singles for 2003 vs Pitchfork

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/top/2003/singles/

looks like ilm gets a subtle mention on the number 1 spot .. who can resist such wonders ..

mark e (mark e), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow... not one conventional indie-rock single in the Top 10. That's a pretty dramatic volte-face.

Jason J, Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Veni vidi vici.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

haha

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm, I think that's my cry me a river blurb - brian wilson reference flubbed, mentions or references to xtina, beyonce, pink, britney, jessica and nick, and mandy all gone. I gotta learn to not go well over the word count limit! (hint hint ryan: maybe a director's cut for the book...;) )

I have to admit I'm a bit lost with Brent's Hey Ya blurb myself - "erupt"??

Also, mark's writing kills here - I like the VW/clowns line.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess it's to be expected, but the mixing in of indie singles with real actual mainstream hits is weird to me. I made a rule for myself that for my singles list, I'm only including songs I actually heard on (non-college) radio and/or saw on tv, mainly because i'd feel weird and maybe tokenist about throwing "Where Have All The Rude Boys Gone?" between a bunch of R&B hits. but if you took out or seperated all the indie stuff there, you'd still probably end up with a pretty respectable top 25 pop singles list.

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah what does "erupt bootlegs of Whitney Houston and Kraftwerk" even mean??

it still amazes me that people who have been writing for so long can construct sentences that make no sense, in any language, as a matter of course.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

i'd feel weird and maybe tokenist about throwing "Where Have All The Rude Boys Gone?" between a bunch of R&B hits

That's silly. Did you enjoy "Where Have All The Rude Boys Gone?" enough to include it in your list? Well, put it in there!

I especially mad at Pitchfork about this. I can barely find anything to hate about the list, and that's one of my life's little joys.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I gotta learn to not go well over the word count limit!

Just for the record, on the "Rock Your Body" blurb I didn't actually write JT was an "embarrassment". What I turned in lamented the fact he only had 2 singles in the list!

Call me a homer, but I like the way the list turned out.

dleone (dleone), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

>>> a side note why do Americans [cross ref: Pitchfork and PopMatters] who split lists over several webpages don't also supply a summary list to glance at?


DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

the list is okay! i mean, it looks pretty much like what an "ilm" list would look like, really.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I have to admit it turned out better than I expected - even with Spoon in it. ;) (in all fairness, I've never even heard that song, so...)

Seriously, I think it's a pretty good list, and is representative of both the staff and site. (I wish Ryan would print the bleedin' individual lists for these things, though!)

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

...you should set up a blog then Scott.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a very odd list, but not an altogether bad one. I think the Top 3 is trying too hard. And it's just weird to see Black Dice sandwiched between Jay-Z and Outkast.

Jason J, Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe you're right, Johnny. but I can't help but feel that there's a difference between enjoying a single that reaches you from the mighty hand of pop culture on a daily basis, and a song I probably wouldn't have heard if I didn't happen to be a fan of the band and bought the album (and a song which I don't enjoy significantly more than several other tracks on the album, but just happens to be the single).

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

(martian, I will e-mail you it in proper list form so you don't have to cut and paste)

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

i like the list. has peaked my interest in a few unknown trax and actually reflecs the resurgence if some damn fine Pop Music in last 12 months .. something i would never have admited in 2002.

mark e (mark e), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks, also the albums list please....

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a fine list, no surprise really, once you start taking notice of pop music your singles list gets dominated by it because popular singles often become popular through being very good and by definition they have wide appeal. It's hardly rocket science.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

also now I'm really unsure as to what to do with late 2002 entries like "Cry Me A River" and "What We Do" that I'd kind of already ruled out of my '03 list (even if "Rock Your Body" and "Flipsides" would still place higher, respectively).

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's a summary:

01: Outkast
"Hey Ya!"
02: Beyonce [ft. Jay-Z]
"Crazy in Love"
03: Justin Timberlake
"Cry Me a River"
04: The Rapture
"House of Jealous Lovers"
05: Junior Senior
"Move Your Feet"
06: !!!
"Me and Giuliani Down by the School Yard (A True Story)"
07: Dizzee Rascal
"I Luv U"
08: Kelis
"Milkshake"
09: 50 Cent
"In Da Club"
10: The Roots [ft. Cody Chesnutt]
"The Seed 2.0"
11: The Flaming Lips
"Fight Test"
12: Spoon
"The Way We Get By"
13: Radiohead
"There There"
14: Mu
"Chair Girl / Let's Get Sick"
15: R. Kelly
"Ignition (Remix)"
16: Electric Six
"Danger! High Voltage!"
17: Missy Elliott
"Pass That Dutch"
18: Ted Leo/Pharmacists
"Where Have All the Rude Boys Gone?"
19: The White Stripes
"Seven Nation Army"
20: Manitoba
"Hendrix with Ko"
21: Basement Jaxx [ft. Dizzee Rascal]
"Lucky Star"
22: The Strokes
"12:51"
23: Justin Timberlake
"Rock Your Body"
24: The Darkness
"I Believe in a Thing Called Love"
25: Jay-Z
"La La La (Excuse Me Miss Again)"
26: Black Dice
"Cone Toaster"
27: Outkast
"GhettoMusick"
28: Yeah Yeah Yeahs
"Maps"
29: M83
"Run into Flowers"
30: Sean Paul
"Like Glue"
31: Panjabi MC [ft. Jay-Z]
"Mundian to Bach Ké (Beware of the Boys)"
32: Lil' Kim [ft. Mr. Cheeks]
"The Jump-Off"
33: Tatu
"Not Gonna Get Us"
34: The Postal Service
"The District Sleeps Alone Tonight"
35: Madvillain
"America's Most Blunted"
36: Missy Elliott [ft. Ludacris]
"Gossip Folks"
37: Blur
"Out of Time"
38: Dizzee Rascal
"Fix Up Look Sharp"
39: Killer Mike [ft. Big Boi]
"A.D.I.D.A.S."
40: Delgados
"All You Need Is Hate"
41: Johnny Cash
"Hurt"
42: The Rapture
"Sister Saviour"
43: The Libertines
"Time for Heroes"
44: Manitoba
"Jacknuggeted"
45: Snoop Dogg [ft. Pharrell Williams & Uncle Charlie Watson]
"Beautiful"
46: Freeway [ft. Jay-Z & Beanie Sigel]
"What We Do"
47: Nas
"Made You Look"
48: Nas
"I Can"
49: The Postal Service
"Such Great Heights"
50: Ellen Allien
"Trash Scapes"

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks, also the albums list please....

ok, same time tomorrow

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow... not one conventional indie-rock single in the Top 10. That's a pretty dramatic volte-face.

yeah, it's a dramatic shift from last year's singles list...anyway, !!! and Rapture are indie.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

That's a pretty fucking great list. Here's to Pitchfork!

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

The Rapture are post-punk revivalists NOT Magnet Magazine US trad Indie Rockers

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

That list and this thread make me happy.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe this is the place for this question.
In that "Rock Your Body" song, is JT really singing "I'm gonna pork your body till the brink of day. . .I'm gonna pork you"? Cuz it sounds like that sometimes. And if he is singing that, I can feel better about liking that song.

otto, Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Not a bad list. I'm impressed. But Pitchfork is far more open minded when it comes to their singles coverage, so it's not so much a shocker. It's the albums coverage where their indie-centric conservatism comes through.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I refuse to believe Justin would so violently disenfranchise his Jewish audience.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think singles should be allowed on a list like this unless they've been bona fide hits (ie millions of people have been exposed to them and they've entered the cultural bloodstream), or they are unavailable on an album. Honestly, who gives a crap about a Blur, Postal Service, or Delgados 'single' in this day and age?

Rick Spence (spencerman), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, considering I thought the Postal Service album was shite, but that that single was wonderful, me.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Agreed re: Postal Service. Stinky album, good opening tracks.

I don't think singles should be allowed on a list like this unless they've been bona fide hits

Why, exactly?

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

The only bitch I have about this list is a more-than-a-handful of 2002 singles, but if it takes some kinda cheating to get Johnny Cash on there then that's forgivable.

I don't think singles should be allowed on a list like this unless they've been bona fide hits (ie millions of people have been exposed to them and they've entered the cultural bloodstream), or they are unavailable on an album.

Oh go fiddle around on Popjustice or something.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, it's a dramatic shift from last year's singles list

There was a singles list last year? I can't find it. I'd be very curious.

BTW, that Spoon song is actually pretty great, though I've relegated it in my mind to 2002.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)


The only bitch I have about this list is a more-than-a-handful of 2002 singles

yeah, this being the first year pfm did this, the rules were a little loose - reissued singles like HoJL and Danger!, plus late 2002 U.S. releases that either peaked or were UK singles in 2003 (hurt, made you look, cry me a river) were fair game.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

There was a singles list last year? I can't find it. I'd be very curious.

no, that's why his complaint is so groundless!

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh I get it!

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I still think "Rock Your Body" > "Cry Me a River"

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

"Pork Your Body" > everything

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but nobody has explained me in what way either of them is better than the Fast Food Song or the Delta Goodrem singles.

Siegbran (eofor), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'm Lovin' It" is the bomb. it should totally make more showings on singles lists, but I get the feeling a lot of people only know the bad McD's jingle versions that rhyme "boyfriend" with "napkin".

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I just like to romanticise the single as a mass culture art form. Several of the singles on this list are just stand-out tracks from albums which most fans would already own. So they're reaching no wider audience, so they are pretty much pointless. (It still irks me when people refer to the Smiths - for example - as 'a singles band'. Sure, they released a lot of singles; sure, they all charted in the UK; sure, they all had genius B-sides; and sure, they all then disppeared without trace in week 2 or 3. The vast majority of them made no impact whatsoever on British life.) Anyhow...there are about 10 great singles on this list, I guess that's pretty good.

Rick Spence (spencerman), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

But the Smiths totally did reach a wider audience - they impacted on the culture, most people listening to music would have been aware of them and who Morrissey was, I remember buying some kids comic in 84/85 and it was taking the piss out of him, he was all over Smash Hits etc. - the thing is the wider audience just mostly didn't like them. But negative impact on a mass culture is still an impact.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Sure to be an unpopular take, but I get the impression that pitchfork has abdicated any attempt to find decent stuff under-the-radar (I'm a non-reviewer who downloads little and didn't buy much this year, but I still know all their "indie" choices) so I'm not sure why they bother including poor-selline MOR indie at all. If you want to make a list of the top singles (i.e. the ones that were loved nation/world wide) then that's fine, and if you want to express your idiosyncratic view of what's high quality, that's fine. Pitchfork's list seems to split the difference in a particularly unhelpful way. I can't see any good reason to look to their list for top-40 stuff, since top-40 type publications will do that already, and does anyone really turn to pitchfork for its timeless writing (BTW, the fetishization of pop music has up and down-swings in critical circles, but we seem to be in the middle of a violent upswing that's losing its sense of proportion)? Meanwhile the "indie" bands they're picking are like the REM's and U2's of yesterday -- I'm as big a blur fan as you'll find, but any critic who argues that there were only 36 singles better than Out Of Time last year is just being lazy. Ditto finding two Manitoba songs to be worthy of the top 50. If pitchfork really feels that there wasn't one obscure but great single last year (M83 and Black Dice come the closest, but is aquarius records now our only source for the outre?) then we're in more need than ever of something akin to Spin's old Underground column. Seriously: recording tools are now in the hands of more people than at any time in history, and you're telling me there's not one single great song that didn't get an internet buzz.

dlp9001, Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)

and you're telling me there's not one single great song that didn't get an internet buzz.

"I Luv U"

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I still think "Rock Your Body" > "Cry Me a River"

Ah, see, but "Cry Me a River" is the closest JT comes to earning his Michael Jackson crown. Not only is it a good pop song, it's kinda creepy. Kinda mean. Not as mean as, say, "Dirty Diana," but getting there.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I heard "I Luv U" back when it came out via...an internet buzz. And it's not remotely, remotely, remotely the kind of thing I'd ever pick up on my own. It's been mentioned in the NY Times recently.

dlp9001, Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha I just read the pitchfork review, and they're copying me metaphor for awkward metaphor.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)

dlp9001 - I'll be interested to see your reaction to the albums list and whether you think there aren't at least a few that have been dragged into the light by pfm and similar sites.

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with you, Kenan, I'm just such a sucker for disco guitar.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I eagerly await it, but that Unicorns album is pretty weak, so my hopes aren't too high. Ditto Menomena...

dlp9001, Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm surprisingly sympathetic to dlp2001 BUT 2003 was also the year when PFM started offering free MP3 downloads of tiny indie bands every month so maybe they felt they'd done their 'duty' and just concentrated on the stuff they liked?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm just such a sucker for disco guitar.

sucker!

But I guess that's what this thread is about. We're admitting to being suckers lately. Right?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Good point, but it's not impossible for the two to overlap.

dlp9001, Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Why are there so many R&B/rap/dance songs on that list? This is NOT a complaint, mind you. Just an observation. How many rock songs are on that list? TWO?? (The Darkness and the Strokes)

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Tico, it's not even as complicated as that. It was a straight vote and most ppl did vote for what they liked. (Granted, the albums list is more indie-business-as-usual). The Mu, I guess, is the only sort-of leftfield choice - the one record ppl are least likely to have heard - but that seems to be a big staff favorite, I don't even know if I could name a reall obscure indie single that built a buzz...were there any that deserved it? I tallied the votes for this and most of the stuff I hadn't heard before was indie hip-hop.

(dlp9001 - I agree about the Unicorns and Menomena...and most of the other Best New Music choices.)

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

*really*

scott pl. (scott pl.), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Their choices may be better but the intro paragraph is still cringeworthy enough to keep me from reading Pitchfork much.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

How many rock songs are on that list? TWO??

Darkness, Strokes, Spoon, Ted Leo, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Libertines, Delgados, Radiohead, Flaming Lips, White Stripes...I count 10.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

11 if you count the Blur track.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh.

Where's the "subtle ILM reference in the #1 spot"? I don't see it.

Mr. Snrub, Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"There's been debate on some music boards frequented by the readers of this site over the intended purpose of music, singles, and the collecting of such."

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

some music boards frequented by the readers of this site

I thought it was obvious Brent D. was referring to the Korn forum at the Sony site.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh come on, he could be talking about ANY music message board.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Does anyone else sing along with the "Ignition" remix with Dave Chapelle lyrics? I can't hear it any other way now.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm pretty sure "Personal Jesus" was Johnny Cash's 2002 single, and "Hurt" was not released until 2003.

If you believe this list should only be made up of mainstream hits, then should "Ghettomusick" be included?

billstevejim, Thursday, 18 December 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

The individual is awoken from his existential stupor to a state of authenticity by angst, i.e. you're growing up and Heidegger woz rite.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 18 December 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I was wondering about "Ghettomusick" myself -- was that even a single? AFAIK, "Hey Ya!" b/w "The Way You Move" was the first single, and then "Bowtie" and "Prototype."

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

'Ghettomusick/She Lives In My Lap' was the first single, it dropped on 12" and was supposed to have a video. I think they are holding it back so it coincides better with the HBO movie that they are making, I suppose.

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Thursday, 18 December 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

noone's mentioned that they actually bothered to put up the covers of each single with the entries, which i thought was pretty neat.

oh, and I have to mention my favorite Brent D.-ism of the whole thing, from the Blur blurb: "Producer Ben Hillier, who's quickly becoming the best, builds the.." etc etc. from now on I shall frame all my compliments in the form of "[x] is quickly becoming the best."

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 18 December 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

"...you should set up a blog then Scott."
yes, please do

Felcher (Felcher), Thursday, 18 December 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

that's a really good list!

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 18 December 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess potentially a problem is that the top 10 is packed with hip hop and r&b as if to compensate for its relative sparsity elsewhere, but even that's a good sign!

this line put a big smile on my face:

"Ignition" was so dense with pop genius he could've farmed it out for four or five separate songs-- I'd happily get down to a track called "I'm Like 'So What, I'm Drunk!'"

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 18 December 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't want to spoil anything for anybody, but all I'm saying is there might or might not be a misdirected link to the #1-#10 singles page.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Oops, guess it was fixed! But not before I found out the top 10 albums, haha! (*rubs hands together with glee*)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm not saying that they're identical by any means, but both this year's and last year's PF choices for album of the year have extremely similar fashion styles/images (and in my opinion aren't worthy of the album of the year, although the rapture are much more interesting better than interpol). Plus, they're both reaching back 20 years. whats up with that?

Felcher (Felcher), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

i caught it jaymc, thanks for the tip. Was expecting BSS to be much higher, oh well.

Felcher (Felcher), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmmm, the Rapture may be "more interesting," but IMO, Turn on the Bright Lights is a much stronger album than Echoes. I'm shocked by #2, actually. Mark R. is probably their biggest supporter, and even he admitted that the new album was a bit disappointing after their debut (which was #4 last year, IIRC).

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, i caught me by surprise too. I love the Books and Thought For Food was my #1 pick for last year (thanks for the exposure Mark), but i don't know if it'd make my top 10 this year. although, it's status as #2 makes the parallells(sp?) to last year's list all the more noticeable.

Felcher (Felcher), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

where is this albums list? link?

amateur!st (amateurist), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

It was a misdirected link that I discovered and has since been fixed. I didn't want to spoil anything, but if people want me to post it here, I will.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Please don't?

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it went back in hiding until tomorrow. A tried a little URL tinkering and kept getting 404 pages.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

(Wow, that sounded weak. "Why can't you stop hitting yourself? Huh?" (SLAP SLAP) "C'mon! Stop hitting yourself!" Forget I said anything.)

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, the whole list is already posted elsewhere. The page was misposted over the Top 10 Singles page, it was up for maybe 15 minutes and it's already all over the web. The power of the Internet.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I won't post it, Chris. (Although I guess we've already mentioned #1 and #2.) It probably deserves its own thread tomorrow, anyway.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Is it immature or uncool not to like justin timberlake?

adam michel (adam michel), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Chris, yeah, that's how I found it. ;)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Neither, it's just that his album came out in November 2002.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 18 December 2003 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"some of which claimed (maybe even rightly) that commercial pop seems to be at its most creative height since the 1960s."

Who's claiming that? I want names.

2003 may be parallel with the early 90s, but certainly not the 60s. I wasn't alive then or anything, but I always imagined 60s radio to be virtally non-stop greatness, with maybe one not-so-great song roughly every 30 minutes, whereas today's pop stations usually play one good song, then one bad song, and if they play two good songs in a row, it's likely they'll play two bad songs right after it. So it's like 50/50 today.

billstevejim, Thursday, 18 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

The early-mid 80s were pretty damn great, at least in the UK.

LondonLee (LondonLee), Thursday, 18 December 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Only the good ones get remembered. I'd wager that people cursed the radio as much in 1964 as they will in 2004, and if it happened less in 1964 then it's only cos there were less people and elss radio stations.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 19 December 2003 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)

nearly all of the amazon shoppers' lists make the claim that reading pitchfork makes them a music know-it-all.

keith m (keithmcl), Friday, 19 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)

amazon.com as a music information resource is ridiculously outdone by amg

and those lists are truly garbage

adam michel (adam michel), Friday, 19 December 2003 03:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Rollie's blurbs are really awful, even by his standards with such a high vocab-cramming to content ratio. and the hyperbole factor (seemingly not self conscious at all) is through the roof. Kelis' "Milkshake" as "one of the most daring statements of the year!? And the short summary over the top (haha -- "OTT") praise to close 'em like "Brilliant."

Show, don't tell Rollie!

Also huge gaffe by Stousy on the "gossip folks" blurb building it all around missy's "innovation" in what's really a sampled chorus from double dutch bus.

despite brent d's weird sentences (maybe just victims of editing like with scott?) his read pretty well, and mark richardson's are pretty killer.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:02 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean some of the things getting praise as boundary-pushing or whatevs are just like getting it coz ppl. seem unaware that this stuff has been going on in various ways for quite some time.

which is why "boundary-pushing" is usually a bad criteria for "goodness".

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Unless it's rock writing that pushes boundaries, right?

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:21 (twenty-two years ago)

nate are you being a punk again?

(haha meltzer on bangs-as-beat to thread)

if i wanted fucking transgressive rockwrite i'd read MRR!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(i don't)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:23 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, when I had to do my own list for PopMatters, I realized how much my taste in/reaction to individual songs differs from my taste in/reaction to albums. The cartoon version? Well, I prefer the former to be upbeat and the latter to be introspective. That's just me.

But I'm not ashamed of this, and Pitchfork needn't be either.

(PopMatters album list was great, as is Pitchfork's singles list, and probably vice versa.)

I think this "popist vs rockist" conceit (if such a thing even exists outside of our collective unconscious -- i.e/ ILM World) is a pendulum swing, and we're currently at the pop end of that swing. That's fine. But just like there were very few actual corny indie fux0rs back in the '90s, there are probably very few people who only listen to Chart Pop now as a matter of principle. I think most of us -- I make this sweeping judgment after reading ILM for a year now -- listen to a variety of indie/chart/hip hop with whatever niche stuff we tack on due to individual personal tastes (with an acknowledgement that "indie" is itself currently a niche -- perhaps I oughta just say "rock"). (The other acknowledgement is that what I just said is very much North America-centric, and the UK is very different in its relation to chart vs "underground", a whole 'nother tangent here.)

So, anyway, good for both Pitchfork and (shameless plug for the webzine I write for) PopMatters. To use a 90s phrase -- it's all good, right? ;-)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.clubbang.net/9-29-01/BANG-30.JPG

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)

(Nate bes a punk while Waldo Clover looks on in bafflement)

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Love becomes mutually assured destruction as Dizzee Rascal, a mere sixteen-going-on-hopeless, tumbles out the grim and hateful lyrics of "I Luv U", starting up a contemptuous smackfest with guest-girl Jeanine Jacques who insists her friend is "juiced up" with his kid.

uh.

tom west (thomp), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

drunkenness leads to pregnancy, yes, but there are steps in between

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:28 (twenty-two years ago)

okay try this for size -- there was a period in the late 90s when hip-hop was changing v. quickly *and* was explicitly doing so in a future-technoid trip *and* this coincided with uh y2kish type mentality stuff and the "internet revolution" and etc.

so there was this confluence where the idea of "changing in order to say new and different things relevant to a changing and always new and different world and because saying the same things over and over is different than saying those same things the first time *anyway*" became linked to the idea of future-noise.

which opened up a space for avant-indie future-noise crossover with ppl. who want music that *speaks to them* and this crossover is now sorting itself out, but pfork's (okay just rollie's) lateness to the game is finding future-noise in frikin In Da Club and rendering the whole thing super-absurd.

?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:30 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm really just rehashing sinker's noise essay here, i realize, though with a bit of a twist.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:32 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway waldo clover is CLEARLY the better dancer!

http://www.clubbang.net/9-29-01/BANG-28.JPG

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:43 (twenty-two years ago)

But it's hard to get people to notice or care when you hang out with Nicolas Cage

nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, there's something in what you're saying, Sterling. But instead of fashioning a rod for beating (Pitchfork, cornyindiefuxxors) out of that, why don't we acknowledge the turning of the wheel, or the swinging of the pendulum, and celebrate the big scary mystery of it all?

(I'm only being partly facetious -- i.e./ it's all good.)

(And why am I trying to continue this discussion in the face of a real life Waldo, anyway?)

David A. (Davant), Friday, 19 December 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)

(I keep thinking waldo's punk friend is a young flea.)

bnw (bnw), Friday, 19 December 2003 07:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Sterling, how is 'Milkshake' not a daring first single? Sure, it isn't as explosively out-of-pocket as "Young, Fresh N New" but still, in the realm of R&B singles, I think it's a big step forward to see someone succeeding with experimental ideas, even they've been done before. What exactly would you say about the song?

Where did I say that "In Da Club" is somehow ultra-progressive? I said it's one of the most popular singles of the year, especially for a guy who came out of nowhere. I also described the song. I don't understand what your criteria is for a good blurb, but I don't quite see what's so wrong with my writing.

Your whole assumption of my take on 'future noise' is short-sighted, especially based on just a few short blurbs.

I'm not well-liked, am I?

Rollie Pemberton (Rollie Pemberton), Friday, 19 December 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

It's "erect", not "erupt". Did that get fixed when they did the link to the top 10 as well?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 19 December 2003 08:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Stupid question, it must've been.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 19 December 2003 08:18 (twenty-two years ago)

this list is littered with songs i can barely even make it all the way through before i have to mute them or stop them.

i'm not in the mood to pick them out and comment on each, but here are a few words off the top of my head: the darkness and 50 cent, what the fuck , SUCKERS
pitchfork, your tubes are clogged.

reo, Friday, 19 December 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

"experimental ideas, even they've been done before."

?

more to the point i don't get the "blaxploitation vigilante" bit at all.

and "in da club" was, as far as i know, a single AFTER 50 jacked lots of hype -- for the em signing, for wanksta, for "how to rob an industry" and the story behind *that* and etc. but the "progressive" part was the "densely packed synthetic slabs and mechanical handclaps" not to mention the "questionably dark in tone" thing where i'm just like "wait!? does this guy have any *idea* what gets played in clubs".

anyway though it grates beyond my disagreements with yr ideas (coz i'll disagree with plenty of ideas) coz of the tongue twister alliteration style that hurts my brane, like yr. words are just backing up onto one another.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean for *you* In Da Club might have "lived up to" its "hype" but for lots of people it *made* the hype, and for the other segment wanksta or all the underground mixtapes or whatever already *did*.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I was really impressed that Brent DiCrescenzo, in his review of Blur's 'Out of Time', used a lovely-sounding word I didn't know, misopolemic:

Producer Ben Hillier, who's quickly becoming the best, builds the rich, misopolemic ballad over a field recording of a Moroccan string orchestra.

What could it mean? A hatred of argument? A turbulent Japanese soup?

Merriam Webster told me the word didn't exist, and provided the following suggestions for what Brent might have wanted to call this Blur song:

1. mesopelagic
2. Mesopotamia
3. misspelling
4. mesophyllic
5. misapplication
6. mesotheliomas
7. miasmically
8. misspellings
9. misapplications
10. mesothelioma

1. refers to the depth of oceans, 4. to the layers of leaves, 6. is a tumor, and 7. a vaporous disease-forming exhalation.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 19 December 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

According to this site (which appears to be some sort of linguistic playhouse), misopolemic means "a hater of war."

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 19 December 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

And the Google says:

Misopolemic- a hater of war.

Still doesn't justify the usage of the word though. Is obfuscation an ingredient in indie cred these days?

CRAP BEAT ME TO THE PUNCH

Jole, Friday, 19 December 2003 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)

"these days"

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 19 December 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

If you know a pretty word and you want to use it and it fits best then you should go ahead and they can damn well look it up. I reckon. Come on these are INDIE FANS their whole raison d'etre is being into 'difficult' stuff oh wait.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 19 December 2003 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Then it truly is a lovely word and I shall have it embroidered on a flag and spelled out in seaweed in my next bowl of Japanese alphabet soup.

I would also like to praise Brent for his neat summation, in the Outkast 'Hey Ya' review, of the Contract v. Status models of aesthetic value, which he rather confusingly calls Side A and Side B. Rather un-misopolemic here, he declares Side A the likely winner because 'Hey Ya' has awarded them the A bomb.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 19 December 2003 14:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Is "Out of Time" an ode to pacifist behavior? I never read it that way, but if it is, Brent's OTM.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 19 December 2003 14:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, Momus, he's referring to Side A and Side B of the single: "The Way You Move" b/w "Hey Ya".

o. nate (onate), Friday, 19 December 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

No he isn't, Nate, read it:

There's been debate on some music boards frequented by the readers of this site over the intended purpose of music, singles, and the collecting of such. Side A holds true to the idea that music is a unifying cultural force that holds meaning only in context of who it reaches and brings together. These people erect mashups of Kraftwerk and Whitney Houston. Side B believes music exists for music's sake and a idealized, context-less listening experience-- an artistic outpouring meaningful only in its outpouring. "Hey Ya" gives the A Bomb to Side A.

That's exactly why I called his use of A and B 'confusing'.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 19 December 2003 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, he is. When he says "Side A", he's talking about "The Way You Move". When he talks about "Side B", he's referring to "Hey Ya". He says "Hey Ya" gives the "A Bomb to Side A" because he thinks it's the better song.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 19 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, wait, maybe you're right. I guess he's referring to the sides of the debate that he mentions in the first sentence. Heck, that confused me too.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 19 December 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Pitchfork's Albums of the year list is up. I rather like that I haven't heard of most of the stuff in it, and that only one of my personal Top 10 is even in their Top 50; 'The Lemon of Pink' by The Books, nice and high in their number 2 spot.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 19 December 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Brent is quickly becoming the best, you know.

Al (sitcom), Friday, 19 December 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

i was confused by that because when something is the bomb its good! or it was two years ago at least and i thought brent was just using old slang.

like saying Side A was the bomb diggity, you know?

(word)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 19 December 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.