Somebody please explain the appeal of Peter Hook please

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The bass guitar is a strange beast, an indispensable servant but an implacable, exacting taskmaster. The fulcrum of the rhythm/harmonic axis, a sound that must be FELT rather than heard, the engine that must hum along unobtrusively while injecting fuel into the whole enterprise. Gliding silently or beating wings like hummingbird, there are thousands of ways in but the sound of the song lives or dies by the choice of approach and a touch of a bomb-disposal expert is required finding the exact one that spells the diff twixt escape velocity and Challenger.

So what I want to know is why do people rate Hook? I consider what he does to be a tragic waste of the instrument. WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT OF PLAYING PLODDING 4-NOTE QUASI-MELODIC FIGURES ON THE TOP STRINGS ALL THE TIME? It's a BASS not just a shitty-sounding guitar for people with (ahem) HOOKS for hands! Is that his real name or did somebody suggest it and he didn't get the joke? There is NOTHING added to the rhythmic or harmonic whatever of New Order (whom I like actually, go figure) by this bass style, except for some retarded plop-plop-plop phrase that says nothing 'cept "see we really used to be in Joy Division and here's the crappy 'instrument' sound that is there possibly to justify us going more electro because look how SHITTY these four-string anachronisms sound" which pisses me off because people have done and probably can still do amazing shit on this instrument! Rick Finch, now there was a bass player.

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 10:17 (twenty-three years ago)

OK this seems like another silly mean-spirited rant about something trivial but I'm perplexed how every time an 'instrumentalist' thing comes up everybody praises Hook so much, I'm genuinely curious what the appeal is here. I mean, yeah Adam Clayton is terrible but at least it sounds like a bass (which shouldn't matter but if you took it away there'd be stuff missing, which in a band of limited musical horizons/technique is reason enough for it being there I guess). I can't stand Duff McKagan either for the same reason, check out "Don't Damn Me" on UYI (or perhaps don't) for the dinkiest-sounding tinkertoy bass solo ever. It's the SOUND of Hook and McKagan - seems like it's on the treble pickup and they're using a pick very near the bridge so there's no sustain and no bottom end, the sound that says "Frustrated guitarist". (Bassists, why do you want to be guitarists? Trust me, we're the jokes of the culture world, strings break all the time, people look at you with a flight case and immediately think 'asshole', so what's with the envy, huh?) In fact I hate this sound so much that I told my own bass player that if he used a pick again I'd stomp on his hands. So he punched me in the head and my lobotomy scar opened up and I had to stuff everything back in my head like the guy in 'Bad Taste'

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 10:23 (twenty-three years ago)

no hook on bass = no tunes AT ALL

(he is a frustrated pop-synth player surely?)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 10:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmmm. It's not the sound that's important for me. It's just the fact that the ankle-scraping strap-length he favours effectively negates the effects of Mark King.

Microkomputer (Microkomputer), Friday, 30 August 2002 10:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm trying to think of just how inept somebody would have to be to be a 'frustrated pop synth player'! Sorry that was mean

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 11:01 (twenty-three years ago)

whoever turned to JD/NO for "ept"? singers (IC&BA) can't sing, guitarist can't guitar, drummer etc etc

"We saw the Sex Pistols at the Feee Trade Hall. They were terrible!! We wanted to be up on that stage and be terrible too!!" I wuv em but they were/are the apotheosis of anti-technique DIY surely?

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe Hook was playing like a guitarist because Bernie was playing like a bassist?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:14 (twenty-three years ago)

what's frustrated about their synth-pop? they did it better'n anyone, sez me! (well, pet shop boys, but still.)

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:24 (twenty-three years ago)

(you mean frustrated "synth player" do you not?)

M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Maybe he meant Hook could not perfect a jaunty synth pop 'do like Flock of Seagulls.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:33 (twenty-three years ago)

well in 1979, "synth-player" probably still meant some virtuoso progrock geezer, so i qualified it to point more at OMD one-finger types, which is i think the role hook actually plays (JD as rockband secretly aspiring to be nu-pop synth group)

but yeah, the total rehabilitation of synth since the 70s renders the qualification an unclarification - how unlike me, heh!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Surely the appeal of Peter Hook is that during his time in joy Division he played bass like no other fucker before him. I don't know whether that bass sound is due to Martin Hamnet of Hook.

I don't know, just take yourself back to whenever it was and imagine hearing "She's lost control" being played for the first time, that minimalist industrial drum beat coupled with the weirdest unnatural but most ass kicking bass line you've ever heard. Bleak, punk music you could shake your hips to, originality created from despair.

Sure he should have developed his style and I'd rather listen to "Lessons in Love" by Level 42 that hear yet another Hook bass intro to another crap New Order song, but Hook fucked shit up with New Order.

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)

I was meant to say Hook fucked shit up with Joy Division, crap.

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Friday, 30 August 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Dave I think you have gone mental on this one. The whole point of Hook's bass playing is that there have already been, pls. excuse the all-caps, TWENTY BILLION BASS PLAYERS WHO JUST ROOTED THE TONIC AND LEFT IT AT THAT. Done & done & done to death. In New Order songs the bass is the lead instrument, not the anchor -- the synth & the drum serves as the anchor -- what's wrong with taking a different approach to the role of the instruments? I say what's wrong with with taking a different approach to the individual roles of the instruments you Roxy Music fan, you? Eh?

J0hn Darn1elle, Friday, 30 August 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)

No surprise, J0hn D is OTM here. I think Hook's sliding between the low strings and the high strings is key, and it begs the question: if bass players shouldn't play that high, why do the frets go so far up?

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Friday, 30 August 2002 12:59 (twenty-three years ago)

The most boring thing about rock is the idea that two people (the rythm section) have to do a boring background thing, while the other two do the clever stuff.

Joy Division are one of the ONLY people in the entire rock genre where one can listen to ALL the lines - bass, vocal, guitar, drums - as equally interesting melodies (or perhaps syncopations) around a central beat. The best jazz and the best classical only occasionaly does this.

The fact that thes four lads did such great things out of a mixture of 'get up and do it' naivety and 'I want to be heard too' egotism, rather than musical education, only makes the achievement more extraordinary.

That's why Hooky is so great.

'Maybe Hook was playing like a guitarist because Bernie was playing like a bassist?'

Nice one.
Brilliant. I've ale

jon, Friday, 30 August 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Punks used guitars mostly to make long thick sounds. Synths make long thick sounds. Both at once would be a bit much. Early New Order and early Cure both developed a guitar style that complemented synth work better: trebly, bubbly, sort of discreet tones that provided fast-moving melodies and rhythmic drive around the synth basis. It seems odd to write off the Hook style for not being bass-centered enough, as the whole beauty of it was how it translated from one guitar to another: he's probably had more of an influence on guitar players than bassists -- and when the Cure started participating in the feedback loop of that style, they split the difference and played everything on the top ends of six-string basses.

I praised Hook on the "influence" thread because of how that guitar or bass sound has formed the basis for so much stuff I enjoy. It's perhaps personal, but I really can't escape it: with something like "ICBM" on the first New Order record I could listen to that punching two-chord switch for hours.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 13:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Check 'Midwest Product - Still Love in the Midwest' to hear his influence in IDM,
and for the record..... 'ooky can do nowt wrong, like.

nick.K (nick.K), Friday, 30 August 2002 14:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes yes, Hookism has totally been the template for bringing IDM back toward guitary sounds. All the stuff Dave says about too much treble and no sustain is precisely what makes it slot so much more naturally into synthetic contexts. And it's so malleable -- so clean that it can be processed and shifted in a lot of different ways.

Err it sort of strips all of the "natural" "this is a bass guitar" sounds out of the bass, and leaves you with something more like "this is a bass part for any occasion."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm very much with the pro-Hook crowd. It's understandable if you don't like the sounds he made, although I can't relate.



But to complain because a someone doesn't play the bass like he's supposed to, like everyone else does, like the traditional role of the instrument demands, that doesn't make sense to me. If people didn't try out new things, this whole people-playing-instruments thing would be pretty boring.

wl, Friday, 30 August 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)

Taking into account the fact that Dave's lone example of profundity on that other thread was a Parliament song, perhaps his frustration with Hook-y bass playing is a little more understandable...

Clarke B., Friday, 30 August 2002 15:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Also, Dave, you call the bass "the engine that must hum along unobtrusively while injecting fuel into the whole enterprise"!

Clarke B., Friday, 30 August 2002 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Steve Hanley to thread.

Venga, Friday, 30 August 2002 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Somebody please explain the career of Michael Anthony. Van Halen and New Order shoulda swapped bass players, just for fun.

Kris (aqueduct), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:38 (twenty-three years ago)

I like Hooky because he annoys the sort of guitarist who believe that they know how the bass is meant to be played.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 30 August 2002 16:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Sean C if it begged the question you wouldn't need to say the next part. It INVITED the question that you then posed.

I never really listened to JD or NO so I can't comment on this one, but the idea of playing bass "wrong" sounds promising and I doubt that q is damning it for this alone. I mean, he LOVES treble!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 30 August 2002 17:03 (twenty-three years ago)

"A begged question presents a proposition that needs to be proved as if it needs no proof."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

a) Most points taken

b) I think the thought that prompted the question was - I understand people liking the SOUND of it in a specific tune but isn't it a bit limited for people to idolize the player rather than the sound? He's like Neil Young or something, if you like what it is he does then great. Or maybe I'm just ignorant - is he the complete musical architect behind the band, the auteur-type? Because I can see why people would idolise him so much in that particular capacity but not as a bass player per se

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 17:20 (twenty-three years ago)

...should read "isn't PH'S SOUND a bit limited for people to idolise the player', because I mean this about THIS particular case

dave q, Friday, 30 August 2002 17:22 (twenty-three years ago)

As a "child of the '80s" I have to say that Peter Hook does deserve some respect for taking a rather rum instrument, the bass guitar, and making it his own. As soon as you hear anything from "Power, Corruption and Lies" you're introduced to Hook's limited "sound", but damn if it isn't distinctive.

In an era populated by the likes of Level 42's Mark King and his sterile "i'm a great bass player, in fact i'm brilliant" fingerobatics, it was refreshing (for me anyways) to have Hooky up there banging it out, a nice simple melody that drives the tune along.

Bless his stubbly, sullen heart.

Derek Dalek (Derek Dalek), Friday, 30 August 2002 17:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Ooh, Derek makes a good bass-player point: there seem to be vast period where all bass player either just play eighth notes on the tonic ("I didn't know how to play bass, but they needed a bassist and lent me an amp, so") or have an agenda that involves exposing the bass as an instrument just as spotlightable as the guitar ("it's time for a bass solo for a change"). Hook's position on bass equated to that of an interesting and distinctive guitar player: he had a "thing" that you'd hear as an equal and integral part of the song.

Dave: I don't know that people actually idolize Hook as a good player. Do they? I'm under no illusion that there was anything personally brilliant or masterful about Hook himself -- he's just the flag-waver for a particular style that I'm really really fond of. (Hence my tagging him on the "influence" thread: it can be Robert Smith playing it on 6-string bass or the Jesus and Mary Chain with their Hooky guitar solos or even the high-end bass part from Ned's Atomic Dustbin -- I just like the sound of it.)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 30 August 2002 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)

peter hook is punk fucking rock. his bass lines are great. so what if his phrasing is a little crap sometimes? (he stays on notes when he should hit a different one) that's what's punk fucking rock about him.

if you listen to lead guitar work done outside the mainstream (and indeed even some of that) in the past twenty years a lot of it has the spectre of peter hook (and less obviously barney as well) hanging over it. his somewhat wonky phrasing inadvertently shifted the way of things from led-zeppelin-blues-based-pentatonic-wank to seven note scale stuff (proper major and minor scales). this style has pervaded the indie rock genre (and all those other things like post rock)and by the way, it's one of the main reasons you can tell mogwai from creed.

fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Friday, 30 August 2002 20:19 (twenty-three years ago)

All the single-note drifting is part of what makes most indie/post rock totally flaccid sounding (I think Sonic Youth should get most of the credit for this style anyway). I think I prefer Creed to Mogwai, though that isn't saying much. On most New Order songs, I can't even tell what the bass is playing because the tone's so wierd. Complaining about the bass playing on a New Order song seems a bit to me like complaining about Lemmy's lack of a credible falsetto.

Kris (aqueduct), Friday, 30 August 2002 20:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Its the melodic-ism of Hook’s playing that makes it special. Genuinely propulsive yet unique. Sure you could have a guy up there just going “THUMP-THUMP-THUMP”, but where is the fun in that? The approach Joy Division took was different from the traditional “rock & roll” way of doing things. Somebody mentioned Roxy Music as doing a similar thing, thats a good observation.

Hook’s work in Joy Division is superior to that of New Order. Why? Cuz in Joy Division it was still fresh, with New Order it became somewhat...old. There is still some great NO tracks though, “Lets Go”, “Age Of Consent”, “Johnny 1964”.

Juan Marquez, Friday, 30 August 2002 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)

what's all this "in an era populated by ppl like mark king": like NAME ONE OTHER!! MK is far more "punk rock" as a musician — eg offends the mores of the times — than hookey imo (this is one of many reasons level 42 are so cool, they DIDN'T CARE ABOUT FASHION)

incidentally this kind of bass playing came to manchester via PERE UBU (tho whoever it was pointed out j.j.burnel's role in paternity had a not-bad point also) (chris squire also likes the high frets)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 30 August 2002 20:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Also there's sort of a deplorable impact of funk on bassists, where every skilled bassist who wants to be notable or different tries to be funkier than everyone else ("funk" = "look at the bass!"). The Hook style is one of few distinctive but non-funky bass styles that have developed since punk.

And I do think this is sort of a burning question: there's been so much effort put into distinctive or signature guitar sounds over the past two decades, but not very much on the bass end. Obviously the role of the bass in your average four-piece band makes it a lot harder to futz with, but you'd think there'd have been more invention going on with it.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 31 August 2002 19:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, Christ, the most interesting bass maneuver most rock bands can come up with these days is not having one!

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 31 August 2002 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)

(a bass is a bass is a bass) != (a fretted thing with four strings is a fretted thing with four strings is a fretted thing with four strings) ?

oh god please give me a break. do people cry about alternate tunings, too?

magneto, Thursday, 12 September 2002 19:38 (twenty-three years ago)

DAVE Q OWNZ YOU

chaki (chaki), Thursday, 12 September 2002 20:22 (twenty-three years ago)

(chris squire also likes the high frets)

mark you're earlier comment abt synths had me sputtering but this one - oh yes.
I started to think about chris squire while reading this thread: I still find his 70's solo album very listenable in places - and I've played it in the background whilst in the company of a Prog-Hating Burnel/Hooky bass fans (bass players in fact)- and they've been mortified after expressing interest/liking it haha

Dave q could you mention some bands/songs which have bass playing you really like - who's Rick Fletcher?
What's the position on the Stanley Clarke/Return To Forever type of bass-playing: too much like a guitarist?


Ray M (rdmanston), Friday, 13 September 2002 08:52 (twenty-three years ago)

seven years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkYveRd5DwU

Help Im minger (electricsound), Tuesday, 8 June 2010 04:06 (sixteen years ago)

well i chuckled

spams, or scams, that come through the portal (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 June 2010 01:06 (sixteen years ago)

i loved it too.

brotherlovesdub, Wednesday, 9 June 2010 01:27 (sixteen years ago)

Lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaKgaxQCac0

Lostandfound, Wednesday, 9 June 2010 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.slicingupeyeballs.com/2010/08/13/peter-hook-unknown-pleasures-tour-dates-the-light/

when I first hear about this I said "no way" but the video is kind of compelling. tribute band no doubt, but still.

I'm glad, in retrospect, that I did get to see New Order do a lot of JD material during their final tour.

akm, Saturday, 14 August 2010 02:30 (fifteen years ago)

peter hook is punk fucking rock.

Too bad we can't really say this in 2010, can we?

ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Monday, 16 August 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

(Also, dave q is/was brilliant.)

ilxor has truly been got at and become an ILXor (ilxor), Monday, 16 August 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

where is he these days

markers, Monday, 16 August 2010 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

Heard this for the first time in a while this morning and thought it really sounded like a Joy Division track. Except in a major key. The bass intro and the tone of the bass, the treatment on the drums, the way the guitar fills in like a keyboard, Natalie's phrasing, the whole thing is very JD-influenced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CI7IuB8ZUY

a mix of music (Lionel Ritchie) and kicks (my tongue) (Phil D.), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

"so there's no sustain and no bottom end"

people can hate whatevs they want, but this is kinda glaring to me. no bottom end? in joy division songs?

scott seward, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)

TREMBLE OR BASS: YOU DECIDE

The Redd, The Blecch & Other Things (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

invented by Peter Hook, perfected by Naomi Yang

Music Has the Right to Tregaskin (Pillbox), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

I saw Peter Hook doing Unknown Pleasures a few weeks ago. It was pretty boring tbh.

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

ok so maybe I won't go

akm, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

ctrl + f roxy

bamcquern, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

finally hear freebass, and was immediately struck by 2 things

(a) it's probably the least new ordery-sounding thing any of NO have been involved in, and
(b) it's substantially better than bad lieutenant

don't nec take either of those as a recommendation however

well hung parliament (electricsound), Sunday, 22 August 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

heard

well hung parliament (electricsound), Sunday, 22 August 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

three months pass...

somebody kill this man please

http://www.nme.com/news/joy-division/53987

livin' next door to phallus (electricsound), Wednesday, 24 November 2010 23:58 (fifteen years ago)

Heaven knows it's got to be this time.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

what the fuck is wrong with this guy? what motivates a dude to fuck with his legacy so badly? this is bullshit.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

there needs to be some sort of secure unit for the members of any manchester indie band 78-92 except maybe MES who gets out on day release now and then

― Chinedu "Edu" Obasi Ogbuke (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 14 September 2010 14:31 (2 months ago)

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

idk, re-recording Joy Div songs with Rowetta somehow feels less damaging to anyone's legacy than the Freebass or Bad Lieutenant albums

i'm assuming that it's tity boi, host of the mixtape (sic), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:29 (fifteen years ago)

man I disagree. you can do great stuff and then later do less great stuff. david bowie. lou reed. any number of country dudes. but to go back and fuck up the shit you did that made your rep, which is I will stake 5 bucks on the proposition exactly what this will sound like, that is willfully trading your rep for an advance. and the advance can't even be that big. what a fucking asshole.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

I actually agree New Order would have sounded better without his strange way of bass playing. But you cannot take away from him that he is an original and nobody else plays quite like him.

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:33 (fifteen years ago)

wait who do you agree with? hook makes new order. it's just that he's being a cunt now.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

i agree with geir, new order would have been far better if they'd kept the nazi shtick and recruited the bassist from phish

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, Geir. You're such a CARD.

A happenstance discovery of asynchronous lesbians (Capitaine Jay Vee), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

btw - this news is crazy.

A happenstance discovery of asynchronous lesbians (Capitaine Jay Vee), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

I doubt there is an advance at all! he's said that he started doing the cover band just bcz he got a bug up his leather trews about it after a council-sponsored one-off fell through, it def wasn't for cash to begin with.

yeah I'm sure it will be underwhelming at best and likely horrible, just like the cover band with him singing and his kid on bass is, but a) he really hasn't done anything non-embarrassing this decade (or rarely EVER when left to his own devices), this is nothing new and b) I feel like it's his own legacy to fuck up. kill yr idols. ignore the fat old man in the corner.

i'm assuming that it's tity boi, host of the mixtape (sic), Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

btw - this news is crazy.

crazy, yet somehow very predictable...

this guy makes pretty much every other band's reunion and cash-in in the last ~5 years look like a stand-up move

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Thursday, 25 November 2010 01:47 (fifteen years ago)

what the fuck is wrong with this guy? what motivates a dude to fuck with his legacy so badly? this is bullshit.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$££££££££££££££££$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$£££££££££££££££££££$$$$$$$$$$44444

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Thursday, 25 November 2010 09:33 (fifteen years ago)

Hang on, this seems totall arse about, smeone's made a rubik's cube of this story.

alt: Rowetta wants to do an ep of Joy Division cover versions, and has asked PHook to play on it.

That's it. It's not JD Revisited, clearly.

Unless it is...

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 09:37 (fifteen years ago)

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$££££££££££££££££$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$£££££££££££££££££££$$$$$$$$$$44444

Oh yeah, gonna make him a millionaire.

specifically, the word talking (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 25 November 2010 09:52 (fifteen years ago)

Probably not, but I guess it makes him more money than doing nothing, and he has probably run out of new song ideas.

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Thursday, 25 November 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)

He had song ideas? When?

(I'm not saying that is fact, just that Bernard, and the 'other two' seemed to have the majority of New Orderish ideas...)

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 10:09 (fifteen years ago)

these guys would get MY money if they could just agree to release the leftovers of Waiting for the Sirens Call that were supposed to be released as a separate album.

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Thursday, 25 November 2010 10:32 (fifteen years ago)

Well, come the day they all decide they are *Never* going to reunite, then it'll get issued. Probably as an extra on the 'deluxe' issue of WFTSC, like there's not enough unsold copied of that single CD issue.

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 10:35 (fifteen years ago)

haven't heard this 'pictures' song, is it on any release?

_| ̄|○| ̄|○| ̄|○ (dayo), Thursday, 25 November 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)

Bonus track 'Pictures' is an unfinished Joy Division song which Peter Hook has been including in his live set.

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)

so if Hook is the Eric Idle, who is the John Cleese and who is the Michael Palin?

Joe Wasp (DJP), Thursday, 25 November 2010 12:59 (fifteen years ago)

Bernard = Cleese, Stephen = Palin. Obv, really.

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)

Tony Wilson = Chapman

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 25 November 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)

these guys would get MY money if they could just agree to release the leftovers of Waiting for the Sirens Call that were supposed to be released as a separate album.

I think we had most of this stuff rehashed as Bad Lieutenant.

Pictures is supposed to be on some JD rehearsal tape that Hooky unearthed not long ago.

The Rowetta/JD thing is ludicrous, but I can't be arsed to be outraged about it. My money would be on it never seeing the light of day, but if it does I imagine lots of handbag house piano, whooping and a 'Madchester' vibe. A bit like some of the last New Order gigs really.

Dr.C, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

xp Not Curtis = Chapman? Or is Curtis = Gilliam?

Gillian = Gilliam?

Anyway.

like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

This still makes me laugh:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IMVEjfEAHo

Dr.C, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

Funny how everyone forgets Terry Jones off the MontPyths...

Mark G, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

but if it does I imagine lots of handbag house piano, whooping and a 'Madchester' vibe.

See, I might be interested if that is indeed the case. Handbag House version of Insight seems like an attractive car-crash

licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

xp Not my girlfriend. She thinks he's one of the sexiest men ever.

henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)

I was kinda figuring Jonesy for Ian, but I suppose Chapman could work too.

Gilliam = Peter Saville!

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see any problem with this.
Everybody else and their brother covers Joy Division, why not an actual member of Joy Division?

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

Hey I'd be down with you and your brother covering Joy Division.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

The funny thing about the Proby cover is that it was actually produced by Hooky...

Deluxe Merseybeat Wig (Jack Battery-Pack), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

actually - scrub that last post... hooky produced Proby's cover of Blue Monday...

Deluxe Merseybeat Wig (Jack Battery-Pack), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

ugh Owen the problem with this is you're either moving forward or you are boring and old. Throbbing Gristle's reformation was a great example of how to do it if you need to make a little money by invoking past glories while still remaining vital, engaged, excited. A guy re-doing a bunch of stuff he helped write when he was a teenager -- especially a guy who hasn't made any interesting music in God knows how long -- is a guy admitting he's creatively bankrupt. one need not ever grow old artistically; one need only continue to create. but creation means making something new. not standing around trying to get paid for stuff you did better when it was actually new.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

You: stating the obvious
I would never describe the guy as a "cunt" though

xp my brother just started a band, they played their first show last week!

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

well in fairness by all reports pretty much everybody in Joy Division is a total cunt

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

(Sorry didn't mean that to sound so catty)

I'm just wary of the sacred cow treatment that's been given Joy Division's records
Thinking that an unfair share of the creative responsibility gets given to the dead guys (Hannett, Curtis)
Peter Hook you could describe as creatively bankrupt
And this project does sound shrug-worthy
But I can't think of a single other 'just-a-bassist' who's been so influential?

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

I'm tired of sacred-cow treatment to, which is exactly what Peter Hook re-doing this is. Milking the sacred cow. I wish everybody would stfu about every damn 80s post-punk band forever, I'm tired of hearing how the music we grew up with was so fucking awesome. Makes everybody sound like a damn baby boomer from a latter boom. Ban the Cure, Joy Division, and Gang of Four imo

Burma can stay as their latter work's as good as their earlier

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

ugh TOO

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

badwrongfalsepeter

Fetchboy, Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

growing up in the 80s had the opposite impact on me. I'm forever recalling all my friends who insisted that all those post-punk bands I loved couldn't be as great -- musically or compositionally -- as 70s classic rock acts.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

(Hannett, Curtis)

leave martin out of this. he deserves his share completely.

section 25's latest record is an example of a band revisiting their old work in an interesting and stylish way. if there was a sliver of a hope hooky could do the same i'd be prepared to listen..

thrillionaire (electricsound), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Burma can stay as their latter work's as good as their earlier

― aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:07 (3 hours ago)

and wire (nearly as good...)

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

The only way Hooky can make me care about him again is if he should announce that he and Gillian are shacking up together.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

how about he commits seppuku with a trowel in a poundland in suburban manchester?

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

Let's not get too carried away here. How many acts from the 50's and 60's re-recorded their hits (without their original lineups) for cheapo oldies compilations? Did they all ruin their reputations forever? Hook might be a dumbass, but this doesn't mean anything in the long run. Nobody will even remember this in a year's time.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think it diminishes the quality of the old stuff....it's very easily ignored

it's just this whole period has been commemorated in tedious length via nw england's miserabilist bro culture, and peter hook is the one of worst offenders

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

Oh dreary me

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/nov/25/peter-hook-joy-division-songs

Fer Jessie the Drunk Dutch Mountain Ark (Mobbed Up Ping Pong Psychos), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

yr all talking abt the wrong late70s/80s musician called peter

pro EVOO sucker (acoleuthic), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

Let's not get too carried away here. How many acts from the 50's and 60's re-recorded their hits (without their original lineups) for cheapo oldies compilations?

how any of these acts had made auterist, album-age works that would compare to unknown pleasures and closer? I mean, don't get me wrong. of all my friends, I'm the one who cares least about Joy Division. I'm sure I could sing about 2/3 of either of those albums from memory, just having sat around listening to them back when we were all discovering them, but I never owned either one. my passions lay elsewhere. but those two records, be that as it may, are sort of monuments to the album age; they are finished works. what Hook is doing compares almost exactly to Lucas fucking with Star Wars; it's assholism. I'll only really think about it onthread; if Nick Cave goes and fucks with the Mutiny! EP, then you'll hear a proper howl of grief. but still. this is just pretty gross.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

Ban the Cure, Joy Division, and Gang of Four imo

Burma can stay as their latter work's as good as their earlier

actually they are listed in the right order above!

cure > jd > go4 > burma

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Thursday, 25 November 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)

also we can talk about "moving forward creatively" all we want, but i'd rather watch peter hook fuck ian's corpse onstage than listen to The Sound The Speed The Light ever again... my god that is a horrible album

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Thursday, 25 November 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

yeah but aren't you the kinda guy who if he saw a peter hook project and he didn't play some joy division, you'd be disappointed?

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 25 November 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

that would probably be a better zing left at 'the kinda guy who would see a peter hook project'

calpolaris (nakhchivan), Thursday, 25 November 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

why would i go see a peter hook project in 2010 ever?

xp

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Friday, 26 November 2010 02:33 (fifteen years ago)

i've been listening to a TON of gang of four lately. sounds so great right now.

new order and joy division are and were godly to me, but i stopped paying attention after technique came out and i'm good with that. haven't even heard an album after that and don't really feel a need to. thought The Other Two was possibly the saddest - and kinda funniest - side-project name in history. peter hook can do whatever he wants. i own all the good stuff.

scott seward, Friday, 26 November 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

maybe he should do a johnny marr & lend his hand to younger bands, but he probably smells a bit funny

thrillionaire (electricsound), Friday, 26 November 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

scott i can't believe you haven't at least heard republic, it is secretly one of new order's best albums (even if i'm the only one who'll admit it)

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Friday, 26 November 2010 05:42 (fifteen years ago)

Republic's good, of course it is.

Mark G, Friday, 26 November 2010 07:48 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I should check out this EP, it'd be nice to hear some Joy Division songs with a good singer. Some of them have nice melodies, and Grace Jones already proved they're salvageable with her version of "She's Lost Control".

Tuomas, Friday, 26 November 2010 08:15 (fifteen years ago)

Is this a Geir sock trolling Tuomas or Tuomas trolling Geir?

ia! ia! Cartman fthagn! (aldo), Friday, 26 November 2010 08:54 (fifteen years ago)

???

Tuomas, Friday, 26 November 2010 09:01 (fifteen years ago)

OMG

i look at the interior of my sack and feel sad (ilxor), Friday, 26 November 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

Republic is great. Probably the best collection of lyrics from Sumner.

brotherlovesdub, Friday, 26 November 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that's what they all say..

Mark G, Monday, 29 November 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)

just before they fall?

carson dial, Monday, 29 November 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

a part.

Mark G, Tuesday, 30 November 2010 10:13 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I should check out this EP, it'd be nice to hear some Joy Division songs with a good singer. Some of them have nice melodies, and Grace Jones already proved they're salvageable with her version of "She's Lost Control".

― Tuomas, Friday, November 26, 2010 8:15 AM (4 days ago) Bookmark

killin it

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)

But she called it "I've Lost Control" see what she did there

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

Hmm...

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/hes-gained-control/Content?oid=5727593

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

Whoa

http://fuc51.blogspot.com/2010/09/mani-rants-and-we-briefly-oil-creaking.html#more

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:37 (fifteen years ago)

Mani apologised and deleted the account a few hours later, when he sobered up

i'm assuming that it's tity boi, host of the mixtape (sic), Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:29 (fifteen years ago)

Still that rage is extremely palpable

PEAVEY Ó))) (Ówen P.), Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

would palp

phish in your sleazebag (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 December 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

can only imagine the titanic ego battles involving barney and hooky. its a miracle they stuck around for as long as they did, and got back together even

strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

five months pass...

http://coma-online.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Light-1102-2011-EP-Cover-Art-Released-Monday-9th-May-Joint-Copyright-James-Chadderton-Peter-Hook-Medium-Smaller.jpg

from TishTash @ Magiska

1102 / 2011 the debut EP from Peter Hook’s The Light which was originally scheduled for release on Monday 9th May 2011 and was held up due to “unspecified legal issues” is now set to be released on Monday 16th of May. The EP features the first recording of a previously unfinished Joy Division track “Pictures In My Mind” with vocals by Peter Hook and three tracks which highlight Rowetta’s unique vocal treatments of “Insight”, “New Dawn Fades” and “Atmosphere”.

Here is the official press release from Peter Hook, Rowetta, The Light & Hacienda Records:

With all matters now fully resolved, Hacienda Records is pleased to finally announce the release of The Light’s “1102 / 2011” EP this coming Monday 16th May at 9am, here at www.fac51thehacienda.com.

Although videos for “Pictures In My Mind”, The Light’s version of the unreleased Joy Division track and the Rowetta sung “Atmosphere” have already been released, both Rowetta’s versions of “New Dawn Fades” and “Insight” have been held back for the EP release and will not have been heard elsewhere prior to Monday 16th May.

Thank you for your support. We hope you will enjoy The Light’s “1102 / 2011” EP.

While the release has been announced, there has been no disclosure as to why the original release date was not met nor what steps were taking to secure the upcoming date. Therefore this publication sees no reason why we should change from our original position that we will not speculate on what occurred between any parties involved.

Peter Hook has come under some intense criticism by those claiming he is “cashing in” on the legacy of Joy Division and Ian Curtis. In a previous feature COMA Music Magazine took the position that while yes, these songs are part of Ian Curtis’s and Joy Division’s legacy, they are also part of Peter Hook’s legacy and he has the right to that work just as much as anyone else.

Ultimately, it really isn’t anyone’s business except those immediately involved who also share that legacy. This writer wonders how this would be different if it was someone not so close to the original source covering these songs. If some unknown act out of the UK or United States chose to promote themselves with the songs on this EP would they be treated differently?

The original press release from Hacienda Records follows:

Peter Hook And The Light features Peter Hook on vocals and bass, Jack Bates on bass, Nat Wason on guitar, Andy Poole on keyboards and Paul Kehoe on drums. Rowetta performs as guest vocalist at selected gigs.

In revisiting “Closer”, whose haunting austere atmosphere and emotive content is considered a “start to finish masterpiece”* (Pitchfork Media), both concerts will see The Light respectfully reproduce the highly esteemed album for the Joy Division fans and faithful. With Martin Hannett’s incandescent production running throughout “Closer” and allied to a band that had developed in stature and confidence since their debut “Unknown Pleasures”, the album came to yield many classic Joy Division tracks including “Atrocity Exhibition, “Heart And Soul” and “Twenty Four Hours”. The Light’s performance of “Closer” on the evening is also being recorded by Ronnie Lane’s mobile recording studio for a vinyl only release later in 2011. Both the May 18th and May 19th Closer gigs continue the same charities involved in last year’s event, Mind and The Keith Bennett Appeal.

Peter Hook’s The Light feat. Rowetta – “1102 / 2011″ 4 Track EP

Released digitally Monday 16th May 2011 on Haçienda Records.

1 “Atmosphere” (vocals by Rowetta)
2. ″Insight”, (vocals by Rowetta)
3. ”New Dawn Fades” (vocals by Rowetta)
4. “Pictures In My Mind” (vocals by Peter Hook)
www.fac51thehacienda.com / www.peterhook.co.uk

Bee OK, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 04:10 (fifteen years ago)

there's balls & then there's balls & then there's reaching way up past the prostate to assert you've got an "unfinished joy division track" back there

w of in the attic (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

peter hook tried to sue me recently

jaxon, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 05:00 (fifteen years ago)

I got into a fistfight with Peter Hook once, in front of a club. About five years later, I found myself sitting at a picnic table "backstage" at an outdoor venue. He was eating fried chicken from KFC, and offered me a piece (rather kindly, in fact.) I took up his offer and said, "You'll never remember, but we got in a scuffle years ago." He silently stared at me for about twenty seconds, then named the very venue where the fight had occurred (which was in an entirely different city.) We laughed and shook hands. I was impressed by him after that!

crustaceanrebel, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 05:06 (fifteen years ago)

Peter Hook is a person.

To him, Joy Division is a band he was in.

To you, JD is an untouchable godstone. TO him, it's something he possibly feels "ach, that bit's wrong, that bit should have been louder, and this song was done better at Marshmallow studios" etc.

I met him once, seems a nice bloke.

His book is a good read, and if he wants to do new versions of the songs with the Cheeky Girls, it's entirely up to him. If it spoils the originals, well they can't have been that good to be so fragile in the first place, ay?

Mark G, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 08:31 (fifteen years ago)

Blimey, the 'dislike' in the first bunch of posts, hadn't read it before...

Mark G, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 08:33 (fifteen years ago)

Transmission bassline, just a throbbing pulse, and so easy to copy. Revolutionary and still punk.

Dr X O'Skeleton, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

abs.

Mark G, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

man, pictures in my mind is horrendous.

wmlynch, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 23:09 (fifteen years ago)

To you, JD is an untouchable godstone. TO him, it's something he possibly feels "ach, that bit's wrong, that bit should have been louder, and this song was done better at Marshmallow studios" etc.

To me, JD is a band I like about 1/2 as much as everybody else I know likes them. Hook isn't doing tweaks to the material to make it sound better, he's just farting around with it for money. I haven't listened to a Joy Division record since the early nineties & am only irritated on principle here, people should write new songs or get the fuck outta the business imo.

w of in the attic (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

People *are* writing new songs, go to them and ignore Peter Hook.

e.g. I see "From the Jam" have made a new single, it is a new song, still ignoring it but you know, good luck to them.

Mark G, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

nine years pass...

https://i.imgur.com/JLo6Rry.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/QEQ6aNF.jpg

mookieproof, Friday, 13 November 2020 02:46 (five years ago)

lol @ Amos lee >>>>> dylan

brimstead, Friday, 13 November 2020 02:54 (five years ago)

Ha!

I get why it's not cool, but what the heck is a rock musician in his 60s going to do? If Hook played his own stuff, he literally would not be able to tour in any big way at this point. Doing the JD stuff, he's gotten to play shows all over the place with his son. I'm sure that's a big thing for them.

Maybe this all seems less fun as Nick Mason going out and doing early Floyd, hard to tell.

The Doors all said they had fun doing their shows. It wasn't like Jimbo was coming back.

earlnash, Friday, 13 November 2020 02:56 (five years ago)

From the Jam pretty good actually

An Andalusian Do-rag (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 13 November 2020 03:05 (five years ago)

xp a later tweet mentions that the new order show was circa 1982

mookieproof, Friday, 13 November 2020 03:09 (five years ago)

From the Jam pretty good actually

take it to Tribute bands featuring original members

@oneposter (⛰️) (sic), Friday, 13 November 2020 03:44 (five years ago)

I'm glad I've never seen this thread before (that I remember). The premise is maddening.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 13 November 2020 06:38 (five years ago)

To be fair it's not his bass-playing style or the fact he plays in a JD covers band that makes Hooky an arsehole, it's when he does shit like trying to flog "memorabilia" that was never his to sell in the first place(including Ian's letters to Annik that Deborah Curtis wanted to be kept private), tries to belittle Gillian's role in NO(he claims she did nothing in the band, blatantly not true) and accuses his late ex-wife of being a psychotic man-beater, stuff like that.

Brainless Addlepated Timid Muddleheaded Awful No-Account (Pheeel), Friday, 13 November 2020 09:40 (five years ago)

Rick Finch, now there was a bass player.

He was, but a terrible human being:

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2010/dec/08/former-kc-sunshine-band-star

Boring blighters bloaters (Tom D.), Friday, 13 November 2020 11:51 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.