Do you listen to and follow music to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived pleasures?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I think I used to be a lot more guilty of this than I am now. Perhaps it will sound lame, or even new-agey for me to make this confession, but one day about 2 years ago, I suddenly realized that all the money and energy I was pouring into researching and buying all this ultimately disposable music was a method for me to distract myself from finding true purpose and meaning in my life. and although I'm still not entirely sure what that purpose is, I think I'm at least starting out the right track to finding it.

Anyway, the side story of this is that many of my friends feel that I am actively shunning music (not true), or that I have set my music-buying standards so high that I won't spend a lot of time and money searching out obscure shit just to find a few gems, something I used to do all the time (probably true). It's not that I don't care to find good new music, it's just that it doesn't really seem worth the effort because I now feel that there are other things that are much more important to me. I mean, I'm not going to be on my death bed wishing I had listened to the Fiery fucking Furnaces, right?

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else has grappled with this issue in themselves, and thought about what it means to engage in this sort of cross between art appreciation and fanboydom while wars rage and horrible atrocities spread across the planet. it often seems sad and inexcusable that it's easier for me to get excited and passionate about some stupid CD than events that affect the wellbeing of the human race, and the world at large. and when i step back and read that, it seems horribly ludicrous, awful even.

does anyone have any reflections on these things? how do you justify the way you spend your time? does the commodification of music undermine its ultimate goals to the human spirit? do you see any hypocrisy in the amount of time you spend on music and your political beliefs? if you didn't have music, how would you spend your time? would you spend it better or worse? what is it you look for music to evoke in you that causes you to spend so much time on it? is your music ultimately a distraction, or a reason to live? these are the big meta-questions that plague me.

King Korn Karn, Monday, 25 October 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going out on a limb here but just discovering this about yourself is enough.

I know several people who are yet to come to the same conclusion.

At this stage of my life I'm decidedly more interested in making my own music rather than listening to someone elses.

papa november (papa november), Monday, 25 October 2004 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

ANSWER ME OR I'LL KILL YOU

King Korn Karn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Umm, if it wasn't music, it'd be something else taking up your passion. So pretty good that it's music right? Still, I think I know whatcha mean. In short - music is a reason to live, but it can be a distraction. For me, I just gotta keep it in perspective, you know, without going nuts. That is, enjoy the obsession, but avoid letting it eat me up. Or something.

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you listen to and follow (indie rock) to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived pleasures?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously, I do buy less cd's than I used to, but it's not because I think music is silly or useless or less important than before. It's just because I feel more confident in my tastes and standards of what I want to listen to.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)

are you Nick Hornby?

Sympatico (shmuel), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Also my political beliefs might not be what they are without all the music I've listened to (and I don't mean politically-explicit music, either).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd probably own more CDs than I do if I hadn't realized this. But I also just find myself trying to get more fulfillment out of fewer albums. Some people buy/download so much music that I can't see how they're really absorbing it all.

Ultimately I think one needs a greater purpose than just checking out and listening to tons of music, even if that purpose is just actually writing about the music or making your own. I actually found that element of "High Fidelity" to be right on -- the part about the main character needing to feel like he is "bringing something into the world" (paraphrasing) and not just a "professional appreciator".

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)

so he Djs and puts out a dub of a RTX record, woo

Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

BLONDE GF: "Good idea on the label release, Rob, but we just got a call from Drag City about that...something about them already releasing it, something about 'royal trucks' "

CUSAK: "should I sleep with Lisa Bonet again?"

BLONDE GF: "What?"

CUSAK: "Sorry, you're not supposed to be around when I monologue."

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

For collectors, music is commodified. For enthusiasts, music is deified. Music and politics aren't at all separate. Arguing that music has played no serious role in world events would be pretty ridiculous. It's important to care about the world around you, but I don't think you have to sacrifice everything you love in order to do so. That would make life...suck...you know?

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

(arguing that music hasn't, obviously)

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

or wait, no. I CAN'T READ

babyalive (babyalive), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

No.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

By which I mean, for better or for worse, this has more or less become my 'true purpose in life', at least for now.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

And also, music offers qualities that go beyond 'material pleasures'.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Yep.

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

do you see any hypocrisy in the amount of time you spend on music and your political beliefs?

Hm, maybe but

if you didn't have music, how would you spend your time?

much worse, I'm fairly sure, if not criminally.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Ultimately I think one needs a greater purpose than just checking out and listening to tons of music, even if that purpose is just actually writing about the music or making your own.

good point. i think that's an important issue for me; that there must be some sort of dialogue between the media and myself. i feel like one of the big points for me in how i spend my time is that i want to grow as a person when i do things, and unless i have some sort of dialogue with my media, or create media by myself, it is ultimately somewhat useless to me in the long run.

furthermore, in regards to what someone else said, I understand that there's no hard separation between "life" and "music", and that they are clearly interconnected, yet I found that there was a point where I found that doing certain things like watching TV and obsessively listening to music kept me from engaging completely in the real world. Although these things might complement or enhance our lives, I eventually came to the conclusion that focusing on them as a major part of my daily life was doing an injustice to my limited time on this earth, and moreover was causing me to, in a way, de-evolve.

anyway, this epiphany planted itself in my brain one fine morning in early 2003, and my obsessiveness for music simply slipped away, almost overnight. i still listen to music, but i couldn't even tell you a good album i discovered in 2004, which when i hear myself saying, i find somewhat hard to believe, considering the way i used to be.

also, maybe what happened to me was that the highs stopped coming. music used to give me what I was looking for in my life in general-- those brief moments of sublime pleasure. maybe it could even be likened to an addiction, where music was the drug i used most often to produce feelings of pleasure. yet, as time progressed, the highs were never as high as they used to be, and i'd have to try harder and harder to get that previous high, which resulted in me searching for weirder, crazier, and more obscure music (to be slightly facetious about it). it was going through this consistently disappointing process of finding new music that i discovered that the music wasn't having the strong effects on me that it used to. from this, i concluded that i was misguidedly trying to achieve positive feelings by obsessively consuming music, and i had been pathetically reduced to searching for a high. i guess i felt in my heart that for real, lasting pleasure i'd have to go somewhere deeper than consuming all these mass produced products.

and although i still appreciate music, and certain albums still give me intense pleasure, i'm not convinced that it is beneficial for me to search out new albums to do this, and anyway i have definitely lost my zeal for it. compounding this is the fact that the commodification and celebrity culture of music has further discouraged me from walking that road again. interestingly, i've sort of rediscovered musical pleasure in folk music from around the world, which has a certain stripped down and spiritually purposeful 'soul' to it that i now feel is rarely observable in most commercially produced music. but even this is a very minor pleasure i take, and where music used to be my life, it is now only a subtle footnote. i mostly just enjoy the silence-- which of course, my friends who claim to listen to 8+ hours of music a day find disappointing and lame of me. they say that i'm just a malcontent now because i don't bother with it; they say my standards have gotten too high. i dunno, i guess i just prefer to call it a different set of priorities.

anyway i don't mean to criticize the music consuming habits of anyone here; these are only personal observations that i noticed in myself, and i just thought i'd throw them out there to see if anyone else had similar feelings.

King Korn Karn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 05:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i think that's an important issue for me; that there must be some sort of dialogue between the media and myself.

This is one of the most exciting things to me about "keeping up" with music (or any art form, really), aside from the sonic pleasures of any given record: the notion that your experiences with and ideas about that record are part of a larger discourse. Writing about music professionally is probably the most obvious way to engage in that discourse, but I find something thrilling about just having good conversations with other people about music. (And obviously ILM and the blogosphere serve as intermediary realms.)

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

King Korn - how old were you in early 2003 when this epiphany occured?

This thread is very interesting.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe I'm just being cranky here, but I call bullshit.
Political beliefs? pfft.
Celebrity culture?
ULTIMATELY DISPOSABLE MUSIC!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Everything in life is ultimately disposable, KKK(ahem). I think you should join a zen monastary and fuck right off.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you should fuck right off this thread and leave it to people who actually want to discuss the issues raised properly.

In response to KKK's original question: yes. There used to be someone who filled that void in my life and then all of a sudden that person wasn't there any more.

How I went about forlornly trying to refill that void is extensively documented.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously though, I don't follow new music the way I did as a teenager either, but I don't feel the need to justify it with all this..............crap.
I don't understand how you reason that this "epiphany" makes you a better person or whatever is is you're trying to say. True purpose? Meaning in life? Dollars to donuts you're not EVER going to find these things until long after you're dead.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:07 (twenty-one years ago)

(I'm willing to discuss this properly Carlin, I'm trying to understand here...it would be another thing altogether if I had just made that first post and left.)

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

You came on this thread to cause trouble, Dork, and you've been given the same treatment as everyone else who tries to come on a thread and cause trouble. Do you understand that?

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not trying to cause trouble, my first post was not entirely serious.
How is it unreasonable to ask for a little more elucidation here? KKK has rattled off ten long paragraphs that don't really say anything to me about how his life has really been made better by any of this. I have very strong doubts that it possibly could.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Why don't you try reading them, if indeed you're capable of doing so? Do your homework. We're not here to service indolent retards.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

My inference of what KKK (unfortunate acronym) is saying is that YES, everything IS disposable (because we all die), but isn't it daft to waste ALL one's time on only ONE TYPE of disposable thing that might be more FUN and more MEANINGFUL and have a better impact on other people's lives thus leading you to enjoy your life more.

Sitting in a room on one's own "engaging" with music as a substitue for sitting in room with other people "engaging" with them. I gather Marcello used to (figuratively) sit in a room with a person AND some music and "engage" with both, thus getting the best of both worlds (apologies for any projection/assumption here, Marcello).

I am certainly feeling less and less as though being a "professional appreciator" is what I want, but I do still need som ekind of relationship/dialogue with music/culture.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I did read them, Mr. Carlin. I want more.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Missed a phrase in the first line after "ONE TYPE of disposable thing" = "when there are others which might be".

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost
Some of us wouldn't mind.
How cute is the indolent retard in question?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, to answer the question without answering it: maybe.
But I'm too tired to seriously think about this.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, Nick, don't currently have a person to sit in my front room and engage with.

Sitting in a room on one's own "engaging" with music as a substitute for sitting in a room with other people "engaging" with them

Yes that's pretty much my situation as it stands, though I would prefer to think of it as an alternative rather than a substitute.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

ouch. Remind me to call the girl I'm seeing and cry hysterically tomorrow.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)

That's what I meant, Marcello - that you used to have a person to sit in the front room with but don't at the moment, hence the blog etcetera.

I'm wondering if maybe I've hit a peak point, a fruition, a goal that I was aiming for and that probably wont be surpassed again, and maybe I should just chill the fuck out about music now, enjoy what I like and keep "an interest", but spend time enjoying other things too.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I would agree with that, except in my case there aren't any "other things" to enjoy at the moment.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

That sounds like my cue to grab a few hours of sleep and shuffle off to wait more tables.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:52 (twenty-one years ago)

The "at the moment" caveat is a positive, MC.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

If KKK was using music as a substitute for relating to other human beings, that's one thing. For me, that's probably the only thing that really takes precedent over music and if that was the case, I'm happy for him. If not, I'd still like to know how this decision has made any real difference, and I'd especially like to know how one goes about "finding their true purpose", which as KKK himself said, sounds a bit lame and new agey. And is it really necessary to justify personal interests because you are not fully immersed in world events? I don't understand where he's coming from there either.
The zen monk/fuck right off thing was out of line. Even though it was intended to be facetious, I apologize if anyone took that seriously.

Let's not make this personal Marcello, hmm? I don't know you and you don't know me.
I'm not some random troll who just googled his way in here, I'm here everyday and you'll find I am perfectly reasonable if you can refrain from trying to insult me personally. I won't push the issue any further if you don't.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll refrain from trying to insult you personally if you refrain from coming on threads and trying to insult other posters personally IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I just took that comment back! Please sir, I'm trying to make amends here.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Besides I don't see how "I think you should join a zen monastery and fuck right off." could be construed as a personal comment or even serious! I mean "Dork"? "Indolent retard"? That's personal and you don't seem to want to drop it either. I'm trying to apologize for my rashness upthread, it's 3 AM here and I know I could have used a bit more tact.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)

BOY! 100 lines by lunchtime! "I must not try it."

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:04 (twenty-one years ago)

if you refrain from coming on threads and trying to insult other posters personally IN THE FIRST PLACE

good advice, we should all do that. oh wait...

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see how "I think you should join a zen monastery and fuck right off." could be construed as a personal comment or even serious

this is 'funny' if you've been paying attention

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

All right, this is ridiculous. I don't feel the need to try to explain myself further. I have apologized, I have recanted that ridiculous first post as much as I possibly can without ILX having a delete function. A flip comment posted in jest does not usually incur such wrath around here. In all the time I've posted here it's never happened to me before.
If you're looking for a fight you will not find it with me. I can admit that I was wrong about the twattish comments made above.
My serious inquiries into KKK's posts stand, though.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

yes he is looking for a fight. don't worry about it.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Am not!

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

DON'T TRY IT

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I am in fact lazy, a dork and probably retarded. So I'm not worried.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

But the world should be.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:23 (twenty-one years ago)

ZING!

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I used to like this thread, then I was less keen, then it was OK again. Now it is poor.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sorry, it's all my fault.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Perhaps this will make it even worse....
Serious question, Marcello:
I'd like to know how, say this one here:
Judging by your lax grammar and syntax, you should be the last person to complain about artforms (sic) being "unintellectual" (sic). Perhaps you were turned down for a job and are therefore using this thread to vent your envy at people more talented than you could ever hope to be, or people whose lives are so much better, qualitatively and quantitatively, than yours will ever be.

Now fuck off.

-- Marcello Carlin (marcellocarli...), February 5th, 2004 5:35 AM.

-is really any different (besides the fact that I used lax grammar and syntax, and you wrote a nice proper paragraph) than what I did on this thread. It was your first post on that thread, you vehemently disagreed with the opening post, and you said so - none too cordially.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Moral weight was in my favour.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never rally thought of music as a material pleasure. Maybe the objects that contain (?) the music are material, at least if we are excluding enjoyment of live music, but music itself is a spiritual, mental, social or intellectual pleasure more than a physical one. For some people, of course, this isn't the case, but I don't really get that so...

I wonder if the prevalence of downloaded music helps decrease it's existence as a commodity, as an object? It's certainly different from people who need to buy clothes or cars etc. to gain happiness.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-but Uncut magazine sucks! ;-P
x-post

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously though, you even apologized downthread!

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Can we stop the guttersniping now and just talk about our SOULS?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

fuck that emo shit you ponce

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

(love you really)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Nick, how exactly would you define "souls"? Why is Cathy Berberian "soul" but not Donald Peers?

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, you see I don't believe that "soul" even exists...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Why of course "soul" exists, I saw him only the other week in Jerry Springer The Opera!

Thank you very much ladies and gentlemen, you've been a marvellous audience, my name's Hope and Keen, park your Crazy Bus nicely, good night...

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i totally recognize the sentiment in the original post, and its something i think about a lot. ive concluded, though, that while my musical consumptive habits MAY have something to do with my existential discontent and boredom and local depression, my love for music goes beyond any pathology like this. so yes, i too feel like i get obsessive sometimes. additionally, ILX/M-posting is a clearer example for me of this soul-void stuff. but i mean, think of all the other more harmful shit i could be doing. and plus, im at work at a fairly unchallenging, bone dry project. what else can i do? email people to try to get dates now that my love life is barren and uncertain? whoops! im a freak!

/bleh.

peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I've asked myself roughly the same questions that started this thread and I think that to some degree, yes, I am using music to fill a void, or several voids; although I'm not convinced I would lose all interest in music if I had everything else I wanted in my life, even if my relationship to music would no doubt change. In my case though, I have a pretty clear idea of what needs to be changed, if not excatly how to go about changing it. It's not a matter of looking for some larger purpose, though that doesn't mean there isn't some existential crisis looming in my future. I just don't find that looking at my life at a really general level and asking myself what I should be doing with it has been all that helpful. I am happier when I handle it more intuitively and when I focus more on specific things I want to do, rather than some overarching larger purpose. Sadly, I have also found that engaging in activities that do serve what seems to me to be an important larger purpose (e.g., some dabbling with political activism) doesn't necessarily make me happy. I have a feeling I am going to be becoming politically active again in the near future though. Too much is at stake. If, on the one hand, engaging in activity that serves a higher purpose (that I really think is important) isn't enough to make me happy, feeling that much of what I value in society is headed into oblivion, and that maybe civlization itself (rough-hewn though it is), is also at risk, tends to sap life of some of its enjoyment. There's not much "purpose" left an irreligious sort like myself outside of some relation to other people, to society in general, to future generations.

(If anything, my internet is probably more of an unhealthy attempt to fill a void.)

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I felt as though I was moving towards ultimate truth last week. But I got sick this week, did very little, watched TV, was depressed, and so
now I am a little behind on things.

Music surely makes things more bearable, even exciting sometimes.

Music can be inspiring. It can inspire one to do better, be better, and so on.

The part that confuses me is not that I spend so much money on music, it's that other people aren't as passionate about music as I am. Life would be better if I could spend more time talking about music and less time thinking about stupid things like politics (just kidding).

But I did have a horrible nightmare about the US presidential election
last night

The TAO that can be Posted is not the TAO! (The Tao that can be Posted is), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Change is good. Get immersed in loads of great music this year. Travel next year. Then some shoegaze collecting. Then get stuck into learning to cook Vietnamese food for friends (music nuts only of course - haha!) Then explore obscure psychedelic albums. Then write that book. So on and so forth. This is my objective - balance, balance, balance. Not something I achieve anywhere as much as I'd like, but there you go.

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Nice post.
For me, my love of music has finally pointed me in the direction of trying to incorporate it into the way I make a living, how I earn money. I play guitar, and have started to give lessons...thereby doing what I love and also making money at it. I'll also be starting up lessons again, after a 13-year hiatus. (!) My hope is that one day I will be able to support myself (and my family - obviously their well-being and security is more important than me liking what I do) solely on teaching music. So to answer your question -- the main 'void in my soul' has always been that I've never been able to figure out what I'd like to do for a profession. And now maybe music will fill that.

57 7th (calstars), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Good luck 57 man. All that effort you've put into loving music, it's only fair it should pay you back with an income. ;)

Piers (piers), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

First off--

King Korn - how old were you in early 2003 when this epiphany occured?

I was 24.

KKK - an unfortunate acronym

Shit. I didn't notice that awful acronym. The name is from a character in a 1987 video game Pro Wrestling, for NES. My apologies. I am not a racist.


Anyway, I knew that this thread would cause some people to react negatively to what I was saying-- after all, it's a sentiment that is easy to mock, and difficult to explain, and hard as hell to defend in an era of cynicism. And to respond to other jabs, I'm not sure if this change in me has been for the better or for the worse. I would lean towards better, if only that I've stopped to reflect on what the important things in my life are, and how I should spend my energy to reflect that.

King Korn "Carn", Tuesday, 26 October 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

And by the way, I hope the insults and nonsense going on above doesn't discourage anyone from posting on this thread. I want to talk to people about this.

King Korn "Carn", Tuesday, 26 October 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Every CD I buy is a substitute for a beautiful girl/woman I see walking down the street. Every CD I buy is a substitute for a happy couple I see walking down the street. Every CD I buy is imaginary landfill for whatever the void is that keeps me lonely and assless. Music makes the unspeakable ever-present frustrations of life tolerable.

do the sublimation, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Every CD I buy is a substitute for a beautiful girl/woman I see walking down the street. Every CD I buy is a substitute for a happy couple I see walking down the street. Every CD I buy is imaginary landfill for whatever the void is that keeps me lonely and assless. Music makes the unspeakable ever-present frustrations of life tolerable.

It sounds like you're being facetious, but then what you're saying also sounds entirely plausible, where you say it in a way that might elicit laughter, but behind the laughter there is a truth to it. If what you are saying is true, then do you feel that the music is truly an adequate surrogate for what you are looking for, or are you "settling" for something lesser when you don't get what you are really looking for? And do you find this state of events acceptable? And are you willing to continue doing it at the cost of getting the "ass" you seek?

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

What I am conveying lies beyond laughter and plausibility. It is a state of affairs in which someone socially crippled (and hence sexually frustrated) maintains a veneer of popular cultural (hip) superiority inversely proportional to profound (if concealed) inadequacy, with the quixotic goal in mind of one day impressing a supermodel with musical taste and record collection size. Somehow prodigious musical acquisition will translate into her mind into heroic virility. There is nothing else to be done in this fallen world.

do the sublimation, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

So, are you expecting it to work out the way you envision it?

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never rally thought of music as a material pleasure. Maybe the objects that contain (?) the music are material, at least if we are excluding enjoyment of live music, but music itself is a spiritual, mental, social or intellectual pleasure more than a physical one.

OTM, as others might say.

I think, however, there is a certain amount of hypocrisy when it comes to my large(ish) record collection against my political beliefs, and a hypocrisy which is not really very justifiable. Nor do I think, at this current moment in time, that downloading music helps to resolve this conflict - to do so I have, after all, had to purchase a computer and the Broadband connection with it, which is an indulgent luxury as much as the purchase of vinyl or CDs.

And whilst the 'spiritual' side to this argument is something I find slightly nauseating (yes, it would be nice to find transcendence and/or meaning, but there isn't any, you are on your own, you will die, there is nothing afterwards, terribly sorry) music has provided an impetus to keep going and an inspiration to question things (normally unrelated to overt subject matter, for some reason) that nothing else has.

So, in summary, I don't know.

[x-post: as for getting some 'ass', of course it will work! It's fool-proof!]

emil.y (emil.y), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I am not expecting it to work out the way I envision it anymore than, like I once expected as a child, I too would make music some day other people would celebrate. But we must live until we die.

emil.y, I must be worse than a fool then.

do the sublimation, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

And whilst the 'spiritual' side to this argument is something I find slightly nauseating (yes, it would be nice to find transcendence and/or meaning, but there isn't any, you are on your own, you will die, there is nothing afterwards, terribly sorry)

Why nauseating? Not saying that it's necessarily true in your case or with anyone else here, but I think that many people reject the spiritual because it is not easily quantifiable or explainable, and it leads to ideas that are buttressed by more by vague and undefinable feelings more than articulable concepts, which leaves a funny taste in our logical minds, and also many of us have associative issues with spirituality (i.e. seeing flakey "spiritual" new agers with power crystals in SUVs). Nevertheless, I think it's important, and something that's easily overlooked or pushed to the side without being given its fair due because of its elusive nature.

But then, maybe it is silly to speak of "true meaning" in one's life, given that the meaning only comes from what you assign that meaning to be. Yet, it does not stop me from feeling that some assigned meanings are more worthy than others, and what most people assign as their meanings are simply distractions that allow them to divorce themselves from engagement with reality, in the same way that an alcoholic feels he needs to drink to psychologically make it to the next day, or at least to escape the numbing boredom he faces due to his lack of engagement in the first place. Now, I'm not going to say that every music fanatic is like this, but I don't think I would be going out on a limb to say it's true for at least some of them, and I think I used to be one myself. But let me just posit this one hypothetical situation, and I say this without any smugness, hostility, irony, or self-righteousness: suppose for a moment, just imagine, a world in which all of us just spent, let's say a QUARTER of the time that we spend on music, TV, and all that, on doing something positive in the world, whatever that may be (of course, I don't really know what these positive actions would be or how they would manifest themselves in real life), but wouldn't it change a lot to have the world have the same enthusiasm for that as what we have for our personal hobbies? I think it could make all the difference in our increasingly fractured and dysfunctional world. Now, I'm as guilty as anyone in NOT doing doing these undefined positive things, and it is not a pleasant feeling for me, and I often feel disgust for myself in my inaction, but I continue to justify it by saying that "Oh, I don't know what I'd do."

And I know some of you out there will read this and immediately dismiss it as the tedious ramblings of some lame hippie guy who's got his head up his ass (or arse, if you are British), but I am not a hippie, nor am I a spaced out new age guy. I'm someone just like all of you, and I'm just looking for some insight and opinion.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make that change.
-Michael Jackson

57 7th (calstars), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Ironic that Michael Jackson didn't even write that song

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Gah, just wrote a lengthy answer only to have this thing die on me.

OK, it's not the stereotypical new-ager types who get me, it's everybody. Everybody who thinks that there is something more, and deeper and more meaningful. It's a blind that I feel prevents most people from actually achieving anything that you seem to be striving for. Official bodies of spirituality - churches etc - negate any good that they may do by creating division and restriction, external hatred and self-loathing, while personal odysseys tend to be just as indulgent and self-centred as spending all of your time collecting records.

Yes, it would be amazing to have every person devote some time to helping their fellow humans, but I don't see why you feel that music is stopping them from doing this, and I really don't understand why anyone would feel that it is more preventative than anything else (but I guess you're arguing about everything else as well?).

emil.y (emil.y), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Official bodies of spirituality - churches etc - negate any good that they may do by creating division and restriction,
Not for those who belong to a church. And not everyone who goes to church is a right-wing fundamentalist. And who said spirituality had to have an official body anyway?

57 7th (calstars), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not even a matter of filling a void. Sometimes it's a matter of making it possible to go on.

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I tried to write a post but ended up going in about 10 different directions at once. What a complicated subject! Maybe I'll clean it up and post it later, but for now I'll just say that I find the following quotes to be pretty much OTM w/r/t music being more than base/physical/braindead (thinking of TV specifically with that last one) pleasure:

but music itself is a spiritual, mental, social or intellectual pleasure more than a physical one

I think that many people reject the spiritual because it is not easily quantifiable or explainable, and it leads to ideas that are buttressed by more by vague and undefinable feelings more than articulable concepts, which leaves a funny taste in our logical minds, and also many of us have associative issues with spirituality (i.e. seeing flakey "spiritual" new agers with power crystals in SUVs). Nevertheless, I think it's important, and something that's easily overlooked or pushed to the side without being given its fair due because of its elusive nature.

sleep (sleep), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you mean by spirituality?

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not even a matter of filling a void. Sometimes it's a matter of making it possible to go on.

It seems like the same thing to me. After all, feeling like you can't go on suggests that you are experiencing a lack of something you need or want.


What do you mean by spirituality?

It is difficult to define, as it defies articulation, particularly in a manner that doesn't sound schlocky. I won't even try, but I'm pretty sure that it's a concept we can all understand without a strict definition.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you provoke people to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived reactions?

sreeni, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad to see some of the questions I raised being addressed in spite of all the bullshit.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you provoke people to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived reactions?


Sreeni, your wiseass quip implies that I'm trolling, which I am not. I'm asking for some feedback and opinions of other people who might share some of my feelings about this, and judging from some of the response, there are some people who are interested in discussing this. If you don't want to answer in a meaningful way, you don't have to; there are plenty of other threads that might be more your cup of tea.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)


Terming it a wiseass quip is good deflection, but I remain curious as to why discussion is so important to you? Important enough to kill, going by one of your, hopefully jocular, posts upthread. That kind of zeal reminds me awfully strongly of something that did penetrate my music-soaked fog. Oh yes, the headlines!

sreeni (sreeni), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

People use the term "spirituality" in varied enough senses that I'm not sure I understand how it's being used here. I think one thing that's always a bit of a stumbling block to me about the word is the embedded "spirit" in it; which always leaves me wondering if the speaker/writer is committed to a belief in a spirit. (I'm a fundamentalist agnostic by confession, but more secularist/naturalistic/materialist, in the metaphysical sense, than not.)

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

People use the term "spirituality" in varied enough senses that I'm not sure I understand how it's being used here. I think one thing that's always a bit of a stumbling block to me about the word is the embedded "spirit" in it; which always leaves me wondering if the speaker/writer is committed to a belief in a spirit. (I'm a fundamentalist agnostic by confession, but more secularist/naturalistic/materialist, in the metaphysical sense, than not.)

Fair enough. I suppose it means the part of consciousness that eschews the physical and material in exchange for the intangible and mental. But still, that seems reductive.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Official bodies of spirituality - churches etc - negate any good that they may do by creating division and restriction,

Not for those who belong to a church. And not everyone who goes to church is a right-wing fundamentalist. And who said spirituality had to have an official body anyway?

But in that sentence I conceded that there is some good in these official bodies, ie charitability, community etc. This is still negated by what is taught, namely that you are right and Godly or holy or about to transcend. This is taught even in liberal churches. Plus, those churches that attempt to modernise are merely displaying their own irrelevance. AND, if you read the whole of what I said, you may notice that I didn't even imply that these were the only paths of spirituality, I made a somewhat facile distinction between official bodies and personal journeys.

I suppose it means the part of consciousness that eschews the physical and material in exchange for the intangible and mental.

But then surely you're rejecting the physical efforts of people to help those who are in desperation/a less fortunate position than yourself in favour of navel-gazing? Which lends favour to my anti-spirituality judgement, as well as marking your dismissal of music as an oddity, seeing as music, to me, is part of the intangible and mental side of oneself.

emil.y (emil.y), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, let me try to sum up how I feel about this without being a twat again.
I haven't followed music in the way King Korn Carn describes since I was about 16 years old. I still listen to music everyday and own about 600 CDs, I just don't obsessively scour fanzines trying to seek out obscure gems, etc etc. I am a musician, so music is a priority in my life and always will be, even if my indie fanboyism has waned. If I do indeed have a true purpose and meaning in my life, I'm quite sure that music is it. I can understand the idea that there's more to life than music, of course there is, but that doesn't make it any less important to me. I don't see it as some great epiphany, just part of growing up.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

But then surely you're rejecting the physical efforts of people to help those who are in desperation/a less fortunate position than yourself in favour of navel-gazing?

Not at all; you are reading my words very literally, as if an adherence to the spiritual necessitates a complete and total rejection of the physical, including mental and spiritual action that manifests itself in physical action. Who would argue that a guy who sits in his room all day thinking is-- grrrr- "more spiritual" (i would like to avoid this term from hereon out) than someone who is doing physical labor to help people? Not me, anyway. But now we're getting into philosophical areas that hinge on semantic reasoning...

I'd like to redirect the discussion to some more personally contemplative issues and observations regarding our habits, rather than arguments regarding the validity/invalidity of MY feelings or comments exclusively. I'm not trying to get psychoanalyzed here; it's more like Musiholics Anonymous, where I'm trying to elicit responses from everyone on your own observations about your music habits and their relationship to your beliefs and the larger picture of reality.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i listen to music because i like it. unconsciously...what that saying about music being food for emotion? i only skimmed through your post but to an extent i understand what your saying, i remember esp. in my early/pre teens digging through records//cds and half the time coming back with a load of shit, but that was a bygone era before i had internet access. i think all this is just part of being into something, you develope an understanding of music through listening to it and expanding your musical taste, everynow and then this can lead to becoming extremely disillusioned and tastes drift into the obscure, until you feel uncomftable and eventually come back to liking music because , well, you like it. umm...actually maybe i dont understand what your trying to say, half the time i read the threads on these boards and its just like everybody here overanalyses EVERYTHING.

sphere, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)

everybody here overanalyses EVERYTHING.
YES, OTM

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

What is it to overanalyze?

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

WWWVOQD?

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is fucking stupid from the word go. No offense, KKC.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is fucking stupid from the word go. No offense, KKC.

Again, I never said that you HAD to answer it. I naturally (obviously rather naively) assumed that only people who connected or somehow could relate to what I was saying would respond. but alas, this is the internet, and every asshole with fingers has to get their word in, regardless of whether they have anything significant to contribute or not.

and without getting too uppity here, you might think it's stupid, but i feel like it's not only relevant, but also more important than what's on Ashlee Simpson's IPod. Of course, that is an opinion, and I don't think less of anyone who contributes to that thread. everything is relative. this may not be an important issue for anyone else but me, but that's the nature of human opinion; it runs the gamut on every issue known to us as a species. that's nothing new.

...But I was hoping to see some honest and heartfelt response to what I was talking about, and I thank those of you who did talk about it. I'm sorry that the negative flames had to enter the picture because, even they could be stated in a way that would have addressed the question by stating a lack of relation, rather than being dismissive of me for asking.

And regarding "overanalysis"-- I know what you are talking about. There are many areas of our lives that don't require analysis that somehow get it anyway like: "what did it mean when that girl said 'hi'? did it mean she liked me??", and many areas of theoretical philosophy and metaphysics that aren't applicable in anyone's real life... but is it overanalysis to examine one's own behavior and the thought processes that drive one's behavior every single day of one's life? I don't think so. If I didn't do it, I might as well be a robot because I'd be on autopilot 24/7, and going through my life without thinking about anything regarding myself and my behavior, and why I act the way I do, why I don't live up to my own moral/ethical standards, and so on. Surely you can all at least relate to that. It's that part of me that is asking this question.

"An unexamined life is not worth living" - Socrates

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't actually have fingers. I'm a double amputee and have to use voice recognition sofware.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)

"software". The technology has not yet been perfected.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I know some of you probably think this is some attempt at a "high brow" thread, but it's really not meant to be. Somehow these complex concepts start creeping in once you stop focusing on Britney's bra size and start talking about yourself, but it's really a simple thing I'm asking about.

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Simple is putting it mildly.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:00 (twenty-one years ago)

"The only true knowledge consists in knowing that you know nothing" -Socrates, by way of Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, you pompus prat.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"Like sand through the hour glass, so are the days of our lives."

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"pompous", damn this voice recognition software.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe you just need your mic checked or something dude.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

All we are is dust in the wind, dude.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Could an asshole with fingers wipe itself? That would be rather convenient.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"Love is a battlefield."

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Death is but a door, time is but a window. I'll be back!"

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Socrates would appreciate this thread if not the barbaric language for the method by which it provokes the snide disclosure of sore points. "I spend a million dollars a year on music but I don't think about it too much." Bullshit. "This is simple." Sure it is. Repression of sharing heartfelt motivation stems from repression of expressions of sexual frustration. What is the main subject matter of most blues, rock, and pop songs? "Why doesn't my baby love me?" What then inevitably is the set of imagery we entertain at least part of the time listening to this music? Our own romantic frustrations. Nick Hornby may have incorporated this line of thinking into High Fidelity but it doesn't make it any less valid. I bet a correlation could be charted between the onset of interest in the opposite (or same if you're gay) sex and pre-adolescent musical interest. Even if people find mates the erotic momentum behind the musical interest continues, particularly in those people settling and deep down inside dreaming of the perfect prince/princess.

do the sublimation, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"Someday, when you are the father of a small Puma Man, take him to the temple in the Andes Plateau. I will teach him the powers."

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

You know, starting a thread on ILX and complaining about derailment, twattish comments and people not discussing the topic under the parameters you would like them too is kind of like cutting you hand and being upset that it bled. Especially in a thread such like this.
This topic is not worth discussing on any level KKK/KKC.
It's all in your head, get over yourself.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

ah grammar, thou hast failed me

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I find the very premise of this thread highly insulting, in case you couldn't tell.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

To answer the question originally posted.

Probably. But it also helps to set my soul free sometimes, when I hear a soulful refrain, or a wash of anguished feedback, or the click clack of a little mirohouse my soul feels a bit less constrained and I like that.

hector (hector), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I find the very premise of this thread highly insulting, in case you couldn't tell.

i hesitate to fuel your seething adolescent rage, but why is this thread insulting to you? and why do you continue to post all these angry and negative comments on a thread that you don't relate to?

King Korn Carn, Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Read what you wrote, smart guy. You have an overinflated sense of self-importance to beat the band.

all this ultimately disposable music was a method for me to distract myself from finding true purpose and meaning in my life.

it often seems sad and inexcusable that it's easier for me to get excited and passionate about some stupid CD than events that affect the wellbeing of the human race, and the world at large.

how do you justify the way you spend your time? does the commodification of music undermine its ultimate goals to the human spirit? do you see any hypocrisy in the amount of time you spend on music and your political beliefs?

i feel like one of the big points for me in how i spend my time is that i want to grow as a person when i do things, and unless i have some sort of dialogue with my media, or create media by myself, it is ultimately somewhat useless to me in the long run.

Although these things might complement or enhance our lives, I eventually came to the conclusion that focusing on them as a major part of my daily life was doing an injustice to my limited time on this earth, and moreover was causing me to, in a way, de-evolve.

i've sort of rediscovered musical pleasure in folk music from around the world, which has a certain stripped down and spiritually purposeful 'soul' to it that i now feel is rarely observable in most commercially produced music. but even this is a very minor pleasure i take, and where music used to be my life, it is now only a subtle footnote. i mostly just enjoy the silence

ANSWER ME OR I'LL KILL YOU

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

stop trolling, please. if you don't want to talk about the subject you don't have to.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Disagreeing with you is not trolling, fascist.
Please explain to me how the above statements by you aren't completely ridiculous if you think about them even for a second.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. Sorta.

Sansai, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Aaron, you've made your point, now put your pants back on and leave the thread. Find something better to be annoyed by.

Will post on the subject in a moment, have definitely been thinking a lot about this.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Disagreeing with you is not trolling, fascist.

But you've already made it clear that you don't agree, Aaron. So now you're:

1) no longer contributing anything significant
2) engaging in harrassment
3) being aggressive and hostile
4) making pointed personal attacks

which basically means that you're trolling. Anyway, this will be my last post to you because it is clear that you are seeking negative attention, and my speaking with you is bringing down the quality of discourse, and causing an atmosphere of hostility and negativity. But your points are acknowledged, and I thank you for sharing your opinion. I'm sorry that we were unable to speak to each other at an adult level, Aaron.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Fine, I'm sorry if this thread is beyond any sort of levity. I'm gonna go think of songs that Ashlee Simpson might have on her iPod.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:44 (twenty-one years ago)

would like to hear your thoughts milton. I notice that a lot of the music you seem to regard has a rather spiritual quality to it.

By the way From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors using the word facist to end a sentence is a little overkill.

Kinda reminds me of those goth kids on south park.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I know!
If anyone was taking me seriously, I am sorry.
I was trying to provide a needle for a balloon, as the Flaming Lips would say.
I'm not seeking negative attention and will no longer post on this thread unless addressed.

From a Land of Grass Without Mirrors (AaronHz), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)

What about just to relieve boredom or kill time? Some people watch TV or read about stocks.

steve hise, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 01:35 (twenty-one years ago)

It's funny, I've sometimes, in my cynical moment, thought that all music, books, good food, etc. are just cultural "products" or "commodities" that we consume and that give us nothing more than fleeting pleasure. But then right now I'm reading a novel that I'm finding so enriching that I actually think it is changing my life, not in that BS "I understand the meaning of life now" way, but in an important therapeutic way. I'd guess that music has the same power to some extent, but maybe in a less concrete way. I also find that classical and jazz or any complex and challenging music really stimulates my mind and helps keep me sharp.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

[goatse.cx removed -- admin. p.s., ew!]

THANKS AND GOODNIGHT

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

jon you could have spent that time pissing on your father's face and it would have been far more helpful, after all, it's his fault

I've been very concerned about my listening habits for the last two years as they've gotten entirely out of control. when I come home, I'm not comfortable until I've got the CD player running, almost like someone heading for the liquor cabinet before they've taken their coat off. A mid-thirties thing, I'm lucky it's not actually alcoholism (someday you'll understand, jon williams).

Two points, one: fear narcotics. If you find yourself listening to music that does nothing but make you turn inward, then moderate your intake. Painkillers are great but make sure what you're listening has more of a point than total blissout.

Secondly: There no room for politics in absolute music but I don't think it's a mistake that my musical tastes have drawn me towards people who share and sometimes influence my political beliefs, once I learned what they were through research.

Most people in the world do not own stereos. A friend of mine just retired from managing an insanely successful independent record store because she was sick of enabling consumer escapism; she's volunteering with political websites now and I admire her flexibility. It hit me really hard. I want to stay entirely focused on listening & playing music. But I'm aware that may not be an option for too much longer.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

yikes you are scaring me.

I think you may have interpreted your "dependence" on music a little harshly.

Having had some experience with being debilitated on narcotics I can understand the appeal of the music metaphor.

However.

Music can be so much more than mere escapism. It is ephemeral art that you can share with your friends, discuss, be intellectually stimulated by, and use to inspire yourself with.

I have recently begun a program of limiting my music intake by several degrees of magnitude. With a new child we simply do not have the money to sustain my endless music lust. I am finding it not as bad as I thought though. I am able to listen with more depth to the things I do have, which makes me happily remember the high school days of only owning a few cassettes that I played endlessly. Also i am able to recapture that time I felt I was losing to my record shopping.

Music can be addictive, but in a world of endless choices of addiction it seems relatively benign. By the way good luck to your friend working with politics but that is a far worse jones to kick than music.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh and can we get a moderator to kill that goatse pic. Makes this thread totally fucking un worksafe.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)

YOU ARE THE DUMBEST FUCKER EVER

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the goatse pic and think it should stay on the thread

cute girl at a party the other night, I guess that she's from Russia before she tells me her name is Natasha, so that's good, she actually pulls off wearing shoulder length gloves, she's insanely sharp. so what do I do? within thirty seconds I'm talking about how the invention of equal temprament choked off polyphonic chant just as it was about to get interesting. she says 'uhm sorry english is my second language could you repeat some of that' and I just look at her and say 'ANIMAL DESPAIR'

it didn't work too well as a pickup line, so back to my perotin CD

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.pratique.fr/net/softs/mac/gif/jpeg.gif

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

耕ちゃんの「あそびってなんや」No.1
遊びを語る前にどうしても語っておかなければならないことがあります。
それは伝承、つまり人から人へと受け継いでいくものが今の時代は、
大きく崩れ去ろうとしているということです。
私は、もしかすると伝承の最たるモノ=言語という文化の源にもなるものが
すでに壊れ始めているのではないかという危惧を抱いています。
遊びは文化です。その文化を創っていく源、
コミュニケーションをとる中で文化が=遊びが生まれてくるわけですが、
その源である言語が怪しい時代になってきました。
それは、今の子どもたちは生の肉声や生の肉体表現よりも、
メディアの声や音、映像にふれる機会が多すぎるため、
現実の肉声の持つまさに現実感、健康状態や精神状態によって異なる微妙な音のれ、
生のリズム感を充分味わうことなく、メディアからの音を多く聞いてしまいます。
それが、保育や教育といわれる現場でもこれでもかという具合に垂れ流されます。
人の表情、それに伴う発声、又それに伴った心情が充分に読みとれないような
保育や教育の現場は、まず疑ってかかった方がいいと言えます。
幼児期にこれらの課題が充分に家庭や保育教育の現場でやられない以上、
そのことをさらに上の年齢まで積み重ねて行くという意味からも、
学校の現場なんかでも一クラス30人でも多いくらいです。
せいぜい多くて20人です。遊びの世界でもそうでした。
私たちの子供の頃は必ず地域の中に子ども集団というのがありました。
それは誰が作ったというわけではなく、何となく出来てきた子ども集団ですが、
20人もいませんでした。一人一人の表情、心情がまさに読みとれるような
人数構成だったと思います。きっと何処でもそうでしょう。
学校の現場のような多人数の子ども集団は、
地域の自然発生的な子ども集団ではなかったと思います。
それは多人数では、遊びという文化を伝承できなかったからだと
昔の子どもたちはわかっていたのだと思います。
言い方をかえれば文化としての遊びを気持ちよくやれる人数の限界を
感覚でわかっていたのではないでしょうか。
遊びは文化だという観点から、今後遊びのことを語っていきたいと思います。
そうすると今の遊び、たとえばファミコンなどがどうかというのは見えてきます。
というわけで第一回はここまで・・続きは次号で・・・・

耕ちゃんの「あそびってなんや」No.2
地域集団で子どもたちが遊ぶとき、一人一人としゃべるときのしゃべり方や
距離の取り方を無意識のうちに変え、相手との関係を瞬時に判断しながら変えていく
しなやかさを身につけ、集団と個を経験で認識し、集団の中での自分を生かす道筋を
知らず知らずにつけていくという果実が生まれるわけですが、
その果実こそが他人とのコミュニケーションの基礎となっていくわけです。
このおいしい果実を食べないで過ごしてしまう子どもたちが、
オートメーションによる製造物のように製造されているのが今日の子どもの状況と
言えるでしょう。もちろん充分家族とも交わらなければいけないわけですが、
今はそれさえも難しい時代になってしまいました。家族とも交わらないということは、
個の確立(人格の形成)が充分なされない可能性があります。
個の確立が充分なされないままファミコンなどの浸ってしまうのは、
自慰行為を進めているようなもので、非常に危険です。そればかり他と交わり
切磋琢磨する時間と奪いかねません。出来るならば個がしっかりと確立するまでは
そういう文化に浸らないようにさせたいですが、「そうもいかない」と言う声が
聞こえてきそうです。ファミコンは日本の生んだ優れた文化の一つですが、
人格が充分形成されないうちにそれを与えることは、
ファミコンの中の世界がその子の人格に刻み込まれる可能性があることを
親は認識しなければなりません。「子どもはいつの時代も変わりない」
と思っていましたが、最近はその考えを改めなければいけないと
出会う子どもを見て思います。個の確立が充分なされない子どもが多いことを
特に最近感じます。
子どもたちのしゃべる言葉の中から、少し前には「てにをは」の助詞が消え、
今「ぼくが」「私が」主語が消えようとしているのです。
「ぼくは○○ちゃんと○○する。」と5歳ぐらいになったら普通はしゃべることが
出来るのですが、それが出来ない子が結構目立ちます。
それはとりもなおさず自分自身の認識が出来ていないことを表すのですが・・
続きは次号で

耕ちゃんの「遊びってなんや」NO.3
 私が子供の頃、遊び集団の中には必ずボスのような役目の子がいて、
みんなを仕切ると同時に私たちの面倒も見てくれていました。
もちろん彼は良いことも悪いことも教えてくれたのですが、
彼のその卓越した能力に羨望のまなざしを向けていたのは
私だけではありませんでした。遊びの中での彼の行為は、
全て無償の行為であり、当然彼がやっていたことは、
いつしか私たちもするようになっていきました。
 まさに遊びの中での文化の継承を行っていたのです。
自然派生的に出来たあそび集団の中で、
生きるための目標となるべき人間像をつかみ取っていたわけです。
ところが今はその目標が持ちにくい時代です。
親の生き生き働く姿を見てなければなおさら、
目標となるべき人間像は自分の内側から消滅し、自分が何者かわからず、
ただ浮き世を浮遊していくだけの人間になってしまいます。
解決するには、なにより遊び集団の復活しか方法はないのですが、
その課題を克服するべき大人たちが、もうすでになるべき人間像を
見失っている人が多いですから、解決には相当の困難が予想されます。
遊び集団に変わる、無償の行為の中で育つ環境が今まさに必要なのです。
 今日、劇場や文庫、そういった運動がそれらのことに気づいた
お母さんたちの手で根付いてきました。
それらはまさに遊び集団に変わる無償の行為を保証してくれる場所なのですが、
前記のような理由でこの運動も現在継続しにくい状況が生まれています。
運動に関わる人たちには、自分たちのやっていることの意味を再確認してもらって、
「がんばれ」とエールを送り続けたいと思います。
 次回からは遊びの具体的な中身について書きたいと思います。
人形劇団とんと 前田耕一
2000年3.27

あそびってなんや.4
遊べない若者が最近増えています。
そのほとんどが乳幼児期に遊びの礎が出来ていないことが原因です。
子どもの遊びに欠かせない最も身近で、最も欠かせないおもちゃがあります。
それは、人間のからだです。
その中でも最も優れたおもちゃが手と顔です。
手と顔があれば、数限りない遊びが出来ます。
赤ちゃんは親の手の感触と声によって、
安心感と同時に遊び(文化)の礎を得ることになります。
「いないいない、ばあ」は手と顔によって成り立ちますが、
赤ちゃんにとっては、その所作が遊びの第一歩です。
赤ちゃんには繰り返しやってあげると、本当に喜びます。
「いない」という言葉の意味は解っていなくても、
「いない」が顔を隠すのだとわかると
今度は顔が見える瞬間を期待するようになります。
親の顔が見えたときの表情は、この上なく至福の顔をしてます。
「いないいない」の言い方の工夫で、
顔が見える瞬間への期待感を膨らませることができます。
「い・な・い・い・な・い」と一音一音切ったり、
「いないいない」を速く言ったり、またおそくいったり、
抑揚を付けたり、平板に言ったり、
「ばあ」の前に間を入れたり、
「ばあ」を可愛く言ったり強く言ったり、
「ばあ」をのばしたり詰めたり、
「ばあ」の瞬間の顔の表情はおよそ未知数に変えられますので、
そのバリエーションは限りありません。
世の中にこれほど優れているおもちゃは他にありません。
人間のからだ以上に優れたおもちゃはないと思うのですが、
このことを手抜きして既成のおもちゃを次々に与えてしまう風潮は
戒められるべきです。
なぜならそれら既成のおもちゃのほとんどの文化性が
人間のからだの持っている文化性より大きく劣っているからです。
もっとも使う人次第ですが・・・。

人形劇団とんと 前田耕一


あそびってなんや.5
からだと言うおもちゃを使った遊びと同時に、
いろいろな物をおもちゃとして使ってほしいのですが、
その物というのは時には土遊びの土であったり、
木や紙であったり布であったり、
つまり形になる前の素材でたくさん遊んでほしいものです。
その中でも幼児期には土遊びを飽きるほどやってほしいと思います。
土の感触は、晴れが続いたあとと雨上がりでは全く違いますし、
その感触はさわってみなければわかりませんし、
土の地面をほじくり返して、
中から石っころが出てくるととってもうれしいものです。
ありの巣やミミズなんか見つけるともっと嬉しいですね。
石っころやミミズを見つけることは、子供にとっては発見する喜びなのですが、
土の中にはいろんな物が埋まっているという可能性を開くことにもなります。
土に生えている草をほじくり返して、
ながーい根っこを見つけるとまたまた嬉しくなります。
一個発見するとするとあっちこっち掘りたくなります。
掘って一つ発見して、また次を掘る。いくら掘っても飽きません。
掘った穴に雨が降って水がたまると、また違った遊びのキャンバスになります。
水の中に指を突っ込み、
全部はいるとどのくらいはいるのか確かめるように腕全部を水の中に。
泥水だと自分の手が全く見えなくなります。
小さい子はこれが面白くてたまりません。
出したり入れたり何度でも楽しめます。
底の方はどろどろになってまたたまらない感触です。
土の感触、土の状態が水気によって変わっていく様、
土の中に根っこが生えていること、土の中にいる動物、
そして土と関係するありとあらゆる物に目が行き、
やがては・・・・・その土の上に立つ自分や人間社会(と少しオーバーですが)
そういったことを感覚的にからだで憶えていくわけです。
土との関係を感覚で憶えます。
やがて中学、高校と勉学する机上の科学と連鎖的に結びつき
生命の連鎖を感覚的に体得出来るのですが、
汚いと言ってこういうことをやりたがっているのにやらせない親は、
発達の目をつぶしていると自覚しなければいけません。
もっとも安心してほじくり返す地面がないことが
最も憂うべき事なのですが・・・

土を触ると言うことは地球を触ることなのです。
(続く)

 戻る

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

遊びってなんや6
歴史的に長い年月を経ても残っているおもちゃ
たとえば独楽や剣玉、ビー玉、お手玉、あやとりなどの
伝承遊びと言われているものや、
ままごとや人形あそびなどの人間の歴史が始まって依頼ずっとやられいているもの、
鬼ごっこやかくれんぼなどの身体を使った普遍的で
世界中でやられているようなもので充分遊び込んでほしいものです。
今の子どもたちは何よりもこのことが足りません。
「我慢強くない」という論調があちこちに出没しますが、
確かにそういう面があると思いますが、ぼくは違うと思います。
全く物がない時代ではないので、
子供にだけ「我慢しろ」と言っても
そもそも我慢してない大人が周りに大勢いるのに
「我慢が足りない」なんて、なんの説得力も持ちません。
充分に遊び込んでないことが、可能性を切り開く礎を作り切れてない
原因のような気がしてなりません。出来るまでやってみる、
違う方法でやってみるという経験が乏しく物事に対する粘りがありません。
遊んで遊んで遊び込む経験による工夫、根気、創造力という副産物が
全く身体に宿っていません。
ゲーム機器による遊びなら遊び込んでると誰かが言うかもしれません。
ゲーム機器は、パチンコと同じで、息抜きにはなるでしょうが、
やらないことによるストレスやまたは達成出来ないことによる
ストレスが常にかかる物だと思います。
充分に現実感覚が備わっていないこどもが早期からこれらの
遊びしかしないことが、多くの弊害を生み出すことは自明の理でしょう。
こまのおっちゃんという遊びの達人のような人がいます。
普通に回すのから始まって、手のせ、指のせ、頭のせ、ひもかけ、ちょんがけ、
イヤリング、技を次から次へと生みだし、その可能性は無限大だと言います。
私も向こうを張っていろいろ修得しましたが、
あのような人は実は昔は地域地域にいました。
つまり地域の中に子供の遊びの文化がしっかり根付いていたのです。
いま本当に子どもたちに必要なのは遊びの文化の再構築だと思います。
そして地域に遊びの達人を生み出すことです。
top

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

[explicit advertisement for "oriental transsexuals" removed. so sorry! -- admin]

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.nashville.k12.tn.us/CurriculumAwards/rural_urban_life/cindy2.jpeg

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.gold-software.com/webcolor.gif

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

ok that one's good

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

[animated gif of transsexual activity removed. -- admin]

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't imagine that gif happening without the help of a director asking the guy on the bottom to time his thrusts.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:28 (twenty-one years ago)


Synchronization is the process where two or more systems interact with each other and come to move together. Biology abounds with examples of synchronization: cells in the heart beat together, audiences often applaud together, fireflies in South-East Asia flash in synchrony, cicada emerge together, etc.. The earliest known scientific discussion of synchronization dates back to 1657 when Christian Huygens built the first working pendulum clock. Huygens studied systems of two pendulum clocks mounted on a common base. He observed that the clocks would swing at the same frequency and 180 degrees out of phase. This motion was robust, after a disturbance the synchronized motion came back in about half an hour. Huygens spent some time exploring this curious phenomena. Today, synchronization is a fundamental theme in nonlinear phenomena and is currently a popular topic of research.

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't imagine that gif happening without the help of a director asking the guy on the bottom to time his thrusts.

gives new meaning to the term, "ridin' spinnaz"

Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Just answer the question, guys. Do you listen to and follow music to fill a void in your soul that you perhaps unconsciously believe can only be filled by material or externally derived pleasures? Yes or no.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:43 (twenty-one years ago)

name 1 internally derived pleasure

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

YES OR NO, boredoms fan

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)

there is no such thing as an externally derived pleasure.

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:47 (twenty-one years ago)

s/externally/internally/

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Crapflooding is totally kewl. Seriously though? Seriously though guys seriously. Totally.

To (finally) answer the question: yes, in a way, with the caveat about regarding music as a "material pleasure" that has been mentioned far above.

sleep (sleep), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

YOU ARE THE DUMBEST FUCKER EVER!

YEA!

Thanks for reaffirming that for me! At least being dumb means I have better things to do with my time than flooding a bulletin board with crap.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"cute girl at a party the other night, I guess that she's from Russia before she tells me her name is Natasha, so that's good, she actually pulls off wearing shoulder length gloves, she's insanely sharp. so what do I do? within thirty seconds I'm talking about how the invention of equal temprament choked off polyphonic chant just as it was about to get interesting. she says 'uhm sorry english is my second language could you repeat some of that' and I just look at her and say 'ANIMAL DESPAIR'

it didn't work too well as a pickup line, so back to my perotin CD "

You are just hanging out at the wrong bars.
Just try and look casual hanging out in the hallways of Cal Arts or another music school.
I know I dated a hottie that was a piano performance major that would have totally been up in your shit for that pick up line.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for reaffirming that for me! At least being dumb means I have better things to do with my time than flooding a bulletin board with crap.

-- hector (hector233...) (webmail), October 27th, 2004 1:14 AM. (hector) (later) (link)

139 older messages are hidden.

sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)

You said "Animal despair"?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The thread-starting post was a good question. I'm sorry that the thread went the way it did. (sigh)

I guess there's no point adding my two cents at this juncture.

Shit.

Lefty, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

woah shit, somehow i feel my post was responsible for this

sphere, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is 1/3 interesting and 2/3s shite. The really intriguing thing is that the people responsible for the 2/3s shite (Jon, Aaron, others) have also posted some very interesting things too ("name one internally derived pleasure" being Jon's best point, for example).

I suspect I may be suffering from keeping-up-fatigue, meaning that these days when I get home from work I am generally confronted by at least one Jiffy bag with a CD in it (thank you, person at EMI who likes Stylus), but I don't want to put the CD player on. Sometimes I dread choosing something to listen to. Sometimes I dread having to listen to something new that's arrived on spec. A lot of stuff gets a cursory glance at the PR sheet and is discarded into a pile without listening ("sublime Finnish sound-art inspired by the Aurora Borealis" ; "politically-aware Swedish trip hop"). A lot of other stuff that I know I wont get to review gets filed in with my other CDs and stuff with the intention to get it out later and actually enjoy it (Pet Shop Boys DVD). Some stuff gets listened to, reviled and reviewed and sold on promptly so I can buy another Fred Perry (Dirty Vegas!).

I barely seem to have enough time to listen to music I already know I like and have a relationship/dialogue with, let alone try and engage with stuff enough to establish new dialogues. I don't think I ever wanted to be a "professional appreciator", I just wanted to understand better why I love the stuff I love, how I can find new stuff that gives me the same feeling, but at the same time I'm wary of turning into Hornby by the time I'm 30. But the semi-regular existential panic (or, perhaps, near-constant degree of existential awareness brought into being by years of semi-regular existential panic) I live my life within means, I hope, that this wont ever happen. Because no matter how much I'd like to stop, and only ever listen to Talk Talk and Orbital and whoever else again and never buy another CD (I said recently, when asked how many CDs I owned, that I had "nearly enough", and am almost constantly contemplating, lately, getting rid of the ones I suspect I'll never wish to listen to again), I don't think i could do that.

What I need, like anyone with anything, is some degree of balance.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I used to think music was all, but this thread has taught me the true point of life is petty bickering.

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(Yes, really! See war, religion, soap operas etc.)

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

"...it's easier for me to get excited and passionate about some stupid CD than events that affect the wellbeing of the human race, and the world at large. and when i step back and read that, it seems horribly ludicrous, awful even."

But music is more interesting than 'the wellbeing of the human race', much of which seems to want to kill each other for money, oil, law or some stupid fucking God their forebears wished into existence to give their empty lives some point.

I'm not syaing people aren't important, but at some point you have to grow up and realise there are more important things than saving the world.

mei (mei), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

The topic of this thread has been buzzing on my head for the last couple of months... Myself, as a music consumer (as in BUYING music as well as listening to it), I gather more than I can listen to, because of my never-ending urge to listen to new stuff or to complete that artist's discography. Well, I've been thinking: if I really LOVE music, why buying and listening only to new records all the time instead of really enjoying the ones that "clicked" in the middle of all that shopping frenzy.

And the conclusion I came to is this: if I'm not shopping for used CD's or going to some CD fair or listening to anything on my 2ft.high "to listen" pile, or writing crap on a music forum somewhere, I don't know what to do! I try, but I can't find the same thrill in other things. I recently started doing some music photography and the casual review once in a while, but even so, it's hardly unrelated. It seems music has really got me addicted, in a way that I can't think about anything else.

I think it's time for me to get a girlfriend.
Quickly.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

KKK

I have experienced the same sentiments you are now expressing. For me, though, it wasn't music. It was something else. Later, like yourself, I tried to fill my void with an obsessive music hobby, which I still do today. I believe other people have tried to say (although in different words), that nothing will fill that void. Everything you place into it will be a temporary solution that will ultimately make no difference.

I believe that one of the only things that is truly universal "human nature" is the void. It's timeless as well and be witnessed in the oldest literature still available, and the subsequent failing search to satisfy the void. No matter, like teenagers, people have a tendency to think it is a phenomonen unique to themselves, their time, or their society.

It reminds me of this commercial I saw on TV once for some Church. It has some guy standing there saying, "Do you feel like something is missing in your life? You can't figure out what, but you can feel it? YOU NEED JESUS PRAISE ALLAH, etc." Although I'm sure that somehow convincing myself that I believe in Christian theology wouldn't be any more effective than music, it almost makes me want to try.

Welcome to being a semi-nihilistic. The first step is realizing that you're trying to fill a void in yourself with something that isn't working. The next step is accepting the fact that nothing will.

Mickey, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)

FUCK THE VOID

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Shit, I've reached the denial phase.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

And it's whispered that soon, if we all call the tune, then the piper will lead us to reason.

toothy philanthropist, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I cannot tell you how much happier and better-adjusted I feel now that I've rediscovered music as a pleasurable hobby rather than as a social tool. I was never really an adept a music scenester, even though I aspired to travel in those circles. Now that the pressure's off, I can seek out the new music I truly enjoy while not feeling guilty about just listening to old stuff for weeks.

mike a, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe that one of the only things that is truly universal "human nature" is the void. It's timeless as well and be witnessed in the oldest literature still available, and the subsequent failing search to satisfy the void. No matter, like teenagers, people have a tendency to think it is a phenomonen unique to themselves, their time, or their society.

That's a very interesting and astute point, Mickey. Perhaps it is this very thing that makes us do what we do. In fact, I'm almost sure it is. I think that filling this void is what all these musicians we love are trying to do with their music, all the scientists who push themselves and their technologies, all the activists, politicians, movie stars, writers, and everyday people like ourselves who find something to try and fill it... In fact, you might even say that the people who become famous and drive themselves to do great things are the ones who, ironically, are more cognizant of their void and feel more like they have to validate themselves somehow. In this sense, the void might be in some way equated with self-loathing, a sobering way of viewing the course of humanity throughout the ages.

Of course, the question is whether the void can ever be filled by anything. Like I said before, that void sometimes-- ever so fleetingly-- seems filled in my heart. I used to experience that feeling especially in music. I'd get lost in the words and melodies of music, and it would haunt and enchant my heart, but at some point, this feeling starting to wane. Yet, hundreds upon hundreds of albums kept coming out week after week-- so many, in fact, that I, like the other people who mentioned this point, panicked, and (wrongly) put the emphasis on getting the albums rather than listening to them closely, engaging in them, forming a dialogue, and growing with them. This was a process that never registered with me until I started questioning why I was losing interest in music despite the fact that my hard drive was getting larger and larger with MP3s (most of which I rarely, if ever, listen to!).

But now, even though I'm aware of my recent lack of effort in forming a dialogue with my music, I'm not entirely sure that it's beneficial for me to do it with any sort of the rabidness that I used to exhibit. Or to rabidly do anything for that matter. Like many of other people mentioned, I channeled a lot of my energy into making music, writing, and making art, that while they will probably not be appreciated by others, I feel is a good form of expression and growing within myself.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

would like to hear your thoughts milton. I notice that a lot of the music you seem to regard has a rather spiritual quality to it.

At the risk of bringing this conversation to a down-to-earth level :), what might this music be, Milton? I'm curious.

King Korn Carn, Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure what he meant by that really, I'm curious too.

this thread is missing something without the porn. perhaps we should start over on the noise board.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I thought a lot of the stuff you posted to an ambient thread seemed to be very ambient/floaty/spiritual.

and you posted a ton of it.

hector (hector), Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I suspect I may be suffering from keeping-up-fatigue

I thought this referred to the thread itself, momentarily.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm wary of turning into Hornby by the time I'm 30

That guy casts a long shadow over ILM.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I think what bugs me about some of the hand-wringing over music (or whatever other void-filling activity) is that we aren't really well-suited to just kind of doing nothing and becoming utterly free of the need for anything at all whatsoever, kind of the Buddhist ideal, it seems to me. Not really the doing nothing part, but the not needing to do anything (not needing to do nothing) part. And maybe that is the path to true freedom, but I don't find it very attractive. You can get to the point where anything you do could be viewed as some sort of attempt to gloss over your own impermanence, to prop up the illusion of ego (if you buy that sort of talk). I find that a bit tiresome. I find a naturalistic view that starts with the given of our being primates more helpful, actually.

Not that anyone was talking about Buddhism, but the sort of question asked at the start of this thread, pushed to its extreme, could point in that sort of direction.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Chogyam Trungpa, Andrew Weil. . .

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(Buddhism may have been presented as a "middle way" but that was only by comparison to the crazy ascetic shit that was going on in India at the time.)

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Songs with the word void in them:

Siouxsie and the Banshees: Love in a Void
The Raincoats: [I think they have a song with the word void in it, but I can't actually make out what they are saying in this case]

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a lot of music I would not have wanted to miss out on.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Thursday, 28 October 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG like LOL don't U just totally luv my new weblogg?

cdwill, Thursday, 28 October 2004 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not even a matter of filling a void. Sometimes it's a matter of making it possible to go on.

I think what I might have been thinking when I said this was: if I just stopped buying CDs (and maybe similar things) and attempted to focus on doing something about my problems (with my job topping the list), I think maybe I would just go under (i.e., suicide).

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 28 October 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

answer to original question:

yes.

cis (cis), Thursday, 28 October 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I think what bugs me about some of the hand-wringing over music (or whatever other void-filling activity) is that we aren't really well-suited to just kind of doing nothing and becoming utterly free of the need for anything at all whatsoever, kind of the Buddhist ideal, it seems to me. Not really the doing nothing part, but the not needing to do anything (not needing to do nothing) part. And maybe that is the path to true freedom, but I don't find it very attractive. You can get to the point where anything you do could be viewed as some sort of attempt to gloss over your own impermanence, to prop up the illusion of ego (if you buy that sort of talk).

Although you stated it properly above, I think your commentary is misleading of the Buddhist ideal. It speaks more to the idea that nothing NEEDS to be done, rather than nothing SHOULD be done. The difference is that one implies an attachment to an activity while the other implies a constant enjoyment of everything without a necessary fixation on [a] particular[s]. It's not meant to be a total rejection of the material, so much as a rejection of the attachment to the material. Perhaps to make a more concrete example, enjoying music without feeling that you need it; you can live with it, you can live without it. You can collect tons of CDs, thousands of them, and enjoy them all, but if the entire collection is stolen, you couldn't care less because you're still enjoying everything.

I find this philosophy very attractive, and in fact, I hope that it is a worldview that someday leaves its stamp on everything I do and feel. I want to enjoy the world, I want to take pleasure in everything, but I never want to feel like that my happiness is dependent on anything external.

King Korn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Nahmean?

King Korn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I like King Korn Carn very much.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 October 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

And I like you Sick Mouthy! You're one of the few regulars who seems interested in this subject. Also, if I recall correctly from reading your posts from over the past 2-3 years, you're a huge Stone Roses fan, as I am. I think you are also a Wu fan too, right? Or am I misremembering that?

King Korn Karn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Not a massive Wu fan, but I do like them, yes.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Then all is well in the world.

King Karn Carn, Thursday, 28 October 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
This thread could have been great. It also sowed the seeds for Soulseeking on Stylus. Hmmm...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:35 (twenty years ago)

Did you write Beowulf?

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)

Yes, he's been waiting for you to drop him a line for 800 years

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:50 (twenty years ago)

What was he doing for the first four hundred odd years?

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)

Pissed

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:55 (twenty years ago)

Ah.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

That's a LOT of urine.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

No, it's true, scout's honour

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)

Well when urine, it's difficult to get out.

Masked Gazza, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:58 (twenty years ago)

wots an 'internally-derived pleasure'?

N_RQ, Thursday, 6 October 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

six years pass...

This is an interesting thread. Well, except the stupid stuff posted by angry trolls. But I'm curious to hear how some of you who posted nearly 10 years ago feel about all this now.

Poliopolice, Sunday, 15 July 2012 01:21 (thirteen years ago)

Music doesn't replace love, family, friends. But it is basically one of the few things I view as justifying the existence of humanity more broadly. I am not a "spiritual" person, but I'm fairly convinced that whatever most people go into religion or spiritual exploration looking for, I find without trying in music. So while of course it can sometimes become merely a game--however enjoyable and valid as such--to search and find and share new musical discoveries, I believe it has added real meaning to my life. And in fact, the creation/sharing/appreciation of music brings us closer to what I take the original poster of this thread to mean are "more important"--other people. It's one of the things that really counters all of the "atrocities" that humans are capable of--because it proves that we're also capable of incredible and, as far as we know, uniquely human expressions of beauty and investment of meaning.

Unlike religion, architecture, even food--music also tends to have much less potential for destruction: even when we might say it's not very good art, if it moves people (physically, mentally, emotionally) and brings them closer to others (literally or figuratively) then it's still a positive achievement. It's one of the aspects of life without which I believe we merely survive--which has been humanity's lot, and may yet be again (perhaps soon). I don't question the impulse to take stock of ones approach to material acquisitions, etc., but one runs the risk of negating the very things that make life worth living just because they don't necessarily keep us alive.

Of course, I don't think about this stuff very often vis-a-vis music--I'd rather be happy that I'm in the right position in history, place, economics, whatever, to appreciate this distinctly human gift. It's amazing, and I'm never going to apologize for giving it a high priority in my life. Of course I won't be on my death bed withing I'd found that one elusive LP (or certainly wishing I'd listened to more indie rock) but I think I will be glad of the memories, associations, shared experiences, and continual joy of discovery that music gave me in my life, and thankful for the ways it connected me to the people I loved. It's part of who I am, all the geekiness is just part of the process--and I'll have no regrets.

Soundslike, Sunday, 15 July 2012 01:56 (thirteen years ago)

I forgot how much I loved Pro Wrestling for the nes.

bamcquern, Sunday, 15 July 2012 02:24 (thirteen years ago)

Sometimes when I hear a beautiful song or a beautiful story, I feel like I don't need anything else in this world. Sometimes these things seem like the only redeeming things about the world to me.

Poliopolice, Sunday, 15 July 2012 15:53 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.