name the one album that most competently bridges the gap between glam rock and post punk

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Sparks - Kimono My House (

lukeeluke (soulex45), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

Metro - Metro

Andy_K (Andy_K), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

Station to Station

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

roxy music - for your pleasure

ZR (teenagequiet), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

Here Comes The Warm Jets

duh, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

Here Comes the Warm Jets feels like the right answer to me. Not only because of Brian Eno's friendship with and influence on both glammers and punkers but because... well it sounds like both to me.

~~~~~, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

Oh and maybe something by the Homosexuals or Swell Maps who both seem pretty glammed out to me. Especially in the Homosexual's vocals. Oh and just LOOK at the guys from Suicide.

~~~~~, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

the fever - red bedroom

dan. (dan.), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

cheap trick - s.t.

no wonder steve albini loves them.
"he's a whore" is the perfect example.

goood, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

John Cale - Slow Dazzle

Lloyd Bonecutter (Lloyd Bonecutter), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

I'm a little puzzled how Here Comes the Warm Jets could be post-punk when it pre-dates punk?

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

cuz post-punkers bit it for everything it was worth?

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm a little puzzled how Here Comes the Warm Jets could be post-punk when it pre-dates punk? "

yes, cause its ahead of time.
(reminds also of the later mbv,"fall","birthday party","talking heads" etc...)

ffffffffffffffff, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

Peter Hammil's Nadir's Last Chance
any Deaf School

not really the experimentalism of post-punk, but the first one is a pseudo-glam proto-punk record by an art rocker and the second is post-Roxy Music stuff by a band a bit energized by pub-rock and punk, esp. on the third LP.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

Magazine's Real Life?

nerve pylon (flat_of_angles), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

The Tubes, "White Punks on Dope"

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

Is Nadir's Big Chance really a psuedo-glam proto-punk record or is that just because of the first song on there? I've never listened to it all the way through, but it seemed like there's that first song and then maybe the rest just kind of sounds like Van der Graaf?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

xtc - white music

Dominique (dleone), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

(I ask in part because Julian Cope has made it out to be that, too. - xp)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:30 (nineteen years ago)

There's a few more rockers, and over all I think it's less bombastic then the VDGG I've heard. The songs are just simpler, explained also perhaps by his saying they were "old" songs. I dunno, I will say, that while it isn't glam, or proto-punk or anything other then a great song, "The People You Were Going To" is one of my top favorite songs every. Heartbreaking and beautiful.

I think part of that legend comes from Johnny Rotten playing that song on the infamous radio show he did while still a Sex Pistol.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

*Glam*-orous post-punk dude: Steve Treatment

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

Also Ziro Baby/Zarjaz (of the Tronics):

http://www.freakapuss.com/imgs/zarjazred.jpg

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

XTC actually started out in 1973 as a glam band named Helium Kidz (though, as far as I know, that incarnation never saw anything commercially released). You could make a good argument that they skipped the "punk" part of the equation and hopped from glam to post-punk.

James, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)

>The songs are just simpler, explained also perhaps by his saying they were "old" songs.<

Right, so more like Aerosol Grey Machine, but of course that's not really a proto-punk glam record either.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

How about Von Lmo? I'm not sure of his discography though - I have one album (Tranceformer), but I think it's a compilation of stuff rather than a proper album.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

Cowboys International

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

"Station to Station"

"roxy music - for your pleasure"

OTM

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)

oops, I thought it said song not album when I listed that Tubes song, duh (plus I was only joking, sort of. But I do kind of think of Sparks and Tubes as "the firt new wave bands.)

Amazed nobody has mentioned Zolar X yet though.

(Not to mention anything by Boney M. And about a hundred other things.)

Like say *U.K. Squeeze* (their first and most post-punk one).

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

MX-80 Sound?
Lene Lovich (who earned her glam credentials via Eurodisco)?
Or, uh, Devo??
Or wait why not Gary Glitter who sounded exactly like Adam and the Ants and Bow Wow Wow?
Or Suzi Quatro's first album, for the dub and funk stuff in "Primitive Love"?
Hell maybe even Talking Heads 77 (which I think Xgau compard to Sparks when it came out)

Part of my problem is that I'm not really sure what people mean by "post-punk." (In 1980, I don't think it was a *kind* of music, or at least not a specific *sound*; people would have been more likely to call the stuff new wave or, uh, punk-funk {which was kinda stupid I admit.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

Okay, my last nomination: M, *New York London Paris Munich.*

Or else *Crossing the Red Sea With the Adverts.* I don't know which.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

Or something by Skafish (or Wazmo Nariz, who may or may not be the same person).

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

Q: Are we getting a nu definition of "post-punk" as anything New Wave now (perhaps partly via the Simon Reynolds book)?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

And I only say that because I have never knowingly heard Skyhooks.

(Which reminds me: When did Split Enz start? Weren't they some kind a glam band long before "I Got You"? Where are all the sheepfuxors when you need them?)

xp obv

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

station to station is a VERY good answer!

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

Post-punk is a style now, not "anything post punk". For the sake of this thread, it's a bit style, and a bit attitude. It's not Boney M though. Or Talking Heads 77.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

I still like your first uggestion (Tubes), xhuxk. When I think of labelling something post-punk, I always think -- somewhat literally, of something like PiL or no wave stuff -- people who pursued noise (or the avoided pop instinct that birthed new wave).

Mitya (mitya), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

Some Roxy Music or early Eno. Cannot quite tell which.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, but why NOT Talking Heads? I mean, they were an artsy band that came out of the punk scene and drew on funk (from the beginning on -- the first album has as much KC and the Sunshine Band as Sex Pistols in it.) How are they not post punk but, I dunno, Delta 5 and Gang of Four and Bush Tetras etc are? Are the Fall post-punk? I'm not joking; I'm serious. I honestly don't understand the definition people are using these days. In 1980, grouping Remain in Light with Entertainment! and Second Edition (and, hell, Dirty Mind) (and maybe even Emotional Rescue, okay maybe not) would have made perfect sense. xp

Honestly, Roxy Music and Bowie are probably the best choices, for visibility reasons if nothing else. So I'm being half facetious. (Wait, though: What about Kraftwerk????)

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

And the reason I mentioned Boney M (could just have well been Cerrone or Labelle or Grace Jones I guess) is that DISCO was a sort of bridge between glam and post-punk, right? (At least in the sense that glam influenced disco and disco influenced post-punk?)

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, "Dirty Mind* might be the best choice of all, really.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:27 (nineteen years ago)

Unless *Sheer Heart Attack* by Queen is.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't mean they weren't post-punk. I meant to say they're not Glam.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

Lou Reed - Take No Prisoners

This is also the album that bridges the gap between glam and comedy.

Lloyd Bonecutter (Lloyd Bonecutter), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)

xp But they (Talking Heads) probably got some inspiration from Bowie (and like Xgau said maybe Sparks) Which would put them in the lineage of glam, right?

Actually, my new REAL nomination though (beat this) for somebody linking glam to post-punk is George Clinton. Not sure what album I'd pick though. But he's a link for sure.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

Associates??? Not chronologically between Glam and Post-Punk of course but generically a perfect cross... the glam of Bowie, Ferry, and Eno with the post-punk ethos of the times...

lickit, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

split enz were never glam, they were prog though.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

"I didn't mean they weren't post-punk. I meant to say they're not Glam."

Not glam? What, with those shoulderpads?

http://ilyka.mu.nu/images/david_byrne_big_suit-thumb.jpg http://www.derbydeadpool.co.uk/images/celebs/glittg.jpg

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)

yes Chuch, whatever you want! Talking Heads 77 is totally glam rock.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)

Not "totally"! Just partially.

> the post-punk ethos of the times...<

See, again, I'm not sure what people mean by this. Were there any bands at the time who actually defined *themselves* as post-punk? If not, how was there a "post-punk ethos"? I mean, I love those *New York Noise* compilation CDs as much as the next guy (the new edition is really great by the way), but I wonder if said "ethos" exists only in retrospect.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)

And for pre-punk post-punkness I think I'd pick *Taking Tiger Mountain* (a dance record! especially "Third Uncle"!) over anything else by Eno by the way.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)

Also Mott the Hoople's *Brain Capers* (which is really punk-funk in spots.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

".... Skafish (or Wazmo Nariz, who may or may not be the same person)."

I've met 'em both (OK, not at the same time admittedly, but still...) and I'm pretty sure they're not!

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

ethos?? well yes it is something that can be analysed only in retrospect, but here we are, we point at a certain batch of bands and can identify features which mark them out as what we now call "post punk", perhaps not really an ethos then but certainly the characteristics are there. There were certain common tropes in terms of: chord patterns (minor keys!) rejection of blues scales (or a re-emphasis away from a blues feel in the case of acts like Joy Division who did have a vague blues in some of Sumner's soloing, but with a distinctly non-clapton-esque vibe going down) broadening of tonal pallete (synths etc) cold/eurocentricty,literary references to modernist sci-fi(Ballard)or the darker beat stuff (Burroughs) along with a sense of post disco/funk awareness of space and groove (in some cases anyway). Texturally either bathing in pools of icy reverb (Hanet productions) or artificially crisp (first GO4 album- no reverb at all...) and use of phase and flange in a distinctly non-psychedelic manner...

lickit, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)

Thanks!

So anyway...

Or the Skatt Brothers' album.

Or the first Elton Motello album, with "Jet Boy Jet Girl."

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

"Were there any bands at the time who actually defined *themselves* as post-punk? If not, how was there a "post-punk ethos"?"

In the UK at least, there were certainly an awful lot of former punk bands / musicians; and bands / musicians who had been inspired by the first wave of punk; who, by 1979, were anxious to distance themselves as far as possible from what punk was [being defined as by the media / turning into].

Consequently the ethos of those bands / musicians bore far more resemblance to the original punk ethos than it did to anything else; or indeed than anything else - including what was by then passing for "punk" - did.

(x-post)

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I don't really see how Queen, Roxy Music, and Mott the Hoople have much to do with "post-punk" per se (which traditionally = Pop Group, Raincoats, etc., etc. ...).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

UK Squeeze seems to be a good answer for me. Also 'Before And After Science'.

zeus (zeus), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:05 (nineteen years ago)

I think post-punk drew so heavily on Roxy Music, as well as Eno solo, and Bowie and Iggy's Berlin records, that it's hard for me to talk about post-punk without thinking of those records.

And please show me ONE thread on ILX where Chuck doesn't mention both Boney M and the Skatt Brothers?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

I'd say Bowie's Berlin trilogy more than "Station to Station," which I pegged on some other thread the gap between disco and prog. Maybe later Buzzcocks? Or the Smiths?

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)

Dan, check the country and teenpop threads, among scores of others (though Boney M arguably could fit on both, I guess. And Skatt Bros definitely had their country moments.)

Anyway, I wish you would explain how they don't fit, rather than complaining about me mentioning them. Musically, how are "Walk the Night" and "Nightflight to Venus" not a bridge? Space, glitter, propulsive dancebeats, noisy guitars, rods beneath coats rammed down throats -- what else do you need?

But if you want to argue that I should've said the first Cars album instead, you have a point.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:21 (nineteen years ago)

And Tim, again, I don't know that "post-punk" traditionally means *anything.* It's only in the past few years, as far as I can see, that it''s been narrowed down to the Pop Group and Raincoats etc. In 1982, as far as I remember, I could just as well have been Spandau Ballet or the Human League. (As for Mott, again: They were a glam band who, in songs like "Death May Be Your Santa Claus" at least, mixed punk with funk. How isn't that clear?)

A case could also maybe be made for the first couple 10cc LPs, I'm thinking. Or maybe not.

xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)

"I'd say Bowie's Berlin trilogy more than "Station to Station," which I pegged on some other thread the gap between disco and prog."

I tend to think Low / Heroes / Lodger (and Scary Monsters for that matter) are firmly on the post punk side rather than forming any sort of bridge.

That said, you're right, Station To Station is kind of a lazy / obvious choice.... maybe Diamond Dogs, although a lesser album, better fits this particular bill?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

I was joking but...I'm making a crazy assumption that when discussing post-punk, the initial poster has a vague and nebulous definition in his mind about what post-punk is, and I think most of us get the idea. Walk the Night is a great bridge between songs that rock and songs that dance and songs that have guitars. But I don't think it would fit in most anyone here's definitions of what post-punk is. Same with Boney M.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

>As for Mott, again: They were a glam band who, in songs like "Death May Be Your Santa Claus" at least, mixed punk with funk. How isn't that clear?<

I don't remember the tune. Apart from mixing punk and funk, does it actually sound like any post-punk bands, though?

It would be interesting to know the history of the term. I've always associated it particularly w/ British bands - PiL, early Rough Trade bands, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

I'm curious who the post-punk bands are that people associate particularly w/ Roxy Music, early Eno, and the Bowie trilogy albums.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)

"I don't know that "post-punk" traditionally means *anything.* It's only in the past few years, as far as I can see, that it''s been narrowed down to the Pop Group and Raincoats etc. In 1982, as far as I remember, I could just as well have been Spandau Ballet or the Human League."

I don't actually remember the term "Post Punk" having been about at the time; although there were seemingly hundreds of names for all the different scenes and movements and genres and sub-genres and sub-sub-genres and sub-sub-genres (Spandau Ballet would have been called "Blitz Kids" and later "New Romantics"; Human League were probably called "Futurist" to start with....); with the term "New Wave" being used as a generall catch-all for just about everything and everyone that hadn't already been established before the 1977 watershed and which didn't fit into the new narrow definition of "Punk" as having to be 90MPH, guitar-based, shouting, swearing, thrashing, spitting, pogoing, spiked hair and leather jackets with studs in.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)

What of the Doctors Of Madness?

Deluxe (Damian), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:47 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm curious who the post-punk bands are that people associate particularly w/ Roxy Music, early Eno, and the Bowie trilogy albums."

The first ones that spring to my mind would be Siouxsie & The Banshees, Magazine, Joy Division....

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

You could easily play that Mott tune (or that Skatt Bros tune) back to back with Gang of Four.

As for "post-punk," I heard it plenty in the '80s, no less for American bands than British ones. But again, it was a catch-all (pretty much the same as "new wave,"), not a specific genre., which narrowcasting I never noticed happened until the past few years.

Anyway, right now though I'm thinking the real answer to this question might be the first Foreigner album. (and they were both British *and* American, so all bases are covered!)

And since everybody will think I'm "joking" with that nomination (which I'm not, I'm thinking about their sound), just to make them happy, I'll ask: How glam were Cabaret Voltaire? I'm thinking they might be the answer that makes everybody happy. (Though the Cars were better. And glammier. And post-punkier.)


xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:49 (nineteen years ago)

"What of the Doctors Of Madness?"

Good call!

By the same token, what of Gloria Mundi?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

That seems reasonable, Stewart. I'm not familiar with those bands' entire discographies, though. Do you see Siouxsie as being more in the Roxy Music camp? Joy Division in the Bowie trilogy camp? Magazine ... ?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)

>Spandau Ballet would have been called "Blitz Kids" and later "New Romantics"; Human League were probably called "Futurist" to start with...<

Well yeah, in England. (Or MAYBE in the US, but usually only if you read Simon Frith columns.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

Chuck, early Cabaret Voltaire like "Nag Nag Nag" seems more punk to me, at least in attitude, than the Cars.

xp - Of those, the "New Romantic" tag was huge in the US.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

When I was in high school, there were "New Ro" kids.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

"Do you see Siouxsie as being more in the Roxy Music camp? Joy Division in the Bowie trilogy camp? Magazine ... ?"

If I had to match them into pairs I guess that's probably the way I'd do it.

"Well yeah, in England."

Without wishing to sound unduly nationalistic or jingoistic ('cos, believe me, I most certainly ain't) did anywhere else actually matter that much (in musical terms, I mean) between 1979 and 1984?

From where I was sitting (which admittedly was in the UK - so obviously that would have tended to affect my perspective just ever so slightly!) apart from No Wave and a few other odd isolated bands / musicians and pockets of activity, there was fuck all happening anywhere else. Even France had a better scene than America, which seemed to spend most of that time catching up with what had happened in the UK during '77 and '78.

There's certainly nowhere else I'd rather have been during that time.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:19 (nineteen years ago)

Tim, punk and post-punk are not the same thing. (And I wish Cabaret Voltaire nag nag nagged more.) (Actually, both theirs and the Cars' best stuff was maybe post *'60s* punk! What's that one Cab Voltaire song that sounds exactly like the Seeds? That song is great, but I'd say it's no more punk than, say, "Got a Lot on My Head." (And heck I was the one who nominated Cabaret Voltatire on this thread to begin with, I've got nothing againt them.) (Plus if I'm confusing enough maybe some asshole will quote me again on that stupid "Let's Agree We've Had Enough" thread on the Noize board. That would be great!)

And hey wait, what about Savage Rose? (At least I didn't say the Shaggs.)

Though ACTUALLY, if you want to define post-punk as Raincoats Delta 5 Bush Tetras Au Pairs, another possibility might be...the first Runaways album! Or at least, uh, *Horses*.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)

They did a cover of the Seeds' "No Escape."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:22 (nineteen years ago)

Raincoats Delta 5 Bush Tetras Au Pairs

That will do. It's more ILM to drag in all the stuff that doesn't rock and isn't catchy. Why not one of Bolan's shitty records, like Zip Gun.

Or what album effectively gets the rock 'n' roll out of teh glam and replaces it with [your favorite fill in the blank]. It would be helpful to have a lot of Trouser Press and New York Rocker back issues at this point.

George the Animal Steele, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

>Even France had a better scene than America, which seemed to spend most of that time catching up with what had happened in the UK during '77 and '78.<

This is my favorite thing I have seen anybody write all week. No kidding, I'm speechless.

But you really shouldn't dis France until you hear *both* Shakin Street albums. I mean it.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:26 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, speaking of England, people are forgetting something REAL obvious. If you want a great album clearly influenced by, say, Slade's gang shouts that introduced to punk the reggae elements that'd be huge in Limey post punk in the early '80s, why not just go with *The Clash* (the American edition, which had more reggae on it.) Again, I'm not joking at all. (And if that's too obvious, there's Generation X's first album. They were as much a glam band as a punk band {VERY obvious on their Ian Hunter produced followup *Valley of the Dolls*}, when you get down to it, yet "Wild Dub" was, as far as I know, the first dub version of a punk song.) (The Slits weren't very glam at all, unless mud counts as makeup.) (But then again, Jamaican music was probabably an influence on glam-rock production techniques to begin with -- In David Essex's echoey "Rock On," for instance. So I dunno. But the Clash and Generation X made it more blatant, and post-punks ran with that.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

What about the first Sex Pistols album? I really thought this was a trick question. On a side note, I can't believe how many times post-punk has been used since 1990 to describe stuff. Even today I'm reading this. Apparently anything Dischord has put out, or will ever put out is post-punk. I always thought post-punk was like the first CURE albums, or the Fall, or some other stuff from 1979-1981.

Brian Jones (Brian Jones), Friday, 10 February 2006 00:56 (nineteen years ago)

Surprised no-one's said Bauhaus - Burning from the Inside yet.

Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Tim and Chuck need their own thread.

I think of Wire's third album alot when I think of Eno/Bowie/Roxy/Pop relevance to post-punk.

Walk the Night sounds great next to Gang of Four, sure. That makes it post-punk?

The Cabaret Voltaire song that sounds like the Seeds? How about No Escape? Two vaguely nuggets-esque tracks, one being a Seeds cover hardly makes them a glam band. Have you heard the rest of the music they released on Rough Trade around that time?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

Dan, I'm honestly not trying to be snotty, but what part of "bridges the gap" don't you undersand? Why is it so hard to comprehend that the music that might share the most traits from two distinct genres might be music that's part of a different genre entirely?

(And yeah, I've got like four or five albums of Cabaret Voltaire's early stuff, which is much better than their later stuff, and much much better than their much much later stuff. As I said above, I nominated them only because they seemed like the kind of band that most people here might agree on. Perhaps was wrong. But look what I wrote: I never *said* they were glam; I *asked* if they were. Obviously it really depends on how you define the term.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)

I do think Wire's *154* is another good choice, by the way. (Actually, I think *most* of the stuff nominated here -- except for maybe the couple bands I never heard of -- are good choices, to be honest. I'm just not so willing to discount stuff that's maybe less obvious.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:30 (nineteen years ago)

(Actually, I also think the question is kind of silly. But that's part of what makes it fun.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:31 (nineteen years ago)

Blister on My Thumb by the Foleyolos

LoneNut, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:34 (nineteen years ago)

If Talking Heads are mentioned, Television should be mentioned too. Although I consider both more the missing link between punk and new wave/postrock rather than having anything to do with glam.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

Television is a good choice, too! (And Richard Hell and the Voidoids for that matter!)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:41 (nineteen years ago)

And duh, the Electric Eels!!

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:49 (nineteen years ago)

Or the Styrenes. Or the Mirrors.

Hell, the whole frigging '70s population of Cleveland, probably.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 01:52 (nineteen years ago)

How are Television related to glam?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

well, bowie covered verlaine's "kingdom come," for one thing. (doubt that's the end, though, and i'm not sure what geir was thinking. either way, i'd be extremely surprised if those guys didn't have plenty of roxy music and lou reed albums in their collections.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:05 (nineteen years ago)

"Lee Black Childers: I met Richard Lloyd in Los Angeles when I was working for Mott the Hoople, and he was a rock&roll fan, he had shocking pink lipstick, his hair was brown, and he was just hanging out with bands. It wasn't long thereafter I was in New York and he comes up to me and he's platinum blond, completely punked out."

-- *From the Velvets to the Voidoids," p. 122

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

Simple Minds - Reel To Real Cacophony

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

And hell, the name "Neon Boys" just plain SOUNDS glam. And I'd say there's a certain glam swishiness to Verlaine's singing, too. I dunno, to me the connection isn't far-fetched at all.

xp

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:12 (nineteen years ago)

as far as the thread title goes, do you really need to go much further than roxy/bowie? i mean REALLY, PEOPLE.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

and iggy too.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:23 (nineteen years ago)

But it's *fun* to go further, Scott! Jeez. Though actually, I just noticed that "competently" in the title; I had been reading it as "completely" until now. I think most of the people I nominated were a lot better than just competent (as were Roxy and Bowie.) (Unless you count, like, *Let's Dance* or *Avalon* or whatever.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

Ultravox first or second albums.I know it was essentially a Roxy Music rip but the time frame is right & as a kid who was unfamiliar with Roxy these albums were just weird "punk" albums that took me back to their influences.Time has given me perspective but back then these guys blew my mind.To be 17 again right?

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

and lou too.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

joy division coulda done a great cover of disco mystic. section 25 wished they had a song as good as disco mystic.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

were eyeless in gaza influenced at all by jobriath?

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

Kind of surprised nobody mentioned Gary Numan (til now) either.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

SOUND ON SOUND by Red Noise marked Bill Nelson's full merging of glam and post-punk. Despite the massive stylistic shift & the espousal of all that nouveau jerkiness, Nelson's clearly unwilling/unable to shake his glam conditioning. I remember hating this record when I first heard it as a young teen-- in retrospect, I'd say it's arguably holding up better than Be Bop Deluxe.


doug watson (solid air), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, see, when you get to ultravox or even metro or doctors of madness or even bebop deluxe you are talking roxy music all the way. well, not all the way, but half way. so why not just say roxy.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

Or Tim Curry. Or David Werner.

xp x 2

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:30 (nineteen years ago)

I swear I never even heard of Doctors of Madness til today.

I have the Metro album on vinyl, though! (Is that an expensive rare cult record now? If so, yay!)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

or the rocky horror soundtrack.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

it's not that expensive.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

Oh well.

(And actually, the Cars were Roxy at least half of the way, too.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:33 (nineteen years ago)

If you're going to say Simple Minds' 'Real to Real Cacophony', then you'd probably have to say their first album 'Life in a Day'. And if you're going to say that, you'd have to say Magazine's 'Real Life'. That was going to be my original suggestion, though it may not be early enough.

Patrick South (Patrick South), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

how about the band *Roxy*? Ex-Wackers, I believe. Later some of them formed *The Dudes*. Where do The Dudes stand in all of this?

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

I'm just gonna say Adam & The Ants. Total glam-rock beats. Total face-paint. Total post-punk, um, other stuff. And they were an actual *POST-PUNK* band. And they did it very competently.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

anybody who enjoys bizarroglamhardrockinsanity should check out Bricks by The Hello People. Not many mime bands made it out of the 60's alive, but the Hello People lived to tell the tale.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:39 (nineteen years ago)

as far as the thread title goes, do you really need to go much further than roxy/bowie? i mean REALLY, PEOPLE.
-- scott seward (skotro...), February 10th, 2006.

Because again Roxy/Bowie would seem to have more to do with inspiring New Wave then "post-punk per se" (though Stewart raised a few examples - don't know if Siouxsie really qualifies as "post-punk per se," though) so if the original poster was not thinking that "post-punk" = all New Wave made after 1978, then maybe they're not the best example of the competent bridging of the gap.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:40 (nineteen years ago)

Real post-punks wanted to rip it up and start again, after all!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

"Because again Roxy/Bowie would seem to have more to do with inspiring New Wave then "post-punk per se""

You are a crazy person. Of course they inspired post-punk.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)

I think it's funny anyone would want to "competently" combine these two genres.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:45 (nineteen years ago)

>Real post-punks wanted to rip it up and start again, after all!<

Tim, that's just silly.

All of which brings us back to George Clinton. (You don't deny he must have inspired the Gang of Four and Pop Group, do you Tim?) (But wait...was MILES DAVIS glam?? I wonder.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:46 (nineteen years ago)

"Ian’s main love in life was music and many lunchtimes were spent at the Victoria Park flat listening to the MC5, Roxy Music and the Velvet Underground. His fanaticism for David Bowie, and in particular his version of Jaques Brel’s song "My Death," was taken at the time to be a fashionable fascination and merely Ian’s recognition of Bowie’s mime, choreographed by Lindsay Kemp."

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

Ian Curtis was no doubt a HUGE Hello People Fanatic as well!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

"I think it's funny anyone would want to "competently" combine these two genres."

Adam & The Ants did it! So did Bow Wow Wow!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

Well, with which bands that are commonly thought of as "post-punk per se" were Roxy/Bowie an explicit influence? Stewart says Magazine were, I guess, sort of Roxy Music-like, at least. (How much so?) And that Joy Division somehow had something to do with Bowie's "trilogy" albums. (Again, how much so?)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

but what part of "bridges the gap" don't you undersand?

all of it I guess! I give up.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

By definition posat-punk is after punk.Therefore Roxy & Bowie can only be influences.And Magazine "Real Life" is an excellent option.Although i'll stick with Ultravox.And Doctors of Madness while being good were done by 1977.Didn't Richard Strange have a solo career though?

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

>All of which brings us back to George Clinton. (You don't deny he must have inspired the Gang of Four and Pop Group, do you Tim?)<

I don't know. Probably.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

And how do Chicory Tip fit into all this? (Didn't they dress up like ducks or something?)

And actually. nobody has mentioned PETER GABRIEL, either. Thank you very much. (In 1980, his third Peter Gabriel album was right up there with Second Edition Entertainment! Scary Monsters Remain in Light with all the post-punk post-prog post-funk fans you know. And he used to dress up like a FLOWER and stuff. So I think he may well our man.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

"By definition posat-punk is after punk"

right, which is why i'm going with Adam & The Ants. Although part of me just wants to say Denim and be done with it.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:53 (nineteen years ago)

he used to dress like a flower but he didn't sing like one.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:53 (nineteen years ago)

No but he eventually sang like a sledgehammer (which is as un-glam as you can get.)

Oh wait, Doctors of Madness was that reissue from two years ago that nobody even heard of before then, right? i have that! It's good! (And I think Dan put it out, duh!)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:55 (nineteen years ago)

I just remembered that the No Wave band Mars were said to be Roxy Music influenced. Their early stuff. They were originally called China, which could've been a glam band's name probably.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

Hee Hee.I could live with Denim.Damn now i've got to go listen to them.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

>"By definition posat-punk is after punk"<

By definition a bridge connects things on both ends of the bridge.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)

i think this is all i have to say about doctors of madness:


post-prog death-glam. from 76. the pistols weren't trying to save me from THIS, were they? what a weird hybrid. yeah, bowie/roxy but hammill/nelson too and glimpses of some weird future where The Final Cut, Tonic For The Troops, and Tonio K inspire punk fiddle players to swallow razorblades and hit you with flowers. this future never happened. and for the record, i kinda hate anyone who has ever been described as a "punk" fiddle player. those dudes in the kilts and mohawks. you know the ones. but hey, waitaminute, Rush+Green Day=Yellow Card. They're top 40 or something, aren't they? Yeah, but they suck. And they don't have songs as good as "Suicide City" or "In Camera (Huis Clos)" Or "Out!" which would make a great punk anthem if it were sped-up and it lost the phasing and lugubrious phrasing. Is it a gay anthem? could be. Certainly the part that goes "I'm so incredibly down today/Nothing seems to go right/Just when I seemed set up with this guy/He flipped and said he'd seen the light" could be read that way. That and the title. what a confusing time. the picture on the back tells the tale. Pub rockers with glam war-paint on their faces and punk hair. You didn't know if you were coming or going! anyway, thanks to Kid Strange, Urban Blitz, Stoner (a bass player named Stoner! Nice!), Peter Di Lemma, and John Leckie for the album. And thanks to Rene Eyre for an album cover that just keeps on giving. Love Kid's lisp too. It wins one of my top spots. (Right behind Pearls Before Swine, Legendary Pink Dots, Blow Monkeys, and Current 93.)

-- scott seward (skotro...), September 14th, 2004.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)

>"By definition posat-punk is after punk"<


and bowie and roxy were making post-punk records after, um, punk too.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

Scott i had both albums when they came out & i thought they were martians are something.as a matter of fact it's possible Ultravox was ripping these guys off.Doctors just never had the tunes.Great sound though.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:03 (nineteen years ago)

By 1979 Roxy were making ABC albums.I liked them but all edges had been completely smoothed down by that point.And i suppose Scary Monsters would qualify yes.Or Lodger for that matter.Wow Bowie used to just casually toss out great albums.I really took him for granted back then.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:06 (nineteen years ago)

both first albums by japan and simple minds are good glampunk/bowie hybrids.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:06 (nineteen years ago)

i think lodger should be on any list of great post-punk albums.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:08 (nineteen years ago)

when talking about bridging the gap here, the reason why people, myself included, are talking about stuff like Roxy, is we're thinking of the bands that manage to have feet in both camps, sonically, aesthethically, attitude, whatever. Nobody is saying Roxy Music IS a post-punk band. We're saying many Post-punk bands ARE Roxy Music bands.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:09 (nineteen years ago)

Manifesto came out in 1979 though, and that album was a big hit with future new romantics/postpunkers/hairfarmers.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)

x-post

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)

"We're saying many Post-punk bands ARE Roxy Music bands."

Hahaha! very true.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:11 (nineteen years ago)

right there with you Scott.It kind of gets forgotten about because it didn't have a great single on it.Scary Monsters gets xtra credit because of Ashes to Ashes & Heroes has the title track.Hell The Idiot is a great post punk album too.Bowie was on a roll in those days.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:12 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, Lodger (which I like a lot too) had "Boys Keep Swinging" and "I Am the DJ," which (in Detroit at least) got as much airplay as anything off *Scary Monsters* at the time, I think. Though, yeah, maybe in retrospect people remember "Ashes to Ashes" more.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 03:15 (nineteen years ago)

I've always been a big *Manifesto* fan too. I kind of thought it was downhill for Roxy after that though. (What was next, *Flesh & Blood*? That was okay, I guess, way better than *Avalon*, which is the one that people seem to remember by them from that era.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 03:17 (nineteen years ago)

think this is all i have to say about doctors of madness:

I'd buy a DVD of the TV doc they did decades ago. I saw it on TV and they didn't even have an import record you could find in the US! Or at least Pennsylvania.


George the Animal Steele, Friday, 10 February 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)

i can't help you there, George, but I can give you Deep Purple performing Hush on Playboy After Dark in 1969:

http://www.youtube.com/w/Deep-Purple---Hush---Playboy-After-Dark%2C-1969?v=1WyFL6Mwlv4&search=deep%20purple

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

You guys still haven't given me many names of "post-punk per se" bands that have a lot to do with Roxy Music and Bowie. We got Magazine and we got Joy Division ... kind of, maybe, at least.

I mentioned Mars. And Steve Treatment who was very Marc Bolan-influenced.

Don't tell me ABC cuz they were New Ro.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:00 (nineteen years ago)

"You guys still haven't given me many names of "post-punk per se" bands that have a lot to do with Roxy Music and Bowie."


ALL OF THEM!!!!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:06 (nineteen years ago)

I don't hear a whole lot of Roxy Music and Bowie in PiL, Swell Maps, the Fall, the Raincoats, Young Marble Giants, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

Tim, I think your version of Post-Punk is very Wanna Buy a Bridge-centric. Nothing wrong with that, but what about Family Fodder, Edith Nylon, Kevin Dunn, The Fans, Section 25, Crispy Ambulance, Clock DVA, Ultravox, Wire, The Associates etc. One argument is that some of those are New Wave and not Post-Punk, but I'd say there's a subtle difference and an argument can be made that many of these bands were both, while some were more one then the other, and others are only one and not the other. And tell me you don't hear any of Iggy's "The Idiot" in PiL.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:21 (nineteen years ago)

Well, OK, out of that lot, why are the Fans being specifically identified as a post-punk band? Were they not just an artsy American New Wave band? I think you're identifying them as "post-punk" precisely because they were Roxy Music influenced, but I'm not sure why!

I don't know The Idiot; is that a particularly glam-oriented Iggy record? I don't think of Iggy as being that much of a glam guy - I mean, sort of; he's sort of glammed out on the cover of Raw Power.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:43 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know some of those British groups, Dan, but I do recognize some of the names as probably being bands that people consider to be "post-punk per se," so maybe those are some more good examples of Roxy/Bowie-oriented post-punk people.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:47 (nineteen years ago)

lou/vu/eno/roxy/bowie/iggy. that's yer post-punk totem pole. and, you know, actual *Punk*. duh. everything after that (can, kraftwerk, dub, psych, whatever) comes after that stuff. unless you are throbbing gristle and then it is martin denny all the way.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:51 (nineteen years ago)

Lydia Lunch woulda pooped on yer totem pole.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:57 (nineteen years ago)

Lydia loved Iggy. She wanted to be Iggy in a big way.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 04:58 (nineteen years ago)

my fave lydia album after the 8 eyed spy album (Love the Funhouse sax on that record) is the one she made with my all-time favorite post-punk glam band from L.A., The Weirdos.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

duran duran "rio "or kiss " dynasty"

retrogurl, Friday, 10 February 2006 05:02 (nineteen years ago)

Starz - S/T Debut

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:03 (nineteen years ago)

Idiot is not particularly glam. It's very post-punk actually, quite chilly in a Magazine/PiL/Joy Division/Wire manner. A less arty Low.

Maybe I conflate arty New Wave with Post-Punk, maybe the Fans are a bad example. I dunno.

There's probably more post-punk in the Roxy/Bowie/Eno/Iggy vein then in the Wanna Buy A Bridge thing. Maybe it's a Northern UK vs. Southern UK thing. Manchester and Sheffield vs. London.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

nazgul, s/t

simon jr., Friday, 10 February 2006 05:09 (nineteen years ago)

"Lydia loved Iggy. She wanted to be Iggy in a big way."

Well, yeah, and Ozzy Osbourne was a big Paul McCartney fan. Which bands have more in common, though, Black Sabbath and the Beatles or the Stooges and Teenage Jesus and the Jerks?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:09 (nineteen years ago)

Dan, what you say is interesting and kind of the exact answer I was looking for. actually. Are you talking again about some of those bands you mentioned before (Crispy Ambulance, Section 25, Clock DVA, etc.)?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)

What about the food item that most competently bridges the gap between fruit and vegetable?

Beet?
Cantaloupe?
Tomato?
Watermelon?
Banana?

Brian Jones (Brian Jones), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:11 (nineteen years ago)

Though I would say that there do seem to have been a lot of little *aesthetically extreme* bands that turn up on comps like the Messthetics series who were less high profile than the Rough Trade/Wanna Buy a Bridge bands, but perhaps had more in common with them than the Roxy/Bowie bands. (xp)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:15 (nineteen years ago)

i was kidding. you are more right about lydia than about the others you have mentioned. she was always more of an artiste/bookworm than a musician. i don't think she even likes punk music. i think the no wave stuff was coming from a different place than the brit post-punk stuff. or maybe i just don't consider them the same thing.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:20 (nineteen years ago)

it's lcd soundsystem, son. eclectic warrior!

jimmy morphine, Friday, 10 February 2006 05:23 (nineteen years ago)

I still think PiL, Fall, Swell Maps, Raincoats, Young Marble Giants don't really reside too close to that totem pole either, Scott.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:24 (nineteen years ago)

you honestly don't hear v.u. in any of those groups?

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:26 (nineteen years ago)

Not so much. How so? To me, the V.U. are a particular kind of guitar band and I don't hear much of them in those groups, really.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:28 (nineteen years ago)

nikki sudden is coming to the island next month to play at the brewpub. i'm gonna ask him about his bowie-love.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:28 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, you know, Swell Maps obviously had some type of glam-oriented aspect, which you can see in pictures of them. I'm just not sure how much you hear Bowie or other glam stars in their music.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:31 (nineteen years ago)

dude, mo tucker alone influenced most of the bands on cherry red in 1981.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:32 (nineteen years ago)

'81-'82 is Chuck Warner's cut-off point for the Messthetics series, so yeah, maybe some of those bands qualify, too lol.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 05:39 (nineteen years ago)

can i say scritti politti ?
dead or alive "sophisticated boom boom"

retrogurl, Friday, 10 February 2006 05:44 (nineteen years ago)

I associate glam (what T.Rex and Slade and the Sweet had in common with Roxy and Bowie and Mott, and proto-disco, like on Nicky Siano's Legendary The Gallery, and P-Funk, and electric Miles Davis)(and the Stones, and the Velvets, and Big Star, and sometimes the Beatles) with a rowdy, flashy, loud, aggressive,grandiose, paranoid, yet tracks on sleeve, boogie on, silver cokehead type of youngblood (Miles and George Clinton were more middle age crazy, and/or getting their latest wind).But all were at least young at heart, kinda dumb and kinda smart. Some sounded a lot smarter than others, finding enough instant gratification in the icing (and other fuel), that they could work hard and smart at challening themselves and their audiences, while others did not. I think of post-punk as being those (like Go4, Joy D., PiL) who challenged punkthrodoxy, and went for something like the gnarlier aspects of Roxy and Bowie especially, vs. MTV Wave (Duran Duran and 1000 more) who glossed the poppier aspects of Roxy and Bowie especially.("New Wave" quickly became a very vague term, not very useful,to us record store salesweasles, once it didn't have the Pistols to be a more reassuring Alternative to.) "Poppier" often meant, in the early 80s, that you couldn't get too grotty, and boogie was def out on MTV, evn though MTV Wave required a cheesy little beat (this was before Hair Metal's glam roots showed up much, and sort of brought back the boogie, or at least Great White did.) So I think of Bowie and Roxy especially as being pre-post-punk as well as "pre-"punk, trendwise. (But the Stones were punky and glammy and challenging at times, and so were the Stooges, and Sly: Exile On Mainstreet and all the Stooges albums and There's A Riot Goin' On took a lot of getting used to, for a lot of us.)(And in this sense, Broken English, not Some Girls, seemed like the Last Great Stones Album [in, what, '77? Punk disco, stashed in MF's tabloid duchess, geezerette musk, was pretty different at the time])(still is)Speaking of France, seems like Metal Urbain and Metal Boys featuring China were as grubby and gnarly and twistedly poppy as any bridge between glam-to-post-punk might be.

don, Friday, 10 February 2006 06:25 (nineteen years ago)

The Smiths' first album

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 10 February 2006 06:37 (nineteen years ago)

i can't help you there, George, but I can give you Deep Purple performing Hush on Playboy After Dark in 1969:

I have this, the sound track anyway, on one of the Deep Purple deluxe editions from last year.

I swear I never even heard of Doctors of Madness til today.

About a year after the special I was able to snag a double album. Really wish I still had it. My mom went insane, etc...

Starz - S/T Debut

Exclamation point. Salacious material and filth included.

Let's invoke Michael des Barres bands post Silverhead but not Detective. Chequered Past. Stuff Earl Slick did post Earl Slick Band, which is first Silver Condor record.

George the Animal Steele, Friday, 10 February 2006 07:50 (nineteen years ago)

n retrospect, I'd say it's arguably holding up better than Be Bop Deluxe.

Speak for yourself. Get BeBop's reissue of Live in the Air Age.

George the Animal Steele, Friday, 10 February 2006 07:51 (nineteen years ago)

The Psychedelic Furs - Talk Talk Talk (1981)

a top 200 all-time album for me. still sounds fooking sweet 25 years later! it's glam like humphrey bogart, and post-punk like mr jones.

Brian Jones (Brian Jones), Friday, 10 February 2006 07:53 (nineteen years ago)

"But you really shouldn't dis France until you hear *both* Shakin Street albums. I mean it."

Not to mention Angel Face, Asphalt Jungle, Les Dogs, Edith Nylon, Les Frenchies, Gazoline, Guilty Razors, Loose Heart, L.U.V., Marie Et Les Garcons, Metal Urbain, La Souris Delinguee, Starshooter, Stinky Toys,
Taxi Girl or Telephone, obviously, right?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 09:37 (nineteen years ago)

"Ultravox first or second albums.I know it was essentially a Roxy Music rip but the time frame is right & as a kid who was unfamiliar with Roxy these albums were just weird "punk" albums that took me back to their influences.Time has given me perspective but back then these guys blew my mind.To be 17 again right?"

OTM in every conceivable respect.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm just gonna say Adam & The Ants. Total glam-rock beats. Total face-paint. Total post-punk, um, other stuff. And they were an actual *POST-PUNK* band. And they did it very competently."

Without wishing to nit-pick, the original incarnation of Adam & The Ants (by which I mean the bondage / S&M fixated sociopaths who recorded "Young Parisians", "Deutsche Girls", "Cartrouble", "Zerox" and Dirk Wears White Sox rather than the camp glitter-rock pantomime act that emerged from their ashes in 1980) were very definitely, by every definition that I've ever been aware of, a punk band.

Dirk Wears White Sox would be an interesting nomination 'though.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 09:52 (nineteen years ago)

"By definition posat-punk is after punk."

You might be forgiven for thinking so but unfortunately the term "post punk" is a misleading misnomer and reality ain't quite that simple.

This thread is littered with bands who were musically (and, I would argue, if I had the time the energy or the inclination, attitudinally) "post punk" both before and during punk.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:04 (nineteen years ago)

"Oh wait, Doctors of Madness was that reissue from two years ago that nobody even heard of before then, right?"

I can assure you that everyone who was paying attention to the UK punk / post-punk scene had heard of them.

Even if they hadn't heard of them before Dave Vanian joined them in 1978, they certainly heard of them when he did.

Not that it helped their album sales much.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)

what about the birthday party?

Michael J McGonigal (mike mcgonigal), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)

What about Killing Joke?

.... for and on behalf of Alex In NYC (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:17 (nineteen years ago)

This is my kinda thread! Some comments:

I think part of that legend comes from Johnny Rotten playing that song ("The People You Were Going To") on the infamous radio show he did while still a Sex Pistol.

Except he didn't play that song, he played "The Institute of Mental Health (Burning)", which isn't remotely punky and doesn't sound mych like Van der Graaf either.

How glam were Cabaret Voltaire?

Cabaret Voltaire always always ALWAYS said the biggest influence on then when they started was Roxy Music, esp. a gig they played in Sheffield ca. '72. Music AND dress.

"Do you see Siouxsie as being more in the Roxy Music camp? Joy Division in the Bowie trilogy camp? Magazine ... ?"

Pretty much everyone was in the "Bowie camp". The "Roxy camp" was a subset. How many Roxy fans didn't like Bowie? Or hadn't been Bowie fans?

Because again Roxy/Bowie would seem to have more to do with inspiring New Wave then "post-punk per se

BRIAN ENO WAS IN ROXY MUSIC!!!!!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)

And on that bombshell....

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 11:08 (nineteen years ago)

I was thinking "Are we not men, we are Devo" when I saw the question, mostly based on the steady drum beats. I think the Adam Ant/Bow Wow Wow people are right too.

JB Young, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

That said, you're right, Station To Station is kind of a lazy / obvious choice

Are you calling me out? Am I gonna have to throw down?

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

Dadaismus, I know, but again, I don't see that Eno is some great totemistic figure for Fall, PiL, Pop Group, etc., etc, either. I questioned the 'Roxy/Bowie/Eno were gods for them all" assertion because I don't hear it so much in a lot of the bands I would associate with "post-punk" per se. Stewart and Dan (and perhaps others - you yourself w/ assertion that there is significant glam residue in Cabaret Voltaire) have provided some examples.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

Hole, Live Through This

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

Keith Levene, 1979 - "There's not much you can do with a synthesizer that Brian Eno hasn't already done"

... probably not the exact quote. I doubt very much that the Fall were influenced by Roxy Music but, then again, I don't know - Martin Bramah had a touch of the Phil Manzaneras about him

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

Another vital thing to remember about Bowie and Eno - their fans developed interests in bands/artists that Bowie and Eno had recommended or championed, that means: The Velvets and Krautrock especially

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

"Are you calling me out? Am I gonna have to throw down?"

What language is this? If I'm understanding you correctly then I must assure you I'm most certainly not asking you out - and even if I was, the last thing I'd want would be for you to go down.

It really doesn't bear thinking about.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

Did the British punk-era generation really get turned out to Krautrock via Eno or Bowie? I thought Can, Amon Duul, T. Dream and Faust were fairly high profile themselves.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

by singing with bing crosby and iggy stooge, bowie most competently bridged the gap between anthony newley fans and pretty things fans. he truly was a heckuva bridge-builder. he invented goth, you know. jesus, i must be bored. better get back to work.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

johnny rotten played krautrock on the radio and did you know that faust records were practically GIVEN away in the u.k. in the 70's? all part of a promotional scheme. they went for like 99 pence or something.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

were there any krautrock bands that toured the u.k. with any success? now i'm being serious and actually want to know something.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

These guys invented Goth:

http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/08.21.03/gifs/count-0334.jpg

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

Can, Amon Duul II, and Tangerine Dream all toured the UK - fairly regularly I think, well Can and T. Dream. I think Tangerine Dream were a particularly popular live draw!

I can only talk from experience (see my Musical Education thread). My sister was a glam rocker and a punk - she got into the Velvets as a direct result of Bowie, she also had a Neu! album, which I'm pretty sure she didn't buy on the recommendation of Dave Brock!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

What language is this? If I'm understanding you correctly then I must assure you I'm most certainly not asking you out - and even if I was, the last thing I'd want would be for you to go down.

I'm trying to start a Biggie/Tupac style feud over the fact that you called my Station to Station choice lazy. I can see you're not gonna be much help.

Anybody else have choice words over the idea that Station to Station is the most competent bridge between glam and post punk? Bring it on, fuckers!!!!

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

Tangerine Dream were pretty popular in the states too. Lots of Yes/Prog/HeadMusik types loved them in the 70's. I think Hawkwind could have been a lot bigger in the States if they had toured a lot here. They had a pretty dedicated little following.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

> thought Can, Amon Duul, T. Dream and Faust were fairly high profile themselves. <

On what planet? Certainly not in the States -- well, except for Tangerine Dream, maybe. I remember being in Germany in the early '80s, while I was already writing for the Voice, and almost thinking I was *discovering* those groups. I don't even think I remember the term "kraut rock" being used for them until, hell, the late '80s at least. You'd hear Can mentioned sometimes when people were talking about PiL, but honestly, I think people now overrate the extent to which kraut rock was a reference point in punk or new wave when it happened. (KRAFTWERK were, to an extent, but you didn't name them.) I honestly think Amon Duul and Faust were really obscure to American post-punks, at least, and maybe to Brits too. (In my metal book, published in 1991, I group Haspshash and the Coloured Coat in with the "unthwarted-by-talent improvise-freely-and-babble-Krishna-nonsense-atop-an-obsessive-bongo-groove unidentified-flying-rock" of Amon Duul, the Godz, Yoko, Can, Faust, and the Chambers Brothers; even then, I don't know that I'd heard anybody call it kraut-rock yet.

Tim, I could go back and check, but refresh my memory: Who do you think this thread belongs to? You keep nixing all the other bands everybody else nominates because, um, they don't sound like the Raincoats or whatever. Which is fine, but who does that leave for you?

(Wait, maybe somebody SHOULD nominate Yoko, come to think of it.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

Faust toured the UK once. With Henry Cow. They had pneumatic drills and stuff onstage, a TV set and a pinball machine... oh, and Peter Blegvad too.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

"On what planet? Certainly not in the States"

I asked which Krautrock bands had a presence in the U.K. Not the states.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

(xpost) Krautrock wasn't obscure in the UK - it was a British journalist who invented the term after all. "Faust Tapes" was released in 1973 for 49p and it sold like hotcakes, even if most people played it once and made a frisbee of it. Amon Duul II were more popular in the UK than in Germany - as were Can for that matter. My sister had a Neu! single in 1972 - she was 14 years old at the time!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:11 (nineteen years ago)

In some ways Krautrock was more obscure in Germany than it was in the UK!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

Tangerine Dream fans at my high school, I think, were likely to also like Jan Hammer and Stanley Clarke and Jean Luc Ponty and Patrick Moraz and Michael Oldfield and Jean Michael Jarre and stuff like that. They were prog fans and fusion and proto-new-age-though-they-didn't-know-it=yet fans (and probably, at least until punk happened, the most adventurous listeners of any kids I knew at the time). (xp)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Tangerine Dream were always much more of a hippy band. I never heard them referred to as Krautrock at all until probably Julian Cope started raving about them.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

... probably because only 6 people had heard "Electronic Meditation" and 6 million had heard "Phaedra"

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

... ha ha, that reminds me, when I was about 13, we had this short-lived "Rock Music Appreciation" society at school and I remember bringing in my big sister's copy of "The Velvet Underground & Nico" and this kind of hippy kid called David Judge brought his big brother's copy of "Dance of the Lemmings"! We were both on the same team! (The teacher in charge of the class preferred Little Feat)

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I was asking about how high profile those bands were in England, Chuck.

"Tim, I could go back and check, but refresh my memory: Who do you think this thread belongs to?"

I think there have been a lot of interesting cases made. My original thought was really glam oriented post-punk guys: Steve Treatment and Ziro Baby. The idea of Roxy Music and Bowie as post-punk oriented glam guys, on the other hand, was what I was questioning. (If the Berlin trilogy Bowie albums are "post-punk" records, then it was post-punk happening while post-punk proper was happening. Is a record like Heroes still a GLAM record, though?)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

Or Eno's solo albums, for that matter - are those glam records?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

Sure, why not? (Well, not Another Green World, maybe. But Here Come the Warm Jets and Taking Tiger Mountain, definitely.) (Anything with "jet" in the title is obviously glam by deinition, obviously.)

I mean, I get the idea you have extremely limited definitions of both genres. Which is fine, I guess, though I don't know what purpose the limits would serve. And either way, I don't know what your definition *is*, beyond "stuff I heard somebody call glam or post-punk once."

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:42 (nineteen years ago)

And anyway, the real answer is obviously Shox Lumania.

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:43 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't heard Warm Jets in a while - I guess I can see that it's glam. You can call it a limited definition if you want, Chuck, but "glam" generally means Ziggy Stardust and Marc Bolan and Gary Glitter, etc. I still not really sure that Heroes is a glam record. Nor am I sure that Television were much of a glam band in spite of the fact that Richard Lloyd wore pink nail polish prior to the band's inception.

And if someone wants to call Duran Duran a post-punk band, that's fine. I'm just saying that it doesn't fit my sense of what that term means.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)

American bands who were much more glam than Television: White Witch, Debris, Zolar X, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)

None of Bowie's albums after "Pin Ups" are glam. "Here Come the Warm Jets", it's pure glam in bits, odder in other bits.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)

Kiss were probably the most popular american glam band.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

... after "Diamond Dogs" I mean, and that's the arse end of glam. Glam was dead by 1975. In the UK I mean.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

it was just getting started in the states by 1975!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:53 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah! That footage of the Sex Pistols concerts in the south on their US tour. People who showed up to see them seem like they were all glammed out.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

Ha ha, probably (xpost). In the UK there was a period from mid-75 to mid-76 when there wasn't really anything happening and a lot of glam kids (like my older sister) just bought soul and (proto) disco records

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

... and those are the kids that ended up as Punk Rockers and then later Soul Boys and (god help us) New Romantics

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

it really is all about touring in the u.s. if slade and t.rex had toured constantly in the states it would have taken off sooner. it's why foghat are a household name in the states and status quo are a footnote.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

... and no-one in Britain owns a Foghat album, I know

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

I was wondering why this thread had so many answers.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

Kiss really ran with the need for new product. And casablanca records.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

alice cooper were more popular than kiss, weren't they? (they and/or he definitely had more hit singles. or at least alice cooper had BIGGER hit singles. though it was close, i guess. did kiss really sell more albums? in detroit it was kinda hard to tell.) (and actually, the argument could be made that aerosmith and queen, sort of both glam bands at least IN RETROSPECT, were bigger than either.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

i'm also not sure what "pure glam" would mean. didn't all glam albums have weird stuff on them? or most of them anyway? (though i guess you could say "pure glam" means stuff that sounds like "bang a gong" and "rebel rebel" and "ballroom blitz," and you might have a point.)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno. Kiss ended up selling a helluva lot of records. but, yeah, alice did too.

i'm kinda wondering if by 72/73 - when u.k. glam was hitting a peak - if american audineces weren't also just a little bubblegummed out. serious bubblegum efforts were being cranked out left and right up until the mid-70's and glam might have been overkill/overload in the u.s.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

that jaded banana splits-savvy u.s. audience might have had little need for slade even if they had toured relentlessly. and the stuff that did come a little later, alice, queen, kiss, was suitably hardrock enough probably for the heartland. (not that slade wasn't hardrock. maybe slade was a bad example.) was the sweet's first u.s. chart action ballroom blitz? i sure loved ballroom blitz in the 70's. and then some.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

The Only Ones.

Bidfurd (Bidfurd), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know whether the rock 'n' roll element (as in 50s rock 'n' roll) element of UK glam would have sat that well in the US

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)

they don't make rosters like this anymore:

http://www.kissfaq.com/casa/1974.htm#1974


kiss, t-rex, parliament, fanny, and the hudson brothers.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:21 (nineteen years ago)

"(as in 50s rock 'n' roll)"

The mudrock element. yeah, i don't know, happy days and sha na na were huge in the 70's, but later on a little bit. people were still getting over the 60's fascination with the 20's.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

Almost all the minor glam acts in the UK were 50s revivalists in one way or another

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

... well I suppose they weren't really glam acts but Gary Glitter (who was glam); The Glitter Band; Mud; Showaddywaddy, The Rubettes etc

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)

I think "Little Willy" was a decent size hit in the U.S. I wonder how high it got.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

who the hell was buying Smokie albums in the U.S. in 1979? That's what I want to know. as a chinnichap fan, i own them now, but i don't remember them at all back then. maybe they were in my sister's teen magz.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

#3! xp

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

>who the hell was buying Smokie albums in the U.S. in 1979?<

the same people who were buying nick gilder albums in 1978 (and who, in 1980, would be buying pat benatar albums?)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

Simon Frith wrote about the Japanese cult of Smokie, long after Smokie floated away.Also, I remember this friend whose British cousins used to send him records, and we were watching Slade's American debut, on The Midnight Special, I think, and he said, "These guys are never going to make it over here, they're too British." But he predicted T.Rex would make it over here, to some extent, because Bolan was learning how to boogie, and boogie was getting to be the thing; not nec big on Top Forty, but on FM and album sales and in live shows. (This was before the Southern Rock media package; boogie seemed to be mainly Brits and Americans, especially Southerners, covering/imitating them.) We did think of Roxy as Progressive and kind of glam, and King Crimson too (At least the way they dressed and lit their live shows, and on some early songs like "Twentieth Century Schizoid Man."). But we noticed how many (American)people liked the Roxy music except for Ferry's voice, and figured they'd be mostly about albums and FM, which they were until "Love Is The Drug," which was considered rock disco,"but" not bad. If they had hit singles in the offical glam ers of the early 70s, and were considered glam by most people, they might not have outlived it Bowie was smart enough to keep ch-ch-changing, and not get too identified with any one trend (and yeah, Tim, his albums with Eno were para-punk,as well as pre-post-punk, but then pre-"hardcore" punk was more inclusive). Why were Slade songs finally hits in America, when covered by 80s hair metal bands? They were macho glam, like the Sweet, but yeah Skot, they didn't have the bubblegum songs, or at least not the kind that Chapman-Chin laid on the Sweet. Plus didn't have various makes-more-sense-to-Brits elements of Slade, just the sunlamp tans, peroxide, and butch flash boogie.)Did any punk or post punk bands ever do anything with Slade songs and/or sound? How does the New Wave Of British Heavy Metal fit in to all this?

don, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

>Did any punk or post punk bands ever do anything with Slade songs and/or sound? <

Besides the Clash, you mean? (And all of oi! ?)

xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

Simon Frith wrote about the Japanese cult of Smokie, long after Smokie floated away

They are still very popular in Germany and Norway.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

Metal Urbain would be my pick. I was kind of gobsmacked to read in an extensive UGLY THINGS article that Roxy was their key influence, but it clicks: the atonal synth, the campy vocals and the ironic lyrics. Punker than punk guitar on top, though.

Soukesian, Friday, 10 February 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm trying to start a Biggie/Tupac style feud over the fact that you called my Station to Station choice lazy. I can see you're not gonna be much help."

If you back to the top of the thread you'll see I actually started off by describing this choice as "OTM", so you see when I subsequently recanted that choice as being lazy I was already driving by and shooting myself....

"Metal Urbain would be my pick."

You see? It's all about France. Told ya so.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)

""Faust Tapes" was released in 1973 for 49p and it sold like hotcakes, even if most people played it once and made a frisbee of it."

I don't know if you're consciously or subconsciously paraphrasing this, but I remember reading an interview with Jim Kerr, many years ago, in which he was asked to what extent he had been aware of Krautrock and how much of an influence it had been on Simple Minds in their early days.

His response was that the full extent of that knowledge and influence consisted of his having once purchased a copy of The Faust Tapes, solely because it was cheap, having played it once, hated it, and then used it as a frisbee.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

sensational alex harvey

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

I can see how Slade's football chants and stomps and claps influenced oi! and also Queen. At least on "We Will Rock You" and "We Are The Champions"; yes, even or especially the trilling latter, coz one of the big Slade football hits was "You'll Never Walk Alone," from The Sound Of Music. Bangs saw 'em lead the soccer stadium audience in a swaying sing-along,reported getting chills. And I guess some punks used some Slade-to-oi! effects, sure.(Not that Slade themselves didn't pick up on what they heard in stadiums, at matches.)(Siouxie kinda aside.) But seems like Noddy's vocal piercings went more to metal. (Not that he didn't do it better, prime Axl aside--maybe.)Speaking of Metal Urbain and Metal Boys, leave us not forget their progeny, Dr. Mix And The Remix, a varee ztrange cover band.

don, Saturday, 11 February 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

Fleetwood Mac's "The Green Manalishi"

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Saturday, 11 February 2006 04:02 (nineteen years ago)

"I can see how Slade's football chants and stomps and claps influenced oi!"

Tell me you're not going to nominate something by Sham 69, please....

".... one of the big Slade football hits was "You'll Never Walk Alone," from The Sound Of Music."

I believe Slade covered "You'll Never Walk Alone" on one live album that they released during the wilderness years between their early-mid '70's Glam Rock peak and their mid-'80's reinvention as a heavy rock band; but afaik they never released it as a single and they certainly never had a (UK?) hit with it.

Also it wasn't actually from The Sound Of Music, it was from Carousel which was written by the same people, Rodgers and Hammerstein - yes, the very same people who wrote that other giant Post Punk smash "Happy Talk" - and subsequently covered by Gerry & The Pacemakers and just about everyone who's ever been to a football (soccer) match; particularly Liverpool FC.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Saturday, 11 February 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)

The Misfits Static Age ain't a bad one. It has that "glammy" Doors vibe but the songs are quite angular, too.

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Saturday, 11 February 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

Heldon - Electronique Guerrilla 74
Pere Ubu - Datapink In The Year Zero EP 75-76
Chrome - The Visitation 77

Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Monday, 13 February 2006 11:43 (nineteen years ago)

but I remember reading an interview with Jim Kerr, many years ago, in which he was asked to what extent he had been

This was cited in something Julian Cope wrote. Apparently, they'd met one time, got on really well, until the subject came up about the Faust tapes album. Jim tells Julian about lobbing it off some skyscraper as a frisbee, and Julian then says about "right there, I realised we could never be friends."

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 13 February 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.