Clap Your Hands Say Yeah

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I love this band and they've been gaining steam in NYC, crowded gigs and some local press (in TONY this week, live preview section). They are friends of mine so this is kind of an unsolicited plug, sorry, (I formerly played in a band with the drummer & bass player) but I think I'd want to talk about them anyhow since they seem like they're doing something cool, Smiths and Clean comparisons notwithstanding. Anyone seen them? No record yet but mp3s at their site ihttp://www.clapyourhandssayyeah.com .

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Playing at Sin-e on Fri and Mercury Lounge on Mon for the NYers.

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
Pfork reviewed a track yesterday, and it's there for the listening.

http://pitchforkmedia.com/tracks/05-06-14.shtml

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

sounds a bit like something out of a 1993 cutout bin. not entirely unpretty, but gushing over something this just means indie is old enough for nostalgic revivalism (and, arguably, conservatism).

jermaine (jnoble), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

i agree jermaine. i've met some of the guys before and they are super nice, so I wish them the best, but I'm not really freaking out about it.

breezy, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

It sounds older than that to me. Maybe 1983.

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

I downloaded the tracks that were on Said the Gramophone a few days ago. "The Skin of My Yellow Country Teeth" is amazing, I think. The other one pretty good too. Anyone else seen them live?

Maciej, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Saw them live at Maxwell's in NJ last month, opening for Rye Coalition. Very good- singer's vocals translate well in a live setting. They had problems with the keys, but I blame the soundguy.

Just got the new record yesterday and it's very good as well.

They're playing a free show at South Street Seaport in August, for those interested NYC ILMers.

cdwill, Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

Glowing album review on da fork today.

Does this signal the beginning of the first wave of backlash or something?

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

It got a B+ on Stylus yesterday, too.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

i'm listening to it now (bought it a little while ago, when mr clap your hands dropped them off to other friend at record store) and am listening to it. i'd heard solo stuff on cd-rs and i can't understand the pitchfork review - is it a must that one album per year be compared to neutral milk hotel for no reason at all?

how does the review not talk about television?

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

I think it's now for certain that this album will be one of the year's big indie breakthroughs. It's got the three ingredients:

+ grassroots (or blog) buzz
+ mainstream (ie, Pitchfork) raves
+ it's a very good album and when people download it, they will discover as much

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last, someone builds a mansion of song that reminds us that, at its best, the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

not MY quote

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

+ a name people can squeal about

how long until this pfm review shows up on http://indierock4eva.blogspot.com/

W i l l (common_person), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

No comments about the band, but do any of you get the impression that Pitchfork has an inflated sense of self-importance when it comes to elevating a release into the "Best New Music" category? Do you think post "Funeral", they're just waiting to see another band sell records and sell out venues thanks to the Pitchfork stamp of approval?

Discussion points:

- Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last...the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other

- There's something really refreshing about stumbling across a great band that's trembling on the cusp without any sort of press campaign or other built-in mythology-- you actually get to hear the music with your own ears.

- Indie rock has received a much-needed kick in the pants, and we have the rare chance to decide what a band sounds like of our own accord before any agency cooks up and disseminates an opinion for us. Damn, maybe this is how it's supposed to work!

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

brooker's points are valid inasmuch as the review sacrifices the band for the purposes of some strange market metonymy, as if this band represents the winning underdog spirit of indie rock.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

this first discussion point seems worth discussing, but the other two I could really care less about, they seem like bad industry commentary and not really that important to whether or not the band is actually any good.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

re talking points:

- Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last...the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other

This is true so long as we replace "it seems" with "I feel" and append "for me" to the beginning of that second phrase.

- There's something really refreshing about stumbling across a great band that's trembling on the cusp without any sort of press campaign or other built-in mythology-- you actually get to hear the music with your own ears.

This is true. But it's "refreshing" not because it happens so rarely, in the grand scheme of things, but rather because when it happens to you, individually, it feels really refreshing.

- Indie rock has received a much-needed kick in the pants, and we have the rare chance to decide what a band sounds like of our own accord before any agency cooks up and disseminates an opinion for us. Damn, maybe this is how it's supposed to work!

I think this is hogwash on several points, not the least of which is that Pitchfork is a major tastemaker and will leave many sheep in its wake!

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

Pitchfork: It's pretty weird that we keep getting tied together in the press. Like, a lot of the features I've read on the Arcade Fire mention Pitchfork and vice versa.

Win: They could be asking you a lot of the same questions you could be asking me: How does it feel? How's the hype? Is it weird to be mentioned in the New York Times and the L.A. Times? I'm like, "No, how's that feel?"

Pitchfork: It's really funny. It's like we can't exist independently in the press. I mean, are you as sick of that as we are?

Win: I don't know. I think that people have a narrow view of things. You definitely get a lot of lazy, weak features. And I'm sure you guys probably experience that as well.

Pitchfork: I suppose people need their angle. But I almost just feel bad for you guys. Like we tend to get really carried away when we love a record, and while that tends to help a lot of bands we think deserve attention, there can also be negative repercussions if we go too nuts.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

you guys forgot:

"I mean, really: A band that mashes together Talking Heads and Neutral Milk Hotel while also stopping in to visit the shimmering, wafting ambiance of Yo La Tengo, the harmonic trickery of Modest Mouse, and the chorused guitarwork of pre-Loveless My Bloody Valentine? What website do you think this is? We are fucking there."

b'angelo, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last, someone builds a mansion of song that reminds us that, at its best, the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other... Color me extremely dubious.

Gotta say the reference points and comparisons in that review do NOT conjure up "raw, celebratory spirit" for me - Modest Mouse, Yo La Tengo, Interpol?? Shit, if I'd known it was gonna be that kind of party.... I'd have made other plans for the evening :-O

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

But that's obv a matter of taste, fandango.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

Gah. I'm, gonna have to download something & find out myself. Those reference points sound incredibly misleading.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)

then PFork has already won.

Fetchboy (Felcher), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

If it's any use, the band sounds nothing at all like Neutral Milk Hotel.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Sean M., it may have blog buzz and all that, but it's missing something else very important: a label.

Most people who would buy this album aren't going to be able to just walk into a record shop in their city and pick this up. That's going to erase this album off many people's shopping lists, no matter how good it may be or no matter how much buzz it may have.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

are you sure they weren't re-reviewing the arcade fire album by mistake?

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Most people who would buy this album aren't going to be able to just walk into a record shop in their city and pick this up.

Most people who would buy this album probably read about it on someone's blog, and then possibly on Stylus and Pitchfork. Logic leads me to believe that anyone who finds out about an album online can buy it online.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

As for not being on a label, I wouldn't be surprised if the band's already considering a number of offers. And, if not yet, very soon.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

Johnny Fever, you're obviously right, but my point isn't that it'd be impossible to buy, just more difficult, and that's going to mean less sales and less "one of the year's big indie breakthroughs."

I hate buying albums online. I much, much, much prefer to shop in an actual store. There's so many albums on my list of music to buy that I'd rather pick up those things at a store than order something (ie this) online to satisfy my infinite hunger for noise.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

And yeah, of course they can be picked up by a label and have this album reissued. I'm just saying, as it stands right now. Y'know.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

i like it but i don't love it
but I wish them the best
pitchfork LOVES to be "first"
even when they are not

i mean they gave "best new music" to the boy least likey to

what happened then?
nothing

breezy, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

I do mean "breakthrough" in terms of name, not in terms of sales. (cf The Unicorns, Broken Social Scene). The album's not quite likable/pop enough to take the Arcade Fire/Postal Service pedestal.

I was listening to this again on the ride home and it's not as good as I remembered - but it is very good.

Also, I really liked the feel of the writing in that Pitchfork review (if not the entirety of its substance). Such excitement, really clearly articulated.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

david bowie was apparantly at their show last evening in NYC ... just to see them specifically. it's like the arcade fire and david byrne all over again.

Gregory T (tubesocks), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

most likely this type of attention will just polarize people, those that love and hate. usually thats' what overzealous pitchfork reviews tend to do

i fall in the grey area on this one
not sure there is really all that much to talk about and I'm not being a hatah

breezy, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)

Sean M if you like articulated enthusiasm you've got to check out that link i posted above!!

W i l l (common_person), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

Also, I really liked the feel of the writing in that Pitchfork review (if not the entirety of its substance). Such excitement, really clearly articulated.

Citing reference points to other bands for the reader's benefit is one thing, but that review, to me, read like "this sounds like this, not this, but sort of like this." Yawn.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

David Spade has a band?

Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

Will - that is actually a cool link, although I resent the fact that the blog's frame (ie, the absurd GS quote "The Shins will change your life") appears to be making fun of me. :(

Johnny Fever - It wasn't those bits I was thinking of. But, um, I can't find any of the bits I was. Maybe the breathlessness? Maybe I made it up? I do usually like "it sort of sounds like this, but not, and also like this, kinda" reviews, though, so long as the referents are very disparate and unexpected. Sadly, that's not the case here. ('Oh look, Neutral Milk Hotel, Interpol and Yo La Tengo as indie rock touchstones!')

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

These are ok, not exactly 'raw and celebratory' but there is something pleasingly loose and uncaring, unstudied (uncool) about them. Reminds me of 'indie rock' from more innocent times. It's pretty generic (for me) though.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
So, they're the NYC USE?

donut e- (donut), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

No, unfortunately. 33Hz is a bit closer to the NYC USE, but without the indieness.

Brian Miller (Brian Miller), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Oh my god, what sloppy, uninteresting, horrendously sung shit. But what a brilliant PR campaign! Whoever masterminded that "David Bowie came to see them!" meme is a genius (nowhere, but nowhere, does it say that Bowie LIKES them).

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 14 July 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)

Bowie does like The Secret Machines though.

I went to see TSM in March at Irving Plaza NYC and I looked up in the balcony (the VIP section) and he was really enjoying the show.

It's just cool to say "I saw Bowie really enjoying himself"

Michael Costello (MichaelCostello1), Thursday, 14 July 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)

It's just cool to say "I saw Bowie really enjoying himself"

I dunno, man. That sounds kind of dirty to me.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 14 July 2005 04:44 (twenty years ago)

someone should form a band called "Blog Buzz"

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

the Thin White Dudes

donuty! donuti! donuté! (donut), Thursday, 14 July 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

OTM M@tt

haha

pitchfork has oficially just turned into a clap your hands fan site
it's like costant updates in the news sections, HEADLINE: clap your hands STILL don't have label, still have nothing new to report, but we are excited to report there is nothing to report. more tomorrow about how clap your hands are playing a sold out show at southpaw

whoop!

breezy, Thursday, 14 July 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

I await PFM's "So, yeah, we're always getting linked with you in the press HOW EMBARASSING!!!" interview with Clap Yes Handymen later in the year.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

I find CYHSY less offensive than The Wilderness and Art Brut and that's about as high as a compliment as I can pay one PF's "best new bands" these days.

darin (darin), Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

Pitchfork: It's kind of strange how your band's newfound popularity is somehow associated with our glowing review of your first album. What do you assess from that?

donuty! donuti! donuté! (donut), Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

that will totally happen. i think it all just makes ryan sleep well at night knowing what POOOOOWWWERRRR he has
hah

he MADE THEM
i'm surprised they didn't get them to do the intonation festival

breezy, Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

It's not Ryan. It's some monstrous PR force that's coming from, or near, the band itself. Pitchfork, and everyone else, seem to think they're actually DISCOVERING this band while they're getting spoonfed strategic trivia. Parse the wording on that Bowieanecdote: DB had "requested a CD a few days before" coming to the show." What does "requested" mean in the context of an unsigned band? Did he write to their web site asking for a free copy instead of bying it because he's thrifty like that? It's obvious that someone around the band knows Bowie and in the position to ask favors from him; in which case, their being unsigned becomes a little less relevant.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 14 July 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

Erm, Bowie /space/ anecdote.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 14 July 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)

I finally heard a song by these guys. It kinda makes sense they might be big in a "Coldplay's too famous, who do I love now?" way.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 14 July 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

Why does everyone believe there is something sinister or devious about this band? Isn't it entirely possible that word on them spread around the blogosphere and eventually fell on the ears of PFork, TMT, etc.?

When I uploaded the album to #IT at the beginning of June, no more than 5 or 6 people grabbed it that day. A few days later (before any of the online zines had hyped it), 100 people a day were downloading it. I'm pretty sure this is all due to word of mouth and a few mentions on popular weblogs.

So fuck the PR conspiracy theories. Anyone who buys that shit just has an axe to grind.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 15 July 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)

(hasn't the axe been grinding for years now?)

natedey (ndeyoung), Friday, 15 July 2005 00:53 (twenty years ago)

I just want to point out that this band really is getting good word of mouth entirely on the strength of the record and the enthusiasm of a few people - the label, the band, and whoever is doing their PR/press has been super low key, particularly in contrast with a lot of other artists who are getting pushed like crazy on bloggers and other internet publications.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)

I went back and checked over this record today because I found out that I'm going to see them on a bill soon with Scissor Sisters and Maxi Geil (oh my God, it's going to rule), and I found that I liked it more than when I first tried it out. There's some songs in the middle of the album sequence that are pretty nice.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

Why does everyone believe there is something sinister or devious about this band?

Because there is absolutely nothing remarkable about it otherwise?

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 15 July 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)

Why does everyone believe there is something sinister or devious about this band?

Because there is absolutely nothing remarkable about it otherwise?

---

Exactly. It's just like, so what?

enjoy bell woods, Friday, 15 July 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

Opinions = assholes, etc.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 15 July 2005 05:21 (twenty years ago)

"When I uploaded the album to #IT at the beginning of June, no more than 5 or 6 people grabbed it that day. A few days later (before any of the online zines had hyped it), 100 people a day were downloading it. I'm pretty sure this is all due to word of mouth and a few mentions on popular weblogs."

i was one of those people... id been looking for it after, coincidentally, downloading some songs that Mystery and Misery posted... and i dont think i posted to say thanks at IT.. so thanks.

Quinn (quinn), Friday, 15 July 2005 05:53 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, M&M was where I'd first read about them too. Is Jason the source of all the hype?

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 15 July 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)

It's some monstrous PR force that's coming from, or near, the band itself.

This is just stupid. I can tell you for a fact that there's no monstrous PR force and that the band is mystified just as everyone else is.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 15 July 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

I mean, there was no "blogger press campaign" if that's what you mean. They do have a manager (who seems a tad clueless imo) and the support of several decent clubs in nyc(the dude at pianos loved them early on) and a ton of nyc kids turned bloggers who like the band and go to all the gigs.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 15 July 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

whoever is doing their PR/press has been super low key,

Good of you to focus on the PR agency rather than the band itself Matthew. Taking a few career notes from them?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 15 July 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
[ADMIN: spam removed]

slot machines, Sunday, 7 August 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)

This I admit is the first post about the band that I'm intrigued by.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 August 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Box Cars!!

donut ferry (donut), Sunday, 7 August 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

IS anyone planning to see these guys for free at the Seaport Music Festival at 7 tonight? Should be fun.

paulhw (paulhw), Wednesday, 10 August 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

This I admit is the first post about the band that I'm intrigued by.

Gamble and win big with CYHSY!! YOU CAN NOT LOSE!!

Confounded (Confounded), Wednesday, 10 August 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

i find myself sort of liking it yet pretty annoyed by the talking heads sound alike quality. that and one of the tunes sounds way too much like a melody in a sebadoh song. ("brand new love" i think.) it's like a blantant rip off that's not identified as a cover.

m.

msp (mspa), Thursday, 11 August 2005 02:25 (twenty years ago)

I walk into Sonic Boom Records tonight (after my last day on my now ex-contract) just to dig around the used bins. That Guy In Sonic Boom is playing something rather indie and boring (not to equate the two.) Not surprising. Except this time, it's for the worst.. because the band sounds like they're REALLY trying hard to make a catchy fun song, but the band sound like they were force-fed Benadryl. The singer sounds a little bit like David Saunders from The 3Ds, but less wrought, more singy, and -- well -- on Benadryl. There are occasional moments where very resonant harmonies collide, and there's an attempt at providing hope in the form of a 4/4 beat, but these hopes are always crushed by the after effects of the Benadryl as the songs just become.. so... incredibly.... fucking.... boring. I mean this makes Mr. Singer Songwriter Of Sominex himself M FUCKING WARD sound like fucking DISCO TEX in comparison. This band makes The Go! Team sound like The Locust.

Then the unexpected happens. That Guy At Sonic Boom turns the CD off. He turns it off and puts something else on.

This NEVER happens. I mean, he's a nice guy, but he's usually the purveyor of indie mediocrity. He NEVER allows a highly boring indie rock record to stop before the last note and those 30 seconds of the afterglow of bore, to allow the flavorless sap to ooze about a few millimeters from the master stereo system first, before either putting on another similar CD or, best yet, letting his co-worker put something on instead.

I'm stunned. His CO-WORKER is stunned too. He goes "what was that all about?" in all seriousness, just having witnessed actual impatience from That Guy In Sonic Boom. That Guy responds "omg well.. you know.. i thought a band called Clap Your Hands Say Yeah would sound.. well you know.. more exciting.. and i was waiting to hear the parts that would make me want to clap my hands... but.. they never came.. and it was just.. REALLY boring.. so I had to stop it."

I froze. I didn't evoke it, but my mental reaction was somewhere between "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!" and that climactic scene in Rosemary's Baby where Mia Farrow covers her mouth, widens her eyes until they almost fall out, and screams "IIIIT CAAAAAAAAAAN'T BEEEEEEEEE!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!"

Well, that does it then. This confirms that -- officially -- hype dead.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 11 August 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm pretty sure the hype isn't dead just yet:
http://www.brooklynvegan.com/

That's a lot of people.

cdwill, Thursday, 11 August 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)

Who like a shitty sounding band.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 11 August 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)

Their army of publicists forced David Byrne to go to that show!!!

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 11 August 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

no no, I mean the concept of hype is now truly a pile of disorganized carbon atoms in my heart and mind now, whereas it was just an annoying gnat before.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 11 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Dear Backlash: I don't agree with you; therefore, your opinion is illegitimate and the result of insidious PR.

marc h. (marc h.), Thursday, 11 August 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Luv, Marc.

marc h. (marc h.), Thursday, 11 August 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

I was addicted to their CD for a couple weeks.

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 11 August 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

i thought a band called Disco Inferno would sound..
i thought a band called Boredoms would sound..
i thought a band called the Pop Group would sound..
i thought a band called the Pixies would sound..

which obviously isn't to say that CHSY are comparable to those bands, or that they had the same intent when choosing a name, but isn't it a bit silly of a record store clerk to expect much of anything based on a band's name?

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 11 August 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

OF COURSE it's silly! It was that,combined with realizing who I was hearing so much about but actually finally listening to, that caused my subsequent reaction.

donut ferry (donut), Thursday, 11 August 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

oh! i kind of misread your post then! admittedly that story is pretty funny.

sleep (sleep), Thursday, 11 August 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

MEANWHILE...according to the word I just got on a London-based journalist mailing list...

They've signed!

To, um...4AD. *plotzes*

No confirmation yet but I have the creeping horrors.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

"anonymous source" told me this as well. and touring japan with The Pixies. (!?)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I was befuddled by that info too.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

When I was picking up the Stooges reissues yesterday (as well as finding a motherlode of used symbol-era Prince CD-singles.. OWAH!), they played this goddamn album. I guess I won't be able to escape it now.

After another listen, the voice sounds not as much like David Saunders from the 3Ds as much as Gunnar Hjálmarsson from Bless/Dr. Gunni (Icelandic rock dude).. but on Benadryl.

I'm still just astounded at the "trying hard to sound like we care, but really we're try.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz" at this album. Granted, many bands have given off that impression -- like Pavement for instance -- but speaking as someone who's hardly a Pavement apologist, at least Pavement had a LOT more going on in their music to back up their looseness...(if the term "looseness" really applies.). This CYHSY album sounds like they want to sound loose just because loose is supposed to sound good by default. Like how really crappy bands purposely recorded themselves on boomboxes a decade ago because they heard "lo-fi" was hip.. or something. Ugh.. someone scrape this album from the gutter already, please.

donut ferry (donut), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

How dare you speak against the Pitchfork approval rating. You will be burned atop a heap of discarded Modest Mouse promos.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

Modest Mouse sound like Parliament in comparison to this band!

MAYBE.... the band is better live. But if the album is an indication of their live shows, Pixies were smart in getting a dreadfully boring band to open for them. It will pump up the crowd even more when Pixies take the stage. Maybe 4AD should help reform Spirea X as well and thrown them on.

donut ferry (donut), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

No way, man, Clap Your Hands etc. are clearly this decade's equivalent (in 4AD terms) of the Paladins.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

omg that's amazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

donut ferry (donut), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

They've signed!

To, um...4AD.

Note to self: learn to sound like shit.

On the other hand...

[Hangs self in bout of sour grapes]

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

Minotaur Shock and Piano Magic are signed to 4AD too. Big fuckin deal.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

Actually, the 4AD thing is just a rumor - they did meet with them, but they have not signed to any label as of this writing.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

MAYBE.... the band is better live.

Nah, they are pretty drab live. But then, I saw them on the same bill as Scissor Sisters and Maxi Geil, both of whom make most bands seem totally dull in comparison.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

I have this sudden, inexplicable urge to enter an online poker tournament.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

http://www.ohmyrockness.com/images/bands/clap.jpg

"Fuck, 7/2 offsuit AGAIN?"

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

This guy seems to like them live:
http://ni9e.com/blog_images/cyhsy_web.mov

Brian Turner (btwfmu), Friday, 19 August 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)

whoever is in charge of 4AD's A&R at the moment needs a good shaking

jimmy glass (electricsound), Friday, 19 August 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)

This guy seems to like them live:

RAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFULLLLLLLLLL!!!!

Holy shit. I love you, Brian Turner.

Clay Your Hands Say Yeah is God's revenge on the masses who dissed Einar Örn and Frank Black for sounding too "whiny".

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:24 (twenty years ago)

I made it as far as when fuckface started to sing and died inside. But the visual of dancing dude makes me happy. In theory I should praise him for getting down...but in practice, I mock him for his taste.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:39 (twenty years ago)

Clay Your Hands Say Yeah is God's revenge on the masses who dissed Einar Örn and Frank Black for sounding too "whiny".

Donut, I take offense.

Clay (cws), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:44 (twenty years ago)

GOD's the one taking offense apparently!

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:08 (twenty years ago)

this band is atrocious. the fact that any label wants them is ridiculous

kev, Friday, 19 August 2005 06:02 (twenty years ago)

Flap Your Thighs Say Xenical!

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Friday, 19 August 2005 07:24 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to be the fucken dissenter and say that I like their record. It's not exactly earth shattering or orgasmic or achingly beautiful or whatnot, but I do find it a generally fun pop record.

I'm all for a bit of discussion about what we don't like, but dwelling on the negative emotions this band elicits from some seems like a regrettable use of energy. Also, I'm somewhat wary of people's opinions being prejudiced by an emotional rejection of "hype" bands. From where I'm sitting, the ongoing level of critism they're subjected to feels disproportionate to the amount of hype they recieve.

Laney, Friday, 19 August 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

The hype point is always taken. In this case, no amount of hype or nonhype can change the fact the guy sounds like a broken fart machine stuffed with helium.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

now tell us how you really feel, ned

harshaw (jube), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

Wow Ned, I've never seen you so hateful before.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:27 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I've had my moments.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

somebody's grumpy...in reality, their unsigned debut is a mild achievement...its not too surprising that this gathered some hype, "Skin Of My Yellow Country Teeth" and "Home On Ice" in particular are inspired, if a bit derivitive..there's purity in their intention, unlike a lot of similarly hyped bands, so I don't get the backlash...his voice? that's it?

Space Is the Place (Space Is the Place), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:41 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure if Ned is OTM but I agree with him.

don weiner (don weiner), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

yeah these guys have not signed to any label yet, bros. and it's not rocket surgery as to why a label woud sign them - their cd has already sold a shit-load thanks to the "pitchfork effect."

xpost - yeah the dude can't sing.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 19 August 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

I'll admit I'm having fun being a hatah on this thread, and I'll stop very soon... but that initial story regarding how I first heard them is entirely true.

And usually with most bands that give me a nauseous first impression, I learn to not puke as much the more I am forced to listen. Still though, every time I hear a band that justifies the term "self-fulfilling prophecy" even more, along comes the most SELF-FULFILLING PROPHETIC BAND EVER!

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

..and I'll fully admit that U.S.E. qualify just as much as Clap Your Hands Say Yeah... except the hype source isn't Pitchfork in the former case, that's all. And musically they're different of course, but I could see -- in other ways -- why U.S.E. completely rub many people the wrong way, which is perfectly fine. In this case, I just happen to love what U.S.E. does; and I can't be bothered with CYHSY, that's all.

I'm sure both bands have "purity in their intention"... but so what? I'm sure the Lawdy Mama Blues Band that just formed the other day at your neighborhood Guitar Center docking bay have purity in their intention, too.

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

This is by far my favorite thread ever!

Ned and Donut are on fire!

Two thoughtful listens to CYHASY did absolutely nothing for me. I'm very skeptical of the hype machines these days.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

how do you break a fart machine?

i love the lawdy mama blues band!

i still haven't heard clap your hands say yeah!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)

http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/images/clapping.GIF

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

I couldn't find a gif to symbolise saying "yeah", the best I could do was this:

http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/images/cooldudeani.gif

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"
"YEAH!....YEAH!.....YEAH!.....YEAH!"

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 19 August 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure the Lawdy Mama Blues Band that just formed the other day at your neighborhood Guitar Center docking bay have purity in their intention, too.

To quote Alex in NYC,
BWAHAHAHAAAAAAA

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 19 August 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

This band is just so much beige pudding, y'know?

And suggesting otherwise would imply a degree of aural decrepitude on part of the declaimer.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Friday, 19 August 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

false

sleep (sleep), Friday, 19 August 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

After hearing CYHASY, the hype behind Arcade Fire seems quite explicable by comparison.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

that shit was mad explicable

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 19 August 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Meh

älänbänänä (alanbanana), Saturday, 20 August 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

suddenly that alec ounsworth guy is playing shows all over town, like he's a goddamned local or something.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 20 August 2005 13:21 (twenty years ago)

He lives in Philly.

mcd (mcd), Saturday, 20 August 2005 13:37 (twenty years ago)

I don't think carpetbagging is the main problem here.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 20 August 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

Cockfarming, however, is.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 20 August 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

mcd, thanks captain obvious!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Saturday, 20 August 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

Uh yeah, now I see. Oh well.

mcd (mcd), Saturday, 20 August 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

OK, hating is fun, but how come nobody asked the author of the thread what he likes about the band? I honestly want to hear a good defense of it. I mean, the guys are not offensive by any means -- they just sound exactly like 34,000 other sloppy campus bands who squeeze out two gigs each before rightfully disbanding in time for exams. People on this thread alone have probably played in a dozen bands that sounded like this. So that fact that music lovers find something interesting about CYSHY is more maddening to me than, say, the success of an abjectly awful band like Three Doors Down. What is it?

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 20 August 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

I know weird mergers happen.. but when did indie band publicist companies and spam corporations merge?

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Sunday, 21 August 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

I'm wondering if the backlash isn't a bit of a "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice..." thing, in regard to the whole hype built on blogs/Pitchfork. It seems that a lot of people (not just here) are going out of their way to loudly express how shit they think this band is.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Sunday, 21 August 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

yeah, but backlash is better hype than faint praise or no press at all.

For every 20 people that hype a band, there are 8 that will automatically backlash against said band.

And for every 20 backlashers, there's around 8 or so that will go "why is this band so polarizing? there MUST be something engaging about them. I will seek to find out."

Score.

donut floccinaucinihilipilification (donut), Sunday, 21 August 2005 04:23 (twenty years ago)

This shit makes MIA look great

I'm Hi, Jared Fogle (ex machina), Sunday, 21 August 2005 04:24 (twenty years ago)

mostly harmless

rogermexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 21 August 2005 07:43 (twenty years ago)

I honestly want to hear a good defense of it.

I feel like I'm walking into a trap, but ok.

I hate to be, uh, Captain Obvious again. Don't want that nickname to stick! I'm a little baffled by their popularity myself. If I had to guess I'd say that the most interesting thing about this band is how they utilize these familiar chord progressions, almost like Dylan chord progressions (harmonica emphasizes this), Velvets chord progressions, which of course are even older than Dylan & the Velvets. While the sound is not exactly new and def "indie" or whatever, I think there's more of a kinship here with songwriters (structure-wise, also the aim lyrically, probably), Jonathan Richman or Bob Dylan, than 34000 campus bands, who would rather emulate Malkmus's dada shrug. This is my guess as to while they're popular; it's familiar. And while your classic ilmer is probably more interested in the unfamiliar, clap seems to pull off this trait in a scruffy indie underdog kinda way that appeals to a lot of people. Now, can I understand how people hate Alec's voice? Sure. Sometimes I wonder why he doesn't just sing like a normal person for once. I will admit, I like this band b/c they're my friends, and that is rather difficult to separate for me with the music. Would I like them otherwise? Not sure, but I've listened to it quite a bit and have never bristled like the hataz.

mcd (mcd), Sunday, 21 August 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

You're definitely not walking into a trap. I really wanted to hear something like this from someone who's not a paid professional.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Sunday, 21 August 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

I don't really understand the hate. I downloaded a couple of songs: they sound way more like the Talking Heads than I expected (usu Talking Heads comparisons = sort of herky-jerky-quirky pop, maybe with some polyrhythms, but here the dude is actually doing a David Byrne vocal impression, too) but not in a particularly annoying way or anything. Maybe a little. I don't know. I was interested. They also remind me of Galaxie 500 a bit.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 21 August 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

On "Country Teeth" the guy sings in The Simpsons 'generic teen' voice!

http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/homepage/csac/csac8573/Simpsons/imageJG8.JPG

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 21 August 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

Still not sure about them, but at the end of the album there are some good songs, especially "Gimme Some Salt".

zeus, Tuesday, 23 August 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

they just sound exactly like 34,000 other sloppy campus bands who squeeze out two gigs each before rightfully disbanding in time for exams. People on this thread alone have probably played in a dozen bands that sounded like this

Joseph, any critic can say that about any band. Try again.

marc h. (marc h.), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

you can maybe say it about the dwarves, but don't be surprised when they puke on your shoes afterwards.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 23 August 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the Dylan and the Velvets together I never heard anybody do that, that is awesome, isn't it? Yall they are shy, but sooo nice. I asked them for autographs and they got all embarrassed, but then when I asked them where they got the idea for "The Sweater Song," they laughed, and that broke the ice. Oh I rhymed HEY

Big Fat Drunk Chick With A BoomBox, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)

are you mary lou lord?

jimmy glass (electricsound), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)

I wish! (Also wish I had her figure) Hey what's she doing these days?

Big Fat Drunk Chcik With A BoomBox, Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:33 (twenty years ago)

not sucking kurt cobain's dick.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)

Well, one would hope.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)

I never thought I'd say this, but can we talk about the band again?

donut gon' nut (donut), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:17 (twenty years ago)

sorry, bros, i thought that was the only reason anybody knows who mary lou lord is.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:18 (twenty years ago)

Joseph, any critic can say that about any band. Try again.

OK, more to the point; the songwriting is boring, the singing is tuneless, the arrangements are halfass and the whole package reeks of a distinctly non-endearing brand of hobbyism.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:20 (twenty years ago)

(Well going by who she covered, i thought it would Nick Solomon, personally, but I digress.)

donut gon' nut (donut), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)

I heard a couple trax and found the vocals more slappable than Belle & Sebastian, but then "In This Home on Ice" sounded good at a crowded gay bar Saturday, so maybe he just needs to be mixed down.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

The vocals are mixed way too loud. If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't mind this band really. The music isn't that bad. Can't say I'm inspired to buy this album though.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 24 August 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

OK, more to the point; the songwriting is boring, the singing is tuneless, the arrangements are halfass and the whole package reeks of a distinctly non-endearing brand of hobbyism.

= "I don't like them." It doesn't actually describe anything to do with how the music sounds. "Half-ass" is no more valid critically than just vapidly saying that something "sucks." Come on, ILM, if you're going to hate, remember what they told you in elementary school: Use your words!

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 26 August 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

downloaded a song off salon, wanting to be a contrarian and like clap yr hands say yeah.

however, it just doesn't grab me...at least this song....it sounds like some shambly poorly rehearsed garage band trying and failing to write a Smiths song.

It's called "Upon this Tidal Wave of Young Blood"...is this indicative of what they are like?

on the other hand, I also downloaded a song by the other current P-Fork rave, Wilderness, and MY GOD THIS IS FUCKING GREAT!....sort of "stately" is a way...it feels like Metal Box to me with out actually sounding anything like Metal Box....I could see the vocalist being a dealbreaker for some people, but I like him...reminds me of G04 a little....Drummer is cool...he's basically always doing fills....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 26 August 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

i saw a video of their last night, the song was better than I was expecting it to be.

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 26 August 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

It's called "Upon this Tidal Wave of Young Blood"...is this indicative of what they are like?

It's the last track on the album, probably for good reason: It's great, but you need to have bought into their sound already to want to hear Ounsworth tunelessly shouting "child stars" over and over. Try "Details of the War" for the Dylan-y thing, or "Over and Over Again" or "The Skin of My Yellow Country Teeth" for the catchy indie-rock thing.

(Yes realize irony of "use your words" dude twice resorting to "thing," thx.)

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 26 August 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

What kind of words would you rather have me use instead of "tuneless?" I don't even want to resort to snarking, I'm just trying to state that the guy is a poor vocalist. He misses half of his notes. Now, I'm as much of a relativist of the Dylan-is-a-great-singer school as the next ILMer, so let me qualify this: the guy is a poor singer who sings in a style that requires a better vocal.

Same thing with the "sloppiness" of the playing. Yes, it's a tired word; yes, they're not sloppier than, say, Sebadoh, or Pavement circa S&E; but the references they seem to wear on their sleeves - Talking Heads, the Smiths, etc - are all quite tight and precise-sounding bands; in that sense, CYHSY appear to be trying for something and failing, as opposed to not giving a fuck.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 26 August 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

That's better. I disagree that their sloppiness "fails" because their influences weren't sloppy -- bands are allowed to be original! I do agree, as you noted, that his vocals are "tuneless," but I'd argue that they're tuneless in a very stylized, exciting, beautiful way. (In other words, calling them tuneless doesn't necessarily mean calling them bad.) I guess that's where we disagree, and that's perfectly fair.

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 26 August 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)

I hate the band name. Hate. And musically, I don't think they're anythign remarkable, and the singer's voice bugs me.

And yet, I keep wanting to hear "Is This Love?". So they might be on to something.

Lyra Jane (Lyra Jane), Friday, 26 August 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

disagree that their sloppiness "fails" because their influences weren't sloppy -- bands are allowed to be original!

so yr saying you know the sloppiness is planned? maybe they can't play for shit. it happens.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 26 August 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

Are we getting all the pokerbots because the band have the word "hand" in their name?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 26 August 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)

matt: have you heard alec ounsworth's flashy python tracks? the early version of "details of the war" is far different.. and inferior.

marc h. (marc h.), Saturday, 27 August 2005 01:48 (twenty years ago)

Who claps their hands and says 'yeah' anyway? No-one who wants to get laid that night. I'm off to play some poker.

moley, Tuesday, 30 August 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)

for a brief moment i thought the URL said http://www.babyshambles.net/play-texas-holdem.html

jimmy glass (electricsound), Thursday, 1 September 2005 05:28 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Thights Say BANGBUS!

donut gon' nut (donut), Thursday, 1 September 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

Hey blackjack, those links are great. Keep 'em coming mate. I love poker. Poker poker poker. Online poker online poker *claps hands* yeah!

moley (moley), Thursday, 8 September 2005 03:05 (twenty years ago)

yes it is interesdting!!!!

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 11 September 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

Is "Clap Your Hands Say Yeah" some sort of term literally borrowed from card games? I'd feel really sorry for the band if casino site spam followed their name around everywhere. A google search on their name doesn't reveal any immediate references other than the band itself, but maybe it's just all the hype eclipsing the previous references in the search results?

donut Get Behind Me Carbon Dioxide (donut), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:45 (twenty years ago)

i'd say online casino spam is about just as annoying as the inexplicable omnipresence of CYHSY. i think they make a great match actually!

breezy, Monday, 12 September 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)

donut- it's the word "hands". That's it. That's the only connection.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:51 (twenty years ago)

So, hand lotion discussion forums are getting this spam too, then. Ah, the world is great.

donut Get Behind Me Carbon Dioxide (donut), Monday, 12 September 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

When Clap release their second and third albums and Alec's solo stuff is out, I hope many of you will get to appreciate the range of Alec's songwriting and lyricism. The first time I heard him play, I thought he sounded like Jack White and that if he traded his acoustic for an electric, his music would sound like Jon Spencer or White Stripes, Black Keys, rock/blues etc. But when he got a band together, he didn't sound anything like that. In fact, aren't the White Stripes the only band they HAVEN'T been compared to? (HOW do they sound like Neutral Milk Hotel by the way?) The Talking Heads comparisons will become irrelevant, all of the comparisons will eventually become irrelevant because it won't be long before people start comparing other bands to THEM, not the other way around. Alec and Clap Your Hands are not going away and will only continue to build on their success in the future because Alec is an original voice (both literally and metaphorically) that has plenty more to say. Time not being a factor, he could release four albums worth of material tomorrow. And they'd all sound different. It's fun to be blog fags and hate bands, but I think withholding judgement about Alec and this band and giving them a chance to develop, before writing them off as a buzz band, may keep a few of you from having to eat your words on down the road. Look at A.M. by Wilco. It's a good album, it's a fun album. But none of us knew that Yankee Hotel Foxtrot was going to come out of them. Be patient. This band has existed for ONE YEAR. I truly believe that Alec will come to be a major figure in contemporary music. And not in terms of record sales. They aren't really into getting as famous as fast as possible, or they would already be signed up with a major. Have any of the haters seen his solo shows? If you don't like his voice, that won't change, but seeing him play solo allows all of the hype/buzz/xxxxxx comparisons to fall away and let his songs stand on their own. And they're beautiful. There will still be lots of people who are going to hate everything this man releases, but I think many people will be pleasantly surprised as his career develops. Also, they're all really nice. That doesn't make anyone's music better. Joss Stone is nice too. But there are just so many other bands to hate that are more deserving of the sourpuss treatment. Alec got a band together, recorded an album, released it, performed live and became the toast of New York in one year with NO famous people connections, no truckloads of money, no mega media blitz, no OC appearance. Just work and talent. It's only 38 minutes of music! Don't write him off yet.

Rick Herron, Wednesday, 14 September 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)

Why oh why didn't I just start another Jandek thread?

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

texas holden poker strategy OTM.

donut Get Behind Me Carbon Dioxide (donut), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

this thread has gone DADA! and yet i cannot keep myself from visiting all those interesting links...

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

BLEchj

~~~~ DODONGO DISLIKES SMOKE ~~~~ (ex machina), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 07:37 (twenty years ago)

The Moby threads get all the solitaire spam, right?

M. V. (M.V.), Thursday, 22 September 2005 02:37 (twenty years ago)

Finally heard this band. Love the Velvet Underground identikit, especially the rolling drums and droning guitars, but the guys voice is really terrible. I remember thinking Dean Wareham's voice was challenging but ultimately wonderful, but this guy, I don't know if I'll ever get used to it. Too bad. (probably sounds great live)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

Spencer, that's basically a very friendly take of what Rod Smith says (alongside a slightly less berating review of the newest by Black Dice)

donut Get Behind Me Carbon Dioxide (donut), Thursday, 22 September 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)

Spencer's Capsule Review (tm)

"The music is great, the vocals are grate."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 September 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)

i heard most of this in the video store last night. i didn't know what it was initially but worked it out based on the voice and the talking headsishness. i find it very difficult to understand the hate. it really isn't that unpleasant even if the guy's voice is irritating..

jimmy glass (electricsound), Saturday, 24 September 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)

Somehow made my way to the Pitchfork review, then downloaded the album. Google then got me here.

I'm completely knocked out. The album is mostly strong tracks. It catches me in the same place as last year's Modest Mouse album. Does anyone know if has been released in Britain?

I've noticed people saying that CYHSY sound like this and that band. Well I've been big on the Pixes and Modest Mouse recently and I feel CYHSY fit well with those bands.

jamspoon, Saturday, 24 September 2005 02:24 (twenty years ago)

My girlfriend likes this band. I'm really disappointed in her.

adam (adam), Saturday, 24 September 2005 11:43 (twenty years ago)

clap your hands say MEH!

strongo hunkington, Sunday, 25 September 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Slap Your Girlfriend Say I'm Really Disappointed In You

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Sunday, 25 September 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

Not released in the UK yet. They don't have a label or distribution deal for Europe. They're playing Iceland Airwaves, then touring the UK in Oct/Nov, so their cd will be available at the shows and I'm sure record stores will buy up their cd's at the shows and then sell them. I saw somebody on eBay paying over $30 for their cd in the UK, so I know there's demand. Should be widely available to Europe/UK Jan/Feb after they get a deal set up.

Rick Herron, Tuesday, 27 September 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

crap your pants spray gas

hahahoho. this album is pretty good. don't know why except playa hatin people be so vitrolic in their hostility. doesn't sound like talking heads or neutral milk hotel really just front to back manic indie jams, done in ultimate self-released d.i.y. spirit ostensibly people appreciate

the spirit of the cocoa box, Tuesday, 27 September 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Domino Records Blowjob!

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Tuesday, 27 September 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

I was surprised this album is getting trashed by most here. I thought it had some pretty good tracks on there. 'in this home on ice' and 'over and over again' beats kaiser chiefs or magic numbers any day as far as I'm concerned.

antihero (antihero), Tuesday, 27 September 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

i am very interested in the field of click here.

Ross Godfrey (scatter), Wednesday, 28 September 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

Wow, this is some kind of THREAD LEPROSY

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 29 September 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

i would like to share this with you . . . no one's talking about how sometimes they sound like the feelies.

grand coupier, Thursday, 29 September 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah, I can see that too.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

i would like to share this with you . . . no one's talking about how sometimes they sound like the feelies.

because the feelies were actually GOOD?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Yeah perform on Morning Becomes Eclectic from the Sony Music Studios in NYC as part of the CMJ Marathon:

http://66.186.18.80/podcast/mp3/mb/mb050916Clap_Your_Hands_Say_.mp3

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Well, for those of you who like CYHSY, you should definitely check out the debut album by Clor (called Clor) from the UK. The vocal timbre is similar but not nearly as GRATE (to quote Spencer). IMHO, Clor supercedes any redeemability from Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, and actually -- well -- sounds fun!

Granted, maybe the point of the Clap Your Hands album is to be kinda slow, somber, and self-wallowing. That's my problem with the Clap album.. I can't tell if they're trying to be dynamic, or they're trying to be sad, or upbeat, or whatever at any given moment. They fail in all cases. Metal Machine Music has almost as much dynamic range as Clap Your Hands Say Yeah.

I'm hoping for a better sophomore album.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

Rolling Stone, reporting on the mania surrounding Clap Yr Hands You Black Emperor!

Defying the conventional logic that a band will do infinitely better if it has a record deal, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah are proving that a truly independent artist can gain a major following. Clap -- based in Brooklyn and Philadelphia -- have already sold nearly 17,000 copies of their self-released debut, all thanks to word of mouth. And while major-label artists make only about a buck a record, the Clap guys are making a whopping eight dollars per disc -- putting their take so far at more than $130,000. Not too shabby for an album recorded for less than ten grand and distributed by the band itself via countless trips to the post office.

man...damn...17,000...that ain't bad...not too shabby....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

I can't even tell anymore who's the bot and who's a live person on this thread

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

I'm a bot!

This is funny from the RS thing:

Not too shabby for an album recorded for less than ten grand

WOW YOU RECORDED AN ALBUM FOR LESS THAN 10 THOUSAND $$ WOW THAT'S INDIE!

Jeez they must've gone to a pro studio or somethin' that's expensive...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 29 September 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

Seriously. My band's album was recorded for $500 (rented small theater space for two days to record drums, did the rest at home) and will be mastered -- at a fairly high-end facility -- for roughly one grand.

Perhaps nine thousand went toward pitch correction and chamomile tea. Ooh, snap!

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 29 September 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)

I heard they blew the other $9,000 playing online poker.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 September 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

Yeah...I guess my old band spent around that (this was years before I became the second bass player)....but shit they went to Pacyderm right a couple of years after In Utero and PJ Harvey records recorde there came out...at the time, it was pretty hott national pro studio.

My new band's current record will probaby come out around $1000-ish for recording/tape....maybe another 3-500 for mastering and another 1000 for pressing 1000 discs....and I feel like we're being kind of indulgent in terms of wasting lots of time in the studio, etc...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 29 September 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

what the fuck is up with all the poker bullshit??!?!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 29 September 2005 22:15 (twenty years ago)

I really like the album, especially the song "In This Home On Ice".

The voice is what does it for me. So, I can see how if you didn't like the voice, you wouldn't like the band.

James Morris (HorrayJames), Thursday, 29 September 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

xpost:

mainly by word of mouth??? hahaha
you mean PITCHFORK's MOUTH

breezy, Thursday, 29 September 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 22,900 for "clap your hands say yeah" poker. (0.11 seconds)

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 29 September 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

I have to agree with donut, what Clor I've heard was pretty good!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

[ADMIN] All of the spam messages have been shitcanned, and unlogged-in people have been locked from posting to the thread. Apologies for any inconveninece, and for many messages referring to the spam now being out-of-context. Please refer spambotting to the mor request forum! Thanks!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 30 September 2005 07:35 (twenty years ago)

The mor request forum? the MOD request forum, that is!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 30 September 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)

thanks pashmina.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 30 September 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)

Thank you, Pashmina!

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

Donut you do bring up a good point. The album isn't exactly dynamic. It's like a monochromatic paint job. But if you're looking for dynamic, why even approach the indie rock genre, y'know?


mcd (mcd), Friday, 30 September 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

I haven't really dug what I've heard by Clp YR hands.....The Wilderness is the Pitchfork-hyped band with annoying vocalist that I'm digging this year.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

WOW YOU RECORDED AN ALBUM FOR LESS THAN 10 THOUSAND $$ WOW THAT'S INDIE!

I actually don't think that $10K is that extravagant. My band just spent a few thousand. (I don't remember exactly how much: they wisely don't put me in charge of the finances.)

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 30 September 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Yeah beats the shit out of the crappy Wilderness. Official.

zeus (zeus), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

THANKS FOR YOUR VIEWS ON THE WILDERNESS YOUR OPINION IS VERY VALUABLE TO ME!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

I actually don't think that $10K is that extravagant. My band just spent a few thousand. (I don't remember exactly how much: they wisely don't put me in charge of the finances.)

what's a "few" i could see like 5K but 10K is quite a bit (to me at least)....i guess it maybe depends on what city you live in too...where are you?

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

You apparently forget the 'has a shitty singer whose throat you would happily rip out' factor about Get Your Clap Right Here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

(Meanwhile, what I've heard of Clor's music was good fun, what I've heard of Name Your Band Really Badly was not, and thus we stand as we do.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

I've heard of Name Your Band Really Badly was not

haha

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

It also has to do with the fact that Clor is about a gazillion times more interesting. Clor's relative weakness is the voice and lyrics -- which reminds me a bit of the Clap singer!, except not nearly as grating... but the Clor's music really couldn't be any further away a progression than that of Clap. I mean Clor's "Outlines" is the first "indie rock" song that basically acknowledges the genius of Severed Heads' Come Visit The Big Bigot as a template for a pop song, whether they intended it or not. It's finally happened at long last! Clap's songs just remind me of many things that could have been, but did not be.

Donut you do bring up a good point. The album isn't exactly dynamic. It's like a monochromatic paint job. But if you're looking for dynamic, why even approach the indie rock genre, y'know?

I
can't
believe
I
just
read
that

INDIE = GRAYSCALE!

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

I'm in Chicago, Matt.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

Dude do u know Steve Albini

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)

After listening to Clor, I don't really see any similarities. Though, I will say none of it reaches the best moments on CYHSY. Something about the Clap record seems free wheeling and effortlessly good, while Clor sounds more calculated. To me, that doesn't equal more fun, but less fun.

Plus, like I said earlier, the vocals that people seem to point out as making it annoying, is what gives it that extra something for me. I don't think anyone could by annoyed by the vocals with Clor, but they definitley aren't interesting and add nothing to the overall effect.

As far as Wilderness, it's just crap.


James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

is what gives it that extra something for me

Why, exactly?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

Why, exactly?

Because if it's just some generic indie fuck, I doubt it would really grab me. It sounds more unique. No different than the fact that a Morrissey cover by anyone other than Morrissey somehow sounds like shit. I don't even mind that he sounds like David Byrne, because the music doesn't sound like Talking Heads, so it's not exactly rehashing.

It's definitley a risk to sing in a voice that could easily be labeled as annoying, but I think it's a risk worth taking if it adds character to the music for people who actually aren't annoyed by it. If that makes sense.

But, it's important to note, that I'm merely stating that this is an enjoyable record. In a couple of months, it might just be collecting dust. Just wanted to counter a little of the hate.

James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

It's definitley a risk to sing in a voice that could easily be labeled as annoying, but I think it's a risk worth taking if it adds character to the music for people who actually aren't annoyed by it. If that makes sense.

The reasoning's a bit circular but I see what you're trying to get at. But surely you don't need the 'labeled as' part, if you get my drift. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Haha. This could easily turn into something similar to the Coldplay discussion. Do I like it BECAUSE it's annoying? Is it pleasently unpleasent?

James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

I hope I'm not saying that "annoying voices" are bad. I just can't resonate with the Clap singer's voice.. just in this instance.. that's all.

I mean, I enjoy Gunnar's voice in Bless and Dr. Gunni. I like Jad Fair's voice. I like Doc Dart's voice in the Crucifucks. I like Nardwuar's voice in the Evaporators. All of those voices are "grating", but who finds them endearing and who finds them annoying and horrible is just pure random chance based on the listener's taste.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Friday, 30 September 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
I heard this band on the radio last night. When the DJ announced the band, I was kind of half expecting an advert for texas hold-em poker to play halfway through the song.

the music was OK, but the singers voice, to echo comments upthread, was kind of whiny and unlikeable.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)

I took my brother and his friend to see a sold-out(boggled) Clap 'em on Tuesday.
The show was an ear-awful experience.

Honestly, I really did not expect much--the record is pretty flavorless--but I hoped for at least some enjoyment out of the night.

I think what parched my perspective of the ordeal is that Alec as a frontman appeared to be such an asshole. Call it judgment, but *I* felt nothing endearing about his presence, which is why his cry *might* have worked for me. That's why odd-to-the-ear voices work, because they have character, or reality, or conviction, or any slightly redeeming quality. But Ounsworth's sort of pompous attitude caused his delivery to resonate as the most noisome drivel...
By the end of the set I was enough with the monotony and had to walk out of the performance area.

I mean, this is just my view, maybe the distate was of some psychological disconnection that caused me inability to endure. But I don't think I'll be supporting anything more of the Yeah platitude.

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Quod Erat Demonstrandum, bitchez

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the lack of online poker spam in this thread threw me off.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
so how did wichita get the deal in europe in the end and not 4AD?
did they gamble?

joan vich (joan vich), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)

all i know is that their edinburgh gig was terrible.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)

I listened to the disc wondering what the hype was all about. As bemused as I was to hear a band ape the Talking Heads (a lot of people claimed the band an influence but few actually sound like 'em - kinda like Kiss and to a lesser extent, VU) I was just as unamused at how average they were whilst aping.

Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

yes yes very good

more disappointed testimonials, please.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 11 February 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

I am going to see them tonight in ::shudder::: Brooklyn. Anyone else going?

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

C'mon!

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

Seriously, am I going to want to eat a grenade at this show at take huge swathes of the crowd out with me?

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)

I wonder how many people Alex will take with him.

circles, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:01 (eighteen years ago)

"It was horrible...bloody headbands everywhere."

circles, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:02 (eighteen years ago)

I still love the first album. I gave the second one too many fruitless chances out of respect for the first.

nicky lo-fi, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

Take the crowd out, Alex, but save yourself. We like you.

Jazzbo, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

my girlfriend went said it was a bipolar thing, loved some songs, BORED next 2

Surmounter, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

Ugh.

Note to self: don't post on ILM after I end a job. What a spaz I was (is). No regrets about the Sonic Boom story and the "For Every 20 Backlashers" theory...

Alex, if it's any comfort, the Clap Your Hands album from this year sounded much better than the first one. It sounds more Tall Dwarfs-y. Or maybe the singer is now undulating in that Chris Knox/pop-ero Eno frequency that makes it sound rad. Shrug.

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 15 November 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

they are TERRIBLE live, this from someone who likes them.

sean gramophone, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)

Actually quite enjoyed it. Should you care, <a href="http://vassifer.blogs.com/alexinnyc/2007/11/clap-your-hands.html";>you can read all about it</a>.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:51 (eighteen years ago)

Whoops, let's try that again: click here to read my review-of-sorts.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)

Alex, if it's any comfort, the Clap Your Hands album from this year sounded much better than the first one. It sounds more Tall Dwarfs-y. Or maybe the singer is now undulating in that Chris Knox/pop-ero Eno frequency that makes it sound rad. Shrug.

-- Mackro Mackro, Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:01 PM

I liked their first album a lot and was disappointed by the second. That said, of the handful of other albums I bought this year which I'd describe as "disappointing," Some Loud Thunder is the one I keep returning to. There is something about it...

pgwp, Thursday, 15 November 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

they are TERRIBLE live, this from someone who likes them.

-- sean gramophone, Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:47 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

yea i saw them last year at central park, they sucked. but that venue's kinda tough i guess.

sleep, Thursday, 15 November 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

i'm gonna see these ppl tomorrow

Surmounter, Friday, 13 February 2009 05:29 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

their debut was so good u_u

ksh, Sunday, 11 July 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

Wank Your Dick Say Pitchforkmedia

― Mickey (modestmickey)

buzza, Sunday, 11 July 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

ten months pass...

"Let the Cool Goddess Rust Away"
"Details of the War"
"In This Home on Ice"
"Gimmie Some Salt"

listened to the first album again, and these songs still sound like classics to me.

too bad the band never went anywhere with this stripped down sound.

the second album was a huge disappointment for me.

nicky lo-fi, Friday, 13 May 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)

should i trust all the rust that's on tv, y'all!

http://pitchfork.com/news/42577-clap-your-hands-say-yeah-announce-new-album/

markers, Thursday, 19 May 2011 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

three months pass...

New album streaming at Luisterpaal if anyone at all still cares about these guys.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:09 (fourteen years ago)

was listening to bits & pieces of the s/t like, yesterday

markers, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:11 (fourteen years ago)

the first record is genuinely good, i don't even know if i ever made it through all of some loud thunder, but i really like the title track

markers, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:12 (fourteen years ago)

There are actually a couple good songs on this new one, I like "Into Your Alien Arms".

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:34 (fourteen years ago)

Aghhhh. Couldn't get through it. Was really hoping for a return to form--couldn't do the second album, either, but the s/t was really something to me back when it came out. Next time around, maybe.

Was any of the solo/side stuff they did worth hearing?

Darvin H.A.M. (AlexPh), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.