Espers II

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Holly shit! this new espers is amazing! wtf!

marybeth, Monday, 6 March 2006 07:46 (nineteen years ago)

new one is such a great leap from all that they've done in the past. woweee zoweee

amazinggrace, Monday, 6 March 2006 07:47 (nineteen years ago)

thirded, much louder. saw them saturday and they played 'Mansfield and Cyclops' or something. very good

rizzx, Monday, 6 March 2006 08:25 (nineteen years ago)

what I wrote about it on the rolling country (!?) thread:

New Espers CD is definitely pretty as it should be, and definitely Fairport Convention folk-drone, but not really with songs, and not really country. Belongs more on the psychedelic drone thread, but that thread's a bore. I never heard their first one (assuming this is their second), but they don't really seem like a band you'd need more than one CD by anyway.
(and there's something amusing and maybe even audacious and Espers opening their album with "Variation on a Guitar Progression out of 'Stairway to Heaven,'" except they call it "Dead Queen" instead.)
-- xhuxk (xedd...), February 25th, 2006.

xhuxk, Monday, 6 March 2006 15:16 (nineteen years ago)

I really must get this. (I've liked Greg Weeks's stuff but have never actually heard much Espers outside of a few songs.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

It's a very good album, I think you will like it a LOT, Ned.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

Well, yes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

Espers are like my standard reference for shitty new folk, so if this album is as good as y'all are saying, i will be very pleasantly surprised indeed. their first release + live gig in Edinburgh = dull and fiercely middling.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

is this the weed tree or something even newer?

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

Its Espers - II

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)

i love this too

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 6 March 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

Did this leak already? I'm dying to hear it, don't mind waiting until May though - I always feel weird about jumping onto leaked records. The word on the street here in Philadelphia is that this record is beyond amazing.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 7 March 2006 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
this is a pretty great record.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 24 April 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

Espers is a great name for a band. And II is a great title for an album, so It could probably be a great thing. They're Finnish, right?

strom (strom), Monday, 24 April 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

SO ABSOLUTELY surprisingly awesome. man. i thought i hated Espers.

strom - they are from Philly!

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 24 April 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

I am looking forward to this.

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 24 April 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://myspace-639.vo.llnwd.net/00558/93/60/558520639_l.jpg

greg looks INTENSE.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)

I like Espers, but thought the previous record was sweeter, and hence, I listen to more. what are people latching onto w/this record so much more than the first?

Dominique (dleone), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

When is this out? Or is it already?

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

because the first was snoozin bullshit

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

Espers are like my standard reference for shitty new folk, so if this album is as good as y'all are saying, i will be very pleasantly surprised indeed. their first release + live gig in Edinburgh = dull and fiercely middling.

replace Edinburgh with Los Angeles = OTM
including willingness to be wowed

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 24 April 2006 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

since i'm procrastinating when i should be transcribing...i like it because it's much darker than the first, which i liked. it's a transitional record and the images are pretty grim. we talked about burzum, which was fun!

blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:57 (nineteen years ago)

Thought the first was pleasant enough though not earth-shattering, broke down and grabbed the leak based on this thread and my concern that I might not feel the need to purchase another Espers record....

Annnnd WOW. Four songs in this is an unbelievable step forward for these guys. Darker and tighter, more vivid production. Ballsier songwriting. When the drums (!!!) came in on Widow's Weed it was a shocking, musical-chill producing moment, first because I wasn't expecting drums on an Espers record, and then because of how huge and menacing it sounded. Now, in the middle, they've brightened things up a bit and the Fairport influence is becoming more pronounced. I'm seriously loving this.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 03:07 (nineteen years ago)

I broke down and downloaded it, too. This record is just amazing. I actually prefer The Weed Tree because it appeals more to my tastes, but II is certianly "better", whatever that means. I haven't heard an album in recent years that feels like some sort of complete story, with images and chapters moved through from song to song. I also tend to like shorter songs better, but this is full of longer ones and they sustain all the way though, never feeling like things are getting too long or boring. I'm really excited for them! I see them at various Philly haunts and alway want to high-five them, but feel like I'd seem a creep.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

What is their live show like nowadays? I've always liked their records, but their live show has always made me sigh and think: "This is a studio band." Which isn't bad, I just want them to prove me wrong.

trees (treesessplode), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, make sure you dont tell them you downloaded the record. they're having a hard time with this particular aspect of the biz.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)

live show was really lame last time i saw them. the songs didn't gel and it felt really meandering.

this in STARK contrast to their amazingness of their new album: it's marvelous. (and dear band: i would never have heard it, let alone be buying and pitching it for magazine features and stuff, if i had not downloaded the thing.)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:39 (nineteen years ago)

I've seen them go both ways live. One show i saw was incredible, they sounded so together and fluid and just amazing. They blew away a room packed with people. Another time was so-so, standard decent performance with some great moments. I saw them sort of tank, too, at least to me. just messy and sounding unrehearsed. Each time i saw them there was way too much tuning and menadering beween songs, but the great show i saw at a plantearium had some interlude music that made it all gel.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 25 April 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

I just got some info for thier Philly record release show and figured I'd share it on here. Sounds fun.

ESPERS II (Drag City) record release show!
w/ Currituck County and Lexie Mountain
Saturday, May 6
8pm
@ Lithuanian Music Hall
2715 E. Allegheny Ave. (Port Richmond--- Public Transportation by Girard Avenue ..15 Trolley)
de Sixth Borough, PA

$8 suggested donation / all ages / 21+ to drink
sponsored by Arthur Magazine, for more information contact
laris@arthurmag.com / 917-446-3087

Link to directions at http://www.espers.org

Vinyl and CD copies of ESPERS II will be for sale!

Kaleidoscopic projections by Roby Newton of Lexie Mountain Boys!

http://www.espers.org/lithuanianhall/promoposterweb.jpg

peter x (bucksbreeze), Thursday, 4 May 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)

so they're really fake-hippieing it up.

GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know what they're going for, but it sure sounds great.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

I went to the record release show and they sounded GREAT. They had another guitar player in the band, the same guy who played in the Currituck band that opened. It was terrific. They also had the CDs for sale, so I picked up a copy and have been on it nonstop. I need to get a record player because the LP is sequenced differently, and i think the guy selling them said also a diferent master.

They posted a stream of the album on myspace:

http://www.philebrity.com/player.php?AIDL=33&site=PLB

peter x (bucksbreeze), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 12:42 (nineteen years ago)

dude, are you on their street team or something? just suspicous of all your billboarding.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 13:15 (nineteen years ago)

1. Stairway to Heaven
2. White Stripes - Aluminum
3. enya shit
4. chrono trigger theme
5. more wibbly garbage

I give up.

a.b. (alanbanana), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

ILM: Where street teams are met with derision and confusion!

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

Haha...no street team! This is the only webboard I really post on and I don't know half the stuff that is talked about, so most of my posts are about the one band I found this through. But I'm open to getting paid, so let them know I'm spreading the word!!

peter x (bucksbreeze), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

I saw this group live in Philly, years ago before they were on Drag City. They were so very lame!

I've never heard their records

Chris Bee (Cee Bee), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

i saw them several times in philly. once they were awful, tuneless and very indie sounding. next time they sounded great. later a mixture of the two.

GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

I saw them with the Incredible String Band and I thought they were awesome. The show was in a church, appropriately.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

Wow. Listening to this so far, I love it. Thanks for the link.

like murderinging (modestmickey), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
Wow, this is some great Thursday night entertainment. I especially like the Enya comparison. It's pretty interesting to eavesdrop on live show "reviews" cuz only the people that loved the show come up and say as much. Half the time I'm thinking we tanked (though not so much anymore - we've hit our stride live for the first time, feels good). Anyhow, please feel free to high five any esper you see out, even if yr one of the folks who posted that we're rubbish.

By the way, I think the new record sounds great, except for that hippie crap. And the rehash psych nonsense. And all that singing in tune bullshit. And yes, we are Finnish.

Love Greg

Gregory Charles Weeks, esq., Thursday, 1 June 2006 01:03 (nineteen years ago)

Can I post how much I love the album directly after Greg posts in the thread? It does sound great, those things excluded.

Espers plz tour Alaska.

larssen (larssen), Thursday, 1 June 2006 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

i love this album. it's beautiful. anytime espers wants to play on martha's vineyard, lemme know.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

I'm going to high five one of the guys in the band because he works in the same place that i just started temping at.

Anybody familiar with the band Brightblack?

peter x (bucksbreeze), Thursday, 1 June 2006 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

HAHA GREG OMG HI. I would hi-five any of you anytime.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 June 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

Hi Greg, if I make it to the Somerville, MA show i'll high-five EVERY Esper.

Sean Braud1s (Sean Braudis), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

Anyone else hear a lot of Radiohead instrumentals in the album?

Francisco Monar (fmonar), Thursday, 1 June 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)

No, I do not hear that.

"I like Espers, but thought the previous record was sweeter, and hence, I listen to more. what are people latching onto w/this record so much more than the first?"

Listened to both albums back to back, do not hear the sweetness of the first honestly. Both sound bleak in their own ways, but the first thick with its bleakness. I think there is more space in II, while having more instruments and effects. Production sounds great (all of those extra sounds shining nicely) and as sean mentioned, the drums. The songs are still long, but they wander much less. Seems slightly more song oriented and with more peaks, like the drums breaking in track 2. Dark, but quiet and beautiful. "Cruel Storm" is their prettiest song.

Loved the first album, but I think this one has replaced it for me.

larssen (larssen), Friday, 2 June 2006 07:32 (nineteen years ago)

Tell me more about this before I turn into a total freaking hippie.

Free Your Ass (And Your Mind Will Follow) (kate), Monday, 12 June 2006 11:00 (nineteen years ago)

it gives you mental feelings with its heavy sessions.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 12 June 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

Seems slightly more song oriented and with more peaks, like the drums breaking in track 2.

That reminded me a lot of Godspeed You Black Emperor.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 12 June 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

i quite like this. i find a lot of it and the feathers album to tread similar ground though

boonah (boonah), Monday, 12 June 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)

I like it a lot, but it hasn't surpassed the first album. I'm reconciling the fact they've taken a different approach. It will sink in over time, I'm sure.

I just miss the Fresh Maggots-style fuzz guitar tracked over top of every song.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 12 June 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

This album is really drawing me in. I can't stop listening to it. I really love the second song, I think "Widows Weeds" - something about the mix of acoustic twinkling and drizzles of fuzz reminds me of late Bauhaus, Sky's Gone Out era.

Free Your Ass (And Your Mind Will Follow) (kate), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 08:51 (nineteen years ago)

i'm really disappointed in how little critical buzz there is on this record. it's marvelous.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 09:26 (nineteen years ago)

hmmm, i just got the weed tree and i love that (the sleeve notes are entertaining too), the nico and durutti covers esp. so II is looking inevitable. i'm a bit indignant about how this whole beardy freak folk bunch are taking me by stealth.

cw (cww), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:01 (nineteen years ago)

See, I'm finding it strange when people are calling it "new folk" or whatever, because it doesn't really push my folk buttons. It pushes my psych buttons and maybe even my spooky etherial goth buttons.

Sundogs at 22 Degrees (kate), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)

but the songs (chords, vocal style) sound so clearly modeled on britfolk!

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)

well, psychy, baroque etheriel gothy droney folk, basically they sound like a less terrifying comus no?

cw (cww), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)

no.

GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

i mean the herald-y, lighter end of first utterance. not the deranged hey nonooy no freak outs.

cw (cww), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

I'm still loving this album. Weed Tree is my favorite, I'm a sucker for the sad songs. But this is probably the "better" album. I see the record everywhere in local shops and stuff, but I am also suprised that the critics and "hotspots" aren't going wild over this.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:32 (nineteen years ago)

wait, people love it here, don't they? aren't there critics here? i'm not gonna write about it, but i am wild over it. well, okay, not jumping up and down wild, but i do love it. i never heard the first one. it is lovely.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

i somehow managed to not mention the Rennaissance fair in a review:
http://www.citypages.com/databank/27/1331/article14423.asp

imbidimts (imbidimts), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, this one is addictive.

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

Picked this up based on the ILM-buzz and have been playing it back-to-back with the new Six Organs since late last night.

Dan Floss (Dan Floss), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

this is a real pretty album.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

this is what i wanted mi and l'au to be like.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

HI GREG

Now that you're an indie superstar, will my copy of What The Cat Dragged In fetch big money on eBay?

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

Could anybody reccomend solo Greg Weeks recordings, where to start?

peter x (bucksbreeze), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

Greg Weeks solo:

Awake Like Sleep is great. I haven't spent enough time with Blood Is Trouble to give an opinion.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

fire in the arms of the sun, then awake like sleep.

GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)

This is really not bad. Great drumming on Mansfield and Cyclops.

strom (strom), Wednesday, 14 June 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)

i quite like this. it certainly "sounds" great anyway. in some ways i prefer GW's solo stuff. stupidly what i love the most is the band photos under the disc. do they *really* look like that? if so, that's totally awesome.

electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Monday, 19 June 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)

This record is totally Projekt.

adam (adam), Monday, 19 June 2006 01:17 (nineteen years ago)

In a good way.

adam (adam), Monday, 19 June 2006 01:19 (nineteen years ago)

This album would be so much better with a male vocalist.

Lee is Free (Lee is Free), Monday, 19 June 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

That's not true.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

I bought Blood Is Trouble and Awake Like Sleep over the weekend. I like them both, Blood a bit better. I don't think either are as good as the Espers stuff. It seems that all of his good ideas find a perfect home with the full band. I like his voice a lot, but like the girl's voice even better and think he sounds best when in a duet with her.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:28 (nineteen years ago)

This album would be so much better with a male vocalist.

That's the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time.

Insert Clever Screen Name Here (kate), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

Funny, I prefer Greg's voice to Meg's and wish he sang more often in Espers.

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

I saw two shows over the weekend, one in NYC and the other in Philly. The show at the Mercury was just ok. They sounded a bit sloppy and unfocused and everything was too crowded and "jammy". It wasn't bad, though, just got boring at times. They went on late, too. The Philly show was great until some sort of sound problems happened at the end. They recovered, but sort of lost momentum. On a bad night, these guys are still pretty solid.

Brightblack was impressive. Not my thing, but they had a really jazzy feel to them that was cool. All the songs sounded the same, though.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Still fucking great.

ilxor, Saturday, 28 February 2009 05:44 (sixteen years ago)

four months pass...

I just got this album in FOPP for £3! It's a nice listen but, in places, I find the sheer derivativeness of it annoying

Nuts, whole hazelnuts, HEEUUUUUUUURGGHHH! (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 09:53 (fifteen years ago)

Still never heard it. Bought the first album, but that didn't make much of an impression on me, so I've never bothered with II. Did I boob?

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Friday, 24 July 2009 10:01 (fifteen years ago)

It's worth £3

Nuts, whole hazelnuts, HEEUUUUUUUURGGHHH! (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 10:02 (fifteen years ago)

As I said, the Fairport/Fotheringay vibe is a bit silly though

Nuts, whole hazelnuts, HEEUUUUUUUURGGHHH! (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 10:04 (fifteen years ago)

I think I may have been the first person to own this album on vinyl! How's THAT for a claim to fame.

Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Friday, 24 July 2009 10:06 (fifteen years ago)

As these things go, it's probably about a £3 claim to fame.

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Friday, 24 July 2009 10:25 (fifteen years ago)

there's a new Espvall/Batoh album on the way soon (mp3 at Drag City.com) which is pretty sweet.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I was reminded a bit of Ghost on listening to this album

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

I like this one the most! Haven't really felt much of their other stuff. Of course I got into this album about the same time as my delve into Fairport Convention, so Tom D. probably pretty otm.

the sideburns are album-specific (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 24 July 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think they sound too much like Fairport, really, though I'm sure that Espers is well-versed in that band -- I get the Pentangle comparisons ...

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

Oh man, they are totally going for a Sandy Denny thing, as opposed to Fairport per se, on several tracks

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, Sandy Denny, maybe, but Fairport was always waaaaay more of a rock band than people seem to remember.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:08 (fifteen years ago)

This album does sound a bit late-60s British folk-rock, with maybe a bit of an early Black Sabbath gothic vibe thrown in there too. But, hey, those are classic veins well-worth mining, and they take things in enough of a new direction that I have no problem with it. Everything's derivative of something.

o. nate, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

espers basically do a stylized version of brit folk that never actuall existed as far as i can tell.

call all destroyer, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that's sort of a good way of putting it -- even stuff like Comus, which I think espers is going for in terms of vibe, doesn't really *sound* like this.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

My favorite thing this band has doen is the covers ep, The Weed Tree.

Trip Maker, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

yeah comus does come to mind, but comus, pentangle, and obv fairport had musicians that were really comfortable with blues and jazz styles and that influence comes through a lot in their stuff.

call all destroyer, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

^otm^. these guys go for a way darker deep forest gothic vibe and aren't nearly as loose as fairport. not a knock (love espers) but upthread dude complaining that they sound exactly like fairport means you're not really listening to one or the other

kamerad, Friday, 24 July 2009 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

Uhhhhhhhhhhh, where did I say they sounded exactly like Fairport? I think their more Gothic side actually sounds a bit like Popol Vuh. Apologies and all that, but I found the derivativeness of this album a problem.

Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Friday, 24 July 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

derivativeness isn't quite my problem with the band (and I like them fine, don't get me wrong), but it's more sort of a dress-up, play-act-y thing I get from them overall. then again, it's easy to forget that people like Fairport were also kids dressing up as well, at least to some extent ...

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

most music is derivative. i think they ride mellow candle a lot more than fairport/fotheringay but who cares

kamerad, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

i really love this band.

tulsa anti-juggalo league (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

me too. been waiting impatiently since 'the valerie project' for anything new by them

kamerad, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone here check out the Trembling Bells album yet? Same sort of ballpark, but much more of a Steeleye vibe than a Fairport one and they don't have the gauzy haze that the Espers I heard has. Don't love it all, but there's a couple of songs (especially 'Willows of Carbeth') that are just flat out WOW afaic.

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Espers side projects are great too -- that Meg Baird solo album is stellar.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

what's the valeria project?

tulsa anti-juggalo league (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

haven't heard trembling bells, but a steeleye vibe is interesting

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

Trembling Bells myspace

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

valerie project is basically an Espers soundtrack to Valerie and her Week of Wonders, trippy czech cult film from the 70s

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.insound.com/The_Valerie_Project_The_Valerie_Project_2xLP/productmain/p/INS40743/

kamerad, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

woah dang hadn't heard of that! thx for the heads up

tulsa anti-juggalo league (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

it's ok, not amazing ... some parts pretty solid, others kinda tiresome

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

this trembling bells stuff is dece tho the girl thinks she is sandy denny and is definitely not.

call all destroyer, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

lol at the Joe Boyd quote. A blessing from the pope!

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

that Meg Baird solo album is stellar.

yes!

velko, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

also yes!

I love Espers II but not the other Espers stuff. Agree it "sounds like i imagine other things sound like" but those things don't actually exist. So well arranged, spooky, rising, great. I bought it on vinyl also!

sean gramophone, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

if anyone's interested here's my interview w/ meg baird from a few years back: http://www.junkmedia.org/index.php?i=2055

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

nice ali roberts interview there too. he's so slept on still it's pretty sad

kamerad, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

noooo shit. that new album of his is probably one of my top five records thus far this year. maybe top 3! i still need to gather up some of his other recordings, I don't think I have it all ...

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

i actually think Ali is a good comparison here -- I get a little more out of him than Espers because he's got a little more warmth/playfulness/humor in his music, which I think is a HUGE, often overlooked part of folk music these days.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

really? found his new one so dull.

(i like Roberts a lot, and absolutely in person, but that's his big problem - too dull!)

sean gramophone, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

i think the only thing i find lacking in this new one is maybe that it's bit less melodically memorable than some of his past stuff. but the lyrics are astounding -- some beautiful, beautiful stuff in there.

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

I've been loving 'Spoils' too. Had neglected Roberts for a few years, now feeling like a big dummy. BTW, he plays with some of the Trembling Bells guys in a band called the Black Flowers. It ain't all that really, but their album's not bad. Versions of 'Calvary Cross' and 'Polly On The Shore' on it, if that gives you a clue as to where they're coming from. It's on eMusic if you're still signed up, Tyler.

Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Friday, 24 July 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

not on emusic anymore, but i'll have to check it out, sounds fun. since we're discussing English-y folk rock here, I may as well post this youtube clip of Richard Thompson & Robyn Hitchcock playing the Incredible String Band last weekend ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gVzYlGFQTE

tylerw, Friday, 24 July 2009 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

looking forward to III. coming out in october. and i don't look forward to anything!

scott seward, Friday, 28 August 2009 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.dragcity.com/system/album_products/images/1515/large.jpg?1250884669

scott seward, Friday, 28 August 2009 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

actually, now i'm thinking i might bug drag city for a copy cuz i don't feel like waiting.

scott seward, Friday, 28 August 2009 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

hot damn, thanks for the news!

kamerad, Friday, 28 August 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

It's on Drag City? Damn. That's not on eMusic, at least in the U.S. market.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 28 August 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

whoa--i listened to ii yesterday having no idea that iii was announced. well if there's any band to have a telepathic moment with...

call all destroyer, Friday, 28 August 2009 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

I hope II gets a mention in some of the best-discs-of-the-decade lists (only the ones that go very deep, say around 200 albums or more; still, it's a very good, and underappreciated, disc).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 28 August 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

yeah listening to it the whole way through for the first time in ages it is really, really excellent.

call all destroyer, Friday, 28 August 2009 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

i am looking closely at the cover up there, and seeing, what? a ninja academy? maybe kurihara is guesting

kamerad, Friday, 28 August 2009 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

I have been stuck on The Weed Tree cause I love it so much, but this is a good incentive to revisit II.

lol xp

sleeve, Friday, 28 August 2009 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

sweet! looking forward to this. i did it upthread, but i'll put in another plug for the Batoh/Espvall Overloaded Ark album. so good.

tylerw, Friday, 28 August 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I really need to hear that

sleeve, Friday, 28 August 2009 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

nice mix of free form psych along with some more straightforward folky stuff. the cover of "Sueno Con Serpientes" is incredible -- surely Damon & Naomi are kicking themselves for not getting to it first.

tylerw, Friday, 28 August 2009 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

I have been stuck on The Weed Tree cause I love it so much

Yeah, The Weed Tree is my favorite, which is odd, since it has the most British Folk vibe. I hate most British Folk. But somehow I connect with Espers' spooky take on those types of songs.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 28 August 2009 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

two months pass...

espers iii is okay but a bit too pentangle, too much like the weed tree and the valerie whatever, not enough eerie comus, spirogyra, spires in the sunset rise unhinged no-neck blues band trip folk

kamerad, Sunday, 8 November 2009 01:59 (fifteen years ago)

spires that in the sunset rise

kamerad, Sunday, 8 November 2009 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

not enough eerie comus, spirogyra, spires in the sunset rise unhinged no-neck blues band trip folk

uh when did the espers resemble any of those bands

an armada of q-tips (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 8 November 2009 08:49 (fifteen years ago)

espers ii, and parts of the debut. meg baird reminds me a little bit of barbara gaskin

kamerad, Sunday, 8 November 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

think i like III better than the previous ones for the reasons you mention! more Pentanlge/Steeleye kinda stuff, more about songs rather than vibe. also love all all the fuzzy lead guitar.

tylerw, Monday, 9 November 2009 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

it's still a really good album. just wish it were stickier with spooky haunted baroque forest vibes. have you heard greg weeks' recent solo album, the hive, yet? there are some moments that anticipate this new one, i think. like the madonna (!) cover, "borderline"

kamerad, Monday, 9 November 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

hm, didn't even know the Weeks thing existed. I actually have heard very little of his solo stuff ...

tylerw, Monday, 9 November 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

it's pretty good. helena espvall and margaret weinks guest. clips in the link
http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=142668

kamerad, Monday, 9 November 2009 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

espers lite

call all destroyer, Monday, 9 November 2009 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

bummer that the new espers album is so boring. they mostly played it tonight at the bell house, doing older originals only to open and close the set. both those songs were way more exciting and absorbing than anything from iii. still though meg is smoking hot

kamerad, Sunday, 6 December 2009 06:06 (fifteen years ago)

oh, I almost went to that show tonight.
I guess the scene was a bit of a downer due to the news re: Jack Rose.

ian, Sunday, 6 December 2009 06:21 (fifteen years ago)

snow didn't help turnout either. they dedicated the last song of the first set to jack. i hadn't heard the sad news yet

kamerad, Sunday, 6 December 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

six months pass...

just got espers III....wasn't totally feeling it but it might be a grower

m@tt h (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 18 June 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

it's nothing special and a drastic step down in terms of ambition imo

call all destroyer, Friday, 18 June 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

i love this record ... my older brother who is a hardcore steeleye span/fairport dude said it was his fave new record of the last 5 years. he probably only heard about ten new records in the last 5 years but ...

tylerw, Friday, 18 June 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

yeah II is the fucking business, man, honestly might be in my top 10 of the last few years

m@tt h (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 18 June 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

I like III a lot, although I think it's uneven and a bit unsteady at times. I find "Another Moon Song" more memorable than anything from II. I can't quite connect with them doing "loud", I much prefer it when they do "pretty", which explains why I like Weed Tree so much. That said, I think II is a more consistent album even w/o the high points of the latest.

Gonna relisten to II right now, maybe it will change my mind. I can see what cad is saying about it having more ambition, it's definitely an "album" and III doesn't flow the same at all.

bug holocaust (sleeve), Friday, 18 June 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i see that -- i guess what III sounded like to me was a more song-based approach. they could've gone further "out" from II, but sounds like they made the conscious decision to rein things in a little, be more economical.

tylerw, Friday, 18 June 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

also sorta appreciated that there are a few songs here that are almost ... sexy? nto a word i would've used to describe them before.

tylerw, Friday, 18 June 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

i hope i end up liking III, just didn't totally grab me, only listened once.

m@tt h (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 18 June 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

My favorite Espers track has turned out to be their cover of "Flaming Telepaths."

I DRIVE A PORSCHE! WHAT DO YOU DRIVE?! (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Saturday, 19 June 2010 09:09 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.