I am a fan. Bros= great. It is much more Beach Boys/ acid on a beach freakout than I expected, which is really sweet.
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:16 (eighteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:17 (eighteen years ago)
― jimn (jimnaseum), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:18 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:19 (eighteen years ago)
― jimn (jimnaseum), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:21 (eighteen years ago)
torrents makes my computer cry.
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:22 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)
― lucas pine (Ignatius), Friday, 26 January 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 26 January 2007 03:28 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Friday, 26 January 2007 03:58 (eighteen years ago)
― joygoat (joygoat), Friday, 26 January 2007 08:39 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
― brokenfuses (brokenfuses), Saturday, 27 January 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 27 January 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Wrinklecause for Applause! (Wrinklepaws), Saturday, 27 January 2007 03:22 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Saturday, 27 January 2007 04:51 (eighteen years ago)
― brettino's bounce (Da ve Segal), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)
I love me.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 27 January 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Monday, 29 January 2007 03:25 (eighteen years ago)
― beaux knee (boney), Monday, 29 January 2007 14:09 (eighteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Monday, 29 January 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)
― beaux knee (boney), Monday, 29 January 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)
― acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Monday, 29 January 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:10 (eighteen years ago)
― M. V. (M.V.), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:38 (eighteen years ago)
― M. V. (M.V.), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:40 (eighteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:42 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:47 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:49 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 04:50 (eighteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 05:05 (eighteen years ago)
― Z S (Zach S), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 05:33 (eighteen years ago)
this gets it right on the head, after a bit longer listening to it. i'm not/comfy.. is great still, but those songs were way early last year on constant repeat for a few days straight. search for delicious and bros are totally fucking awesome. bros is like one constant explosion of muddy crystal if you ask me.
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 06:30 (eighteen years ago)
― jeffrey / secret eye (jeffrey secret eye), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 06:41 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 06:44 (eighteen years ago)
― rizzx (Rizz), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 10:13 (eighteen years ago)
― sleeve (sleeve), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
― the kwisatz bacharach (sanskrit), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
I'm Not/Comfy In Nautica was the single.
Bros is the 12"
and Good Girl/Carrot was on the split with Excepter?
I hope this is released on vinyl, I think I like it more than Feels (which I liked a lot). It's spacier and more abstract.
― sleeve (sleeve), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
― cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)
also, young prayer has...well, a lot more invention.
― mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)
also, i think this wins over avey's solo stuff, but i always like the bear over the tare.
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 8 February 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)
― sleeve (sleeve), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Is the Place (Space Is the Place), Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:08 (eighteen years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Saturday, 10 February 2007 06:21 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table (treesessplode), Saturday, 10 February 2007 06:25 (eighteen years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Saturday, 10 February 2007 06:36 (eighteen years ago)
― M.V., Tuesday, 13 March 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 13 March 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)
― sleeve, Tuesday, 13 March 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)
― poortheatre, Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
― modestmickey, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Sum Fitch, Thursday, 22 March 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)
― tornup_andhurt, Thursday, 22 March 2007 21:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Hurting 2, Friday, 23 March 2007 02:57 (eighteen years ago)
― resolved, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)
Im not trying to say Person Pitch is devastatingly original, rather that Panda Bear has done what so many other fail to do; take an encyclopaedic musical knowledge and translate that into genuinely great fresh compositions. This sentiment is even echoed right down to the albums packaging which instead of giving you the usual bland liner notes/lyrics/praise be to the creator crap shows you a giant list of influences ranging from minimal techno to dub, to hip hop, to kraut-rock and beyond and you know, if you listen carefully you can hear it all. The first thing that comes up when people begin chattering about Lennoxs productions is Brian Wilson, and thats an apt comparison at surface level, but listen a little closer and youll hear Kraftwerk, Autechre, John Lennon, Lee Perry, Stockhausen, Timbaland, Konono No.1, Arvo Part and so much more.
― fandango, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
― fandango, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
― 69, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)
― fandango, Monday, 26 March 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)
― rio natsume, Monday, 26 March 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Milton Parker, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Milton Parker, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Milton Parker, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
― rio natsume, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)
― jergïns, Monday, 2 April 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
― fandango, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Reatards Unite, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)
― mcddcm, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
― leavethecapital, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)
― dmr, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Pye Poudre, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)
― M.V., Wednesday, 4 April 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
― rio natsume, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 22:31 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
― rio natsume, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Thursday, 5 April 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
i'm surprised nobody has drawn the obvious di comparisons yet
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 5 April 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 5 April 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Capitaine Jay Vee, Thursday, 12 April 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
I like this live download thing more than Person Pitch. More beats!
― mizzell, Thursday, 7 June 2007 01:37 (eighteen years ago)
what live download thing? (this is my album of the year so far btw)
― braveclub, Thursday, 7 June 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
Paw Tracks is selling a live show from 2004 on itunes. it's got a couple of the songs from PP and two other ones. It's shorter than the album.
― mizzell, Thursday, 7 June 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)
I had a spell of loving this...then not listening to ages. I waited to get the vinyl and finally scored it last week...it's blowing me away more than it ever did.
I suffer from sleep difficulties, I average 4ish hours per night...when I go into work at 9am with the first three tracks off Person Pitch on my headphones, I feel like I could wrestle an elephant and win.
― Mister Craig, Thursday, 5 July 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)
does the vinyl sound as trebly/tinny as the cd? or is that his "aesthetic?" the Jane <i>Berserker</i> cd sounds the same way. i was thinking of buying the vinyl...
― nerve_pylon, Thursday, 5 July 2007 02:43 (eighteen years ago)
er, i mean Berserker
― nerve_pylon, Thursday, 5 July 2007 02:44 (eighteen years ago)
where can one find the vinyl?
― Preview of the Matrix 12, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:13 (eighteen years ago)
here
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
oh.
― Preview of the Matrix 12, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
i find track 3 on the "people ep" to be weirdly melancholy, even if it does sound like a chorus of deaf horses.
― the next grozart, Sunday, 8 July 2007 02:40 (eighteen years ago)
album of the year?
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 05:22 (eighteen years ago)
If you wish it, it is no dream.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:08 (eighteen years ago)
I agree with everything Ned says on this thread.
― Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:15 (eighteen years ago)
thrilling revive.
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:18 (eighteen years ago)
I agree with Ned aussi.
― W4LTER, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:26 (eighteen years ago)
but I can't shake the notion that in the end, it's little more than the musical equivalent of a magic-eye picture
Fandango otm here.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:41 (eighteen years ago)
No. 1? Hm.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
This is an ambient record. Or, that's how I treat it.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:16 (eighteen years ago)
Mainly because of the sonics.
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)
^i try to do this but then he sings. this is why "i'm not" kills every other song on the record.
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:25 (eighteen years ago)
this is why i'm not
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)
OMG NUBMER ONE PITCHFORK MOKA U RA RITE BCAUSE PITCKROFK IS NEVER RONG
― The Reverend, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
moka = scottpl
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:44 (eighteen years ago)
Aha!
― The Reverend, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:52 (eighteen years ago)
I'm surprised that this would be PF's number one. I really like it but always saw it as a low-profile distraction, whereas these lists seem to usually go for the big statements.
― baaderonixx, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 11:14 (eighteen years ago)
told you.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)
on other things... Fact Magazine's Top 100 songs of 2007 is way better than pitchfork's:
http://www.factmagazine.co.uk/da/66290
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)
-- Mordechai Shinefield, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 09:41 (12 hours ago) Link
is this a criticism? cuz anything that can manage to be the musical equivalent of a magic-eye picture is, putting aside whether it is enjoyable or good or whatever, at least interesting.
― artdamages, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
think this is more interesting than a stereogram but agree that it's an ambient album and that 'i'm not' is probably the highlight but could do with some strings
― blueski, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)
xpost I don't think magic eye pictures deserve acclaim. I think they are shticky and just because you can cross your eyes to see the picture doesn't mean that that picture is a work of art. Goodie, you can decipher the Panda Bear album. But that doesn't make it any good.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)
i don't know, i think this album is fucking great. i hardly think it relies on any "shticky" gimmicks, rather, it's a pretty sonically adventurous album that has a ton of layers that reveal themselves pretty generously with each play. as a lot of its positive reviews have already stated (better than i can), it does a fucking excellent job of synthesizing some really great pop melodies with a lot of sonic experimentation (more than you'll find in most of this year's acclaimed indie records) and pretty brilliantly juxtaposes a ton of interesting influences - dub, psychedelia, 60s pop, ambient music, electronic music, etc. i don't want to sound like press release here and i also don't want to just say "good influences = good music", but this album is pretty fucking cool and i'm very happy it's getting all the acclaim it is.
― Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 23:52 (eighteen years ago)
magic eye posters look all squiggly and nondescript at first glance. it is only through concentration and crossing your eyes that something emerges.
― artdamages, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 23:58 (eighteen years ago)
Besides, what's so cryptic about this album? The melodies are obvious, most of the lyrics are easy to understand. It's fun to listen to.
― filthy dylan, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)
ya i dont get what the secret picture is here. most of the songs are pretty hooky.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)
It's more like putting shit in your ears, waiting for it to harden, then forcefully extracting the hardened shit from your ears.
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)
lol
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)
I thought I loved this record, but now that Pitchfork loves it I'm not so sure...
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:11 (eighteen years ago)
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/61NZPNFHCFL._SS500_.jpg
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://cache.idolator.com/assets/resources/2007/03/ryan.jpg
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:15 (eighteen years ago)
How many people who like this have heard "Here Comes the Indian"?
― abanana, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:15 (eighteen years ago)
That album is good and this album less so but when you say it like that it sounds all indie dick comparing.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)
If you want a shit gimmick/musical magic eye/whatever, Pullhair Rubeye is your man. Eeurgh.
― Telephone thing, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:18 (eighteen years ago)
Panda Bear is the auditory equivalent to the physical experience of putting your hand in a blender. It hurts immediately, cause it's hard to shove the top of the blender on when your hand is still attached to your arm. Then around the third track, it becomes more painful when you turn the blender on and your fingers get sliced to ribbons. By the fifth track, the gutted finger smoothie becomes pretentious.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:26 (eighteen years ago)
i dont like this album much either but this guy mordechai seriously loves my chemical romance and hanna montana so like dont listen to him.
― chaki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 00:44 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah I guess if you liked those you probably wouldn't like this.
― filthy dylan, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
OTM - that record was fucking ridiculous, in a bad way. Panda Bear also fucking ridiculous, but in a good way. Also, since it hasn't been said - the smoothie analogy above is terrible.
― stephen, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 01:41 (eighteen years ago)
^^^yes. reverend's forceful extraction of hardened shit >>>>>>>>>>> mordechai's finger smoothie
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 01:48 (eighteen years ago)
this album is like a ham sandwich
― artdamages, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:24 (eighteen years ago)
Ham sandwiches are delicious. This album is not. So no, this album is not like a ham sandwich.
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)
"search for delicious"
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)
I also seriously like Bob Dylan and Iron + Wine. Wtf is with the assumption that if you like one kind of music you can't like another? I hate Panda Bear on its own terms, not on some aesthetic principle that only MCR can be good.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 02:59 (eighteen years ago)
1. everyone likes bob dylan. 2. iron and wine fans probably wouldnt enjoy person pitch. 3. everything you write on ilm would expect me to believe that this kind of record wouldnt be up your ally.
― chaki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)
expect = lead
― chaki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)
iron and wine fans probably wouldnt enjoy person pitch.. maybe. my girlfriend loves both though.
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:08 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.desktoprating.com/wallpapers/animal-wallpapers-pictures/panda-bear-wallpaper.jpg
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:10 (eighteen years ago)
aww
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:11 (eighteen years ago)
1. everyone likes bob dylan.
RONG
― Paul in Santa Cruz, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:24 (eighteen years ago)
@chaki, also, while I have lots of questionable taste, much of that taste comes from listening to things with open ears. I've listened to Person Pitch about a dozen times now, hoping I'll suddenly "get it." It doesn't get better. Maybe I need to listen to it with someone who likes it, who is willing to deconstruct it for me as we listen. Because it just hurts my ears.
And this isn't proof of anything, but every friend of mine that I've played it for hasn't enjoyed it either. So I don't know who the audience for this album is, but it's no one I personally know. (Which is to say: Maybe if I knew people who liked this music, they'd be able to communicate their love of it to me.) But recommend a track and give me a brief explanation of why you like it, and I swear, I'll listen to it and give it a fair shake.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:25 (eighteen years ago)
I don't like Bob Dylan, but I like him more than I like Panda Bear.
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:26 (eighteen years ago)
y'all were hating on this over on the year-end thread also. if you have really listened to it a dozen times then I salute you, that's more than I would do with a record I didn't like. FWIW, I think of it as much more of a psych/experimental thing than an indie rock album. then the long static parts make much more sense - "Good Girl" is probably my favorite just because of the way it sounds, not because of any specific structural or harmonic reasons. it's all about the explosions as I said way upthread.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)
I just relistened to Good Girl. I still don't get it. I can't understand what he's saying, it sounds like there are animal noises in the background, and the song is fairly precipitous musically. I feel like I'm hearing the same beat over and over in short 2 second intervals. And it keeps getting layered (swishing noises, what sounds like machine beeps, in the background I think I can hear some kind of sci-fi spaceship noise, and what sounds like the wash cycle on a washing machine). Frankly, it gives me a huge headache. It's not as bad when all that background noise falls away (around 2:30 in the song), but then it just sounds like he's singing gibberish, and you can just sense the annoying background about to burst forward.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:10 (eighteen years ago)
iron and wine fans probably wouldnt enjoy person pitch.
?!?
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:27 (eighteen years ago)
I feel like I'm hearing the same beat over and over in short 2 second intervals. And it keeps getting layered
There may be a rather large swath of music that isn't up your alley.
― Z S, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 04:36 (eighteen years ago)
Mordechai, there is thing, called "dance music", have you heard of it?
I love this album. Am a bit surprised that Pitchfork's albums of the year have been my albums of the year (this year equal favourite with Studio) two years running. Have I become more pitchforky since I started writing for them perhaps.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:42 (eighteen years ago)
maybe pitchfork has become more tim f.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:45 (eighteen years ago)
I can't understand what he's saying, it sounds like there are animal noises in the background, and the song is fairly precipitous musically. I feel like I'm hearing the same beat over and over in short 2 second intervals. And it keeps getting layered (swishing noises, what sounds like machine beeps, in the background I think I can hear some kind of sci-fi spaceship noise, and what sounds like the wash cycle on a washing machine).
if these are things you dislike in music, you and i have very, very different taste
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:04 (eighteen years ago)
max how do you feel about skye sweetnam?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:16 (eighteen years ago)
DLD91287 (2 hours ago) 0 Reply | Spam Well..I am happy there is an artist out there that actually speaks the truth about people! Skyesoldier00 (57 minutes ago) 0 Reply | Spam Yes, Skye truly is an inspiration in a world full of money grubbing self centered fools!
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:26 (eighteen years ago)
Not to bang on - actually, fuck it, to bang on and on and on and on and on - I'd like this an awful lot more if it wasn't so flat and one dimensional sounding, physically; I like the ideas, I like the melodies, I like the sonic juxtapositions and the actual 'tunes'. I don't like the fact that I can't climb inside it, that it feels like a plank of wood or pane of glass or sheet of steel. I can't put it on and feel it flow around me in three dimensions. Hence, ambient. Which I feel is a shame, because there's a lot of pop in this record, I just can't touch it.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)
i know some soldiers in here where they at? where they at?
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:28 (eighteen years ago)
Are you fucking kidding me?
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
It's just that your description of "Good Girl" makes it sound like a great dance track.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
Except for the part where it's awful. I don't found dance track vocals incomprehensible, the don't find them layered to the point where I get a headache, and I don't find the rhythm impossible to keep track of. In fact, I find dance tracks all the opposite of that.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)
the = then
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
Unless, of course, by dance you mean something entirely different than dance music. I consider dance music something you can dance to.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)
to shove aside the pitchfork year end list and the inevitable debates that will occur here in regards to it, at least Panda Bear had the only End of the Year Guestlist that was worth looking at. like 36 lists of pure, unadelterated almost masturbatorily 'pitchfork' lists, 3 that were good, and then his, which included both Pantha du Prince AND the Enjoi video!
― mehlt, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:58 (eighteen years ago)
Also, I don't even know who Skye is. I know she did a song with Tim Armstrong from Rancid. And I like Rancid. And I liked the song. But I've never heard anything else by her. So let's not mischaracterize my taste in music by saying that people I liked one song she participated in, OBVIOUSLY that explains why I don't like Panda Bear.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)
Goddamit. I don't know how the word "people" got in that paragraph. I should just go back to sleep.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
ilx mindhive clusterfuck consensus: Person Pitch=#1 punching bag of 2007
― M.V., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
or hivemind, if you will
― M.V., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
It's probably my favorite cover art of the year, in any case.
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)
Oh yeah.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
Ok. Here's the deal. I've got open ears and I actually want to like this album. Whoever can get me to like this album (by pointing stuff out, by explaining things, by telling me to pay attention to a particular thing) wins. I will listen to anything recommended. If you want to give me a music history lesson, because that is what it takes to appreciate this album, go right ahead.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
Hmm, I think if you can't see immediately what's great about 'Bros' then there's no real point in persisting.
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
dude if you've listened to it 12 times and you don't like, why continue trying? it doesn't matter if it makes every damn critics' top 5, if you don't like, you don't like it!
there's a lot of highly acclaimed albums this year that i have basically no interest in trying to like, and i'm fine with that.
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
there's lots of "it"s missing from my first couple sentences.
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
xposts
but see, you don't like it! every time somebody tries this you valiantly listen and report back with the same bleak prognosis (which again is to your credit, although it kinda looks like banging your head against a wall at this point). It's OK to not get it or like it! I hate most of the top records this year, including some you probably really like. do you listen to stuff like Zoviet France? because I think throwing out all the "indie" pre-conceptions and treating this record like pure sound really is your best bet.
also, nobody can understand the words in "Good Girl". they are backwards and the lyrics are not important to the experience of the song.
i.e. what Baaderonix said.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
I guess my problem is, I've never heard an album I didn't understand as little as this one. Even albums I've disliked (and I railed pretty hard against Joanna Newsom last year) I still got what was there. I still saw what people saw there, and then rejected it. This I can't even see what's there. People compare it to the Beach Boys, but I love the Beach Boys.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
-- mizzell, Wednesday, June 6, 2007 9:37 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Link
I stick by this and think that maybe the people who aren't pleased with the production of PP whould check it out.
― mizzell, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
should check it out
― mizzell, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
This I can't even see what's there.
who on earth are you friends with?? like, who do you spend your time with that youve actually never met anyone who likes music like this?
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
sorry i hate to add to the pile-on but like... panda bear is not "out there" at all by any means. there are a lot of pretty basic things at work here that people tend to really like. if you actually cant even "see what's there" it makes me feel like you grew up in a bubble.
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)
i walked around listening to this while stoned a lot this year
― carne asada, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah. Whatever. I just did a search for Panda Bear on my college facebook network and not one result came up. So I did a search on a friend's college facebook network, and not one result came up. Neither of our colleges are enormous, so that's one factor, but these aren't tiny 40 person universities either. Out of around 6,000 people (assuming 50% of people create facebook pages and list their music), NO ONE likes Panda Bear. So I'd say it's pretty "out there."
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
dude, get a hobby.
― mizzell, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
12-minute hazey georgian-chant Beach Boys sound collagesaren't "out there" AT ALL?
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
"out there" in the sense that its so weird and ugly and strange that its impossible to even find someone who likes it let alone enjoy it yourself
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
2. iron and wine fans probably wouldnt enjoy person pitch.
really? seems totally softywofty to me. i don't mean that as a dis.
― sean gramophone, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
i dont know what to say to you about your facebook stats mordy but if you actually think that anywhere near 50% of people are neurotic enough to keep their music section obsessively up-to-date (if they use it at all) than youre crazy
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
and actually i dont really get what your argument is? i mean, clearly, a lot of people like this, right? so why does it matter that no one you know on facebook has it in their profile?
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
You said I must live in a bubble since Panda Bear isn't "out there" at all and tons of people like it. I said that no one at my college has it listed as favorite music (whatever that means) so I suspect you've got a skewed view of its popularity.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
no, i said you live in a bubble since apparently you dont know anyone for whom things like repetitive beats, atmospheric sounds and weirdly-tracked vocals would be appealing.
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)
... Ok. Fuck this.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
mordechai seriously, i dont give a shit that you dont like this; we all like different music, its fine, but when you say things like "i get why people listen to joanna newsom but i dont get why people like this at all" its either enormously dishonest or terrifically ignorant
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)
FWIW, I like Iron & Wine (a lot) and I like Person Pitch (albeit less than Iron & Wine). I don't see why they're mutually exclusive.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)
I've given up on this record and you all should too
― sonderangerbot, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
This album shrunk on me really fast. It sounded really great at first but didn't have much to offer me on repeated listens.
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
i dont know why i said this. they are both twee ass white people pussy bullshit music.
― chaki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
Mordechai Shinefield goes to Yeshiva University right?
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
He does.
― Mordechai Shinefield, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)
Earlier this year when I was walking around listening to this while stoned a lot, this was my favorite record of the year, too. Then again, I think one night I fooled myself into thinking the Wannadies "You and Me Song" was one of the greatest pop singles of all time, while terribly overboard stoned. This album still rules.
As far as the Mordechai vs max debate goes, I think you're both right and wrong a little.
Mordechai, like others have said, if you don't like it after 12 listens, just shelve it for a while. It's not a big deal, really, and later you may come around to it. That's what happened with me this year and XTC. I made a failed concerted effort to get into them, forgot about it for a while, and then one day I heard "Complicated Game" in a friend's car and it clicked all of a sudden.
Max, I get behind most of what you're saying, but realize that beyond ILM and music blog world, there are tons of people who have no idea who Animal Collective are, let alone Panda Bear. It's cool he's even giving it a chance, that's more than what most people would do with music that is wholly unfamiliar sounding.
― Z S, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
Panda Bear 1,176,982 plays scrobbled on Last.fm (mostly in the past year) Amy Winehouse 7,719,474 plays scrobbled on Last.fm The Beatles 71,356,933 plays scrobbled on Last.fm
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
I'd say that's pretty popular!
Sure, but -
I was just about to make some argument that last.fm users tended to skew toward indie music, but then I checked the stats and saw that the Red Hot Chili Peppers were #3 overall, so there goes that.
I guess Panda Bear is MASSIVE!
― Z S, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
i finally listened to this. it's ok, about what i expected. pretty, but wispy. the pfork enthronement is funny, it's like they're trying to prove the point that sfj couldn't quite prove himself.
― tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
my argument isnt even about whether or not panda bear is popular!!! most of the people i spend time with wont have heard of them at all. im just saying, if mordechai is posting on ilm and fancies himself something of a critic, saying shit like "i dont understand why people like this at all" a couple hours after articulating 4 reasons that i like this record is either naive or dishonest!
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
and being like "none of my friends on facebook like this album" isnt really a rejoinder to "how on earth can you not tell what people like about this album"
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)
trying to prove the point that sfj couldn't quite prove himself.
I was thinking this also, but Person Pitch is apparently dubby, too. A dubby Beach Boys homage.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
^^it's incredibly dubby!
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
To be fair, I really don't think that was the point he was trying to address with his Facebook stats.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)
dubby usually implies some sort of groove
― chaki, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)
i don't have a dog in this fight really. i like this album but it didn't exactly grab me, but i don't think it was trying to. it had a lot of really interesting shit going on in it, lots of cool repetition and a sustained hazy mood. it has a cool dreamlike logic, i guess: i can imagine exactly the overall texture and color and a few snips of melody, but i can't lay out in my head which 'songs' came where or anything. it's that kind of record.
but it's still 'pop,' i mean, this isn't serialism or kevin drumm or any over the other true-blue avant shit i've picked up and made myself listen to over the years and had to really think hard: "ok, what exactly is the engine of enjoyment/interest at work here -- cos it's not hooks or beats or wit or any of the other stuff i'm used to listening for, out of habit." i still don't think i hear everything that's happening in 'out' music, but, i've got plenty of time. life is pretty long! i figure my retirement will be full of long days listening to woyzeck or whatever.
mordechai it seems like you don't have a lot of experience with that kind of record, or you're making a big show of being baffled by it. "I've never heard an album I didn't understand as little as this one" ok well, first, there's a whole universe of music that is way more incomprehensible that this! and second: maybe forget about having total understanding of it!
like i said, it has a lot of pretty obvious 'dreamlike' or 'hazy' things going on (echo, repetition, voices in the distance, all that), it's practially BEGGING to be called such. so saying "this record is SO WEIRD what the FUUUCK guys!!?!?" seems of a kind with being creeped out by metallica in 07 or something
― gff, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
man i never write anything very long on ilx! and i don't even care that much about panda bear! very pretty album, though, i should listen to it again.
― gff, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)
Chatterbox.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
let me reiterate:
if you actually cant even "see what's there" it makes me feel like you grew up in a bubble.
^^^^^ the "bubble" of which i am speaking is NOT a "bubble" where no one likes panda bear. no one, in the broadest sense, likes panda bear. i get that. the "bubble" is the place where you cant figure out for the life of you why people might like things like: a repetitive beat, atmospherics, weird vocals, etc (nb thats not my description of panda bear, that's mordechai's!!). when i said its not very "out there" i mean that its not so strange or bizarre that there arent (clearly) plenty of people who like it; i mean, most of the songs have a rhythm and a melody which places them in the "fairly normal" category from where im sitting.
xxpost gff otm
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)
really? sure the deep bass groove is important (and there are even parts of person pitch that have that, regardless), but what sonically distinguishes dub from say, reggae (which has the same bass groove, i guess) are all the atmospherics, the echo, reverb, ambient noises, weird sense of space, etc. all these mean dub to me more than a groove.
― Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
dubby usually implies some sort of groove-- chaki, Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:36 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
-- chaki, Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:36 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
GOOD GIRLS/CARROTS
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
fwiw, I dislike this album
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
This is a really strange record to get all baffled by. Its virtues are pretty immediate. My only complaint, really, is that it hasn't grown very well (kinda the opposite of being impenetrable).
― Billy Pilgrim, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
great thread. max is right.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
Probably because it's really sonically hollow; there's not much to go back to, nothing that reveals itself on further listens, because it's all flat. It's beautiful, but completely... surface.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
But yeah, if you can't see AT ALL why other people would like this, even slightly, then you're being very... bloody minded.
People compare it to the Beach Boys, but I love the Beach Boys.
should probably just let this drop but if you can watch the Comfy in Nautica video and still say "I don't get what this has to do with the Beach Boys" then I got nothin' more for ya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25_gjUbvqNg
still love this album .... I'm with Tim F., this and Studio are the tops
― dmr, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
I totally see the Beach Boys thing, but I passionately despise the Beach Boys, too.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)
rev if i didnt already know you were a bro your dislike of chic and the beach boy would probably make me hate you
― max, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
wow that video rules!
― Mark Clemente, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
Naw, I have nothing against Chic, I just don't get 'em. The Beach Boys DRIVE ME FUCKING INSANE.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)
I hate those kind of cherubic Glee Club white people voices, is what it is.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
I love the Beach Boys, but Panda Bear didn't really do it for me the first couple times I heard the album. Should probably give it another go. I do like the Beach Boys homage "College" on Animal Collective's Sung Tongs.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
the Beach Boys are white?! oh man...
― blueski, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)
I was shocked when I found out, too.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
I sort of understand what people mean when thay say this album has "shrunk" on them - it totally hasn't for me, but it's exactly the sort of music that I would absolutely expect to. I've been surprised that I love it so much every time i put it on.
― Tim F, Thursday, 20 December 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
I find this album irritatingly irresolute and wallpaper-y.
― Turangalila, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 08:41 (eighteen years ago)
let us not go down this road again.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 2 January 2008 08:47 (eighteen years ago)
I'm really not into the Beach Boys much at all. The early songs about having sex in cars with your girlfriend's sister are OK, and there's a smattering of decent tunes from later on, but most of it leaves me cold.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 09:06 (eighteen years ago)
I don't even think it sounds like the Beach Boys at all, apart from maybe a few vague signifiers. They certainly never were *this* plodding and drowned in bullshit digi-verb production.
― Turangalila, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 11:00 (eighteen years ago)
Some of the vocal workouts on this record remind me of a cross between The Missa Luba and the Beach Boys' "Cool, Cool Water."
― QuantumNoise, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 13:07 (eighteen years ago)
"...bullshit digi-verb production."
-- Turangalila, Wednesday, January 2, 2008 6:00 AM (7 hours ago)
― kiss out the jams, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
Fine, not bullshit digiverb. To quote my friend Nick, "it's more like wanna-be Warn Defever circa '94"
― Turangalila, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
Bullshit Digi-Verb: That's What's Happening!
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
I've heard my share of bullshit digi-verb and sir I can tell you that that is not bullshit digi-verb.
I like this record. It's a bit of an over-simplification to say it sounds like Warn Defever circa '94-'96. Structurally, all those songs (most of which are quite awesome) are about juxtaposition. The Panda Bear tracks are more about blending and mixing allusion and influence--not to imply that this is somehow revolutionary or something because it's not.
I like the more Krauty aspects of the record. The way Bros ends with Amon Duul circa Psychedelic Underground riffage is what makes the track for me. Also, sampling Ananas Symphonie off Ralf and Florian on one track is a nice touch.
― Bill in Chicago, Thursday, 3 January 2008 03:02 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I guess it's not really that gated, reverb sound from the 80s. It's more of a faux Brian Wilson vibe, but without any of the compositional components that made BW interesting.
You make it sound so exciting, though. Heh.
― Turangalila, Thursday, 3 January 2008 03:58 (eighteen years ago)
actually I was gonna say you make it sound like a record critic record
― Dominique, Thursday, 3 January 2008 04:01 (eighteen years ago)
haha yes
― Turangalila, Thursday, 3 January 2008 04:05 (eighteen years ago)
a few months back, in a moment of less-than-perfect lucidity, I described this record to a friend of mine as the musical equivalent of one of those waterslides that's partially open and partially enclosed. I'm still not really sure what I meant by that, but every time I think about this record, the metaphor makes more and more sense to me.
I guess in the end, the strongest impression I take away from this album is one of extreme linearity... but somehow, that doesn't make it any less enjoyable. people who said there were no details to discover on repeat listens were right. for me, though, much of the appeal lies in the way that everything fits together. "Good Girl/Carrots" is a great example of what I'm talking about: 3 distinct sections, all more or less static. within the first 10 seconds of each, I remember exactly how it goes and know what to expect for the next 4 minutes or so. but somehow, I have trouble keeping the overall structure of the song in my head, and the way the different movements (ugh, sorry, I can't think of a less pretentious word) flow into each other never fails to excite me. the whole album feels like that to me, really; it's almost like listening to a really good DJ set, or an awesome radio station.
― bernard snowy, Thursday, 3 January 2008 05:35 (eighteen years ago)
panda designs a hat http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2103/2233678058_f580958593_o.jpg
― mizzell, Friday, 1 February 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)
I bet this will be big with the "bape hoodies in union sq" crue
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 1 February 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
Also, sampling Ananas Symphonie off Ralf and Florian on one track is a nice touch.
where is that?
― baaderonixx, Friday, 1 February 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
damn it guys why were you all talking about dance music up there, i finally bought this and it isn't like dance music at all!
― jabba hands, Saturday, 2 February 2008 02:04 (seventeen years ago)
All music is dance music, white boy.
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Saturday, 2 February 2008 02:08 (seventeen years ago)
Im starting to get into the second half more than the first, because they have this on vinyl @ work. It reminds me of orbital
― filthy dylan, Saturday, 2 February 2008 08:36 (seventeen years ago)
every time i open this thread all i can think is DAMN GIRL WAY TO MAKE BOOBS UNSEXY.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 2 February 2008 08:49 (seventeen years ago)
yay Maryland. i totally live there. i'm glad Baltimore's hip now.
― circa1916, Monday, 4 February 2008 02:35 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah I saw that pattern and I felt a lil burst of civic pride. (halfway through season four of the WIRE it could use a boost)
― Drew Daniel, Monday, 4 February 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)
<em>To quote my friend Nick, "it's more like wanna-be Warn Defever circa '94"</em>
turangalila's friend otm. sounds like something he woulda done had he put together <em>king of sweet</em> around the time of <em>stars on esp</em>.
― john. a resident of chicago., Sunday, 9 March 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
that hat is a bit much
― braveclub, Sunday, 9 March 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
http://sickmouthy.com/2013/02/23/panda-bear-person-pitch-2007/
― they all are afflicted with a sickness of existence (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 23 February 2013 15:31 (twelve years ago)
a lost classic- this, 'laughed for a world filled with fantasy,' and 'boneless' are all better than p much anything on person pitch. but maybe i've just played it out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZWLQKVwCSA
― flappy bird, Friday, 2 December 2016 07:15 (nine years ago)
I wouldn't say they're better, but they'd make a nice deluxe edition of Person Pitch if you added them in. The best one is Song For Ariel, which later became Guys Eyes on MPP. The solo version is based on a sample that sounds a lot like Dreams by Fleetwood Mac, but is actually Leave Me Be by The Zombies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIICXi18JAg
There's also this little sketch from a 2007 compilation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiFNULZEniw
For completeness, here's Laugh for a World Filled With Fantasy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7063I9L_wHw
and Boneless:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJFEBunBHRY
― the_ecuador_three, Friday, 2 December 2016 13:44 (nine years ago)
Song for Ariel is the one I'm sad for not making it into PP.
― Moka, Friday, 2 December 2016 14:13 (nine years ago)
boneless is especially awesome for being a 'remix' of a song that contains no elements, melodies, lyrics from the original at all
― flappy bird, Friday, 2 December 2016 21:53 (nine years ago)
sweet new hour-long interview with Noah about the making of Person Pitch. this group is reissuing the record on vinyl next month http://www.vinylmeplease.com/magazine/listen-interview-panda-bear-about-person-pitch/
― flappy bird, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)
panda bear's new song with sonic boom is the most brian wilson-y thing in a long career full of brian wilson-y things
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMNZuZe2OCY
― in places all over the world, real stuff be happening (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 9 August 2022 15:38 (three years ago)
new album is very much a person pitch throwback with its focus on loops, samples & extremely beach boys vocals
sometimes the repetition is a bit too much but it's pretty solid overall, certainly the best panda bear album since person pitch & easily one of the stronger animal collective-related albums in the past 12 years
― ufo, Sunday, 14 August 2022 07:38 (three years ago)
Yeah it's a fantastic album. My favourite Anco thing in a decade or so.
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Sunday, 14 August 2022 07:50 (three years ago)
This feels like Person Pitch 2 in a good way. Need to spend more time with it but liked a lot what I heard on first listen.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Sunday, 14 August 2022 09:06 (three years ago)
It should probably also be noted here that he sang on my favorite song of the year so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqKjFj6YoWM
― Chris L, Sunday, 14 August 2022 10:16 (three years ago)
Agree with you on that one. Song of the year.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Sunday, 14 August 2022 12:47 (three years ago)
really what "doin it right" should have been
― ufo, Sunday, 14 August 2022 13:05 (three years ago)
really liked the new album as well, especially the scott walker-y spanish-tinged one near the end
― mr. weird al and the box squeezers (voodoo chili), Sunday, 14 August 2022 13:07 (three years ago)
I'm not a big Panda Bear fan — a little usually goes a long way for me — but I do like the new one. Peter Kember is a good partner for him, I think he opens up the mix more, lets it breathe.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 14 August 2022 15:42 (three years ago)
He is having a hell of a year. Time Skiffs, that incredible "Step by Step" track above and now this truly lovely album with Kember. Wow.
― gman59, Monday, 15 August 2022 21:25 (three years ago)
totally forgot there was a new anco album this year lol
― comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Monday, 15 August 2022 21:36 (three years ago)
You’re in luck, it’s amazing
― frogbs, Monday, 15 August 2022 21:49 (three years ago)
I love that Braxe EP
I enjoyed the couple times I've breezed through the (seemingly very short) Noah/Sonic album! It is so so so Brian Wilson-y like even more so than before but that's OK
― flamboyant goon tie included, Monday, 15 August 2022 23:05 (three years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAKCduc2fA4
this is pleasant, seems like it's a good year for panda bear collabs
― ufo, Wednesday, 31 August 2022 16:40 (three years ago)
"First widely available reissue in 15 years"
https://www.turntablelab.com/products/panda-bear-person-pitch-vinyl-2lp?goal=0_8b218d7604-f4ba19c341-31345977&mc_cid=f4ba19c341&mc_eid=365684acc9
― Indexed, Friday, 16 December 2022 18:34 (three years ago)
Also available on his Bandcamp https://pandabearmusic.bandcamp.com/album/person-pitch
― mizzell, Friday, 16 December 2022 18:44 (three years ago)
grabbed it today and came to the realization this album is his Olias of Sunhillow
― frogbs, Tuesday, 24 January 2023 05:12 (two years ago)
It is! I know people compare them in terms of sound but also it's there in regards to them being sorta busman's holidays that are even better than anything they was doing with their main groups.
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Tuesday, 24 January 2023 08:11 (two years ago)
haha wow, good call
― sleeve, Tuesday, 24 January 2023 15:11 (two years ago)
Overrated. Beach boys for the pitchfork generation
― CerebralCaustic, Thursday, 26 January 2023 15:22 (two years ago)
this thread is how i first came across ilx. lol
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 26 January 2023 16:15 (two years ago)
Still sad after all these years “song for ariel” didn’t make it into the album, more songs should have The Zombies samples
I know the song got repurposed for Guys Eyes but that one is nowhere as good as this one.
― ✖✖✖ (Moka), Thursday, 26 January 2023 18:33 (two years ago)
"Livin' in the After" is so great, can't believe it's under 3 minutes. should be the longest track on the album
― frogbs, Wednesday, 24 May 2023 02:46 (two years ago)
I know our AnCo crew here is pretty slim these days, but the new Panda Bear is really good! Actually getting a lot of Person Pitch vibes, but this one is even smoother and more accessible.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 4 March 2025 21:27 (ten months ago)
thanks for the reminder, I really dug Reset but that and PP are the only two Panda records I have
until now. I just found Tomboy for cheap.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 March 2025 21:45 (ten months ago)
will check it, thx
― sleeve, Tuesday, 4 March 2025 21:50 (ten months ago)
saw them open for Toro y Moi and was really impressed with much of the newer stuff that i was unfamiliar with
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 4 March 2025 22:09 (ten months ago)
It doesn't remind me of Person Pitch but I do like it more than the last one or two he did.
― sctttnnnt (pgwp), Wednesday, 5 March 2025 00:51 (ten months ago)
loving this. “ends meet” is person pitch core for sure
― brony james (k3vin k.), Friday, 7 March 2025 05:19 (ten months ago)
i listened to the new one once and it reminded me a lot of tomboy, but a bit more in focus. probably one of his stronger solo efforts alongside the album with sonic boom from a few years ago
― ufo, Friday, 7 March 2025 06:13 (ten months ago)
i like the drums on this album
― flopson, Friday, 7 March 2025 15:59 (ten months ago)
I initially liked Reset a lot but it had no staying power for me.
― Cow_Art, Friday, 7 March 2025 16:14 (ten months ago)
I've played Reset a billion times in recent months and can't seem to get bored of it
― PaulTMA, Friday, 7 March 2025 16:43 (ten months ago)
Performative whites more concerned with luigi’s sex tape and trying to make panda bear a thing again than anything real.— JPEGMAFIA (@jpegmafia) March 6, 2025
Don't like it as much as Reset - but then that is my most-listened to new album of the past few years, and it was amazing live too.
― you can see me from westbury white horse, Friday, 7 March 2025 16:57 (ten months ago)
after the first two songs i thought that this would be my favorite panda bear album ever. the second song, "anywhere but here," is one of the best anco-related songs i've ever heard, imo. the rest of it didn't quite live up to that high, but i did like it a lot
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Friday, 7 March 2025 16:59 (ten months ago)
Interesting, I thought it actually got even better as it went on! That Cindy Lee track works so well as a closer.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 7 March 2025 17:08 (ten months ago)
Venom's In is my favorite. I think this album is right below Grim Reaper and Reset for me.
― mizzell, Friday, 7 March 2025 17:11 (ten months ago)
I’m a big stan for Buoys, it’s if Young Prayer got an upgrade— lots of acoustic guitar, Rusty Santos keeping things dry and exciting, little (if any) vocal stacking, accusations of being “an autotune album” are massively overstated
― for fans of: |redacted|, |redacted|, (flamboyant goon tie included), Friday, 7 March 2025 20:09 (ten months ago)
Cannot stop listening to this new one, feels crazy to say it but I think this is now my favorite Animal Collective related album.
― Davey D, Monday, 10 March 2025 15:40 (ten months ago)