The Wire Vs Careless Talk Cost Lives Vs NME

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Which is the best? I will only subscribe to one. (CTCL writers,should you answer give me VERY good reasons why I should subscribe. What will be covered in the next 2 issues etc)

Lisa, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

the best= the gig guide in each mag (haf only looked at CTCL once but I'm sure they have one) (and the ads for rec shops). In terms of content the wire is the 'best' of a sorry lot so that's not saying a lot.

you don't need to read this stuff. the music is in your head. remeber that 'indie kid'.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, I don't think there is a gig guide in CTCL...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

What is actually in CTCL?

Emma, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Mojo is better. Covers obscure bands from the past(no other mag does) and isnt the beatles/dylan/floyd/young bible it once was. Cvers new music too. The White Stripes are even on the cover this month. I guess you need to buy several magazines a month to get your fill of music,if you're open minded. Theres not one 'complete' magazine sadly. But i'd say forget about NME.

Chris, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Try Careless Elves Costs Lives.

Ian, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Theres a feature on Mick Collins/Dirtbombs. So Mojo is obviously where dead CTCL journos end up! Theres also an MC5 feature.Son House, Psychedelic Furs and Bobby Womack.

Ian, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

If you're a music fan, you'll probably prefer CTCL. If you don't like dry arid writing, you'll probably prefer CTCL. If you don't like being patronised and treated like a 13 year old retard, you'll probably prefer CTCL. If you enjoy smart, witty, passionate writing and photography and illustrations, you'll probably prefer CTCL.

Then again, you may not. It's not my place to tell you what you should or shouldn't buy. All we try to do is cover the music we LOVE in a sassy, informed and passionate manner - and aim to communicate the enthusiasm we feel to others. We enhance the pleasure you draw from listening to great records: we don't claim to be taste-leaders or elitists or set agendas.

But possibly we do, and are, anyway.

The paper quality is superb.

You want a list of bands in the next two issues: man, we sure as hell don't work that way. We go on passion and wit and spontaneity, and fuck everything else. You can check out previous band lists and (a little) writing and photography at www.carelesstalkcostslives.com - I wasn't actually going to advertise the site here, because ILM is sacred. But hell. I hate typing out lists.

Oh, and you won't get many lists either. Unless we change our minds.

Jerry, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I wasn't actually going to advertise the site here, because ILM is sacred

Half of us here seem to write for it anyway, I say plug the link away if you like. :-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Nicky Wire: dud. Public Enemy: dud. WWII Propaganda: classic. Simple, no?

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Nah, seriously. The NME is the perfect place to go if you've just (I mean, like five minutes ago) got into music. It'll name a sufficient amount of musical bands, and degenerate all that nasty dance/pop/"ethnic" music for you, so you can concentrate on your guitars/Eminem/shitty dance.

The Wire... I've only read once. It seemed like Record Collector with better quality paper

Careless Talk Costs Lives... eh. I don't call myself a writer, I've only written for it once... It's got stuff you'll love, it's got stuff you'll hate, but at least it'll have stuff to solicit an emotion other than "Steve Sutherland and Mark Beamount should both take an axe to the skull, whilst April Long is buggered by the hounds of hell, and Imran Ahmed is forced to watch".

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"If you're a music fan, you'll probably prefer CTCL"

FUCK OFF

Bob Zemko, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I knew someone would hate that line - that's why I also added the rejoinder... "but you may not".

Or didn't you read that part?

Jerry, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Jerry- "but you may not"...but why? you seem to be suggesting that ppl who don't like CTCL are not ''a music fan'' that they do not ''enjoy smart, witty, passionate writing and photography and illustrations'' and that they don't mind ''being patronised and treated like a 13 year old retard''.

FUCK OFF!!!

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I would say - NME - cause I write for it and also it is good for a quick read/glance for the bands and happenings in london for the week. when it's on - it's old school nme and it is sweet - when it is off - it's pretty bad.

'cause hey, some of us don't have time to read an eight page article about the senseless things.

but mostly i read books.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

it's not so much that line in particular; rather your post, your magazine and especially you.

"man, we sure as hell don't work that way. We go on passion and wit and spontaneity, and fuck everything else."

Yeeah! Sounds good!

FUCK OFF with your paper quality

Bob Zemko, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Christ Bob, did he steal your girlfriend or something?

Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''I would say - NME - cause I write for it and also it is good for a quick read/glance for the bands and happenings in london for the week.''

The bands NME covers are mostly rubbish doomie.

'''cause hey, some of us don't have time to read an eight page article about the senseless things.

but mostly i read books.''

so lets go through this one: you don't have time for an eight page article but you have time for books.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

who has time for eight page articles on rock'n'roll? i'd rather listen to it than read it.

i just like the facts, ma'am. concise and simple and direct.

i would choose nme for indie and kerrang for punk rock coverage.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

(no, this is all 4 show! I'm just trying to scare people called jerry off dumbass anti-elitist elitism indie rhetoric for good. shh here he comes!)

"But hell. I hate typing out lists"

yay bitch! FUCK OFF!

Bob Zemko, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

yeaaaahhh julio! tag team! sic im!

Bob Zemko, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

why tag team? yuck. save yer indie gay wrestling antics for someone else!

i'm just in the music writing game for the free cds, bub.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie- why not read on the train. magazines are so thin on things to read mostly that you can finish it on one journey to work (that would apply to me but I don't know how far you have to commute, if at all).

''i just like the facts, ma'am. concise and simple and direct.''

not enough.

''i would choose nme for indie and kerrang for punk rock coverage.''

I thought 'punk' had died long ago. but you know that already.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie- why not read on the train. magazines are so thin on things to read mostly that you can finish it on one journey to work (that would apply to me but I don't know how far you have to commute, if at all).

Nah - I like getting my musical news from the newstand - a quick read - flip through - whilst waiting on a friend, that's when I read the magazines.

The NME is good 'cause you get coverage on the way to work and you've only spent £1.50 so you can trash it after reading it - it's the equivalant of an indie Heat Magazine. Wire/Etc - bore me please! Do I really want a sub - lester bangs article about some guy's life who reviews rock records veiled as a 'piece'. no way jose.

I like my music articles trashy, fun and easy.

''i just like the facts, ma'am. concise and simple and direct.''

not enough.

Enough for me.

''i would choose nme for indie and kerrang for punk rock coverage.''

I thought 'punk' had died long ago. but you know that already.

Depends - o.k., if you are to be pedantic - i like kerrang for a quick overview of loud noisy fuck you rock and roll.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

however - i find 'guides' the very worse. allmusic.com being the contender for a whole lot of schlock in one website. i usually use it when i burn cds and want to make sure that i've got all the songs, though. so that is something positive about allmusic.com.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

and I never think 'wow, what a well-written article' the best rock'n'roll writing inspires me to listen to the band not the writer. that's what i aim for, anyways.

'no self indulgence, please ma'am, i'm full up on the lester bangs and mash'

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

an editor called me a 'wannabe music journalist' and i had to correct him ... I am, at all times - a rock and roll fan.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''Wire/Etc - bore me please! Do I really want a sub - lester bangs article about some guy's life who reviews rock records veiled as a 'piece'. no way jose.''

yeah that was bad! though mark s did a nice rewrite (though no doubt you will rubbish it).

The wire can be dry at first. This months issue there really is fuck all apart from the article on Lou harrison (i like william parker but I'm starting to hate david keenan). But it depends what music you like I suppose (and since you write for the NME, i suspect you wouldn't). I think if NME did an article on Harry pussy or Boredoms (and they caught on to these things quickly) then I'd buy it again. Or that i felt there were things to discover every so often it would be good.

I know that andy capper likes boredoms. I've been away from the country for a while but hasn't there been an article on them, say?

At least w/Wire you know what reelases are coming out (again I like some of the music they cover) and you are gonna know when derek bailey is playin (next week w/prevost near hackney i think).

''i like kerrang for a quick overview of loud noisy fuck you rock and roll.''

terrorizer does the whole thing much better i think.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Surely the difference being (personal opinion aside) that the NME (alongside Kerrang) is music journalism, whilst Wire and CTCL are music criticism? It's a bit like comparing, say, the Times to Time, no?

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah that was bad! though mark s did a nice rewrite (though no doubt you will rubbish it).

i'm just mindful of ego. i did a beachwood sparks review that was beautiful written and almost poetry (teehee). The editor told me that it was a fantastic piece of writing and was impressed and then emailed me back and told me to rewrite it and I agreed with him. It was self indulgent to the person who did not know the beachwood sparks. the wire is for the music boffin with the bad breath boring everyone about their john cage collections.

The wire can be dry at first. This months issue there really is fuck all apart from the article on Lou harrison (i like william parker but I'm starting to hate david keenan).

The only time that I notice the author of music writing when it's dreadful. I can name a writer at the NME that comes to mind. But to be tactful I will not.

But it depends what music you like I suppose (and since you write for the NME, i suspect you wouldn't).

Huh?

I think if NME did an article on Harry pussy or Boredoms (and they caught on to these things quickly) then I'd buy it again. Or that i felt there were things to discover every so often it would be good.

Aaah. You are jaded. Better stick with Wire. The NME and Kerrang are for pop culture freaks.

I know that andy capper likes boredoms. I've been away from the country for a while but hasn't there been an article on them, say?

I saw a live review of the boredoms by andy capper. Though I have never met anyone at the NME. It's all done through email.

At least w/Wire you know what reelases are coming out (again I like some of the music they cover) and you are gonna know when derek bailey is playin (next week w/prevost near hackney i think).

*Yamusocrapn* Sorry - wasnt paying attention. ; - )

''i like kerrang for a quick overview of loud noisy fuck you rock and roll.''

terrorizer does the whole thing much better i think.

Can you buy terrorizer easily enough? I hate being inconvenienced by magazines. Defeats the purpose, does it not?

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

dom-the musical range is quite (a bit of overlap but not much) different. so if you want the news then there are websites that provide it. i wouldn't spend 5p on the NME when I could be reading a book or just listening to the sounds in the street as I wait for a friend.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Surely the difference being (personal opinion aside) that the NME (alongside Kerrang) is music journalism, whilst Wire and CTCL are music criticism? It's a bit like comparing, say, the Times to Time, no?

*yawwwnmusocraptalkyawwwn* What?

Personally and I talked to some people - no offence guys - but alot of people think that the wire has it's head stuck up it's own arse.

'Don't intellectualise my rock and roll' David Crosby

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

dom-the musical range is quite (a bit of overlap but not much) different. so if you want the news then there are websites that provide it. i wouldn't spend 5p on the NME when I could be reading a book or just listening to the sounds in the street as I wait for a friend.

And why would I spent £3.50 to £5.00 just to find out what new music is out this month? Convince me of that. i'm eighteen to twenty - i want to find out what new music sounds like - do I spend rather alot of money or do I spend £1.50 and maybe a coke and a Heat Magazine for the price of one magazine that is just boffin wank material?

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''Aaah. You are jaded. Better stick with Wire. The NME and Kerrang are for pop culture freaks.''

heh...here we go! I knew it would descend down the mis-informed, assumption making route. anyway, since when was the NME about 'pop culture'. I thought it was about 'indie' which is very different.

''But it depends what music you like I suppose (and since you write for the NME, i suspect you wouldn't).

Huh?''

I suspect you wouldn't like the music I like or the music the wire writes about, which is what I meant.

''i'm just mindful of ego. i did a beachwood sparks review that was beautiful written and almost poetry (teehee).''

you've got some ego problems of your own.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

before i go to bed - just want to say that nme and kerrang appeal me because it's a good pop culture fix. that's all. it's cheap and easy and bang bang bang - a good warholian fuck. you could say it is artless but in artlessness there is art - moreso and probably harder to write for than doing a 1000 word 'thesis' on beyonce and sonic youth. it's pop music. geez. we live in a attention deficient time. get with the program.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

heh...here we go! I knew it would descend down the mis-informed, assumption making route. anyway, since when was the NME about 'pop culture'. I thought it was about 'indie' which is very different.

define pop culture. i think mcdonalds is pop culture. more so than a tate exhibition about it.

''But it depends what music you like I suppose (and since you write for the NME, i suspect you wouldn't).

Huh?''

I suspect you wouldn't like the music I like or the music the wire writes about, which is what I meant.

and in that statement are you implying that the music that wire covers is inherently better or worse?

''i'm just mindful of ego. i did a beachwood sparks review that was beautiful written and almost poetry (teehee).''

you've got some ego problems of your own.

oh yeah, bub? i can point to some of your posts where thou dost egoth runneth over. the internet is the super ego anyways. you can run rampant on the 'net without fear of repercussion.

i'm bored.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie- read J17. It does everything the NME does, and it works out cheaper for the month. Plus, no articles by cunting Steven "Cunt" Wells, the cunt.

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''i'm just mindful of ego. i did a beachwood sparks review that was beautiful written and almost poetry (teehee).''

you've got some ego problems of your own.

anyways i am a good writer. that's just a fact. however, if i were full of ego why would i rip into some beautiful and make is grey and concrete like a david cronenberg parking lot (which admittedly is more beautiful sometimes like the archway tower). : - o

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''And why would I spent £3.50 to £5.00 just to find out what new music is out this month? Convince me of that.''

The wire it 3.30 and it's once a month. The nme is 1.50 and it's four times a month. there's a lot of 'stuff' being released so I can't just glance and say i want that and that, etc. anyway, as I said I liked some of the articles, just not this month.

''i'm eighteen to twenty''

heh...so you're 19 then.

''want to find out what new music sounds like - do I spend rather alot of money or do I spend £1.50 and maybe a coke and a Heat Magazine for the price of one magazine that is just boffin wank material?''

well, I don't like everything (every one has its likes and hates). One thing that I hate is the brand of indie that NME 'covers' week in week out. Rather have boffin wank material than just wank material.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie = every drama student ever combined into one person.

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie- read J17. It does everything the NME does, and it works out cheaper for the month. Plus, no articles by cunting Steven "Cunt" Wells, the cunt.

Never heard of it. I would read the billboards in los angeles than hunt down a magazine (wait I lied Flux is a good magazine and i have to go to charing cross to buy it).

i'm off to bed.

night night

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie = every drama student ever combined into one person.

that's the coolest compliment ever. i am a drama queen. but not in my writing i.e. with characters and such. sometimes i think that life is a big needle and it's fucking me up throughout the day.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

The wire it 3.30 and it's once a month. The nme is 1.50 and it's four times a month. there's a lot of 'stuff' being released so I can't just glance and say i want that and that, etc. anyway, as I said I liked some of the articles, just not this month.

it's very much a 'I want this and I want that' culture. Sometimes I wish I could do all of my shopping at argos. It would make life less complicated.

''i'm eighteen to twenty''

heh...so you're 19 then.

hehehe.

''want to find out what new music sounds like - do I spend rather alot of money or do I spend £1.50 and maybe a coke and a Heat Magazine for the price of one magazine that is just boffin wank material?''

well, I don't like everything (every one has its likes and hates). One thing that I hate is the brand of indie that NME 'covers' week in week out. Rather have boffin wank material than just wank material.

what do you mean by brand of indie. this week's issue is cool - interpol/the pattern/the beachwood sparks/datsun. i hate the word indie. i like independant.

but the wire is tedious wank material. it's like jerking off to kafka when you could just easily masturbate to henry miller. or one step again - linda lovelace (for kerrang readers only)

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I've just recieved The Legend! Everett True Connection CD in the Mail. I'll be writing a review of it as soon as possible, as it features tasmanian guitar 'legend' Julian Teakle( he of The Frsutrations) playing on it. Which of the above should i submit my review to, besides the local rag i write for anyway? I want to play with all you grown ups and I sense this to be my make or break opportunity.

Andrew, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

don't ask me, i just occassionally sweep around nme's email system. me have no power. me just like free cds.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the only other magazine i would try to write for (hehe) would be that manchester magazine - FLUX.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''oh yeah, bub? i can point to some of your posts where thou dost egoth runneth over. the internet is the super ego anyways. you can run rampant on the 'net without fear of repercussion.''

it was you that started on the ego thing.

''define pop culture. i think mcdonalds is pop culture. more so than a tate exhibition about it.''

my point was that the NME is stuck down the 'we hate pop' road, etc. And it's coverage is really tired.

but I prefer the wire because the bands they cover are simply better in my opinion. And it just isn't restricted by 'indie' and what the major labels are offering this week. at least the ppl in the wire seemed to dig deeper.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''define pop culture. i think mcdonalds is pop culture. more so than a tate exhibition about it.''

my point was that the NME is stuck down the 'we hate pop' road, etc. And it's coverage is really tired.

that's not pop culture not least we are in some bizarro world where it has a different meaning. everything boring is pop culture.

but I prefer the wire because the bands they cover are simply better in my opinion. And it just isn't restricted by 'indie' and what the major labels are offering this week. at least the ppl in the wire seemed to dig deeper.

dig deeper or become masturbatory obscurists. 'look at me, look at me, i have a recording of the noises that john cale's fridge makes' - five stars obviously. whose really reading it anyways? hell to me would be paved with back issues of the wire or being stuck with the editorial and writers in an elevator.

but that's just me.

doomie, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''dig deeper or become masturbatory obscurists. 'look at me, look at me, i have a recording of the noises that john cale's fridge makes' - five stars obviously. whose really reading it anyways? hell to me would be paved with back issues of the wire or being stuck with the editorial and writers in an elevator.''

the NME type 'indie' is already being obscurist. Mention beachwood sparks or interpol and you'll get a blank look. having read the NME for a few years they got as obscure as the wire (it's just the labels that release it are different). the john cale stuff is far easier to get hold of as well but have you heard it doomie or is this another ill informed opinion of yours.

I don't write lists and so on. if I'm passing through a shop and I happen to see something I might try it. Nobody can get hold of everything. a lot of the wire's stuff is available in a record shop, you can easily mail order it too.

Julio Desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

anyway, must go to bed (and I am going). see you doomie. I'll look at the NME to see if there is a beechwood sparks review this week.

Julio desouza, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie

what's so good about Flux magazine?

sonicred, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie speaks the troof! rescue the middlebrow! don't just write about music, FITE about it!

Sterling Clover, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck off doomie you pretentious cunt.

BORED, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that Doomie could possibly be Arthur Ghost. Arthur Ghost must be given coins. Give coins to Doomie.

Lynskey, Wednesday, 14 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck off doomie you pretentious cunt

hahahah....at least I don't read the wire which is the pretentious cunt magazine of choice.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you seriously trying to say, for example, the NME's first look at "Without Me", or April Long's two page arselick of Craig Nicholl's weren't pretentious? The NME is just as pretentious as Wire, except it's pretentious about the non-pretentious. If that make sense.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie old son, check the Arthur Lee interview in this month's Wire! it goes places none of the other recent press has; e.g. asking Arthur in what ways he was writing about death in FC.

whatever NME says about Beachwood Sparks, it is still mostly plugging Starsailor, and Starsailor are the Cliff Richard of our times. I mean, Tim Buckley couldn't help sounding like Roger Ramjet, but this guy actually tries to!

CTCL is good, but I wish to God they'd hang fire on their CRAZY rock'n'roll quotes, you leaf through and there's endless "I pissed in a milkbottle, added a frog and poured it over my salad"'s everywhere.

pulpo, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

For the casual rock and roll reader - Kerrang and NME are rated. For the Boffin - you go elsewhere - though I am an obsessed rock and roll fanatic and I would not pay more than £2.00 for a mag - though when I do - I pay Uncut - because of the free cds. One must not forget the glory of the free cds.

am not an authority though.

I usually just read my articles and go wow...cool.

i'm interested in the lee interview but i've always steered clear of wire as it always bored me.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

again, can I stress I'm only in it for the free stuff - shows and cds. i got the paperchase and james yorkston and the atheletes yesterday. pretty cool.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

You could try shoplifting you know.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

but the free gigs???

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't really read the music press to be honest. like doomie, i prefer reading books (i have a large backlog). i do buy the wire, and i agree with doomie that it is pretentious (although, i am pretentious too, so i don't mind) - but yes, i don't read much of it - just the things i am interested in

i do like long pieces on music though, but of course they must be interesting and exciting to read, this isn't often the case. i want to read things like Simon Reynolds Energy Flash, writing so evocative, you can really imagine yourself in those situations, get lost in the writing (of course it helped that i am fantastically excited by rave music)

i've never read CTCL. NME doesn't cover the music i like (actually neither does the CTCL or the wire, they are all essentially indie magazines i suppose)

who suggested doomie was 19?!?!?! at least 30, surely???

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

good morning everyone!

i suggested he was 19 (he said he was 'between 18-20'). He's 30 then is he? The wire is closer to what I like. The bands seem to be more anarchic even. Indeed, I only read things that I'm interested in. It is impossible for me to keep up unless I actually was paid to do that (somehow).

to the person who told doomie to fuck off...was it the same person who told me to fuck off on that Nick drake thread and ran away when I told he/she was a coward.

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't know age, i was just guessing from the posting style!

people telling people to fuckoff (esp anonymously)= DUD! i don't know who did that, i've never really enjoyed the aggressive macho stuff, something about it never appealed.

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

the oddest thing about this thread is the people trying to guess my age without having met me. i am between 19 and 100. both of you are wrong.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

gareth - what are you opinions on gary usher and martin denny?

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm, what about julio? i've never met him, i'm guessing...23? i must admit, i'm surprised i got you wrong doomie, i had you for in your 30s

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

gary usher. i'm afraid he is only a name to me. i know who he is, but haven't heard him

martin denny. i like what i've heard, and his albums are fairly easy to pick up for 50p-£1 in charity shops. the only problem is the sheer size of his discography, i've know idea which are the best ones. i did go through a martin denny-arthur lyman type phase a few years ago, (i love music where birds go wu-wu-wu-waaa-waaa-WAH-WA-WA-AAAAA- AAOOOO-wu-wu)

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Martin Denny discography with gradings

michael, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

why are you asking about Martin Denny anyway, DP?

michael, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

as for the arthur lee interview in the wire doomie, you should definitely try and get hold of that. its quite a strange interview. i've read interviews with him before, and they're, you know, fine. this ones odd though, i cant tell if hes being disingeneous or not. i'm not really sure what to make of it!

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm just going through a martin denny phase again. sparked off by the fact that joe foster is restarting revola - where i first discovered martin denny. i've got around thirty l.p.s but they are at my friend's flat in Canada. I got the Breakfast of Champions soundtrack last week and have been dlownloading like mad.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

martin denny evokes a better lifestyle of 1950s hawaaian vacation and clean surburbs.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

that's very US-specific. the UK in the 50s wasn't so nice

michael, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

well i am north american.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

but micheal, i mean, the 50s in america weren't so nice for many people either. the idea of the kontiki life, the hawaii stuff, its all aspirationalist business isn't it? i think dennys stuff started to take off somewhere between 57-59? at this point we were beginning to get our own aspirationalism, but looking across the atlantic to young america and excitement. the music of denny, baxter, lyman etc were musics of aspirationalism to satisfaction/comfort/the good life, the sound of ageing america...

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry but it's jsut the 50s cinematic american dreaminess of it all.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i know. maybe i should make the point that the music doesn't evoke any specific time or place for me. interestingly, for Doomie it evokes the original audience of the music, whereas if it evoked anything for me it would more likely be the 'getting away from it all' idea, which, as you mentioned, was what it evoked for the original audience

michael, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

One of the nice things about the Arthur Lee Wire interview is that unlike EVERYONE else, they don't patronise him - they treat him as an intelligent man and ask him telling questions about his work, none of this sixty million times repeated "ooh arthur couldabeen jimi hendrix, did you hang your roadie then?" yeah, his answers are sometimes weird, but interesting to hear what he listens to these days, plus his opinions of Brian Wilson and Zappa. It's a healthy approach.

I don't always get the "post electro scatalogia suffused with swedenborgian metaphysics" stuff either, but that's just me. The Wire turned me onto some jazz and contemporary classical that I love.

As for Martin Denny, it evokes the nightmarish, tone-bending world of Elvis's Blue Hawaii film to me. Creepy listening!

Pulpo, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

was thinking about it over lunch: martin denny is clean music without pretending to have the weight of the world on it.

i wish it was a martin denny world. also lsitening to gary usher's symphonic tribute to the beach boys and the vines (still think they are garbage though)

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i know what you mean!

gareth, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I like CTCL, and buy it whenever I see a copy. the I R R&R stuff alluded to above can be quite irritating, yes, but I do still enjoy thee magazine. The Wire I buy when there's something interesting in it, the last one I bought, I got it b/c there was a big pheature on Shirley Collins, who is my Nr1 hero. It was a good interview, but it could have been a bit longer perhaps. NME I haven't bought for a good long while. I'd slag it off something rotten, but I don't want to be nasty to paul dp. I wish he wrote for a better publication, but you've got to take work where you can get it. His stated reasons are quite valid IMO. I think "Terrorizer" is the best musick magazine by a long way, tho' obviously its speciality might not be what yer into. Bla blah fucking blah. Guess what? I have 2 cheap Raleigh mountain bikes waiting in thee repair stand downstairs, and come 2pm, I have to go and fix0r them. whadda drag, coz I prefer fixing better quality stuff, like.

Norman Phay is having his dinner, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i have been too poor lately to afford any of them. but nme is probably not worth a plugged nickel. i sometimes look at my sister's copy and it just seems like blanket coverage of oasis/white stripes/strokes.

nicole, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I am only really familiar with the WIRE, though I've glanced at NME on occasion. The WIRE is at least somewhat eclectic. I find some of the articles much too pretentious (like those think pieces refelcting on 20th century figures/trends. I forget the name of that series). I just read the bits that interest me, too, at this point. But at least it gives me exposure to some new things now and then. Actually, I often find the advertisements useful as a way to keep track of new releases I might not otherwise hear or hear about. But obviously, its focus is quite a bit different from mine.

DeRayMi, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

In fact, if there's a Lou Harrison article, I guess I will have to go down to the Music Dept. and take a look at the latest WIRE (along with the new format for Songlines).

DeRayMi, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i like CTCL, though it's hard to find in spain (and i'm not subscribing to any mags anymore...). usually i get it when a friend goes to london. i can't seem to be able to enter the website, though. maybe my navigator's too old?

joan vich, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Weird Joan.

try www.carelesstalkcostslives.co.uk

Email me direct if you continue to have problems.

Jerry, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

if anything Wire's perceived dispassion is more down to the personal timidity of its writers than any sneery in-house elitism; i'm totally sure there are those on the staff that enjoy so-called popcult musics but feel bound to shed light (yes as in reveal to those that would like to learn more) on the esoteric side and let the readers decide for themselves otherwise. maybe mark s can set the record straight here either way. the wire (like any worthwhile magazine) is a collection of different writers each with different opinions of music; so for doomie to say that he only cares abt "uncluttered rock n' roll man!" is pathetic. what is this, le fucking mot juste? if you're drawing attention to something then you're accountable. there's no such thing as FACT here. it's just YOU; interpretation. anyone can read a mag, go into a shop, pick up some stuff have a collection- what it means to you is what counts. c'mon man, this is really basic stuff here.

also: like julio sez your idea of pop cult is bollox. not in a "define popcult" way but in the way you and writers of yr ilk ("freaks" as you call them so selflessly) hide your massive egos behind a popcult flotsam flux existentialism, creating this higher collective order that just seems to end up suppressing anything you don't like rather than open the whole thing up. so the wire is boring according to the great popcult whorl ie YOU. it's just so selfconscious, so mannered. SUPER egolitarianism (heh) rather than just, like, living. having an opinion - yeah that's ego too. but at least it's honest. far more corruptive to selfdeny ego and then masquerade it as general truth.

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ps gareth - telling someone to FUCK OFF is not machismo

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ps2 sterling: just call me Bob!

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ps3 OOOH OOOH guess my age!

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Holy shit! This is why I read WIRE. I just inadvertantly ID'd something I heard long ago on the radio, I think. "A rock and roll session is a session where we can do what we want to do." Nurse With Wound? Really? This gives it as a 1994 release, but surely I heard this in the 80's so either it was released earlier on vinyl or he's sampling somebody else. Of course, since I haven't heard it for a very long time, there's no telling what it will sound like now.

Okay, carry on. Sorry.

DeRayMi, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't understand a single word of that Bob, so I guess about 17, perhaps 19 and you're very proud you've just learnt some long words (in other trades they call it 'jargon' and realise they're only placed there to confuse those without the necessary training, to belittle and protect, to make safe their trade)...

jerry, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I see. It was probably Jac Berrocal that I heard. It pays to start reaidng the review at the beginning.

DeRayMi, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm actually 12. C'mon hold my hand, I'll walk you thru it. Which word didn't you get? Masquerade?

Y'know in the music rag biz jargon= being a wiseguy.

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, bob, i found it badly written boring intellectual machismo. I'll guess your age - 35 and have not had a fuck in awhile. Your writing is insufferably bad. Or insufferably public school.

but thanks for entertaining me.

see, this man don't give a fuck. i do it for the free cds. let me walk you through that, "Bob". i. (meaning me) do it (meaning write) for the cds (music on cdrs). Do you understand me?

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

also: like julio sez your idea of pop cult is bollox. not in a "define popcult" way but in the way you and writers of yr ilk ("freaks" as you call them so selflessly) hide your massive egos behind a popcult flotsam flux existentialism, creating this higher collective order that just seems to end up suppressing anything you don't like rather than open the whole thing up. so the wire is boring according to the great popcult whorl ie YOU. it's just so selfconscious, so mannered. SUPER egolitarianism (heh) rather than just, like, living. having an opinion - yeah that's ego too. but at least it's honest. far more corruptive to selfdeny ego and then masquerade it as general truth.

let's do this again, bob.

i. (come on say it with me) I do it for the free cds. Break that down with your thesaurus. Ten Dollar Words shows massive insecurity, man.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''Oh, I see. It was probably Jac Berrocal that I heard. It pays to start reaidng the review at the beginning.''

indeed deraymi. you want paralleles on algha marghen. Its a 'jazz' album. I gotta run, W. marsalis might be after me now I said that.

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

the fact is 'bob' ... come on ... mouth the words with me, come out of that shy corner with your thesaurus and badly written thesis topics. i do it for the free cds. it's easy bob.

*let's go of your hand and sets you free into the world*

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

well - if i'm being honest - i also do it for the free gigs. london is an expensive place bob. do you realise that journalism is now supporting my music buying habit. i do it for the free cds. again bob - come on little guy - it's easy - say the word again. doomie does it for the free cds. take taht agression out. don't want to scare off any more people with your faux intellectualism. doomie does it for the free cds.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

''hmm, what about julio? i've never met him, i'm guessing...23?''

true. just turned 23 a couple of weeks ago.

doomie's attitude sounds like he is 19. well...lets try and guess everyone's age. Bob? 20. Doomie? 17 surely Gareth? 120.

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

17 or 19, its all the bloody same.

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck magazines. Books and guessing ppl's age roolz!

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i never judge anyone on the 'net. it's the super ego run rampant - but 17 is cool. thanks, julio!

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

bob is a very lonely 20 year old than.

doomie, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

bob- we think the wire is a good mag but I think the idea of comparing the wire to NME/CTCL is wrong. their musical universe is completely different.

It depends on what music you enjoy listening to. That's all there is to it.

Julio Desouza, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

If you're gonna paint me into some overcooked bedroom intellectual corner it'd be nice to get some reasoning as to why I'm so faux, cos so far you haven't considered what I've said. I still can't see what's so tricksy about it really but I CAN see your angle for consolidating your popcool-alignment (hey dudes he's a dork!) so ah, I guess that's uh, cool. Proves me right in any case.

did you really think i was gonna try and prove my popularity/sex prowess on the INTERNET?

"bob- we think the wire is a good mag but I think the idea of comparing the wire to NME/CTCL is wrong. their musical universe is completely different. It depends on what music you enjoy listening to. That's all there is to it."

No. It's not about trying to convince them "my" music is better. In fact it's about showing how very little to do with music this is on their part. But I appreciate you pulling me away from the brickwall anyways. Whatever.

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"did you really think i was gonna try and prove my popularity/sex prowess on the INTERNET?"

(as much as i want to)

Bob Zemko, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

HELO I JUST JIONED TEH INTARWEB KAN U TELL ME WH3R3 TO FIND MP3Z W4R3Z AND PR0N?

31337, Thursday, 15 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

. In fact it's about showing how very little to do with music this is on their part. But I appreciate you pulling me away from the brickwall anyways. Whatever.

Read this slowly - this sentence makes absolutely no sense. 'with music this is on their part'.

O.k. 'Bob' again.....I. do. it. for. the. free. cds.

Geez D Howie Dee.

dooie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.norfolkwindmills.com/images/gwr.jpg

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

nice pic gareth.

here is another reason why i write for the nme. i'm seeing my favourite west coast band - the tyde - on monday and i'm doing a review and got some cds and passes into a sold out show.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

nice pic gareth.

I'm not sure why it's here, but I like it.

DeRayMi, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

here is another reason why i write for the nme

doomie, there's nothing wrong with writing for the nme, you seem somewhat defensive about it. the way i see it, if your writing is good then it being in the nme isn't going to change its quality is it?

if you were at sage francis, then you must have seen Ed & Suzy as well? Nick K? oh yea, beardy hindle was there, hahahahahah! anyway, did you like it, i thought it was terrible (theres a piece on my site about it, you may disagree, but i thought you may be interested in the opinion of someone else who was at the same show?)

on a different tack, i was at Random Number, I am Robot and Proud, and Printed Circuit last night, and that was great, not enough support of course, the megaguestlist of sage francis was not in evidence, in fact there wasn't one at all, a shame great music happens and people are not interested

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Sage Francis - I always give leeway to rap shows as they are notoriously un-entertaining.

I saw you at the show. Didnt really want to say hello as too many people - confusing - being a recluse - better.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

give us a link for your review. did you like the supreme vagabond craftsman? i went out and bought the cd the next day after.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i suppose i get defensive as people seem up against teh wall but i enjoy it - i write about a review a week - it gets me out and about in london and i get my music paid for.

i don't have the problem. other people do.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

www.norfolkwindmills.c om/new.htmlhere, its not a review as such, just some thoughts. everyone has since told me that i would have been better off going to the clouddead one instead because that might be more 'my thing', but i was otherwise engaged that night. i liked doseones contrib to the hood album so...

why are all EC2/E1 gigs so fucking hot?????

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't have the problem. other people do

what a great title for an emo album!

writing is good, where it appears doens't matter

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

damn, you'll have to scroll down a bit on that link. theres some other stuff above it

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i'll check it out this weekend - at work now - far too brief to look adn read and digest. dunno why it's so hot - was hanging otu with jeffrey lewis at the beachwood spark sshow and he was saying the sweat was stinging his eyes on stage.

is 93 feet east cool venue?

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

actually - there is one editor at the nme who knows what is going on and I dig his work. i think the mega gueset list was because of the anti con collective thing being the hippest thing in london that week.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

telling someone to FUCK OFF is not machismo
Its rockist.
bringing nothing to this thread gettting nothing from it, other then CTCL has supposed good paper quality, I'll see if it holds up to the bounty taste.

WTF is in my coffee.

Mr Noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Arses, I knew I should have gone last night but I was absolutely exhausted so spent the night reading/scoffing giant amounts of pasta and homemade pesto instead.

When Careless Trout Costs Lives launches, it will blow every other rag out of the water. TROUT, WATER, DO YOU SEE?

Sarah, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

You can get a copy by writing to me. It will cost you one sea bass.

Sarah, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

What if you only have a sunfish? Something seems fishy about this method of payment.

Nicole, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

HEY!!!? Why am I gettin' mentioned, doomie? Leave, me, out, this. Please. Until I get my own home in order, then I'll wade in (but explain what "Gee Dee Howie Dee" means in the meantime, please.)

david h, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey Doomie.

If all NME writers have as little self-respect as you, it probably goes some way to explaining why the magazine is so bad... ah fuck, does that mean they're gonna spike my Reading story now? No. Didn't mean it. It's a joke. You NME types know when to recognise a joke when you see one, don't you? Still, it does seem weird, your defensiveness. Once upon a time, people would have been proud to write for the NME - not "I do it for the free CDs and guest list". Man, oh man. What a fucking lame reason. I'm guessing you're about 24 and feel you know everything there is to about life. Man, oh man. That's a real shame. "I do it for the free CDs and guest-list". Man, oh man. What a pitiful existence.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Blimey it's Doomie vs ET - the long-anticipated cosmic battle which foretells the end of ILM! (and bang on time too).

Tom, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Everett - I only have three words to share with you.

Fat. Fourty. Bitter.

You are unimportant and you are the reason i have the attitude I do.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and something else, "Doomie".

I'm not surprised you post anonymously. If I was your editor and read your posts, I'd sack you on the fucking spot. And If I find out any of the Careless Talk writers have the same attitude then they're fucking sacked too. Unless of course I change my mind...

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Mmmm!!! Bitter!!! Sign me up for a pint.

I think I should write for Careless Talk Costs Lives - I haf just written a GREBT review of Pokémon Snap!

Sarah, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Nicole, cos it's you, I'll accept a salmon fillet. I should eat more oily fish they are the alpha and omega oil of health or something and we cd all do with more health.

Sarah, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Fit, Forty and I drink Bitter.

Dr.C, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

And please don't write in riddles...

"You are unimportant and you are the reason i have the attitude I do." It doesn't even make sense. If I'm unimportant I have no bearing on your attitude whatsoever.

What's up being anonymous, huh? Too little self-respect to use your own name? Man, fucking stay away from being a music critic if you don't consider what you do to be important or an art - no wonder the reams of press we read are so grey and dull and lifeless. Congratulations doomie, congratulations on contributing to life's general mediocrity. You must feel very proud of yourself when you wake in the morning. "I'm an NME writer! I get free CDs and I can get in free to concerts!" Whoa! You really have reached life's pinnacle there.

You know, if you have no pride in what you do then stay the FUCK AWAY from my art. I'm fed up with apologising on behalf of people like you, trying to explain 'we're not all like that' when of course I know that most of us are.

Think of taking a career change Doomie. One where you're not ashamed to use your real name. One where you actually feel good about what you do.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I love writing for the NME. I would do anything for that magazine. I am guarded on this board for obvious reasons. But I love rock and roll. I love writing. I am just not holier than thou like you.

I know about you.

Leave me alone. You are sad.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie vs. Jerry.

This is something I might ACTUALLY stop downloading Andrew Scott porn for and watch...

kate, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

isnt going to happen.

i would like to say that i'm always suggesting ideas for bands and music to improve - my goal is simplier - i want to show kids that there is an alternative to nu-metal.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

YEAH! SPORTS METAL!!! Cheers Doomie!

the kids, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

and if your art is that your bitterness has not led you to suicude - than bravo.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Aw, g'wan. You're ruining my fun.

UUUUHHHHHHH half naked Andrew Scott in plastic trousers, COME TO KATE, NOW!!!

How's the book, coming, Doomie? No, this is a serious question, I'm not taking the piss.

kate, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Leave me alone. You are sad.

Hm.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

There's a new editor at the NME: Conor McNicholas, How's Doomie getting on with him?

And What "are the Two Momentous Announcements from the makers of NME" trailed for next week.

DJ Martian, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

They're merging with CTCL and The Wire. "Great news for all our readers!"

Tom, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess its either they are buying a football club or they've been bought out by Spin.

I kinda like the football idea, cross promotion up the wazoo. Im sickening even myself, still woulnd't put it past them.

Mr noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll just sit back now, I'm just along for the ride.

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

new answers!

lawrence kansas, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

did i ever tell you the one about the socially-retarded NME features editor who threatened me with a punch in the mouth last autumn, after i pointed out the compelling reasons we shoulda give a certain Surrey- based hardcore band a one-page feature in the paper, CC-ing his superiors who subsequently approved the feature after he'd been giving me the runaround for weeks? (the band were soon after on the cover of the rag; i, however, had already jumped ship to Kerrang!, where you're allowed to be skeptical about The Vines, and also sell more than 70,000 copies a week)...

...i have many such stories. unbelievably, some are even duller than this!

stevie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

www.rockandrollbadboy.com

found everett's home page!!

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Then lets get out the juice and gin and enjoy it to its fullest.

Mr noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

stevie chick has moved to kerrang...jeez, that takes me back to my 'younger' days.

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

noodles- I'm off to get spaghetti. juice and gin is good too in this nice and will go down well in this hot august afternoon.

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i want to show kids that there is an alternative to nu-metal.

J34H!@# FUKC!|\|G PR0G R0X0R!@#!@# BR!|\|G !T 0|\|!@#!@#!@#

Norman Phay, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i love it there, julio... everything the NME is not. in fact, it makes me feel like i wasted the three years i spent at that anorexic rag...

stevie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

nice to know you're happy there stevie.

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

wouldn't say you wasted your time at NME. I enjoyed your writing. enthusiastic but not enthusiastic about every damn thing as I recall (but it must be 2 years since i last bought an issue of any weekly music mag).

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey Doomie. If all NME writers have as little self-respect as you, it probably goes some way to explaining why the magazine is so bad... ah fuck, does that mean they're gonna spike my Reading story now? No. Didn't mean it. It's a joke. You NME types know when to recognise a joke when you see one, don't you? Still, it does seem weird, your defensiveness. Once upon a time, people would have been proud to write for the NME - not "I do it for the free CDs and guest list".

Well, ‘Everett’, ‘Jerry’, ‘Legend’ … I am new to the game and have not spent a lot of years doing journalism. But let’s break this down.

1. I enjoy the free CDs - only when the music is something so beautiful and unknown I have to write about it. Three of my articles were cut down or not used because they were not requested. Did I consider that a waste of time? No. I felt - as I do about writing - but differently - journalism for me is me being a conduit for something beautiful that I am listening to. If I can share that feeling - and inspire somebody to buy that particular piece of music than I have done my job.

2. Sometimes, ‘Jerry’ or can I call you the ‘Legend’ or maybe just Evie…being on the guest list is not a good thing. But it's like when I go to a friend's art show or reading, it's a happening, and it makes me feel that life is beautiful when I leave.

Man, oh man. What a fucking lame reason. I'm guessing you're about 24 and feel you know everything there is to about life.

I’ve lived a good life - pain, death, joy and sorrow - not a secluded life of rock and roll and music industry. But do I know everything there is to know about life? Hardly. That’s the exciting thing about it.

Man, oh man. That's a real shame. "I do it for the free CDs and guest-list". Man, oh man. What a pitiful existence.

You funnily enough picked up on that - did you not? I just broke it down - this is what a journalist does and gets. He/She gets paid, gets free cds and gets on the guest lists. For a rock and roll freak like me, this is heaven. Maybe you are too jaded - afterall that is what my music writing is there for - to serve SOMEBODY ELSE’S art. That’s the crux is it not? The only art I can see is the art of inspiration. You, Evie, seem to think that you are art. That is wrong. You may have been a hero at one point for others but your time is up but you won’t leave the party, will you?

Oh, and something else, "Doomie".

Yes….’Jerry’, ‘Everett’ ‘Legend’.

I'm not surprised you post anonymously. If I was your editor and read your posts, I'd sack you on the fucking spot.

No offence, Evie but there is no way that I would work for your magazine. It’s dull and pointless and badly written. I’m sorry. That is how I honestly feel about it - never mind the price.

And If I find out any of the Careless Talk writers have the same attitude then they're fucking sacked too. Unless of course I change my mind...

Oh you are such a powerful man. Eek!

And please don't write in riddles...

Would it be untoward to say, please don’t write at all, Everett? That was bitchy for me to say - but you have been bitchy. To be honest Everett, I have read a handful of your articles and it always goes back to you. Which bores me. You are not the art. You review the art.

"You are unimportant and you are the reason i have the attitude I do." It doesn't even make sense. If I'm unimportant I have no bearing on your attitude whatsoever.

Your unimportance is so powerful that it has an affect on my life. When I see you - you are a guide on how I don’t want to end up. The music industry can change you if you will let it. I like to keep it pure - the music and me. Or as honest as I can be. I have good friends that keep me grounded. I am learning to be the best writer that I can possibly be.

What's up being anonymous, huh? Too little self-respect to use your own name? Man, fucking stay away from being a music critic if you don't consider what you do to be important or an art - no wonder the reams of press we read are so grey and dull and lifeless.

O.k., ‘Everett’, ‘Legend’, ‘Jerry’.

Congratulations doomie, congratulations on contributing to life's general mediocrity. You must feel very proud of yourself when you wake in the morning. "I'm an NME writer! I get free CDs and I can get in free to concerts!" Whoa! You really have reached life's pinnacle there.

It upsets you that I have broken down the essentials of music criticism. Tell me how would you be a music journalist without free cds and guest lists, Jerry?

You know, if you have no pride in what you do then stay the FUCK AWAY from my art.

I thought Lester Bangs invented it and you are a weak imitation. Why have the Pepsi when you can have the double vodka?

I'm fed up with apologising on behalf of people like you, trying to explain 'we're not all like that' when of course I know that most of us are.

Most publicists like me because I am very very euthanstic about new music and spent time campaigning to get bandsd in the press when I know for a fact I would not be doing the review.

Think of taking a career change Doomie. One where you're not ashamed to use your real name. One where you actually feel good about what you do.

You don’t know me. And I do feel good about what I do. Music Journalism is one facet. I’m young, dumb and full of words - to quote my agent. I write books, ghost write short stories and screen plays, write short stories, music journalism - I don’t need a prat like you to tell what makes me feel good. And guess what? I temp as well and try to have a loving relationship with my girl. I don’t really have time for negativity or you. I’m too busy doing what I love. And I will be successful and the funny thing is that you will never know my name. Which is good.

I love writing. I love rock and roll.

Tell me where I am going wrong oh god of rock journalism - ‘cept wasting time on this board - which I will stop today.

See, writing, to me is so beautiful that negative creeps like you will never kill it. I will always have that talent, regardless.

Bye.

Dooomie.

Sorry for being harsh but I'm just being honest. Or basically how I think I should be. I think everyone clouds the issue - it's the artist that is important not the journalist. And I think that's where alot of people fuck up.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Doomie, Doomie.

We are sad, aren't we?

"I love writing for the NME. I would do anything for that magazine. I am guarded on this board for obvious reasons. But I love rock and roll. I love writing. I am just not holier than thou like you."

Who's the fucking self-important twat now? What? YOU'RE GUARDED ON THIS BOARD FOR WHAT OBVIOUS REASONS? Like we fucking care whether you're some self-preening little twat with his name on the Tyde guest list and his bundle of free Beachwood Sparks CDs. Hey Doomie. Are you really, really famous then? Do you have stalkers? Kids clamouring in the street for your autograph because you once had your name printed in a national publication? Is that why you're guarding your identity? OR ARE YOU JUST A FUCKING COWARD WHO CAN DISH OUT CRITICISM BUT CAN'T TAKE IT LIKE ALMOST ALL OF YOUR BREED? Let me clue you into something. I couldn't give two hoots who or what you are: if you write for the NME, I sure as hell won't recognise your name. Like most of this country.

Please. You love writing. You love rock and roll. You love writing. Right. Hence the statement: "I am only in this for the free CDs and the guestlist." Oh...you want to take it back now? It was irony. Well, slap me down and call me a fuckhead! It was a joke. That's why you had to repeat it 10 times - yes 10 times - on this thread, while trying to bully another poster. Jeez. I can understand why IPC only pays its writers 9p a word...9p too much, I'd say. Or is the low payrate why you have to keep repeating yourself?

(The line "fat, 40 and bitter" - stand aside, Paul Merton and let Doomie take the floor... I bow to your biting wit, my man. I am suitably crushed. I am actually 41, and prefer the adjective 'corpulent'. Bitter? At least I'm not jaded at 21... and if you're any older you should be damn well ashamed of yourself.)

So you wake in the morning and think "Doomie, I'm a damn fine writer and I love rock and roll", do you? I'm happy for you. Very happy. Pur another dime in the jukebox, baby.

Everett motherfucking True and proud of it, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn! That should've read 'put' another dime...

I really should take my time over these things.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Doomie, Doomie. We are sad, aren't we? Nope. I’m pretty happy with life.

"I love writing for the NME. I would do anything for that magazine. I am guarded on this board for obvious reasons. But I love rock and roll. I love writing. I am just not holier than thou like you." Who's the fucking self-important twat now? What? Nope, not me, that was written in a haste response to your bitch about me. YOU'RE GUARDED ON THIS BOARD FOR WHAT OBVIOUS REASONS? Nope cause a lot of people on this board don’t like me. Like we fucking care whether you're some self-preening little twat with his name on the Tyde guest list and his bundle of free Beachwood Sparks CDs. I never actually talk to anyone in the music industry Everett - I don’t give out my phone number, I just like the music and me, cause it’s beautiful. But see the Nope above for my reasons. Hey Doomie. Are you really, really famous then? Do you have stalkers? Kids clamouring in the street for your autograph because you once had your name printed in a national publication? Is that why you're guarding your identity?

Nope because a lot of people on this board don’t like me. Which is cool.

OR ARE YOU JUST A FUCKING COWARD WHO CAN DISH OUT CRITICISM BUT CAN'T TAKE IT LIKE ALMOST ALL OF YOUR BREED?

Nope because a lot of people on this board don’t like me. This was before the NME.

Let me clue you into something. I couldn't give two hoots who or what you are: if you write for the NME, I sure as hell won't recognise your name. Like most of this country.

Nope because a lot of people on this board don’t like me. This was way before the NME. Please. You love writing. You love rock and roll. You love writing. Right. Hence the statement: "I am only in this for the free CDs and the guestlist." Oh...you want to take it back now?

Nope. I love music. I love shows. I love live music. So nope.

It was irony. Well, slap me down and call me a fuckhead!

Nope. I don’t think you are a fuckhead. Just delusional to your status.

It was a joke. That's why you had to repeat it 10 times - yes 10 times - on this thread, while trying to bully another poster.

Nope. Sorry if the other poster felt like I was bullying. I just am shy about it. ‘Cause I’m learning. It’s the lapsed Catholic in me. And I thought I was having a good conversation with Gareth before you burst in.

Jeez. I can understand why IPC only pays its writers 9p a word...9p too much, I'd say. Or is the low payrate why you have to keep repeating yourself?

Nope. It’s higher than that. (The line "fat, 40 and bitter" - stand aside, Paul Merton and let Doomie take the floor... I bow to your biting wit, my man. I am suitably crushed. I am actually 41, and prefer the adjective 'corpulent'. Bitter)

And you spend your time on an internet board trying to crush the enthusiam of a young journalist? Sad.

? At least I'm not jaded at 21... and if you're any older you should be damn well ashamed of yourself.)

I love my life. I’m hardly jaded. I’m beginning to think there is a miscommunication here. OH well.

So you wake in the morning and think "Doomie, I'm a damn fine writer and I love rock and roll", do you? I'm happy for you. Very happy. Pur another dime in the jukebox, baby.

Nope. I think, damn I love my girl and am a lucky fellow to have her.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ps. Gareth - liked your sage francis piece. It was critical - but it was good. ps. sorry for the sloppy formatting above.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry. Posted that before I saw Doomie's screed.

So Doomie now turns out to be a slightly matryed, self-righteous NME hack who is so scared of other people he won't even reveal his own name.

Sweet.

Self-righteous? NME? You don't have the fucking right my son... Since when is a self-confessed hack who is only in it for the guestlist and CDs got any right to be self-righteous? (Doomie, please don't assume that everyone writes about music for the same reasons. Would you do it if it weren't for the free CDs and guestlist? Would you do it if you weren't being paid? Well, would you?)

So, you're *helping" new bands, are you? Have you picked up a copy of the magazine you write for recently, Doomie? Or is it you I have to thank personally for the pre-eminence of the Vines and the Strokes? Gee thanks, Doomie. You are so forward-thinking.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and you are so wrong...

"...that is what my music writing is there for - to serve SOMEBODY ELSE’S art."

Man, you are so fucking wrong. Get out of this fucking art form Doomie, before you ruin it for others. Please. I'm begging you. I'm down on my bended knee. You don't understand even Rule Number One, do you?

Maybe that's why your music writing is there...and that WOULD explain a few things, wouldn't it?

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Nope because a lot of people on this board don’t like me.

Wonder why.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry. Posted that before I saw Doomie's screed. So Doomie now turns out to be a slightly matryed, self-righteous NME hack who is so scared of other people he won't even reveal his own name.

Hardly. I am the guy that write some live reviews. And people and not revealing my name - it’s down to this, I was a jerk on this board, I apologised, but people don’t like me which is understandably because of it. I’ve tried to help where I could - with Marcello and such. The only time that I felt slightly martryed was when my dad blew his head off with a shotgun or my mother died before I was twenty. I’m just happy to be alive and want to be alive and enjoy my life.

Sweet.

Self-righteous? NME? You don't have the fucking right my son...

You placed that accusation on me.

Since when is a self-confessed hack

Never said that.

who is only in it for the guestlist and CDs got any right to be self- righteous?

Maybe you should reread the post above. I’m more aware and very thankful for the publicists involved.

(Doomie, please don't assume that everyone writes about music for the same reasons. Would you do it if it weren't for the free CDs and guestlist? Would you do it if you weren't being paid? Well, would you?)

Actually - I would be alright - I have my other writing and my temp job and yes I have contributed articles without payment loads of times to various web ‘zines.

So, you're *helping" new bands, are you? Have you picked up a copy of the magazine you write for recently, Doomie? Or is it you I have to thank personally for the pre-eminence of the Vines and the Strokes? Gee thanks, Doomie. You are so forward-thinking.

Nah. The bands that I throw out into the nme were , Homelife, Kinski, Screaming Seagull, The Warlocks, Speedy J.

Don’t really like the Vines much. They have nothing special and the Strokes, I dig the Strokes, but this is all very last year.

The cool things that the NME have opened u p my eyes and ears to is Southern Records/Anti-Con Collective/Racebannon/Mum and Dad.

This is getting sort of dull, Everett, can we drop it here?

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

And I still say you're a coward for hiding behind a troll name...

Back when I was better known, we would invariably print threats both verbal and physical made against me by readers and musicians - we used to run a book of 20 Internationally Known Bands Who've Said They Will Punch Everett True out in print. In the flesh I had rock stars come looking for me with bodyguards, glasses held to my throat, pushed down flights of stairs...

And you're scared of a handful of ILM posters, almost all of whom are certainly the meekest people you could meet? I'll say it again: Doomie, YOU'RE A FUCKING COWARD.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

But again, I didn't read your previous screed.

I agree. Let's drop it. I can't help thinking that if I ever met you in the flesh we'd probably get on just fine.

Jerry, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ET, Doompatrol is an emotional masochist who will only come level with anyone when he is shouted at a lot because he 'suddenly' realizes to his 'surprise' that he's gone too far -- again. It's his constant strategy. Then he'll either claim he's been misquoted, misunderstood or somehow paint himself as an innocent. This has been going on on these boards for over a year now and it won't stop, even when Doompatrol claims to have done with us, only to return because, as mentioned, he's an emotional masochist. Let him alone and ignore him, you're only giving him what he wants, and he's deluding himself he's happy otherwise...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

And I still say you're a coward for hiding behind a troll name...

I like the name! and it was shortened from doom patrol which was my favourite sixties coic.

Back when I was better known, we would invariably print threats both verbal and physical made against me by readers and musicians - we used to run a book of 20 Internationally Known Bands Who've Said They Will Punch Everett True out in print. In the flesh I had rock stars come looking for me with bodyguards, glasses held to my throat, pushed down flights of stairs...

that doesnt impress me, Everett. I grew up in the toughest project. Went to a private school on a scholarship. When my dad killed himself I was bullied up 'til I fucked out of that town.

But this is getting silly. I don't give a rat's arse about some Visage singer who hated you. And you're scared of a handful of ILM posters,

Embarrassed, more like and very very shy. Though I did meet Mark S for coffee and it was pleasurable but then heard that he had said a bunch of nasty shit about me. I'm just reclusive. I find more than my five friends to be confusing. I've got five people who I would entrust my life with. Why would I want more?

I'm happy.

almost all of whom are certainly the meekest people you could meet? I'll say it again: Doomie, YOU'RE A FUCKING COWARD.

So. I've been called worse.

Bye.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

But again, I didn't read your previous screed. I agree. Let's drop it. I can't help thinking that if I ever met you in the flesh we'd probably get on just fine.

yeah. I'm beginning to like you too Everett. Sorry for being bitchy. I didnt mean half the things I said. My hands type faster than I think about the consequences.

ps. Ned - if that was the case - i would be on these boards more often, would I not?

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

You always come back -- and you don't have to post to still be here.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

You always come back -- and you don't have to post to still be here.

Too busy Ned.

Sorry.

Don't even care that you guys are moving to a new address.

Everett - I have to say this about you - you are the fourth person in the music industry who is crazy enough not to give a shit about the consequences.

I hope you have a second coming.

t.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Don't even care that you guys are moving to a new address.

You will, you will...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

you wish.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Not so.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

than why break your number one rule ned and pay me attention.

ps. everett - i have two forms of music writing - lyrical and loving and straight forward. i was in pain over having to ditch the lyricalness but and yes - i maybe be fucking up an art form - but i'm learning.

but i'm done - this was surreal madness and a good way to end my association with this board.

see you everett and hope you have a good one.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.norfolkwindmills.com/images/rockaway2.jpg

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

wow, that was random and welcomed.

mr noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Did Jerry Thackray really say: "too little self-respect to use your own name?" Teehee. Why you say "Gee Dee Howie Dee", doomie?

david h(owie), Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I am being utterly serious: this is the best thread ever. If you are curious enough to ask, on IM or my student webmail address then I will tell you exactly why. Thank you Everett. Thank you doomie.

david h(owie), Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Eh. Doomie, this dad-shotgun palaver:

doomie: hard time. found out my dad was dying this week. [insert some terminal disease here]
david h: [insert rough or suchlike]
doomie: s'ok, will make good material for second novel.

So, err, what is True? No' pickin' a figh' like.

david h(owie), Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

This is better than Indie Guilt C/D? It just needs some more random pictures, and it would overtake Steptoe and Son as the greatest thing ever.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

step dad - and thanks for not repeating private things about me on this forum.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

htttp://www.thepeterparkers.com/e_e.jpg
They're gonna kill me for that.

mr noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

woops, extra t.
http://www.thepeterparkers.com/SmashedMicStand.jpg

mr noodles, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

so, lisa, has this helped you decide which magazine you're going to subscribe to?

gareth, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie: a word to the wise. after two well-placed google queries i was reading your NME stuff, complete with bylines. if you're truly not revealing your name because you're scared of the repercussions of your words, it might be a good idea to choose them more wisely from here on in.

et: as a music journalist, i largely side with you. hell, i have to - i'd like to think i'm in my vocation for more than just the Free Stuff. but, to continue to rub knobs with the admittedly bewildering doomie in this silly (albeit hugely entertaining) pissing match - doesn't it degrade your point, even ever so slightly?

i'd love to hear wot mark s thinks about this, esp. the above regarding zee wire.

oh, while i'm here. i know you dropped out of this long ago, julio, but isn't it silly for you to deride the NME on the basis that they're stuck down the "we hate pop" road? i can't remember the last pop rekkid you didn't slag mercilessly. not trying to start something, just curious...

as you were!

mark p, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry - in retrospect, that bit to julio still sounded antagonistic. i only asked because i'm curious if you've got some nasty pop streak in you that is hitherto unknown abt

Mark, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie: a word to the wise. after two well-placed google queries i was reading your NME stuff, complete with bylines. if you're truly not revealing your name because you're scared of the repercussions of your words, it might be a good idea to choose them more wisely from here on in.

Nope. Not scared as I did not say anything inflammatory 'cept against everett true/jerry thackeray/etc. And why should I be scared? Is the music industry full of scared people already? 'Sides that's not my name. And you did not read the full argument did you? Oh well. Did not expect anyone to. Just pointlessly side with Everett even though we both came to some sort of conclusion.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

must... not... be... drawn... in...

anyone remember mastermind then?

mark p, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

however when rereading this - thread - however bewildering, scream of consciousness and freaky it may be - it is, very very entertaining.

now, is that not a good job for jerry and i? we've entertained.

hooray!

back to work.

though the thread is good reading!

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha.

you know you want to be drawn in.

come on ... slowly now.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Come into the lair.....of bewildering logic.

But firstly, Lisa, have you decided on what magazine you wanted to buy?

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Only personnel-private thing I have said about you on this forum was a compliment: I liked yr Sage Francis review.

david h(owie), Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeh and the dad thing. Ooops sorry. Well, I grazed a nick in your persona. People have to have corners to nibble. But I am sorry.

david h(owie), Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i have no persona - what this was - was an argument really between myself - jerry representing the idealistic paul and my idealistic vision of what it should be like and what things i don't like about it - the confused and bewildered paul very freudian. i thanked jerry via email.

but oh well. it was entertaining nonetheless! hahahaha....and a good blow out to my time spent with the greenspun crew.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

an unconscious/conscious sabatoge effort.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

and thanks for the compliment david - the funny thing is that i spend at least four to five hours on my reviews. including the show, time spent listening to the cd, to come up with some words to describe beauty. it's the most challenging writing there is. i do have respect for journalists that do it well.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

so i spend about 7 to 8 hours writing the review.....heh. that's a long tme.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought my original question was forgotten about.

so, lisa, has this helped you decide which magazine you're going to subscribe to?

Well its between The Wire and CTCL. It won't be NME. Is it worth emailing The Wire to see if anyone will fight Doomie and Everett?

Lisa, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

NME appears to be written by careerists who are only biding their time before going to Q,The Guardian or wherever all those old journos went. Always was sure they were never in it for the music. NME hasnt changed one bit has it? At least The Wire and CTCL writers appear to love music and the bands they cover. Not forced upon them by the owners of IPC... And im sick of reading about Sugababes,Atomic Kitten (insert any pop act covered better in smash hits) Sooner NME goes bust the better. The renovated disaster that was MM in its final year was still better.

Lisa, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

my GOD why did I choose to listen to music for the last couple of hours when I could've followed this.

''oh, while i'm here. i know you dropped out of this long ago, julio, but isn't it silly for you to deride the NME on the basis that they're stuck down the "we hate pop" road? i can't remember the last pop rekkid you didn't slag mercilessly. not trying to start something, just curious...''

I am following on and off. I've only been in this board for a year so I didn't know much about doomie. Have to agree it is very entertaining. Well done Jerry you have really added the 'fourth dimension' this thread needed.

Mark p- you're not 'starting anything'. I'm happy to answer: what I'm criticizing is NMEs attitude. They will ridicule pop and yet put the very same pop they hate on the cover (because that is what sells). or they will put industry approved 'indie' bands on there (the very same thing).

as i recall whenever a thread is started on a pop single I usually don't go to these threads unless its indie related (the strokes or white stripes, say). i don't listen to radio anymore...so I can't comment on the single unless I happen to hear it and feel strongly about it.

I haven't even heard the vines...

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

david h-send me your details again, sorry, i can't remember which thread it is where you posted them. email me if you like. I'll chat with you soemtime after monday (or tonight if you're quick).

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

mark p- how are you? how is it going?

Julio Desouza, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

mark s came up with the serious answer that i was looking for - i am not - ummmm - part of jerry's quest and nor should be i be drawn to it. i have my own. jerry's quest is a peripharal to mine.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ps. lisa, i'm hardly a careerist - if i were, i would not have spent this much time arguing with jerry. i would have been planning my big taker over at the nme, or ctcl, or kerrang!!!

but in reality all the magazines cover different territory and appeal for different reasons.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

and that's really it - nothing is better it's just different. apples/oranges/pineapples. i know nme readers and wire readers and well, i don't know anybody who reads ctcl but it's just for different reasons. the only magazine taht i think is a rip off is q. i've never bought an issue of q either.

doomie, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i googled doomie, is he the in-house puff review generator for poptones?

keith, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.moreheep.com/lineup71.jpg

unknown or illegal user, Friday, 16 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I really, really hope this thread isn't going to fall down the changeover crack between the two boards. It would be a tragedy of Greek proprtions.

Is no one goint to blow the whistle on Doomie's real identity then? Go on, you know you want to...

Matt DC, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"Tell me how would you be a music journalist without free cds and guest lists, Jerry?"

um... you could pay for CDs and gig tickets, perhaps? which i have done, many times, and will continue to do...

stevie, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Kudos to doomie for taking on the big'n'bullying Everett True. Doomie is a great rock'n'roll outsider which makes great reviews. This thread is a school yard fight where the weirdo is hassled and bullied out of the rock'n'roll party. Which is what rock'n'roll should be about. Weirdos. Outsiders. I would rather read doomie than Everett. And the bullying should really stop.

Dustin, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"um... you could pay for CDs and gig tickets, perhaps? which i have done, many times, and will continue to do..."

Surely you don't pay for a band that you do not particularly want to see, do you?

The bullying continues.

Dustin, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Twats'n'Prats.

Dustin, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie and jerry are both idiots. stevie said he ahs paid many times (not all the time). you shouldn't get everything for free you know.

Julio Desouza, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"doomie and jerry are both idiots. stevie said he ahs paid many times (not all the time). you shouldn't get everything for free you know."

This whole thread is idiotic and bullying.

Dustin, Saturday, 17 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"doomie and jerry are both idiots. stevie said he ahs paid many times (not all the time). you shouldn't get everything for free you know."



This whole thread is idiotic and bullying.

Cool...does this mean someone has already mentioned goat wank or spackle yet?

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Sunday, 18 August 2002 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread gave Andy Partridge another fit, bastards.

Chris Ott, Sunday, 18 August 2002 03:29 (twenty-two years ago)

''Cool...does this mean someone has already mentioned goat wank or spackle yet?''

calum must thread!

hey, 'dustin', how are you doing today?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 18 August 2002 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)

personally, i don't think people have been bullying dustin. a read through the thread seems to suggest a certain antipathy for both brownell and thackray. i would imagine for similar reasons (being the similarity between the two)

gareth (gareth), Sunday, 18 August 2002 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)

dusty, what do you think of Kevin Ayers? Moodymann? Todd Edwards? Alec R Constandinos?

gareth (gareth), Sunday, 18 August 2002 10:59 (twenty-two years ago)

""um... you could pay for CDs and gig tickets, perhaps? which i have done, many times, and will continue to do..."
Surely you don't pay for a band that you do not particularly want to see, do you? "

i generally don't go to see bands i don't particularly want to see, so draw your own conclusion. but i have bought PLENTY of records on various whims and been, by turns, elated and dejected.

stevie, Monday, 19 August 2002 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

c*lum must thread!
Um, don't you know that mentioning the name of a demon only gives it power?

Lord Custos Alpha (Lord Custos Alpha), Monday, 19 August 2002 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Careless Wanks Cost Kittens.

david h (david h), Wednesday, 21 August 2002 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

six months pass...
Did anyone ever buy CTCL? Ive never seen it anywhere yet. Is it still going?

brodley, Sunday, 23 February 2003 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Yup. Next issue currently being planned.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

next issue out 1st march, actually. Daniel Johnston/Will Oldham cover.

available from: hmv, borders, virgin, record shops, newsagents.. all that shit.

david mc, Sunday, 23 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)

David Mc - you've got an e-mail coming your way!

Hey Ned, I got scouted for CTCL, yo yo yo.

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 23 February 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)

ONE OF US.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 February 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, it's getting to the point where it's got more cache NOT to be asked to write for CTCL...

kate, Monday, 24 February 2003 08:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Agreed about the "cache" point. We already foresaw that.

When CTCL reaches issue one, we're gonna sackeveryone (if you CAN sack unpaid contributors, that is) and begin anew: I myself will be looking after the design, Steve after the words, and Andrew after photography. And David Mc - who is the only man (I'm guessing here, having never met) who does any work around here - can handle our debts... I mean, business side.

Jerry (Jerry), Monday, 24 February 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

woohoo promotion from '(imaginary - space and time being only relative and squishy constructs in ctcl-land) office footstool' to 'professional whipping boy'.

who is cozen??

david mc, Monday, 24 February 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

you might want to take a look at the state of my post-uni accounts before we get to issue one, then.

david mc, Monday, 24 February 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I was joking, David

Jerry (Jerry), Monday, 24 February 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

mm.

david mc, Monday, 24 February 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and Jerry - it worked! Heh heh! This next column sure will be interesting... tee hee hee.

kate, Monday, 24 February 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

David Mc - I tried to e-mail you but the address you post under here doesn't exist (or so I was informed by one Colin Browne) - e-mail me your real address please.

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 24 February 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

six months pass...
Where is CTCL sold in Yorkshire?

Thomas Ramsbottom, Friday, 12 September 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Is ittrue CTCL is ending after Issue 1?

Robin J, Tuesday, 16 September 2003 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Thomas, check the website, there should be Yorkshire info on there somewhere!

Robin, yes, it's ending with issue #1. Its gonna be a doozie.

stevie (stevie), Tuesday, 16 September 2003 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.