― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)
My urine.
Haha...sorry, someone had to do it.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)
fuck man, she's a dumb teenager. she's NO DIFFERENT from any other 17/18 yr old from Buttfuck Ont, except people listen to her. She's a fucking high school drop out, so take her with a g. of salt. -- Horace Mann (handsomishbo...), February 24th, 2003. (later)
these are some of the most laughably knee-jerk elitist classist ageist anti-punk pro-status quo statements ever made on ilm
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)
-- Jonathan Williams (x...) (webmail), February 24th, 2003
how in the hell does this even follow?
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff K (jeff k), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)
mark s, are you out there?
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
what does that have to do with being "punk" alex?
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. 2. n. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that they have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." Compare kook. 3. n. [Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners.
Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See also Troll-O-Meter.
The use of `troll' in either sense is a live metaphor that readily produces elaborations and combining forms. For example, one not infrequently sees the warning "Do not feed the troll" as part of a followup to troll postings.
-- The Jargon File
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)
Were it not for the accompanying visuals of her videos, her music is indistinguishable from virtually every other pop moppet clogging up the charts.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Scott Seward, Monday, 24 February 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
She is so fucking punk rock that the very sight of her makes people wanna beat her up! You have to be really punk to get people to hate you so much.
Nerds/goths/jocks/sluts/popular kids/everyone is punk!
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Scott Seward, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
Secondly, I don't give a fuck how one describes POP, but when someone who has absolutely fuck-all to do with Punk Rock starts creating the impression that she is Punk, I get agitated.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Scott Seward, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff K (jeff k), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― james wright, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)
Plonk.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)
So yes, the Ramones are not punk .. meaning .. it's not "punk" in and of itself to be into the Ramones. They're only punk because of their association with the origin of the style.
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Scott Seward, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Buttons? A Zipper?
I like Avril's album, I also like Slayer.
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)
(haha, yet i'm in this thread. is that punk???)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)
so anything the peasants might like is not punk? what are you, louis quatorze?
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)
in laymans terms
the question is not "is avril punk or not"
the question is "why do you care?" -> why is popness is the guise of punk SUCH A MASSIVE AFFRONT to you?
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― james wright, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)
Mark asked the question is not "is avril punk or not" - the question is "why do you care?" -> why is popness is the guise of punk SUCH A MASSIVE AFFRONT to you?
`Cos it's a fuckin' LIE! Avril hasn't EARNED the RIGHT to call herself a Punk, god fuckin' dammit. I don't know about the rest of you kiddy kids, but time was when declaring alleigance to Punk Rock came with a price! It wasn't something you could go out and fuckin' buy ! It took a bit more work and committment to search out the music. It wasn't just a goddamn Halloween costume. I know there's this warped contingent here on ILM that likes to make ridiculous statements like "The Ramones aren't Punk" or "Duran Duran's 'the Chauffeur' is a Goth staple," and while Punk Rock itself was gradually subsumed, defanged, housebroken and eventually slain by the mainstream, the very term "Punk" still MEANS something to some people, and to see little whistleheaded posers like Avril or Shania dress up in some of the surface-level trappings of Punk Rock is OFFENSIVE! So, on behalf of the Ramones, the Pistols, Black Flag and a host of other legitimate Punk Rock luminaries, lemme say it again -- AVRIL LAVIGNE HAS FUCKING NOTHING TO DO WITH PUNK ROCK!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Julio: If you can point out how the negative things I've said about Avril make me misogynistic, I'd appreciate it.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― schnell schnell, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
old man: i fought in the war for the likes of you!
beatle: bet you're sorry you won.
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― schnell schnell, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― schnell schnell, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Fair point, Dan, but Avril remains a slickly marketed, crassly prefabricated dollop of pabulum to be force-fed to a gullibe nation of zombified TRL heads, not some free spirited, system-bucking maverick as she's portrayed.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
oh, how i missed that
i don't think avril is marketed half as "insidiously" as many here might like to believe
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)
and where did I specifically accuse you dan of having misogynistic tendencies?
you kept your criticisms to her music (specifically her voice) but I was just looking at some of the other comments on this thread.
sorry if i implied this was abt you. it wasn't.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway, I don't see anything particularly "unpunk" about wanting to pee in Avril's mouth! I think it is quite punk.
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― schnell schnell, Monday, 24 February 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
I think that's 'pretty dumb'.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)
i find it hilarious that you're getting all het and bothered about the re-wrangling of a (super)word that's only changing its relation w/r/t to a whole demographic of people that actual punks completely distanced themselves from (or were alienated by) anyway
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't even like Avril beyond two songs, one of which is NOT Complicated which makes me want to die. But this is all silliness! Punk isn't about earning the right to be anything, that's elitism and rockist. Punk is about people who can't play or fit into the "establishment mold" or whatever getting up and doing their thang.
And after all this, I'm not quite sure why this is even an argument in terms of Avril Lavigne?
Also, what the hell is wrong with being a high school drop out! For a bunch of people who, on ILE, readily ridicule people in the corporate lifestyle for not being real, ya'all sure have some criteron of intelligence in the educational status quo.
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
the funny thing about your argument is it boils down to "don't wear t-shirts i like if you're not someone i'm apt to like" which = "image and surface and symbolism is all important to me", which = exactly the opposite of what you're trying to define as the authenticity ethos you're trying to defend
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
but that's neither here nor there - i'm more interested in how ANGRY people get
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)
(NOTE: Whatever evil and wrong things I said on the DMB thread, I think they're a better band than Avril's band in terms of how I view their talent and their musicianship. However, I'd rather listen to "I'm With You" than almost any DMB song. I am a contradiction wrapped up in a hypocrite.)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
well a lot of ppl in this thread do not hold her up as a 'standard bearer' at all.
In fact what i've seen today is a lot of ppl bitching abt whether Norah is jazz or not (on ILE mostly) and whether avril is punk or not.
categories don't mean too much but I am amused by ppl who are getting worked up by these things.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
And the paradox of "you're telling people how to be punk, and that is SO unpunk" .. is the same as a diversity policy that excludes nazis & racists.
― dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
it's kind of funny how posters who think Avril didn't do any work to become punk (not you specifically Alex) often throw cheap and lazy insults into the ring - dumb Canadian, dumb broad, dumb teenager...
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― order = restored (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Why is that a bad thing?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― i yam da fly (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Are Tatu punk?
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
Avril punk? Pink punk? Well then, Donny & Marie Osmond? Punk. Kramer from Seinfeld? Punk. Chewbacca? Punk. CAPS-LOCK? PUNK.
Everything is "punk" nowadays. Get hip to it.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)
What, you thought the "Doctor" in Dr. Dre was honorary?
(I'm not sure what argument this is that I have been given but I like it anyway!)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― adam (adam), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
Lavinge works with the world's leading global companies in many industries, including information technology, financial services, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, entertainment, petroleum and minerals, professional services, and manufacturing.
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)
FEAR ME FOR I HAVE JUST DONE A PUNK THING!
― Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― one for yr other shoulder ally? (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)
"She knows it."
I wonder if she does?
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)
From what I can tell, the Ramones did nothing to earn the right to be punk - they just got up and made a band. Whose music was no lesspolished than Avril's (for the time, etc).....
What? Ally, dearest, you know I adore the very epidermal detritus that flakes off your pretty scalp, but that is a PATENTLY RIDICULOUS STATEMENT.
That Ramones were indeed inspired by Spector's wall of sound, but they also rabidly ate up music by the Stooges, MC5 and Black Sabbath. Moreover, they didn't work with Spector until their fifth studio album -- and by all accounts, it was not their finest hour.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)
alex: well, she's definitely not punk
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)
Thanks Mark. I appreciate that.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
byob
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)
It's a slippery slope argument, I'll admit it. My violent exhortation about Shania and Avril and whomever else from the Pop World posing in the sartorial trappings of Punk Rock isn't designed to lend creedence to the clothes, but rather to what the clothes REPRESENT! By way of very awkward example, I've never been to Turkmenistan. I know no one in Turkmenistan. I don't speak the language (Turkmenastanian?). I know nothing of their culture. Thus, you don't see me waving the flag of Turkmenistan, nor wearing a t-shirt that reads "HARD ROCK CAFĂ - TURKMENISTAN!" Waving a Turkmenastanian flag would be an empty gesture for me, because I do not identify with the nation it represents in the slightest. Likewise, wearing a shirt that read "Turkmenistananians Kick Ass!", implying some vague semblance of solidarity with a nation of people I know absolutely fuck-all about, would be a hollow lie, and something a native of Turkmenistan would have every right in the world to be dismissive of.
how's that for convoluted?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)
everyone else: "let's not talk about whether avril actually IS punk and discuss issues x, y and z"
alex: "well, she's definitely not punk"
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Are those roulette wheels on the side?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― hello, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)
(this sounds snotty to my pops, but i love him and used to be in a southern rock band with him called Rock Bottom!)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
erm...no!
its not all just a museum piece. there are some good recs (not only in jazz but everywhere elase too but we just don't have the time or at least i don't).
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd get more upset about this if I felt I could possibly be mistaken in some way, but I really am quite confident in my assertion that AVRIL LAVIGNE IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF PUNK ROCK IN THE SLIGHTEST!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, like they say...... IGNORANCE IS BLISS!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)
i don't find avril particularly representative of "punk" either alex, but so many punk-rockers have dual citizenship in the land of pop (ramones, clash, vibrators, only ones, etc), and there's no reason why it can't go both ways.
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Charles McCain, Monday, 24 February 2003 21:52 (twenty-two years ago)
punk is hip-hop! hip-hop is punk! They're two sides of the same movement! And therefore Avril = Punk just as much as Eminem = hip-hop! It's all so clear now!
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)
Epiphone sounds like some sort've device for communicating with epileptics.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 24 February 2003 21:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Charles McCain, Monday, 24 February 2003 22:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh for fuck's sake - fuck punk!
-- Kim (grimstitc...), February 24th, 2003.
J34H!1!!!1!
avr!l rulz fukc all yuo h@t@z
I (heart) avr!l threadz coz they're gr8!!1!1!11!!!
I AM M0R3 PuNK THaN aNY 0V YUO L@M3RZ C0Z I LUV PR0G ROX0R!1!1!1!1!!
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff Sumner (Jeff Sumner), Monday, 24 February 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)
no, indie pop is elevenses, clearly.
Now Avril vs Nelly Furtado, there's a thredd worth starting. Back in 2001, I thought she was the new Madonna, y'know. I've not been proved wrong yet.
Avril is as punk as Green Day or the Sex Pistols but not as punk as The Clash or The Levellers.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 24 February 2003 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)
can we resume normal service now and talk about something we usually talk about, like Av...oh, wait.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Epilady Ultra (Arthur), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Avril Lavigne, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.weretwins.com/strikeforce:euler/capt1046050460
― Matt B. (Matt B.), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 04:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrzej B. (Andrzej B.), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)
Though I thought it was always live.
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Turner, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Robbie Turner, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
She'll have "earned" the right to be punk, then, when she does ANY of the above, which was exactly what the Ramones did to earn that right! She didn't start her own band, doesn't write all her songs, doesn't really play that guitar much if at all, and her music is glossy and overproduced. And I think those were cooties on her coat! Alex, you are correct. She may represent what punk has come to mean to those with no sense of history, or those who have never listened to what punk WAS, but she's not A punk.
― matt riedl (veal), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)