I am positively drooling at the prospect of it being on a par with "Technique".
― Neil FC (Neil FC), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― rentboy (rentboy), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)
Let's also hope it's less bland than "Get Ready".
― Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― claremont, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 05:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Haha, I'm demented, as I kept reading that essentially as "Waiting, [Because] The Sirens Call" without the aprostrophe, which is stupid.
www.neworderonline.com says:
It's been rumoured that the reason why there is no apostrophe in "Sirens" is because the band couldn't agree where it should go, and Saville decided that there wouldn't be any.
But then...
will be called Waiting For The Sirens Call, except that they did add the apostrophe in "Siren's".
< / pedantry >
― Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)
by "dance-oriented" i'm hoping very much they mean it's a progression from here to stay, which was a blistering return to form and is really the last piece of hope on to which i cling. but i can't even force myself to actually get excited about this album, which is a tragedy.
and the missing apostrophe is fucking me off more than i can explain.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm in the "I'm glad that they're not making another rock-oriented album, but I wish they wouldn't try to immitate Technique either" camp.
I'll try to stay as open minded as possible.
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
oh, was that what get ready was meant to be?
:)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM. Trying to be artistic with apostrophes or lack thereof is not very clever or interesting the first place, let alone the fact it's been DONE before, countless times.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― BlastsOfStatic (BlastsofStatic), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
They are not waiting for a siren to call !
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)
oh, no, hang on. that didn't happen. fuck. leckie or street or some such past-it twiddler. since when did fucking new order need producers, eh?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)
BTW: NO completists may be interested in the shameless comp on my blog: stephenage.typepad.com
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
anyway you slice it, their just dum
― rentboy (rentboy), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Hurrah!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)
sorry, sorry. i'll stop now.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
So while it may sound contradictory given how much I like Get Ready, I am somewhat disappointed by New Order's 'comeback'. It's pretty clear that they are set on cruise control and not really willing to experiment and create *new* things any more. The live experience how is fairly shite - they seem content to trot through pre-programmed versions of all the big ones with Barney warbling along to an autocue. They don't even program their own stuff any more. For anyone who saw them anytime from 80-88, it's a pretty tame experience - they always used to fly by the seat of their pants and created great music that way, both live and in the studio.
What I'd love more than anything from them in 2005 would be a self-produced double album with some real risk-taking experimantation. Think Tago Mago. I shouldn't write off the new LP yet, but it won't be like this. One thing I agree with grimly fiendish about - I think Gill's departure saw some of the magic evaporate.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)
as for gillian: i argued long and hard on a.m.n-o about this. the wonderful, beautiful thing about new order was that they were more a gang than a band; they were four people who fought and hissed and spat at each other but still came together time and time again to make beautiful music. i still don't know exactly who played what on each song; and i don't care, because it doesn't matter. when one member goes from a group like that, the dynamic is destroyed.
what really galls me is that joy division became new order when ian died because they couldn't carry on as the same band without a key member. i'm sorry, but i can't accept hooky/barney/steve plus phil cunningham as new order, because by their own criterion it's a different entity. yes, ok, joy division was a long time ago ... but some standards should be kept, surely?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Listen to the guitar tones and album flow of Movement and Get Ready back to back and tell me there aren't similarities. The fact that you like one and dislike the other does not automatically make any positive comparison between them invalid; furthermore holding every New Order album up to the "redifine the parameters of sound" criteria is foolish.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:07 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm sorry: to these ears the guitars on movement sound like a frenzied maelstrom. the guitars on get ready sound like a sludgy mess. the songs on movement are paranoid and edgy. the songs on get ready are contented and fat. the electronics on movement are cold and sparking. the electronics on get ready are pro-tooled to a dull sheen.
etc.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― laticsmon (laticsmon), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
new order work best for me when they play with dance music, so this sounds good to me.
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Get Ready = Brotherhood IIRepublic = Movement IIWaiting for the Sirens Call = Technique II
Maybe the "Peter Saville Soundtrack" is "Low-Life II", on the basis of its similarities to "Elegia".
"Power, Corruption and Lies" is lonely.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
I am content. (Then again how could it be otherwise?)
is billy corgan going to be on this one? No? then it will be better than get ready.
You are evil, stinky and mean.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
**the electronics on movement are cold and sparking. the electronics on get ready are pro-tooled to a dull sheen. **
Yes. But such is the nature of making a record in 2003 vs 1981. I agree with the contented and fat comment.
I hope new guest 'stars' this time. They could hardly have chosen worse than the gurning fool Gilliespie and the clueless Corgan. At least Corgan didn't ruin the majestic Turn My Way with his braying.
I am a bit uncomfortable with holding subsequent albums up to the standard of Movement. For me it is their best, but really you can't compare any of them from Movement to Technique as their aesthetic was changing constantly and they were pushing forward with new technology and new ways to work. All are great, but different. In retrospect, maybe the rot set in with Republic - not wholly bad, but not the record of a pioneering band. It worries me that S. Hague is still involved.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)
even better title: "waiting for the call of the sirens"
What I'd love more than anything from them in 2005 would be a self-produced double album with some real risk-taking experimantation. Think Tago Mago.
Jesus H., Dave you make me swoon! If only it were true!
I would like to politely suggest that we get away from the idea of hoping for another Movement. Without Hannett around, and without them grieving the loss of their singer, there is just no WAY we are going to get another one of those. It's still my favourite album of theirs, I understand the sentiment, but really - "another Movement" just can't happen.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― major jingleberries (jingleberries), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm sorry all! Me and Barney can no longer tolerate working together. Maybe I would be persuaded if he asked me back.
If you are reading Bernard, I have something I want to say to you:
A cold that sleeps within my heartIt tears the earth and sun apartBut that's the way that I can winA victim of your evil sinYou've lost the hold you've had on meBy causing the changes that you never see
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 22 January 2005 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Damnit I need a bottle of champagne right now.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― jsk baby (jsk baby), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Peter Stringbender (PJ Miller), Saturday, 22 January 2005 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― bernard hook, Saturday, 22 January 2005 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― bernard hook, Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)
ok, ok. i admit. i am pathetically excited about hearing this fucking "krafty".
oh, that's a shock. the crappy R1 stream has just cut out on me. for FUCK'S SAKE
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
it's brotherhood-era NO all over again! happy, happy fucking day!
good god. that was really quite wonderful. wow. i wish i'd audio-hijacked it. or at least listened to it on proper speakers, not the laptop.
it's already stuck in my head.
fantastic. proper new order, doing what they're good at.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 22 January 2005 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)
yes.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Interesting you should mention that. There was a bit I think towards the end where they used some synth noise or something that made me immediately think "Brotherhood". And the BBC's radio player thing really does suck. I used to be able to use the buttons on it, too, like pause and skip ahead 5 min. but now none of the buttons even work. Once it's on I'm just stuck with it. And the sound quality is just...ugh. I've streamed from other places like WFMU and I swear it wasn't near that bad.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
wonder how well this song's propagating on P2P right now?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Seriously grimly, you've got to explain why you're freaking about this song and "Brotherhood" but still don't like "Get Ready".
Sonically, "Get Ready" = "Brotherhood"
OK, it's playing now!
That's an amazing track, probably better than all of the "Get Ready" singles. As for the "Brotherhood" comparisons, the melody during the verses reminded be of the chorus in "As It Is When It Was".
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm thinking. i'm trying.
there's a lightness and deftness about krafty that i just don't hear on get ready. the entire album sounds forced, lumpen, like it's made up of sewn-together pieces of songs; krafty sounds like it's burst fully formed from the new order song machine (which is a good thing, naturally).
there's a brightness and edginess about the brotherhood sound that i don't hear on get ready either. if i knew more about these things, i'd say it was all to do with dynamics, the space in the songs, but i can't explain that any further. all i can say is that the recordings on get ready sound dull, matt, dead ... and that brotherhood and krafty sound vibrant and chiming.
also: the melodies have a lot to do with it. krafty is classic new order (i mean, seriously, there were two points where hooky did exactly what i'd expect; predictable, yes, but in a joyous and life-affirming way), while get ready sounds like new order playing other people's rather tedious songs.
you know what's gonna happen now, don't you? i'm gonna love this and think the rest of the album's cack, heh. but woh, has this given me hope.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)
Summery even though this is not summer. :-)
It's Sumnery! Okay, that was bad.
Well, you see Crystal is my least fave track on Get Ready, so the phenomenon you speak of has certainly crossed my mind.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 22 January 2005 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 22 January 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― brontosaur, Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 23 January 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)
“WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL”
RELEASED 28TH MARCH 2005 THROUGH LONDON RECORDS
After the planet-shagging success of 2001’s “Get Ready” and 2002’s ‘this-is-how-you-do-it’ four CD boxset “Retro”, Manchester’s finest ever band, New Order, return with their new, hotly anticipated album, “WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL”. Showcasing New Order’s unique ability to both shake the dancefloor and rock the hardest, Sirens is that rare thing: an album for everyone. Its eleven songs take in influences as diverse as electro, rock, dancehall and punk, all bound together by New Order’s cool romance, diamond-hard modernity and wild, unparalleled musicality.
First single, “KRAFTY”, is bass-driven, machine-like, ridiculously catchy. The title track is wistful and sublime, considered by the band to be one of the best tracks they’ve ever made. Then there’s the perfect pop of “JETSTREAM’ (Bernard’s vocals augmented by Scissor Sister Ana Matronic); the wry, hilarious regret of “MORNING NIGHT AND DAY”; “I TOLD YOU SO”’s reckless ragga lope; the Iggy stomper “WORKING OVERTIME”; the anthemic, tuneful “ROAD TO RUIN”. “WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL” is the diverse, devastating, delicious sound of a great band at its peak.
This energetic, upbeat album was carefully recorded over seven months, using a ‘Who’s Who’ of producers, including Stephen Street, John Leckie, Stuart Price and New Order themselves. A sustained burst of song-writing by the band resulted in 18 completed songs, a first for New Order – Bernard: “We usually do just enough for an album, ten songs and it’s done”; the seven tracks left off “Sirens” are so strong that they are likely to form the basis of a future LP. Phil Cunningham, recruited as guitarist when New Order took “Get Ready” on the road, had the privilege of being invited by Bernard, Hooky and Steve to join the song-writing process for this new record. “I found it strange at first,” he says, “because New Order use a lot of technology. And sometimes they reject stuff because it sounds ‘too New Ordery’”.
“It’s the heart and the soul of New Order that’s important,” explains Bernard. “If something sounds like a pastiche, that’s not good enough.”
Rejecting the obvious has always been New Order’s technique: in their 28 year career, they’ve changed the face of pop music on more than one occasion. As Joy Division, they ripped up rock’s rule book by making music that was heavy and subtle, glacial, yet full of lament: “Love Will Tear Us Apart” has just been chosen as one of The Brits 25 best songs ever written. Then, as New Order, they were light years ahead of the dance scene with the world’s best-ever-selling 12” single “Blue Monday”, before bringing Madchester to the masses with the platinum-selling album “Technique”. As an aside, they made the only cool football anthem ever made, “World In Motion” – it went to Number One – as well as having hits with various side projects such as Electronic, Monaco and The Other Two.
The New Order legacy is undeniable, yet the band keeps coming up with more. “Waiting For The Sirens Call” is so packed with pop tunes, it sounds like a Greatest Hits. Bernard’s lyrics cover computers, hangovers, the folly of man’s lust - and even Dracula’s castle (a reference to St Catherine’s, the Jane Seymour-owned studio where part of “Sirens” was recorded). His voice has never sounded better, Hooky’s mournful, gorgeous bass twists throughout, Phil’s guitars add warmth and depth, and Steven’s drumming and looping show the imitators how it’s done.
There is no other band that unites both “spotty students and football hooligans” (Bernard), as well as housewives and rock stars, the art set and the mainstream, indie-lovers and dance nutters. No other band that can wring such emotion from machines, or make guitars sound so fresh. Noone else is so spiky, so startling, innovative and inspirational; noone else makes pop music for clever people that hits the heart as well as the head. In 2005, when every other up-and-coming band cites Joy Division and New Order as inspirations, it’s fantastic to have the real deal back – and on such blistering form.
TRACKLIST (with production credits)
Who’s Joe? (produced by New Order)
Steve: “It’s a nice uptempo number, along the lines of Guilty Partner and Dream Attack. It came quite easily, it was deposited on earth fully formed, a lovely baby. And it’s got a funny clangy noise in it. My speciality.”
Bernard: “It reminds me of Joy Division, it’s got that heaviness. Who’s Joe? Absolutely no idea. To me, it’s the story of a tramp.”
Hey Now What You Doing (Stephen Street)
Bernard: “It’s fresh. It doesn’t remind me of anything we’ve done before. I was thinking of a lad from Moss Side when I was writing the lyrics.”
Phil: “It’s got power and it’s instant. It came from my guitar riff idea, so I like it, and it’s quite easy to play.”
Steve: “It’s daring of Bernard to try rhyming future and computer. I admire that.”
Waiting For The Sirens’ Call (New Order)
Hooky: “Barney’s done really well with the vocals and the lyrics are really good. They’re about travelling, I think. It’s his yachting influence.”
Bernard: “It’s my favourite track. The backing track’s brilliant, Hooky’s bass is fantastic on it. It made me crap it a bit, because I thought, If I don’t get the vocals right, I’m going to destroy a classic song. I don’t know quite what’s it about. Could it be about death? Or infidelity. It’s not about me in particular.”
Krafty (John Leckie)
Hooky: “I was working with Hybrid, and wrote this middle bit of a track, and thought, That’s too good to leave there, I’m having that, so I asked them and they said, That’s fine. And it turned into Krafty. And it’s just great.”
Steve: “It started as a jam, a bit like Lonnie Donegan. But then we put electronic noises in there.”
I Told You So (New Order)
Bernard: “I was on holiday on my boat in the Caribbean, tuning in a shortwave radio into all these mad stations. The beats were fantastic, really interesting. So I recorded some stuff off the radio, and used it as the inspiration for a song. I like it because it starts off with these dancehall beats and then turns into Velvet Underground somewhere in the middle, and I like both of those things.”
Phil: “It’s bonkers, isn’t it?”
Morning Night And Day (Stephen Street)
Phil: “It reminds me of Primal Scream, the sentiment and the rocky Stones-y vibe. But it’s actually quite programmed.”
Bernard: “That one is autobiographical. It is definitely about my life. My life as it used to be. Actually, it’s about Phil’s life.”
Hooky: “Oh god. When you get to our age, the hangovers are so massive, they last for about a week.”
Dracula’s Castle (John Leckie)
Hooky: “That started as a jam with me, Phil and Steve.”
Bernard: “St Catherine’s, where this was partly recorded, was built by Henry VIII for one of his illegitimate daughters. It was a courthouse for a bit and I wrote lyrics in this room where people were judged and tried. It had an old fireplace, and was all lit by candles. It was a creative room but very spooky. That’s why Dracula’s castle is in there.”
Jetstream (Stuart Price)
Bernard: “I must admit I was a bit dubious when Ana Matronic was suggested as a singer, but she did a fantastic job, really lifted the song. We knew it was a good track, but it needed something that we couldn’t give it.”
Phil: “We were aware we had mainly rock tracks, so we consciously wrote something to dance to.”
Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Stuart Price)
Bernard: “A very difficult song to write, with a tortuous route to get to where it is now! I can’t categorise it, but loosly, it is a dance record. Get Ready had no dance tunes, which we were very aware of, especially after we toured that record in 2001. It’s important to keep the balance.
Hooky: “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”.
Turn (Stephen Street)
Hooky: “We wrote this when it was miserable and rainy, and we wanted to cheer ourselves up!”
Phil: “It’s very upbeat and summery”.
Working Overtime (Stephen Street)
Hooky: “I think this should be a single. It’s dead rocky. I play it when I DJ and people go mad.”
Steve: “I love this one because it’s based around my drum riff. It sounds a bit Stoogey, but it’s not meant to be. But most of music is thievery isn’t it? Sometimes I hear a song on the radio and think, This is good, is it one of ours? Then the red mist descends and I think, You robbing bastards!”
Bernard: “I was worried that things were getting a bit flowery and melodic and chordy, so it’s great to have a track like this, with a dumb one finger riff. You should never forget that the best music is simple and you don’t have to be a great musician to make it.”
INTERVIEW/BIOG WRITTEN BY MIRANDA SAWYER, Jan 2005.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 24 January 2005 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)
certainly, on the evidence of "krafty", i'm now really quite excited about this album. wonders, as they say, will never cease.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 24 January 2005 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh boy...
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 24 January 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Im surprised theres so many tracks the band produced themselves. even more reasons to be excited about downloading the album on or near 3/28 due to lack of US release date.
― Juan, the Magic Don (jingleberries), Monday, 24 January 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Look, I want to believe it as much as anybody, but this is how hearts are broken.
― Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)
New Order = not prolific.
We're lucky enough to have 2 records in 5 years, not this 2 in 1 year insanity.
― Juan, the Magic Don (jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)
Ah well. No doubt I'll learn to love it in the space of about a week.
― JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)
-- Juan, the Magic Don (still.beven...), January 25th, 2005.i'd rather have a brilliant cd every four years than a crap album every year (week) like elton john or prince in the 90's
― new waver, Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)
― Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
Also, his lyrics work better when they are more abstract or obscure. Two songs which are narrative in content, Love Vigilantes and All the Way, are the exceptions that prove the rule.
However, JimD is OTM re: Shine, which is prolly the best Monaco song.
― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
Also a funny note, several Americans I talked to, when they first heard the opening lines to "Crystal" thought that New Order were talking about how much they liked crystal meth!!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)
it gets better with each listen, that song, it really does. has anyone heard any other tracks? OMM were wanking on at the weekend about the one with ana matronic on it.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)
Miranda! I know you like NO, and that's a press release and all, but umm exaggeration?
Oh and isn't the new title a bit like "Standing on the shoulder of Giants" ?
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
― piscesboy, Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)
Didn't she compile one of the discs?
― kit brash (kit brash), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)
I was recently informed today by a co-worker that mostly 15 year old asian girls like new order. Imagine that shit. I was never told.
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 27 January 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)
http://www.neworderonline.com/Default.aspxNewOrderOnline Radio - Tonight at 8pm EST (GMT-5) / Tomorrow at 4pm EST (GMT-5)Today - 1:46:35 PM - Tune in tonight on Retroforward Radio for NewOrderOnline Radio.
You will be able to listen to the latest New Order interview, hear the latest news, listen to a few songs, and listen to a live show from Leuven 1985 in the second half of the show.
Don't forget to use the chatroom to interact with other listeners (chat room here and on Retroforward's website).
http://retroforward.com/radio/
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 27 January 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)
A few days ago I was THRILLED to learn that New Order are playing the Coachella festival in Southern California at the end of March. I was actually planning to take a trip down there sometime this spring and it seemed the perfect thing. I've actually never seen them even once in my life but had two near misses and had just resigned myself to the idea it was never meant to happen. Of course the fact that GANG OF FOUR are playing too is like having my cake, eating it, and having a second cake or something.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 06:52 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 27 January 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)
actually, the very notion of "tomorrow/today" becomes enormously confusing when you're trying to factor in a five-hour time difference.
and the website says the show's on wednesday night. so ... it was *this* morning GMT?
fuck it. has anyone/can anyone audio-hijack this and circulate it?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 10:43 (twenty years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
April 26 is the U.S. release date.
ONLY 50 million years after the UK date, as usual.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
I've never seen them live before! Barney! Play me some old live standbys, stat!
(actually I hope to god they don't do Blue Monday, unless they play some wild mutant version, but other than that I'd be psyched to hear Substance Live)
― Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
http://www.neworderonline.com/MessageList.aspx?ThreadID=17776
However apparently there will be a rebroadcast at 9pm thursday [UK time].
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)
i'm off to watch fahrenheit 9/11.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)
But in retrospect, I actually don't feel so bad. Because very very strangely, there was a post just up above earlier by someone I can't now recall the name of that said he only had a 56K and had real problems with the connection, like 30 seconds of sound and 30 seconds of silence. And we all know how bad the BBC Player is, so we can only guess at what this might have been like. But I can't figure out why his post is deleted. I've never encountered a deleted post on ILM. What does it mean?? Is there a ghost in the machine?
I mean I have had a few drinks but I have NOT had enough to start imagining posts that spontaneously disappear.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)
Pale as a sheet.
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 28 January 2005 05:45 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
Seconded.
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)
i guess it leaked
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 29 January 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)
― Mr. Snrub, Sunday, 30 January 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:08 (twenty years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)
― adam (adam), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Sunday, 30 January 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 30 January 2005 04:58 (twenty years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Monday, 31 January 2005 05:35 (twenty years ago)
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 31 January 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 02:30 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 02:42 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)
But it's actually this.
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:03 (twenty years ago)
― Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/tracks/05-02-01.shtml
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 3 February 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 3 February 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)
http://www.neworderonline.com/Gallery/NewOrder_KraftyFront4News.jpg
I kinda like it.
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
hate hate HATE WITH AN UNHOLY HATRED the typography. vile seventies horror, and what's with the mixed-case stuff between band name and title?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:45 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)
― coco, Friday, 4 February 2005 09:54 (twenty years ago)
'Republic' cover love seconded. One of my favorites, actually
― Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Friday, 4 February 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)
New Orderkrafty
and thus the lower-case k doesn't rankle as much.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)
― alext (alext), Friday, 4 February 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
― Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 February 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)
http://www.gigwise.com/contents.asp?ContentID=4195New Order @ Glastonbury
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 4 February 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)
Ummm... Goddamn it's catchy. I've listened to it three times in a row.
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
the O looks remarkably similar to low life's. That e looks really awkward. i do like the w, though, even though it is my least favorite letter of the alphabet these days.
― john'n'chicago, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)
― newOrderfanboy!, Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)
― meagain, Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)
check for user Davidii, he has it all
― biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)
check there
if you're in seattle, i could arrange a cdr
― biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)
Some thoughts on first listen.
Comparisons to Technique don't hold except for overall quality of the tracks. Not a duff track until the last, Working Overtime. Lyrics are as good as Bernard Sumner can do with the exception of Krafty. Chiming guitar, Peter Hook up in your face, not enough programmed beats for my taste but overall, the rock moments on WFTSC are not as "rocky" as on Get Ready. Not sure i like the collaboration with Ana on Jetstream. Sounds as week as the Gwen Stephani track w/ Hooky and Bernard. Not a great track, but not bad either. WFTSC, the song, is perhaps the best on the album. Turn, track 10, should have been the closer, great lyrics, good vibe...would have been the new Dream Attack if it had finished the LP. Unfortunately, they finish with Working Overtime, a cross between Rock The Shack + Slow Jam with a touch of Lust For Life thrown in...not as barfable as either Rock the Shack or Slow Jam but it's a vibe killer. Should have been left off the LP and saved for a B-side. Other than that, it's fucking ace. I'm on my 2nd complete listen, in order and it sounds better already! Life just got a lot easier to deal with.
― bg, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
― Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 5 February 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)
I'm halfway through listening to it now ... will comment when it's done.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:37 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)
― it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)
Seek and ye shall find. barflyjello
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)
Journey?
(I'm KIDDING.)
biznotic, if you could e-mail it to nedr@sbcglobal.net I admit I wouldn't mind.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
xpost
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:53 (twenty years ago)
-- it's a more upbeat version of "Republic". The sound and swagger of "Regret" is all over most of the WFTSC tracks-- everyone who loved "Get Ready" will love WFTSC-- everyone who hated "Get Ready" will probably like WFTSC very much. After a quiet period of about a year, in June 2006 somebody will start a thread entitled "Defend the Indefensible -- New Order's 'Get Ready'" and everyone will defend it with comments like "on second thought, a few of the WFTSC tracks aren't that different from the 'Get Ready' tracks. 'Get Ready' had some great moments'". A few people will hold out, however, by comparing "Working Overtime" to "Rock the Shack" (as per bg's very OTM comments), and claim that this one track sabotages everything and therefore they can't admit to liking "Get Ready", and maybe even WFTSC as well.-- "I Told You So" is reggae, New Order-style. It's good.-- "Jetstream" (with Ana from Scissor Sisters on vocals), is to "WFTSC"as "World" is to "Republic" -- it's more pop-dance than typical NO, and will probably be a single.-- "Krafty" is their best single since "Regret", and might be one of the best five or six singles of their career.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:41 (twenty years ago)
ok, this is battling Low Life already as my 2nd fav. New Order album. Technique being my fav. It's definitely the best thing they've done since 1989. Sounds like a collection of the best "album tracks" with Krafty and Jetstream being the only 2 that sound catchy and radio-friendly. album could use a pinch more on the keyboard front but the return of the acoustic guitar and the quality of bernard's lyrics catapult this to the top of my list. i assume many other people will rate this quite high in the newOrder catalogue. can't wait for the Jaques lu Cont remixes of Fast Synth/Guilt Is A Useless Emotion. can't help but wonder what it would have sounded like as a duet with Gillian. oh well.
― biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 08:09 (twenty years ago)
I realize that out of sheer politeness it might be prudent for me to hold my tongue about the album. But some of Barry & bg's comments get me a little riled, and last I knew it was a free country (though probably not for much longer). So I'm gonna weigh in, damnit.
it's a more upbeat version of "Republic"
Barry, I think you should be careful. This might not seem like a good thing to everyone here involved, and I don't happen to agree with it. I refuse to compare this album to anything New Order have done previously EXCEPT Get Ready, and even then, only in a general sense. That said, I think it's joyous thing indeed when people feel inspired enough to try to predict the future as you did about the 2006 Get Ready thread! Well done, and hey...perhaps it will even come to pass.
The first thing that sticks in my craw here is the people who can't stand "Rock The Shack", and by extension, will no doubt diss "Working Overtime". For god's sake, people. What is wrong with ONE only ONE track on a New Order album where they just ROCK OUT in the most regular, normal sense of the words? I mean, I actually think "Working Overtime" might be better than Rock The Shack, if only because the lyrics have improved, there's more influences at work, and there's no Bobbie Gillespie involved. First time I heard it I thought "ha! they're trying to do a velvet underground - no, hell...the strokes! no...The fucking FALL! That's it! They're doing a little bit of FALL here! New Order doing the Fall! Did you ever think you'd live to see the day?" NO for god's sake it isn't ground breaking, but then neither is that new squeaky clean band of 18 year olds on the corner over there making music in the same style. It's a bit of FUN, NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
My next point is to say that "Jet" or "Jetstream" (however they choose to name it, in the end) with Ana from Scissor Sisters, is absolute CRAP. I mean CRAP. Unbearably embarassing. Worse than anything on Get Ready. But yet it serves one very important purpose: making the track after it, "Fast Synth"/"Guilt Is A Useless Emotion" far more palatable. For that is the track where Bernard finally makes his worst lyrical bungle of the album: "Real love can't be bought/it is wild and can't be caught/real love can't be sold/it's another colour than gold" But really, if you can get past the lyric, it's not so bad, even if it does sound an awful lot like just another contemporary dance track for the chorus. It also makes the next track "Turn" sound EVEN BETTER BY COMPARISON! FINALLY BACK TO THE INARGUABLE UNBELIEVABLE BRILLIANCE, ETC.!
So without rhapsodizing too much about the rest of the album for now, I'll just wrap up with this:
Tracks that bothered me on Get Ready = 2Tracks that bother me on WFTSC = 2
But if I compare the REST of both albums side by side, ignoring the tracks that bother me, I think this one is better, stronger, and more cohesive than Get Ready. And I believe there aren't as many lyrical pitfalls as there were on Get Ready, as well.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 09:55 (twenty years ago)
I do quite like "Jet" actually, on first listen.
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)
I wasn't trying to get people involved, that was my honest description of the album. It's not nearly as guitar oriented as "Get Ready", and I disagree with the pre-release hype comparing it to "Technique". There's nothing remotely like "Fine Time", "Vanishing Point", or "Mr. Disco" on here. I don't hear pounding club tracks like those ones, I hear more pop-dance-y tracks like "World" and "Chemical".
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 12:06 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 6 February 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― william, it was really nothing, Sunday, 6 February 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)
The first thing that sticks in my craw here is the people who can't stand "Rock The Shack", and by extension, will no doubt diss "Working Overtime". For god's sake, people. What is wrong with ONE only ONE track on a New Order album where they just ROCK OUT in the most regular, normal sense of the words?
---the problem is, i don't listen to New Order for rock songs. I didnt' collect every 12", CD single, LP etc to listen to rock music. rock sucks the cock of the devil and i didn't obsess over newOrder to hear their One Rock Song. I hated RTS and Slow Jam on Get Ready but Working Overtime doesn't make me ashamed to be a newOrder fan like those 2 did. I'd rather have them put Working Overtime on a single or as a hidden track because it completely destroys the mood that they perfectly built up over the first 10 tracks. It's a throwaway song that the Order think is "fun" and a nod to their influences but it should be left off the album proper.
as posted by Bimble:My next point is to say that "Jet" or "Jetstream" (however they choose to name it, in the end) with Ana from Scissor Sisters, is absolute CRAP. I mean CRAP. Unbearably embarassing. Worse than anything on Get Ready.
---I would have strongly agreed with this yesterday morning when i had only heard that song 1 or 2 times but the more i listen to it in the context of the LP, i find it quite pleasant. It's not the best on the LP and i'm a bit disappointed at Stuart Price/jacques lu cont's contributions, but i think you need to give it a few more listens. I am opposed, in general, to collaborations on New Order records and have only recently begun to accept Turn My Way as a good song. I hate Billy Corgan with a passion and thought Bobby Gillespie's contribution was worthless. Ana Scissors should have never been invited to perform in the first place. Thank god Dawn Zee got left at home because she nearly ruined Republic and Get Ready for me.
One thing i can say is, please listen to the album in order a few times to appreciate the whole thing. Hearing the songs one by one, out of order, fails to produce the same kind of awe that listening to the LP as it was arranged by the band. It makes a difference.
― biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
i like how this album is sequenced.
― it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)
― it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)
TS. People who love New Order regardless vs. People who base their opinion of the band on a handfull of tracks over a 20year career.
― biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
still, from what people are saying here, it'll be one to savour. yum.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)
Classic Barney: the vocal melody with "...and I don't know where to turn when you're gone..." = shivers and tears.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)
actually beloved out-takes from 1986 would be preferable
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:29 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)
Yes, yes I am. ;-) But please, keep the followups on private mail!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)
― AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
I was mainly responding to what bg had said, but you are right I probably got a little too worked up and excited.
rock sucks the cock of the devil
Actually I don't think anyone would really argue with that! The devil, rock and cock seem to go together quite well!
they aren't a rock band and they fail miserably when the try to be one.
I take it you were never a Joy Division fan, then? Just curious. Mmm..."Interzone" seems to be playing in my head at the moment. Wait...now I hear "Novelty"...I might just have to pull these out.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)
TS: people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on NO taking a bit of the piss on "Rock the Shack" VS people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on their Billy Corgan hatred even though he only sings two lines on the record??
hahahahahaha! OMG Billy Corgan BREATHED on it! The VILE UNCLEAN THING!
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 7 February 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)
-- Bimble... (bimble87...), February 6th, 2005.
are you saying Joy Division are ROCK? if so, you and i have totally different opinions of what rock music is. I am in fact a big JD fan but don't consider them to be RnR in the slightest. How can you compare Rock The Shack and Working Overtime to the Joy Division sound? I think you need to pull out the Heart And Soul box set and rethink your position.
― biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)
Well, I didn't. Although I do think the guitar sound on Rock The Shack reminds me of some of the earliest JD (i.e. Warsaw). But I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree because I simply can't see how anyone can say Joy Division weren't a rock band, or at least that they had the capability to be. What kind of music does "Interzone" sound like to you? I'm not trying to be belligerent here, I'm just baffled that somehow you can place "RTS" & "Working Overtime" in the "rock" category, and yet not a single piece of music Joy Division ever did.
And sure I can understand if someone feels that "Working Overtime" spoils a certain continuity of the album. But then I feel that way about Jetstream - it just doesn't belong on there.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 7 February 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)
I do not like the Warsaw stuff and prefer Closer to Unknown Pleasures, although i really like Unknown Pleasures too. You have my number, call sometime if you want to chat about MCR's finest export.
― biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)
Well, I'm glad you feel that way. I really wasn't interested in this getting ugly, particularly as we just met!
I do have your number and would like to get together sometime, sounds good.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 7 February 2005 02:11 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Monday, 7 February 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 06:01 (twenty years ago)
― coco, Monday, 7 February 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 10:24 (twenty years ago)
― La Camilla Henemark, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)
Totally agree, these two track are the proper guts of the album I think. It's weird that the best bit seems to come three quarters of the way through though.
I'm "Jimdoo" on slsk, if anyone wants to grab from me.
― JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)
A thread to talk about Marion, the band (c or d?)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
Any file format is fine.
― Edward Bax (EdBax), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)
― John Hunter, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
Which tracks by New Order does it remind you of out of curiosity?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)
The Rub also noticed this.
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)
as people keep implying that the new stuff is good I am looking fwd to hearing this new stuff. good.
― gspm (gspm), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)
nothingelseon@gmail.com
― Bill E (bill_e), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)
I'm a musician and I write about music I love. I don't get paid to write for Scenestars. I do it when I hear something I want everyone to hear. When you start paying me to do it, then you get to call me bloated and self-important. We're not Pitchfork, we don't just do everything the way we're told to do it. Until then I'm just a music geek. Try to remember we're all on the same side, and if we're not then what the hell is all this for?
I really like the new record, and the positive response has far outweighed the negative. I look forward to seeing a huge resurgent interest in New Order as a result of this CD.
― EJ Friedman, Thursday, 10 February 2005 00:20 (twenty years ago)
Fine Time + Round and Round + Mr Disco + Vanishing Point = 4
All the Way + Love Less + Guilty Partner + Run + Dream Attack = 5
so to say the new album isn't like Technique coz its not synthy is a spurious point, no?
I think Technique was regarded as The New Order Ibiza Album coz the 2 singles were influenced by the scene, part of the album (a very small part) was recorded there and coz that was the dominating dance music craze at that time. It certainly doesn't come across that way if you listen to it in its entirety.
Waiting for the Sirens Call is actually I think a better song than most of thw songs on Technique. It's that good. It is far better than Krafty, which should NEVER have been the first single. And you know what? I think one of the things that made WFRSC the song good is that New Order produced it thmeselves. They shouldn't have got the producers in coz they produce better music when they produce themselves, every album twixt Power Corruption and Lies and Technique inclusive being proof. The only producers that have done the band justice are Arthur Baker (definitely, and probably coz he's so good he can't mess anyone's music up) and POSSIBLY Stephen Hague. I say possibly, coz he appeared to do a good job on Regret. I have often wondered whether True Faith might have actually sounded better without his influence - it's a great song, but it may have been even better without him! I wish for what will never happen (that's almost a Barney lyric!) ie, that the band would rerecord Republic, produce it all themselves and see if songs like Special and Spooky sound classic as a result, with Hooky's bass occupying the prominent place it so deserves.
(I have a funny feeling that dan will disagree with everything I just said)
― MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 10 February 2005 00:38 (twenty years ago)
Wow, I would have to strongly disagree -- there are many excellent songs on the album, but "Krafty" finds that space which other lead singles like "Fine Time," "Regret" and "Crystal" have, just working as a standalone pop song that recharges you and makes you think, "All right, bring on the album!" Now Republic lets down the side a bit there, I agree. ;-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:33 (twenty years ago)
Only really at the beginning though, the rest is like a full on happy "Love Vigilantes" crossed with "Regret".
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)
http://www.neworderonline.com/Gallery/WaitingForTheSirensCallFront4News.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
I think Technique has the best cover of the albums (LowLife transparency version a runner up).
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
Because everyone knows he hates minimal design. Oh wait.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)
― Neil FC (Neil FC), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)
― Neil FC (Neil FC), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
i like the cover.
― Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)
because it is fucking brilliant.
it works on about ten different levels, that.
mind you, i'm quite drunk.
still. wonderful. and the mixed-case thing works this time. so there.
god. i love that. i sincerely hope it isn't a piss-take.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)
― Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)
http://images.warner.de/images-artists/WEA/New_Order/573964/1027670.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)
― Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)
god, i'm drunker than i thought to come up with that ;)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)
― coco, Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:30 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, looks even better in the larger version. Great stuff. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:34 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)
― coco, Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)
I don't know what's happening to me. I've entered a twighlight zone. I just wrote this essay about this album. And...is that the cover? Be Jesus. I mean, bejesus. You know I just don't understand why the whole world doesn't come to a standstill about this album. Who are these people who don't care about it? My interest in people who don't care about this album is moving away from me at an exponentially decreasing rate, I fear.
All I want to understand is, having heard this album, WHY WHY would anyone listen to anything else at all? For what possible reason?
IT isU N R E A L
UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREALUNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREALUNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREALUNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)
― La Camilla Henemark, Friday, 11 February 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)
People can continue to compare it to what came before if they like,I’ll continue to see it as a singular statement wholly unconnectedto anything before in their career. They haven’t done reggae beforehave they? Only the cover of Keith Hudson’s “Turn The Heater On” that appeared on the Peel Sessions. When else have they done reggae?Am I just not remembering? Clue me in here. When onRepublic exactly did they tackle a reggae beat? When on GetReady for that matter?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 07:19 (twenty years ago)
er, just for the sake of historical accuracy: they did that cover of "vietnam", bimble, a couple of years ago. it was for charidee. i quite liked it, but i think that put me in a minority of one.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:40 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)
hahaha. You're funny, grimly. Yes, I know. But it was all central to my point. Sometimes I just get a little excited about this stuff. I want the whole world to hear it and be as happy about it as I am.
The title track has me on the verge of tears every time
Ha! Only the the title track? On the verge? I can sit and have tears streaming down my face most of the whole damn album.
I've been upset to find that neworderonline has been down for at least the last 24 hours or so. Anyone know what's up with that?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:13 (twenty years ago)
the "reggae" influence circa Republic must be the dreadful Sly and Robbie mixes of Ruined In A Day.
Turn the Heater On is one of newOrder's best songs and although i hated Vietnam when i first heard it, repeated listens rewarded me with one of my favorite windows-down-summerlovin tunes.
How f__king good is WFTSC? It's almost a perfect album. Better than we could have ever hoped for and they've got 7 more ready for the next LP. Bring on the Riton mixes of Krafty!
― biznotic, Saturday, 12 February 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Saturday, 12 February 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:03 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)
out-emo each other on this
Excuse me? I DO hope you aren't referring to me, as I abhor the word "emo" to begin with and therefore, never ever waste my time trying to "out-emo" anyone for any reason whatsoever.
And I am so so so so so tired of people pining away for another Technique. I do not understand. Movement is probably my favourite album of all time but I'm not sat here thinking they're gonna do another one of those or another Power Corruption & Lies or another Lowlife for that matter. Technique was released over a decade ago. This is 2005, get OVER it already.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)
get OVER it already.
GET over it al READY.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)
"The title track has me on the verge of tears every time
Ha! Only the the title track? On the verge? I can sit and have tears streaming down my face most of the whole damn album."
"I abhor the word "emo" to begin with and therefore, never ever waste my time trying to "out-emo" anyone for any reason whatsoever."
i mean c'mon! tears?!
it's not that i can't imagine anyone liking this album, i just can't imagine anyone being moved to tears over it.
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 08:39 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 13 February 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)
― stevo (stevo), Sunday, 13 February 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Monday, 14 February 2005 03:35 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)
― Patrick South (Patrick South), Monday, 14 February 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)
-- stevo (stefanroo...), February 13th, 2005.
you want 50 yr old men to still be experimental? that's the problem with those who don't like WFTSC; they expect newOrder to still be a "groudbreaking" or "experimental" band but they're just 50 yr old dudes who've already made their mark. now all that's left is having fun and writing music. nothing more, nothing less. enjoy it for what it is but don't expect for them to ever be creative they way they were from 82-85, it just ain't gonna happen.
― biznotic, Monday, 14 February 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)
― heywood jablomi (heywood), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
I think people can be experimental at any age. Would I have liked it more had they gone all crazy and weird on us? Maybe, maybe not. I still think what they have delivered here is more than enough, and I do think they have broken some new ground as far as their own career goes, even if they haven't re-written the entire rulebook of making music in the 21st century. It is a shame if people don't like it, but then I couldn't fathom the hate for Get Ready either.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)
(BERNARD has written some lyrics...)
HOOKY: What's the song? 'Regret'? We wrote the music for that two chuffin' years ago! 'Ere. (snatches the piece of paper)
A single grain of sand in the desertA single leaf in the jungleA single tear upon your cheekLove's right daft, I reckon
What the f*** does that mean?
BERNARD: It's just...words.
HOOKY: Oh well, that's all right then! (screws up bit of paper and tosses it over his shoulder) Bollocks!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)
― jetstream lover, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 06:34 (twenty years ago)
three albums in a row now they've stuck the most terrific song at the very beginning of the record. regret, crystal and now who's joe? with the chiming guitars so effortless and uplifting, like the end of a really good movie. it should have been the single, not krafty. although i've warmed to krafty as well. and "i told you so" is groovy and has the kind of lyric that tickles me.
i lose interest about halfway through, but i've never liked an entire new order album so that's not a problem. so, good stuff overall. four great tracks, which puts it by my reckoning on par with low-life and well above get ready!
oh, and "working overtime" is just dumb.
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)
But it's moot now, we have what we have and I will almost certainly enjoy it. I have not heard it yet - I am waiting for release date.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
i hate leaked albums, though. they're all encoded at 0.1kbps and have the wrong songs on them.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
-- Dr. C (petethane...), February 15th, 2005.
Classic! Complaining before you've even heard it!
― leftfield@comeback2005.com, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)
Well I had an unmastered CD of the album a month ago, but left it at a friend's house. He's lost it!
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 10:07 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 10:46 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)
the whole thing is less melancholic than usual. screamadelish in places (eg morning, night and day, esp barney's voice in the beginning sounds a little like gillespie's). and very varied. great stuff. it runs a little out of steam in the second half but the first three songs are quite possibly the strongest beginning of any no album ever.
krafty is the dullest song after the totally forgettable jetstream. really crappy electronic effects. quite classy to release it as the first single.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 18 February 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)
― jonviachicago, Saturday, 19 February 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)
it's better than "get ready". but, er ... well, so far "krafty" is the best thing on it by a country mile.
that said, i have been known to change my mind about new order albums. i'll need to give it a few more goes before i make my mind up. but so far i hear an awful lot of sub-david-potts guitar licks, some very bland synthesisers, and little in the way of hewn-from-stone hairs-on-the-back-of-the-neck new order melodic and harmonic genius.
hmph.
o: i also really like "working overtime". new order do the fall, yo.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)
jury is still out for me on this album, truthfully. there are some bright spots, but i'm not feeling its overall strength.
― janni (janni), Thursday, 24 February 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 24 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
TSK.
"Turn"? Great song! I'll let Spencer say more.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 February 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)
"Turn" is okay. not brilliant. nothing else on the album bothers me more than the way the first two songs play together. come to think of it, i'd say even the first three songs are the weakest of them, for me.
― janni (janni), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)
i thought alext and i were the only people who ever said "cockfarmer"! mind you, i now have this vague memory of alex wandering off at all tomorrow's parties in 2001 to meet "the bloke who invented the word 'cockfarmer'" ... ah, the wonders of etymology and linguistic spread.
anyway, "turn". just listening to it now. it's ok, isn't it? i'm not a huge fan of that strummety-strum twangety-twang stuff at the beginning: it's just not very new order, izzit? and the chorus is sub-britpop yawnsomeness, really.
but it gets going after the two-minute mark (after the ridiculous nineties organ bits). that's some nice scratchy guitar, and the treble melody that comes in about 2'45" is just sweeeeeet.
i'm not a fan of the synthy middle eight bit. it's just dull.
i dunno. it's a very, very average new order song. this whole album seems to be full of very, very average new order songs ... there are some exceptions to that, i think, but on the whole it ain't setting the heather on fire.
still, it's kicking "get ready's" ass repeatedly.
and "working overtime" is fucking brilliant. it doesn't belong on the album, but it has a place in my heart. -uh!
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)
(repeat until fade)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:20 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)
― jae (jazzler), Friday, 25 February 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)
Did anyone read the article where Steve Morris had to stop everyone in the studio to say "We've already done that song...it's on Low-Life!". They've moved on, they're happy writing songs together and that energy shines through in their music. Now listen again and again until your opinion matches mine exactly. Thank you.
― biznotic, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:32 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)
I've long wanted to say "Turn" is the best track on the album, but upon repeated plays, I've really been surprised how much that reggae-ish track "I Told You So" has jumped out at me. I'm not sure it's the best track on the album, either, but it's probably the most interesting, and certainly a landmark in their career. They tried something a little different there and though it starts out one way, it ends in another (does anyone remember how Bernard commented that somehow it ended up Velvet Underground after awhile?). Just something wonderfully creatively wild going on there. I hear more things in it each time I play it. For those of you who didn't catch the BBC thing, Morris was real proud of it cause he said it was based around his drum beat. I thought it was funny when Bernard wanted to call it "jazz fusion" and Morris said "eh...not jazz...more like reggae-rock fusion".
Republic is WEAK. Regret is the only track I can ever even remember off that album. Definitely the weakest New Order album. I bought it twice and sold it twice! Just nothing there.
new order do the fall, yo.
Now, didn't I say exactly that way upthread? (except I didn't say 'yo' ha ha) ;)
i'm not a huge fan of that strummety-strum twangety-twang stuff at the beginning: it's just not very new order, izzit?
Neither is Working Overtime "very new order". You're not getting anywhere with me using that argument! And if you work as hard as I do as often as I do, you can bet it's good to finally come home and hear New Order do a ballsy Fallish Strokesian thing about working overtime like that!
New Order have change, it's time you changed your perception of the band and either accept the NEW order or move on and forget about them.
This really is the very crux of the matter. But it's a realization I've only come to recently. I've decided it shouldn't surprise me that I'm not on the same page with people who were nuts about Technique, Republic & Brotherhood. Get Ready was the first time I'd been seriously interested in their output in years and years. This is a whole new ballgame, folks. Like it or don't, but don't waste your time hoping for another Technique or whatever. They are just not the same band. In fact, I was playing the album tonight and got to the end of the title track (#3) to that point where he starts singing "How many times must I lose my way..." and it occured to me very starkly that they had changed as a band. Because the amazing thing about that line is that the melody changes once again in this song where it's perfectly structured, and yet they switch gears and do it to you AGAIN, just that one more time even though you weren't expecting it. And the old New Order never would have done that. And that's why this album just pisses all over Get Ready.
And I'm not going to say it's a perfect album either. Upon repeated plays I will allow "Dracula's Castle" has begun to seem a bit boring. I've actually come to appreciate the dreaded "Jetstream" a bit more than that one, now, even if I do hope they don't do another song like "Jetstream" again.
So you know, in the end, maybe it ISN'T the bestalbum ever made in humankind, food of the gods, etc. But I still think it's just an all around enjoyable, fabulous thing and I'm sorry that people can't see that on the same kind of immediate level that it sounds to me. There are moments of sheer brilliance here. Open your ears to them.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:46 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 25 February 2005 06:11 (twenty years ago)
"where did it all go wrong/house music all night long"
This CD is teaching me what it means to use the repeat button on my CD player. I plan to be here for at least the next 6 hours with this album on repeat. This is probably my 5th play in. Let's see how many I can rack up. Should I start counting?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 25 February 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 25 February 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)
Two-thirds of "Republic" was great. The first two-thirds, more or less. It was nice of them to sequence the album so conveniently with all the best stuff at the start.
If you held me at gunpoint and forced me to choose, I would have to rank "Get Ready" above "WFTSC". It's close, though.
This may be the moment when the "Get Ready" posse abandons me for good.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 25 February 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)
― djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 25 February 2005 11:24 (twenty years ago)
Eh? I think the intro to Turn is the only thing that explains so many of the WFTSC/Technique comparisons. It's sounds very much like the intro to Dream Attack.
It's my favourite on the album too. And the fact it's near the end means I keep failing to give the middle of the record a fair chance - once I'm past Krafty, I usually can't resist skipping forward to Guilt... and Turn. In this sense (as well as in a few others, actually), this album is reminding me more and more of Electronic's Twisted Tenderness. That's a good thing in my book, by the way.
― JimD (JimD), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
'Waiting For The Sirens Call' is a pretty strong collection of songs and bare in mind that Lowlife and Brotherhood were around 20 years ago; guess we're surrounded by too much fashionista nonsense sometimes.
― nick towers, Saturday, 26 February 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 February 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)
I honestly appreciate this sentiment, and I've given it some careful thought, but the problem is, it's kindof like saying "stop masterbating because you'll go blind".
I went out to a pub tonight to meet up with a good friend who is moving to Sweden soon with his Swedish wife. They had already played 2 New Order songs in that pub prior to his showing up there with a few other friends of mine. And then soon after he showed up, and they were getting beers, I said "Did you know New Order are DJing in Sweden on March 1st?" And then right as soon as I said that, even though New Order weren't playing at the time, ANOTHER NEW ORDER SONG came on. I knew then it was going to be a great night. Well this was an "Seattle's only English pub" so I guess that helps. But Christ. They must have played about 8 New Order songs over the course of the evening. Clouds enveloped me, I was in some kind of heaven, etc.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 27 February 2005 07:41 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)
Bimble...What pub were you at? Not Fado, surely. Was it the George and something in Fremont?
― biznotic, Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)
Favourite moment is Barney's voice on "road is long". Yep.
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)
I'm undecided about 'Guilt Is A Useless Emotion'. The vocal line/lyrics really spoil its potential, I think. Actually yeah, it's not the lyrics themselves. I can love a line like "But out there the worldis a beautiful place / with mountains, lakes and the human race" when it's delivered the way it is on 'Krafty'. But all those flabby words on GIAUE just grate. I think I'd prefer a remix with just the "I want your love / I need your love" bits.
'I Told You So' is fucking brilliant though. Beats-wise it just puts everything else on the album, 'Krafty' aside, to shame.
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)
George & Dragon, yes. Fado is an Irish pub, but I'm thinking you knew that. It is pretty interesting how many more Irish pubs we have than English ones, isn't it? Although my roomate who is British said there is another English one out on one of the islands...can't remember which.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)
more later. i think part of my brain is still in a chalet at camber sands.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
I bet they rule the UNIVERSE at Coachella. I'm actually a little pissed that they're playing there instead of putting an LA date on their stadium tour.
― James.Cobo (jamescobo), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)
― biz, Wednesday, 2 March 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)
The US edition of Waiting The Sirens' Call will have one exclusive extra track.
Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Mac Quayle Vocal Mix)
This is also what I received tonight, some release dates:
3/8/05 Digital Release
Krafty (Radio Edit)
Krafty (Album version)
3/22/05 Digital Exclusives
Itunes
Krafty (The Glimmers 12" Extended)
Krafty (The Glimmers Dub Version)
Yahoo Music
Krafty (Phones Reality Remix)
Napster
Krafty (Bernard's Re-edit)
Real/Rhapsody
Krafty (Riton Re-Dub Remix)
3/29/05 Digital Release
Waiting For The Sirens' Call UK version
4/26/05 CD Release
Waiting For The Sirens' Call US version*Includes bonus track Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Mac Quayle Vocal Mix)
― biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:26 (twenty years ago)
-- James.Cobo (trdn8...), March 1st, 2005.
I'd like to have this quote engraved in a plaque sometime, I think.______________________________jetstream has been stripped of ana matronic completely. overall sound quality is greatly improved. vocals sound like they were rerecorded on sevaral tracks.
Oh god you tantalizing liar! Look, look I really need to know the answer to this question: I have thought for quite some time in my gut that they are going to get rid of the piano ending to Dracula's Castle on the album. Honestly I would rather they didn't, but if they do, I can deal. I just need to know: is it gone? I have to know that now, and the rest of the surprises can wait until later.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:11 (twenty years ago)
WTF, this will ruin it. Along with "Someone Like You" and "World" (I believe I made this comparison upthread), "Jetstream" is this album's slightly more dancepop-y than usual "destined to be a single" track. Would you want to hear "World" with just Barney singing on it?
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:31 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:33 (twenty years ago)
Hey, don't go down the road to ruin...
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)
MR. POTATO HEAD?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:37 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
Wait, hold on, no love for the last line?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
station bar tonight, 6pm? (i should really do this over e-mail but i can't be arsed.)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)
What is it again? (checks)
Oh yeah. No. That's not so good.
The "I was upset you see almost all the time" / "I was a short fuse burning all the time" bit is quite nice too.
Other than that, what have you got? A big "Do we have to?" N.O. Hook hook and a crappy chorus. Pass.
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 4 March 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― jae (jazzler), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)
― Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)
― jae (jazzler), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)
would they really go to all that bother?
unless they want to confuse the issue: ie ensure we all buy a copy because only then will we really know what it's meant to sound like.
soddit, i'll be buying the vinyl - there will be vinyl? - just for the cover art. but given how heavily i'm starting to fall for this album, i'd want to buy it anyway.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 5 March 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)
― jae (jazzler), Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 March 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 6 March 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 March 2005 05:54 (twenty years ago)
That is from the amazon.com product page for Waiting..., and here is the back:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0007TF0T0.01.BACK._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
I am even having these lovely visions that they will be selling T-shirts at the gig of it...don't take these beautiful dreams away from me!
Also I did think the version of Jetstream sans Ana was very much improved. Wonderful to hear Barney sing the backing bits. It's more rudimentary instrumentally, too. You can hear the dynamics of the band better. I dig.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
― biznotic, Friday, 18 March 2005 03:49 (twenty years ago)
I mean is that all we're going to get for the front sleeve of a new New Order album is a stupid silly picture of nothing but a few stationary boats? For CRYING OUT LOUD TELL ME IT'S NOT SO!
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:47 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 18 March 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)
(and I love the boat cover, Ned OTM! I didn't even think about that).
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)
A few good points, and a few points that make you go WTF??????#*&$@?@?@? Par for the course for Petridis, I suppose.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 18 March 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)
but ... but ... that would be brilliant!
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)
[hears marcello's angry footsteps; ducks]
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)
"But nor have they released a consistently great album since 1989's Technique."
But nor did they release a consistently great album prior to 1989's Technique, duh.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Monday, 28 March 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)
― Richard K (Richard K), Monday, 28 March 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 28 March 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)
No offense, but the US getting release dates way way after the UK date is like ancient history, man. Been going on for 20 years at least. It's a law of physics at this point. It's something you can pretty well count on, except in rare cases: for example I think Radiohead managed a dual release date once. It's something that has irritated me greatly over the years, this delayed release date thing, but I don't expect it to change.
barney's going to sail the first batch over in his boat.
No. Hear me? I SAID
No.No.
There will be No boats, harbours or any such thing on the sleeve or heads are going to roll. And I don't trust Barney out in that boat, either. Row him to shore where he's safer. I don't expect him to get the album to me by risking his life on the open seas.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 28 March 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)
Not for the MIA album! I think we may have got the Daft Punk a day early too.
Also, my UK copy has the No cover. The boats are inside.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
Also, I liked XTRMNTR much more than Get Ready which is described well.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
Spencer: y'know, one reason I'm not as "WOOOOOOOOOOO!" as you about Sirens' Call is probably because, um, I'm not you. ;) And I'm assuming the "well-written" complement - thanks! - is aimed @ my NO write-up, not my sub-pithy one-liner.
BTW, Spencer, if you & Barry could tell me what new album you're going to geek out about next, I'd appreciate it, as that'll let me know what I'll be writing about next on the 'Fork (to your mild-to-severe chagrin, no doubt).
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
TS: "shoot speed kill light" vs "rock the shack" ...
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)
if something so simple is incorrect, i'm afraid you lose me straight away. i deal with this kind of thing every day, it saps my soul, and my response is always the same: if a publication can't even get the name of a song right, why should we trust its writers on anything else?
this is not personal! it's just a big, big beef about standards. especially on the web (cf my comments on the pitchfork thread).
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)
As for what's next, I can't see myself getting this excited unless The Avalanches release something later this year. I'll look forward to your rated meh+ review!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
by the way i like your review quite a bit. especially the way it gets more and more enthusiastic from beginning to end. not enthusiastic enough though...
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
Haha, I really want to take you up on this (first the Low album, and now New Order).
Had I written the review, I would have given it about the same mark (~ 8/10) and been equally critical (but more toward the tracks in the middle, rather than the ones at the beginning). So, I think the review is a fair assessment of the album, but nonetheless, I still have no idea how "Crystal" and "Working Overtime" have the same sense of purpose.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)
― Yngwie AlmsteenMay (sgertz), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)
it's an undeniable classic. so is "krafty". and i love and adore "working overtime". but after 20 listens or so, my flirtation with the rest is pretty much over. it's a good album, and i will listen to it occasionally, but it's not what i hoped it'd be; or, indeed, what i thought for a glorious couple of days that it was. ach well. at least it's a good metaphor for life.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)
I won't desert youI don't know what to sayI really hurt youI nearly gave it all awayI got it ('on' or possibly 'all')'cause you ('were not the one'?)and I don't know where to turnwhen you're gonewhen you're gone
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)
Who's Joe - what an opener! skyscraping, anthemic, moving.... the guitars and bass sound so good locked together. Sounds a million times more powerful than the empty bluster of Rock The Shack
Hey Now What You Doing - OMG! brilliant stuff. I love the way that Phil's guitar on the first instrumental break is all Johnny Marr-ish and controlled, but him and Barney just totally let rip on the next two breaks.
Title track - beautiful. I didn't think they could do something so elegant yet driving and uplifting any more. The second 'when you're gone' that Barney sings at the end of the chorus is wonderful in itself - a small, significant pop moment - and wonderful in the way that it slides headlong into Hooky's lovely bassline as it picks up the pulse again. The guitars on the verse do *that thing they used to do* back in the days of Lonesome Tonight, Sunrise et al, and the keyboards on the chorus are monumental. The keybd break from around 3.00 to 3.30 reminds me of side 2 of Brotherhood for some reason - maybe it's the timbre and orchestral feel.
Morning Night And Day - I love the intro - the first part, just before the sequencer comes in, seems to be about to launch Neil Tennant upon us. The four little filtered chords just before the vocals are really neat - I love the way that they're not overdone, but just keep popping up throughout. Another great chorus, nice bubbling sequencers etc.
Dracula's Castle - I have to spend more time with this one, but I definitely approve of the piano intro/outro.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 March 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)
Dracula's Castle reminds me of Duckula's Castle for some reason.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:04 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)
but only just.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)
PS: Your name is Grimly Fiendish.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 31 March 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)
(i didn't read the rest of this thread yet...just incase everybody hates it and then i get put off posting my like)
― Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)
― Edward Bax (EdBax), Friday, 1 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 April 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
archive is available now!
― biznotic, Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)
I like "Krafty", "Morning Day and Night", and "Turn".. kinda.
This pales compared to Get Ready though.
It sounds like a throwaway Electronic album, but with some more layers of guitar in the background.
I think I'll go listen to Revenge now.
― donut debonair (donut), Monday, 4 April 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
Actually, I just can't get "Hey Now What You Doing" to stop playing on repeat in my brain. Which is a shame, because it probably means I'll hate the song very soon.
― Lukas (lukas), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)
on the bright side, Hooky mentioned they were rehearsing WFTSC for the live sets. the remixes of Jetstream will be on promo next week and i found the album and 2 krafty singles this week at Tower Records! bring on the US 2x12"!
ps. Dracula's Castle is ace despite it's terrible name. if you were crying for Technique2, DC is your song.
― biznotic, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)
Someone else with a Mojo handy might like to expand on this half-remembered anecdote.
PS: Don't worry, I taped it before I took it back, and I still have the single with the mixes and video on it.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:41 (twenty years ago)
― Jack Ass (Jack Ass), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)
That was a good idea.
Saville didn't do the last one, did he?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)
I've always assumed that this is because he wears a coat that's black and long and doesn’t know that it's all wrong - although of course it's perfectly possible that I may be mistaken in this respect.
The album? Well it's really a bit New-Order-by-numbers isn't it? Currently listening to iot for the second time and I'm afraid nothing about it's managed to grab any part of me at all so far.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)
My! :-) Strong praise but I think well-deserved. Technique rather than Movement remains my 80s NO touchstone in terms of a full album but I definitely think it's the best since that one.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)
...this is so unexpectedly great that I can hardly believe what I hear.
The Uk reviews that I have seen have all been poor : Mojo 2 stars, The Times 3-stars (cockfarmer Paul Connolly), The Gruniad (Petridis).Is Uc-nt out yet?
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)
What a tosser that reviewer is.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)
I thought the reviewer, although he has obviously swallowed a dictionary and then regurgitated it and then shoved the remnants up his arse using his mum's old plunger, was pretty much spot on, only a bit guarded. Can't for the life of me think why.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)
Exactly! You've made my day, Stevie!
Dan - I think you'll really love it.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)
Rereading that review, it is more positive than I remembered it, and the words are bigger.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:34 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)
**which among other things features an ode to a woman who looks like Collina. ;-))**
Who's that by then? ;)
It's an album of sublime moments (WFTSC, that is, I haven't heard the ILX Comp yet!). The bass on the chorus of Who's Joe? moves me to tears. The way that Barney sings 'I've got to find you, I've got to find you' on the same song. The transition at the end of the second chorus on the title track when the keyboards come in over Hooky's bass riff. Just beautiful. I realise that this band has a lot of very personal memories for me and that others are (rightly) evaluating it in a squarely 2005 context. See, I can't do that - the best moments of this album do *exactly the same thing* to the 43 yr-old me that Closer and EGG did when I was 18/19. The same feeling as the first time I heard JD do Dead Souls onstage a lifetime ago. If I'm honest the intervening albums since Movement haven't *quite* done it, not even Technique, so I wasn't prepared for this.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)
Thus far I'm afraid the album's done exactly the same as EGG did for me when I was 18 too - it's left me feeling sad and disappointed but not particularly surprised to be feeling that way.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)
Actually I got in the car to drive home last night last night, turned the CD player on, and rapidly found myself thinking: hey, actually this isn't too bad after all.... that doesn't sound much like Barney 'though.... in fact it sounds more like Richard Butler...?" before I realised I'd already finished the New Order CD and had put the new British Sea Powere one on instead.
Sorry Doc, I do think New Order have done some great stuff over the years, but I'd happily swap their entire recorded output for half an hour of long-lost, newly-discovered, previously-forgotten demos of otherwise unrecorded Joy Division material.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 7 April 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 7 April 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)
I've just bought it! Mine has got Robert Plant on the cover! I had to choose between two equally bad CDs! I chose Robert Plant's compilation! Him mighty hairy! The man in the shop referred to it as "a quality magazine"! I says to him, I says it's all down to Jerry the Nipper, it is!
(I was going to retrieve the New Order album from the bowels of my hard drive last night, but I was too knackered.)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 7 April 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 7 April 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)
I would have sent you mine if I hadn't taken it back to the shop.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 7 April 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 7 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 7 April 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
But as far as I'm concerned, recreating the Power Corruption & Lies cover with real flowers was about as daft an idea as it gets and the band were well within their rights to reject it.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 8 April 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Friday, 8 April 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)
I think what would be side one is good, but side two is pretty unappealing, especially Jetstream (which appears to be an homage to air hostesses, and I used to live next door to some and they were no fun) and Working Overtime, which is a dreadful letdown at the end of the album, worse than Primal Scream. What a waste of a bass player.
I haven't heard Brotherhood for a very long time, but I think it's a lot better than this.
You were right about that guitar solo, Dr C, the one at the end of some song or other.
I like the title track best.
To their credit, this album is unusual in that you don't spend all your time wondering exactly what it sounds like. It doesn't really sound like anything else.
Naysayers mourning the lack of Joy Division demos may like to investigate the Revenge live album, as reviewed by our old friend JtN. Apparently Hooky cackles piratically.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 8 April 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)
Maybe I need to lower the dosage on these prescription meds...
― Lukas (lukas), Friday, 8 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:45 (twenty years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)
i am surprised how much you like the album, dr.c. it probably is their most pop release up to now. it reminds me a little of the great first electronic album. the great difference though is how varied the songs are. i still think that the most generic new order song "krafty" is the most soulless track. somehow i have the suspicion that i like the album more for nostalgic reasons than because of its quality.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)
I hear some parallels with the first Electronic album, but not many. For me Hooky is key on WFTSC, and even though he's not so prominent, Steve Morris too. Even though it's obviously sync'd and sequenced to hell, and probably not even played on an acoustic kit, no-one else could have played the drums on Who's Joe or the ttle track exactly like *that*.
Like you, I had some reservations about Krafty for a while, but I love it now. The final half of the song is just classic New Order.
Kyle - I saw them in 2002. Six JD songs (Atmosphere, Transmission, She's Lost Control, Digital, LWTUA and... oh I can't remember!), but honestly it wasn't great. Too much autocue from Barney, plus you know pretty much what they're going to play these days, as they have everything pre-programmed. That's not to say that 2005 won't be better with the new material. I hope it is.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
but people have been saying that since before they toured for Technique. I know I'm not going to get Taras Shevchenko (unfortunately). I'm afraid I'll feel like I lost my chance if I don't catch them this time though.
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
i saw them live once on the loreley festival 1992. they played after sonic youth and god were they shite after that phantastic guitar thunderstorm.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)
Why not? Do you mean "get" or "get"? (It is in print on DVD here in the US)
― Spencer Chow in Rio, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)
I'll be seeing them in Oakland on the 29th of this month. Will report back, obv. Not expecting miracles, I suppose but also feel like this might be my only chance etc.
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow in Rio, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)
Well yes, my favourite New Order stuff is Movement, Ceremony, EGG, Temptation etc etc, but this new album is NEARLY AS GOOD!! Musically v.different, but a v. similar emotional effect.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)
I actually find those kinds of things really hilarious! He's said that those old JD songs are "quite heavy to listen to these days."
― Spencer Chow in Rio, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)
Er. Do you really mean to use the word "strain" there? Because if he took voice lessons, you shouldn't be able to hear any strain at all.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 14 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
I do hope you realize now what faint praise this is, Dr. C.
I enjoyed this particular quote of yours quite a bit -
I Told You So sounds like a more polished version of something they would have thrown together for a Peel session in 1982. The same spirit that's behind Turn The Heater On, TooLate, 5-8-6 etc. Magnificent!
I just wish they would do a good old fashioned vinyl 12" of "I Told You So" - you know, this 10 minute long version or something where they lose all control...bongo players come in, horns, sheer insanity...but I'm probably just dreaming. Isn't Jetstream the next single?
No, the first post of this thread says it will be "Hey Now What You Doin'" (AKA Road To Ruin). Damn!
**thinks for a moment**
DARE WE HOPE FOR B-SIDES????????
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:17 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)
well, i've got a promo of it sitting on my desk. the cover is pish.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)
If you took voice lessons to help mediocre pipes, the strain will show. Anyway, it's just speculation. Besides, if Barney sang any better, I'd like him less.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 17 April 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
"On their past few albums, especially 2001's rock-infused Get Ready, New Order showed us that they were a band eager to evolve. Now they're ready to undo all that evolution, making a satisfying return to the Blue Monday sound of their heyday. As Waiting for the Sirens' Call proves, the pioneering newwavers' intricate mix of driving keyboards, I'm-going-to-slit-my-wrists-now! lyrics (their eighth studio album boasts such future Xanax-withdrawal mottoes as ''I took my heart to Dracula's castle in the dark''), and airy vocals (Scissor Sisters' Ana Matronica lends an assist on ''Jetstream'') still feels novel — even downright fresh — 25 years later. The perfect soundtrack to a nihilistic day. Grade: B+"
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)
This sounds like a Coumbia House write-up...
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)
― laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 13:26 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)
JtN's review was possibly a better review than the LP is an LP.
Like JtN I like the title track. Apart from that it is not so great.
It is odd to see the Doc praising it - I could swear he was dismissing it last time I saw him.
― the bluefox, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 06:51 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)
Uh? Did we talk about this? I remember talking about the Psychedelic Furs. I dismissed them I'm sure.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:21 (twenty years ago)
So - you DO like the New Order LP, simple as that?
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)
Yes I love the New Order LP. I said so upthread.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:42 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 10:02 (twenty years ago)
― the dreamfox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 11:13 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)
It gets better. "Krafty," "Turn," and the title track ahve already gotten much love, so I'll skip'em. Instead, concentrate on "Guilt Is A Useless Emotion," which is the dance hit we've wanted from them for years. Give this one a proper remix and it'll storm the dance charts.
I'll post back when I've absorbed the rest.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:07 (twenty years ago)
I thought you were going to tell us you were the lassie referred to above.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)
― piscesboy, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:19 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)
Yes, you *can* love the Psychedelic Furs and New Order. It's just that I don't.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:35 (twenty years ago)
if you don't appreciate the barney-esque genius of that couplet, you are beyond hope. it's absolutely perfect.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)
I don't criticise lyrics based on how they read. I cringe when Barney sings them as well.
― Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)
This seems to imply that prose should not be read aloud - that reading-aloud is an unnatural habitat for prose. Yet that view seems to me false.
We have all been speaking prose all our lives (except, of course, Elton Welsby, who speaks poetry).
It is true that pop lyrics are not just words on a page - that they have other effects. We have all been over this before, many a time I dare say. But it is also true that if we want to work out, or argue, that, or why, a pop lyric is good or bad, we can make a fair start by writing it down, and seeing how it plays. In any case, on ilx writing is the only option: we cannot sing to each other in our posts.
I think that Z. is correct: Sumner's lyrics often, though not always, sound bad when he sings them, let alone when anyone writes them down.
― the bluefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:29 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
Going to see them play live at the Jimmy Kimmel taping tonight - I know a writer on the show so cross your fingers for my green room access hopes!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)
Perhaps it is even as good as 'Turn' by Travis?
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)
xpost - prepare to be surprised.
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
So you can see that for me to compare New Order's 'Turn' to Travis's is a compliment.
I also like a 45 that I have never owned, but has a really nice 12-string intro, I think: 'Coming Around'.
Maybe I need Travis: the Singles.
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)
Actually, I'm only disappointed because of the detail that's been missing since their baroque extended dance-pop workouts from the mid-80s (like "Perfect Kiss" etc).
Also, the Travis I've heard has been very boring and not melancholically wistful at all like New Order's "Turn".
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)
You are mistaken, I think, to accuse Travis of a lack of wistful melancholy. Try 'More Than Us', or even in its way 'Why Does It Always Rain On Me?' - another very good little 45.
― the rainfox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)
Actually, "melancholically wistful" is a pretty good description of Travis.
xpost, pinefox agrees!
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
I don't think artists of such standing are generally lazy "will this do" merchants. I'm sure they are trying their best. So why does it so often sound different to us?
Part of my suspicion about the whole thing is rooted in the lack of consensus from fans about which tracks exhibit this autopilot/song generator thing. As I have said many times, the moment I first heard 'Regret', that was the way I felt about it. Few seem to share this view, but it's all over that song for me ("Oh here we go, here's the big hook, oh and here's the big Hook").
Yet 'Krafty' and 'Turn', which some accuse of being warmed-up mediocrity above, sound (respectively) wonderfully invigorated and touchingly stoic to me, in a way that the feted 'Regret' and WFTSC title track do not?
I think I have may have reached the end of the road for articulable appreciation and criticism in this area. Actually, perhaps I have more to say about 'Krafty'. Why did no one ever mention that it is all about the kick of the drums bringing things full circle to 'She's Lost Control'? Then moving on, and up.
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
The moment I head Krafty, it seemed obvious to me, but no one else seems to think so. If it isn't obvious to all, I suspect it's me at fault. But I can pretend.
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
The two Stuart Price tracks are the best, I think.
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)
― titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 28 April 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
it's by far their best song. and it was apparently concieved as a b-side.
― shine headlights on me (electricsound), Thursday, 28 April 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
(actually that a bit dramatic. But it *was* just the right amount of messy)
and now they're doing LOVE WILL TEAR US APART
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 28 April 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)
This is the key similarity to Technique for me.
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 28 April 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 07:20 (twenty years ago)
I like the lyrics to Thieves Like Us, but I suppose you could make a case for them being stupid. They are, however, a bit more on the edge, a bit more desperate. This applies to most "early" New Order, I think, with one or two exceptions. By "early", I think I mean "real", as in prior to any splits and reunions and whatnot.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 28 April 2005 08:35 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)
Also, the first half of this album is basically "Barney sings the 'Gun Porn EP'" which makes it even more awesome.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)
They like it that way. Trust me.
― Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)
They were great! 2 tracks on the show and then 6 more because they said they hadn't had enough rehearsal time for Coachella. Very tight and Bernard's voice sounded great. Stephen hasn't changed a bit. The new guy is not annoying. Hooky is very cool. "TRANSMISSION"!!!
No I'm not jealous. I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU. No, not jealous at all.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)
The "Let's Go" comparison completely falls down once you hit "Dracula's Castle" but comes back full-force with "Turn". So right now I think this album is a gigantic slice of wonderfulWTF between to giant hunks of "Let's Go".
New Order is so awesome.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)
on air:KraftyLove Will Tear Us Apart
after the show:Waiting for the Sirens' CallCrystalTemptationWaiting for the Sirens' Call (again! - was unsure why)Transmission
I feel like I'm forgetting something...
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, me being summoned by teleporter.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
vid's up
― kingfish maximum overdrunk (Kingfish), Thursday, 28 April 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)
― Steve Gertz (sgertz), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)
However, I think I will be coming up to SF sometime in the next few weeks. I really want to hang with SFxors!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:40 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 29 April 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)
i've seen them at festivals over the past few years, and they've always played 'ceremony.'
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 29 April 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 29 April 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)
― Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)
Hooky is the man of the hour, really, he makes this band. New guy is excellent.
Biggest drawback: no Ceremony and no Isolation. Otherwise, this vastly exceeded my expectations.
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)
― philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Saturday, 30 April 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)
so does that mean he thinks there's a substantial amount of substandard material on WFTSC too? in that case: why fucking release it? grr.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)
so does that mean he thinks there's a substantial amount of substandard material on WFTSC too?
Nah - it's just a cute joke about how fans always want the old favourites, surely?
― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
and yes, i know NO have a long tradition of self-deprecating stage banter etc. it's just ... well, many a true word spoken in jest. if i was barney and i was standing there battering out temptation and LWTUA and the rest, and then i had to play bloody "who's joe", i might just begin to realise that something, somewhere had gone ever so slightly wrong.
but i'm very aware that my impressions of WFTSC are out of sync with most people's on this thread. i mean, it's not a bad album. but, you know, this is new order. they used to be gods, remember?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
i really don't get the "turn" love at all!
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)
That's not a fair comparison though. You can't expect any band's greatest hits to stand up to any old album track, no matter how good the album is. Particularly a band that's been around for 20 years and has released as many singles as NO have.
I agree that "Krafty" and "WFTSC" are up there with their best tracks, definitely amongst their strongest 15-20 songs ever. Right now, at least for me, nothing else on the new album approaches those sorts of heights, though.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 00:59 (twenty years ago)
Kyle, please don't take this personally, but go eat lizard brains. The hell it didn't! Can you at least cut them some slack because as Barney said afterwards it was the first time they played it live? (indeed, aside from the Kimmel show, this is the first time they've performed live in 3 years!) Personally I thought Run Wild and Crystal (though normally I don't even like Crystal) were the two most transcendent performances of the whole show. Barney had said it was the first time they'd done Run Wild live "so feel free to go get your money back now". To immediately dispel any illusion of inadequacy I yelled out "PERFECT!...PERFECT!" I was fairly close to the stage and it seemed quiet enough that he might have heard me but I can't be sure cause I wear earplugs at gigs. Anyway he then mentioned that it (Run Wild) was "one of his favourite songs...well...as if that means anything, one of my favourite songs..."
I don't recall him saying the bit about "bore you to death" but then it does take a few seconds for my brain to translate Manchester accents so I can't say I'll always catch everything. I do recall him saying something like WFTSC was "actually pretty good, I mean, you know, it's alright..." And with the tone of voice he used, I just took it to mean that he was simply proud of that particular track without being too certain and boastful about it - more pleading like "come on, you have to at least admit this one is pretty good". The accounts of the Kimmel show I've read bear that out, that he's proud of that one. I don't think he was trying to say anything about the rest of the album necessarily other than just being characteristically self-effacing.
I've got pages of notes I've written about the gig. And I've got overall general themes. I thought I would have something nice and complete and concise ready to post here about it for anyone who might be interested. But I'm a bit conflicted now, and still extremely tired and sleepless from the trip. In the end, this was a far more highly personal experience than I might have imagined. The way I EXPECTED it to go wasn't the way it went. Have you ever gone into something thinking you would get one thing, and finding at the end that you got something entirely different but equally if not more valuable than what you expected? That's where I am with it.
I can recount several instances of Barney's entertaining stage banter if anyone here cares.
But I guess for now and in the interest of being as brief as possible, I will stick to general themes. It seems to me that what is going on here is a bit of a courtship ritual, a romance between them and their fans. I've never known anything quite like it. They have ceased to be icons for me now, gods, musicians, performers. More than anything else, I came away with a sense of their humanity. Of flesh and blood and bone. Not so much because I could SEE them, but because of Barney's special way of presenting them, verbally and physically, and Hooky's attempts to reach out - unexpectedly moving to the far opposite edge of the stage from where he had been standing for much of the gig just to make sure that the fans on the other end of the stage could be with him for awhile, too.
And I am not bothered by people who are disappointed because they feel the band are (musically) capable of more. Truth be told, I feel they are capable of more, too. But the fact is they are in a mode right now where they are self-conscious and thinking of the fans. Wanting to please the fans. That's why their set lists are as they are. That's why they steered themselves towards dance music on this album whereas I really get the feeling they'd rather go rock or pop or experiment like on "I Told You So". That's why it's so ironic when they ended with Blue Monday and I found myself bored to death and watching Barney sing it with NO EMOTION WHATSOEVER - completely lifeless compared to all other songs he sang that night - KNOWING full well they are as bored (and probably more so!) with it as I am.
And yet I find myself so intertwined with them at this point, so smitten in this love affair, that I am touched by these gifts of sacrifice and generosity on their part - that they even played the gig at all - that Barney used his aging energy to dance or just freak out like a rock star for a bit (the quote, btw Kyle - was "I'm not as young as I used to be" - he never said "old"). I forgive them even their faults, as I might a loved one. Even if I can agree they are probably capable of more.
At the end Barney said "Well, we tried our best, we hope it's good enough." I am not one to complain at this point. And I thought it especially interesting when he said the bit about "well we either jump around or play the music right - what do you want?" because I was thinking just prior to him saying that that this was exactly the tension being created here - for the first few songs he was amazing at just restraining his enthusiasm enough to work on the vocals, I was so proud. But in the end I wanted him to freak out too - I wanted him to dance and rock out and lose himself in it because in doing so he was reacting to it as *I* would - again, his humanity was what showed through.
I found it a source of amazing inspiration that these people - suddenly now so clearly human as you or I - as human as the lines on Barney's face - could create something so beautiful and god-like.
And I remembered something Alfred Soto had said on the Movement thread which I had meant to comment on and never did. About how Barney still goes about his work as though he was never meant to be the proper singer. That he has no ego. Well, I don't think that's true that he has no ego - I do think he and the band are proud of certain things they've acheived. But yet Alfred Soto's statement encapsulated what has always been so special about New Order. They represent some strange accident of human and god-like. These kids who knew nothing about playing music, heard the Sex Pistols and decided to try hooking up their guitars to Bernard's grandmother's stereo and somehow became famous rock stars.
When they played Transmission I wanted to yell out PUNK ROCK! And "She's Lost Control" sounded so much like the original - Stephen and his weird looking electronic cymbals - that you could literally HEAR Ian's vocals even as Barney sang. It was weird.
Also if anyone wants a description of the T-shirts they were selling, let me know. I got two.
And I must say Phil is a far more attractive bloke than pictures have led me to believe. (even if I didn't spend much time looking at him!) He has a sortof unique shoulder length hairstyle now that suits him well.
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:43 (twenty years ago)
that's the point of the song . I've never heard a performance of theirs where they sounded like they sang it with any emotion. it's an emotion-free song.
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
... which leads me to grimly NO peeve #26: since when did they become the kind of band that gave two fucks what the fans think? pah.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 1 May 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)
thanks for the rundown of barney's banter. i was side stage and really couldn't make out too much of it. i did however understand the 'we're gonna bore you now' part.. haha. was a great show throughout, i agree, but the JD covers didn't work too well for me with barney's voice. the instrumentation was spot-fucking-on, but the second his vocals kicked in, it seemed kinda weak. that said, everything else was pretty brill.
― ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
Frankly, I don't give a toss for grumbles that NO are going out of their way for fans. Any band with their discography circa '82-'89 can do what it wants.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)
That's true, but I meant on a more physical, visual level than that. Considering every other song they had done had seen him showing some level of enthusiasm, it was clear that here he was bored to death. In the old days, Taras Shevchenko days, he pretty much sang everything with that frozen look on his face, barely moving at all. But now it's different, and that's another thing I find interesting, that the lack of energy shown on Taras by him and Hooky has long since worn away.
Last night I watched the version of Everything's Gone Green on the new Umbrellas In the Sun LTM DVD, and as rough as it is as far as both sound quality and the "unfinished" nature of the song, I think it might just be conclusive proof of the existence of God. Not even 1982 yet and they were doing this. Jaw dropping awe, etc. Yes, I cried. They do that to me sometimes. I cry. This happens. Not new information.
Here's some more Barney banter from the Oakland show:
"This is a song from our new album, which is apparently called 'No'"
"I hope it's not this hot at Coachella. I might have to storm off the stage...like Morrissey did"
"I'd like to let you all have a sip of my wine. [pause] I don't suppose it would last too long, though"
"Where did it all go wrong, house music all night long" (what song was it he said this just prior to? I can't remember - something in the second half, one of the well known oldies)
"This one is for your boys in Iraq" (before Love Vigilantes)
"It's been 25 years since our singer left us so we'd like to remember him with this song with his [Hooky obv.] very nice bass line..." (before She's Lost Control)
"We'd like to do a song for all you disco bunnies out there" (before True Faith)
Before Love Will Tear Us Apart there was an awkward pause and he said "Peter has to start this one" and Hooky said happily and confidently "That's riiiight. [deepened, omnious voice] And I like to take my time, in bed as well as on stage!" Ha ha ha. Hooky also egged the crowd on a lot to sing with LWTUA. Did Barney do this as well? I became confused for a bit cause I was looking down or trying to avoid the more aggressive antagonistic members of the packed-like-sardines crowd I was in, and I looked up thinking it was Barney egging us all to sing along but in fact Barney's lips weren't moving and it was Hooky. Tired of the admonishions, I gave up and sang along, and Hooky went over to Stephen for the only time in the gig and faced him as they finished the song.
As far as Blue Monday went, it was kindof Stephen's moment in the spotlight because the band started it well before Bernard came out on stage again and Stephen had stood up to begin playing a synth so you could see him a lot better than before. He was wearing what looked like a new black t-shirt with this light to medium blue design on it of an anchor and the letter "Y" on one side and "3" on the other. I saw him look at Peter (who was playing those electronic drum pads you see him play in the Perfect Kiss video) and Stephen mouthed with much emphasis "1...2...3..." and counting the numbers off on his fingers. I saw him turn to Phil and do the same thing. I'm not sure what exactly what this might have meant as they had already started the song and it didn't seem to be connected to what they were doing instrumentally. Also an interesting thing happened when Bernard quit singing his part for the song...he went to a keyboard next to Phil's and eventually you heard this (black?) female singer sample. I can't remember what the words were she was singing, it was just one line, but it went really nice with the music and I was rather delighted they'd done at least SOMETHING different to Blue Monday.
Also, at one point in the gig, Barney knocked his mic stand over on purpose. Can't remember what song that was. He also looked like he was pretty close to throwing his guitar at one point, but controlled himself and handed to a roadie. I also love the way he adds those unexpected high pitched whoops here and there. He did this more towards the beginning of the gig. Fabulous stuff.
Well I think I'm finally finished talking about all this for awhile, but I do want to admit that I'm beginning to give some serious thought to whether this new album really is better than Get Ready. I think it's easy to be confused because the highest highs of the new one eclipse anything on Get Ready. But I think Get Ready might be slightly more consistent, has more staying power, a better production sound, and more Gillian. Yes, I do believe I miss her. But one day the children will be grown and maybe she will come back to the fold.
BTW, as has been previously stated, they have nearly enough material already for a new album which they plan on releasing in a year's time? Not sure. One dreads another Radiohead Amnesiac-to-your-Kid-A situation, where a whole bunch of tracks are recorded at the same time and inevitably the second album of those tracks can't match up, but I am honestly so thankful for any tiny little movement of New Order's fingers and beats of their hearts these days. I feel blessed just that they are alive and still doing what they do.
Coachella stories please. I beg of anyone out there. I need Coachella stories.
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Monday, 2 May 2005 06:36 (twenty years ago)
something in the Mojo interview led me to believe that one of their children has a serious illness and it wasn't just a matter of them being young, is this correct?
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 2 May 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)
Frankly, I don't know how Barney maintains his boyish exuberance without sounding leaden; "Waiting for the Sirens' Call" and "Turn" are great pop songs, soft like wool but firm as steel thanks to Stephen and Hooky (who sounds marvelous throughout).
The standout track for me - only because no one's mentioned it much - is "Morning Night and Day," which is in the great tradition of "Soone rThan You Think" and "Subculture" - those effortless Bernard I-walk-the-streets-drunk-as-fuck-from-a-night-ofclubbing songs that define the post-Joy Division morning after better than a million "Closer" sequels.
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
I'm actually DJing between sets at that show. Very exciting, yeah, but also kinda scary for me since I've never done anything quite like that and in front of so many people. Thankfully most people don't pay a lot of attention to that stuff!
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)
― Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)
Yes you are right - I recall reading that too now, but I'd forgotten it because I'd read somewhere else more recently that it was just that she wanted to be around to take care of the kids, without any mention of illness. Who knows? I don't even know for sure if there is more than one of them. In any case, here's hoping the kid(s) grow up healthy and strong. :)
I think it's highly unlikely they'll do another LA show this time around. There was talk of adding a New York date in June, and I'm kinda praying for that, but not really having much hope about it either.
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 00:40 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)
Please do not mention this sad state of affairs again. I pretend that did not happen. (I do however regret [har har] not seeing NO with Billy Corgan as the fourth member, which frankly to my mind is a glory and a wonder. As it stands I was out of the country at the time anyway, which is also why I missed the Roxy Music show that summer at the Greek. That I not only regret, I metaphorically tear my hair out over.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)
hrm. i suppose tonight's chicago show will be opportunity for this again. c'mon out ned!
― john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)
Second, i've got the recording of the Oakland show but it's missing the first two (She's Lost Control + Love Vig) and Blue Monday. Not a great recording but listenable and a good memory.
Those overpriced shirts were 10bucks cheaper at Coachella.
New Order played a great set on Friday and a not so great set on Sunday. Actually, it was like the old days. Bernard didn't jump around and both him and Peter were in foul moods. The sequencers didn't work on a couple songs and Bernard missed his cue several times even with the aid of a telepropmter.
The mixes for Jetstream should be big club hits. Richard X's mix is hotter than hot and will hopefully find it's way into a wide variety of DJ's boxes. The Arthur Baker mix isn't bad either, in fact, it manages to recapture a touch of that late 80's sound that he helped shape.
I wonder what the Chicago and NY shows will be like since he's torn a ligament in his foot while dancing in Oakland. Pretty subdued, i'd guess.
As for Gillian, she is indeed out of the band to care for her child who has a serious illness. It was either her or Steve who had to quit and she stepped up and took the challenge. Run Wild was reportedly written about/for Steve and Gillians child, though the ending couplet is out of place in that context.
― biznotic, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)
Barney noticed it too and pointed it out: "hey look, a helicopter!" The massive videoscreen zoomed in on the copter, then zoomed out until it had the crowd and the stage in frame as well.
Then the band kicked off "Waiting For The Sirens' Call". Just about that time I realized it's the best song on the album. I'm sure that's a coincidence...
― Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― BlastsOfStatic (BlastsofStatic), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
She's Lost Control, Love Vigilantes, Regret, Hey Now What You Doing, Krafty, Transmission, True Faith, Run Wild, Jetstream, Waiting For The Sirens' Call, Bizarre Love Triangle, Love Will Tear Us Apart, Temptation, Crystal, Blue Monday
May 01, 2005 Empire Polo Field - Indio, California (US)
Atmosphere, Waiting For The Sirens' Call, Regret, Transmission, Hey Now What You Doing, Krafty, Jetstream, Bizarre Love Triangle, Love Will Tear Us Apart, Crystal, Blue Monday
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)
At Coachella, they really should have swapped out "Hey Now What You Doing" for "Tempatation".
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)
I have been reading a lot of neworderonline forum stuff and heard about the T-shirt prices changing. I suppose they were pricey but I normally expect concert t-shirts to be in the range of 30-35 dollars so it didn't seem at all overpriced at the time. Coachella people just got a lucky bargain. I think the dark green Ceremony one is gorgeous, most beautiful shirt I've ever had.
I've got the version of Run Wild from Oakland. Toying with the idea of whether I want the whole gig or not. Right now I'm collecting more early versions of Everything's Gone Green. Apparently the version on the Umbrellas DVD was the first time they ever performed it!
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)
Peter Hook rules. i can't remember which song it was, but at one point he stood spread legged with his fist raised as the lights were raising up behind him. all i saw was this hulking silhouette at the edge of the stage. my mouth dropped slack at how ridiculously cool it was. also, he took of his shirt not once (at the end of the first set), but twice (throwing a black tour shirt deep into the crowd after the encore)!
― john'n'chicago, Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)
when i got my first meagre pay packet, back in the summer of 1993, i blew the whole thing on a pair of fucking leather trousers. peter hook has a lot to answer for.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)
1. waiting for the sirens call (CLASSIC, best single since Regret)2. krafty 3. i told you so (I really love this)4. dracula's castle (this is debateable but I kind of like it)5. turn (this is a pop masterpiece. but it's almost too slickly produced)6. guilt is a useless emotion
the other songs I just can't deal with. this makes it the same ratio of good to bad as republic and get ready for me; edging get ready, a bit. the only problem is the songs I dislike on this one I REALLY HATE where as on the other records they're kind of forgettable.
Still, not a bad ratio, album better than people think.
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
"I Told You So" sounds very, very familiar to me. It's completely fucking awesome; maybe this is the most Electronic-ish song on the album?
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 5 May 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 5 May 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 5 May 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Thursday, 5 May 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)
Love VigilantesCrystalRegretHey Now What You Doing?KraftyTransmissionTrue FaithRun WildJetstream (with appearance by Ana Matronic)Waiting For The Siren's CallBizarre Love TriangleLove Will Tear Us ApartTemptation--------------------------------------------She's Lost ControlAtmosphereBlue Monday
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)
no real low points in the show to speak of, except that they didn't play "the perfect kiss." but i can deal.
― rajeev (rajeev), Friday, 6 May 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 6 May 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― rajeev (rajeev), Friday, 6 May 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 16 May 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:02 (twenty years ago)
I don't think I've ever disagreed with a positive review of an album I like more strenuously than I have with this one. Between the "let's completely get the album wrong and pick out the most easily-decipherable song as evidence of New Order's inscrutability" vibe here and the Bruce Springsteen review with a gigantic Trent Reznor coda tacked onto the end of it to make word count that, in its print version, couldn't get the name of the new album right (is it really called The Teeth, Mr Editor?), this was not a good week for the Boston Phoenix music section. (Perhaps if I was a Ben Folds fan I could find the egregious errors in that story, too.)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)
*should I comment? Nah, it's not worth it.*
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)
― Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 06:04 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:25 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 12:03 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)
― Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
Also, it's followed on the US album by "Working Overtime" so it's just not an album closer here.
(hahaha although the synth in the actual bridge-bridge is perilously close to the "All The Way" synth patch)
Another song on this album that's been sneaking up on me is "Morning Night And Day".
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
It souds like a sterile version of "All The Way" to me. turn sounds like all the way with a soul and heart and tune. i wonder what those words mean in your vocabulary, dan: faceless, generic, personality-free and sterile. they don't make the slightest sense whatever concerning turn. not in my world of music and language anyways.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)
That "new 'Dream Attack'" meme from upthread has stuck with me so much that I sometimes (often?) forget that "Turn" isn't the album closer!
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
http://www.popworld.com/repository/1960588.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)
Nice pics Spencer!!
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)
― siren, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)
WTF is with Peter's pose in the second picture, BTW?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)
― ja (_ja_), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
For me Turn is an interesting one - I like the way that the obviousness of the chord changes are coupled with a certain restraint on the chorus. There's a slightly reluctant feel to the guitar and it sort of drops out at the end of some lines (I'll have to re-listen to say exactly which ones) where you would expect it to continue. The vocal is quite un-Barney like too.
I still really, really love WFTSC and the chances are that this won't change now. AND....there's a follow-up in the can apparently!
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)
Also, Ana Matronic is quite the chameleon, she looks completely different in the "Jetstream" video. Her verse in that track is so great.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, I was going to say. It looks like he's aiming his bass at some target in the sky as though he's going to throw it like a paper airplane.
― The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Saturday, 21 May 2005 04:23 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 July 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
Between the soundcheck and the concert, I sat down with New Order management (Andrew Robinson and Rebecca Boulton) to talk about what will be happening in a close future for New Order.
* As expected "Waiting for the siren's call" is the next single, expect a release date early August 2005.* Rhino will be releasing a DVD compilation of all New Order videos, expect two new video from old songs (Ceremony and Temptation) directed by Michael Shamberg. Expect a release date mid September 2005. Sleeve will be done as always by Peter Saville.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!YAY
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
MIchael Shamberg ran Ikon, Factory's VHS arm, no? I'm rusty on my Factory trivia. I think he may be married to Miranda Stanton/Stanton Miranda of Thick Pigeon now, or they were at a show together or something like that. /useless trivia.
Dan Perry, you are on crack. The Perfect Kiss video is an absolute joy to behold, and I can watch it over and over again. I fetishize every moment, from Peter putting the pict in his mouth to play the synth-drums to the bandmembers all looking to each other as the song ends, every object, from the Joy Division poster on the wall to the gear, OH THE GEAR! Gillian starting things off with a Octave Plateu Voyetra 8, the Emulator Frog preset. One of the best videos ever.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
agree that Dan Perry is smoking crack. Perfect Kiss is probably the best New ORder video. If you don't like that one, this DVD set is of no value to you at all. Pick up the US double disc version of International for the 5 track DVD on disc 2.
― biz, Friday, 1 July 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
These statements suggest crack-smoking:the overwhelming majority of their vids suck. "The Perfect Kiss" video is mind-bogglingly boring and really badly sung.
Here's the tracklisting!
ConfusionThe Perfect KissShellshockState of the NationBizarre Love TriangleTrue FaithTouched By The Hand Of GodBlue Monday ‘88Fine TimeRound & RoundRunWorld In MotionRegretRuined In A DayWorldSpooky1963Crystal60 Miles An HourHere To StayKraftyJetstreamWaiting For The Sirens’ Call
Extras:Round & Round – USA/PattyRegret – BaywatchCrystal – Gina Birch version
Live:Temptation (from 3.16)
New:Ceremony (dir. by Yu Likwai)Temptation (dir. by Michael H. Shamberg)
YAY, I LOVE SO MANY OF THESE THEY ARE SO CLASSIC!
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
Bizarre Love TriangleConfusionThe Perfect KissTouched...Blue Monday ‘88Fine TimeRound & RoundRunRegretWorld
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
("Substance" was all about the videos from "Shellshock" onwards IMO.)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)
TS: the goofy pre Fine Young Cannibals video for True Faith with weirdos bouncing around in funny suits or Jonathan Demme's classic footage of a live performance of The Perfect Kiss performed in a studio, catching the very essence of New Order?
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:13 (twenty years ago)
No I'm not! Not intentionally, anyway. I was actually going to explicitly call out the video for "Confusion" as being fantastic but got lazy.
That "True Faith" video is one of my favorite videos of all time.
The "Perfect Kiss" video is mesmerizing and sounds perfectly "in tune" to me.
Oh man. Um. That's simultaneously fortunate and unfortunate (because that is seriously one of the worst vocals I've ever heard from Mr. Sumner and I would love to be able to ignore how teeth-grindingly awful it is).
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)
The extra cowbel is cool, I will grant you that.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)
― Lukas (lukas), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)
Anyway, echoing all the YAY news above, of course.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)
I think I said something along those lines upthread, Spencer.
Of course, the flipside is that if people knew more about music, they wouldn't let musicians get away with sucking.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 2 July 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
And...wait...there's a Ceremony video? **nervous that it might suck and ruin the song entirely don't want to see it ever incase it does**
Hey it doesn't have Touched By The Hand of God!!!!! CURSE THEM!!!OH wait...it does. Fabulous.
Confusion is so dated. You're better off with the original 12" than seeing that video.
The Perfect Kiss video is great, awkward but great. That's all I have to say but...
"Waiting For The Sirens Call" has a video?Oh yeah wait they said that was gonna be the next single in August. But you know they won't part with any juicy B-sides for another year. Even though they have them up their sleeves. Jesus Christ was born in a manger.
Anyway, it's a DVD, and that's just grand for now. I NEED TO HAVE THE WORLD IN MOTION VIDEO ON DVD. THIS IS THE MAIN POINT.
― Weasels & Chipmunks Ahoy! (Bimble...), Saturday, 2 July 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
If people knew more about music, perhaps instead of trusting their gut and visceral response and not questioning their enjoyment, or dislike, they'd sit around and talk it to death to the point of no longer paying attention to the music itself. Wait a minute...
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 2 July 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 08:34 (twenty years ago)
Seeing as most of the people here don't know anything about music and DO THAT ANYWAY, you don't seem to have a point here.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 2 July 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 2 July 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)
― the oracle has spoken (grimlord), Saturday, 2 July 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)
that's almost a caricature of every negative thing detractors say about his voice.
I do understand that there's an exaggerated quality to his voice in the video, but I'd say it spotlights what's really wonderful about Barney - the unstudied child-like earnestness.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
New Order has rounded up 22 music videos and a 1993 documentary for the upcoming DVD "Item," due Sept. 13 via Warner Music. According to a spokesperson, one disc of the package includes clips for such classic tracks as "Blue Monday," "True Faith," "Bizarre Love Triangle," "The Perfect Kiss" and "Regret," as well as two newly shot videos for "Ceremony" and "Temptation."
The other disc will house the documentary "New Order Story," which chronicles the group transformation from Joy Division into worldwide dance/rock superstars. The film was previously released on VHS but has been expanded here to twice its original 70-minute length.
*eyes roll into back of head*
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)
http://www.neworderonline.com/Photos/Cache/6886.14.large.jpg
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of What Were You Expecting When You Clicked On This Thread??? (Dan Per, Friday, 15 July 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
-- The Ghost of What Were You Expecting When You Clicked On This Thread???
New Order-related news that didn't necessarily have to do with this album, which is what I got, tough guy.
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)
I'm really starting to salivate at the thought of that DVD, though.
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Hello? (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)
According to Warner Music Germany, New Order is expected to release new 7" singles on September 26th.
The following tracklistings have been revealed:
A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Rich Costi Remix)A. Temptation (Secret Machines Remix)
A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Band Mix)B. Everything's Gone Green (Timo Maas Remix)
A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (JKL Remix)B. Bizarre Love Triangle (Richard X Remix)
And there is also a 12" (to be confirmed) featuring:
A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Planet Funk Remix)B. Blue Monday
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)
― Baaderonixx on a long black leash (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)
― The Spiderwebbed Wilderness (Bimble...), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:37 (twenty years ago)
― biz, Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
I want them to release a full CD5 here, in a regular jewel case. That way I can take the single cover and occasionally put it in my full album jewel case.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)
― 10ftwall, Saturday, 3 September 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 3 September 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)
― carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 24 September 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 24 September 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)
― someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)
― biz, Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)
If so, I am frightened.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 April 2006 06:42 (nineteen years ago)
― honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 April 2006 04:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Saturday, 22 April 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)
i should read back through this thread and find out.
i'll listen to it this week.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 April 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
wow. what a rollercoaster ride of emotions i was on. i'm looking forward to listening to it again now.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 April 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)
I will say this though...upon going on a walk in the sunshine today with Disc 1 of Substance...
In history they will write about the most timeless bands, Led Zeppelin, The Beatles...but when it comes to the dancefloors alone, New Order reign. Even if that means enduring Blue Monday for the 5 billionth time after I swore I couldn't stand to hear it again.
― honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
The album with Crystal on it is now £1.97 in Music Zone.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (J-E-T) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (*Sob*) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
drunkenly, i listened to "age of consent" walking down the street at midnight last night. they don't really NEED to do anything else. they wrote that. that's good enough for me.
there is a case, which i might one day make, that it is their finest song of all.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 29 April 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)
― honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 29 April 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)
― honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 29 April 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
The guitar tones on this album are magnificent. They make the album alone. So warm and yet nostalgic.
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6923972.stm
"You are no more New Order than I am!"
― Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:36 (eighteen years ago)
This album sounds even better now that when it came out. Maybe because it's such a summery album. I'm inclined to say it tops even 'Technique'.
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)
Hold on.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)
No, it's too late now, sorry Ned.
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)
this record totally fell under the radar for me. haven't heard it yet, and don't envisage hearing it anytime soon
― Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
Fopp had them for £3 back when they wus OPEN.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I bought it again!
Hook's myspace statement on shenanigans is crazy...
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=180575671&blogID=292670868
"dont assume you have the rights to do anything NEW ordery"
Hmmm...new ordery....
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
It's all about being sober he says, elsewhere.
Christ, that sub-literate Hooky myspace thing is proof positive that rock stars should never, ever blog. Talk about fatally diminishing your own legacy.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
Hahahahahaha this is hilarious! And sad.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
Does that mean we'll get a new Electronic album?
Eintrag von Garry von 27 Jul 2007, 14:44 PeterHook If your not bloody careful! although if you want a bargain i believe the BEST OF is goin for 2 quid in the shetland islands! glad i didnt do a revenge one!
Eintrag von PeterHook von 30 Jul 2007, 18:01
― Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)
But he DID rerelease the Revenge stuff on LTM...
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
He did a revenge *several* !
― Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
The "Gun World Porn" EP is good, though.
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
YES. I own that on cassette – the best thing they ever did.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
brrr. hooky's blog ain't working, for some kind of server-error-style reason. i think this is a good thing. i read something he'd written before, and it was pure arse.
it's a shame, all this, but hey. new order haven't been new order since gillian left -- i mean, that was the whole point of changing the name after joy division, etc ... that it was more than the sum of its parts, etc, and they wouldn't try to keep the band going in the same way without a core member.
way to defile a legacy, though. cocks.
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
They'll ask Andy Rourke to join, the bastards.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)
Bringing back Gillian and doing one of those "playing the whole album" tours would be a great career move at this point. The question is which album.
― everything, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)
They could have a crack at Tigermilk maybe?
― Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)
At this point I'd rather have a new Other Two album anyway.
― leavethecapital, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 06:16 (eighteen years ago)
The question is which album
the answer is "movement". that would fix 'em good.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 07:44 (eighteen years ago)
well, Electronic Renaissance is basically Procession....
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:01 (eighteen years ago)
The answer is 'Substance'
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
then they would have to do Confusion live....have they ever done that?
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)
er, yeh? i've got a video of it somewhere. at least one.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:30 (eighteen years ago)
looks a bit like this.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:31 (eighteen years ago)
Peter Hook was ugly anyway. Next.
(j/k pete, u know it's love)
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)
the cover version of 'turn' from the new order fan 'community2' cd is excellent, btw (by someone called glast nost? beats me).
http://www.myspace.com/neworderonline
― akm, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:33 (eighteen years ago)
It's nice but I can't help thinking it totally reveals the "Hallmark ad" core of taht song.
― baaderonixx, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:26 (eighteen years ago)
i'm reviving this one 'cos it seems to be the closest we've got to a contemporary rolling new order thread ... anyway, was in borders the other day picking up some new books and spotted the words "BERNARD SUMNER" looming down at me from a high shelf in the "independent publishers" section.
turns out it's a 216pp unauthorised biography by some dude called david nolan. cost me 13 quid ... just started reading it this morning and it's quite fascinating so far. the USP is that nolan gave barney the manuscript to read and has printed his notes verbatim -- so barney crops up every few pars with a "hmm" or "no, it was more like this ..." or some other such gnomic pearl. turns out it's also reviewed in the october "word" (yes, i know; i quite like it, and it's got collins and maconie in it, so fuck off) ... as the reviewer said, the barney comments are so good you do rather wish he'd written the whole thing. but, given that was never going to happen, this is a more-than-adequate substitute.
more once i've finished it. maybe.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
Interesting - strange fellow, Barney.
Anyway, they're getting back together again for an AHW memorial gig. There's a Manchester Evening News link somewhere if I can find it. I just hope it doesn't become a 'New Order final gig' thing.
― Dr.C, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
bound to, though, innit?
am about halfway through the barney book: it's astonishingly sloppy in places (pars where every other word is mis-spelt) but rattles along at a fair old place and spends enough time being absolutely fascinating to make it 13 quid well spent. much of the narrative is driven by (erstwhile NO road manager) terry mason -- and some of barney's comments about his reminiscences are priceless (eg "terry? a dreamer like ian curtis? that's so wrong ... leave it in").
nolan's writing's nowhere near as good as he thinks -- there are a few awkward attempts at imposing a "style" that fall flat and are promptly forgotten about -- but his research and thirst for detail are admirable. i've had a flick through to the end and it deals with the hooky/myspace fallout -- there even seem to be some barney comments about it. not gonna spoil it for myself just yet, though :)
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)
(and dr C: if you could post a link to the gig news, that'd be great. i'm stuck in an island farmhouse on dial-up and google is not my friend.)
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 11:42 (eighteen years ago)
Here's the article. BUT there's another flippin' Hooky announcement since then, which is below.
Manchester Evening News Article
Dianne Bourne 11/ 9/2007
NO sooner have the original band members of New Order gone their separate ways than rumours surface that the group may be reunited - for a one-off tribute to the late, great Factory Records boss Tony Wilson.
The legendary Manc band split earlier this year after bass player Peter Hook announced he was no longer working with singer Bernard Sumner and drummer Stephen Morris.
But Peter has now revealed that he has discussed the possibility of reforming the band for a one-off tribute to Tony - the man who first signed the band to his Factory label in their former incarnation, Joy Division.
Hooky told the M.E.N: "It's very typical New Order to split up and then get back together again just like that isn't it?
"The idea has been mooted by Oliver (Tony Wilson's son) - that was when it was talked about.
"And the thing is, for Tony, I'd do anything.
"So, I'm not ruling anything out - I never do really."
Since the death of `Mr Manchester' last month, there has been much talk about what will be the most fitting tribute to music mogul and broadcaster Tony, with suggestions including a huge memorial concert.
And Hooky says he doesn't think any tribute could be too big for a man so influential in his own, and Manchester's, life.
He tells me: "What I'd like is a huge statue of Tony, stood there, legs akimbo, on Princess Parkway, with `Welcome To My Manchester' on the top of his head - that's what I'd like.
"I don't personally think, for someone who was as important to me as Tony was, that any kind of tribute is too big - particularly when you think how much he gave to this city."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Hook's Blog Entry
Can I just clear up this Manchester Evening News Article. In a conversation with Oliver Wilson about a tribute gig for his father, he asked me what the chances were of getting New Order to perform. I said, "Seeing as we have just split up, pretty slim.", he then said to me "If I could get the others to agree, would you do it?", I said "In honour of your father, I'd do anything."
This means I would sell the popcorn, take the tickets, sweep up after, play bass in New Order/Joy Division/Crawling Chaos.
I do wish that people would read things properly before mouthing off. I am definately going to have to learn to keep my big fat mouth shut (but I blame the bloody press!). And as Tony would say "Fuck em!"
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)
i saw that and it's not clear to me that this is actually happening...I think he was just saying he would, not that they were.
― akm, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:11 (eighteen years ago)
that 'hey now, what u doin' song recently used on advert is teh suck
― blueski, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)
they should have used "everything's gone green"
― Mark G, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)
what's teh suck - the ad or the song?
The song is great btw.
What's the ad for? - I've seen it, but can't remember.
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
finished the barney book. hmm. it goes downhill quickly. basically, the dude found out a couple of interesting facts about his childhood (his mother was seriously physically disabled with MS and his birth name really is sumner) and got some amusing anecdotes from terry mason about the JD days. once mason disappears from the scene, it becomes yet another sketchy dash through the slow decline of new order, punctuated by occasional shafts of barney wit. worth reading -- especially the first half -- but i'm revising my opinion about it being worth 13 quid ;)
still: the author rates "republic" above "get ready" and "WFTSC", so he's obviously got some sense ;)
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
Who Doesn't?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
I sure don't.
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
But is that book worth £7?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
yes! absolutely. buy it.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
I think it's hilarious that Hooky said he'd play bass in Crawling Chaos for Tony.
I saw this Bernard book on Amazon before but something just didn't make me jump to get it for some reason. Maybe in time I will feel differently, but frankly all I've done for the last year and a half is read music books, many of them Manchester-related and after the Hannett one it was like "well...what the hell could go any further than that?" I couldn't imagine trying to follow that one with anything remotely related, at least for a good while. I'm through with music books for awhile. I'm just not sure I want to know every detail of Bernard's life, either, but I may well reconsider after a few years. I am glad you at least thought it was half good, grimly. That's at least better than I might have expected.
― Bimble, Friday, 21 September 2007 04:03 (eighteen years ago)
-- grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:28 (2 days ago) Link
SINGLES ONLY: Republic > Waiting for the Sirens' Call > Get Ready
ENTIRE ALBUMS: Waiting for the Sirens' Call > Get Ready > Republic
― stephen, Friday, 21 September 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)
Just read the Bernard Sumner book. Not a great work of art of anything but the kind of fanzine-y tone was very enjoyable. Had some stuff I didn't know (Barney is a yachtsman!) and interviews some people Who Were There which is always nice (except when he then relies on those same people for comment when They Weren't There i.e. the aforementioned Terry Mason). It'll have to do until the as yet unwritten Steven Morris autobiography comes out.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
Also hadn't known bout Barney's Angels until reading this book. http://www.barneysangels.com/ Ahhh...
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:02 (eighteen years ago)
And associated (and rather lovely) flickr group... http://www.flickr.com/photos/barneysangels/
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:03 (eighteen years ago)
I like that flickr stuff. I can't believe I actually remember that blue picture of him in Record Mirror. That Barney's Angels site is pretty cool, too.
It'll have to do until the as yet unwritten Steven Morris autobiography comes
Ha! If there was a Stephen Morris book out, I'd grab that right away. ;)
― Bimble, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)
Why the hell is there a Japanese version of "Krafty"?? http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/11/3/344326/NewOrder-Krafty%28Japanese%20Version%29.mp3
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)
Because it's great? I was slightly suspicious of the lyrics though because they sounded a bit like made up Japanese. Apparently they were done by Masafumi Goto of Asian Kung Fu Generation so presumably they're right.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:42 (eighteen years ago)
.. or they're really funny.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:45 (eighteen years ago)
this makes me cry. and not in a good way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PClE6Uhml4M
:-(
― stephen, Friday, 12 October 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)
because it's rubbish?
i blame even as we speak for giving them the idea, their version isn't much better
― electricsound, Friday, 12 October 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)
And Frente. What is it with Australian bands doing twee versions of that song?
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 12 October 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)
Who cares about crappy New Order cover versions??
Sunrise, Live at the Hacienda, 1985: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVP0qpJNH-0
― Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 06:57 (eighteen years ago)
Or better yet, This Time of Night, live 1985:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9OCB69KwpU
― Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 06:59 (eighteen years ago)
Hurt, live 1984, shirtless Barney: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRu5CThEmcE
― Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 07:04 (eighteen years ago)
"Morning Night and Day" is waiting for a remix that will take it heavenward.
I'm still waiting on this
― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 22 August 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)
what happened to all these other songs from that session (don't tell me they ended up on the Bad Lieutenant thingy)
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Monday, 23 August 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure anyone else but me cares at this point but...Peter Hook: New Order to release 7 songs from ‘Waiting for the Sirens’ Call’ sessions
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 14:36 (fourteen years ago)
Hope they include some of the Xenomania stuff.
― daavid, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ynkz5EfIirs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5LX16zia2k
note the similarity in the intros
― an independent online phenomenon (DJP), Wednesday, 18 April 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)
Time for a mashup
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 April 2012 15:31 (thirteen years ago)
seems like not many people wanna talk about Lost Sirens - I know most of it is pretty average but I realize that MOR New Order has become my classic rock - could listen on repeat to middle-aged balearic stuff like "Recoil"
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 22 January 2013 14:40 (thirteen years ago)
In at number 23.
Not bad for being hard-to-find in shops (whatever shops are left, etc)
― Mark G, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 15:40 (thirteen years ago)
New Order 80 min CDr 'Best Of'
Seeing New Order in Austin TX tonight (first date on a short tour) and made this 'best of' to coincide with the show. Took their most recent setlist (last month), took out some of the old Joy Division-esque stuff (and JD "covers") and replaced it with stuff I prefer-- a couple tunes from Technique, "Touched by the Hand of God," and "Love Vigilantes."
Total running time: 1:19:39
01 Elegia02 Crystal03 Regret04 I'll Stay with You (lead track on Lost Sirens)05 Fine Time06 Age of Consent07 Love Vigilantes08 Here to Stay (non-album track from International)09 Your Silent Face10 World11 Bizarre Love Triangle12 True Faith13 Touched by the Hand of God14 The Perfect Kiss15 Blue Monday16 Dream Attack
― ilxor, Friday, 19 July 2013 16:24 (twelve years ago)
I was going to put on "Low-Life," but for some reason put this one on for the first time in eons. Still sounds great!
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 December 2021 00:54 (four years ago)
I saw them in Denver, Colorado back in 1985. One of the best shows I have ever seen, they were at their peak. I have searched and searched for photos from that gig, I don't think anyone has ever put them up.
Setlist:
SunriseThis Time of NightHurtThieves Like Us5 8 6Everything's Gone GreenThe VillageSubcultureDenialConfusionThe Perfect Kiss
Encore:CeremonyBlue Monday
Encore 2:Temptation
― jimbeaux, Thursday, 30 December 2021 14:17 (four years ago)