http://www.mattscdsingles.com/acatalog/tff%20sowing%20the%20seeds%20uk.jpg
"Sowing the Seeds of Love" by Tears for Fears.
Not that they were ever the MC5, but prior to this single (and the album that spawned it), Tears for Fears had a (comparatively) stripped down sound with a manageable balance in the production department. But when they unveiled this top-heavy wedding cake of a tune, it sounded like Sir Elton John singing "I Am the Walrus" while dressed in a suit of armour made out of milk chocolate (his voice slightly muffled by the helmet's visor) and playing a piano made out of Lemon Merigue Pie. Between the strings, the opera singer, the "Penny Lane" horns, and all that excessive crap, I surely challenges all comers (from Ezrin's work with Pink Floyd through afore-mentioned JIm Steinem) as the most needlessly over-tweaked dollop of syrup-laden filligree ever pooped onto tape.
But maybe you disagree. If so, cite your choice and your reasons.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)
and i'd vote instead for the beatles' "free as a bird."
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Brian Miller (Brian Miller), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)
Clearly, Alex, you've never heard TfF's "The Working Hour".
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I thought it was the extremely early-released bonus track from XTC's Nonsuch.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh, I forgot to insert some disgustedly "outrageous" comparisons and snide adjectives: "This snot-caked rat turd might be covered in diamond dust, but it still sounds like Aunt Bea's severed ballsack."
(NB: The song isn't that bad, actually. But it is overproduced.)
― Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Elisa (Elisa), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Compared to "Sowing the Seeds...", though? "The Working Hour" sounds spartan by comparison.
i don't think i can argue with Alex's choice but i thought the track was fantastic then and i think i still do now
I'm not saying it's a bad track, I'm only saying it's hugely overproduced (intentionally or otherwise).
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Me too.
I'm not saying this is the most over-produced stuff, but I thought it was a bummer when Billy Bragg went from bare sparse electric guitar to big lush stuff like Worker's Playtime and Don't Try This at Home. The songs sound perfect on the Peel sessions. Eventually I got used to Workers Playtime and now it is one of my favorites, but I remember thinking it was really cheesey the first time I heard it.
Me too except that Worker's Playtime never became one of my favorites. The Pell Session version of "The Short Answer," which very well may be my favorite song of all time*, just doesn't work with the extra junk on it no matter how many times I listen and try to like it.
*As much as I bandy about words like "favorite" and "of all time" when talking music, I am serious about that song. I still find it as incredible as the first time I heard it, and I still think it is absolutely brilliantly written and perfectly matches lyrics to music in the context of the little snapshot/story of a life it is creating. It is the only song that has ever made me pull over to the side of the road rather than keep driving. Once just to listen and once because I teared up something fierce singing along to it, couldn't stop, and wasn't having the easiest time seeing the road while sobbing.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
i mean you do all realise it's one big sample right?
― Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM ! piano, choir, orchestra, loud drums and...3 guitar solos... (+ the video as the cherry on the cake !)as for crazy in love, i don't see how it compares as far as overproduction is concerned. i agree that it's just a sample with drumtracks and vocals on it (great track tho).
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)
But that's just me. (I am also prejudiced because the original source of the horns is one of my favorite songs and I feel like the bride has been stripped bare by the bachelors, so ignore if you h8 Chi-Lites-based rockism.)
― Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)
I suppose it should just be a music TypeList so I can mention it, but holy crap the hook on Beyonce's "Crazy In Love" is working. It's a sample from the Chi-Lites' "Are You My Woman", which is not that great a song. (The Chis are known for their ballads for a reason...) Truly elevating the one great part of a sampled track to a new level. Considering how thin Beyonce's voice is and how fantastically inane the lyrics are, the way the song works is really a tribute to its production. A new high water mark for Rich Harrison.
from http://www.anildash.com/poplife/2003/07/crazy_in_love.html
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)
Clearly, Trevor Horn owns this thread.
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)
This is the point where anyone with working ears says, "Wow, this person is completely talking out of his/her ass."
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― irrigation can save your people, Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)
I thought of that myself. It was glorious until that last Missy Elliot record, which felt bloated to me.
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Haibun (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)
????
This is Not a Test was much more stripped-down and minimal than Under Construction.
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh wow.
― Elisa (Elisa), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Also of note: t.A.T.u.'s "All the Things She Said," and the Jordan Knight song that suddenly turns into Franziskaner oom-pa-pa insanity and then reverts back to its original form.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)
Is there an online equivalent of "high five, maaan!" that isn't just as retarded as the IRL version? Cause "high five, Daaan!"
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)
The sound of happy couples coupling happily in the dark while you and I sat down for tea. I remember you said to me that "no amount of poetry could mend this broken heart, but you could put the Hoover on if you want to make a start."
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Is this impossible to define? One person's overproduced mess is another's wall of sound masterpiece.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Trevor Horn took both to giddy heights.
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)
And for everything else there's Mutt Lange.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe, but on Test I felt like all I was hearing was Missy and Timba showing how clever they could be. So maybe what I'm hearing is not too much production but too few fresh ideas supporting it. And don't get me wrong, I loves me some Missy and Timbaland, but Test was the first time they've ever disappointed.
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― darin (darin), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)
The implication is that the music already exists in some pure, natural state and the producer's role is to capture it with minimal interference. That purist point of view may have made some sense in relation to jazz or early rock and roll but how does it relate to any of the pop musicians listed on this thead? Most of the music mentioned doesn't even exist outside of the studio in a live setting.
So if I may define the process of "production" as making decisions that will ultimately lead to a finished record then I have to nominate Smile as the most overproduced record of all time. The basic material was there and yet it took 30+ years of second-guessing, re-recording and general dicking around before someone finally decided it was "finished".
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 13 January 2005 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)
not over-produced. it sounds like an 60's album.
― Elvis is Dead, Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Uh... Sergeant Pepper is also a 60s album. How does 60s = not overproduced?
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Something like "Crazy In Love" is different - there you have a mediocre song that is transformed by over-the-top production into something memorable.
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)
While there's certainly good arguments for other definitions, this would be an interesting one to use for the sake of an argument. However I think it leaves out a group of songs which do exist (and in no small number) that are both "decent" songs and transformed in a good way by over-the-top production. (Actually "Sowing the Seeds of Love" is one I think. It would still be a pretty good song without all of the bells and whistles, but they aren't "weighing it down" either.)
You might have actually meant to include that group, but I think the definition would need to be phrased in such a way that it indicates that "overproduction" applies when the production itself is burying the potential of the song rather than enhancing it. And, admittedly, that's subjective too.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
The case for Brit's version of "My Perogative" becomes stronger...
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)
that narrows it down to about 98 percent of all records made these days. maybe 99 percent.
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)
That's the point I was getting at way upthread; "over-" is a negative modifier.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)
The case for Brit's version of "My Perogative" is easier to make because you've got the original with which to compare and contrast. I think all signs also point to overproduction any time you get a chance to hear the "unplugged" version of a song and say to yourself "Wow. When it's just [artist] and [one instrument] that song is waaaay better than the one on the album."
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Anyway, I find it difficult to distinguish between "over-production" and "maximal production" because anything I like which falls into the second category is accused of being in the first category by people who don't like it.
So my answer is Basement Jaxx's "Lucky Star" - which I think is ace obv.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― billstevejim, Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Exactly.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)
How you figure? I was laughing my ass off at Dan's comment.
Besides, I don't exactly hate Tori. I will admit to having a couple of her records (on vinyl no less) and also to having made an assload of money selling a few vinyl copies of the laughably horrible "Why Kant Tori Read" to hardcore fans who thought Tori was the Messiah. (Not that there's anything wrong with being an obsessive fan.)
I think her schtick is well, a schtick, and not a very good one at that. She's easy to potshoot, and I kinda like indulging when there's a good set up. That's all.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― mottdeterre (mottdeterre), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)
exhibit (a): keane's "everything's changing" single on fierce panda. nice clear, pretty production that nobody would reasonably call over-the-top.exhibit (b): the album versions of the same three tracks. a bombastic, kitchen-sink mess.
― the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm not sorry.
How could anyone look bad for making fun of a lady who makes terrible music?
Booyah.
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 13 January 2005 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― bumsch, Friday, 14 January 2005 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Friday, 14 January 2005 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 14 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Which, I suppose, it's supposed to be.
― Chris O., Friday, 14 January 2005 02:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― jim wentworth (wench), Friday, 14 January 2005 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Friday, 14 January 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Frankie Goes to Hollywood haven't been mentioned yet?
I will. I'm seeing lots of Trevor Horn mentions upthread. If you're talking Horn, you have to talk Frankie. And then you're talking about the "Original New York Mix" of "Relax".
― Edward Bax (EdBax), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 14 January 2005 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― maria b (maria b), Friday, 14 January 2005 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Neil Kulkarni, Friday, 14 January 2005 09:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 14 January 2005 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)
I think "T'Pau" was also the name of a Vulcan on Star Trek.
― Edward Bax (EdBax), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
i nominate 'Out Of Your Mind' by Teh Truesteppers ft Dane Bowers and Victoria
― Stevem On X (blueski), Friday, 14 January 2005 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ray from SF, Friday, 14 January 2005 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Friday, 14 January 2005 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Friday, 14 January 2005 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Friday, 14 January 2005 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 14 January 2005 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
1983 single1988 single1995 singlePower, Corruption and Lies version (different?)International version
― LSD ARISTOCAT (ex machina), Friday, 14 January 2005 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― stew, Friday, 14 January 2005 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 14 January 2005 21:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― AleXTC (AleXTC), Saturday, 15 January 2005 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jessie the Drunk Dutch Mountain Dog (Jessie the Drunk Dutch Mountai), Saturday, 15 January 2005 11:02 (twenty-one years ago)
How about some of 1994/95 when every jobbing "grunge" band got their hands on a budget for the first time? "Not the Same" by Dinosaur Jr., all of Nevermind by Nirvana, Siamese Dream etc. Actually for the ultimate get Feeling Better by Sugar, wind on to the last 2 minutes and count the sheer amount of backing vocals.
This, of course, reached a peak with Garbage, after which they all saw sense and either split up or concentrated on more rewarding pastimes such as heroin benders.
― Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Saturday, 15 January 2005 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― stew, Saturday, 15 January 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Victor (Victor), Saturday, 15 January 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)
Muse = good call
― Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Saturday, 15 January 2005 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)
Imagine the usual SAW garb, but x 1000000. It's painful to listen to her low volume, out-of-key whine straining to take precedence over the 95 drum machines.....
― JTS, Saturday, 19 March 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 19 March 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)