defending the indefensible, pt 1: the doors

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i like to slag the doors and jimbo as much as the next ilmer. we all know the drill, and i won't repeat it.

that said, my boss just had la woman on, and i'll be damned if it isn't pretty good. mojo risin's bullshit is still there, though tempered somewhat by humor (tell me he's not taking the piss on stuff like "crawling king snake" and "been down so long") -- and i've always thought that his "there's a killer on the road/his brain is squirming like a toad" is an unqualified great line. and the music is quite good, which is something for me to say since i normally don't like blooz-shit -- and which leads to a possible conclusion that the problem w/ the doors wasn't so much morrison and his silly lyrics/schtick, but the hamhanded music that backed it on the early recordings.

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:22 (twenty-two years ago)

and i also have a soft spot for the soft parade -- sixties kitsch-pop at its cheesiest, lyrically and musically. though i genuinely like "touch me," "wild child," and "the soft parade" (the latter for its sheer ridiculous fusion of sixties cheez-pop, chugging rock and dumbass morrison mumbo-jumbo.

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:24 (twenty-two years ago)

well... I sort of agree. I have always felt that the Doors were at their best when Morrison had the least amount of influence... as a newcomer on "The Doors", & as a fading wasted presence on "L A Woman"... the latter is the only one I own...

autovac (autovac), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)

They are entertaining proto-goth for when you are 18 and dropping acid for the first time. But apart from that...

Erm, I'd just like to point out the trousers. That is all.

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:43 (twenty-two years ago)

eh.....peacefrog is stunning, they had the funk and no mistake - in fact the whole of morrison hotle is fantastic. Pah to you Tad

james (james), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:46 (twenty-two years ago)

i kinda like morrison hotel, too! and yer right, "peace frog"'s got the funk (though jimbo's lyrics are "funky" in that they come close to stinkin' up the jam). but morrison hotel gets in 'cause that's the doors in greasy-blooz mode.

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:44 (twenty-two years ago)

ha i tht the "morrison hotle" was a cool new term for jimbo's mojo! IT IS NOW!

i like all the doors EXCEPT morrison but hey, he's the one who got them in one place so he's OK too, on the "julia lennon is the fifth beatle" principle

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Erm, I'd just like to point out the trousers. That is all.

Everett True to thread.

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Apparently they smelled. BAAAAAD!

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)

They wrote a whole load of great tunes, the band were all excellent musicians, when they are on point (When the Music's Over) they are stunning.

Alex K (Alex K), Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)

They wrote a whole load of great tunes, the band were all excellent musicians, when they are on point they are stunning.

Well, could you be any more general if you tried? I can't think of a single band that someone loves that they could not describe that way. (Unless they are punk and *not* being excellent musicians is the point.)

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

they were a great singles band. their songs are fun to sing along to. all their albums had really weird songs on them. cuz they were weirdos.Sometimes, when i hear them, i think,"Nick Cave wishes"! I mean "The Crystal Ship" and "The End"? "Riders On The Storm" is so dreamy too. yah, they were cool, even if i haven't heard them in years. i even like "The Unknown Soldier". Does everyone hate them on ILM. Or just that classic Rawk hoo-hah that they represent. i mean, i always thought that the myth and the poetry and the trousers were really funny. in a spinal tap way.but the songs are cool. "Touch Me" and "Hello, I Love You" are great too.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Ah. Sorry bout that Kate. Lemme get back to you on that one.

Alex K (Alex K), Thursday, 12 June 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

How in God's name does one CLEAN sweat stains et al. from leather pants, anyway?

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)

You get them professionally dry cleaned. Ha-HEM.

(Though I've found that for making leather less smelly, the best thing to do is hang them in the bathroom while taking a really steamy and hot shower, and that will generally get most smells out.)

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd imagine though that putting the leather in a moist environment would make it more susceptible to attacks by smell-bringing mold. I guess you'd have to thoroughly dry it, then, afterwards.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)

defending the indefensible, pt 2: leather pants

stevie (stevie), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)

''and the music is quite good, which is something for me to say since i normally don't like blooz-shit''

so what is ''blooz-shit''? are you just referring to blues in general or what?

I like every note and every vocal from that first album of theirs. I have heard a bit of LA woman actually and jim sounds drunk. One of the best examples examples of 'so bad its good'.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never worn leather pants in my life! (though I know a scary biker chick who hath!) Leather trousers, however = ultra-classic. I own several pairs.

You know, it's one of the main reasons that the Dandy Warhols went electro - their guitarist stopped wearing leather trousers!

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Defending the indefensible, pt 3: The Verve and all the bands that came before them

The Doors would've been OK, if they'd dropped the student art-wanker of a singer, and that fucking horibble dribbling keyboard sound, written a couple of memorable songs, lost all their pseudo-religious fixations, not actually released a record, and been incarcerated at birth

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh...

And the leather trousers of course

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh...

And the drugs

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh

I've never forgiven them for the "sixties" either

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh...

And did ANYONE really enjoy having wanker Morrison's scrawny little dick waved in their faces?

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)

You hurt me! In my heart! Well, not necessarily my heart, but definintely my libido. Say what you like about the Doors, but LEAVE LEATHER TROUSERS OUT OF IT!

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn it Kate.

if you wanna have a role model for leather trousers, go for Stephen Pastel (actually, I've never forgiven the Doors for that either). Or Astrid whatsername

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Or do I mean Ingrid?

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Something "id" anyway

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Bobby G. Iggy Pop. Daniel Ash. And yes, you are thinking of Astrid K.

The trousers were the best thing about the Doors, do not dis them.

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)

That b+w Manchester footage is good - the keys/drums raw excellence

s.r.w. (s.r.w.), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

well, yeah, i mean if you don't like their singer or the music or leather pants or drugs than you probably won't like the doors to much.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks scott. leave these retards with all their 'Loaded' era velvet underground hell.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)

What *is* the difference between the Velvet Underground and the Doors, really? And don't say "talent".

Exactly what people love about the VU - the darkness and the drugs and the leather trousers and the arty affectations - are what the same people loathe about the Doors. And vice versa.

Have we had this taking sides yet?

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

well julio, you know, you are inadvertently bringing up a good point. if you don't like melodramatic rock music, the 60's, drugs, and leather pants then there is no way that you could like the stooges or the velvet underground. i happen to like all those things.(iggy started the stooges after seeing the doors-you can thank the doors for that if you are a stooges fan)

kate, i wrote the above and then saw your post.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, Scott. I've just started another thread on this:

Taking Sides: The Velvet Underground vs. The Doors

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

...I'd say, when JM decides he wants to be a rock singer instead of his erroneous vision of Rimbaud might have been like, he was a damned good one: "Love Me Two Times" is a great, nuanced performance, and "Love Her Madly" from the L.A. Woman album would be, too, if not for the lame Jimbo bridge ("all your love is gone/so sing a lonely song" OK OK, but "of a deep blue dream/seven horses seem/to/be/on/the/mark" and I may have the last phrase wrong but really once the seven horses came in who could care what he's actually saying?). "People Are Strange" hardly needs defending, and I love his delivery of the opening lines of "The Crystal Ship" although that song's potency increases exponentially if you tinker with the lyrics until they're about chocolate pies. Mmmm, chocolate.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)

the crystal ship really is the prototype for all goth-rock to come. same with "you're lost little girl" and not just because siouxsie covered it.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, not really..."Venus in Furs" if the prototype for goth (at least for female-sung-darkwave goth) and the VU was a big influence on the Doors. (Or at least on Morrison and Manzarek.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Venus in Furs was sung by a bloke. I think you are thinking of All Tomorrows Parties.

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean the flavor of "Venus in Furs" (every gothgirl band I've ever heard seems to whip out Venus in Furs as their big live number...)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

''well julio, you know, you are inadvertently bringing up a good point. if you don't like melodramatic rock music, the 60's, drugs, and leather pants then there is no way that you could like the stooges or the velvet underground. i happen to like all those things.(iggy started the stooges after seeing the doors-you can thank the doors for that if you are a stooges fan)''

hey scott I love the first two velvets records. after john cale left, not so good I'd say. And in fact lots of what the velvets did after cale left ended up being copied by awful indie bands from the 80s (in the UK this)=> i was sort of replying to jerry.

as i said i like doors and velvets up to cale. I like drugs (though i haven't taken them) and leather pants (I haven't worn them heh but i'm all for women wearing 'em) but I'm not that keen on the stooges. the guitars don't do much for me.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)

somebody has to tell me the chronology again. weren't they independent of each other. Their debuts came out the same year, no? i know they met each other. the doors played that legendary residency in new york somewhere before anyone knew who they were, right? did they go see V.U. while they were there? i'm a little hazy on the specifics.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

not even the first stooges album, julio? the one with all those short, sweet, perfect chamber-punk pieces on it?

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

somebody has to tell me the chronology again.
VU then Doors then Stooges, I think. Lemme check.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)

V.U. and Doors formed in 65, recorded in 66, and had albums out by 67, no? i might have that wrong.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I've heard funhouse and a couple of tracks off the first record and I have to say that there wasn't enough distortion (I know that's stupid but that's why I didn't get round to it => I listen to psych etc and some jap bands who do that kind of thing and are more satisfying i suppose)

what does 'chamber-punk' mean? (I think i know but i'm not sure)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Official from AMG:
Velvet Underground and Nico - Jan 1967 (release) inprint
Doors - Jan 1967 (release) inprint
Stooges - 1969 (release) inprint

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

The Doors were a fantastic singles band. I can't think of a single track off of their best-of that I dislike.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

i seem to recall that V.U. or at least warhol were more interested in the doors then the other way round. the doors hadn't heard V.U. when they made their album. not that it sounds like V.U. or anything.just similar vibe on stuff like the end.maybe i'm just remembering that dumb movie or that book i read in the 8th grade by danny sugarman.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

chamber-punk, meaning, Cale took the anarchic sound that the stooges already had by that point and compressed it into these perfect miniatures that had the subject matter of punk-boredom,nihilism,getting high-and the simple primitivism of punk, but were in fact these elegant little nuggets that stylistically go way beyond the dirt-simple stuff of the day.it's an art punk album, really.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

OK scott.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

cale was obviously interested in repetition/drone and the possibilities of rock incorporating those ideas. bowie had a different vision. he wanted it to sound like the band was drowning beneath their own noise and misery. funhouse is really the only case where they sound like they are free of other poeple's ideas of what they should sound like. maybe that's why i find it so liberating.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Despite old leather trews being a bit of a wanker he's one of the great rock crooners. No wonder Jose Feliciano rushed to cover Light my fire. Imagine if Sinatra had been born 30 years and had listened to Howlin' Wolf instead of cutting his chops with Tommy Dorsey later his band would have probably sounded something like the Doors.

Plus old Frankie wouldn't have got his dick out, he knew it would have scared the audience.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

i seem to recall that V.U. or at least warhol were more interested in the doors then the other way round. the doors hadn't heard V.U. when they made their album.
Um, no...its the other way around. Morrison based alot of his stage persona/total package on a mixture of what he saw from two sources:
1) Julian Beck's Living Theatre
2) Andy Warhol's Exploding Plastic Inevitable
(granted JBLT had a more noticeable effect...but AWEPI is in there somewhere.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

aha, well thanks, custos, my memory ain't what it used to be. better those than anthony newley and mime i suppose.

scott seward, Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Ouch.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Defending the indefensible, pt 3: The Verve

The Verve has problems. When they were just Verve, I fight thee to the death.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Spiritualized + Doors = Verve.

kate (kate), Thursday, 12 June 2003 13:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I always find it funny that some who have every Nuggets, Pebbles, bizarro German import psych freak beat 60s collection or is a devout believer in "Forever Changes" slags off The Doors. It happens, but I don't understand the reasoning, as it is pretty much the same kind of thing.

The only couple of old 60s record collectors guys that I know whom were buying all of these records new love The Doors as much if not more than any other sixties bands. (As a side note, it also seems like Cream was a bigger/more popular/highly regarded band back in that era than now, where they are more of a side note to Clapton's solo career.)

I've always liked The Doors and have listened to them more than the VU, but not as much as The Stooges. I definitely like The Doors more than The Beatles.

earlnash, Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Why The Doors are Good or How I Learned to Get Over Jim’s Leather Trousers and Start Loving.

The thing about the Doors is, is that a lot of people are just not going to ‘get’ the beauty of the whole mythmaking rock and roll, love, excess, getting high and chasing experience thing, or at least, they’re just not gonna identify with it. They see the beer boys nodding along with ‘Light My Fire’ which is being played on the rock radio for the 100 trillionth time, and this helps them confirm to themselves that The Doors are music for knuckleheads, teenagers or the lowest ilx denomination, the critically inept rockist. I toasted The Doors before on here and was caned by the cognoscenti, but since my previous post today was just to nail my colours to the mast, after Kate skewered me, I figured I’d try again to tie up just why The Doors are genius.

With the Doors, I’m not sure that attempting to interrogate the music via sober de riguer phraseology and critique will get to the heart of what this band is about for me. I’m not interested in trying to cut through the myth and the magic with these boys – for me, that’s exactly what it’s all about here. I’d put Morrison on a pedestal just because he can yell ‘C’mon’ and mean it harder, and fill the howl with more resonance than virtually anyone else.

There is a separation between critical language and human emotion. Though the two may be intertwined and informed in a million myriad ways, there remains a distinction, a separation between the prick of nostalgia and lateral analysis, between blinking euphoria and writing a review. For me, the carnal, sweating, hypnotic thrash of the Doors in full flow was an attempt to overload the senses and prise the lid off your mind. I’m up for a bit of that, as it happens, and though Jim makes me laugh with his often deluded warblings, turning the volume up full and soaking it all up is sometimes a truly powerful experience. I don’t mind that Morrison wore leather trousers if he’s prepared to act the fool or the piper on such a grand scale and tell me in terrifying detail about his existential trips in this world and his slipping grip.

I believe that rock and roll is an ethos, not a badge to stitch on. Like anything in this world it is comprised of cliché and riddled with stereotype, but for me, all unabashed here, rock and roll in part, is something electrifying and intangible. It’s another word for Other and though its original has long since been assimilated, reproduced and sold back as another fucking badge, there are still strands to the grand story and idea to cherish. There are words that I can use to explain its parameters but without actually living these words, rock and roll will always just remain a critical category on the page. You can’t understand its possibilities without tasting them yourself. And you can’t understand The Doors without diving in and getting your hands dirty.

What I’m saying, in a stupid roundabout way, is that it seems a pretty empty task, picking apart The Doors in detached critical terms. They are a band that cry out to be lauded as shamanic, dangerous, unpredictable rollers. Shower clichés on them man – they helped start the whole fucking thing anyway – Morrison wrote his name all over the late 60’s. Their music and power doesn’t come from being confounding or elusive or oblique. If you are prepared to subscribe or at least suspend your reservations, what you get is a three-piece psychedelic blues outfit led by a drug-crazed desperado with an urge to provoke. You get anthems and calls to arms, you get protests and sex and danger and blood, you get the shimmering void and the dance of death. You get a wild black clad preacher babbling over-the-top inanities in between joyful exaltations to adoring crowds or uncomprehending beer halls and there is something beautiful, and powerful, and poignant perhaps, about that.

The Doors lived man. They clearly had a wild ride and they represented, on a grand scale, just like The Stones did, an alternative to greyness and boredom and the same old same old. If you know how it is to fall into black depression despising the shape of your face, to dance on a bar-top, to fuck someone on a pool table, to walk in a field of gold with your lover while a stream sings, the sun sets in a scarlet slash and you both cry at the perfection of the moment, to drive around late at night swigging from a bourbon bottle and look to your left and right and fully love the people sat there, and if you’re not afraid to celebrate these things then The Doors are the perfect soundtrack. And if you don’t know about any of these moments, then The Doors can help you to guess what they might feel like, and who knows, get you to live just a little bit.

I love the bombast and stupidity of the lyrics because for every miss, Jim will pull off a huge hit "cancel my subscription to the resurrection" – haha, it means nothing but at the same time it’s loaded up to sound like it means everything, and I love the sheer balls it took to strike that pose and the idea that you can take that phrase, and others like it, a long way if you want to, and think you can get away with it.

I love that Morrison wanted to push his audience and challenge them, and get them in some small way to think. Although he could be an asshole up on stage, he could also be a raging Bacchus, urging his followers to love and be loved, begging them to question and not to accept blindly, pushing them towards experience and experimentation on every level, as behind him the band produce a sonic cacophony to literally blow the doors off the mind.

The staggering, leering figure of Morrison up there is like some sinister blend of dada, drugs, and murder one moment, sunshine, brotherly love and freedom the next. It’s about abandon, release, charge, the primordial roar of man unshackled and then its about driving with your girl and a beer and not giving a fuck because it really doesn’t get any better than being here right now. Every single moment is experience, and leads to more experience, and if you don’t wake up and realise that, your life is gonna slide by – The Doors were sounding the wake-up call.

I love the barrage of imagery that Morrison pulls out the hat; his words are shot through with half truths, lies, boasts, beliefs, dreams and visions, hallucinations and insights all of which fuse into one another in a hazy half awake state somewhere between now and forever. "Let’s swim to the moon uh huh, let’s climb thru the tide, surrender to the waiting worlds that lap against our side," "Lazy diamonds, studded flunkeys," "I found an island in your arms, a country in your eyes, arms that chain, eyes that lie...Break on through to the other side…" prise apart the deluge of faces and signs that clog Morrison’s words and you’ll find gems.

Personally, I like the Doors best when they are staring into the void. That usually comes over best on the live recording where Morrison goads and whips the band into a frenzy of peaks and troughs, all the while exhorting and cursing at the crowd, bringing down a miasma of delight, decadence, awe and escape. ‘The End’, for example, is just an unbelievable dive into the black, a cold glimpse of the place of no return, whatever the hell that may mean to each of us. ‘Riders on the Storm’ is a delicate farewell perhaps, certainly it’s deliberate in its fragility and nihilism, the fluttering Rhodes picking out the intricacies of the melody like the drops of rain that fall in the background. Clearly ‘People Are Strange’ with that warped honky piano is like a jaunty pop ditty nailed backwards and suffused with the nightmare of loneliness. The Doors catalogue is littered with songs that touch upon the frailty and fear or trying to live, I guess. Morrison sometimes celebrates it and gives in to being a messed up man, but sometimes he really stares at himself and the soundtrack that he and the band come up with to communicate those moments of doubt, fear and anxiety is irresistible.

Of course, musically, you can pick them apart and see just why they are so good: Manzarek on the organ is a fucking lunatic, I mean the guy can play. Besides helping to wheel the Hammond out of the Bingo hall and into the musical canon and ignoring his technical skill (playing those relentlessly loping bass parts with his feet you mean while his solos go into overdrive), his nous for hitting the right note in the right place is uncanny. His flourishes and builds adorn the songs like sparkling vines, the trills and loops twisting around Morrison’s vocal lines and bringing the best out of that sleepless growl.

Krieger on the six strings is one of the most modest guitarists in the canon. He has the ability to drop your jaw when he wants to (see the solo from ‘When The Music’s Over’) but most of the time his slides and licks are the wallpaper while Manzarek and Morrison rip the room to pieces. He’s an atmospheric player but underneath the psych he’s actually really rootsy, a bluesman with a diamond cut edge.

Densmore, the drummer, is all over everything with little jazz flicks and splashes. Like Krieger he’s never intrusive, and once you start really listening out for what he’s up to, his calibre emerges. He plays slightly behind, letting the band swing to their blues tendencies although when it comes to the hammering builds, Densmore is always there to bring the crescendo’s in washing over like a black tide with repeated series of stupid rolls.

Do me a favour and put ‘When The Music’s Over’ on some time. It’s got to be loud to the point where you are prepared not to give a fuck if your neighbour stroke partner stroke cat is gonna get their hackles up. If you start from that perspective, you’re in a much better position to begin to understand just why The Doors are such geniuses. In whatever measure you want to take it, it’s about the thrill, the chill, the buzz of the senses – it’s about living and being. Just try not to think about the smell of leather trousers.

Ha. I just read all that through. It’s a bit full on huh. Well, that’s The Doors though. Full on. And when I’m in the right mood, they really do hit the fucking spot.

Alex K (Alex K), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I always find it funny that [...] devout believers in "Forever Changes" slags off The Doors. It happens, but I don't understand the reasoning, as it is pretty much the same kind of thing.
A bit of history:
Elektra came courting Love. Love insisted that they would only sign to Elektra if the signed their "sister band" the Doors as well.
The Love fans who lack perception find it painful to think that their pet band languished in obscurity while a band hanging on their coat-tails became mainstream superhuge.
It all boils down to jealousy.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

(xpost from before Alex K's passionate manifesto)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

No, you're wrong.

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, which one of us? Me or Alex K?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

hey - I know I'm not wrong bro. Must be you.

Alex K (Alex K), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Yea, not Alex K.

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

what put the influence of The Doors into sharp relief was the excellent interview Alan Cummings did with Keiji Haino back in Halana. He goes into great detail talking about how Jimbo introduced the idea of shaman to rock, channeling spirits (in leather pants, natch). pretty funny to think of him fathering Japanese rock...

abeta, Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

oh dear :(

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Bruce McCulloch of Kid's In the Hall's "Door's Fan" skit gets to similar conclusion as Alex's post.

earlnash, Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Jon Williams...the Elektra/Love story is confirmably true. I've read three oh-so-slightly different versions of the story in 3 different books, and a Mojo article.
It can't be a complete myth or someone would've started complaining that it wasn't true by now.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's a slightly less detailed version courtesy of Brinkster

Morrison was now established as the vocalist and the quartet began rehearsing in earnest. The Doors' first residency was at the London Fog on Sunset Strip, but they later found favour at the prestigious Whisky-A-Go-Go. They were, however, fired from the latter establishment, following a performance of 'The End', Morrison's chilling, oedipal composition. Improvised and partly spoken over a raga/rock framework, it proved too controversial for timid club owners, but the group's standing within the music fraternity grew. Local rivals Love, already signed to Elektra Records, recommended the Doors to the label's managing director, Jac Holzman who, despite initial caution, signed the group in 1966.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Doors by Bruce McCulloch & Kevin Macdonald

Hey man, listen up. I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. You know that new Depeche Mode album? It sucks. You know what? That new Cure album? It sucks. That new Happy Mondays album? I don't know if there is one, but if there is, it sucks. I can say this 'cause I know. 'Cause I'm a Doors fan. And you know, if you want to be a Doors fan, you know what? You might already be one, and you don't even know it. You know, sort of like being gay, you're walking around, you know something's up, you just don't know what it is. You see, Doors fans aren't made, they're born. I'll bet right now, in Africa, there's some guy madely beatin' on a drum; he's one. Or an old lady on a bus, suckin' humbugs; she's a Rider on The Storm, and she don't even know it. I do... 'Cause I'm a Doors fan.

And if you want to be a Doors fan, don't just go buy a greatest hits album. Greatest Hits albums are for housewives and little girls. You want to be a Doors fan, you gotta do it right. It's very scientific. You gotta buy Waiting For The Sun. It's their third album, but really it's their first. We call it the departure point.

Okay, Quick quiz: Who's on bass? No bass. That's right. The Doors had no bass. You see, the gypsies ad no homes. Don't let that scare you, let that free you. Let that liberate you. 'Cause when you're free-flying with the Doors, man, you don't need no safety net. If you scream, "Viva la Doors!" loud enough for your landlord to start thumpin' on the walls, then you might in fact be a Doors fan.

There's one way to know for absolute sure. Get an eight-track tape of LA Woman -there's only a few in existence- and steal a car. Even if you own one, steal a car. Get in that car, play the tape, full blast, and drive West. When the tape ends, get out, and go to the nearest bar, and start to play pool, or pinbball, or possibly even foosball, and wait to get into a fight. Afterwards, get back into that car, and drive till it runs out of gas. Then, torch it. And if, as you're standing there, watching those flames, if you can still hear the Doors sound, you will have become a Doors fan. You wanna know how I know? You wanna know who told me? Well, last year, Jim fuckin' Morrisson told me, that's who. He came to me, 'cause I'm a Doors fan. I'm a Doors fan, man... man, I love their sound. I like the Doors.

earlnash, Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's another version courtesy of Bryan Maclean

For a long time there was a theory that Lee had taken umbrage at the supposed favouritism displayed by Elektra towards labelmates The Doors. (As late as 1993 Lee was grouching to the Los Angeles Times that ‘[Elektra] used tie money they made off us to promote The Doors and make them Number 1".) The irony here is that it was Lee who urged Jac Holzman to see The Doors playing at the Whisky; and who even persuaded the Elektra boss to check them out again after he -like many record executives in Hollywood at the time - was left unimpressed by Jim Morrison’s heavy-handed stage act.

(xpost)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I misread Jac Holzman as Jaz Coleman


DAMN YOU ILX!!!

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

"I’m not sure that attempting to interrogate the music via sober de riguer phraseology and critique will get to the heart of what this band is about for me."

Alex K I'm sorry, I stopped reading after that. It seemed like the right thing to do?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 12 June 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

earlnash: So, where in that sketch does Heckubus show up?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 12 June 2003 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, Krieger did play electric bass on many (most?) of their
songs.

squirl plise, Thursday, 12 June 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I love, love the 'In Concert' live collection. For some reason I haven't felt compelled to get any of the studio albums, and when I hear them they don't seem to have the same charge and crispness of that live stuff.

It really shows how much they breathed as a group, I love the dynamics and ability to open up their songs (not just to turn them into jams, although they do that too, but to include the vocals as a leading improvisational instrument).

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 12 June 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)

doors in shock nu-ilm critical rehabilitation:who'd have thunk it

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)

seriously though,i've been kind of dismissive of the doors for ages,but thinking about them now,which i haven't done in ages,they were a great pop group,and while being well into the doors doesn't really appeal,i like the idea of putting them on really loud every so often
i suspected the doors were better than i thought about a year ago when i saw a live video of roadhouse blues which had an incredible energy,but i kind of forgot about them again after that...
i think a lot of people's reasons for disliking them (mine included)is a lot to do with embarrasment over their image-they're easy to dismiss as pretentious over the top bombast for 16 years old smoking their first joint,but that's an easy way out and nothing to do with the music-i don't let the image get in my when when it comes to listening to gangsta rap,so why should i with the doors
i must give them another chance,i've put on morrison hotel which i never really got into even when i did like them,i'll see what i think

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

taking sides-
dismissing the doors out of hand for being pretentious over the top music for kids
vs
dismissing abba out of hand for being disposable fluffy pop for drunken secretaries,wedding bands and kids

at the end of the day is it possible that they're both just good pop bands,and people let image get in the way?

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

throw me in with the decent-pop-group-trapped-under-"poetic dark side"-hype-and-pretension pack.

Though "Touch Me" remains hilarious.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

the thing is the Doors aren't JUST a good pop band, they're also an insufferable avant-poet improv mishmash fart machine. Neither element should be ignored.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

oh jesus maybe i spoke too soon,waiting for the sun is so fucking shit

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm sorry i think this might actually be too ridiculous
is the house record label peacefrog named after this song?

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)

ok so maybe morrison hotel wasn't the best album to test my theory that the doors are actually a great pop band that everyone's embarrassed to like on

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Take off those leather pants
You can't go out like that
You really don't look phat
I can't be seen with a man wearing leather pants

ron (ron), Friday, 13 June 2003 00:49 (twenty-two years ago)

man we're seeing the seesaw effect here = people coming to the defense of maligned band with serious hyberbole. they were ok. the oliver stone film is sheer horror.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 05:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i kinda take issue to the characterization of jim morrison as being "humorless" upthread. he actually did have a sense of humor -- i mean, doing the whole "lizard king" schtick when yer a fat, smelly and obnoxious drunk (as opposed to when he was a svelte "poet")? the stories of him doing tarzan (and slamming into a wall, as if to underline the very cartoonishness of his entire schtick)? tell me there's no humor in that (or in morrison's entire fat, smelly and obnoxious drunk phase period).

the oliver stone portrayal of him made him seem humorless, though.

Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

"indian summer" and "i can't see your face in my mind" are both, beautiful, understated songs.

cameron, Friday, 13 June 2003 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

funny how oliver stone seems to do that to, um, everything.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i like "indian summer" thats about it.

Chris V. (Chris V), Friday, 13 June 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

defensible (but unlistenable) because without them you would have no julian cope or echo and the bunnymen. hell, julian even wore leather pants.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, but on that logic, destroy them for this reason alone: they inspired the bloody Stranglers!

kate (kate), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Alex K's post. You do have to lose yourself in them for it to make sense.

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(the music, not Alex's post)

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I forgot about "Doors Fan". Oh my gawd I loved that track so.

I just dug Waiting for the Sun out of my stacks of vinyl and listened to it way loud last night. I forgot how much of a visceral reaction this band's music could pull out of me. Good shit, me says.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
Reviving...

I always thought that Densmore was 90% of what I liked about the Doors and even though he's still a dorky hippie in this article I find his outlook here refreshing...

Bob Dylan is singing "The Times They Are A-Changin' " in a television ad for healthcare giant Kaiser Permanente these days, and who could argue? With Led Zeppelin pitching Cadillacs, the Rolling Stones strutting in an Ameriquest Mortgage ad and Paul McCartney warbling for Fidelity Investments, it's clear that the old counterculture heroes of classic rock are now firmly entrenched as the house band of corporate America.

That only makes the case of John Densmore all the more intriguing.

Once, back when rock 'n' roll still seemed dangerous, Densmore was the drummer for the Doors, the band with dark hits such as "Light My Fire" and "People Are Strange." That band more or less went into the grave with lead singer Jim Morrison in 1971, but, like all top classic-rock franchises, it now has the chance to exploit a lucrative afterlife in television commercials. Offers keep coming in, such as the $15 million dangled by Cadillac last year to lease the song "Break On Through (to the Other Side)" to hawk its luxury SUVs.

To the surprise of the corporation and the chagrin of his former bandmates, Densmore vetoed the idea. He said he did the same when Apple Computer called with a $4-million offer, and every time "some deodorant company wants to use 'Light My Fire.' "

The reason? Prepare to get a lump in your throat — or to roll your eyes.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

Apparently, the jackass doesn't get that people like to hear their old favorite songs again to remind them of those times. Rarely do people yell "sell out" when a song comes on an ad because nobody pays attention to holds the rights and people expect it, anyway. For old rockers, it gives them a chance to hear their tunes again instead of some "new crap" that the kids like, while at the same time making them feel young and clued in still because their music is still popular enough to be in ads. The older folks I know might still really like the Doors, but they just about never listen to it. Hearing it in an ad might encourage them to go out and buy the CD so they can play it in their car and live it all over again.

Guitarzan, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Here's everything you need to know about the Doors:

Great pop singles band

Shitty art rock band

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

Good for him. Ray Manzarek is such an ass.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes the Reigning Sound really sounds like the Doors.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

Manzerek is a world class douchebag. Hall of fame caliber.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

jim morrison is one of the best examples of how a person can give their whole self to the music, not thinking about anything else...
he believed in what he was doing, trully believed in all that he was singing about, no matter how 'bad' their music was or how crap his voice was or whatever...
he was living his music and lyrics, and when it was time for his belief to die, he passed with it, cuz otherwise his life would've lost it's meaning

where's the devotion like this today? the sincerety like this?

nique (nique), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

he was living his music and lyrics, and when it was time for his belief to die, he passed with it, cuz otherwise his life would've lost it's meaning

he died cuz he was a fat fucking junkie and alcoholic...everything i've read about morrisson was that he was pretty "devoted" to being a total asshole.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

Here's everything you need to know about the Doors:
Great pop singles band

Shitty art rock band

-- M@tt He1geson (matt@game[remove]informer.com), October 5th, 2005.

Yeah, I don't agree. Where's the dividing line? Is "The Crystal Ship" shitty art rock or good pop singles music? Or any number of songs from the second album, for that matter? What about "Light My Fire" at almost seven minutes - shitty art rock?

"When the Music's Over" is my favorite of their long tracks. It's great.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

It's amazing, really, that this thread even exists. What are parts two and three? Defend the indefensible: the Rolling Stones and the Velvet Underground?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

I dunno...I guess we just like different things about the Doors..I only like the single edit of LIght My Fire, with out Manzerek's keyboard solo....I like all their 3-4 catchy 'choons....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

Three or four!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

i meant 3-4 MINUTE..sorry

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

the whole double CD doors greatest that people have in college in good stuff mostly....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

yeah, what an outrage, there are ppl who don't like the doors! what's next, "defend the indefensible: wings"??

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

handy fact: scornful of the doors=music snob

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

yeah, what an outrage, there are ppl who don't like the doors! what's next, "defend the indefensible: wings"??
-- J.D. (aubade8...), October 6th, 2005.

I'm not "outraged" by it. I just find it interesting that it seems so natural to see a thread like this on ILM - a popular thread, at that - and yet you wouldn't expect the same thing for the Stones or the VU.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

yeah, what an outrage, someone raises the question of why, amongst classic rock bands, the doors get so much hate!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 6 October 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

if you'd lived prior to the 60's (not that i have) you'd realize that there wasn't anything like the doors' sound and performance before then (now i'll have folks who've lived prior to the 60's tell me otherwise, but i'm still right). who cares if now he seems silly and the poetry was bad (which it really wasn't). back then his femminine yet cocky swerve and all that brooding and psychadelia was taken really seriously-by him and everyone else. ILM takes things out of context and deconstructs and is left with nothing. but duran duran are really an amazing band (not that i think they're bad).

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Thursday, 6 October 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

also, jim morrison is one of the few people who actually looks at home in leather pants.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Thursday, 6 October 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

If the Doors flopped and Radioactive re-released that shit as $25-a-pop obscure psych then folks would be creaming there pants.

Sure, Morrison was a douche bag but he had a serious set of pipes and he wrote some fantastic rock 'n' roll poetry.

Manzarek is a dickweed but he came up with some hypnotic, droning, meandering but always rhythmic organ parts.

Fuck, I can't even explaint myself on this one. The Doors rule.

Justin Farrar (Justin Farrar), Thursday, 6 October 2005 03:45 (twenty years ago)

If the Doors flopped and Radioactive re-released that shit as $25-a-pop obscure psych then folks would be creaming there pants.

OTM. Morrison alone is classic for spawning Iggy & Keiji Haino.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 6 October 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)

five years pass...

picked up my first three Doors albums (s/t, Strange Days, and L.A. Woman), and I think 80% of the people in this thread are crazy.

I bet if they came out now everybody would be championing their cause.

lolford brimley (Neanderthal), Monday, 30 May 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.