giants roster [aka all things GIANTS thread]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
with rich aurilla on his way to seattle (apparently) what/if any move are the giants looking to make to fill the void? are they banking on cody ransom at this point?

and, now that worrell is gone, does that tell us that robb nen is expected to return to form? after the season worrell had i was surprised to see him go.

metfigga (metfigga), Thursday, 8 January 2004 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

neifi perez at SS. gold glove but abyssmal patience at the plate. he is considered by some statheads to be the worst hitter in the MLB. although he's hitting well in the winter leagues, someone pointed out (see the January 7th entry) that he hit even better last year.

sabean is good at picking up pieces. he had a streak of bad luck last winter picking up durham (injury plagued), cruz (minor league offensively), and alfonzo (ice cold through the all-star break). he may surprise the giants fans by st. valentine's day.

nen is supposedly throwing albeit not hard. i'd be suprised if he doesn't lose 5mph off his fastaball considering he had the same surgery twice in 6 months.

worrell became unaffordable. i agree with sabean, he was a great stand-in, but with his contract up, he priced himself out of the giants current budget. they resigned matt herges who proved to be a more effective pitcher than worrell last season.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 8 January 2004 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

and don't forget my pick for NL Cy Young jason schmidt (who pitched the last 7 weeks of the season with a torn tendon not allowing him to throw any breaking pitches) is recovering from surgery to repair the tendon and is hopeful for opening day.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 8 January 2004 23:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Your pick?! He was mine! Hands off!

Leee Smith (Leee), Friday, 9 January 2004 03:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I forgot about Neifi, he's not a bad replacement considering the boost you get on the defensive side coupled with the fact that Richie Rich had been slipping offensively ever since his monster season a couple years ago.

The Giants are really leaning heavily on pitching this year and I guess that should be fine considering the nice mix of youth and experience they've got on the mound. Hopefully Alfonzo can pick up where he left off at the end of last year. I'm pretty excited to see what A.J. Pierzsomethingorother can do.

metfigga (metfigga), Friday, 9 January 2004 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Richie had some eyes/contacts issues that plagued in the first half of 03. But he's not the player he was on 01 that's for damn sure.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 9 January 2004 20:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Not that Ponson was a "winner" as a Giant, but I bet you people are not happy that he went right back to Baltimore.

When that thing happens, it is loan, not a trade.

earlnash, Thursday, 15 January 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually not at all surprised by this earlnash. GM Sabean said pretty much as soon as the season ended that the Giants were no longer interested in Ponson.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 15 January 2004 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, it kind of hurts that we got nothing out of giving up Ainsworth now, but where Cartman went isn't a big deal.

Leee Majors (Leee), Friday, 16 January 2004 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

The reloading continues.

Leee Majors (Leee), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

those are just post-arbitration filings Leee. No news except for $$$ negotiation.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 20 January 2004 19:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Best Giants news all offseasn. Albatross begone!

Leee Majors (Leee), Thursday, 22 January 2004 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)

starters remaining from the 2002 world series squad:
1 outfielder = barry bonds
1 infielder = jt snow (barely, will be battling pedro feliz for starter role at 1B)
2 starting pitchers = jason schmidt and kurt rueter

and people badmouth the marlins for dismantling their teams.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 January 2004 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

the giants (sabean) have no rival when it comes to adding and subtracting in the offseason, not to mention the deadline deals that have been made during sabeans tenure. each spring sf brings in a host of new veterans that plug the holes left by the veterans who were released after the previous season. i hate to say it, but something about it doesn't feel right, like it's going to catch up with them eventually.

i mean, how many times can you expect to bring in a guy like ellis burks, santiago, lofton, big cat, and have them perform the way they have as giants. for some reason, the seemingly banged up, past their prime vets always produce when they come to sf.

metfigga (metfigga), Thursday, 22 January 2004 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)

That description could just as easily apply to the A's -- suggesting perhaps there is method to Sabean's madness.

Leee Majors (Leee), Friday, 23 January 2004 07:00 (twenty-two years ago)

so the question is, are sabean and beane that much better at evaluating talent than the other 28 gm's in the league?

metfigga (metfigga), Friday, 23 January 2004 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)

the difference between beane and sabean is about $40MM. Beane would have a few rings if he had the Giants budget.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

other "moneyball"/SABR-friendly teams other than oakland:
toronto
boston

others i've heard are adapting:
minnesota
san diego
milwaukee (?)

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I wasn't suggesting that Sabean is as into saber"hagen"metrics as BeaneCo, just that he maybe has a long/medium term plan. As for talent evaluation, I think he hits more than he whiffs, last year excepted.

Leee Majors (Leee), Friday, 23 January 2004 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)

let's not be concerned with comparing beane and sabean, i'm more interested in what is that separates those two from the rest of the gm's in the league.

obviously oakland has had the pitching to keep them competitive for the last five years despite losing high-profile allstars. the giants have had a healthy budget and one constant superstar to assist their prolonged success. it just seems like there are so few teams that are consistently having as much success as the a's and the giants (regular season wise of course). how much of that is attributable to beane and sabean? and why aren't there more teams (outside of the yankees, braves, red sox, and mariners) that can play for a division title consistently over a period of four to five years as the giants and a's have lately?

metfigga (metfigga), Saturday, 24 January 2004 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"why aren't there more teams (outside of the yankees, braves, red sox, and mariners) that can play for a division title consistently over a period of four to five years as the giants and a's have lately?"

Money, minor leagues and pitching.

The A's minor leagues turned out a series of good pitchers (and a few good position players), which helped keep the budget down.

When the minors are not turning out quality players and you don't have a budget, your team will not be very good.

The last quality starter the Detroit Tigers minor leagues turned out was John Smoltz and they gave him away a LONG time ago.

The Dodgers were good for so long because their minor leagues turned out quality players. The magic faded away right around the time they were sold and guess what, they haven't been worth a crap since (not that I am crying, I hate the Dodgers).

NY and Boston have been able to buy whatever they needed. Atlanta turned out some quality players and gained the ability to buy what was needed.

SF and to a lesser extent St.Louis have found some players off the scrap pile and get good years from them, some for a few years.

Oakland seems to be able to pick out players that languish off of other teams bench and turn them into viable everyday players, but the biggest part of their success is their minor leagues turned out quite a few quality players (Giambi, Tejada, Chavez, Hudson, Mulder, & Zito). I think this has been overlooked a bit, if your minors develop two MVPs and three top notch starters within a few years, your team better win.

earlnash, Sunday, 25 January 2004 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)

nen's career still questionable...

so... can felix rodriguez and matt herges fill in for nathan/worrell?

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)

internship opportunities with the SF Giants

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Dayam!

*updates resume*

Leee Majors (Leee), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)

The posting's spelling mistakes aside, this looks totally up my alley. Do you think they want a cover letter too?

Leee Majors (Leee), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

i have a friend who did it last season and now she's a paid employee with benefits!*

*the benefits of the internship: free attendance to all home games (well you're "working" but it's pretty mellow).

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Pedro Feliz to platoon at 1B/SS (don't count out 3B/LF/RF, three other positions he covered in '03)

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 6 February 2004 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Giants stealthing out Maddux? Just another false lead, I'm sure, to get our hopes up this offseason.

Leee Majors (Leee), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

no cash = no way!

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Leee may be onto something:

News
Count the San Francisco Giants among the teams speaking with free agent pitcher Greg Maddux. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the Giants and Maddux's agent, Scott Boras, have been talking all winter and have exchanged dollar figures on a multiyear deal. Maddux is expected to make a decision soon, perhaps even as soon as this weekend. Other teams trying to lure Maddux include the Cubs, Dodgers, and Cardinals. One source familiar with the situation told the Chronicle that the Giants "have a ways to go" before matching the dollars offered by other teams.

Views
The thinking is that Maddux may accept a little less to sign with the Giants because they are a perennial playoff contender and play in a pitcher-friendly ballpark. Being on the west coast might also help, as Maddux grew up and went to school in Las Vegas.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 13 February 2004 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)

i think his decision will be based solely on who offers the most money. my gut tells me he'll be in dodger blue next year.

if he signs with the cubs this city is going to wet it's collective pants.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 13 February 2004 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Pierzynski wins arbitration

but more notable:

Pierzynski said he's been in Arizona for about a week and now looks forward to talking only baseball. He said he's watched pitchers Robb Nen and Jason Schmidt, both coming off injuries, work out at the team's Scottsdale facility.

"I've seen them throw and they look good," Pierzynski said. "Both look healthy and ready to go."

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 19 February 2004 22:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Have you seen the kid that the Dodgers have hired as GM? He is either a genius or has been riding on Beane's coattails.

SF is definitely lucky to be in the west, as really only Arizona looks like they may be improved from the off season.

Arizona will do as well as Randy Johnson, if he is back to normal, they may make a run. If not, I doubt they have much chance.

earlnash, Thursday, 19 February 2004 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)

earl, have you read moneyball? depodesta was portrayed as the left half of beane's brain, iirc. i think he'll do fine.

John (jdahlem), Friday, 20 February 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Have you seen the kid that the Dodgers have hired as GM? He is either a genius or has been riding on Beane's coattails.

what John said. Paul Depodesta makes Theo Epstein look like Paris Hilton on Final Jeopardy. He's been working baseball ever since his graduation day from Harvard, spending 5 years with the Indians and 5 with the A's. Very influential in baseball business circles and has helped usher along "the new thinking in baseball" tremendously, esp. wrt his high profile in Lewis' Moneyball. Rob Neyer devoted a whole column on Paul this week on Espn.com which I would definitely recommend reading.

SF is definitely lucky to be in the west, as really only Arizona looks like they may be improved from the off season.

Earl, you're ignoring the Padres who are many folx darkhorse shot at the world series this year.

Arizona will do as well as Randy Johnson, if he is back to normal, they may make a run. If not, I doubt they have much chance.

I saw Brandon Webb pitch twice (I also saw Dontrelle twice as well) and Webb was not only the better rookie, but also one of the most impressive opponents facing the Giants last year. If the D-Backs could give him some run support, they might be saying "Schilling who?" by August.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 20 February 2004 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

San Diego's starting staff looks shaky. Their starting line up has potential and at least going by the stats, the bullpen might not be too bad if Hoffman can come back from injury.

It would take a whole lot of things coming in line at once for them to make a run. Of course, the couple of times the Padres had real good clubs it happened that way.

I don't doubt that Webb is for real, but I think the Diamondbacks are at best a .500 club without the Big Unit winning 15-20 games. If Johnson was healthy last year, they definitely would have been much closer to the Giants than where they finished.

The NL West is pretty open, I think the division could maybe be won by a team with only 90 wins or so, unless there are suprises. As long as the Giants stay healthy, I think they are the team to beat.

earlnash, Friday, 20 February 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
this may be the slowest team in the modern era... any challenges to that?

gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 7 March 2004 01:18 (twenty-two years ago)

JT Snow: Hell on (Training) Wheels

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

this may be the slowest team in the modern era... any challenges to that?


1983 red sox. they couldn't/wouldn't/didn't run from the time jerry remy blew out his knee until ellis burks showed up a decade later.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Please note that Burks had 90% (+/- 10%) of his team's stolen bases every year he was w/ the Sox.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Not quite but it sure seemed that way, didn't it?

1987: Burks 27 Team: 77 (Second highest- Marty Barrett 15)
1988: Burks 25 Team: 65 (Second highest- Mike Greenwell 16)
1989: Burks 21 Team: 56 (Second highest- Mike Greenwell 13)
1990: Burks 9 Team: 53 (Second highest- Mike Greenwell & Tony Pena[!] 8)
1991: Burks 6 Team: 59 (Team Leaders- Mike Greenwell 15, Steve Lyons 10, Tony Pena 8, Jody Reed 6)
1992: Burks 5 Team: 44 (Team Leders- Jody Reed 7, Herm Winningham 6)

otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I loved Ellis Burks. I really started following the Red Sox in 1990 (right after he stopped running!) (stupid knees & back), and the most indelible memories I have of that year are A) Greenwell's crap ankle, B) Clemens coming back from injury - hamstring? probably - to shut down the Blue Jays for 6 innings late in the season, and C) Tom Brunansky's season-ending catch of a lame duck Texas leaguer Ozzie Guillen slashed down the right field line.

Oh, yeah - and D) Clemens getting tossed out of the ALCS by Gerry (sic?) Cooney.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i remember the bruno catch vividly because channel 38 was using the press box camera angle and that part of right field isn't visible with that angle. i saw him sprinting over and didn't know if he caught it or if it hit the turf, and if it hit the turf if it was a double or what. the players rushing the field was a tip off that he caught it.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

What gods deem it funny, that big fish like Thome and Sheff avoid surgery when our own Jeff Hammonds is out 6+ weeks??

Leee the Lee (Leee), Thursday, 11 March 2004 04:13 (twenty-two years ago)

yikes, jensen's throwing his knuckler again:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=knight-sorebackkeepsbondsonsidel&prov=knight&type=lgns

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 12 March 2004 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

hey gygax, i know this isn't exactly the right forum but i'd be remiss if i didn't let you know that my new favorite band is playing in your neck of the woods at thee parkside tonight.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 12 March 2004 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Slim Cessna's Auto Club, Ponys, Girls, Lashes Parkside. 10pm.

hmm... what's the scoop? good news: i don't have plans til after 10pm but bad news I have about 6 friends in town this weekend and not all of them wanna rock tonight. we'll see.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 12 March 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, band name would've helped. the ponys. so so good.

otto midnight (otto midnight), Friday, 12 March 2004 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Nen throws 92mph @ "80-85% effort".

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

To extrapolate from those figures, his top speed is 115 mph. Looks like that surgery sure helped!

O.Leee.B. (Leee), Wednesday, 17 March 2004 20:03 (twenty-two years ago)

TRADED: Leo Estrella (RP) and Wayne Franklin (SP) for 2 minor leaguers (plus talk of Jerome Williams being sent down to Fresno):

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-brewers-giantstrade&prov=ap&type=lgns

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Blurb:

"Four ex-Giants will be Opening Day starters for other teams: Russ Ortiz (Atlanta), Livan Hernández (Montreal), Shawn Estes (Colorado) and Sidney Ponson (Baltimore)."

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 01:18 (twenty-two years ago)

more:

"Alfonzo left with a migraine after batting in the sixth, and shortstop Neifi Perez came out after hurting his left pinkie. He was fixing a bat and hurt the fingernail so badly it turned black and he couldn't get his glove on."

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 01:24 (twenty-two years ago)

A flurry of minor league signings this morning:

Dave Veres
Mike Crudale
Deivi Cruz

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

dave veres AND deivi cruz? ouch. deivi cruz is a truly frustrating cat to watch in the box. free swinging, no eye and minor pop. it boggles the mind.

j.q. higgins, Wednesday, 31 March 2004 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

hey, sabean's paying neifi perez $2.1M a year... this is not out of the ordinary.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe he has some sort of positional consistency formula that's based on vowels and syllabic uniformity?

j.q. higgins, Wednesday, 31 March 2004 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Including Estes & (possibly) Ponson in that list says more about the paucity of #1 rotational options for the teams in question than what the Giants are lacking.

Sending down Jerome Williams would be Grade A stupid (AKA par for the course for the org that wants to pay both Neifi & Deivi) - if you're going to lose games, lose them w/ a kid that's on his way up (& has had proven success against ML hitters) instead of some nomadic portside deckswabber that can't grab a spot on the rotation of the worst team in baseball.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Your words hurt me because they sound like truth! :_(

Vitamin Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Giants just signed some pitcher named Kevin who was in the Padres' camp this spring.

Vitamin Leee (Leee), Wednesday, 31 March 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Make that Kevin Walker. Foppert DL'ed, Jensen optioned to Fresno.

Vitamin Leee (Leee), Thursday, 1 April 2004 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Michael Tucker-- playing his first game at SBC Park in a SF Giants uniform last night in an exhibition game against the Texas Rangers-- was one single short of hitting for the cycle when he was taken out of the game (to a standing ovation) in the fifth inning: opposite field homer, triple, and ground rule double.

perhaps he will be the recipient of the prestigious 2001 rich aurilia, 2002 jeff kent "hey look at me! i bat in front of barry bonds" distinction? you make the call.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 2 April 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

this estrella/walker deal is really (and i mean truly) a tidal wave of shit that the giants did not need.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 6 April 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
Is Schmidt a headhunter? Except for the couple times each start he throws in some chin music, he's got awesome control. Hmm?

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't know, remember when he nailed edgar martinez in the head during the all-star game? that was freaky. maybe the ball just gets away from him at random times.

John (jdahlem), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

The All-Star thing probably should indicate that he does have intermittent control problems, since why would anyone who isn't psychotic (or Randy Johnson) want to pull something like that in a meaningless game on a national scale. But the way Schmidt paints corners and hits his spots, I can't totally dismiss the same talk that dogs Clemens. (Though maybe since Schmidt does do it with regularity, it isn't on purpose?)

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 04:20 (twenty-two years ago)

he does it to freak the other guy out... to give the impression like he has no idea what he's doing. old school baseball trick.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)

(cf. Rick Ankiel)

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

SF must have gotten the point, they have whipped off nine straight wins which puts them only 2.5 out of first!

Quite a turn around for a week and a half.

earlnash, Monday, 31 May 2004 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

All signs point to Schmidt.

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Monday, 31 May 2004 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

10 IN A ROW NON-BELIEVERS I WUV MY GIGANTICS

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Pedro Feliz has walked THREE times all year. There's no excuse for that. As someone wrote on BP the other day, any pitcher worth his salt should be able to get out a guy with such poor selectivity at the plate (and yet Feliz has 8 homers).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

He's a graduate of the Alfonso Soriano Road to Success correspondence school!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Ixnay on the ethray alksway! I'm trying to trade Pedro FeLiz "Fraser"!

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)

THREEEEEEEEEEEEE WALKS!

I WANT MY THREEEEEEEEEEE WALKS!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

How do you like your crow Mr. Dickey?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/05/20/SPGJS6OIUK1.DTL

metfigga (metfigga), Tuesday, 1 June 2004 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing about Feliz is that he can hit ANYBODY'S fastball.

Here's a short list of pitchers Feliz has tagged for round-trippers (bear in mind he's been a platoon player/pinch hitter until this year):

Billy Wagner
Eric Gagne
Greg Maddux
Roy Oswalt
Trevor Hoffman
Guillermo Mota
Tim Hudson (2x)
Kevin Milwood
Randy Wolf (2x)
Mark Buehrle

I don't think there's a lot of guys playing ball that have tagged dingers off guys like these, especially not coming off the bench.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 3 June 2004 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Yo, Feliz has almost doubled his walk total IN ONE GAME. LET'S SEE SOMEONE ELSE DO THAT.

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Friday, 4 June 2004 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)

And how about those errors?

Speaking of errors, it's nice to see the all-field, no-hit Jetes revert back to his all-hit, no-field ways (cf. the 3 HRs & 3 Es in his last 2 games).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 4 June 2004 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn you and your fair and balanced reporting, I can't move my agenda with all this talk of "defense."

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Friday, 4 June 2004 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

You need to work the "Melvin Mora" angle more, Leeeeeeeeeee.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 4 June 2004 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to see Feliz and Mora in the same infield playing hacky sack with the ball.

Lazer Guided Mellow Leee (Leee), Friday, 4 June 2004 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)

And the G-men are now 1 1/2 back of both LA and SD with Schmidt on the mound tomorrow in Tampa. Without having had time to watch much baseball this year, is there reason for hope that the Giants can win the West?

LA has routinely faded in the second half and SD is far from a proven winnner. Perhaps with some good luck the Giants can steal away the division??

metfigga (metfigga), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Like I telepathically beamed to gygax!*, the Giants are a darkhorse this year. The Dodgers have been playing .500 ball more or less since that big win streak in early May, as have the Padres.

My guess is that if/when the Giants win the division (since it looks like the NL Central is going to produce the wild card), the team's going to look back at the Pierzysnki brouhaha as a "chemistry turning point" where they got their beef out into the open and miraculously became a more relaxed team.

*whatever

vleeetrmx21 (Leee), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i can't get too excited about the recent success because they are playing really weak teams. when they start playing teams with winning records i'll be more open to optimism but getting swept by the dodgers AND pirates at home really sobered me up to this team's faults.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 04:45 (twenty-two years ago)

oh felix... i hope you and your one pitch make somebody else's team very happy someday.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 10 June 2004 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)

So this afternoon I saw:

--Bonds hit his 675th homer in his 32nd different ballpark (Camden Yards) off his 400th different pitcher (Rodrigo Lopez).
--Rafael Palmeiro catch and pass Mickey Mantle for 11th in all-time homers.
--The Orioles--in a tie game in the bottom of the ninth, with bases loaded, no outs, the AL's leading hitter at the plate (Melvin Mora, popup to RF) and the 2002 AL MVP on deck (Miguel Tejada, 1-2-3 DP)--fail to score.
--Bonds (3 for 6, 2 RBI), in the eleventh, reach out and poke an RBI single into left with the shift on.

Good game. Answer me a question, though. In the top of the 11th, Alou pinch hit Deivi Cruz for CF Marquis Grissom (hitting third). In the bottom of the 11th, he moved DH Dustan Mohr (batting second, hitting .190) into CF to replace Grissom. Doesn't that mean that the Giants lost their DH and that the pitcher would have had to bat in the third spot had the game continued? I'm unclear on these crazy DH rules.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 13 June 2004 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

it's impossible to "lose" the DH. anyone can be DH anytime.

now you answer me this: did bonds really "reach out and poke" the ball into left? because i don't _think_ i've ever seen him do something like that, although i may've once seen him slap a ball past a third baseman. obviously it would make so much sense, but generally hitters don't bother adjusting to the shift, bonds included. i guess he figured this was a special circumstance, but maybe it's something we'll see more of in the future? not that bonds could be any more dangerous...

ps don't day-night doubleheaders suck the ass?

John (jdahlem), Sunday, 13 June 2004 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Day-night doubleheaders do deeply suck.

I was pretty far out down the left field line, but it sure looked to me like he served it into left on purpose. Jorge Julio throws hard-ish, but I hardly think Bonds was overpowered. I think there were men on first and second; the third baseman was playing at roughly the SS position (I'm not sure why the Giant on second didn't just steal third, but whatever.) Maybe gygax! can catch a replay, but I really think he did it on purpose, and yes, that is scary.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Sunday, 13 June 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Bonds did go the other way on purpose.

Also, AARGH ARRGH HERGES.

vleeetrmx21 (Leee), Sunday, 13 June 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

John, it is possible to "lose" the DH:

6.10
Any League may elect to use the Designated Hitter Rule. (a) In the event of inter league competition between clubs of Leagues using the Designated Hitter Rule and clubs of Leagues not using the Designated Hitter Rule, the rule will be used as follows: 1. In World Series or exhibition games, the rule will be used or not used as is the practice of the home team. 2. In All Star games, the rule will only be used if both teams and both Leagues so agree. (b) The Rule provides as follows: A hitter may be designated to bat for the starting pitcher and all subsequent pitchers in any game without otherwise affecting the status of the pitcher(s) in the game. A Designated Hitter for the pitcher must be selected prior to the game and must be included in the lineup cards presented to the Umpire in Chief. The designated hitter named in the starting lineup must come to bat at least one time, unless the opposing club changes pitchers. It is not mandatory that a club designate a hitter for the pitcher, but failure to do so prior to the game precludes the use of a Designated Hitter for that game. Pinch hitters for a Designated Hitter may be used. Any substitute hitter for a Designated Hitter becomes the Designated Hitter. A replaced Designated Hitter shall not re enter the game in any capacity. The Designated Hitter may be used defensively, continuing to bat in the same position in the batting order, but the pitcher must then bat in the place of the substituted defensive player, unless more than one substitution is made, and the manager then must designate their spots in the batting order. A runner may be substituted for the Designated Hitter and the runner assumes the role of Designated Hitter. A Designated Hitter may not pinch run. A Designated Hitter is "locked" into the batting order. No multiple substitutions may be made that will alter the batting rotation of the Designated Hitter. Once the game pitcher is switched from the mound to a defensive position this move shall terminate the Designated Hitter role for the remainder of the game. Once a pinch hitter bats for any player in the batting order and then enters the game to pitch, this move shall terminate the Designated Hitter role for the remainder of the game. Once the game pitcher bats for the Designated Hitter this move shall terminate the Designated Hitter role for the remainder of the game. (The game pitcher may only pinch hit for the Designated Hitter). Once a Designated Hitter assumes a defensive position this move shall terminate the Designated Hitter role for the remainder of the game. A substitute for the Designated Hitter need not be announced until it is the Designated Hitter's turn to bat.

boldbury (boldbury), Monday, 14 June 2004 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)

huh, thanks, i had no idea. i don't think i've ever seen it happen, although it apparently would've in mookie's very scenario (which i didn't even really read cuz my AL spoiled ass was like "of COURSE you keep the DH, what are you nuts? surely you're not suggesting pitchers can fucking BAT?")


is there some obvious utilitarian reason for this rule that i'm overlooking, or is it just there for it's own sake?

John (jdahlem), Monday, 14 June 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)

oh specifically i'm referring to the "once a DH is used defensively" one.

John (jdahlem), Monday, 14 June 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

It happens once every 3 or 4 years. And when it does, they usually point it out on Sportscenter since it's kind of an oddity. Then there was also the game in the late 80s when the Yankees used pitcher Rick Rhoden as a DH to start the game.

I'm not sure if this is a utilitarian reason, but it my best guess is that it goes back to the part of the rule that says the DH is "locked" in the batting order, meaning that it can't be moved around in the lineup the way another defensive position can in certain situations, such as a double switch.

Maybe it's more of a metaphyisal thing. Like the DH isn't a solid concrete position, but more of an ephemeral concept.

boldbury (boldbury), Monday, 14 June 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Right-hander Jesse Foppert, 8-9 as a rookie last year, continues to progress from elbow surgery with the intention of returning in September.

Two weeks ago, Foppert increased his throws from 80 to 85 mph in batting practice and simulated games.

If his 12-month rehabilitation schedule continues on track, Foppert -- who has had no setbacks -- would be ready for a minor league rehabilitation assignment in August.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 14 June 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

can i get a wha-wha for first place?

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

wha-wha-WHAT????

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

how about a "fon-fonz"?

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw! 6 RBIs last night! Took him long enough.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

"whoof whoof whoo-whoo-whoof!" sorry, i'm just having flashbacks of the game where the giants had the bahamen perform.

so can it last? i think it's the type of year where anything can happen.

metfigga (metfigga), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

the NL west is teh suck. the key is who the padres and dodger bring in midseason because the giants have made it clear that this is their 2004 team as is. the beltran to LA rumor is dying down so that's refreshing.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

To put a finer point on what gygax sez: Sabean's said he's not going to break the bank/mortgage the future to rent a player, but he's still got feelers out for this year's Sir Fatney Eric Young Kenny Lofton.

Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeff Conine to the Bay!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 24 June 2004 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)

About 5 weeks ago they were 8 games under .500 and they are now top of the NL West, 2.5 games ahead of LA in the NL West and only the 3rd team in MLB to win 41 games.

So what does Eric Gagne have to say about his latest PacBell meltdown?
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20040625/capt.fxpb10906250243.dodgers_giants_fxpb109.jpg

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 25 June 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

ESPN's highlights sure made Michael Tucker out to be quite the drama queen, which bolsters the impression I got from watching him hit a HR off Zambrano in Chicago.

The pitch Gagne knocked him down with reminded me of the high strike Clemens threw to Manny last year.

mattbot (mattbot), Friday, 25 June 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Darn that "high strike".

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 25 June 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

this may be the slowest team in the modern era... any challenges to that?

-- gygax! (gygax0...), March 6th, 2004 5:18 PM. (gygax!) (admin) (66.122.50.136)

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/stats/byteam?cat=Overall&cut_type=0&conference=MLB&year=season_2004&sort=711

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

three weeks pass...
Matt Herges, 2004 Giants Closer, 22 Saves:

Batting Average Allowed: .348
On Base % Allowed: .394
Slugging % Allowed: .530
OPS Allowed: .924

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 02:03 (twenty-one years ago)

visitors box score as of 8:05pm tonight:

 San Diego   
K. Greene SS 1-2
M. Loretta 2B 1-2
B. Giles RF 1-2
P. Nevin 1B 1-2
R. Klesko LF 1-2
R. Aurilia 3B 1-2
J. Payton CF 1-2
M. Ojeda C 1-2
J. Peavy P 0-1

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 02:05 (twenty-one years ago)

that's top of the 4th no outs, padres leading 4-1.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

even worse than the score tonight was the national anthem. holy crap. did anyone else happen to hear it?

metfigga (metfigga), Thursday, 22 July 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Not Carl Lewis AGAIN?!?!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 22 July 2004 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)

no metfigga, please elaborate.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Rich Aurilia, how YOU doin'?

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 July 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I've sent an email to KNBR inquiring about just what the hell was going on with the national anthem last night. If they reply I'll post their response.

In the meantime I found a thread on the Giants message board via mlb.com. Only three postings (and I've got a 24-hour moratorium on posting as a new member) but I think that's probably three more postings than normal about the national anthem...

here's the link
national anthem

metfigga (metfigga), Thursday, 22 July 2004 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

update:

my email to KNBR (gary radnich show) was just read on the air. i really tore into the woman who sang the anthem, referring to it sounding like a wounded hyena (this was read on the air). and i was afraid of this, turns out, the woman was blind and perhaps otherwise disabled.

of course i didn't hear her being introduced, so i had no idea that this was an opportunity being given to someone with a handicap.

so there you go. she was blind and i'm sorry i even asked.

metfigga (metfigga), Thursday, 22 July 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

oh man, that sucks.

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 22 July 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

What's the buzz on Noah Lowry?

Pitchers             IP  H   R   ER  BB  SO  HR  ERA
Noah Lowry (W,1-0) 9 3 0 0 2 9 0 2.43

I see he turned in a quality start against LA on 6/29 but then got sent down?

mattbot (mattbot), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

first round draft pick from pepperdine (malibu, ca), lefty with a nasty changeup that he throws right over the top so it looks meaty until the batter swings (so says Jason LaRue, Reds Catcher). he's looked okay in AAA (Fresno Grizzlies) but he's turned in a few great MLB spot-starts filling in for injuries... if you throw out his first outing he's had a 1.34 ERA over almost 27 innings spread across 5 appearances..

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I picked him up for my fantasy league!

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm guessing gygax! isn't completely sold on him because I just added him in our league. Either that or he's not as desperate for starting pitching as I am.

Jimmy Carter, History's Greatest Monster (Leee), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Leee,

I hope I'm wrong, but I mean take a look at his AAA statistics:

http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/minorleagues/team_stats.jsp?c_id=sf&minor_id=PCLFRE

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

You could look at stats, or you can judge by his INTANGIBLES. I've seen him with my two own eyes! UPSIDE!

Jimmy Carter, History's Greatest Monster (Leee), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree, just ask the Las Vegas 51's about Lowry's intangibles.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, thank you brian sabean:

oh felix... i hope you and your one pitch make somebody else's team very happy someday.

-- gygax! (gygax0...), June 9th, 2004 6:51 PM. (gygax!)

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

slowest team ever AND worst relievers in the history of major league baseball.

and even yet, will take the wildcard.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 5 August 2004 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

That 3-1 called strike on Alfonzo was awful.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Thursday, 5 August 2004 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

slowest team ever AND worst relievers in the history of major league baseball.

-- gygax! (gygax0...), August 4th, 2004 11:24 PM. (gygax!)

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 5 August 2004 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

The Giants are toast, and so's my interest in baseball.

Typical Fairweather Bay Area Sports "Fan" (Leee), Thursday, 5 August 2004 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

N. Lowry (W, 2-0) 7.1 ip - 8 h - 3 r - 2 er - 1 bb - 6 so

See?

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Monday, 9 August 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

oh i know!!! he looks great, but it makes you wonder what those guys batting .290 off him in AAA were doing differently than the pros.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 9 August 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the Giants AAA team in the hitter-friendly PCL?

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 9 August 2004 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, however the hitter friendly PCL is nothing compared to the hitter friendly NL West however (Bank One Ballbark, Coors Field, etc.).

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 9 August 2004 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

The NL West is nothing compared to Noah Lowry.

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Monday, 9 August 2004 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Seeing all three games in this past weekend's Cubs/Giants series, I must say that the whole Bond's shift thing is waste. It hurt the Cubs much more than it helped, as twice if Ramierez was playing 3b he could have gotten foul pop ups by Bonds which led to walks that extended innings and allowed runs to score, also yesterday Feliz was able to take third without a throw as there was no one covering the bag, which led to another run.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Monday, 9 August 2004 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Defend The Indefensible : The Shift

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 9 August 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Are we missing Benito?? Game-calling & whatnot. But also: what happened to the defense???

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Lee, the answer to tonight's game can be traced to 2 back to back inning-ending double plays with a combined 5 runners on base.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:23 (twenty-one years ago)

PH3AR TEH PIRATES!

mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the giants have not one a single game against the bux this year.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 12 August 2004 01:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I swear that runners LOB have always been part of the post-2000 or post-Kent Giants. I'll grant you this year's horrendous number of GIDPs, though. It's the pitching -- the offense gets a lead and unless it's Schmidt (and perhaps now Lowry), the other team's guaranteed to mount a serious comeback.

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Thursday, 12 August 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

NEIFI PRESENTED WALKING PAPERS! OCTOBER HERE WE COME!!

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Friday, 13 August 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

How does a veteran team suck so much at baserunning? Is it the ghost of Ruben Rivera?

Mr. Tony Plow (Leee), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

haha that was AWFUL. if bill cowher were managing the giants, dustan mohr would be dead now

mookieproof (mookieproof), Wednesday, 18 August 2004 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean, what was he thinking? even if it had been fair, the fucking infield-fly rule for fuck's sake! what a bonehead. yes, he attempted forgiveness by smaking a 450 footer into right, the likes i haven't seen since the big cat doinked one over onto the promenade over that way.

jesse foppert (tommy john) pitched 5 innings for fresno, striking out four and giving up 2 runs... sources say he will see mlb action by september.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 19 August 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Dear Old Man McKeon...

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 26 August 2004 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Bret Tomko came through with a vet's performance tonight against the Marlins throwing a complete game shutout. Considering the state of the SF bullpen, which has been better of late, getting a night off in a playoff run before a weekend series against a division leader like the Braves is a boost.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Friday, 27 August 2004 02:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Schmitty update! Trainer Stan Conte calls Schmidt's groin the "best he's ever seen."

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 27 August 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

It's over. IT'S OVER! I'm pulling for the A's now!

chicken little (Leee), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

haha. oh man. michael tucker bitching out the ump for getting picked off while pretty much asleep out there with one out, representing the tying run, in a pennant/playoff race... i mean, what a little bitch. watch him after every strikeout, this guy is a bum.*

*if he starts batting .300 i have the right to waive the above sentiment.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 3 September 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

bonds 698

maura (maura), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

later he hit a linedrive laserbeam that was still climbing when it hit the wall, about 3 feet from the top of the wall in the middle of the power alley. it hit the wall so hard that it bounced back in to the right fielder's zone and he was held to a single.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
Some BP writer asked the other day who the alien inhabiting JT Snow's body is:

post-All-Star-- .413/.516/.680 !!!!

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

because the giants have been facing so many lefties, JT's only been playing 3 maybe 4 times a week. i was wondering last night when the giants knocked the houston southpaw starter out in the top of the 3rd and was replaced with a righty, if they'd pinch hit snow for pedro feliz... feliz did what snow did last sunday: bases loaded double off the wall (missing a grand slam by a few feet).

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Does the Giants' OBP (second only to Bosox, only NL team above .350) explain enough of their success? (Issue raised by this site.)

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 23 September 2004 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i think i pointed out on some thread that the giants' team BA is only mid-pack, but their OBP being #2 is an indicator that having a guy on base 3-4 times a game for free basically gives you a distinct advantage, the likes of which has never been seen before in MLB.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 23 September 2004 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

They're second in OBP, sixth in slugging, and first in runs scored. So yeah, if you look at any stat other than OBP, they're in the middle of the NL pack. And yet they lead in RS. Amazing.

Rob Neyer wrote, in spring training 2003 IIRC, that Bonds was the only player in baseball who could singlehandedly make a good team into a great team. Here is our proof.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 23 September 2004 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)

(tonight, Bonds was 1-1 with an RBI and four walks -- who else puts up those sorts of lines regularly? Giants win 5-1)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 23 September 2004 06:42 (twenty-one years ago)

the giants are first in the NL in BA w/ RISP. but that's not nearly as huge a factor as one might think (a la 2003 royals), because they're only ahead of second place houston by one point, only 12-14 points ahead of the middle of the pack, and only 2 points ahead of their overall batting average. by BA+SLG, they'd no longer be in first w/ RISP, but by OPS they'd be ahead by 25 points, due to B. Bonds OBP with runners on. (overall team .400 OBP w/ RISP)

John (jdahlem), Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

(tonight, Bonds was 1-1 with an RBI and four walks

a triple and four INTENTIONAL walks.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 23 September 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Phil Garner: Wildcard Ringer

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 23 September 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

a triple and four INTENTIONAL walks.
Larry Dierker's spirit lives on in the Houston dugout.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 23 September 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

While making ammends with the 2002 series, I came up with a theory based on the law of averages that if you significantly outscore your opponent, it's only a matter of time before they answer back with .

In the recent SF/HOU series, the Giants had won 9-2, 5-1, and as of the 8th inning last night with 3 outs to go, were up 3-2 on the Astros. With the HOU "killer-B" lineup of Biggio, Beltran, Bagwell and Berkman due up in the top of the 9th and having been outscored 17-4 in the past 26 innings by the Giants, I had an uneasy feeling. The Astros lineup seemed better than 17-4 and with staff ace Jason Schmidt being relieved by journeyman starter cum closer Dustin Hermanson, a Houston comeback seemed almost inevitable.

In the 2002 World Series with the Anaheim Angels vs. the SF Giants, the games were decided as such:

game 1: SF 4 - ANA 3
game 2: SF 10 - ANA 11
game 3: SF 4 - ANA 10
game 4: SF 4 - ANA 3 (SF rallies back from 3-0 with 4 unanswered runs)
game 5: SF 16 - ANA 4
game 6: SF 5 - ANA 6 (ANA rallies back from 5-0 with 6 unanswered runs)
game 7: SF 1 - ANA 4

So for the total series, SF outscored ANA 44 - 41 which shows a pretty competitive 7 game series. But in the distribution of runs, SF went on a stretch of outscoring ANA 25-4. When ANA finally answered back by outscoring SF 10-1, the series was over.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 24 September 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going to the corner to have a nice cry.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Friday, 24 September 2004 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Livan Hernandez (0-2)
Felix Rodriguez (0-2)

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 24 September 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

how much would russ ortiz's game six game ball be worth on the open market?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 24 September 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

gygax i don't understand. i mean that's true for evenly matched teams of course, but over enough games if you significantly outscore your opponent, it means you're significantly better than them! of course in just about any playoff series and esp. in a world series, teams are very likely to be just about evenly matched and maybe that's what you were talking about. or maybe by significant you meant as severely lopsided as those examples in which case i'd also agree. ok so sorry to quibble but i've already got that typed out so i'm just gonna post it anyway.

John (jdahlem), Friday, 24 September 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

(god bless the 1960 pirates, who were slaughtered runs-wise 55-27.)

(there's no pirate thread; is it okay if i take a moment here to weep that it's now been 25 years since the pirates' (and steelers'!) last championship?)

mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 24 September 2004 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

barring appeal, dustin hermanson is suspended three games and fined an undisclosed amount for beaning jeff kent.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

meanwhile the rookie that threw at Bonds knee and then behind him in one at bat has no penalties issued.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

So if Hermanson appeals, what are the odds he won't have to serve the suspension until next year? I can't imagine they'd turn an appeal around so quickly in the last week of a playoff race.

I'm trying to think of comparable suspensions from the Cubs' season (there have been plenty):

Zambrano got 5 games/1 start for hitting Edmonds in the ass. Roy Oswalt didn't get suspended for beaning Michael Barrett (that I know of). Matt Morris didn't get suspended for throwing two pitches at Derrek Lee. Kerry Wood got 5 games/1 start for arguing with a home plate ump, LaTroy Hawkins got 3 games for arguing with an ump.

I'm not seeing a pattern. 3 games for a reliever is harsh.

mattbot (mattbot), Tuesday, 28 September 2004 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG I CANNAE TAKE NOT SEEING MY GAMEZ0RZ

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 30 September 2004 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG I'M GLAD I'M NOT WATCHING THIS NOW.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 30 September 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Dustan Mohr makes (yet another) blunder that costs the Giants the game... Bases loaded, one out... pop fly hooking into foul territory, he goes for it instead of letting it go. Runner tags and scores on the putout. Had he let the ball drop foul, there's no play.

Apparently he's hurt too. This team is way too sloppy at this point in the season to be taken seriously.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 September 2004 04:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I watched it at the bar we went to that one time, Leee!

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 30 September 2004 05:19 (twenty-one years ago)

FWIW: The Giants rotation for the back half of the year has been:

Jason Schmidt
Brett Tomko
Kirk Rueter
Noah Lowry (rookie call-up)
Brian Hennessy (rookie call-up)

The Giants have second year starting pitchers Jerome Williams back (who pitched 7 innings of 1 run ball last night) and Jesse Foppert available after lengthy stays on the DL for this last weekend of baseball.

gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 1 October 2004 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
Giants sign Omar Vizquel (he wanted to be West Coast, closer to his family in Seattle). He'll probably flip flop lead off with Durham (both switch hitters). In 2003, he had 2 knee surgeries but it didn't seem to affect him to much last season, batting .291/.353/.388. His VORP was 35.5 (9th in MLB SS, 5th in AL SS), EqA .272 (8th in MLB SS, 5th in AL SS), tied for 7th in MLB SS RARP (33.1), and his fielding stats are still good.

He's signed $12+M over 3 years making him a bit of a risk, which the "thirtysomething" Giants don't really need right now with the heavy burden of an aging veteran lineup. Looking at his stats he goes cold during the last 2 months of the last few seasons, which could show signs of age/wear & tear. Having Deivi Cruz as a back up middle infielder for Vizquel and injury-prone Ray Durham (not to mention Cruz's very impressive end to the 2004 season) shows some depth the Giants have lacked in recent years.

Overall, it's better than the Neif-arious position they were in at the beginning of last season.

gygax! (gygax!), Sunday, 14 November 2004 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

You've allayed my fears some, gygax!.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't like the $$$$, that seems awfully high for a well past his prime, not every day shortstop. this move does not sit well with me at all. had it been a $4 mil flyer on a one year deal, okay. but three years for visquel at this point is highly questionable.

metfigga (metfigga), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Visquel's been durable -- he was injured a couple of years ago for half the season but otherwise has been playing 140+ games basically every year -- but the guy's gonna be 40 when this deal expires (how many everyday SS played until they were 40?) and his offense is in the midst of a steep decline, as you'd expect for 37-year old SS who was never a great hitter to begin with. I think the Giants were fooled by the .291 BA, after all, their manager is Felipe "I don't give a crap about OBP, the 'Spos were last or second last in OBP most of the years I managed them, but did I let it bother me? Nope" Alou, who you'd THINK would finally get the message about the value of a guy who can take a walk considering he's got BONDS on his team.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

The talk I had read that Vizquel might be going to the Red Sox, so it is suprising that he ends up in SF. Dave Concepcion and Ozzie Smith both played till they were 40 or so, but neither was the same player their last couple of seasons and Concepcion played quite a bit of 1b his last couple of years with the Reds.

One good thing for Giants fans are players of this era of baseball playing better at a later age than ever before, after all the best hitter and perhaps two best starting pitchers in the NL are at 40 or older.

Earl Nash (earlnash), Monday, 15 November 2004 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not seeing the decline, MiR. I'm looking at his 2004 VORP/RARP/EqA and they're very respectable (in the top 1/3rd-1/4th of MLB SS).

His last 2 full seasons (2002 & 2004) are better than his career averages. 2001 was his weakest recent year offensively and weighs down his recent performance, then again that was 3 seasons ago.

The $4M/yr. is $2M less than he was making in Cleveland. Not to mention he's cheaper than Garciaparra or Renteria who Vizquel outperformed in 2004. I would imagine the Giants structure the contract heavier towards the end of the deal and hope he retires before the final year.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 15 November 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I was comparing 1996-2000 with 2001-2004. In the latter four years, he had two good seasons and two bad seasons. And the good seasons weren't as good as the good ones from 1996-2000. So which Omar Vizquel will show up for the Giants this year? Considering that, coupled with his age, a three year deal is a huge risk.

Renteria has been steadily improving and is now hitting his peak years.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Monday, 15 November 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

VORP, RARP, EQA are all pretty much gonna say the same thing for our purposes here. he had a good year last year and that's that. he can still field decently but a 3 year contract at that cost is moronic. a loftonlike 2/6, maybe as high as 2/8, would've made more sense. and i can't believe a third year would've been something they HAD to do - even if vizquel goes elsewhere, surely there's a cheaper alternative?

John (jdahlem), Monday, 15 November 2004 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Gleeman weighs in on the Vizquel/Giants trade

C    A.J. Pierzynski      28
1B J.T. Snow 37
2B Ray Durham 33
SS Omar Vizquel 38
3B Edgardo Alfonzo 31
LF Barry Bonds 40
CF Marquis Grissom 38
RF Michael Tucker 34

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow. The Giants are fucking old. Don't they have any good minor league non-pitching guys?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Reading that article makes it clear that, no, no they don't.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 16 November 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

doesn't this article beg the question, wtf? in regards to the vizquel contract??? the giants need a closer, a reliable starter and someone with some pop to help bonds.

i can't understand why the giants were so hot for vizquel that they would cave in to his demand for a three year deal. it doesn't add up.

metfigga (metfigga), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Blogger Mike on Sabean losing his mind, and the history of 37-y.o. shortstops:

http://www.all-baseball.com/mikesbballrants/archives/016380.html

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.