Mods, PLEASE can you delete this thread now that I have learnt my lesson the hard way

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

This one

Someone has turned the central part of it into a YTMND article about me which features in the top 10 of me when Googled. My mother just googled me and found it. Now has announced she's not talking to me again.

Holy fuck, if i find out who did it...

...but I've emailed them and asked for it to be deleted so we should be OK.

Could the parent thread also go? I've had to learn the hard way (and it hasn't taken nearly so long as some thought it would), but FUCKING HELL, I know I made a mistake, but someone (whose YTMND username is 'ILXor') has been an absolute cunt about it.

Also, Curtis, wherever you are, posting that picture of me on ILX was a fucking stupid idea. It was used in that YTMND thing to validate the claim in the post. Now everyone has access to it. The sooner the thread can be deleted, the better.

And if you ARE that ILXor who YTMND'd me, I'm asking you now, very 'funny' as it was, to delete whatever you did before I get the YTMND legal team properly involved.

Thanks,

LJ.

P.S. Don't use my name in this thread either, cheers. I know someone really 'lol internet haha' will, but you're a fucking cunt to do so.

― unfished business, Monday, 26 March 2007 00:36 (nineteen years ago)

ok, change of plan. seeing as this clearly isn't going to happen, i am quitting ilx for good. tara.

― unfished business, Monday, 26 March 2007 00:58 (nineteen years ago)

lol internet

― am0n, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:00 (nineteen years ago)

.....

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:03 (nineteen years ago)

I'm really sorry dude.

― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

if I were a mod I would've cleaned that pic from my post the second after I posted it. I felt horrible abt it but I can't believe someone YTMND'd it.

― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

l0uis j4gger is gone off the net because of you.

― g®▲Ðұ, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:14 (nineteen years ago)

I'm going to toss off a crying eagle in tribute.

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:17 (nineteen years ago)

lj, are you ever concerned that a young woman you meet might google your name and see all the ilx hijinks you have been a part of?

tony conrad schnitzler (sanskrit) on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:57 (2 months ago)

If she does that sort of thing then she fucking deserves to witness my trail of destruction!

the killfire konspiracy (Haberdager) on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:01 (2 months ago)

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

wise dude

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

http://louisjagger.ytmnd.com/

― gershy, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:28 (nineteen years ago)

really, really shitty.

― modestmickey, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:38 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.dj-art.com/V1/Parents/Parents-Shocked-Mom.jpg

― chaki, Monday, 26 March 2007 01:58 (nineteen years ago)

What, no "Price is Right" theme music?

― Pleasant Plains, Monday, 26 March 2007 02:54 (nineteen years ago)

Surely more "Tarzan Boy", no?

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

poppers.wav

― g®▲Ðұ, Monday, 26 March 2007 03:00 (nineteen years ago)

a lesson we all must learn for ourselves, like "have a back up"

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:25 (nineteen years ago)

Currently viewing ILXor's sites:

Last Online: March 12
Member Since: 2007-03-12 12:13:40

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

plenty of time to circulate

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:43 (nineteen years ago)

Danny Lui - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He is best known for his catchphrase "Ban Louis Jagger". Lui was co-founder of the Legend Group (now known as Lenovo) in Hong Kong. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Lui - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:44 (nineteen years ago)

i don't care if he keeps doing it, i'm just waiting breathlessly for the inevitable moderator thread where he's bitching that a relationship prospect/employer/mom has googled his name and is freaking out, begging to have everything deleted, is the thing! fair warnings and all that.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha) on Monday, 12 March 2007 17:27 (1 week ago)

i cast a vote of confidence for louis jagger

modestmickey on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 03:30 (1 week ago)

― forksclovetofu, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:47 (nineteen years ago)

wow wow

― chaki, Monday, 26 March 2007 04:54 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, what a shitty trick.

I'm not into deleting the thread, as there's a bunch of other ppls contributions, unrelated entirely to you, Louis. I'll see if we can get it deindexed.

― Pashmina, Monday, 26 March 2007 08:55 (nineteen years ago)

As a thought: should ILX ban the person who made the YTMND? I understand that it's not at fault but it does seem to go beyond the limits of what is acceptable behaviour regarding other users? Sure LJ was a bit indiscrete and god knows he abused that submit button but did he do anything to justify another user setting up an easily googlable webpage outside of ILX? I don't know, I just think that he was treated fairly shabbily and while he did invite a lot of abuse intentionally (attention seeking etc) he doesn't seem to have been a bad guy. I would like to feel that the majority of people on this messageboard are okay in general and would feel much the same way at what's just happened. Could we not at least do something about the user who did this lest they try it again with someone else? [/homily]

― kv_nol, Monday, 26 March 2007 10:18 (nineteen years ago)

It being ILX as a whole. Sorry a bit unclear the whole para!

― kv_nol, Monday, 26 March 2007 10:19 (nineteen years ago)

That's a fair question. I don't think we can really ban someone for something that's taken place offboard, even if it did involve a copy of an ILX post. I'm not sure we'll know for sure who the offending poster was either.

― Matt DC, Monday, 26 March 2007 10:23 (nineteen years ago)

Also to the person who actually made that page, you are a creepy fucking weirdo.

― Matt DC, Monday, 26 March 2007 10:24 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not aware that there's any way of finding out who put the ytmnd page up, unfortunately.

― Pashmina, Monday, 26 March 2007 10:36 (nineteen years ago)

Ask them very nicely if they keep an IP log? (or threaten with legal action unless they give you the IP address of the person who posted it over there so you can find them here?)

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

amazing

― g-kit, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:31 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think we can really ban someone for something that's taken place offboard, even if it did involve a copy of an ILX post.

See, I think that because it was an ILX post and that it was such an extreme thing to have done that even though I wouldn't give away that much about me on ILX I would be uncomfortable that my minor contributions could be made such a traceable thing. There are many people on ILX known to others who have put a lot on the board and if this person did it once what's to prevent them or people like them from doing it to others? I'm just very uncomfortable with what was done, I can't help but feel that I'd love to have a precedent to warn off people in the future from doing such a thing. Act like a hateful tool = get banned. Spam = get banned. Try to fuck over someone using ILX contributions = get banned.

― kv_nol, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

if this person did it once what's to prevent them or people like them from doing it to others?

The behaviour of those others, I'd assume.

Post something (about a cat and your testicles, for instance) + be a nice guy who doesn't get into fights = no problem, nobody will abuse your openness.

Post something like LJ did + don't make peace with your enemies = you're on your own.

It's hard and it's unfair, but that's life.

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:52 (nineteen years ago)

Considering who put together the Aja/D and "BAN DARRAMOUS" ytmnds, my guess is that this was done by Bato. He was a character, that one.

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

i do not condone this malicious treatment of louis and i hope he doesn't leave ilx because of it.

― estela, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:56 (nineteen years ago)

Considering who put together the Aja/D and "BAN DARRAMOUS" ytmnds, my guess is that this was done by Bato. He was a character, that one.

That would have been my first guess as well, fwiw.

― Pashmina, Monday, 26 March 2007 12:59 (nineteen years ago)

Who the hell is Bato and wtf is YTMND? (I know what it is, I just googled it, but WHY?)

― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 26 March 2007 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

Considering who put together the Aja/D and "BAN DARRAMOUS" ytmnds, my guess is that this was done by Bato. He was a character, that one.

Classic diversionary tactics.

― onimo, Monday, 26 March 2007 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

OH NO!!! I just googled another ILXor's name and I found this !

:-/

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

i do not condone this malicious treatment of louis and i hope he doesn't leave ilx because of it.

If he could post a little bit less and cut down the oh so arch OTT-ness! StanM I got the feeling that he was making peace with his enemies. I just think that he's probably been doomed from the get go thanks to the usual culprits (Dom Passantino with his little man-crush for example).

― kv_nol, Monday, 26 March 2007 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

In that case it was even more cruel that it happened. :-/

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 13:59 (nineteen years ago)

Bato = one of the duller trolls. You haven't really noticed him probably because Pash has been blanket banning his alternate usernames for some time now.

― Matt DC, Monday, 26 March 2007 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

Bato = Esteban roight?

― Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)

That's Pato. I don't *think* they're the same person.

― Matt DC, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

Esteban and Bato are 2 different individuals.

― Pashmina, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:24 (nineteen years ago)

people are mean to louis; but, really, who could have seen this one coming, eh?

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

Bato was a student at some Scottish Uni. He vandalised wikipedia under the name TuomasTumour.

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:27 (nineteen years ago)

gosh.

this is, you know, creepy and cunty and indefensible and all the rest, but i'd feel a bit more sympathy for louis if he hadn't been repeatedly warned about exactly this sort of thing happening for months now.

― lex pretend, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.texemarrs.com/images/scorpion_and_frog_cover.jpg

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

http://scruss.com/wordpress/wp-content/dontwhiz.jpg

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

bummer

― gbx, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

im a little bummed out that this means no more TMI posts from LJ

― homosexual II, Monday, 26 March 2007 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

Don't use my name in this thread either

That didn't work too well, did it? :-(

L0u1s: 8 times on this thread
J4gg3r: 3 times

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

http://ilx.wh3rd.net/thread.php?msgid=7198274

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

lol

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:34 (nineteen years ago)

lex very OTM.

― caek, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:39 (nineteen years ago)

people are mean to louis; but, really, who could have seen this one coming, eh?

That one guy that quit on Monday, 26 March 2007 15:27 (2 hours ago)

Maybe one of those two other guys?

― Pleasant Plains, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:57 (nineteen years ago)

see this is kind of another example of a thing that it would've been best to email someone about instead of starting a thread (that's already sprouted its own noize thread), telling us the story in great detail, begging us not to use your now-iconic name, causing the thread you want deleted to be revived, and generally continuing to put uncomfortable aspects of you life all over the public internets?

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

all i'm saying is, you're making me feel even less guilty about wanting to repost the truth or dare story to the "what is chewbacca saying" thread.

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:02 (nineteen years ago)

(j/k i'm actually really bored with the whole thing now)

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

(and really bored in general which is why i'm still here :D)

― ghost rider, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

ghost rider OTM x4

― g®▲Ðұ, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

whoever did this doesn't have even the balls to own up to it. playground lolz.

― g-kit, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

I think it would be hilarious if ilx threatened another website with legal action over a consensual and voluntary post made by an individual on a public forum. Maybe we could also sue McDonald's for selling wet coffee.

― Pleasant Plains, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

A consensual and voluntary post made by an individual on a public forum is still the property of that individual. I'd say copyright issues/libel could be mentioned - attaching his real name and picture to that text was WAY over the top and I wouldn't be surprised if people have been sued for less than that.

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

... which doesn't change the fact that it was extremely stupid. But if you forget to lock your door and someone steals all your stuff, you'd still call the cops, wouldn't you?

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:41 (nineteen years ago)

(sorry, tenses all wrong there - forgot/stole)

― StanM, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

what truth or dare stpry

― Mr. Que, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

i don't think libel is an issue if someone repeats you verbatim. copyright, yes. send them a dmca takedown notice!

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

i doubt that "ilx" the legal entity will be threatening anyone... all the money is spent right?

― lfam, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

DONATE ME MONEY, I AM EXCELLENT ATTORNEY

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:42 (nineteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/58/Phoenix_wright_boxart.jpg

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

"WHAT'S the BIG PROBLEM INGRATE? you LOST? this was an AWESOME v. 1.0 case."

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

I know that I'm a mean heartless bastard, etc, but seriously this is one of the funniest ILX-related incidents ever.

― HI DERE, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

(Also LJ really is Calum #2 now!)

― HI DERE, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

What happened to Calum? He was before my time.

― g®▲Ðұ, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Calum was a UK poster (I believe Scottish?) who went on a board-baiting tirade of "funny" rants involving horror movies, vivisection and Manic Street Preachers. After several run-ins with practically everyone, some of the stupid shit he said was found by one of his employers, who either fired him or heavily censured him, I can't remember which. After that, he stopped posting.

― HI DERE, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

I had no idea that's what had actually happened! Awesome.

― Matt DC, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

Feel sorry for Louis here, just serves as a reminder that, despite appearances, teh internets = IRL

― tom, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

(I forgot the misogyny, but yeah Matt, that's what happened!)

― HI DERE, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

forgot to mention calum was a contributor to fangoria

― latebloomer, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

Hahahaha that Calum thing is awesome! I never knew that either.

― Alex in SF, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

The other factor in Calum's disappearance was his claim that his girlfriend was pregnant. This was looked at askance.

― Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:05 (nineteen years ago)

also he's in movies now or something?

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_Söze

― That one guy that quit, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

also he's in movies now or something?

Of that I have no doubt.

― Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1818500/ ?

― V, Monday, 26 March 2007 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

1. Beware the Moon: Remembering 'An American Werewolf in London' (2008) (filming) (attached) .... Himself

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

I do feel bad that his mom isn't talking to him, though.

― max, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

Now has announced she's not talking to me again.

― marmotwolof, Monday, 26 March 2007 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

aw that's some shit.

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 00:08 (nineteen years ago)

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:V7aR9sVXnjYJ:www.sexgoremutants.co.uk/stray.html+calum+waddell&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=uk

Elsewhere in this issue we are treated to a 5 page report by the now infamous Jay Slater on the CineVegas event back in 2004. Now there are several points here that made me curious as to just why this would warrant publication in 'The Dark Side'. Firstly, the opening page is dominated by a large image from the movie Napoleon Dynamite and the feature itself reads like a fan boys slobbering wet dream misadventures in standing close to star names like Jack Nicholson and Sean Penn; you have to ask - what is this feature doing in a magazine covering the horror genre? The whole thing simply looks it has been pulled off a dusty shelf as page count filler but in truth is simply another exercise in sycophantic self promotion by Slater himself with his self gratifying travelogue piece. That said though, Slater does manage to redeem himself somewhat with a nice informative and knowledgeable interview with obscure exploitation actress Geretta Geretta (aka Janna Ryan) showing that he still has at least some level of skill. The same though sadly cannot be said of his protégé Calum W*dd*ll who pops up elsewhere in the magazine with an interview with screenplay writer Joe Stefano. The problem here is not with the quality of the article, the responses from Stefano are fascinating and entertaining, what generally always taints Waddell's work is the obvious fact that he really knows little about (or even bothers to research) the genre he is so desperate to get his name attached to. What we have here is a young man who would probably sell his mothers soul to get his name in lights in any publishing or industry by-line, but being in the right place with the right people does not an informed critic or journalist make.

― Frogman Henry, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 04:13 (nineteen years ago)

LJ's probably going to talk about all this on his radio show now. A small intimate audience of decent folks who he can tell about how the internet done him wrong.

Lex otm.

― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 11:03 (nineteen years ago)

Lex is completely OTM. In fact, I don't know if anyone anywhere has ever been more OTM than Lex re: this entire situation.

Also, since his mom has apparently stopped talking to him before, we can assume:

a) he's done irritating shit in the past that has aggravated her to death;
b) she's gotten over it and started talking to him again.

I might feel sorry for LJ if he appears on international news stories (Star Wars Kid-Style) but when I think about that I continue laughing, so the jury's out.

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 11:53 (nineteen years ago)

hang on is she "not talking to him" again, or "not talking to him again"?

― lex pretend, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

shes probably just using it as an excuse so she can do a bit of diy

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:20 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, you'd take any excuse for a break from the endless torrents of nothing, woudn't you?

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:21 (nineteen years ago)

I bet she's just jealous because she read about other ILXors who did things like that with their mother.

― StanM, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:22 (nineteen years ago)

mum have you heard this delectable slice of wonder from Gomez in 1999, a veritable smorgasbord of pantheon busting eclectic vignettes of genius that rival Lo Fidelity Allstars at their logic defying genre twisting best, its like Orbital remxing YES! OMG mum when i think aobut how i can play this on my first date with the girl with the books around her neck

louis, go to your room

yes mum, but I'LL BE BACK

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

OMG this is the best piece of toast of the last five YEARS

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

er somehow he kind of became dj martian

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

actually, when you think about it, in a kind of a weird way....

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think Martian was EVER that "SQUEE!" about anything.

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

hang on is she "not talking to him" again, or "not talking to him again"?

I read it as the former but, even if she meant the latter, odds are they will actually talk to each other again.

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

Somehow the prospect of DJ Martian having a mother had never occurred to me.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:39 (nineteen years ago)

same odds as LJ returning to ILX -- pretty damn good I'd wager. and that's almost too bad cause learning a lesson the hard way is exactly what the guy needs to do.

― m coleman, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:39 (nineteen years ago)

Thomas Tallis 2: The Tallesining

― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:42 (nineteen years ago)

PLANK mother burning dinner again! Clearly "dum dum" mum hasn't been to Fratton Park this season.

With proper motivation, Harry Redknapp could cook fish fingers without burning them.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

I hope he doesn't come back. While I'm grateful for the killfile, my running Greasmonkey on three machines -- all for his benefit -- is surely only giving him the attention he craves : (

― caek, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

i just saw him walking down the street, he was headed through a doorway that had a bucket of paint balanced on it.

― 600, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

Lex is completely OTM. In fact, I don't know if anyone anywhere has ever been more OTM than Lex re: this entire situation.

True but it doesn't make what the other person did any better and personally it still makes me very uncomfortable. I'd like to think that we did the decent thing and admonished the person involved, even banned them!

LJ will be back, of that have no doubt but hopefully he'll have learned something. Doubtful but one can only hope. How he is resisting this thread I'll never know. He'll be on it soon enough I wager.

― kv_nol, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

http://myspace-454.vo.llnwd.net/01229/45/41/1229021454_s.jpg

"Hello! My name is Mr... Reggaj!"

― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

I don't get how the Mods can't SEE the person who did the YMYTD THING.
Maybe this is a bit elementary school, but...shouldn't that person be banned?
Somebody registered. And fucked someone's life up.
It makes me feel a bit queasy about my status on this forum.
LJ asked for everything he received, but...he's friggin' twenty years old and doesn't need to be publicly shamed more than he already is.
Who registered and linked?

― aimurchie, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

Weird. I am now jumping boards!

― aimurchie, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

The mods here can't know who did something on another site - the mods at YTMND may have an IP address or email address in their logs somewhere, but they probably won't just give that information to our mods.

― StanM, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

Also HI DERE, CRAZY PEOPLE DO MEAN SHIT ON THE INTERNET, NEWS AT 11 IN 1999

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

But Louis was only 6 years old then! (approx.)

― StanM, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

Plus YTMND has fought off threats of legal action from Sega and the Church of Scientology, I'm pretty sure a 19 year old Britisher isn't going to have them shaking their knees. Plus, you know, Josh Ballard may have a little reason to feel that perhaps his personal internet words shouldn't be on there, so there's precedent. Except Louis isn't dead.

― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

"odds are they will actually talk to each other again."

qft

― That one guy that quit, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

Why would ILX even suggest suing another site for taking material verbatim when ILX does the same all the time (i.e., kingfish political threads.)?

I'm sorry, but L-Jag has no sympathy from me.

― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

~~Dog Latin~~
~~Louis Jagger~~

...

― jim, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

if louis's mum had googled her son even before the ytmnd page went up she wouldn't have had much difficulty finding embarrassing stuff about him, for example some utter bastard calling for him to be 'banned'.

― That one guy that quit, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

Is his mum's name Mick?

― nickalicious, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

Just sayin' - that would rule.

― nickalicious, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

don't be ridiculous, that's a man's name.

it is in fact jade.

― That one guy that quit, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Louis Jagger Doesn't Change Facial Expressions

― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

Could whomever obliged Dr D in his polite request here please explain how not doing so for LJ isn't hypocrytical?

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

well pash is the only mod to express his reasons why and i doubt he zapped dr c's thread. it would be nice if the mod that did would explain the diff but i doubt thats going to happen.

― chaki, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

It wasn't me who deleted the Dr C thread in question and I wouldn't personally have done so. But the main reason I wasn't moved to oblige LJ's request upthread is a) it's his fault for being so astonishingly short-sighted and b) the original post is all over the fucking boards and probably saved on a couple of creeps' hard drives as well and I'm not seeking out every appearance of it.

Pash said he'd look into getting the original thread de-indexed, that should be enough really.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

The person who registered and linked from ILX should be banned.
That's what i was saying.
Fuck it, I'm not worried myself, but it is a bit INSANE that this happened.
Carry on.

― aimurchie, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not advocating zapping LJ's thread, I just think a mod in the NU-no-admin-log-era should have known they would have been opening a can of worms by fufilling a request w/o a discussion on it.

Is it because Dr. C is an otherwise responsible poster who couldn't have known his thread would end up the way it did? Is it because he asked nicely? Is it because the rep of non-ILXors was at stake? I never got to read it, it got zapped pretty fast.

If we're not getting admin log back, at least use this board to explain non-routine admin actions.

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:18 (nineteen years ago)

xxpost

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

I've no idea, I never actually read the thread in question before it was deleted - sorry.

― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

It's just really bad minded of somebody to do that. I just hope they are very ashamed of themselves. Maybe they shouldn't be banned, but if the IP was requested without threatening, at least they could be unmasked and maybe they would leave themselves. That's probably a terrible idea, but it seems pretty just to me, not that handing out justice is the administrators job (I think). Disregard this post!

― I know, right?, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:23 (nineteen years ago)

The person who registered and linked from ILX should be banned.

marissa, is that you?

srsly wtf are you talking about? there is no link to ilx? there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere? you wouldn't even have to register to post on ilx to be able to do this, actually? what are a couple people not understanding about this? not to mention if you're going to ban people for doing douchebaggy things then, well, goodbye 98% of the board.

― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

and YTMND is NOT going to hand an IP over. Talk about setting a precedent.

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

DNFTairmuchie!!

― am0n, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

I can't believe this thread is still going. Seriously who gives a shit about this guy and his drama?

― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, Schef....
I'm sort of stunned at your unwarranted vitriol.
Thanks for the marissa comparison - more you than me, I think.

Fuck you.
I don't know what DNFT means.

― aimurchie, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere
there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere

― am0n, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.tdubel.com/artikkelit/kuvat/emulxbox/pelit/amiga/zak.png

― am0n, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere

^ this sums it up. To the best of my knowledge, ytmnd does not publically display the ip data of people who make pages there (wikipedia is the only place that I can think of that does off the top of my head). I emailed Louis a couple of days ago & suggested that he try and get the data out of them, but I suspect his chances of getting this are slim-zero. If someone from another board came to me asking for IP data from one of our users, there'd have to be some pretty major reason for me to do so. I can't actually think of a reason, tbh. If I were to approach ytmnd asking for the ip data of the person who put this up, they'd tell me to fuck off, face it.

I do not know who deleted Dr C's thread. I tend towards deleting individual posts from threads, myself, and then only if there are some serious IRL circumstances for doing so.

If LJ had requested deletion of his post, I might well have considered that a reasonable request under these circumstances, though it would have been locking the stable door after the horse had bolted in this case. I didn't delete the whole thread b/c a bunch of other people had posted to it, non related to LJ's story, and I don't think it would have been cool to shitcan those ppls thoughts because of that.

― Pashmina, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:38 (nineteen years ago)

I do not know who deleted Dr Cs thread

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:44 (nineteen years ago)

Whatever. My understanding was that someone registered just to do this to LJ - and I believe every registration is monitored?
I have to sign in - I assume everyone else does - and it would not be hard to figure out who/where I am. it seems, to me, that somebody did this on purpose, and was registered under "Ilxor".
I'm asking a fucking question here, as opposed to amusing myself to death with my perceived cleverness.

But if making fun of me makes you happy, go right ahead. There are several threads that you can do so on, as well. Go for it.

― aimurchie, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:46 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not making fun of you?

You don't have to sign in to read any thread on ILX, you only have to sign in to post here. In theory anyone could copy & paste any text they find here into any other board or WTFE on the interweb. I would assume the person who made the YTMND page is a regular here, why would anyone else bother?

YTMND is a completely different site to ILX, it has no connection with us, nor us to them, except (presumbably) for a (small) number of common users.

― Pashmina, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:51 (nineteen years ago)

aimurchie:

1. Log Out.

2. Click this

3. Can you see this now-famous pos that begins with "erm, as it was all for a dare there was no consummation, but i was manually...." ???????????????

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

Grady, deleted threads are just flagged as deleted, it doesn't actually say who deleted it.

― Pashmina, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:54 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:54 (nineteen years ago)

Grady, deleted threads are just flagged as deleted, it doesn't actually say who deleted it.

i understand that. and i think it's a problem. that was the point i was trying to make.

― g®▲Ðұ, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:55 (nineteen years ago)

Aim, soemone registered to YTMND with the name ILXOR not here. Get it yet?

― chaki, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:59 (nineteen years ago)

I wrote that post before Pashmina's eloquent response.
xpost, whatever.
Thanks, Pashmina, now I understand a bit more. I figured that "seeing" the IP/server of an individual who registered - in this case, ilxor - was enough to ban that individual.
I know you can't ask another board to do anything. Nor would I want that to happen!
For fuck's sake, my user name brings up lots of stuff that i might not be completely happy about.
Live and learn, etc.
Thank you, Alison

― aimurchie, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

And yes, Chaki and everyone, I get it! It scares me a bit...so I'll keep my enemies close, I guess.
Thank you all for explaining this. Thanks, Alison

― aimurchie, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 00:19 (nineteen years ago)

so I'll keep my enemies close, I guess.

always a good plan

― elan, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)

It's a phrase. meant to ridicule the idea that the internet is the enemy. But, yup, it is a good plan.

― aimurchie, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 02:00 (nineteen years ago)

the person doesnt need to be registered here.
the person could already be registered here

go to, say, bbc.co.uk, take one of their pics, post it here. how would BBC know it was you that had taken it? ilxmods would know, but how would bbc know

^^ is what has happened

― 600, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 07:01 (nineteen years ago)

and even then

1. go to internet cafe
2. register new account
3. post unsuitable material

^^^ what would you ban?

― 600, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 07:02 (nineteen years ago)

i think my favourite part of all this, is the way that lj is sort of just waiting, waiting, like somebody hiding in a cupboard getting ready to jump out and surprise someone, in a week or so if he can hold out that long with,....

"hi guys im back:D"

― 600, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

this 'Ilxor' should be banned from facebook too mebbe?

― That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

I bet Louis will return to fish his unfished business.

― StanM, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 07:33 (nineteen years ago)

I still think it's like leaving your bike unlocked and then complaining it has been stolen. Of course it's wrong for someone to take it, but you should have locked it.

I think making that YTMND page was a really shitty thing to do, but it doesn't warrant a witch hunt. Google LJ's name and you still could have found that picture, that story and more, all on ILX, even without being registered here. All that ILXor did was link it all together on one page.

Also, a simple "haha you didn't actually believe that story, did you? I was just kidding!" could have defused this a bit, I think (regardless of whether it really happened or not), but now it's probably too late for LJ to start saying that. Especially since I just suggested it.

― StanM, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 08:00 (nineteen years ago)

(man I think a lot! once every paragraph!)

― StanM, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 08:02 (nineteen years ago)

there is no way to know who came onto ilx, copied a post and a picture and took it elsewhere

Fair enough. Doesn't make what happened any less shitty. Pash, Matt I think what Grady said above about knowing what's going on: I think that if neither of you know who deleted the Dr. C thread then the system in place might need tweaking. A google group maybe?

aimurchie, no one is going for you (least of all me). I'd leave your real name out of posts if poss, no point in making tracking your posts down too easy :)

i think my favourite part of all this, is the way that lj is sort of just waiting, waiting, like somebody hiding in a cupboard getting ready to jump out and surprise someone, in a week or so if he can hold out that long with,....

"hi guys im back:D"

So OTM. Maybe he should be ip banned for his own good (not a joke btw, it does him little good being here)?

Also I'd like to say that I agree with StanM in his post above mine about how easily this could have all been made go away.

― kv_nol, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 09:25 (nineteen years ago)

Nine tenths of Louis' posts were uncontroversial. I don't want him IP banned, he's ILXor family now. It's not like he'd be the hundred and first person to quit and then come back, is it?

― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 10:35 (nineteen years ago)

For once, I don't think anyone is actually advocating banning Louis.

Amazing, isn't it?

― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 10:57 (nineteen years ago)

Shut door/horse bolted really though now, isn't it?

― tissp, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:02 (nineteen years ago)

For once, I don't think anyone is actually advocating banning Louis.

I was! Help those who can't help themselves etc.

― kv_nol, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

i think it was when i was considering saying "BAN LOUIS JAGGER" in that chewbacca thread that i realized the meme needed a bit of a rest to retain its freshness.

― That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

Who actually coined "BAN LOUIS JAGGER", anyway?

― Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:57 (nineteen years ago)

http://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Last_words&diff=prev&oldid=423905

― That one guy that quit, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:02 (nineteen years ago)

OMG, he's famous!

http://www.ebabylone.net/encyclopedia/en/b/a/n/Ban.html

link

link

― StanM, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:09 (nineteen years ago)

Darramous must be pissed.

― John Justen, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 16:06 (nineteen years ago)

lolz!

― g-kit, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://photos-376.ak.facebook.com/ip002/v59/118/91/507603881/n507603881_13376_4946.jpg

― JW, Friday, 13 April 2007 00:48 (nineteen years ago)

http://cover6.cduniverse.com/CDUCoverart/Adult/Large/Front/82089160081.jpg

― Dom Passantino, Friday, 13 April 2007 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

You guys have to get over your crush, it's kind of creepy...

― kv_nol, Friday, 13 April 2007 11:55 (nineteen years ago)

facebook is locked at work. jon, what am i missing?

― modestmickey, Friday, 13 April 2007 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

Lou Jag raping a dog.

― Dom Passantino, Friday, 13 April 2007 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

Fuck's sake, Dom.

― Pashmina, Friday, 13 April 2007 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.