New Order - Waiting For The Sirens Call

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The new New Order album Waiting For the Sirens Call is out on March 28th. A certain few who have heard it at a playback have been saying great things about it. Ana Matronic sings on one track "Jetstream" (which is meant to be the 3rd single) and the closing track "Working Overtime" apparently sees New Order go glam rock. Other tracks include first single "Krafty", post-club comedown track "Road to Ruin" and the title track which is due to be the second single. It's meant to be more dance oriented than "Get Ready", one listener said it's maybe on a par with "Technique"

I am positively drooling at the prospect of it being on a par with "Technique".

Neil FC (Neil FC), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

yawn

rentboy (rentboy), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)

lawn

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Like Technique? :-) Spencer to thread!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope that will be the exact title so we are forever confused as to whether they mean "Waiting, For The Sirens Call" or "Waiting For The Siren's Call" or some other variation.

Let's also hope it's less bland than "Get Ready".

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

How is that confusing?

claremont, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad someone started a new thread for this. The other one was getting a bit unwieldy. Thanks Neil. I'm not sure I really want it to be "more dance oriented" but hey, I'm gonna reserve judgement.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 05:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure how I feel about a "more dance oriented" record. I wonder if there is any correlation between one's attitude toward this and one's opinion of "Get Ready" (a very "rock-oriented" record). ILM is deeply divided between the "Get Ready is crap" and "Get Ready is the 2nd or 3rd best NO album". Maybe the first group are more enticed by the prospect of a "Technique Part II".

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)

How is that confusing?

Haha, I'm demented, as I kept reading that essentially as "Waiting, [Because] The Sirens Call" without the aprostrophe, which is stupid.

www.neworderonline.com says:

It's been rumoured that the reason why there is no apostrophe in "Sirens" is because the band couldn't agree where it should go, and Saville decided that there wouldn't be any.

But then...

will be called Waiting For The Sirens Call, except that they did add the apostrophe in "Siren's".

< / pedantry >

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm ready and willing to be pleasantly surprised. Get Ready was enjoyable, but there was nothing really great on it - and the lyrics were terrible (and know well, that I really love a lot of Barney's earlier lyrics!).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

crystal and the last song apart, get ready was lumpen stodge. 60mph and rock the shack ... come on, this is the band that wrote temptation and 1963 and leave me alone and vanishing point. what the fuck did they think they were playing at?

by "dance-oriented" i'm hoping very much they mean it's a progression from here to stay, which was a blistering return to form and is really the last piece of hope on to which i cling. but i can't even force myself to actually get excited about this album, which is a tragedy.

and the missing apostrophe is fucking me off more than i can explain.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

One more time, Barney: YOU CAN BUY HONEY WITH MONEY!

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

ILM is deeply divided between the "Get Ready is crap" and "Get Ready is the 2nd or 3rd best NO album". Maybe the first group are more enticed by the prospect of a "Technique Part II".

I'm in the "I'm glad that they're not making another rock-oriented album, but I wish they wouldn't try to immitate Technique either" camp.

I'll try to stay as open minded as possible.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)

another rock-oriented album

oh, was that what get ready was meant to be?

:)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i want another Brotherhood. really i do.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)

brotherhood is an incredible album. it has breathtaking melodies and is suffused with genius throughout. "as it is when it was" would probably make its way into my all-time new order top ten. i think it pisses all over low-life, to be honest.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

never "got" the low-life love. it's SO patchy

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

and the missing apostrophe is fucking me off more than i can explain.

OTM. Trying to be artistic with apostrophes or lack thereof is not very clever or interesting the first place, let alone the fact it's been DONE before, countless times.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Also I think one of the strongest things about Get Ready was the fact it wasn't just a "rock-oriented" or "dance-oriented" album - it had variety. I personally wouldn't want another Technique, but the idea of squabbling about this or that NO album at this point doesn't appeal to me.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)

If NO can't get the apostrophe right, that puts them in poor company with that ACDC record, Razors Edge or whatever. And didn't Oasis have an album with an equally un-smart name. Golly that really bugs me for some reason.

BlastsOfStatic (BlastsofStatic), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, i think that's part of what bugs me here: NO's disregard for grammar puts them on a par with oasis ("standing on the shoulder of giants", wasn't it?) ... and of course part of my problem with get ready (sorry bimble) was that it did sound like new order feeding off the reeking carcass of britpop. so already my mind's set up for more of the same.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

The key here is who's produced it - any ideas?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe, New Order are waiting for 2 or more sirens to call: ECHO ECHO

They are not waiting for a siren to call !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post: brian eno.

oh, no, hang on. that didn't happen. fuck. leckie or street or some such past-it twiddler. since when did fucking new order need producers, eh?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post: sirens' call, then, surely?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Stephen Street produced it - so draw your own conclusions.

BTW: NO completists may be interested in the shameless comp on my blog: stephenage.typepad.com

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

but then aren't they missing a preposition?
it would be "waiting for the sirens TO call"
if that "to" isn't in there it should be "waiting for the sirens' calls"
etc

anyway you slice it, their just dum

rentboy (rentboy), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

What about the people who love both Get Ready and Technique and are completely psyched about a Technique II to go along with Movement II?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

correct better title: "waiting for the sirens TO call"

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

What about the people who love both Get Ready and Technique and are completely psyched about a Technique II to go along with Movement II?

Hurrah!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

xx-post: in what possible universe was "get ready" even remotely related to "movement"? one is the sound of a young, scared band taking their first tentative footsteps and accidentally redefining the parameters of sound. the other is three bored men in a studio, scrabbling for ideas under the sofa.

sorry, sorry. i'll stop now.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't agree with grimly - I think Get Ready is just fine obv apart from Rock The Shack. I can even appreciate 60 Mile Per Hour. The rest of the album is ace in its own way, but it's a different kind of beast from their prime 80's recds and can't really be judged alongside them.

So while it may sound contradictory given how much I like Get Ready, I am somewhat disappointed by New Order's 'comeback'. It's pretty clear that they are set on cruise control and not really willing to experiment and create *new* things any more. The live experience how is fairly shite - they seem content to trot through pre-programmed versions of all the big ones with Barney warbling along to an autocue. They don't even program their own stuff any more. For anyone who saw them anytime from 80-88, it's a pretty tame experience - they always used to fly by the seat of their pants and created great music that way, both live and in the studio.

What I'd love more than anything from them in 2005 would be a self-produced double album with some real risk-taking experimantation. Think Tago Mago. I shouldn't write off the new LP yet, but it won't be like this. One thing I agree with grimly fiendish about - I think Gill's departure saw some of the magic evaporate.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i said this on the barren wasteland formerly known as alt.music.new-order and i'll say it again here: i believe the band were at their best when they were limited by technology; when they were forcing themselves to come up with new ways to overcome those limitations. these days they've allowed themselves to become lazy, because the whole experience is too easy for them.

as for gillian: i argued long and hard on a.m.n-o about this. the wonderful, beautiful thing about new order was that they were more a gang than a band; they were four people who fought and hissed and spat at each other but still came together time and time again to make beautiful music. i still don't know exactly who played what on each song; and i don't care, because it doesn't matter. when one member goes from a group like that, the dynamic is destroyed.

what really galls me is that joy division became new order when ian died because they couldn't carry on as the same band without a key member. i'm sorry, but i can't accept hooky/barney/steve plus phil cunningham as new order, because by their own criterion it's a different entity. yes, ok, joy division was a long time ago ... but some standards should be kept, surely?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Agree totally re: Gillian.
Probably agree re: technology.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

in what possible universe was "get ready" even remotely related to "movement"? one is the sound of a young, scared band taking their first tentative footsteps and accidentally redefining the parameters of sound. the other is three bored men in a studio, scrabbling for ideas under the sofa.

Listen to the guitar tones and album flow of Movement and Get Ready back to back and tell me there aren't similarities. The fact that you like one and dislike the other does not automatically make any positive comparison between them invalid; furthermore holding every New Order album up to the "redifine the parameters of sound" criteria is foolish.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Between "Get Ready" and the title track from Twisted Tenderness, I can no longer tell the difference between a new New Order record and a new Electronic record.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

(Pre-emptive response: If you aren't holding every New Order album up to that arbitrary standard, why did you mention it in the first place?)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:07 (twenty-one years ago)

eh, what? i mentioned it because movement did it, that's why. god damn, someone's defensive! responding before i've even had a chance to reply! :)

i'm sorry: to these ears the guitars on movement sound like a frenzied maelstrom. the guitars on get ready sound like a sludgy mess. the songs on movement are paranoid and edgy. the songs on get ready are contented and fat. the electronics on movement are cold and sparking. the electronics on get ready are pro-tooled to a dull sheen.

etc.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

To my ears, "Get Ready" is the spitting image of "Brotherhood" -- cutting/slashing guitar playing, very trebly, many guitar-driven songs, low on 4/4 dance beats. Which is why I was very confused when grimly fiendish said that he wanted a "Brotherhood II".

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Re. the apostrophe. They couldn't agree where it went. Then Peter Saville who's doing the sleeve art said, "Well, I'll not put it in then."

laticsmon (laticsmon), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

is billy corgan going to be on this one? No? then it will be better than get ready.

new order work best for me when they play with dance music, so this sounds good to me.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i like both albums but don't see too many similarities except that both are melancholic. though movement much more of course. it is sad and heavy whereas get ready is sad and light. being closed in a dark room against driving with 100 mph on a motorway around the world. both is depressing on the long run. but the second is more fun.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Couldn't care less about whether it's gonna be dancey or rockin'. As long as there's a song on it as good as "Crystal," I'll be happy. Good God was that an amazing song.

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Republic" is the melancholy follow-up to "Movement".
So, we have,

Get Ready = Brotherhood II
Republic = Movement II
Waiting for the Sirens Call = Technique II

Maybe the "Peter Saville Soundtrack" is "Low-Life II", on the basis of its similarities to "Elegia".

"Power, Corruption and Lies" is lonely.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Peter Saville who's doing the sleeve art

I am content. (Then again how could it be otherwise?)

is billy corgan going to be on this one? No? then it will be better than get ready.

You are evil, stinky and mean.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't forget Here to Stay. That was the New Order of Get Ready doing "dancey". And it was easily their best song since Regret. So if this album is in that kind of area, it could all be fantastic. I'm worried about the lack of Gillian too though. She was on Get Ready, wasn't she? And then just dropped out of the tour? Or am I wrong, has she been absent ever since Republic?

JimD (JimD), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

She was a little bit involved in Get Ready, but not much.

**the electronics on movement are cold and sparking. the electronics on get ready are pro-tooled to a dull sheen. **

Yes. But such is the nature of making a record in 2003 vs 1981. I agree with the contented and fat comment.

I hope new guest 'stars' this time. They could hardly have chosen worse than the gurning fool Gilliespie and the clueless Corgan. At least Corgan didn't ruin the majestic Turn My Way with his braying.

I am a bit uncomfortable with holding subsequent albums up to the standard of Movement. For me it is their best, but really you can't compare any of them from Movement to Technique as their aesthetic was changing constantly and they were pushing forward with new technology and new ways to work. All are great, but different. In retrospect, maybe the rot set in with Republic - not wholly bad, but not the record of a pioneering band. It worries me that S. Hague is still involved.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

correct better title: "waiting for the sirens TO call"

even better title: "waiting for the call of the sirens"

What I'd love more than anything from them in 2005 would be a self-produced double album with some real risk-taking experimantation. Think Tago Mago.

Jesus H., Dave you make me swoon! If only it were true!

I would like to politely suggest that we get away from the idea of hoping for another Movement. Without Hannett around, and without them grieving the loss of their singer, there is just no WAY we are going to get another one of those. It's still my favourite album of theirs, I understand the sentiment, but really - "another Movement" just can't happen.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I meant : I hope NO guest stars this time.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish NO would start doing their own programming/producing/changing their live sets but I honestly believe that dealing with all of that is what led the band to hate each other, hate playing live. etc. That and cocaine. Lots of cocaine.

major jingleberries (jingleberries), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Gill's departure saw some of the magic evaporate

I'm sorry all! Me and Barney can no longer tolerate working together. Maybe I would be persuaded if he asked me back.

If you are reading Bernard, I have something I want to say to you:

A cold that sleeps within my heart
It tears the earth and sun apart
But that's the way that I can win
A victim of your evil sin
You've lost the hold you've had on me
By causing the changes that you never see

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

You can hear "Krafty" right here. It's the fourth song played.

Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 22 January 2005 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Currently enduring some mighty boring, crappy dance music in anticipation of "the fourth song played". Was that first one Madonna? YUCK!!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:18 (twenty-one years ago)

AND IT'S ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Damnit I need a bottle of champagne right now.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

wantthealbumnowwantthealbumnowwantthealbumnowwant the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now want the album now

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, that really does sound quite good, doesn't it?

jsk baby (jsk baby), Saturday, 22 January 2005 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

uh, no, it sounds terrible?

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know. Maybe I'm just too excited to hear it properly. I'm going to willingly endure the crappy dance music again and try to find out.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

No, it's good. It is. It's got a great tune. As a single, I much prefer it to Crystal. The call-and-answer vocals for the chorus is an interesting switch, too. I can't tell if it's Barney doing the echoed vocal line or someone else.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 08:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I'd never bought 'Get Ready'.

Peter Stringbender (PJ Miller), Saturday, 22 January 2005 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

to be half as good as "technique " means it's brilliant , they should've released 6 singles off technique
############################################
"Working Overtime" apparently sees New Order go glam rock.
new order do glam rock - does that mean it's like "rock the shack " ?
off the "get ready "album?

bernard hook, Saturday, 22 January 2005 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Between "Get Ready" and the title track from Twisted Tenderness, I can no longer tell the difference between a new New Order record and a new Electronic record.
-- Joseph McCombs (jmccomb...), January 12th, 2005.
the difference is sales and $$$$$$$$$
p.s. i love electronic

bernard hook, Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

hey, i like that "weekend" song. they play it in my gym.

ok, ok. i admit. i am pathetically excited about hearing this fucking "krafty".

oh, that's a shock. the crappy R1 stream has just cut out on me. for FUCK'S SAKE

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

hang on. if the stream's cut out, i must be listening to the live stream somehow. thank fuck i noticed. right, let's try again.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

mere words cannot explain how much i loathe the bbc and their fuckstick radio player. listening to fucking last night's pete tong should not be this difficult.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

and their jingles suck. "AND NOW ... PETE TONG". oh, get on with it.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

holy fuck!

it's brotherhood-era NO all over again! happy, happy fucking day!

good god. that was really quite wonderful. wow. i wish i'd audio-hijacked it. or at least listened to it on proper speakers, not the laptop.

it's already stuck in my head.

fantastic. proper new order, doing what they're good at.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

This song is great AND it would fit in really well on Get Ready.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 22 January 2005 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i've worked out what it reminds me of! "deep sleep" (or whatever it's called) by red turns to, released on factory in the mid-nineties. a band formed by one of new order's roadies, IIRC.

yes.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

it's brotherhood-era NO all over again!

Interesting you should mention that. There was a bit I think towards the end where they used some synth noise or something that made me immediately think "Brotherhood". And the BBC's radio player thing really does suck. I used to be able to use the buttons on it, too, like pause and skip ahead 5 min. but now none of the buttons even work. Once it's on I'm just stuck with it. And the sound quality is just...ugh. I've streamed from other places like WFMU and I swear it wasn't near that bad.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Fuck yeah! Deep Sleep! I can see that!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sure you meant "released mid-80's"

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, sorry, of course i meant mid-eighties. i'm an arse.

wonder how well this song's propagating on P2P right now?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I shall listen to gamelan music while waiting for the stream to catch up properly.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, here we go. Hey, it's great! Summery even though this is not summer. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

No Spencer posting yet about this? That'll change.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it's brotherhood-era NO all over again! happy, happy fucking day

Seriously grimly, you've got to explain why you're freaking about this song and "Brotherhood" but still don't like "Get Ready".

Sonically, "Get Ready" = "Brotherhood"

OK, it's playing now!

That's an amazing track, probably better than all of the "Get Ready" singles. As for the "Brotherhood" comparisons, the melody during the verses reminded be of the chorus in "As It Is When It Was".

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 22 January 2005 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously grimly, you've got to explain why you're freaking about this song and "Brotherhood" but still don't like "Get Ready".

i'm thinking. i'm trying.

there's a lightness and deftness about krafty that i just don't hear on get ready. the entire album sounds forced, lumpen, like it's made up of sewn-together pieces of songs; krafty sounds like it's burst fully formed from the new order song machine (which is a good thing, naturally).

there's a brightness and edginess about the brotherhood sound that i don't hear on get ready either. if i knew more about these things, i'd say it was all to do with dynamics, the space in the songs, but i can't explain that any further. all i can say is that the recordings on get ready sound dull, matt, dead ... and that brotherhood and krafty sound vibrant and chiming.

also: the melodies have a lot to do with it. krafty is classic new order (i mean, seriously, there were two points where hooky did exactly what i'd expect; predictable, yes, but in a joyous and life-affirming way), while get ready sounds like new order playing other people's rather tedious songs.

you know what's gonna happen now, don't you? i'm gonna love this and think the rest of the album's cack, heh. but woh, has this given me hope.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 January 2005 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, boys. Let's not start the Get Ready wars.

Summery even though this is not summer. :-)

It's Sumnery! Okay, that was bad.

you know what's gonna happen now, don't you? i'm gonna love this and think the rest of the album's cack, heh. but woh, has this given me hope.

Well, you see Crystal is my least fave track on Get Ready, so the phenomenon you speak of has certainly crossed my mind.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 January 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

how long till the new order song comes on?

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 22 January 2005 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

did that dickface just say he has a copy of the new daft punk?

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 22 January 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Yup.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

it comes in a couple of seconds after the 12 minutes 10 second mark

brontosaur, Saturday, 22 January 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

There hasn't been a NO track this good since the Republic era. It's the first thing since maybe "Regret" that sounds... effortless. No forced "rock", no forced "dance", lyrics aren't just shoehorned in from out of the air. And I'm in love all over again.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 23 January 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Sounds a bit like something from Raise the Pressure but even better!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 23 January 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes it reminded me of Raise The Pressure, too.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

this is madness!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

YES. But WHAT KIND OF MADNESS EXACTLY?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

a dogs and cats living together kind of madness! that song can be good or it can be new order but it can't be both!

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Oooh, I see. We will just have to call in the mad scentist, Christ Martin of Coldplay to come and cure you of your ills! [Throws lever on Frankenstein machine]

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 23 January 2005 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Offical PR is here, like : (And look there's an apostrophe now!)


“WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL”

RELEASED 28TH MARCH 2005 THROUGH LONDON RECORDS

After the planet-shagging success of 2001’s “Get Ready” and 2002’s ‘this-is-how-you-do-it’ four CD boxset “Retro”, Manchester’s finest ever band, New Order, return with their new, hotly anticipated album, “WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL”. Showcasing New Order’s unique ability to both shake the dancefloor and rock the hardest, Sirens is that rare thing: an album for everyone. Its eleven songs take in influences as diverse as electro, rock, dancehall and punk, all bound together by New Order’s cool romance, diamond-hard modernity and wild, unparalleled musicality.

First single, “KRAFTY”, is bass-driven, machine-like, ridiculously catchy. The title track is wistful and sublime, considered by the band to be one of the best tracks they’ve ever made. Then there’s the perfect pop of “JETSTREAM’ (Bernard’s vocals augmented by Scissor Sister Ana Matronic); the wry, hilarious regret of “MORNING NIGHT AND DAY”; “I TOLD YOU SO”’s reckless ragga lope; the Iggy stomper “WORKING OVERTIME”; the anthemic, tuneful “ROAD TO RUIN”. “WAITING FOR THE SIRENS’ CALL” is the diverse, devastating, delicious sound of a great band at its peak.

This energetic, upbeat album was carefully recorded over seven months, using a ‘Who’s Who’ of producers, including Stephen Street, John Leckie, Stuart Price and New Order themselves. A sustained burst of song-writing by the band resulted in 18 completed songs, a first for New Order – Bernard: “We usually do just enough for an album, ten songs and it’s done”; the seven tracks left off “Sirens” are so strong that they are likely to form the basis of a future LP. Phil Cunningham, recruited as guitarist when New Order took “Get Ready” on the road, had the privilege of being invited by Bernard, Hooky and Steve to join the song-writing process for this new record. “I found it strange at first,” he says, “because New Order use a lot of technology. And sometimes they reject stuff because it sounds ‘too New Ordery’”.

“It’s the heart and the soul of New Order that’s important,” explains Bernard. “If something sounds like a pastiche, that’s not good enough.”

Rejecting the obvious has always been New Order’s technique: in their 28 year career, they’ve changed the face of pop music on more than one occasion. As Joy Division, they ripped up rock’s rule book by making music that was heavy and subtle, glacial, yet full of lament: “Love Will Tear Us Apart” has just been chosen as one of The Brits 25 best songs ever written. Then, as New Order, they were light years ahead of the dance scene with the world’s best-ever-selling 12” single “Blue Monday”, before bringing Madchester to the masses with the platinum-selling album “Technique”. As an aside, they made the only cool football anthem ever made, “World In Motion” – it went to Number One – as well as having hits with various side projects such as Electronic, Monaco and The Other Two.

The New Order legacy is undeniable, yet the band keeps coming up with more. “Waiting For The Sirens Call” is so packed with pop tunes, it sounds like a Greatest Hits. Bernard’s lyrics cover computers, hangovers, the folly of man’s lust - and even Dracula’s castle (a reference to St Catherine’s, the Jane Seymour-owned studio where part of “Sirens” was recorded). His voice has never sounded better, Hooky’s mournful, gorgeous bass twists throughout, Phil’s guitars add warmth and depth, and Steven’s drumming and looping show the imitators how it’s done.

There is no other band that unites both “spotty students and football hooligans” (Bernard), as well as housewives and rock stars, the art set and the mainstream, indie-lovers and dance nutters. No other band that can wring such emotion from machines, or make guitars sound so fresh. Noone else is so spiky, so startling, innovative and inspirational; noone else makes pop music for clever people that hits the heart as well as the head. In 2005, when every other up-and-coming band cites Joy Division and New Order as inspirations, it’s fantastic to have the real deal back – and on such blistering form.


TRACKLIST (with production credits)

Who’s Joe? (produced by New Order)

Steve: “It’s a nice uptempo number, along the lines of Guilty Partner and Dream Attack. It came quite easily, it was deposited on earth fully formed, a lovely baby. And it’s got a funny clangy noise in it. My speciality.”

Bernard: “It reminds me of Joy Division, it’s got that heaviness. Who’s Joe? Absolutely no idea. To me, it’s the story of a tramp.”

Hey Now What You Doing (Stephen Street)

Bernard: “It’s fresh. It doesn’t remind me of anything we’ve done before. I was thinking of a lad from Moss Side when I was writing the lyrics.”

Phil: “It’s got power and it’s instant. It came from my guitar riff idea, so I like it, and it’s quite easy to play.”

Steve: “It’s daring of Bernard to try rhyming future and computer. I admire that.”

Waiting For The Sirens’ Call (New Order)

Hooky: “Barney’s done really well with the vocals and the lyrics are really good. They’re about travelling, I think. It’s his yachting influence.”

Bernard: “It’s my favourite track. The backing track’s brilliant, Hooky’s bass is fantastic on it. It made me crap it a bit, because I thought, If I don’t get the vocals right, I’m going to destroy a classic song. I don’t know quite what’s it about. Could it be about death? Or infidelity. It’s not about me in particular.”

Krafty (John Leckie)

Hooky: “I was working with Hybrid, and wrote this middle bit of a track, and thought, That’s too good to leave there, I’m having that, so I asked them and they said, That’s fine. And it turned into Krafty. And it’s just great.”

Steve: “It started as a jam, a bit like Lonnie Donegan. But then we put electronic noises in there.”

I Told You So (New Order)

Bernard: “I was on holiday on my boat in the Caribbean, tuning in a shortwave radio into all these mad stations. The beats were fantastic, really interesting. So I recorded some stuff off the radio, and used it as the inspiration for a song. I like it because it starts off with these dancehall beats and then turns into Velvet Underground somewhere in the middle, and I like both of those things.”

Phil: “It’s bonkers, isn’t it?”

Morning Night And Day (Stephen Street)

Phil: “It reminds me of Primal Scream, the sentiment and the rocky Stones-y vibe. But it’s actually quite programmed.”

Bernard: “That one is autobiographical. It is definitely about my life. My life as it used to be. Actually, it’s about Phil’s life.”

Hooky: “Oh god. When you get to our age, the hangovers are so massive, they last for about a week.”

Dracula’s Castle (John Leckie)

Hooky: “That started as a jam with me, Phil and Steve.”

Bernard: “St Catherine’s, where this was partly recorded, was built by Henry VIII for one of his illegitimate daughters. It was a courthouse for a bit and I wrote lyrics in this room where people were judged and tried. It had an old fireplace, and was all lit by candles. It was a creative room but very spooky. That’s why Dracula’s castle is in there.”

Jetstream (Stuart Price)

Bernard: “I must admit I was a bit dubious when Ana Matronic was suggested as a singer, but she did a fantastic job, really lifted the song. We knew it was a good track, but it needed something that we couldn’t give it.”

Phil: “We were aware we had mainly rock tracks, so we consciously wrote something to dance to.”

Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Stuart Price)

Bernard: “A very difficult song to write, with a tortuous route to get to where it is now! I can’t categorise it, but loosly, it is a dance record. Get Ready had no dance tunes, which we were very aware of, especially after we toured that record in 2001. It’s important to keep the balance.

Hooky: “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”.

Turn (Stephen Street)

Hooky: “We wrote this when it was miserable and rainy, and we wanted to cheer ourselves up!”

Phil: “It’s very upbeat and summery”.

Working Overtime (Stephen Street)

Hooky: “I think this should be a single. It’s dead rocky. I play it when I DJ and people go mad.”

Steve: “I love this one because it’s based around my drum riff. It sounds a bit Stoogey, but it’s not meant to be. But most of music is thievery isn’t it? Sometimes I hear a song on the radio and think, This is good, is it one of ours? Then the red mist descends and I think, You robbing bastards!”

Bernard: “I was worried that things were getting a bit flowery and melodic and chordy, so it’s great to have a track like this, with a dumb one finger riff. You should never forget that the best music is simple and you don’t have to be a great musician to make it.”

INTERVIEW/BIOG WRITTEN BY MIRANDA SAWYER, Jan 2005.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 24 January 2005 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

most of those descriptions don't inspire me at all. but i remember reading similar notes before "get ready" came out and thinking, ooh, that sounds top, so ... we'll see.

certainly, on the evidence of "krafty", i'm now really quite excited about this album. wonders, as they say, will never cease.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 24 January 2005 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Steve: “It’s daring of Bernard to try rhyming future and computer. I admire that.”

Oh boy...

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 24 January 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I admire alot of the shitty lyrics bernard throws out there and expects us to take seriously. takes balls man.

Im surprised theres so many tracks the band produced themselves. even more reasons to be excited about downloading the album on or near 3/28 due to lack of US release date.

Juan, the Magic Don (jingleberries), Monday, 24 January 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Good god, Dr. C. There were so many parts of that article that made me laugh with joy that I've now shed a few tears. I'm so relieved they are mentioning rock and diversity. If I was afraid of this album before, I'm not now. The whole idea of a song called "Dracula's Castle" cracks me up as well.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 24 January 2005 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"the seven tracks left off 'Sirens' are so strong that they are likely to form the basis of a future LP", oh fuck off.

Look, I want to believe it as much as anybody, but this is how hearts are broken.

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)

The single isn't too bad. Go to www.neworderonline.com and give it a listen. It sounds like a "Raise The Pressure" outtake with a tougher rhythm section. Is it me or is Barney getting more boyish and winsome as he ages? Is that what happens when you stop using coke and X?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

OTM

New Order = not prolific.

We're lucky enough to have 2 records in 5 years, not this 2 in 1 year insanity.

Juan, the Magic Don (jingleberries), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, it's like an Raise the Pressure track with the chorused bass which is pretty great (but yes very winsome which I love).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)

Well, after listening to Krafty I found myself singing the string and chime parts from All Day Long from Brotherhood, just a bit faster than usual. I think they're pretty closely related as far as basic tracks go. And then Krafty's vocal melodies remind me, more than anything else, of Shine from the first Monaco album. Production-wise, yep, definitely agree that it sounds similar to Raise The Pressure. None of these factors should be bad, but...I dunno, Krafty still feels like less than the sum of its parts, to me. It's a bit of a step backwards, and I'm a bit disappointed by that.

Ah well. No doubt I'll learn to love it in the space of about a week.

JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)

Haha, diff'rent strokes - I like "Krafty" more than anything on Get Ready (and I should note that I like a lot of their earlier rockin' tracks).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)

New Order = not prolific.

We're lucky enough to have 2 records in 5 years, not this 2 in 1 year insanity.

-- Juan, the Magic Don (still.beven...), January 25th, 2005.
i'd rather have a brilliant cd every four years than a crap album every year (week) like elton john or prince in the 90's

new waver, Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)

Would all the people baning this tired, incorrect horse about how Prince was crap in the 90s please fuck off until you learn something about music? Ok thx.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)

to be clear, i wasn't bitching about the idea of a quick successor to Sirens so much as the "IT'S JUST THAT GOOD, PEOPLE, 7 CLASSICS THEY DIDN'T EVEN NEED" hyperbole of puff piece

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)

I tell you what I think is wrong with Krafty - Bernard sounds too happy on it! What made Bernard's vocals great in the past is that he sounded doleful. It is quite a dilemma - obv. I don't want to wish unhappiness on the guy, but he just sounds so much better when he's sad. Hearing Krafty led me to revisit some other, newer New Order material. Here to Stay is absolutely fantastic, much better than anything on Get Ready and I think one of the things that make it good was that, for the verse at least, Bernard adopts a style not so dissimilar to that he uses on Blue Monday.

Also, his lyrics work better when they are more abstract or obscure. Two songs which are narrative in content, Love Vigilantes and All the Way, are the exceptions that prove the rule.

However, JimD is OTM re: Shine, which is prolly the best Monaco song.

MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

My favorite Monaco track (besides "What Do You Want from Me?") is actually "Lucky Jim" - I know it could pass for generic brit-pop, but there's something about it that's really nice.

Also a funny note, several Americans I talked to, when they first heard the opening lines to "Crystal" thought that New Order were talking about how much they liked crystal meth!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

x-post: coo, i thought barney sounded kinda abstracted/bored on "krafty" ... ie classic barney.

it gets better with each listen, that song, it really does. has anyone heard any other tracks? OMM were wanking on at the weekend about the one with ana matronic on it.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

The "this is how you do it" Retro box" ?

Miranda! I know you like NO, and that's a press release and all, but umm exaggeration?

Oh and isn't the new title a bit like "Standing on the shoulder of Giants" ?

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

looks like theyre doing GLASTONBURY.

piscesboy, Wednesday, 26 January 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

Miranda! I know you like NO, and that's a press release and all, but umm exaggeration?

Didn't she compile one of the discs?

kit brash (kit brash), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

She did compile one of the discs on retro.

I was recently informed today by a co-worker that mostly 15 year old asian girls like new order. Imagine that shit. I was never told.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 27 January 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)

NOW

http://www.neworderonline.com/Default.aspx
NewOrderOnline Radio - Tonight at 8pm EST (GMT-5) / Tomorrow at 4pm EST (GMT-5)
Today - 1:46:35 PM - Tune in tonight on Retroforward Radio for NewOrderOnline Radio.

You will be able to listen to the latest New Order interview, hear the latest news, listen to a few songs, and listen to a live show from Leuven 1985 in the second half of the show.

Don't forget to use the chatroom to interact with other listeners (chat room here and on Retroforward's website).

http://retroforward.com/radio/

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)

I used to post on neworderonline all the time back when Get Ready came out. It seems to have lost its appeal over the years.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 27 January 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

I think I'm going to skip class tomorrow (uh, today for the UKers) so I can catch that radio programme. Will anyone else here be around?

A few days ago I was THRILLED to learn that New Order are playing the Coachella festival in Southern California at the end of March. I was actually planning to take a trip down there sometime this spring and it seemed the perfect thing. I've actually never seen them even once in my life but had two near misses and had just resigned myself to the idea it was never meant to happen. Of course the fact that GANG OF FOUR are playing too is like having my cake, eating it, and having a second cake or something.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 06:52 (twenty years ago)

I really hope they make an effort onstage this time around. A few surprises pls (something from Movement, EGG, This Time of Night, Lonesome Tonight, Mesh, AIWWIW...), and less pre-set old favourites. It won't happen.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 27 January 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)

aaaah fuck. what time is that GMT? 1am? bollocks, that's no use. and tomorrow night's no use either.

actually, the very notion of "tomorrow/today" becomes enormously confusing when you're trying to factor in a five-hour time difference.

and the website says the show's on wednesday night. so ... it was *this* morning GMT?

fuck it. has anyone/can anyone audio-hijack this and circulate it?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 10:43 (twenty years ago)

Er...yeah, this has confused me a bit too. Well, 8pm EST should be about 1am GMT, I think. So if that's 1am tonight, and if I'm home in time, and if I'm not too drunk after Club FT, then I'll try to rip it. That's a lot of ifs though.

JimD (JimD), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

April 26 is the U.S. release date.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha! Yeah that whole time zone thing really perplexed me for awhile last night when I was dead tired. It was hard enough for me to figure out what time it would be here, let alone gather the fact 1 am probably isn't the best time for people over there! I wouldn't be surprised if it showed up on slsk, though - all those Peel tribute shows were available pretty quickly.

April 26 is the U.S. release date.

ONLY 50 million years after the UK date, as usual.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

less pre-set old favourites

I've never seen them live before! Barney! Play me some old live standbys, stat!

(actually I hope to god they don't do Blue Monday, unless they play some wild mutant version, but other than that I'd be psyched to hear Substance Live)

Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

DAMNIT! I think this whole radio show thing was one big hoax or misconception. There's nothing at all about it now on either neworderonline or the radio site. There's no evidence on the site that the show actually occured, either - the guy's playlist from yesterday mentions nothing about it. He did do a show on the 12th playing a bunch of New Order, but there was no interview or new songs played. What a crock. DJ Martian, where did you get this info from?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, I probably won't bother staying up late then, I guess. Or staying sober. :)

JimD (JimD), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

Sorted...the NOW upthead related to the early hours of today [UK time] i.e 8pm yesterday [US EST] ..i.e it's gone !

http://www.neworderonline.com/MessageList.aspx?ThreadID=17776

However apparently there will be a rebroadcast at 9pm thursday [UK time].

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

fuck! i need to get audiohijacking NOW, then ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

hmm. i just got the last five seconds of some knob playing a "new order megamix". now it's godawful 80s synthfunk.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

ah FUCK, that was it. i got the last five seconds of it. big hairy fucking cocks.

i'm off to watch fahrenheit 9/11.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

I missed it too, the whole thing. I needed to know before I left work today and there was not a single solitary thing on that radio site about it anywhere. Even their weekly schedule didn't show him as being the DJ for that time slot. The blurb at the top of the neworderonline site that I saw there last night was no longer there when I left work today. I shouldn't have to go digging in the forum for information like this. What the hell was that guy thinking?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)

Okay that last post sounded really nice and polite but it didn't start that way. I really wanted to smack someone at first. Bloody hell fuckbugger of a goddamn, etc.

But in retrospect, I actually don't feel so bad. Because very very strangely, there was a post just up above earlier by someone I can't now recall the name of that said he only had a 56K and had real problems with the connection, like 30 seconds of sound and 30 seconds of silence. And we all know how bad the BBC Player is, so we can only guess at what this might have been like. But I can't figure out why his post is deleted. I've never encountered a deleted post on ILM. What does it mean?? Is there a ghost in the machine?

I mean I have had a few drinks but I have NOT had enough to start imagining posts that spontaneously disappear.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)

cf. Cure "Cut Here" / New Order "Krafty"

Pale as a sheet.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 28 January 2005 05:45 (twenty years ago)

Are you hinting at the word 'goth'?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:31 (twenty years ago)

Would somebody leak this already, sheesh.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)

Would somebody leak this already, sheesh.

Seconded.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 28 January 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)

http://www.hipinion.com/leaks_view.php?lid=323

i guess it leaked

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Saturday, 29 January 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)

I WANT!! I WANT!!

Mr. Snrub, Sunday, 30 January 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

IT'S ON SOULSEEK!

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:08 (twenty years ago)

WHO'S GOT IT?!?!?!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)

IT MIGHT BE ON SLSK, BUT NO ONE IN THE ILM ROOM HAS IT

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)

ARGH I CAN'T MAKE NICOTINE WORK!!!

adam (adam), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)

Somebody called "IamDuck" ! I'm stuck in the queue, so I can't tell you whether it's real or not. I had a look around the torrent sites, but couldn't find it there. So I'll just have to wait. Oh the wait.

carson dial (carson dial), Sunday, 30 January 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)

anyone have it yet?

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Sunday, 30 January 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

http://www.crazypics.org/paranoia.jpg

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 30 January 2005 04:58 (twenty years ago)

yeah......i need this right now

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Monday, 31 January 2005 05:35 (twenty years ago)

I'm beginning to think this didn't really leak...

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 31 January 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

bother. That user has finally come online again, only for the files to come up as "not shared." And I haven't found it anywhere else, so yes, I'm beginning to think it was false alarm too. Sorry!

carson dial (carson dial), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 02:30 (twenty years ago)

I am so not surprised.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 02:42 (twenty years ago)

Heard a little bit of it, and it's definitely a hose job. Someone just retagged/renamed the Elefant album.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha! Yeah right. I've heard it and it sounds just like ELP.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

There's a real Foreigner influence. I think you guys will be pleased.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)

if anyone has this what is your username?

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)

IamDuck still seems to be the only person on all of slsk sharing this.

But it's actually this.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:03 (twenty years ago)

you have to be shitting me!

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Mister Snrub had downloaded a little bit of it, so I got what I heard from him. And it was most assuredly "Sunlight Makes Me Paranoid" and most assuredly NOT New Order.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)

Pitchfork-bashing is boring, so I'm not going to engage in that here ... but I'll let the WTF-ness of this "Krafty" stand on its own without comment.

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/tracks/05-02-01.shtml

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 3 February 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

jason crock is very aptly named. that is a very weird review. personally, i'd have spiked it :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Jason Crock also though Peter Hook's name is Stephen Hook, but the writeup was quickly corrected after I (and I assume several other people) sent in emails.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 3 February 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

That is just such a bad piece of music writing I don't even know where to start, really.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:17 (twenty years ago)

Those are my feelings exactly. Even the genre ("synth-pop"?) doesn't make sense (even in the context of his review).

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)

saville gets paid:

http://www.neworderonline.com/Gallery/NewOrder_KraftyFront4News.jpg

I kinda like it.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

I like it very much. I'm sure it's part of the same 'brand' as the record. More L.A.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

this one's bigger and shows the texture better:
http://images.warner.de/images-artists/WEA/New_Order/573616/1026632.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)

love love love the image.

hate hate HATE WITH AN UNHOLY HATRED the typography. vile seventies horror, and what's with the mixed-case stuff between band name and title?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)

The text almost looks like it was added as a last thought. Still, better than the Hollywood crap they were using for the Republic artwork.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

I loved the "Hollywood crap". The typography hardly deserves unholy hatred.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

Yeah - isn't that just the same typography as Lowlife? For some reason I'm not able to get a pic of Lowlife in here right now, but it's interesting the similarity, even down to the switch to lower case. I like the sleeve a lot, I just wish it had a little color to it.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:45 (twenty years ago)

It's rather Richter-ish.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

If it has been done by PSA, they tend to create a new typeface for each grouping of NO stuff.

coco, Friday, 4 February 2005 09:54 (twenty years ago)

Great great cover. I imagine the little star in the middle will be the common thread of theseries, just like the red stripe for 'Get Ready'.

'Republic' cover love seconded. One of my favorites, actually

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Friday, 4 February 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)

it's vaguely similar to "low-life" in that it's sans-serif, but, er, that's where the similarities end. low-life's typography is beautiful and exquisite and the cases make sense. this is skinny and eeuch ... look at the "a" in "krafty"! it's huge. it dwarfs everything.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

update: i've just been handed a promo copy of the single. plain white sleeve, silver text. but it's set over two decks (bottom left):

New Order
krafty

and thus the lower-case k doesn't rankle as much.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

New Order are fun to pastiche, as Hypo and I found out with 'The Perfect Kill'. Here's the demo, in which I channel Barney.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)

o how i wish i wasn't at work right now and could listen to that!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 February 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha! An argument about New Order AND typography. Grimly is in heaven!

alext (alext), Friday, 4 February 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

The more I think about it, the more proggy the title of the new album seems. It reminds of Piper at the Gates of Dawn, or something like that.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Friday, 4 February 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

Eavis opens his mouth:

http://www.gigwise.com/contents.asp?ContentID=4195
New Order @ Glastonbury

DJ Martian (djmartian), Friday, 4 February 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

Found a high-quality MP3 of "Krafty"

Ummm... Goddamn it's catchy. I've listened to it three times in a row.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

gmail?

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

it's vaguely similar to "low-life" in that it's sans-serif, but, er, that's where the similarities end

the O looks remarkably similar to low life's. That e looks really awkward. i do like the w, though, even though it is my least favorite letter of the alphabet these days.

john'n'chicago, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

It's really quite interesting what New Order fans will busy themselves with in lieu of a brand new album.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)

Album has actually leaked. Listening now. Very, Very good. Very New Order. Better than Get Ready and i loved Get Ready.

newOrderfanboy!, Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)

Are you in the ilm room?

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

no, i do have the Direct Connect client but i can't find/connect to the ILM room, happy to do it though

meagain, Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

what's your slsk user name?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

i'm on a mac and can't get the slsk client to work

check for user Davidii, he has it all

biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

make that slsk user "davidiii"

check there

if you're in seattle, i could arrange a cdr

biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

I'm in Seattle.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

YOUSENDIT

Patrick South (Patrick South), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

now you're talking

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)

I'm a good and friendly person. I really am.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)

you've got mail...


Some thoughts on first listen.

Comparisons to Technique don't hold except for overall quality of the tracks. Not a duff track until the last, Working Overtime. Lyrics are as good as Bernard Sumner can do with the exception of Krafty. Chiming guitar, Peter Hook up in your face, not enough programmed beats for my taste but overall, the rock moments on WFTSC are not as "rocky" as on Get Ready. Not sure i like the collaboration with Ana on Jetstream. Sounds as week as the Gwen Stephani track w/ Hooky and Bernard. Not a great track, but not bad either. WFTSC, the song, is perhaps the best on the album. Turn, track 10, should have been the closer, great lyrics, good vibe...would have been the new Dream Attack if it had finished the LP. Unfortunately, they finish with Working Overtime, a cross between Rock The Shack + Slow Jam with a touch of Lust For Life thrown in...not as barfable as either Rock the Shack or Slow Jam but it's a vibe killer. Should have been left off the LP and saved for a B-side. Other than that, it's fucking ace. I'm on my 2nd complete listen, in order and it sounds better already! Life just got a lot easier to deal with.

bg, Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)

mail received.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)

Hm, so the single cover looks great and the album sounds grand, then. Rah!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)

Goddammit, I REALLY want to hear this!!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

I'm in two user queues on slsk now ... I have the first track ...

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

You lucky bastard.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

*patiently waits*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 5 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)

what font is used on the Krafty single? i'm trying to do a sleeve for the LP with the Krafty cover with the album title in place of krafty. answers on postcards.

biznotic, Saturday, 5 February 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

ha, is it Comic Sans?

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 5 February 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

I got it. Hit me up -- barrylaser -- if you want a copy.

I'm halfway through listening to it now ... will comment when it's done.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

(missing track 3, though)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

Hey, I just signed online and you disappear, ya punk.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)

Also, some of the tracks use working titles, but the album is definitely not a fake.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:37 (twenty years ago)

And unfortunately, the missing song is the title track, which is the next single. Well, we take what we can get.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)

oh wow, that cover is fantastic! i'll second the richter comment and add a fritz lang.

it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

i've got the title track, maybe the best on the album. it's out there but if you can't get it, i'll email it or something. going to see the Sonics in a bit though so it'll have to be after 10pm PST.

biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

Only heard the first three tracks so far, and sadly I have way too much work to get done today to delve any further for now. But Sweet Christ, they were gorgeous! Barney really sounds a lot more self-assured or something, more inspired. And sometimes it even strangely reminds me of the best of that band I emailed you about once, Ned, the one I really used to like a lot? I don't want to name them here for fear of turning people off because not many people really appreciate that band. But anyway.

Seek and ye shall find. barflyjello

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)

And sometimes it even strangely reminds me of the best of that band I emailed you about once, Ned, the one I really used to like a lot?

Journey?

(I'm KIDDING.)

biznotic, if you could e-mail it to nedr@sbcglobal.net I admit I wouldn't mind.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)

Wow, you have a higher quality version and everything ...

xpost

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 00:53 (twenty years ago)

I still haven't heard the title track, but here are my initial thoughts:

-- it's a more upbeat version of "Republic". The sound and swagger of "Regret" is all over most of the WFTSC tracks
-- everyone who loved "Get Ready" will love WFTSC
-- everyone who hated "Get Ready" will probably like WFTSC very much. After a quiet period of about a year, in June 2006 somebody will start a thread entitled "Defend the Indefensible -- New Order's 'Get Ready'" and everyone will defend it with comments like "on second thought, a few of the WFTSC tracks aren't that different from the 'Get Ready' tracks. 'Get Ready' had some great moments'". A few people will hold out, however, by comparing "Working Overtime" to "Rock the Shack" (as per bg's very OTM comments), and claim that this one track sabotages everything and therefore they can't admit to liking "Get Ready", and maybe even WFTSC as well.
-- "I Told You So" is reggae, New Order-style. It's good.
-- "Jetstream" (with Ana from Scissor Sisters on vocals), is to "WFTSC"as "World" is to "Republic" -- it's more pop-dance than typical NO, and will probably be a single.
-- "Krafty" is their best single since "Regret", and might be one of the best five or six singles of their career.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)

Pretty much what he said but even more positive. Yay!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:41 (twenty years ago)

ned, you've got mail.

ok, this is battling Low Life already as my 2nd fav. New Order album. Technique being my fav. It's definitely the best thing they've done since 1989. Sounds like a collection of the best "album tracks" with Krafty and Jetstream being the only 2 that sound catchy and radio-friendly. album could use a pinch more on the keyboard front but the return of the acoustic guitar and the quality of bernard's lyrics catapult this to the top of my list. i assume many other people will rate this quite high in the newOrder catalogue. can't wait for the Jaques lu Cont remixes of Fast Synth/Guilt Is A Useless Emotion. can't help but wonder what it would have sounded like as a duet with Gillian. oh well.

biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)

can someone usendit?

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 08:09 (twenty years ago)

I'm honestly sorry man, but I just not in a position to do it right now.

I realize that out of sheer politeness it might be prudent for me to hold my tongue about the album. But some of Barry & bg's comments get me a little riled, and last I knew it was a free country (though probably not for much longer). So I'm gonna weigh in, damnit.

it's a more upbeat version of "Republic"

Barry, I think you should be careful. This might not seem like a good thing to everyone here involved, and I don't happen to agree with it. I refuse to compare this album to anything New Order have done previously EXCEPT Get Ready, and even then, only in a general sense. That said, I think it's joyous thing indeed when people feel inspired enough to try to predict the future as you did about the 2006 Get Ready thread! Well done, and hey...perhaps it will even come to pass.

The first thing that sticks in my craw here is the people who can't stand "Rock The Shack", and by extension, will no doubt diss "Working Overtime". For god's sake, people. What is wrong with ONE only ONE track on a New Order album where they just ROCK OUT in the most regular, normal sense of the words? I mean, I actually think "Working Overtime" might be better than Rock The Shack, if only because the lyrics have improved, there's more influences at work, and there's no Bobbie Gillespie involved. First time I heard it I thought "ha! they're trying to do a velvet underground - no, hell...the strokes! no...The fucking FALL! That's it! They're doing a little bit of FALL here! New Order doing the Fall! Did you ever think you'd live to see the day?" NO for god's sake it isn't ground breaking, but then neither is that new squeaky clean band of 18 year olds on the corner over there making music in the same style. It's a bit of FUN, NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.

My next point is to say that "Jet" or "Jetstream" (however they choose to name it, in the end) with Ana from Scissor Sisters, is absolute CRAP. I mean CRAP. Unbearably embarassing. Worse than anything on Get Ready. But yet it serves one very important purpose: making the track after it, "Fast Synth"/"Guilt Is A Useless Emotion" far more palatable. For that is the track where Bernard finally makes his worst lyrical bungle of the album: "Real love can't be bought/it is wild and can't be caught/real love can't be sold/it's another colour than gold" But really, if you can get past the lyric, it's not so bad, even if it does sound an awful lot like just another contemporary dance track for the chorus. It also makes the next track "Turn" sound EVEN BETTER BY COMPARISON! FINALLY BACK TO THE INARGUABLE UNBELIEVABLE BRILLIANCE, ETC.!

So without rhapsodizing too much about the rest of the album for now, I'll just wrap up with this:

Tracks that bothered me on Get Ready = 2
Tracks that bother me on WFTSC = 2

But if I compare the REST of both albums side by side, ignoring the tracks that bother me, I think this one is better, stronger, and more cohesive than Get Ready. And I believe there aren't as many lyrical pitfalls as there were on Get Ready, as well.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 09:55 (twenty years ago)

nevmind. i found it.

I do quite like "Jet" actually, on first listen.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)

BETTER THAN GET READY

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 10:22 (twenty years ago)

This might not seem like a good thing to everyone here involved, and I don't happen to agree with it. I refuse to compare this album to anything New Order have done previously EXCEPT Get Ready, and even then, only in a general sense.

I wasn't trying to get people involved, that was my honest description of the album. It's not nearly as guitar oriented as "Get Ready", and I disagree with the pre-release hype comparing it to "Technique". There's nothing remotely like "Fine Time", "Vanishing Point", or "Mr. Disco" on here. I don't hear pounding club tracks like those ones, I hear more pop-dance-y tracks like "World" and "Chemical".

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 12:06 (twenty years ago)

has anyone got these songs zipped? and is there any site on the net temporarily hosting them?

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

I need it soon.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 6 February 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

Fret not.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Hey I wish the album had some fretless bass too.

Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

I love how Bimble gets all worked up and defensive about the hate for "Working Overtime" that hasn't happened yet.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

Pre-emptive strike.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

I'm liking it so far...but I think it could use more synth and bass.

Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Ned, would you be so kind as to send it to me too?

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

At the address shown by my username.

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

if someone could send the album, or tracks, to me too it'd be greatly appreciated.

william, it was really nothing, Sunday, 6 February 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

as posted by Brimble:

The first thing that sticks in my craw here is the people who can't stand "Rock The Shack", and by extension, will no doubt diss "Working Overtime". For god's sake, people. What is wrong with ONE only ONE track on a New Order album where they just ROCK OUT in the most regular, normal sense of the words?

---the problem is, i don't listen to New Order for rock songs. I didnt' collect every 12", CD single, LP etc to listen to rock music. rock sucks the cock of the devil and i didn't obsess over newOrder to hear their One Rock Song. I hated RTS and Slow Jam on Get Ready but Working Overtime doesn't make me ashamed to be a newOrder fan like those 2 did. I'd rather have them put Working Overtime on a single or as a hidden track because it completely destroys the mood that they perfectly built up over the first 10 tracks. It's a throwaway song that the Order think is "fun" and a nod to their influences but it should be left off the album proper.

as posted by Bimble:
My next point is to say that "Jet" or "Jetstream" (however they choose to name it, in the end) with Ana from Scissor Sisters, is absolute CRAP. I mean CRAP. Unbearably embarassing. Worse than anything on Get Ready.

---I would have strongly agreed with this yesterday morning when i had only heard that song 1 or 2 times but the more i listen to it in the context of the LP, i find it quite pleasant. It's not the best on the LP and i'm a bit disappointed at Stuart Price/jacques lu cont's contributions, but i think you need to give it a few more listens. I am opposed, in general, to collaborations on New Order records and have only recently begun to accept Turn My Way as a good song. I hate Billy Corgan with a passion and thought Bobby Gillespie's contribution was worthless. Ana Scissors should have never been invited to perform in the first place. Thank god Dawn Zee got left at home because she nearly ruined Republic and Get Ready for me.

One thing i can say is, please listen to the album in order a few times to appreciate the whole thing. Hearing the songs one by one, out of order, fails to produce the same kind of awe that listening to the LP as it was arranged by the band. It makes a difference.

biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

TS: people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on NO taking a bit of the piss on "Rock the Shack" VS people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on their Billy Corgan hatred even though he only sings two lines on the record??

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

"jet" is great!

i like how this album is sequenced.

it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

Dawn Zee didn't sing on Republic did she?

MarkH (MarkH), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)

one of my favorite things about new order is that sometimes you just can't tell whether they are taking the piss or not.

it's tricky (disco stu), Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

What about people who love Get Ready DESPITE newOrder taking the piss on Rock The Shack and Corgan on Turn My Way? It's Slow Jam that stands out as the real loser on Get Ready. The sessions version of Rock The Shack blows the LP mix out of the water and makes it listenable to me. I don't mind N.O. taking the piss, i love Every Little Counts, but i do mind them doing bogus rock tracks. they aren't a rock band and they fail miserably when the try to be one.

TS. People who love New Order regardless vs. People who base their opinion of the band on a handfull of tracks over a 20year career.

biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

she's not credited on the album but i assume that's her doing backing vocals. she definitely did some shows during the short Republic tour.

biznotic, Sunday, 6 February 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

Can anyone gmail it to me or send it via soulseek? user:bscrubbins.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

coo ur. i have got to hear this. but you know what? i'm waiting till i hear a release copy or promo. i just don't trust leaked albums. i really don't.

still, from what people are saying here, it'll be one to savour. yum.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

Title track!

Classic Barney: the vocal melody with "...and I don't know where to turn when you're gone..." = shivers and tears.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

Simon is worried he will proclaim it an astonishing return to form, the kind of album only New Order could make, and then discover that the leaked version is actually a collection of Beloved outtakes from 1993.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

mmmm, beloved out-takes from 1993 ... mmmm!

actually beloved out-takes from 1986 would be preferable

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

ah shit, you can't put in fake HTML tags here, i forgot. that last sentence was meant to have clever shit about rockism in it. fuck it. this M83 album is playing havoc with my brain.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 6 February 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

I love the song that might be titled "Guilt is a Useless Emotion" and might be titled "Fast Synth" that has the chorus "I want your love/ i need your love"

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

It's called "Guilt" etc.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:29 (twenty years ago)

muchos gracias.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)

Ned, you might just be the most unsurpassably great man in the universe! Thanks!

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and I can use .aac files, so please send the rest of the album when you have a free moment. Much appreciated.

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

Ned, you might just be the most unsurpassably great man in the universe! Thanks!

Yes, yes I am. ;-) But please, keep the followups on private mail!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)

Sorry Ned. Oops I've done it again...

AdrianB (AdrianB), Sunday, 6 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

I love how Bimble gets all worked up and defensive about the hate for "Working Overtime" that hasn't happened yet.

I was mainly responding to what bg had said, but you are right I probably got a little too worked up and excited.

rock sucks the cock of the devil

Actually I don't think anyone would really argue with that! The devil, rock and cock seem to go together quite well!

they aren't a rock band and they fail miserably when the try to be one.

I take it you were never a Joy Division fan, then? Just curious. Mmm..."Interzone" seems to be playing in my head at the moment. Wait...now I hear "Novelty"...I might just have to pull these out.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

Also...

TS: people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on NO taking a bit of the piss on "Rock the Shack" VS people who hate "Get Ready" because they're abnormally fixated on their Billy Corgan hatred even though he only sings two lines on the record??

hahahahahaha! OMG Billy Corgan BREATHED on it! The VILE UNCLEAN THING!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 February 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)

The reason I dislike the Billy Corgan cameo so much on "Get Ready" is that he has such a distinctive voice that he takes me right out of the record. Not that I hate him or anything. I just like New Order - and Barny's voice - a lot better.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 7 February 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)

I take it you were never a Joy Division fan, then? Just curious. Mmm..."Interzone" seems to be playing in my head at the moment. Wait...now I hear "Novelty"...I might just have to pull these out.

-- Bimble... (bimble87...), February 6th, 2005.

are you saying Joy Division are ROCK? if so, you and i have totally different opinions of what rock music is. I am in fact a big JD fan but don't consider them to be RnR in the slightest. How can you compare Rock The Shack and Working Overtime to the Joy Division sound? I think you need to pull out the Heart And Soul box set and rethink your position.

biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)

for the record, i haven't skipped Working Overtime yet and it's starting to grow on me. not nearly as bad as i thought it was on first listen. I stand by my statement that it doesn't belong on the album though. It just doesn't sound right in context. Maybe i'd have loved it if it had been a B-side but as the album closer, it ruins the glorious feeling the other tracks built up. Right or wrong, that's my opinion. It's not a bad song, but it doesn't flow with the rest of the album.

biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)

How can you compare Rock The Shack and Working Overtime to the Joy Division sound?

Well, I didn't. Although I do think the guitar sound on Rock The Shack reminds me of some of the earliest JD (i.e. Warsaw). But I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree because I simply can't see how anyone can say Joy Division weren't a rock band, or at least that they had the capability to be. What kind of music does "Interzone" sound like to you? I'm not trying to be belligerent here, I'm just baffled that somehow you can place "RTS" & "Working Overtime" in the "rock" category, and yet not a single piece of music Joy Division ever did.

And sure I can understand if someone feels that "Working Overtime" spoils a certain continuity of the album. But then I feel that way about Jetstream - it just doesn't belong on there.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 7 February 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)

Bimble, i really like arguing/discussing music. i can be the devil's advocate or not. either way i love a good heated discussion. we should get together in Seattle and discuss this in person.

I do not like the Warsaw stuff and prefer Closer to Unknown Pleasures, although i really like Unknown Pleasures too. You have my number, call sometime if you want to chat about MCR's finest export.

biznotic, Monday, 7 February 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

Bimble, i really like arguing/discussing music. i can be the devil's advocate or not. either way i love a good heated discussion. we should get together in Seattle and discuss this in person.

Well, I'm glad you feel that way. I really wasn't interested in this getting ugly, particularly as we just met!

I do have your number and would like to get together sometime, sounds good.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 7 February 2005 02:11 (twenty years ago)

Jetstream >>>>>>>>>>> Working Overtime.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Monday, 7 February 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

working overtime is a pretty shocking departure from anything else the band has put out.. its fun tho. I like it.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 06:01 (twenty years ago)

I can't express how delighted I am that I spent all weekend finding anything but New Order marked up as such. nnngnnnggnnng.

coco, Monday, 7 February 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit. I cant believe how great Guilt, etc is! I like Turn alot too.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

I like every single song on this record. There are a couple unfortunate lyrics as usual (the "can't get no satisfaction" thing, and also "hey joe" bugs me), but much more often than not, they're inspired and swoonful, and the music is amazing straight through. Even the last track is fun and not surprising considering very early Joy Division, their (and everyone else's) stated love for the Stooges, and hanging out with Gillespie et al. I don't understand any hate for "Jetstream" as it's like any of their souled-out tracks.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

There's only a handful of cringe worthy lyrics on here, most of them in Working Overtime. I think Barneys vocals are fantastic. I still need to find tracks 1 and 3..

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

I should say that the only part of the "Hey Joe" thing I don't like is the actual "Hey Joe" part. What's with these rockist references?!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

can anyone hook a man up? anotherdimension at gmail

heywood jablomi (heywood), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)

I can when I get home in 2 hrs or so.. But Im missing a couple tracks.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)

When did Gillian turn into a man?

Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

my thanks to whichever ILM roomer was sharing this on slsk last night. somone5000? (I am new to this game)

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 10:24 (twenty years ago)

When did Gillian turn into a man?
-- Aaron W (nineoclockdro...), February 8th, 2005.
during the "stalefish" video for the other two

La Camilla Henemark, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)

Holy shit. I cant believe how great Guilt, etc is! I like Turn alot too.

Totally agree, these two track are the proper guts of the album I think. It's weird that the best bit seems to come three quarters of the way through though.

I'm "Jimdoo" on slsk, if anyone wants to grab from me.

JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)

Anyway, since Phil Cunningham is now in the band and people have been asking a bit about Marion, here ya go:

A thread to talk about Marion, the band (c or d?)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Can someone email it to me, as well?

Any file format is fine.

Edward Bax (EdBax), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

Scenestars, which is perhaps the most bloated self-important example of an mp3 blog anywhere, has posted THREE album tracks ( http://scenestars.net/2005/02/new-order-krafty.php ) from Waiting For The Sirens Call.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

Count me among those ILMers who rate Get Ready as New Order's best album, or at least equally as good as Low-Life, Brotherhood, and Technique. Substitute the amazing b-side Player in the League for Rock the Shack, and it really would be their best. And the two tracks I have heard from Sirens are pretty damn good, too. New Order are giving Echo and the Bunnymen a run for their money as the most amazing return-to-form-twenty-plus-years-into-their-career that I can think of.

John Hunter, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand any hate for "Jetstream" as it's like any of their souled-out tracks.

Which tracks by New Order does it remind you of out of curiosity?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

Sub-Culture remix, World (The Price of Love).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

I think alot of these new tracks are reminiscent of Republic (in a good way)

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)

Scenestars, which is perhaps the most bloated self-important example of an mp3 blog anywhere, has posted THREE album tracks ( http://scenestars.net/2005/02/new-order-krafty.php ) from Waiting For The Sirens Call.

The Rub also noticed this.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

Parts of the chorus of "Guilt is a Useless Emotion" (aka "Fast Synth") sound like Very era Pet Shop Boys.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

James! I am The Rub!

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)

Doh!

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

the pissing contest in the comments on that rub posting was an interesting glimpse into the world of mp3blogging.

as people keep implying that the new stuff is good I am looking fwd to hearing this new stuff. good.

gspm (gspm), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

Could someone gmail me this too please?

nothingelseon@gmail.com

Bill E (bill_e), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)

got to say that the initial comparisons to Technique are unfounded. While the songs are stronger than on Get Ready, I was hoping for something more, um, disco i guess. It's good, but it ain't Technique.

heywood jablomi (heywood), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

Wow. Bloated and self-important? Self-indulgent, yes, but until I start posting reviews of my own records, I hardly think my prurient interest in New Order is self-important. Exactly the opposite.

I'm a musician and I write about music I love. I don't get paid to write for Scenestars. I do it when I hear something I want everyone to hear. When you start paying me to do it, then you get to call me bloated and self-important. We're not Pitchfork, we don't just do everything the way we're told to do it. Until then I'm just a music geek. Try to remember we're all on the same side, and if we're not then what the hell is all this for?

I really like the new record, and the positive response has far outweighed the negative. I look forward to seeing a huge resurgent interest in New Order as a result of this CD.

EJ Friedman, Thursday, 10 February 2005 00:20 (twenty years ago)

Technique's songs which aren't synth dominated outnumber those that are. Look:

Fine Time + Round and Round + Mr Disco + Vanishing Point = 4

All the Way + Love Less + Guilty Partner + Run + Dream Attack = 5

so to say the new album isn't like Technique coz its not synthy is a spurious point, no?

I think Technique was regarded as The New Order Ibiza Album coz the 2 singles were influenced by the scene, part of the album (a very small part) was recorded there and coz that was the dominating dance music craze at that time. It certainly doesn't come across that way if you listen to it in its entirety.

Waiting for the Sirens Call is actually I think a better song than most of thw songs on Technique. It's that good. It is far better than Krafty, which should NEVER have been the first single. And you know what? I think one of the things that made WFRSC the song good is that New Order produced it thmeselves. They shouldn't have got the producers in coz they produce better music when they produce themselves, every album twixt Power Corruption and Lies and Technique inclusive being proof. The only producers that have done the band justice are Arthur Baker (definitely, and probably coz he's so good he can't mess anyone's music up) and POSSIBLY Stephen Hague. I say possibly, coz he appeared to do a good job on Regret. I have often wondered whether True Faith might have actually sounded better without his influence - it's a great song, but it may have been even better without him! I wish for what will never happen (that's almost a Barney lyric!) ie, that the band would rerecord Republic, produce it all themselves and see if songs like Special and Spooky sound classic as a result, with Hooky's bass occupying the prominent place it so deserves.

(I have a funny feeling that dan will disagree with everything I just said)

MarkH (MarkH), Thursday, 10 February 2005 00:38 (twenty years ago)

It is far better than Krafty, which should NEVER have been the first single.

Wow, I would have to strongly disagree -- there are many excellent songs on the album, but "Krafty" finds that space which other lead singles like "Fine Time," "Regret" and "Crystal" have, just working as a standalone pop song that recharges you and makes you think, "All right, bring on the album!" Now Republic lets down the side a bit there, I agree. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)

I agree that it's not the best track on the record, but there's a wealth of potential singles really. It's ok for a lead off track. The title track is my favorite too.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)

That was the last one I heard, the title track, due to the way I heard the tracks -- and when I did I was *really* impressed. It makes me think of their Can/motorik fascination of many years ago finding a new outlet without repeating old ground.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:33 (twenty years ago)

Can/motorik fascination

Only really at the beginning though, the rest is like a full on happy "Love Vigilantes" crossed with "Regret".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)

True, only at the start, but enough to lead the way, if you will -- if it wasn't there, I don't think the song would be quite as striking as it is, though it would still be excellent. But this is also an example of how well New Order -- and Joy Division! -- started songs in general. The list of flat-out-astonishing opening ten seconds of a song examples they've provided over the moons is, now that I think about, huge!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)

Turn is pretty amazing, although for some reason I think that liking it makes me somewhat sappy and old. . . . right now that's the only song that's really grabbing me, but I'm definitely liking this more than Get Ready.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

tee hee

http://www.neworderonline.com/Gallery/WaitingForTheSirensCallFront4News.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

Saville strikes again!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

Looks like Saville went ON strike when he did that. Is that really the cover? Is it wrong for me to want a nice picture again?

I think Technique has the best cover of the albums (LowLife transparency version a runner up).

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

I love it.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

jeez, i was really looking forward to sth in the vein of the Krafty cover...

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

Looks like Saville went ON strike when he did that.

Because everyone knows he hates minimal design. Oh wait.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

I like the design, but not the colour scheme. Orange writing on white background? I'll pass.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

Relax. It's can't possibly be the real cover.

Neil FC (Neil FC), Thursday, 10 February 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

tee hee.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I'm not 100% certain - this is according to warnermusic.de. However, before you dismiss it, let me remind you of another classic New Order cover:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000002LCK.01.LZZZZZZZ.gif

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)

The Substance cover is kinda boring. The WFTSC cover just looks bad.

Neil FC (Neil FC), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

and his heart was going like mad and no i said no i won't no

i like the cover.

Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

haha, I turned the booklets inside out on the Substance cover because I liked the graphics more!

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)

I always liked the Substance cover because it looked literary... like there was a WWII-era novel stashed on your lp shelf.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 10 February 2005 19:27 (twenty years ago)

good GOD. is that really the cover?

because it is fucking brilliant.

it works on about ten different levels, that.

mind you, i'm quite drunk.

still. wonderful. and the mixed-case thing works this time. so there.

god. i love that. i sincerely hope it isn't a piss-take.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

You just love it cause they've reinstated the apostrophe.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

It's all about the apostrophe.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)

bigger!

http://images.warner.de/images-artists/WEA/New_Order/573964/1027670.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

Oh. No.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

I suspect the title and name will only be on a transparent sticker - gotta preserve that mysterious image.

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

It's like a rave-flavored entry in the periodic table.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

yes: OTM with the periodic-table thing. so: we've got chemicals, negativity, positivity (the colour) and simplicity ... i mean the cover is new order.

god, i'm drunker than i thought to come up with that ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

If we all had to wear colors which indicated our occupation (like in the original Star Trek series), then designers would definitely wear white with orange.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

x-post to alba: and yes, i've never been so delighted to see an apostrophe in my life ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 10 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

I love it. But, then, I'm terribly gay for almost everything Peter Saville does.

coco, Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:30 (twenty years ago)

You can love him in a straight way, sir.

Yeah, looks even better in the larger version. Great stuff. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:34 (twenty years ago)

Looks great as a background image on your desktop, I've just discovered.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)

not bad at all ... although I'm using one of Saville's waste paintings at the moment

coco, Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

I'm loving this album so much more than the best stuff on "Get Ready," whose title seems especially apt given what's come after it. It's a great disc to blast in the car, and even my baby seems to like it. I even like the crap lyrics, but what would a New Order album be without dodgy couplets?

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 10 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)

I love me those 'crap' lyrics, really.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)

I love them, too, for being so proudly crap.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)

Crap lyrics? When has Bernard written better lyrics? IMHO, the lyrics on WFTSC are the best he's ever written.

biznotic, Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

That's an overstatement, but I like them just fine.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 10 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

"Real love can't be bought / it is wild and can't be caught / real love can't be sold / it's another color than gold." Again, I don't mind them one bit, but these lyrics are terrible. And there are plenty more where these come from, which is one reason Barny is such a special guy.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)

"krafty" is quite an interesting lyric. anyone else thought that the chorus is meant to be from the POV of some kind of creator/god?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

xpost
I kinda like that one.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

It's the "it's another color than gold" part that makes me cringe. That's the kind of awkward metered/rhymed stuff grade schoolers come up with when they're first writing poetry. But New Order's always had a wonderfully naive - yet thankfully not twee - streak in them.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)

Haha, that's the part I like, because it's an unexpected turn at the end of something so banal and cliched.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 11 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)

No, that isn't really really the cover is it? Christ almighty god. It's brilliant. Is someone joking? Is someone playing a joke? Spencer, who put you up to it?

I don't know what's happening to me. I've entered a twighlight zone. I just wrote this essay about this album. And...is that the cover? Be Jesus. I mean, bejesus. You know I just don't understand why the whole world doesn't come to a standstill about this album. Who are these people who don't care about it? My interest in people who don't care about this album is moving away from me at an exponentially decreasing rate, I fear.

All I want to understand is, having heard this album, WHY WHY would anyone listen to anything else at all? For what possible reason?

IT is
U N R E A L

UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL
UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL
UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL
UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL UNREAL

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

"i hope john denver doesn't stop one of the singles like he did with run".it sounds like "leaving on a jet plane"

La Camilla Henemark, Friday, 11 February 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)

xpost

People can continue to compare it to what came before if they like,
I’ll continue to see it as a singular statement wholly unconnected
to anything before in their career. They haven’t done reggae before
have they? Only the cover of Keith Hudson’s “Turn The Heater On”
that appeared on the Peel Sessions. When else have they done reggae?
Am I just not remembering? Clue me in here. When on
Republic exactly did they tackle a reggae beat?
When on Get
Ready for that matter?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

Also, since people have already complimented the fabulous job Bernard did on the lyrics, might I just add that vocally I think he did a fabulous job as well?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 07:19 (twenty years ago)

When else have they done reggae?

er, just for the sake of historical accuracy: they did that cover of "vietnam", bimble, a couple of years ago. it was for charidee. i quite liked it, but i think that put me in a minority of one.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:40 (twenty years ago)

But it was a cover!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

bimble's otm about barneys voice. it might be part studio wizardry, but its fantastic.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

x-post: so was turn the heater on! and you mentioned that first. so ner ;)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

The title track has me on the verge of tears every time. I don't think there's any studio trickery going on with Barney's voice - it's not like he's suddenly soudning like Pavoratti or something. Just the same winsome-can-sort-of-sing-but-in-the-most-affecting-way-ever Bernard.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)

The reggae-ish one is a bit Ace of Base "All That She Wants"!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:35 (twenty years ago)

x-post: so was turn the heater on! and you mentioned that first. so ner ;)

hahaha. You're funny, grimly. Yes, I know. But it was all central to my point. Sometimes I just get a little excited about this stuff. I want the whole world to hear it and be as happy about it as I am.

The title track has me on the verge of tears every time

Ha! Only the the title track? On the verge? I can sit and have tears streaming down my face most of the whole damn album.

I've been upset to find that neworderonline has been down for at least the last 24 hours or so. Anyone know what's up with that?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:13 (twenty years ago)

neworderonline has been up all day. it was down yesterday. there's a thread explaining the problem. he's implemented some changes to help speed up the site but there have been extreme numbers of visitors to the site since the album leaked/news of krafty single came out.

the "reggae" influence circa Republic must be the dreadful Sly and Robbie mixes of Ruined In A Day.

Turn the Heater On is one of newOrder's best songs and although i hated Vietnam when i first heard it, repeated listens rewarded me with one of my favorite windows-down-summerlovin tunes.

How f__king good is WFTSC? It's almost a perfect album. Better than we could have ever hoped for and they've got 7 more ready for the next LP. Bring on the Riton mixes of Krafty!

biznotic, Saturday, 12 February 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)

while some of y'all are trying to out-emo each other on this, i'm finding that with repeated listening this album becomes both better and worse than i had initially thought. definitely digging the first half of the record at the moment, but completely cringing at the bottom quarter, especially 'guilt' which strikes me as bog-standard pop-dance of the likes you might find alongside Kristine W and Amber on some dodgy compilation. a friend put it succinctly when he said that the verses start a little off but as soon as those choruses kick in you know it's a decent NO tune. that said i really don't think the majority of this album stands up with much of their back catalogue, let alone Technique. i really can't figure out what some of you folks are so hyped over.

heywood jablomi (heywood), Saturday, 12 February 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

Sucks for you dude.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:55 (twenty years ago)

Spencer wins. Now, let us consider which of these tracks will sound the best live.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:03 (twenty years ago)

Surely "Krafty" will be the new set opener, like "Regret" and "Crystal" were before it?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)

:-) A fine thing if so. If at the right time of day in Coachella it could be flat out stunning.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

Are you going to Coachella, Ned? You left the impression you weren't going.

out-emo each other on this

Excuse me? I DO hope you aren't referring to me, as I abhor the word "emo" to begin with and therefore, never ever waste my time trying to "out-emo" anyone for any reason whatsoever.

And I am so so so so so tired of people pining away for another Technique. I do not understand. Movement is probably my favourite album of all time but I'm not sat here thinking they're gonna do another one of those or another Power Corruption & Lies or another Lowlife for that matter. Technique was released over a decade ago. This is 2005, get OVER it already.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:23 (twenty years ago)

Movement is your favorite album of all time? Hmm...bit short on solid songs I think.

Patrick South (Patrick South), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:18 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, well, when I first bought it I couldn't tell one song from another. Go figure!

get OVER it already.

GET over it al READY.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)

There's only one band in the world capable of doing a song as brilliant as "Turn" and that's New Order.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

relax.

"The title track has me on the verge of tears every time

Ha! Only the the title track? On the verge? I can sit and have tears streaming down my face most of the whole damn album."

"I abhor the word "emo" to begin with and therefore, never ever waste my time trying to "out-emo" anyone for any reason whatsoever."

i mean c'mon! tears?!

it's not that i can't imagine anyone liking this album, i just can't imagine anyone being moved to tears over it.

heywood jablomi (heywood), Sunday, 13 February 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)

Yes, and TOO BAD FOR YOU.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 13 February 2005 08:39 (twenty years ago)

i still think you're all mad, but i'm warming up to the single. just got the full album, let's give it a spin.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Sunday, 13 February 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)

Sigh….. I shared Dr. C’s wish for them to experiment a bit more but one listen in and it’s clear they haven’t. Too many tracks sound like they’re on autopilot. Too many verse-chorus-verse songs and not enought f**king about. Dull.

stevo (stevo), Sunday, 13 February 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

jesus, what's with the agression?

heywood jablomi (heywood), Monday, 14 February 2005 03:35 (twenty years ago)

There is a better quality rip that's started showing up on slsk.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

Does it reveal lots of wonderful synths that were hidden in the other mix?

Patrick South (Patrick South), Monday, 14 February 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)

The textures are definitely clearer and the 'watery-ness' of the previous rip is gone. Sounds like you should probably wait for the remixes.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

Actually, yes, the synths are slightly more apparent...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)

Sigh….. I shared Dr. C’s wish for them to experiment a bit more but one listen in and it’s clear they haven’t. Too many tracks sound like they’re on autopilot. Too many verse-chorus-verse songs and not enought f**king about. Dull.

-- stevo (stefanroo...), February 13th, 2005.

you want 50 yr old men to still be experimental? that's the problem with those who don't like WFTSC; they expect newOrder to still be a "groudbreaking" or "experimental" band but they're just 50 yr old dudes who've already made their mark. now all that's left is having fun and writing music. nothing more, nothing less. enjoy it for what it is but don't expect for them to ever be creative they way they were from 82-85, it just ain't gonna happen.

biznotic, Monday, 14 February 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

how sad.

heywood jablomi (heywood), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

I'm wondering what would constitute "experimental" in this case. Perfectly formed melancholy pop songs have always been at the core of New Order's best work - whether it's delivered via sequencer or pick-up, man or machine. I'm assuming some people were expecting more 'synthesizers' - I can't imagine anything less "experimental" at this point in time - and they've never been IDM - they've just always been the perfect mix of pop, rock and dance. I think you people should go listen to Autechre or something. I'm just glad they're writing pretty songs again.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

xpost

I think people can be experimental at any age. Would I have liked it more had they gone all crazy and weird on us? Maybe, maybe not. I still think what they have delivered here is more than enough, and I do think they have broken some new ground as far as their own career goes, even if they haven't re-written the entire rulebook of making music in the 21st century. It is a shame if people don't like it, but then I couldn't fathom the hate for Get Ready either.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 14 February 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Ah, I found something that came to mind when the talk of Bernard lyrics cropped up -- it's from a Melody Maker humor piece in 1993 when "Regret" came out, and supposedly features the band's conversation the beach in LA (where, indeed, they were filming a TV appearance):

(BERNARD has written some lyrics...)

HOOKY: What's the song? 'Regret'? We wrote the music for that two chuffin' years ago! 'Ere. (snatches the piece of paper)

A single grain of sand in the desert
A single leaf in the jungle
A single tear upon your cheek
Love's right daft, I reckon

What the f*** does that mean?

BERNARD: It's just...words.

HOOKY: Oh well, that's all right then! (screws up bit of paper and tosses it over his shoulder) Bollocks!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

It's amazing how much better people's work gets when they get off the sauce, but i'm sure that the various sauces poured in over the years attributed greatly to the rapid aging of barney and hooky. Not to bust anyone out but every song on the last two albums, just about, has been about them twelve steps.

jetstream lover, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 06:34 (twenty years ago)

okay, i've had a chance to listen to the whole album a number of times. while washing the car!

three albums in a row now they've stuck the most terrific song at the very beginning of the record. regret, crystal and now who's joe? with the chiming guitars so effortless and uplifting, like the end of a really good movie. it should have been the single, not krafty. although i've warmed to krafty as well. and "i told you so" is groovy and has the kind of lyric that tickles me.

i lose interest about halfway through, but i've never liked an entire new order album so that's not a problem. so, good stuff overall. four great tracks, which puts it by my reckoning on par with low-life and well above get ready!

oh, and "working overtime" is just dumb.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)

(x-post) Spencer, what I was thinking of as experimental wasn't linked to any particular use of instruments i.e I'm not looking for 'more electronic' or 'more guitar', just hoping for something *unexpected* like they used to do back in their heyday. It is probably expecting too much for them to rip up the way that they have worked since Technique days, but I'd just liked to be knocked sideways like I was with Movement, EGG, Temptation, Blue Monday... Of course these were recorded years ago and maybe I'm trying to stick with an idea of New Order which is long out of date. (And Gill has gone now.)We know they can do wonderful, moving, skyscraping pop and there's nothing wrong with another album of this, but I suppose it's a measure of how highly I rate them that I KNOW they have more in them than this.

But it's moot now, we have what we have and I will almost certainly enjoy it. I have not heard it yet - I am waiting for release date.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

You haven't heard it??? I think you will enjoy it very much!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

hey, i haven't heard it either. i'm containing myself, but only just.

i hate leaked albums, though. they're all encoded at 0.1kbps and have the wrong songs on them.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

I used to think that, but now it's almost like I get to enjoy a new album twice!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

no ... must ... resist ... must ... aaargh ...

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

(x-post) Spencer, what I was thinking of as experimental wasn't linked to any particular use of instruments i.e I'm not looking for 'more electronic' or 'more guitar', just hoping for something *unexpected* like they used to do back in their heyday. It is probably expecting too much for them to rip up the way that they have worked since Technique days, but I'd just liked to be knocked sideways like I was with Movement, EGG, Temptation, Blue Monday... Of course these were recorded years ago and maybe I'm trying to stick with an idea of New Order which is long out of date. (And Gill has gone now.)We know they can do wonderful, moving, skyscraping pop and there's nothing wrong with another album of this, but I suppose it's a measure of how highly I rate them that I KNOW they have more in them than this.
But it's moot now, we have what we have and I will almost certainly enjoy it. I have not heard it yet - I am waiting for release date.

-- Dr. C (petethane...), February 15th, 2005.

Classic! Complaining before you've even heard it!

leftfield@comeback2005.com, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

I want to check out the krafty video but I can only find it in real video format. Any sites out there have wma friendly versions?

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

Video is up (for Realplayer) at neworderonline.com (requires free registration). It's quite sexy.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

It's almost NSFW (PG-13)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

**You haven't heard it??? I think you will enjoy it very much!**

Well I had an unmastered CD of the album a month ago, but left it at a friend's house. He's lost it!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 10:07 (twenty years ago)

Only the second and last songs are really not so good right? And even that second one is okay if you're a cheesy Moz-lover.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 10:46 (twenty years ago)

Check the thread at NOOL titled KRAFTY VIDEO DEBUT MONDAY or something similar. on page 3 or 4 you will find a direct link to the 27MB WMV file.

biznotic, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

mms://213.132.96.108/Archive/01MG013000_1000.wmv

JoB (JoB), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

How do I save that?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

I've no idea but I was able to watch it.

JoB (JoB), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)

for those who haven't heard it yet. kingblind has an mp3 download link to the complete album. hurry up i bet that link won't work forever. i quite like the album by the way. about as much as i liked get ready. i mean for a band who has been going for 25 years they still shine...

the whole thing is less melancholic than usual. screamadelish in places (eg morning, night and day, esp barney's voice in the beginning sounds a little like gillespie's). and very varied. great stuff. it runs a little out of steam in the second half but the first three songs are quite possibly the strongest beginning of any no album ever.

krafty is the dullest song after the totally forgettable jetstream. really crappy electronic effects. quite classy to release it as the first single.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 18 February 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

I think you are right about those first three songs. They sit very well next to each other. I couldn't really say I liked one more than the other two. Not that there's anything wrong with Krafty etc., but for some reason those three just make a real nice opening trio, as you say.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)

Bernard and Stephen speak at length on Radio 1's 'One World' program:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/urban/tracklistings/one_world/one_world_tracklistings_live.shtml
should be up til Feb 21.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

gah. of course that kingbling link works when i see this post at work, but is down before i get home. ah well.. back to the patient waiting.

jonviachicago, Saturday, 19 February 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)

ok, i got my promo copy the other day. i've only had a chance to listen to it once so far.

it's better than "get ready". but, er ... well, so far "krafty" is the best thing on it by a country mile.

that said, i have been known to change my mind about new order albums. i'll need to give it a few more goes before i make my mind up. but so far i hear an awful lot of sub-david-potts guitar licks, some very bland synthesisers, and little in the way of hewn-from-stone hairs-on-the-back-of-the-neck new order melodic and harmonic genius.

hmph.

o: i also really like "working overtime". new order do the fall, yo.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

just been listening to it some more in the car. not sure about the first song, but it's not bad. i'm getting to like the second one and love the third one (the title track). the reggae one is growing on me too. "morning night and day" and "dracula's castle" still strike me as lazy will-this-do efforts. and, er, that's as far as i got on that listen.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

the first and second songs bother me because they sound like two different takes of basically the same song. plus, the second song starts with a riff that sounds like it fell off the back of the Gin Blossoms' tour bus, and i can't stop myself wanting to sing, "but I don't want to take advice from fools...I'll keep thinking everything is cool" over it. XD

jury is still out for me on this album, truthfully. there are some bright spots, but i'm not feeling its overall strength.

janni (janni), Thursday, 24 February 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Can someone gmail me Krafty and Track 1? My computer ate them.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

Unlike most New Order albums, this one is listenable straight through (although I usually turn off 'that last one'). There are some tracks that aren't deeply inspiring, but the highlights really are incredible.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)

On Neworderonline.com they're all going mad for 'Turn'. (But they're all cockfarmers on there...)Any thoughts on this track, people?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 24 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

Can someone gmail me Krafty and Track 1? My computer ate them.

TSK.

"Turn"? Great song! I'll let Spencer say more.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 24 February 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

haven't been on NOOL in ages. and how does one go about farming cocks, anyway?

"Turn" is okay. not brilliant. nothing else on the album bothers me more than the way the first two songs play together. come to think of it, i'd say even the first three songs are the weakest of them, for me.

janni (janni), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

"Turn" I think is my second favorite after the title track.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

Ned can you get me Krafty again? Please!

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

On Neworderonline.com they're all going mad for 'Turn'. (But they're all cockfarmers on there...)Any thoughts on this track, people?

i thought alext and i were the only people who ever said "cockfarmer"! mind you, i now have this vague memory of alex wandering off at all tomorrow's parties in 2001 to meet "the bloke who invented the word 'cockfarmer'" ... ah, the wonders of etymology and linguistic spread.

anyway, "turn". just listening to it now. it's ok, isn't it? i'm not a huge fan of that strummety-strum twangety-twang stuff at the beginning: it's just not very new order, izzit? and the chorus is sub-britpop yawnsomeness, really.

but it gets going after the two-minute mark (after the ridiculous nineties organ bits). that's some nice scratchy guitar, and the treble melody that comes in about 2'45" is just sweeeeeet.

i'm not a fan of the synthy middle eight bit. it's just dull.

i dunno. it's a very, very average new order song. this whole album seems to be full of very, very average new order songs ... there are some exceptions to that, i think, but on the whole it ain't setting the heather on fire.

still, it's kicking "get ready's" ass repeatedly.

and "working overtime" is fucking brilliant. it doesn't belong on the album, but it has a place in my heart. -uh!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

I completely disagree with your review. Also there's plenty of twang in New Order's catalog. "Sub-britpop yawnsomeness"? No.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

no? yes.

(repeat until fade)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:20 (twenty years ago)

"Turn"'s greatness unexpectedly hit me like a ton of bricks this past weekend.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 24 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)

I keep telling myself I will relisten to the album to form an opinion and I did it once, but I can't seem to formulate one yet. However, I think if I were going to chime in on the new album, definitely better than Get Ready and there are some fun moments, but underwhelmed so far. I'll try listening again.

jae (jazzler), Friday, 25 February 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)

grimly, i don't even know you, but i haven't heard an opinion on the album more OTM (now meaning OFF THE MARK) than yours. Krafty and Working Overtime as the best cuts? Turn as yawnsome Britpop? Whatever. You'll regret those remarks when the album hits you. what the fuck do you people want? joy division are dead, newOrder haven't been "dancey" or "edgy" in nearly 16 years and WFTSC is miles better than anything they've done since Technique. It will rival Technique in many peoples ILM lists 10 years from now. New Order have change, it's time you changed your perception of the band and either accept the NEW order or move on and forget about them. They will never produce anything resembling Temptation or even Vanishing Point again. They're now a Rock band with synth-pop tendencies. as you may have guessed, i love the new album. I liked Technique on first listen but it took almost 6 years for me to realize that i truly loved the album straight through. I have worn out WFTSC for the last few weeks and it's easily their 3rd best album...maybe. Battling PC&L right now in my mind but i can't even listen to PC&L straight through. It's the most complete album they've ever done. I wish it had more programmed drumming and some more synths, but i appreciate it for what it is. You should approach the album in a new way, rather than holding it up to their mid-80's classic sound.

Did anyone read the article where Steve Morris had to stop everyone in the studio to say "We've already done that song...it's on Low-Life!". They've moved on, they're happy writing songs together and that energy shines through in their music. Now listen again and again until your opinion matches mine exactly. Thank you.

biznotic, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)

it's not as good as republic.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

there's not enough of Hooky on Republic. it's not a newOrder record with the exception of Regret. it's the first Other Two album with vocals by Bernard Sumner. end of discussion.

biznotic, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:32 (twenty years ago)

it's still not as good as republic.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)

"Turn" is just plain bloody brilliant, and if that makes me a cockfarmer, well that's just too bad. Who knows, maybe there's money to be made in farming cocks anyway?

I've long wanted to say "Turn" is the best track on the album, but upon repeated plays, I've really been surprised how much that reggae-ish track "I Told You So" has jumped out at me. I'm not sure it's the best track on the album, either, but it's probably the most interesting, and certainly a landmark in their career. They tried something a little different there and though it starts out one way, it ends in another (does anyone remember how Bernard commented that somehow it ended up Velvet Underground after awhile?). Just something wonderfully creatively wild going on there. I hear more things in it each time I play it. For those of you who didn't catch the BBC thing, Morris was real proud of it cause he said it was based around his drum beat. I thought it was funny when Bernard wanted to call it "jazz fusion" and Morris said "eh...not jazz...more like reggae-rock fusion".

Republic is WEAK. Regret is the only track I can ever even remember off that album. Definitely the weakest New Order album. I bought it twice and sold it twice! Just nothing there.

new order do the fall, yo.

Now, didn't I say exactly that way upthread? (except I didn't say 'yo' ha ha) ;)

i'm not a huge fan of that strummety-strum twangety-twang stuff at the beginning: it's just not very new order, izzit?

Neither is Working Overtime "very new order". You're not getting anywhere with me using that argument! And if you work as hard as I do as often as I do, you can bet it's good to finally come home and hear New Order do a ballsy Fallish Strokesian thing about working overtime like that!

New Order have change, it's time you changed your perception of the band and either accept the NEW order or move on and forget about them.

This really is the very crux of the matter. But it's a realization I've only come to recently. I've decided it shouldn't surprise me that I'm not on the same page with people who were nuts about Technique, Republic & Brotherhood. Get Ready was the first time I'd been seriously interested in their output in years and years. This is a whole new ballgame, folks. Like it or don't, but don't waste your time hoping for another Technique or whatever. They are just not the same band. In fact, I was playing the album tonight and got to the end of the title track (#3) to that point where he starts singing "How many times must I lose my way..." and it occured to me very starkly that they had changed as a band. Because the amazing thing about that line is that the melody changes once again in this song where it's perfectly structured, and yet they switch gears and do it to you AGAIN, just that one more time even though you weren't expecting it. And the old New Order never would have done that. And that's why this album just pisses all over Get Ready.

And I'm not going to say it's a perfect album either. Upon repeated plays I will allow "Dracula's Castle" has begun to seem a bit boring. I've actually come to appreciate the dreaded "Jetstream" a bit more than that one, now, even if I do hope they don't do another song like "Jetstream" again.

So you know, in the end, maybe it ISN'T the best
album ever made in humankind, food of the gods, etc. But I still
think it's just an all around enjoyable, fabulous thing and I'm sorry that people can't see that on the same kind of immediate level that it sounds to me. There are moments of sheer brilliance here. Open your ears to them.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:46 (twenty years ago)

So what I was originally going to suggest that night about a week ago when ILM was down or I couldn't get on, was that "I Told You So" should be one of their singles. They should release it as a single. I mean if you are going to do an EXTENDED version of something...you know, a good old fashioned 12" or something...there's real potential here.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)

"turn" has got something very mature about it. it never really gets going. an understated guitar pop gem.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 25 February 2005 06:11 (twenty years ago)

One of the lyrics to "Working Overtime" is:

"where did it all go wrong/house music all night long"

This CD is teaching me what it means to use the repeat button on my CD player. I plan to be here for at least the next 6 hours with this album on repeat. This is probably my 5th play in. Let's see how many I can rack up. Should I start counting?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)

don't listen to the cd on repeat, bimble. you are going to kill it. it's too good for such a destiny. what were all you people upthread on "republic" on about? that was a pretty forgettable album. i have the feeling the new one is on par with "technique".

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 25 February 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)

That is a strange feeling indeed.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 25 February 2005 10:33 (twenty years ago)

WTF, is "Republic" the new "Get Ready" all of a sudden?

Two-thirds of "Republic" was great. The first two-thirds, more or less. It was nice of them to sequence the album so conveniently with all the best stuff at the start.

If you held me at gunpoint and forced me to choose, I would have to rank "Get Ready" above "WFTSC". It's close, though.

This may be the moment when the "Get Ready" posse abandons me for good.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 25 February 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)

I like the new album when i'm listening to it, but i haven't really been tempted to get into it again. Maybe I just hate hold people.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 25 February 2005 11:24 (twenty years ago)

anyway, "turn". just listening to it now. it's ok, isn't it? i'm not a huge fan of that strummety-strum twangety-twang stuff at the beginning: it's just not very new order, izzit?

Eh? I think the intro to Turn is the only thing that explains so many of the WFTSC/Technique comparisons. It's sounds very much like the intro to Dream Attack.

It's my favourite on the album too. And the fact it's near the end means I keep failing to give the middle of the record a fair chance - once I'm past Krafty, I usually can't resist skipping forward to Guilt... and Turn. In this sense (as well as in a few others, actually), this album is reminding me more and more of Electronic's Twisted Tenderness. That's a good thing in my book, by the way.

JimD (JimD), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)

I'd like to correct myself: it was actually Working Overtime that was based on Morris' drum beat, not I Told You So.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

there's fairly little written on here that is making much sense, surely.

'Waiting For The Sirens Call' is a pretty strong collection of songs and bare in mind that Lowlife and Brotherhood were around 20 years ago; guess we're surrounded by too much fashionista nonsense sometimes.

nick towers, Saturday, 26 February 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)

Listening to the album again for the first time in a couple of weeks and...still fucking brilliant. Current album of the year for me, I think, and while certainly it's due to longstanding affection, it's also because the band knows how to seemingly effortlessly push my buttons. Still ten months to go, though. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 February 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

don't listen to the cd on repeat, bimble. you are going to kill it. it's too good for such a destiny.

I honestly appreciate this sentiment, and I've given it some careful thought, but the problem is, it's kindof like saying "stop masterbating because you'll go blind".

I went out to a pub tonight to meet up with a good friend who is moving to Sweden soon with his Swedish wife. They had already played 2 New Order songs in that pub prior to his showing up there with a few other friends of mine. And then soon after he showed up, and they were getting beers, I said "Did you know New Order are DJing in Sweden on March 1st?" And then right as soon as I said that, even though New Order weren't playing at the time, ANOTHER NEW ORDER SONG came on. I knew then it was going to be a great night. Well this was an "Seattle's only English pub" so I guess that helps. But Christ. They must have played about 8 New Order songs over the course of the evening. Clouds enveloped me, I was in some kind of heaven, etc.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 27 February 2005 07:41 (twenty years ago)

I love 'Turn' for its hearttugging chorus, but what do those guitar twangs that come in at 0:20 remind me of? It's bugging me.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 14:00 (twenty years ago)

(maybe I don't mean the chorus as such. It's the bit just before, that has lines like "sitting here alone at night, my / sleepless eyes are open wide". The phrasing is so gorgeous)

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

Alba, the guitar reminds you or Chris Isaac. It's ok. You can rest now. Turn is a brilliant song. Lotta love for this whole album...yes indeed.

Bimble...What pub were you at? Not Fado, surely. Was it the George and something in Fremont?

biznotic, Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

I thought of Chris Isaak, but no! I don't think it is that.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

Never mind, anyway.

Favourite moment is Barney's voice on "road is long". Yep.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

And yeah, having listened to the whole thing properly now, I'm kind of surprised people would choose 'Jetstream' to pick on. You could perhaps argue that it sticks out a bit, but I like that. But to say it's bad, well I dunno where that's coming from when there's tired old shit like 'Morning Night And Day' and 'Hey Now What You Doing' really do drag the album down.

I'm undecided about 'Guilt Is A Useless Emotion'. The vocal line/lyrics really spoil its potential, I think. Actually yeah, it's not the lyrics themselves. I can love a line like "But out there the world
is a beautiful place / with mountains, lakes and the human race" when it's delivered the way it is on 'Krafty'. But all those flabby words on GIAUE just grate. I think I'd prefer a remix with just the "I want your love / I need your love" bits.

'I Told You So' is fucking brilliant though. Beats-wise it just puts everything else on the album, 'Krafty' aside, to shame.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

Haha, I love the vocal parts on "Guilt..." that you hate!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

HA HA HA HA

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)

Was it the George and something in Fremont?

George & Dragon, yes. Fado is an Irish pub, but I'm thinking you knew that. It is pretty interesting how many more Irish pubs we have than English ones, isn't it? Although my roomate who is British said there is another English one out on one of the islands...can't remember which.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 27 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

i'm coming round to this album. i really am. it was the title track that did it. sitting at gatwick yesterday on the way back from ATP, it took hold in my brain. it's wonderful.

more later. i think part of my brain is still in a chalet at camber sands.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

So I'm finally listening to this album and as a non-NO fan, let me say this: holy mother of Christ. Dunno if this'll still be my favorite album of the year after I've had it for six months, but I am gleefully anticipating wearing it into the ground. The title track/"Krafty" combo is by FARRRRRRR the best one-two punch I've heard on an album this year. Was it just me or were they bringing in the "Atmosphere" synths on the title track?

I bet they rule the UNIVERSE at Coachella. I'm actually a little pissed that they're playing there instead of putting an LA date on their stadium tour.

James.Cobo (jamescobo), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)

you do know they're playing Oakland the Friday before Coachella with the Chemical Brothers, right? I'm doing both shows!

biz, Wednesday, 2 March 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)

i got a copy of the final mastered copy of the album. it's quite different. jetstream has been stripped of ana matronic completely. overall sound quality is greatly improved. vocals sound like they were rerecorded on sevaral tracks.

biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

yikes, that's a bunch of copies!

biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

sevaral! the hits keep coming

biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)

cut n paste from neworderonline:

The US edition of Waiting The Sirens' Call will have one exclusive extra track.

Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Mac Quayle Vocal Mix)

This is also what I received tonight, some release dates:

3/8/05 Digital Release

Krafty (Radio Edit)

Krafty (Album version)

3/22/05 Digital Exclusives

Itunes

Krafty (The Glimmers 12" Extended)

Krafty (The Glimmers Dub Version)

Yahoo Music

Krafty (Phones Reality Remix)

Napster

Krafty (Bernard's Re-edit)

Real/Rhapsody

Krafty (Riton Re-Dub Remix)


3/29/05 Digital Release

Waiting For The Sirens' Call UK version

4/26/05 CD Release

Waiting For The Sirens' Call US version
*Includes bonus track Guilt Is A Useless Emotion (Mac Quayle Vocal Mix)

biznotic, Friday, 4 March 2005 06:26 (twenty years ago)

as a non-NO fan, let me say this: holy mother of Christ.

-- James.Cobo (trdn8...), March 1st, 2005.

I'd like to have this quote engraved in a plaque sometime, I think.
______________________________
jetstream has been stripped of ana matronic completely. overall sound quality is greatly improved. vocals sound like they were rerecorded on sevaral tracks.

Oh god you tantalizing liar! Look, look I really need to know the answer to this question: I have thought for quite some time in my gut that they are going to get rid of the piano ending to Dracula's Castle on the album. Honestly I would rather they didn't, but if they do, I can deal. I just need to know: is it gone? I have to know that now, and the rest of the surprises can wait until later.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:11 (twenty years ago)

jetstream has been stripped of ana matronic completely.

WTF, this will ruin it. Along with "Someone Like You" and "World" (I believe I made this comparison upthread), "Jetstream" is this album's slightly more dancepop-y than usual "destined to be a single" track. Would you want to hear "World" with just Barney singing on it?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:31 (twenty years ago)

Hmmm...maybe they'll save the Ana version for single release?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:33 (twenty years ago)

WTF, this will ruin it.

Hey, don't go down the road to ruin...

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:36 (twenty years ago)

Of COURSE I hope they purge it of her vocals? Who do you think I am?

MR. POTATO HEAD?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 07:37 (twenty years ago)

Not only is the title track one of the best things the band has ever done, but is this the first time a New Order album has ever actually had a title track?

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

What, you didn't like that obscure rarity "The Rest Of"?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

It's not my fave, ranked well below that flexidisc version of "BBC Radio 1 Live in Concert."

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)

a song called "the best of new order" ... hang on, it'd sound a bit like "regret", wouldn't it?

:)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

Also, the start of "Morning Night and Day" sounds like "Material Girl." I always wondered what would have happened had New Order hooked upwith Nile Rogers, beforehe morphed into Don Was ...

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

they would have become gods. gods, i tell you.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

'Regret' is only OK really, apart from the first line. The title track of the new album reminds me of it in some way, and people seem to be praising it similarly incorrectly.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

'Regret' is only OK really, apart from the first line

Wait, hold on, no love for the last line?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

x-post: don't worry, boots on sauchiehall street is still open. i'll zoom up and get you some audiclean.

station bar tonight, 6pm? (i should really do this over e-mail but i can't be arsed.)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

OK.

Wait, hold on, no love for the last line?

What is it again? (checks)

Oh yeah. No. That's not so good.

The "I was upset you see almost all the time" / "I was a short fuse burning all the time" bit is quite nice too.

Other than that, what have you got? A big "Do we have to?" N.O. Hook hook and a crappy chorus. Pass.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

[muffled explosion from the first floor]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 4 March 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

goddamn when are the Oakland tickets on sale?

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 4 March 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

The "Regret" talk is insane. The lyrics are perfect and the music is perfect. The video rules too - Rome/L.A. etc.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 18:19 (twenty years ago)

Wow, I've always conceived of Regret as being the perfect pop moment.

jae (jazzler), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

That's still true.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

Also, maybe I'll come up for the Oakland show (since I can't deal with Coachella).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

Are there details for this Oakland show?

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

Thanks, Spencer. I think we part ways on Waiting for the Sirens' Call tho. Oh well! One out two isn't so bad.

jae (jazzler), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

My four month old daughter loves dancing to "Krafty."

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

xpost, I'm sure you'll realize your mistake at some point!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 4 March 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

it's at henry j kaiser (blah) on april 29th w/ the chemical brothers. I don't know when tickets go on sale.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

I watched the Touched By The Hand of God video this morning, laughed my arse off.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)

mastered promo update: strange things are afoot. recording has been analyzed and it seems it might be just the opposite. it's probably a pre-mix. vocals not compressed, decible peaks vary too much from song to song, Jetstream sounds unfinished, the vocals in the last chorus on Turn start a split second early etc. confusing to say the least. could this be a test from the record label to find the leak?

biznotic, Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)

could this be a test from the record label to find the leak?

would they really go to all that bother?

unless they want to confuse the issue: ie ensure we all buy a copy because only then will we really know what it's meant to sound like.

soddit, i'll be buying the vinyl - there will be vinyl? - just for the cover art. but given how heavily i'm starting to fall for this album, i'd want to buy it anyway.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 5 March 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

x post: I would love to change my mind. I like the album okay. I don't love it. I think it's better than Get Ready, but wouldn't be in my top 3 or even top 5. I think I have to wait for the final product though, because as people point out, things can change and do sound like they will change, so.

jae (jazzler), Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

I still haven't heard a high quality rip.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 5 March 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)

mine is 192, it sounds very good

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 6 March 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

April issue of Mojo has Ian Curtis on the cover and New Order inside. Can't seem to find a copy in my town yet, though.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Sunday, 6 March 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

xpost, I've listened to various "different" bitrate versions, but they're in fact identical and have quite a few compression problems. Just makes me even more excited for the actual CD.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 6 March 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

Thanks to Biz I've now heard two of the "Krafty" remixes (v. good) and the non-Ana "Jetstream," which does instead have a noticeably different mix in general. Interesting.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 March 2005 05:54 (twenty years ago)

???
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0007TF0T0.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

That is from the amazon.com product page for Waiting..., and here is the back:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0007TF0T0.01.BACK._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)

Also, there's an 'Andy Green remix' of "Krafty" which is very subtly "re-mixed" (I don't think there's any additional instrumentation). I like it more as it's very slightly lusher - but maybe I'm hearing things!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)

that cover is listed as "[IMPORT]" and the label is London/WEA. I wonder if they scoffed at the Saville element.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:28 (twenty years ago)

Also, that Andy Green mix doesn't have the slightly annoying siren sound which I had found a bit jarring. You can hear some nice additional organ too. It's now the definitive version for me.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

There is also a bonus track listed on another '[IMPORT]' called "Choro De Crianca"!! (I don't think this is a Japanese version as it's cheaper than the one without the bonus track!)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand what's going on. neworderonline posted a link to an amazon pic that was supposedly different to the Saville one most of us who are sane love to death, and then you click on it and there's nothing. So...what does that mean? I will be soooooooooo incensed if they change the sleeve. I really will lose it. I do hope this is all a big fat hoax.

I am even having these lovely visions that they will be selling T-shirts at the gig of it...don't take these beautiful dreams away from me!

Also I did think the version of Jetstream sans Ana was very much improved. Wonderful to hear Barney sing the backing bits. It's more rudimentary instrumentally, too. You can hear the dynamics of the band better. I dig.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

the actual designer of the sleeve has been posting on NOOL. he coyly stated he'd let us wait to see what the final sleeve would be. the best theory is that the No cover will be the slip cover and that photo will be the booklet cover. who knows?

biznotic, Friday, 18 March 2005 03:49 (twenty years ago)

But that picture is JUST A BUNCH OF FUCKIN BOATS!

I mean is that all we're going to get for the front sleeve of a new New Order album is a stupid silly picture of nothing but a few stationary boats? For CRYING OUT LOUD TELL ME IT'S NOT SO!

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

What are you talking about, Bimble? When I look at that cover, I see a ship in the harbor, anchored in a shallow bay.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:47 (twenty years ago)

No No No No No No No No No No No No

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 18 March 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)

i heard the bonus track is a cover of "margaritaville." and that the record company is trying to force them to put "sloop john b" on it.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 18 March 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

Again, this Andy Green "remix" nails the essence of the song.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Also, I've seen a "Krafty" cd-single with this more colorful autobahn cover:
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0007SMGKM.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

(and I love the boat cover, Ned OTM! I didn't even think about that).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)

Guardian review.

A few good points, and a few points that make you go WTF??????#*&$@?@?@? Par for the course for Petridis, I suppose.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 18 March 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

the record company is trying to force them to put "sloop john b" on it

but ... but ... that would be brilliant!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

x-post: petridis's three favourites are mine too, which is ... interesting. mind, i've always had a soft spot for the guy.

[hears marcello's angry footsteps; ducks]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 18 March 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)

Terrible review.

"But nor have they released a consistently great album since 1989's Technique."

But nor did they release a consistently great album prior to 1989's Technique, duh.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 18 March 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

So, according to neworderonline.com (http://www.neworderonline.com/News.aspx?NewsID=971), NYC tix go on sale this Friday, but there is something called a free.loader presale on Thursday. Does anyone know what this is?

57 7th (calstars), Monday, 28 March 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)

Why does the western side of the Atlantic get this album a FULL MONTH later than the UK??

Richard K (Richard K), Monday, 28 March 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)

barney's going to sail the first batch over in his boat.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 28 March 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)

I will buy the import as soon as I see it!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

Why does the western side of the Atlantic get this album a FULL MONTH later than the UK??

No offense, but the US getting release dates way way after the UK date is like ancient history, man. Been going on for 20 years at least. It's a law of physics at this point. It's something you can pretty well count on, except in rare cases: for example I think Radiohead managed a dual release date once. It's something that has irritated me greatly over the years, this delayed release date thing, but I don't expect it to change.

barney's going to sail the first batch over in his boat.

No. Hear me? I SAID

No.
No.

There will be No boats, harbours or any such thing on the sleeve or heads are going to roll. And I don't trust Barney out in that boat, either. Row him to shore where he's safer. I don't expect him to get the album to me by risking his life on the open seas.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 28 March 2005 06:08 (twenty years ago)

but the US getting release dates way way after the UK date is like ancient history, man

Not for the MIA album! I think we may have got the Daft Punk a day early too.

Also, my UK copy has the No cover. The boats are inside.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

Disappointingly tepid DaveR review in Pitchfork today. A whole paragraph on "Working Overtime"? Seems like it might be missing the point.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)

I thought the review was good overall, but a couple of misguided comparisons (XTRMNTR-Get Ready, Working Overtime-Crystal) drag it down a lot.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

I blame hstencil.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

the review would have been better if the guy had, like, checked the fucking names of the songs etc. jesus wept.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

two questions for david:
1) where is the connection between get ready and xtrmntr except gillespie being on both?
2) what did xtrmntr do better? that album was hardcore trash going nowhere. get ready at least was a solid listenable album.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

Well written Dave, but it seems like you're not feeling the same perfect orange colored No pop joy that this record is bringing me.

Also, I liked XTRMNTR much more than Get Ready which is described well.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

One unsatisfying answer for Alex coming up: I hear similarities in those records, in the way they "did their thing", the way they sounded. I liked what XTRMNTR did; I wasn't so hot on what Get Ready did. Given you think XTRMNTR was "hardcore trash going nowhere", I don't think we're gonna be seeing eye-to-eye on this.

Spencer: y'know, one reason I'm not as "WOOOOOOOOOOO!" as you about Sirens' Call is probably because, um, I'm not you. ;) And I'm assuming the "well-written" complement - thanks! - is aimed @ my NO write-up, not my sub-pithy one-liner.

BTW, Spencer, if you & Barry could tell me what new album you're going to geek out about next, I'd appreciate it, as that'll let me know what I'll be writing about next on the 'Fork (to your mild-to-severe chagrin, no doubt).

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

what did xtrmntr do better?

TS: "shoot speed kill light" vs "rock the shack" ...

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

ah! i see, i actually get to hassle the writer. wasn't paying attention there. ok, david, tiny point, but it matters: "i told you" is actually called, umm, "i told you so". i'm guessing (but do correct me if i'm wrong!) that this was your mistake when you filed, and then nobody bothered to check?

if something so simple is incorrect, i'm afraid you lose me straight away. i deal with this kind of thing every day, it saps my soul, and my response is always the same: if a publication can't even get the name of a song right, why should we trust its writers on anything else?

this is not personal! it's just a big, big beef about standards. especially on the web (cf my comments on the pitchfork thread).

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

David, yes, your review must be well written because even though I disagree, I don't want to damn you and Pitchfork (which is what I usually do with Pitchfork reviews I hate).

As for what's next, I can't see myself getting this excited unless The Avalanches release something later this year. I'll look forward to your rated meh+ review!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

Point taken, grimly. It probably was my mistake - I've been making plenty of grammatical / factual boners this past month, so I wouldn't put it past myself. FWIW, I'm the same way when I read something that makes a really really really dumb mix-up or misappropriation - I saw one in my local paper a week or so ago that was just OMG - so, yeah, when I get called on it, I feel about this small and just as smart. In my defense, I'd like to think that forgetting a preposition at the back-end of a rather generic song title (gee, thanks, New Order - take yr cues from Capt. Beefheart next time, would ya?) isn't the worst thing that could happen, but, yeah, my bad.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

New Order opens their Back to Mine mix with "Big Eyed Beans from Venus"!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

See, THAT song title, I'd get right!

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

what i find really strange about the primal scream comparisons is that you seem to be making them with the wrong album, david. waiting for the siren's call sounds much more like primal scream than get ready. not like xtrmntr though. morning, night and day and working overtime both have this primal scream vibe to them. the former the dancey vibe of screamadelica, the latter more the rockn'roll vibe of the rolling stonesy album after.

by the way i like your review quite a bit. especially the way it gets more and more enthusiastic from beginning to end. not enthusiastic enough though...

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

I think this record has a really strong New Order vibe.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

BTW, Spencer, if you & Barry could tell me what new album you're going to geek out about next, I'd appreciate it, as that'll let me know what I'll be writing about next on the 'Fork (to your mild-to-severe chagrin, no doubt)

Haha, I really want to take you up on this (first the Low album, and now New Order).

Had I written the review, I would have given it about the same mark (~ 8/10) and been equally critical (but more toward the tracks in the middle, rather than the ones at the beginning). So, I think the review is a fair assessment of the album, but nonetheless, I still have no idea how "Crystal" and "Working Overtime" have the same sense of purpose.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

I could barely make it through the first eight tracks of this album. I fear having to listen to it again.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)

I'm listening to it for the first time right now and my first impression is good! I thought Get Ready was terminably bland, so I wasn't expecting to be wowed by this band again. And I'm not wowed, per se, but at least they aren't self-consciously rock out anymore.. "I Told You So" sounds like that lost Engima remix of Ace of Base that we have all been searching for.

Yngwie AlmsteenMay (sgertz), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

i've just done a CD for my cousin, and "waiting for the sirens' call" is on there, after "very" by moby and before "peach, plum, pear" by joanna newsom. it works exceptionally well.

it's an undeniable classic. so is "krafty". and i love and adore "working overtime". but after 20 listens or so, my flirtation with the rest is pretty much over. it's a good album, and i will listen to it occasionally, but it's not what i hoped it'd be; or, indeed, what i thought for a glorious couple of days that it was. ach well. at least it's a good metaphor for life.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)

I never ever listen to "Working Overtime". It would have been a funny b-side, but it's at worst a stain on the rest of the record which is pristine New Order goodness.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)

Lyric question. On the title track, what are people hearing in the chorus?

I won't desert you
I don't know what to say
I really hurt you
I nearly gave it all away
I got it ('on' or possibly 'all')
'cause you ('were not the one'?)
and I don't know where to turn
when you're gone
when you're gone

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)

I am LOVING this album. This is better by far than I had expected. Some thoughts :

Who's Joe - what an opener! skyscraping, anthemic, moving.... the guitars and bass sound so good locked together. Sounds a million times more powerful than the empty bluster of Rock The Shack

Hey Now What You Doing - OMG! brilliant stuff. I love the way that Phil's guitar on the first instrumental break is all Johnny Marr-ish and controlled, but him and Barney just totally let rip on the next two breaks.

Title track - beautiful. I didn't think they could do something so elegant yet driving and uplifting any more. The second 'when you're gone' that Barney sings at the end of the chorus is wonderful in itself - a small, significant pop moment - and wonderful in the way that it slides headlong into Hooky's lovely bassline as it picks up the pulse again. The guitars on the verse do *that thing they used to do* back in the days of Lonesome Tonight, Sunrise et al, and the keyboards on the chorus are monumental. The keybd break from around 3.00 to 3.30 reminds me of side 2 of Brotherhood for some reason - maybe it's the timbre and orchestral feel.

Morning Night And Day - I love the intro - the first part, just before the sequencer comes in, seems to be about to launch Neil Tennant upon us. The four little filtered chords just before the vocals are really neat - I love the way that they're not overdone, but just keep popping up throughout. Another great chorus, nice bubbling sequencers etc.

Dracula's Castle - I have to spend more time with this one, but I definitely approve of the piano intro/outro.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 March 2005 11:33 (twenty years ago)

I will have to listen again. I found it utterly deflating on first listen.

Dracula's Castle reminds me of Duckula's Castle for some reason.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:04 (twenty years ago)

does anybody else agree with me that "dracula's castle" is the worst name for a new order song ever? good god, it'd embarrass even oasis.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

No, not really

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)

but ... but ... "dracula's castle"! it's just so lame and sad. as a title it's actually - gulp - worse than "rock the shack".

but only just.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

Heh, I was thinking of "Dracula's Castle" as a title the other day and realizing that it made perfect sense as a New Order songtitle because it's mentioned in a verse rather than being the chorus. So no worries.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)

TS: "Dracula's Castle" vs "Dracula's Wedding"

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

It is a terrible title, yes.

PS: Your name is Grimly Fiendish.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 31 March 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

good point, well made.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 31 March 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

first listen i actually really like this album.

(i didn't read the rest of this thread yet...just incase everybody hates it and then i get put off posting my like)

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

Does anybody have that exclusive "Waiting For The Sirens' Call Megamix" that was available for download?
It's gone now, and I'd like to have/hear it.

Edward Bax (EdBax), Friday, 1 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

From The Suburbs Are Killing Us: Krafty (Japanese version)

carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 April 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

the Richard X mix of Jetstream was played on Radio 1 by Pete Tong tonight and HOLY SHIT it's DA BOMB. Seriously, this is one of the best remixes of a New Order song ever. Sounds like the definitive version instantly. This mix should assure massive club play. The first 2 minutes are basically 4/4 house beats with Hooky's bassline over the top and some swirling synths, then the "fasten your seatbelts" samples...

archive is available now!

biznotic, Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)

I really don't like this album.

I like "Krafty", "Morning Day and Night", and "Turn".. kinda.

This pales compared to Get Ready though.

It sounds like a throwaway Electronic album, but with some more layers of guitar in the background.

I think I'll go listen to Revenge now.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 4 April 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

Donut your negative review is so well qualified that it requires no debate from me!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

Sirens' is so rich with hooks and tunes it's well-nigh indigestible. Seriously guys, how about an ambient mood piece or something to give us a chance to catch up?

Actually, I just can't get "Hey Now What You Doing" to stop playing on repeat in my brain. Which is a shame, because it probably means I'll hate the song very soon.

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Haha, that may be the best pop capsule review ever!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 4 April 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

I'm currently in love with 'Turn' which surely will be the official theme song of my summer.
The album sags a bit in the middle (Morning, Night and Day & Dracula's Castle) and I'm not too fond of Hey Joe as an opener, but otherwise this is really great. A
lthough I think Get Ready might be a bit better.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 06:44 (twenty years ago)

I took it back to the shop, such is my dismay at its rubbishness.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

this album takes time to sink in. it's been said before and it will be said again. if you don't give it time, you'll never enjoy it. i really don't see where the hate comes from for this album unless the listener hasn't given it time. oh well, your loss.

on the bright side, Hooky mentioned they were rehearsing WFTSC for the live sets. the remixes of Jetstream will be on promo next week and i found the album and 2 krafty singles this week at Tower Records! bring on the US 2x12"!

ps. Dracula's Castle is ace despite it's terrible name. if you were crying for Technique2, DC is your song.

biznotic, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)

I was saddened to read that NO and Saville have parted ways (apparently NO rejected Saville's proposal for the cover, who subsequently just asked his assistant to come up w something).

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 06:48 (twenty years ago)

That's not exactly how I read it. He's still listed as the art director. Saville's long time collaborator Howard Wakefield worked on the actual design, but I believe they had the same arrangement for some sublime Pulp and Suede covers as well. It still screams Saville and I'm sure whatever portion Wakefield worked on was completed with full approval from him.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

Also, some of the photographs inside are by Saville as is I'm assuming the waste painting (which totally rips me off, btw!).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)

Saville talks about this in Mojo. Apparently his ideas weren't suitable (Saville's opinion, not the band's) because they are too wrapped up in advertising or something, so his partner or whatever was drafted in to put together the big No.

Someone else with a Mojo handy might like to expand on this half-remembered anecdote.

PS: Don't worry, I taped it before I took it back, and I still have the single with the mixes and video on it.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:41 (twenty years ago)

Krafty played on INTER FM Tokyo last night. It's hard to believe how horrible NEW ORDER has become.

Jack Ass (Jack Ass), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I was actually referring to that MOJO thing (the one w Ian Curtis on cover), where Saville explains that his initial idea was to recreate the Power, Corruption and Lies cover, this time using real flowers. That idea was rejected so he just asked his assistant to come up with something instead. The article does say that this is probably the end of his collaboration with NO.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:31 (twenty years ago)

The article does *not* go that far.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)

I forgot about the flowers.

That was a good idea.

Saville didn't do the last one, did he?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)

He did.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)

"Your name is Grimly Fiendish."

I've always assumed that this is because he wears a coat that's black and long and doesn’t know that it's all wrong - although of course it's perfectly possible that I may be mistaken in this respect.

The album? Well it's really a bit New-Order-by-numbers isn't it? Currently listening to iot for the second time and I'm afraid nothing about it's managed to grab any part of me at all so far.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:26 (twenty years ago)

Let it simmer, it's a grower.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

I'm now convinced that this is the best album since Movement. Utterly, utterly classic. The sweep of the first 6 songs is absolutely fantastic - deeply moving stuff. The jury is still out on Dracula's Castle, but of the rest I love the playfulness of Jetstream and Working Overtime. Turn is lovely pop too.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

I'm now convinced that this is the best album since Movement. Utterly, utterly classic.

My! :-) Strong praise but I think well-deserved. Technique rather than Movement remains my 80s NO touchstone in terms of a full album but I definitely think it's the best since that one.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

Choosing best New Order album = rating best bits of the sistine chapel ceiling, i.e there's nowt wrong with Technique (Or Brotherhood, Or PC&L, Or....) but....

...this is so unexpectedly great that I can hardly believe what I hear.

The Uk reviews that I have seen have all been poor : Mojo 2 stars, The Times 3-stars (cockfarmer Paul Connolly), The Gruniad (Petridis).
Is Uc-nt out yet?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

It's in last month's issue, Doc, but also on the wuh wuh wuh here: http://www.uncut.co.uk/music/new_order/reviews/8568

What a tosser that reviewer is.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)

How ome Stylus hasnt reviewed it yet?

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

Haha, I STILL haven't heard this whole album! The first two songs are incredible, though.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

That's last month's issue? I've been done, mate.

I thought the reviewer, although he has obviously swallowed a dictionary and then regurgitated it and then shoved the remnants up his arse using his mum's old plunger, was pretty much spot on, only a bit guarded. Can't for the life of me think why.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

There's a new issue out today, I think. It's got JIMMY PAGE on the cover.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

**The title track, meanwhile, is a superb example of the surging, bittersweet grace of classic New Order, at once Apollonian and mordantly English**

Exactly! You've made my day, Stevie!

Dan - I think you'll really love it.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

Oh I didn't know you could review the review!

Rereading that review, it is more positive than I remembered it, and the words are bigger.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:34 (twenty years ago)

Definitely my album of the year based on the easy and simple factor of how often I have played it. (Behind it are Daft Punk and the ILX Comp II, which among other things features an ode to a woman who looks like Collina. ;-))

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)

Did you really take it back to the shop PJM?

**which among other things features an ode to a woman who looks like Collina. ;-))**

Who's that by then? ;)

It's an album of sublime moments (WFTSC, that is, I haven't heard the ILX Comp yet!). The bass on the chorus of Who's Joe? moves me to tears. The way that Barney sings 'I've got to find you, I've got to find you' on the same song. The transition at the end of the second chorus on the title track when the keyboards come in over Hooky's bass riff. Just beautiful. I realise that this band has a lot of very personal memories for me and that others are (rightly) evaluating it in a squarely 2005 context. See, I can't do that - the best moments of this album do *exactly the same thing* to the 43 yr-old me that Closer and EGG did when I was 18/19. The same feeling as the first time I heard JD do Dead Souls onstage a lifetime ago. If I'm honest the intervening albums since Movement haven't *quite* done it, not even Technique, so I wasn't prepared for this.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

I did take it back to the shop, yes, but if I'm honest it probably has more to do with me feeling guilty about spending a gratuitous tenner than any deep dislike of the record. Having said that, it's true that I got to the last song without having felt anything at all, let alone excitement.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Go get it back - now!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

"the best moments of this album do *exactly the same thing* to the 43 yr-old me that Closer and EGG did when I was 18/19"

Thus far I'm afraid the album's done exactly the same as EGG did for me when I was 18 too - it's left me feeling sad and disappointed but not particularly surprised to be feeling that way.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

What!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

I Told You So sounds like a more polished version of something they would have thrown together for a Peel session in 1982. The same spirit that's behind Turn The Heater On, TooLate, 5-8-6 etc. Magnificent!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 7 April 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)

"What!"

Actually I got in the car to drive home last night last night, turned the CD player on, and rapidly found myself thinking: hey, actually this isn't too bad after all.... that doesn't sound much like Barney 'though.... in fact it sounds more like Richard Butler...?" before I realised I'd already finished the New Order CD and had put the new British Sea Powere one on instead.

Sorry Doc, I do think New Order have done some great stuff over the years, but I'd happily swap their entire recorded output for half an hour of long-lost, newly-discovered, previously-forgotten demos of otherwise unrecorded Joy Division material.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 7 April 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

Yes, well there aren't any!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 7 April 2005 10:41 (twenty years ago)

There's a new issue out today, I think. It's got JIMMY PAGE on the cover.
-- Jerry the Nipper (jerrythenippe...) (webmail), April 6th, 2005 3:08 PM. (Jerrynipper) (link)

I've just bought it! Mine has got Robert Plant on the cover! I had to choose between two equally bad CDs! I chose Robert Plant's compilation! Him mighty hairy! The man in the shop referred to it as "a quality magazine"! I says to him, I says it's all down to Jerry the Nipper, it is!

(I was going to retrieve the New Order album from the bowels of my hard drive last night, but I was too knackered.)

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 7 April 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

I went to the record store yesterday to buy this because I thought it was out in the US. OH THE DISAPPOINTMENT.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 7 April 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)

That is a heavy bummer.

I would have sent you mine if I hadn't taken it back to the shop.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 7 April 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

I like how this thread developed very quietly into a 500+ post monster.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 7 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

*sits back and watches with satisfaction as Dr. C proceeds to lose his marbles over this album*

Bimble... (Bimble...), Thursday, 7 April 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

The article in Mojo really doesn't say for SURE whether it was Saville or the assistant that came up with "No" cover.

But as far as I'm concerned, recreating the Power Corruption & Lies cover with real flowers was about as daft an idea as it gets and the band were well within their rights to reject it.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Friday, 8 April 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

The more I listen to this, the more I hear traces of Technique, stuff like "Guilty Partner" and "Dream Attack", which is all well since the latter is probably my favoirte track of all time. "Turn" might be just as good and manages to capture the same uplifting "this is a new day for a new beginning" feeling. Glorious

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Friday, 8 April 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)

I have listened again, twice. Whilst I was clearly WRONG and it is in fact QUITE GOOD, the feelings it best revived were those I experienced when I listened to it for the first time last Monday, rather than Brotherhood or anything like that.

I think what would be side one is good, but side two is pretty unappealing, especially Jetstream (which appears to be an homage to air hostesses, and I used to live next door to some and they were no fun) and Working Overtime, which is a dreadful letdown at the end of the album, worse than Primal Scream. What a waste of a bass player.

I haven't heard Brotherhood for a very long time, but I think it's a lot better than this.

You were right about that guitar solo, Dr C, the one at the end of some song or other.

I like the title track best.

To their credit, this album is unusual in that you don't spend all your time wondering exactly what it sounds like. It doesn't really sound like anything else.

Naysayers mourning the lack of Joy Division demos may like to investigate the Revenge live album, as reviewed by our old friend JtN. Apparently Hooky cackles piratically.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Friday, 8 April 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)

I really like Jetstream! Am I the only one?

Maybe I need to lower the dosage on these prescription meds...

Lukas (lukas), Friday, 8 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

Jetstream is great and I'm surprised by how much I'm enjoying Ana Matronic's presence on this. I'm also really enjoying the Karoli-stylee guitar at the end of 'Working Overtime'.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:45 (twenty years ago)

I note that the album has plummeted from 5 to 22 in this week's chart.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 11 April 2005 11:49 (twenty years ago)

that's all you have to say about it, marcello?

i am surprised how much you like the album, dr.c. it probably is their most pop release up to now. it reminds me a little of the great first electronic album. the great difference though is how varied the songs are. i still think that the most generic new order song "krafty" is the most soulless track. somehow i have the suspicion that i like the album more for nostalgic reasons than because of its quality.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

has anyone seen them live lately? shall I? I just watched the reading 98 vid last night and Barney's kahkis aside, it was better than I expected (and the JD songs on the DVD do sound amazing, Isolation and Heart and Soul in particular) but I'm afraid of going and being disappointed in their fatness and their lack of energy.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)

But I love POP, alex! I thought you knew that!

I hear some parallels with the first Electronic album, but not many. For me Hooky is key on WFTSC, and even though he's not so prominent, Steve Morris too. Even though it's obviously sync'd and sequenced to hell, and probably not even played on an acoustic kit, no-one else could have played the drums on Who's Joe or the ttle track exactly like *that*.

Like you, I had some reservations about Krafty for a while, but I love it now. The final half of the song is just classic New Order.

Kyle - I saw them in 2002. Six JD songs (Atmosphere, Transmission, She's Lost Control, Digital, LWTUA and... oh I can't remember!), but honestly it wasn't great. Too much autocue from Barney, plus you know pretty much what they're going to play these days, as they have everything pre-programmed. That's not to say that 2005 won't be better with the new material. I hope it is.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

I saw the video for "Krafty" last night. This song is godhead.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

Too much autocue from Barney, plus you know pretty much what they're going to play these days, as they have everything pre-programmed

but people have been saying that since before they toured for Technique. I know I'm not going to get Taras Shevchenko (unfortunately). I'm afraid I'll feel like I lost my chance if I don't catch them this time though.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

You're right.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

yes of course i knew your faible for pop, doc. but somehow i thought you preferred the early more dance-orientated new order.

i saw them live once on the loreley festival 1992. they played after sonic youth and god were they shite after that phantastic guitar thunderstorm.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm gonna see'em at Coachella in a couple of weeks. Will report back.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

I know I'm not going to get Taras Shevchenko (unfortunately).

Why not? Do you mean "get" or "get"? (It is in print on DVD here in the US)

Spencer Chow in Rio, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

i mean when I see them live, it's not going to be that experience (I have that DVD)

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

Yeah took me awhile to figure that one out too, Spencer!

I'll be seeing them in Oakland on the 29th of this month. Will report back, obv. Not expecting miracles, I suppose but also feel like this might be my only chance etc.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)

They were great fun in Mountain View several years back with Billy Corgan - they were making fun of him quite a bit. I was standing right near Arthur Baker who was *really* into it.

Spencer Chow in Rio, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

I really can't stand Barney's onstage banter. I mean "Don't walk away / WOOOAHH! / In silence..." wtf?

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

I just downloaded "Turn." Beautiful melody, kin to "All The Way" or "Love Less," with Morris' drums a standout. Barney sounds like he took voice lessons and the strain shows.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

**yes of course i knew your faible for pop, doc. but somehow i thought you preferred the early more dance-orientated new order.**

Well yes, my favourite New Order stuff is Movement, Ceremony, EGG, Temptation etc etc, but this new album is NEARLY AS GOOD!! Musically v.different, but a v. similar emotional effect.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

I really can't stand Barney's onstage banter. I mean "Don't walk away / WOOOAHH! / In silence..." wtf?

I actually find those kinds of things really hilarious! He's said that those old JD songs are "quite heavy to listen to these days."

Spencer Chow in Rio, Thursday, 14 April 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)

Barney sounds like he took voice lessons and the strain shows.

Er. Do you really mean to use the word "strain" there? Because if he took voice lessons, you shouldn't be able to hear any strain at all.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 14 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

Turn is lovely pop too.

I do hope you realize now what faint praise this is, Dr. C.

I enjoyed this particular quote of yours quite a bit -

I Told You So sounds like a more polished version of something they would have thrown together for a Peel session in 1982. The same spirit that's behind Turn The Heater On, TooLate, 5-8-6 etc. Magnificent!

I just wish they would do a good old fashioned vinyl 12" of "I Told You So" - you know, this 10 minute long version or something where they lose all control...bongo players come in, horns, sheer insanity...but I'm probably just dreaming. Isn't Jetstream the next single?

No, the first post of this thread says it will be "Hey Now What You Doin'" (AKA Road To Ruin). Damn!

**thinks for a moment**

DARE WE HOPE FOR B-SIDES????????

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 04:41 (twenty years ago)

Also, about Krafty, which is a track I don't talk about much -
it reminds me of the video of Bizarre Love Triangle, and then by association it reminds me of the song itself. I can't explain why this happens.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

The BLT clip is my favorite music video ever.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:17 (twenty years ago)

That's cause you're a real...UP person.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

Some people just love Bacon, Lettuce & Tomato sandwiches.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 April 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

Isn't Jetstream the next single?

well, i've got a promo of it sitting on my desk. the cover is pish.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 17 April 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

"Er. Do you really mean to use the word "strain" there? Because if he took voice lessons, you shouldn't be able to hear any strain at all."

If you took voice lessons to help mediocre pipes, the strain will show. Anyway, it's just speculation. Besides, if Barney sang any better, I'd like him less.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 17 April 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

Is it fair to say the Entertainment Weekly review is outright retarded? Not for the sentiment, but for all the odd inaccuracies. "Past few albums?" "Blue Monday sound?" "I'm going to slit my wrists now lyrics?" WTF?

"On their past few albums, especially 2001's rock-infused Get Ready, New Order showed us that they were a band eager to evolve. Now they're ready to undo all that evolution, making a satisfying return to the Blue Monday sound of their heyday. As Waiting for the Sirens' Call proves, the pioneering newwavers' intricate mix of driving keyboards, I'm-going-to-slit-my-wrists-now! lyrics (their eighth studio album boasts such future Xanax-withdrawal mottoes as ''I took my heart to Dracula's castle in the dark''), and airy vocals (Scissor Sisters' Ana Matronica lends an assist on ''Jetstream'') still feels novel — even downright fresh — 25 years later. The perfect soundtrack to a nihilistic day. Grade: B+"

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

that is fucking horsewank. jesus christ.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)

Hah! Roll over Ian Curtis ''I took my heart to Dracula's castle in the dark''! SCARY!

This sounds like a Coumbia House write-up...

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

Why is it I almost always agree with Entertainment Weekly's grades but the copy that goes along with it causes immense cognitive pain?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

Can we safely say that we all received a free subscription to EW because we bought something at Best Buy and now are hopelessly hooked on it and look forward to it every week?

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 13:26 (twenty years ago)

Yes, because fucking "KRAFTY" is so nihilistic & soul-scouring, it makes me wanna slash my wrists with fucking CANDY! Sweet jeebus!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

What is fucking candy (I assume we can eat it)?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

I didn't know you could get UNCUT reviews on line.

JtN's review was possibly a better review than the LP is an LP.

Like JtN I like the title track. Apart from that it is not so great.

It is odd to see the Doc praising it - I could swear he was dismissing it last time I saw him.

the bluefox, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

no, he's always loved it. oddly. i find it mediocre. dr C in off-the-money shock (compare and contrast with this)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

you are both wrong. krafty is shite (old new order without the spark) and the rest of the album is pretty good. movement was better though. but that was a while ago. when there was much more music around that could excite me. and the ... sirens call is one of the best albums i have listened to from this year. the best, to be honest.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)

[chokes on his copy of the M83 album/low album/boom bip album/hood album/arcade fire album/etc]

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

The John Bush review over at All Music Guide is pretty harsh too. Although he doesn't make a point I had stupidly not noticed: "Krafty" is titled as such because of its motorik similarity to Kraftwerk.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 06:51 (twenty years ago)

"Hey Now What You Doing / Don't Go Down The Road To Ruin"

Bernard: “It’s fresh. It doesn’t remind me of anything we’ve done before. I was thinking of a lad from Moss Side when I was writing the lyrics.”

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

**It is odd to see the Doc praising it - I could swear he was dismissing it last time I saw him. **

Uh? Did we talk about this? I remember talking about the Psychedelic Furs. I dismissed them I'm sure.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:21 (twenty years ago)

No, you didn't. You said you liked their first LP a lot and had only gone off them because of the seeming misogyny of Talk Talk Talk. Then you got distracted by that lassie.

So - you DO like the New Order LP, simple as that?

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

But she was a nice lassie!

Yes I love the New Order LP. I said so upthread.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:42 (twenty years ago)

hmm. i seem to be the only one who thinks that this album is terrible. a lot of it sounds vaguely elevator muzak-y to me (anaemic melodies overwhelmed by supershiny production), and lyrics that read like someone went through a bunch of "inspirational" greeting cards and strung together bits that rhymed.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 10:02 (twenty years ago)

B-b-but - "Don't go down the road to ruin"!?

the dreamfox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 11:13 (twenty years ago)

does the road to ruin lead to dracula's castle?

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 11:15 (twenty years ago)

So I got the album yesterday. The glistening production is yummy; the Technique comparisons work, and work against the album. "Who's Joe" and "Hey Now what You Doing" seem like the same song: Electronic outtakes from "Raise The Pressure" with Hookarama galore giving them bottom.

It gets better. "Krafty," "Turn," and the title track ahve already gotten much love, so I'll skip'em. Instead, concentrate on "Guilt Is A Useless Emotion," which is the dance hit we've wanted from them for years. Give this one a proper remix and it'll storm the dance charts.

I'll post back when I've absorbed the rest.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:07 (twenty years ago)

Lauren, you are not alone.

I thought you were going to tell us you were the lassie referred to above.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)

there's a RICHARD X remix of the next single.
Popjustice bigs it up.

piscesboy, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)

The album's OK, but the shit lyrics do ruin it for me, and I think that's always been the case for me with New Order. Mediocre and banal lyrics don't ruin a song, but cringemakingly bad ones do. I know some people find it a part of New Order's charm, or consider it "rockist" to worry about the lyrics, but it spoils it for me.

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)

as i've said before, i think "krafty" is one of bernard's best lyrics yet.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)

ps - dismissing the psychedelic furs while praising wftsc strikes me as very, very wrong indeed.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:19 (twenty years ago)

They've got violence, wars and killing too
All shrunk down in a two-foot tube
But out there the world is a beautiful place
With mountains, lakes and the human race

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)

i would have rejected that from our high school literary mag.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)

You can love the P-Furs and like WFTSC. And song lyrics aren't poetry.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

No, song lyrics aren't poetry, but doggerel is doggerel.

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

Oh for goodness sake, not the lyric thing again. (Rolls eyes)

Yes, you *can* love the Psychedelic Furs and New Order. It's just that I don't.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:35 (twenty years ago)

They've got violence, wars and killing too
All shrunk down in a two-foot tube

if you don't appreciate the barney-esque genius of that couplet, you are beyond hope. it's absolutely perfect.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

and believe me: i'm not an apologist for this album. not by any means.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

I have never understood criticizing song lyrics based on how they read. That's really not the point of them AFAIC; it's akin to criticizing the prose in a book for sounding clunky when read out loud.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

Violence, wars and killing too... what, as opposed to wars and no killing? I love that "too".

I don't criticise lyrics based on how they read. I cringe when Barney sings them as well.

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

And what's that line about the "shoulder holster" in "Hey Now What You Doing"? I thought, "Yeah!!"

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)

You can kill people without having a war, you know!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

the magnetic poetry level of the lyrics bothered me when i first heard the songs. nothing to do with how they read. i suppose if i thought the album was musically strong, it wouldn't matter nearly as much. as has been pointed out before on this thread, lyrics were never something they did particularly well.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

it's akin to criticizing the prose in a book for sounding clunky when read out loud.

This seems to imply that prose should not be read aloud - that reading-aloud is an unnatural habitat for prose. Yet that view seems to me false.

We have all been speaking prose all our lives (except, of course, Elton Welsby, who speaks poetry).

It is true that pop lyrics are not just words on a page - that they have other effects. We have all been over this before, many a time I dare say. But it is also true that if we want to work out, or argue, that, or why, a pop lyric is good or bad, we can make a fair start by writing it down, and seeing how it plays. In any case, on ilx writing is the only option: we cannot sing to each other in our posts.

I think that Z. is correct: Sumner's lyrics often, though not always, sound bad when he sings them, let alone when anyone writes them down.

the bluefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:29 (twenty years ago)

All that said - I still think that the title track is perfectly fine, and the image of a sailing ship, if that's what it is, in the first verse, quite touches me. I also don't dislike, I think, the penultimate track.

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

*bursting with excitement about what is going to happen this Friday night in Oakland*

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

I also don't dislike, I think, the penultimate track.
that's turn. absolutely wonderful. melancholy and melody married in a miraculous way.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

I think Sumner writes sublime lyrics and they work well with his voice. There were clunky lyric problems on Get Ready and minor annoyances on this record too, but to say that the melodies are anaemic means that you hear music differently than I do - which is not a criticism, but seriously for me, the songs on this record are incredibly strong in the hooks and melody department.

Going to see them play live at the Jimmy Kimmel taping tonight - I know a writer on the show so cross your fingers for my green room access hopes!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

Yes - 'Turn' did impress me.

Perhaps it is even as good as 'Turn' by Travis?

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 15:55 (twenty years ago)

i don't know that travis song but i'd be very much surprised if that wasn't ironyfox.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

basically, a lot of the album strikes me as something written in their sleep. not effortless, mind, but lazy.. kind of like someone turned on a new order generator™.

xpost - prepare to be surprised.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

Indeed. Travis's ... oeuvre has its ... longeurs: some of their LP tracks drift too aimlessly though they have some melodic spring hidden somewhere. But their 45s are quite consistent, 'Turn' among them. I like very much the way the melody swings up and down, and hits notes just off what you might expect: it is nice to sing a harmony to it. It is not an outstanding lyric, I suppose, but the overall sound of the record pleases me. I think it has a guitar part that I like, but I cannot think what it is - perhaps I am imagining it.

So you can see that for me to compare New Order's 'Turn' to Travis's is a compliment.

I also like a 45 that I have never owned, but has a really nice 12-string intro, I think: 'Coming Around'.

Maybe I need Travis: the Singles.

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

Well, I'm happy because it seemed like the generator was on the fritz for the last record!

Actually, I'm only disappointed because of the detail that's been missing since their baroque extended dance-pop workouts from the mid-80s (like "Perfect Kiss" etc).

Also, the Travis I've heard has been very boring and not melancholically wistful at all like New Order's "Turn".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

"detail" is the exact word, i think. that's what i'm missing, dreadfully missing.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

Well, I thought it was mostly missing from "Technique" too, even though it's my favorite NO album. But the songs here are excellent nonetheless - the title track makes me swoon every time.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

One thing I do really like about this record are the little echo-ing arrangements, like in "Turn" after Barney sings "it's time for me to go" and the bassline sort of repeats the line for emphasis. There's another moment on "Krafty" where a guitar part comes in on top of a bass part in almost a round - it's almost like they're arguing but then it completely breaks free into this sublime "solo".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

I probably described that terribly but maybe Dan can put it into proper musical terminology.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

TS: detail vs technique

You are mistaken, I think, to accuse Travis of a lack of wistful melancholy. Try 'More Than Us', or even in its way 'Why Does It Always Rain On Me?' - another very good little 45.

the rainfox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

Also, the Travis I've heard has been very boring and not melancholically wistful at all like New Order's "Turn".

Actually, "melancholically wistful" is a pretty good description of Travis.

xpost, pinefox agrees!

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

OK, I'll check them out, but I remember not liking the guys voice.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

The "it sounds like so-and-so on auto-pilot/parodying themselves" objection to a once-loved artist's new work is such a common reaction/criticism, but I am suspicious of it.

I don't think artists of such standing are generally lazy "will this do" merchants. I'm sure they are trying their best. So why does it so often sound different to us?

Part of my suspicion about the whole thing is rooted in the lack of consensus from fans about which tracks exhibit this autopilot/song generator thing. As I have said many times, the moment I first heard 'Regret', that was the way I felt about it. Few seem to share this view, but it's all over that song for me ("Oh here we go, here's the big hook, oh and here's the big Hook").

Yet 'Krafty' and 'Turn', which some accuse of being warmed-up mediocrity above, sound (respectively) wonderfully invigorated and touchingly stoic to me, in a way that the feted 'Regret' and WFTSC title track do not?

I think I have may have reached the end of the road for articulable appreciation and criticism in this area. Actually, perhaps I have more to say about 'Krafty'. Why did no one ever mention that it is all about the kick of the drums bringing things full circle to 'She's Lost Control'? Then moving on, and up.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

All the various Spencer notations I wish to echo. There is, for all that there is a lot of production and studio assemblage and etc. that went into this record, a seemingly effortless grace about much of it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

I don't think I understand the last two sentences of Alba's post, but otherwise it seems to me to brim with a kind of provocative, uncertain intelligence. It also - and this point may best be taken separately from my praise - looks faintly like a parody of me.

the bellefox, Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

My pinefox generator™ arrived today.

The moment I head Krafty, it seemed obvious to me, but no one else seems to think so. If it isn't obvious to all, I suspect it's me at fault. But I can pretend.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

the album is ok, it does sound a bit lacking in excitement, but I think that's as much because the formula they're following is not as exciting as it was, or indeed, as the old examples of the formula currently are. It's a similar thing when Madonna releases stuff nowadays.

The two Stuart Price tracks are the best, I think.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

those stuart price tracks jetstream and especially guilt is a useless emotion to me are examples of new order on autopilot or the just mentioned new order generator. together with krafty they are the tracks i like less. that fucking lifeless drum machine beat on guilt... drives me crazy. when i listen to it my head feels like being smashed against a wall continuously.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)

did no one find this album a tad sterile sounding and even a bit dated?

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

for anyone wot cares, i say things about new order here.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

They're on Kimmel in about ten minutes.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 28 April 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

I also like a 45 that I have never owned, but has a really nice 12-string intro, I think: 'Coming Around'.

it's by far their best song. and it was apparently concieved as a b-side.

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Thursday, 28 April 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)

Ah, New Order live ... delightfully shambolic, as always

(actually that a bit dramatic. But it *was* just the right amount of messy)

and now they're doing LOVE WILL TEAR US APART

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 28 April 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)

There is a seemingly effortless grace about much of it.

This is the key similarity to Technique for me.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 28 April 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)

They were great! 2 tracks on the show and then 6 more because they said they hadn't had enough rehearsal time for Coachella. Very tight and Bernard's voice sounded great. Stephen hasn't changed a bit. The new guy is not annoying. Hooky is very cool. "TRANSMISSION"!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

Sounded even better on the broadcast. Barney really has taken some singing lessons and sounds great! I love what he did with "Love Will..."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 07:20 (twenty years ago)

I recently subtitled the green room at Jimmy Kimmell on Entourage. Apprently it is full of "hotties" who "roll in packs". Everyone has it off with everyone else. I am excited to finally meet someone who has been there.

I like the lyrics to Thieves Like Us, but I suppose you could make a case for them being stupid. They are, however, a bit more on the edge, a bit more desperate. This applies to most "early" New Order, I think, with one or two exceptions. By "early", I think I mean "real", as in prior to any splits and reunions and whatnot.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 28 April 2005 08:35 (twenty years ago)

I bought this album yesterday! Will listen to it today.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 11:20 (twenty years ago)

About time, sir! I guess it'll make it a bit easier for you to wait for the POSTER!

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

So I've listened to the first half of the album and it's great! One thing I don't understand, though; why do people who dislike Get Ready like this album? Did Get Ready have too much cavern reverb on it?

Also, the first half of this album is basically "Barney sings the 'Gun Porn EP'" which makes it even more awesome.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I take it back; this album is a whole bunch of remixes of "Let's Go" (and that is why it is awesome).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

OMG "JETSTREAM" IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

AH finally somebody appreciates this fine tune!

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)

OH WOW okay so they saved all of the superfantasticawesome songs for the second half of the album??? "Guilt Is A Useless Emotion" = SWOON.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

Why is it I almost always agree with Entertainment Weekly's grades but the copy that goes along with it causes immense cognitive pain?

They like it that way. Trust me.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Dude, I've always liked "Jetstream!" I should have said more up above. Anyway, I am v. glad Mr. Dan likes. :-) And yeah, "Guilt" is just GREAT, every time I hear it start now I'm all, "Nice..."

They were great! 2 tracks on the show and then 6 more because they said they hadn't had enough rehearsal time for Coachella. Very tight and Bernard's voice sounded great. Stephen hasn't changed a bit. The new guy is not annoying. Hooky is very cool. "TRANSMISSION"!!!

No I'm not jealous. I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU. No, not jealous at all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha! I can totally respect that, Je4nne.

The "Let's Go" comparison completely falls down once you hit "Dracula's Castle" but comes back full-force with "Turn". So right now I think this album is a gigantic slice of wonderfulWTF between to giant hunks of "Let's Go".

New Order is so awesome.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

"Guilt" is so 1993 though. In a good way!

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

I still say "Guilt" is a Very era PSB track - i.e. it's AWESOME. And I LOVE "Jetstream" too, I just haven't worn out on my initial faves yet.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Setlist last night

on air:
Krafty
Love Will Tear Us Apart

after the show:
Waiting for the Sirens' Call
Crystal
Temptation
Waiting for the Sirens' Call (again! - was unsure why)
Transmission

I feel like I'm forgetting something...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

During Temptation Hooky went out into the crowd to our area which was slightly seperated from the tiny main pit. A girl said "thank you" and he quickly responded "your welcome" in a very nice way. Also Stephen is very gracious.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

I feel like I'm forgetting something...

Yeah, me being summoned by teleporter.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

http://media.neworderonline.com/video/wmv/New%20Order%20-%20Love%20Will%20Tear%20Us%20Apart%20(Live%20@%20Jimmy%20Kimmel%202005-04-28).wmv

vid's up

kingfish maximum overdrunk (Kingfish), Thursday, 28 April 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Bought this one a few days ago, and I have to say I am quite impressed. Their songwriting was rather strong on the previous one too, but I like how they are now starting to incorporate more electronic elements into their music again. Their comeback is surprisingly impressive so far.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)

THIS IS WHERE I SHAMELESSLY PLEAD FOR INFORMATION ON AVAILABLE TICKETS FOR THE CHICAGO SHOW MAY 3. Seriously, I've never seen them - being that they never tour and if they do, they always go to three or four cities, none of which are ever Detroit.
Two tickets please. Please?
stgertz@gmail.com

Steve Gertz (sgertz), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

ha philip, I just read that whole article an hour ago but didn't look at the byline until you just linked it. great write up. so are you going to oakland tomorrow?

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

I forgot, Hooky teased everyone with a measure of the "Ceremony" intro, so hopefully they'll play that!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)

spencer are you coming up tomorrow or are you just seeing them at coachella?

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

I broke down and am buying a ticket for Coachella on Sunday - I really want to see MIA too that day.

However, I think I will be coming up to SF sometime in the next few weeks. I really want to hang with SFxors!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

Dammit, same here about the hanging w/SF crew. HMMM. Keep me in the loop, and have fun on Sunday. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

M'kay, two days have passed since purchasing the album and I can't get friggin' "Turn" out of my head. Help!

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

Sounds like you've got the fever! And the only prescription? More "Turn"!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

Keeping away from Coachella might help, Spencer. I got a ticket for Sunday's show, which I unfortunately can't attend. Any takers?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:40 (twenty years ago)

Sorry Alfred, antibiotics won't help, you have to let the infection run its course. Now I can prescribe an nsaid for the swelling, but that's about all I can do.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 28 April 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

I never never never never never never never never wanna hear this album again.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 29 April 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)

I forgot, Hooky teased everyone with a measure of the "Ceremony"

i've seen them at festivals over the past few years, and they've always played 'ceremony.'

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 29 April 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

good! this is a rare case where I don't care if someone has turned into an oldies act.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 29 April 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://www.acuterecords.com/neworder.jpg

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

i thought that worked. click on link if you so desire...

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)

Nice!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

(also, over 800x600 will usually not display)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

I wish I was up in SF this weekend as opposed to last weekend. Are NO and the Chemical Brothers playing the same show or is it separate?

Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Peter Saville designed skateboards??? WTF?
http://www.beinghunted.com/v40/reviews/2005/march/supreme/_images/pic_06.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 29 April 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

it was the same show. I'm not a chemical brothers fan, they were alright I suppose. New Order were just short of phenomenal. Opened with She's Lost Control, which was incredible but not really a good opener; followed with Love Vigiantes (got a better response actually) and then Regret. New songs were a weird mixed bag: Krafty (good), title track (great), Hey Now What You Doing (don't know why they played this), maybe something else? No Turn or I Told You So unfortnately. Oh yeah, Jetstream: blah. JD songs: LWTUA (started incredibly, kind of lost steam a bit), Transmission (godlike). Crystal: incredible. Something else of Get Ready: bad. Bizarre Love Triangle: fun. True Faith: incredible. Temptation: incredible. Blue Monday: of course, incredible.

Hooky is the man of the hour, really, he makes this band. New guy is excellent.

Biggest drawback: no Ceremony and no Isolation. Otherwise, this vastly exceeded my expectations.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)

x-post: can someone with more time on their hands "translate" the colour-coding on those skateboards? if not, i'll do it myself later. much later.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)

good god, love vigilantes? transmission? jesus. i couldn't go - am up here in portland oregon. now i'm really effing bummed.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Saturday, 30 April 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)

barney's stage banter : "we're going to bore you to death with another song from our new album. but it's the title track and it's actually an alright song". "I'm too old for this" "we're playing alright tonight for once; that's why there's no running around. it's either jump about and play like shit or stand still and play okay"

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:38 (twenty years ago)

"we're going to bore you to death with another song from our new album. but it's the title track and it's actually an alright song"

so does that mean he thinks there's a substantial amount of substandard material on WFTSC too? in that case: why fucking release it? grr.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

"this is bizarre love triangle. it's about something that happened between ian, hooky, and stephen that they don't like to talk about anymore"

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

re grimly's comment: maybe, but I just read it more as people not really being pumped to hear new tracks live. the album just came out this week and most people there probably hadn't even heard it. krafty got a good response though (and so did the title track). I really don't know why they play jetstream.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha.

so does that mean he thinks there's a substantial amount of substandard material on WFTSC too?

Nah - it's just a cute joke about how fans always want the old favourites, surely?

Alba (Alba), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, the song that didn't work at all was Run Wild.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

but let me reiterate that Barney's guitar on Transmission and the opening chords of LWTUA were fucking GODLIKE GENIUS

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

NO always say tongue-in-cheek (? you never know with them) stuff like that, e.g. saying how much they hate Blue Monday but they have to play it because it's their biggest hit. When I saw them in'93 they opened with a bunch of the (new) "Republic" tracks (with "Round and Round" thrown in there somewhere), and when they got to the fifth or sixth one, Barney said "this is the last slow song, you'll be glad to hear".

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

kyle: good point, i forgot the album's only just out in the US.

and yes, i know NO have a long tradition of self-deprecating stage banter etc. it's just ... well, many a true word spoken in jest. if i was barney and i was standing there battering out temptation and LWTUA and the rest, and then i had to play bloody "who's joe", i might just begin to realise that something, somewhere had gone ever so slightly wrong.

but i'm very aware that my impressions of WFTSC are out of sync with most people's on this thread. i mean, it's not a bad album. but, you know, this is new order. they used to be gods, remember?

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

The title track is up there with their best work.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

yes, i'd agree with that. i think it's astonishing. i also love "krafty", particularly in its album form, and i'm a big fan of "working overtime". the rest, though, exists in a range from "hmm, yeh, this is all right" to "hmm, meh, this is ok". and i just don't think that's good enough from this band - especially, as they've proved, they can still write songs as absolutely amazing as WFTSC itself.

i really don't get the "turn" love at all!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

Haha, well I think "Working Overtime" is definitely in their worst 2 or 3 songs ever - it's like a completely different band (Primal Scream). Would have been fun for a piss-take b-side, but as an album closer? No.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

heheh. ain't it wonderful being a new order fan? :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

I think we can agree on that!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 30 April 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)

if i was barney and i was standing there battering out temptation and LWTUA and the rest, and then i had to play bloody "who's joe", i might just begin to realise that something, somewhere had gone ever so slightly wrong.

That's not a fair comparison though. You can't expect any band's greatest hits to stand up to any old album track, no matter how good the album is. Particularly a band that's been around for 20 years and has released as many singles as NO have.

I agree that "Krafty" and "WFTSC" are up there with their best tracks, definitely amongst their strongest 15-20 songs ever. Right now, at least for me, nothing else on the new album approaches those sorts of heights, though.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 30 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

I Told You So is great! It actually sounds like something new for them which is more than you can say for anything on Get Ready or most of the new album.

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 00:59 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, the song that didn't work at all was Run Wild.

Kyle, please don't take this personally, but go eat lizard brains. The hell it didn't! Can you at least cut them some slack because as Barney said afterwards it was the first time they played it live? (indeed, aside from the Kimmel show, this is the first time they've performed live in 3 years!) Personally I thought Run Wild and Crystal (though normally I don't even like Crystal) were the two most transcendent performances of the whole show. Barney had said it was the first time they'd done Run Wild live "so feel free to go get your money back now". To immediately dispel any illusion of inadequacy I yelled out "PERFECT!...PERFECT!" I was fairly close to the stage and it seemed quiet enough that he might have heard me but I can't be sure cause I wear earplugs at gigs. Anyway he then mentioned that it (Run Wild) was "one of his favourite songs...well...as if that means anything, one of my favourite songs..."

I don't recall him saying the bit about "bore you to death" but then it does take a few seconds for my brain to translate Manchester accents so I can't say I'll always catch everything. I do recall him saying something like WFTSC was "actually pretty good, I mean, you know, it's alright..." And with the tone of voice he used, I just took it to mean that he was simply proud of that particular track without being too certain and boastful about it - more pleading like "come on, you have to at least admit this one is pretty good". The accounts of the Kimmel show I've read bear that out, that he's proud of that one. I don't think he was trying to say anything about the rest of the album necessarily other than just being characteristically self-effacing.

I've got pages of notes I've written about the gig. And I've got overall general themes. I thought I would have something nice and complete and concise ready to post here about it for anyone who might be interested. But I'm a bit conflicted now, and still extremely tired and sleepless from the trip. In the end, this was a far more highly personal experience than I might have imagined. The way I EXPECTED it to go wasn't the way it went. Have you ever gone into something thinking you would get one thing, and finding at the end that you got something entirely different but equally if not more valuable than what you expected? That's where I am with it.

I can recount several instances of Barney's entertaining stage banter if anyone here cares.

But I guess for now and in the interest of being as brief as possible, I will stick to general themes. It seems to me that what is going on here is a bit of a courtship ritual, a romance between them and their fans. I've never known anything quite like it. They have ceased to be icons for me now, gods, musicians, performers. More than anything else, I came away with a sense of their humanity. Of flesh and blood and bone. Not so much because I could SEE them, but because of Barney's special way of presenting them, verbally and physically, and Hooky's attempts to reach out - unexpectedly moving to the far opposite edge of the stage from where he had been standing for much of the gig just to make sure that the fans on the other end of the stage could be with him for awhile, too.

And I am not bothered by people who are disappointed because they feel the band are (musically) capable of more. Truth be told, I feel they are capable of more, too. But the fact is they are in a mode right now where they are self-conscious and thinking of the fans. Wanting to please the fans. That's why their set lists are as they are. That's why they steered themselves towards dance music on this album whereas I really get the feeling they'd rather go rock or pop or experiment like on "I Told You So". That's why it's so ironic when they ended with Blue Monday and I found myself bored to death and watching Barney sing it with NO EMOTION WHATSOEVER - completely lifeless compared to all other songs he sang that night - KNOWING full well they are as bored (and probably more so!) with it as I am.

And yet I find myself so intertwined with them at this point, so smitten in this love affair, that I am touched by these gifts of sacrifice and generosity on their part - that they even played the gig at all - that Barney used his aging energy to dance or just freak out like a rock star for a bit (the quote, btw Kyle - was "I'm not as young as I used to be" - he never said "old"). I forgive them even their faults, as I might a loved one. Even if I can agree they are probably capable of more.

At the end Barney said "Well, we tried our best, we hope it's good enough." I am not one to complain at this point. And I thought it especially interesting when he said the bit about "well we either jump around or play the music right - what do you want?" because I was thinking just prior to him saying that that this was exactly the tension being created here - for the first few songs he was amazing at just restraining his enthusiasm enough to work on the vocals, I was so proud. But in the end I wanted him to freak out too - I wanted him to dance and rock out and lose himself in it because in doing so he was reacting to it as *I* would - again, his humanity was what showed through.

I found it a source of amazing inspiration that these people - suddenly now so clearly human as you or I - as human as the lines on Barney's face - could create something so beautiful and god-like.

And I remembered something Alfred Soto had said on the Movement thread which I had meant to comment on and never did. About how Barney still goes about his work as though he was never meant to be the proper singer. That he has no ego. Well, I don't think that's true that he has no ego - I do think he and the band are proud of certain things they've acheived. But yet Alfred Soto's statement encapsulated what has always been so special about New Order. They represent some strange accident of human and god-like. These kids who knew nothing about playing music, heard the Sex Pistols and decided to try hooking up their guitars to Bernard's grandmother's stereo and somehow became famous rock stars.

When they played Transmission I wanted to yell out PUNK ROCK! And "She's Lost Control" sounded so much like the original - Stephen and his weird looking electronic cymbals - that you could literally HEAR Ian's vocals even as Barney sang. It was weird.

Also if anyone wants a description of the T-shirts they were selling, let me know. I got two.

And I must say Phil is a far more attractive bloke than pictures have led me to believe. (even if I didn't spend much time looking at him!) He has a sortof unique shoulder length hairstyle now that suits him well.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

The point is, those who go to Coachella must report here, please. Thanks.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Sunday, 1 May 2005 09:43 (twenty years ago)

t's so ironic when they ended with Blue Monday and I found myself bored to death and watching Barney sing it with NO EMOTION WHATSOEVER - completely lifeless compared to all other songs he sang that night - KNOWING full well they are as bored (and probably more so!) with it as I am.

that's the point of the song . I've never heard a performance of theirs where they sounded like they sang it with any emotion. it's an emotion-free song.

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

All this NO talk makes me happy. :-) Can't wait for a separate standalone LA show...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

when they played she's lost control all I could think of was the scene from 24 Hour Party People where they leave Stephen on the roof

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 1 May 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

xxpost: hmm, the band have admitted many times that they're bored shitless with the song and only play it because they feel they have to ("but it's our biggest hit!") ...

... which leads me to grimly NO peeve #26: since when did they become the kind of band that gave two fucks what the fans think? pah.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 1 May 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

I had a revelation today hearing for the 1st time the 'In Session' version of Rock The Shack, which is completely fantastic and probably their most JD sounding song ever.

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

hey Kyle-

thanks for the rundown of barney's banter. i was side stage and really couldn't make out too much of it. i did however understand the 'we're gonna bore you now' part.. haha. was a great show throughout, i agree, but the JD covers didn't work too well for me with barney's voice. the instrumentation was spot-fucking-on, but the second his vocals kicked in, it seemed kinda weak. that said, everything else was pretty brill.

ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

Thanks for the hat tip, Silent Disco. I intended my comment on the "Movement" thread as a compliment; New Order's success is as much skill as serendipity. Part of what (still) makes them compelling as artists is the sense that, when the music doesn't go horribly wrong, they still touch the sublime. Simple because they're simple.

Frankly, I don't give a toss for grumbles that NO are going out of their way for fans. Any band with their discography circa '82-'89 can do what it wants.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 1 May 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

that's the point of the song . I've never heard a performance of theirs where they sounded like they sang it with any emotion. it's an emotion-free song.

That's true, but I meant on a more physical, visual level than that. Considering every other song they had done had seen him showing some level of enthusiasm, it was clear that here he was bored to death. In the old days, Taras Shevchenko days, he pretty much sang everything with that frozen look on his face, barely moving at all. But now it's different, and that's another thing I find interesting, that the lack of energy shown on Taras by him and Hooky has long since worn away.

Last night I watched the version of Everything's Gone Green on the new Umbrellas In the Sun LTM DVD, and as rough as it is as far as both sound quality and the "unfinished" nature of the song, I think it might just be conclusive proof of the existence of God. Not even 1982 yet and they were doing this. Jaw dropping awe, etc. Yes, I cried. They do that to me sometimes. I cry. This happens. Not new information.

Here's some more Barney banter from the Oakland show:

"This is a song from our new album, which is apparently called 'No'"

"I hope it's not this hot at Coachella. I might have to storm off the stage...like Morrissey did"

"I'd like to let you all have a sip of my wine. [pause] I don't suppose it would last too long, though"

"Where did it all go wrong, house music all night long" (what song was it he said this just prior to? I can't remember - something in the second half, one of the well known oldies)

"This one is for your boys in Iraq" (before Love Vigilantes)

"It's been 25 years since our singer left us so we'd like to remember him with this song with his [Hooky obv.] very nice bass line..." (before She's Lost Control)

"We'd like to do a song for all you disco bunnies out there" (before True Faith)

Before Love Will Tear Us Apart there was an awkward pause and he said "Peter has to start this one" and Hooky said happily and confidently "That's riiiight. [deepened, omnious voice] And I like to take my time, in bed as well as on stage!" Ha ha ha. Hooky also egged the crowd on a lot to sing with LWTUA. Did Barney do this as well? I became confused for a bit cause I was looking down or trying to avoid the more aggressive antagonistic members of the packed-like-sardines crowd I was in, and I looked up thinking it was Barney egging us all to sing along but in fact Barney's lips weren't moving and it was Hooky. Tired of the admonishions, I gave up and sang along, and Hooky went over to Stephen for the only time in the gig and faced him as they finished the song.

As far as Blue Monday went, it was kindof Stephen's moment in the spotlight because the band started it well before Bernard came out on stage again and Stephen had stood up to begin playing a synth so you could see him a lot better than before. He was wearing what looked like a new black t-shirt with this light to medium blue design on it of an anchor and the letter "Y" on one side and "3" on the other. I saw him look at Peter (who was playing those electronic drum pads you see him play in the Perfect Kiss video) and Stephen mouthed with much emphasis "1...2...3..." and counting the numbers off on his fingers. I saw him turn to Phil and do the same thing. I'm not sure what exactly what this might have meant as they had already started the song and it didn't seem to be connected to what they were doing instrumentally. Also an interesting thing happened when Bernard quit singing his part for the song...he went to a keyboard next to Phil's and eventually you heard this (black?) female singer sample. I can't remember what the words were she was singing, it was just one line, but it went really nice with the music and I was rather delighted they'd done at least SOMETHING different to Blue Monday.

Also, at one point in the gig, Barney knocked his mic stand over on purpose. Can't remember what song that was. He also looked like he was pretty close to throwing his guitar at one point, but controlled himself and handed to a roadie. I also love the way he adds those unexpected high pitched whoops here and there. He did this more towards the beginning of the gig. Fabulous stuff.

Well I think I'm finally finished talking about all this for awhile, but I do want to admit that I'm beginning to give some serious thought to whether this new album really is better than Get Ready. I think it's easy to be confused because the highest highs of the new one eclipse anything on Get Ready. But I think Get Ready might be slightly more consistent, has more staying power, a better production sound, and more Gillian. Yes, I do believe I miss her. But one day the children will be grown and maybe she will come back to the fold.

BTW, as has been previously stated, they have nearly enough material already for a new album which they plan on releasing in a year's time? Not sure. One dreads another Radiohead Amnesiac-to-your-Kid-A situation, where a whole bunch of tracks are recorded at the same time and inevitably the second album of those tracks can't match up, but I am honestly so thankful for any tiny little movement of New Order's fingers and beats of their hearts these days. I feel blessed just that they are alive and still doing what they do.

Coachella stories please. I beg of anyone out there. I need Coachella stories.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Monday, 2 May 2005 06:36 (twenty years ago)

But one day the children will be grown and maybe she will come back to the fold.

something in the Mojo interview led me to believe that one of their children has a serious illness and it wasn't just a matter of them being young, is this correct?

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 2 May 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)

Awright, I've absorbed the new album. The mix is so alluring that it takes your critical faculties a few listens to weed out the bad songs ("Dracula's Castle" and "Hey Now What You Doing," which sounds like Hole's "Malibu" only not as touching). I wish "I Told You So" wae a little better than an Ace of Base rewrite crossed with Republic's "Time's Up." And "Jetstream" is just corny - it's a beefier "Liar," also off Republic.

Frankly, I don't know how Barney maintains his boyish exuberance without sounding leaden; "Waiting for the Sirens' Call" and "Turn" are great pop songs, soft like wool but firm as steel thanks to Stephen and Hooky (who sounds marvelous throughout).

The standout track for me - only because no one's mentioned it much - is "Morning Night and Day," which is in the great tradition of "Soone rThan You Think" and "Subculture" - those effortless Bernard I-walk-the-streets-drunk-as-fuck-from-a-night-ofclubbing songs that define the post-Joy Division morning after better than a million "Closer" sequels.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

So who here is going to the show at the Hammerstein Ballroom?

I'm actually DJing between sets at that show. Very exciting, yeah, but also kinda scary for me since I've never done anything quite like that and in front of so many people. Thankfully most people don't pay a lot of attention to that stuff!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

Ned lets hope were not deluding ourselves about an LA show. I was hoping they'd do a non-festival short tour of the US for Get Ready but was left feeling resentlful of the fact that I didnt go to that crappy V2 concert with Moby, as that was their last CA apperance in like, a decade.

Actor Sizemore fails drug test with fake penis (jingleberries), Monday, 2 May 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

something in the Mojo interview led me to believe that one of their children has a serious illness and it wasn't just a matter of them being young, is this correct?

Yes you are right - I recall reading that too now, but I'd forgotten it because I'd read somewhere else more recently that it was just that she wanted to be around to take care of the kids, without any mention of illness. Who knows? I don't even know for sure if there is more than one of them. In any case, here's hoping the kid(s) grow up healthy and strong. :)

I think it's highly unlikely they'll do another LA show this time around. There was talk of adding a New York date in June, and I'm kinda praying for that, but not really having much hope about it either.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 00:40 (twenty years ago)

There was apparently an child illness around the time of Get Ready, but I haven't read any updates on whether it's still going on. I remember at the time thinking it wasn't something terminal, but I can't say at all for sure. Maybe Gillian's just been saddled with raising the kids - I read somewhere that she'd really like to keep playing. She and Stephen are so cute in the World and Regret videos.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

that crappy V2 concert with Moby

Please do not mention this sad state of affairs again. I pretend that did not happen. (I do however regret [har har] not seeing NO with Billy Corgan as the fourth member, which frankly to my mind is a glory and a wonder. As it stands I was out of the country at the time anyway, which is also why I missed the Roxy Music show that summer at the Greek. That I not only regret, I metaphorically tear my hair out over.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

I do however regret [har har] not seeing NO with Billy Corgan as the fourth member, which frankly to my mind is a glory and a wonder

hrm. i suppose tonight's chicago show will be opportunity for this again. c'mon out ned!

john'n'chicago, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

*wonders which bank to rob and/or plane to kindly redirect*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

First i'd like to say Bimble, sorry we didn't meet up in Oakland. I looked for you but didn't see you near the entrance. I had on a longsleeve Dub t-shirt. Oh well, it was a great show anyway.

Second, i've got the recording of the Oakland show but it's missing the first two (She's Lost Control + Love Vig) and Blue Monday. Not a great recording but listenable and a good memory.

Those overpriced shirts were 10bucks cheaper at Coachella.

New Order played a great set on Friday and a not so great set on Sunday. Actually, it was like the old days. Bernard didn't jump around and both him and Peter were in foul moods. The sequencers didn't work on a couple songs and Bernard missed his cue several times even with the aid of a telepropmter.

The mixes for Jetstream should be big club hits. Richard X's mix is hotter than hot and will hopefully find it's way into a wide variety of DJ's boxes. The Arthur Baker mix isn't bad either, in fact, it manages to recapture a touch of that late 80's sound that he helped shape.

I wonder what the Chicago and NY shows will be like since he's torn a ligament in his foot while dancing in Oakland. Pretty subdued, i'd guess.

As for Gillian, she is indeed out of the band to care for her child who has a serious illness. It was either her or Steve who had to quit and she stepped up and took the challenge. Run Wild was reportedly written about/for Steve and Gillians child, though the ending couplet is out of place in that context.

biznotic, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)

So at Coachella during THE show, noticed a helicopter banking overhead. Thought about how pretty it was and how appropriate, in some way.

Barney noticed it too and pointed it out: "hey look, a helicopter!" The massive videoscreen zoomed in on the copter, then zoomed out until it had the crowd and the stage in frame as well.

Then the band kicked off "Waiting For The Sirens' Call". Just about that time I realized it's the best song on the album. I'm sure that's a coincidence...

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

Speaking of New Order live, what old songs do they still play? I'd love to hear them do "Leave Me Alone." Perhaps I'll just hunt around for some live recordings of it...

BlastsOfStatic (BlastsofStatic), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

Apr 29, 2005 Henry J. Kaiser Arena - Oakland, California (US)

She's Lost Control, Love Vigilantes, Regret, Hey Now What You Doing, Krafty, Transmission, True Faith, Run Wild, Jetstream, Waiting For The Sirens' Call, Bizarre Love Triangle, Love Will Tear Us Apart, Temptation, Crystal, Blue Monday

May 01, 2005 Empire Polo Field - Indio, California (US)

Atmosphere, Waiting For The Sirens' Call, Regret, Transmission, Hey Now What You Doing, Krafty, Jetstream, Bizarre Love Triangle, Love Will Tear Us Apart, Crystal, Blue Monday

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

whoa we got a much better set in oakland, I'm glad!

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)

Well, they also had a couple more opening acts!

At Coachella, they really should have swapped out "Hey Now What You Doing" for "Tempatation".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

I would love it if they added "Age of Consent" to the setlist in NYC.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)

Hi Biznotic. Yeah I looked and didn't see you either. I guess we didn't coordinate very well.

I have been reading a lot of neworderonline forum stuff and heard about the T-shirt prices changing. I suppose they were pricey but I normally expect concert t-shirts to be in the range of 30-35 dollars so it didn't seem at all overpriced at the time. Coachella people just got a lucky bargain. I think the dark green Ceremony one is gorgeous, most beautiful shirt I've ever had.

I've got the version of Run Wild from Oakland. Toying with the idea of whether I want the whole gig or not. Right now I'm collecting more early versions of Everything's Gone Green. Apparently the version on the Umbrellas DVD was the first time they ever performed it!

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

New Order was remarkable tonight, much better than the Coachella set. The best moment was when Barney did the ol' vote for you encore game - "Atmosphere" vs. "Your Silent Face" - then opted to play them both! Opened with "Love Vigilantes," which, along with "YSF," "Run Wild," "True Faith" and "Temptation" comprised the songs not played at Coachella. Among the best I've heard the band, and they were certainly in high spirits. Lots of jokes from Barney, plus rimshots from Stephen. Great crowd, too.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)

*deeply jealous*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

ned, surpringly, no billy corgan!

Peter Hook rules. i can't remember which song it was, but at one point he stood spread legged with his fist raised as the lights were raising up behind him. all i saw was this hulking silhouette at the edge of the stage. my mouth dropped slack at how ridiculously cool it was. also, he took of his shirt not once (at the end of the first set), but twice (throwing a black tour shirt deep into the crowd after the encore)!

john'n'chicago, Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

Grrr....

Baaderonixxxorzh (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

x-post John, I think it was during "True Faith" that Hook struck the pose. He also, if memory served, um, pumped his crotch.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

I love Hooky, but his antics aren't technically "cool".

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha ha. I'm just jealous as hell they did YSF. I remember having a flash of erroneous intuition that they were gonna do that one for the encore in Oakland but no dice. That was the first New Order song I think I ever heard, too. Oh well, maybe a recording of the show will turn up.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

x-post: ah, but the way he embraces the tragically uncool rock-star gesture with such carefree joy makes him cooler than anyone else. or something.

when i got my first meagre pay packet, back in the summer of 1993, i blew the whole thing on a pair of fucking leather trousers. peter hook has a lot to answer for.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

Chicago show on bittorrent.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

if they open w/ Atmosphere in NYC, i believe my head will explode.

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

Okay I've listened to this album constantly for two weeks now I think I've heard enough to decide the good to great songs are:

1. waiting for the sirens call (CLASSIC, best single since Regret)
2. krafty
3. i told you so (I really love this)
4. dracula's castle (this is debateable but I kind of like it)
5. turn (this is a pop masterpiece. but it's almost too slickly produced)
6. guilt is a useless emotion

the other songs I just can't deal with. this makes it the same ratio of good to bad as republic and get ready for me; edging get ready, a bit. the only problem is the songs I dislike on this one I REALLY HATE where as on the other records they're kind of forgettable.

Still, not a bad ratio, album better than people think.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)

Okay, I've gone from liking "Krafty" to ignoring it to REALLY REALLY LOVING it. (Referencing another ILM thread, I still like "Oh My Gosh" more.)

"I Told You So" sounds very, very familiar to me. It's completely fucking awesome; maybe this is the most Electronic-ish song on the album?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 5 May 2005 13:44 (twenty years ago)

One interesting lyric tidbit. In the title track on the record he sings: "Waiting for the sirens' call, I've never seen it here before". However, on Kimmel at least and I think at Coachella, he sings "I've never heard it here before. A correction? Not that it matters to me.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 5 May 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

He's pulling a Morrissey on us. Uh, sorta.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 5 May 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

If anyone's got the Chicago version of Your Silent Face can you help me out? The bittorrent thing doesn't work for everyone because it isn't accepting new accounts.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Thursday, 5 May 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

Great show last night! People pretty much lost their shit during the big hits, especially "Temptation" and "Love Will Tear Us Apart."

Love Vigilantes
Crystal
Regret
Hey Now What You Doing?
Krafty
Transmission
True Faith
Run Wild
Jetstream (with appearance by Ana Matronic)
Waiting For The Siren's Call
Bizarre Love Triangle
Love Will Tear Us Apart
Temptation
--------------------------------------------
She's Lost Control
Atmosphere
Blue Monday

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 6 May 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)

yeah, fantastic show. i thought "transmission" was the strongest of the joy division songs. i kinda felt weird about them playing joy division material going in, but it made perfect sense live. the two bands' songs had never felt so unified to me before.

no real low points in the show to speak of, except that they didn't play "the perfect kiss." but i can deal.

rajeev (rajeev), Friday, 6 May 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

I would have been really happy if they had played "Age of Consent." It's kind of an oddball, but "Run Wild" was a major highlight of the set for me.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 6 May 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

oh "age of consent" would've sent me over the edge.

rajeev (rajeev), Friday, 6 May 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

http://www.neworderonline.com/Photos/Cache/6691.14.large.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 16 May 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)

OMG that is spectacular. Seriously, that's one of the best two or three covers of their career.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:02 (twenty years ago)

Boston Phoenix review.

I don't think I've ever disagreed with a positive review of an album I like more strenuously than I have with this one. Between the "let's completely get the album wrong and pick out the most easily-decipherable song as evidence of New Order's inscrutability" vibe here and the Bruce Springsteen review with a gigantic Trent Reznor coda tacked onto the end of it to make word count that, in its print version, couldn't get the name of the new album right (is it really called The Teeth, Mr Editor?), this was not a good week for the Boston Phoenix music section. (Perhaps if I was a Ben Folds fan I could find the egregious errors in that story, too.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)

An album made with a committee of producers is usually the kind of horseshit you get from Britney Spears or Justin Timberlake. (Don’t kid yourself, that stuff sucks — and I’m throwing Christina Aguilera, the vocal equivalent of Blues Traveler John Popper’s phony harmonica virtuosity, in there too.)

*should I comment? Nah, it's not worth it.*

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)

I was having little fantasies of marching into the Phoenix editorial offices and stealing all of their Shins and Elliot Smith albums as retribution for that little gem.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

wow, that last paragraph is horrible!

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)

does the cd single of jetstream have the richard x rmx?

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)

is the remix better than the album version? because that songs sux

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha. OTM. And that cover is B.L.A.N.D. - will someone please add some salt or butter to those mashed potatoes?

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 06:04 (twenty years ago)

"Jetstream" is the best song on Waiting For The Sirens' Call by a rather large amount.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, I'm not sure I would go that far (that would probably be "Turn" or "I told you so"), but it's true that "Jetstream" is the song I keep coming back to.
I have a special place in my heart for that sexy "get ready for takeoff"-type intro, which comes out great on the Richard X remix (which otherwise doesn't add that much to the song).

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:25 (twenty years ago)

I didn't like it at first, but it was quite good on T4 Popworld. I was quite taken with the idea of playing keyboards whilst clutching a plectrum. I suppose it is normal, but there we are.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I wouldn't say absolute best but offhand I'd place it, the title track, "Krafty" and "Guilt is a Useless Emotion" in a four-way tie at the top.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 12:03 (twenty years ago)

I really don't understand why people are praising "Turn", seeing as it's the most faceless, generic, personality-free song on the album. It souds like a sterile version of "All The Way" to me.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

*GASP*

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

Motherfuckers clearly did not read my story upthread: NO and I had a moment with that title track. It reigns o'er the album, king of kings, alpha and omega, amen.

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)

Whoever referred to "Turn" as "the new 'Dream Attack'" somewhere upthread was OTM. Understated, modest, reflective album closer ahoy. If there's an equivalent to "All the Way" on WFTSC, it's "Krafty" -- bright, optimistic, Barney's guitar at the forefront of the track, etc.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

But "Dream Attack" was really, really fantastic! "Turn" is aural saccharine, plus if you listen to the arrangement the biggest difference between "Turn" and "All The Way" is that there isn't an incontinent synthesizer wanking all over the post-chorus bridge of "Turn" (which admittedly is a point in its favor).

Also, it's followed on the US album by "Working Overtime" so it's just not an album closer here.

(hahaha although the synth in the actual bridge-bridge is perilously close to the "All The Way" synth patch)

Another song on this album that's been sneaking up on me is "Morning Night And Day".

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

x-post: i agree that turn is much more like dream attack than like all the way. most good new order songs are aural saccharine btw.

It souds like a sterile version of "All The Way" to me.
turn sounds like all the way with a soul and heart and tune. i wonder what those words mean in your vocabulary, dan: faceless, generic, personality-free and sterile. they don't make the slightest sense whatever concerning turn. not in my world of music and language anyways.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

Also, it's followed on the US album by "Working Overtime" so it's just not an album closer here.

That "new 'Dream Attack'" meme from upthread has stuck with me so much that I sometimes (often?) forget that "Turn" isn't the album closer!

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

YSI: Annoyingly jerky low-quality video of 46 seconds of "Transmission" from Coachella... Enjoy!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)

"Turn" is, in essence, a distillation of the common tonalities of the first four songs on the album lumped together in an uninspired, unmemorable melange of blandness. The only thing that sticks out about "Turn" is the fact that the chorus sounds it was stolen from a completely different but equally boring and unremarkable song because the verses were so soul-suckingly unmemorable the band couldn't be bothered to try to write something that made melodic sense with the verses (ie it is possibly the clumsiest transition from a minor key to its relative major key that I've heard in a while, especially since the major chord progression is the oh-so-thrilling-and-not-overused-at-all I-V-ii-IV).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

I wonder if I ever need to learn anything more about "music" because "Turn" is easily my second favorite song on the album.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

Actually the bridge to "Turn" is really nice and a lot of the guitar is great, too; I think it suffers more from album position than anything else because by the time you hit it in the sequence you've already heard four songs that inhabit almost the exact same sonic space with better chord progressions, plus two songs that are similar enough sonically to start firing off "THIS IS OLD HAT NOW" alarms. Had the song come earlier on the album, like perhaps where "Krafty" is, it would probably come across much better (and "Krafty" itself wouldn't suffer from being placed later on the album because it ws the lead single and people are already familiar with/know what to expect from it).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

Barney on the Lindsay Lohan diet???
http://www.popworld.com/repository/1960582.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

http://www.popworld.com/repository/1960586.jpg

http://www.popworld.com/repository/1960588.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

i'm still listening, but so far my belief is that the first four songs on the album constitute a flawless, beautiful new order EP. and i still hate working overtime. i did a 180 on krafty though, so let's press on.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)

(I forgot to mention that the chord progression on the chorus of "Turn" is the same chord progression used on "All The Way" in my earlier rant.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

Yikes. I think we need a poll thread for fave tracks on this album.

Nice pics Spencer!!

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

Actually, Dan, I think the only flaw of "Turn" is that it comes too early in the album (i.e. it should have been the album closer). I immediately thought of Dream Attack when hearing this partly because of the similar sound but also because the two songs definitely share a wistful "after winter must come spring" vibe, a feeling of turning the page of something anew. That's something I get from many NO songs and what I love most about this band. It's also the type of note I like to leave an album on.

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 06:38 (twenty years ago)

a wistful "after winter must come spring" vibe
well said. the title is quite otm then. and yes turn would have been the closer in a better world. but working overtime isn't really the closer. just read the title. it's a bonus after the main shift. and an unexpected and quite funny way to end this great new new order album. 2nd best after movement, i haven't changed my mind.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

Have you guys actually listened to Technique recently?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

I have actually and I thought that maybe, just maybe, WFTSC was a finer album. No need to choose, though.

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

http://w2.isohunt.com/torrents.php?ihq=Waiting+For+The+Sirens%27+&ext=&op=and&nr

siren, Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

That wasn't my point. My point was that "Turn" doesn't sound anything like "Dream Attack"; if I was going to compare "Turn" to something off of Technique, it would either be "All The Way" for the reasons I've already listed (ie, the same chord progression done with similar instrumental arrangements). "Dream Attack" is a synth-heavy legatofest of sustained phrases built on a simple i-VI progression with and added VII in the chorus for variety. "Dream Attack" doesn't switch tonality between relative minor and major keys when going from its verse to its chorus. "Dream Attack" isn't carried by acoustic rhythm guitar. I could go on and on (and some will say I already have).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

I should listen to the two albums back to back.

WTF is with Peter's pose in the second picture, BTW?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

I hear you Dan. I guess it's more the propulsive yet longing feeling of 'Turn' that made me think of 'Dream Attack'.

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

Peter AKA Hooky was interviewed as well on that programme. Sadly I only caught the very end.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

i'll add another to the "jetstream is rubbish". worst NO single ever. worse than spooky, or whatever that Regret single nobody can remember was

ja (_ja_), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)

Funny, I imagined Ana Matronic to look completely different (i.e like an electroclashy sourpuss)

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

Have you guys actually listened to Technique recently?
positive, dan. just today as i am about to choose my favourite album from 1989. and it won't be technique for sure. the first four songs pale in comparison with the first three of the new one. in the second half though technique gains a little but not too much compared to ...sirens' call. i have never been a big fan of the dance pop combo new order though, i must admit.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

Dan's last post sounds like that English critic hearing Aeolian cadences in the Beatles' "It Won't Be Long."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

was that ian macdonald by any chance, alfred? too lazy to look it up in his beatles book.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

Awesome!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

technically you are probably right dan, but on an emotional level turn and dream attack seem to have some common points. for a start they both have a gorgeous melancholic tune. the rhythm component is not predominating like on many other songs on technique. and baaderonixx is write they both express a yearning. and move forward at the same time. dream attack is a perfect closer.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

write = right, omg.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Dan, I think the point is that you may home in on specifics of tonalities, but others might think 'it *feels* like Dream Attack, or 'the guitar is sort of the same'. No-one is wrong if that's what you hear.

For me Turn is an interesting one - I like the way that the obviousness of the chord changes are coupled with a certain restraint on the chorus. There's a slightly reluctant feel to the guitar and it sort of drops out at the end of some lines (I'll have to re-listen to say exactly which ones) where you would expect it to continue. The vocal is quite un-Barney like too.

I still really, really love WFTSC and the chances are that this won't change now. AND....there's a follow-up in the can apparently!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

Yes, the fact that none of the singles include b-sides makes me think that they're keeping the extra tunes for a quick follow-up. Life can be sweet...

Baaderonixx (it must be a camel) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

Did no one download that little clip I put up???

Also, Ana Matronic is quite the chameleon, she looks completely different in the "Jetstream" video. Her verse in that track is so great.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

The Richard X mix of "Jetstream" is *great*, still very New Order.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

WTF is with Peter's pose in the second picture, BTW?

Yeah, I was going to say. It looks like he's aiming his bass at some target in the sky as though he's going to throw it like a paper airplane.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Saturday, 21 May 2005 04:23 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
Hurrah! A DVD-quality version of The Perfect Kiss video will soon be mine!

carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 July 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

THIS IS HUGE NEWS (but next autumn??? I hope that means 2005...)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

FINALLY!!!!!!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

From worldinmotion.net:

Between the soundcheck and the concert, I sat down with New Order management (Andrew Robinson and Rebecca Boulton) to talk about what will be happening in a close future for New Order.

* As expected "Waiting for the siren's call" is the next single, expect a release date early August 2005.
* Rhino will be releasing a DVD compilation of all New Order videos, expect two new video from old songs (Ceremony and Temptation) directed by Michael Shamberg. Expect a release date mid September 2005. Sleeve will be done as always by Peter Saville.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!YAY

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

No one else is excited? What is wrong with you people?!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

I'm excited!

carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 1 July 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

Pro: YAY NEW ORDER VIDEOS!
Con: "The Perfect Kiss" video is mind-bogglingly boring and really badly sung.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)

what the hell does Crystal (GIna Birch version) mean?

MIchael Shamberg ran Ikon, Factory's VHS arm, no? I'm rusty on my Factory trivia. I think he may be married to Miranda Stanton/Stanton Miranda of Thick Pigeon now, or they were at a show together or something like that. /useless trivia.

Dan Perry, you are on crack. The Perfect Kiss video is an absolute joy to behold, and I can watch it over and over again. I fetishize every moment, from Peter putting the pict in his mouth to play the synth-drums to the bandmembers all looking to each other as the song ends, every object, from the Joy Division poster on the wall to the gear, OH THE GEAR! Gillian starting things off with a Octave Plateu Voyetra 8, the Emulator Frog preset. One of the best videos ever.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

You've got to be kidding.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)

i've already got all the vids on DVD, including every thing from the first FAC Vid through Jetstream. All the IKON vids were compiled on a 2DVD set...bootleg but good quality with excellent menu's. excited? not really, since the overwhelming majority of their vids suck. the only 2 of interest are Ceremony and Temptation.

agree that Dan Perry is smoking crack. Perfect Kiss is probably the best New ORder video. If you don't like that one, this DVD set is of no value to you at all. Pick up the US double disc version of International for the 5 track DVD on disc 2.

biz, Friday, 1 July 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

HAhahaha um I feel like I've stumbled onto the set of "Land Of The Dead".

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

Carson, thanks for the news!

These statements suggest crack-smoking:
the overwhelming majority of their vids suck.
"The Perfect Kiss" video is mind-bogglingly boring and really badly sung.

Here's the tracklisting!

Confusion
The Perfect Kiss
Shellshock
State of the Nation
Bizarre Love Triangle
True Faith
Touched By The Hand Of God
Blue Monday ‘88
Fine Time
Round & Round
Run
World In Motion
Regret
Ruined In A Day
World
Spooky
1963
Crystal
60 Miles An Hour
Here To Stay
Krafty
Jetstream
Waiting For The Sirens’ Call

Extras:
Round & Round – USA/Patty
Regret – Baywatch
Crystal – Gina Birch version

Live:
Temptation (from 3.16)

New:
Ceremony (dir. by Yu Likwai)
Temptation (dir. by Michael H. Shamberg)

YAY, I LOVE SO MANY OF THESE THEY ARE SO CLASSIC!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

My favorites:

Bizarre Love Triangle
Confusion
The Perfect Kiss
Touched...
Blue Monday ‘88
Fine Time
Round & Round
Run
Regret
World

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Dan Perry, what are you talking about?!?!?! The Perfect Kiss is a classic video beloved by millions. Don't make out like I'm the crazy one!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

"The Perfect Kiss" was always the video I skipped on the "Substance" tape! It's static and dull and egregiously out of tune!

("Substance" was all about the videos from "Shellshock" onwards IMO.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

Now you're knocking the video for Confusion! I can't even believe it.

TS: the goofy pre Fine Young Cannibals video for True Faith with weirdos bouncing around in funny suits or Jonathan Demme's classic footage of a live performance of The Perfect Kiss performed in a studio, catching the very essence of New Order?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

and Google tells me that the "Gina Birch" version of Crystal is actually a Digweed version, with the video directed by Gina Birch. Not as exciting as the idea of Gina Birch (of the Raincoats and Red Krayola) playing with New Order. Wonder if it's the same Gina Birch after all.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

The "Perfect Kiss" video is mesmerizing and sounds perfectly "in tune" to me.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:13 (twenty years ago)

Now you're knocking the video for Confusion!

No I'm not! Not intentionally, anyway. I was actually going to explicitly call out the video for "Confusion" as being fantastic but got lazy.

That "True Faith" video is one of my favorite videos of all time.

The "Perfect Kiss" video is mesmerizing and sounds perfectly "in tune" to me.

Oh man. Um. That's simultaneously fortunate and unfortunate (because that is seriously one of the worst vocals I've ever heard from Mr. Sumner and I would love to be able to ignore how teeth-grindingly awful it is).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

Dan Perry shockingly on point.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

Maybe we're talking about a different version? I love it and I love the performance - especially the vocal (and the extra cowbell).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

I'm talking about the version on "Substance" which appears to be a taped live performance with lots of staid camera angles all over the band and their gear which features Bernard Sumner gasping his way through the lyrics with a piercing, out of tune strangulated yelp that's almost a caricature of every negative thing detractors say about his voice. His singing is so painfully awful that it completely ruins the entire song.

The extra cowbel is cool, I will grant you that.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

I've noticed his voice to be out of tune. Never bothered me though. I imagine being in a studio and recording it was difficult to monitor, for what it's worth.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

Dan, I think your trained ear for "in tune" vocals actually inhibits your enjoyment of certain acts/tracks!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

The video itself is shot beautifully - Like Dan S. said, it's New Order absolutely in their element. I can watch it over and over. It's second only to "Bizarre Love Triangle" for me.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

I have only become a New Order fan in the last few years. I do not believe I have seen any of their videos. I shall purchase this DVD compilation of New Order videos, and consume them slowly but regularly, perhaps one or two a day. When I am finished, I shall return to this thread and pass judgement on New Order's music video oeuvre.

Lukas (lukas), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

you will also need to buy Taras Shevchenko.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

Guys, guys, SEPARATE THREAD. I was seriously wondering why there was a lot of talk all of a sudden on Waiting. ;-)

Anyway, echoing all the YAY news above, of course.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 1 July 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

Dan, I think your trained ear for "in tune" vocals actually inhibits your enjoyment of certain acts/tracks!

I think I said something along those lines upthread, Spencer.

Of course, the flipside is that if people knew more about music, they wouldn't let musicians get away with sucking.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 2 July 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)

Ignorance in this case truly is bliss!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)

Well, the DVD's got World In Motion, that's all I care about. I saw that video once and every time I hear the song now I see that video in my mind (the song is one of my favourites and I play it regularly) and it reminds me of the football field in Salford I used to walk by on my way home in 1991. And Gillian is great in it, too.

And...wait...there's a Ceremony video? **nervous that it might suck and ruin the song entirely don't want to see it ever incase it does**

Hey it doesn't have Touched By The Hand of God!!!!! CURSE THEM!!!
OH wait...it does. Fabulous.

Confusion is so dated. You're better off with the original 12" than seeing that video.

The Perfect Kiss video is great, awkward but great. That's all I have to say but...

"Waiting For The Sirens Call" has a video?
Oh yeah wait they said that was gonna be the next single in August. But you know they won't part with any juicy B-sides for another year. Even though they have them up their sleeves. Jesus Christ was born in a manger.

Anyway, it's a DVD, and that's just grand for now. I NEED TO HAVE THE WORLD IN MOTION VIDEO ON DVD. THIS IS THE MAIN POINT.

Weasels & Chipmunks Ahoy! (Bimble...), Saturday, 2 July 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

Confusion is dated? Footage of Arthur Baker and Jellybean Benitez in the Fun House. Arthur bringing the reel, and the band, from the studio for Jellybean to preview it, while pizza parlor girls from queens dance and rocksteady crew battles. Most people I know spend a great deal of time trying to create 1/10th the vibe of such a scenario, and I'd trade every club in NYC right now for The Funhouse(and Paradise Garage, shown briefly) as seen in that video.

If people knew more about music, perhaps instead of trusting their gut and visceral response and not questioning their enjoyment, or dislike, they'd sit around and talk it to death to the point of no longer paying attention to the music itself. Wait a minute...

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 2 July 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the "Confusion" video is "dated" in the best way possible - the shot of the WTC during Baker's cab ride is amazing.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 08:34 (twenty years ago)

If people knew more about music, perhaps instead of trusting their gut and visceral response and not questioning their enjoyment, or dislike, they'd sit around and talk it to death to the point of no longer paying attention to the music itself. Wait a minute...

Seeing as most of the people here don't know anything about music and DO THAT ANYWAY, you don't seem to have a point here.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 2 July 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)

My point is it seems pretty ridiculous to say that if only Spencer was more educated, he'd realize how bad that version of that song he really likes is. Sure ILX, and the world, are filled with people who don't know anything about anything but act like they do, but it's unfair to dismiss those who don't claim any sort of expertise while making aesthethic judgements, especially when the judgement is simply "I like this" or "I don't like that", as opposed to "this is objectively good" of "bad".

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 2 July 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

dan perry, you are a man of taste and distinction. but in this instance you're just wrong. the perfect kiss video is ... perfect.

the oracle has spoken (grimlord), Saturday, 2 July 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

You know it's not like I'm deaf or anything. I can tell when something is really out of tune. I sing and play a number of instruments and I know when I'm not hitting a note. I just really like Barney's performance.

that's almost a caricature of every negative thing detractors say about his voice.

I do understand that there's an exaggerated quality to his voice in the video, but I'd say it spotlights what's really wonderful about Barney - the unstudied child-like earnestness.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 2 July 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

From billboard.com via worldinmotion.net:

New Order has rounded up 22 music videos and a 1993 documentary for the upcoming DVD "Item," due Sept. 13 via Warner Music. According to a spokesperson, one disc of the package includes clips for such classic tracks as "Blue Monday," "True Faith," "Bizarre Love Triangle," "The Perfect Kiss" and "Regret," as well as two newly shot videos for "Ceremony" and "Temptation."

The other disc will house the documentary "New Order Story," which chronicles the group transformation from Joy Division into worldwide dance/rock superstars. The film was previously released on VHS but has been expanded here to twice its original 70-minute length.

*eyes roll into back of head*

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

And on September 5th:

http://www.neworderonline.com/Photos/Cache/6886.14.large.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

Someone on the neworderonline messageboard suggested a better title for the DVD: Motion.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)

No word yet on b-sides/remixes for "Waiting for the Sirens' Call."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)

Years ago I bought the long "Neworderstory" in Canada - 2 1/2 hours! I can't imagine how that was chopped down to 60 minutes for the U.S. version.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)

Bump. Where my NOggaz at??

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)

awesome news on the DVD but seriously fuck anything related to the last album. We really need a new New Order thread that isn't cluttered with all this Siren business.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

Why? It's very good, you know.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

Some people don't know that, actually.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Also some people are borderline retarded.

The Ghost of What Were You Expecting When You Clicked On This Thread??? (Dan Per, Friday, 15 July 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

when will Here Are the YOung Men get an official DVD release?

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

An excellent question, but I wonder how much better it can look (over VHS).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Also some people are borderline retarded.

-- The Ghost of What Were You Expecting When You Clicked On This Thread???

New Order-related news that didn't necessarily have to do with this album, which is what I got, tough guy.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

Gentlemen, Gentlemen!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

sorry.

I'm really starting to salivate at the thought of that DVD, though.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

I am going to watch it so many times.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

New Order DVD News

The Ghost of Hello? (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

(ps: My username there is a referential joke and not a dig at anyone.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 15 July 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
from neworderonline.com

According to Warner Music Germany, New Order is expected to release new 7" singles on September 26th.

The following tracklistings have been revealed:

A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Rich Costi Remix)
A. Temptation (Secret Machines Remix)

A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Band Mix)
B. Everything's Gone Green (Timo Maas Remix)

A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (JKL Remix)
B. Bizarre Love Triangle (Richard X Remix)

And there is also a 12" (to be confirmed) featuring:

A. Waiting For The Sirens' Call (Planet Funk Remix)
B. Blue Monday

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

How utterly uninteresting. I won't be looking for these immediately and listening to them with great anticipation.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Uh... "Bizarre Love Triangle (Richard X remix)" uninteresting???? That's crazy talk.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

And a New Order self-remix of the title track!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Spencer Spencer SPENCER. How long have you known me? Did I not give enough clues in my response that maybe I am saying the opposite of what I said? ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

OH!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

I can be quite humorless before lunch!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

"Everything's Gone Green (Timo Maas Remix)" ???!!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Ah, you are forgiven. I'm getting quite hungry myself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

B. Everything's Gone Green (Timo Maas Remix)!!!

xpost

Baaderonixx on a long black leash (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

I love how the 12" just throws on "Blue Monday."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
http://www.neworderonline.com/Photos/Cache/6954.14.large.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)

What the hell? Okay I'm guessing that's not a Saville design. Am I wrong? Is it a stab at a Roxy Music sleeve? WtF?

The Spiderwebbed Wilderness (Bimble...), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:37 (twenty years ago)

that's the original sleeve design by Saville Associates, preferred by Saville for the album but turned down by the label due to Tsunami Tsensitivity.

biz, Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)

It's very very Saville.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)

Also, remember that Saville did several Roxy Music covers (although I don't think he's specifically referencing that here).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

The current official line is that this will be released only as three 7" vinyl singles!

I want them to release a full CD5 here, in a regular jewel case. That way I can take the single cover and occasionally put it in my full album jewel case.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 3 September 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)

there is a few hotties in the round and round video so i'll buy dvd.

10ftwall, Saturday, 3 September 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)

what version of temptation is on that?

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 3 September 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
A remix by Secret Machines.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 23 September 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

For anybody in the UK who sent off for one of the free slipcases Warner is doing for the 7" release of Waiting For The Sirens' Call - beware, they're sending them out in thin envelopes, so they can can get very easily :(

carson dial (carson dial), Saturday, 24 September 2005 12:54 (twenty years ago)

"Morning Night and Day" is waiting for a remix that will take it heavenward.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 24 September 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)

six months pass...
I finally bothered to investigate this after feeling obliged to by discussion elsewhere. I really like W4TSC and am warming to Krafty. Not sure about Jetstream yet. How are people feeling about the album a year later? Do I need anything besides the singles?

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

yes, in fact, i think this is the most complete listening album shy of Technique. The album actually sounds like a coherent album with the exception of the last track. it's easy to get used so i'd spend 8 bucks and buy it. hey joe, morning night and day etc. the whole album is better than Krafty and Jetstream, which are the popiest, poopiest tracks on the album.

biz, Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

Is it really a year later?

If so, I am frightened.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 April 2006 06:42 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah I've been thinking about this. There is something on the horizon.

honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 April 2006 04:51 (nineteen years ago)

Still feel the same - absolute classic - maybe their second best album, after Movement. Biz is OTM - it does feel like a coherent album.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Saturday, 22 April 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)

i really haven't listened to it very much. actually, i've not listened to much new order at all in the past few months. i think i'm maybe scared to go back in case i like it even less ... IIRC it was starting to grow on me slightly.

i should read back through this thread and find out.

i'll listen to it this week.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 April 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

i should read back through this thread and find out.

wow. what a rollercoaster ride of emotions i was on. i'm looking forward to listening to it again now.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 22 April 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

No. The point is they're supposed to have an album 80-90% in the can already for this summer. So we're supposed to hold our breath for moment of silence.

I will say this though...upon going on a walk in the sunshine today with Disc 1 of Substance...

In history they will write about the most timeless bands, Led Zeppelin, The Beatles...but when it comes to the dancefloors alone, New Order reign. Even if that means enduring Blue Monday for the 5 billionth time after I swore I couldn't stand to hear it again.

honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 22 April 2006 23:01 (nineteen years ago)

I only like Substance now. I should get rid of the others.

The album with Crystal on it is now £1.97 in Music Zone.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)

I lost my CD of this but fortunately had put it on my iPod beforehand; I still listen to "Morning Night And Day" and "Jetstream" a lot.

Dan (J-E-T) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)

Dan J-E-T, you are NO good to me. (nb, with that one song exempted, i still like this album, some songs quite a lot)

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:42 (nineteen years ago)

Hahahahaha

Dan (*Sob*) Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

i listened again. the title track is beautiful. "working overtime" is glorious; i know that puts me in a minority, but i love it. the rest is average new order, and as i've said before ... :(

drunkenly, i listened to "age of consent" walking down the street at midnight last night. they don't really NEED to do anything else. they wrote that. that's good enough for me.

there is a case, which i might one day make, that it is their finest song of all.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 29 April 2006 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

That's right grimly. When you die, at the pearly gates, they'll corner you. And they will demand a 6 page essay about Age of Consent. Hahahahaha. Sorry - not laughing AT you of course, but WITH you. You understand.

honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 29 April 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)

;)

honorary joy division roadie (Bimble...), Saturday, 29 April 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

The guitar tones on this album are magnificent. They make the album alone. So warm and yet nostalgic.

baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6923972.stm

"You are no more New Order than I am!"

Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:36 (eighteen years ago)

This album sounds even better now that when it came out. Maybe because it's such a summery album. I'm inclined to say it tops even 'Technique'.

baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

Hold on.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

No, it's too late now, sorry Ned.

baaderonixx, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

this record totally fell under the radar for me. haven't heard it yet, and don't envisage hearing it anytime soon

Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

Fopp had them for £3 back when they wus OPEN.

Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I bought it again!

Hook's myspace statement on shenanigans is crazy...

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=180575671&blogID=292670868

"dont assume you have the rights to do anything NEW ordery"

Hmmm...new ordery....

Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

It's all about being sober he says, elsewhere.

Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

Christ, that sub-literate Hooky myspace thing is proof positive that rock stars should never, ever blog. Talk about fatally diminishing your own legacy.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)

Hahahahahaha this is hilarious! And sad.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)

Does that mean we'll get a new Electronic album?

Eintrag von Garry von 27 Jul 2007, 14:44


PeterHook

If your not bloody careful! although if you want a bargain i believe the BEST OF is goin for 2 quid in the shetland islands! glad i didnt do a revenge one!

Eintrag von PeterHook von 30 Jul 2007, 18:01

Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

But he DID rerelease the Revenge stuff on LTM...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

He did a revenge *several* !

Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

The "Gun World Porn" EP is good, though.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

YES. I own that on cassette – the best thing they ever did.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

brrr. hooky's blog ain't working, for some kind of server-error-style reason. i think this is a good thing. i read something he'd written before, and it was pure arse.

it's a shame, all this, but hey. new order haven't been new order since gillian left -- i mean, that was the whole point of changing the name after joy division, etc ... that it was more than the sum of its parts, etc, and they wouldn't try to keep the band going in the same way without a core member.

way to defile a legacy, though. cocks.

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

They'll ask Andy Rourke to join, the bastards.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

Bringing back Gillian and doing one of those "playing the whole album" tours would be a great career move at this point. The question is which album.

everything, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)

They could have a crack at Tigermilk maybe?

Mark G, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)

At this point I'd rather have a new Other Two album anyway.

leavethecapital, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 06:16 (eighteen years ago)

The question is which album

the answer is "movement". that would fix 'em good.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 07:44 (eighteen years ago)

They could have a crack at Tigermilk maybe?

well, Electronic Renaissance is basically Procession....

Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:01 (eighteen years ago)

The answer is 'Substance'

baaderonixx, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)

then they would have to do Confusion live....have they ever done that?

Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)

er, yeh? i've got a video of it somewhere. at least one.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:30 (eighteen years ago)

looks a bit like this.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 10:31 (eighteen years ago)

Peter Hook was ugly anyway. Next.

(j/k pete, u know it's love)

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 1 August 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)

the cover version of 'turn' from the new order fan 'community2' cd is excellent, btw (by someone called glast nost? beats me).

http://www.myspace.com/neworderonline

akm, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:33 (eighteen years ago)

It's nice but I can't help thinking it totally reveals the "Hallmark ad" core of taht song.

baaderonixx, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:26 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

i'm reviving this one 'cos it seems to be the closest we've got to a contemporary rolling new order thread ... anyway, was in borders the other day picking up some new books and spotted the words "BERNARD SUMNER" looming down at me from a high shelf in the "independent publishers" section.

turns out it's a 216pp unauthorised biography by some dude called david nolan. cost me 13 quid ... just started reading it this morning and it's quite fascinating so far. the USP is that nolan gave barney the manuscript to read and has printed his notes verbatim -- so barney crops up every few pars with a "hmm" or "no, it was more like this ..." or some other such gnomic pearl. turns out it's also reviewed in the october "word" (yes, i know; i quite like it, and it's got collins and maconie in it, so fuck off) ... as the reviewer said, the barney comments are so good you do rather wish he'd written the whole thing. but, given that was never going to happen, this is a more-than-adequate substitute.

more once i've finished it. maybe.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)

Interesting - strange fellow, Barney.

Anyway, they're getting back together again for an AHW memorial gig. There's a Manchester Evening News link somewhere if I can find it. I just hope it doesn't become a 'New Order final gig' thing.

Dr.C, Monday, 17 September 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

bound to, though, innit?

am about halfway through the barney book: it's astonishingly sloppy in places (pars where every other word is mis-spelt) but rattles along at a fair old place and spends enough time being absolutely fascinating to make it 13 quid well spent. much of the narrative is driven by (erstwhile NO road manager) terry mason -- and some of barney's comments about his reminiscences are priceless (eg "terry? a dreamer like ian curtis? that's so wrong ... leave it in").

nolan's writing's nowhere near as good as he thinks -- there are a few awkward attempts at imposing a "style" that fall flat and are promptly forgotten about -- but his research and thirst for detail are admirable. i've had a flick through to the end and it deals with the hooky/myspace fallout -- there even seem to be some barney comments about it. not gonna spoil it for myself just yet, though :)

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 11:40 (eighteen years ago)

(and dr C: if you could post a link to the gig news, that'd be great. i'm stuck in an island farmhouse on dial-up and google is not my friend.)

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 11:42 (eighteen years ago)

Here's the article. BUT there's another flippin' Hooky announcement since then, which is below.

Manchester Evening News Article

Dianne Bourne
11/ 9/2007

NO sooner have the original band members of New Order gone their separate ways than rumours surface that the group may be reunited - for a one-off tribute to the late, great Factory Records boss Tony Wilson.

The legendary Manc band split earlier this year after bass player Peter Hook announced he was no longer working with singer Bernard Sumner and drummer Stephen Morris.

But Peter has now revealed that he has discussed the possibility of reforming the band for a one-off tribute to Tony - the man who first signed the band to his Factory label in their former incarnation, Joy Division.

Hooky told the M.E.N: "It's very typical New Order to split up and then get back together again just like that isn't it?

"The idea has been mooted by Oliver (Tony Wilson's son) - that was when it was talked about.

"And the thing is, for Tony, I'd do anything.

"So, I'm not ruling anything out - I never do really."

Since the death of `Mr Manchester' last month, there has been much talk about what will be the most fitting tribute to music mogul and broadcaster Tony, with suggestions including a huge memorial concert.

And Hooky says he doesn't think any tribute could be too big for a man so influential in his own, and Manchester's, life.

He tells me: "What I'd like is a huge statue of Tony, stood there, legs akimbo, on Princess Parkway, with `Welcome To My Manchester' on the top of his head - that's what I'd like.

"I don't personally think, for someone who was as important to me as Tony was, that any kind of tribute is too big - particularly when you think how much he gave to this city."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Hook's Blog Entry

Can I just clear up this Manchester Evening News Article. In a conversation with Oliver Wilson about a tribute gig for his father, he asked me what the chances were of getting New Order to perform. I said, "Seeing as we have just split up, pretty slim.", he then said to me "If I could get the others to agree, would you do it?", I said "In honour of your father, I'd do anything."

This means I would sell the popcorn, take the tickets, sweep up after, play bass in New Order/Joy Division/Crawling Chaos.

I do wish that people would read things properly before mouthing off. I am definately going to have to learn to keep my big fat mouth shut (but I blame the bloody press!). And as Tony would say "Fuck em!"

Dr.C, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

i saw that and it's not clear to me that this is actually happening...I think he was just saying he would, not that they were.

akm, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:11 (eighteen years ago)

that 'hey now, what u doin' song recently used on advert is teh suck

blueski, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

they should have used "everything's gone green"

Mark G, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)

what's teh suck - the ad or the song?

The song is great btw.

What's the ad for? - I've seen it, but can't remember.

Dr.C, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

finished the barney book. hmm. it goes downhill quickly. basically, the dude found out a couple of interesting facts about his childhood (his mother was seriously physically disabled with MS and his birth name really is sumner) and got some amusing anecdotes from terry mason about the JD days. once mason disappears from the scene, it becomes yet another sketchy dash through the slow decline of new order, punctuated by occasional shafts of barney wit. worth reading -- especially the first half -- but i'm revising my opinion about it being worth 13 quid ;)

still: the author rates "republic" above "get ready" and "WFTSC", so he's obviously got some sense ;)

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

Who Doesn't?

Mark G, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)

I sure don't.

baaderonixx, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

But is that book worth £7?

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

yes! absolutely. buy it.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's hilarious that Hooky said he'd play bass in Crawling Chaos for Tony.

I saw this Bernard book on Amazon before but something just didn't make me jump to get it for some reason. Maybe in time I will feel differently, but frankly all I've done for the last year and a half is read music books, many of them Manchester-related and after the Hannett one it was like "well...what the hell could go any further than that?" I couldn't imagine trying to follow that one with anything remotely related, at least for a good while. I'm through with music books for awhile. I'm just not sure I want to know every detail of Bernard's life, either, but I may well reconsider after a few years. I am glad you at least thought it was half good, grimly. That's at least better than I might have expected.

Bimble, Friday, 21 September 2007 04:03 (eighteen years ago)

still: the author rates "republic" above "get ready" and "WFTSC", so he's obviously got some sense ;)

-- grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:28 (2 days ago) Link

SINGLES ONLY:
Republic > Waiting for the Sirens' Call > Get Ready

ENTIRE ALBUMS:
Waiting for the Sirens' Call > Get Ready > Republic

stephen, Friday, 21 September 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)

Just read the Bernard Sumner book. Not a great work of art of anything but the kind of fanzine-y tone was very enjoyable. Had some stuff I didn't know (Barney is a yachtsman!) and interviews some people Who Were There which is always nice (except when he then relies on those same people for comment when They Weren't There i.e. the aforementioned Terry Mason). It'll have to do until the as yet unwritten Steven Morris autobiography comes out.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

Also hadn't known bout Barney's Angels until reading this book.
http://www.barneysangels.com/
Ahhh...

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:02 (eighteen years ago)

And associated (and rather lovely) flickr group...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/barneysangels/

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:03 (eighteen years ago)

I like that flickr stuff. I can't believe I actually remember that blue picture of him in Record Mirror. That Barney's Angels site is pretty cool, too.

It'll have to do until the as yet unwritten Steven Morris autobiography comes

Ha! If there was a Stephen Morris book out, I'd grab that right away. ;)

Bimble, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

Why the hell is there a Japanese version of "Krafty"??
http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/11/3/344326/NewOrder-Krafty%28Japanese%20Version%29.mp3

baaderonixx, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

Because it's great? I was slightly suspicious of the lyrics though because they sounded a bit like made up Japanese. Apparently they were done by Masafumi Goto of Asian Kung Fu Generation so presumably they're right.

Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:42 (eighteen years ago)

.. or they're really funny.

Mark G, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:45 (eighteen years ago)

this makes me cry. and not in a good way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PClE6Uhml4M

:-(

stephen, Friday, 12 October 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

because it's rubbish?

i blame even as we speak for giving them the idea, their version isn't much better

electricsound, Friday, 12 October 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)

And Frente. What is it with Australian bands doing twee versions of that song?

Ned Trifle II, Friday, 12 October 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)

Who cares about crappy New Order cover versions??

Sunrise, Live at the Hacienda, 1985:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVP0qpJNH-0

Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 06:57 (eighteen years ago)

Or better yet, This Time of Night, live 1985:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9OCB69KwpU

Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 06:59 (eighteen years ago)

Hurt, live 1984, shirtless Barney:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRu5CThEmcE

Bimble, Monday, 15 October 2007 07:04 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

"Morning Night and Day" is waiting for a remix that will take it heavenward.

I'm still waiting on this

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 22 August 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

what happened to all these other songs from that session (don't tell me they ended up on the Bad Lieutenant thingy)

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Monday, 23 August 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)

one year passes...

I'm not sure anyone else but me cares at this point but...
Peter Hook: New Order to release 7 songs from ‘Waiting for the Sirens’ Call’ sessions

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 14:36 (fourteen years ago)

Hope they include some of the Xenomania stuff.

daavid, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

seven months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ynkz5EfIirs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5LX16zia2k

note the similarity in the intros

an independent online phenomenon (DJP), Wednesday, 18 April 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)

Time for a mashup

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 April 2012 15:31 (thirteen years ago)

nine months pass...

seems like not many people wanna talk about Lost Sirens - I know most of it is pretty average but I realize that MOR New Order has become my classic rock - could listen on repeat to middle-aged balearic stuff like "Recoil"

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 22 January 2013 14:40 (thirteen years ago)

In at number 23.

Not bad for being hard-to-find in shops (whatever shops are left, etc)

Mark G, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 15:40 (thirteen years ago)

five months pass...

New Order 80 min CDr 'Best Of'

Seeing New Order in Austin TX tonight (first date on a short tour) and made this 'best of' to coincide with the show. Took their most recent setlist (last month), took out some of the old Joy Division-esque stuff (and JD "covers") and replaced it with stuff I prefer-- a couple tunes from Technique, "Touched by the Hand of God," and "Love Vigilantes."

Total running time: 1:19:39

01 Elegia
02 Crystal
03 Regret
04 I'll Stay with You (lead track on Lost Sirens)
05 Fine Time
06 Age of Consent
07 Love Vigilantes
08 Here to Stay (non-album track from International)
09 Your Silent Face
10 World
11 Bizarre Love Triangle
12 True Faith
13 Touched by the Hand of God
14 The Perfect Kiss
15 Blue Monday
16 Dream Attack

ilxor, Friday, 19 July 2013 16:24 (twelve years ago)

eight years pass...

I was going to put on "Low-Life," but for some reason put this one on for the first time in eons. Still sounds great!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 December 2021 00:54 (four years ago)

I saw them in Denver, Colorado back in 1985. One of the best shows I have ever seen, they were at their peak. I have searched and searched for photos from that gig, I don't think anyone has ever put them up.

Setlist:

Sunrise
This Time of Night
Hurt
Thieves Like Us
5 8 6
Everything's Gone Green
The Village
Subculture
Denial
Confusion
The Perfect Kiss

Encore:
Ceremony
Blue Monday

Encore 2:
Temptation

jimbeaux, Thursday, 30 December 2021 14:17 (four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.