The MINIMAL backlash

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So. Thoughts, feelings, discuss, eh eh what??

dj not as good as, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:33 (twenty years ago)

HI DERE

blunt (blunt), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)

http://www.michaelhong.com/gallery/albums/album03/aae.jpg

howell huser (chaki), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

hi

baby, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:50 (twenty years ago)

IFRAME SRC="http://video.freevideoblog.com/iPlayer.aspx?fileid=CD10D1C9-FEDD-405A-B2F8-DF7625AE5E08" WIDTH="470" HEIGHT="375" FRAMEBORDER="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" SCROLLING="no"

hi

baby, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
http://www.trustthedj.com/SKRUFFF/news_article.php?news_id=5002

The Hacker harasses 'quite boring' minimal DJs
02/02/2006

Electro-tech uber-producer Michel ‘The Hacker’ Amato branded minimal techno ‘the new electroclash’ this week and suggested that, like electroclash several years ago, the much-hyped genre could soon be struggling.

‘There are some good records out there of course, but now everybody is into it and what I find particularly surprising is that you’re finding hard techno DJs who are doing minimal stuff now as well as people from the commercial house scene,’ said Michel.

‘It just shows that minimal is a new fashion thing, that people think it’s cool to do be involved. It’s exactly the same as what happened with electroclash, three or four years ago; everybody was suddenly into electro from one day to the next. It’s the new thing, it’s everywhere, but then next year it will be something else that’s in fashion. We just have to wait and see which artists will remain.’

The French producer remains one of the highest profile artists to have emerged and prospered from electroclash, though confessed he loathes minimal so much he often hassles DJs, bombarding them with cheeky record requests.

‘I always go to the DJ booth, especially when I’m drunk, If I’m sober, or normal I don’t ask, but when I drunk I always ask the DJ to play different records if I don’t like what I’m hearing,’ Michel chuckled.

‘I remember being in a club with Vitalic a few years ago and we were totally drunk and there was some DJ, I can’t remember who, playing this very serious, intellectual minimal style and we thought it was very boring so we approached him and said ‘please play something interesting, play Daft Punk or Giorgio Moroder, whatever, play something funky’. I have to say the day after I felt a little guilty and thought I shouldn’t have done that but during the moment, it was very funny. Not for the DJ, but it was for us,’ he laughed.

‘I have to say I was in Berlin a few weeks ago and this music is everywhere, at every party everybody is playing the same thing and it’s quite boring; very boring,’ he continued, ‘Three hours of plip-plop, plip-plop is too much. I guess it must have something to do with the drugs. Minimal is very druggy music.’

The Hacker’s Traces EP (featuring remixes by Oxia, Dexter and a Black Strobe remix of Flesh & Bones) is out shortly on PIAS.

Yawn (Wintermute), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:17 (twenty years ago)

Yawn

adamrl (nordicskilla), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:24 (twenty years ago)

It's a load of bollocks but come on, what about THIS bit?

The Hacker’s Traces EP (featuring remixes by Oxia, Dexter and a Black Strobe remix of Flesh & Bones) is out shortly on PIAS.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:55 (twenty years ago)

If the Black Strobe mix of Flesh & Bone doesn't make small children cry I will be the most disappointed man in the world.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:56 (twenty years ago)

There are contexts where he's right but I like how he told those boring stories as if they were uproarious yarns of wild party hijinks.

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:12 (twenty years ago)

"One night we were drunk and - get this - we asked the DJ to put something else on."

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:13 (twenty years ago)

Obnoxious french goth rat in bitter job/edge-losing shock-a-shizzlePNATS. I sort of agree with him, is the worst part.

Not having a dead eighties horse to flog back to life rather desperately would make him more credible. Sorry but I don't think we'll be having that second electrosomething revival any time soon ! See you in 2020 for senior DJ novelty tours in janky suburban clubs.

Actually I now remember meeting Michel ages ago in that environment exactly.

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:19 (twenty years ago)

I sort of agree with him, is the worst part.

OTM

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:21 (twenty years ago)

whoa - chaki, i used to have a radio show there!!!! (on AM)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:24 (twenty years ago)

heavy metal dude's name ? he deserves 3 cheers

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:27 (twenty years ago)

I pretty much agree with the guy. Thing is, a boring dj is a boring dj, no matter what genre. Now that the minimal thing is pretty codified all the by-the-numbers jocks jump on and kind of dilute it's effect. Minimal jumping the horse right here: http://www.discogs.com/release/561488

tylero (tylero), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:30 (twenty years ago)

derrr s/horse/shark

tylero (tylero), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:31 (twenty years ago)

experimentalist horse jumping!

here is my WBRU story: Now's the time on ILX where we admit thinking TMBG were awesome in junior high

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:32 (twenty years ago)

I mean, classic or dud : posing for everyday pictures like they're future album covers. Classic.

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:32 (twenty years ago)

he is one of the dullest people on the planet.

notloggedin, Friday, 3 February 2006 00:32 (twenty years ago)

He's kind of forgetting to mention that electroclash was always gimmicky rubbish.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:36 (twenty years ago)

haha tylero, minimal jumped the shark much earlier: http://www.discogs.com/release/264776

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:44 (twenty years ago)

ha ha that cover

Lukas (lukas), Friday, 3 February 2006 00:52 (twenty years ago)

at a certain point i started to fell uncomfortable of the fact that i like minimal, when everyone "discovered" a "new fresh sound" that had been around for so damn long.
what now? switch to prog-neo-trance?

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:02 (twenty years ago)

Yup, sorry. Since you became a minimal fanboy you missed the acid/rock/rave sidetrack, slightly less dreary.

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:27 (twenty years ago)

i thought minimal existed before rave and acid

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:42 (twenty years ago)

I mean (like always) it's a good time to be bored with these trends and hunt for surprising records again, assembling playlists from tunes across not-so-different subgenres of techno, house etc.

xpost : you missed the acid/rave revival ? It WAS completely uncalled for I agree.

Al B. Dere (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:48 (twenty years ago)

i mean - there were just a few of us and then the "minimal fans" flooded mother earth.
i'm upset that i'm not unique anymore, dammit.

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 01:56 (twenty years ago)

yeah "-nique" seems to be a preoccupation

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 02:09 (twenty years ago)

true shark-jumping is the new misstress barbara mix, no joke (and no discogs link as of yet). argy, trentemoller, move d (?!), trentemoller, 2 eulberg remixes, donnacha costello, even alex under. i still haven't gotten up the gumption to put it on yet.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Friday, 3 February 2006 02:32 (twenty years ago)

I was backlashing against minimal until I read this:

‘Three hours of plip-plop, plip-plop is too much. I guess it must have something to do with the drugs. Minimal is very druggy music.’

Now I love it again! Faceless techno/it all sounds the same/you could only like this music on drugs = must be great!

Jacob (Jacob), Friday, 3 February 2006 02:35 (twenty years ago)

the first 30mins of the Marco Bailey CD is good.

i feel more comfortable in full clubs rather than empty clubs.

Good Dog (Good Dog), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:00 (twenty years ago)

but wait ... my animal instincts tell me that if "by-the-numbers jocks jump on" - by which tylero means "tragically uncool hard house / club house bods" - it'll be the best thing that could happen to minimal house!!

i mean, who would YOU rather have jump on the minimal house bandwagon - tribal america or planet mu? skam or subliminal?

or, to put it another way ... "jacques lu cont remixing COLDPLAY? GAH! SOUNDS LIKE DRECK!! i wish he'd work with someone credible, like sigur ros or tortoise ..."

vahid (vahid), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:22 (twenty years ago)

oh vahid no. don't invoke sigur ros like that, there'll be repercussions!!

rez one-bagger (haitch), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:34 (twenty years ago)

I agree with Vahid mostly - the Marco Bailey comp actually looks good. My main concern is that the difference between hard loop techno types getting into minimal and IDM types getting into minimal may be (in strict sonic terms) rather neglible - the result might be somewhat stentorian either way.

Better for Jacques Lu Cont HIMSELF to start making minimal epics (oh wait! He does! sorta)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:36 (twenty years ago)

best case = more trad-house grist for the trentemoller / tiefschwarz mill

vahid (vahid), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:50 (twenty years ago)

who will be the minimal-house mylo?

vahid (vahid), Friday, 3 February 2006 03:51 (twenty years ago)

what do you mean?

tremendoid (tremendoid), Friday, 3 February 2006 04:10 (twenty years ago)

press, radio play

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 04:14 (twenty years ago)

I hope it's a girl

blunt (blunt), Friday, 3 February 2006 04:17 (twenty years ago)

confession: i dont really understand what minimal is. and isnt everyone up in the air about electrohouse anyway? and dont they all end up getting played together anyway?

my favourite plip-plop records of the last year or so

sven brede - brave
swat squad - escoria
argy - love dose

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:05 (twenty years ago)

the 'drugs' thing makes me laugh. they used to say that about maximalist trance didnt they, oh, all those breakdowns, its for people on drugs

now they say, "oh all those no-breakdowns, its for people on drugs'

i heard a rumour they used to say the same about paul whiteman in 1921

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:07 (twenty years ago)

apropros of nothing. does anyone have a ysi of frank de wulf - tapes. im kind of convinced that loads of things at the moment sound like that, but im not sure if its the track im thinking of

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:08 (twenty years ago)

I still don;t quite get what this thread is about, is it about clicky techno, like say, Pheek and Unfoundsound and the M_Nus label and all that stuff?

Jena (JenaP), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:10 (twenty years ago)

i dont know!

im not sure anyone does;)

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:18 (twenty years ago)

Well, at least I know what to say if I ever see The Hacker DJing anywhere.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 3 February 2006 08:40 (twenty years ago)

Dance music cycles through trends as much as (if not more than) any other general music genre. This reminds me of an Andrea Parker interview I read in DJ Magazine last year. She was whining about how there aren't any "real electro-heads" anymore and how the whole scene is/was now rubbish, which is funny because I'm sure purist electro-heads were saying the same about her when she dropped the very commercial Kiss My Arp.

That no-one-cares-about-me-anymore pill is a tough one to swallow.....

Giles Manius (jsoulja), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:02 (twenty years ago)

someone tell me abt trentemoller. i have a rmx of his that came out of a big pile of shit i torrented one night ("electro punk hitlist" vols 10 - fuck knows what. no idea who put it together, either, mostly garbage). anyway, it ruled. discogs doesn't say much.

geoff (gcannon), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:28 (twenty years ago)

Sharon Phillips - Want 2 Need 2 (Trentemoller remix)

geoff (gcannon), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:29 (twenty years ago)

He's danish, late 20s, used to be a rock producer, got into dance a few years back. His own productions are minimal-ish k house, his remixes are big breakdown-filled electrohouse stompers. He was very popular last year.

Jacob (Jacob), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:37 (twenty years ago)

The hacker should come out to New Zealand, it takes years for musical trends to reach here and his favoured electro style is still very big... We've yet to hit the minimal boom (and possibly never will) let alone the backlash!

Bn1 (Bn1), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:42 (twenty years ago)

but wait ... my animal instincts tell me that if "by-the-numbers jocks jump on" - by which tylero means "tragically uncool hard house / club house bods" - it'll be the best thing that could happen to minimal house!!

i mean, who would YOU rather have jump on the minimal house bandwagon - tribal america or planet mu? skam or subliminal?

Believe me, I'd be first first first in line to see say, Bad Boy Bill do a minimal set, but these guys (bailey, liebing, mistress, et.al.) are a pretty different group. Those 'prole-house' guys (subliminal etc) have ideas, and bring their own fresh material to the table, while those inbetweeners are pretty much just technicians who put out incremental tweakings of the formula once it's codified. Their material can sometimes be decent filler for the mix though, but once they're onto something, get ready for a glut of really average stuff.

Also I don't now who skam or planet mu are.

tylero (tylero), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:48 (twenty years ago)

Geoff check out the Trentemoller mixes of Yoshi's "Do What You Do" and Royksopp's "What Else Is There?". In terms of stuff most like the Sharon Phillips mix.. perhaps try "Beta Boy"? That's probably the most fun and good-natured of his electroish tracks.

Actually if his own productions weren't so increasingly furrow-browed I'd say that Trentemoller would be a potential minimal Mylo - or at least a minimal Freeform Five?

Dominik Eulberg = the minimal Tiefschwarz.
Ricardo Villalobos = the minimal Black Strobe

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 09:50 (twenty years ago)

Trentemoller is releasing a full length later this year that is supposedly (he said so himself) quite different from his singles and remixes. Featuring Richard Davies on vocals on a few tracks. Something to look forward to, methinks!

willem -- (willem), Friday, 3 February 2006 10:21 (twenty years ago)

what style did Marco Bailey play before he cottoned on to minimal techno?

Good Dog (Good Dog), Friday, 3 February 2006 10:22 (twenty years ago)

What's interesting about Trentemøller for me is that he's another of these progressive-friendly minimal (but not really minimal) artists, and one that I quite enjoy - see also James Holden, Damien Lazrus.

Search out the track 'Rykketid' which is the B-Side of the Physical Fraction EP on Audiomatique Recordings which has a quality 'old-school techno' riff, and a super-cheesy breakdown with an extremly rushy build up.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 3 February 2006 11:56 (twenty years ago)

marco bailey played banging techno.

there has definitely been a massive leap onto the minimal bandwagon all over. i get a few demo cds handed to me every week. last year they were all (bad) electrohouse and now they all seem to be (bad) minimal. the interesting thing is that it's the same kids who have now gone minimal. i just hope it doesn't go the way of what happened to techno back in the day when every producer seemed to jump on the jeff mills banging loop techno tip. that was pretty much the nail in the coffin of that type of techno as far as creativity went.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 12:00 (twenty years ago)

So was the demo I sent you (bad) electro or (bad) minimal? I like to think I'm ahead of the curve and it's (bad) maximal....

(you do mean bad as in good, right???) haha.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 3 February 2006 12:08 (twenty years ago)

yes, bad is an olde scottish word meaning 'wicked, mate!'

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 12:18 (twenty years ago)

well i would agree with the hacker except for 2 things:

a) i find the hackers music deeply derivative, and neither interesting nor funky, so for me hiswitty comments apply to himself

b) i dont find minimal house/techno boring yet. i might do, then i will agree with the hacker. but i love it still, and the last weekend at watergate, with a eulberg, alex under and triple r (surely the uber generic minimal line up, potentially) was unbelievably fun.

ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 3 February 2006 13:56 (twenty years ago)

‘I remember being in a club with Vitalic a few years ago and we were totally drunk and there was some DJ, I can’t remember who, playing this very serious, intellectual minimal style and we thought it was very boring so we approached him and said ‘please play something interesting, play Daft Punk or Giorgio Moroder, whatever, play something funky’. I have to say the day after I felt a little guilty and thought I shouldn’t have done that but during the moment, it was very funny. Not for the DJ, but it was for us,’ he laughed.

I remember once when I was really drunk I kicked a wall on the way home - no-one saw, although I felt guilty for possibly waking someone up, but still, at the time, it was an incredible high.

ratty, Friday, 3 February 2006 14:07 (twenty years ago)

That is unfuckingbelievable, the Hacker of all people talking about dead scenes. Hello Goodlife and Italo Techno and hell the whole fucking italo revival, everyone of those guys probably needs to be dissing minimal in order to get a column inch, with the exception of Vitalic, tho he could have seriously done with releasing that record 2 years earlier.

Furthermore the whole idea of "minimal" is so gigantically open to different interpretations, MANDY sets are totally different to Richie Hawtin ones and yet everyone calls it minimal.

I can definitely see the huge swing towards minimal, people at work now ask for minimal just as much if not more than "electrohouse", but the fact is it doesn't worry me or bother me.

The whole "plip plop" thing is also way way smaller a part of minimal than is made out by detractors, at least as far as I can see, I sometimes wonder who actually plays that stuff, cos no club I've ever played at would go for it, I'm talking the super dry minimal stuff, I guess Richie Hawtin or someone gets away with it.

There is alot of "minimal" which is just leaner, smarter, melodic house or techno.

That no-one-cares-about-me-anymore pill is a tough one to swallow.....

Absolutely OTM.

Who will be the minimal Mylo

Probably Mylo! He'll release a second album ripping off everyone with goofy aplomb.


Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 15:18 (twenty years ago)

Just listening to Achso for the first time at the moment and so I can't help but think it's a little early for a minimal backlash while records as amazing as this are being made.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 3 February 2006 15:48 (twenty years ago)

confession: i dont really understand what minimal is.

minimal is when not too much is going on at any given moment, hehe

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 15:52 (twenty years ago)

you mean, ALL DANCE MUSIC?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)

I mean that's another wtf about when people criticise minimal, it's like "No I want my dance music flabby and with superfluous beats!".

I don't mean that all non Perlon music sucks, just that the ethic at work in "minimal" is a very worthy one. Though mostly I reckon when people mock minimal they mean the super dry stuff.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:01 (twenty years ago)

well my friend says, "trance is the hardest-to-make dance music cuz there's so much going on at any moment", so i recon we can exclude at least trance

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:04 (twenty years ago)

the vastest area for mockery then is IDM, cuz it makes even less sense than any mega-super-extra-dry minimal

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:06 (twenty years ago)

Well I like the "dry stuff" and IDM, but not trance. We're not in goa and it's not the early 90s, there really is no need.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:08 (twenty years ago)

(the trance stuff was a joke of course)

i mean, if people want to mock dry minimal stuff i suggest there's much more possibilities to mock idm.... i like both idm and minimal, and i had soooooo many people laughing at me cuz i listen to this shapeless weird brain-and-ears-twisting stuff, that's what i mean ::)

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Ironically of course minimal producers such as Trentemoller and especially-especially-especially Eulberg mostly make tracks where a lot of stuff is going on at any given moment - i mean, who else in dance music is making stuff as dense and complex as the big Eulberg mixes? Not The Hacker!

("dense" and "complex" not being automatic positive qualities obv, I'm just noting the divorce between the discourse and the reality)

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:33 (twenty years ago)

I can't help but feel asking "where's the fun" is the last refuge of a drowning dance producer. When has overt fun and humour ever been a necessary part of music!

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)

Well to be fair "Flesh & Bones" was a good track, whatever version i heard out that one time was awesomely ominous and shivery (I could imagine it was a very very early Black Strobe remix airing, but i think this is a stretch). But if I remember correctly that mix-cd that The Hacker put out a few years ago was hardly a barrell of laughs so he really shouldn't be talking! I guess generally speaking electroclash and electro-house sets may have tended to have more variety and light and shade than the more "purist" minimal sets (see Loco Dice, Richie Hawtin etc?)... I must say that (and though I like the Loco Dice Mixmag mix etc.) I do get the impression that the use of vocals appears to be diminishing, which I think is a shame in basically any genre of music.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:44 (twenty years ago)

oh yes there're minimal people of different breed, like eulberg, maybe metope, etc. they're minimal in a different way. i don't know how to say that in one sentence.

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:48 (twenty years ago)

I'm not so sure about the use of vocals thing, perhaps. Sometimes I think we are in the midst of a slow but subtle re-evaluation of and return to techno? I think the word is ripe for re-use, though maybe there are still techno heads lurking sullenly.

Don't know if anyone else feels the same but to me there are alot of electrohouse tracks now that aren't quite minimal but are still very dark and tracky. I sort of include the Border Community type stuff in this too. I dunno, it doesn't necessarily feel like house.

When was the last big electro (pop) house anthem? "Zdarlight" I guess but so many of the crossover hits are actually kind of deeper anthems now. I mean compared to say 2004 last year was seriously devoid of that kind of poppy electrohouse. Not a bad thing necessarily in my opinion, it just seems weird that the scene has gone even more underground just when it appeared to be about to go overground again.

As much as I love Blackstrobe I am finding it hard to see how they're going to re-enter things as they stand at the moment, they seem to have done a Vitalic a little bit, maybe they just didn't have the material.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:52 (twenty years ago)

if you people werent so afraid to use the word "TECHNO", youd know what to call this "different breed"!! haha xpost

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Nique, I wasn't attacking yr description, I think most people would describe it that way.

James Holden is another example where "minimal" sounds almost right, but there's certainly a ridiculous surfeit of stuff going on in the tracks.

I agree with the notion that everything seems more aligned with techno than it was. Actually I think we've both been saying this for a while, it's the Mathew Jonson Effect innit.

I think there can be some surprising back-and-forths and reversals though, look at the way that the Metro Area influence just drifts around the scene from one place to another - just as it disappears entirely from Get Physical releases, "Cosmic Sandwich" blows up. So Black Strobe might find themselves suddenly central again with a minimal amount of adjustment (ha ha i said minimal).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:58 (twenty years ago)

TECHNO TECHNO TECHNO!!!!

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:01 (twenty years ago)

see, that wasnt so hard.

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:03 (twenty years ago)

Yawn you're being too kind - obv the real word is PROG PROG PROG!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)

for border community, maybe!

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)

I sort of think for all of it! "Mandarine Girl" is such a prog record in the best possible sense. And a lot of this music generally reminds me of Guerilla Records stuff or The Drum Club with better production values and less hippy references.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)

I think the Border Community style is only just beginning to permeate other stuff and become interesting.

I guess to be fair alot of this "techno" is still kind of at a house tempo, I mean it just seems there is real attention to detail and measured releases of the madness/hard aspects of techno, and there probably are still alot of records being played that are house.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Yeah it's still house to me because of the tempo. But then by people's increasingly restrictive definition of house (no saxaphone, no credibility) I guess Chicago House should retrospectively be renamed Techno.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:24 (twenty years ago)

This is where it gets kind of weird though! I don't really think of Detroit techno as techno?

Can we all just assume we mean awful 90s loop shit when we say techno.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:26 (twenty years ago)

What about the good 90s loop shit though Ronan (I'm thinking circa mid-90s)?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:44 (twenty years ago)

For me with detroit techno it depends on the programming - most of that stuff and the stuff which followed in the UK (LFO, Orbital etc.) i think of as techno because it doesn't have the disco-style beat but is more jittery. But if the same stuff came out now I might think it was house? I dunno!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:47 (twenty years ago)

the two biggest records for me this year so far have both been by carl craig so i'd just like to say - (properTECHNO IS BACK! but yes ronan. normally (sadly) i think of techno as awful 90s loop shit.

as for mylo, he has lost his hearing so won't be making much of anything for a while.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:48 (twenty years ago)

hmmmm. html formatting disaster on that last post.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)

it just seems there is real attention to detail and measured releases of the madness/hard aspects of techno

i think its a problem that the attention to detail has shifted from the djs to the producers - id rather have psychedelic effects created on the fly by, say, putting backwards vocals on top of slowed-down picotto tools* than hear the same tricks from the same records every weekend (but then i guess canned ket-ness is better than djs playing endless tribal loops as is)

* see any Ostgut set from around 2002 for reference

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:49 (twenty years ago)

Mylo deaf? Perhaps my atheism was somewhat premature.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:50 (twenty years ago)

i personally think that every one who switches from one genre to another at the very time that the latter one is getting popular is very LAME

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:51 (twenty years ago)

agreed. super lame! but hasn't it always been the way?

i think (and hope) his deafness is temporary.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:52 (twenty years ago)

except when they are better at it than everyone else! wasnt Oliver Lieb a trance producer before he started his Maschine label? xpost

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:53 (twenty years ago)

oliver lieb started off as an ebm producer then made a few euro techno tunes before going trancetastic. but even then, most techno djs played his lsg records.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:55 (twenty years ago)

thank god, i was going to have a heart attack at the news

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 17:58 (twenty years ago)

I can't bring myself to buy that Rui Da Silva tune.

Though now that I think of it that's partly cos it's not very good anyhow. I guess I mean I couldn't bring myself to listen to it.

I'm sure there's some good bandwagon jumping, though some of it is definitely annoying, like say Beyer/Liebing playing electrohouse, no thanks guys, or those awful attempts by US house guys to go electrohouse, changing their production name to JOHN COMPUTER or MR CASH REGISTER MACHINE

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:03 (twenty years ago)

when i played TRESOR 222 release i thought i don't like techno - for the 1st time in my life.

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:07 (twenty years ago)

Sorry to cut-and-paste somewhat out of context, but:

I don't really think of Detroit techno as techno?
I don't really think of Detroit techno as techno?
I don't really think of Detroit techno as techno?
I don't really think of Detroit techno as techno?

!

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:10 (twenty years ago)

I know it looks ridiculous, I guess to rephrase, I don't really think of alot of what people I know call techno as a direct continuation of Detroit Techno, though I know that's quite selective. Obviously there is alot of harder more loop based Detroit Techno.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:14 (twenty years ago)

maybe there are still techno heads lurking sullenly

HI DERE:)

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:26 (twenty years ago)

the lsg stuff was played by lots of people, i think. i didnt like it that much, i do respect Lieb though, for...

psylocibin - delicate substance, on, wait for it...DELERIUM! of all labels

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:28 (twenty years ago)

hawtin and villalobos are techno to me, and all this talk of them being house is just psuedo-'rehabilitation', for people scared to use the t word ;D

mind you, electrowelt soopertrack is TRANCE, and i wont listen to anyone who says otherwise

anyway, i read an article in the daily mirror which suggested that these are all moot points, as the post-rave diaspora are reuniting for simon reynolds birthday

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:31 (twenty years ago)

Yeah Ronan, I pretty much knew what you trying to say but it just looks so strange to see that phrase in print!

When has Hawtin ever been labelled "house"?

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)

ah yes, i think i meant, this talk of them being 'minimal', whats wrong with them just being techno. i suppose it is so people do not mistake them for jeff mills?

what kind of a crazy world is it when people want to distance themselves from jeff mills!

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:42 (twenty years ago)

i think i understand it now

there is minimal, and then there is also minimal. there are two types of dj, but the records they play are often on the same label, pokerflat and such

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:45 (twenty years ago)

maybe one day, the post-minimal diaspora can reunited, perhaps for simons next birthday?

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:45 (twenty years ago)

what kind of a crazy world it is when people want to be like jeff mills!

x post

stirmonster (stirmonster), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:46 (twenty years ago)

ack, jeffs great though!

im listening to more Swat Squad at the moment, i think this is the best plip-plop music yet

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:49 (twenty years ago)

xpost, in the crazy word of good techno? at least technique-wise, i mean even old softie Superpitcher turns into a lightning-fast spider-fingery dj machine when he launches into one of his rare techno phases, although the results obviously sounds quite different from Mills

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:55 (twenty years ago)

*world, *sound, hrm

Yawn (Wintermute), Friday, 3 February 2006 18:56 (twenty years ago)

old softie Superpitcher turns into a lightning-fast spider-fingery dj machine

ha hahaha, esp. when he drinks too much vodka, as was the case in moscow

nique (nique), Friday, 3 February 2006 20:42 (twenty years ago)

my fave plip plop remains bold - "readymade"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:03 (twenty years ago)

the people i know who like this call it all techno, i think cos they dont like the word "house"

ambrose (ambrose), Saturday, 4 February 2006 13:35 (twenty years ago)

there's not one mention of tech-house in this thread! (at least explicitly)

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 17:46 (twenty years ago)

There is now!

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Saturday, 4 February 2006 17:47 (twenty years ago)

:) there was a tech-house backlash too IIRC. i think usage of the word minimal makes sense for labelling a genre that's really hard to pin down. it seems like it's easier to define it in terms of what it is not that what it is. at the same time the word minimal is useless if you're trying to describe this music to anyone who isn't already an acolyte. i usually say that i like the more esoteric or less commercial variants of techno or house and if that doesn't cause the person's eyes to glaze over, i go into more detail about artists or countries of origin.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 18:15 (twenty years ago)

i thought sasha's fundacion ny mix and his embrace of ableton was the canonical big overground/jumping the shark moment. the comment on the page i link to is pretty interesting...there was a lot of negativity about the release from some ilxors too.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 18:27 (twenty years ago)

"tech house" makes me think of shit middle of the road music!

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:21 (twenty years ago)

"tech house" = "it's house, but don't worry, no pianos"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:50 (twenty years ago)

Hehe, I laughed.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:53 (twenty years ago)

I see a lot of what people would define as minimal (the more maximal Pokerflat stuff, for instance) as a continuation of tech house - much of it sounds like stuff that Plastic City were putting out in the late 90s.

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:54 (twenty years ago)

Hahaha, Tracer OTM.

Tech house, in my more paranoid moments, always seemed like a way of tricking house fans into liking/playing techno. Or vice versa. I'm not sure which. IOW, what Tracer said vs "it's techno, but it's kinda mellow and you won't hear a 303".

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:55 (twenty years ago)

Sounds better that way

blunt (blunt), Saturday, 4 February 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)

and minimal makes you think of...? (xpost to ronan) i agree with paulhw.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:08 (twenty years ago)

haha, minimal makes me think of horses falling down stairs.

I dunno, I think I've closed the door on me liking "plip plop" minimal forever, I love the melodic stuff, though I think the midpoint between the two is when things really start to suck.

About "tech-house", I just mean most people just say "electrohouse" when they mean the new stuff, and when someone asks me for tech-house they want Layo and Bushwacka or Josh Wink or something, like isn't tech-house in the old sense just for DJs who find house too gay and poppy and techno too purist and militant? Just smacks of middlebrow, though of course I'm only working on a definition of tech-house from my time, 2001 or thereabouts to the present, so maybe I'm prejudiced in that regard.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:14 (twenty years ago)

i have never heard any great electroclash music. i'm sure some exists. i really missed that boat. everything i heard was very not great.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:14 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, Ronan, some key differences (and why people got into tech house, beyond ideas of cringeing at house / scared of techno):

The deep, heavy bassline. The return of acid (deep house at the time hated it). Marching snares. And textured synth lines that techno had forgotten.

Also, it's hard to remember how bad most techno was in the late 90s - the aggressive over-fast looped stuff was really bad. Tech house slowed it down, added structure, and moved the focus from pointlessly aggressive cut-up DJing (for every Dave Clarke, there were 1000 bad eggs). As for Naked Music or Om style house - even your dad thought it was boring.

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:22 (twenty years ago)

horses falling down the stairs = clip clop? the new pantytec on perlon is pretty clip clop, but it has clarinet and brass samples which i think is kind of hot. it's raw and it grooves which to me is the saving grace when the music starts to get overly glitchy and micro-edit-happy.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:24 (twenty years ago)

x-post Yeah I possibly got the tail end of it, it also seems really American for some reason.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:25 (twenty years ago)

The deep, heavy bassline. The return of acid (deep house at the time hated it). Marching snares. And textured synth lines that techno had forgotten.

this also reads a lot like a description of current get physical tunes.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:27 (twenty years ago)

Scott, search (although as Ronan once pointed out it's really one of the first big electro-house tracks) Freeform Five - Perspex Sex (Ewan Pearson Remix).

I sympathise with Ronan's position w/r/t tech-house - although the irony is that a lot of what we both like most in current "minimal" stuff is basically tech-house (only done good). I do like some "proper" tech-house though, especially the really dubwise stuff like Jeff Bennett (who's done stuff for Pokerflat, yeah). I don't really go for the stuff which sounds like techno loops slowed down and softened up, with no development or build from the beginning of the track to the end - not that I demand musicality or artistry as such, but I don't think I've ever really been into "dj tools" in any dance music sub-genre (with harder faster techno you'll occasionally get sets which are so well done you forget you're listening to dj tools, but the emphasis here is on "forget". This might well also be possible with tech-house dj tools sets, but I haven't come across any great examples).

Layo & Bushwacka circa their first album were actually really great, although I'd argue they were more breakbeat than tech-house really. In fact they were sort of marked out by the unusual extent to which the better tracks took unexpected twists and turns.

x-post - yeah Get Physical is basically tech-house with an electro-synth tinge, but again, as per the use of dub in e.g. Bennett, this simple addition really prevents the music from seeming like an overly straightforward techno/house middle ground.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:28 (twenty years ago)

I totally agree that electrohouse basically is tech-house, I guess it's just a semantics thing, I think (tho maybe I shouldn't) "uh-oh!" when someone asks me for some tech-house records at work. I mean maybe it's just a case of not calling Get Physical etc tech-house because it's got a few different influences thrown in, with rock music probably one of the biggest ones. (btw my big record at the moment is Zombie Nation's "Money Talks", has such a disco/post-punkfeel to it without any guitars or actual riffs, something about the way everything intersects, also love the Tim Paris tune on Marketing that I blogged about for the same reason

Is stuff like Andrew Weatherall's Live at the Social Tech-House, in the older definition? I

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:36 (twenty years ago)

My definition is the same as yours (2000-1 onward) ... I don't think of electrohouse as tech-house though, those words are completely distinct in my mind (partly self-enforced, since the former is a million times better than the latter).

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:41 (twenty years ago)

Probably a key example in all of this is to compare mix disks from Slam, once the quintessential tech house purveyors:

Past Lessons Future Theories (2000)

1. Healer [House Mix] - Bushwacka!
2. Jesus Loves 2000 - Eric Davenport, Hipp-E
3. Riddem Control - Hipp-E
4. Compound - Slam
5. Fever - Valentino Kanzyani
6. Sound Called House
7. Can U Feel Tha Funk - Freelance Science
8. Voices of Africa - Umek
9. Tribe Cut - Samuel L. Session
10. Dirge [Slam Mix] - Death in Vegas
11. How's Your Evening So Far?` - Lil' Louis, Josh Wink
12. Stand - Stacey Pullen
13. Look Ans See [DJ Zank Mix] - DJ Rush
14. Moment - Mark Broom
15. 1999 - Gaetano Parisio
16. Positive Education - Slam
17. Jaguar [Mad Mike String Mix]

Whereas this is their latest "Nightdrive" (1995):

1. Carl Craig Darkness
2. Luciano “Octogonal”
3. Slam “Genex”
4. Alex Smoke “Don't See The Point”
5. Dominik Eulberg “Rotbauchunken” (ROBAG WRUHME´S - Bombina Bumm Remix)
6. Nathan Fake “Dinamo” (Dominik Eulberg – Dinamo Remix)
7. Slam feat. Tyrone Palmer “This World” (Wighnomy Brothers and Robag Wruhme Remix) – A capella
8. Luci “Mullet Is In Da House”
9. Luci “Mullet Is In Da House”
10. Marc Houle “Demor”
11. Slam “Kill The Pain” (Marc Houle Vocal Mix)
12. Slam “Kill The Pain” a cappella
13. Guido Schneider and Andre Galuzzi
14. Dub Kult “On and On”
15. Perc “Splashy” (Original Mix)
16. Marc O’Tool “Gear 1”
17. Mathias Schaffhäuser “Coincidance” (Trentemoller Remix)
18. John Spring “Strange” (John Springs 2005 Revision)
19. Lee Van Dowski & Tsack “Asem”
20. Black Strobe “Nazi Trance Fuck Off!” (remixed by James Holden)

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:42 (twenty years ago)

erm, latest is 2005. Sometimes I think I'm stuck in the mid 90s.

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:43 (twenty years ago)

Oh Jesus, Ronan, you're right. Here's the sole user review on Amazon for Slam's Fabric mix:

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

that's the real stuff, May 6, 2003
Reviewer: pierrotunited (Paris, FRANCE) - See all my reviews
Brillant mix! If you like powerful house (Tech house) this mix is for you! Before I bought the cd ,I just checked the track listing and wow! what a selection! Afro deep, O.C.B., Ladytron, Marco Bailey,Sven Vath(Marco Carola Remix). No silly sampled trumpets like sounds,No chicks singing: "dance to the beat baby" or "salsa style house" cd! Just plain pulsating house with hard working Stuart Mc Millan & Orde Meikle on the decks. These guys have been doing this for more than 12 years and you can tell!....

Was this review helpful to you? (Report this)

paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:50 (twenty years ago)

i think the weatherall mix to pick for tech-house would be hypercity if only because the mix and the tunes are so clinical. it seems like tech-house was not responsible for lots of great tunes, but it was one of the catalysts for what is known as minimal and electro-house today.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:53 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, electroclash surely still the biggest catalyst?

I mean in the sense that the pop/trance/80s infusion seems to be the really big jolt that gave life to the monster?

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:55 (twenty years ago)

yup, totally agree.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:56 (twenty years ago)

somewhere along the line tracks became songs again.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:58 (twenty years ago)

I think of the Wearherall Live @ the Social as being spacey deep house actually, although yeah definitions are v. porous and ultimately meaningless whatevs (before someone jumps in an points this out).

"somewhere along the line tracks became songs again. "

This is most key I think - maybe the hesitation in calling stuff techno is that, detroit aside, techno hasn't been songful in a long long time. Whereas with the current german/minimal/whatveer sound even the instrumental tracks are much more structured, melodic, progressive in the sense of internal progression, starting at one point and moving to another. Again, no automatic value judgment should be implied (or applied) here.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 5 February 2006 04:30 (twenty years ago)

Probably a key example in all of this is to compare mix disks from Slam, once the quintessential tech house purveyors:

Past Lessons Future Theories (2000)

i think that was possibly the most pretentious title for a mix cd ever. i thought it was so ridiculous at the time that we plastered glasgow with a poster that said 'Past Blunders Future Cock Ups'. i don't think slam have ever forgiven me.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Sunday, 5 February 2006 05:53 (twenty years ago)

Whatever, I still love listening to it. But it's part of the whole minmal aesthetic for me, it's the same with art and design, and non-dance music.

New Electroclash is pretty harsh though. I've never given a shit about The Hacker anyways.

Tokyo Ghost Stories (Tokyo Ghost Stories), Sunday, 5 February 2006 05:56 (twenty years ago)

theo parrish is tech-house u r all european

james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 5 February 2006 05:58 (twenty years ago)

i was gonna say (major xposts) that if you need to know "what's tech-house" you should just look at the soma compilations, volumes 1-8.

i think since they've changed the name from "soma compilation volume x" to "soma compilation 200x" they've gone really shitty.

in this case, i don't think it makes sense to posit any sort of continuity between tech-house and electro-house based on what slam are up to, it'd mean more if the same stable of core artists (common factor, envoy, percy x, silicone soul, funk'd'void) were making electrohouse tracks but slam as label-heads have really shifted their vision towards the continent

(or maybe they've just been swayed by ewan pearson's success and are letting his music dictate the direction of the label?)

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 5 February 2006 06:06 (twenty years ago)

paging theo parrish

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 5 February 2006 06:07 (twenty years ago)

slam as label-heads have really shifted their vision towards the continent

i think they shift their vision to whatever the latest bandwagon is. but usually about two years late.

loggedoutmonster, Sunday, 5 February 2006 06:11 (twenty years ago)

i gotta check that shit out tomorrow at work

james van der beek (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 5 February 2006 06:11 (twenty years ago)

"(or maybe they've just been swayed by ewan pearson's success and are letting his music dictate the direction of the label?) "

hole in one.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 5 February 2006 11:12 (twenty years ago)

loggedout more otm I'm afraid. very very few of the releases sound like Ewan Pearson, more's the pity. It's all techy minimal stuff now but I can't remember liking a single one except the Hystereo tunes and maybe the Swayzak remix of Slam's "Human". And we get every Soma release.

How many of the below are like Pearson? None for my money.

SOMA 160 Hystereo with Automatic & Silk Gonna Love You (12")
SOMA 161 Alex Smoke Chicca Wappa (12")
SOMA 162 Silicone Soul Les Nocturnes (12")
SOMA 162P Silicone Soul Les Nocturnes (12")
SOMA 163 Various Soma Classics Volume 1 (12")
SOMA 164 Slam Soma Dubs Vol. 3 (12")
SOMA 165 Alex Smoke Don't See The Point (12")
SOMA 166 Vector Lovers Computrfnk EP (12")
SOMA 166 CD PROMO Vector Lovers Computrfnk (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 167 Silicone Soul Feeling Blue (12")
SOMA 167 CD PROMO Silicone Soul Feeling Blue (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 167R Silicone Soul Feeling Blue (Remixes) (12")
SOMA 168 Slam Bright Lights Fading (12")
SOMA 168 CD PROMO Slam Bright Lights Fading (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 169 Funk D'Void & Phil Kieran Lost In Belfast / Black Worm (12")
SOMA 170 Alex Smoke Brian's Lung (12")
SOMA 170 CD PROMO Alex Smoke Brian's Lung (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 171 Vector Lovers Boulevard (12")
SOMA 171 CD PROMO Vector Lovers Boulevard (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 172 Silicone Soul Soma Dubs Vol. 5 (12")
SOMA 173 Silicone Soul The Poisoner's Diary (12")
SOMA 173R Silicone Soul The Poisoner's Diary (Ewan Pearson Mixes) (12")
SOMA 174 Alex Smoke OK (12")
SOMA 175 Hystereo Validity Revision (12")
SOMA 176 Various Soma Dubs Vol. 4 (12")
SOMA 176 CD PROMO Various Soma Dubs Vol. 4 (CD5")
SOMA 177 Various Soma Classics Volume 2 (12")
SOMA 178 Slam / Dove Soma Classics Volume 3 (12")
SOMA 179 Silicone Soul Under A Werewolf Moon (12")
SOMA 180 Slam Kill The Pain (Marc Houle Remixes) (12")
SOMA 181 Hystereo Let's Do It (12")
SOMA 181 CD PROMO Hystereo Let's Do It (CD5")
SOMA 182 Vector Lovers Microtron (12")
SOMA 182 CD PROMO Vector Lovers Microtron (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 183 Repeat Repeat Bounce Your Body To The Box (12")
SOMA 184 Alex Smoke Lost In Sound (12")
SOMA 185 Silicone Soul Inferno (12")
SOMA 185 CD PROMO Silicone Soul Inferno (Promo) (CD5")
SOMA 186 Slam Human (12")
SOMA 187 Repeat Repeat Blippy (12")
SOMA 188 Funk D'Void & Phil Kieran White Lice (12")
Soma 189 Vector Lovers Post Arctic Industries (12")

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 5 February 2006 11:58 (twenty years ago)

Who will rep for these awful tunes records!

(the Lee Van Dowski mix of that White Lice tune is ok and Alex Smoke fair enough)

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 5 February 2006 12:00 (twenty years ago)

tunes or records

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 5 February 2006 12:06 (twenty years ago)

i'm not repping for anything soma post-2003, except maybe tony thomas.

these are prob ok:

SOMA 176 Various Soma Dubs Vol. 4 (12")
SOMA 176 CD PROMO Various Soma Dubs Vol. 4 (CD5")
SOMA 177 Various Soma Classics Volume 2 (12")
SOMA 178 Slam / Dove Soma Classics Volume 3 (12"

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 5 February 2006 18:15 (twenty years ago)

i always liked the term tech-house. to me it always meant house melodicism and tempo combined with a decidedly electronic sound pallette... basically all of the middleground between hard, loopy techno and newly-authenticity-obsessed deep house. to all the people i knew a few years back who considered themselves tech-house djs, the term meant that they could play force tracks and poker flat and m_nus but also chain reaction, early guidance from chicago, maybe a bit of relief/cajual, too. perlon, bpitch playhouse ect were also important, but, at least as far as i can remember, in 2001 there werent so many records out of germany (more in terms of distro than anything else) that one could play those tracks exclusively, and, pre-electrohouse, those tracks mixed in better with, say, a casey hogan or kenneth graham record.

tech-house does also mean a very specific group of english and american producers who made boring, anal stuff, but there are some good records from that period that i still play. they are not anthemic records by any means, but still very functional.

i love that the balance has tipped back towards songs, but i feel less creative as a dj because so many of the tracks i get nowadays, unless they are really minimal, arent generally built for long mixes, and certainly not for re-edits. that is where my oler records come in handy. i can use all of that tracky stuff as a bridge. you dont know how good "each and everyone (blinhouse)" sounds until you've mixed it in from some weird early playhouse or perlon percussion workout.

as for minimal and "backlash", hasnt this stuff been around forever now? dan bell, plastikman, rob hood, some of the model 500 stuff with maurizio, chain reaction, ifach/trelik... but also some mood II swing, the first YMC record (Last Stop EP), certain Svek releases, Convextion, Jeff Samuel, Aril Brikha... as much as the soundsets and processing has changed over the last couple of years, there are still plenty of twelves from 99 even that sound contemporary (and plenty that dont, of course).

i think that hyper-sub-genre-ification is really useful as a critical and discussional tool and i certainly believe that what has happened in the last few years is teriibly exciting (part of why i love this music so much is that its still possible to argue that whetever month you are in is one of the best ones for techno ever!) but i feel like taxonomical segregations have social effects, too. djs who only play new stuff from one single family of labels suck. people who wont come see each other play because of miniscule musical differences suck.

as far as i can tell, backlash in electronic music only starts happening after djs begin to try to cash in on the "new sound". since they have little knowledge of it, they cant offer a compelling performance. and those blinders do start to affect the sound, crowd etc. I started off buying moslty deep house but it started to bother me that the whole acid/jack element was being lost, but now that i have met a lot of other djs, i can understand why. i actually know house djs who play out regularly who HADN'T HEARD of TRAX or ACID until the SOUL JAZZ compilation was released.

this post meanders. its nice to post again though.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 20:08 (twenty years ago)

http://www.discogs.com/image/R-1426-001.jpg

i always thought of that as sort of the OPPOSITE of minimal.. i.e. lush, swirly, crammed with sounds. but more than that, lacking the kind of self-consciousness that good miminal tracks always evoke.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 5 February 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)

or USED to invoke, before minimal "got physical" with bpitch, kompakt, etc

anyway, i used to have dave angel up on my wall, like that - to me, it was the future!!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 5 February 2006 20:38 (twenty years ago)

unless we are talking about ultra-ultra minimal stuff, most of the "minimal" records coming out now are fairly lush, swirly, etc, arent they?
please explain the self-consiousness part. are you saying that tech-house is more traditionally regular old pumpin' dancefloor stuff? i think that that applies, actually to mostly the british stuff from 97-01 or so... all of those dreary records on End Recordings that all sounded the same.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 20:49 (twenty years ago)

xpost obv.

my point is...
this record
http://www.discogs.com/release/2147
and this
http://www.discogs.com/release/432496
arent necessarily that far away conceptually, and look what genre the first is listed under ;-)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 20:53 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i mean tech-house was maximalist in a way even the most-crammed full microhouse/minimal isn't today, yet somehow it felt less sweated-over as far as time sitting behind the computer making it all sound perfect. tech-house sounded "live" in a way few micro-minimal tracks do to me these days (some dated exceptions like tok-tok and kitbuilders excluded, even though they're more like proper techno anyway). it's funny how easily confusing it gets, talking about this stuff. it's like everyone has their own private definitions. i, for instance, don't think anything can really be called "minimal" anymore, because "minimal" came up as a term at a time when it meant something relative to the configuration of other genres. now that the configuration's changed, new records coming out in the same vein need a new name to better identify where they sit in relation to everything else (and they've got it - microhouse, or plip plop or whatever)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:00 (twenty years ago)

i dont know why microhouse stopped being used? i always liked minimal house, too. there is a great mix at http://djsets.hyperreal.org by James Bucknell from 2000. he used to have it on his website and it was listed under minimal house.

i just tell people i play house music because fuck it, most of my records are 120-130 and have basslines. if you say techno, people think you are going to empty their club playing a drumcode record as a warm-up to another one.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:08 (twenty years ago)

as for minimal and "backlash", hasnt this stuff been around forever now? dan bell, plastikman, rob hood, some of the model 500 stuff with maurizio, chain reaction, ifach/trelik...

You'd be surprised (or maybe not) at the levels of fury invoked in some people by comparing THAT kind of minimal, to Perlon/Kompakt/nu-micro-k-house-techno-plip-plop minimal.

I should confess to starting this thread out of curiosity after some heavy roffling whilst browsing the purist-inclined discogs forums. I didn't know some people HATED this kind of stuff already (see also: 'electro(nu-prog)-house').

i actually know house djs who play out regularly who HADN'T HEARD of TRAX or ACID until the SOUL JAZZ compilation was released.

:(

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)

You'd be surprised (or maybe not) at the levels of fury invoked in some people by comparing THAT kind of minimal, to Perlon/Kompakt/nu-micro-k-house-techno-plip-plop minimal.

those people clearly know not what they are saying.

baby ford / ifach records for perlon. chain reaction was total k-music. dan bell is the godfather and well, i'll leave rob hood out as i find most of his work really dull.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I mean I'm hardly that knowledgable anyway by ILM standards, but I was quite amazed that fans of fairly uncommercial 'minimal' techno/house would be able to sweepingly dismiss, and erect brick walls between music that was pioneering and new THEN (when they were younger), and contemporary descendents (yet with differences, not "equivalents" or "weak imitations" which seems to miss the point entirely) of that music NOW.

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:38 (twenty years ago)

I was kind of pondering Richie Hawtin's role at the weekend in bridging the gaps between both camps... The last two DE9 mixes seem to exist as a place where both camps can find some kind of equilibrium, which he seems to bring into practice by removing some of the housiness and amping up the techno-nerd factor and I'm not really sure where I'm going with this.

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:45 (twenty years ago)

xpost
im curious as to the nature of that fury. please explain.

i think i understand it to the extent that the original detroit stuff was mostly black-made, had a social and even political value to the original creators, but i dont see how listening to superpitcher is somehow a betrayal of principles. i cant just be a race thing. anyways, i thought it was all about good tracks. if everyone in detroit was worried about not being underground or political for listening to prince or abc then where would techno be?

i generally dont get all of the people who feel they have to "represent" at all times.

that being said, if any of these guys want to send me mint copies of everything on ifach, eevolute, accelerate and 7th city, I promise I will sell all of my perlon and kompakt.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 21:46 (twenty years ago)

aaron is here again:)

it sad about rob hood, but maybe stirmonster is right. tranquilizer was good though!

terry lennox. (gareth), Sunday, 5 February 2006 22:52 (twenty years ago)

hell yes gareth!

i still like the minimal nation 2x12 on m-plant but internal empire has not dated as well.


Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 23:03 (twenty years ago)

Old UR, Nighttime World vol.1 on Cheap, the Drama series, The Pace and a handful of M-Plant twelve inches still do the do.

blunt (blunt), Sunday, 5 February 2006 23:13 (twenty years ago)

no love for duet?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Sunday, 5 February 2006 23:14 (twenty years ago)

yes, and for The Vision on Metroplex, Axis and Hardwax ! Hood doesn't particularly deserve to be lashed in the back.

blunt (blunt), Monday, 6 February 2006 00:23 (twenty years ago)

'nighttime world vol. 1' was great actually, but that's mainly because he deviated from the repetition and added gorgeous melodies. 'tranquilizer' is good too as was almost everything he did with UR. i guess my problem with him stems from too many nights hearing other djs completely fry my head by doing two hour 'minimal nation' / 'internal empire' sets. his floorplan releases which were more house than techno rocked my world at one point too.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Monday, 6 February 2006 05:21 (twenty years ago)

wow, the hairsplitting ;) I agree with whoever said that micro-classification is a useful critical tool although it does get overwhelming at times.

when I was buying a lot of what I thought of as "minimal techno" about 5 years ago, it was basically represented by the Clicks And Cuts compilations - Brinkmann, Voigt, Pan Sonic, Delay, Farben, Raster-Noton, Basic Channel et al. Not stuff that was really geared towards a dance floor for the most part, although I love it. I don't really keep up with this stuff but I guess I'm impressed that it took five years for a backlash.

sleeve (sleeve), Monday, 6 February 2006 05:33 (twenty years ago)

i liked hood's "art of war" peacefrog album a lot, particularly "wrath meditation" and "memo from thunder". the 2nd one, "wire to wire", not so much. he doesn't do so great w/ digital synthesis, i think.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 6 February 2006 05:58 (twenty years ago)

this is making me think of that paul hazel tune i cant remember the name of

terry lennox. (gareth), Monday, 6 February 2006 09:22 (twenty years ago)

minimal techno lists?

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Monday, 6 February 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)

im curious as to the nature of that fury. please explain.

i can explain. cuz i have been a 'victim' of this fury.

people who a furious about things like this are those who are generally dissapointed that "the world is not the same as it used to be, the water is not that wet as it used to be, etc." so, those who got stuck in the (comparatively) early stage of the scene and are not willing to accept and come to like anything new.

this is the real reason.

the reason that they claim is real is kinda vague, like "THAT stuff was rich and inspired, and THIS new stuff is made "like in 5 minutes per track just to earn a quick buck cuz it's popular at the moment""
no evidence on both points, though.

how do they know how many minutes is spent on each and every track - i have no idea. nor have i read any decent, mathematically proved explanation of this 'fury'. when they ran out of arguments they just told me, well, who are you to argue with us? and i thought, indeed. ha ha.

nique (nique), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 01:48 (twenty years ago)

i call it tech house cos whatever the associations that has to dance music fans, to those not au fait with dance music (ie 99.9999999% of people i nkow or meet) it implies the tempo of house, the funkiness, the danciness of it, with the sounds, the feel, the palette of techno. its a pretty neat word i reckon. i remember being intrigued by tech house on flyers in about 2000 although not knowing what it was, and layo and bushwacka, or even buckfunk 3000 seem to be the names that sprang up then. maybe thats why now everyones mixing breaks with minimal stuff, a hangover from then

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:11 (twenty years ago)

It's time we reclaimed the term tech-house! So many negative connotations.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:53 (twenty years ago)

Speaking of tech house, what do people think of the Wiggle crowd who probably did more than most in creating the genre? Terry Francis, Eddie Richards, Nathan Coles etc. It's hardly ground-breaking music for sure, but it's very propulsive, straight-up party music, and with just the right amount of wierdness to keep it from getting too functional.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 13:22 (twenty years ago)

i never liked all that stuff, but i probably didnt hear much of it, and switched off

juno calls trapez minimal/tech-house. it also called faimont's gazebo progressive house. i'm not sure about all this;)

terry lennox. (gareth), Tuesday, 7 February 2006 13:46 (twenty years ago)

Gazebo is totally prog.

Jacob (Jacob), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 01:30 (twenty years ago)

Anyway, onto serious matters, shouldn't the thread title be:

THE minimal BACKLASH

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 10:24 (twenty years ago)

Juno is very fast and loose with genre.

http://decks.de is the best, they call everything techno and then within that they give it a few descriptions or just one description, so it's like "minimal, electro", or just "minimal". Works pretty well.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 10:47 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, prob is there's not a good record to be found on it, ha ha

blunt (blunt), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 11:52 (twenty years ago)

um, you know, outside techno for sure

blunt (blunt), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 11:53 (twenty years ago)

Not minimal, but going back to the Wiggle stuff, I just downloaded a Nathan Coles set here:

http://www.elevationproductions.net/downloads/02_nathan_coles-phab_phridays_20051202.mp3

It's quite good.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 18:37 (twenty years ago)

i agree with aaron grossman's initial post, and not just because he happened to give me props.

jeff samuel, Wednesday, 15 February 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)

thanks jeff! i dont play out that much but "new joob" is in my bag every single time i do.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 16 February 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/features/themonthin/techno/02-15-06.shtml

ooops. false alarm!

worst iPod case scenario (fandango), Thursday, 16 February 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

What is Phil's definition of "minimal", I'd like to know just to understand the piece better.

Like does he mean everything from Pokerflat to Perlon to Get Physical, etc etc?

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

he did say he couldnt identify single tracks.

the current definition on german music boards is: if it goes "plip-plop", its minimal. everyones read the Hacker piece, and it seems to be the great unifier, for better or worse.

Yawn (Wintermute), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:32 (nineteen years ago)

it's weird though, is pokerflat minimal, get physical I guess isn't, but maybe sometimes is.

it's pretty confusing.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)

xpost When he said he didn't recognise tracks I got the impression he meant he hadn't heard them, not that they were all so plip-plop he couldn't distinguish between them.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

it's definitely confusing, and i'd say it absolutely depends on who you talk to. hell, for me, it would depend what day you ask me. but i think in general, plenty of electrohouse could fall under minimal; plenty of nu acid; plenty of "straight" house and techno, probably. honestly, i don't think it's a very good term - none of the current minimal (or very little of it) actually engages with minimalism as a subject itself, which would seem to be a differentiating factor w/ much classic minimal. minimal was once a project, of sorts, or at least a creative strategy; now for better or for worse it's a style. i don't mean that perjoratively; it's just that the context has changed. (same happened to punk, which in its inception was "minimal" in a different sense.)

and jimnaseum is right - as in, i heard tons of things i'd never ever heard before. and will probably never hear again. i'm astounded by how MANY records, many quite good, if a bit undifferentiated, are coming out right now, w/ an industry supposedly in decline.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

I kind of approach the definition "minimal" on a sliding scale, like temperature. Some things are really minimal, some are kinda minimal, a bit like how the sun is really fucking hot and my bath water is lukewarm.

Incidentally I really liked that article, it has more or less been the final straw that has clinched my decision to append a Berlin trip to this year's schedule along with the annual Barcelona visit.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)

I'm going to be cool and move there. Once it's too late and "not like the old days".

Jacob (Jacob), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:41 (nineteen years ago)

Haha that piece is great.

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 02:07 (nineteen years ago)

Philip's I mean. In Berlin Germany, hamburger eats you etc.

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)

Hey Mr Sherburne

Whatever happened to your month in techno columns about 2005 one-off?

And everyone - what are the most interesting labels at the moment?

telegram sam, Friday, 17 February 2006 07:03 (nineteen years ago)

Many kinds of music sound good on drugs, and once you've heard them that way, they often continue to sound good when not on drugs. It's just conditioning.

Mattri, Friday, 17 February 2006 07:19 (nineteen years ago)

i think things are really great now, i'm not ready for a minimal backlash;)

i never know anything i hear at the moment, and its actually quite a great feeling, everything merges into one, it just seems like 'everything' is good. its one of the things i love best about great dj sets, often the best sets ive seen have been where i don't know anyhing, and couldn't really tell you anything about it afterwards

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 17 February 2006 11:12 (nineteen years ago)

OTM

this is what i felt when i went to watergate in berlin.

ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 17 February 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

Many kinds of music sound good on drugs, and once you've heard them that way, they often continue to sound good when not on drugs. It's just conditioning.

Ouch. So OTM it hurts!

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 17 February 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)

If I'm right to interpret this as an attack on minimal I'd have to refute it. I've heard plenty of music played while I've been out and mad with it that I'd never like to hear again. Also I first got exposed to minimal through listening to it in my house, there are no minimal nights where I'm from so I've only very rarely listened to it while out and pilled up, i.e. only when I'm I've gone travelling. I'm sure there are a lot of people who go to minimal club nights more for the long hours and drugs than the music, but you get that in every music scene (go to a local indie-rock show, how many people are just there to get drunk and pose and not actually watch the bands?).

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 17 February 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

ive never heard it on drugs and im obsessed with it and listen to it 24/7 so i wonder if ti could be any better on drugs

ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)

minimal techno is not as druggy as some other dance musics though. It strikes me as rather refined and civilised. Someone cleverer than me ought to make a heirarchy of drugginess to genre.

Good Dog (Good Dog), Friday, 17 February 2006 14:10 (nineteen years ago)

im hoping that it is better on drugs then i might persuade all these people i know that do drugs but dont like dance music to get into it.

what i dont get is that its like "K house" etc etc, but from what i knw *warning extreme ignorance follows* ket kinda spaces you out, slows you down or something. i get how that works with hawtin doing mathew jonson tunes tha tgo on for 3 hours, but whats the link between ketamine and eulberg clattering/disjointed horse-falling etc etc? where does the wig out "ooh it sounds so weird that i can ditch IDM and start to like this cos its experimental" thing mesh with doing ketamine?

ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 17 February 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)

all i know about k is doing mistakenly new years eve 2004 at a party in whitechapel, and it really hit after the pills wore off a bit, and someone put new model army(!) on, and it sounded like onions. but ive never heard new model army, i just know they wore crusty jackets, oh wait, maybe it was that 51st state of america song, anyway, this was after loads of dance music all night, so it was kind of weird, but i had to reacgh into the back of my brain to work out what was happening, and it sounded like onions, then i folded up the room and put it in my pocket and my arm was 8 ft long and there was a tiny can of beer on the end that was surprisingly easy to move

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

but, yes, to the slowed down kind of thing, i felt very coherent and rational about the fact that i considered myself insane. it wasnt very pleasant, but it wasnt awful either

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

I'm sure there are a lot of people who go to minimal club nights more for the long hours and drugs than the music

isnt this actually a good thing about a scene?

i like that loads of people go just to have fun, and don't care about who underground resistance are, and what they mean. they're part of things to me, and i think they're great for atmosphere and for making things fun.

dont you love, about the best nights, where all kinds of strange people crop up through the night, that you meet?

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 17 February 2006 17:00 (nineteen years ago)

My takeaway from Philip's article: "damn I can't wait to hear those new Guido Schneider tracks!"

jeffery (jeffery), Friday, 17 February 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

xpost: I wasn't saying there was anything wrong with people being more into minimal for the drugs and the fun than the music - I love drugs and fun! I was just defending minimal from one of the previous posts that seemed to insinuate that it was only enjoyable accompanied with narcotics.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 17 February 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

clattering/disjointed horse-falling

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 17 February 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

it sounded like onions

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 17 February 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

jeffery: yeah, that's about right. i can't fucking wait to get my hands on them.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Friday, 17 February 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

gareth otm. without the floating voters we are nothing.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 17 February 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

When I hear "minimal" I think snd's "makesndcassette" or early Sahko 12"s, i.e. records that radiate a kind of spiritual/aesthetic stance of anorexia towards the pleasure provided by "real music". Stuff that makes you feel almost cheated, like "is that all you're going to do?". When I first heard snd it just sounded so fresh and modern and cheeky in its reductionist thin-ness, and really aggressively so, it was so minimal as to come across like a big "FUCK YOU" to the very possibility of pleasure. Then I hear these Villalobos tracks and they're great but they're quite busy and sprawling- lots of offcentered snare clacks and multi-tracked ebow-ed guitar (on the "Achso" EP) and such- i.e. this is pretty baroque stuff to get called "minimal". An obvious point I guess, scenes are going to emerge and they're going to call themselves something and in this case it's "minimal". But if records as busy as these are getting called boring and triggering a backlash from some quarters, that seems pretty much premature- i.e. I'm guessing these backlashers don't actually know just how "boring" boring music can get.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not sure who these 'backlashers' are - I don't think I've ever actually heard someone talk about the music like this. Either on ILM or in real life (where most house fans I know either never liked it in the first place or still like it). Was this the thread that started after I said I was 'embittered against small drums' or something? It would be weird if my random statement was taken as a backlash because 1) I certainly don't represent yr ave. minimal house fan 2) I never intended it as a statement to imply a general trend within the german techno axis (which seems as creative as ever), more my own personal weariness with the german aesthetic, or at least how tired i was with the way its engaged with here in Chicago. A couple shows when the right artist rolls through town, mid-20s fashionistas at the shows, sometimes lots of dancing and fun but on the whole a pretty restrained, underground scene. These guys are popular here but they're not packing them in. And meanwhile Chicago is full of clubs that play non-minimal house that people I grew up w are more likely to be into and check out, that DJs I know are more likely to enjoy, you know, shit that is actually a local culture of sorts w some form of grassroots support. And lately I've been more involved with listening to that stuff, and as a result found myself distanced from minimal german.

So if there are some backlashers and I missed them somewhere, point them out and ignore my post!

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

(Also related to this was that Get Physical's 2nd Anniversary sound was so much more interesting to me, and their drums sound fat and fantastic)

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

On the other hand, there's the side of 'minimal' that churns out highly-produced tracks that sound amazing when you first hear them, but make it impossible to remember once the track is over. Pling-plong tracks on Karat, M_nus, and artists like Pheek, Troy Pierce and more recently Gaiser and Crosson have that effect on me. I have a hard time regarding these records as minimal, the term to me implies a more austere quality, a 'more with less' aesthetics, more in line with what Drew is referring to.

Jena (JenaP), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

(xp to myself obviously there's the anecdote that bumped this thread initially but that seems easily dismissable as 15minutefame biterness)

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

Deej- I definitely was not referring to you when I was talking about the backlash phenomenon- I was referring to the Hacker's comments. Just to clarify . . .

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Friday, 17 February 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

Oh I figured you didn't mean me, I don't mean to imply my stature is so large around here - I just recall this thread being made right after I made some post on that old thread. And I was wondering other than the bitter old dj who we're referring to as far as backlash.

deej.. (deej..), Friday, 17 February 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

do people in germany actually go out and dance on k, because for me it's nigh on impossible?

rio natsume, Friday, 17 February 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

people in europe don't actually dance. they "dance".

vahid (vahid), Friday, 17 February 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)

people in europe don't actually dance. they "close their eyes and dream of looking out the window onto dancing fields of wheat."

lf (lfam), Saturday, 18 February 2006 07:32 (nineteen years ago)

people in europe don't actually dance. they "dance".

Quite "funny" I guess ;-)

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Saturday, 18 February 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)

yes, we have special "vibes" that no american can ever hope to recreate. and we call those vibes "laissez-faire drug policy" ;D

Yawn (Wintermute), Saturday, 18 February 2006 13:30 (nineteen years ago)

seriously though, ive never seen anyone take k. even nitrous oxide and salvia are more popular. if this is a mass phenomenon, its the most hush-hush mass phenomenon ever.

Yawn (Wintermute), Saturday, 18 February 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

my understanding of k is that it is a dissociative that would make dancing, or any coordinated movement, impossible. maybe it's different when you blow it.

lf (lfam), Saturday, 18 February 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

The people I've seen on the dancefloor who took ketamine were literally . . . on the floor, usually with long strings of drool hanging out of their mouths, with their heads sinking into their laps. Often in a fetal clump, by the bassbin. Not pretty.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Saturday, 18 February 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

k=
http://www.privateone.us/NotPretty.jpg

lf (lfam), Sunday, 19 February 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

People who dance to minimal techno only take drugs in homeopathic doses

telegram sam, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
262eWqptzVcyKw fvQeI7Ic4pax 4rfF0wTMQMy3d8

ulI8BXxwh3, Sunday, 12 March 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

paul hazel

Mr Adolph bin Streisand (Mr_Adolph_bin_Streisand), Monday, 13 March 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

i'm calling you out, windex

lf (lfam), Monday, 13 March 2006 07:37 (nineteen years ago)

I'm feeling like having a minimal backlash against Trentemoller for his crappy answers to my e-mail interview questions.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 13 March 2006 08:00 (nineteen years ago)

I'm feeling like having a minimal backlash against Trentemoller for his crappy answers to my e-mail interview questions.

Haha. I caught Trentemøller on Saturday: he was cheesy as fuck, playing riffs such as 'Seven Nation Army', 'Smoke on the Water' and 'White Lines/Cavern' on a keyboard while his "perfomance partner' DJ T.O.M. mixed loops from his records behind him. Really diverse crowd came down to catch him, and they all lapped it up. I have to admit I wasn't feeling it as much as most, but he kept me entertained.

There are some videos of the night on a Brighton website, here:

http://www.brightonfusion.co.uk/?cmd=articles_body.php&id=tm0306

If anyone's interested we have a Kompakt allnighter down in Brighton this Saturday featuring DJ Koze DJing and The Modernist playing an all new live set. Should be a really good night.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Monday, 13 March 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

We as in Brighton, rather than me putting on the night.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Monday, 13 March 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
Hows about Min Techno as being a new style of Techno try not to compare it with Trends.With new technology comes forth new music.Techno will continue to reinvent it self for the better or worse depending on who you ask.Instead of bashing it except it ive been playing this shit for about 6 years cus all the older loopy techno records got boring they all started to sound the same.Some so called min records are doing the same again.In all generes there is good production and shity production.Long live Techno and fuck the haters.
DJ SAINTGEORGE WILLIAMSBURG BROOKLYN NYC

ST.GEORGE BROOKLYN NYC, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)

well said sir!

fez (fez), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)

fez are you fezaffe?

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

or fe zaffe?

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

dont tell anyone!!

fez (fez), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

http://img335.imageshack.us/img335/1368/haters3ma.jpg

lf (lfam), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
ITEM DETAILS FOR:
THE HACKER - A.N.D. N.O.W...

The second mix from The Hacker is a predictably electro-based affair that nonetheless manages to throw up a selection of welcome surprises, with Grenoble's digital botherer raiding his crates and pulling out the likes of Sleep Archive, Model 500 and Ellen Allien. Evidently having spent some time getting intimate with the more minimal end of his collection, as Sleep Archive's 'Elephant Island' and Mount Sims 'Restless' prove, whilst for those who prefer things more chrome-plated The Hackers own 'Flesh & Bone' and hardboiled blast of Model 500's 'Techno Music' will keep you grinning. Tracklisting; 1. Notstandskomitee - Uhrwerkwelt (Tape Version) 2. Miss Yetti - Could I Kill You 3. Liasons Dangereuses - Los Ninos Del Parque 4. Sleeparchive - Elephant Island 5. Revolving Eyes - Space Model 6. Ellen Allen - Brain Is Lost 7. The Emperor Machine - Bloody Hell 8. Model 500 - Techno Music 9. Luke Eargoggle - A2 10. Perspects - Strap 11. The Hacker - Flesh&Bone 12. Front 242 - No Shuffle 13. Kiko & Gino'S - Odyssey 14. Gto - Pure (Battle Of The Bass Mix) 15. The Hacker - Link 1 16. Mount Sims - Restless

fandango (fandango), Friday, 14 July 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, hackerpaws.

Though to be fair, that is only two tracks.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Friday, 14 July 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

unfair is more fun ;)

fandango (fandango), Friday, 14 July 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.bitunfair.com/images/bg.jpg

trees (treesessplode), Friday, 14 July 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

'restless' isnt so minimal!

ferzaffe (flezaffe), Friday, 14 July 2006 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

damn you boomkat!

fandango (fandango), Friday, 14 July 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
10 Rules Of Being A Minimal Hipster.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

that list is sooo 2005

ferzaffe (flezaffe), Sunday, 6 August 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

what a bitter british list

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 6 August 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

"come to Berlin with no plan"

leave with no money :D

I feel ripped off, I never saw Magda once! :(

fandango (fandango), Sunday, 6 August 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNGLpKKt3uo

This video should blast away that silly British list, it is everything dance music is about in 1.30.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 6 August 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

That list reads like a big bushel of:

http://www.readthemanifesto.com/images/grapes-print.jpg

jeffery (jeffery), Sunday, 6 August 2006 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

ronan surely you must be talking about the dude with the bald spot @ 1.30.

breakfast pants (disco stu), Sunday, 6 August 2006 23:09 (nineteen years ago)

you can get a steak here, daddy-o. don't be a http://www.mathmlcentral.com/characters/glyphs/DottedSquare_L.gif

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Sunday, 6 August 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

"hey I am an artist, shuchameblah"

That is seriously one of the funniest phrases I've read in a while, though.

trees (treesessplode), Monday, 7 August 2006 06:10 (nineteen years ago)

it is everything dance music is about in 1.30.

that looks crap.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 August 2006 07:49 (nineteen years ago)

I think you misread, I said it is everything "DANCE MUSIC" is about in 1.30

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 7 August 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)

what do you mean?

jed_ (jed), Monday, 7 August 2006 09:40 (nineteen years ago)

dance music is about looking up and suddenly realizing that for the last hour you've been trapped behind a wall of sweaty men.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 7 August 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)

what is that record anyway?

-- (688), Monday, 7 August 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)

5. If you ever have the chance to meet Rich Hawtin, when talking with him - scruff his hairstyle around a bit.

HPSTRKRFT (haitch), Monday, 7 August 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

AKNOWLEDGE, AGREE AND REPEAT (sic), motherfuckers.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

just bitching from what I can tell. What do they propose to replace it with?
Funky House.

hector (hector), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

In an ideal world, yeah.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 7 August 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

I hear Justice and MSTRKRFT are pretty good.

alext (alext), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

Oh come on, that looks awesome. It's the ultimate proof at:

a) the cowbell is the greatest history in the history of music
b) there's no technology in the world that can compete with someone banging a pipe in the right way
c) especially if it has a big WOOMP WOOMP noise underneath it

Of course, it could have had some 303 squelching over the top, but that's a bit like the stick for the moon, really.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

history = instrument.

There's no enthusiasm in the world that can compete with proofreading.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

its almost like the corroding bell track that mills played, whatever that was

-- (688), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Never heard that one? Is it rare?

jimnaseum - formalist rigour! (jimnaseum), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

i dont know what it is:/

i like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldkBYCszlU8

-- (688), Monday, 7 August 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.