American records that were viable '80s *New Pop*?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Three O'Clock - Arrive Without Travelling

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 00:14 (nineteen years ago)

what is the time frame? i'm guessing book of love are too late, right? and information society, too, right? what about missing persons and berlin? they might count. (unless i have no idea what the perimeters of "new pop" are, which is a very good possibility.)

figures on the beach? (too late too, maybe...)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 00:18 (nineteen years ago)

I guess the first couple Figures on a Beach records were like '83-'84? All these bands seem like they fit to me.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 04:34 (nineteen years ago)

any thread that starts with arrive without traveling is good by me, but vas ist der "new pop"?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 07:10 (nineteen years ago)

(i thot they were 'paisley underground')

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 07:11 (nineteen years ago)

the vels
comateens
ministry (pre-industrial)

the "paisley underground" bands such as Three O'Clock were plugged into the underground/indie/college-rock scene in the 80s which as a rule stood in opposition to the New Pop movement aka haircut bands.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 10:10 (nineteen years ago)

Anything in 1984 by:

Prince
Billy Ocean
Teena Marie
Cyndi Lauper
The Bangles
John Waite

...and about 50 others.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 12:18 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, but Mark, listen to that Three O'Clock record again. Produced by Mike Hedges, who did Associates/Marc Almond/Siouxsie.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

Alfred, I think there's a sort of new eighties vision of new wave component to "New Pop" that I don't see in Billy Ocean or John Waite. (Teena Marie maybe had more of this aesthetic on Emerald City, but that was '85, bro.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)

Relisten to "Loverboy" or "Caribbean Queen," Tim, and see if they don't fit the definition of New Pop proposed by, to pick a random name, Simon Reynolds.

And John Waite's "Missing You"?!? Oh man! The synth twinkles, chugging rhythm, the sound of that guitar -- not possible three years earlier.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

Plus, Figures on a Beach and Three O'Clock weren't played on the radio, so they're not techinically New Pop. NP has to be HEARD.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, "Missing You" totally sounded like a Police ballad.

And I definitely see Alfred's point about the 1984 Top 40. I think the Cars (certianly by the time of *Heartbeat City"*) figure heavily in the equation as well. Hell, "Boys of Summer" and BOTH "Jump"s (Van Halen and Pointer Sisters) probably do. But then again, as I confess above, I have no idea, really, how Simon or anyone else is defining "new pop." (I've never even read that *Like Punk Never Happened Book*! Though I do remember some old Simon Frith columns from those days.) So when I made my own nominations above, I was thinking specifically in terms of "Americans who wished they were British haircut bands." (And actually, I think Figures on a Beach *may* have gotten some pop airplay, in Detroit and Boston at least. Though, right, they never hit Top 40, which probably should matter.)

Anyway, here's one nobody will argue with: Til Tuesday!

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

"Figures on a Beach and Three O'Clock weren't played on the radio, so they're not techinically New Pop. NP has to be HEARD."

Oh, I don't buy this. I'm talking about it as a musical genre, not just a cultural phenomenon or something. Besides, plenty of the singles released by the basic New Pop canon of artists were not hits. (Plus, they released albums, which had lots of songs which also were not hits.)

Still not sure how Billy Ocean or John Waite presented a new eighties vision of a New! Wave! aesthetic. It's not just about instrumental sounds and production. (If it was, you could say that anyone's modern sounding pop record from the mid-eighties was "New Pop.")

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

It's not just about instrumental sounds and production.

But it is! And I never implied "just" either.

I'd define New Pop roughly as "singles and albums influenced by the intersection of New Wave, the MTV visual aesthetic, and the uptick in record sales which started around the time Thriller became mega."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)

Most of the Tina Turner Private Dancer singles (well, maybe "Let's Stay Together") don't count as New Pop. Journey's "Open Arms" from two years earlier isn't New Pop, but Steve Perry's "Oh Sherri" does.

Pat Benatar circa "Love is a Battlefield-We Belong-Invincible" was definitely New Pop, but the Crimes of Passion isn't.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

>a new eighties vision of a New! Wave! aesthetic<
> a sort of new eighties vision of new wave component<

Tim, what doe these cryptic phrases mean? You're talking in circles. Ocean's and Waite's music totally sounded '80s. How are they any less a new '80s vision than Missing Persons? I don't get that. (So, are YOU saying only the kind of Anglophiles I've been nominating should qualify? If you argue that somebody like the Cars or Van Halen is too "guitar oriented"--not that you have, but I suppose the argument could be made; I forget, were the Psychedelic Furs, say, considered "new pop"?--where does that leave Three O'Clock?) (Unless they had no guitars. Not like I've heard them in a quarter century.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)

The P-Furs are an interesting study as they, like the Journey-men and Benatar, straddle both sides. "Heartbeat" and "The Ghost in You" and their other 1984 hits were definitely their attempts to create New Pop

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)

How am I "talking in circles?" "New '80s vision of new wave" = Kajagoogoo. "New wave" is modernistic. Culture Club made records with much more of a modernist aesthetic than Don Henley ... er, I mean John Waite!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:20 (nineteen years ago)

"Ocean's and Waite's music totally sounded '80s."

Sure, but so did lite jazz albums from the mid-'80s.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, that's what I guessed - The Furs were like the Cars or Van Halen (or Tommy Shaw or Rush or Lou Gramm or Queen or Yes or ZZ Top or Huey Lewis), guitar-oriented rock guys who wound up making a new wave pop move.

Anyway, how about Laura Branigan? Or Irene Cara? Or Ray Parker Jr.?

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

Laura Branigan and Irene Cara have more in common with Eurodisco than New Pop, right? (especially Branigan).

I don't know about Ray Parker Jr. "The Other Woman" sounds like Emotional Rescue-era Stones, no? "Ghostbusters" is New Pop once removed since it lifts that Huey Lewis riff.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

i'm trying to think of american 80's college rock bands i listened to that i considered new wave. definitely ministry. that's a given. i really liked flavor crystals by the suburban lawns. and love is the law by the suburbs. but they both had that indie/rock element to them. maurice & the cliches were from canada. i loved their big single. but they don't count. yeah, book of love should count. i wore that boy twelve-inch out! i guess the dominatrix sleeps tonight is too arty/dancey maybe. boy, we wore that one out too.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

And how did Culture Club sound more "modernistic" than John Waite or Billy Ocean or "Boys of Summer"? Sorry, I still don't get that. Boy George sang like he wanted to be Smokey Robinson! "Karma Chameleon" took its main hook from "Handy Man" by James Taylor. And sure, it was great. But in what way does it sound more new wave than "Missing You"? Tim, it seems to me that you keep inisting there was some new pop vision, and you haven't really explained what the vision was, or what it sounded like. (Actually, if Culture Club's sonic vision was closest to anybody's it was probably Hall and Oates's! Or sure, Paul Young's maybe. But hey, he covered a Hall and Oates song, right?)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

Also I just realized Billy Ocean can't count since he was born in Trinidad then moved to England (where I believe he may have had a hit or two in the '70s) before coming to the States. (He WAS new pop though, at least as much as Eddy Grant in the '80s was new pop.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

anyway, here's two more big ones, probably:

Tony Basil, "Mickey"
Moon Unit Zappa featuing Frank, "Valley Girl"

I'm guessing lots of stuff from L.A. was VERY new pop, actually.

And come to think of it, what about the Go-Gos? (More so as they moved along.) (And the Motels, maybe? Or were they too ballad heavy?)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

i guess he really just wants examples of american bands that sounded like kajagoogoo.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

a lot of the best american new wave came out in the 70's.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)

culture club really did seem ultra-mod when i first heard them. especially coupled with the videos. i was blown away by church of the poison mind when i first heard it. i didn't know much about soul music and r&b back then though. the belle stars doing needle in the haystack blew me away too.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

>how did Culture Club sound more "modernistic" than John Waite or Billy Ocean or "Boys of Summer"?<

Again, it's not just about sound - lite jazz albums also sounded '80s - it's about the whole package. I said they had more of a modernist aesthetic overall. More futuristic, perhaps.

>"Karma Chameleon" took its main hook from "Handy Man" by James Taylor. And sure, it was great. But in what way does it sound more new wave than "Missing You"?<

Well, I suppose the Babys were sort of considered new wave? But New Pop is, I think, about the new '80s vision of new wave which, yes, came mostly from the English groups.

"i guess he really just wants examples of american bands that sounded like kajagoogoo."

No, don't be an ass.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/totp2/features/wallpaper/images/1024/culture_club.jpg

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)

new pop is a british term, no? i only remember new wave, new romantics, and new rock.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

oh, and i second the comateens. who i love and adore. what a great group.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)

and the vels! i second them too. and even early pretty poison. and robert hazard. and even executive slacks. thought they were a bit later. philly had it going on.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

yeah new pop was a brit construction.

tim these guys are fuckin witch ya. john waite was new wave by association, while culture club defined the genre's MTV phase..

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

Jermaine Stewart-Word Is Out

Arthurgh! A Music War (Arthur), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

OK maybe ANYBODY who had a US hit in 1984 is functionally new pop (see Alfred's initial post) but I think the British wave of Culture Club/Duran/Thompson Twins et al were consciously new pop. a self-conscious movement w/ a commercial aesthetic as opposed to a chart moment of happenstance. what a great year for pop, tho!

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

I have never heard of this "new pop" tag, but just as xhuxk mentioned Til Tuesday, I was thinking, "Man, this sounds like what the entire city of Boston was doing in the '80s." That city really seemed hot for this aesthetic, which heavily influenced late-80s Boston-based college rock.

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

don't forget tuxedomoon's "creatures of the night". that song slays. and speaking of philly, little gentlemen! nobody remembers them though. they did a cool ultravox cover.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

the hooters were new pop, no? and I thought tuxedomoon were like the residents or something...learn something new everday on ILM [tm]

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

but really, the 70's was where it was at for really new new wave and/or pop in this country. not just the cars (let the good times roll alone!) and devo, but all kinds of skinny tie hijinx and synth action. and all that great l.a. pop/punk. the weirdos and the dickies made awesome new wave.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

tuxedomoon got arty later. their first ep is awesome goth/new wave.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

Do the Records "Starry Eyes" fit this category?

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

Pulsallama, Gleaming Spires, Slow Children, Shox Lumania.


Minus the popularity, though, I guess.

Re: The Records. They weren't American, were they?

Arthurgh! A Music War (Arthur), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, gleaming spires. and don't forget sparks. or romeo void.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

has there been a thread discus abt New Wave 70s VS New Wave 80s?

cause ppl use the term now to describe 80s "new pop" but I remember it being used interchangeably w/punk to describe bands like Talking Heads and Pere Ubu. And then, as Scott says, came the deluge: the Cars, power pop. and Pulsallama hahaha. they were like the cool kids in school circa 1982 in the east village (and I was total nerd)

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

I think Pulsallama were originally a goof on the more faux-tribal aspects of early Bananarama, circa "Aie Mwana". Which is pretty new pop. Their shows were really fun. Remember Strange Party, the Klaus Nomi spinoff band with Joey Arias? I always thought they were like the New York version of Animal Nightlife.

Arthurgh! A Music War (Arthur), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

'Til Tuesday and Romeo Void circa "A Girl in Trouble" definitely count (why were critics so enthusiastic about them initially? b/c a chick sang "I might like you better if we slept together" instead of a man?). So did the Hooters (I guess I can lump them with Cyndi Laupder). And Charlie Sexton's "Beat's So Lonely."

Again, it's not just about sound - lite jazz albums also sounded '80s - it's about the whole package. I said they had more of a modernist aesthetic overall. More futuristic, perhaps

I have no idea how Culture Club, or any of the bands we've mentioned, fit this description. And my initial posts defined what 'the whole package' was anyway.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

i was blown away by church of the poison mind when i first heard it

otm. probably one of the only songs from my youth that i distinctly remember hearing for the very first time.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Sunday, 25 June 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

Is Roseanne Cash new pop?

Arthurgh! A Music War (Arthur), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

Is Roseanne Cash new pop?

Good choice! With 1985's Rhythm & Romance she made the leap (check out her dyed bangs on the cover).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

>what the entire city of Boston was doing in the '80s<

Yeah, isn't that also where Exude, of "Boys Just Want To Have Sex" fame, were from? And Scott is very right about Philly; I was going to say that myself but I was having trouble coming up with names -- Pretty Poison are the PERFECT example of this stuff. (I feel like there were similar groups from Detroit, too, but I'm coming up blank on specific names.) Romeo Void seem like a smart nomination, too.

Marginal possibilities (and no, I'm not trying to mess with Tim at all; as I said in my very first post, which was ALL Anglophiles, it's just that it's really not clear to me where the line's supposed to be drawn; is "new pop" the same as "new wave" or not? and can ONLY Anglophile Americans qualify?), anyway: B-52s, Devo circa "Whip It", Steve Miller's "Abracadabra," Corey Hart, and, uh, MADONNA! (Though Corey's Canadian, right? So maybe he doesn't count. And I'm not saying these other guys necessarily do; just saying they MIGHT.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

Also Devo and the 52s were about 100 times as futuristic as Boy George!

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

Corey Hart's "Sunglasses at Night" is American New Pop in its purest form.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

North American, rather, but if Rush can count, so can Corey Hart.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

like John Waite, Corey was a cornfed arena-rocker in new pop drag

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

his follow-up to "Sunglasses" IIRC was ghastly sub-springsteenism

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

and where is HE now? "life after new pop" coming soon on VH1

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

But New Pop WAS "just" drag, right? How else do you explain Don Henley, Benatar, Perry, Billy Ocean, etc affecting itJ?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

Henley & Benatar tarted up their sound w/synth coloring to affect that new pop sheen, but I don't think Steve Perry or esp. Billy Ocean would've made vastly different records if the MTV-hyped vision of new wave wasn't busting out all over. And I am now overcome w/the urge to hear "Oh Sherry" for the first time in twenty years.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

> cornfed arena-rocker <

wait, so only americans raised on fish and chips qualify now? that's *really* gonna limit things. (oddly, though, i associate the hooters as much with "roots rock" as with "new wave"--like, they were zydeco fans who belong in the same category of *lonesome jubilee*. or marah antecedents, maybe. i know this is completely off-base, and simply my misinterpretation of their use of melodica. but i can't help it.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

okay, more, probably:

Johnny, Are You Queer? - Josie Cotton
A Woman's Got The Power - The A's
88 Lines About 44 Women - The Nails
It's A Night For Beautiful Girls - The Fools
Jeopardy - Greg Kihn
I Know What Boys Like - The Waitresses
Whirly Girl - OXO

AND THE STRAY CATS!! (I think.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

i know there've probably been threads on this that i've just slept on, but after going and reading j.h.'s pitchfork thing on "new pop" from last fall... am i alone in being totally unconvinced of the usefulness of this term? nothing in this thread so far convinces me that it provides any kind of structure that you can hang much critical insight on.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

(i mean, you know, back in the '80s we just called that stuff pop.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)

Stray Cats and lotsa others mentioned here appeared in Star Hits magazine the bible of US/UK newpop (I know Creem covered it too but remained metal-identified to some degree). With "cornfed" I was just goofing on the faux-cosmopolitan airs of new pop/new wave. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips ruled in Ohio!

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

actually this book is the bible of new pop. gypsy, this would set you straight on what was going on in 1984. maybe. in the UK anyway.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0571137393/203-0175356-9755150?v=glance&n=266239

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't read that book, but the snobbishness of the title has alwayss bothered me.

am i alone in being totally unconvinced of the usefulness of this term?

I first read it in Christgau's review of Duran Duran's 1989 hits compilation: "...they pretend their decade didn't end around 1984-'85, when U.K. new pop conquered the world and went phfft."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

Rimmer's title was a send-up of a certain attitude toward pop. rockism I believe was the term....

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I mentioned that book up above. Don't know if I've ever even *seen* a copy of the thing, to be honest. But it's clearly the Bible of the "movement," if there actually was such a movement. (In a great essay Christgau did about one of the early New Music Seminars, he talked about how the going industry term for new wave type stuff at that time was, uh, "New Music." NOBODY remembers that, though.)

Were any of the actual Brit "new pop" groups rock bands, without synthesizers? If not, I guess you could stipulate that being a rock band without synths (especially one who did actual live shows *before* recording a debut album) automatically disqualifies a group from newpopdom, which would probably discount Stray Cats, the A's, the Fools, the Waitresses, the B-52s, and maybe even Romeo Void.

Also, nobody has mentioned Lene Lovich! She counts, right? (Unless, and this would go for Shox Lumania and maybe Gleaming Spires and who knows who else too, she wasn't pop *enough.* Like, is it possible to have been *too* futuristic to be new pop? Or maybe just too weird?)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i'm just not sure calling all that stuff "new pop" really buys you much, critically. that's all. it seems to me you end up lumping a bunch of things together that are either already lumped together anyway for various obvious reasons, or, conversely, that don't really need to be lumped together (like, i don't know what putting billy ocean, the 3 o'clock and greg kihn on some list tells you except that, um, these records all came out within a few years of each other).

also, i've seen that "like punk never happened" book before, but haven't read it so i don't know if it's good or not. if the title's really intended sardonically, that's good to know. cuz culture club sure as hell did not make it seem like punk had never happened. (anymore than blondie did.) (and if there is such a thing as new pop, surely blondie qualifies?) (or is new pop something different than new wave? because that's also what we called this stuff in the '80s.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

>culture club sure as hell did not make it seem like punk had never happened<

When I was in the Army in the early '80s, soldiers who liked punk rock were quite frequently addressed as "Boy George." True story!

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:21 (nineteen years ago)

yeah boy george seemed pretty punky to me when i was 12.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)

Were any of the actual Brit "new pop" groups rock bands, without synthesizers

Aztec Camera, at least initially.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

IIRC there was a really big distinction between new pop and rock.

"new music" = basically equalled everything not being played on commercial radio or MTV. "college rock" later known as indie rock, then alternative rock, then I don't know eat shit and die rock.

The Smiths and Aztec Camera sorta got lost in the terminology seeing as they were Brits w/guitars. I always thought the Smiths = the English REM but oh man most US "college rockers" didn't agree.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

I was always under the impression that "New Pop" referred not just to the way the bands made music, but also to their relationship with the music industry, i.e., they were sort of blatantly shooting for Top-40 hits with synthesizers in a "fuck you rock 'n roll" kind of way--see ZTT and Frankie Goes to Hollywood as the prime examples.

I could be wrong tho.

max (maxreax), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, regarding Lene Lovich: too early, too weird.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

I was always under the impression that "New Pop" referred not just to the way the bands made music, but also to their relationship with the music industry, i.e., they were sort of blatantly shooting for Top-40 hits with synthesizers in a "fuck you rock 'n roll" kind of way--see ZTT and Frankie Goes to Hollywood as the prime examples.

Reynolds says as much in his big ol' book -- the unmitigated careerism of Duran, Eurythmics, the reconfigured Scritti Politti. But was it true in America? We have a problem with shooting for hits.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

I think there was some strain of "pop bands trying to be subversive about capitalism by revelling it and doing songs about economic issues for example shopping"; i.e., M and ABC and Scritti Politti and Heaven 17 and the Pet Shop Boys. But I'm guessing that was only *part* of new pop, not all of it. Like, I doubt A Flock of Seagulls gave a shit about that crap whatsoever, bless their owl haircuts.

Motorhead were Brits with guitars! But I guess they were too ugly.

xp: You left out "modern rock" (that's what it was called in the Church/Midnight Oil/Love and Rockets era, if I remember right.)

More nominations: Wall of Vooodoo! and Oingo Boingo! (Too weird, again? Actually, I'm not sure I've ever actually heard Oingo Boingo.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:31 (nineteen years ago)

>Also Devo and the 52s were about 100 times as futuristic as Boy George!<

Were they? Devo's robot schtick was already established in the late '70s when their first couple of major label records came out. Was Culture Club's vision not a little fresher than what Devo was doing around 1983? I would think so. And B-52s had way more retro-isms (early rock and roll retroism was more of a '70s new wave component, no?).

This, btw, should go to addressing Alfred's professed lack of comprehension re. Culture Club as modernist/futurist overall aesthetic: '80s new pop people as futuristic friendly monster people or whatever they were. Like this guy:

http://www.lyricsvault.net/halloffame/limahl.jpg

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

New Ro guys qualify because rooted in futuristic monster people aesthetic of Roxy Music:

http://www.multinet.no/~jonarne/Hjemmesia/Favorittartister/roxy_music/brian_eno.jpg

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

ABC and Heaven 17 are good choices (although the latter scored no American hits). So are Oingo Boingo.

Tears for Fears certainly count.

I omitted the Pet Shop Boys cuz they arrived at the end of the New Pop boom, and augured a more serious turn (as opposed to "merely" making frivolous chartbound pop). I always heard them lumped with Depeche Mode, New Order, the Cure, etc.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

The New Romantics were a strictly UK phenomenon, fizzling after just a year. Its biggest acts (like Spandau Ballet and Duran; Ultravox, less so) later became New Popists.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:42 (nineteen years ago)

Their earlier records are not "New Pop?"

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)

Also, I am not convinced the Smiths and Aztec Camera were called new pop! (In 1984, they were more likely classified, along with Prefab Sprout, as "new groups Elvis Costello recommends." At least that's how I remember it.) (And if them, why not Echo and the Bunnymen, or Teardrop Explodes, or Big Country, or the Alarm, or UFucking2? Those were all the U.K. equivalent of the paisley underground, I think. And in general, I'm pretty sure they were considered more *serious* than the new pop types, by all those damn *Melody Maker* rockists.)

> And B-52s had way more retro-isms (early rock and roll retroism was more of a '70s new wave component, no?).<

They also came from Planet Claire and drove a Plymouth satellite faster than the speed of light. (Again, where is the comparable futurism in Culture Club? Just 'cause their fans had yellow hair?) (And sure, to Akron punk rockers, Devo may have been old flowerpot hat by '83, but not to people listening to the Top 40, I don't think. And retro shtick hardly died in the '80s; again, see Stray Cats etc. '80s new wave mainly just picked up where '70s new wave left off. Really, you can probably just blame it all on Roxy Music.)


xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)

OK, but I do think "New Pop" was a NEW new wave and that '70s new wave acts still making records in 1984 (without being very aesthetically congruent with the bands originally referred to as "New Pop") necessarily fit in.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, okay, I gather that one thing that may have happened in the early '80s, in England if not here, was a certain merging of new wave sensibilities, whatever the heck that means, with bubblegum/top 40/post-Abba sensibilities. So there was bands like, um, Bucks Fizz doing, well, whatever Bucks Fizz did. (And other examples too! I remember this being convincingly explained in *New York Rocker* once.) Not sure if that connects to "new pop," though, or if so, how.

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the b-52's futurism was retro shtick, a la the jetsons and buck rogers.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

Re. your post above: I actually think Reynolds is saying in his book that Echo/Teardrop/U2 is part of the New Pop.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

Here are Reynolds' New Pop bands: The Associates, Altered IMages, Simple Minds, Eurythmics, Thompson Twins, Wham!, Culture Club, ABC, the Human League, Scritti Politti.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

X-post to gypsy: Yes, and that strikes me as more of a '70s new wave component than a New Pop component. (At least until Men Without Hats' Pop Goes the World, anyway! Which perhaps reintroduced some early rock and roll elements? I remember that retro looking guitar - a Gretsch or something? - the guy is holding in a photo on the inner sleeve.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

xp (some of these questions were being answered as I typed, wow!)

Also, weren't the BIGGEST new pop group Human League (who started out as some artsy Joy Division style gloom band)? It seems to me is that *Dare* was Frith's main reference point about the phenomenon.

Spandau Ballet started out sort of as funk wannabees before they purchased all that frilly new romantique evening wear, didn't they? With "Chant No. 1", around the same time Heaven 17 did "Fascist Groove Thang"? At least I associated those bands as being related, and maybe Fad Gadget too, which was somewhat ridiculous of me. (Also, how does Wham! fit into all this? Any way they want, I bet!)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

if i were gonna call anyone new pop it would be the human league. if i can't call them new wave. except when they were post-punk.

we called them electro-pop back in the day. if anyone is making a list. but seriously, there was a new wave show in 1980/81 on the big rock station where i lived and they called this stuff new-rock. that's where i first heard culture club and talk talk by talk talk.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

haha, human league x-post with chuck.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

I think Simon totally went off the rails in the last third of the book, lumping all that stuff together. Xhxk is right about this, Echo/Teardrop/U2 were a discrete mini-movement of their own who got lumped in w/new pop when they hit the states. at first. that live EP elevated U2 to arena-rock godhood. That's what happened in general, I'd say, various sub-groups genres trends and movements in the UK got tagged as new wave/new pop when they hit our shores. A band like Echo were trendy boho/college faves in 1982 then got discovered by teenage girls in the magic year of 1984.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

shit i've gotta start cooking dinner. you guys are ON FIRE.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

Spandau Ballet started out sort of as funk wannabees before they purchased all that frilly new romantique evening wear, didn't they?

It was the other way around: they bought the pirate gear and asymmetric haircuts before they discovered Bryan Ferry.

Speaking of Ferry, he and Roxy circa Flesh & Blood were really the biggest influences on the New Popists in that they dressed well and scored big hits using received funk rhythms. God, which makes Spandau and ABC's funk rhythms thirdhand, if you think about it.

Echo/Teardrop/U2 were a discrete mini-movement of their own who got lumped in w/new pop when they hit the states. at first. that live EP elevated U2 to arena-rock godhood

The arena-rock moves distinguished them, true. Plus, Echo and U2 (Big Country too) wrote songs About Something, right? They would have been horrified to be marketed with Haircut 100.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

roxy music were the biggest influence on everything everywhere forever, it seems. them and bowie.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

How popular WAS Echo on the American college scene? Were Heaven Up Here, Crocodiles and Ocean Rain revered like U2's stuff? Their biggest hit was the eponymous 1987 album, but their fans hate it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

multiple xps: We called Human League (+ Soft Cell etc) "techno-pop."

I mean, one thing people really have to understand is that, when Simon Reynolds writes about "post-punk" or "new pop," it doesn't necessarily mean those phrases were widely used when that music actually existed, and if they were, they weren't always used exactly as he defines them. At least not in the U.S. (And possibly not even so much in the U.K. either, unless you happened to have a sociology PhD.) (Actually, I don't know that; it's possible they were very common in NME and MM at the time. Does he quote reviews from then?)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

"Were Heaven Up Here, Crocodiles and Ocean Rain revered like U2's stuff?"

no. the u.s. greatest hits comp made more of an impact than anything else. and john hughes/dancing horses. wait, wasn't dancing horses in a movie? john hughes broke everyone on the way down. omd. simple minds.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

actually, the people are strange cover might be what a lot of people remember about echo here.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

revisionist history, bigtime. I believe Rimmer coined new pop, either in Smash hits or the Face.

on Echo's initial audience: hard to say. I was out of college by then, saw Echo play live several times 1981-84 and they were superb, a great rock & roll band. but my rock critic confreres HATED them, a "haircut band."

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

>shit i've gotta start cooking dinner. <

me too! (okay, i'm gonna get out the ginger for the two-way thai chicken now...)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

This thread is funny.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

I guess a reason to lump Echo and U2 in as New Popists would be that their early records still seemed to be new visions of new wave and were big and modern sounding with commercial aspirations. A little later, they became sticks in the mud and bands kind of like them like maybe Big Country (?) perhaps appeared as sticks in the mud right out of the gate?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

Check out this link: http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id199.htm

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

A little later, they became sticks in the mud and bands kind of like them like maybe Big Country (?) perhaps appeared as sticks in the mud right out of the gate?

But Big Country got a gold record before U2 did (Echo never got close). I remember BC and U2 marketed together until The Joshua Tree.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

Lots of muddy sticks get gold records.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)

"We called Human League (+ Soft Cell etc) "techno-pop."

same here! apparently western connecticut liked lots of different terminology. techno-pop, electro-pop, new wave, new rock, we liked it all! but never new pop. i was blessed with a very good college radio station all thru the 80's for all manner of newwave/punk/indie. WHCN. Thanks, guys!

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:20 (nineteen years ago)

i bought the first big country album cuz someone in the village voice mentioned adam and the ants in their review of it. why they mentioned adam and the ants i can't remember. but i bought it.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

I remember U2 and Big Country being explicitly talked about in terms of "the return of guitars" or even "the return of real instruments." So I'm totally stumped about Simon could be lump them in with the new poppers; if anything, they were seen as a *reaction* to (the stuff now being called, and theoretically somehow called then) new pop. They were regular upstanding young men, not in girls's clothes! (Unless that was just the reaction in the US -- finally, some honest British guys who weren't a bunch of faggots! But I kinda doubt it.)

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

Regardless of its history, let us welcome the term! Even if we cannot ultimately agree whether the genre includes Pat Benatar or not!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

I remember U2 and Big Country being explicitly talked about in terms of "the return of guitars" or even "the return of real instruments." So I'm totally stumped about Simon could be lump them in with the new poppers; if anything, they were seen as a *reaction* to (the stuff now being called, and theoretically somehow called then) new pop.

No, Simon DOES take this approach. It was the counter-revolution, so to speak.

(As a sidenote I just flipped thru Chris Heath's 1990 Pet Shop bio. Neil Tennant says that their American handlers referred to them as "this year's Tears for Fears.")

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)

i think U2 attributes all of their success in the u.s. to the fact that they toured their asses off in the states for years when nobody knew or cared who they were. and a lot of bands weren't willing to do that. or couldn't do that. long thankless tours are very rock. heaven 17 on the other hand were EXCELLENT on Solid Gold.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

"Regardless of its history, let us welcome the term!"

i'm not welcoming it. i like calling things new wave. i'm a waver.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

"we paid our dues that's why we can sing the blues"

xp
hahaha there's a bit somewhere in that book where Neil pisses on Big Country from a great height

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha there's a bit somewhere in that book where Neil pisses on Big Country from a great height

haha, actually, he pisses on U2! And he really loses his temper. I'll find the quote.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)

the rockier people got, and the more commercial people got, the bigger they got here. simple minds, tears for fears, depeche mode, omd etc. maybe that's true everywhere though.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

x-posts: Yeah, Reynolds certainly distinguishes Echo/U2 in that way, but I didn't realize that they were definitely NOT being considered under the New Pop umbrella.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

Though I dunno, maybe there was a MOMENT, when "I Will Follow" first came out as a single, that U2 were thought of as somehow aligned with Gang of Four or Joy Division or Spandau Ballet. Come to think of it, I think there was! So maybe that's what Simon means. But damn, that moment passed really quick. Remember, this was also the era of great American bands like X writing songs about how British glitter disco syntheszier nightschool twerps were taking over from the true upstanding Americans with guitars. And, in the American music press, that was definitely a major theme - That Del Lords and REM and Replacements and Los Lobos and Husker Du were winning music back for the Yanks. Really, it's the start of indie rock, when you get down to it. And obviously, in a lot of ways, it was a very conservative impulse (one which I pretty much bought, at the time!) But in 1983, the Brit bands with guitars were deemed OK, somehow.

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

it was disco sucks all over again.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

That Three O'Clock record is interesting in terms of the debate because I think they were influenced by the basic New Pop canon, but also Echo - so it all got lumped together there.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

i guess i do prefer sad trenchcoat tears for fears over long-hair beatlesy tears for fears.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

these bands:

The Associates, Altered IMages, Simple Minds, Eurythmics, Thompson Twins, Wham!, Culture Club, ABC, the Human League, Scritti Politti.


certainly don't make me think of echo and u2.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

Well, of course not.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

That X song Chuck refers to was recorded in 1983, which is when R.E.M., Husker Du, the Minutemen, etc were just hitting their stride -- at the peak of New Pop's ascendancy in the UK and U.S.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

To be fair to U2 I'm not sure that they've tried to say anything interesting about anything. They write incredibly traditional pop sonsg. But it's their style and presentation that's so pompous. Like, you get Big Country who go to Moscow and say "do you get the message?" Well, what is the message? The message is that they're promoting a new album (Peace In Our Time). But you're not supposed to say that or you're accused of being cynical. The fact is that they've used an enormous media event to launch their new album. As it happens, unsuccessfully. But you're supposed to think that the total aim of what they do is to make a sincere statement about world peace.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

i think U2 attributes all of their success in the u.s. to the fact that they toured their asses off in the states for years when nobody knew or cared who they were. .

and to college radio. i've seen interviews with bono where he gives big props to the college stations. and college radio, interestingly or not, stayed pretty rock-oriented through this whole era. some of the synth bands got airplay (especially people like heaven 17, who didn't have u.s. hits), but it was much more guitar bands like echo, teardrop, r.e.m., etc. so if you're gonna invent a category of american new pop, one place to start might be stuff that got more commerical airplay than college airplay.

xpost: i really still think of the 3 o'clock as being much more influenced by west coast and u.k. '60s pop than anything else.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

i said it before on another thread, i think u2 were fairly unique. they don't remind me of many people when i hear them. they don't remind me of echo/teardrop. big country a little. the skids maybe a little bit more. but they are not, or were not, a band that sounded like a hundred other bands. i don't know why i'm bringing this up.

and synth-pop! i forgot one.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

>these bands: The Associates, Altered IMages, Simple Minds, Eurythmics, Thompson Twins, Wham!, Culture Club, ABC, the Human League, Scritti Politti.

certainly don't make me think of echo and u2.<

But there were other aesthetics, too - were Madness New Pop or Siouxsie?

Gypsy, check out a song like "Hand in Hand" on Arrive Without Travelling. (And of course after that they wanted Ian Broudie to produce them and then they made a record for Paisley Park.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

"and college radio, interestingly or not, stayed pretty rock-oriented through this whole era."

see, this is where i lucked out. my hometown station was in LOVE with synth-pop. for years. and dance pop music (din da da, dominatrix,madonna, etc). i was very fortunate. i heard tons of stuff.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

such a great time for 12 inches. i would hear ebn ozn or kissing the pink or tin tin and immediately go out and buy the 12 inch.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

jesus, i totally meant WXCI! not WHCN. WHCN was one of the connecticut rock stations.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)

Like, you get Big Country who go to Moscow and say "do you get the message?" Well, what is the message? The message is that they're promoting a new album (Peace In Our Time).

That's precisely what Greil Marcus said in one of the ArtForum essays collected in In the Fascist Bedroom. He deconstructs the semiotics of a Big Country video from '86 or '86 -- a bit unfair, actually, since they were well past their peak (insofar as Big Country had one).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 20:59 (nineteen years ago)

a late 80's WXCI playlist of sorts!!!! bless you, internet:


http://www.geocities.com/xci_realitybreak/wxci/music.html


a lot of that stuff i heard for the first time on that station as it came out.


american college radio at its finest!

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)

Oingo Boingo! (Too weird, again? Actually, I'm not sure I've ever actually heard Oingo Boingo.)

You have if you saw Weird Science: My ceation, is it real?

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)

(Oh and gypsy of course I'm not saying that '60s psych didn't remain a huge element for the Three O'Clock throughout - though maybe slightly diminshed on the last two albums.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

So Tim, what strain of Brit new pop did 3:00 sound like, anyway? You haven't explained yet why you think they qualify. Did *they* have synthesizers? (I just remember them as being the most insufferably twee of the paisley underground bands, but that was a million years ago, and I could be very wrong. I do think "Three O'Clock: From the Paisley Underground to Paisley Park* would be a great best-of title.)

>ebn ozn or kissing the pink or tin tin <

Scott, what country were these bands from? I was almost thinking of nominating Kissing the Pink for American newpopitude status upthread, but then I realized I have no idea. What I do know is they were supposed to be a big influence on early Chicago house music -- outside of Telex, they might be the only technopoppers on that great 12-LP *History of the House Sound* vinyl box set, which matters!

And of course, I associate Ebn Ozn with Freez: vowel-rock rules!

Finally, "Black Flag Kills Ants on Contact" (a slogan, not a song) of course totally belongs alongside that X song in the Revolutionary War against Limey nancy-boy noble savage drum drum drum pantheon.

xhuxk (xheddy), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

ebn ozn were american. i think. kissing the pink were british. so was tin tin.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

It's hard to put a finger on which band they might be sounding like from song to song, Chuck, but yeah, they did have a synth player and a more modern guitar sound. Working on a piece about them, actually, and have interviewed two of them so far and they definitely have stated that they were into the new English pop at the time and wanted to be a commercial group and be on the radio (thus the decision ultimately for Mike Hedges to produce their first record when they got signed to I.R.S.).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:32 (nineteen years ago)

man, that list brings me back. of course, there is a ton missing fom it. the guy who compiled it was there in the late 80's. and there is 90's stuff on it. jeezus, that rose of avalanche song. they used to play that ALL THE TIME. no vitamin z on that list. they used to play their big hit all the time. burning flame. or as i liked to call it, burning flamer. i was soooooooooooooo funny when i was 17. i'm convinced i would be a totally different person if it wasn't for that radio station. for one thing, i probably wouldn't still be listening to the passion puppets . i mean, i went out and bought the primitive painters 12 inch after i heard it on the radio. which led to a scary felt obsession that is still going strong.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, here's that Neil Tennnant quote dismissing U2:

"What [rock critics} basically want is for it to be like 1969 again. It 's this thing where British – or in U2's case, Irish – groups discover the roots of American music. U2 have discovered this and they're just doing pastiches [his voice rises] and it's reviewed as a serious thing because DYLAN PLAYS ORGAN on some song and B.B. King plays on some throwaway pop song `When Love Comes to Town' that could have been written by Andrew Lloyd Webber. It could be in Starlight Express if you ask me.

...We hate everything that they are and stand for. We hate it because it's totally stultifying, it says nothing, it is big and pompous and ugly. We hate it for exactly the same reasons Johnny Rotten said he hated dinosaur groups in 1976. To me U2 are a dinosaur group. They're saying nothing but they're pretending to be something. I think they're FAKE."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

as opposed to big and pompous and FABULOUS! what does neil think of erasure?

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 25 June 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)

OK, after relistening to Heaven Up Here, there's no way that the Bunnymen could be New Pop.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 26 June 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

Nu Shooz - "I Can't Wait"

Paul (scifisoul), Monday, 26 June 2006 02:50 (nineteen years ago)

Animotion - "Obsession"
Information Society - "What's on Your Mind? (Pure Energy)"
Missing Persons - "Words"

naus (Robert T), Monday, 26 June 2006 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

Geir would apparently argue for Grace Jones, and Kid Creole & the Coconuts:

What was the best New Pop album (80-85)?

xhuxk, Saturday, 26 May 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)

What a great thread. I learned a lot.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 26 May 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

"I Touch Roses" by Book of Love sounds like American New Pop to me.

2for25, Saturday, 26 May 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

Book of Love are the shit!!

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 26 May 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

The Romantics: Talking In Your Sleep
The Brains: Money Changes Everything
Ebn-Ozn: AEIOU Sometimes Y

kornrulez6969, Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

The Nails: 88 Lines About 44 Women

kornrulez6969, Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

I mentioned that one above!

John Eddie, "Jungle Boy" (= Springsteen doing Antmusic)

xhuxk, Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

(actually John Cafferty doing Antmusic, more like)

xhuxk, Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

Oops..I searched for "Nails" but not every answer was loaded on the page.

A good one:

The Monroes: What Do All The People Know?

kornrulez6969, Saturday, 26 May 2007 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

that's a beautiful song!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 27 May 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, that one has aged real well.

kornrulez6969, Sunday, 27 May 2007 03:56 (eighteen years ago)

Industry were Americans, weren't they? "State Of The Nation" is a great song!

Geir Hongro, Sunday, 27 May 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Lady Gaga.

xhuxk, Monday, 7 December 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

Jesus, we talked a lot in this thread.

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 7 December 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

this was great, just discovered it tks to the critic's darling thread

H in Addis, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

I'm going back there again, this is a good list, Information Society aren't bad at all, I remember not being bowled over by them back in the day. But look at their cool outfits.

http://images.artistdirect.com/Images/Sources/AMGPORTRAITS/music/portrait200/drp000/p015/p01568vsy7e.jpg

Cubby Wubby Nubby Hubby Dubby ... you know how you are (u s steel), Tuesday, 11 January 2011 23:01 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.