seven weeks for gnarls barkley at number one. seven...weeks.
this isn't good surely? what does it all mean?
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
OTM
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
When every single is sort of expected to debut at its highest posision, a really good song will not benefit from actually being really good. The best songs need some time to climb the charts.
Not that "Crazy" is good anyway, but still...
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
Maybe not many singles are being sold at the moment so it doesnt take much to be no1.Also maybe not many songs get blanket coverage on all radio so its hard for somethings to get coverage compared to others.Or all the other singles out are shite and no one buys them.
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
I guess when/if the UK eurovision entry wins, it may go wham up the chart. But who knows.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
― J Arthur Rank (Quin Tillian), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― hiod, Monday, 15 May 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
actually yeah i agree with every word of that. but i dont think its a good sign overall for the future. next thing u know we'll have the 1998 phenomenon all over again, which was something like 7 new number ones in a row each for 1 week, each a new entry. that was a lark.
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)
Women 'drive online music market'Woman with MP3 playerMusic download sales are boomingTechnology-savvy women are driving the increase in digital music sales, according to a report.
More than three quarters of women aged 16-45 in the UK now own an MP3 player or mobile phone that plays MP3s, research by media group Emap found.
The report said women spend longer listening to music than men, discover more music and listen to more podcasts.
Sophie Watson Smyth of music magazine Q said the internet gave women the freedom to widen their musical tastes.
The digital music market is booming, with download sales up more than 150% in the first three months of the year, compared with the same period in 2005.
Women are now confidently downloading music at home and broadening their musical horizons in privateSophie Watson SmythMarketing manager, Q and MojoSome 80% of women spend now more time listening to music than they did before they got their MP3 player - compared with 75% of men, according to Emap.
Eight out of 10 also say they have rediscovered lots of old artists and albums, compared with 72% of men.
And 72% of women say they spend more time on the internet looking for new music, 7% higher than the figure for men.
Emap said the popularity of downloading music was behind a boom in the number of women reading music magazines.
Freedom
For the first time, more women are reading are reading metal magazine Kerrang than men, while almost half of Q's under-30 readership is now female.
Ms Watson Smyth said: "The freedom afforded by new technology means that women are now confidently downloading music at home and broadening their musical horizons in private.
"Technology has changed how women approach music and we are seeing increasing numbers turning to music magazines for expert guidance and edited choice in the cluttered world."
Emap's report was based on a survey of 1,800 adults between August and September last year.
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)
well this had been the standard for the first five years of the 00s really, if not the five before that as well. it's likely that when Barkely is toppled there will be a bunch of one weekers tho yeah.
An M Carlin of S London wrote some good stuff on 'Crazy', it's significance (projected) and position as well as it's nature as a song.
I still sort of like the idea of it as indicative of a Top 40 supernova/implosion though. The last #1 ever. Of course this won't happen. But it appeals for some reason. Probably because I really don't look at the charts anymore tho it took a long fallout period to reach this stage. No TOTP. No charts (the only way I know what they look like now is thru ILM). No radio. No magazines. I live my life without all these things now. It seems good to move on, away from them, at least for a while. It's odd, thinking about it, but seems okay. I don't miss them that much. Internet has replaced them in many ways of course.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)
And oh look, Razorlight are on the Radio 1 playlist two months before the release of their new single. Joy.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
playlisting that far ahead so as to give singles a longer lease of life supposedly.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
(nb: I think it's ok but no more; cee-lo's vocal performance deserves a better producer than boring danger mouse)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 15 May 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
(one unrelated point i'm completely mystified on - i don't know ANYONE who downloads legally. they either download illegally, or they don't download. who the fuck are these people?)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― gah, Monday, 15 May 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)
Lex, they are the MP-She Generation. You are so out of the loop.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
i am guessing you don't socialize with the kind of people who say "oh where can i download that song by snow patrol i just heard on radio 2?" and then consult q magazine for answer.
― pscott (elwisty), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
i download legally from Bleep because:
a) great, weird stuff that's hard to find elsewhere (Ryan Teague, Bibio, El Perro Del Mar, Paul D Miller, Virus Syn, rare Isolee, Fairmont, Bob McFadden and other ace people you've never heard of) unless you sift for ages
b) 50% goes to the artists
c) DRM-free, meaning you can play it on anything, and it's usually 320kbps now so the quality is as good as can be whilst still compressed and tagged.
d) this sort of thing needs support from digital music-lovers
e) i am having it off with the creators of Bleep, obv.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
The Pussycat Dolls? Well done!
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 15 May 2006 16:36 (nineteen years ago)
― js (honestengine), Monday, 15 May 2006 20:20 (nineteen years ago)
Sadly it wouldn't. Because the kids would think he's "old", and they seem to be more preoccupied with the age, looks and image of the performer than the actual quality of the music.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 May 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
Btw. there are 20 singles throughout UK chart history that have topped the charts for longer than "Crazy", and there seemed to be around 10-15 singles that did also top them for 7 weeks.
7 weeks is not dramatic. It is kind of the way it is supposed to be. One new chart topper each week is a sign of bad quality, which was also the case when the likes of Bryan Adams, Wet Wet Wet, Whitney Houston, Boyz II Men and Mariah Carey stayed on top of the UK or US charts forever back in the early to mid 90s.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 May 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 15 May 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
This is the record we need released:
Been out all night, I needed a biteI thought I'd put a record onI reached for the one with the ultra-modern labelAnd wondered where the light had goneIt had a futuristic coverLifted straight from Buck RogersThe record was so black it had to be a conThe autochanger switched as I filled my sandwichAnd futuristic sounds warbled off and onChorus :The Black Hit Of SpaceIt's the one without a faceIt's the one that doesn't fitYou can only see the flipThe Black Hit Of SpaceSucking in the human raceHow can it stay at the topWhen it's swallowed all the shops?As the song climbed the chartsThe others disappeared'Til there was nothing but it left to buyIt got to number oneThen into minus figuresThough nobody could understand why(Chorus)I couldn't stand this bland sound any more so I walked towards my deck toturn it off. All I could see was the B-side of the disc which had assumed adoughnut shape with the label on the outside rim. I reached for the armwhich was less than one micron long but weighed more than Saturn and timestood still. I knew I had to escape but every time I tried to flee, therecord was in front of me.The Black Hit Of SpaceGet James Burke on the caseIt's the hit that's never goneTime stops when you put it...
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 15 May 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 15 May 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Siegbran (eofor), Monday, 15 May 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 15 May 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
I download through Bleep, Beatport, Dancetracks, Kompakt and others on a weekly basis. It makes a lot more sense to buy a 320K rip of a tune for $1.50-$2.50 than to pay $12 for an import single. Plus, you can hear a big difference between a crappy 192K P2P rip and a 320K rip from a legitimate source when you play tunes on a club system.
― jeffery (jeffery), Monday, 15 May 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding World Cup World CupDing ding ding ding ding ding ding dingWorld Cup World Cup
The great thing is, it doesn't need any work.
I would like to legally download huge great 20 minute krautrock tracks. Is this possible?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Action Tim Vision (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:09 (nineteen years ago)
so long-running No 1s are a sign of good quality (eg Wet Wet Wet in the UK), but a No 1 each week is a sign of bad quality (eg Wet Wet Wet in the US)???
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:17 (nineteen years ago)
is the milian single out properly yet? the milian single has made me reassess her as the greatest artist this century has yet produced.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Action Tim Vision (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:34 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:36 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:16 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:19 (nineteen years ago)
I predict Marcello is mildly embarrassed by this in five years time. It's a pretty good song - the production is really plodding, I think, the kind of thing everyone likes a bit (whereas everyone LOVES other Song Xs, viz "Hung Up")
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:23 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:27 (nineteen years ago)
(xpost, obv)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:27 (nineteen years ago)
I can't even see how it's bigger than something like "Hey Ya".
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)
and then two years later you remember you awesome they were, plus with added nostalgia value.
i do actually think 'crazy' is a genuine Song X! i think the production is crap BUT compared with the bluntian acoustica and britrock revival drivel which is getting all the attention at the moment, it's veritably neptunes-esque. and for the casual consumer (who are the ones who really drive Song Xs) that's what probably appeals.
also i don't think we can overlook cee-lo's voice, that really is amazing.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:32 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:40 (nineteen years ago)
when people say this song is plodding, what do they mean? the tempo? it's 'Da Funk' speed so does 'Da Funk' plod too? 'Da Funk' sounds 'madder' i suppose, 'ironically'. but 'Crazy' is a SONG. it's not meant to be 'Hey Ya', and the backlash on that was pretty severe. 'Crazy's success is a huge surprise i think, despite what Ronan says being correct re catchiness/Hornby-approval).
DM does some nice stuff with the moody strings and choiri think, esp. changing ther notes around on Cee-Lo's second verse.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 09:45 (nineteen years ago)
Where does "Where Is The Love?" feature in all this?
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:02 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:05 (nineteen years ago)
There's studium mass appeal and there's punctum mass appeal.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Action Tim Vision (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:24 (nineteen years ago)
Song Xs usually happen in the summer.
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Action Tim Vision (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)
they were both song x!
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)
('1 thing' is a Song X too)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:45 (nineteen years ago)
And, alright, go on then: what was the last non cough cough "urban" Song X?
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 10:48 (nineteen years ago)
Also don't some songs have a longer radio life/period of popularity that isn't reflected by chart position?
― permanent revolution (cis), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)
1. Uptown Top-Ranking2. Wuthering Heights3. Sugar Baby Love4. West-End Girls5. You To Me Are Everything6. Are Friends Electric?7. Geno8. You Really Got Me9. Blockbuster10.Everlasting Love11. Hot Love12. Jumping Jack Flash13. Israelites14. Rock Your Baby15. Video Killed The Radio Star16. Like A Prayer17. Double Barrel18. Dancing Queen19. The Sun Aint Gonna Shine Anymore20. Ashes To Ashes
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:29 (nineteen years ago)
Dr C, we need to chat.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Action Tim Vision (noodle vague), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:11 (nineteen years ago)
― zebedee (zebedee), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Co (Markco), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:18 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:19 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:24 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:28 (nineteen years ago)
― the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:30 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:34 (nineteen years ago)
Shit, it appears you are right Marcello. Although I was only 4 in '74 so have no real time memory of the record being in the charts. I was convinced that I'd heard it was a chart topper. Ashes To Ashes can stay then.
Actually, no, replace it with Sugar Sugar or I Heard It Through The Grapevine.
― Venga (Venga), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 12:40 (nineteen years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 13:20 (nineteen years ago)
(nme news :)
The track - by duo Cee-Lo and Danger Mouse - is now the most successful single released in Britain in over a decade, beating Tony Christie's '(Is This The Way To) Amarillo' which clocked-up seven weeks at number one last year.
Wet Wet Wet's chart topper 'Love Is All Around' is now ahead of Gnarls Barkley in recent chart history with its 15 weeks at number one in 1994.
http://www.nme.com/news/gnarls-barkley/23123
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:44 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:48 (nineteen years ago)
Amber and Alice were kinda 'unbothered' about it. So, the kids are alright.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)
why is christina milian not going to no 1?
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)
Death to those who have a mortgage.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 22 May 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)
-- The Lex (alex.macpherso...), May 22nd, 2006.
cause it's nowhere near as good as everyone on here is saying it is.
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 22 May 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 22 May 2006 11:27 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 11:27 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 11:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 22 May 2006 11:31 (nineteen years ago)
Come on! Milian for No 1!
― Christina Milian Street Team Leader, Monday, 22 May 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
it's going to be number one i reckon. SONG X!
― pisces (piscesx), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 11:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)
sould still be their biggest hit i say. ROCKS was a 7.
tooting basement? that's not real is it?
― pisces (piscesx), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 11:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)
Rhiannaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6899896.stm
make it stop!
― pisces, Sunday, 15 July 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)
why??
― groovemaaan, Sunday, 15 July 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)
"Umbrella" gets actively worse and worse. At this point, I never want to hear it again, especially the fuxxing Chris Brown version.
― The Reverend, Sunday, 15 July 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)
^ this is how i'm starting to feel about 'buy u a drank'
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 15 July 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)
this happened to me last year with "irreplaceable." song makes me want to crash my car.
― Jordan Sargent, Monday, 16 July 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)
nah, 'umbrella' is about as deserving a song as i can imagine for this kind of mammoth chart run. not remotely bored of it either.
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 08:33 (eighteen years ago)
I don't hear it that often to get irritated by it. I like it well enough.
It's more "IS THERE NOTHING ELSE?" for me.
― Mark G, Monday, 16 July 2007 08:44 (eighteen years ago)
Foo Fighters in "vereh old track makes top forty" shokka!
It somehow quietly relieves me to realise I am so out of the loop Ive never heard ANY of these songs (except for "crazy").
― Trayce, Monday, 16 July 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)
i would get tired of it if it weren't for that dynamite jay-z intro.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 08:55 (eighteen years ago)
Kate Nash got jipped. Who else is next??
― pisces, Monday, 16 July 2007 10:06 (eighteen years ago)
!
Freak Like Me is Richard X using the Sugababes to do a legitimate version of his Girls On Top mash-up We Don't Give A Damn About Our Friends - Gary Numan was fine with being sampled for the backing, but Adina Howard refused to clear her vocals, so whoever was in the 'Babes that week just covers the song. It's a very good pop record, probably technically a lot more polished than the mash-up but not as immediate.
Hung Up was huge here, amazed you've not heard this - #49 for the year in 2005 and #38 for 2006. Prominent ABBA sample, co-written and produced by JLC, possibly Madonna's best single ever.
Push The Button is a wilfully inoffensive Sugababes single, musically circular.
I dunno which Christina Milian song they're talking about, may not have heard it.
Hey Ya was ludicrously huge, here's a zillion ILX threads that mention it. Outkast's biggest single ever, off the Andre 3000 half of their split solo quadruple album. Breaks brain to conceive of you never hearing it.
S.O.S. is a big Rihanna single that samples the Soft Cell cover of Tainted Love, you might love or hate it for that.
Da Funk it's impossible you haven't heard. Daft Punk's first international single, flogged on JJJ ten years ago, dog with a boombox in the video, c'mon.
Where Is The Love is a terrible attempt at soulful relevance by Black Eyed Peas.Justin Timberlake sings on it but wouldn't appear in the video. Avoid.
A Little Less Conversation - chart-bothering remix of little-known Elvis song used in Ocean's movie.
You're Beautiful - allegedly ubiquitous post Coldplay/David Gray snorecrooner by James Blunt. I only saw it on chart TV rundowns though. Terrible.
X is by Xzibit, one of the less completely forgettable singles by Rove's non-pal. Not your thing I imagine, but thumbs up from here.
When Doves Cry though is by Prince and his gothiest hit ever. It is completely inconceivable to me that you haven't heard it, but you should check it out now anyway, pretend it's 1984, you'll love it.
Crazy In Love is a huge hit by Beyonce with a splendid guest verse by Jay-Z, built on a 70s soul/funk sample produced by Rich Harrison. It is excellent, you should check it out.
1 Thing is an even better hit by Amerie built on a 70s soul/funk sample produced by Rich Harrison. Still not your thing but so great I hope you would love it anyway.
Ignition (Remix). I bought the album to hear it because of this thread. The combination of the two on the album is one of the greatest musical events of the century. You'd probably hate it. But read the thread.
I Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor is young person's energetic rock music by the Arctic Monkeys. It is not shit, unlike most everything else that fits that description on JJJ's playlists last year, but you're not missing anything.
Love Is All Around was a Wet Wet Wet cover of a Troggs song from some early-90s romcom, maybe Four Weddings and a Funeral. Tedious.
Everything I Do I Do It For You was by Bryan Adams and from some other movie a couple of years before. It's very awful
Buy U A Drank is typical of T-Pain's work, an R&B singer who uses Autotune as a stylistic effect rather than to correct minor errors, but all the time, as part of his style, unlike Cher's Believe. His material is generally slightly tongue-in-cheek, self-mocking sleazy loverman stuff. Fun but utterly disposable, but he's utterly aware of the latter himself. The title tells the story.
Irreplaceable is a rather good break-up-but-I'm-strong-and-moving-on-despite-it-all song performed by Beyonce and written by Ne-Yo. Has a great hook, and a remix with a verse by Ghostface. Give it a listen, you might appreciate right about nowish.
I skipped Dr C's list because I really really assumed you must have too.
― energy flash gordon, Monday, 16 July 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)
great rundown, energy flash!
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 16 July 2007 10:49 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, bloody impressive, amost swaggartian.
― moley, Monday, 16 July 2007 11:01 (eighteen years ago)
indeed
"I dunno which Christina Milian song they're talking about, may not have heard it."
the godhead 'dip it low', prolly.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 11:13 (eighteen years ago)
Okay if Rihanna was to just go on and on and break Bryan Adams' record, would anyone outside ILM, Popjustice and the BBC Entertainment site actually notice?
― Matt DC, Monday, 16 July 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
i don't think the long run is a sign of stagnation. it felt more stagnant when there were 52 no. 1s a year.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
waaht - way to praise the weakest link in the chain. it's so pointless.
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
nah it seemed pointless at first but it's so important and integral to the song's greatness. he's like a town crier sent out in advance to ready everyone for the impending splendour of the song. plus, gives one time to get to the dancefloor innit.
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sarcasm
xpost
hahahahahaha
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
no lex, it's shit. the song is brilliant, but fucking hell jay almost ruins it.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
can't believe Fergie is number 2 with THIRD single from last year's album
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
he's like a town crier sent out in advance to ready everyone for the impending splendour of the song.
he is doing the job of a radio dj.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
there's no way jay almost ruins the song. even if you don't like it it's easy enough to ignore! and it's not it itself which is good, it's the way it gives you time to prepare yourself.
love the lovely fergie ferg, happy she's doing well. it's cos she's supporting timberlake right now innit
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)
i wouldn't say it's integral - the song would be fine without any male vocal presence ala 'Irreplaceable'. i do like the idea of putting a little rap at the start as announcement/warning but not if he's not going to re-appear again later on in the song - and the rap itself seems uninspiring and phoned in (as with several other Jay-Z appearances on tracks over the years inc. 'beware of the boys' and the linkin park stuff)
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)
i would actually quite like it if kate nash topped the charts for 8 straight weeks; it would give me carte blanche to never take any sort of singles chart seriously ever again, and be pretty vocal about it too.
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
possibly Madonna's best single ever.
offtm
― deej, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
steve it's all about the increase in satisfaction gained from both you and your dancing partner being ready, umbrella in hand, on the dancefloor for the line "you had my heart", rather than scrambling for position midway through the first verse
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
i mean obviously it's the least good bit of a song with no actual bad bits
i don't have a dancing partner :/ also i don't think i would ever dance with an umbrella - leave that to the aphex twin
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
kate nash = borderline crush of shame
"lil miss sunshine" makes up for the pointlessness of the intro. It seems almost a certainty that Timbaland and Keri Hilson(!) or Groove Armada and Mutya will knock Rihanna off if not this week then next week, but I don't mind Umbrella's dominance at all. We've had the wettest summer in history and this song is the perfect soundtrack.
― danzig, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
a-m and i did some rather wonderful contemporary interpretative dancing to 'umbrella' centre stage in the vip tent of the wild in the country festival the other weekend
timba and keri?? i love that song alone amidst the dreck which is the rest of the timba album, doesn't seem very number one-ish though. groove armada and mutya does, though it's not as good.
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:13 (eighteen years ago)
kate nash = just jack without the testicle
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
dare i ask what louis thinks of 'umbrella'?
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
off to youtube it is!
actually, i think i might be able to appreciate it. i've discovered, during my work as a chart-pop reviewer for my radio station, that it's possible to give a song a great review even if it isn't my sort of thing, if it does its job well and provides a decent pop experience. i've been known to hand out 5-star reviews to the likes of norah jones and the rapture on this premise. i will admit, quite a lot of stuff still gets one star and a devastating putdown.
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
All of Jay's guest appearances bore me lately. He should just call his next album "Still Rich as Fuck," because that's basically all his verses are about now, and that was a lot more fun to listen to coming from a guy scrapping his way to the top than from a guy who owns a basketball team.
― Hurting 2, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
timbo and keri at number 4 with cd release 2 weeks to go. groove and mutya at number 16 with cd release 2 weeks to go. Timbo and keri seems more likely, even though it doesn't sound number oneish (whatever that means).
― danzig, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
Roman Abramovich is phoning in an intro to the next Beyonce single.
― Matt DC, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
But Louis The Rapture are great!
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
I've not heard Umbrella either.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
kate nash looks kind of girlish.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
she is a girl
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
lex, this song has extremely noticeable distortion guitar. how has it passed the censor's scissors?
actually, it's a lot better than quite a lot of the chart singles i've heard recently. nice keyboard work, decent tune, the occasionally interesting vocal sample, and the aforementioned guitar. not bad!
actually, i was complemented by a man from the distributing company for my Rapture review. i have to say, the song was a heck of a lot better than I expected, and my review reflected my enthusiasm.
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/the-rapture/pieces-of-the-people-we-love.htm
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
maybe R Kelly and Usher can be #1 - it's probably not out until 2009 but the video is quite funny. song is quite bad tho, makes you wish they were just having an actual argument, swearing etc.
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
meanwhile i'll never understand how the same people who would take me to task for not having heard obscure old music, will proudly boast not only that they haven't heard the biggest current radio hit around, but that they're not interested because modern pop music simply isn't good enough for them any more
i mean, it's not as if i listen to radio ever, but do you not have the slightest curiosity about what the new single from a woman with a proven track record of great singles sounds like?
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Mark WILD" <m✧✧✧@wild✧✧✧.c✧✧> To: "'A.J. Mill'" <sa✧✧✧.m✧✧✧@cur1✧✧✧.c✧.u✧> Subject: FW: check this out Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:38:45 -0000
We liked this reaction to The Rapture. Kudos to whoever wrote it!
_____
From: Kr1st3r Gr33r [mailto:kris✧✧✧@wild✧✧✧.c✧✧] Sent: 14 March 2007 15:45 To: D4v1d B4rcl4y; M4rk W0rk W41nwr1ght; D4v3 R0b3rts Subject: check this out
Look at this reaction from one of the student radio stations to the new Rapture single:
The digitised, skeletal percussion that opens 'People Of The Pieces They Love' provides the framework for a magnificently minimal four minutes' worth of electronic pop. With vocals that don't ostentatiously slather themselves all over the song, the synth textures are allowed to dominate, and this is where it becomes apparent that unlike most charting disco-pop bands. The Rapture actually put some sort of an effort in creating a subliminally enjoyable experience, a subtle and nuanced creation that relies as much on the modulation of tone as the sexuality of its lead singer. Not to say that the song doesn't have any immediacy to it; far from intellectualising the whole process into soulless beat-making the Rapture start POTPWL with the simplest of three-note baselines, gradually adding short, unobtrusive guitar samples, backing vocal chants and wobbling synth lines until the vibrating tension reaches an apex and the live drums can kick in, again without massive fanfare but pungently enough to raise the track another level. The bassline throws a couple of curveballs, the synths fragment into a brief outro, and the song ends without fuss. The Rapture, on the strength of this song, aren't here to sloganeer or jump on any passing fad, they're here to give us music that we'll enjoy, music that bears repeating, and above all music that does all the right things. 5 out of 5. CUR, CAMBRIDGE
*bask*
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
Not really, Alex, because my tastes at the moment are diverged massively from chart pop / r'n'b, and with no direct interface with chart pop I've no motivation to keep up for the sake of keeping up. I've abandoned the semi-journalistic impulse to know EVERYTHING that's going on, and instead I'm just investigating deeper the kinds of things I'm already interested in.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
Also Louis totally beware of PR people 'praising' you. Just, y'know. Watch out.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
Also Louis if you like that you'll LOVE the !!! album.=, which is like The Rapture's last album stretched out on psychedelics.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
thanks for the tip...but what are these dangers you speak of?
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
is the danger that thoughtless praise will be received well but an intelligent criticism will be rejected by PR companies?
You are joking, I hope.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
Well, there is that, but I was thinking more that they'd start hawking all types of untold shit at you in the hope that it's up your street, like 13 Senses' PR woman keeps pestering me just because they supported Embrace once.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
?
just seeking a bit of clarification, that's all. apologies if i don't quite live up to your vast cranial intensity.
xpost to he of little patience
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
I've abandoned the semi-journalistic impulse to know EVERYTHING that's going on, and instead I'm just investigating deeper the kinds of things I'm already interested in
i can kind of understand this, because i pass over a mass of stuff without listening too, but i would be a bit afraid of my tastes settling into a rut then.
never ever give your phone number to PRs if you can help it.
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
but i would be a bit afraid of my tastes settling into a rut then
But Lex, don't you have a fairly well-established set of sonic preferences? (I'm not saying this is bad, I have mine after all.)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
Ahem.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
everybody has them
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
Hurrah for us.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)
even i've heard 'umbrella'.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah but I live in the sticks, innit.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
me too holmes
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
Not THAT far out, though?
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
naw. but you are probably closer to barbados than i am.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
And New York.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 16 July 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
quitney's home and uni locations are the exact reverse of mine AFAIK
― Just got offed, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)
it's complicated.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 16:21 (eighteen years ago)
if you're undecided about killing yourself, the comments box here should help you:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/07/why_i_still_love_rihannas_umbr.html
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
Though the one YouTube link at the end there to "We Need a Resolution" was highly welcome.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)
Dorian looks very different to how i imagined - younger and snazzier
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)
who could be embarrassed by 'umbrella'? "this country".
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)
i'm glad 'they' failed to get Oasis 'Roll With It' to #1. people are now trying it with the Spice Girls 'Stop' so i heard the other week.
it's nearly 20 years since 'Anitina (The First Time I See She Dance)' was #1 - maybe we can all download that back to the top spot
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)
Hahaha. Nice.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 16 July 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)
the top ten of ten years ago vs this week's:
1. Puff Daddy And Faith Evans - I'll Be Missing You - never liked it for reasons that should be obvious (to all but the lex maybe) - certainly not as good as 'Umbrella'
2. Oasis - D'You Know What I Mean? thing is i often do quite like big stupid epic rocky crap - this is mid-table in Oasis song league - NWA/Amen Brother drum sample = can't really hear it so whatever but it's more about the psychey guitars at the end - but probably not as good as 'Big Girls Don't Cry'
3. Gala - Freed From Desire great tune, especially the definitive remix version by Mr Jack (who became Junior Jack according to discogs!) which is the epitomy of 1997 house music made in America (or so it sounds) for Ibiza. much much better than 'Foundations'
4. Coolio Featuring 40 Thevz - C U When U Get There kinda cute and fun enough but what was the point of '40 Thevz'? OK but not as good as 'The Way I Are' is it
5. Ultra Nate - Free if there was a more ambient mix where the guitar licks and strings just carried on for ages without the beat or vocals i'd like that. perhaps controversially i prefer the Arctic Monkeys single tho it's v close call.
6. Sash! Featuring Rodriguez - Ecuador nothing to his debut single but still better than an Avril ballad, just
7. The Seahorses - Blinded By The Sun HATE TEHM DESTROOOY (i heard 'Love Is The Law' for the first time this decade the other week), landslide win for NRQ and his ping pongs
8. Robbie Williams - Lazy Days one of his best singles, better than 'Worried About Ray' if only because that song features the term 'tippy-toes'
9. Michael Jackson - History/Ghosts not all that bad - comes down to whether you find Jacko scarier than the 'Teenagers' MCR whine about. MJ wins on penalties.
10. Changing Faces - G.H.E.T.T.O.U.T. best title ever - very R Kels, the template hasn't really moved on in ten years or maybe this was just a little ahead of its time. just as sullen as emo Nats but slinkier and poutier ftw.
1997: 5 (snatching a draw from the jaws of defeat) 2007: 5 (a better top 5 than 97's but let down by the rest)
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)
can we talk about "beautiful girls," the one with that 'SUICIDAL, SUICIDAL' chorus? it is on the radio a million fucking times a day, and it is SO DISGUSTING. i mean, i'm in a bus with my campers (yes, i'm a camp counselor LOL) and these 8 year olds know all the words to this song, going, 'suicidal, suicidal' and i just have no fucking idea how to tell them that it isn't really...well, suicide shouldn't be catchy? why do i object to it so much, other than its crassness?
― the table is the table, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)
it is well-produced, and has some nice weirdo doo-wop infuences that are sort of sweet. but...
― the table is the table, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)
You'd have loved when "Theme from MASH" was number one, then.
― Mark G, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:33 (eighteen years ago)
was gonna say. i think i remember asking someone (my mum maybe) what suicide meant.
― blueski, Monday, 16 July 2007 23:34 (eighteen years ago)
I still expect Mr Lynskey to look like this; http://www.woodland-trust.org.uk/celebrities/images/ljoseph.jpg
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 06:24 (eighteen years ago)
It seems downloading has caused the charts to go slower. For some reason, people seem to wait longer before they download a song than before they buy the single.
Of course, the unnaturally fast UK charts of a few years ago were a result of this stupid policy to let singles cost less in their first week than in the rest of its life, meaning a single's highest chart position would usually be an indication of how well people liked the previous hit from the same act.
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 07:55 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, but that was to make the record 'ship' faster.
If all the sales happen in one week, the distribution of the single would happen once only.
Now, it's back to how stuff'd move around the chart, like the sixties, almost!
― Mark G, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 08:04 (eighteen years ago)
I think it's a good thing. The fast turnover of the late 90s was pointless, and gave very little space for the better songs, which would usually develop over time rather than race into the charts in their first week.
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 08:16 (eighteen years ago)
--
that can't be right can it? i'm prepared to believe it but it can't be 'right' right?
― pisces, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 09:42 (eighteen years ago)
i think southall and matt dc are kind of right. umbrella is a good song, very good but it doesn't seem like a 9 week smash. it doesn't seem to have the all ages appeal of the likes of "crazy" or "i don't feel like dancing", the stuff that straddles radios 1 and 2. it's definitely in the blockbuster bracket of "sexyback" and "maneater" but neither of them spent so long at number one. i guess you'd have to see the sales figures but it's hard to know if it's the song itself or just paucity of competition that's giving it such a long run. if it's the song itself i guess that the big selling point is that it sort of combines the attributes of a "banger" and a "ballad" but by that reasoning “my love” would have been number one for nine weeks. possibly.
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:02 (eighteen years ago)
How am I right?! My entire contribution is along the lines of "not heard it, more into postrock than chartpop"?!
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
you are right in that it's very easy not to be aware of its existence.
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:06 (eighteen years ago)
Aha.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)
well it would be be if you preferred postrock to chartpop but otherwise waht
but by that reasoning “my love” would have been number one for nine weeks. possibly.
second single off released album, not released in Summer iirc, nowhere near as 'epic' sounding as 'Umbrella'.
― blueski, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:34 (eighteen years ago)
it just doesn't seem very pervasive, admittedly when i come to think of it i have heard it in shops and a couple of tv idents. this measure the success of a song by how many times i hear it in a week idea may not be very useful tbh thou. also rihanna doesn't seem to be in the press that much. not being british puts her at one remove and she has yet to be a beyonce style megastar. possibly kind of hard to write broadsheet articles on. she was at live earth wasn't she?
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:50 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, she was in Tokyo.
― 2for25, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:55 (eighteen years ago)
gnarls barkley were hardly megastars either
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 10:57 (eighteen years ago)
but perhaps a lot easier to write about
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)
Definitely. They had the whole 'first download #1' thing as well as being ex-celeb / trendy producer.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:03 (eighteen years ago)
not easier to write about either, unless you need a gimmicky angle entirely unrelated to the music in order to profile an artist
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)
and i'm aware that many do need this hook, but that's not my problem, and nor should it be yours
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:10 (eighteen years ago)
sure, i agree but as you say lots of writing does work this way. it's the paris/jarvis thing, the press often needs a gimmick to get in. i don't how this stuff works, is this to do with how articles are pitched?
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:16 (eighteen years ago)
it deserves to be number one for this long.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:23 (eighteen years ago)
okay maybe not 9 weeks - it doesnt mean much beyond being a great song, but maybe thats enough these days.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:24 (eighteen years ago)
"http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/07/why_i_still_love_rihannas_umbr.html"
thats one of the worst pics of rihanna ive seen.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
That eh eh eh bit of Umbrella unfortunately reminds me of the eh eh eh bit in Zombie by the cranberries, after which there's no hope for the song.
I miss CD UK and TotP. It is like chart pop is another genre that you have to keep up with, rather than just being the default that's always there.
― Jamie T Smith, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)
Now that strikes me as a very salient point. What's chart pop's presence on mainstream TV now? There isn't really any, is there?
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)
Gentrification, "Coffee Table", the 90s, Broadsheets, False Consensus and "The New Punk Rock"
― acrobat, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
I keep reading this thread title as "the charts are staggering again" and thinking Britney was spotted drunk or something.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
No One Admits To Singing, Writing, Producing Nation's No. 1 Song
― darin, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)
landslide win for NRQ and his ping pongs
waht
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
what are your 11 favourite songs of the moment, fuck
― blueski, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
i think 'my love' is less likeable than 'umbrella'. i think it's a sad thing that cynical bullshit like 'don't feel like dancing' is deemed more family-friendly now. 'umbrella' is the only actual song out of the ones acrobat named. do people no longer value that?
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
grace jones 'pull up to the bumper' (12") prince 'i feel for you' ciara 'oh' rihanna 'umbrella' television 'see no evil' nico 'i'll keep it with mine' bass-o-matic 'fascinating rhythm' ... oh BOTHERED
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
Ban That one guy that hit it and quit it.
― 597, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
Ban Don Derun.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
good effort brau
― blueski, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
typing out most recently played off itunes is not what ilx is for.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
if i MUST discuss popular music with you year after year it helps to establish occasionally an understanding of your preferences in the contemporary domain of said medium.
― blueski, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
i basically have a preference for things i hear and like. fortunately most bands do something to piss me off before i need to hear them. this saves time.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
i basically have a preference for things i hear and like
illuminating
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
18 weeks - Frankie Laine, I Believe (1953) 16 weeks - Bryan Adams, (Everything I Do) I Do It For You (1991) 15 weeks - Wet Wet Wet, Love Is All Around (1994) 11 weeks - Slim Whitman, Rose Marie (1955) 10 weeks - David Whitfield, Cara Mia (1954) 10 weeks - Whitney Houston, I Will Always Love You (1992)
Source: Official UK Charts Company
ella, ella, ella, ey-ey-ey
― pisces, Sunday, 22 July 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)
7 weeks at number 1 for Mark Ronson in the Uk.
― piscesx, Monday, 2 February 2015 23:37 (eleven years ago)
8 long weeks for Drake at number 1. 8 weeks!? longest run for a single in 9 years.
― piscesx, Monday, 6 June 2016 11:18 (nine years ago)
How does it go?
― Mark G, Monday, 6 June 2016 11:48 (nine years ago)
I can't remember the last time I paid attention to the charts... probably about 10 years ago or something. I always took more notice of the album chart, too.
― Turrican, Monday, 6 June 2016 18:16 (nine years ago)
It's been a minute for me, too. Are Wilson Phillips and Boyz II Men still a thing?
― What's Your Definition of a Dirty Baby? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 June 2016 18:20 (nine years ago)
they're triple dating.
― De La Soul is no Major Lazer (ulysses), Monday, 6 June 2016 18:27 (nine years ago)
did "the sign" finally fall off the charts?
― hypnic jerk (rushomancy), Monday, 6 June 2016 19:35 (nine years ago)
There's a special hell somewhere where that fucking Bryan Adams song is still number one, I'm sure.
― Turrican, Monday, 6 June 2016 23:30 (nine years ago)
this is nuts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-36794105
Drake's single only topped the sales-only chart in the first three weeks of its reign. It's only the inclusion of streaming data (where 100 plays count as one sale) that has given him a lock on the number one spot. And that's something that's starting to worry the music industry, because now that the charts measure consumption rather than purchases, they have practically ground to a halt.
In the first six months of 2016, there were 86 new entries in the UK singles chart. Ten years ago, that figure was 230.
― piscesx, Sunday, 17 July 2016 20:00 (nine years ago)
I noticed the other week that the top eight singles in the UK didn't change (not even order) over two weeks, which is... strange.
― boxedjoy, Sunday, 17 July 2016 20:27 (nine years ago)
ten years ago the number of new entries only spending one week on the chart was probably also super high, so no use pretending the chart was problem-free then either. even 'big' hits would frequently enter at their peak and spend a pitifully short time in the top 10 for the majority of the digital music era until recently.
it's pretty common for the industry to have to adjust how it works its product after the charts undergo semi-radical methodological revisions. when soundscan and broadcast data systems numbers were first implemented for the hot 100 in 1991, the main finding was that, on the radio and retail sides, the strongest hits were both breaking much faster and sticking around much longer than would have been reflected by the old survey-based methodology. in order to keep 'playing the charts' as an effective means of marketing singles, some in the industry tried a bizarre series of strategies to try to manipulate the new methodology in their favor. others realized they could market songs to radio, and their parent albums to consumers, without the assistance of singles retail whatsoever. the result was that the hot 100 was both more and less representative of the current state of pop singles consumption for the greater part of the entire 1990s decade. by the time things were 'figured out' (around 1999) and the charts started seeing decent turnaround of singles that were actually popular, not just popular because labels wanted them to appear as such, the singles retail market was in its death throes due to the combination of unsustainable strategies the labels had assumed during those years.
i think this time around the industry won't have to bumble around as long to figure it out. or at least i hope. (they may very well kill the digital downloads market, though. r.i.p. itunes!)
― dyl, Sunday, 17 July 2016 22:40 (nine years ago)
Ed Sheeran. Number 1 AND 2 for 5 weeks straight.
― piscesx, Friday, 10 February 2017 21:39 (nine years ago)
His music's always been piss and shit, tbf.
― Working night & day, I tried to stay awake... (Turrican), Friday, 10 February 2017 21:40 (nine years ago)
Interesting thread here:
In a fitting end to the 2010s, Jeff Bezos is responsible for the last Number 1 Single of the year, Ellie Goulding's "River" (by Joni Mitchell).Here's how:1. You can't find it on Spotify, Apple, Google.2. That's because - aside from Youtube - it's Amazon exclusive.and...— dan barker (@danbarker) December 28, 2019
― groovypanda, Sunday, 29 December 2019 22:48 (six years ago)
wow, hadn't heard anything about that! Crazy story!
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Monday, 30 December 2019 02:25 (six years ago)
it was posted in the system glitch thread
― dyl, Monday, 30 December 2019 04:03 (six years ago)
https://www.billboard.com/charts/decade-end/hot-rock-songs
― j., Monday, 30 December 2019 05:34 (six years ago)
that's pretty grim. i can only handle about four of the top twenty.
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Monday, 30 December 2019 05:38 (six years ago)