2004 Playoffs Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Let's talk playoffs! Speculation, prediction, matchups, McCarver, you know the drill.

mattbot (mattbot), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

bnw said:
People seem to talk about this trade as if it's a given the Cubs will win the wild card.

That has irked me a little too. There are more than a few Cubs fans projecting the starting pitching matchups with the Cards in the NLCS (you can guess their conclusions).

But I have to say, if the Cubs don't get the WC, it won't be for lack of effort on the part of Jim Hendry. This team underperformed early in the year and squandered a lot of chances (2-4 against the Snakes, not beating up on SFO when they were down, giving away game after game to the Cards, et al.). They also can't win a one run game to save their lives.

That said, the schedule and injury situation are really lining up in the Cubs favor. Hollandsworth is the only major missing cog, and he should be back next week. They have a set of games against the NL West starting tomorrow in which they can dramatically improve their wild card chances. Their September schedule as of right now features exactly zero games against teams above .500. Dusty doesn't have to pencil in an offensive black hole at SS the rest of the season.

So even though I know that something like 18% of teams make the playoffs if they're not leading the division or wild card on July 31, I don't think it's crazy to think the Cubs have a pretty decent shot at adding to that 18%.

mattbot (mattbot), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i predict that al leiter will be invited back to the fox booth while bret boone will not.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Also for reference, wild card standings as of Aug. 2:

AL WILD CARD

w L GB
Texas 57 46
Anaheim 57 48 1.0
Boston 56 47 1.0
White Sox 53 49 3.5
Cleveland 53 52 5.0


NL WILD CARD

w L GB
San Diego 58 47
Cubs 57 49 1.0
San Fran. 57 50 2.0
Philadelphia 53 52 5.0
Houston 53 52 5.0
Florida 52 52 5.5

mattbot (mattbot), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

CLEVELAND ROCKS! CLEVELAND ROCKS!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Also - Mookie OTM.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 2 August 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I make a bald clam: Giants won't make it this year.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral (Leee), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Rangers collapse watch! I don't think Scott Erickson's going to right the ship.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The hell you say, Milo?!?!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"bald clam"????!?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Hot!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

only if you're a paedo.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Shaving, stencil, shaving.

ANYWAY.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

*annoyed grunt*

The Dreaded Rear Admiral (Leee), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

What I Think Will Happen:

AL East: Yankees (boo)
AL Central: Indians (yay!) (OK, this is more a "hope"...)
AL West: A's
AL Wildcard: Angels

NL East: Braves (sheesh...)
NL Central: Cardinals (see above)
NL West: Dodgers
NL Wildcard: Padres

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

i will follow davidr's lead and provide a similar prediction:

AL East: Yanquis
AL Central: Twins
AL West: A's
AL Wildcard: Angels

NL East: Braves
NL Central: Cardinals
NL West: Dodgers
NL Wildcard: Giants

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

We probably shoulda done this back in Spring...

AL East: unspeakable evil
AL Central: Twins
AL West: Angels
AL Wildcard: A's

NL East: Bravezzzzzz
NL Central: Cardinals!
NL West: Padres
NL Wildcard: the Fish sneak in again

Cards and Angels meet in a WS with a truckload of O-fence. (Redbirds win, obviously.)

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

mattbot, do you think we should do N/ALDS, N/ALCS, and WS predictions too?

thoughts? feelings?

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Hell yeah!

ALDS: Yankees / Angels; Angels in 6
ALDS: A's / Indians; A's in 5
ALCS: Angels / A's; A's in 7

NLDS: Cardinals / Padres; Padres in 7
NLDS: Dodgers / Braves; Dodgers in 6
NLCS: Dodgers / Padres; Dodgers in 6

World Series: A's / Dodgers; A's in 6

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)

AL East: Yanks
AL Central: Twins
AL West: A's
AL Wildcard: Rangers

NL East: Braves
NL Central: Cardinals
NL West: Dodgers
NL Wildcard: Padres

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, I seem to recall some of us DID this back in the spring. No credit for Homestretch Johnnies.

Of course, I generally think predictions are foolish stuff for no-talent writers to indulge in...

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)

So why is everyone picking the NL wild card to come from the West? Strength of schedule? Just curious, I'm seeing this a lot recently.

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been wondering the same thing. I am not sure how many times LA, SF and SD have to play each other, but they are all pretty even as teams.

Outside of St.Louis, Chicago and to a lesser extent Houston, the rest of the central is done. I think Chicago doesn't have to play the Cardinals again until perhaps the playoffs.

SD has gotten better pitching than I expected, but unless this Peavey guy is the real deal and Wells can stay healthy, I still don't think they can make it the whole way.

SF is still a mystery to me, after Bonds and Schmidt they don't seem to have anything but wins. Alou must be a sorcerer or something.

LA looks solid and adding Finley and Penny should help them down the stretch. It is hard to go against them winning the West.

For Chicago, it all depends on how Wood and Prior do down the stretch. If they stay healthy and start pitching well, they are in good shape. If not, I think it could be SF in the Wildcard.

Unless the injury bug catches up with Atlanta, I think they will win the East. If they lose Smoltz or their starting pitching starts getting thin, they could blow it in a week. I think Fla and Philly will be close enough to make a run for them if this swoon happens. Philly doesn't have enough pitching to click off 8 to 10 wins in a row to get them neck and neck. Florida might have enough pitching to get a hot streak going, but they burned up a bunch of luck last year and I don't see it happening again.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

AL -- Yanks and Twins are going to win their divisions running away.

I think the wildcard is going to be a three horse race between Boston, Anaheim and the A's. The two of those teams that play best in August/September will make the playoffs.

The A's to me seem to have the best combination of hitting and pitching, so I think they will win the west. Zito seems to be pitching better and Chavez has hit quite well since coming off the DL.

The Angels have a good bullpen, middling starters and even with the injuries a solid offense. I really like Scioscia as a manager, he makes things happen and seems to know to work his bullpen. How many teams would use a bunt single by Jose Molina and turn it into a winning run like they did last Saturday against the Mariners, where they came back from a 5-0 deficit.

Boston hits like mad and has ok to thin pitching. That club/town is schizophrenic, they could either get hot and walk into the playoffs or spiral into the mountain.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

So why is everyone picking the NL wild card to come from the West? Strength of schedule? Just curious, I'm seeing this a lot recently.

The Cubs have Dusty Baker at the helm. Both Prior and Wood have seen the DL this year, and it may not be the last time.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

But don't the Padres and Giants have comparable question marks? The Cubs have shown they can cope without Prior and Wood (notching the best ERA in MLB). Dusty's another issue.

So bear with me here... I put together the number of games remaining in the year against division-leading or wild card-conteding teams (for the current top 5 NL wild card teams):

San Deigo
San Francisco
Chicago
Houston
Philadelphia

SD: 56 games left, 27 against division leaders or wild card contenders:
- 2 vs. PHI
- 3 vs. CHI
- 3 vs. ATL
- 6 vs. STL
- 7 vs. LA
- 6 vs. SFO

SFO: 55 games left, 25 against division leaders or wild card contenders:
- 3 vs. CHI
- 3 vs. PHI
- 4 vs. ATL
- 6 vs. SD
- 3 vs. HOU
- 6 vs. LA

CHI: 56 games left, 19 against division leaders or wild card contenders:
- 3 vs. SFO
- 3 vs. SD
- 3 vs. LA
- 7 vs. HOU
- 3 vs. ATL

HOU: 56 games left, 22 against division leaders or wild card contenders:
- 6 vs. PHI
- 7 vs. CHI
- 6 vs. STL
- 3 vs. SFO

PHI: 56 games left, 21 against division leaders or wild card contenders:
- 2 vs. SD
- 3 vs. LA
- 3 vs. SFO
- 6 vs. HOU
- 1 vs. CHW
- 6 vs. ATL

To my eyes, the NL West has the toughest road to hoe (heh heh) to the wild card, unless either SD or SFO goes on an absolute tear and wipes the other out of the picture, in which case their relatively loaded schedules would be somewhat advantageous. My feeling is that attrition will doom the NL West's wild card chances.

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Taking sides:

My feeling is that attrition will doom the NL West's wild card chances.
-- mattbot (mattbo...), August 4th, 2004 9:24 AM

vs.

THREAD TITLE: SI predicts the Cubs to win it all this year.

that's ridiculous, the NL Central is way too tight...

if the cubs were in the NL West or even the NL East, then yes, they definitely are playoff bound. but the cards and astros bats could turn those cubby aces into jelly by august. both teams have very scary middle of the orders.

The NL Central pennant race will be a pyrrhic victory.

-- gygax! (gygax0...), March 30th, 2004.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

FITE!

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, the Cubs are also the likeliest team to do well given their run differential to date... ie, they've been underachieving, because the NL Pythagorean records (based on RD) are:

St. Louis 67-39
Chicago 64-43
Atlanta 61-45
Los Angeles 60-46
Houston 59-48
San Diego 57-50
Mets 54-52
Phillies 54-53
Giants 55-54
Pirates 53-52
Florida 51-55

But I just have a hunch ... Wood/Prior fragility is part of it. The Cubs and Astros are the furthest off their expected W-L at -5, and in all of MLB -- you guessed it -- the Pinstriped Profiteers are +9.

Pythag Standings:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/neyer/index

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

NLWest wildcard update:

virtual tie between SD, SF and Cubs.

The warming-up Giants play 4 at home versus the league-worst Expos starting tonight.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 16 August 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Bold clam: if the Giants win the WC, they'll make it to the WS.

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Monday, 16 August 2004 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not so bold, the Giants pwnz0r the Birds this year.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 16 August 2004 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
bp postseason odds report (for your rreference)

gygax! (gygax!), Saturday, 4 September 2004 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)

pwnz0r the Birds

ha ha, I guess .500 is something to brag about when the 'birds are 9-1 vs the rest of the tuff NL West. My Fish pick for the WC looks better lately.

bnw (bnw), Saturday, 4 September 2004 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, that was before the cards came back to pacbell after that and TCOB.

gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 5 September 2004 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, watching that Sunday Night Baseball game I just had an epiphany: the Angels WILL find a way into the playoffs, wild card or div, and WILL WIN the World Series. I'm stepping out. You heard it here first.

Reed Moore (diamond), Monday, 6 September 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

BONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 6 September 2004 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)

can i just ask...where the hell did the fish and the stros come from? i thought they were dead weeks ago!

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

The 'Stros have been playing below their capabilities all season long (minus the first month or so).

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 7 September 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

three weeks pass...
I was 5 for 8. Got the Angels though.

bnw (bnw), Sunday, 3 October 2004 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Predictions:

LDS:

MIN > NYY
BOS > ANA

STL > LA
HOU > ATL

LCS:

BOS > MIN (in seven)
STL > HOU (in six)

WS:

what the hell, why not,
BOS > STL (in six)

I'm not predicting the # of games for the LDS because I hate the idea of deciding a season with five-game series, particularly in a wild-card round.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 4 October 2004 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

MiR... those are so strikingly close to my hasty, thoughtless predictions that I made earlier today on a different MB that it's spooky (although, as a Twins fan, I have to keep my good luck pessimism in the mix):

Yanks over Twins in 5
Sox over Angels in 4
Cardinals over Dodgers in 4
Astros over Braves in 5

Sox over Yanks in 7 (and it will be stunning)
Cardinals over Astros in 6

Cardinals over Sox in 5

Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 4 October 2004 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

[b]Prediction:[/b]

Yankees > Twins
Angels > Red Sox

Cardinals > Dodgers
Braves > Astros

__

Yankees > Angels
Cardinals > Braves

__

Yankees > Cardinals

[b]Dream world:[/b]

Yanks > Twins
Angels > Red Sox

Cards > Dodgers
Braves > Astros

__

Angels > Yanks
Braves > Cards

___

Braves > Angels

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Monday, 4 October 2004 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

yanks will be lucky to make it out of the first round

John (jdahlem), Monday, 4 October 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i just want to red sox to win. and the yankees to lose terribly

todd swiss (eliti), Monday, 4 October 2004 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)

AL:
Yankees over Twins
Angels over Red Sox

Angels over Yankees

NL:
Braves over Astros
Cardinals over Dodgers

World Series:
Angels over Cardinals

Earl Nash (earlnash), Monday, 4 October 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I have no idea who will win. I'm rooting for the Red Sox, Twins, Stros, Dodgers.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 October 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

What do the Baseball Powers That Be want? Yankees-Stros ( = Bush country v Kerry country, Clemens vs former team, B&B in the WS)?

What am I saying, they want Yanks-Dodgers for the TV ratings.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Are people interested in an informal pick 'em sort of thing? On the MML last year we picked the series winner and series length at each stage of the playoffs and kept score (though I don't quite remember how).

I'd be happy to put together some sort of table to keep track of results if people are interested. And scoring suggestions are welcome -- all I can think of is 1 point for picking the series winner and 1 BONUS POINT for picking the correct series length. I'm sure someone could think of something more creative (a special series MVP tiebreaker?).

mattbot (mattbot), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

If the Cards and Angels meet in the World Series, it could be the first time that three brothers met and played against each other.

Two of the Molina's are backups, but still...

Earl Nash (earlnash), Monday, 4 October 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I got 6/8 (Boston instead of A's & Houston instead of SF... not bad).

Here's my predictions:

ALDS #1: MIN 3 - NYY 2
ALDS #2: BOS 3 - ANA 1

NLDS #1: STL 3 - LA 0
NLDS #2: HOU 3 - ATL 2

ALCS: BOS 4 - MIN 3

NLCS: STL 4 - HOU 2

WS: STL 4 - BOS 2

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 4 October 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

An all Molina Series would be great! I think the Cards Molina will definitely be starting next year.

The scariest things for the Cards right now are Edmonds and Rolen being cold. One of them getting hot + Pujols being Pujols should be enough to take us over the Dodgers, regardless of shakey starters. With Calero and Haren in the pen, the Cards should be able to keep games from getting out of hand early. Hope hope hope...

bnw (bnw), Monday, 4 October 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Yankees > Twins
Angels < Red Sox

Cardinals > Dodgers
Braves > Astros

__

Yankees > Red Sox
Cardinals > Braves

__

Yankees < Cardinals

Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 4 October 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

MLB.com is having a $10,000 contest if you predict the above series winners down to the game (and total WS runs/hits for tie-breakers).

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 4 October 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

pete rose just logged on

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 4 October 2004 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Twins > Yanquis 4
Angels > Red Sox 5

Cards > Dodgers 4
Astros > Braves 3


Cards > Astros 6

Twins > Cards 6

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 4 October 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

blount goes hatin' on his home team.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 4 October 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

dodgers over cards
astros over braves

yanks over twins
angels over red sox

dodgers over astros
angels over yanks

dodgers over angels


dan (dan), Monday, 4 October 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

here's a picture of dan:

http://www.worldoflongmire.com/dailycomment/rallymonkey2.jpg

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 4 October 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

"blount goes hatin' on his home team."

1987 flashback?

Earl Nash (earlnash), Monday, 4 October 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

my picks are admittedly goofy. they're rooted in a belief that righteousness will triumph.

tough saturday for bay area baseball!

dan (dan), Monday, 4 October 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Twins > Yankee$$$ 5
Angels > Red Sox 4
Cards > Dodgers 5
Astros > Braves 5

Angels > Twins 6
Cards > Astros 7

Cards > Angels 6

(tomorrow should be a fun day at work, as I anxiously hit refresh on the LA/StL box score every 2 seconds.)

bnw (bnw), Monday, 4 October 2004 21:30 (twenty-one years ago)

bnw:

$9.95 gets you live audio and replay video (NOT LIVE).

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 4 October 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

o shit, i'm going to miss all of la-stl...you know, even though i've really really been looking forward to these playoffs (and believe me the yankees being in them has nothing to do w/ it), i almost DON'T want to spend every non-working minute watching baseball for the next two-three weeks...but i'm gonna try and tough it out.

John (jdahlem), Monday, 4 October 2004 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

C'mon John, suck it up! Just think of the gaping chasm in your life beginning early November through late March.

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Monday, 4 October 2004 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks, gygaxor. I look forward to screaming at the tv and cussing at the announcers for being in favor of the other team.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 4 October 2004 22:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't generally like pick'ems unless there's some analysis to go with it, but what the hey, here are my seat of the pants picks

Twins > Yankees 4 (is it possible for the yankees to be swept? if so, sweep)
Red Sox > Angels 4
Cards > Dodgers 3 (mash-mash, 2000 braves-cards redux)
Astros > Braves 5
Sox > Twins 5
Cards > Astros 6

Cards over Sox in 7, and it will be legendary

John (jdahlem), Monday, 4 October 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Twins over Yankees in 5.
Red Sox over Angels in 5.
Cardinals over Dodgers in 4.
Astros over Braves in 4.

I'm not predicting past this round.

And I'll be at Game 3 of the Hou-Atl series!

boldbury (boldbury), Monday, 4 October 2004 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i'll be at game one of that series!

cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

You get Clemens, I get Backe.

You win.

Although, Backe could run for mayor after yesterday.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 02:43 (twenty-one years ago)

ESPN's "expert" picks
Only two people picked Twins over Yanks. Screw all of the others.
The Braves didn't get much respect either.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Twins over Yanks in 4
Red Sox over Angels in 5

Cards over Dodgers in 4
Braves over Astros in 5

Braves-Stros one is the only one I really have no good feeling for. In the battle of ballyard gimmicks, I'll take the tomahawk chop over the train of oranges in a nail-biter.

mattbot (mattbot), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously, though -- what is the deal with having the PLAYOFFS on during the day?? I don't get that shit at all. Like, there would never be a random day game on a Tuesday, during the regular season. Yet, when the PLAYOFFS start -- you know, those games that lots of people actually want to watch -- they have a ton of weekday day games. Ridiculous.

At least they're on ESPN this year. What was up with that shit the past couple years where they had the games on ABC Family Channel of all things?? It's baffling.

Roy Williams Highlight (diamond), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

well November's cold, is my guess.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anybody know where I can find official playoff rosters. ESPN.com and the Astros MLB site are both still showing full 40-man rosters with September call-ups.

boldbury (boldbury), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 06:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Same with CNN/SI, September call-ups. Idiotic.

So Jose Guillen has NOT been activated, correct? Last week it was said to be an option.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Rob, the non-Yankees first round playoff games are ALWAYS on during the day, didn't you get the memo? It's been this way since time immemorial, or at least '96 or so. Nothin' funner than "watching" 3 different games via Yahoo Gamechannel, nosirree!

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Fox doesn't want the night time baseball audience split between two channels.

If one company owned the rights to it all, I would imagine that one game would be on the main network and the other on the cable channel at the same time.

They don't start the night game until 9pm anyway, even if it is on the east coast. Goofy...If I was Fox, I'd prempt local programming and start the first game at either 5 or 6pm eastern and then make it a double header.

But then again, that might be somewhat logical.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

so...i heard the last time the twins had a 30 hr dude was 87 when brunansky, hrbek and gaetti had over 30. wow.

i'm amazed that mussina and lieber are the best the yanks have to throw out agaiinst santana and radke.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

What I Thought Would Happen (And Where I Went Wrong):

AL East: Yankees
AL Central: Indians (stupid pitchers)
AL West: A's (stupid pitchers)
AL Wildcard: Angels (stupid A's)

NL East: Braves
NL Central: Cardinals
NL West: Dodgers
NL Wildcard: Padres (stupid Jay Payton)

Predictions:
DS:
Twins @ Yanks = Twins, 3-1 (JS wins 2, Radke gets sloppy 2nds)
Sox @ Angels = Red Sox, 3-0 (I do hope for something along the lines of that Fenway massacre earlier in September) (come on Colon Blow!)
Dodgers @ Cards = Cards, 3-1 (where the hell is the Dodger starting pitching? in my pants?)
Stros @ Braves = Stros, 3-0 (zzzzzzzzzonk!)

CS:
Red Sox @ Twins = Red Sox, 4-2 (Bronson Arroyo please do not start the sucking for another month!) (this is me grasping for straws & hoping the Radke v. Pedro matchups are more favorable for the Sox than Pedro's recent performances would have folks believing)
Stros @ Cards = Cards, 4-3 (these teams are quite similar, aren't they? shit-hot lineups, solid starting pitching, decent bullpen - fans of respective teams, feel free to set me straight. anyway, I'll side with the better unis.)

WS:
Cards @ Red Sox (because the AL won the All-Star game, right?) - Red Sox, 4-2 (win one for Jim Lonborg!)

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

you guys may want to revise some of your picks--jose lima has picked the dodgers: "this is the year".

dan (dan), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

David, your picks are nearly identical to mine, right down to the # of games per series.
CONSENSUS IS FORMING ON I LOVE BASEBALL.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

In the MLB.com contest, I went for Astros over Twins in the WS.

I suspect the Division Series rosters are only now being submitted ... remember they can be altered at the start of each round.

Giambi Not on the Yanks' Roster vs. the Twins

By REUTERS

Filed at 12:12 p.m. ET

NEW YORK (Sports Network) - New York Yankees first baseman Jason Giambi will be kept off the roster for the playoff series against the Minnesota Twins. The best-of-five series begins Tuesday night at Yankee Stadium.

The club opted to have 11 pitchers versus the Twins, including both Orlando Hernandez and Kevin Brown. El Duque and Brown are candidates to start Games 3 or 4, along with Javier Vazquez.

Giambi, meanwhile, played through the worst season of his career due to a myriad of ailments. He was on the disabled list from late May to early June with a sprained ankle, then was diagnosed with an intestinal parasite in late June. The parasite weakened Giambi to the point where he had trouble getting out of bed. He then underwent further tests, which eventually revealed a benign tumor in his pituitary gland.

The former American League MVP, who made a valiant effort to get back into shape, batted a career-low .208 this season with 12 home runs and 40 RBI. Giambi was only 4-for-33 after he was activated from the disabled list on September 14.

Copyright 2004, The Sports Network

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, have you heard what Luis Pujols said about Jose Lima?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

MURDERER'S ROW:

6-0 bottom of the 3rd, Odalis (LA's best starter) is out.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

:)

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Elmer Dessens replaces Odalis on 2 day's rest after pitching 75 pitches on Saturday.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

And Fox is so glad this isn't a prime time game... Just because Perez got KO'd doesn't mean Weaver or Lima can't throw a gem, not to say the Cards would shock anyone by sweeping.

They don't play again til Thursday night, then travel on Friday; ludicrous.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Damn are the Cards brutal.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i love larry walker (good canadian kid), but he seems to be rocking the john kruk look these days.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:17 (twenty-one years ago)

The Dodgers traded away half their bullpen and now it is going to come back to haunt them.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to disagree with you Earl, the Dodgers' pitching problem has less to due with trading Mota (for Brad Penny, you might have seen him in the World Series last year)... it has much more to do with big $$$ spent on former Japanese stars Hideo Nomo and Kaz Ishii who are way past their prime.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Just because Perez got KO'd doesn't mean Weaver or Lima can't throw a gem

YOUR ENTRY DOES NOT COMPUTE:

Thread submit strings "WEAVER" and "LIMA" in relation with "THROW A GEM" defies universal logical constructs. Please try again.

ILM THREADPOST COMPILER (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

God how I hate Fox. Joe Buck is such a tool. If only they could show the games on the YES network, which has announcers who don't constantly grate on my nerves.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Penny might help them next year, but having Mota and Seanez could help them right now. Story might be a whole lot different if they could have spun Penny for The Unit, but as is they are shy in the bullpen, much more so with Gagne out of action.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw Joe Buck at Steak 'n Shake once. He seemed nice.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i wrote:
it has much more to do with big $$$ spent on former Japanese stars Hideo Nomo and Kaz Ishii who are way past their prime.

i mean, are either of these guys on the playoff roster?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Penny isn't scheduled to start a game either. They probably paid too much for Ishii and Nomo, but in Hideo's defense, he was coming off of two very solid seasons. Being a starting pitcher at age 36 in 2004 isn't quite the same as in 1994 or 1974.

Gagne was definitely not as effective after Mota left and now he is hurt, was this because of overwork? I don't know.

To be honest, I don't have a problem with the Dodgers getting their clocked cleaned. That francise has been a mess since Lasorda retired and the the club was sold. They have made the playoffs a couple of times, but the minor league system that made Dodgers such a powerhouse year after year is gone.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The Dodgers will be in good shape for the next 5 years... I mean they have DePO!!!

Really o. nate, I do NOT need Jim Kaat hyping the "productive outs" nonsense in October. He would join Morgan on the Must Mute list.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw Joe Buck at Steak 'n Shake once. He seemed nice

Dude might be nice, but he is death to listen to. No flow, no rapport with the other announcers. Can't tell a story. Can't do anything that I've seen.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Really o. nate, I do NOT need Jim Kaat hyping the "productive outs" nonsense in October

I'd much rather have some nonsense which is at least thought-provoking and has some semblance of thought behind it. Buck just sits there in sphinx-like silence except for occasional statements of things that are blindingly obvious to everyone.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd tell you what thoughts YES announcers provoke from me, but I don't want you folks to think I'm a homicidal douche.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I can see why people might hate YES because of the obvious Yankees connection, but their announcers are actually pretty entertaining.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

To quote Mr. Cibula (AKA Begs2Differ), they ming mercilessly. I'll give you Ken Singleton, but Kay & Mercer & Kaat & Former Yankee Greats = GONG. Actually, it's more Kay & Mercer than anything - Kaat & Singleton are OK together, & the two headed O'Neil / Girardi monster does fine filling the "cogent Rizzuto-esque anecdote" role in the booth.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Speaking of ming - Rick Sutcliffe is kinda chafing me, but I am notoriously hard to please.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)

2 laughers so far today...hopefully Twins/Yanks tonight will be more interesting to the non-homers in the viewing audience.

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

tony gwynn is so cute with his high squeaky voice!

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

They don't play again til Thursday night, then travel on Friday; ludicrous.
Yeah, this is stupid. This is why the DBack won the WS in 2001 -- they were the one lucky team that ended up with this schedule, which allowed them to pitch Johnson and Schilling twice each in a five game series against the Cards.

We'll proabably want to have Rolling Playoff threads for each series ... or wait until the LCS?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

doesn't tony gwynn sound like eddie murphy impersonating a white guy?

gosh...i thought joe buck and tim "i am derek jeter's father" mccarver moonlighted as yes announcers.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Looks like the first round of Manny vs. Vladimir is all Manny. Although the Angels scored ten runs in one inning what twice? three times? in the playoffs two years ago so maybe I shouldn't speak so soon.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

They didn't score ten runs off a Curt Schilling in the playoffs. This game is over.

I wonder if Francona is smart enough to pull Schilling after six so that he can pitch in game four just in case?

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Wouldn't that give the Angels the opportunity to score the ten runs off someone else though?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I know Felix Rodriguez. Curt Schilling is no Felix Rodriguez.

Earl writes:
Penny isn't scheduled to start a game either.

True, but you can't forecast injury. Decline is much easier to predict.

Gagne was definitely not as effective after Mota left and now he is hurt, was this because of overwork? I don't know.

None have the Dodger pitchers have been effective since LoDuca left. David Ross and Brent Mayne might not be calling the game that he did.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

THANK YOU DALLAS MCPHERSON

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

So if the Twins are up 2-1 in games going into game 4, do you still pitch Santana?

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Santana
Radke
Silva
(Lohse?)

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. Yes you do.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Series at a Glance

Series tied 0-0

Game 1: at NYY - Preview
Tue, Oct 5 - 8:05 pm EDT
TV: FOX
J. Santana vs. M. Mussina

Game 2: at NYY
Wed, Oct 6 - 7:05 pm EDT
TV: ESPN
B. Radke vs. J. Lieber

Game 3: at MIN
Fri, Oct 8 - 8:05 pm EDT
TV: ESPN
O. Hernández vs. C. Silva

*Game 4: at MIN
Sat, Oct 9 - TBA
TV: FOX
J. Vázquez vs. J. Santana

*Game 5: at NYY
Sun, Oct 10 - TBA
TV: FOX
B. Radke vs. M. Mussina

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

day games are for the European market, obv.

i LOVE joe girardi as a strategy inside-the-game guy. he's so tender. his commentary is like willie nelson singing.

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)

and i like joe buck too. clever bombast would be so much worse than the type of bombast he does.

You've Got to Pick Up Every Stitch (tracerhand), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the 3 days rest that makes it rather eye-popping to pitch Santana in game 4.

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

The thing I've noticed about Johan is that he totally neutralizes even MONSTER offenses like the Yanquis who live and die by the DING DONG.

How many balls have been hit to the MIN infield? With guys on base? 3 Double plays through 6 tonight. 1 Fielder's choice.

Not to mention Minnesota's defense has been spectacular: outfield assists (at home no less), caught stealings, 3 double plays, etc.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

well, the CS was just a dumb call and a dumb play (how could bernie take that pitch???). i agreed w/ sending jorge though. the DPs have mostly been hard shots right at people, which is obv frustrating.

santana hasn't impressed me, really. he hasn't allowed a home run and there's a lot to be said for that, but his control took a little while to come round and he's been really, really lucky. definitely not at his best, and the yankees should be leading.

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

He hasn't been at his best no doubt. But you don't shut out the Yanks for 6 innings...

(I was going to say.)

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:32 (twenty-one years ago)

The Santana-Sheff AB in the 6th was sweeeeet.

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Mo Rivera pitching top of the 9th with the Yanqs down 2, hmmm.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe the Yanqs are hoping that the Joe Nathan who blew 2 games for SF in the NLDS last year shows up.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 01:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow! Yankees are shut out!

boldbury (boldbury), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I missed almost 90 minutes of this game due to the VP debates, and it doesn't sound like I missed much.

Somebody help a brutha out: how have the Yankees won so many games with so many guys below .300?

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I tell you. So much attention on Santana and this unspoken "given" that the Twins would be leaning heavily on his pitching, it was sort of comforting to see the defense give him some (make that hellalotta) back-up on that count.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)

>Somebody help a brutha out: how have the Yankees won so many games >with so many guys below .300?

walks and home runs, and a good back of the bullpen (their rotation being the real weakness)


i'll give the twins D their due, but they still got really fucking lucky.

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Yanquis were lucky to get 9 hits off Johan

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

ESPN radio said he was tipping his pitches.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

From what I saw Santana would look unhittable one minute and then just groove a fastball the next. Cold hands maybe?

The Yanks were so un-clutch tonite.

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate both of these teams, so I want the series to go 5 games, with the remaining 4 games each lasting 15 innings.

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

not really, gear, unless you mean they were lucky to catch santana not at his best. he only struck out 18% of batters faced, compared to 31% for the year and god knows how many since the ASB. it was his highest hits allowed total and lowest strikeout total since may 23.

the assertion that he was tipping his pitches is preposterous, unless it was sporadic. the yanks looked off-balance all night, and though i've only seen santana once (and not for long at that as i think i turned the game off in disgust) his only major problem looked like difficulty spotting his pitches in the early going. i'd think he might've thrown the change a little more, i dunno, but it didn't look compromised or anything when he did. the yankees weren't getting cheap hits, either, and i didn't really feel like keeping track of how many balls they whacked right to the shortstop or second baseman.

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

after the game, torii hunter agreed with the announcers without any hesitation that it looked like santana was tipping his pitches. he wouldn't say how, but that assertation did not strike him as off-base at all. he mentioned that he saw that santana was doing "something" and that he was going to talk to him about it.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Wouldn't it be hard for Hunter to see if Santana was tipping his pitches from center field? He's looking at the back of the pitcher whereas the batter sees the front.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Berman has got to go. Loved the game but can't stand listening to that fat shit recite his chicken call every time someone hits a homerun. Go Sox.

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"Chicken call," nice. I watched the first few innings of Bos-Ana on tape, and Sutcliffe was abominable per usual... Defense Matters Most, the Fallacy of the Predetermined Hit (Gwynn joined in on that) ... pure puke.

BBT, you gave up 90 minutes of a primo playoff pitching duel to watch two guys pander to Israel and homophobes?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm guilty of that, too, Morb, though I did the GIGO shuffle when it came to those two topics (and the "oh geez shut up" responses offered). Who were the Foxy guys doing the Yanks / Twins game?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Wouldn't it be hard for Hunter to see if Santana was tipping his pitches from center field? He's looking at the back of the pitcher whereas the batter sees the front.

ESPN Radio mentioned something about his grip and glove position. The batter can't see the grip, but Torii has a pretty good idea where the pitch is going after seeing the grip from behind.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

my fave dumb announcer moment yesterday was McCarver saying late "at this point in the game, a walk is as good as a homerun." Uh, no, it isn't, esp. when the team at bat had hit into a record-high amount of double plays.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

also Berman on the "shame" of MLB's treatment of Montreal was hilarious since the '94 player strike prolly was as much a factor as anything in helping to kill the viability of the Expos franchise (Gwynn and Sutcliffe didn't/couldn't say much). Not that I'm a fan of MLB or the owners, but there's plenty of blame on all sides.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Wasn't Berman mostly quoting Orlando Cabrera? Why h, are you turning into a Company Man? Sorry, the (owner-engineered) '94 strike didn't seal the deal the way Jeffrey Loria's scorched-earth ownership did.

Last night I dozed off around the 7th inning... I assume McCarver was talking about getting the tying run on, so I appreciate the general point, which is preferable to dum-dum fans cheering a sacrifice fly with one out in the 9th several runs down.

Mystique and Aura vulnerable to a pitch-tipping Santana?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, the (owner-engineered) '94 strike didn't seal the deal the way Jeffrey Loria's scorched-earth ownership did.
Totally otm. Although the fire sale of the '94 team had already been completed, and the team was well into the doldrums before Loria took over. But things were recoverable until Loria came along and put a bullet in the head of the franchise, no question.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I missed almost 90 minutes of this game due to the VP debates, and it doesn't sound like I missed much.

On the contrary, you couldn't ask much more of playoff game from a spectator's standpoint. Yanks had runners on in every inning until Nathan went 1-2-3 in the ninth, Torii threw out a runner at the plate & made a fine leaping catch at the wall, Sierra launched two near-homers, & Jones' homer was high drama. Mussina & Santana both pitched great, gritty games. Torre got burned on gutsy baserunning gambits, Gardenhire scored on a single-sacrifice-single. I was completely hooked until the final out.

briania (briania), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Morbs please read what I wrote! I'm not a company man! And c'mon, I don't think Loria would've even happened had the Expos ended the '94 season with the best record, much less had they won the World Series. Players obv. have a right to strike too, but let's be honest: the MLBPA is nothing like any other labor organization in this country, and baseball players are not very high on my list of sympathetic workers of the glorious proletariat or whatever. But that's for another thread.

Also, McCarver wasn't talking about the tying run, since the Yankees were down 2-0.

And one last "controversial" point: it'd be better if there were threads for each playoff series, instead of one big playoff thread. Just my preference.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Agreed, I suggested the same. I'll start those threads now ...

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Make it so.

boldbury (boldbury), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I know you're not a unionbuster, 'Stenc, but the MLBPA pretty much look like the Molly Maguires in the context of the Lords of Baseball's constant delusions that it's 1955. (Read that Marvin Miller book sometime, even skeptically.)

But wasn't McCarver-Jeter saying a walk *ahead* of the tying run was as good as a HR? (granted, not quite)

[MOD: LOCKED - see playoff specific threads]

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.