Pardon my ignorance.
Is there such a manner of coat as would be appropriate over a suit (to wear to a job interview) and yet not so formal that it would look ridiculous over more casual clothing?
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Monday, 26 January 2009 06:45 (seventeen years ago)
Knee lenght, wool. Either black or camel colored is how I would roll it.
― c?ke (PappaWheelie V), Monday, 26 January 2009 06:50 (seventeen years ago)
Or charcoal. I prefer it black for wool coats, it doesn't show lint, etc. the way pure black does.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 26 January 2009 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
knee length cotton camel colored is how i roll it
― ice cr?m, Monday, 26 January 2009 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
knee-length charcoal sounds good. I think camel might be wrong for law jobs, unfortunately.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 03:39 (seventeen years ago)
a car coat might be a good option, a little more casual / less tailored than a standard overcoat -- many having patch or flap pockets in front rather than in-seam / side pockets -- but can look pretty polished and doesn't look too out of place over more casual attire
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:19 (seventeen years ago)
http://i42.tinypic.com/2n89avo.jpgstylin on u
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:27 (seventeen years ago)
elmo's right a car coat is the first thing i thought of. you may be able to find a university coat which is a lightly shorter variation and leans more causal i have one i really like.
you might like something like a covert coat which is short-ish overcoat with a v. clean and elegenat silhoutte. looks v. nice of slimmer-fitting suits but it won't work as well for very causal looks.
― Lamp, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
that is a v nice coat ice craem
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
ty dude :)
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:22 (seventeen years ago)
i have a pea coat are those really in formal
― max, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
i got a black car coat in weatherproofed cashmere by faconnable for xmas last year, it is def the most expensive item of clothing i own but i get so much use from it
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
Do not like the university but I love the covert coat, it is v v British gangster. Is it substantially different from a crombie coat? It has the extra right-side pocket in the examples I can find, and the velvet collar on some, but are those rules or just tendencies?
― How can there be male ladybugs? (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
laurel the velvet or nowadays somtimes leather collar is a feature of the covert but i think new + lingwood make a version w/o the second pocket but that's a traditional feature. it started as riding and hunting overcoat which explain the extra pockets as well as the cut - unlike a crombie the lapels are high and the hem and sleeves are double-stitched.
― Lamp, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
this kind of thing maybe?
http://content.nordstrom.com/ImageGallery/store/product/MediumLarge/16/_5477336.jpg
― Redknapp out (darraghmac), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 16:38 (seventeen years ago)
yeah if you need a proper overcoat, the charcoal or black wool is great. in the climate here, you don't often need an overcoat or a rain coat. i decided to get one to do both, so i got a black bonded microfibery topcoat that is v. plain but smart. its got a front zip, but with a nice clean front placket with black snaps, so the zipper is not apparent.
i guess it might be a bit at odds with the culture of some firms depending on your location, but not out here.
― Booker van Permalink (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
I have a lovely Dries Van Noten, (Black with subtle blues and white points) my coat of night that nicely straddles the smart/casual divide. Anything Black, Camel or Grey in wool and relatively long should do. I, personally thing that pea-coats and derivatives like the one above are one of the most horrible things ever except when worn by merchant seamen.
― Ed, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:51 (seventeen years ago)
i have a pea coat ed did u think that of me when we first met ;_;
― max, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
well hello, sailor.
― Ed, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:57 (seventeen years ago)
he thought u were a merchant seaman
xxxxpppppp
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
best image I have of my coat:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3125/3201991682_149e27a7a3.jpg
― Ed, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
im pretty sure thats a beard
what does your band sound like??
― Lamp, Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
I have a charcoal pea coat. the problem is, charcoal kinda gets washed out with anything except black
― i like to fort and i am cozy (PappaWheelie V), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
I'm also not as keen on pea coats. Macy's has this one for under $100 right now. I think it's ok -- not amazing, but I need something soon and not too expensive.
http://slimages.macys.com/is/image/MCY/products/5/optimized/440835_fpx.tif?bgc=255,255,255&wid=167&qlt=90,0&layer=comp&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.7,1.0,0.5,0&fmt=jpeg
I actually like the Banana Republic coats but the winter stuff isn't on the website anymore. Don't know of the stores will still have them.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 01:20 (seventeen years ago)
you're getting to a good time to look for coats at filenes
― Ed, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 01:21 (seventeen years ago)
pea coats and such usually won't be too good because they're regular jackets and won't accomodate a suit underneath too well. Of course, I am also reading this for suggestions. I'm tempted to just freeze my ass off.
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 01:40 (seventeen years ago)
what about this one:
http://slimages.macys.com/is/image/MCY/products/0/optimized/499250_fpx.tif?bgc=255,255,255&wid=167&qlt=90,0&layer=comp&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.7,1.0,0.5,0&fmt=jpeg
Dude in picture is wearing a shirt and tie (and possibly a suit jacket?)
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 03:18 (seventeen years ago)
I always have a hard time telling whether anything in a Macy's add looks good because they always have it on some chiefy dude with a shit-eating grin.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 03:49 (seventeen years ago)
This guy is lookin' good, incidentally:
http://www.thesartorialist.com/photos/1139Grey1Web.jpg
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 14:34 (seventeen years ago)
good 4 punching
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 14:36 (seventeen years ago)
I like his coat
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
yah the coat is nice... 4 wearing
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
...to a BEING PUNCHED festival
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:07 (seventeen years ago)
man up and get a (wool) overcoat - you're going to be wearing one when you start working anyway, right? yes, they can be v expensive, but you can probably find a much less expensive one at century 21/syms/filene's. camel is not inappropriate, but you'll stand out a little, especially if it's precipitating.
a car coat is an acceptable alternative, though personally i think people who wear above-the-knee coats over suits (which are also less warm and rain-protective) look kinda unserious, and there's a chance that you would be regarded similarly in an interview situation (though i suppose it's unlikely your interviewers would see your coat), plus you can probably find a discount overcoat that is comparable in price. a pea coat is not an acceptable alternative.
8:20 is a nice-looking coat that might not look as nice (or even fit) over a suit. 10:18 you can get away with, but looks college-y/unserious to me. 9:34 acceptable, but vaguely unprofessional-looking. personally, i wouldn't go near any sort of double-breasted jacket, under or over.
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
its true century 21 is packd full of these units
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:28 (seventeen years ago)
v standard conservative models - but what u want yr wearing it over a suit right
"man up and get a (wool) overcoat - you're going to be wearing one when you start working anyway, right?"
Not in the summer, dawg.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:32 (seventeen years ago)
you'll be working in the winter too, dawg
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
I mean I'm basically just talking about a new coat for a handful of interviews unless we assume I do some kind of internship next Winter, which is why I was thinking of something with double function. Won't be working year-round until 2011, most likely.
Still, if I can get something cheap I might just bite the bullet and go more formal -- I guess at least I'll need it again for OCI in the fall if I do well enough.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:36 (seventeen years ago)
though personally i think people who wear above-the-knee coats over suits (which are also less warm and rain-protective) look kinda unserious
outside gab's head this is not believed by anyone i know btw - if u want to find a more versatile/less formal look than do so imo u will look plenty serious
― Lamp, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:41 (seventeen years ago)
i have a calvin klein overcoat from C21 that was probably like $200, and a lighter (but at least as warm?) rainproof one from Brooks that was probably about $500 (on sale) that are completely necessary when going to work in winter. i can also wear both over non-suit clothes, even some jeans, as long as i'm not wearing athletic shoes, and they are standard wear for that purpose when the temp is under about 45.
there's an argument that says you should buy the job coat when you've got one and they're paying you. there's also an argument that says you should dress like you have the job already.
i did forget you're a 1L, tho. if you're not looking at big firms, it might not be as much of a concern at this point.
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:42 (seventeen years ago)
there are plenty of successful biglaw associate dudes who wear car coats over their suits; what they do at the office is much more important than their jocular/youthful outdoorwear. they still look like douches, tho.
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
ride the subway at AM rush hour and check what dudes in their 30s and above in suits are wearing, tho
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
i wear fish hats exclusively and look fabulous doing it
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
dude gabbneb why are you assuming that this dude is applying for something like YOUR job
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
today's look fyi: black suede Belgian Shoes, cream and black hoop striped socks and charcoal whipcord trousers. On top an ecru silk shirt and a dark green velvet smoking jacket.
this is why u listen to me and not gabbneb btw
― Lamp, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
lamp u sound v v pretty
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:52 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
pretty sure gabbneb doesn't have a job
― max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
gabbned is a lawyer - hurting is in law school /jaymc
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.oipolloi.com/oipolloi/gfx-items/1944-300.jpg
I have this coat (it's belted but not shown in that pic) and it works well dressed up or down - long enough to cover a suit but not quite to the knee. The slight pattern of the fabric helps it go casual more easily than a solid dark serious coat for serious people.
― Tina Fey's narrative bonsai (I DIED), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
ya i think gabbneb is an unemployed lawyer tho--gabb can you confirm/deny
― max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:00 (seventeen years ago)
― obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:52 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
I am in law school. Dress at most law jobs is on the conservative side; plus my first interviews are with federal judges which are DEFINITELY on the conservative side.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:01 (seventeen years ago)
I DIED that is a nice coat! i like the pattern.
― NFL RUNOFF miss u plaxico (daria-g), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
are they even going to see your coat much at all @ interview?
― NFL RUNOFF miss u plaxico (daria-g), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:04 (seventeen years ago)
At the very least it will be over one's arm.
― Ed, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
i like the coat I DIED posted but am ... about it being belted
― Lamp, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
i don't know that judges are even the same as biglaw firms (i wouldn't know - i didn't have the grades, good going dude), but you're really not making a mistake by erring to look better, provided you can do it cost-effectively.
i think my brooks coat was more than $500, actually
come to think of it, i know a (nominal) partner who often would wear a casual, short cotton jacket to work (in some weather), but a) he's a partner and can do what he wants for the most part, and b) he looked pretty terrible
xp - in many/most cases, your coat is only going to be seen by an assistant who hangs it up for you. it's not impossible that the assistant can report their general impression of you to others < / paranoia>
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
again, with judges, not sure how that would work
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
i would recommend wearing judge's robes--its possible you might trick the judge into think you were a fellow judge, leading to a lucrative career, as a judge
― max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
great casual look around the house, too
― Tina Fey's narrative bonsai (I DIED), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
― max, Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:11 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
"Intern? No, I'm sorry I was responding to the ad for FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE"
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
At this point just invest in clothing you'll wear over time -- the nice jackets I've bought from, say, APC, I still wear. and I'll probably wear them 15 years from now, assuming I'll forever stay 138 lbs.
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
wearing a judge's robe also makes it possible for you, in your newness and naiveity, to wander through the wrong door into a courtroom where u will be forced to judge a case and uphold justice like in the many lawbooks u have studied so hard
― Lamp, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
i rule in favor of maxs plan
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.oyez.org/justices/ruth_bader_ginsburg/photograph/ruth_bader_ginsburg-photograph.jpg
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
with your grades, you probably shouldn't even be worrying... you'll be fine. I'm the future jdundergruonder here 8)
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
i think this would be a good look for ice cr?m, xp
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
Think a medium-light gray suit would be too "liberal" for the legal community? Man, it's going to take some adjusting to the standards here.
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
(I previously worked in marketing and advertising where looking like a fruitcake actually helped get you work "he must be creative, look at the way he dresses!")
http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/34_full.jpgMaintaining traditional appearance with an emphasis on comfort is the goal of Academic's judge robe style 34. Fully lined sleeves, fluting over the shoulders and across the back along with a yoke constructed in eight separate pieces, help provide accurate fit and long term comfort for this judicial gown.. Across the front full pleats extend from below the yoke to the hem of the robe.http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/34_profile.jpg
― max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:25 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/366_full.jpgOver thirty years ago we learned that the traditional judicial robe with bell sleeves became uncomfortable for many judges due to the large amount of material in the sleeves. To solve this problem we designed our Judge Robe Style 366 coat sleeve style which has become a standard in many areas of our country.
Featuring body details exactly like the more traditional robe, Academic's Judicial Robe #366 is designed to eliminate bell sleeves, replacing them with a fully lined tapered design. This is by far the most comfortable judicial gown design.http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/366_profile.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/2vke05c.jpg
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/geneva_profile.jpgThe Geneva Judges Robe style represents a blending of the sewing art with the science of today's manufacturing technology.
Full pleats flowing up and over the shoulder ending in a distinctive 'V' on the back can only be properly produced by individual hand layout for each pleat. Note the apparent lack of a separate yoke with this distinctive design. The hidden yoke parts are produced from eight separate pieces of Pellon to provide an accurate fit and long term comfort.http://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/geneva_full.jpghttp://www.academicapparel.com/choir/images/geneva_back.jpg
― max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
let's not forget fancy nancy over here
http://roxanne.typepad.com/rantrave/images/rehnquist.jpg
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
brits are way ahead on the judgely outerwear aspect, though
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/11/lordPA111106_228x573.jpg
― Tina Fey's narrative bonsai (I DIED), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:23 AM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark
I wound up with some pretty conservative-looking suits (buy-one-get-one-free at Mens Wearhouse!) -- two-button, tapered fit, very light pinstripe, one gray, one navy. Boring-ass ties. Definitely hard to adjust to.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
using firm resources to play on ilx: acceptableshowing up in a carcoat: not acceptable
^^^^aspire dood
― Booker van Permalink (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
http://www2.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=353263
Rehnquist, a fan of Gilbert & Sullivan operas, went to a community theater production of "Iolanthe" in suburban Washington, where the costume for the judge included the robe with gold stripes. He liked it and showed up in court in 1995 with the added fashion touch.
― NFL RUNOFF miss u plaxico (daria-g), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/11/lordPA111106_228x573.jpg^not shown, garter belt, thong.
― Ed, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
Well' it's done. It's a charcoal two-button wool coat with a slightly low break, tapered fit, a little above the knees. Couldn't get good enough light for a pic on my mac. But I think it's appropriate for interviews without being too formal for my purposes.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Thursday, 29 January 2009 03:06 (seventeen years ago)
fruity exchequer
― burt_stanton, Thursday, 29 January 2009 03:16 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3265/3235272479_933a373229_o.jpgThere I am
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Thursday, 29 January 2009 05:41 (seventeen years ago)
nice
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 29 January 2009 13:06 (seventeen years ago)
good choice
― Ed, Thursday, 29 January 2009 13:06 (seventeen years ago)
I like it.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Thursday, 29 January 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
Is that Elizabeth Cotten behind you?
― lemmy tristano (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 29 January 2009 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
It's my Grandma!
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Thursday, 29 January 2009 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
So you're the one who sang "Shake Sugaree"?
― lemmy tristano (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 29 January 2009 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
excellent obscure joke dude!
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Thursday, 29 January 2009 20:37 (seventeen years ago)
Got the job.
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Friday, 30 January 2009 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
which robe did you choose
― max, Friday, 30 January 2009 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
congrats btw
― max, Friday, 30 January 2009 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
you're out of order
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Friday, 30 January 2009 17:49 (seventeen years ago)
http://slimages.macys.com/is/image/MCY/products/1/optimized/655321_fpx.tif?bgc=255,255,255&wid=327&qlt=90,0&layer=comp&op_sharpen=0&resMode=bicub&op_usm=0.7,1.0,0.5,0&fmt=jpeg
― Do you love me now? (surm), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
kind of like that
boring
― jed_, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 22:28 (sixteen years ago)
very
― jed_, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)
also big wide square shoulders and loose baggy sleeves. not into the concealed buttons either. bad coat imo.
― jed_, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 22:30 (sixteen years ago)
(sorry)
if you have a spare $1200, j crew has green tartan mackintosh trenches...... theyre awesome
― phil-two, Wednesday, 23 December 2009 05:34 (sixteen years ago)
jed otm (unless ur a flasher w/ a rap sheet)
― shartin jort (am0n), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 06:57 (sixteen years ago)
lol
― ★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Wednesday, 23 December 2009 06:58 (sixteen years ago)
BUMP
I have my eye on a barbour jacket but cos it's second hand it is fairly scuffed; there are no holes or pocks it's just light scuffs all over, like it's been pawed or keyed
does anyone know if this can be 'repaired' by barbour? I know they offer a re-proofing service but I'm not sure that'd work, it may do, iunno. the scuffs might just be in the original proofing but I don't know that much about barbours
― hi bianca :x (cozen), Thursday, 24 June 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/0hp75.jpg
rly like the fur coat sergei diaghilev is wearing itp
― fuck you jan stepek you kurwa (nakhchivan), Monday, 21 February 2011 13:43 (fifteen years ago)