Pazz and Jop 2010

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Just got my ballot.

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

Me too.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

I haven't voted since 2006. Surprising, I don't miss it.

Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

Haven't gotten my ballot yet, but I've begun relistening to my favourite albums to see what order my lists will be in/what will make them.

altered boners (rennavate), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

i got mine

i forget, is there a way to input albums & "save" the ballot? or was that just jackin pop?

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

got mine!

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

i forget, is there a way to input albums & "save" the ballot? or was that just jackin pop?

Usually you can.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

i just realized like, last week, that my ballot on last year's P&J site is messed up, my top 2 albums are at #9 and #10 and everything else is two spots higher -- don't know if it was my fault but i'm gonna be really careful when i submit this year

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

K, ballot arrived.

altered boners (rennavate), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

100 points for Lil B.

altered boners (rennavate), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 01:30 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ "Hey Soul Sister" being the example song title in the e-mail announcement. that song's been just outside my top 10 but i'm kind of tempted to vote for it now.

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 01:30 (fifteen years ago)

Ballot received, submitted. I probably haven't even heard your favorite album, so I almost certainly didn't vote for it.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)

lol ok tough guy

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

What other job can someone legitimately brag about how little they know about doing their job?

I'm sure there's some dude that's working on the Hadron Collider that's all "Yeah I don't really care about the Higgs mechanism for generating elementary particle masses via electroweak symmetry."

john jjjusten jingleheimer smh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

his post isn't hilarious because he's saying "I don't know anything about music," it's hilarious because he's all "hey everyone sending me copies of your favorite album in 'For Your Consideration' envelopes, you can just stop it, I've made up my mind"

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

whoops, whiney's back
and cranky!
welcome back cranky man.

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

What other job can someone legitimately brag about how little they know about doing their job?

Dude, we've met face to face exactly once and I liked you then, and I enjoyed having you as a PTW editor. But your idea of what a music critic's job is is totally fucked and off-base. Has been pretty much as long as you've been doing it. Basically, you're frantically defibrillating a long-dead paradigm. Generalist, buffet-table pop criticism is dead. Specialist genre criticism is all that matters anymore, because listener communities are atomized, self-sealing and frequently hostile to outside input. I am a metal writer and a jazz writer, who occasionally writes about Latin music. I know who I'm writing for, and more importantly, I know who I'm not writing for. And I'm not gonna pretend to give a flying fuck about Taylor Swift or Kanye West just because all the other writers on my Twitter feed still think platinum-selling records "say" "something" "about" "the culture." There is no monoculture. Pick a niche and grind it out.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

man, gis'ing "dogfight" to find an image to kick this back and forth off was one of the dumbest things i'm going to do today

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

Don't waste your time; I'm sure one or the other of us will be banned any minute now.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2008/06/clash-titans-remake-2.jpg

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

man i can't do anything right this morning. going back to bed.

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

i probably agree with more of that post than i disagree with, but man that was one scenery-chewing rant, man. you say your passion is metal and jazz, but are you sure it isn't The Theatre?

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

wait i have to go to work. never mind. bed so warm though...

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

Scott you're making me jealous. I'm already AT work and you're three hours ahead of me!

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

tbh i often worry that my dilettantism is counterproductive and weakens my ability to get my hands around the specifics or depths of a genre but when you're primarily a listener/promoter and only occasionally (and amateurishly) a critic in the way that i am, i think it's an apples and oranges debate.
vocationally... i dunno. i'd be curious to see you two duke it out on this point if you can keep it above the belt.

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

Eh, I'm as generalist as they come, maybe. Have been kind of forever. But I still don't get how "doing your job" necessarily equals "listening to the same records everybody else listens to." Just the opposite, a lot of the time. (Also don't think I agree with somedude, or have ever seen the "envelopes" he's referring to. After decades of voting in these polls, I'm pretty wary of albums that I suddenly convince myself I connect with in December, vote for, and then never listen to again. I haven't voted yet, probably won't for a couple weeks, but my ballot's fairly set in stone, I think. Even tentatively figured out the points last night. If some album gets released before December 31 and I wind up totally loving it, I can always stick in on next year's ballot.)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

But I still don't get how "doing your job" necessarily equals "listening to the same records everybody else listens to."

Cosign eternally etc.

Also if/how you change a listener means a hell of a lot. I'm still actively engaged with music but I am not constantly marinating in it as I did when I was younger. I'm not going to force myself to return to that older pattern since that change actually gave me a lot of peace of mind and I'd be nuts to go back.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

i might actually vote for the waka flocka album. and i only just heard it last week. but its addictive. so keep those cards and letters coming.

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

and i'd like to thank hell's headbangers records for the fruit basket.

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

Unperson, I like your blog and posts and writing on Latin music. But per your post on the 2010 magazine thread, you have also apparently decided that no metal, Latin, or jazz music is released after Thanksgiving (around the time your Wire ballot was due), and that you have heard everything in those genres for 2010 that you need to hear, already. I don't get that.

Chuck, you never miss anything through the year up to this point that interests you? You've heard all the Southern soul and country that might be of interest to you already?

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

No, of course not! I'm sure I've missed a ton. (More metal and hip-hop and Latin than country or soul these days.) Always do; it's impossible not to -- and I've probably heard a thousand or more albums this year. But I want to live with albums before I vote for them, so they can really sink in; forcefeeding at the last minute (in my case, anyway) just isn't reliable from a taste standpoint.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

December releases always have the odds set against them as far as year-end lists are concerned, don't hold that against one guy.

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

OK, first off, just because you seemed to get this out of the way in your post: I'll add that yeah, none of this is personal and I loved working with you and I hope to work with you again, love following you on Twitter, and consider you a bro, etc etc etc. This is def nothing more personal than two peers having an online debate, so moderator forks needs to stop trying to turn this into BEEF IV

Anyway, obviously, I love your passion for jazz and metal, and you have def turned me on to a good record or two over the years. My problem is not that you refuse to listen to Kanye/Taylor/Grizzly Bear/etc, its that you always use your ignorance of pop music as a pole to raise you flag upon. Like, I can't fault anyone for not caring about Adam Lambert, I'm faulting you because you constantly think its grounds for bragging rights. And yeah, you are def right about the music audience getting more stratified and retreating to more insular worlds, but I generally see this as a BAD THING and its hard for me to wrap my head around not wanting to see these walls topple

john jjjusten jingleheimer smh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

xp I mean, the Pazz & Jop letter has always stressed "year of impact." If I hear anything new and great at this point, it's almost guaranteed to impact me more in 2011 than 2010.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

What xhuxk said; plus, I know what labels' release schedules are, and I do know there's nothing coming out this month that might make its way onto my year-end lists.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

Generalist, buffet-table pop criticism is dead. Specialist genre criticism is all that matters anymore, because listener communities are atomized, self-sealing and frequently hostile to outside input.

i think whiney's got his specialist thing going, too; i have a pretty good idea of what he'll think of a given album before he fires off a tweeted "review" a couple weeks after its release. he just likes to comment on what he doesn't like as well, which is where the generalist aspect comes into play. but really, if whiney likes the kanye album as much as sightings or yelawolf or dalek, why should he restrict himself to only talking about albums that fall under a specific genre umbrella? i'd say the unspoken reason you're a jazz and metal critic is that you enjoy listening to metal and jazz a lot; some writers prefer a more widescreen approach, instead of a specialist one. neither's right or wrong, and neither is "dead" -- just different approaches

my 2 cents

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

also, fuck a grizzly bear

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

My problem is not that you refuse to listen to Kanye/Taylor/Grizzly Bear/etc, its that you always use your ignorance of pop music as a pole to raise you flag upon. Like, I can't fault anyone for not caring about Adam Lambert, I'm faulting you because you constantly think its grounds for bragging rights.

Well, it's intended as more of a joke than it's maybe received as. But it ties into a larger point which is my view that a lot of (indie and pop) records are really only super fucking important to a few dozen critics who all follow each other on Twitter and Facebook, and who then jabber about them in terms that basically boil down to "You haven't heard this? This isn't hugely important to your life? What kind of person are you?" And my point is, well, the records that are super important to me are records so-called "generalist" critics would probably would look at like something they scraped off the bottom of their shoes. So I ridicule that whole approach for being a) attached to an utterly fictional idea of music audiences, and b) every bit as insular as headbangers or techno obsessives, while pretending to be all-inclusive.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor,

i mean businesswise, there's no doubt that Phil's way is much smarter and much more profitable. (So many times I hear editors asking me "who's a good metal guy" or "who's a good rap guy"). As a writer it's def good business and def the way of the future. But as a music fan, it's extremely limiting.

Phil, you're really missing out on the Kanye record

john jjjusten jingleheimer smh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

Phil, you're really missing out on the every Kanye record

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

What about cultures that follow other calendars?

bourgeoistech bourgeoisthèque (_Rudipherous_), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

None of Kanye's singles (I have MTV at my house, guys, and YouTube on my computer) have ever converted me.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

curious how much time you spend watching MTV if you deliberately don't give a fuck about most "big" albums

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

busted.

john jjjusten jingleheimer smh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

Albums are way more of a time and energy investment than occasional videos or singles, though. If you don't connect with the selected samples you're hearing or seeing, it's usually (not always) an indication that you won't connect with the album, either.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

really boring thread so far guys

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

lets try to make these controversies really mean something

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

new board description ^^

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

December releases always have the odds set against them as far as year-end lists are concerned

this allegedly comes out today, coincidentally

http://musicistheheartofoursoul.toxicstrut.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/HinderAllAmericanNightmare.jpg

da croupier, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

i'd love to vote in P&J but i dont write anyplace except for ILX, and typically just send my year-end list around to irl friends and facebook ppl and so forth. but i do have my top ten albums about 90% worked up!

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

Good thing I didn't submit my ballot yet!

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

I've had the Hinder album for over a month; it sucks. I didn't like Hinder before, but this one's their worst yet. They're going in a Nickelback/country direction instead of an old-Buckcherry/strip-club-rock direction. Bleah.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like lousy directions regardless

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ lending one's ears to the hinder album, but refusing to play kanye even once

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

The Hinder album falls under job requirements; they opened the last Mötley Crüe tour, ergo they're not metal but at least metal-adjacent. Would I have sought it out? Hell no. But their publicist sent it to me for possible use on MSN.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

i want to vote for p&j :( but I write for a crappy gossip website right now so.... :|

no hipster hats (The Brainwasher), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor, plz to take into account what unperson -- and xhuxk, for that matter -- said about 'if you don't like the singles then the album probably won't do much for you.' Or have you never made judgments that way yourself?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

The reason this debate really interests me is because I find myself torn right down the middle. I mean, I'm on board with Phil when it comes to the need for specialization. As music grows more and more fractured and increasingly specialized micro-genres pop up, it is impossible to keep up with everything. So why bother even pretending that you can? As broad-reaching and well-intentioned as one may be, there will still be, quite literally, hundreds of things you miss out on. On that level, it makes sense to say, "I love jazz and know the shit out of it, so I'm going to stay in this cubbyhole". But this never works for me personally. I can say, "oh yeah, this year I really want to focus more on metal", but three weeks later I will hear a Jazmine Sullivan single I like and decide I need to spend some time with that and I end up chasing down different strains in spite of myself.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

i want to vote for p&j :( but I write for a crappy gossip website right now so.... :|

― no hipster hats (The Brainwasher), Tuesday, December 7, 2010 10:05 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

just email harvilla

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

is it a crappy gossip site that does album reviews? imo brainwasher's musical knowledge being wasted on gossip and only gossip would be a shame.

some dude, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

It should be obvious, but should also be noted for the record that I don't totally limit myself to listening to what I get paid to listen to. No one's paying me to be obsessed with Ayumi Hamasaki or Perfume, for example.

that's not funny. (unperson), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

On that level, it makes sense to say, "I love jazz and know the shit out of it, so I'm going to stay in this cubbyhole". But this never works for me personally. I can say, "oh yeah, this year I really want to focus more on metal", but three weeks later I will hear a Jazmine Sullivan single I like and decide I need to spend some time with that and I end up chasing down different strains in spite of myself.

Most of us are guilty of this!

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

i would rather brainwasher submit a ballot than 90% of "proper" "rock" "critics". email harvilla, brainwasher!

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, go for it brainwasher -- no reason why not.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

i kind of agree with both whiney and unperson - really the answer is to do whatever you're best at, some people are good at being dilettante generalists and others good at specialism - as long as you're aware of the pitfalls of each. and i think awareness of artists above a certain stature is a good thing, but it sounds like unperson already does things like check kanye singles out on youtube.

what's really nagl is to start throwing around accusations of people not doing their jobs just cuz they choose a different approach to you, though.

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

xp well there's a music section but there's no reviews

but yeah I'll definitely email him now thanks guys

no hipster hats (The Brainwasher), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

this made me laugh:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/pop-culture-expert-surprisingly-not-ashamed-of-sel,18481/

scott seward, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor, plz to take into account what unperson -- and xhuxk, for that matter -- said about 'if you don't like the singles then the album probably won't do much for you.' Or have you never made judgments that way yourself?

yeah of course i do this all the time, it's a pretty reliable way to decide how to allocate one's mu$ic purcha$ing dollar$ and/or listening hours. and i did overlook that hinder could've been a job requirement.

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

But I want to live with albums before I vote for them, so they can really sink in; forcefeeding at the last minute (in my case, anyway) just isn't reliable from a taste standpoint.

For albums, I'd agree with that; with singles, which is all I vote for, not really. There were at least three or four years where I went with what amounts to the forcefeeding route. (Less so, this year.) If you work at a job that isn't even remotely connected with music or writing about music, the reality of the situation (for me, anyway) is that you just can't keep up with new music like you once did--there are only so many hours in the day. So starting in late November, I'd make myself (or get a friend to make for me) a bunch of mix-CDs of stuff I thought I might conceivably like. And sure enough, I would always end up finding a number of songs to supplement the handful that I already knew would be going on my list. When I look back on those late additions now, they're just fine; I'm pretty good at knowing fairly quickly whether or not I'm going to like something. (Not necessarily, I realize, a good thing; someone else my say my tastes calcified many years ago.)

So if life circumstances make it difficult to keep up, but you still take an interest in participating in these polls, and still think you can come up with something worth saying, the forcefeeding route is not the crime against nature you might think it is. Is my ballot exactly what it would be if I'd heard everything that an ambitious full-time writer would have heard during the course of the year? No--but so what? It's 10 songs I like, and it's just a year-end poll.

clemenza, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

I should clarify that it's not just my job that holds me back from keeping up; a large percentage of the music I listen to in the car is older stuff, either by a year or two or much older. To keep up, I'd have to curtail a lot of that listening, and that's something I don't want to do.

clemenza, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

i credit singles jukebox with exposing me to more new music than any other avenue. having assigned listening works!

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

just out of curiosity: do any of you make an attempt to keep up with the top 40 album list (weekly/monthly/annually/whatever)?

hipity-hopity muzik ftw! (Ioannis), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, there are times when I would love for someone to assign me songs (or albums) to write about. Best way I've discovered to force yourself outside of your comfort zone.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

i've been going thru the Singles Jukebox 2010 front to back since a couple months ago -- found a bunch of great stuff I'd likely not have heard otherwise!

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

I mean this in the leasy zingy way possible, but Singles Jukebox is kind of hilarious in that it allows many rock critics and music geeks to finally be exposed the most popular songs in the country

john jjjusten jingleheimer smh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^ Your statement would be more true if TSJ were comprised solely of ILM guys. A good chunk of us remain avid radio listeners.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, but isn't the jury divided pretty well between the States and the UK? I think that gives some of them legitimate reasons for not encountering a relatively big hit from somewhere else. I know a lot of the British hits they feature are new to me.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

i think maybe whiney mean the readership? no one who writes for the site is really a 'rock critic' at all

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

is the singles jukebox returning anytime soon?

prolego, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

I prefer "retired rock critics."

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

well, voted. i wish they still sent confirmation emails.

LAMBDA LAMBDA LANDA (Beatrix Kiddo), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

no one who writes for the site is really a 'rock critic' at all

Um...

xhuxk, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

I mean this in the leasy zingy way possible, but Singles Jukebox is kind of hilarious in that it allows many rock critics and music geeks to finally be exposed the most popular songs in the country

lolz aside, i actually find it useful to keep up w/ stuff that's popular in the UK and so forth, not the US

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

wow, i've really missed these online throwdowns

LAMBDA LAMBDA LANDA (Beatrix Kiddo), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

Um...

― xhuxk, Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:21 PM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark

sorry!

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw i was pretty u_u when Jukebox recently did the 'amnesty week' thing for writers to suggest singles we hadn't covered and i was one of like 2 or 3 people that picked something charting or with any significant US mainstream profile

Local Hardman (some dude), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

and i'm not just grumbling "indie fuxors" there, it's a diverse set of songs, but it's kinda like hey guys you know there are some actual big hit songs we haven't gotten to yet

Local Hardman (some dude), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

i meant to nom jeremih but i totally missed the deadline

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

i'm hoping jordan means "rock" to be the operative word in that "no one is a real rock critic" thing!

Yeah, but isn't the jury divided pretty well between the States and the UK? I think that gives some of them legitimate reasons for not encountering a relatively big hit from somewhere else. I know a lot of the British hits they feature are new to me.

this is true, but at the same time i do feel sometimes - and i mean this w/all due love - that some jukebox writers do seem to think that "uhh duhhh i don't know who this is or anything about it and i'm not going to bother to find out" is an adequate basis to review things, and they play that up sometimes.

JORDAN WRITE MORE JUKEBOX STUFF GODDAMNIT! uh if it ever starts again :/

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i'm gonna do the amnesty stuff

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

Oh yeah, lex, I'm totally with you on that. I don't really enjoy the reviews where the writer seems to blow off any context that may be interesting.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

i obviously get not being interested in the context - not even rock critics can be expected to be interested in everything - but what i do in those cases is not review the track in question

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

my scoring average is so low when i stick to genres i like and artists i know that i'm just afraid 'branching out' would make me seem like a total music-hating psycho

Local Hardman (some dude), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

i submitted an app to write for the jukebox -- never heard back ;_;

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

"it's kinda like hey guys you know there are some actual big hit songs we haven't gotten to yet"
there's too many! site's been on hibernation/quarter pace for roughly a month and i had over two dozen amnesty options so i just picked the one i wanted to see get a little bit of exposure since dude is pretty much invisible except for his facebook right now

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

though it hurt me not to nominate Mindless Behavior "My Girl.
Or Yelawolf.
Or "Bed Intruder"! You have no idea how painful it was to not nom bed intruder.
/postsverymuchincharacter.com

Lou Ferrigno (Hulken) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:00 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor, email Swygart again, I'm sure you could get on. Honestly. There's no reason why you shouldn't be able to.

Also, xhuxk is 3|)|)Y, right?

altered boners (rennavate), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:35 (fifteen years ago)

right-o!

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

xhuxk "1337" 3|)|)Y

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

can someone that knows my email hit me with the url for the jukebox portal? thanks

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

sent to your twitter as message

altered boners (rennavate), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

thx

gimme schefter (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 7 December 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

last call tonight.

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

Where's my ballot? I want to give Kanye West loads and loads of points!

acoleuthic, Friday, 24 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

i forgot to vote for fantasia's "man of the house" on my trax ballot FUCKING AARGH

it was so hard narrowing it down, can we petition to make at least the trax ballot a 20 next time

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

any reason not to post ballots/alternates here? I just finished kneejerk boiling down mine.

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

if i could bloody remember it! i thought i'd be able to go back in to edit it (luckily the fantasia is the only regret, and i only realised that 4 hours after submitting anyway)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

stuff i was sad to cut

albums

taylor swift - speak now
hot chip - one life stand
jazmine sullivan - love me back
girls - broken dreams club ep

songs

roll deep - good times (ill blu remix)
tinie tempah - pass out
lil boosie - top to the bottom
trey songz ft nicki minaj - bottoms up

J0rdan S., Friday, 24 December 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

stuff i was sad to cut:

albums -

erykah badu - new amerykah part two (return of the ankh)
dj nate - da trak genious
the jacka & laroo - neva be the same
we love - we love
fantasia - back to me

trax -

katy b - katy on a mission
fantasia - man of the house
tinie tempah - pass out
jamie woon - night air
willow smith - whip my hair
gyptian ft. nicki minaj - hold yuh
princess nyah - pon de floor
brenmar - taking it down
white ring - ixc999
storm queen - look right through
teairra mari ft. mavado - coins
princesa - más fuego

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

albums
*Big Boi - Sir Lucious Left Foot: The Return of Chico Dusty
*Guido - Anidea
*Yelawolf - Trunk Muzik / 0-60
*The-Dream - Love King
*Owen Pallett - Heartland
*The Carolina Chocolate Drops - Genuine Negro Jig
*Sharon Jones - I Learned the Hard Way
*Cherryholmes - IV: Common Threads
*Shangaan Electro - New Wave Dance Music from South Africa
*Taylor Swift - Speak Now

stuff that came close
Alphabeat - The Beat Is...
Die Antwoord - $0$
Ellie Goulding - Lights
Erykah Badu - New Amerykah Part Two
Luca Brazi - Brainfood
The Nels Cline Singers - Initiate
Ratatat - LP4
Tonetta777 - 777
Reggie Watts - Why Shit So Crazy?
Lindstrom and Christabelle - Real Life Is No Cool
Ethan Lipton - Honker
Devin tha Dude - Suite #420
Josh Turner - Haywire
Laura Marling - I Speak Because I Can
Robyn - Body Talk 1/2/3
Rusko - OMG!
Sade - Soldier of Love
Curren$y - Pilot Talk I and II
Sleigh Bells - Treats
Yeasayer - Odd Blood
Ke$ha - Animal

wish i'd heard/heard more: the ark, cibelle, merle haggard, das racist, keri hilson, jeremih, e-40, underworld, massive attack, k. michelle, jazmine sullivan, big KRIT, sun city girl, sufjan, tallest man on earth, pantha du prince, tracy thorn, kanye, jamey johnson, coati mundi, r kelly, caribou, cee lo, ciara, four tet, bird and the bee, the knife

Singles -
- Tensnake - Coma Cat
- DJ Fresh and Ce'Cile - Gold Dust
- Trey Songz and Nicki Minaj - Bottoms Up
- Big Boi - Shutterbug
- Ne Yo - One In a Million
- Janelle Monae - Tightrope
- Willow Smith - Whip My Hair
- YG - Toot it and Boot it
- Staygold - Backseat
- Bed Intruder - The Gregory Brothers and Antoine Dodson

a few alternate singles
Die Antwoord - Enter the Ninja
Die Antwoord - I Don't Need You
Jeremih - Waiter (The 5 Senses)
Jerrod Niemann - Lover Lover
Sia - Clap Your Hands
Usher and Nicki Minaj - Lil Freak
Lil B - The Age of Information
Gold Panda - Quitters Raga
Sia - You've Changed
Ciara - Ride
Ciara - Gimme Dat
Rihanna - What's My Name
Rihanna - Rude Boy
Hot Chip - One Life Stand
Taylor Swift - You Belong With Me (Tom Vinoya's Hotel Lobby Remix)
My Chemical Romance - Na Na Na etc

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

iirc my actual ballot went

albums -

ciara - basic instinct
jazmine sullivan - love me back
the-dream - love king
sade - soldier of love
k. michelle - what's the 901?
taylor swift - speak now
diddy - dirty money - last train to paris
ikonika - contact, love, want, have
laura marling - i speak because i can
glasser - ring

trax

girl unit - wut
kingdom ft shyvonne - mind reader
waka flocka flame - hard in da paint
lady gaga ft. beyoncé - telephone
sunny sweeney - from a table away
kourtney heart ft. magnolia shorty - my boy
horror inc - aurore
creep ft. romy madley croft - days
rich boy ft. yelawolf - go crazy
nicki minaj ft. sean garrett - massive attack

oh yeah i didn't fucking expect, while going through my p&j contenders, to discover that one of them had fucking DIED from getting SHOT 26 TIMES three days ago. rip magnolia shorty ;_;

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

i actually put up Trunk Muzik / Trunk Muzik 0-60 as one album, let's see what that gets me.

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

I reviewed more singles than ever yet was excited but few of them.

I sent my ballot on Tuesday, and comments an hour ago.Hooray!

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

i sent a comment on willow smith, trying to get myself to write one on waka, but we'll see

J0rdan S., Friday, 24 December 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

i couldn't be arsed w/comments. the surprise maths w/having to allocate 100 points exhausted me mentally.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i really pity the intern that has to check everyone's math -- my first go at points came up w/ 110 before i fixed it

J0rdan S., Friday, 24 December 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

mine came up at 189 :/

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

J0rdan S., Friday, 24 December 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

Just give everything a ten.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

why the fuck didn't i vote for willow smith

and FANTASIA

AAAARGHHHHHH who on earth decided a ballot of ten tracks was an acceptable thing

i feel very strongly that any critic who struggles to fill their ballots should NOT BE A CRITIC

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

i'd like to do some comments but i need a few days off from work to do it. wonder if i can sneak in with some stuff prior to jan 1?

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah, all albums got a ten. I don't understand weighting otherwise; it's impossible enough for me to pick my ten favorite albums, much less rank THEM.

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

and fuck, i haven't even heard the new prince yet! I feel like i been slacking on music this year.

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 December 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

I always post my list and comments on my page, so I'll link to them here. There's been a year-end in one of the Toronto weeklies that I've been voting in since 1991, but they packed it in this year; some weird idea that that were too many lists and polls in the world, and that theirs just got lost in the shuffle. I'm always a little more surprised each year when Pazz & Jop keeps going, but I'm glad it does.

clemenza, Sunday, 26 December 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I didn't have time to do comments :-\ my ballot was

ALBUMS
Big Krit - Krit Wuz Here
Janelle Monae - The Archandroid
Jazmine Sullivan - Love Me Back
Waka Flocka Flame - Flockaveli
Fantasia - Back to Me
Roc Marciano - Marcberg
Gucci Mane - Mr. Zone 6
Araabmuzik - Instrumental Kings 5
Glasser - Ring
Diddy-Dirty Money - Last Train to Paris

TRACKS
Ciara "Ride"
Storm Queen "Look Right Through"
Lil B "Like A Martian"
Miguel "All I Want Is You"
Adele "Rolling in the Deep"
Young Jeezy "Lose My Mind"
Kim Ann Foxman "Creature"
Aloe Blacc "I Need A Dollar"
Travis Porter "Make It Rain"
Kelis "4th of July (Fireworks)"

but like as soon as I pressed enter I wanted to change my whole list lol

albums that almost made it/i wish i would've spent more time with before making list: ciara, r. kelly, flying lotus, monica, actress, jose james, vado, lindstrom & christabele, jeremih, J*davey, quadron, caribou, kelis, bilal, nina sky.. a few others

tracks: too many to mention... i kind of just picked 10 random tracks lol

and I did weigh my votes, giving jazmine & fantasia more than anyone just because I figured a bunch of people would vote for The Archandroid and jaz/tasia could use the points more

the nutwasher (The Brainwasher), Sunday, 26 December 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

my ilx poll ballot is going to look totally different lol

the nutwasher (The Brainwasher), Sunday, 26 December 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, i would've included "all i want is you" if i'd have thought of it.
really also do need to listen to J*davey and bilal albums

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 26 December 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

it's impossible enough for me to pick my ten favorite albums, much less rank THEM.

That's where the strategic voting comes in for me -- trying to give extra boost to things that I think might need them (this year, T.Swift, M.I.A., N.Nastasia).

Anyway I dithered and barely got mine in, and immediately started kicking myself for leaving off U.S. Girls. Oh well.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 26 December 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

My ballot:

Albums:
1. Janelle Monae – The ArchAndroid
2. Deerhunter – Halycon Digest
3. Agalloch – Marrow of the Spirit
4. Nachtmystium – Addicts: Black Meddle Pt. II
5. Warpaint – The Fool
6. Rangda – False Flag
7. The Drums – The Drums
8. Bottomless Pit – Blood Under the Bridge
9. Flying Lotus – Cosmogramma
10. Kylesa – Spiral Shadow

Singles:
1. "Fuck You" - Cee-Lo Green
2. "Not In Love" - Crystal Castles f. Robert Smith
3. "Monster" - Kanye West f. Jay-Z, Rick Ross, Nicki Minaj, & Bon Iver
4. "Dancing On My Own" - Robyn
5. "Tightrope" - Janelle Monae f. Big Boi
6. "Stylo" - Gorillaz f. Bobby Womack & Mos Def
7. "Power" - Kanye West
8. "Desire Lines" - Deerhunter
9. "Me and the Moon" - The Drums
10. "Swim" - Surfer Blood

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 26 December 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

1. Harvey Milk – A Small Turn Of Human Kindness
2. Big Boi – Sir Lucious Left Foot: The Son of Chico Dusty
3. Kanye West - My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
4. Linkin Park – A Thousand Suns
5. Yelawolf - Trunk Music: 0-60
6. E-40 – Revenue Retrievin’: Day Shift
7. Waka Flocka Flame – Flockaveli
8. The Chemical Brothers – Further
9. Sightings – City Of Straw
10. Rick Ross - Teflon Don

1. Cee Lo Green - "Fuck You"
2. Kanye West - "Runaway"
3. E-40 ft. Clyde Carson & Husulah - "Lightweight Jammin'"
4. La Roux - "Bulletproof"
5. Waka Flocka Flame - "Hard In Da Paint"
6. Aloe Blacc - "Femme Fatale"
7. Gucci Mane ft. Swizz Beatz - "Gucci Time"
8. Goldfrapp - "Alive"
9. Deftones - "Rocket Skates"
10. David Guetta & Chris Willis ft. Fergie and LMFAO- "Getting Over You"

kenny noggins (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 26 December 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

Its hard to fit everything into my top 10. Only two African artists for me this year (in part because I did not hear enough, and some albums that I did hear did not wow me--sorry AfroCubism). I feel bad that I didn't squeeze Gil Scott-Heron in somewhere--was gonna put "New York is Killing Me" in my singles/track list but it didn't make it at the last moment, nor did some Southern chitlin circuit soul tracks, and some rock ones as well.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 26 December 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

what j*davey is this you guys are talking about, the ep from january?

r|t|c, Sunday, 26 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

is that the one with "end of the world (mama's back)" on it? i liked that song a lot

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

immediately started kicking myself for leaving off U.S. Girls.

love this disc, despite it being a little . . . same-y? best moment is when she lifts the fog/fuzz for red ford radio.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 26 December 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah "red ford radio" totally should have made my singles list. It was on my shortlist i don't know how i left it off. the perils of last-minute voting. gonna vote for it in ilm for sure.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

4. La Roux - "Bulletproof"

Torn about whether to include this on my best-of-2010 mix. I guess it did peak on U.S. charts this year.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

it was a single in 2010, what else do you need?

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

for it not to suck i imagine

r|t|c, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)

it was a single in 2010, what else do you need?

Was it? Wiki sez released in June 2009 in the UK and July 2009 in the US.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

Well it broke in 2010. You're starting to sound like jaymc

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

Oh.

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

well... it certainly peaked in the US this summer and it was re-released as a single on may 11 2010

BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

lol rtc

k3vin k., Monday, 27 December 2010 01:02 (fifteen years ago)

Albums, 10 each: Big Boi, Bloody Mary, the Bug EP, Deadbeat, Mark E, F, Flying Lotus, Friendly Fires, Lone, Sleigh Bells.

slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Monday, 27 December 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

friendly fires?

BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Monday, 27 December 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

Torn about whether to include this on my best-of-2010 mix

kmt

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 08:30 (fifteen years ago)

Mix is 80+ songs, for the record. It's not in my top 10 or even 20.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 27 December 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

A+ to jon via chi and whiney's ballots, both

need to check out asap: agalloch, warpaint, harvey milk, e-40, waka

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 27 December 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

you really don't have to check out warpaint, fwiw

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

it's that poor, huh ;_;

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 27 December 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Don't just take whiney's word for it. Its really good.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 27 December 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

i like "undertow" enough to be curious; will check it out

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 27 December 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

e-40 and waka first, obv

k3vin k., Monday, 27 December 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

kmt

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, December 27, 2010 3:30 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

rmde @ you suddenly saying this constantly for the last few weeks

some dude, Monday, 27 December 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

I had to look it up.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 27 December 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

always amazed at intersections and diversions; whiney, you've got a few singles I utterly HATED on your best of and a few albums i loved

it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Monday, 27 December 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

rmde @ you suddenly saying this constantly for the last few weeks

i've been saying it for years. contrary to what US posters insist on believing, it is a v.common thing in the UK. if you've noticed it more in recent weeks, that's purely to do with EOY lists and the idea that anyone, anywhere, enjoys the music of that harpy and generally terrible person elly jackson.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think warpaint are really good but the album is def worth checking out, it's pretty nice

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

"pretty nice" is basically a glowing recommendation coming from lex, considering he calls someone he doesn't like a "harpy" and "terrible person"

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 27 December 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

i've been saying it for years.

it's been cringeworthy for years.

The Reverend, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

also you are the only british person i've seen use it

The Reverend, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

rmde @ you suddenly saying this constantly for the last few weeks

i've been saying it for years. contrary to what US posters insist on believing, it is a v.common thing in the UK. if you've noticed it more in recent weeks, that's purely to do with EOY lists and the idea that anyone, anywhere, enjoys the music of that harpy and generally terrible person elly jackson.

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, December 27, 2010 2:07 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

that may be, but on ilx it looks like you used it about 4 times in late '09/early '10, and then in the last month used it about 6 times, on multiple occasions going out of your way to explain it...it's just a teensy bit obnoxious is all.

some dude, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

i have never heard this expression b4

plax (ico), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

suzy appears to be the other person on ilx who likes to say it, i guess she's british too right? (xpost)

some dude, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

SAMPSON
Nay, as they dare. I will kiss my teeth at them;
which is a disgrace to them, if they bear it.

Enter ABRAHAM and BALTHASAR

ABRAHAM
Do you kiss your teeth at us, sir?

SAMPSON
I do kiss my teeth, sir.

ABRAHAM
Do you kiss your teeth at us, sir?

SAMPSON
[Aside to GREGORY] Is the law of our side, if I say
ay?

GREGORY
No.

SAMPSON
No, sir, I do not kiss my teeth at you, sir, but I
kiss my teeth, sir.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

how is "kmt" obnoxious and "rmde" isn't - at least people outside of ilx use the former

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

people on ilx generally use rmde as kind of a joke/reference, and i was certainly using it ironically in this thread

some dude, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

seriously. VERY common expression: http://twitter.com/#search?q=kmt

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ how many of those are about eastenders btw

plax (ico), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

my point isn't that it's inherently obnoxious, or that it's not common in some circles, but that your recent usage of it has been a bit over the top

some dude, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

i guess its some sort of lameo eastenders type slang? carry on

plax (ico), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

Can we get back to talking about music?

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

my point isn't that it's inherently obnoxious, or that it's not common in some circles, but that your recent usage of it has been a bit over the top

which differs how from all the shit memes that everyone else on ilx partakes in, from "amirite" to "rmde"? all of which have been making me cringe for years

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

amirite isn't an ilx thing tbrr

markers, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

imo

markers, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

well congratulations, you are finally getting ur own back. p sure up until this point everyone loved all ur posts

plax (ico), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

how i will miss the amiable and non abrasive lex of old

plax (ico), Monday, 27 December 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

lol!

The Reverend, Monday, 27 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

whadimiss?

69 65 51 46 (Ioannis), Monday, 27 December 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

same shit different day iirc

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 27 December 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

loool

markers, Monday, 27 December 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

Interns don't have to check the points anymore. We have computers now.

Also, the tiny number of math errors are trivial compared to the massive piles of word/letter/field-order errors.

Personally, I vote all-metal these days, even though I still also make a non-metal list for my own site, because my metal list is an order of magnitude better informed than my non-metal list. Sure, I've heard Kanye and Taylor Swift, too, and so of course I have my own opinions about those, but what I haven't done, and don't have time to, is listen to 100 other things like Kanye, and 100 other things like Taylor, so I would have some basis for saying whether those albums are actually standouts or watered down popularizations of their forms or whatever. Whereas in metal my opinions are no less subjective, but at least they're a lot less arbitrary. I *have* heard 100 other things like Agrypnie or Agalloch.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 5 January 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Results are up:

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

Many familiar names in the comments as per usual...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

haha yeah

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

Results utterly unsurprising too.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

don't have time to read essays yet but the upper echelons of both lists make me wonder how many critics confused "popular" music with "good" music.

on the plus side, "wut" came 33rd in the singles poll O_O

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

yawn at the results

Algerian Goalkeeper, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

Get in here, goons

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/RmxvY2thdmVsaQ==/

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

and in here http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/TGFzdCBUcmFpbiB0byBQYXJpcw==/

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:56 (fifteen years ago)

LMFAO

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/singles/2010/TGVtbWUgU21hbmcgSXQ=/

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 23:59 (fifteen years ago)

lol

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

54. Antoine Dodson & the Gregory Brothers, "Bed Intruder Song"

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

i was the sole voter for half my singles and three of my albums

"lemme smang it" was on my longlist. p&j really really should think about having ballots of 20

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

M.I.A: ouch.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

and in here http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/TGFzdCBUcmFpbiB0byBQYXJpcw==/

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:56 PM (

ha -- if it helps, one of my published comments nodded towards it.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

lol i think literally every single p&j voter is a current or past ilm poster

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:14 (fifteen years ago)

of dirty money i mean

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:14 (fifteen years ago)

Assuming Brad Nelson is the same one who posts here, the only one I'm not sure about is Tyrone Palmer.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:20 (fifteen years ago)

Real Life Is No Cool got 11 votes? WTFFFFF.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

Revenue Retrievin' gets three Goon votes (whiney, deej, and myself). And a vote from Noz. And maybe the others are Goons too, but I don't recognize the names.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:25 (fifteen years ago)

Real Life Is No Cool got 11 votes? WTFFFFF.

Five of whom are former Stylus and current Pitchfork guys (it made my final twenty).

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

lol -- earl tied yelawolf

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:29 (fifteen years ago)

Real Life Is No Cool got 11 votes? WTFFFFF.

Five of whom are former Stylus and current Pitchfork guys (it made my final twenty).

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:27 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

And two Jukeboxers, including myself, if I'm not mistaken.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:34 (fifteen years ago)

so who wrote the good essays? who wrote the bad ones?

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:39 (fifteen years ago)

did the Diddy album deserve better?

gospodin simmel, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

Juzwiak's essay is terrific.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

so who wrote the good essays? who wrote the bad ones?

― hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:39 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its been up for 20 minutes. why don't you give it some time instead of treating everything like a kanye leak, you fuckin spaz

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

lol the fuck's your problem? i was just asking what ppl thought of the essays. i'm sure some ppl have read a few of them. jesus.

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

lolz and all, i know, that but that's a lil harsh, whiney

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

i'll let you know when zach baron's essay leaks in 320 kbps tho

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

sorry if it was harsh. it was for the lols.

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeaa i figured... it's just not very lolsy.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

These are the strangest Pazz and Jop results ever. Broooooce down at #25?? Taylor Swift #26??? M.I.A. #35?? I thought critics ate that shit up! What happened??

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ the diddy massive

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

Assuming Brad Nelson is the same one who posts here, the only one I'm not sure about is Tyrone Palmer.

― Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:20 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dunno if he wants to out himself but this is an ilxor

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

p obvious tbh

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

who's david moore, if he doesn't mind me asking?

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

tyrone palmer did a couple of jukebox reviews once but didn't seem to stick around

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

These are the strangest Pazz and Jop results ever. Broooooce down at #25?? Taylor Swift #26??? M.I.A. #35?? I thought critics ate that shit up! What happened??

The stranglehold on the top 10 has been successfully passed from Rolling Stone/Spin-era dinosaurs to Pitchfork/Stereogum-era small furry animals. With no discernible improvement in overall quality.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

i've no idea who t.palmer is on ilx

david moore is @cureforbedbugs (same on tumblr), hasn't posted on ilx in a while but used to be dabug

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

;_;
http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/SmV3ZWxyeSBTZWxlY3Rpb24=/

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

Ever since I stopped voting in this, I can't help looking at the list and trying to determine how I would've shaken things up. At the very least, I would've gotten Owen Pallett into the top 100, Steve Reich into the top 1000, and The-Dream ahead of Das Racist. Also would've been the only person to vote for William Brittelle (maybe Jaga Jazzist, too).

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

maybe this will get cassie to follow me on tumblr http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/singles/2010/U2t5ZGl2ZXI=/

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

dunno if he wants to out himself but this is an ilxor

― *gets the power* (deej), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:47 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

p obvious tbh

― zvookster, Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:48 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Ha, I was actually going to say, "Maybe it's zvookster." But it seemed like an arbitrary joke, so I didn't.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol no not me

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

geez even i can figure this out

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

ugh @ dream losing to das racist

not that i helped it lol

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc i'll sell his identity to you

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc's xls has seen better days

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/TG92ZSBLaW5n/

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

oh duhhhh it's totally obvious who tyrone palmer is

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

God these essays are so fucking smug. Apologies if any of the writers are ilxors, but please mellow out.

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

I've figured it out. (He posted the ballot upthread.)

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

i fully expect r. juzwiak's essay to be excellent. looking at the subjects and the writers, i have no intention of reading any of the others apart from the bieber one (maybe clover hope's, too). the others will 100% guaranteed make me want to kill.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

ilx is totally calling tyrone right now

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc's xls has seen better days

I don't read a lot of the threads the dude posts on, so I don't really have a bead on his taste.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

really surprised at the lack of votes for The Fives single

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 00:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.villagevoice.com/2011-01-19/music/rick-ross-lies-the-rolling-stones-plunder-and-taylor-swift-triumphs/3/

haha alfred's last comment here. man, you & nate patrin are in the running for having diametrically opposite philosophies w/r/t music vs. myself

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

if a the national song no one has heard places top 10 in pazz and jop, does it make a sound?

flopson, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

ariel pink fans dont really get 70s studio rock, dude?

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

(xp)

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really care much for that National album, but it's a pretty good song.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

haha alfred's last comment here. man, you & nate patrin are in the running for having diametrically opposite philosophies w/r/t music vs. myself

music makes the bourgeoisie and the rebels

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really care much for that National album, but it's a pretty good song.

"Afraid of Everyone" and "England" were my jams.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:02 (fifteen years ago)

it's just kind of weird that it placed below both katy perry singles. not that this should be the metric by which things are judged, but like at most one millionth of the people who heard teenage dream/california gurls have heard bloodbuzz ohio no exaggeration

flopson, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

The National album is good, even very good, but it's not the aesthetic that I like best on them. None of its songs are among my fave National songs.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

theres a lot of stuff im surprised didnt get votes ... jamie woon's night air only got three for ex ... ive never felt further from what ppl were voting for

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

<3 you all that voted for this:

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/TmV2ZXIgTWluZCB0aGUgQnVsbGV0cyBIZXJlJ3MgRWFybHkgQm9iIFNlZ2Vy/

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

Katy Perry fans spent the money to the money to the money that they spent

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

i was the only vote for ikonika's album, that surprised me

i was gonna say i hadn't heard that national song but apparently i reviewed it at the jukebox! 4/10. not a good song.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

i'm shocked that people can tell National songs apart enough to vote for one

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:06 (fifteen years ago)

^"Bloodbuzz Ohio" is the one that sounds like all the other ones but better.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

kind of annoyed that big boi prevented a clean sweep of dislike for BOTH top 10 tracks and albums

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

how much worse can the others be? :/

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

Listening to "Bloodbuzz, Ohio" again. Seriously, like the worst song on the Grinderman album is better than this wussy-poo beardlice mcsweeney subscription old man clam-chowder-fart of a song

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

xp How I feel about the worst of them is how I imagine you feel about 90% of guitar-based indie rock with male vocals.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

New York or New England? The latter is creamier. xp

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

Not that this will recommend it to anyone not otherwise disposed to it, but the rhythm of "Bloodbuzz Ohio" reminds me a bit of Final Fantasy's "This Is the Dream of Win and Regine."

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

What I don't like about High Violet is that it basically forgoes verses for a focus solely on hooks, which is fine, just not the best look for The National.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

Like, people who actively enjoy the National know that like punk rock and hip-hop and heavy metal and stuff happened like 30 years ago to make sure that we can all listen to other shit besides Dan Fogelberg, right?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:17 (fifteen years ago)

I think Kanye was such a critical smash because he’s the only person more insecure than a rock critic.

Christopher R. Weingarten
New York, NY

haha. comments v much in character

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:18 (fifteen years ago)

i wish other critics wouldn't propagate that horrible, self-loathing image of critics as being insecure and awkward ;_;

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

Like, people who actively enjoy the National know that like punk rock and hip-hop and heavy metal and stuff happened like 30 years ago to make sure that we can all listen to other shit besides Dan Fogelberg, right?

thank god for these brave, lost soldiers. . .

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

also fuck you, the nat'l.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

(i kind-of agree with WGW on this, tho . . .)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

i wish other critics wouldn't propagate that horrible, self-loathing image of critics as being insecure and awkward ;_;

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:19 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark

whiney thinks we're all lonely, hermetic, anti-sexual and anti-sport.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

Still waiting for Ariel Pink to sound like Boz Scaggs.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure I can even name a Dan Fogelberg song, but Whiney's comment makes me want to mount a long impassioned defense of Dan Fogelberg.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

whiney thinks we're all lonely, hermetic, anti-sexual and anti-sport.

fucking indiecentrism again

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

xp And I don't even like the National that much!

Just hate the idea that music needs to be aggressively dynamic to have value.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

yes

omar little, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

Still waiting for Ariel Pink to sound like Boz Scaggs.

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:21 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and because it doesnt, indie ppl 'dont get it'?

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

i wish other critics wouldn't propagate that horrible, self-loathing image of critics as being insecure and awkward ;_;

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 6:19 PM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark

sorry if my joke inadvertently insulted the sexy, worldly baller playboys spending their tuesday nights pondering about where Girl Unit placed on a critic's poll

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

ya jeez whiney I have semi-regular sex with a real girlfriend. #y'alldon'tknowme

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

women be shoppin

omar little, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

lol self-loathing

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

sorry if my joke inadvertently insulted the sexy, worldly baller playboys spending their tuesday nights pondering about where Girl Unit placed on a critic's poll

spending my tuesday night deadline-surfing ;_; but also still recovering from my sexyworldlyballerplayboy weekend

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

and because it doesnt, indie ppl 'dont get it'?

Cheap copies of Middle Man and Silk Degrees available at Amazon.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

spending my tuesday night deadline swag-surfing

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

1146 The Fives (ft. Vanya Taylor), "It's What You Do (The Hottest by Far)" Mentions: 1

F*ck y'all (except deej).

Tim F, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:30 (fifteen years ago)

and where was YOUR ballot tim

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

Frank Kogan voted for Daddy Yankee's Mundial. Now that is something I'd actually be curious to read his comments about. (Steve voting for it is less of a surprise to me.) Those were the only two people to vote for my third favorite album of the year (and my favorite DY album, of those I've heard).

_Rudipherous_, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

I wasn't invited this year.

Tim F, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

Presumably because I would have smacked some sense into proceedings.

Tim F, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

almost certainly an oversight? i emailed rob h myself when i wanted to be invited last year.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

NO ONE VOTED FOR "WATAGATAPITUSBERRY" SO FUCK THIS POLL.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

I'M OUT.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)

did the #2 single "Tightrope" chart anywhere? afaict it didn't crack any Billboard chart but maybe there were some other countries it charted in -- if not, it's easily the highest P&J single ever to have not charted.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, did Frank Kogan actually vote for Marina & the Diamonds? Is that for real? I thought he hated her. I'm suddenly ready to hug Frank Kogan, for those two votes.

_Rudipherous_, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

Cheap copies of Middle Man and Silk Degrees available at Amazon.

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:29 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i own silk degrees, its really not a perfect album by any means. i probably like as many songs on the ariel pink as i do on that, maybe more. i dunno, your argument seems to imply they're going for something i dont think they're actually going for

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

did the #2 single "Tightrope" chart anywhere? afaict it didn't crack any Billboard chart but maybe there were some other countries it charted in -- if not, it's easily the highest P&J single ever to have not charted.

― some dude, Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:33 PM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

did shutterbugg either?

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

i love "Watagatapitusberry" but i never really thought of it for my top 10, partly because i like the DJ Class song the beat came from better and partly because i feel like it might be poor form to vote for one of my Baltimore friends

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

"Shutterbugg" lightly scraped the charts

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

shutterbugg:

Chart (2010)↓ Peak position↓
UK Singles Chart[8] 31
UK R&B Singles 13
U.S. Billboard Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles 20
U.S. Billboard Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs 60
German Black Charts [9] 8

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:35 (fifteen years ago)

like i said, strangest p&j results evah

Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:37 (fifteen years ago)

did the #2 single "Tightrope" chart anywhere?

Not as far as I can tell.

It looks like Monae's only charting single is something called "Open Happiness" (with Cee Lo), which in 2009 hit #11 in Austria and #29 in New Zealand.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:38 (fifteen years ago)

do we have a dedicated Watagatapitusberry thread because this my first exposure to it and

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:42 (fifteen years ago)

In the 1300-word comment I sent in, I wrote, "I fully expect to have heard no more than two of the top 10 Pazz & Jop albums, and a maximum of five of the top 20."

Actual tally: three from the top 10 (LCD Soundsystem, Janelle Monae, Black Keys), total of four from the top 20 (Jamey Johnson).

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:42 (fifteen years ago)

Official Watagatapitusberry Thread (¿¡EL QUE!?)

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:44 (fifteen years ago)

xpost have you gotten a good start on not listening to music in 2011?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:44 (fifteen years ago)

Do you have any new favorite albums you haven't heard that we should not look out for?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:44 (fifteen years ago)

Highest-placing thing I voted for: Rick Ross, #34.

I usually have at least three albums on my ballot that nobody else voted for, and this year those were Ayumi Hamasaki, Flesh Consumed and Kill the Client.

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:47 (fifteen years ago)

based on the name alone, i'm ready to list kill-the-client as my favorite record of 2010.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:48 (fifteen years ago)

unperson: wrong ayumi album

abcfsk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 01:49 (fifteen years ago)

Really surprised Roc Marciano did so well. I wasn't aware that album was that well-known.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:01 (fifteen years ago)

wrong ayumi album

I turned in my ballot before Love Songs came out. But either way, Circus stomps all over it.

If anybody wants to read the whole rant I sent in (as opposed to the little bits they used, one of which appears verbatim upthread), here you go.

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:03 (fifteen years ago)

"bloodbuzz ohio" is okay but the idea of voting for a "single" by the national is slightly hilarious and very foreign to me

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:08 (fifteen years ago)

decidedly NOT goon-rock

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:09 (fifteen years ago)

it's just very weird to me, the idea of listening to a singular song by that band

and ppl that voted for that AND the album need better imaginations

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:10 (fifteen years ago)

I'm the opposite: I enjoy their moments more than their sequences. I voted for "Mistaken For Strangers" in 2007 when the album bored the hell out of me.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

lol this comment where the dude is all "taio cruz's 'dynamite' is as popular as some random hannukah parody from youtube. how modern." is hilarious and wrong

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

That's ILX's own NoTimeBeforeTime.

Pink Friday XIII (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:13 (fifteen years ago)

ha! if i would've known that i would've addressed him directly

anyway i don't agree w/ that comment, notimebeforetime -- altho big ups for liking "dynamite," which made my ballot

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:14 (fifteen years ago)

its a youtube with 300,000 views. its a single guys. its the internet era this is how it works

― ich bin ein ilxor (deej), Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:49 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

damn, my man soto went ham in the comments

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

blam blam

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

dynamite is the best song of the year

flopson, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

Naw, but it's up there.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:19 (fifteen years ago)

this is dire, obv

fruit of the goon (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:23 (fifteen years ago)

it wasn't my #1 but i think i was being slightly facetious/strategic

flopson, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:23 (fifteen years ago)

simon's been lurking:

"For 2010 wasn't the Year of Chillwave so much as the Year of Chillwave Backlash, a flurry of jibes almost as formularized as detractors make out the music to be: obligatory reference to Hipstamatic + snigger at the name + invocation of nostalgia as a priori Bad Thing = entire region of music dismissed."

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

^^^A guy who doesn't know aaaanything about dismissing entire regions of music out of hand.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

Uh, that's Simon, not Scott, to be clear.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

someone give whiney a trophy

flopson, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:33 (fifteen years ago)

Data deconstruction is here:
https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

If you gus like stats then Glenn did these also! https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=ILM-Metal-2010&query=Winners

Needle is awesome!

Algerian Goalkeeper, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:36 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha nice one Glenn! https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=2010+Metalism

Algerian Goalkeeper, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:37 (fifteen years ago)

I am not too surprised to find that I'm one of three people whose whole singles ballot shares no other voters. I thought there was at least a tiny chance somebody else might vote for "The Prolonging", but no.

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&thread=%4043493&typeId=9149585060559937602&render=List

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:42 (fifteen years ago)

Amazing work on this as ever, Glenn McDonald, great fun sorting through it all.

Mark, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:45 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ kanye being #35 album when u discount ppl who didn't submit a singles ballet ("Hipness"). not sure what that means but it means something.

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)

err ballot wtf

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 02:48 (fifteen years ago)

What Mark said. Thank you, glenn.

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

lol at ryan schreiber's being the fifth most centrist ballot

j., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:20 (fifteen years ago)

also funny how agalloch comes out at or near the top of almost all of the variant albums charts.

j., Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

Said this last year:

The fact that Ryan Schrieber is the 5th-most centric voter says everything you need to know.

― i'd look psychotic in a baklava (The Reverend), Tuesday, January 19, 2010 6:21 PM Bookmark

Although I don't think this year's results are as bad as 2009's.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

i think its actually a pretty weird and interesting list of stuff. i would listen to stuff on that list. its very young. or seems young. which i like cuz sometimes pazzjop could be a real snooooooze. did all the old people die?

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, I was the only vote for Christian Mistress? Really?

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:35 (fifteen years ago)

Although I don't think this year's results are as bad as 2009's.

― The Reverend, Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:32 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

eh they're pretty dire

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

Said Senior Senior (me) to Junior Senior (Skot); hooraw,we ain't all dead yet!

dow, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

genuinely shocked whip my hair is so low placed

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

also, surprised no toot it/boot it support:
http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/singles/2010/VG9vdCBJdCBhbmQgQm9vdCBJdA==/

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

i think its actually a pretty weird and interesting list of stuff. i would listen to stuff on that list. its very young. or seems young. which i like cuz sometimes pazzjop could be a real snooooooze. did all the old people die?

I'm guessing that the success of kanye/big boi/cee-lo/janelle is in big part because younger critics and older critics are much more likely to agree about which (semi)popular black music is good than in any other area.

NB. emphasis on use of word "critics" above.

Tim F, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 03:51 (fifteen years ago)

its a youtube with 300,000 views. its a single guys. its the internet era this is how it works

― ich bin ein ilxor (deej), Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:49 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

― domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:15 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

how is this statement relevent to this thread
please explain

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

lol my centricity closest to jordan, al, noz and brainwasher

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

can't believe yours was the only vote for "lay it down"

fruit of the goon (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

why? it's not like any other non-crossover R&B hits did well, especially one that broke so late in the year.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:15 (fifteen years ago)

im confused about the definition of 'crossover' any moer

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:16 (fifteen years ago)

yeah "can't believe" was the wrong phrase

fruit of the goon (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

"Lay It Down" was top 10 on the R&B chart, but didn't get on the Pop 100 or into the top 40 of the Hot 100. if you think that's crossover, then what isn't?

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:20 (fifteen years ago)

i should clarify that i mean my conception of what has or has not crossed over is confusing

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

fair enough.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 04:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://i54.tinypic.com/2rc9yu1.jpg

markers, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 06:46 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's funny that titus andronicus did so well in the "world with only kanye" tabulation

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 07:26 (fifteen years ago)

so who is making the world of ilmers tabulation?

symsymsym, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 09:23 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't that what the ILM year-end poll is for?

Dance the Bot! (seandalai), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:58 (fifteen years ago)

I know it's hardly a shock that Kanye won but I can't be the only one who's surprised that he DOUBLED the number of points of the #2 album, with ONE-THIRD of the total number of respondents voting for him?? That's insane!

lol this comment where the dude is all "taio cruz's 'dynamite' is as popular as some random hannukah parody from youtube. how modern." is hilarious and wrong

I never said it was "as popular", I said that the original + the covers were all lumped together in my mind when I thought about the song. And that wasn't a hindrance, I actually found myself liking the song even more. Anyway, it's a great song and all that.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:18 (fifteen years ago)

I just realised that four out of my top 5 albums of 2010 don't feature at all in the P&J list - and the fifth one only got 4 mentions. I'm pretty sure I've never been this much out on a limb before. :/

Jeff W, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:51 (fifteen years ago)

huh http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/critics/2010/2266610/

bort, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

You always use your ignorance of pop music as a pole to raise your flag upon. Like, I can't fault anyone for not caring about Adam Lambert, I'm faulting you because you constantly think it's grounds for bragging rights.

Fuck YeAaAAHH Chris!

cee-oh-tee-tee, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

Glad to see Brainwasher in there.

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

you guys all polled out or something? thought this thread would be all nutso and filled with indignation or whatever. that other poll thread must have taken the fight out of everybody.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Unperson may believe that this is now the era for genre specialist critics and not generalists, but per usual there aren't that many genre specialists voting for many genres(various forms of r'n'b old and new--XChuck and I may be the only Southern soul voters and we did not even agree on which Malaco or Ecko release was best; various Latin genres; only a few votes for Nigerian King Sunny Ade or Malian Khaira Arby; Unperson and others can discuss how many metal critics voted). As was discussed last year (and or the year before) some folks who write about such genres are just not interested in taking part in a poll dominated by pop and Pitchfork favorites (which is too bad).

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

xp I was wondering that too! But it's hard to be indignant when you know what's coming. Pazz & Jop is just a big anti-climax these days. Guess I was surprised by Kanye having three singles in the top 10 (all in a row, too!), but I probably shouldn't have been.

Me, I'm just happy that five people voted for Bob Seger and five people voted for Chely Wright.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

only Southern soul voters

I should have directed Rob Harvilla to Daddy B. Nice's website! Maybe next year. He'd have the best ballot in the whole poll.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

I also want to brag that, despite being one of the few voters ever to (sort of) write an entire book about the genre, my Glenn McDonald "metal" rating has now stood at a perfect zero for three years in a row. (Though actually, in both 2008 and 2009 I voted for one metal single, so seems like I should've got half a point then, at least.)

Also, Todd Kristel and I somehow voted for five of the same singles this year! Plus the Traband album, which nobody else named.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

I know it's hardly a shock that Kanye won but I can't be the only one who's surprised that he DOUBLED the number of points of the #2 album, with ONE-THIRD of the total number of respondents voting for him?? That's insane!

P&J voter pool is large enough, and popular music fractured enough, to invoke rank-size distribution?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank-size_distribution

bendy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

after all this time and all this acclaim i'm STILL not curious enough to hear the kanye album. not flaunting ignorance, i've just never enjoyed his stuff and i can't imagine that this album is SO GREAT that i would like it. i think he just reminds me of p diddy and i can't stand him either.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

new p diddy album is amazing too fwiw

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

new p diddy album is amazing too fwiw

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

The Diddy album is really good. I think if it had come out in October it would have placed at least 100 spots higher than it did.

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

otm

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

the release date for it was bizarre, but i'm still kind of shocked that it isn't a bigger deal. there was literally one copy at my record store when i bought it, less than two weeks after it came out.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

The Diddy album is really good. I think if it had come out in October it would have placed at least 100 spots higher than it did.

I may cheat and stick it on next year's ballot.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

i believe that they are good. they just both bug me so much...

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

It might make mine.

xpost

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

so its really just more of a personal problem...

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

are there other flashy rap moguls you prefer or just not your type of guy?

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

xp I might do that with Yelawolf. (Vote for it in 2011, I mean. Looks like it made 10 ballots this year.) Also belatedly liking El Debarge, R. Kelly, and Kandi, to varying degrees. Still need to check out the Diddy. And Daddy Yankee. And Christian Mistress. And lots of other things.

I did listen to the Kanye album. All the way through! Honest! It's....okay. I guess. Also gave two of those three top-ten singles 6's out of 10's on Singles Jukebox (skipped "Monster" at the time for some reason.) So they're definitely not horrible.

Most amusing tabulating error I've noticed so far (not criticizing -- I ran the poll for years, and a few are inevitable): One of the votes for M.I.A.'s "Born Free" appears to actually be Hobey Echlin's vote for "Born Free" by Kid Rock. So if you start at Echlin's singles ballot and click on "Born Free," it seems like the Kid Rock song got 20 votes.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

The Diddy album is like Exhibit A on why people shouldn't fill out their ballots in October and then post WHAT ELSE IS THERE TO HEAR, REALLY?!

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

based on the Kanye showing i don't think many people actually did that

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

unless they put him on their ballot before hearing the whole album, which i can believe

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

i didn't know kandi had a new album!

nov/dec were bizarrely full of quality releases - i know the pop/r&b calendar is usually weighted towards the run-up to xmas, it just seemed particularly noticeable this year. diddy, ciara, jazmine, yelawolf, el debarge, r kelly, keri (and yeah kanye and rihanna too, though i didn't like either).

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, 3 of my top 4 albums were from Nov/Dec

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

Is this the second year in which indie albums released in the first half (if not the first couple of months) dominate? In 2009 and 2010: Animal Collective, Dirty Projectors, Vampire Weekend, Beach House, the National...

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Half of the albums in the top 10 were released in May, and three of those on the same day:

Jan. 11
Vampire Weekend

Jan. 26
Beach House

May 11
The National
Sleigh Bells

May 18
LCD Soundsystem
Janelle Monae
Black Keys

July 5
Big Boi

Aug. 2
Arcade Fire

Nov. 22
Kanye West

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol this is probably the most "me" P&J I've ever seen

Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck: OK, I tagged White Wizzard and Sister Sin, so your Metalism score isn't 0 anymore.

The "Born Free" thing is not a tabulating error: the counts are correct for both songs. But the Voice's pages that *list* the voters for each song aren't accounting for same-name songs by different artists, so both MIA's 20 and Kid Rock's 1 lead to a page with 21 voters listed. But this is correct in the Needle version:

MIA: https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&thread=%401816&typeId=9149585060559937610&render=List
Kid Rock: https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&thread=%401354&typeId=9149585060559937610&render=List

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

The M.I.A. essay's second paragraph is fucking hilarious

Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

just noticed that i plummeted from 354th in 09 to 568th this year in terms of centricity

my "empathies" (nice word!) -

0.151 · 8 · Frank Kogan · 2010
0.131 · 7 · Chris Herrington · 2010
0.129 · 7 · Al Shipley · 2010
0.129 · 7 · Jordan Sargent · 2010
0.128 · 7 · Tyrone Palmer · 2010
0.108 · 6 · Tom Ewing · 2010
0.105 · 6 · Jonathan Bradley · 2010
0.091 · 4 · Ben Sisario · 2010
0.088 · 4 · John Milward · 2010
0.081 · 5 · Kasia Galazka · 2010
0.08 · 5 · Andy Kellman · 2010
0.08 · 5 · David Cooper Moore · 2010
0.078 · 5 · Alfred Soto · 2010
0.061 · 4 · Calum Marsh · 2010
0.06 · 4 · Richard Torres · 2010
0.059 · 4 · Jer Fairall · 2010
0.059 · 4 · Nick Neyland · 2010
0.059 · 4 · Amrit Singh · 2010
0.059 · 4 · Renato Pagnani · 2010
0.058 · 4 · Ross Raihala · 2010

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

My comments, for what they're worth.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

"are there other flashy rap moguls you prefer or just not your type of guy?"

diddy and kanye are pretty much the ONLY rap artists/producers/etc that i kinda can't stand. they're jerks. i can't even listen to puffy-affiliated music cuz i'm always afraid that he might say something on a track and ruin it for me.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

and they say there's no ilx hivemind...

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

they're jerks.

don't u listen to burzum?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

not really.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

you should.

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

maybe he finds varg's psychotic hatred fascinating but kanye's jerkiness off-putting

Mordy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

i listen to the eagles though.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

ok, you're beyond all hope then.

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

there is SOOOOOOOO much rap music in the world that is better than the stuff those two dopes make. i've never felt the need to listen to kanye or puffy. but, yeah, when everyone raves about their new albums i DO get curious. i'm a curious guy. but never curious enough to actually listen.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

mostly they just make me cringe when i see them on t.v. and i've had to see them on t.v. FOREVER. or it feels like it anyway.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

...may as well give up on tryin ta stab that beast with yer Steely Dan knives and wot naught.

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

i love the eagles! and henley and frey are world renowned odious monsters. what can i say, there are exceptions.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

Don Henley is the very devil we must all bend knee for. \m/

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

Hail Donald!

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

Joe Walsh is really nice though! So he kind of balances the jerks out.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

scott is officially not buy-curious about kanye or diddy.

beta blog, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

weighing in as someone who didn't vote in P&J, the results do seem a bit yaaaaawn/predictable/lolkanye.

speaking re: my tastes, there are two albums i LOVED in the top ten (big boi, janelle); three that i liked alright, but wasn't crazy about (kanye, lcd, sleigh bells); two that i heard and didn't care for (arcade fire, black keys); and two that i never heard in full b/c i'm not in any way interested in the various singles & youtubes i've heard of theirs (vampire weekend, the national).

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

i'd love to hear the diddy album, btw, as soon as i find the deluxe version w/ bonus tracks for less that fucking $16.99

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

less than*

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

if the singles are any indication, i would hate the new puffy

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

Artists who excel at talking out of their ass can get a boosted a few steps above their artistic merit, just for being fun to write about, amirite? Elvis Costello would have filled Kanye's role in this circa 1980. John Lennon in 1970. Chuck D in '89. Eminem around 2000. Opening paragraph- done.

bendy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

they're not; i disliked or was indifferent to the early singles and ended up adoring the album (xpost)

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

Singles — Votes For U Smile (800% Slower by Shamantis)

Michael Azerrad
Andy Beta
Jakob Dorof
Daniel Durchholz
Kevin John
Mike Rowell
Gabe Vodicka

looooooooool

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

i wish there was mention of where each voter currently writes; i'd probably start following a good # of writers based on interesting ballots alone (and perhaps unfollow a couple others?)

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

Not to change the subject, but has anybody explained when and why critics suddenly started loving Black Keys so much? Aren't they doing pretty much the same thing they always did? (Their single. which finished #20 was slightly reggae, I guess, but if anything it seemed like a step down to me.) So is it just that commercial radio suddenly started playing them more, or what? Almost positive this is the first time they've had either an album or single finish anywhere near this high, and they've been around for years.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

"empathies"

0.131 · 7 · Andy Kellman · 2010
0.108 · 6 · Mallory O'Donnell · 2010
0.092 · 5 · Ian Latta · 2010
0.062 · 4 · Jessica Suarez · 2010
0.062 · 4 · Judy Berman · 2010
0.062 · 4 · Candice Jones · 2010
0.062 · 4 · Stephen Thomas Erlewine · 2010
0.061 · 4 · Philip Sherburne · 2010
0.059 · 4 · Jeff Weiss · 2010
0.057 · 4 · Barry Bruner · 2010

I think I like this site more than P&J itself

Dominique, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

Also still seems funny to me how Nick Cave was ignored by Pazz & Jop people for decades -- I bet the Birthday Party never got more than a couple votes -- but now he's almost an automatic Top 20, with or without Grinderman. (Okay, I'm not positive where his last albums placed, and too lazy to check. But #15 for the new Grinderman must be something like his lifetime peak, after 30 years.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

So is it just that commercial radio suddenly started playing them more, or what?

I think they do have a higher profile this time around, for whatever reason. The album debuted at #3, "Tighten Up" is currently #1 on the Billboard rock singles chart, they were on SNL recently, etc.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

And holy shit, speaking of senior-citizen pigfuckers, I just noticed the Swans album finished 29th!! They've never come close to the Top 40 before, I don't think.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

xp Got a few Grammy noms, too, it looks like.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

i read that each of the 6 Black Keys albums sold more than the one before it, so i imagine they've just gradually and consistently built their following and raised their profile.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

has anybody explained when and why critics suddenly started loving Black Keys so much? Aren't they doing pretty much the same thing they always did?

i think it's just bigger exposure/fanbase = more votes. they've kinda spiraled downward in recent years, going from a more gritty sound with interesting, punchy songs with fun bluesy hooks... to zzzzzz blues-influenced indie rock.

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

current electorate grew up on his shit = welcome to the top twenty, Nick

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know any of empathies.

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

xpost, see also Tom Waits

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

new Swans is their best ever near as i can tell.

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

was gonna say Tom Waits.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

i don't get the sense from the younger acts on the list that that many voters 'grew up' on Nick Cave tbh

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

Highest finishers I never heard of until today: Sharon Van Etten at #42, then Women at #44, then Jonsi at #49, then Emeralds at #50. (Okay, maybe I should've been paying closer attention to them, who knows. I only heard of The Tallest Man On Earth -- #40 -- because we did one of his singles on the Jukebox a few weeks ago. I gave it a 3.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

Also: a lot more guys my age have become Black Keys fans than I would have expected.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

and Tom Waits did good on P&J in the '80s, not just more recently xpost

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

The Black Keys had a very substantial year with their music in commercials and cable programming. Their tunes were all through engagement ring/jewelry advertising during the holiday season. They have the theme music for Hung. And I have no idea how much movie tuneage they've been tapped for but it must be a good deal.

Gorge, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Tallest Man on Earth is the highest finisher I'd never heard of, though I've heard of all the other ones you've named. (Jonsi is the singer from Sigur Ros, fwiw.)

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

every generation gets the rolling stones it deserves.

a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

Hallelujah really moved "she tied you to a kitchen chair" type songwriters closer to the center.

bendy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

BK are kinda boring live honestly; sounds like the same song over and over

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

I thought I was the only Pazz & Jop voter to watch Hung, though! (And I mainly do just because it's partly set in my old high school.) I've also heard Black Keys on Sons Of Anarchy, though, come to think of it. (I wouldn't know about commercials, because I pretty much watch everything on Netflix. But yeah, if they're that exposed these days, that might explain it I guess.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.seinfeldscripts.com/images/seinfeld1.jpg

who are these people?

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/albums/2010/U2lnaCBObyBNb3Jl/

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

They're sort of like the Pogues, but with everything that was ever any good about the Pogues taken out. (Also: Big Country, maybe. But folksier.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

Caitlin Dewey
@caitlindewey Syracuse, NY
Journalism student moonlighting as a blogger and music critic. Tweets on cupcakes, music, magazines and all things SU.

buzza, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

I've been aware of the Black Keys for years, but they didn't win me over until this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PrT25o8Vs

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

#15 for the new Grinderman must be something like his lifetime peak

Actually come to think of it one of Cave's solo albums might've gone Top 10 when I was running things. (Not my fault.) But it had taken him something like a quarter-century to even make the Top 40 for the first time. And now he's an automatic shoo-in.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

Highest finishers I never heard of until today: Sharon Van Etten at #42, then Women at #44, then Jonsi at #49, then Emeralds at #50.

oh how i long to live in a jonsi-free world ;_;

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

Just walk down the street and be amazed at how many people have never heard of him, and look at you funny for bringing him up.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

when did the black keys last change labels? i assumed it was a label/new management thing.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

If I'd cast my non-metal ballot, Jonsi would have been on it. For me that, the Goldfrapp album and the School of Seven Bells were a related trio of great shimmery, joyous pop albums. Or what I mean by "great shimmery, joyous pop", anyway.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

one of the bigger surprises to me was The Roots sneaking into the top 20 for the first time in 8 years with an album that didn't seem any more acclaimed than the the 2 before it, which feels maybe a symptom of low consensus and/or enthusiasm this year.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

my empathies. i hate all these people:

Empathies (Weighted) 20
0.061 · 4 · David Raposa · 2010
0.059 · 4 · JJ Lang · 2010
0.058 · 4 · Jonah Wolf · 2010
0.038 · 3 · Marvin Lin · 2010
0.036 · 3 · Ben Donnelly · 2010
0.027 · 2 · George Smith · 2010
0.025 · 2 · Brandon Stosuy · 2010
0.025 · 2 · Sam Hockley-Smith · 2010
0.018 · 2 · Dan Weiss · 2010
0.017 · 2 · Jayson Greene · 2010
0.017 · 2 · Jesse Fox Mayshark · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Chuck Eddy · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Tal Rosenberg · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Ian Cohen · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Keith Harris · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Thomas Britt · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Ben Westhoff · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Jordan Sargent · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Abe Beame · 2010
0.016 · 2 · Al Shipley · 2010

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

Black Keys are fucking HUGE among a certain subset of college kids that are almost sort of into jam bands, but scared to fully commit. I saw one of their NYE shows here in Chicago and I was shocked to learn they played three sold-out nights at the Aragon.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

Okay, apparently I lied about never having heard of Jonsi. Turns out I gave one of his singles a 1 out 10 back in March, then scrubbed it from my brain. (Rock Critics Are The Art Of Pretend Forgetfullness Thread, here I come again.)

http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=2025

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

For those of you scrutinizing the Empathies lists, note that there are separate ones for ballots and voters. Each ballot's empathies are the most similar ballots from that same same year, while each voter's empathies are the most similar voters considering all albums/songs/artists from the three years whose data I have in Needle...

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I should add an Apathies, which lists the people whose opinions you most probably don't give a shit about.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

x-post, I thought Whiney was asking who are these voters for Mumford & sons. Randall Grass used to write about reggae and r'n'b for the Voice I think back in the early '80s (and maybe worked at Shanachie). Roy Trakin's been writing that long too.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

xp on jonsi - "The monotonously pounding beat, twee-glitch flute and Jónsi’s near-incomprehensible castrato warble (I wasn’t immediately sure this was in English) should likely mark this as more insufferable than it is, but for a somewhat generic uplifter destined to inevitably become a Nissan commercial, it somehow totals to more than charming."
ford explorer actually, but who's counting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l95UgzWWn-Y

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

i never should have voted for waka. i'm surrounded by friggin' goons:

Abe Beame · 2010
Al Shipley · 2010
Andrew Nosnitsky · 2010
Ben Detrick · 2010
Ben Westhoff · 2010
Christopher R Weingarten · 2010
David Drake · 2010
Ian Cohen · 2010
Jayson Greene · 2010
JJ Lang · 2010
Jonah Wolf · 2010
Jordan Sargent · 2010
Sam Hockley-Smith · 2010
Scott Seward · 2010
Tyrone Palmer · 2010

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

I liked the Jonsi album both times I played it, then promptly forgot all about it. But that's the way I am with Sigur Ros; every time I see ( ) in my CD tower, I'm like, "Oh yeah, I own that," then I go listen to something else. But when I saw them at Radio City supporting that record, they were great.

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

first year in awhile I've heard the #1 single.

J0rdan votes in this?!? damn, it is so much harder being a film critic.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

Pretty much exactly what unperson says, I remember liking the Jonsi record but never found a reason to go back to it. The only Sigur Ros I've found myself wanting to hear again is that Med Sud... one because it wasn't as dour as the old stuff.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

xp price of metamucil is too damn high, it's true

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

good faux-J0rdan joke

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

one of the bigger surprises to me was The Roots sneaking into the top 20 for the first time in 8 years with an album that didn't seem any more acclaimed than the the 2 before it, which feels maybe a symptom of low consensus and/or enthusiasm this year.

Could Jimmy Fallon have anything to do with this?

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno, the Max Weinberg Seven never placed on P&J

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

Did the Max Weinberg Seven ever release an album?

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

http://images2.fanpop.com/images/quiz/65558_1222129819495_473_352.jpg

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

Roots was Christgau's album of the year, fwiw -- which used to have a residual effect on certain other people's Pazz & Jop ballots, though I'm not sure it would anymore.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, it's not like the Roots were suffering from lack of visibility (at least among critics), but now they're suddenly on national TV five nights a week. Just figured fans of the show might be more likely to give How I Got Over a spin even if they'd ignored the last couple of albums.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

it's possible. but i feel like that bump would've been detectable in the sales or reviews of the album 6 months ago if that were the case.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

all love morbs

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

I was gonna say the last two or three Roots records blew it out of the water, but i conveniently forgot How I Got Over existed

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

they sample joanna newsom

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

The Roots got 33 votes for Game Theory, 25 for Rising Down, 50 for How I Got Over. I'd make some cynical comment about the guest artists on each one of those albums but

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

just putting it out there. we're allowed mention fallon but hands off indie

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

Different topic, here's Glenn on his Needlebase site:

Here's the album chart re-sorted by Hipness, which is a glib label for the percentage of an album's points that came from people who filled out the singles section of their ballot. It has been suggested that grumpy old people do not vote for singles. This table does not dispel that notion.

Except: Ke$ha finished first. And I'm pretty sure lots of grumpy old people voted for her. (I definitely qualify, and I fill out a singles ballot every year. Also Frank Kogan, J.D. Considine, Josh Langhoff, Rob Sheffield, and probably some others whose ages I don't know.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

they sample joanna newsom

Confused why the credits say "ft. Joanna Newsom" as though she were in the studio.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

The last two don't come close to Game Theory (not that I voted for any of the three).

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

xpost, that happens like all the time on rap records, not just ones that have indie rock people on them

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

ppl do that when they want to cash in on the name

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

Ha ha, Ke$ha's empathies:

0.188 · 3 · Shakira · She Wolf
0.171 · 3 · Britney Spears · Circus
0.14 · 5 · Taylor Swift · Fearless
0.134 · 6 · Lily Allen · It's Not Me, It's You
0.128 · 5 · Lady Gaga · The Fame/The Fame Monster
0.12 · 3 · Rihanna · Rated R
0.118 · 5 · Rick Ross · Teflon Don
0.116 · 2 · Ashlee Simpson · Bittersweet World
0.116 · 2 · Dolly Parton · Backwoods Barbie
0.116 · 2 · Jace Everett · Red Revelations
0.116 · 2 · Scooter · Under the Radar Over the Top (The Dark Side Edition)
0.104 · 4 · Ne-Yo · Year of the Gentleman
0.104 · 5 · The-Dream · Love Vs. Money
0.103 · 2 · CSS · Donkey
0.098 · 4 · Brad Paisley · American Saturday Night
0.092 · 2 · Danity Kane · Welcome to the Dollhouse
0.092 · 2 · Marina and the Diamonds · The Family Jewels
0.083 · 2 · Bob Seger · Never Mind the Bullets Here's Early Bob Seger
0.083 · 2 · Foxboro Hot Tubs · Stop Drop and Roll!!!
0.083 · 2 · Madonna · Hard Candy

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

Seger sadly not among Ke$ha's influences.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

"tend" to not vote for singles, I said. As with most statistical observations, this doesn't necessarily say anything about any individuals. There are certainly grumpy old people who vote for singles. I vote for singles, and my ballots have no pop in them at all. And presumably there are some supercool hipsters who only vote for albums. But the overall trends emerge despite exceptions in both directions.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

I think part of the reason why The Black Keys seems to be getting more and more popular might have to do with their music -- however good, shitty, stagnant, indie, etc. -- penetrating new fanbases. I might be wrong about this, but I think they've been embraced by older classic-rock fans, the post-Alligator blues world and the whole jam band universe. Just a guess though...

QuantumNoise, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

I thought I was the only Pazz & Jop voter to watch Hung, though! (And I mainly do just because it's partly set in my old high school.)

I watched most of the first season. My wife was in the background of a scene in the first episode.

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

think part of the reason why The Black Keys seems to be getting more and more popular might have to do with their music -- however good, shitty, stagnant, indie, etc. -- penetrating new fanbases

Indeed. When you're music is backing for Zales you've reached into the very middle bleeding heart of the US soppy sentimentality from young to old. Attsalottapeople. Was going to mention it on Rolling Hard Rock but didn't because I got the impression I was the only one of the regulars who watch cable TV.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=Black+Keys+commercial+zales&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=

Gorge, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Btw, the Old Farts Who've Criminally Never Placed In Pazz & Jop album that I was really hoping might place this year (even though I didn't vote for it myself), the Fall's Your Future Our Clutter, tied for 180th. (Which, for all I know, might be the best they've ever done. Though I wouldn't be totally shocked if, say, This Nation's Savings Grace finished in the Top 200 or so way back in 1985.) If Nick Cave and the Michael Gira can do so well in their old age, why not Mark E. Smith? I don't get that.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

Less consistent touring of the US (thus getting less media attention)

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

You might have a point there.

In other Old Farts Probably Peaking news, Ratt's new album tied for 365th, named on four ballots. Bet that's never happened before.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

You don't think Ratt placed back in the 80s?

that's not funny. (unperson), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

Appetite For Destruction was pretty much the only hair metal album to place in P&J in the 80s (unless you count Aerosmith's Pump, I guess)

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

Did anybody vote for Sade in the 80's? (#74 this year) Their album got 26 mentions and just 160 points -- that's got to be near or at the very bottom of the enthusiasm rankings ...

... just as I was writing this, I realized that the VV's numbers are incorrect. The list shows 26 voters and 160 points (although when you click on the album you see that only 17 people voted for it), but Glenn's numbers appear correct with 17 voters and 151 points (and a lower ranking!) And FWIW, the enthusiasm score is fairly low (20th out of 119 albums with 10 or more votes).

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

Sade's debut LP placed 14th in 1985.

And no, Ratt never even came close -- Not even with "Round And Round," which may or may not have gotten any singles votes in 1984. (Pazz & Joppers did like Van Halen that year, though.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

Some dude's right, though -- basically, no hair-metal except for GnR placed in Pazz & Jop the '80s. Not Def Leppard, not even Bon Jovi's "Livin' On A Prayer" as a single. (Though, by the end of the decade, that one was showing up on certain magazines' best-of-'80s singles lists. The year it came out, critics -- including me -- mainly just considered it something to make fun of.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

Sade were #31 in 1993 too ... I had no idea. Also, it bears repeating: the 1985 albums list is weird (I think there's a thread about it).

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

Daughtry will finally scrape the bottom of P&J 2021 with an album of Nick Cave interpretations. "Red right hand, yeauh..."

bendy, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

The year it came out, critics -- including me -- mainly just considered it something to make fun of.

In Top 100 that has a top 100 starring bearder mewling morons Mumford And Sons, rapegaze sensations Salem and completely devoid human cokefart Ke$ha, is there any music that critics can agree to make fun of anymore?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

Like even stuff like The Fray/Daughtry/Sick Puppies we mostly just ignore

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

ford explorer actually, but who's counting

omg just hearing 30 sec of jonsi in that commercial makes me want to destroy music. feel like i'm on some lex-level white indie ppl w/ guitars level of hatred steez here ^__________^

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

Re Sade counts, the Voice is in the middle of getting the 2009 carryover votes in, and at the moment the 9 carryover votes for "Soldier of Love" the song are getting erroneously double-counted for the album of the same name. It'll be fixed. As you noted, these are all right in Needle...

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

any music that critics can agree to make fun of anymore?

ICP?

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

Strip-club grunge?

QuantumNoise, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

Nickelback.

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

No lie, I will take any ICP album over Mumford and Sons

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

Or their collabo, "Little Lion Bitch"

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

imo there's a lot less 'popular music critics might make fun of' in P&J now than there was 10 or 20 or 30 years ago

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Can we talk about how Scott Plagenhoef said his fave album of 2010 was “My iTunes playlist of James Blake’s 2010 collected works” in early Decemeber

http://www.theawl.com/2010/12/nearly-one-hundred-peoples-top-album-of-2010

And how a month later that's an option on Pazz&Jop that charted in the top 100?

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

has P&J ever counted multiple distinct releases with different titles that haven't been packaged together for retail as one entry before?

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

did you end up picking that harvey milk as yer fave whiney?

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

lol did they all really vote for "James Blake, The Bells Sketch/CMYK/Klavierwerke EPs"?

i see old ilxor geeta is among their number

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

has P&J ever counted multiple distinct releases with different titles that haven't been packaged together for retail as one entry before?

I'm not sure I believe that every one of the 74 people who voted for Robyn on the album ballot voted for Body Talk; I would've thought at least one person would've specified one of the three EPs rather than the catch-all compilation.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just glad I don't have to be the guy making these decisions anymore -- it gets more and more confusing! I doubt all the people who voted for Cokefart's Animal mentioned Cannibal, either; ditto for the Gaga's Fame and Monster last year, though eventual tallies might imply otherwise. Plus, lots of these albums probably have various extra-track versions available at different retailers, not all of which everybody voting for them would approve of. But I guess it's the same as what Pazz & Jop has been doing with singles for years, where alternate mixes count as part of the record's total (except when they don't.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

Still, bundling up individual votes for distinct EPs as one "release" does sound kind of sketchy (says the guy who gave 30 points to a 111st-placing album that doesn't actually exist.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

has P&J ever counted multiple distinct releases with different titles that haven't been packaged together for retail as one entry before?

I'm not sure I believe that every one of the 74 people who voted for Robyn on the album ballot voted for Body Talk; I would've thought at least one person would've specified one of the three EPs rather than the catch-all compilation.

― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:35 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

they're all called Body Talk, though, hence the "different titles" specification

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, in the James Blake case there were a variety of votes for different combinations of those EPs (single, doubly and triply!), so we decided to combine them. There was some similar combining for variations of Body Talk, as you guessed, and for Animal/Cannibal. Similarly for The Fame/The Fame Monster last year. In all these cases there were some votes *for* the combinations, and there was no good way to split those, so it seemed better to combine than to leave the votes semi-artificially fragmented among different configurations.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

Presumably this applied to Yelawolf too.

Tim F, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

e-40 kinda like that too although they were also sold together (with a t-shirt)

currensy probably suffered from this i imagine, but those were pretty distinct releases anyway

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

these are totally distinct releases. even curren$y at least had the same name tho it's pretty much the same thing to group them as one

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

Yes on Yelawolf and E-40, no on Curren$y. Nobody explicitly voted for Pilot Talk and Pilot Talk II together, whereas in the Yelawolf and E-40 cases there were some combined votes. If you're really curious, there's a view of all the corrections I made this year here:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=All+Corrections

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

Eminen W Phianna

markers, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

this seems like a rather un-contentious year for pnj.

maybe we can make some hay out of the james blake thing. not too many blake fans on ilx right?

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

currensy probably suffered from this i imagine, but those were pretty distinct releases anyway

ke$ha animal/cannibal was pretty distinctly different imo -- weren't they released like 10-11 months apart??

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ glenn's worksheet of corrections

the person who voted for "My Beautiful Dark Twitsed Fantasy" perhaps took the "twisted" part a bit too literally, no?

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

they were also released together as a deluxe edition of the former, not unlike The Fame Monster. (xpost)

some dude, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

and, like, if you're voting for "My Beautiful Dark Twisted" or "My Beautiful Dark Secret Fantasy" or even "My Beautiful Dark Twist Fantasy" and can't even proofread yr fxcking ballot, you are too dumb to vote imo

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ "LCD Soundsystem - This Is It"

the strokes reborn a decade later via james murphy... too telling

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

Yeasayer - Odd Blodd

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

ah i see, there was one triple vote and one double vote re the blake EPs. kind of an odd thing for those voters to do but not alas some widespread lockstep voting technique

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

Deerhunter - Halcyon Dreams

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

Needle finds most of the simple typos for me. The real pain in the ass is people who fill out the ballots backwards, reversing album/artist or song/artist. Even those I can find pretty easily in Needle if there are correct-order votes to match them up with. But a special circle in my hell is reserved for people who don't read the instructions AND vote for things nobody else has ever heard of, so I have to look them up one by one to find out whether they're backwards or not. I'm looking at you, Todd Burns.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

animal/cannibal came out in one deluxe edition

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

Right, so did Fame/Monster last year.

I definitely saw some ballots last night that still had artists and titles, or even labels and titles, transposed. (In their singles, at least.) But like I said above, a few of those, in my experience, are inevitable.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

And although I really enjoy doing this, I'll say that the peak of my enjoyment doesn't come at the moment when I'm looking up how many fucking "Na"s there are in "Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na)".

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, a few reversals got fixed today after people pointed them out; none affected anything that had more than 1 vote. Happy to fix anything else anybody can point out to me!

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha xp

zvookster, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

Nax12 iirc

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

man, i'm totally gonna spend and hour looking for the most egregious typos now

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

whiney i got u covered already dawg

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

And although I really enjoy doing this, I'll say that the peak of my enjoyment doesn't come at the moment when I'm looking up how many fucking "Na"s there are in "Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na)".

― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:14 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol Al

*gets the power* (deej), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

man, i'm totally gonna spend and hour looking for the most egregious typos now

candidate ^^

ilxor, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

The only thing that would really mess up those Gaga and Ke$ha votes would be if somebody voted for both of them, separately, and their points were combined into more than the max 30 points. But I don't know if that happened. (Jimmy Draper listed both Gagas separately last year, iirc.) Of course, it's possible somebody voting for Animal might not like Cannibal much, but I'm not sure what you'd do about that if most other people are voting for them together, and they were commercially available that way.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

What actual working critics are the ones putting album titles in quotation marks?!

domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

Billboard's style is to put album titles in quote marks, so they look the same as singles! I hated that when I was there.

In Martin Popoff's metal book, he italicizes song titles and bold-faces albums. It made my blood boil for a while, but I'm used to it now.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, I check for those duplicate votes, and for various other point abuses, intentional or accidental. Computers, man. They're really good at counting.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

i forgot votes would get carried over from last year - hurrah i technically voted for "soldier of love" and "try sleeping with a broken heart" here too (i think).

i guess i admit that in placing ciara's basic instinct as my #1 album of the year, i was absolutely also thinking about the stuff that emerged by her (some official, some leaked) in 2010 that didn't make the album. though even that is better than arbitrarily bundling up 4 separate releases into one - all of that ciara material is at least connected to the album (ie released by her as a trailer for it, or recorded during the sessions for it, or whatever)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

Sleigh Bells - Ring Ring

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't Nelson George vote for Kelis' Tasty in '03 AND '04?

Andy K, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

If so, his '03 votes wouldn't have been subtracted from the '04 carryover totals. (That definitely happened a few times when I was there, but I'm not sure about George with Kelis.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

Would have been subtracted from the '04 carryover totals, I meant (like all duplicate votes.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

A pedant writes: I'm pretty sure Exile on Main St. is correct (as opposed to Exile on Main Street, as it appears in the poll) and B.o.B should be written without the final period, ie. not like this: B.o.B.

Position Position, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 23:59 (fifteen years ago)

Pedantry cheerfully accepted.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 00:14 (fifteen years ago)

The earlier problems with Soldier of Love, and with links leading to combined voters for same-named things, have both been fixed in the Voice's version now.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

when i click on some of the songs on my ballot it doesnt list my name as having voted for them i.e.
http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/singles/2010/VG9wIHRvIHRoZSBCb3R0b20=/

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

Fyi Glenn, the 2010 Billboard Songs links to the 2009 list.

The Reverend, Thursday, 20 January 2011 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

Deej: refresh your ballot-page and then try again. Looks like you were trying to follow links from before the samed-name fix I mentioned above. If that still doesn't work, post the link to your page so I know who you are, and I'll look.

Thanks Reverend, fixed that.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

still doing it. i cleared the cache even.

d@vld dr@k3

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, well, that's simple: all the links from ballots to albums/songs are broken at the moment. Pretty sure it's still a result of the fix for same-name things, but it's broken on the server side, not yours. I'll let them know. In the meantime, you can use the version I control, which works:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&thread=%4022504&typeId=9149585060559937602&render=List

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 01:53 (fifteen years ago)

A Voice blogger gets wonky about Pazz & Jops present and past

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2011/01/the_six_most_de.php

Having spent the last two weeks poring through Pazz & Jop 2010, I've learned everything from the two albums most statistically similar to a bootleg compilation of early Bob Seger (those would be Flockaveli and Ke$ha's Animal/Cannibal combo) to the number of writers who ended their comments with an ironic "Get off my lawn!" (surprisingly, only two). As fun as those pieces of information might be, the most significant statistic this year remains the record-setting margin by which Kanye West's My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy won the albums poll.

xhuxk, Thursday, 20 January 2011 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

did my vote for flockaveli somehow connect it with the bob seger comp? cool!

scott seward, Thursday, 20 January 2011 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

The math knows not why, it just knows "is".

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

The Voice now has a blog post from me about data analytics: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2011/01/pazz_jop_stats.php

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

omg kanye looks coked outta his f'n mind in the main p&j photo

http://media.villagevoice.com/5872541.0.jpg

ilxor, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://media.villagevoice.com/5872541.0.jpg

ilxor, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

dang it's not workin

ilxor, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

ahhh here we go:

http://media.villagevoice.com/5873726.87.jpg

ilxor, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHmYXvO8hQI

children of the church planters (Edward III), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

FUCK

i quit

view here: http://www.villagevoice.com/2011-01-19/music/kanye-west-wins-one-for-the-douchebags

ilxor, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

idgi

because his eyes are open?

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

pazz and jop is the worst thing about music criticism and ilx should have nothing to do with its elitist, canon-chewing fuckwaddery

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

-_-

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

cocaine use usually involves dilated pupils, or at least glassy eyes, correct _or_ incorrect?

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Look everyone, it's LJ!

Matt DC, Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

on a slightly related note, kanye west and james murphy are artless, boring hacks

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

cocaine apparently involves holding your breath so you look all froggy

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

actually dude I'm pretty sure you're the artless, boring hack here, since you can't seem to come up with anything new to say, ever

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

oh burn

maybe you should look at the threads I contribute positively to (most of them) and not the ones I fight the familiar fight on

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

half the time your positive contributions make no sense because you talk about music as if it was a tool for bolstering your credibility rather than a fantastic thing that should be enjoyed in savored in as many different guises as you can consume it

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

watch it guys or else I'm going to poll BLANK (Boi/LCD/Arcade/Nat'l/Kanye)

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

3 out of 5 of those are very good to fantastic

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

didn't you say that about GAPDY?

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

probably; I don't actually mind it when a lot of people like the same thing I like

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

half the time your positive contributions make no sense because you talk about music as if it was a tool for bolstering your credibility rather than a fantastic thing that should be enjoyed in savored in as many different guises as you can consume it

absolutely fuck you.

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

that's a horrible thing to say and yeah I'll say it again: fuck you.

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

(i'm lying; you only thought YYYs were v. good -> fantastic)

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

LJ you like Vampire Weekend?

(honest question)

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

fuck you right back

I'm very tired of your rampaging thoughtless ego shitting up every fucking thread I want to read

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

christ and to think I actually engaged you on that Kokayi album which nobody else has seen fit to comment on

DN is a John Justen inspired joke

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

you are a decent person but you still need to learn when to shut the fuck up

Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

some serious pot/kettle shit going on there

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

this thread has several hundred posts and I've popped on with my two cents - and that's shitted up the whole thread? wtf

although really p&j only reinforces stuff we already know so anything could be said here and it would change nothing

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://candyaddict.com/blog/candy_images/kit_kat_gimme_a_break.jpg

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

contenderizer otm

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, make slurs about me wanting only to talk about music in a way that shows how cool I am when I have a decidedly unfashionable taste and a habit of proselytising stuff I like - trying to get others on board, being inclusive etc - just, wow.

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

sorry LJ I wd back you up but I haven't heard the new Kanye or LCD...

what are the albums/songs on this year's p&j that you actually do like? I don't think I know what you were digging this year at all except for Y.F.O.C.

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

pazz and jop is the worst thing about music criticism and ilx should have nothing to do with its elitist, canon-chewing fuckwaddery

lol pretty sure I discovered ILM by googling something like "2002 pazz and jop."

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

big boi, titus andronicus, caribou, swans, four tet, neil young, agalloch, pantha du prince all had their moments without blowing me away, and none got on my 25 for the ilxpoll, at which point we exit the top 100

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

need to hear that zs album mind

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

mildly annoyed that they conflated all the robyn eps with each other

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

2010 P&J albums doesn't get to stuff i'm surprised and happy to see until around 70th place: sun city girls and marnie stern. fuck ya. also zs, ty seagal, glasser, fresh & onlys, ludicra, earl sweatshirt as we toddle off into the 100s. sun araw wuz robbed.

what's the deal with the sharon van etten record on ba da bing? don't think i heard anything about it...

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

lj, christ, take some meds. you are no fun at all lately bro.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 20 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

take some meds

you're really helping! jeez

actually I'm not posting to most of ILX's high-traffic boards at all atm so I'm not really much of anything - but today is a bad day fine w/e

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

yo i hear some jagger stuff just popped off

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

pazz and jop is the worst thing about music criticism

Curious as to what's the best thing.

clemenza, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

@Discographies

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

@discographies is the fucking worst, i've called it the death of criticism and meant it

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

HI HAVE SOME SNARKY CONSENSUS-BASED RECEIVED WISDOM THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO ACTUALLY LISTEN TO THE MUSIC OR THINK ABOUT TO LOL AT

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

fucking fucking hate it so much, would punch that dude in the face, wish people would cease RTing the cunt

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

You don't like their lastest one?

Mariah Carey: 1-13 "One, but the lightbulb makes horrible squealing noises and has a publicist who won't let you photograph its left side."

prolego, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

RT

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

RTing the cunt

coming 2011 on Turquoise Jeep Records

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

i didn't even see that last one omg kill

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

haha

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

HI HAVE SOME SNARKY CONSENSUS-BASED RECEIVED WISDOM THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO ACTUALLY LISTEN TO THE MUSIC OR THINK ABOUT TO LOL AT

Yeah but lex he/she's mostly talking about stuff that's old rock music you hate and outright dismiss.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Coldplay: 1-4 "Imagine a sturdy, comfortable walking shoe (in focus-group tested shades of beige) gently tapping on a human face — forever."

nothing wrong with this one at all

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

the thing about it is that most ppl just aren't very funny \(o_O)/ -- sorry, @discographies

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah but lex he/she's mostly talking about stuff that's old rock music you hate and outright dismiss.

well yeah often i don't disagree, and a lot of the time it's snark at the expense of acts i hate myself, but it's based on such lazy, uncritical precepts.

that coldplay one's a good example - i h8 coldplay. i've only heard one of their albums all the way through BUT a) based on that limited knowledge i could easily dismiss them w/that conclusion because it's boring received wisdom based on what "we" "all" "think" - NOT based on actual critical thought; b) even with my limited knowledge i can tell that coldplay's aesthetic has changed in more interesting ways over the years than implied in that completely uninsightful sentence - it tells me absolutely nothing about coldplay that i don't see parroted all over the place already.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

lex i think the account is mostly for laffs, not cutting critical insights -- it's just not that funny, mostly cuz your part about parroted wisdom (which is mostly the point i guess, but still)

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

altho anyone saying "rock critic of the year!" is outright trolling

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

i like coldplay & i lolled at that one tbh

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

@Discographies is for people who think Whiney's twitter reviews are too in-depth.

polyphonic, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

lex i think the account is mostly for laffs, not cutting critical insights -- it's just not that funny, mostly cuz your part about parroted wisdom (which is mostly the point i guess, but still)

yeah it was just a mild "eh, don't like that" until i saw every fucker RTing every dribble of non-insight and then people actually seriously calling the cunt "critic of the year" and then him getting a NYT profile out of it, and at that point it's just like YOU NEED TO DIE BEFORE THIS GOES ANY FURTHER.

and yeah it's absolutely unfunny. not that comedy is anything anyone should aspire to smh.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

lex's vendetta against "comedy" is really underrated in the canon of lex's vendettas

hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

must be an british thing

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, i don't live there, it's possible none of those people are funny?

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

I was surprised at his rant against comedy on that other thread. Had no idea he hates comedy and comedians.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

I'd had a sneaking suspicion he had no sense of humor before that.

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

my hatred of comedy surpasses my dislike of indie by far - at least indie gets it right very occasionally. comedy is conceptually abhorrent to me.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

this is an amazing development

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

yet not altogether surprising...

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

wait lex you hate comedy???

like...all comedy?

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

like caddyshack?

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

knock knock joeks?

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

fake dog poop?

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

how did you go so long w/o seeing one of my anti-comedy rants?! all comedy, apart from maybe a soft spot for the old friends episodes i watched as a teenager. stand up comedians are even worse than tv comedy. british comedy is the very worst of the lot.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

(I just want to clarify: I blew one Frank Kogan "comment" (basically just a NO vote to a particular Marina & the Diamonds track) way out of proportion, possibly associating him with the general tone of Marina & the Diamonds comments on the Singles Jukebox. He hadn't had much bad to say about her.)

_Rudipherous_, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait any comedy that gets scatological is the worst. DNW

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

lex loved paris hilton's album so he's clearly fronting

vampire weekend fan (acoleuthic), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait any comedy that gets scatological is the worst. DNW

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:04 PM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

You're a real whizz at posting and you'll always be number one to me.

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

I donnnu how I went so long without seeing it. I suppose I just never read the right threads, I honestly was surprised you hated all of it, I know you dislike the british public so thought you might hate big comedies like only fools & horses or blackadder or the young ones or porridge. Or not have even seen Steptoe & Son, Rising Damp, Dads Army et al. But to hate all comedy, and to say you hated it more than INDIE really came as a shock.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

love that m@tt's roll call of funny things he can't believe lex doesn't like is a) caddyshack b) knock knock jokes c) fake dog poop

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

lolling @ that list

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

ranked in terms of funny -- fake dog poop >> caddyshack >>> knock knock jokes

*gets the power* (deej), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

i saw caddyshack a few weeks ago and it wasn't as funny as I had been led to believe

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

what abt that photo with the guitar, that was a gag u seemed to be enjoying

zvookster, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

all comedy, apart from maybe a soft spot for the old friends episodes i watched as a teenager.

okay seriously not sure which is worse, lex's irrational hatred of comedy or the fact that fucking Friends is the only exception he might allow!

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

love that m@tt's roll call of funny things he can't believe lex doesn't like is http://www.davetaylorelectric.com/images/spencer_gifts.jpg

― some dude, Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:17 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

great store, i buy all my south park shirts there

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

Lex's hatred of comedy is one of his most appealing traits (but I'm moderately anti-comedy myself).

_Rudipherous_, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

i wish we could do like a comedy "what not to wear" episode where we give Lex $5000 to buy a complete new wardrobe at spencer gifts

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

lex is kinda otm...there's a lot of comedy that blows...

but do you find anything funny lex? like do you think ILX is funny? cuz I think it's frequently hilarious...

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

i'm down with people giving me $5k for whatever reason (nb don't know what style of clothes spencer gifts deals in, have horrible feeling there's a catch here)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

i love laughing and find many things funny. i have many amazing friends and acquaintances who make me laugh all the time. but comedy as a thing repulses me. as i said on the other thread, the idea of paying someone to make me laugh is akin to paying someone for sex, to me.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

ever watch porn?

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

Here ya go, Lex:

http://www.spencersonline.com/

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

well, never paid for it

down with calling comedians the equivs of porn stars and whores tho

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

would also hate comedy if I lived in england fwiw

iatee, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.spencersonline.com/images/spencers/products/processed/02097475.detail.a.jpg

"does anybody remember laughter?"

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone knows Spencer's! Yea, Spencer’s – lava lamps, fart machines and funny gifts. Funny, Spencer’s has all that but so much more, you’ve got to check it out to believe it. Spencer’s has unique gift ideas for any and every occasion, so if you need birthday gift ideas, bachelorette party paraphernalia, gifts for dad, cheap gifts, cool gifts or cool T shirts, Spencer’s has it covered. Get gifts for friends, family, and don’t forget to treat yourself!

Spencer’s gets any party started with funny gifts and gag gifts, corporate gifts to motivate, romantic gifts to stimulate, personalized gifts to appreciate and so much more. Bring on the bachelorette party, find unusual wedding gifts, rock the bachelor party, crack up a gathering or make your point with funny T shirts; break the ice without breaking the bank when you discover cheap gifts and cool gifts at Spencer’s. Spencer's offers a variety of unique gifts and gag present ideas that range from family friendly to R rated to Adults Only.

Just looking for a laugh? Have fun with a gag gift from Spencer’s – from the Insulting Parrot to the Shocking Pen, Spencer’s does funny gifts right. Spencer’s is the place to go for funny and unique gift ideas for any occasion or just for fun. Wanna pimp your room? Check out Spencer’s for blacklights, lasers, posters, curtains and more – who knew you could find it all at Spencer’s online store? Feeling romantic? Spencer’s has the luv stuff to put you in the mood and keep you going, from the Carmen Electra dance pole to Playboy accessories, sex board games and fun sex toys. Oh boy!

Spencer’s – from funny gifts to unique gifts, Goth gifts, girl gifts, sexy stuff, sporting stuff and rockin’ room décor, Spencer’s has it all, and more. Check it out!

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

:(

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

from the Insulting Parrot to the Shocking Pen

There is stupid beauty in this phrase.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

hey lex, what about paying someone to make music you enjoy? what's the distinction?

anyway, i'd never encountered lex's comedy-hate before, but it doesn't surprise me. i hate most comedy myself, but i'm not the type to go all in and say, "comedy is LOATHESOME!" lex is, so he naturally does.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes i feel dirty after watching a professional comedian who's been paid to do that disgusting thing they do, but i'll be honest, sometimes i really want to laugh and my wife's asleep and none of my funny friends want to come over and hang out.

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

Spencer's = a good place to buy marijuana-themed T-shirts iirc

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

man some of the shirts on spencer's site are more horrific than i could have imagined

dj plain ole m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

Top Sellers
# Star Laser
# Under Bed Restraint Syst...
# Beer Pong Table - 6.5 Ft
# 52 Ounce Lava Lamp
# View All >

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

I like watching stand-up on Comedy Central and stuff like that, but I have to admit: a disproportionate amount of the worst things in the world are comedically-based.

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes i feel dirty after watching a professional comedian who's been paid to do that disgusting thing they do

i sometimes feel dirty while or after watching comedy because comedy is so fundamentally desperate, and the desperation of comedians is so evident and so gruesome. desperation to be liked, to be heard, to not fail miserably. it gives me anxieties. plus the misanthropy and self-loathing that most comedy seems to disguise...

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

yes, but finding 85% of comedy to be horrible /= finding the entire idea of comedy loathsome

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

i sometimes feel dirty while or after watching comedy because comedy is so fundamentally desperate, and the desperation of comedians is so evident and so gruesome. desperation to be liked, to be heard, to not fail miserably. it gives me anxieties. plus the misanthropy and self-loathing that most comedy seems to disguise...

YES SOMEONE GETS IT

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah music is NOTHING like that

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, for everyone's edification:

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/NewAnswersControllerServlet?boardid=40

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

Bah.

Spencer's Gifts

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

haha someone really does not get it

check some dude's quote again...

goole, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.spencersonline.com/product/fartonator-value-pack1/

http://www.spencersonline.com/product/fake-dog-poo-poo1/

When I was a primary school kid there was a joke shop in Hamilton that used to sell fake dog poo. I think every boy in my class bought one.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

rmde

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

(no offense, AG, I guess I never got it)

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

rubbing my dogshit eagerly

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

what im saying is ,that it was funny when you were 7 or 8.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

so how about those pazz and jop results?

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

not as good as the ones from the fart machine

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

xpost -- We've moved beyond that. What are your 2011 choices?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

not as good as the ones from the fart machine

― Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:50 PM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Cee Lo Green prefers to be called the SOUL machine, thank you very much

Dan Watagatapitusperry (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

whiney made a funny!

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

and geir likes to be called the sex machine but it aint ever gonna happen

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

think geir has settled for just the "machine" part

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h279/juicyfrt/Splinter1990movie.jpg

whiney made a funny!

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

this thread took a turn for the weird

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 20 January 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

You kids get off my lawn.

Interesting stats tidbit: Florence & the Machine's "Dog Days Are Over" has gotten votes three years running. 1 in 2008, 4 in 2009 and 13 in 2010. All different voters, too. Maybe 2011 will finally be their year.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

nah I think "Dog Days Are Over" days are over

some dude, Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

terrible song

markers, Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

i sometimes feel dirty while or after watching comedy because comedy is so fundamentally desperate, and the desperation of comedians is so evident and so gruesome. desperation to be liked, to be heard, to not fail miserably. it gives me anxieties. plus the misanthropy and self-loathing that most comedy seems to disguise...

YES SOMEONE GETS IT

― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 20 January 2011 20:44 (3 hours ago) Bookmark

I had been thinking that lex's anti-comedy stance and anti-indie stance were probably at root derived from the same impulse, and now here's proof.

Tim F, Thursday, 20 January 2011 23:57 (fifteen years ago)

except that contenderizer is one of the biggest indie dudes around these parts.

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 21 January 2011 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

(along with me of course)

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 21 January 2011 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

makes u think

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

Yes but contenderizer doesn't think that indie is "fundamentally desperate... to be liked, to be heard, to not fail miserably" or is characterised by "misanthropy and self-loathing", whereas lex does on both counts.

Tim F, Friday, 21 January 2011 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

joanna newsom is def misanthropic:

We speak in the store
I'm a sensitive bore
You seem markedly more
And I'm oozing surprise

markers, Friday, 21 January 2011 06:20 (fifteen years ago)

"fundamentally desperate... to be liked, to be heard, to not fail miserably" or is characterised by "misanthropy and self-loathing"

That's Kanye, right?

Not surprised he won, of course, but baffled at the margin. I still fucking hate it on several levels.

Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 21 January 2011 06:57 (fifteen years ago)

Lex hates Kanye too obv.

Tim F, Friday, 21 January 2011 07:01 (fifteen years ago)

But of course.

That description is like an astrology reading for anyone in the entertainment business, though. Actors, singers, comics, even footballers.

Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 21 January 2011 07:10 (fifteen years ago)

some artists try to make a virtue out of their desperation and self-loathing though.

(i actually don't hate kanye! MBDTF is the first kanye album i dislike. though it's unquestionably been a steady downwards slope.)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 08:17 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah tim is right about anti-comedy and anti-indie being related.

nick would you call beyoncé misanthropic and self-loathing lol.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 08:18 (fifteen years ago)

i'd laugh but don't want to contribute to the evil comedy bourgousie

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Friday, 21 January 2011 12:19 (fifteen years ago)

From YouTube to sharity blogs, the Internet is an ever-expanding data sea, and these young musicians are really explorers, voyaging into the past and diving for pearls. Like the real ocean, it's full of flotsam, garbage, kitsch. But sometimes the plastic turns out to be the pearls. The paradigmatic move here is Oneohtrix-man Dan Lopatin's prising apart of Chris DeBurgh's sickly ballad "Lady in Red" to release the sliver of sublime that is "Nobody Here" (one of numerous "echo jams" he deposited on YouTube).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RFunvF0mDw

http://4gifs.com/gallery/v/Dramatic_Alpaca.gif.html

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 January 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/176503-2/Dramatic_Alpaca.gif

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 January 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

I wrote a piece about the P&J singles poll and it's gradual move away from focusing on chart hits:

http://www.splicetoday.com/music/the-village-voice-s-pazz-jop-poll-skips-pop-hits

have a bunch of statistics re: hits on the singles poll that I'm working with glenn to get online for people to peruse.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

deej likes this

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

i tried to tumbl it but tumblr is down, yet again

im about to just str8 up quit that site

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

haha every time i hear about tumblr being down i'm like yeah maybe i'm glad i never rushed to get in on that

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Echoing both of you.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 January 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

great piece, some dude. one quibble: are artists like big boi, robyn, and kanye really in the same category as arcade fire and the national? none of them had massive chart hits last year, it's true, but i'm not sure it's fair to accuse "tightrope"/"dancing on my own"/"power" voters of not engaging with pop music as a genre (though indeed they might not be engaging with popular music as measured by charts).

swvl, Friday, 21 January 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

i wasn't equating them, obviously they're all different artists with different degrees of mainstream success. but the fact is "Tightrope" is on the list as much because of blogs and not radio spins as "Bloodbuzz Ohio."

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

and it's not a rock vs. rap thing or an indie vs. major thing. Arcade Fire sold more than Big Boi.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

the fact is "Tightrope" is on the list as much because of blogs and not radio spins as "Bloodbuzz Ohio."

yeah, that def makes sense. i guess my only point is that many of the people voting for "tightrope" presumably do so at least in part because they think it SHOULD have been a big chart single, whereas i tend to agree that lots of "bloodbuzz ohio" voters are indeed album voters who "simply rubber stamp the same artists onto their singles ballot."

swvl, Friday, 21 January 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

I mentioned last month that I'm not including singles from albums already in my top ten unless its life force was such that it generated its own energy outside the album (e.g. repeated plays on my iPod, making it to CD-R's I burn for friends).

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

^^^That's pretty much how I operate.

knits you a baby (The Reverend), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

ditto

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

ditto, tho i always seem to change the rules depending on where i'm submitting my ballot.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

(like following those rules, "yamaha" and "ride" would be eligible for my trax ballot as well as their parent albums on my albums ballot, but it's all too easy to kick them off the list on the basis that the albums are represented just to make room for a couple more trax)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

ditto

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

my top ten def was full of stuff that i thought should /would have been hits in a healthier climate for rap singles, where labels bothered promoting striaght up rap instead of only fucking with shitty crossover tracks

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

i have no arbitrary rules for my list. It's my 10 favorite singles like it asks.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 January 2011 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

mine doesnt have 'rules' those are more 'tendencies'

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

Now, the critics that vote for albums by indie rock bands like The National or Arcade Fire simply rubber stamp the same artists onto their singles ballot, whether or not they ever heard those songs anywhere but in the context of their parent albums. The critic of yesteryear may have spent enough time around radios or out at clubs to hear popular music not already in their record collection, but today's critic apparently keeps his iPod earbuds on all day, sticking to the closed circuit of pre-approved music they find out about from a small number of websites, if not solely Pitchfork.

I definitely think this is true. However, I also think that there are more venues now for sub-mainstream artists to promote "singles" and thus for critics to think about singles in a broader sense than just whatever's on the radio. When it's become routine for indie labels to advance-release songs to websites and blogs, it's no surprise that people start thinking of those songs outside the context of the album.

And to that end, I'd be curious to know whether songs like "Bloodbuzz Ohio" are getting votes from people that *haven't* voted for High Violet but who may have just encountered the song on Stereogum or whatever. Like, I'm not sure I would have even bothered downloading the Best Coast album if I hadn't already loved "Boyfriend" -- and as it happens, it turns out I only really like that one song.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

I picked up the Voice yesterday for the first time in about two years. It's wafer thing now. Surely the print edition isn't going to last much longer?

Position Position, Friday, 21 January 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

"Katy Perry's perfect summer jam "Teenage Dream.""
^you lost me here

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Friday, 21 January 2011 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

I love Teenage Dream, but I wouldn't call it a "perfect summer jam"

gospodin simmel, Friday, 21 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

imperfect autumnal hymn

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

some dude yr screen name is a masterpiece

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

(like following those rules, "yamaha" and "ride" would be eligible for my trax ballot as well as their parent albums on my albums ballot, but it's all too easy to kick them off the list on the basis that the albums are represented just to make room for a couple more trax)

given that "yamaha" in particular is guaranteed to place top 20 at LEAST on ilx, i hope you'd consider giving it an extra bump and pushing it a bit higher

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

"perfect summer jam" is an overused term, wouldn't use it to describe anything. Teenage Dream always gives me a bittersweet feel anyway, so that autumn comment is actually otm.

gospodin simmel, Friday, 21 January 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

I also tend to not vote for songs that are on albums I'm already voting for, but usually this takes care of itself. It's rare that I love a whole album as a unit, and there's a single song on it that seems wildly superior to the others. Not impossible, but rare.

The second of my two blog-posts about P&J stats is now up at the Voice.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 21 January 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

some dude yr screen name is a masterpiece

― amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, January 21, 2011 1:14 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

idgi

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 21 January 2011 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

I'd be curious to know whether songs like "Bloodbuzz Ohio" are getting votes from people that *haven't* voted for High Violet

All right, I did a little poking around.

Out of the 58 people casting a singles vote for the National (mostly for "Bloodbuzz Ohio," but several other songs received votes), only 26 voted for High Violet on their albums list.

Which therefore also means: of the 97 people voting for High Violet, onlu 26 voted for a National song on their singles list. (Might be worth pointing out, though, that 32 of those High Violet voters contributed either an incomplete singles list or none at all.)

Anyway, I think that more or less proves my point: it's not merely a rubber stamp.

Although some poor schmuck who had High Violet as his #1 listed THREE separate National "singles."

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

it's not merely a rubber stamp.

This should say "it's not ALWAYS a rubber stamp."

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

Now, the critics that vote for albums by indie rock bands like The National or Arcade Fire simply rubber stamp the same artists onto their singles ballot, whether or not they ever heard those songs anywhere but in the context of their parent albums. The critic of yesteryear may have spent enough time around radios or out at clubs to hear popular music not already in their record collection, but today's critic apparently keeps his iPod earbuds on all day, sticking to the closed circuit of pre-approved music they find out about from a small number of websites, if not solely Pitchfork.

Maybe they just tend to find that is the best music around?

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

Although some poor schmuck who had High Violet as his #1 listed THREE separate National "singles."

when i think about how much i had to prune my beautiful longlist that ran to well over 100 wholly amazing songs, this makes me REALLY FUCKING ANGRY. what's his name and where can i find him?

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

G Hongro, Norway

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 21 January 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, that's an interesting metric. So I just added retabulations like that for 2008, 2009 and 2010: only count a song vote if the voter didn't cast an album vote for the same artist.

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=2010+Non-Album+Song+Ranking
https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=2009+Non-Album+Song+Ranking
https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=2008+Non-Album+Song+Ranking

"Bloodbuzz Ohio" actually moves up in this ranking.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 21 January 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

that is very interesting! smh at katy perry being the big winner tho. and kanye is the big loser!

awesome to see girl unit move into the top 20 w/that metric

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

We should remember that "Tightripe" was also the song on a fucking car commercial, which is how my girlfriend and her mom discovered the song (her mom eventually wanted the CD because of it).

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

also al, "Dancing on My Own" was kinda huge on the radio here... was that an anomaly?

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

0.373 · 17 · Dan Weiss · 2010
0.225 · 12 · Alfred Soto · 2010
0.207 · 11 · Josh Love · 2010
0.199 · 11 · Rob Sheffield · 2010
0.192 · 11 · Christian Hoard · 2010
0.182 · 10 · Jonathan Bradley · 2010
0.182 · 10 · Chris Herrington · 2010
0.176 · 9 · Stephen M Deusner · 2010
0.172 · 9 · Marc Hogan · 2010
0.157 · 9 · Tom Breihan · 2010

d. weiss and i actually shuffled our ballots a little this year to avoid looking too much like each other. lot of good that did.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

Awesome, Glenn. Thanks for doing that!

The only problem I can see with that metric is that it doesn't take into account cases where someone may have voted for both the single and the album but in different years. (For instance, Rihanna's "Rude Boy" is shown to have 100% "non-album votes." But one of those votes is from Chris Molanphy, who voted for the song's parent album, Rated R, in 2009.) I don't suppose that's something that can be easily fixed, though, since the data doesn't know which songs are associated with which albums.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

also al, "Dancing on My Own" was kinda huge on the radio here... was that an anomaly?

I don't know where you live, Renato, but I remember having a weird moment of culture shock when I visited Australia last month, and the first thing I heard in Sydney was "Dancing on My Own" playing softly throughout the airport.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

btw: proud of the surprising number of other people (4!) who voted for taylor swift's "mean" despite its not being a single and having no chance of getting anywhere.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

^wait, are you Jonathan?

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

btw: proud of the surprising number of other people (4!) who voted for taylor swift's "mean" despite its not being a single and having no chance of getting anywhere.

i thought you guys hated people voting for songs off albums you voted for

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

i try to avoid doing that but sometimes you have to.

jaymc: nah i'm the guy who once got drinks with you and misused the word "erstwhile".

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

when i think about how much i had to prune my beautiful longlist that ran to well over 100 wholly amazing songs, this makes me REALLY FUCKING ANGRY. what's his name and where can i find him?

Go get'm, Lex.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

xp Oh haha, hi.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

0.373 · 17 · Dan Weiss · 2010
0.225 · 12 · Alfred Soto · 2010
0.207 · 11 · Josh Love · 2010
0.199 · 11 · Rob Sheffield · 2010
0.192 · 11 · Christian Hoard · 2010
0.182 · 10 · Jonathan Bradley · 2010

Unsurprising.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

actually, haha, the reason i complained upthread that they conflated the two robyn eps with the final robyn album was that i voted for the first ep as an album and "hang with me" from the second ep as a single, and thus thought i'd A) avoided the duplication thing and B) covered the stuff i liked by robyn this year pretty thoroughly. but no, now i just look like World's Biggest Robyn Fan.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

look at that fucking bearded indie wimp

and jesus christ look at his fucking dull twitter feed! wtf is that.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

0.373 · 17 · Dan Weiss · 2010
0.225 · 12 · Alfred Soto · 2010
0.207 · 11 · Josh Love · 2010
0.199 · 11 · Rob Sheffield · 2010
0.192 · 11 · Christian Hoard · 2010
0.182 · 10 · Jonathan Bradley · 2010

Unsurprising.

grossly.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

why do ppl like that get to vote in p&j and i don't ;_;

quick, someone get me a 2011 music writing gig so i can cancel out next yr's votes of his

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

lol
never change,lex

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

look at that fucking bearded indie wimp

new board descr.?

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

i get erstwhile confused with "often" myself

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

xps "mean" was released ahead of the album as a standalone track - maybe not a SINGLE single but not just a random deep cut either. kinda like nicki minaj's "roman's revenge". another example of how the definition of single is totally nebulous these days. "mean" even had official artwork and everything.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7RzAsulBdUg/TL6JDpwrTFI/AAAAAAAACFo/XBzz6yaQ62U/s320/Taylor+Swift+-+Mean.jpg

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

i get erstwhile confused with "often" myself

i don't know what i thought it meant. some sort of praise.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

guy with the mustache & striped suit is lex, taylor on the tracks is the bearded indie fxck

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

also while no taylor track had the "life of its own" already discussed that meant i had to vote for it as well as the album, if i had it definitely wouldn't have been "mean"! (it would've been "back to december".)

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

xp -- i saw that cover back when it "came out" and thought it was a single, and then it wasn't, but yeah i guess you're right it basically is. it's a pretty obvious single, too.

i still vote for deep cuts, though. i voted for a deep cut on a (terrible) miley cyrus album this year. sort of regret it but what's life for.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

can't remember whether i voted for "yamaha" in p&j - i did in the ilx ballot - but i guess that's technically a deep cut, even if one that took on a life of its own (in dj sets, at parties etc) separately to the album

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

why do ppl like that get to vote in p&j and i don't ;_;

quick, someone get me a 2011 music writing gig so i can cancel out next yr's votes of his

― ilxor, Friday, January 21, 2011 4:34 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

^

I tell you what, he definitely looks like the type of dude who would overload his ballot with National songs...

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

also al, "Dancing on My Own" was kinda huge on the radio here... was that an anomaly?

I don't know where you live, Renato, but I remember having a weird moment of culture shock when I visited Australia last month, and the first thing I heard in Sydney was "Dancing on My Own" playing softly throughout the airport.

― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, January 21, 2011 2:22 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark

Edmonton. It was on the radio every hour here a few months ago. Couldn't escape it.

Who are you irl, btw? Too many peeps here to keep track of.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

also while no taylor track had the "life of its own" already discussed that meant i had to vote for it as well as the album, if i had it definitely wouldn't have been "mean"! (it would've been "back to december".)

while voting i actually went to my last.fm to back myself up on this, and "mean" was my second-most-played track of 2010, so i felt safe.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

can't remember whether i voted for "yamaha" in p&j - i did in the ilx ballot - but i guess that's technically a deep cut, even if one that took on a life of its own (in dj sets, at parties etc) separately to the album

Mine too, for these reasons, and it was the only track Love King and Dream skeptics would concede was any good.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc = from Chicago. Unlikely you know him in real life, renna.

Alex in Montreal, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

didn't "yamaha" have a (third of a) video?

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

yamaha had a video

*gets the power* (deej), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, here it was:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fia9nIbEjag

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

Ah fair play I just figured I knew who he was cause he was using my government name.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

while voting i actually went to my last.fm to back myself up on this, and "mean" was my second-most-played track of 2010, so i felt safe.

bless last.fm for making these lists easier, if not easy

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

I need to figure out how to use it! I delete and add so many songs from my iPod. My work iTunes has maybe twenty-five songs at most.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

you can get ipods to scrobble. admittedly half the people i know can't, but i could and i can never get these things to work, so it can't be that hard.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

my ipod abruptly started scrobbling last year. this probably happened because i switched to linux and started using a different media player. i'd tell alfred to switch to linux but it seems drastic.

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc's real name is S4njay McD0ugall iirc

knits you a baby (The Reverend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

i may not rc

knits you a baby (The Reverend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

is "scrobble" some kind of cybernetic masturbation?

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

didn't you see the yamaha video?

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

as in "When I went to bed I left my iPod on the table by itself scrobbling."

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

my ipod abruptly started scrobbling last year. this probably happened because i switched to linux and started using a different media player. i'd tell alfred to switch to linux but it seems drastic.

who are you on last.fm?

tho all of this seems to be moot for now given that the useless site is down again

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

Terius is so awkward in videos I almost don't like watching them.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

Ah fair play I just figured I knew who he was cause he was using my government name.

Sorry if that weirded you out! I just recently made the connection between "rennavate" and your real name, which I know from the Singles Jukebox (which I used to write for, too).

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

No, it's totally cool. I don't mind being connected to this place. I don't say anything more outrageous here than I do elsewhere on the internets.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

xp i'm here on last.fm but i've been there since i was 17 so the numbers can be Kind Of Bizarre. (also i am 17 in the picture.)

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

At the beginning of last year, I wiped out all my old scrobbles and started anew.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

i remember the day death cab for cutie finally dropped from the top 10

that was the culmination of years

difficult listening hour, Friday, 21 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

Even Drowned in Sound though Pazz Jop was boring this year...

http://drownedinsound.com/news/4141845-pazz-amp-jop-critics-poll-results-announced

lol

;)

jimitheexploder, Friday, 21 January 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

i don't foreseeing deleting my last.fm scrobbles. got nothin to hide.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

At the beginning of last year, I wiped out all my old scrobbles and started anew.

you can also choose to display yr top artists chart for, say, last 12 months -- this helps

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

Your musical compatibility with Inuxx is Super
Music you have in common includes Taylor Swift, Curren$y, The Mountain Goats, Robyn and The-Dream.

ilxor, Friday, 21 January 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

also al, "Dancing on My Own" was kinda huge on the radio here... was that an anomaly?

I don't know where you live, Renato, but I remember having a weird moment of culture shock when I visited Australia last month, and the first thing I heard in Sydney was "Dancing on My Own" playing softly throughout the airport.

― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, January 21, 2011 2:22 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark

Edmonton. It was on the radio every hour here a few months ago. Couldn't escape it.

Who are you irl, btw? Too many peeps here to keep track of.

― rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, January 21, 2011 4:43 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark

well, it charted really high in lots of countries (haven't found its chart info, if any, for Canada), but in the U.S. it was #3 on the Hot Dance Club Songs chart but didn't crack the Hot 100 at all, which, since P&J voters are largely American, kind of gives it a dash and an asterisk in my data (as opposed to songs that didn't chart anywhere, which just get a dash and no asterisk).

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:43 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, that makse sense! Don't mean to shoot holes in your argument or anything, just wondered about that track.

rihanna rennavated my dick (rennavate), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

oh no, it's cool. basically the main # i talked about in the article is the 15 songs out of the top 25 that charted at all this year (as opposed to the 21-24 average in most previous years), and Robyn is included in that number. in the past a lot of pretty famous songs on P&J polls didn't appear on the Hot 100 but did appear on other charts: R&B charts, dance charts, rock charts, or landmark rap songs from before there was a radio format for them, big European hits that didn't cross over, and in the 90s huge pop hits that weren't allowed to appear on the Hot 100 because a physical single wasn't sold.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Friday, 21 January 2011 22:54 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, and back on the issue of song lists that are just the voter's favorite tracks from their 10 albums, there's also this query so far down the list that probably nobody has looked at it but me:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Votes+per+Artist+per+Ballot

This is a cross-tabulation of groups of votes by a given artist on a single ballot, by year and size, so you can see how many pairs, triples, etc. there were. And I just also added this one:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Artists+per+Ballot

Which is a simpler, if slightly less revealing, cross-tab of (complete) ballots by year and number of artists mentioned.

glenn mcdonald, Saturday, 22 January 2011 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

ha, the person with 8 votes given to a single artist put 7 glee tracks on his singles ballot

prolego, Saturday, 22 January 2011 10:48 (fifteen years ago)

AAARGHHH i can't believe people like that exist and are permitted to be critics. he also voted for ke$ha and nicki minaj's execrable "check it out". AARGHH.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Saturday, 22 January 2011 10:53 (fifteen years ago)

Having cast the other vote for Nicki Minaj's "Check It Out," I would like to commend this person's exquisite taste, once he leaves the hermetically sealed Glee universe. (I've never seen Glee, so maybe those songs are great too.)

clemenza, Saturday, 22 January 2011 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

i like "Check It Out" too

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

Glee is crap flavored crap. I can't think of many of the arrangements they've done for pop songs that I've even enjoyed, much less approached the original.

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

I like Tik Tok if you cut the verses out

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

I think the Glee version of "Teenage Dream" is pretty good.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

MTV Hits played it as a video for a little while and it was horrifying imo

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

i hate how they use autotune on every song as an aesthetic choice. makes all the songs sound sterile and robotic, ie the godawful Don't Stop Believin version they did. ain't they supposed to be a choir yo?

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

i mean it's faint autotune but it's obv there

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Saturday, 22 January 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

glee songs sound pretty good stoned. or so i've read.

scott seward, Saturday, 22 January 2011 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Really regret not voting for Kelis - Acapella in this...such an underrated 2010 tune.

Davek (davek_00), Saturday, 22 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Shite that was meant for the ILM poll thread. Must think more carefully before clicking..

Davek (davek_00), Saturday, 22 January 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Glenn's Kvltosis ratings are fascinating ... can't stop looking at them. It's like some alternate universe poll where only the fringe genre voters get their say. Not sure what else to say about it, but the top 20 is more unusual and interesting than any actual top 20 from any publication I've seen.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 22 January 2011 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

it's definitely interesting but as far as Glenn's funhouse mirror versions of the poll go i think it's one of the more random and arbitrary ones in practice because there's probably no particular pattern or logic to who does ranked or unranked ballots and who gives 30 points to one album and so on.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Saturday, 22 January 2011 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

Glenn's magical mathematics work wonders yet again! savior indeed.

Ioannis, Saturday, 22 January 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

oh, btw, good piece, Al.

Ioannis, Saturday, 22 January 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

thanks!

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Saturday, 22 January 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

some dude: Actually, both kvltosis and the centricity on which it is based use plain vote-counts, not point values.

glenn mcdonald, Saturday, 22 January 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

ohhh i see

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Saturday, 22 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

quick note: jaymc's test says people who vote for national singles aren't necessarily folks who voted for the album they came from, but it's probably worth remembering another thought process for album-focused people -- say, the one where an album like that isn't QUITE in someone's top 10, so they perhaps use the singles ballot to toss a vote toward the act in general. almost as if a 'single' is some baby or seed that didn't manage to grow up into a good enough adult LP. this is a poor approach to a singles ballot -- i'm sure many of you will consider it something that calls for bloodshed or a UN tribunal -- but i can certainly imagine some voters (esp younger ones with narrow purviews ... and/or grind-it-out specialists in album-oriented genres!) operating a little along those lines, you know? where singles are just standout cuts from albums that didn't make your ballot as a whole -- i.e. 'songs you liked.'

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Saturday, 22 January 2011 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

^^ if it's not clear, um, i'm not supporting that, just saying jaymc's test might miss something

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Saturday, 22 January 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

otm. now on your way, u. ;')

Ioannis, Saturday, 22 January 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

nabisco otm

amphetamine enhanced scholar (Drugs A. Money), Saturday, 22 January 2011 23:25 (fifteen years ago)

I.e., singles poll = Europa League.

glenn mcdonald, Sunday, 23 January 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

good point, nabisco. that's why i didn't really take that into account in my theories about indie-heavy singles ballots -- i'm sure there are people that are just using their singles ballots to vote for up to 20 indie artists instead of rubberstamping the 10 from their albums list.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Sunday, 23 January 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

"indie artists"

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Sunday, 23 January 2011 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

indie...bands?

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Sunday, 23 January 2011 05:41 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, Nabs, that's a good point and one that I did consider as I was glancing at every ballot on which the National appeared.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Sunday, 23 January 2011 06:02 (fifteen years ago)

maybe one thing i can bug glenn about trying to do, whether this year or for next year's poll, is crossover between artists on both the albums and singles poll and what artists appeared on both of a critic's lists, i imagine that's changed a bit in recent years as well.

gosamosapodin simgibmelreel (some dude), Sunday, 23 January 2011 06:08 (fifteen years ago)

i'm sure many of you will consider it something that calls for bloodshed or a UN tribunal

not the tribunal, we don't need that if we KILL THEM ALL FIRST

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Sunday, 23 January 2011 11:01 (fifteen years ago)

the bloodshed, yes.

seriously, looking at some of the people who got to submit ballots is enraging. how do those people have careers in music journalism with their incuriosity and ignorance.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Sunday, 23 January 2011 11:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, man. righteous! so, how does the latest Agalloch CD strike you, lex?

Ioannis, Sunday, 23 January 2011 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

seriously, looking at some of the people who got to submit ballots is enraging. how do those people have careers in music journalism with their incuriosity and ignorance.

Pretty sure I would fall into this group. (Or maybe, not having a career in music journalism, I'm exempt.) It sure has been a long time since I was enraged by anything concerning a year-end poll, though.

clemenza, Sunday, 23 January 2011 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

some dude: like this?

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Duplicate+Artist+Votes

glenn mcdonald, Sunday, 23 January 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

how do those people have careers in music journalism with their incuriosity and ignorance.

How can you tell that they're incurious/ignorant?

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Sunday, 23 January 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

cuz they voted for the wrong stuff obv

call me mr. flintstone, i can scream at dinosaurs (San Te), Sunday, 23 January 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

i can tell you that not all 700 of those people don't exactly have thriving "careers"

CC: Peniston (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 23 January 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

some dude: like this?

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Duplicate+Artist+Votes

― glenn mcdonald, Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:59 AM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark

i was thinking more something that shows the single list for a given year w/ a number of percentage of its votes that came from people that voted for albums by the same artist, although that's cool too.

some dude, Sunday, 23 January 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, I did those earlier: look for "20xx Non-Album Song Ranking" in each year.

glenn mcdonald, Sunday, 23 January 2011 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

oh right duh, i saw that at one point and then forgot it already existed when i thought about the idea later. very interesting that "Monster" drops way less than the other Kanye singles in that version.

some dude, Sunday, 23 January 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

so, how does the latest Agalloch CD strike you, lex?

pffft lex doesn't like agalloch. isnt he more of a sun city girls type iirc?

the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Sunday, 23 January 2011 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

my girl pointed out that a CONSIDERABLE percentage of those polled are so far out on the periphery of "music journalism" or the bidness that she takes these results with a grain of salt.

thank you based jättegod (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 23 January 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, the results would be way more interesting if the poll was back to like it's roots of having like 200 people. Never understood that horserace between the Voice and Jackin' Pop to get the most people involved so the results can be even more homogenous?

If you vote once you're grandfathered into to like every subsequent poll iirc. There's like names of dudes on that list who haven't logged a valid clip in years.

Fuckin' perfect. Like Marilyn Chamberz perfect (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 23 January 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

It could be worse, they could have voters who aren't even critics like in all the ILM polls.

the new mordy & zingy ilxor persona (Algerian Goalkeeper), Sunday, 23 January 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

Welll--dunno about "critics" (big word!) but some of us are reviewers--meaning money involved, publisher's getting some even if writers aren't. I won't usually do it for free, and never a freebie for a publisher, meaning I see ads. Which makes you a publisher, not a blogger. Even if you claim the ads just keep the site going. Might not follow such a rule forever, but I won't do away with it. Fewer and fewer publicists care about such distinctions--they may say "Please do not share this download" --of a track, vs. watermarked EPs or albums, but those tracks are meant to go viral as possible, and the "please" just makes it more enticing, of course. Up front "Do share" is becoming more common, especially for embeds. So, the distinction between approved bloggers and real journos is becoming less significant, at least in terms of legit access. Plus, you maybe could not let the intern out til he's checked the latest filing of everybody on the mailing list, but that wouldn't nec be accurate either. For instance, a couple of my own regional outlets keep reviews and previews print-editon only (so you can't google past those giant glossy-ass ads)

dow, Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/singles/2010/RW1waXJlIFN0YXRlIG9mIE1pbmR8fHxKYXktWiAoZnQuIEFsaWNpYSBLZXlzKQ==/

fruit of the goon (k3vin k.), Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

Never understood that horserace between the Voice and Jackin' Pop to get the most people involved so the results can be even more homogenous?

Not sure what you're talking about ... didn't P&J participation peak in the years before the turnover at the Voice, i.e. before Jackin' Pop (which only ran for like two years) even got started?

NoTimeBeforeTime, Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

lol good find kev -- dude voted for 3 09 singles

wee-based god (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

Again, speaking as someone far out on the periphery of music journalism who hasn't logged a valid clip in years and who aren't even a critic anymore, a big high-five to all the other voters who fit that description too. To me, the only criterion that matters is whether you have anything interesting to say about the records you vote for. It doesn't matter whether you get paid to write or not, doesn't matter whether you have a popular blog or not, and it doesn't matter whether you heard 1,000 albums last year or whether you heard 25. Someone who votes for all the right records but has nothing interesting or (even better) funny to say about them, that kind of voter holds no interest for me. If you're an old guy with your own voice, a bit of perspective, and a good joke or two, that's much more valuable to me. What was missing from the commentary for me this year wasn't somebody explaining to me the importance of LCD Soundsystem; it was (by choice or otherwise) Rob Sheffield, Chuck Eddy, Frank Kogan, people like that (I still miss Marcus, who doesn't even vote anymore). Those are the people I want to read. Does Billy Altman still write about music? Probably--I don't know. I know he still writes about baseball. But who cares? He should be allowed to vote forever. He's Billy Altman.

clemenza, Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

I accidentally voted for an '09 song too--May of '09! The world continued function as before.

clemenza, Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

I may criticize the results of the poll or theorize about the thought process of voters, but imo the electorate is what it is and there's not much point in hand-wringing about who gets let into the treehouse and who doesn't. you can't turn back time to before blogs and everything swelled the ranks, and trying to sort out who's famous or experienced or cool enough to deserve a ballot is suuuuuch a bad direction to take the conversation. really there are a good number of retired or lapsed critics (including some here: jaymc, da croupier, haikunym) that don't vote in P&J anymore because they don't write professionally about music much anymore that i wish did still vote. and any attempt to narrow the votership down to make the results 'better' would be a total folly.

we're on dis innocuous ting that makes you irrationally angry (some dude), Sunday, 23 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

OK, I only just noticed that applegirl002 got no votes. Burn the thing down.

glenn mcdonald, Monday, 24 January 2011 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

Alao, what's necessarily so wrong with "music as a tool to jack up your credibility" (Caution: may not be exact phrase)? Musicians do that too. The music gets raised a little higher for scrutiny's sake, if you do it right.

dow, Monday, 24 January 2011 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

For the record, the non-metal ballot I would have cast if I were allowed to cast 2:

Albums

BUMP OF CHICKEN: COSMONAUT (15)
Fefe Dobson: Joy (14)
Manic Street Preachers: Postcards From a Young Man (13)
Juliana Hatfield: Peace & Love (12)
Jewel: Sweet and Wild (Acoustic) (11)
Jimmy Eat World: Invented (9)
Frightened Rabbit: The Winter Of Mixed Drinks (8)
Shakira: Sale El Sol (7)
Shearwater: The Golden Archipelago (6)
Jónsi: Go (5)

Songs

Editors: "Bricks and Mortar"
Delays: "The Lost Estate"
Belle & Sebastian: "Suicide Girl"
Manic Street Preachers: "Distractions"
Goldfrapp: "Head First"
School of Seven Bells: "Heart Is Strange"
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: "New Babies; New Toys"
Killing Joke: "Honour the Fire"
Kim Yeo Hee: "My Music"
HIM: "Love, the Hardest Way (Tiësto Remix)"

There were 3 other votes for the Manic Street Preachers, 10 for Frightened Rabbit, 4 for Shakira and 25 for Jonsi; the other 6 albums I'd have been alone on. Of my singles, "Heart Is Strange" got 1 vote and "Bricks and Mortar" got 1 last year; the other 8 got nothing. Not even "Head First", which I really thought was my pop crossover for the year.

Weirdly, my centricity score for this ballot would have been exactly the same as the one for my real (metal) ballot. My highest-placing metal album was Agalloch at 48; my highest-placing non-metal album would have been Jonsi at 49. In fact, these 5 points for Jonsi would have been enough to swap their positions.

glenn mcdonald, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:13 (fifteen years ago)

well, now i know that Jewel had an album out in 2010. Jewel, really? Jimmy Eat World, really? Manic Street...okay, i'll stop.

scott seward, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:17 (fifteen years ago)

Bump Of Chicken -vs- Frightened Rabbit

scott seward, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:18 (fifteen years ago)

i was sad that i was the only person to vote for the watson twins album. i love that album. but i think i might have been the only person on earth who ever heard it. vanguard records should be thrown in jail. i kinda wonder if the label is some sort of tax shelter these days. they put out some good stuff, but unless npr picks up on it or someone ends up on prairie home companion it disappears without a trace. i'm glad they send me actual promos though. once or twice a year i get a great record. that nobody hears...

scott seward, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:23 (fifteen years ago)

and i guess it makes me sad cuz most of the stuff i vote for is tiny label freakshow stuff that will always be exactly that and i know that and i'm fine with it, but when i vote for something totally normal that could be a modest success commercially it STILL ends up being something that 99.99% of the world is unaware of.

scott seward, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:36 (fifteen years ago)

The Jewel album is a country record, and decent, but my vote is for the bonus disc with her solo acoustic versions of all the songs. No matter what over-produced weirdness she consents to, she's still a truly great singer.

The Jimmy Eat World album would belong on the list for its drum sounds alone.

And the MSP album is them back in shameless radio-anthem mode, and there are few bands better at that.

The Frightened Rabbit vote needs an asterisk: I HATE the single "Swim Until You Can't See Land", so my version of the album drops that and adds the later b-side cover "Don't Go Breaking My Heart". Much, much better flow that way.

glenn mcdonald, Monday, 24 January 2011 05:41 (fifteen years ago)

Glenn, you made me seek out "Distractions," which is indeed a good track, better than most of the album it didn't make it onto.

Simon H., Monday, 24 January 2011 07:04 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, and all the b-sides are better-mixed than the album itself!

Simon H., Monday, 24 January 2011 07:06 (fifteen years ago)

lex lex i've got u this time!!!

what abt when princess nyah says "u see the legs & the back but no arse out" out on her pass out freestyle? u think that's funny right? ok bad example that's not that funny but what abt when na'tee is ripping some wasteman a new one, that's p fuckin funny right? for profit!

zvookster, Monday, 24 January 2011 14:15 (fifteen years ago)

What was missing from the commentary for me this year... was (by choice or otherwise) Rob Sheffield, Chuck Eddy, Frank Kogan, people like that

Flattered. And while I can't speak for those other two guys, for me, not submitting comments in recent years is definitely "by choice" -- I'm just not inspired to do it the way I was back in the Christgau era, at least partly because the Pazz & Jop section really doesn't strike me as a conversation anymore; Xgau's essay, whatever one thought of it (there was a lot to agree or disagree with, which is part of my point!) always served as a center in the old days, and there's just no equivalent in the new regime. This is in no way a knock on Harvilla (I'm not sure I could have centered the conversation without Christgau's help, either), but it's maybe a sign of the times: Also the fact that Pazz & Jop seems to have so much competition these days, and follows such a deluge of best-of polls now. Also, maybe I've just become lazy.

That said, I'm still curious about what people think of the essays that supplemented this year's poll. I only skimmed most of them, but I actually liked my old intern Tom Breihan's piece about Wiz/Yelawolf/Lil B/Curren$y/etc. a lot -- though that may be because my listening is so outside of that world (and even so, I still don't understand how Drake is "weird" in any interesting way, and I think it's a stretch to say "rap is a safer place for weirdos than it's ever been"; haven't there always been Divine Stylers and Rammellzees and Baseheads and Sensationals out there? Though I suppose they never got to rap for Pittsburgh Steelers fans like Wiz, but I'm not really convinced yet that he's as strange as them, either.) Also learned things from Simon Reynolds' Altered Zones/chillwave essay, though he lost me a few graphs in.

On other issues mentioned here in the past couple days, fwiw, here's what I said in my own essay last year:

Just as disconcerting, there's this year's Top 10 P&J singles, seven of which come off indie-identified albums that also finished in the Top 10. Unheard of--as a point of comparison, perennial P&J album high-charters Sleater-Kinney never placed a single above #35. In the three decades since singles tabulating started, only once before have seven Top 10s emerged from Top 10 albums: 1987, and it took three verifiable hits by Prince and two by Bruce (along with one each from R.E.M. and Los Lobos) to pull it off. The last time even five singles turned the trick was 2000, and none of those—two OutKasts, two Eminems, one U2—had indie cred...
I've got theories. First off: Lazy indie voters turning a fun exercise into a dutiful one by listing random "singles" off albums they also voted for are the new version of lazy AOR voters who used to vote for perfunctory tracks off albums they also voted for. Only the genre and technology have changed, and the fact that the AOR squares--back before our newfangled, allegedly singles-oriented, iTunes-through-shitty-speakers era began--almost always got marginalized by radio-imbibing pop and dance and hip-hop fans.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah tbh I probably have not given you fair credit for influencing the stuff I've written and the stats I've compiled about the singles poll this year, I definitely read your essay last year but had not gone back to it more recently or remembered how spot-on it was.

trv kvnt (some dude), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

I still don't understand how Drake is "weird" in any interesting way

don't worry, no one else on ILX does, either

the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

It's appealing to think the album/single convergence is a result of lazy indie voters, of course. Hey, any time you can feel smugly superior to any majority, however local, right?

But see this ranking of artists by the percentage of their ballots (2008-10) that include both an album and a song:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Duplicate+Artist+Votes

#1 is Kanye, and Janelle Monáe is almost tied with Animal Collective. This isn't the only way to do this analysis, but it suggests that laziness, if that's what it is, isn't a purely indie failing.

If I can ever persuade the Voice to give me historical data, it would be interesting to see this table of artists per ballot, by year, for the whole history:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Artists+per+Ballot

glenn mcdonald, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Well, I was referring to the 2009 poll (when the Top 10 albums and singles list were both more overwhelmingly indie, and both overlapped more overwhelmingly with each other), not the 2010 one. And I never suggested that critics voting for indie music were the only lazy people out there. (In fact, I use the word "lazy" to describe myself in the very same post above where I quote my 2009 essay!)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

And I do realize that chart is for 2008-to-2010, too...But as far as I can tell, outside of Kanye, Janelle, and Robyn, acts generally identified as indie pretty much have a lock on the chart's Top 14.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

But there's indie stuff towards the bottom of that list, too, including 2008 winner TV on the Radio. You might still be right, but the numbers could have dramatically confirmed your hypothesis, and don't. Maybe those people aren't lazy, they just really liked those songs. Or maybe they're no lazier than hip hop voters or R&B voters or any other large subset...

glenn mcdonald, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

Kanye/Janelle are big indie-crit institutions in 2010 I thought...?

some hills are never seen (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Right, "indie voters" inasmuch as they exist, don't only vote for indie rock. (I'm sure quite a few cast ballots for Robyn, as well.) And if the tally doesn't confirm my hypothesis (not sure how such figures could confirm "laziness"), it doesn't disprove my hypothesis, either -- and the plethora of indie toward the top of the list supports my theory more than it argues against it, I'd think. But sure, I have no doubt that the voters "really liked those songs," too -- in fact, I said so in my essay last year. And 2009 may well have been a blip that will never be repeated, and no doubt there are some indie acts (say, maybe TV On The Radio) who aren't perceived even by their supporters as great singles bands. But the one thing that's inarguable is that, in 2009 at least, for whatever reason -- probably not a coincidence -- there was a convergence of albums and singles by the same acts at the top of the lists that had no remote precedent, in Pazz & Jop history, and those acts generally happen to be classified by most people as indie rock. And to me, that still seems noteworthy.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

"No remote precedent" except maybe all those Bruce/Prince/etc. hit singles in 1984, I guess, if you want to get technical. (Though again, those were hit singles, which makes them different than most of what placed high in 2009 by definition. But to be honest I was all argued out about stuff this a year ago -- and people argued it to death upthread here a few days ago, too -- and I didn't really plan to dredge it back up now.)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

(1987, I meant, not 1984.)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

I'm perfectly fine with using "indie" as a pejorative to describe people if the only R&B album on their ballot featured Of Montreal and/or the only rap album on their ballot featured Bon Iver.

trv kvnt (some dude), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

power post

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siiNiX5-zAk

Ioannis, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

I'm perfectly fine with using "indie" as a pejorative to describe people if the only R&B album on their ballot featured Of Montreal and/or the only rap album on their ballot featured Bon Iver.

I guess I don't have to worry. I have no rap or R&B albums at all.

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

Nor did I vote. Ha!

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

I could count all the voters who DO fit that description to counter the "strawman" thing but I'm not trying to turn this into a witch-hunt or anything, I'm just saying.

trv kvnt (some dude), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

Dunno while the Singles side is still such a hot topic, but personally I try never to list a track from any of my Albums, they're just the most or only compelling tracks from albums that didn't quite make or may not have come anywhere near the Top Ten. Or they might be tracks that weren't on albums, like Olof Arnalds' B-side, "Close My Eyes." It's early Arthur Russell folkie reverie, so blissful it kids itself, as Arnalds wickedly slips her sensitive blonde Scandinavian art movie date night appeal all around the cornfed stars.

dow, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

this line of argument troubles me. i guess i don't get what the beef might be. so, certain people nominate tracks off their favorite albums as their favorite songs of the year. so what? how is this any less valid than any other approach? if someone genuinely loved the arcade fire and national albums and spent months listening to them alone in their room, why shouldn't they call their favorite tracks off those albums the best of the year? how is this inferior to separating the two lists out by what one considers "singles artists" and "album artists?"

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:24 (fifteen years ago)

It isn't inferior. I'm just describing what I do.

dow, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:36 (fifteen years ago)

And I do it that way to make room for a few more deserving tracks. But no charity slots--if the most compelling tracks of the year were all on my Albums, those tracks would be my Singles.

dow, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah, sorry. wasn't aiming that at you, dow, though i can see as how it might have seemed that way. was taking aim at an attitude i've seen expressed several times over this last few days, both itt and outside it. strikes me as odd.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

this line of argument troubles me. i guess i don't get what the beef might be. so, certain people nominate tracks off their favorite albums as their favorite songs of the year. so what? how is this any less valid than any other approach? if someone genuinely loved the arcade fire and national albums and spent months listening to them alone in their room, why shouldn't they call their favorite tracks off those albums the best of the year? how is this inferior to separating the two lists out by what one considers "singles artists" and "album artists?"

― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:24 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its redundant?

challopian youtubes (deej), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:45 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe it's not "inferior" but it seems narrow and limiting to me.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:49 (fifteen years ago)

In essence because it asymmetrically privileges album-oriented music. It goes without saying that if you like an album you like the songs on it. By someone listing an album in their top ten it should be pretty obvious that they also think the songs on it are awesome. OTOH the fact that they like the album so much suggests that it's likely (not definite, but likely) that they enjoy those songs in the context of listening to the album.

But there's lots of songs that are listened to in absence of an album - either because they're big hits, or because there isn't an album, or because there is an album but it's bad, or it's in a genre from which the listener checks out songs but rarely buys albums. When we think of songs that shine as songs (outside the context of an album) it is usually stuff in these categories we think of.

If critics simply replay their albums lists in their songs list it marginalises these categories (except possibly "big hits", which might also be from a high-rating album), and fills the list with stuff that is really enjoyed in an album context anyway (for, if it was not, if it really was listened to as a standalone, the critic wouldn't have voted for the album as well).

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 04:59 (fifteen years ago)

Also, this gets lost in the shuffle of everyone doing "tracks" lists, but Pazz & Jop still calls its singles list a "singles" list. And it is a long-standing institution so we can see how people are going about their voting differently than 10-20-30 years ago, which was the point of my putting together those stats and having Glenn put them into handy charts, so you can trace back to when the P&J singles list actually kind of represented the best of what was on the pop charts at the time, and you didn't have non-singles off a top 10 album beating the most highly regarded #1 hit of the year.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 05:48 (fifteen years ago)

that's starting to sound like the 'you're changing the definition of "marriage"' quote-unquote-argument.

j., Wednesday, 26 January 2011 06:17 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, putting Arcade Fire deep cuts on a singles list is pretty gay

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 06:18 (fifteen years ago)

serious lol at that

j., Wednesday, 26 January 2011 06:21 (fifteen years ago)

i prefer "tracks" rather than "singles" because so many standalone tracks these days aren't officially released singles - eg the fives' "it's what you do", i've no idea what the status of that is. it's not available (on itunes) to buy, but they put it on their soundcloud and made a video for it (and given how widely available online it was earlier this year, i suspect they gave it away free).

but yeah, listing tracks off an album you've voted for is SUPER LAME - for all the reasons tim listed, but also because i feel like these ballots are a chance to rep to the wider world for all the music i loved this year, and as much of it as possible. i had over 100 tracks on my longlist - any professional critic who can't find at least 50 tracks they love in a year isn't doing their job properly imo - and every slot i give to an artist already covered in my albums ballot is a slot taken away from another artist who i want to rep for.

lextasy refix (lex pretend), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 08:42 (fifteen years ago)

its redundant?

― challopian youtubes (deej), Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:45 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Maybe it's not "inferior" but it seems narrow and limiting to me.

― curmudgeon, Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:49 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

let me say up front that i'm not defending the way i vote. i tend not to have much crossover between albums and singles/tracks in my own poll ballots. but i wouldn't be at all annoyed by someone who did. it doesn't strike me as redundant, because the questions being asked are different. for example, two people who both loved the taylor swift album might differ on which single off the album is best.

nor does it seem particularly narrow or limiting. in fact, the attempt to enforce a clear distinction between singles and album artists seems far more limiting to me. if we do this, the tracks poll generates not a straightforward list of our favorite singles of the year, but rather a summary of our favorite singles by artists whose albums we didn't vote for, which strikes me as an odd skew to force upon the results. especially given the power of popular singles to seize the public imagination without the assistance of this kind of forced diversity policy. especially given the fact that we increasingly live in a post-album age.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 09:49 (fifteen years ago)

especially given the power of popular singles to seize the public imagination without the assistance of this kind of forced diversity policy

well that's kind of at issue isn't it

are ppl really paying attention to singles if they privilege albums over them

zvookster, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 10:02 (fifteen years ago)

In essence because it asymmetrically privileges album-oriented music. It goes without saying that if you like an album you like the songs on it. By someone listing an album in their top ten it should be pretty obvious that they also think the songs on it are awesome. OTOH the fact that they like the album so much suggests that it's likely (not definite, but likely) that they enjoy those songs in the context of listening to the album.

But there's lots of songs that are listened to in absence of an album - either because they're big hits, or because there isn't an album, or because there is an album but it's bad, or it's in a genre from which the listener checks out songs but rarely buys albums. When we think of songs that shine as songs (outside the context of an album) it is usually stuff in these categories we think of.

If critics simply replay their albums lists in their songs list it marginalises these categories (except possibly "big hits", which might also be from a high-rating album), and fills the list with stuff that is really enjoyed in an album context anyway (for, if it was not, if it really was listened to as a standalone, the critic wouldn't have voted for the album as well).

― Tim F, Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:59 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

i'd agree that ballots featuring heavy album/single crossover might privilege album-oriented music, and probably would tend to exclude certain categories of singles (as you suggest above). but i'm not sure that there's anything particularly wrong with privileging album-oriented music, if that happens to be what one genuinely likes. and less popular singles by non-album-oriented artists will only be marginalized relative to a ballot by someone with differing tastes. i mean, it's not like there won't be at least a few voters who specialize in non-album-oriented singles to take up the slack.

that said, i understand the basic inequality built into the system. popular albums will always contain a slew of at least moderately popular tracks, but popular singles aren't necessarily associated with a parent album. as you suggest, this means that there's a built-in tendency for tracks from popular albums to sweep aside some of the weird minor hits that keep the singles poll interesting. that's a sound argument, imo. i'm somewhat suspicious of the assumed need for this protective umbrella, however, because i don't think people would vote so very differently if we were less insistent about the need for it. nevertheless, i'll grant that it probably has some benefit in this regard.

my deep-down objection to the "albums here, singles there" policy is that it seems intended to arbitrarily diminish the presence of certain types of music in the singles list. not just "album-oriented music," but specific strains of it. i hear a lot of complaining about the strawman indie voter (a character i've invoked before) who threatens to gunk up the singles list with arcade fire and the national cuts, but everyone's cool with the appearance of taylor swift, kanye, and lady gaga in the albums list, when we know that these artists will also dominate the singles poll. i would say that it is the ubiquity in ballots of hugely successful pop artists like this, more than anything else, that leads to homogeneity in the two lists. but perhaps that's unavoidable. a giant hit is hard to deny.

i guess i come out of this conflicted. i like the idea that the singles list could be a haven for secret stars and would be bummed if it simply regurgitated tracks from the albums list. but i'm philosophically okay with imaginary arcade fire fan voting his/her heart.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 11:04 (fifteen years ago)

No-one's arguing for a protective umbrella, they're just saying it's an unfortunate trend.

but everyone's cool with the appearance of taylor swift, kanye, and lady gaga in the albums list.

As chuck's comment upthread indicated, artists with absolutely massive singles and albums have always crossed over both lists. But lots of pop artists with big singles don't cross over to the albums list. Which is fine. But it's not like The National have been promoted as a singles band.

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 11:11 (fifteen years ago)

Taio Cruz ending up with an album in the top 10 would be equiv of The National ending up with a single in the top 10, but that would never happen.

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 11:33 (fifteen years ago)

Or maybe a better comparison is Katy Perry: number 11 in singles, number 158 in albums.

Whereas every single artist with an album in the P&J Top 20 also had a "single" in the P&J Top 40.

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 11:40 (fifteen years ago)

xpost:

yeah, i get that, but the way those songs and albums fall out in the rankings probably reflects the underlying realities fairly accurately. "dynamite" gets lots of love, but very few P&J voters rate rockstarr overall. a bunch of them probably only know the song as a stand-alone single. meanwhile, it's likely that tons of "bloodbuzz ohio" fans love the national album all the way through (can't fucking stand that song/band, btw).

however the national have been promoted, the distinctions between "album artist" and "single artist" aren't as clear in the itunes/youtube age as they might once have seemed. "dynamite" is obviously a much more popular song, but i'm sure we can agree that gross popularity isn't the only or even the best measure of a song's right to do well in a poll such as this.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

No, but is it really likely that fans of The National enjoyed "Bloodbuzz Ohio" as a song in any sense meaningfully distinct from the album as a whole?

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 12:08 (fifteen years ago)

Katy Perry: number 11 in singles, number 158 in albums.

Whereas every single artist with an album in the P&J Top 20 also had a "single" in the P&J Top 40.

i don't want to argue this too aggressively because your point makes sense to me, and i'm conflicted by my own. but i can easily see why all those top 20 album artists would also have songs in the top 40. albums are nothing but collections of songs. we therefore perhaps mislead ourselves in thinking of certain artists as "album-oriented." these artists are popular among voters only because their albums contain songs the voters love. there are very few albums i'd number among my personal favorites that fail to include at least one or two of my favorite songs. i wouldn't say that albums and album-oriented artists are superior to singles and singles artists, but i do put all songs on an equal footing. in this sense, maybe albums are just singles with really long b-sides.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 12:18 (fifteen years ago)

No, but is it really likely that fans of The National enjoyed "Bloodbuzz Ohio" as a song in any sense meaningfully distinct from the album as a whole?

― Tim F, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:08 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark

that's a really tough question that i'm not going to go off on. i want to say "yes," but need to think it through first. plays into what i just said about albums being singles with long b-sides.

on reflection and on a functional level, i guess i have to agree with you and the lex. the best strategy is that which encourages maximum broadness in the lists, representation for as many different artists and musical approaches as possible. with that in mind, album-oriented critics should speak to the album-oriented audience primarily through the albums list.

i'd insert the the caveat that there must be the occasional non-hit song on a critically-respected album that so clearly rises above the rest of the material that it deserves mention on a singles ballot (caribou's "odessa" springs to mind atm). but maybe that's just me.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

No actually contenderizer I agree with your last point entirely. And I think insisting on absolute separation across the board is extreme.

This is one of those things where one person doing something in isolation is fine but a large number of people doing it has unfortunate (mostly unintended) consequences.

And yeah albums aren't superior to singles or vice versa - but the two lists being a bit different from one another does make for more interesting reading.

Tim F, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

Hey all I'm saying is that in 2002 or 1997 or 1991 or 1985 or 1979, the top 10 of the P&J singles list was basically "here are 8-10 of the best hit songs everybody heard this year, with maybe one or two songs that only critics and music nerds know about but generally agree on." The last couple years it's been "here are 3-5 hit songs everybody knows but not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly, and the rest are things we heard on the Forkcast."

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 13:02 (fifteen years ago)

I think "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" is not really a supportable accusation. The P&J was always the list of the most "critic-friendly" songs, whatever their sales, by definition: It's a poll of critics. I don't see how "Bloodbuzz Ohio" making the top 10 is materially different than "Stop Your Sobbing" in 1979, or "O Superman" in 1981, or "Eight Miles High" in 1984. Nor how the Forkcast is any less valid a source of exposure than KZEW or Billboard or however "critics" were hearing (about) new music 30 years ago.

A poll can be (at least) two things: the aggregated trip reports from year-long voyages of musical discovery, or the judgment of a panel of experts on the artistic merits of popular material. If you want the latter, you need a constrained set of choices. Arguably radio and the professional demands of a print-based electorate implicitly provided enough constraint in the early days. Now, not so much, for many many reasons.

But who cares? Why should popularity be the first filter? Why should the Pazz & Jop be the post-amateur division of American Idol? To me the trip-report idea is hugely, overwhelmingly more compelling. The "results" are the least of the poll, to me (and currently I'm the one providing them...). The much deeper value is in the network of associations and connections and commonalities. I'd love to see the poll pushed, in both electorate and structure, towards more diversity, more-varied specialization, more conscious and comprehensive embrace of this role of thoughtful exploration.

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

well put

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

Cool discussion - the proper distinction seems to be between good and bad critics/voters rather than admissible and inadmissible tracks. If a voter listens to a wide range of music over the year (Glenn's voyage of musical discovery) then I'd trust whatever he/she lists as his/her favourite tracks. Someone who restricts themselves to a small number of critically-acclaimed albums and votes for six Vampire Weekend tracks probably shouldn't be voting.

Glenroe in 3D (seandalai), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

my single votes in the pazz & jop weren't singles. i just used that list as an excuse to vote for ten more albums that i liked. you can sue me if you want. i'm not the only one doing that now either. in other words, nine albums that never would have been a part of the poll are now a part of the poll. (voted for the books and other people actually did vote for that as a single.)

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

very well put. but i think some dude's point has merit, and it's echoed in glenn's closing paragraph:

To me the trip-report idea is hugely, overwhelmingly more compelling. [...] I'd love to see the poll pushed, in both electorate and structure, towards more diversity, more-varied specialization, more conscious and comprehensive embrace of this role of thoughtful exploration.

it's hard not to be disappointed when the aggregate trip-report reflects the fact that everybody took the same guided tour.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

But it's not like The National have been promoted as a singles band.

http://stereogum.com/314001/the-national-bloodbuzz-ohio/mp3s/
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/11866-bloodbuzz-ohio/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodbuzz_Ohio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K779pqvYQds
http://www.4ad.com/thenational/news/~download-free-mp/

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

lol auto-embed

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

okay, make that 8 albums. cuz i put a swans song on my list and they were a part of the poll album-wise.

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

that last "very well put" went to glenn xp

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

yeesh that national song. yuck. for when you want to get bored by interpol AND coldplay at the same time, i guess. and the video is just as boring as the song. maybe that was the point.

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

No, but is it really likely that fans of The National enjoyed "Bloodbuzz Ohio" as a song in any sense meaningfully distinct from the album as a whole?

I don't see why this is implausible.

In 2004 P&J I voted for Phoenix's Alphabetical album and also the song "Everything Is Everything," which I heard before the rest of the album and which I found to be clearly the standout track, even as I frequently listened to the whole album. It's the song I put on mixes or put on randomly when I wanted to dance or whatever. It's also the first track on the album, so sometimes I'd get the urge to listen just to the song but then find myself listening to and enjoying the rest of the album, too.

Certainly "Everything Is Everything" wasn't any more of a single than "Bloodbuzz Ohio" -- both were promoted as singles by the label and had videos, but didn't receive radio play or anything.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

I think "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" is not really a supportable accusation. The P&J was always the list of the most "critic-friendly" songs, whatever their sales, by definition: It's a poll of critics. I don't see how "Bloodbuzz Ohio" making the top 10 is materially different than "Stop Your Sobbing" in 1979, or "O Superman" in 1981, or "Eight Miles High" in 1984. Nor how the Forkcast is any less valid a source of exposure than KZEW or Billboard or however "critics" were hearing (about) new music 30 years ago.

My point is that "Bloodbuzz Ohio" is the rule, the songs you point out used to be the exception. Moreover, "O Superman" and "Stop Your Sobbing" were UK chart hits (which, even if the P&J voters were American, they were probably big enough anglophiles to be aware of), and "Eight Miles High" is a cover of a very famous song, so all three of those signal an engagement with popular music that voting for "Bloodbuzz Ohio" does not.

"Fuck You!" and "Runaway," the 2 biggest songs in this year's top 10, were relatively moderate hits and code as way more "critic-friendly" than previous high P&J placers as such Kris Kross or Hanson. It used to be that a high ranking single from a high ranking album signified kind of a big deal, like Nevermind and "Teen Spirit" or Thriller and "Billie Jean." Now it's everyone's 3rd favorite album from journeyman indie band #4742 and the mp3 you got off Stereogum a couple weeks before the album leaked. I think that represents a bigger shift than you're giving credit for.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

This year I decided that I wouldn't vote for any singles by the artists on my albums ballot, not because I wanted to enforce a strict separation between "albums" and "singles" artists, but because I didn't want to have any "automatic" choices on my singles ballot. IOW, I felt that by voting for singles from my favourite albums, I'd be making somewhat safe and lazy choices, without really thinking about which other songs and artists I liked last year. It felt necessary, at least for this year, even though my ballots hadn't contained much overlap in the past (never more than two or three artists in common, I think).

NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

for when you want to get bored by interpol AND coldplay at the same time

the most otm thing i've ever read about the national ^^

the new mordant & zingy ilxor persona (ilxor), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

Ha, I kinda like both Interpol and Coldplay selectively.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see why this is implausible. [see jaymc xpost for details]

yeah, i'd agree with that. the objection has to be that non-smash singles by indie artists are somehow categorically illegitimate relative to "real singles" by non-indie artists and/or that indies get enough love in albums world and thus should keep their grubby pink fingers out of the singles poll.

those are the only arguments i can see, because there's no way to say with any real authority which songs are or aren't meaningfully distinct from the albums that contain them. better to stick with the fact that it's disappointing to see such a narrow and timid range of [redacted]-approved choices passing itself off as the P&J singles list.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

Now it's everyone's 3rd favorite album from journeyman indie band #4742 and the mp3 you got off Stereogum a couple weeks before the album leaked. I think that represents a bigger shift than you're giving credit for.

― trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:48 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

truthbomb

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

How are people gonna know about "Hey Soul Sister" if critics don't put it on their pazz'n'jop ballots?

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

Why should the Pazz & Jop be the post-amateur division of American Idol?

the proper distinction seems to be between good and bad critics/voters rather than admissible and inadmissible tracks

enforce a strict separation between "albums" and "singles" artists

non-smash singles by indie artists are somehow categorically illegitimate relative to "real singles" by non-indie artists and/or that indies get enough love in albums world and thus should keep their grubby pink fingers out of the singles poll

I would like to point out for the record that none of these in any way accurately describe the position I'm taking here. And if anyone reads my posts carefully and still doesn't see the difference, I would be happy to explain why.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

How are people gonna know about "Hey Soul Sister" if critics don't put it on their pazz'n'jop ballots?

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:15 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

never said that voting for Train was an evangelical move, just that I don't think it's that different from people voting for "Tubthumping" in the '90s. and I think voting for that song if I actually like it is different from and more defensible than your "lol let's vote for Hinder" stunt.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

haha ok now who's projecting meaning onto posts

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

so were you just making a general zing and didn't know that I had personally voted for "Hey, Soul Sister"?

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

Oh I knew, but I didn't meant to suggest it was in bad faith (and my Hinder vote has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here). I totally agree that this was not a year of critical/commercial consensus on singles, but if you're gonna complain that back in the day people used to vote for "jump" and "mmmbop," it's worth looking at what the "jump"s and "mmmbop"s of 2010 were. I for one think Justin Bieber's "Baby" was robbed, but with all the gaga and "empire state of mind" in last year's poll, I'm not sold that this is a sign of blinkered indiedom.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

jeezuz a battle between a train fan and a hinder fan. i can't look...

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

i love the idea that trying to punk the pazz'n'jop after a media conglomerate fired its creator isn't "defensible"

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't perceive or respond to any implication of bad faith, I perceived and responded to the joking suggestion that I or anyone else voting for pop hits is trying to educate people about the existence of hugely popular songs they've probably already heard and made up their minds about.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

It's defensible as a protest move, I'm just saying voting for uncool pop facetiously and mocking people who do it sincerely just makes it seem like you'd rather throw sarcastic asides into the discussion (the discussion being both the poll and this discussion about the poll) than engage with it.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

I guess you forgot my own history of sincere uncool pop promotion

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

Anyhoo, to ask the question I probably should have from the get-go, what are the great pop artists who are being slighted by this indie blinkerdom? From your own list, it would sound like Train is one.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, I should say "great pop songs" not artists

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

I would like to point out for the record that none of these in any way accurately describe the position I'm taking here. And if anyone reads my posts carefully and still doesn't see the difference, I would be happy to explain why.

― trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:17 AM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

hey, some dude, the quote of mine you're griping at had nothing to do with you. it was me responding to jaymc responding to tim f responding to me. understand how these chains of communication can get fuzzy, but believe me when i say that i'm not trying to put words in your mouth.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

My standard complaint--While it might not impact the top of the poll, I still wish more of the folks who do write for publications and blogs about genres other than indie-rock would choose to submit ballots. It might distract me some from looking at the albums and songs chosen by the indie-rock only participants.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

I guess you forgot my own history of sincere uncool pop promotion

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:38 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I haven't. That's why I, if not expect you to have my back on this, then at least don't understand why you seem so eager to take cheap shots at my argument.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

contenderizer: I didn't mean to imply you were purposefully misrepresenting me. But since I seem to be the only person ITT standing roughly on the side of the argument you were describing, I wanted to draw a distinction before I got grandfathered into the gray area.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

That's why I, if not expect you to have my back on this, then at least don't understand why you seem so eager to take cheap shots at my argument.

Because I think it's a pretty pious one! It's one thing to notice a lack of enthusiasm for pop wares among the critic pool, it's another to be critical of it without suggesting what they're ignoring. It should probably be noted that the national's last album went Silver in the UK.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

"I wanted to draw a distinction before I got grandfathered into the gray area."

that's what she said!

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

I did a year-end list of my favorite singles of the year and I did stats on Glenn's site that show what hits would've ranked higher if they hadn't been outvoted by non-hits, so you can look at either of those depending on whether you're asking for what I like best or what well-liked hits theoretically would've done better. But either way, I kind of feel like any song I point out is going to met with snorts of derision of "of course that's not as good as the 5th best song on the LCD Soundsystem album!" and I don't really feel like the burden of proof is on me to explain why someone might actually enjoy a multi-platinum pop hit more than an indie album track.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't mean to imply you were purposefully misrepresenting me. But since I seem to be the only person ITT standing roughly on the side of the argument you were describing...

gotcha, and fwiw, i'm more-or-less in yr corner here. what i was trying to do with that post was to come up with a good, defensible way to object to lazy pfork cluster-selection on ballots. in the process, i clowned some less defensible arguments i've seen tossed around but that no one was actually making ITT.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

right, it's all good. I'm glad we can sort that out without screaming "STRAWMAN!" :)

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

Well, as I mentioned earlier, "Bloodbuzz Ohio" goes from #9 to #7 when you eliminate singles votes from people who also voted for the corresponding albums, whereas all Kanye's singles plummet, so while I'm definitely not arguing that the music-critical world hasn't changed, I don't think singling out the National this way is helping us understand how.

Just for another bit of information, I added the P&J top 100 albums to this dataset I happened to have of 39 other year-end polls:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Album-of-the-Year&query=Pazz+%26+Jop

The National appear on 33 of those 39 (including Rolling Stone and Spin), and in the top 10s of 20 of them (including last.fm and Amazon).

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

eg the fives' "it's what you do", i've no idea what the status of that is. it's not available (on itunes) to buy, but they put it on their soundcloud and made a video for it

The way I construct my ballot, if a video was made to promote it separately from the album, I'd probably let myself consider it a single for Pazz & Jop purposes. (I try to limit myself to actual "singles," but how I define the word might not make sense to anybody else. Like, when I got an email yesterday that "Midnight America," my favorite track on the spotty 2010 album by Texas country band Rosehill, now has a video, that automatically put it in the running for consideration as a single in 2011. If I get a press release singling out a track I like a lot as a focus track, that counts too, even if I never hear the song on the radio or it never charts or I never see the single in a physical format.)

I don't see how "Bloodbuzz Ohio" making the top 10 is materially different than "Stop Your Sobbing" in 1979, or "O Superman" in 1981, or "Eight Miles High" in 1984.

Well, for one thing, when those three earlier songs charted in Pazz & Jop, none of them existed as part of an album, did they? "Eight Miles High" wasn't on Zen Arcade; Anderson's debut album didn't come out until 1982 (and didn't have "Walk The Dog" on it even when it did -- the single scored with both sides in Pazz & Jop.) The Pretenders album technically came out at the tail-end of 1979, but iirc didn't show up on Pazz & Jop until 1980, which is the year critics actually heard and connected with it. So that's a huge difference, right there.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

The way I construct my ballot, if a video was made to promote it separately from the album, I'd probably let myself consider it a single for Pazz & Jop purposes. (I try to limit myself to actual "singles," but how I define the word might not make sense to anybody else. Like, when I got an email yesterday that "Midnight America," my favorite track on the spotty 2010 album by Texas country band Rosehill, now has a video, that automatically put it in the running for consideration as a single in 2011. If I get a press release singling out a track I like a lot as a focus track, that counts too, even if I never hear the song on the radio or it never charts or I never see the single in a physical format.)

yeah i assumed this as well, which is why i voted for a 2 yr old max b mixtape track & a year old boosie mixtape track

tuomascratch beat (deej), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

"I don't really feel like the burden of proof is on me to explain why someone might actually enjoy a multi-platinum pop hit more than an indie album track."

the burden of proof kinda is on you if you are the one saying that one thing is better than another. does that make sense?

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

i think whiney had a problem w/ that logic or something tho? xp

tuomascratch beat (deej), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

"I don't really feel like the burden of proof is on me to explain why someone might actually enjoy a multi-platinum pop hit more than an indie album track."

the burden of proof kinda is on you if you are the one saying that one thing is better than another. does that make sense?

― scott seward, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:03 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Saying one is better than the other isn't what I've done, though. That's one of the misconceptions I strained to clarify upthread.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

okay must have missed that.

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

The way I construct my ballot, if a video was made to promote it separately from the album, I'd probably let myself consider it a single for Pazz & Jop purposes.

makes sense - but if there's a free-floating track around, unattached to album/mixtape, there may well not be a video, but i may well still want to rep for it. some of them are just personal faves, like rich boy & yelawolf's "go crazy" or shawnna's "nappy boy" this year - but they can still take on lives of their own despite never being available to buy and never being promoted as a single (or at all), eg ms dynamite's "bad gyal" in 2009, which was definitely a club anthem in itself.

(which is why i put no stock in "singles" vs "tracks".)

lextasy refix (lex pretend), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

I think when you say people are choosing songs that are "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" you are saying the songs they're picking are not as good as other pop songs.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

Just for another bit of information, I added the P&J top 100 albums to this dataset I happened to have of 39 other year-end polls:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Album-of-the-Year&query=Pazz+%26+Jop

That's a nice resource, Glenn. I'll have the ILM poll results spreadsheet link up with your AoY and P/J databases.

Glenroe in 3D (seandalai), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

Oh yeah Lex, "free floating tracks" (which don't otherwise exist on an album), leaked or not, would definitely count for me, too, if I liked them enough. If they're not on an album, they're a single by definition; what else could they be? (I also figure that any track that shows up on, say, a compilation of dancehall or South African house tracks by various artists must be considered a single by somebody somewhere, and if it shows up on a mix CD curated by a DJ, it must be getting played as a single in some club somewhere, even if I don't go to clubs. So my definition definitely has a real wide scope, but it still has to hinge on something less solipsistic than "a random track I liked a lot.")

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

I think when you say people are choosing songs that are "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" you are saying the songs they're picking are not as good as other pop songs.

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:18 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

don't know what the word "necessarily" means, huh

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

part of the problem in this debate is that we don't really know what we want out of these things. i mean, we want to see our favorite tracks and albums at the top of the ballot results, mixed in with some awesome stuff we've never heard, but beyond that, i don't think there's any clearly defined ideal process or result that things are falling short of.

can anyone honestly say with a straight face that there are certain tracks or albums that are absolutely more or less deserving of high placement in the results than others? i'd hope not, but you never know... for my part i'll happily say that certain artists, due to their popularity and critical respect, will very likely top the polls. but i don't think there's any more to it. people have their tastes, and that's that.

since we can't appeal to absolute artistic virtue, we're left with the wan hope that some sort of wholesome diversity can be obtained. diversity is inherently interesting, and would reassure us that we're not unfairly excluding anyone or anything. it's comforting, like when everyone gets a cookie. we therefore become distressed when evidence of herdlike homogeneity expresses itself, especially when that homogeneity can't be written off as the will of the invisible populist hand.

it's okay when pop artists win, after all, because everyone knows that everyone loves pop artists. being loved by everyone is the job of the pop artist. it's less okay when flaccid indie schmutz blots the landscape, because that sort of homogeneity carries with it a number of uncomfortable implications regarding the voting body. hell, they might even be middle-class for all we know. and they're hoarding all the cookies!

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

anyway I gotta go do some stuff, maybe later I'll have the energy to spoonfeed my relatively simple point some more

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

ive been enjoying more contenderizer posts in the past few months but once in awhile you still write long paragraphs of things establishing issues not in question & im like 'man i just read that'

tuomascratch beat (deej), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

I think when you say people are choosing songs that are "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" you are saying the songs they're picking are not as good as other pop songs.

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:18 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

don't know what the word "necessarily" means, huh

― trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:26 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

dude, you know that's a cop-out. otherwise you're saying the p'n'j placers COULD the best songs, but you're concerned about how critic-friendly they are.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

and if your point is simple, why don't you just repeat it once, short and sweet, instead of whining about how no one gets it.

da croupier, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just saying that I don't buy the idea that "Bloodbuzz Ohio" represents a failure to engage with popular music any more than anything else on the poll. I think we can probably all agree that the new ways in which music circulates have different dynamics than the old ones, but I suspect that has just as much of an effect on Kanye and Janelle as it does on the Arcade Fire. That is, I suspect you're actually understating the situation, and the disconnect between "popular" and "critical", or between "people who just listen to music" and "people who read and write about music", is actually much deeper than it seems in your chart lists, and the intersections of the sets is increasingly the result of coincidence and second/third-order reactions against reactions...

glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

ive been enjoying more contenderizer posts in the past few months but once in awhile you still write long paragraphs of things establishing issues not in question & im like 'man i just read that'

― tuomascratch beat (deej), Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:28 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah, i was peripherally aware i was doing just that, but kept at it anyway.

need to get better at hearing the little voice...

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

"need to get better at hearing the little voice..."

http://www.mydisguises.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/noid.gif

scott seward, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

thanks for the board descrip, scott

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

still has to hinge on something less solipsistic than "a random track I liked a lot"
So, if it's on an original-release album or EP, rather than a comp (or offical single, video, free-floater, focus track, your other exceptions), then it can't be in Singles? Is choosing such a track (especially if it's not from an Albums album) *necessarily* solipsistic and random?

dow, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

Not judging what other folks do in that situation, Don. But yeah, for me, I wouldn't consider a mere album track like that a single. (One reason I didn't vote for Flynnville Train's "Sandman" as a single last year -- though, since they made my albums ballot, it would've been redundant, despite definitely being good enough to make my singles ballot.) (Actually, though, I can see how, uh, Track #1 on an EP might count as a single. If it was a real short EP, and it was clearly the main track, so the other songs were just basically B-sides: Think "Never Say Never" by Romeo Void, or "Ghosttown" by the Specials, say. Which were probably real singles otherwise, anyway.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

I think when you say people are choosing songs that are "not necessarily the best, just the most critic-friendly" you are saying the songs they're picking are not as good as other pop songs.

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:18 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

don't know what the word "necessarily" means, huh

― trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, January 26, 2011 4:26 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

dude, you know that's a cop-out. otherwise you're saying the p'n'j placers COULD the best songs, but you're concerned about how critic-friendly they are.

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:30 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark

What I'm saying is that the list feels more 'filtered' through a critical sensibility, in the broadest most stereotypical "this is what critics like more than the average music listener" way, than it used to be. The critics that put Quad City DJs and Donna Summer and Naughty By Nature and Van Halen and Cameo and Chumbawumba in the top 5 in years past don't seem too cool for school to me like the voters this year and last year. I'm not saying those artists' songs are better than "Fuck You!" or "Runaway," just that they don't easily fulfill a similar kind of predictable critical calculus (Kanye/guy from Gnarls Barkley + expletive-filled chorus = song of the year).

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

and if your point is simple, why don't you just repeat it once, short and sweet, instead of whining about how no one gets it.

― da croupier, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:31 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark

1) In its first 20-odd years of existence, the P&J singles poll was markedly more populist and unpredictable than the albums poll, which made for an interesting counterpoint and went against the grain of a lot of stereotypes about the snobbishness or tunnel vision of music critics.
2) That has changed dramatically in the last few years, with non-singles and minor hits, usually by the same artists that dominate the albums poll, beating out even the most critically well regarded major hits.
3) As a result, the singles poll now feels more predictable and redundant, and P&J's ability to sum up a year in music or contribute to the dialogue about it feels hampered or more limited.

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

btw I just looked at the VV site and realized that the singles list has changed pretty substantially since I wrote my essay a week ago, I guess Glenn's been pretty busy triple-checking the numbers. I should reevaluate my stats before I continue mouthing off!

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

When I looked at the album list a couple days ago, the Bob Seger bootleg was up to #93! But then I noticed how that happened: Placements (on both lists, I think) had been altered to acknowledge ties, but instead of say, two albums tied for #32 followed by an album at #34 (which would be the proper way to do it), they're now followed by an album at #33. And so on, increasingly, down the chart. So the placements now don't really give you an accurate point of departure with which to compare with charts in recent years -- Top 40 or 100 now means something different than Top 40 or 100 used to, since suddenly way more than 40 or 100 albums can fit within those charts, if that makes any sense to anybody.

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

"Charts in previous years," I mean -- specifically, ones that ran in the VV P&J print versions. (For all I know, that same situation with numbering "tied" albums eventually happened in the past few years in the website version, and I just never noticed. Possibly a software glitch?)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

(And of course only the Top 40, not Top 100, would have ever run in print. But Christgau's essay regularly mentioned where other finishers placed, almost always down to #50, and sporadically down to 100 or even lower.)

xhuxk, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

woah yeah the tie thing explains all the changes -- is that a glitch or a deliberate change of approach?

trv kvnt (some dude), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

was looking at the P&J top 20 albums to see what they had in common. though some of these distinctions are quite arbitrary, this is what it looks like to me:

pitchfork best new music - 15/20
indie - 13/20
rock (all indie) - 12/20
chart topping (US top 20 albums) - 10/20
club pop (rap, r&b, dance) - 7/20
rap and r&b - 4/20
electronic - 4/20
billboard #1 - 3/20
country and americana - 2/20
progressive - 2/20
punk - 2/20

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 27 January 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

I don't control the Voice's site, although I will continue my attempts to get them to get it right. At the moment the numbering there is wrong in two ways: not skipping numbers properly, as Chuck noted, and on the album side, not respecting the number-of-votes tiebreaker for albums tied on points. Both of these are right in the Needle version.

Also, if you'd checked the Voice's version of the singles results during the first 24-ish hours after they came out, you might have seen them before they included remix and carryover votes, so several things shifted around once that data was added.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 27 January 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i think i updated my stuff after the first couple days, i was just confused by the more recent changes.

trv kvnt (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 01:37 (fifteen years ago)

good orig. research cntndrzr--that's quite depressing.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:13 (fifteen years ago)

to amuse myself, P&J top 20 singles broken down by similar categories (21, actually, through the two #16s):

would-be chartpop (billboard top 100, or close to it) - 15/21
appeared on the pitchfork playlist - 14/21
rated "best new music" on the playlist - 13/21
appeared on an album rated "best new music" - 13/21 (16/21 in either of these 2 categories)
appeared on an album in the P&J top 20 - 12/21
club pop (rap, r&b, dance) - 12/21
indie - 8/21
rap and r&b - 8/21
US top 40 - 7/21
electronic (excludes most rap and r&b) - 6/21
rock - 5/21 (4/5 indie)
US #1 - 2/21

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:14 (fifteen years ago)

Metal - 0/21

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

apparently no-one should vote for metal because it isn't popular enough and has only had 3 hit singles in 15 years, Glenn.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

it would be pretty hilarious if Immortal won this one year

teen laqueefah (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

maybe if someone does a novelty ambient version? or the benny hill version somehow gets big

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

it's a shame that just trying to have any kind of conversation about larger trends in the way the electorate votes instantly gets people all defensive like you're trying to tell them what they shouldn't vote for or that they like the wrong things.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

people vote for what they like, its no big deal really.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

and its not really surprising that people vote for an album then vote for their favourite track or 2 from it if that is their fave songs of the year. It's just for some reason that the past year or 2 its beem one genre that is different from before. Plus songs can now be huge in certain circles without getting mainstream play, kinda how Country music has sold shitloads over the years without mainstream play. Eventually some other genre will do it instead of the current corporate "indie"

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

then of course the fans of current indie will get pissy about it.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

i couldn't personally care less whether any of my fav metal albums win a Pazz and Jop poll. it's always annoyed me how so many metalheads simultaneously decry the mainstream ignoring the genre while also complaining when underground acts gain mainstream acceptance (granted I'm not talking about anybody here in ILX, more or less in other walks of life with fellow metalheads).

teen laqueefah (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

people vote for what they like, its no big deal really.

― Algerian Goalkeeper, Wednesday, January 26, 2011

this is a pretty stupid thing to say when one thing p&j does is give critics an overview of american criticism for them to look at and wonder abt

zvookster, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

This was mentioned up thread, but it seems like it comes down to, "What is each individual person trying to accomplish with his or her ballot?"

1) "People should check out what I like" - trying to get songs or albums on the ballot that you think are important but underheard, i.e., more people need to hear these songs and albums b/c they are good and the cosmic balance would be righted if they are more widely appreciated

2) "We need to figure out the best music of the year-- this is what I think it is"

3) This list provides a corrective to "the best-selling songs/albums of the year"; those metrics represented what everyone liked, this is what is actually good. Same way (x) author will never sell as well as Danielle Steele.

4) We need to comb through what "sold and/or was heard by millions of people" and find out what among that pool was actually good"; I think this is what some dude wants

5) We need to comb through what was "hyped" by indie-oriented sites and figure out what was good;

6) We need to make an "interesting" list of what the man in the street has never heard of. To turn some stones and find music that will be new to most people.

All of these things-- and there are easily a dozen more-- are legitimate reasons for making a list. The question is: WHY ARE YOU MAKING YOUR LIST? And that motivation, when extrapolated to 700 people, becomes P&J.

Mark, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

I'm down with 1, 2 and 6

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:31 (fifteen years ago)

but the man in the street wont have heard of P&J
xp

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

ahh yes let's have a man on the street P&J so afroman can take it year in and out, even if he releases nothing

teen laqueefah (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:35 (fifteen years ago)

like the best male/female awards at The Brits? ;)

Annie Lennox walks P&J top album & singles for the 30th year in a row

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

1) In its first 20-odd years of existence, the P&J singles poll was markedly more populist and unpredictable than the albums poll, which made for an interesting counterpoint and went against the grain of a lot of stereotypes about the snobbishness or tunnel vision of music critics.

While I totally see how you could see it this way (and appreciate you spelling out exactly what your point as), you could also look at the 1997 poll and say it takes until #20 for a song to appear on the singles chart that wasn't a really big MTV hit. That's a less snobby tunnel, but if you're going to complain that songs are just indie album artists and songs from pitchfork/stereogum, you could say the wild populist unpredictability of earlier years is still well within a tunnel of its own.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

Ehhh, I think the problem with that line of thought is that MTV in those days was open to lots of fairly marginal things that weren't exactly blowing up radio or the Hot 100.

The Reverend, Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:20 (fifteen years ago)

Well, "the tunnel vision of music critics" was a reference to the stereotype of critics turning their noses up at things like MTV so yeah, I don't really see it that way. Besides, while MTV was still pretty central to pop culture in 1997, around the mid-'90s they stopped really breaking many new songs/artists and were mainly following radio's lead at that point in terms of what they were playing. And if I'm talking about critics listening to music outside the internet nerd bubble then it kind of goes without saying that MTV doesn't present problems for me as a primary music source the way Stereogum does (even if MTV in any era is obviously not without its own problems).

xpost - I dunno, Rev, what was in MTV rotation back then that wasn't on the radio too?

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:27 (fifteen years ago)

4) We need to comb through what "sold and/or was heard by millions of people" and find out what among that pool was actually good"; I think this is what some dude wants

If you're referring to the albums poll, you're absolutely wrong. If you're referring to the singles poll... you're still wrong.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:28 (fifteen years ago)

you can even look back at the pre-mtv era and see a real shift as the network gained weight (Ian Dury had the #1 single of 1979, you know).

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

Well, "the tunnel vision of music critics" was a reference to the stereotype of critics turning their noses up at things like MTV so yeah, I don't really see it that way.

I wonder how much of this stereotype is generational - the fact that the critics weren't turning their noses up at it would suggest that.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:32 (fifteen years ago)

you can even look back at the pre-mtv era and see a real shift as the network gained weight (Ian Dury had the #1 single of 1979, you know).

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 7:29 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

he also had a #1 on the UK pop charts with the same song

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

i really don't get why you think American critics liking UK hits with zero recognition here is somehow more "populist" than digging songs from bands that make the top 10 album charts in the US

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

like, Brit-popular new wave stuff would 100% be the Stereogum material of that time

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, agree to disagree there, I guess. Voting for "Common People" is more populist than voting for an Arcade Fire song that wasn't even one of the 3 charting singles off their album, in my opinion.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:15 (fifteen years ago)

"Bloodbuzz, Ohio" went top 20 in Belgium! Game changer.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

xp Dury also hit with a two-sided single not from any album. (The 45 was included as a freebie inside certain copies of Do It Yourself, which unlike Dury's predecessor New Boots And Panties didn't place in the poll, but neither song was on the album itself.) And the song that got the most votes in 1979, M's "Pop Muzik," was a #1 pop single from an album that may well have received zero votes. (Xgau's essay: "In the end we decided not only to add all versions of a song together, but--as a tribute to the ancient concept of the two-sided single--to combine the votes for two songs that appeared on the same record. This is how Ian Dury beat out Robin Scott (a/k/a M), whose 'Pop Muzik' was certainly our song of the year.") And -- though this is maybe subjective -- it's not hard to see how both the Dury and M singles were major formal innovations -- i.e., new wave meets disco (meets early rap, in "Reasons To Be Cheerful"'s case) in pop form. And the top 10 that year also had big chart hits (Sister Sledge, the Knack), small chart hits (Flying Lizards), an indie rock hit (Brains), and Brit hits (Specials, Pretenders) from bands who either didn't have an album out yet or, if they did, didn't score on the album chart. (Fleetwood Mac did way better with "Tusk" the single than Tusk the album that year too. And Donna Summer did well on both charts, but had blown up the pop chart too -- both "Hot Stuff" and "Bad Girls" were multiple-week #1s.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

Brains not an indie rock "hit" i guess. (An actual single, though.) Anyway, that is one excellent Top 10 -- really varied, too.

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I wasn't saying it was a bad one, just noting the contrast to the MTV era

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

Also worth nothing you only needed 29 votes to top it in 1979 - if you broadened the polling base back then I think you'd probably see more laziness in some direction, be it "populist" (what you heard on casey kasem) or "indie" (trouser press stuff)

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

though obv its before my time so I dunno if just the popularity of 7-inches played a big stake in keeping things more single-y and less push track-y.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

all I'm really saying, to reiterate a point from the article I linked upthread, is that we can make fun of the group of critics that named Imperial Bedroom the album of the year, but they could've put "Man Out Of Time" or something in the singles poll, and instead they chose "The Message" and "Sexual Healing."

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

xp Yeah, 7-inches were clearly part of it -- 12-inches (disco discs) too, in some cases. Something critics could hold in their hands.

But my point is that, with both the Trouser Press cult items and the legit pop hits, lots of what seemed to score high then seemed to be songs off albums that critics didn't particularly otherwise care about (or albums that didn't exist). I'd have to look over this year's chart (can somebody else, please? I'm busy), but who is scoring high these days with singles off albums that Pazz&Jop placings seem to agree are definite drop-offs from the band's previous albums? M.I.A.? Hold Steady? (Didn't they put a single in or near the Top 40?) That's what Dury sort of did in 1979 (albeit with a technically non-album single), and Fleetwood Mac, and I think Funkadelic further down the chart (which I also don't have time to actually look at right now.) Get the idea that happens less these days too, but I could be wrong.

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

Metal - 0/21

― glenn mcdonald, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 9:49 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

apparently no-one should vote for metal because it isn't popular enough and has only had 3 hit singles in 15 years, Glenn.

― Algerian Goalkeeper, Wednesday, January 26, 2011 9:51 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Dude, I am a HUGE metalhead (and one of the "vote more metal, critics" choir) and even I can see that it's not exactly a singles genre right now. I had Deftones "Rocket Skates" on my ballot, but like I couldn't even think of 10 legitimate, commercially released SINGLES I could put on an awesome metal ballot

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

Like I'm really into certain rando Rotting Christ and Dillinger and Torche album tracks, but I would exactly call any of them "singles" by any stretch of the imigination.

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

what i'm saying is, pick your battles

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

Would die a happy man hearing Casey Kasem introduce Rotting Christ

eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

is that we can make fun of the group of critics that named Imperial Bedroom the album of the year, but they could've put "Man Out Of Time" or something in the singles poll, and instead they chose "The Message" and "Sexual Healing."

Fair enough, but I think this would hold a little more weight with me if if I felt like the p'n'j critics today were ignoring "The Message" and "Sexual Healing."

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

The "pop needs to be as good now as it was then for this argument to hold water" thing is like...is indie/college rock so much better now than it was then?

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

I'd put Imperial Bedroom and High Violet pretty even in my estimation

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

Fair enough, but I think this would hold a little more weight with me if if I felt like the p'n'j critics today were ignoring "The Message" and "Sexual Healing."

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:35 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i think they do ignore much better songs all the time??

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

I never doubted you did??

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

i meant much better than the ones they vote for, on par w/ the message & sexual healing, not that there are tons of songs better than those

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

I'd put Imperial Bedroom and High Violet pretty even in my estimation

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:14 AM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

if we're gonna have a convenient-comparison-point-off, High Violet finished at #8, the same spot previously occupied by Zen Arcade, Life's Rich Pageant, and Bee Thousand.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

i guess i take rock critics rating/overrating indie as more of a given than rock critics remembering to give a shout-out to this year's "tubthumping"

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

again, i'm not really denying this isn't a trend or noteworthy, but reducing it to "people used to be cool with pop and now they just read stereogum" ignores the stranglehold of MTV - you didn't have to go out of your way to hear that shit. If people don't wanna let "OMG" get its hooks in them, or god forbid prefer some indie jam, I don't think this is a major crime on their part.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

that's kind of been my point this entire time? i mean i haven't really bitched about the albums results because it's Chinatown, but the singles results used to go against my more pessimistic expectations of critics and they don't as much anymore. (xpost)

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Would die a happy man hearing Casey Kasem introduce Rotting Christ

― eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te),

is Casey Kasem still alive?

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

rotting casey could announce it.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, if you really want to know how the singles list would look differently if all the non-charting songs weren't there and the people voted for singles they way I think they used to --

songs that would move into the top 10*: Window Seat, Teenage Dream, Soldier Of Love, Telephone

songs that would enter the top 25*: California Gurls, Born Free, Rude Boy, Ready To Start (ha), Stylo, Nothin' On You, Airplanes, Dog Days Are Over, Hard In Da Paint, Little Lion Man

*based on what was or wasn't in the top 10 or top 25 on the Voice site last week, not the way it currently is with ties moving a bunch of songs arbitrarily up in rank

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

to point out what glenn has repeatedly, though

what moves out of the top ten: runaway, monster, power

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

no, they all charted, so they'd move up from 4-5-6 to 3-4-5. where did Glenn say that?

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

that's a completely different set of criteria than what I just described.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

oh woops, i thought you were talking about if you removed the people who voted for albums and singles from the same artist xpost

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

got confused because i assumed your complaint was with those lazy folks, and not those who dared to vote for songs that weren't pop hits

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

my above post was based on removing the blue-colored songs listed here: https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=P-J-B&query=Pazz+%26+Jop (notice how much more blue 2009 and 2010 are than any previous year)

although I didn't know "Bloodbuzz Ohio" charted in Belgium until you mentioned it, so it erroneously lists that as a non-charting song

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

I realize that if you didn't imbue my posts with meanings they didn't have by paraphrasing them with words I never used ("lazy" or "daring" not to vote for hits) we wouldn't have much to argue about but...I'd be fine with that, actually.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

if you think saying critics are confirming to your pessimistic view of them and aren't "necessarily voting for the best songs, just the most critic-friendly" is too far of a stretch from "lazy," I apologize

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

Lol Kasems alive, he's 78 and voiced Shaggys dad on Scooby Doo Mystery Incorporated last year.

eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Zoinks Scoob, it's a R-R-R-R-R-R-ROTTING CHRIST!

RUH ROH!

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

casey kasem comes from the neoplatonistic druze sect of palestine. which is pretty troo and kult.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

if you think saying critics are confirming to your pessimistic view of them and aren't "necessarily voting for the best songs, just the most critic-friendly" is too far of a stretch from "lazy," I apologize

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:46 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark

and if you think my words are damning of my own argument enough on their own, you shouldn't have to introduce new verbiage when summarizing what you think I believe.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

do you guys even remember what you're arguing about?

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

if the difference between a song being blue lined or carrying an asterisk in the "did it chart" thing is that something wasn't thought to be considered a single, I think a outmoded use of "single" is being used there. The vast majority of those 2009-2010 tracks had one or more of the following apply: they had videos, they were released as vinyl singles, they were released as "promo mp3s" (which is basically a modern version of a single...hell, a lot of pop songs in the U.S. don't have physical product singles.)

Not sure what else something needs to do to be a single these days, unless your definition is just purposefully built in order to keep out certain kinds of music. And even then it's all pointless anyway since anything is eligible for the charts regardless of whether some record label took the time to promote it. I guess most of the 100 or so Cast of Glee charting songs magically become singles just because they get purchased digitally. Not sure how that makes them more of a "single" by the pre-digital definition than, say, Girls songs that have actual 12" and 7" single releases, but hey.

scottpl, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

and if you think my words are damning of my own argument enough on their own, you shouldn't have to introduce new verbiage when summarizing what you think I believe.

you've known anthony long enough that you should be more accepting of his insightful but often reductive quips! (xpost)

― Magill: a gorilla (some dude), Thursday, January 13, 2011 4:55 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

talking about glenn's work here: https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=P-J-B&query=Pazz+%26+Jop

scottpl, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

unless your definition is just purposefully built in order to keep out certain kinds of music.

nail hit on head

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not saying non-charting songs aren't singles, shouldn't be considered singles and/or shouldn't be voted for in singles polls fwiw.

xpost lol anthony

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

do you guys even remember what you're arguing about?

new board decription plz

earnest goes to camp, ironic goes to ilm (pixel farmer), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

cosign

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

btw the "P&J&B" page you just linked, i collected most of that info and decided how it was presented, Glenn mainly helped out with the technical stuff of getting onto Needle and, as evidenced by his posts ITT, doesn't necessarily agree with any of the conclusions I've drawn form it.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

and I will take arguing w/ croup at his most glib over most of the butthurt goon squad i end up on the same ILM threads with more often any day of the week. it's just really exasperating that I've a) spent a lot of time compiling this info and thinking about it and b) have thought about almost every counter-argument before it was even brought up here and worded my posts very carefully because of that and c) still get a bunch of defensive zings about how I'm trying to be the thought police or the popism gestapo or something.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Not sure what else something needs to do to be a single these days, unless your definition is just purposefully built in order to keep out certain kinds of music. And even then it's all pointless anyway since anything is eligible for the charts regardless of whether some record label took the time to promote it. I guess most of the 100 or so Cast of Glee charting songs magically become singles just because they get purchased digitally. Not sure how that makes them more of a "single" by the pre-digital definition than, say, Girls songs that have actual 12" and 7" single releases, but hey.

― scottpl, Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:06 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

The fact that pretty much any song is eligible to chart, and that only a small percentage of them do (although still thousands and thousands and thousands every year), is exactly why I compiled the data the way I did and why I think it illustrates the point I'm trying to make. There have ALWAYS been non-charting indie-niche singles on the P&J singles chart, but the number of them in the top 10 or top 25 in any given year has multiplied several times over lately. Obviously there are a lot of new channels for singles and solitary songs to reach an audience now that aren't measured by Billboard, and I've never said that that's a bad thing.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

you've said people are living up to negative stereotypes of critics and only liking criticy-stuff because of a lack of big pop hits compared to the MTV era and the fact that there are a lot of schmindie fucks who loved High Violet and a lot of schmindie fucks who loved "Bloodbuzz, Ohio" (and hell, I'M weirded out that the overlap between those two groups isn't larger). you may not be reaching lex levels of bile, but there's definitely some indie-shaming going on here.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

are ppl disagreeing with his argument about the general trend, though? is that otm or no?

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

well, if I offered absolutely no editorial opinion on what the numbers mean then we wouldn't be discussing it because it would probably look to most other people like a bunch of numbers. I had to assemble it into some kind of narrative, and I really think that narrative was value-neutral more often than it wasn't, so I just get concerned about people thinking I'm telling them what to listen to, how to think about it or what to vote for. (xpost)

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

I could also see most of the groups in the top 20 having more of a chart presence if MTV was around to push them. "Bloodbuzz, Ohio" would SO be a Buzz Clip and then would easily make the Modern Rock top 20.

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I don't know all of these songs well enough to make a call on that. but in a world where Arcade Fire and Phoenix DO chart on Modern Rock, I kind of feel like if the National or Sleigh Bells or Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti or LCD Soundsystem or Deerhunter were ever going to appear on that chart, they would've by now.

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

There have ALWAYS been non-charting indie-niche singles on the P&J singles chart, but the number of them in the top 10 or top 25 in any given year has multiplied several times over lately. Obviously there are a lot of new channels for singles and solitary songs to reach an audience now that aren't measured by Billboard, and I've never said that that's a bad thing.

yeah, but you all are placing way too much importance on "charting." used to be (in the 80s and 90s) that the alt-y "modern rock" stuff would show up on MTV, then break out (if it was gonna) and get picked up by radio. as the 90s wore on, i guess radio didn't need MTV guidance so much, the point was that there as an "official channel" for this stuff, so to speak.

nowadays, that isn't the case. and pitchfork/blogs are just as much "the radio" as they are "magazines." when something blows up in p-fork blogland, it's not just critics & nerds liking it, it's basically a hit. lots and lots of people are getting their music that way, and passing it on to their friends and college radio programmers and w/e. the national being big in that sphere is a lot like john cougar being big on MTV.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

I get what you're saying and I think it's true to some extent, but not as far as you're taking it. I think if the proverbial "man on the street" were asked how many songs in this year's top 20 they could hum, it'd be a lot lower than 5 or 10 or 20 or 30 years ago, unless that man on the street happened to white and/or college-age and/or pretty 'with it.'

--nakhchi vane (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

you could be talking about the top 20 singles on billboard too

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

haha except the "white" part

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

so a random person you grabbed on the street would be just as likely to know Sleigh Bells or Ariel Pink songs as they would Pitbull or Bruno Mars? really?

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

why are we all in the 2010 thread?

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

the Village Voice site refers to the Pazz & Jop poll that surveys the music of 2010 and releases its results in 2011 as "Pazz & Jop 2010," and so this thread does follow suit

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

so a random person you grabbed on the street would be just as likely to know Sleigh Bells or Ariel Pink songs as they would Pitbull or Bruno Mars? really?

you're misrepresenting what you wrote - think if the proverbial "man on the street" were asked how many songs in this year's top 20 they could hum, it'd be a lot lower than 5 or 10 or 20 or 30 years ago

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

http://alto.to.free.fr/arcade_room/images/pong.jpg

eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

I know, I know but -- seriously, I count maybe 10, at most 12 songs on this year's P&J top 20 that a person has a good chance of knowing if they're not relatively young and/or spend a good amount of time browsing music sites. most of the Billboard top 20 is either oppressively ubiquitous or probably will be in a few weeks. xpost

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

what i'd probably hypothesize from all this is, as the music monoculture loses its weight and its easier and easier to focus on your niche (and honestly, harder and harder to not), critics are feeling less of a need to acknowledge/pay respects to what's left of it, though as the kanye singles-albums crossover suggests, they LOVE to when the opportunity arises

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Conversely, ask the average person on ilx what Edward Maya & Vika Jigulina's "Stereo Love" sounds like

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

what i'd probably hypothesize from all this is, as the music monoculture loses its weight and its easier and easier to focus on your niche (and honestly, harder and harder to not), critics are feeling less of a need to acknowledge/pay respects to what's left of it, though as the kanye singles-albums crossover suggests, they LOVE to when the opportunity arises

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:21 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah ive been saying a similar thing w/ rap (and rap singles) as a whole this year, it seemed really noticeable to me -- rap is again an 'underground thing' the way it was in the early 90s

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

what i'd probably hypothesize from all this is, as the music monoculture loses its weight and its easier and easier to focus on your niche (and honestly, harder and harder to not), critics are feeling less of a need to acknowledge/pay respects to what's left of it, though as the kanye singles-albums crossover suggests, they LOVE to when the opportunity arises

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:21 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

yeah totally. Kanye will probably be the placeholder "hey look a chart-topping pop phenomenon on my ballot!" artist for a lot of critics for a long time.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

gaga, jay-z, kanye, the "artist" stars are still doing fine on pazz single charts, it's the random earworms that gain their power in part from being inescapable that are falling down the charts because its easier and easier to escape them

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

in terms of how its treated by critics, i mean, not in terms of popularity per se xxp

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

gaga, jay-z, kanye, the "artist" stars are still doing fine on pazz single charts, it's the random earworms that gain their power in part from being inescapable that are falling down the charts because its easier and easier to escape them

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:25 PM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark

this is definitely true. says a lot that "Empire" was Jay's first P&J #1.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

like i guarantee every time i've heard "OMG" I've enjoyed it just a little more, but fuck you if you think i'm just gonna make myself experience it they way I did a top ten song in the nineties

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

that song? oh heavens no, no argument there.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

haha actually, I hated most pop shit as a teen in the 90s, but judging from p'n'j critics had a little more stockholm syndrome going on back in the day

da croupier, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

like i guarantee every time i've heard "OMG" I've enjoyed it just a little more, but fuck you if you think i'm just gonna make myself experience it they way I did a top ten song in the nineties

― da croupier, Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:27 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is a weird song that way. really ingratiating in a way that encourages resistance

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'd like to ask everybody, reviewers (whether you voted or not) and non-reviewers too: in what way do you find P&J to be useful? As a shopping list (and/or list of Musts To Avoid, Subjects For Further Research, like for listening without paying for it)? Or confirming suspicions, unexpected revelations, mildly entertaining means of procrastination, other, none of the above, not at all?

dow, Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

stunting

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6qk1AFH9Y4

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

in years past it was great as a shopping list. lately, for me, it's more of a porthole in what the crithivemind off ILX thinks
also good for finding people with similar tastes and then seeing what they like

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

I look at it as the closest thing to a complete survey of critical consensus that exists, kind of the final word after all the other mags and sites have done their staff lists representing a smaller piece of the pie. So sometimes it lines up with what those other lists showed, sometimes it's a surprise, but it's always interesting and kind of gives a last chance to look at the year as a whole and make some sense of it before moving onto the next year.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

yeah ive been saying a similar thing w/ rap (and rap singles) as a whole this year, it seemed really noticeable to me -- rap is again an 'underground thing' the way it was in the early 90s

― tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:24 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its really has a lot to do with how rock critics GET (or don't get) rap music.

Like I think about 2010 and I had to do ACTUAL WORK to hear shit like E-40, Rick Ross, Roc Marciano, Jacka, Roach Gigz, Yelawolf, etc...

• Major labels aren;t servicing writers these records
• Mixtapes are getting lost in this enormous shuffle of material
• Sites like Pfork/Stereogum/BrooklynVeg that are donimating the inter discourse all marganilize these artists to some extent (exceptions are stuff like Lil B, Odd Future, Big KRIT)

Like I had to download shit, traverse Nah Right's impossible format, read blogs, read ILX. On the other hand The National just showed up in my inbox one day and everyone wouldnt shut up about it after

Part of it is "oh rock critcs, do your fuckin homework", but then like really does anyone expect them to?

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

ie, I had to actually DO SOMETHING to learn that E-40 made a good record. I didn't have to do anything but press a link in an email we all got when Ariel Pink did something

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

i get lots & lots of rap emails but its all for garbage

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

^i'm sayin!

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

make that point #4

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

i didnt start getting say DaVinci emails until after i reviewed him lol

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

& yeah i mean husalah follows the somanyshrimp twitter but i have to do youtube - uploaded in the past week searches to find out if hes got any new releases

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

so it's like how can we really expect a National fan to be following Husulah on YouTube?

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

imo this is a failure of major labels to engage w/ rap any more

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

i think there is a general failure of major labelsto engage with most music genres tbh

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

yah def

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

you & I mention it about rap & metal a lot but really just about every genre is in the same boat. I suppose it's no surprise that they value making up for lost revenue by going for a quick buck with idol/xfactor stuff,but you cant tell me there aren't good stuff in every genre that couldn't crossover with a little help. I know there's plenty of good stuff in metal that could do that, but the majors would rather push utter shit like avenged sevenfold rather than letting good bands develop at their own pace like in the old days with say the thrash big 4. I do feel that there's enough good bands that could sell well as well as being actually good bands and critical faves and im pretty sure its the same with rap and other genres. Guy Hands at EMI is perfect example of a guy not having a clue about music.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

I've said this before, obviously, but I think the P&J is most interesting because it's the only sizable poll that actually lets you see the votes. The bigger the electorate, the less interesting the "results" necessarily become, but the more other insight you can extract from the data. Even if all you do is wander from album to voter to song to voter to album, like you could do on the Voice's own site long before I had anything to do with it, this is a fascinating associative journey through an assemblage (however arbitrary) of brains that are at least nominally engaged in thinking about music. Sometimes it helps me personally discover music I like, but more often it helps me understand relationships and affinities in music I *don't* necessarily listen to myself.

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

Algie, I will say that as someone who covers both fairly equally, it's remarkably easier to keep up with metal than rap through critic channels

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Although def not as easy as indie rock, which is why like all good metal bands get indie praise on the record AFTER their good one

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

Algie, I will say that as someone who covers both fairly equally, it's remarkably easier to keep up with metal than rap through critic channels

Probably because metal has really become an albums genre now? (same as indie i guess)

also lol Algie

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

You're right. But weren't you the one complaining there's no metal in the singles list?

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

wasn't exactly complaining, Glenn pointed out there was none and i probably spoke a lotta shit as usual :)

Still say Nachtmystium - No Funeral deserved to be top 20, just a shame no sod has heard it. Plus the likes of High On Fire and Torche for example make great songs as well as albums and I find it strange they get ignored by radio as much as critics.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

I was thinking about that this morning and wondering about the metal songs (not nu metal) in the 2000s that kind took a life of their own and felt like cult singles in the metal world on the level of Bloodbuzz Ohio

Queens Of The Stone Age - "Feel Good Hit Of The Summer"
Mastodon - "Blood And Thunder"
High On Fire - "Devilution"
Boris - "Farewell"
Dillinger Escape Plan - "Black Bubblegum"

and like that's it?

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

obv if you include nu-metal bands and emocore theres tons more

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know about d.e.p. but it feels kinda telling that the rest of those are opening tracks on their albs

call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

I think we need a rolling thread where we can actually list/post links to youtube for songs like that from the last 10 years to try get ilxors to check stuff out they wouldn't normally. When i see some of the crap rock the goons for example like (sorry guys) i cant help feeling that they might dig some stuff the rolling metal dudes like if they just heard it. Radip etc isn't going to introduce anybody to it but Whiney you are more in tune with those guys so im sure you know what they might dig and they might check out stuff if you do start a thread on it. If I did it then it would just be ignored!

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

*radio etc

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

this thread has inspired me to put casey kasem top 40 for 12/20/86 on the turntable. forgot about change of heart by cyndi lauper.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

sam fox nipping at cyndi's heels!

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait other way around. sam at #36. cyndi at #37.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I'll just make a mixtape of all the important metal "singles" of 2000-2009 and post it for all the n00bs

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

Because no case is gonna be made from LJ posting 50 Opeth and Crypopsy YouTubes and going "FUCKKKKKKKKK"

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

the rap that i think would crossover isnt even traditional crit-rap, its stuff like boosie & max b & jacka (& gucci to a greater degree than he has) -- i do think critics should cover it but part of the problem is that a lot of critics, lets be honest, are relying on approval of someone -- critic peers or popular support -- before they can justify arguing in favor of artists. i mean, it took me a couple yrs of being like "mike jones > common" before i got a handle on how to express aesthetic values w/ a framework that felt true & correct. but imo there's a big populists vs. critic artist challop war that keeps going back & forth that seems to miss how aesthetic developments are actually operating, and regionally popular rap artists are less likely than ever to get critical support since they're neither top-40 popular (thus justifying attention) nor critic-popular (thus grandfathered into discourse)

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

so the artists i talk about are often falling thru the cracks

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

a lot of critics, lets be honest, are relying on approval of someone -- critic peers or popular support -- before they can justify arguing in favor of artists.

i mean, that's true of every single genre, not just rap.

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

isn't it hard to find people who would even want you to write about a lot of new rap music? and i'm guessing its just easier to pitch stuff that people (editors, whoever) have heard of. and i'm guessing its probably just easier for people (writers) to focus on a handful of big albums then to dive into the endless amount of underground/local stuff.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

unless they have a blog devoted to underground/local stuff.

scott seward, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

Mastodon's "Oblivion" (an album-opener) is the only metal song (unless I missed tagging something) in the last three P&Js to get more than 4 votes. And the only two 4-vote songs were Sunn O)))'s "Alice" and debatably-metal "For Ash" by Marnie Stern. Over that time Marnie Stern has collected 13 total votes for 7 songs (from 13 different voters, interestingly). Mastodon have gotten 13 for 4 songs (again, 13 different voters).

Here's the full list:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=Metal+Songs

glenn mcdonald, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

whineys metal mix would be a great 1st post to the thread, but you still got to let the rest of us post links to some great songs. Someone can just pin LJ to the floor!

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

Alright, give me a week

when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

wooo

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

will be curious.

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

Metal singles I have voted for in the very recent past:

White Wizzard - "High Speed G.T.O." (2009)
Sister Sin - "One Out Of Ten" (2008)

Didn't vote for any in 2010, but would absolutely have considered "Night City" by the Sword, had it been released or promoted as a single or focus track.

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, that's true of every single genre, not just rap.

― when the president talks to based god (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:24 PM (49 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah i was just explaining from my perspective

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

isn't it hard to find people who would even want you to write about a lot of new rap music? and i'm guessing its just easier to pitch stuff that people (editors, whoever) have heard of. and i'm guessing its probably just easier for people (writers) to focus on a handful of big albums then to dive into the endless amount of underground/local stuff.

― scott seward, Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:29 PM (45 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

what they've 'heard of' is a self-perpetuating feedback loop tho

tuomascratch beat (deej), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

I think we need a rolling thread where we can actually list/post links to youtube for songs like that from the last 10 years to try get ilxors to check stuff out they wouldn't normally. When i see some of the crap rock the goons for example like (sorry guys) i cant help feeling that they might dig some stuff the rolling metal dudes like if they just heard it. Radip etc isn't going to introduce anybody to it but Whiney you are more in tune with those guys so im sure you know what they might dig and they might check out stuff if you do start a thread on it. If I did it then it would just be ignored!

― Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, January 27, 2011 3:10 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i'll cop to having my head willfully in the sand -- i adore many forms of hard rock but imo the overwhelming majority of post-'80s "real" and/or "underground" metal can suck a dick

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

I think we've done "Try something new" threads a half dozen times haven't we?

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

One problem is that I'm just not hearing metal as having great discrete songs, the way it always used to; it strikes me as a "sound" genre nowadays, not a "song" genre. And I don't love the sounds anywhere near as much as I used to. But that may be partly because I'm listening to less and less of the stuff, and not hearing the records I might like. (A little disappointed by Christian Mistress's album, now that I've finally heard it. But Cauldron's "Miss You To Death" will definitely be in the running for my 2011 singles list, if it becomes a single in some manner.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

yeah totally -- what someone pointed out about Whiney's list of breakout songs being track 1 on their respective albums seems to illustrate that either those bands have one really immediate accessible song per album that they frontload, or consensus just gels around the first track of albums people like by default

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

i'll cop to having my head willfully in the sand -- i adore many forms of hard rock but imo the overwhelming majority of post-'80s "real" and/or "underground" metal can suck a dick

That's why whiney starting it off as a mixtape by him might suit you guys, he is a bit more in tune with you guys than I am. Hopefully by hearing stuff he likes (some of which I will like too) it may mean you can get into other stuff I & others like. Even extreme music can have standout songs and tunes.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

yeah totally -- what someone pointed out about Whiney's list of breakout songs being track 1 on their respective albums seems to illustrate that either those bands have one really immediate accessible song per album that they frontload, or consensus just gels around the first track of albums people like by default

― williamstevenjames (some dude),

or critics only listen to that 1 song..

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

you think that's the case? they turn on the album, hear and like that first song, and just turn it off or put that one on repeat? or they hear about the record and get that one sample mp3, love it and then explore the rest no further? seems odd to me.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

algie, you seem to have remarkably little faith in people

call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

who knows, im not a journalist/critic/writer so I have no idea how their minds work but i would not be surprised if some (not the actual metal critics but the generalists) only listened to the 1st song. It just hits the spot they want and they dont have a need to hear anything else from the album.
the sample mp3 point is a good one. Clearly that is the metal single these days.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

If you like the first song, why wouldn't you want to hear the rest? That doesn't make sense. (If you hate the first song and don't go any further, though, I completely understand. Hell, I do that all the time. Well, maybe the first two songs. Or half of each, or something.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 27 January 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

maybe some people just need to hear 1 song and that's all they need?

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

critics? rockist album-privileging critics?

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

heh, i get your point but a lot of rock critics hate metal.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

they hate metal but still listen to that one song? this is a wild catch 21 you've dreamed up here.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

but some generalist critics will like the odd song by someone they wouldn't normally. And a poppy lead off track from an album whose mp3 was posted to blogs might just satisfy that itch without them hearing a full album. I'm not saying they all do, that would be ridiculous, but I wouldn't be surprised if a few did that.

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

Sunn O)))'s 'Alice', as mentioned upthread, is much more likely to get me going FUCKKKKKK than Opeth or Cryptopsy, but I suspect Whiney knows this, the fiend

it's pretty goddamn amazing though. iirc The Reverend really liked it!

2010 was a great year for highly-credible pop-ambient (acoleuthic), Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

the rev can rock out occasionally

Algerian Goalkeeper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

metal rules, but it's always going to appeal to a smaller audience because of the fact that it's a very very VERY VERY VERY acquired taste, especially when you get more extreme. nothing mindblowing about the concept at all.

eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

(that's my way of saying I'm better than anybody because I like bands that sell 300 records)

eep opp ork ah ah...and that means suck my dick (San Te), Thursday, 27 January 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

OK, this comment from Chuck finally crystalized for me what I don't buy about this whole "singles" thing: Cauldron's "Miss You To Death" will definitely be in the running for my 2011 singles list, if it becomes a single in some manner.

So what we're saying, in this scenario, is that a) the artist has done their job and made a song, and b) the critic has (or will have) done their job and scoured the cosmos and their conscience to pick 10 songs whose greatness they are willing to endorse. Anybody want to step up and call Chuck Eddy lazy? He actually had to listen to a whole album to find this song! (Well, OK, it's track two, but still.) As far as I'm concerned, we're done here. Artist -> Critic -> Poll -> Reader -> Discovery? Cast the vote. Spread the word.

But wait. You're saying that he shouldn't cast that vote unless some record company decides to declare the song a "single"? Who the fuck cares what the record company does? Why on earth should that have any part in this? The word you're looking for here isn't "populism", it's "corporatism".

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

And back to the National for a second, this speculation is maybe a little silly. It's not like we're trying to imagine what dinosaurs smelled like. There are 15 people who voted for both "Bloodbuzz Ohio" and High Violet, and chances are some of them are reading this. So: Anthony Lombardi, Bret Gladstone, D Patrick Rodgers, David A Cobb, Eric Danton, Glenn Gamboa, Jeremiah McNeil, Jon Solomon, Kelly Dearmore, Matt Fiander, Michael Ayers, Shawn Anderson, Stephen Thompson, Steve Baltin and/or Will Dana to thread. Any of you want to tell us your thinking behind your votes?

And there were 26 who voted for "Bloodbuzz Ohio" but not the album. Paging Amanda Petrusich, Brian Orloff, Chris Molanphy, Christian Hoard, Corey Moss, Daniel Levin Becker, Derk Richardson, Doug Brod, Doug Wallen, Ethan Stanislawski, Fred Mills, Gary Graff, George A Paul, Jim Connelly, Joe Gross, Josh Love, Keith Harris, Marianne Meyer, Michael Pollock, Michael Tedder, Paul Robicheau, Sarah Ventre, Scott Mervis, Steve Klinge, Steve Rosen and Zachary Smith. Do you think of yourselves as lazy indie voters, or did you actually like this song, do you just have something against engaging with popular music?

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

^^^calling dudes out by their real names

call all destroyer, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:37 (fifteen years ago)

what if after they come they stay

zvookster, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:39 (fifteen years ago)

x-post re singles versus tracks:

Chuck is just being old-school and wanting to only highlight songs that are marketed as singles or focus tracks (and that category has long included indie label 7 inch singles and 12 inch singles as well as corporate released ones)

curmudgeon, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

what if after they come they stay

as long as they keep away from our poll

lextasy refix (lex pretend), Friday, 28 January 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

LOL

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

i expect better from christian hoard and keith harris. aw, i wish keith still posted here. he's awesome.

scott seward, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

Keith Harris who voted for the National track but not the album used to post here. His album list includes a jazz one and a North African one and MIA; his top 10 songs include Big Boi, Kanye and Taio Cruz.

curmudgeon, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

Josh Love voted for Taylor Swift.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 28 January 2011 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, Josh and Keith are the only names I recognize that have posted here.

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 28 January 2011 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

I know Chris Molanphy via Maura/old-Idolator, and his tastes are pretty much all over the place. Also, he's a cool guy.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 28 January 2011 00:59 (fifteen years ago)

So Bret Gladstone who has written for spin.com and rollingstone.com voted for the National album and track, and for the Joanna Newsom album and two Joanna Newsom tracks! His vote for Kanye's album and a Kanye track were his only selections that are not indie-rock.

http://www.villagevoice.com/pazznjop/critics/2010/686496/

curmudgeon, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

lex will welcome him with open arms to ilm..

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:15 (fifteen years ago)

did he just vote for his favourite track off his albums picks?

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

so that dude is pretty much the PRECISE PERSON that shipz has been railing against - and when you see it laid out like that, the railing is QUITE JUSTIFIED

lextasy refix (lex pretend), Friday, 28 January 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

I know I said that voting for a track or 2 off an album was ok if those tracks really did stand out, but he just picked 10 tracks from 8 of the albums he voted for. That's just..... Oh I'll leave it to the lex.

hah xp

Algerian Goalkeeper, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

so that's one out of 728 or whatever....

call all destroyer, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

OK, this comment from Chuck finally crystalized for me what I don't buy about this whole "singles" thing: Cauldron's "Miss You To Death" will definitely be in the running for my 2011 singles list, if it becomes a single in some manner.

So what we're saying, in this scenario, is that a) the artist has done their job and made a song, and b) the critic has (or will have) done their job and scoured the cosmos and their conscience to pick 10 songs whose greatness they are willing to endorse. Anybody want to step up and call Chuck Eddy lazy? He actually had to listen to a whole album to find this song! (Well, OK, it's track two, but still.) As far as I'm concerned, we're done here. Artist -> Critic -> Poll -> Reader -> Discovery? Cast the vote. Spread the word.

But wait. You're saying that he shouldn't cast that vote unless some record company decides to declare the song a "single"? Who the fuck cares what the record company does? Why on earth should that have any part in this? The word you're looking for here isn't "populism", it's "corporatism".

― glenn mcdonald, Thursday, January 27, 2011 7:27 PM (28 minutes ago) Bookmark

If you're addressing me here, you're gonna have to quote some of my posts because I don't remember making any of the statements you're arguing with.

My goal here has been to observe and document larger trends in voting and find some meaning in them; I thought you of all people understood that, but if you think I've crossed some line into telling people what to like, how to think or what to vote for, I apologize. I'd ask you to re-read my posts and show me where I crossed that line, though, if you really think I have.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

I still lurk sometimes. (Hi Scott!)

Keith Harris, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

dirty dirty lurkers. they steal all their good ideas from me. hi!

scott seward, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:39 (fifteen years ago)

No, some dude, that wasn't really aimed at you. The "populism"/"corporatism" thing was just too good to pass up. I understand that you're trying to figure out what's going on. I'm backing up and saying that my issue isn't with your distinction between hits and non-hits, but before that: that the idea of letting distribution methods define "single" (regardless of sales or charts) is morally/artistically broken to begin with. Maybe one could justify it by some consumer-guide argument in 1979, when official singles were the only thing cheaper than an album that people could buy, but these days what isn't available streaming or individually? (Says the guy who voted for Triptykon's "The Prolonging", which is album-only on iTunes...)

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 01:50 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah...the xhuxk quote you used as an example is interesting to me because I almost come at it from the opposite direction -- you think he shouldn't have to wait to put it on a singles list only after the label has decided it's a single; I would say that since he decided he likes it by listening to it on an album and hasn't heard it in any standalone context, isn't it just part of an album he likes?

A lot of it comes down to not wanting my singles list to be redundant with my albums list, and likewise thinking that the more the P&J singles poll resembles the albums poll, the less it feels like it has a reason to exist. A lot of times one or two deep cuts I really love are what make me champion an album, regardless of whether I dislike or am just indifferent to the rest. If I start putting those songs on a singles list, I'd lower the impetus to include the album in my top 10 and my albums list would be kind of distorted or whittled away. By only listing singles I really heard on their own a lot, outside my iTunes window, the singles list becomes its own distinct thing with relatively little crossover or redundancies. That's my methodology, and I get the sense that methodology was more common before than it is now, but beyond extolling the virtues of voting that way I'm not really trying to tell people their way is wrong and my way is right.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 02:03 (fifteen years ago)

Ha ha, I have fallen behind on this thread (and am too hungry for dinner to catch up.) Anyway, Glenn: If you read some of my posts upthread, you'll note that it's not only record companies that can make something a single for me: There's also DJs, for instance, and whoever curates various artist compilations (or runs certain websites where tracks are singled out regularly, maybe). Maybe even (gasp!) the artists themselves. But yeah, basically, as I told Don upthread, for my own singles ballot, I'm kind of stuck on some bastardization of the old-school definition: I want the singles I vote for to be designated as singles or focus tracks or whatever by somebody other than me. Just seems less solipsistic that way -- Like I'm connecting with the world outside my head. And yeah, that's probably a major delusion. And I don't think less of other folks because they don't share that delusion. But I'm stuck with it (and have been known to bend it now and then, too, to be honest. So let's just say I try to hold myself to it.) On a more practical level, it just keeps my list more manageable -- there are lots and lots of songs I like through the year; somehow, having some fuzzy semblance of a definition for the word "single" reins my list in somewhat; so I know what to compare.

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

And by the way, I'm pretty sure I've never complained about the placement of "Bloodbuzz, Ohio." (I like Ohio! Used to live in Cincinnatti! But mainly, I've been less engaged with the poll in general this year, than I was last year -- trying to stand on the sidelines, just not always succeeding at.) (Pretty sure I've never argued for "populism," either, for whatever that's worth. I just like the poll results more when they're not boring, is all. And too much of any one thing is a pretty good ticket toward boredom, I'd say.)

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 02:18 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah I think "Bloodbuzz" just became an easy go-to example of a song on the singles list that feels a bit like a stand-in for its album/artist -- although you did give it a 4 on Singles Jukebox so I'm sure people could make the assumption you don't think it deserves its placement.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

Also, Whiney said, upthread, "Like I'm really into certain rando Rotting Christ and Dillinger and Torche album tracks, but I would exactly call any of them 'singles' by any stretch of the imagination."

To which I cheerfully point out that exactly one voter voted for a Rotting Christ album track, and I am that voter. "Demonon Vrosis". It's a great song, and in my opinion it is more powerful in isolation than Aealo taken as a whole. I spent a fair amount of time and thought selecting this, and at no point during the process did it occur to me to look up whether it was "released" individually in some jurisdiction. You don't know, either. Maybe it sat on top of the South-Eastern Bulgaria chart for three months like a fetid toad. I can't see how it makes the slightest bit of difference.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

xp I don't think lots of things deserve placement! So? I've thought certain records were over-rated in Pazz & Jop forever. But I don't expect to agree with the poll; pretty sure I said that in my essay last year, too. If I ever thought Pazz & Jop should coincide with my personal tastes, somebody should lock me up. (I agreed with way more of it 30 years ago, sure. But hey, I'm old!)

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 02:25 (fifteen years ago)

I was just joking around; I don't think Glenn was accusing you of expressing any opinion of that song or its placement.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

Also, I totally support the idea of personal rules for voting. Mine, which I don't claim anybody else should follow unless they feel like it, are that I do the album list first, thinking of it as "year's greatest achievement at album length", and then I do the song list, thinking of it as "honorable mention for notable achievement at song length". So no duplication of songs from listed albums, and no duplication of artists, but the songs always end up being a mix of standout moments from albums that just missed my album list (but album #11 doesn't necessarily get a song slot), and random songs that blew me away even though their albums didn't (or didn't come from albums).

I rarely get much overlap with other voters this way -- none in 2010 -- but I figure people who wander into my ballot via album votes or trawling around at the bottom of the song list will get this little playlist of suggestions that you might be interested in if you like the kind of thing I vote for...

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

Idiosyncratic singles ballots that are full of songs that only got one or a few votes are totally cool in my opinion, especially if your tastes run exclusively towards the esoteric or outside any singles charts. Mine don't, personally, so when I'm making my singles ballot I'm kind of rooting for each song to get votes from other people, even as I know some of those songs have a better shot than others. I'm wary about how consensus has formed around some songs and types of songs, but the people that are just total individualists should go for it.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 02:40 (fifteen years ago)

But I mean, the Arcade Fire thing -- they were #3 on the albums list, plus a non-single got to #11 on the singles list. I'm sure every top 3 Pazz & Jop album ever has had some deep cut that everyone who voted for it could agree was great, but what's really the point of voting for that song too? It's not a question of how many of the song's voters also voted for the album, either -- someone might vote for just the song as a 'statement' about how they dislike the album but love the song, but that's not expressed in any meaningful way by the song finishing in the top 20.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

maybe they were bewitched by regine's streamers when the arcade fire performed the song on SNL.

da croupier, Friday, 28 January 2011 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

It's not a question of how many of the song's voters also voted for the album, either -- someone might vote for just the song as a 'statement' about how they dislike the album but love the song, but that's not expressed in any meaningful way by the song finishing in the top 20.

― williamstevenjames (some dude), Thursday, January 27, 2011 6:44 PM (50 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think you have to accept that people may have voted for arcade fire jam #7 simply because they love it, love it not exclusively as an inseparable part of an album but as a thing in itself, a thing to be watched on youtube, slotted into playlists, or bought for 99 cents from itunes. voting for an album track needn't be a "statement" about the album as a whole, and it isn't necessarily lazy or incurious. such a vote can be a sincere statement regarding what one honestly believes: that the song in question legitimately deserves to be singled out for individual attention. worrying about it any more than that seems petty.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 03:45 (fifteen years ago)

I accept that, sure. Thinking about how one's vote effects the results of a poll one is participating in beyond the main motivating factors behind how one votes isn't necessary or important -- I don't know if I'd use the word "petty," maybe just neurotic.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that's fair. "petty" was kinda sharp, no snub intended.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

A lot of it comes down to not wanting my singles list to be redundant with my albums list, and likewise thinking that the more the P&J singles poll resembles the albums poll, the less it feels like it has a reason to exist

OTM. The same line of thinking applies to my own ballot -- if I voted for the album then I've already endorsed all the songs on there, so why not use my singles ballot to vote for something different? That was my thinking this year, at least. It helped that there weren't any obvious hit singles on the albums I voted for.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 28 January 2011 09:18 (fifteen years ago)

I do a top 50 albums list and a top 50 singles list every year; this year, my singles list this year featured 11 songs that appeared on records on my albums list, and 16 songs from albums I've heard. I know not every critic has the time or inclination or compulsion to do that. But I mean, when people can't come up with 10 songs they loved that weren't on albums they listened to and I was able to think of 34, I'm not calling them "lazy" but I do think they could maybe to treat their singles ballots as more of a unique space to honor music that's not a permanent part of their record collection.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

^^ Yes. You've made good arguments here for that.

curmudgeon, Friday, 28 January 2011 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

For another slightly different perspective, I just did a quick calculation to give each P&J year since 1979 a Single/Album Vote Ratio, by taking the average ratio between the corresponding single and album at each chart position from 1-25. So if the two top 25s in a year had the same number of votes all the way down, they'd get a score of 1.0, and the lower the number, the less consensus the singles list represented compared to the albums list.

1979 - 0.54
1980 - 0.614
1981 - 0.921
1982 - 0.872
1983 - 0.969
1984 - 0.839
1985 - 0.886
1986 - 0.719
1987 - 0.799
1988 - 0.755
1989 - 0.855
1990 - 0.719
1991 - 0.835
1992 - 0.654
1993 - 0.708
1994 - 0.722
1995 - 0.8
1996 - 0.659
1997 - 0.676
1998 - 0.599
1999 - 0.55
2000 - 0.693
2001 - 0.642
2002 - 0.644
2003 - 0.84
2004 - 0.742
2005 - 0.656
2006 - 0.622
2007 - 0.53
2008 - 0.537
2009 - 0.581
2010 - 0.551

Interesting that the numbers vary so much. They've been low the last few years, but statistically the overall downward trend is both slight and debatable. If you look only at the top 10s it's even less clear whether there's a trend.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

yeah it's interesting to see how the strength of the consensus has varied, that definitely seems like something that's fluctuated independent of any single factor or trend.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

...the average ratio between the corresponding single and album at each chart position from 1-25. So if the two top 25s in a year had the same number of votes all the way down, they'd get a score of 1.0

so, where there is track/album correspondence in the top 25s, you compared the number of votes each got, generating a ratio from 0 (statistically impossible) to 1 (both got the same number of votes). is that right?

if so, it's interesting that this sort of consensus, whatever it might indicate, seems to be declining over time. wonder what might be motivating that? might be that participants have, over time, become less inclined to vote for matching albbums and tracks, but it's hard to say.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

I'm slow here. So, you're comparing the #25 album to the #25 single (and both #24s, both #23s, both #22, etc.), right? It has nothing to do with whether the same artist places on each list, right? Or does it? (If it does, I'm confused -- wouldn't that just take into account artists who do place on both tallies, whether there's 1 of them or 25, and artists who don't place on both lists wouldn't be a variable at all? But I don't think it does. Still kind of dense about what point it's making! I think part of my confusion is your use of the phrase "corresponding single and album" -- corresponding because they're from the same act, or finish in the same slot?)

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

If you're doing what I think you're doing (comparing #25 to #25, and so on), seems the biggest factor might just be the number of voters who actually file singles ballots, vs. ones filing album ballots. (Which would explain the low scores in 1979 and 1980, when lots of crusty old cusses were resistant to voting for singles, as I believe Christgau talked about in his essays back then.) Interesting exercise, but I'm not really following what it has to do with there being a "consensus," I guess.

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

I'm slow here. So, you're comparing the #25 album to the #25 single (and both #24s, both #23s, both #22, etc.), right?

lol, that's what i thought at first, based on the explanation. but i decided i must be wrong, because i couldn't see the utility in measuring that sort of consensus. i guess i don't really get what's being measured there.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Idiosyncratic singles ballots that are full of songs that only got one or a few votes are totally cool in my opinion, especially if your tastes run exclusively towards the esoteric or outside any singles charts.

lol are you really trying to claim ud b any less of a crybaby if ppl started voting for noise cassingles & chillwave 7" instead of the shitty malltrash stuff u like? werent you mad last year when forx was repping for youtube only synth experiments & videogame dlc trax or w/e hes into?

i mean i admire that u have such a consistent aesthetic but itt it just comes across like your mad more ppl didnt give mumford & sons a vote & i dont really get why its remotely valuable or admirable that some 36 yo critic votes for a ke$ha track instead of the national or if someone uses the singles list as an 'honorable mention' type of thing or just to rep for specific trax from their albums list

Lamp, Friday, 28 January 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

LAMPOTMUS

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

No, Chuck's right, this is just averages the differences between album #1 and single #1, album #2 and single #2, etc. It's just one way of measuring how much less clustery the singles votes are than the albums in a given year. Adjusting for the numbers of album vs single *votes* in a given year would be better, but I don't have that historical data on hand.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

lol are you really trying to claim ud b any less of a crybaby if ppl started voting for noise cassingles & chillwave 7" instead of the shitty malltrash stuff u like? werent you mad last year when forx was repping for youtube only synth experiments & videogame dlc trax or w/e hes into?

My giving forks a hard time about putting "so-and-so's YouTube output" on an albums ballot was about my pious reverence for the sanctity of the Album. This is a whole different type of pedantry. If you think I don't want people to vote for anything obscure or unloved check my centricity score on Glenn's site, dogg, I was the sole voter for at least 3 album son my ballot.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

*albums on my ballot

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

haha fair enough. again fwiw i respect your taste a lot even if (mb bcuz!) its so different from mine. also i think only one of the albums in my top ten had another person repping it :-/

i guess it just feels like the way you use the singles ballot is valid but any more than the person using it to single out a particularly great beach house deep cut. the only value p&j has is as a reflection of what a specific group of ppl liked that year its not historically impt or definitive in any way imo so let ppl vote what they like & not what you want them to like

Lamp, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I should stop the injunction I filed with the state of New York to block the Village Voice from holding next year's poll until they fulfill my demanded changes to the voting policy, huh.

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

It'll take 3-5 years to work through the courts, anyway.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Do we know how many of the contributors to the Nashville Scene newspaper Country music poll voted as well in P & J?

http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashville/country-music-critics-poll-voters/Content?oid=2191637

curmudgeon, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

hold on, I'll correlate

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

37 of those 75 voted in P&J this year, 38 didn't.

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

38 actually, after I fixed one stray name. And here's what we get from looking at those 38 as a subset of the P&J:

https://pub.needlebase.com/actions/visualizer/V2Visualizer.do?domain=Pazz-Jop&query=A+World+Centered+in+Nashville

glenn mcdonald, Friday, 28 January 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

interesting:

Janelle Monáe · The ArchAndroid
Jamey Johnson · The Guitar Song
Kanye West · My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
Arcade Fire · The Suburbs
Elizabeth Cook · Welder
Taylor Swift · Speak Now
Black Keys · Brothers
Robert Plant · Band of Joy
Mavis Staples · You Are Not Alone
Neil Young · Le Noise
Chely Wright · Lifted Off the Ground
Robyn · Body Talk

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

remove kanye from that list on the theory that everyone voted for kanye this year so he doesn't mean anything particular for any specific subgrouping, and you're left with a list that suggests, not too surprisingly, that (a) nashville (and nashville-esque) voters like real music played real people who have real roots, and (b) they're probably older than the average voter. that's what that list says to me. except for robyn. not sure how robyn fits in there. but everything else, including janelle, makes complete sense.

fact checking cuz, Friday, 28 January 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

robyn is pretty 'real music played by real people' for her style of music

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

probably not any less so than janelle monae, anyway

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

well, the inclusion of kanye does mean something. it supports the argument that nashville critics are engaged with the same overarching pop cultural narratives that vibe and pitchfork (etc) are. it isn't a balkanized territory.

i like a number of things about that list, not least that it includes several recordings by older artists where P&J includes none. it's pretty diverse, really. subtract, say, two of the three telegenic country pop idols, and you've got a surprisingly broad view of the american pop landscape in just 10 records. you've got young & old, club music and rock, indie and rap, black and white, homegrown americana and songs from other lands. not bad.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know, just looks like a paste magazine playlist to me.

who are the three telegenic country pop idols?

fact checking cuz, Friday, 28 January 2011 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

there's only one artist on the list who fits that description, i'm a dick to have suggested otherwise and should be shot. leave it at that.

what i should have said: there are four artists in that top 12 that code straight country (johnson, cook, swift and wright). drop a couple of those and you have a top 10 that...

dunno from paste playlists, but their published 2010 top 10 is much narrower. it's almost all indie, it's whiter, it makes no room for older artists, allows for nothing from outside the US/UK, etc.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

The Paste I knew almost definitely wouldn't have had room for Taylor Swift or Chely Wright. (Too, uh, "telegenic" or something. Even if one of them did come out of the closet this year.)

Also, it's kind of a misnomer to call Michaelangelo Matos, Mikael Wood, Frank Kogan, Carol Cooper, Robert Christgau, Kandia Crazy Horse, Anthony Easton, myself, and several other critics whose votes would've figured into that tally "Nashville critics."

xhuxk, Friday, 28 January 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah...that group probably votes for more non-country in P&J than, say, the people from ILM's metal poll voted for non-metal or the goons voted for non-rap (or maybe I'm wrong? I dunno).

williamstevenjames (some dude), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

Also, it's kind of a misnomer to call Michaelangelo Matos, Mikael Wood, Frank Kogan, Carol Cooper, Robert Christgau, Kandia Crazy Horse, Anthony Easton, myself, and several other critics whose votes would've figured into that tally "Nashville critics."

ulp, gotcha. was making the ridiculous/ignorant assumption that contributors to the nashville scene newspaper country music poll would mostly = industry insiders and people who write exclusively about country musicc.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:54 (fifteen years ago)

"forx was repping for youtube only synth experiments & videogame dlc trax or w/e hes into?"
pfffft youtube only synth experiments and videogame dlc trax are SO 2009

i turned my head n boom I saw that tweet #wow (forksclovetofu), Friday, 28 January 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

One last (maybe) note about Kanye's margin of victory. Measuring margin by the ratio of votes for #1 over #2, this was only the 3rd most decisive victory: Arrested Development beat Pavement 97-50 in 1992, and Beck beat the Fugees 110-58 in 1996. If we do a weighted average by taking twice the #2 album's votes plus the #3 album's, and dividing by 3, and then comparing the #1's votes to that, Kanye's win drops to 4th, after Beck over the Fugees and Sleater-Kinney, PJ Harvey over Tricky and Moby 120-71-44 (1995), and Arrested Development over Pavement and REM.

The lowest such-weighted ratios, of course, went to Dylan in 2006 and LCD Soundsystemin 2007, both of whom won on points but were 3rd on votes...

glenn mcdonald, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 01:23 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.