I think we can agree that this is the NYTimes's real clueless blunder of the week (Klosterman on Danger Mouse)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/magazine/18barkley.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

The D.J. Auteur
By CHUCK KLOSTERMAN

North Hollywood sounds like a place that could be glamorous or, at the very least, mildly attractive. It is not. Or at least it's not on Hinds Avenue, where dirty one-story buildings look semideserted and many of the local "beautiful people" appear to have jobs that involve (a) ripping apart used cars and (b) selling those individual parts to less-beautiful people whose cars are even more used. Nobody on this North Hollywood avenue looks famous, and a few of them look terrifying. But it just so happens that 7325 Hinds Avenue is the geographic location of Power Plant Studios, and inside those nondescript walls a human named Danger Mouse is talking about an album that has just sold 91,000 copies in England within the span of seven days. Danger Mouse doesn't look famous, either; he also doesn't look dangerous, or even rodentesque. And even though I am asking him about music, he is talking about movies.

"What changed everything was when I got into Woody Allen," says Danger Mouse, whose real name is Brian Burton. He is sitting on a couch in the Power Plant lounge, eating two different kinds of pizza and drinking Vitamin Water; his legs and arms are folded like a mantis's. There is a massive flat-screen TV in the room that's tuned to the TV Guide Channel, but the volume is off. "When I got to college, I saw 'Manhattan' and 'Deconstructing Harry.' I thought to myself: Why do I relate so much to this white 60-year-old Jewish guy? Why do I understand his neurosis? So I just started watching all of his movies. And what I realized is that they worked because Woody Allen was an auteur: he did his Thing, and that particular Thing was completely his own. That's what I decided to do with music. I want to create a director's role within music, which is what I tried to do on this album."

If you know who Danger Mouse is (which is totally possible, considering the commercial potential of the record we're discussing and the illegal things he's done in the past), these sentiments probably make sense immediately. If you have no idea who Danger Mouse is (which is just as plausible, considering the nature of pop music), they will require a little context before it becomes apparent how a record producer's greatest musical influence could be the man who made "Hannah and Her Sisters." But here's the bottom line, regardless of how much you know about Brian Burton: The musical object in question, "St. Elsewhere," by Gnarls Barkley, is an unlikely fusion of alternative pop, psychedelic R&B and postmodern hip-hop, and it was constructed differently from the vast majority of mainstream rock 'n' roll albums. And if "St. Elsewhere" does well over the long haul, its success will be a direct result of the way it was made, a blueprint that contradicts the conventional way in which rock bands are supposed to create music.

When Gnarls Barkley performs live, there are 14 people onstage. Technically, however, Gnarls Barkley is just two people: Danger Mouse (the aforementioned Burton) and an Atlanta-based singer-rapper named Cee-Lo (born Thomas Calloway). But in a larger sense, Gnarls Barkley is really just one person, and that person is Burton. Cee-Lo is essential, but he's essential in the same way Diane Keaton was essential to "Annie Hall": he is the voice that best incarnates Burton's vision, so he serves as the front man for this particular project. Burton will aggressively insist that Gnarls Barkley is a two-man game, but that seems more magnanimous than accurate. On the surface, Cee-Lo looks like the vortex — he wrote the lyrics and sings the vocals on every song, including "Crazy," a single on the cusp of becoming the demographically limitless song of the moment (i.e., a 2006 version of OutKast's "Hey Ya!"). Yet even while "Crazy" is Cee-Lo's song, it's still Burton's design. It's the product of a singular vision, which is (more or less) the whole idea. The music of Gnarls Barkley is collaborative, but not in a creative sense; the goal of this collaboration is to reproduce the music that already exists inside Burton's skull.

"A song like 'Crazy' is a great example," Burton says. "I brought in a song that I felt was a complete Ennio Morricone ripoff" — he's referring to the definitive composer of countless spaghetti-western scores. "But Cee-Lo and I started talking, and I somehow got off on this tangent about how people won't take an artist seriously unless they're insane. And we were saying that if we really wanted this album to work, the best move would be to just kill ourselves. That's how audiences think; it's retarded. So we started jokingly discussing ways in which we could make people think we were crazy. We talked about this for hours, and then I went home. But while I was away, Cee-Lo took that conversation and made it into 'Crazy,' which we recorded in one take. That's the whole story. The lyrics are his interpretation of that conversation."

On the surface, such a methodology might make Danger Mouse sound like Phil Spector, the studio genius, egocentric taskmaster and accused murderer who supposedly threatened musicians with firearms when they did not perform songs to his liking. This would not be accurate. A better comparison might be Brian Eno, the British engineer-musician who used various bands and artists to generate the myriad musical concepts he imagined. There's at least one crucial difference, however: Though Eno was the intellectual force behind groups like Roxy Music and albums like "Heroes," he was never the star; the star was always someone else (like Bryan Ferry or David Bowie). What's atypical about Gnarls Barkley is that the star is Burton, even though he's barely visible onstage. Burton has the kind of paradoxical personality that's weirdly familiar among creative types: he's simultaneously confident and insecure, and he's a natural introvert who elected to become a public figure. More significant, he's a highly focused dude, and that focus is clear — Danger Mouse wants musical autonomy. He wants to be the first modern rock 'n' roll auteur, mostly because he understands a critical truth about the creative process: good art can come from the minds of many, but great art usually comes from the mind of one.

"I don't make a band's next album," he says. "I don't like making someone else's songs better. I'm not interested in that. This is where the Woody Allen thing comes back in. I have to be in control of the project I'm doing. I can create different kinds of musical worlds, but the artist needs the desire to go into that world. I won't fight with people to try and make the sounds I hear inside my head. What I want is for the leader of a group to come to me, and then I lead that person. Because even with some of my favorite bands, I only like 30 or 40 percent of what they do. I'd want to make that 30 percent into the whole album."

I ask if there is anyone he considers to be a model for this paradigm, or if there is any producer whose career he would like to emulate.

"Musically, there is no one who has the career I want," Burton says. "That's why I have to use film directors as a model. But I think there are other people who could do what I do, and maybe 'St. Elsewhere' will open things up. Like, Jack White was able to take control of Loretta Lynn, and the result was a great record" ("Van Lear Rose," which came out in 2004). "And that's cool. That's the goal."

The Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival is the hottest weekend in American popular music. This designation is literal: It takes place in the arid California desert, and it feels like watching MTV2 inside a blast furnace. Set on an expanse of polo fields 25 miles west of Palm Springs, Coachella annually features around 80 disparate musical acts and 60,000 highly disparate fans; I was told that one of the people in attendance at this year's event was Francis Ford Coppola, spotted wearing unmatched socks and sitting in the V.I.P. area with his daughter Sofia, checking out a Sunday-afternoon performance by Phoenix.

There were three acts at the 2006 Coachella that its 60,000 guests seemed to be talking about the most. The first was Madonna, arguably the most important female musician of the 20th century (curiously performing inside a tent, far away from the main stage). The second was the prog-metal band Tool, a reclusive, hypercredible volume machine performing live for the first time in four years. The third act was Gnarls Barkley. The combined record sales of Madonna and Tool exceed 200 million; during the weekend of Coachella, Gnarls Barkley had yet to release a record in America.

Gnarls would play Sunday afternoon; on Saturday, Burton and Cee-Lo conducted backstage interviews with a succession of random journalists (this was four days before I would talk with Burton privately in North Hollywood). Because it's an outdoor festival, the backstage area of Coachella is merely a collection of couches shaded by tents, hidden on three sides by trailers. There were no throngs of pretty girls, although there were several girls dressed as if they thought they were pretty; there was no backstage debauchery, unless you count random roadies eating hummus. When I first saw Burton and Cee-Lo, they were talking to a reporter from Rolling Stone. Burton was dressed plainly and wearing sunglasses. Cee-Lo was eating Lay's potato chips. Cee-Lo's head is bald, and his limbs are freakishly huge; his wristwatch looked as large as a wall clock. He is covered with tattoos. One is the familiar symbol of yin and yang. Another is the logo of the University of Georgia Bulldogs. Another is the word "BLOOD." When I sat down with Cee-Lo, I asked him if the BLOOD tattoo meant he was a gang member, and he said it did not. This denial, however, was not particularly convincing.

"I am not gang-affiliated," Cee-Lo said, "but I am gang-associated. I'm not the least bit active, but — coincidentally — a lot of my homies are Bloods. A lot of them."

Cee-Lo is a clever guy. He has also had a strangely diverse career. Before Gnarls Barkley, Cee-Lo was best known as a member of Goodie Mob, one of the first significant hip-hop acts to emerge from the South (he would eventually quit the group, citing his peers' unwillingness to expand musically). He was also a backup singer on TLC's No. 1 single "Waterfalls" and the writer and producer of "Don't Cha," a hit for the Pussycat Dolls (and a track currently used in a Heineken commercial, the beverage Cee-Lo — perhaps coincidentally — drank during our conversation). He has also appeared in an episode of the MTV reality program "My Super Sweet Sixteen" with his 15-year-old stepdaughter Sierra (it is important to note that Sierra is his stepdaughter, as Cee-Lo is only 31).

Cee-Lo classifies himself as a soul singer and a writer but not as a rapper ("Rap is just a cadence," he says). When he talks, Cee-Lo sounds like a preacher, which might be a product of his upbringing; both his parents were ministers, though his father died when he was 2 and his mother died when he was 18. It sounds as if Cee-Lo's youth was not tranquil.

"I was reckless," he said. "I was a bully. I was a violent guy, and I was a pyromaniac. I almost burned down our house once. We were moving into this house in College Park, Atlanta; we had just moved in, and the heat wasn't turned on yet. I was sprinkling gasoline on a fire to keep warm, and the fire jumped up through the nozzle. I panicked. I threw the whole gas can into the fire. It burned up a side of a wall."

After he told this anecdote, I mentioned that this did not sound like the actions of a teenage pyromaniac; it sounded more like an accident.

"Yeah, except that I liked it," Cee-Lo responded. "I liked the fire I was causing."

Before they ever met, Burton knew who Cee-Lo was. This was primarily because he liked Goodie Mob, but also because Burton's sister married a guy who had gone to Cee-Lo's high school ("My brother-in-law told me he was a thug," Burton recalls). They first interacted in the mid-90's, on a rainy night in Athens, Ga., back when Burton was still an unknown telecommunications student at the University of Georgia. Goodie Mob was playing a show with OutKast, and there was a local talent contest to see who would serve as the opening act. Burton enlisted a few friends and created an ad hoc group dubiously dubbed Rhyme & Reason. They placed second in the contest, but they still got to perform at the show. Afterward, Burton gave Cee-Lo a CD of music he had been working on, because he knew Cee-Lo's tastes went outside the normal parameters of rap.

"He knew I liked Portishead," Cee-Lo said. "That was our unspoken bond. When he told me he dug Portishead, that was all I needed to know."

Considering the consciously genre-defying construction of "St. Elsewhere," it might seem almost paradoxically predictable that the druggy, suicidal soundscapes of a white British trip-hop act served as the foundation for a musical relationship between two black guys in Georgia. "When I played my music for Cee-Lo," Burton says, "he moved his body in the way I imagined this music was supposed to make people react. So I thought, Maybe I've found the singer for these songs." The pair eventually began work on "St. Elsewhere" in the fall of 2003, starting with a demo called "Storm Coming," which would eventually be included on the final LP. Something happened between then and now, however, and that something probably needs to be explained before we go any further: In 2004, Danger Mouse released the most popular album in rock history that virtually no one paid for.

"Ah, 'The Grey Album,' " Burton says, sighing heavily. We are back in North Hollywood, where Danger Mouse is still consuming pizza. I had a suspicion that this was a subject Burton might find troubling, and I assumed he would not want to talk about it. I was half right. "'The Grey Album' is so misunderstood. I didn't even call it 'The Grey Album.' If you look at my original files for those songs, they're labeled 'The Black-White Album.' And the thing is, most people who have that record think the way it sounds is the way I wanted it to sound. And that's not the case at all."

Timing isn't everything, but it's close. Sometimes interesting things happen and nobody cares; sometimes interesting things happen and everybody cares. "The Grey Album" exists in that second category. In early 2004, Burton was working on albums with a couple of uncommercial indie rappers; he had already released three well-regarded (but widely ignored) electronic albums under the moniker Pelican City, and he'd earned some money making interstitial theme music for the Cartoon Network. He was unknown to the world at large, but mildly established within a specific, insular faction of the music industry. And that industry was being reinvented against its will. The concept of downloading music had suddenly become normative; because of Napster (and the lawsuits that had shut it down), most music fans understood what downloading was, even if they weren't doing it. That process raised new questions about who owned music and about what that ownership meant. Meanwhile, technology had accelerated, making it possible for anyone with a computer to manipulate existing music and copy it instantaneously. The entire sonic landscape teetered on the precipice of wholesale evolution.

It was at this point that Burton decided to straighten up his bedroom.

"One day I was cleaning my room and listening to the Beatles' White Album," he says. "I was kind of bored, because the other hip-hop work I was doing was really easy. Somebody had sent me an a capella version of 'The Black Album,' but I was already doing stuff with Cee-Lo and Jemini and Doom, so I didn't want to waste my beats on a remix record." "The Black Album" is a 2003 release by Jay-Z. Jemini and Doom are the two indie rappers whom Burton was collaborating with. The Beatles are the Beatles. "So I'm listening to the White Album and I'm putting 'The Black Album away, and I suddenly have this idea: I decide to see if I could take those two albums and make one song, just because of the names of the two albums and because they're perceived as being so different and because I've always loved Ringo Starr's drum sound."

Despite the avalanche of publicity that eventually surrounded "The Grey Album," the first part of Burton's explanation for its creation is consistently overlooked: This was mainly a linguistic coincidence. If everyone referred to the Beatles 1968 double album by its proper name ("The Beatles"), none of this would have ever happened.

"I sat down and tried to make one track, and it happened really fast," Burton recalls. "Then I tried to make a second song, and it took a lot longer, but it still worked. And I thought, Wow. What if I can do the whole album? It was almost this Andy Warhol moment, where I made a decision to do something artistically without a clear reason as to why, except to show people what I could do. And I could never do an album like that again. I still don't know where I found the patience to make those songs. It took me about 20 days in a row, and those were all 12- and 13-hour days. And the whole time I was doing it, I was terrified someone else would come up with the same idea, which would have ruined everything. Because really, the idea is pretty simple."

If you aren't among the countless masses who downloaded "The Grey Album," here's what it sounds like: Imagine every musical element of the White Album chopped into separate parts (every individual drum fill, the bridge from "Helter Skelter," the intro to "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" and so on). Burton then reconstituted those dissected parts into loops and patterns and samples, which were then placed underneath Jay-Z's rapping (Jay-Z had released the a capella version of "The Black Album" officially, so the acquisition of the words was easy). Some of those combinations melded remarkably well, and it all seemed like such a clever idea, and it was the perfect moment for something like that to happen. And people just went nuts for it. Entertainment Weekly named it album of the year, and the record label EMI sent Burton a cease-and-desist letter for unlawful use of the Beatles catalog. Burton now assumes the album has gone multiplatinum, although of course he has no way of knowing for sure. And it was all because some shadowy, enigmatic figure called DJ Danger Mouse burned 3,000 CD's to impress a handful of people nobody had ever heard of.

"I thought it would be a weird, cultic record for techies to appreciate, because they would be the only people who would understand how much work was involved," he says. "But then it was taken into this whole different world, where a million people were downloading it at the same time. At best, that record is just quirky and odd and really illegal. I never imagined people would play those songs in clubs. I also think the people who love it tend to love it for the wrong reasons, and the people who hate it tend to hate it for the wrong reasons. I think some people love it for what it supposedly did to the music industry, which was not my intent. I did not make 'The Grey Album' for music fans. I made it to impress people who were really into sampling."

To unsuspecting consumers, "The Grey Album" seemed like the union of two cultures that were not only different but ideologically opposed; it made people realize musical connections they never knew existed. That is more or less the story of Burton's life. His childhood was spent in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood in Spring Valley, N.Y., where his was one of only two black families. "My parents didn't tell me anything about why I was different," he insists. "I think that was good. I had no idea why I looked the way I looked, so I had to use my imagination." These were the 1980's, so Burton listened to Poison. When he became a teenager, his parents moved to Georgia; everyone there was black. He listened to RZA. By the time he got to college, he had become deeply obsessed with hip-hop; for a long while, it was the only musical genre he consumed. But then he decided to have a beer in public, and everything changed.

"I remember hearing Pink Floyd's 'Wish You Were Here' in a bar," Burton says. "This was around 1995. And I remember thinking it was so beautiful. It just put me in a daze. I asked someone what it was, and they were like: 'You don't know? This is Pink Floyd.' Now, I had heard of Pink Floyd, but I never really knew what they sounded like. I had never actually played Pink Floyd records. And I suddenly found myself wondering, Why have I spent all these years never listening to this music? And the reason was that I was afraid to do anything that would have seemed socially unacceptable. I was afraid that people wouldn't think of me as this hip-hop guy, because hip-hop was my Thing. So then I went out and bought every Pink Floyd record."

When Gnarls Barkley finally takes the Coachella stage at 6:42 p.m. on Sunday, the band opens with the intro to "Breathe," from Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." This is not because Burton had a beer in 1995; this is because all 14 group members are dressed like characters from "The Wizard of Oz," a movie that collegiate stoners and so-called "synchronicity buffs" like to play simultaneously with "Dark Side of the Moon" (you hit "play" on the CD player when the MGM lion roars for the third time, just before the opening credits). The stage is populated with numerous flying monkeys, two Dorothys (one black, one white), two Scarecrows, a bunch of witches and a laptop computer. Burton portrays the Tin Man and hides at the rear of the stage. Cee-Lo is out front as the Cowardly Lion, sporadically asking the crowd if they have ever "seen freedom" and if they "want to rock."

Cee-Lo's voice is several octaves higher than his physical appearance would indicate, so it soars above the unconventional tempos of the music; one of Burton's pet interests is presenting melodies at unorthodox, inconsistent speeds. All the songs are short, often under three minutes. Considering that this show was still nine days before the U.S. release of "St. Elsewhere," it was surprising to see how much of the audience was already familiar with the material, but perhaps that should be expected; the songs had been in the electronic ether for weeks. "Crazy" went to No. 1 in the U.K. solely on the strength of download sales.

None of the 12 musicians added to the Gnarls Barkley touring lineup played on "St. Elsewhere," but they're generally polished veterans; most have more professional experience than Burton. The drummer (Chris Vrenna) was in Nine Inch Nails. The bassist (Justin Meldal-Johnsen) plays with Beck. One of the backup singers (Res) has her own record deal with Universal. When the "St. Elsewhere" songs are performed live, they sound a bit like funk songs; when I later mentioned that to Burton, he got a little bummed out. ("Yeah, I know," he said, mildly annoyed. "We kept saying: 'Too funky. This is too funky.' It's a problem.") During the early days of the "St. Elsewhere" sessions, Cee-Lo and Burton had no intention of touring at all, or at least no notion of how such a tour would operate. The only goal was to make a certain kind of album.

"What I was originally trying to do was make a psychedelic record that sounded liked psychedelic records from the late 1960's and early 70's," Burton said. "Basically, anyone who was copying the Beatles. I suppose bands like the 13th Floor Elevators and the Electric Prunes are the ones people have heard of, but that was really nameless music; there were thousands of those groups. And what I liked about those bands was that the musicians made crazy decisions. They would play a normal melody for 30 seconds and then throw in something completely uncommercial and insane. Why did they do that? It blew my mind. I wanted to make experimental music that still had melody."

The degree to which "St. Elsewhere" succeeds as psychedelia is open to debate; at first exposure, it doesn't seem especially trippy or mind-altering. Burton claims there is a "steep learning curve" to the album, because the unorthodox tempos and cinematic elements can be lost on casual listeners. This certainly does not seem to be the case with "Crazy." The learning curve on that ultra-accessible single was ridiculously low, which is probably why it worked. "To have a record go to No. 1, you have to appeal to people who have no idea who you are or what you do," Burton says. "That's just the way it is. "

There are several espoused mysteries surrounding Gnarls Barkley, some of which the duo seem to perpetuate on purpose. They usually refuse to explain why they named the band "Gnarls Barkley," prompting many writers to assume they must love the former N.B.A. power forward Charles Barkley. This is not the case. Burton was in a cafe with several friends in Silver Lake, Calif., and everyone at the table started making up fictional celebrity names like "Prince Gnarls" and "Bob Gnarley." When someone came up with "Gnarls Barkley," Burton wrote it down. That's the whole story. The pair also decline to be photographed unless they are both dressed as movie characters, which leads people to suspect that the outfits have some sort of symbolic relationship to the music; as it turns out, this is just something they like to do. Perhaps the strangest thing about their friendship is that Cee-Lo actually refers to Burton as Danger Mouse in casual conversation. As far as I can tell, he is the only person who does this.

"I very rarely call him Brian," Cee-Lo says. "I love the name Danger Mouse. It's an oxymoron, you know. But he is dangerous. He is."

When I spoke to Burton at Power Plant, he was in the process of leading band rehearsals for a Gnarls Barkley tour, although — at the time — no tour schedule had been set. The future of the band is still being invented, as there is still some uncertainty about how popular "St. Elsewhere" will be in America (it opened on the domestic Billboard charts last month at No. 20, rising to No. 15 the following week). Nonetheless, Burton says there will definitely be another Gnarls album in the future.

At the same time, he already has plans to release albums with Black Thought from the Roots, Mark Linkous of Sparklehorse and Blur's frontman Damon Albarn (Burton was recently a producer of the album "Demon Days" for Albarn's side project, Gorillaz). When he describes those projects anecdotally, they sound like ordinary collaborations; Burton sounds less like a movie director and more like a regular producer: a guy who simply records someone else's musical ideas. What will be more compelling is when (and if) Burton can ultimately employ his auteur philosophy in rock production.

"Let's use Spike Lee as an example," Burton says, falling back to film analogies. "Let's say Spike Lee makes a movie with Jamie Foxx and Robert De Niro. Because of their three different reputations, you will have totally different demographics coming together for totally different reasons. But the film will still be taken seriously. In music, you don't have that. If you put Jay-Z on a record with Radiohead, it's a gimmick, because there's no central person you can depend upon to contextualize the ultimate product. But you can easily put two different actors in the same movie and still have it make sense — if the right director does it."

It will be interesting to see if anything akin to a "Danger Mouse Sound" eventually emerges. Traditionally, rock producers are defined by their ability to inject specific, recognizable qualities into the records they superstruct. For Spector, it was the dense, layered "wall of sound." Steve Albini (best known for his work with the Pixies and Nirvana) consistently captures raw, jagged guitar riffs with vocals that are low in the mix; Robert (Mutt) Lange (Def Leppard, Shania Twain) specializes in polished, sculptured anthems that sound the way the 1980's felt. At this point, it would be impossible to categorize what a record by Danger Mouse could be expected to sound like (while "St. Elsewhere" sounds older than it is, his contributions to Gorillaz's "Demon Days" made that album sound vaguely futuristic). He doesn't have a clear sonic signature. That might be because it's still too early in his career (Burton is only 28). It might also be because his aspirations don't necessitate a signature; if he's able to find artists who actively want to be directed — rather than just produced — then every Danger Mouse production will be a creation unto itself.

Chuck Klosterman is a contributing writer for the magazine and the author, most recently, of "Killing Yourself to Live: 85 Percent of a True Story."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 01:46 (nineteen years ago)

North Hollywood sounds like a place that could be glamorous or, at the very least, mildly attractive. It is not. Or at least it's not on Hinds Avenue, where dirty one-story buildings look semideserted and many of the local "beautiful people" appear to have jobs that involve (a) ripping apart used cars and (b) selling those individual parts to less-beautiful people whose cars are even more used. Nobody on this North Hollywood avenue looks famous, and a few of them look terrifying. But it just so happens that 7325 Hinds Avenue is the geographic location of Power Plant Studios

A recording studio in a bad neighborhood! How unlikely, yet grittily appealing!

and inside those nondescript walls a human named Danger Mouse is talking about an album that has just sold 91,000 copies in England within the span of seven days. Danger Mouse doesn't look famous, either; he also doesn't look dangerous, or even rodentesque

GROAN

And what I realized is that they worked because Woody Allen was an auteur: he did his Thing, and that particular Thing was completely his own. That's what I decided to do with music. I want to create a director's role within music, which is what I tried to do on this album."

It's called a producer, you dumb fuck. And Klosterman is even more of a dumb fuck for buying into it. Chuck, please, quit your job. Danger Mouse, stick to making music and don't talk to anyone about anything.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)

Yet even while "Crazy" is Cee-Lo's song, it's still Burton's design. It's the product of a singular vision, which is (more or less) the whole idea. The music of Gnarls Barkley is collaborative, but not in a creative sense; the goal of this collaboration is to reproduce the music that already exists inside Burton's skull.

From Pitchfork:

DM: I work with rappers a lot, but that wasn't the way I looked at it. I remember we were in the studio and he said something about rap. I wasn't going to ask him, "Are you going to rap?" or "Come on please rap," but I remember him saying something like, "I wouldn't even know how to rap these days, what am I supposed to do, "De de de dede?" Where would you even start-- none of the tracks I gave him lent themselves [to that]. I couldn't picture him doing it anyway. He said he was going to react to them however they made him react-- and most of that was singing.

max (maxreax), Monday, 19 June 2006 01:58 (nineteen years ago)

next week: klosterman visits the glamorous-sounding brooklyn enclave "east new york"! and guess what!

dear chuck klosterman: please break up.

lavendra diamondheart (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:01 (nineteen years ago)

The musical object in question, "St. Elsewhere," by Gnarls Barkley, is an unlikely fusion of alternative pop, psychedelic R&B and postmodern hip-hop, and it was constructed differently from the vast majority of mainstream rock 'n' roll albums. And if "St. Elsewhere" does well over the long haul, its success will be a direct result of the way it was made, a blueprint that contradicts the conventional way in which rock bands are supposed to create music.

I get flustered even TRYING to unpack everything that's wrong with these two sentences!

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:01 (nineteen years ago)

He wants to be the first modern rock 'n' roll auteur, mostly because he understands a critical truth about the creative process: good art can come from the minds of many, but great art usually comes from the mind of one.

Gah! GAH!

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

Its rather poorly written on the whole, isn't it.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)

Hoo boy.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:07 (nineteen years ago)

Klosterman just wrote a dumbass article on videogames too, if anyone cares:
http://www.esquire.com/features/articles/2006/060610_mfe_July_06_Klosterman.html

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

Thirty years ago, a rock critic was out hunting on the frozen wastes when he slipped and fell into a crevasse. In 2006, he was discovered by some scientists and thawed out...

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

"Your beats and rhymes confuse me! I'm just a simple rock critic!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:10 (nineteen years ago)

I could go on about this article but I won't.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm sorry your honor, I was mezmerized by the sounds coming out of this strange disc-shaped rock band machine!"

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:13 (nineteen years ago)

Cee-Lo's voice is several octaves higher than his physical appearance would indicate

Mike Tyson must blow Chuck's mind.

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

but guys, if the white album had been named 'the beatles', the grey album wouldn't exist in its current form! i think this is a key and insightful point which provides a fascinating glimpse into the quirky mind of supergenius "DJ auteur" Dangermouse.

Sym Sym (sym), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:24 (nineteen years ago)

"several octaves"

lavendra diamondheart (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:24 (nineteen years ago)

"Cee-Lo's penis is several yards smaller than his physical appearance would indicate"

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

"I could go on about this article but I won't."

ditto. i'm newyorktimed out.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

This does boggle my mind though:


"To unsuspecting consumers, "The Grey Album" seemed like the union of two cultures that were not only different but ideologically opposed; it made people realize musical connections they never knew existed."

rock samples and rapping. who would have believed that such a thing could work.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

b-b-but CULTUREJAMMING do you see

lavendra diamondheart (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

Paul's Boutique? Never heard of it.

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

Run D.M. who?

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

grandmaster flashermouse

lavendra diamondheart (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

Hip-Hop DJ uses unlikely samples!

http://www.rootz.net/abamb001.jpg

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

I heard about this innovative rap record where these guys rap over Chic for like 15 minutes!

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:41 (nineteen years ago)

Danger Mouse is not only far from being the first "DJ Auteur," -- he's not even a particularly good candidate for the title. He's had exactly two projects that have garnered public attention, one being a mash-up album and the other being a collaboration. Danger Mouse has exactly zero albums so far that seem to fit this "auteur" idea.

I'm also gobsmacked that Klosterman bothers to think of Phil Spector and Brian Eno but insists that they're not really "auteurs."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:42 (nineteen years ago)

The musical object in question, "St. Elsewhere," by Gnarls Barkley, is an unlikely fusion of alternative pop, psychedelic R&B and postmodern hip-hop, and it was constructed differently from the vast majority of mainstream rock 'n' roll albums. And if "St. Elsewhere" does well over the long haul, its success will be a direct result of the way it was made, a blueprint that contradicts the conventional way in which rock bands are supposed to create music.

Non-rock 'n' roll album constructed differently than majority of rock 'n' roll albums! And succeeds as a result!?

Q('.'Q) (eman), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:58 (nineteen years ago)

When I sat down with Cee-Lo, I asked him if the BLOOD tattoo meant he was a gang member, and he said it did not. This denial, however, was not particularly convincing.

Have any of you people seen how Cee-lo dresses and talks? He's like a big hippie teddy bear. On his MTV cribs he wore an all green moo moo and talked about his love of Coldplay. I can't remember if he had a lisp or not. I can't even fathom how racist you'd have to be to meet that guy and wonder if he was a gang member or not.

There were three acts at the 2006 Coachella that its 60,000 guests seemed to be talking about the most. The first was Madonna, arguably the most important female musician of the 20th century (curiously performing inside a tent, far away from the main stage). The second was the prog-metal band Tool, a reclusive, hypercredible volume machine performing live for the first time in four years. The third act was Gnarls Barkley. The combined record sales of Madonna and Tool exceed 200 million; during the weekend of Coachella, Gnarls Barkley had yet to release a record in America.

Did he call Tool "hypercredible"? Also, how surprising is it that the three people who were discussed were two old acts and one new act? Is that really earth shattering information?

Period period period (Period period period), Monday, 19 June 2006 02:58 (nineteen years ago)

Though Eno was the intellectual force behind groups like Roxy Music and albums like "Heroes," he was never the star; the star was always someone else (like Bryan Ferry or David Bowie).

Shh! Nobody mention that Eno has had dozens of solo albums spanning three decades that have garnered a huge audience! Shh!

Period period period (Period period period), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:01 (nineteen years ago)

That studio is about three blocks from Gamedude (The world's largest video game store!)...The "rough" characters Klosterman was seeing were probably a nasty combo of bums and gaming nerds.

I don't know why everyone absolutely hates Klosterman on ILM; I usually find him amusing even when he's doesn't have a clue about what he's talking about (i.e. "postmodern hip-hop").

Cunga (Cunga), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:06 (nineteen years ago)

I knew I could rely on you guys to pick apart the NY Times Danger Mouse article! Thanks guys for your critical insights. Now I can sleep well knowing pop music bloggers are protecting my right to musical accuracy!

Pathetic.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)

Go write about the travesty in your blogs!

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:25 (nineteen years ago)

So out of curiosity, does that mean you think it's a good article?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:27 (nineteen years ago)

I think it's servicable for the people he's writing for, who are obviously not music critics. I don't think it's a travesty or anything. The magazine features tons of useful articles, and so slagging it for the occasional music article for non-fans is a bit low. What is shocking to me is the ire and derision this guy inspires in ILM.

Is is his overstatementsa and generalizations (common in articles for non-fans), or is it just sour grapes? I'm thinking sour grapes.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:31 (nineteen years ago)

i don't hate chuck klosterman. i read his column every month in esquire. or is it gq? one of those. on the other hand:

dear blogosphere, try never to write a sentence like this:

"There were no throngs of pretty girls, although there were several girls dressed as if they thought they were pretty;"


oof! okay, now i'm gonna get some sleep.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not a music writer (or a blogger). I'm a NYTimes subscriber who happens to like music. Writing for the uninitiated should not mean making untrue claims about an artist being the first person to do something that he doesn't even do, not to mention making the unsupported claim that a collaborator has little significance in a project and that said collaborator is probably a member of a gang in spite of his claims to the contrary.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)

Scott once described him as 'growing a brain in public.' I liked that. I enjoyed 'coco puffs,' it was entertaining.

This just has lots of poorly written sentences.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not a music writer (or a blogger) either. Dude is saying some shit that even the layman can tell is bunk, and is being called on it.

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

The blogs are already 95% shit, so I think it's too late for instruction by example.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

The article dumbs things down for a lay audience. So what?

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

Dumbing down != Making shit up

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:44 (nineteen years ago)

The idea of intellectual rigor in pop music criticism is a ridiculous concept, since rock criticism (almost as a rule) is entirely junk. In a form where hype and exaggeration are staples, music fans calling this guy on his inaccuracies is like Time Warner calling Universal "money grubbing."

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)

And I'm not saying all music writers lack talent. It's content and substance that is lacking in criticism, not style.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:46 (nineteen years ago)

The blogs are already 95% shit, so I think it's too late for instruction by example.

"So you have a metalhead friend who hates hip hop with a passion, or maybe a punk who thinks rap exploits women and will therefore have nothing to do it, or perhaps an internet critic who simply won't shut up about NoMeansNo. Well, I suggest a healthy dose of the ultimate party rap consort, The Pharcyde. They'll either love it and be instantly transformed into hip hop gurus, or more than likely, bash your head open with a brick. The first album by the lovably obnoxious Califorinia rappers, is a wonderfully adventurous exploration that covers almost every social topic known to man in the best way possible - with a brilliant mixture of low and high comedy and introspective contemplation. The four rappers that form The Pharcyde are all very humorous, thoughtful, surprsingly lucid and self-depreciating, and most importantly, they can actually rap. None of the marble-in-the-mouth stylings of Mas or Puff Daddy here.

"The music on the album is very lush and multi-layered, with a mixture of live instruments, turntable wankery, and samples from jazz, R&B, funk, classic rock and everything in between. Powerful beats pervade, with some of the most kinetic bass lines this side of funkadelic. The Pharcyde forgoes the minimalism that now dominates mainstream rap music, favoring intense rhythmic layering and a strong melodic element instead. Piano lines cascade down dropping bass lines while three or four vocal tracks attack from all sides. The music is jaunty, elaborate and even atmospheric in parts (consider the stoner rap anthem "Pack the Pipe"), all of it drawn tightly together with the band's satirical lyrical outllook. Failed relationships, political violence, timeless nostalgia, intense bitterness, hemp activism, urban renewal, racism and intense longing are all explored with precision. And yet, the album is always entertaining, always inviting, ideal for both parties and intensely personal listening.

"Bizarre Ride II The Pharcyde and the Pharcyde albums that followed, well illustrate the promise and potential of hip hop music with greater aspirations, promise and potential still largely unexplored. Intensely lyrical, surprisingly melodic, and a good deal more involved than most hip hop groups, The Pharcyde are among the elite of the genre."

Review by James Slone

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:47 (nineteen years ago)

Dude, grind your axe somewhere else. You're just babbling about general shit that doesn't even have anything to do with this article.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:47 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I guess ILM is just the headquarters for grinding axes over NY Times articles.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:49 (nineteen years ago)

I also wrote that review before the blogs took over, you know when I was like 22 or 23. I'm now 29. So fucking what?

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:50 (nineteen years ago)

You're right, no one should ever be critical of or expect anything from music writing.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:51 (nineteen years ago)

Are you going to laugh at me because of something I wrote when I was an undergrad? Because you'll find plenty more dirt if you look for it.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:51 (nineteen years ago)

Hey man, mock away.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)

That review was also written for what was then a punk/metal review site.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)

We are annoyed by this article. You seem even more annoyed that we are annoyed. What's the point, exactly?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:53 (nineteen years ago)

I just think it's exaggerated, that's all, overblown.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

You know, given the time I wrote it and the context of that Pharcyde review, I'd have to say I stand by it.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 03:55 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry for thinking a music writer ought to know the correct definitions of words like "octave" and "tempo."

Goodnight.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:03 (nineteen years ago)

Hurting wins.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

it seems like the fact that this would pass as music writing/criticism for a major publ. is the problem, not that clusterman is just a stupid writer. it does say something about what art criticism is/has become. alot of music/art criticism feels like laywers making their case for some big idea or theme outside of the artist instead of just talking about what the person is doing/finding several themes and uniquenesses that are actually true to the work. i read an article in The New Yorker about a painter and it had this exact feel - except the writer was decent he was making his "case" fairly well etc. and the artist didn't sound as coached and awkward, didn't really change my opinion about its usefullness tho. you can't really write about art with an agenda in mind/with sensationalism in mind or you're fucked.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:11 (nineteen years ago)

Was I hurt? Am I supposed to be defeated or something, because I wrote a music review nearly 7 years ago? Or is this an "octave, tempo" thing in the NY Times article? I'm confused.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:13 (nineteen years ago)

Yes you are.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:14 (nineteen years ago)

Ok, you arrogant, pompous douche.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:15 (nineteen years ago)

I see this is part of your instruction by example.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:16 (nineteen years ago)

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

I tend to find Klosterman pretty readable, but this is pretty lamentable. The "pretty girls" line is a jaw dropper, but that whole section...

"He was also a backup singer on TLC's No. 1 single "Waterfalls" and the writer and producer of "Don't Cha," a hit for the Pussycat Dolls (and a track currently used in a Heineken commercial, the beverage Cee-Lo — perhaps coincidentally — drank during our conversation)."

Oddball ineptitude aside, the main thing I learn from this piece (and I've had this shot in the dark confirmed by someone who's spent some time interviewing him) is that as good a singer/rapper as Cee-lo is, he's not someone you necessarily want to have a conversation with.

"He knew I liked Portishead," Cee-Lo said. "That was our unspoken bond. When he told me he dug Portishead, that was all I needed to know."

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:18 (nineteen years ago)

I wrote music reviews when I was younger and stopped writing because I simply lost interest. If I'm supposed to be embarrassed by what I wrote years ago, fine, I accept my disgrace. I still write, and much better than I did then.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:21 (nineteen years ago)

ILM -the sandbox for men (mostly).
Klosterman. i could not have spelled his name more wrong.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:23 (nineteen years ago)

ILM -the sandbox for men (mostly).

Hooray!

I think, James, the real problem here is that you're defending a (to borrow Forks's perfect description here) 'lamentable' article by saying that because it is aimed at 'non-fans' that therefore its errors are excusable. Which is kinda strange, shall we say.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)

James, forget the Pharcyde thing. I'm sorry I posted it. It was a cheap shot. The main thing is I just don't get why you find exaggeration, racism, and blatant inaccuracy defensible in the Sunday magazine of what's supposed to be the best U.S. newspaper, and why it bothers you so much that other people feel differently.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

not that clusterman is just a stupid writer
______
i could not have spelled his name more wrong.

No, that was good. Chuck Klusterfuck!

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not defending the article so much at musing over the reaction here. To me, the article was a harmless fluff piece. But it's your right to criticize the piece.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

I concede that the article is weak and open to criticism.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

Quite beyond the actual writerly gaffes in this article, it's quite amazingly wrongheaded in its entire contention: how can Dangermouse possibly be an auteur when his beats are so boring and indistinguishable? He is aurally invisible on "Crazy" - it's hard to imagine anyone saying "man I could take or leave Cee-Lo on this but the groove is really something else!"

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:32 (nineteen years ago)

It's okay Abbadavid. It didn't offend me. It's an old review that reflects my writing when I wrote it.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:32 (nineteen years ago)

http://members.tripod.com/ScumQueen/dohboy/huggles.jpg

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:34 (nineteen years ago)

the main thing I learn from this piece (and I've had this shot in the dark confirmed by someone who's spent some time interviewing him) is that as good a singer/rapper as Cee-lo is, he's not someone you necessarily want to have a conversation with.

The piece also brought me to the exact same conclusion about Danger Mouse.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:35 (nineteen years ago)

In order to enter into the spirit of the thread, one thing in the article that really rubbed me the wrong way was Danger Mouse acting as though he required primacy over a group during production to make it his own thing. Usually, when artists want to be "auteurs," they just form projects around their creative ideas, which happens all the time. It's like he wants points for doing what every other solo artist or project already does.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:45 (nineteen years ago)

it probably just felt good to say. just like the words woody allen. he's just became part of the machine temporarily and i don't hold him responsible.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:54 (nineteen years ago)

I've interviewed both and a wonderful time was had by all. Cee-Lo is so full of knowedge and insight that it makes me feel like a 12-year-old.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 04:56 (nineteen years ago)

so is he in a gang?

Sym Sym (sym), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:02 (nineteen years ago)

I agree with Slone on some of this. Klosterman seems very harmless to me. What I could see being offputting to some is the way he always places himself in the middle of the hipster cognoscenti with all this authority but so what? What I think is sort of funny about his writing is that I feel he can be capable of pulling off an incredibly astute observation about anything he talks about while still potentially missing his main point completely. His writing goes "Nonsense, nonsense, pretentious nonsense, doesn't know what he's talking about, incredibly OTM comment regarding some minor thing, more nonsense, etc"

Cunga (Cunga), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:04 (nineteen years ago)

I love how everything Klosterman does is based on the bait-and-switch!


North Hollywood sounds like a place that could be glamorous or, at the very least, mildly attractive.

WITH A NAME LIKE NORTH HOLLYWOOD IT MUST BE GLAMOUROUS!

it is not.

OH

On the surface, Cee-Lo looks like the vortex

I CAN SEE THAT!!!!!

Argh! (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:15 (nineteen years ago)

On the surface, Cee-Lo looks like the vortex

I CAN SEE THAT!!!!!

Argh! (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:16 (nineteen years ago)

it's still Burton's design.

HM. OK.

On the surface, such a methodology might make Danger Mouse sound like Phil Spector,

I WAS JUST THINKING SPECTOPR, THANK YOU CHUCK!!

A better comparison might be Brian Eno

OH... YOU DON'T SAY

Because it's an outdoor festival, the backstage area of Coachella is merely a collection of couches shaded by tents, hidden on three sides by trailers.

THERE MUST BE PUSSY AND DRUGS!!!

There were no throngs of pretty girls... there was no backstage debauchery

MY PRECONCEPTIONS OF INDIE-CENTRIC CONCERT GOING HAS BEEN SHATTERED!!

Argh! (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:17 (nineteen years ago)

The main use of the bait and switch was being endlessly shocked and amazed that a black person would like music (and movies!) made by white people.

Sym Sym (sym), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:32 (nineteen years ago)

OMG HE LIKES PINK FLOYD/MORRICONE/THE BEATLES/PORTISHEAD/WOODY ALLEN OMG

Sym Sym (sym), Monday, 19 June 2006 05:34 (nineteen years ago)

This isn't a diss nor a compliment, but reading Klosterman, I can only think of the narrator voice in The Wonder Years.

aDOring NUTbians (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 06:35 (nineteen years ago)

That said, I didn't find the article awful.

It just sounds like a "Gnarls Barklay For Dummies" article, which is probably its exact intent.. and Klosterman, with some rather odd naive personal affects occasionally thrown in, accomplished that.

Far worse articles have been overlooked by ILMers. (which isn't saying much, but anyway...)

aDOring NUTbians (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 06:39 (nineteen years ago)

The Klosterman hate is so wierd on ILM. It's like seeing a bunch of Dan Rathers wigging out over some discrepancies in a Andy Rooney piece.

darin (darin), Monday, 19 June 2006 07:04 (nineteen years ago)

I'm usually one of the first people to defend these types of articles via a "he's just dumbing it down for a general NYT audience, what's the big deal?" argument. But there's a difference between dumbing it down and not getting the simplest facts straight. Besides the "tempo"/"octaves" mis-definitions that Hurting et al have highlighted, most of the article tries to convince us that we need to check out DM because the notion of "producer as svengali" is something new and exciting. HELLO!!!! -- Phil Spector and Brian Eno are mentioned several times IN THIS VERY ARTICLE.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 19 June 2006 07:39 (nineteen years ago)

I am in many ways the NYT magazine target demograhic. I am white, 45-59, college-educated professional--and a NYT subscriber. I am unlike (I think) their target demographic in that I dl'd the Grey Album, I own a Goody Mob cd, and I know what mashups are.

Now, I'm not a critic and surely not much of a blogger. Just John Q. Public, but one who does not suffer fools gladly. I thought the article sucked for the following reasons:

I thought the writer was trying too hard to make a phenomenon of DM. I like the Grey Album (here's a Klostermanism curiously absent from the article: "If you rearrange the letters in Beatles and Black Album, you get A Blamable Beck Lust") but c'mon, the superlatives and gushiness just aren't warranted. Kudos to Klosterman for pitching and getting the article in the magazine, but even with my rudimentary knowledge of music and musicians I gagged at a voice "several octaves above" and the whole Cee-Lo as Blood. I mean, if he was even an honorary Blood his membershi is now revoked for dressing as Inspector Cluseau.

The entire breathless contention that this is the first time rap & rock have come together boggled my mind. I thought it became a commonlace about the time that Bernie "All the Woo in the World" Worrell was a member of the Talking Heads/Tom-Tom Club. Or when Rapture hit number 1 on the pop charts. When was that, 1980/81?

The whole thing about wanting to be an auteur, what others might call a pproducer, I can't blame DM for...he's got his story and he's gonna sell it. But Klosterman came off as a writer more suited for TeenBeat rather than the Grey Lady in his gushy blather.

J Arthur Rank (Quin Tillian), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:38 (nineteen years ago)

I summarise..

"There is something going on here, but they know knot what it is.."

I like that typo. Keeping it.

Something happened. So let's explain what we see.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:43 (nineteen years ago)

"Though Eno was the intellectual force behind groups like Roxy Music"

I usually don't mind getting-your-facts-rightism so much, but people, I'm sick of reading this kind of thing about Roxy/Eno. Bryan Ferry WAS the intellectual force behind Roxy Music.

Diego Valladolid (dvalladt), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

this is the point in the discussion where some Capt-Save-A-Cyber-Hack usually posts something along the line of "I know Chuck Klosterman/have worked with him/edited him/etc and not only is he a real sweetheart he's a great writer and you guys are all jealous nahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah"

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not sure how 'racist' it is to suspect a guy tattooed with gang names and symbols might be in a gang.

But I agree it's a crappy article.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

My uncle has a tattoo of an anchor, he must be Popeye!

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

might!=must

ffs

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

I just get bummed when these threads turn personal and pre-emptive. maybe I'm naive but you can hate on somebody's writing, or in the case of an autobio/memoirist type like CK hate on his writing persona, without dissing the actual person behind it.

carry on

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:50 (nineteen years ago)

of course the autobiographical element confuses things...

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:51 (nineteen years ago)

This is why I only truly criticize myself, since I know the subject so intimately. (I lash out at others because of society, which made me the bitter shell of a man I am today.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

i just wonder sometimes if people forget where they are when they complain about people complaining about music writing on ilm. or forget what kind of freaks they are dealing with.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 19 June 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

I just get bummed when these threads turn personal and pre-emptive. maybe I'm naive but you can hate on somebody's writing, or in the case of an autobio/memoirist type like CK hate on his writing persona, without dissing the actual person behind it.

OTM. I'm gonna be Capt.-Save-A-Cyber-Duder for a sec and add that just because there's a coupla blunders in the piece doesn't mean Chuck doesn't have a great track record, because he's usually pretty fucking on and pretty fucking astute.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

Is is his overstatementsa and generalizations (common in articles for non-fans), or is it just sour grapes?

I don't mind overstatements or generalizations but I'm definitely disappointed when the article writer puts his own (uncalled for) spin on things. As in, "But in a larger sense, Gnarls Barkley is really just one person, and that person is Burton." Or portraying Cee-Lo as a colorful character and attention-grabbing talent instead of an equal collaborator. I mean, he might have a tattoo that says "bloods," but he's also done stuff for Cartoon Network just like DM. And had two solo albums where he worked with a lot of big name producers in addition to doing his own production.

Klosterman's good at writing that stuff off because Cee-Lo didn't produce *rock* music or work in the sort of rock/pop/hip-hop hybrid that's accepted. You just get the vague sense that he was involved with some rap work that gets trivialized in the face of this svengali producer. What's with all of the references to producers being rock dudes?

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

The only thing that really bothered me was that the first mention of Cee-Lo was pointing out that he was eating potato chips. That was necessary.

Also...[Cee-Lo] was also a backup singer on TLC's No. 1 single "Waterfalls"

How did I not know this?

mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

To be fair, Klosterman might actually know the definition of "octave" and just not know the definition of "several."

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)

reading it, in no way was I convinced at all that its not a 50/50 collabo. he did not back it up. I might agree, but i've only heard the single.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

I know we're focused on the NY Times Magazine article, but that Esquire column is terrible and wrong. A number of people are writing serious crit about games. There's no dominant critic, so he's right insofar as his headline is correct, but not for any of the reasons he talks about.

save the robot (save the robot), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

Ain't that bad. People seem very angry over this....

Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

My uncle has a tattoo of an anchor, he must be Popeye!
-- Whiney G. Weingarten (christophe...), June 19th, 2006.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

might!=must
ffs

-- 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (austin.swinbur...), June 19th, 2006.

his uncle might be popeye!

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

I think the generalizations and dubious claims can be attributed to Klosterman trying to force his article to fit with his own thesis (or angle) about Danger Mouse as auteur. It seems like he enjoyed that idea so much, he was willing to bend a few facts and make a few assumptions.

Binjominia (Brilhante), Monday, 19 June 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

This isn't a diss nor a compliment, but reading Klosterman, I can only think of the narrator voice in The Wonder Years.

haha

Fact: When I was a freshman in high school, I posted on the same metal/prog rock board as James Slone!

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 June 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

Damn, this shit is just so lazy. You're in the NYT, Chuck - do five minutes' research or get the fuck out the way.

Jason Toon (Jason Toon), Monday, 19 June 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

binjominia otm.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

He is aurally invisible on "Crazy" - it's hard to imagine anyone saying "man I could take or leave Cee-Lo on this but the groove is really something else!"

-- Tim Finney (tfinne...), June 19th, 2006.

Yeah, as someone who's been in love with Cee-Lo's voice since I ever first heard Goodie Mob (whom I still think were one of the best bands of the 90s and better than Outkast until S/LB), this is my biggest beef with the article. I was drawn to the GB album because of Cee-Lo's voice and tunes and I still think those are the most defining and identifiable aspects of the album. It very much sounds to me like the production is background, in service of the singer. In fact, I think this is more true of the GB album than it is of most hip-hop albums I know.

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

I know we're focused on the NY Times Magazine article, but that Esquire column is terrible and wrong. A number of people are writing serious crit about games. There's no dominant critic, so he's right insofar as his headline is correct, but not for any of the reasons he talks about.

Sounds like a job for ILG!

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:16 (nineteen years ago)

It very much sounds to me like the production is background, in service of the singer.

This is precisely why the album is so fucking great.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

I love the album, Dan. I just don't think Danger Mouse deserves most of the credit for it.

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:39 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, did Danger Mouse write the vocal melodies? I kind of doubt it but if he did, I could actually see the point.

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

I love the album, Dan. I just don't think Danger Mouse deserves most of the credit for it.

(Psst Sundar! I think I'm agreeing with you because talking about GB is an order of magnitude more interesting than talking about Chuck Klosterman!) (Heh.)

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

I really doubt that DM wrote any of the melodies. Not only does it not seem like what he does, but it totally sounds like a Cee-Lo melody (I'm thinking that first single from his last record, Art of Noise I think?).

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

What's funny though is that the DM-as-auteur angle would've been spot-on had this article been about GORILLAZ rather than Gnarls Barkley.

xpost oh and all these melodies are just so totally Cee-Lo, all gospel-y and frantic...except on "Gone Daddy Gone", of course

mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

Also, if this article had been written about someone who has A) produced more than TWO albums and B) developed a more signature sound (like, I don't know, THE RZA or TIMBALAND or something), it would totally float.

mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

No one draws the hate on ILX like writers who actually have a reading audience.

shookout (shookout), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)

lol

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, I would say that noone draws the hate on ILX like people who, rather than engage with the actual content of whatever criticism a poster has written, accuse ILX en masse of being motivated entirely by jealousy of other people's success. Let's cut the childish (not to mention obvious and repetitive) ad hominem shit, kay? Thanks.

Matt LC (flightsatdusk), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

any less childish than getting upset over chuck fucking klosterman?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

Huh? Who's upset about Chuck Klosterman?

Matt LC (flightsatdusk), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

nickalicious:

off the top of my head-

The Grey Album
Ghetto Pop Life
The Mouse and the Mask
Demon Days
Gnarls Barkley
numerous one-offs

My math may be rusty, but I think that comes to more than two albums.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

Why exactly is it childish to criticize something that someone publically wrote about an artist you care about when everyone here, including the 'defenders,' agrees it's error-plagued and problematic? It's not as though Klosterman gets universal hatred here otherwise.

(I mean, no one would write "Michael Jackson was important because he was the voice that best articulated Quincy Jones' vision" or "Chuck D's was the voice that best articulated the Bomb Squad's vision" and I think there's stronger case for producer-as-auteur in both those cases. Anyway, Dan OTM. I'm outta here.)

2xpost

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

"a stronger case"

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

i guess "upset" was the wrong word to use. but the massive threads that get started everytime there's a lame article or review written by someone in pitchfork or the NY times or some shit does, to a non-writer, smack of jealousy, or at the very least a collective case of "narcissism of small differences".

but whatever. i'm a dumbass.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

and im really pissy right now because i got ripped off by someone

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)

today is like "regret everything you just posted right as you press the submit button" Day

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)

Another article about how black artists who read comics/watch cartoons/listen to prog, trip hop or Kate Bush/wear goofy costumes make more substantial music.

ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

even in the anecdote that's a "perfect example" of DM's supposed auteurship, Cee-Lo wrote the song. He obviously wasn't just along for the ride.

"We talked about this for hours, and then I went home. But while I was away, Cee-Lo took that conversation and made it into 'Crazy,' which we recorded in one take. That's the whole story. The lyrics are his interpretation of that conversation."

dmr (Renard), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

fuck yeah i'm jealous of klosterman. i wish i could write lazy bullshit articles like this one and get paid nytimes rates instead of slaving away actually doing my research for less money and exposure. if i could figure out how to exploit most peoples' commonly held assumptions (producers are smarter and more hard-working than singers, rock and roll is the only real music), i still probably wouldn't do it, so i guess i'm also jealous of either his complete lack of scruples or his profitable ignorance. i mean, wtf, a lot of us are music critics. why shouldn't we be jealous of a successful dude who also happens to be a complete hack?

yuengling participle (rotten03), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

Dull and unreadable and factually-questionable and has huge leaps in logic, but that's par for the course with Klosterman on music.

His Esquire columns are actually pretty good (even the video game one linked up top), so long as he stays away from his taste-making hipster critic persona.

milo z (mlp), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

not really sure who edited/fact checked Klosterman, but that person is kind of the last line of defense when it comes to shoddy reportage. Hackdom--if it is that--is the problem of his editors, not the writer. Judging from the widespread hatred for Klosterman on ILX, I guess his editors--who worked at very well regarded publications--must be pretty ignorant. I mean, he's such a hack and a lazy bullshit writer and all...


funny, the thing I hated most about that article was that it drew still more attention to song that I totally despise.

don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)

I think if someone can make sense out of the phrase "the album is a collaboration, but not in a creative sense" (I sure can't) then we're getting somewhere.

dmr (Renard), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

the message: be a hack get far! take notes, ILX

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

I think if someone can make sense out of the phrase "the album is a collaboration, but not in a creative sense" (I sure can't) then we're getting somewhere.

They worked together on the album but Cee-Lo had no input in any of the writing or interpretation; he just did what Dangermouse told him to do.

Baldly writing that out kind of took me aback, too.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

which is totally different from the process on The Mouse and the Mask because DM watched some Woody Allen movies in the meantime and didn't write MF Doom's raps

dmr (Renard), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

It's also not what happened on the Gnarls Barkley project according to both Dangermouse and Cee-Lo, which is the massive bone of contention ILM is having with the article.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

dan otm

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)

i walked by a coffeeshop in silicon valley yesterday. it was full of hip young software dudes who looked like younger versions of "the lone gunmen" from the x-files. there was some bearded young dude in birkenstocks with a guitar playing gnarls barkley covers.

case closed: gnarls barkley sucks

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

not really sure who edited/fact checked Klosterman, but that person is kind of the last line of defense when it comes to shoddy reportage. Hackdom--if it is that--is the problem of his editors, not the writer. Judging from the widespread hatred for Klosterman on ILX, I guess his editors--who worked at very well regarded publications--must be pretty ignorant. I mean, he's such a hack and a lazy bullshit writer and all...

a lot of what he got wrong isn't in the realm of the fact-checker though. but, ok this might be a us-uk thing, but imo the writer has JUST A LEETLE BIT of responsibility to make sure he is being truthful. checking facts means checking facts, not researching the article after the fact.

Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

it was full of hip young software dudes who looked like younger versions of "the lone gunmen" from the x-files.

Wait, this is logically inconsistent; looking like The Lone Gunmen by definition makes you deeply, utterly, painfully unhip, like Grandma-fell-down-the-Eiffel-Tower-stairwell unhip.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

sorry, should have read

full of "hip" young software dudes

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

okay, Dan, you seem trustworthy on this one:
didn't like DangerDoom, really hated the Grey Album
like Cee-Lo
love "Crazy"

Should I buy the album?

milo z (mlp), Monday, 19 June 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

CLARITY

(Still, I'm an actual hip software dude who looks nothing like a Lone Gunman and I'm listening to Nelly Furtado doing "Crazy" acoustically and singing lower than Cee-Lo. My point? THERE IS NO POINT!)

(xpost: I would listen to audio clips on Amazon first; there isn't really another "Crazy" on it but most of the other songs work a completely awesome vibe for three minutes and then end before you can get bored with them. Also there's an awesome suicide song and an awesome necrophilia song, but still I advocate try-before-you-buy because I don't know that you are as deeply into the Kool-Aid on stuff like this as I am.)

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

milo - Your taste seems like my own, and I would vote a big NO.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 19 June 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

"I thought the writer was trying too hard to make a phenomenon of DM."

Well, yeah. But I've never written for a general interest rag that didn't require that tack. The problem is that there's a tremendous amount of good music out there, and a limited amount of audience headspace, so you've got to argue THIS IS NOT JUST GOOD, IT'S SIGNIFICANT in order to get it past an editor who likely hasn't bought an album since Afternoon Delight.

And why is Hurting being all demure? We want to know whether your uncle is Popeye!

js (honestengine), Monday, 19 June 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think trying to turn Dangermouse into a phenomenon is that big of a deal as long as you get the facts correct in the process.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 June 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)

Well, yeah, but I think the emphasizing of Dangermouse ot the exclusion of Cee-lo in the creative process (I mean, because we're not arguing over the hyperbole of 'several octaves' are we?) is symptomatic of trying to make an artist more significant than he is rather than being a matter of fact. Klosterman puts forth an argument and then doesn't support it, but the argument (DM=Auteur) is one that's more likely to sell than "Indie Rap Producer and Rap Eccentric make fun, minimally challenging pop album that charts!" At least, it's easier to sell to the Paper of Record.

js (honestengine), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, this is logically inconsistent; looking like The Lone Gunmen by definition makes you deeply, utterly, painfully unhip, like Grandma-fell-down-the-Eiffel-Tower-stairwell unhip.

And you're disagreeing with software dudes looking painfully unhip?

*whistles*

San Diva Gyna (and a Masala DOsaNUT on the side) (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.xbhs.net/academics/faculty/rerikson/SurveySoftwareTools/images/G-BlockS1.jpg

"Hey guys, let's bash each other's heads in after work beyond that one 7-11 in Los Gatos off the freeway while listening to 'Crazy'! Wicked!"

San Diva Gyna (and a Masala DOsaNUT on the side) (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.xbhs.net/academics/faculty/rerikson/SurveySoftwareTools/images/G-BlockS1.jpg

"Hey guys, let's bash each other's heads in after work behind that one 7-11 in Los Gatos off the freeway while listening to 'Crazy'! Wicked!"

San Diva Gyna (and a Masala DOsaNUT on the side) (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

Whew, glad I wasn't the only one who had this reaction. Klosterman covers this world like he's watching a movie with the TV on mute and making up his own storyline in his head.

As I said in the blog, it really makes me appreciate how well Kelefa and Sasha cover this ground for the times/new yorker readership, often giving a "for dummies" primer but always getting the basics right.

Jay Smooth (jsmooth995), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

(I mean, because we're not arguing over the hyperbole of 'several octaves' are we?)

I don't think that's the main problem, but yeah, the fact that that's factually wrong means that you're less likely to believe anything else the guy says.

Klosterman puts forth an argument and then doesn't support it, but the argument (DM=Auteur) is one that's more likely to sell than "Indie Rap Producer and Rap Eccentric make fun, minimally challenging pop album that charts!" At least, it's easier to sell to the Paper of Record.

Sure. The argument that Cee-Lo and Danger Mouse are ex-lovers would be even more likely to sell. But it isn't true (I don't think anyway).

What I can't figure out is, if you're going to argue that Danger Mouse is an auteur, why not just acknowledge the similarities between Danger Mouse and Eno or Spector rather than make a weak, strained attempt at pointing out the differences? Don't say "because that wouldn't sell to the Times" - imagine the headline "The New Phil Spector."


Klosterman covers this world like he's watching a movie with the TV on mute and making up his own storyline in his head.

That's true, but it's also exactly why the 20% or so of his writing that is awesome is awesome.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.xbhs.net/academics/faculty/rerikson/SurveySoftwareTools/images/G-BlockS1.jpg
"Hey bros, let's review each other's 401ks after work behind that one Jamba Juice in Hyde Park off the freeway while listening to 'Bitches Brew'! Wicked!"

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

my contribution to the mashup scene / this thread

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

It's a hit or miss strategy imho. It's pretty harmless and informative when doing a long interview piece like this. At least the inaccuracies are transparent; sadly, this is still a better state of journalism than the vast majority out there, especially if you include blogs.

However, It's more annoying when a piece tries to make a point (really badly) at the expense/honor of the death of a member of Ratt when said point states Ratt meant more than the Ramones because Ratt sold more records... (oy oy oy!) but that's for another thread.

jubeat just rocked it.

San Diva Gyna (and a Masala DOsaNUT on the side) (donut), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

^ (Jay Smooth)

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

This thread has grown too long to respond piece by piece to people, but some of the bashers get a few things wrong (and demonstrate their own Klostermanians):

Cee Lo was a tough guy. If you go to the Dungeoneze forum, read the interviews with Khujo, Andre, Gipp etc, they all talk about him being a gangbanging bully. Not sure about a blood, but def. no teddy bear.

This is arguably the worst thing Cee Lo's ever been involved in (my opinion). Quite beyond the horrible sub-Ninja Tunes beats, his lyrics are awful:

It's deep how you can be so shallow
And I'm afraid cause I have no fear
And I didn't believe in magic
Until I watched you disappear

etc etc.

paulhw (paulhw), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)

Does someone want to write a letter to the Times on this one? They'd probably print it if it didn't have curses in it.

max (maxreax), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:53 (nineteen years ago)

just like those dudes, but beards, fatter (post-stanford), and t-shirts/tevas/cargo pants.

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Monday, 19 June 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

why does chuck klosterman get to write for the new york times?

i find that incredibly unfair. i mean, sure, i'm a youngin', but i tell you the troof: i could write a better article than this. it's bad on so many levels; not just the factual innaccuracies, but also that if he's writing to introduce an audience that knows nothing about hip hop or indie, he's done an incredibly poor job at making them understand it. why would you mention brian eno, and then imply that your reader doesn't understand the concept of a producer? why the pointless digs at the girls that think they're pretty? why mention steve albini, but assume your reader doesn't know about the pink floyd/wizard of oz connection?? why no mention of gorillaz until the last fucking paragraph, an album that so far has been way way waaaaay more successful and loved than gnarls, though give it time it might catch up!?

bah, that's all obvious shit. i don't get why this guy still gets paid to write this crap. "sex, drugs and cocoa puffs"? i read the first 30 or so pages and had to put it down because it made me want to find him hurt him! a lot! what an annoying douchebag! don't even!

Emily B (Emily B), Monday, 19 June 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)

How is Danger Mouse a DJ anyway, let alone a DJ Auteur?

JoB (JoB), Monday, 19 June 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

not just the factual innaccuracies, but also that if he's writing to introduce an audience that knows nothing about hip hop or indie, he's done an incredibly poor job at making them understand it.

That's because Chuck Klosterman doesn't really know that much about rap music.

max (maxreax), Monday, 19 June 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

not just the factual innaccuracies, but also that if he's writing to introduce an audience that knows nothing about hip hop or indie, he's done an incredibly poor job at making them understand it.
That's because Chuck Klosterman doesn't really know that much about rap music.

yeah, that's pretty obvious!

Emily B (Emily B), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 00:18 (nineteen years ago)

That's because Chuck Klosterman doesn't really know that much about rap music.

neither does the audience of the New York Times Magazine.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)

Even after reading this article.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)

how come goodie mob never inspired these kinda threads?

Bea Arthur - Lost COmic GEnius ? (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:35 (nineteen years ago)

I think because Goodie Mob never misrepresented an artist, or, indeed, a whole genre, in the national press. They mostly just made good music.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

my finger lingered long on the "delete whole thread" button for this one.

Bea Arthur - Lost COmic GEnius ? (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:40 (nineteen years ago)

I don't have much of a problem with the article, but asking Cee-Lo about his "gang tattoos" made me cringe. And the line about the pretty girls. Ick.

musically (musically), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:41 (nineteen years ago)

Some Perfectly Good Reasons to Hate Klosterman

http://www.nypress.com/16/35/news&columns/feature.cfm

Some More

http://www.nypress.com/18/33/news&columns/ames.cfm

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 01:51 (nineteen years ago)

though to be honest, i hated the cocoa puffs book so virulently i've pretty much purged the whole thing from my memory. there was some stuff about the real world, i recall, which is more than enough reason right there ...

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:03 (nineteen years ago)

god those new york press things were awful!

Period period period (Period period period), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:07 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha

Klosterman has apparently put out another book -- Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs: a Low Culture Manifesto -- an excellent review of which exists in the New York Press [by Mark Ames]: NYpress skewers bad rock writer. I admit I couldn't have done better.

And in my ramblings on the Worldwide Internet Web I came across a review of sorts that is maybe more revealing than the reviews of mine and Mark Ames put together. It is from the blog of a guy named Kneel, on the website Killoggs.com:

[all, sic] "never, never read. I just don't. Up until this point in my life I've probably only read a handful of books. And when I say handful, I'm talking like 4 or 5. But, when my now ex-girlfriend (we'll get into that later), J*** read me the first essay from Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa-Puffs, the whole time I was like 'I could have fuckin Written this book!' Chuck Klosterman is increadible!!! Really. I absolutely love this book. And this is from a guy who admits that he never reads."

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

(by this guy, who's neither here nor there ... i just like the quoted blurb)

http://www.ratbloodsoup.com/klosterm.html

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:13 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah those NY Press things were pretty shitty, and guilty of many of the same things that piss everyone off about Klosterman.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

i want Kneel to come over to ILM

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

Those NYPress reviews are far worse than anything Klosterman's ever written.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

given many of subjects discussed here, this is illuminating…

ttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743284887/sr=8-1/qid=1150750483/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-6690647-3762437?%5Fencoding=UTF8

veronica moser (veronica moser), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, Publishers Weekly reviews. They are eternal.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 02:52 (nineteen years ago)

i was referring to video, available on the above link, of Klost. on the Bill maher program, in which he refers to the limited amount of interview access common to them what interview people involved in show business.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)

not much for me to add here, except that this is the best thing i've yet read on klosterman:

http://www.gawker.com/news/chuck-klosterman/if-there-is-really-is-a-cult-of-klosterman-wed-like-to-provide-the-koolaid-181057.php

yetimike (McGonigal), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 06:09 (nineteen years ago)

Those NY Press pieces may be the worst pieces of published writing I've ever read!

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 07:44 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, well, they're definitely kabuki theater, ames is ... a real piece of work. but worse than anything by klosterman, or ever published? misundersestimation of the highest order! i call godwin's law.

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

I agree that this is the worst project Cee-Lo has ever been involved in, however, that doesn't make it not totally fucking so much more retarded awesome than like everything else right now.

The beats on Cee-Lo's first album (done by Cee-Lo) >>>>>>>>>>> Dangermouse beats.

mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

how come goodie mob never inspired these kinda threads?

Because we love Goodie Mob!

mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

i really do hate this fucking guy

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

C'mon, Ames is great. I disagree with the description of Klosterman's "ass-face" though. He looks more like a clapped-out old dyke. No offence.

everything (everything), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

bah, that's all obvious shit. i don't get why this guy still gets paid to write this crap.

It's obvious to you, but not the *average* reader. Why does he get to write this (so-called) crap? Because he has a track record. He's been published before. Have you? (Not a criticism, just to say that it's easier to get published in the NYT if you have a resume that doesn't merely include some blog entries here and there.)

Klosterman has apparently put out another book -- Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs: a Low Culture Manifesto -- an excellent review of which exists in the New York Press [by Mark Ames]: NYpress skewers bad rock writer. I admit I couldn't have done better.

Uh, yeah, that's been out for a long time.

I dunno, I don't like the guy's writing at all. It all seems so... witty if you're sitting at the bar drinking some Cuba Libres with the guy but then afterwards you have the hangover and you realize it's just not so deep, man. I always have this feeling that, while reading his articles/book, I'll admire the guy but then, afterwards I'll realize how extremely mediocre it all is. It's all very witty and haha funny at times but there's never any *zest* to his writing.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)

too many books, too little time, klosterman loses out

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i know, but you finish that book while wiping your ass on the loo.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Uh, yeah, that's been out for a long time.

yes; old link, i think.

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 19:35 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, those are some unreadably shitty reviews.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.gawker.com/assets/2006/06/chuckie.jpg

musically (musically), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

Those NY Press pieces are pretty fucking awful, almost insulting to the whole field of criticism. They deserve a far more severe drubbing. That review of Klosterman's book is just pissy adolescent ranting. I'm not offended by the writing, but it's certainly no better than Klosterman's stuff. It's a whole lot of "look at me, I'm hip, I get it, really I do!" Klosterman might be accused of the same thing, but at least he doesn't just spew out ad hominem attacks.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

It is kind of funny though, occasionally.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

i hope everyone who bought gnarls barkley buys the lovestink record when it comes out cuz its gonna be about 10x better

Bea Arthur - Lost COmic GEnius ? (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

It all seems so... witty if you're sitting at the bar drinking some Cuba Libres with the guy but then afterwards you have the hangover and you realize it's just not so deep, man.

This sums up pretty well why I tend to find Klosterman exceedingly annoying. He has this tic of trying to sum up a complex issue with a bold, simple, surprising - yet inevitably wrong - thesis. He does that in just about every chapter of Cocoa Puffs, and he does it again in this review. It seems to me that this review is an almost perfectly middling example of the profile of an "underground" artist that regularly crops up in the mainstream media (or MSM, for you blogger types). If this sort of profile doesn't annoy the artist's following, then it's probably doing something wrong. I honestly don't think that there's something exceptionally bad about this Klosterman piece (okay, crediting all the creative inspiration behind Gnarls to Dangermouse is pretty unforgivable, but other than that...) Yet there is still that ineffable whiff of Klostermanism about this article that makes me want to bang my head against the screen. So if people want to hate on it, they won't get any argument from me.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

wow he looks so different than on the jacket for fargo rock city! he's all cosmopolitan now!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)

cosmopolitan my ass, that's corey feldman

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

hahahaha

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.thiefsden.net/archives/grima.jpg

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

As far as I care, his Ayn Rand fandom is pretty much a dealbreaker, though I take some comfort in being absolutely certain that were she alive today, she'd probably spit in his cornflakes.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

http://images.hollywood.com/images/4_369172.jpg http://www.gawker.com/assets/2006/06/chuckie.jpg

grady (grady), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 00:10 (nineteen years ago)

his Ayn Rand fandom

Oh good grief, not ANOTHER one.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe we're all just a little KLOSTER-PHOBIC!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg http://www.nature.com/news/2002/020603/images/cricket_160.jpg

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~cult/stuff/Animated%20Gifs/tumbleweed.gif

gear (gear), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

http://binturong.us/pics/seven_sisters-2005_01/wind_blown_trees.jpg

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

Ayn Rand, huh? Ok, that's pretty fucking hideous.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 04:22 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe he's a big Rush fan?

Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Wednesday, 21 June 2006 04:39 (nineteen years ago)

Who edited this? It really is horrible.

Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 22 June 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

"unconventional tempos of the music"

What does that mean?

Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 22 June 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, he says it again: "unorthodox tempos"

Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 22 June 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, I just noticed someone already pointed that out. Sorry.

Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 22 June 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

"unorthodox tempos"

OMG, 121.5 bpm!!!

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 22 June 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

DOES TAHT MAKE ME CRAZY?!

argh! (whineyg), Thursday, 22 June 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://www.atia.org/davebarry.jpg

I'm Just Sayin' (Ian Christe), Friday, 23 June 2006 02:06 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://www.pebbles.hcii.cmu.edu/puc/localmedia/dave-barry-calendar.jpg

I'm Just Sayin' (Ian Christe), Friday, 23 June 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)

his soulmate:

http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/1999/04/26/chron500-oldnavyad.jpg

polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 23 June 2006 02:24 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.