Soulseeking: Nick Southall's overdose

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is supposedly the first installment of a new regular column. Problem is, if Nick hasn't actually downloaded anything for over a year, what's he going to write about? Maybe this is the only time the actual Slsk will be referenced, and the rest will simply wax philosophical about whatever. I personally was hoping it would be a forum to geek out about latest obsessions, triggered by downloaded discoveries. I could fill a few columns about recent longtime searches finally hitting the jackpot, like Haruomi Hosono's fascinating mid-70s forays into music of Polynesia and New Orleans.

Instead, this is just another all-too common case of the burned-out critic. While even mighty icons like Lester Bangs have fallen under this malaise, I have little sympathy. It looks to me like a case of a small child allowed to devour anything he wants in a candy store, only to be found hours later huddled in the corner, covered in vomit, crying and vowing he'll never eat candy again. That old cliche "too much of a good thing" really does apply, be it exercise, sun, ice cream, music or tequila (it's amazing how many people have had a "bad experience in collge" with tequila and can't bear to touch it again).

So whatever happened to self control? You know, pacing yourself so you don't ruin your enjoyment? It seems pretty simple, but it looks like there needs to be some sort of group therapy sessions for burned out critics...

"Feeling inadequate that you can't hear every good album? Can't get excited about your favorite band's new albums? Has mixing too many genres in one day turned everything to a gray blur? Come to Dr. Fester's Retreats for Aesthetes and wash that ennui away within our revolutionary patented aqueous bulbs. For the first day or two, they serve as traditional isolation tanks where you are cut off from all visual and aural stimulation. Thereafter, the bulbs can be transported to environments where people can be seen enjoying music, such as shows and festivals. But you won't be able to hear anything. Alternatively, select patients will be subjected to repeated listens to albums by the Dave Matthews Band or Hoobastank. Either way, after several days we guarantee you will be eager to be free to enjoy music of your choice once again."

I've listened to a lot of music. When I start to feel burned out on absorbing new stuff, I take a break. But rather than make an ass of myself and blabber in public that there's no good new music anymore (to be fair, this is not what Southall said, but I see this all the time), I just spend some time enjoying old favorites. Simon Reynolds responded in his blog that the problem isn't a glut of self-produced crap, but rather the massive amount of "pretty-good-to-almost-excellent" to wade through. It's true there's more of everything -- shit to almost great. Who cares? That only means that if you simply go with the flow and follow your "muse," e.g. dig deep into a current obsession with a certain band or sound or subgenre, you're more likely than ever to stumble upon pleasant surprises.

Recently I wrote an installment of "What Were Your Most Anticipated Albums?", an exercise to remember what it was about certain bands and albums that made me so excited and passionate about them. I haven't introduced the question to this board because I felt it would die a quick death of sarcastic one-liners for all those "too cool 4 skool" to write anything earnest or real. But then again, maybe I'd be pleasantly surprised.

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT! BOYCOTT!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

Outing p2p clients - Classic or Dud?

astroblaster (astroblaster), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)

he is getting old...at the of 26? whoo, bro...too early! i owe most of my music knowledge to soulseek & p2p.

karl76 (karl76), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

The main problem, is that Nick Southall knows absolutely fuck all about music. He should be writing about football, or wanking.

ILX, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

There's quite a few threads where people get emo about old albums, Fastnbulbous, to be honest though one person's story of fevered anticipation is going to be much the same as another's.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

Wow this is really sad news. I never knew the guy, but his writing touched me on many levels. RIP Nick Southall.

Kit Lambert, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)

Dead from boredom at 26.

ILX, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)

Yes there is another thread on this but it's totally unrelated to what Fastnbulbous is talking about. He brings up some good points, for the other side of the coin, and I hope it stirs up some discussion. I just don't have time to get into it right now.

I'm glad Fastnbulbous doesn't know the history of this board (hell I barely know it) therefore he can go off a little bit easier that way plus I always like the long threads.

BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

i meant posts

BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

The main problem, is that Nick Southall knows absolutely fuck all about music. He should be writing about football, or wanking.

I tried not to make my criticism come off as personal, because it isn't. I'd hate to have what I write misconstrued as anything like the above, which is just really fucking infantile.

There's quite a few threads where people get emo about old albums, Fastnbulbous, to be honest though one person's story of fevered anticipation is going to be much the same as another's.

Who says the albums have to be old? A lot of people sent me stories when I first posted that, and they weren't the same at all.

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

Most of ILM has had similar experiences to Nick's ... my problem with what he wrote is the way it mythologizes the past ... if he's spending his days listening for another "In Sides" then he's wasting his time, not because nothing will ever top "In Sides", but because that album is nine years old and you'll never feel the same way about anything now as you did nine years ago. I felt that he put the past on too high of a pedestal, such that nothing from the present can possibly compete almost by definition. It's like "looking for the new Dylan" vs hearing an artist and comparing them to Dylan. In the first scenario, Dylan always wins, whereas in the second, Dylan is no longer an insurmountable obstacle.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

The problem with the "take a break" plan, F'n'B, is that for actual-proper-critics this isn't really a possibility -- the ones who've spent a couple years scraping their way to the point of being able to pay the rent with it aren't going to relish dropping out the process and then having to scrape back in again.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

It certainly wasn't an intention to be overly reverent to the past, but I guess it was an obvious and unavoidable side-affect, Barry. There certainly have been records over the last three years that have hit me with an intensity to that of, say In Sides. I'm not trying to replicate an experience, or even a feeling... just a... an intensity of different experience. I don't want listening to records to feel like homework, you know?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

time to go out like Barry Sanders, on top of your game

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

It's a shitty game if I'm on top of it.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

I listened to jazz repeatedly and read criticism about it until I knew how to listen, what to listen for, until I started to enjoy it, although I am far from knowledgeable about it. Given time and inclination you can make yourself “enjoy” almost anything, perhaps. Whether there is any point or not is the question.

So do you actually enjoy jazz, Nick, or just made it listenable for yourself?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

just wanted to say this is a great article. im jealous.

okok, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

Is what we're talking about is just "crisis of a critic"? If so, then I'm glad reviewing music isn't my job. It sounds like the writer got too consumed by appetite and not enough by what he was eating, a not-uncommon problem. I reckon it's worse when your job is to consume a lot.

But ignore me, I haven't listened to anything but Beatles < 1963 for days now...

Crunchy (aarana), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

So do you actually enjoy jazz, Nick, or just made it listenable for yourself?

You know, I don't know. I think so.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)

I've had a lot of bad experiences with tequila, yet I cant seem to get off ... oops did I totally misunderstand the whole subject of this thread?

Jibé, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

I hate tequila. Dodgy university experience...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

enjoyed the article. and this has got to be really common. maybe it makes people angry simply b/c they don't want to admit to natural negative human conditions. at any rate, i don't think one can ever pace it. or atleast that's never helped me, nor have i ever wanted to. its gotta be fucking hard for critics b/c of their job their tendencies are amplified and fed, but they're unallowed to go through these natural cycles related to obsessive behavior.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

as someone who's beginning to come out of the burnt-out phase, I can say that I'm glad I wasn't forced to write 2 reviews a week during the time I wasn't feeling it. Writing felt like "homework" for a few months before I stopped doing it regularly, and now, it just feels like a hobby (which is way better).

Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

So do you actually enjoy jazz, Nick, or just made it listenable for yourself?

You know, I don't know. I think so.

That sounds very sad, but I've been there. Well, not there exactly, more like going back and forth between periods of love and burnout/boredom.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

I can't understand the reverence people have for "In Sides". For me it's "Snivilisation" that I used to feel would never be topped. Guess it shows how it's all relative. Then again, I'm not a paid critic, so maybe I don't know my ass from a hole in the ground...

recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)

Am I right in imagining that Nick's in his early twenties? I'm getting longer in the tooth, and I've gone in phases for years: for months in a row I'll be consuming music like a bear readying for the winter at the stream, num num num num num more trout please, and then I'll just lose interest, and then something'll happen either personally or culturally and I'm off to the races again - why need this be a big deal? Aren't all interests/obsessions like this: mutable, in flux? I mean, if you're into feeling like it's an existential crisis for your tastes to shift, ok, cool, but haven't you gone in phases with other things: food, television series, film genres, colors, clothing styles?

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

Nick is 26 or 27, I think.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

...and when you turn one of your interests/obsessions into a job, it's not so easy to get out of it

Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

a lot of critics never really come out of the burnt-out phase and have long careers mailing it in on springsteen, dylan, u2, and, if they're really good, steve earle, lucinda, wilco, etc.

as has been pointed out here before, it's no coincidence that nick was about 18 when "in sides" came out.

dan (dan), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

I was 16, very nearly 17. I am now 26.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

Does Nick write for anyone other than Stylus? Does Stylus pay its writers?

polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

You don't have to talk about me as if I'm not here, you know.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

Hey Nick, do you write for anyone other than Stylus? Does Stylus pay its writers?

polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

Don't talk about Nick like he's not here!

recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

...and when you turn one of your interests/obsessions into a job, it's not so easy to get out of it

Dom, it is my job, and it's actually pretty easy to compartmentalize if you get aggressive about it: review stuff as though it were actually crossing a physical work-office desk (if you don't actually have an in-office Actual Like In The Movies desk), write about what you're assigned, beg off pleasure-listening for a while. Kinda weird at first but then pretty easy & worth doing.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

The problem with the "take a break" plan, F'n'B, is that for actual-proper-critics this isn't really a possibility -- the ones who've spent a couple years scraping their way to the point of being able to pay the rent with it aren't going to relish dropping out the process and then having to scrape back in again. -- nabisco

Well my suggestion wasn't necessarily to drop out of society for months or years and take up yak herding. I'm thinking more like taking a few days or a week off when needed. The proposed Dr. Fester's Retreat for Aesthetes would only take 2-5 days. Any takers?

Also, Nick, your article, which was enjoyable, sparked my response to all the critics throughout history who have failed us via burnout. Sorry to unload all that on you!

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

I always sort of preferred to write about music during burn out phases. It challenges your perceptions and forces you to really dig below the surface. Most of my reviewing gigs in the past were assigned, in which case you just put on the objective hat and listen with honest ears. I rarely got to review the records that set my world on fire, and when I did, I usually found I wasn't prepared to encapsulate them.

Those special records are better served by spending several months with them - then writing about them. Like if I reviewed my favorite records of the year so far within a week of first listen, I wouldn't have done them justice.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Tuesday, 20 September 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

Am I missing something, if I never ever heard 'In Sides', and I doubt I ever will?

zeus, Tuesday, 20 September 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

You know there's no part of your job description that says you HAVE to listen to every album in the universe. Here is a list of albums I haven't heard this year:

Sufjan Stevens - Illinois
Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - s/T
Orange Juice - Whatever The Fuck Their Album's Called
Girls Aloud - I Haven't Heard A Note From This Band

Be voracious, but be a human being sometimes


Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

Also, I've downloaded like two songs this year total.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

the problem is that nick and that article is bullshitting

maybe he should learn self-control huh

ps only a stylus faggot would download girls allowed

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

Hey Nick, do you write for anyone other than Stylus? Does Stylus pay its writers?

I wrote for Grooves for the last eighteen months or so but I've stopped now. I've done some PR work for a few bands that I know. Stylus doens't pay at the moment. I've made money off record labels and PR people but that's it.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 06:53 (twenty years ago)

only a stylus faggot would download girls allowed

Go jerk off Rambo-style to your limited Beefheart album.

nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

But rather than make an ass of myself and blabber in public that there's no good new music anymore (to be fair, this is not what Southall said [...]

riight.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 07:15 (twenty years ago)

ive sort of done something similar to whats described in the article - after i got y new pc, i began downloading billions of albums, many of which i own, some of which i dont, and i mostly seem to be listening to the ones i already own (but dont really know all that well). now ive got DL fatigue, i cant be bothered to download anymore, and i probably wont listen to half the stuff ive DL'd as of late either.

ookokoko, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 08:01 (twenty years ago)

the initial poster is basically anti-writing. he doesn't criticize the article, he says it shouldn't have been written. he is saying that certain experiences are in some way invalid, shouldn;t be communicated, however deeply felt.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)

Go jerk off Rambo-style to your limited Beefheart album.

what

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAH

~~~~ DODONGO DISLIKES SMOKE ~~~~ (ex machina), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 08:19 (twenty years ago)

Henry can you email me please? njsouthall at gmail dot com

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 08:33 (twenty years ago)

you know, i was just reading that post on blissblog regarding this issue. i had to forgo the edification of reading the original stylus article because i have yet to see anything on that site worth an investment of more than two minutes, but anyway. shows how informed i am on this issue. anyway, my point is this: simon reynolds opinion of a wealth of "pretty-good-to-almost-excellent" music available is, to me, a matter of misperception.

i really appreciate mr. reynolds' abilities as a writer and a critic of music. generation ecstasy was invaluable as a resource for mining the history of electronic music. i have yet to read his work on post-punk, but i'm sure it's fine reading. i think he is even responsible for spawning a crop of music critics with very similar style of expression, specifically the use of "all" as a sort of hyper-simile to describe the otherwise indescribable, ie "air liquide's 'tanz der lemminge 2' is all swirling vortices of nihilistic pixie dust pulsating with the very embodiment of all that is ethereal and effusive."

it's just that, right around the era of big beat, mr. reynolds really "jumped the shark". he seemed to embrace every emerging trend in electronic music with little critical regard. perhaps it was due to regret at having held off on the rave initially, or the much-commented on effects of the ecstasy he was using (no real basis for this claim, just a conjecture). anyway, i don't think that many people these days think that big-beat, speed garage, or 2-step were really genres with any lasting value...and i have to wonder about what mr. reynolds considers "pretty-good-to-almost-excellent" these days.

in my experience, there is a lot of great music available in the wide world of web, but most of what i'm digging for was released in the past. of course, musical history dictates that there is an immensity of incredible work from the past 30 years. music these days seems to be going through a bit of a fallow period. it's a bit like politics in that periods of rapid progress are generally followed by conservative times when all of the new ideas become assimilated into mainstream thought. of course while the mainstream is absorbed with ideas it considers new, but which have actually been gestating for quite a while, more radical approaches and paradigms are being conceived in the fringe realms. so while most music today is highly mediocre, the best stuff coming out is astonishing.

viborgu, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:08 (twenty years ago)

er, has there ever been a time when the latter didn't apply?

in answer to your question in para 2: currently grime, but he's going off it (ironically since on the evidence of the lethal bizzle album and the run the road 2 comp, it seems to be entering its post-punk phase).

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:11 (twenty years ago)

i still like big beat.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)

Go jerk off Rambo-style to your limited Beefheart album.

what

I just love real men.

nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:16 (twenty years ago)

anyway, i don't think that many people these days think that big-beat, speed garage, or 2-step were really genres with any lasting value

aside from the fact that I think all of those are great, and that I'm hardly alone in this, what "many people think" doesn't necessarily equal fact. also, liking three genres that bubbled around the same time doesn't necessarily equal liking everything indiscriminately--in the book Simon was pretty hard on a lot of stuff from the same era (IDM, trance, illbient-etc.).

i have to wonder about what mr. reynolds considers "pretty-good-to-almost-excellent" these days.

I read him saying this less like "hey, things are great!" than a "it's gotten so easy to make something 'good' that it's getting harder to pick out what's great," good-in-quotes meaning skillful and hitting the right buttons without necessarily going the extra mile. there are loads of "good" house records, but how many are exceptional? that's the core of his complaint about e.g. 2 Many DJ's--sure, it's a lot of fun, they do their thing really well, it's clever and smart and it can rock a party, but when that's all it is that skill feels sort of empty. that's something that's been consistent in his writing since the beginning.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:36 (twenty years ago)

Go jerk off Rambo-style to your limited Beefheart album.

Nathalie is my nu-god (again).

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 09:43 (twenty years ago)

Reynolds has always been like this, though. Even back in '87 he was moaning about the Shamen ("There's just no ROOM in my life for them at the moment!") apropos too many "good" groups/artists/records.

When's someone going to release the Saqqara Dogs stuff on CD?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 10:28 (twenty years ago)

Dom, it is my job, and it's actually pretty easy to compartmentalize if you get aggressive about it: review stuff as though it were actually crossing a physical work-office desk (if you don't actually have an in-office Actual Like In The Movies desk), write about what you're assigned, beg off pleasure-listening for a while. Kinda weird at first but then pretty easy & worth doing.

well, I don't really want to give up pleasure listening. I felt that I did it for years, and would rather beg off listening to stuff in which I have no emotional interest. (tho do agree that you have to review stuff as if it were a "work assignment" in order to get things done)

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

"in answer to your question in para 2: currently grime, but he's going off it (ironically since on the evidence of the lethal bizzle album and the run the road 2 comp, it seems to be entering its post-punk phase)."

i wish

regionalgrimeregulator, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

have you actually listened to either, or both?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:42 (twenty years ago)

u an becer bece nwver giung ti iverside!!!! in anything!!!

pete doherty, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:47 (twenty years ago)

Also, MP3s sound like teh shit.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:58 (twenty years ago)

yeah ive got both. if grime is punk, i dont really see those albums as being postpunk. id genuinely like to know why you think they are though. youre not going to compare the slower tracks on lethal's album to cabaret voltaire are you?!

regionalgrimeregulator, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 11:59 (twenty years ago)

I might let you know if someone pays me to write about it.

Cabaret Voltaire? I was thinking more of the isthmus between Earthling and early Butthole Surfers.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 12:20 (twenty years ago)

i dont think grime has had its post punk phase yet, or its post-grime phase, rather. no one is trying to really radically rework the template as such, its still continuing on the same axis it has been for the past 6 months or so, with a few new surprises along the way. and if it is post-punking itself, it def hasnt done that with the lethal b album, which is basically more of pow/no done over, and def not RTR2. if dizzee came out with BIDC now, it would still be a radical shift from whats going on in grime today. but thats not post grime.

regionalgrimeregulator, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

I've not heard anything like Plan B's "Sick 2 Def" in grime before, or indeed anything like it full stop since the good ol' days of SUAD's "Autobiography Of A Crackhead."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

plan b isnt a grime artist. hes just hooking on to grime cos it has a rep right now, and a buzz. his own solo singles sound like uk hip hop. theres actually several tracks on RTR2 which are by uk hip hop artists. plan b doesnt sound like most uk hip hop either, cos hes a folkie too. no idea what that song is doing on RTR2 to be quite honest.

okok, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)

there's a folk record on 'run the road 2'?

N_RQ, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

hey fastnbulbous you got Haruomi Hosono's cover of "Fujiyama Mama"?

tremendoid (tremendoid), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

Over the past year or so I've gone through a hardcore downloading binge. Excitement turned to concern when i realized i wasn't going to listen to much, and certainly not all, of what I was getting. Then I figured out what to tell myself: I'm making a time capsule that someday I'll go back to. And it'll be fun: "Oh what fucking shit. I can't believe i DL'd this." "So this is what everyone was talking about five years ago. Sure has(n't) held up."

jergins (jergins), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

I think I've only ever had good experiences with tequila.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

hey fastnbulbous you got Haruomi Hosono's cover of "Fujiyama Mama"?

Yes! Someone else wrote me about Hosono directly, and I'll post an expanded response here -- Funny that you mention Hosono -- I looked up where I first read about the albums, and it was issue 162 of The Wire from 1997, by Clive Bell. Good thing I'm a pack rat -- I still have that issue! It's sitting open on my couch as I speak (I'm at work right now though, so I haven't finished rereading it). If I can't find a digital version of it, I might write my own soon. It only took me 8 years to track the damn albums down! I remember thinking it sounded a lot like Discover America era Van Dyke Parks. And as I skimmed the beginning of the article, Hosono mentions how Parks produced one of the albums of his early 70s psychedelic band Happy End.

The albums are:

Tropical Dandy 1975
Bon Voyage Co. 1976
Paraiso 1978

The last one features the awesome cover of "Fujiyama Mama," and was credited to Haruomi Hosono and the Yellow Magic Band, a Beefheart reference. This evolved into the Yellow Magic Orchestra, which I recommend to anyone who would care to hear a whimsical Japanese Kraftwerk. When the mood strikes I'll dig for some of that Happy End. That's what slsk was originally meant for -- sharing hard to find music.

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)

this is a BIG article

regionalgrimeregulator, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

I think that grime now sounds like it's in it's punk phase and that it actually started in it's post-punk/no wave phase. Too much of RTR2 sounds like 21st C. oi.

"Sick 2 Def" reminded me of "Autobio of a Crackhead" as well (logically, as it's the only real precursor) but I don't think it's as good. It doesn't sound as precise in either the rap or gtr playing.

Not checked out the Lethal B but "isthmus between Earthling and early Butthole Surfers" means I'm gonna. Earthling are so underrated, one of the best ever 'always in the quid bin' groups.

Raw Patrick at Work, Wednesday, 21 September 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

xxpost I actually ordered Paraiso on CD last month from an import place but they informed me later the price went up and I didn't know if I wanted to pay that much without hearing the rest. I've heard and liked some Yellow Magic Orchestra but I only know Happy End from that (gorgeous gorgeous) song on the Lost in Translation soundtrack, didn't even know they were connected. When or wherever you might want to make F.Mama available let me know, thanks for the info.

tremendoid (tremendoid), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

I downloaded an old Isidro Infante song I never knew'd who it was buy so that made me happy to find out and I had even forgotten.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)

I loved Nick's feature; in fact, I've decided to try a new music-listening experiment as a result (which basically involves listening to fewer albums - very fucking innovative, I know).

If you want to read my long, rambling reaction to the article, go here.

Jack L., Wednesday, 21 September 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Hard for me to imagine this sort of burnout unless you write about music. Because then you're sort of *forced* to listen to a bunch of stuff you don't really like. Then again, maybe everyone is writing about music now.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 21 September 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

I think even people who aren't writing about music can still, if they move in certain circles, feel under an enormous amount of pressure to have heard things, to keep up. Just posting to ILM can make you feel that.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 22 September 2005 07:42 (twenty years ago)

I stopped blogging four months ago but I still feel under an odd kind of pressure to "start again," mainly because people keep emailing me and pestering me to do so, rather than because it's something I actually want to do, as opposed to something I deliberately gave up doing because it was, frankly, driving me towards a nervous breakdown. I mean, what's wrong with saying your piece and having done with it? These days I just want to enjoy listening to music for its own sake, rather than listening to it with a view to how I'm going to write about it.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 22 September 2005 08:17 (twenty years ago)

I feel a little late to the party here, but ... whatever. I liked that piece Nick and I recognise that feeling, something akin to nausea. I don't even have a computer that's capable of suporting downloading, but my flatmates used to be amazed at my lack of joy at the CDs and records arriving on the doorstep. I used to say they could open anything music shaped, because then they'd play it with enthusiasm and hopefully it would catch. Writing a particular batch of singles reviews felt horribly like homework (apparent to both me and the music editor I was submitting to). I stopped working and became stupidly broke (though this was probably, mostly, tied to lack of professional self-esteem). Then I started doing more stuff for womens' magazines. Now I care again. And it's fun. And I can be bothered spending my evenings checking out here-today-Dublin-Castle-tomorrow bands. But I felt a lot of me had gone missing when silence was massively preferable to music.

It's the endless chasing of the big new thing that's wearing. You can't discover just as a fan, by following a ball of twine from one artist to another. Everything must be new! Shiny! Digested! It's like being bulimic.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:00 (twenty years ago)

Of course, the thing is, being a failed music journalist, no one actually bothers to send me CDs or records anymore, so now I have to go out and buy the things again. In a way that kind of direct interaction rejuvenates your interest, because you've had to go out and physically find the music again. Also, as I said above, not worrying about having to write about what you listen to returns the music to something like its original value.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:06 (twenty years ago)

i got free records when i was a student, for about 9 months, and when it ended, so did my music mania (this ended the autumn of 'fight club' and i became a film writer and haven't looked back, much).

N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)

Do you still watch films? One of my mates works for a film magazine and says he can't face the idea of going to the cinema.

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:11 (twenty years ago)

i only write reviews occasionally, i've been tied up on Other Projects; i still watch a lot of films/dvds, yeah. not as many as a few years ago (my g/f would kill me), but my guilty secret is i like reading about music and films more than the things themselves.

N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:15 (twenty years ago)

maybe everyone is writing about music now.

thx to dl-ing, now everyone has access to a wide variety of music -- often for free. this position was once the exclusive preserve of writers (and other music-bizzers who got promo records). so now everyone gets to pick and choose from the vast sea of pop music releases, and can also feel the compulsion to keep up w/currents.

so in a sense, everyone's a potential critic now. whether or not that makes you a writer is a different question.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:20 (twenty years ago)

one of my friends is a weekly reviewer for a newspaper (not the main guy) and has to see *every fucking film* that comes out, ie as many as eight each week, kids' films, the lot -- and then he gets literally 2 sentences (not henry james sentences either) to write about them. they all go mad.

N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)

yeah, what a hard life.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:25 (twenty years ago)

It is actually, especially when you've got a day job as well. Trying to listen to 15-16 new CDs and write cogent reviews of each in the course of a single weekend (as I was doing at my Uncut peak) will end up driving you bonkers. QED.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:27 (twenty years ago)

i don't think i said it was a hard life, but obviously it takes talent, producing reactions to that amount of material.

N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 10:35 (twenty years ago)

my guilty secret is i like reading about music and films more than the things themselves

You see I get the idea that this is the case for a lot of people on ILM, and I just don't understand it at all.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 22 September 2005 11:08 (twenty years ago)

Good article, Nick. And while I understand that writer/critics can face a special type of burn-out, the same risk applies to non-scribe obsessives as well.

Keith C (lync0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 12:42 (twenty years ago)

These days I just want to enjoy listening to music for its own sake, rather than listening to it with a view to how I'm going to write about it.

The latter is how I usually listen to music now, which does bother me sometimes.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 22 September 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure most people saw this, but James "I was there" Murphy himself discusses the overload phenomenon at the very end of this Pitchfork interview. So it's not just a problem for critics, it's a problem for musicians as well.

Keith C (lync0), Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

it's kind of LCD's main shit, as a theme, isn't it?

N_RQ, Thursday, 22 September 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

If you know folks who've got advanced degrees in literary criticism, you'll often find that they can't be bothered to read fiction anymore. Where's an epidemiologist when you need one?

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 22 September 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

http://slowlisteningmovement.blogspot.com/2008/12/so-heres-deal.html

uk grime faggot (titchyschneiderMk2), Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:22 (seventeen years ago)

an excellent idea!

sleeve, Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:25 (seventeen years ago)

cool!

baaderonixx, Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:49 (seventeen years ago)

been de facto doing this for a couple years now

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:51 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, I've been following Matos on that closely this year.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:52 (seventeen years ago)

I think it's great stuff. I'm comfortable with my random overload way but it's nice to see this as a contrast.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:53 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

Hey Nick, what do you think of your initial Soulseeking installment almost 5 years later? How has your perspective changed, if at all?

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Saturday, 13 March 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

Hmmmm. Interesting question; it's not something I've really though about, to be honest, because there's been such radical change in my listening habits between then and now. I don't write anymore, for a start, and so have no impetus to keep abreast of new releases particularly.

The process from Soulseeking to Imperfect Sound Forever and then through to Stylus closing and my 'retirement' was really one of... refining my habits and the strategies I use to find new music. I've not used any kind of peer-to-peer network at all in 5 years. I bought a house and lost a big chunk of disposable income that would otherwise have gone on CDs, and I became pretty much just a casual fan again.

And I love it; these days I download stuff via a couple of avenues, close-nit networks of contacts who share interesting new stuff they're excited about, but I'm very discerning with what I download; I only get stuff I'm pretty sure I'll then go on and buy later anyway. It's very rare for me to not buy something on CD that I've downloaded and liked; this year I've not bought Hot Chip or Shearwater on CD, but if I saw Hot Chip for a fiver I probably would. I had no problem shelling out £10 on Pantha Du Prince or £12 on The Knife. I didn't mind only getting into Lindstrom this January instead of a couple of years ago; I've bought 3 albums by him since the turn of the year.

So I guess... I still think too much music and too little contact with it is bad, so I guess my perspective from that POV hasn't really changed. But obviously my entire position has; I've also just got a much better, much busier job, which I'm sure will change things by stopping me grabbing recommendations from here so much, for example, but it will also give me a bit more disposable income. Also my new boss is as much of a music geek as I am; he got the Four Tet album on vinyl and The Knife album on CD this week (he used to be the music editor at Big Issue Manchester), and I can see us geeking out about stuff together, which is cool, and will probably enthuse me about a load of stuff I might not have got interested in otherwise.

I still keep all the CDs we buy in any given new year in a separate pile, so I know to remember to listen to new stuff. It's nice to be able to keep visual track of it. This is this year's haul so far;

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4422112380_8977a279a5.jpgp

If I was still writing would it be bigger? Probably. Would I feel as happy with the pile as I do with this? Probably not.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 13 March 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Weird; that picture doesn't seem to be working. Here it is; http://www.flickr.com/photos/njsouthall/4422112380/

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 13 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

Four Tet
Polar Bear
Pantha du Prince
Spoon
??? (looks like Growing?)
Lindstrom and Christabelle
The Knife
Massive Attack
??? (no idea)
Delphic
Joanna Newsom

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Sunday, 14 March 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Just saw Owen Pallett in the picture tags, nevermind.

Still don't know what's on top of Delphic.

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Sunday, 14 March 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

I've been doing the 'Matos Method' for about 5 years now; first for financial reasons, now for sanity reasons.

musicfanatic, Sunday, 14 March 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

Fyfe Dangerfield.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 14 March 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.