make predictions about what will be in/win magazines' end of year polls - 2003...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
it's been suggested that i set up a new thread for this, rather than reviving the old one...i'm too tired to make any predictions myself, i'll do it tomorrow. any insider info from people working in mags/newspapers is welcome...

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned Raggett Reads the Almanac

A Disinterested Observer (Ned), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

white stripes, radiohead, outkast.

usual suspects.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"Move Your Feet." Definitely "Move Your Feet."

And the OutKast record. That'll probably win the album of the year Grammy.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

don't agree with the choices: but this is the collated scoring at Metacritic at the mo:

Metacritic - Top 20 Albums 2003
http://www.metacritic.com/music/bests/2003.shtml

DJ Martian (djmartian), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Luomo record out of their systems, but I imagine we'll see that showing up in publications that read ILM to stay hip.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)


This is how Fast'n'Bulbous sees 2003 at the mo:
http://www.fastnbulbous.com/rock.htm

2003
10-

Radiohead * Hail To The Thief (Capitol)
The Mars Volta * De-Loused In The Comatorium (GSL/Universal)
Four Tet * Rounds (Domino)
Cafe Tacvba * Quatro Caminos (MCA)

9+

Yeah Yeah Yeahs * Fever To Tell (Interscope)
Super Furry Animals * Phantom Power (XL/Beggars)
Prefuse 73 * One Word Extinguisher (Warp)
The White Stripes * Elephant (V2)
Broadcast * Hahasound (Warp)
Colder * Again (Output UK)
The Concretes (Licking Fingers Sweden)
Mogwai * Happy Songs For Happy People (Matador)
Ed Harcourt * From Every Sphere (Astralwerks/Heaven)
Joe Henry * Tiny Voices (Anti)
Lucas Santtana * Parada De Lucas (Diginois Brazil)
Josh Rouse * 1972 (Rykodisc)
Wheat * Per Second Per Second . . . Every Second (Sony) Nov 4
The Darkness * Permission To Land (Must Destroy)
The Strokes * Room On Fire (BMG) Oct 21
Lake Trout * Another One Lost (Palm Pictures)
Beulah * Yoko (Velocette)
The Wrens * Meadowlands (Absolutely Kosher)
Manitoba * Up In Flames (Domino)
Belle & Sebastian * Dear Catastrophe Waitress (Sanctuary)
The Ecstasy of Saint Theresa * Slowthinking (Labels UK)
Lightning Bolt * Wonderful Rainbow (Load)
Nina Nastasia * Run To Ruin (Touch And Go)
Outkast * Speakerboxxx/The Love Below (LaFace)
Elbow * Cast Of Thousands (V2)
Zoot Woman (Wall Of Sound)
The Books * Lemon Of Pink (TomLab)
The Coral * Magic And Medicine (Deltasonic)
Calexico * Feast of Wire (Quarterstick)
Calla * Televise (Arena Rock Recording Co)
Terry Hall & Mushtaq * The Hour Of Two Lights (Astralwerks)
The Silver Mt. Zion * This Is Our Punk-Rock (Constellation)
HiM * Many In High Places Are Not Well (Bubble Core)
Firewater * The Man On The Burning Tightrope (Jetset)
Asian Dub Foundation * Enemy of the Enemy (Virgin)

9

Laika * Wherever I Am I Am What Is Missing (Too Pure/Beggars)
The Fire Theft (Rykodisc)
Chris Clark * Empty the Bones of You (Warp)
Magnet * On Your Side (Ultimate Dilemma UK)
The Rapture * Echoes (DFA/Universal) Sep 30
Pleasure Forever * Alter (Sub Pop)
British Sea Power * The Decline Of British Sea Power (Rough Trade)
The Constantines * Shine A Light (Sub Pop)
Rufus Wainwright * Want One (DreamWorks)
Robert Wyatt * Cuckooland (Hannibal)
The Handsome Family * Singing Bones (Carrot Top)
Kevin Blechdom * Bitches Without Britches (EFA)
Isobel Campbell * Amorino (Instinct)
Yo La Tengo * Summer Sun (Matador)
Tricky * Vulnerable (Hollywood)
Joe Strummer and the Mescaleros * Streetcore (Hellcat/Epitaph)
Tied & Tickled Trio * Observing Systems (Morr Music)
Damien Rice * O (Vector)
U.N.K.L.E. * Never, Never Land (Mo' Wax)
A Perfect Circle * Thirteenth Step (Virgin)
The Dirty Three * She Has No Strings, Apollo (Touch And Go)
Scout Niblett * I Am (Secretly Canadian)
Steve Burns * Songs For Dustmites (Pias America)
Clientele * Violet Hour (Merge)
Animal Collective * Here Comes The Indian (Paw Tracks)
Nitin Sawhney * Human (V2)
Ed Motta * Poptical (Trama)
The Natural History * Beat Beat Hearbeat (Startime)
Longwave * The Strangest Things (RCA)
Soft Pink Truth (Matmos) * Do You Party? (Soundslike)
Guided By Voices * Earthquake Glue (Matador)
Elefant * Sunlight Makes Me Paranoid (Kernado)
Willard Grant Conspiracy * Regard The End (Glitterhouse)
Pernice Brothers * Yours, Mine & Ours (Ashmont)
Eleni Mandell * Country For True Lovers (Zedtone)
Janet Bean and the Concertina Wire * Dragging Wonder Lake (Thrill Jockey)
Rancid * Indestructible (Epitaph)
Martina Topley-Bird * Quixotic (Independente)
Matmos * The Civil War (Matador)
The Sleepy Jackson * Lovers (EMI)
Aereogramme * Sleep and Release (Chemikal Underground)
Quasi * Hot Shit! (Sub Pop)
Pram * Dark Island (Merge)
Ui * Answers (Southern)
Cat Power * You Are Free (Matador)
LFO * Sheath (Warp)
Wire * Send (Pink Flag)
Jane's Addiction * Strays (Capitol)
Songs: Ohia * The Magnolia Electric Co. (Secretly Canadian)
The Tyde * Twice (Rough Trade)
Jay Farrar * Terroir Blues (Artemis)
Outrageous Cherry * Supernatural Equinox (Rainbow Quartz)
Joy Zipper * American Whip (13 Amp)
Gorky's Zygotic Mycni * Sleep/Holiday (Mantra/Beggars Banquet)
Beans * Tomorrow Right Now (Warp)
Lucinda Williams * World Without Tears (Lost Highway)
Tindersticks * Waiting For The Moon (Beggars Banquet)
DJ Cheb I Sabbha * As Far As (Six Degrees)
Eels * Shootenanny! (DreamWorks)
The Thrills * So Much For The City (Virgin)
New Pornographers * Electric Version (Matador)
Bardo Pond * On The Eclipse (ATP)
Pretty Girls Make Graves * The New Romance (Matador)
Bent * The Everlasting Blink (Sport)
The Postal Service * Give Up (Sub Pop)
Tangiers * Hot New Spirits (Sonic Unyon)
Nebula * Atomic Ritual (Sub Pop)
Set Fire to Flames * Telegraphs in Negative/Mouths Trapped in Static (Alien8)
Ry Cooder/Manuel Galban * Mambo Sinuendo (Nonesuch/Perro Verde)
Autechre * Draft 7.30 (Warp)

9-

Crooked Fingers * Red Devil Dawn (Merge)
John Cale * Hobosapiens (EMI)
The Dears * No Cities Left (Grenadine)
Death Cab For Cutie * Transalanticism (Barsuk)
Neil Michael Hagerty * The Hex (Drag City)
Erase Errata * At Crystal Palace (Blast First)
Goldfrapp * Black Cherry (Mute)
Ex Models * Zoo Psychology (Frenchkiss)
Natacha Atlas * Something Dangerous (Mantra)
Amy Rigby * Til The Wheels Fall Off (Signature)
David Sylvian * Blemish (Samadhisound)
Athlete * Vehicles & Animals (EMI)
Prince Paul * Politics of the Business (Razor & Tie)
The Kills * Keep On Your Mean Side (Rough Trade)
Atmosphere * Seven's Travels (Epitaph)
Clearlake * Cedars (Domino)
Chris Lee * Cool Rock (Misra)
The Gossip * Movement (Kill Rock Stars)
The Watchers * To The Rooftops (Gern Blandsten)
The Go Betweens * Bright Yellow, Bright Orange (Circus)
Massive Attack * 100th Window (Virgin)
The Sea And Cake * One Bedroom (Thrill Jockey)
Entombed * Inferno (Koch)
Susheela Raman * Love Trap (Narada)]
Subarachnoid Space * Also Rising (Strange Attractors)
Karsh Kale * Liberation (Six Degrees)
Deerhoof * Apple O' (Kill Rock Stars)
Mariza * Fado Curvo (Times Square)
Killing Joke (Pilot)
Tomahawk * Mit Gas (Ipecac)
Dinky * Black Cabaret (Carpark)
Richard Hawley * Lowedges (Setanta)
Mr. Quintron * Are You Ready For An Organ Solo (Three-One-G)
Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds * Nocturama (Mute)
Califone * Quicksand/Cradlesnakes (Thrill Jockey)
Mojave 3 * Spoon And Rafter (4AD)
Iggy Pop * Skull Ring (Virgin)
Whirlwind Heat * Do Rabbits Wonder (V2)
Turnerjoy * Transplant (Mohofusu)
My Morning Jacket * It Still Moves (ATO/RCA)
Black Box Recorder * Passionoia (One Little Indian)
Spiritualized * Amazing Grace (Sanctuary Records)
The Party Of Helicopters * Please Believe It (Velocette)
Thea Gilmore * Avalanche (Compass)
Saturday Looks Good To Me * All Your Summer Songs (Polyvinyl)
Tokyo Sex Destruction * Le Red Soul Comunnitte (10 Points Program) (Dim Mak)
Nataraj XT * Ocean Birds (Nu Tone)
Fruit Bats * Mouthfuls (Sub Pop)
Angels of Light * Everything Is Good Here/Please Come (Young God)
Minus 5 * Down with Wilco (Yep Roc)
Grandaddy * Sumday (V2)
The Decemberists * Her Majesty, The Decemberists (Kill Rock Stars)
Stephen Malkmus & The Jicks * Pig Lib (Matador)
Andrew Bird * Weather Systems EP (Grimsey)
Azita * Enantiodromia (Drag City)
Gang Starr * Ownerz (Virgin)
Buzzcocks (Merge)
Kings Of Leon * Youth And Young Manhood (RCA)
A.R.E. Weapons (Rough Trade)
Smog * Dinner (Drag City)
Drive-By Truckers * Decoration Day (Lost Highway)
Black Rebel Motorcycle Club * Take Them On, On Your Own (Virgin)
Matt Eliott * The Mess We Made (Merge)
Momus * Oskar Tennis Champion (American Patchwork)
Adult. * Anxiety Always (Ersatz Audio)
Throwing Muses (4AD)
Rainer Maria * Long Knives Drawn (Polyvinyl)
Bonnie Prince Billie * Master And Everyone (Palace)
Black Eyes (Dischord)
Cul de Sac * Death To The Sun (Strange Attractors Audio House)
Loose Fur (Drag City)
Audio Bullys * Ego War (Astralwerks)
The Blood Brothers * Burn, Piano Island, Burn (ArtistDirect)
The American Analog Set * Promise of Love (Tiger Style)
The Aislers Set * How I Learned To Write Backwards (Suicide)
Cave In * Antenna (RCA)
Kinski * Airs Above Your Station (Strange Attractors Audio House/Sub Pop)
Evan Dando * Baby I'm Bored (Bar None)
DJ Tiga * DJ Kicks (!K7)
Shipping News * Three-Four (Touch & Go)
Maria McKee * High Dive (Viewfinder)
Blur * Think Tank (Virgin)
Vue * Down For Whatever (RCA)
Sloan * Action Pact (Vik)
Frankie Sparo * Welcome Crummy Mystics (Constellation)
Kristin Hersh * The Grotto (4ad)
Caitlin Cary * I'm Staying Out (Yep Roc)
The Lonesome Organist * Forms & Follies (Thrill Jockey)
Deftones (Maverick)
South * With The Tides (Kinetic)
Jayhawks * Rainy Day Music (Lost Highway)
Ween * Quebec (Sanctuary)
The People Involved (People Involved)
The Cramps * Fiends Of Dope Island (Vengeance)
A.F.I. * Sing The Sorrow (DreamWorks)

DJ Martian (djmartian), Saturday, 1 November 2003 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)

It's looking like X-Ray's album of the year (as voted by its contributors) is going to be...

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drf900/f955/f95558bm0s5.jpg

...which I think is a surprise of the most pleasant variety. Also in the Top 10 is Cat Power - again, goodstuff.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Saturday, 1 November 2003 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Luomo record out of their systems

ha, I assume this isn't coincidental. ;)

scott pl. (scott pl.), Saturday, 1 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

The obvious ones -

Outkast
Basement Jaxx
that Led Zep live album
Radiohead
The New Pornographers
White Stripes
Beyonce

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 1 November 2003 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, and Dizzee Rascal, obviously, though it only really has two great songs and the rest of it is pretty weak.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 1 November 2003 16:07 (twenty-one years ago)

the strokes. everybody's, like, crazy about the new album. it seems that only i don't understand what is so good about it...

frankiez, Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

laika record is ludicrously overpraised by fast'n'bulbous. she's fallen to callahan's level. four tet will be in every top ten.

keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Ott is quickly becoming The Nu Geir

Sonny A. (Keiko), Saturday, 1 November 2003 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The ones mentioned by most people here: White Stripes, Outkast, Four Tet, Calexico, Radiohead, Dizzee Rascal, Super Furry Animals. At least if the Acclaimed Music site has any value as far as summing up 2003 critics faves goes.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Ott is quickly becoming The Nu Geir

Geir has another avatar far more worthy of that distinction.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

It's you, isn't it Ned?

Sonny A. (Keiko), Saturday, 1 November 2003 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

*bows* I've heard stranger. ;-) (But no, not me.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 November 2003 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

http://hem.bredband.net/b132682/2003a.htm

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 1 November 2003 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Radiohead record out of their systems, but I imagine we'll see that showing up in publications that read Pitchfork to stay hip.

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Radiohead
The White Stripes
Outkast
Jay-Z
Basement Jaxx
Dizzee Rascal (I don't like his work. Whatsoever. I don't understand the hype behind him. He'll get the irrational hype, regardless of the banality of ripping off Run-DMC ripping off Billy Squire)
The Strokes

I'd like to see a lot more raving press about Aesop Rock's record, but it seems too angular to be singularly praised.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)

'ned raggett reads the almanac' is HUGE in japan right now

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

what does "too angular to be singularly praised" mean? (also, it's been getting nothing but good press from what I've read, but I haven't read everything, so.)

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

can we instate a one-year ban on the word 'angular'? i'm so tired of hearing it! (goes back to post-punk research)

ps. yo matos!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris Ott hurts my head like a hundred dogs etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Ur not the only 1.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)

ditto etc

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Matos, on an immediate listen, it can be a bit of an awkward record. But on further inspection, it grew on me like few albums before. And when I say singularly praised, I mean, among the underground rap canon, not the indie rock pen prodigal. The general talk on Bazooka Tooth at, say, the Hip Hop Infinity boards is that they downloaded the promo and wrote it off immediately, much like most underground rap heads I've spoken with personally. I'd like to see more propers from the people that would probably, in actuality, enjoy the record most is all.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)

'ned raggett reads the almanac' is HUGE in japan right now

Woohoo! Japanese secret bonus track required!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I totally haven't gotten the Yeah Yeah Yeahs out of my system (hell, just converted a friend to it last night), so I'm hoping for people to still give it props.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

that, Ted Leo, Electric Six, Outkast and Drive-By Truckers. I don't expect Neil Young to get as much but I think he should be up there with 'em too.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

haha since when the fuck does "sampling" equal "ripping off"?!?!

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

When you want to find a reason to be rude about a great track, perhaps?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i could not stand the irrational hype timbaland got for ripping off run-dmc ripping off bob james!!

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean, the absolute gall of the man

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I figure writing Bazookle Toof off with a curt "Slug likes him some girls" "no no, more Labor Days pls" is a bit hasty. But I've been listening to it for the past two months and great moments aside ("We're Famous" = MURDER MURDER; "11:35" = Aes' best storytelling ever and Mr. Lif being his usual slick self; "Babies With Guns" = super-fresh hip-hop quotables aplenty), it feels a bit cramped in that "oh shit my last album blew up for the people I wanted it to blow up for -- now what?" sense. I watched the interview segment with him on the Revenge of the Robots DVD where he talked about how the end of '01 was a peak as far as his depression/agoraphobia/neuroses went, and he posted a severe "fuck allayall" message to the aforementioned HHI hataz. He seems a bit into God Loves Ugly-style bristle mode, which hopefully means that he'll get the pressure off his shoulders shortly afterwards and settle down and make his fucking masterpiece in another year. Only Bazooka Tooth > God Loves Ugly.

Actually, the real sticking point is the whole "no no, El only produced one track, I did the first six, and it is just a coincidence that I, too, chose the path of drunken horns and Vangelis Blade Runner synths" sound. I mean, when the beats work, then great, and I like how all the Jukies hang out in the same brownstone indie-rap bunker and learn from each other and swap ideas and shit, but if this is the first sign of a "signature label sound" that will eventually become Neptunian in its exhaustion then oh no oh shit.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:30 (twenty-one years ago)

(Still, they're better than Esoteric, ha)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

but isn't all praise of individual album singular? I'm still confused by the wording there.

M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Junior Senior will pop up somewhere on the polls. I'm betting that Entertainment Weekly will give it some love.

Jonathan (Jonathan), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I heard that "Shake Your Coconuts" will wind up in that new awful-looking Looney Tunes-cavort-with-live-action-people movie. That seems like a mixed blessing.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

anything that gets Junior Senior closer to their inevitable C-C-Can't Stop The Music movie is inherently good.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe he meant singled out for praise.(and stop editing, matos! it's saturday nite. put yer feet up. have a drink!)

scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

dude if junior senior made a junior senior movie i would be so there!!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)

junior senior will have to make my top ten. and mebbe even that Luomo album that someone mentioned! see, ilm does keep me hip. thanks again, matos. that long list above makes me feel pretty out of it though. of the stuff on their full list i think i've heard 9 out of 284! do you think it would be alright if i just pretended like all the stuff i haven't heard is really terrible? then i wouldn't feel so bad about being slow and making Katatonia my number one album for, like, 3 years in a row. and my number 2 is definitely the Groovski album and that one came out last year. ah well, it's only november.

Geeta, how do you feel about banning the terms "chamber-pop" and "Beach Boys" for a year?

scott seward, Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:15 (twenty-one years ago)

sure thing!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim Finney knows who I am. I know not who Tim Finney is.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

That's probably because he's an incredible writer.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

With ideas.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

And ears.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

And taste. (cf. click)

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)

ILM in self-reinforcement hivemind shocka. (cf. yawn)

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago)

strongo, I'm a fan of sampling. I make beats, I sample all the time. But I do have a problem with using the same idea twice. How is it okay for Dizzee Rascal to take the same sample that Run-DMC used and do effectively the same thing, when you'd probably villify Puffy for doing the same, repeatedly? Does that mean it's cool for me to sample The People's Choice "I Likes To Do It" and call my song "The Wet Set" as opposed to De La Soul's "Tread Water"? That's my point. I have no issue with sampling. It's just when it's done in such an uncreative manner.

nate, your subliminal diss was funny. But your point is pretty good. I also see the obvious influence of El-P on Aesop Rock's sound. I just feel as if there's enough of a tilt to it to legitimize it. If anything, he's borrowing from his partner in crime, Blockhead, more. And for the record, I hated Labor Days.

matos, I'm just trying to say that the album isn't getting as much praise as I expected it to get and that the people who would probably like it best if they gave it a chance, are avoiding it like the plague. I stated it poorly before.

Tim, rude? Wow, are you just hurt by the fact that I insulted the new sound of Britain or something? I don't understand why he's supposed to be Jumping Jack Jesus and why his album is so acclaimed. After what I've said about sampling, legitimize the greatness of the beat of "Fix Up, Look Sharp"? If it's okay to sample, period, is it okay to use the same sample the same way as someone else?

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I have no issue with sampling. It's just when it's done in such an uncreative manner.

Which is my feeling re: "Work It"; I was swarmed on ILM for stating it, but what's the fucking point of playing an old record in the middle of yours. "OH SHIT I KNOW THAT!" Appropriation/nostalgia/respect...what-fucking-ever. How about some creativity, it's supposed to be an art form.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris, it's a ten second snippet. How uptight ARE you?

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Clearlake, Books, Handsome Family, Calexico, Quasi, Metric, Crooked Fingers, Kaito, Russian Futurists, Califone, White Stripes, American Death Ray, New Pornographers, Holly Golightly, Four Tet, Outkast, Janet Bean, etc.

Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I just meant rude as in "negative".

"How is it okay for Dizzee Rascal to take the same sample that Run-DMC used and do effectively the same thing, when you'd probably villify Puffy for doing the same, repeatedly?"

I can't speak for Jess but I suspect he'd agree with me when I say that I wouldn't have a problem with Puffy doing the same thing. Often when Puffy *does* do the same thing (or something very similar) it works brilliantly; sometimes it sounds shit. The determinative factor is not the obviousness of the sample or its prior use.

As for Dizzee, you're totally taking this one song out of context and making it representative for Dizzee's craft as a whole. All the other tracks on Boy in da Corner are self-produced and don't like they rely on much sampling at all (except the occasional Playstation game noise maybe). The fact that "Fix Up Look Sharp" deliberately uses a familiar sampled beat and nothing else suggests that it's very deliberately trying to do and be something else; that "something" is two-fold, I think:

1. it's a demonstration of Dizzee's talent for freestyling over the beat, for being a raucous MC with no concerns about production/songcraft. The point of garage MCing is to ride other people's beats, to take them and make them your own. The backstory behind "Fix Up Look Sharp" is that Dizzee was in the studio, heard someone playing the instrumental break, and just started freestyling over it. If anything, the beat having a lineage and tradition makes it more ideal, because the assfuck-recontextualisation by the MC is consequently more radical and impressive.Oh, and see also: Jamaican riddim culture. And then see also: the eternally piratical nature of sampling throughout the hardcore continuum (hardcore--> jungle--> garage--> grime)

2. "Fix Up Look Sharp" is an old-skool beat in an album full of new-school beats. It's a very deliberate attempt by Dizzee to show that he's not "just" garage, but at the same time it's something of a very enjoyable novelty. Dizzee doesn't take the tradition of hip hop beatcraft seriously a la Jurassic 5 or DJ Shadow-style producers because he's working in a genre that is more forward-looking than tradition-venerating. For that reason, the sole purpose of the tune's old-skoolizm is to announce itself as old-skool. And it's much more effective to use an actual old-skool beat that is vaguely recognisable than it is to find something new and obscure. As I said in relation to Missy's Under Construction album (which has a fairly similar attitude to old-skool as "Fix Up Look Sharp" does), if you're going to an Eighties Revival costume party, you don't go as some obscure indie icon no-one but yourself will be aware of; you go as Cyndi Lauper or Madonna or Prince. This is about the past as fun, as shared history, rather than the past as a chessboard for beatmining fetishists.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"How about some creativity, it's supposed to be an art form. "

Oh my god I bet you'd be the most boring DJ in the history of existence!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

look out, Tim's on fire!

(i heart tim finney)

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"The history of existence." Check minus. Tim, I've gotten people so wound up they were thrown out of the club. I'm talking about music, not dancing; creativity vs. appeasement. I can appreciate both, but don't call one the other.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:37 (twenty-one years ago)

"Tim, I've gotten people so wound up they were thrown out of the club."

Yeah I'd be pretty angry too if I had to listen to you play "Chris Ott's History of the Best and Most Obscure Breaks Ever!!!"

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm talking about music, not dancing; creativity vs. appeasement.

Chris: if hard pressed, could you locate your own genitals? With a map?

(This is another way of asking if you hate fun.)

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm talking about music, not dancing; creativity vs. appeasement.

When you talk about music, you talk about the totality: the emotional, intellectual, cognitive, physical. Not to mention that music isn't heard in a vacuum; it's heard in a variety of different places, etc -- in your bedroom, in dance clubs, at the grocery store. You hear music in a variety of states of mind, too -- When you're sad, when you're happy, when you're angry, or indifferent. So to divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense, just like divorcing music from quarter notes and eighth notes doesn't make sense.

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

"So to divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense, just like divorcing music from quarter notes and eighth notes doesn't make sense."

Yes exactly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Interestingly, recent scientific studies have shown that certain types of music actually provokes muscles around your ankles, elbows, knees, etc to twitch --> dancing! Music creates a physiological response that can be measured; the act of processing music is the job of our bodies as much as it is of our minds. (I can give you a whole list of abstracts to read on the subject if you'd like; I'm doing some freelance work on a public television documentary on music and the brain.)

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)

mark's bit about fear of body middles springs to mind

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"To divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense."

Yes, exactly. Low and Basement Jaxx are interchangeable.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:51 (twenty-one years ago)

so music is anything that's interchangeable with low?!?!

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

ally's bit about crazy pills springs to mind

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry, "types" --> "provoke" not "provokes"! it's late

Re: Low vs Basement Jaxx, I don't get what you're getting at.

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually Chris surely one of the ways we can think about Low's music is to ask, "If not dancing, what physical response does this music provoke? And how is it different to Basement Jaxx in terms of its physical effect?'

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I'm surprised you can actually type your thoughts on the keyboard what with that massive Cartesian split you've got going there.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Band 1: Powerful sleeping pill.
Band 2: Obnoxious alarm clock.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:04 (twenty-one years ago)

You've just neutralized your own argument, Chris!

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)

The mistake is concretizing "danceability" into a definite property rather than a tendency that is present in varying (and ocasionally indectable) amounts in all music. Even my depiction just then is wrong because it suggests you can somehow quantify the amount of danceability of any given music; styles of music which often seem impossible to dance to from an outsider's perspective (gabba, drum & bass etc.) would suggest that it's actually about a level of compatability between the music and the dancer's body. ie. danceability is not a property, but praxis, something we do. It's like there's a hermeneutic horizon where the technical properties of the music mesh with the dancer's ability to interpret those properties physically.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Creativity works in the same fashion of course, which is the fundamental reason why segratating them into separate (and mutually antagonistic or exclusive) properties is a mistake - because they are merely different articulations of the same relationship between the audience (the listener/dancer) and the music.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

NP: Negativland, "Announcement"

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Same thing happens on her new single "Pass That Dutch". Timbo 're-interpolates' "Potholes In My Lawn" by De La Soul.

Formulaic.

Tim, so basically, you're saying it's cool for Dizzee to be uncreative because his uncreativity is so incredibly uncreative that it borders on an unforeseen level of uber-innovation? Stop dressing up the situation. I don't see it as some kind of beautiful reinvention either. I can't see a lot of emcees getting away with this, but because he's a more introspective, junglist emcee, because it's 'his environment', he gets away with it? It's the same thing as every rapper making new songs over "Paul Revere", it's just lazy. And should I feel better about it because he doesn't really care about the beats he's making?

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)

NP: BAD, "Rush"

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Rollie I think you deliberately misread every sentence in my post.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:39 (twenty-one years ago)

'Pass that Dutch' and 'Potholes in my Lawn' sound nothing alike. What sample is it?

bnw (bnw), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

The bit when she says "If you's a fat one put your clothes back on before you start puttin' potholes in my lawn"

Rollie's applying a mentalist strict approach to sample creativity - Missy's not even allowed to reference De La Soul.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought he was talking about regurgitation rather than reference. I was, at any rate.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris, this is what I said to you when you first brought up this argument:

"But Chris I still think you're missing the point. The use of recognisable samples in Under Construction is not the result of Missy and Timbaland wanting to make music like they used to dance to and going to the most obvious records on their shelves. Rather, they're deliberately chosen to trigger the most frequent recognition for the most number of listeners in order to make a point about the specific nature of Missy and Timbaland's nostalgia - a nostalgia which is repeatedly explained to be not theirs alone, but a collective nostalgia. Collective nostalgia by its very nature revels in the overly familiar, because it gets by on cultural touchstones that "we" can take for granted as having shaped everyone's awareness. That's why heaps of people go to eighties revival nights as Madonna or Cyndi Lauper or Michael Jackson, but no-one goes as the drummer from The Minutemen (so far as I know!) - what's the point?

Likewise, for Missy and Timbaland, using unfamiliar samples would unnecessarily obscure the nature of the album's retro-fetish - it would bog the approach down in an overly loaded understanding of what their eighties hip hop "golden age" actually was, rather than what it felt like to someone like Missy who, strictly speaking, was probably too young to have an incredibly intimate knowledge of the source material. And it's only really the feeling that the duo are trying to evoke - the samples are largely decorative, and often their retro qualities exist in deliberate contrast to still-very-futurist grooves. In contrast most other current "golden age" hip hop shies away from obviousness in samples but boringly champions an aged + authentic approach to groove construction.

Ultimately I think the retro samples on Under Construction are used in a similar manner to the the way pop songs are used on the 2 Many DJs album, which is pushing an idea about pop as much as Missy is pushing an idea about hip hop. As both are essentially "arguments" as much as they are records, it only makes sense that their creators would cite the most recognised and persuasive precedents in support of their position."

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:15 (twenty-one years ago)

At any rate, if Missy and Timbaland weren't doing so much else in their grooves *apart* from sampling old hip hop tracks your argument might hold some weight. As it is, the quote of "Potholes in my Lawn" is unnecessary for the song to work, it's a surplus designed to throw everything else in relief.

While I can't make the exact same argument about "Fix Up Look Sharp", in Dizzee's case the "so much else" is his rapping, which is captivating even without any musical backing - in that sense the entire groove is the "surplus", almost throwaway. So you're half-right in that regard Rollie, except of course that you're totally ignoring the role of Dizzee's rapping. One should regard "throwaway sample backing" as playing the same role as "deliberately simple instrument-playing" in that it has two purposes - one) it's rushy, exciting stuff that operates on an entirely different plane to any boring ideas of "creativity" that you and Chris insist on peddling; and two) its deliberate lack of "craft" in one sense serves to highlight the presence of a totally different sort of craft (Dizzee's capabilities as an MC).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim, you give Missy Elliot far too much credit. You can't talk something into mattering.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:23 (twenty-one years ago)

!!!!

Explain what you mean by "mattering". In what sense does it not "matter"?

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Typical "intellectual listener" problem: thinking the song into a "critical" context beyond what it empirically establishes.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with Tim's take on Missy's stuff, definitely. Hip hop as a genre LYRICALLY is full of that sort of genre/era referential stuff all the time; take the Non-Prophets rec., which is Sage Francis dropping Ice-T lyrical references like its nuthin' - he was a kid when Ice-T was at his peak, its about remembering a different time in hip hop. Of course, N-Pz are doing a different sort of thing than Missy...but no, I don't think missy's getting "far too much credit" at all.

The verdict is still out on Dizzee for me though...my immediate reaction was negative, but it has grown on me. I still don't see whats so great about "I Luv U" though.

ddrake, Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)

"Typical "intellectual listener" problem: thinking the song into a "critical" context beyond what it empirically establishes."

So wait...what exactly DO you think Missy's doing?
I don't see how Tim is overintellectualizing this at all...

ddrake, Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I have no problem with references. It's completely natural for a rapper to reference something in the past of the art, but just like it bothers me when someone re-uses the drum pattern from Audio Two's "Top Billing", it's just pointless to grab a piece of another beat to get your point across. Tim, you seem to be magnifying the purpose of their regurgitation. You make it seem as if it's some big noble restructuring knowledge program when really it's like a big ugly writing block. Your glorification of their lack of creativity is part of the problem, how this kind of recycling gets through the review process.

Still, I see what you say about the purpose of Under Construction. But what's the point of her seemingly taking the same approach with this new album? Or Timbaland with his and Magoo's Under Construction 2 album?

This is a battle of personal preference, it seems. Personally, there's no point to the whole 'retro revival' concept. If I want to hear De La Soul, I'll listen to De La Soul. I don't care if they are trying to make a statement. Their whole music shouldn't be based completely on building upon the past.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Missy is, in the contended case ("Work It") pressing play on one of her favorite records. No more, no less. Chris Rock made "Weird" Al caliber light of this with "Champagne" ages ago, but that's about all rap is good for these days: connecting the dots.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i feel like i've taken the crazy pills and fallen into some alternate horrible universe

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)

" but that's about all rap is good for these days: connecting the dots."

This is pretty ironic, considering that you consider almost all hip hop albums of the 90s to be "full of filler".

And Rollie, the thing is, they AREN'T completely based on building on the past. Timbaland's beats are anything BUT reliant on the past - which is what makes the context of the use of "retro" sampling so cool. If he was doing entirely sample-based production a la Prince Paul, it'd be one thing....

ddrake, Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm too drunk to make anything like a cogent argument to the 56 (!!!) posts which have sprung up since i went out earlier tonight, except:

life's too short to argue with morons.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)

also wherever tim said "i can't speak for jess": you know you can, brohemes.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:51 (twenty-one years ago)

also chris ott getting on timbaland's dick re. "creativity" is ilm laff riot of the year.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:53 (twenty-one years ago)

also...

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:55 (twenty-one years ago)

go to bed, kid. it's where i'm going.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 2 November 2003 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

arguing with morons? i thought that was the point of life.

or maybe just too much of mine.

(chris ott exemplifies old-pfork fear of body to a remarkable extreme -- dance and have fun? i'd rather sleep!) (if this had some bangsian self-loathing w/r/t the utter stupidity of this thrown in it could still make a cool article tho)

also chris Timbo is the main creative force behind Missy production. also do you hate all songs with I V IV after Louie Louie? if you're going to write a new song, why not use a new chord sequence? and all these records use the same instruments! if you're going to write a new song, why not invent new things to play it on?

also rollie, for pfork's "rap dude" (or one of them) how can you hate sampling so much? you do realize this invalidates most "old-school" rap far more than modern stuff, right!? "fuck eric b. and rakim -- they just stole from james brown, maaaan!"

really, what are you, eighty-five years old or something?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:04 (twenty-one years ago)

[xpost jess you forget ott's "if pfork is popular than it MUST BE GOOD" turn of glorious illogic]

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yet of all the ILM boiz, I am the most bling-bling.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)

you're not an ilm boy chris! we never accepted you into the hivemind.

also if you don't rock the bufu you can't claim the bling.

christ, actually please never use that word again! (or at least until you listen to a b.g. or big tymers at the least album IN FULL)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh Sterling come now, you know I haven't listened to anything recorded after 1997.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

True Story, Baby Gangsta (B.G.), 1993

He was spittin fire while you were still wearing training blinders.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll take Warlock Pinchers Sterl; after all, I'm an "intellectual listener".

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 2 November 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the end of year polls will be dominated by HIM and Helloween.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 2 November 2003 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"I'm a fan of sampling. I make beats, I sample all the time. But I do have a problem with using the same idea twice."

I said that earlier, Sterling. Read the thread first. I like sampling. Just when it's done right. My thing is about how it's somehow extra legitimate to sample a really well-known piece over something more obscure for nostalgia's sake. I don't really get that line of thinking. Sampling should be used to bring a new light to music that wouldn't be heard normally, not some sort of nostalgia light tower.

Timbo is one of my favorite producers. In most cases, his forward thinking approach is refreshing. But still, his records with Missy Elliott somehow irk me with a sense of 'let's remind them of this'.

Whatever, this argument lost it's point awhile ago.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Sunday, 2 November 2003 09:40 (twenty-one years ago)

what the fucking fuck. i feel like i can't reply to one thing here without replying to eveything here, which is just tiring. to limit it to the most recent post: sampling shouldn't be about people recognizing what's being sampled??????!!!! nostalgia isn't enough of a 'creatively legitimate' emotion for smart musicians to want to evoke it in some way? sampling a well known bit of music automatically = 'nostalgia'? (which was tim's point, one of them anyway)

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Yum!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)

No, YUM!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)

what'd you think of since i left you, rollie? large chunks of the emotionalism in that record = "let's remind them of this"

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm i'd bet ott and rollie wouldn't think twice about defending a rock song that was thrown together, nasty, hasty, seam-showing, etc., but 'fix up' is this big PROBLEM somehow. well, maybe not, but i'd bet so.

the key is the shock-cut silence between the 'big beat' beats. offends only the virtuous! if that little affront to the Forces of Tasteful Progess gives you a sour-lemonade face then, well, you know which side you're on i guess.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Sunday, 2 November 2003 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

''So to divorce music from dancing doesn't make sense, just like divorcing music from quarter notes and eighth notes doesn't make sense.''

I guess you're talking abt dance music in the 'divorce music from dancing' (though every record creates some kind of psysiological reaction but it may not lead to what we know as dancing): even so, surely its reasonable to make the argument that, as record is released for home consumption (that is one of its functions) (passive listening) then it may not work as that.


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, Julio, but Tim said:

The mistake is concretizing "danceability" into a definite property rather than a tendency that is present in varying (and ocasionally indectable) amounts in all music. Even my depiction just then is wrong because it suggests you can somehow quantify the amount of danceability of any given music; styles of music which often seem impossible to dance to from an outsider's perspective (gabba, drum & bass etc.) would suggest that it's actually about a level of compatability between the music and the dancer's body. ie. danceability is not a property, but praxis, something we do. It's like there's a hermeneutic horizon where the technical properties of the music mesh with the dancer's ability to interpret those properties physically.

I heart Tim and Geeta, btw.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't understand how that para has to do with what i said.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 2 November 2003 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

What bothers me about Under Construction is not so much that it's a nostalgia album in a lot of ways, though of course it is, but that in that nostalgia and self-reflexivity it pulls another skin over the endlessly backward-looking and history-scrambling music of the end of the last century without bothering to contribute too much to the argument.
Know what I mean? A lot of the most exciting music in the last fifteen years or so of the 20th century was, for me, a creative act but also an acknowledgement of the culture of previous generations and the effect it all had on one's perception: understanding that by 1991 all the good melodies had been used up, but through pastiche or cut 'n' paste or whatevs something new could be made of the old. The rap nostalgia of Under C. doesn't contribute too much to the cycle of pop reinvention-- though it could've. We have to assume Timbo doesn't do things by accident, and it's tough to imagine such a whiz would dredge up the formulas of the past for any reason but mass appeal-- especially when he has so much that's new to say.

Shabba (antexit), Sunday, 2 November 2003 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope everyone's gotten that riduculous Radiohead record out of their systems

Why? It is, after all, the best thing they've done since "OK Computer"

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 2 November 2003 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Cuz it's the 'least African', right?

dave q, Sunday, 2 November 2003 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

But Geir, they use drums?!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 2 November 2003 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Julio, I thought you were questioning how "danceability" could be an appropriate criterion, all of the time -- I think what Tim's post suggests is that it's not a question of whether you dance or not, but simply how the music affects you physically, and that this is a useful way to approach any kind of music (not just dance) (perhaps it makes you lie very still, with your eyes closed; this, too, is noteworthy) (whereas Ott doesn't seem as interested in the phenomenological aspects of music).

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 2 November 2003 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

"Know what I mean? A lot of the most exciting music in the last fifteen years or so of the 20th century was, for me, a creative act but also an acknowledgement of the culture of previous generations and the effect it all had on one's perception: understanding that by 1991 all the good melodies had been used up, but through pastiche or cut 'n' paste or whatevs something new could be made of the old. The rap nostalgia of Under C. doesn't contribute too much to the cycle of pop reinvention-- though it could've. We have to assume Timbo doesn't do things by accident, and it's tough to imagine such a whiz would dredge up the formulas of the past for any reason but mass appeal-- especially when he has so much that's new to say."

Here's the thing I don't understand....you guys are acting like he just took the beat from Run DMC (re:I forget the name of the original sample..."take me to the mardi gras"?) and used it flat out...but he didn't. He worked it into the music and incredibly forward thinking beats that he'd already created in a clever and creative way. He's not just biting, he's really using it to great effect. When I hear those drums, I immediately think "Peter Piper," and its a really cool affect. A call of nostalgia that fits Missy's vibe perfectly. I mean, look at her videos; her whole steez is that she's a new millenium b-girl, with style from the 80s plus some sort of futuristic shit goin on.....

ddrake, Sunday, 2 November 2003 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

rollie were people unaware of p-funk until g-funk?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 2 November 2003 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)

"tell the truth, james brown
was old / till eric and rak
did 'i got soul'" --stet

Haikunym (Haikunym), Sunday, 2 November 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

"what'd you think of since i left you, rollie? large chunks of the emotionalism in that record = "let's remind them of this" "

Ha ha Mitch I was thinking of bringing up Since I Left You too (especially the bit with the bassline from "Holiday") but I pheared that it would be a huge invitation for Chris and Rollie to miss the point again.

Rollie's position wrt to sampling is the very essence of Mark S's reformulation of "rockism" - wherein the problem with such a position is that it ultimately undermines the fundamental elements of the style it seeks to defend. Just as rockist approach wrt rock music impliedly casts rock as inferior to classical/jazz etc, Rollie's demand for new/obscure samples adopts the same line of thinking which considers the act of sampling itself to be inherently uncreative; after all, the act of sampling is fundamentally about using bits of music that already exist, both materially and in the memory of music listeners.

As ddrake points out, Timbaland/Missy's new-found love of sampling is a direct corollary to their emphasis on unusual production approaches. Like the other factors which tend to induce a return to sampling (new genre, new technology, new performance style), their old skoolism is all about recontextualising the old within the context of the new. I don't think it's really feasible to maintain that tracks like "Gossip Folks" or "Play That Beat" or even "Bring The Pain" sound the same as the tracks they're referencing.

Obv. we can boil this whole argument down to whether you choose to care about which samples are being used or what's being done with (and against, and around, and alongside) them. In my opinion, discussing Missy entirely in terms of which samples she uses is the equivalent of pointing at someone in the street and saying "Oh my God, did you realise that underneath your clothes you're entirely naked!?!"

"Still, I see what you say about the purpose of Under Construction. But what's the point of her seemingly taking the same approach with this new album? Or Timbaland with his and Magoo's Under Construction 2 album?"

The tracks I've heard from Under Construction 2 seem to run the gamut of Timbaland's styles - Indian, electro-bass etc. Retro is just another style he can throw into the ring. Meanwhile the tracks I've heard from This is not a Test (which is not many, and then only once) don't seem explicitly old-skool so much as deliberately raw and unpolished: lots of enormous farting bass and really chunky beats, it's actually kinda unplaceable, like EPMD meets Public Enemy meets current crunk (and this is ignoring the obvious example of "Pass That Dutch", which stills more from the Diwali riddim than anything else)*. I'm not sure if the point is really "retro" anymore so much as loud, obnoxious club music. I suspect that Missy wants to downplay the production skillzor side of the equation in order to focus attention on her (increasingly surrealistic/silly) MCing, ie. continuing the process that began with "Work It". Certainly she seems to be moving away from the R&B side of things; whereas before she pitched herself between Lil Kim and Aaliyah now she seems to be pitching herself between Fatman Scoop and Busta Rhymes.

* I have to assume that you guys would absolutely detest Ol' Dirty Bastard's "Welcome Home" - that's like fifth-hand pillaging going on!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

When I hear those drums, I immediately think "Peter Piper," and its a really cool affect.

So how about, say, Soho's "Hippy Chick" or Credit To The Nation's "Call It What You Want" then? Smacks of lazy bandwagon-jumping tokenism from where I'm sat.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

what the fucking fuck.

Uh, quite.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but what I really want to kniw is...will lots of people still be enjoying the Manitoba record enough to put it on their lists in a month's time?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)

"So how about, say, Soho's "Hippy Chick" or Credit To The Nation's "Call It What You Want" then? Smacks of lazy bandwagon-jumping tokenism from where I'm sat."

I love "Hippy Chick"! Top tune!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hippychick" DEMOLISHES "How Soon Is Now" easy

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 02:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Speak not this blasphemy in my ears (they're both great).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

they ARE both great. in their own way. it's like comparing abbas with edelweisses.

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The Von Trapp Family / "Dancing Queen" mashup is only a heartbeat away.

Picking up from what Tim was saying, has Missy become a much better MC since 'Miss E', or is it me? The rhymes on 'Work It' and 'Pass That Dutch' are more interesting than 'Get Ur Freak On' by a long shot.

Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

they are, but "Freak" is still the better record

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"Picking up from what Tim was saying, has Missy become a much better MC since 'Miss E', or is it me? The rhymes on 'Work It' and 'Pass That Dutch' are more interesting than 'Get Ur Freak On' by a long shot."

Probably yes - but I agree with Matos that this doesn't necessarily make the records better. Perhaps "Get Ur Freak On" and "Lick Shots" work as great pop records because Missy knew she wasn't a brilliant MC and realised she had to compensate for that in other ways. Like, the problem with "Pass That Dutch" is that Missy evidently thinks she's good enough to get away with releasing a first single without a chorus.

I'll also be really sad if she does abandon R&B, as I possibly prefer her in R&B mode - "Sock It 2 Me", "Sticking Chickens", "We Did It", "One Minute Man", "Play That Beat" etc. etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)

She seems to be merging the two into this weird, slippery sort of rapping style. I would call it sing-song but that doesn't describe it properly, she's not pingponging between notes so much as sliding around wherever she sees fit, while shortening/lengthening emphases and cadences as a rapper. It's so cool. She has improved as an emcee but I would be sad too if she abandoned her singing voice altogether, it's gorgeous.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 3 November 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Belle & Sebastian to be somewhere between #8 and #15 in most places.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hah, I hadn't even noticed that there's really no chorus per se in "Pass the Dutch." There so much happening where the chorus is supposed to be that it sneaks by for me- Missy chanting "pass the dutch," the male voices calling "hoody hoo," various "woo" and "awww"'s going on."

I agree, but the fact that there's no chorus *and* the groove is so tuneless (I don't mean that negatively) mean that it doesn't really stick in the head the way "Work It" or "Get Ur Freak On" did.

I suspect that This Is Not A Test might be the Da Real World to Under Construction's Supa Dupa Fly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Regarding The Avalanches, I only heard "Frontier Psychologist" and slept on the album until it was taken of shelves. I'd imagine I would enjoy the rest.

Tim, I thought ODB's 'Welcome Home' track was kind of uninspired. An obvious rush job, nothing really notable about it. I remember being glad that he still had the delivery going, but that's about it.

g--ff, there's a difference between a rock song being loose and unrestricted and a rap song being sloppily produced. This isn't my main argument.

I'm saying, why can't artists evoke previous musics while still utilizing their own outlets? This is why I feel like Under Construction is a boring nod to the past and something like Paul's Boutique winks at it's forefathers while still remaining almost fully forward-thinking and original.

Saying "Bring The Pain" on Under Construction isn't simply a rehash is strange to me. New lyrics, yes, different mood, yes, but how is it such a forward step? What influence is this giving? As long as I have the original artist on the track, it's cool for me to take the frame of a song. Excuse me while I call Sadat X about jumping punks and beatdowns. We have a hit to make.

Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway: I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"Your choice of sampling is just a personal preference thing anyway. I prefer El-P freaking "Mexican Radio" by Wall of Voodoo for Cannibal Ox over someone building on top of "Paul Revere", regardless of how funky it is or what nostalgia is promotes. I'm not saying such uncreativity is wholly unenjoyable, I'm saying I like other methods more."

Fine, you like other methods more, but your subjective preference doesn't make El-P objectively creative and Timbaland/Missy objectively uncreative.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i.e. your opinion is thoroughly informed by unspoken assumptions as to what constitutes "creativity" that you need to interrogate. Creativity is one of the trickiest concepts to pin down that I can think of; you fling it about as if you've got a reference book that measures out creativity for all musical acts past and present. So your subjective position is false.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)

rollie you unfortunately buy into the idea of "progress" in music and also of GIVING influence. which is i guss a logical extension of the idea of influence at all, hence mark's quip that if it does exist it must run backwards in time!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 November 2003 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with Tim (no surprise there!) Creativity seems to be equal to you liking it, which boils down to personal taste. Which kinda reminds me of that awful Prend3rgast book, in which he christened all the music he ever liked as 'ambient'.

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

oh God Geeta you didn't read that Pendergrast book did you? (I didn't because Douglas's review was so convincingly horrible)

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I've seen it second hand and I want to pick it up but I keep thinking of mark s' review of it in the wire. The one time where I have read a piece of his and thought that he was actually angry.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 3 November 2003 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

haha Matos I skimmed it but never read it closely (thank god). The only good thing to ever come out of that horrible book were the brilliantly scathing reviews of it by douglas and mark

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

didn't see Mark's! you must send me a link sometime.

needless to say, the Sterling-Tim-Geeta front is OTM throughout this thread.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Tim and Geeta have said and will probably continue to say all of my views on this matter...

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

well, somebody's gotta like fun around here, might as well be them

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

radical subjectivism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

*sniff*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Cuz it's the 'least African', right?

Radiohead has never been "African" in any way. But they, like all other bands, are best when they create melodies with verse and chorus, not just a phrase or two that are repeated endlessly. Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.


Geir, this is really, really, really untrue if the listener is me.
Thus, it is untrue.

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

geir, yr posts need more chorus

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

they certainly have enough repetition!

scott seward, Monday, 3 November 2003 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm halfway thru a version of 'come on eileen' with lyrics abt geir instead

i'm really stumbling tho with the 'with you in that dress/my thoughts i confess/verge on dirty' bit

geeta (geeta), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

WTF

pitchfork, Monday, 3 November 2003 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha that rules.
oh man this post sucks, damn it.
no it doesn't. yes.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Repetition and minimalism always bores the listener.

Miles Davis & Beethoven both strongly disagree with this statement.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

These will be in my end of year poll submission to any magazine that asks me:

Dorinne Muraille Mani (Fat Cat)
The Books The Lemon of Pink (Tomlab)
Matmos The Civil War (Matador)
Nathan Michel Dear Bicycle (Tigerbeat 6)
Colleen Everyone alive wants answers (Leaf)
Gal Hinaus:: In den, Wald. (CD-R / radio))
Lullatone Computer Recital (Audio Dregs)
Anne Laplantine Hambourg
Robert Wyatt Cuckooland (Hannibal)
David Sylvian Blemish (Samadhisound)

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The Books The Lemon of Pink (Tomlab)

Can someone please tell me some more about this band? The internet doesn't know shit, but "Motherless Bastard" (I think it's called) is fab.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

see Boomkat review >>> The Books - The Lemon of Pink
http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?merchID=11926

DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, Mark R. has written reviews on Pfork of both their albums, and his enthusiasm was what led me to seek them out.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Christ, they sound like the best band in the world. And "chamberclick" is my new favourite genre!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

momus have you heard the mileece album? i find people who dig the colleen record are generally into that one too

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

No I haven't, will track it down, sounds interesting, thanks for the tip.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.absorb.org/articles/mileece/

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

not at all sampled-oriented (like the colleen record) but still beautiful stuff

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm, slightly disappointed by the clips here. I must say. It's not a fresh enough sound, rather generic electronica, even FSOL-lifeforms-like. Rather 90s. I was hoping there'd be some acoustic instruments mixed in, something like Mamoru Fujieda's 'Patterns of Plants'.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

fair enough. there's nothing at all acoustic about formations. i guess leaf does that kind of thing best in the end..

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

which reminds me: i havent listened to murcof in ages!

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

(/thread hijack)

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.