― Tape Store (Tape Store), Monday, 23 January 2006 01:17 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 January 2006 01:24 (twenty years ago)
All I've heard is "Crazy" - is the rest of the album like that, or is it mostly rhyming?
― Lukas (lukas), Monday, 23 January 2006 01:29 (twenty years ago)
― cutchem, Monday, 23 January 2006 02:04 (twenty years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 23 January 2006 16:42 (twenty years ago)
I haven't heard any of this, does it sound like Cee-lo doing Cee-lo or Cee-lo doing SOMETHING NEW ??
― SONNY, Monday, 23 January 2006 17:17 (twenty years ago)
― Thea (Thea), Thursday, 2 February 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)
― Jibé (Jibé), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:47 (twenty years ago)
Listening to the second song, I'm kinda disappointed ... sounds nowhere near as great as Crazy. But it may be the shitty comp speakers that ruin the song, since I can barely understand what he's singing.
― Jibé (Jibé), Thursday, 2 February 2006 22:52 (twenty years ago)
I DIDN'T WANT TO LIKE THIS, BUT I DID.
― team jaxon (jaxon), Thursday, 2 February 2006 23:20 (twenty years ago)
― telephone thing, Friday, 3 February 2006 03:28 (twenty years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Friday, 3 February 2006 04:00 (twenty years ago)
http://s42.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1GCDH33ZUZE2S1QKXJGA37NJCT (first time I ysi, dunno it'll work)
― Jibé (Jibé), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:31 (twenty years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Friday, 3 February 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)
I do like a few of the tracks on the sampler however (Crazy, Tracks 5 and 7)... Crazy definitely has some hit potential, and by god Cee-lo deserves one. Don't like the Violent Femmes cover.
Does anyone else think he sounds a bit flat in places? Certainly not as charismatic as usual...
― Mil (Mil), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:41 (twenty years ago)
― jaxon, Thursday, 16 March 2006 02:53 (twenty years ago)
― jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Thursday, 16 March 2006 02:58 (twenty years ago)
Sure, I'll anticipate the Gnarls Barkley release with you!
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Thursday, 16 March 2006 03:03 (twenty years ago)
― ryan kuo (ryan kuo), Thursday, 16 March 2006 03:09 (twenty years ago)
― tommytannoy, Thursday, 16 March 2006 03:28 (twenty years ago)
― jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Thursday, 16 March 2006 03:29 (twenty years ago)
Are any of those tracks other than "Crazy" anywhere near as good? When I first heard that song, I got really excited about this act. Anyone want to share?
― viborgu, Thursday, 16 March 2006 05:13 (twenty years ago)
Have you heard Demon Days?
― Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 16 March 2006 05:28 (twenty years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Thursday, 16 March 2006 05:39 (twenty years ago)
YSI
― telephone thing, Thursday, 16 March 2006 06:08 (twenty years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Thursday, 16 March 2006 06:22 (twenty years ago)
-- regular roundups
They wear the diapers in the movie! http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.gonemovies.com/WWW/XsFilms/SnelPlaatjes/ActKubrickClockwork.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.gonemovies.com/WWW/XsFilms/SnelPlaatjes/ActKubrickClockwork.asp&h=405&w=715&sz=32&tbnid=BIEoqMWkovRIeM:&tbnh=78&tbnw=138&hl=en&start=23&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dclockwork%2Borange%26start%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
― jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Thursday, 16 March 2006 09:44 (twenty years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Thursday, 16 March 2006 09:47 (twenty years ago)
― Uncle Tom (Uncle Tom), Thursday, 16 March 2006 20:06 (twenty years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― snowballing (snowballing), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:17 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:24 (twenty years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:31 (twenty years ago)
no fucking chance whatsoever.
― banana squad (dayvidday), Monday, 20 March 2006 23:42 (twenty years ago)
― myopic_void (myopic_void), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 00:38 (twenty years ago)
― danzig (danzig), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 05:15 (twenty years ago)
― charlie bucket (charlie bucket), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 06:00 (twenty years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Sunday, 26 March 2006 04:30 (twenty years ago)
― zeus (zeus), Thursday, 30 March 2006 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 March 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 30 March 2006 19:47 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 March 2006 20:06 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 30 March 2006 20:16 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 30 March 2006 20:17 (twenty years ago)
Gnarls Barkley does not exist. Nor does his first CD single. Yet tomorrow he is expected to make chart history by becoming the first act to get to number one without anyone handing over their money to a person behind a till.
― charlie bucket (charlie bucket), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 2 April 2006 16:06 (twenty years ago)
Yep, it happened: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/singles.shtml
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 2 April 2006 17:27 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 2 April 2006 17:54 (twenty years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 2 April 2006 18:05 (twenty years ago)
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Sunday, 2 April 2006 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― stirmonster (stirmonster), Sunday, 2 April 2006 18:07 (twenty years ago)
-- banana squad (...), March 21st, 2006 10:42 AM. (dayvidday)
HA HA HA HA HA!
― Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 2 April 2006 23:29 (twenty years ago)
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 3 April 2006 01:49 (twenty years ago)
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 3 April 2006 02:18 (twenty years ago)
― nabiscothingy, Monday, 3 April 2006 04:42 (twenty years ago)
Its totally sounds like that Moby track that was awful and huge years ago. with the gosphel singers on it.
― Savin All My Love 4 u (Savin 4ll my (heart) 4u), Monday, 3 April 2006 20:55 (twenty years ago)
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Monday, 3 April 2006 21:12 (twenty years ago)
― Guy Incognito (Guy Incognito), Monday, 3 April 2006 21:39 (twenty years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 3 April 2006 22:00 (twenty years ago)
Fuck I wish he'd go back to Goodie Mob. Big Gipp is a genius.
― paulhw (paulhw), Monday, 3 April 2006 22:12 (twenty years ago)
― Kevin Randles (Sydney124), Monday, 3 April 2006 23:00 (twenty years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 00:49 (twenty years ago)
― dead00, Tuesday, 4 April 2006 02:43 (twenty years ago)
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 03:32 (twenty years ago)
― team jaxon (jaxon), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:08 (nineteen years ago)
― smokemon (eman), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:35 (nineteen years ago)
― smokemon (eman), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:36 (nineteen years ago)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000F2C7L8.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Sunday, 9 April 2006 04:58 (nineteen years ago)
― smokemon (eman), Sunday, 9 April 2006 05:02 (nineteen years ago)
― billstevejim (billstevejim), Sunday, 9 April 2006 05:46 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 9 April 2006 06:37 (nineteen years ago)
― splates (splates), Sunday, 9 April 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)
― hmm, Sunday, 9 April 2006 13:22 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Sunday, 9 April 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Sunday, 9 April 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)
― someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Sunday, 9 April 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
Just curious, cause I'm having trouble tracking down the full length.
Can't wait till' this comes out, lovin' it so far, as with all Danger Mouse productions.
― Erock Lazron, Sunday, 9 April 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Monday, 10 April 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)
― okok, Monday, 10 April 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Erock Lazron, Monday, 10 April 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 10 April 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)
― alex t boo, Thursday, 13 April 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
British people are strange: Cee Lo played in a pub in London to 150 people 3 months ago, now he's number one with his worst work yet...
― paulhw (paulhw), Friday, 14 April 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― fgfhdghg, Saturday, 15 April 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
Single of the year for me so far!
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 15 April 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Saturday, 15 April 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Simon H. (Simon H.), Sunday, 16 April 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)
P.S. Cee-Lo sings the hell out of it but I was thinking it would've sound equally good coming from Terence Trent D'Arby / Sananda Maitreya.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Sunday, 16 April 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Hal! Jordan! HAL! JORDAN! (Barima), Sunday, 16 April 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)
Apart from Crazy, there's maybe two other tracks I think decent (Just A Thought, Who Cares). Couldn't care less about the rest.
I still maintain the record sounds rather flat and lifeless, even moreso in comparison to his solo work.
― Mil (Mil), Sunday, 16 April 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 17 April 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 17 April 2006 00:42 (nineteen years ago)
This record is fuckin' fantastic. It flows really well, and I've been listening to the whole thing over and over (except "Crazy", I don't want to get sick of it yet).
Maybe you guys think it's a grower, but there are so many amazing tracks - Just a Thought, Go Go Gadget Gospel (awesome), The Boogie Monster, Who Cares, Storm Coming, Smiley Faces, etc.
Honestly, I wish you guys could hear it the way I do, this is definitely making my top 10 this year.
― Erock LAzron, Monday, 17 April 2006 02:54 (nineteen years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Monday, 17 April 2006 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Hal! Jordan! HAL! JORDAN! (Barima), Monday, 17 April 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
― J. Lamphere (WatchMeJumpStart), Monday, 17 April 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)
I'd give it an 8.5/10 at least
― Erock LAzron, Monday, 17 April 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― --+++-+-, Wednesday, 19 April 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
I refuse to believe American music TV can be so bad as to have people enjoy TOTP.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 23:04 (nineteen years ago)
What American music TV, exactly? We have...um...American Idol? Saturday Night Live? The occasional pop-punk band on MTV?
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 20 April 2006 08:33 (nineteen years ago)
Go Go Gadget Gospel: the kick drums are too dry, battering out what little bassline there is. This goes for nearly all of DM's drum tracks. His production, in terms of managing highs, lows, mids, etc, is awful.Gone Daddy Gone is pointless.Boogie Monster is just a bad idea - it sounds like it should be from the Rocky Horror Picture Show...the "at first I was scared when I looked in his eyes.." vocal line is like something you'd practise for music class in grade school...Just a Thought Gets tired really quick...DM copping mid-90s DJ Shadow-style drums to lesser effect.Tranformer is a fucking mess - those triple kick drums, kids voices...it's the worst side of Cee Lo too - he sounds like a kid with ADD.Who Cares really needs to lose that Barry White "but who cares" ad lib.
The rest is all really good! But it's hard to listen to an album when every 2nd song is just annoying. Bring on the Jazzy Pha album!
― paulhw (paulhw), Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 20 April 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
I stand by my statement that this album is going to be in my top 10 this year.
― Erock LAzron, Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
Actually, there isn't a track I don't like on the whole album. "Transformer" took a few listens, but that was it.
Danger Mopuse forvever
― Erock LAzron, Thursday, 20 April 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
― xero (xero), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
Rock WolfChicago, IL
― Rock WOlf, Tuesday, 25 April 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
Why does white people never want black people to rock?
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
A lot of this is fairly good, but I wish I liked it more than I do.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 21:48 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)
― oh, wrinklepaws! (Wrinklepaws), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Andy_K (Andy_K), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 05:55 (nineteen years ago)
― deeej, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 06:22 (nineteen years ago)
― deeej, Wednesday, 26 April 2006 06:44 (nineteen years ago)
-- Martin Skidmore (lonewolf.cu...), Yesterday 11:31 PM. (later)
It's you, Nick.
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), Yesterday 11:48 PM. (later)
Yes I have a volume control! I also have a very good hi-fi set-up and this album is insanely fucking LOUD even at low volume - it's very, very compressed and hyperactive and dense and I find it difficult to listen to.
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 06:56 (nineteen years ago)
Like the album mostly. Some of it is very missable but bill neill OTM about repeatability. I too have weaned myself off it a little thanks mainly to Mr Scruff!
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 10:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 10:58 (nineteen years ago)
Does anyone else who saw it agree with me that their performance of "Crazy" on TOTP was the greatest TOTP performance since "Party Fears Two"?
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 11:34 (nineteen years ago)
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 11:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)
I congratulate you on finally "getting" the album.
Gnarls Forever
― Erock Lazron, Thursday, 27 April 2006 03:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 27 April 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Saturday, 13 May 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Sunday, 21 May 2006 12:30 (nineteen years ago)
I'm glad I'm not too jaded to hate this. I'm also glad the album is short; no bloat, no filler, just awesomeness.
― Dan (Thumbs Up) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 21 May 2006 13:55 (nineteen years ago)
Even the (clears throat) Violent Femmes cover is choice.
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 21 May 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Gone Daddy Gone/The Love Is AWESOME) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)
― okok, Sunday, 21 May 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
Goddammit, I've got some beef with the way people are reviewing this record. Fuck the Guardian for actually saying, "They sport the bowler hats, eye make-up and glasses of milk familiar from Malcolm McDowell's portrayal of Alex in A Clockwork Orange, further accessorised with blond bob wigs and what look like enormous nappies. Quite what this is meant to tell us is a mystery, unless it's that Green - who could stand to lose a few pounds - looks a bit upsetting when dressed in a blond bob wig, eye make-up and a big nappy," in their review. What? Who cares that dude is fat? What about engaging with the music, guys?
Speaking of which, I am apparently the only person who likes "Transformer," and I love it. It's one of the three best songs on the album to me.
Speaking of not engaging with the music though, the whole "Who is Gnarls Barkley?" angle is way played out. It seems like everyone is taking something these guys just sort of threw out there for fun (the name) and trying to read into it as a substitute for actually talking about the music. And when people do engage with the music, it is almost always on the most superficial level. I'm not interested in a long graph on the record setting/breaking "Crazy" did. I'm not interested in hearing how the record sounds too "busy" or "irritating," or how it's too short and slippery to really pay attention to. Isn't it the job of the critic to pay attention?
I do think the issue of longevity the Pitchfork review raises is a very interesting/important one. I know I am rating this record higher than I will at the end of the year (although every time I question myself on that after reading these reviews, I listen to the record and don't feel like I'm overrating it at all), but I am not even sure what I rate it now. Maybe a low 9. Maybe that will go down to a low 8. Most likely a mid-8. But I'm not sure yet. I will be interested to see how well this ages, because this is kind of a slippery record. The songs are short. It has a lot of energy, and it doesn't try to make any sort of claims on What's Going On-style importance or even Love Below-style "changing the game" sort of claims, largely because the game they are playing here is not a hip hop game. At all, really.
In fact, one of the most interesting things about this record to me is the way it seems to thwart any sort of "important" readings of it as a text while at the same time being SO DAMN GOOD it almost demands those readings. Which is to say, aside from the name of the group (and maybe not even that), I do not see this album as accidental in any way. The press photos strike me less as a couple of practical jokers playing dress up and more as a way of presenting a very slick public persona for the group. The same goes for the way they dress in concert. As for the music, I think that is extremely planned out as well, especially on Cee-Lo's part. He has become such a good writer (see "Who Cares?" for a song that seems trite and silly until you realize that is the point, as evidenced by the chorus/hook), and Danger Mouse has done a good job of creating these swirling soundscapes (the acoustic guitar parts on "Storm Coming" are brilliant!) that seem so chaotic "they just have to come from a lack of planning and a lot of fooling around in the studio, right?" If anything, I think one of this record's flaws may be that it is a little too thought out, and its chaos either makes up for that or makes it worse by seeming a bit contrived.
To return to what I said about this album thwarting close textual readings, I think the "but I'm fine" line in "Just a Thought" (also, the title) is a good example. Here is this song about being pushed to the point of thinking about suicide but knowing how ineffective it would be, in which Cee-Lo really comes across as a man on the brink. It's dark and disturbed, but then it ends with that line and is called "Just a Thought," and it makes it a lot harder to read into. I think this is actually kind of effective, as it gives even the "darkest" moments of the record a levity (the line about "good good head" at the end of "The Boogie Monster" is funny to me) that keeps it from taking itself too seriously.
Also, the fact that the record is composed of so many moments that can be read as microcosms for the whole album (cf. [am I using "cf." right?] the "production is progressive but the chords are retro" quoting that so many reviews have been doing) is another thing that really makes the record for me. I mean, Cee-Lo sounds as invested in the "cliched" (and, for what it's worth, I could listen to this man's cliches all day) verses in "Who Cares?" just as much as, if not more than, the chorus, which creates the kind of layers (some composed of rejecting those layers with a sort of "shut up and dance/enjoy yourself" message) this record is composed of.
When it comes down to it, I think St. Elsewhere is Al Green for this century. It's got that heart, that romantic element (though less so than other Cee-Lo stuff), and that "take 'em to church" spirit. It must be a Green thing. Ha! What a great/horrible way to end this rant.
ADDENDUM: What makes Cee-Lo such a uniquely talented vocalist, whether he is singing or rapping, is his ear. He knows how to combine sounds that are interesting in their similarity/contrast better than almost any current vocalist I can think of, sort of like the way Common finds all those "h" sounds on "My Way Home" (Late Registration)but with oodles and oodles of personality. This is what makes his lyrics/delivery similar to poetry to me. I don't want to say he has a poet's ear, but I will say he has a good poet's ear. (Use of a general concept of "poetry" being as ridiculous as a general concept of "music," in this sense.)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Sunday, 21 May 2006 17:57 (nineteen years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Sunday, 21 May 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Sunday, 21 May 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Sunday, 21 May 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Sunday, 21 May 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Sunday, 21 May 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Monday, 22 May 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Monday, 22 May 2006 01:11 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 May 2006 01:13 (nineteen years ago)
Is anybody going to Webster Hall tomorrow?
Still not comfortable with the album, but i LUV Transformer; it's the Othar Turner fife action that gets me. Anybody got a sample list for 'St. Elsewhere' yet?
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 22 May 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Monday, 22 May 2006 03:08 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Monday, 22 May 2006 04:14 (nineteen years ago)
Good, I'm not the only one. Also, it's nice to know it's rising, but I'm afraid of predictions. Plus, I somehow don't see it "connecting" with American audiences in the way it has with Britishes. Maybe that's just me be elitist about my own country. I don't know.
― regular roundups (Dave M), Monday, 22 May 2006 04:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (But I Would Say That) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
I'll say Top 20. If "Feel Good Inc." can catch on, so can this. I'll say it hits #15.
And I wish I were going to Webster Hall tomorrow, but long since sold out and I'm not well connected.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Monday, 22 May 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)
― domino (Tommy Tannoy), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Thursday, 25 May 2006 01:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 25 May 2006 01:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Thursday, 25 May 2006 01:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 25 May 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 25 May 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)
OTM.
I listened to the other songs they have posted on myspace, which I don't like as much as "Crazy," although I still like them. However, I find Cee-Lo's singing a lot more enjoyable than the stuff around him.
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Thursday, 25 May 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 25 May 2006 03:36 (nineteen years ago)
― k b, Thursday, 25 May 2006 04:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Chris Bee (Cee Bee), Thursday, 25 May 2006 04:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Thursday, 25 May 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Thursday, 25 May 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Friday, 26 May 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Friday, 26 May 2006 23:46 (nineteen years ago)
But aside from that, they were totally snooze-worthy. You never would've known from that performance that that was the song that's been rocking the UK for months.
― pleased to mitya (mitya), Saturday, 27 May 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Saturday, 27 May 2006 01:12 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Saturday, 27 May 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 27 May 2006 01:24 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Saturday, 27 May 2006 01:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Cunga (Cunga), Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:23 (nineteen years ago)
-- Geir Hongro (geirhon...), Today. (GeirHong) (later)
He was never an Outkast protege as such - he was always a member of the Goodie Mob. And I'm pretty certain he's been a prominent figure in hip-hop longer than Danger Mouse has, so to call him a protege is not entirely accurate.
-- chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (joe.goode...), Today. (chap) (later)
So, in other words, "um.... no."
― regular roundups (Dave M), Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:30 (nineteen years ago)
― regular roundups (Dave M), Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:31 (nineteen years ago)
Sounds like I'd like to keep it that way, too.
― Keywords: revenge, knife, granddaughter, demonic-possession, rock-star, eel (Aus, Saturday, 27 May 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)
Gnarls Barkley delete chart-topperThe reign of 'Crazy' is over
Gnarls Barkley are to delete their chat-topper 'Crazy' tomorrow (May 29), ending its run of nine consecutive weeks at the top of the charts.
The band now want to focus on the follow-up single, 'Smiley Faces', which is scheduled for a release on July 17.
Speaking in the character pf Gnarls Barkley, the band explained in a statement: "I consider myself a realist. I suppose that goes for most of us. But I have found a way to at once hold them, fold them, walk away and run. This was not a painless decision. But pain is nothing but a bi-product of beauty. Potentially toxic, to be sure, but that's all it is."
'Crazy' made music history when the track became the first to top the UK singles chart on download sales alone, and is the longest running Number One single since Wet Wet Wet's 'Love Is All Around' in 1994.
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Monday, 29 May 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 29 May 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
The silly reporter referred to them as 'Crazy' to turn it down!
I'm not disputing that this already is the annoying ringtone, etc., blah, blah of the year, and it will pop up, but interested to see this development at least. Downtown is still part of the WEA bohemoth, so, I'm wondering how much control they have over these decisions.
Frankly, I'm doubting the lasting power of the album. It's been 2 months listening to it, and I doubt it will make my top ten of the year. Forgettable. Everybody's criticism about this being a mediocre record with a few standout highlights was OTM.
― pher (pher), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 03:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Floss (Dan Floss), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Cunga (Cunga), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 03:32 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)
Cee-Lo and Andre 3000 went to the same high school for troubled kids and became friends; that's where a lot of the DF first met up. Seriously.
By "delete", it sounds like maybe they want to take the single off sale on itunes?
I assume the reason they're slowing this thing down so much when they play live is to allow Cee to actually be able to sing this beast. It's a tough song!
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 04:01 (nineteen years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)
-- banana squad (...), March 20th, 2006.
OTM
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
I don't think it's been adequately explained what this means, though.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 17:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 30 May 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)
Nelly Furtado recently covered it, too.
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Thursday, 1 June 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 06:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Keywords: revenge, knife, granddaughter, demonic-possession, rock-star, eel (Aus, Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
― corey c (shock of daylight), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 07:04 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
any votes on what's next? i'd like to see cee-lo as freddy and DM as jason, personally. backup singers and string players covered in blood, etc etc.
― Emily B (Emily B), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 9 June 2006 21:23 (nineteen years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Saturday, 10 June 2006 00:23 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Thursday, 15 June 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)
I loved loved loved Cee-Lo Green Is the Soul Machine, so this was a bit of the disappointment. "Crazy" is great, but many other songs on the album sound rather bland, hookless. Besides "Crazy", there aren't any tracks that would size to the level of "The Art of Noise", "Glockappella", "Evening News", or "Die Trying" of Cee-Lo's previous album. Danger Mouse's production has nice touches, but it sounds kinda like a pale sampled soul that tries to imitate the real thing. Also, I hate the distorted d'n'b style drums that feature on several tracks - they don't fit with the vocals at all. As much as I hate people who say electronic music isn't real, I'd love to hear an LP where Cee-Lo is backed by a "real" band. On "Soul Machine" the electronic beats added up to Cee-Lo's hip hop soul and made it more interesting, but here they don't do much that a live bad wouldn't do better.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 16 June 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)
― bill neil (inabillity), Saturday, 24 June 2006 01:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 24 June 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Saturday, 24 June 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot 4-Tay: forth-coming, my child. forth-coming most righteous champion (mar, Saturday, 24 June 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― JoB (JoB), Friday, 7 July 2006 10:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 7 July 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 14 July 2006 03:25 (nineteen years ago)
― zappi, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― deej, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Pye Poudre, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:32 (nineteen years ago)
New song! I like! http://therapup.rawkus.com/2008/01/gnarls-barkley-run.html Derivative! Fun! Could be a hit!
― forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
This song is fucking...gnarly.
― nickalicious, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
Cee-Lo is my favorite living human.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
― Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
Looking forward to a higher quality sample...sounds promising though.
― musically, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 01:29 (eighteen years ago)
-- nickalicious, Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:40 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
-- Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:42 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
don't have much problem agreeing with this sentiment, though this track ain't kicked in for me quite yet...
― dell, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 01:36 (eighteen years ago)
The leaked songs that i've heard are great...This could end up being one of the very best of 2006. Who else is excited? -- Tape Store (Tape Store), Monday, January 23, 2006 1:17 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link
WTF Tape Store 2K6?!??!?!?!?!
― Tape Store, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 06:32 (eighteen years ago)
2006 is gonna be awesome, mark my words.
― dell, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 06:52 (eighteen years ago)
Ser987so6luy, what's your pics f9r 08"?
― dell, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 06:54 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not trying to be a jerk, I just hiccoughed there. That's weirdly impressive of ya.
― dell, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 07:03 (eighteen years ago)
Again, I'm sorry about my ldkkkk34!?! posts. Sometimes things go wrong.
― dell, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 07:25 (eighteen years ago)
I think this song is okay, but not great. Too much of a pastiche, and not an interesting enough hook. Then again, that's how I felt about most of St. Elsewhere, so I guess it's not a surprise.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 07:28 (eighteen years ago)
i talked to khia yesterday and she said cee-lo is her favorite musician & her next record is gonna be heavily inspired by gnarls barkley
― and what, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
oh man i <3 gnarls sry i said mean things abt u upthread dangermouse
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 13:01 (eighteen years ago)
Sounds pretty good. As much as I´d prefer a new Cee-lo record, it at least has me hopeful that the new Gnarls record could be an improvement on the last.
― __CB__, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
It's pleasant enough, nothing special. Could be a grower though - I found Crazy and Who Cares were the only tracks I was into straight away on St. Elsewhere, and now I like pretty much all of them.
― chap, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
I thought I was the only one who thought Cee-Lo as a solo artist was much better than Gnarls Barkley. Glad to see someone else shares that view.
(x-post)
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
Re-listen to the Cee-Lo records, Tuomas, and then hit up Gnarls again; you'll realize that Lo is a lot more in control of GB than you might think.
― Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
i like ceelos singing that why i luv gnarls more
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
B-b-but he barely raps on his second solo album, most of the tunes are sung.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
That's a bad stutter there, Tuomas, you should do something about that.
― Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
Album is interesting on first listen; no obvious breakout hit but it's a fun psych pop thang so far.
― forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
Just me, huh? It opens up after a few plays; I hope it'll find a friendly niche.
― forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
I liked the samples I listened to on iTunes last night, sounded pretty promising.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
I'm optimistically curious, just haven't gotten round to stealing it yet.
― chap, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 19:59 (eighteen years ago)
"Gnarls Barkley" ??
-- Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:24 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link
^^ tracer otm
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:04 (eighteen years ago)
Only had one listen but forksclovetofu OTM re: no major hit. It does seem much more of a cohesive "album" than St Elsewhere - "Blind Mary" sounded nice.
― __CB__, Friday, 21 March 2008 21:37 (eighteen years ago)
Not a ton of buzz on this one..."Run" is good but it sounds like a pretty average Northern Soul song.
― musically, Sunday, 23 March 2008 03:36 (eighteen years ago)
some of the lyrics on this new album are fucking awful.
― mr x, Sunday, 23 March 2008 14:51 (eighteen years ago)
I find this album compeletly uninvolving compared to the first one. It's okay.
― HI DERE, Sunday, 23 March 2008 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
Guys if "Surprise" isn't destined to be a big summertime hit then I'll eat my hat.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 21:17 (eighteen years ago)
There are a few missteps on the album ("Whatever" in particular...well-named song) but it is fucking really solid.
Also love "Who's Gonna Save My Soul", "Open Book" (wouldn't sound out of place on In Rainbows), "Neighbors" a lot...but "Surprise"! Jesus, what a song, what a nice rhythm.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
It's at least going to be a great spring/summer road tripping album.
― nickalicious, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 21:26 (eighteen years ago)
My first impression is the songs have less immediacy but more depth than the ones on St. Elsewhere. There are some really nice moments.
― chap, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 22:48 (eighteen years ago)
"Surprise" for the second single.
― chap, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 23:44 (eighteen years ago)
Amazing live show.
― forksclovetofu, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)