― philT, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― %00, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Arien, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
-al, suddenly not so proud to be from Baltimore
― al, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nitsuh, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
But they are pretty fuckin' funny.
― Brian MacDonald, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Brock K., Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
super proud to be from Baltimore!-
the hype master
― hype master, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
when was the last time the "most read reviews" section was updated? as is, it seems like ricardo villalobos and jose gonazales have been dominating the review readers' interest for about a year or more...
― oo, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)
there's gotta be some crazy ass google action goin' on with "senor smoke."
― da croupier, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
If you'll notice, it's anyone with diacritical marks in their name.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
there's some really old, terrible reviews on that site. probably time to get rid of everything pre-99 or something.
― Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)
I think this one kinda takes the biscuit
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)
wrong/crap in just about every way imaginable
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:29 (eighteen years ago)
At least it's not 1,000 words?
― fukasaku tollbooth, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:35 (eighteen years ago)
i think that wisdom guy's responsible for the 'fantastic' zaireeka review
i have a soft spot for this one:
http://pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22068-tiny-music
― Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:36 (eighteen years ago)
bad reviews that are short irritate me MORE, somehow, than bad reviews that at least go into some depth.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:41 (eighteen years ago)
This one will always have a special place in my heart.
Well, duh. Sorry to go monosyllabic, but... well, duh
Guy just blathers on about how much of a prick he is for 700 words, then reviews the album for maybe 500. Prick.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:00 (eighteen years ago)
that's the dude who gave 0 to zaireeka, actually
talk about an about face!!!!@@!!!
― Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:04 (eighteen years ago)
This thread is making me feel old. I feel like I'm thinking in dial-up.
― fukasaku tollbooth, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
His review of Dark Magus starts out thusly: "Good old Japan. We bomb them, so they horde this Miles Davis gem, out of print for ages in the U.S." wtf?
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)
errr :x
― sleep, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
wow
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)
How on earth did nobody come to edit out the first ten-odd paragraphs of that Soft Bulletin review? When good men do nothing etc
― Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:29 (eighteen years ago)
Meanwhile, Idolator just posted a little story...
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)
so much ugh
― Dominique, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22716-split-personalities
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22719-gay
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)
Hey guys, did you hear Ryan wasn't a very good writer when he was 19?
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
meanwhile http://idolator.com/tunes/more-songs-about-buildings-and-traffic/brooklyn-academy-of-music-to-new-york-city-no-sufjan-no-credibility-264802.php
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
Someone needs to give that High Strung guy a smack around the chops. Although I do like the idea of eschewing one's lips.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
fixed
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
I'm looking forward to his eventual equivalent of Jann S. Wenner's Goddess In The Doorway review, though.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
I thought that's what the 12 Rods review was.
― Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
293 Views
Yeah, maybe Idolator should hide evidence of the number of readers they're getting.
― Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
Paul Banks Living In The Moment (Interscope/Starbucks, 2029) [9.6]
― da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
I think all Gawker sites do that. And if Idolator gets significantly less hits than the other ones, that at least reinforces whole "music is by far the lowest rung on the pop culture ladder" thesis they're always hammering home. (xpost)
― Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
by 2029 this will be the entirety of the review
― strongohulkington, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
"Well, don't want to sound like a dick or nothin', but, ah... it says on this website that this record's fucked up. Ah, he sings like a fag, and his shit's all retarded."
― Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
I've accidentally bought that Ricardo Villalobos album five times now because of this.
― Saxby D. Elder, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
Pfork gets a lot of traffic off google searches for obscure foreign bands, like ~ (Portuguese grime), é (Geneva twee scene), č (Latvian punk underground), ö (Magyar trance), and ť (Czech psych).
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
ysi
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
(Magyar trance)
:-O
― deej, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
(hi dom! all our traffic stats are public, but thanks for your concern)
― maura, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
pwned
― byebyepride, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/
am i the only getting a 404/nginx/0.5.17 message ?
― mark e, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
ok. a temp. blip. move along
― mark e, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
close call
― Hurting 2, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:46 (eighteen years ago)
dude potch fork totally stole my line about that john maus record. do they read this site?
― burt_stanton, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:49 (eighteen years ago)
what was your line?
― banriquit, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
too lazy to look for it, too lazy to read the whole review. I closed my eyes and saw it, so trust me here
― burt_stanton, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
do they read this site?
lolol
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
wow - the maus review was filed on march 12, a few weeks before the maus/legend comment in the thread, but that is incredibly odd.
― scottpl, Friday, 4 April 2008 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
great minds think alike.
― Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 4 April 2008 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
burt_stanton, too.
― Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 4 April 2008 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Ryan+Schreiber
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Saturday, 26 July 2008 23:30 (seventeen years ago)
Coz any Americans might not see this on its other thread....
Are you fucking listening, Pitchfork’s [nabisco] [.]?
― Raw Patrick, Monday, 18 August 2008 12:10 (seventeen years ago)
lol at calling Beth Orton's Trailer Park "William Orbit-produced", which anyone with two ears and a copy of Ray of Light/13/etc. will tell you is clearly not. Props for ""She Cries Your Name" still sounds great, with Orbit's luxuriously gloomy string arrangement" -- Eric Harvey, do you even know who William Orbit is?
― (*)_(*) (Stevie D), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 13:54 (seventeen years ago)
Uh, William Orbit did produce that particular song, but not anything else on the album.
― display names have been changed to protect the innocent (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
He co-wrote the song, but the versions he produced appeared on her debut SuperPinkyMandy and his own Strange Cargo: Hinterland. I'm pretty sure the one on Trailer Park--which is radically different--was Andrew Weatherall
― obscure reference (Stevie D), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:00 (seventeen years ago)
Okay, I may be wrong on that one. I don't have a copy of the album anymore, but I thought he was credited as producing that one.
― display names have been changed to protect the innocent (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:02 (seventeen years ago)
In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
― "Hey, We're Posting!" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:20 (seventeen years ago)
oh shush, fucking up a producer credit is not a blooper.
― obscure reference (Stevie D), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:50 (seventeen years ago)
it's a capital crime
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:52 (seventeen years ago)
it's an insult to naturethe case against god
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:56 (seventeen years ago)
anyone with two ears could tell this
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:57 (seventeen years ago)
cant believe you idiot bags even read pitchfork anymore
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:57 (seventeen years ago)
it's light morning reading
― cutty, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
for idiotbags
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
so is the ny times
― cutty, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
i'm a dork i can't help it
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
Why read when you can watch?
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
i check it every morning to make sure they are shaping the indie world's opinion of Gucci Mane in a positive way /sarge
― Shawty Lo Collier (some dude), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
jeez poor charlie you can tell it's so humiliating for him
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
this is the best list/feature/whatever i've ever seen on pitchfork..
http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7849-the-top-50-music-videos-of-the-1990s/
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 25 August 2010 05:26 (fifteen years ago)
It's the first time I've seen them post a big list/feature/whatever where I liked every selection.. I didn't think it was possible.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 25 August 2010 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
writing on that is really good -- i imagine it was all scott?
― NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 25 August 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah it had to be all scott .. he probably chose the videos too.
I'm a little upset this hasn't recieved more fanfare.. it kinda made my week.
― billstevejim, Friday, 27 August 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
Looks like a great list, at a glance. Really wish I had time to watch 50 YouTube videos and give this some attention. (I've probably seen about half of these videos otherwise... really good stuff.)
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 27 August 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
so this thing has continued into The Top 200 Tracks of the 1990s
http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7854-the-top-200-tracks-of-the-1990s-200-151/
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
and this is what i'd call the best list i've ever seen on pitchfork.
the dance people have brought their a-game entirely.
― Brad Nelson (BradNelson), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 05:57 (fifteen years ago)
seeing 'real love' like 10 spots below 'dry the rain' is the pt at which i throw up my hands & o_O at indie
― NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
okay maybe i have been ignoring the indie choices a little.
― Brad Nelson (BradNelson), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:03 (fifteen years ago)
Top 50 will be lots of indie, I bet we're seeing all the "dance" stuff early (i.e., lower) in the list.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
#1 will be, like, "Summer Babe"
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
#2 will be "Paranoid Android"
#3 will be "The Insistor"
#4 will be butthole surfers 'pepper'
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:19 (fifteen years ago)
just realize markers prob never was around when that was big & felt old :(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4WUlNSx_Wk
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ most liked comment on that vid
MajkeTiTvoje1 month ago 48
Not many bands can become succesful with the word butthole in their name
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
blurb transmitted from the past by ott on an old napkin touched by malkmus.
― Brad Nelson (BradNelson), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
Ironically, despite its enduring legacy as the Neptunes' breakthrough, "SuperThug" wasn't Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo's first chart hit. That belonged to Ma$e, whose "Lookin' At Me" bore the Neptunes' imprimatur and reached no. 8 on Billboard's Hot 100. No one remembers "Lookin' at Me", but "SuperThug", released the same year, is unforgettable.
RUMP SHAKER????????? other than that, p good list so far.
― a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 09:25 (fifteen years ago)
i dont know if chad was involved w/ rump shaker?
― just sayin, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 09:27 (fifteen years ago)
ok the further i get in, the more i start to question things. the top 10 is going to have to be p fucking spectacular to not include groove is in the heart. brothers gonna work it out over terrordome? daytona 500 over winter warz? ice cream over glaciers of ice? got yr money over shimmy/brooklyn zoo? small quibbles, i grant you, in a still v interesting list
― a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
that vids list is aight but kind of heavy on the palm pictures dvd contingent, no?
― i am legernd (history mayne), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
That's an okay list, but where's "Tha Crossroads" and "Return to Innocence"? Both had very memorable videos, even if you don't like the music. And "Come to Daddy" as #1?!! I guess it's technically well done, but fuck that goth shit. As far as horror-inspired Cunningham videos go, "Come on My Selector" and "Afrika Shox" (which isn't even on the list) are both better.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 10:40 (fifteen years ago)
in the singles list: mortal kombat theme is by the lords of acid dudes, not the klf.
― Mosquepanik at Ground Zero (abanana), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
Good list so far, I think, even though the order seems nearly inconsequential at this point.
Nice surprises in the 100-50 range:
Dinosaur Jr "Start Choppin'" over "Freak Scene"Jeff Buckley "Last Goodbye" over "Hallelujah"Disco Inferno "Love Stepping Out" at #74 -- AWESOME!
Questionable choices:
Stereolab "French Disko" over "Jenny Ondioline" -- both great, but I think the latter's their best.REM "Nightswimming" over "Losing My Religion"/"Drive" -- hmmmm.Sonic Youth "100%" over "The Diamond Sea" -- though "100%" gets an excellent blurb, so w/e.GY!BE "Moya" over Swans "Failure" -- I like both, but Swans are clearly superior (and one of GY!BE's biggest touchstones).Public Enemy "Brothers Gonna Work It Out" over "Welcome to the Terrordome" -- *shrug*...
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
I'm perfectly fine with "Got Your Money" and "Daytona 500" repping for ODB/Ghost, btw!
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
ice cream >>>>>>>> glaciers of ice
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
got your money >>>> brooklyn zoo/shimmy shimmy ya
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
tbh, this entire list is so completely baffling that it really transcends pointless message board arguments about right or wrong
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
tbh, nothing really transcends pointless message board arguments about right or wrong
― just sayin, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
I'm curious to know how the representative song for each artist was determined. Was it simply the highest-ranked song when the votes were compiled (and therefore all lower-ranked songs by the artist were dropped)? Or was it discussed beforehand?
the top 10 is going to have to be p fucking spectacular to not include groove is in the heart
Yeah, I thought this was oddly low, too. I'm not too surprised at stuff like "Real Love" over "Dry the Rain" b/c it's not hard for me to imagine that more P4k writers had formative music-listening experiences with Beta Band than with Mary J. Blige, but "Groove Is in the Heart" seems like such a universally beloved classic that it's definitely strange to see it rank below a Godspeed You Black Emperor track.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
i had completely forgotten that beta band existed until this thread
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
is my memory hazy or haven't we had like 30,000 different thread for every pitchfork list where jaymc starts playing slash/fic with the voting process and everyone else pretty much rolls their eyes and says for the billionth time "it's editorial decisions not a democracy"
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
hes not "playing slash/fic" hes "discussing the results" on "a message board"
― max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
i hope the top 10 is interesting, i don't think anyone who reads pfork needs to be told once again how good those same few radiohead/mbv/pavement records are
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
like i can't imagine anyone fistpumping heartily when they see "paranoid android" pop up at #1 or whatever, regardless of whether they like it
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
lol deej -- I've heard that Butthole Surfers song a million times on the radio, although I didn't know it was their song until now. I only really started to pay attention to music in, like, 1998 or something though, and Wikipedia tells me the song was a hit in 1996 . . .
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
i told scott i'd only write about groove is in the heart if it was purposefully kept out of the top 100 just to fuck with people.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
brothers gonna work it out over terrordome? daytona 500 over winter warz? ice cream over glaciers of ice? got yr money over shimmy/brooklyn zoo?
REM "Nightswimming" over "Losing My Religion"/"Drive" -- hmmmm.Sonic Youth "100%" over "The Diamond Sea" -- though "100%" gets an excellent blurb, so w/e.GY!BE "Moya" over Swans "Failure" -- I like both, but Swans are clearly superior (and one of GY!BE's biggest touchstones).Public Enemy "Brothers Gonna Work It Out" over "Welcome to the Terrordome" -- *shrug*...
Y'all are kidding with this, right?
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
ilx never kids.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
ilxor the poster gets wildly sincere about pfork lists
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
Noted. Fwiw, I think p4k is kinda killin it.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
to be fair, p4k lists are serious, serious business.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
Well, do you know for a fact that it's editorial decisions or are you just presuming that it is? "Editorial decisions" is too vague to tell me anything, anyway. I suspect that the editors shuffle a few things around, but I'd like to think they're not determining the entire list themselves.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
I only really started to pay attention to music in, like, 1998 or something though
That does make me feel old, though I really only started to pay attention to music in 1990.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
oh my god dude
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
jaymc all the p4k lists are made the same way: staff votes + editorial massaging
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting that in the 90s video list, 15 of the top 20 videos are from 97-99.
I noticed this because I hadn't seen many of the videos, and those years were really the only years in the 90s that I wasn't watching mtv like 10 hours a day.
― Falkor Johnson (askance johnson), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)
to be fair a lot of early 90s videos were REALLY bad. unless someone wants to make a case for collective soul rocking out in the woods.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
Collective Soul. In the woods. Rocking out. Directed by Michel Gondry.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
i'm kind of surprised Modest Mouse and (especially) D-Plan are so far on the list, honestly expected them to enter the top 50
― V79, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know, p4k tends to like Built to Spill a little more than Modest Mouse, and Dismemberment Plan seems like something they're just clinging to, so it makes sense to me that they'd be 100-51 range.
I'm pretty stoked that they chose "Trailer Trash." I'm not sure that Modest Mouse had a pivotal cultural moment in the 90's on the level of some of this other stuff, but for me and my friends "Trailer Trash" was earth-shattering.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
Harvey Danger wuz robbed
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
perusing this track list, even the songs I don't like deserve to be on it
big ups for including "It's A Fine Day", puzzled look for (apparently?) bumping "Charly" for it
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
also MASSIVE ups for including "Wicked"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
actually this is kind of a top 600, considering the "see also" choices
puzzled look for (apparently?) bumping "Charly" for it
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, September 1, 2010 11:19 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
1 per artist, remember
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
i thought wicked over it was a good day was a smart move
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
Definitely. Also, I feel like you guys are picking a lot more up-tempo stuff than in the p4k 500.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
When do we handicap the top 50?
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
I think the only 90s PE track I would pick over "Brothers Gonna Work It Out" is maybe "Burn, Hollywood, Burn". If "Fight The Power" hadn't been released in '89 that would have been a no-brainer.
So which Prodigy track is going to actually make it? IIRC they haven't shown up yet and if it's "Voodoo People" or "Firestarter" I'm going to hurt myself rolling my eyes. (It should be "Charly", "Everybody in the Place" or maaaaaybe "Out of Space" or "No Good (Start the Dance); I personally would pick "One Love" but that's me, I know not everyone else is as infatuated with that track as I am.)
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
"No Good (Start the Dance)" or "Breathe"
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork loves "My Boo."
My day is made.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
it should be "out of space" but i seriously doubt ANY prodigy will make the list.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
unless a lot of folks who were in high school/college at the time have some nostalgic fondness for "firestarter."
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ this is what I am afraid of
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
and i say this as the guy who wrote the "no good" blurb for the book.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
but i mean, i'm happy to be proven wrong.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
haha now watch, it will be #4: "Diesel Power" and we'll all be sitting here going "... huh"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
If we're being honest I merely get bored and like to waste a little time with my over-analytical tendencies. Applies to pretty much everything in life, btw, not just Pfork lists -- which are fun to comment on because people react so *seriously* about it!
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
Alright, if nobody else is going to, I'm gonna take a shot at the top 50.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)
Unless that's a not cool move for some reason. Now's the time to let me know.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
for fucks sake just wait two days, jesus
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
Aiight then. You don't have to yell. Shit.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)
he does, actually.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)
biological thing.
wait, did Oasis make it to the top 50 or did they not make it at all, because either way would be a bit ridiculous
― V79, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think, given their success, it would be particularly ridiculous for Oasis to appear in the top 50
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
even though I hate them
Ok, yall, I would seriously have an opinion on this if I could figure out what the pitchfork "narrative" is anymore. Like circa-1999 it was contrarian to RS/Blender/Pazz/VH1 canon, then circa-2004 it was contrarian to the Spin alterna-canon. And now I can't even figure out what it's trying to be at all. Like contrarian to the know-it-alls on ILX?
Like take the Public Enemy choice for example.
1. The old school RS/Blender/Vh1 thinking would have given that to "911 Is A Joke" easy—already on the vh1 list, political AND pop, everything hip-hop is "supposed to be" in the rockist viewpoint, both critically lauded AND a pop hit.
OK, but P4k can't be canon-loving rockists, so take it down to...
2. The kind of Wire/Signal To Noise/20JFG noise-is-art thinking, which would have given it to "Welcome To The Terrordome," no question. Avant-geeks traditionally stump for this because it's their most noisy, and also handily ties into shit like Burroughs, Girl Talk, mashup, copyrightlaw, plunderphonics, Tigerbeat6, etc...
But that's maybe whiteboy Spin-reader thinking, so...
3. The genre expert thinking: They seem to employ a lot of rap nerds/dance nerds on their staff these days to get lot of "genre voices"—really noticable this time out with all the dance stuff on this list, and helps them get the REAL SOUND of the genre from the REAL EXPERTS--which is def smart and appreciated (and RARELY done anywhere else, so kudos to fork on that) to not get token dance songs rock dudes who sometimes listen to Aphex Twin. However, any self-respecting XXL/Ego Trip/Vibe/noz/Complex whatever rap head would give it to "Shut Em Down (Pete Rock Remix)." It was a tunnel banger, probably the biggest "rap fan" Public Enemy song of the 90s.
So really, after you exhaust all those lines of thinking, what is choosing "Brothers Gonna Work It Out" actually saying?
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
they like it the best?
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
man y'all are some pychonian down-the-rabbit-hole motherfuckers
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
haha xpost
also lol at Whiney clowning others for overanalyzing the assembly of the list and then immediately after writing a 500-word post overanalyzing the assembly of the list
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:22 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
omg dude you were just making fun of jay-z for writing 'slash/fic'
― max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
omg
jaymc
what am i doing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_40kJlo9P4g
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
"Brothers Gonna Work It Out" is not any less noisy than "Welcome To The Terrordome" (and neither is "911 Is A Joke", for that matter)
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
jumping through the plate glass of pitchfork's expectations
― swagula (Lamp), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
Public Enemy never got it right til they did "Give It Up" on Muse Sick-N-Hour Mess Age - YOU KNOW IT'S THE TRUTH
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
here's a new expression I'm working on: "You can't be too cool for school and then turn around and submit a thesis." What do you think?
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh no
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
i was just thinking about this on my way to lunch and then typed it up when i got home, eesh
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
for real, though; remove the anti-Semitism and no one would have given two shits about "Welcome To The Terrordome" aside from the line "Hear the drummer get wicked!"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
They don't have wifi at subway yet?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)
xpost as dumb as you think my posts are, congrats on topping it
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)
ok, someone send up the Ott signal, i don't feel like talkin about this anymore
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
SUCCESS
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
it's kind of amazing to me that EVERY TIME pitchfork runs a list the conspiracy theorists come out of the woodwork for what amounts to a tabulation of ballots submitted by individuals.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
uh, i still agree w/ u strongo
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)
"there MUST be some deeper meaning!" yeah, and your toaster is talking to you, too.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney G TalkingOutBothSidesOfHisMouthgarten
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, wow individuals can't be subject to critical trends, I MUST BE WEARING MY TON FOIL HAT
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)
especially individuals who all write for the same place, how could they possibly influence each other, what a mad, mad, mad world
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:31 (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hi dere, this is stupid.
also yes i feel ashamed for forgetting the shut 'em down remix. 3xdope is that.
― a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
Max, you can call me Jay-Z if you like. ;-)
― jaymc, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
Can we instead talk about how neither "cmon ride the train" or "this is how we do it" are gonna make the list?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
like smug fucking dan perry with his "UH THEY LIKE IT BETTER ASSHOLE" but if you can't see the types of things that these type of ppl stump for changing over time, i honestly don't think you're paying attention, duderoo
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
how can you possibly wear a foil hat that weighs a ton!?
― max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
mihatweighsaton
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
this is ridiculously funny
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
do you guys actually read pitchfork
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
I just scroll down threads made about it
I read this list because ppl were talking about it
Then apparently I gave Whiney an aneurysm by making a hyperbolic unprovable assertion
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
Not to, you know, actually engage with your question, Whiney (especially since you took your ball and went home), but... To me, this list has been about clearing away a lot of the critical detritus from the 90's and calling out the stuff that actually resonated/resonates that didn't get magazine play back then. So you get "Your Woman," "Steal My Sunshine," "Lovefool," "Freedom '90" and other pop moments that haven't gotten a lot of critical play; you get all the indie touchstones, naturally; and you get the most lasting rap moments of the 90's (I'm expecting "Passin' Me By" and "Mind Playin' Tricks on Me" and "T.R.O.Y." in the top 50, for example.)
The problem with "Brothers Gonna Work it Out" is that it fits more in the overlooked gems catagory than the rap classics catagory (cuz there are a handful of PE songs ahead of it there.) But in terms of p4k's overall narrative, it seems pretty reasonable to me.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
Not to, you know, actually engage with your question, Whiney (especially since you took your ball and went home)
haha no he didn't!
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.anthonyfernando.com/uploads/Image/PositiveThinking.jpg
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)
btw I was the one who said "they like it best" so I would like my full credit for being smug and not paying attention
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
"but if you can't see the types of things that these type of ppl stump for changing over time, i honestly don't think you're paying attention, duderoo"
dude seriously it makes it very hard to engage you on this topic when you're essentially calling me "these type of ppl"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
well, i just just mean pfk ppl. All writers—self included—are wittingly or unwittingly part of some narrative, whether it be Stylus, Spin, Pazz and Jop or the Hype Machine. I just want to better understand why the pfk narrative has evolved into what it has.
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
it's the inevitable consequence of eclecticism.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
xpost
Seems like you already know though. New writers come in, read the old stuff, and go "not this but this." The site is having an ongoing conversation with itself, and with other publications.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
Also what he said.
The site is having an ongoing conversation with itself, and with other publications.
i basically said this upthread and ppl went NUH UH
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
also i dunno man a lot of the dance and rap blurbs have been written by people i would not in a million years consider experts in the field.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
not to uh denigrate my peers or anything
well, i'm not gonna shit on any of the writers, but i can def say the dance/rap picks look a way more up on their game and less indie-rock "token-choice" than they would have in 2004.
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)
"T.R.O.Y." in the top 50
This is definitely NOT gonna happen (sadly) and if it does I'll eat my fucking shoe.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
oh well yeah i'm not gonna argue THAT either. xpost.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
which radiohead track will be top 5
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
I heard sugar rays fly yesterday and sang along w/ it
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)
I'm assuming "Paranoid Android"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:02 (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol what? troy is a fucking lock.also jordan i think this is how we do it will be in it w/ no diggity as the two big r&b ranked tracks?
― a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
No TROY would be a damn shame.
I'm going to go ahead and call a Radiohead lower than expected shocker.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
Wasn't "This Is How We Do It" listed as a "see also" track to something?
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
lol what? troy is a fucking lock.
I'd be surprised if Public Enemy dropped at #51 and Pete Rock/CL Smooth made it ahead of them, but I'm certainly happy to be proven wrong. Either way... Public Enemy is TOO LOW!
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, to "Poison" at #86
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
strange thread
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)
Well, that probably has more to do with you being the one that said it. Fwiw, I think you're totally spot on.
Anyway, I tend to look at music lists as "check this out first"s more than as "this is best"s, and then "if you like it, take it and run with it." 99.9% of p4ks audience are going to be unfamiliar with most of those songs, and they're going to read this list and have a ton of awesome new directions to run in with their music collections. Which is why the one song per artist rule and the see also sections are awesome. I think p4k is doing an amazing job of facilitating other people's curiosity.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)
"Karma Police" has a (very tiny) chance at placing instead, I'd say.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)
Public Enemy's 80's singles just have a huge edge over their 90's singles.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
"Tubthumping" better win this
also loool @ jay-z/jaymc
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)
Enjoy the silence & pictures of you I think might qualify for this
And see also: ordinary world
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
The real question is, will they choose One in a million or Are you that somebody?
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)
Ice cream got fuckin robbed.. shoulda been top 20 imo
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)
Ice Cream-->Got Your Money-->Daytona 500-->something off 36 Chambers-->seems like a pretty solid Wu-progression to me
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)
Bring The Pain, doy
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
I'll tell ya who wuz/will be robbed: Busta!
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
Probably cream but they might choose shame on a nuh
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)
Bring da Ruckus and Protect Ya Neck also legit choices
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)
In other words: Damn.
― slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
any guesses for mbv? they're not really "hit single" kind of guys.
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
"Soon." And I'm gonna guess it'll be top 5.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
everyone forgets "to here knows when" was a single u_u
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
wu track in the top 50 has to be either cream or triumph doesn't it? anything else is kinda challops
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:18 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
yep
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
who gets the highest track: pavement or biggie
thkw? i was thinking only shallow, at least. i'd puke if they pulled up 'sometimes', even tho i enjoy the song immensely. only for reason of it being in lost in translation and thus the new baby of adoring indie girls worldwide.
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
fuck biggie, pavement's got it cinched.
I think I'd pick "Only Shallow", personally
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
would like to see shook ones but i dunno if that's part of the Rap For Pitchfork Readers canon
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
"in the mouth a desert" gets my personal pavement pick (triple p)
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
god hope 'spit on a stranger' lands nowhere on the list
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
i wouldn't be surprised if "soon" is #1.
― only guy in the world (prolego), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
Perpetua breaks it down:
We had a nomination process in which we suggested songs and talked about what was important in a range of genres and categories which were determined in advance to keep things diverse. When it came to artists with many great songs, we worked toward consensus in narrowing it down to one to three iconic songs. A shortlist of something like 600 songs was established, and we each had to pick 100 for our ballot. After voting was complete, the editors chose to bring it down to one song per artist, which was done in the interest of covering more ground.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
which was done in the interest of covering more ground
― slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
i wonder if perpetua gets voted off the island now that he's revealed the sinister inner workings of tristeropitchfork
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
I read that a bit ago and thought "600?" If we were doing this poll on ILM, we'd have 600 nominations in about an hour.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris)
the only pavement song I ever fawned overeverything else I've ever heard by them never packed a punch - nothing I ever wanted to own
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
We had a nomination process in which we suggested songs and talked about what was important in a range of genres and categories
= every shade of dance music imaginable and practically zero heavy metal
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
there was metal on the shortlist, i know that much.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
a range is a range
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
good point
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
man, I hope "The Memory Remains" wins the poll
== every shade of dance music imaginable and practically zero heavy metal salsa music
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
I for one am bitterly disappointed in the lack of plena
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
oh here we go with this one
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
SOMEONE just got back from p.r. didn't they
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
yeah I have some bombass vids to upload to Facebook later
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
a range is a range life
― like a musical album. made by a band. (fucking in the streets), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
we could settle down y'all
― markers, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
Top 50 predictions list (feel free to c/p and add. some might end up in the See Also)
BjorkBeckCakeTalk Talk (The Ascension hasn't been mentioned yet has it?)RadioheadBuilt to SpillMy Bloody ValentineDepeche ModeMetallica (I know the were mentioned once in see also)NirvanaAlice in ChainsNiNSoundgardenStone Temple Pilots
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
+Red Hot Chili PeppersU2ColdplayThe Goo Goo Dolls
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
^^warning^^typos^^
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
SoundgardenStone Temple Pilots
http://www.papamiket.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/death-to-america-chant.jpg
― i am legernd (history mayne), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
STP are already on the list iirc
― elephant rob, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
ahhhh, I thought STP wouldnt get anything besides a see also
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
I had real trouble putting enough context in my blurbs b/c I just kinda blithely assumed on some level that "The Angels Fell" and "Beau Mot Plage" and "Love Stepping Out" were universally acknowledged classics that everyone already knew and loved. Of course that couldn't be further from the truth ;_;
I feel like my notion of "what mattered in the 90s" is actually much more cloistered within an ILM worldview than my sense of the 00s, oddly.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)
Alice In Chains "Would" was already on the list.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)
lol history mayne you just gave me the best lol <3
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
Whatever... "Sometimes" is so sick. I would love to see it place.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:20 (fifteen years ago)
Still, Kevin Shields did so much more than have a droning guitar overlay acoustic. Sometimes is the song that can get somebody from the "mainstream" into MBV, the rest of the discography is where the real genius lies.
And I make it sound like sometimes is the weakest song from mbv, fuck no, i love the song and it really has this aural nostalgia about it i love. i just think mbv has much more deserving songs than the one that is the most popular download off itunes (again, that would be "sometimes").
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)
Good to see George Michael get a bit of respect, you tell em Pitchfork. Freedom 90 is easy one of the best singles of that decade.
― piscesx, Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)
the CEO of pitchfork just told me the top 5 5. hey jealousy 4. summer girls 3. good vibrations 2. little black backpack 1. windowlicker
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 04:52 (fifteen years ago)
Well certainly "Windowlicker" would be a shock #1 but I think we're all expecting "Little Black Backpack" to be waaaaaayy up there.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)
windowlicker is hardly THE VERY BEST SONG of the 90's. maybe in the top 50. but for fucks sake.
― oohhh weennnddddyyy weennnddyy what went wrrrooonnnnggg (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:42 (fifteen years ago)
and there is your Oasis.
― Bee OK, Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:57 (fifteen years ago)
wtf Enjoy The Silence is really not gonna make the cut? Really?
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
rollie pimperton was hating on 'check the rhime' in hipinion ... idg that its totally a classic & perfect representation of what they did well
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
I'm no Smashing Pumpkins die hard in the first place, but if you're only going to represent their spot in the '90s with one song, WHY WOULD YOU CHOOSE "1979"?!
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:03 (fifteen years ago)
it's what i would choose
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:03 (fifteen years ago)
It's their most beloved song, and it's awesome.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:04 (fifteen years ago)
ok, whatever dudes.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, not considering some of the garbage Corgan has recorded under that name recently, "1979" is probably the most atypical unrepresentative S.P. song there is. I don't hate it, but it's an anomaly.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, no
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
song kicks ass also. and gets votes from ppl like me who arent about to put 'cherub rock' above adina howard
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
rollie pimperton was hating on 'check the rhime' in hipinion ... idg that its totally a classic & perfect representation of what they did well --the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej)
It's basically the big atcq song with no gimmicks--can i kick it had Lou reed, segundo had a story, Bonita had the luv angle, scenario had busta, award tour had de la, sucka n---- had politics... This was just Tribe doin Tribe. If it was their best song is up for debate (it's maybe their fifth best IMO) but it's certainly a simple capturing of what they do best
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
Also 1979 was a piece of terrible shit even in like 1996 when I was a fucking smashing pumpkins fan
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:13 (fifteen years ago)
buggin' out
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
My friend used to sing 1979 as
"ner ner nernerner TUNA FISH"
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
1979 is a jam, no doubt, but also bullet w butterfly wangs
Electric Relaxation
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
Both accurate re: atcq but rime was a bigger hit
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
electric relaxation is the only one fuckin w/ check the rhime but the latter def better captured the vibe better & the chorus was discernable
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
I would have went "scenario" tbh
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ plus yeah
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
I kinda love that Electric Relaxation has no discernible chorus..
― billstevejim, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
There really isn't any reason to deny the awesomeness of scenario for real
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:18 (fifteen years ago)
i agree re: electric relaxation i mean its a goofy fun track for that reason but it also disqualifies it as coolest tribe track to me for some reasonscenario is awesome. but idk, for a one-track-per-artist list i totally get why it wd get a pass
btw was just watching 'the hip hop shop' ad on fuse @ my girls place & rakim says he likes drake. :-/ to end all :-/
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
check the rhime has my all-time fave tip verse "if knowledge is the key then just show me the lock"
― symsymsym, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
it's basically impossible to pick just one best tribe song, all of the 7 or 8 top contenders are unimpeachable
― symsymsym, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:29 (fifteen years ago)
really enjoying this list/writing/youtube searches, would bit-torr3nt these 200 songs
― symsymsym, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:36 (fifteen years ago)
it's a damn good list, but i'm wondering what the big deal is. seems pitchfork-ish, though slightly more tilted towards dance/pop/rap/r&b inclusiveness than one might expect. but not enough to seem like a radical about-face in terms of editorial taste or anything.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:04 (fifteen years ago)
what's the big deal about anything really
― symsymsym, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:13 (fifteen years ago)
I never noticed before but they're right: 'Autumn Sweater' is an amazing makeout song.
― Moka, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:15 (fifteen years ago)
do tell
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:15 (fifteen years ago)
The real gem for me in the whole Smashing Pumpkings catalogue is 1979's b-side 'set the ray to jerry'.
― Moka, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:24 (fifteen years ago)
deej, the one guest rapper on rakim's last album was.......maino :-/
― bernard goony (The Reverend), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:48 (fifteen years ago)
picking Check the Rhime = :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
wish they included emusic/insound links for these songs (or at least identify the album on which each song appears). tracking down the correct album can be a chore.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 2 September 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
― bernard goony (The Reverend), Thursday, September 2, 2010 2:48 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
thats not that bad really, i mean, at least no one is celebrating that dude for saving rap.
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)
"Car" really changed the world forever, didn't it. "Kicked it in the Sun" #1?
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, "1979" is definitely the Pumpkins song that non-Pumpkins fans like. I owned Siamese Dream like most white Midwestern 14-year-olds at the time, but I'd probably go with "1979," too, for the same reason I'd go with "Lost in the Supermarket" over anything else on London Calling.
― jaymc, Thursday, 2 September 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
Agree; "1979" is definitely Corgan's finest hour personally/creatively/commercially/blablabla. You can't really put you know "Apathy's Last Kiss" on there per Moka's post. Though it's my personal fave. "Glynis" is a nice haunter too; almost proto witch haus, right Scott? Pfft.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
Well unless I accidentally included some artists who have already been on the list, I think I figured out who will be filling up 16 out of the 20 remaining slots on the list:
Notorious BIGWu Tang ClanNirvana PavementMy Bloody ValentineAphex TwinWeezerRadioheadNeutral Milk HotelDj ShadowDaft PunkBjorkBeckTalk TalkDr DreBelle And Sebastian
― MarkoP, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
holy shit they picked Stardust
I love this list
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
and "Setting Sun"!!!!!!
wish "Unfinished Sympathy" was higher
jeez, when did Pitchfork turn into... me
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
In the spirit of overanalysis...
Joys:
"Everlong" -- as perfect a rock song as was released in the '90s.The Pharcyde at #41 -- didn't think they might place!"TROY" at #35 -- *eats shoe*
Disappointments:
No mention of PJ Harvey's post-Rid of Me material (her best)."Unfinished Sympathy" at #44 -- there had better be some good shit ahead of this! I'd say it's top 20 material."The Private Psychedelic Reel" a notch below "Setting Sun" -- really?"1979" being the Pumpkins' representative track -- LOL NOSTALGIA
Surprises:
GBV at #36 -- I thought these guys were going top ten!!The Flaming Lips at #30 -- again, I thought they were "Pfork Canon" material and would place much higher. Wasn't The Soft Bulletin #3 on Pfork's previous '90s albums list? I think it was... oh well.Spiritualized "Ladies and Gentlemen"... ELVIS VERSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
They can't possibly chart Talk Talk that high on an individual song basis. I don't think you'll DJ Shadow on there either but maybe "Mutual Slump"?
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
i think they could chart 'after the flood' or 'new grass' but yeah i don't think it'd fit the spirit of the list so much
i would expect dj shadow though, building steam maybe
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
'midnight in a perfect world' seems like the obvi one
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
"Midnight" to me deviates from his personal style too much, I never liked it. It feels cribbed. I don't know, being picky.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
they'll probably go 'in flux'
Before "Girls & Boys", Blur were seen as just another Britpop band, maybe a couple notches above Dodgy.
yeah, no.
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
God that's horrid. I think it's better to refrain from posting excerpts and stick to placement...
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
I think if they are going to include a Talk Talk song, it'll be "Ascension Day" and for DJ Shadow it'll be "Midnight in a Perfect World". This is because they were included in their Pitchfork 500 list from 2007: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pitchfork_500 , which I think has been a pretty good indicator as to what songs would put into this list since I don't think the general attitudes to the 90s and the staff at Pitchfork has changed a lot in the past 2 or 3 years.
― MarkoP, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
xp: I don't know that that's an unfair reading of Blur's profile in the US.
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
"Midnight" to me deviates from his personal style too much
This is pretty much what propelled "1979" to the list, though. I'd expect "Midnight" to place.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
could still be a track from Violator to come, right? that was 1990?
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)
also slowdive - alison
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
i don't get this list at all tbh
it's fine to be eclectic (i guess) but this just feels like two groups of people in mutual incomprehension, basically indietards + rap/dance heads
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
"Enjoy the Silence" in the top 20 would be mind-boggling to me (and Depeche Mode is one of my favorite bands)
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
"Enjoy the Silence" has to be in there, song was extramassive.
In re: Blur/US, nobody in the US knew what "Britpop" was, so, they couldn't well be seen as "just another Britpop band". Statement is a mess.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Yep. I don't think I've seen Depeche Mode on the list, so I'm pretty sure they will be in there.
Alison was already mentioned in the See Also for Spiritualized's "Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space (Elvis Version)" at 23.
― MarkoP, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
oh rats
it's probably my favorite rock song that hadn't placed yet
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
And mayne I said about the same [on hipinion], it's a disconnected series of impulses. Received wisdom V personal tastes V editorial bent V ret-conning the past such that it fits with/informs the present...
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
WTF u talkin' bout, Depeche Mode has always been a lock for the top 20.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
"it's a disconnected series of impulses"
this is sometimes also called life.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:01 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
The term hadn't even been coined yet - statement is a double mess
(if they'd said that it was the song w/ which Blur changed their game up without being vaguely snarky about bands the writer probably barely ever heard, that would have been legit I think)
― great British wasteman = u (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
That's awesome strongo. Happy 90210.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
you used to be better at this.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
not sure how many "rap/dance heads" there are
you dont really have to be a rap head to know & love a lot of the rap songs on this list but dance existed in sort of a different context during this time period, like you could listen to 2pac and green day on the radio but you probably wouldn't hear the orb
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
is guided by voices' 1995 track 'game of pricks' really the 36th best song of the 1990s?
like a whole s.tonne of picks, it's a completely unremarkable indie record
even the dude who did the blurb hasn't done his research. "The whole thing's just over a minute and a half long" -- yes, it's three quarters of a minute over a minute and a half long.
if it was in my toilet i wouldn't bother to flush [via 90s zings]
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
GBV at #36 -- I thought these guys were going top ten!!
for a different song or
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)
Yup. See above re: "Car". Also really tired of "T.R.O.Y." as the go-to "I have a friend who's black!" hip-hop "awareness" herald.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)
And mayne I said about the same [on hipinion], it's a disconnected series of impulses. Received wisdom V personal tastes V editorial bent V ret-conning the past such that it fits with/informs the present...― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, September 2, 2010 10:05 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, September 2, 2010 10:05 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
how come we're getting these diplomatic ott posts and hipinion gets awesome hardman stuff like
The thing that kills me is Tim, like Ewing and the other ILMers, hate Pitchfork. They hate Ryan. But their desire to be read, to communicate, and try to drive dialog, is stronger, so they're functionally hostages of Pitchfork's success. There's a whole class there that pissed on Pitchfork from 2000-2006 but then waddled through the door with their USB cables between their legs, rationalizing it by pretending ScottPL's presence makes it OK. Nate Patrin in particular shocked me, that he sunk to that; I called him out for it on ILM, he was just rabidly anti-P4K for years. Breihan surprised me as well. I mean...I understand the sensation that's driven them to make this and other compromises, but I don't understand how, after going through the process for long enough to realize there is no material gain on the other side of it, you don't make the decision to write for satisfaction, and separate it from making a living. Because you can't make a living that way, and the compromises you have to make in trying devalue the whole process. How can you delude yourself for this long?
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)
Because you haven't earned my trust.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
this list is reminding me to buy Pharcyde
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
xpost we knew you first u_u
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
lol
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
how can we possibly hate pitchfork in the same way as we did circa '99 to '04 when a good 75 percent of the writers' roster has turned over?
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)
Because of the 25% that hasn't, obviously. And let's not pretend the recent crop is exactly storming the gates of literary or critical canonization.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:18 (1 minute ago) Permalink
this song rules d00d.
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)
GBV at #36 -- I thought these guys were going top ten!!for a different song or
I was anticipating "I Am a Scientist" in the top 10-20. Not that I'd rank it there myself, I agree that individual GBV songs can be unremarkable on their own, but I thought Pfork would disagree.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
oh i dunno, ott. most of the writers i most hated from old-school pitchfork have long since given up their stake in it (if not their obsession with it).
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, September 2, 2010 9:26 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
list is 'weird' i guess -- lol lists amirite -- but its also one id much rather listen to than a comparable list from 03 so
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
yes strongo, it's wrong and embarrassing to have feelings about music criticism.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)
it really is, but what else can a poor boy do.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
ok quick question just out of curiosity, was there any tori amos in the list?
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
i do think there's a sort of weird duality here of pfork simultaneously trying to redefine itself, evidenced by all the landmark rap,dance,pop tracks in the list, while still clinging to its indie-is-the-best roots as evidenced by the high placing of "game of pricks", "car", "race for the prize", etc, none of which were as big or important or popular as a lot of the lower tracks in the list
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
there was a tori amos track in a 'see also' iirc
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
ok cool, just wondering. a small smh and i'll go back to happily ignoring this bs
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
"God" was a border jam.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)
"border jam"? what like...nearly a jam but not quite?
it's an excellent song, tho far from her best
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
Would it be too much to ask for Camp Lo to sneak into the top 20?
― scott pgwp (pgwp), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, it bordered on being a jam. It was a preserve.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
marmalade
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
god this is like if adrian dantley was giving interviews moaning about the pistons twenty years later. get a job already loser. grow up.
― balls, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)
Fucking happy to see No Diggity presumably make the top 20.
(If it doesn't now, I may send anthrax to numerous pfork writers. Or forget all about and just go listen to Blackstreet.)
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)
xposthttp://i39.tinypic.com/23m7tjd.jpg
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
Fucking happy to see No Diggity presumably make the top 20.(If it doesn't now, I may send anthrax to numerous pfork writers. Or forget all about and just go listen to Blackstreet.)― a hoy hoy, Thursday, September 2, 2010 3:41 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, September 2, 2010 3:41 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark
already charted
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
Did it? Oh my bad for missing it.
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
i mean who does this and then actually gets self righteous about it when called out on it. ps: caring about 'music criticism' past the point where you're being carded for tobacco = yes, actually pathetic, not honorable. pretending to care about 'music criticism' when really you're just pretending loudly you didn't fuck up severely years ago and years later still haven't figured out a next step = adult diapers level pathetic. grow up. get a job.
― balls, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
balls.
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
yawns.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
adult diapers level pathetic
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
this calm cool detachment routine is extra fun since whiney's hipinion reveal
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
jesus christ what type of psycho loser posts on MULTIPLE BOARDS about a PITCHFORK LIST?????
not surprised growing up and getting a job doesn't interest ott but 'which built to spill song did they pick and where did it place?' leaves him riveted. pathetic.
― balls, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
ott = buster bluthryan pfork = lucille
― balls, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
ott has a job and makes twice as much as some pitchfork writer's yearly income iirc
[deej, help me out w/ this post?]
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
to be fair, i'm pretty sure ott is grown up and has a job. i'm not sure this obviates your complaints, though.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney, btw I haven't received set 24/24 yet. I sent an email asking for an expected delivery date, no response. Can you check in?
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
i think what i was trying to say before is that these multi-genre lists start to look silly if you're coming at each genre from a different perspective. like, if your rock canon has built to spill and guided by voices at the top, then ok fine. but then why does your rap canon have biggie and wu-tang instead of like...company flow or black moon or something?
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
xpost, I know for a fact that 24/24 wasn't goin to u, dude!
markers got 1/24 i believe
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
And why do you need to collide these in an overarching single list, that's - nobody's fault - but that's the problem with the 1990s. The genre activity was so stratified and flourishing at different times, it just doesn't lend itself well to any fell-swoop summation.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
Well the money was drawn out of my account, so something better be coming to me.
whats a 24/24?
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
anyhow gotta run a lowry's. pox on both yr houses if freak nasty doesn't make top ten.
― balls, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
Dunno if segregation is really the way forward though. HEY BLACK PEOPLE WAIT YR TURN, WE R CURRENTLY LISTENING TO WHITE PPL (and tv on the radio, depending on timeframe.)
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
be better if they just didn't include so many dull guitar records
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
kept hearing method man's "get emmmm" after each balls post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKJC8GAxT5I
― am0n, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
weren't dull guitar records one of the defining trends of 90s music though?
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
Little Fluffy Clouds should have been top ten.
― dsb, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
or top twenty at least!
― dsb, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
I checked and lucky for them "Da Butt" was '89. Totally would have called them out on that shit.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
Before "Girls & Boys", Blur were seen as just another Britpop band, maybe a couple notches above Dodgy.yeah, no.― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, September 2, 2010 9:49 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, September 2, 2010 9:49 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
Looks like they changed this part (assuming that was a C&P from the Pfork blurb) to this now:
Before "Girls & Boys", Blur were a successful UK indie band
― Position Position, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
haha
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
o snap
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
face<IMG SRC="http://healthy-aging.advanceweb.com/SharedResources/Images/2009/072009/POM_16ozBottle.jpg">
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)
Awesome it's even better that way.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
currently considering the possibility that banaka is ott
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
something tells me "They Want EFX" is not gonna make this list
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
theres a lot of stuff that didnt make it that id put ahead of das efx's 3rd best song
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
This. Especially if it's going to place above Geto Boys.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 2 September 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
Also, is "Spottieottiedopaliscious" going to make the top 20? Because that would be solid.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 2 September 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
Looking like the top 20's gonna be about 40% rap, r&b, dance; about 60% indie touchstones. That's not a bad ratio for p4k.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 2 September 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
this just feels like two groups of people in mutual incomprehension, basically indietards + rap/dance heads
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:00 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark
terribly unfair, but still pretty accurate. i'd say it's more like 3 streams: basic p4k indie, rap/pop/r&b and dance music (as defined by UK tastes in). and it's kind of weird to me that they've worked so hard two incorporate these two worlds, but haven't broadened their tastes in other directions. list contains hardly any experimental/noise stuff, "world music", garage or punk rock, metal, contemporary composers, jazz or other improvisation, etc.
not that those absences are a flaw of any sort - they aren't - but it's interesting to me that p4k has decided to expand their brand in these two specific directions (basically rap & dance) and not in others. just a year or two back, for instance, they seemed to be making a serious attempt to incorporate metal, but lately that seems to have been relegated to outlier status. maybe the readership didn't bite?
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
for instance, they seemed to be making a serious attempt to incorporate metal, but lately that seems to have been relegated to outlier status. maybe the readership didn't bite?
stosuy jumped ship to stereogum iirc
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, and i'm the biggest whiner when it comes to including genres, but it always looks a little cloying when experimental stuff shows up in track countdowns. Because it sort of says, "Yeah, 'Make Em Say Uhhh' was a classic single and all, BUT HAVE YOU HEARD OVAL?
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:16 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark
game of pricks is only a "completely unremarkable indie record" if you're not deeply invested in the progress of indie guitar pop over the last couple decades. and if you're not, why the fuck would you bother with pitchfork rankings on any level? indie guitar pop is what they do - it's the absolute core of their aesthetic, their ethos to the extent they have one. and if you are invested in the history of that particular musical niche, then game of pricks is anything but unremarkable. it's crucial (though, yeah, you could and probably would quibble about which GBV track, alien lanes vs bee thousand, etc).
i.e., this kind of complaint seems so totally ass-backwards, given that it's a fucking pitchfork list.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
t always looks a little cloying when experimental stuff shows up in track countdowns. Because it sort of says, "Yeah, 'Make Em Say Uhhh' was a classic single and all, BUT HAVE YOU HEARD OVAL?
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, September 2, 2010 2:50 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
this is only true if the list in question treats the experimental tracks as token curiosities. if a legit interest in experimental music is part of your basic POV, then it doesn't seem weird at all.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
game of pricks is only a "completely unremarkable indie record" if you're not deeply invested in the progress of indie guitar pop over the last couple decades.
well, i haven't been invested in it for a while. but i was, big time, back in the 90s. i can still grok what i liked about indie. but that song is nothing.
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
fyi, i'm a huge experimental music nerdball, and i would feel straight fuckin ridiculous trying to put Keijo Haino and Masonna and Borbetomagus up against like my 200 favorite banging pop/rap/dance/alternarock/MTV singles of the 90s.
Though I'd feel even more ridiculous putting milquetoast weiner music like "Bonnie Prince Billy" and Guided By Voices up against them
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, okay. sounded like you were airily dismissing indie rock in general, which makes no sense as a criticism of this or that track on a pitchfork list. but if it's it's more that you personally don't dig "game of pricks" or GBV in general, that's cool, matters of taste, etc.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
...like, if your rock canon has built to spill and guided by voices at the top, then ok fine. but then why does your rap canon have biggie and wu-tang instead of like...company flow or black moon or something? [2nd paragraph lifted from a subsequent ciderpress post]
― ciderpress, Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:35 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark
don't think that one's interest in indie rock necessarily demands an across the board indie-is-the-best stance. though it's in flux, somewhat novel, and thus somewhat schizophrenic, p4k's current emphasis on mainstream rap and cult dance stuff seems pretty natural. remember their supporting acts like cannibal ox and aesop rock way back when though... did any of those tracks place?
― max, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:26 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i knew there was a reason i clicked on this thread
― horseshoe, Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
borbetomagus was the most insane live thing i ever saw, just hellish and amazing
― i got what t.rex turok the mic right (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
i would feel straight fuckin ridiculous trying to put Keijo Haino and Masonna and Borbetomagus up against like my 200 favorite banging pop/rap/dance/alternarock/MTV singles of the 90s.
i don't get this, whiney. why would that feel so ridiculous? i mean, i put shit & shine's "toilet door tits" as my single favorite track on some recent best-of-the-decade poll, along with all kinds of pop/rap/etc stuff. and other noise/weirdo stuff, too. is it my honest-to-god favorite song of the decade? fuck, i dunno. but i love it to death, love it every bit as much as "hey ya" or "my hood" or whatever. just in a different way. why should i let the fact that some of the things i love are unpopular marginalize them even further when i'm expressing my own individual taste?
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)
No, but basically putting that on any ballot would be essentially throwing a vote away.
The point being that pop/rap/rock hits are things that we share via radio, MTV, mssg boards, blogs; and indie-rock songs like "Summer Babe" are similar in that they are usually shared on a smaller level—plus they build up legends, are passed around AS songs. You get down to expirimental music circles and—save the occassional Lightning Bolt song--it's almost impossible to find a consensus on ANYTHING since the music is tailored to individual tastes and ppl generally listen to albums instead of songs. Like get 100 casual-to-rabid Devo fans in a room and ask their favorite song vs get 100 casual-to-rabid Sightings fans in a room, and you're gonna have a lot harder time managing that second group.
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)
Like it or not, there's a canon of 90s indie rock songs that Pitchfork can embrace or neglect, but it exists. Like name me five experimental music tracks from the 90s (non-IDM) that you would call "canonic"
Like Harry Pussy's "Pussy Control"?
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
that's an interesting point. not sure it's true, but it's interesting nonetheless. i've tended to think that there's "pop" in almost every genre and stripe of music, barring only the most extreme forms of noise & experimental music. by pop i mean qualities that enable shared appreciation among those who dig that genre. or elements that reach out of genre confines to more conventional/common appreciations, and that can thus unify fans. but maybe not.
like the devo fans analogy seems off, somehow. you get 100 people who maybe kinda like devo or have heard some devo, and you're gonna come to a quick consensus on the hits. but you get rabid fans in the room, and they're gonna be repping for shit like "gates of steel", "penetration in the centerfold", "be stiff", "wiggly world". they're gonna argue the minutia of live tracks and b-sides, some weirdo's gonna claim that "words get stick in my throat" deserves serious consideration.
just by treating "indie" indie as magnetic north, pitchfork steps aside from the idea that quality is what we share, into the idea that quality is what differentiates us. i'm not arguing that indie music is of higher or special quality, note, just that it's predicated to some extent on its supposed separation from a more thoroughly shared & sharable mainstream. and maybe it is harder to come to a consensus on like sightings or keiji haino tracks, but metal, punk and world music (for instance) have a unifying power that's similar to rap & dance music, at least among fans.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
Like name me five experimental music tracks from the 90s (non-IDM) that you would call "canonic"
well, i'm not really hooked into that scene. certainly wasn't in the 90s. imagine that the people at the wire could bang something together though. or that you could just by indexing the references in their reviews for a year or two.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
two people at the wire would have vastly different opinions, is what i'm saying
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
There's no "Summer Babe" of noise, dogg
xpost Super Shine!
― Davek (davek_00), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
i don't even think 'summer babe' is in the top 25% of pavement songs tbh
― ciderpress, Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
Not the hugest noise person, but I'm sure there is some Merzbow or Dead C/Gate or whatever equivalent to "Summer Babe" that plenty of noise fans agree on.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
Goddamn I am so sick of all this Pavement love! If anything, they deserve the term 'milquetoast weiner music' above any indie fuxxor!
― Davek (davek_00), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
^^^
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)
great guys, really interesting
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)
feel it's more intense among people who weren't 'around' back then. and americans.
― i am legernd (history mayne), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)
i'd argue that one of the reasons that it's hard for me (as a generalist type music fan with a pronounced taste for noisy psychedelic shit) to cough up the canonical experimental music tracks from the 90s is that mainstream critics haven't done the job of building this canon for me. they haven't done it either cuz they aren't tuned in, or cuz no one's demanding it - probably both. in the same way that tracks by basinski, fennesz & gas/voight have become canonical in the last decade, however, i'm sure that there's stuff that equally well represents the 90s. as pieces by cage, oliveros, subotnik, reich, lucier and stockhausen did in the mid-20th century. and pieces by laurie anderson, negativland, einsturzende neubauten and john oswald (etc.) did in the 80s.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:00 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ those reference points cobbled together with full awareness of my own ignorance in these matters
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)
It's just that they're as guilty for Crimes Against Interesting Music as all the 00s-middlebrow-consensus-indie Whiney loves to bash.
But one thing, I appreciate them in a 'conceptual' sense if not a musical one, to their credit. Would definitely listen to Prog-with-in-jokes.
― Davek (davek_00), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)
I was pretty pleased that a Grifters song got a -see also- next to Arches of Loaf - 'Web In Front'. I believe Arches of Loaf is a more popular band and 'Web in Front' is not as good as 'She Blows Blasts of Static' (Agree/Disagree?). This would be just one case in which a more popular band won but I have to give Pitchfork credit for knowing about The Grifters (someone must be reading ILX)
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)
Grifters ain't that obscure, dude.
― no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)
lol at guy breaking up an actually intriguing ilm discussion with "Pavement sux. fukk those guys."
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)
xp they might not be so obscure but many bands I like a lot seem to be obscure to Pitchfork Lists
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:27 (fifteen years ago)
for instance, should a song from one of the 90's Thingy or Heavy Vegetable albums make the list? hell yeah. Will it? hell no
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)
The point being that pop/rap/rock hits are things that we share via radio, MTV, mssg boards, blogs; and indie-rock songs like "Summer Babe" are similar in that they are usually shared on a smaller level—plus they build up legends, are passed around AS songs. You get down to expirimental music circles and—save the occassional Lightning Bolt song--it's almost impossible to find a consensus on ANYTHING since the music is tailored to individual tastes and ppl generally listen to albums instead of songs.
Totally with this, except that the process that Perpetua described seems like it would have been totally conducive to picking consensus experimental tracks, if they'd wanted to go in that direction.
Also, the rap/dance/indie rock combination contenderizer mentioned earlier has pretty clear precedents--like SPIN Magazine and MTV. Perhaps that's just where the money/audience is.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe I will listen to my Heavy Vegetable records tonight, hmm.
― no gut busting joke can change history (polyphonic), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, i get that. but i suspect that if you got like 50 people who regularly write for the wire to submit lists of the most important experimental pieces of the 90s, a canon of some sort would quickly emerge. moreover, that the population of this canon wouldn't come as any great surprise to most of the critics submitting lists. i suspect that something like this is already present in the way they think and talk with one another about the music they enjoy.
agree, fwiw, that experimental music is an umbrella for a bunch of (often unconnected) exploratory niches, each with its own unique aesthetics and points of reference, and that this does differentiate it as a field from, say, chart pop, which is widely shared by nature. but among the critics who are passionate about experimental music in a broad/general way, i'd be really surprised to learn that there isn't already a commonly understood and widely agreed-upon core set of "important" artists and works that speaks for the 1990s.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)
I agree with contenderizer on the basic principle, but in the context of a singles/tracks poll I'd never expect something like Derek Bailey or Matthew Shipp to chart.
Wire end-of-year charts from the 90s are up on http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/charts/?p=2 by the way, definitely some overlap with the Pitchfork list.
― seandalai, Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:52 (fifteen years ago)
xpp personally I prefer Thingy's Songs About Angels, Evil, and Running Around on Fire (1997) more than any Heavy Vegetable album but I'm glad that I may have inspired you to listen to them tonight :)
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 2 September 2010 23:53 (fifteen years ago)
Though I guess if it was a Wire chart you'd get Coil at #1.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)
hipinion thread on this is hilarious/bonkerssome bitter azz dudes on there -- the list could be anything & dudes would have a problem with it
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)
"And honestly not charting Hootie is retarded. "I Only Wanna Be With You" was one of the biggest hits of all time. All time."
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:10 (fifteen years ago)
guess who wrote that
Hootie?
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
tuomas?
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)
pitchfork gets judged more than others because it's omnipresent
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)
and they have more 'best of' lists than you can shake a stick at
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)
omnipresent like the beatles.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 3 September 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)
That's one half of it at least; another half is that we care about Pitchfork in a way that I don't think we do about Rolling Stone or NME, it's part of the information universe with which we associate ourselves. When they screw up we complain because they could conceivably have done better.
And those that don't buy into this just like trolling those who do.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)
but in the context of a singles/tracks poll I'd never expect something like Derek Bailey or Matthew Shipp to chart.
yeah, i guess just the word "singles" tilts things towards pop - or pop attempts, at least. and i know that experimental music isn't a big part of pitchfork's purview. i'm not faulting them for failing to represent it in their lists. (their abandonment of metal is, to me, more disappointing, but i understand that their tastes aren't mine. no biggie.) still, i question the idea that this division is somehow inevitable, and if so, what makes it so.
there's been a trend in generalist music criticism over the past decade or two to prioritize pop and its paradigms over rock, which had assumed calcified dominance over critical perspectives. that's all to the good, but it's engendered the attitude that the most popular (or, oddly, pop-like) things are and, crucially, should be the natural center of critical attention. thus not only chart pop, but dance and electronic music that is, in some cases, relatively obscure. as a result of this shift, you see pitchfork beginning to split the difference between the pop-leaning indie rock that's been their bread & butter since day one and a "greatest hits" approach to rap and dance music. or something that splits the dif between a greatest hits approach and a more selective crit/nerd canon. i see that this has happened and have my own ideas about why it's happened: it seems natural to me on that level.
it'd still be interesting to see a parallel canon of "important" experimental music hashed out and popularized by semi-mainstream critics, one that isn't assigned stepchild status relative to pop bangers. it doesn't seem ridiculous to me to think that pitchfork or NPR might drive such an evaluation and popularization, or that their audience might be interested in it - not that they have any obligation to do this, of course. i dunno, it probably sounds like i'm stuck on some old-fashioned/elitist mindset where art of "real importance" can somehow be separated from the popular dross. honestly, that's not where i'm coming from. i just like it when critics make it their job to champion oddball enthusiasms, underdogs and non-consensus aesthetics. i like it when they get together in gangs to foist these kinds of argumentative (and often elitist) perspectives on the world at large. that, to me, is a big part of what makes music criticism eye-opening, challenging, worth reading.
hope this doesn't come across as complaining. i'm not complaining, just thinkin baot things.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
"Maybe Rob knows and won't tell me."
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)
in the same way that tracks by basinski, fennesz & gas/voight have become canonical in the last decade, however, i'm sure that there's stuff that equally well represents the 90s.
i mean even then, anyone who says there's a canonical SONG by any one of these artists is totally talking out of their ass. I agree with contenderizer re: an experimental canon would be interesting. But it's actually kind of part of the fun that there isn't
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)
it's like the one thing the internet hasn't totally fucking ruined yet
― miccio kurihara (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)
"i only wanna be with you" is not even the best hootie song imo
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)
challop 2 end all challops
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 01:11 (fifteen years ago)
i wasn't aware that they had other songs
hootie and the blowpoll : best hootie singlez
you should make that thread max
― / (The Brainwasher), Friday, 3 September 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)
well, with fennesz you have "endless summer", and maybe you could say "dlp4" for basinski (?), but point taken. as i obliquely suggested above, i wonder whether the hesitancy to advance such a canon is anti-rockist fallout. like, after the dismantling of rock's claim to dominance - and more importantly, after the dismantling of the value-determining paradigms that elevated rock over pop - maybe it's now difficult to articulate and generate broad support for non-populist critical perspectives.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 01:28 (fifteen years ago)
I had no idea this list was even happening until now and feel better off for it.
― skip, Friday, 3 September 2010 01:48 (fifteen years ago)
That's one half of it at least; another half is that we care about Pitchfork in a way that I don't think we do about Rolling Stone or NME, it's part of the information universe with which we associate ourselves. When they screw up we complain because they could conceivably have done better.And those that don't buy into this just like trolling those who do.― seandalai,
And those that don't buy into this just like trolling those who do.― seandalai,
I don't fall into the category of caring about pitchfork but I don't feel like I'm a troll because I occasionally judge them harshly. People saying a movie is bad in a thread for that movie aren't necessarily trolls in the some way. I guess Trolling would be saying "you suck because you like _______". That's not the same as saying "I don't like ________".
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 01:51 (fifteen years ago)
― / (The Brainwasher), Thursday, September 2, 2010 9:12 PM (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
helloooooo, 'let her cry'
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 02:03 (fifteen years ago)
max otm
― balls, Friday, 3 September 2010 02:09 (fifteen years ago)
Blues Traveler stomps all over Hootie
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 02:10 (fifteen years ago)
^ racist
― balls, Friday, 3 September 2010 02:14 (fifteen years ago)
which one has the black guy
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)
they went with *we are the pigs* as the best Suede song of the *decade*!?
― piscesx, Friday, 3 September 2010 03:16 (fifteen years ago)
20-1 is in. some unexpected choices!
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:03 (fifteen years ago)
No Talk Talk, but Aaliyah, Pulp and Mazzy Star.
― MarkoP, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:04 (fifteen years ago)
7. Neutral Milk Hotelthat band makes me shit vomit
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:08 (fifteen years ago)
I like that album, but I wouldn't have picked Holland 1945. Glad they went with MBV's Only Shallow
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:10 (fifteen years ago)
so did U2, Coldplay and The Goo Goo Dolls really not get any shutouts on the entire list? interesting
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)
U2 had a shout out in the see also for "Stay (So Far So Close)" on the Brian Eno/John Cale song.
― MarkoP, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)
Good:
Mazzy Star -- not sure they belong at #19 but glad they are represented someplace.OutKast at #16DEPECHE MODE YESSSSSAaliyah at #8 -- nice placing, huh?
Bad:
Notorious BIG -- dude is top ten material, maybe if he switched places with Pavement it would all make sense?Pavement at #1 -- Gold Soundzzzzzzzzz......zzzz................ *snooze*Pulp at #2 -- I like these guys but I mean, really? This high?? LOL ANGLOPHILIA
Ugly:
Nirvana at #13 vs. Weezer at #10 -- LOL REVISIONIST INDIE HISTORYNeutral Milk Hotel -- no mention of their far-superior (and much forgotten) first album.
Talk Talk -- missing?Madonna? (surely she placed and I'm forgetting, right?)TLC?What else is left out??
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)
that's a really good Top 20.
― Bee OK, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:16 (fifteen years ago)
U2 deserves its own entry in the top 200, btw. Zooropa, Pop, Achtung Baby, all great albums.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:17 (fifteen years ago)
TLC placed higher up with Creep. No Madonna?
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
wait there is U2 but no Sublime or Red Hot Chili Peppers
I'm happy that the list gave shout-outs to Sloan, The Sea and Cake and Nada Surf
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:22 (fifteen years ago)
lol gold soundz. it's not even in the top 20 pavement songs let alone the best track of the decade.
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:22 (fifteen years ago)
TLC's Creep was there at 114.
I remember seeing Ray of Light somewhere in the See Also section.
No Talk Talk though. but maybe they felt they were were more of an album band or that most of their innovation had was in the 80s with Spirit of Eden.
― MarkoP, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
#1 will be, like, "Summer Babe"― markers, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:16 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink#2 will be "Paranoid Android"― markers, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:16 AM (2 days ago)
― markers, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:16 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― markers, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:16 AM (2 days ago)
alright, so we got "Gold Soundz" @ #1 & "PA" @ #4
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
I'm proud to be the first one to mention Talk Talk on this thread for some odd reason
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
It was 11 I think on their albums list, but yeah I can see not picking out one track from it...
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:31 (fifteen years ago)
I'm also surprised at Juicy for Biggie and Outkast's Spottieottiedopalicious as choices
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
(I don't consciously remember any of their albums list)
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
All of the artists in the top 40 on that list except Talk Talk, I think, are included here
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:38 (fifteen years ago)
i love the fact that Pulp came in second, totally deserving and really surprising to me. Pulp just seem more of a British/NME thing, so for Pitchfork to give it that good of placement is sort of cool.
Pavement, Radiohead, My Bloody Valentine, Neutral Milk Hotel and Beck are Top 10 indie = makes sense but Nirvana got robbed.
― Bee OK, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:44 (fifteen years ago)
we got "Gold Soundz" @ #1
huh
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
A hiphop #1 would've been way cooler.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
i couldn't sing appx 9 of these 20 songs if you held a gun to my head
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
Like seriously.. "Protect Ya Neck" would've been a perfect #1.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
ugh, Neutral Milk Hotel in the top 10 + Pavement at #1 sort of spoils all the fun of the list for me. Shoulda known.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:47 (fifteen years ago)
"Holland 1945" is really good though..
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:47 (fifteen years ago)
Oh.. well I know all 20.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
pitsfork ha.
uh, seems both solid and honestly representative of their brand as it currently stands. personally bummed to see sonic youth top out at #60 with 100%. it's a good song, but hardly the best thing they did in the 90s (see: kool thing, mote, bull in the heather, the diamond sea and hits of sunshine, just to start with). cruelly understates the shadow they cast over that decade, imo. that oasis and neutral milk hotel are given SO much more credit kinda lays me low.
the diminution of sonic youth is paralleled by the fact that there's zero representation for the rock/punk/metal/psych garbage that's most near & dear to me. i wouldn't have expected to see much of it, but the most obvious omissions include things like the jesus lizard, shellac, boredoms, brainiac, RFTC, skullflower and polvo. no matter how you slice it, a pretty thorough repudiation of the strains of indie rock that i actually give a shit about. but i never turned to pitchfork for that kind of support in the first place, so no surprise. maybe these bands & artists, like the experimental stuff whiney was talking about, belong more to albums than tracks? dunno...
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
man with the exception of stupid ol pavement i fuck with every song on that list
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
the top 20 i mean
jesus lizard and boredoms were both on the list iirc
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
There was a typo.. #1 was actually Sleep "Dopesmoker"
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, sorry about the tired/boozy lack of clarity. in my head, i was talking about the top 100, though i didn't actually say that anywhere.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
it's a good song, but hardly the best thing they did in the 90s (see: kool thing, mote, bull in the heather, the diamond sea and hits of sunshine, just to start with).
There's too much of that going on with this list ... picking the "underappreciated" song instead of the more obvious hit. "Say it Ain't So?" "Only Shallow?"
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
Only Shallow kickstarted that album in the most shocking possible way. Great choice I think...
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not gonna go through this, is there literally one metal song? And it's Danzig?
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
The most glaring omission was "Let The Rhythm Hit Em."
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
ban all pitchfork writes from this board for allowing biggie to place outside of the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah no metal wtf.. Where's "Holy Wars???"
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
at least aaliyah made it into the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm way more tired of "Say It Ain't So" and "Loser" than "Gold Soundz". Those two songs are still being overplayed on the radio.
― her lover who appeared to come from her behind on a car (KMS), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
like seriously not even being a pedantic "wot u don't listen to carcass" troll about it, but like
what's up dudeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBfygUiS50g&ob=av2e
not much yallhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESjyB8EMw4w
can i play too?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkFqg5wAuFk
can i justhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rloidlFbi4w
i meanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaysTVcounI
but then alsohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPNFVj-pISU
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
it's not exactly like theres some shortage of metal that crossed over into the alternasphere in the 90s
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY3LAFJbKyY
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
(a song I don't even really like that much)
I'd have to check, but it's probably the worst song on the black album
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
That's cool, but Holy Wars is a better song than all of those..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4OPQBNXdfc
and..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPUe1nv4gIk&ob
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfZMXR-a6fg
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
goodnight little dudehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hglVqACd1C8
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALPH86ybA6U
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:27 (fifteen years ago)
I like that melvins track. body count too
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
but yeah, even the most indiest, most p4k friendly strains of hard/heavy/noisy music got short shrift. (billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?) like not only is indie streamlined into its least confrontational, most comforting strains, the slack is taken up by expansion into pop genres that are heavily covered and well-represented everywhere.
i am one of these people who will find something to pout about no matter what.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
if this stuff is really annoying to you (any of you), and barely covers the music you are genuinely interested in, then why bother paying attention to pitchfork?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:32 (fifteen years ago)
billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?
That was Whiney.. I was bummed out by no Megadeth or Slayer or Eric B & Rakim.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:34 (fifteen years ago)
i think you just broke the code
xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:36 (fifteen years ago)
it's a sincere question. it wasn't meant as a "won't you just stfu about pitchfork already" post
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:37 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know. in part because it (pitchfork) so dominates the discourse, and i'm interested not just in music, but in the conversation about music. by that i don't just mean talking about music w my friends, which i do all the time, but the way that cultural "tastemakers" process the idea of music. and ilm is big part of my connection to that ongoing critical dialogue about music. therefore, what ilm talks about, i pay attention to. therefore, pitchfork. and beyond that, i can't pretend that i'm not indie at heart. a big part of my sense of what music is and can mean was formed in the mid 80s by bands like the replacements, husker du, sonic youth, big black, butthole surfers, etc. gotta be true to my roots.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:39 (fifteen years ago)
nicely done.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think it also goes back to what seandalai said upthread, that we care about Pitchfork in a way that we don't necessarily about Rolling Stone or NME, "it's part of the information universe with which we associate ourselves. When they screw up we complain because they could conceivably have done better."
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:41 (fifteen years ago)
so you feel that pitchfork represents your taste - or should represent your tastes?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:42 (fifteen years ago)
yes to some extent, for me, at least more than other review sites except maybe the wire
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
no. maybe i'm misstating (by habitual rhetorical overkill) the idea that any of this is really annoying to me. it isn't. not at all. i think the pitchfork list is cool for what it is, and don't really care about it anyway. i guess what i'm operating from is a sense that "my music" - the fucked-up, bloody-knuckled strain of indie rock that i've always been most in love with - has become increasingly marginal and even moribund. this makes me feel old and grumpy.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
Another glaring omission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gUFO9vRH_A
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
marginal to what, what pitchfork covers? i mean, it isn't like pitchfork is the cable company that has a local/regional monopoly. you can find music criticism in other places.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
lol at galling lack of cannibal corpse
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think any of us knows ALL the writers at Pitchfork, but most of us know a few (and it's a different few for everyone), so there's definitely an interest that goes beyond just that of the normal reader. When they, as a collective, fuck up a list in a very little or a very big way, it's kind of like we're slinking around at the back of the bar, laughing with the rest of your friends about how your one other mutual friend is totally blowing it onstage doing a karaoke version of "Total Eclipse of the Heart."
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
or is this just one of those threads where people complain about the results of some poll, the way grumpy old people complain how expensive everything is nowadays - because it is a way of bonding with others?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
I think what it comes down to, for myself at least, is that Pitchfork is understood to be a tastemaker and canon builder, and that lists like this represent the construction of the 90s canon (for example). People are annoyed or pissed that Pitchfork--for, pick you favorite indie-baiting reason--edited their favorites out of the canon.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
the 90s canon for a particular affinity group, it isn't creating _the_ canon
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
i think it comes down to this
if you care about music crit you care about pitchfork & their lists & what they review & how they review it & what score it gets
if you don't care about music crit you likely don't care about any of those things
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
Well of course, but this is ILM--isn't is understood that the "particular affinity group" of Pitchfork is going to have a vast overlap with the "particular affinity group" of ILM?
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:50 (fifteen years ago)
I just think it's fun.. isn't that enough?
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:50 (fifteen years ago)
i'm pretty sure i'm otm and we can move on
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:51 (fifteen years ago)
fuckin guy
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:51 (fifteen years ago)
i care somewhat about music crit, but i don't really care about most of the music pitchfork covers - and most of that is bands/records from my youth, and i don't really care about whether this or that major/large indie label record or song by a band of people i don't know personally makes some website's top 200 of a previous decade.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:52 (fifteen years ago)
re, sarah: oh yeah, i know. again, i'm not really saying that pitchfork would better if it were different, or raging about the fact that the shit i'm interested in doesn't get adequate coverage. though they're so occasional as to seem dead, termbo do a decent job at hitting like 25% of it, and mosurak/still single bats clean-up for like half of the rest. if i were truly madly deeply serious about the remainder, i'd be reading the wire, decibel and other forums more regularly. but i'm not, and maybe i'm just trying to steer discussion here towards a corner of the indie universe that doesn't get much attention, even on ilm. like how many people post in rolling punk or les rallizes denudes threads?
this is my revenge.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
So I guess the question becomes this: we're all enjoying ourselves to varying degrees for various reasons--why are YOU on this thread afaik xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
sarahel is playing the morbs role iirc -- but with more sanity of course
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:54 (fifteen years ago)
contenderizer: dusted is pretty solid
z_b: curiosity? maybe unhealthy? idk
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:55 (fifteen years ago)
i think you, sarah, are distinctly and perhaps (close to) uniquely outside the venn diagram, relative to most of the regular p4k thread coffee klatch/bitch fest. i mean, you are just not sufficiently indie.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:56 (fifteen years ago)
no offense...
imidswtpitbh
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
lol - i am insufficiently indie it is true! thank you all for sincerely answering my sincere questions. i feel like i have learned something v important about ilx tonight.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
yah, for real! dusted is where i get most of my irl music pointers. or those that don't come from ilm, anyway...
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
― sarahel, Friday, September 3, 2010 2:32 AM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i think sometimes people pay a lot of attention to stuff that annoys them! not even by choice. like the nyt style section annoys me to no end but i read it every week. twice.
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
i feel like i have learned something v important about ilx tonight.
what, that it is crazy indie fuxxors? cuz...
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:59 (fifteen years ago)
sarahel, if you don't mind me asking, what is your "affinity group"?
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:02 (fifteen years ago)
wish list included big l, big pun, and ween
― symsymsym, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
noize iirc xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
yeh, it is the undiscovered country
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)
who is spock in this scenario
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:12 (fifteen years ago)
@contenderizer
― Dan S, Friday, September 3, 2010 5:58 AM
I believe shellac and polvo were there also
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:13 (fifteen years ago)
were they? i miss so much...
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:17 (fifteen years ago)
again, was primarily concerning myself with teh all important/coveted top 100 slots
wow. im really really surprised by these results
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:22 (fifteen years ago)
also, fuck weezer forever
god i hate that band
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:23 (fifteen years ago)
i took this to heart last time people said it to me, when i bitched about pfork on the EOY lists, and i'm proud that i basically managed to completely ignore this list while it was happening. sarahel is right here, really. it's important to remember that this is NOT any sort of definitive or central canon, unless you associate yourself with a particular niche group of music fans. which i, obviously, do not.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:29 (fifteen years ago)
but god wants me to love gold sounds
― false prophets talk in metaphors (CaptainLorax), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:33 (fifteen years ago)
this is a weird-azz top 20 str8 up
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:36 (fifteen years ago)
it is a house divided against itself
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
i dont think its that weird, its pretty good, i like loser, and weezer, and all the bands lex hates, and i like a lot of the musicians he loves too, seems to me that if you made a cd with all these songs i would play it all the way through, probably even the pavement song
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
what about mazzy star
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
fuck yeah
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:43 (fifteen years ago)
i like pretty much every song i've heard out of these 20, exceptions being NMH & radiohead
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:43 (fifteen years ago)
the mazzy star trk is probably the only choice in the top 20 that didn't have me wondering why they chose that track from the particular artist
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:43 (fifteen years ago)
i have made out to that song too many times not to have feelings about it
i thought the choices in the top 20 were less bizarre than the rest of the list
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:44 (fifteen years ago)
only "protect ya neck" through me off
i don't really know tons about like mbv tho or something, maybe that one was a weird pick
threw*
i probably would've picked "ATLiens" or "rosa parks" for outkast but i'm not about to quibble w/ someone thinking "spottieottie" is that good
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:45 (fifteen years ago)
there's an old ilm post somewhere which basically says "mbv = enya with layered guitars instead of layered vox", and it's otm.
björk songs from the '90s that are way way way better than "hyperballad": human behaviour, come to me, aeroplane, play dead, big time sensuality, one day, enjoy, isobel, the modern things, bachelorette, jóga, pluto, hunter, unravel, all is full of love, my snare, sod off
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:51 (fifteen years ago)
actually i also way prefer the awesome brodsky quartet version of "hyperballad" to the original
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfhkZXZZVcg
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:52 (fifteen years ago)
"How can you delude yourself for this long?"
Board description? Please?
― symsymsym, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:53 (fifteen years ago)
man I was sure the #1 spot belonged to me this time, wtf, had booked a table at le bernardin
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:54 (fifteen years ago)
easy to say, but ignores that how you layer is at least as important as that/what you layer
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:55 (fifteen years ago)
also ignores the fact that enya with layered guitars is rad
― just sayin, Friday, 3 September 2010 07:57 (fifteen years ago)
feel free to explain enya's layering in detail! i have only ever given a cursory listen to both acts and neither grabbed me, and it sounded pretty accurate from that.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:58 (fifteen years ago)
i'm saying that yes, both consist of the layering of a given element and strive for/arrive at a soft, enveloping effect - but beyond that there isn't much similarity. enya's layering has less to do with textural contrasts and manufactured disorientation, doesn't run sharp/harsh tones into softer ones or try to generate soft sounds out of intermingled harshness. otoh, they both do wind up working in a similar way, so i understand the comparison.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 08:05 (fifteen years ago)
lol at Pavement taking #1
― Moka, Friday, 3 September 2010 08:41 (fifteen years ago)
totes mediokes imo
― i am legernd (history mayne), Friday, 3 September 2010 08:48 (fifteen years ago)
Trip-hop was already plenty cinematic by 1996, when DJ Shadow dropped his stunning debut LP Entroducing.... His contribution to the scene was to focus on the small stuff. Shadow dropped the world-weary narratives associated with the genre and zoomed all the way in, creating richly detailed atmospheres out of samples that felt less like film scenes and more like a master painter's collected work.
feel like this cat is bluffing most of the time. a bit like the blur thing earlier, it seems weird to me to talk about shad's 'contribution to the scene', as if he didn't help build the fuckin thing. i guess massive attack had 'world-weary narratives' but a lot of trip-hop followed in shadow's footsteps -- was instrumental hip-hop. whether his atmospheres are less filmy than painter-y, idk.
― i am legernd (history mayne), Friday, 3 September 2010 09:00 (fifteen years ago)
eh i didnt say it was a BAD top 20 i said it was a weird one. rlly shocked nirvana in particular didnt make top ten, and lost out to, well, weezer
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork's review section is pretty broad-minded - in the past two weeks they've reviewed Kemialliset Ystävät, Oren Ambarchi/Keiji Haino/Jim O'Rourke and Fennesz/Daniell/Buck amongst other non-fuxxor releases - but this isn't reflected in their charts or in the canonical history adopted by the site. As has been observed, one factor is that the intersection of the reviewers' tastes is presumably indiecentric and any consensus work will reflect this. Another factor I think is that their historical perspective (what they cover in terms of reissues/retrospectives) is a lot more limited.
But yeah, it's not as if Pitchfork=the critical universe. Their reviews don't have much influence on my purchases (unlike say 10 years ago) but I check it mostly to see what people are buzzing on.
xp - Weezer > Nirvana is a classic result.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
this list is so hilariously challoping at every level
― call all destroyer, Friday, 3 September 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
except of course that afaik its basically about counting up ppls votes
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
if in order to make it interesting you need to do things like say gold soundz is the best pavement song; maybe you shouldn't have made the list at all
― call all destroyer, Friday, 3 September 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
then a group of ppl were challoping with their votes--don't see why that wouldn't follow
― call all destroyer, Friday, 3 September 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
I thought it might be interesting to compare the Pitchfork poll with the results of ILX's 1990s singles poll. So here's the Pitchfork top 50, and I've put the song's placing in the ILX poll in brackets:
50. Oasis - Live Forever [#73]49. Yo La Tengo - Autumn Sweater [-]48. Foo Fighters - Everlong [-]47. PJ Harvey - Rid of Me [-]46. Stardust - Music Sounds Better with You [#16]45. Geto Boys - Mind Playing Tricks on Me [#5]44. Massive Attack - Unfinished Symphony [#15]43. The Chemical Brothers - Setting Sun [-]42. Nine Inch Nails - Closer [-]41. The Pharcyde - Passin' Me By [-]40. The Orb - Little Fluffy Clouds [#43]39. Beastie Boys - Sabotage [-]38. A Tribe Called Quest - Check the Rhime [-]37. Sinead O'Connor - Nothing Compares 2 U [#17]36. Guided by Voices - Game of Pricks [-]35. Pete Rock & C.L. Smooth - They Reminisce Over You (T.R.O.Y.) [#65]34. New Order - Regret [#6]33. Missy Elliott - The Rain (Supa Dupa Fly) [#62]32. Bonnie "Prince" Billy - I See a Darkness [-]31. Underworld - Born Slippy NUXX [#28]30. The Flaming Lips - Race for the Prize [-]29. The Verve - Bitter Sweet Symphony [-]28. Nas - It Ain't Hard to Tell [-]27. Elliott Smith - Needle in the Hay [-]26. Blur - Girls & Boys [-]25. Mobb Deep - Shook Ones Pt. II [#51]24. Built to Spill - Car [-]23. Spiritualized - Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space (Elvis Version) [-]22. The Breeders - Cannonball [#3]21. The Smashing Pumpkins - 1979 [-]20. DJ Shadow - Midnight in a Perfect World [-]19. Mazzy Star - Fade into You [#49]18. Daft Punk - Da Funk [#23]17. Belle & Sebastian - The State I'm In [#21]16. Outkast - Spottieottiedopalicious [-]15. Depeche Mode - Enjoy the Silence [#24]14. The Notorious B.I.G. - Juicy [#35]13. Nirvana - Smells Like Teens Spirit [#12]12. Aphex Twin - Windowlicker [#8]11. Björk - Hyperballad [#10]10. Weezer - Say It Ain't So [-]9. Beck - Loser [#14]8. Aaliyah - Are You That Somebody? [#13]7. Neutral Milk Hotel - Holland, 1945 [-]6. My Bloody Valentine - Only Shallow [-]5. Wu-Tang Clan - Protect Ya Neck [-]4. Radiohead - Paranoid Android [#9]3. Dr. Dre feat. Snoop Doggy Dogg - Nuthin' But a 'G' Thang [#18]2. Pulp - Common People [#1]1. Pavement - Gold Soundz [-]
8 songs in the Pitchfork top 20 also made it to the ILX top 20. 7 songs in the Pitchfork top 20 didn't place at all in the ILX top 100, though My Bloody Valentine, Wu-Tang Clan, and Pavement all had other songs place in the ILX poll. Oddly enough Outkast had no songs in the ILX top 100.
― Tuomas, Friday, 3 September 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
were there any denim tracks in the top 200? i didn't see one.
― i am legernd (history mayne), Friday, 3 September 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
Boo, those whores.
― (¬_¬) (Nicole), Friday, 3 September 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
That looks exactly the way Pitchfork's Top 20 Songs of the 1990s should look.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
okay I'd never heard that Pavement song before and is just not made for me
no real opinion* on the rest of the top 20; most of it is awesome, some of it I never, ever want to hear again, pretty much all of it "deserves" to be there
* okay, more like "really obvious opinions"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
Couldn't help but notice that "I Can't Dance" by Genesis didn't make any list, so I question the validity of the results.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
Nothing from Dance into the Light either.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
Really this is just as hilarious as it was last night when I first saw the list. I mean, if you just took Pavement down from #1 and swapped their entry with Biggie (#14), Nirvana (#13), Bjork (#11), MBV (#6) or Wu-Tang (#5), I think the top 20 would make a hell of a lot more sense. Pavement deserves to be in the top 20. All of those other folks would make fantastic #1 picks. But really, "Gold Soundz" is #1 of the decade?? O_O
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
no 'vogue'
― the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
I still don't remember, was there any Madonna at all??
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)
"Ray of Light" as a See Also pick?
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
no xpost
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
hahahaha i'm not even bothered about this list so these ridiculous omissions are just funny to me. smh
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
RIP polls
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
existence needs a hide polls option that we can turn on for as long as we need to
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
it's not surprising that Pavement is #1 on this list, and for Pitchfork, having Pavement there makes sense. although the song choice is, of course, debatable
mass debatable
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
Really and truly, though, I think U2 deserved an entry -- "One," "Mysterious Ways," "The Fly," "Stay (Faraway, So Close)," "Numb," "Staring at the Sun," "Please" -- all are light years better than anything Pavement ever did.
Was that Passengers album from 1990? If so, add "Your Blue Room" and "Miss Sarajevo" to the above list...
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
Are there really people out there who think Gold Soundz is the best pavement song?
has crooked rain ever been polled on ilx?
― peter in montreal, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)
don't like all of these u2 tracks but that effing glam rock batman one pisses over the whole pavement catalogue so... yeah basically
― i am legernd (history mayne), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
"Ultraviolet", "So Cruel"?
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
i am beginning to understand the "lol [insert nationality]" mindset ilm has devolved to over the last few years.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)
First reaction: *smh*... ;)
Really though, I'm surprised that given the wealth of Mtn G0ats love in the last 10 years, Pfork didn't find any room in the 101-200 range for "Cubs in Five," "Going to Georgia," or something along those lines.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
I've never heard anything by Pavement. I guess they don't make dance or rap or techno or any other type of good music?
― Tuomas, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
stfu moron
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
they're rap
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
I'm listening to "Gold Soundz" now... It sounds kinda like Soul Asylum, but with less gift for melody. Weren't these kind of bands dime a dozen in the 90s? What makes this one so special?
― Tuomas, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's really funny pavement is at #1 - it's like p4k was all "we've really changed guys, we're trying to cover a lot more bases and acknowledge a lot of music we know we haven't really covered before.... SYKE"
at which point they dump the bucket full of pig's blood onto carrie.
― shorn_blond.avi (dayo), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
And what's with the "z"? Clearly they're not rap.
Tuomas to thread: "I wish you were many thousands of posts longer"
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
haha actually "Gold Soundz" vs. "Runaway Train" would have been a good poll too
― da croupier, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
"It sounds kinda like Soul Asylum, but with less gift for melody"
this would be A+ trolling if tuomas wasn't the kindly incontinent uncle everyone pats on the head of ilx trolls.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
New board description.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
I can still hum "Runaway Train" even though it's been 15 years since I last heard it - I doubt "Gold Soundz" would have the same quality. Basically, when you sound like a million other rock bands and your lyrics are just a bunch of forgettable metaphors, catchy melodies are the only thing that make you stand out. At least Soul Asylum had that.
― Tuomas, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
tuomas killin it itt
― i am legernd (history mayne), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
I can still hum "Runaway Train" even though it's been 15 years since I last heard it
I can still remember what it felt like when I was riding my skateboard on my belly and I ended up eating the curb, but I hope I never actually experience that again just like I hope I never hear "Runaway Train" again even though yeah I can still hum it
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
tuomas i can still sing every word to gold soundz whereas all i remember of soul asylum at this point is that dave pirner's dick drove winona ryder to shoplifting so ymmv.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not trying troll here, I'm genuinely interested if there was some special quality that made this band stand out? Because I don't here any in this song, supposedly the #1 of the decade.
― Tuomas, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
(xx-post)
There's no such thing as a #1 song of any decade. Polls apply an inappropriate model to reality so the estimates are always going to be off. Woah.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5blb-d0rSmg
― da croupier, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)
this is by far the most fun of any of the threads related to this topic today
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
I was a lot happier before I knew that Runaway Train wasn't about an actual runaway train Tuommy you fucking monster
― great British wasteman = u (DJ Mencap), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
one thing i just remembered about runaway train is seeing the video for the first time on 120 minutes sandwiched between like the rollins band and ministry's "just one fix"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
now there's the '90s for you
Frustrated, incorporated... | Yr Winona Ryders Rock
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
I'm genuinely interested if there was some special quality that made this band stand out?
yeah, there was - no one will be able to explain it to you - sorry :(
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
I was playing the above MMC video just now (JC's hat! The sad sclown!) and asked my wife if she knew who was singing. She said (not seeing the screen) "Bon Jovi?" I asked if she knew who the original artist was and she said, "Bon Jovi?"
― da croupier, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
women wanted to be with them, men wanted to be them
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
it' se-cret-cret-cret-cret
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
uh, it's
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, September 3, 2010 10:13 AM
one of those sad internet truths
― Donovan Dagnabbit (WmC), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)
"As of 2007, the album has sold almost 500,000 copies."
you know, i'm kinda surprised by this actually.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.wordcat.co.uk/articles/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/love4.jpg
― (¬_¬) (Nicole), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
"Gold Soundz" just seems like a compromised twist ending. I could actually imagine, like, "Nuthin But a G Thang" winning on a straight vote, and then the editors shuffling things around for branding or whatever.
It does suck to be so stoked about the majority of this list and then see Weezer > Nirvana. That's such a goofy move that it kinda taints the top 20 for me. I could see Nirvana as not #1, but 13??
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
Funny thing is I feel like "Summer Babe" would've been a satisfying/appropriate #1.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
Common People beaten yet again to the Number 1 spot!
― piscesx, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
I think you could put the top 20 in any randomised order without changing the proportion of people who think it's good/bad.
Gold Soundz at #1 makes a kind of sense to me because it's so obviously not the #1 song of the 90s (or of Pavement's 90s or of that one album) it makes explicit that assigning that position to any song at all is just arbitrary and ridiculous.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
Pavement's just not a superlative band, it's a poor choice. Nothing about them begs or can command canonization this absolute.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
Weezer > Nirvana
I'm not a big Nirvana fan/apologist but this is BY FAR the worst thing about the top 20.
Fucking Weezer...
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
surprised no one has heard anyone claiming Gold Soundz as Pavement's best song before. I pretty much thought that was close to consensus. It's the first song on Quarantine the Past, the lyrics are referenced all the time--maybe for a lot of people it's more like their quintessential song? the most pavement-90s song but not their best? I never really listened to them after Crooked Rain, but it would be on my shortlist
― elephant rob, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
I would have guessed Cut Your Hair was more iconic. The video for Gold Soundz was quite popular though, right?
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
No. "Cut Your Hair" was Pavement's mainstream pinnacle. The video was a Buzz Bin clip. "Gold Soundz" was shown as the opening clip on 120 Minutes two weeks in a row but was rarely if ever shown during the day. If you're going down the road of popularity, it's "Cut Your Hair" by a fucking mile.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
Surprised to hear so many of you hate "Holland, 1945." It would have made my top 3, along with "Common People."
Disappointed they chose "Paranoid Android" over "Let Down," "Gold Soundz" over "In the Mouth a Desert," and "Say It Ain't So" over "El Scorcho," but the artists and placements all seem about right.
Surprised "Smells Like Teen Spirit" isn't higher.
Surprised Robyn's "Show Me Love" didn't get a shout out considering their (deserved) love for her lately--I didn't see it in a "See also" section, but maybe I missed it.
Not surprised one bit that country and alt-country were just figments of my 90s imagination. They never happened. No Lucinda Williams, no Old 97's, no Whiskeytown, no Jayhawks, no Uncle Tupelo...
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ "Gun", "If That's Alright", "Fall Down Easy"...
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
No dEUS or Morphine seems unforgivable to me but probably not to anyone else.
― seandalai, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
i like both but my 90s list would not resemble this one all that much
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
oh yeah, "Cut Your Hair" was definitely their pinnacle of mainstream popularity, but surely that makes it less quintessential for an indie audience? Given how nostalgic-sounding the song is but anti-nostalgia the lyrics are (I guess?), to me it makes perfect sense for GS to have emerged as their "best song" now that they're in their reunion tour phase.
― elephant rob, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
Yes! And "Gold Soundz" won, but just barely:CROOKED RAIN CROOKED POLL
― jaymc, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
"Show Me Love" was a See Also
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
^^^For which entry? Do you remember?
Uncle Tupelo actually did get a shout out too, in the Wilco entry for "The Long Cut," but that's as close to country as this list got, and that's pretty goddamn far from being their best song.
Can we talk about "Via Chicago" being the Wilco choice for a second? I mean, it's a phenomenal deep cut, and I love it to death, but c'mon, "Shot in the Arm" is so good they put it on the album twice. And "Misunderstood" getting the Being There nod is a bit of a laugh, but whatever.
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
I agree that Gold Soundz is a standout on Crooked Rain, but it still doesn't sound like a watershed moment in 90's music the way "Summer Babe" or most of Slanted & Enchanted does. It just seems like people must've been repping the band, not the song--the way they did for like Tribe.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
xpost "Show Me Love" is a see also for maybe "Everybody Everybody"? #171?
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
can we all just agree that CRCR is not a great record
― do you know sixty (electricsound), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
Right, but then the editors must've selected "Gold Soundz," which just seems strange.
And CRCR is probably my favorite record of theirs.
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
Great now I have "Red Rover" stuck in my head. Thanks for nothing, Grillz.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure it was "Everybody Everybody"
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
Just can't imagine anyone getting, like, super-pumped about Gold Soundz the way you could about other tracks in Pavement's catalogue.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
CRCR falls off a cliff so fucking hard after "Range Life", it's an near-incomparable train-wreck.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
Better songs than "Gold Soundz":
In the Mouth a DesertCut Your HairTrigger CutShady LaneDate with IKEASummer BabeStereoEmbassy Row
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
...And Carrot Rope
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)
Terror Twilight > Wowee Zowee > Slanted and Enchanted > Crooked Rain Crooked Rain > Brighten the Corners
REAL TALK
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)
― Parenthetical Grillz,
Different song. Robyn's "Show Me Love":https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia2OkrWNmzE
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know/care about Pavement enough to challenge the other options, but I still think "Gold Soundz" makes sense for an inevitably nostalgic look back on the 90s from an indie perspective. From the writeup:
But "Gold Soundz" was different. It sounded like a memory in the best possible way. The first two words are "go back," and that's exactly what it does: It was easy, light, and tinged with nostalgia
― elephant rob, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
oh no one actually cares about that Robyn song
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
Nostalgia for R.E.M., rob. Which is tough as R.E.M. were both active and more successful than Pavement in the 1990s.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
not sure whether to excelsior this or not
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
Terror Twilight apologists are in my circle of death with NMH defenders.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
yeah that is hilarious, that list
― Mr. Que, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
This list only makes sense to me if I hold my laptop up to a mirror.
― her lover who appeared to come from her behind on a car (KMS), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
Different song. Robyn's "Show Me Love"
>>>Mind blown.<<<
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
"Spit on a Stranger", "Major Leagues", and "Carrot Rope" are all aces
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, August 6, 2008 10:44 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^^ these are enough to spare TT from the "it just sucks" board - add "The Hexx" & you have a flat-out stunning EP
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
xplol. REM did kind of get shafted in the poll didn't they.
I lived in Athens in the late 90s so I kind of have to defend NMH. OTOH, Jeff Mangum dated my downstairs neighbor and backed his van into my car and left without leaving a note once, so fuck him for that.
― elephant rob, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
I know people who would like to touch the hem of elephant rob's garment because of his hit-n-run mangum story
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
OTOH, Jeff Mangum dated my downstairs neighbor and backed his van into my car and left without leaving a note once, so fuck him for that.
loool
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)
more like LLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLlllllllllllooooooooooooLLLLLLLLLLLLLLlooooooooooooLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
aerosmith lighten up, buddy, it's not good to talk about yrself in the third person.
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE)
This song was just a critical part of my 90s, as were the Spice Girls' "Wannabe" and "Say You'll Be There," and Ace of Base's "Don't Turn Around," "All That She Wants," and "I Saw the Sign." Some of these no doubt sound a bit silly when you play them today, but I played them endlessly at the time, and "Show Me Love" still has one of my favorite pop choruses of all time.
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
It is a great chorus.
― (¬_¬) (Nicole), Friday, 3 September 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
sigh ilxor at the easy bait - jeff's a friend & the way people got all creepy let's-freak-a-dude-out worshipful is one of the saddest stories in all indieland
― gross rainbow of haerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 3 September 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
I don't "get" the worship/acclaim myself, really. On Avery Island is a great little fuzz-pop album but I think he went downhill with the over-earnest schtick on Aeroplane. I mean, it's a competent record, but...
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, 3 September 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)
Allmusic used to rate Aeroplane ** and Avery Island ***** but they've gone back and changed the ratings. The poor review of Aeroplane is still up though. It's pretty funny.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
That Robyn song does have a great chorus, but it's not as good as the Robin S song of the same name AND it's not as good as any of Robyn's subsequent singles.
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
i'm confused, why is robyn's "show me love" being discussed now
"do you know what it takes" was deffo the better one imo...
anyway i was happy to see "fade into you" on their list thing but overall many of the choices confused me
― teledyldonix, Friday, 3 September 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
even the review they gave for "gold soundz" for #1 is really bad (it's easily the least convincing description for the whole top 20 and it's #1!). They're just like, oh it's not particularly definitive for the 90s but it's pretty light and enjoyable, so yeah.
w/r/t the pop on the list: it's ridiculous there's no "...baby one more time"/"vogue"/"i want it that way"/"wannabe" present. i swear ...BOMT in particular had a huge amount of critical cred 10 yrs ago.
― only guy in the world (prolego), Friday, 3 September 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Madonna missing is weird, yeah, but Britney/Backstreet missing isn't weird at all; this IS still a Pitchfork list!
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
well they were all over "toxic" back in 2004.
― only guy in the world (prolego), Friday, 3 September 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
lol at Pavement taking #1...
― ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Friday, September 3, 2010 7:30 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
i think it's kind of charming. it's like pitchfork saying, "lol, no really, we're still pitchfork!" cute. maybe even read it as a bit tongue-in-cheek. a good look.
― having taken an actual journalism class (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
have we actually established that this was a manipulated outcome or are people reading a lot into this being the most liked ditty that made the shortlist?
― da croupier, Friday, 3 September 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
Britney in 2004 is not the same thing as Britney in 1999
― feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Friday, 3 September 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
Pavement was really the only band that could've topped the list--Nirvana's too obvious, My Bloody Valentine's too rote, Pulp's too British, Weezer too awful, and everything else too not rock.
They just picked the wrong song, is all.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
Also, where Gold Soundz *really* fails as a number 1 choice, is when you hold it up to B.O.B. and God Only Knows--p4k's picks as the best songs of the 00's and 60's, respectively.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Friday, 3 September 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
^^^otm.
I would have also really liked to see a Ben Folds Five song make the list. I know it was like 15 years ago, but I'm pretty sure p4k gave the s/t a 9.6 when it first came out (because it was good, and still is). I know Ben Folds has travelled a similar path as Rivers Cuomo into truly embarrassing territories, but "Boxing" would've been a good pick for the 200-150 range.
― Indexed, Friday, 3 September 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
that's a great point, the first two ben folds records walk a ton of shit that made the list
― call all destroyer, Friday, 3 September 2010 22:52 (fifteen years ago)
britney 1999 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> britney 2004 SORRY I HAD 2 SAY IT
― teledyldonix, Saturday, 4 September 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, clearly
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 4 September 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
IM SORRY BUT "I ONLY SAID" BY MY BLOODY VALENTINE IS THE GREATEST SONG OF THE DECADE IM SORRY BUT I HAD TO SAY IT WELL THERE YOU HAVE IT FOLKS IM ANNOYING
― baddest boy on the internet (kelpolaris), Saturday, 4 September 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)
I{ am [p With yU=PACMAN255BITZ
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Saturday, 4 September 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha suckas!
― hype master, Sunday, May 19, 2002 7:00 PM (8 years ago) Bookmark
― bnw, Saturday, 4 September 2010 03:56 (fifteen years ago)
pitchfork [Started by philT in March 2002, last updated 1 hour ago by bnw] 633 new answersPitchfork: The Top 200 Tracks of the 1990s: 20-01 [Started by only guy in the world (prolego) in September 2010] 366 new answers
= 999
― Bee OK, Saturday, 4 September 2010 05:02 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, "1979" is definitely the Pumpkins song that non-Pumpkins fans like. I owned Siamese Dream like most white Midwestern 14-year-olds at the time, but I'd probably go with "1979," too, for the same reason I'd go with "Lost in the Supermarket" over anything else on London Calling.― jaymc
― jaymc
I'm actually curious about this one. 'Lost in the supermarket' is also my favorite Clash song but I didn't quite understood the comparison in here.
― Moka, Sunday, 5 September 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
Dinosaur Jr "Start Choppin'" over "Freak Scene"
"Freak Scene" was '88.
― Mel Gibson, Bob Dylan, Tom Petty & the current King of Sweden (President Keyes), Monday, 6 September 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
what is the deal with the swedish fish
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
what is the deal with the polish dish
― seandalai, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)
what is the deal with police on my back by the clash
― kkvgz, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
seriously though this fish thing they're doin
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
seriously though what are you even talking about
― kkvgz, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
the swedish fish kkvgz don't act like you don't know
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
kiddin but click through any review today, like the philip jeck one:
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14724-an-ark-for-the-listener/
now look up to the right & at the masthead what do u see
http://ds.serving-sys.com/BurstingRes///Site-501/Type-0/6b0590f4-c5d8-4adf-b511-9468d3ea1078.gif
and to the right another little swedish fish fella all cute and gummy
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)
the swedish fish have also been in magazines and stuff too
― call all destroyer, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
its the kind of viral campaign that makes you think there's more to it, but there actually isn't
oh ok
it's just an ad for swedish fish
I like that it doesn't link to anything though - it's a very old-fashioned ad, just an image
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
underrated aerosmith, you have been paid by fishpork to get us to refresh the philip jeck review 100 times in hopes of seeing candy
― kkvgz, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:45 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe its something to do with this? http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/09/biebers_backstage_demands_swed.html
These aren't appearing for me... must be a US only thing? No Bigfoots either.
― sofatruck, Friday, 8 October 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
pitchbork
http://teamaltman.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Muppets-Popcorn.jpg
― i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
fishfork
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
why does the roc marciano album get a 8.1 but not a bnm?
― http://tinypic.com/r/s0wvar/7 (a hoy hoy), Friday, 8 October 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
That swedish fish is just a red herring imo.
― Harrison Buttwhistle (NickB), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
i don't see any fish
― roxyBOOzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
well the image I posted is an "open image in new tab" from the pitchfork site - there's three parts of one fish that are just stored images, not live links, and they occur on pages on the site today - I read two reviews & a news story and saw fish twice
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
hipsters luv candy
― roxyBOOzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
it's one thing that makes hipsters unique, everybody else is like "fuck candy"
― aerosmith: live at gunpoint (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
NickB killin it
― ROLLINS: MY DEMISE (DJ Mencap), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
it's hard when someone's talking about animals you don't see and all you can do is tilt your head and curse the horrors of DTs(no fish here)
― inimitable bowel syndrome (schlump), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
starting a band called fuck candy right now
― Mr. Que, Friday, 8 October 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
Fuck Chocolate Buttons
― Harrison Buttwhistle (NickB), Friday, 8 October 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
http://bit.ly/cGijp7
― markers, Friday, 8 October 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
"Hear the New Bright Eyes Album Now"
no thanks
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 January 2011 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
― markers, Monday, 31 January 2011 22:45 (fifteen years ago)
Watch: Dismemberment Plan Cover Das RacistBack in the day, beloved DC post-punks the Dismemberment Plan traditionally closed many of their shows with drawn-out versions of their first album nugget "OK Joke's Over". Frontman Travis Morrison would use the song's thrashed-out ending to riff on whatever pop or rap song happened to be running through his head at that moment. (My favorite memory of the song involved a Baltimore show where opening act Cex ran out, tackled Morrison, grabbed the mic, and sang a pretty sizable chunk of Pearl Jam's "Animal".) D-Plan, currently in the midst of their reunion tour, are continuing the "OK Joke's Over" tradition.As Eardrum NYC reports, during "OK Joke's Over" on Friday night in Boston, Morrison seized the occasion to perform a piece of Das Racist's deathless annoyance anthem "Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell". Or that's how it started out, anyway. By the end, Morrison was dementedly screaming "Chick-fil-A! Chick-fil-A!" over and over. Watch the video below, via the D-Plan's Facebook.
Back in the day, beloved DC post-punks the Dismemberment Plan traditionally closed many of their shows with drawn-out versions of their first album nugget "OK Joke's Over". Frontman Travis Morrison would use the song's thrashed-out ending to riff on whatever pop or rap song happened to be running through his head at that moment. (My favorite memory of the song involved a Baltimore show where opening act Cex ran out, tackled Morrison, grabbed the mic, and sang a pretty sizable chunk of Pearl Jam's "Animal".) D-Plan, currently in the midst of their reunion tour, are continuing the "OK Joke's Over" tradition.
As Eardrum NYC reports, during "OK Joke's Over" on Friday night in Boston, Morrison seized the occasion to perform a piece of Das Racist's deathless annoyance anthem "Combination Pizza Hut and Taco Bell". Or that's how it started out, anyway. By the end, Morrison was dementedly screaming "Chick-fil-A! Chick-fil-A!" over and over. Watch the video below, via the D-Plan's Facebook.
gahhhh why would anyone want to hear this shit
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Monday, 31 January 2011 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
"deathless annoyance anthem"
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 January 2011 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
As Eardrum NYC reports
― Jacka Laroo and Tyler Too (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
ugh that's even worse than the Dismemberment Plan show i saw last week where he sang "Like A G6"
― some dude, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:14 (fifteen years ago)
"Whip My Hair" was the winner at Friday's Webster Hall show. Though if you're offended by him putting a bit of some hit/meme at the end of that song then you shouldn't stay to the end of a D-Plan show.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:14 (fifteen years ago)
that's all not nearly as bad as the Dismemberment Plan show I saw where they played Dismemberment Plan songs
― Jacka Laroo and Tyler Too (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)
0.0
― da croupier, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:17 (fifteen years ago)
well the lyric quotes in "OK, Joke's Over" in 2000-2003 were sometimes pretty dorky but usually not quite as dorky as Far East Movement or Das Racist
― some dude, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:17 (fifteen years ago)
oh woop de shit
― da croupier, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:18 (fifteen years ago)
would have you preferred some cee-lo or something?
hahahah whiney g for the fucking WIN
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 00:42 (fifteen years ago)
mm i kind of really want to watch this video
― flopson, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:25 (fifteen years ago)
― Jacka Laroo and Tyler Too (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, January 31, 2011 7:16 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
this is really disappointing coming from another drummer i really like
and yeah re: like a g6 tags loosen up everybody
(philly got "dancing on my own" and "single ladies")
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
(which is a huge step up from "back that azz up" and "such great heights" in 03)
(travis morrison enjoys music that embarrasses rockcrits welcome to 2001)
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:34 (fifteen years ago)
rock critics were embarrassed to like the postal service?
― lilwayne.quizrewards4u.com (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:36 (fifteen years ago)
i think he meant the dismemberment plan
― Lamp, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
i wanna make myself believe, that rock critics love gibbard
― markers, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
i'm embarrassed that i like the postal service
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
srsly though, am i the only one who considers travis' total earnestness about his taste to be a really freeing positive? i don't mean like girl talk being earnest about his love for lady in the water, i mean guy who hears "like a g6" on the way to work and doesn't second-guess why he's humming it later
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
i guess -- it's only refreshing if you hang out w/ ppl who would get all self-conscious about pop songs, or only listen to singers that do that
the pfork end of year celebrity guest list was filled w/ indie artists talking about pop songs
― lilwayne.quizrewards4u.com (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
"like a g6" is obv on the high end of the corny scale, but "single ladies" & "whip my hair" are pretty agreeable hits by and large idk
― lilwayne.quizrewards4u.com (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:29 (fifteen years ago)
uhhhhh kinda? didn't andy k do a study where the-dream appeared like 6 times on pfork guest lists in 2010, but there was only one other mention of any R&B artist among all the lists??
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:31 (fifteen years ago)
Really of all p-approved acts only The Tough Alliance have genuinely "bad" taste in pop music.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:31 (fifteen years ago)
there was an awful lot of Drake name dropping this year :-/
― *kl0p* (deej), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:33 (fifteen years ago)
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, February 1, 2011 1:31 AM (29 seconds ago) Bookmark
yeah idk -- there's certainly a slant towards 'cooler' pop esp rap/r&b & not white people pop -- but i guess my point is that an indie artist covering beyonce or willow seems a bit more passé afte pfork itself started earnestly covering pop -- i think this is reflected in the taste of new indie bands that are the babies of pfork
― lilwayne.quizrewards4u.com (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:34 (fifteen years ago)
yeah like, who is 2000's equivalent of best coast & would that person have listed their dream collaboration as jay-z
― lilwayne.quizrewards4u.com (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:35 (fifteen years ago)
2000 being the year 2000 & not the decade
travis covering oops i did it again changed everything
― max, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:36 (fifteen years ago)
i know a dude irl who has expressed the opinion that earnestly liking pop music is so passe
― flopson, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:37 (fifteen years ago)
i guess i should clarify to mean that an indie band covering a pop song is not in itself passé, but any shock over that would be, yes
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:40 (fifteen years ago)
chris martin/coldplay; yes; oh and btw, they did collaborate
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
with the plan in general it was just a major part of my attraction to them from the get-go how they found the canny sense of humor in their eclecticism and still applied it sincerely to music as fearless as standard verse-chorus-verse songform gets without being perverse. they work on an ironic level in a really non-bullying way and they're shockingly inclusive from an earnest angle.
i mean i call them my favorite band(TM) because of these traits and their general perfect band-as-band (to me) personalities even though i don't play them as often as other favorite bands. i guess i'm always shocked when people take the effort to wince at them because i just can't imagine more likable personalities in musicians from a scene as churlish as indie much less d.c. indie.
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 06:59 (fifteen years ago)
probably 75% of my like 20 total ILM posts are about the dismemberment plan
― dum assantino (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:00 (fifteen years ago)
howd you like the travis morrison solo albums?
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:00 (fifteen years ago)
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, February 1, 2011 1:57 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
wtf are you talking about on various levels
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:03 (fifteen years ago)
my bad, it looks like best coast's album DID go double platinum domestically *shuffles off*
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:04 (fifteen years ago)
1. for a while it was like an indie band covering a pop tune = audience goes "how ironic!"2. then for a second it was like an indie band covering a pop tune = audience goes "what a cool and fascinating choice!"3. then there ceased to be anything inherently notable or interesting about the idea of an indie band covering a pop tune, unless it was genuinely an awesome cover4. and at that point why would your indie band try covering a pop tune? it's not going to seem inherently interesting, and chances are slim that you've got a version of a beyonce song or whatever that does something worthwhile with the original5. (combo pizza/taco etc. is not exactly a pop hit and thus doesn't really count in this, plus is also pretty straightforward as a "random thing to shout at a show" choice)6. the end?
(note: I always felt like the dismemberment plan did this somewhere between period #1 and period #2 above, sort of baiting the audience by saying "you think this is ironic but I LIKE POP, OPEN YR DAMN MINDS ffs," which was possibly influential in the transition from #1 to #2)
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:07 (fifteen years ago)
okay so i'm speaking hypothetically, assuming best coast will suddenly take the f off and sell 2m records in 2011
xp j0rd
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
the year 2000 equivalent of best coast being all "omg i wish i could work with drake *quotes a drake line*" would've been like neko case being all "get me on a track w/ cam'ron and i can die happy" -- it's a different world
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:10 (fifteen years ago)
no whiney weingarteno but i would be interested in hearing how the crowds at the d-plan reunion shows reacted to "whip my hair" & "like a g6"
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:11 (fifteen years ago)
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, February 1, 2011 2:00 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
i like both travis albums a lot, especially the second one (i think i pazzed it at #8 or so that year). they're a little more they might be giants-y perhaps but i'm totally amazed how many people feel the gap between those and plan albums is that huge and i really fail to see what they're missing. "angry angel" is a really bad song, sure. for me, "you make me feel like a freak," "change," "song for the orca," "born in 72," "people die," "the word cop," "churchgoer," "hawkins' rock" would all make a career best-of.
i shrugged at the maritime stuff and consider the statehood album to be the only grave misstep by any plan members so far. i think travis' web-only "snacktime" and "checkers and chess" are funny as shit.
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:15 (fifteen years ago)
umm, come to think of it, "whip my hair" also translates pretty exactly into a rock "yelling something over and over" context -- there's not even a stretch there. it has no genre.
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:20 (fifteen years ago)
like, it is also nu-metal and several different types of techno
yeah that is also true -- i still contend that if it was a rihanna song it would've been fully embraced by pitchfork & its ilk & that's not cuz rihanna could've done the song any better but there's still a line of like "will smith's 9 year old daughter" that a lot of ppl aren't willing to cross
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:28 (fifteen years ago)
uhhh just heard "whip my hair" for the first time no lie (& saw the video) and wtffffff. like, it's okay? i gueeeess??? but like, parents, get control of yr 10 year olds! wtf. i have an 8 yr old myself & no way i'd try to turn her into a budding pop star in two years. she can sing to miley & taylor in our living room.
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:31 (fifteen years ago)
aren't you like 23 years old?
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:31 (fifteen years ago)
if that was a rihanna song it've been the worst song of her career, sorry
25 xp
don't even feel like arguing this but i'll just say that rihanna has some shit singles
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:33 (fifteen years ago)
and, my point is less about the quality of "whip my hair" & more about gate keeping & stigma etc
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
"i still contend that if it was a rihanna song it would've been fully embraced by pitchfork & its ilk & that's not cuz rihanna could've done the song any better but there's still a line of like "will smith's 9 year old daughter" that a lot of ppl aren't willing to cross"
yeah, without wanting to generalize it to just "pitchfork," i definitely believe there's a line in the sand re: "approved" pop a lot of the time with indie/crit/people-who-consider-themselves-serious-about-music
kind of caused me to have a reverse-prejudice myself about robyn until very recently
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
"disturbia"'s the only rihanna song i consider very fun
never got the big deal about beyonce's "crazy in love" either beyond cool horn riff
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:37 (fifteen years ago)
ranked:
rude boyumbrellarussian roulettepon de replaydont stop the muzakonly girldisturbiarehabunfaithfulsoshardhate that i love ustfu and driveif it's lovin..rockstar 101take a bow
okay, so maybe it'd rank alongside "break it off" and "what's my name"......? cool
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:37 (fifteen years ago)
okay, it'd be better than "what's my name" -- you win
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
it's also better than "love the way you lie" ft. rihanna
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:39 (fifteen years ago)
lord "whip my hair" is like a million times better than "hard" & "rockstar 101"
ANYWAY funny that you mention "what's my name," which showed up in the pfork list even tho most ppl agree that it's a middling rihanna single -- if that's a willow single it doesn't even come close & again there would be an imperceptible change in quality (allowing for the fact that the dancehall undertones of the song are more fit to rihanna)
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:39 (fifteen years ago)
i've made this argument before about ciara & other stuff tho
oh i forgot about "s.o.s."
that was fun too but it's almost cheating when you have the soft cell laser noise
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:40 (fifteen years ago)
ciara's "like a boy" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any song mentioned in the last bunch of posts
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:41 (fifteen years ago)
okay okay yr right ;_;
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
idk what the hell this thread is about but "what's my name" w/o drake is not a middling rihanna song, it's absolutely one of her best. such joyous lyrics but the tinge of sadness and self-doubt in her delivery turns it into something incredibly compelling.
back to whatever
― maybe i'm just gay (Tape Store), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 07:49 (fifteen years ago)
i still contend that if it was a rihanna song it would've been fully embraced by pitchfork & its ilk & that's not cuz rihanna could've done the song any better but there's still a line of like "will smith's 9 year old daughter" that a lot of ppl aren't willing to cross
I think this is less to do with pfork or whatever being anti will smith's daughter and more to do with the fact that pitchfork et. al. take some time to latch onto R&B / rap / pop / dance artists, very rarely will they start frothing about an artist in those genres on their very first single.
Pitchfork et. al. listen out for rihanna singles, there's an expectation that they'll be covered and staff will have an opinion and etc. whereas generally by the time momentum starts to gather behind the idea of a new non-indie-rock artist's first single being fanastic the moment for reviewing it has passed, and if it's not reviewed it's unlikely to then get sufficient momentum to place in end of year charts.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 08:01 (fifteen years ago)
And this is how we end up with things like Pitchfork reviewing an artist's third single with the tossed off cooler-than-you context "remember when we all flipped out about her first single??" and if you didn't flip out about that single you have catching up to do and that's why pfork is still cooler than you.
Or something? It's such a weird set of dots to connect.
― HOOS the master?? STEEN NUFF (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 08:47 (fifteen years ago)
there's still a line of like "will smith's 9 year old daughter" that a lot of ppl aren't willing to cross
nah ime that novelty value made it a lot easier for...this type of listener to embrace "whip my hair", in a way they wouldn't have done had it been by any non-megastar r&b chick? when it comes to pop, the line that people aren't willing to cross comes with artists like nicole scherzinger (see tim f's thread comparing her to lady gaga) and ashlee simpson and p. diddy (people who, the indie consensus would have it, are just there to be mocked).
re: coverage of rihanna, it's hard to escape the feeling that her worth to pfork and its ilk is entirely bound up in her fame & success, given that similar artists in her genre who don't have as high a profile as her (won't bring in the page hits!) get roundly ignored (trey songz, fantasia, keri hilson...any of them get coverage this year?)
― lextasy refix (lex pretend), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 09:26 (fifteen years ago)
Would agree with first paragraph, absolutely.
Would mostly agree with the second except that I think it's less fame and success per se than just celebrity and well-known backstory (and, not unimportantly, back-catalogue) conferring personality pretty readily. I think it's true to say that Rihanna can "carry" a tune like "What's My Name" by virtue of that sedimentary accumulation of associations, it's not merely more likely to be heard in the first place, but also a bit more memorable for that (pretty arbitrary in some ways) reason as compared to if it was released by a more journey(wo)man -ish R&B performer.
That same benefit of the doubt won't get extended to Kim Kardashian obv. And I don't think it's extended to Mariah (for reasons even more arbitrary).
In 2011 I want to be more on the ball w/r/t sourcing R&B albums as they leak and then pitching reviews.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 10:16 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think this applies to Willow but yes, it's always just a handful of names. From a UK perspective it was Kylie in the 90s, then Britney and Beyonce, then Girls Aloud and Sugababes, now Rihanna and Gaga. You could say this is just because they're the best examples, and there's only so much "approved" pop allowed through the doors, but they also represent a certain idea of indie/crit-friendly pop which I would try and unpack if I weren't on deadline - for one thing, it can't be coincidence that all these egs are female.
― I've been dancing since 9 and I'm tired and hungry (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
Justin Timberlake got the indie-critic seal of approval in the UK though, didn't he?
There's a case for saying that even ultra-commercial male stars are shifted into different genres by critics (R&B, grime, electro, etc) while female singers tend to get lumped together as 'pop', in the UK. The weighting towards female stars in critical circles does seem to be inversely proportionate to the gender balance of the writers though.
Their critical acclaim probably shouldn't be overstated, however. Robyn and Janelle Monae seem to be genuine breakthroughs this year but more obviously mainstream-aligned acts like GA, Britney and Beyonce - while picking up fawning articles all over the place - rarely seem to figure in end-of-year polls.
― ShariVari, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
srsly though, am i the only one who considers travis' total earnestness about his taste to be a really freeing positive?
No. Reading the D-Plan website ca. 2002 probably played a part in preparing me to fully embrace pop music and stop feeling guilty about guilty pleasures. (The transition was complete after I discovered ILM in 2003.)
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:17 (fifteen years ago)
Ben Gibbard's cover of Avril Lavigne's "Complicated" is sort of like this, too. Midway through, he half-shushes the tittering crowd, saying "This is serious" and afterwards emphasizes the point: "I really fucking love that song."
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
that's an admirable cover choice, if he really does like it, i guess, but ben gibbard is insufferably annoying
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
this is awesome tim!
btw, j0rdan, i think "whip my hair" has won me over by sheer force of its hook. 8 hours later, next morning, and i can't get the damn tune out of my head all through breakfast, car drive, now at work, i mean woooooow
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
i only played it ONCE and all i hear looping in my brain is
I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH I WHIP MY HAAAAIRR BACK AN FORTH
still think it's kinda creepy that she looks like a pre-pubescent will smith w/ braids, tho O_O
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
You should hear Neil Young & Springsteen cover it
― van smack, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
...what else would you expect the pre-pubescent daughter of will smith to look like?!
― lextasy refix (lex pretend), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
if he really loved it he'd leave it be :(
Why?
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
bc he's rubbish
― lextasy refix (lex pretend), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
Oh.
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
avril's rubbish too
rubbish twee indie singer with rubbish taste in pop music shockah
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
3. then there ceased to be anything inherently notable or interesting about the idea of an indie band covering a pop tune, unless it was genuinely an awesome cover4. and at that point why would your indie band try covering a pop tune? it's not going to seem inherently interesting, and chances are slim that you've got a version of a beyonce song or whatever that does something worthwhile with the original
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, January 31, 2011 11:07 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
to be all serious guy...
we go to live shows to see what artists can do with the songs they play, but also simply to see and hear the artists as human beings, to forge (or feign) a "personal connection" of some kind. i.e., the audience for live performance is often just as interested in the artists and what they reveal about themselves performatively as they are in the larger social environment or the music-as-music. in this sense, covers are personally revealing and thus an inherently interesting part of the live show, even if the performer isn't doing anything all that notable with them.
another way to look at it is to say that when an artist plays his/her own songs to an audience, the basic contract of the "live show" is upheld. an implicit promise comes with each purchased ticket: "you, my fan-friend, will spend an evening listening to songs you know and love." when material from an alien context is introduced to the performance, this implicit agreement is threatened. after all, an indie audience is collectively more likely to enjoy the indie music of the indie artist they've paid to see than they are the pop (or metal or hip hop or whatever) song the performer has suddenly introduced into the moment. fans are forced out of their "bonding moment" comfort bubbles and must ask themselves what this new thing might mean and whether or not they're okay with it.
every artist/fan relationship possesses a specific semiotic texture reflecting a web of aesthetic and social agreements. both discomfort and its partner, humor, are therefore present in any sudden transformation of that texture. there's nothing wrong with any of this.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
>>>srsly though, am i the only one who considers travis' total earnestness about his taste to be a really freeing positive?No. Reading the D-Plan website ca. 2002 probably played a part in preparing me to fully embrace pop music and stop feeling guilty about guilty pleasures. (The transition was complete after I discovered ILM in 2003.)― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:17 (2 hours ago)
― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:17 (2 hours ago)
― proso_Opopoeia (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
xp I don't know if this contradicts any of what you're saying, but uh... I think it's a pretty well-established part of the "contract" in this case that the Plan will end the show with Travis shouting lyrics to one or two random songs over "OK Joke's Over" jamming -- not really sure that this bit of harmless and very-much-in-character fun takes anyone out of their comfort zone, altho it does give internet ppl something to roll their eyes at afterwards
― proso_Opopoeia (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
of course there's a frisson of daring generated when a sensitive indie dude busts out his cover of an R&B hit, due to the fact that indie cats aren't necessarily into that kind of music, but the same thing goes on in dance music right? like the club audience is there for a certain beat & sound, and the DJ can generate tension by pushing against that box a bit, drawing in neighboring sounds or even crazy outliers. plus it's fun to spot quotations in the mix, to discern the implied narrative in a selection of records by other people.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
Travis did this at open mics in college, going from say, Too Much Joy's "Crush Story" to "Baby's Got Back" or something. It was always earnest - he absorbed and loved lots of stuff, just like most people, including his audience.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
I guess what I'm trying to say is just that the Dismemberment Plan is too unique a case to support a bunch of broader speculation about 'what indie dudes (are) like' -- I don't even really think of their jams as 'covers', and the 'meaning' or 'message' or whatever goes about as deep as the "Now Listening:" sidebar they used to have on their webpage.
― proso_Opopoeia (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
like IIRC he did the lyrics of the Cheers theme song at one point -- is this a plea for a populist reappraisal of music usually denigrated as disposable/incidental, or maybe just a bit of fun?
― proso_Opopoeia (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha there is no line in the sand of indie "approval" for Willow Smith that is or will ever be as deep as ILX's line for Ben Gibbard
seriously, though: I completely agree that there are obvious trends in what pop crosses over (under?) to this audience's attention, but I think putting it all down to what's "approved" or "okay to like" is sort of a self-fulfilling vision of things; some part of it is going to be a matter of actual taste and actual liking. that's how all crossover works, right? there's a slightly arbitrary and incomplete amount of pop that appeals here, and same for metal, and an arbitary and incomplete amount of indie that gets metalheads' attention, and so on. there are clearly types of indie/rock bands that are "okay to like" and "not okay to like" on ILX, but I'd never imagine that as some weird conspiracy of approval, just ... people's actual taste
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
lex i def lol'd the day you were twittering about neil young covering willow smith on jimmy fallon and didn't realize it was jimmy fallon imitating neil young...but it was an affectionate lol fyi
― smang a goon (get it on) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
putting it all down to what's "approved" or "okay to like" is sort of a self-fulfilling vision of things; some part of it is going to be a matter of actual taste and actual liking. that's how all crossover works, right? there's a slightly arbitrary and incomplete amount of pop that appeals here, and same for metal, and an arbitary and incomplete amount of indie that gets metalheads' attention, and so on. there are clearly types of indie/rock bands that are "okay to like" and "not okay to like" on ILX, but I'd never imagine that as some weird conspiracy of approval, just ... people's actual taste
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, February 1, 2011 8:26 AM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark
OTM.
otoh, there are mechanisms by which tastes get transmitted and authoritatively-granted "approval" does play into that. but that's okay, too. there are a lot of questionable assumptions behind criticism of the fact that the pitchfork audience is into the-dream but not R&B in general. i mean, pitchfork and their audience are indie-centric and there's no way around that. they're curious about the larger musical world and deserve credit for that, but their engagement with non-indie music is necessarily more superficial than their engagement with the likes of, say, wilco and animal collective. we all have the niches we more-or-less inhabit and from which we make dilettantish journeys into "new lands." maybe pfork and "generalist" critics in general are a bit pretentious in claiming to cover not just their beloved niche but music in general, but not uniquely pretentious, and i think we all know what the real focus is.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)
"otoh, there are mechanisms by which tastes get transmitted and authoritatively-granted "approval" does play into that. "
christ ur talking like this matters
― history mayne, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lemejcCaHL1qzngqr.gif
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
Remember when D-Plan covered DMB and it sounded exactly the same?
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
Are there any "major" "indie" artists who are like "I enjoy obscure punk singles from the 80s" or "2010 had lots of good bands on mini-labels such as random bizarre rock bands A B & C"
Or is this pretty much what we're stuck with? Lame indie losers trying to sound cool by covering current songs everyone has heard a million times?
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
ariel pink covered a semi-obscure 60s track on his record does that count?
― ciderpress, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that counts. And I would def label that track obscure.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
If it weren't for my favorite 4 or 5 Dismemberment Plan songs I would probably really hate them.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
sure. pink eyes is all into old punk and his band is on matador. tbh, i hear a lot of fondness for skatepunk and crossover thrash from indie types. not many covers though, that's true. indie covers of old punk tunes was kind of a thing for a while though, and maybe it's played out atm. otoh, indies are always big upping their kin, putting out fancy-colored split singles where they cover each other's tunes and shit.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure "old punk single," "80s college-rock classic," and "1970s singer-songwriter tune" are still the big standard things for indie bands to cover, far more than contemporary pop
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
yung folks deciding it's ok to like u2 again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEXjvNFCtQw
― smang a goon (get it on) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:51 (fifteen years ago)
"Remember when D-Plan covered DMB and it sounded exactly the same?
― billstevejim, Tuesday, February 1, 2011 12:30 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark"
i laughed
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
it's always been ok to like U2
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
re: pink eyes, i thought that 2xcd singles comp from a year ago was a billion times better than the fucked up album i was told was accessible cuz it had flutes and 7-minute prog-foo fighters hybrids about reincarnation
― the people's squee (kiss out the jams), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
― the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, February 1, 2011 7:00 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
glad that's settled
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
glad i could assist
― Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)
avril's had more than one awesome single btw
― markers, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)
Fuck, remember when D-Plan covered Owl City and it sounded suspiciously similar? Are these guys ever in the same room at the same time?
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
Nirvana introduced me to The Wipers and Fang.. And believe it or not, NIN introduced me and many others to Joy Division. I'd like to think some actual young music fans who read Pitchfork might appreciate the cover choices by No Age and Japandroids in the same respect.. or even like Crystal Castles covering Platinum Blonde, who I had never heard of before 2 months ago.. Some bands have gotten it right in the past year or so.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
Also MGMT are kinda cool for covering The Clean.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)
Los Campesinos, Foals, Dave Grohl all seem to be at pains to do one or both of these when able
― Rogaine's a hell of a rug (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
covering old punk songs from the 80s is awesome, basically just like the traditions of folk music
― smang a goon (get it on) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
video game coverage y'all
http://pitchfork.com/news/42385-pitchfork-announces-partnership-with-ikill-screeni/
― markers, Monday, 2 May 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
super wilco 3 - 6.4 - bnm
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
wilco will love you baby
― markers, Monday, 2 May 2011 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
o cool i never knew how bad i wanted to read a nick sylvester essay about angry birds
― call all destroyer, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
hahahaha that's the only one of them i'm actually going to read :D
― markers, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
this is weird
― J0rdan S., Monday, 2 May 2011 22:41 (fifteen years ago)
i read it--it was actually pretty good
― call all destroyer, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
eh not that weird--some of the principals @ kill screen are ex-p4k dudes
― call all destroyer, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
Where is the ilxor poll compiling all of the Odd Future stories just like with the National and Wavves?
― Wacky Way Lounge (Evan), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure which headline I hate more.. "Fugazi Might Still Reunite One Day" or "Pixies Might Make Another Album One Day"
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
And of course both are currently in "most read"
top ten most read:
Take Cover: Radiohead: The King of LimbsRadiohead to Play The King of Limbs on TVListen: The Black Keys Cover Buddy HollyGo Behind the Scenes With Tyler, the CreatorBig Boi Talks Modest Mouse CollaborationNew Washed Out: "Eyes Be Closed"Fugazi Might Still Reunite One DayWatch: Thom Yorke DJs, Sings at L.A. ClubDecemberists' Conlee Diagnosed With Breast CancerYup, Washed Out's Album Cover Was in Cosmo
― ilxor running, w/ laptop in hand, checking ILX as he sprints (ilxor), Thursday, 12 May 2011 00:32 (fifteen years ago)
3 radiohead, 2 washed out, 1 each black keys, odd future, big boi/modest mouse, fugazi, decemberists
― ilxor running, w/ laptop in hand, checking ILX as he sprints (ilxor), Thursday, 12 May 2011 00:33 (fifteen years ago)
thx 4 breaking that down
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 12 May 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)
hahahaha u are truly mad
― flopson, Thursday, 12 May 2011 01:56 (fifteen years ago)
looks like p4k is the only entity in existence that still gives a shit about the new radiohead record
― markers, Thursday, 12 May 2011 01:59 (fifteen years ago)
Scott to replace Bill Keller oh wait.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 June 2011 20:59 (fourteen years ago)
I've got a lot of love for Mark, I'm sure he'll do a great job.
― lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 2 June 2011 21:13 (fourteen years ago)
yeah Mark is the man
― a http://bit.ly/kv895M (some dude), Thursday, 2 June 2011 21:22 (fourteen years ago)
Nice, congrats, Mark. And best wishes to Scott!
― jaymc, Thursday, 2 June 2011 21:28 (fourteen years ago)
^^^^
― markers, Thursday, 2 June 2011 21:38 (fourteen years ago)
congratulations markand happy travels, scott
― sean gramophone, Thursday, 2 June 2011 22:11 (fourteen years ago)
!
nice, i love Mark's writing, fantastic guy. congrats!
any word where scott's off to?
― i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Friday, 3 June 2011 03:17 (fourteen years ago)
http://bit.ly/dx2fKJ
― markers, Friday, 3 June 2011 03:18 (fourteen years ago)
okay actual lol @ that
― i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Friday, 3 June 2011 04:07 (fourteen years ago)
:D
― markers, Friday, 3 June 2011 04:09 (fourteen years ago)
Well, there it is, then.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 9 June 2011 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
Bowers returns, says a few things. Reminds me of something Chuck Eddy and I were talking about on the podcast the other way and it sounds like he's hit his own limit too.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 17 August 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)
and we've got a redesign y'all: http://pitchfork.com/
― markers, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
8) LCD Soundsystem ended.
No other act claimed the past, present, and future so authoritatively, archly, and elegantly
― a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
http://pitchfork.com/news/43826-welcome-to-pitchfork/
― markers, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:11 (fourteen years ago)
I don't get it at all, the last one was very good, why bother changing it to unreadable and chaotic version only for the sake of it "being new"? the new one's ugly and needs serious tweaking
― V79, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
looks fine, is unusable.
― lukas, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
"The new edition features larger, clearer images, improved organization" - lol, one negates the other, bigger pictures make everything a mess
― V79, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:15 (fourteen years ago)
plus: there's a hidden dick in their new logo
― V79, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
― V79, Sunday, August 28, 2011 6:18 PM (53 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
you write this as if it's a negative
― D-40, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
depends on the dick
― a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
As opposed to most overhauls that cater to tablet users, I actually think this one maintains a bit of workability on a desktop. I likes.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:25 (fourteen years ago)
looks like Platform now, and god knows that website looked horrible.
― Darren Huckerby (Dwight Yorke), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:25 (fourteen years ago)
xp but I clearly said it's a plus! at least it's hilarious which is something of a redeeming quality
― V79, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:34 (fourteen years ago)
I don't get it at all, the last one was very good, why bother changing it to unreadable and chaotic version only for the sake of it "being new"?
i for one am shocked pitchfork would dedicate space to something that's not very good but really new
― brrr-icane aye-rene (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:36 (fourteen years ago)
did the last redesign have the word "media" in it?
it's totally gone now!
― brrr-icane aye-rene (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:37 (fourteen years ago)
LOOK AT THE ARROW IN THE "k" THEY ARE REALLY MOVING UP IT'S LIKE FEDEX BUT LESS OBVIOUS!
― Cass McCars (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:40 (fourteen years ago)
http://cdn.pitchfork.com/media/7.27.11.jpg
No "media" apparently.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, gotta say that the old layout is probably better
― markers, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)
less confusing at least
― markers, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:45 (fourteen years ago)
Most recent layout (before now) looks way more polished/professional than the new one re: font choices, logo, borders and such. While the new one is still usable, it's a step backwards identity-wise.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:47 (fourteen years ago)
looks way more polished/professional
basically
― markers, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:47 (fourteen years ago)
I mean, this is just butt ugly
http://pitchfork-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/images/pitchfork-title.png
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:48 (fourteen years ago)
those dents in P and F look out of place and weird
― V79, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:50 (fourteen years ago)
pitch pound ork
― game of pwns (Lamp), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:52 (fourteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/x8Lclevin http://imgur.com/x8Lcleller
― brrr-icane aye-rene (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:52 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngevin http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngeller
fuck the http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.png
― brrr-icane aye-rene (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:53 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngonfounded's http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngultural http://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngorner
― D-40, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:53 (fourteen years ago)
Now that I think about it, there's way too much negative space in the masthead. It just makes the butt ugly look buttier.
Layout/functionality of new site: AAesthetics: D-
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 28 August 2011 23:54 (fourteen years ago)
The old layout let me take in most of the site's new headlines and material in a single glance, while this update forces me to scroll down more to reach videos and features. It's oddly dense, too. I get why they did it, but it's ugly.
― Millsner, Monday, 29 August 2011 00:24 (fourteen years ago)
disappointed that 'family' doesn't take me to p4k kidz!
― thistle supporter (mcoll), Monday, 29 August 2011 02:58 (fourteen years ago)
http://image1.findagrave.com/photos/2009/234/39782159_125104231223.jpg
― buzza, Monday, 29 August 2011 03:13 (fourteen years ago)
― brrr-icane aye-rene (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, August 28, 2011 7:36 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
A+
― ✇ ruehl (some dude), Monday, 29 August 2011 03:17 (fourteen years ago)
havent looked at this redesign but i _hate_ it when things get redesigned
― back in a .gif ;) (flopson), Monday, 29 August 2011 03:18 (fourteen years ago)
lol whiney
― frogsb (k3vin k.), Monday, 29 August 2011 03:22 (fourteen years ago)
still can't browse old reviews. I'll keep checking back periodically til they stop getting that wrong.
― he's the deej, i'm the hipster (kkvgz), Monday, 29 August 2011 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
The news section cracks me up sometimes, "Phoenix frontman marries longtime girlfriend, btw, here'sthe "1901" video".
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 29 August 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)
btw during the 15 anniversary features Pitchfork brought back their most famous articles that weren't available on the site. so bad they forgot about Schreiber's 'trane review :( (and the 1996 Modest Mouse interview - in which the band took the piss out of poor young Ryan - isn't on the site either)
― V79, Monday, 29 August 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
interesting move cutting criticism from trax reviews & down to like <100 words
― back in a .gif ;) (flopson), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 01:57 (fourteen years ago)
nah trax reviews & forkcast were combined
― D-40, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
Anything to make the site more readable on an iPhone I guess.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/pitchfork_forks_its_logo.php
Brand New readers hate it (as expected).
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 03:58 (fourteen years ago)
the logo honestly reminds me of someone reading one of those OMG HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED THE ARROW IN THE FED EX LOGO email forwards/message board threads in like 2003 and then like having it stick with them forever as something clever they want to aspire to at the expense of good design
― delmar dillinger (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 04:06 (fourteen years ago)
i really hope the site doesn't look like this for the next two years
― markers, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 04:07 (fourteen years ago)
^ this
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 04:14 (fourteen years ago)
the circles around the ratings are new too, aren't they?
i don't like those.
― j., Wednesday, 31 August 2011 04:50 (fourteen years ago)
did they make some tweaks to the new design? if they didn't, i got used to it pretty fast, because i think it looks better now
― markers, Sunday, 4 September 2011 03:37 (fourteen years ago)
marhttp://i.imgur.com/x8Lcl.pngers
― morb derp (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 4 September 2011 04:02 (fourteen years ago)
it's a step backwards identity-wise.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, August 28, 2011 11:47 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark
^ this. it looks like any of the dozens of third-and-fourth-tier review sites out there. nothing distinctive about it at all.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 September 2011 04:06 (fourteen years ago)
i literally laughed out loud when I read this:
The clatter of the bones against felt or tabletop is a visceral pleasure. And there's that breathless moment when everything settles and you're reading the results.
Pitchfork is writing purple prose about Yahtzee now
http://pitchfork.com/killscreen/18-its-your-move-our-new-board-game-columnist-has-three-dicey-propositions/
― morb derp (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
fyi board games are pretty sick
― max, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
would you say the clatter of the bones against felt or tabletop is a visceral pleasure? and there's that breathless moment when everything settles and you're reading the result?
― morb derp (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
I can;t even begin to tell you the deep visceral pleasures I felt the last time I played Parcheesi
would you say the clatter of the bones against felt or tabletop is a visceral pleasure?
Every time I click on "Site New Answers."
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
hmmm the game i usually play has wooden dice
― max, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
ok wtf i want a column writing abt board games
― Lamp, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
i play d&d competitively son cmon
lamp have you played dominion yet? played it a ton last week w/ some friends in san francisco, its pretty great
― max, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
kill screen is a whole sister site full of the early-pfork purplest of prose, yall, so go to town
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
pitchfork please hire me to write a column where i do tarot readings for indie rockers
― diamonddave85, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
how can something clatter against felt
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)
like, what is on that felt to make the dice clatter
gross
yeah i played a couple of games of it just to get a feel at a boardgames night, got creamed tbh.
the board game that im kinda an evangelist for atm is puzzle strike, which uses cardboard chips instead of cards and is loosely based on the mechanics of 2d fighters. its super replayable and surprisingly deep but also p dense, theres only a small amount of luck involved so it can be a frustrating game for new players
― Lamp, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:43 (fourteen years ago)
i havent really been feelin dominion ,seems like theres not enough interaction w/ other players compared to e.g settlers of catan? but then maybe i need an expansion pack or something else
― just sayin, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
how can something clatter against felt― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Tuesday, September 6, 2011 2:22 PM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Tuesday, September 6, 2011 2:22 PM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this fucking destroyed me
― morb derp (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
"clatter of the bones against felt" is some "forks clove tofu" type ish
― some dude, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
― just sayin, Tuesday, September 6, 2011 2:49 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it doesnt get really good till you start using the attack cards and then its SUPER fun--i dunno i can see it being something youd burn out on unless you were constantly expanding
still no settlers but lets be real--what is
― max, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 19:10 (fourteen years ago)
http://1000timesyes.tumblr.com/post/9896731523/trivial-pursuits
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 00:07 (fourteen years ago)
so is this like the nerd version of 'mtv sports'
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 00:14 (fourteen years ago)
jesus christ you have a tumblr to collect your tweets?
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:19 (fourteen years ago)
that's 'pitchfork has a column devoted to board games' level horrifying
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:21 (fourteen years ago)
whines I know you're gonna hate but you gotta admit balls has a point here
― pathos of the unwarranted encore (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:25 (fourteen years ago)
sorry to be all PRACTICAL but twitter doesn't really archive stuff in the long term and whiney's twitter is kind of famous so maybe give him a break
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:27 (fourteen years ago)
why would whiney deserve a break on anything, ever
― iatee, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:33 (fourteen years ago)
i have no argument there
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 01:39 (fourteen years ago)
jesus christ you have a tumblr to collect your tweets? --balls
That post is collecting other people's tweets, balls
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:13 (fourteen years ago)
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, September 6, 2011 8:07 PM (2 hours ago)
http://www.gifbin.com/bin/032010/1269602956_dr-mccoy-and-captain-kirk-approve.gif
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:19 (fourteen years ago)
The image can't be displayed for the moment!Please go to www.gifbin.com to see it.
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
apparently n+1 has written a "review" of pitchfork
needless to say, *barfs up entire body so much skin goes inside out*
― max, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
here's the first part of it: http://nplusonemag.com/54
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:22 (fourteen years ago)
LMAO
look @ the first words
hey guys any ideas of where i can pitch my numerically rated review of n+1
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:26 (fourteen years ago)
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/09/pitchfork_n1.html
― max, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:30 (fourteen years ago)
*starts n+1 reviews reviews tumblr*
― buzza, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:33 (fourteen years ago)
"blake eyed peas"
― mutant slow drum (BradNelson), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:33 (fourteen years ago)
what is n+1?
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:34 (fourteen years ago)
depends on what n is
― max, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:35 (fourteen years ago)
srs question xp
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:35 (fourteen years ago)
“n+1 is rigorous, curious and provocative. Intelligent thought is not dead in New York. It has simply moved to Brooklyn.”—Malcolm Gladwell
― iatee, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:40 (fourteen years ago)
amazing quote
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:40 (fourteen years ago)
a Brooklyn literary journal
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
― mutant slow drum (BradNelson), Tuesday, September 6, 2011 10:33 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
i'm gonna assume that this was nymag's mistake
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:43 (fourteen years ago)
Benefactor
We'll meet to discuss new projects and recognize your gift in each issue. We'll also send you an invitation to our annual party for friends and contributors as well as advance notice of all our public events. And we'll give a one-year subscription to you or a friend.
$10,000.00 USD
― buzza, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:43 (fourteen years ago)
great value
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:52 (fourteen years ago)
wonder if any of their dads actually went through w/ it
― iatee, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:57 (fourteen years ago)
*suppresses urge to stridently defend n+1*
― Lamp, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 02:59 (fourteen years ago)
'whiney's twitter is kind of famous' = 'jeffrey jones porn collection is kind of famous'
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:00 (fourteen years ago)
lamp, i'd be interested to read yr defense of n+1
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:03 (fourteen years ago)
then buy this month's issue of ilx
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:08 (fourteen years ago)
cancelled my subscription after that j4gg3r guy stopped writing for them
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:09 (fourteen years ago)
I like n+1 and all, but I had a real hard time reading the Pitchfork piece. For instance, here's a footnote from Beck, this August:
Lynn Hirschberg, writing for the New York Times Magazine in May 2010, finally made some of these points in a profile called“M.I.A’s Agitprop Pop,” but the best critique of M.I.A. wasn’t made by a critic. It appeared in the lyrics to a song by Vam-pire Weekend, in which frontman Ezra Koenig sings about a young woman attending what it seems obvious to me is anM.I.A. concert: “A vegetarian since the invasion / She’d never seen the word ‘Bombs’ / She’d never seen the word ‘Bombs’/ blown up to ninety-six-point Futura / She’d never seen an A.K. / In a yellowy DayGlo display / A T-shirt so lovely it turnedall the history books gray.”
Here's something I wrote last June, in a column Beck mentions a couple times:
She'd never seen the word BOMBS blown up to 96-point FuturaShe'd never seen an AK in a yellowy Day-Glo displayA t-shirt so lovely it turned all the history books grayIt's hard for me to hear those lines without immediately thinking of M.I.A. And the last line, the way I understand it, is exactly the right kicker: Turning some of these things into an aesthetic-- or a cloak to be worn-- can step on the reality of them in a way that's worrying, especially if it's not coherent.
It's hard for me to hear those lines without immediately thinking of M.I.A. And the last line, the way I understand it, is exactly the right kicker: Turning some of these things into an aesthetic-- or a cloak to be worn-- can step on the reality of them in a way that's worrying, especially if it's not coherent.
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:16 (fourteen years ago)
I mean, along with general lack of time, the fact that I'm fond of n+1 is a lot of how I've resisted the urge to sit around picking this thing to bits. The piece is well-argued and maybe "provocative" in its way, but it's so full of received wisdom and conventional poses (not just about Pitchfork but about criticism, music, and maybe especially class) that it's just ... about a billion times less insightful than it presents itself as.
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:37 (fourteen years ago)
Obv the issue with doing anything like this is actually getting past received wisdom.
Based on the opening section posted it seems that the writer falls into much the same trap he ascribes to pitchfork critic, being focusing on perceived values and intentions and motivations rather than the output. Does it get more concrete later on?
― Tim F, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:40 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i have zero interest in reading beck's piece but i think w/o bias that n+1 has published some really strong criticism in the past and has a reasonably 'worthwhile' pov
but i mean an n+1 article abt p4k that starts off talking about an ilm thread whos subject was pazz and jop is sorta grotesquely worlds-colliding to really sit down and read
― some derp (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:40 (fourteen years ago)
agree with this.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:41 (fourteen years ago)
well i mean less worlds-colliding than a collision at a heavily trafficked intersection in a busy part of town but yknow
― some derp (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:41 (fourteen years ago)
*waves at richard beck*
― max, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:45 (fourteen years ago)
hey guys let's really clusterfuck this thread up and maybe get Beck in here and then this could form the intro for a future article about ilx conversations about n+1 articles about ilx conversations about provocative p4k comments about village voice polls!!!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:50 (fourteen years ago)
They've published loads of great criticism. I'm glad they exist. Beck does really good and ambitious work with the piece! It's just that a lot of the ideas he's coming at, in such authoritative depth, are pretty much the same as the obvious, lazy, weird, or knee-jerk ideas you get from the superior dude in the comments box. They're operating at a higher intellect level, perhaps, but they make the same blind assumptions.
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 03:54 (fourteen years ago)
I literally can't fathom the obscene lack of self-awareness it would take for someone to turn in a piece of print writing with the word "ILX" in it.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:00 (fourteen years ago)
whiney did you go the symposium they had about h1psters last year??
― some derp (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:01 (fourteen years ago)
i guess this isn't gonna be like the time EW wrote about ILX
― Mordy, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:01 (fourteen years ago)
xpost,
i didn't know about it (omg so unhip), but i read the book and, inside, one of my friends was there (no suzy) and asked a question based on one of my familiar talking points. so I was there in spirit.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:12 (fourteen years ago)
I was gonna question you on that, Whiney, but Kelefa's rockism piece had the URL wrong, so it never actually said "ILX"
One important thing I should mention about the full piece: it actually winds up making the case that Pitchfork is not so much a problem as just a reflection of a bigger problem with indie-rock. And this isn't something all that many people would take issue with, but it drifts into question-begging, vagueness, and stock skepticism at exactly the wrong moment...
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:15 (fourteen years ago)
someone put this shit on a pdf because there's no way on earth i would sleep at night if i gave n+1 a single nickel to read an review of pitchfork
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:17 (fourteen years ago)
hahahaha
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:18 (fourteen years ago)
I just got a pdf. I'm blindly skimming through the fascinating-looking Juggalo article
"She lit a menthol and took a swig from her son's Faygo"
"Sometimes I got pushed into the hydrangea bushes and called white boy."
"Our senior class song was “Tipsy” by J-Kwon."
"I ate a few chocolate Luna bars, soft and fecal-looking in the heat; immediately regretted it."
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:24 (fourteen years ago)
gonna just blindly past shit from this Pfork article in quotes
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:27 (fourteen years ago)
And on John Coltrane, recorded live at the VillageVanguard: “’Trane takes it to heaven and back with some style, man. Some richness, daddy. It’s a sad thing his life was cut short by them jaws o’ death.”
Faced with an album this new and this great, DiCrescenzo paid it the highest compliment he could think of: he made a list of Radiohead's influences.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:28 (fourteen years ago)
where promoters like Todd Patrick—bet- ter known as Todd P—had begun to orga- nize DIY concerts
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:29 (fourteen years ago)
whiney cmon
― some derp (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
i can't imagine anyone who would care at all about this not knowing every single fact Beck presents
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
pretty good example of this kind of indie rock fan is me. In the two years since I graduated from college, I’ve had a pretty good time being “broke” in New York and drinking “cheap” beer with my friends. But sometimes I remind myself that the beer I’m drinking is not actually cheap, and that furthermore I am not actually broke: if I married someone who made the same sal- ary I make, our household income would be slightly above the national median, which is also true of almost every person I spend my free time with.
But the story of The Beatles doesn’t begin with John, Paul, George, and Ringo deplaning at JFK. It begins with Jean-Philippe Rameau’s 1722 Treatise on Harmony, which began to theo- rize the tonal system that still furnishes the building blocks for almost all pop music.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:31 (fourteen years ago)
wait the dude that wrote this is only two years out of college?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:31 (fourteen years ago)
guys call an ambulance, i smh'd so hard i think i broke something
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:32 (fourteen years ago)
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:35 (fourteen years ago)
has anyone written a thorough history feature of pfork yet? it seems like that'd be a better way of 'taking down' both the corny indie fuxxor 'stylised' pfork of dicrescenzo/bowers heyday and the dull consumer guide choking on our legacy pfork of today. it would also allow a writer to acknowledge that the pfork of ten years ago only barely resembles the pfork of five years ago barely resembles the pfork of today. why/how/when it surpassed cmj, spin, whether a conscious decision was made to turn away from unrepentant rockism and how, gossip, whether it still really does have the impact it had a few years ago, etc.
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 04:48 (fourteen years ago)
no because its a thing that 2 million ppl read but only like 2,000 people really care about
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:01 (fourteen years ago)
no genre’s fans are more vulnerable to music criticism than the educated, culturally anxious young people who pay close attention to indie rock.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:05 (fourteen years ago)
how does this article not have the part about hipinion sneaking into the pitchfork servers?
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:06 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/lrpqD.gif
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:07 (fourteen years ago)
I used to read pitchfork in the mornings like 3 years ago and haven't really read it w/ any regularity since
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:08 (fourteen years ago)
like maybe once in a couple months when I'm bored and want to laugh at something for a minute
One year later, in a review of The Roots’ Things Fall Apart, Samir Khan congratulated the group on featuring“an intelligent rapper.”
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:11 (fourteen years ago)
the pre-internet-era film High Fidelity.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:13 (fourteen years ago)
Matt LeMay, who still works for the site as a senior contributor, put up a picture of a cactus instead of his face
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:14 (fourteen years ago)
“[Our writers] genuinely care about music,” the pitch read, “unlike some of the big time playaz that’re just in the business for the bling bling.”
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:15 (fourteen years ago)
Nirvana, a three-man band out of Aberdeen, Washington
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:18 (fourteen years ago)
*sigh*
― xkrillex (Lamp), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:18 (fourteen years ago)
spill it, lamp
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:19 (fourteen years ago)
Groups like Sebadoh and The Mountain Goats began recording on cheap, low-fidelity equipment (think: a boombox)
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:19 (fourteen years ago)
think: abt it
― markers, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:19 (fourteen years ago)
i think more than 2000 ppl definitely used to care about it at one point at least, the first person i ever heard about pfork from was kevin barnes lol and he DEFINITELY cares about pfork and i can remember when i still worked at wuxtry this record store in town that the only thing that was guaranteed to move volume like a pfork rave was an npr feature, i can remember customers telling me they had pfork as their homepage (and me probably telling them 'you should read the wire' lol) and i can remember if i went to the computers in the uga library guaranteed if you looked at user history someone in the past hour had looked at either pitchfork or the jamband database and i definitely remember this pfork review or that pfork review being the subject of conversation. i'm sure this is more a reflection of me being older, etc (god knows) but that john maus interview was the first thing on pfork i can remember ppl irl talking about (beyond liking yr usual nabisco or tom ewing column on facebook) since the black kids review (which for pfork's demo is a generation ago), even here nobody pretends anyone actually reads the reviews (smart move by pfork keeping the score after the jump).
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:45 (fourteen years ago)
you're talking about reading it, i'm taking about "actually gives a dribbling shit about its inner workings and politics" which is reserved for mischpusha, hipinion, ilx and a few people in bands
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 05:54 (fourteen years ago)
if the movie to be made out of new republic gossip and a huge bestselling book (and apparently potential movie) to be made out of espn gossip i guarantee you there's a magazine feature to be made out of pfork gossip, esp since there's apparently mutliple thinkpieces and a potential mumblecore movie to be made out of 'what does pfork signify???'.
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 06:19 (fourteen years ago)
guh typos galore, going to bed
http://i.imgur.com/dZP7b.png
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 06:32 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/gzJd1.png
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 07:09 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/97v09.png
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 07:15 (fourteen years ago)
let's not forget that scott's charming little freakout on here was reported in the daily swarm and a whole bunch of places, so i'm guessing richard beck just saw that and doesn't, like, regularly lurk here (although he might be reading right now, hi boo!)
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 11:38 (fourteen years ago)
So all you have to do is say "I want a PDF of the article" and one will magically appear in your inbox?
― *ter jacket (jaymc), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:34 (fourteen years ago)
welcome to web 3.0
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:35 (fourteen years ago)
I want a magical pony and candy for the rest of my life. Via PDF.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:45 (fourteen years ago)
FWD: MyLittlePony_Candy_Catalog.pdf
― cheerful sound ur (schlump), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:50 (fourteen years ago)
Always figured Ned was a secret Brony
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:53 (fourteen years ago)
What the hell is the movie about "New Republic gossip"?
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:53 (fourteen years ago)
shattered glass
― max, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 14:55 (fourteen years ago)
could be a could template for Shattered Raff: The Nick Sylvester Story
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:00 (fourteen years ago)
Wow, I kept googling because i couldn't possibly think balls was stupid enough to equate a world-famous case of journalistic fraud "New Republic gossip."
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:06 (fourteen years ago)
man why you gotta break his...stride like that
― all shitley chess club (some dude), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
Like the difference is that there literally hasn't been a story coming out of Pitchfork that's a modicum as interesting as Stephen Glass to make a movie about. I'm sure middle america would be riveted by the harrowing tale of how hipinion got a joanna newsom album three weeks early, and the other time Nasty Little Man got mad at them, and that day they had the word "rape gaze" on their site for five hours. Keep thinking the ppl that went to see Shattered Glass were all New Republic stans though with your hilarious graph that proves literally nothing, balls.
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:10 (fourteen years ago)
whiney one gets the sense that your conclusions here are rather more strongly rooted in personal antipathy than in sober analysis
― pathos of the unwarranted encore (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:45 (fourteen years ago)
i'm sure middle america would be riveted by the harrowing tale of how hipinion got a joanna newsom album three weeks early, and the other time Nasty Little Man got mad at them, and that day they had the word "rape gaze" on their site for five hours. Keep thinking the ppl that went to see Shattered Glass were all New Republic stans though with your hilarious graph that proves literally nothing, balls.
enh ppl like media gossip generally i mean i dont think any1 in 2011 cares abt pitchfork particularly but i bet a decent gossip-y 'oral history' style magazine feature abt tha fork wld get 'mad page views'
― Lamp, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:49 (fourteen years ago)
i'd say let this one play xp
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
the whole 'i could never spend ten bucks on a literary magazine, let me regurgitate out of context quotes for lols, refusal to engage w/ideas' thing is just p dispiriting
i mean i guess its a p dumm article w/e who cares just seemed sad atm
― Lamp, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
fully support n+1 btw
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 15:57 (fourteen years ago)
because there's nothing really to engage with? nitsuh already said it. it's 5,000 words of recieved wisdom thats basically stuff that every person on this thread knows about already. Its like a book report.
but i bet a decent gossip-y 'oral history' style magazine feature abt tha fork wld get 'mad page views'― Lamp, Wednesday, September 7, 2011 11:49 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Lamp, Wednesday, September 7, 2011 11:49 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
that is true
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)
hee hee:
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:09 (fourteen years ago)
if indie rock fans are so educated, how do you explain Foster The People
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)
no-one in the world actually likes Foster the People
― pathos of the unwarranted encore (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:11 (fourteen years ago)
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:14 (fourteen years ago)
also: zombies
if there was an apparently untapped market for a feature on the history of THE NATIONAL to be grantland's big coming out piece (and unless i'm mistaken still the only thing that's been on grantland that couldn't have appeared on page 2 or vulture)(besides the ongoing legitimization of carles) i promise you there's a market for a history/behind the scenes of pfork, esp since there is apparently a huge market for regular hack thinkpieces on 'pfork: what does it all mean?'.
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:41 (fourteen years ago)
It means we avoid the phrase "think pieces."
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:43 (fourteen years ago)
i'm not gonna dignify these things by pretending they're essays.
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:46 (fourteen years ago)
will compromise w/ 'things that make you go hmm'.
― balls, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
is the moon in Scorpio or some shit everybody seems megapissy on like every thread today
― pathos of the unwarranted encore (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:50 (fourteen years ago)
nb there's a 99% chance it's just me for not sleeping
you haven't seen the latest posts on the "are you a hipster?" thread yet, have you
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:51 (fourteen years ago)
is the moon in Scorpio
two months to go!
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
Paying close attention to "indie rock" is so 1992. I read Pitchfork as much as any music lover (once a week if I'm lucky) and I just don't know anyone who does this. With 9/11 and the U.S. involved in two wars I think people have different priorities.
― Where Does My Pictures Go? (Mount Cleaners), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
9/11 made me prioritize grime
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
xpost -- Most people in general aren't paying attention to 9/11 (except now as an anniversary-related news item) or said two wars either.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
Never forget.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
No, but I'm sure 9/11 and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan altered people's news consumption habits greatly, and those habits sink in. Most people I know on Facebook, for example, spend more time with newspapers and opinion pieces.
It's not that I hate Pitchfork or find it dull, it's that I use it more as a consumer than as someone who consumes music opinion in and of itself.
― At Tax Masters, We Help Solve Your Tax Problems! (Mount Cleaners), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
I think it's an ongoing habit of a lot of people to look at things like pop music, and pop music press/criticism, and have this furious epiphany that it, let's say, "merely supports an existing consumer culture" -- as opposed, I guess, to being a bold, radical, revolutionary critique -- which to me is the biggest, strangest DUH thing in the universe. It's called POPULAR music! It exists in a space that's sort of between being a entertainment product and being fine art! This is a lot of what makes it great and interesting and gives it the potential to be really fascinating! What's maybe been harder for people to wrap their heads around is the idea that pop writing exists in a similar space between, you know, consumer/entertainment reporting and really seriously committed criticism. (And the market is mostly for the former of those two things.)
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 September 2011 23:34 (fourteen years ago)
wait was mount cleaners serious? i thought that was a john maus joke above.
― balls, Thursday, 8 September 2011 00:08 (fourteen years ago)
Most people I know on Facebook, for example, spend more time with newspapers and opinion pieces.
this is called "growing up", yo.
― Tim F, Thursday, 8 September 2011 01:10 (fourteen years ago)
Who the hell is John Maus?
― You Suck Dr McCloud's Dick For a Living (Mount Cleaners), Thursday, 8 September 2011 01:22 (fourteen years ago)
a meme from a little while back
― markers, Thursday, 8 September 2011 02:09 (fourteen years ago)
you missed this one, Whiney:
The truth is that I inherited expensive tastes and moved to an expensive city, and sometimes I get cranky about not being able to buy what I want. But when I don't feel like reminding myself of these things, I can listen to indie music.
i bought the n+1 issue for the juggalo article, as well as to see if there were any letters printed about the evils of the ipod article from the previous issue.
― sarahel, Thursday, 8 September 2011 08:03 (fourteen years ago)
― he's the deej, i'm the hipster (kkvgz), Monday, August 29, 2011 11:29 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark
By the way, there isn't some blindingly obvious way to do this, is there? I've asked before and received no response.
― kkvgz, Thursday, 8 September 2011 12:02 (fourteen years ago)
go to reviews and start clicking back through the pages. here's 1999:
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/601/
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 September 2011 12:51 (fourteen years ago)
I'm more interested in the good old days when you could browse alphabetically.
― kkvgz, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:00 (fourteen years ago)
Although that is pretty cool.
Ha! I rather like this, CAD! If you enter in random page numbers to the URL, you come up with all kinds of weird historical contextualizing music knowledge. El-P's Fantastic Damage was reviewed in the same week as Silkworm's Italian Platinum. Sparta's Wiretap Scars and Sleater-Kinney's OneBeat. It sort of has the effect of going back in time to record store visits of yore and looking at the employee picks.
― kkvgz, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:08 (fourteen years ago)
yeah it's actually pretty fun
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:18 (fourteen years ago)
Just ... while we're on the topic, did anyone read Beck's n+1 piece about rap and Losing My Cool? That one's all online, and has the same odd quality of reading really well, sounding incisive and authoritative, and then having these massive bizarre gaps and wrongnesses in thinking.
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:20 (fourteen years ago)
lol u guys read pitchfork
― H3LP, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:22 (fourteen years ago)
h3lp us, we read pitchfork
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:26 (fourteen years ago)
POST THIS THING ONLINE, FOR CHRIST'S SAKE
― wolves lacan, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:54 (fourteen years ago)
N can you link that?
― D-40, Thursday, 8 September 2011 13:55 (fourteen years ago)
looking forward to nabisco stop tip-toeing around beck and just opening fire in indie music critic beef extravaganza 2011
― Mordy, Thursday, 8 September 2011 14:08 (fourteen years ago)
http://nplusonemag.com/authors/beck-richard
Richard Beck?
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 September 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
http://nplusonemag.com/express-yourself
September 2010 article
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 September 2011 15:57 (fourteen years ago)
totally thought this was gonna be Beck (Hansen) :(
― you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 September 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
Me too... No otm for Nabisco
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
agree w/nabisco's estimation tho, that article is odd
― you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:23 (fourteen years ago)
Ha, no "beef," the guy's an amazing writer and really perceptive -- there are just these amazingly huge pitfalls in thinking certain things through, I guess. And those gaps become especially annoying when you happen to be writing in a very high-handed tone. I'm tempted to try and enumerate everything that's incredibly weird about that hip-hop article, but it's probably not that important and anyway, this is the Pitchfork thread.
― ንፁህ አበበ (nabisco), Thursday, 8 September 2011 17:55 (fourteen years ago)
For me, not playing Ocarina of Time until now has been the ultimate exercise in abstinence. As a kid, sex takes on the status of myth, written from overheard shards of older sibling chatter, glimpses from late-night Showtime movies, and the burbling of our own adolescent bodies. Until you have it, all you know about sex is that you want it, and once you do, the sky will color over in sublime hues of gold and lavender and the world’s impoverished will dance together on a floor of regenerating sandwiches. Or something. Point is, sex is supposed to be pretty much the best thing ever. Just like Ocarina of Time. So how does the reality fare? This 30-year-old virgin of Hyrule aimed to find out.I insert the game card, gently, into the slot of my Aqua Blue system. As I walk over to a red chaise lounge the system slips out of my fumbling hands, falling onto the carpet. I flashback to my first kiss, in my parent’s garage—It gets better the more you do it, she told me—and with that in mind, I begin my quest.
I insert the game card, gently, into the slot of my Aqua Blue system. As I walk over to a red chaise lounge the system slips out of my fumbling hands, falling onto the carpet. I flashback to my first kiss, in my parent’s garage—It gets better the more you do it, she told me—and with that in mind, I begin my quest.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:35 (fourteen years ago)
srsly
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:35 (fourteen years ago)
This 30-year-old virgin
obv the pertinent phrase
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:37 (fourteen years ago)
is that from the Pitchfork Kid A review?
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:38 (fourteen years ago)
i wrote something on spec for kill screen and they kill-screened it :(
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
not enough personal sexual confessions i guess
ugh
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)
the day i made love to metal gear solid: hardcore fucking solid snake
― Mordy, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
to me it reads as if the author is trying to write in this 'New Yorker'-ese--it doesn't flow naturally, though it gets better as the piece goes on
lots of passive voice, too
― geeta, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:04 (fourteen years ago)
that's a good desc of p4k writing in general. trying to write in new yorker style when you can't actually write
― Mordy, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
they didnt want my piece abt 'sakura wars', dating and the 'ideal woman' either
― fart nosie (Lamp), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
the juggalo article seemed a bit Nathaniel West-ian
― sarahel, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:10 (fourteen years ago)
Please tell me that ocarina of time thing isn't real
― gucci mane is like 'îron to me (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:12 (fourteen years ago)
it's an actual game, yes
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:13 (fourteen years ago)
It's better than sex.
http://pitchfork.com/killscreen/17-everybodys-doing-it-how-playing-legend-of-zelda-ocarina-of-time-as-a-30-year-old-reveals-its-magical-adolescence-of/
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:14 (fourteen years ago)
I think back now to the day I bought Ocarina of Time 3D. When I came home I felt a surge of excitement; I was finally going to experience this long-cherished title. I held the glistening package in my hand, expectant and ready. Then I saw my live-in girlfriend on the bed, much the same. I set down the plastic Nintendo box. Here was another Low Spot to explore. The mysteries of an imaginary kingdom could wait.
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:15 (fourteen years ago)
holy
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)
When I was young, my house abutted acres of forest. One area in particular took on an aura of magic. It was called The Low Spot. After raking leaves or scooping dog poop, I would gather this debris in a wheelbarrow and push onward to the end of the woods. There, a dozen paces in, was a natural pit, a recess deep into the ground, capable of swallowing whatever found its way into this damp maw. I would roll toward the edge and tilt the wheelbarrow up, letting the compost tumble and fall into The Low Spot. Every time I came back, the trench seemed even deeper. Maybe it was growing. Maybe I'd be next.
Was his dog Clifford??????
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)
a natural pit. a recess deep within the ground.
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
Twelve years later, Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time released for the Nintendo 64. It was immediately heralded as one of the greatest games yet conceived. Peer Schneider’s review for IGN64 began with this declaration: “The new benchmark for interactive entertainment has arrived.” I remember a friend popping the gold cartridge into his system; I don’t remember much about that same friend for months, so enraptured was he by this new polygonal world. When it released in 1998, I was almost 17. The main conceit, that you were an elfish naïf destined for greatness, an anonymous boy growing into adulthood while slashing monsters and questing for rubies, didn’t resonate with me. Maybe I was too old already, hung up on swatting baseballs for my high school team or trying to look cool while standing in a parking lot. Maybe I wasn’t old enough, not yet matured beyond all that surface grandstanding. Maybe it was all the other stuff resonating in me, the jittery fluids coursing through my endocrine glands. I was more concerned with saying hi to Katie M. in French class than with finding the three Spiritual Stones. I already had two, and damned if I knew how to use them.
THIS IS JUST... NO
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:18 (fourteen years ago)
. Of course, any game we play (or book we read, or film we watch, etc.) will be flavored by our unique circumstances. But this particular journey, taken at this particular stage of life, seems less accepting of a player’s real-life projections. The first time I see the dark lord Ganondorf, his elongated nose and sharp features remind me of my brother-in-law. A cut scene explaining the creation of the Triforce, the Zelda series’ most important relic, resembles too closely a plot-line from Superman 2. Princess Zelda appears slightly mannish. Had I played Ocarina when it first came out, I doubt any of these distractions would have pierced the game’s fiction.
dude
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
― iatee, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
reading kill scrn kinda gives me some insight into the deep well of rage that whiney and strongo have access to
― fart nosie (Lamp), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:21 (fourteen years ago)
― sarahel, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:21 (fourteen years ago)
reading kill scrn kinda gives me some insight into the deep well of rageLOLS that whiney and strongo have access to
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:22 (fourteen years ago)
As a young teen you lie on your bed, look up at the curved shadow on your ceiling, a tree limb or some other knobby protuberance
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:23 (fourteen years ago)
oh my god
OH MY GOD
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:25 (fourteen years ago)
don't even blame you for missing my post of that because i understand how you must have been sucked in
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
eye-scrapingly bad xp
― Mordy, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/42/ATribeCalledQuestTheLowEndtheory.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
"baby, when you lie on my bed like that you remind me of the compost heap behind my parents' house... so sexy"
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
can we theorize about "I held the glistening package in my hand, expectant and ready", like what is the idea there
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
"I want to dump a wheelbarrow of dogshit in you"
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
haha yeah I was reading the article at that point and boggling
he's gotta realize how ridiculous this is
― sarahel, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:32 (fourteen years ago)
Of course, any game we play (or book we read, or film we watch, etc.) will be flavored by our unique circumstances.
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:32 (fourteen years ago)
coincidentally i watched a girlfriend play this exact game for the first time recently and it was fun because environments/situations that i was totally used to and just saw as technical problems w/ known solutions seemed to her like real places with real mystery and danger, like, when she saw giant fire-breathing dinosaurs she hid behind a corner and slowly crept around when they weren't looking instead of just running past them disinterestedly. made me appreciate the game more. which this article discusses! almost, for a second. before it returns to girl/compost-heap metaphors.
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:33 (fourteen years ago)
I really feel like "unique circumstances" is a euphemism for this dude
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:33 (fourteen years ago)
About
Jon Irwin writes essays, eats food, plays video games, and loves his niece and nephew. He also teaches Composition and Literature at various colleges in Boston.
He recently took a Staff Writer position with Kill Screen, a videogame + culture company. Other work has been published in LUMINA, Transitions Abroad, Down East, Paracinema, Monkeybicycle.net, GamePro, and Ann Arbor Paper, among other fine periodicals and websites.
In 2008, he was a finalist for the Francis Ford Coppola Journalism Internship. View the stunning video application that lost him the job here.
He is working on his first book, tentatively titled Enough: or, The Manny Diaries, about his year as a male au pair in France.
In 2009, he was selected for the PEN New England Discovery Award in Nonfiction.
― buzza, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:35 (fourteen years ago)
Jon Irwin writes essays, eats food, plays video games, and loves his niece and nephew.
http://mlkshk.com/r/6BXL
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
I held the glistening package in my hand, expectant and ready. Then I saw my live-in girlfriend on the bed, much the same.
Doesn't this also imply the girlfriend was holding her own glistening package?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
Me Write Shitty Every Day
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:38 (fourteen years ago)
http://ediblewrecks.blogspot.com/2008/07/encyclopedia-wine.html
― buzza, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:38 (fourteen years ago)
― fart nosie (Lamp), Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:21 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark
booming post
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:39 (fourteen years ago)
Gary Busey said... Nice job! July 31, 2008 10:47 PM
Nice job! July 31, 2008 10:47 PM
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:41 (fourteen years ago)
I am still laughing my ass off at this
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:45 (fourteen years ago)
what the fuuuuuuuuuck @ this
― k3vin k., Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:46 (fourteen years ago)
this is totally making me nostalgic for the original Pitchfork, where every other review they published was as insane as this
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
as this article has proven, nostalgia can be a dangerous thing
― sarahel, Thursday, 8 September 2011 19:53 (fourteen years ago)
First, I thought "are they playing Zelda together in bed?"Then I thought "I want to dump a wheelbarrow of dogshit in you"
― fear itself (Ówen P.), Thursday, 8 September 2011 20:04 (fourteen years ago)
lol me too well done
― you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 September 2011 20:10 (fourteen years ago)
24 hours later I am still having giggle fits
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
better giggle fits than giggle shits
― Mr. Que, Friday, 9 September 2011 19:51 (fourteen years ago)
plz i rly would like to read the n+1 article if somebody has a pdf :-)
― niels, Monday, 12 September 2011 09:34 (fourteen years ago)
http://nplusonemag.com/54
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 21 January 2012 01:27 (fourteen years ago)
a couple words in and I'm hyped for this thread
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 01:51 (fourteen years ago)
Indie’s self-deception has had consequences for fans as well. One kind of fan, at least originally, was the lower-middle-class white person, frequently a college dropout, who got by on bartending or other menial work and tried to save enough money to move out of his parents’ house. This kind of person got involved in indie rock to acquire cultural capital that he’d otherwise lack. A pretty good example of this kind of indie rock fan is Ryan Schreiber. In the last decade, however, indie rock has classed up, steadily abandoning these lower-class fans (along with the midsized cities they live in) for the young, college-educated white people who now populate America’s major cities and media centers. For these people, indie rock has offered a way to ignore the fact that part of what makes your dead-end internship or bartending job tolerable is the fact that you can leave and go to law school whenever you like. A pretty good example of this kind of indie rock fan is me. In the two years since I graduated from college, I’ve had a pretty good time being “broke” in New York and drinking “cheap” beer with my friends. But sometimes I remind myself that the beer I’m drinking is not actually cheap, and that furthermore I am not actually broke: if I married someone who made the same salary I make, our household income would be slightly above the national median, which is also true of almost every person I spend my free time with. The truth is that I inherited expensive tastes and moved to an expensive city, and sometimes I get cranky about not being able to buy what I want. But when I don’t feel like reminding myself of these things, I can listen to indie music.
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 01:57 (fourteen years ago)
I am proud of myself that that is what I was going to initially copy and paste
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 01:58 (fourteen years ago)
but I'll do this one instead:
The strangest thing about Pitchfork is that, for all its success, it hasn’t produced a single significant critic in fifteen years.
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 01:59 (fourteen years ago)
the article was kind of boring and didn't being anything new to the table for how long it was, the author's kind of a dick for blowing scott's spot up though
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:00 (fourteen years ago)
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:03 (fourteen years ago)
i don't know if i'm gonna be able to make it through this
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:08 (fourteen years ago)
https://twitter.com/#!/RichBeck
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
false that mark richardson is not a significant critic.
― j., Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/215868785/Twitter_reasonably_small.jpg
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:12 (fourteen years ago)
otm
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
buzza irl
― markers, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
Although Broken Social Scene, Arcade Fire, Sufjan Stevens, M.I.A., and Animal Collective all produced sophisticated, intelligent music, it’s also true that they focused their sophistication and intelligence on those areas where the stakes were lowest. Instead of striking out in pursuit of new musical forms, they tweaked or remixed the sounds of earlier music, secure in the knowledge that pedantic blog writers would magnify these changes and make them seem daring. Instead of producing music that challenged and responded to that of other bands, they complimented one another in interviews, each group “doing its own thing” and appreciating the efforts of others.
hahaha you can like those artists or not like them but uh what?
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:19 (fourteen years ago)
buzza has been around for years. he has the biggest collection of photos from all the rotary events/weddings you can manage to get to and is a top bloke that watches out for people.dannyag2005 2 years ago 3
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:19 (fourteen years ago)
When Jay-Z decided, as an obscenely wealthy entertainment mogul, that he wanted finally to leave his drug-dealer persona behind, he got himself seen at a Grizzly Bear concert in Williamsburg.
uh you may have missed a couple steps here dogg
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:21 (fourteen years ago)
I’ve had a pretty good time being “broke” in New York and drinking “cheap” beer with my friends. But sometimes I remind myself that the beer I’m drinking is not actually cheap, and that furthermore I am not actually broke: if I married someone who made the same salary I make, our household income would be slightly above the national median, which is also true of almost every person I spend my free time with. The truth is that I inherited expensive tastes and moved to an expensive city, and sometimes I get cranky about not being able to buy what I want. But when I don’t feel like reminding myself of these things, I can listen to indie music.
oh cool now i know what this piece is actually about
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:23 (fourteen years ago)
i still can't believe anyone thought this was a good idea to publish. 'long, shrill, slightly clueless attack pieces disguised as weighty, ambivalent scholarly considerations of Pitchfork' are becoming almost as overdone as 'long, shrill, slightly clueless attack pieces disguised as weighty, ambivalent scholarly considerations of The Daily Show.'
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:30 (fourteen years ago)
this is the best tho:
Most of all, though, we need new musical forms. We need a form that doesn’t think of itself as a collection of influences. We need musicians who know that music can take inspiration not only from other music but from the whole experience of life. Pitchfork and indie rock are currently run by people who behave as though the endless effort to perfect the habits of cultural consumption is the whole experience of life. We should leave these things behind, and instead pursue and invent a musical culture more worth our time.
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:33 (fourteen years ago)
oh my bad why were we making indie rock we should have been inventing new musical forms
love when writers commission the ambitious musical revolution they fantasize about but have no ability to take part in or describe in any concrete terms. "ok, musicians, hop to it! i'm ready for some new forms!"
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:36 (fourteen years ago)
didnt we go over this like five months ago?
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:36 (fourteen years ago)
fun stupid fact: i almost had a piece published in this issue of n+1 but i couldnt finish it on time
oh i fucked that up: the same issue this appeared in
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:37 (fourteen years ago)
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Friday, January 20, 2012 9:36 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
did we? i'd never seen this before.
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:39 (fourteen years ago)
love the disp name btw
fun fact: I am a sentence in n+1
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:39 (fourteen years ago)
The footnote about All Music Guide is so inaccurate and funny that I don't know where to begin.
― Andy K, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:40 (fourteen years ago)
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Friday, January 20, 2012 9:36 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it's particularly amazing in this piece because the guy never explains what he even likes about music or why he cares about this topic but he DOES cop to listening to indie rock!
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
i think before we were just discussing the opening excerpt that was online at the time.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
that is fun!
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)
'uh oh i'm having a fantasy' - keith gessen on his gossip girl appearance
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:43 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i think in a thread about n+1 rather than one about pitchfork. some dude is right i dont think it was online yet tho but whiney and nabisco weighed in, the merits of n+1 as a thing that exists were debated i somehow managed not to embarrass myself goodtimes
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:45 (fourteen years ago)
"it should be called h+1+n+1 because this shit is worse than bird flu amirite"
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 02:47 (fourteen years ago)
lonely guy thinking baout things
― bnw, Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:00 (fourteen years ago)
asks for something new, regurgitates 500 things already said
― bnw, Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:03 (fourteen years ago)
amazing, insightful, 90% spot-on article, but in the spirit of indie rock...
[i]Although Broken Social Scene, Arcade Fire, Sufjan Stevens, M.I.A., and Animal Collective all produced sophisticated, intelligent music, it’s also true that they focused their sophistication and intelligence on those areas where the stakes were lowest. Instead of striking out in pursuit of new musical forms, they tweaked or remixed the sounds of earlier music, secure in the knowledge that pedantic blog writers would magnify these changes and make them seem daring. Instead of producing music that challenged and responded to that of other bands, they complimented one another in interviews, each group “doing its own thing” and appreciating the efforts of others.[i]
total horseshit. i don't know how blinded by your own thesis you'd have to be to describe MIA and animal collective primarily in terms of their "tweak[ing] the sounds of earlier music", but, uh, it'd have to be a lot. a lot blinded.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:35 (fourteen years ago)
you really think this is amazing?
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:35 (fourteen years ago)
fubk
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:36 (fourteen years ago)
he makes one valid and useful point afaict--that pitchfork is about curation not criticism
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:36 (fourteen years ago)
hell yeah, but i die inside everytime that PRR thread gets bumped, so what do i know?
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:37 (fourteen years ago)
he makes an even more valid and useful point in describing what it meant to be a curator in the late-indie/early-internet era
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:38 (fourteen years ago)
the difference between this article and PRR is miniscule aside from the overall tone and intent
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:39 (fourteen years ago)
xp i guess? if you haven't been paying attention for 10 years?
this article is probably 5 years too late, seriously.
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:39 (fourteen years ago)
hope everyone is alright being quoted on your opinion a few years from now
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:40 (fourteen years ago)
Pitchfork’s endless “Best Of” lists should not be read as acts of criticism, but as fantasy versions of the Billboard sales charts.
OTM, and it speaks to the weird better-than-ness that both indie and rock criticism assume without addressing
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:40 (fourteen years ago)
"rock criticism" meant as just that
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:41 (fourteen years ago)
acting like Pitchfork invented Best-Of lists is even nuttier than acting like Pitchfork invented the scale of 1 to 10
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:41 (fourteen years ago)
like people honestly have no idea how the grounds on which they get unreasonably mad at pitchfork totally give away the tunnel vision perspective that allowed them to get that heated to begin with
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:42 (fourteen years ago)
By keeping user-generated comments off the site, Pitchfork has behaved more like a magazine than the magazines have. The only major modification Schreiber made to the print template—putting reviews, not interviews or features, at the center—was an ingenious adaptation to the dynamics of internet buzz: interviews may sell the rock and roll lifestyle, but reviews are what blogs will link to and argue about. Finally, of course, there is the archive. By constantly updating and adjusting its archive—whether by deleting early reviews or by writing up a reissued album for a second time—Pitchfork has become the only music publication to attempt an account of what it felt like to be a music fan in the last fifteen years.
obvious as hell, and discussed to death around here, but OTM and well worth saying
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:44 (fourteen years ago)
it's more the way pitchfork has defined (or at least prominently reflected) the function and implication of "best" lists in an online environment.
some cart-and-horsing there...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:48 (fourteen years ago)
"i'm glad they finally kicked that horse, i was really tired of it just laying around all dead and stuff for the last few years" (xpost)
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 03:50 (fourteen years ago)
another thing i like about the article is that it admits, without ever quite saying, that online music-criticism-consumption has made contemporary music criticism exceedingly cowardly and self-protective. rather than being lost to a past curated only by a few obsessive, ratlike archivists, everything a critic (or person) says online is now made available right there, right now, ripe for mockery in retrospect. this in turn has made most criticism exceptionally dull and safe. it says only that which it believes it will be able to defend from the slings and arrows of wikipedia-armed internet snarkmasters a year or two from now. this is good in many ways, but it's also a bit dispiriting, tending more to snideness and buttoned-down authoritarianism than to wayward, personal self-expression.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:12 (fourteen years ago)
i don't know who the piece's audience is because i don't know who reads n+1 and obv for some audiences (this one f'rinstance) it's nothing new, but i think the first two-thirds, where it's just a history of pitchfork, are pretty comprehensive and accurate and sometimes insightful, and then it does this:
+ + +
and on the other side of the pluses it's suddenly attributing the publication of jay-z's memoirs to his attendance of a grizzly bear concert and implying that all indie rock listeners can "go to law school whenever they like"
― occupy the A train (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:16 (fourteen years ago)
In the last thirty years, no artistic form has made cultural capital so central to its identity, and no musical genre has better understood how cultural capital works. Disdaining the reserves of actual capital that were available to them through the major labels, indie musicians sought a competitive advantage in acquiring cultural capital instead.
OTM regarless of how stupid the supporting anecdote abt jay-Z and grizzly bear may be. same goes for the bit about the increasingly obvious middle-classness of indie, despite its early, 80s-era pretensions to down and out chic. the author's self-indictment on this score, mocked above, only drives the point home. helps amplify the sharp arguments relating to the political dimension of pitchfork's endorsement of earnest indie pastoralism:
This new interest in pastoral nationalism seemed like a strange fit for indie rock; or at least it made plain that indie rock was in the hands of a new and different generation of fans. At the height of the Iraq war, college graduates poured into cities and took internships at magazines, nonprofits, and internet startup firms. They found themselves drawn, for some reason, to adorable music that openly celebrated our national heritage. They dressed like stylish lumberjacks and watched Sufjan perform dressed as a Boy Scout, and they remembered a disappeared world of the small and the tangible.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:21 (fourteen years ago)
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Friday, January 20, 2012 11:12 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is silly. the age of instant feedback and scrutiny hasn't stopped critics and bloggers from saying flowery, extravagant, ridiculous things all the fucking time, maybe not in much on music sites as on other kinds of sites but still. and "safe" as pejorative always makes me wonder what kind of "danger" someone is romanticizing, especially a fucking record review.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:24 (fourteen years ago)
the worst part abt pitchfork is how they express their ratings out to a tenth of a point, like is that really necessary
― lag∞n, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:26 (fourteen years ago)
and your mom would stick a pitchfork review right into daddy's inbox and dad would throw the garbage all across the floor as we would lay and learn what each decimal point was for
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
the phrase "the pre-internet-era film High Fidelity" really underlines how most of the lols and total lack of perspective in this article directly stem from the author's age
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
i had some ideas about this article but it seems painful to even type them into a box on the internet so i admire everyone elses fortitude
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:31 (fourteen years ago)
At the height of the Iraq war, college graduates poured into cities and took internships at magazines, nonprofits, and internet startup firms. They found themselves drawn, for some reason, to adorable music that openly celebrated our national heritage. They dressed like stylish lumberjacks and watched Sufjan perform dressed as a Boy Scout, and they remembered a disappeared world of the small and the tangible.
massive bullshit generalizations funneled into one specific reference so it'll ring "true".
― bnw, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:33 (fourteen years ago)
Those select few who did manage to hear everything—record store clerks, DJs, nerds with personal warehouses—could use this rare knowledge to terrorize their social or sexual betters, as in the pre-internet-era film High Fidelity. Napster made all of that obsolete.
fwiw the year High Fidelity came out i was downloading Kid A on Napster and discussing it on AIM with Ryan Schreiber so it's possibly i'm too close to all of this to have perspective myself, but seriously this is hilarious to me.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:34 (fourteen years ago)
In Sufjan Stevens, indie adopted precious, pastoral nationalism at the Bush Administration’s exact midpoint. In M.I.A., indie rock celebrated a musician whose greatest accomplishment has been to turn the world’s various catastrophes into remixed pop songs. This is a kind of music, in other words, that’s very good at avoiding uncomfortable conversations. Pitchfork has imitated, inspired, and encouraged indie rock in this respect. It has incorporated a perfect awareness of cultural capital into its basic architecture. A Pitchfork review may ignore history, aesthetics, or the basic technical aspects of tonal music, but it will almost never fail to include a detailed taxonomy of the current hype cycle and media environment.
this is key, as much as i want to defend MIA's catastrophe pop. it does a neat job of tying a good point about the basic structure of indie aesthetics (built in from its 80s-era roots) to the way indie tastemaking works online today, in a post-marginal commercial environment. carles uses HRO to make the same point over and over and over again.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:34 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, but come on, that's early adopter relative to what's going on today, and the culture depicted in high fidelity is clearly pre-internet (the author's point).
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:36 (fourteen years ago)
plus dudes BEEN straight lumberjackin it since nirvana broke!
― j., Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:38 (fourteen years ago)
no. i think it's extremely interesting to consider the commercial explosion of gentle, pastoral, nationalistic, nostalgic and overwhelmingly white indie pop in its larger national/political context. it's all but impossible to ignore the connections between 80s rural/small-town pop nationalism and reagan's "morning in america", so it doesn't absurd to draw similar connections wr2 the indie culture of the 00s.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:40 (fourteen years ago)
fwiw the year High Fidelity came out i was downloading Kid A on Napster and discussing it on AIM with Ryan Schreiber
(losing my edge joke)
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:40 (fourteen years ago)
RichBeck Richard Beck Now an assistant editor for @nplusonemag. That essay/story/thing that's been on your hard drive forever? Let me know about it!16 Dec Favorite Retweet Reply
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:41 (fourteen years ago)
grunge lumberjack shit = ragged, smelly, "i don't give a fuck"
subsequent indie lumberjackin = neat, retro-50s, expensive
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:41 (fourteen years ago)
is that so
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:44 (fourteen years ago)
I really don't think that indie lumberjackin was 'a thing' in the same sense that grunge was 'a thing'
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:45 (fourteen years ago)
closing paragraphs are total bullshit tho
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:46 (fourteen years ago)
like, sufjan stevens only exists as a datapoint cause dude can write some catchy melodies
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:46 (fourteen years ago)
smaller scale, yeah. filson gloves hitting a much smaller market segment than thrift store flannel.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:48 (fourteen years ago)
if sufjan stevens couldn't write catchy melodies would this 'indie lumberjack' generation be 'less of a thing'. was there a social demand for a indie lumberjack superstar and he stepped up to fill the role? no, I think that is absurd.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:49 (fourteen years ago)
I need to see numbers that prove that the indie lumberjack generation exists and it's not just like, idk, 3 bands that got big cause they wrote catchy melodies. I mean 'commercial explosion'? cmon.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:51 (fourteen years ago)
i don't think the fad of dudes living in brooklyn suddenly growing unruly beards should be confused with what happens in the rest of the world that is not brooklyn.
― j., Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:56 (fourteen years ago)
might there be something significant about the rapid cultural ascendancy of nostalgic, folksy, implicitly christian and comfortably middle-class white music that echoes the simplicities of childhood and mid-century american optimism in the wake of 9/11? doesn't seem so absurd to me.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:58 (fourteen years ago)
indie beards are probably the LAST thing i'd peg as an exclusively brooklyn phenomenon
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:59 (fourteen years ago)
'rapid cultural ascendancy'?? again, it's one dude, and he wrote a catchy indie pop album, it appealed to a lot of college kids at liberal arts schools or whatever. that's not a social movement that you can make any real statement about.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:02 (fourteen years ago)
if you guys want to seriously argue that the folksy, goodtimes campfire aesthetics/culture of fleet foxes, anco, grizzly bear, sufjan, and bon iver are not a thing of significance over the past decade or so, then have ats. it's not just brooklyn. it may just be liberal, educated, roughly middle-class city kids of a particular stripe, but that's hardly a "marginalized" group.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:02 (fourteen years ago)
again, it's one dude, and he wrote a catchy indie pop album, it appealed to a lot of college kids at liberal arts schools or whatever. that's not a social movement that you can make any real statement about.
i think that contempo-indie is a thing that one can make real and useful statements about. sufjan isn't a perfect synecdoche for that, but it's not like he has no relevance to the discussion.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:05 (fourteen years ago)
look, almost everyone I know is a middle-class college-educated city kids of a particularly stripe, and some of them probably listen to some of those artists sometimes.
it's not a. a particularly large listening demographic b. a 'movement' c. a trend w/ enough coherence that you can really make a statement about it. when you gotta use anco in your definition of 'pastoral nationalism' you know you're stretching things.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:09 (fourteen years ago)
particular stripe*
anco are only one of the links in the chain. pastoral yes, nationalist no. but they're not a perfect synecdoche, either. there is no perfect single-point representation.
and when we're specifically talking about a. pitchfork and b. indie music, then hell yeah, the demographic in question and the trends within it are worth making statements about. some of these bands have had #1 records in the last few years. they're as worth talking about as any music out there.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:15 (fourteen years ago)
sure they're worth talking about but when you're making big social statements you need big pieces of evidence and I don't think the small-scale success of a few bands is that evidence. maybe people liked 'my girls' cause it's a super catchy song not because of the american national political/context.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:20 (fourteen years ago)
sure, maybe...
the idea that post 2000 indie is in some sense marginal - outside the mainstream, not "worth" engaging in serious terms - strikes me as a weird kind of defensive denial. the neon bible debuted at #2, the suburbs at #1. national public radio (think about those words) has dedicated itself to the promulgation of this music to an audience that will someday assume leadership positions in american culture, business and government. this is the youthful soundtrack of white american privilege, and pretending that it's somehow not central to the narrative of the nation strikes me as bizarre.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:26 (fourteen years ago)
hey self, why the scarequotes on "worth"?
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:27 (fourteen years ago)
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 04:34 (37 minutes ago) Permalink
idk as a writer for pitchfork i cant say that the bulk of my writing deals w/ a 'detailed taxonomy of the current hype cycle and media environment' any more than is necessary to provide context of an existing discussion, and that's rarely the point of what i write
this piece, amongst other problems, has the same issue most pieces critical of the site has, in that it treats many different writers of many different styles approaches & eras as a monolith
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:31 (fourteen years ago)
― all shitley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, September 6, 2011
― buzza, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:32 (fourteen years ago)
the other thing is that his generalizations about who the audiences for indie are and how they've changed, while intuitively tempting, don't have any actual evidence to support them, which is really irresponsible writing
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:34 (fourteen years ago)
when you're making big social statements you need big pieces of evidence and I don't think the small-scale success of a few bands is that evidence.
i can't imagine what kind of evidence one might find that the popularity of an artist or genre is in some way related to national events. when it comes to speculation of this sort, proof isn't really what i'm looking for.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:35 (fourteen years ago)
his generalizations about who the audiences for indie are and how they've changed, while intuitively tempting, don't have any actual evidence to support them, which is really irresponsible writing
yeah, that i agree with 100%. frankly, i think the audience hasn't changed much. the difference is that the tastes and attitudes that define that audience have changed. but i don't have any strong support for that point, either.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:36 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think fleet foxes are central to the narrative of the nation. the youthful soundtrack of white american privilege is mostly kanye west and jay-z.
again this kinda analysis has no room for separating success that comes from tapping into ~the zeitgeist~ or whatever and success just for writing music that happens to appeal to a lot of people. arcade fire's music is pretty easy to appreciate, hey they won a grammy, really old people vote for teh grammys. so I guess they are big, and if there were lots of other hugely successful bands that sounded like them that might mean something. but with this limited datapoint no, there's just not enough evidence that this 'means something important'.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:37 (fourteen years ago)
I mean if you really wanted to make a solid argument you'd have to look at the numbers w/r/t 'white american privilege'. back in the day there was a facebook page that allowed you to see what the top bands were by undergrad college. the beatles were the top band for most ivy league schools. does that mean something about the future of white maerican privilege? I mean I guess it means *something* but it's not a movement, it's just a lot of people who like the beatles.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:41 (fourteen years ago)
also OTM. piece is waist-deep in unsupportable generalizations, especially as they pretend to specifically indict pitchfork. nevertheless, i agree with what i see as the author's buried point: trendspotting and the handicapping of cultural capital have become a much more visible component of the pop-critical conversation in the internet era (though again, i'd point more to carles and PRR more than pitchfork itself for evidence of this).
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:41 (fourteen years ago)
he wrote. “We reach more people right now than Spin or Vibe ever did, even if you use the bs print mag idea that ‘every copy is read by 2.5 people’ . . . hell, I should stop caring, get back to work, and let people keep underestimating us.” Then he posted two more times. Then he wrote, “Alright, I will get out of this thread.” Then he posted eighteen more times.
this was the best part of the article imo
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:42 (fourteen years ago)
back in the day there was a facebook page that allowed you to see what the top bands were by undergrad college. the beatles were the top band for most ivy league schools. does that mean something about the future of white maerican privilege? I mean I guess it means *something* but it's not a movement, it's just a lot of people who like the beatles.
i think it does mean something about the future/present/past of white american privilege. for one thing, it reflects the whiteness of white american privilege. for another, it reflects the durability of that culture's totems. i'd say that "pitchfork indie" is a clear extension of this.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:44 (fourteen years ago)
no. what do privileged white americans listen to that everybody else listens to, white or not, privileged or not? kanye and jay-Z, fine.
but what do privileged white americans listen to that other groups are substantially less likely to listen to? pitchfork indie. of course i don't have the statistics to back this up right at hand. just a hunch...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:47 (fourteen years ago)
that's my problem, this needs statistics
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:48 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think fleet foxes are central to the narrative of the nation.
is any music at all central to the narrative of the nation?
the youthful soundtrack of white american privilege is mostly kanye west and jay-z.
i don't think so.
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:48 (fourteen years ago)
haha otm
― 51 fewer calories (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:49 (fourteen years ago)
the thought of nice, earnest, young mr. beck reading hundred-plus post ilx thread derails kinda warms my heart.
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:51 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think so today.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:54 (fourteen years ago)
And I'm sure this is something we've discussed a bunch of times:
This has something to do with the site’s diligently cultivated readership: no genre’s fans are more vulnerable to music criticism than the educated, culturally anxious young people who pay close attention to indie rock.
like, i don't think this is indie-specific, i think this is educated, culturally anxious young people - specific.
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:56 (fourteen years ago)
i don't think it does. it's speculation, criticism, a shot across the bow. i read this sort of thing more for ideas than for ironclad proofs. if i felt that the author's assumptions were factually inaccurate in relation to statistical evidence that i might actually obtain, i might do some research myself. that's why god gave us google, after all.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 05:58 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, reflective of the myopic, self-damning tone you find in many attacks targeted against pitchfork and indie culture.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:04 (fourteen years ago)
feel bad for going all bonkers on this thread. can't help it sometimes. i get a feeling.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:13 (fourteen years ago)
http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/215868785/Twitter.jpg
i think he's cuet tbh
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:14 (fourteen years ago)
does help explain the passionate inconsistencies
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:26 (fourteen years ago)
this is all probably obvious but...
trendspotting and the handicapping of cultural capital have become a much more visible component of the pop-critical conversation in the internet era
i wonder if we couldn't look at sites like Pitchfork as evolving along with the rapid explosion of information about and availability of music (briefly mentioned in the article) and therefore these kinds of sites are a kind of "control technology" in the formal sense of that term. curating, handicapping, and value judgements become kind of urgently necessary when you are faced with the potential to listen to almost anything. without those kinds of bottlenecks (which are themselves proliferating) i think it'd almost be a chaos of choices. what's unique about pitchfork then would be what counts as information to them, what distinctions they find worth drawing, and the like, and not so much any relation to the music that pitchfork might stake out but in fact a relation to other forms of media and models of music consumption. criticism is always really talking to other criticism.
― ryan, Saturday, 21 January 2012 06:43 (fourteen years ago)
you know, the first half of this article's not bad as a primer for people who were aware of pitchfork but didn't really know what it was all about. would email to my mom!
6.8
― Lana Ballantine (latebloomer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 07:40 (fourteen years ago)
Pretty good article, although the first and last few paragraphs were a bit of a mess. I agree with a lot of contenderizer's points.
It does a good job of painting a picture of the transition through to the internet/file sharing era (c. 1998-2004), this was more interesting to me than anything he had to say about Pitchfork itself.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 21 January 2012 10:16 (fourteen years ago)
^^ That is exactly how I feel. The lead-in and end are shabby at best, but it's a very interesting article nonetheless. And I too agree with Contenderizers thoughts on it.
Missing Whiney here btw
― Another Wein bites the dust (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:21 (fourteen years ago)
For these people, indie rock has offered a way to ignore the fact that part of what makes your dead-end internship or bartending job tolerable is the fact that you can leave and go to law school whenever you like.
Apart from its wrongness, this is a disgraceful sentence.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:45 (fourteen years ago)
Reading through the archive, watching Pitchfork begin to discover thoughtful, politically liberal rap groups like A Tribe Called Quest and Jurassic 5, I felt a shock of white suburban recognition
like Jefferson discovering Montesquiou.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:49 (fourteen years ago)
whaaaaaaaaaaat
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:53 (fourteen years ago)
what on earth makes you think that NPR's audience "will someday assume leadership positions in american culture"??? NPR's audience is mostly rich baby boomers. they have already assumed "leadership positions in american culture"
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:54 (fourteen years ago)
dunno if that's right either, max. Many NPR listeners are in the boonies listening to the one affiliate in town.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:55 (fourteen years ago)
like, huh? is this dude familiar with "the art world"?
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:57 (fourteen years ago)
well my point is more about the idea that NPR listeners are in a position where they might someday assume something. im not sure what counts as a "leadership position in american culture" in any event
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 12:58 (fourteen years ago)
*thinks about the words national public radio*
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 13:00 (fourteen years ago)
argh sorry i dont actually want to have this conversation i just cant *deal* with tunnel vision people get when they talk about pitchfork
― max, Saturday, 21 January 2012 13:01 (fourteen years ago)
i think what the guy was saying, poorly, is that just like it was a big deal when Obama was not just the first black president but the first president who listens to hip hop, in 20 years or whatever we'll probably have our first President Tumblr White
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 13:26 (fourteen years ago)
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I, President Tumblr White, will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 14:44 (fourteen years ago)
Doesn't seem like music is really as important these days as it was in the past, so maybe this guy's writing from a false premise, because the points he makes are kinda whatever.
Some of the points he does make remind me of a NY Times Style Section article. "The people I hang out with are like this, so the world must be like this!" Fart-sniffing and navel gazing, basically.
― Spectrum, Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:14 (fourteen years ago)
"Tumblr white": ?Or is this a "if you have to ask..." sort of thing
― Scrutable (Ówen P.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:15 (fourteen years ago)
Doesn't seem like music is really as important these days as it was in the past,
Evidence?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:20 (fourteen years ago)
ex: hippie movement in the 60s, punk movement in the 70s, and the general rush of new types of music appearing in a small period of time. Things aren't like that anymore, and expecting it to be like that is applying past standards to the present.
Just seems like there's still this shadow of music's importance hanging over our culture when it doesn't really exist anymore. Like, music "should" be important, but ... it's just not, at least in my opinion. and I love music.
― Spectrum, Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:28 (fourteen years ago)
― Scrutable (Ówen P.), Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:15 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
a white guy with a tumblr used this phrase as an insult on ilx a bunch of times recently
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
I like it, sounds like "Hustler White" + when you tumble dry your whites.I'd just never heard it before last week
― Scrutable (Ówen P.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:31 (fourteen years ago)
One way to gauge this, albeit anecdotally, is what concert tickets would be accepted gratis by the broadest, largest strata of people? I'd suggest, beyond the usual Macca and whatnot, that someone like Gaga wins this, a top 40 act whose presence extends beyond the charts and into many peripheral facets of society. Like, my parents know who Lady Gaga is, probably. They've never heard of the Arcade Fire.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:35 (fourteen years ago)
i think the author was referring to the very real phenomenon of young whatevers, presumably eventually to make up a lot of the upper ends of the managerial class, leadership class, creative class, etc. (and probably already in careers in those classes), listening to npr 'indie' stations, reading about chicago juke and cascadian black metal on the npr website, etc.
― j., Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:08 (fourteen years ago)
this week i was working with a johns hopkins grad student who was really excited about going to see big freedia at a local hipster restaurant/venue
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:38 (fourteen years ago)
i'm gonna troll hard here, so forgive me...
my argument is that the interests of young, white, educated, "not poor", city-dwelling people are central to the narrative of the nation - whether or not those interests are broadly popular. broad popularity is beside the point. the tastes of the ruling class are not generally reflected in the tastes of population at large, after all. the ruling class typically takes a certain pride in enjoying exclusive, elevated, specialized taste.
the segment of the ruling class i'm talking about skews liberal if we're talking about indie rock, NPR and (god help me) pitchfork. and sure, i'm using the phrase "ruling class" in a loose and confrontational manner. arcade fire fans aren't necessarily rich or white or whatever. but indie rock is the voice of a specific culture, and that culture is largely white and hardly "poor and disenfranchised". the privileged, educated, culturally-engaged white audience that indie rock enjoys is hard to clearly distinguish from the writers/thinkers who construct the official record of our nation's cultural doings (i.e., critics and pundits). to say nothing of the fact that a not unrelated demographic typically winds up in charge of corporate and political america. given the organization of power in america, this makes indie rock culturally important, regardless of how much more enthnically and culturally diverse america's power masters may be now than they were in the past (not all that much, really).
indie likes to pretend that this is not true. it pretends that it is marginal and rankles when it is described as "white" or "privileged". it is clearly both those things. there is nothing wrong with this, but privilege is famously hostile to the discussion of privilege. the wealthy don't like it when you talk about money.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:41 (fourteen years ago)
well, tbf, at this point i'm talking more about the relationship of indie rock to a culture of white privilege than pitchfork per se.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:49 (fourteen years ago)
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, January 21, 2012 1:04 AM (11 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, January 21, 2012 1:13 AM (11 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
you already ethered yourself here fyi
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)
and i guess i shouldn't use the "indie rock" construction. at this point, indie culture has moved well beyond rock and even music.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:52 (fourteen years ago)
I know people from all walks of life who like indie: people who grew up in poverty trying to make it, trustfund art kids, aspiring yuppies, etc. The only thing they have in common is that they like music and have an internet connection, and from what I've gleaned from them, they don't consider the music they listen to represent "where they come from, maaan", or where they want to go. It's stuff to enjoy from time to time, like a movie.
Associating music with cultural subgroups implies that it's closely related to those groups, which would make total sense in the past if one of the only ways to find out about that music were through people of similar class to yourself that you'd find yourself hanging out with, but with the internet that's not necessary anymore. So I don't think it says all that much.
― Spectrum, Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
horseshit. i'm white and middle-class. i'm also pretty indie. so what? i'm not "damning" anything or anyone. i'm not operation from a position of defensive shame. i'm simply talking in a dispassionate manner about the relationship of white privilege to power and cultural centrality in america - and speculating about the relationship of my own indie culture to all that.
this should hardly be off-limits, unless you're actively interested in patrolling the "rich people don't like it when you talk about money" boundaries of the discussion.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, and hip hop has nothing to do with race. i wonder if this point would be so contentious if i were talking about country music? it's as white as indie, but a good deal less flagrantly urban/educated/middle & upper class.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
i just meant that in a "'Alright, I will get out of this thread.' Then he posted eighteen more times." way
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
"operation" = "operating" in that xpost
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:00 (fourteen years ago)
Hip hop's a totally different thing. You can make the same argument with 70s working class butt rock v. soul music. Don't think it really applies here since it's a different issue entirely, unless you want to expand the argument to "why do black people like rap, and white people like rock?", which totally escapes the scope of this debate.
― Spectrum, Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:01 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=they+keep+pulling+me+back+in&um=1&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&sa=N&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1600&bih=817&tbm=isch&tbnid=wiHaOuXLsmROtM:&imgrefurl=http://jeffreypease.com/blog/&docid=sWEtT7WdR4JvMM&imgurl=http://jeffreypease.com/wp-content/uploads/godfather.jpg&w=265&h=255&ei=Yv0aT9TzIqOXiQKHseXZCA&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=1244&vpy=155&dur=1553&hovh=204&hovw=212&tx=87&ty=111&sig=103386430707884351249&page=1&tbnh=149&tbnw=152&start=0&ndsp=31&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:02 (fourteen years ago)
supposed to be a picture of michael corleone there, but w/e
i don't think any of this escapes the scope of the debate. and the comparison i'd make is not to "70s working class buttrock", but to stuff like john lennon, simon and garfunkel, paul simon, steely dan and yes. they're the 70s equivalent of NPR indie WR2 the cultural demographics. i mean, i'm not asking why privileged white people listen to certain kinds of music, i'm merely observing that they do.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:06 (fourteen years ago)
probably should throw joni mitchell into that list up there, along with the eagles, CSN/Y, neil young, etc.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
Wuh? You totally missed the points I made, plus making assumptions out of thin air, so not sure where to go from here. ;(
― Spectrum, Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
the funny thing about all this is that the voice of privileged white america skews so radically liberal, when privileged white liberals like to think of "the ruling class" as intrinsically conservative. unfortunately, there isn't much explicitly conservative upscale white pop out there. as a result, the soundtrack of white american privilege necessarily skews liberal, making liberal white musicians sort of the court jesters of american political, cultural and economic power. liberal whites get to pretend that this isn't true, that their beards and guitars signify opposition to the structures of power, because one of america's dominant cultural myths is that ostensible political positioning is more important than wealth, class and/or ethnicity.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
no idea what is happening to contenderizer right now
― Whiney vs. (BradNelson), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)
well, help me out, spec. i'm not sure what points i missed :(
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:18 (fourteen years ago)
xpost -- It's...bizarrely fascinating.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:19 (fourteen years ago)
um, i'm trying to explicitly politicize and racialize a discussion indie culture. around here, that = trying to create a clusterfuck, i guess...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:19 (fourteen years ago)
meltdown
― Another Wein bites the dust (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
http://cache2.artprintimages.com/p/LRG/37/3710/K3YAF00Z/art-print/conrad-knutsen-enjoy-the-show.jpg
― omar little, Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
again, all apologies. i know that the arguments i'm trying to make aren't popular hereabouts. i don't mean any offense.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:23 (fourteen years ago)
fwiw, i could easily poke holes in my own argument here. indie culture isn't a single, monolithic thing, nor is "white privilege". political positioning does matter. the voice of emerging (cutting edge or w/e) arts culture is overwhelming liberal, while conservative engagement with the arts tends, unsurprisingly, to be more backwards-looking, tradition-preserving. this suggests that the ostensible liberalism of white arts culture really is genuinely and functional a liberal/progressive voice, and there's plenty of real-world evidence to back that up.
i admit that i pushed too hard into simple trolling when i suggested otherwise. like i said, i get carried away...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:34 (fourteen years ago)
dude the reactions you are getting here are TOTALLY not about you drawing unfashionable conclusions.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:39 (fourteen years ago)
it's more about that fact that i'm compulsively posting crack-brained nonsense? yeah, that's a possibility.
maybe liveblogging my reactions to a think piece wasn't the best idea...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:42 (fourteen years ago)
ZYPHEREAL: sorry for bloggingZYPHEREAL: i think the bloods n gs will b poisoned if i am not in solitudeZYPHEREAL: i need to be silent
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 18:45 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vI0UcUxzrQ
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:06 (fourteen years ago)
Instead of striking out in pursuit of new musical forms, they tweaked or remixed the sounds of earlier music, secure in the knowledge that pedantic blog writers would magnify these changes and make them seem daring.
I would kiss any group that actually thinks like this. "Dude, this shit ain't next level." "Relax, the bloggers have our backs..."
― da croupier, Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:07 (fourteen years ago)
get ready to receive some hipster kisses, vampire weekend!
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
Ezra Koenig has a plan, the pedantic blog writers his pawns.
― da croupier, Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:11 (fourteen years ago)
http://themorningafterpills.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ezra-koenig.jpg
"This blog's grown old and rusty..."
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:12 (fourteen years ago)
kinda figured that dropping that link in here would be a hand grenade
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:24 (fourteen years ago)
tumblr woot
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
thread really does miss whiney
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:27 (fourteen years ago)
I think its fair to say that indie has the patina of ruling class elites, its just music though
And I do disagree with the idea that music was more central to ppl's stories in the past, I think music critics were less aware of the multitude of musical styles going on then, or less concerned with covering them
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
Or really, their were fewer critics and journalists so a smaller range of music was covered
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:29 (fourteen years ago)
Dunno if people talked about this, but although the article is pretty fuckin idiotic, its really not that horrible, and the only inexcusable thing in it I think is disparaging allmusic at the bottom.
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:33 (fourteen years ago)
I haven't read pitchfork in a year or two and look up shit on allmusic all the time.
karlrovi
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:34 (fourteen years ago)
i think where contenderizer & i differ is that the 'music for the leaders of tomorrow' is an argument imo that one should be careful not to put it central to the narrative, not an argument in FAVOR of doing that, but that's why i always disagree w/ contenderizer about everything, i think he's a secret fascist
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:43 (fourteen years ago)
it's interesting to think that even though indie rock isn't the most popular music in america, Juno/Pitchfork/ArcadeFire might be the "most dominantly remembered aesthetic" when we look back at the '00s in 20 years.
Like the same way Woodstock/love generation represents the 60s in funny car commercials, mainly since the upwardly mobile/creative class teens that absorbed it back then grew up to give advertising/media/movies that narrative. People forget 1969 also had Black Sabbath, James Brown, the Mc5, Marvin Gaye, Barbara Streisand, Johnny Cash, Merle Haggard.... But when kids dress up for Homecoming week on "60s day," everyone dresses like a hippie. http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)
say what up to u banned and dem
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
"this piece, amongst other problems, has the same issue most pieces critical of the site has, in that it treats many different writers of many different styles approaches & eras as a monolith"
To be fair, doesn't the site itself do this to an extent?
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:51 (fourteen years ago)
it is pretty dehumanizing the way none of the writers get their own special font
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:55 (fourteen years ago)
add "present the writing staff under a united editorial font" to "rates records on scale of 1 to 10" and "does year-end lists" in the growing pile of things magazines have done for decades that '90s babies think Pitchfork invented
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:57 (fourteen years ago)
although it is kind of hilarious how easy it would be to take most of the things itt thread and just replace every mention of "Pitchfork" to "Rolling Stone" and dial all the other band names and cultural signifiers back about 3 decades
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 19:59 (fourteen years ago)
^ yup
that's why i always disagree w/ contenderizer about everything, i think he's a secret fascist
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, January 21, 2012 11:43 AM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this comes through, by the way. i've always been a bit mystified by it, because i try really fucking hard to keep my fascism under wraps.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:04 (fourteen years ago)
contenderizer, can you readjust your estimated percentage on how much of this article is OTM now that you've OTM'd basically every critique of it levied in this thread
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:07 (fourteen years ago)
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:08 (fourteen years ago)
okay, like 9.7. which would be a damn good score on pitchfork. BNC.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:11 (fourteen years ago)
Like the same way Woodstock/love generation represents the 60s in funny car commercials, mainly since the upwardly mobile/creative class teens that absorbed it back then grew up to give advertising/media/movies that narrative. People forget 1969 also had Black Sabbath, James Brown, the Mc5, Marvin Gaye, Barbara Streisand, Johnny Cash, Merle Haggard.... But when kids dress up for Homecoming week on "60s day," everyone dresses like a hippie.
― dave cool, Saturday, January 21, 2012 1:47 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah this i agree
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
i dressed up as Marvin Gaye, honestly
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:13 (fourteen years ago)
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, January 21, 2012 2:04 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
bracketing your contention that indie is the music of the leaders of tomorrow -- let's assume this is correct for the sake of argument -- you don't find it at all troublesome that for you, this means that these people's tastes are somehow more worthy of coverage & narrative centrality than people of lower economic standing
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:14 (fourteen years ago)
basically, i think it's an interesting, thought-provoking piece that makes some good points and connects some important (if obvious) dots - but also that it's poorly organized, unfocused and somewhat irresponsible.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:15 (fourteen years ago)
i dunno i imagine that the music-themed costumes at "00's retro parties" in 2030 or whatever will be more likely to dress like Kanye or Gaga or Britney than members of Arcade Fire or The Strokes
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:16 (fourteen years ago)
when ppl go to 60s parties, they dont dress like the cover of Sgt Peppers or Arthur Lee, they dress like generic "hippies" http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
i think they'd be more likely to dress like wiz khalifa than kanye, if we're talking about rapper fashionz
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
noone in america will be able to fit into wiz khalifa's clothes by 2030 though
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:18 (fourteen years ago)
also kanye was actually famous in the '00s
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
i went to a "90s party" recently and literally everyone took their cues from extras in Singles. That's just the way it is, no hornsby. http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
Also (from way upthread): "I think it's an ongoing habit of a lot of people to look at things like pop music, and pop music press/criticism, and have this furious epiphany that it, let's say, "merely supports an existing consumer culture" -- as opposed, I guess, to being a bold, radical, revolutionary critique -- which to me is the biggest, strangest DUH thing in the universe. It's called POPULAR music! It exists in a space that's sort of between being a entertainment product and being fine art! This is a lot of what makes it great and interesting and gives it the potential to be really fascinating! What's maybe been harder for people to wrap their heads around is the idea that pop writing exists in a similar space between, you know, consumer/entertainment reporting and really seriously committed criticism. (And the market is mostly for the former of those two things.)"
This gets at something I actually miss about the old Pitchfork, for all its flaws and "embarrassing" reviews: I sense that the n+1 guy and I would agree that criticism is at its most dull and its most insidious when it occupies this perfect middle space between consumer reporting and serious criticism. One thing I loved and valued about ILM in the early days was its prizing of the individual's response to music, its dogged insistence on the essential subjectivity of the listening experience. Criticism that pretends toward objectivity ignores these things, and I would always (and I sense I'm not alone here) rather read the highly opinionated, unafraid-to-be-ridiculous, risk-taking writing of a strong-voiced individual than the carefully calculated, restrained, compendium-style "reporting" of a typical Pitchfork review these days.
x-post: And the same goes for the Rolling Stone of three decades ago! I'm in my thirties and don't pretend that Pitchfork invented the unified editorial front, it just saddens me to see something that was once infuriating in an invigorating way having turned into something just like the old magazines it once felt like a fresh "internet-era" alternative to.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
dave coulier the reason people at retro parties you've been to dress like rock stars and not like gold chain-wearing rappers or afro'd soul singers is because you'd be talking about how racist they are if it was the latter case
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:22 (fourteen years ago)
how did kanye dress? i don't think anyone is going to dress like the famous picture
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)
dave coulier http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― Another Wein bites the dust (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)
The #1 song of 1969 was "Sugar Sugar." Doesn't anyone dress like the Archies at these things?
― Let A Man Come In And Do The Cop Porn (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
you don't find it at all troublesome that for you, this means that these people's tastes are somehow more worthy of coverage & narrative centrality than people of lower economic standing
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, January 21, 2012 12:14 PM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i wouldn't use the word "worthy". i think it's unsurprising that privileged white kids listen to and write about music made by privileged white kids (speaking very generally here - i'm aware that there are countless counter-examples). i'm intentionally refraining from passing any kind of judgment on this tendency.
personally, i think it's unsurprising that any group self-defines and chooses to value their own cultural products. of course, this becomes hugely problematic when we expand our consideration of this tendency to include conflicts between different cultural groups, especially when one cultural group is culturally/politically/economically dominant.
i prefer, however, to maintain a clear conceptual line between the issues under consideration here. there's nothing intrinsically "wrong" with privileged white kids listening to and writing about privileged white music (or with any group being especially interested in its own cultural doings). that said, to the extent that we conceive of ourselves as working in opposition to the social structures that perpetuate white privilege and power, we might critique or even oppose this tendency for purely pragmatic reasons.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
i hope i don't come across upset, but i just said three times that every retro party/event i've been too, people dress like generic music fans not actual musicians. some dude, et al, i'm sorry if i didn;t make myself clearer. Sometimes I type too fast! http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
no i know that was what you were mainly saying, i was just going back to your original point of people dressing like hippies instead of marvin gaye types or whatever
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
i've never been to a '90s party' but i'd be surprised if there were no hammer pants though!
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
xxps to contenderizer, who said anything about whether or not its 'surprising' -- these things arent set in stone and basing taste on arbitrary biological myths like 'race' is a fairly arbitrary, constructed one
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
guys i think we're about to see what happens when 2 people try to filibuster each other at the same time
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:31 (fourteen years ago)
OTM. one of the points made in the n+1 piece that i most strongly agree with. tried to say something similar upthread.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:33 (fourteen years ago)
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, January 21, 2012 2:26 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
why are you putting it in terms of 'right' or 'wrong'? who said anything about that? we're talking about how these artists are covered and you said that you thought it made sense that the music of the privileged class would be central. I disagree, i don't think that's a 'natural state of things' and that if the privileged class is in any way educated they should recognize the inherent myopia of that perspective
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:34 (fourteen years ago)
its fine that people listen to whatever is in their immediate vicinity. it's not fine that people who have a responsibility as journalists to cover music are unaware that this is what their default setting might be
these things arent set in stone and basing taste on arbitrary biological myths like 'race' is a fairly arbitrary, constructed one
agree completely. to that extent, we're on the same page.
[/filibuster]
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
it's not fine that people who have a responsibility as journalists to cover music are unaware that this is what their default setting might be
agree with that, too. i'd even go farther, to suggest that what often passes for "unawareness" might be defensive denial. that's why i'm inclined to call the white & privileged nature of indie culture on its demographics and implications.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)
One thing I loved and valued about ILM in the early days was its prizing of the individual's response to music, its dogged insistence on the essential subjectivity of the listening experience. Criticism that pretends toward objectivity ignores these things
gtfo
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:38 (fourteen years ago)
Just noticed this comment, some dude: "the age of instant feedback and scrutiny hasn't stopped critics and bloggers from saying flowery, extravagant, ridiculous things all the fucking time, maybe not in much on music sites as on other kinds of sites but still. and "safe" as pejorative always makes me wonder what kind of "danger" someone is romanticizing, especially a fucking record review."
Why shouldn't people say these "flowery, extravagant, ridiculous" things? Nobody is romanticizing actual "danger," they most likely just want to feel the person behind the critical mask when they read record reviews. Also, thinking of something as just "a fucking record review" feels, I don't know, somehow disrespectful of the form.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:39 (fourteen years ago)
go read a blog
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:40 (fourteen years ago)
GRAB
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:41 (fourteen years ago)
"One thing I loved and valued about ILM in the early days was its prizing of the individual's response to music, its dogged insistence on the essential subjectivity of the listening experience. Criticism that pretends toward objectivity ignores these things"
do you really think that current pitchfork 'pretends toward objectivity'?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
I suspect a few readers will be confused by the writer's use of "consumer guide" -- like consumer guides are supposed to be objective or something.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:45 (fourteen years ago)
no, not at all. but relative to the bang-style vomiting of undigested thought that some still romanticize (and relative, too, to the endearingly eccentric pfork reviews of yesteryear), the current pfork house style does tend to a dry, authoritative, professional tone. it sometimes strikes me as defensive, as though critical stances are chosen and reviews written so as not to be mocked online as much as anything else. that's probably unfair, though. it's probably just ambitious professionals trying to do their job in a professional manner.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:53 (fourteen years ago)
lol "bang-style"
bangs-style
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 20:54 (fourteen years ago)
"do you really think that current pitchfork 'pretends toward objectivity'?"
I honestly haven't read it with any regularity in years, aside from the review here and there of a record I really care about, or the individual columns by guys like Mark Richardson, Nitsuh, Tom, etc., which I really love. The spark is gone for me. It's hard to articulate... The reviews just feel so much more restrained, more professional, more composed, more smoothed-out, afraid to shock or to be bold or ridiculous. It feels like criticism that's afraid to really go out on a limb for fear of getting called out or made fun of. Also, the way Pitchfork covers so many genres now feels like it should to be exciting for its broad-mindedness, but it actually comes across to me as numbing--and maybe that's what I mean by "pretends toward objectivity"... It's almost like those early-ILM pop-ist tendencies have ossified into just another critical stance--broad-mindedness as orthodoxy rather than as the gumption to say "fuck you and your rockism, I like this song."
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:00 (fourteen years ago)
so your review of current-day Pitchfork would be less "5.4" and more "monkey peeing into its own mouth"
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:01 (fourteen years ago)
"that's probably unfair, though. it's probably just ambitious professionals trying to do their job in a professional manner."
This sounds like Steely Dan without Fagan and Becker...
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
lol some dude
― Neanderthal, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:08 (fourteen years ago)
"I suspect a few readers will be confused by the writer's use of "consumer guide" -- like consumer guides are supposed to be objective or something."
How are they not supposed to be objective? I mean, the very framing of something as a "guide" seems to me to heavily suggest that we as the audience are supposed to see it as presenting things in a fairly objective manner.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:10 (fourteen years ago)
for me the most contentious point scottpl made in that whole p&j thread rant was the very confident assertion that PF already covers everything non-indie that's remotely worth covering ("What don't we cover that is so great in the real world? Is it John Mayer? Is it BEP? What are we missing that is so good that appeals to 'the real world'?"), that was the only thing that really struck me as hubris.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:10 (fourteen years ago)
To clarify, we all know that an individual record review is not actually objective and can never be, but can we agree that a collection of reviews presented in a certain way ("unified editorial front"-style) feels like it's trying to be taken as more objective than not?
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:16 (fourteen years ago)
sure, sure. but it's the kind of 'illusion' that most people knowingly consent to not quibbling over without necessarily buying into, like when movie dialogue is more articulate or expository than the way people really talk.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:19 (fourteen years ago)
no!
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:20 (fourteen years ago)
Human beings with prejudices assemble consumer guides. Some of them have brains.
I work in wine, and the oft-maligned but hugely popular Wine Spectator is similar to P-fork in a lot of ways: 100-point scale, many different reviewers, columns on specific topics, etc. Wine is something that is emotionally and aesthetically resonant to a ton of people, and to see these responses in the form of numerical scores with dry, adjective-heavy, authoritative writing to accompany them is both stultifying and infuriating--it comes across as dishonest. We all know that each score/review represents a radically subjective point of view; the trouble is, when the writer masks that subjectivity, it actually becomes *less* useful to us as consumers. If I know a person's biases--if they're honest and vivid in their visceral aesthetic responses to things--I can understand their reviews and writings as representing a unique individual, one to whom I have the ability to compare my own self and my own quirks and predilections. If I feel like I'm being written to as "Joe Average Consumer" from some vantage point of calculated, faux-objective professionalism, I recoil. That goes for wine writing and music criticism alike.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:23 (fourteen years ago)
Imagine 1997-era PFM reviewing wine.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:24 (fourteen years ago)
at every 90s-themed party ive been to most ppl either dressed like the fresh prince or the cast of friends ca. 1997
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:26 (fourteen years ago)
"Human beings with prejudices assemble consumer guides. Some of them have brains."
Sotosyn, I realize this, I do. I just don't listen to music as a "consumer," and I tend not to like writing that takes as its intended audience those who listen as "consumers." I realize this is a personal preference, and I do see the value in writing that tries merely to point people toward things they might like to investigate/purchase. I just wish that sort of writing didn't so often take on a dry, impersonal tone.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:29 (fourteen years ago)
when the writer masks that subjectivity
i don't agree that this is what is happening
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:29 (fourteen years ago)
"Imagine 1997-era PFM reviewing wine."
Haha, that's frightening... But I actually wish there were more people writing irresponsibly inflammatorily about wine! People play it too safe.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:30 (fourteen years ago)
I really want to know what kinds of parties you people hit and if it's okay to wear a Cliff Huxtable sweater.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:30 (fourteen years ago)
i think you're treating juvenile knee jerk writing as if it has some larger or more resonant truth to it but really its just poorly articulated
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:30 (fourteen years ago)
how can you hide subjectivity? It's like hiding my dick.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:31 (fourteen years ago)
It always amuses me to try to think of my own writing as part of a "unified editorial front" with some of the other writers when I think of our styles and tastes as so fundamentally different. But then I guess the people who write long think pieces about pitchfork are probably not reading any of my (or many of, say, deej or j0rdan's) pieces - no surprise that if you're only reading the reviews of the big X indie albums of the year then they're gonna sound the same - and in fact were probably all written by about 5 of the writing staff.
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:32 (fourteen years ago)
xpost alfred don't worry, you're really, really, subjective.
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)
once i dj'd an amer1c4n app4r3l party that was 90s themed and someone was wearing hammer pants i was p impressed
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:34 (fourteen years ago)
this is gonna be the thread where i brag abt things that are actually deeply shameful
then ill apply to law school
"i don't agree that this is what is happening"
My initial phrasing wasn't well-put, and it worked against my larger point: I don't mean so much that the writers themselves mask that subjectivity (they embody it, necessarily), but that the larger scope of P-fork has resulted in the feeling that that subjectivity, which should be prized in my opinion, is underplayed and backgrounded. I connect with individual writers, not with the POV (whether carefully curated or accidental) of a magazine.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:34 (fourteen years ago)
this article was good because it was like a greatest hits of p4k's early years
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)
missin u brett D, or was his name brent D:
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
My 21st was an early 90s party. I went as the dark haired guy from East-17 in the "It's Alright" video clip. My housemates came as Salt & Pepa. Most convincing costume was the guy who came as Brandon from 90210 - at first we thought he hadn't come in costume but had bad taste in clothes/hair. </shame-bragging>
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:37 (fourteen years ago)
Always the risk of retro parties.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:41 (fourteen years ago)
"It always amuses me to try to think of my own writing as part of a "unified editorial front" with some of the other writers when I think of our styles and tastes as so fundamentally different."
But I'd wager, Tim, that most people who follow and are influenced by P-fork's reviews don't think of individual writers as much as they should... Drawing my earlier wine analogy, people say "Wine Spectator gave this Burgundy 96 points!"--they don't say "Matt Kramer gave this wine 96 points!" even though the latter is precisely what happened. It's the way each individual (and yes, subjective--necessarily--I really don't want to flog that corpse any more) reviewer's voice gets subsumed into the larger whole of "Pitchfork's stance on this record" that I'm lamenting, I suppose.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:50 (fourteen years ago)
90s parties are a thing? how old are these people having 90s parties?
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
90
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
This is an important point, but I'd argue that it's always been the case. And for most music magazines, it's been a self-fulfilling prophecy: Creem and Rolling Stone weren't necessarily going to agree on everything, nor are Down Beat and Cadence (or the late, lamented Coda), and the reviewers and editorial staff actively promote those differences (despite inevitable overlap in reviewers) in the interest of creating what appeared to be an overall stance. It's definitely unfair in the sense that Rolling Stone might have panned early Black Sabbath, but Dave Marsh loved them.
I don't really have a horse in the Pitchfork race, but the handful of times I've gone to the site it struck me as just another clearinghouse of professional reviews -- skillfully written to be sure, and sometimes very incisive -- but the distinctions, as far as I could see, were in how the site marketed/presented itself, rather than any particular stance(s) it took.
― Let A Man Come In And Do The Cop Porn (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, January 21, 2012 4:34 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i already have several times though! join the party!
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:16 (fourteen years ago)
again before you can really say anything you need:
a. clear and precise definition of 'indie music/culture' b. clear and precise definition of 'white privileged elite' c. real evidence that that music is actually the most listened to music among white privileged elite
I'm fairly sure c doesn't exist. (I'm not sure a exists either.)
and even if c did exist, I don't think it would matter, because whatever indie culture is, it's substantially less politicized than 60s era hippie culture/punk/hip hop/grunge. what does it 'mean' that lots of people at harvard like bon iver and sufjan? I don't think it means much until they you prove that they listen to them more than they listen to the beatles and jay-z (I'd put money on this being false), that there's some sorta important ethos that bon iver and sufjan share (I don't see one), and that the margin that people at harvard like them more than 'replacement value music' is meaningfully higher than the margin that white non-elites prefer or don't prefer this music to other music.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)
my overall pov is that music isn't very 'important' today, at least not for privileged white people but probably not for other demographics too
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
it's not Important like it was for sixties youth but it's important now insofar as it's a fungible consumer good like earrings, iPads, cars, and so on.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:23 (fourteen years ago)
actually I take that back, ime by far the most important form of music today is the 20 person drum circle, as it played a prominent role in OWS
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:23 (fourteen years ago)
totally agree w/ you alfred
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:24 (fourteen years ago)
you gotta celebrate yr acceptance to harvard law somehow amirite??
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
My point is that people say "oh the writing is so stilted and faux-objective and anonymous and branded now" and then when you ask "is it, really?" they say (or imply) "well of course I wasn't really thinking about any of the writing as being the product of an individual writer, in fact I wasn't really thinking about the writing at all really, just the way Pitchfork in general is perceived nowadays."
At that point we're not really talking about the writing itself and should admit as much. I fully admit that people think about Pitchfork in the way that you say, but that doesn't mean that the individual writers necessarily are writing in a manner so as to facilitate that - most of it comes from the "framing" (the de-emphasis of by-lines, the BNMs, the end of year lists etc.).
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
But I'd wager, Tim, that most people who follow and are influenced by P-fork's reviews don't think of individual writers as much as they should...
pfork's overall editorial approach doesn't seem to encourage this. i don't mean to slight anyone, but it seems to me that at the moment, there is no lester bangs of pitchfork, no greil marcus, byron coley or chuck klosterman: no one who intentionally pushes an idiosyncratic, strongly personal authorial voice and point of view to the fore in their writing. instead, most of pitchfork's current writers seem to be shooting for something like the NYT house style. it's not like there's no personality at all, but the tendency is to the dry and professionally dispassionate - subjectivity given the voice of objectivity. this remains true whether the music being written about is rock, pop, hip hop, noise or whatever.
there's nothing wrong with this. i love cook's illustrated and the NYT, and they generally adopt a similar tone. personally, when it comes to art criticism, i prefer something a bit more wild & wooly, but that's just a matter of taste. i very much admire the knowledge, insight and skill of pitchfork's better writers.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:27 (fourteen years ago)
r.i.p. ethan p
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:28 (fourteen years ago)
Sotosyn, that is so cynical! I still think music is hugely important to people, that it resonates on an individual level, that it inspires and infuriates... I can't imagine that not being the case. Just because it's handled in the prominent media as just another fungible consumer good doesn't mean it's actually been reduced to that in the larger consumer culture.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:28 (fourteen years ago)
I'd wager that most people who read record reviews for the author are writers themselves. Everyone else doesn't get beyond the number/grade/star rating, etc.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:29 (fourteen years ago)
i think we should probably all acknowledge that fact that everyone w/ 'opinions' abt p4k isnt reading w/e 2chaniz and dawn richard reviews and never intends to
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:29 (fourteen years ago)
"My point is that people say "oh the writing is so stilted and faux-objective and anonymous and branded now" and then when you ask "is it, really?" they say (or imply) "well of course I wasn't really thinking about any of the writing as being the product of an individual writer, in fact I wasn't really thinking about the writing at all really, just the way Pitchfork in general is perceived nowadays."
At that point we're not really talking about the writing itself and should admit as much. I fully admit that people think about Pitchfork in the way that you say, but that doesn't mean that the individual writers necessarily are writing in a manner so as to facilitate that - most of it comes from the "framing" (the de-emphasis of by-lines, the BNMs, the end of year lists etc.)."
This makes a lot of sense, Tim; I agree completely. I like many of the writers who write for P-fork, but I dislike the overall vibe of the site, the framing of which you speak.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)
the supposed de-emphasis of bylines is something else i'm gonna call bullshit on. do other publications put the writer's name in much bigger type? at the top AND bottom of the review?
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:32 (fourteen years ago)
just went to p4k.com and was pleased to see BIG PERP's byline prominently featured
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:33 (fourteen years ago)
a lot of publications only credit staff writers by their INITIALS for short pieces and list entries, pitchfork has never done that!! (xpost)
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:34 (fourteen years ago)
pfork's overall editorial approach doesn't seem to encourage this. i don't mean to slight anyone, but it seems to me that at the moment, there is no lester bangs of pitchfork, no greil marcus, byron coley or chuck klosterman: no one who intentionally pushes an idiosyncratic, strongly personal authorial voice and point of view to the fore in their writing.
It's a very personal opinion of mine obv but I think Tom's column was this. But the people who want a "lester bangs of pitchfork" wouldn't be able to recognise as much in a million years.
no that's right - I'm talking more about the "idea" of this.
At any rate some of my favourite ever (capsule) review writing was in The Face which IIRC never even identified the writers in their review columns.
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:34 (fourteen years ago)
Following up on that, Tim, probably the biggest flaw and most flagrant rhetorical foul of that n+1 piece is the seeming conflation of the writing itself and the framing of it in the piece's final thoughts... And I admit that my initial comments suggested that conflation as well. Still, is that sort of framing simply something we have to accept or overlook? And what does it mean to be an individual writer who writes (well and engagingly) within that larger framing?
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:35 (fourteen years ago)
i kind of think it's crazy that Ian Cohen isn't a 'name' to anyone who reads the site regularly tbh -- his stuff always stands out and is obviously his from the first paragraph if you haven't looked at the byline when you start reading. to me he's as much a standout personality as Brent D. was in the old days (except not in an embarrassing way like he was.
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:36 (fourteen years ago)
It's a very personal opinion of mine obv but I think Tom's column was this. But the people who want a "lester bangs of pitchfork" wouldn't be able to recognise as much in a million years."
I also love Tom's writing for the site, as I mentioned above. Those columns I find to be the most compelling and valuable part of P-fork right now. I wonder how many people really dig into them, though, and how many just check to see which records got reviewed today and how many of the year's top 100 records they've downloaded yet. I really feel that P-fork might just be too broad, too big, with too many features.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
i kind of think it's crazy that Ian Cohen isn't a 'name' to anyone who reads the site regularly tbh
haha the dude who wrote the n+1 piece p clearly hasnt been a 'regular reader' of p4k since like 06 at the latest
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:40 (fourteen years ago)
most flagrant rhetorical foul of that n+1 piece is the seeming conflation of the writing itself and the framing of it in the piece's final thoughts... And I admit that my initial comments suggested that conflation as well
Clarke you made some interesting observations! But this is somewhat true. I think your examples were just too general off the bat
― Scrutable (Ówen P.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:41 (fourteen years ago)
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, January 21, 2012 5:40 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
wouldn't dude have been in high school back then? i kind of assumed the opposite
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:43 (fourteen years ago)
I think it's also funny that the writer felt the need to explain 'how indie works' to the collective readership of n+1
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:43 (fourteen years ago)
a few things
- i felt this way when i was just a pitchfork reader, and i gather this now from feedback i get about reviews from random ppl online or from a few ppl irl, but people who read pitchfork on the regular know the tastes and writing styles of the writers, and i bet regular pitchfork readers would have a pretty good percentage if asked to guess who wrote reviews if all the bylines were hidden
- seeing where a lot of ex-p forkers are now, i think it's gonna look like a really shortsighted criticism to say that the site has not produced "name critics". it's still a young site, that mostly attracts younger writers, and i feel confident in predicting that in 5 or 10 or 15 years, at least a few critics in the carmancia/frere-jones stratosphere will be pitchfork alumns
- along the same lines of what has been said, pfork is really able to attract and cultivate "influential" critics w/in genres, guys like breihan or sherburne or w/e
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:45 (fourteen years ago)
the site has not produced name critics because name critics don't exist
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
what does it 'mean' that lots of people at harvard like bon iver and sufjan? I don't think it means much until they you prove that they listen to them more than they listen to the beatles and jay-z (I'd put money on this being false), that there's some sorta important ethos that bon iver and sufjan share (I don't see one), and that the margin that people at harvard like them more than 'replacement value music' is meaningfully higher than the margin that white non-elites prefer or don't prefer this music to other music.
disagree strongly. i don't think you'd have to prove that people at [x institution] listen to more bon iver than jay-z for an observation abt the white/privileged status of indie rock to gain traction. i think its sufficient to note what i noted before, that jay-z is the pop of the nation as a whole (whatever class, income level, "race", etc.), but that indie's appeal is more demographically specific.
the common ethos among a broad spectrum of post-00 indie artists emerges pretty clearly, i think, when one considers (again again) the dominance of comforting, folk & 70s rock influenced, woodsy, americana-flirting, pastoral, nostalgic, childhood-besotted music within the genre as part of the homegrown arts culture of privileged, white, post-9/11 america.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
But then you're setting up the "search for the new Lester Bangs" as one that is doomed to fail. If Pitchfork wasn't what it is, but was a smaller more idiosyncratic publication, then many less people would be reading it, and its writers would be ruled out of the "voice of their generation" game by default.
If Pitchfork is serving up great, distinctive writing and the public is ignoring that writing, is Pitchfork to blame?
― Tim F, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:48 (fourteen years ago)
It's a very personal opinion of mine obv but I think Tom's column was this.
agree 100%. loved bower's puritan blister, too. i'm only really addressing the reviews.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:51 (fourteen years ago)
haha i have no idea how old this dude is but his thesis makes a lot more sense to me when i think abt the site when i was regular reader (like 99-02) than my impression of it now.
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:52 (fourteen years ago)
indie's appeal is more demographically specific.
well by that logic almost all music can be claimed to be demographically specific. anyway this is a side argument that interests only me I think but I think trying to find any political meaning in the fact that some college kids today have a bon iver track between kanye and the beatles on the ipod is basically absurd.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)
but again I think alfred's right about the music as consumer good thing which is why the wine guide comparison is so perfect.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:54 (fourteen years ago)
well by that logic almost all music can be claimed to be demographically specific.
b-b-but all music IS demographically specific! the demographics of cultural affiliation can tell us real and useful (and fascinating) things about the world we live in. i refuse to accept that art can or should be considered a politically/socially neutral "consumer good". idea is anathema to me on a very basic level.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 22:59 (fourteen years ago)
Not to snarkily answer a seemingly rhetorically question, but I'd have say yes, at least partly. Again, it's to do with the framing you brought up earlier. When we refer to "Pitchfork" we are actually referring to that framing; the larger Pitchfork is the framing, it's not the individually great and distinctive writing. To again (tediously) draw a wine-world analogy, I work for a small American importer of French and Italian wines. Our portfolio is fairly small and compact, and thus each grower is highlighted and popularized by virtue of holding a significant place within the portfolio. In my old job, for a significantly larger distributor of wines from all over the world, a French of Italian grower of similar caliber to one in my current portfolio could (and often does) easily get lost in the shuffle. I see this happen daily: our portfolio is viewed as an authority and a source of great wines for certain wine regions, because their position within the portfolio--and, importantly, within the daily activities of those of us who represent the portfolio--is highlighted. Whereas with my old portfolio, the public effectively ignored some of the great growers merely by virtue of them being framed within a too-large presentation.
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:01 (fourteen years ago)
well nothing is 'politically neutral' sure, but whatever the politics in popular music are so marginal (+considering how people consume music today) that they're not even worth talking about. (but if they are, you're gonna have to demonstrate it w/ some evidence etc. etc.)
you mentioned hro upthread - I think he's the best music critic around because he's the only person willing to treat new artists and genres as nothing more than a game for bored people / a useful way to define your consumer self.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)
enh music is both a fungible consumer good and a method of creating and maintaining class distinctions and these are p obv not mutually exclusive lol ideas of 'value' &c &c
anyway this just reinforces ryan's really excellent post upthread
― city wights (Lamp), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
but whatever the politics in popular music are so marginal (+considering how people consume music today) that they're not even worth talking about.
you're posting this on ilx where we spend hundreds of posts arguing whether tacos are better than burritos? think you need to re-define "worth talking about" for this context
― sarahell, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:06 (fourteen years ago)
Clarke, you haven't mentioend one important fact: most of the PFM "stars" have published elsewhere, so their stylistic idiosyncrasies still shine in other media. If I published a review in the NYT I'd expect to conform to its house style; that's not the NYT's fault.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:09 (fourteen years ago)
whatever the politics in popular music are so marginal (+considering how people consume music today) that they're not even worth talking about.
i honestly can't WTF this enough. it seems ridiculous to me on the face of it. in my view, more or less everything has a political dimension, especially things like art and consumer trends. i don't feel that i need evidence to support this thesis. it's one of my core assumptions about the fundamental character of the world, and i don't think i'm alone in that. i'm not asking you to agree with me, mind. we may be too far apart in our basic assumptions to have a productive discussion on the subject, i dunno.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
there's a difference between everything has a 'political dimension' in the grad school use of the word political and everything has a political dimension in that in the grand web of american politics would it make any difference if our future tumblr wite overlords had a bon iver song between kanye and the beatles on their ipod or uh, idk, a reggaeton song between kanye and the beatles on their ipod. I don't think so. it's just a distraction for most people, just as wine is just a drink that goes good w/ dinner for most people. that idea is super super super hard to relate to if you're a music critic or someone obsessed w/ music enough to be posting on this site.
but yeah we're almost definitely coming from very different assumptions about the world.
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
most of the PFM "stars" have published elsewhere, so their stylistic idiosyncrasies still shine in other media. If I published a review in the NYT I'd expect to conform to its house style; that's not the NYT's fault.
As someone who has just started a bit of writing for the place -- and as someone who has NO idea what style I have as a writer (seriously, anybody? I really don't think I've got a distinct voice!) -- I found myself able to talk about things pretty easily. There's been some edits, par for the course, but nothing that makes me go, "Wait, I wouldn't say THAT."
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:25 (fourteen years ago)
But how can stylistic idiosyncrasies shine if they're always being stifled in favor of a house style? I see your point, though, but my point above was less about individual writers than the way those writers can get ignored by the public in a too-large framing like (I'm tentatively suggesting) that of Pitchfork. If a wine grower wants to reach a larger audience, one way they can do this is by making themselves part of a portfolio that itself reaches a huge audience; but within a too-large portfolio, they can be under-emphasized (and thus end up selling less!). So, if a Pitchfork writer is already well-established in other publications, does writing for Pitchfork actually improve their reputation/standing, or does his/her reputation/standing actually suffer in the long run by virtue of being subsumed within the larger anonymity of Pitchfork? (Maybe I'm stretching the music criticism/wine analogy a bit too far here...)
― Clarke B., Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:26 (fourteen years ago)
"stifled"
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:34 (fourteen years ago)
You and I have different ideas about professional writing.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:35 (fourteen years ago)
...in the grand web of american politics would it make any difference if our future tumblr wite overlords had a bon iver song between kanye and the beatles on their ipod or uh, idk, a reggaeton song between kanye and the beatles on their ipod. I don't think so. it's just a distraction for most people, just as wine is just a drink that goes good w/ dinner for most people.
but that's a reductive and dismissive way of describing the politics i'm discussing here. at risk of being crucified, my argument is:
A) if "privileged white people" [insert a billion caveats here] really are america's "ruling class" [and a billion more here], and...
B) if privileged whites compose most of the pundits who narrate the "official" story of american culture to the nation at large, setting canons and defining the ostensibly important pop-cultural stories of the day through organs like NPR, the NYT and pitchfork (even if they're primarily speaking to themselves), and...
C) if privileged whites have a pronounced taste for the artistic products and punditry of other privileged white people, and...
D) if indie is a substantial part of the public voice of privileged white culture...
then the political dimension of indie's cultural centrality should be obvious, imo. of course, one might reject some or all of those ifs.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:50 (fourteen years ago)
a. there is no official story of american culture todayb. even if there were, music wouldn't play a big role in that storyc. even if it did, the type of music we're talking about isn't very populard. even if it were, it's depoliticized enough not to matter
also lol at privileged whites control p4k
― iatee, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:54 (fourteen years ago)
i think if you tend to listen to NPR, read NYT and PF, and don't spend a lot of other time w/other outlets (or maybe spend a lot of time with other people who do those things) then you might imagine the center of the universe being that, yes.
― omar little, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:58 (fourteen years ago)
There's been some edits, par for the course, but nothing that makes me go, "Wait, I wouldn't say THAT."
― Ned Raggett
...proving once and for all Belle and Sebastian's legacy towers over the likes of My Bloody Valentine and Smashing Pumpkins.- Ned Raggett
- Ned Raggett
― omar little, Saturday, 21 January 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)
Tsk.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
well, just as the rolling stone helped set the "canon" and define the ostensibly important aspects of pop culture in the 60s and 70s as they are now remembered and discussed (and challenged, transcended, whatever) by privileged whites, i'd say that pitchfork is doing the same today. there is no "center of the universe", after all. it's a chimera. my argument is that privileged whites often tend to treat the interests and doings of privileged whites as that center, and that due to their position of relative power in america, their voice in turn has considerable power - political, economic and cultural power. i'm not complaining about that, i'm merely observing the fact.
given that as groundwork, i think it becomes interesting to consider the sorts of things that privileged whites use their power to create, consume and construct narratives about. for instance, the character of indie culture in the post 9/11 era...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:50 (fourteen years ago)
^ i understand the recursive irony there, white culture gazing at the way white culture gazes at white culture
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:52 (fourteen years ago)
man I want to stay outta this, mostly, but I think identifying 60s-70s Rolling Stone's interests as that of the privileges misses rock's centrality in "middle" America in that era
i.e.
http://s11.lucyphotos.com/images/orig/e/i/ein62thohyfoie6y.jpg
― Euler, Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:54 (fourteen years ago)
Just want to say I think lamp is wrong when he implies that ppl aren't reading I.e. 2 chainz reviews (although pfork has not yet covered 2chainz) - if you read the boxden forums (sohh.com's forum I believe) you'll see 12 page threads of hip hop heads breaking down their opinions on jordans rick ross or mac miller reviews. When scott pointed out that pfork's audience now dwarfed its audience in the era clarke is idealizing, he wasnt kidding; people across the spectrum of the music biz read pitchfork, including the hip hop industry
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:57 (fourteen years ago)
Bachman Turner Overclass
― buzza, Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
I have really no experience with professional writing, so my sense that a house style really stifles anything is perhaps ill-formed. I'm sure different publications have different levels of editing intensity, and maybe the fact that P-fork does hire such a wide range of writers suggests that it doesn't edit quite as rigorously toward a house style. Ned's comments about not being over-edited suggest the same... Although, Ned, even though you can't articulate your style (and neither could I, really), your writing has always struck me as very distinctive and individually and clear-voiced.
― Clarke B., Sunday, 22 January 2012 01:05 (fourteen years ago)
Just want to say I think lamp is wrong when he implies that ppl aren't reading I.e. 2 chainz reviews
my point was more that me sense is that the dude who wrote the n+1 piece (and in all honestly contendo as well) isnt reading them, in large part because they dont fit into their idea of 'indie'. not that there isnt a readership for them at all.
and like if youre really interested in thinking abt the way that p4k has used its cultural capital and the relationship btw taste and class and ideas of connoisseurship than their coverage of britney or the clipse feels a lot more impt than fleet foxes
― i was a preteen blogger (Lamp), Sunday, 22 January 2012 01:09 (fourteen years ago)
I think this is what I was trying to get at upthread when I said, "It's almost like those early-ILM pop-ist tendencies have ossified into just another critical stance--broad-mindedness as orthodoxy rather than as the gumption to say 'fuck you and your rockism, I like this song.'" I mean, there's something about them reviewing stuff like Britney or the Clipse that just rings false to me, and it's not because I don't think there's any inherent value in pop music. It just makes me wonder why a site that used to be so oriented in the opposite direction of stuff like this decided to come around to radio pop and radio hip-hop in such a huge way... Maybe those with more connections to Pitchfork can speak to this.
― Clarke B., Sunday, 22 January 2012 01:29 (fourteen years ago)
er have you noticed who usually reviews Britney and pop?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 22 January 2012 01:42 (fourteen years ago)
I haven't; I don't really follow that stuff too closely... What are you getting at here?
― Clarke B., Sunday, 22 January 2012 01:53 (fourteen years ago)
what happened?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 January 2012 02:08 (fourteen years ago)
if even I think it's tedious then trust me, man, you don't wanna know
― @51TimesNo (some dude), Sunday, 22 January 2012 02:09 (fourteen years ago)
o i c. carry on. xp
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 22 January 2012 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
― Clarke B., Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:53 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
What he's getting at is that the shift happened because a lot of people who were (at one point) critical of Pitchfork's poor coverage of this type of stuff were brought on board as the site grew.
Having deej or j0rdan or Tim F or Tom Ewing or nabisco or Tom Breihan etc. writing for P4K is part of why there's been broader coverage.
― Somewhere between Fergie and Jesus (Alex in Montreal), Sunday, 22 January 2012 03:53 (fourteen years ago)
that's a good point, but the voice of white privilege isn't exclusively or even necessarily focused on privileged whiteness as its principal subject. "authenticity" was very important to the narrative of rock importance that arouse out of the late 60s, and the rolling stone was a major player in the construction of that narrative. the authenticity this narrative prized was often derived from a romantic vision of poor and working class lives and attitudes.
the rolling stone may sometimes have idealized a salt-of-the earth, middle-american vision of workingman's rock, but i suspect that its readership was largely white and liberal-arts educated, more urban than rural and more middle or upper class than poor (plus, you know, stonars). this was probably even more true of its writing and editorial staff. but that's just a hunch, and to really defend that assertion, i'd need what iatee's been demanding all along: statistics.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 06:54 (fourteen years ago)
"...but i suspect that its readership was largely skewed white and liberal-arts educated..."
slightly more defensible
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 07:00 (fourteen years ago)
my point was more that me sense is that the dude who wrote the n+1 piece (and in all honestly contendo as well) isnt reading them, in large part because they dont fit into their idea of 'indie'.
not sure where this comes from. when it comes to pfork, i'm much more likely to skip the reviews of boilerplate indie stuff than anything else. i gravitate to the hip hop, r&b and dance writing because i think it tends to be better and more interesting overall, perhaps because i'm not so well-educated abt those genres and could use the pointers.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 07:06 (fourteen years ago)
In the last decade, however, indie rock has classed up, steadily abandoning these lower-class fans (along with the midsized cities they live in) for the young, college-educated white people who now populate America’s major cities and media centers.
I know it's fun for people to say this, but it seems weird to me that a genre that was known for at least the first half of its life as "college rock" suddenly has fans that are college-educated.
― Tony Last, Sunday, 22 January 2012 07:22 (fourteen years ago)
yeah but when you talk about 'pitchfork' it sounds like you're talking about the indie stuff.
― Tim F, Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:10 (fourteen years ago)
i do still think of pitchfork, primarily, as an indie site. even in its expansion, i don't believe that it has shed this fundamental identity. it has broadened beyond its initial focus on indie rock, of course, but the interests and doings of indie culture have expanded along with it. with that in mind, the buttoned-down, authoritative uniformity of pitchfork's overall authorial/editorial tone suggests that its coverage of other genres = "indie culture examines and evaluates the larger world".
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
and speaking of that "buttoned-down, authoritative uniformity", i decided to check the site for references to 2 chainz, as suggested above. this JS track review is all i found:
Big K.R.I.T.'s reverent, well-studied throwbacks to when Southern rap was closest to rhythm & blues leave little room for being surprised. At his worst, K.R.I.T. renders himself insignificant, unable to transcend the music that he so liberally draws from. But at his best, he slides comfortably into the canon next to legends like 8Ball & MJG, and that's no slight accomplishment. "Money on the Floor," the purported lead single off his forthcoming debut album Live From the Underground, is one of those rare K.R.I.T. songs that not only justifies his existence but also makes you wonder if the guy was beamed in straight from 1996. This is dramatic, cinematic strip club music, with impossibly deep, rumbling bass and lush keyboard and vocal flourishes buried in the mix, which hit so accurately that you almost expect cigarette smoke to start emanating from your speakers. Maybe the benefit of knowing all of K.R.I.T.'s tricks ahead of time is that he can still sneak up on you with a track so good that it knocks you out cold.
it's, smart, knowledgeable and very well written, but i can't imagine a drier, more professionally dispassionate critical voice. like most of pitchfork's writing, it's scrupulously journalistic, reading like the new york times house style applied to a hip hop single. there's no trace of a distinctive authorial voice. there's absolutely nothing wrong with this, of course, but it does tend to enhance the idea that it's pitchfork speaking, not any particular writer.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:11 (fourteen years ago)
re: upwardly mobile college-educated urban whites
• i got a hot dog at the organic park slope hot dog joint and they played modest mouse, spoon, shins, band of horses (i think) and radiohead• went to a party and they played hives, julian casablancas, guns and roses and bon jovi• thought of you guys • http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
"College rock" and "indie rock" were different things in the '80s, though. 10,000 Maniacs vs. Husker Du.
― Girl I want to take you to a JBR (jaymc), Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:17 (fourteen years ago)
it's scrupulously journalistic, reading like the new york times house style
okay, that was silly. it reads like a scuffed-up, impressionistic version of the default journalistic "reviewer's" voice.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
i think pitchfork is more solid now than ever. and it has the most talented people writing for it that its ever had. a lot of the stuff written about isn't necessarily my "thing", but the site as a whole makes a good case for what it likes via different voices. i like sites/magazines that are unified but that don't feel claustrophobic or that they are just preaching to the choir. wait a minute, i do actually like those sites and magazines too...i mean, i like genre fanatics.
i don't know, i just think that there are individual voices there and they make the whole what it is. i don't get the heavy editorial vibe from it.
― scott seward, Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:25 (fourteen years ago)
disclaimer: i rarely look at the site. but when i do i notice things...
i should look more though cuz i dig a bunch of the people writing there now. sorry, people i dig!
― scott seward, Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:26 (fourteen years ago)
i can't imagine a drier, more professionally dispassionate critical voice. like most of pitchfork's writing, it's scrupulously journalistic, reading like the new york times house style applied to a hip hop single.
keeping in mind who i'm responding to, i would say that this is generally a correct assessment, and yet i truly see nothing wrong with writing that is journalistic, professional and could be published in the new york times. to me that codes as authoritative and composed, and that's generally what i try to come off as when i'm writing for pitchfork, which as a site is an authority, if not the authority. and i guess, i'm not quite sure what the opposite would be, anyway, tho coming from the PRR fanboy, i could probably guess. we write within parameters, but so does anyone that writes for a publication.
there's no trace of a distinctive authorial voice.
again, i would point out that, ime, regular pitchfork readers know the taste and writing of the site's writers. the writing isn't outwardly personal (thank god) but there's certainly enough space allowed for individual voice that most people wouldn't confuse my writing with ian's or brandon's.
there's absolutely nothing wrong with this, of course, but it does tend to enhance the idea that it's pitchfork speaking, not any particular writer.
i don't think this is a critique unique to pitchfork at all, and both writers and publications are strengthened and empowered when writing is backed by the authority of a publication's name and/or reputation, even if that is manifested as "pitchfork speaking"
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:32 (fourteen years ago)
rolling stone may sometimes have idealized a salt-of-the earth, middle-american vision of workingman's rock, but i suspect that its readership was largely white and liberal-arts educated, more urban than rural and more middle or upper class than poor
Sorry, but this strikes me as slightly vile. Lester Bangs grew up with a single mom in an apartment in El Cajon.
― timellison, Sunday, 22 January 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
well that settles the argument about the demographics of rolling stone's readership *zips up messenger bag*
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:06 (fourteen years ago)
thanks, jordan. i regretted that post as soon as i hit submit. it came off as a personal attack, and that's not at all what i intended (though perhaps i'm thoughtlessly jerky by nature and should just go with it, i dunno).
agree on all points. i don't have anything against a professionally journalistic critical style. for the most part, i try to write that way myself. i'm not a beat poet. my only point in bringing authorial style up was to highlight the way in which a mature, journalistic approach helps create the "pitchfork says" impression. and there's nothing wrong with that, either.
that said, i do like to see a bit more "voice" in critical writing than what pitchfork typically offers, but that's neither here nor there. and i can't tell you how much i wish i'd never opened my mouth about PRR.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
btw i didn't take it as a personal attack, it's cool
― tyga mother (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:08 (fourteen years ago)
Well Jordan, why don't you do a survey of how many members of Big Brother and the Holding Company, Quicksilver Messenger Service, the Dead, and the Airplane and find out how many came from middle and upper class families and how many came from working class or poor families and then get back to me.
― timellison, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
Lester Bangs grew up with a single mom in an apartment in El Cajon.
yeah, i know. i've read a good bit about and, and besides, his views on class and politics are quite apparent in his critical writing.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
how many members of Big Brother and the Holding Company, Quicksilver Messenger Service, the Dead, and the Airplane and find out how many came from middle and upper class families and how many came from working class or poor families and then get back to me.
question for me would be how attractive the 60s counterculture was to young, middle and upper-class white liberals. and whether or not in the long run the rolling stone became a voice for the aging of that particular post-60s demographic.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
Well, dispassionately, let me say this: I suspect that you seriously underestimate the number of readers back in the day that were working class or poor.
― timellison, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:24 (fourteen years ago)
perhaps i do, and perhaps i'm just making my point badly. i don't doubt that the rolling stone had a broad readership in its day. i don't doubt that its writers and editorial workers came from varied backgrounds. nevertheless, i suspect that, throughout its history, the majority of its staffers were white, liberal, college-educated, and roughly "middle class". that describes a hell of a lot of america, after all, and an even bigger slice of the people who make a living in journalism even today. i also suspect that its readership skewed in those demographic directions. i'm not bashing the rolling stone or educated, middle-class, liberal whites in saying that.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
"middle class" does not describe a hell of a lot of people on journalism today
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
again all these arguments are based on demographic trends that you suspect. if you want to make a serious argument you need more than some suspicions about certain groups of people.
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:46 (fourteen years ago)
nvm forgot this was ilm
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:47 (fourteen years ago)
"indie" wasn't really used back then. both of these bands would have been called "alternative" husker du was definitely college rock, can't remember if the maniacs were considered that
― buzza, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
I'm sure they were with whatever buzz they had with the first two indie records and probably still considered that way when the first major label album came out. (They kind of broke out more with the second album.)
― timellison, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:55 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, i granted that wr2 the rolling stone quite a few posts back, even crediting it with "i'd need what iatee's been demanding all along: statistics."
i'm about 75% satisfied with these "observations" (assumptions) for my own purposes, but i don't hope to overcome anyone's doubts simply by bloviating.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
And just for the record, it wasn't really "college rock," it was "college radio music" - "college" came specifically from a reference to college radio.
― timellison, Sunday, 22 January 2012 18:59 (fourteen years ago)
i remember "independent music" and "indie rock" creeping into the american fan vocabulary in the early-mid 80s, roughly coincident with sneering at "corporate rock". seemed to me that it was primarily used to describe post-punk/HC bands on labels like homestead, touch and go and sst.
"college rock" was used, too, but seemed more like an industry term, wasn't as associated with punk culture, and didn't necessarily limit itself to bands on independent labels (as indie did). this punk-derived and aggressive political/economic self-ostracism was very important to the indie rock culture of the day.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
― iatee, Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:41 AM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
not sure what you mean by this. are you speaking of class background in a european sense, or about simple income level? family histories and cultures or just where people are positioned in the current moment? most mainstream american journalism in the late 20th century strikes me as deeply middle class, but i'm talking about culture at least as much as the money involved.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:14 (fourteen years ago)
― buzza, Sunday, January 22, 2012 6:49 PM (32 minutes ago)
otm - with "college rock" being bands that were played on college radio (as tim mentioned), and "alternative" being mtv/modern rock radio bands. There was plenty of cross-over but they weren't synonymous.
― sarahell, Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
well in that case you are almost defining your terms in a way that ensures that you can't be wrong. if 'middle class' is only a cultural concept and not an economic one and some of the cultural objects w/ which you're choosing to associate it are certain forms of journalism, then yes, they're 'middle class'. whereas if you came up w/ an economic definition of middle class and tried to answer the question 'how influential was 'rolling stone' w/r/t this demographic?' at least you'd be saying something instead of just defining yourself into rightness
I don't think the American class system exists in any way comparable to the European one. really dragging this thread off subject tho but otoh lol p4k
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:34 (fourteen years ago)
but that's just industry-speak. those are divisions a programmer or marketer might make. i can't remember thinking as a fan that i might like "college rock" (except when i first read about REM in the rolling stone in '83), but i was deeply committed a year or two later to "independent music".
"alternative" emerged alongside "independent" and "indie" and initially seemed to mean more-or-less the same thing (anticommercial, not on a corrupt major label), but was later transformed into an apolitical genre descriptor by radio and MTV.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:51 (fourteen years ago)
if 'middle class' is only a cultural concept and not an economic one and some of the cultural objects w/ which you're choosing to associate it are certain forms of journalism, then yes, they're 'middle class'. whereas if you came up w/ an economic definition of middle class and tried to answer the question 'how influential was 'rolling stone' w/r/t this demographic?' at least you'd be saying something instead of just defining yourself into rightness
well, i wouldn't say that i'm trying to define myself into rightness, but i am much more interested in cultural concepts than statistics. and while a rigid, formal "class system" in the european sense doesn't really exist in america, cultural class very much does, imo.
discussions of class, however, never go very well on ILX, so w/e.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:55 (fourteen years ago)
i just never heard the term "indie rock" until the mid/late 90s.
― sarahell, Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:55 (fourteen years ago)
my xpost was to sarahell
sebadoh's "gimme indie rock" came out in '91. was mocking what had become a cliche, so...
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:57 (fourteen years ago)
i remember "independent music" and "indie rock" creeping into the american fan vocabulary in the early-mid 80s, ... seemed to me that it was primarily used to describe post-punk/HC bands on labels like homestead, touch and go and sst.
that could very well be true, as i wasn't into those bands.
― sarahell, Sunday, 22 January 2012 19:59 (fourteen years ago)
America isn't Brooklyn
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 20:05 (fourteen years ago)
oops that was supposed to be a response to whiney's post elsewhere. zing playing games on me.
― iatee, Sunday, 22 January 2012 20:06 (fourteen years ago)
i consider nabisco to be a high-profile critic with a unique style on the same tier as l bangs & others mentioned that came from pitchfork
― flopson, Sunday, 22 January 2012 20:07 (fourteen years ago)
^ good point, agree completely
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Sunday, 22 January 2012 23:40 (fourteen years ago)
lol u guys
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 23 January 2012 01:23 (fourteen years ago)
lester nabangco
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Monday, 23 January 2012 04:19 (fourteen years ago)
"Thinking the Unthinkable About John Lennon." John Lennon obituary. L.A. Times, 11 December 1980 in the Selected Works section of Lester Bangs's wikipedia page is linked to an ilx thread.
― beachville, Monday, 23 January 2012 14:30 (fourteen years ago)
i think that while whiney is generally right abt mentioning ilx in irl writing being bad etiquette, but scottpl on last years pazz n jop thread was a pretty unusual (maybe unprecedented?) instance of outspokenness/self-awareness from a site that has little to no explicit discussion of its own goals/criteria/success etc on the site itself
― flopson, Monday, 23 January 2012 14:39 (fourteen years ago)
i don't generally like playing this particular game but from today's review of First Aid Kit:
Klara and Johanna say they wrote the song before they'd set foot in America. As if to make up for lost time, last year, when they finally came over to the States, they went to California, out to Joshua Tree. It was the birthday of Gram Parsons, who would have been 65 if he hadn't died there when he was 26. They made the music video for "Emmylou" there, wearing caftans and drifting side by side through the scrubby desert like characters in a psychedelic Aaron Sorkin drama.
Can anyone explain this 'psychedelic Aaron Sorkin' reference to me? If anything the album sounds like the total opposite of something you'd describe as Sorkin-esque. It's guileless and understated, not wordy and witty.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:13 (fourteen years ago)
I think it was in reference to the video (which I havent seen). I imagine it means there are long 'walk&talk' type shots.
― Regional Tug (irrational), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:17 (fourteen years ago)
I don't see it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC57z-oDPLs
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:21 (fourteen years ago)
I really really like Mark Richardson's Pitchfork articles, IMO they're head and shoulders better than anything else on the site. They seem to come pretty infrequently though.
Personally, I always preferred the Brent DiC headslap era more than what they've got going now - at least his reviews were entertaining, even if I disagreed with everything in them. The current reviews are so faceless and full of unexciting hyperbole that I literally can't read any of them past the first few sentences.
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
there are some contexts in which "faceless" can be a pretty damning criticism, but i don't think record reviews are one of them. some great reviews call a lot of attention to the writer, some of frame its thoughts about the record so well that you don't even think about who's writing it at all.
― some dude, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 17:07 (fourteen years ago)
yes, but in general those reviews don't appear on Pitchfork
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
to say that the site that regularly publishes 'resonant frequency,' 'why we fight,' 'the out door,' (to say nothing of once-regular columns by philip sherburne on techno, martin clark on dubstep & escobedo's once-great 'interrobang (?!)') has produced 'no major critics' deliberately ignores a lot of majorly impressive work imo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
depends on what "major critics" means -- pitchfork definitely has a lot of the biggest talents in music criticism writing for them, but at the same time none of those dudes you listed are nearly as [insert word here] as a christgau or bangs
― markers, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
like, if i were to go ask someone who doesn't read ilm to name me a music critic, it's a thousand times more likely that they'd name lester bangs than a pitchfork columnist. again, i know i'm working off a definition of "major" that i can't even fully articulate, but there's definitely a difference there
― markers, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
who are 'major critics'? outside of 'people who happen to hold the post at the biggest publications (nyt, nyer)' there's not really an example of someone who's gonna go down defining this generation of music journalism
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:21 (fourteen years ago)
By those measures, are there ANY "major" critics that have started writing within the past 15 years?
― Girl I want to take you to a JBR (jaymc), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:22 (fourteen years ago)
(xp)
lester bangs has been dead 20 years -- if you asked someone to name a music critic and they said him, you're probably talking to the wrong person about music criticism
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:22 (fourteen years ago)
99% of america could not name a music critic (citation: gallup research)
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)
if i were to go ask someone who doesn't read ilm to name me a music critic
they would not be able to name one, most likely. music critics are not legendary celebrities with the world at large.
and besides Pfork hasn't even been around for as long as Bangs has been dead
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)
music crit is dead but not bc we're just missing the dynamo talent that would be necessary to make ppl interested again. it's dead bc it exhausted its prophetic code and it has nothing new to say.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)
mark prindle?
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
how many people could ever name a rock critic though? i doubt that many in any year ever
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
Here's another example of current interest:
161Backers $6,925pledged of $15,000 goal 6 days to go
Daphne Carr is having trouble raising funds via kickstarter to keep the "Best Music Writing" series going now that Da Capo no longer wants to publish it
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pda/launch-the-best-music-writing-series-as-an-indie-p
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
pretty sure if i asked my immediate circle of friends to name a music critic, they would name nabisco (mostly due to some of his articles getting passed around word-of-mouth style).
― the third kind of dubstep (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:41 (fourteen years ago)
Pitchfork Reviews Reviews guy seems to think that Jim DeRogatis is the "most famous living rock critic," though it's not clear what he's basing that on.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:04 (fourteen years ago)
weight?
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:24 (fourteen years ago)
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:25 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is really not true
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:32 (fourteen years ago)
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)
totally blown away that a writer who has been dead 30 years has a higher profile than writers currently writing. just mind-blowing.
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:33 PM (6 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
music writing has 'nothing new to say'?? as long as there is new music there are new things to say about it
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:34 (fourteen years ago)
eventually the current discussion around music will be codified and celebrated and anthologized, or maybe it won't! but it's that process of anthologizing and eulogizing 'major critics' that makes people claim stuff like "pitchfork hasn't produced a major critic!" with a completely straight face, not the writing itself
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
sure in the technical sense that you can constantly generate new sentences that have not been written before but not in the sense of actually having an impact left to make on the culture. music crit (and really i mean rock crit as distinct from say attali or adorno or whomever) made its critique in the 60s and 70s and that critique has been fully assimilated into popular culture. it's over. maybe something new will show up tho, but probably not on p4k.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Tuesday, January 24, 2012 10:43 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
they're published regularly, once per month, in addition to his many reviews
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:37 (fourteen years ago)
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:36 PM (52 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i think you're overexaggerating the impact of 60s/70s rock crit & underestimating the crit of today. first off, isn't ilx based on a bunch of theories about music writing that largely reject 60s/70s rock journo ideas?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:38 (fourteen years ago)
i'll admit popism/rockism dialectic did seem to momentarily breath some life into rock crit, but it could've just as easily been last dying breath type thing. final words...
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
so glad we've replaced the rock is dead argument with the rock crit is dead argument lol
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
rock is dead bc rock crit is dead
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 21:59 (fourteen years ago)
I would guess the best known generally discussed rock critics outside of the cognoscenti audience would be SFJ, Christgau, the NYT stable and Klosterman.
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 22:13 (fourteen years ago)
because, surprise, they are nationally syndicated on paper.
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:55 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i suspect you're just not familiar w/ the stuff being argued now?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 22:16 (fourteen years ago)
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:22 (1 hour ago) Permalink
Moreover, given the baby boomers have been so successful and relentless at celebrating every aspect of their culture it's hardly surprising that they're also the only generation that has managed to make pseudo-celebrities out of their rock critics.
I'm sure that if Phillip Seymour Hoffman starred as Nabisco shaking his head in disgust at a kid wannabe-journalist going on tour with Foster The People, a lot more people would know who Nabisco is too.
More seriously, publishing books seems to be the biggest ticket to psuedo-celebritydom. A lot of the rep that older critics have for their earlier magazine etc. writing has been retrospectively built-up.
My sense is that Bangs, Marsh, Marcus, Meltzer, Derogatis, Reynolds, Klosterman, Toop, Eddy and Cohn are all much more famous amongst the general public for books they written (or anthologies of their work) than for their writing in particular media outlets.
The only exceptions to that rule are:
- Christgau, who invented the Consumer Guide for chrissakes and also ran Pazz & Jop forever, so it's hardly surprising - plus he's been around literally forever.
- Frere-Jones, the NYT pop critic for some time (pretty much the most individual-promoting regular music journalist gig you can get nowadays) - which is why Nabisco is likely to get quite well-known as well.
- Kogan, who probably isn't even well known enough outside of ILX-like circles to count, but built a pretty unique and distinct rep before he was anthologised through sheer force of will (but I bet anthologisation has helped!).
― Tim F, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 22:24 (fourteen years ago)
Trying to think if Nabisco has ever written anything as blatantly boneheaded or cursory as S F-J's Magnetic Fields is racist piece, that indie rock needs more Africa piece or his recent black metal piece or electronic music piece. Hmm, more I think about it, more I think the New Yorker has not been good for S F-J ...
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)
idk what you're talking about but unless you have harvested a secret vein of music crit i suspect i've read whatever you think we're discussing
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 22:41 (fourteen years ago)
then what about lester bangs writing sets it so far apart?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
you're putting that stuff on a pedestal
it's not inherently better but it articulated the critique for the first time and so it felt radical and revolutionary. now that the critique has been assimilated it only feels radical as a piece of historical writing and pieces that mimic its style or ambition just feel outdated and staid. they haven't gotten worse, just less important and compelling.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:11 (fourteen years ago)
I think the only thing that really sets so-called classic crit apart is access. These dudes could just hang with Lou Reed and the Clash at will; obviously good material follows. Control-minded publicists killed rock critics.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
It sure ain't helped.
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
lol 'prophetic code' gimme a break
― # (Lamp), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
again, i think you've decided that based on years of marketing on behalf of his ideas. If they've grown 'less important' then it's because certain types of music have less of a central role, that tastes are more diversified now, but i fundamentally disagree that this means that the writing about music is 'less important and compelling'.
i also just find it hard to believe that writing from prior to the advent of postmodernism & prior to the advent of hip-hop and house/techno -- if we're talking about both history of thought & history of music, respectively -- is so much more important than the writing that came in the wake of those massive changes
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:15 (fourteen years ago)
as a thought experiment, pick some contemporary music (an artist, or act or recording or whatever) that you think pushes forward music in a new important way, or is just intensely interesting/compelling. now pick a contemporary piece of music crit that you think equals or even approaches the accomplishment of that piece. and i mean that the syntax, the idioms, the tropes of music crit are being rearranged and experimented upon. i mean any one piece. i'd like to read it.
i think there's some that maybe approaches that, but nothing in "rock crit"
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:17 (fourteen years ago)
personally I find the majority of writing about house/techno really impenetrable (yes even Simon Reynolds) in a way that other music crit is not. something about it being so divorced from the formal qualities of the music it's discussing maybe.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
you're setting expectations of what 'forward thinking music crit' would be. this is like rockism for writing, setting your expectations before you even hear the work in question xp
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
i'm open to "hearing" the work in question. make your case.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
imo the opening 'energy flash' is an example of criticism changing the way people discussed music before & after in a way easily as influential or significant as idk lester bangs realizing that you cant help ALL the bums when listening to astral weeks
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:19 PM (34 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
except that you've rigged the game to start
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
what piece am i comparing new criticism with?
it doesn't really matter on the piece you're comparing it to. just take a piece of popular crit that you think is really moving things forward. like if you picked the #1 piece of music crit of the year and were going to write your impassioned case for it. you know, the case you'd make for that song you really thought defined 2011 and here's your 500 word heart-on-sleeve explanation of why it's the greatest thing ever to go on your blog / comments section / ilx thread / ballot. not, "here's an okay piece of writing that i think is mostly grammatically correct and makes an okay case for its thesis."
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)
this emphasis on novelty seems very jagger-esque
― the third kind of dubstep (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:25 (fourteen years ago)
so just find a piece of music writing that i really liked in 2011? ok
http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2011/10/26/141735626/whos-still-jenny-from-the-block-an-examination-of-autobiography-in-pop
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
i think she talks a lot about stuff there that hasnt been discussed in prior rock crit, or when it has, it's not tied together quite like this.
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:28 (fourteen years ago)
it's not really a novelty test, Jordan, it's a passion test. i was just using novelty as a possible way of approaching that. (just think: shit you get excited about)
and i'll check out the piece, but if i wrote some equivocal crap like, "i think she talks a lot about stuff there that hasnt been discussed in prior rock crit, or when it has, it's not tied together quite like this" about a song I loved...
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:31 (fourteen years ago)
its not about a song? its about the state of popular music? now i'm not even convinced that you've read boomer music crit either
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:32 (fourteen years ago)
like, how is that 'equivocal'?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:33 (fourteen years ago)
if you think the only possible purpose of music crit is just journalistic than the problem isn't that i think it has died, it's that you never thought very much of it to begin with
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:33 (fourteen years ago)
idk, equivocal in the sense that i expect more from writing and music than just tying together previous discussions in slightly new ways. maybe i'm misreading you but it sounds like you have a different standard for music + writing. am i wrong?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:37 (fourteen years ago)
these days i'm a lot more interested in a really insightful cultural analysis of a song/musician/scene than some passionate hyperbole about it (and being journalistic doesn't preclude being passionate/liking stuff). makes a lot more sense given how access to music has changed.
― the third kind of dubstep (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:38 (fourteen years ago)
no, you have the passionate hyperbole about the writing. the writing doesn't have to be passionate hyperbole
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:39 (fourteen years ago)
idk, equivocal in the sense that i expect more from writing and music than just tying together previous discussions in slightly new ways.
― Mordy, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:37 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i think you underestimate how much this also describes boomer critdont believe the hype
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:41 (fourteen years ago)
do u include lipstick traces in boomer crit?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:42 (fourteen years ago)
can we make this happen
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:46 (fourteen years ago)
also, i should cop that i was using a little hyperbole when i made the first comment re 'prophetic code' which was supposed to be a little indicated in me using the words 'prophetic code.' i still think there's not a lot if anything good music crit right now (a little more in music academia than music journalism) and i am having trouble anticipating what it could do to be interesting to me again
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:46 (fourteen years ago)
"Kid, the most important thing is--you've got to be OTM. OTM, and unmerciful."
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:47 (fourteen years ago)
i don't know, i'm pretty passionate about my enjoyment of nabisco's articles (to the extent that i've gotten some irl friends on the bandwagon), and i look forward to them. maybe people liked lester bangs more 30+ years ago than i like what i like? who cares?
― the third kind of dubstep (Jordan), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:47 (fourteen years ago)
i don't really want to talk about specific ppl's writing, esp ilx posters. i like nabisco and i like a lot of his articles. i find enjoyable a lot of the writing of ppl who write music crit. it can be funny, interesting, talk about music worth listening to, etc.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:48 (fourteen years ago)
a lot of the writers who write for p4k (esp the columns and some of the reviewers even) are competent enough writers to be interesting.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:50 (fourteen years ago)
when was it interesting to you?
― scott seward, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:55 (fourteen years ago)
like a list of work i've really loved? i thought kogan's 'real punks' collection was amazing. i think alex ross' rest is noise was really impressive, about epic in scope, tho a little new yorker house style. i mentioned lipstick traces above. i think sounds of africa was really interesting in form and content. um. i loved baum's 'jake leg blues' piece, and moten's in the break...
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:00 (fourteen years ago)
the rest is noise, which was published in 2007?
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:04 (fourteen years ago)
hyperbole
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:04 (fourteen years ago)
but also more on the academic side of music crit i'd say. certainly in subject (classical + avant garde music) and half-way in style.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:05 (fourteen years ago)
maybe the problem is that i'm on ilx + the really innovative stuff emerges here before being distilled into 'professional popular music criticism?' just spitballing...
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:06 (fourteen years ago)
i enjoyed the rest is noise quite a bit
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:07 (fourteen years ago)
The Rest Is Noise by Alex Ross
I just picked up my copy of this yesterday and although I have yet to start reading it, I'm really excited for it. Has anyone else picked this up or is planning on picking it up and reading it? What do you think?
― three handclaps, Sunday, October 28, 2007 8:23 PM
me irl -- and i never read it
― markers, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:07 (fourteen years ago)
The Rest Is Noise is pretty good. I thought it was gonna focus on later stuff more (you're 2/3 of the way through the book by the time you get to 1945) but hey, I learned some stuff.
― B-Boy Bualadh Bos (ecuador_with_a_c), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
mordy's post itt are astonishingly dumb
― flopson, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:35 (fourteen years ago)
your post itt are
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:46 (fourteen years ago)
itt are
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:47 (fourteen years ago)
itt
remember the days when you could feel a music critic's breath inside your ear?
remember the days when the syntax, the idioms, the tropes of music crit were being rearranged and experimented upon, and not just reformulated into the same-old "grammatically correct" been-there-done-that processed garbage?
― flopson, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 03:09 (fourteen years ago)
I cannot accept Mordy's basic thesis in a world where (and at a time when) articles like this get written and published:
http://pitchfork.com/features/poptimist/7848-poptimist-32/
― Tim F, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 03:13 (fourteen years ago)
xp do u remember when
― Mordy, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 03:14 (fourteen years ago)
Your argument about reliance on critical "tropes" is very vague for such a big allegation.
― timellison, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
Although I may share some disillusionment about Pitchfork's current-day record reviews with some of the posters ITT, I definitely disagree about music writing *in general* not being what it used to be. There have been threads on ILM that I've gotten more pleasure, insight, and enjoyment from than almost anything by the stars of the old-school rockcrit canon. And, as I mentioned before, the columns on P-fork are generally outstanding (although I do wish they did more with electronic and dance these days in that regard), not to mention the loads of great blogs, etc. And yeah, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy, a foregone conclusion, if you decide there will never be another Lester Bangs--then of course there won't be! Thinking about it the past few days, I really think it's the reviews that have made me somewhat bored of P-fork--lots of records I don't care about, with slightly too detached/clinical writing for my tastes, and I find the point-scores forced and distasteful (always have, really, but at least reviewers in the early days seemed to really play with them--almost mocking the very notion of a 10-point scale (which should be mocked!) with some of the extreme scores they dropped). What use is it to try and figure out which precise decimal place in the yawning chasm of mediocrity between, say, 6.2 and 7.5, to employ--much less what that number "means"?
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:51 (fourteen years ago)
I definitely disagree about music writing *in general* not being what it used to be. There have been threads on ILM that I've gotten more pleasure, insight, and enjoyment from than almost anything by the stars of the old-school rockcrit canon.
this is key tho
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:52 (fourteen years ago)
How do you mean?
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:56 (fourteen years ago)
music journalism doesn't have the same authority it did because peoples opinions about things, often well-written and interesting opinions, are available freely on the internet. iirc dave cool started yelling about this once on a camera.
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:58 (fourteen years ago)
How are we still talking about this?
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 05:34 (fourteen years ago)
All opinions are not created equal, some writers are better than others, there's obv a lot more crap out there but just because more people are sharing their opinions doesn't mean there's less insightful commentary.
― river, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 05:39 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think anyone said there is less insightful commentary, I would say by almost any measure there is probably more interesting stuff being written about music than ever. but the subject was 'why hasn't p4k created a music critic superstar' and I think the answers are 'well...that doesn't really exist' and 'even if it did probably won't exist again'
― iatee, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 05:45 (fourteen years ago)
Idk seems like "music crit is dead" is what Mordy was arguing but it's been a hell of a day
― river, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 06:09 (fourteen years ago)
it's not like there's no personality at all, but the tendency is to the dry and professionally dispassionate - subjectivity given the voice of objectivity. this remains true whether the music being written about is rock, pop, hip hop, noise or whatever.
Was thinking about this in the supermarket the other day.
I think my own writing style doesn't change much b/w pitchfork and non-pro settings except in terms of length, the former being edited down mostly by me with positive and negative results. But while I recognise "dry and professionally dispassionate" as something that applies to me, it's not something I actually adopted as a writing style. Feels more like the consequence of how I listen to music and what I listen for - the experience being basically just a running commentary of half-formed comments-for-review in my head... what is the music trying to do? what does it remind me of? how does it function? does it function well? etc. etc.
I tend to think that this kind of approach tends to encourage a certain... measuredness. The questions you begin to ask become more specific, more embedded within the process of listening to lots of records, rather than constantly blown up into mighty crusades.
Anyway, personalising this because I sort of feel there's too sharp a distinction between drawn between how we hear music and how we write about it, but necessarily I can only use myself as evidence to the contrary.
Also wtf, shakey have you ever read a dance music magazine.
― Tim F, Monday, 30 January 2012 09:26 (fourteen years ago)
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lstranahan/2012/02/24/pitchfork-media-gives-a-10-0-rating-to-bloody-revolution/
― max, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:33 (fourteen years ago)
noted wit Lee Stranahn.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 February 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/userphoto/4008.thumbnail.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:39 (fourteen years ago)
Lee Stranahan is a freelance writer, an award winning photographer, independent digital filmmaker, graphic artist and he's taught thousands of people around the world how to make money making art through his personal consultation, seminars and articles
For a complete list of how to find Lee and his work, visit LeeStranahan.com.
― buzza, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:40 (fourteen years ago)
Thank you, no.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
So, when the edge cutters at Pitchfork set their horned-rimmed sights on the Occupy movement and “bloody revolution,” you squares would do well to listen. The next budding frustrated musician like Charles Manson may be releasing unlistenable MP3s right now, and Pitchfork wants to be the one bringing them to you.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 February 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
those edge cutters setting their horn-rimmed sights on lattes.
http://leestranahan.com/income-inequality-music-rushs-the-trees-from-1978
― buzza, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:42 (fourteen years ago)
I really am convinced that people like this never have any fun or are genuinely happy about anything. It must be such a boring life.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:43 (fourteen years ago)
is that a quote?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 February 2012 18:44 (fourteen years ago)
Lee Stranahan @StranahanFollow
@tigerbeat @getsworse I'm with Camile Pagilia on some of this stuff; ideological, leftist feminists (Dworkin, etc) are pretty awful10:22 AM - 24 Feb 12 via TweetDeck · Embed this Tweet
Reply Retweet Favorite
― buzza, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:45 (fourteen years ago)
Tiger Beat...the magazine?
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 24 February 2012 18:50 (fourteen years ago)
Nope, just a straight-up sentiment on my part.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_r2ADxep9T3s/TPUKRjT6FYI/AAAAAAAADgA/lEAlSkTEjkQ/s1600/TigerBeat.jpg
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 February 2012 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
Not surprised or anything, but gotta love how interviewer Brandon Stosuy = "Pitchfork."
― Ascot Fitzgerald (jaymc), Friday, 24 February 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)
That guy pretending he's taking bong hits makes an excellent point: people do sell goods and services for money
― little clouds of citrus spritz as i peel (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 February 2012 23:45 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.timeoutchicago.com/things-to-do/chicago-blog/16207951/pitchfork-starting-movie-website-pitchfilm-com
― markers, Saturday, 27 April 2013 01:35 (thirteen years ago)
the "let's determine the name" meeting was on a friday at 4:58 apparently
― brb buying poppers w/my employee discount (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 27 April 2013 04:58 (thirteen years ago)
it was neck and neck with moviesfork
― kaygee, Saturday, 27 April 2013 05:07 (thirteen years ago)
So hey, from the American Society of Magazine Editors' Ellies awards:
https://twitter.com/ASME1963/status/330116705797955584
General Excellence, Digital Media goes to @PitchforkMedia!
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 May 2013 01:26 (thirteen years ago)
https://twitter.com/garyvee/status/332324192483680257
― markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)
What the shit, who is this guy
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Vaynerchuk
― markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:44 (thirteen years ago)
i like him
and an author and public speaker on the subjects of social media, brand building and e-commerce
― 'scuse me while i make the sky cum (k3vin k.), Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:50 (thirteen years ago)
[insert canks thumbs up emoticon here]
― markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:51 (thirteen years ago)
Gary Vaynerchuk's 101 Wines: Guaranteed to Inspire, Delight, and Bring Thunder to Your World (2008)Crush It!: Why NOW Is the Time to Cash In on Your Passion (2009)The Thank You Economy (2011)Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook (2013)
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:56 (thirteen years ago)
Pitchfork style:
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2013/06/26/at-pitchfork-office-style-goes-formal-only-one-day-a-year/tab/interactive/
― geeta, Wednesday, 26 June 2013 20:40 (twelve years ago)
https://twitter.com/ZombyMusic/status/351754780122693633
― markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:44 (twelve years ago)
https://twitter.com/ZombyMusic
― markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:48 (twelve years ago)
Michael Renaud needs to have words with whoever did the wallpapering ...
― mark e, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:59 (twelve years ago)
not exactly sure what he's ranting on about, but i definitely noticed the drukqs influence on his new record
― diamonddave85, Monday, 1 July 2013 18:07 (twelve years ago)
he deleted hte tweets lol
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Monday, 1 July 2013 18:46 (twelve years ago)
why
― markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 18:47 (twelve years ago)
if someone at pfm is reading this thread, can you get us an rss feed for "the pitch"?
― markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:08 (twelve years ago)
wait, i think i figured it out based on yr other rss feeds
― markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:10 (twelve years ago)
http://pitchfork.com/rss/thepitch/
― markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)
jfuckinc, isn't there such a thing as too much content?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:15 (twelve years ago)
Probably so, but since I ignore a good half of what they have on offer, The Pitch seems like something they should've done and prioritized a long time ago.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:16 (twelve years ago)
lol, still no comments allowed?
― wk, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 18:43 (twelve years ago)
I love that every time they make a point of bringing back the mailbag feature, they do about one column of answers (maybe two) and then it goes away until the next time it's launched.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 18:44 (twelve years ago)
No comments is always the correct decision
― Simon H., Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:05 (twelve years ago)
― tight in the runs (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:18 (twelve years ago)
yup
― flopson, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:20 (twelve years ago)
always
― marcos, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:20 (twelve years ago)
ilx inclusive
― how bad could it be to be stuck to the couch, forever... (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:21 (twelve years ago)
no comment
― wk, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:28 (twelve years ago)
“It’s a crowd that doesn’t care. I don’t mean they don’t care in they don’t take issues of sexual violence seriously,” Neal said. “But that’s not their relationship with R. Kelly, opposed to black audiences who are conflicted about him but who have also been following him for 20 years. Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah is.”
http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/music/21360770-421/r-kelly-believes-he-can-fly.html
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 14:08 (twelve years ago)
Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah is.”
Them's fightin' words!
maybe younger kids but i was watching "are you that somebody" on mtv in 1998 or whenever that video was on.
― markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:00 (twelve years ago)
i knew who she was before i knew what pitchfork was
― markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:01 (twelve years ago)
same here
― marcos, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:01 (twelve years ago)
hipsters not knowing -- or caring -- who aaliyah was might have been true.... maybe 5 years ago
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:02 (twelve years ago)
How about hipsters not knowing what Pitchfork is?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:03 (twelve years ago)
Why more then than now? Shouldn't it be opposite?
― Evan, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:04 (twelve years ago)
DeRo is going nuts about this R. Kelly thing. Just check his blog, pretty much every recent entry is about it:
http://www.wbez.org/blogs/jim-derogatis
― Position Position, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:18 (twelve years ago)
aaliyah is total hipster canon.
― rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:25 (twelve years ago)
Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah iscan't name any deep Brandy album cuts.
― mimicking regular benevloent (sic) users' names (President Keyes), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:46 (twelve years ago)
off the top of my head, the only brandy song period i can name is "that boy is mind," a song i also experienced via mtv
― markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)
boy is mine obv
they played the shit out of that
If the majority of festival attendees in any given year are in their 20s (a reasonable assumption, I think), the 20-something Pitchfork hipsters of 2013 are likelier to have experienced Aaliyah as a childhood radio staple than the 20-something Pitchfork hipsters of 2008, the older ones of which may have already abandoned top-40 radio for less-mainstream fare by the time Aaliyah became popular. (Raises hand.)
Also, Aaliyah seems to be trendier than she was 5 years ago, with various strains of "hipster R&B" citing her as an influence and last year's Katy B/Jessie Ware song "Aaliyah" getting Pitchfork props. (Not to mention her music recently being coopted by mainstream artists such as Drake and Chris Brown in obvious bids for coolness.)
― jaymc, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:08 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, XX all up in that.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:12 (twelve years ago)
Oh yeah.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:15 (twelve years ago)