Now we beat up on Neil Hamburger

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well we've crucified both Bill Hicks and A HREF="http://www.ilxor.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0093X9">George Carlin, now lets beat up on Neil Hamburger: The Worst Comic in the History of the Planet Earth. Or so says Mark Prindle.

Lord Custos 2.0 beta, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neil Hamburger live was pretty cool. I can't imagine spending money on any of his records though.

adam, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Prindle's review mentions Negativland = Mark S will hunt and slay.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neil Hamburger has my sympathy.

J Blount, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does anyone remember the annoying unfunny officer that was Adrian Kronauers (Robin Williams) Boss in Good Morning Vietnam?
I wonder if they based his "Frenchie" routine on Neil Hambugers "Exercises for the Colon" routine.

Lord Custos 2.0 beta, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think neil hamburger is great. you ever notice that all 711's look tha same?

chaki, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what's going on friday night??? CANCEL IT!!!!! Neeeeiiiiiilll Haaaammmmbuuurger's in town!!!

Ron, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neil is a good guy and deserves everyone's undying attention

Sonicred, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neil Hamburger also really likes the Bee Gees.

Vic Funk, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OH DEAR GOD! He's touring with Canned Hamm and Pleeseasaur!

Pleeseasaur is like... well, imagine Bill Murray's lounge singer character in a bunny suit in front of strange film projections all to a goofy MIDI soundtrack singing about things like THE BEEF FLAVORED ISLAND or Japan's favorite dish, the BOWL NOODLE HOT! Don't miss Neil AND the 'Saur together!

Canned Hamm, from Vancouver BC, is equally strange and wonderfully wretched.

Brian MacDonald, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the man's got the best Bert Convy anecdotes in the business.

J Blount, Friday, 10 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
"I'm a male stripper. I STRIP humor out of the air and present it to a MALE and female audience!"

Amarillo-era Neil was great, totally amazing comedy cutting edge "gee gaw" humor.

gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 9 November 2003 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

METALLICA!!!!!

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 9 November 2003 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"Great Phone Calls" is so so so so classic

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Sunday, 9 November 2003 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)

A true professional, but he should never have those nasty things about Woody Woodbury.

Dinah Sore (Ian Christe), Sunday, 9 November 2003 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Are Neil Hamburger and Gregg Turkington one and the same?

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)

yes

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

yes

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Do I have to spell it out for you? I don't eat cooked flour.

re..si..sting...urge to..quote.......more!

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The "moment of silence for Princess Diana" 7" (untouched vinyl, of course, packaged with a kleenex to wipe away your tears) is pure fucking gold.

Ben Boyer (Ben Boyer), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)

perhaps one of the funniest shows i ever saw was the Zip Code Rapists with Greg Turkington assaulting a hippy there by throwing a plastic bottle at his head. gygax! right on about the Amarillo years. the hamburger schtick, though, has gotten old (but faxhead still rulez).

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand why people think this dork, Bill Hicks, OR David Cross is all that funny. (And I admit I haven't spent all THAT much time on any of them, so maybe I'm missing something -- I just wish somebody would tell me what. Now, they all strike me as REALLY REALLY REALLY OBVIOUS.) But the second post on the Hicks thread gave me a clue that I hadn't considered before, which makes lots of sense:

"... for people who've been smoking pot so long they've forgotten how to come up with their OWN mind-blowing "have you ever really looked at your hand/the government is like totally not cool maaaaan" observations"

Guess that doesn't apply to Neil Hamburger (who, wow, MAKES FUN OF BAD COMEDIANS, oh i get it now); for the other two, I'll buy it.

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

the Princess Di pressed on black "in mourning" vinyl.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

when's gallagher going to be rediscovered? carrot top is but a shadow of the master.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Guess that doesn't apply to Neil Hamburger (who, wow, MAKES FUN OF BAD COMEDIANS, oh i get it now)

If anything it seems to be making fun of the conventions of comedy routines in general, bad or good -- why else all the audience cut-ups and the like?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

haha!

the "sounds of..." (international airports, san francisco adult bookstores, etc.) field recording 7"s are very in-line with the early neil aesthetic.

basically, search all neil hamburger 7"s (plus Great Phone Calls) and forget the rest.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

that haha! was a xp to andrew n.

i don't think neil's making fun of bad comedians.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

"Sounds of Fast Food Restaurants" was pretty funny. I think I have one of the other ones.

Broheems (diamond), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

off topic, slightly -- my girlfriend as this nutso cultist friend and she played for him my copy of Harvey Sid Fisher's Astrology Songs, which Greg reissued on Amarillo -- he was mesmerised by its Power and its astrological accuracy. Better yet, my girlfriend is completely annoyed that the song that describes her sign is "dead on" while the one that supposedly describes mine is "dead wrong."

ok, now im going to go into my room and cry in mourning for amarillo and the greg of yore.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

haha jc, what are her and your signs? mine is not very good. my favorite hsf's are "moonchild", "lib lib a libra" and certainly the best of the best: "i am the ram".

all of this of course is almost as good as the zip code rapists' version of "ford trucks, the best never rest".

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)

>>making fun of the conventions of comedy routines in general<<

And picking one of the easiest and most obvious targets on earth makes him funny (and not merely smug) why?

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Hell, Chuck, nothing automatically makes it funny. Me, I like what I've heard for all the awkward pauses and strange audience interjections. They make me laugh!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

her gemini, me aries. her astrological friend explains me away by saying im complicated -- ha ha ha.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I still need to scare up a copy of that Today's Sounds 45, with the cover of "Pac Man Fever". That was good fun. Also I always meant to get that Zip Code Rapists 45 that Kugelberg put out; you know, with "Good Ship Pablo Cruise" and "Che". Knee-slapping hilarity!

Broheems (diamond), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"And picking one of the easiest and most obvious targets on earth makes him funny (and not merely smug) why? "

Chuck, please explain to us why *anything* is funny. (Also what constitutes a non-"obvious" target).

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand why people think this dork, Bill Hicks, OR David Cross is all that funny. (And I admit I haven't spent all THAT much time on any of them, so maybe I'm missing something -- I just wish somebody would tell me what. Now, they all strike me as REALLY REALLY REALLY OBVIOUS.) But the second post on the Hicks thread gave me a clue that I hadn't considered before, which makes lots of sense:
"... for people who've been smoking pot so long they've forgotten how to come up with their OWN mind-blowing "have you ever really looked at your hand/the government is like totally not cool maaaaan" observations"

Guess that doesn't apply to Neil Hamburger (who, wow, MAKES FUN OF BAD COMEDIANS, oh i get it now); for the other two, I'll buy it.

-- chuck (cedd...), November 10th, 2003.


Well, Hicks and Cross may come off as obvious to us, but keep in mind, their acts are still hitting topics that most comedians wouldn't dare touch. And Cross's delivery is great.

David Allen, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

this whole debate is stupid, humor cannot be explained, most of the time it barely even crosses cultural/language barriers. If it makes you laugh, it's funny. Comedy isn't like music in this respect, it doesn't lend itself to critical analysis or debate most of the time - ie, nothing ever gets funnier the more its "explained" to you.

TS: comedy "critics" vs. music "critics"...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

So they're "daring". Wow.

>>Chuck, please explain to us why *anything* is funny<<

Read my books.

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Humor CAN be explained, Shakey Mo. Read Frank Kogan on Tom Lehrer (or Eminem), or James Hannaham on Richard Pryor, if you doubt me.

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I am definitely not buying the "it's not funny because the target is too broad" argument. Calling bullshit on that. Have you seen what "Mr. Show" did with "obvious targets" like bad stand-up comics (not to mention Marilyn Manson, MTV, etc.)? Lazy to write off something automatically for the concept. I mean, if it's funny, it's funny.

Ben Boyer (Ben Boyer), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Comedy is all in the delivery. Bill Hicks could talk about, I dunno, baseball or something and it would still be funny to me because he is so full of raging anger and misanthropy.

Broheems (diamond), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

jack writes wrt: HSF upthread:
her gemini, me aries. her astrological friend explains me away by saying im complicated -- ha ha ha.

that is messed up because(!!!) i am a gemini and the gemini song does not apply much to me, whereas the aries song is not only the best song on the record but also it totally fits ALL aries (including you)!

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(and that's a good thing!!!)

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

And actually, I'm sure some people have written even better things about Pryor than Hannaham did; he just came to the top of my head. If a writer can write about why the Ramones or Beastie Boys or Holy Modal Rounders or Kid Rock or Bob Dylan (or Lenny Bruce or Mark Twain or Cheech and Chong or Groucho Marx or Jack Black or ????) is funny, they can damn sure do the same for the three comedians mentioned above, who have VOICES, after all, not just words. If anybody has done this for Cross or Hamburger or Hicks, I'd love to read it. To say it can't be done makes no sense at all. Unless they're not funny.

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

So again, as I said above:

>>I admit I haven't spent all THAT much time on any of them, so maybe I'm missing something -- I just wish somebody would tell me what.<<<

And right -- obvious targets can be handled in a non-obvious way. Obviously. I've just yet to see where those three guys do that....

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"Read my books.

-- chuck"

Super cop-out answer, so I'm glad it wasn't your final answer... as for the comedy "criticism" you mention, which one of those convinced you any of the listed performers (Groucho Marx, Cheech and Chong, whoever) was funny?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

My point being that you can analyze and write (and read) about those comedians and they're acts all you want, but they won't make you laugh any more.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

here's a critical overview of neil hamburger's releases.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, my own praise of Hamburger was abbreviated a bit, but to spell it out more thoroughly -- it's how what I've heard (and again that's mostly the earlier albums) is designed to trash typical comedy albums/routine expectations. I dunno if this review says as much on my part but I think it's key and I happen to think it works for that album at least.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Anybody here rate Doug Stanhope? I find him funny as all git-out.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

"you can analyze and write (and read) about these rock bands and their acts all you want but they won't make you *feel* any more."

"you can analyze and write (and read) about these techno djs and their acts all you want but they won't make you dance any more."

"you can analyze and write (and read) about these resteraunts and their dishes all you want but they won't make you EAT any more."

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

wrt: the prindle overview... i 1000% agree that "looking for laughs" is the pinnacle of neil hamburger. i understand that it is (intentionally) obscure and probably a lot of the more vocal people on this thread are probably more/only familiar with his later work which complicates things but that's okay by me.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I just love prank calls!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I don't think I really got Bob Dylan's humor until I read Kogan about him -- at least, I learned what kind of things to listen for, you know? But right, maybe no one would CONVINCE me that any of those guys are funny; it just seems that, if they're great entertainers, they'd inspire somebody who DOES think they're funny to write interesting things about them. And maybe somebody HAS; it's not like I read comedy magazines. As for my "my book" answer; it wasn't a copout at all. I explain why lots of people are funny all through my books; wish I had time to do it all over again here, but I don't.

chuck, Monday, 10 November 2003 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)

PRANK CALLS!

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 10 November 2003 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

great phone calls is not entirely turkington... it's also trey sprance and mike patton (MP, just on the sax lessons/read my lips: scary call)

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

jack cole's ZCR review reminds me of two other experiences:

my first trip to SF about 11 years ago, my hosts took me to the chameleon to see the ZCR who had hired two guys to learn all the ZCR songs. turkington and singer showed up about 2 songs in and started heckling them and eventually a fight broke out between "fans" of the ZCR outside.

secondly, i have a bootleg of the ZCR opening for Faith No More, Mr. Bungle during the height of Faith No More's popularity and the ZCR came out to perplexed looks and eventually boos thanks to their approach of "How many of you guys like to party!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?" and the crowd would cheer and turkington would reply "Get a life you alcoholic junkies!!!!", which was followed by a line about women wanting to get down with a similar reply which was not very PC but on the tape you can hear the crowd just groaning after the ZCR just hella harshed their collective buzzes.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

has their been an amarillo records thread? i can't find it but i might be imagining there was one.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Have you ever heard of the Krinkles?

Broheems (diamond), Monday, 10 November 2003 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

(btw: chabela burrito (sic: it's chabela mexican restaurant) is very, very good and inexpensive AND located two doors down from amoeba (which, at the time, was the rock and bowl)).

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Darn1elle - That's the guy on "The Man Show," right? Are you referring to his stand-up, or his stuff on that show (which I decided to avoid aggressively when I heard it described as '"Maxim" the T.V. show').

And Chuck - David Cross has been doing obvious stuff in non-obvious ways for YEARS. His writing on Mr. Show is brilliant, as are his columns for magazines like Vice and the Onion. Are you writing him off based on hearing the one stand-up album? I think he's one of the most significant comedians of the last 20 years, easily.

Ben Boyer (Ben Boyer), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

What does he write in the Onion? Is there a byline? I'm just curious; I like a lot of stuff in there, hate a lot of other stuff in there, and have no idea who writes any of it...

Don't think I've ever read a single fucking WORD in Vice that I liked, but then again, it's been a long while since I tried.

Plus, many, many people (including in ILX) have said I LOOK like the guy, so maybe that just weirds me out, who knows.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:47 (twenty-one years ago)

of the three picked out on this thread, Cross is easily the least interesting and least provocative in terms of stand-up. Hicks and Hamburger were both doing things that were really confrontational with their audience, and their respective schticks really hinged on that. I still don't think describing either act at great length will make either sound "funny" - the visceral, uncomfortable feelings of watching either perform don't translate so well into a strictly "this is a funny joke because..." dialogue.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Hamburger were both doing things that were really confrontational with their audience

See, this is what I DON'T get, since Hamburger's deal was obviously studio-created and designed at the start. If you come in knowing that was already the joke, then an actual performance is a bit pointless.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Did they used to do confrontational things TO their audience? Again, I'm really curious. Because for as long as I've heard them, their audiences seem to mainly consist of hipsters just as smug as they seem to be. Though maybe I'm wrong; again, that's only my impression. (And I probably have my own smug hipster moments, okay I admit it.) And if their audience has changed, how often do they confront the crowd that "gets" them (assuming they once had a crowd, maybe, that didn't)? (And assuming Hicks got such a crowd before he died, too.)

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, at this point the cat's out of the bag for Hamburger but it seems to me like he initially got quite a lot of mileage out of people not figuring out if he was "for real" or not, and much of that was the point. Maybe he should retire the character now... Hicks was different, but he really would go as far as possible to piss off the audience, even ones that initially adored him, his whole thing was about provocation.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

See, now that it's a CONTEST between the three (NONE of whom I get), I might actually start to learn something....

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

How could anyone think Hamburger's shtick was "real"? How dumb were the people listening? I mean, again, whether you think it was funny or not, wasn't that just obvious? How could it be anything BUT a parody?

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:02 (twenty-one years ago)

ex: during a relatively succesful run in England that was largely due to his political material - the press was much friendlier to him, the crowds were bigger, etc. - Hicks launched into an almost half-hour, totally indefensible, non-p.c. sexual fantasy centered around a pseudo-satanic character named "Goat Boy", involving anal rape of underage girls and all sorts of stuff. You can hear the gasps from the audience. He ends with his "I'm also available for children's parties" line. Also see: his many confrontations with redneck comedy audiences, getting in fights with audience members, chasing people out of the club, etc.

Hamburger's mode of confrontation was a little more subdued, more of a deliberate attempt to confuse the audience, rather than scare them.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

are you laughing yet chuck?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Seeing Neil has to be a well timed thing.. i've seen him twice. The first time was FAR FAR better, because he was opening for Trans Am.. this was at the Casbah, in San Diego.. probably one of the few towns who would actually go out and see Trans Am not "getting" that they do the power rock Journey bandana thing "ironically". Needless to say, Neil got a very large assault of boos that were NOT ironic, and well, being one of the guys who "got" Neil, that pleased me (and possible a few others in the audience) greatly.

Second time i saw Neil, he was headlining in Seattle. That unfortunately didn't work out as well, because every one in town knew his schtich and unfortunately stood there the whole time insincerely heckling Neil, which was extremely grating and embarrassing (for the audience and for me to be there enjoying it). Neil made up for it with his "song" and his movie title "shit" routine.

As to what this says about Neil? Well, admittedly, yeah, it's just one of those things where I could see not really caring unless you happened upon your Neil discovery (in my case, the "looking for laughs" 7" a decade ago.).

I'm more looking forward to what Turkington has planned moreso than what Neil Hamburger has planned... (not that the two could be uh be connected or anything, despite what the traitorsposters above might suggest)

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Meant to say "at the 'right' time" after my second to last paragraph.

So, um, to answer your question, Chuck, in regards to how dumb people could be to NOT get Neil.. um, come to San Diego during a Trans Am show, I guess.

(actually, scratch the Trans Am part)

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see why we have to defend/criticize people with audiences that required being "clued in" though. I thought that was one particular facet of humor in general that can get a lot of mileage in many applications. It's the degree and length to which this facet is used which is more arguable, I think.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"Mr. Show," Chuck. "Mr. Show." Have you seen it? Because if you've seen it and hate it, there will never be any convincing you that David Cross is talented (re: the stuff you asked, he has done a few pieces for the Onion that are done like "man on the street" things, where you see little pictures of him alongside his captions, and the Vice column is truly very funny, and has little to do with the tone of the rest of the mag)... but if you haven't seen it, please please do. I truly believe it's brilliant.

Ben Boyer (Ben Boyer), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Cross was much better as part of Mr. Show (which has nothing to do with stand-up but *lots* to do with playing with the idea of performances and audiences) than he is on his own. This is a science fact.

Actually over time I've come to think Bob Odenkirk is the funnier of the two, but maybe that's just because he's done less lame stuff than Cross has since the show ended.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

wrt: confrontation

i saw hamburger's first (i think?) american show (although a friend asked him to do his bachelor party about 7 years ago but after some thought he declined). it was at old ironsides in downtown sacramento ca. 99-00. about a year or some later, i saw him opening for laddio bolocko and then again a few months later with eXtreme Elvis and Canned Hamm.

obviously, i haven't seen him for a couple a years but i noticed some development over these shows about as significant as his evolution from the telephuck you/great phone calls era to the "america's funnyman" debut. (kindly note: i saw him in the bay area where he's probably most "popular" or at least known):

the hamburger routine has become much more vulgar (i'm thinking the rhcp/julia roberts gags) than the earlier ("what's the difference between an astronot and a resident of san francisco?") era. also, it would appear as he is trying to kill off hamburger as the comedy has taken a backseat to the coughing attacks.

he was never physically confrontational (esp. in comparison with eXtreme Elvis who pissed on the front row, threw a bottle at a guy's head, and then killed a chicken and threw it into the audience.) the show became more subversive, frustratingly so due to the knowingness of the audience (ref: donut bitch's dismissal of hecklers upthread).

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"astronot": sorry NOT A TYPO, punchline spoiler rather...

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, okay, I promise I won't respond to the "Bill Hicks upending political correctness with shocking-if-you're-a-goddamn-hippie-nun pigfuck bullshit" stuff by saying, "You mean like Howard Stern"?

See: I didn't! (Is that self control, or what?)

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Doug Stanhope's doin' the Man Show? That's depressing news. I only know him from a DVD of a live performance, which is ace.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck: Pretty sure Hicks pre-dates Stern, for what that's worth, and Stern is *much* stupider anyway. My point with that anecdote was that Hicks would go out of his way to "challenge" his audience no matter who they were. Hipsters, rednecks, tourists, industry folks, it made no difference. He would find the buttons and push them, usually really hard.

aaaaaaaaand the laffs just keep on comin...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Then again, I never thought GG Allin was "subversive," either.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, my "Why Harp Seal Killing is Good" editorial in my high school paper (West Bloomfield Michigan *Spectrum*, 1977) predates both Hicks AND Stern. And I don't see anybody calling ME a comic genius, dammit.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Which isn't to say Bill Hicks ISN'T a comic genius.

I just wanted to say "Harp Seal Killing is Good".

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hey, my "Why Harp Seal Killing is Good" editorial in my high school paper (West Bloomfield Michigan *Spectrum*, 1977) predates both Hicks AND Stern. And I don't see anybody calling ME a comic genius, dammit. "

Let me get Jonathan Swift's lawyers on the line... See chuck, now that you have no point to make and nothing to base your opinion on, seeing as how you admit to being unfamiliar with Hicks material, it's like you're just being argumentative.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Don Rickles to thread.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Nah, I'm just having fun. Some of what people are saying about these guys (the looking to push buttons of all possible audiences thing, for instance) makes them seem interesting; someother things (the let's go fuck little girls thing, for instance) makes them sound like morons doing something I've heard or seen three billion times before.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)

And right, I get that those two things are CONNECTED. But still.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, I LIKE when Jagger or Dylan or Iggy or Axl or Eminem or Michael Jackson confronts their audience, turns the tables, destroys passerby and all that. I've been known to do it myself in my writing now & then. In fact, there are those who'd say I've made a career (or schtick) out of it. It's often a GOOD thing. But hardly a NEW thing, and when the methods sound idiotic, my guess is that the person performing those methods might be an idiot as well. But perhaps not.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

trying to bring this home, i think neil hamburger's conceptual comedy is funniest to people who were lucky to hear his early material. Unfortunately his career is serial so those hearing him via the drag city releases are missing a lot of the earlier mystique and myth-making (which I'm pretty sure approaches clinical rockism as defined by ILM)... making much of the dismissal upthread is completely understandable.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

chuck, you're no neil hamburger.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)

which calls are trey spruance?

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)

he is "(don't lie to) the fat man"

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

So Gygax, are you saying Neil's gone *downhill* over the years? Or -- this is going to sound flippant, but I swear it's not -- is it more a matter of stoned college boys trading his records ten (or however many) years ago, thinking he was really really bad, and then realizing later that his joke was on them, and staying his fans, and now they're this record-collector cult afraid to admit when he starts to suck or fails to make them laugh as much as when the joke first sank in? THAT might make sense, maybe. (I mean, I notice Mr. Bungle and twits like that coming up a lot on this thread; aren't *their* fans mostly stoned college kids laughing at dumbass poop jokes?) It reminds me of Zappa's old audience or something. Or, I dunno, Ween's audience. Which might be why it all sounds so smug to me. But again, maybe I'm wrong. I've got a Bill Hicks CD at home that never did a damn thing for me; the one time I played a Neil Hamburger CD I was astounded by the extent that its real stupidity overshadowed its fake stupidity. But hey, if it makes people laugh, that's great. I guess.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)

hearing neil hamburger:

dj disk (who was then a member of Invisbl Skratch Pikklz) at the food not bombs benefit in dolores park threw great phone calls on and it was very funny (not to mention he is one of the better "turntablist"s in the world).

i saw buffalo daughter (all female post-rock/indie pop band from Japan) and they had a song which incorporated samples from "i'm in your band". it was very unexpected.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)

So Gygax, are you saying Neil's gone *downhill* over the years?

Honestly, Neil's playing clubs like the Improv (which is kind of like this standup comedy mecca in LA) as of last month so he's probably reached his goal of playing to mostly unaware audiences which is probably surreal and ideal for him. I don't think at this point he's gonna walk away from the $$$. As stated upthread, I haven't seen Neil perform in a few years but it seemed Neil was poised on a health emergency back then.

Or -- this is going to sound flippant, but I swear it's not -- is it more a matter of stoned college boys trading his records ten (or however many) years ago, thinking he was really really bad, and then realizing later that his joke was on them, and staying his fans, and now they're this record-collector cult afraid to admit when he starts to suck or fails to make them laugh as much as when the joke first sank in? THAT might make sense, maybe. (I mean, I notice Mr. Bungle and twits like that coming up a lot on this thread; aren't *their* fans mostly stoned college kids laughing at dumbass poop jokes?) It reminds me of Zappa's old audience or something. Or, I dunno, Ween's audience. Which might be why it all sounds so smug to me. But again, maybe I'm wrong.

Yeah, I'm not a fan of FNM, Mr. Bungle or Zappa so I can totally relate... Gregg used to live in SF with this guy named Trey who was a friend/bandmate of Mike Patton's. Gregg had this incredibly huge collection of obscure and forgotten records. He also had his own label that put out some very, very unusual records (take a peak at that amarillo records thread). Amarillo makes IPECAC look like Sarah Records. I'm very confident in assuming that the mr. bungle/faith no more connection was exploited as crassly as possible. gregg's taste in music was pretty far removed from your garden variety early 90s alternative rocker or zappa cultist... much more niche and unusual (now someone's gonna point out his career overview of the beegees on prindle).

I've got a Bill Hicks CD at home that never did a damn thing for me; the one time I played a Neil Hamburger CD I was astounded by the extent that its real stupidity overshadowed its fake stupidity. But hey, if it makes people laugh, that's great. I guess.

but to answer your first question: i said upthread that: A) his career is a serial, B) his first single is the funniest thing he's done, C)stepping into his career at this point is probably a little bizarre (in your words: "stupid").

I have to admit to you Chuck, I'm not good at telling people why they should like something. BUT if you walk away with anything from this thread: have someone make a copy of the first 7".

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:55 (twenty-one years ago)

But anyway, the title of this thread is "Now We Beat Up On Neil Hamburger", which hardly anybody seems to have been doing. So I was just trying to follow instructions. But now I'm gonna go home.

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, my fault for reviving it, it was the only neil hamburger thread in the archives.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to disagree on the topic of Mr. Show. About half the skits on each Mr. Show are total bombs, and on some episodes, all of them are. Cross's standup is 100x better.

David Allen, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Neil Hamburger? Made it look easy to go from opening for Caroliner to doing the Jimmy Kimmel show. Here's to you Neeeil Hamburger -- it's been a hell of a slide.

Awards Committee (Ian Christe), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)

About half the skits on each Mr. Show are total bombs, and on some episodes, all of them are.

I wouldn't go that far but I did definitely find most of what I've seen pretty damned tedious. Odenkirk worked better on Ben Stiller's show.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Also:

Hey, my "Why Harp Seal Killing is Good" editorial in my high school paper (West Bloomfield Michigan *Spectrum*, 1977) predates both Hicks AND Stern. And I don't see anybody calling ME a comic genius, dammit.
-- chuck (cedd...), November 11th, 2003.

You grew up in West Bloomfield? Did you go to West Bloomfield High?

David Allen, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)

MMMMMEEEEEEETTTAAAALLLLLLLLIIIIIICCCCAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!1


(ok thread fulfilled)

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:49 (twenty-one years ago)

beat you to that one, db :)

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 06:03 (twenty-one years ago)

METTTAAAALLLIIIIICCAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

http://www.angelfire.com/tn/avatarlair/images/riptaylor.jpg

IIIIT'S FUNNNYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Get on AIM you crazy DB

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 06:14 (twenty-one years ago)

>>You grew up in West Bloomfield? Did you go to West Bloomfield High?


For four years: 1974-78. Honest!

chuck, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
kalefah (sp?) sanneh (sp?) has a very good article about mr. hamburger (and standup comedy records) in general in today's NYT.

he points out -- correctly i think -- that neil hamburger works as a kind of defamiliarization device for standup comedy. that once all the devices a standup comic uses are bared so brazenly, it's hard to hear other comics again in the same way.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

er, not finished...

i think in that sense n.h. has a real value. although the "joke" does get old--in fact in his essay k.s. says he doesn't really like the new n.h. record (which apparently is light on the would-be funnies and heavy on the shaggy dog stories).

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

finding out that amateurist is a neil hamburger fan is my shock of the day!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

Neil Hamburger is at least funnier than david Cross!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

I love the one record of his I have, and feel no need to seek him out any further.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

and no, i wouldn't say hamburger is "funny" (he is funny, but it's a weird sort of funny) because he "makes fun" of bad stand up comics, although there is some of that. i think he's funny because he exposes some of the mechanics of stand up comedy, of comedy in general, by having them completely break down, often at length. i don't find this worthy of listening to more than once every few years, but i'm still glad it exists.

xpost

yeah, dr. bill, that's about how i feel. it's a really good schtick, but it's a limited schtick.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

i mean i guess this is how good comedy works, anyway--making the familiar seem strange and weird.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

and i agree with chuck that comedy can be analyzed like anything else, and without puncturing the humor value either. (well, if it does puncture the humor value, then that speaks poorly of the comedy, not the analysis.)

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

i don't think i've actually ever heard him! (is he like early steve martin?)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

i think comedy can DEF'LY be analyzed. hell if music can.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

he's sort of an anti-comedian. you should listen to him. i mean, i won't guarantee you'll "like" it but it's worth hearing.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

can DEF COMEDY JAM be "DEF"LY analyzed? get it? DEF COMEDY JAM?!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

also: i pretty much like everything! except some things.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)

http://www.levinson.com/bsc/analyze/images/analyze.gif

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

(l-r: me, amateurist)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 April 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

Now that I've seen Neil Hamburger sincerely piss off about several hundred teens at a Pinback show in the last few months, I must now declare THAT to be his best show ever. Neil is not even hiding his fake chronic coughing anymore, but is now just rubbing it in.

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

Q: Why does E.T. like the taste of Reece's Pieces?

A: Because the taste reminds him of the taste of cum on his home planet!

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

Q: Which popular singing group masturbates before each show, ejaculating at exactly the same moment?

A: N'Sync

space2k (space2k), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

Neil Hamburger is at least funnier than david Cross!

That's for damn sure. As the incidents quoted above indicate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

NYT writes:

Ever since, Hamburger has been building a small but ferocious cult of fans. He has released a string of albums on the indie-rock label Drag City and once managed to get himself booked on "Jimmy Kimmel Live," where he told perhaps the most tasteless Michael Jackson joke ever heard on network television. (Quite a feat.)


What was the joke? Did anyone see this appearance?

Matt Sab (Matt Sab), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

For what it's worth, I liked Kelefah's review a lot; it was exactly the kind of explanation I was looking for when I was spouting in all caps upthread. (Though I'm still not sure whether I'd think Neil Hamburger is funny, or even weird. I'm guessing, though, from what Kelefah wrote, that Neil would make me laugh more than Larry the Cable Guy. Though maybe not as much as Cledus T. Judd sometimes.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

“Why did Michael Jackson dangle his infant son over his hotel balcony? He was punishing him for refusing to finish his plate of sperm.”

space2k (space2k), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

do you ever sort of make a joke in public without thinking about it; like there was perhaps some kernel of humor there, but you didn't reflect on it for a second and just spouted it out and realized that it wasn't funny at all? like you realize what it is about the joke that would have made you thought it might have been funny, but it just was incontrovertible Not Funny? well most people have some kind of reflex that suppresses these jokes. i think neil hamburger is sort of "about" a guy who doesn't. have that reflex. it's like you can see the mechanics that should make the joke "funny," but it's not funny. which makes you question what it is that makes something truly funny.

i am being frightfully inarticulate.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

So anyway, I have a Bill Hicks question. I watched a special about him on Bravo a couple weeks ago (host: Janene Garafalo, apparently a fan), and the best thing I could say about him is that, okay, he had pretty decent politics. Not especially *funny* politics, near as I could tell, but whatever. But apparently he did less political stuff toward the end of his career. Does anybody think the anti-smoking-ban tirades (much dumber than Dennis Leary's same, though I realize Leary may have come later and improved on something Hicks started; who knows) and idiot "Goat Boy" perv shtick Hicks apparently evolved into toward the end were funny at all? Or do his fans basically think he'd started to suck by then? Because as iffy as the early stuff was, from what I could see (assuming the special was to be trusted, which maybe it shouldn't be), his later stuff just before he died was a lot worse.

xhuxk, Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

Re the last Amateurist post: There are characters on *The Office* (UK version) that totally crack me up with their inability to suppress such reflexes (and I've had a prejudice against British humor for years, too!). So I definitely get what you're talking about, though again, nothing I've heard by Hamburger made me think he pulled it off. Maybe I just haven't listened to the right things by him, though.

xhuxk, Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

i really tire of those comics who seem really agitated all the time. even the good ones. i think there's been too many poor imitators, and i've just tired of it.

p.s. it's not the same as hamburger, but i think andy kaufman was sort of an anti-comic by the end, too.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

of course a lot of the hamburger schtick doesn't even have to do with jokes per se, it's the spaces in between the jokes, and here he's not defamiliarizing humor so much as the very act of performance. which is something else that i find pretty interesting.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

Xhuckchchcuck, if you ever happen upon a paper case Amarillo compilation CD called You Gan't Boar Like An Eabla When You Work With Turkrys, the original Neil Hamburger track "Looking For Laughs" is on that.

Otherwise, Neil is just best seen live.. preferrably opening for other rock bands.

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

i like to imagine him at real comedy clubs in places like toledo or buffalo new york, though. rather than at indie rock clubs.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

http://15min.org/images/2004-02-25_c1.jpg

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)

Comedy Layhouse?

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)

Most appropriate.

his later stuff just before he died was a lot worse

The even later stuff after he died flat out sucked.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 28 April 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)

FWIW, Patton Oswalt is way better than anyone mentioned on this thread so far.

darin (darin), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

The even later stuff after he died flat out sucked.

a joke worthy of neil hamburger himself!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
Saw him last night - live, he gets genuine laughs; the jokes themselves (and that's what it was: about an hour of q-and-a style jokes) were really obscene and either really funny or induce-dead-silence (about 75%/25% ratio there and pretty clearly scripted that way), but the timing & the, umm, incidental noises were funniest of all - his chronic throat-clearing, and this sort of panicked whine/moan he makes not just in between jokes but in between lines, which really does an amazing job of evoking what minute-to-minute fear of failure is like. xChuckx seems to have mellowed in this thread about demanding "why's that funny?" but to me anyhow it seems like what's funny is that a really uncomfortable subject (failure: total failure, personal and professional) is being personified and paraded in a way you wouldn't actually see if it were real - people hide their failures rather than trumpeting them, right, but Neil Hamburger stands up in front of you and loudly, brazenly fails on purpose in a lot of different ways. On top of this, Turkington has such total confidence now, and his timing is so perfect (in the live setting at least), that it's a really overwhelming presentation of this whole schtick - the dead-silence moments didn't get uncomfortable, they contributed to the pacing. I was quite surprised, actually, at how hard I laughed throughout the night; I thought it'd be more like a theatrical performance piece, but the level of audience engagement was really high and the energy was great.

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 9 July 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

what's funny is that a really uncomfortable subject (failure: total failure, personal and professional) is being personified and paraded in a way you wouldn't actually see if it were real - people hide their failures rather than trumpeting them, right, but Neil Hamburger stands up in front of you and loudly, brazenly fails on purpose in a lot of different ways.

This sums up what I've found funny about the stray bits of Hamburger I've heard.

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 9 July 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

And as for Hicks and Cross, at their best it just reminds me of my friends getting together and ripping on stupid shit they've seen. Both can forget to make the self-satisfaction funny (Cross's second album is awful), and it can be incredibly obvious, but both of them, at their best, have a casual energy that makes their frustration, contempt or sardonic anger involving and conspiratorial. It's definitely not "a big deal" (especially if you can say "I do that in my book, so where's MY trophy?") and people who treat them like prophets are boneheaded, but it can be appealing for "like-minded hipsters" (a phrase I think Chuck threw out).

Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 9 July 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

The strange thing about Hamburger, to me, is the way in which, while he's playing a "bad stand-up comic", it's not at all clear what sort of bad stand-up comic his act is alluding to. Visually, he's doing a sort of Catskills thing, but the clearest influence on the actual content of his act are late-night-TV monologue jokes, with the added element of shock humor -- which is "genuine"? As Tallis says, his fans seem to enjoy many of the bits on some kind of legitimate level. (Not at all my kind of thing, but fair enough.)

Which I guess is why he infuriates me so much -- aside from the blatant cheapness of his jokes, there's a sense of inaccurate mockery to his act -- like he's making a stupid face, pointing at stand-up comics, and saying "this is you", when a) it's actually him, and b) it's not them. Or, rather, it has elements of (some of the worst of) them, but skewed in a way which makes it unfair and inaccurate even by the standards of bullying.

Not that I'd like him if he were an accurate bully, mind you -- but he probably wouldn't upset me quite as much as he does.

Though I guess the context in which he's presented matters? -- I've never seen him at rock concerts, only at comedy shows. Fairly "alternative" (I hate that word; it's so imprecise) shows at that; whatever criticisms can be leveled against the comics at those shows, Hamburger isn't making any of them. But he has a rabid -- almost cultish -- fan base, which tends to fill up many of the shows he's on. A lot of those guys are not there to see (and have no real appreciation for?) stand-up comedy; I've never been to a show where he's been there and the other comics (legitimately funny people who do well -- and deserve to do well -- on a regular basis) didn't struggle a lot more than they usually do.

But I guess that's it -- Hamburger's act seems to me very reductivist, very negative about the possibilities inherent in comedy, while at the same time exposing a naivete if not an outright ignorance concerning those possibilities. I mean, really? You're going to put this guy next to a Richard Pryor, or a Woody Allen, or a Louis CK, and act like he has anything to say to them? It's disrespect, mostly.

Pessimist (Pessimist), Sunday, 9 July 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

(btw: chabela burrito (sic: it's chabela mexican restaurant) is very, very good and inexpensive AND located two doors down from amoeba (which, at the time, was the rock and bowl)).

-- gygax! (gygax0...), November 10th, 2003 2:11 PM. (gygax!)

RIP dudes!

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 9 July 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

i saw the zip code rapists recently, it was pretty funny.

M@tt He1geson, Rendolent Ding-Dong (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 10 July 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

q: what's wet, sticky, and splattered...all over the coffin of deceased president ronald wilson reagan?

a: the tears of a nation.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Monday, 10 July 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

Having threads about Neil Hamburger on "I Love Music" (even to trash him) is playing by his game plan. It's not like anyone is going to complain about Carrot Top here? How about C/D comedians on "indie" music labels? The stuff I've heard by Hamburger (not much) has made me chuckle but I find standup comedy to be mostly crap.

Now Eugene Mirman (aka, in the words of the Onion," 'the indie rock comedian' who's opened for Modest Mouse, The Shins, and Yo La Tengo") is truly deserving of hatred.

Jacobo Rock (jacobo rock), Monday, 10 July 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

Having threads about Neil Hamburger on "I Love Music" (even to trash him) is playing by his game plan. I

is there anything wrong or shameful in "playing by his game plan"?

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Monday, 10 July 2006 19:21 (nineteen years ago)

zip code rapists are "music"

M@tt He1geson, Rendolent Ding-Dong (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 10 July 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

xpost - Thomas, Nothing wrong with it. I just think it's a bit odd. This whole "I don't do the stand-up comedy circuit, I do indie rock venues" thing intrinsically rubs me the wrong way. Not because I like stand-up. Probably just the opposite.

Jacobo Rock (jacobo rock), Monday, 10 July 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

What do customers ultimately buy after viewing items like this?
91% buy
Sonic Nurse ~ Sonic Youth $12.98
7% buy
Great Phone Calls Featuring Neil Hamburger ~ Neil Hamburger $16.98
3% buy the item featured on this page:
Raw Hamburger ~ Neil Hamburger $15.98

Marmot 4-Tay: You are beautiful, and you are alone. (marmotwolof), Monday, 10 July 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

zip code rapists are "music"
-- M@tt He1geson, Rendolent Ding-Dong (matt@game[remove]informer.com), Today 1:22 PM.

neil hamburger /= zip code rapists

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 10 July 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
In this story about Tom Green's net show:

Although most of his viewers tune in through ManiaTV, Green is enlisting friends such as red-carpet interviewer Melissa Rivers and comedian Neil Hamburger to host their own live shows, which he plans to broadcast on TomGreen.com.

Oh my.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 24 September 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

i saw neil hamburger once. i'd never heard, and still haven't heard, and of his cd's. he opened by coughing loudly into the mic and saying, first words out of his mouth, "how am i doing for time?" that won me completely over and he owned me for the night. i never saw any need to hear any of this on record, but it was a damn entertaining night out.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 25 September 2006 06:16 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdU3RIcTg6M

am0n, Monday, 17 December 2007 17:29 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

http://twitpic.com/26pik9

del griffith, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

three months pass...

Neil_Hamburger

Drunk? RT @paulaabdul: OMG you guys wanna know what I'm gonna be for Halloween?

about 18 minutes ago

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 30 October 2010 06:17 (fourteen years ago)

Hero.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 30 October 2010 06:46 (fourteen years ago)

I heard he was forced to end his set early at the Reading Festival "for his own personal safety."

Maltodextrin, Saturday, 30 October 2010 15:51 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdlnkgOa8Ic

"pig people"

like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Saturday, 30 October 2010 16:24 (fourteen years ago)

Sterling work by the patrons of Reading Festival singing "you're shit and you know you are" at Neil, this being the entire premise of his act

I can't wait to get home and climb aboard... GROCERY GROIN (DJ Mencap), Saturday, 30 October 2010 17:12 (fourteen years ago)

one month passes...

http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/shaky-advice-from-neil-hamburger/id409059508?mt=8

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:06 (fourteen years ago)

ten months pass...

his twitter feed is really something. he had a lot of Britney Spears fans riled up for a good while

frogbs, Wednesday, 2 November 2011 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

i love the AXE-baiting (they deserve it) but i kind of wish he'd pick some new targets every once in awhile

vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Wednesday, 2 November 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

check out the "On Cinema" podcasts with Tim Heidecker if you haven't already.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 2 November 2011 22:15 (thirteen years ago)

the fact that he always has the same 4 tired subjects is what makes it extra funny

Youth Ya Goon (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 2 November 2011 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

YES. i've been reading these incessantly for the past few days. love when he blends his vitriol with self-deprecation.

example:
I used it as a blanket. @Brillo: Did you see our ad featuring Brillo products in your Sunday newspaper this weekend? RT if you did!

obster lob, Wednesday, 2 November 2011 23:46 (thirteen years ago)

seven months pass...

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t297/albrislin/5-4-2007-10.jpg

am0n, Friday, 15 June 2012 20:14 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.