Do you still buy vinyl?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well, do you? And what and why? Do you buy used vinyl only now, or do you still get new albums on vinyl? Without getting into a hi-fi debate, does vinyl sound better, worse, the same or just different? Is it better for some kinds of music?

Personally, I buy hardly any vinyl at all now, maybe the odd used 12-inch or rare-ish unreissued album. But I still play my old vinyl regularly.

The reason I ask is that I noticed that someone had bought the Amnesiac on vinyl (Masonic Boom - was it you?), and I was wondering.

Over to You.

Dr. C, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes. Predominantly dance singles and second-hand vinyl. Purists claim the bass sounds better with the former, but with me its more a matter of no other format being available (plus a not yet realised ambition to get twin decks and a mixer). I buy more CDs though.

Stevo, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

At the moment, no. Mostly because I don't have a turntable - something I'll be sorting out next month - so it's a choice between getting something for my infrequent DJing exploits or actually being able to listen to it.

But I like vinyl and will start buying it again soon I'm sure.

Tom, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I really only buy vinyl once in a great while: mostly older stuff that I find used, or things that are hard to find on other formats, like certain dance/electronic singles.

I really love vinyl as a format: there's something so nice about seeing a nice big album cover and an illustrated picture sleeve. I guess I enjoy the graphics aspect of it. The sound quality isn't that much different, imho, though I do know certain vinyl purists who will tell you how much warmer vinyl sounds compared to sterile cds. I just don't hear that.

I don't buy much vinyl anymore mainly because it isn't portable, and I like to have cds take to work to listen to and also have in my car, etc. etc. etc.

Nicole, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I would like to buy vinyl from time to time, but as with Tom, I have no turntable so it's a pointless thing for me to get. The only vinyl I have now is up on my wall as artwork, still in its sleeve.

I actually own a lot of vinyl but I left it in Arizona with my dad because he had a turntable at the time. But his broke and now he has no use for them either. I keep asking him to stay his hand on selling them because I want them back one day.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I usuallyl buy Vinyl if its something odd that I can't find on Cd, like 50 Guitars in Love, or if its a band I creme for, or if its a recor din good shape thats cheap. I usually convert them to Minidisc though, I hate using vinyl. I once found an "Otis and Ally" , original. Its hanging in my oven.

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

yeah, only format i do buy pretty much. yeah nearly all 2nd hand. 'cause (a) i haven't got a CD player that works (b) i'm a real cheapskate (mainly only buy what's lying around , not keep up with the new stuff) (c) am old, it's the format i started with. yes you can still find lots good that way but yes i am starting to find it restrictive ...

duane zarakov, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In the weird wild world of Record Company economics, vinyl is still cheaper retail compared to CD's (correct me if I'm wrong, it's been a while since I bought vinyl) despite being more expensive to manufacture.

I went to Camelot the other day and almost fainted at the sight of a $18.95 CD. Time to dust off the turntable.

Steven James, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes: two good reasons - contrary to late '80s myth, I have a lot less trouble with scratched records than skipping CDs, and secondly because CDs just go on so fucking long - I have no interest in listening to 70 or 80 minutes of anything in one sitting, whereas 20 minutes seems just right, and if you're digging it, you can put on the other side. Sure, I buy CDs, but generaly when there is no alternative (or the vinyl is way more expensive). (My ten year old nephew recently asked his dad to tape him some songs off "those big discs you have")

Mark Morris, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Avoiding discussions abt sound superiority - Swans fucked my hearing at the ICA years ago, so am oblivious to nuances of 'warmth' etc. - I'd pick CDs over vinyl every time, and am only tempted by recs when they're limited edition 'rarities' (whatever) that you simply can't get on CD. You can program a CD, you don't have to get up and flip it over, they don't build up surface noise, they're easier to carry/transport/store, you can fit more music on 'em etc. etc. Only advantages to vinyl that I can see is that you can speed 'em up or slow 'em down, the covers/packaging look better, and the idea of djing with cds just seems...silly.

Andrew L, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Absolutely, I still buy vinyl. Well, actually, I started buying it a couple years ago when my mom gave me her old turntable. I noticed how damned CHEAP I could get stuff on vinyl, and I have gradually amassed quite a few records, most for between 2 and 5 bucks, quite a few for under a dollar. I'm really not a vinyl fetishist at all, although I do think some things sound incredibly good on record, especially if they were recorded with analog technology ("...this Compact Disc reveals the limitations of the source tape," etc.)--such full, warm bass. I do think vinyl is pretty inconvenient, though, and easily damaged, so if I can get something on CD, I usually will (i.e. new stuff). My main motivation for buying vinyl is not having that much dough but being a compulsive music consumer.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Which is why I started buying vinyl - too poor to buy a CD player in my youth.

However, I do have to ask something: maybe I've only been looking into rarer vinyl these days, though I don't reckon I'm looking for things particularly obscure, but everything I try to buy on vinyl LATELY is unreasonably more expensive than a CD, or than I remember it being when I was younger. Granted, since I'm only buying them for the artwork right now, I justify the expense in my mind by pointing out to myself that buying the French ads that I"m so fond of set me back way more than an expensive vinyl. But everything's like $30 or more. Which I can understand for things like the Motown Junk vinyl, but for beaten up madonna albums?

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If it came out before 1990, when new vinyl records pretty much disappeared off the face of the earth (or at least Canada), then I try to get it on vinyl. It has nothing to do with sound - on *my* stereo, CDs sure sound a hell of a lot better. I started out doing this because, well, I had no CD player at the time, plus LPs were a hell of a lot cheaper, though that's not as true as it used to be. Plus like Nicole, I have a big album cover fetish - I just love the way the good ones look.

I'm still pretty astounded by the *hostility* which new-converts-to- CDs started exhibiting towards vinyl, the minute CDs started getting big... I understand record companies wanting buyers to pay 5-10 extra dollars for the same damn thing, but why music fans started getting this attitude of "now that CDs are out there, vinyl shouldn't be available to anyone at all ever", I'll never know. Spending 20-25 $ for every record you buy is just nuts

Patrick, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't understand those people who reckon vinyl is better than CD. The cover art and stuff is lovelier, yes, but there's nothing to ruin a good song like the bloody record getting stuck. And as for 'better sound', yeah, records are great if you like the sound of frying things in the kitchen or Rice Krispies. Sorry, I don't mean to sound too negative, but once again it's the NME's fault for trying to preach to me (ages ago) the virtues of vinyl, and as usual ending up pissing me off.

DG, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah, I know what you all mean about vinyl being expensive as all hell, but I never buy new vinyl. The only new vinyl I've bought has been a few cutouts that were 4 bucks. The most I've ever spent on a record was 10 bucks, for Unknown Pleasures and another time for a live Albert Ayler record. Best ever find: Gang of Four's Solid Gold for a dollar at a thrift store.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still buy vinyl. Why? Cover art's better, they're still cheaper, on my half decent home turntable they sound better than cds when new and it's easier to DJ with records. However, CDs sound better in the long term, I can listen to them at work, it's difficult to find stuff on vinyl and I've recently discovered that I can DJ with cds whilst in a state of extreme drunkenness.

Also, that old scratching thing is just not true. Once a CD is scratched it's utterly fucked, whereas a jump on a record can be remedied by the judicious use of a 2p piece. I have exactly one record that's unplayable (out of a few hundred) and three cds (out of a similar number) that jump like buggery.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Richard, what's that? I'm curious, as a few of my favorite LPs (Trans-Europe Express) have a jump, and seeing as I'm an anal tool, I'd love to rememdy them.

Clarke B., Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I once spent $20 for a vintage vinyl copy of Scott 4 even though I have a cd copy -- I couldn't help it, I just have to buy all things scott walker. It's like an illness.

But with new vinyl -- I remember seeing that double vinyl of Kid A for about $28 maybe? That's just ridiculous. At least you can usually find cds much cheaper than that, especially when there's sales.

Nicole, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A 2p piece is a coin of roughly the right weight to put atop the cartridge to stop the stylus skipping. Play through the skip a few times with the 2p on and this usually deepens/'straightens' the groove enough to stop the skipping altogether. Warning: this almost always leads to a loss of sound quality, and works best on recent scratches.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You lot all need to take better care of your CDs. Am I the only person without one single CD that skips? Actually, this isn't true. My copy of Let's Get It On skips, but that's because it's not MY copy, as I sold my copy when I moved back home. It's actually Fred's copy, and I'd say about 35% of his CDs skip cos he takes awful care of them.

I suppose this is another thread but why doesn't anyone take decent care of their CDs? They're not meant to be tossed around or thrown shiny-side-down on a desktop or anything like that. I almost came to blows with the IT guy at my workplace for taking my copy of THB out of my computer at work and hurling it, VIOLENTLY, face-down on the desk (he apparently does this to everyone, and I was left unwarned that you're meant to clean out all disks from your computer if you know he's coming because he tries to break things). I told him that if I took it home and it skipped, I'd hunt him down, and I would.

My CDs are all in fantastic condition, so I'm wondering what everyone does to make their CDs skip so much :)

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But Ally, when CDs first came on the market they were marketed as the records you COULDN'T break/fuck up. Totally not true, of course, but this must have encouraged people's less reverent treatment of 'em...

Andrew L, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

See, I don't remember the original CD marketing (other than those ridiculous enormous boxes they came in - what the hell?), but you'd think after you screwed up your first CD, you'd be more careful.

I suppose I was always careful with them because I couldn't really afford them and had to pay with my own cash, etc, so I was like, oh, don't want to screw this up and have to shell out another $15, let's be nice to this one.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Count me in as the digital fetishist. ;-) I haven't bought one thing on vinyl since I got my first CD player in 1988 aside from a goofy album by the unknown band Ned in the early seventies, picked up solely for the name.

Whoever mentioned the Rice Krispies crack is onto something -- by the time I got that player, I had been into music long enough to be utterly frustrated by skips and crackles and stuck grooves and the like. Bah. I want to hear the music, not the mistakes of the medium, thanks.

The cover art deal...*shrug*...eh. Again, music, not the artwork. As for expense, this is why I shop used.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm no perfectionist, but I got sick of virtually every other piece of vinyl I bought having pops and scratches, so I just about stopped buying vinyl around 5 years ago. I have developed various techniques for getting rid of 'grit in the grooves', but it's just something I don't want to spend time having to do. I guess it depends on your tolerance level for playability. Mine's low-ish - in other words pops and crackles piss me off. Also if something's REALLY good, I want it on the best available format. CD has no surface noise and is portable, it's a no-brainer.

Like Ally, I've had no problems with CDs, except in my portable player, which skips sometimes. My 'best' stereo is starting to skip very occasionally on CDs, but it's always OK after cleaning the CD. In other words the laser seems to be getting more sensitive to small amounts of dust.

The only CD I've bought which skipped horribly on each one of my 4 CD players was the Lemon Jelly album. I got a replacement and, guess what, the same thing happened. However the the reason for the skipping had NOTHING to do with the surface of the CD or the tracking. Each time I loaded it into the player I heard a tiny scraping sound as it spun the CD around. It turned out that the hole in the middle had a sort of slightly raised "lip" on the underside which was "catching" on something and physically moving the CD out of alignment. Once I filed it off it worked fine.

The reason for boring you all stupid with the details of this is that it might be something to check for if you've got a skipping CD.

Dr. C, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've also got very few damaged CDs, I take good care of them - what do you people do? Use them as frisbees/beermats/ashtrays, eh?

DG, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, still buy plenty of vinyl. Mostly used, though. I like to think of the $1 bin as my own personal Napster (basically free music) plus I get to listen over my stereo in my living room. I've found that you can tell from looking at a record in a store whether it will sound good, and most of the ones I come accross are in good shape. Back catalog stuff I never buy on CD when I can get it for $1 to $3. Simple economics. All the cover art and so forth is a major bonus.

Last year I considered buying a copy of _Surf's Up_ on vinyl used, but they were going for $20 because it was out of print. Now that it has been reissued on CD, I just picked up a perfect copy for $2. Interesesting how vinyl used to be sequenced; the title track of this record would have never been the last track on a CD if it had come out on that format originally. As it ends, it ends the album on the perfect note.

Mark, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still buy vinyl but only second-hand stuff cos I'm a cheapskate, I couldnt be bothered buying a new album on vinyl. Like Somg's "Dongs of sevotion" was on sale for 14 pound on vinyl, why bother when you'd get it for the same price on CD?. As for Ally giving out about her workmate throwing her copy of THB about the place, I thought you'd have 5 or 6 copies of that, no?

Michael Bourke, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

aLLY SeZ: See, I don't remember the original CD marketing (other than those ridiculous enormous boxes they came in - what the hell?), but you'd think after you screwed up your first CD, you'd be more careful.

I presume yr refering to the "Long Box" format, where the CD case would be at the bottom of a 12" x 5" cardboard sleeve. This AFAIK only happened in the USA (over here, "Long Boxes" were quite prized among CD import fetishist types. I didn't go for it that much, but I still have a couple of blue oyser cult boxes from when these LPs were unavailable over here in the attic somewhere. Anyway, the reason for this was that when the CD format started to take off, US recors stores concerted their 12" vinyl racks into CD racks by putting dividers down the middle. The long boxes were so you could browse more easily.

I don't buy vinyl anymore, mainly due to lack of space, and partly due to having a 2-year old wandering aruond, looking for stuff to put jammy fingerprints all over. Personally, I prefer CD sound. A lot of the complaints RE the sound of early CD reissues was down to cheap ass & stupid rekord kompanies using master tapes EQ'd for cutting to vinyl to do their CDs from. What converted me to CD was hearing a disc of Dvorak's "Hymnus". Before the choir came in, you could hear them drawing breath. I know it's a bit wanky, but it was really spooky, & sent shivers up me spine. Also, I got a CD of "Leige & Leif", and it just sounded so....good

x0x0x

Norman Fay, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Cds can skip on crapier cd players more than on higher quality ones. Also, as far as records having "more bass", it sounds like "more mudd" to me. I once heard and engineer say "I can make digital sound like analog but I can't go the other way. "

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I mainly only buy 12" singles on vinyl now, but they're a quick seller. I ummed and ahhd over whether to buy 'Pyramid Song' 12" on the day of release. I didn't. Made my mind up two days later, went to buy it - all sold out. Had to settle for the CD single. And I just hate CD singles. Three tracks on a CD?? Seems such a *waste* of plastic packaging.

I don't mind CD's. But I've always wondered why don't they package CD's in a vinyl album sized sleeve - with the CD positioned in a thin card tray or something? Best of both worlds.

Vinyl artwork is superior of course. I recently purchased Air's 'Playground Love' 12" single. Aside from the fact that I love the song and it only cost 99p, the real clincher was the artwork. I have one wall in my bedroom covered in choice album sleeves - cuts down on the decorating, I can tell you.

DavidM, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

How do you do that without damaging the wall or the sleeves ?

Patrick, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

New vinyl is ridiculously expensive. At least it is in these parts. I think the last new record I bought was Washing Machine and I remember that costing me 23 bucks. When I was in high school, I had this silly No CD policy and only allowed myself to buy music on vinyl or cassette. Over time I realised how limited my resources were and I became increasinly irritated by buying new records and discovering cracks in the sound and surface noise. I remember buying this very rare "mint" 7" once and being heartbroken when I came home to find the record skipped.

The only time I buy vinyl now is if it's used, new at a good price, or if it's something rare that I can't find in any other format.

JC, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think most rock music sounds *shit* on compact disc. Way too flat and tinny. Most of what I buy is electronic/sampled so I'm not too bothered. 'White Light/White Heat' or 'Totale's Turns' sound utterly horrendous on CD.

I've found many vinyl delights in charity shops and car boot sales recently... Stevie Wonder, Chic, Donna Summer, Astrud Gilberto. I do find vinyl more *engaging* than CDs, though the surface noise is still a big pain in the arse.

Johnathan, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I should have thought that Totales Turns would sound utterly horrendous on any medium going (but in an utterly fantastic sort of way)

I.M.Belong, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Being on CD destroys it's utter horrendous fantasticality. Um.

Johnathan, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Patrick: Erm, you'd have to damage the wall to hang up anything, ie nails or thumbtacks, but they're easy enough to cover up when you need to. As for damaging the sleeve - they make special frames specifically for putting album covers in. I buy mine at Urban Outfitters but they're probably overpriced there.

Ally, Thursday, 7 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It was actually my BF that bought Amnesiac on vinyl, but I was the one listening to it... (we have since been sent a free promo CD of said album. After blowing £20 or whatever on the special vinyl edition... sigh...)

It took me a long, long, time to disengage from vinyl and go to CD. Mainly because I didn't own a CD player until about 1997. I still haven't made up my mind which I prefer. Obviously, I like the "not having to get up to turn it over" and the programability of the CD, but I do admit that it misses something, both sonically and in terms of packaging.

It's probably something I learned at home- my dad was a sound engineer at a folk cafe, and utterly loathed *any* form of digital sound- be it CDs, digital effects, or even digital direct boxes. He was the one who pointed out the frequences that "you can't hear, but you can feel" and I think that's why I notice it.

I still own loads of CDs, in fact, at this point, I think I have more CDs than records (sigh, especially in the UK) but some things just sound ridiculous on CD - have you ever tried listening to the first JAMC album on CD? It's like watching a home movie on widescreen, it just misses the point.

I think that's also part of it- when and *how* recordings were made. I suspect a good engineer or masterer will compensate (maybe subconsciously) for frequency loss on music which is digitally generated, digitally recorded, and created for CD, and will compensate with certain tonal ranges that actually sound good on CD. While it's much harder to get music which was created and recorded on analogue to sound "right" on CD.

I also remember in music lectures at college, my soundgeek proff talking about how the recording techiniques have changed because of digital- not just the problems of recording totally digital instruments, but the problems of recording completely acoustic instruments to digital media. Especially with orchestras and things where you can't have absolute sound isolation. Multiple mic-ing becomes a problem because of differences of phase cancellation which are much worse in digital than analogue. (Ironically, the way this proff recommended recording was a return to sensitive single-mic-ing as used in the days before the invention of multi-tracking!)

So, yeah, maybe it takes a soundgeek to notice it, but there are differences in sound, and differences in recording technique.

And I just like the packaging of vinyl so much better. And skipping? Schmipping! Invariably, the people who complain most about skipping records are the ones who lose their inner sleeves and never have dust jackets.

Luckily, Paul has no less than FOUR turntables, and if he had his choice, would probably own nothing but vinyl, as it's "better for DJ- ing with", so I'm slowly being pulled back into my bad old habits.

However, it's annoying, knowing that vinyl is cheaper to produce, why the heck are records still more expensive? Or is this just cause of the ridiculous "ten inch, coloured vinyl" formatting type of them or what?

masonic boom, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As mentioned, I pretty much buy only vinyl. I'll only buy something on CD if it's not available on record, which thankfully is pretty rare. I like records because they are, indeed, easier to DJ with (though watch me lugging crates of records around and see if you agree), their cover art is better, and so on... Also, records are actually generally slightly cheaper. Go to Berwick Street in London and you can get albums for £8.99ish on vinyl or £10.99ish on CD.

But most of all, vinyl just feels nicer. Don't know what it is about it. I love the warmth of it, and the crackles when you play something you've played to death. I love the noise you get when the record ends and gets stuck in the last bit of the groove. I have a copy of Add N To (X)'s 'Metal Fingers In My Body' which I play almost every time I DJ, to the point that it skips in the same place every time. And if I hear that track without the crackles and the skips, it just doesn't feel right.

In fact, I'm such a flipping vinyl fan that even when I get sent free records on CD, if I like them, I'll go and buy the vinyl version...!

Paul Strange, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I believe it's much more expensive to manufacture vinyl. I was under the delusion that vinyl could be had more cheaply than CD's. And if you shop at Camelot (where a new CD will cost you 19 bucks) it can, but the discriminating consumer can usually buy a CD more cheaply.

An album that sounds fantastic on CD is the Mojave 3 ('out of time' I think). It sounds warm even in digital.

Steven James, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Correct steven. Warth comes from equalization, not just format. Warmth is a euphamism for "no definition" I find.

-- Mike Hanley, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, actually, wrong. Warmth has a lot to do with overtones and undertones.

Digital recording actually cuts off sounds above and below certain frequencies, the argument being that the human ear cannot hear them.

However, due to harmonic overtones and undertones, those frequencies which the ear cannot hear, can still combine harmonically with audible frequencies to produce a certain "warmth". A good engineer or a good mastering process can compensate for those lacks by adding EQ in certain frequency ranges, so good EQ will produce the illusion of warmth.

However, this does not account for modern records which were recorded digitally which were then transfered to vinyl- the missing frequencies were never recording in the first place, so mastering them to vinyl will do nothing, as they cannot be replaced.

Good god, I'm starting to sound like a Sound On Sound reader, help me, please.

masonic boom, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ok ok. The Mojave 3 cd gives me the illusion of warmth. Just like alcohol gives me the illusion of happiness.

Steven James, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Illusion of warmth? Excuse me but ..what?Is audio warmth somehow measurably "real"? Actually most analog systems don't have nearly the frquency range capabilities of digital systems. I think you are confusing "compression" with digital recourding.

-- Mike Hanley, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm a music lover who will buy a vinyl LP 99% of the time. "Warmth" the way I understand it is a tonal quality, and can be achieved through equilization when recording and mixing. It is true that early CDs were lacking in warmth (actually they just plain sucked), but this is hardly the LP's distinguishing feature. To me, the stand- out feature of vinyl is the the naturalness and realism of the presentation. The band (if it is a band you're listening to) sounds more engaging, tighter, the tune actually sounds catchier. CD does have a complete lack of surface noise in its favor, but this is a small point when the music isn't reproduced properly. Yes, CDs sound way better now then they used to, and I do listen to them a small percent of the time. And if you play dusty, scratched-up records on a cheap plastic turntable placed on a wobbly table with a worn-out needle, you're obviously not getting the most out of the format.

Sean, Friday, 8 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This is an illustration of the difference between analog and digital that I like. If you have an analog alarm clock, and you listen carefully before the alarm goes off, you can hear the clock 'building up' to the alarm. With a digital alarm clock, at 11.59.59 etc there is nothing, then at 12.00 exactly it rings (in digital terms 0 switches to 1 no gradation). Perhaps human consciousness reads the world in terms of cause and effect, and so analog seems more natural and warmer to us.

About record care. I understand that it is important to be able to listen to the song without it stopping in the middle, but I still can't completely identify with caring for objects that much. It almost seems like an *affront* to the content, to me, when the superficial manifestation of it is cared for so deeply. I feel suspicious when I see bookshelves filled with glacially clean books. On the other hand, the people I know who take good care of their records are generally very good themselves.

Maryann, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

One of the best advantages of digital is it offers high quality for low cost. TO get the sound from a CDr and 20$ cd walkman on vinyl you would need to spend a hell of allot more.

-- Mike Hanley, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, absolute BOLLOCKS!!! I dare you to come round and listen to the £30 Sainsburys AM/FM/Cassette/CD player that I have in my kitchen and tell me that affordable digital technology really sounds good. You get what you pay for, no matter what the format. It is the fault of the rarity of interest that turntables are so expensive, not because of the expense of the medium.

masonic boom, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Your kitchen stereo may sound bad but its likey due to the speakers, not the cd player.

-- Mike Hanley, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Back to the discussion at hand, I still buy vinyl, but my format of choice is CD. I once heard a piece on the radio about someone who will now only buy 8-tracks, because it's cheap, and you can get a zillion pieces of music for the price of one or two CDs/LPs. Now, used LPs offer that same cornucopia: you can wander into a used record store or pawn shop and come away with an armload of records for only a couple of bucks, and decide which ones you really like with a few quick listens, without worrying that you just blew a twenty on something on an impulse. When they're that cheap you don't have to worry about pops and scratches, which is my biggest problem with vinyl...I hear serious crackling even on supposedly new vinyl (bought the new Nick Cave 10" and was disgusted by the surface noise, straight from the factory). But for some things, vinyl can't be beat. I love getting comedy albums on vinyl, because there's just something wrong about a comedy CD, most of the time. I'm willing to drop 50 cents on some bit of cheese from my youth (say, an early Was Not Was song like "Dad I'm in Jail" or an Abba album) which would just look silly in my CD collection. And, of course, it's great when something just isn't available on CD. The packaging issue isn't so important to me, as I think that CD packaging is every bit as wonderful an art as the old vinyl, if you do it properly. It's the same as with the sound component: when you take an album/artwork meant for vinyl, and just shrink the artwork and bang the master into digital format, both suffer...thus the early CDs with awful sound and lousy artwork. But when you redo them for the CD format, then you can come up with something every bit as nice as the original analogue version, in my opinion.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ok, like finally (after what, 15 years?) CDs are beginning to be delivered like something the packagers think you might MIND about. This is because the format is UNDER THREAT. Digital is arguably better for sound which is point-form or constellated in ambient space (classical, jazz, techno) but CRAP for sound which is cloud-form (overdriven guitars i.e. rock), not intrinsically, but because Phillips hurried onto the market with a sound-pixelation size which was too clumsily overlarge, like the Ben Day dots in a Lichtenstein, or a hooligan's face on a fly-on-the-wall police doc (not that music isn't being made which suits this: it's just, it ain't guitar rock). Mike Hanley's various arguments abt definition and upper lower reach seem contradictory to me: yes, it's true that digital can reach higher and lower, and is better at angular or pointillist detail, but this is still often fucked at amp or speaker stage (or actually by your curtains and carpet, or lack of same), but the interplay of guitar amps in studio with the analogue groove's own capacity for resonance with the speakers in your room's vibration makes for a feedback warmth that the digital trandformation just cuts competely out (because sound is converted into light and back, with digital). Metal Machine Music doesn't work on CD. It does on record — I mean, on vinyl. I don't hate CDs, because now you often get little books with them, and I like books, but the granularity of the sound, for the music I like best, is like sand in the cracks. Here's who agrees with me: Neil Young and Steve Albini.

mark s, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, I still buy vinyl - often for the packaging and the tangibility of the purchase (obviously nostalgia at work here, but walking out of Rough Trade with a heavy 12" bag engenders a sense of urgency to get home and listen to the material which I don't get with CD. This could just be the fear that the longer I stay out in town, the more likely my precious LPs will be soaked/warped/crushed beneath the wheels of a bus). Sound quality-wise I often come to regret this LP-fetish - I have a good turntable, and plenty of my records sound sublime, but even 180gm pressings aren't always pristine and that first wince-inducing click (should I clean the thing?) or sssibilant (is my cart on the way out?) reminds me why I buy so many of those unpretty silver buggers.

Count me in with the camp who believe vinyl 'warmth' is an issue of EQ and mechanical resonance, rather than greater bandwidth (the vast majority of LPs are curtailed in the bass [summed to mono below 80Hz, rolled off pretty sharpish below 45Hz] and truncated in the high treble [not much above 15kHz], to spare cutter head problems). The greater sense of spaciousness that one can get with vinyl is another happy accident of euphonic distortion - phase anomalies in the upper-mid producing that 'front-to-back' imaging which (according to one of the more fanciful audiophile theories) 'fills in' what's lost twixt performance and recording (i.e. turning plain old stereo into something more 'real').

There are issues with 16/44.1 digital, of course - different dither algorithms (dither is a method of eliminating quantisation noise) produce different effects wrt: ambience and preservation of below-LSB information (some none too pleasant, allegedly), there are filter artefacts associated with the brick-wall cut-off at 22.05kHz, etc. But I'm fairly sure that yr average CD is a whole lot close to the master (whether it's 24/96 digital, DAT, 1/4" analogue, whatever) than yr average vinyl LP; doesn't mean that it necessarily *sounds* better, of course.

On the one occasion I made a CD-R of an LP, I couldn't tell the difference between the original and the copy - proof enough for me that if CD's distortions are subtractive, then they don't amount to much, and that vinyl's 'magic' is captured within the hard limits of CD.

I'm really dubious about claims of being able to hear the 'granular' nature of digital recording - it's not as if any discrete sample-steps survive the analogue reconstruction. And Neil Young can sod off.

Michael Jones, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Speaking of the CD/vinyl test, and speaking of Albini, the most recent Shellac album featured both formats in the box when you bought the LP. This was apparently Albini's proof that CDs were so inconsequential that they could afford to just GIVE THEM AWAY, thus meaning that vinyl was the superior format. What it actually proved to me was that CD is overpriced, and Albini's time would probably better be spent lowering the price of his own CDs. This is especially true after I did a side-by-side comparison of the two on my stereo system and couldn't really tell much difference between the sound quality of the two anyhow, except for the fact that they mastered the vinyl much more quietly, forcing me to turn up the volume to hear it properly, and thus allowing me to hear the static crackle much more clearly. Gee, thanks, Steve.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

At my local store the vinyl/CD combo was even cheaper than the CD. I should've caved and bought the vinyl, dammit, then I would own a REKKERD. AND be able to play it on my discman.

Josh, Monday, 11 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I try to. If it's a single disk. Recent example the new Mouse on Marse album. I was going to buy the new Air on vinyl, but alas the made it a double with only two songs per side. Needless to say I still buy a lot of second hand lp's.

Omar, Tuesday, 12 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Due to my lack of proper education and training in sound engineering and acoustics, I will refrain from any more of this discussion. I have seen similar talks lead to total flame wars. When it comes down to it, what matters most is what the listener likes best. As for me, I only owned cassettes until like 1996, so CDs and minidiscs were like gifts from God. But I respect everyone's opinion, and leave the tech bickering to the scientists. HOw ever, do you guys like the sound of mp3 s ?

-- Mike Hanley, Tuesday, 12 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't mind MP3s if there's a good encoder. I'm finding myself less and less impressed with the encoder that came with my Nomad Jukebox, as the beginning of records always start with a blast of static that is ear-shattering, and stutters throughout. Then again, this may have something to do with the DVD-ROM drive I'm encoding from. Anyone else run into this?

Sean Carruthers, Tuesday, 12 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What it actually proved to me was that CD is overpriced, and Albini's time would probably better be spent lowering the price of his own CDs. This is especially true after I did a side-by-side comparison of the two on my stereo system and couldn't really tell much difference between the sound quality of the two anyhow, except for the fact that they mastered the vinyl much more quietly, forcing me to turn up the volume to hear it properly, and thus allowing me to hear the static crackle much more clearly. Gee, thanks, Steve

Actually, Bob Weston, Shellac's bassist, addressed this when the LP/CD came out. He said you can't make any money with vinyl, but it still sells for less than CDs, whereas CDs cost nothing to make, and if they sold them to stores for only $5, the stores would still jack the price up.

As for me, I try to buy nothing but vinyl. CDs (a format I've been buying since 1986) mean nothing to me anymore since I got a burner. Fuck, I can make my own CD if I have to. The obscene amounts of relatively cheap vinyl reissues I've seen in the last two years (Miles Davis' entire CBS catalog of single LPs, Herbie Hancock's CBS LPs, Curtis Mayfield's first four LPs, Ornette Coleman's Atlantic/CBS/various others LPs, Bob Dylan records, Sugar Hill 12"ers and LPs, Parliament's catalog, James Brown's catalog, the Modern Lovers, the Stooges 3 LPs, both New York Dolls LPs, Wire's Harvest LPs, What's Going On, Pere Ubu's "classic" albums, Rhino/Scorpio Records reissues, the Get Back label, etc etc) make this an amazing time to buy vinyl.

Vic Funk, Tuesday, 12 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Our local store has gotten a bunch of those reissues in, as well as a whack of Captain Beefheart and Gil Scott-Heron releases. Almost enough to make me start buying vinyl again, too...but not quite. Probably better to get a better turntable first.

Sean Carruthers, Tuesday, 12 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think the quality of vinyl pressings has deteriorated horribly. I have certain albums from the 70's that I've played hundreds of times but still sound remarkably clean, whereas brand new vinyl often comes with clicks/pops/crackles (and wears more quickly). This may not be an issue with more expensive collector editions.

David, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Steady Mike said -

no, I can't go on.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 13 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
Sometimes it's hard to resist.

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 22 June 2003 20:00 (twenty-two years ago)

New dancehall tunes only come out on 45 so it's a must.

cybele (cybele), Sunday, 22 June 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i only buy vinyl if that's the only to get what i want, like, for example, the recent Sun City Girls reissue of two early cassettes on Eclipse. otherwise, compact disc because a lot of my listening is going to and from work.

jack cole (jackcole), Sunday, 22 June 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

this thread is a timely find for me. i've only recently just purchased my first turntable - i saved up for a while and purchased one brand new technics 1210 (which i had decided upon after thorough research and friends suggestions).

i decided to buy a turntable because there are so many great current releases being released exclusively on the vinyl format it seems, especially as others have mentioned in the experimental/electronic/etc genres. i constantly read the boomkat new release updates and also forced exposure and i felt i was missing out on some great stuff. since my turntable purchase i've been trying to form some semblance of a record collection and have some pretty nice stuff like new city-centre-offices, kompakt, and ai records releases. my father took note of my turntable purchase and decided to go through the attic back home and ended up pulling out a few out of his old LP collection - al green "call me", a beach boys concert album, some old beatles LPs and also a few that are vietnamese? bootlegs (i think) of crosby, stills, nash and young and the rolling stones.

it's been quite a bit of fun and has kept me off the mp3 binaries newsgroups/soulseek for a while.

jason m. (jason m), Sunday, 22 June 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

If I find it cheap (ie raiding the jazz shelves at Half Price Books), or if it's something I really like (enough to have two copies - one on CD), yeah.

But I don't have a tape deck, nor a good way to record vinyl to CD, so I have to have a CD first.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 22 June 2003 23:38 (twenty-two years ago)

i will now only by vinyl that is utterly unavailable on CD, and sell the vinyl as soon as it is.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 23 June 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Reverse that for me.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 23 June 2003 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)

ditto

di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 23 June 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

at least i know there'll people i can sell my 2ndhand vinly too

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 23 June 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

(vinly = like dobly)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 23 June 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Do y'all vinyl-first or vinyl-only folks drive much?

That's my main motivation - I end up listening to music more in my truck than anywhere. I'm also a lot better about listening to music as an album that way. When I've got it in a CD player with remote or iTunes, I'll listen to half or 2/3 and then move on to another.

ADD = fun.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 23 June 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I still buy vinyl. Mostly when it's cheap (today I got a few Rolling Stones LPs for $4 apiece; Let It Bleed and Her Satanic Majesties) and when it's unavailable on other formats (Pearls Before Swine's first album, lots of hardcore records).

I also buy tons of 7" singles (mostly indie/noise/hardcore).

As for casettes, I buy 'em if they're cheap and if they're the only format available (lots of noise stuff is cassette only.)

Ian Johnson, Monday, 23 June 2003 04:13 (twenty-two years ago)

And to address the question of driving music, if I really like a record and want to listen to it in the car, I'll tape it. Usually I take a big stack of 7"s and maybe an LP or two and just tape 'em all. I've got lots of compilation tapes in the car like this.

Ian Johnson, Monday, 23 June 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i still buy vinyl. usually indie 7"s if it's nothing i can get on CD, or hip hop 12"s (generally for the instrumentals on the flipside), and sometimes if i find some good classic rock LPs.

Al (sitcom), Monday, 23 June 2003 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)

i buy lots of vinly (yes jim). especially reissues and 7". i'm crazy for 7". and of course a lot of cheap second hand stuff.

joan vich (joan vich), Monday, 23 June 2003 08:16 (twenty-two years ago)

speaking of which, i took about 130 elpees and 7" singles in good nick to the record store.. and they were only going to give me $50 for them :( scumbags.. this is why i don't buy cheap vinyl anymore. it ends up having to be thrown away to make space.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 23 June 2003 08:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I have a vinyl collection (only dance/singles with the occasional album)
I have a cd collection (only compilations with an occasional album)

Vinyl is lots cheaper and if you know your way around you can buy a record for a couple of euros and sell it for 100 euros or more on ebay.

The truth is (and lucky for me) that not many people know what the value is of a good piece of vinyl.

Jan Geerinck (jahsonic), Monday, 23 June 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I still buy wax -- both new and used (i routinely come across new LPs that are $8.99 as compared to their $11.99 digital counterparts and used stuff is just nice to sift through).

CD repackages can be sweet, though, with rarities and oddities and the like, though, still not as sweet the sweetest of LP packages.

In the end, anybody who swears OFF a format, is certainly missing something.

Side question: does anybody else listen to music broadcast over the A.M. waves?

christoff (christoff), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I am about half way to having 1,000 records in my crib.

I buy it more often than CD's. Quality used vinyl is so cheap if you search hard enough. Crate-digging is fun too. I like 12"s and used LP's and an occassional 45. Despite its bulk, I like vinyl more than a CD. There's no question it is warmer. Old funk 45's are very loud and Sly & the Family Stone sounds better off wax anyday. I have great rare soundtracks that probably will never come out in the CD format. Eventually, I plan to rip a good bit of my record collection to CD/MP3 and polish it up using Cakewalk or something. One day, I know I can sell items in my collection for 100 times what I paid for them.

I also would like to try DJing in the near future. I don't own two Technics 1200's and mixer though. I still feel my collection isn't quite deep enough to DJ solo. I wish I never bought most of the garbage but I have about four or five solid crates worth of quality records. I think I need more "danceable" music.

I listen to A.M. when I'm bored in the car. I like Latin A.M. radio stations sometimes.

Cub, Tuesday, 24 June 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I hit a used-bookstore sidewalk sale today. All albums $1.99

Rolling Stones - Between the Buttons
Rolling Stones - Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out
Blondie - Best of
New Order - Movement
Neil Young - After The Gold Rush
Public Image Ltd. - The Flowers of Romance
CCR - Willy and the Poor Boys
B-52s - S/T
REM - Murmur
REM - Document
Jefferson Airplane - Surrealistic Pillow

Some stuff I'd never pay full-CD price for (Surrealistic Pillow, Blondie's Best of), some that's just a sweet bargain for $2.

I was hoping for an Exile on Main St. LP, though.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

i have one of those, it's a little scratchy though

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 00:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sure these aren't in the best of shape - the B-52s especially looks a bit rough, but it was the best of the four copies there.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

AM Radio: YES oh YES. Vancouver has two oldies stations, one at 600(more sinatra) and the other at 650(more bacharach). when one goes to an ad break, or hits a dud song, i just run down the dial a spot, and all is well.

the other day, for 1.99 apiece, I picked up:

Glen Campbell - By The Time I get To Phoenix
Glen Campbell - Gentle On My Mind
Carpenters - Close To You
Martha and the Muffins - This Is the Ice Age
Bruce Cockburn - Humans
Bruce Cockburn - World Of Wonders
Bruce Cockburn - Trouble with Normal
Gordon Lightfoot - Summertime dream
Alan parsons Project - Eye In the Sky
The Pursuit of Happiness - Love Junk
Dire Straits - s/t
Gowan - Strange Animal

I passed on a Boney M and a Nik Kershaw, but may go back for them soon.

Cheap vinyl is the best way to build a collection, bar none.

derrick (derrick), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I buy quite a few 7"s, but only the odd LP on vinyl.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

YES!! A.M. is the real dealio -- high end audio is great, but once again, if it's all you'll listen too, you're certainly missing out on something (besides Ovaltine adverts).

christoff (christoff), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

More evidence of a vinyl revival:

http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2127350,00.html

moley, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 01:55 (eighteen years ago)

i have been buying a lot of dance 12"s of late. i've cut way back on CDs, too. i have only ever bought one mp3.

haitch, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:11 (eighteen years ago)

I only buy Serato vinyl now!

Spencer Chow, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:16 (eighteen years ago)

That article is missing a key figure: 13% x What = What?

Spencer Chow, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:17 (eighteen years ago)

I'm all for vinyl when it comes to 12"s,7"s,10"s, oop stuff, stuff that hasn't been properly remastered yet

But I see no point in buying anything else on vinyl now that I no longer get the employee discount (never had to pay more than $4 for single LPs, and $4 would be for a VF original copy of Zoso or something)

Buying (full-length) new releases on vinyl when you can get it on CD is just insane to me, unless there's bonus tracks or you're the dude who runs Elektra who has the 15,000 turntable

babedad, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)

$15,000

babedad, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)

CDs need some more lovin

babedad, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)

I think I stopped buying CDs roughly around the time that I sold my car. Nowadays all of the music I purchase is on vinyl, new or used. If I need a digital copy for some reason, like making a mix for someone, I download it.

Z S, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:40 (eighteen years ago)

I think free album downloads plus limited edition vinyl is the way I'm going with my releases from now on.

moley, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 02:45 (eighteen years ago)

I think I stopped buying CDs roughly around the time that I sold my car I bought a turntable. Nowadays all of the music I purchase is on vinyl, new or used. If I need a digital copy for some reason, like making a mix for someone, I download it.

-- Z S, Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:40 AM

Labels that do free dig downloads for vinyl buyers are golden.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:21 (eighteen years ago)

er

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:21 (eighteen years ago)

I got a single by my favorite underground dude in the mail today. Sadly, I have no way to listen to it/rip it to digital.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)

It's also great when there's some sort of vinyl-only bonus, like the recent Deerhunter and Of Montreal releases, with the free EPs tacked on to Side 4.

Z S, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:27 (eighteen years ago)

I bought vinyl today! Lots of it!

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:50 (eighteen years ago)

I totally overspent this month. Bye bye new glasses.

:(

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)

tape 'em up, nerdlinger! as long as you got ears, you are golden!

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

I love to dig and to get my hands on all kinds of records. And I buy vinyl to DJ with, and couldn't see doing it any other way (despite understanding the many advantages of going digital).

I also often find that vinyl-oriented DJs play more interesting stuff than digital DJs do. It's just so easy nowadays for anyone to grab flavor-of-the-month MP3s or to download all of those "sure shot" tracks that everybody knows.

Romeo Jones, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 04:02 (eighteen years ago)

I still buy vinyl. All the time. Never buy CDs; well, rarely anyway. Don't really download (that will change once I get new computarr though, probably.)

ian, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 04:41 (eighteen years ago)

i only really listen to metal and reissues of 60's stuff on cd. for the most part.

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)

and i listen to tapes. i bought a bunch of no-name 80's crystal healing/astral projection/cosmic vortex/subliminal/flute harp synth tapes today.

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 05:01 (eighteen years ago)

Used tapes are the ultimate. I hardly ever find anything great, but when I do they are super-mega cheap. I'm talkin Nitzer Ebb and Eazy-E for fitty cents. I pray that one day my wall-of-tapes dream will be realized.

Romeo Jones, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 05:22 (eighteen years ago)

I'm dubious about this vinyl revival - there's nowhere in Exeter, for instance, to buy vinyl; a handful of singles and so on in HMV but seemingly nothing in Virgin or anywhere else.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)

i never stopped buying vinyl, but now for the first time in probably 10 years i'm buying more vinyl than cds again

electricsound, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 08:13 (eighteen years ago)

I mostly buy CDs over LPs but I still buy a lot of 7"s. Mostly old punk singles though, not much new stuff.

Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 08:36 (eighteen years ago)

i bought a whole load this week, so exciting

i started buying vinyl again 2 years ago, didn't think i was going to but lots of these underground type bands have vinyl only releases. same with tapes, i'm no sentimental tape dude but cant miss out on some of these things. i;ll sell them on ebay when i get tired of them, but i doubt i ever will. i will never leave this tape/vinyl/cd-r swamp i'm stuck in. i loves it

rizzx, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 09:09 (eighteen years ago)

I think I bought around 200-250 CDs tops, between the early and mid-90's. Since then it's blank ones only- it truly was a parenthesis, whereas I'm still adding to a vinyl collection started in the late 70's. Hundreds of tapes rotting away in the attic too, hoping to convert some to digital format one of these days.

blunt, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 09:21 (eighteen years ago)

It seems to me that the big argument for CD over vinyl was it's portability. These days CDs aren't even the most portable format, it's MP3, so they lose even that USP. I only ever buy vinyl now - I'll download an album to see if it's any good, if it's not I'll delete it, if it is, I'll hunt down the vinyl. Vinyl sounds better to my ears, and looks loads cooler - CDs are no use to me.

The Wayward Johnny B, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)

I'm dubious about this vinyl revival - there's nowhere in Exeter, for instance, to buy vinyl; a handful of singles and so on in HMV but seemingly nothing in Virgin or anywhere else.

in virgin (bristol) the 7" racks are stuffed with piles of these so called limited offerings, however i rarely see anyone buying them.

mark e, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 10:06 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, "up 13%" sounds good but could just mean 113 rather than 100.

i've just spent £26 on vinyl (8 tracks total, about 50 minutes) that are available as mp3s from snocap (ie US only) for $11. he did have decent digital distibution in the uk but seems to have abandoned it so i'm back to buying vinyl at 4 times the price and digitising them myself.

koogs, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:56 (eighteen years ago)

the new long blondes remix single (limited to a thousand or so) is available on vinyl only. this is extremely annoying for people who have thrown away most of their vinyl and all of their vinyl-playing equipment. ie me.

pisces, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:04 (eighteen years ago)

i just ordered a bunch of vinyl singles over the weekend, the first vinyl i've bought in ages. i can't wait! there are some songs that i just know are gonna be hard to find on 12" in a year or two so i needed to act now.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:06 (eighteen years ago)

Pisces: Just get one of these

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:15 (eighteen years ago)

I listen to almost my music purely digitally now. Buying CDs seems like throwing good money into a dying format.

But I still feel funny paying for downloads, esp. when they are DRMed in some restrictive format that could cause problems down the line.

I don't like nicking it all though, so my general policy is to belatedly buy vinyl versions of music I've already downloaded and liked, even though I don't have a turntable at the moment.

Problem is availability. Just bought a lovely heavyweight 7" of Lily Allen's Littlest Things, though.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:21 (eighteen years ago)

(vinyl may still ultimately be dying, but at least it's a nice thing to own, unlike a crappy little jewel case and flimsy insert).

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:23 (eighteen years ago)

Only buy vinyl - haven't bought a new CD in about 2 years; will download stuff, but if I like it, I'll get it on Vinyl - as for driving, only have radio in the car.

sonofstan, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)

> i just ordered a bunch of vinyl singles over the weekend

couldn't you just listen to them "in your mind"? 8)

my audio cds, still my prefered format, end up being the backups for my mp3s (oggs / flacs)

koogs, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)

"They maybe will buy the download to listen to, but they get the vinyl to own. It's looked at like artwork."

yes

(vinyl may still ultimately be dying, but at least it's a nice thing to own, unlike a crappy little jewel case and flimsy insert).

yes

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:47 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not sure how buying CDs is "throwing good money into a dying format"? If you have a CD player and take care of it, it's not as if you're going to be unable to play CDs suddenly. And people selling their phsyical CDs is great as far as I'm concerned - it means cheaper, more available stuff in the second-hand market for me.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)

Still not a vinyl person (see post way upthread) -- in ways the sheer ephemeralness of mp3/ripped files is exactly where I want to be in terms of 'possession' now, embracing that more fully is a means of letting go. I'm still transitioning fully (and get promo CDs in the mail all the time) but as I've muttered elsewhere buying music in general comes down to limited/special CD issues, total bargain bin scrounges and the occasional (very occasional) 'must have' item. Vinyl just doesn't enter into it for me -- the space is not here, neither is the ease of listening to something.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

I think there is definitely something in the idea that, as more immaterial formats take hold, if you get a material format, the more material it is the better.

Obviously, something like this is the logical endpoint of that!

Anyway, I struggled with why I still bought vinyl - was it just affectation on my part - but now I'm totally comfortable with it. Plus I just got a lovely new turntable, and it really does sound good.

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:14 (eighteen years ago)

My external hard drive just packed in totally, so I lost ALL my mp3s. Interestingly, I wasn't that bothered. I think this emphasised to me how much my records do mean to me, but also made me more comfortable with all the file-sharing I'd been doing. I hadn't nicked this stuff, I'd just been listening to it!

I must be getting something more than use-value from the records then, I suppose. Although the physical act of putting a record on is just more fun than firing up itunes or sticking a CD on.

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)

Music=wonderful

Fetishising any particular music deliver system (ears excepted) = dud

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:25 (eighteen years ago)

My external hard drive just packed in totally, so I lost ALL my mp3s.

Right now all my mp3s are burned to CDR/DVDR as backups -- and the amount of physical space that takes up is very compact. So if I ever had a full failure I'd just shrug and re-up.

Fetishising any particular music deliver system (ears excepted) = dud

Wise man...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)

Although I do admit it's very difficult (not impossible!) to roll a decent j on an ipod shuffle.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)

"it means cheaper, more available stuff in the second-hand market for me."

totally. i only really buy CDs at yard sales now. CDs and DVDs/vhs are treated as one step from the garbage can for a lot of people at yard sales these days. which is why it's hard for me to pay more than a dollar for a cd. and yet, i just paid 17 dollars for the new kemialliset ystavat album on vinyl yesterday. go figure.

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:54 (eighteen years ago)

"Fetishising any particular music deliver system (ears excepted) = dud"

if fetishising = enjoy a whole lot cuz they are so cool and sound so good and are so much fun to look at and listen to and collect, then call me a fetishist!

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

As far as I can recall the only things I've bought on vinyl in the last 2-3 years have been a couple of Beefheart albums (purchased new, and which I only really got because the mastering of the available CD's is so abominable) and a few odd bits that simply weren't available on CD (of which at least half have subsequently become available - Kangaroo? and Soldier Talk by Red Crayola; The Tenement Year by Pere Ubu; that Pseudo Existors album that Colonel Poo are currently talking about on another thread).

Stewart Osborne, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

Buying CDs seems like throwing good money into a dying format

This makes no sense to me, which is why I'm glad that this was said later:

I'm not sure how buying CDs is "throwing good money into a dying format"? If you have a CD player and take care of it, it's not as if you're going to be unable to play CDs suddenly.

Just like vinyl and turntables, so long as I have a CD player, any CD I buy now I'll be able to enjoy for decades. CDs are still readily available and will be for a number of years, even if they do become extinct sooner than we think, so how is my buying a CD a waste of money? Even despite the minor vinyl resurgence, vinyl is still, by and large, much more of a dying format than CDs -- yea, DJs still use 'em along with a few collectors like us -- but not many of us here would claim that buying vinyl is a waste of good money as we would about CDs. Why? Is it just the artwork? I'd take the minimal artwork you get from a CD over the, well, nothing that comes with an mp3.

Also, I only access the internet at work, so I rarely download anything. CDs (and vinyl) remain the medium of choice for someone like me who listens to most of my purchased stuff at home. (At work it's mostly internet radio or other streaming music).

So yea, for any new releases or (obviously) stuff that isn't on vinyl, I still buy mostly CDs, and I buy vinyl exclusively for used stuff.

if fetishising = enjoy a whole lot cuz they are so cool and sound so good and are so much fun to look at and listen to and collect, then call me a fetishist!

otm.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)

Even despite the minor vinyl resurgence, vinyl is still, by and large, much more of a dying format than CDs -- yea, DJs still use 'em along with a few collectors like us -- but not many of us here would claim that buying vinyl is a waste of good money as we would about CDs. Why? Is it just the artwork?

if humans went extinct and aliens came to earth and found a bunch of records, they could probably work out how to get a sound out of them - no "decoding" mechanism is required - this is why they are not a "dying" format in the same sense that every digital format will always be

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

I guess I meant "dying" in terms of how many people are using/buying the medium, rather than in terms of having the available equipment to use it. But I see your point -- but I'm not sure people who still lovingly buy vinyl but completely shun CDs are thinking of it in the terms you just stated. I could be wrong though.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

if humans went extinct and aliens came to earth and found a bunch of records

...they would probably think "A fully baked organically-derived snack product with a paper part and a hole for one's eating finger!" and devour them.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

If they have fingers.

C. Grisso/McCain, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

;>)

C. Grisso/McCain, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

Pseudopods.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

i'm just glad they sent a gold record of chuck berry up in that space capsule instead of a CD; it's a bigger snack, too

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

I once derailed another thread with similar wild sci-fi musings.

While playability in the year 5000 isn't going to be the primary factor among collectors, it is a real issue for libraries. To digitise or not and to what format and whether to continue aquiring physical formats &c.

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

MP3 is not going to last 10 years anyway, so either get a huge hard drive and buy wavs, or keep to vinyl or CD, or just relax a little and embrace the ephemerality.

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

put your loving pseudopods around me

Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

The library side of format obsolesence is BIG in my mind right now.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

Yea that's a really interesting issue. I gather from the other threads that you work in a media library, what's your take on it?

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)

MP3 is not going to last 10 years anyway

Most of what I have mp3wise either was only readily available in that format or consisted of stuff I ripped and haven't touched again -- which'll probably be a huge advantage as the price of memory collapses/hard drive sizes grow/etc. when it comes to storage of uncompressed files.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

i've been buying a ton more new vinyl lately, esp. cuz subpop and 4ad and t&g and things have been including free downloads w/vinyl purchases.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, you'll still be able to play your CDs for ages to come, but my point is I can't imagine wanting to. Nowadays, CDs seem to have all the disadvantages of a physical format (inconvenience, inflexibility, bulk) but don't have the one advantage that vinyl has (being a nice object to own, with decent-sized artwork).

The only reason I can see for carrying on buying CDs over downloads, if you're an audiophile with a really nice set up, is the sound quality issue, but as bandwidths and storage spaces increase, how long that will remain an issue I don't know.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:22 (eighteen years ago)

you have to be an "audiophile" now to like good sound? honestly, CDs w/a decent player and stereo sound way better than on PC...

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if the recent 'resurgence' of vinyl sales, is down to people downloading tracks, and then that thing of "oh i'll buy the ones i really like" now translates to "i'll buy the object", ie the 7" single to be owned as artifact, probably to never be played

i dont think thats a bad thing though, necessarily, though it wanders into heritigization territory

Filey Camp, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

you have to be an "audiophile" now to like good sound?

Well, the sound you get from a computer with a half-decent soundcard, hooked up to something like some Harmon Kardon Soundsticks (or just streamed to your regular stereo), with 192VBR or better MP3s (my set-up) is going to satisfy 90% of the population. Maybe it shouldn't, but it does.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if the recent 'resurgence' of vinyl sales, is down to people downloading tracks, and then that thing of "oh i'll buy the ones i really like" now translates to "i'll buy the object", ie the 7" single to be owned as artifact, probably to never be played

Well that's kind of what I do, but I think I'm unusual, and I do plan to actually play my vinyl when I get around to having a cosy sitting room with a nice turntable set-up.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

"if you're an audiophile with a really nice set up", above should read "unless you're...".

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

No, wait, it shouldn't! I am misreading my own posts. As you were.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

honestly, CDs w/a decent player and stereo sound way better than on PC...

True enough, but MP3s aren't tethered to the PC anymore - or even to the iPod/iRiver/whatever. There are near-audiophile-grade devices out there like the Transporter and the Squeezebox which wirelessly stream from yr hard-drive and plug into yr stereo. You could always stream FLAC or WAV if you wanted to.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)

True enough, but MP3s aren't tethered to the PC anymore - or even to the iPod/iRiver/whatever. There are near-audiophile-grade devices out there like the Transporter and the Squeezebox which wirelessly stream from yr hard-drive and plug into yr stereo.

Yeah, you'll still be able to play your CDs for ages to come, but my point is I can't imagine wanting to. Nowadays, CDs seem to have all the disadvantages of a physical format (inconvenience, inflexibility, bulk)

At least for me, it would be a hell of a lot more inconvenient to achieve a set-up for listening to mp3s that can equal what I already have (and have had, for years) for listening to CDs/vinyl.

Really, it isn't too difficult for me to put a CD on to a bookshelf with all the others once I buy it, nor is it to stick it into my stereo -- apart from listening to music during a commute, for which iPods/mp3 players are obviously more convenient, I don't understand why CDs are claimed to be so inconvenient.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Excepted, of course, are those who have thousands of CDs that require more than a bookshelf to store. mp3s would definitely be more convenient in this sense. I have a good amount of CDs, but not so many that they're causing storage problems.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)

There are near-audiophile-grade devices out there like the Transporter and the Squeezebox which wirelessly stream from yr hard-drive and plug into yr stereo. You could always stream FLAC or WAV if you wanted to.

-- Michael Jones, Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:43 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah i dunno...that doesn't really sound easier than buying a CD, putting it in a CD player on the stereo I already have and listening to it.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)

yea, it kind of takes out the convenience argument, at least to a certain extent

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)

they can be inconvenient if you have a transitory or insecure lifestyle. we do seem to be attached to objects, just look at all the personal storage spaces for people who dont have room for them!

Filey Camp, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)

I just listen to almost all my music through iTunes these days and have become used to flicking around and hearing what I want to hear instantly, maybe making playlists and smart playlists as I go. Streaming it to my stereo, now I've bought the Airtunes thing, is a piece of piss. I can't do any of that with a CD.

If I want to go back to an old "put an album on and listen to it in my chair" thing, I'd rather go the whole hog of putting an LP on, hearing the needle hit the groove, watch it spinning, all that malarkey.

CDs are some worthless halfway house to me, so I don't buy them unless there's no alternative now.

People in the UK tend to have to live in small spaces and even a modestly sized collection takes up a lot of room.

Alba, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

I just listen to almost all my music through iTunes these days and have become used to flicking around and hearing what I want to hear instantly, maybe making playlists and smart playlists as I go. Streaming it to my stereo, now I've bought the Airtunes thing, is a piece of piss. I can't do any of that with a CD.

This is a really good point, and yea I can see how this beats CDs for sure. My brother, who for years collected CDs and did the album-only thing, did a similar thing as you and it really did wonders for refreshing his perspective of his collection. He doesn't really buy CDs anymore.

Occasionally, I stare at my collection and can have a hard time picking out a whole album that I really want to hear -- even a few hundred CDs and LPs can seem stale every once and a while. But picking out individual stuff for playlists or smart playlists, which you can only do of course with mp3s, makes you hear individual songs or parts of albums in all kinds of different contexts, and can really refresh how you hear music that 1.) might have otherwise grown a little stale or 2.) has gone neglected for some reason or another.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

i don't actually keep the stuff that i download on the internet. i just listen to it and then i delete it. i have no music stored on my computer. i kinda treat the internet like a radio. which is why i LOVE stuff like last fm and actual internet radio stations. and i have my computer hooked up to my stereo, so everything sounds pretty good. unless it's a crappy quality youtube video or something.

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

In Chicago, the used cd stores are disappearing, while well-managed record stores appear to be thriving. I'd assume this is a result of people buying fewer cds and/or making fewer blind purchases due to downloading, and therefore not having so many unwanted cds to sell.

My record:cd purchase ratio is about 10:1.

Mike Dixn, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

Just as I was posting that, I realized that the city recently passed some pretty strict regulations on the 2nd hand cd market, which made it much harder for a person to sell stolen discs. So maybe that's a factor as well.

Mike Dixn, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

MP3's will be readable for decades to come. Since the home computer era began, I don't think there's a single significant format that's been abandonded completely - old document, spreadsheet, picture, etc formats can still at least be read. Every single device made to handle digital formats handles at least MP3.

I'm one of those guys who gave up on vinyl when CDs first emerged. Even today I want a CD copy of something because I want to be able to rip it myself. I hate 128 bit MP3s but can't hear much difference after 192 LAME VBR's (too many concerts). I have an entire room full of CD shelves and am a devout album-listener who is slowly appreciating playlisting.

But I do forsee a day when I've ripped everything and boxed them up (won't sell 'em!).

Mr. Odd, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

I still listen to everything.

Currently, I have maybe 80 CDs-worth of MP3s that fall into three categories:

1. For preview only (and are eventually pitched).
2. Are out-of-print and only available in MP3 -- ebay premiums are rarely endured.
3. Are compilations of artists that i've genuinely pirated (but would still prefer to one-day buy outright).

--Storing music on a hard drive is only a weigh-station in that it stays there long enough to find enough companions to fill the 700MB of a CD-R.

While 7-hour-long artist anthologies or "mixes" are an adventure all on their own, i have a limited amount of tolerance for the hobbled fidelity of even the highest-grade MP3s. A solid four or five hours is about all i can handle listening before i either have to turn the volume down, or, switch to an LP, a CD, or even a cassette. The sonic fatigue of MP3s can be likened to the old days of AM radio (as mentioned WAY upthread) in that the more you lower the volume, the longer you can listen before it starts making your head hurt. My everyday rig has a decent 100W amp, middle-of-the-road bookshelf speakers, and a nice CD player (i.e. non-DVD) that also plays MP3s, -- so i'm giving the medium as good a shot at sounding good as anyone (save, your higher-end earbud/headphone users). My "audiophile" rig has the old-school amp and proper floor speakers, etc -- and is where i enjoy full albums.

...And what's this about music getting stale? Nothing i listen to is ever stale since the variety of thoughtfully-crafted assemblages are just a single disc away. When technology gets around to making a portable player that holds something in the 500GB-range, maybe then they'll get my interest.

christoff, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

But yes, I still buy vinyl - probably half the time.

christoff, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

I'm one of those guys who gave up on vinyl when CDs first emerged.

one of those millions and millions of guys lol. including myself(i was too young to collect in the lp era anyway so the charm might be lost on me). ned otm, i'm letting go of cds as a format but vinyl seems like 3 steps back in terms of accessibility, portability, space issues etc. I buy vinyl maybe once or twice a year but hardly listen to it so what's the point.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 23:58 (eighteen years ago)

I listen to hours of internet radio a day (mainly Pandora and Last FM)and buy only 2 or 3 CDs or pieces of vinyl a year, always albums, which I choose very carefully and listen to a lot. We have a record rack in our lving room and it's always the first thing people go to when the come to our house. We still do the whole album sleeve on the floor thing.

moley, Thursday, 19 July 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)

i like music.

latebloomer, Thursday, 19 July 2007 01:19 (eighteen years ago)

<i>It seems to me that the big argument for CD over vinyl was it's portability.</i>
equally big argument would be durability.
you could argue sound quality, too, although that gets a bit tricky (especially these days with fuckers like robin guthrie remixing their old tunes)

mp3s are ok but what is wrong with you people who don't like buying music/going to record stores???

babedad, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:11 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, just browsing for music in a store is so much fun.

i can't believe that people actually pay for digital music files. getting off topic here, though

babedad, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:12 (eighteen years ago)

i'd pay for pristine files if companies were willing to, i dunno, factor out the cost of molding plastic/vinyl and distributing units throughout the country via trucks and planes. fuckers just don't quit huh?

tremendoid, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:25 (eighteen years ago)

Well, how can they, really? The whole economic system is screwed. I'd imagine it's really just a bunch of people trying to hold onto their jobs as much for identity reasons as to maintain their level of income.

Tim Ellison, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:39 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, just browsing for music in a store is so much fun.

It used to be, back when I had a large want-list and sometimes bought things blind based on the cover or a vague recollection of being told about a band. But now, the thrill of the hunt is dead for me, just gimme the CD.

Mr. Odd, Friday, 20 July 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)

xpost yah but see I, Mr. Customer, just explained to the world what would make me buy into THEIR future in one sentence. Instead of listening to me and others like me(and others waaaay more tolerant than me of their hijinx with equally simple ideas) 'they' got whole divisions dicking around trying to lock down a Zune somewhere. I refuse to believe they're more clueless than me when it comes to selling/branding music.

tremendoid, Friday, 20 July 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)

this is a tangent, and one that's been done, sorry. i only listen to the beatles on vinyl if i can help it, forgot to say

tremendoid, Friday, 20 July 2007 03:11 (eighteen years ago)

I used to hang my record sleeves all over my wall as artwork

I am toying with the idea of revising this. Like a big mural.

Trayce, Friday, 20 July 2007 06:10 (eighteen years ago)

Big music murals are good - as long as they don't have Jimi or Jim Kurt in them.

moley, Friday, 20 July 2007 06:14 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

i do still buy vinyl and id buy a lot more if it was a bit cheaper but half the time now its pricier than cds, and postage for vinyl is more too. i dont mind paying a bit more sometimes but now its become like a 'you want sonic quality? you have to pay more' luxury rather than just an option about format.

titchyschneiderMk2, Saturday, 13 October 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

i almost never buy new albums on vinyl, cds are smaller and yeah like you say often cheaper.
i still buy tons of 2nd hand vinyl, though.

babedad, Saturday, 13 October 2007 23:47 (eighteen years ago)

xp

now its become like a 'you want sonic quality? you have to pay more' luxury rather than just an option about format.

yup. it's bloody ridiculous in the US - i guess it's just the failing dollar, the new 'prestige tax' for vinyl (most of which is probably mastered from digital sources anyway), high shipping, etc. but i regularly see new LPs from $30-45 for a single LP. fuck that.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Saturday, 13 October 2007 23:49 (eighteen years ago)

i regularly see new LPs from $30-45 for a single LP. fuck that.

http://img01.picoodle.com/img/img01/9/10/13/f_preachm_094ca26.png

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 13 October 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)

i was in newbury comics today and i could have sworn i overheard some girl saying "ooh look, it's those disc albums" in reference to the vinyl bin

ciderpress, Sunday, 14 October 2007 01:52 (eighteen years ago)

my girlfriend does lots of work in inner city schools and was talking to some toddlers about what they want to do/be when they grow up and one said he wants to be a DJ and play those big black DJ CDs.

And he wasn't talking about albini.

dan selzer, Sunday, 14 October 2007 04:55 (eighteen years ago)

xpost - that 'prestige tax' is turning it into some sort of elitist format (which is surely going to make it pricier).

as far as it being obsolete, in all those articles about indie 7"s selling again, there were kids saying they dont even own turntables but just liked how 7"s looked.

titchyschneiderMk2, Sunday, 14 October 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

I don't like to buy vinyl. It takes up space. But sometimes I just feel I have to. I do have about 4 boxes of it I could do without, though. It just sits there.

Bimble, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

Desert Island = merely two boxes of vinyl, methinks.

Bimble, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

new shelves!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2177/1564484515_e6d2ffef22.jpg?v=0

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)

more new shelves!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/1564484353_04181c21fb.jpg?v=0

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)

even more new shelves!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2300/1564574285_a061378559.jpg?v=0

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

new chair to listen in!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2281/1564574193_5c736701e5.jpg?v=0

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

waiting for their own shelves!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2134/1565456024_cb4b0ec065.jpg?v=0

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2121/1564574483_aa6c63f7d7.jpg?v=0

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

now i just need shelves for 45s. and tapes. and CDs. and more records. maybe before i am dead everything will be in full view.

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

u go to ikea, scott?

hstencil, Sunday, 14 October 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)

Never, ever move. My back starts to hurt just thinking about you moving.

Mark Rich@rdson, Sunday, 14 October 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

Fantastic, Scott. Cheers.

Bimble, Sunday, 14 October 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

but yeah, mate. don't EVER move.

Bimble, Sunday, 14 October 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

I still buy ONLY vinyl, but generally thru' e-bay.

PhilK, Sunday, 14 October 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

"u go to ikea, scott?"

yeah! it's crazy there. i posted those pictures to the ikea thread on ile actually.

scott seward, Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

Never, ever move. My back starts to hurt just thinking about you moving.

The last time I moved I thought I was being smart putting a big chunk of my vinyl in a cardboard box about the height of a fridge/freezer combo. This isn't at all smart unless you're the world's strongest man or fancy fucking your back up big time, which I was probably quite lucky not to do

DJ Mencap, Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

Phil, can I come over to your house for a listening party?

Bimble, Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)

I buy reggae vinyl even though it is expensive because I am a reggae DJ and I do not know any other way to DJ and can not be bothered to learn any other way to DJ.

roxymuzak, Sunday, 14 October 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)

the shelves look good, but i don't know about that chair.

QuantumNoise, Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

"Never, ever move. My back starts to hurt just thinking about you moving.

-- Mark Rich@rdson"

haha, thats not even that many records. i moved 2 years ago, my boss (owner of the record shop i work at) moved last year, and my best friend moved this year. that shit was seriously too much. hopefully by the time any of us move again, we will be less broke and we will pay people to move the records for us! the worst part is, my and my best friend's records went up to the third floor of our respective new houses. argh. my guess is that in total, we moved 20,000 12"s at least between the 3 of us.

pipecock, Monday, 15 October 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

"the shelves look good, but i don't know about that chair."

it's a recliner! it's very comfortable. i can go completely horizontal. plus, it was only ten bucks.

scott seward, Monday, 15 October 2007 02:22 (eighteen years ago)

i'm getting those ikea shelves once i move in a few months. i've got these older ikea shelves which fit records perfectly, but one day they collapsed (with all my records) and now they're being held up with duct tape and old, heavy speakers. physics saved my records. i was pulling out a kate bush record when it happened and for a brief moment i thought that i'd be vinyl-less and depressed save one copy of 'the sensual world'.

omar little, Monday, 15 October 2007 02:30 (eighteen years ago)

I actually just got those IKEA expedit shelves too, and -- while they're great -- I kind of regret the purchase. I think I might sell them and just get big plastic shelves that I can put crates on. I'm a DJ and I can't flip through my records anymore. Instead, they're all filed. The IKEA system would probably work if I could keep everything genre-categorized and alphabetized, but that ain't gonna happen.

Romeo Jones, Monday, 15 October 2007 05:05 (eighteen years ago)

I was so traumatized by these crappy "shelves" I bought years ago -- particle board that bowed immediately -- that I went out to the hardware store and bought thick solid wood planks and then anchored them at each end and in the middle with metal milk crates. Looks "industrial." "Shitty" might be more accurate. But it works.

As for moving, this point may be moot by now, but last time I moved it was VIDEOTAPES that screwed my back up. Thinking those little plastic VCR tapes didn't weigh much, I managaed to pack a huge box with them that when it came time to lift proved to be worse than an air conditioner. I sold most of my books before the move, but never once thought about trashing the videotapes, most of which I haven't watched since I moved, of course...but they look swell on the wall on top of my records...

smurfherder, Monday, 15 October 2007 05:58 (eighteen years ago)

i want solid, non-warping, preferably non-plastic or cardboard 7" boxes. and a crate for new LPs and stuff i'm listening to (my shelves are downstairs and in the bedroom, stereo i usually listen to in the living room).

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Monday, 15 October 2007 07:09 (eighteen years ago)

"Phil, can I come over to your house for a listening party?"

if you don't mind being subjected to hours of Chrome and Savage Republic, then of course you can!

PhilK, Monday, 15 October 2007 08:06 (eighteen years ago)

vinyl prices are actually way down on the shit i buy, mostly bcuz of serato

deej, Monday, 15 October 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

just copped a copy of
http://www.dustygroove.com/images/products/w/ware_leon~~_musicalma_101b.jpg

deej, Monday, 15 October 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

it's a recliner! it's very comfortable. i can go completely horizontal. plus, it was only ten bucks.

awesome. i was actually gonna ask you if it was one of those chairs that helps old people get on their feet.

QuantumNoise, Monday, 15 October 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

So carrying on with the IKEA talk above, are the Expedits in it for the long haul? I keep trying to convince my wife I need a couple of the 2x4 ones. I figure this allows more functionality and less a chance of the middle squares collapsing or warping than with the 4x4 or 5x5 ones. But someone tell me about the life span on these things? Those black ones look oh-so-nice.

matt2, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

I've had a white 4x4 expedit for at least 4 years, and it was my sisters for some time before that. It's been dissassembled, moved, moved again, reassembled then moved without dissassembling and it's still 100% sturdy.

dan selzer, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)

Oh my, very good news Dan. My wife really wants the 4x4, so maybe we'll be safe with that one.

matt2, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

they're a bitch to put together, yeah?

omar little, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

so i hear

omar little, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

nah, it's not that bad. make sure to tape the key to the back of it in case you move in a few years.

sanskrit, Monday, 15 October 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

"they're a bitch to put together, yeah?"

once they are up, you kinda forget about the pain and suffering.

scott seward, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 02:29 (eighteen years ago)

i guess i should have explained that the 2nd picture i posted is of two smaller black ikea shelves on their sides. one on top of the other. but people probably figured that out. they fit really nicely like that in the corner.

scott seward, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 02:33 (eighteen years ago)

ikea has saved my life with regard to record storage solutions. well, ikea and jed_e_3 who installed them.

stirmonster, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 03:31 (eighteen years ago)

i've been getting stuff mailordered from hard to find records lately - you don't get the 'thrill' of flipping through 18,000 dusty robert palmer and englebert humperdinck long players but they offer a really good service - you can say you're interested in something, they add you to a queue of people also interested, and when that record comes in the person at the top of the list gets an email about it. pretty cool!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 09:59 (eighteen years ago)

accompanied someone on a dig in upper street (flashback/haggle) (reckless rip) yesterday.

could not get into it again at all. AT ALL.

probly 4 the best though.

r|t|c, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 11:17 (eighteen years ago)

also these days knowing i could d/l and be listening to something like that leon ware in like, 4 minutes tops kills everything really. fucking great album tho. and can it really be that no g-funk dude ever sampled 'share your love'?!?! easiest money ever.

r|t|c, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 11:25 (eighteen years ago)

I never liked looking through huge amounts of LPs to find something good for too long. The web has made it even more boring though, because now many used records stores often look up the value of stuff online, so there are even less big surprise bargains to be found.

Also, my neighborhood store wants twice as much for their ratty copy of "The Kick Inside" than the CD costs new. Bah!

Oh, I sometimes buy vinyl. I feel more odd these days for still buying a lot of CDs. Vinyl is a sort of fetish thing a lot of people "get", while buying CDs is seen as old-fashioned and stupid.

Øystein, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 11:41 (eighteen years ago)

There are 2x4 Expedits? This is the solution that I've been looking for [Also my wife, who is tired of my small, but annoying collection of LPs cluttering up the guestroom.]

fukasaku tollbooth, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)

Yes indeed fukasaku tollbooth as seen in Scott's picture above and here on the US IKEA website: http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/70103085

My question is did folks actually anchor their shelves to the wall and how much of a pain was it? And is it necessary?

matt2, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, I sometimes buy vinyl. I feel more odd these days for still buying a lot of CDs. Vinyl is a sort of fetish thing a lot of people "get", while buying CDs is seen as old-fashioned and stupid.

Yea, I'm the only person I know of among my friends who still buys CDs regularly. It's not bad though, as the market for used cds is becoming somewhat similar to that of vinyl maybe 10 or 15 years ago (maybe not that great, but still). I've found a ton of great used cds in past couple years, even a lot of recent, well-reviewed stuff, in used bins for less than $6. But I still buy tons of new cds.

Vinyl is still, for the most part, a great deal. There are still plenty of places that charge no more than a $1 per record. And you can often find good deals on used vinyl on Discogs, etc., other online places.

What does suck, though, as was mentioned above, is that a lot of the better-curated shops are now realizing that vinyl is seen more as this fetish sort of thing, that they'll charge $15 for a used LP (in many cases a lot more). Here in DC, a couple new vinyl shops have opened in the past year or so. They often have a lot of decent stock, but the prices keep going up.

I hardly ever download stuff, but I think I probably will in the future. So long as vinyl prices don't get too exorbitant, I might just start buying vinyl for the product/home listening, and then downloading the mp3s for the convenience. I'm sure I'll still buy cds here and there, though, especially since used cds are just going to get cheaper and cheaper.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 13:54 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/1564484353_04181c21fb.jpg?v=0

i guess i should have explained that the 2nd picture i posted is of two smaller black ikea shelves on their sides. one on top of the other. but people probably figured that out. they fit really nicely like that in the corner.

-- scott seward, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 02:33 (11 hours ago) Link

this pic made me doubletake, i have long bookshelves and a 2x4 expedit in a corner, which is slightly too small to add another. the wife is going to get me another 2x4 for my birthday, she thought of fitting 2 by putting them on their side and stacking much like you did. does this work? any undue stress? i'm pretty sure they're built to lie any way you choose.

sanskrit, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/212/518440591_877a9bdbe7.jpg

Except those shelves are all full now, and there is a fourth box of 45s now. plus a big stack of free 45s that should be sitting next to the turntable. i dunno what i'm gonna do. maybe sell some stuff. i'm moving the table outta the room though, to move my stereo under the window, so if i really need to i can maybe fit some more shelves in the corner.

ian, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)

i like vinyl, it's cool.
i just bought two replacement stylii from J&R, via amazon actually. my turntable is nothin special, but i was noticing how warn down and slightly bent my needle was the other day, and i knew my records deserved better.

ian, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

also these days knowing i could d/l and be listening to something like that leon ware in like, 4 minutes tops kills everything really. fucking great album tho. and can it really be that no g-funk dude ever sampled 'share your love'?!?! easiest money ever.

-- r|t|c, Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:25 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Link

hah i had this thought too re: 'share your love'

to me there is an element of lifestyle accoutrement to my record purchases. i'm definitely not a 'collector' in the soulstrut sense either ... the prizing of rarity is pretty minimal to me. I like all the albums i own on vinyl but the albums i own on vinyl dont really represent my music taste anywhere near 100%, or even 60%; its mostly disco + some quiet storm/sexytime R&B shit, a few rap singles, dj quik lps and random one-off things i enjoy that i come across for cheap. i've dj'd a couple parties and at small clubs a couple times around town and that x bachelor pad music is pretty much the extent of my interest. Plus i love the album art (see: the ware record upthread)

deej, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

all you dudes are a bunch of slobs ;)

QuantumNoise, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

I need a better way to store my 7"s. I have 4 or so boxes from Boxes Unlimited that sit on top of one of my record shelves (an expensive custom job I had made in the days prior to the Expedit) and then I just have piles of 7"s everywhere. I need shelves for them. Any ideas?

dan selzer, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

Dan, I snap up old beat-up antique boxes, which fit 7"s perfectly. I then store them on my shelving unit.

QuantumNoise, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

buying vinyl for the product/home listening, and then downloading the mp3s for the convenience.

This is what I do... I still buy CDs though, mostly new releases that aren't on vinyl/are too expensive on vinyl.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

New Balance shoe boxes fit 45's pretty well but the tops of the 45's will stick out the top so you cant stack them. its easy for going through them though.

pipecock, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

As many have pointed out, it looks like vinyl will outlive CD. I'd like our next release to be vinyl-only with a code to download for a DRM-free digital download included in the price. A good idea? Too soon?

caek, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

united record pressing is running a deal on this right now, complete with hosting and tokens of some sort. i don't know if its a good deal though.

Brigadier Pudding, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

Vinyl only is always a good idea!

ian, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:16 (eighteen years ago)

URP's download voucher + vinyl service looks interesting. Anyone know of anything similar in the UK/Europe?

caek, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

My Electrelane LP came with a download voucher, but I had err ... already downloaded it.

Alba, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

I just bought the Metal Box reissue. It's soooo hot. and not a bad deal for $40.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

There's this grim looking record shop near my house that I drove by countless times. I was always curious but finally stopped by last weekend. The place is a mess (as I expected) but is a veritable gold mine for old vinyl. I found a Stranglers Live record (X-Cert) that I have been hunting for for years. Also got the "Miles in the Sky" LP. Thee appears to be tons of old psych. records as well but I am going to need at least a few hours to dig around.

I had no idea places like this still existed.

Yes...vinyl lives.

kwhitehead, Wednesday, 9 January 2008 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

"I just bought the Metal Box reissue. It's soooo hot. and not a bad deal for $40."

you shouldve got an original from ebay for that real analogue to analogue experience ;)

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

haha yeah, they actually had one at the store but it was 100 bucks!

to be a real vinyl a-hole though, i've had metal box on mp3/cd and a friend brought the reissue over and i kinda had to have it...it's really like a totally different record on vinyl, at least compared to the shitty mastered cheapie CD version (they should do some kinda nice deluxe one someday) that i have...i never really got the deep bass like a reggae record before, it doesn't sound brittle or tinny at all like i thought before.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:25 (eighteen years ago)

thats odd - i like it on cd too. i have the cd that came in a metal cd case which im guessing was made in the 90s/80s (avoiding cd reissues/remasters that came out in the last ten years is my new passion) and it sounds pretty good. the vinyl just of course sounds fuller and richer though, and if i didnt find the packaging so fiddly i would probably get it out more often.

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

@caek:

Our new album </spam> is only available as vinyl (with free mp3 download coupon) or as digital files (on Amazon, iTunes, etc.). Not sure if it will be a "success," but it wasn't too hard to do (one of our band members is a database coder), and the vinyl definitely sounds better than the CDRs I've burned.

schwantz, Thursday, 10 January 2008 00:53 (eighteen years ago)

i have the cd that came in a metal cd case which im guessing was made in the 90s/80s

mine isn't in a metal case, it's just a really bad blurry picture of (i think) lydon and there's really no liner notes or anything, it says "second edition" not metal box, so maybe yours is a newer, better version

i mean i liked it on CD, until i heard the vinyl, and it was pretty different sounding to me.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:12 (eighteen years ago)

my cd is in a metal box. i got it sometime in the 90s when it came out.

Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:15 (eighteen years ago)

hmm i must have some shitty jewelcase version. it sounds more like an 80s cd, mastering and soundwise

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:27 (eighteen years ago)

yeah second edition cd sounds like crap, i think the metal tin one is a large improvement

resolved, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:34 (eighteen years ago)

schwantz, that's exactly what I have in mind. Do you know if your authentication system for the download codes is totally home-brewed by your bandmate, or are you using something off the shelf? How many shots are you giving people at downloads? One, three, as many as they like?

caek, Thursday, 10 January 2008 01:47 (eighteen years ago)

Answers:

"1) Totally homebrewed.

2) All the tokens sent out with records have a max of 5 download attempts."

schwantz, Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

thanks

caek, Friday, 11 January 2008 01:08 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/06/vinyl-sales-to-hit-another-high-point-in-2009.html

Vinyl sales to hit another high point in 2009
01:40 PM PT, Jun 11 2009

The resurgent vinyl market isn't showing any signs of slowing down. In fact, recent figures released by Nielsen SoundScan indicate that overall U.S. vinyl sales will once again set a benchmark in 2009, with sales up 50% through the first five months of the year. SoundScan predicts vinyl sales will reach 2.8 million units in 2009, up from 1.9 million in 2008, a record since SoundScan began tracking sales data in 1991. Already in 2009, vinyl sales have topped 1 million. At this point last year, vinyl sales stood at 701,000 copies. To be fair, the number is still tiny compared to overall album sales.

Vinyl, SoundScan points out, accounts for less than 1% of overall album sales. In other words, vinyl sales represent about six months in the life of Taylor Swift, whose late 2008 release, "Fearless," has already sold more than 3.3 million copies. To date in 2009, 121.8 million CDs have been sold, versus 33.2 million digital albums, compared to 151.01 million CDs and 27.52 digital albums for the same period last year.

Yet vinyl appears to be a niche market that's here to stay, and one that's showing signs of expansion. Rock albums account for 70% of all vinyl sold, but country vinyl is enjoying a growth spurt. Year-to-date country vinyl sales are already at 15,000 copies, compared with 5,000 for the comparable period in 2008.

Of course, if someone wants to rain on the vinyl good news, there's this stat: Vinyl sales were up 90% in 2008 over 2007, and the rate of growth has certainly slowed.

-- Todd Martens

Bee OK, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

i had a great day selling vinyl!

scott seward, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:39 (sixteen years ago)

the store going well skot? : )

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:41 (sixteen years ago)

Haha the pic in that article was taken in a store just down the street from my apartment!

I left all my vinyl in the UK and have only bought CDs for the last five years (and downloaded a ton), but recently got a turntable and am now sort of selling them all off in favor of rebuilding my collection around records (VINYL records) I really love. So now I really do get to buy my favorite records a second time around, which I always wanted to do anyway. This probably has as much to do with me as the format, but CDs seem oddly throwaway and records tend to encourage me to listen a bit deeper. Also yes it's nice that LA suddenly has a couple of new vinyl-only stores even if their selections are frustratingly "vanilla" (vinylla?). Also I'm just getting old.

Ian and Scott are my heroes on this thread.

admrl, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:46 (sixteen years ago)

i went to amoeba in LA for the first time. it was too overwhelming.

plus i thought the prices on used vinyl were kinda spendy overall.

i ended up buying an arvo part CD they had a great used classical cd collection

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

yeah I kind of forgot that records are pretty expensive. Atomic in Burbank is pretty reasonable though

admrl, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

i think i might just be spoiled a little in mpls as compared to west coast prices maybe

though the most evil fucks in the entire ebay vinyl industry now opened a store here

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

i sold a lot of used tapes today too!

scott seward, Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:57 (sixteen years ago)

i really need to find a cassette deck

i would never want a book's autograph (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 11 June 2009 22:59 (sixteen years ago)

what kinda cassettes you got (not to derail a vinyl thread). I've got a tapedeck in my car (and it hates those CD/ipod adapters for some reason) so I'm always on the hunt for cheap tapes to crank while driving.

tylerw, Thursday, 11 June 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

oh mostly rap and metal. some kid bought, like, 12 tapes today and he got music of the andes, a dead kennedys bootleg, a dri album, a kool moe dee album, a couple of sonic youth albums, and some other stuff.

scott seward, Friday, 12 June 2009 00:33 (sixteen years ago)

ten years pass...

Interesting profile of a historic L.A. pressing plant that’s shutting down: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2020-01-27/rainbo-records-vinyl-pressing-plant-closes

Black Flag’s “TV Party” 7-inch single? Richard Pryor’s first comedy album for Laff Records? Both pressed by Rainbo, as was “Panic Zone,” N.W.A’s 1987 debut 12-inch, Dr. Dre’s “The Chronic,” Hüsker Dü’s “Zen Arcade” and the Minutemen’s “Double Nickels on the Dime” albums for SST and 2Pac’s “California Love.” (...)

One imposing 300-page book from the mid-1990s tracks orders from punk labels including Epitaph, SST, Touch and Go, Frontier and In the Red; rap imprints Death Row, Priority, Delicious Vinyl, Cold Chillin’ and Sugar Hill; early dance labels Moonshine, Mushroom and Thump; and Concord Jazz, Rhino, Scotti Bros. and American.

dad genes (morrisp), Tuesday, 28 January 2020 04:35 (six years ago)

I started buying vinyl again. The ex gave me of his technics. So hooked it up. It’s great. Immediately went out and bought a few recs (nas, soulwax,...)

nathom, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:10 (six years ago)

My mate has been transitioning from decades of CDs back to vinyl, and taking the opportunity to thin out his library and really focus on stuff he loves. I admire his restraint!

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:35 (six years ago)

yes, I just wrote a blog post about it

https://critterjams.wordpress.com/2020/01/24/on-becoming-an-insufferable-vinyl-dude-again/

back when this was a big hobby for me (say, 2004-2006) there were a ton of albums I could only dream of ever getting on vinyl that are now getting repressed. so that's cool. whats not cool (as I mentioned on the other thread) is that you can't just get a stack of Devo & XTC records for $20 anymore

frogbs, Tuesday, 28 January 2020 21:37 (six years ago)

five months pass...

was just thinking yesterday "man I've got a lot of stuff still in the post"

today:

https://i.imgur.com/eFunVSE.jpg

happy Friday y'all

frogbs, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:19 (five years ago)

I've never bought vinyl because I've never owned a record player and because shit's expensive. It's an evergreen hip habit I wouldn't mind cultivating some day, though.

pomenitul, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:21 (five years ago)

yea I used to be concerned that I was spending too much when I'd buy 5-6 LPs every week for 20-30 bucks, now there's a ton of shit I regret not picking up for a few bucks when I had the chance. most recently No. 1 in Heaven by Sparks

frogbs, Friday, 24 July 2020 16:24 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.