Taking Sides: Depeche Mode with Alan Wilder or Without

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The last 2 albums by this band were overall mediocre particularly Exciter which to me is filled with retreads and extremely formulaic and stupid lyrics. While Martin Gore was never a great lyricist, his lyrics in Exciter are quite tired and pretentious in which he ends up sounding stupid. Now I know Gore always had his moments like these,but I am less tolerant of these moments of stupidity in Exciter. Musically speaking, I think Alan Wilder added some refinement to the music( if you ever listen to the demos they are extremely rough then you'll see what I mean) Moreover, Alan added some depth to the music that is now missing in their current stuff. Exciter is Martin Gore's ego trip.

MICHELINE, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Or - what about the Mode with and without Vince Clarke?

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

With or without guitars? Etc.

I have long claimed that Wilder is an unheralded arranger par excellence and will stick to that. His work on both Violator and Songs of Faith and Devotion in particular is just amazing, big and powerful without losing sight of the songs. How he transformed "Enjoy the Silence" from the quiet ballad Gore recorded it as to the monster it is alone deserves honors.

That said, you're not going to find me complaining about either Ultra or Exciter, at all. Tim Simenon on the first and Mark Bell on the second both did excellent jobs at helping out the arrangements and production, something Gore has always opening been fairly uninterested in. Simenon's work took the lead from Wilder's and added a few twists as it went, like on "The Love Thieves" and "The Bottom Line," while Bell's general emphasis on a quiet, focused intensity often works wonders, thus "Sweetest Condition," "When the Body Speaks," "Goodnight Lovers" and "Breathe."

As for Gore's lyrics, they are what they are. :-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Depeche Mode improved so much after dumping Vince "King Of Twee" Clarke that it isn't even funny. As for post-Wilder DM, I would say they've certainly gotten more solemn but definitely not any worse. Sonically, I think that "Useless", "Comatose" and "Barrel OF A Gun" are some of the coolest things they've ever recorded.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A little penicillin should clear that right up for her. Now excuse me while I go sob in the corner from a massive attack of the creeping horrors.

("flaky crust"... *shudder*)

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ARGH. Wrong thread.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

dan you're an odd cat.

ethan, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This is why he is loved.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The last two albums mediocre? There's no way I could possibly disagree more.

patrick, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've not heard Exciter (the songs rather than the sound of the singles has not tended to entice me that much), but I reckon Ultra is sonically fantastic. Even when he's trying to be dirty (eg. Songs of Faith & Devotion) Alan sounds a bit too clean, but Tim Simenon comes up with the most marvellously slimy synth sounds. That said, Alan presumably arranged "In Your Room" and that is godhead.

Tim, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Alan presumably arranged "In Your Room" and that is godhead.

Yes, my friend. Several times over.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's hard for me to say. Loved Simenon's production work on Ultra, perhaps more than any single Wilder album arrangement, but I didn't appreciate Mark Bell's work on Exciter very much. It was silly and weird where it should have been moody. Alan Wilder's approach was consistent with the group's direction at least, so I suppose I prefer him. The next album will really be what decides this for me though.

Vinnie, Friday, 8 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three years pass...
come on alan wilder plezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz com back to depeche mode i am begging you plezz

eric babcock, Thursday, 24 November 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

Maybe Alan Wilder, Bill Berry, and Graham Coxon could form a new supergroup together.

John Hunter, Thursday, 24 November 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)

DM don't suck now, but they were clearly better with Alan in the fold. He was invaluable in creating that larger than life sound which defined what, for me, was their greatest period - roughly between '87-93. They'll never get back there.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Friday, 25 November 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)

Alad Wilder had the best hair of the bunch and could sneer better than the rest of them.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 26 November 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)

five months pass...
Well, the new album is out now and I think it is a little better than Exciter but not as good as Ultra and I will tell you why. It's basic common sence really. What cd sold the most? Well looking at my records here it appears that since Alan has left it is Ultra, Their New Album (I don't even know the name because I didn't even buy it I just dubbed it from my brother) and Exciter.

Since Alan is no longer with the band the producers are using more and more of these white-noise "non melodic" synth tones for their keyboard sounds, especially on Exciter! I think it turns the average listener off unless you are a complete kraftwerk synth geek like me. I personally liked Ultra and listen to it from time to time.

Do I wish Alan was back in the band? Yes! Do you think Martin, Fletch, and Dave want him back? Yes! But if you were cut-out of the big money and not given your credit when credit is due, would you ever want to come back for more of that? I think not. That's my own belief and I think that is the main reason why Alan will never come back.

In my book Alan was Depeche Mode period!

DJTron, Friday, 28 April 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

After "Violator", Depeche have definitely been better without Wilder. That being said, their best three albums, "Construction Time Again", "Some Great Reward" and "Black Celebration" were all by the "classic" lineup, so I guess I prefer them with Alan after all, in spite of him being the one to blame most for the exaggerated "rock" sound of "Songs Of Faith And Devotion".

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

Since Alan is no longer with the band the producers are using more and more of these white-noise "non melodic" synth tones for their keyboard sounds

However, during the recording of their last album with Alan, Alan was alarmingly fond of guitars and way too distorted synth sounds. Depeche Mode were increasingly trying to become a cross-in-between U2 and Nine Inch Nails. This was mainly Alan's fault, and it took his departure to make them good old Depeche Mode again.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
"This was mainly Alan's fault, and it took his departure to make them good old Depeche Mode again."

Three words you left out there: "In my opinion."

That statement was quite laughable.
In MY opinion, Depeche Mode has never been "good old Depeche Mode" without the brilliance that is Alan Wilder... (Which is not to say DM hasn't been 'kickin @ss' with Touring the Angel, cause they have,) but IMHO, the current music of Depeche Mode is but a shell without Mr. Wilder.

Just my opinion. ;-)

Here's a FACT: A sh*tload of us around the globe CAN'T WAIT for your new material, Mr. Wilder!

Mr. Pointy, Saturday, 20 May 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)

I remember thinking for a while that Exciter was kind of a flat album and then I remembered "Freelove".

Dan (I Love This Band) Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 20 May 2006 23:57 (nineteen years ago)

Quite so. And you can't deny "When the Body Speaks," oh no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 21 May 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

I have liked all of their last three albums, but after all, with Wilder in the band they released such classics as "Construction Time Again", "Black Celebration", "Some Great Reward" and "Violator". Plus he is an underrated songwriter that wrote some of their best songs ever.

So I pick Depeche with Wilder even though his increasing interest in guitars and distorted synth sounds probably meant that him leaving before "Ultra" was a good thing.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 21 May 2006 02:06 (nineteen years ago)

It's kind of a stupid question because they've released what, four times as much material with Alan Wilder in the band as they have without him? So duh, OF COURSE there's more good material with him than without him; LEARN ONE BASIC MATH.

Having said that, Playing The Angel is EASILY the strongest album released by one of my old-time high school obsessions to date (the other contenders being The Cure and Waiting For The Sirens' Call; Prince doesn't count because I've loved him since I was 5). "Precious" and "John The Revelator" are phenomenal singles and, as far as the album tracks go, "The Sinner In Me", "I Want It All", "Nothing's Impossible", "Lillian" and "The Darkest Star" are just... wow. Awesome. IMO, fans of the old stuff who claim they've fallen off are slaves to nostalgia more in love with the fey bondage imagery than they are with the music.

Dan (Great, Great Album) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 21 May 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

What the man just said. I can but echo it. Playing is astoundingly strong and the live performances can be transcendent. This band is on a continuing roll.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 21 May 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

IMO, fans of the old stuff who claim they've fallen off are slaves to nostalgia more in love with the fey bondage imagery than they are with the music.

I know I shouldn't take this personally, Dan, but I do. If I happen to like "Master and Servant" more than "John the Revelator," it has everything to do with DM's old stuff having TONS more energy and vitality than their new stuff. They're still a good band, but for the most part from Violator on DM have sounded a bit tired. I guess I agree with Geir to a degree. I'm not sure I agree that Alan Wilder is responsible for the shift in DM's sound, though.

(Of course I like Vince-era Depeche Mode and Construction Time Again more than yr average bloke does. Maybe at heart I'm just a 14-year-old Britgirl living in 1981.)

(Incidentally, Erasure > Recoil. But I still love Alan and think he was the best thing that ever happened to the band.)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

(Also, I'm not a "slave to nostalgia" because I was born in 1987.)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

DAMN YOU FOR BEING SO YOUNG. Age faster. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

That's kind of funny to me because "Master And Servant" is a song that I dislike more the more times I hear it; actually the singles from Some Great Reward pale in comparison to the album tracks (although if "Somebody" actually was a single it's a huge exception).

Construction Time Again is my second- or third- favorite Depeche album; my point is not that their older stuff pales in comparison to their newer stuff. My point is more that if you can't hear energy and vitality in "John The Revelator" (or "Suffer Well", even though I'm not as hot on that song as others are), you aren't really listening. Or rather, you are listening with prejudice; it doesn't make sense to me to criticize an album made in 2005/2006 for not sounding like it was made in 1984/1985. It's a different piece of work coming from a completely different artistic space by people who've experienced a lot more; if Playing The Angel WAS a direct regurgitation of classic-era DM without any sense of growth or evolution it would be a total sham and a complete artistic failure in my eyes. Fortunately for me, it isn't. I think it's too bad you don't see it the same way because I think you're missing out.

Dan (No Offense Meant) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

B-b-but Playing The Angel is a direct regurgitation of Violator-era DM!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

(I like "Lillian")

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

although if "Somebody" actually was a single it's a huge exception

Double A-side.

B-b-but Playing The Angel is a direct regurgitation of Violator-era DM!

Uh, no. (Ben Hillier is a *completely* different producer/engineer from the Flood/Alan Wilder team, and you can hear it easily.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 21 May 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

I agree with Dan's LEARN ONE BASIC MATH analysis, but I'll add that I wouldn't have expected DM's post-Wilder sound to be so adaptable. You might have assumed that Wilder would understand the DM style better than any outside producer, therefore, when Martin decided to write a gospel album ("Songs of Faith and Devotion"), only a fellow band member like Wilder would be capable of indulging Martin's whims while still making an instantly recognizable DM record. Instead, the band has seamlessly adjusted to working with new producing teams after more than ten years of working with only one -- with the emphatic inclusion of "Playing the Angel" which lifted the best bits from several older DM albums but arranged the pieces in a way that was fresh and unlike anything they'd already done. Not to mention that Dave Gahan is writing songs now -- another addition to the DM toolbox that wasn't around during the Wilder years.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 21 May 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

IMO, fans of the old stuff who claim they've fallen off are slaves to nostalgia more in love with the fey bondage imagery than they are with the music.

OTM. They did alienate some old fans with "Songs Of Faith And Devotion" (not any more than the new ones they gained), but those who have actually listened to the three albums they have released after that one have long since returned to the fold.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 21 May 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)

I love Ultra. I love half of Exciter. The new one, aside from "Precious", just doesn't do anything at all for me. I don't hate it--I can barely hear it. Weird.

Just saw them live. The drummer made the show. Martin wore this absurd hat that looks like a goth peacock. Dave's black suit was excellent--his voice less so. Martin was in good voice, and the bits where he did REALLY old stuff like they were folks songs was nice.

Anyway, the CDs. As much as I love Ultra, I still feel some element X is gone and I miss it. Was it Wilder? Dunno.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Monday, 22 May 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

(The libe highlight was I Fell You, done in semi-metal form. The lowlight was Stripped, which RAMMS+EIN now do a million times better live. Weird.)

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Monday, 22 May 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

(The libe highlight was I Feel You, done in semi-metal form. The lowlight was Stripped, which RAMMS+EIN now do a million times better live. Weird.)

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Monday, 22 May 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

I had such a visceral "OH YES" reaction to "The Sinner In Me" and "I Want It All" that I don't understand how people can't adore at least those two songs (and "Precious", natch).

Calling Playing The Angel a retread of Violator is really, really odd to me because I don't think there's anything on Violator that sounds like "A Pain That I'm Used To", "John The Revelator", "Suffer Well", "Macro", "I Want It All", "Nothing's Impossible", "Damaged People", "Lillian" or "The Darkest Star".

Dan (Eh?) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

But they're all sung by Dave or Martin DO YOU SEE? So clearly they're like Violator!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

I should finally get this album!

I think I like nu Depeche Mode most when they're making blatant tributes to their older material but with an air of tiredness and emptiness to it all. It actually suits their desiccating sordid pseudo-goth aura to be self-cannibalising in this way. The air of aged arty decadance that started to creep in on the album tracks for Songs of Faith & Devotion is U&K - the more so because it powers the entirety of Ultra. They fall down when they try to cut through this with directness (yuk "Freelove"). I want all of their stuff to be increasingly convoluted allusions to their own past glories (this is why "The Bottom Line" is such a quietly ace track).

"Innovation" is not something one really wants from Depeche Mode, except insofar as it means interesting synth sounds. The progression in their work is more like degeneration or perhaps erosion, this yawning chasm between bang-up-to-date production and ever-more-archaic songwriting. It's charming!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

It'd be interesting to dig into the assumptions of what makes a style of songwriting archaic or not. (Not criticizing your take on Martin's influences in particular, which he freely admits tend towards the middle decades of the last century, but instead I'm just wondering what really *has* changed and what hasn't? How much overall has function driven form in Them Wider Pop Worlds?)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

Though Alan was always my favorite Mode, I gotta agree with Dan re:DM doing an awesome job of working with different producers to get fresh sounds and arrangements with every new album.
I love PTA because it sounds like a great pop giant getting it's second (or third) wind, not because it's some Violator retread. That said, John the Revelator is one of the worst DM songs of the last twenty years. It might've worked if Alan were still with them, or even bomb the bass, but as it is it just comes off too flat and soft. I know i know, depeche mode is supposed to be all glittery pop, but it's got less bluesy grit than Gore's "motherless child" cover FFS.

Fetchboy (Felcher), Monday, 22 May 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)

Good lord, I couldn't disagree more, I think it's a spectacularly dramatic and brutal track.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)

depeche mode is supposed to be all glittery pop

WHAT WHAT WHAAAAT??

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 22 May 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

But they're all sung by Dave or Martin DO YOU SEE? So clearly they're like Violator!

oh come off it Ned, you're better than this.

Playing the Angel is a fine album, just a little too compressed/digital sounding. It reminds me of Violator because I feel like the album was tooled to replicate the formula that made Violator successful ("Precious" reminds me of "Enjoy the Silence" (though I think I like it even more than "Enjoy the Silence"); "John the Revelator" reminds me of "Personal Jesus" as the token A-side bluesy questions-of-faith piece, though I hate "John the Revelator" with a passion and I like "Personal Jesus" quite a lot though mostly for the pretty synth stuff at the end rather than the bluesy questions-of-faith part though that's nice too, certainly moreso than John the Motherfucking Revelator). Maybe I'm just not experienced enough with post-1988/post-Violator production enough to appreciate its nuances.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 22 May 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know if two songs on each album that could be ascribed similar functions counts as a "retread". Even there, equating the snarling venom of "John The Revelator" with the robotic ice of "Personal Jesus" because they both deal with religious imagery doesn't sit well with me because there's nothing sonically similar between the two songs or the way they use that imagery at all. ("Personal Jesus" is way more about questions-of-consumerism than it is questions-of-faith anyway but that's a different conversation.)

Also could you list out all the other token A-side question-of-faith pieces from their albums that go into this formula? I can only think of the two.

Finally, people who hate "Freelove" are evil robots.

Dan (Lasers Where Their Hearts Should Be) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)

Also could you list out all the other token A-side question-of-faith pieces from their albums that go into this formula?

Dude, I just said that's the only reason it reminds me of Personal Jesus! I didn't say they included songs like that on all their albums! I realize the songs and their respective themes are completely different, I'm sorry I said anything. I feel like a horrible Depeche Mode fan now.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 22 May 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

I knew "Personal Jesus" wasn't about questions of faith, but it's the religious wordage that draws people into both it and "John the Revelator" and that's why I said it was replicating the formula for success that they had for Violator. I don't think DM and their music are formulaic in the least. It's just that when I first popped in Playing the Angel and heard "John the Revelator" the first thing that popped into my head was that they were trying to do another "Personal Jesus."

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 22 May 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

I don't see how "Playing The Angel" sounds any more like "Violator" than "Ultra" does. For me "Playing The Angel" is more like what Depeche Mode would have sounded like if they had kept using mainly analog synths while their songwriting developed in a "darker" direction during the mid 80s.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

Btw. Speaking of all those religious references: Has Fletch (who is a devoid Christian) ever spoken about what he feel about the lyrics to songs such as "Blasphemous Rumours", "Personal Jesus" and "Sacred"?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

(I just realized that I've never actually listened to Ultra or Songs of Faith and Devotion so that explains my COMPLETELY ASS-BACKWARDS ANALYSIS of DM from the '90s onward, so plz disregard all my posts on this thread. Thanks.)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 22 May 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

"Ultra" is actually a very underrated album that is light years better than "Songs Of Faith And Devotion".

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:46 (nineteen years ago)

going to weigh in on this from a totally personal POV, but i do wonder if in the past i was giving Alan Wilder too much credit for the DM "sound". i say this because it dawned on me that i have been at least somewhat disappointed in his subsequent releases (have heard the two recoil albums anyway) because even though i didn't expect him to replicate the DM thing, i did expect something that would rival it. meanwhile, even though i doubt anything will ever top the Masses album for me, more recent DM has suprised me more than once. "Nothing's Impossible" in particular made me stupidly happy because it felt like this connection finally existed that bridged my tastes now and what i liked back then.

Kim (Kim), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

Apropos of nothing, a guy I know's review of the DM show last night:

I saw Depeche Mode last night at the nissan pavillion in Northern VA... what an amazing show! The last time I saw them was for the Violator tour and they're better nowdays!! They did my favorite song from ULTRA (I love that album - don't care what anyone says) - "Home" and they did a few from Black Celebration including "A Question of Time", "Stripped", and "It Doesn't Matter Too". They did a wicked encore consisting of "Leave in Silence", "Photographic", and "Never Let Me Down Again". They were just amazing on stage with this relentless energy!! They did 4 songs from Playing the Angel, some from Violator, Music for the Masses, Songs of Faith and Devotion... they rocked!! It was so amazing and to make it even better my ex and her husband brought my daughter along as well - it was her first concert and she looooves DM, she loved the concert and cried when "Stripped" came on and freaked out when they played "John the Revelator"... she's 8 years old. It's so amazing to be there when your daughter's first concert is that of a band that you grew up listening to in the 80's.

Meantime:

i do wonder if in the past i was giving Alan Wilder too much credit for the DM "sound"

I still give him the credit -- but not as a memorable songwriter.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:57 (nineteen years ago)

How many times do I have to remind you he wrote "Two Minute Warning" and "The Landscape Is Changing", Ned?

Dan (Credit Where Credit Is Due) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 22 May 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

And that's it. ;-) But I kid Recoil, though I can't say I listen to any of those albums much. Maybe Wilder just needs to be in a pop act to write pop songs most of the time.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

(just to pop in again on a subject I swore I wouldn't talk about anymore, perhaps the reason "Master and Servant" is more interesting to me than "John the Revelator" is because I first heard it in 2004 and not 1984, thus it has not had time to tire on me as it has Dan. Also, as someone who grew up on ultracompressed '90s/'00s music, a song made in 1984 is much much more new-sounding and interesting than any song off Playing the Angel. I know Playing the Angel doesn't sound anything like what's played on the radio these days, but even though it's mostly analogue it still bears the mark of a record made in 2005. ARGH GOD CURTIS GET OFF THIS THREAD)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 22 May 2006 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

just to pop in again on a subject I swore I wouldn't talk about anymore, perhaps the reason "Master and Servant" is more interesting to me than "John the Revelator" is because I first heard it in 2004 and not 1984, thus it has not had time to tire on me as it has Dan.

Well, absolutely! I played "Master And Servant" to DEATH about 18 years ago and since then I've been pretty much all set with the song.

Dan (Don't Take It So Hard, Dude) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 22 May 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)

And that's it. ;-)

He also wrote "Fools". IMO one of their best ever b-sides.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 22 May 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

and "the curse" the best ever electro-hiphop track
(don't even try to pretend moby isn't your favorite MC)

Fetchboy (Felcher), Monday, 22 May 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

I just did.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

Master and Servant >>>>>> Recoil > John the Revelator = curtis' farts

Fetchboy (Felcher), Monday, 22 May 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)

she loved the concert and cried when "Stripped" came on ... she's 8 years old

Seriously, these are the values I want to instill in my future children.

For me "Playing The Angel" is more like what Depeche Mode would have sounded like if they had kept using mainly analog synths while their songwriting developed in a "darker" direction during the mid 80s.

I agree ... my initial reaction to "Playing the Angel" was that of a long-lost sequel to "Black Celebration" (perhaps not in its sound but definitely in its mood).

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 04:40 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
http://brianstagg.co.uk/p_t_a_clipressed/

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 23 July 2006 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

haha, nick southall to thread.

derrick (derrick), Sunday, 23 July 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)

three months pass...
In sound and mood, "Playing The Angel" was a long lost sequel to "A Broken Frame" (minus "See You", "The Meaning Of Love" and "Photograph" - all of which were a bit too light hearted to fit in on the "Broken Frame" album).

And, mind you, the sequel was better than the one released in the first place.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 November 2006 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

Calling SOFAD a "rock album" is like calling Black Sabbath's Sabbath Bloody Sabbath their "synth album"

SOFAD is fucking amazing... a tad less perfect than Violator, but virtually a tie. SOFAD has more "gospel" than it does "rock".

gwynywdd dwnyt fyrwr byychydd gww (donut), Saturday, 11 November 2006 06:10 (nineteen years ago)

People, take my advice...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 06:11 (nineteen years ago)

SOFAD has way too much gospel and way too much rock. Songs such as "Judas" and "Walking In My Shoes" still make it worthwhile, but it remains the worst Depeche Mode album nevertheless.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

Was "Home" on Ultra?

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:15 (nineteen years ago)

Yes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

i miss mr wilders vocals on depeche mode releases and his musical influence. and he wrote the two best tracks on construction time again.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Saturday, 11 November 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

not very wild in general, imo

Totally Different Guy Now (Dick Butkus), Saturday, 11 November 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

I'm very impressed with the production work of the post-Wilder era, but part of me still wants to bitchslap Gahan for being such a junkie fuckup and edging Wilder out of the band (granted, Wilder's choice but still, fucking hell), as I think the band's best albums may have been coming yet... although I don't think I've heard a let-down Depeche album since A Broken Frame, which sounds like a band trying to rebound from being ditched by Clarke, and even A Broken Frame isn't bad at all.

gwynywdd dwnyt fyrwr byychydd gww (donut), Saturday, 11 November 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

"A Broken Frame" is a bit directionless, but certainly not bad. "Leave In Silence", "Monument", "My Secret Garden", "Nothing To Fear", "Satellite" and "Shouldn't Have Done That" are all really great tracks.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 11 November 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)

part of me still wants to bitchslap Gahan for being such a junkie fuckup and edging Wilder out of the band

The situation is much more complicated than that -- if there was a balance of forces, it was Martin and Andy vs. Alan and David, but the former was and is a close friendship and the latter was one of convenience in a working situation, though it's true that David still misses working with him and has said so. The Steve Malins-written official bio indicates that while Gahan's collapse was certainly a factor, Wilder's own decision to leave was more motivated by running personal and professional problems with Gore and Fletcher. After the Devotional tour he took half a year to chill and see if he really wanted to leave -- he realized he did, tried to contact Gahan to let him know, didn't hear back from him (as Gahan was rotting away in LA), and in the meantime called a meeting in London with Gore and Fletcher to announce he was out. He then issued a statement to the press confirming his absence and that was that.

Pretty much I would have to agree with Wilder's own assessment that his role as the key arranger in Depeche from the mid-eighties on (taking over the role from Daniel Miller, in essence) was crucial and never quite appreciated by the band as such -- Gore writes the songs and then tends to let them go wherever they do, Gahan's own focus is as a singer (though this has changed increasingly given his new songwriting focus) and Fletcher is around basically to question if something ever gets too 'weird.' Wilder as (literal) synthesizer is obviously inextricable from Depeche's story and the confluence of approaches within the band's work that defined the upward arc through the eighties and early nineties clarifies this.

Like I've muttered elsewhere, though, while Wilder's departure was Depeche's loss, the result has been a series of albums that, precisely because they are overseen by different producers each time (Tim Simenon's astoundingly great job on Ultra, Mark Bell's glitch/microhouse-goes-mainstream touches on Exciter and Ben Hillier's mix-and-match work for Playing the Angel) has given Depeche even more variety as the years continue, albeit via an external source rather than an internal one. Meantime Wilder's work on his own ultimately lacks the killer immediacy that his efforts within a pop context provided in Depeche -- Recoil is striking but not stunning. So while it was a regret that he left, his own fortunes arguably were worse off, in that one of the preeminent and most influential arrangers of his time -- the more so because he worked within a singular band context rather than with a wide variety of artists -- was without his best vehicle for demonstrating his talent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 November 2006 00:33 (nineteen years ago)

I miss the sense of emotional apocalypse you get on Ultra, the electro-Judy Garlandy anthems of Black Celebration, the absolute pop brilliance of Violator, the insane over-everythinging of SOFAD.

The new stuff is (imagines the wrath of Ned) nice, sometimes incredibly beautiful.

But if I were 16 and troubled, it wouldn't reach me. Which seems the defintion of DM-ness.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Sunday, 12 November 2006 07:06 (nineteen years ago)

DM's fans aren't 16 anymore, which means I see no point in why their recent stuff should mainly appeal to troubled 16YOs.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 12 November 2006 10:16 (nineteen years ago)

troubled late 30 somethings i dare say.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Sunday, 12 November 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)

The band have made a few comments about how they seem to be lucky with a fanbase both near their age and also quite younger, so who knows? It could be that they're luckier there in their European audience as well -- the last couple of live DVDs show plenty of Troubled Young Types in the audience hanging on every word.

And I wouldn't call "John the Revelator" nice. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 November 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

The DM show I just saw was pretty funny audience-wise: early 40-somethings and goths.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Sunday, 12 November 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

Those of us who know Depeche Mode since they were at their musically best PRE "Music For The Masses" are all at least in our mid 30s by now. All the wanna-b's who have discovered them afterwards may be younger, but they are not real Depeche Mode fans if they like the stuff with guitars better than the stuff without.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 12 November 2006 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

oh jesus christ. geir = lolfest here

So I guess the upcoming Saddle Creek tribute to Depeche Mode is something you wouldn't be into then, Geir?

gwynywdd dwnyt fyrwr byychydd gww (donut), Sunday, 12 November 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

Generally, the Americans didn't discover Depeche Mode while Depeche Mode were at their best.

Their 90s and 00s albums have still been excellent by most bands' standards (at least apart from "Songs Of Faith And Devotion"), but none of them are quite up there with the arch-English synthpop genius of "Construction Time Again", "Black Celebration" and "Some Great Reward" - albums that the Americans just didn't get.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 12 November 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

Geir I was 16 when I first got into Depeche Mode two years ago, by the influence of my Depeche-loving girlfriend who was also 16. And I like pre-Violator Depeche better.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 12 November 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

reminder, Depeche Mode release a greatest hits comp tomorrow

http://bestof.depechemode.com/unitedkingdom.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Best_Of%2C_Volume_1

and to think i was in the last year of primary school when "New Life" hit the charts in June 1981

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 12 November 2006 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

I would have preferred them to wait for some years and then release, for instance, "The Singles 2002-2010" instead. This looks like a cash-in.

But the special edition with the music videos seems like a less pointless investment than the single CD.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 12 November 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

ILM has too many depeche mode threads. this is not necessarily a bad thing. anyway, there's a small bit of discussion about the best-of here.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 13 November 2006 00:36 (nineteen years ago)

without knowing what's on the dvd with the videos, is it safe to assume that the videos from see you all the way get the balance right won't be included, as they never seem to be? i mean, the see you video was partially filmed in woolies, i think and the less said about the meaning of love video the better.....mince pies anyone?

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 13 November 2006 01:14 (nineteen years ago)

I've barely seen any of the early videos outside of "Just Can't Get Enough" and "People Are People" and I kinda want to keep it that way...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 13 November 2006 01:52 (nineteen years ago)

Ned, the Martin/Alan/Fletch shots on "Everything Counts" are adorable. Don't be such a cynic.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

(although Dave does look a bit like Ryan Stiles)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 02:10 (nineteen years ago)

leave in silence, from what i remember, wasn't too bad. get the balance right involved a fairground i think. i really must check youtube for these and post the links.

see you - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsKJB14eJyM
the meaning of love - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g86HQMk5ZME&mode=related&search=
leave in silence - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1wYppIqhB0
get the balance right - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uCMsRGJfvo

monument (hopefully the performance from 'crackerjack'!) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nEp9oQ-czg


frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 13 November 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

"Get The Balance Right" has Alan singing the first verse because the director thought he was the lead singer, and DM were too timid to tell him otherwise!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

"See You" not-slowed-down: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeiyIFFPcrs

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

"Leave In Silence" is a great video. "See You" is incredibly stupid though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

Btw. those "See You" videos linked above have been made by Anton Corbijn years later. The correct 1982 clip (or at least part of it) is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRIyt3f2biQ

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 11:19 (nineteen years ago)

He was invaluable in creating that larger than life sound which defined what, for me, was their greatest period - roughly between '87-93.

Their two worst studio albums were both released during this period. Stadium rock tailor made for American audiences? No, thank you!

"Violator" is undeniably a great album, but the two others weren't. Judging from those three albums, it was a good thing Alan quit. He did a great job arranging their albums from 1983 through 1986 though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, even though "Violator" is great, I suspect Alan is to blame for those annoying rock guitars in the chorus of "Personal Jesus" too.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 12:03 (nineteen years ago)

violator was only let down by the appalling vinyl pressing in the uk.
if only fletch had locked away martin's guitar during the recording of construction time again.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 13 November 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

Forever, you mean? Would have been a good idea then.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

No idea about the vinyl pressing btw. I bought the CD on the day it was released and didn't discard it until the remastered special edition arrived this year.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

the clear vinyl music for masses sounded better than the violator initial pressing (bought on day of release, sadly never won the chain with no name prize draw for violator goodies tho), - no idea if it was re-pressed.

i was always sure that alan wilder sang the lead vocals on a few album tracks / b-sides.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 13 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

incidentally - and this is just pointless nosy gossip, but too bad - anyone else heard any dubious rumours about dave gahan and a druggy relapse recently? i sincerely hope this isn't the case, but there's a rumour doing the rounds :(

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, even though "Violator" is great, I suspect Alan is to blame for those annoying rock guitars in the chorus of "Personal Jesus" too.

I'm pretty sure this was a Martin thing. But I think "Personal Jesus" is a great track, guitars and all (though mostly for the coda).

i was always sure that alan wilder sang the lead vocals on a few album tracks / b-sides.

I thought this too, but it's all Dave and Martin on lead vox. Dave's voice can be deceptive when he sings in a higher/more breathy register.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

I remember the big high-school rumor that Gahan never actually sang, it was all a hoax, and it was always Wilder secretly singing all the songs.. of course, this was debunked well before Alan left the band.

gwynywdd dwnyt fyrwr byychydd gww (donut), Monday, 13 November 2006 17:41 (nineteen years ago)

landscape is changing - wilder singing? sounds different from gahan and if you saw it live, gahans voice sounded totally different with it.

i thought fools was sung by wilder but on closer listening i'm sure it's gahan.

there's been some tracks when you think that wilder sings one bit and gahan sings the rest. i must dig out the alan wilder demos i nabbed off soulseek ages ago and give them another listen.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Monday, 13 November 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

"Landscape Is Changing" is definitely Dave - listen to the Speak & Spell version of "Photographic," it's the same voice.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 November 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

I find that mind-boggling!

The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

"The Landscape Is Changing" sounds a lot like early Gahan, yes. Also listen to "See You" as an example.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

four years pass...

http://stereoklang.se/blog/?page_id=17978

The multi-talented F.R. David (Billy Dods), Friday, 19 August 2011 09:54 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.