http://pitchfork-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/media/p2k/decade-headers/haag-centered.gif
As one of ILM's resident indie kids who regularly posts about Pitchfork, I feel it is my duty to begin this thread.
Pitchfork have just announced that they'll be posting a bunch of end-of-the-decade stuff starting August 17 and going to October 2: http://pitchfork.com/news/36153-presenting-p2k-the-decade-in-music/ . They're calling the whole thing "P2k: The Decade in Music."
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
I wish people would wait until the year is over. I know that's probably unrealistic of me since everyone wants to be first.
― _Rockist__Scientist_, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
Top Albums of the 2000s article will include, roughly in order, Kid A, Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, Merriweather Post Pavillion, Dear Science, Ys, Person Pitch, and The Meadowlands.
In the post I linked to above, Mark R. also writes:
In the meantime, the half-decade albums and singles lists that we ran in 2005 give some indication of what we thought of the first five years. Of course, a lot has changed since then. I mean, surely, a better album has come along since Kid A, right? (...Right?)
I think there's still a good chance Kid A will take the top spot, but then again I really don't think P4k would want to post a list putting the same artist on top, although of course it's all up to which critics vote for which albums, and I have a feeling most of them won't put Kid A in the top spot.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)
Rockist Scientist: I was thinking earlier today that this seems kind of early, but I'm guessing it takes a lot of work to put something like this together, and once this is over they'll still have to put out their typical end-of-the-year stuff for 2009. Being early can't hurt either, I guess.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)
I'm also really looking forward to the essays they'll be publishing:
August 24: Eric Harvey on the social history of the mp3August 27: Tom Ewing on the decade in pop(...)September 14: Marc Masters on the decade in noiseSeptember 16: [nabisco] [.] on the mainstreaming of indie
August 27: Tom Ewing on the decade in pop
(...)
September 14: Marc Masters on the decade in noise
September 16: [nabisco] [.] on the mainstreaming of indie
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
lol @ the nabisco line
I say there NO WAY that Kid A will take the top spot. And it shouldn't. It's not the best album of the decade. It's not even the best Radiohead album of the decade.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)
No hip-hop article? Also, has Jay-Z done enough to sully his reputation that The Blueprint isn't a lock for top 5 anymore?
― The last Gooner optimist: (a hoy hoy), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
If I had my way:
(1) http://crawdaddy.wolfgangsvault.com/uploadedImages/Wolfgangs_Vault/Crawdaddy!/Copy/Articles/Issue148/ExPostFacto-large.jpg
(2) http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_IHL4cs57bg4/R2nTMv7cvoI/AAAAAAAABqY/aepcAhYvzXE/s320/Joanna+Newsom+-+Ys.jpg
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)
Johnny, which do you think is better? Amnesiac? HTTT? In Rainbows?
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
To the contrary, I think Jay is one of the only *big* rappers from the first half of the 00s who's still making anything worth a damn in the second half of the 00s. But from what I gather, my love of the American Gangster album/sdtrk puts me in a big minority. xxp
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)
It would be hard to pick between Amnesiac and In Rainbows.
Why doesn't any other music mag/sites do ambitious lists like this anymore?
― Suggest Ban Momus: http://tinyurl.com/lkaugs (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
I like HTTT a lot more than Kid A but it will never appear in anyone's best-of-the-decade list.
― I am over wieght and I have angelical quilities (HI DERE), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
It's not like pfork has a monopoly on listing things
Other obvious choices for P4k's best-of-the-decade list: You Forgot It In People, Silent Shout, Funeral (How did I forget that one until now?), something by Grizzly Bear, something by Deerhunter, the first Interpol record, something by The New Pornographers, Murray Street. . .
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)
I remember getting Rolling Stone's "Best of the 80s" issue sometime in 1990 and that was like a bible for me for a little while. I had 100 albums to seek out, more than half of which I'd never heard. Granted, I was 16 and the internet was still in the distant future and I lived in a town with only one really decent record store, so my lack of exposure to many cool things might've made the RS list seem more like a revelation than it should've. But yeah... I applaud Pitchfork for doing this thing, even though there's a good chance I'll hate the result.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)
i had the feeling they did this one before, but i guess those were the nineties....
― Ludo, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
I mean everyone complains about pfork lists, but no one else does it. How hard would it be for the staff of a magazine to put together a list of 200 albums?
― Suggest Ban Momus: http://tinyurl.com/lkaugs (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
In my case, I wasn't interested in a sequel.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe Popmatters or whatever will do something? The only site that I can think of that would have done, had it still existed, was Stylus.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
*would have done ONE
Johnny: It's hard for me to pick a favorite, but I like In Rainbows and Kid A equally as albums. I love HTTT, but I also think it's somewhat of a mess at times, and "I Will" and "Go to Sleep" are two of my least favorite RH tunes.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
All the UK mags will do it. They live on be-all/end-all lists.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
That being said, "Wolf at The Door," "There There," "Where I End and You Begin," "Scatterbrain" . . . so many favorites.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
I bet you Tiny Mix Tapes or Cokemachineglow will do some end-of-the-decade stuff too.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
and they'll all display the same cliches/ol' canon mediocrity. (the unknown gems probably would be in the individual lists of the contributors)
― Ludo, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
Re: the Pitchfork list... I wonder where the first CYHSY album will rate, seeing as it was God's gift to music for six months in 2005.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
I don't understand this 'no-one makes large lists' thing. Hell, this week NME put out another fucking top 100 list. Every music/film/other-type-of-thing-that-can-be-listed publication going will do a big and silly list/commentary type thing for the end of the decade AND year within the next couple of months.
― The last Gooner optimist: (a hoy hoy), Monday, 10 August 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)
I can hardly wait for Paste's decade list. lol
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)
whiney's just fukin w/ everybody u guys
― mark cl, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
I think it would be almost more interesting to just publish the individual writers' lists. Someone unaffiliated with Pitchfork would probably sit down and tabulate a final score for each record anyway, and I'm sure people do want to see a final list of 200 records, but it might be more interesting if there was no formal ranking.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
Or perhaps just have all the contributors list their 10 favorite records of the decade in alphabetical order or the order in which they were released?
Yeah, screw ranking. List them alphabetically or whatever.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
y'allz can lol at me if you want but if someone held a gun to my head and told me to name the best record of the 00s, it'd be this onehttp://z.about.com/d/folkmusic/1/0/s/E/GillianWelch-Time.jpgwill it even be mentioned in pfork's list?
― tylerw, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
(I understand the impulse to rank, though... whenever I think about making a list, it's more fun once it starts narrowing down to the top 10 or 15) xp
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
will it even be mentioned in pfork's list?
If so, no higher than #80. :(
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
I understand the impulse too, but for me once I narrow a list of favorite records down to, say, twenty records or whatever I couldn't rank them without being kind of dishonest. They'd all be my favorite records, but I'd have different reasons for loving them all.
I really love Wilco's a ghost is born. They're my favorite band, and I think it's their best work, but I couldn't honestly say I love it more or less than Joanna Newsom's Ys, another record I really, really treasure. I would rank them differently depending on my mood.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
Oh good, we were just arguing on that Wavves thread about whether indie was in fact more mainstream or not.
― jaymc, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
I'm not fuckin. I'm saying no one goes as hard as pfork in the "making lists" dept. Who else is gonna do 500 songs/200 albums?
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 10 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
How will this hold up: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/5358-the-moon-antarctica/
― matt2, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
Which I assume is why I assume there's a thread about it
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 10 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
You know, that album only finished #18 on PFM's 2005 list. It got a 9.0 because Brian Howe loved it, and the site to a certain extent wanted to get behind it, but from what I understand there were quite a few staffers who didn't give a shit about it at all. Can't imagine it will finish particularly high.
― jaymc, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno i feel like lists are basically what music magazines do nowadays? didn't rolling stone do like a 500 greatest albums of all time? xp
― mark cl, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
100 greatest guitarists / 100 best singers etc
http://mentaldefective.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/illinoise.jpg
^ I wonder how high this will make it, too.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
I think Wilco's "At Least That What You Said," which won't chart, should be in the Top 10 for best songs of the decade.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:16 (sixteen years ago)
Good shout on Gillian Welch. Sun Kil Moon's Ghosts of the Great Highway and April would both be top ten for me... It's bound to be Kid A for Pitchfork isn't it?
― Wax Cat, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
Because the decade isn't fucking over yet?
― Matos W.K., Monday, 10 August 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
Johnny, which do you think is better? Amnesiac? HTTT? In Rainbows?____________________________________________It would be hard to pick between Amnesiac and In Rainbows.
____________________________________________
Good man! I bet CYHSY isn't in the Top 10. But Silent Shout has to be!
Ghosts Of The Great Highway would be a terrific choice, too. Maybe The Clientele!
(Sorry for so many "!" Kinda looking forward to this).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 10 August 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
loving kshighway tbh
― crutboard dudes get subway, totally (J0rdan S.), Monday, 10 August 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, J0rdan! :-D One of the few times someone has said something nice to me instead of trying to chase me off a thread. I really appreciate it.
― kshighway, Monday, 10 August 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)
young liars>>>>dear science any day of the week
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 10 August 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
I'd love to see a "Best Bands/Artist of the Decade" type list for guys like Spoon who have been consistently great throughout the decade, but don't make any of those big statement type albums that these other list tend to reward.
― Moreno, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)
posting this list during summer 2010 would have been nicer.. the last 4 months of the 90's included some great releases, and i'm sure 2009 won't be any different.
pitchfork's assessment of 2000s music is far less interesting to me than their assessment of 70s 80s or 90s music. i will read their lists as they post them, and i'm not expecting to appreciate most of their favorites, as i don't find "chamber pop" along the lines of antony and the johnsons or fleet foxes to be all that interesting.. i also never understood the hype regarding battles, mountain goats, bright eyes, my morning jacket, destroyer, fiery furnaces, etc, etc, etc .. and i'm sure these bands will be thoroughly fellated before the festivities are through.
― billstevejim, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
Good call. I was just making the point last night to Kenan and the Rev that I've never loved any of Spoon's albums, but all of them are "pretty good" and they'd have a pretty stellar greatest-hits collection at this point.
― jaymc, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
If only I was a mountain goat, to feel the force of online fellation.
― The last Gooner optimist: (a hoy hoy), Monday, 10 August 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
x-post Yes, and London Calling came out in December 1979.
― President Keyes, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)
yeah.. so did the wall
― billstevejim, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)
In my case, I wasn't interested in a sequel.― Ned Raggett
― Ned Raggett
The anticipation for Ned's Top 136 Albums of the 2000s begins... here, with me. I for one would find it infinitely more interesting than the Pfork end of decade features (though I am looking forward to individual lists from a few writers, and to those essays as well).
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 10 August 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
It all kicks off on Monday, August 17, when we'll begin a weeklong countdown of our Top 500 Tracks of the 2000s (most of which you'll be able to listen to)
Does anyone else have trouble playing those stupid Lala embeds or is it just me? I could before, then I created an account at Lala, and now I can't anymore. Fuckers.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)
yeah theyre retarded. works sometimes, doesnt others
― we make rub' dongs from 4" to 6" (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 August 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)
The anticipation for Ned's Top 136 Albums of the 2000s begins... here, with me. I for one would find it infinitely more interesting than the Pfork end of decade features (though I am looking forward to individual lists from a few writers, and to those essays as well).― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, August 10, 2009 9:44 PM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, August 10, 2009 9:44 PM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I sure hope Tom Ewing does a Top 100 singles of the decade list. The one he did for the nineties is WITHOUT QUESTION my favorite list of all time. And it's how I discovered ILM in fact!
― Mr. Snrub, Monday, 10 August 2009 22:45 (sixteen years ago)
That's a lot sure, but I def don't think we are guilty of doing many lists, or listicles. I also think having streams of most songs cushions the could-be bloat and allows the tracks list to work as a library that people can/ideally will return to as much as a list. As for LPs, contrary to opinion we cover a wide range of music than are credited with, go in depth w/reviews on way more records than most pubs, and this decade saw the release of much more music than most. Proportionally, I'm not sure 200 records on our site from the 00s is much different than 100 from a print mag a few decades ago. Or maybe I just want the non-obvious things, which will populate the second 100, to get some due.
As for why now...Well, for one thing, Spin and RS did their 90s lists in Aug/Sept a decade ago, and so I assumed they'd do that again. I also thought Blender would stick it out and end with a big 00s blowout around the same time. Most of all though, by the time everyone in the friggin world runs their own 00s and 2009 stuff, the last thing you all will want in Jan/Feb is another gigantic list, bigger than the others. Think of how much list fatigue you all get by the time our year-end list comes out anyway. This being the internet, we can amend the list later with extra blurbs if need be-- not re-rank but just add an extra page, not a big thing. On the whole the imperfections of doing this now vs. the imperfections of doing it later were weighed and for once we were into being first with our stuff instead of last (which, next to pazz and jop, we tend to be at a year's end). Doing this a few months later wasn't going to change the outcome much anyway: I doubt many 09 LPs would make it either way. Not sure I'll personally vote for more than one or two.
It seems like a lot of content, but it's really not as much as it looks-- three lists on our end, artists lists, a timeline wrapup of events, four essays. Were this a print mag, that's pretty much what any year-end issue would look like, let alone a decade edition. We're just spreading it out over seven/eight weeks.
― scottpl, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)
How dare you have a plan, Scott. It's supposed to be all improv, to be more real.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)
scott i feel like it's worth saying you are a patient and awesome dude for coming to every inane ilm pitchfork thread and representing the brand with reason and class.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)
I also think having streams of most songs cushions the could-be bloat and allows the tracks list to work as a library that people can/ideally will return to as much as a list.
For the record, I wasn't complaining about the idea. I just don't like that Lala won't always work (for me, and possibly others as well).
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)
yeah same, i like the idea a lot but prefer those youtube bottom things
― we make rub' dongs from 4" to 6" (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:32 (sixteen years ago)
why is it only in the last week that i have seen ppl refer to this decade as "the aughts" and not before?
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)
Discovery will be no. 1.
― David Katz (davek_00), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:35 (sixteen years ago)
(1) just awful
(2) even worse
― kshighway, Monday, August 10, 2009 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
You are just cruising for a SB, aren't you?
― Alex in SF, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:35 (sixteen years ago)
^^OTM
― jaymc, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
On Andrew Unterberger's countdown of his top 100 songs of the decade, he repeatedly calls it the "Naughty Oughties." The more often he uses the term, the funnier it gets.
― jaymc, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
yah its pretty terrible when some1 like different music from u ~~~ its like theyre not even human!
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Monday, 10 August 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)
Slightly off topic: Always been curious to see their original "Top 100 albums of the 90s" list complete with the little blurbs about each selection. Anyone have it saved or know how to access it at this point?
― Evan, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:54 (sixteen years ago)
Scott, I'd really love to see that first Top of the 90s list. Unless you guys are embarrassed of it or something, any way I could get a look at it?
― Evan, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:56 (sixteen years ago)
Original Pfork top 100 of the 90s list, no blurbs:
http://rateyourmusic.com/list/antoine_doinel/pitchforkmedia_top_100_albums_of_the_1990s__original_list_
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 00:20 (sixteen years ago)
and there it is. I think like six people voted in that, from what I was told years later. Ideally about 50 people will vote this time.
― scottpl, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 00:34 (sixteen years ago)
Surprised to see Uncle Tupelo on that list. I love Anodyne, but didn't get the sense that it would rank up there on a best of the 1990s poll for an indie pub.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 00:42 (sixteen years ago)
lol Walt Mink
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:12 (sixteen years ago)
That Walt Mink album is one of my favorite albums of the 90s.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:16 (sixteen years ago)
I remember exactly what I listened to in the 80s, and I remember exactly what I've listened to in this decade, but the 90s are a complete blur to me. Most of the Pitchfork list seems familiar, but not exactly likeable. If pressed, I could probably make a list of 100 albums from the 1990s that I like, but I'm really better off leaving a lot of that behind.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:22 (sixteen years ago)
okay lol I just saw that El Producto is on there as well as Miss Happiness and yes, that is very lol
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:25 (sixteen years ago)
100% OTM.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:27 (sixteen years ago)
wait dan which walt mink album is better? i remember dl'ing them in lol college once.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:29 (sixteen years ago)
I love Miss Happiness to an unreasonable degree and basically feel that every subsequent album is worse than the one that precedes it.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:30 (sixteen years ago)
OK I am absolutely LOVING that Andrew Unterberger top 100 songs of the decade list posted upthread, but FUCKING HELL it's click, read, click the back button, read, click, read, click the back button, read, click, read, click the back button, read, click previous entries, wait five seconds for the youtubes to load, click, read, click the back button...
― Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:32 (sixteen years ago)
just so y'all are ready for this I feel like I oughta let you know I'm gunning for all ten of the top ten slots & have been lobbying hard for em all year
am willing to make room for The Fix but that's about it
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:38 (sixteen years ago)
congrats in advance on all the fellating
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:40 (sixteen years ago)
it was rough going at time but I kept my mind focused on my goal
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:41 (sixteen years ago)
Nothing worth having comes easily.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:42 (sixteen years ago)
how the plaque on my wall is gonna read
BEST RECORDS OF THE 2000s
1. Me2. Me3. Scarface, The Fix4. Me5. Me6. Me7. Me8. Me9. Me10. Me
the plaque will be hung above an eternal flame burning in a small alcove in my backyard. it costs fifty cents to see it, unless you were instrumental in the poll that resulted in the plaque: then you get a discount.
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:47 (sixteen years ago)
when you cross into the alcove you trip a sensor that plays a snippet of a Justice Roberts saying "Man is Nairf!"
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:48 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwajTekSAcM
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:52 (sixteen years ago)
If Ms. Hoffs is included I'll pony up $1.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:54 (sixteen years ago)
that's not Suzanna Hoffs, that's what J0hn d looks like when he's on TV
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 01:58 (sixteen years ago)
I heard TV added a few pounds, but I hadn't heard they were all in the breasts.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:08 (sixteen years ago)
j0hn d u shld take a scrncap of the top ten list and then print it out (greyscale) and then tack it to the front of your fridge and leave it there until u move
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:10 (sixteen years ago)
You are just cruising for a SB, aren't you?― Alex in SF, Monday, August 10, 2009 6:35 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
― Alex in SF, Monday, August 10, 2009 6:35 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
Alex: This isn't the first time you've said something like this to me for no reason, and I'd like to you to stop it. I'm not trolling; the Wilco and Joanna Newsom LPs are two of my absolute favorite records of the decade, and I'm free to say so, especially in a thread that I started to discuss Pitchfork's end-of-the-decade articles.
I didn't start this thread because I'm trolling either; I actually love Pitchfork, and it's one of two publications--the other being the New York Times--that I've actively visited and consistently enjoyed for the past six years or so.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:39 (sixteen years ago)
I'd love to see a Wilco disc on Pitchfork's Top 10 (I'd prefer it to be Sky Blue Sky tho).
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:45 (sixteen years ago)
I think because it's a list-by-committee type thing, Yankee Hotel Foxtrot has the best chance of placing in the top 10. Some people may rank others higher on their ballots, but some people won't have on their ballots at all.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)
"...won't have others on their ballots..."
Can't type today!
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:48 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I think YHF has a good chance to make it in the Top 10. P4k gave it a 10, it's their one record people are most aware of, and it's their highest-selling record to date. Ghost has no chance, and both SBS and the new one didn't receive a high enough ranking, and aren't favored by enough people, to make it.
One of the things I love about Wilco is that everyone seems to have a different favorite record of theirs. I really love A ghost is born. I can't think of a better guitar song in indie rock from the past decade than "At Least That's What You Said." By that I just mean there's nothing I love more. The three descending piano chords, Glenn's drumming that follows the guitar and piano so closely, and Jeff's note-spraying guitar work that, although it seems completely random, I wouldn't want to change a single note. The whole record though--especially because of (1) Jim O'Rourke's quiet, ethereal production work, (2)Jeff's lyrics and hey-my-vocals-are-quiet-and-fucked-because-I'm-fucked, and (3) the fucking stellar arrangements--is just wonderful. I've had nothing hit me on quiet the visceral level this record did when I first started listening to it, and it has a high place in my personal canon of favorite records ever.
That being said: Daniel, why are you a SBS fan? I'd love to hear your take on that record!
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 02:58 (sixteen years ago)
I'm not especially coherent now (preparing for emergency Hr'g in AM and it's my wedding anniversary!), so this probably won't come out well. Sky Blue Sky hits the right nostalgic buttons for me; I love that country-rock sound, especially when it isn't being used by contemptable bands like The Eagles. I know the songs on SBS aren't as hooky as those on some other Wilco discs, but they make up for it with their arrangements and technique. Also, Nels Cline adds such muscle to the band. His presence change the band's songs from quaint to coiled with power. And I like how they dropped some of the sonic sheen from their songs, and went with more direct, personal lyrics. The songs hold up well without the extra frills.
Anyway, as I say, incoherent babbling.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)
You're either brand new to this "internet" thing, or you're sockpuppet.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:19 (sixteen years ago)
lol @ being far enough down some rabbithole that you are incredulous that ppl like kshighway exist.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:22 (sixteen years ago)
i have sex with pitchfork
― velko, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:22 (sixteen years ago)
I love P4000 and NYT. My favorite artist is Joanna Newsom. I came to ILX and immediately started threads about how much I love Newsom and P4000.
Such a person does not exist.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:23 (sixteen years ago)
His first thread ever was this gem:
Best Music Criticism of the 2000s
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:24 (sixteen years ago)
"lol @ being far enough down some rabbithole that you are incredulous that ppl like kshighway exist."
Perhaps we have been on ILX too long.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)
ur right that's a totally horrible idea for a thread
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)
Also, his first post ever on ILX was:
Some of you already mentioned Coldplay, but surprisingly no one said anything about "Viva la Vida," unless you count Geir's "Every single Coldplay song" vote.
I can't think of many, if any, mainstream rock songs from the past decade that were as well produced as that one.
And he made it three posts before starting that thread. Maybe he's just VERY PRECOCIOUS!
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)
sum ppl do read the forums before joining/posting i mean cmon
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:28 (sixteen years ago)
I'm with Mordy. He's either a sock or the absolute perfect embodiment of one. Not that I'm SBing either way (it was a joke--one I hadn't actually made before I don't think btw.)
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)
OTOH, that best-of music criticism thread led me to these exciting, perceptive reviews of Miles Davis' discs.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)
Totally SBing for that.
n.e.ways isnt it like super passe to care abt dudes liking indie now ur supposed to h8 dudes who like fidget house or w/e
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:30 (sixteen years ago)
I don't keep track.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:30 (sixteen years ago)
I don't care about what he likes or dislikes. I just think he's a bit too well put together to actually be real.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:30 (sixteen years ago)
There's nothing wrong with caring about Pitchfork, the NYT, Joanna Newsom, music criticism, and ILX. There's also nothing wrong with my posting about these things.
Mordy, why do you think I'm a sockpuppet? What am I doing that's upsetting you and Alex so much? Alex? Seriously, I want to know.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:31 (sixteen years ago)
lol, me? I gotta check my totals.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:31 (sixteen years ago)
lamp otm back there. and btw i fucking hate fucking mark prindle.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
im just saying if u where going to troll ilm ud make a sock that was sum coke usen nyc kid that loved herve and count and sinden and capitalism
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
lol
And what's wrong with thinking Eno's production on the Coldplay song is better than the production I've heard on any other mainstream rock song?
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
I'm not upset dude. I just don't think you're real.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
FFS who cares
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)
I'd SB Mark Prindle but he doesn't post here.
You aren't upsetting me, kshighway (if that is your real name). I find you very cute. Just somewhat hard to take seriously.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:33 (sixteen years ago)
hey kshighway what are you anticipating vis-a-vis arcade fire and all this pitchfork end of decade biz?
― wilter, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:34 (sixteen years ago)
i consider myself a member of the kshighway fanclub.
― velko, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)
In a world where Geir Hongro exists you have trouble believing someone like kshighway could be real?
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:35 (sixteen years ago)
I'm not a music expert. I'm 22 and naive about most music outside of indie rock. I'll own that. But there's nothing wrong with me being enthusiastic about the stuff that I love and starting threads to discuss those things with other people who might be interested in them.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:36 (sixteen years ago)
calling unfamiliar posters sockpuppets: for those who absolutely can't engage or ignore.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:36 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway keep doing your thing man.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:37 (sixteen years ago)
the kid has moxie
― velko, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:37 (sixteen years ago)
Really you need to let this stuff not bother you. If you are really this earnest then we'll accept it eventually (just like we accept that Geir is really Geir) and the laugh'll be on us.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:38 (sixteen years ago)
kid's got zeal
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:38 (sixteen years ago)
If you are really this earnest then we'll accept it eventually (just like we accept that Geir is really Geir) and the laugh'll be on us.
But not totally on us. Cause you'll still be super earnest.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:39 (sixteen years ago)
god who would want that
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:39 (sixteen years ago)
mordy's a little mad cuz the eagles MLB is out for the season ;_;
― we make rub' dongs from 4" to 6" (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)
mordy, you're being hella douchey fyi
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)
XP :'(
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)
:-)
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)
lol k3v bringin the pain.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)
yr d-coordinator died fyi
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:42 (sixteen years ago)
the naysayers do not rule this place. kshighway will always be welcome on ilm
― velko, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:42 (sixteen years ago)
nah i'm an eagles fan 2, we like to be upset together and project it elsewhere, it's what philly fans do
xp call all i know :(((
― we make rub' dongs from 4" to 6" (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks velko!
I'm not going anywhere, and I'm sure I'll eventually just get used to taking shit for actually liking indie rock here.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)
I like indie rock too, but not enough to ever talk about it that much. But I'm old. When I was 22, it's all I wanted to talk about.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway the big secret is that everyone acts like they don't like indie rock but check the post count on any thread about the radioheads ;)
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
There's a lot of indie rock fans here. But: What Dr. Fever said.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
uh tbh ilm is like 90% indie rock so i wouldn't really worry
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
What the hell. Kshighway (who btw is named after Brooklyn??), besides Joanna Newsom, Radiohead and Wilco - three acts that have gotten a ton of exposure - what other stuff do you like? Surely you have differentiated taste outside PFM's top 10 acts of the aughts?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)
the other 10% is indie guilt
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:46 (sixteen years ago)
stay classy mordy
the naysayers have always ruled this place. the new generation of earnest twentysomething nudniks posting in the voices of 14-year-old text messagers notwithstanding.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:46 (sixteen years ago)
I remember when I was shocked, shocked that everyone hadn't grown out of their earnestness as I had just the other week, too, guys.
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:48 (sixteen years ago)
Which isn't to say that earnestness isn't like a giant red flag to me, either, obv.
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
in kshighway's favor, he does post in full sentences with more or less proper spelling and syntax.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
Why is it a giant red flag, Matos?
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:50 (sixteen years ago)
I think the red flag is that people who use the internet at your age tend to have tougher skins about what people say to them.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
Because I'm jaded, kshighway.
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
you clowns the is he a sock portion of the discussion ended 10 minutes ago
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
http://images.inmagine.com/img/designpics/dp014/dp1792270.jpg
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)
sorry, I missed that meeting back whenever the new generation of total dicks took this place over
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:53 (sixteen years ago)
forget it, matos. it's a middle school in chinatown.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)
LOCK THREAD
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)
please
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)
I have a feeling I'll be taken to task for this list, but here's some other stuff "outside PFM's top 10 acts of the aughts" that I love, because Mordy asked. Scrolling through iTunes . . .
Television, Gang of Four, Talk Talk, Scott Walker, Slint, Talking Heads, Sonic Youth, My Bloody Valentine, Tool (will get shit for this), A Perfect Circle (ditto), Kraftwerk, The Focus Group, Dinosaur Jr, Cocteau Twins, Joy Division, Aphex Twin, VU, Big Black, Brian Eno, Pavement, Portishead Nick Drake, Mission of Burma, Bob Dylan.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)
Missed a comma between Portishead and Nick Drake.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:56 (sixteen years ago)
wow u guys r totally dignified and awesome
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:56 (sixteen years ago)
There's good stuff there! You should talk more about those people! Honestly, I'd prefer you start a Tool thread and earnestly defend them than explain why Joanna Newsom is the bomb.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)
you know, maybe I've changed my mind now
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)
XXP Jeez, stop being a fucking white knight dude. Just think of this thread as a scene out of Irreversible.
i kno rite
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:58 (sixteen years ago)
You will never get shit for liking Tool or APC.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:58 (sixteen years ago)
perhaps on planet ned.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 03:59 (sixteen years ago)
Not from you, Ned, but I'm pretty sure Tool is more or less universally loathed by people here.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
nah i like tool
― mark cl, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
Hey I can dream.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
u will find fans
i am now imagining the gaspar noe version of ilx. it involves a metaphor for my wasted life raping me in 2009 and the film then progressing back to 2001.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway no offense but I don't think you've got that much grasp of what's universally loathed by people here
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
i forgot this was the thread where everybody rated each others taste
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:01 (sixteen years ago)
iirc we couldn't find anything that didn't have a defender
― BIG HOOS's wacky crack variety hour (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:02 (sixteen years ago)
I'm guessing not much is universally loathed here, considering all of the threads I've seen on a million different genres, so let me correct myself: I'd be willing to bet that the majority of posters on ILM don't have an especially high opinion of Tool.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:02 (sixteen years ago)
so who wants me to post the pfork singles list in full?
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)
j/k
strongo thinks very highly of Tool, btw, he's got truckloads of hatemail from a "their last album was better" review to prove it
― some dude, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
1. "Save a Horse (Ride a Cowboy)"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
xp
hows about i post my assignments and everyone tries to guess where they placed?
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
2. Crazy Frog, "Axel F"
3. "The Thong Song"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)
4. Daniel Powter, "Bad Day"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)
5. "Heaven (DJ Sammy Remix)"
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:56 AM (8 minutes ago)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)
6. Antony & the Johnsons, "Hope There's Someone"
7. "How You Remind Me"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)
8. Avril Lavigne, "Complicated"
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)
i'm confused--like should i be surprised or not by who is being retarded on this thread?
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)
classic bein a dick on the interent stuff here - takin notes 4 sure - good 2 no how the rode in the olde tymes
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:07 (sixteen years ago)
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:07 (sixteen years ago)
9. "Poker Face"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:07 (sixteen years ago)
10. Lamp, "♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
11. "where's the love?"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
Wow this thread is now a full on nostalgia trip
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
At some point, this thread became my favorite ILM thread in at least a week.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
12. dream - "he loves u not"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
13 "incongruous juxtaposition"
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
I don't want to jinx it, but this is quickly turning into A++ thread.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
strongo, you wrote the P4k review for 10,000 Days? (For some reason, because of the "ghost" at the end of your name I thought you were someone using their display name to refer to the fact that Jess doesn't post here anymore for some reason, similarly to how max's display name refers to Dom (RIP).) Still figuring out who's who behind the names here.
Anyway, 5.9 is a pretty fair rating for 10,000 Days. I don't really like that record. Lateralus was better. It's the only Tool record I still own.
"The Thong Song" should, but won't, make the list.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
14. Chad Kroger & Josey Scott, "Hero"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)
14. dj assault - "nipples n clits"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:10 (sixteen years ago)
Morday, if ILM and P4k are still around in 2019, I will start a thread about Pitchfork's next best-of-the-decade roundup and dedicate it to you.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:10 (sixteen years ago)
15. Asher Roth, "I Love College"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:10 (sixteen years ago)
Morday!
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:10 (sixteen years ago)
I wrote a 1,000+ article on I Love College for my college magazine.
65. bon iver - skinny love (aol im convo remix)
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
16. . . . And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead, anything
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
*Mordy, sorry. Hahaha!
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
Rebecca de Morday
― velko, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
Link pls
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
17. high on fire - "razor hoof"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:11 (sixteen years ago)
18. sting - "if i ever lose my faith"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)
No way am I linking to that shit.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)
19. steely dan - "deacon blues"
20. napalm death - "you suffer"
Lateralus is the only Tool record I still own, too. And I just listened to it last week for the first time in ages and liked it a lot.
That you've come to ILM post-Dom Passantino is a great and truly blessed thing. Never take it for granted. several xposts
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)
21. joan osborne - "one of us"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:13 (sixteen years ago)
26 abn - umm hmm
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:13 (sixteen years ago)
I actually referred to Jess's Idolator “Can/Will 2009 Go Lower Than ‘I Love College’?” in that article. That's how I found out about the song in the first place!
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:13 (sixteen years ago)
22. the banana splits - "tra la la"
There's still Ich Luge Bullets!
this is kinda like when sitcoms stop having jokes and start having catchphrases
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
23. Pharaoh Sanders, "Black Unity"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
24. schooly d - "put your filas on"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
42 ryan leslie ft. cassie - addiction (remix)
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
25. Hercules, "7 Ways to Jack"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:15 (sixteen years ago)
99 frightened rabbit - keep yourself warm (bassline mix)
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:15 (sixteen years ago)
26. janis ian - "at seventeen"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:15 (sixteen years ago)
27. steve reich - "it's gonna rain"
28. The Hues Corporation, "Rock the Boat"
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)
29. the moonglows - "sincerely"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:16 (sixteen years ago)
Okay, liking this thread less now.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:17 (sixteen years ago)
30. william s. burroughs - "bradley the buyer"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:17 (sixteen years ago)
yall dont get it its like that comedy shit - if something isnt funny u just keep doin it and doin it eventually at like the mid-50s theres gonna be a wilco track and yall kill yourself laughing
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:19 (sixteen years ago)
I'm actually listening to Wilco right now, so there is sort of a Wilco soundtrack to this thread (at least for me). "Deeper Down," btw.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:19 (sixteen years ago)
31. lamp - "♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (remix)"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)
anyways i just wanted to say - always sad that i missed the formative yrs of this msg board having been busy bein 15 and not h8ing myself - thanks 4 the xp
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:21 (sixteen years ago)
busy bein 15 and not h8ing myself
nice try
― Matos W.K., Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
there's still plenty of time.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
: : sigh : :
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:24 (sixteen years ago)
seems like you guys have the monopoly tho fyi
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:24 (sixteen years ago)
tho
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:24 (sixteen years ago)
fyi you guys hate yourselves. just in case you were wondering idk
― Mordy, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:25 (sixteen years ago)
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:25 (sixteen years ago)
2 rite
and good nite ^+^
― ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿ (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:26 (sixteen years ago)
nite ♀ + ♂ + ♋ = ☿
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:27 (sixteen years ago)
; )
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)
Wow. What the hell is all this?
― Evan, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)
^ Pretty good summation of this thread so far. :-)
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 04:38 (sixteen years ago)
This is essentially message boarding 101:
Post a thread with the word "Pitchfork" in it, watch it swell to 250 posts by the end of the day
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:04 (sixteen years ago)
It's weird to think about people kshighway's age who view Pitchfork as this kind of "always been there" enterprise, while us old(er) folk remember when it popped up from nowhere and had many many growing pains.
I was the same age when SPIN started as kshighway was when Pitchfork started.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:13 (sixteen years ago)
what a world, man.
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:13 (sixteen years ago)
i hear some fat limey idiot kid can't use a walkman either
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:14 (sixteen years ago)
we can help you out with that one
― crutboard dudes get subway, totally (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:15 (sixteen years ago)
?
I was just giving myself perspective about it all (albeit in a public forum). No reason to punch my balls.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:16 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, Pitchfork was the first music website I really followed, starting back in the first half of 2005.
I read Rolling Stone and Spin before I started following music stuff online.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:16 (sixteen years ago)
here's logo:
http://cdn.pitchfork.com/media/decadeinmusic342_2.jpg
― Choose Leif, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:17 (sixteen years ago)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com
I had no memory at all of the brown layouts in 2003/04.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 05:24 (sixteen years ago)
best part of this thread is getting linked 2 wayback machine for this CLASSSSIC
Beanie Sigel [ft. Cam'ron]: "Dead or Alive"Turning a Bon Jovi cowboy ballad into twisted funk, tempered by subtle synth and pitch-shifted vocals, Beanie Sigel takes to pirate radio to get his plea for freedom heard by the masses. The vocals sound like Catching a Case for Dummies: Beanie explains that you will fear for your life ("Clip your contacts, stay focused like contacts/ Your head's open for a contract") and your mother's life ("Can't go where mama at, the last place you wanna bring the drama at/ The first place they're gonna try, I promise"), but be sure to use history as a precursor for your escape ("Don't be scared like the red coats coming, nigga/ Stay underground and keep runnin' like Tubman"). Cam'ron appears like a subscriber to the program with his tales of success ("When the operation goes stale, ain't no jail/ I did my whole album on bail!") and references to fugitives of the past ("Read the paper, eggs and OJ/ Call CD The Head of the O.J.'s"). Here's hoping Sigel's spending all his time between court dates in the vocal booth. [Rollie Pemberton; June 4th, 2004] FIVE STARS
― butthurt (deej), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 06:40 (sixteen years ago)
btw this song is awful
― butthurt (deej), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 06:41 (sixteen years ago)
the review is fine but what a contradiction btween enthusiasm & quality
― butthurt (deej), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 06:45 (sixteen years ago)
I'm betting on The Unicorns "Who will cut our hair when we're gone" placing somewhere in the top 30 albums. Kid A or Person Pitch will very likely end up hjacking the top spots.
― Moka, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 07:23 (sixteen years ago)
Also Madvillainy will end up at number.... mmm let's see... 7.
― Moka, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 07:35 (sixteen years ago)
Just wanted to say that kshighway kind of reminds me of me when I first started posting to ILX six years ago. That's all.
Oh, and this is OTM:
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Monday, August 10, 2009 10:22 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Keep doing your thing, man.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:03 (sixteen years ago)
assuming kshighway is real, which i don't necessarily but don't care - half of me is really heartened by someone who appears to be so into the idea of music writing at all, the other half flinches when i see the examples of what he's into
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:07 (sixteen years ago)
me neither. i kinda like them
― thomp, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:21 (sixteen years ago)
How many albums did they actually give 10/10 in this decade? I can think of Standards, which I somehow doubt will get a very high rating in the end of decade poll, and one of the Trail of Dead ones...
Also, has anyone mentioned Sophtware Slump?
― Wax Cat, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:36 (sixteen years ago)
Pretty sure that Yankee Hotel Foxtrot received the last 10.0 for a new album.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:43 (sixteen years ago)
Here's their number one album's for each year of the decade so far for reference
Radiohead - Kid AThe Microphones - The Glow pt 2Interpol - Turn on the Bright LightsThe Rapture - EchoesArcade Fire - FuneralSufjan Stevens - IllinoisThe Knife - Silent ShoutPanda Bear - Person PitchFleet FOxes - Fleet Foxes
I wonder who'll suffer the largest fall from grace? The Rapture are probably in with a shout
― Number None, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:06 (sixteen years ago)
I assume the writers were polled, so it'd depend on whether the ppl who repped for say The Glow Pt 2 back then are still reppin for it now. in any case, I appreciate the list, since I can now go to this thread whenever I forget who it is I have beef with
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
still dig the first three on that list
― wilter, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
have only heard four of those records tbh
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
that is a truly woeful, woeful list
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
this isn't necessarily a judgment of any kind on pfork or indie rock or any of you guys but it seems to me that a lot of the albums ppl are mentioning have aged incredibly poorly.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:14 (sixteen years ago)
of that list i only really like the knife and that interpol record; kid a and the microphones are decent i guess, illinoise is a couple notches below that, not a fan of the other four.
― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:16 (sixteen years ago)
will Voodoo make the top 10? top 20?
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:19 (sixteen years ago)
why wait for Pitchfork
rateyourmusic.com: 2000s Top 1000 Albums http://rateyourmusic.com/charts/top/album/2000s
Kid A is number 1 rated album of the decade at the mo
― djmartian, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
because it's more interesting than looking at an unannotated list on rateyourmusic?
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:24 (sixteen years ago)
The "Amalie" soundtrack is rated #10. I don't think that's a list worth following.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:29 (sixteen years ago)
Anomelie
― Joerg Hi Dere (NickB), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:32 (sixteen years ago)
amelie soundtrack is like the official european backpack alb tho
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
but the rateyourmusic top 100 will be superior to Pitchfork
i.e albums from: Ulver, Negura Bunget, Porcupine Tree, Neurosis, Isis, Drudkh, Rosetta, Primordial, Disillusion, Agalloch, maudlin of the Well, Bohren & der Club of Gore, Arcturus, Opeth
― djmartian, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
Two bands I've heard and liked bookending a bunch of shit I don't care about! You're right, clearly superior!
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
^was waiting for this post before I posted, cheers
― Tim Krul ringmaster (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:39 (sixteen years ago)
ayo j0hn I really like The Fix too, lemme know if you need an intern or something
― Someone Still Loves You Dennis Kucinich's Hot Wife (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
stuffing envelopes and threatening p4k staffers sounds like just the thing I need to cure my obamalaise
― Someone Still Loves You Dennis Kucinich's Hot Wife (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
For a second I thought you were talking about the Pitchfork list of number ones for the decade and I'm all "I thought you liked the Knife..."
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:54 (sixteen years ago)
in what fucked-up dimension would I EVER proclaim myself to be a Fleet Foxes fan
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
Hey you said you liked them on SNL! I figured something weird had happened.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:57 (sixteen years ago)
that Knife album has aged super well, fwiw. I probably like it even more now than I did when it came out.
― Someone Still Loves You Dennis Kucinich's Hot Wife (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:57 (sixteen years ago)
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)
I will rep for Radiohead, The Rapture and The Knife any time, any place. And Ned, I said that Fleet Foxes did a good job but were really boring; not exactly ringing endorsement!
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
(pro-tip: Silent Shout makes an awesome soundtrack for Wipeout HD)
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
sufjan stevens will suffer from a combination of too-big-too-fast/what-have-you-done-for-me-lately?, but one of my stoner buddies is convinced he's gonna totally reinvent himself and drop "the merriweather post pavilion of 2010"
― Someone Still Loves You Dennis Kucinich's Hot Wife (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
^^^^zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
i guess i should stfu and get off this thread but seriously, i think we should all aim a little higher than the merriweather post pavilion of 2010
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)
making total sense on a pitchfork thread in '09
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:03 (sixteen years ago)
So have we officially given up on Sufjan doing all 50 states? I wish I would've put money on it way back when.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)
You know, I don't know that I have knowingly heard Sufjan Stevens; if I have, it wasn't memorable at all.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)
Isn't Stevens' next opus a concept album on the health care debates raging in rural Congressional districts?
― Anatomy of a Morbius (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)
one man's merriweather post pavilion of 2010 is another man's "freebird" of 1998
― dick made the cover, now count how many cheneys on it (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:07 (sixteen years ago)
sufjanized medicine
― dick made the cover, now count how many cheneys on it (bernard snowy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
enuff about other people's lists, when can we start the rolling ILM decade nominations thread? it'd be nice to have it around for people to lob things at (and for people like me, who have missed 88 percent of all of the interesting music this decade, to sample from). i assume there won't be a poll til early next year, but it's not too early to start the chin-stroking, is it?
("that's not your chin" jokes here...)
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)
there's a semi thread somewhere for this iirc
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)
From an ILM list, I expect at least one if not two MG albums, Portishead, The Knife, Radiohead, and then a bunch of stuff that I won't really care about one way or another.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:22 (sixteen years ago)
Beaches And Canyons btw
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:23 (sixteen years ago)
there's a few things -- "hit of the decade," "anti-hit of the decade," etc. nothing comprehensive tho.
true that the final ilm list might not be much more interesting than anyone else's, but the nomination discussion could be.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)
Your Top Ten Fave Singles/Albums of This Decade
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
musically handles the year-end lists and I guess should have first say in what'll happen regarding a decade list (even if just to say someone else do it.)
― The last Gooner optimist: (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)
oh right the top 10 thread, forgot about that.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:34 (sixteen years ago)
Just wanted to say that kshighway kind of reminds me of me when I first started posting to ILX six years ago. That's all.Oh, and this is OTM:lol @ being far enough down some rabbithole that you are incredulous that ppl like kshighway exist.― wishes to be referred under the pseudonym of kronos (call all destroyer), Monday, August 10, 2009 10:22 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban PermalinkKeep doing your thing, man.― jaymc, Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:03 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
― jaymc, Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:03 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
Thanks, jaymc.
Also, I'm just curious: How do I remind you of what you were like when you first started posting, and why do some people have a hard time believing I exist? Serious questions.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
you changed manyou used to be about the postingwhat happened?
― white flaky mess, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
This is like Alex in NYC trolling again, right? Mods can still do IP checks, can't they?
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
Alex in SF, hello again!
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
LOL
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
assuming kshighway is real, which i don't necessarily but don't care - half of me is really heartened by someone who appears to be so into the idea of music writing at all, the other half flinches when i see the examples of what he's into― lex pretend, Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:07 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
― lex pretend, Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:07 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
I'm not a gimmick. Why would I waste time coming here to talk about indie music if I didn't really like it? As some sort of performance just to mock indie kids? Well, I'm not doing that. I've spent the past five years exploring indie music and other stuff like some postpunk, and I'm sure I'll branch out from here, but so far I've spent most of my time just focusing on getting into indie. And there's nothing wrong with that. It may not be hip to some of you here that I like this stuff, and some of you seem to think I'm too earnest, but I am the way I am and I like what I like. I also like posting here because it is rewarding to talk to a lot of you, and I learn a lot about music and other things.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
i meant the examples of music writing you bring up! all that horribly verbose pitchfork purple prose crap.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)
you can like whatever music you like obv (tho) if ilm inspires you to check out stuff beyond indie then i'm sure everyone here will be v happy, like we were when LJ did it
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
"Why would I waste time coming here to talk about indie music if I didn't really like it?"
Why do trolls do what they do? It's a deep existential question. We should have a thread about it.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, if he is a real person, why would he post on a board full of jaded cranks and not, like, the Saddle Creek board?
― wooden shjipley (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
Thank you, Whiney.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
I post here because this is the only music board on the internet where people actually seem to know what they're talking about. It's a good education, and I try to contribute what little I can.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
wow being polite and offending ur sensibilities with indie music taste, his parents prolly didn't love him enough or something, srsly what the hell is wrong with you alex?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)
i'd lose some of your illusions about people knowing what they're talking about tho
How do I remind you of what you were like when you first started posting
I was really into indie rock and Pitchfork and probably fairly earnest about it, too (not that there's anything wrong with that):
I think this was my second post ever:
Hey nabisco, et al. -- how come no Pitchfork writers voted in the Pazz & Jop? Seems like writing for the site should be make you far more reputable than some of the freelancers they get lists from. Then again, I don't know what's involved in submitting a list.
Partially, I bring it up cuz I feel like PFM writers could have some sway. At least Enon, who put out such a fun record (#15 on Pitchfork's year-end), wouldn't have to languish at #733 (!!) on P&J02.
― jaymc, Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:09 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
wonder what ksh's erykah badu moment will be
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
disappointed you're not still reviewing RnB trax tbh
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
"srsly what the hell is wrong with you alex?"
Apparently I'm a terrible person who doesn't believe in Santa Claus.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
It's ok T, I know what thread they're all on, I'll reclaim the cudgel some time soon
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
Also:
Yes. Elastica would be nowhere without Wire, granted, but "Elastica" > "Pink Flag."― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:21 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I vigorously protest against Jaymc's greater than comparison. I am too tired to do otherwise at present.― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:22 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Hmmm. I'm not making friends too quickly on ILM, am I?― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:24 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
No no, stick to your guns, that's a good thing. :-) It's just that I don't think Elastica ever did much of worth; others disagree.― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:26 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Jaymc, don't worry about it, people here are usually pretty rational about distinguishing between disliking a person and disliking their opinions. I'm not taking this too seriously.
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:30 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:30 AM (6 years ago)
;_;
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)
Jaymc, don't worry about it, people here are usually pretty rational about distinguishing between disliking a person and disliking their opinions.
good point to remember-- though i think you're crazy for liking Elastica more than Pink Flag. . .
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
Have you changed your mind about "Elastica" vs "Pink Flag" ?
― J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
Cuz if you haven't I don't believe you are a real person Mr. Jaymc or whatever you are calling yourself now. *makes squinty suspicious look in general direction of Chicago*
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
I think I tried to give Pink Flag another couple of tries, but it never really did much for me. Maybe I'll return to it later. I like "Outdoor Miner" and "The 15th," though.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)
What a delastica
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)
I got jaymc's back – I listen to Elastica far more than Pink Flag.
― Anatomy of a Morbius (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:13 (sixteen years ago)
jaymc, thanks for posting some of your early posts. They make me feel better about some of my own efforts! :-)
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)
some people are under the impression that there's a prize for being the first person to correctly ID a sockpuppet, so they overcorrect by routinely yelling "sockpuppet!" as much as they can
in a crowded theater, on fire
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
One of the things I like about ILX is that people with insanely divergent perspectives and tastes can coexist, even if that that coexistence is often chaotic.
A++, everyone.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
One that.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)
to be clear, i have no idea what "sockpuppet" means, and my ire wasn't directed at earnest young adults who've recently discovered indie rock.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
a sockpuppet is a fake user created by a forum regular, usually for trolling purposes
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
"some people are under the impression that there's a prize for being the first person to correctly ID a sockpuppet"
Oh I do so hope I win this prize for guessing Alex in NYC earlier. ;-)
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)
FTR I have no ire towards anyone on this thread. Well maybe Dan for his user name. But no not really.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
haha blame nickalicious for that one
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
Oh yeah I hate that guy even more now.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)
Also, re:
Glad I can be somewhat heartening even though my taste isn't to all of your liking. It will get better, promise. :-)
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway has instantly become my favourite ILMer
― bakerstreetsaxsolo, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
you guys realize that dude is not a puppy, right
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
didn't we suggest ban 'a puppy'?
― unban dictionary (blueski), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/x3Rmp1Hjoqz8eyciSAf5dwX7o1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=0RYTHV9YYQ4W5Q3HQMG2&Expires=1250107374&Signature=1T9NkEMhESY8WIevKAFAVu08e7o%3D
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
"you guys realize that dude is not a puppy, right"
The only way you could know that is if he's your SOCKPUPPET, Dan! What do I win? What do I win?
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
That puppy looks somewhat distraught!
― kshighway, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:23 (sixteen years ago)
welcome to the fridge motherfucker
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
he's got nabisco's hand up his ass, for starters
― omar little, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
^goddamn, how painful
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
I've only heard two of those all the way through.
I am not P4k approved.
― EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
I like all of those records bar FF (have not heard The Glow). I am p4k approved, also known as 21 y/o white boy.
― fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
goodhaven't heardokdon't like goodnot bad amazinghaven't heardgood
― omar little, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
thanks omar!
― can au jus (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
or would you have preferred
7.1--6.23.67.36.69.5--7.0
― omar little, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
3.6? ;_;
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y100/aireckoressal/gifs/dealwithit.gif
― omar little, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
alternatively
haven't heardhaven't heardhaven't heardthis is okthis is pretty goodi like thisundeniably awesomepretty great imohaven't heard
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
no you misunderstand, I am crying for you and the awesomeness you are missing out on for not liking NY hipsters who channel Robert Smith filtered over a rock/disco band
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, August 11, 2009 3:42 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
this is almost incomprehensibly meta-snarky
-
i actually like all the pitchfork year-enders. i think they all (except maybe the microphones) come out of a kind of 'so, what record did all the pitchfork writers have somewhere between places four and twelve on their individual list' place
― thomp, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
Radiohead - Kid A <--- eh, haven't listened to it in yearsThe Microphones - The Glow pt 2<--- not since 03, as a freshman year alcoholicInterpol - Turn on the Bright Lights<--- loved this record when it came out, was done with it by the end of 03The Rapture - Echoes<--- jesus. january 04 was the last i heard this?Arcade Fire - Funeral<--- don't know anything about it.Sufjan Stevens - Illinois<--- dittoThe Knife - Silent Shout<--- was rapturous about it then, can't imagine listening to it now, but still great album etc.Panda Bear - Person Pitch<--- i started the thread on thisFleet FOxes - Fleet Foxes<--- who the fuck are fleet foxes?
also, i found my first post-- it was about the Magik Markers. lol.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)
i am making my own top 500 divided into 5 thus:
a) instrumentals (inc. hit singles)b) uk top 40 singles (not inc. instrumentals or remixes of the 'a-side')c) non-singles (albums and ep tracks but not remixes)d) remixes, re-edits, mixtracts mash-ups and other combinationse) other singles (not top 40)
cos i can
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 00:54 (sixteen years ago)
i'm kinda more interested in the token non indie that pitchfork, not tryin to deny them the right or anything, but what was crossover pitchfork-appealing?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 00:56 (sixteen years ago)
WHOA. do any of you remember Mickey?
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 01:06 (sixteen years ago)
Of course.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 01:09 (sixteen years ago)
Who's guessing this thing reaches 1000 posts before they even post the first song
― can au jus (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 01:10 (sixteen years ago)
i'm sorry, i 've gotten carried away looking at my history on ilx.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 01:13 (sixteen years ago)
this would appear to be my first post:
free jazz (or at least the idea of it; it's not like i know what i'm talking about) seems not so far from the basic squawky noises already heard in rock; listening to older jazz means getting accustomed to following chord changes and working out what's happening = in some ways more genuinely foreign than the stuff that (apparentlysupposedly) seemed impossibly far-out in the 60s(i don't think this process is anything to do with 'visceral emotion')
― t0m w3st, Monday, November 10, 2003 5:57 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
also they write about it in the wire― t0m w3st, Monday, November 10, 2003 6:00 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark
― thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:13 (sixteen years ago)
although bizarrely someone else with my name posted this on the missy elliott / fremma neppe venette thread:
u are all dense u know! ever heard of a shitty little windows program called sound recorder?? well record the part of the song that u r all arguin about and then play it back using the reverse function........and it blatantly says: "I put my thang down flip it and reverse it" if u dont believe me try it....and listen to all the people that bin tellin u that the whole time!!― T0m W3st, Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:18 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark
― thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:15 (sixteen years ago)
It's like this thread is promising to be the culmination of ILM.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)
My own first post ever references a Pitchfork review :-/
― cockles (country matters), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)
seeing someone on here a little older than myself getting thrashed for his indie earnestness makes me wonder how I survived you cranks.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:50 (sixteen years ago)
My favourite review of recent weeks has to be Cokemachineglow's staunch and beautifully-written defence of Bitter Tea. I'll get back to y'all with my all-time favourites... (and the winner, without a shadow of a doubt, is Pitchfork on Obie Trice, simultaneously the greatest and yet most awful single piece of music writing...ever)
I've written my own (IMO quite wittily-observed) spoof review but I'm not sure how I could post it here...
― L0uis J4gger (Haberdager), Wednesday, 26 July 2006 21:30 (3 years ago) Bookmark
― cockles (country matters), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 02:51 (sixteen years ago)
I thought ILM hated Pitchfork.
But I am sure Pitchfork will do the opposite you see on this thread. Just to piss ILM off. And then things go full circle
― Shin Oliva Suzuki, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 03:22 (sixteen years ago)
Uhhhh... like half of ILM writes for Pitchfork.
― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 04:00 (sixteen years ago)
"And I will stir up ILXor against ILXor, brother will troll brother..."
― Cunga, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 04:45 (sixteen years ago)
i'm a BIG fan of kshighway! keep doing what you are doing as i'm doing just fine with my love of indie music on ILM.
this might be the first post i made on this thing called ILM:
slowdive: classic or dud?#
I’m still brand new but wanted to chime in, though I find it strange that you guys have all these classic or duds posts.
I would say classic but happen to really like a lot of stuff that came out around that time and would not put dud next to many bands except something like Curve. I also think its silly to compare Slowdive to Mojave 3 because they are very different bands. Mojave 3 are often overlooked because of the former but I think they are also really good. The best M3 album, IMO, happens to be Out Of Tune with the glorious “This Road I’m Travelling.” I will agree that Rachel’s album is just kind of there because I never listen to it. Neil’s album, on the other hand, is quite good though it does have a few fillers. I even think I listened to it more than the last M3 album. I was on slsk last week and Neil Halstead happened to be hanging out in one of the rooms. I joined the room after he was already chatting and was wondering why everyone was acting so strange. He was having computer problems and left. So I was writing about this on a music message board I usually post at, than low and behold he came back. He was saying that he is going to have a new solo album come out in February. I tried to say hi but his computer was having problems and I never got a word in edge wise.
Moose are brilliant and will have to disagree with most of you on this thread again. The reason I say that is because they became better once they put away their petals, though I love that stuff as well. Moose turned into one of the best bands of the 1990’s once they mellowed out.
-Bee
― BeeOK (BeeOK), Friday, November 26, 2004 8:37 PM (4 years ago)
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 05:18 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, Bee OK, for the encouragement and for sharing your first post!
― kshighway, Friday, 14 August 2009 02:56 (sixteen years ago)
So they've put up 500 - 201 of the tracks list and they don't have commentary. Makes you wonder why they didn't just do a top 200 instead.
― Number None, Monday, 17 August 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)
srsly stop this "aughts" nonsense
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)
Wow. I thought that having the song samples right next to the list could have been cool, but then I have to "sign up to activate the music player"? No thanks.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 17 August 2009 11:29 (sixteen years ago)
even worse, i actually tried to sign up: "only available in the US" well f u then
― sonderangerbot, Monday, 17 August 2009 11:42 (sixteen years ago)
The 500 song list seems a bit pointless. For a start it's too many songs for a "list", and the choices have obviously come from a huge range of people with totally different tastes. So there's no sense whatsoever of reasoning or unity... Is Yellow by Coldplay really better than Carry Me Ohio by Sun Kil Moon? They may as well have just picked 500 random songs. Yo.
― Wax Cat, Monday, 17 August 2009 11:54 (sixteen years ago)
yo?
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Monday, 17 August 2009 11:55 (sixteen years ago)
Just thought I'd add a Yo, it was all getting a bit serious back there.
― Wax Cat, Monday, 17 August 2009 11:55 (sixteen years ago)
appreciate it
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 12:00 (sixteen years ago)
back there, 5 minutes ago, in a post
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 12:00 (sixteen years ago)
Callin' out by real names.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 17 August 2009 12:04 (sixteen years ago)
the choices have obviously come from a huge range of people with totally different tastes.
this is a really good thing tho
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 13:31 (sixteen years ago)
lots of great songs in 300-201. toss the first four pages.
― abanana, Monday, 17 August 2009 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
Really? I kind of felt like it declined in quality as it went along, though I like it all so far.
― Popper, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
The parlor game here is to figure out who gave each of the non-blurbed tracks their one nomination.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 14:07 (sixteen years ago)
good luck with that?
― thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
OK it's really more like "which of my friends picked the tracks I actually like?"
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 14:10 (sixteen years ago)
though I really do hope we get to see individual contributors' lists at the end of this; they're always more interesting.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 14:11 (sixteen years ago)
The 500 song list seems a bit pointless. For a start it's too many songs for a "list", and the choices have obviously come from a huge range of people with totally different tastes. So there's no sense whatsoever of reasoning or unity...
Maybe, but I don't see the problem. I mean, it isn't as though including Track Nos. 500 -- 201 somehow adversely impacted the selection of the Top 200 Tracks. And seeing the rest of the list identified songs I had overlooked, some of which I'll sample and maybe love.
Is Yellow by Coldplay really better than Carry Me Ohio by Sun Kil Moon?
NO.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 14:26 (sixteen years ago)
god, what a boring decade.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)
Actually, yes it is.
Anyone want to venture a guess at which songs will make the top ten?
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 17 August 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
though I really do hope we get to see individual contributors' lists at the end of this; they're always more interesting.― Matos W.K., Monday, August 17, 2009 10:11 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Matos W.K., Monday, August 17, 2009 10:11 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
HAPPY FOURTH TIME SOMEONE'S SAID THAT IN THIS THREAD!!!!
http://pages.prodigy.net/rallenmiller/balloons.jpg
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)
Immediate thoughts:
Battles - AtlasAntony and the Johnsons - Hope There's SomeoneJT - My Love
xpost
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 17 August 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)
I can't believe how bored this list made me.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
Top 10 will include:
Hey Ya Paper Planes
Something from Ys, and something from Kid A...
― Wax Cat, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
If Paper Planes makes the top 10 then good lord I'll be speechless with indignation
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
Haagan-Dazs is better than Ys.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
lol I was just thinking how good a decade it's been for music. De gustibus non est disputandum.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
You guys can complain all day, but the list has Baby's "What Happened To That Boy" in my head all morning, so I have no problem with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX6rC1krGp0
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)
PR-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R-R
guys this list is SO BORING that billstevejim might actually post a THIRD TIME about it
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)
I enjoyed lots of music this decade, but only a small percentage of it was represented between 500 and 201 on this thing.
The lala clips are significantly slowing down my computer and I can't even listen to them.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
tbh i just care about individual writers' lists
― mark cl, Monday, 17 August 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
these boring lala clips on this page that i keep refreshing are so boring that i'm vacillating between my rabid desire to hear them and comment and how bored I am― billstevejim, Monday, August 17, 2009 10:58 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― billstevejim, Monday, August 17, 2009 10:58 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
only a small percentage of the music i like is ever represented on a list made by someone else. i'd have to make the list for it to have all stuff i like.
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
I'm happy "Uzi" made the cut.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:04 (sixteen years ago)
I'm sorry that my boredom offends you.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)
this thread is already depressing and is going to get worse but i just can't look away.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:07 (sixteen years ago)
Awww, Whiney's on a "tear" again.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
will whiney have his list posted on the individual writers' lists?
― mark cl, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
gah i'm not doing very well with this joke guys
maybe whiney can just start a thread about his 500 favorite songs of the decade and we'll see who it bores.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:10 (sixteen years ago)
should only be allowed if he does it in his twitter style imo
― thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:15 (sixteen years ago)
TRUE CONFESSIONS:
I actually really want to be listening to some of these P2k Lala tracks that I didn't hear/don't remember, but I'm so far behind on my Twitter project that I have to listen to Fabolous and Thrice instead today#zerothworldproblems
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)
That list has some good stuff on it. Especially delighted by that Twilight Sad song...it's incendiary and more people need to hear it.
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)
Fabolous just said, "I'm not that pregnant white girl but Ju-know" #fuckmylife
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)
speechless? you promise? arf
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)
pitchfork, more like, dont know anything about music fork
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)
right
right guys
but does it bore you, that's the real question.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:24 (sixteen years ago)
I know at least 51 ways to make jagger speechless with indignation
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
pitchfork, more like, pitch-bore-k, because its boring
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
top fifty does not contain ulver, also suggest ban
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
damn cant believe the top fifty doesnt contain ulver
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
way to lose all credibility pitchfork
btw i got an advance copy of the list--#1 song is by mansun louis
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
so u should be happy
dullver, my mother claims
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
more like sucks-ver
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
mansun's 00's output is not exactly stunning...i am speechless with indignation
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
i was so bored I fell asleep and had the worst nightmare that i was posting on a boring message board where people wouldn't stop talking about how boring things were, and everyone kept screaming "individual writers lists" at the top of their lungs, and max was there making fun of everyone and a pervert was crying about ulver. So glad I woke up!
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
i hope when the list comes out we can choose the top 200 posts on this thread
― max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
how dare you whiney - i am not actually serious abt ulver
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
You keep dreaming that I was screaming at the top of my lungs about anything.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, August 17, 2009 11:18 AM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol i've had that fuckin' line stuck in my head all morning
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
"Individual lists are more interesting" has become such a cliche, I wonder if people actually believe it. I do like looking at individual writers' lists, especially those of people I know, and it does provide a useful context for the amalgamated list, but is it more interesting? I dunno, a good deal of my fascination with lists like these is in how they solidify canons. Even if we can predict some of the albums that will be in the top 10 or top 20, my overall understanding of what was considered important by the indie world this decade is still kind of inchoate at this point, and I look forward to the final results to get a better bead on it. Plus, even if you're looking at this list from a purely pragmatic standpoint -- as a way to get turned on to stuff you haven't heard -- wouldn't you rather rely on songs or albums that have demonstrated consensus appeal than a vote in the middle of a random writer's ballot?
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
i agree w/ this, in that i dont really care abt random writer's ballots - i just usually look out for the writers that i already care abt.
― just sayin, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
I guess I didn't think I had to spell this out, but this is exactly what I mean.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)
Well, sure, I'm going to glance with interest at the ballots of writers I know and like. But the iTunes playlist I make will be Pitchfork's Best of the 2000s, not [nabisco] [.]'s Best of the 2000s.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
(Haha, I just wanted to see if it still auto-corrected Nabisco's name.)
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
Well the writer lists are nowhere near as long as the final list, so making playlists from the ones I'm interested in wouldn't be that difficult anyway.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 16:01 (sixteen years ago)
[nabisco] [.]
― mark cl, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
haha
DUMPLINGS!
whoa it's not only on that particular thread
tracks i am especially happy to see on the list:N.E.R.D. "Run To The Sun"Cee-Lo "I'll Be Around"Madonna "Don't Tell Me"Freeway "Flipside"Rich Boy "Throw Some D's"Ted Leo "Timorous Me"
ones that aren't bad but i'm kinda scratching my head why they bothered to single them out:The Roots "Don't Feel Right"Lil Kim "The Jump Off"Alicia Keys "You Don't Know My Name (Reggae Remix)" <--- over the original!?Beanie Sigel "Feel It In The Air"Missy Elliott "Pass That Dutch"Dinosaur Jr. "Almost Ready"Outkast "The Whole World"
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
ok "Pass That Dutch" is straight up bad
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
rong
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
I don't hate "Dutch" but it is kind of puzzling to see there.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)
Alicia Keys "You Don't Know My Name (Reggae Remix)" <--- over the original!?
Maybe the original is higher up. (I feel the same way about Dntel's "This Is the Dream" not being the Superpitcher remix.)
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno -- it seems like Pitchfork takes the opposite stance of P&J, in that if there's any minor support for a remix or alternate version of a song, that gets the nod instead of the original
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)
i would make a case for Pass That Dutch. it's faster more intense beat and relentless heavy bass that was just the same note three times gave it something that e.g. Work It doesn't have. Work It is probably better overall but on its own terms ...Dutch is as fun as anything.
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)
i kinda feel like when doing lists like this, where you know a key singles artist of the era like Missy is going to be represented more than once, you still have to be selective and include only their very best. i don't think that song's among her very best by a long shot.
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
and probably one of her better songs for that pure GOTTA DANCE impulse xp
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
As ILM's foremost Wilco expert, I have a bone to pick with this fucking list!
#411 is "Handshake Drugs." OK, awesome.
But the album art shown is for the More Like The Moon EP and the year is 2003. The More Like The Moon EP did come out in 2003, but it contained a completely different version of "Handshake Drugs" than the one on A ghost is born. The embedded audio file is from A ghost is born. Either Pitchfork's writers like the inferior version on the EP and put up the wrong audio file, or the album artwork and date are RONG.
That being said, A++ P4k for putting this together. It's fascinating to look through.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
i dunno -- it seems like Pitchfork takes the opposite stance of P&J, in that if there's any minor support for a remix or alternate version of a song, that gets the nod instead of the original― some dude, Monday, August 17, 2009 12:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― some dude, Monday, August 17, 2009 12:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I mean, this is the way to make platinum artists still seem like elitist/hip/contarian/indie choices. It isn't just p4k that does this...
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
ILM disagrees with you!
This Is Not A Poll!: The Missy Elliott Singles Poll.
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, as soon as any song leaks--even something as benign as Das Racist--blogs fight to stake claim to the "best" remix
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
it's meme economy tactics
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
and i'm not singling out pfork. everyone does this now.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
x(...)post
Also, according to my knowledge + Wikipedia, "Handshake Drugs" was never formally released as a single. Guessing that doesn't matter so much here.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
i'm glad they used the lego sleeve for the B&S song
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
I really love how you can stream all the embedded songs. "Fake Palindromes!" Yes 2005!
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
spotify playlist: http://bit.ly/vSElp
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
@kshighway: It's probably my favorite song on A Ghost Is Born, fwiw. (Although I did listen to "At Least That's What You Said" the other day because of you -- I'd forgotten how good the guitar solo is.)
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
Handshake Drugs is my favourite Wilco song period (well, IATTBYH and Poor Places give it a good run) and I'm glad it's here.
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
@jaymc: "Handshake Drugs" is such a good song!
And that's so awesome that you re-listened to ALTWYS and liked the guitar solo. It's one of my favorite songs, ever.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
seriously I will smack you guys if you keep doing tweet-style referencing of each other
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)
It's THE NOW, man.
― Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
HAHAHA. @HI DERE: Will comply, sir!
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
I guess including the album version of Handshake Drugs means the live version on the Kicking Television album won't be on the list. That's a shame, because it's a very different song in that live performance. Both versions are good.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Daniel, I had come to accept your italicizing of song titles as a personal affectation, but I hadn't realized that you put album titles in roman. I just don't know about that.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
haha a couple months ago i saw someone on ilx do a twitter-style reply to someone and was like "please god no please don't let this become standard"
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
I try to be consistent with formatting, but I often forget how I'd done it before and default to whatever I think looks right at the moment. It's one of my many -- many, many -- failings. (xp).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)
Heh, no big deal, I'm a copy editor, so I probably notice these things more than most.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)
u gais are sooo cute :)
― Anatomy of a Morbius (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)
I like a lot of the things on this list and am intrugied by many of the things I've not heard = it's going to be better than most end of decade lists I'll see. People seem to just be complaining for the sake of complaining.
― fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)
― it's like i have a couple worked up vadges under my arms (HI DERE), Monday, August 17, 2009 12:20 PM (59 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i don't understand how a poll where "Pass That Dutch" got one vote contradicts my view that it's not her best wrok
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)
failed mainstreaming of indie music imo
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
476. Ward 21"Petrol"
nice
― butthurt (deej), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
222. Three 6 Mafia"Sippin' on Some Syrup"[Loud/Relativity; 2000]
this is way way way too low
― butthurt (deej), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)
219. Lil Mama"Lip Gloss"[Zomba; 2007]
i mean i liked this song but three ahead of 'sippin'??
― butthurt (deej), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)
thank god it was not four
― cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)
not to be all "placements don't matter w/ any big list" but i think you're better off not really paying attention to those numbers and just asking whether something is on the list at all or not.
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:22 (sixteen years ago)
So, a surprising amount of stuff I like in the top 300, and a surprising amount of stuff I have never and hopefully will never hear. A few notes:
- J0hn D., "Death Metal Band.." got #230 !!! that and "No Children" were the first of your songs i ever heard. i still sing both in the shower all the time.
- ugh, the fact that they picked something from We Are Monster, and "Schrapnell" at that, is incredibly disappointing. Western Store and Rest are about a million times better as albums.
- lol at two Villalobos drops in the top 300.
- WHY ARE THERE NO TRACKS BY LOW? if they don't put something from Things We Lost in the Fire or Trust in the top 200, i will be totally shocked and disappointed.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)
yeah let's not do any "NO TRACKS BY ____" posts until the whole thing is up
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)
sorry. i just was slightly shocked.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
WHY ARE THERE NO TRACKS BY LOW?Because the list is aesthetically retarded so far.
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
"- ugh, the fact that they picked something from We Are Monster, and "Schrapnell" at that, is incredibly disappointing. Western Store and Rest are about a million times better as albums."
... this is not a list of albums...?
― butthurt (deej), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)
― some dude, Monday, August 17, 2009 2:29 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)
deej, i know. but if i'm right, there won't be another Isolee track on the list. and if any track should be on it, i would say "I Owe You" or "Lost".
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)
Well, sure, I'm going to glance with interest at the ballots of writers I know and like. But the iTunes playlist I make will be Pitchfork's Best of the 2000s, not nabisco.'s Best of the 2000s.― jaymc,
― jaymc,
jaymc is making a playlist about pitchfork's best of the 2000s.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
who isn't!
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
No Nate Dogg, no credibility.
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I have playlists for Pitchfork's top songs for every year since 2004, Stylus's top songs from 2003 to 2007, Stylus's top 50 of 2000-04, the Pitchfork 500, etc. (Not all are completely filled out, but I usually make an attempt to download the stuff I don't have.)
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)
tbh i will cry foul if there's no "The Next Episode" or "Can't Deny It"
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)
I also made Stylus playlists. Makes me really sad they're gone. They should try and reunite the staff for a non paid one time only end of the decade feature.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)
306. Dr. Dre [ft. Kurupt, Snoop Dogg, and Nate Dogg]"The Next Episode"[Aftermath/Interscope; 2000]
― fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)
That'll teach me to actually look at p4k. Or not.
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)
my bad, saw that earlier but forgot it
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)
I just happened to be reading the list as you started complaining about lack of nate dogg. don't really care that much either way. it's a good list, i can't name a solo nate dogg single, not really deserving a giant bloody thread imo but it's pitchfork and some folks gotta get annoyed at what other folks on the same message board they talk to about music every day make a list about.
― fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)
most people can't name a solo nate dogg single, that's not what he's known for
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)
Careful what you wish for.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)
nate dogg is a feeling
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
thanking u
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
I also made Stylus playlists. Makes me really sad they're gone. They should try and reunite the staff for a non paid one time only end of the decade feature.________________________Careful what you wish for― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy)
________________________
Careful what you wish for
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy)
That's as cryptic as when you said, in response to rumors that Stylus was closing, "I'm still writing."
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 17 August 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
Shh!
― Anatomy of a Morbius (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
best album of the nil years. amnesiac. by a million light years. this album captured the spirit of the decade. the decade of angst & insecurity. it started with 911 and finished with the end of the market. i still cannot believe that the world still seems to be more or less ok right now. stress on seems, i guess.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
When hasn't a decade been defined by angst and insecurity?
― Anatomy of a Morbius (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think there are enough words in the English language for me to adequately express how strongly I disagree with you, Alex.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
best album of the nineties. color me badd. by a million light years. this album captured the spirit of the decade. the decade of angst & insecurity. it started with desert storm and finished with the stock market hitting 10,000. i still cannot believe that the world still seems to be more or less ok right now. stress on seems, i guess.
― WFB, looking out at you with twinkling eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
amnesiac sucks btw.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
best album of the nineties. sublime. by a million light years. this album captured the spirit of the decade. the decade of angst & insecurity. it started with flannel shirts and finished with black trenchcoats. i still cannot believe that the world still seems to be more or less ok right now. stress on seems, i guess.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, alex, Amnesiac really isn't that good. sorry.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
i mean i hate to slam someone's (apparent) sincerity but tbh "the decade in music" is an absurd exercise and at best will serve to remind us of random shit we forgot about from 2003 or something.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
gotta say i would not have predicted any longtime poster gunning for kshighway's spot on this thread
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
alex is right. Amnesiac *is* the best album of the decade.
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
No he isn't. Amnesiac is a fucking shambles with several great songs and a bunch of blindingly pretentious, half-assed bullshit on it.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, you really have to be a Radiohead fanboy to hold alex's opinion.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)
cone toaster is probably awesome, but at the height of my black dice mania I never heard it, so I don't really think about it when I think of Black Dice but it's considered their big one tho really right? just wondering if I should expect to see smiling off or manoman or something
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)
^^^ most suggest banable post of the decade
― WFB, looking out at you with twinkling eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
i'm glad we're getting a jumpstart on the Radiohead pissing match that this thread will inevitably become
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)
I'm out of breath from my practice run.
― WFB, looking out at you with twinkling eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
Well no one else cares about The Cure anymore and the rest of this is boring so I've got to entertain myself somehow!
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
gotta say i would not have predicted any longtime poster gunning for kshighway's spot on this thread― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:38 (12 minutes ago)
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:38 (12 minutes ago)
Shit, I hope I'm not out of a job.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)
The one thing you very, very, very rarely see someone post in response to anything I post: OTM. I am the anti-nabisco.
This is not a role to aspire to.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
I am the anti-nabisco.
Actually Mr Snrub is the anti-nabisco, sorry.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
uh, maybe wait around a while before you start assigning yourself roles dude.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
amnesiac is not the best album of the decade but it is pretty good imo. happy to share my opinion wrt this matter
― mark cl, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
haha ks can't get a break. don't even try to define yourself until we've made up our minds!!
― some dude, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
lol, was trying to be nice and all, maybe don't tell us all that you don't have a clue or we'll just take it for granted
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)
I'm just trolling Snrub
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
that's nice
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
dude used sockpuppets tho
― velko, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
http://shallmakenolaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/toughguy.jpg
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
u guys, have I told you I have horns and a dragon tattoo on my back?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)
I know, right?
― WFB, looking out at you with twinkling eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
i am just listening to amnesiac. and while i still like it lots i have to admit something. it doesn't sound as grim, as apocalyptic, as devastating as it sounded in 2001. i guess that has to do with the fact that the world has changed in the meantime. it has overtaken amnesiac in the respect of gloominess. on the other hand. no future has been the credo of my generation, i.e. punk. and there always has been a kind of future. anyways which other album could possibly capture the spirit of the decade?
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
There isn't an album that can capture the spirit of this decade. We won't even know what the spirit of this decade is until 20 years have passed and we've forgotten all the details.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
dubstep
― gucci in manehattan (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)
"dubstep"
― gucci in manehattan (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
After this last time, I'm just going to ignore attacks on me, because it's a waste of time, words, and good thread real estate.
Look, I do have a clue. I'm younger than most of you, and I know less about music than most of you, but I'm making a good faith effort to contribute what I do know here and not get too down about being attacked all the time. The second thing becomes easier as I realize that's just how shit goes here. (I have been on forums in the past where it wasn't an accepted sport for posters to be dicks to each other.)
Anyway, I'm just going to keep trying, and I will become more OTM over time. I will also dispense more Wilco knowledge to the ILM collective, promise.
From this point on, I am not going to deal with haters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzXcNgCr0nk
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)
what spirit of the decade? it's like you're grasping for straws that ceased to exist a while ago.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)
gahhhhhh this fuckin thread.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)
this thread
― Mordy, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
― mark cl, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
http://weonsikecsd.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/bike_crash1.jpg
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.cameronmcewan.com/projects/magazine/culture_blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/neckbeard.jpg
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
needs a blingee
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
60 mph on ks highway
― gucci in manehattan (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
Spirit of the decade = this post...
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/51285/thumbs/s-OBAMAECONOMIC-large.jpg
this picture is really cracking me up its like a dream bush is having abt when everything works out just how he planned and all his colorful friends are congratulating him
― ice cr?m, Monday, December 1, 2008 12:05 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
imo.
― fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
amnesiac sucks btwyeah probably. but not more than this decade.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
Awww, don't give in that easily.
― Melissa W, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)
it really doesn't, alex. we've just forgotten we're conversing in the parallel universe in which tuneless/amusical taylor swift is OMGAMZING and liking RH is unfashionable.
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)
shit is getting heated
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)
taylor swift is tuneless/amusical? there is a lot of potential criticism you could launch at her but that just seems way off
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
dudes, even when i listened to radiohead a lot, i thought amnesiac was mostly a load of pretentious bullshit.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
taylor swift vs. radiohead poll plz
― velko, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
(xpost) Yeah, seriously. I don't even particularly like "Love Story" that much, but it gets stuck in my head something fierce.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
Taylor Swift's suckiness has nothing to do with her alleged (and demonstrably false) "tunelessness" and everything to do with her not being a very good singer and being a glamorized version of the young white female ideal singing about how she's an ugly duckling who can't get the guy.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
pretentious and unmusical are the two criticisms of music I do not get. Especially pretentious, kinda think pretentiousness is the precondition for awesomeness wrt music.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, August 17, 2009 9:34 PM (5 seconds ago)
have you ever heard the phrase "tv ugly"?
Taylor Swift's suckiness has nothing to do with her alleged (and demonstrably false) "tunelessness" and everything to do with her not being a very good singer and being a glamorized version of the young white female ideal singing about how she's an ugly duckling who can't get the guy.― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, August 17, 2009 3:34 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, August 17, 2009 3:34 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark
The whole ugly duckling thing is interesting insofar as she is so clearly NOT an ugly duckling.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
Where's that Taylor Swift is a rat photo?
― Mordy, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, and she's not even that, is my point.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)
amnesiac isn't that pretentious, it's just a mashed together, poorly-conceived selection of crap they were working around around the time of kid a. there is nothing particularly memorable about any of it.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)
weird how the exact moment I decide that Taylor Swift is great she becomes a poster girl for post-contrarian meta-challop 2009
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)
"Pyramid Song" and "Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors" are memorable IMO, but those two songs can't carry the rest of the album.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)
xp: I was slightly warming to Taylor Swift until I saw that horrifying duet she did with Miley Cyrus.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)
XXP
http://www.furia.com/all-idols/2007/1096.htmlhttp://www.furia.com/all-idols/2008/382.html
― Mordy, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
um, okay
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)
shrug. just saying.
― Mordy, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
oh okay, awesome!
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
kudos for voting for two albums I couldn't possibly care less about
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
i can remember how knives out goes and can sort of remember pyramid song.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
i remember when ok computer was kindof a big deal
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)
but i don't give in at all, melissa. i was ironic. or understating. or whatever. there was neither one solid argument against amnesiac as album of the decade nor any serious argument for another record. that says it all, doesn't it? btw my track of the decade would either be pyramid song or knives out. aqny other songs which have engraved themselves in the human cortex like those two? i haven't heard them. but if you have, tell me i am open for music which breaks frontiers. i really don't get that amnesiac bashing at all. pretentious would be a band like yes or elp in the 70s but not radiohead's amnesiac.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
"tuneless" is more like it.
― WFB, looking out at you with twinkling eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
ENGRAVED THEMSELVES IN YOUR HUMAN CORTEX, MORAN. for christ's sake.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
There was no serious argument because it was a stupid statement and people were trying to not be flat-out insulting towards you for being so feeble.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
maybe i would have an opinion on whether or not it is the album of the decade, but I have never heard it because I am too busy listening to Taylor Swift albums just so u no
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
don't u get it dan? it's our fault.
wtf do you want alex? me to tell you which songs from this decade i found more memorable than knives out? do you have like three days to spare?
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
I won't make an argument against or for Amnesiac as the album of the decade, but it's definitely my personal favorite and will sit atop any decade list that I make.
x-post
Jesus, Dan.
― Melissa W, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
u guys, the individual writers list will probably be more interesting tho
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
i eagerly await these interesting lists.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)
lol i just realized that "interesting lists" is a rad oxymoron.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
uh i was joking btw individual ppl are retards for real
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
if you don't think this is better than anything on Amnesiac, i have no use for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSUfN4vmYzc
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
Melissa, fwiw I have a lot more respect for "this is my favorite album of the decade" than I do for "this is the best album of the decade". The latter is reflective of your personal aesthetic and what you bring to the table when you listen to music; the latter does not exist.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, August 17, 2009 4:51 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark
lol yeah wisdom of crowds all the way my dude.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
you can have no use for me, either, it's okay.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
x-posts amass
taylor swift doesn't ring a bell. any youtube link or something? are you serious about amnesiac? i hope not. and dan why are you so aggressive? just propose another album. you told me what you think of my fave of the nils and i wouldn't mind to tell you what i think about yours.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)
yeah HI DERE otm. alex doesn't seem to understand the subjectivity of this MY FAVORITE THINGS POLL.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
Ehhh I don't think so. Me writing "XX is the best album of the decade" is the same as saying "XX is my favorite album of the decade."
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)
it's even the same as writing, "X is the best album of the decade."
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
in a way, you're right, alfred, but in another way, i agree with the hi dere.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)
deeply outraged that the pitchfascists havent included a single video game track or youtbue vid yet ~~~ hopefully theyre just waiting for the top 15
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, Dan, but this entire thread is full of people declaring this-and-that the best of the decade and the claws didn't come out for those. Best=favorite for most people, and jumping down Alex's throat because he didn't couch his opinion in enough IMO IMO IMO IMO is pretty ridiculous.
― Melissa W, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)
oh ffs "best" and "favorite" are interchangeable w/r/t opinions, are we still having this argument?
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
ps i h8 all the songs listed so far
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)
haha whoops xpost, cue Whiney JUMPING UP AND DOWN AND POSTING .JPGS about it
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monda
yeah i mean if Tay Zonday doesn't get like number 8 i'm gonna cut ryan's balls off.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)
<3 Lamp
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)
Tay Zonday actually put out a solid single a few years ago called "Can't Dance":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3aA1Hy17A8
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
^ how can you not love this dude
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
"X is the best album of the decade" = "X is my favorite album of the decade," sure. But "X is the only album which has engraved itself on the human cortex" doesn't seem quite as elastic.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
omg. why.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfLAv3JHRwY
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
no we can't lock this, this entire thread is making me laugh my ass off.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
Because ILM is otherwise utterly free of hyperbole!
― Melissa W, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
I know, right?: That video is amazing.
― kshighway, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hil1F2T19GY&feature=related
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)
"X is the best album of the decade" = "X is my favorite album of the decade," sure. But "X is the only album which has engraved itself on the human cortex" doesn't seem quite as elastic
How 'bout "X is the only album which has wrapped itself around my thighs like a lithe tendon."
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)
that kinda reminds me of the music from nausicaa
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.hamienet.com/Penis-Song-sheet-music-page_26996-2-1.png
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)
Can we all agree that this needs to be on the list?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfCmYyG-yg4
― I am the anti-nabisco (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)
That's fine, they're your thighs.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)
and dan why are you so aggressive? just propose another album. you told me what you think of my fave of the nils and i wouldn't mind to tell you what i think about yours.
I'm aggressive because I really, really, really dislike Amnesiac as an album. I think it was as hastily put together as Kid A with material that wasn't as strong and not nearly as cohesive. Furthermore, I thought that Hail To The Thief is a better album than either.
Right now, I don't have a favorite album of the decade. There's too much music that's come out that I really, really enjoyed. The ones that stay on my mind the most, for various reasons, are:
Portishead - ThirdMIA - KalaThe Knife - Silent ShoutThe Cure - 4:13 DreamThe Cure - BloodflowersDepeche Mode - Playing the AngelModeselektor - Hello Mom!Erykah Badu - New Amerykah Part One (4th World War)Nelly Furtado - LooseBat For Lashes - Two MoonsSantigold - s/tYeah Yeah Yeahs - It's BlitzPoem-Cees - ParanoiaOutkast - StankoniaRadiohead - Hail To The ThiefNine Inch Nails - Year Zero RemixedNine Inch Nails - With TeethBoards of Canada - Music Has A Right To ChildrenKenna - New Sacred CowMissy Elliott - Under ConstructionThe Mountain Goats - Heretic PrideThe Mountain Goats - TallahasseeBasement Jaxx - Kish KashLupe Fiasco - Lupe Fiasco's The CoolThom Yorke - The Eraser
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)
Too true. It would be hard to do it right until you have at least eight months go by after the end of 2009 to even pretend to get any perspective. I don't know if I'll be able to get in the right frame of mind to try before then. I'm currently in a metal & stoner rock phase!
― Fastnbulbous, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWQdltUMid4
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)
I'm currently in a metal & stoner rock phase!
Then you've already got the spirit of hipsters circa 2006.
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)
Whiney, what should we be listening to right now?
― I am the anti-nabisco (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)
also in response to this: Yeah, Dan, but this entire thread is full of people declaring this-and-that the best of the decade and the claws didn't come out for those. Best=favorite for most people, and jumping down Alex's throat because he didn't couch his opinion in enough IMO IMO IMO IMO is pretty ridiculous.
I just started reading this thread! There's no fucking way I'm going back and killing my browser trying to read the entire thing.
And Matos, I'm going to beat the drum for explicitly acknowledging subjectivity until the day I die because lack of precision in ones usage of language makes everyone dumber and easier to misunderstand.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)
frankly, i'm a little shocked that a thread about pitchfork's decade in music retrospective devolves into fighting about radiohead.
thankfully someone was around to suggest that a popular rap song was better than radiohead.
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)
u need twitter bro.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IphR3A64VI
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
on amnesiac there is not only pyramid song and knives out but there is also like spinning plates. three pretty great songs if you ask me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQBDsNiCCNM
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
I'm on Twitter! I follow Whiney's feed.
― I am the anti-nabisco (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
Go back through the archives; I've hated "Like Spinning Plates" since the album came out!
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
it's nice to see the sarcasm dripping, m@tt.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
i need to do a "reccommended" post, but I'm blastin the new Pissed Jeans on the regular.
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, Whiney. I'm going to check that out.
― I am the anti-nabisco (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)
Dan, i'm surprised that We Shall All Be Healed didn't beat out Tallahassee on that list of yours....but maybe that's because the former sort of changed my life.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:17 (sixteen years ago)
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, August 17, 2009 9:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
xpost i mean, i think that song is great table but this more feels like we're doing a ILM Challops Greatest Hits of the decade I mean....c'mon...but you know, for old tyme's sake i guess
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:18 (sixteen years ago)
I considered listing it but I listen to the other two a lot more.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:19 (sixteen years ago)
oh yeah, matt, i know the feeling. i am just bored and in my house on a crappy weather day.
and dan, i understand that-- haven't listened to it in a while myself, mostly because i got over my heavy addictions.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)
vs.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)
oh shit you caught me!
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
anyway: I'm for explicit subjectivity too but I think on a thread like this it's not that big a deal
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)
or rather, it's automatically implied.
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
i would also like to point out that alex mainhattan has a problem with Mark Hollis' voice, yet no problem with Yorke's. that, IMO, is cloth-eared.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
in fairness, I would not have been as big of a dick about it if I didn't really, really have a chip on my shoulder re: Amnesiac
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
x-post, a dick u are not ;-)
think positive, dan. i don't care about the music you don't care about. maybe nobody does. i am not sure if i care about the music you love. maybe if you have got some solid arguments. probably not. vitriol is not something i am especially attracted to. if this was the 1st thread i had met you on ilm i'd have thought that you are a dick. i have been around for a while and i know you are not.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
Actually I'm backpedalling too far here.
The thing that set me off was partially the mention of Amnesiac but mostly the idea that a single album can sum up a decade. I think that kind of signposting short-changes the breadth of music that comes out over a ten-year period and calls for willfull disregard for the vast diversity of human experience; no matter what you pick, you are de facto ignoring a non-trivial segment of the human population. It strikes me as nonthinking in a precise manner that makes me ballistic. I really hate that type of discourse and my first impulse is to stamp on it until it dies.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)
You are such a fucking liberal.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
(j/k)
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, have the past ten years of your life REALLY been so monochromatic and stagnant that you can sum it up with one album? The notion is not only inconceivable to me, it's repugnant.
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
you sum up your life with albums?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
yes they have and the album is In the Zone (xp)
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)
oh man, yikes
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)
http://mousesafari.com/lowfives/images/foundimages/yikes2.jpg
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
haha wow is that a Curt Swan panel?
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)
What this decade's music really lacked was testosterone.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:45 (sixteen years ago)
yes yes big sweaty balls
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)
lots of great songs in 300-201. toss the first four pages.― abanana, Monday, August 17, 2009 1:34 PM (8 hours ago) Bookmark
OTM, although 350 through 301 isn't bad.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
looks like it. yay, another comics person. (well i'm not anymore, i used to be).
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)
mmm come to think of it I'm still not sure if the lack of big sweaty balls this decade is a good thing or a bad thing. But has to be better than having sensitive idiots spouting lines that sound as if they were lifted from hallmark cards. Right?
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)
What this decade's music really lacked was testosterone.― Moka, Monday, August 17, 2009 5:45 PM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Moka, Monday, August 17, 2009 5:45 PM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I mean '70s: punk'80s: hardcore/college rock'90s: grunge'00s: http://themiddledistancerunner.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/natalie-portman-and-devendra-banhart.jpg
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)
What this decade's music really lacked was testosterone.― Moka, Monday, August 17, 2009 9:45 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
There were various pockets of it here and there.. I noticed quite a lot of bands who are very good at copying styles and precisely emulating various production elements, but who can't write songs for shit.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:49 (sixteen years ago)
sorry 2003 lil jon proves the balls point wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSh_Oc78A4o
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)
Music with balls appeared more often in the decade's first half.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)
wow you dudes are really good at coming up with bullshit trends and then willfully ignoring anything that contradicts those "trends" huh
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:51 (sixteen years ago)
wait a second
you are all "music writers" aren't you
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
xpost - I'm surprised you consider college rock testosterony, Whiney. (Also, in numbers terms, I think testosterony stuff occupies a way larger portion of the rock landscape than hardcore ever did in the 80s.)
― nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
Are we talking about metaphorical balls here? Because I'm pretty sure that music (and especially music that pops up in lists like this) continues to be dominated by those with balls.
― Melissa W, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
kind of lolling at how hip-hop still apparently doesn't exist to some people
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)
ilm has always been about coming up with really pussy ways of saying music isn't tough enough
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
i am not talking about these things. i am talking about balls.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
Well, I should probably correct myself and state that the testosterone thing rings specially true when aimed towards white musicians. Hip-hop was for better or for worse the only measly escape for testosterone in the scene. But personally speaking it never got me pumped in the same way that a band like say... Pantera did in the 90's.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)
haha ditto
― Matos W.K., Monday, 17 August 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)
huh a dude who likes pantera doesn't like hip hop, wonder what's going on there
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
I'm not a dude. I'm a dudette. And I never said I didn't liked hiphop.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
I like almost every hiphop song listed so far.. I think it's really funny that "Throw Some D's" made it, but that's not a complaint.. I just think it's a funny song.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)
this decade had Chinese Democracy in it and that is surely all the testosterone req'd
― unban dictionary (blueski), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)
yeah but it seemed like underground metal was sort of one of the defining trends of this decade...plus all the nu-garage punk type shit goner records and all the nu-lo-fi shit...and neo pigfuck and stuff, like the last five years have felt pretty ballsy to me in terms of underground rock
but i guess i never understand what kind of "zeitgeist" is being referred to in these thread. cuz it's not really an underground zeitgeist, but it's not really a actual popular music zeitgeist either.
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)
xpost - I'm surprised you consider college rock testosterony, Whiney. (Also, in numbers terms, I think testosterony stuff occupies a way larger portion of the rock landscape than hardcore ever did in the 80s.)― nabisco, Monday, August 17, 2009 5:52 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― nabisco, Monday, August 17, 2009 5:52 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I mean, I know Morrissey/Cure axis or whatever was the major label sensitive side, but compare the "leading lights" of 80s indie with the 00s, and we have lost MAD TESTOSTERONE
80s: Jesus Lizard, Husker Du, Fugazi, Dino Jr, Black Flag, Sonic Youth, Replacements00s: Shins, Death Cab, Postal Service, Fleet Foxes, Modest Mouse
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)
Sufjan
M@tt is OTM, but that's more like the underground to the undergound since the biggest indie-label bands are wimp-rock with exposure that 80s indie could only dream of?
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i agree with m@tt on this non-balls zeitgeist you all say has spread: you ain't lookin for balls in the right places.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
dnr that there were only five bands in the 00s huh, weird how I haven't even heard of all of them (?)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
i'm saying if you had to name the 10 bands in each decade with the most exposure/rep
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
i know bands exist you dumb dicks
the bigger you get, the smaller your balls are.
― nice! he have the balls to say the truth! (the table is the table), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
indie rock steroids
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)
I think "college rock" for a lot of people isn't Our Band Could Be Your Life stuff as much as 10,000 Maniacs, R.E.M., XTC, etc. (I'm assuming this is where Nabisco was coming from.)
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)
Well naturally there has got to be people making music with balls somewhere but that's missing the point. I'm speaking about collective conciousness in here.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)
Actually Whiney has already exposed what I really meant in much better and clearer ways.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
xpost: Even still, I still would say REM and XTC have more balls than, say, Death Cab
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)
"80s: Jesus Lizard, Husker Du, Fugazi, Dino Jr, Black Flag, Sonic Youth, Replacements"
LOL this is some seriously revisionist OBCBYL shit. Stick to tweeting, kid.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
man this thread has been a "that's what she said" treasure trove.
yeah i basically get what you are saying whiney
but at the same time there's been a lot of bigger stuff that was *actual* popular like QOTSA or Daughtry or Nickelback or stuff like that that is waaay bigger than fleet foxes too
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, August 17, 2009 10:12 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hell yeah by far esp if you are talking early periods for both bands
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)
The idea that Jesus Lizard were a leading light of 80s indie (despite not releasing anything until 1989!) is just. . . wow.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i guess i think of touch & go as its own thing, or more in line with am rep and ruthless (the old non-rap ruthless)
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)
There's also the 'cock rock' thing in the 80's. Dont you forget.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)
Is this a why can't white people in 00s rock thing?
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)
There you go. It's not a lack of funk, it's a lack of testosterone.
― Moka, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)
i just don't understand why ppl keep paying attention to pitchfork style rock shit when there is always totally hot shit popping off on the rolling underground rock thread...it's like being a glutton for punishment!
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)
xp it's full of bullshit is what it is.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)
Helg3son generally brings hard law
― Reflex Gaffe (country matters), Wednesday, 25 February 2009 17:49 (5 months ago) Bookmark
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
Weren't people making these same stupid "why aren't indie kids rockin'" complaints ten years ago about post-rock too?
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)
Just think guys if that's TRUE then this is two successive decades of non-rocking-ness! If we have three then indie kids might not reproduce at all and entire generation of white people will die off!
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)
I see what you mean, Whiney. I don't want to comment too much cause I'm kinda currently writing about exactly this kind of thing(!!), so let me just say this: I don't know that any of these qualities ever really get "lost." They just assume different levels of importance or centrality for different audiences. (Like for instance the punk side and the poppy-indie side always exist, right -- sometimes they come together, like around some of the 80s/90s bands you named, and then sometimes they head off in opposite directions.) So it's hard for me to think just that "indie" changed -- I mean someone has always been doing poppy-strummy guitar indie -- and not think about things like, e.g., a lot of the punk lineage having spun off into a different audience this decade (like various types of screamo/emo/-core/etc.), or the same "sensitive" vs. "hardcore" tension playing out between those popular bands and noise kids, or whatever else. I dunno. In any case I tend to think it's all there, it just gets grouped differently, different things fight for the torch, seize it at different times, etc. (And yeah, I understand that what you're basically saying is "I wish something a little tougher could grab that torch for 'indie' right now.")
― nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)
i'd agree with that
― hersheyshighway (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)
We need another Nirvana because indie rock is basically hair metal.
― jaxon and his computer banned (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:36 (sixteen years ago)
if everyone was White Lion
isn't that what Wavves said?
― nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:38 (sixteen years ago)
*snort*
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:39 (sixteen years ago)
okay I have no idea who death cab are but the name does kinda make them sound awesome tbh
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:14 (sixteen years ago)
Unfortunately the rest of their name is "for Cutie".
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:16 (sixteen years ago)
death cab for cutie are official actual winners of the all-time greatest qualitative disparity between cultural organisation named and cultural organisation from whom the name is borrowed (namely Vivian Stanshall)
― cockles (country matters), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)
o
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)
I absolutely agree with the lack of rock in the 00s compared to 80s and 90s. Of course lots of bands did rock in the 00s, but in a far more derivative manner, especially in the decade's second half.. just my opinion.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:23 (sixteen years ago)
well duh, there were more years of previously-rocking bands before them.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
Reading the discussion of the idea of "this album captures the spirt of the decade" on this thread was kinda depressing, everyone seemed to drift off point after the OTM Color Me Badd parody.
― Tim F, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)
can we talk about MAD MEN on AMC?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
why does testosterone matter
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
I think Elisabeth Moss is a great actress
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
No spoilers, I'm watching it tonight.
― jaymc, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
I think it's misogynistic and shitty.
― Turangalila, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
why does testosterone matter― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, August 17, 2009 6:31 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, August 17, 2009 6:31 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
This is exactly what I was thinking.
I think a certain type of music fan derives pleasure from telling other people that their music tastes are shit. Usually, this is a person who wants to feel better about themselves by putting other people down. I have known people like this. As people have said an innumerable amount of times, just listen to the shit you like. I would add: and ignore the fuck out of people who tell you you're wrong in your enjoyment.
― I am the anti-nabisco (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
music this decade was lacking in oestrogen
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)
That Taylor Swift record lacks testosterone.
― ILM's resident Wilco fanboy (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
What I'm saying is that IT SUCKS.
It doesn't matter if you don't prefer rock music.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
I'm only on Season 2 of Mad Men
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
Since this is a pitchfork thread I was going to use the pitchfork 500 as an example, but they actually did a good job of balancing all genres throughout each chapter.. The last 2 chapters include Boris, Mastadon, Les Savy Fav, Exploding Hearts, Art Brut, Trail Of Dead, Queens, Shellac, Mclusky, Lightning Bolt, and probably a few others that I don't recognize as more ballsy rock.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
I don't see bands like Television or, fuck, My Bloody Valentine as particularly testosterone-fueled bands.
Saying a certain rock record is shit because it lacks testosterone is asinine.
― ILM's resident Wilco fanboy (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
I certainly wasn't suggesting that.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
i mean whiney is right, big indie has been less 'manly' but that's not why it's better/worse
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:43 (sixteen years ago)
don't you think that zach braff music is a pretty strawman representation of the 00s?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)
why does natalie portman not want to rock?
And why do we care?
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)
To my ears, Television and MBV are huge sounding.. so I disagree with that. PJ Harvey records have muscle too, and she's very much all girl.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)
how is indie formed?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, August 17, 2009 6:44 PM (51 seconds ago) Bookmark
since decemberists, animal collective, andrew bird, shins etc have been in the billboard top 10 in this decade i'd say no
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
What's the connection between masculinity and something being "huge sounding"? Last year's Portishead record sounds HUGE, but it's not particularly testosterone-fueled.
― ILM's resident Wilco fanboy (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
but so have arcade fire and spoon and the hold steady for instance are a hugely popular indie band and maybe they aren't as manly as jesus lizard (hold steady excepted probably) but all bands are arguably just as good
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
natalie portman is a macho rapper on SNL digital shorts
maybe lonely island best summed up this decade
yeah dogg MBV are total wussbait
television could be pretty macho though esp early on
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
xxxp I don't focus on the billboard top 10, but I imagine you could pick equally wussy acts from the 80s/90s to make the same point.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
I dunno.. I suck at articulating myself today. you win because i'm now exhausted.
― billstevejim, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)
that's pretty drop in the ocean tho JS
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)
Those wussy bands would be better than the fuckin' Decemberists though. . .
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)
And what about something like Sonic Youth's Sonic Nurse, the best record they put out this decade? It's not manly at all, but it's still a great record.
― ILM's resident Wilco fanboy (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)
Guys, this is some stupid shit.
― ILM's resident Wilco fanboy (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
a lot of wussy bands are better than the decemberists
like tiger trap
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
kinda feel like Lamp was John the Baptist on this one upthread
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)
I'd take Tiger Trap in fight over the Decemberists.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)
i mean if you're talking about the most popular indie acts of the decade (this is what whiney was talking about?) it would make sense to consider which sold the most records?
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)
Yes well then it would make sense not bring up Jesus Lizard too.
It would have to be Postal Services or Oh, Inverted World or something, right?
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)
*Postal Service, yikes.
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)
okay we weren't on the same page then because I literally meant what i said, which was in reply to the "why do the 00s never want to rock" recent direction of this thread
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:52 (sixteen years ago)
Yes well then it would make sense not bring up Jesus Lizard too.― Alex in SF, Monday, August 17, 2009 7:50 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Alex in SF, Monday, August 17, 2009 7:50 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I doublebacked and said, yes please feel free to use REM and XTC for this argument, but please keep hammering away at this point
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:56 (sixteen years ago)
I fail to see the difference between REM and XTC (or Robin Hitchcock or 10,000 Maniacs) and the Decemberists and the Shins (except that the former are much better) in terms of general testosteroniness.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:58 (sixteen years ago)
i think REM def rocks more than the shins
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:01 (sixteen years ago)
They are generally the same in that respect.. correct. (except that Robyn Hitchcock wrote "I Wanna Destroy You.")
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:01 (sixteen years ago)
"i think REM def rocks more than the shins"
I think "more" is pushing it.
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:02 (sixteen years ago)
I mean, also, BIG INDIE doesn't even HAVE dudes like Jane's Addiction, The Cult, Ministry, Faith No More, Killing Joke, Pop Will Eat Itself
unless you count Mars Volta or "the scion metal fest"
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:03 (sixteen years ago)
Murmur kinda rocks, but in a not-so testicular manner.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)
Screaming Blue Messiahs rock more than Rock Plaza Central
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)
How much does the expansion of the category of "metal" play into this?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:07 (sixteen years ago)
i mean, hipsters picking the nits out of their beard while listening to SunnO))) doesn't really mean "big indie"
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:08 (sixteen years ago)
you have a beard and listen to sunno)))
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:09 (sixteen years ago)
Why do hipsters exist?
I think they should listen to the new Wilco.
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:09 (sixteen years ago)
I guess what I'm asking, is the bands you list, if they were getting "big" today, would they even be considered/promoted as indie, as opposed to metal?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:10 (sixteen years ago)
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Monday, August 17, 2009 7:09 PM (8 seconds ago) Bookmark
^ This. (For the record, I bought the Sunn 0))) record and I have a beard too. FUCKKKKKKKK.)
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:10 (sixteen years ago)
faith no more and jane's addiction and the cult and ministry were all covered in the heavy metal media of the day.
pop will eat itself was from england and no one gave a fuck.
― zero money down on new and pwned vehicles (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:11 (sixteen years ago)
but they were also covered on 120 minutes and spin
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:12 (sixteen years ago)
being the point
so, this is a thread about a list by some indie music website's consensus favourite albums of the last ten years where you guys complain about the placement of missy elliott and moan about the fact that a genre of music invented by anorak wearing scottish pussies isn't testosterone fuelled enough because the only ppl left who still buy cds are middle aged and they buy andrew bird albums and zoooey deschanel is way into the smiths?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:12 (sixteen years ago)
this is a thread about humans, and love
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:13 (sixteen years ago)
i think we're all just passing the time.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)
i'm really confused because the chronology keeps jumping is all
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)
nice summary. can you go through and sum up all the active threads now? would help my productivity >9000 ways.
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)
I think the success of the Decemberists, Shins, et al. in the 00s was presaged by late '90s successes like Elliott Smith, Neutral Milk Hotel, and Belle and Sebastian.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:15 (sixteen years ago)
xp - hand jobs thread is about hand jobs.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:16 (sixteen years ago)
there's also a thread where ppl post pictures of what they look like for jaymc.xls
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:17 (sixteen years ago)
there are a couple of other threads with the names of TV shows in them that are about those TV shows.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:17 (sixteen years ago)
it's kinda lol summarizing a thread dismissively that you've been contributing to
― Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:17 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, but sometimes u need some perspective bro
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:18 (sixteen years ago)
okay, undismissively - hand jobs thread is about hand jobs and oral sex on ladies.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:19 (sixteen years ago)
"P2K" still makes me think of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDsa6-xluHk&autoplay=1
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:19 (sixteen years ago)
lol will smith still makes me think of the futility of life
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)
why do all of Whiney's youtubes automatically play?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:22 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.last.fm/group/ilXor/charts
jus sayin
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:23 (sixteen years ago)
i like the decemberists they had songs abt pirates b4 it was cool and songs about architects which has never been cool
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:24 (sixteen years ago)
someone goes in and changes the embed code to read autoplay=yes, i'd assume. evil. evil autoplay.
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:25 (sixteen years ago)
it's having a some serious Skinnerian effects on me.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:26 (sixteen years ago)
im tryna meaningfully engage w/ this thread and the ideas in it btw - thinking its impt to be "thoughtful" and "concerted" in our efforts here but i have no idea wtf any1 means abt anything i feel like yall dont even occupy the same "timespace" that i do
what does mstrkrft and tim hecker sound like to u
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:27 (sixteen years ago)
carles?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:28 (sixteen years ago)
fyi the other day i was at the beach and these kids who had set up near us started singing hilary duff's "wake up" slightly out of tune and i was charmed and overwhelmed - played touch football w/ sum of them afterwards and talked abt green day
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:29 (sixteen years ago)
I was walkin down the beach and saw a lil kids day camp playin a Daft Punk's "One More Time"
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:31 (sixteen years ago)
oh and still l8r some1 had brought a "boombox" and was blasting zep - pretty rad imo - this had something to do w/"baLLS" btw
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:31 (sixteen years ago)
beachballs
sounds kinda kewl but don't know, I kinda think maybe I h8 Hilary her duff, but maybe she should be an "ironic" part of my "personal brand"
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:32 (sixteen years ago)
do you guys think "freakfolk" bands like CocoRoco will be shunned on p4k list because its "meme capacity" is all time low?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:33 (sixteen years ago)
iirc pitchfork always h8ed cocorosie
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:34 (sixteen years ago)
what happened 2 the band "new weird amrca"? did they break up?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:34 (sixteen years ago)
i know because my ex was really into them and used pitchfork hating them as a way of justifying their alrightness
im pretty indifferent to h.duff too was surprised i could recognize the song just from sum chicks singing it so casually esp because i think i read in nyt mag that shared cultural xp was dead except with movies for toddlers and retards
new weird america bought peacoats and dated actresses/voices of a generation iirc
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:35 (sixteen years ago)
Whine, dude, that is not even correct spelling.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:35 (sixteen years ago)
saw a dude in a comets on fire tee that wasnt me this week tho so idk
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:36 (sixteen years ago)
who wld u guise cast if u could "recast" the wire?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:36 (sixteen years ago)
the wire has already been recast as a yuppie cultural touchstone ~~~ it "sold out" by mailing scrners to nyer writers and ppl i went to college with now i cant even talk about it on the internet
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:38 (sixteen years ago)
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, August 17, 2009 8:31 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^ when i worked @ a camp this played all the time on radio disney which was broadcast on the loudspeakers
― max, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:40 (sixteen years ago)
I don't see what this has to do with katy perry
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:40 (sixteen years ago)
do u think in the post-Wire memeverse, Mad Men "stans" are like Phishheads trying to find "importance" in their life after "Jer-Bear" died?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:41 (sixteen years ago)
hey guys. i've only briefly scanned this thread, but i can tell that you all really love P4k as much as I do.
for the britishers out there, I've made a spotify playlist that features the songs of P4k's decade-defining list so far. 90 songs weren't available, so it isn't comprehensive, but it still reminds us of a great decade for music and a great decade for music writing.
P4k Reflects
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:42 (sixteen years ago)
Is Mad Men even like the Wire in any way apart from being a TV show?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:44 (sixteen years ago)
whiney do u want to borrow my moral orel dvds? fyi the creator of that show - a notorious drunk - really likes the mtn goats and uses their songs to end a couple of emotional devestating episodes
mad men "stans" create their own reality iirc or they get leveled on the internet
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:45 (sixteen years ago)
Why does a lame Will Smith song always begin when I open this thread now?
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:45 (sixteen years ago)
I already asked that question, but it definitely bears repeating.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:46 (sixteen years ago)
It's the one show where people convince themselves it's the "important" TV show they "have to watch" to "stay relevent." Sporanos invented the model
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:46 (sixteen years ago)
also "white ppl" love it
ppl just want to understand bro u dont have to despise them for it and ppl need to dream u dont have to h8 them for it
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)
I think the Wire has more balls & testosterone than Mad Men does.
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)
Gukbe, awesome, but you've got the live Twilight Sad track, not the album one
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)
another "question" that might be "relevant" is where some of the family guy music #s will place on this list
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:49 (sixteen years ago)
xp white ppl also like Mexican food
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:49 (sixteen years ago)
You have alerted me to the fact there's a live album though!
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:49 (sixteen years ago)
does mexifood have more testosterone than italafood?
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
plz try to stay on topic
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)
Willennium 4 life
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)
do cows have testosterone?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)
sorry country matters, I didn't realize. It seems to be the only version on spotify tho. i hope this doesn't hurt my cred.
xposts
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)
It's called Wilennium?!? Oy vey.
(xp)
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:52 (sixteen years ago)
I blame The Clash for letting Will Smith borrow their tune.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:53 (sixteen years ago)
It really is the defining track of the decade because it's called Will2K and foreshadowed M.I.A>
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:55 (sixteen years ago)
I wish M.I.A. ran onstage during a Will Smith concert and bludgeoned him with a folding chair.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:56 (sixteen years ago)
WE'RE GOING STRAIGHT TO THE WILD WILD WEST
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:57 (sixteen years ago)
xp - would kinda prefer the opposite tbh
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:57 (sixteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:57 (sixteen years ago)
Hey . . . it stopped happening. Timely mod intervention, perhaps?
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:58 (sixteen years ago)
uh, enough posts, so that it's hidden in the "skip # messages"
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:59 (sixteen years ago)
Here's the album version, Gukbe: http://open.spotify.com/track/0RJdrw2FwKUvPnkWSP6L7U
...you massive charlatan :D
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)
can we please get back to discussing testosterone and what white people like?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:03 (sixteen years ago)
sorry country matters, that is really embarrassing. it makes me wonder if i missed the 90 tracks that didn't turn up. xposts.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:04 (sixteen years ago)
Well, that's the very first song I checked for in your playlist. Imagine the oversights I've not gotten round to correcting yet!
― cockles (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:06 (sixteen years ago)
re: stuff white people like. I didn't put the Alicia Keys song on the spotify playlist because they didn't have the reggae remix, but I might have put on the normal mix of SMD's It's the Beat and not the 12" mix.
Am I racist?
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:07 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBxsRPTUJzs
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:10 (sixteen years ago)
i was reading in reverse and didn't understand why ppl were talking about the level of balls and testosterone the wire was in possession of
http://www.thewire.co.uk/images/artists/sylvian_david/cover307.jpg
white ppl do dig it tho. that is true
― thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:15 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoPqqLczciY
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_dFpKZo54w
- vs -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT6TK_sFY_A
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:23 (sixteen years ago)
zomg Taste The Fame! that just made my day
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:01 (sixteen years ago)
lol will smith still makes me think of the futility of life― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:21 (1 hour ago)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:21 (1 hour ago)
^ This.
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)
For some reason, our 8th grade gym teachers had EVERYONE in the class split up into groups and choreograph dances.
My group's was to "Miami," I believe.
omg u were in 8th grade when 'miami' came out.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:28 (sixteen years ago)
if you got jiggy with someone it was probably illegal
i 10 yrs old
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:29 (sixteen years ago)
yup... i think that's gonna be my final post here on ilx. peace yall, it was fun.
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:30 (sixteen years ago)
man see u
― You are Rebels! You are all yankees (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:31 (sixteen years ago)
i hope that is not true
― Bee OK, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:35 (sixteen years ago)
just roadkill on the kshighway
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:36 (sixteen years ago)
J0rdan, why are you quitting?
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)
There is zero roadkill on the kshighway. The kshighway is wonderful and lined with Wilco, Loose Fur, Autumn Defense, and Nels Cline records.
I knew this would be the thread where kshighway starts offing ppl
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:49 (sixteen years ago)
Reading his posts is like watching The Ring
Is it really THAT painful, Whiney?
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:51 (sixteen years ago)
I'm thinking of setting up a Twitter account to review 1,000 of Whiney's posts.
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:52 (sixteen years ago)
I want to speak of the revolutionary work I am doing, 140 characters at a time, at Twitter conferences.
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:53 (sixteen years ago)
harsh. though whiney did seemingly diss the wire and mad men, so it might be fair.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:58 (sixteen years ago)
Hahaha, I actually admire Whiney's work! and have followed his Twitter account for a while now, shared his conference video with friends on Facebook, etc., but he likes to be a dick to me so I feel the need to be a dick back.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:00 (sixteen years ago)
My posts now come with a stunning, unrequested endorsement from Mr. Whiney himself.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:01 (sixteen years ago)
worst dickback ever xpost
― wilter, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:02 (sixteen years ago)
oh come on wilter
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:02 (sixteen years ago)
To get back on topic, P4k should be posting the next installment of their best tracks list in a few hours. Really looking forward to that, although tbh I'm moreso looking forward to Friday's 20-1 list and next week's essays.
man, even kshighway being mean is nice
― P2K ft. ksdiddy- "Bump, Bump. Bump" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:02 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway, if you're real, you're too nice to deserve my abuse :(
― P2K ft. ksdiddy- "Bump, Bump. Bump" (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:03 (sixteen years ago)
are you saying he is lacking in testosterone required for true meanness?
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:03 (sixteen years ago)
I'm the Shins of ILM.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks Whiney! :-D
if i ever meet you IRL, I'm buying you a drink. Hold me to that.
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)
Let me know the next time you're in Boston, then, and I'll take you up on that.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:06 (sixteen years ago)
u 2 really gayed up this thread huh
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)
shh...kshighway and whiney have the love that dare not speak its name
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:08 (sixteen years ago)
Anyone have any guess what P4k's single of the decade will be?
I'm trying to think about what will make it to the top 10. "Umbrella," probably, and "Paper Planes."
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:12 (sixteen years ago)
thread of the year, some major lol and you can feel the love.
kshighway is going to be one of ilm's best and we get him right after we lose arguably our best.
― Bee OK, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)
nabisco's leaving ilx???
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)
cankles is leaving ilx???
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:14 (sixteen years ago)
zombie is leaving ilx???
― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:15 (sixteen years ago)
RIP Bimble
― Bee OK, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:15 (sixteen years ago)
:( RIP really miss that dude.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:17 (sixteen years ago)
don't know what the top 10 will be, but will probably disagree with it. now it could be the wine talking, but i still love lists and want to give props to the pitchfork folk and kshighway.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 03:19 (sixteen years ago)
― Kid S. Highwaygarten (kshighway), Monday, August 17, 2009 10:46 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hey kshighway if you ever wanna come kick it on my Rolling Nels Cline Thread that would be cool, we can just chill and not call each other sockpuppets or anything
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
lonely guys just thinking baout cline
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:19 (sixteen years ago)
So is this a poll thread?
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:30 (sixteen years ago)
Jordan's quitting for real? Didn't he simply posted he hearted 10 yrs old and then he joked this was probably his last post implying he's getting detained for pedophilia?
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:30 (sixteen years ago)
Moka, I think that's the case.
― wilter, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:32 (sixteen years ago)
http://i28.tinypic.com/8vrvyf.jpg
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:34 (sixteen years ago)
Joka
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:34 (sixteen years ago)
Mokan's Law
― velko, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)
Well it's been 2 hours the joke was dead anyways.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:37 (sixteen years ago)
I can't believe J0rdan is gone. He had such a discernable posting style and personality.
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:52 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, Al! I've added the Nels Cline thread to my bookmark toolbar in Firefox and will be posting there very soon.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)
I hope J0rdan was just kidding. I think he'll be back. :-)
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:58 (sixteen years ago)
Its a forum... who "retires" from a forum? Who cares? Why don't people talk more about music?
― Evan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)
Well coming back to the music... Pitchfork has just published part 200-101 and this time it does have reviews of each track.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:33 (sixteen years ago)
Fucking lala player with its stubborn registration announcement and US only elitist bullshit.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:37 (sixteen years ago)
Hmmm what a coincidence there's still saliva in my carpet from the first time I heard 'Leaf House' too, if you know what I mean.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:42 (sixteen years ago)
how is 'touch the sky' head of 'ante up' 'in da club' 'southern hospitality' 'sippin on syrup' -- its like a 5th tier kanye single & it ruined the curtis track for me for a good couple years
― butthurt (deej), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:46 (sixteen years ago)
With Southern crunk still then a dominant force on hip-hop radio, it's hard to remember a time when a combination of the genre's trunk-rattling grit with sleek modern R&B would be considered groundbreaking. But so it was when Usher unveiled "Yeah" in early 2004. "Yeah" was the dirtiest-sounding thing Usher had done to date, but the real draw was Lil Jon's ferocious-but-slippery production, featuring that crazy keyboard vamp that still sounds thrilling today. It also contains fantastic moments of unintentional hilarity, with lyrics dovetailing with Dave Chappelle's loving TV mimicry of Lil Jon and the best guest-spot mispronunciation (Ludacris' "Ursher") since cats were calling Kanye "Cain" on his own records. --Joe Colly
what in god's name is this
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:47 (sixteen years ago)
i really remember back in 04 when i was like "this 'yeah' song wouldn't be as good if it didn't perfectly dovetail with dave chappelle's mimicry of the song's producer! also 'ursher'! lmao" jeezus
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:49 (sixteen years ago)
i remember when i gained a newfound appreciation for the KKK when a slight rise in their popularity dovetailed with dave chappelle's loving mimicry of their rallies
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:52 (sixteen years ago)
I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want someone to show me.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:00 (sixteen years ago)
I like The Hold Steady a lot, but I'm surprised to see The Swish as high as No. 108 on Pitchfork's list.
(BTW, I really don't know what Crunk is. I sort of know it when I hear it.)
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:15 (sixteen years ago)
Crunk is an euphemism which was born with the Dirty South rappers and stands for being crazy and fucked up on alcohol and marihuana. Unfortunately I'm afraid I can't show you what it means.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:25 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks. What I get from Wiki isn't very helpful:
Crunk is a style of music that originated from southern hip hop and electronic dance music in the early 1990s. . . . Looped, stripped-down drum machine rhythms are usually used. . . . The drum machines are usually accompanied by simple, repeated synthesizer melodies and heavy bass stabs. The tempo of the music is somewhat slower than hip-hop, around the speed of reggaeton.The focal point of crunk is more often the beats and music than the lyrics therein. Crunk rappers, however, often shout and scream their lyrics, creating an aggressive, almost heavy, style of hip-hop. While other subgenres of hip-hop address sociopolitical or personal concerns, crunk is almost exclusively party music, favoring call and response hip-hop slogans in lieu of more substantive approaches.The first known use of the word "crunk" was in 1972 by Dr. Seuss in his book Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now!
The focal point of crunk is more often the beats and music than the lyrics therein. Crunk rappers, however, often shout and scream their lyrics, creating an aggressive, almost heavy, style of hip-hop. While other subgenres of hip-hop address sociopolitical or personal concerns, crunk is almost exclusively party music, favoring call and response hip-hop slogans in lieu of more substantive approaches.
The first known use of the word "crunk" was in 1972 by Dr. Seuss in his book Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now!
I didn't know Crunk began in the 90s. I thought it was basically a 00s development.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:40 (sixteen years ago)
You know I have a link that might be useful for understanding where the genre comes from: http://techno.org/electronic-music-guide/Under the breakbeat section you'll find Crunk with some sound examples and a small description.
― Moka, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:44 (sixteen years ago)
I'm loving that site! Plus, many lols. Ex. A: Their description of "Speed Garage, AKA, The Worst Music In The World"
How did this music get past the censors? Who greenlighted this project at the Official Electronic Music Genre Standards and Classifications Consortium? I'm still at a loss as to what it's trying to do. Is it funky? No. Those dulled basslines sound like someone farting into a pillow. Or like the school teacher in the Charlie Brown cartoons scolding some child for his inability to spit, sing and gargle at the same time. Is it soulful? No. Time-stretched vocals never had any appeal, ever. There's no real hook, no real melody. It doesn't even pay any decent homage to Classic Garage. So what the hell is this stuff doing?! Sucking, by the sounds of it. But as bad as it sounds, it has actually managed to find a way to get WORSE over the years, dumping the time-stretched vocals in favour of......you guessed it: those annoying, crooning Mariah Carey wannabe diva hooks. Oh, fucking hell.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 06:55 (sixteen years ago)
the "More Human Than Human" loop under "Industrial Rock" is how I'm going to annoy the world from now on
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 07:02 (sixteen years ago)
i'm not really sure how 'dovetail' is being used in that sentence but the first Chappelle's Show skit about Lil Jon aired a few months after "Yeah!" hit
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:07 (sixteen years ago)
i think as a verb
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:07 (sixteen years ago)
but i mean..."with lyrics dovetailing with Dave Chappelle's loving TV mimicry of Lil Jon" -- does that just mean 'haha he's saying Yeah! and Okay! just like he did on Chappelle's Show'? whatever the meaning, it's poorly phrased.
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
i think he's saying they appeared around the same time...
I think you're wrong, btw about "Yeah" happening after. I remember Jon REALLY embracing the "OK... Yeah" thing AFTER the sketch, and i think "Yeah" might have been a result of that
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:15 (sixteen years ago)
"Yeah" debuted February 3, 2004A Day In The Life Of Lil Jon appeared February 25, 2004"Yeah topped Billboard February 28, 2004
I think that ducktales pretty nicely
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:17 (sixteen years ago)
MONTHS AFTER
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:18 (sixteen years ago)
no, i'm right. the first "A Moment In The Life" sketch aired on 2/25/04 -- "Yeah!" hit #1 the same week but had been out and popular since late '03
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:19 (sixteen years ago)
anyway you just said "'Yeah!' might have been a result of" the sketch, so stfu and eat crow for once
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:20 (sixteen years ago)
are you deejing me where you're claiming because some leak blog put an unmastered version of single on their site or something it was mad popular for months?
The video didn't appear on MTV until Feburary 18
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
step down, little man
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)
...
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:24 (sixteen years ago)
you're talking about pretty much the biggest chart hit of the decade, dude, not a song on a "leak blog" (did those even exist in 2003?)
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
it didn't just leap to #1 the moment it was released. this was a year or so before iTunes had any effect on the Hot 100.
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
The single debuted on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 at number fifty-three on January 13, 2004
a whole month!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
I was there... When Usher recorded "Yeah"... with Faust in 1972
dude, you just said 15 minutes ago that you thought the song may have been a reaction to the Chappelle sketch -- so far i have yet to say anything nearly as inaccurate
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:31 (sixteen years ago)
I said "might have been" because I wasn't sure. You're definitvely stating "Yeah" was the first rock n roll song since it came out before "Rocket 88"
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:32 (sixteen years ago)
btw ty 4 "step down, little man"
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:33 (sixteen years ago)
:)
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:34 (sixteen years ago)
ts: "stfu and eat some crow for once" vs. "step down, little man"
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
stfu and eat some crow 2: city of angels
― RT @ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
i think we've settled that the lyrics did "dovetail" (definition: fit together tightly) with the chappelle skit (seeing as how the song hit #1 the week the sketch came out) but that al didn't "say anything nearly as inaccurate" as whiney's belief the song was a result of the skit so everyone's a winner. now we can go back to
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:47 (sixteen years ago)
did you guys finish talking about Radiohead while I was off drinking last night
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)
i'm glad anthony declared we could move on 10 minutes after people stopped posting about it
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:51 (sixteen years ago)
like i said before, the Radiohead talk was just a jump start, we'll come back to them when they occupy the top 5 of both lists
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
stfu and eat some crow for once
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
I did the exact same thing and now look at this thread: it's full of crows and shit.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:56 (sixteen years ago)
200 - 111 are really good .. the first 9 pages. - I didn't know "Get By" had a remix.. I've heard the original version 100 times but never once heard this Mos Def Jay-Z thing. - A lot of these album track choices do seem kinda random from time to time, but the Fugazi choice is tremendous. I don't have my hopes up for it, but seeing another Argument track in the top 100 would be gratifying.- "The Middle" is fine I guess.. "Bleed American" is such a great song tho.. always overlooked.- Party hard.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)
hey monday night drinkers: what do u think of testosterone in music?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
balls
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
I heard they mix musical testosterone in jaeger.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
i knew "Get By" had a remix, but it isn't very good, and its inclusion instead of the original is the same crap we were complaining about upthread. but yeah "The Middle" is by far my least favorite of the 4 singles off that JEW album.
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
would "sweetness" have charted higher on a stylus list? we will never know.
i kinda love the mix of big pop hits and indie stuff i'd never imagine actually making someone's canon. Like "In Da Club" being one spot behind a Cat Power album opener i couldn't even remember. it's educational!
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)
Currently my favorite thing about Amnesiac is asking people about the album by over enunciating its title 3 or 4 times in a row like Tom Green would do. "You know that album Amnesiac? AmNEsiac? AmNEESHiac?"
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:03 (sixteen years ago)
Does the remix say "we go through episodes too, like attack of the clones?" or give shout outs to the Beatles? I don't feel like listening to find out.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:09 (sixteen years ago)
i wonder if there's gonna be any green day or blink in the top 100, can't imagine they'll go any further on the butt-rock scale than that
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:13 (sixteen years ago)
even though a top 500 singles of the 00s with no linkin park is a shonde
― da croupier, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)
it's awesome! sometimes
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)
i just wish i had time to READ and digest all this end-of-decade coverage
― I'M IN MIAMI, TRICK-OR-TREAT (Beatrix Kiddo), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
you'll have the next decade to catch up
― some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)
did you guys finish talking about Radiohead while I was off drinking last nightI did the exact same thing and now look at this thread: it's full of crows and shit.
me too but i didn't go out. we are a couple of hours ahead of you americans here in europe. the thread was really active last night european time, i thought everybody on it was drunk. i still stand by my words on amnesiac though. anyone interested to continue the discussion? the vague, ominous lyrics of most songs of amnesiac to me describe quite well the insecurity of today's world on a meta level. there is not one interpretation, there are many. we are on shaky ground. nothing is sure after 911 and the financial crisis anymore. not even the states, not even capitalism. we had forgotten about the fragility of the most powerful country and the most powerful economic concept. we were ill. we were amnesiacs. probably most of us still are, actually. maybe this is not the right thread for this discussion. shall we start a new one?
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)
Every time I link away from this thread & click back, Will2K automatically starts up.
― Pillbox, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)
Can we talk about the real issue with the P4000 list? Every time I try to look at it, it freezes my computer and Safari needs to be manually shut down. Does anyone have a text list version?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:35 (sixteen years ago)
Yes, a text version of this list please.
― jetfan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
500. The Big Pink"Velvet"[4AD; 2009]
― Can someone summarise what's going on with the GOON? (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
499. N.E.R.D."Run to the Sun" [Electronic version][Virgin; 2002]
498. Unwound"Scarlette"[Kill Rock Stars; 2001]
497. Woods"Rain On"[Shrimper/Woodsist; 2009]
496. Akufen"Deck the House (Herbert's Stop Like This Mix)"[Force Inc.; 2002]
― Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
get more RAM
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
495. Weezer"Island in the Sun"[Universal/Geffen; 2001]
― Can someone summarise what's going on with the GOON? (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:40 (sixteen years ago)
494. Blonde Redhead"Equus"[4AD; 2004]
493. Goldfrapp"Lovely Head"[Mute; 2000]
492. St. Vincent"The Strangers"[4AD; 2009]
Is that Big Pink band a vaginal reference or a The Band reference?
Re: RAM, if a Macbook user can't handle Pitchfork, then who exactly are they writing for?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
491. Nickelback"Rockstar"[Roadrunner; 2008]
― You are Rebels! You are all yankees (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
whiney don't u have some twitter reviews to write?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:41 (sixteen years ago)
Is Nickelback really 491? Does that mean How You Remind Me is gonna chart in the top 100?
490. Closer Musik"Departures"[Kompakt; 2002]
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
489. Kano"Reload It"[679; 2005]
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:43 (sixteen years ago)
488. Jesu"Silver"[Hydra Head; 2006]
487. 65daysofstatic"Music Is Music As Devices Are Kissing Is Everything"[Monotreme; 2007]
― You are Rebels! You are all yankees (country matters), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
51-100 is now up...
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:20 (sixteen years ago)
This list is so lol. It's like pfk is trying to mediate between the brand they've developed and the acknowledgment that the best singles of the decade have all been in hip-hop and R&B. Jay-Z, Lil Wayne, Three 6 Mafia, Hot Chip, Aaliyah, The Knife... and then Animal Collective. The Killers, Kanye West, Junior Boys, and then Arcade Fire. Dr Dre followed immediately by Band of Horses. At least for me, the effect - especially as we move down the list - is that the list undermines all the indie music that pfm has stumped for over the last decade. It seems so silly. Is Band of Horses' "The Funeral" a better single than "Izzo," "A Milli" or even "Mr. Brightside?" I mean, it seems self-evident to me that it is not. Maybe an argument could be made for some of these indie bands placing albums at the top of the album list, but it's just bizarre seeing them next to actual singles.
Anyway, no new criticism, but at least IMHO, the discrepancy between these two things (the indie brand and actual pop singles) has never been as evident as this list, and I can only imagine it'll become moreso as it gets into the top 50. "White Winter Hymnal" versus "Cry Me a River..." It's kinda even weirder because I don't know what constitutes "White Winter Hymnal" as a single, and I know it certainly didn't have any kind of impact on music by contrast.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:49 (sixteen years ago)
mordy is right but i like this recent installment way better than the previous ones, some good stuff like "gone" & "takeover" - "flashing lights" has always been overrated by the pfork set imo. it's the best song off his worse album but he has about 20 better ones.
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:52 (sixteen years ago)
this list is really weird to me because I've been writing about music--all kinds!--essentially this entire decade. And I couldn't hum 75% of the non-rap/R&B songs if you held a gun to my head. I totally feel like the Pfork staff has had a completely different decade than me! Maybe they have!
Don't get me wrong, it's not a criticism. But it's definitely speaking volumes about what happens when a generation/music industry gets attuned to thinking in terms of "tracks" instead of "singles."
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:16 (sixteen years ago)
i mean, The Germs released singles, so we all know what "Lexicon Devil" sounds like.
Wolf Parade "leaks a track" off an album, so I have no fucking clue what "I'll Believe in Anything" is.
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)
I sent my mother (who grew up and did most of her foundational music listening during the 60s) the PFM 1960s best singles list. She recognized about 95% of the songs in the list (tho she admitted she had to listen to a number of them to remember them, she didn't always recognize them from the title alone). By contrast, I think I only recognize around 70%, or even less, of the music from this current list. Some of that obviously has to do with distance -- those 1960s tracks have had decades to circulate and who knows whether she could've replicate that in 1969. Also, as a billion words have been spilled, music isn't as hegemonic now, and there is so much stuff you can miss if you're not paying attention. But, those things said, I write about music, listen to tons and tons of music, and have been reading PFM for years (along with, on-and-off, Spin, Rollingstone, Blender, The Wire, Paste Magazine, these last couple years Idolator, etc). I wonder if some of the obscurity isn't a tad bit intentional. (Which isn't to say I have any problem with it -- I'm thrilled to learn about music I missed, and I'd feel disappointed if I recognized every track off the list) but it also strikes me as slightly disingenuous.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:38 (sixteen years ago)
You might be reading into this a bit too much.. I'm pretty sure one person didn't decide upon the results..
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:45 (sixteen years ago)
What they have in common is that pitchfork loves these songs, and they have all been released since Jan 1st 2000.. I don't see any other huge connections.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:46 (sixteen years ago)
"Paranoid" is better than "Flashing Lights."
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:47 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think it's some big conspiracy, and I think it could speak to a number of contributers who simultaneously appreciate big hooks and huge pop hits, and grew up with a website that built a reputation on obscure indie music. I don't think there's anything wrong with it, but I don't think I'm "reading into" it to say that there's clearly two impulses at work in the list.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:50 (sixteen years ago)
Ie: I don't buy that a person who voted for Wolf Parade's "I'll Believe in Anything" and Basement Jaxx's "Where's Your Head At?" voted for them for the same reason (because they enjoy both). Presumably there was some thought put into the selection. (Of course, it could be that half the contributers voted for the big pop hits, and the other half voted for the obscure indie "tracks," but that would speak to the contradiction in a different way.)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:52 (sixteen years ago)
I doubt it's a democracy, dude.
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:54 (sixteen years ago)
Either way.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:56 (sixteen years ago)
Well someone had to break the 7-way ties eventually.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:02 (sixteen years ago)
If lady gaga turns out on the top 50 I swear a little part of me will die forever.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:05 (sixteen years ago)
This list is so lol. It's like pfk is trying to mediate between the brand they've developed and the acknowledgment that the best singles of the decade have all been in hip-hop and R&B.
Talking about 'p4k' as this sentient, decision-making being is pretty lol. It would be a lot more interesting if these sorta lists were made in a sweaty and violent 20 hour conference meeting where everyone had to agree on the final product, ya know? As if it were some congressional bill or something. Until then, there's no 'meaning' to the fact that Dr. Dre is followed by A Band of Horses - lots of people liked both songs, and a few people liked A Band of Horses a little more.
― iatee, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:09 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think you understand what I'm saying. I'm not suggesting they intentionally put Dr. Dre next to A Band of Horses. I'm suggesting that - assuming they had some kind of vote - that there were a couple different ideas of what a single was, and that one idea is pretty strong (that a single is a memorable hit) and is undermining the other idea (that it's just a track I dig off an album).
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:10 (sixteen years ago)
Mordy: It's easy to think of a site like PF as being this single-voiced monolith (especially when many of the writers bring a similar tone, esp. in blurbs), when in reality it's just a swath of individual specialists coming together and reporting from their neck of the woods. Like you, I'm sure a good portion of their writing staff is oblivious to artists and songs that are gushed about in neighboring PF circles, and their WTF Flags were flying high as well when they read that list.
I actually think pitchfork has been so successful, in part, because they're able to get such a diverse cast to bring a similar style and aesthetic to the site. The site's tone is very consistent.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:11 (sixteen years ago)
That's in regard to your post about the list being obscure in places.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:13 (sixteen years ago)
I imagine the ilm list will look pretty similar in this sense!
― iatee, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:13 (sixteen years ago)
Probably! It'll be equally bizarre. "Work It" is not a single in the same way that Wolf Parade is a single.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:14 (sixteen years ago)
well, the poll says 'the top 500 tracks' - not 'the top 500 singles' (not that this should matter imo)
― iatee, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:17 (sixteen years ago)
coming up on Pitchfork's top 50:
M.I.A. - Paper PlanesOutkast - Hey Ya!YYYs - MapsGnarls Barkley - CrazyBattles - AtlasDaft Punk - Digital LoveThe Knife - HeartbeatsBeyonce - Crazy in LoveFranz Ferdinand - Take me outMgmt - KidsCrystal Castles - CrimewavePanda Bear - BrosGrouper - Heavy Water/I'd Rather Be SleepingAnimal Collective - My girlsSufjan Stevens - Come on feel the ilinoise!
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:17 (sixteen years ago)
somehow I doubt outkast will make the top 10.. certainly not "hey ya"
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:17 (sixteen years ago)
either that or B.O.B. but I could bet you they'll make it to the top 10.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:18 (sixteen years ago)
B.O.B. if anything
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:19 (sixteen years ago)
I'm kinda curious how they determined this list, since a lot of tracks seem like stand-in votes for the entire album. Like I don't remember "Hounds of Love" being a particularly break-through track on that Futureheads album, and it's a good song, but it's good in a way that a lot of the other songs are good. I'm curious why they decided to include one Futureheads song and picked that one, or whether a few people actually felt that was the definitive Futureheads single. (It seems like this in a couple places -- the Fleet Foxes song is another good example.) And if this is the case, and the track is standing in for the album instead of itself as an independent work, then I think it's fair to ask whether these tracks belong with these other singles.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:19 (sixteen years ago)
either way this is bound to be the least interesting feature of the whole set.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:19 (sixteen years ago)
I'm curious whether they decided to....
I could just be projecting, btw. I've been guilty of this in the past... trying to find a track to pick for my singles list off an album. I think I've even wiki'd an album I loved to find the track that was a single just so I could vote for it on the singles vote. I'm just not sure, even having done it myself, that it's the best approach.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:20 (sixteen years ago)
"To Hell With Good Intentions" made the top 100.. I'm already happy.
I don't need to read another paragraph about how "Ignition (Remix)" changed everything.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:21 (sixteen years ago)
Also coming up on Pitchfork's top 50:
Lcd soundsystem - someone greatBurial - ArchangelHercules & love affair - BlindThe field - a paw in my faceRatatat - WildcatSnoop dog - sensual seduction
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:25 (sixteen years ago)
"Hounds of Love" and "White Winter Hymnal" were the only songs I played from those albums after the hype died down. Hell, WWH is the only song I remember really liking from the Fleet Foxes album; I thought the album was a total lemon at first, instead of one with worth just one good squeeze. I also would list HoL as one of my favorite songs from this decade.
But can someone take a brief moment to explain to me why Outkast decided to stop making music often?
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:25 (sixteen years ago)
Then I stand corrected!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:27 (sixteen years ago)
... although have sensual seduction or perhaps drop it's like its hot, wildcat or crimewave made it already on the list? I wouldn't have thought they would rank this high but I don't see why they would leave them out.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:28 (sixteen years ago)
Moka, if you keep playing Pitchfork Fan Fiction I'm gonna give you a "top 51"
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:29 (sixteen years ago)
They're successful because they have an editorial staff that can pare down the diverse cast's opinions into a cohesive narrative. If more places would do this, they'd still be around.
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:30 (sixteen years ago)
what's a top 51? Either way, not playing fan fiction, just want to know how many of my dull and obvious predictions turn out right.
I'm really bummed they completely forgot about Lali Puna and Stereolab.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:31 (sixteen years ago)
oh no not lali puna
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:33 (sixteen years ago)
Looking forward to Franz Ferdinand's "Take Me Out" being stretch into the "the song that epitomized the decade." I doubt it'll finish top ten, though.
It's been really weird reading this list and having 2000-2004 be so divorced from the present. I feel like adding to:
Bands/Pop stars that are quickly becoming relics of the earlier part of this decade?
I think you're probably OTM about this.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:35 (sixteen years ago)
well Lali Puna are pitchfork-friendly and faking the books, bi-pet or nin-com-pop are all great songs. I thought they would go for their cover of 'together in electric dreams'.
Also... Invisible conga people's "cable dazed" is just too damn good to be ommited and I think it placed quite high on their 2008 list... too lazy to check right now tho.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:37 (sixteen years ago)
Has sebastien tellier already made an appearance?
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:39 (sixteen years ago)
Did "Hot in Herre" place? (There are still a bunch of pages I can't read cause they freeze my browser.)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:39 (sixteen years ago)
Snoop dog - sensual seduction
lol yeah right, I heard this on the radio for no more than a week
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:41 (sixteen years ago)
"snoop dog"
"It Wasn't Me"?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:43 (sixteen years ago)
Don't think "Hot in Herre" has placed. The remaining fifty will be filled with all of the usual suspects but I'm looking forward to songs we ALL haven't heard before a thousand times before. No doubt a few will show amongst the LCD Soundsystems, Crazy in Loves and Kid A tracks.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:44 (sixteen years ago)
I dont think the amount of time you heard it on the radio will influence the decision of it's placement as the whole list has proven to be pretty random But 'drop it like its hot' is a much better candidate, it's true.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:44 (sixteen years ago)
i think the snoop dogg one was a "joke"
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:45 (sixteen years ago)
Wow I completely forgot about "it wasn't me" appearing on this decade... I think I was 14 when it came out.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:46 (sixteen years ago)
NO it's not a joke! Snoop dogg is important.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:47 (sixteen years ago)
will "What You Know" be on here
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:52 (sixteen years ago)
Is "10AM Automatic" a dark horse for the top 50?
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:54 (sixteen years ago)
there's no reason for "Island in the Sun" to place over "Hashpipe" as the Weezer song.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:55 (sixteen years ago)
"Since U been gone" will show up on there. So will 'How you remind me'. 'St Anger' will be the unexpected song.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:56 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=71&threadid=70508
^^def time for a revive imo
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:56 (sixteen years ago)
Has Ween been shafted? I think they have. An embarrassment of riches.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:58 (sixteen years ago)
You're getting old Jordan. You're not fun anymore.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:58 (sixteen years ago)
Vanessa Carlton's "Thousand Miles" will top "All My Friends" in a stunner.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:59 (sixteen years ago)
And if anything you should be suggest banned for even thinking snoop dogg is not important.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:01 (sixteen years ago)
Moka, you don't really believe This Is How You Remind Me and Saint Anger are both going to place, do you?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:13 (sixteen years ago)
lol surprise #1: "Down with the Sickness"
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:15 (sixteen years ago)
HoJL gonna swoop into the top 20 or so I'm thinking.
― pastor prayer zoo (Clay), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:15 (sixteen years ago)
No, Mordy I jokes. I dont. I hope 'since u been gone' doesn't either. I've never understood why that song gets a free pass from hipster zines and blogs.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:31 (sixteen years ago)
me either & i think we should talk about it
― geir ham, go (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:33 (sixteen years ago)
― Mordy, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:19 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i was thinking this too. def the case for ghost 'tracks' like "Shakey Dog" & "Nutmeg". & picking nutmeg of cherchez laghost, which was a bigger club single, is even more random (im assuming cherchez probably wont place). It kind of annoys me bcuz there are SOOOO many rap songs from iffy albums that deserve/earned attention that will be ignored in favor of tracks from LPs that will be def represented on the albums list.
imo g-unit 'wanna get to know you' is better than half the rap singles on this list.
im also SUPERsurprised at how low "Stay Fly" placed ... behind a kanye album track??? super random
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:40 (sixteen years ago)
picking nutmeg OVER cherchez la ghost, i mean
White Winter Hymnal was definitely a single, or at least it had a video. Hounds of Love as well, and that still gets played at UK 'indie' nights. I presume a lot of these were singles, or at least had videos. The bizarre thing is the tracks off Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, which as far as I know weren't singles at all.
Anyways, it's a list and therefore pretty arbitrary, but still good fun for the unemployed saddos out there like me.
Updated Spotify list (now 342/450)
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:41 (sixteen years ago)
I think 'since u been gone' gets a free pass because it epitomizes reality shows such as american idol which saw their rise and demise in the 00's and also it's a relevant piece of memorabilia from that short period where chick rock dominated the airwaves It works as a very important piece to define mediatic history in this decade.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:42 (sixteen years ago)
What do you think Jordan?
it gets a 'free pass' bcuz everyone loved it and its awesome
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:42 (sixteen years ago)
Yes you're right everyone loved it. Its an awesome awesome song. My eyes have been opened.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:48 (sixteen years ago)
I will go now and reflect upon this.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:49 (sixteen years ago)
I like Kelly Clarkson, idk. Also, I think American Idol is still pretty popular?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 08:51 (sixteen years ago)
Only thing that I'd like to see more on this list is some r&b. i may be wrong but i don't remember seeing any ne-yo, dream, rihanna (although umbrella will obv. make it) etc. etc. etc. just 1 destinys child song and one beyonce song. They never really covered it though, so I knew it would be unlikely to see any on the list other than the biggest singles.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:20 (sixteen years ago)
there are couple of Destiny's Child songs so far, and I expect at least one more. Also, Beyonce's Irreplaceable, and Crazy in Love must place at some point. I know Usher's Yeah! is on it, and I wouldn't be surprised to see another one. Ne-Yo's 'Closer' wouldn't be a shocker.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:46 (sixteen years ago)
I did an Aaliyah review Samuel did you not notice :-(
― Tim F, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:52 (sixteen years ago)
Oh yeah, sorry. She got two songs! But still 10/500 is a rubbish return, if the genre gets to 10.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:56 (sixteen years ago)
Hounds of Love as well, and that still gets played at UK 'indie' nights.
it made #8 on the pop charts there too
― da croupier, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, i complained about the tracks-representing-albums thing upthread. but still, it's pretty clear those songs sum up GK's appeal for the people that voted for him, his one token club hit does not.
yeah but that's a challop
super surprised? really? i dunno i'm just happy to see songs like "Stay Fly" on there at all
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:22 (sixteen years ago)
Like I don't remember "Hounds of Love" being a particularly break-through track on that Futureheads album, and it's a good song, but it's good in a way that a lot of the other songs are good. I'm curious why they decided to include one Futureheads song and picked that one, or whether a few people actually felt that was the definitive Futureheads single. (It seems like this in a couple places -- the Fleet Foxes song is another good example.)
I dunno, it definitely seemed to me that a lot of people who weren't particularly Futureheads fans got excited about the fact that they covered a Kate Bush song and did it really well. IIRC, it finished in the top 10 of both Pitchfork and Stylus in 2005.
As for "White Winter Hymnal," it was in fact the first single off the Fleet Foxes album, so it was probably a lot of people's introduction to that band. It was also on Time magazine's top 10 of 2008. The only other song of theirs that I could've seen placing would've been "Mykonos," since it was the standout track on the EP and the first song they played on SNL. But "White Winter Hymnal" isn't that much of a surprise, really.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
I wonder if that Quarashi single will place higher than "B.Y.O.B." I think the theme from the Requiem For A Dream soundtrack is a lock for top 5. And umm.. four words.. "You Know You're Right??" Hello???
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
"Jesus Etc." is its wizened brother, meditating on last cigarettes amidst stabs of pedal steel and eerily dovetailing with 9/11 ("Tall buildings shake", "skyscrapers are scrapin' together").
CONGRATS U WROTE LYRICS ABT 9/11
god this song is worse than i remember.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:08 (sixteen years ago)
I strongly support "Jesus, etc."
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:09 (sixteen years ago)
Much the best track on that album.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)
Super pumped to see clinic's "distortions" on there, one of my favorite songs ever
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
^^^^^ This. Obviously, there's lots of room to quibble and complain about omissions and ordering, but there's a lot of great songs on the Pitchfork list.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
"Jesus Etc." is its wizened brother, meditating on last cigarettes amidst stabs of pedal steel and eerily dovetailing with 9/11 ("Tall buildings shake", "skyscrapers are scrapin' together").CONGRATS U WROTE LYRICS ABT 9/11god this song is worse than i remember.― call all destroyer, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 9:08 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 9:08 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
Great song! And it was written BEFORE 9/11, so that comment makes no sense.
From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_hotel_foxtrot):
Wilco had planned on releasing Yankee Hotel Foxtrot on September 11, 2001, but Tweedy did not want a change in record labels to significantly delay the release of the album. . . . In a decision aimed at discouraging the pirating of lower quality MP3s and having some control over how the album was distributed, on September 18, 2001, . . .
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)
Also, the best track on Yankee is NOT "Jesus, etc.," which seems to be the consensus pick for non-Wilco fans, but "Ashes of American Flags," esp. in its Kicking Television incarnation w/ Nels Cline's solo.
"The cash machine is blue and green . . ."
That three-note guitar figure that keeps emerging throughout the song in the background is the perfect touch on a wonderful song.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
esp. in its Kicking Television incarnation w/ Nels Cline's solo.
All music is better with Nels Cline.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:25 (sixteen years ago)
^ This is true. Except even he couldn't save Sky Blue Sky. I want a Wilco record where they really let him loose. Having him play these strange, backwards 30 second solos at the end of "Everlasting Everything" and "One Wing" does not count.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
Wilco is fucking terrible
― Moka Pwnly (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
Remember when people cared about Sigur Ros?
Whiney, good morning!
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)
i have a really small and insignificant complaint about this list: it reads too much like a random mash up of all their previous year end lists with the words just rearranged a bit. what i really appreciate in a thing like this is when secretely wonderful album tracks replace singles, or when something that's not already been best new music'd or highly reviewed pops up, when guilty pleasures are exposed, trump cards played. the 2001-04 list was nice cause it was mostly radio jams and populist indie hits, kind of showed that pitchfork writers still know what's up even when they step out of their niche. i suppose this is kind of their big chance to formally establish the pitchfork canon as definitively as they can, but it doesn't make for a very interesting read i gotta say. good tunes, though.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
chris i gotta say at this point you might as well be mooning college kids for playing fleet foxes in the student lounge.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
I really love Sigur Ros! I got into Agaetis byrjun pre-college when a friend recommended them to me and I heard "Olsen Olsen." I also got into "( )" around that time, and I would still rank Untitled #1, #4, and #8 as some of my favorite postrock songs of the decade. "Glosoli" from Takk... has THE best postrock climax I've heard.
The "new" one from last summer is kind of bad, though.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
samosa has a point. although i was pleasantly surprised to see "The Middle" on the list all these years after that awful Bleed American review.
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
i just tried reading this thread and stopped after like the third kshighway spazz out. could anyone fill me in wrt if we at any point start talking about music or this pitchfork list?
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)
Still going through the list, and I'm THRILLED to see that "Forgot About Dre" came in at 68. Such a great song. In 8th grade, one of my best friends and I memorized the entire song and would rap it at lunch. The video, too, is hilarious.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
kinda interesting to see it higher than any other Eminem (assuming none of his other solo singles will place higher than "Real Slim Shady," "Lose Yourself" and "Without Me")
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe "Stan" will.
― Matos W.K., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
Surprised that Silent Shout placed as low as it did. I figured that would be in the top 20 fer sure.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
kinda interesting to see it higher than any other Eminem (assuming none of his other solo singles will place higher than "Real Slim Shady," "Lose Yourself" and "Without Me")― some dude, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:22 AM (3 minutes ago)
― some dude, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:22 AM (3 minutes ago)
Yeah! That's especially surprising because Eminem has been much more of a presence in the 2000s than Dre.
I also had no idea Eminem wrote "Forgot About Dre" until I read the blurb on the P2k list.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
I was confused by that info too. I would assume he meant that Em wrote HIS portion. He's written worse than "If y'all don't like me BLOW me," but nothing so trite.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
ha, totally blanked on "Stan," that will probably be higher
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
"Heartbeats" will probably be top 20. Please god not in Jose Gonzalez form though
― Number None, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
Heartbeats will certainly be top 20. no fucking doubt there.
some new thoughts:- i am SOOOOO glad i stopped reading p4k in 2004.- i am blissfully unaware of what most of these 'indie' tracks sound like.- alex in mainhattan, i've actually talked about you to friends of mine irl. and they're all like, "anyone who says things like that about amnesiac needs a head examination." it isn't just us.- kshighway, you seem to have the same taste in music that i did when i was a junior/senior in high school. which was eight/seven years ago. not a diss, i just don't understand how these things happen.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
Good display name.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
I was pleased to see "Forgot About Dre," too, because I thought it was a 1999 song. Single released in 2000, I guess.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)
the vague, ominous lyrics of most songs of amnesiac to me describe quite well the insecurity of today's world on a meta level. there is not one interpretation, there are many. we are on shaky ground. nothing is sure after 911 and the financial crisis anymore. not even the states, not even capitalism. we had forgotten about the fragility of the most powerful country and the most powerful economic concept. we were ill. we were amnesiacs. probably most of us still are, actually. maybe this is not the right thread for this discussion. shall we start a new one?
okay my last post on gaydiohead here:i just don't get you. are you a fucking suburban mom? do you even know what 'meta' means? do you watch too much msnbc? are you a blogger on huffington post? are you secretly paris hilton?
you're not speaking to anything profound. if anything, you're spouting off soundbites from the past 10 years in an obvious way just to stan for a crappy Radiohead album. please stop.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
would u say that we 'forgot' "forgot about dre"
― mark cl, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
/sorry
― mark cl, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
the table is the table, what do you mean by "i just don't understand how these things happen."?
Also, what do you listen to now? Recommend a few albums to me.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Daniel, i forgot to thank you for it. when i saw yr post, i just sang some Foreigner and was like, 'new display name time.'
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
hey here's some free advice for everybody--stop posting about how glad you are that you haven't listened to some indie rock.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
^^
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
My pleasure. I'm just comforted to know that someone at least occasionally notices my posts.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
(rare as that may be)
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)
was not nec. directed at you fwiw
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)
oh yr talkin disp names nm
^^^^^ May become my new display name.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
Talking about indie rock in a thread dedicated to P4k's end-of-the-decade list. Wow.
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway, i guess that i just don't know anyone your age who listens to that music. and i have a lot of friend who are your age. maybe it's just some weird thing, a mystery.
what i'm listening to right now?
White Rainbow New CloudsA Broken Consort The Shape LeavesLuciano Tribute to the SunLemonadeGemini In and Out of Lights and FogStars of the Lida lot of Ron Trent
so a mixture of more ambient/noisy stuff mixed with house and techno, pretty much. 99% of guitar-driven, rock-influenced music bores the shit out of me at this point.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)
Anyway, FORGOT ABOUT DRE. Shiiiiit. I really hope Detox comes out this year. We've been waiting far too long. I would've loved to see "Still Dre" on the P2k list too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erbraZmuwmI
Btw, what the fuck happened to Nate Dogg? Back in 2000 or so, it seemed like he was in half of the mainstream rap videos I was watching on MTV.
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks, table! I'm going to check out some of that stuff.
kshighway, i highly rec. White Rainbow, Stars of the Lid and A Broken Consort. seems like these could be your sort of thing, esp. the last two.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
Y'all don't like this list? BLOW ME.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
I already have Stars of the Lid's "Refinement..." record, and I love it, so I'll definitely check out the other too. A++. Thanks dude.
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
(the white rainbow doesn't come out til october... but his last record is also good, not as dreamy though)
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
also do you like Low? i am pissed that Low are definitely not going to be on this list, but i really stan for Low. so whatevs.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
Agreed. Low has become one of the best rock bands of the decade imo. They should be on the list.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
They could make the album list. Not sure which one would be selected. I love the last two, but I know I'm in the minority, especially with regards to The Great Destroyer.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)
I would've loved to see "Still Dre" on the P2k list too.
"Still" and the album came out in late '99, "Forgot" and "Next Episode" were released as singles in 2000
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)
Never heard Low. I'll look into them also.
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)
Shit, you're right. "Still" was the first single, right? Yeah. It was "Still," "Forgot . . .," then "Next Episode."
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)
I love The Great Destroyer. My favorite Low album. I think "Silver Rider" should be on the singles list, but if anything from Low will get on this list it will probably be something from Things We Lost In The Fire.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, that's the order.
daniel, i stopped listening after Great Destroyer. Things We Lost in the Fire and Trust are two of the best non-electronic records of the decade, tho, imo. but i am really into slow shit.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)
Sunflower, for sure.
all right, now i head off to write crap features on dubstep for five hours. enjoy this thread, i have been roffling all morning.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)
kshighway, i guess that i just don't know anyone your age who listens to that music.
lol @ the idea of indie rock being the province of high schoolers
also lol @ using the phrase "your age" for someone who graduated from college a year after you.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
I think "Silver Rider" should be on the singles list
Yeah! In the proper context (Tr: winter), that wordless chorus still gives me chills.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
i kinda think of indie rock fans as being mainly twenty somethings, most of my friends like a lot of haircut indie and bloghouse and santogold etc.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)
wilco aren't really indie though are they? they're way more dadrockish
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
YHF is a good album as well
Wilco is "classic indie"
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)
is that like "classic house"
i mean, they're from chicago right?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)
not all people of the same age like all the same stuff, it's true!
― dude, it's america, it happens all the time (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)
read this on a chinese cookie once but I guess you're right
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
I'm totally using "haircut indie" from now on, thx
― Matos W.K., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)
totally calling the top 20% of these pitchfork decade lists "the haircut 100" from now on
― some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
Is Haircut Indie distinct from Mustache Indie?
― Wee Tam and the lolhueg (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway)
Dude they opened for Wilco on the Sky Blue Sky tour. In fact their set was one of the best I've seen in the last five years.
― Moreno, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)
I missed them on that tour! Saw them two months ago w/ Conor Oberst, and it was very, very excellent.
― ^^^^^ May become my new display name. (kshighway), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)
basically low rules.
but great destroyer isn't that great, esp compared to "things we lost in the fire" or all the albums that came out before it.
but it's still good.
― dude, it's america, it happens all the time (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)
Drums & Guns = the bestest.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)
What I like about The Great Destroyer is that it's so dark and heavy. With the exception of Drums and Guns, Low have gotten louder and more demonstrative with each album. The Great Destroyer seems to me like the fullest realization of their sound.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)
but great destroyer isn't that great
I guess the criticism of The Great Destroyer is that it is too generic and loses some of Low's unique slowcore charm. But (a) I thought the more aggressive, revved-up sound was a jarring and welcome development and (b) the album was sort of a gateway to Drums & Guns, which seemed like a perfect blend of Low's various sounds and aesthetics.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
Two Dans, thinking alike.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, breaker is awesome, I figure Breaker or sunflowers are gonna make the list.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
i liked monkey but the rest of the great destroyer kinda passed me by
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
Nels Cline played some lap steel with Low during that set iirc. They played some 20 minute instrumental piece with him that was one of the most beautiful things I've ever heard. (xpost)
Think I'm gonna listen to their "In The Fishtank" with the Dirty 3 right now.
― Moreno, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
0_0 Wow! I would love to have seen that show.
Low is such a low-key band, tho. If they haven't been on the list up to now, I have little hope they'll make it in the Top 50. I'd love to see them there, tho.
Someone upthread suggested a category in these lists for bands that didn't have a huge single "statement" album or song, to avoid them getting lost in the shuffle. The example they gave was Spoon, but I think Low is an even better example. In any event, I think that would be an interesting list.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)
"(That's How You Sing) Amazing Grace" and "Canada" from Trust are also great. That whole album is fantastic.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
Sunflowers has been used in a lot of movies and tv shows though iirc and its a slow burn under the radar "oh you love that song too?" kinda thing, so I wouldn't be too surprised if you guys were surprised
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
i don't have a problem with them going for a fuller sound i just think a lot of the songs on destroyer feel like filler.
The Low Christmas shows they used to do at First Ave were amazing, would have pine tree forest onstage and a small church choir from Duluth and some members of a Duluth newgrass band called Trampled by Turtles.
they did Merry Xmas (War is over) by Lennon it was pretty transporting
― dude, it's america, it happens all the time (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)
Spoon did have a big single with 'way we get by' didn't they?
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
Well, looking back at the track-listing, it has more filler than I remember. But the highpoints -- e.g., Monkey, California, Silver Rider, Step, and Death Of A Salesman -- are extraordinary.
I think Spoon's biggest hit was The Underdog, no?
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
"in the drugs" and "amazing grace" are wicked wicked songs. I was thinking Johnny Cash's Hurt was missing too but it'll very probably end up in the top 50.
xpost: Well, my young brother and his friends all have 'the way we get by' on their ipods but checking out on wikipedia I just found out that it was featured on the OC. No idea how good Underdog did on the charts. I thought their best selling singles were 'i turn my camera on' and 'the way we get by' but I've honestly no idea.
― Moka, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
yeah like i said it's still a good album, they are always good IMO
But no album with "Broadway (So Many People)" can ever step to Secret Name or Things We Lost or Curtain Hits the Cast
― dude, it's america, it happens all the time (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
jaymc, i'm nearly four years older than kshighway. remember, not everyone takes the same amount of time to finish lolcollege.
Low's best album is clearly "Curtain Hits the Cast." no fuckin question, imo.
― I want to know what "Crunk" is. I want you to show me. (the table is the table), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
"It's easy to think of a site like PF as being this single-voiced monolith (especially when many of the writers bring a similar tone, esp. in blurbs), when in reality it's just a swath of individual specialists coming together and reporting from their neck of the woods. Like you, I'm sure a good portion of their writing staff is oblivious to artists and songs that are gushed about in neighboring PF circles, and their WTF Flags were flying high as well when they read that list."
Just want to say that ^^^^^ is very true. I voted in this thing and I probably know less of the tracks that actually won than most of you. It's not quite as straightforward a process as simply tabulating everyone's individual lists, but it's not far off it either.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)
secret name imo
― Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)
The way the site's writers cover different niches now makes me pretty excited to see how the album list shakes out. We always talk about how album lists sometimes turn out a little unexciting, based on "consensus" stuff, right? (I'm sure that'll still be part of it, and it's sort of a good thing: a great, obvious, well-loved record shouldn't drop off the list just because nobody's excited to vote for it.) But I have this feeling that the different niches might possibly throw up some surprises, some stuff that wasn't the obvious top thing in its genre but appealed to everyone over time. Someone said they were happy to see McLusky on the singles list, and maybe that's a good example: not some big standard, but the kind of thing where people who mostly listen to dance music or rap might eventually hear it and go yeah, that's an awesome and interesting rock track. I really have no idea how it'll turn out, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some consensus accumulating not just around the big obvious indie releases, but around some lower-lying things that struck everyone as interesting.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
This thread. All the inane bloodcurdling pissiness mixed with languid OTM goofiness we've come to know and love about ILM. It's like watching Wayne Rooney and Dimitar Berbatov figure out how to play together.
Anyway, all the more recent Low talk is great, and I wanted to add that "Pissing" is another standout from The Great Destroyer, plus I'd throw in "Murderer" from Drums and Guns too.
Although, I've never been able to decide which of their albums is my favourite. Definitely one of the rock bands of the decade, so consistent, so beautiful.
― Lostandfound, Thursday, 20 August 2009 01:45 (sixteen years ago)
I'd throw in "Murderer" from Drums and Guns too.
100% agreed.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 01:48 (sixteen years ago)
Oh god, I just listened to "Dragonfly" and (surprise, it's Low, after all) after an agonizing slow-build, that chorus, fuck: "Maybe you're right". Heartstopping.
― Lostandfound, Thursday, 20 August 2009 02:00 (sixteen years ago)
One . . . More . . . Day . . . Left . . .
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)
Not going to see what wins it until Sunday but on the bus earlier I got bored and tried to figure out what the top 20 will be. So, in any order
Crazy In LoveIgnition RemixBlindLast Nite (and maybe Hard To Explain)CrazyGet Your Freak OnAll My Friends (and maybe one of them big early singles like Losing My Edge or Yeah)Drop It Like Its HotMapsHeartbeat?Heartbeats?BOBHey YaMy Girls?Gold Digger?Paper Planes?99 Problems?House of Jealous Lovers?One More Time?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)
Bah. That top 20 would displease me. And I think this has been a great decade for music.
I'm a rockist, I guess. Worse yet, I'm an indie rockist, I guess.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)
Have a suspicion there'll be a Broken Social Scene song in there. And maybe The Walkmen - "The Rat."
― Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)
Couldn't think of what ridiculously big indie songs I'd missed that wasn't already on the list. If it was a britisher list I'd say Bloc Party. Wake Up by Arcade Fire seems like their signiture tune now, maybe?
Oh yeah, I forgot the rat. Love that song.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)
Just remembered a song I don't remember making the list that I think should have: Benga and Coki - Night. Oh well.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
Oh yeah and the entry for "Someday" says it's the highest Strokes song on the list so no Hard to Explain or Last Nite.
― Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)
Bah to Arcade Fire. The Rat's a great, furious rock song. But the band has been such a letdown overall that I'm not excited to see that song on the list (I wouldn't mind it, tho).
Was hoping to see something from Richard Hawley's album Cole's Corner somewhere on the list, but that possibility ended about 182 selections ago (I'd have it in my top 10, but I'm an outlier, obv.).
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)
Couple dark horses that could sneak in:
Roscoe--MidlakeIdioteque--Radiohead (my pick for number 1)Your Little Hoodrat Friend--The Hold SteadyTrapped In The Closet--R KellyRehab--Amy Winehouse
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)
how many people voted for this btw?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)
Roscoe already on the list somewhere.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)
If Trapped In The Closet makes it, I will be incredibly bloody happy.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)
Is Madvillain on the list already? I'd like to see something from them.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)
America's Most Blunted was in there somewhere
― Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)
Here's the 24 I figured would have a chance (positions on previous Pitchfork lists in parens):
Kanye West – Through the Wire (#89, 2000-04)Kanye West – Gold Digger (#25, 2005) The Walkmen – The Rat (#6, 2004; #33, 2000-04)Missy Elliott – Get Ur Freak On (#4, 2000-04)Interpol – PDA (“Interpol EP” #32, 2000-04)OutKast – B.O.B. (#1, 2000-04)OutKast – Hey Ya (#1, 2003; #2, 2000-04)Daft Punk – One More Time (#27, 2000-04)Jay-Z – 99 Problems (#2, 2004; #22, 2000-04)The Strokes – Last Nite (--)Annie – Heartbeat (#1, 2004; #6, 2000-04)The Knife – Heartbeats (--)Beyonce – Crazy in Love (#2, 2003; #7, 2000-04)Gnarls Barkley – Crazy (#36, 2005)Hercules and Love Affair – Blind (#1, 2008)M.I.A. – Paper Planes (#4, 2007)Rapture – House of Jealous Lovers (#4, 2003; #9, 2000-04)LCD Soundsystem – Losing My Edge (#3, 2000-04)LCD Soundsystem – Yeah (#5, 2004; #19, 2000-04)LCD Soundsystem – All My Friends (#1, 2007)Yeah Yeah Yeahs – Maps (#28, 2003; #10, 2000-04)R. Kelly – Ignition (Remix) (#15, 2003; #12, 2000-04)Nelly – Hot in Herre (#34, 2000-04)Eminem – Stan (#58, 2000-04)
There are a couple of those that I wouldn't have predicted would be top 20 songs, but if they don't make the top 20, then I'll be surprised that they didn't make the top 500 at all.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)
Ah, didn't see that. All right, scratch that. Three more to go.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)
That's a pretty pop/hip-hop heavy top 20 for an indie-focused music site.
I'm actually not complaining about that list. A lot of good songs on it.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)
Would love to see Annie's song in the top 5, but it's not gonna happen.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)
Has Animal Collective's My Girls made the list yet? If not, look for that one, I'd say.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
I'd bet you'll lose "Yeah," "PDA," Eminem and Nelly at least. I wouldn't be surprised if "One More Time" didn't make the cut either. I'd bet they'll sneak in Portishead's "Machine Gun" and I wouldn't be surprised if Animal Collective's "My Girls" made it, too (though I'm holding out hope for "Happy House" by The Juan MacLean).
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
I really wish the first installment of We Are the World (as referenced here: Ryan Pitchfork crawls out of his indie cave) were archived on the Wayback Machine.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
i thought p4k writers would be a little too self conscious to actually vote for my girls
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
Self-conscious in what sense?
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
I wouldn't be surprised if "One More Time" didn't make the cut either
you wouldn't be surprised if 'one more time' somehow didn't make it into their top 500 songs???
― iatee, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)
http://web.archive.org/web/20031206165508/http://pitchforkmedia.com/wearetheworld/
xp to jaymc
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)
And how about a song from Twin Cinema? Maybe The Bleeding Heart Show or Sing Me Spanish Techno.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)
i just mean like, pre-empting the obvious canon building kneejerks
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)
yeah no way is "Hot In Herre" gonna be up there
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)
It's interesting to see which songs from 2009 have been considered great enough to make the list:
115 Dirty Projectors – Stillness Is The Move162 Grizzly Bear – Two Weeks206 Bat For Lashes – Daniel228 Phoenix – 1901334 Grizzly Bear – While You Wait For The Others345 Antony & The Johnsons – Aeon357 Japandroids – Young Hearts Spark Fire372 Camera Obscura – French Navy374 The Pains Of Being Pure At Heart – Young Adult Friction401 The Walkmen – In The New Year475 Kid Cudi vs. Crookers – Day ‘N Night (remix)492 St. Vincent – Strangers497 Woods – Rain On500 The Big Pink - Velvet
Kind of an odd list. I imagine that there are newer songs that would be included if there were more time for them to sink in.
― Dan S, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, given that list, something from MPP's got to be in the top 20.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)
My Girls?
― Dan S, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
That's my guess.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:47 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
That's not the first installment. The first installment had Ryan Schreiber presenting an 80-minute mix of pop and hip-hop songs to the Pitchfork readership, to ease them into the idea that the site would gradually start to cover that stuff. I dunno, I just think it'd be funny to look at in retrospect.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)
There are going to be some left field choices, otherwise what's the point of doing something like this. Obvious songs like Bombs Over Baghdad, Hey Ya, Crazy and Paper Planes will still be in there, but some will most likely get left out, too.
Since it's pitchfork, there has to be at least 1 animal collective and 1 radiohead in top 20. My Girls and Idioteque, I bet.
Another dark horse: Wilco, Heavy Metal Drummer
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)
ohok, sorry
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
my top 20 guess:
99 problemslcd - yeahthe ratrehabhappy houseall my friendssummertime clothesignition remixpaper planesannie - heartbeathouse of jealous loversmapscrazy in lovehey yabobidiotequecrazyget ur freak onblindlosing my edge/beat connection
― abanana, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)
THe first installment of the We Are The World thing is under Inauguration in the bottom left of the sidebar.
― Number None, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)
Nice, thanks!
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)
xxxxxxxxxxxxpost
alan sparhawk is the most punk
― cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)
oof i forgot all about 'we are the world'
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)
p4k also seem to be really into mentioning how junior senior are "gay/straight," its like this bizarre moment where people of different sexuality collaborate. Weird how grizzly bear aren't gay/straight or um, REM or Husker Du
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)
Well if y'all assuming lcd soundsystem will end up with 2 songs in the top 20 I might as well throw in I expect to see both 'idioteque' and 'the national anthem' in there too.
― Moka, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)
to be fair, "I'm gay / he's straight" is genuinely part of Junior Senior's, like, schtick
(I don't mean "schtick" in a negative way)
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:13 (sixteen years ago)
Dark horse choices (unless they were already on the list and I missed them):
Also, I'd love to see Studio on the list, but I'm not hopeful.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)
xp, really? around the time of "everybody" it was just 8bit graphics iirc, might be my persp tho
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)
Oh, wait! Has Iron & Wine made the list? Maybe them, and rightly so!
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)
this thread is still going on. without discussing the interesting stuff like albums capturing spirits of decades and stuff. never mind. go on. i'll try to abstain.
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
Sorry dood, I don't think you're going to get your wish on any of those. There are too many straight-up classics among the list I posted to be edged out by "something by Iron & Wine." I am starting to think that "My Girls" has a shot, though.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
xpost - I seem to remember various lyrics on the first JS record that were kinda like "hey ladies, step my way" / "hey fellas, step mine."
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)
alex it's entirely possible that people will start discussing albums when PF finishes posting the singles list and begins posting the albums list. that's just a theory, though.
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)
xpost Yeah, I mean http://lyricwiki.org/Junior_Senior:Chicks_And_Dicks
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
the hope dies last as we say in german.
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
german is really like english then?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
Is Air France already on the list?
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
Sorry dood, I don't think you're going to get your wish on any of those. There are too many straight-up classics among the list I posted to be edged out by "something by Iron & Wine."
Well, then there's no hope for something from Jagged Little Pill Acoustic by Alanis Morissette.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
kind of. i think it was first. english is a mixture of german, french and some weird celtic stuff, i guess.
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
(j/k). Seriously, I wouldn't be surprised to see Iron & Wine in the top 20. Not predicting it, by any means. Maybe Bird Stealing Bread.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah Jaymc's list is pretty much what I'm expecting, minus Interpol, one or both of the Kanye's and The Strokes and plus My Girls, Maps, Machine Gun and maybe Happy House. I know that's still more than 20 but genuinely can't imagine them leaving any of these out of the 500.
― Gavin in Leeds, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
i still think you have to factor in at least a little sef-conscious fear of playing exactly to type, but then that's pretty paranoid for a website I enjoy and try not to take the piss out of as much as alla u
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
I have no idea how you pick a single from an act like Iron & Wine (since, AFAIK, they don't really release them?), but "Naked as We Came" from Our Endless Numbered might be a good pick.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
Re "Bird Stealing Bread": I think a song from 2002 that didn't make their top 100 tracks of 2000-04 has a pretty tough road to hoe at this point.
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)
And yeah, I agree Heartbeat has to place.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
naked as we came was used in a great corny/effective way in Tarnation btw, and kinda sets the standard for emotional youtube slideshow musics
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)
Probably right. I'm projecting.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
So kinda more interesting question: What do you guys think the #1 song is going to be? I kinda think "Maps" would be the perfect song for PFM to pick as their #1 (and I wouldn't be terribly disappointed by the choice either).
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
something by arcade fire
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)
guys, iron and wine is not making the top 20.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)
guys will 'crank dat' be there
― mark cl, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)
Didn't think they were. I don't think Iron & Wine should make the singles list. I do hope they place at least two of their albums on the album list.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)
half serious question tbh
I think "It Wasn't Me" and "Hot in Herrre" were two of the best 500 (!) singles of the decade, and I gotta imagine PFM just forgot about them.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)
"Collapsing at Your Doorstep" is #148. Still not sure why people like that better than "No Excuses."
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)
― Gavin in Leeds, Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:33 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
what is 'machine gun'?
― butthurt (deej), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)
don't you know the mighty portishead?
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
oh. yeah i doubt that makes it
― butthurt (deej), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)
i think i don't really like indie rock anymore maybe?
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)
B.O.B. won the 2000-04 one, right? I'm going for 3. B.O.B., 2. Hey Ya, 1. Maps
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)
deej, did you vote? that is a list i'd be interested to see.
i find it's a lot easier to like some but not all indie rock and not have huge freakouts and identity crises about that if i just think of it as being a genre made up of lots of different people with different interests and imagine that consensus is impossible to measure and that noone's individual tastes need to have any relationship to anyone else's.
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
but i'm a dreamer.
i had the exact same reaction to the radiohead song coming after classic clipse & classic jt & classic rihanna that i would have had if they had posted a youtube video of "never gonna give you up"
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)
That's what I was trying to say upthread, J0rdan.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I don't think "Machine Gun" makes it, either.
PFM Top 10 of 2008 (Placement on Decade List)
1. Blind (not placed)2. White Winter Hymnal (66)3. Ready for the Floor (76)4. L.E.S. Artistes (151)5. Kim and Jessie (256)6. Nothing Ever Happened (81)7. Hearts on Fire (102)8. Collapsing at Your Doorstep (148)9. Machine Gun (not placed)10. American Boy (238)
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)
I put Astley at #1, but apparently Youtube reissues didn't qualify as "00s"
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)
also I dunno what the top 20 will be, but you know, "no Avril, no credibility"
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)
"My Love" was ranked way way too high imo. if that's 2nd highest ranking Timbo track (or, more likely, 3rd if "Get Ur Freak On" is top 20) it'll be pretty fucked up.
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, just meant that the stuff from the early 00's that I liked then, I still like a lot and a lot of it is very consensus stuff, the consensus stuff I like from post 05 I like a lot less and it feels a bit workaday on the list, while obv it is no more or less deserving of praise or whatever than the stuff I like, i dunno
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:49 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
joined too late for singles, voted on albums
― butthurt (deej), Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
Agreed jmc wrt "no excuses"
Mordy cut it out with the tiring singles/tracks dichotomy, please. I basically agree with what you're saying but it's not explicitly a singles list
Xposts
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)
yeah... i mean that's always going to be my biggest reservation about these lists but at a certain point there's no point in talking about that
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
Fuck you, k3v. Like me pointing that out is more tedious than posting guesses of the top 20 of PFM's list eight hours before they just post the fucking thing?
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
no it's not more tiring than hassling over rules that they themselves imposed because hey it's their site!
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)
callin a dude out by his GOOGLE-PROOFED name when shit gets heated
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)
It's his posting name, dude?
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
Look, guys, I know we're all really hot about the new results list, but let's take a step back and some few breaths and give out some bro-hugs. We can't let PF top singles of decade List get between us.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
i meant as opposed to callin a dude out by his ACTUAL name when shit gets heated
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)
I wouldn't be surprised if it *was* in there, either. It just seems like they're trying to slim down some of the selections from the mid-decade countdown, and "Digital Love" is chillin at number 23 (or 22?) I also doubt that Kanye will snag two slots--I'll bet that "Gone" took "Gold Digger"s place.
I don't know how "The Rat" snuck into the Top 20, but I can't imagine them wholly leaving it off--especially since it's mentioned in one of the blurbs.
Also, it's interesting that all the songs on the list from 2009 are rock songs. Where's "9x Outta 10"?
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
i feel like most of their pop/rap choices gathered consensus over time. "Blame It" or something might be on the year-end singles list, but it's not gonna be anywhere here yet.
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)
There are going to be some left field choices, otherwise what's the point of doing something like this.
Depends on how they compiled the list. If it was a straight vote, probably note. If it was composed, you're right, there'll probably be a curve ball or two (here's hoping it's "Happy House").
― Parenthetical Grillz, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
it's hard for me to get up in arms about lists like this...
just because it's not like this is ACTUALLY the best music of the decade it's just "sort of the best music that a website like pitchfork would put in its best music of the decade list"
just like rolling stone "best albums of all time" are just "the best 100 albums of the sort that rolling stone would generally put in a list like this"
― cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
I'm kinda more interested in what RS would pick as their best 100 albums. I feel like it'd be a bit more surprising maybe?
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)
I agree, M@tt. It's interesting to me from an intellectual standpoint; I don't really get people who are like "I can't BELIEVE so-and-so didn't make the list! This is an OUTRAGE!!"
― jaymc, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)
Only if its top 20 wasn't filled with, say, various comeback discs from Bruce Springsteen, The Rolling Stones, Steely Dan, The Eagles, zzzzzzzzzz . . . .
Has Foghat had a comeback album this decade?
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure Bruce Springsteen is the only act out of that few that would place on RS's top 20.
― Mordy, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
Tomorrow's top 10 today:
10. Tori Alamaze - Don't Cha (fuck a Pussycat Dolls)9. Avalanches - Since I Left You8. Bon Jovi - It's My Life7. Qb's Finest - Oochie Wally6. Drowning Pool - Bodies (gets me pretty pumped)5. Boredoms - 77 Boadrum (even though I got a nasty sunburn)4. Three 6 Mafia feat. UGK and Project Pat - Sippin' On Some Syrup3. Daft Punk - One More Time2. M.I.A. - Paper Planes1. Santana feat. Michelle Branch - The Game of Love
I have this on good authority.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)
Mordy: Yeah, that may be. I'm really not looking forward to the Rolling Stone list, tho. It will certainly be more surprising to me than Pitchfork's list, but only because I expect so little from Rolling Stone at this point.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)
I think songs like "9X Outta 10" and "Pretty Wings" would have made this list if they had come out earlier this year.
― Dan S, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
or in 2003
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)
That Santana/Branch mention reminds me that I really, really like "They-Say Vision" by Res. That's quite definitely one of my 500 favorite songs of the decade. This is why I suck at lists, I think: it's really hard to mentally sort through the stuff that isn't important or era-defining or super-memorable enough to leap into your memory at the right moment.
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
Springsteen is the only act out of that few that would place on RS's top 20.
Love and Theft and Modern Times will both be on many decade-end lists. Dylan's on a prolonged hot streak.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 20 August 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)
Dylan wasn't listed in "that few"
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Friday, 21 August 2009 00:00 (fifteen years ago)
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:52 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
did you vote for her album?
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 00:10 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't -- the reason I'm mentioning it is because Res somehow never popped into my head during the whole process.
― don't kill children, don't run 'em over (nabisco), Friday, 21 August 2009 00:14 (fifteen years ago)
Yeeaaahhhh, but I should have mentioned him. Dylan will be to Rolling Stone's best-album-of-the-decade list what Radiohead will be to Pitchfork's best-album-of-the-decade list.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 01:08 (fifteen years ago)
So far (this might be wrong):5 DFA 11 rough trade8 songs that have kanye in them some way. (Anyone have a count on Timbaland?)19 from XL12 Domino11 Virgin48 from 200014 from 2009 3 from Modular, go Modular, heh.etc
― Popture, Friday, 21 August 2009 02:25 (fifteen years ago)
9 on 4AD (10 if you count staring at the sun), not bad
― you! me! posting! (electricsound), Friday, 21 August 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
only 2 songs from 2009 in 200-21
― abanana, Friday, 21 August 2009 03:44 (fifteen years ago)
One more's coming up.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 03:49 (fifteen years ago)
8. Bon Jovi - It's My Life
haha this would make the list worth it IMO
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 21 August 2009 03:58 (fifteen years ago)
8 songs that have kanye in them some way. (Anyone have a count on Timbaland?)
9 Timbaland, 9 Neptunes, 7 Jay-Z, 5 Dr. Dre, 4 Lil Wayne, 4 T.I.
you counting the Alicia Keys remix in the Kanye column or not?
― best of the madmen slog (some dude), Friday, 21 August 2009 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
Wait wait, here's the fact I want: how many songs have appeared on an American "Now What's What I Call Music" compilation?
― Cunga, Friday, 21 August 2009 04:50 (fifteen years ago)
and its up
― Moka, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:02 (fifteen years ago)
Booya to whoever it was backthread who didn't believe me outkast would get #1
― Moka, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:03 (fifteen years ago)
And no, no black horseys.
― Moka, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:04 (fifteen years ago)
lol I missed this at first: It goes without saying that "Blind" captivates any dancefloor.
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 21 August 2009 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
All of my many caveats aside, it's a good list, and there's some very good writing attached.
― Matos W.K., Friday, 21 August 2009 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
It was fun to read. I hadn't read pitchfork regularly since 2004, so it was fun to return to it for the review.
― Cunga, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
DFA has four in the last twenty.
― Popture, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:51 (fifteen years ago)
Great song, but I hate how he writes: "and product placements ("Yo quiero Taco Bell") that read like the world's first Twitter feed.", as if that is an inspiring reason it is ahead of its time (kind of a stretch too as an example). I feel like he is subtly hinting at Twitter as an important cultural phenomenon. I just hate Twitter- it is the worst example of our cultural need to spew digital brain vomit.
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ My Girls being top 10. It's not even in the top 5 on MPP.
How exactly in the hell did "All My Friends" place higher than "Losing My Edge"?
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
the bettersongness aspect prolly
― iatee, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
who cares
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:13 (fifteen years ago)
the 99 problemz blurb is wacky. i normally like mark p but ... his 'real' crossover???
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
― butthurt (deej), Friday, August 21, 2009 1:13 AM (4 minutes ago)
― Yeah, well, jazz isn't exactly in love with Johnny either. (bug), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:18 (fifteen years ago)
With respect to "Hard Knock Life", this was Jay-Z's real crossover moment, the single that catapulted him out of hip-hop superstardom and into the real mainstream vernacular.
http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/2471208/2/istockphoto_2471208_bewildered_businessman_mchipster228.jpg
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
i cant wait until next decade is over
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
i mean i know mark p. is from london and all but what... the... fuck...
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
With respect to "P2K", this was Pitchfork's real crossover moment, the list that catapulted them out of internet magazine superstardom and into the real ILX vernacular.
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
The list is pretty damn solid. If I was gonna make my own list, it would pretty much look like their hip-hop choices minus the mid-decade stumping for trap-rap and dipset
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:29 (fifteen years ago)
I can see the "99 Problems" thing. None of my white friends were into Jay-Z until that came out.
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:29 (fifteen years ago)
― Yeah, well, jazz isn't exactly in love with Johnny either. (bug), Friday, August 21, 2009 1:18 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i care more about that than lcd stansystem fans arguing over which single of the two that placed in the top 20 is better
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, August 21, 2009 1:29 AM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
which tracks are you excluding here?
do yr shoulders bruise from patting yourself on the back so hard
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:31 (fifteen years ago)
i'm patting myself on the back because I'm saying I like 80% of p4k's rap choices?
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:31 (fifteen years ago)
― butthurt (deej), Friday, August 21, 2009 2:30 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
Good for you. imo, "Losing My Edge" probably placed right. But I wouldn't have even put "All My Friends" in the top 100.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:33 (fifteen years ago)
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, August 21, 2009 1:29 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
get new white friends
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:35 (fifteen years ago)
http://a484.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/59/l_be3c35a97063366413fecf18441a5c83.gif
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:37 (fifteen years ago)
Even if the twitter comment is OTM you could get into the critical debate over whether being influential equals being worthwhile. Talking about how "important" and what a touchstone, say, "Is This It?" was doesn't get into the issue of whether it was any good.
In my opinion, too much criticism focuses on influence and not enough on whether or not and why something is great per se. The blurbs can be repetitive when they're little more than a secret history of indie rock trends.
Around when 99 Problems came out I remember this teenage would-be record producer of my friend's band lecturing us kids on why Jay-Z wasn't gangta rap because "he raps about clothes and shit. That's not gangsta rap. That's totally different." So there were a lot of misconceptions about Jay-Z at the time.
― Cunga, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:41 (fifteen years ago)
xxp: Seriously, I don't think I knew anyone white who took Jay-Z seriously until "99 Problems" came out, even hiphop dudes. I found it kind of confounding at the time that only black dudes and chicks listened to Jay-Z. Obviously, this is my limited anecdotal evidence, I'm sure your circles were a lot more hip than mine, whatever.
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:42 (fifteen years ago)
idk man - i remember "big pimpin" & "i just wanna luv u" & "can i get a..." & "izzo" & "dirt off your shoulder" all being pretty big mainstream crossover successes. maybe it got every last white person on the planet but i mean cmon, the guy had like 6 #1 albums before "99 problems" was released. just an asinine statement.
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
Keep in mind that I grew up in a pretty square place.
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
like i remember "big pimpin" being big at bar mitzvahs and shit but yeah maybs you are right and i did have hipper, cooler white friends (all of them were jews fwiw)
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
And I'm not saying dudes didn't fuck with his party songs or whatever, saying they didn't take him seriously as an artist.
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
Should have made that distinction clearer.
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
i think the idea that "99 problems" made jay-z more respected except to ppl who were completely & utterly oblivious beforehand (this is like such a small portion of the listening audience) is really wrong
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:50 (fifteen years ago)
and why is it even notable then that it made jay-z respected by all types of white people? who cares? you could say that about probably 100 songs on that list and it wouldn't mean anything for any of them
"Hard Knock Life" was polled in 2008 as VH1 viewers' choice for best Jay-Z song if that drives home Jordan's point any further
― een, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:52 (fifteen years ago)
hard knock life is one of the worst things ever. god, so irritating
― Yeah, well, jazz isn't exactly in love with Johnny either. (bug), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:52 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.tvacres.com/images/bug_raid2.jpg
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
Fwiw, I have white friends who still try to clown on me for liking Wayne. One of them said "Live Your Life" was the first T.I. song he could respect. :(
een: not sure exactly what your point is?
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:56 (fifteen years ago)
99 Problems is still the only Jay-Z song I can reliably get away with playing at indie music type club nights.
It's a bit weird what Hip-hop has and has not made it to Australia. T.I. and Lil Wayne still get blank stares.
― Popture, Friday, 21 August 2009 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
blender really beat pitchfork to the BOB canonizing punch
― jerk store (hmmmm), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure B.O.B. has been canon since roundabout when Stankonia came out, dude
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know, ms. jackson won pazz and jop....
― jerk store (hmmmm), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:03 (fifteen years ago)
and "B.O.B." came in third
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:05 (fifteen years ago)
Really fucking glad to see BOB voted the best song of the decade, especially considering it will be forgotten by every other publication who will just stump for Hey Ya and forget it.
xpost - ok, I only really know uk publications so maybe not.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
I remember when "B.O.B." came out, I was totally gassed, thinking it was the future of music. Boy was I wrong.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 07:09 (fifteen years ago)
Also, Paper Planes WTF. Sure, put it in the top 500 but third best song of the decade? Oh well, great read, thank you pitchfork writers.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:11 (fifteen years ago)
yean nvm reverend you are right. i'm just bitter ignition didn't win
― jerk store (hmmmm), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:16 (fifteen years ago)
As much as I love this band, Ween doesn't have any especially definitive songs from the past 10 years, except for "Where'd The Cheese Go" which actually should be in this, but I guess it wasn't obvious enough.
I enjoyed Agaetis Byrjun (or whatever it's called) just a few days ago..
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 07:32 (fifteen years ago)
I personally consider most of Pitchfork's choices from 2007, 2008 or 2009 to be overrated.. Somehow I think I stopped agreeing with the general consensus of "best new music" over the past 3 years.
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
Ummm call me old fashioned but the definitive Paper Planes is the original..
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
yeah saying that you can't pick just one "paper planes" is also asinine
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 07:43 (fifteen years ago)
no zonday no credibility
― (ƨnɘhqɘϯƧ ƨ1ϯɿuƆ) | HI!!!!! | (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:06 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.coffeeandcode.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/haters_gonna_hate.gif
― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:08 (fifteen years ago)
^______^
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 08:09 (fifteen years ago)
Perhaps picking up a Paper planes remix was the dark horse.
― Moka, Friday, 21 August 2009 08:28 (fifteen years ago)
"Not a phrase is wasted: When the Mountain Goats' John Darnielle started a message board thread on 100 reasons for this song's greatness, every single fraction of "Ignition (Remix)" got its own nomination (and the list went well beyond 100)."
Haha
― ecuador_with_a_c, Friday, 21 August 2009 08:34 (fifteen years ago)
paper planes and all my friends = not deserving of placements that high AT ALL.but generally a good list and pleased to see deerhoof and fuck buttons in there. think it was let down in general on the dance/electro side a bit. basement jaxx and spiller = :-(
― Jamie_ATP, Friday, 21 August 2009 08:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.utilitarianism.com/gautama-buddha.jpg
― i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:09 (fifteen years ago)
paper planes and all my friends = not deserving of placements that high AT ALL.
otm, but still more deserving than the bullshit in 8-10
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
im keeping it posi in the 09 but can i just say with heartfelt heartfeltness here - paper planes and all my friends are some abysmal BS
― You are Rebels! You are all yankees (country matters), Friday, 21 August 2009 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
especially paper planes, my god that song sucks ass on every conceivable level
― You are Rebels! You are all yankees (country matters), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:00 (fifteen years ago)
I must've missed the 'We Are The World'-feeling that song ignited according to Sherburne
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 21 August 2009 10:03 (fifteen years ago)
i got more of a 'god her vocals don't get less annoying, hmm gunshot samples are sounding ancient nowadays, wow these lyrics are bad' type feeling
― Jamie_ATP, Friday, 21 August 2009 10:23 (fifteen years ago)
Paper Planes is fun. Possibly not third best song of decade level of fun however.
― Number None, Friday, 21 August 2009 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
'Here was another outsider, this one a Sri Lankan Tamil raised in a London slum who won over listeners with global-minded beats and revolutionary chic. '
^didn't she go to an art school? Or did I imagine that. Wasn't that where the first album came from? Is this like punk all over again?
― Popture, Friday, 21 August 2009 10:55 (fifteen years ago)
i think Paper Planes is still pretty good, normal caveats of MIA aside (lyrics a bit uhh, neither scenius nor genius etc...), but no way should it be that high. i would have rather have had Boyz or Jimmy on the list if a single had to be taken from that album. but i guess it's a hotly debated/touted indie/internet creation that made it big and had crossover appeal, therefore justifying the countless hours of navel-gazing debate and is thus representative of what the 2000's were.
or not. dig the clash sample tho.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
do you guys think "freakfolk" bands like CocoRoco will be shunned on p4k list because its "meme capacity" is all time low?― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:33 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:33 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
what happened 2 the band "new weird amrca"? did they break up?― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:34 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― CaptainLaRoux (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 01:34 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
"Are" "you" Carles?
― ecuador_with_a_c, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
eh decent list when all was said and done.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
He's from Canada. Lives in London.
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:26 (fifteen years ago)
Rehab?
― Mordy, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
No, no, no.
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:29 (fifteen years ago)
i thought mark p left london ages ago
― unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
Uh guys you do realize that an ILM poll would come up with more or less the same songs, right?
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
Anyway, good call, those of you who were saying "Idioteque" and "something by Arcade Fire" yesterday.
"Idioteque" is the highest-ranking song that was eligible for the 2000-04 list but didn't make it.
Conversely, the highest-ranking song on the 2000-04 list that didn't show up here: LCD Soundsystem's "Yeah," which placed 19th back then.
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
The only bullshit line I've seen is in the "99 Problems" blurb, where once again a simple glance at a Joel Whitburn Billboard Top 40 book would have settled the matter. I mean, "Bonnie and Clyde '03" is his biggest solo hit, for chrissakes.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
Only glanced briefly at #50-1 but if you overlook Animal Collective and Spoon that's a pretty decent list all in. Did Pitchfork never rep for the Strokes/Stripes that much? They seem to be pretty low in comparison to all the Pitchfork-friendly whiney college indie.
― Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Friday, 21 August 2009 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
I think I know what Mark is trying to get at, but the phrase "mainstream vernacular" is too vague. It's not that it was the first song of Jay-Z's to do well on the charts, but it might have been the first Jay-Z song that my dad knew, for instance. And certainly, as the Rev indicates, the Rick Rubin production meant that it was the first Jay-Z song that a lot of people who were otherwise only into rock music got into.
(Meanwhile, I'm envious if you've got a Whitburn book with Jay-Z in it. My edition's from 1992.)
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
No Scott Walker, no cred.
― Jeff, Friday, 21 August 2009 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
^^^^^^^^^^ OTM. 'Clara' deserved to be in this at the very least
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 21 August 2009 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Was there any country on the list? I've only glanced it over each morning, and can't remember. I get what their target demographic expects, and that's cool; but did e.g. Sugarland or Taylor Swift or Miranda Lambert make the list?
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Friday, 21 August 2009 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
Yeeeah Mitcham isn't exactly a 'London slum'. And going to St Martins Art College isn't really very slummy either. It's basically the artworld equivalent of Oxbridge.
― Jamie_ATP, Friday, 21 August 2009 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
I didnt see much country or metal :-(
― Jamie_ATP, Friday, 21 August 2009 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
PFM doesn't review country.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 August 2009 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
They do metal and drone though... Could've (should've?) chosen a bit more adventurous or experimental music even. I mean, no Fennesz for instance?
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 21 August 2009 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
wait for the albums list, jeez.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
I think there was a Fennesz song on the list. (xp)
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
Caecilia by Fennesz was in there somewhere
― Number None, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
Huh, for some reason I remember them covering Miranda Lambert, but it was a while ago.
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
― Number None, vrijdag 21 augustus 2009 13:01 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
Missed it then, mea culpa!
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 21 August 2009 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
was a decent list for sure. usually tho i think the top 10 are the most boring in any of their lists. maybe just b/c i'm overexposed (B.O.B. in this case) or i just never got into them at all (LCD)
― mark cl, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
also 'crazy' is a good song for sure and i always enjoy hearing it but it's basically a fucking moby song
― mark cl, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:20 (fifteen years ago)
I never really understood the love behind "All My Friends."
― Mordy, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
200-1
2000 252001 182002 292003 262004 182005 272006 212007 222008 112009 3
― abanana, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
usually tho i think the top 10 are the most boring in any of their lists. maybe just b/c i'm overexposed (B.O.B. in this case)
I'm underexposed to this song, tho I have the album. After seeing it listed as No. 1 this morning, I went back to give it a more careful listen and . . . meh. I always love that one guy's fast, articulate delivery (Big Boi, I'd guess?), but beyond his delivery and the beat, which is pretty standard-sounding to me, the song doesn't leave much of an impression. (OTOH, I'm a "lyrics guy," and I've been impressed by OutKast's lyrics before, but I haven't focused on the B.O.B. lyrics yet).
Overall, very good list.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
the song doesn't leave much of an impression.
Do you dance?
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Uh guys you do realize that an ILM poll would come up with more or less the same songs, right?― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, August 21, 2009 7:36 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, August 21, 2009 7:36 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
SOTM
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
Which, to be clear, I don't mean you need to dance to it to understand it, but I do feel like the times I've been most in love with the song have been at weddings or house parties or whatever where people are going crazy for it.
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
the beat for B.O.B is not pretty standard-sounding
― just sayin, Friday, 21 August 2009 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
Well, maybe I'm missing something in it. What about the beat do you think is exceptional?
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
well i cant think of any rap songs that have a similar beat?
― just sayin, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:19 (fifteen years ago)
it's just the 'Numbers' beat sped up as on countless booty bass tracks but that's hardly a bad thing
― unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
One of the first ILM threads ever:Bombs Over Baghdad
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
There may have been some kind of 3 song cap for artists, because I figured "Yeah" was a lock and I'm sure people voted for it..
Although I'm almost positive I 4 each from Jay-Z and Kanye..
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
Although I'm almost positive I saw 4 each from Jay-Z and Kanye..
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
There should be a thread for the best songs that didn't make it..
― billstevejim, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
Jay's on there 4 times as the main artist, and 6 more times as a featured artist. I don't think any quota or cap kept "Yeah" from being higher.
― some dude, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
There is no such thing as a 54 mph speed limit, Jay-Z...
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
that lyric is what's known as a "joke"
― some dude, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
I haven't for a looooong time.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
Ah yes, a "joke." I see.
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
true story, the street my mom lives on has an "18 mph" sign. it's yellow and painted on a wooden post and i guess was put there by some neighborhood association, though.
― some dude, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
Thats hilarious! I feel like I remember seeing 27 mph signs somewhere in Florida a few years ago.
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah let's make a best songs that didn't make it thread, can't wait to see people lament the dearth of their favorite iron & wine and black dice "singles"
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Friday, 21 August 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
Uhhhhh . . . not to do a complete pivot on this, but -- listening to it via the embedded LaLa player at the Pitchfork site -- I'm sort of having an epiphany about B.O.B.. Not sure why it's connecting with me so much more now than when I downloaded it from eMusic. It is on the Stankonia disc, right? I actually wondered if what I had on that disc was the same song. I'm still not sure the beat is unique (I hear some jungle-ish influence, but I'm not very good at distinguishing between dance subgenres), but it seems a lot more dynamic and compelling to me now.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
Did this song chart in the U.S.?
I wonder how silly a list like this would look coming from AP magazine.
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
I can't believe ppl are saying that beat isn't unique. Maybe if the only rap you've ever heard is the Blade 2 soundtrack
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
Do you think because your perception of it is a bit higher simply because it made #1 on a list like this one? Like how people will think a certain wine is better merely because they saw a very high score associated with it.
― Evan, Friday, 21 August 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)
I considered that, but no.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
Because my initial reaction to seeing it No. 1 and listening to it was . . . meh. I also considered whether the responses on this thread to my comment changed my mind. I don't think they did, either. They did give me some things to think about/listen for in the song. But that wasn't it, either. To be fair, tho, I'm not sure what it was.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 August 2009 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
that beat is unusual for a hip hop track, but I wouldn't really call it "unique". it just seems *fast*. I was surprised when this song topped the 2000-2004 list, and more surprised now. Was there some kind of underground zeitgeist represented by this song I wasn't aware of? Especially considering it wasn't a big hit, and that it didnt spawn some kind of fast-rap genre or something, I don't get how it's topped these lists. It's a good Outkast song, but I like all the others on the list better.
― Dominique, Friday, 21 August 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
In 2001, I thought all those things would happen
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 16:05 (fifteen years ago)
the direction i thought they would go, though I never woulda picked the song itself if you get me
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure the "55 in the 54" line is to point out the ridiculousness of a trumped up DWB
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
well yeah -- but it's also a joke. he could've said "56 in a 55" instead.
― batch-posting microscope-toting joyless rock critic motherfucker (some dude), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
incidentally B.O.B. is about the same tempo (pulse-wise) as 'crank dat' and a lot of current-ish rap beats, it's just really rare to hear a rap tune with a heavy double-time beat like that (instead of, you know, a slower-feeling beat with some double-time vocals).
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
yeah it's ironic that BOB remains on top because the most popular rap stuff this decade has been pretty much exactly half the bpm
― unban dictionary (blueski), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
sent this tweet in responce to someone else wondering what the big deal is about "B.O.B.":
always been a fan of the "let's take every idea we have & cram it into 5 mins" school; "B.O.B." does it with 80 things I'm predisposed to
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
otm
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
i agree w/ that but at the same time i always felt like BOB goes on a little too long -- it's so exciting for the first few minuntes and then the last minute or so i'm just like OK, let's get to the end already, all the good parts are over
― batch-posting microscope-toting joyless rock critic motherfucker (some dude), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
i agree w/that.
― call all destroyer, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
the last minute is the best part! POWER! MUSIC! ELECTRIC REVIVAL! that rubber synth bass that comes in, too
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
otm again
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
song gets me more hype when I'm just sitting around remembering it or have it stuck in my head than if it's actually on.
― some dude, Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:49 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark
this is how i feel about "b.o.b"
― can i ox (J0rdan S.), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
or when it's playing at a party and everyone simultaneously does the na nah na nah part.
― Moreno, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
er... one-nine-nine-nine. either way.
― Moreno, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
i still want a subgenre built around b.o.b.
― da croupier, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
it's not too late
― da croupier, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
electric revival powermusic
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 August 2009 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
B.O.B. is maybe my fourth favorite song on Stankonia. Maybe.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
this song is not really that long btw
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
"Humble Mumble" should have been a single.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 August 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
wow, if i've heard 'speedballin' before, i don't remember it
― Ømår Littel (Jordan), Friday, 21 August 2009 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, August 21, 2009 6:39 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
the funny thing is 'bonnie & clyde 03' also makes more sense w/r/t all that stuff about beyonce he talks about in his blurb too
not that i think its a better song (altho the summerheadz house remix is awesome)
― butthurt (deej), Friday, 21 August 2009 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
haha the whole Tomb Raider s/t is good, totally forgot that one
― Matos W.K., Friday, 21 August 2009 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
uh thanks?
― jaymc, Friday, 21 August 2009 23:25 (fifteen years ago)
That's just freaky man
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Friday, 21 August 2009 23:26 (fifteen years ago)
oh come on
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Friday, 21 August 2009 23:30 (fifteen years ago)
crepe
― im a square wave and this is my hetero life partner jim jonsin (The Reverend), Friday, 21 August 2009 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
gawddddd I thought ilm ws bad but reading non-ilm message boards on this list is giving me a fkn massive headache
― cozwn (webinar), Saturday, 22 August 2009 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
HUG ME ILX
― cozwn (webinar), Saturday, 22 August 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
glad to see tom e is still fucking pimp w.a pen, his ignition remix write up was spot on
― cozwn, Saturday, 22 August 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Is there a list of them all in one spot yet? Or a way to check if a song's on the list without clicking through 30 pages?
― claws of jungle red (Stevie D), Saturday, 22 August 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
Stevie, the list is here.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 22 August 2009 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
Wow @ no Out Hud or YYY's "Zero"
― claws of jungle red (Stevie D), Saturday, 22 August 2009 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
136/500! I have impressed myself.
― claws of jungle red (Stevie D), Saturday, 22 August 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
143/500 actually
― claws of jungle red (Stevie D), Saturday, 22 August 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
131/500 that I was sure of.
Relatively sure I had heard a few of the others, but not sure enough to click the button.
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Saturday, 22 August 2009 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
there's a torrent of the top 200 on piratebay
― abanana, Saturday, 22 August 2009 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
Possibly the worst song in the list:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcHjAUhtSrk
― abanana, Saturday, 22 August 2009 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
RONG
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 22 August 2009 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
rite
― iatee, Saturday, 22 August 2009 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
another strong contenderhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXAKOfk7_ho
Life's not a bitch! Life is a beautiful womanYou only call her a bitch because she won't let you get that pussy.
― abanana, Saturday, 22 August 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
How the hell did Rachel Stevens get in there? I mean, Some Girls was great but I never expected it to place on a Pitchfork list, even one with Tom E voting in it.
― Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Saturday, 22 August 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
LOVE that Joanna Newsom song
― & they talked about "fucking a behive", literally, 4 times (Whitey on the Moon), Saturday, 22 August 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
sometimes when you're bored or in a bad mood, reading stereogum comments can make your day:
Yeah, their list is pretty good if you like mainstream rap and hip hop. Nice to know our "indie" media outlets have sold out and become so mainstream. Yet, their attitude about any rock, mainstream or indie, is still completely pretentious and cutthroat. Wake up you fucking idiots! You are letting rock music die! Or, at least judge rap on the same cutthroat, pretentious level. Seriously, Rhianna's "Umbrella" in the top 100? This list is a fucking joke.Posted by: steve in reply to zik's comment at 08/22/09 11:52 AM | ReplyScore = 0
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
Fair play on a lot of the choices....but really what is the motivation for smattering utter crap throughout the list like sweaty sewage drips on a perfectly clean sanitized toilet....i mean r.kelly, beyonce, rachael stevens, madonna....who are they trying to appeal to cos the people who buy those records certainly dont give a shit about pitchfork lists.....idiotsPosted by: Andy Pants at 08/21/09 6:56 PM | ReplyScore = -1
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
I give a shit Andy :(
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
Kelly Clarkson usually sets these people off more than anything.
― President Keyes, Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
Kelly Clarkson Brown skin usually sets these people off more than anything.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
last one, i swear
There's not a single Radiohead song in their catalog that is worse than any single song Beyonce has been associated with. Automatically.Just like the Grammies and the Oscars and a whole host of listers/award givers, though, P4K fears irrelevance not giving huge nods to the popular. Recognize that in this segmented age, we all heard Crazy in Love and found it catchy. Recognize that it was not the idiotic drivel of the Black Eyed Peas. But don't put it over legitimate artists, such as Radiohead, artist of the decade for the 90s and 00s. I like that P4K recognizes the undeniable like Cry Me a River from pop. It would have just worked better as a side-bar to the larger list to avoid the uncomfortable reality of putting Beyonce over Iron and Wine, Belle and Sebastian, Madlib, Madvillain, and really a tonne of artists. Say what you want about her, but Beyonce's a star, not an artist.Their write up on her gives her way too much credit. I read it with Alicia Keys in mind instead and it made much more sense.Posted by: Johnny Tuttle at 08/22/09 8:11 AM | ReplyScore = 0
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
There's not a single Radiohead song in their catalog that is worse than any single song Beyonce has been associated with. Automatically.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq-nPgOaO48
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
haha i think lex has stopped opening this thread but i want to see his face if he reads thathttp://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Rs53-MPsJaI/R6UjmF0BG7I/AAAAAAAAE_U/sqZpIyWcOgE/s400/Shocked_Kidz_at_pc_sm.jpg
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sorry, but who is Annie, and why do we care about her song Heartbeat?
I have never heard, nor heard of, this song until today. When was it popular? Who was it popular with? Is it that great?Posted by: jakobibryant profile link at 08/22/09 1:20 PM | ReplyScore = -1
― President Keyes, Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
didn't know tuomas posted to stereogum!
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
2009 list is all indie rock, decade list is almost all hip hop. Identity crisis exposed!Posted by: DK at 08/22/09 4:19 PM | ReplyScore = 0
^^^t bomb alert!! though i dunno if this guy knows why
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
I know lots of people like that, and most of you do too, I'd wager My brother, bless his P4k-ed heart, shows my last.fm page to his friends for lols. He tells me that I have the most embarrassing taste of anyone he knows. That's probably true, but it shouldn't be simply because I listen to mainstream r&b and country.
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
Say what you want about her, but Beyonce's a star, not an artist.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
Beyonce's not even a natural born citizen.
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
She likes them boys up top from the BK iirc
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Saturday, 22 August 2009 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
Wtf, no early Incubus?Posted by: greg3ert at 08/21/09 11:23 PM | ReplyScore = -1
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Saturday, 22 August 2009 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
the top albums better have more tvotr .. anyhow.. like it makes a difference what pitchfork thinks.. but some how they justify my opinions. but they are like a footnote in musicPosted by: Jay profile link at 08/22/09 3:02 PM | ReplyScore = -2 Vote up Vote downJay
baaaaa.Posted by: Jay profile link at 08/22/09 3:05 PM | ReplyScore = -2
― Reading his posts is like watching The Ring (kshighway), Saturday, 22 August 2009 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
ur doin it rong
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Saturday, 22 August 2009 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
I am familiar with 211 out of 500 songs for a score of 42.20% cool.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 01:52 (fifteen years ago)
If I only listened to songs by or featuring T.I., I would be 43.50% cool.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 01:54 (fifteen years ago)
In a weird way it does kinda matter what pitchfork thinks since it's the most popular music review website and more than a few brainless people probably use it often for recommendations without searching for an alternative.
― billstevejim, Sunday, 23 August 2009 02:28 (fifteen years ago)
Skinny Love at 179 is a travesty.Posted by: bob cajun at 08/22/09 6:00 PM | ReplyScore = 0
Oh yes. It's at least 322 places too high on the list...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Sunday, 23 August 2009 02:49 (fifteen years ago)
burn!!!!!!!!!!
― in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Sunday, 23 August 2009 02:58 (fifteen years ago)
the bon iver record is very nice but skinny love is a bizarre choice for 'best song' by so many publications
― Jamie_ATP, Sunday, 23 August 2009 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
It also placed in the top half of our 2004 list. If "Sweet Dreams" or "I Said Never Again" didn't place the year before and after, they came very close.
― scottpl, Sunday, 23 August 2009 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
not quite sure what is so brainless about that. if they're satisfied with music they've found through pitchfork and haven't felt the need to seek out an alternative well what's wrong with that? i agree that they make a sizable impact on the music industry though, at the hmv in montreal they fill two entire walls every time something gets best new music'd.
― samosa gibreel, Sunday, 23 August 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
I hadn't looked at this list yet so I just went to the site and opened a few of them in browser windows. First one I looked at had Kelly Clarkson in it.
Fuck it, I'm not reading any of this shit.
― Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 23 August 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
It makes me think of all the movie reviewers that talk about how Michael Bay's movies are actually concept art rather than dumbed-down mainstream crap.
― Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
Well, I agree that Since You Been Gone is overrated. It is a good song, tho. And the P2k song list is good, too. Lots of new stuff I somehow overlooked (which is, to me, usually the best part of these lists).
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:41 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, their list is pretty good if you like mainstream rap and hip hop. Nice to know our "indie" media outlets have sold out and become so mainstream. Yet, their attitude about any rock, mainstream or indie, is still completely pretentious and cutthroat. Wake up you fucking idiots! You are letting rock music die! Or, at least judge rap on the same cutthroat, pretentious level. Seriously, Kelly Clarkson's "Since U Been Gone" in the top 100? This list is a fucking joke.
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
Pretentious AND cutthroat! Who woulda thunk it?
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:44 (fifteen years ago)
Euler, what do you mean that Pitchfork's "attitude about any rock, mainstream or indie, is still completely pretentious and cutthroat"? What egregious omissions or inclusions are you referring to?
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
Euler's post is copy and pasted from stereogum, who i'm sure you're familiar with. If not, suffice it to say they have the dumbest/worst readership/commentors on the internet. I can't tell if adam's post is c&p'd from there too or just belongs there
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago)
Oh. I stopped reading Stereogum about a year ago.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
Not necessarily a reflection on the blog. Just too much to read/do and not enough time to devote.
Plus, blogs are so 2006.
Hmm..."who I'm sure you're familiar with" seemed to come off unnecessarily condescending. Not what I meant at all; I used to read it back in the day too, now just mostly for the comments. Sry about that
― ash ra - i love temple (k3vin k.), Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
just clowning around, Daniel, sorry!
― afternoon "delight" (Euler), Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:57 (fifteen years ago)
No worries! I'm going to read the Stereogum comments now. They sound interesting. BRB.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
Stereogum is such a piece of shit.
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
You know your list is fucked up when OutKast and LCD Soundsystem claim two spots in the top 20 songs of the decade. Reading Pitchfork has become like hate-sex._______________________________________we ARE talking about Pitchfork here. They don't like post-rock, it's too brainy for them. Though, they did include EiTS's First Breath After Coma and GY!BE's Storm_______________________________________You are exactly right. But, they have to make sure they are "hip", like every other fucking loser commenting on how good this list is. It is acceptably cool to like mainstream rap and hip hop right now in indie circles, so hence, no country and a top 20 that looks like it could have came from Vibe magazine._______________________________________This list is shit. Pitchfork, you are officially dead to me!
_______________________________________
we ARE talking about Pitchfork here. They don't like post-rock, it's too brainy for them. Though, they did include EiTS's First Breath After Coma and GY!BE's Storm
You are exactly right. But, they have to make sure they are "hip", like every other fucking loser commenting on how good this list is. It is acceptably cool to like mainstream rap and hip hop right now in indie circles, so hence, no country and a top 20 that looks like it could have came from Vibe magazine.
This list is shit. Pitchfork, you are officially dead to me!
Gold.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
a+
― salvador dollywood (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 23 August 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
honestly, how could you ignore the entire BRIGHT EYES phenomena that occurred early to mid decade?
It hasn't been easy, trust me.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
The Bright Eyes phenomenon, yes. Overpowering.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 August 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
Reading Pitchfork has become like hate-sex.
Delete life.
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
fuck missy elliot and that shit songPosted by: d@ve at 08/22/09 6:26 PM | ReplyScore = -1
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
pitchfork is nothing more than online journalism, as evidenced by the quality of its writers, its pervasive amount of lists and the choices that go into those lists. it should never claim to be more than that.Posted by: mork at 08/22/09 5:32 PM | ReplyScore = 0
p4k = online journalism!!
These people can barely write.
how can anyone take this list seriously? jimmy eat world's "the middle" in the top 200 and only one pipettes song made the cut?!?!?!?!?!?!
the biggest crime, however, was the complete lack of songs from zwan.
― Bastards of Young Dro, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
Tegan and Sara, Metric, The Kills, Holly Miranda, The Jealous Girlfriends, Lykke Li, Alexisonfire, City and Colour, La Roux??Where's all this good music?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
No Zwan, no credibility. Honestly.
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
what's the 'online journalism' guy even trying to say?
― Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently "online journalism" is a pejorative! All online publications have bad writing and pointless lists!
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway it's gonna be okay i swear
everytime i click the "see all messages" thing i end up staying on this thread just so i can hear the will smith song to the end.
― cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
I hope so, Matt. I hope so.
― kshighway, Sunday, 23 August 2009 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
Haven't read it yet, but Eric Harvey's piece, "The Social History of the MP3," is up.
http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7689-the-social-history-of-the-mp3/
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
And here's one last Stereogum comment on the P2k tracks list:
I'm sorry. This list is ridiculous. And as someone that was actually reading Pitchfork waaaay back in 1996, I think their "we're-gonna-have-it-both-ways-just-to-show-you-we're-NOT-elitists" crap is sadly transparent.... Does anyone REALLY think the almost entirely image-driven R&B / hip-pop of this decade DESERVES the amount of mannered scrutiny and exaltation they give it??? Alongside the truly brilliant and moving music that's been made this decade?? A far more interesting list would've been the couple-hundred songs that will still matter 10 years from now.......Posted by: Jason at 08/23/09 10:42 PM | ReplyScore = 0
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
It's true, that song is bewitching.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
I just finished reading Harvey's piece, and it blew me away. So, so good.
Quotes that stood out.
The insane:
By 2003, things had risen to the level that Orrin Hatch was grilling technology firms at Senate Judiciary Committee hearings about the possibility of "warning" copyright infringers, and then-- I'm not making this up-- destroying their computers. "If that's the only way," Hatch said, "then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize the seriousness of their actions."
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
So I'm not sad that print magazines, or newspapers, are dying; I'm sad that music criticism and journalism are endangered. I'm sad that publishers, advertisers, and corporate owners have lagged behind so incredibly long, holding onto an outdated critical model out of blind faith, leaving so many talented writers in the lurch. People expressing their musical taste to an eager audience in the offtime of their day jobs is one thing, and by all accounts a very good thing. But alongside these folks, we desperately need people to get paid to listen, discuss, contextualize, and critique music on a full-time basis. Until someone figures out how to make this work, a music culture will continue to take a significant hit. Print is dead: long live criticism.
He doesn't really make an argument as to WHY we need paid critics. WHY isn't it good enough that people are writing "in the offtime of their day jobs"? I agree with him affectively--it *feels* like people should be paid to be fulltime critics. But I don't see who is going to be paying them going forward.
Maybe that's his point.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Glad the "Stereogum comments are dumb" derailment is over.
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 24 August 2009 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
WHY isn't it good enough that people are writing "in the offtime of their day jobs"?
Presumably because these people, while they may have good taste or be able to write decently, don't always have the practice, experience, and knowledge that full-time music critics do as a matter of course.
― jaymc, Monday, 24 August 2009 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, August 24, 2009 9:49 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
seriously, shit is not that hilarious
― some dude, Monday, 24 August 2009 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
xp That's a big generalization, of course (there are plenty of full-time critics who are idiots), but I think that's what he's getting at.
― jaymc, Monday, 24 August 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I think you're right jaymc.
Still. . . Harvey himself isn't a fulltime critic, yet he still does really good work. Perhaps that is true despite the limitations imposed by his not being a fulltime critic, but I'm not sure that's true.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
On Twitter, N4te P4tr1n linked to a great blog post by T0m Ew1ng, in which T0m writes:
The way Pitchfork, and I think most music sites/publications/sections work, is that when they identify a blindspot they look for someone who knows their stuff to write about it. Pitchfork in particular is actually very good at this: as I understand it, the reason it now employs writers who know about dance music, and pop, and hip-hop, and Afro-pop, and metal is that it used to get people going “WTF Pitchfork you know nothing about this stuff and it’s awesome”, and it said “OK, come and tell us about it.”
The whole (short) blog post is worth reading.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 15:41 (fifteen years ago)
For whatever it's worth, Harvey is a grad student in Indiana University's Department of Communication and Culture, so it's not like he's a computer programmer blogging about Animal Collective on his lunch break.
― jaymc, Monday, 24 August 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
Oh I know! I was just saying that he's not a fulltime *music critic*.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
There's a lot of smart people who fall somewhere in between fulltime music critic and "computer programmer blogging about Animal Collective on his lunch break."
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
this is my last post on ILX for a while, guys.
― patti lmaonnaise (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 24 August 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
Seriously?
Why?
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
miss u boo
― Merzbox and whale songs (The Reverend), Monday, 24 August 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
(Sorry if that's an inside-joke I'm missing, WW. Haven't been able to keep up with the thread this morning. If you're serious, and because of time commitments, take care and come back. Otherwise, I hope you reconsider and stick around.)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
(and it's because of . . . )
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
fuck that essay is long.
― samosa gibreel, Monday, 24 August 2009 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
One would think the editors of a decent music publication would identify said "gaps" ahead of time, rather than wait for the world to laugh so loudly at their befuddlement that they're shamed into course-correction.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Monday, 24 August 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
0tt, you really need to get over wasting so much of your time mindlessly hating on P4k.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
Who doesn't remember the scathing UNESCO report, subsequent mass protests in Eastern Europe, and secret meeting between the Pope and Brent D that finally forced the site to cover Missy Elliott?
― Isabella Cup (nabisco), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
is mindlessly defending and championing P4k a more fulfilling way to spend so much of your time, brah? (xpost)
― you just geek'd up our director of D4Ls (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
sure if you totally ignore the way the site (and most things btw) actually evolved over time.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
Sh1pley, I figured someone was going to throw that one at me, but I didn't wait several months to log in just to post a mindless attack on P4k.
Here are some non-P4k threads I started recently:
Best Music Criticism of the 2000sThe Death of the Record CollectionMaintaining a Digital Music Collection
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
i'm just saying, you spend a lot of time laboring in the defense of something that imo doesn't need defending -- it's like if everytime made a disparaging comment about message boards or posting anonymously on the internet, you tried to truthbomb everyone with the fact that omg, we are all anonymously posting on an internet message board!!
― you just geek'd up our director of D4Ls (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
Good point, and well said. I'll try to focus my energy here on other things from now on.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
i suggest finding threads about silly CNN/Fox News bloopers and being all "you fools!!! where would we be without 24 hour news networks?! dead in a hole, I say!!!!"
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
Or leap to the defense of Sean Hannity on the "Worst FOX commentator" thread. Hannity is repeatedly maligned on this forum, and needs a good defender.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
Or some other good example of a medium or media outlet with lots of good and bad points instead of one very divisive individual.
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
I wasn't being snarky. You're right, and I'm going to focus on other things from here on out than P4k-defending.
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
Seriously, I like Pitchfork, too. No reason not to defend it (at least from time-to-time).
The best-songs list has exposed me to a lot of stuff I hadn't focused on before, much of which I like. OutKast's stuff prior to Speakerboxxx/The Love Below is a good example (I realize I'm way behind the curve on appreciating OutKast). Anyway, for stuff like that, I'm thankful for P2k's list.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 24 August 2009 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
thank god kshighway will now be devoting more time to threads about mp3s & records
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
I know you weren't being snarky. If I had to wait for you to be snarky before I was snarky I'd never get anything done! xpost
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway, you need some juju hounds in your life
― cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
Should I just post in threads on individual records I'm into? Would focusing on music instead of music publications and over-generalized topics such as The-State-of-X make people dislike me less?
Short of quitting the board, what can I do to stop everyone from continually calling me out for what I'm guessing are hopefully just rookie mistakes naive young posters make?
― kshighway, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
post to my nels cline thread!
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
Should I just post in threads on individual records I'm into?
You can post in other places, but yes. Moar music plz.
― Mordy, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw i don't dislike you or think you're a sockpuppet and i hope none of my ribbing as of late has given you the imrpession that i do -- xpost
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway i don't think ppl dislike you or whatever, at least i don't.
― cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway: stop caring about rookie mistakes and carry on doing whatever the hell you want to. all clusterfuck threads have easy targets, just take it as a stupid hazing.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway is my favorite newbie
― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
It's very easy to see why kshighway would get the impression that he was disliked, though; perhaps maybe ppl could take that into consideration a little more when furiously banging out zings...?
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
It's very easy to see why dan should know better than to use phrases like "furiously banging out zings"
― B@t Ma$ters0n (some dude), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
for once I didn't abuse my mod power to make myself look smarter
― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, i don't think that just because ppl are disagreeing with you or what you are saying or the position you are taking means they dislike you. This board is all about the clusterfuck and "you like [X] so you are racist" and vicious assaults on character over definitions of genres that are only used by board members, so like, don't take no advice on your posting style, just don't worry too hard either.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
hi, kshighway: I am inclined to totally appreciate your posting style and find it kind of a breath of fresh air, so here is my advice. don't start being cynical and sneery and in-the-know and only posting snarky one-liners that nobody can call you out on: it'd solve your problem but be kind of depressing. do learn to do this thing I'm bad at where you don't sweat being misunderstood or goofed on, so you can just say stuff reasonably and then let it lie, without feeling driven to clarify yourself or follow up too far on things.
you are mostly just getting ribbed on here because there are certain things this circle has gotten really wary and cynical and jaded about (like the fact that there are totally normal and reasonable people who really like popular indie acts) and it's unusual to see people here who aren't conscious of certain stuff surrounding that -- you will, over time, become conscious of that stuff and savvy about other people's assumptions, hopefully without becoing wary or jaded or cynical yourself; godspeed
― nabisco, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
wait for it...
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
Nabisco OTM
(had to be said)
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
also what they all said about people just being zingy and stuff -- umm I think sometimes a lot of zinging here is based on people being conscious/aware of the same assumptions and perspectives, which can probably be frustrating if you come in without sharing or being aware of those
― nabisco, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
nabisco gave the best advice but really do considering talking more about music and talking less about talking about music--don't know abt anyone else but the only thing i know you like for sure is wilco.
this is a great place to discover and talk about music a lot of the time.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, August 24, 2009 8:51 PM (1 hour ago)
― Cunga, Monday, 24 August 2009 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
"One would think the editors of a decent music publication would identify said "gaps" ahead of time, rather than wait for the world to laugh so loudly at their befuddlement that they're shamed into course-correction."
(leaving aside that this is coming from Ott of all people) I don't know if there are any music publications that don't have certain critical gaps and blinders. It's the flipside to having a recognisable identity that draws readers to you in the first place.
At any rate I tend to think of Pitchfork's evolution in pre-ScottPl and post-ScottPl terms.
― Tim F, Monday, 24 August 2009 23:11 (fifteen years ago)
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/5488/33vm8lh.gif
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 00:25 (fifteen years ago)
Meaning before I hired him, and after. Gotcha.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:04 (fifteen years ago)
you and nick sylvester need a slam book
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:05 (fifteen years ago)
and until you become aware of those assumptions and perspectives, do not post about your sex life ...could be a good idea not to do so even after such awareness sets in.
― what happened? i am confused. (sarahel), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:09 (fifteen years ago)
Rob, I make more than twice your annual income, and am far and away held in higher regard as a writer/author.
― butthurt (deej), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:18 (fifteen years ago)
looooooool that's like the saddest thing i've ever seen.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, poor low paid unrespected Rob Mitchum
― some dude, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, doesn't Rob Mitchum have like a doctorate in microbiology or something?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:53 (fifteen years ago)
maybe if he hadn't wasted so much time on that people would care about him as a writer/author
― some dude, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 02:56 (fifteen years ago)
some dude: I'm going to go post to the Nels Cline thread now!
nabisco: As usual, beautifully put, and extremely helpful. I'll try not to lapse into cynicism/excessive zinging, and I'll try not to explain myself too much here or apologize of loving indie rock. Also, thanks for the stuff you said regarding "other people's assumptions" and my (hopefully) eventually coming to understand where more veteran posters are coming from. And thank you for taking the time to say all of that; I really, really appreciate it.
― kshighway, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:09 (fifteen years ago)
*for loving
― kshighway, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:18 (fifteen years ago)
got bored enough to do this, only counted songs that I can think of how they go, which excludes a couple tracks from albums I like but could never really tell one song from the next:
You are familiar with 176 out of 500 songs for a score of 35.20% cool
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:10 (fifteen years ago)
o_0 at that Hipinion board. Briefly trying to GOOGLE the backstory explaining that poster's (an ex-P2k writer) problem with Pitchfork was fruitless, but it did lead me to this odd entry about the Pitchfork site from "Encyclopedia Dramatica," whatever that is. I also spotted this Stereogum post, which just confused me.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
wtf http://addictivethoughts.com/2009/04/14/for-posteritys-sake-the-infamous-ryan-sjohn-coltrane-pitchfork-review/
― Mordy, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:08 (fifteen years ago)
haha I was reading that too
― sylvia plathter cathter (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
Shit, cat.
― sylvia plathter cathter (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
speaking of vanished embarassing late-90s p4k reviews, Mordy and I had to dig up this one last night:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040421093112/www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/b/basement-jaxx/remedy.shtml
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 07:58 (fifteen years ago)
That old Pitchfork layout is headache-inducing. Hilarious review, tho. That was scrubbed from the site? I figured the scrubbing of the Coletrane review was an isolated incident. I wish there was a searchable database of "disappeared" Pitchfork reviews.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:12 (fifteen years ago)
The Rooty one was awful also.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:38 (fifteen years ago)
The Rooty one was decently written, just massively rong, which is much more than can be said for the one above.
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:42 (fifteen years ago)
lol this is how they put it. "cool."
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:50 (fifteen years ago)
i am glad that the opportunity to use that gif arose so soon, anyway.
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
L-R: myself, lex
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:52 (fifteen years ago)
That Coltrane review offends me not so much for the bad attempt at jazz slang as much as it does for the missing semi-colons that would have made large chunks of it easier to read.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
A couple of their late nineties Pet Shop Boys reviews made me cry.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
I remember reading that Basement Jaxx review when it came out; between that and Brent's Kid A review I soon decided to stop actively reading Pitchfork. (Then a whole bunch of ppl I knew started writing for them, bastards.)
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
off topic but why do all your display names include genitals in them now?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Dan's attending some extraordinary parties.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha
Because those are the quotes I run across on Mondays that I find the funniest
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
"Well, what about Oakenfold or Sasha and Digweed?"
"Doesn't count. They're some of the most revered DJs in England-- not because they create house music, but because they scrounge and dig deep to find the really good stuff. It'll be a sad day for dance music when they play Basement Jaxx."
I'm speechless.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
I remember reading that Basement Jaxx review when it came out; between that and Brent's Kid A review I soon decided to stop actively reading Pitchfork
^^^this
― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
It's weird to be reminded how when Pitchfork started there was this idea that internet music journalism could take whatever form it liked, and then after a string of disastrous misfires like this it returned to a more traditional album review format, albeit longer and less regimented than the magazines. I got the same feeling reading some old Paul Morley reviews from the early 80s NME - the idea of doing something different was admirable but the result was usually hopelessly pretentious, opaque and alienating - his experimental reviews have dated so badly, although not as badly as "Shit, cat."
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
that 50 cent gif is blowing my mind
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 25 August 2009 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
i totally miss the wacky p4k reviews.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
The Jet review with the monkey was the best eg of an off-the-wall review. Quick, somebody find an album that sounds like that 50 Cent gif.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ojLosm2HyZg/SnXblk3HuFI/AAAAAAAAAOQ/6V6NRVytgS0/s400/slaughterhouse-cover-500x500.jpg
Slaughterhouse: Slaughterhouse4.5
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
Good God, what a shitty list. I just did a ⌘f for B.O.B. to see what people had to say, and frankly I'm disillusioned with your lack of outrage. Actually, extend that to the whole world. I hadn't known about B.O.B.'s high placement on the previous lists, so I didn't have that to prepare me. In fact, finding out about all this at once has just added to the shell shock, and a growing dread that I've gone insane. And now on top of all that, B.O.B. is stuck in my head after me listening to it five times in a row to make sure I wasn't missing anything. Not that it's just B.O.B. mind you. The whole list is shitty. I just am singling out B.O.B. right now because I have yet to peruse everyone's comments on the other 499. I'm afraid if I don't see more dissent in those comments, I'm going to have to check myself in.
― jesse, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 00:30 (fifteen years ago)
OMG STFU WILL SMITH
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
Nine years ago today:
Bombs Over Baghdad
― Mark, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 01:12 (fifteen years ago)
Haha jesse
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
jesse tell us more about music you don't like.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 02:56 (fifteen years ago)
i also said this earlier but their 2007 2008 and 2009 choices are what kills this list for me.. specifically the 2009 choices are so random and seem like they were only included because they needed music from 2009.. theres way better stuff going on right nwo than most of these..
357 Japandroids – Young Hearts Spark Fire (this is the only 2009 choice that should be HIGHER)500 The Big Pink - Velvet (this is actually really good)228 Phoenix – 1901 (228 is about right, lisztomania is better)475 Kid Cudi vs. Crookers – Day ‘N Night (remix) (475 is about right)9 Animal Collective - My Girls (i'm not sure why this is considered the album's best song... i'm clearly missing something)115 Dirty Projectors – Stillness Is The Move (this is ok but should be closer to 400)206 Bat For Lashes – Daniel (this is fine i guess.. but not for 206)374 The Pains Of Being Pure At Heart – Young Adult Friction (they have way better songs)401 The Walkmen – In The New Year (they have way better songs)345 Antony & The Johnsons – Aeon (mixed feelings.. vox are difficult to get used to.. but i get why people enjoy it)372 Camera Obscura – French Navy (this isn't really different from their other songs)162 Grizzly Bear – Two Weeks (i dont get whats so great about this band)334 Grizzly Bear – While You Wait For The Others (omg snooze)492 St. Vincent – Strangers (snooze)497 Woods – Rain On (terrible)
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
I sort of agree w/you, but I can't think of what they obv. should have included instead.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:20 (fifteen years ago)
metal
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:25 (fifteen years ago)
"pretty wings"
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:31 (fifteen years ago)
I really like the Grizzly Bear album. I think "Cheeleader" is the best song on it, though. To me, "My Girls" is definitely the stand-out song from MMP, but I agree that it was placed too high for such a recent track. I love "Stillness Is The Move". "Aeon" is nice. I think "1901" is great, and is my favorite track from the album. The others I don't get at all. It seems like one or two of those, at least, could have been replaced by newer stuff like "9x Outta 10" or "Pretty Wings".
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
(haven't heard The Big Pink)
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
There ya go.. "9x Outta 10" would've worked just fine.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
"zero""you belong with me" / "love story"
But yeah it's clear p4k seems to have to wait for some kind of consensus before really repping for rap/pop/rnb traxx
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
"You Belong With Me" and "Love Story" are great. "Fearless" and "Fifteen", too. I'm not sure which of those tracks were released as singles in 2009. Did Pitchfork even review the Taylor Swift album? I guess it's not their kind of thing...
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
I'd love to see T. Finney review Taylor Swift for P4k.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
Was just gonna say.
And yeah iirc "love story" was 08 but it was a bigger hit and a better candidate for this list, though I like "YBWM" better
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
said it earlier, but "Turnin' Me On"
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
I like the first five tracks off that album, with "Turnin' Me On" and "Knock You Down" my favorites. After that it sounds like a lot of filler to me.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
I'm too busy/lazy to actually pitch reviews to pitchfork by and large, so most of the time it's stuff that turns up at their end which they then think I should review.
This is possibly a big contributing factor to why country etc. doesn't get reviewed on the site much: not merely are there few writers who would go out of their way to write about it, but also the record labels probably aren't sending this stuff through for consideration.
I might start a campaign to get "You Belong With Me" into the year end poll though.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 07:14 (fifteen years ago)
Other obvious 2009 track missing, imo: Trap Goin Ham
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 08:02 (fifteen years ago)
^^^
― you might be a goole, but what's a goole to a goblin? (The Reverend), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 08:24 (fifteen years ago)
really true and a big part of why i can't take it seriously outside of its indie rock centre, which i'm not interested in anyway. lol remember when they reviewed new amerykah like 4 months after it came out, presumably because they hadn't considered erykah badu worthy of inclusion prior to that, and then were like: shit! critical consensus! better jump on that!
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
lol as if erykah badu wasn't already critical consensus central.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 12:48 (fifteen years ago)
lol remember when they reviewed new amerykah like 4 months after it came out, presumably because they hadn't considered erykah badu worthy of inclusion prior to that, and then were like: shit! critical consensus! better jump on that!
Still waiting for the inevitable review of Love Vs Money by year's end.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
from a dude who discovered the-dream after his 2nd album dropped ....
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
Don't see why that should matter.
― lou, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
well if your criticizing pitchfork for being johnny come latelys...
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw deej was pulling rank on people who bought dream's first album more than 3 months after it was out, so everybody's an asshole here
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I never understood that either. I first heard "Livin' a Lie" and "Ditch That" on Rich Juzwiak's year-end mix back in January '08. Does that mean I'm qualified to like The-Dream??
― lou, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking of which, I just heard "Sippin' on Some Syrup" for what I believe is the first time, thanks to the Pitchfork list, and it's pretty great. Also now understand what "So Many Shrimp" is a reference to.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
also partly because I was really busy with some personal stuff and took an embarrassingly long time to turn the review around -- but hey, any good LOL-on-P4k theories that help distract from my own flakiness are appreciated and encouraged round here
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
the thing that's been most interesting to me in reactions to this list, actually, is that word "presumably," the guessing at motives (often sinister or cynical) for why things turn out the way they do, which ascribed motives all too rarely run in the direction of "maybe this is the stuff that they, right or wrong, actually think is good" -- this is perfectly natural, since lists are sort of a form of self-presentation and it's probably good to be skeptical about what that self-presentation is doing, but yeesh does it get weird at points. (I guess this thread has gone over some of the indie types who think the list is, e.g., "pretending" to like mega-popular pop singles most everyone likes, just to make indie folks feel uncool or bad about themselves.)
I've developing a whole taxonomy of responses, but for now two of my favorites are these types:
- "ACT X at 279? Are you kidding me? This list is such bullshit." -- absolutely no way to tell if their problem is that they hate Act X or if they think Act X should be number one
- "This is SO idiotic. 'Single by Band X' at #46? I'm never reading this site again. It should have been 'Other, Similar Single by Band X' instead." -- there's lots of this, like "I can't believe these MORONS included bands X, Y, and Z and not these other acts that are, in the grand scheme of things, practically identical substitutes" -- I mean, it's cool that listmaking gets people arguing out interesting stuff like what's the band's best single, but it seems weird to be punching your computer screen and raging about a list for praising stuff you like via a slightly different single or act
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, if you REALLY thought that only an EVIL MORONIC JERK could possibly like 'Someone Great' better than 'North American Scum,' it'd be kinda hard to function socially, right?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
i guess after reading reaction in a few places i'm still amazed that people can sound so mad about this list, since it belies a strong emotional reaction that involves some combination of pitchfork, songs they like, and songs the hate, only no one is saying how much of each is involved.
it never occurred to me to take the list as anything other than a reflection of pitchfork's evolution over the last ten years. beyond that there have been some songs i was reminded to download, some decent writeups to read, and one or two pleasant surprises i had totally missed at the time.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
The extreme reactions are, in generally, really unnecessary, yeah. Still, I think there's a fair amount of justifiable eyebrow-raising, especially in regards to songs, or versions of songs, that seem to be picked kind of arbitrarily to represent a particular artist or album. Like, why the "Get By" remix instead of the original? Does anybody actually think "Don't Feel Right" is one of the two most notable Roots songs of the decade? I'm not suggesting ill intent or conspiracy, but it definitely feels like if there wasn't an editorial hand guiding those choices, there were certainly some weird voting blocs being set up among the staff to get some picks up in the ranking.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:01 (fifteen years ago)
note to self: "generally" or "in general," never both.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
i guess potentially it gives away a lot of people as liking talking about talking about music more than they really like music. see also the explosion in commentary around the meta-presentation of sports at the expense of discussion about games themselves.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think a lot of the songs are the best, and there are a many that surprise me, but i've heard lots of great stuff i never paid attention to before (criminally ignored T.I. save two tracks previous to this, also Bat for Lashes 'Daniel' is amazing, plus some good indie guitar stuff I never bothered with).
so lists are imperfect blah blah blah, but now that I'm about to finish listening to the list on Spotify (well, the 390 available), I think all in all it's an excellent representation of the decade, certainly in regards to trends. Also, having been tired of Jay-Z for a while, it was nice to re-evaluate his stuff. I had forgotten how good he really was.
'Crazy in Love' still boring though.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:03 (fifteen years ago)
my one "serious" criticism of the list is that it never really figures out how to rectify pop singles and indie rock album tracks--they just sort of sit alongside each other not engaging in conversation.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
just to be clear, I'm not picking on responses, even hatey ones, or questions like those about why something winds up there -- those are interesting questions. I just find some of the forms of it funny. (very especially the people who are clearly appalled and outraged by a selection but don't provide enough clues to figure out anything about why! it's amazing how many of those I've seen!)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:05 (fifteen years ago)
How would they "engage in conversation"? Not being snarky; genuinely curious about what you mean.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago)
OTM. I think a lot of the indie stuff were mostly singles, but the inclusion of YHF album tracks and that Arcade Fire song in the top ten are a bit odd. Like they wanted to represent the albums as opposed to working as singles themselves, but surely we'll see an onslaught of indie in the albums list, so I don't know why they're there. Generally good songs though.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno, most of the weirdness in the Pitchfork list happens when you extend the list beyond c. 100 tracks, mostly based I would guess on not enough contributors. You'll get more consensus-y 101-500 if you have a ton of people contributing, but given (1) the staff isn't that huge, (2) the staff has extremely varied (and in some cases specialist) interests, and (3) they're not putting these lists together in separate caves or something, it makes sense that you're going to see what seem to be arbitrary choices based on one or two staffers repping for it once you go past a certain number. (I just think 500 is too high for a "group poll" -- were individual lists published this time?)
― dabug, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Wednesday, August 26, 2009 12:02 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
? i was pulling rank on a dude who discovered the-dream on his sophomore album acting better than pfork for having heard it -- this has nothing to do w your insecurities about being behind on modern R&B
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:12 (fifteen years ago)
Even individual top 10's would be interesting, just as a sort of symbolic gesture; you'd probably see [random album track] really high on an individual's list.
― dabug, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
deej i was referring to something you said to someone else on another thread last year, and the fact that you think it's about my insecurities on being behind says it all!
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
xxxxxxp i'm not really sure--it's like they agree that for the purposes of a "list of tracks" all these beyonce and robyn and jay-z songs are clearly worthy, but then in keeping with the nature of the publication they have to pull out like two songs from yankee hotel foxtrot and have to find one kid a song for the top 10 and stuff like that. but are those things really on equal footing? for albums that had no songs released as singles how did they decide what song(s) should represent?
to add to that there's been a discussion abt pitchfork bringing in genre specialists to provide coverage to certain unenlightened areas and that's probably where a bunch of the rap and dance and techno tracks on this list came from. but they've done the same thing with metal. and obv metal doesn't release singles (most of the time) but it doesn't look like there was an effort to incorporate metal into this list, not in the same way that lots of indie album tracks made it on.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:14 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
no it doesnt -- i just said that because i had no idea what u were talking about
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
if i was it wasnt on some LOL U BEHIND THE CURVE it was more like no one listened to us talking about this record for 12 months until it popped up on a year end list
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Why is it hard to believe that a publication that focuses on indie/indie-friendly music would have among its writers an organic consensus about bands like Radiohead and Wilco?
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
Per some above posts, this list really underlines for me why I always have done singles lists as opposed to songs, if only to make it less redundant from an album list, and to kind of respect singles, as opposed to songs, as their own specific medium. There are a ton of singles I like from albums I don't or haven't heard, but if I every tried to do a list of 'favorite songs' for a given year or decade, it would be chock full of deep cuts from my albums list, because, duh, I like lots of songs from my favorite albums.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
i guess it's not that hard to believe (tho weren't we just talking about amnesiac and a bunch of people had different favorites?) but if that's the case then the choices were arrived at totally differently from the hip-hop and pop portions of the list where they more or less exclusively went with big, well-regarded singles. that's part of what i mean by not in conversation.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:23 (fifteen years ago)
xp yeah exactly, it seems like they're basically splitting the difference on that.
I guess it depends on what music you like and how you consume it, though -- lots of people grab up tracks and remixes and stuff on blogs now that aren't proper 'singles' in any way but aren't on albums. For me the overwhelming majority of the music I like is either on a CD I own, or is something I was exposed to on the radio or a video channel or something.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:24 (fifteen years ago)
the inclusion of YHF album tracks and that Arcade Fire song in the top ten are a bit odd. Like they wanted to represent the albums as opposed to working as singles themselves
Gukbe, can I just register deep disagreement with this? I think that as you come up the list you come across indie stuff that's not just album standouts, but songs that -- if you happened to follow or be immersed in the indie world -- felt like things people really gathered around. (Maybe sort of the modern equivalent of old mix-tape favorites.) That Arcade Fire song is certainly one of those, for me (just for instance): I'm pretty sure it's the only thing from that album I have on my mp3 player right now, because it is -- for reasons having nothing to do with the album -- just a good and memorable song. (To me.) Toward the top of the list I get that vibe from a lot of picks, songs that stuck out as particularly meaningful to a certain audience; the stuff that if 00s indie was graduating from high school would get played over the slide shows of its good times.
Which is what's more interesting to me about them, actually, partly in terms of the pop stuff and partly just in terms of what people look to indie bands for -- a lot of the songs that develop this consensus as meaningful standouts have these grand or nostalgic or tender qualities; they're the ballads. Maybe that has to do with indie not having a radio-type environment where pop singles can seem important as anything other than lures to buy the album; maybe it has to do with the pop consensus stuff taking the role here of the upbeat and the exciting. Maybe this is just what indie does and what it gets used for -- I don't know, but it seems like the stuff that washes into the "important" file for indie is the kind of heart-clutching "this is the song that really meant something to me" stuff.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:25 (fifteen years ago)
for albums that had no songs released as singles how did they decide what song(s) should represent?
as for "idioteque", at least, it seems to be the song from that record that's been written about the most in the past decade, and it's probably the biggest crowd-pleaser when they play it live
xp some dude otm
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:25 (fifteen years ago)
Sometimes seeing concensus build up around an album track is really fun, though -- I loved seeing Ted Leo's "Timorous Me" on the Pitchfork list because I love that song was always kind of begrudged Sage for singling it out as the album's worst track in her review 8 years ago.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:26 (fifteen years ago)
i guess it's not that hard to believe (tho weren't we just talking about amnesiac and a bunch of people had different favorites?) but if that's the case then the choices were arrived at totally differently from the hip-hop and pop portions of the list where they more or less exclusively went with big, well-regarded singles. that's part of what i mean by not in conversation
Again, I don't think it's surprising that a publication that started out as indie-centric would generate a decade list where the indie stuff spans the gamut from singles to random album cuts but mostly represents hip-hop and chart pop/rock via singles and indie-approved remixes; it seems like a natural reflection of how their music coverage has changed to me.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:29 (fifteen years ago)
xp to nabs ok but it still means that choices are being made for indie that aren't being made for pop.
experience re: kid a that may be true only for me--when kid a came out ppl rallied around optimistic, essentially because it was guitar-based, had a reasonable length, and a recognizable structure--it sounded the most radiohead of anything on that record. now ppl apparently rally around idiotheque which is the same thing except replace guitars with electronics. are either of these the consensus song from kid a? didn't pitchfork run a review this week about how it's the last album meant to be consumed as such?
and dan i'm not saying it doesn't make sense or is surprising but i am more questioning the validity of it?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:50 (fifteen years ago)
deej and some dude are SPOILING me with radio killllllah beef : )
i inhale it
― the turdlike genius of Jeff Tweete´ (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
wait, could you explain this more? because I don't entirely see the difference. "that fantastic pop single we all loved that summer" versus "that terrific indie tune we all embraced that winter" -- we might get different things out of these categories, but the choices we make about putting them on lists are basically the same, aren't they? either way, it's something that was good and felt broadly significant (whether it was significant in the big pop world or within the smaller indie world).
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:55 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not sure i can define what the difference is between "we all heard the new jay-z single and thought it was great" and "we all bought yankee hotel foxtrot and decided that 'poor places' is one of the best two or three songs on the album" but i think it is something and i think it might be significant.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
one of the songs is a single, one isn't
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:02 (fifteen years ago)
I think you're making an incorrect assumption that people only engage with indie records by buying whole albums and then deciding which songs they like best. That seems flawed to me. It's part of why I mentioned old mix-tape favorites: just because something comes from an "album" sphere doesn't mean people can't still collect around certain tracks in a very track-based way. (And again, I haven't listened to the whole of Funeral in years, but I do really love that Arcade Fire single!)
Trying to find a better example of this. I mean, look, I know some of you might laugh and/or gag at this notion, but if someone is really immersed in the "indie" world, something like "The Past is a Grotesque Animal" may feel every bit as momentous in their sphere as a huge-smash r&b single feels for the larger pop world -- it may be the thing everyone in that space is talking about or marveling at, the thing that happened that year. With that song, it wouldn't be because people studiously decided it was the preferred track on the album, it'd be because the long-ass crazed grim centerpiece of the thing was what seemed significant and important about it, the thing that happened on it.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:06 (fifteen years ago)
Pardon?
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:12 (fifteen years ago)
lol more entertainment for he1go comin up
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
no doubt ppl can listen to indie in a track-based way, but the filter that's getting them there is still different from something like a hip-hop single, where it might be released by the record company well in advance of the album, and then played on the radio and in public places and stuff. there's no need for a critic (anyone from a p4k writer to your friend who tells you about music) to be like "hey this is a track to check out"--it's kind of already been decided that this is the track you WILL check out.
looking more at the indie selections i'm surprised at how many of them actually WERE released as singles! so maybe my argument is a nonstarter. lol i'll just stick to complaining about the lack of metal or something.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
or maybe the problem i'm having doesn't really begin to show itself until you get to the low numbers, like--
24. everything in its right place21. since u been gone
this reminds me of when people make ilm polls that are like pick one: motorhead or whitney houston.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:16 (fifteen years ago)
haha I was gonna ask how yr hip-hop model was at all different from the indie model aside from maybe terminology ("single" vs "EP" and even then there are still a bunch of indie singles)
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
Part of me still has a hard time accepting that indie is more singles-driven than it used to be, even though it clearly is in some ways. I also refuse to believe that "The Empty Page" and "Incinerate" are consensus Sonic Youth songs for the decade the way "Teenage Riot" and "Schizophrenia" would've been for the '80s.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
i was pulling rank on a dude who discovered the-dream on his sophomore album acting better than pfork for having heard it
For the record, I picked up on the first album in mid-2008. I was well into The-Dream by the time the second album dropped; I bought it on its official release day (not much of a downloader), so that's that.
Not acting better than Pfork, either. I understand they don't get around to reviewing everything the moment it's released. Also, even though doubtless some of the site's writers are into the album, it doesn't exactly play to their core readership to review that one.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
let's keep talking about this
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
Regardless of whether there's any intent or agenda that exists or is being projected onto it, it is fair to point out when a site takes several months to cover a major label release that is generally really on top of covering prominent releases by the week of the release date or soon after.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
pitchfork's coverage is pretty spotty, though, and there is no attempt to cover anything close to a significant amount of major releases. also was love vs money prominent? they never reviewed love vs hate, did they? also it didn't place very high.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
*major label releases
but i mean they take months to review LOTS of things...they're only really on top of stuff that their core audience is going to be expecting a review of.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not saying they cover everything prominent, obviously they don't. I'm just saying with most 'major' releases that the average Pitchfork reader is angling to see a review of, they're usually very prompt w/ coverage so that tardier coverage seems notable or somehow a statement in and of itself. (xpost)
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:32 (fifteen years ago)
the thing that CAD is getting at wrt to voting blocs for seemingly random songs was the exact same criticism levied at mid-decade pitchfork when nick sylvester, sean fennessey & tom breihan et al got clipse's "zen" to the #2 track of 2005 (or whatever it was) right? or when beanie sigel and the game made it on the albums list. stuff like that is always gonna happen when you have a small number of ppl voting in a group list.
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
it would be hilarious to read a pitchfork review of love vs money, but i really don't see them reviewing it, ever. i hope i'm wrong!
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
yeah -- tbh i have no idea how big or small the voting pool is for this list or for those old lists (xpost)
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
or when Miranda Lambert hit Stylus' top three.
(xxxpost)
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:35 (fifteen years ago)
jordan you might be right--do we have any insight into how this list was created (i.e. how many voters, how many songs did they vote for, and how much massaging of the results was done)?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:35 (fifteen years ago)
i still think there's a difference between how indie ppl receive indie music and how they receive non-indie music but it's probably going away with downloading and in the end i guess i don't really care.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno, didn't deej review the Maxwell album?
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
do we have any insight into how this list was created
If a poster gets 51 SBs, it immediately triggers a poll. Once the poll's results are in, we have a thread discussing what to make of them. If someone on the thread suggests that a second poll is in order, that automatically triggers a re-poll. The re-poll's end-date, when it arrives, automatically triggers seven new polls on the same subject. The names of the seven polls are Envy, Sloth, Gluttony, Greed, Avarice, Pride, and Lust. The Lust poll is on the ILTMI board but the other six polls are granted their own boards, whose continued survival is assured, or not, only by daily polls on whether they should be allowed to continue. If the daily-survival poll participation threshold drops below 50% of those ILX registered posters with ten or more posts to their names over the past month, this triggers a poll. The poll triggered by this concerns whether Physical Graffiti is a better album than Judy Garland's Judy at Carnegie Hall. The results of this final poll are binding.
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
i'm all for voting blocs if it means blasting sweet and totally deserving album tracks to the top of a list. i guess it's the type of thing you have to be careful about, but "idioteque" is a wonderful song and if they had to put some heads together to get it up there well ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
my problem now is that it seems like - and im basing this mostly on the 08 list - their mainstream pop/hip-hop and r&b choices are way less inspired than they were in 04/05 - the 08 list seemed like it was like "flashing lights" and nu-t.i. stuff that is not good but since t.i. is now established on their site that they should like a 'return to form' rap single like "no matter what" which is just okay & no one cared about
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
mr. que are you bored? are there other threads you could do this in?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
was "whatever you like" on the 08 list?
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
also i always thought it was funny when the individual lists were posted and 3 or 4 posters would have the new fall out boy or paramore or my chemical romance albums listed and yet they were never reviewed - it seems like mainstream rock is one place where pfork never got comfortable going unless it was like "sugar, i'm goin down" or something (and now even with track reviews back it seems more like it's used for songs that no one has heard & everyone will forget instead of back in the day when it was to set forth the site's opinion on big tracks as well as lesser known stuff)
makes me wonder how tim f got that 8.1 review of futuresex/lovesounds up
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
just saying--it might be a good idea to take nabisco's advice and look at this as a mixtape or whatever rather than *the* list of all time. i mean it's just a fun list, designed to trigger conversation, do we really need to see the breakdowns and stuff to be able to enjoy it?
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
Well, clearly some people do!
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
JT is up there w/ Jay-Z in no brainer gotta cover mainstream (xpost)
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
i think the three highest hip hop tracks were "a milli" (this deserves it), "flashing lights" (barely even an 08 single) & "live your life" and "no matter what" (lol what) - mid decade pfork rap renaissance had much more inspired & nuance taste than the hip-hop voters do now
(basically what i mean is that the 'indie voters' or w/e can push the grouper album into the top 50 but there's no one to push the rap equivalent of the grouper album into the top 50, which is basically what happened when beanie sigel made the top 50 list)
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:34 PM (7 minutes ago)
uh not really, if they got the right writer?
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
pls look upthread where i say exactly this? i think this is actually an interesting conversation and that it's not that weird to be curious about how the list was built given p4k's past editorial practices on these things?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think there's any real reason why pitchfork should be covering the-dream tbh - i mean it sold a lot of copies but it's not like i feel like they should be reviewing chrisette michelle either - i mean there's def not a huge groundswell afaik aside from deej & tim f who are like 5% of the writing staff compared to juelz santana mixtapes or whatever it was back then
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
i think the right review would get lots of their readers into him. i can't be the only dude who got hooked on him despite not really being up on recent r&b at all.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
it seems like mainstream rock is one place where pfork never got comfortable going unless it was like "sugar, i'm goin down" or something (and now even with track reviews back it seems more like it's used for songs that no one has heard & everyone will forget instead of back in the day when it was to set forth the site's opinion on big tracks as well as lesser known stuff)
otm. the only chart pop/hip hop tracks i've seen reviewed lately got low scores. um i think maybe there is some sort of a consensus among pitchfork writers that 2003-05 was a "golden age" for pop music, i think in the sound of silver review this is adressed. anyways, all track reviews now are "here is what we think of songs that are getting played on like every blog in the world right now."
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
yeah CAD for the record I'm not entirely disagreeing with you -- sometimes you get a situation where like a dozen people think Band X released the best songs of the decade, but don't automatically agree on which one ... and since nobody makes tracks like where the top 10 is all their favorite artist, it can help to try and find some consensus pick, however artificial. thing is, that can actually work for pop singles, too: you can have a dozen people who all think Jay-Z or Missy Elliott released the best singles of the decade, but not automatically agree on which one! so yeah, there's a desire to look for broad "important" consensus picks and not just vote your weird personal favorite.* and sometimes with pop acts that means gathering around the big single; sometimes with "album" acts it means gathering around album centerpieces and "statements" and the like.
I guess more of my point was that this happens anyway, outside of lists -- that pop singles and album centerpieces/statements create a consensus that This Is the Important Thing totally outside of critics and lists. often I think that's the point of them -- that the indie band putting together that album anthem is trying to define what it's about every bit as much as the pop star putting together a new single.
* (we would probably get more interesting and singlesy lists if people didn't do this, but of course they'd be super-weird: a bunch of critics who all thought Jay-Z recorded the best single of the decade, and all thought "Toxic" was okay and merited #97, might come up with a list topped by Britney with no Jay-Z on it at all.)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
their mainstream pop/hip-hop and r&b choices are way less inspired than they were in 04/05
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
the rap equivalent of the grouper album
Trying to imagine what sort of record this would be...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:42 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i dunno maybe it's just that i personally thought '08 was a VERY weak year for rap (not R&B) singles, but i dn't feel like that's so offensive really. woulda been nice if "Put On" was higher, i guess, but for the most part what little i did like wasn't stuff i'd have expected to see on that list anyway.
xpost haha what jaymc said
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
yeah nabs that makes sense and ftr i think most of the time that model works. there are other times where maybe i missed the consensus or wasn't around for it, and a few that leave me genuinely questioning.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
o_O. Things like Two Weeks, or Rebellion (Lies), or A-Punk etc. were all proper singles and had videos that were all over the web and got played shitloads in clubs and on the radio and stuff.
― ecuador_with_a_c, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's a question of audience size, though. An R. Kelly or Jay-Z single might be heard by 100 times as many people as hear the whole album, the ratio might be more like 5-to-1 for something like Vampire Weekend. I'm making those numbers up, the margin may be way smaller (or way bigger) but there's definitely a significant margin.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
xp let me know what clubs you go to so i can avoid them.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
"rebellion (lies)" was nothing less than a big 'ole booty-blastin single here in montreal, as were neighborhoods 1, 2 and 3, so i am not surprised at all to see some of them near the top of this list.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
haha CAD can we reach a point on ILX where we take that kind of joke as a given and don't need to actually make it every time?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
I can easily imagine a Pitchfork writer who wouldn't have otherwise bothered with Vampire Weekend but saw that his colleagues voted "Oxford Comma" onto the 2008 list and so he listened to it and decided he liked it and, even though he still doesn't care so much about hearing the album, he might give the song some love at a later date. I think a lot of the support for those seemingly random album tracks becomes codified just through a small group of people liking something and other people getting curious and picking up on it -- it doesn't even have to be a conspiratorial voting bloc or anything, just people saying "hey, what's the one song I need to hear from that Dirty Projectors album?" or whatever. A lot of that popularity certainly reverberates in the indie culture at large, as Nabisco notes, but I presume some of it just happens on the staff message board or in conversations among friends.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
lol i don't know if the ilx platonic ideal will ever be within reach--down here in the real world some things just need to be said xp
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah -- maybe people are nicer and less territorial about their indie rock than I am. I tend to love the bands I love deeply and aggressively ignore the stuff that doesn't seem like my bag, even if they have an OK single or two.
― some dude, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, maybe "Oxford Comma" isn't the best example because there were a couple of other songs from that Vampire Weekend that also got a lot of attention, so it seems like you'd probably end up listening to the whole album anyway if it piqued your interest -- but "The Rat" might well have gotten as high as it did because of a situation like that. I mean, I'm pretty sure I downloaded it after seeing it on either Pitchfork's or Stylus's half-decade list and was like "wow, this is fantastic," but I've sort of gotten the impression that the Walkmen haven't done anything else as good as that, so I've never even bothered to seek out their albums.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
I've sort of gotten the impression that the Walkmen haven't done anything else as good as that
You can say that again.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that's a great example. Maybe some others can be found in the kinds of rock tracks nobody here would question: lots of people listened to McLusky in an album way, right, but I'll bet not even that many of their superfans second-guess "To Hell with Good Intentions" as the one that goes on lists and mixes.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
Hard to beat "Lightsaber Cocksucking Blues," IMO...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, what the hell, "Alan is a Cowboy Killer" is the McLusky track I got on a mix and I've never heard another half as good.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
I have a mix from a superfan with Without MSG I Am Nothing on it--but I think Mclusky Do Dallas is considered the best album by superfans
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
Using the "one song people can rally around" criterion doesn't seem to apply to the very peculiar set of songs that comprise the 20009 entries on this list, though. Even among the singles discussed by Pitchfork this year, some of these - "French Navy", "Velvet", "Rain On", "Young Adult Friction", for example - were not even the best reviewed. It does seem like there are several tracks, even from indie albums, that have sparked more of a critical consensus this year. Is this really the best group of songs we've had for the first 2/3 of the year?
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
They seem to be the ones that the Pitchforkers who participated in this remembered the most.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
There hasn't been a monster pop song this year, maybe? No Umbrella or Sexyback or Crazy in Love or something like that.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
i think if "blame it" or "birthday sex" were r. kelly songs and not jamie foxx & jeremih songs, pfork types would be all over both of them on some "ignition (remix)" shit (at the very least on some "i'm a flirt" shit)
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
or if "turnin me on" was a rihanna song - it just seems like pitchfork got turned on to pop/rap/r&b back in the mid decade and have gone back the opposite way now while still keeping the door open for those big mid-decade artists.
again, the r. kelly mixtape had a track review up within one or two days of it leaking to the internet, but you can't read jack shit on pfork about any other good & successful r&b this year.
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw my mclusky track would be dethink to survive. mclusky on this list is exactly what i'm talking about.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
same thing with ciara - "oh" & "goodies" & "lose control" were big pop/r&b singles back in the mid-decade, so now pitchfork runs a review of the new ciara cd with a 3.2 rating (or whatever it was). who does this serve? pop fans by and large certainly don't care about what pfork has to say about ciara. pitchfork's core readership isn't going to be tempted to check out ciara based on that review, and if anything it's just going to cement suspicions that pop stars are just empty artless robots.
why couldn't that ciara review space been used for a good r&b album like, say, the-dream's?
― sailor goon (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
Let's not mention the two biggest songs of the year, both created by a band whose name rhymes with Schmack Pie Bees.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
man mclusky are so awesome
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
J0rdan's last post was otm.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
a band whose name rhymes with Schmack Pie Bees
I give up. Black Eyed Peas? What are the songs?
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
Re the effect of a The-Dream review on Pitchfork: I don't think it would win many people over at all actually. The impression I get is that my reviews are mostly left alone from an editing perspective (bar taking out pointless asides and unnecessarily detailed track descriptions etc.) because - omg WHAT - the proportion of site visitors who read them is infinitesimally small.
JT was one exception: I got a lot of angry emails from readers about that review, simply because of the fact that everyone knew JT and they were shocked it was even being covered by the site. Whereas their eyes glide right over, say, Amerie, let alone The-Dream... And I don't think it's coincidence that my JT review was one where the editors were much more involved in shaping the final result (not overall judgment or the score, just the usual structure-tinkering, "that bit doesn't make sense" kinda stuff).
― Tim F, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel, "Boom Boom Pow" broke a record on the charts this year, didn't it?xpost
― Dan S, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
Don't know. I'm out-of-the-loop with respect to a lot of pop stuff.
But I'm glad to hear about it. I'll try to YouTube a clip.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
no! don't listen to the Black Eyed Peas! Don't do it, Daniel!
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
haha guys I didn't mean that there wasn't disagreement about which McLusky tracks people like best, just that it didn't seem to me like anyone would be all "by what logic did 'To Hell with Good Intentions' wind up getting chosen?" -- although possibly I was really wrong in that presumption! maybe it's just me or people I talk to or Pitchfork writers: for some reason that just seems like a case where people listen to the band's stuff and somehow come to an organic consensus that that track is the big broad stand-out thing that somehow works as a "face." maybe not! substitute Life Without Buildings' "The Leanover?"
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Too late, Mr. Que. Too late now.
It's . . . meh. Nothing as compelling as the pop songs I mention above. I'm not surprised it didn't make Pitchfork's list.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 26 August 2009 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
I do like that they say Mazel Tov, tho.
the leanover is probably the best choice (and i think it is a single too!) but there are two or three other defensible ones i think for lwb. maybe it's curiosity about how these consensuses (lol is that the plural??) come about. the phenomenon you are describing seems perfectly reasonable for any small group but are all these groups, everywhere, coming to similar conclusions? i guess they probably are.
tim, i suppose i meant it would win over people who read it. i guess if they were really concerned about all the reviews getting read as much as possible they wouldn't be out on these limbs writing about this stuff at all. i mean that amerie song was their #2 single of 2005--probably SOME people got into it based on that.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:15 PM (2 hours ago)
yeah i'm sure arcade fire being from there had nothing to do w/ that
― mod indecent (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:28 (fifteen years ago)
You're right. I think sometimes though people ascribe more power to pitchfork to change its audience's mind about stuff than it actually has. Foisting the new indie hope on people is something pitchfork does well because people go to the site looking for that new hope.
Sites like ILX are much more effective at actually challenging people's aesthetic blinkers than a site like Pitchfork can be. If you got all those Stereogum posters onto ILX probably two thirds of them would sound very different within about six months.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
IT'S HERE AND I LIKE IT
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 26 August 2009 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
re: nabisco many xposts back
I know you weren't saying I did, but I should just point out that I have no objections to the indie album tracks picks at all. Neighborhood 1 is amazing, as is Jesus Etc. and Poor Places. I was just looking at it from the perspective of the aforementioned pop/hip hop singles v indie tracks thing. Mostly wondering how people gathered around those particular ones. Rebellion and Power Out were the big Arcade Fire songs around here, as they were played at indie clubs ad nauseum, so for me finding the consensus would be looking at places where I saw the most communal appreciation. I'm not sure where that same appreciation came for Jesus Etc. over Ashes of American Flags, though I'm not saying it didn't.
Neighborhood 1 is the first track on the album, and I think it brilliantly announced what the band were doing and what they intended. It wasn't a single as far as I know, so to me it's a representation of the album. I have no doubt that you're right about the communal gathering around it, I just didn't experience the same thing, and thought of other tracks as more immediately popular.
What you say about the ballads is interesting, because listening through the list I noticed a lot of the indie songs were ballads. The Liars track off Drum's Not Dead is a key example (wonderful song I had neglected for too long, I should add).
Idioteque is an interesting one. There was a makeshift video for it, even if it wasn't a single, and it's also more likely to be played at indie clubs than any other off the album. I think it might have been chosen for historical significance, as it was both classic radiohead but also a massive departure, and in some was represented the electro-bent indie music/fans would take over the coming years.
Which takes me back to the choices as more historical significance rather than best songs. I find it difficult to believe that B.O.B. is actually considered the best song of the decade by so many people, but I also recognize that there was a lot in it that predicted what was to come, or perhaps what could have been.
I think that's a good thing, by the way.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 27 August 2009 02:03 (fifteen years ago)
if anything i feel like "Idiotheque" shouldn't be so highly rated now because the novelty or boldness of them doing a track like that has worn off and it's just, oh, one of many many good dance/beat-oriented tracks by rock bands this decade.
― some dude, Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:06 (fifteen years ago)
Well, no, it still sounds cooler than any other Radiohead song to my ears; its sonic boldness or novelty has nothing to do with it (okay, little).
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:07 (fifteen years ago)
Erin Mcleod took over the reggae/dancehall monthly column after Stelfox moved on, but now the column seems to have disappeared. They have one guy who reviews Afropop reissues on ocassion, but no monthly column for him, alas.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:30 (fifteen years ago)
substitute Life Without Buildings' "The Leanover?"
The only reason why it makes sense to me that "The Leanover" is the big go-to LWB track is that there was an acoustic version that was floating around that it seemed like people were pretty into. But I love that whole album, so every track's a winner for me.
― jaymc, Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:44 (fifteen years ago)
I want that Life Without Buildings album!
― Evan, Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:47 (fifteen years ago)
I like his new band the Future of the Left even better.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:51 (fifteen years ago)
Tom Ewing on "The Decade in Pop": http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7703-the-decade-in-pop/
― kshighway, Thursday, 27 August 2009 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
thread got long but did you guys determine who liked the-dream first?
― the turdlike genius of Jeff Tweete´ (M@tt He1ges0n), Thursday, 27 August 2009 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
You did, I think.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 August 2009 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
― kshighway, Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:02 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is great btw
― some dude, Thursday, 27 August 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
yah it was very good.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 August 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
V. much so.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 August 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
Very much enjoyed it (just finished).
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 27 August 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
Ditto.
― jaymc, Thursday, 27 August 2009 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
I'm very sad it has no comments section.
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 27 August 2009 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
good article and I don't even know/care about at least half the people mentioned in it (there's really a producer named Bloodshy? wtf)
― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 27 August 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
Bloodshy & Avant produced "Toxic"
― some dude, Thursday, 27 August 2009 18:36 (fifteen years ago)
Great articles. The Pop one has started a good discussion between me and my mate as to why American Idol has produced bugger all great music (just No Air + Kelly) as opposed to lots of great stuff over here (Girls Aloud, Leona Lewis, Will Young, some other singles by lemar, liberty x etc.) although the conclusion came down to... ummm, maybe we just haven't listened to anything by the ammy idol winners and don't know if anything good has been made.
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
(just No Air + Kelly)
I thought "Before He Cheats" was pretty good.
― jaymc, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
Did none of Jordin's other songs make it over there? "One Step At A Time" is also good; the rest is... well... yeah.
Lots and lots of ppl also love Carrie Underwood even though I hate her like she was a sentient creeping plague intent on raping and murdering my family before my disbelieving eyes and both Ruben and Fantasia have mostly had their success in stage work. Pretty sure Kris Allen will continue the trend started by Taylor Hicks and David Cook of being another white guy AI winner incapable of having a memorable impact on the entertainment industry.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
oh haha David Cook went platinum, who knew???
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
a cherrypicked mix CD of the best of AI alumni would be pretty great. no idea how it would compare to that of people from the British equivalents since only Leona Lewis made it over here at all.
― some dude, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
The Pop one has started a good discussion between me and my mate as to why American Idol has produced bugger all great music (just No Air + Kelly) as opposed to lots of great stuff over here (Girls Aloud, Leona Lewis, Will Young, some other singles by lemar, liberty x etc.) although the conclusion came down to... ummm, maybe we just haven't listened to anything by the ammy idol winners and don't know if anything good has been made.
what? when it comes to track record, AI >>>>>>>>>> all british reality tv contests: they've given us kelly clarkson, fantasia, jennifer hudson, carrie underwood and jordin sparks! apart from girls aloud, everyone else you listed on the UK side has one good song to their name and no real sense of individuality.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
actually apart from girls aloud, who were a special case anyway (and who are now terrible), british reality tv has given us precisely THREE good singles and no interesting careers.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
i'll give you the no interesting careers bit. will also youtube this underwood lass but i thought hudson was an actress? oh well, i mentioned my ignorance in the original post, so i'm really backtracking - ai could be better, it just doesn't seem so.
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
Hudson made her breakthrough by winning an Oscar but she's still putting out music; I think she's been more embraced by the club scene than anywhere else.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
oops... so i'm *not* really backtracking
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
j-hud released an album last year - patchy but had some great tracks on it, search "spotlight" (the single), "i'm his only woman" (duet w/fantasia) and "my heart" in particular. OHHH and the INCREDIBLY LARGE AND EPIC quentin harris remix of "spotlight" too!
the polow da don remix of fantasia's "when i see u" is one of the very best singles of the 00s.
uh i have only actually heard one carrie underwood song but "before he cheats" is fantastic.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
(has j-hud had (m)any acting roles which don't require her to sing? not really up on her film career)
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
great article but some of the points were completely rong to me like:
But there are times when pop is so consistently grand that you truly want it to stop where it is forever. One such period was the early 00s.
― sylvia plathter cathter (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
Did she sing in "Sex and the City" or "The Secret Lives of Bees"? I would think it would have been out of place.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
ah ok. i hope she carries on making music - she has such a great, generous voice.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
haha the early '00s were easily the best part of the decade
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
early 00s were a golden age wherever i looked: r&b and hip-hop coming over from the US (and crossing over regularly into the UK charts, oh halcyon days), 2-step in the UK (also with commercial success), teenpop on both sides of the atlantic taking cues from both...
― lex pretend, Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
pink was a hero to most but she never meant shit to me
― sylvia plathter cathter (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 27 August 2009 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
If there was a turn to pop online, it didn't happen on a critical level so much as at a network level-- hard drive by hard drive, blog by blog.
"hard drive by hard drive" is a terrific metaphor for hard-won popularity that's new to my eyes. I'm surprised it was not discovered by the masses, and beaten to death, years ago. It's certainly more lively a reference for success these days than anything that has to do with "charts."
― Cunga, Thursday, 27 August 2009 21:20 (fifteen years ago)
I still don't get what's so amazing about "Hot N' Cold" but I'm surprised it wasn't mentioned anywhere between the 500 singles list and the Decade In Pop feature..
― billstevejim, Friday, 28 August 2009 01:28 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno, i like that song but it's kind of a blip in a sea of Max Martin/Dr. Luke stuff that gets referred to several times in there
― some dude, Friday, 28 August 2009 01:32 (fifteen years ago)
video #50. what a way to start.
― abanana, Monday, 31 August 2009 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
ahahahaa #29 I <3 u
― butthurt (deej), Monday, 31 August 2009 08:32 (fifteen years ago)
gonna be disappointed if i scroll through this and trapped in a closet doesn't win :(
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Monday, 31 August 2009 08:37 (fifteen years ago)
it doesn't
― Moka, Monday, 31 August 2009 08:39 (fifteen years ago)
Eh, 2nd is fine.
― b hoy hoy (a hoy hoy), Monday, 31 August 2009 08:40 (fifteen years ago)
Are you surprised by her tears? Strong women also cry...strong women also cry.
lol'd
― Mordy, Monday, 31 August 2009 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ "flashing lights" being on that list, wtf
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
Hm, I'm rarely aware of videos, but that one seemed to be a big deal when it came out.
― jaymc, Monday, 31 August 2009 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
lots of Kanye videos were big deals that weren't hollow 'artsy' excuses for big tits bouncing in slow motion that cut off the last 1/3rd of the song to build suspense for a part 2 that never existed.
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
"Dear Justin and Kanye, you know how you were 2 of the biggest pop stars of the decade and millions and millions were spent on your video spectacles that were in heavy rotation on every video channel? Well, your videos only mattered if they were directed by Spike Jonze, featured an indie rocker lip syncing your song, featured you lip syncing a classic rocker's song, or were SNL skits."
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
But everyone who saw one of those videos went out and formed a band. Uh.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 31 August 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
it's not like a lot of their proper big budget videos weren't shit anyway, but it's kinda like doing a list of '80s videos and ranking "Eat It" over any Michael Jackson vid
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
music videos in being shitty shocka
― call all destroyer, Monday, 31 August 2009 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
get yourself and egg and beat it
― Mr. Que, Monday, 31 August 2009 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
hollow 'artsy' excuses for big tits bouncing in slow motion
fwiw this trumps most music videos in my book
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
Kanye's video for "Best I Ever Had" is the apotheosis of this style.
― Number None, Monday, 31 August 2009 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
If, for some reason, I magically become a famous pop musician, I vow to make videos of nothing but big tits bouncing in slow motion.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
I nominate Dan for "famous pop musician." Now go make "music" videos, plz.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 31 August 2009 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but if we're rewarding outstanding achievements in video hoedom we coulda at least gotten "tip drill" up in this list somewhere
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
shit, we didn't realize millions and millions of dollars were spent on those other videos, that does make them more impressive and important somehow. p.s. what video channels?
― scottpl, Monday, 31 August 2009 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmyATEHzEDk
― post-contrarian meta-challop 2009 (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 31 August 2009 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
lol like i said it's not like i think the alternative was all that great -- i'm just saying it's funny how you chose to represent the videographies of kanye and justin! xpost
― snrubber soul (some dude), Monday, 31 August 2009 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
i mean "rock your body" >>>>>> desperate attempt to get people to watch an elton john video
― scottpl, Monday, August 31, 2009 11:16 AM (55 minutes ago)
no, but it might mean that more people actually saw them
― stfuhut (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 August 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jJWQkVgDs4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unBACOHFXes
― stfuhut (k3vin k.), Monday, 31 August 2009 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I'm kind of depressed that the zach galifianakis version of that Kanye video is on there at all. Not funny.
― Back Like That (makeitpop), Monday, 31 August 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
I'm shocked at how bad that video list is.
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
The video for "Y Control" is like 8 million times better than the video for "Maps."
No "99 Problems" NO FUCKIN CRED
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
Also "Prime Time Of Your Life" and the Sigur Ros video with the 2 gay kids..
both are a million times better than watching some dude fall out of an airplane.
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
"Pork And Beans" is terrible. TERRIBLE
ok i'm done.
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressedYeah, I'm kind of depressed
imho, this is when you need to step back from reading Pitchfork lists
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 August 2009 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
imho, you're trying to reason with makeitpop
― some dude, Monday, 31 August 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
got me there
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 August 2009 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
"Dick In A Box" is better than "Rubber Johnny" ??
No, you're right Pitchfork.. I'm just a retard. What do I know?
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
The thing is, "Dick In A Box" IS better than "Rubber Johnny".
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
Shut up
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
Why? He's right.
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:09 (fifteen years ago)
Dick In A Box was funny the first time, whereas I would watch Rubber Johnny again.
I don't care if you think I'm wrong.
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
Something that is entertaining once > something that was never entertaining. "Rubber Johnny" is basically what happens when Hot Topic goes to film school.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
He doesn't care if you think he's wrong, he just thinks you're calling him retarded if you disagree.
― some dude, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
look, I'm not the one who put that on the table
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
Do music videos for indie tunes actually help the bands sell any records? Because I can't remember the last time I actually found out about a significant amount of the music I love from music videos.
― kshighway, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
I used to watch MTV obsessively from, say, 1997-2003ish, but now I barely, if ever, watch a music video. With YouTube, I've mostly watched live footage. Why are bands still making these things?
― kshighway, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:17 (fifteen years ago)
to advertise their new music, and to re-enact the act of putting one's joke in a box
― Mr. Que, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
AFAIK it's in their budget the labels take out of their earnings so they don't have that much of a choice
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
er, putting one's junk in a bix
box
What else would Pitchfork readers have to get all indignant about this week?
― 3 mods 1 banhammer (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
Does Windowlicker suck too? It wasn't this decade, but just wondering since same it's same director..
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
what ever happened to Reigndance
― Mr. Que, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
Me saying "Little Johnny" sucks automatically means I think every single thing Chris Cunningham has done is terrible!
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
Just wondering.. you said it's Hot Topic goes to film school..
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
On one side: unusual, entertaining music videos like "Windowlicker", "Come On My Selector" and "Come To Daddy" that enhance the music with which they are associated.
On the other side: a wholly self-indulgent, unscary piece of horseshit called "Rubber Johnny".
HOW ON EARTH CAN I RECONCILE THIS
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
Step One: Cut a hole in a box.
― Mr. Que, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
Well I guess that was a bad choice.. "99 Problems" was robbed however.
― billstevejim, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
dick in a box is a great song
― Thought you were regal/Now who needs "Boston Legal"? (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 31 August 2009 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzNTCxOJK3g
― Moka, Monday, 31 August 2009 17:35 (fifteen years ago)
I can't remember the last time I actually found out about a significant amount of the music I love from music videos.
I'm sure plenty of us are in this boat, but to be honest I have actually come back around to getting into plenty of things through videos. I mean, I think the one great potential of a video is that if it works really well with the song or artist's aesthetic, it can sometimes focus your attention and communicate the gist of the thing a bit more quickly -- i.e., instead of doing a few partial-attention listens before the song really leaps out and snaps into focus, you can get snapped into it more efficiently, maybe? Which is useful, in a time when there are LOADS of options and it's very easy for people to sort of half-hear and dismiss music in a cursory way. The Bat for Lashes video in there is a good example; I think I'd heard that a couple times in a background way and not much thought about it, but the video focused me into liking it. (It helps that the movement of the video really animates the flow of the song, calling attention to the places attention is wanted; it's a good tour guide.) I think I also use videos to make myself hear stuff I might not otherwise hear (like radio listening); thankfully there's at least one local video show here covering the kind of stuff I should probably be paying attention to.
This list has also reminded me that I always mentally mix up "Star Guitar" and various songs by the Field.
― nabisco, Monday, 31 August 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
The Bat For Lashes video basically made me buy both of her albums.
― I have a set of penises leftover from some bach party somewhere (HI DERE), Monday, 31 August 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
i'd never seen that vitalic video before, fuck that's great
― mince lice (electricsound), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 07:36 (fifteen years ago)
This "Top100 music videos of the decade" made by a Hungarian site is miles better than Pitchfork's. And not just because I took part in this poll: http://www.quart.hu/cikk.php?id=3847
― zeus, Tuesday, 1 September 2009 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
All these lists are missing Madonna's "What it Feels Like for a Girl." I know MTV only aired it once, but have that many people not seen it?
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 1 September 2009 11:05 (fifteen years ago)
zeus can you translate that site's explanation of why Benny Benassi 'Satisfaction' is the 20th best video of the 00s?
― unban dictionary (blueski), Tuesday, 1 September 2009 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
Erm..., it would be a bit difficult to translate, because it's not real explanation, just kind of joking. But what's the problem with 'Satisfaction'? Funny video, a good idea, give me 'Satisfaction' ahead of any Björk videos.
― zeus, Tuesday, 1 September 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
xpost Good call re: "What it feels like for a girl"
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 00:23 (fifteen years ago)
That Hungarian list is A+. They even included that amazing Rammstein video with the fat suits!! and Alala!!!! Very nicely done.. way better than the P2K list IMO.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 00:33 (fifteen years ago)
xpost Makes sense, nabisco. I guess I just have been seeing fewer and fewer music videos, and now actually seem to find out about bands through live YouTube footage more than any other sort of video medium.
― kshighway, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
ugh really? watching live footage on YouTube seems like the worst possible way to be exposed to a band for the first time.
― R Gmail Still Down? (Remember Me) (some dude), Wednesday, 2 September 2009 02:08 (fifteen years ago)
Not camera phone video, stuff like people uploading band performances from Letterman and such.
― kshighway, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 02:25 (fifteen years ago)
oh ok, that's not as bad. i used to set the VCR to tape the music performances on Letterman and Conan when i was in middle school.
― R Gmail Still Down? (Remember Me) (some dude), Wednesday, 2 September 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah! It's awesome that both of them book so many great bands. I also like watching clips from some British shows like Jools Holland.
But yeah, 99% of live footage of bands on YouTube is awful. It should improve a bit when the cameras that come with phones improve, but that will take a long time.
― kshighway, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 03:00 (fifteen years ago)
well i mean, the overwhelming majority of bootlegged recordings of live music will always suck no matter the technology. that's why it's better live.
― R Gmail Still Down? (Remember Me) (some dude), Wednesday, 2 September 2009 03:12 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, definitely.
― kshighway, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 03:16 (fifteen years ago)
"It should improve a bit when the cameras that come with phones improve, but that will take a long time."
You underestimate how quickly technology improves!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Th5DrOPTl2E
(Ironically a crappily uploaded video on youtube)
― Evan, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha!
― kshighway, Wednesday, 2 September 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
Loved the artists' best-of-decade feature. Selecting a definitive "best-of" list is a bit of a fool's errand (i.e., a fruitless mission; mind you, I still love reading the definitive lists -- and reading this thread), but there's a looser and lighter spirit to the artist lists. There are also dozens of items on the artists' lists that I doubt we'll see on many other best-of lists.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 9 September 2009 01:49 (fifteen years ago)
there's a looser and lighter spirit to the artist lists
yeah, i 100% agree. my favourites of the pitchfork bunch were john darnielle's, dave longstreth's, and the no age guy's list. i like how rather than a critic who is concerned i guess with repping for strong, lasting albums, and having a wide ranged of styles covered, or having more culturally significant albums on their lists, artists' lists are refreshingly subjective and give a glimpse into their musical universe and cool alternative musical histories. also it's hilarious how certain artists just busted out full length pitchfork essays.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:17 (fifteen years ago)
There are also dozens of items on the artists' lists that I doubt we'll see on many other best-of lists.
Really? I thought it was funny how the same early '00s albums kept popping up on everyone's lists -- Kid A, Vespertine, Is This It and any Black Dice record. It reads almost like clockwork...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:22 (fifteen years ago)
i enjoyed carl newman mocking his own mundane taste.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:23 (fifteen years ago)
I was glad to see so many early 00s records show up at all, because journalists and music writers have this "weathercock" problem of only repping what has been cool for the last two or three years- I find a lot of these summing up the decade list-making activities are heavily weighted to the recent past- looking over so many of these lists people's repression of electroclash and Fischerspooner and Crossover and W.I.T. and Peaches and Adult and all the stuff they rocked out to circa 2000/2001 is kind of, er, amnesiac, innit?
What is the Benjamin quote, "nothing is less erotic than our parent's fashions"?, i.e. the recent past is a little embarrassing, it seems.
― Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that was funny. "Let's throw Neko Case's Fox Confessor in here as well and be done with the nepotism. I love you, woman." I LOVE YOU, TOO, WOMAN!
I thought it was funny how the same early '00s albums kept popping up on everyone's lists -- Kid A, Vespertine, Is This It and any Black Dice record. It reads almost like clockwork...
Sure there's going to be a lot of commonly-chosen discs. But consider the many, many novel and interesting choices some of the artists made, e.g., Carl Newman (of The New Pornographers) choosing The Rock*A*Teens, Sweet Bird of Youth; Britt Daniel (of Spoon) choosing Cliff Martinez, Solaris OST; J0hn D. choosing Christine Fellows' song Vertebrae; Tim Ruttilli (of Califone) choosing Mighty Flashlight/Mike Fellows, Self-Titled/Limited Storyline Guest; and on and on.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 9 September 2009 02:43 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that's a good point. I'm trying to prepare a decade-end list of my own, and every time I think about including a personal favorite that doesn't get much love, I fret about the classic album I'm invariably omitting to make room for it. Musicians usually don't give as much of a shit about this.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
^^that often makes me re-evaluate the "classic" album though, often along the lines of "how much do i really feeling like listening to it" &c. if a "classic" album deserves to be there, you'd think of it as a personal favourite.
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:25 (fifteen years ago)
True.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
+1 on J0hn's choice of Vertabrae, that song (and that song alone) once reduced me to a blubbering mess
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdnY9d0Zuzk
― Tourtière (Ówen P.), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
^ not an official video.
― Tourtière (Ówen P.), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
i found it really funny that the xx dude went on about fwd, it means i have regularly gone clubbing w/them.
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
i think what distinguishes what i consider classic albums from my personal favourites is maybe the opposite of what lex said? a personal favourite was an album i was deeply in love with at a certain time, and is preserved in a glossy, bright haze by the glory of those memories. alot of these albums are imperfect in a lovely way, aren't albums i would expect the average critic to rate highly. when i listen to it, i don't necessarily rediscover a new wonderful aspect of it, but it's a nice warm hug. a classic album is one i can never really digest, and although i might go months without listening to, will be blown away every time i do reach for it.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
This is going to turn into "When you say 'greatest' you can't possibly mean 'favorite' because they're like separate things," isn't it?
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
It's the same thing, but I think there's a difference between private favorites and critically approved favorites. You may like them both equally, but as a critic you may feel like you're on safer ground when you extol the latter.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
as a critic you should be saying "fuck being on safer ground as a critic"
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
its so much more complicated than that dudes
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
at some point you have to admit that making a list is all a bunch of fronting & consciously constructing your 'taste' and your 'favorites' -- a wholly unquantifiable thing -- for the world to see
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 21:00 (fifteen years ago)
You were close!
― "So messy!" (HI DERE), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
so when someone says 'greatest' vs. 'favorites' theyre just articulating different impulses that both go into everyone's list making activities to some degree or another
― butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 9 September 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
I'd agree with that. I often find myself aware of the fact that there are certain albums I like in part because I want to like them. It doesn't mean my enjoyment of them is phony at all (I'm not pretending to like them), but it might indicate that I've given them more of a chance than some other albums I've encountered. And surely on some level I do this because I want to think of myself as a certain kind of person, the kind who likes albums like that.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
I think these debates can get tied up in defining terminology, as if, were we able to satisfactorily work out what "favourite" or "greatest" means, suddenly our top 100 albums of the decade list would be straightforward and obvious.
For me these choices are more mundanely construed, like "how do I compare the album I listened to every day for six months but don't much listen to now against the album I listen to once every three months but like more every time I do?"
This is a personal issue but the idea of "greatest" feeds into it, because often what stimulates me to pull out an album again is reading people talk about it - this habit of mine privileges stuff that is commonly liked and considered great over my obscure (or simply unheralded) personal favourites. Like, I tend to think of M.A.N.D.Y.'s Body Language mix as my go-to selection for an early 05 electro-house-into-minimal dj mix, because that's the one that I get reminded of all the time (partly because of its more erm canonical track selection, partly because it predicted the future so successfully). But at the time I liked Damian Lazarus's Rebel Futurism #2 equally and listened to it more often.
Not sure if the individual writers lists will be published. Mine was done very hurriedly and I left off a whole bunch of favourite albums (the second Rio Baile Funk comp, Last Exit, Finery) so I feel a bit bad about it.
On topic, I loved that Bob Stanley's single of the decade was "Flowers".
― Tim F, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
I used to think that I could objectively determine my favorite albums through iTunes playcounts, since 95% of my album listening happens on iTunes/iPod, but then I realized that there are lots of albums I put on quite often, especially at work, because they're pleasant or familiar or unobtrusive, but which I may not really be particularly passionate about. (I call this the Sea and Cake Factor.)
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 23:21 (fifteen years ago)
yeah play count can say a lot but no way can it say everything
― some dude, Wednesday, 9 September 2009 23:32 (fifteen years ago)
no one said otherwise
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Thursday, 10 September 2009 00:30 (fifteen years ago)
sorry, thought you were responding to me directly. maybe you were, I don't know. but yeah, that's pretty self-evident.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Thursday, 10 September 2009 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
last.fm play count will be invaluable simply for not forgetting anything.
"how do I compare the album I listened to every day for six months but don't much listen to now against the album I listen to once every three months but like more every time I do?"
absolutely true, and also stuff like "how do i compare this album with 6 songs i can't stop listening to and 6 songs i don't care about, to this album with 12 pretty good songs which i rarely obsess over individually?"
ultimately, instinct is a pretty solid way to go to judge these things.
― lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 08:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah exactly, I don't know how you'd really do it otherwise. But then I feel like my instincts themselves can ossify somewhat - the more you say "x is my favourite album of y", the easier it is to say that again almost without thinking next time.
― Tim F, Thursday, 10 September 2009 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
oh yeah, but i'm always pretty aware of when something becomes my default, and it's usually in cases where there's no real actual answer. fav album ever? aaliyah! fav madonna single? "deeper and deeper"!
― lex pretend, Thursday, 10 September 2009 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah "Deeper & Deeper" is a great example for me too! If I'm honest there's about five or six Madonna tunes that could stand in for it but it's easier just to choose one and stick with it.
― Tim F, Thursday, 10 September 2009 10:23 (fifteen years ago)
Loved yesterday's The Decade In Noise feature. This sentence --
Many followers now think of it as not just harsh sonic assaults, but also abstract improvisation, ecstatic free jazz, lo-fi pop, outsider avant-rock, minimalist drone, power electronics, and more.
-- brought a lot of this decade's "noise music" together for me.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 15 September 2009 07:03 (fifteen years ago)
I don't really like the piece on noise but maybe because they have to do a lot of introducing in it. Like the Pop piece had the luxury of just naming names and drawing its own contexts since the canon context is so well established and well-known that it allowed Ewing to be kind of playful and not have to explain everything. But I suppose the noise thing is in a way a sort of primer and if you've had any sort of interest in noise music over the last ten years it just sounds quite a lot like a synopsis of stuff you already know, I can imagine a similarly registered piece on something like, I dunno, the last ten years of dancehall or country or something I'm completely oblivious to being really interesting and informative so YMMV.
― ❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈colinda❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
i didn't like how it started off with an animal collective analogy.
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
i was gonna say that too but I thought that was just clusterfuck incitement
― plax (I know, right?), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
also how it kind championed noise bands becoming less noisy, embracing song structures and whatever. not that this is a BAD thing, and obviously a site like pitchfork would welcome it, but it's gotten to the point where weird bands are all supposed to have a progression towards socalled maturity, like every noise band has to follow the sonic youth archetype in order to receive attention.
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
yeah perhaps i shouldn't have-i even like animal collective, but reading that i was just like "man can you guys not mention animal collective for like five seconds?"
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
tbh, I only really read the first page
― plax (I know, right?), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
also how it kind championed noise bands becoming less noisy
I see your point but they've also championed noise bands while they were at their noisiest. At least that's my (eroding) memory tells me.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
its that same thing that bothers me when ppl talk about, say, eno, and they're all "he takes all these avant garde ideas but has really good tunes AS WELL"
― plax (I know, right?), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
99.9% of critics expect bands to adhere to a narrative of progression (from noise to songs, from struggling drug dealer to rap star, etc) Woe betide the musician who does not meet these expectations.
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
or fit the paradigm etc.
Frankly whenever I read/hear someone talking about music in these terms I tune out immediately.
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
some post about AC where dominique talks about how he gradually lost interest in them as they got more song based that is pretty otm about all of this as far as I am concerned
― plax (I know, right?), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
i do actually like this article, though. and yeah i might have exaggerated the extent to which the narrative was valued, dude obviously knows his noise.
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
Just read that ... it was definitely a synopsis of what I already know. He acknowledges Oakland at the end, which made me happy.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
the noise -> songs thing is only one part of the narrative. The thing that I noticed most about the article was that it focused on acts and developments that would be most of interest to the Pitchfork readership. It definitely privileged more "popular" or "crossover" acts.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, it kinda raises the whole "noise" vs. "noisy _____" debate (i.e. "Noisy rock", "noisy jazz", "noisy rhythms", "noisy pop", etc.) discussion that we had on ILX once. There was a time when power electronics and hard Japanese noise had turned noise into a genre name, but it's just as functional as a kind of freefloating modifier for all sorts of genre-entangled formats and scenes that are not "noise" per se, and Pitchfork readers care more about the latter than the former, but all along it's been a fuzzy boundary. Spacerock and psychrock and kraut was hiding in the background of the aesthetic of a lot of the old guard in Japan (Hijokaidan, Masonna, Merzbow) and jazz is one context through to locate European and US folks like Voice Crack and Borbetomagus, so it may be that the myth of noise purity was always overstated.
― Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
were hiding, obv
I've only made it through the first two pages so far, but it seemed like the narrative was more about regional scenes bringing noise back out of the woodwork than bands developing cleaner sounds.
(xpost)
― Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
There was a time when power electronics and hard Japanese noise had turned noise into a genre name, but it's just as functional as a kind of freefloating modifier for all sorts of genre-entangled formats and scenes that are not "noise" per se
I think if I were to try and summarize the developments in noise in one sentence, this would be the thesis.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
Good overview for sure. I think one of the big things it leaves out is the role labels like Troubleman/Load/5RC had in pushing this stuff out to indie rock kids. Pretty amazing in these economic times to think of the money spent on noize just five years ago
― I'm really happy for that baby and I'mma let you Finnish (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
You forgot Skin Graft.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
Even 31G to a big extent
― I'm really happy for that baby and I'mma let you Finnish (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
I guess the question is, how much did those labels come out of regional scenes? Marc does mention Load and a few others in the article, but mostly in the context of regional scenes and artist-run/community enterprises.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
What do you guys make of Nabisco's 'Decade in Indie' piece?
― David Katz (davek_00), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
nabisco otm
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
very good article
― Dan S, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
great piece - well done nabsico
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
And he wrote it all from a fishing trawler in Hawaii.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
nah, i done heard that piece was ghosted by the fish.
― all you need is love vs. money (that's what i want) (Ioannis), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 18:41 (fifteen years ago)
Ha, the decision taken on the boat, based on radio play vs ichthyological behavior, was that fish love Bachman-Turner Overdrive (leading to much singing of "Taking Care of Fishes").
Thanks: it's all true: I do think something's poised to shift. The previous discussion about "noise" as a floating modifier was making me wonder about something funny -- you know how in the 90s the category of "alternative" was sorta given up to the mainstream, and more people clustered around "indie?" I keep wondering this week if the category of "indie" could be given up to the mainstream that way (as in the UK, I guess), and what might spring up under it. (The problem with this thought is that there's not so much of a clearly defined "mainstream" anymore for it to be given up to.)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
it's real good. it's nice when an article like that takes everything in on such a wide perspective, as if he were standing from really far away and looking at this jumble of shit happening and picking out archetypes and patterns, yet does it all with an air of optimistic, wink-and-a-pat-on-the-back-approval.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
In the UK, nothing ever really replaced "indie" as a catch-all term for alternative/underground musics.
― sean gramophone, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
I keep wondering this week if the category of "indie" could be given up to the mainstream that way (as in the UK, I guess), and what might spring up under it.
A new dawn in terror- Brokencyde are surpassed by Attack Attack!'s "Stick Stickly" and the emergence of CRABCORE
― dorroughmac (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
hmm, why hasn't that happened yet?
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
^^ yeah, this is always really interesting to me! and I think possibly quite meaningful in terms of how certain types of things are made and received there.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
great job nabs--you really captured a lot of sentiments that seem to just be "around" but had not nec. been explained accurately and concisely.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
Actually, crabcore is exactly what I thought Nabisco was getting at when he said, "Maybe something game-changing will crawl out of a Hot Topic somewhere; I don't know if you follow these things, but there are weirdnesses and genre collisions coming out of those scenes that make indie look kinda square."
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
Iwrestledabearonce
― Size-zero-brigade-embrace-token-chubby-chops (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
Stephenie Meyer, author of Twilight, not often accused of lacking insight into the hearts of America's young, just told the world what her favorite records were this summer-- Grizzly Bear and Animal Collective among them. (Do you think that's awesome, or does it make you want to listen to nothing but rap mixtapes and noise?)
I know this wasn't written about me but I'm pretty sure I listen to rap mixtapes and noise as a reaction to the music made by bands like grizzly bear and animal collective
― yo gotti gotti! (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
And yes, excellent article, btw. I've been waiting for someone to write an article just like that; so many people try to do these "what's the deal with indie" thinkpieces, and they invariably wind up either not quite getting it or just seeming kind of myopic. Nabisco's one of the only people I know who could do such an assignment justice.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
There were things about the songs that were comfortable and traditional, which was how consensus got built around them: They were easy to like. But there were also things about them that, in the context of their time, seemed rare and special and worth getting behind.
This really nails a certain feeling I had but maybe not about the particular acts you mention wrt indie a few years ago.
One thing, and I kindof feel like maybe ILX exaggerates this a bit, but indie as a gateway to other music definitely feels like a hallmark of this decade, something that is definitely encouraged by indie itself being such a general pilferer and re-framer of other musical ideas and poses and something which kindof contradicts the accusations so often leveled at indie scenes of insularity (I can't really imagine anyone investigating disco, house, dubstep AND country just off the back of mentions in Hip-Hop or Techno blogs/reviews at least to the same extent). The other side of the coin of this is the feeling that I get about indie fans that an indie appreciation of an act from another genre somehow validates that act moreso than the appreciation of the extant fanbase, but that could just be my own hangup base on years of ILM "*insert genre name here* for indie fans" dismissals.
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
It's a very nice article, nabisco. One thing that stuck out to me as a question after reading it comes from the following sentence: "Suddenly the big rap on indie was that it was po-faced and insular and lacking in passion, a self-congratulatory system of people in plaid shirts playing to audiences with their arms crossed." My question: why "suddenly"? What happened to bring this about? I think that you're right that something happened, and I'd like to hear more about what explains this (well, besides something like "9/11 duh").
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
My question is more, was it really so sudden?
― --nicci mane (some dude), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
i really don't get this fixation with and deprecation of arm-folding at shows.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
What happened to bring this about?
the crossover success of pop tracks "Crazy in Love" and "Hey Ya!" in 2003 (and "Toxic" in 2004) that were so undeniable in their appeal that it forced the po-faced indie kids to realise they were neglecting something.
― sean gramophone, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
See, I don't buy that. There were lots of pop songs just as good or better 2 or 3 or 5 years earlier, and if those had more indie kid crossover we'd be talking about how undeniably appealing those were instead.
― --nicci mane (some dude), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
Wrt the undeniable appeal of "Crazy In Love" etc.: nabisco goes on to say: "Because the more some people wanted to dig down toward something fresher and rowdier... the more they left that other indie sensibility, the allegedly polite and earnest and po-faced one, to sail its course." The sudden rise of this "big rap" on indie leads, on nabisco's account, to indie being increasingly separated from the mainstream.
xp yes
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
I thought it was a good article and it provoked some good questions.
What I'm wondering is, regarding the future of indie, is that, since indie is always groping for novelty and trying to differentiate itself from the mainstream or the masses, how can it separate itself when a) the idea of the mainstream is eroding (as Nabisco just said) and b) the omnipresent online communities can track and potentially blow-up your little scene before it has time to become anything bigger?
David Reisman covered this a bit in his "listening to popular music" essay in the 1950s (a must-read btw). He noted the attitude of a high school senior who loved "hot jazz" (read this as indie) and used his love of it to differentiate himself from all the other kids that liked the more "poplar" music of the day. Reisman wondered what will happen to this boy and the way he used music as a social marker when he got to college and, presumably, a plethora of kids loved the things that previously made him - and only him - special.
The story of that boy is kind of like the story of indie this decade. Thanks to the internet it's become much easier for anybody with broadband and some time on their hands to follow the scene and become an insider, but what becomes of the insider when he feels his special little world is being diluted? What becomes of an underground or indie movement when everybody is trying to touch the hem of its garment?
― Cunga, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
David Reisman covered this a bit in his "listening to popular music" essay in the 1950s (a must-read btw).
! I've been trying to find that essay again for years! I know it was anthologized, where did you find it? (Everyone who ever posted on this board and/or talked about music anywhere kinda needs to read it immediately.)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
I got it in a collection called "Individualism Reconsidered," which I bought from Biblio.com dirt cheap.
http://www.biblio.com/search.php?stage=1&title=individualism+reconsidered
― Cunga, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
xxxp Well, Nabisco does say that it happened "around the turn of the millennium." So I think that maybe takes into account Destiny's Child and Jay-Z and OutKast and Neptunes/Timbaland productions and not just the huge crossover hits of 2003. If you look at P&J singles lists in the late '90s, it's full of stuff like Hanson and Smashmouth; I do think there was a turning point, probably heralded by "Are You Gonna Be That Somebody" in 1998 but not really picked up on for a year or two, where pop music started to become "interesting" to the indie scene because people could say not just "oh, it's a really catchy pop song" but "this is actually really sonically innovative." Which is always something that indie has prized.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
some of the essay is here
http://books.google.com/books?id=WNubD3WKKDYC&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=%22listening+to+popular+music%22+david+reisman&source=bl&ots=SsvYS3XzUM&sig=TFbGk41dCEo1JbJN7NKNsja3B3U&hl=en&ei=1EuxSs_uJ9C3tweGx7ysCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
real indy rock: http://eis-blog.ucsc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/indiana_boulder.jpg
― yo gotti gotti! (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
A+
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
well Tom Ewing has been mentioning a lot lately how his way of getting indie ppl into pop is pointing out the production and stuff and with Timbaland and then the Neptunes, it really was a point in time where pop production was really showy and when the lionisation of the producer finally made a kind of authenticity for manufactured pop.
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
terrific piece. one question, tho: "white-belt metal"??? what it is???
― all you need is love vs. money (that's what i want) (Ioannis), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
metal bands from america's "white belt" (kansas, iowa, north dakota)
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
To be honest, I don't think that "big rap on indie" necessarily had a ton to do with pop at first. Imagine a person who spent the 1990s listening entirely to indie/rock and ignoring pop: toward the end of the decade, it'd be completely plausible to start feeling like the popular indie stuff was drifting in the direction of the quaint and "nice" and ambitious, etc. Plenty of the earlier complaints seemed to come from people who just enjoyed their indie a bit more rock, more noisy or thrashy or trashy. (I also remember feeling, toward the end of the 90s, that things like garage-rock felt sort of ghettoized and marginal, both in the "indie" world and on the punk side.) Consider the reaction that greeted bands like the Strokes, Hives, even like Black Rebel Motorcycle club -- even from deep within the ranks of people who mostly listened to indie, there was a reaction to these bands that was sort of like "oh right, rock stuff." And it seems really telling that those bands were not super-rocking, or anything!
In any case, the "big rap on indie" seemed to come from all different sorts of discontents -- there was the pop thing, yes; also the broadening and eye-opening that came with people getting out and talking on the internet (especially since I think "indie" types have traditionally, by necessity, sorta been big find-a-space-to-talk-about-music types); there were people who'd been in those garagier "ghettos" or listening to Estrus records or who'd always been repping for old skronky-guitar indie the whole time; I can't speak with much authority about punk stuff but I think there were certain fragmentations going on over there that pushed some listeners more over toward the "indie" category (that whole era of very indie-type "emo" has a role here, I think) .... like with any hegemony, I think the popular-indie "status quo" at that point had discontents of all different sorts, for all sorts of different reasons.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
My only quibble, nabisco, is with your point of emphasis. In my experience it wasn't so much "Crazy in Love, "Hey Ya," etc that caused the shift in sensibilities as the Internet and its democratizing effect (which you pointed out). I'm pretty sure that "One Sweet Day," "Bedtime Stories," "Un-break My Heart," or any other huge pop hit of the nineties would have penetrated the indie carapace had blogs and websites promoted them.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
- sarahel, I agree with you about arm-folding, but the idea was somehow so often used back then that it seemed an appropriate shorthand for that complaint- sorry for being opaque about belts: white metal-studded belts, once popular in the "emo" constellation, used here to refer generally and vaguely to "emocore" and/or metal from within what they call the "scene," etc.
xpost - yeah Alfred, I totally agree, as above -- I do think the "big rap on indie" was really an issue of self-definition, not that pop got so great it penetrated. (though it certainly helped that pop was, at the time, doing really good stuff in ways that would appeal to indie listeners -- e.g. that point about interesting and auterish electronic production.)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think that's true for the reason I said above, that the producer getting pushed forward and becoming a visible creative entity at the same moment that US pop productions were getting really showy and futuristic made a kind of narrative that indie fans could latch onto that the big pop of the 90's didn't really provide because it didn't break from the "they don't even play their own instruments" narratives
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
xp to alfred
Really, Alfred? "Unbreak My Heart"? I mean, that's a pretty standard-issue Diane Warren/David Foster pop ballad. No one in indie-world is repping for stuff like that even now. What got indie kids into a song like "Are You That Somebody" is that a) the beat was not straight-forward (like whatever IDM acts they were then listening to) and b) dude sampled a baby crying (like Beck or Cornelius or Cibo Matto).
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago)
Where's the evidence that indie kids like songs because they admire what the producer's doing? Just curious.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
Really, Alfred? "Unbreak My Heart"? I mean, that's a pretty standard-issue Diane Warren/David Foster pop ballad. No one in indie-world is repping for stuff like that even now
I was going to pair this with "We Belong Together," which did much to make Carey credible with the kids (to me they're both good ballads; I can't hear what makes one more sonically adventurous or whatever).
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
I seriously doubt that indie-sters loved "Crazy in Love" because Rich Harrison produced it.
I have a theory that a star like Beyonce was omnipresent, thanks to the internets, in ways that even the likes of Madonna wasn't in HER heyday, so resisting the power of a "Crazy in Love" is pointless, but I won't go into it here.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
Since our inception in 1995, we've focused primarily on covering indie music, but over the past few years, we've found ourselves liking a fair bit more pop music. One reason for this might be that hip-hop has all but taken over the charts; another is that the recent prominence of several major innovators (Timbaland, Neptunes, Kanye West, Just Blaze, SK1, Swizz Beats, etc etc etc) has forced competition amongst producers. And that's not only given the sound of the music a complete overhaul, but caused them all to keep fresh, lest they fall out of demand with artists. In short, we feel like there's some overlooked value on the pop charts right now, and we're not feeling much of a need to discriminate-- if the shit's good, it's good.--Ryan Schreiber, August 2003
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
It was easier to ignore even a massive hit like "Vogue" because it wasn't shoved into your earhole as a ringtone, YouTube clip, etc.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Rockists! (xpost)
vulva eyes? for some reason I find this phrase disturbing
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
And if YOU do, imagine me.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
sarahel, I agree with you about arm-folding, but the idea was somehow so often used back then that it seemed an appropriate shorthand for that complaint
oh, totally ... this local noise board I'm on had this clusterfuckish thread a while back when someone complained about arm-folding at noise shows. He was a total troll, but it still elicited a response.
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
Crazy in Love is kinda post-tipping point though, Crazy in Love sounds v. Neptunesy and I remember indie magazines doing Neptunes profiles at the time, which is a very post Timbaland thing. I mean I don't really know what most of the big pop producers of the 90's looked like, but now we're in a position where Like terius and tricky and rich harrison are able to start their own vanity-girl groups, which to me has these echos of Timbaland and Aaliyah and I definitely think that a precedent was set on at least that front.
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
also stuff like Black Dice's first full length coming out on DFA, and other labels like Warp that were very identified with a very particular strain or scene picking up acts like Broadcast and Grizzly Bear. (I think ppl looking up Label's websites for music clips was a big thing a few years ago and there was a definite peak in label awareness a few years ago, indie labels like Domino getting very eclectic with stuff like Four Tet as well as the Kills/RTX)
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
I have a theory that a star like Beyonce was omnipresent, thanks to the internets, in ways that even the likes of Madonna wasn't in HER heyday
Beyonce may be more omnipresent (if such a thing is possible) than Madonna, but Madonna captured much more of the public imagination in her heyday, precisely because there was no internet. Unlike today, people didn't have infinite options, thousands of blogs promoting micro-genres, hyper short attention-spans and severely splintered fanbases. Not sure that takes anything away from your broader point. Just sayin'.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel otm
― new clusterfuck thread will eventually provide me a funny display name (sarahel), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think that they knew who Rich Harrison was, but I do think that a big part of why indie kids dug it was the big horn-driven soul sample; for as much they ignored a fair amount of contemporary mainstream R&B, they always liked old James Brown and Jackson Five songs.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
I don't disagree! But it was easier to tune her out -- that's the paradox. I had plenty of friends in high school and college who had no interest in Madonna and, because they neither watched MTV nor listened to Top 40 radio, heard not a note.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
there was also an early decade self-conscious shuffle-ad eclecticism of liking x AND y, whereby two supposedly conflicting elements of ppls taste implied quirkiness or something (hi dere mashups)
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
Nabisco, how much of indie's popularization do you think was just part of the larger social trend of everybody trying to find and show-off their own niches and quirks? You were touching on it a bit in the article, and I think its worth further thought (maybe in a future piece), is the fact that indie music was part of the larger explosion of a class of people all looking to find and showcase their social status. From Starbucks culture to the Us v. Them Mac ads to, eventually, the "status update" and social networking et al, indie rock seemed to be an accessory to the much larger trend of trendiness.
x-post daniel otm
― Cunga, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
I'm dancing around it, so I'll just say it: I'm partially reacting to the implication that pop music was suddenly so glorious and producer-driven in the early noughties that Pitchfork just had to sit still and wait so that the marketplace adjusted to IT. I know no one has said this, but that's my suspicion.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
i think that led to a reaction against indie where the pick and choose eclecticism that indie seemingly had, now just seemed to take from every other genre and homogenise it with its indieness
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
I just can't think of any producer more than Timbaland who RIGHT FROM THE START made themselves so visible and I think that that definitely was a turning point.
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
Cunga's otm too.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
maybe it wasn't the music itself but the narrative definitely changed and I think its a bit much to suggest that the internet suddenly meant that ppl heard to 40 stuff
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
I just had flashbacks to Christgau at 2008's EMP Conference -- "I miss the monoculture"(rueful headshake).
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
there was a definite peak in label awareness a few years ago
Huh, I would've said this was bigger before this decade -- pre-Internet, one of the easiest ways to filter all the music out there was to get into a particular label, like a Matador or a Kill Rock Stars, and trust that most of what they put out would be pretty good. Now that's obviously not as necessary, and I'd wager that one reason you have a band like Grizzly Bear on Warp is precisely because labels are no longer invested in maintaining a distinct genre-specific identity.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
That's true.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
that's probably a case of reading my own viewpoint into this, I kinda read the ipodclectecism thing into GB being on Warp, like "hey, we only like super difficult electronic stuff and we get why this indie band is great so there must be something else going on" (this is what I get a little out of the dubstep dropping around the xx too)
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
That Schreiber piece is a good example, because it's basically him explaining/defending/justifying to an indie audience why a certain type of pop music is worth paying attention to -- if I remember correctly, he also compares "What About Us" to Bjork, which I think gets at what Jaymc is saying. This was a few years into a period where "pop" -- which indie types had previously written off as bland and toothless -- was pretty thoroughly replaced with a form of hip-hop/r&b whose production could be appreciated in a way not so different from listening to IDM records. (Hence the comparison to Bjork, who paired the same kind of thing with vocals.) So yeah, I do think the production was a first draw for plenty of indie types who much more gradually got into the vocal elements, or the different ways to think/talk critically about pop stars, etc. (Another reference point here that's kinda interesting is the first Prefuse 73 record, which got a lot of notice in "indie" circles and was 100% about an auteurish IDMish producer type controlling hip-hop/r&b sounds; interesting because you could listen to Timbaland tracks in similar ways, if you were so inclined.)
One thing I probably should have gotten into in the article is that the idea of mainstream/monoculture has been somewhat splintered (partly because of the internet) during a period where "indie" as a super-flexible category has kinda coalesced even further in certain ways (partly because of the internet). And also that the kind of "discernment" that used to go into finding/liking indie stuff is now a bigger and bigger part of how just anyone finds things to like among all those splintered options.
xpost - yes, exactly, Cunga, totally!
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
Good article on indie music, BTW. Pitchfork's "decade-in-music" series has been very, very good.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
wow was wondering how long it would take someone of prominence to just come out and say this
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
if I remember correctly, he also compares "What About Us" to Bjork
Yes, and (I just noticed this) "Cry Me a River" to DJ Shadow. Not sure whether that was before or after Alex Ross in the New Yorker called it the most polyphonic pop song in history.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
(Ross obviously approaching it from a slightly different perspective, i.e., here's why CLASSICAL fans should care about pop music.)
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
And was also a total snot about it -- what was that line about Timberlake probably not owning a pen?
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
Actually, backlash to that article -- in Slate and elsewhere -- epitomized how many walls were tumbling in 2003.
― vulva eyes (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
I'd like to think that SFJ's Slate response basically won him the job at the New Yorker, since it demonstrated how insufficient it was for the magazine to rely on its classical critic and on Nick Hornby to write about pop music.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
Puff Daddy surely (dunno if Dre counts)
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
that wasn't pop tho
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
in what world is Puffy not pop
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
Spice- ?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
think Combs became successful and mainstream enough to be able to redefine pop and occupy its territory as much as Timbaland did later, not just by taking hits from the 80s. plus he was more of a pop performer than Timba, what with the dancing background. that shit with Jimmy Page and Foo Fighters tho, yeeow.
― unban dictionary (blueski), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
How much of indie's embrace of pop music has been a result of the rise of popism among music critics in the late 90s/early 00s? It seemed like the argument over rockism/popism was everywhere, and critics were talking about a golden age of pop music as early as 1997 or 1998. I don't remember Pitchfork in its earliest incarnation embracing teen-pop (or teen culture), but statements like Ryan Schreiber's seem indicative of a general shift in music criticism that had become prevalent by the early part of the decade. I also think Pitchfork's rising status as a music taste-maker has been one of the defining stories of the decade, and wonder how much of the news coming out of that site and the discussion that surrounded it actually contributed to creating a zeitgeist.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
i like everything said here, but "all those splintered options" is something i'm growing more and more skeptical of as time goes on. the indie/blog world might have at first seemed like it was coming from all sorts of directions, with an unprecedented amount of styles covered by different blogs and places, but it occured to me while reading end-of-the-year lists at a bunch of blogs i frequent that by and large everybody listens to the same albums. there's some variation of course; the odd outlier, a hip hop blog here and there, but if things are going to coalesce any time soon it would be nice if they splintered a bit more first. seems things didn't splinter so much as split.
― samosa gibreel, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:30 (fifteen years ago)
nah I think the fact that you can easily find a blog about any given micro-niche-subgenre is indicative of the splintering, it just depends on what you pay attention to. Personally I'm something of a magpie and am happy to dip in and out of psych rock blogs or dub blogs or hip hop or Pitchfork or Arthur or whatever. Its all out there. And it is an incredibly striking contrast to my (and I presume Nabisco's) youth when you really had to make an effort to kind of connect the dots about various scenes and actually hunt down specific types of bands/music.
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:36 (fifteen years ago)
― jaymc, Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:25 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yeah "Crazy In Love" really came out at the height of super-producer-mania that was in some ways one of the few big songs that wasn't by an established producer -- I'd loved the Kelly Rowland and Amerie singles he did the year before but I didn't really know his name or know who he was until "Crazy In Love." In fact, I remember when it first came out someone on ILM was all "oh this must be Kanye" and it drove me up the wall that like 3 different times Ryan from Pitchfork credited Scott Storch as the producer of the song, it was almost like people couldn't deal with the beat being done by a (relatively) unknown producer.
― --nicci mane (some dude), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
― plax (I know, right?), Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:17 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is full of crazy, btw. "Crazy In Love" sounds like what the Neptunes were doing at the time, like, even remotely? Aaliyah was a vanity project for Timbaland and not the established act that helped make him a big deal?
― --nicci mane (some dude), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:40 (fifteen years ago)
this whole talk of producers becoming superstars in the pop world seems like a follow-on from hip hop, which was the genre where I first really started paying attention to who produced what in the late 80s/early 90s. It wasn't until rap ate hip-hop that this phenomenon of the producer-as-star became mainstream.
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:48 (fifteen years ago)
I mean in the early 90s I would totally snap up anything that had Prince Paul or Sir Jinx/DJ Pooh/Ice Cube or Premier's name on it
― Hat Trick Swayze (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 September 2009 23:49 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah but indie ppl are big on Spector and Meek too; producer-as-auteur is a very rock-geek thing. So it's a helpful screen through which to view/hear other stuff too.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Thursday, 17 September 2009 00:46 (fifteen years ago)
^^^^^^^^
― Cunga, Thursday, 17 September 2009 00:54 (fifteen years ago)
I wrote a lot of boring stuff on the Electrik Red thread about my own sense of how/why "indie" kids got into R&B so much, with the whole love affair peaking in 2003 and slowly dropping off since then.
To my mind it was a partly about "interesting sounds" geekery, but also a lot about (as I think jaymc mentioning upthread) people being able to reconnect the Neptunes/Harrison/Timbaland circa 2002 sound to the popular soul and funk they liked, and also their own ideas of "golden age" hip hop. Everyone I knew at university owned the first Jurassic 5 album, though mostly not the EP; everyone idolised Public Enemy and De La Soul and they were belatedly catching onto Outkast and had very little idea about any other Southern rap whatsoever. In 2001 a guy I knew was DISGUSTED that I had made Ja Rule's "Living It Up" single of the week in my local paper; within 2 years he was dancing to Snoop's "Beautiful" and Missy's "Work It" and, of course, "Crazy In Love", which was definitely the great unifier of that time in a way that surpassed even "Hey Ya" - I certainly still here it more at parties.
It was interesting to me to note which singles were just incomprehensibly big amongst these types. This guy I worked with who listened to Radiohead and then a lot of folky kinda stuff came in to work one day enthusing about "Milkshake", he couldn't stop singing it. Then of course he fell in love with "Hey Ya", but it was his "Milkshake" obsession that surprised me more.
In comparison to that, I think the "oh wow this Timbaland production sounds like Mouse on Mars" thing was an earlier and much smaller-impact phenomenon, if only because, well, how many indie types even were that into Mouse on Mars?
― Tim F, Thursday, 17 September 2009 05:39 (fifteen years ago)
Nabisco, I thought your piece seeded things well - appropriately "up" in tone and energy at the start, which is warranted for a subject with no clear answers and an impossibly over-invested audience - but you retreat into equivocal/rhetorical observance, and that (always drives me nuts but who cares) excuses you from having to really say anything. E.g. "I'm not here to make predictions." You have the tools and the knowledge to make predictions, editorialize, invest yourself, even direct dialog, yet shy away from any clear stance. Loved the second graf and the sophisticated boom-boom one (*ahem*), but I want more life, fucker.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 17 September 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
some italicized profanity, at least
― da croupier, Thursday, 17 September 2009 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
― --nicci mane (some dude), Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:40 AM (15 hours ago)
I should clarify because what I said comes across as more retarded than what I meant, I think that the producer vanity project does seem to echo a lot of the sentiment espoused by Timbaland at the time about Aaliyah being a "probe" or whatever. I'd be the first person to disagree that this is actually how it worked at the time, but I get the feeling that the producer/singer relationship he was describing is definitely one that Rich Harrison was trying to get at with Rich Girls (I mean, he called them after himself). Also I think those sweaty over stuffed retro-futuristic Neptunes sounds were definitely a precedent for Crazy in Love (but yeah, Kanye and Scott Storch moreso)
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't really notice Crazy in Love being this big epoch defining thing, mainly because I liked Work It Out way more and Crazy In Love just sounded like watered down version to my ears (this is probably why I'm overciting the Neptunes as an influence on CIL as well)
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
by the way as someone who was concurrently listening to Black Dice, Prefuse 73, the Books and top 40 RnB/Pop, jaymc is consistently hitting the button on the head for me, and I think around 2003-4 I was prime Pitchfork real-estate so... (I didn't have the internet at the time tho..)
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno...in 2003 the Neptunes were just starting to flirt with horns and more overtly 'live'-sounding production, but it was still a pretty far cry from the big brassy sample-driven style of "Crazy In Love" -- I mean, compare it to the Beyonce single they did a year before, "Work It Out," which is technically kind of a retro funk/soul thing but is still so stiff and wonky and thoroughly Neptunes, in some ways worlds away from "Crazy." Funny thing is, Kelis was probably as much or more a 'puppet' of her producers -- in terms of who wrote the songs and all the lyrics on her early records -- as Electrik Red or Rich Girl, but she stamped enough of an identity on it that most people never really looked at her that way.
xpost ha
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
xpost Yeah, more than six years later, I'm still trying to figure out how much of my own suddenly revived interest in Top 40 in early 2003 was because my tastes were naturally widening as I got older (i.e., I no longer felt compelled to define my musical identity as narrowly as I had in college), how much was because I happened to discover ILM that year (and encountered surprisingly intelligent defenses of pop), and how much was because of all this general sociocultural stuff we've been talking about.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)
I just want to clarify that I don't think Kelis is more or less a puppet than the Rich Girls either, just that the terms of the narrative seem derived from some of what Timbaland was saying a few years ago wrt Aaliyah which would also appeal to indie fans as has been pointed out because it does echo the whole Brill Building production lines of sixties pop that are basically indie pop's old testament.
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
The dynamic I find interesting here is the one nabisco singles out: a return to pop as a reaction to the "niceness" of mainstream indie. There's a lot wrapped up in that, including racial stuff of the typical kind in the history of pop music (r&b as "other" and hence "rebellious"). But it's not just that: nabisco rightly points out that it's not just pop that's contrasted with the "nice" indie, but also the noisier indies. And that's interesting because it was this was in the early 90s too, though even then the noisier indie had niceness at its core in a way that the newer noises don't seem to. I'm thinking of Superchunk and Dinosaur Jr. which were arguably folk rock bands who could still rock the fuck out in a way that the Byrds never pulled off; of the fact that Smashing Pumpkins got just as much play on Headbanger's Ball than 120 Minutes in the Gish era at least, but still covered Fleetwood Mac.
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
I'm thinking of Superchunk and Dinosaur Jr. which were arguably folk rock bands who could still rock the fuck out in a way that the Byrds never pulled off;
what??? dude neither of these two bands are "arguably" a folk rock band.
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
In fairness, anything can "arguably" be anything else as long as your argue strenuously enough; accuracy has nothing to do with it.
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:11 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but both translate surprisingly well to acoustic mode, which i guess counts for something? (xpost)
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:11 (fifteen years ago)
hmmm. yeah, but i'm trying to think of any band that plays electric guitars who if they played their songs on acoustic guitar wouldn't translate well? a good song is a good song
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
MBV? (lol)
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
well my emphasis was on the "surprisingly well" part, don't think i would've been into the idea of Superchunk acoustic versions or J Masic solo acoustic stuff until i actually heard and enjoyed them
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
in response to this, everyone can look forward to this afternoon, when i shall start a thread suggesting that Justice Scalia is really a woman under those robes
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
"All music is folk music. I ain't never heard a horse sing a song."
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
Louis Armstrong never heard Animal Collective, did he?
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
I think that stuff like MIA, Gang Gang Dance, Dirty Projectors and Discovery are definitely the product of the 2003 crossovers. I read an interview with the guy from Discovery where he talks about how when he went to college, everyone in his dorm had subwoofers and you just had this real novelty with big basslines, it was also with you know, napster that ppl didn't have to pay for big pop singles which a lot of ppl would have thought beneath them, but that doesn't mean they couldn't blast Justified in their dorm rooms (I used to go to an indie club in college that still plays Ignition remix every night).
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
Like, I know that that Crazy in Love thing was pretty short lived as indie's love affair with the mainstream, but its influence has definitely lived on and introduced a lot of sounds into indie music that might not have crossed over otherwise.
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
"Crazy In Love" was probably just the apex of Beyonce happening to have a huge huge impossible to ignore career, though. Even Pitchfork reviewed The Writing's On The Wall years before that!
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
I just can't see that particular song "introducing a lot of sounds into indie music," or into anything really, though. It's just an uptempo R&B song with driving percussion and horn blasts! There have been dozens of hit songs like that for decades!
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
That was also the same year as Justified which was making a lot of indie magazine's top ten lists and also 2003 was the year of Sound of the Underground which got a lot of cred on this side of the pond and Girls Aloud seemed to make their manufacturedness seem subversive, also Slave 4 U and Dirrty in the preceding two years meant that the three disney club members were getting all growed up and adult and it seemed to make pop this dirty tarnished thing for adults as well (also, pop wasn't just stealing producers from the hip hop world but also some of its music video imagery)
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:25 PM (51 seconds ago)
I just meant, that that moment of awareness kindof made it more acceptable to cop some moves from the mainstream
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah there was definitely some degree sea change right at that moment -- I'd loved the R&B-leaning songs on the last 'N Sync album and was really anticipating Justin's solo stuff, but when he showed up on the '02 VMA's doing "Like I Love You," all my college friends I was watching it with were kind of mocking him and snorting derisively; a year later I was at a party with most of the same people and we were all listening to Justified and loving it.
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
well i was snorting derisively because of his usher-urkel dance moves
― da croupier, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
in the context of where R&B had been prior to 2003, and why it had garnered critical plaudits for YEARS before that, "crazy in love" was not notable for its production at all: R&B had had so much written about how hyperfuturistic and cybermodern blah blah blah it all was, and smack in the middle of this comes this unashamedly retro blast which seemed more designed to imprint beyoncé's personality & pipes on the public. this is in contrast to songs like "addictive", "oops (oh my)", "what about us?" etc - obv i think truth hurts, tweet and brandy are all unique and distinctive artists in their own right, it was very easy for non-r&b fans to dismiss them as anono-divas (and certainly in the case of tweet and truth hurts, their career bore this out).
― lex pretend, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
the way Justified was received as this proper album was funny especially as looking back now it seems really patchy.
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I mean -- I felt embarrassed for the guy, it was not a very good debut performance for the song or his solo career. But I was rooting for him, my friends weren't. (xpost)
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
i loved all of justin's singles from the off, pretty much, but the moment i was completely won over was when this emerged:
http://i.rollingstone.com/assets/rs/11/3861/images/00316226_lg.jpg
― lex pretend, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
i'm coming into this late... are we trying to pinpoint when indie kids started listening to pop music?
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
At the time, Saturday morning kids pop shows like CD:UK and Popworld suddenly became cool to like and responded by getting edgier.
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
xpost, yes
waaaaay xp on the folk rock thing: come on, it's not a stretch to say that those two bands at least were folk rock bands; but probably we're just quibbling about what counts as folk rock. A lot of even early Superchunk songs have acoustic parts. And lots of Dinosaur songs do too. And that's in addition to the point made above that their songs translated well to just plain acoustic arrangements. Like even in the early-ish days I think Superchunk regularly finished off with acoustic songs live (I remember them ending one show with Mac on drums and Laura on acoustic for a 10 minute folk rock jam, on the On the Mouth tour ).
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure I linked to this upthread, but Pitchfork's P2k: The Decade in Music
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, i think serious record nerds ALWAYS have had a contrarian pop streak, and the real sea change is that google and file sharing make everyone think they're a record nerd.
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, I mean:Was 2003 really the year that pop "broke"?
I remember that show Austin Stories in the 90s had a bit about one record nerd defending his love of the Spice Girls
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
totally agree with this
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
it probably started when that guy from the meat puppets bought the Jacksons' Triumph and blew Henry Rollins' mind
― da croupier, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
Like even in the early-ish days I think Superchunk regularly finished off with acoustic songs live (I remember them ending one show with Mac on drums and Laura on acoustic for a 10 minute folk rock jam, on the On the Mouth tour ).
weird. yeah i guess we have really different definitions of what folk rock is. i've never heard of them ending a show during that era w/acoustic guitars
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
And while THIS PARTICULAR batch of indieLOL pitchfuck strawmen may not of latched on to Backstreet Boys and LFO, as soon as Madonna's Mirwais shit, NSYNC's "Pop" Britney's "Toxic," Timbland/Neptunes, etc started sounding like weird Warp Records stuff by coincidence or design, I remember it not being that much of a stretch to hop on board. And that was way before 2003.
But that just may be a reflection of my previous statement
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
remember when filesharing took an arduous amount of time? I wonder if that also contributed, now everybody has obscure connoiseur pop taste "hello Echo, Cassie, Electrik Red"
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
one of my favorite parts of the Ewing essay is when he touches on how in the 90's stuff like Hanson and Quad City DJ's topped the Pazz & Jop singles poll, stuff that was just plain old popular pop music, and felt a lot less like it went through a rock-critic-friendly-pop filter than the singles polls since 2003.
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
everybody xpost
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
yeahhhhhh
http://myplay.com/files/video_stills/bsb_everybody.jpg
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
I kinda think all guitar-based music is either folk rock or metal, so yeah, I think we probably have really different definitions of folk rock.
But even if we skip the folk rock bit: like, go with the Jesus Lizard or Tad or the Butthole Surfers: lots of the noisier indie in the early 90s was still pretty classic rock (I say folk rock) based and hence nice, as in friendly to your parents, not that far out. But when I listen to like Black Dice or Lightning Bolt there's something else going on, I guess more, uh, arty?
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
oh man i forgot how corey feldman this was
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHbPZwP8RLg
― da croupier, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
go with the Jesus Lizard or Tad or the Butthole Surfers: lots of the noisier indie in the early 90s was still pretty classic rock (I say folk rock) based and hence nice, as in friendly to your parents, not that far out.
i think we have really different defintions of "parents" here--like i don't think any of this stuff would be well received by my parents!
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting that this was about the same time as bootlegs which wer also the product of filesharing getting ppl access to destiny's child a cappellas etc. meant that the credibility of pop and indie rubbed off on each other a little bit (I remember Kylie doing Can't get you out of my head as the New Order mashup at some awards show)
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
xp, my mam likes La Roux!
haha yeah probably re. parents: my parents were cool with anything save hip hop or r&b (for the reasons you'd expect, though they'd never own up to it), hence my comment earlier about race.
― wacky spelling error (Euler), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
Chris Kirkpatrick - Reality TV starJoey FatOne - Broadway, Dancing With The StarsLance Bass - Broadway, Dancing With The StarsJC Chasez - ?!?!?!
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
he's a judge on randy jackson's dance crew
― da croupier, Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
JC chasez was on a Basement Jaxx song in 2003
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
???? another vice???
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:04 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, weren't Ned and Dan united in 2003 by preferring JC Chasez over Justin Timberlake?
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
(Not to suggest that they weren't already united over many other things.)
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
I liked him on Dirty Pop way more
― plax (I know, right?), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
Justin had stupid cauliflower hair
I still like JC's songs from that era more than Justin's.
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
presented without comment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmwB9ZwItz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6i0V9OWo0s
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
you missed one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQdYbkbFvA8
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
the hot 100 missed that one too
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
sometimes i wonder if might like those songs if i didn't know what dude looked like.
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
It's my fave, though, and that is pretty much what I care about.
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
i feel like he should be trying to sell me knock-off gold chains at a boardwalk stall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv-2XYOtgCg
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
always thought "shake it" was the pick of chasez' album
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4F_lQ-W2cg
no way is justin not preferable though
― lex pretend, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
i like to imagine that in 40 years JC partisans will be roaming the scorched earth, still muttering "Justin's overrated" and "it's pronounced sha-zay"
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
HE WAS ON A BASEMENT JAXX SONG
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:34 (fifteen years ago)
http://intertubes.info/downloads/images/motivation/strawman.jpg
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:36 (fifteen years ago)
haha dan i don't give any more of a fuck if you prefer j.c. to justin now than i did in 2003
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
the simple fact that i can say that makes me weep for my twenties.
― so says i tranny ben franklin (HI DERE), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
"i backpacked around europe and spent a few years in africa doing aids-related charity work.""i was dismissive of a grown man preference in pop stars"
― strongohulkingtonsghost, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
would enjoy mocking, but...cassie fan club :(
― lex pretend, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
i'm sure they'll let you keep that Connecticut Fever Demos 08 CD-r in the old folks' home
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
Ha, I don't know that "Crazy in Love" is all that central, but if you ask me, I would say (a) it came just a touch after the "indie" audience had warmed up toward the idea of liking pop, (b) it was really good and attention-capturing and (significantly) aggressive enough for rock types to dig without complication, partly because (c) like lots of people said, it's built on types of drums and horn sounds that are common to rock, too.
OTT: Thanks, honestly, that literally means a lot coming from you. It's true -- it felt more appropriate for me to just lay out the issue rather than take a stance on it. I'm over 30 and I'm a "critic" and that means I can just magpie around and pick up on whatever seems well-done or resonates with me, without quite so much of the sides-taking identity-based preference stuff. (My only real indie desire is to hear as much stuff as possible that's poppy and deeply weird at the same time, especially in terms of people's voices.) So I don't know that my personal sides-taking is important, but I do think it'd be awesome if reading that piece sensitized anyone else to the sides-taking or, like, hastened anyone's desire to make something shift.
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
stop saying magpie
― umaad wasif (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
btw re: Superchunk, I always find them a great example of the shift across the 90s, especially since they always seem like such a right-in-the-middle definition-of-indierock band -- toward the start of the decade they were all "Slack MF" throat-shreddy and whatnot, and toward the end they were more of a modern indie band rolling out the vibraphones for backing tracks, right? I think it's true that somewhere in the middle there was this point where the average popular indie-type band was going to be more of a rock band, with some fuzz or punk to it, and since then the most popular indie-type bands have tended to be more just pop, or sorta orchestral, or softly psychedelic, etc.
Also -- speaking of 2003! -- I just realized that I wrote this in a review back then:
Producer Dave Fridmann has built his name on highly successful, invigorating experiments in pop classicism which revel in the same swooning orchestration that rock music all but abandoned after the 1970s. But it seems every year, he's got another up his sleeve, never much different than the last, and with repeated exposure to these kinds of grandiose epics, the newness has worn off, leaving many of his productions to join their cousins Wilco and Elliott Smith in a genre I describe as, well, indie adult-contemporary. ... Don't take offense yet-- I think indie adult-contemporary is a fine idea, and I've loved far too many of these records to get snobby about it. It's just a fact: This is the music that may eventually prompt your preteen kids to roll their eyes and make unenthusiastic noises when you force them to listen during long car trips. Jeff Tweedy may become your Sting, Wayne Coyne your Peter Gabriel, Mercury Rev your Steely Dan-- and there's no reason any of this will be any less wonderful than the Carole King LPs in your parents basements. But at some point, I realized my shelves were filling up with this stuff, and even though I knew I'd find every new release of it perfectly lovely, it seemed more rewarding to look into something else.
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
(xpost - haha Whiney, I can never read the phrase "stop saying X" without hearing it in the voice of this kid with Down Syndrome yelling "stop saying BOO" at some friends at a volleyball game in college, so thanks for the memories)
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
didn't think it was possible to be that polite while comparing someone to a retard
― cee-u-en-tee (some dude), Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
aww no! :( -- plus keep in mind that in this instance the kid was correct
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
I always find them a great example of the shift across the 90s, especially since they always seem like such a right-in-the-middle definition-of-indierock band -- toward the start of the decade they were all "Slack MF" throat-shreddy and whatnot, and toward the end they were more of a modern indie band rolling out the vibraphones for backing tracks, right?
Heh, the only Superchunk album I own is Come Pick Me Up (1999), which is fantastic but I've long suspected not to be entirely representative of their earlier, more critically acclaimed stuff, which is why I've never bothered seeking it out.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
it sounds pretty much like all of their other stuff, except the tempos are maybe a little slower? more restrained? but not really. it's not like there are *huge* gaps in their sound from record to record.
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:11 (fifteen years ago)
i'd say the biggest gap is between On the Mouth and Foolish
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:12 (fifteen years ago)
more critically acclaimed stuff
geez, there's that phrase again ;)
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
I love Superchunk's later sometimes lighter stuff, especially Come Pick Me Up, maybe more than the earlier records. Here's Where The Strings Come In is like the best of both worlds for me, though.
― some dude, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah? I just remember reviews of Come Pick Me Up being like "no, here's really where the strings come in," and if you look at the personnel that played on the record, it's like a who's who of the late '90s Chicago post-rock scene. Or at least the jazz musicians (Ken Vandermark, Jeb Bishop, etc.) that always played on Gastr del Sol and Tortoise records. And O'Rourke produced it. So I guess I was like, "well, of course I love this."
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i would try Here's Where The Strings Come in next, maybe. i love that one and Come Pick Me Up a lot
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah...imo Superchunk are one of the best indie bands of their era precisely because they could make a jump in that direction without going too soft and still having awesome drumming and brisk tempos. Any other band doing a record w/ that supporting personnel probaly wouldn't do much for me. (xpost)
― some dude, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
Really half of my gripes about the last decade of indie rock could be summed up as me wishing there were more Jon Wursters around.
― some dude, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:20 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, easily one of my favorite drummers
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:20 (fifteen years ago)
btw.. the last song on the Japandroids album is really good. 'I Quit Girls'. It's the slow repetitive shoegazey song. I don't care for the other songs.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFD9WONu_ms
― beauty of grunge = abandon (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:23 (fifteen years ago)
they definitely made both work, and obviously their movement from thing to thing is gonna mostly be about them personally growing/changing -- but I think they did wind up moving alongside a bigger wave/trend on this one, from old-school indie/punky to, well, having a bunch of post-rock guys in. and the same with a lot of the post-rock guys in Chicago, too -- loads of them started off in late-80s or early-90s punk-type bands!
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:25 (fifteen years ago)
this is maybe the equivalent of how loads of the UK's early-90s post-rockers spent the late 80s in jangly/fuzzy indie or c-86 bands, and then felt like they needed to hop forward
― nabisco, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:29 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I mean, obviously Mac has his finger on the pulse of popular indie taste, whether intentionally or not, if you look at how well Merge has done the last ten years, probably just because he's a big record geek.
― some dude, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:29 (fifteen years ago)
they could make a jump in that direction without going too soft and still having awesome drumming and brisk tempos.
That's true. Actually, my favorite song from Come Pick Me Up is probably "June Showers," and that's all about the awesome bass riff.
― jaymc, Thursday, 17 September 2009 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
Looking forward to this week's countdown of the Top 200 albums of the decade.
The list of Nos. 200 -- 151 go up on Yom Kippur.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 03:30 (fifteen years ago)
Hope the administrator puts it up on a new page. My computer at work can't handle even 2000 posts, let alone 4000
― Dan S, Sunday, 27 September 2009 03:38 (fifteen years ago)
this list will be interesting since i don't feel like there's developed any consensus on even a shortlist of 'defining album of decade' candidates at this point. and i'm wondering if pitchfork's status now is such that the results of this list may actually play a strong hand in determining what albums from this decade will still be popular among musicnerds 10+ years from now. who knows.
i like these lists mainly because they're fun to mock and to argue over but also because they sometimes help me catch some good indie stuff that i missed over the course of the year (or years in this case)
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Sunday, 27 September 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
It's gonna be Kid A just as surely as it was gonna be "B.O.B."
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Sunday, 27 September 2009 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
Sneak Preview of the Pitchdork Top Ten:
1. Some OutKast Shit2. Some Radiohead Shit3. Some LCD Soundsystem Shit4. Some Radiohead Shit5. Some OutKast Shit6. Some Radiohead Shit7. Some Radiohead Shit8. Some OutKast Shit9. Some LCD Soundsystem Shit10. oh shit do we remember the strokes
― a light salad of Adorno, Heidegger, Derrida and Esteban Buttez (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 27 September 2009 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, probably it will be Kid A. Still should be an interesting list, especially if you're less concerned about what-places-where and more concerned about discovering stuff that may have escaped your attention and reading thoughts about what happened in music this decade, e.g., trends, new sounds and production methods, and so forth.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
hilarious and perceptive, kbp. stop by this thread more!
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 27 September 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
Not enough Radiohead predictions on his list, tho.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:03 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that is quite a conservative prediction on Radiohead's share in the top 10 KPB
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
KBP even
i agree placing isn't what it's all about, but it'd be nice if album of the decade wasn't kid a. album of the decade should be written by a band of the decade, and while i'm sure any pitchfork writer could wax elegant about how there is no definitive band of the decade, and everything is splintered and radiohead made the transition into the internet age and all that. it'd be just fine and nice but dreadfully predictable. i think they are in a position where they can really make a bold and interesting statement, they should seize the opportunity.
― samosa gibreel, Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, if there's one reason why kid a shouldnt be album of the decade, it's because you can't make the argument that radiohead was the band of the decade
― k3vin k., Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
Alright, so what album should it be then?
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
what's the maximum amount of posts that can be in one thread?
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:21 (fifteen years ago)
pfork's #1 is likely animal collective or somesuch, they've been high on those guys for the whole decade pretty much
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
It's gonna be Kid A just as surely as it was gonna be "B.O.B."― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:37 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:37 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Pfork has learned how to be contrarian and duck their own canon for talking points. Obvious choice Kid A is gonna be No. 2, Daft Punk's Discovery is gonna be No. 1. I'm callin it right now
― the swagona monologues (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
discovery does have a strong case going for it as an era-defining album, i wouldn't be surprised
i guess the question is are they doing this wholly by tabulation of individual writers lists like they do for their year-end lists or do they go in and manually rearrange the top 10-20 to suit the overall statement they want to make
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
Discovery sounds reasonable
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
xpostprobably the latter, like any publication on planet earth
― the swagona monologues (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
Discovery would be a great choice.
― Dan S, Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:00 (fifteen years ago)
Discover-the-album yes. Discovery-the-Vampire-Weekend-side-project no.
― Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
You can't? Kid A; Amnesiac; Hail To The Theif; In Rainbows.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:08 (fifteen years ago)
Besides, I don't see why the No. 1 album of the decade has to be made by a band of the decade.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
it shouldn't, but if the band made better albums in the '90s it doesn't speak very highly of this decade
― guccislamic deejihad (some dude), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:33 (fifteen years ago)
Normally I'd say that's true, but if the band in question was maybe/probably the band of the 90s, even falling off that level of quality wouldn't necessarily eliminate them from consideration as the band of the 00s.
I wouldn't say Radiohead is the band of this decade, anyway. But I think you could make a case for it.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:35 (fifteen years ago)
this sounds like a different thread
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
not to muck up this perfectly awesome one
Someone said Animal Collective was (from Pitchfork's perspective) the band of the decade. I can see that more than Radiohead: Many albums released this decade, all very well-received (at least by Pitchfork), a big progression in their sound, and a "cutting-edge" sound in terms of mashing-up genres and that noise-rock aesthetic. Feels right, tho I'm sure there are other good nominees.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
We should all take turns starting a "Radiohead: Band of the Decade?" thread once a day.
― Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:39 (fifteen years ago)
lol. It may sound like a different thread, WGW. I can't tell, since (a) I'm distracted by the motion I'm supposed to be writing and (b) my daughter just let-out a blood-curdling scream because Carly and Freddie are finally making goo-goo eyes at each other on iCarly.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:41 (fifteen years ago)
what's a motion?
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:43 (fifteen years ago)
Album of the decade: I GET WET
― Niles Caulder, Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:44 (fifteen years ago)
A motion is a written request asking the Court to take some action in a lawsuit.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:46 (fifteen years ago)
Are you suing iCarly?
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:50 (fifteen years ago)
He's suing PFM if they don't make Kid A album of the decade.
― Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:50 (fifteen years ago)
It does seem like Animal Collective was the most hyped/praised band on Pitchfork over the last decade, but it's hard to imagine which AC-related project could be named album of the decade.
― Dan S, Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:51 (fifteen years ago)
LOL! No. My wife and daughter just caught the end of the show. I'm working in the other room.
But I will stop soon to catch up on this shocking development on iCarly!
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:51 (fifteen years ago)
If there was a legal action for bad scriptwriting, I would sue iCarly. I have standing.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:52 (fifteen years ago)
it's hard to imagine which AC-related project could be named album of the decade.
MPP, given the rating. Working against it: It's too new.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:53 (fifteen years ago)
(Also possible: Person Pitch).
I have a broad list of potential grievances, this among them.
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:54 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, they're not going to name a 2009 album the album of the decade. person pitch doesn't seem like a grand-statement kind of album, so it's hard to imagine that, too
― Dan S, Sunday, 27 September 2009 23:55 (fifteen years ago)
Agreed. I'm more interested in Nos. 200 -- 50 anyway. More opportunity to broaden my horizons.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 00:00 (fifteen years ago)
I like Kala as, if not for sure #1, top 10 material. If it wasn't decade defining necessarily, it's pretty decade-encapsulating
― een, Monday, 28 September 2009 00:04 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, KALA's in contention for No. 1, I think. I'd rank it above the Animal Collective albums (most of which I like a lot).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 00:12 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel, ESq. The HR deparment of Pitchfork wanted me to inform you that Kid A will not receive the #1 spot. You've failed to realize that some of the pitchfork writers are also writers of the popular nickelodeon show iCarly and they were quite livid over your comment about "bad scriptwriting" (throwing banannas and shit). Needless to say 'Kid A' has been removed from the drawing hat and you have been quietly asked to not partake in the Pitchfork scene anymore.
― beauty of grunge = abandon (CaptainLorax), Monday, 28 September 2009 01:01 (fifteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, September 27, 2009 8:12 PM (1 hour ago)
i could not be more certain than i am right now that at least one AC project will beat kala, probably 2
― k3vin k., Monday, 28 September 2009 01:41 (fifteen years ago)
You've failed to realize that some of the pitchfork writers are also writers of the popular nickelodeon show iCarly and they were quite livid over your comment about "bad scriptwriting" (throwing banannas and shit). Needless to say 'Kid A' has been removed from the drawing hat and you have been quietly asked to not partake in the Pitchfork scene anymore.
Okay, but I stand by my iCarly comment. That writing is for s---t.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 01:46 (fifteen years ago)
I am intrigued, however, about how this whole Carly/Freddie/Sam romantic triangle will work out.
lol it is bad writing, almost everything is implausible, but it is my guilty pleasure (like lots of implausible things) and I too kinda care about the love triangle since they had a follow episode to Freddie and Sam's kiss and now they have Sam walking in on Freddie and Carly slow dancing at smoothie place.
― beauty of grunge = abandon (CaptainLorax), Monday, 28 September 2009 02:00 (fifteen years ago)
That is the new episode I am watching at this very second.
It's a very special moment in the Esq. household.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 02:05 (fifteen years ago)
(We only saw the last 30 seconds of the new episode when it debuted earlier this evening.)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 02:06 (fifteen years ago)
i think we've found a worse conversation than any possible conversation abt p4k.
― call all destroyer, Monday, 28 September 2009 02:11 (fifteen years ago)
lol O RLY?
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 02:15 (fifteen years ago)
not to be harshin on u guys i mean feel free to make an icarly thread that i will not open
― call all destroyer, Monday, 28 September 2009 02:16 (fifteen years ago)
lol. No worries, CAD. Was kidding in mentioning the show at all.
We'll be back to regularly scheduled programming now.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 02:20 (fifteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Monday, 28 September 2009 02:20 (fifteen years ago)
so it begins...
― Bee OK, Monday, 28 September 2009 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
does it? i can't see any list yet
― een, Monday, 28 September 2009 05:26 (fifteen years ago)
http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7706-the-top-200-albums-of-the-2000s-200-151/
― Bee OK, Monday, 28 September 2009 05:28 (fifteen years ago)
i respect marc hogan, i honestly do, he's written great shit about a ton of records i love and at the very worst i'll forever feel connected to him because of los campesinos stannery, but seriously what in all possible gods' name is this
On June 1, 2009, Air France Flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. All 228 people aboard died. It's difficult to ignore that tragic fact now when reflecting on-- or, honestly, Googling-- an Air France record called No Way Down, and I know I can't possibly begin to feel the pain of those victims' families.
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 05:41 (fifteen years ago)
after so many swimmers have been swept away by rough tides at beaches, how can i ever get into the new EP by Washed Out?
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
not to mention wavves
― electric sound of jim (original version) (electricsound), Monday, 28 September 2009 05:53 (fifteen years ago)
after so many mountain disasters, how can i ever again listen to that Avalanches album?
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 05:54 (fifteen years ago)
it's difficult to reflect on— or even Google— the record by Taken by Trees with the death of Sonny Bono so fresh in my mind
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 05:56 (fifteen years ago)
Jordan you have made my day.
― Tim F, Monday, 28 September 2009 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
i think he's right to point out that it's actually a pretty wistful/sad album, but seriously i laughed so hard when i read that blurb. what a fucking mess
― een, Monday, 28 September 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
lmaooooooooo
― deej, Monday, 28 September 2009 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
That time it took me 2 minutes and 55 seconds to locate Will2K in order to hit the "pause" button.
― billstevejim, Monday, 28 September 2009 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
tbh i keep looking @ various artists in this list & wondering on what planet it makes sense that "hmm, andrew bird released a better album than anything scarface has made in a decade..."
its a funny metric but i dont know, girl talk is better than the carter ii?
― deej, Monday, 28 September 2009 07:14 (fifteen years ago)
etc etc etc
wanted to get it out of the way before everyone's doing it i guess
nice of deej to discover the concept of a "list"
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 07:26 (fifteen years ago)
When they asked you to submit your top whatever list to compile this thing, did you just write "The Fix" and a smiley face?
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 07:27 (fifteen years ago)
no i gave them a precise & perfectly sequenced selection of incredible albums
― deej, Monday, 28 September 2009 07:29 (fifteen years ago)
what was your #1?
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 07:30 (fifteen years ago)
monster magnet - god says no
― deej, Monday, 28 September 2009 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
Is anyone else having problems with PFM pages not fully loading? I don't look at it regularly but several times over the last few weeks, most notably just now, trying to look at the 00s albums list, pages will only partially load. I'm on a Mac and have tried both Safari and Firefox.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 28 September 2009 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
Any way someone can put Will2K on repeat? Will -- of course the beat will also stop if ALL THE ELECTRICTY GOES OUT BECAUSE THERE IS CHAOS. Think this one through.
― dabug, Monday, 28 September 2009 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus Christ, don't some of you SLEEP?
― Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 September 2009 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
Wait, there are thousands of people who don't know what Grindin is about? Really?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
Is anyone else having problems with PFM pages not fully loading?
this happens to my gf i think
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
can't someone do something about fucking will smith on this thread?
― moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 September 2009 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
I thought "Grindin'" was about hoagies and grinders until Sean Fennessey's stunning revelation.
― guccislamic deejihad (some dude), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
I am a lil disappointed by Carter 2's placement only because it probably means one of his overrated mixtapes will be way higher.
i don't think i know what grindin is about specifically but i mean i could take a wild guess
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
i guess also what the fuck does it really matter?
yeah i mean...he says it like there's some deceptive metaphor going on, not just a euphemism used in 800 rap songs for "selling drugs" and in 800 other rap songs for "working hard at whatever you do, which may or may not be selling drugs"
― guccislamic deejihad (some dude), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
so 200-151 on the list have kind of a "really, this was it?" vibe to me
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
But at most, only two of them: "Please note that, in the interest of keeping the list broad, we capped the number of albums for any given artist at three." I see this glass as half-full. Regis Philbin has released two of the best discs of this decade; now I know both can place on P2k's list.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
Oh, I liked Nos. 200 -- 151. Lots of discs I didn't expect (e.g., that particular Boris disc).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
Only three albums per artist? Poor Amnesiac.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Yeah, I guess it will be the odd-disc out for Radiohead. What will be left-out for other artists? I mean, Animal Collective had Sung Tongs, Feels, MPP, and Strawberry Jam.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
i would lol if they made an exception for animal collective
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
i should clarify, there were plenty of records i liked in 200-151, and it was nice to see records i used to stan for (akuma) and still stan for (anything by the constantines) but i'd consider anything in there like a good, solid, record--not a classic. so i guess there are just fewer classic albums than i want or something.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
Another band that might be hurt by that policy, however unlikely: The Clientele (Suburban Light; The Violet Hour; Strange Geometry; God Save The Clientele (I guess the new one -- out in early October -- is being released too late to qualify for the P2k list; still, that's four well-received discs in play)).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel, I love you, and you are a valuable poster, but the Pfork fan fiction is getting a little o_O
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
Supreme, Pretty Toney and Fishscale right?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Okay, I hear you. Truthfully, I should be at services today, anyway. I am distracting myself from my guilt (and a horrible work project) by posting on ILX.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 28 September 2009 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
surely Hail to the Thief as the leper Radiohead album? Its reissue got an 8.6 while Amnesiac's got a 9.5.
I think we could have an all AnCo top ten if we're including EPs, come on Pitchfork, show some balls.
― Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
(Pitchfork, show some balls maybe not the best of phrases to come after talking about Pfork fan fiction. Or perhaps ever.)
― Akon/Family (Merdeyeux), Monday, 28 September 2009 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
I do fear for some bands who might be "hurt" by only getting 3 entries on a list of the best albums of the decade.
― some dude, Monday, 28 September 2009 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
Surprised to see Silent Alarm place as low as it did. Curious as to whether the album's reputation has suffered in the wake of its poorly received follow-ups, or if it was never as much of a consensus pick as I recall it being. Fully expect the other big guitar albums of the first half of the decade to place in the top 50 - Interpol, Strokes, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, etc.
Pleased to see that Black Sheep Boy has appreciated in the past five years (tho). After this list is done, I'll be curious to see the full 200 compared to their original rankings in their respective Best of the Year lists. Always interesting to note what albums and sounds have had lasting relevance vs. those that turned out to be passing curiosities.
― MTLiens (Alex in Montreal), Monday, 28 September 2009 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
If this was in the Air France blurb at one time, it's not anymore.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 28 September 2009 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
i cant get the page to load, can someone post 200-151?
― k3vin k., Monday, 28 September 2009 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
only 2 of my superfavorites in this chunk (tallahassee & black sheep boy), the rest all seems to be discs i like but dont love or are my 2nd favorite by the band
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Monday, 28 September 2009 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
so it's kinda meh so far but you can't really make any grand statements with #151-200 in a list i guess
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Monday, 28 September 2009 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
to everyone complaining about will smith: get one bookmark
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, September 28, 2009 10:31 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
i didn't see it in the blurb either. an ilx poster sent it to me on AIM but i guess it was deleted before i even got there? or the poster made it up to embarrass me.
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
way to ruin pitchfork J0rdan S
― Mr. Que, Monday, 28 September 2009 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
way to ruin an entire DECADE of music
they deleted it after realizing there are three blurbs that talk mainly about 9/11 in the top 100
― some dude, Monday, 28 September 2009 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
― guccislamic deejihad (some dude), Monday, September 28, 2009 9:22 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
i wasn't sure whether to be surprised at it even being on the list or at the fact that it placed pretty low. i remember back when it dropped it got a good review but it was kind of like a vanity review not unlike idk deej's review of quik & kurupt. i dont think it placed on the 06 list (came out too late in 05 right?) but i could see it picking up some critical steam for a list like this post-wayne renaissance. unless it was voted in exclusively by the rap writer voting block which i guess would be plausible considering the placement of the scarface record.
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
it is pretty funny that wayne of all people might have been hampered by the 'three album limit' rule. i would've guessed that c2 would be the one left out considering the placement of dedication 2/drought 3/c3 on their year end lists.
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Monday, 28 September 2009 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
a lot of the rap records that are on the list or will be on the list didn't get big reviews and/or year end list placement at the time, C2 is not at all unique or surprising in that respect. (xpost)
― some dude, Monday, 28 September 2009 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
i still think you're way off on predicting/fearing that C3 will be big on PF or anyone else's decade lists
― some dude, Monday, 28 September 2009 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
first Pitchfork, Now Uncut
in the new issue of Uncut magazine on sale this week: Uncut's 150 Greatest Albums Of The 21st Century. . .So Far
as indicated in their monthly new issue email: duplicated herehttp://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/splinters/message/105260
anyone seen the list yet?
1 down 149 to goapparently Smile is number 4 according to a quick google search
― djmartian, Monday, 28 September 2009 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
Like I said way up thread, 10 years ago Spin and RS had their 90s issues out in late summer/early fall, so that's not very surprising (though I think the UK mags waited until 2000 to run theirs)
― scottpl, Monday, 28 September 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm actively surprised Max Tundra didn't rank higher -- I thought there were at least 3-5 people on staff who'd have it up toward their top 10. I dunno, though, maybe it takes more than that to rank high!
― nabisco, Monday, 28 September 2009 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
That 'noise' thing....wow. Animal Collective is/ever was noise? They should have just called it 'lo-fi' or 'experimental' instead of noise. Hell, most of the acts they talk about are straight-up guitars-and-drums bands that just tend to have shitty recordings.
― Adam Bruneau, Monday, 28 September 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago)
Animal Collective was pretty noise
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lip9f0tyDU
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
I'm actively surprised Max Tundra didn't rank higher --
I was mostly just surprised you didn't write the blurb.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 28 September 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
k3vin k, the page won't open for me when I use internet explorer (not sure why) but opens fine with mozilla firefox
― Dan S, Monday, 28 September 2009 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
Daft Punk and Justice reveled in gloriously superficial properties of rock, the Aqua-Net and motivational platitudes. But Vitalic came first
Bzzzt.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Monday, 28 September 2009 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
I assume that's considering Daft Punk not to have dug in that direction until Human After All
― nabisco, Monday, 28 September 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
Or, well ... I don't know about that description or those reference points, but if you don't much care about DJ Hell or anything, I can definitely see thinking of those earlier Vitalic singles as the early missing link between new electro and mid-decade rock-bangers stuff, I guess?
― nabisco, Monday, 28 September 2009 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
haha it's flat-out wrong, Nabisco.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Monday, 28 September 2009 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
can't wait to see how this "posts very much in character" battle is gonna play out.
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
― deej, Monday, 28 September 2009 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/456/iyh13wq3.jpg
― omar little, Monday, 28 September 2009 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
I honestly don't know about "flat-out," Matos: Vitalic released "Poney" / "La Rock" in 2001, same year as Discovery, which had DP reveling in the gloriously superficial properties of, like, more AM pop than "rock," no?
― nabisco, Monday, 28 September 2009 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
He didn't say "did it first," he said "came first."
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Monday, 28 September 2009 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
http://s.mcstatic.com/thumb/2732617/0/4/directors_cut/0/1/funny_scenes_ep_1_austin_powers_hottub.jpgOr sometimes not at all...
― unban dance squad (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
color me confused now
― nabisco, Monday, 28 September 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
[Sizzling Inset Graph Proving Album Format is a Syncope]
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Monday, 28 September 2009 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
thanks for the new screen name, dogg
― Sitizen Syncope (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 September 2009 21:08 (fifteen years ago)
I read it literally, that Vitalic preceded Daft Punk chronologically. Your point is probably what he's trying to say, but it's misleadingly put.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Monday, 28 September 2009 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
Poor Armand Van Helden, no-one remembers "Little Black Spiders".
― Tim F, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:11 (fifteen years ago)
haha I've spent a decade trying to forget "Little Black Spiders"
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:15 (fifteen years ago)
True history of rock house:
"Rolling & Scratching"/"Rock'n'Roll" --> "Spin Spin Sugar (Armand Van Helden Remix)" --> "Alienz" --> "Yo-Yo"/"Don't Give Up" --> "Little Black Spiders" --> "Where's Your Head At" --> "I'm So Crazy" --> various Subliminal Records efforts --> "Shiny Disco Balls" --> populist electro-house (Deep Dish/Bodyrockers/Rogue Traders etc.)
― Tim F, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7707-the-top-200-albums-of-the-2000s-150-100/
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:05 (fifteen years ago)
Moby?!
― so, me dude (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:09 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney, I like your suggestion that "Discovery" will be named the album of the decade. I'm hoping you're right. One of the defining themes of the decade has been finding ways of conflating electronic/dance music with rock, and Daft Punk gave us the best example of that with "Discovery". Radiohead approaced it from a rock perspective and made a series of great albums, and as such, Kid A at least deserves a high placement. Daft Punk came to it from the side of electronic music and made, I think, one of the most perfect albums ever. I'm not sure how much influence they've had on other music, but that album is indisputably a masterpiece, imo.
― Dan S, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:17 (fifteen years ago)
ryan p4k's discovery review
― abanana, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:24 (fifteen years ago)
This is maybe my favourite album of the decade too, but these "defining themes of the decade" style justifications are really offputting i think.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
Top 25 predictions off the top of my head (no order):
Kid AThe BlueprintFuneralDiscoveryMerriweatherYankeeStankoniaBright LightsUntrueWhite Blood CellsPerson PitchSung TongsSound of SilverSilent ShoutKalaAgaetisSmileMadvillainyOriginal PirateCookie MountainIllinoisLate RegistrationSince I Left You
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
That's only 23... oh well.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:31 (fifteen years ago)
Tim, I was hoping you or someone else could better articulate why "Discoery" might be a great choice, and what might give it its place as the album of the decade.
― Dan S, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:34 (fifteen years ago)
Top 150-101 is posted now.
Surprises:
#149 Tough Alliance New Chance - didn't expect to see this at all#145 Fiery Furnaces Blueberry Boat - wasn't this top 2-3 the year it came out? much lower than expected#140 TVOTR Dear Science - low low low......... but i'll take it#129 The Streets A Grand Don't... - this was top 2-3 as well, wasn't it? great album, too low#117 Low Things We Lost... - very happy this is on the list#116 Michael Mayer Immer - likewise#102 The Mountain Goats Sunset Tree - was expecting this to land top 50 or so..... disappointing
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
Can't believe that Michael Mayer placed ahead of TVOTR. Awesome.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:38 (fifteen years ago)
"lightening in a bottle"
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
Wow, the Clipse mixtape ahead of Lord Willin, looks like we've got another 3-album-max group on the list.
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:57 (fifteen years ago)
is that mixtape really that good, btw? I remember having some of the mp3s but none really blew me away iirc.
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
It's a shame Clipse's legendary fourth album couldn't make it, Whitey! Have you ever heard it?
― so, me dude (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
I had forgotten how negative that Ryan Schreiber review of "Discovery" was
― Dan S, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, i like hell hath no fury a lot, but why is p4k so enamored with rappers who come up with endless clever ways to say, "I sell drugs"? Some of my favorite albums of all time (OB4CL, Fishscale, Ready to Die) deal largely with the drug game, but they're more about emotion and actual vivid stories than the "I push caine like a cripple" side of things. Or Wayne's "so much weight in the trunk make the car pop a wheelie" or whatever that they actually quote in the Carter II blurb.
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:07 (fifteen years ago)
that 4th album is fire tho.
but why is
p4k
rappers
― so sueme dude (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
those were supposed to be strikethroughs lol
but why is p4k white people so enamored with rappers anyone who comes up with endless clever ways to say, "I sell drugs"?
― so sueme dude (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
it looked better the first way! very book-cover graphic.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:13 (fifteen years ago)
― so sueme dude (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
WTF @ that Discovery review
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
Let's not tiptoe around the subject: The National are a little boring.
how did this band make it ahead of King then?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:54 (fifteen years ago)
Really! Discovery needs a reissue fast to correct that! xp
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:54 (fifteen years ago)
Also, can we put to death "folktronica" - I've read it like a million times in these blurbs.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:55 (fifteen years ago)
xpostor they could just get Tim F to re-review it!
― Dan S, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 07:04 (fifteen years ago)
OTM times 1000 Dan S
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 07:06 (fifteen years ago)
indie albums from 2000-2002 had the ugliest covers, jesus christ
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 07:37 (fifteen years ago)
95% of the time ian cohen is too far up his own ass but his 'mirrored' blurb is pretty great imo
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:10 (fifteen years ago)
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:55 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
yeah seriously
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:28 (fifteen years ago)
133. Erykah BaduNew Amerykah Part One: 4th World War
fixed
― free stfu (The Reverend), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
good post
― truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:56 (fifteen years ago)
149 Tough Alliance New Chance - didn't expect to see this at all
I didn't expect to see it one slot above Twin Cinema, which I'm bummed to see as low as No. 150. I'm guessing one or both of the prior TNP discs will be in the top 100, tho.
Also, let's not tiptoe around the subject: The Nat'l are a lot boring. I like them. Just sayin'.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 September 2009 09:01 (fifteen years ago)
― free stfu (The Reverend), Tuesday, September 29, 2009 4:51 AM (1 hour ago)
yeah it would have been cool if it was higher but it was only like 11 last year iirc? which was surprising enough itself so i'll take it
― some brood (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 10:44 (fifteen years ago)
was thinking last night that 'Discovery' must be the most influential LP on pop generally this decade
― modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
he did this well on Discovery vs. Rooty
― modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 11:01 (fifteen years ago)
Discovery was also massively infl and continues to be culturally, so far as the indie scene goes. COLOURS! DANCE!
― Niles Caulder, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
based on how the relationship between technology & social life has progressed this decade w/r/t social networking sites, facebook myspace twitter youtube and the like that have really taken off in the past 5 years, it seems really inappropriate to make the statement that radiohead's theme of technology = alienation, paranoia, etc, that technology obscures the world rather than clarifies it, is still the defining statement of the decade. it might have still been in 2004 but def. not in 2009. unless they're going strictly by the writer list tabulation i can't see anyone making a statement for kid a still.
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, but has any album captured the spirit and feel of those technological changes? Or even the spirit and feel of the last five years?
I'm not sure if Kid A is the best album of the decade, but it's a viable candidate.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:06 (fifteen years ago)
Wasn't Art Brut their No 2 record of whatever year it came out? A huge WTF moment. But if ALL THEIR WRITERS voted it that high then, how come it's down in the vicinity of 200 of the decade?
― ithappens, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:08 (fifteen years ago)
There's a lot of revisionist history in every end-of-decade poll. I don't think you can go by the old album ratings or yearly best-of lists.
For instance, I'm pretty sure that M83's first disc received from Pitchfork a much higher numerical score than its most recent disc, but it's most recent disc is ranked much higher in the best-of-the-decade list.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
Damn, there shouldn't be an apostrophe on that "its."
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
Change of writers? It was 4 years ago. xpost.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
i actually really like that they have done that, also it's cool that they have included in this list some albums that weren't well-reviewed (tallahassee, which got a 6.7) and some that were never even reviewed in the first place (blood visions). the revisionism is a good way to make up for their major oversights and gaffs, and makes for a more interesting read in my opinion than just "yep, they still love that album."
― samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
comparing albums' placement on a list to their old pfork scores is the most boring bean-counting imaginable.
― roxil muzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
especially since OMG certain albums hold up and others don't
THEY GAVE TRAIL OF DEAD A 10 AND NOW IT'S ONLY IN THE BOTTOM 100?!?!?!?! WHAT A BUNCH OF CLOWNS WHAT A DISASTRO FOR PFROK
― roxil muzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
I like this, too, but you're still assuming that there's a grand design to it all, that the revisionism is a deliberate choice, rather than a natural effect of the fact that a) it's a collective vote rather than a single review, b) there's a turnover in writers, and c) even the writers who have been around for several years will inevitably change their minds over time. It's sort of silly to imagine that the editors would say to their staff, "Hey guys, make sure you vote the first Arcade Fire album really high because Dave Moore, who doesn't even write for the site anymore and is now best known as a champion of teen-pop, gave it a 9.7 five years ago and we want to look consistent?" (I mean, Funeral probably will finish in the top 20, but not for that reason.)
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
people's fucking opinions change, jesus
― roxil muzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
god forbid i'm be tied to every opinion i had about a record in 2000
― roxil muzak (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
I used to want/demand some kind of editorial continuity over there, but it's ultimately a plus that Ryan's never cared about it, because you can't predict where an album will burn in in the scope of things. The rating is just a reaction. It's odd that so few people approach the site as a churning music news/commentary index v some kind of dusty MOJO archive of ALL MUSIC EVER, SORTED BY RANK.
Obviously the exactitude of the tenths ratings system is to blame, but somehow P4K gets to have it both ways. OMG PITCHFORK GAVE BITTE ORCA A 9.2 MUST. BAI. DID U HEAR IT YET? U HAVE NOT HEARD IT? WE ARE NOT FRIENDS v PITCHFORK LOL WHAT A JOKE U GAVE TOTD A 10.0 SIX YEARS AGO FUCKING RETRADES YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MUSIC DIE∞+ **THIS**OFFENDS**ME**.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
the only people yelling on this thread are whiney and c-o-t-t
― fleetwood (max), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
haha, i like this line from #126:
Mastodon make it work by tapping into the primal dread and awe that comes with a gigantic whale smashing the fuck out of a whole whaling ship.
― mark cl, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
what is TOTD? xpost
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
that national blurb actually captures what i like about the national even if that record's way too high
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
okay on a different note tho (see #124) i'm getting sick of hearing how "9/11 gave a whole new meaning to this lyric about buildings/airplanes/new york/helicopters"
― mark cl, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
Old; Yeller.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
It just isn't possible to hear "This Mess We're In", with duet partner Thom Yorke singing "Can you hear them?/ The helicopters?/ We're in New York," the same way again.
uh, yeah it probably is
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Monday, September 28, 2009 12:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― hannibal colecterive (some dude), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
They also edited my Tough Alliance review. I thought this was a really interesting point so I'm sharing with u all:
Ultimately, it's impossible to listen to The Tough Alliance without being reminded that the Coalition of the Willing was in fact the toughest alliance of them all. Here's hoping that the Norwegian duo's insistence that "any day's a new chance" galvanizes a flagging US global democratic mission into taking A New Chance in Iran and Pakistan.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
you know ppl making fun of that set-up like two posts up, right?
― ott or pop (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
TOTD: trail of the dead
― abanana, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
that's not their name but great try
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
pedant bear
― ott or pop (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
i would never call out the o.g. mistake but u can't perpetuate it imo
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
― ott or pop (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 15:36 (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
so tim f cant make fun of it?
― just sayin, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
Judge Whinehold has spoken
― modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
i didn't even notice the misplaced the!
― abanana, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
Since I missed it the 1st time around, thank you blueski and this thread for pointing out Tim talking about Discovery in that other thread.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
yes, thank you.
― Dan S, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
What's boring is having such a strongly negative opinion on how other people enjoy a fucking music list. Especially when you're going to point out exactly WHY it's interesting to compare album placement seconds afterward.
But there is a deliberate revisionism in that P4K is actively hiring writers with diverse POVs and differing opinions, and with enough fluidity of thought that those change and adapt over the years. You're going to be able to compare that to the inevitable shitshows that will be SPIN's and Rolling Stone's decade wrap-ups and see that there's plenty of design and forethought going into P4K's actions. Maybe they didn't ultimately know that they'd land Andrew WK on the list, but they definitely set the wheels in motion for it to happen. And that's pretty awesome.
― repulsemonkey, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
So I loaded the Pfork 150-101 tracks list last night, and read the first few blurbs. This morning I booted up the list again, and it looks like there have been a few revisions in a good number of the blurbs. Not sure why these weren't edited completely before they went to press, but here's an example.
Original blurb for Twin Cinema (my emphasis, as the bolded parts were later removed):
Great pop always knows it's pop. On Twin Cinema, Carl Newman and his band of moonlighting luminaries (including Neko Case and Destroyer's Dan Bejar) build a film-studio lot's worth of outlandish sets, and seek to discover that special something that keeps us returning to pop music. So "Use It" is a powder-keg of kinetic energy, while "The Bleeding Heart Show" (a song so awesome it made a University of Phoenix commercial seem transcendent) commemorates a missed gig with one of the most towering codas of the decade: Fuck playing for a cause-- music is the only cause. Yet for all the great moments here-- and it's one after the other-- the geeky majesty of "Sing Me Spanish Techno" stands above the rest. The song has epic scope and infinite energy, but Newman et al. express pop's power in its first three words alone: "go to now!" --Eric Harvey
New blurb for Twin Cinema:
On Twin Cinema, Carl Newman and his band of moonlighting luminaries (including Neko Case and Destroyer's Dan Bejar) build a film-studio lot's worth of outlandish sets, and seek to discover that special something that keeps us returning to pop music. So "Use It" is a powder-keg of kinetic energy, while "The Bleeding Heart Show" (a song so awesome it made a University of Phoenix commercial seem transcendent) commemorates a missed gig with one of the most towering codas of the decade: Fuck playing for a cause-- music is the only cause. Yet for all the great moments here-- and it's one after the other-- the geeky majesty of "Sing Me Spanish Techno" stands above the rest. --Eric Harvey
Why???????? I liked the original one better!
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 00:49 (fifteen years ago)
I disagree.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 00:51 (fifteen years ago)
One thing about the blurb is right: Sing Me Spanish Techno is a standout among standouts on that disc (maybe The Bleeding Heart Show's outro, with all those cascading harmonies, is as good or better).
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 01:53 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ p4k not being able to edit these blurbs before posting em
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 02:44 (fifteen years ago)
Silly list. I'm sick of lists besides totally subjective ones. So much list obsession these days...
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:20 (fifteen years ago)
next you'll say individual lists are more interesting
― some brood (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:21 (fifteen years ago)
I like lists that embrace their subjectiveness is all. Then nobody has to have stupid arguments, you just get to have interesting discussions about personal taste.
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
how could marc hogan even reflect on da drought 3 with impoverished sudanese still dying of thirst every day
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
Miss E blurb is the most eyeroll-worthy September 11th reference yet (and it's competing with like, what, 8 others?)
― een, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
did that joke get intercepted after you posted it yesterday? xp
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
― een, Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:27 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
poll?
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:29 (fifteen years ago)
we've got two more days iirc, can only get better
― some brood (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
waiting for Blueprint before i call it
― een, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
not only did j. dilla die, but also 9/11
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
man maybe we should all self ban for a while if it makes a dude come back like you
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 05:56 (fifteen years ago)
Disappointed that Third placed so low, but ranking is really pretty arbitrary outside of the top 20 anyway.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 06:03 (fifteen years ago)
i've been writing pfork 9/11 fanfic
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
the gleaming silver scales of the fish on the cover of ghostface's 2006 opus only magnified the loss of the twin towers that once loomed over new york city
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 06:07 (fifteen years ago)
the junior boys' "so this is goodbye" was a perfect headphones album for the post-9/11 world - just like the once magnificent twin towers tragically crumbled, jeremy greenspan wrote the group's second album without the input of his ex-partner
kinda surprised how low miss e is ... below the jr boys, really??
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 06:13 (fifteen years ago)
"SexyBack" is likely a time capsule joke in a decade or two-- our very own "Y.M.C.A."
^^^whaaaaaaaaa?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:27 (fifteen years ago)
i think he might be right about that tbh
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:29 (fifteen years ago)
this though:
If Malice and Pusha T sound unapologetic about their dope-dealing pasts, it's because they know that-- given the Clipse's troubled track record as major-label artists-- it's a life they're prepared to face again.
*rolling my damn eyes*
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll43/myknsj/d34fc96f.gif
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:30 (fifteen years ago)
I would agree with putting Junior Boys above Missy. Both good, but I find that Missy has a hard time sustaining her brilliance over a full length record.
― untrue pitch, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:33 (fifteen years ago)
ha, haven't got that far. but yeah, who isn't prepared to go from being millionaire rappers back to poor street pushers?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
http://emoticons4u.com/violent/sterb046.gif
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
Also, the Elephant blurb is just "hey, cheers for the free promo", right?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
― untrue pitch, Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:33 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
enlightening
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://emoticons4u.com/fingers/fing37.gif
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 07:41 (fifteen years ago)
huh, there I was sure that Ys would be top ten, or at least twenty. I know nothing.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 08:22 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, can I just say that Ys at #83 is my favorite part of this list so far?
(Also, there's a lot of decent stuff on here that I like a lot. And it doesn't seem to suffer from quite the same schizophrenia as the singles list.)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 08:23 (fifteen years ago)
Purpose and common sense coalesce around the 70 mark. A top 100 would have sufficed.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
the fix >>> your top 200
― deej, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
FWIW the Uncut top ten is
10. Fleet Foxes - Fleet Foxes9. Ryan Adams - Heartbreaker8. Bob Dylan - Modern Times7. Arcade Fire - Funeral6. Robert Plant & Alison Krauss - Raising Sand5. The Strokes - Is This It4. Brian Wilson - Smile3. Wilco - A Ghost Is Born2. Bob Dylan - Love And Theft1. The White Stripes - White Blood Cells
― Mitchell Stirling, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
lmao raising sand
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
I can't name a single song off Raising Sand. I'm not even sure I've heard a single song off it.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:51 (fifteen years ago)
It's a pleasant album at best, but nowhere near Top 10 material on any list (except for Uncut I guess).
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
SexyBack" is likely a time capsule joke in a decade or two-- our very own "Y.M.C.A."^^^whaaaaaaaaa?― Samuel (a hoy hoy)____________________________________________i think he might be right about that tbh― rather shipped (J0rdan S.)
― Samuel (a hoy hoy)____________________________________________
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.)
Yep. Y.M.C.A. --> Ring My Bell --> Achy Breaky Heart --> The Macarena --> SexyBack.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 10:47 (fifteen years ago)
Very pleased to see Guitar Romantic at No. 60. A great throwback rock record.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
Also, there's a lot of decent stuff on here that I like a lot. And it doesn't seem to suffer from quite the same schizophrenia unpredictability as the singles list.
Fixed.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
S Club Juniors' Together.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
I was sure Hissing Fauna would be in the top 20. Arular too.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:34 (fifteen years ago)
lol just spotted another 9/11 ref in the Sleater-Kinney blurb
― some dude, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
We keep our wise-ass friends for basically two reasons: Some are really nice guys once you get to know them, and some are just jerks who say a lot of funny shit. Andy Falkous and Steve Albini have made it clear where they fall, so it's no surprise they teamed up on Do Dallas-- the richest depository of quotable malevolence this side of Hell Hath No Fury. It's probably a stretch to call Do Dallas "subversive" when the production gives your speakers razor burn and the "ballad" is called "Fuck This Band". But think about 2002, when the prominent memes of rock music were wish-fulfillment fantasies of empathy, togetherness, hope, solace...heck, most of the anger was more of a cry for help than anything. We all talked a good game back then, but how long before you eventually got back to cutting people off in traffic, pissing on public toilet seats, off-handedly boasting about your cool shit, and caring more about The Bourne Identity and the World Cup than the news? The temptation to be a total dick just because you can carries an enormous power, and Do Dallas was a weapons-grade, vulgar display of that; it was also exactly 36 minutes of the most blisteringly intense pop-misanthropy the decade had to offer, but that's just Mclusky being better than your band. --Ian Cohen
WTF
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
Nabisco's Exploding Hearts thing is way awesome
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:48 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
Yeah but like a 1/3 of the songs on One Beat are actually about 9/11 as opposed to "oh hey i'll never be able to listen to this unrelated record in the same way ever again".
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
i think ian cohen is taking the "asshole" facet of mclusky far too seriously. i never tried to act out anything i heard in a mclusky song, but that didn't stop me pissing myself laughing while listening to it.
― Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
mclusky blurb a bit much but i think falco's bitterness is pretty damn singular on that record
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
haha @ Ian Cohen's blurb. If you've never met Ian, know that this is the way he talks.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
I kept trying to listen to that Mclusky album, and couldn't get past the first three soundscans.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:31 (fifteen years ago)
Try his new band, Future of the Left. It's better than McClusky.
― kornrulez6969, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 14:44 (fifteen years ago)
Thought the Decade in News was their snobiest article yet. For example they don't like Dave Matthews so TB writes about when Dave's bus driver dumped septic from the tour bus into the Chicago River and onto a boat and spends most of the article trying to blame the band without saying whether or not anyone thought they had a hand in it. And above it, Zach Braff tainted New Slang by putting it in his movie! "Thanks, Zach Braff." Its not an appalling cinematic moment, snob. Etc. etc.
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
wow
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
Evan, come on..."most of the article": There are, 18 words out of 108 about the band and the actual emptying of their bus' septic tank, none of them trying to lay blame on anyone. And of course it doesn't imply they "had a hand in it"-- how could we know such a thing? It was an accident, and it simply states that to date the DMB employee has been found criminally at fault and the band hasn't had any repercussions, despite civil suits against them. But don't let facts spoil your impression of us.
I guess since a few stray potentially "snobby" lines in tens of thousands of words over the course of eight or so features-- one being a light jab at poor defenseless Zach Braff-- colors the whole thing for you, your impression of us is already made and nothing is going to intrude on that. Oh well.
― scottpl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
i mean tbf, scott, pfork (or ANY indie rock site) even MENTIONING dave matthews band (a band not in their coverage range) is probably going to have a a hint of implied snarkiness and snobbery to it.
But why is that a bad thing, Evan? Fuck Dave Matthews, srsly.
― chris drown (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
Poor Dave and Zach, I hope they are ok!
Fuck Dave Matthews, srsly.
otm, and it can't be repeated often or loudly enough.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)
What a disaster for Dave Matthews
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
why are they so bad and so hated
― tylerw, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
"ha ha DMB lost their poop"--
Pitchfork, 9.3
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
ian cohen always comes off as an asshole so it was nice to see him finally own up to the fact that he gets off on being one
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
regardless it was really well-written imo
― some brood (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
I know this is "just a list", and generally accept it as such, but I do wonder whether any real editing effort was made by the staff (maybe addressed upthread, but I'm not reading 2,000+ posts, sorry). I'm sure the whole process was very complicated, etc., but, for example:
Let's say you're charged with voting in the (for Pitchfork anyway) Kompakt-heavy electronic music category. Did you really vote the landmarks of Michael Mayer's "Immer" (#116), or Gas's "Pop (#85) BELOW the current bargain-bin staple of The Field's "From Here We go Sublime" (#58), an album that also beats out, btw, Ghostface's "Fishscale", Portishead's "Third", and The White Stripes "Elephant"?
Not to diss The Field- it's a fine album, but if you really knew anything about minimal techno, the Kompakt record label, and electronic music in general, you just wouldn't do that, unless of course you don't take into account the relevance, impact, and reception of a record. And while I know these lists are a marmalade of individual preferences, if you don't take any of those things into account, you're kind of just whacking off.
― Reassuring Drops, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:06 (fifteen years ago)
tbh whacking off is more fun than considering the relevance, impact and reception of minimal techno
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
seriously tho the field's placement over those two records isn't really surprising is it? like, the field is definitely in the pfork canon, and i'd wager that a lot of the writers who aren't way into minimal techno probably have heard the field and not mayer/gas or at the very least have connected with the field over mayer/immer because it is newer and was brought to their attention first etc
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
what a disaster for minimal techno label Kompakt
― mammories from an imperfect angle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
why would people vote for the highest profile record in a fringe genre?! what fucking idiots!
― mammories from an imperfect angle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
next thing you're gonna tell me that Mastodon was ranked higher than Electric Wizard!
Sure, of course, I get that Chris. And we certainly made a joke or so at the band's music in there. But at this point how often are we snarky? A bit in news here and there and that's about it. Nowhere near as often as, say, Blender was. But nobody then talks about snarkiness as their defining quality, or draws a line from their jokes and jabs to "snobbery" since they covered pop stars and we almost never do. (Though if we do, it's almost because we're talking about their music or them as artists rather than as personalities or punchlines.)
Anyway, not sure why I cared in this case, no offense to Evan really.
― scottpl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
xxp re: GAS, i'm not sure if this factors in, but i feel like gas's 'pop' is probably located in more peoples' minds as part of the 90s canon - it capped off a series of albums that felt like a whole statement that all appeared in the late 90s. maybe it didn't factor in that highly b/c people didn't even think of it that much as something from the 00s? i mean kompakt wasn't even born yet, was it?
(and it's interesting in general to see albums on the list from 2000 on the list, and thinking about which ones appear more "of" the 90s than kicking off the 00s)
― mark cl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
basically jordan s otm wrt the field & the p4k canon
― mark cl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
Not really surprising at all- just a tad baffling that the other said albums actually did make it onto the list in the first place without someone looking at the order and saying "oops". I mean, "Alcahofa" was somewhere around #165 or so, and "Easy Lee" itself would sensibly put that record near the top of any "best of the decade" list (or at least above anything by The Field).
But yes, agreed- whacking off is way more fun than minimal techno considerations. Just had to get it off my chest (the rant- not the whacking- eeewwww).
― Reassuring Drops, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
i just heard easy lee for the first time... is the vocal supposed to sound all crackly and imperfect or did i get a bad leak?
― mammories from an imperfect angle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know exactly what ur hearing but it's sung through a vocoder so yea it should sound kind of fucked with
― mark cl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
Haha sorry to make anyone upset (Scott), I was just annoyed at that part of the article: "Wohl eventually pleaded guilty to reckless conduct and water pollution, but Matthews continues to get off scot free. (The passengers on the boat did sue the band, though.)" The Zach Braff one happened to be next to it, and I remember skimming over some other things that I felt were similar in tone. I was in a grumpy mood when I wrote that. I don't mean to upset anyone- lets be friends.
Also its regardless of how much anyone likes Dave Matthews.
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
capn-save-a-dmb
― mark cl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
Matthews continues to get off scot free Matthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot freeMatthews continues to get off scot free
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, it's not like CLEAN vocoder like "O Superman" or Imogen Heap
It's like eeeEEEEAASY LLe-
― mammories from an imperfect angle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:28 (fifteen years ago)
Sigh.
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:28 (fifteen years ago)
I think the most interesting thing about this Pitchfork list is what it reflects in memory, attention span, and spacetime.
I can look at any vinyl record album in my collection and lock into the exact time and place in my life I listened to it most.
My first reaction to much of this decade list has been "Wow, did that really come out in 2002?"
― Reassuring Drops, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
whiney i think u got the right one
― mark cl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
Scott, lets be friends!
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
i suppose the lack of unwound - leaves turn inside you so far means it didn't make it :(
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
Oh yeah that album is wonderful.
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
xpostThe vocals on Easy Lee are so distorted it's impossible to know for sure what he's singing.
― Dan S, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
is Junior Boys - So This Is Goodbye going to make it into the top 50? that would be bomb
― een, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
i bet it will but hope it won't given the number of artist repeats that are already on here
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
someone should do a round up of other message boards talkin about this list
― mammories from an imperfect angle (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
why, has ott done any more annual income comparisons on hipinion lately?
― some dude, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
Dave Matthews is seriously underrated on ilx. Kinda like "should I give grateful dead a chance?" lolz. People on some serious issues in this place
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
Blech. (to both DMB and GD)
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
***** Suggest Ban *****
Please be aware that by confirming this action, you are registering your wish to see this user removed from the site. Once the user has 51 such votes from individual users, they will automatically be banned from the site.
Suggest this user to be banned.
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
Me?
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
lorax
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
Evan, I might have an extra ticket to the Cubs game this weekend...but, yeah, sorry for poking at you
― scottpl, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
I was sure Hissing Fauna would be in the top 20.
Hm, it strikes me as a fairly divisive record. Those who like it go nuts over it, those who don't find it really annoying.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
The vocals on Easy Lee are so distorted it's impossible to know for sure what he's singing.
― Dan S, Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:43 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Good thread: Can anyone decipher the lyrics to Villalobos' "Easy Lee"?
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
me? is Satellite really that bad of a song? or Cumberland Blues?
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
Scott, I am sorry I came off much angrier than I actually was. I like Pitchfork. Next time you're in Hoboken, NJ let me know!
― Evan, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure how Mr. Que thinks I came off.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
i guess i have serious issues
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:05 (fifteen years ago)
I honestly don't know maaaayne
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:07 (fifteen years ago)
Still no one's made a plain text version of the list?
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
200. Califone - Quicksand / Cradlesnakes
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
199. Hot Hot Heat - Make Up the Breakdown
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
198. Safety Scissors - Parts Water
197. Scout Niblett - Kidnapped by Neptune
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
xxp re: GAS, i'm not sure if this factors in, but i feel like gas's 'pop' is probably located in more peoples' minds as part of the 90s canon - it capped off a series of albums that felt like a whole statement that all appeared in the late 90s. maybe it didn't factor in that highly b/c people didn't even think of it that much as something from the 00s?
Good point, and I'm finding that a lot of stuff (not just techno) from 2000-2002 feels like it happened twenty years ago instead of ten. It's throwing me for a bit of a loop in trying to come up with my own best of the decade list.
I do think that The Field's high ranking will look a bit silly in 3-4 years, it's not so much that it was a high profile record in a fringe genre, but that it came out only two years ago and is still fresh in people's minds (and that's partly because The Field released a new album this year).
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
196. Thursday - War All the Time
― & other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
195. Kano - Home Sweet Home
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
194. Ulf Lohmann - Because Before
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
193. A.R.E. Weapons - A.R.E. Weapons
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
192. Now It's Overhead - Now It's Overhead
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
Only the top 50 left. I hope we'll still see The Drift, Geogaddi, and Vocalcity in there.
― untrue pitch, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
191. Gene Defcon - Come Party With Me
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
― chutesy ladders (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:43 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark
no worries dude this is still as clever and hilarious as when you did it for the tracks list.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
You're right, we should all respond to all the cries of "Still no one's made a plain text version of the list?" with "I'LL GET RIGHT ON IT!"
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
which is why i did it lact time too
― weirdo shippers (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
I'm too dum to get the joke anyway.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
yeah youre right just ignoring something would be completely out of the question
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
I like Kano.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
190. U2 - All that you can't leave behind
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
189. Soulja Boy Tell 'Em - Souljaboytellem.com
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
188. Daughtry - Daughtry
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
187. Bowling for Soup - The Great Burrito Extortion Case
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
186. Fieldy's Dreams - Rock 'n' Roll Gangster
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
185. Mick Jagger - Goddess in the Doorway
― denim nutsack (Whitey on the Moon), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
I can't believe Fieldy's Dreams didn't make the top 100!!! :'(
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 02:33 (fifteen years ago)
I'm glad these guys are finally getting their due.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 02:41 (fifteen years ago)
Rock on, Bowling for Soup.
100-51 just kicked my ass.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 04:59 (fifteen years ago)
OTM for poster upthread who said "Sexy Back" will be used to embarrass people at weddings in 20 years.
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:13 (fifteen years ago)
50-21 is up now
― Dan S, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
fever to tell at number 24, wow
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:26 (fifteen years ago)
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:07 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
can i just repost this to draw attention to how amazing it is thx
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:29 (fifteen years ago)
is the Phoenix album a surprise?
― abanana, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
you know, people have been repping for phoenix all decade long, but i never noticed it until this year!
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:36 (fifteen years ago)
No Gimme Fiction or Sunlandic Twins.. not surprised.
Phoenix was their #50 album of 2006, and my #2 for that year.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
good to see Alligator up there. that album's tite
― wilter, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:40 (fifteen years ago)
Just in case none of you guys knew, "Paper Planes" was used in the trailer to Pineapple Express.. I'm not sure if that's been established as fact yet.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:42 (fifteen years ago)
― wilter, Thursday, October 1, 2009 5:40 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
that's kind of a surprise, though. the 50-21 part of the list doesn't have many of them
― Dan S, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:44 (fifteen years ago)
what's left?
kid aillinoismerriweather post pavilionyankee hotel foxtrot wtc 9/11 turn on the bright lightsfuneralneon biblediscoverywhite blood cellsperson pitchsilent shoutsound of silverstankoniathe blueprintsince i left youbright like neon love
that's 16.
― abanana, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:54 (fifteen years ago)
agaetis byrjun or whatever
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:57 (fifteen years ago)
Rated R should be there but won't be :(
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
SB/TLB???
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
Late Registration, Smile. has Since I Left You shown up yet?
― Dan S, Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
the moon & antarctica!
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
scott pl wasn't kidding when he said there wouldn't be much from 2009. only two albums so far
― Dan S, Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:08 (fifteen years ago)
bright like neon love
lol whut
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:13 (fifteen years ago)
The only reason why I think Relationship of Command might be top 20 is because atdi were mentioned in "the decade in news" but still somehow it doesn't feel like a typical shoe-in album.. And similarly, besides Animal Collective and Grizzly Bear, there aren't any 2009 albums that seem like they should receive lots of votes all at once. I'm surprised Dirty Projectors placed well.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
Did 1999 get shafted during the initial best of the 90s run the way 2009 has been?
It certainly didn't help 1999's case that a) it took everybody a while to find the diamonds in the rough, like it always does b) 1999 was an exceptionally great year for songs but not albums
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
But then I might just be remembering 1999 through the lens of childhood and radio pop.
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:44 (fifteen years ago)
You just know, with crushing inevitability, that Kid A is going to win, purely because EVERYONE voting in this poll (maybe) has been waiting for ten years to put it at the top of their list in some kind of long-winded Pavlovian indie fuXXor conspiracy. None of them will actually love this record the most out of all the records of this decade, they'll just have been expecting to do this for so long that they can't comprehend doing anything else.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:16 (fifteen years ago)
Is that surprising? I've never liked YYY, so it's a genuine question. The high ranking makes me at least want to give the disc another listen.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:22 (fifteen years ago)
None of them will actually love this record the most out of all the records of this decade, they'll just have been expecting to do this for so long that they can't comprehend doing anything else.
Not sure how you could know that. Seems like a lot of people love the disc, and the band (maxing out their 3 disc limit, all in the top 50). BTW, Anmesiac appearing today (and, presumably, Kid A tomorrow) means that HTTT won't be on the list.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:26 (fifteen years ago)
I know that because it's a rubbish record. < / pseudo objectivity >
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:31 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Brace yourself for upset tomorrow. I (maybe mistakenly) thought you liked Radiohead? In Rainbows, at least, seems to me to be a well-produced/engineered and dynamic record, which I know is something you'd appreciate.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:37 (fifteen years ago)
I don't HATE Radiohead, I just think they're massively, massively overrated, and that, with regard to end-of-decade-polls, KId A has been hovering like a vulture for an entire fucking decade expecting to get voted at number 1 in every poll going, and it makes every single poll that it does win in redundant. With end of 90s polls there was an element of surprise, of being reminded of great records you'd meant to check out but hadn't got round to, or had loved and then forgotten. Kid A has been Pitchfork's album of the decade since September 2000, making the whole exercise redundant.
Obviously I hope I'm wrong.
And a record can be well engineered and dynamic etc and still be boring.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:42 (fifteen years ago)
KId A has been hovering like a vulture for an entire fucking decade expecting to get voted at number 1 in every poll going
Damn that Kid A and his intentions.
― Turangalila, Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:50 (fifteen years ago)
The biggest problem with 1999 is that the Kelis and Jay-Z albums came out in, like, December.
But it was a great year for albums and singles both I think.
― Tim F, Thursday, 1 October 2009 08:55 (fifteen years ago)
Xiu Xiu's 'A Promise' isn't yet on the list is it?
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:05 (fifteen years ago)
Obviously, Turangalila, Kid A itself as an entity isn't to blame; but people's attitudes towards it for it's entire existence have made this seem inexorable and predetermined. And thus no fun.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:08 (fifteen years ago)
Scik - I hate to rant on about Kid A, but I feel ya with the vulture metaphor. I do think it deserves a lot of its praise, but I'm not convinced it's the 'best of the decade'. I'm also not too keen on the idea of Radiohead taking Pitchfork's top honors in two consecutive decades. After all, not even the Beatles could claim that.
There are a handful of albums from this decade that I think explore new territory more successfully and with more skill (ie. Silent Shout, Person Pitch, Endless Summer, et al.). I would personally put those albums above Kid A, but I also see that their respective statements are more specific, more acute. Kid A has a wider scope and a wider appeal (which doesn't necessarily make it better); thus more of the Pitchfork staffers will likely rate it as one of the best.
The only album I can definitely see posing a challenge, given these factors, is Discovery (as others have pointed out above). But I don't think Pitchfork's staff has the guts to put a dance record in the #1 position for the decade; they still tend to cling to their guitar-based rock like a life preserver. I hope I'm wrong.
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:18 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think it's all so inevitable. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Silent Shout at No. 1.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:21 (fifteen years ago)
has Kish Kash placed?
― suggestbannn/the lorax below (The Reverend), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:21 (fifteen years ago)
Has TNP's Electric Version placed yet?
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:23 (fifteen years ago)
Scik Mouthy OTM re: Kid A, I'm ready to take my medicine and be done with it.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:24 (fifteen years ago)
Kish Kash wont place.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:25 (fifteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, October 1, 2009 9:21 AM
That'd be great. You never know ...
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:25 (fifteen years ago)
I think the best album from the (likely) top 20 is "Person Pitch" or maybe one of the Arcade Fire albums. This is kinda sad, actually.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:27 (fifteen years ago)
What happened to The Drift?
I'm not expecting #1, obviously, but is it in the top 20 or was it completely left off the list?
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
The Drift will be left off.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:31 (fifteen years ago)
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:18 (11 minutes ago) Bookmark
Are you trolling? They have put plenty of non-guitar based rock top of polls (Justin Timberlake, Annie, Person Pitch and Silent Shout off the top of the dome) and if anyone dislikes Discovery they are dead inside, while it is a lot easier to see the problems with Kid A. That and Kid A only has one real "guitar-based rock" song...
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:35 (fifteen years ago)
Kid A would be as good as XTRMNTR if there was more National Anthem and less Treefingers.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, there's not going to be a place for the drift.
credibility for this list will be severely lost for me if TWO arcade fire albums make the top 20. i mean, come on.
no hail to the thief anywhere on the list is a bit silly if you ask me.
always good to see a bit of revisionism here and there though. always keeps things interesting .
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
Umm no, not trolling. JT and Annie topped the singles/tracks lists; I should've clarified, I'm talking about albums. Singles are a whole other ballgame.
Silent Shout and Person Pitch were great surprises. And I did allude to that by saying I don't think they have the guts to place a dance record at #1 for the DECADE (not year).
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
You're talking about it as if there are suspicious editorial machinations that underlie everything ... it's not about "guts", it's a poll, and if enough people vote for "Discovery" or "Silent Shout" or whatever, then it will win.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
No place for The Drift in the decade's top 200 records is an outrage!
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:49 (fifteen years ago)
I believe someone from Pitchfork noted on here that it's not 100% by the numbers, that there is a little editorial 'massaging'.
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:50 (fifteen years ago)
You're talking about it as if everyone is capable of 100% emotional honesty / honesty of taste all the time, which also isn't true; there are gonna be all sorts of conflicting desires and impulses and influences affecting each individual ballot paper, which will in turn, of course, affect the overall poll results. I doubt very much that the Pitchfork editorial staff would massively gerrymander the list to get the result they wanted; but that doesn't mean that individual voters aren't subconsciously gerrymandering results by making sure they vote for albums they think they should vote for rather than albums they actually love.
I'm not saying that people are outright lying, just that, you know, ideology is a powerful thing and it's massively at play in music journalism.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:52 (fifteen years ago)
Taste is easily led in young males searching for identity.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
"If you don't like Kid A you're a dick".
"If you do like Kid A you're a sheep".
no place for Aerial either?
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:54 (fifteen years ago)
It's buy a woman.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
Great points.
― untrue pitch, Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:57 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, apologies, I'm being deliberately outrageous here.
The Drift wont poll because, presumably, each ballot was 50 albums, and I bet that, while a lot of people ADMIRE this record a lot, and would have put it in their 51-100 section, probably not enough LOVE IT to include it in a top 50. I reckon it's a record that a lot of people played quite intensively for a few days / weeks to get their head round it, then never visited it again. it's hardly a jolly thing to play often, is it?
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
Kate Bush probably wont poll for similar reasons. Eccentric English people releasing records that everyone has to have an opinion on briefly but that few people revisit often for affection.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:00 (fifteen years ago)
Which is kind of how I feel about Radiohead.
i.e. there are most certainly 50+ records from the last ten years that I love MORE.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
I beg to differ Nick. It may not be "jolly", but for some people (like myself) it is a record to play often. Just don't expect something "jolly".
But I can see how by your argumentation it will not be placed. Which still is an outrage!
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
I don't disagree that some people are gonna love it to bits and play it a lot; hell, my number 1 would probably be Codename:Dustsucker, which I doubt many other people even remember who are gonna be voting in polls like this. I just think you shouldn't be surprised if it's not in the poll because I wouldn't count on anyone else voting for it.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
When we ran polls like this at Stylus, 00-05 poll, or the top 101-200 albums ever, or whatever, we always said "vote for what you love, even if you're not sure regarding eligibility etc; just don't expect anyone else to vote for it".
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
Oh I'm not surprised by it, just like you I don't expect Scott up there. Nor Bark Psychosis.
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
i mean in all seriousness, every pitchfork list you read is going to be comfortably predictable and any "surprise" that crops up occasionally is going to be of the safe and calculated variety. it's a classic case of groupthink. that said, i always enjoy reading what they have to say about the albums. i'm pretty detached about it all and never expect much balance or to be influenced particularly. this allows me to overlook the fact that they consistently leave out some of my favourites.
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
In my mind, The Drift definitely ought to be in there in place of dross like Source Tags & Codes, and Aerial in place of dross like Chutes Too Narrow. Sadly, though, it's unlikely that Scott or Kate would end up in a poll that also includes records like those two.
Charlie, that's very magnanimous of you. I agree, I guess. Doesn't mean it doesn't piss me off. maybe I ought to arrange my own poll.
Groupthink always results in boring choices.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:12 (fifteen years ago)
I doubt very much that the Pitchfork editorial staff would massively gerrymander the list to get the result they wanted; but that doesn't mean that individual voters aren't subconsciously gerrymandering results
OK, here's where I make the same comment that I make on all the poll threads ... a lot of this depends on the scoring method for the poll, e.g. consider the ILM 80's poll, where #1 votes were worth 3x #2 votes, which led to dishonest voting where people underrank their actual favourites (which don't "need" the votes because many others are likely to vote for them too) and instead put their pet song/album at #1 to bump it up the chart.
I'm not sure how PF scored this, but if it's e.g 50, 49, ... 1 then there is more scoring emphasis on albums that get the most votes, or IOW, if there is only one point difference between the scores given to my #1 and #2 album, then I won't waste much time agonizing over which order to put them in because the effect on the final tally is minimal. But if there's a 10 point difference, then I'll think about it more carefully, and am probably more likely to give extra votes to my personal favourites that might otherwise be underrepresented.
I didn't notice that, if true, then I take back some of what I said.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:17 (fifteen years ago)
OTOH, maybe I'm the only person who gives a crap about poll scoring schemes. I personally think it matters a hell of a lot, but maybe that's because I tend to obsess a bit over the issue, self-fulfilling prophecy, etc.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:20 (fifteen years ago)
i've probably only heard half the albums in the top 100 and i kinda feel like that's enough heh
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
'chutes too narrow' is an album i was hoping people would forget about completely as the years wore on. it's one of the best examples i can think of as far as boring choices go on this list.
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
the Uncut List via:
http://swearimnotpaul.blogspot.com/2009/09/list-uncuts-top-150-albums-of-00s.html
can some statto do the similarity count between the albums listed on both Pitchfork 200 and Uncut 150?
150 - Band of Horses Everything All the Time149 - Ray Lamontagne Trouble148 - Franz Ferdinand Franz Ferdinand147 - The Acorn Glory Hope Mountain146 - Richard Thompson Front Parlour Blues145 - Iron & Wine Our Endless Numbered Days144 - Robert Wyatt Comicopera143 - Leonard Cohen Ten New Songs142 - Yeah Yeah Yeahs Fever to Tell141 - Rahel Unthank and the Winterset The Bairns
140 - Espers Espers II139 - Outkast Speakerboxxx/The Love Below138 - Wilco Sky Blue Sky137 - Elliott Smith From a Basement on a Hill136 - The Strokes Room on Fire135 - Willard Grant Conspiracy Regard the End134 - Radiohead Hail to the Thief133 - Bruce Springsteen We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions132 - Drive-By Truckers Brighter Than Creation's Dark131 - Coldplay A Rush of Blood to the Head
130 - Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds Dig!!! Lazarus Dig!!!129 - Yo La Tengo And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside Out128 - Antony and the Johnsons I Am A Bird Now127 - The Handsome Family In the Air126 - Neil Young Prairie Wind125 - The Hold Steady Stay Positive124 - Brightback Morning Light Brightback Morning Light123 - Doves The Last Broadcast122 - Donald Fagen Morph the Cat121 - Hot Chip The Warning
120 - MGMT Oracular Spectacular119 - Scritti Politti White Bread, Black Beer118 - Super Furry Animals Love Kraft117 - At the Drive-In Relationship of Command116 - Sufjan Stevens - Michigan115 - Steven Malkmus & The Jicks Real Emotional Trash114 - The Raconteurs Consolers of the Lonely113 - The Shins Chutes Too Narrow112 - Beirut The Flying Club Cup111 - Jenny Lewis with the Watson Twins Rabbit Furcoat
110 - Steely Dan Everything Must Go109 - The White Stripes Icky Thump108 - Comets on Fire Avatar107 - Paul Westerberg Come Feel Me Tremble106 - The Go-Betweens The Friends of Rachel Worth105 - Steely Dan Two Against Nature104 - Grizzly Bear Veckatimest103 - Missy Elliott Miss E...So Addictive102 - The Felice Brothers The Felice Brothers101 - Neko Case Blacklisted
100 - Jim O'Rourke Insignificance99 - Babyshambles Down in Albion98 - The Avalanches Since I Left You97 - Paul Weller 22 Dreams96 - Rufus Wainwright Want One95 - Grandaddy The Sophtware Slump94 - Devendra Banhart Oh Me Oh My...93 - The Streets A Grand Don't Come For Free92 - Tom Waits Real Gone91 - John Cale HoboSapiens
90 - Bright Eyes I'm Wide Awake, it's Morning89 - Neil Young Living With War88 - The White Stripes Get Behind Me Satan87 - Queens of the Stone Age Rated R86 - PJ Harvey White Chalk85 - MIA Arular84 - David Bowie Heathen83 - Outkast Stankonia82 - Drive-By Truckers The Dirty South81 - Okkervil River The Stage Names
80 - Levon Helm Electric Dirt79 - Kings of Leon Only By the Night78 - Johnny Cash American III: Solitary Man77 - Kanye West The College Dropout76 - Beck Seachange75 - Gorillaz Demon Days74 - Elbow Asleep in the Black73 - Elliott Smith Figure 872 - Emmylou Harris Red Dirt Girl71 - TV on the Radio Dear Science
70 - The Good, The Bad & The Queen The Good, The Bad & The Queen69 - Arctic Monkeys Favourite Worst Nightmare68 - D'Angelo Voodoo67 - Midlake The Trials of Van Occupanther66 - Jay-Z The Blueprint65 - Rufus Wainwright Poses64 - Lift to Experience The Texas-Jerasulem Crossroads63 - The Rolling Stones A Bigger Bang62 - Ghostface Killah Fishscale61 - Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds The Lyre of Orpheus/Abbatoir Blues
60 - Loretta Lynn Van Lear Rose59 - The White Stripes De Stijl58 - Bob Dylan - Together Through Life57 - Robert Wyatt Cukooland56 - Sonic Youth Murray Street55 - Bjork Vespertine54 - Magnetic Fields 69 Love Songs53 - Interpol Turn on the Bright Lights52 - Dizzee Rascal Boy in Da Corner51 - Warren Zevon The Wind
50 - Cat Power The Greatest49 - PJ Harvey Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea48 - Ry Cooder Chavez Ravine47 - The National Alligator46 - Drive-By Truckers Souther Rock Opera45 - Solomon Burke Don't Give Up on Me44 - The Libertines Up the Bracket43 - The Streets Original Pirate Material42 - Richmond Fontaine Post to Wire41 - Bruce Springsteen Magic
40 - Boards of Canada Geogaddi39 - Vampire Weekend Vampire Weekend38 - Ryan Adams Gold37 - The Raconteurs Broken Boy Soldiers36 - Johnny Cash American IV: The Man Comes Around35 - Wilco Yankee Hotel Foxtrot34 - Bon Iver For Emma, Forever Ago33 - Animal Collective Merriweather Post Pavilion32 - Calexico Feast of Wire31 - My Morning Jacket It Still Moves
30 - Sufjan Stevens Illinois29 - Neil Young Chrome Dreams II28 - Queens of the Stone Age Songs for the Deaf27 - The Hold Steady Boys and Girls in America26 - Lambchop Nixonland25 - Radiohead Kid A24 - Arctic Monkeys Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not23 - Beth Gibbons & Rustin Man Out of Season22 - Blur Think Thank21 - Joanna Newsom Ys
20 - Amy Winehouse Back to Black19 - Bruce Springsteen The Rising18 - Kate Bush Aerial17 - The White Stripes - Elephant16 - LCD Soundsytem Sound of Silver15 - Radiohead In Rainbows14 - Primal Scream XTRMNTR13 - Gillian Welch Time (The Revelator)12 - Portishead Third11 - The Flaming Lips Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots
10 - Fleet Foxes Fleet Foxes9 - Ryan Adams Heartbreaker8 - Bob Dylan Modern Times7 - The Arcade Fire Funeral6 - Robert Plant & Alison Krauss Raising Sand5 - The Strokes Is This It4 - Brian Wilson Smile3 - Wilco A Ghost is Born2 - Bob Dylan Love and Theft1 - The White Stripes White Blood Cells
― djmartian, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
subconsciously gerrymandering have no idea what this means really, but what a great phrase, 9.2
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
i can't be bothered going back over the pitchfork list - was there any tom waits?
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
26 - Lambchop Nixonland
is this some extended version of Nixon that INEEDRIGHTNOW or just a weird typo?
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
22 - Blur Think Tank
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
a blogger typo
― djmartian, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
the uncut thing reads like a reader's list.
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
I think the Pitchfork list does too, obviously with a slightly different demographic
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
agreed.
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:20 (29 minutes ago) Bookmark
Feel free to obsess here Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiit! It's the ILX Decade-End TV Poll!!!!!
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
2 - Bob Dylan Love and Theft1 - The White Stripes White Blood Cells
Pfffft, (n.1) now that's an exciting list.
_________________________________(n.1) Pffft: An expression of mild contempt or dismissal. Usually made in response upon seeing/hearing nonsense or bullshit. Urban Dictionary (last visited, Roctober 1, 2009).
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:17 (fifteen years ago)
Hail To The Thief will definitely reach the Top 20. That means all the four Radiohead albums will be in the top 50. Crazy, at least.
― zeus, Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
No, it won't.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
There's a limit of three discs per artist on the list. Radiohead's three: Amnesiac; In Rainbows; and presumably, Kid A (tomorrow).
Oh, I didn't know about the limit. Still, 3 Radiohead albums in 50 is crazy, too.
― zeus, Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
and would you have 3 in the top 50 without one of them being top? feh
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
Would you have a 60s list and say "only 3 Beatles records"? I know I'm contradicting myself here, but as rules go, that's stupid.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
Tempted to push the button that would create the Which is Worse: Radiohead or the Beatles? poll.
― Good stand-up, Americans (kingkongvsgodzilla), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not aware of any "massaging" for the poll. Though I didn't pay attention to how my 1-100 picks were weighted.
I voted Discovery as my number 1 but I would be surprised if it got there.
― Tim F, Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:20 (fifteen years ago)
Mike Skinner isn't northern.
― CosMc (Raw Patrick), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:25 (fifteen years ago)
he is to us southern shandies
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
If I was a statto I would've found an easier way of working it out, but here's the album overlaps so far. (Uncut placings in first brackets, then P4Ks)
Antony and the Johnsons I Am A Bird Now (128) (49)Arctic Monkeys Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not (24) (183)Band of Horses Everything All the Time (150) (109)Beck Seachange (76) (82)Bjork Vespertine (55) (92)Boards of Canada Geogaddi (40) (30)Bon Iver For Emma, Forever Ago (34) (29)D'Angelo Voodoo (68) (44)Dizzee Rascal Boy in Da Corner (52) (62)Elliott Smith Figure 8 (73) (190)Fleet Foxes Fleet Foxes (10) (32)Franz Ferdinand Franz Ferdinand (148) (101)Ghostface Killah Fishscale (62) (75)Grizzly Bear Veckatimest (104) (42)Hot Chip The Warning (121) (81)Jim O'Rourke Insignificance (100) (166)Joanna Newsom Ys (21) (83)Kanye West The College Dropout (77) (28)Missy Elliott Miss E...So Addictive (103) (77)Neko Case Blacklisted (101) (141)Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds The Lyre of Orpheus/Abbatoir Blues (61) (180)PJ Harvey Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea (49) (124)Portishead Third (12) (71)Primal Scream XTRMNTR (14) (142)Queens of the Stone Age Songs for the Deaf (28) (134)Radiohead In Rainbows (15) (21)Ryan Adams Heartbreaker (9) (122)Sonic Youth Murray Street (56) (108)Sufjan Stevens - Michigan (116) (70)The Flaming Lips Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (11) (67)The Hold Steady Boys and Girls in America (27) (64)The Libertines Up the Bracket (44) (138)The National Alligator (47) (40)The Shins Chutes Too Narrow (113) (46)The Streets A Grand Don't Come For Free (93) (129)The Streets Original Pirate Material (43) (36)The White Stripes - Elephant (17) (74)TV on the Radio Dear Science (71) (140)Vampire Weekend Vampire Weekend (39) (51)Yeah Yeah Yeahs Fever to Tell (142) (24)Yo La Tengo And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside Out (129) (37)
That's possibly the most boring thing I've ever done. Until I do it again tomorrow.
― j.o.n.a, Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
some of 50-21 is pretty gd rough
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:39 (fifteen years ago)
Small thing: Without looking it up, I believe Phoenix was #12 that year.
― scottpl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
wolfgang is the better album imo, but wouldn't haven expected either in the top 50
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
really don't get the love for INBLT or WAP over Alphabetical
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
Discovery didn't even beat Kid A in this board's albums poll IIRC so expecting it to win Pitchfork's is a stretch.
(I voted for it as my #1 tho)
― Groke, Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
can't believe this decade peaked in its first year
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
^ yea, seems like a lot of these are from 2000
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
well, actually not too many now that i'm browing through it. just some of the classics
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
*browsing
2001 was pretty good too
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
I think the biggest surprise in 50-21 is that Kala landed at #22. I fully expected that album to place in the top ten.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
I'm holding out hope for Kish Kash in the top 20 -- I would be thrilled.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
I can actually see MPP being #1 if not Kid A. I'll be surprised if it's not one of the two.
― lou, Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
The whole decade has been very good imo (overall). Somewhere in the introduction to the Top 200 discs feature Pitchfork says that the list from this decade stands up well against those lists it compiled for earlier decades, and I think that's right.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
(Unless Kevin Federline's album turns out to be No. 1. Then I'll have to revise my opinion.)
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
basically this list can have whatever it wants as #1 because it made me happy simply by ranking Kala above Arular
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
The whole decade has been very good imo (overall). Somewhere in the introduction to the Top 200 discs feature Pitchfork says that the list from this decade stands up well against those lists it compiled for earlier decades, and I think that's right.(xp)― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, October 1, 2009 9:52 AM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, October 1, 2009 9:52 AM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Grow ears, homie.
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Haters gotta hate.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_AVneizTKcl8/SPQngvUo4XI/AAAAAAAAB48/ZzKDLiXgsNI/s400/hater.jpg
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
If I had it my way Calexico would be on there.
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
^^ otm
― govt just cut all ties with acorn squash (Pillbox), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
if MPP is number one, I will leave the internet for good. xposts.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
no bark psychosis, no cred
― govt just cut all ties with acorn squash (Pillbox), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
Come on Gukbe. Pitchfork isn't forcing taste on you.
"Shit, my favorite album of the decade so far wasn't on the list. Guess I was wrong."
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
Thing is, dude, you will get some people who think like that.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
Nuts as it is.
no problems with my favourite albums not being on the list.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
If I had it my way Calexico would be on there.― Evan, Thursday, October 1, 2009 2:21 PM ^^ otm― govt just cut all ties with acorn squash (Pillbox)
― Evan, Thursday, October 1, 2009 2:21 PM
― govt just cut all ties with acorn squash (Pillbox)
^^^^OTM. Feast of Wine didn't make it? That's odd.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
Disappointment is a silly feeling towards this list.
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah Feast of Wire would be on mine if I ever made one.
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
some big shockas in the 50-21: madvillainy, kala and fever to tell are all albums i expected had their feet solidly in the door for top twenty. guess i was wrong! kala is probably album of the decade imo, or atleast like if i were a music critic and had to justify it with words y'know. i'm relived tvotr and fleet foxes won't be in the top 20, though.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
btw i'm not sure if this was mentioned upthread since this morning, but i'm not in the mood for will smith and didn't want to open up the rest of the thread to check.
bon iver higher than expected
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
(xpost)IT'S HERE AND I LIKE IT
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
Oh yeah Herbert: Scale is another missing. Right?
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
what a bunch of retrades
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
how dare they
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
Shouldn't say "missing" I guess. I don't give a crap either way.
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
top 20 is relatively easy to predict, basically albums that at this point well they couldn't possibly be left off the list.
sufjan stephens - illinoisthe strokes - is this itlcd soundsystem - sound of silveroutkast - stankoniajay z - the blueprintradiohead - kid adaft punk - discoveryanimal collective - merriweather post pavilionpanda bear - person pitcharcade fire - funeralmissy elliot - under construction
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
Kid A above Amnesiac would also make me very happy
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
thats only 11 albums, you are rubbish at predicting this. :)
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
Don't know about Missy, but yeah otherwise.
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
i know an album that all the top 20 fanfic ppl are forgetting but i won't embarrass myself by posting about it
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
is it Green Day
― tylerw, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
that's good, you've been doing an excellent job of dodging embarrassment on this thread so far
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
Could Yankee Hotel Foxtrot be a contender for #1, or is P4K too over its Wilco love affair these days?
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
yeah the rest are kind of risky, but those 11 i would bet my left testicle on. and the missy elliot, i just figured that so addictive wouldn't be the only missy album on the list, which might have been silly logic but i dont think so.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
pretty toney?
― just sayin, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
xpost oh yeah, oops.
My Left Testicle have a new album coming out, right?
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
My thoughts on this list- I should dig out Donuts again and finally get around to listening to all them Kompakt things. Don't really care about the order, but would love to see Discovery or Blueprint beat Kid A.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
It's true, it is dumb to feel disappointment about something being left off the list, but I can't help feeling a little glum if y'all are right and The Drift gets left off. Just because I thought ppl started to finally "get" Scott Walker Mk II this decade. God knows no one wanted to hear about Tilt the first five years or so after it came out. Mebbe you guys are right though, everyone at least gave a listen.
BTW Scik, Scott W is American, not a britishes.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
All I can say is Love and Theft better be in the top 20, or I may be forced to write them a sternly worded letter.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
Gukbe is off the web because of you.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
only two or three of my favourite albums of the decade have been on the list so far, and it doesn't bother me a bit. 200 is a really small sampler considering how much music gets released in a decade. also i don't want to sound like a sarcastic ass but is there some kind of joy or satisfaction in having your tastes reflected or reaffirmed by internet lists? i can't really imagine feeling that way.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
xpost hahaha
― aTLDRiens (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
don't want to sound like a sarcastic ass but is there some kind of joy or satisfaction in having your tastes reflected or reaffirmed by internet lists?
this is pretty much why internet lists get traffic afaik
I may be forced to do the same if it is in the top 20.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
is 'West Coast' in this bitch or what
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
That was a zinger!
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
Here are the other 9
bob dylan – love and theftwhite stripes – white blood cellsspoon – kill the moonlightmodest mouse – the moon and antarcticaInterpol – turn on the bright lightsThe knife – silent shoutWilco – yankee hotel foxtrotKanye west – late registrationNew pornographers – electric version
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
No worries. I zing gently, if at all.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like I see more of the opposite -- some kind of joy/satisfaction in being COMPLETELY OUTRAGED that out of the countless records released in the past decade, some bunch of DOUCHEBAGS on some WEBSITE likes basically the same type of stuff as you but in a SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT ORDER, the idiots
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
xxp well there ya have it folks.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
no way @ electric version
the rest look right though
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
30 albums that were ranked highly in the past... there is bound to be some surprising exclusions:
agaetis byrjunblueprintcarter IIIdiscoveryfuneralillinoiskid akill the moonlightsilent shoutlate registrationmerriweather ppmoon & antarcticaneon bibleperson pitchsince I left yousmilesound of silverstankoniais this it?supreme clienteleturn on the bright lightswhite bloodyankee hotel foxtrotunicornsthe driftwalkmen - you & mechemistry of lifeliars - threw us in a trench…prefuse 73love & theft
― sofatruck, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
yeah order is 100% irrelevant if you consider how the thing was compiled.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
supreme clientele will prob be there too (unless i missed it already)
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
ahh nevermind u put in there
lol I love Silent Shout but I think it's super super unlikely to make the top 20 of the decade
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
i wouldnt be surprised to see supreme clientele left off, a lot of musicwriter types jumped ship from that one to fishscale as 'best ghostface album' it seems (wrongly though!!!)
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
but I think it's super super unlikely to make the top 20 of the decade
surely it would having topped the 06 list?
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I'd be shocked if it isn't in the top 20.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
silent shout was their #1 of year for 2006, unless all the writers who voted it high that year have left or disowned it, it should at least be somewhere on this list
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like I see more of the opposite -- some kind of joy/satisfaction in being COMPLETELY OUTRAGED that out of the countless records released in the past decade, some bunch of DOUCHEBAGS on some WEBSITE likes basically the same type of stuff as you but in a SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT ORDER, the idiots― nabisco, Thursday, October 1, 2009 11:29 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― nabisco, Thursday, October 1, 2009 11:29 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yeah,
a) You can only make these claims if a certain amount of records you DO love are on the list. Thus the list supports your role as part of a demographic/movement/subculture. if you have a completely different top 200, you're probably listening to jazz or j-pop or video game music or 20th century classical and don't care what pfork has to say
b) Usually those type of "I CANT BELIEVE" people take GREAT PRIDE in BEATING the almighty pitchfork in their mind. [[insert ott retrades argument]], etc. Which is just another way of having your tastes reaffirmed. "I KNEW these dickheads wouldn't put Scott Walker."
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
Well, I don't really care either way. I like reading Pitchfork, and this list has pointed out a handful of discs I may be interested in, but have escaped my attention. I'm happy enough with that.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
xposts pointing out that Pitchfork totally loves The Knife
ha this basically goes to show how much attention I pay to Pitchfork
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
nabs,Especially since this is no question, a really good, really diverse overview of the type of music the indie world liked in the 2000s. I think anyone who has a huge problem with it is falling into one of that categories and is scared to admit it
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
(now, their totally batshit, revisionist list of music videos on the other hand...)
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
Is it possible Funeral will be #1? They are bound to have 2 Arcade Fire albums in the top 20. I may not fully agree, and maybe my perspective is skewed living in Montreal, but Funeral seems to me to be pretty watershed in the 'underground indie' scene moving towards more mainstream popularity.
― sofatruck, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
if you have a completely different top 200, you're probably listening to jazz or j-pop or video game music or 20th century classical
Or pop and r&b LOL.
― lou, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
Usually those type of "I CANT BELIEVE" people take GREAT PRIDE in BEATING the almighty pitchfork in their mind. [[insert ott retrades argument]], etc. Which is just another way of having your tastes reaffirmed. "I KNEW these dickheads wouldn't put Scott Walker."
OTM
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
Calling Pfork "idiots" for failing to rank a record is really just as bad as kshighway-types swallowing everything they say. They're both ploys to justify your own opinions and being comfortable in your skin--funny since it's a genre of music and criticism generally formed by people who aren't comfortable in their own skin.
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
sofatruck even though i'm also from montreal i can tell you now with 100% certainty that neon bible will not be in the top 20. however good it is, it is dissapointing as a follow-up to funeral and most ppl outside of montreal realize this. it's true everyone in town still freaked out about it, and i totally agree that funeral was the first really huge breakthrough indie rock album of the decade and is contender for #1. neon bible could've been somewhere else on the list, but not top 20.
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
no, you're right on those points, Whiney -- it's just amusing to see how livid people will claim to be that one of their top-10 choices ranked in the mid-30s, or something. but surely sometimes it's just as simple as people whose sense of what's huge and awesome and important is just unique -- say, people who attach really strongly to a small slice of stuff, and don't necessarily follow other stuff broadly enough to expect the things that, you know, other people care about. I mean, we often make this assumption on the internet that everyone knows everything and is all savvy about other opinions and whatnot, but that's ... not true.
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
going through my old mp3s really makes me hope someone at Pitchfork goes for gonzo laughs and slides Marissa Marchant into the top 10 somehow
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
kshighway-types
Speaking of which, whatever happened to this dude? I'd have thought he'd be all over this.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
either he didn't actually exist or he decided he didn't want to put up with assholes
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
too many people were nice to kshighway and sock master got bored
― mark cl, Wednesday, September 30, 2009 3:39 PM
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:54 (fifteen years ago)
samosa, I am in total agreement that Neon Bible was a disappointment, and it certainly wouldn't be in my personal top 20 or even 100 of the decade, but it does surprise me that it would be in their top 200.
― sofatruck, Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
Statistically, these will most likely be included in the top 20 albums:
Radiohead – Kid A (#1, 2000; #1, 2000-04)Jay-Z – The Blueprint (#2, 2000-04)Interpol – Turn on the Bright Lights (#1, 2002; #3, 2000-04)Outkast – Stankonia (#4, 2000-04)The Avalanches – Since I Left You (#3, 2001; #5, 2000-04)Sigur Ros – Agaetis Byrjun (#2, 2000; #6, 2000-04)Modest Mouse – The Moon and Antarctica (#3, 2000; #7, 2000-04)The White Stripes – White Blood Cells (#8, 2001; #8, 2000-04)Wilco – Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (#2, 2002; #11, 2000-04)Daft Punk – Discovery (#12, 2000-04)Spoon – Kill the Moonlight (#6, 2002; #14, 2000-04)The Strokes – Is This It (#15, 2001; #16, 2000-04)Ghostface Killah – Supreme Clientele (#19, 2000-04)The Arcade Fire – Funeral (#1, 2004; #45, 2000-04)Sufjan Stevens – Illinois (#1, 2005)Kanye West – Late Registration (#2, 2005)The Knife – Silent Shout (#1, 2006)Panda Bear – Person Pitch (#1, 2007)LCD Soundsystem – Sound of Silver (#2, 2007)Animal Collective – Merriweather Post Pavilion (projected #1, 2009)
Sad, but these are the close outliers:
The Books – The Lemon of Pink (#2, 2003; #20, 2000-04)Prefuse 73 – One Word Extinguisher (#6, 2003; #51, 2000-04)The Unicorns – Who Will Cut Our Hair When We’re Gone? (#10, 2003)Brian Wilson – Smile (#5, 2004; #25, 2000-04)Deerhoof – The Runners Four (#6, 2005)Boris – Pink (#9, 2006)Scott Walker – The Drift (#10, 2006)Lil Wayne – Tha Carter III (#11, 2008)
And, c'mon guys, as much as I'd love to see Kish Kash or Under Construction be included... it just isn't going to happen at this point. Too many other albums that "deserve" inclusion, based on these past rankings.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
Tomorrow is gonna be like christmas day for ilxor
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
i hope pitchfork gets him at least *one* sweater
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
Let's go back to posting the funniest excerpts from the album blurbs, that Clipse one is pure gold.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
<I AM NOT JUDGING YOU>God the fucking Avalanches, who gives a shit. Who said that piece of shit crate-digging abortion mattered at all? Did "Motoring Britain" make your top 500,000 songs of the decade?</I AM NOT JUDGING YOU>
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:06 (fifteen years ago)
The Books – The Lemon of Pink (#2, 2003; #20, 2000-04)
These guys seem genuinely nice, and this disc is fantastic (and pretty forward thinking/innovative). I'd like to see this disc in the top 20, but I'm not hopeful.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
I had to check the bottom of this post to make sure this wasn't me.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
xp yea it is a pretty awesome album - might be in the top 20 - the first one made it in & it's kind of accepted that 'lemon of pink' is the more polished, complete statement, more or less their best work
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
The Books aged as well as Four Tet and Hrvatski. Which is to say not well in the extreme.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:11 (fifteen years ago)
I still love their albums. Not sure why their sound wouldn't age well.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
<I AM NOT JUDGING YOU>God the fucking Avalanches, who gives a shit. Who said that piece of shit crate-digging abortion mattered at all? Did "Motoring Britain" make your top 500,000 songs of the decade?</I AM NOT JUDGING YOU>― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, October 1, 2009 12:06 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, October 1, 2009 12:06 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Talk to me about Burial in nine years
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
might be in the top 20 - the first one made it in & it's kind of accepted that 'lemon of pink' is the more polished, complete statement, more or less their best work
If Lemon makes it into the top 20 (which I'd also enjoy), then I'd be curious to know what would be excluded from its place.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know who hrvatski is but i don't really think the books sound 'dated' at all. maybe they haven't 'aged well' in terms of their popularity (tho this probably has a lot more to do w/ the fact that they haven't released an album since 2005) but there's nothing about their sound that makes me think "totally early 00s, wow shit sounds old as hell now"
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
Hrvatski/Kid606 has aged better than the Books/Four Tet since they kind of have the abrasiveness/simplicity of punk on their side
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
I'll post about Safety Scissors some more
New one early next yr, I believe. (xp re: Books disc)
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
That whole microcosm (lol u still call it "lap-pop" Rob Mitchum) is just the sound of mice pooping.
Whiney you are OTM re: Burial but I think that's sort of the Cure's Faith for this decade and will hold up. At least as well as Squarepusher's debut, or Seefeel's Succour. Beloved by a select few.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
Four Tet has aged very, very well.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
I think Burial (and dubstep) will age just fine, too.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
i'm sure the three people that actually listen to it will agree
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
you stfu now
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
the only reason it's not gonna be a punchline funnier than "grime" in two years is because Vice didn't jump on it
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
I think the problem with the Books, at least vis a vis lists like this, is that they've never released a front-to-back Great Album. I really like all three of the ones they've released, but they all feel sort of minor. (Possibly this has something to do with their technique -- each album has all these wonderful fragments, but the whole rarely adds up to more than the sum of its parts.)
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
Untrue really felt like Blue Lines to me when it was happening. Great crossover moment.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
This is some great comments baiting btw, bloggas take note
http://www.brooklynvegan.com/archives/2009/10/how_many_of_the.html
― make the trap say YAY! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
I love that every time I expand this thread it goes directly to this:
― crutboard dudes get subway, totally (J0rdan S.), Monday, August 10, 2009 4:36 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― kshighway, Monday, August 10, 2009 4:40 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark
― Moreno, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
"...is waylaid by an empirical notion: that the internet is somehow a phenomenological bootstrap for Animal Collective's success. This is an easy mistake, because the band has thrived along- and inside the internet. The reality is that the members of this band can better afford to embody the independence critics and suspicious listeners so often equate with authenticity. And the longer an act is able to sustain said independence, the more credit and credibility they are extended. This was true in the print era, and it's true today, but it is a more difficult trick, because there is almost no money generated by the cycle of performing, recording and releasing music. With a somehow ever-expanding discography reinforcing their status as a Real Band, and a subtly commercial musical evolution expanding their audience with each release, Animal Collective's brilliant career is a masterstroke in long-tail marketing: the only example yet of a band buying out the venue in the digital age."
MPP #1 4EVA
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
Wavves #1 album of the decade-- Posted by Anonymous | October 1, 2009
-- Posted by Anonymous | October 1, 2009
You heard it here first.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
Untrue will age approximately as well as Blue Lines, Dummy, Boy in Da Corner... all stand as the premiere album-length statement for a once-fashionable genre.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
guys lemon of pink isn't making it the thought for food blurb said that that was their best record and it was right
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
i think MPP will be #1
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
My assumed dark horses for #1 (if Kid A happens to slip down the list):
DiscoveryFuneralSilent ShoutPerson PitchSound of SilverMerriweather
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
single of 00s from 2000 and album of 00s from 2009, think about it yeah
― modescalator (blueski), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
But see, Merriweather isn't as good as Kid A -- undeserved.
Discovery and Silent Shout are both better albums, and I would be thrilled if either (or both) managed to pull off the upset.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
that's like, your opinion man
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
I think this would make a killer (and well ranked) top five:
1) Silent Shout2) Kid A3) Discovery4) The Blueprint5) Funeral
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
how many more times are you gonna post the names of those albums on this thread?
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
fucking seriously
― fork: the bother white meat (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
"Whiney," indeed...
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think they should make Fluorescent Grey EP #1 just for an hour to fuck with everyone
― Evan, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
i really have never been sure what this thread is for but i love it anyway
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
I don't have any prior knowledge of the outcomes here, but Books-wise, think of it from a voting standpoint: they're not quite the type of act where lots of people will put two of their albums on a ballot, right? This is sort of what I was alluding to upthread, about how it's never just personal taste versus some "objective" ranking -- there are all these considerations of how likely the thing is to get on the list either way, and what "type" of record/act you're thinking about and where you'd normally see it fitting in, and subconscious consensus issues about what feels like a useful vote versus a weird or "wasted" vote, and mild strategy in terms of what votes will do ... this stuff inevitably goes into ballots, not in any weird or vexed or sinister way, but just such that lots of people who like the Books might simply pick which of those albums they like better, stump for that one, and feel satisfied that the group made the list.
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:51 (fifteen years ago)
(haha and I say that as someone who put in honest but totally irrelevant votes for stuff like tatu and Brandy!)
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
aw, tatu
― tony j/o (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
every TATU album >> "Kid A"
I couldn't be more serious
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
getting a tattoo > > getting a tattoo while listening to Kid A
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:11 (fifteen years ago)
list made me listen to In Rainbows again. Turns out it's pretty good!
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
weird fishes...
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, take that one off and replace it with the avalanches. That record is so far from what I listen to, it completely slipped my mind.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
I did like Mark's blurb for that record, because it strikes me as true for me personally and probably true in general -- there was something about the album (and possibly its timing) that I think managed to rope in plenty of folks who'd never entirely bought the band's alleged greatness in the past. It seemed to shrug off Being-Radiohead, somehow, and just be good in some more general way.
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
sorry, xpost -- that's re: In Rainbows, obv
it's my fave Radiohead album -- i like the band, but am not a superfan though.
― tylerw, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, probably mine, too.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:45 (fifteen years ago)
Mine, too. As I've said before, I prefer warm, personable Radiohead to cold, robotic Radiohead.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
I like warm, unreasonable Radiohead, which is probably why I like Hail to the Thief so much.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:47 (fifteen years ago)
I like Amnesiac a lot. Kid A is probably my 2nd favorite. I hate Animal Collective (no offense).
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:50 (fifteen years ago)
HTTT has really grown on me (tho I've always loved There There, one of the decade's best rock songs).
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago)
Never cared for HTTT, which is why I never really gave In Rainbows a chance. I can try to reassess, but it's absence from this definitive list confirms my initial response so I see no need to. I tried MPP again today, but just can't make it past Blueish. 'My Girls' (specifically, the AAAOOOWWW) might be the musical moment of the year, but a lot of it is snoozeville.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
HTTT/In Rainbows: Very -- very -- different vibe.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:01 (fifteen years ago)
I never quite understood all the relative dislike for Hail To The Thief. It's got some clunkers like We Suck Young Blood, but the majority of it is totally awesome, as the kids say.
I'm trying with Animal Collective. And there are half a dozen songs by them I love. The rest, not so much. My favorite song is Cuckoo Cuckoo.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:06 (fifteen years ago)
I decided a couple years ago that I just like Sung Tongs, and it has nothing to do with Animal Collective really, and that simplified the whole thing for me.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:09 (fifteen years ago)
I am a little bit that way -- Sung Tongs is by far my favorite of theirs -- but I do really like plenty of their other stuff as well.
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
^^^^ This.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
They'll have a killer greatest hits record pretty soon (as long as I get to choose the songs)
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
1. YOUR COMPUTER
― tony j/o (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
It had better have Fitter Happier on it, or it's no greatest hits record.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
hah xp
― mark cl, Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
lol whiney
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
NO REALLY, IT'S YOUR COMPUTER
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
^^by this do you mean they're going to do a SPIN and not put an album in first place?
― Dan S, Thursday, 1 October 2009 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
no, he's just addressing dominique leone
― nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
I am pretty sure Foetopsy's In the Bathroom is the #1. No inside information or anything, just a very strong hunch.
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 October 2009 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
I have issues with how HTTT was mixed. Like in Sit Down. Stand Up. The centrality of the beats on that is RONG, as it's the PIANO that makes the song. Or like the guitar solo in There There which sounds kind of brittle compared to the way it sounds live. etc.
― Turangalila, Thursday, 1 October 2009 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
That's funny. My mole from deep inside PFM headquarters tell me that The Garden State soundtrack is #1, and that upon reaching the end of the list a virus makes your computer freeze. I plan on looking at 20-1 from a friend's computer.
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:03 (fifteen years ago)
revised full top twenty prediction in no partic order. allowing there are no big surprises and those missy and ghostface albums got on the list at all i think this is going to be it.
arcade fire - funeralmia - kalalcd soundsystem - sound of silveroutkast - stankoniaghostface killah - supreme clientelewilco - yankee hotel foxtrotradiohead - kid ajay z - the blueprintmissy elliot - under constructionthe srokes - is this itwhite stripes - white blood cellsthe knife - silent shoutanimal collective - merriweather post pavilionpanda bear - person pitchinterpol debutlil wayne - carter 3sigur ros - agaetis byrjunavalanches - since i left youkanye west - late registrationdaft punk - discovery
― samosa gibreel, Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:34 (fifteen years ago)
i love the srokes
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:42 (fifteen years ago)
kala already charted.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:43 (fifteen years ago)
back to the drawing board, samosa gibreel
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:46 (fifteen years ago)
― rather shipped (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:48 (fifteen years ago)
back to the drowning broad
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 00:38 (fifteen years ago)
oh dear, C3 hasn't placed yet? Thats's really in anyone's top 20?
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think "Dear Catastrophe Waitress" placed.
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 00:55 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think it will
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 01:08 (fifteen years ago)
That is an outrage!
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 01:09 (fifteen years ago)
we're all forgetting about this seminal and era-defining work:
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/7155/stardustweare.jpg
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 01:15 (fifteen years ago)
Take Kala out from that samosa's list (by the way how the heck is that so low?) and sub in Love and Theft and I think we're ready to go. I have faith that the pitchfork kids will do the right thing and give Bob his due for making the best record of the decade.
Top 5 prediction, in no order...Meriweather PostIllinoisWhite Blood CellsKid AStankonia
― kornrulez6969, Friday, 2 October 2009 01:36 (fifteen years ago)
andrew wk write-up was otm
― ogmor, Friday, 2 October 2009 01:40 (fifteen years ago)
Is it just a P4k thing, or do most people rate White Blood Cells above Elephant?
― Mordy, Friday, 2 October 2009 03:57 (fifteen years ago)
i certainly do
― i'm the unban spaceman (electricsound), Friday, 2 October 2009 04:03 (fifteen years ago)
the moon & antarctica will def be there.. they gave it a 10.0.
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 04:16 (fifteen years ago)
oh wait... 9.8?? my brain is eff'd
I just looked it up.. It was #50 for Rolling Stone and #13 for pitchfork.. I'm usually better at this stuff.
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 04:28 (fifteen years ago)
It's entirely possible for Discovery to take #1 since Radiohead votes will be split amongst 3 or 4 albums, while Daft Punk had 1 HUGE album. Lots of people voting for In Rainbows prolly didn't bother also voting for Kid A.
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 04:29 (fifteen years ago)
While seeing if 20-1 had been posted I found an interview with one of the guys from Vampire Weekend. I'll be damned if those guys aren't actually likable; they're like a rich, handsome guy that you want to hate but once you get to know the him you're like "he's so funny and sweet-natured -- hell, no wonder women want to marry him."
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 04:46 (fifteen years ago)
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 04:53 (fifteen years ago)
can a mod put that image under the thread title?
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 04:54 (fifteen years ago)
like that?
― i'm the unban spaceman (electricsound), Friday, 2 October 2009 04:57 (fifteen years ago)
haha yes thank you jim <3 <3
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 04:58 (fifteen years ago)
lolllllllll
― got that candy zing (Tape Store), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:00 (fifteen years ago)
just saw #20 and i like it so far
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:00 (fifteen years ago)
i look forward to the rest of this thread
― got that candy zing (Tape Store), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:01 (fifteen years ago)
it's up now. No surprise at no.1
― Dan S, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:01 (fifteen years ago)
supreme clientele for #1
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:01 (fifteen years ago)
haha what a bunch of taste-deficent losers
― unable to correctly pronounce comedy internet nickname (King Boy Pato), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:04 (fifteen years ago)
The real story was the resonance of elliptical songs like "I Am Trying to Break Your Heart", "Ashes of American Flags", and "Jesus, Etc.", which often reduced crowds to hushed silence once 9/11 attached a real world frame to Tweedy's cryptic lyrics.
― got that candy zing (Tape Store), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:05 (fifteen years ago)
good choices.. i like the top 100 overall..
200-101 is snooze city
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:06 (fifteen years ago)
i could really go for some ice cream
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:07 (fifteen years ago)
feelin' some ben & jerry up in this area
― unable to correctly pronounce comedy internet nickname (King Boy Pato), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:08 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKej6H4yP5wHaagen Dazs: Where Legends Are Born
― got that candy zing (Tape Store), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:13 (fifteen years ago)
i love that the top 10 is so extremely dominated by 2000-2001 (8 out of the 10 if you count YHF as 2001)
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:15 (fifteen years ago)
and 13 of the top 20 from 2000-2002
― Dan S, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j05fJPvfJ0g
― billstevejim, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:20 (fifteen years ago)
this feels like kerry/bush 04
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
I'm fine with the choice for Kid A. It's not my favorite album of the decade, just like Revolver/Pet Sounds aren't my favorite albums of all time, but if you're going to crown one album, you could do a lot worse..
― horst du sie noch, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:26 (fifteen years ago)
wtf, you guys scared me for a second that ilx had somehow decided to put banner ads in the last few hours
― 2009 Nominee, Best African (Whitey on the Moon), Friday, 2 October 2009 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
I like it and all, but Yankee Hotel Foxtrot in the top 5 is stunningly ridiculous
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
Supreme Clientele review was great though and I was happy with its placement
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:35 (fifteen years ago)
not sure what he's trying to say at the end of the Supreme Clientele blurb
― Dan S, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:37 (fifteen years ago)
that is some sauce xxpost
― wilter, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:38 (fifteen years ago)
lolllllll
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:42 (fifteen years ago)
xpost that Ghostface beat a bunch of heads-up-their-asses indie rappers striving for intellectualism at their own game while retaining impeccable cred?
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
i guess. not very clearly expressed
― Dan S, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
and + jams
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
now that i read it again it really wasn't but i don't think that point is made often enough
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:47 (fifteen years ago)
top 10 looks like a p4k list from backkkk in the day
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:49 (fifteen years ago)
If Pitchfork ever bumps into "Funeral" in a hotel lobby I expect the conversation to be of the "No, it was you who put me on the map!" nature.
On an only slightly more serious note, I think "Funeral" captured and foreshadowed the last half of this decade, both sonically and socially, just as well or better than "Kid A" did the first part. Although, to be honest, something about listening to "Kid A" really does sound like browsing a creepy part of the internet circa 2001 (and I didn't even hear the album until 2004, so.)
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
I think "Funeral" captured and foreshadowed the last half of this decade, both sonically and socially, just as well or better than "Kid A" did the first part.
For a very small, defined sliver of pop culture.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 2 October 2009 05:54 (fifteen years ago)
But that could be said for so much entertainment and art these days. What's the number one song right now, anyway?
And one could make a thoughtful essay or blurb arguing that Funeral's secular hymns and spiritual neediness foreshadowed the quasi-religious crusade that young people built around a presidential candidate with ecumenical appeal. The alienation on the album almost works as the other side to Kid A's coin.
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
But that could be said for so much entertainment and art these days.
Oh definitely, I wouldn't argue with that a bit.
What's the number one song right now, anyway?
I probably haven't known that at any given time since the 1980s.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
It's I Gotta Feeling, and has been for about 13 weeks now, isn't it?
― Dan S, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
In 2009 there's no clear cut way of knowing what the number one song is in America's heart, outside of torturing Casey Kasem with a screwdriver, and I'm not about to do that.
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
And the huge New York Times piece on Arcade Fire will be all "What the fuck guys?!"
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
kid a for the win is hulla boring, and i didn't even like the write up. also it's like the twelth time they've written a kid a album of the year/decade or 10.0 review.
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:27 (fifteen years ago)
also it seems like every single other blurb somehow mentioned the internet, and while yeah of course that was the really big defining cultural technological shift of the decade, i think it would be nice if albums were contextualized wrt music rather than "arular was the first true blog hyped success."
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:33 (fifteen years ago)
"Pitchfork Media Counts Down Its Ten Most Memorable 'Kid A' Blurbs" is what the Onion piece will be.
Blurbs, as a form of writing, belong more to puff pieces than they do criticism, so, to be fair, it's hard to stylistically blow-up the thing you're writing about and then be very analytical and level-headed about it the next sentence.
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:41 (fifteen years ago)
i kind of dont agree -- lots of stuff on this list is more about criticism than it is about 'puff pieces' -- i was actually thinking that a remarkably large % of this stuff is that way esp when compared to print magazines past
― xhuxk mangione (deej), Friday, 2 October 2009 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sure this all comes down to voting and whatnot, but something about the fact that all the albums that placed highly being already well-canonized early-decade records strikes as deeply lazy and boring.
― suggestbannn/the lorax below (The Reverend), Friday, 2 October 2009 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
i kind of dont agree -- lots of stuff on this list is more about criticism than it is about 'puff pieces' --
All I meant was that blurbs, by nature, were originally designed to be enthusiastically and extravagantly written, so a lot of the time the writer is trying to convey importance and greatness more than a short, heady criticism. xpost
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
it is lazy and boring, but the first half of the '00s also kicks the second half's ass so hard it's ridiculous
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:04 (fifteen years ago)
We'll see. We're still living through the second half and it takes a few years for yr Disco Infernos to be claimed and for appreciation of oppressively popular bands and genres to go away so they can be liked or reevaluated again. 1990-1994 probably seemed like a landslide from the perspective of 1999, and the same analogy holds true for prob every decade in rock.
― Cunga, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:09 (fifteen years ago)
the kids of tomorrow must defend themselves against the 00s
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:10 (fifteen years ago)
tbf, i bet every single person who posts here loves at least one record in the top 20
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:19 (fifteen years ago)
i own 9 of them, 'loves' might be pushing it though
― i'm the unban spaceman (electricsound), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:21 (fifteen years ago)
I love three and a half of them!
― Mordy, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:21 (fifteen years ago)
Damn, CNN.com wrote a a pretty serious story about the pitchfork decade list
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:24 (fifteen years ago)
nope.
― somewhere a poll is missing its wacky write-in vote (sarahel), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:30 (fifteen years ago)
ilxor used maths to score a perfect 20/20!
Statistically, these will most likely be included in the top 20 albums:Radiohead – Kid A (#1, 2000; #1, 2000-04)Jay-Z – The Blueprint (#2, 2000-04)Interpol – Turn on the Bright Lights (#1, 2002; #3, 2000-04)Outkast – Stankonia (#4, 2000-04)The Avalanches – Since I Left You (#3, 2001; #5, 2000-04)Sigur Ros – Agaetis Byrjun (#2, 2000; #6, 2000-04)Modest Mouse – The Moon and Antarctica (#3, 2000; #7, 2000-04)The White Stripes – White Blood Cells (#8, 2001; #8, 2000-04)Wilco – Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (#2, 2002; #11, 2000-04)Daft Punk – Discovery (#12, 2000-04)Spoon – Kill the Moonlight (#6, 2002; #14, 2000-04)The Strokes – Is This It (#15, 2001; #16, 2000-04)Ghostface Killah – Supreme Clientele (#19, 2000-04)The Arcade Fire – Funeral (#1, 2004; #45, 2000-04)Sufjan Stevens – Illinois (#1, 2005)Kanye West – Late Registration (#2, 2005)The Knife – Silent Shout (#1, 2006)Panda Bear – Person Pitch (#1, 2007)LCD Soundsystem – Sound of Silver (#2, 2007)Animal Collective – Merriweather Post Pavilion (projected #1, 2009)
I definitely would have enjoyed a surprise or two to liven up the procedurals, but this was based on a poll of P4K contributors, & the top-20 is essentially the P4K canon.. Some really good writing in some of the blurbs. Nabisco's Silent Shout & Tom E's Discovery were standouts imo.
Glaring omissions from the entire list include a lot of elder statesmen - Brian Wilson, Kate Bush, Dylan, Scott W, etc. Absence of big Missy & Liars albums is baffling. Personal beefs: UGK, Bark Psychosis, Calexico
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:32 (fifteen years ago)
the first half of the '00s also kicks the second half's ass so hard it's ridiculous
Suggest Ban Permalink― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Friday, October 2, 2009 12:04 AM Bookmark
08. Sigur RósÁgætis Byrjun[Smekkleysa; 2000]
06. Modest MouseThe Moon & Antarctica[Epic; 2000]
04. WilcoYankee Hotel Foxtrot[Nonesuch; 2002]
02. Arcade FireFuneral[Merge; 2004]
Man, the late 2000s are just gettin smoked there.
― suggestbannn/the lorax below (The Reverend), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:33 (fifteen years ago)
http://i35.tinypic.com/21ccdn9.gif
― Turangalila, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
i wonder how kshighway feels about this list
― een, Friday, 2 October 2009 07:52 (fifteen years ago)
the opinion of the kshighway sock i rejected registration from will have to wait sadly
― i'm the unban spaceman (electricsound), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:53 (fifteen years ago)
Fucking Ágætis Byrjun wtf.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 07:56 (fifteen years ago)
The point upthread about both the PFM list and the (Uncut?) list reading like "reader lists" rather than "writer lists" is a REALLY interesting one; maybe it's just that I've been involved in the industry in vague ways, maybe it's the increasing awareness of cultural history that the internet provides, maybe it's that we're all so savvy now that we have indexed and year-ordered lists in our iTunes, but there's a real dearth of surprise critic faves on these lists. i.e. stuff like Bark Psychosis, or The Drift, or The Necks, or... etc etc etc ad infinitum. And maybe it's churlish to mention that, but I'd hope, as a reader, that in any end-of-year or end-of-decade list, there ought to be stuff I've never heard of, tantalising mysteries that make me want to investigate. Maybe it's the size of the pools polled (larger pools will always produce a more dull consensus, possibly), maybe it's that in the 00s music journalism has been written by demographics for demographics in a more focused way than ever before, maybe it's that the whole media in the 00s is seeking to pander to it's audience that much more in order to not scare it off...
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 08:04 (fifteen years ago)
or maybe you're overthinking it
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:06 (fifteen years ago)
This IS ILM, right?
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 08:06 (fifteen years ago)
Overthinking About Pop Music.
yeah and I like that! it's just...overthinking about how a *list* was made and what it MEANSSSSS. I don't mean to single you out here, this thread has 2796 posts n'all.
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:09 (fifteen years ago)
I apologise for finding developments in a field I have worked in interesting and wanting to talk about it.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 08:12 (fifteen years ago)
the field of lists?
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:13 (fifteen years ago)
I'd hope, as a reader, that in any end-of-year or end-of-decade list, there ought to be stuff I've never heard of, tantalising mysteries that make me want to investigate.
This list did exactly that for me. As I'd expect, given how easy it is to access music this decade -- via MySpace, LaLa, eMusic, and so forth -- the titles I had yet to investigate were those toward the middle and bottom of the list (i.e., those that hadn't received tremendous attention previously). Now I'll seek them out and listen to them.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 08:15 (fifteen years ago)
That bar at the top of the thread makes me want to seek out and investigate some Haagen-Dazs.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 08:17 (fifteen years ago)
haha yeah haagen dazs got hella free advertising from this thread
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:18 (fifteen years ago)
It's a little fudged, as it was originally released in 1999. But Rolling Stone's number one album of the 80s (at the time, anyway) was London Calling, released in 1979. So whatever... but the stat nerd in me is cringing.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:20 (fifteen years ago)
There's a top 10 disc I haven't heard, actually.
Not sure I've heard all of the Modest Mouse disc, either, but that's because the soundscans irritate me so much I can't get through them all. I don't get the appeal of that band at all.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 08:22 (fifteen years ago)
Modest Mouse actually got more tolerable (to me, at least) the more famous they got. The two most recent albums are my favorites. I still wouldn't consider myself a stan, though.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 2 October 2009 08:32 (fifteen years ago)
Listening to the samples again, the Modest Mouse album is better (less irritating) than I remembered. I hated the Good News album, tho. Sold it to my used record shop for $1.00, I think.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 08:36 (fifteen years ago)
Well I've helped coordinate quite a few lists compiled by music journalists, yes.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 08:41 (fifteen years ago)
Nick, I think you're falling into the "golden age" trap, as most of your criticisms could easily be levelled at print magazine polls way before the internet and the 00's.That said, I guess it does seem impossible today that there might be a record loved by critics but unknown to the general public.
― tomofthenest, Friday, 2 October 2009 09:35 (fifteen years ago)
What 2009 albums would have made it if released a couple years earlier? Fever Ray? Maxwell? xx?
― I'M LEGALLY A MIDGET (a hoy hoy), Friday, 2 October 2009 09:37 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I'm aware I'm a couple of years out of things and reminiscing.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
This list reminded me why I checked out around 2002. I dislike nearly every album in this top 20. Sigur Ros makes the top ten for an entire decade? No fucking thanks.
― Soundslike, Friday, 2 October 2009 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
There's a surprising lack of outrage over the worst (by far) of Sigur Ros' four 2000's albums coming in at #8. But then again, this list claims that *most* acts got steadily worse as the decade progressed (Animal Collective, incl. Panda Bear, are a notable exception).
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 10:23 (fifteen years ago)
Person Pitch ending up ahead of AC (with their worst album placing highest obviously) really sums up how little sense this list has made to me. that and this:
"i think it would be nice if albums were contextualized wrt music rather than "arular was the first true blog hyped success."
― samosa gibreel, den 2 oktober 2009 08:33 (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink"
― sonderangerbot, Friday, 2 October 2009 10:51 (fifteen years ago)
re:
come on, how many people in the USA or UK knew about Sigur Ros and that album in 1999.
In the UK it was DJ John Kennedy on Xfm 104.9 that was a champion of Sigur Ros and that was just before the album got released in the UK in the Autumn of 2000.
― djmartian, Friday, 2 October 2009 11:00 (fifteen years ago)
imma let you finish, but
late registration kinda sucksmpp suckswhite blood cells sucksperson pitch really sucksmodest mouse totally fuckin' sucksyhf sucksfuneral sucks
i guess everything else is decent
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
Modest Mouse does totally f---n' suck.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
It upsets me that Pitchfork didn't ensure that its top 200 list matched my own top 200 list.
they shoulda called you--i mean you were available right?
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
I would have asked for a continuance of an upcoming trial, if need be.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
Echoing above posts on YHF's obstinate "importance," which I couldn't put a finger on back then and am nonplussed anyone even remembers in 2009 but as an embarrassing paean to how far in the wrong you can be about something.
MPP should have been #1. The list serves only to generate discussion vis a vis Pitchfork's brand in contrast with others. To fall into the trap of re-canonizing the canon was a mistake five years ago. Today, it's a reputational disaster. You are what you hype.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
damn ur really makin me think
― fleetwood (max), Friday, 2 October 2009 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
it's a reputational disaster
― just sayin, Friday, 2 October 2009 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
why do certain yanks rate mediocre / unremarkable bands like Spoon and Modest Mouse so highly?
― djmartian, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
to generate discussion vis-a-vis our brands in contrast with others
― fleetwood (max), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
Spoon are awesome, djmartian. About the best thing in the top 20.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
All I can say is Love and Theft better be in the top 20, or I may be forced to write them a sternly worded letter.― kornrulez6969, Thursday, October 1, 2009
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, October 1, 2009
Are you working on your letter yet? Let us help you compose it!
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
what a reputational disaster for pitchfork
― jabba hands, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
Dear tone-deaf "tastemakers":
Echoing above posts on YHFMPP's obstinate "importance," which I couldn't put a finger on back then and am nonplussed anyone even remembers in October 2009 but as an embarrassing paean to how far in the wrong you can be about something...
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:53 (9 minutes ago) Bookmark
fixed... obviously could have done this with any record I didn't like.
― tomofthenest, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
I'm listening to "Nautical Disaster" by Tragically Hip now ... thanks for the tip.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Re: "Agaetis Byrjun" being released in 1999, I think the P&J custom of "voting for the album/song in the year it made the most impact" is more important that the exact release date.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
massive lolz
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
If people are picking holes in the Uncut and Pitchfork lists - just imagine the laughter awaiting 00s lists from Rolling Stone, NME, Q, Spin etc
― djmartian, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno, i would have liked to see more aging boomers and hot topic stars in this list
― da croupier, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
COME ON UP FOR THE RISING!
Mark R, if you are still around these parts, your Kid A blurb is fucking excellent
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
at least with NME it seems less predictable which bag of shite they'll put at #1 now (btw i like Kid A but whatever)...probably Arctic Monkeys tho?
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
Southall: I hardly think we are pandering to our audience. One thing that a lot of you all, those of you who have been watching P4k very closely all decade and who spend som much time discussing music on the internet forget, is that you guys are the tip of the audience iceberg. How many people regularly congregate here, or at SOMB or lostatsea or Metacritic or HPN or DIS or whatever forums? I mean regularly: A few thousand? At the absolute most 10,000? OK, maybe the site doesn't surprise those people-- how could it at this point without being untruthful in some ways? Meanwhile, more than 2 million computers logged onto P4k over each of the past two months. We obliterated our pageview record last month, a record that was set the month before. I don't bring that up to be a dick but to point out that the vast, vast majority of the people coming to the site have never head *of* many of the records in our top 200, let alone heard them. It's still a difficult, eclectic, weird, nonmainstream selection of music to most people; once Stereogum posts something today, those comments will be about how pretentious and phony it is precisely because some of it is eclectic and weird to them. And I suspect those individuals are also readers who are more in tune to a larger amount of music than the "average" reader. (sorry to be reductive, obv not everyone fits in neat little categories like this.)
At first I was little bummed that all of those online forums, from what I saw, could rather easily nail down our top 20; but actually I think it's some sort of compliment. We've created a little part of the Internet in which records by the Knife, Avalanches, Panda Bear, Spoon, Ghostface, are to people "obvious" top 20 of the decade material. And yet they won't be anywhere else I imagine (the Knife will be with Sweden's Sonic Magazine, but nowhere else in the US/UK). I don't know what that means, but at the very least it means people pay very close attention to what we do. Including Nick, I guess, you.
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
He hits at exactly what I hate about "Kid A" -- other bands made catchier/dancier/more creative/etc. music, but "Kid A" "captured the complex feeling of the era", ergo, it wins. That's just projecting a load of social significance onto the album, which has nothing to do with the quality of the music itself.
I mean, if we're going to talk about e.g. the "gorgeous Brian Eno-like interlude of 'Treefingers'", then if this is the album of the decade then we should be talking about one of the greatest ambient pieces ever recorded. But it's not, and I don't think many people would claim that it is. How did the "drones and the hissy beats in 'Idioteque'" manage to capture the times any better than Autechre did with exactly the same drones and hissy beats recorded seven years earlier?
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:17 (fifteen years ago)
― etaeoe, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
Because Radiohead took those Autechre beats, married them to some much more accessible pop sensibilities and exposed them to a much wider audience right at the same time that mainstream America was figuring out how to use the Internet as a research tool and a source for music files.
This shouldn't be rocket science but it's NEVER just the music that makes a particular album great or memorable to a large number of people; it also has to occur at the right time and the right place. That is precisely what happened to Kid A. Is it highly derivative of a bunch of stuff I'd already heard? Yes. Had the vast majority of music critics, let alone the audience Radiohead had built off of their first three albums, heard and, more importantly, understood where that music was coming from and the emotional power it can have? No. Do I begrudge Radiohead for combining their cult of personality with someone else's musical ideas to make an album that basically checks off every box on a music critic's "best album of the decade" list? No, because I think it also happens to be a good album.
tl;dr version: lighten up and enjoy music more
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
the top 20 works pretty well as an artifact of the decade in indie sensibility, which is probably as it should be.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
also how far do you want to go - a c major chord was first played in 10000 bc on a mammoth bone piano, how does Radiohead capture any better etc etc
Personally, I think Kid A works as a coherent album and reflects its times better than anything by Autechre or Eno.
― tomofthenest, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
xp to Notimebeforetime
― tomofthenest, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
This shouldn't be rocket science but it's NEVER just the music that makes a particular album great or memorable to a large number of people; it also has to occur at the right time and the right place.
Well duh, I never claimed otherwise. There's nothing wrong with being derivative (most music is). But if you're calling something the album of the decade, and the music is derivative, then it had better be the *best* derivative music that the genre has ever heard, or close to it.
Whether Radiohead's fans knew and understood that "Idioteque" is Autechre's "Anvil Vapre" with vocals is besides the point, it's not my fault that they weren't paying attention at the time (critics have less of an excuse). But as "Decade Defining Ideas" go, "Anvil Vapre" with vocals is hardly mind-blowing and deserving of these sorts of accolades.
tl;dr version: there's a reason everybody laughed at Al Gore when he said he invented the internet
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Plus, it's fucking bullshit to boil Kid A down to ripping of someone else's old ideas/beats/soundscaping and nailing them an "accessible pop sensibility". I was listening to Autechre & Aphex at the time (I suspect most ilxors were), and I didn't pull my hair out when Kid A got all the credit. Kid A combines a distinct vision of the human present, articulated to some extent on OK Computer, with a soundscape that makes it emotionally accessible, resonant, meaningful. Undeniable, even. And I don't think that anybody was doing precisely this, or doing it anywhere near as well, prior to Kid A.
It's not bullshit, on the other hand, to talk about how Kid A "captured the complex feeling of the era". The record isn't just "music", a bunch of organized noise. It's a statement about living and feeling in a particular place and time. It has a point of view, abstractly aesthetic and more immediately personal. That it spoke to so many people does suggest that the record captured something about its era. Or maybe it's the other way round: in presenting such a compelling vision of technological dehumanization, maybe it invented its era.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
and I don't even like it that much
That it spoke to so many people does suggest that the record captured something about its era. Or maybe it's the other way round: in presenting such a compelling vision of technological dehumanization, maybe it invented its era.
I don't disagree with your first statement. It's the second statement that I take issue with, I think that it plays a not-insignificant part in enhancing the album's mystique.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
You're right, Scott, that ILM is a very... I was going to say "sophisticated" but let's say "aware", slice of demographic when its comes to nonmainstream music, and yes, PFM's audience does extend massively beyond that kind of informed milieu, out into huge realms of casual audience, which is an awesome achievement. And I think PFM deals with its large audience in a much better way than many other publications of similar (or even quite a lot smaller) size manage to do in terms of not treating people like idiots. I don't pay "very close attention" to what PFM does, though, or what any music publication does actually; my interest is piqued pretty much only by big ticket events like this list. About which my main problem is purely the crushing inevitability of the album that won. I think it's terrific that, as you say, there's a corner of the internet (or do we, in 2009, mean 'world' now, given how much of the world has the internet?) that can assume Silent Shout to be a top 20 album of the decade. I don't like that album especially, but you're right; it's not gonna end up in many other comparable lists.
My problem is with Kid A's inexorable position at the summit. It's been the winner of this poll since way before the poll was taken, and, like NoTimeBefore above, I just don't think it deserves it, on either musical worth or cultural impact. And now there's a huge wide audience of PFM readers, the kids who aren't familiar with things in the way that the little enclaves like ILM are, who are going to buy the talk about Kid A's significance wholesale. I don't think it has the cultural impact outside of a very small demographic; I think the cultural impact of it exists because it's been willed into existence, by things like this list. Subjective experiences writ large, writ authoritative, and becoming shared history when they really weren't. It's not even the "Autechre / Eno / Primal Scream / whoever did it better first" thing; that's pretty irrelevant. Music journalists certainly SHOULD have known about Aphex Twin, but again, no matter. It's the "reflection of its times" thing I think is bollocks. History isn't written by the winners, it's won by the writers. If you say something often enough and loud enough, people accept it as truth.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp
You would have a more credible argument if its summation wasn't an urban legend. Also, claiming "Idioteque" is "'Anvil Vapre' with vocals" shows that you actually don't listen to music very closely:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21Zd8xPUQs8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AazG7yMTfFg
One is icy precision with iced-out melodic sine waves and vocals layered over it, the other is muddled up with distorted rumbles and pizzicato synth stings and multiple overlaid drum loops that build a much more complicated syncopated pattern that segues into sound effects; you would think someone waving the "IDM DID IT FIRST" flag as hard as you are would have noticed that.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
It's a statement about living and feeling in a particular place and time. It has a point of view, abstractly aesthetic and more immediately personal. That it spoke to so many people does suggest that the record captured something about its era. Or maybe it's the other way round: in presenting such a compelling vision of technological dehumanization, maybe it invented its era.
can be applied to 'Discovery' just as much
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
Can be applied to ANY ALBUM that people apply it to, whether it's actually 'deserving' or relevant to that statement or not.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
contenderizer viciously otm.
you know what is bullshit, btw? ian cohen's arcade fire blurb.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
That it spoke to so many people does suggest that the record captured something about its era
can be applied to any album that sold more than kid a (ie quite a lot of albums)
― lex pretend, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
I would not have been surprised by any of the top 3 albums being #1 and I don't like Arcade Fire and think that Daft Punk album is wildly overrated; that doesn't change the fact that they meant a lot to a lot of people who both write for Pitchfork and are in their audience. Kid A only really feels inevitable because it's Pitchfork's list.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
btw i basically agree w/nick but don't care enough to argue - i just wish people would stop acting like soul, hip-hop and r&b lists are "niche" while this one isn't
― lex pretend, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
re. the list being niche: the Sigur Ros write-up handled this nicely, I thought: "Punk had taught us to be skeptical of pure, unapologetic prettiness, so as underground music fans, we'd been conditioned to reject this sort of thing." P4k's "us" consists of underground music fans with a shared ethic learned from punk. So naturally its list is niche, and that's its niche, evidently.
― Euler, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
It's not even that soul, hip-hop, r'n'b etc are "niche"; it's the idea that only Kid A / Funeral is "culturally significant" in terms of saying something about the way we live now. I guess in that respect, Discovery also being in that list is a fucking great big step forwards, even though I, like Dan, think it's overrated.
If the internet's taught us ANYTHING, surely it's that "the way we live now" is SO DISPARATE, so fragmented, so "special interest", that the kinds of records that are "culturally significant" don't exist anymore. And maybe Kid A is the last one that people feel they can hang that hat on.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe that's also why dull-as-fuck comfort-blanket albums like that Bon Iver tossbag got so high.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
P4k's "us" consists of underground music fans with a shared ethic learned from punk. So naturally its list is niche, and that's its niche, evidently
i find this sad - i love a ton of underground music, i love experimentation and harshness and discordance when it's done well, but to reject softness and prettiness and femininity and populism just seems...dumb. and that's the ethic this list, which a ton of people are taking their cultural cues from, is built on?
― lex pretend, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
Thinking Guitar Hero and Rock Band are more "culturally significant" than any album of the last decade.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
a prog perspective of the 00s
Top 250 albums of the 00s on progarchives.com with at least 5 ratings http://bit.ly/12FlPZ
kid A 170 on this list
the number 1 albums of the 00s is a 2009 album (and it's NOT Animal Collective)
― djmartian, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
You're right, Scott, that ILM is a very... I was going to say "sophisticated" but let's say "aware", slice of demographic when its comes to nonmainstream music,
"Myopic" works too. Scott pretty much OTM
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:13 (fifteen years ago)
But then again, Southall OTM here
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
I wasn't referring to the fact that Gore was misquoted, but that he tried to heap credit on himself for playing a part in creating something that had been around for a long time previously, but hey, enjoy arguing with your strawman (I never said that "IDM DID IT FIRST" was the crux of my argument either, and thought I'd made that clear in my follow-up posts).
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:15 (fifteen years ago)
that was xxxxxxpost to Dan
lex, I'm with you; but I think it's important to remember what (I think) nabisco said in his article on indie: that there's tension in indie in 2009 between its punk roots and other roots/ethics (and that he hopes new ways of resolving this tension will lead to musical breakthroughs in the future).
― Euler, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
xpost uh i think dan knew what you were trying to say re: gore?
― just sayin, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, October 2, 2009 10:12 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
first sensible thing you've said on this thread.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:19 (fifteen years ago)
I think not if he's stuck on the issue of who did what first (which was never my point), but let him respond if he feels the need.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
tbh i wouldn't remotely care about this niche list if it didn't seem to have a status disproportionate to the narrowness of its niche. twitterfeed full of people talking about it, this very thread heading towards 3000 responses...i wish the lists etc which contain music i'm interested in would get so much attention.
― lex pretend, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe I'm strawmanning myself, actually; I'm imagining hordes of PFM writers all sticking Kid A at number 1 in their individual lists and having shrines in their basements to it, but maybe it's that everyone put it at 10, and had totally varied choices for their top 9s, and Kid A is the last point of consensus (if so, it's a rubbish point of consensus, still). Scott, any chance that PFM would publish individual writers' lists?
I think my main fear is lots of music journalists all utterly convinced that Kid A is AS GOOD AS MUSIC EVER GETS and that everything afterwards is merely a pale shadow. Because if anyone thinks that we might as well all go home.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
lol lex pls. realize i migrated to the internet to talk about things like this list because none of my irl friends give a fuck.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
To fall into the trap of re-canonizing the canon was a mistake five years ago. Today, it's a reputational disaster. You are what you hype.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, October 2, 2009 12:53 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/badassbuddy_com-slowburner.gif
― history mayne, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
I agree and disagree. That's all totally level-headed and fair though of course, I don't begrudge you any of those reactions or hopes naturally.
We have a pretty cynical staff, they get bored with things that are popular or obvious, and yet nine years later Kid A handily won this. Joe Tangari, who writes mostly about old soul and African records voted for it very high; Philip Sherburne, who writes mostly about techno, voted for it very high; almost everyone actually voted for it, mostly very high. The consensus was overwhelming. And maybe it's a little boring but even if we were tempted to throw a curveball just to throw a curveball, I'd be damned if I could think of how to explain in a blurb why any other album won. Wilco or Arcade Fire are a joke here; the kids at lostatsea are baffled that Daft Punk is #3; Stereogum commenters will snort at Jay-Z when they get the chance; The Knife and AC are small bands, who do things that Kid A also did, who have the same appeal in some ways, but on a much smaller scale. These are artists that arguably, with our audience, got popular in a small way because of the path Radiohead helped clear for them.
And I think it's faulty to say they have no impact outside of a "very small demographic." This was a #1 album in the U.S and UK. Radiohead has culturally impacted, for the most part, everyone in the more cultish/heavy listener sphere, plus can play large outdoor venues and pull in lots of more casual music fans. If Radiohead hasn't made a cultural impact outside of a small demo, who else did? The Strokes in the UK but not here. Off the top of my head only Kanye, Jay-Z, Outkast, and Timberlake are bigger artists than Radiohead out of everyone on our list, but did they make better records? And did they impact our readership and staff more than Radiohead? (a: no; nobody did.)
I guess it's boring. But it's not boring because this list crowned it. It's boring because they are the only band in our world that almost everyone likes to a degree, that almost everyone cares about. And not to sound corny, they earned it. As I remember it, that happened slowly and organically between 1995-2002 because of their music. The writers at the time, at the end of that run, were instead baffled by Amnesiac and hyping the Strokes and Stripes while trying to get people to give a shit about the Vines.
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
response to Nick of course.
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
also I keep saying "lostatsea" and mean "atease"
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Friday, October 2, 2009 10:21 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
dude.
twitter is "niche"
ilx is "niche"
― fleetwood (max), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
Several things are wrong with this:
1. Al Gore was trying to heap credit on himself for opening legislative pathways that led to mainstreaming the Internet to the public. He sponsored two pivotal bills that linked universities and library networks and opened the Internet to commercial traffic; without either of those, the Internet as we know it would not exist.
2. If your intent was not to argue that someone else did it first and did it better, why did you frame your argument with a bunch of examples of other people doing similar things that you thought were better?
3. It's really not Radiohead's fault that they said "we want to make an album that reflects how we feel about the coming decade" and a whole bunch of people went "oh hey, we feel that way too!" You are wholly conflating artistic intention with critical reaction.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
Off the top of my head only Kanye, Jay-Z, Outkast, and Timberlake are bigger artists than Radiohead out of everyone on our list, but did they make better records?
uh YES
― lex pretend, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
― scottpl, Friday, October 2, 2009 3:23 PM (32 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
... nick is UK and so's this board, kind of, and the narrative is more like: non-one hears of them till 'creep' is a US hit. 'the bends' is massive and is source of about six hit singles.
'ok computer' is one of the most anticipated records of the late 1990s, is a massive hit, and is voted best album of all time (i think) in q magazine in 1998.
then they shit the bed with some vaguely warp-sounding ish with added mewling.
ok j/k, but it wasn't a slow/organic thing between 1995-02, here at any rate.
― history mayne, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
can't believe Pitchfork made Al Gore's record #1
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
"Punk had taught us to be skeptical of pure, unapologetic prettiness, so as underground music fans, we'd been conditioned to reject this sort of thing." P4k's "us" consists of underground music fans with a shared ethic learned from punk. So naturally its list is niche, and that's its niche, evidently.― Euler
― Euler
OTM. That anyone would act all surprised about this amazes me. You can draw a straight line from Lester Bangs-favored late 60s/early 70s rock -- through CBGB punk and late 70s power pop -- through 80s college & 90s indie rock to get to where pitchfork is now. The group speaking ("underground"-friendly music critics, mostly white, educated & middle class) hasn't changed much, nor has the audience (same people, not making a career of it). This voice and its sphere of concerns has dominated the just-barely-sub-mainstream critical discourse on American pop for decades, and its persistence is completely predictable.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
I think it was a mistake not listing Love + Theft, even considering the Pfk brand/aesthetic/etc. But outside glaring omissions like that, it's hard for me to look at this list and complain about placement (omg, Kid A shouldn't be #1, it should really be [this other album they listed somewhere]), or about choice of album (don't they know that Our Endless Numbered Days >> The Creek Drank the Cradle). I figure anything anywhere on that list that I dig is enough of a crossover with my tastes that I'm happy (especially considering OTM'ness of earlier comment that I only read online lists to somehow affirm my own taste in light of some public post -- I feel the same way about watching the OSCARS too and seeing super-famous tho not quite mainstream screenplay writer win award over hack-famous screenplay writer).
― Mordy, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think the Kid A/2000-2002 lean in the top 10 has something to do with the fact that Pitchfork ca. 2000-2004 seemed to be a cerebral, indie-centric, avant-friendly version of the emerging '00s canon. And post-Arcade Fire pfork started trying to write their OWN canon, positioning themselves as leaders, not followers.
2000-2004 records like Kid A not only has the weight of the entire Pfork staff, but their collective memories of every early print outlet claiming it was the awesome next step of music. Everything after 2004 suffers from the "my ears are as good as anyones" spirit the internet fostered, and is basically a list of records that staffers would like to THINK are important but maybe secretly know they're not. This is why they can't FULLY put their weight behind obvious piffle like The Knife and why the list misses shit like American Idiot and System Of A Down and My Chemical Romance and 50 Cent and Bob Dylan.
If Pfork still had the same goals and mindset at the beginning of the decade that they do now, they would have never fallen for shit like the Strokes.
Not saying one way is better than the other, but i think it says a little something about why the older records on this list seem to "hold up" more. The early records are a little more universally indie and the later records are more Pitchfork(TM)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
Not that either of those ways of thinking are a bad thing. And I don't think one is preferable to the other.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
Second post will fit in a tweet = all bases covered!
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
i wish the lists etc which contain music i'm interested in would get so much attention
which lists are these?
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
pfork and indie rock both did a lot of, uh, growing in the 00s and the list is evidence of how it played out.
if everyone has more choices, we start to miss out on "moment" records (even admittedly nichey moment records) like Kid A or Yankee Hotel Foxtrot or Blueprint.
Whether those are good records or bad records is besides the point
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
OTM, and why I suggested Funeral may have been picked for #1.
― sofatruck, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
The Strokes = rather basic strumming retro rock-pop joke band with whiney vocals hyped by the NME aimed at gormless simpleton sheeplike students
― djmartian, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
i don't remember singing for the strokes, djmartian
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know that that's true, Whiney. I'm not surprised not to see Idiot, SOAD, MCR or 50 because they seem so antithetically opposed to the PFork aesthetic. This is less true of The Knife and Kid A. And the music from the early part of the 90s has had more time to settle into a durable canon, while the last few years are still up for grabs. Time hasn't yet separated the durable goods from the momentary distractions. Suspect that in 10 years time, a revised P-Fork "Best of the 00s" would seem more uniform.
Not discounting your basic observation, which may be true. It might also be that the early 00s were the peak of confluence between mainstream and indie tastes. Dunno...
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, and that was important. But from that, nobody would claim that "Al Gore was the key technological innovator of our times" or something similarly silly. Claiming that "took the initiative in creating the internet" (i.e. what he literally said) is also a pretty ludicrous stretch (although I guess it's forgivable in the context of building yourself to make a run at the White House).
Radiohead made an album that was an original and daring step for a rock band to take, and there are some good ideas there, but nothing so inventive to make me say "album of the decade, cultural touchstone of our times, etc." It's all about the superlatives.
This leads into your second point ... I might prefer Autechre to "Idioteque", but that's not the point. If even some of the band's biggest defenders (I'm not pointing the finger at you here, so let's use Mark R's blurb as the scapegoat for argument's sake) won't claim that certain derivative elements of "Kid A" aren't among the best of their kind ever recorded, then what exactly makes it the best album of the 00's? It becomes that only once it is assigned a certain cultural significance long after the fact (thanks, in part, to things like this list).
Now I'm treading on some of the points that Nick has been making, but I pretty much agree with everything he's said here.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
If even some of the band's biggest defenders (I'm not pointing the finger at you here, so let's use Mark R's blurb as the scapegoat for argument's sake) won't claim that certain derivative elements of "Kid A" aren't among the best of their kind ever recorded, then what exactly makes it the best album of the 00's?
Being well-liked. And I think that many of the band's defenders WILL claim that certain elements of Kid A are among the best of their kind ever recorded. I certainly will, and I'm more a fence-sitter than a fan. Nothing makes anything the "best album of the 00s", but I'm not at all surprised that lots of folks rank it high among their favorite albums of the decade.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork ca. 2000-2004 seemed to be a cerebral, indie-centric, avant-friendly version of the emerging '00s canon. And post-Arcade Fire pfork started trying to write their OWN canon, positioning themselves as leaders, not followers.
[...] Everything after 2004 suffers from the "my ears are as good as anyones" spirit the internet fostered
waht? that isn't an internet spirit, it's the fundamental critical spirit. who's lead shouldd pdork be following?
it's depressing if the knife elpee really is one of the best 100 records of the decade. i haven't heard enough to say, but the knife are pretty mediocre.
― history mayne, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
why are there posts about al gore in this thread
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney OTM. We had a lot of internal discussion in the office about why the consensus records happened earlier. You said "And post-Arcade Fire pfork started trying to write their OWN canon, positioning themselves as leaders, not followers." but I think more than that, around the time of Funeral *everyone* started writing their own canon, this was when the blogosphere mk. II started taking off, and I bet for a lot of the indie-centric ones it was in reaction to the response to things like Funeral-as-consensus.
I do think Funeral was a tipping point for the lack of consensus, but I also think it works both ways-- that record proved to a lot of artists that they could stay on indies, and so they did. And it's a lot harder for VW or Spoon or whomever to gain the sort of consensus today enjoyed by Stripes/Strokes a few years earlier (esp. since in the early 00s the majors were still pretty darn adept at kingmaking). Those bands "doomed" themselves to top out around "guest spot on 'SNL'" but also probably guaranteed they'd have a shot at long careers. (And with so many people with the indie, post-punk sensibilities you all are describing in creative power positions in the U.S., bands like that now can get guest spots on SNL, licensing, soundtrack work, etc.; indie rock and P4k def grew up in the 00s, Whiney is right there, but like [nabisco]'s essay pointed out "indie rock" is only part of that story.)
Not sure P4k would dismiss the Strokes these days, but I assume there was a lot more internal squabbling over VW than there was over the Strokes in 01 or so.
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
of course the internal squabbling was only because (full disclosure) an ex-pitchfork video editor is a cousin of one of the vampire weekend members!
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
That's all valid, and almost certainly true, but it attaches all importance to the people evaluating the moment and their means of evaluation, and none to the moment itself.
It may also be that big, unifying, moment-creating records have simply been thinner on the ground in the last few years than they were in the early 00s -- in the indieverse, anyway. Stankonia, Discovery, Kid A, Funeral & YHF vs. Silent Shout, MPP and Fleet Foxes. Of course, you can't separate art from the perception of art, but I don't think that perception is the whole game, either.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
last one re: scott and whiney
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:21 (fifteen years ago)
The idea that critical perception is what makes art relevant is a form of myopia that critics are particularly prone to.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
totally
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
not really sure how to do a list any other way.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
not one that encompasses an entire decade at any rate
I'm pretty sure PFM follows P&J, RS, the defunct Stylus, and almost every publication I can think of in ranking albums according to how many mentions they get on ballots (with some subtle massaging), so I'm not sure what all the fuss here is. Of course Kid A topped the list. I'm sure it would top Stylus' list if we were still around.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
Art is not art until it is written about furiously.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:24 (fifteen years ago)
this thread is ABOUT critical perception, though, contenderizer. i don't think anyone is saying Arcade Fire is an "important" band with a straight face.
Besides, there's not gonna BE those records, contenderizer, if the system is not set up to support them
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:24 (fifteen years ago)
Soto, no one's been talking about that for like 100 posts
http://20.media.tumblr.com/ickM8xfwBniuo5fzUivXPagbo1_500.jpg
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, in a veiled way we still are ("consensus," "importance," and so on).
More interested in whether the music is "important" than u like it. TOo many people.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
it's depressing if the knife elpee really is one of the best 100 records of the decade. i haven't heard enough to say, but the knife are pretty mediocre
not as depressing as this bs
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
Besides, there's not gonna BE those records, contenderizer, if the system is not set up to support them― Whiney G. Weingarten
― Whiney G. Weingarten
I see yr point, and I agree, but I don't know that it's necessarily the best explanation for the what we see going on in the list. I think the crux may have more to do with the records released in the last few years than with the mechanisms that greet and process them. After all, MPP and Person Pitch were received much like the event records of old (by which I mean the event records of more than a few years ago). And Vampire Weekend and The Strokes produced similar records to similar effect, bookending the decade. It seems looking back that the late 90s and early 00s were a particularly fruitful time in terms of commercially successful, boundary-breaking crossover between electronic, indie, and mainstream rock tastes, and that this has been somewhat (slightly) less true of the last 4 or 5 years.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
blueski OTM about Silent Shout. I'll take that over Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (or American Idiot) any day of the week.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
good thing we'll have the inevitable ilx list to set everyone straight...
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
u only like the knife b/c it's the same vox organ from "girls just wanna have fun"
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:41 (fifteen years ago)
After all, MPP and Person Pitch were received much like the event records of old
If you think Spin and Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly and older critics were pissing their pants over Person Pitch like they were for Kid A, thenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWhInhE6emE
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
hotly anticipating the ILX list xposts
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
Re Whiney:
Can't watch that at work, but again, there was a time in the early 00s when a whole bunch of streams were intermixed, and this doesn't boil down so easily to the cart/horse relationship of internet tastemakers to trends in pop music. I'm starting (ha) to sound like a broken record, but I think that the likes of Kid A, Discovery, Illinois, YHF, Elephant, Stankonia, Soft Bulletin, Blueprint (etc.) were intrinsically better able to speak to and unify wide swaths of the indie music buying/listening/blogging public than most of what's been released in the last few years -- and also to cross boundaries between indie folx and other audiences. I think this would be true whether not the game had changed (and I'm not convinced about the extent to which it has).
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
y'all duckin J0rdan's q
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Friday, 2 October 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
― Mr. Que, Friday, October 2, 2009 2:36 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not too crazy about the lists, but [nabisco]'s "Decade in Indie" essay is fabulous.
― o. nate, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
waiting for the "Decade in Lists" essay
― tylerw, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
I'm starting (ha) to sound like a broken record, but I think that the likes of Kid A, Discovery, Illinois, YHF, Elephant, Stankonia, Soft Bulletin, Blueprint (etc.) were intrinsically better able to speak to and unify wide swaths of the indie music buying/listening/blogging public than most of what's been released in the last few years
Maybe because seven out of eight of those records had major label budgets and marketing behind it, thus reaching hundreds of thousands of more people and selling hundreds and thousands of more records than nichey stuff like Panda Bear and The Knife that the internet is trying elevating to canon.
It's different playing fields, dogg
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
It's like comparing Magnolia/American Beauty/Boogie Nights to The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
more like oh limp dicks
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
who wants to talk about garden state and the shins?
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
The early 00s stuff on the Pfork list is giant bands that felt like indie, the late 00s stuff is indie bands that generation myspace tries to elevate to status of big bands.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
between 2000 and 2009, the music industry changed, music criticism changed and indie rock changed. the list reflects that in spades. it's not that records suck now
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
damn, maybe i should have pitched scott an essay.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
hotly anticipating boycotting the ILX lists tbh
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:04 (fifteen years ago)
the late 00s stuff is indie bands that generation myspace tries to elevate to status of big bands.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, October 2, 2009 11:02 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
some of these bands do get elevated to the status of "big bands" tho - this year's kind of the perfect example w grizzly bear, AC, decemberists, andrew bird etc - i mean the early decade "giant bands" that felt "indie"? wilco was giant in 01? modest mouse?
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
o. nate OTM about nabisco's indie piece.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
Wilco was giant in the scene and Modest Mouse went top 40; by contrast, I still have not even heard Grizzly Bear or Animal Collective (admittedly by choice, but when Wilco and MM were being talked about I would still stumble across them inadvertently).
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
Scott said it upthread – the record companies still called (most of) the shots in the early noughties.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
indie rock "won" but at what cost
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
grizzly bear & animal collective both debuted in the top 10 this year
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
At the cost of ILM threads.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think jay-z showed up at any modest mouse shows either!
lol @ u playing into the blogga theory of "famous black person shows up somewhere" = validation
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
LOOKS LIKE WE MAAADE IT
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
This doesn't change the fact that my music listening habits haven't changed dramatically and the spaces I'm in where I'm not directly controlling the music aren't playing Animal Collective and Grizzly Bear, whereas 9 years ago they were playing Wilco and Modest Mouse.
The label analysis rings very true to me because it matches my experience with this music.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
xp: man, if I'd been more famous I totally could have made GusGus's career
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
o. nate OTM about nabisco's indie piece
Lots of good stuff in it, but I esp. like this part:
I'll spare you a long, old-mannish digression about the things I had to do, pre-Internet, to engage with the music I wanted to hear; it was a constant and hilariously archaic scramble. But these days, these things float past you everywhere, and I'm hard-pressed to think of many acts I'd recommend that you couldn't very casually, within two minutes of web-searching, check out right on your computer. More and more, we define ourselves-- or pride ourselves, or at least "express" ourselves-- via our skills in picking interesting things out of that cloud of options. We probably shouldn't be surprised that somewhere in this process, "indie" completed its trip from being the province of freaks and geeks to something with cachet-- something that appeals to people's sense of themselves as discerning.
― o. nate, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
eh idk if there's a cost? mostly i think in general people always want to feel 'in the know' or more discerning & cooler than the next guy and the internet has made that much easier across tons of spectrums & i think that's a large part of why a band like grizzly bear has been catapulted up the way they have. it certainly isn't from people reading one-pages in rolling stone.
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, October 2, 2009 11:15 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
yes i was being totally serious when i posted about jay-z's tastes in rock as a metric for impact
although you're an idiot if you think there wouldn't have been the same blog fervor if eminem or britney spears or hillary clinton randomly showed up at a brooklyn pool
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
Many xposts-- so kshighway was permabanned? I must've missed that.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
he was permabanned when he suggested Amnesiac was better than Kid A
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
Shit, Whiney, I'm not saying that "records suck now". But nor am I reducing it entirely to the desire of generation myspace (or whatever) to author their own narrative. I'm just saying that we should maybe pay equal attention to other factors, such as the kinds of records that major labels are/were pushing, their relative clout, and even the kinds of records that people are/were making. Maybe. At least consider that the seeming waywardness of indie taste might be a product things that exist outside the internet.
Maybe I'm misconstruing yr point somehow. Based on yr post upthread about Green Day, SOAD and "my ears are as good as anyone's", I gathered you were saying that potentially scene unifying records DO exist, and that indie ppls just aren't responding properly, due to an internet-fostered insularity that you find fault with. Whereas I think the situation has at least as much to do with the nature of the music being made/released/promoted, and the fact that indie culture is currently responding more to the breakthroughs of the last decade-plus (both commercial and artistic) than making new ones.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
On the plus side, I was pleasantly surprised that B.O.B. won the other poll.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
We probably shouldn't be surprised that somewhere in this process, "indie" completed its trip from being the province of freaks and geeks to something with cachet-- something that appeals to people's sense of themselves as discerning.-- nabisco (as quoted a few posts back by o. nate)
-- nabisco (as quoted a few posts back by o. nate)
Oddly enough, this is one of the few things in nabisco's indie write-up that bugged me. Indie has always been something that appeals to people's sense of themselves as discerning. This was true long before it became "independent rock" in the mid 80s. It was true of the freaking Velvet Underground. Main difference is that the rules that govern indie discernment have become universal and are no longer the exclusive province of a self-styled hipster elite.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
i think whiney is right about green day/system of a down/fall out boy/my chem/paramore - it was always weird to me that these albums (green day aside) never got reviewed or even looked at critically (aside from some track reviews maybe) the way that pfork took to albums by timberlake and beyonce and even the last rihanna album. i guess there was nothing to gain for them by stumping for these albums? and there certainly were writers who would've stumped for some paramore & fall out boy albums. iirc amy phillips had 'infinity on high' & the second paramore joint high on her list as well as dave maher. the pfork trap rap contingent was allowed to give vanity reviews to, like, beanie sigel (and our very own deej is still permitted to run favorable album reviews of oj da juiceman) but alternative rock was never really afforded that same, ahem, opportunity.
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
I suppose you can say that country and teen-pop too.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
where is the poll?
― Bee OK, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
PFm doesn't give time to uber-selling alt-rock or country or teenpop, but does to hip hop and sophistipop, because of the whole discerning reader thing outlined above.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
Whether that's right or wrong is up to you.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
contenderizer, i think any great record COULD be that great unifying indie record of the late 00s. There's certianly enough great ones.
But it's like everything is so nichefied now that it's really hard for anything to reach critical mass. American Idiot doesn't get a fair shake from blogsnobs, but might have had a chance in 1999 when they only had Spin/120 Minutes to go by. Animal Collective doesn't have a big label pushing them to yuppos the same way Flaming Lips and Radiohead did. The Carter III is subject to so much skepticism from the getgo. Vampire Weekend can't catch a break because they are here by the accelerated hype cycle, not talent, and everyone fucking knows it and doesn't want to deal with it--but maybe if the radio played them 10 times a day people might come over and see it as a guilty pop treat.
Whoever made the point about not hearing this music accidentally was OTM. I bet even the snobbiest snob would come around to some of this shit if they were subject to it ALL THE FUCKING TIME like they were in the 90s. I mean we don't have a Nirvana because hearing a band on MTV/radio/magazine/outlets doesn't mean shit to a generation used to learning about HEALTH from a two-minute YouTube video they watch once.
This plays out on a grander scale too. We'll never have another Thriller either. The monoculture is dead, even in indie. It's just a bunch of people pretending they call the shots when no one really does.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
Why deosn't Axl want to monocultre?
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
i, for one, miss our old insect overlords
― da croupier, Friday, 2 October 2009 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
Jeez, J0rdan, but the divide between indie-approved rock and "loathesome" mainstream mallpunk/metal has been VAST and unbridgeable ever since fucking grunge collapsed. Fall Out Boy, MCR and SOAD were never gonna be embraced by the crowd that found common ground on, like, Sufjan Stevens, Daft Punk, Jay-Z, and Animal Collective. Never never never. Closest you get is the buzz around retro weed/black metal and noise-addled lofi punk. If High On Fire and No Age were putting out career-best, pop-friendly records on major labels, I imagine that the P-Fork indie universe would be just as excited about them as they were about The White Stripes and Queens of the Stone Age 8 years ago. But no one's doing that. The bands that could aren't interested, and the majors don't seem to care.
Plus, to Whiney:
Agree entirely with that last post. Only thing I'd cut is the bitterness that expresses itself in "people pretending to call the shots when no one really does" (bitter-seeming to the extent that it echoes your earlier statements about "generation myspace", etc). I don't see the indie audience's failure to rally around American Idiot as a problem, nor their interest in canonizing bands that have limited appeal. I mean, I attached a lot of importance to the Butthole Surfers and The Minutemen in my day...
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:53 (fifteen years ago)
I think reading bitterness into verbiage that was chosen to denote rhetorical emphasis.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
In talking about Whiney's bitterness, I'm mostly responding to this bit (and subsequent stuff that echoes its spirit):
Everything after 2004 suffers from the "my ears are as good as anyones" spirit the internet fostered, and is basically a list of records that staffers would like to THINK are important but maybe secretly know they're not. This is why they can't FULLY put their weight behind obvious piffle like The Knife and why the list misses shit like American Idiot and System Of A Down and My Chemical Romance and 50 Cent and Bob Dylan.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:58 (fifteen years ago)
Fall Out Boy, MCR and SOAD were never gonna be embraced by the crowd that found common ground on, like, Sufjan Stevens, Daft Punk, Jay-Z, and Animal Collective. Never never never
i'm not asking or expecting the pitchfork readership to embrace any of the bands i mentioned. but, i think that pitchfork has enough influence and enough talented writers to write critically & interestingly & all of that about good albums (which, as i pointed out, some of their writers think they are) that are 'alt-rock' or what have you. their readership isn't embracing beyonce or timberlake or nelly furtado or juelz santana or z-ro (the list goes on) either, so i don't really think that that is a good argument.
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
my 2 cents
-When Arcade Fire comes in #2 it either means this decade of music really sucked or pitchfork's version of this decade of music really sucked. However they got one thing right in the blab underneath 'Funeral': "it might just be a crossover version of Neutral Milk Hotel's In the Aeroplane Over the Sea." I absolutely hated Neutral Milk Hotel's 'In the Aeroplane Over the Sea' so it only makes sense that I would at least somewhat hate Arcade Fire. If you ask me why I hate those albums I will tell you that the vocals are particularly annoying to me and the driving melodies make me want to drive off a cliff. Yeah it's aesthetically unpleasing and that's the farthest I'll go to describe Arcade Fire before totally pissing somebody off. But I will go ahead and throw Arcade Fire in the same group as Animal Collective, Panda Bear, and half the Grizzly Bear stuff. No I won't try to stereotype this group other than grouping them together.
-To be fair to pitchfork 'Kid A' is a really good album. If you hate that than I'll let you take a jab at me. It's not the best album of the decade (but probably the best album of pitchfork's top 50 after Amnesiac (imho)).
I've seen pitchfork writer's top 25 lists and I honestly don't think I could rep for any of them.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
*writers'
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
and i think new alt rock like i mentioned is in a different category than stuff like country & teen pop. if some of the older pitchfork readership grew up with nine inch nails and the smashing pumpkins (bands that pitchfork cover in their news sections obsessively) then why wouldn't they possibly open their ears to 'welcome to the black parade' or 'system of a down'
xxp pretending like cpt lorax didn't just post
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
i totally understand and share NMH hate but cool with Arcade Fire go figure
― modescalator (blueski), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
whoops @ the quotes around system of a down
-When Arcade Fire comes in #2 it either means this decade of music really sucked or pitchfork's version of this decade of music really sucked.
^^^OTM
― the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
i seem to remember SOAD getting lots of indie-kudos when Toxicity came out. If not on Pitchfork then somewhere, because all my B+S, Wilco, Flaming Lips buds loved it.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I admit I am kind of surprised that SOAD didn't do well on this list, but then again I had no idea that Pitchfork wanted to have all The Knife's creepy babies so my idea of what they are into from a critical consensus perspective is just off.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
CHOAD.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
their readership isn't embracing beyonce or timberlake or nelly furtado or juelz santana or z-ro (the list goes on) either, so i don't really think that that is a good argument-- J0rdan
-- J0rdan
Yeah, but it's clearly interesting for indie, at this point in its social development, to experiment with appreciating the contemporary analogs of the "fake, bullshit, manufactured, mainstream pop" that it spent so much of its time and energy rejecting in the 80s and 90s. Liking that kind of music (or at least trying to) is, in other words, part of current indie identity. Mallpunk, emo and post-grunge mainstream metal are still off-limits. That'll change at some point in the future when nu-metal undergoes its inevitable rehabilitation, but for now, the wall stands. The fondness for Toxicity was a blip, and one that indie seemed to run from as fast as it could.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:10 (fifteen years ago)
"Their readership isn't embracing beyonce or timberlake..."
But Timberlake was # 25 on Pitchforks top 50 of 2006!! Its totally OK to like him because Pitchfork said it was OK!!!
― Evan, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
Timberlake/Timbaland/mainstream pop/R&B were doing things more identifiably familiar to Pitchfork readers/indie types though, right? iirc, Toxicity was played up (as was Slipknot's Iowa) because they were (perceived to be) doing something intelligent onto which the indie audience could gain a foothold and justify their like.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
not that ignoring other areas is justified at all (look at Tim F's Taylor Swift talk), but it's not quite as obvious as Timbaland's Missy production
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
I think the cover art for Mezmerize and Hypnotize retroactively and instantaneously killed any fondness indie might have had in Toxicity. Or maybe that was just me.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
I've seen pitchfork writers' top 25 lists and I honestly don't think I could rep for any of them.
wait, really? I can't find mine: can you remind me where I put Rufus Wainwright?
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
You put Poses at #5, and that guy is lying.
― scottpl, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
^^^^OTM
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
I like Rufus Wainwright's Poses album.But I could never rep for a list with let's say 7 things that are either extremely meh or bad. That basically means I can't rep for any list besides my own... the top 25 lists are largely pointless.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
I think it means 'lots of people at pitchfork liked the album' but that's just me
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZZUMjoxfZA
― abanana, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
haha what a spoiler, I wanted to be double-checked by Lorax
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:25 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think that what Nabisco wrote is that different from what you're saying here. Yes, the indie-hipster of yesteryear and the indie-hipster of today are both exercising "discernment" - the difference is the degree of personal investment of time and energy that is required to seek out non-mainstream bands. What used to be a massively time-consuming passion can now be just a casual interest. The audience for this type of band has expanded exponentially, and the level of commitment and intensity has dropped (on average, not in every particular case). At the same time, the distinguishing subcultural markers become less meaningful. What was once the province of "freaks and geeks" is now mainstream.
Even back in the day, people always said that it was all about the music, but I think a big part of the fun for a lot of people was the sense of being plugged into a secret underground society, with its own mores, markers, and shibboleths. Thus the resentment whenever a band got too popular or "sold out", in the parlance of the times. The fact that it took a while to build a following, even among the most tuned-in members of the subculture, was a necessary constraint. Now that constraint is gone, and bands routinely become internet sensations practically overnight - available to anyone anywhere at the click of a mouse. It's hard to figure out what "selling out" means anymore. And so the bogeyman which was used to police the borders of the subculture is gone, and the subculture feels like it's dissolving. Everything is just pop now. Perhaps this is the coded message in Pitchfork's inscrutable embrace of Timberlake et al.
― o. nate, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:34 (fifteen years ago)
And other things I said years ago. FUGUYZ.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:44 (fifteen years ago)
lol you have a blog
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:45 (fifteen years ago)
xpost: fine, but like a hundred billion other "indie" threads to thread
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
Everything is just pop now. Perhaps this is the coded message in Pitchfork's inscrutable embrace of Timberlake et al.
Yes, but clearly this catholic embrace doesn't go so far as to include Hilary Duff and Mariah Carey, right?
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
one thing that's probably relevant about Radiohead, incidentally -- and maybe Kid A in particular, since its release felt like a talked-about event for a lot of people -- is that they have a fairly unique ability to elicit respect even from people who aren't thoroughly sold on them, not even in terms of their importance or credibility but for the music itself. for me, for instance, they're a band I don't totally connect with -- they don't naturally appeal to me and never really did -- and yet they do what they do well enough that I tend to like it pretty well anyway. I think this is a whole other aspect of consensus that's totally apart from considerations about genre or audience or timing or importance. and sort of an important and telling one, really; there's something to be said about making really popular and talked-about records where, honestly, very few people in a mass of very-critical folks are going to begrudge you the claim that you're skilled and relatively inventive and make solid albums, where you're rarely going to hear much grumbling that you're putting something mediocre or over-hyped over on anyone. (someone will now post exactly those claims -- fine.)
xpost - re: the thing about discernment, that is pretty much precisely what I meant -- I think the posture of "discernment" is a way more common experience for way more people these days, and I think underground music or music-geekery or "indie" or whatever have all coded as, like, "discerning" options, for a long time. that's now new, no; what's new is maybe that now-more-than-ever wider groups of people are inclined to take that "discerning" posture up
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:51 (fifteen years ago)
nabisco, link me to your essay please
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:51 (fifteen years ago)
I thought you already edited it
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
no I haven't
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:55 (fifteen years ago)
what's new is maybe that now-more-than-ever wider groups of people are inclined to take that "discerning" posture up― nabisco
― nabisco
That part I agree with wholeheartedly. Only thing I'd add is that it's been going on for quite some time, and that the mainstreaming of late 80s indie rock values/aesthetics is only part of it. Step before that is probably MTV...
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
you know I would have been really happy if Jim Guthrie - 'Now More Than Ever' made the the top 20.. or the top 200
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:57 (fifteen years ago)
Nabisco, you're right of course re; recognition of radiohead's skill; what saddens me is that people don't have 50 records they love more than this one they respect.
― Sickamous (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:57 (fifteen years ago)
i'm sure plenty of people who voted for it did!
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah even 'Now More Than Ever' has a good bit of dud tracks but I love it. Deserves top 20 potential.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:02 (fifteen years ago)
you are high, y/n
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
no I fit in this conversation. I don't respect 'Now More Than Ever'. I only halfway love it.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:09 (fifteen years ago)
pitchfork did pick respected albums over loved albums :p
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:10 (fifteen years ago)
I think that will tend to happen whenever you compile a bunch of lists from different people. We love individually and respect socially.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:15 (fifteen years ago)
'pitchfork' didn't pick anything, a bunch of people made lists and these were the albums they had in common.
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
how many people were in this bunch of people?
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
hey guys, it is what it is
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
you know?
exactly
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
how many people were in the bunch that made lists: just the writers for pitchfork or the fans of pitchfork also?
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
it is what it is, you know?
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
30 million, lorax
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
lorax - 3428450.43
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
fans entered a contest to submit their best of lists
and Al Gore picked the winners
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
from a hat and get this--the hat was once worn by a member of The Animal Collective
wait Al Gore used his own hat?
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
alright i'm coming out of the closet here. my pitchfork fan ballot had kid a #1. i urge others to own up as well.
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
to kid a's opposers, i remind you that my ancestors died in the holocaust and that i have already suffered enough
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
to be honest I shouldn't have even used the word "respect," because that's not exactly what I'm trying to describe. there are plenty of albums I don't really love where, if they had come in #1, I'd have (socially) respected that they're loved by or important to other people, or I didn't have any complaints with them, and I wouldn't have been bothered. Kid A is toward the top of a different pile where I don't deep-down love it but I honestly think it's really, really good. this is not "respect" in the bad or dutiful sense the word's getting knocked around here, it's genuine, impressed, admiring respect, a full openness to the possibly that this is the best thing made this decade, and just happens to be a "best thing" that wasn't quite precisely for me.
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
tbh I still just don't understand how kid a could win, despite the fact that there are other albums that I personally like more than kid a
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
we can say that the pitchfork decade lists are basically nothing more than picks from fans of pitchfork no wonder it turned out the way it didokay am I just stating the obvious?go back to a different conversation
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
abandon music
― waldo geraldo faldo (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
a real question: is there a practical utility to a list like this other than serving as a primer/listener's guide for people who are relatively new to indie music?
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
kid a didn't win, it was in a tie with funeral, and then Radiohead's lawyers appealed to the Supreme Court, and now we're stuck with this 5-4 decision the rest of our lives. we'll make it, i think, but let's all remember that a voice (or shall i say a series of voices) from Canada has been silenced.
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
guys i think we're finally hitting bottom
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
long road to recovery for all of us
fuck I knew Sam Alito would be a disappointment to the left.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
who knew Alito was a fan of Idioteque
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
a brilliant performance here from captain lorax, don't want it get lost in this 4,000 post thread
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
Aside from the relatively new listener, it can also point the jaded listener towards things they might have previously glossed over or forgotten about.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
alito felt like the dystopia depicted by kid a better reflected his childhood as an italian-american in jersey
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
tbh I still just don't understand how kid a could win, despite the fact that there are other albums that I personally like more than kid a― iatee, Friday, October 2, 2009 3:27 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― iatee, Friday, October 2, 2009 3:27 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
LOOOOOOOOOOOOL
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:32 (fifteen years ago)
still think Kennedy's blistering dissent (especially that awesome footnoted section on Wake Up) is one for the textbooks
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:32 (fifteen years ago)
before she retired Sandra Day O'Connor confided to her clerks that Chutes Too Narrow was "one for the ages."
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
Everything is just pop now. Perhaps this is the coded message in Pitchfork's inscrutable embrace of Timberlake et al.___________________________________________Yes, but clearly this catholic embrace doesn't go so far as to include Hilary Duff and Mariah Carey, right?
RIGHT.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
Can I just take this time out to thank the mods for leaving my will2K autoplay embed in this shit the entire time.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
it was well-played!
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
IT'S HERE AND I LIIIIIKE IIIIIT
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
wait autoplay? i don't hear anything
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
lucky you - u have to open up the whole thread
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
this seems like a reasonably accurate way of putting it, maybe apart from the word "new." by ILX standards, "people who are relatively new to indie music" includes most everyone on Earth, a huge proportion of the people who've clicked over to look at this list, a good proportion of people who read Pitchfork generally. there are also plenty of people who aren't "new" to indie music but don't follow it in any in-depth, daily, voracious way -- i.e., normal music fans. or college kids who've been listening to indie since they were 15 but don't know everything in the world about '02. or normal music fans who just like to spend their time loving cream-of-crop stuff but aren't big on the music-geek work of sorting through everything finding gems. or really anyone apart from (like Scott said) the very, very small number of music obsessives who already know about pretty much any record that could plausibly have wound up on this list. hell, you can even be really obsessive about music and not have heard all of this stuff! (which is part of what Dan said.)
so I take it as a sort of given that yeah, the primary obvious ostensible purpose of any music site/mag/whatever doing any list like this is to offer an all-in-one wrap-up of what it thinks is the cream of the crop -- it's a roundup like any other, right? it comes along with a bunch of stuff for music geeks to discuss and argue about and all, that, which is clearly something people like about lists, so there's that. but surely the fundamental purpose of anything like this is ... well, it's like if someone wanted to know what music you liked, so you made them a nice mixtape, instead of pointing them at your massive record collection and saying "over there."
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
Which is to say,http://www.1stedition.net/Images/frontcovers/petunia.jpg
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
it's like you have the greatest music collection in the world over there that you're pointing to and you decide instead to blow their mind with the arcade fire and radiohead and wilco on the mix cd.
― omar little, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
feel sorry for any indie newbie misled into thinking the arcade fire debut is the #2 album of the decade. that's enough to turn you off the music right there
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
but i guess i feel sorry for any indie newbie period
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
it's enough to make you listen to rap
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
was the deltron 3030 album even on that list? just curious
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
it was number 30
― baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
sorry everybody
i'd like to see a rap lp depicting a dystopian future in which everyone is still talking about the same albums as we are now
― omar little, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
haha I was about to address some of those things but like c'mon, you people have seen lists before
― nabisco, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
I was so proud of my rap mix cd I gave my friend the other day. But he just wanted to hear the M.I.A. stuff I gave him.
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
It was a little . . . dour?
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork 2000-2004 list Top 100
88. Viktor Vaughn - Vaudeville Villain82. King Geedorah - Take Me to Your Leader 74. Aesop Rock - Labor Days 55. Cannibal Ox - The Cold Vein13. Madvillain - Madvillainy
Pitchfork 2000-2009 list Top 10025. Madvillain - Madvillainy
Backpack rap R.I.P. :(
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
lol at people looking at this list and going "but it's not fair, those aren't *really* the best albums of the decade"
The very notion of a list like this being some sort of objective index of anything is insane, it's an average of a set of writers who, hello, are themselves framing what they write about as "pitchfork-worthy" from the get-go, and "best" doesn't mean anything other than "most popular among these critics". Popularity and quality are not one-to-one in their correspondence.
I don't look at that list and not see my favorite albums of the decade there, and launch into some cranky player-hater rant that Current 93's "Black Ships Ate the Sky" wuz robbed, Sunn0))) "Black One" wuz robbed, Kurt Weisman's "Spiritual Sci-Fi" wuz robbed, Autechre's "Quaristice" wuz robbed, blah blah blah. It's just not surprising that there's something average and safe and indie-ish about a list that is *literally* an average of a bunch of people who think of themselves as mostly writing for a certain demographic of indie hipsterdom when they write for Pitchfork.
― Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
i'm gonna do something productive and listen to that Ricardo Villalobos album I never heard until now.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
whiney u forgot cannibal ox. or was that top 200 only?
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
lol yeah you do drew because you just listed current 93 et al
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
xpost - yeh, 150 or something
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah it was like 150.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
i think it should just be said that scottpl has been a really nice and smart and reasonable guy, and brought a tremendous amount of realness to this discussion.
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
scott's always been a super guy, it should go w/o sayin
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
that current 93 album really is great
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
i think it should just be said that scottpl CaptainLorax has been a really nice and smart and reasonable guy, and brought a tremendous amount of realness to this discussion.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
― autogoon delight (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
am I the only person who is v. interested in lorax's rap mix
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
no
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
that current 93 album and aleph too are both way better than funeral
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
nothing is better than Funeral
― Mr. Que, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
yes capn please post that
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that villalobos thing is one of a couple of albums I am gonna seek out because of the list. The other: that Life Without Buildings thing nabs wrote about. Sounds really neat.
In general, the 200-101 section made much more interesting reading for me.
Also, I thought it was interesting how many blurbs took the "this album is unrepeatable and everyone including the band knows it" tack.
Also Aleph will prob be in my personal top 10 o' decade xpost
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, October 2, 2009 4:56 PM (1 minute ago)
whatever, i wrote that because although a lot of people including myself have been saying snarky things about this list, i personally really appreciate the hell out of it. and since dude's been keeping tracks of the internet's reaction to it, well i just thought it should be said y'know.
― samosa gibreel, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
i dont think he was disagreeing w/ you
― wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
― kamerad, Friday, October 2, 2009 4:53 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
naw if I was going to get sour-grapesy and player-haterish I'd be boo-hooing that "A Chance to Cut is A Chance to Cure" or "The Civil War" wuz robbed. Which I'm not, mind you . . . *quietly accepts irrelevance*
― Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
N.P.S. for preznit 2012. (Hey, why not?)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, i was agreeing with you, samosa.
not everything i say has quotey fingers
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Thanks Ned. My platform ( mandatory Best Album of the Decade award to Bohren & Der Club of Gore's "Black Earth" ) will unite a fearful, internally divided nation, cloaking them all in a damp, rotten-smelling blanket of droney melancholic jazz-doom.
― Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Black Ships Ate The Sky would be in my personal toplist for sure, but i wouldn't dream of attempting to put my thoughts in order for something like that without another year or more of distance from the decade.
it's hard to rate albums that have held up over 5+ years, and albums that are brand new and exciting but you have no idea if they'll hold up, both in the same list.
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
political futures aside, matmos >>>>>>>>>>>>> arcade fire
― kamerad, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
like Ys seemed like the greatest thing during the fall of 06 or whenever it was that it came out but i don't think i've played it a single time since then
― extremely demanding on the hardware (ciderpress), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
npsotm
wish the writers' lists were posted. Generally, with lists like this, I'm happy that a few albums I really like made it, as opposed to wondering why so few of my favorite albums seem anywhere close to making lists like this. Like, I'm almost proud that Vision Creation Newsun is considered one of the best albums of the decade, even if the general flavor of the list isn't mine. Fight from the inside!
― Dominique, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
there are plenty of albums I don't really love where, if they had come in #1, I'd have (socially) respected that they're loved by or important to other people, or I didn't have any complaints with them, and I wouldn't have been bothered. Kid A is toward the top of a different pile where I don't deep-down love it but I honestly think it's really, really good. this is not "respect" in the bad or dutiful sense the word's getting knocked around here, it's genuine, impressed, admiring respect...
I may not have communicated it clearly, but that's what I mean in using the word. In mentioning "social", I wasn't trying to describe something coldly dispassionate -- just something not entirely defined by inexplicable personal fondness. Dunno that it matters, really.
Also, people carping on the boring, played-out Pitchfork predictability of the top 10 are missing the point. If it's supposed to function (at least in part)as list of interesting things that curious site visitors s might wanna check out, it helps to have a brace of canonized PFork favorites at the top. That's the hook for fans who might not be so familiar with the stuff filling out the bottom 100. It signals that this will be "your [their] kind of list".
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
Doesn't P2K normally post the individual writer lists a day or two after the main list is posted?
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
fucking ton of typos up there
agree that individual lists would be nice
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
did west coast make the list?
― Lovelace, Friday, 2 October 2009 22:07 (fifteen years ago)
no, they voted for kid a instead
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 2 October 2009 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
well I'll try to remember some of the hip-hop mix (not in order.. the only same artists back2back were Blackalicious and Flynn Adam.. I regretted the Flynn Adam being back to back because they are too similar.. the 3 tracks with Pigeon John are very different)
Life Without Buildings - The Leanover (not rap - but was the first track - found thanks to NickB on ilx)Souls of Mischief - 93 'til InfinitySaul Williams - Black StacyBlackalicious - Alphabet Aerobics -into-> Chemical CalisthenicsThe Fugees - Nappy HeadsPigeon John - CheerleadersPigoeon John & Freedom of Soul - Not this RecordPigeon John & Kiz Charizmatic - Wow! (out there)Flynn Adam - Such a TimeFlynn Adam - Just Don't Get ItBlackstar - DefinitionTalib Kweli - The BlastJurassic 5 - Concrete StreetsKyteman - Une Seule Fois (feat. Reazun)Kyteman - She Blew Like Trumpets (the only song I regret putting on the mix)The Black Eyed Peas - Rap SongN.O.R.E ft. Tego Calderon & Nina Sky - Oye Mi CantoPharcyde - Passing Me By (edited because it's so long)Madvillain - Great Day (found thanks to ilx)
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
No, it didn't. This was one of the more surprising omissions, to me.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 22:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper882/stills/3bccf64bdd8ef-15-1.jpg
This one?
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
He looks so happy.
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 October 2009 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
no 'west coast' no credibility
― psychgawsple, Friday, 2 October 2009 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
no west coast no credibility
http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/22500/Elton-John-Rapper--22782.jpg
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 22:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_vJJWmzKz0Gw/Sil5kGK9_KI/AAAAAAAAAcQ/_0FMIPH0KfM/s400/Eminem+holding+hands+with+Elton+John+at+2001+Grammy+Awards+photo.jpg
lorax's rap mix would make a great poll imo
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
The early records are a little more universally indie and the later records are more Pitchfork(TM)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, October 2, 2009 10:47 AM (7 hours ago)
yeah, but this has more to do with this being the first decade where averag people know less new music than they did at the beginning of it, and pitchfork being pretty much the loudest voice and only profitable enterprise off these changes. i mean who's the competition leading an alternative decade trajectory? i'd like to see like, crazy ex-girlfriend on entertainment weekly's rundown but y'know. even they gave mpp an a-
― kiss out the jams, Friday, 2 October 2009 22:58 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe, but the only reason I posted it was for you and the other curious people's humble opinions. Don't leave me hanging. You can tie your review into pitchfork if you want
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 23:04 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think I've ever seen a humble opinion on this site
― iatee, Friday, 2 October 2009 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
I'll accept a bumble opinion
― I'm the best maaaayne, I did it (CaptainLorax), Friday, 2 October 2009 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
an hongro opinion even.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 October 2009 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
The majority of people posting here seem to hate these results, and I was expecting to hate them just as much, but as it turns out i love the majority of the albums in the top 100. And most of the stuff that placed high are among my favorite albums, so I have nothing to complain about.. And I have to say I'm shocked about that, since the "Top 50 Music Videos Of The 2000s" list was so completely horrible.. And I really didn't enjoy reading through albums 200-101 or songs 500-201 at all.
― billstevejim, Saturday, 3 October 2009 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
Hey, can we at least all agree here that 11-20 wipe the fucking floor with 1-10, a couple bright spots aside?
― snrub 'n' tug remix (The Reverend), Saturday, 3 October 2009 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
Anybody else notice or mention Separation Sunday placed higher than Boys and Girls in America?
― Evan, Saturday, 3 October 2009 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
I wasn't unhappy with the results; they were pretty much as I expected. Lot of great albums, esp in the 1-100 group, and a few other outliers. It turns out there were only a few of the albums out of the entire 200 that I hadn't heard (not that I listened carefully enough to have an informed opinion on some of the ones I DID hear). Makes me realize my exposure to new music has been clearly informed by their tastes, the things they rep for.
But I was kind of hoping that few albums at least would come from outside of pitchfork's usual world and claim there place with these. Not just albums that have been re-evaluated and found better ("Discovery" 6.4 initial riview, to #12 on mid-decade list, to #3, or Supreme Clientele, not even initially reviewed by P4K, to #19, to #11) but albums from generally outside their canon, ranging from anything like Coil/Current 93 to Taylor Swift to The-Dream. Those kind of second-order surprises are what I love most about lists like these. Since I assume there is some hive-mind decision-making at work, I guess they would have to have a collegial staff that hires new writers in different genres who can expand their brand. Do listening parties ever work as a means of consensus building? Would love to hear, eg, what P Sherburne might play for the other writers if he was making a case for the decade as he saw it...
― Dan S, Saturday, 3 October 2009 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
Six that should have been much higher: Marhall Mathers LP, Stories From The City Stories From the Sea, Up The Bracket, Hissing Fauna, Arular, Meadowlands
Six that should have been lower: Funeral, The Moon and Antarctica, Sigur Ros, The Avalanches, Fleet Foxes, Phoenix
Six inexplicably left off: Conor Oberst, The Glands, Fox Confessor Brings The Flood, The Hives record, Welcome Interstate Managers, Decoraction Day
― kornrulez6969, Saturday, 3 October 2009 06:35 (fifteen years ago)
Of course it did; it's a much better album.
― if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 07:21 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone here thinks Seven Swans is miles better than Illinois? I understand and respect Illinois as a more ambitious and perhaps a more achieved concept but Seven Swans is perhaps the best Christian-based album ever. Moreso when you realise the whole concept spirals around the judgement day and the inevitability of death. Reminds me of Nick Drake's pink moon, morbid condemnations disguised as lullabies.
― Moka, Saturday, 3 October 2009 07:27 (fifteen years ago)
Well perhaps not 'morbid condemnations' per se since they believe in the afterlife and for them there is peace in death and mundane terror but from an agnostic's point of view I think it's bonkers at times but admirably beautiful.
― Moka, Saturday, 3 October 2009 07:41 (fifteen years ago)
(ps: I am aware Nick Drake is dead. I wrote in present tense as I was sort of referring to their lyrics.)
― Moka, Saturday, 3 October 2009 07:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, Seven Swans is my favourite Sufjan album by a good margin.
― I thought I could make it work because you look a bit like a man (aldo), Saturday, 3 October 2009 07:54 (fifteen years ago)
So I'm intrigued by the Lala tie-in with the Pitchfork list. There are some great prices, but I'm wary of signing up for another online music service and this notion that Lala "Take(s) the music you already have and make(s) it playable anywhere on the web (via the Music Mover system)."
Anyone have noteworthy experiences with Lala? If I sign up, do I have to open my music collection to this "Music Mover" system?
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 10:17 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, kornrulez6969, it was really inexplicable how pitchfork ignored the decade-defining artistic triumph of the Glands, who are usually ubiquitous on critics lists and readers polls alike. What clowns.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
being unhappy or happy with the results seems so bizarre to me
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
I get it, to some extent. You can become a fan of a song, album or act the same the same way you become a fan of football teams. You want your favorite to "win." But that's where the analogy ends. Art isn't a competitive sport like football, where the goal is to "win."
I like to see my favorite acts do well, but I'm not unhappy with a list if they don't.
I really liked P2K's list, BTW.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
I liked the P2K list because of the writing, not because of the albums on it.
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
Art isn't a competitive sport like football, where the goal is to "win." - hey, speak for yourself, buddy. When it comes to aesthetics, if you're not first, you're last.
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
lol. Okay, okay. And yeah, the writing on the P2K list is v. good.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
There are two nice things about Lala: one is that you can stream anything in the site's library once for free. (Great way to sample stuff you haven't heard.) The other is that if you use the Music Mover, you can stream anything that you already own an indefinite number of times. It doesn't physically upload your music; it just recognizes matches on your hard drive of songs that are in its library and makes those songs available for repeated listens. The Music Mover is not a requirement for joining Lala, however. Also: all of this is free. You only pay if you want to download a song from Lala (89 cents, I believe) or if you want to stream a song indefinitely that you don't already own (10 cents).
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
being unhappy or happy with the results seems so bizarre to methe form of a numerical list invites that though. something like abc order would have been less contentious, less football of them. unless wait the list itself is some form of meta-anti-competitive protest. . . .
― kamerad, Saturday, 3 October 2009 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
There are two nice things about Lala: one is that you can stream anything in the site's library once for free.
This is good to know. I actually stopped an album that was streaming on Lala, because I realized the song had gone on long past the normal :30 sample-time, and I wonderined if I was ordering it by default. Anyway, another nice thing I discovered about Lala is that its Music Mover doesn't try to trump competing download managers. I tried downloading something from eMusic immediately after I downloaded my first Lala disc, and there were no problems at all.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
"Anybody else notice or mention Separation Sunday placed higher than Boys and Girls in America?
Of course it did; it's a much better album."
General consensus seems to usually say otherwise.
― Evan, Saturday, 3 October 2009 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
General consensus can be, and is this case, wrong!
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 3 October 2009 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
Though I was unhappy to see Boys & Girls rather than Stay Positive.
Yeah I just didn't expect it!
― Evan, Saturday, 3 October 2009 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
I love The Hold Steady, but I guess I'm with the general concensus. Boys & Girls has a much richer sound, and much better and more interesting arrangements, than Separation Sunday. Also, the prominent keyboards give Boys & Girls a dimension that the earlier albums didn't have.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah it is absolutely more melody driven; less riff driven.
― Evan, Saturday, 3 October 2009 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
i like b&g better too but may be a first one you heard thing. actually tho of all their albums i've listened to sep sunday the least.
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Saturday, 3 October 2009 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
i think among stans SS is the materpiece record - among critics & normals it's B&G
― the rap battle of algiernod (k3vin k.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
^^this
― autogoon delight (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
and amongst super stans, it's really about lifter puller
I'm really, really surprised that Unwound's Leaves Turn Inside You didn't make the list at all.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
Also, maybe I'm still in the first love stage with Fever Ray, but I kept expecting it to pop up, even in the top 50 zone.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
Seven Swans is perhaps the best Christian-based album ever.
wait what
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
Amy Grant & J.S. Bach to thread among many, many others
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Plus I hear some sort of Mountain animals that player geetar just released an album.
― I'M LEGALLY A MIDGET (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:18 (fifteen years ago)
sigh
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
Amy Grant v. Sufjan Stevens is an ILX fight I'd like to see. Bach v. either one seems like a mismatch.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
wow, my spelling has been terrible lately.
― I'M LEGALLY A MIDGET (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
Amy Grant v. Sufjan Stevens is an ILX fight I'd like to see. - Stryper should also contend in this battle
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
best Xian artist of all time-stryper-sugban-amy grant-bach
no "other" option & no whining abt it
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
no crabcore no credibility
― THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
Biz Markie isn't a Xian artist?
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
sugban stevens
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 3 October 2009 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
there should be parallel poll for Satanists (not the showman pretenders, but the real doodz like Gorogoth, Burzum, Venom, Morbid Angel, Jimi Page? & the like) & winners of either poll should be go heads-up for the ultimate god vs. satan ILM showdown.
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
Ultimate God v. Satan showdown?
Uhhh . . . to do that right, you first need to poll the great Jewish artists, too. Like KISS, Matisyahu and Flavor Flav.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:07 (fifteen years ago)
"I'm really, really surprised that Unwound's Leaves Turn Inside You didn't make the list at all."
Me too. Maybe they just forgot it...
― Evan, Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:08 (fifteen years ago)
I did as well, although given that Dirty Projectors only placed at 56, I was more...expecting Fever Ray to pop up before 50 and later hoping that it would somehow sneak through after it. It really is a remarkable piece of work. (I might like it more than Silent Shout? Unclear.)
― MTLiens (Alex in Montreal), Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
xpost to Daniel Esq: Their music doesn't reflect their theology, tho. Still, "Jesus vs. Satan" would simplify things considerably (but, then, what of Mormons? Should Low be included?)
This could get messy really quick. Probably best to stick w/ JD's original script.
― cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
Low would demolish them all.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
Low v. Satan.
Sep Sunday >>>>>> Boys & Girls
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Saturday, 3 October 2009 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
― xhuxk mangione (deej), Saturday, 3 October 2009 23:27 (fifteen years ago)
Better lyrics, better delivery, through-line gives it a sustained LP-length dynamic, better guitar solos, less cheesy organ
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 3 October 2009 23:40 (fifteen years ago)
Where you come out on these two discs, it seems to me, depends on whether you think the focus on organs in Boys & Girls is a help or hindrance. I think the organ adds a (frankly, needed) element to their sound.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 3 October 2009 23:44 (fifteen years ago)
When I think of Boys & Girls I'm reminded of piano more than organ.
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 00:20 (fifteen years ago)
Surprised that these didn't show up in the Top 200:
Scott Walker, The DriftFever Ray,Fever RaySmog,Dongs of SevotionBjork,MedullaBrian Wilson,SmileSantigold,SantogoldMum,Yesterday Was Dramatic - Today Is OkayFlying Lotus,Los AngelesMU,Afro Finger and Gel
These seemed strangely ignored by Pitchfork as well:
cLOUDDEAD,cLOUDDEADThe Soft Pink Truth,Do You Party?Reflection Eternal,Train of Thought
― untrue pitch, Sunday, 4 October 2009 00:47 (fifteen years ago)
Does anyone listen to "Smile" these days?
No Scott Walker is a surprise, yes. I didn't think the cLOUDDEAD album had much staying power with critics, although I happened to listen to it a couple of weeks ago and it's definitely underrated.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 4 October 2009 01:19 (fifteen years ago)
I thought the record by At the Drive-In from the early part of the decade would make it. That was pretty big when it came out.
― kornrulez6969, Sunday, 4 October 2009 01:21 (fifteen years ago)
Another surprise, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah. Even weirder because that was one of the bands that Pitchfork broke
Drunk on their own influence at the time. There's already been an apology on Leno, promise of extended vacations for self-discovery etc.
― Cunga, Sunday, 4 October 2009 01:45 (fifteen years ago)
Bright Like Neon Love >> In Ghost Colours but the first one didn't chart.
― abanana, Sunday, 4 October 2009 02:15 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think At the Drive-In was ever a big deal to Pitchfork, but it might be close to the top of a AP magazine list.
And I don't think Pitchfork agrees with abanana: "If the pastichey Bright Like Neon Love felt more like an opportunistic patchwork quilt of other people's sounds and ideas, the hugely enjoyable In Ghost Colours feels light, confident, and unencumbered by the dictates of fashion."
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 03:56 (fifteen years ago)
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.)
Yeah it's true, back in the day Bach recorded the best christian albums.
― Moka, Sunday, 4 October 2009 08:02 (fifteen years ago)
When the placement is only seperated by 20 albums (outside of the top 20 obviously), they're so close together that they're essentially tied..
― billstevejim, Sunday, 4 October 2009 08:10 (fifteen years ago)
Thanks to all for the guidance with Lala. I love the service's P2K special. The normal pricing seems to me to be a midpoint between eMusic and iTunes. At that price-point, I'd normally want to search out the physical discs (if I can't get it via eMusic). Still, some of the normal pricing looks pretty good to me, e.g., Prince's Sign O The Times ($10 for the double-disc).
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 October 2009 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not one to complain about this list -- it's predictable (I figured out the entire top 20 beforehand), but the majority of the writing was enjoyable. That's why I check out Pfork in the first place. I couldn't care less if albums I rate score highly on their 10.0 ranking scale or place on the year end lists. Eventually, they come around to many things after the fact (Discovery, Rooty, Voodoo, Badu, etc.) and many others score highly and then drop off the radar completely (Clap Your Hands is only one example of what must be dozens). In the end, it's a bunch of music critics ranking their fav albums at the time of publishing, whether that is an individual album review or a decade-end top 200 list. The scoring/placement is arbitrary in the first place, then goes on to evolve over time as perceptions change and tastes evolve. What's the point in getting upset about any of the placements?
If there's one record I was surprised to see left off the list, though -- Fantastic Damage. I think it's one of the most cohesive artistic statements of the decade and holds together really well, and I'd figure a number of Pfork writers feel the same way. But then, hip hop in general seems a bit low-placed on the list, so I'm not really that surprised, in retrospect.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Sunday, 4 October 2009 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
ugh i do not like that record
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Sunday, 4 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
Woah, yeah "Smile" was really wonderful. Definitely in my top 10 of 2kx, if not the top 5. Helluva lot better than most of the stuff on the list. Was it disqualified?
― Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 4 October 2009 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
agree Smile should have been in there...
― Dan S, Sunday, 4 October 2009 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
Another under-appreciated album(s) is the Low Level Owl Volumes 1 and 2 by Appleseed Cast. Those records go way above any accusation of "emo" typically associated with their work as a whole.
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
They'd be up there on my list.
The only reason anyone likes those AC records is the clever palindrome title and precious artwork. They are indistinct from mid-period Jimmy Eat World. The end.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Sunday, 4 October 2009 18:51 (fifteen years ago)
OOOOOooooOOOoooohhhh whoooaaa booo-oooy!
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Sunday, 4 October 2009 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure Low Level Owl isn't a palindrome.
― CosMc (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 4 October 2009 19:05 (fifteen years ago)
It is if it is the owl from Winnie-the-Pooh.
― That's not just me saying that, that's the Pentagon. (contenderizer), Sunday, 4 October 2009 19:06 (fifteen years ago)
There's a Logan's Run policy re: older musicians. How Sonic Youth and Yo La Tengo have dodged it I still don't know.
― Cunga, Sunday, 4 October 2009 19:18 (fifteen years ago)
Owl, holding a copy of the PFM list:
http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/6500000/Owl-winnie-the-pooh-6509604-368-400.jpg
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 4 October 2009 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
"The only reason anyone likes those AC records is the clever palindrome title and precious artwork. They are indistinct from mid-period Jimmy Eat World. The end."
Listen to those specific records and tell me one little thing that sounds anything like Jimmy Eat World.
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
And the only artwork is a picture of a feather so I don't know what ones you are thinking of.
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
no acre thrills ?!?!?
― Lowell N. Behold'n, Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
People who hate Appleseed Cast probably do for reasons I'll bet you won't find on LLO V. 1 & 2.
― Evan, Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
U.S. Maple does not feel like a band. U.S. Maple feels like a singular entity. U.S. Maple, a contradiction in and of itself, and a contradiction in sound, chaotic and disorganized in order to form a sort of unstructured structure, creating beauty and unpredictability out of fucked-up randomness. It sounds weird. It twists around an idea without warning and transforms into another then snaps back to the first. It rambles, seemingly aimlessly at first glance, but by the end, everything has taken its natural course, and nothing was truly out of place.
― waldo geraldo faldo (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
^ That's a pretty mouthed way of saying "Al burps."
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
Owen poos
― waldo geraldo faldo (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
sorry!
― waldo geraldo faldo (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 October 2009 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
Re: US Maple, I love that band but they were a 90s band, even in the 00s.
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Sunday, 4 October 2009 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
stfu ott the low level owl records rule--lol you don't even know how to sound jaded anymore
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 5 October 2009 00:56 (fifteen years ago)
Isn't Ott the former Pitchfork writer who posts on that other message board (Hiperion, or something like that)? Didn't know he posted here.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 01:02 (fifteen years ago)
he only posts on threads about p4k.....HMMMMMM
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 5 October 2009 01:06 (fifteen years ago)
I know the talk about kid a was about 1000 responses back there but I just listened to the whole thing after years of not doing it and I didn't get why people here were talking about how it sounds warp-derivative. Asides from the two opening tracks nothing on the album sounds particulary akin to any artist on the warp label.
― Moka, Monday, 5 October 2009 02:54 (fifteen years ago)
They are indistinct from mid-period Jimmy Eat World.
In fairness though there is pretty much no band past or present of whom this cannot be truly & rightly said
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Monday, 5 October 2009 03:01 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't realize there was a "mid-period" Jimmy Eat World, distinct from an "early period" Jimmy Eat World and a "late period" Jimmy Eat World.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 03:12 (fifteen years ago)
I thought it was all just one seamless "Jimmy Eat World."
Jimmy's is the art that conceals art.
― We're gonna destroy their van, we're gonna destroy their faces (Jon Lewis), Monday, 5 October 2009 03:19 (fifteen years ago)
the ages of jimmy eat world by J0hn DI. protozoan. early practices in petri dish & on swabsII. mesozoic. showcase @ cave later determined by archaeologist as early sxsw siteIII. mid-period. era of recorded music. clarity, bleed american, never been kissed soundtrackIV. latter. most future music recorded by android replicas of jimmy eat world, all royalties direct to surviving heirs of drummer zach lind
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Monday, 5 October 2009 03:22 (fifteen years ago)
Wiki:
The band's name came from a crayon drawing made after an incident between Linton's younger brothers, Jim and Ed, who fought frequently. Jim usually won, but Ed got his revenge by drawing a picture of Jim shoving the Earth into his mouth; the picture bore the caption "Jimmy eat world"
Genius.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 03:25 (fifteen years ago)
whatta fukken story
― wilter, Monday, 5 October 2009 03:26 (fifteen years ago)
Reading that Wiki entry reminds me that, aside from a few bands -- Nirvana, obv. -- I pretty much missed the 90s, entirely.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 03:27 (fifteen years ago)
Upon closer inspection, I see a good deal of this band's discography is from the 00s. So I've now missed two consecutive decades, apparently.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 03:37 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel, I get the impression that you've come to Pitchfork/indie stuff fairly recently. If you don't mind me asking, what prompted your interest? And what were you listening to before that, if anything?
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 5 October 2009 04:01 (fifteen years ago)
Its funny because Chris Ott and I have really close tastes from what I've seen but he is so hateful of some things.
― Evan, Monday, 5 October 2009 04:39 (fifteen years ago)
I found his favorite of the 90s list somewhere and thats how I discovered my favorite band The Swirlies.
― Evan, Monday, 5 October 2009 04:41 (fifteen years ago)
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, October 5, 2009 4:01 AM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark
^^yes. I'd also be interested to know what path you've taken to get to your current musical tastes, jaymc. (maybe this stuff is already on a different thread).
― Dan S, Monday, 5 October 2009 04:51 (fifteen years ago)
Jaymc/Dan S: Through the middle of high-school, I listened to whatever was playing on commercial radio (late 70s to early 80s) and The Beatles. Toward the end of high school and the beginning of undergraduate, I discovered MTV, new wave, and underground/college rock, which struck a nerve with me. I was passionate about music through my time in graduate school.
That changed when I went to law school (1992 -- 1995). Between school and my girlfriend (now wife), I had no time to keep up with music. Nothing changed in that regard while I was a young associate. I moved to my current firm in 2000. The internet made it easy to discover new music, and -- especially when I became a partner here a year or two after joining the firm -- I had more freedom and (somewhat more) control over my time. That inspired me to reconnect with music. I found music blogs, and eventually moved on to Pitchfork and eMusic in the last few years.
It's still hard to find time for music (between work pressures and spending time with my family). But it's important to me to stay somewhat connected, especially as I get older. I also started taking classical guitar and piano lessons, and studying some music theory. I'll never be any good, mind you (I'm terrible, TBH), but it's something I promised myself I would do long ago, and I'm just now getting around to it.
Sorry to bore you ("tl;dr," I'm sure).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
Good Lord, I've bored myself. Apologies.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 08:52 (fifteen years ago)
no way man--it's a good story!
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 5 October 2009 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
ty. It's being adapted as a screenplay now.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 11:09 (fifteen years ago)
One follow-up question about Lala. If I upload my music to it (via Lala's Music Mover software), does that mean I can stream whatever from my collection is in Lala's catalogue, all the time and for free? That could be a nice benefit. OTOH, with 14k songs in my iTunes library, I imagine uploading the whole thing is a full weekend project.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
I've been on a Jimmy Eat World tear all day.
― cee-oh-tee-tee, Monday, 5 October 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
early period, mid period, latter day first incarnation, the comeback years...?
― omar little, Monday, 5 October 2009 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
They are rested, ready, and still bearing that stupid name.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 17:45 (fifteen years ago)
Daniel, I joined lala because they offer every album for $7.49, whereas emusic had a very recent 22 track album for ... 22 credits. Presently, I'm uploading. It found 15k tracks in the server cloud, but uploading the other 15k tracks (all correctly labeled) is estimated to take 30 days. 4 days down, 26 to go.
― St. Matthew reindeer (Derelict), Monday, 5 October 2009 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
If I upload my music to it (via Lala's Music Mover software), does that mean I can stream whatever from my collection is in Lala's catalogue, all the time and for free?
Yes.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 5 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
That's a great service, but O_O --
uploading the other 15k tracks (all correctly labeled) is estimated to take 30 days. 4 days down, 26 to go.
-- what a price to pay. Do you have to keep your PC on, continuously, for a month in order to upload?
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
Mine took two or three days, I think, for roughly the same amount.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 5 October 2009 18:50 (fifteen years ago)
thanks for the background, Daniel!
― Dan S, Monday, 5 October 2009 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
^^yes. I'd also be interested to know what path you've taken to get to your current musical tastes, jaymc.
Oh, you're asking me, Dan S? (I just noticed this.)
My story's pretty simple. Didn't really pay attention to music until I was 11. Listened to a lot of top 40 at first, then briefly dallied with rap/R&B radio in 9th grade, then alt-rock radio, which segued into indie rock in late high school and college. Got into post-rock and electronic stuff in college, too. At the same time, I was sort of consciously refining my tastes to the point where by 2000 it seemed like half the stuff I bought could be traced back to someone in Tortoise within three steps. So after college: started taking cues from Pitchfork (more indie rock). And then in 2003 the converging influences of ILM, P2P downloading, and Justin Timberlake turned me into a standard-issue Internet dilettante.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 5 October 2009 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
So Justin's the catalyst, eh?
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 October 2009 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
lolzgood story, not very simple, though!
― Dan S, Monday, 5 October 2009 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/16/Drevil_million_dollars.jpg
The details of my life are quite inconsequential...
― The Book of Outhere (HI DERE), Monday, 5 October 2009 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
Ha!
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 October 2009 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
In some ways! Well, in late 2002, I had this vague notion to reacquaint myself with hip-hop. And even though I was mostly interested in the Def Jux stuff that Pitchfork enthused about, I think I was starting to become much more open to BEATS in general than I'd previously been. So when I chanced upon "Cry Me a River" on the radio in early 2003, it was kind of a revelation.
― katherine helmand province (jaymc), Monday, 5 October 2009 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
i'd be curious to know how many ppl started w/def jux and traded it in for the real thing eventually
― yellow card for favre (call all destroyer), Monday, 5 October 2009 22:41 (fifteen years ago)
*raises hand
― een, Monday, 5 October 2009 23:44 (fifteen years ago)
Don't get me wrong. I like listening to Kanye. I'm just saying,sampling music like whoa! and having witty (read: not poetic. just humorous.) lyrics only makes you a really good rapper with catchy hooks. it does not make you a genius. He is not exactly reinventing a genre.(also error on my previous comment. i meant to clarify that arcade fire belongs on the list but i just wouldn't place them as high as pitchfork chose to. [not that i expected them to do otherwise of course given the perfect 10 it recieved])Posted by: Elliot
― the rap battle of algiernod (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 6 October 2009 03:44 (fifteen years ago)
Arcade Fire didn't get a 10.
― Evan, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 03:51 (fifteen years ago)
O__O
― wilter, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 03:52 (fifteen years ago)
For all those asking about me in this thread, I'm back. Explanation:
SOCKSPOTTING 2009
― kshighway1, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:12 (fifteen years ago)
welcome back!
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:18 (fifteen years ago)
Anyway, obviously I was following this thread and the P2k albums list. Really not too surprised Kid A took the top spot; I wrote the following upthread:
Apparently they didn't mind the same record topping the list.
The placement I'm most displeased with is Joanna Newsom's Ys, but what can you do.
― kshighway1, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 04:21 (fifteen years ago)
Thanks, Bee OK!
I'm with you about Ys, kshighway1...
― Dan S, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 05:11 (fifteen years ago)
I think Ys is similar to say, The Drift (which didn't place), in the sense that it's usually an album that is listened to a couple times, then appreciated from a distance. Not to say that's the right way to go about it... just a point of comparison.
― I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
it was so nice to have k$highway back, i welcomed him
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 8 October 2009 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney, congrats on finishing your book! (Saw the news on the Twitter.) Looking forward to reading it.
― kshighway1, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:11 (fifteen years ago)
The Arcade Fire album got that (in)famous 9.7.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:17 (fifteen years ago)
Ys is one of my fave records of the decade, but it's not exactly "forward thinking". The Drift, on the other hand... I do not understand this "appreciated from a distance" thing. I listen to it every Valentine's Day.
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:04 (fifteen years ago)
appreciated from a distance = "Cool record, bro. Now I'm gonna play something I actually enjoy."
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:06 (fifteen years ago)
Cunga OTM re The Drift. I can't listen to something that harrowing regularly. If I had to listen to even just, fuck, "Jesse" on a daily basis I'd go fucking crazy.
That being said, I'm really glad to hear you rank Ys highly too, Owen! It seems like there is a small contingent out there that thinks that album is immense, although to my mind that contingent is way too small. This will be a cult record like "In The Aeroplane Over the Sea," I think, although the cult will always be much smaller. That Neutral Milk Hotel record is far more immediate, and it takes much more to engage with Newsom's masterpiece.
― kshighway1, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
"I love it but would it look good above the mantlepiece?"
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:51 (fifteen years ago)
Ys took a long time for me, with the weirdly chopped up VDP arrangements, but it's a stronger argument for "analog recording forever" than any Tape Op manifesto or Albini diatribe.
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:56 (fifteen years ago)
You really can't go wrong with the team of Albini and O'Rourke. If I ever put out a record, those would be the exact two people I'd want to help me produce it.
Lots of great details on the making of Ys in Erik Davis's wonderful profile for Arthur:
http://www.arthurmag.com/2006/12/23/nearer-the-heart-of-things-erik-davis-on-joanna-newsom-from-arthur-no-25winter-02006
― kshighway1, Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:03 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that Arthur article is great. Didn't it win an award? Although I'm totally with you on the lauding of the name-brand engineer and mixer, I equally love Parenthetical Girls' "Entanglements", which was recorded by Jherek Bischoff with many overdubs on an M-Box.
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:11 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know if it won an award, but it was in Best Music Writing 2007.
I've never heard the Parenthetical Girls' record, but I'm listening to the samples on Amazon right now and it sounds incredible!
― kshighway1, Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:33 (fifteen years ago)
^ Don't hesitate. It's my favourite record of the decade. It is a challenge, it is extremely rewarding.
My feathers ruffled about that Scott Walker "appreciated from distance" remark just because it's this sort of attitude is exactly why Pitchfork's version of the 00s appears to be so conservative. The 10.0 rating system relies upon a quantitative analysis, one that makes the pretense of exhaustivity. And if you're going to start assessing The World's Albums on a quantitative level, you're going to start eliminating the "less functional" records, such as The Drift.
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:26 (fifteen years ago)
Floridity vs. formality, I guess -- it may be strange to call The Drift florid, but this discussion reminds me of how the Associates are just seen as a hard to get into indulgence when the insanely expressive genius of Fourth Drawer Down and Sulk rises far above the enjoyable functionality of many of its peers.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
on the other hand pfork by addressing music the way they do is making a list of LESS functional records ... purely by the nature of treating music commerce as art ... a song doesnt get praised on some "this would be such a dope song to hear at weddings" type shit (or rarely does -- might have been a defense of a couple R&B singles on the list lol)
― i got nothin (deej), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
Since when did 8.3 become the new 9.0? Remember this?
10.0: Essential9.5-9.9: Spectacular9.0-9.4: Amazing8.5-8.9: Exceptional; will likely rank among writer's top ten albums of the year8.0-8.4: Very good7.5-7.9: Above average; enjoyable7.0-7.4: Not brilliant, but nice enough6.0-6.9: Has its moments, but isn't strong5.0-5.9: Mediocre; not good, but not awful4.0-4.9: Just below average; bad outweighs good by just a little bit3.0-3.9: Definitely below average, but a few redeeming qualities2.0-2.9: Heard worse, but still pretty bad1.0-1.9: Awful; not a single pleasant track0.0-0.9: Breaks new ground for terrible
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
what's that from, evan?
― samosa gibreel, Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
spectacular > amazing because music is supposed to be spectacle?
― sunn o))) successor (Curt1s Stephens), Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
yeah those top three are silly
― samosa gibreel, Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
they're all pretty silly which is why they don't post that on the anymore
― mark cl, Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
^^^yup
― don't blame pitchfork, blame america (call all destroyer), Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not against rating systems but it's silly to have a 100-point scale for something so vague and imprecise as music criticism. even moreso for something so vague and imprecise as Pitchfork music criticism.
― sunn o))) successor (Curt1s Stephens), Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
That was the old "Rating Key" on Pitchforkmedia in the old days.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
I always liked the very functional model of "Skip it" < "Try it" < "Buy it".
Although, now that music is free, it could be further simplified to "Yes" and "No".
― Tourtiere (Owen Pallett), Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
Thats the model they have over at soundopinions.com. The Chicago radio show with Jim and Greg.
Haha I like the Yes No model.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, No, best heard through someone else's earbuds, five seconds worth hearing via a passing car, movie trailer option...
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
The download high consumption culture has gotten so bad that when I gave a bunch of old albums to my teenage cousin to check out, she ripped them and deleted the album information so it was all songs. She had such a disinterest in the "album" that she didn't even want to know how each track was sequenced, since she had been brought up on a lot of these sideways haircut pop rockers and I guess treats every song like a single. I don't what the explanation is and if she told me I was too shocked to remember what she said. It probably was just a "I don't know" kind of thing. I'm still very disturbed.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
That'll be a story in the next decade: what do we do about music fans who grew up with the shuffle button and don't have the patience for an entire album. Maybe bands will adapt to changing attention spans and start releasing more EPs, but people will have to adapt.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
what do we do about music fans
Nothing? (Who's the 'we,' after all -- which I realize your post grapples with.)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
We being anybody who takes a big interest in music - either making it, reviewing it, talking about it with others, marketing it etc.
when Evan gave his cousin the albums he assumed she'd listen to them as albums, and not as a collection of 8-20 songs to be dumped into her mp3 player or an external hard drive and heard inconsistently and out of sequence.
So if he gave her the Stone Roses debut, it's possible she won't hear it in sequence and all at once, but she'll first hear "She Bangs the Drums" on her iPod while jogging, in-between something by the Killers and T.I. Then she might hear another song some other time, she may listen to a few songs in a row if she's curious - but she may not ever hear every song, and she probably won't hear it altogether in one sitting. So they're experiencing the music in two different ways, and that'll impact what they think of it in the end.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I mean its one thing if she just ripped them and shuffled them, but she DELETED the evidence to what albums they are from and the order. There was effort involved in making sure she didn't know anything about how these albums are put together. Thats what was significant to me. I didn't realize segments of music fans were at that point in our culture yet until then.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:48 (fifteen years ago)
And the Stone Roses debut can be heard as a collection of great songs (so the experience won't suffer that much), but what happens if he gave her an album that's greater than the sum of the songs? So by "how do we deal" I mean how do we reconcile the new ways some people are actually listening to and discovering music with the way things we done before.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
that's kind of cool tbh! i kind of wish i could hear half my record collection that way again - divorced from the context entirely so i can just, i don't know, hear it
it's one of my favorite things about radio imo - i'm hearing the song for what it is and just that. obviously i want to know the context later - who it is, what year it came out, what kind of role it played in the context of its genre, etc, which may separate me from someone like your cousin who doesn't want to know at all who it is. but i definitely think there's a huge value in hearing stuff separated from the context
― mark cl, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
a lot of albums come w/ all kinds of crit & cult baggage that sometimes i just don't give a shit about, and that can actually make me feel less inclined to give an album its time
― mark cl, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
obv it works the other way around too - that baggage makes me want to check it out. but there's something kind of cool & intriguing about your cousin's way of listening that i kind of admire. even tho it might drive me crazy eventually
― mark cl, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
I'm with you- I love listening to albums out of context too, but to delete the album information completely is another thing altogether. Its like a statement. I don't know.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
and start releasing more EPs
I think this would be kinda cool; I often find myself with either too little time or lacking the attention span to engage with a full album, but would still like to listen to a "totality" of sorts.
And I'm not one of the mp3-age kids, I'm 40 and grew up with albums. OTOH, those were vinyl LPs plus cassettes, so actually then there was a natural partition (sides) into approximately EP-sized chunks. For many albums I know and love well, the two sides have very different, um, shapes and colours in my head.
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
I wonder if, from a PR standpoint, it would be more profitable in this celebrity-hero age for a pop star to have 4-7 songs out every 12 months, as opposed to one album every two years.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
Probably. Then more songs can be treated as singles, keeping the artist fresh to a culture where you are old news after half a month.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
Plus pop-star fans and casual listeners would buy albums for a song or two, these days you can just download those specific songs without the rest of the album. If they were released in smaller increments people might pay attention to all, say, four tracks being released at a given moment, where otherwise three out of four of those tracks may be almost totally ignored.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
...if released all together on a eleven song album.
― Evan, Saturday, 10 October 2009 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
Thanks, Owen. I'll check out the Parenthetical Girls and get back to you here if I remember! :-)
― kshighway1, Sunday, 11 October 2009 04:58 (fifteen years ago)
there should be a poll of which album had the best write-up. i'd vote silent shout:
There are certain aesthetics so whole and singular that we use them as shorthand to refer to other things-- stuff can be Lynchian, Dickensian, Pynchonesque. Repeated exposure to this record makes it tempting to start describing things-- say, a bird of prey circling an ice-covered lighthouse-- as Silent Shout-ian.
― samosa gibreel, Sunday, 11 October 2009 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
I wonder if, from a PR standpoint, it would be more profitable in this celebrity-hero age for a pop star to have 4-7 songs out every 12 months, as opposed to one album every two years.― Cunga
― Cunga
Was thinking about this yesterday (in response to this thread, I think). About the idea that record companies might become more like writer/producer/performer stables, releasing a steady stream of singles & videos based on whatever seemed to be working best at the time. No pressure to produce complete albums as artist statements, no incentive to release distracting filler of any sort (except maybe as a bonus for fans). Just crank out singles with someone's name on them, and when this or that name starts to attract attention, arrange tours and licensing deals.
― a bleak, sometimes frightening portrait of ceiling cat (contenderizer), Sunday, 11 October 2009 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
Ppl are already working under the singles model. Rappers pretty much don't even make albums anymore
― wanna b_stanton somethin' (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 October 2009 00:05 (fifteen years ago)
^that's a pretty wide brush you're using, dude.
― 2009 Nominee, Best African (Whitey on the Moon), Monday, 12 October 2009 01:59 (fifteen years ago)
Whiney v. Whitey.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 12 October 2009 02:04 (fifteen years ago)
I'm just saying with the mixtape/street single model, it's basically just throwing a bunch of songs at the wall and seeing what sticks.
― wanna b_stanton somethin' (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:30 (fifteen years ago)
well I'll try to remember some of the hip-hop mix (not in order.. the only same artists back2back were Blackalicious and Flynn Adam.. I regretted the Flynn Adam being back to back because they are too similar.. the 3 tracks with Pigeon John are very different)Life Without Buildings - The Leanover (not rap - but was the first track - found thanks to NickB on ilx)Souls of Mischief - 93 'til InfinitySaul Williams - Black StacyBlackalicious - Alphabet Aerobics -into-> Chemical CalisthenicsThe Fugees - Nappy HeadsPigeon John - CheerleadersPigoeon John & Freedom of Soul - Not this RecordPigeon John & Kiz Charizmatic - Wow! (out there)Flynn Adam - Such a TimeFlynn Adam - Just Don't Get ItBlackstar - DefinitionTalib Kweli - The BlastJurassic 5 - Concrete StreetsKyteman - Une Seule Fois (feat. Reazun)Kyteman - She Blew Like Trumpets (the only song I regret putting on the mix)The Black Eyed Peas - Rap SongN.O.R.E ft. Tego Calderon & Nina Sky - Oye Mi CantoPharcyde - Passing Me By (edited because it's so long)Madvillain - Great Day (found thanks to ilx)
I'm thinking I'll replace the Kyteman song with K'naan - Wavin' Flag next time I make this mixThat's the only replacement I can think of now... but If I had time to listen to some more k'naan and some lifesavs and damian marley I might change up this mix a good bit
― CaptainLorax, Monday, 11 January 2010 05:59 (fifteen years ago)
Thread brings back memories.
massive lols at Whiney's Will Smith YouTube autoplay
― kshighway (ksh), Monday, 11 January 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
what should I switch up on the mix?
― CaptainLorax, Monday, 11 January 2010 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
i mean what else would fit
― CaptainLorax, Monday, 11 January 2010 06:07 (fifteen years ago)
a kashi granola bar with a hacky-sack stapled to it
― ke$nan (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 11 January 2010 06:09 (fifteen years ago)
well obviously it's mostly happy rap, I can't stand ghetto/booty shit
― CaptainLorax, Monday, 11 January 2010 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
dat nigga delmar to thread
― balearific, Monday, 11 January 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)