Produced by Steve Albini, out in May, featuring Richey Edwards' lyrics and using the same cover artist as The Holy Bible.
Oh, and this is supposed to be the tracklist:
1. No2. Friends With Black People3. Doors Slowly Closing4. She Bathed Herself In A Bath Of Bleach5. Library Of Disorder6. Jesus And Mohammed Having Sex In A Vat Of Knives7. Peeled Apples8. Carrion (Featuring Sylvia Plath)9. Me And Stephen Hawking10. Tomorrow Is A Degraded Expanse11. Facing Page Top Left12. Jackie Collins' Existential Question Time13. William's Last Words (Final Result Of The Battle Of The Cripples)
Thus making it a successor to ILM's 5th-favorite record of the 90s.
― Simon H., Saturday, 21 March 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
richey finally earning all them royalties
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Saturday, 21 March 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)
Aha! So this is the side the butter's on!
― Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Saturday, 21 March 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)
Heavy LOL
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 21 March 2009 04:31 (sixteen years ago)
2. Friends With Black People6. Jesus And Mohammed Having Sex In A Vat Of Knives9. Me And Stephen Hawking12. Jackie Collins' Existential Question Time
holy shit richey james is alive and lurking on ilx
― Blancmange Is Playing At My House (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 21 March 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)
Seriously: would download tracks two and six for the titles only.
The weird thing is that thy're obviously trying to replicate Richey-era edginess, except that Bible kept all the weirdness in the lyrics and had nice succinct song titles, whereas this comes off like a poor attempt at Mclusky-style humor. Still, I'm curious about the record as I have come around on most of Send Away the Tigers.
― Simon H., Saturday, 21 March 2009 05:02 (sixteen years ago)
I bet track 2 will be my new favorite song ever!
― Morley Timmons, Saturday, 21 March 2009 07:04 (sixteen years ago)
Oh come on, not only is it totally lacking in subtlety, it's a week and a half earl...
y...
oh jesus it's real IT'S REAL
This is going to be awful, isn't it?
― Telephone thing, Saturday, 21 March 2009 07:32 (sixteen years ago)
you just stop it right there!
― Morley Timmons, Saturday, 21 March 2009 07:33 (sixteen years ago)
This not real btw.
― Eyeball Kicks, Saturday, 21 March 2009 10:46 (sixteen years ago)
Hilarious.
― krakow, Saturday, 21 March 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
The tracklist as a whole might be fake, but several of these titles have been mentioned in Mojo and NME.
― Simon H., Sunday, 22 March 2009 07:08 (sixteen years ago)
It's true! But I bet "Friends with Black People" is still not one of them :(
― Morley Timmons, Sunday, 22 March 2009 07:54 (sixteen years ago)
The song 'Journal for Plague Lovers' is a total steal of 'Spirit Of Radio'.
― stirmonster, Sunday, 22 March 2009 19:13 (sixteen years ago)
Would actually buy this album on phyisical CD if it turned out to actually be real.
― Matt DC, Monday, 23 March 2009 00:17 (sixteen years ago)
No 'Friends with Black People' :(
Peeled ApplesJackie Collins Existential Question TimeMe and Stephen HawkingThis Joke Sport SeveredJournal For Plague LoversShe Bathed Herself In A Bath Of BleachFacing Page: Top LeftMarlon J.D.Doors Closing SlowlyAll Is VanityPretension/RepulsionVirginia State Epileptic ColonyWilliam’s Last Words
http://www.newmusicfriday.com/newsletter/newsletter4347/Album-200.jpg
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
except that Bible kept all the weirdness in the lyrics and had nice succinct song titles
"Yes" – 4:59 "Ifwhiteamericatoldthetruthforonedayit'sworldwouldfallapart" – 3:39 "Of Walking Abortion" – 4:01
― Mark G, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
okay, except that one.
I'm disappointed in the new tracklist, by comparison.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 24 March 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
Does anyone think it is possible that this could be any good? It won't be, will it?
― Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
It's not, for me, about if it's going to be any good or not.
It's about themnot being that band with Richey in it, or just out of it.
Now they are older, more considered, and dare I say it, maturer.
Richey's lyrics can't have moved on in the same way.
It might be brilliant stuff! But there's still a danger that they turn into their own "tribute act" for a version of the band froma parallel universe, of 15 years ago.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I mean, I'd include all that in working out whether it could actually be good or not. As you say, it's a bit tribute-acty, or like the famous kids of more famous dead parents who do posthumous duets. (I guess it's even more like "Free as a bird" or "Real Love", and it seems irrelevant whether those songs are good or not - I can't imagine wanting to listen to them for pleasure, they're just novelties.) They must have considered that this would seem cynical/desperate, and feel comfortable that they're not doing it for these reasons, but it's odd. I don't know how sure people can be of their own motives in these situations. And they can't seriously have some banal idea that it's "what Richey would have wanted" because by his own actions, whatever they were, he made it perfectly clear that he didn't want to be involved in anything of this sort, or any sort, ever again.
― Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 24 March 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
um. huh. i have nothing to say about this at all.
― he sounded italian enough to give me something (the schef (adam schefter ha ha)), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 21:45 (sixteen years ago)
you will buy it though.
― Pfunkboy in blood drenched rabbit suit jamming in the woods (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno, they apparently did a whole album which i completely missed, looking at amazon just now. i probably will get it, on itunes, out of curiosity though.
― he sounded italian enough to give me something (the schef (adam schefter ha ha)), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)
It's quite good actually. It got some votes in this poll MANIC STREET PREACHERS Best Album Poll
― Pfunkboy in blood drenched rabbit suit jamming in the woods (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 24 March 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
The opening track is kicking around - surprisingly catchy and economical. The Albini "production" suits the material.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 March 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
I'm really liking "Peeled Apples" a lot more than I thought I would - The kick into the chorus is epic. Really looking forward to this now.
― ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUBS WHATSOEVER, Thursday, 26 March 2009 05:14 (sixteen years ago)
nice Jenny Saville cover
― Morley Timmons, Thursday, 26 March 2009 07:15 (sixteen years ago)
― ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUBS WHATSOEVER, Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:44 (sixteen years ago)
So this is around. And pretty good! I do miss the fake tracklist though. :(
The Wire-sung "William's Last Words" works surprisingly well.
― Simon H., Tuesday, 28 April 2009 04:17 (sixteen years ago)
Really liking this - the transition in the middle of "this joke sport severed" is massive on loud headphones.
― ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUBS WHATSOEVER, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8050110.stmThe new Manic Street Preachers album is being shipped to supermarkets in a plain slipcase because its artwork has been deemed "inappropriate".
Concerns have been raised that the cover for Journal For Plague Lovers, a portrait by artist Jenny Saville, looks like it is splattered with blood.
Singer James Dean Bradfield called the situation "utterly bizarre".
"We just thought it was a beautiful painting. We were all in total agreement," he told BBC 6 Music.
The frontman disagreed that Saatchi favourite Powell, who also painted the cover for the band's 1994 album The Holy Bible, had intended to depict a bloody face.
"It is her brushwork," he said.
"If you're familiar with her work, there's a lot of ochres and browns and reds and browns and perhaps people are looking for us to be more provocative than we are being.
"We just saw a much more modern version of Lucian Freud-esque brushstrokes. That's all we saw."
Bradfield added that the band were frustrated by supermarkets' attitudes.
"You can have lovely shiny buttocks and guns everywhere in the supermarket on covers of magazines and CDs, but you show a piece of art and people just freak out," he said.
Four of the main supermarket chains - Sainsburys, Tesco, Asda and Morrisons - are among the shops using the slip cover.
Asda told 6 Music they wanted to be extra cautious in case the artwork upset some of its customers.
Meanwhile Nicola Williamson, Sainsbury's music buyer, said: "We felt that some customers might consider this particular album cover to be inappropriate if it were prominently displayed on the shelf.
"As such, the album will be sold in a sleeve provided by the publisher."
Journal For Plague Lovers, the Welsh band's ninth studio album, sees them set the lyrics of former band member Richey Edwards to music, 14 years after the 27-year-old disappeared from the Embassy Hotel in London's Bayswater.
Bradfield says that the artwork was an integral part of the project and, for that reason, the band had never considered revising it.
"It's the first time ever that we actually feel controlled by the idea, which basically stemmed from Richey's words," he explained.
"So we're not going to censor it or anything, because it is what it is.
"It is bizarre that supermarkets actually think that that's going to impinge on anyone's psyche."
Journal For Plague Lovers is released in the UK on Monday.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 14 May 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
that is ridiculous. I am still listening to this regularly - a few tracks I'm not too crazy about but still their best since at least This Is My Truth, if not longer.
― Simon H., Thursday, 14 May 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)
So any new thoughts on this? I haven't gotten it yet, but "The Holy Bible" is one of my favorite albums of all time, and this was supposed to be a 'return to form' (something that is said upon the release of every album).
― Jesus Christ, Attorney at Law (res), Thursday, 11 June 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
Its very good, yes. Nowhere near as good as THB or the 1st two obviously but it's their best album since EMG.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:04 (sixteen years ago)
Hm. I actually don't care for the first two that much (a few songs excepted). I only really like the three that followed. Everything else has left me kind of cold. Maybe I will check this one out. It's gotten a lot of positive press, which seems to be rare for these guys nowadays.
― Jesus Christ, Attorney at Law (res), Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:08 (sixteen years ago)
"Jackie Collins' Existential Question Time" suuuuuuuucks
― man saves ducklings from (ledge), Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
Only anticipating the Underworld and St. Etienne mixes and praying they are instrumental or are at least promo'd with instrumental mixes. This project is foul. If New Order were to record songs using lyrics from Ian Curtis' notebooks i'd be horrified.
― brotherlovesdub, Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
they should have a song called "Rock'n'Roll Propriety"
― Jesus Christ, Attorney at Law (res), Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
If Ian Curtis had given them a notebook, having made clear they were lyrics to be used for songs, wouldn't that be fair game?
― Simon H., Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
what tracks are being underworld'd and saint etienne'd?
isn't there a saint etienne track where bob, pete and sarah are talking about the manics? maybe some mumbling in "avenue" or something?
― djh, Thursday, 11 June 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
Saint Etienne remixed There By the Grace of God previously. Here's the cut n paste from the Manic press release.
Each track from Journal For Plague Lovers has been remixed and will be released as a digital EP on June 15th. The band hand-picked an impressive selection of remixers:
"It's been a pretty overwhelming response to be honest. We chose people for each track hoping they would bring us back something unique, that they'd find something we maybe hadn't in the track. Without fail, they've done that. Heartfelt thanks from us to everyone involved". - Nicky
The EP boasts the following artists and track remixes:
Andrew Weatherall - Peeled Apples Saint Etienne - Jackie Collins Existential Question Time British Sea Power - Me And Stephen Hawking Patrick Wolf - This Joke Sport Severed Optimo (Espacio) - Journal For Plague Lovers The Pariahs - She Bathed Herself In A Bath Of Bleach Adem - Facing Page Top Left New Young Pony Club - Marlon JD The Horrors - Doors Closing Slowly Errors - All Is Vanity Four Tet - Pretension/Repulsion Fuck Buttons - Virginia State Epileptic Colony Underworld - William's Last Words Jonathan Krisp - Bag Lady
― brotherlovesdub, Thursday, 11 June 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=733
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 11 June 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
I just got this. I'm not really feeling it so far, unfortunately. It seems a little forced, but perhaps it will grow on me.
― Jesus Christ, Attorney at Law (res), Wednesday, 17 June 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)
This record grew on me and now it's certainly one of my favorites of the year. Their best since Know Your Enemy, which to me is practically unbeatable (I know I'm in the minority there). This band is completely obscure in America which is strange because we like big anthemic stadium rock and they're so good at it.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
The remixes are popping up here and there, including the Underworld one, which is amazing:
http://www.spinner.ca/2009/09/15/manic-street-preachers-williams-last-words-underworld-remix/
― Simon H., Friday, 18 September 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
And hey, the Fuck Buttons one isn't bad either:
http://stereogum.com/archives/mp3/fuck-buttons-remix-manic-street-preachers-stereogum-premiere_088251.html
― Simon H., Friday, 18 September 2009 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
This finally came out in the States, or at least finally became regularly available. Picked it up yesterday and it comes with a free download card for 10 remixes.
― Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 18 September 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)
For some reason the fantastic Adem remix isn't on the 10-track remix release, and the awful Horrors one is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1PEpFpU1ec
― Simon H., Friday, 18 September 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
actually, now that I've heard all 14 remixes, I think a well-sequenced version of them (well, taking out the negligible Horrors and British Sea Power ones) would rival the quality of the original record!
― Simon H., Saturday, 19 September 2009 08:51 (sixteen years ago)
I am seeing them Monday!!!!!! and all the Seattle ILXors are sick of hearing about it :)
― Morley Timmons, Sunday, 20 September 2009 07:53 (sixteen years ago)
the remix package is pretty great, the saint etienne, fuck buttons & weatherall remixes are the stand outs imo.
― ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUBS WHATSOEVER, Sunday, 20 September 2009 10:32 (sixteen years ago)
spotify:album:3doPalwBWAITMK1gA8La2a
all 14 trax there fer nowt.
love the saint etienne cover.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)
i was looking forwards to crackers saying "fucks a catholic" though :/
― ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUBS WHATSOEVER, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
This record is so good. My favorite release of 2009.
What I want to know is, how could they be so obscure in America. Last week they played their first NYC show in ten years at Webster Hall, a venue that holds 2,500. They didn't sell it out. They headline arenas in Europe, right?
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)
They can't have played venues much bigger than 2,500 on their last few UK tours.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 03:59 (sixteen years ago)
They are pretty big in the UK though - Journal For Plague Lovers hit #3 in the UK album charts and they would generally be a front-page in the music press kind of a band that (almost) everyone had heard of. Too sixth-form cerebral for the US, mebbe?
― krakow, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 07:32 (sixteen years ago)
too specifically English for the U.S. imo - the anglophile population among music fiends in the US has been on the decline for two decades, really never recovered after the mid-eighties (huge peak for all-things-British luv on the west coast anyway). figuring out what the Manics are so mad about would take some effort & I think the consensus about "Holy Bible" was "somebody really loved a Nirvana record, eh?"
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 08:54 (sixteen years ago)
But we love our stadium sized anthems, and they're one of the best at it. At the very least, someone with big pipes should cover A Design For Life on American Idol.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
no ffs no! dont!
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
I'm sure they'd love being described as "too specifically English"
― The Prince's choice: making a brush. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:31 (sixteen years ago)
Their politics are a bit confusing to put it mildly, but they have a way with a hook. My favorite has always been Know Your Enemy, which seems to be hated by the fans for reasons I cannot explain. But the new one is rapidly catching up. Oddly enough, I never quite understood the fuss over The Holy Bible, apart from Yes it seems kinda overwrought.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)
They'd have to change the "we only want to get drunk" line though.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:53 (sixteen years ago)
Know Your Enemy was seen as a return to form and is better than the couple after it.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)
Not if the person singing it is a Bo Bician-style rocker.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
"We only want to get drunk, isn't it?"
― The Prince's choice: making a brush. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
I think the consensus about "Holy Bible" was "somebody really loved a Nirvana record, eh?
I thought that angsty, Nirvana wanabees were the marquee acts in the US in '94.
― go in go hard brother (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, but they were obviously better at it than the Manics
― The Prince's choice: making a brush. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)
Grunge isn't really their thing. They're best at U2-style arena rockers with big choruses.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:09 (sixteen years ago)
I generally think UK rock bands fail in the US through inability to rock sufficiently or convincingly
― The Prince's choice: making a brush. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:10 (sixteen years ago)
and not being American
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:13 (sixteen years ago)
Still don't understand why they never broke through in the US. I'd never expect them to be Smashing Pumpkins/RATM style huge but would have expected them to be breaking into the top 40 albums without too much trouble. Then again I never understood why the Stranglers didn't cross over in the US either and they could certainly rock, at least live anyway.
― go in go hard brother (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
Too androgynous pre-Holy Bible, too abrasive during Holy Bible, too reflective post-Holy Bible.
― Neil S, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:21 (sixteen years ago)
US radio is very conservative, and there's almost zero chance of a song called "If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next" ever catching on in the US. But they have plenty of others that shoulda been hits.
In the UK, what is their biggest song?
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)
design for lifeamongst fans Motorcycle Emptiness
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
tbh I think their melodies are just not the sort of things Americans like - "If You Tolerate This" for example, that mid-tempo rock bombast with a to my american ears really lounge-y vocal style - it never quite seems to click, and that wistful melodic quality up against that line - hard to make them sync. I get into it myself but it always sounds confused about what it's trying to be, to me. wants it both ways: pissed-off 'n' youthful plus stadium-huge & ready for the spotlight. Also, a lot of the time it's really hard to understand both what dude is saying and what he's talking about even when you can understand the words so I don't think it's timid radio programmers/audiences
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
Also, a lot of the time it's really hard to understand both what dude is saying and what he's talking about even when you can understand the words
LOL, the great communicators
― The Prince's choice: making a brush. (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
The strangeness of JDB's delivery and the density of the lyrics are two things I love about them. I can quite understand why US radio wouldn't touch them but I'm surprised they never found a cult following of people who would find the opaqueness intriguing. I seem to remember Greil Marcus was a Know Your Enemy fan - he's the kind of person who would go for this off-kilter, ideas-stuffed approach. I reviewed the reissue of The Holy Bible for Blender, trying to pitch it as a weird cult masterpiece to a readership who would mostly go "Who?"
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
Greil Marcus was a Know Your Enemy fan
Yes. He raved about that album, particulary Epicentre, which is one of their best shoulda-been-hits. I think this band would definitely appeal to Americans who are into albums like The Bends or the last few U2 records. If I were a radio programmer, I'd put There By The Grace of God, A Design For Life and The Year of Purification on heavy rotation. They've got such a weird backstory, too.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
I don't feel like they ever really tried to break them in America. I mean, my Anglophile self read about them all the damn time in my school's library copies of NME and Melody Maker, but I couldn't ever find their albums anywhere (granted this was middle of nowhere central Illinois). Anyway, the first thing I was able to buy them was a $30 import copy of Everything Must Go when it first came out. Seems like much of the stuff later came out domestically later on. Point being, I don't feel like they were really ever given the chance to break in America.
― & other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
Have I mentioned on this thread that Underworld's mix/cover of William's Last Words is about a kazillion times better than the original?
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
Not only do I think this is a really good album (though my sentimental favorite remains Gold Against the Soul), but the combination of the album proper, the complete demo version, and the complete remix version, is really incredible. Listen to them back-to-back-to-back, demo then studio then remix, and it's like a musical Neal Stephenson novel.
― glenn mcdonald, Friday, 16 October 2009 22:46 (sixteen years ago)
honestly i bought that holy bible record once and i really fail to see what all the fuss was about
i had it built up like OMGITSOFUCKINGINTENSEANDROCKINGANDANGRY and i was like um...really doe? sound like U2 heard a few mid-90s touch & go bands...i dunno...like with all the shit going on in US underground rock back then i couldn't really feel it. seemed kinda weak to me...and the lyrics were pretty retarded if i recall, not that that kept me from liking tons of other retarded lyrics bands
― headroom (max) (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 16 October 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)
i mean they didn't even kick up as much as, say, archers of loaf who i kinda considered an indie pop band in a lot of ways, let alone like jesus lizard or am rep shit
― headroom (max) (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 16 October 2009 22:55 (sixteen years ago)
i always liked these dudes, which i guess makes sense considering i'm a U2 fan. i can see why they're not big here, i mean their rock tracks don't really "rock" in the way that would be successful here and they're not anthemic or soaring enough to get into U2 or coldplay territory; everything they do falls somewhere in between.
― access flap (omar little), Friday, 16 October 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)
i sort of wish i could re-hear it for the first time after a memory wipe of all the hyperbole surrounding it. it's probably a totally decent major label rock record....like i bet i could like it as much as later queens of the stone age or the first foo fighters record
― headroom (max) (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 16 October 2009 23:02 (sixteen years ago)
I am not crazy about The Holy Bible either, apart from Yes. Know Your Enemy and the new one are both much better rock records, in my humble opinion. As for the soaring/rocking, at their best they can outsoar Coldplay any day of the week, and they can outrock U2.
I'm not saying they can sell out arenas here, but they can certainly be more well known than they are.
― kornrulez6969, Saturday, 17 October 2009 01:56 (sixteen years ago)
So, the new album is almost upon us...
What are people thinking?
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51EeOl01tIL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
The first single is out there now...
Also, should we start a new thread?
― krakow, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
'Journal For Plague Lovers' totally reinvigorated my love for the Manics, but I'm aware of how different this new album is meant to be, so I'm feeling pretty wary.
― krakow, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)
I have low expectations after what I've read about it.
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
Journal For Plague Lovers was my favorite album of 2009, and probably my favorite album they ever did.
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
If the Manics were ever to be big in the US, it was the first two, particularly the first album. That production, the riffs, his vocals. Plenty of post-Def Lep/Appetite sheen, which is basically the band they were. Only thing I can think of that is the the wordiness of the verses and, I don't know, is 1992 too late for all that stuff?
― Master of Treacle, Wednesday, 4 August 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
Should I get Plague Lovers? Is it as Albini-intense as the tracklisting suggests?
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 11:03 (fifteen years ago)
its terrific
― pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
Thought it was a big letdown after all the hype, and one nicky sung track is cringe-a-matic. I only listened to the album twice.
― reallysmoothmusic (Jamie_ATP), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
Outside of the opening tracks and the hidden track, it's not very Albini...ey. Dave Enriga's mixing seems to gloss over a lot of the grit. But the songs are their best in ages.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 4 August 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
opening track*
― Simon H., Wednesday, 4 August 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
Rewind The Film - I love it! If I had more educative opening comments to make I would start a new thread for the album.
― NWOFHM! Overlord (krakow), Sunday, 15 September 2013 15:37 (twelve years ago)
I've given Rewind the Film another chance and I'm glad I did - not as stilted or awkward as I first thought. It occurs to me that, for a long time now, every new Manics record has felt like a reaction to/against the one that came before, but never in quite the same way. It's like a deliberate strategy they use to avoid complacency. At any rate, I admire their desire to really experiment: there's an instrumental, two duets, a track sung entirely by Cate Le Bon, one that sounds vaguely influenced by that Four Tet remix, and no electric guitars (but lots of everything else). It's much more compelling to me than Postcards (which I didn't hate).
― Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2014 03:14 (eleven years ago)
I wasn't sure about Rewind when I first heard it but it became one of my favourite albums of last year - a record which squarely confronts feeling middle age in a way I haven't heard before. Looking forward to the next one too. I much prefer them when they're taking a bold stand in a particular direction to when they're doing straight-ahead anthemic rock.
― What is wrong with songs? Absolutely nothing. Songs are great. (DL), Wednesday, 19 March 2014 04:33 (eleven years ago)
I'm surprised at how palatable Wire's lyrics are here for the most part, mostly thanks to the direct approach. There's a no-bullshit quality to a line like "how I hate middle age / in between acceptance and rage" that suits them.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2014 13:51 (eleven years ago)
I love the use of guest vocalists. With that and the absence of guitar solos except on one track it's impressively egoless work by James - more than any previous album it's all about creating the right setting for the lyrics, not his role as frontman. And the sequencing is very smart: Manorbier and 30 Year War suggest a bouncing back from despair, first through serenity and then through anger.
― What is wrong with songs? Absolutely nothing. Songs are great. (DL), Wednesday, 19 March 2014 14:11 (eleven years ago)
I guess it's my duty to kick this thread every time there's a new Manics record. Futurology isn't as compelling to me as Rewind, but it is endearingly weird. Even more guest vocalists, and stranger ones to boot (Nina Hoss in particular is fantastic), two instrumentals, and a lot of rhythm tracks that make it seem like they've been listening to the remixes of their own tracks a lot. Wire embarrasses himself again a few times, but not at Know Your Enemy levels; he's helped along quite a bit by his newfound self-incriminating streak ("So you played in Cuba, did you like it, brother? / I bet you felt proud, you silly little fucker..."). Not an unqualified winner, but far from lazy.
― Simon H., Thursday, 7 August 2014 03:40 (eleven years ago)
i haven't listened to this yet but i absolutely will just because green gartside is on it
― emo canon in twee major (BradNelson), Thursday, 7 August 2014 05:45 (eleven years ago)
The Green Gartside track is the best thing they've done in ages.
― michaellambert, Thursday, 7 August 2014 08:53 (eleven years ago)
James wrote the lyrics to The Next Jet To Leave Moscow btw.
― PaulTMA, Thursday, 7 August 2014 10:03 (eleven years ago)
the Quietus review srves as a handy guide to the many references I'd never have picked up on.
― Simon H., Thursday, 7 August 2014 13:28 (eleven years ago)
Looks like we might have a new album as soon as tomorrow, ’The Ultra Vivid Lament’.
The trailer for it is pretty cool and there's some promising sounding song snippets in there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2HrqFsz14
― brain (krakow), Thursday, 13 May 2021 22:53 (four years ago)
another perfectly manics album title
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Thursday, 13 May 2021 23:21 (four years ago)
Sorry, I was tired last night and thought they were going for a "here's our new album" style immediate release, but it's more traditional - out September 3rd. Track titles are also perfectly manics. Intrigued to see Mark Lanegan guesting.
Manic Street Preachers' 14th studio album ‘The Ultra Vivid Lament’
1. Still Snowing in Sapporo2. Orwellian3. The Secret He Had Missed (Feat. Julia Cumming)4. Quest for Ancient Colour5. Don’t Let the Night Divide Us6. Diapause7. Complicated illusions8. Into the Waves of Love9. Blank Diary Entry (Feat. Mark Lanegan)10. Happy Bored Alone11. Afterending
Just going to give Orwellian a listen. What do you reckon Simon H.?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smImSentyaI
― brain (krakow), Friday, 14 May 2021 10:06 (four years ago)
mark lanegan once again truly set on working with every single band goddamn
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Friday, 14 May 2021 11:10 (four years ago)
I like this song a lot! can't think of another band less suited to a lyric video though lol, I looked away immediately
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Friday, 14 May 2021 11:12 (four years ago)
Yeah, I like it a lot too! It's got a pretty anthemic feel at points, but isn't too much, and musically & vocally they seem on good form - JDB's voice sounds good, there's some nice guitar work and I like a few of Nicky's wee bass lines. No lyrical winces on this one either, though the title is almost too manics.
― brain (krakow), Friday, 14 May 2021 11:57 (four years ago)
Lol @ the Manics agonising about picking a side in the culture war. What pathetic melts they’ve become. pic.twitter.com/uXMt5c3lqE— Tom Williams (@shirleymush) May 19, 2021
ok how did they end up here lmao
― ufo, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 19:48 (four years ago)
i guess they said a lot of weird stuff about corbyn last decade, i hadn't been paying attention
― ufo, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 19:54 (four years ago)
they have always agonized about seeming politically independent idk
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Wednesday, 19 May 2021 20:23 (four years ago)
people on that twitter thread calling them melts - they are more like One Nation tories!
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 20:40 (four years ago)
I never liked them tbh, especially that hideous spud of vocalist, but recently I noticed that Richey was very otm about how shit the Labour Was in the 90's - even before the advent of Blairism.
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 20:43 (four years ago)
Party
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 20:44 (four years ago)
they've always mainly struck me as being cranky idealists above all else, it's not like they're out there saying nice things about kieth
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Wednesday, 19 May 2021 20:52 (four years ago)
I think they try and project in their songs some kind of muddled idealism that sort of reminds me of that awful Ken Loach 1945 fetishism in some ways, but I don't think they really are idealists of any stripe - they are just trynna sound deep innit, in a sort of bullshit Dunty/Lynskey mode.
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:00 (four years ago)
unfortunately by britpop era rock star standards they are basically ultraleft
― intern at pelican brief consulting (Simon H.), Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:07 (four years ago)
Muted him for his use of 'melt'
― PaulTMA, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:22 (four years ago)
the corbyn comments were like, dismissive of him as an "old school communist who hates the EU" and then i went digging further and found stuff from 2006 where they talked about how michael foot was still their political idol but he was futile trying to win an election from the left, the corbyn wing of the party is too idealist (back in 2006 when it barely existed) and blair is bad but they were hopeful maybe people like ed miliband would improve labor in the future
idk just depressing for a band who were so proudly radical at one point (even if not always the most coherently) to have ended up where they are now (and have been for ages i guess)
― ufo, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:31 (four years ago)
anyone who talks about the futility of Michael Foot without reference to both of the Falklands war and the internal backstabbers of the SDP, isn't worth taking seriously.
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:39 (four years ago)
the Labour Party under Foot literally was 18-20 points ahead of the Thatcher govt before the establishment hatchet job and the war. Just blithely dismissing this as predictable and futile is the language and political currency of the melts tbf!
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 21:57 (four years ago)
The early Manic Street Preachers had weird and contrary (and interesting) (and stupid) positions with Richey Manic, but Nicky Manic has never stood for anything more than pretty much what Jimmy McGovern or the like says, right? Probably less. Doesn't make him a terrible person – I know plenty of good people on exactly that line – but who gives a fuck.
― Eyeball Kicks, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 23:30 (four years ago)
I could never quite bring myself to vote for Jimmy McGovern!
― calzino, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 23:40 (four years ago)
it's pretty rare that anyone from rock bands says anything interesting tbh, but compared to the rest of the grim troglodytes in this band Richey was giving a Perry Anderson level of insight into the problems with Labour in that old NME interview I saw last week.
― calzino, Thursday, 20 May 2021 00:10 (four years ago)
bark at the moon and have a few wee whiskeys?
― PaulTMA, Saturday, 22 May 2021 00:06 (four years ago)
oh look it's the Morrissey apologist shit-talking again!
― calzino, Saturday, 22 May 2021 00:12 (four years ago)
cannae read em capatinhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOzePXpgVx8
― PaulTMA, Saturday, 22 May 2021 00:25 (four years ago)
looked on RYM to see what people were saying about the new Manic Street Preachers single and laughed at this pic.twitter.com/iEYb6MIDWx— tom (@malaiseforever) May 21, 2021
― calzino, Saturday, 22 May 2021 01:00 (four years ago)