, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
Indeed so. (I'd mentioned it on a couple of Sparks threads here.)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)
i wonder if arthur will catch any fbi glances from the "modest proposal" piece re: a gw bush a55a55ination
― omar little, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:40 (seventeen years ago)
I've still never seen this at Rough Trade in London :(
― Savannah Smiles, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
(and I miss this mag so much! In fact, I just re-wrote how I used to get it at Freakbeat Records and would run to a Coffee Bean to read it in the sun, but then I realized I already wrote that upthread!)
― Savannah Smiles, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
Jay mentioned that a batch of issues should be in London soon -- don't know where, though.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)
Any thoughts on the new Low Life zine, or Z Gun? I've seen both but haven't heard much from others.
― silkworm exploding, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
there seem to be many more issues floating around new york than there used to be, I can always find it really easily now
― dmr, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
of arthur I mean, I don't know those others
omar - no agency visits yet.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 8 May 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
Z Gun was a decent read. Think the 2nd one is out soon, if not already...
― gnarly sceptre, Thursday, 8 May 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
Z Gun's alright, even if half of it is just re-published reviews from the web.
― ian, Thursday, 8 May 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
Some of Z Gun is written in the tone of an angry asshole, which made it a little hard to get through. But they go deeper and more meta and interesting than Arthur or a lot of other stuff out about underground music (although focuses mainly on DIY). Also there is some content about old stuff (i.e. an article documenting some of the lost bands of the late-70s SanFran artpunk scene) which is very informative. Definitely more personal. So I guess I'm saying its a good, relevant effort, and worth looking through.
― silkworm exploding, Thursday, 8 May 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
You can always download the PDF of it from http://arthurmag.com/
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 8 May 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)
http://theguide.latimes.com/blogs/soundboard//2008/07/23/jay-babcock-talks-arthur-magazines-brooklyn-move-la-as-a-psychic-death-hole
― HI DERE, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:22 (seventeen years ago)
ouch!
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:33 (seventeen years ago)
That interview was a tough read. I'm an eternal L.A. apologist (and former longtime resident of both cities), so I've got a huge prejudice, but I think he's kinda massively NOTM on a lot of those points. Either way, I hope he finds what he's looking for in NYC and the magazine stays afloat!
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:34 (seventeen years ago)
sorry, but this is funny:
"I’ve been [in Brooklyn] for weeks, and nobody noticed. I don’t mean to sound petulant, but I realized that a lot of people actually didn’t know I’d left, so I let Kevin Roderick [of L.A. Observed] know."
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
i would love to live in L.A. if i were rich. and had a driver. i've actually never been there, but i love it. or my idea of it. it's like america's haunted house. so much weirdness around every corner.
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
on the other hand, i have never once dreamed of living in brooklyn. (not that i have anything against brooklyn)
So the emergency fundraiser was moving money ;)
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:38 (seventeen years ago)
this is painful:
"It’s getting harder and harder for independent, autonomous thinkers to survive in this country. The whole system is rigged for you to fail. The country just keeps getting dumber and duller, and eventually we’re going to pay a price for it."
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:38 (seventeen years ago)
New York is the last stand for culture and the arts in America, the rest of it has devolved into a wasteland.
New York is the last stand for rich kids wearing retro Nikes.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)
http://theguide.latimes.com/blogs/soundboard/files/2008/07/arthur400.jpg
Can someone Blingee this please?
― DJ Mencap, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
he does look pretty brooklyn in that picture. the difference being:
http://floortwo.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/rick-rubin.jpg
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:50 (seventeen years ago)
i still want to move to ojai. but i keep reading articles about how everyone is moving there and its too expensive now. it keeps calling me though...
http://www.erugmakers.com/images/Ojai2.jpg
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)
the guru table is in the gardens at barndall park, lol
― remy bean, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)
i used to write on those tables, and once i hooked up on one.
Uh
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)
"New York is the last stand for rich kids wearing retro Nikes."
yep
― maura, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
I know yr jokin, but seriously that isn't true!
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)
anyway LA is horrible and he'll be much happier in NY
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
dude, it was too expensive twenty years ago. beautiful, though. california real estate always has a $800,000 surcharge if you want to live in an area with no meth addicts.
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
yes, with all the cultured people
― remy bean, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
total joke!
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
"dude, it was too expensive twenty years ago"
rich ex-hippies, right? oh well. i'll probably have to settle for western mass. i can pretend it's cali. lots of rich ex-hippies there too, but still affordable places to live. (maria will never let me leave this island though...)
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
"Culture in L.A. is in a race to the bottom, and all the smart and creative people there are [involved in] new ways to do social networking or figure out what YouTube video is going to get the most views. That isn’t culture, it’s pure pandering."
Oh dude, wait till you settle in to NY ...
― Martin Van Burne, Thursday, 24 July 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
I haven't really read arthur. I like a few of the acts they cover, and the shows they curate here are pretty good from time to time, but I seriously cannot believe how you can be more than 8 years old and think that an entire city can be summed up by your thoughts.
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
New York is the last stand for culture and the arts in America
LOL
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
but I seriously cannot believe how you can be more than 8 years old and think that an entire city can be summed up by your thoughts.
haha maybe you should check out the "most racist city in America" thread on ILE... to be fair he has lived in LA his entire life
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
totally wish dude the best of luck tho
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
cannot wait for do's and don'ts
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
lolol
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
having lived in both cities i am laughing my ass off at mr babcock
― get bent, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
I love new york, and maybe it's changed since I used to hang there, but generally speaking it always struck me as the capital of what-important-thing-are-you-doing-and-what-can-you-do-for-me.
plus it's been a while since anything "important" happened there, at least in a concentrated fashion. there are good bands in ny but not more than in any number of other cities.
― Edward III, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
*tears*
(really though, good luck Arthur!)
― will, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
plus it's been a while since anything "important" happened there, at least in a concentrated fashion
strictly speaking I don't think "important" things happen anywhere anymore, thanks to the massive decentralization of media distribution methods
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
Pasadena's great. I gave up my car a year ago and don't miss it. Being without an auto in soCal isn't for everyone, though. When I want out to Santa Barbara or someplace, I just do a rental. Plus, I kind of like that "important" things don't happen in Pasadena, unless you count the Rose Parade and Rose Bowl.
Friends come over a lot and we grill for them. And people come from back east two or three times a year because they want to get out of the Pennsy funk.
SoCal often still looks great if you, say, live in Allentown or Bethlehem.
― Gorge, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:47 (seventeen years ago)
Why's this dude all butthurt? :(
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
Aw, I love Los Angeles, but, c'mon, don't knock the Lehigh Valley! It's beautiful as well!
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
taking sides: LA vs LV
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
after driving through the Bladerunner-ish polluted disaster area hellhole that is the Port of Los Angeles a couple years ago its difficult for me to avoid the conclusion that anywhere in America is better than LA
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
Oh STFU
― Lolpez, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
your brother's bitterness is more entertaining
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
after driving through the (insert dirty industrial section) of (insert every city in the world) etc
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
if you visit chicago please avoid the southern shore of lake michigan, you might start to hate on the rest of the city
shakey, no offense, but your brother thinking that ny is cheaper than la is stupidity x infinity. i won't get into the other bs because dude is entitled to his opinions, however narrowminded.
― velko, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
$20,000 wasted on the best pizza america has to offer
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/78/198921224_fb8d559213.jpg%3Fv%3D0
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.frogs-snails.com/catalog/Red%20Bummer.jpg
yeah yeah, I've been around. Some places are worse than others.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
i have never enjoyed arthur magazine-- i think b/c it has consistently dealt with things that i think about/care about lots, but always in a way that i find very detrimental...it has always struck me as being too much like going back and reading old sixties underground newspapers/books or whatever, and realizing how clueless and naive ppl were about occult stuff/"eastern" spirituality/whatever flakey flavor of the week (apple cider vinegar, i'm talking to you!)...and also being struck by how unaware ppl were of the submerged aggression behind their "peace, let's all just do some bong hits and listen to this shitty music" sentiments.
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
it has always struck me as being too much like going back and reading old sixties underground newspapers/books
well it is done pretty explicitly in that tradition. if you don't like that tradition, hey what can you do.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)
also apple cider vinegar rocks sorry but its true
for someone who spent his entire life in l.a. your brother sure doesn't understand it at all. then he acts like a spurned lover because the brentwood types didn't acknowledge him. i guess the respect he received from "poor artists" wasn't enough? i mean he says it's about money but it sounds like it's more about him not getting props from the right people. that rant = "every failed screenwriter ever"
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)
i guess i probably don't like that tradition, even though, goodness knows i am obsessed with the sixties and "the underground" in america...but in any case, that doesn't excuse arthur from espousing naive viewpoints about stuff (and i dunno, maybe i am complaining more about the opinions of the artists interviewed within its pages, as opposed to some overall editorial approach)
i should maybe add that i am speaking from the viewpoint of disaffected dude who felt alienated by both vice magazine culture and arthur magazine/"freak folk" culture of this decade, if i may set both publications up as some weird oppositional thing of sorts
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:56 (seventeen years ago)
i tried the ACV thing but i think i like kombucha better
― get bent, Thursday, 24 July 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)
if i may set both publications up as some weird oppositional thing of sorts
I think that's probably legit. personally I find Vice deeply alienating/irritating/funny when its making snarky fashion jokes but its rather obvious where my loyalties lie (even if I don't particularly care for Devendra or Joanna Newsom)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)
i was just in LA for E3 and anyway we were riding on a bus to the activision press conference and we drove by a store front in downtown that had "No Age Weirdo Rippers" painted above it what's up with that? it looked like it had been painted that way for awhile.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)
that's the smell
― get bent, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
oh okay! damn i shoulda tried to go back there and see what was going down.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, i like the "do's and don'ts" in VICE (i even bought the book!)
i'm indifferent to banhart's/newsom's music (admittedly, i guess i haven't listened enough to their stuff to give them a fair shake. oh well. life is short.)
i'm sure your brother is a great person. i just am disappointed by the magazine (and what i see as being some subculture that it tried to deliver ((to))).
but, thinking back, i remember enjoying reading an interview w/joanna newsom... and i am interested in erik davis' work, so...
the day they interview dale pendell, all will be right in my world.
but, yeah, jay took the steps to publish a magazine and distribute it for free, which is insanely admirable, and i am just some dude typing out shit here, so...
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
"after driving through the Bladerunner-ish polluted disaster area hellhole that is the Port of Los Angeles a couple years ago its difficult for me to avoid the conclusion that anywhere in America is better than LA"
Dude, I grew up outside Detroit. I live in LA now. If you think that the Port is the worst place in America, you have no idea what a significant chunk of the US has to offer in terms of Superfund hellholes.
― I eat cannibals, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)
the ports may be ugly but they're a very important job center for the region, so that trumps aesthetics in my mind. and they are taking steps to improve the air quality.
― get bent, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
And I'm still annoyed that I subscribed right before this $20k PLZ! meltdown bullshit happened. Who knows when the fuck I'll actually get that next issue, but maybe "getting shit out on time" can be one of those NYC attributes that Jay picks up.
― I eat cannibals, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:46 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.cleanairactionplan.org/ (xpost)
― get bent, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:47 (seventeen years ago)
hmm hadn't heard about that - pretty encouraging
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)
(btw next issue is at the printer now)
I had to move away from SoCal myself (grew up in L.A., spend college years plus in O.C.), so I understand Jay's frustration wrt the arts or what not. L.A. in particular is one grey arts-and-entertainment factory, which ironically makes it hard to have a centralized arts culture built from scraps.
But NYC is probably the most similar city to L.A. in that arts-and-entertainment factory analogy. Does Jay have to live in the belly of the beast? If so, why does he whine about it so much if that's what drives him? If not, why doesn't he move to Austin or Minneapolis or Portland instead?
― Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 24 July 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
dude if yr in the publishng business you go where the publishers are
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
also advertising $$$
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:01 (seventeen years ago)
i'm not an LA expert.
as far as where i'd go to hang out on vacation, NYC every time.
but honestly there's something about the messiness and sprawl and weirdness and randomness of LA that seems to me like it would be more conducive to a *real* arts/music scene evolving...lots of abandoned places and space, where NYC is too cramped and media microscope, it seems like it's hard for stuff to breath, literally and figuratively.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:02 (seventeen years ago)
art needs a place to hide
but what do i know i'm just thinking out loud
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:03 (seventeen years ago)
I will say this. It's easy to start your own thing in L.A. and NYC moreso than other cities, mainly because things get built up and shut down in both cities all the goddamn time. I got sick of it and moved to Seattle, one of many reasons being that Seattle (as one example) has had some consistent assemblence of arts support. It may not be perfect, but it's been alive and not-so-fucked-with-as-much for decades. Also, I got sick of having to build from scratch over and over again -- like booking bands at Koo's Cafe in Santa Ana only to have the police bust it the year after I moved. Greater NYC and greater LA fucking eat people. I don't want to move to cities where I try to fucking duck and hide all the time.
As for the "dude if yr in the publishng business you go where the publishers are" comment, don't get me started on the cynicism and arguments I have with this concept of LA and NYC being the only places to make this happen.
― Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
things happen in portland, oregon (in the pacific northwest) and austin, texas (in the south, and in the same state as houston!) too
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
atlanta is pretty good from what i hear too
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
the twin cities have stuff. like places to look at art nobody likes and hear dudes making a godawful racket.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
arthur, i think we have a winner
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
'Because I'm an Ohioan -- Cincinnati -- who was born in Louisville, I wanted to find out what was happening downriver along the Ohio. Overall, I discovered an intriguing, funky scene and a good-humored, pop-culture-savvy populace . . . plus more.'
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
twin cities have always sounded really awesome to me. too bad it's so goddam cold there.
― will, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
Whoa, boy do I sound like a doofus. Talk about quotes being taken way way waaaaaay out of context, and all the nuances and buts and commas and em dashes and so on being dropped. Ah well, good for some chuckles for everybody.
Obviously there's plenty of awesome people in L.A. and plenty of awful stuff in NYC. But NYC is a more hospitable environment for publishing. So, we're gonna try and make a go of it here. 's all!
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
Best of luck! (seriously)
I think I support much of what you are interested in accomplishing, based on reading yr magazine, but...yr approach leaves a lot to be desired, from my perspective.
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
commas and em dashes
These only would have made your vitriol sound more premeditated!
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
Good to hear it straight from the horse's mouth. Good luck with it all. And goddamnit, send some more issues to London! (Fine, I'll subscribe).
I still love L.A., though, and miss it like a son of a bitch!
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
The dude asked me if Hollywood/Westside people bailed out Arthur when we needed $20k and I said No, those people are all busy blogging on Huffington Post, the people that helped us in L.A. were poor artists and other folks [see the benefit at the Silent Movie Theatre last year]. But the way it reads makes it sound like I feel ENTITLED to SERIOUS CHECKS from All My Celebrities. It's weird. I told the dude about the bummer that is Sam Zell... the bummer that is Rick Caruso... the overdevelopment that is going on in L.A., which adds to the traffic and smog and stress and misery and crowded schools, and ... he didn't include it. On and on. Ah well. Good for some chuckles, maybe even some laughs -- I mean check out the LATimes comment board -- how dare I leave the city of SILVERSUN PICKUPS???? Oy vey.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, but every-fucking-place sucks in its own way, obv.
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
dell - There's a special flavor of suck to L.A. -- but yeah, it can be an okay place to live if, like Seward said, you have a chauffeur!!! In the end, the people that seem to dig L.A. the most -- or cheerlead for it hardest -- are the ones who can afford to insulate themselves from its faults. These are the people who send their kids to private schools, only get their health care at Cedars-Sinai or UCLA, live up in the Hills beyond the shit and the crime and the ever-dumber billboards and the random shootings and the shitty stucco-and-plastic architecture and miles-long shopping malls that all the rest of us have to live amongst. What can I say? Not my cup o tea. So it goes! I gave the place 20 years, that's enough.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
Also dell -- L.A. police are A BREED APART.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
well, that's not L.A. but about 90% of California... Blame Prop 13.
― Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
Sean Bell RIP
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah Prop 13 killed California that's for sure. Mackro OTM.
The cops in L.A. shoot, harass and intimidate a lot more people than the NYPD do, QN. Cops in L.A. are on steroids, they're trained military-style, and they've got helicopters! Lookit up. Awesome.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
i agree with a lot of arthur dude's points actually, mostly about liveability and this sense of dread i tend to have about spending more than a few more years in this city, even though i have a ton of friends here and a decent pad and a steady gig.
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
you want publishing, come move to quebec. quebecor yo.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:26 (seventeen years ago)
...but yeah, it can be an okay place to live if, like Seward said, you have a chauffeur!!
haha, yeah, i feel like i would do that in a second!
In the end, the people that seem to dig L.A. the most -- or cheerlead for it hardest -- are the ones who can afford to insulate themselves from its faults.
meh, there are countless other cities that one could make the same complaint about, though, right? most definitely, including nyc/brooklyn.
What can I say? Not my cup o tea. So it goes! I gave the place 20 years, that's enough.
awesome. i respect yr life experience. best of luck to you!!
also, try to interview dale pendell!! and karl jansen!! seriously!
it't the usual thing; if i've invested enough energy in questioning yr publication's output or whatever, then i obv. respect where you're cominng from. but i still am suspect of scenic motives
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:26 (seventeen years ago)
you want publishing, come move to quebec. quebecor yo
what d'ya mean by that? just out of curiosity...b/c i have a friend who is moving to quebec next month
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
insulate themselves from its faults
― gabbneb, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:29 (seventeen years ago)
jay--i'm sorry you had such an awful experience in los anegles. where did you live during your twenty years here? were the people the same kind of dumb and shallow everywhere? why did you wait so long to escape? good luck in brooklyn--i'm sure you'll be a much better fit there.
― dan, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:36 (seventeen years ago)
but i still am suspect of scenic motives
that was couched horribly
sorry
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
how dare I leave the city of SILVERSUN PICKUPS???? Oy vey.
sorry I went to lunch and missed this lolololol
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)
It's not that I'm moving to NYC for a "scene" -- I never said that anywhere!!! Ay yi yi. There's a lot more art, music, dance and yes thinkers and readers and who knows maybe even some new partners and advertisers and OMG really great street league hoops that is a lot more fun to watch than the NBA bazillionaires. Geez louise. We're just doing our thing. Sorry I was so poorly quoted everybody! But that's what's going on at the LATimes! They've gone from 1200 reporters to 700. It's gonna be the Weekly Reader with Page 3 girls by October at the rate Zell is going.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)
i just don't understand ppl who move to the east coast from the west coast
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
when i lived in philly, every time someone would say they were moving to california we would say: "great, have fun! we'll miss you! *see you in six months*."
that last part we would say under our breath or in our heads. and then when we saw that person again in six months we would ask them how their trip was!
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:51 (seventeen years ago)
Cops in L.A. are on steroids, they're trained military-style, and they've got helicopters! Lookit up. Awesome.
Jay, you're moving to the city of that thing called "911." You don't think they have helicopters and a bulked-up police force trained in military-style surveillance and crowd control?
I'm sorry but the disparity between the have and the have-nots is no diff in NYC than it is in any other metropolis.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:51 (seventeen years ago)
i know. the times isn't great and it's getting worse. public radio stinks. the fascists shut down your no age show. nobody noticed that you'd left. traffic is bad during most times of day.
what neighborhoods did you live in?
― dan, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
lolz my friends from Philly out here have nothing but horror stories whenever they come back from a visit - mostly about how crack and crime are even worse than they were in the 80s, etc
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:54 (seventeen years ago)
I've got a $500/mo room in a shared, non-A/Ced apartment in an awesomely Puerto Rican-heavy area of S'Side W'burg and IT IS LOUD ALL THE TIME AND IT IS AWESOME. I can get anywhere I need to go for $2. And there is stuff going on every night. Feels a lot safer than L.A. cuz there's always people on the street. Total classic Jane Jacobs scene. I'm digging it.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)
x-post
Philly is one rough town.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
i dont gte why this dude doesn't live in san francisco i thought that's where all the hippies were
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 July 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
More like a Midwestern city, but with old east coast buildings!
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)
I could give a shit whether anybody knew I'd left. That's another one of those lame Answers he made up a question for. He asked when I was moving to NY and I said Dude I'm already here. Arthur wasn't an "L.A. thing" -- if it was, people would've known we were gone.
The No Age/LA River thing is part of a larger issue having to do with access to nature in general and to the River in particular. Check my "Nature Trumps" blog -- it wasn't just the No Age show they've been going after (and btw, it wasn't cops, it was rangers), they've been ticketing fishermen and duckfeeders. And removing sanctioned graffiti murals. The level of bullshit is high.
re: COPS AND THEIR COPTERS. I've heard one here in the last 5 weeks. In Atwater Village in L.A. we had them almost every night. It's a style of policing they do in L.A. because of the sprawl. Read up on it. It's not that other PDs don't have copters, it's that in LA they have SO MANY and they use them all the time. They're also trained military-style. There's BOOKS on this stuff, dude.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:01 (seventeen years ago)
i miss philly. after i left it became the big hot town for ex-nyc hepcats or something. or that's what i read in the paper. and jess from the gilmore girls opened up a cool publishing house/gallery. i love jess.
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
i just assumed this magazine was from SF
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
dude SF is fucking expeeeeeeeensive!
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
NY is fucking expensive
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:03 (seventeen years ago)
Yes, you're the only one who reads. You are the enlightened hippie living in America's last stand for culture and art, and everyone else in America is a know-nothing. Dork.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:04 (seventeen years ago)
i moved from d.c. to sf. sf was great.
except it only rained for a few months out of the year. that sort of broke me.
i moved from sf to philly.
philly sucks. except it rains sometimes.
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:04 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry, that's how all of us living in the wasteland talk.
-- dell, Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:28 PM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
quebecor, who i work for, pretty much prints everything in existence
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:05 (seventeen years ago)
"There's BOOKS on this stuff, dude."
and every movie about L.A.! i'm kinda scared of L.A. just from scary movies. but intrigued too.
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:05 (seventeen years ago)
also my hood is pretty jane jacobsed out to the max.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:06 (seventeen years ago)
Jane Jacobs wouldn't recognize the NYC of 2008, Jay. I mean, I know you're all stoked about living amongst the Puerto Ricans. But...
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:07 (seventeen years ago)
Right, Arthur's all about the hippies -- that's why we put CONFIRMED HIPPIES Sparks and Diamanda Galas on the cover of the last two issues. Okay.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)
QN - Come to my neighborhood. It has everything she wrote about. Is this neighborhood indicative of ALL OF NYC? Nope. But there are a lot of hoods like this. Stuff happens here that could never in a million years happen in L.A., and I'm enjoying it.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:10 (seventeen years ago)
ILM - conspiring to make sure you don't enjoy what ever you're enjoying at the moment
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:13 (seventeen years ago)
Jay, before we get too bitchy. I know what you're talking about, and it's a super cool thing. My grandparents are from Puerto Rico and Italy and my family grew up in NYC: Little Italy and the Bronx.
But for me, poor people are treated no better there than anywhere else, and those are my family's roots. That's all I'm saying. I lived in Astoria for many years. In my opinion, it's one of NYC's best hoods. But I also know that places like Co-OP City exist, and that they're residents (more like prisoners) have a vasty diff experience of NY.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:17 (seventeen years ago)
Of many dumb things said here, this is a keeper. You're not going to find even a medium-sized city in America that doesn't have quasi-military elements (nee jackbooted thugs) in its police force. Welcome to the 21st century.
― milo z, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
everyone should move to MVI and hang out with me and bob lee
http://bp1.blogger.com/_Ga9VWddYFBA/SISaBELP3KI/AAAAAAAAC0w/CvyOyYvqnHk/s400/6annnouncer.jpg
we freeeeeeeeky
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
BTW, I apologize for my previous comments.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
the no-ac thing will get really old in a couple weeks
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
"Of many dumb things said here"<--this is a keeper.
― gabbneb, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:19 (seventeen years ago)
Shakey otm
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:23 (seventeen years ago)
we have local color here too! sadly, not that many puerto ricans. but tons of brazilians! they are good too! and real live indians. not to mention our lovely portugese population.
http://www.mvtimes.com/images/2008/07/17/calendar/large/pa-feast-folklorico_rs.jpg
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:24 (seventeen years ago)
anyone who doesn't think LA cops are on some next level evil shit should compare their history to that of any other major metropolitan law enforcement agency (with the exception of New Orleans, who are probably the worst hands down) - Rampart scandal, Rodney King, etc etc
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:24 (seventeen years ago)
i should work for the tourist board for real
cops here suck always stealing yer stash
they use helicopters here to find our weed gardens the bastards
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
Philly's record not that great either, what with that whole "let's firebomb an entire city block" thing
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
philly cops suck for real
cops kinda suck
― scott seward, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)
it's kinda their job to suck
word
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:28 (seventeen years ago)
um, do you really need a list of incredibly fucked up things nypd has done in the same time period. just because ny cops don't look like hardcore military dudes like la cops doesn't mean they're less likely to shove a plunger handle up your rectum. la cops are pretty scary looking, i'll give you that.
― velko, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:29 (seventeen years ago)
how are the cops in portland oregon and austin texas
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
Amadou Diallo v. Rodney King
― milo z, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
Austin cop let me off with a warning for doing 80 in a 65 last month, so they're cool
― milo z, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)
LA's Smug problem has magically disappeared, it's amazing!
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)
um, do you really need a list of incredibly fucked up things nypd has done in the same time period.
I wasn't talking about NY, I was responding to Milo's apparent equation of LA cops with cops in any other "medium-sized city in America". which I'm sorry is just not historically accurate.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think it's really that diff, however. I mean, yeah, L.A. has had some high profile stuff go down. But really, dig in the history of East St. Louis or Cleveland or Detroit or Buffalo or Providence or even Boston and you'll find all kinds of heinous stuff. In fact, Boston, in my opinion, has always exhibited a level of racism that's pretty intense.
Hell, what about this guy?
http://img.mediaspanonline.com/6651/2172141.gif
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
how about the canadian mounted police?
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
The cop vs. cop argument is kind of like the Most Racist City in America - guess what, the entire country is fucked up. Deal with it.
― milo z, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
when i first came to l.a. via an internship program they brought in a couple lapd officers to give us the lowdown on safety and one was a totally chill laura harring looking cop and the other looked like bill romanowski. the latter advised us that jaywalkers in l.a. were lawbreakers and if you happened to run one of them over, "no big deal". he also said you should be careful about people pretending to be cops and when a girl asked him what he would do if he pulled her over and asked to see his i.d., he replied, "i'd take you out of the fucking car and put you facefirst on the pavement". then he sort of twitched and the other cop sort of shook her head.
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
*she asked to see his i.d
Yeah, they've been beating up Mohawks for decades now.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
Milo Z - Re LAPD. I don't have my copy of (of course) Mike Davis - CITY OF QUARTZ at hand (guess where it is...) but there's a good potted history of the LAPD in there. IIRC, the LAPD was flushed and rebooted wholesale after WWII in response to (um) rampant corruption. They trained a whole new force according to military principles, since those had just won the war and blah blah blah. The upshot is that cops in L.A. are trained not to be policemen so much as they are an occupying force... This affects the way they talk, the way they carry themselves, the kind of attitude they bring to bear on the population. They are to Establish and Secure Authority at all times. This plays out all the time in pretty scary ways. And yes, it's been replicated since then in other police 'cultures' around the US. Whatever. No point in getting in a 'my cops are worse than your cops' argument. Just sayin.
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
most cops i've met are pretty cool
i'm white btw
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
and even here I would point out that NYers relations w/cops were not so bad that they BURNED DOWN THEIR CITY in response
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
They can't. It's brick.
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)
roflz
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)
sf cops are great! fajita-gate, etc.
all cops suck sorta
but jesus christ, there are better battles to be fought if you wanna get into some hc polarization shit
c'mon, now.
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:43 (seventeen years ago)
ah fajita-gate. good times.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:45 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, i dunno at this point
i would like to live somewhere next to the ocean
weirdly enough, sf was the only place that i have lived post-hs and been on the receiving end of homophobic comments (i ain't even gay, so go figure)
again, i would like to live somewhere next to the ocean
everyone seems to have a litany of complaints regarding where they live and where they've lived in the past. god knows i do.
and again, jay has made a rad magazine out of nothing, which is more than i can say for myself!
pls interview dale pendell, etc...
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:57 (seventeen years ago)
I love SF, but it is expensive. I now live in the South/Appalachia, which I adore as much as any place I've ever lived. So go figure!
― QuantumNoise, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
oh, i forgot to add that i would alternatively like to live near mountains! california is an easy target, b/c there is mountains/ocean in close proximity
but i would be cool being in mountains, i think
plus southern ppl are friendly!! no, but, it's true!
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:03 (seventeen years ago)
nah I love SF, I have no real complaints. I mean yeah I hate the cops here but I would probably hate the cops anywhere. It's my way.
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:03 (seventeen years ago)
More laffs on the LATimes "comments' -- HOW DARE I SPEAK ILL OF THE MIGHTY KCRW, LISTENED TO FROM COAST TO COAST????
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:07 (seventeen years ago)
i understand fully. i visited the bay area last month and it was the highlight of my yr thusfar.
when i lived there, it was whole 'nother story entirely-- i was totally miserable for the bulk of it, on a personal level. but, if yr gonna be miserable, you might as well be miserable among beautiful surroundings. e.g., go freak yr neurosis out in hawaii...or alaska...or the himalayas
― dell, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
In the end, the people that seem to dig L.A. the most -- or cheerlead for it hardest -- are the ones who can afford to insulate themselves from its faults. These are the people who send their kids to private schools, only get their health care at Cedars-Sinai or UCLA, live up in the Hills beyond the shit and the crime and the ever-dumber billboards and the random shootings and the shitty stucco-and-plastic architecture and miles-long shopping malls that all the rest of us have to live amongst.
None of this applies to me in the LEAST and I love L.A. and cheerlead hard. I spent multiple years living at Vermont and 129th St.; on Sycamore Ave. in Hollywood; and Downtown.
But I realized we live in two way different universes when you were psyched about the lack of A.C. in your pad!
I fear you may see that NYC cops aren't that much more awesome than L.A. ones, though, on the South side of Williamsburg.
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:13 (seventeen years ago)
The times article's comments
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:18 (seventeen years ago)
Weird. I'm not typing that out again. Oh well.
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:20 (seventeen years ago)
the LA Times is, for my money, the best written paper in America.
lolololo
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)
http://gawker.com/5028824/la-give-brooklyn-your-tired-your-poor-your-weary
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
http://blogs.laweekly.com/play/la-to-arthur-magazine-can-we-h/
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:30 (seventeen years ago)
But I'm sure he'll find the New Times' syndicated content that fills The Village Voice to be far superior to the New Times' syndicated content that fills the L.A. Weekly.
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:31 (seventeen years ago)
second place in less than 10 minutes where I've seen someone imply Jay is a coke-snorting trustfunder oh teh lolz
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
I think 99% of them are saying he's a smug douchebag, so for two people to stretch that a little further, really is to be expected.
― jeff, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
^^^
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)
B-b-b-but I didn't say those terrible things. Egads. Now I understand why some interviewees record their interviews...
― jaybabcock, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:45 (seventeen years ago)
don't worry jay, no press is bad press ;)
― oscar, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
anyway lol @ comments section guy calling little joy a coke den, the dude just sits back there and chills and reads new yorker.
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 22:52 (seventeen years ago)
have you even read the new yorker dude
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:01 (seventeen years ago)
jay what do you think about the cover of the new yorker
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:03 (seventeen years ago)
i imagine that the la times guy must have had a bone to pick or wanted to create some "controversy", assuming the context of the comments is completely missing
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:03 (seventeen years ago)
no kidding
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:04 (seventeen years ago)
but still i really don't think l.a. is any worse than nyc except in terms of public transportation and lack of snow and constant presence of cobrasnake
― omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:07 (seventeen years ago)
Cobrasnake is never at El Cholo when I am eating mind blowing Green Corn Tamales and having unbelievable non-Mary Ann's margaritas
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:22 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i can't imagine a better place for food anywhere.
― strgn, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
i find it very easy to avoid cobrasnake or anything cobrasnake-related.
― dan, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:37 (seventeen years ago)
but i'm also able to avoid dumb and shallow people and bad experiences with the lapd. i'm unusually blessed.
― dan, Thursday, 24 July 2008 23:43 (seventeen years ago)
ay i just moved east from LA and while im not actually living in nyc im spending a lot of time there and even tho i have a lot of affection for LA i can totally understand this sentiment:
IT IS LOUD ALL THE TIME AND IT IS AWESOME. I can get anywhere I need to go for $2. And there is stuff going on every night. Feels a lot safer than L.A. cuz there's always people on the street. Total classic Jane Jacobs scene. I'm digging it.
ESPECIALLY "I can get anywhere I need to go for $2"
― max, Friday, 25 July 2008 00:02 (seventeen years ago)
yo I'm jealous of that shit
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Friday, 25 July 2008 00:15 (seventeen years ago)
plus the fucking cops made the taco truck near my work stay away from this area for a few days
― uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Friday, 25 July 2008 00:16 (seventeen years ago)
For a while, I've been thinking that those two cities cater to different age demographics
― baaderonixx, Friday, 25 July 2008 08:54 (seventeen years ago)
How do you see it split?
― Savannah Smiles, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:07 (seventeen years ago)
yah jay's ny sentiments make a lot of sense to me, but then i've only visited ny. san francisco has a similar "omg, people are WALKING... on the STREET" feeling to it, but you know, i've only visited.
i'm pretty sick and tired of l.a., but i'm ready to grant that it has more to do with my neighborhood and state of mind than anything. in my (limited) experience, the easter you go (before the end of the san gabriel valley), the better it gets.
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:14 (seventeen years ago)
i meet so many douches here though. more than in salt lake city, utah! don't know what that says about me or means...
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)
xp I'd say LA maybe feels a bit empty when you hit early adulthood and becomes awesome again in your mid-30's?
― baaderonixx, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)
OTM
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:16 (seventeen years ago)
or: it's a bad place to move after going to college in some shithole to try and meet people. i'm sure n.y. is just as bad or worse. i dunno
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:18 (seventeen years ago)
this might be a challops but people in l.a. get SO defensive when they're compared to people in ny. hence that 400+ reply in l.a. weekly to mr. babcock's screed. and responses i've heard in local crowds to ny bands here...
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:22 (seventeen years ago)
l.a. gets a weird bad rap
yeah, i would totally hate living in a city that hugs the ocean and is relatively affordable and has all kinds of commensurate cultural shit going on
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:40 (seventeen years ago)
Have you ever lived there?
― baaderonixx, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:42 (seventeen years ago)
?
― strgn, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:44 (seventeen years ago)
what the hell is a challops?
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:44 (seventeen years ago)
"challenging opinion". the phrase was originated on glenn beck's television program in the late '00's
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:51 (seventeen years ago)
no, just visited. but i like it!
what don't you like about it??...assuming that you totally and completely hate it
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:52 (seventeen years ago)
What relatively bothers me in LA and what might make the Brooklyn grass so much greener is how hard it is to spontaneously hang out. Everything feels really atomised and for a city that prides itself on its laidback carefree attitude, a lot of things require planning I find.
― baaderonixx, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:55 (seventeen years ago)
A lot of that is related to the constant driving I guess
― baaderonixx, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:56 (seventeen years ago)
WELL WHY DON'T YOU GO ROLL UP AND SMOKE THE LATEST COPY OF ARTHUR, YOU SHIFTLESS HIPPIE? LET'S LET IT "ALL HANG OUT"! LET'S JUST GROOVE W/THE SPONTANEITY PROGRAMM!
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:59 (seventeen years ago)
I'd like to see if the reporter really 'fabricated' your obnoxious quotations. I don't buy it for a fucking second.
― teflon monkey, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:04 (seventeen years ago)
Arthur's response
fyi interview was not tape-recorded, journo was going from notes, and then the quotes got chopped up
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:06 (seventeen years ago)
but thanks for sharing
i didn't know jay was your brother. is he really your brother? wait, is your name actually shakey babcock?
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
lolz I wish
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:22 (seventeen years ago)
my name is actually Rusty Shackleford
hey, by the way, i keep forgetting to mention that i dug that album you sent me. that was you, right? yeah, very weird and cool. i was a little scared that it was gonna be some indie flaming lips kinda bummer trip, but no way it was decent!
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:23 (seventeen years ago)
oh but yes Jay and I are brothers. and Quitty from the Tight Bros/Nudity/a million other Olympia bands is our cousin. and Ev and Ryan from 12 Rods are also our cousins.
and now you know the family tree
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:24 (seventeen years ago)
I sent you a record? Great! even better that you dug it. I am not into bummer trips and the only good Flaming Lips is oooooooooold Flaming Lips
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)
my brother looks like this.
http://a739.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/55/l_4e620128eb9062dbd19cb35ace2a9922.jpg
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
"quebecor, who i work for, pretty much prints everything in existence"
We used to print there, but now we've switched to Transcontinental, who are in Boucherville, Quebec. Because Quebec PRINTS EVERYTHING EVER. (One of the funny things is that some of our issues, we can't sell in Canada, but we can print 'em there).
― I eat cannibals, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
and this:
http://a570.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/64/l_066f11729b0fa0ed6649f3492161ff51.jpg
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
weird, that's my name, too!
i saw your ex-band play at cafe du nord circa 2001?
it was fun. there was a saxophone and stuff
you guys committed!
i don't ask for anything else
also, best flyer artwork ever!
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
aw thanks
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:36 (seventeen years ago)
why ain't Dan been posting lately, Scott?
― Merdeyeux, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:46 (seventeen years ago)
I was gonna say - isn't that dan bunnybrains?!?
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:47 (seventeen years ago)
I wish everyone used their real names.
― Mark Rich@rdson, Saturday, 26 July 2008 00:03 (seventeen years ago)
danny is busy on a top secret project that will blow the musikal underverse away. for real. and he is busy opening up a new store space in hudson.
― scott seward, Saturday, 26 July 2008 00:29 (seventeen years ago)
dell - yup, dale pendall is on the list, fer shure.
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
tl;dr
the interview just reads like the usual thing where someone gets bored of living somewhere but makes up some b.s. grandiose reasons for why they're moving. i do this all the time re: richmond, va., except in that case all the grandiose reasons are true
― n/a, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
n/a - yup, it does read that way, doesn't it?
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
kinda yeah
― remy bean, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
ny vs. la, sydney vs. melbourne, seattle vs. portland, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
― Mackro Mackro, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
i don't mean that to be rude at all -- hell, i was an arthur subscriber and adherent -- but the thing is that any city, any town, any lugar is at best a muttly mix of neutral charges, plus charges, and minus charges. and when people leave a place, any place, they often try to encapsulate, crystellize, codify their experience in that geographic/cultural/political/social landscape too glibly, reductively, authoritatively in a way they would not if they still lived there. seeking closure through final judgement. metropolitan post-partum.
contributing to the characterization of a departed city is, i am certain, a predominantly biographical act. if homages (any stripe -- encomium or excoriating) are read as treatise on their location, taken immediately as what they're written, they are sure to come off as grandiose. if they are taken as personal narratives of leaving proxied through places they are ostensibly about, they can offer a whole lot more.
― remy bean, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
remy - coke v pepsi, blahblah. totally agree.
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
oops meant mackro not remy
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
remy - yup
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
Has anyone on here with a subscription already received the latest issue (the one with Spiritualized)?
I'm still waiting on mine...
― Moodles, Saturday, 23 August 2008 02:11 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.arthurmag.com/
01/09/2009A NOTE ABOUT ARTHUR MAGAZINE'S FUTURE, FROM ITS EDITOR/PUBLISHER.Hey gang--
I am done with self-publishing Arthur, which I've been doing since July, 2007. It's too much work for one person to edit, publish and manage a national magazine, month after month, year after year.
If/when a publishing partner appears, and so on, Arthur will return to print.
That could be in three days, three months or three years.
Or never, given how the internet plus leveraged capital has hollowed out almost all existing analog mass media in favor of stuff that, in almost all cases, is qualitatively worse for almost everybody.
Anyway, we're gonna hibernate the mag for the time being, and focus on the stuff that doesn't have as much financial risk or management burden. Thanks to the work of a lot of Arthur folks, the arthurmag internet presence will upgrade and expand greatly in the coming days. Also, two new cds and a dvd are being prepared, the book(s) are on the way, and so on.
We're staying busy, staying focused on what we can handle, and pushing homegrown counter-culture forward. We hope you can, too.
And if you need more Arthur mags right now...well, there's 31 back issues available in the store.
All love and R.I.P. Ron Asheton,
Jay Babcockeditor/publisher, Arthur Magazineedi✧✧✧@arthur✧✧✧.c✧✧
― maura, Friday, 9 January 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)
Hmmn.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
Open an Arthur Store on the Mendocino Coast, have a little club next door, and all will be good.
― Eazy, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
Eazy - Hahahaha! Indeed
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Arthur Store is currently my house if anyone's wondering where their orders are
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
HAHA
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
I'm serious!
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
I know I'm just imagining the little club next to your house.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
Hey Shakey, is the shop open?
― (*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・) °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
Like, can you come by and rifle through the back issues? Not exactly. I might make a special exception in your case though...
otherwise you gotta order through the website like any other joe lunchpail
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
Damn. Sorry about the shitty state of publishing, Jay and Arthur. You will be missed. :(
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:04 (seventeen years ago)
note to business model: free is not money
― Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:05 (seventeen years ago)
Creeps: Eyeballs equals ads equals revenue. Etc.
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
I know, just goofin. I love the idea of a free magazine anyway, and love Arthur more. So thanks, Jay, for everything, especially for giving me a way to see Arik Roper on a semi reg basis. And for the two guys who'd drink beers and listen to racords.
― Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
Creeps - Ha! Cheers for all that. We'll see what happens. I'm getting some feelers.
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
back from the dead
― the choogler and the chosen one (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 August 2012 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
Meaning this?
http://arthurmag.tumblr.com/
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 August 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
And almost ten years to the day this thread was started...
http://arthurmag.com/2012/11/15/arthur-returns-to-life-december-22-2012/
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)
sweet! i don't know anything about the economics of putting something like this out, but doing away with the "free" model seems like a good idea? I mean, I'm certainly willing to pay $5 for it.
― tylerw, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:21 (thirteen years ago)
yaay :)
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)
I'm certainly willing to pay $5 for it.
me too!
― sleeve, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:41 (thirteen years ago)
Great news
― Trip Maker, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)
YES
― Z S, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:24 (thirteen years ago)
tylerw - This business model will work for these times. The old model had a chance to succeed, but stuff happened, and I don't have the resources to try it again...and, also, I'm not sure it would work now, given what I know of the state of advertising budgets.
― jaywbabcock, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
This is great.
― in an English way (flamboyant goon tie included), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)
AND -- in this new incarnation of Arthur, everyone who contributes to the magazine ACTUALLY GETS PAID and NOBODY GOES INTO $120K OF DEBT. Very grateful to our readers for making this new reality possible.
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:50 (thirteen years ago)
are you looking for contributors? because i could write a monthly column about neil young bootlegs.
― tylerw, Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:59 (thirteen years ago)
this is great news!
my first thought today was wondering what arthur's coverage is gon be like in 2012 considering the underground has long since moved on from crunchy folk nu-weird off the gridism and high-art-aspirational hipster metal and is now just I HAVE A TUMBLR AND A KAOSS PAD ON NOM NOM GIVE ME ALL THE MOUNTAIN DEW MONEY
― tome crues (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 17 November 2012 03:21 (thirteen years ago)
Whiney -
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/a29cover.jpg
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:26 (thirteen years ago)
More for Whiney -
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/a13cover.jpg
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:34 (thirteen years ago)
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/arthur5cover.jpg
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:40 (thirteen years ago)
One more for the Whinester -
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/a28coversml.jpg
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:46 (thirteen years ago)
Who should I touch base with to become a contributor, Jay?
― Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 17 November 2012 05:08 (thirteen years ago)
this is the best news.
and $5 is a killer deal. i wouldnt even blink at $10.
now jay: any chance at another run of tuff wizard shirts?
― alpine static, Saturday, 17 November 2012 05:16 (thirteen years ago)
I'd always meant to subscribe but it was free at the record store, so, uh. But now, problem solved, money sent.
― Mike Dixn, Saturday, 17 November 2012 05:44 (thirteen years ago)
I just wanted to let jay know that the essay about the AK-47 has stuck with me all these years.
― sarahell, Saturday, 17 November 2012 07:36 (thirteen years ago)
awesome AWESOME news
― Chuck_Norris_on_the_topic_of_obesity (stevie), Saturday, 17 November 2012 13:13 (thirteen years ago)
Thanks ladies. Raymond, you can touch base with me. Alpine Static - I dunno. Sarahell - I know, right?
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
And Mike Dixn: Thx for the dough. Glad you had a store that carried Arthur in the old days — which one was it?
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:47 (thirteen years ago)
I admit I should say something more having posted that link and all. Got a couple of ideas kicking around...
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 November 2012 19:56 (thirteen years ago)
fwiw fyi there is this: New York Times - Media Decoder
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 20:35 (thirteen years ago)
Also, something that wasn't mentioned in that initial announcement and didn't get picked up in the Times piece was this, and I can't emphasize it enough really: In this new incarnation of Arthur, everyone who contributes to the magazine actually gets paid. In the old days it was labor love and credit cards for everybody but the art directors (who worked way way way below market rate) and ad salespeople (who worked strictly commission — a hard way to be). This is made possible by the readers. And of course, it is made possible by the fact that Arthur existed previously... so the new reality of Arthur, like most new realities, is built on a combination of new sitch plus past blood, sweat and tears.
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 20:39 (thirteen years ago)
all the best with this, jay. fantastic news and the business model seems sound - ideal, in fact. i hope to see (and buy) it in the UK at some point.
― jed_, Saturday, 17 November 2012 20:42 (thirteen years ago)
jed - thank you, it took four years in the wilderness (3 of those kinda literally! haha) to get back to this place. I was able to avoid bankruptcy, that was one of the main things. Oy. So many people have been so generous. As for getting the mag in the UK: I would advise pre-ordering it direct from us.
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 20:47 (thirteen years ago)
I sent you a message on FB, Jay
― Raymond Cummings, Saturday, 17 November 2012 22:46 (thirteen years ago)
<i>Glad you had a store that carried Arthur in the old days — which one was it?<i>Reckless Records and Laurie's Planet of Sound in Chicago. I'm pretty sure I picked up almost every issue - maybe not the first few, looking at your cover gallery, #3 might have been my first - at one of those places and passed them off along with the latest Roctobers to a trucker friend whenever he was in town.
― Mike Dixn, Sunday, 18 November 2012 00:37 (thirteen years ago)
Information for people who wish to contribute to Arthur's editorial content
― jaywbabcock, Sunday, 18 November 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)
Thanks
― Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 18 November 2012 21:02 (thirteen years ago)
Mike Dixn: That's right, making mags for needy truckers since '02. Thanks for passing it along...
― jaywbabcock, Monday, 19 November 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)
My new-Arthur wishlist:
As much Erik Davis as possible
Original comics content (by which I just mean comics done for the mag as opposed to coverage/reviews of comics)
― you only write about... pleassssure (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:48 (thirteen years ago)
Jon Lewis: You will like Arthur No. 33 very much on the second count—I think. First count, not so much... but Erik will be back later.
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:52 (thirteen years ago)
Cool x 2.
Actually, are you reviewing comics/graphic novels as well? I wanna make sure my publisher (who does Gabrielle Bell, James Romberger, me and others) has you on his comp list...
― you only write about... pleassssure (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:19 (thirteen years ago)
Hey there Jay, I subscribed right before you stopped printing and only ever received the Sparks and Galas issues. Any chance my subscription will be re-started?
― Moodles, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
Jon - Byron & Thurston review comics/graphic novels all the time.
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:27 (thirteen years ago)
Moodies - Check it out: http://arthurmag.com/info-for-old-subscribers/
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:29 (thirteen years ago)
cool, we'll use the submission-for-review info for Bull Tongue on that link you posted earlier.
xpost
― you only write about... pleassssure (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 28 November 2012 23:33 (thirteen years ago)
has arthur the magazine ever written about arthur the russell?just a thought...
― t**t, Thursday, 29 November 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)
t**t - no. not sure there's a need at this point, given all the coverage elsewhere. tell me if there is...
― jaywbabcock, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:51 (thirteen years ago)
Heya Jay, dropped a line via the submissions link the other day, dunno if you got it...
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 November 2012 23:52 (thirteen years ago)
Ned - Nope... Weird! Hmm.
― jaywbabcock, Friday, 30 November 2012 04:00 (thirteen years ago)
Ned - Thx for pointing this out. Some email was not being forwarded. Now it is. AWLLLLRITE!
― jaywbabcock, Friday, 30 November 2012 04:32 (thirteen years ago)
man, this Arthur thing has been lacking
― Andrew Sandwich, Friday, 30 November 2012 04:33 (thirteen years ago)
glad you're back
"Jay, I wasn't an Arthur subscriber for a long period of time (issue 27 with Celebration was when I began), but it had a profound affect on my while it was in my life. Just wanted to say thanks upon thanks."
lol gmail search
― Andrew Sandwich, Friday, 30 November 2012 04:49 (thirteen years ago)
Andrew - Too much!
― jaywbabcock, Friday, 30 November 2012 22:16 (thirteen years ago)
Byron Coley & Thurston Moore just handed in their columnage for first new Arthur in 4 years. Psyched to get to publish these old dudes again.
― jaywbabcock, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
Ha! Cool
Jay I will have a second pitch for you soon, the wheels are grinding
― Raymond Cummings, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:44 (thirteen years ago)
Jay, will the 'no ads except on back cover' thing be an ongoing standard? Is that one big ad or several smaller ones? Curious for my publisher.
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:25 (thirteen years ago)
Jon - Probably, yeah. Back coverS, actually, as there are two sections — in this issue, at least. Maybe in the next issue, there will be 3 sections, who knows. Ads are a real bitch to handle for a ton of reasons, and we protect ourselves by limiting them in this way. It's worked out really well for us. Your publisher can get in touch with us thru normal channels.
― jaywbabcock, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:42 (thirteen years ago)
fwiw - http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/arthur33cover.jpg?w=450&h=682
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:43 (thirteen years ago)
Dig it
― Trip Maker, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:44 (thirteen years ago)
lookin' good. psyched for the jack rose feature. three years since he passed away!
― tylerw, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)
3 years to the day. Very spooky.
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)
looks AMAZING
― That symptom is fucking my wife (stevie), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:52 (thirteen years ago)
Oops - meant to add - here's some more details on contents and how to get a copy and so on, if you're interested - Arthur website
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:55 (thirteen years ago)
love that
― alpine static, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:57 (thirteen years ago)
rip jack rose
My copy came in the mail today. I haven't cracked it open yet, but the cover looks fantastic.
― Mike Dixn, Tuesday, 18 December 2012 01:12 (thirteen years ago)
resurrected arthur is a thing of beauty!
― tylerw, Friday, 28 December 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)
Just got my copy yesterday
― Elvis Telecom, Friday, 28 December 2012 19:56 (thirteen years ago)
New issue is at the printer. 8 more color pages, more music coverage in this issue than last one.
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/a34coversml.jpg
After 20-plus years navigating strange, inspiring trips across myriad underground psychedelic terrains with a host of fellow free folk, righteous musician/head MATT VALENTINE (MV&EE, Tower Recordings, etc) finally spills all possible beans in an unprecedented, career-summarizing, ridiculously footnoted epic interview by BYRON COLEY. Plus: Deep archival photo finds from the MV vaults, a sidebar wander through some important MV listening experiences with your guide Dan Ireton, and a gorgeous cover painting by ARIK ROPER of MV & EE at peace in the cosmic wild. Delicious!
Also in this issue:
Psychedelic scholars Christian Ratsch and Claudia Muller-Ebeling lay down a rap about this planet’s AROMATIC APHRODISIACS, with art by Kira Mardikes…
Gabe Soria chats with author AUSTIN GROSSMAN (Soon I Will Be Invincible) about the basic weirdness of playing (and making) VIDEO GAMES, with art by Ron Rege, Jr….
LA Record’s Chris Ziegler encounters young Southern California psych-rock band FEEDING PEOPLE, with photography by Ward Robinson…
All-new full-color comics by Lale Westvind, Will Sweeney, Vanessa Davis and Jonny Negron…
A lengthy interview with the remarkable ecstatic cartographer DAVID CHAIM SMITH by Jay Babcock, with massive reproductions of his out-of-time artwork…
Stewart Voegtlin on what (or: who) made MELVINS’ 1992 beercrusher “Lysol” the most unlikely religious record ever built, with art by Stewart’s Chips N Beer mag compatriot Beaver…
Columns by the ever-provocative “Weedeater” Nance Klehm and The Center for Tactical Magic…
Byron Coley and Thurston Moore’s essential underground review column, Bull Tongue, now expanded to two giant pages…
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 23 February 2013 18:05 (thirteen years ago)
http://adhoc.fm/post/arthur-magazine-calling-it-quits-again/
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 14:37 (twelve years ago)
online mail-order Arthur Store will be open until March 2, 2014. At that point, all unsold backstock will be chucked on the compost heap or into the recycle bin.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 14:50 (twelve years ago)
Shakey Mo's decided not to store this junk any longer basically.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:00 (twelve years ago)
That's a real shame.
― you are clinically deaf and should sell you iPod (stevie), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 15:04 (twelve years ago)
now now. (ftr all Arthur material was moved long ago to a super-secret airtight underground bunker way out in the middle of the desert in Joshua Tree)
but yeah buy up that shit! posterity demands it
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 17:41 (twelve years ago)
bummed, i was really enjoying the new arthurs, but i definitely understand that it was a labor of love for all involved.
― tylerw, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 17:47 (twelve years ago)
just bought some stuff, I really needed that cassette comp with the Michael Hurley tune so thanks for the bump even if it's bad news
― sleeve, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 17:59 (twelve years ago)
Thanks Tyler, yeah the energy for doing this proj has diminished for so many reasons — at least it wasn't financial this time! — but we'll see what happens in the future. Sleeve, thanks friend, your stuff is already in the mail.
― jaywbabcock, Tuesday, 18 February 2014 23:45 (twelve years ago)
the fact that adhoc lives while arthur dies is completely fucked
― *plop* son (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 February 2014 23:47 (twelve years ago)
Whiney - I would hesitate to draw any conclusions. Arthur's existence has always been precarious and contingent on so many things..
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 00:25 (twelve years ago)
Jay am I correct that you are sold out of all the "new" issues other than the Hurley one? I would have sprung for those as well but didn't see them.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 01:22 (twelve years ago)
Sleeve - Yeah 33 (Rick Veitch/Jack Rose/etc issue) and 34 (Matt Valentine/David Chaim Smith/Feeding People/etc) are gone now. Sorry bout that...
― jaywbabcock, Wednesday, 19 February 2014 01:46 (twelve years ago)
Sleeve & others - I came across a few more copies of some issues that I thought were all gone, including the Brightblack/Godsmack/Derrick Jensen issue, and the Devendra/Joanna Newsom/Cocorosie issue...so those are all now available in the Store, til close date, which is this coming Sunday. But no 33 or 34, sorry.
― jaywbabcock, Monday, 24 February 2014 20:29 (twelve years ago)
Spoke too soon. Just found 7 more copies of 34 (MV issue).
― jaywbabcock, Monday, 24 February 2014 20:56 (twelve years ago)
LOL well OK then, guess I'd better head back to yer website
by the way I already got that package, thanks! loving the CD comp...
― sleeve, Monday, 24 February 2014 21:07 (twelve years ago)
The fact that Rolling Stone lives while Arthur dies is even more fucked.
― Position Position, Monday, 24 February 2014 22:08 (twelve years ago)
Farewell, Arthur.
― alpine static, Monday, 3 March 2014 08:07 (twelve years ago)
Arthur Magazine archive finally complete
This took forever, but I am very glad to be able to write this morning that the entire run of Arthur magazine (2002-2008, 2012-13), which I co-founded and edited, is finally available online as single issue PDFs.
― Kim Kimberly, Thursday, 3 July 2025 21:13 (nine months ago)
Pretty great!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 July 2025 21:29 (nine months ago)
Yay! No 3d glasses though
― sarahell, Friday, 4 July 2025 03:03 (nine months ago)
oh great, I think I learned about both ayahuasca and Pandit Pran Nath from a single (free!) ish of this.
― doe on a hill (Deflatormouse), Friday, 4 July 2025 03:36 (nine months ago)