Low - "Drums and Guns" (album title updated)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
from pitchfork:

Just as the frost clears on the cusp of spring this coming year, it'll be time to get low with the stately winter-core of Low once again, as the Duluth trio-- now augmented with new bassist Matt Livingston-- unleashes its eighth long-player, and second for Sub Pop, tentatively titled The Violet Path.

As with its predecessor, 2005's The Great Destroyer, The Violet Path features production from studio ace and fifth Flaming Lip Dave Fridmann. While on the road with the Retribution Gospel Choir, Low's Alan Sparhawk was kind enough to share a few bits of information on the new disc with Pitchfork.

Themes of murder and death, as it happens, permeate The Violet Path. "Near as I can tell, it's all about killing," Sparhawk told Pitchfork. "I was kind of realizing the other day that a lot of the songs deal with either killing someone or dying. I don't know, it's kind of funny...maybe that's the big question. [We're] kind of living in a time when it's good to talk about killing and being killed."

Perhaps most exciting of all, the new release boasts a recording of "Murderer", one of the trio's finest songs to date-- previously only available on ultra-limited-edition vinyl.

Along with "Murderer", other homicidal numbers set to appear on The Violet Path include "Breaker", "Violent Past" ("rhymes with Violet Path," Alan was quick to point out), "Pretty People", and "Hatchet"-- the last of which is "the getting along song. It's not as violent as the title, I think."

Parental discretion notwithstanding, The Violent Path gets the seal of approval from Sparhawk and Low drummer/vocalist Mimi Parker's two young children, Hollis and George: "They like it. [Hollis] calls this record 'Mom and Dad music.'"

As mentioned, Dad's presently out touring the wilds of America with the Retribution Gospel Choir, which also includes bassist Livingston and drummer Eric Pollard. The trio put together Tour EP #2 for the occasion and wrap up this autumn jaunt with a hometown gig at Duluth, Minnesota's Pizza Lucé on November 11. They'll also hit us with some vinyl in the near future.

Low, meanwhile, have a few engagements planned for December, where you'll likely hear tunes from their Christmas album and scope some of Alan's seasonally-swank scarfs. Then after a couple months' reprieve, it's off to Europe in the new year.

gear (gear), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

Considering how much I loved the last one, I have v. high hopes...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

"Murderer", fuck yes.

Simon H. (Simon H.), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

now i'm gonna get them confused with the clientele

a.b. (alanbanana), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

i hope it's mastered better than the last one though

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

Murderer is great, yeah. I shelled out quite a bit for that 10" I think.

Hadn't heard about this (i.e. the new album) before, thanks for the heads up!

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

Mimi Parker's two young children, Hollis and George

! i wonder...

jed_ (jed), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

"Near as I can tell, it's all about killing," Sparhawk told Pitchfork.

Why do I find this line funny? Is it the dark humour? Is it because he's making casual suppositions about his own music? "Near as I can tell ...", you wrote it Alan, well what do YOU think it's about? :)

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 6 November 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Considering how much I loved the last one, I have v. high hopes...
-- Ned Raggett (ne...), November 6th, 2006.

Considering how much I loved the last seven, I do as well.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Monday, 6 November 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

Har har. I actually thought The Great Destroyer was just what the band needed to get out of a rut.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

It's in my top 5 of 2005 fo' sho'.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Monday, 6 November 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

Very much looking forward to this, although "The Great Destroyer" is a hard act to follow. Looking forward to seeing them in Februrary, too.

toby (tsg20), Monday, 6 November 2006 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

More crunchy toms yay

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 00:01 (nineteen years ago)

...in reference to Fridmann who also helped Sleater Kinney get out of a similar rut last year.

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

When I saw them early in 2006, they played a couple other new songs (titled "Sandanista" and "Dragonfly" on the setlist, which I snagged after the set) and they were both quite excellent. I do hope those made the cut...

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)

VERY excited to hear this. I loved ''The Great Destroyer,'' and I don't understand why it didn't make more 2005 Year-End Best Of Lists.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 7 November 2006 00:57 (nineteen years ago)

great destroyer was amazing! can't wait for this.

dar1a g (daria g), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 03:57 (nineteen years ago)

"dragonfly" is old, so i wouldn't put money on it being on the record (it might be, though).

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 09:37 (nineteen years ago)

very excited about this. from the live show, 'breaker' and 'sandinista' seem to be heading for that incredibly vicious wall-of-sound thing that alan got on his solo album right, did fairly well on 'on the edge of', and didnt quite get right on 'monkey'. hopefully the band and fridmann have stepped up to that.

'dragonfly' missed the cut for 'the great destroyer', so it'd be a surprise if it wasnt on this one, which is good, because its excellent, as is 'violent past'.

really looking forward to it. shame the london show came and sold out without anyone knowing about it.

mark h (mark h), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 10:31 (nineteen years ago)

I got tickets for it :-) but yeah, it didn't seem to be widely advertised.

'violent past' is my favourite of the new songs, I guess, although it's not as good as murderer.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 7 November 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

Update at http://www.chairkickers.com :

We have recently finished a new full-length recording that will likely be released in March on Sub Pop Records. We tracked and mixed it with producer Dave Fridmann. It's called Drums and Guns.

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

Thanks for that, just edited the title.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

Fridmann, by most accounts, is not/was not a Sleater-Kinney fan. I wonder if he actually likes Low? Clearly they like working with him.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

Drums And Guns? Sounds like the work of Gangsta Andy Partridge.

LC (Damian), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

i hope this is better than The Great Destroyer, Trust was such an amazingly great record but TGD was such a letdown. (though i know this isn't a widely-held opinion...)

La Monte (La Monte), Thursday, 16 November 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

i much prefer "the Violet Path" as a title but i guess it may suit the recotrd better!

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 16 November 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

i didn't like TGD much either but they couldn't, surely, have made yet another album in the same mould as their previous ones. i mean i like Low but they had made ALOT of albums by that point and they all sound very similar.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 16 November 2006 03:12 (nineteen years ago)

An album called Drums and Guns on Sub Pop? Reminded me of the AmRep singles club (early 90s) - is it short for Drums and Guns and Praying in the Streets?

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 16 November 2006 05:17 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, The Violet Path is a great title - esp. how it parallels "Violent Past" the song title

too bad they fucked up and changed it

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Thursday, 16 November 2006 07:39 (nineteen years ago)

I know it's blasphemy, but I think they're at the point where Mimi should have a bass drum.

She should only use it every few bars, but it should be there.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Thursday, 16 November 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

BAN GREY, IAN

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 16 November 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

Hey--there's a bass drum on "trust"!

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Thursday, 16 November 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

well, ok then. :-)

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 16 November 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

i should be a lot more excited by this. i guess i'm a bit low-ed out. "trust" was kinda my core moment, and i played it to death ... TGD is a good album, but i almost felt it was by a different band. i don't feel any "WOO, LOW" excitement any more; i just think, okay, this is a potentially good album to look forward to in the new year.

which is no bad thing, of course.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
This album has surpassed all my hopes/expectations. Lags a bit in the second half, but all in all a hell of a record. Simple, assured, yet seemingly quite a "risk taking" record for a band in their 12th year. I really hope it will be well recieved. Surely others are already listening--and planning to buy the album as soon as it's released.

I.M. (I.M.), Saturday, 13 January 2007 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not listening yet - but i put on "the great destroyer" yesterday and it really is slowly evolving into something great. i don't think it's a patch on "trust" - nothing is - but it's a stunning album, and it's taken me a long time to realise that.

"pissing" just gets better and better. musically, it's like a sequel to "john prine".

so yes, i'm beginning to be excited about this.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 13 January 2007 12:19 (nineteen years ago)

Word on the street is that the weird stereo mix on the leak (vocals only on the right channel - there were a couple of links to tracks on a blog on the sandbox thread) is indeed the final mix...

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 13 January 2007 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

We'll only know for sure when the retail version is available, obv.

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 13 January 2007 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

This album has grown on me since I made my sandbox comments (particularly "Dragonfly") but it still sounds like the band went out of their way to forge a different sound from their previous albums, and I think the songs suffer as a result. I guess I should wait until the Mystery of the Final Mix is solved before forming too strong an opinion.

"Violent Past" still rules, though.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

even living with this possible badly mixed version of the album i still think the same... it does seem like theyve captured woefully anaemic versions of some of their strongest material just for the sake of experimentation - "breaker" is not a jaunty song, and "sandanista" is stripped of far too much etc etc. some of the material on drums and guns works brilliantly, and also i could very much imagine tracks from trust and the great destroyer fitting onto this record in the new style theyre using much better than the way they were captured on their respective records originally.

this is, of course, a product of hearing the material on stage for a few years beforehand and falling in love with that, so is more hindsight rather than a serious fault with the record.

still makes for a bit of a disappointing listen.

mark h (mark h), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:20 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.nme.com/news/low/25762

"It sounds very different," the singer/guitarist said of the band's eighth studio album. "We're using samples in a loose way. Many of the song structures are based on a recurring, raw sound. The technique is closer to the way early hip-hop records were put together than the way we've made albums in the past.

"The best hip-hop artists take a self-effacing, yet self-aggrandising tone. They acknowledge that they're speaking to someone. Indie rock sometimes forgets that. This album feels more like I'm speaking to someone," Sparhawk said.

"We're always trying to make something unique and listen to different things," he said. "Lately we've been listening to a lot of reggae and dub, which has had an influence on this album. So has hanging out with local hip-hop bands. It's opened my eyes to new things."

Sparhawk said that the main theme of 'Drums And Guns' is "murder and the justification of it. But it's not just a bunch of murder ballads - it grapples with questions and tries to find some answers".

mark h (mark h), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:27 (nineteen years ago)

i haven't heard Low in concert ever, but i am v-VERY much in love with this record, by far my favourite Low album ever. the mix IS funny and to be honest I hope it's not final (it sounds great played on my stereo, but a little weird on headphones), but either way tracks like "Sandinista", "Hatchet", "Murderer" and "Belarus" especially sort of blow my mind with how much better they are than most Low stuff. It's not just this dread-filled treacle, or intermittent roars: there's all this stuff in the high channels, random sounds and skrees, spaces between the pitches, like things are shoving and hissing at you from different levels.

And melodically: gorgeous.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

And it's funny because I hear almost zero hip-hop or dub, but a lot of influence from Akron/Family and that wing of experimental indie-folk stuff. (Maybe even Broken Social Scene?)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

I love the mix, the hard pans, the ghosts in the machine. Definitely a moxy move to give sounds that aren't the vocals space to breathe. I've never heard any of this stuff live, but I can't imagine I'd prefer a more straight-ahead low-rock version of any of it.

I.M. (I.M.), Saturday, 13 January 2007 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

saw first ave has a cd release party in the main room for low. i'm totes stoked.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Saturday, 13 January 2007 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

The more they experiment with their sound, the clearer it becomes, IMO: the main and only element that makes Low Low isn't the slowness or the instrumentation or the silence, no, it's those incredible Alan/Mimi harmonies.

StanM (StanM), Saturday, 13 January 2007 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

totally OTM.

if this is the final mix, it'll be a bit annoying for headphone listening, and i'm not really sure there's anything gained from it. but it's not a huge issue.

toby (tsg20), Saturday, 13 January 2007 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

this mix sure sounds messy, tyoo crowded in places. i hope they get it straightened out cos it's bound to be great, if a grower

rizzx (Rizz), Saturday, 13 January 2007 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

I`m feeling a little lukewarm on this one, after loving the last...well, all of them. It has a few tracks that stand with their best but it also has a couple`(Sandinista, and especially Hatchet) that are definitely their worst, along with annoying things here and there, like the out-of-place Sean O`Hagan esque strings on Belarus. I love Dust on the Window, Murderer, Your Poison and Violent Past though.

Simon H. (Simon H.), Saturday, 13 January 2007 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

I have a promo copy with full artwork (and just a punched barcode) -- this is definitely going to be the final mix.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:43 (nineteen years ago)

This is also the band's best album since Things We Lost in the Fire and -- along with I Could Live in Hope and that one -- probably one of my top three Low albums.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:46 (nineteen years ago)

OTM.

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

it's really good but seriously, the vocals are that separated?

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:53 (nineteen years ago)

Everyone will be writing about it, more people will want to hear it = marketing masterstroke?

StanM (StanM), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

I can imagine that it might be slightly annoying on headphones, but like the great majority of listeners, I'm not much of a headphones guy except on the iPod from time to time -- and aside from the vocals, the production and mastering in general are very well done and sound fantastic on any number of stereo set ups on which I've played the album.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Thursday, 25 January 2007 01:20 (nineteen years ago)

I dig it with headphones--why would it be annoying that way? I guess I tend to be a fan of very wide-angle soundstaging, and it works for the sound of these songs to place vocals far right.

I.M. (I.M.), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 06:08 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, it reminds me of Stevie Wonder's "Look Around," a track I always dug for its unusual use of stereo.

I.M. (I.M.), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 06:11 (nineteen years ago)

sparhawk sounds like the guy from the ex on the first track.

held tony (held tony), Thursday, 1 February 2007 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
I was really surprised at hearing how much they retained from the production of the songs live. And also that they seem to have gone back to being quiet again, for the most part.

toby, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think I ever heard The Great Destroyer. Initially I loved the tracks from this one, but I found myself waning towards the end. There are definitely some songs on it that stand up with their best, though.

emil.y, Thursday, 22 February 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
I've been playing this all week-end. What an amazing album. I hadn't gear a Low album since 'Curtain' and had kinda assumed that they had been putting out the same album ever since, but I definitely stand corrected.

baaderonixx, Sunday, 18 March 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

I'm patiently waiting on formal release for this one. I fully expect to it to be awesomer than awesome. If you like.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 18 March 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

'Hatchet' reminds me of a funked-up 'Bela Lugosi is dead'.

baaderonixx, Sunday, 18 March 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

Just listened to this for the first time walking around downtown, on headphones naturally, and the hard panning without change over the entire album bugged the shit out of me. I probably won't be listening to it much on the ol' iPod, and since that's the only way I've been listening to music lately, this one won't be growing on me for a while (if ever).

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 19 March 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)

What's the big? This is hardly the first time they've gone all hard-pan.

i, grey, Monday, 19 March 2007 05:13 (eighteen years ago)

I'm enjoying this album. Got "Belarus" stuck in my head.

Drooone, Monday, 19 March 2007 05:16 (eighteen years ago)

this is a pretty great record. it reminds me of young marble giants.

theoreticalgirl, Monday, 19 March 2007 23:54 (eighteen years ago)

! Theoreticalgirl has instantly assured me of this album's brilliance.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 March 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

the videoclip for Breaker:

http://www.chairkickers.com/video/Low_Breaker.mov

StanM, Sunday, 1 April 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)

where else did they hard pan like this?

it still bugs me but to a lesser extent now that I'm really familiar with the album. this might be the ONLY Low album where I really love every song. and there is now denying how wonderful this version of murderer is; best track they've done ever, even beating Sleep at the Bottom, for me.

akm, Sunday, 1 April 2007 14:04 (eighteen years ago)

The video for Breaker is terrific - manages to be very funny and somehow quite sad. I especially like it when Alan reaches under the counter for his "reserve" milk.

The album is undeniably brilliant, and the hard pan is something I've got used to but still don't much like. It sounds fine on speakers, and there are some instances where the extra space in the production works very well - but it's way overused over the course of the whole thing. So much of Low's magic is in the voices, and when they are hard-right in headphones most of the time it gets a bit wearing.

A technically minded pal of mine has claimed he is going to "fix" this and remaster it himself...will report back on how this goes.

Bill A, Sunday, 1 April 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)

i'm just listening to this now, for the first time. it reminds me of hood, in parts. this is a good thing. nothing's totally grabbed me yet, though. i think low and i have (as i might have said upthread) grown apart a bit. but i'm fascinated and intrigued, and ... hey, the end of sandinista is very good, isn't it? ... yeh, i can imagine i'll come back to this a lot.

can't imagine what it'll sound like on headphones and am a bit too hungover to bother finding out right now.

grimly fiendish, Sunday, 1 April 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

bloody hell, "murderer" ...

grimly fiendish, Sunday, 1 April 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

I heard this in the CD shop a few weeks ago and bought it just based on what I heard as I shopped. I can't claim to be a very big Low fan...I only bought like two of their CD's in my whole life and kept only one of them. But this thing just seems to fit the times...or my mood...or something.

Bimble, Saturday, 14 April 2007 04:18 (eighteen years ago)

Um...Murderer, yeah...that's bang on, Grimly. Sorry it took me 12 days to catch up with you.

Bimble, Saturday, 14 April 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

they're lucky that this is quite possibly the best album they've ever done, songwriting wise, that it balances out the dumb mix trick

akm, Saturday, 14 April 2007 06:06 (eighteen years ago)

I saw them last night at the Metro and they were pretty good. It was my first time seeing them. How does this version of Low (sans Zak Sally) compare with Low Mk. I?

Z S, Saturday, 14 April 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

murderer is so great! this is one of those albums that have a few brief moments of transcendent, inexplicable, heartbreaking beauty. murderer has one of my favorites: "i've seen you pound your fist into the earth."

modestmickey, Saturday, 14 April 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)

okay, so this morning i started listening to this on headphones and it suddenly became perfect: intense, frightened, wonderfully different. really quite thrillingly good.

i've never heard any of sparhawk's side projects, but i imagine the OMD-influenced one is feeding into this quite a lot.

revelatory, this. best thing they've done in yonks. wonderful.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 14:01 (eighteen years ago)

I really wish the vocals to "Breaker" were not just in my right ear only.

...That's not just me, right?

Ben Boyerrr, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)

I like the original version of Murderer better...

Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

That's not just me, right?

well, it's certainly not me. i really like it. reminds me of bongwater, or something. i mean, a song like "breaker" has very few elements to it, and that weird mix is one of the key things that makes it different/special/freaky/wonderful.

I like the original version of Murderer better

original as in ... where?

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

The Murderer EP (2003)

http://onlyangels.free.fr/reviews/l/low/murderer.htm

StanM, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

Better version of 'Silver Rider' on there as well.

aldo, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)

i seem to have missed that completely. hmm. thanks.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

That's not just me, right?

well, it's certainly not me.


I actually didn't mean the opinion! I was asking if the "vocals in one ear" thing was a result of my own cheap speakers/set up, or if it was mixed that way!

Ben Boyerrr, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

it is mixed that way. it is annoying.

akm, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

this is incredible on headphones. esp. 'murderer', 'belarus', 'violent past', 'breaker'.

derrrick, Thursday, 19 April 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)

still like this a lot. still prefer original version of 'murderer'.

toby, Thursday, 19 April 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

hmm. i've now heard the original "murderer" (thank you, stan: i owe you) and i have to say i don't think it touches the version on D&G. it lacks the tautness; the menace.

this here EP version of "silver rider" is much better, mind.

i spent yesterday cursing a rota fuck-up at work that means i have to work on friday; however, i've just realised it means i don't have to work thursday evening, so i can go to the low gig in glasgow after all. hurrah. i'm very interested in how they're going to replicate the new stuff live.

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:40 (eighteen years ago)

I'll have to check out the EP "Silver Rider" on that basis, sounds first rate.

Am off to see them in Manchester on Friday, looking forward very much - last time I saw them (last year) they were pretty much the best I've ever seen them and I'm hoping they bring some of the same intensity and focus on this tour - obviously they were flawless vocally, but Alan was bristling with tics and nervy energy. I remember them playing Sandinista and Murderer (and probably a few more off D&G) but in a more straightforward guitar-y manner.

Maybe they'll be getting the soundman to mix all the vocals into the right-hand speaker stack...

Bill A, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)

Grimly OTM. Silver Rider original is superb; the version on the Great Destroyer lacks the ambience. Its just too produced.

The Drums and Guns version of Murderer, OTOH, is stunning. The original is good but the menace is palpable on the new version. The tension is extraordinary - it's up with their finest work.

Guilty_Boksen, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)

I saw this band lastnight, having not heard the new stuff at all. I didn't notice this left-right mixing" issue live so either it's not as drastic or they don't reproduce it. A good show, though I regret not screaming "California" louder and more than once when he asked for requests. New songs seem really short, and even more "minimalist" than previous stuff.

riche, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

The night we saw them in London a couple of months ago was probably the best I've ever seen them (better than last year in Grand Rapids, even, which was one of the best things I've ever seen), so I'm looking forward to seeing them again next week. Shepherd's Bush Empire does seem a little large, though.

toby, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

saw them in glasgow last night. that's somewhere between seven and 10 times i've seen them now; i've lost count. it was packed, which made my heart happy.

and they were staggering. perhaps the best i've ever seen them. new bassist dude (matt, is it?) is fucking awesome; he was terrified (even to the extent of taking his specs off, presumably so he couldn't see the crowd) but my god, he's a powerful player. they've repositioned themselves live so mimi is now stage-right, further to the front, and bassist (who is the absolute spit of tim robbins in "jacob's ladder") is in the centre, to the rear.

they played "the plan". i, er, got something in my eye.

they did a lot from "drums and guns"; only "belarus" was in any way part of the nu-low dynamic (they did it over a simple loop of mimi's voice). everything else was re-done, as bill A suggests above, in the traditional low style, which just makes me love them even more: the fact they're performing completely different versions of these songs live, and obviously just did the album that way because ... well, why not? it's not like there's a quantifiable comparison to be made: there's no "better" or "worse" between the live and album versions. just "different". which is, er, "wonderful".

that said, "take your time" took on a howling new dynamic that was something else altogether ...

they played "pissing", and it was like sheet steel. they played "canada" and i remembered how much i loved "trust" and how i really must listen again.

oh, and there was a FITE. seriously: some little chap getting pissed off with a big lad standing in his line of vision. sparhawk v funny about the whole thing ("and we'll say there was a fight when we played scotland" ... pause ... "and they'll ask where in scotland" ... mother of all pauses ... "and we'll say 'glasgow'" ... beat ... "and they'll say 'glasgow?' really?"); he also played two songs dedicated to the pugilists, one being "lust" ("are you filled with anger ...") and the other, annoyingly, being one i can't remember.

so yes, anyway. last night i fell in love with this band all over again. although D&G had gone a long, long way to restoring my faith. i guess i was more disappointed by "the great destroyer" than i realised; i mean, i still like it, but it just doesn't register as a TRULY GREAT LOW ALBUM up there with, say, "trust" or "curtain". whereas D&G most certainly does.

also: i bought the alan sparhawk album after the show. it's fucking wonderful, isn't it? low meets test department in bruce gilbert's shed.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 27 April 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)

So you liked the show, then.

(Need to finally listen to this, I've had it for a few weeks even.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 27 April 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

yeh, it was okay.

:)

grimly fiendish, Friday, 27 April 2007 23:06 (eighteen years ago)

so, is this a band I should check out then?

byebyepride, Friday, 27 April 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

yeh. you should recommend them to some mate of yours, too. perhaps a dashingly handsome one with big eyebrows.

grimly fiendish, Friday, 27 April 2007 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

This album was the first thing I played when I got home this evening, just chosen pretty much at random. I didn't know I would come here and find that Grimly had seen them live! Gasp. I actually did see them once myself, opening for Nick Cave, end of '98. They were quite good and really changed my preconceived notions. That was before I owned any of their CD's. I also saw Sparhawk live together with Kozelek of Red House Painters a few years back, as well, but he really was in Kozelek's shadow that night, though I hope they are still good friends.

Bimble, Saturday, 28 April 2007 02:07 (eighteen years ago)

Excellent post grimly! ;)

The two Low CD's I had before this were "Secret Name" and "I Could Live In Hope". I liked one song on Secret Name a lot, which is why I bought it but I sold it pretty quickly. ICLIH was something I liked much, much, more and very Joy Divisiony, I think. I'm ashamed that I sold that as well. I claim the insanity clause, please don't kill me, I'll get it again.

Heheh...looking through their discog now, I remember when Long Division came out I was really sneery and distrustful of it. That really makes me laugh now.

I remember a guy really recommending "Things We Lost In The Fire" really highly to me, though, around the year 2000-2002. I wanted to check it out but never did.

And that is my life story with Low. Not that anyone cares.

Bimble, Saturday, 28 April 2007 02:15 (eighteen years ago)

Now playing Murderer at full volume...it's really the kind of song you want to play 50 or 60 times in a row, isn't it?

Bimble, Saturday, 28 April 2007 03:41 (eighteen years ago)

ARRRRGH! THEY're COMIN to Seattle in JUNE! And at first I thought it was May and I was like "oh no I won't be in town" and then...JUNE!!!! YES!!!!!And at the Triple Door, too! What an odd venue. I've never actually been before but a friend told me what to expect.

Bimble, Saturday, 28 April 2007 03:57 (eighteen years ago)

x-post to grimly - great write-up.

I saw them last night in Manchester and Alan told us all about the boot-off in Glasgow! He suggested that if Manchester was to maintain its scrapping reputation we'd have to start throwing punches too...

And what a fucking show - sold out, as they usually do here although was in the Uni's smaller room. They seemed in a happier frame of mind than last time they played and I felt that Matt had settled in now, although agree that he looked like he was shitting it. Alan and Mimi were in stupendously good voice throughout and they played so beautifully that I felt stupidly emotional at times.

Particular highlights were (as mentioned upthread) The Plan and Murderer, also they did a blazing version of Breaker, very different to the album cut. Personal highlight was probably Amazing Grace, but honestly the whole show was fantastic.

Unearthed this little treat for fans yesterday too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhJAR6UZsCk

Bill A, Saturday, 28 April 2007 12:03 (eighteen years ago)

great clip. I listened to Things We Lost... for a month fairly straight before this came out and I thought it would be a horrible transition for me, wanting to hear more old-school analouge Low, but it was actually very awesome as previously stated. Violent Past was my jam first listen but you're right Murderer is insane too. And Dragonfly. And Your Poison. When I play the album at work the overhead speakers are, for reasons entirely baffling to me, wired L and R so as you walk around you only hear the vocals in some spots, the bulk of the instrumentation in some spots, and mix of both in some spots. Tonight, me and one of my friends are going to try and play it through his soundsystem at home and bounce the hard pan side off something in an attempt to get a natural mix closer to the center (1. His idea 2. we're drunk). (Still want to hear Bill A's report on the refurbished stereo mix.) The closest they play to me is at Tremont Hall (Bleh!) in Charlotte (BLEH!) with Wilco (eh) so I'm probably not going to see them. I gots the Low fever.

earinfections, Saturday, 28 April 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

This is making me want to hunt down some Low stuff, I love the little bit I've listened to on last.fm such as "Monkey".

Trayce, Sunday, 29 April 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

I recommend "Murderer".

Bimble, Sunday, 29 April 2007 03:13 (eighteen years ago)

has anyone tried listening to this through a surround system and forcing a center channel mix or something?

akm, Sunday, 29 April 2007 05:17 (eighteen years ago)

"murderer" is rapidly heading towards a coveted place in the pantheon of all-time grimly greats. it's almost terrifyingly good.

watching that stunning link bill posted was the first time the significance of the second line hit me: ie who the "you" is. which (even as a devout atheist) just makes me love this even more.

i forget about their religion; when i remember, i want to go and listen to every single song again and recontextualise them.

good excuse to go do that, heh.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 30 April 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)

They were astoundingly good in Nottingham, save a creaky Belarus, but their set at ATP was just...perfect.

Mister Craig, Monday, 30 April 2007 23:15 (eighteen years ago)

okay, i've listened to "murderer" something like four times today. hellfire. it is sonically perfect. and gets better with every listen, somehow.

i still can't see how anyone would vouch for the (still brilliant) EP version over the (fucking blinding) album one, but hey.

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)

probably having a couple of years to fall in love with the EP version first helped its cause, I guess!

toby, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

Alan Sparhawk doing 'Murderer' solo acoustic somewhere in Paris in February.

Mister Craig, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 06:17 (eighteen years ago)

This is great. This thread, I mean, and all these clips. Keep 'em coming... plus, any live reviews, impressions, etc. I'm more and more convinced that Low are the greatest band of the last ten or twelve years in terms of consistency and sheer fucking palatial-domestic beauty. Yes. It's all about the tension. I may be drowning in Cabernet/Shiraz/Merlot right now, but that's true nonetheless.

Anyway, If we were to have a bona fide intergalactic Battle Of The Bands, Low should represent our dear Earth, I think.

Lostandfound, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)

i'm perfectly sober and i think i agree.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 09:56 (eighteen years ago)

I read a critical review of Drums & Guns on CokeMachineGlow and I thought it made a few good points. I'm intrigued to see how the album stands up by the end of the year. Right now I can't believe I've never fallen for them before.

Mister Craig, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)

there might be a couple of good points in there. sadly, the writing is so dreary i genuinely couldn't be arsed wading through it all. 1300 words, and all of them equally dull. 1300 words! one-thousand-three-hundred! shoot me now.

the only thing that caught my eye was the fact the writer managed to get the quote from "murderer" wrong, which is pretty much unforgivable given the lyrics to all their songs are on the band's bloody website.

nb: this is not me being some partisan prick about the album - which i admit is flawed, despite the fact i love it. it's simply a copy editor's anguished sigh :(

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 2 May 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

I'm intrigued to see how the album stands up by the end of the year. Right now I can't believe I've never fallen for them before.


For what it's worth (not much, I admit), I think Drums & Guns will hold up very well. I'm not sure it's flawed as much as that it isn't for everyone, but Low nails the aesthetic they're going for so well that I think those that do get it will rate it highly in year-end polls.

If we were to have a bona fide intergalactic Battle Of The Bands, Low should represent our dear Earth, I think.


OTM, mostly because of their intensity. Thousands of bands are louder, but few of them -- if any -- can match the power in songs like Murderer or Breaker.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 2 May 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)

Three Star review of the Glasgow show in The Guardian today:

http://music.guardian.co.uk/live/story/0,,2071247,00.html

Not especially illuminating, and the reviewer also manages to get the lyrics to Dragonfly wrong. I'm no copy editor but I'll echo grimly's sighs on this, it torpedoes the credibility of the critic in my opinion.

Returning to the Wonder Of Low, that "busking" footage of Alan that Mister Craig linked to upthread is brilliant. The pipes on him are just phenomenal.

Bill A, Thursday, 3 May 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)

For what it's worth (not much, I admit), I think Drums & Guns will hold up very well. I'm not sure it's flawed as much as that it isn't for everyone, but Low nails the aesthetic they're going for so well that I think those that do get it will rate it highly in year-end polls.

yeah, it's a grower (as most if not all Low albums are) but an excellent progression for them

stephen, Thursday, 3 May 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)

...and an album that will easily make my top ten year-end list, fwiw

stephen, Thursday, 3 May 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)

hang on, what the FUCK is that guardian review on about? they didn't play the ABC, they played oran mor. a week ago.

that's worse than the bloody cokemachineglow thing, that. it's not a review, just a guy moping about swirls and beats.

i'd love to say "WAS THE REVIEWER EVEN AT THE SAME SHOW AS ME?" but on that evidence i don't think he actually knows.

something, somewhere at the guardian, has gone very wrong.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

meanwhile: i echo both stephen's posts there.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

Glad to see Low getting some positive attention from those who normally wouldn't have given them a listen. The record is far from perfect, but few groups in the pop/rock idiom are still trying new approaches fourteen years on (and succeeding as Low mostly is doing).

Soundslike, Saturday, 5 May 2007 00:58 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

Listening to Drums & Guns a lot. Pretty People doesn't do much for me (at least it's the opening track so easy to skip) but the sequence running Belarus - Breaker - Dragonfly - Sandinista - Always Fade is brillant. They've got a healthy undercurrent of the menacing, machinery sounds Eno used in some of his Another Green World tracks. I'm sure there more recent reference points but that's what I hear. Anyway, it works really well with the otherworldly vocals.

"Maybe you're right"

that's not my post, Monday, 30 July 2007 06:10 (eighteen years ago)

Something went wrong and they didn't come to the venue here they were supposed to. I don't think they came here at all.

Bimble, Monday, 30 July 2007 06:12 (eighteen years ago)

We saw them play a free show in a pizza place in Duluth last week. They were pretty great - didn't play all that much from Drums and Guns though, I think just Dragonfly/Belarus/Murderer/Violent Past.

toby, Monday, 30 July 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)

vvv nice session tracks here:

http://www.daytrotter.com/article/910/free-songs-low

StanM, Thursday, 2 August 2007 11:33 (eighteen years ago)

blazingly good stuff there, especially Sandinista - thanks for the heads up StanM!

Bill A, Thursday, 2 August 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

thanks Stan, those are fantastic.

toby, Friday, 3 August 2007 02:54 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, those are amazing, "Sandinista", sure, but "Violent Past" even more so.

Lostandfound, Friday, 3 August 2007 08:29 (eighteen years ago)

http://scheduletwo.com/video/low

Live videos of Low from scheduletwo.com Filmed at the Drums & Guns record release show in Minneapolis.

Includes:

Dragonfly
Point of Disgust
Pissing
Murderer
Last Snowstorm of the Year
Dinosaur Act

onimo, Friday, 3 August 2007 11:58 (eighteen years ago)

ooooooh, thanks!

StanM, Friday, 3 August 2007 12:04 (eighteen years ago)

They really are unable to suck live, aren't they?

StanM, Friday, 3 August 2007 12:15 (eighteen years ago)

I heard they were pretty shit in Dublin. Although that may have just been to make me feel better about not being able to go.

I know, right?, Friday, 3 August 2007 13:46 (eighteen years ago)

they've never been less than fantastic when i've seen them, i have to say (including 5 times in 06-07, i guess).

toby, Friday, 3 August 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

Finally getting around to a listen here. (Yeah yeah, I know.) I'm surprised people aren't talking about "Hatchet" more -- is it the most unstereotypical Low song ever? Sure feels like it!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

Hatchet is my 2d favorite song on the disc (just behind Murderer). It's like a surprisingly loose update of Bela Lagosi's Dead.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

This album is more or less dead to me now with the exception of "Violent Past", and occasionally "Murderer".

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

I still wish "Breaker" was in both my headphones :(

Ben Boyerrr, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)

I still wish "Breaker" was in both my headphones :(

I used to feel the same way, but I've come around. I like the way the vocal slice-in from one side of your head.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 September 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)

I hate "Hatchet" so much that I deleted it from the directory. I can't handle the baby boomer vibe to it, if that makes any sense.

I like Belarus, Always Fade, Murderer still, but this album did get tired fast.

rockapads, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

tired fast??

PFFT

ALBUM OF THE YEAR (for me, probably)

stephen, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

I can see someone saying that. It's a bleak, relentless disc (except for Hatchet, actually), which for some people won't invite repeat listens. But, hey, it's the band's muse, and it's a really artful, compelling, intense album. I respect the fact that Low seems to care about the integrity of their work, not just its commercial prospects. They released what I thought was their most commercial work ever in 2005, but instead of continuing down that path with their follow-up, they release Drums and Guns, which doesn't at all seem designed to get radio play or mainstream acceptance.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 September 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

Sorry, first sentence should read "I can see someone saying that Drums and Guns got tired fast."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 September 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

last time i listened, i loved it; haven't done so in a while. i'm doing a lot of travelling about right now ... i'll try to cue it up tomorrow.

grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

Funny, I just listened to this a couple of days ago after sort of forgetting about it for a while. Something I noticed (which echoes Daniel, Esq's point re: integrity) is how -- unlike so many full-lengths these days -- Drums And Guns isn't at all front-loaded. It finishes incredibly strongly, with two of its best songs ("Murderer" and "Violent Past") rounding out the album sublimely. The overall sequencing is quite exceptional, in fact, with a three-song swell early on ("Belarus", "Breaker", "Dragonfly") a relative lightening of mood and (arguably) quality ("Hatchet"*) before the sublime finish I already mentioned.

*I think I'm undecided on this song, but I do wish they'd replaced the album version with this one.

Lostandfound, Thursday, 20 September 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

Weird, I don't even like the word "sublime" and yet I used it twice just then.

Lostandfound, Thursday, 20 September 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Transcendent gig in Austin TX last night, highlights too many to count. Setlist in rough order:

In the Flesh? (Pink Floyd cover)
Cue the Strings
Sandanista
In Silence
Take Your Time
Dragonfly
July
Hatchet
Pissing
Point of Disgust
Belarus
Violent Past
Silver Rider
Murderer
Breaker
------
In the Drugs
Over the Ocean
When I Go Deaf

stephen, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

* Sandinista

stephen, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

gah i wish they'd done 'over the ocean' in SF last week. it was an excellent show though, better than the last two times i'd seen them. liked the organ stuff that the bass player played.

akm, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

Point of Disgust

!!!!!

damn, i would love to hear them do that one live. how did they do it: with a piano/keyboard, or re-cast for guitar?

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

Matt Livingston on some sort of keyboard (not facing the audience, so couldn't tell what sort) and Mimi on vocals, and Alan harmonizing as the song built up. incredible.

stephen, Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

wow.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

Is it common for Low to start shows with a 20+ minute version of 'Do You Know How to Waltz"? First time to see them live, despite having been into most of their music since 1996 or so. They seemed to be playing awfully angrily--which was impressive, just not exactly what I'd imagined.

Soundslike, Saturday, 6 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

No, it isn't :-( They've played it a few times this year, but not at any of the shows I've been to. I'd love to see them play it...

toby, Sunday, 7 October 2007 05:37 (eighteen years ago)

I've still got it in my CD pile, right here.

Bimble, Sunday, 7 October 2007 05:56 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

From way upthread:

Unearthed this little treat for fans yesterday too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhJAR6UZsCk

Which I only am now watching/listening to. ARGH SO GOOD. Thank you.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 12 December 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)

two months pass...

this is the low album for me, so good.

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

I still haven't heard this one, not sure why.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, i just got around to it today.

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:33 (eighteen years ago)

Best album of 2007.

stephen, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

One of, yes. And sadly underappreciated in Year End polls.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

maybe this one can do it some justice....i i had it at number 6 for the year...im pretty sure...5 or 6

gman, Thursday, 28 February 2008 06:31 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think this is a bad album, but coming after trust and destroyer, both of which i adore, it was a bit of an unpleasant surprise. it certainly stands on its own, but expectations are always the kicker.

having said that, it's probably #5 of all their records for me, the other two being long division and curtain. to this day i find it hard to get so interested in the period from dead pilot to lost in the fire, even though i like all the singles..

electricsound, Thursday, 28 February 2008 06:37 (seventeen years ago)

Has anyone heard that Gospel Retribution Band thing that Alan Parker does? Apparently the new album has a re-done version of "Breaker" on it (which I love, but I hate that one-side-of-the-stereo-vocals thing with a mad passion).

Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 28 February 2008 11:18 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, that Breaker version is online here: http://www.caldoverderecords.com/

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 11:23 (seventeen years ago)

still cant completely get behind this record. the ditching of the 'low sound' and experimentation is very welcome and an interesting way forward. but i still think that some of the material suffered a lot by being on this record.

its good that 'belarus', 'murderer' + 'dragonfly' were left off their respective records and recorded definitively for this lp, but tracks like 'breaker' and 'sandanista' were definitely denied the gravity and 'low sound' that they really deserved to do them justice.

the RGC version of breaker is getting there, but still missing something from the sheets of sensory overload that low delivered live.

a good live EP/LP would go a way to fixing this.

matt h, Saturday, 1 March 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

Great 54 minute documentary (with Dutch subtitles), on Dutch VPRO TV a couple of weekends ago:

http://sites.nps.nl/jerome/templates/uurvandewolf/welcome.html
(click "LOW: bekijk de uitzending")

StanM, Monday, 7 April 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

Guys, I apologize for bumping this again, but this documentary is really really really recommended. I know it's long and subtitled, but check it out anyway.

StanM, Friday, 11 April 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)

it is really good, certainly a good companion to 'low in europe' and the one on the boxset dvd. its nice that alan seems relatively okay these days.

LaMonte, Friday, 11 April 2008 21:11 (seventeen years ago)

ooh nice! i'll be watching this soon.

stephen, Friday, 11 April 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)

excellent documentary, many thanks for the pointer.

that's not my post, Saturday, 12 April 2008 05:10 (seventeen years ago)

Just discovered it's out on DVD too, by the way.

StanM, Saturday, 12 April 2008 21:53 (seventeen years ago)

ten months pass...

This album is fucking STUNNING on headphones.

ilxor, Monday, 23 February 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

^^^^ This. Low is still very underrated. They should get some attention in those forthcoming "Best of the Decade" lists focusing on indie-rock albums.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 23 February 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

(i.e., those of the forthcoming "Best of Decade" lists that focus on indie-rock).

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 23 February 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)

Key word, "should," unfortunately. xpost

ilxor, Monday, 23 February 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

is Low underrated? They're much bigger these days than I ever expected them to be. They opened for RAdiohead in NYC!

akm, Monday, 23 February 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

four years pass...

So, I know it's sacrilege, but I stopped listening to Low after TGD because I despised the rockiness of that record. Now I'm listening to D&G for the first time, on headphones, and I am SO ANGRY at myself for abandoning this band for a few years.

hilarious topless cookie chef (the table is the table), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 19:55 (twelve years ago)

D&G is still one of my favorites (like out of anything ever).

and listening to the new one made me realize how great C'mon is too.

precious bonsai children of new york (Jordan), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 19:57 (twelve years ago)

i saw them a couple of days ago in front of a retty small audience - i was about 3 meters from allan - in frankfurt. the concert was so and so. the new record does not touch me like c'mon did. but actually the main problem wasn't even the new album. they didn't play a lot of it. somehow there wasn't this awesome spiritual almost holy atmosphere this time. it was just a normal rock concert. i bought d&g at the end and i was really disappointed by that album. lots of superfluous songs like belarus and sandinista. i am really angry with myself. after all these years i still listen to critics praising records before listening to them myself. after 50 bloody years!

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:41 (twelve years ago)

pretty, alan

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:42 (twelve years ago)

lots of superfluous songs like belarus and sandinista

!

precious bonsai children of new york (Jordan), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:47 (twelve years ago)

what does rockiness mean in relation to the great destroyer, cookie chef? just listening to silver rider, def. one of their ultimate songs.

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Tuesday, 21 May 2013 20:47 (twelve years ago)

AIM, rockiness because, compared to Trust (which is, imo, their must consistently underrated album) and TWLITF, there is much more distorted guitar and traditional "rock" song structure. comparing "(that's how you sing) amazing grace" to "silver rider" is difficult for me, because while i like both, i appreciate the former so much more than the latter because it inhabits a sound that is a bit more unique. i first got into Low because of the comparative sparseness of their sound, and with TGD, that sparseness was put to the way side in terms of production. anyway, maybe that's just me, but i just find the production of much of TGD to be too full, too "un"-Low for me, even when i'm comparing it to D&G and the new one.

hilarious topless cookie chef (the table is the table), Wednesday, 22 May 2013 18:36 (twelve years ago)

oddly enough Trust, TGD and Drums & Guns are my three favorite Low albums

da croupier, Wednesday, 22 May 2013 18:40 (twelve years ago)

five years pass...

so, Drums And Guns walked so Double Negative (and arguably Ones and Sixes) could run, right?

austinb, Friday, 5 October 2018 03:43 (seven years ago)

really enjoying all the low-went-weird praise when this was clearly the first marker. "murderer" into "violent past" is all time.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Friday, 5 October 2018 04:47 (seven years ago)

oddly enough Trust, TGD and Drums & Guns are my three favorite Low albums

― da croupier, Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:40 AM (five years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm

princess of hell (BradNelson), Friday, 5 October 2018 10:59 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.