Wake Up ILM, there's a new Fiery Furnaces LP

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And its great.

snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:23 (twenty years ago)

ysi

ouh, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:28 (twenty years ago)

no, don't YSI, tell us what it's called and why you think it is great

zebedee (zebedee), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:30 (twenty years ago)

yes ysi, it's called bitter tea and he thinks it's great because the particular noises please his ears.

jernas, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:31 (twenty years ago)

it seems, from the furnaces brothers description, it is supposed to be the opposite to their latest "reharsing".(catchy songs,less epic, maybe like the 1st record was)
mmm...opposite of "one of the worst record ive heard recently"...
i got it:"one of the best".
so i guess it is great.

french trolly, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:37 (twenty years ago)

Its called "Bitter Sea", and I think its great because it's closer to the EP than to "Rehearsing my Choir", its a pop record.

snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:38 (twenty years ago)

http://s41.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3D8OTGDPCVCSF135B8Y2Y9OZXR

I will only post this one track. And I dont think it would be a good idea to YSI the whole album, this isnt a torrent site.


snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:44 (twenty years ago)

Snowballing, do I have to beg you to put up the studio version of "Police Sweater Blood Vow"?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:49 (twenty years ago)

Oh fucking joy.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:52 (twenty years ago)

You dont have to beg me Matthew, you just need to check your mail.

snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:53 (twenty years ago)

Maybe I should have also mentioned theres a Billie Jean "sample" in one of the track.

snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:55 (twenty years ago)

thanx for the track.
it sounds nice.
kinda "blueberry boat" style track.

french trolly, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 13:59 (twenty years ago)

The final version "Teach Me Sweetheart" is really interesting - it's much less happy and boppy than the live acoustic version, which seemed more like an accessable "hit." Which is not to say that this is a butchered version, just longer and weirder and more melancholy.

But you know, if I've learned anything from being a fan of this band, there really is no such thing as a "final version" to them.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:01 (twenty years ago)

"Police Sweater Blood Vow"

Such a Robert Pollard title.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:03 (twenty years ago)

OH MY GOD. They didn't fuck up "Police Sweater Blood Vow"! It's amazing. It's totally their "hit."

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 14:04 (twenty years ago)

"teach me sweetheart" -- well, i've said it before about these guys and i'll say it again, it reminds me of robert wyatt!

i always wondered where my mandibula was! (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:20 (twenty years ago)

You know, I bought the "ep" album, very cheap, and contains their best.

Do I need another CD?

Moral: Never undersell yourself.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 15:37 (twenty years ago)

I've been listening to the new album for the past few hours now, and I love it. The first three songs seem like a more concise, poppier version of what they were doing musically on Rehearsing My Choir, but then "Bitter Tea" starts up and it feels like the proper beginning of the album after a brief prologue. The liberal usage of backmasked vocals is really interesting and generally effective/appealing. It mostly sounds like what it feel to hear words that you either are not fully paying attention to, or in a language that you can't understand. It's a little like how adults speak in the animated version of Peanuts.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 17:54 (twenty years ago)

I really like what they did with Teach Me Sweetheart, it's super pretty.

The sequencing seems similar in form to that of the new Belle & Sebastian album.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:01 (twenty years ago)

is there anyone in this world who really think "reharsing my choir" is a good album?
i mean except from the furnaces themselvs (though it might be that they dont think so as well)

road runner goes to to beach, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:03 (twenty years ago)

annoying keyboard textures? check
predictable chord progressions? check
'clever' lyrics? check
simple melodies? check

yep, its a return to 'form'

hjkjkh, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:04 (twenty years ago)

xpost

Matthew C Perpetua in loving Fiery Furnaces shockah!

I'm not supercharmed by either of these songs, on first listen. But will defer judgment, obv. Album is veeeery slowly downloading. I find it surprising that I would favour progweirdo Furnaces over popweirdo Furnaces, but whatev.


non xpost

It's my fave FF LP.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:05 (twenty years ago)

Ditto for quite a few others I know.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Sean, am I right in remembering that you don't really like Stephen Malkmus that much either? A lot of the appeal in the Furnaces for me is that they have a lot in common with him. Pavement is my favorite rock band of all time, and so it follows logically for me that the Furnaces would be my second favorite. It's just the kind of thing I'm into.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:09 (twenty years ago)

And I really like Rehearsing My Choir! It's definitely not their best record, but it's certainly a good one.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:10 (twenty years ago)

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazzandjop05/index.php?page=ballots&mid=795

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:11 (twenty years ago)

xposts

Yeah, Malkmus is not very interesting to me. Even the Pavement i love isn't the norm (Brighten the Corners, "Carrot Rope", "Secret Life of Back Roads"). I have a complicated theory linking it to my ambivalence toward electric guitar antics, but it's probably more related to my weird relationship with song lyrics.

Dan, however (of StG), is a massive Pavement/Malkmus fan, and also big-big-big into the Furnaces. So yeah, there does seem to be a "kind of thing" going on. (Interestingly, Dan's other pet bands are things you don't seem to have much time for [Modest Mouse, Wolf Parade, Arcade Fire]; but despite how that might look, he's not at all the conventional indie-rock listener.)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:13 (twenty years ago)

I think the major things connecting Malkmus and the Furnaces are basically a very whimsical approach to melody/keyboard and guitar sounds/arrangement/song structure, a similar lyrical style, and a similar mixture of emotions. They are big on specific details and odd subject matter. The humor is along the same lines, and they both have a sort of deadpan vocal style.

I think Modest Mouse, Wolf Parade, and Arcade Fire are more of a macho, angst-ridden version of this sort of thing, maybe.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:19 (twenty years ago)

Which is no knock on those three bands, all of whom have written some fine songs, but don't really command as much interest from me. Though there are maybe 15 Modest Mouse songs that I really love.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:22 (twenty years ago)

I dunno where I'd "rank" it.

But after the first couple of listens, it's listenable at the very least... so much better than Rehearsing

Quinn (quinn), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:29 (twenty years ago)

I'm pretty certain there's another, like, musical link between Malkmus and the Friedbergers, but I lack the chops to identify it. Something to do with the kind of chords, palette of notes, etc. And that's certainly more important to my feelings about the band than "whimsical melody".

I don't think Wolf Parade or Arcade Fire are like most Pavement or Furnaces stuff at ALL. I just brought it up to articulate that your personal taste isn't necessarily going to be sensible - it's not as easy as breaking it down into pieces and saying "oh you don't like whimsical keyboards and [a given] sense of humour, and that's why our tastes are different".

sean gramophone (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:31 (twenty years ago)

When I like The Arcade Fire, it's almost entirely because of the fact that they sound like a primitive, awkward version of U2.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)

" think the major things connecting Malkmus and the Furnaces are basically a very whimsical approach to melody/keyboard and guitar sounds/arrangement/song structure, a similar lyrical style, and a similar mixture of emotions. "

see, i dont hear this. pavement packs, for me, a MUCH larger (that is to say, existent) emotional punch than FF. pavement melodies to me are wistful, unpredictable, and above all, memorable, where FF songs just seem to clunk along in time-worn chord/melody combinations. whimsy, while certainly not absent to my ears in pavement songs, definitely just complements rather than dominates the proceedings IMHO. anyways, i just HATE the FF so i am going to get off of this thread now; it is not my goal to pour hatorade on the
proceedings here ...

xpost

matt likes to do that 'ironic shredding' thing that SS was doing ten years ago

jklvxc, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 18:39 (twenty years ago)

is there anyone in this world who really think "reharsing my choir" is a good album?

yep, i like it lots and i think it's stood up well to repeated listening -- if anything, the repeated listening made me appreciate it more.

as far as i can tell, the people who "hate" this album are myopic pitchfork types who only like it when their bands sound like INDIE RAWK.

i always wondered where my mandibula was! (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:27 (twenty years ago)

I think the thing with Rehearsing My Choir is also that it is both a record that works better after repeated listenings AND is not a record that you might want to hear all the time, so it requires a bit of patience some people might not have. I can understand that.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

"Rehearsing" is my favorite record by them so far. Though I also haven't been too big on their recordings in general -- I think they're the bomb live, and I like their other records mostly in relation to having seen them play the songs. I think they're getting better at recording and getting the aesthetic they're aiming for each time, and I'm looking forward to what comes next (including those Matt F. solo things P'fork has been teasing).

morris pavilion (samjeff), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:54 (twenty years ago)

I dunno, there was always a warmth to Pavement that I can't find in The Fiery Furnaces. I might see a FF-Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain link but not beyond that.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:05 (twenty years ago)

I think the connection is less to CRCR and more to Wowee Zowee, man.

I find the Furnaces to be an exceptionally warm band, even if there persona can be a little cold. But you know, Malkmus is exactly the same way.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:07 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps, but the FF has so much stuff burying whatever warmth there might be (and maybe that makes finding it that much more rewarding, I dunno), but Pavement -- despite Malkmus' distant persona -- is immediately inviting in its lazy guitars and the "slipping of the mask" in his vocal delivery. He seems to be putting miles between him and the listeners with some of his vocal affectations and lyrics, but at the same time he finds the right lyrics to hit that emotion and his coldness dissipates.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:17 (twenty years ago)

Dude, Eleanor!

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:18 (twenty years ago)

I honestly can't understand why people reacted with such revulsion to Rehearsing My Choir the album. I can understand why they would be very put off by their live performances when they were touring that album, I even walked out of one.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:20 (twenty years ago)

see, i don't care about warmth. i'm into eurodisco!

i always wondered where my mandibula was! (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:20 (twenty years ago)

multiple xposts there

i always wondered where my mandibula was! (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:21 (twenty years ago)

Pavement's one of my favorite bands ("Wowee Zowee" specifically), but I don't really hear a connection.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:40 (twenty years ago)

Summer's gone, days spent with the grass and sun
I don't mind, to pretend I do seems really dumb
I rise as the morning comes
Crawling through the blinds
I shouldn't be up at this time,wake up, it's so beautiful
For what could be the very last time

There's a new Fiery Furnaces LP
So wake up ILM!
There's so many things for us to do
But I can't sleep with you there by my side

Wake up, it's a beautiful morning
And also there's a new Fiery Furnaces LP
Wake up, it's so beautiful
For what could be the very last time

It's early so take your time,
Don't let me rush you please
I know I was up all night, I can do anything,
Anything, anything

But you can't blame me
Not for the death of summer
No you can't blame me
Not for the death of summer
But you're gonna say what you wanna say
You have to put the death in everything

YSI?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:42 (twenty years ago)

Are the track titles wrong toward the end?

There's an untitled 15th track, too, but it sounds like it might be Benton Harbor Blues Again, but there's a different song labeled as that.

duae, Wednesday, 22 February 2006 22:28 (twenty years ago)

"Teach Me..." sounds great! How can I get the rest of it?

billy burch (pomalift), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 22:36 (twenty years ago)

is this much weirder than it was touted as being or have i got some leaked fakeout version? it's all keyboards, plus the sort of tack-piano sound from 'rehearsing..' (which was grebt, fuck you haters), plus both the first two tracks have matt's vocals backwards..?

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:35 (twenty years ago)

'nevers' is pretty wonderful.

tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:40 (twenty years ago)

Most of the songs on the album have backmasked bits, it's definitely the real thing. He's talked about the album being this way.

I kinda see why they wanted this to be part of a two-disc set with Rehearsing My Choir - they certainly work as companion pieces, and you can see a lot of crossover in the musical ideas between the two albums.

There's clearly a problem with the tracklisting - 15 is obviously "Benton Harbor Blues," and 14 seems to be a reprise of "Nevers." I really fell in love with "Benton Harbor Blues Again" on the commute home today. What a beautiful song!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 00:37 (twenty years ago)

my eyes caught matt's thing on the way down:

"When I like The Arcade Fire, it's almost entirely because of the fact that they sound like a primitive, awkward version of U2."

so basically because they don't sound like U2?

i thought "rehearsing" was an absolutely incredible record. at the end of the day i prefer it over blueberry. and i'm really loving this bitter tea stuff, hooray for the friedbergers going with fat possum as well.

anvsbl, Thursday, 23 February 2006 01:04 (twenty years ago)

i swear i heard a melody from RMC on one of those tracks.

it seems like their most uneven record, not in terms of quality, terms of flow, different sounds jarring with each other, not the thematic unity of the last two.

so when's the next one out huh

tom west (thomp), Thursday, 23 February 2006 01:21 (twenty years ago)

I agree that the running order lacks flow except for this little stretch in the middle.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 23 February 2006 01:24 (twenty years ago)

as with all their full length releases it really tires me out towards the end. i love the 1st x tracks but then it all starts to wear thin. still and all, and once again, there's some terrific tracks.

phil turnbull (philT), Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:00 (twenty years ago)

Rehearsing My Choir was one of the few critically lauded albums of last year that I thought was entirely and unredeemably awful.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:03 (twenty years ago)

why does every thread about a band have to turn into a c/d? i wanna talk about the new record; go party-poop somewhere else.

the bitchy guy in the pince-nez from the old films (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 23 February 2006 03:13 (twenty years ago)

Daniel that made me smile, makes me want to put on the Boos. Just finished d/l but will wait till tomorrow to hear.

BeeOK (boo radley), Thursday, 23 February 2006 09:45 (twenty years ago)

someone just released an edited version of this album with all backwards vocals reversed. i don't think it was eppy.

pinder (pinder), Friday, 24 February 2006 07:34 (twenty years ago)

This album is pretty good but have only heard it once. I love Blueberry Boat and the E.P. but haven't got around to the debut or Rehearsing My Choir as of yet.

BeeOK (boo radley), Friday, 24 February 2006 08:51 (twenty years ago)

See, the thing is about the FF releasing their "pop" record is that they can't help but fuck with any pop song they do write. And so all the awesome pop songs here are abortive. "Teach Me Sweetheart" is this great (and, yeah, conventional) "Maps"-like pop song, really really magic, until inevitably they forego a real climax to do a turn of carnivalesque donky-donk and a repeat of stuff from the beginning.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 24 February 2006 09:11 (twenty years ago)

I have to say, much as I often like/love what they do, I do sometimes wish they'd release an album with just ten songs with only acoustic guitar and piano accompaniment or something.

It's good that they're different, unique blah blah but it wouldn't hurt to keep it simple sometimes. Especially where it seems fitting - as in the extra bits (and they feel like distracting extra bits) don't seem to especially serve the purpose of the song. I definitely feel there's sometimes a real unwillingness to let it be/let the song breathe a bit. I had this trouble with some of the songs near the end of Blueberry Boat.

By which I mean, HEY MATT FRIEDBERGER: CHILL THE FUCK OUT

Because otherwise he'll end up as bad as Jools Holland, but instead of a case of the OCD boogie woogies he'll have squelchy keyboard skronk instead.

I like a lot of this new one, I just don't want to listen to it all. TRIM THE FAT, MATT FRIEDBERGER! You don't need to try and use the whole capacity of a cd every time.

Suedey (John Cei Douglas), Friday, 24 February 2006 10:13 (twenty years ago)

Those are very much my impressions from initial listening over the past couple of days. I have been quite distracted, mind. I find myself mainly coming back to I'm in No Mood, Bitter Tea, Police Sweater Blood Vow and I'm Waiting To Know You.

Suedey (John Cei Douglas), Friday, 24 February 2006 10:18 (twenty years ago)

"Nevers"!!

sean gramophone (Sean M), Friday, 24 February 2006 10:35 (twenty years ago)

someone just released an edited version of this album with all backwards vocals reversed. i don't think it was eppy.

Bwahaha. No, I'm working on my "make them actual pop songs" version this weekend.

Eppy (Eppy), Friday, 24 February 2006 17:08 (twenty years ago)

this might be my favorite album of theirs (emphasis on "might be" -- i've only listened a couple of times). it's very quiet and remote-sounding, not excessively showmanlike.

the bitchy guy in the pince-nez from the old films (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 24 February 2006 17:34 (twenty years ago)

"the vietnamese telephone ministry" is my fav track on here so far.

the bitchy guy in the pince-nez from the old films (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 24 February 2006 17:35 (twenty years ago)

Hm, I thought that was easily the worst track.

Patrick South (Patrick South), Friday, 24 February 2006 18:12 (twenty years ago)

it's their can/kid a moment.

the bitchy guy in the pince-nez from the old films (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 24 February 2006 18:21 (twenty years ago)

booooorrrrringg

whatever (boglogger), Friday, 24 February 2006 18:41 (twenty years ago)

what i just wrote to some friends elsewhere:

two faves on new rec so far: "the vietnamese telephone ministry" and "oh sweet woods" -- they're sorta the logical progression from the art of noise- style instrumental introverted-industrial-groove bits that open "quay cur" and "blueberry boat"! i want more stuff like this from them.

the bitchy guy in the pince-nez from the old films (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 24 February 2006 18:42 (twenty years ago)

Ha, I was just going to write something to this thread about how much I like "Vietnames" and "Oh Sweet Woods," but good ol' Jody beat me to it!

I'm way into "Bitter Tea" and "Benton Harbor Blues Again" as well. I kinda wish that I had heard the album version of "Waiting To Know You" first, because I would have liked to have always had that sparkly sound be part of my first impression.

I'm finding this record to be an interesting challenge. The music itself is fairly accessable, but getting my head around it as an album has been tricky and confusing. It feels more like a set of eps/singles - 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-13, 14-15

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 25 February 2006 03:22 (twenty years ago)

as with all their full length releases it really tires me out towards the end. i love the 1st x tracks but then it all starts to wear thin. still and all, and once again, there's some terrific tracks.

I get this way about Blueberry Boat and Rehearsing My Choir, but I find that Bitter Tea's best stuff is mostly on the second half of the record. I've been generally playing the album starting with "Bitter Tea" and progressing through from there. I kinda wish they had just kept the second versions of "Nevers" and "Benton Harbor" and saved the alternates for b-sides/reissues.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 25 February 2006 03:28 (twenty years ago)

cover art:who is she?!!?
http://rateyourmusic.com/album_images/o222126.jpg

dog food, Saturday, 25 February 2006 05:00 (twenty years ago)

the fiery furnaces ran out of ideas.
in terms of melodies - they did it before,
in terms of production - they did it before,though yes, they are trying as hard as they can to be "original" and "new", and it shows - (and thats bad...)
,but the result,it seems,is not so original and new after all, just pretentious.
i hope they are not too in love with themselvs and their ideas in order to invent themselvs again,maybe in the next album.
and yes, the 2nd half is better, cause it is more "rock" and "simple":
hey - furnaces - it is not such bad thing.
to make things short - a good change will be helpfull to them,not getting stuck in those childish ideas.
but than again,"animal collective" are popular as well, so what the hell do i know.

my name is not, Sunday, 26 February 2006 22:36 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, be normal and easy like everyone else!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 26 February 2006 22:47 (twenty years ago)

who?
the furnaces or myself?!

my name is not, Sunday, 26 February 2006 22:51 (twenty years ago)

I mean, how are we meant to interpret comments like that? "You've run out of ideas" = we want you to keep doing different things (which I'd argue that they certainly have done with these last two records, but let's not quibble with the pea-brained...), but "don't be pretentious/be simple/rock" = don't change, be exactly like everyone else. Pick one side and go with it, man.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 26 February 2006 22:52 (twenty years ago)

But I really don't see the point in asking them to straighten up and play like a normal rock band when there's literally thousands of other acts who do just that. Is it that awful to have some people like this who are restless and want to do strange things with their songs, even if it's not always the best thing they could do? They are constantly reinterpreting their own work, they treat the songs as living things, which is something more people should try.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 26 February 2006 22:57 (twenty years ago)

interpretation
"youve ran out of ideas" = ran out of good ideas.
so if you dont have any good ideas - do it "simple" and "rock".

p.s. the size is not importend (pea).but you probably know that..

my name is not, Sunday, 26 February 2006 23:00 (twenty years ago)

there are many experimental stuff that is "restless" and "doing strange things"
some of them are bad,some are good,but they dont all essentially good!
i think the furnaces goes more towards the bad/not intersting.
but that is just my opinion.

my noame is not, Sunday, 26 February 2006 23:05 (twenty years ago)

there are a couple of songs on here that sound like uninspired retreads to me ("borneo," "nevers") -- but the FFs usually have a couple of iffy tracks per album. i agree that they don't have to release EVERYTHING they think up, but for me the transparency of having it all out there is interesting.

i've only played bitter tea a couple of times, but i can already point to five or six songs that i think sound fresh and rank with their best stuff. and many of the lateral moves are pretty okay too.

Autonomous University of Zacatecas (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 27 February 2006 00:04 (twenty years ago)

I kinda agree that "Borneo" sounds like them immitating themselves. I like that one, but it kinda loses me as it trails off. It does a good job of bridging the album from "Oh Sweet Woods" to "Police Sweater Blood Vow," though.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 27 February 2006 01:12 (twenty years ago)

Now I know why I like this that much : it's their most François de Roubaix record.

snowballing (snowballing), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 13:33 (twenty years ago)

i think this is my fave furnaces album too. finally focusing on eleanor's vocals without sacrificing any of the zonked-out synth shit.

but:

Maybe I should have also mentioned theres a Billie Jean "sample" in one of the track.

-- snowballing (snowballin...), February 22nd, 2006.

what was this referring to? i haven't noticed it...

sun yat-sen, Wednesday, 15 March 2006 01:50 (nineteen years ago)

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz

The Day The World Turned Dayglo Redd (Ken L), Wednesday, 15 March 2006 01:52 (nineteen years ago)

So, did the record succeed in the test of time?
or did it get worse? (no way better...)

cC, Sunday, 26 March 2006 01:20 (nineteen years ago)

When does this come out again? I'll probably listen to it then.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 27 March 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

i love how in 2006 we can debate whether a record has stood the test of time before it's even been released

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 27 March 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

I still hear this thread title in the voice of a scolding gay man.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 27 March 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

Why do I like and hate this at the same time?

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000EQ5Q86.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_V57015745_.jpg

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

that's awesome

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

i dig the new album. bit long though. and, for the record, i was fine with the length of blueberry boat.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 27 March 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

"I think Modest Mouse, Wolf Parade, and Arcade Fire are more of a macho, angst-ridden version of this sort of thing, maybe."

macho??????
wow...i don't know if any of these bands could EVER be labeled 'macho'...by anyone...

fer the record- the pavement/sm/FF similarities begin and end with the lyrics only. not in the songs. not at all...pavement-more squalls of noize mixed w/ some rambunctious song writing. SM= a WAY more low key approach, since his noize side-kick, SS, isn't there to tell him when to make it louder anymore. FF=quirky time signature and medleys and almost a lack of any followable 'song structure'. "BBB" was 'alright' a few good songs with some fodderificness thrown in for good measure.
all this praise, i'm afriad, has done nothing to help them. 'rehearse' seems to just go and go and go and go nowhere.
now, please, BBC, tell me how wrong i am...

eedd, Tuesday, 28 March 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

the cover art reminds me of the sort of design you'd see on late '60s/early '70s left-wing magazines or off-off-broadway theater posters. or children's books illustrated by people who designed such things.

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

(and there's also a futurist/dadaist element to it, but that's kind of implied.)

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

Someone needs to explain to me why people keep insisting there are complex time signatures in Fiery Furnaces songs. There aren't.

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

(they just change tempos, which is different.)

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, they don't seem to do the time-signature thing. More like the abrupt tempo-shift thing. I mean can someone think of a song of theirs that's not in 4/4?

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

I mean they hardly approach the rhythmic complexity of, for instance, Opeth.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, they don't seem to do the time-signature thing. More like the abrupt tempo-shift thing. I mean can someone think of a song of theirs that's not in 4/4?

they have some in waltz time. ("cousin chris" comes to mind.)

send your men of science quick (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:42 (nineteen years ago)

OK, maybe a couple of waltz time sections, fair point. But none of your 15/4, 5/4, 12/8 etc. stuff, at least that I can recall.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, 3/4 is about as far from a "quirky" time signature as you can get.

Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

Ha, I love how SM's "noise rock sidekick" is the guy making alt-country records now.

It's not just the lyrics, Ed. It's the singing and a lot of the guitar and keyboard style too.

I think the thing with time signatures is that a lot of people don't really understand what they are, and so anything that doesn't seem rhythmically/structurally normal is assumed to be a time signature thing. I don't fully understand it myself, to be honest, so I try to avoid mentioning it at all.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

That is my favorite Furnaces album cover by far, by the way. But you know, album covers isn't really their strong suit.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

Time signatures is quite simply a matter of counting the beats per measure. Quirky time signatures usually refers to something with an odd number of beats per measure (other than 3, which is fairly common). So something like 5, 7, 9, etc. These are unusual time signatures because they tend to have a somewhat disjointed feel to them - like a rotating wheel that's slightly off-center - and since they are unusual they often also force musicians out of typical melody phrasings as well.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)

But you know, album covers isn't really their strong suit.

you think? i wasn't too impressed by the gallowsbird's cover, but blueberry boat and EP were very pretty, again in a mid-century graphic-design mag sorta way.

chillaxing damsel on box art (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

the only diff b/t SM and MF as songwriters is that SM is exponentially BETTER

fjsdkl, Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

Not lately, he's not.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

The Furnaces albums covers have been nice, but not really anything I could get enthusiastic about.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

i meant pavement era SM, not this jicks shit

zcfhjzk, Tuesday, 28 March 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)

Am I alone in thinking that this record isn't anywhere near as compelling as "Blueberry Boat"?

Simon H. (Simon H.), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)

i think it's plenty compelling, but it falls apart at the end. there's no need for those reprises (although "benton harbor blues" is good, subdued lite-rock). "nevers" just isn't interesting enough to warrant a second go-round (or a first, really).

chillaxing damsel on box art (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

I think the album has faulty sequencing, and it's the only thing keeping it from being as good as Blueberry Boat. (Very few things in life as good as Gallowsbird's Bark, so I don't even bother comparing anything to that one.) I'd be happier with the album if the first three tracks were removed, as well as the reversed version of "Nevers" and the long version of "Benton Harbor Blues."

Like so:

Bitter Tea
Teach Me Sweetheart
Waiting To Know You
The Vietnamese Telephone Directory
Oh Sweet Woods
Borneo
Police Sweater Blood Vow
Nevers
Whistle Rhapsody
Benton Harbor Blues

That whole run from "Bitter Tea" through "Police Sweater Blood Vow" is pretty astonishing, and easily some of their best work.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 28 March 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm, I'm having a hard time with this one, and I'm not sure it's just down to my expectations, as Matt F might have it.

It's only been two listens, so I'm not going to give up yet - Blueberry Boat bamboozled me at first and by the fourth listen I was hooked. But this is the first of their albums that has left me feeling *completely* cold from start to end. It sounds like they listened to their previous work and said: "Let's do more like this but without the energy or the tunes."

Did anyone here start off feeling disappointed and end up loving it?

Peter Cushing (Saveloy), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry, Peter. I'm more or less in the same boat you're in.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

There's some songs on it that I didn't really like at first that I ended up loving.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)

I think it's the best one so far.

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

I like it plenty but the idea that it's "pop" is pretty hilarious.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, the pop thing is way off, but that's really just about it being more "pop" in relationship to Rehearsing My Choir, and maybe some songs off of Blueberry Boat.

"Police Sweater Blood Vow" and "Benton Harbor Blues (Again)" are pretty pop by Furnaces standards, though.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 12 April 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)

Hold the front page! Third listen last night on the bus on the way home - on headphones, natch - and it's *just* starting to tickle my fancy. The tunes have started to reveal themselves.

I've figured it out - a normal tune will be repeated umpteen times in the course of a song, so it takes one or two goes for it to sink in. Yer Fiery Furnaces tune only gets a couple of repeats before it's whipped from under yer feet and replaced by something else. So it takes far more listens to take. Obvious but true; in my brane anyway.

I'm still a bit disappointed that this isn't the mad pop gem I wanted it to be - is there a single moment of "Uh! Yessss!" release on the entire album? - but I'm starting to appreciate its more subtle pleasures. Standout fave at the moment is "Teach Me Sweatheart". I want "Police Sweater..." to be fantastic but the deliberate and frustrating lack of climax makes me go "Feh.." towards the end.

Peter Cushing (Saveloy), Thursday, 13 April 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

Peter, I think you might like the new live version of "Police Sweater" - it's part Led Zep, part Motown. Way more release. If they wanted a hit, they would've recorded it that way.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 14 April 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

But still, I totally think the "vibrate buzz buzz ring and beep!" thing qualifies as an "Uh! Yesss!" moment.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 14 April 2006 02:04 (nineteen years ago)

See also:

"You've got the wrong Eleanor Friedberger!" in "Oh Sweet Woods"

And:

That pizzicato-like keyboard part in "Bitter Tea," and when Eleanor sings "Aren't you curious?" and "I think you're curious..." and the big stompy instrumental sections in that song before Matt starts singing. I can't fathom why more people aren't completely obsessed with this song, honestly.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 14 April 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)

I can't fathom why more people aren't completely obsessed with this song, honestly.

it's my favorite song on the record, actually.

rajeev (rajeev), Friday, 14 April 2006 02:24 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not a huge fan of the band, but I really like this record. Possibly because so much of it reminds me of Eno's first album, especially the nods to girl-group stuff and doo wop and bursts of pretty weirdness that shouldn't make sense but somehow do.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 17 April 2006 13:13 (nineteen years ago)

Ben Ratliff has mostly nice things to say in the Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/17/arts/music/17choi.html

o. nate (onate), Monday, 17 April 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

Really looking forward to hearing this.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 17 April 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

I must admit that the "Nevers" reprise/version is totally starting to take over my life.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)

i like the title track a LOT. i want to see them steal more from devo and wall of voodoo.

the enduring pueblo (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 17 April 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

Best band that we have today, IMO.

LOve, lovE, love thier new stuff and will buy it this week.

BeeOK (boo radley), Wednesday, 19 April 2006 07:47 (nineteen years ago)

OK, I finally got this last night. After one listen: This is definitely not their "pop" move - in fact, this is probably their least "pop" album yet, except for Rehearsing My Choir. Their most "pop" was probably their debut, followed by the EP, followed by Blueberry, followed by this one. At least if you define "pop" in terms of accessibility and songs that go directly from point A to point B without frequent detours to points Q, X and Z. The hyperactive need to fuck with every little element of the song reminds me most of Aphex Twin of all people. The way that they use backwards vocals as pure sound elements and the piercing synth tones and even the skittery beats in places all remind me of stuff from The Richard D. James Album or I Care Because You Do. But then there's Eleanor's singing which humanizes it and keeps in grounded in the rock tradition and the rinky-dink piano which hearkens back to Elton John via Quasi and Mates of State. Not sure how much I like it yet, but it's at least "interesting".

o. nate (onate), Friday, 21 April 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

the cover art reminds me of the sort of design you'd see on late '60s/early '70s left-wing magazines or off-off-broadway theater posters.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000EQ5Q86.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_V57015745_.jpg http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9gnMiYV_UhELBcBKDKjzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NDgyNWN0BHNlYwNwcm9m/SIG=124j5tkl3/EXP=1145720469/**http%3a//www.imageexchange.com/shop/media/4033.jpg

poortheatre (poortheatre), Friday, 21 April 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

and i'm looking forward to picking this up at their show in mid-may.. maybe on vinylllll mmm...

poortheatre (poortheatre), Friday, 21 April 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

poortheatre, that's exactly what i was getting at. :-)

stockholm cindy: comedy vigilante (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 21 April 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.east-asia-architecture.org/ieaau2/assets2-publication/metabolistic-concept.gif

Graphic design from the early 1960s by K. Awazu presenting the Metabolist concept of change in housing. High-rise mega-structures support myriad apartment capsules which are modified and replaced according to their own life cycles and the social cycles of demand and fashion.

stockholm cindy: comedy vigilante (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 21 April 2006 15:22 (nineteen years ago)

this one too, especially

stockholm cindy: comedy vigilante (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 21 April 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

o.nate nails it ! aphex twin meets elton john with female vocals. now how could that possibly be bad ?

Brad Laner (Brad Laner), Friday, 21 April 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

Poortheatre, the band is currently only selling cds at their shows.

Actually, I'm fairly certain that none of their albums have been released on vinyl.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 21 April 2006 17:00 (nineteen years ago)

Gallowbirds Bark and Rehearsing My Choir are both available on vinyl.

wireless, Friday, 21 April 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

is there a single moment of "Uh! Yessss!" release on the entire album?

Hearing "Benton Harbor Blues" for the first time, the keyboard groove starts up, and I think, "Oh! I really hope this'll be a simple pop song built on that groove, sounds great!" -- but then it drops out, replaced by squelching and whatnot, and my heart sinks a little -- "nuts, it was just a little section, whatta tease" -- but then it starts up again, and it IS a simple pop song built on that groove, and it's GREAT!!

(I like that version, the first one, better than the straightforward reprise, because the way it's messed around sort of complicates the pleasure of the basic groove/melody, making it more satisfying, somehow, than when it's just played through without tension or complication.)

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 28 April 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

what a dick:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/23/fashion/sundaystyles/23NITE.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

not impressed, Friday, 28 April 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

It reminds me of how I like the "dub" version of the Homosexuals' "Hearts in Exile" (as it was originally released?) better than the un-messed-around-with version. It's the same with many remixes that "improve" the original, I guess, though I can't think of any other examples right now. (I think the original song has to be simple enough that it's almost a little too boring without complication, and the messing-with-it makes the simple groove/tune/whatever more pleasurable by clouding it, or allowing it to be itself only intermittently.)

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:02 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not feeling it. I've tried to get into it multiple times since it leaked, and I don't really care about any of it besides "Waiting to know you," which is a pretty fantastic pop song. It feels like a middling, auto-pilot album, which are always the worst. Not to mention how uninteresting the whole backwards-music schtick is. Grandma album>>>this.

jason. (jason.), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

I just got it, and have only listened once through, but I think that starting with "Teach Me Sweetheart," it's very very good! (I could maybe do without "Nevers.")

(The grandma album's hard to beat -- it has a particular appeal that most albums don't, and I think I'll be listening to it straight through, once a month or so, for a loooong time... but I'm really happy about the new one so far. They're such a unique band, at least compared to anyone else I'm familiar with... even though some songs "miss" for me, the grand total of what they're doing just impresses and pleases me so much. And I'm REALLY happy they're coming back here on tour so soon, because their live thang is the best!)

morris pavilion (samjeff), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)

So far, each time I've listened to this (I waited until it came out to get it), it's opened up a little bit more, so that's a good sign. The first time I listened to it, the main impression I got was one of willful prickliness, with a few catchy melodies thrown in. But now the structures of the songs are starting to display some internal logic - a method to the madness, if you will.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

I definitely see it as a companion piece to the Grandma album. The textures and structuring principles are cut from the same cloth, with the exception of the Grandmother's voice, of course.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

i still think this record is very good, although it's patchy in places. "black-hearted boy" is really eerie, pretty, and tense, and the clunky tack-piano/harpsichord sound works in its favor, as do the vibes and the bass squelches on the synth. they're at their best when their music is part of the storytelling and not just accompaniment or moving the song forward.

i see the backwards-vocals stuff as more part of the texture/fabric than just trying to be wacky and psychedelic.

flea market economy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 April 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

i also love love LOVE the transition between "black-hearted boy" and the intro to "bitter tea."

flea market economy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

I wonder, would I be more into this record if they’d waited til 2007 to release it? The reviews I’ve read make it seem more interesting than it was the 10 or so times I’ve forced myself to listen to the whole thing. It’ll probably make more sense to me in six months or so when I feel up to taking it back out again.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 28 April 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

I'm starting to think that Bitter Tea is going to be one of those records that lots of people start saying is their favorite Fiery Furnaces album about ten years after it is released.

It will never be my favorite (it's sort of impossible to imagine them beating Gallowsbird's Bark, especially in terms of my sentimentality), but I think it's really great. I was listening to a big chunk of it on the train home yesterday, and it was really working for me. "Borneo" suddenly made a lot more sense somehow. (Not because I was on a train, mind you.)

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

music is part of the storytelling and not just accompaniment or moving the song forward.

This is basically what clicked with me for "Borneo" yesterday. I think reading the lyrics helped a bit for that song too.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 28 April 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

it occurred to me a few listens in that the very, uh, extroverted synth phrases in "borneo" reminded me of the "hit the jackpot" music you hear on game shows and in casinos. and the song's about compulsive gambling, so it makes sense!

flea market economy (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, that's exactly it! It reminds me a bit of the music on gambling video games, things like that.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Friday, 28 April 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

"the clunky tack-piano/harpsichord sound works in its favor"

You really think so? I have to say I completely disagree. THERE IS NEVER A GOOD REASON TO USE A HARPSICHORD-LIKE SOUND. EVER. This is what annoys me most about the last two Furnaces records. Bitter Tea is decent, but I have a feeling I would love it much more were the tack-piano never discovered by Matthew Friedberger. A piano would sound x10 better in every instance, guaranteed.

bill neil (inabillity), Friday, 28 April 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)

Unprepared piano, that is.

bill neil (inabillity), Friday, 28 April 2006 23:46 (nineteen years ago)

Although it sort of works in the Grandmother case because that sound gives it more of an antiquity feel.

bill neil (inabillity), Friday, 28 April 2006 23:48 (nineteen years ago)

THERE IS NEVER A GOOD REASON TO USE A HARPSICHORD-LIKE SOUND.

sorry, i disagree. it's one of my favorite instruments.

flea market economy (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 29 April 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

out of curiosity, do you know why? to these ears it's unbearably thin and weak and belongs back in the 18th century.

bill neil (inabillity), Saturday, 29 April 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

i just like the clatter of it. it reminds me of a typewriter.

flea market economy (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 29 April 2006 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

It's not my favorite instrument in the world, but I like the way they've used it. I kinda feel like they've overused a little bit on the new album, but it made perfect sense on Rehearsing My Choir. I like the way Matt Friedberger favors distinct, evocative, occasionally obnoxious tones. He's all about treating the sounds like characters, situations, and places, and he gets some good shorthand with certain sounds.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Saturday, 29 April 2006 01:31 (nineteen years ago)

Her singing's kind of faux-Dylanish in "Police Sweater Blood Vow," yeah?

I love how it feels like this band is just hitting their stride, four-plus albums in, especially with the production... this album especially has such an exciting, "sky's the limit" feeling about whatever comes next.

(Minor points off for (accidentally?) transposing two of the digits in the Vietnamese Telephone Ministry's phone number, so people from the internets are calling the # on the album without bothering to check first, and bugging the people who live there.)

(Also for that fucking ginormously annoying tone toward the end of "Whistle Rhapsody.")

morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

what exactly is a tack piano?

tom west (thomp), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

Matthew Friedberger is one half of the brother and sister duo The Fiery Furnaces. After 3 years of work, he has completed his first solo release, a double album titled Winter Women / Holy Ghost Language School, which will be the first release on August 8, 2006 on the newly formed label 859 Recordings run by Keith Wood in upstate New York.

The first disc, Winter Women, clocking in at one hour, showcases Friedberger's strength as a songwriter, and features some of the most accessible pop songs he's ever written, including the infectious "Ruth versus Richard" and the 60s-tinged "Up the River." Women is intended to be a summer record, full of memorable, catchy and un-ironic pop songs.

The second disc, Holy Ghost Language School, is more experimental - a 46 minute sonic novel with the requisite backwards guitars and strange samples which makes Matt’s work so original. It veers closer to some of the Furnaces' more experimental outings, but it's not outright noise, the album as a whole is bound by a strange sense of structure. Some reference points for this record might be Faust, The Residents, or the most "out" moments of Brian Eno's solo records.

Matt wrote and arranged all the music, played all the instruments (except for some drumming from John McEntire from Tortoise on a few tracks), and sings all the songs. The record was co-produced by Bill Skibbe at Key Club Recording at Benton Harbor, Michigan in March of this year.

The Fiery Furnaces launch their European tour this Thursday in Manchester and will wrap it up with an appearance at All Tomorrow's Parties on May 20th. In June they'll be touring the US with a focus on the West Coast and Midwest.

Winter Women track listing:

1. Under The Hood At The Paradise Garage.

2. The Pennsylvania Rock Oil Co. Resignation Letter.

3. Up The River.

4. Ruth versus Richard.

5. Her Chinese Typewriter.

6. Big Bill Crib & His Ladies Of The Desert.

7. Don’t You Remember?

8. Betcha Don’t.

9. PS.213 Mini School.

10. Theme From Never Going Home Again.

11. Motorman.

12. Quick As Cupid.

13. I Love You Cedric.

14. Servant In Distress.

15. Hialeah.

16. Wisconsin River Blues.

Holy Ghost Language School track listing:

1. Seventh Loop Highway.

2. Holy Ghost Language School.

3. The Cross And The Switchblade.

4. I Started Drinking Alcohol At The Age Of Eleven.

5. Do You Like Blondes?

6. Azusa St.

7. Topeka and San Antonio.

8. A Mystical Preparative To Lewdness.

9. Ship Scrap Beach Business.

10. First Day Of School.

11. Things Were Going So Well.

12. All In Vain Or The Opposite.

13. Moral and Epilouge.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)

This guy's on FI-YAHH

morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

It was good when Tori Amos started using a harpsichord because not being able to sustain the notes made her playing much more percussive and agressive, which is always good for her. This is not really Matt's problem, though, so I sort of agree that it exacerbates some of his more frustrating production quirks. (Quirks that Gallowsbird's did a really good job of softening, BTW.)

Eppy (Eppy), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

I'm encouraged by the solo albums because maybe it signals an acknowledgement of the need for a bit more quality control on the Furnaces records. I also hope Eleanor uses the time to write a bunch of songs on her own.

Eppy (Eppy), Monday, 1 May 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

I'm encouraged by the solo albums because maybe it signals an acknowledgement of the need for a bit more quality control on the Furnaces records

Not sure I see it that way. Who knows where the quality material will end up? Will Matt shortchange the FF songbook to boost his solo profile? What it says to me is that the guy is mad prolific, and that perhaps he should spend more time polishing and editing the stuff he has rather than putting things out in a rush job.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 1 May 2006 18:08 (nineteen years ago)

Her singing's kind of faux-Dylanish in "Police Sweater Blood Vow," yeah?

that occurred to me before... it's an '80s dylan (that ticcy, clipped empire burlesque voice, which i love) rather than a '60s dylan!


Minor points off for (accidentally?) transposing two of the digits in the Vietnamese Telephone Ministry's phone number, so people from the internets are calling the # on the album without bothering to check first, and bugging the people who live there.)

loser that i am, i looked up all those churches, and they exist -- all of 'em are (like the VTM) in the los angeles area. interesting, because one of the professors in the program i'm starting did a photographic documentation project of ethnic houses of worship in los angeles, and this'd be a nice soundtrack.

(Also for that fucking ginormously annoying tone toward the end of "Whistle Rhapsody.")

i think it's great! it's far enough into the album that we might have drifted our attention away a bit, and it makes us come back in and go GAAHHH! they should use that kind of jarringness more (without making a cliche of it).

jbr with a z (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 May 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

i looked up all those churches, and they exist

I could have saved you the trouble. This guy has already done it:

http://www.goodhodgkins.com/?p=39

o. nate (onate), Monday, 1 May 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

I get the sense that Matt made these two albums because a) he's writing at a clip that is entirely incompatible with how any label on earth wants to sell Fiery Furnaces albums (aka Fading Captain Syndrome) b) Eleanor was not interested in working on these records c) he wanted to make records without her for a change.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 1 May 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

It *does* sound like a rush job. Basically I think it sounds skeletal and naked in a bad way. It's lacking any kind of sonic aesthetic or "vibe" while BB and GB had that in spades. Like they were so busy dumping arrangement ideas into the thing that they didn't have time left to give any of it a personal touch.

jason. (jason.), Monday, 1 May 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

I could have saved you the trouble. This guy has already done it:

i did it before he did, not that he'd know that.

jbr with a z (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 May 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

I'm kinda sympathetic to Matt rushing out lots of records because on one hand, he probably thinks that he had better get this all out now while the ideas are coming, and on the other, if you've ever seen the band live, you would know that the songs are never really finished, and keeping changing long after they are recorded.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 1 May 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
live show tonite = loud crunchy rocking minor-key lowensteiny rock-and-roll awesomeness!! This band, I swear!

Best of all was the fast, pounding, HEAVY version of the "faster, hammers" song from "Rehearsing My Choir"...

morris pavilion (samjeff), Saturday, 17 June 2006 05:53 (nineteen years ago)

Oh cool, they brought back "The Garfield El," sweet!

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Saturday, 17 June 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

this album's been making a lot more sense since the cold snap & the power cuts!

also - what're their live sets like these days (apart from "loud, crunchy...)? '04 style cut-ups/medleys of the two most recent albums/the entire catalogue? fairly straight-ahead run-throughs?

etc (esskay), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 03:26 (nineteen years ago)

fiery furnaces reinvented as early nineties post-hardcore indie. it was strange. loud, fast nostalgia. i wasn't crazy about it, but i marvelled at the notion that this might *work* for a lot of new folks in the audience. they've also done away with medleys for the most part.

could someone please tell me that among their fiery furnaces following there is a robust, benevolent bootleg community that has samples from all varieties of fiery furnaces dating back to say blueberry boat? any info appreciated. thx.

blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 03:28 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.