suggest ban sucks (unban LJ)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

seriously

Poll Results

OptionVotes
I find suggest ban useless 13
I find suggest ban useful (ED: who has this ever stopped from posting) 12


LUTE JOINTS (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)

damn is this why he got perma banned?

myspace password secretary (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)

unban for real

myspace password secretary (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)

yes

Funky Buddha Lounge (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:31 (seventeen years ago)

yes

estela, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:33 (seventeen years ago)

yes on unban

▧_▨ (wilter), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)

http://media.bigoo.ws/content/gif/expression/expression_27.gif

▧_▨ (wilter), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)

can we make suggest ban like a 90 minute thing or something, cause i think its pretty serious lols when people get autobanned, but then i miss them pretty quickly

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:36 (seventeen years ago)

^^

▧_▨ (wilter), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:37 (seventeen years ago)

I wouldn't necessarily disagree on suggested bans being temp
but I think it should be like I said on some other thread where each additional suggest ban is longer and longer (I think temp bans do this now)

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

who has this ever stopped from posting

deeznuts

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:40 (seventeen years ago)

^

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:53 (seventeen years ago)

what specifically do people miss about LJ

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:54 (seventeen years ago)

he's nice

myspace password secretary (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:55 (seventeen years ago)

excuse me while i choke

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:55 (seventeen years ago)

anyone who suggest banned LJ and is now upset that he is banned should probably take a moment of introspection before posting about how it sucks

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:57 (seventeen years ago)

wha louis got banned ????? this is just wrong

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:57 (seventeen years ago)

it's not like the little freak won't be back under a new username in record time

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:59 (seventeen years ago)

how many ppl knew that suggest ban = auto ban?

myspace password secretary (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 01:59 (seventeen years ago)

51, apparently

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:02 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think we'd be having this discussion if either of the next two people with the highest SB counts got autobanned

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:04 (seventeen years ago)

geir and who??

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:07 (seventeen years ago)

RONG and not telling

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:09 (seventeen years ago)

people would totally complain if geir got banned!!

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:10 (seventeen years ago)

but i think that you could probably make a better guess if you gave yourself a while to think about it. xpost

NOTE: not going to confirm or deny any further guesses

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:10 (seventeen years ago)

itd be pretty fun if this list was public right

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:13 (seventeen years ago)

also who the voters are

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:13 (seventeen years ago)

Do mods know who a user has suggest banned?

▧_▨ (wilter), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:14 (seventeen years ago)

can you tell when you've been suggested for ban?

z z. st. z z. uv (Lamp), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:16 (seventeen years ago)

nope, and nope. although i did yellowcard louis warning him when he was at 30, so im not sure it would make much of a difference.

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:16 (seventeen years ago)

whats the time period needed to accumulate 50 suggest bans?

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:19 (seventeen years ago)

that would appear to depend on your posting rate and the signal to nuisance ratio

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:21 (seventeen years ago)

it is kind of funny that this result seems to be pretty much exactly what somebody had in mind

moderation request: democratic bans

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:23 (seventeen years ago)

no u know what i mean - a ban is only handed out if someone gets 50 suggestions in like a month or however long right - so how long is it

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:24 (seventeen years ago)

ha xp

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:25 (seventeen years ago)

do suggest bans dissipate after a while, like if you got 49 on one day and then went months without getting one, would the next one still obtain automatic one

oh is this the same question?

horrible (harbl), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:25 (seventeen years ago)

TOMBOT MADE THE TRAINS RUN ON TIME

bnw, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:26 (seventeen years ago)

I really don't know what the answer is here, I mean I was initially against the suggest ban thing, but the kind of mean-spirited ganging-up that I was convinced would happen is actually not going on at all

I do also agree that there should be an age-out process for the suggest ban tally, like each vote should only last 60 days or so. of course at the end of that 60 days that user could vote again, so if there's a bunch of people you really annoy daily, you won't get much help

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)

towards a more perfect union

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:28 (seventeen years ago)

q: do i have any suggest bans

omar little, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:28 (seventeen years ago)

i was under the impression they do timeout - pretty sure some mod or other mentioned that - if they dont well all be banned eventually

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:29 (seventeen years ago)

a fitting end to ilx

bnw, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:30 (seventeen years ago)

anyone who posts on ILX regularly probably has a couple of suggest bans. which means that most of you will fall victim to this terrible travesty in about 25 years, so get your affairs in order.

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:31 (seventeen years ago)

hint: do not post backwards unicodez

LUTE JOINTS (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:46 (seventeen years ago)

maybe bans aren't really perma ;)

velko, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:50 (seventeen years ago)

Suggest ban is good, but votes should age out, and Tom's idea about the number needed for ban decreasing by half each time or whatevs is good. I don't think that bans should be perm, but in addition to making the number needed decrease each time, why not lengthen the ban period by a factor of 2 each ban?

I Want to Change the Way The Site Looks... (libcrypt), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 02:57 (seventeen years ago)

yeah all that stuff

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:01 (seventeen years ago)

theres also just registering a new account right

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:03 (seventeen years ago)

no that only works for gershy

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:04 (seventeen years ago)

I haven't heard this enunciated, but I'll bet that ILX policy is that bans apply to people, not login names.

I Want to Change the Way The Site Looks... (libcrypt), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:05 (seventeen years ago)

there are only 12 users, the rest are paste

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:06 (seventeen years ago)

Not that anyone could EVER figure out who loujags is under another login name, NO! (xp)

I Want to Change the Way The Site Looks... (libcrypt), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:06 (seventeen years ago)

I really thought suggest bans were for temporary bans, or at the very least, good only for a certain amount of time.

I mean, hell. You could pick up a DWI tonight and still have a clean record again before the Obama's first term ends.

⊕-----⊕-----⊕ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:09 (seventeen years ago)

here's an idea, if you don't want people permabanned, suggest ban wisely!

;n_n; (tehresa), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:13 (seventeen years ago)

i don't understand how, after deeznuts got suggest permabanned, people could not understand how this works...

;n_n; (tehresa), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:14 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't know deeznuts was permabanned because of the suggest bans!

⊕-----⊕-----⊕ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:15 (seventeen years ago)

Anyhow, now I'm never going to know why Louis was talking about oreos earlier today.

⊕-----⊕-----⊕ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:17 (seventeen years ago)

and what abt all those unwritten good luck usa poems - ilxors are being deprived of poetry right now - unban lj!

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:18 (seventeen years ago)

who will co-mod i love cricket now??

velko, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:20 (seventeen years ago)

yah mods should be totes unbannable

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:21 (seventeen years ago)

and what abt all those unwritten good luck usa poems - ilxors are being deprived of poetry right now - unban lj!

― SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Monday, November 10, 2008 10:18 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

so true--the real victim here is the poetry-loving ilc community

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:21 (seventeen years ago)

yah mods should be totes unbannable

lol chaki

velko, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

yah mods should be totes unbannable

― SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 14:21 (1 minute ago) Bookmark

do not agree

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

xpost

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

anyway guys calm down I'm sure when somebody whose opinion actually matters decides they give a shit this will all be taken care of

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:23 (seventeen years ago)

Who would that be?

⊕-----⊕-----⊕ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:27 (seventeen years ago)

maybe there could be a suggest retain button so posters could earn offset credits.

estela, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 03:59 (seventeen years ago)

suggest obtain

horrible (harbl), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:01 (seventeen years ago)

estela dropping the science!

;n_n; (tehresa), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:01 (seventeen years ago)

anytime somebody contributes positively to ilx as a community "suggest keep" xp lol @ "suggest obtain"

BIG HOOS' macaroni is off the motherfucking chain (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:02 (seventeen years ago)

just got obtained

velko, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:05 (seventeen years ago)

much hard offed

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:07 (seventeen years ago)

i like that idea but didnt the thumbs up/thumbs down system already get vetoed

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:13 (seventeen years ago)

yeah srsly if people couldn't manage to be all growed up wrt thumps up/down on tiny fake ILX, i have no hope for it on big dumb real ILX

CHARMING LMAO (John Justen), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:27 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.michaelhyatt.com/fromwhereisit/iStock_000003657557XSmall.jpg

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 04:29 (seventeen years ago)

it might be nice if posters could give themselves a thumbs up as a way of pointing out they had been otm on a thread.

estela, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:08 (seventeen years ago)

you could call it the lj button

Edward III, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:09 (seventeen years ago)

or the SBJ button

thereminimum chips (electricsound), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:09 (seventeen years ago)

if lj were here he'd call you out for being redundant with that zing, edward iii

Funky Buddha Lounge (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:11 (seventeen years ago)

RIP

Edward III, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:20 (seventeen years ago)

omar you have one

jergins, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:27 (seventeen years ago)

lj should kick it for a few weeks, seriously: lie on the beach, drink cocktails, walk around berlin. then come up with a new login. we'll know it's him after the third post and we'll all lol and move on

jergins, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:30 (seventeen years ago)

thats a standard week for those oxbridge types anyway

badg, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 05:40 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, jeez, the guy can always fall on snorting coke off a rich girl's right tit if ILX doesn't work out for him. Relax.

Germany's second-favourite Australian fat leg spin bowler (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:08 (seventeen years ago)

Are LJ (unban) & deeznuts (never unban) the only two to get SBed out?

2nd Black President (The Reverend), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:42 (seventeen years ago)

Anyone who can't cope with posting on a message board without suggest bans and thumbs up/down etc is pretty fucking pathetic. There's no need for them.

Enrique (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:59 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe we should just reset everyone's Suggest Ban tally to zero for Christmas. Peace and goodwill to all dudes and all that.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 13:25 (seventeen years ago)

^^^ thinking like a true Christian

Uncle Shavedlongcock (max), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)

What if you only celebrate Kwanza?

Spritz con Bitter (Ed), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)

wite dread

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 13:27 (seventeen years ago)

After Jagger told me that he'd got the "you have 40 suggest bans" message, I suggest banned him for lulz. LJ truly is the Kitty Genovese of ILX.

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)

Haw, I suggest banned you for admitting that.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)

i thought suggest bans were for temp bans!

i love to hear this again and again (gbx), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, me too. I think it was said so in the suggest ban thread, or at least no one mentioned that they would lead to permanent ban.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)

you guys need to read the FAQ already.

the way i should be (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)

i wonder who dropped the 51st SB hammer

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)

What FAQ? I haven't seen any FAQ since the code change.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)

Check it out right here.

the way i should be (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 20:55 (seventeen years ago)

JESUS GUYS JUST MAKE IT BE A WEEK LONG TEMP BAN

♪☺♫☻ USA (gr8080), Tuesday, 11 November 2008 22:56 (seventeen years ago)

unban LJ

why has this never worked on Vision, he's the only one I really want banned.

I know, right?, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 23:47 (seventeen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Wednesday, 12 November 2008 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

At this difficult time, only changeable user-names can keep our spirits up.

Have Your Sega (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 00:13 (seventeen years ago)

Botched the gag as per usual.

Good Luck, Lewis J! (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 00:14 (seventeen years ago)

why has this never worked on Vision, he's the only one I really want banned.

― I know, right?, Tuesday, 11 November 2008 23:47 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Wondering this as well. Are awful posters who stick to ILM going to be banned a lot less than awful posters that spread themselves around the site?

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:38 (seventeen years ago)

yes

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

for instance i have never heard of this vision fellow

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:42 (seventeen years ago)

he has a certain. . . what do you call it. . . aesthetic?

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:42 (seventeen years ago)

like this? http://www.80stees.com/images/products/Psycho_Stick_Vision_Street_Wear-T.jpg

SNAKES! (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:48 (seventeen years ago)

he's like a sockpuppet with a big toenail hole in its face.

estela, Wednesday, 12 November 2008 01:53 (seventeen years ago)

sorta like a cross between the last two posts

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 12 November 2008 02:00 (seventeen years ago)

It's not moderator tampering that's the issue there - it's user tampering. As you know, I have actually coded the thing that and waht is asking for (a 'suggest ban' button that clocks up votes and then just automatically bans someone when the votes reach a certain level). I agree with you though, it would all go wrong really quickly.

― Keith, Wednesday, August 6, 2008 3:28 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
keith is at defcon caressing the switch

― Just got offed, Wednesday, August 6, 2008 3:29 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

mr. mayan end times guy (The Reverend), Wednesday, 12 November 2008 08:57 (seventeen years ago)

Thankfully Vision has now moved to ILE so hopefully he'll be 50'd up before, say, Friday.

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 13 November 2008 00:41 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i'm going to SB him now, i forgot to

horrible (harbl), Thursday, 13 November 2008 00:42 (seventeen years ago)

I have read professionally Lacan, Derrida, Deleuze, just fyi.

Lower GI Joe (libcrypt), Thursday, 13 November 2008 04:54 (seventeen years ago)

btw i am going to suggest ban every post made on ilm until everyone who posts there is banned and ilm withers and dies

metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

^ new 77 project if thread wasn't locked

metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

i fully support this endevour

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)

why?

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

To show the world it only takes a nation of fifty to hold us back.

⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

didn't see this til today but would've voted pro SB making it a tie (not that it means shit)

Thematically it's like a queer-Pipecock (blueski), Thursday, 13 November 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

so can i suggest ban someone only once or can i hit them 50 times and say a happy bye bye!

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Friday, 14 November 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

Think about it.

Lower GI Joe (libcrypt), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

Keith is, after all, a member of ILX and has been for some years.

Lower GI Joe (libcrypt), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

that doesnt answer my question at all

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

im not even 100% sure who keith is

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

Keith created ILX2. He is a god among trolls.

Have you ever seen that Simpsons episode where they each get to shock each other? Imagine that they had 1000000 volts at their disposal.

Lower GI Joe (libcrypt), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)

The answer to your question, Sunny, is only once.

Pashmina, Friday, 14 November 2008 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

okay. thanks. i was about to try it out on libcrypt for experimental purposes

a country packed with ponies (sunny successor), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

I think I SB'd loujags once, but I kind of regret it now.

Lower GI Joe (libcrypt), Friday, 14 November 2008 18:12 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

rip gabbneb

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)

mods are manipulating suggest ban totals fyi

^^ the only way to explain tuomas imo

meme economist (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

Okay, so now Gabbneb got banned too. As far as I know he hasn't really done anything wrong, at least nothing that would've gotten him banned according to the guidelines we used to have. Shouldn't the suggest ban function be deleted or radically changed by now, or do we really want to turn ILX into a board where only the consensus opinion is allowed and everyone else will get banned?

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:00 (sixteen years ago)

ftr, what you are complaining about is not what is happening (esp. given that gabbneb's opinions mirror something like 85% of the board)

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

Why did he get banned then?

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

also, I'm not sure if you realize this, but gross misrepresentations like this are among the things that are making people want to suggest ban you because they come across as trolling, much as gabbneb's absolutist pronouncements and incessant board-lawyering came across as trolling

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)

so really, you can continue doing this if you want to but don't be surprised if you suddenly find yourself banned

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

So he got banned because of "absolutist pronouncements" and "board lawyering"? What does that mean?

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

imo sbs should be temporary.

meme economist (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:07 (sixteen years ago)

i dunno what you worried about t-dog. the mods are blatantly protecting you.

meme economist (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:07 (sixteen years ago)

why don't we wait for the 51 people who clicked on the "suggest ban" link next to his name to explain this to you

xp: actually no, we aren't

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)

WHO GIVES A SHIT

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

FEEL THE LOVE

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

whiney chill out

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:10 (sixteen years ago)

TUOMAS HE WAS A DICK AND FIFTY PEOPLE WANTED HIM BANNED ENOUGH TO CLICK A BUTTON TO BAN HIM

it's darn and ielle is hot (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

51, actually

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

hay max didnt u promise never to post on these threads anymore

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

51, actually

― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:12 (52 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Probably a lot more if Justen really was deducting noms from his total whenever there was a "ban gabbneb" thread.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

51 doesn't sound like very much considered how many registered users (including sockpuppets) ILX has.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

hi! if you make me ilc moderator i swear on my mothers grave i will never post to a meta thread about 77 ever again

― max, Tuesday, February 3, 2009 11:07 AM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

is this thread some martyr shit to bring you up to 51 in solidarity

it's darn and ielle is hot (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

i'd like to hear what country matters has to say about the effectiveness of the suggest ban program

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

some ppl learn from past experiences

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

u technicalitied yr way out this time max... THIS TIME

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

LJ on a keepin' it positive kick of late. xxxpost

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

i'm sure it's been mentioned before but i would suggest a "suggest remove suggest ban" button to be added and only when the aggregate total reaches 50... you get the idea.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

not that that would likely have saved gabbneb though.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

you kids with your ideas!

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

maybe we should have a "send bitchslap" button that sends an email to the poster saying "srsly, stop being a dick"

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:24 (sixteen years ago)

also there should be a place for recipes

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:25 (sixteen years ago)

like a button you can hit where then you can put recipes

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:25 (sixteen years ago)

imo we should try to hav as many buttons as possible

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

let's have a 'thanks' or 'kudos' feature so we can track the most useful posts.

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

suggest budden

it's darn and ielle is hot (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

Roasted Brussels Sprouts

http://images.allrecipes.com/site/allrecipes/area/community/userphoto/small/132174.jpg

PREP TIME 15 Min
COOK TIME 45 Min
READY IN 1 Hr

INGREDIENTS

* 1 1/2 pounds Brussels sprouts, ends trimmed and yellow leaves removed
* 3 tablespoons olive oil
* 1 teaspoon kosher salt
* 1/2 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper

* add to recipe box Add to Recipe Box
My folders:
* add to shopping list Add to Shopping List
* Customize Recipe
* add a personal note Add a Personal Note

DIRECTIONS

1. Preheat oven to 400 degrees F (205 degrees C).
2. Place trimmed Brussels sprouts, olive oil, kosher salt, and pepper in a large resealable plastic bag. Seal tightly, and shake to coat. Pour onto a baking sheet, and place on center oven rack.
3. Roast in the preheated oven for 30 to 45 minutes, shaking pan every 5 to 7 minutes for even browning. Reduce heat when necessary to prevent burning. Brussels sprouts should be darkest brown, almost black, when done. Adjust seasoning with kosher salt, if necessary. Serve immediately.

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

excelsior o_O etc all those threads should hav their own buttons there should be some auto image macro buttons some recipe buttons a kudos button that changes the post to hot pink so everyone sees how great it is a post disappearing button a suggest mod button to elevate people to mod status all sorts of buttons any and all buttons

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/bridget/biden.jpg

Suggest Biden

David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

he's so cute

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

did u see how he was beaming when obama mentioned how tough he was the other nite

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

lol ya. high wattage

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

maybe we should have a "send bitchslap" button that sends an email to the poster saying "srsly, stop being a dick"

It's called "clicking on the user's name and sending them a webmail".

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

Honestly surprised at this.

----> (libcrypt), Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

it was his new bragging abt pulling hot chix accusing people of being jealous of him and posting on rap threads phase that really did him in imo

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

his heigl-lohan phase if you will

s1ocki, Thursday, 26 February 2009 16:28 (sixteen years ago)

I still agree that suggest ban sucks, but I am looking forward to trying to guess which newcomer in the next three months is really gabbneb.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 26 February 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

the problem with suggest ban is that it works on an outlier basis. there's a bell curve to the ILX user base that I will crudely sketch as follows:

completely offensive ... general dicks ... occasionally annoying ... cool folks ... wouldn't hurt a fly

I'd say the bulge is in "occasional annoying". there a general tone of acid wit & vitriol on the board that is one of its hallmarks. it's a blessing and curse. suggest ban first takes the outliers in the completely offensive category, then it starts working on the general dicks. eventually the norm starts shifting and the occasionally annoying start being taken out (which seems to be the point we are at). and once that threshold is passed you have normalized yourself into a stepford board of quiet, well behaved folk (i.e. boring).

maybe that's the suggest ban supporters' utopian/authoritarian fantasy, but most of my favorite posters fall in the general dick to occasionally annoying spectrum (dan, schef, ethan, morbz, shakey) and I'd hate to see them get "disappeared". and those of you holding up lj as the poster child of suggest ban potty-training must have missed his latest superlative lapse in judgment on the ILP board. I can't believe dude can avoid getting banned again, and though he's a taste I've never particularly acquired, it's kind of a pointless routine to ban him if he's just going to come rolling back again like a low impulse control bad penny.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

for all the tl;dr's out there:

they came for deeznuts and I said nothing

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

deez was the only true victim of SB

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

eventually the norm starts shifting and the occasionally annoying start being taken out (which seems to be the point we are at).

We are nowhere near that point.

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

^

Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

his latest superlative lapse in judgment on the ILP board

ysi?

meme economist (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

fwiw no one you have listed is actually anywhere near in danger of getting suggest-banned

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

also the lapse of judgment you mention resulted in a sub-board ban so, as far as I know, the situation has been resolved

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

can i know my totals?

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

check yr email

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

eventually the norm starts shifting and the occasionally annoying start being taken out (which seems to be the point we are at).

We are nowhere near that point.

whether or not gabbnebb ever posts again is of no great concern to me, as far as I know he's just ILX's paul begala. but I couldn't in good faith put him into any other category than occasionally annoying.

and I'm not saying oh noes sky is falling pokkyclypse is here! I'm talking about trend and drift. I don't like the direction things are headed if annoying but relatively benign entities like gabbnebb are getting the boot. maybe I missed his rapey / racist / psychotic posts and you all can clue me in to these.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

but that point would only hold true if everyone in your first two categories had been shitcanned, or at least a good number of them. they haven't.

Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

what's ILP?

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

can i know my totals?

me 2 plz

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

there's a lamp now?

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

what's ILP?

― Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:26 PM (26 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i love poppage?

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

i just suggest banned lamp so that he would have at least 1

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

lol weak-trolling the economy/is real threads has to've netted me at least a couple

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

(check yr email)

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

dude after the who would win in a fight breakdowns ur safe for life imo xpost

k3vin k., Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

and I'm not saying oh noes sky is falling pokkyclypse is here! I'm talking about trend and drift. I don't like the direction things are headed if annoying but relatively benign entities like gabbnebb are getting the boot.

OTM.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

eth are you gonna reveal how many you have

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

49

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

but that point would only hold true if everyone in your first two categories had been shitcanned, or at least a good number of them. they haven't.

Also, one person's "occasionally annoying" can be 51 other people's "general dick".

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

but that point would only hold true if everyone in your first two categories had been shitcanned, or at least a good number of them. they haven't.

― Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:26 PM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark

this won't behave like a triage line at the ER, where the greatest dicks are served first. it's an organic system that will trend towards normalization in a non-serialized fashion.

what's ILP?

― Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:26 PM (22 seconds ago) Bookmark

I love people making

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)

Also, one person's "occasionally annoying" can be 51 other people's "general dick".

exactly, which means a minority of people who care enough to click suggest ban can remove a poster that the silent majority have no problems with.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

Everytime I read this thread, I regret my suggest bans.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, based on what people have said on various threads it seems only certain people use the suggest ban function regularly, whereas the majority of people here probably don't really care about it at all, which means that the particular tastes of a certain subset of posters decide who gets banned.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

I think if you are being a general dick to 51 people on the boards, you should seriously reconsider your posting style/why you are here.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

x-post to Edward

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

I think if you are being a general dick to 51 people on the boards, you should seriously reconsider your posting style/why you are here.

I dunno, some people here have implied that they use suggest ban on posters even when they merely have a "challenging opinion" on music, or on the "smashability" of certain celebrities. That doesn't necessarily equate with being a general dick.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

we've had three sb bans.

i can't see how you'd be comfortable drawing general trends from this out of however many hundred/thousand regular posters.

and it's not like all regular users are equally allotted to the 5 groups you're using for example- the vast majority would definitely fall into the 'no harm' or 'cool posters'.

and none of the three banned users would come anywhere close (not an attack on LJ or gabbnebb, tbh they'd probably admit that they've pushed buttons far above the average poster)

so i don't really see what statistical analysis of three exceptional cases is proving here

Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

Everytime I read this thread, I regret my suggest bans.

― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:37 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

just keep focusing on how good it feels when you click the button

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas have you ever actually read a gabbneb post

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno, some people here have implied that they use suggest ban on posters even when they merely have a "challenging opinion" on music, or on the "smashability" of certain celebrities. That doesn't necessarily equate with being a general dick.

― Tuomas, Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:42 AM (51 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

name names

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Button,_Button_(The_Twilight_Zone)

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas, considering the amount of posters and beefs on ilx there has been a really small amount of SB bannings (unless i missed a bunch - all i can think of is deez, lj and gabbneb - im sure theres one or two more)

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

oh xp

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

do you really think all of those are serious

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

you have got to be fucking kidding

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

considering, as an empirical matter, that only 3 sb's have happened

xp

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

I was going to try to help you out with some advice on this topic but instead I think I will let your faux-naive trolling take you where it will. Have fun.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas, considering the amount of posters and beefs on ilx there has been a really small amount of SB bannings (unless i missed a bunch - all i can think of is deez, lj and gabbneb - im sure theres one or two more)

Well yeah, but the suggest ban function has been available only for 6 months or so. I'm pretty sure there'll be more and more bannings if this system will go on like this.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

i hav sbd dudes for trivial and comic matters i admit it

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

rip gabbneb

― max, Thursday, February 26, 2009 8:30 AM

http://www2.trafford.com/clientimages2/cv1412086531.jpg

eman, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

Well yeah, but the suggest ban function has been available only for 6 months or so. I'm pretty sure there'll be more and more bannings if this system will go on like this.

― Tuomas, Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:48 AM (48 seconds ago)

"pretty sure" are you. why?

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

im "pretty sure" tuomas has gotten at least one more SB than he would have otherwise for having posted on this thread

k3vin k., Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

me too. and that's the problem.

and it's not like all regular users are equally allotted to the 5 groups you're using for example

they are not, that is why it is a bell curve.

the vast majority would definitely fall into the 'no harm' or 'cool posters'.

I dunno, this board is pretty snarky.

also the point is not who falls in what category and how many of each, but that as outliers are removed, the bell curve does not stay static - you've just redefined what an outlier is. this is a function of not having an objective measuring system (where's the dickometer?).

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

"pretty sure" are you. why?

I can't imagine LJ and Deeznuts and Gabbneb are the only people who are controversial enough to get a lot of SBs. And since SBs are cumulative and apparently have no time limit, it's inevitable others will get banned.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

there's no such thing as an objective measuring system!

besides, if the ppl on the low edge of the curve get banned, it's not as if the ppl on the edge+1 are going to suddenly get that much more annoying to compensate, right? yall are inventing these weird lord of the flies scenarios here

xp well like i said it's an empirical matter. there's no consensus until after the fact. if someone else get's done in then we'll know if they were "really annoying" to enough ppl all along.

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

what is with me an apostrophes lately

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

personal feelings aside it does not at all surprise me that those were the 1st three posters to go

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

Note that ILX has over 10 000 registered posters, so "enough people" = 0,5% of all those.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

the fact that you're posting to this thread right now is more than enough proof that SBs are not even close to eliminating the most annoying posters

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas, you are living, posting proof that your arguments are greatly exaggerated.

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

oh xp again

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

anyone SB'd bothered enough can just come back with new IP and ID anyway

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

do all of those 10,000 ppl post regularly?

do suggest bans happen every day?

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

look, thusfar everyone who's been banned via SB has richly deserved it - all this chicken littling, O WHO'S NEXT THE JEWS I GUESS bullshit is irrelevent until some wildly popular poster is actually banned

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

i want to suggest ban lurkers

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_AZTTM0pKl78/SMw4CR63ewI/AAAAAAAAAYw/Oe_4qAmzG-g/s400/cold+world+hustlers+everyday+thang.jpeg

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

i will be all kinds of mad if the jews get banned

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

losing gabb and shakey mo wouldnt make up for slocki and jbr

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

O WHO'S NEXT THE JEWS I GUESS bullshit is irrelevent until some wildly popular poster is actually banned

But my point is that even those (sometimes) irritating posters make this board richer, I wouldn't want it to be a place where only popular posters remain.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

i liked gabbneb!

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

i like lj

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

i like lj too, he is a bird watcher which i think is p funny

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

Why are you for SBs then?

(x-post)

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

Why are you for SBs then?

(x-post)

― Tuomas, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:05 PM (50 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

living in a democracy doesnt mean you agree with every popular decision

when a finnish president you dont like gets elected do you advocate returning to monarchy?

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

because i understand that a functioning zone of expression is not designed to give ME ME ME exactly what i want at all times

xp

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas shut the fuck up this isn't about board richness or free expression or any high minded bullshit you're just worried you're next

unless there are amazing threads with you <3ing gabbneb, deeznuts and lj 1.0 that i missed

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

is there any way current sb totals could be made public? (sorry if this has been asked already; i haven't read the whole thread.)

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

amazing threads with you <3ing gabbneb, deeznuts and lj

take it to iltmi

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

xp apparently if you ask dan he'll webmail you yours

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

But my point is that even those (sometimes) irritating posters make this board richer, I wouldn't want it to be a place where only popular posters remain.

So your point is that a small minority (51 ppl) should be held to the whims of a smaller minority (you)?

is there any way current sb totals could be made public? (sorry if this has been asked already; i haven't read the whole thread.)

I'm not making the full list public but I will tell you your total if you want to know. I will also publish the following statistics:

245 posters have suggest bans in the single digits.
34 posters have suggest bans in the double digits.
3 posters have 40 or more suggest bans.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

thanks!

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

dan can i know my SB count plz

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

3 posters have 40 or more suggest bans.

tuomas, shakey mo, burt_stanton?

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

i would like to know my total dan plz

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

hey dan will u email me my total?

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

ah what the hell, can i have mine if it's not too much trouble?

k3vin k., Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I'm interested as well, I feel like I'm in the mid 30s. juror8 at gmail dot com, this is a dummy address i'm signed up with.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

Also, the total number of suggest bans accumulated by the 245 single-digit posters is smaller than the total number of suggest bans accumulated by the 34 double-digit posters.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

(lol I will mail all this out but I do actually have some real work to do, plz be patient)

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I'm interested as well, I feel like I'm in the mid 30s.

― Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:12 PM (15 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lookin like it too amirite

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

3 posters have 40 or more suggest bans

This is absolutely thrilling

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

http://i41.tinypic.com/2w2isd2.jpg

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

Dan, I dont want to know mine. Thx.

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

dan feel free to just post my total in the thread

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

hey dan

can i see my total?

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

i would also be intersted in mine

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

i'm not interested in mine

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

that'll cut down on some work for ya

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

I'm interested but I enjoy a good surprise too much to ask

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

he may be old, but i reckon dr morbius is capable of multiple logins.

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

i'm not interested in mine

― Surmounter, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:16 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

sb'd you for this

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

surprise surprise

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

3 posters have 40 or more suggest bans.

tuomas, shakey mo, burt_stanton?

― bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:11 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

im guess tuomas burt n morbs - shakey hasnt posted enough in the sb era to rack up that many

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

What if Tuomas has loads of socks and his repeated pleas to end the suggest ban system are some kind of "stop me before I kill again" shit?

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

ice cr?m do you mind if i sb you now, just to spice things up a little more?

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

go w/what u feel imo

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

im guess tuomas burt n morbs - shakey hasnt posted enough in the sb era to rack up that many

― ice cr?m, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:19 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

true but primaries thread morbz was pre sb too and by the time the system was in place everybody viewed him as a lovable old crank - i know ive never sb'd him

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

thanx ice u a bro

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

np

yah thats prob true xp

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

i was feeling out so i suggest banned myself just now.

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:22 (sixteen years ago)

let me get the next one

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

SB'd max because i didn't like Fever Ray artwork

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

SB'd bluesk if Happy Hour's started.

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

FEEL THE LOVE

― Surmounter

you kids with your ideas!

― Surmounter

he's so cute

― Surmounter

lol ya. high wattage

― Surmounter

i'm not interested in mine

― Surmounter

that'll cut down on some work for ya

― Surmounter

I'm <3'n the Surmounter good vibes today!

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

"today"

mookieproof, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

sb'ed you for meta xpost

k3vin k., Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

But my point is that even those (sometimes) irritating posters make this board richer, I wouldn't want it to be a place where only popular posters remain.

So your point is that a small minority (51 ppl) should be held to the whims of a smaller minority (you)?

I don't really think I'm the only one who thinks posters shouldn't be banned just for being irritating. Or at least I hope so.

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

you are

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

Dan, if you haven't sent any of these SB totals out yet, I can do a few now while I'm eating lunch.

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

Let them speak now or forever hold each other's pieces xp

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas shut the fuck up this isn't about board richness or free expression or any high minded bullshit you're just worried you're next

If that was true, I wouldn't even post to these threads, would I? :)

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb was a malignant presence, good riddance and keep him away imo. i think a lot of the "hated" posters on here are totally dope folks who just like to bust on people a lot, but you can tell they're good people.

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

i don't want to know my sb total either. man got to have a code.

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

like imo, tuomas, geir, LJ, and whoever else people like to SB are people i would never want to see gone.

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

eh i basically agree with tuomas, at the very least sbs shouldnt be permanent

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

and frankly i know everyone hated him but to me gabbneb was one of the most consistently hilarious posters on this board

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

just got my total, thanks rock !

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

omar and max makin sense in 2009

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas take the principle out of it for a second--is your posting experience really lessened by gabby and deez not being around?

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

i agree w/ max -- s-bans shd be temporary.

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

eh i basically agree with tuomas, at the very least sbs shouldnt be permanent

― max, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:31 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

also i think every time you suggest ban someone you should have to enter in a reason why theyre being suggest banned, which is accessible by the user who was banned

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

like i have XX amnt of bans--but what i really want to know is, why, and which posts of mine were the ones that ppl sbd

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

I remember when Louis was SB'd I was heartbroken. I still miss that guy. But y'know, there's a little bit of him in all our hearts.

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

my personal SB total guess: 15

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

i think it should be like those NYU kids and we should meet in the cafeteria until we get a consensus on how to reach a consensus

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

eh i basically agree with tuomas, at the very least sbs shouldnt be permanent

― max, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:31 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

also i think every time you suggest ban someone you should have to enter in a reason why theyre being suggest banned, which is accessible by the user who was banned

― max, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:33 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

also when theyre banned all the reasons should be displayed in the admin logg

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

Also ILX should grow lips and blow me

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

we deserve to be explained imo

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

i think it should be like those NYU kids and we should meet in the cafeteria until we get a consensus on how to reach a consensus

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:34 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark

what 77 girls are gonna to topless

J0rdan S., Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

whiney pullin out the stops today

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)

Also ILX should grow lips and blow me

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:35 PM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i dont know what this means but youve been really aggro in this thread whiney g. so im sb'ing you

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)

NO BRUTALITY, MAX! YOU ARE ON CAMERA!

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

this is an internet democracy zone do not brutality me

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

loathe in this club

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

Suggest a drop-down menu to save time on SB explanations:

* Gobshite
* Monomaniac
* Kinda creepy
* Knocked over teapot at Teddy Bears' picnic
* Scandinavian

should cover it

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

im "pretty sure" tuomas has gotten at least one more SB than he would have otherwise for having posted on this thread

and all he's done is express disagreement about something! you don't agree with him, great, tell him. he annoys the hell out of you, great, ignore him. if anything tuomas has said on this thread meets the threshold for contributing to his ultimate banning, then ppl need to grow tougher skin, for serious.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

what about multiple charges "Judge" Noodle?

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

Sorry, missed out

* Chaki come-back tour

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

* whiney pro-tuomas board lawyering

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

edward yr really missing the joy in the sb experience - let it in

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas shut the fuck up this isn't about board richness or free expression or any high minded bullshit you're just worried you're next

If that was true, I wouldn't even post to these threads, would I? :)

― Tuomas, Thursday, February 26, 2009 6:29 PM (6 minutes ago)

wow dude if you only knew how much irony is packed into that emoticon for those of us that can see the SB totals

Exodus 14 VS 14 CAGE MATCH FITE (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

* for lulz

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

Obv could still have a write-in as a back-up system

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2213/2199355153_f027d9eb71.jpg

J0rdan S., Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

loving the idea that it's everyone else who has to man up when the tuom-dogg rolls in

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

Also ILX should grow lips and blow me

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:35 PM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i dont know what this means

― max, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:36 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

This means enough with the ILX code-programming fan fiction where there's magical extra buttons and widgets and pop-ups that give full-disclosure on bannination and reasons and statistics and names and sends you an engraved letter when some on SBs you. No one's going to do any of that.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

i hav 25 sbs

thx 2 mods 4 email

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

btw i'm in favor of SBs being only 30 days except in this particular case

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

what?? who the fuck would do that xp

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

if i'm lawyering for tuomas, exhibit a is a posterboard with STFU written on it in my own tears.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

mods, i'm curious about my SB total as well ^_^

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

xps WGW i'm pretty sure everyone knows none of those features are gonna happen

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

if i'm lawyering for tuomas, exhibit a is a posterboard with STFU written on it in my own tears.

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, February 26, 2009 7:42 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

no i meant edward III

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

he is whiney, not Whiney.

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/WilliamCrump63/tuomasisreal.jpg

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

WGW i'm pretty sure everyone knows none of those features are gonna happen

― goole, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:43 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

but it would be AWESOME if they did

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

o no doubt

sorry about your sb situation ice cram

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

thanks mods

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

i just don't get it. how is ice cr? even remotely bannable?

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

im pretty obnoxious and then some are jokes so

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

I'm going to sb everybody who supports sb's in this thread because I don't agree with you and you're irritating me

ARMS RACE

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

but hey not even half way there dont worry guys!

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

EDWARD III HAS A SOCK PUPPET POSSE

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

Omar: webmail sent.

Pashmina, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

Oh, you already got it.

Pashmina, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

That's a fantastic bid for a new 50 SB speed record from Edward there.

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

fyi in my original thread moderation request: democratic bans i suggested an email based ballot not anon 51-takes-all bans

that said, i have agreed with the results of sb-ing esp deezy

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

I can't even remember what d'nuts' steez was?

Pashmina, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

at the time he got sb'ed he was just posting inanely over and over in potentially interesting threads. he's the only poster i've ever sb'ed, which i feel sort of bad about now, but he was crazy irritating at the time.

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

i figured u sb'd me for comparing lol-jindal zings to mr robinsons neighborhood

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

yeah deeznuts should stay gone too imo, no temp bans there

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

WGW i'm pretty sure everyone knows none of those features are gonna happen

― goole, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:43 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

but it would be AWESOME if they did

― ice cr?m, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:45 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink/

New features WRAPPED IN BACON om nom nom with syrup

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

would never sb you ethan, ilx would be 10% as readable w/o you.

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

i have 4 SBs, one of them may have been from myself

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

whiney if you take the bacon off ____________________________

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

New features WRAPPED IN BACON om nom nom with syrup

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:53 PM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

just suggest drowned you for this post

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

re:deezy hed also occasionally say something genuinely creepy and disturbing

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

i have 25--i would guess that around 10 are from posters who were "joking"

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

awwww horseshoe and ethan sittin in a tree!!!!

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

sb'd you for that

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

haaa

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

surmounter cruisin' for my second sb

xposts lol

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

wow i know couple ilxors protesting a lil too hard

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

Whoa, if even well-liked posters like Max have managed to get 25 SBs, well all be banned eventually!

Tuomas, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

i have 24... no way would i have figured max would have more than me

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

ha ha ok i must have more than 15

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

I think I'm caught up on the sb total requests.

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

aww

xp

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

FWIW the sb system in concept is not flawed, just the execution

but apparently we can't talk about it without people getting all

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/invasion23.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

wmc can i get mine again since this thread started

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

look some SB sentences are gonna result in parole but some should not, like i said. like how serial killers should be executed.

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

or how tuomas should be executed

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

sexecuted

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

sorry it's been a long day

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

sb'd for that

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

ditto

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

E: ok, sent

my lunch break is over

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

i think having 25 lends my online persona a dangerous edge it used to be missing

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

i bet chix will find me more attractive now

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

otm

Surmounter, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

of course you'd have to tell them you have 25 SBs on a popular internet msg board first

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

max u should tattoo 25 miniature 'sb's to your left bicep

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

Wonder where deez tattooed his?

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

maybe gabbneb is now drowning in WoP

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

yeah like a photo of lindsay lohan fell off the wall and onto his crotch while he slept last night

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe there should be a flashing light gif by every message that got its posted an sb.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

This fellow was so deeply in love with travelling in the summer that he got the word "SUN" tattooed on his penis. Normally, only the first and last letters were visible, although when he was aroused, the tattoo spelled out S-U-N. Now he's vacationing a resort in Montego Bay. One night, in the men's room, this fellow finds himself standing next to a tall Jamaican at the urinal. To his amazement, he notices that this man, too, has the letters S-U-N tattooed on his penis. "Excuse me," he says, "but I couldn't help noticing your tattoo. Do you love vacationing in the sunshine as much as I do?" "No way, mon, I used to post to ilxor.com. Mine reads, "SUGGEST BAN'"

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

I'm gonna wager here that Captain Lorax is over 40 SBs.

----> (libcrypt), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3251/2696731859_ef5517a5e5.jpg

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

there's no such thing as an objective measuring system!

uh, what about weight, temperature, etc. why a person should be banned is subjective, hence my comment about the dickometer.

besides, if the ppl on the low edge of the curve get banned, it's not as if the ppl on the edge+1 are going to suddenly get that much more annoying to compensate, right? yall are inventing these weird lord of the flies scenarios here

it's not that the ppl get more annoying, it's that the perception of their behavior changes. my air conditioner is loud in my office, it's annoying. I get it fixed. now I hear the fluorescent lights buzzing. annoying! get them fixed. now I hear my monitor whining, etc. none of these things got louder, but my perception changed. my underlying assumption, perhaps false, is that people who are super-sensitive to annoying stimulus are more likely to hit the sb button and will fall prey to this phenomenon.

but, whatever. even I'm getting bored of talking about this.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

can we give max a secret 25 board?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

it's not that the ppl get more annoying, it's that the perception of their behavior changes. my air conditioner is loud in my office, it's annoying. I get it fixed. now I hear the fluorescent lights buzzing. annoying! get them fixed. now I hear my monitor whining, etc. none of these things got louder, but my perception changed. my underlying assumption, perhaps false, is that people who are super-sensitive to annoying stimulus are more likely to hit the sb button and will fall prey to this phenomenon.

http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/badassbuddy_com-slowburner.gif

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

Antimony (pronounced /ænˈtɪməniː/ (UK) or /ˈæntɨmoʊni/ (US)) is a chemical element with the symbol Sb (Latin: stibium, meaning "mark") and atomic number 51

O_O

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

O_O

J0rdan S., Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.hobart.k12.in.us/ksms/PeriodicTable/About%20Graphics/antimony.jpg O_O

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)

5_1

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)

Antinomy (Greek αντι-, against, plus νομος, law) literally means the mutual incompatibility, real or apparent, of two laws.

The original board lawyer.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/51_sm.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

hahahahaha

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

woah with all these bros getting 20+ sbs, i kind of think maybe just limit the system to feebs.

ACTION BABY (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

new username ahoy

peace, respect, unity, and family (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)

to the corn field?

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)

i think there should be a new private board set up called Area 51 where only sb'd users can post

J0rdan S., Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.sartre.org/Theatre/NoExit.gif

J.B. "Judas" Priestley (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

i think there should be a new private board set up called Area 51 where only sb'd users can post

― J0rdan S., Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:09 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ha i was just thinking this too

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Are You Good At Anything? on board I Love Everything on Apr 25, 2003
not always, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread THE ALL NEW CRUSH TAPE THREAD. on board I Love Everything on Jul 12, 2003
thanks, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Ouch, My Car - This is the Thread Where You Tell Me About Your Car Accidents So I Don't Feel So Stupid on board I Love Everything on Aug 6, 2003
It's convertible, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Excelsior! The "Thinking" Thread Continues on board I Love Everything on Oct 2, 2003
SIMH, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say pt 29: 'Til the handle comes off! on board I Love Everything on Mar 26, 2005
'mornin sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread an orgasm thread on board I Love Everything on Apr 17, 2003
this ain't procreating, sug, this is fuckin...

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy Birthday, Vic! on board I Love Everything on Jul 10, 2003
aww good to hear, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Late Night Beer Chat on board I Love Everything on Aug 5, 2003
sweet dreams, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread The all-new-&-improved WHAT ARE YOU THINKING RIGHT THIS INSTANT thread! on board I Love Everything on Aug 13, 2003
have one for me, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread WHAT ARE YOU THINKING RIGHT THIS INSTANT -- with 50% more cleaning power! on board I Love Everything on Sep 2, 2003
Who says it hasn't, sug?

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy/Birthday David/Cozen! on board I Love Everything on Sep 6, 2003
Happy birthday, sug!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Wisdom teeth, getting rid of them, and quenching the fears of the procedure on board I Love Everything on Mar 11, 2004
Glad it went well, sug.

donut bitch (donut) wrote this on thread Luna on board I Love Everything on Nov 29, 2003
aw luna sug :(

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: pt. 9 (was 8, erroneously) on board I Love Everything on Feb 23, 2004
Works for me, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Countdown until weekend on board I Love Everything on Sep 10, 2004
not as sorry as I am, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt 33: Under More Balls Than a Midget Hooker on board I Love Everything on Jul 6, 2005
thanks sug - you're the best!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt 34: Baby, How'd We Ever Get This Way? on board I Love Everything on Jul 20, 2005
I am now, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy birthday, nabisco! on board I Love Everything on Aug 12, 2006
Happy belated, sug. xx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread It's late, I'm wide awake and bored, come talk to me! on board I Love Everything on Aug 3, 2003
I would, sug, but I'm not at home...

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Stake your claim: plots for your novel on board I Love Everything on Jul 30, 2003
No no, sug, it's you. Nice try, though.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Chicagoans! Meet me at the Hop Leaf! on board I Love Everything on Sep 3, 2003
Glad to see you back, sug

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Why are you Unhappy? on board I Love Everything on Jul 18, 2003
we love you too, sug - thank you.

luna wrote this on thread Happy Birthday, Mark C on board I Love Everything on Mar 16, 2007
Happy birthday, sug! Hope it's a perfect day. xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Rock Out on Your Birthday, Chaki on board I Love Everything on May 5, 2005
happy birthday, sug - hope it's a fantastic day! xox

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: on board I Love Everything on Jun 21, 2003
thanks sug, but I'd probably only barf.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Heavens! This is the thread where we who attended the July 4 FAP in NYC and related events make everyone else jealous of THE BRILLIANT TIME WE HAD! ;-) on board I Love Everything on Jul 7, 2003
well sug, if y'all are paying, I'd be happy to.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy Birthday, Vic! on board I Love Everything on Jul 9, 2003
Hope it's an absolutely fan-fucking-tastic day, sug!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Aug 4, 2003
He's in the few prayers I say, sug. xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Aug 4, 2003
Shoulda called me sug, I'd have come!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Hug Your Father Tonight on board I Love Everything on Jul 25, 2003
Much love to you and yours, sug. *hugs*

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread I just left my girlfriend on board I Love Everything on Aug 27, 2003
Aw sug, I'm sorry to hear it. *hugs*

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Bored at 26 on board I Love Everything on Sep 20, 2003
Happy birthday, sug - I hope it's fantastical.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread My cat has decided to become a Rastafari on board I Love Everything on Oct 16, 2003
sug, you need to get out more

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread How bout a hip hip hooray on the magical birthing day of that lovable dronerock mentalist CHRIS BARRUS? on board I Love Everything on Oct 30, 2003
Chris, hope it's a stellar day, sug! xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood... on board I Love Everything on Jan 14, 2004
I do have it covered, but thank you, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread MEN:SHOW US YOUR WIENERS on board I Love Everything on Mar 11, 2004
Yeah I thought it was too, sug. Wondertwin powers...

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: PART TEN, BITCHES on board I Love Everything on Mar 24, 2004
My ass (and heart) both accept. Thanks, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt 27: And So We're Told This is the Golden Age on board I Love Everything on Feb 4, 2005
Naw sug - I didn't mean that at all.

luna wrote this on thread CAT NEWS HERE!! on board I Love Everything on Sep 13, 2007

Aww, poor babycat. I'm sorry to hear it, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: on board I Love Everything on Jul 9, 2003
Thanks sug - I need all the help I can get.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread the NEW July 4 NYC FAP thread on board I Love Everything on May 28, 2003
I won't sug - I couldn't do it without you!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread LA FAP.. Labor Day weekend? on board I Love Everything on Jul 10, 2003
Hey sug, it's your wedding day, wear what makes you happy.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Jul 16, 2003
Thanks, sug!! I can't wait to hear 'em!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Methods of demanding fellatio on board I Love Everything on Jul 29, 2003
You don't want me to get you in a headlock, sug...

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread CHRIS P IS A YEAR OLDER on board I Love Everything on Aug 2, 2006
You can move now... happy birthday, sug. xx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Late Night Beer Chat on board I Love Everything on Aug 5, 2003
Of course not. Sometimes you gotta take one for the team, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Is masturbation the new black? (WARNING WARNING WARNING THIS IS SO NOT WORK SAFE) on board I Love Everything on Aug 13, 2003
Awww, Kenan, when's your birthday, sug? I'll hook you up.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (pt. 3) on board I Love Everything on Aug 26, 2003
Tell him, sug - don't take that shit.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 4) on board I Love Everything on Sep 22, 2003
Sug, if I could do it for you, I would.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread happy birthday hstencil!!! on board I Love Everything on Sep 28, 2003
Have a great day, sug! Hope it's a magical year. xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy Birthday Cinniblount! on board I Love Everything on Oct 1, 2003
Happy birthday, sug! Hope it's full of cinnamon-y goodness.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Waitresses calling you "sweetheart", "honey", "sugar", "yum butter", etc....C/D? on board I Love Everything on Mar 28, 2004
I call all people 'sug' all the time... is it endearing or awful? Shit.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This the Thread Where I Say Pt 19: Joey, I'm Not Angry Anymore on board I Love Everything on Sep 15, 2004
Does this make me a slut?

No sug, that's not what does it.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt. 21: You Have to Understand, I'm a Woman of Zest on board I Love Everything on Oct 22, 2004
Aw sug, you aren't being a bummer or wailing - let it out.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt 34: Baby, How'd We Ever Get This Way? on board I Love Everything on Jul 20, 2005
Pink! (Initially typed, btw, and 'Ponk') How are you, sug?

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Who's spoken for? on board I Love Everything on Apr 15, 2003
Yeah sug, I'm okay, thanks! It's funny how different things look in the sober light of day.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: on board I Love Everything on Jun 2, 2003
Well sug, I'm around if you need me (email or here or whatever or stuff, you know?)

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: on board I Love Everything on Jun 23, 2003
Not your fault, sug, I mean it is Teddy Pendergrass - I should have known.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say: on board I Love Everything on Jul 4, 2003
's cool, sug - the running man wouldn't have worked over the phone anyway. Have fun!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread THE ALL NEW CRUSH TAPE THREAD. on board I Love Everything on Jul 11, 2003
Chris, I got your cd just now and it rocks once again - thanks, sug!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Aaaarrrrr! It's the bootylicious Pirates of the Caribbean thread! on board I Love Everything on Jul 10, 2003
Sorry sug, it's your game, set, match. There's no escaping it once you put the ball into play.

You ARE that guy.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Aug 16, 2003
awww sug, I'm sorry *hugs*

I hope things get better soon.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread It's late, I'm wide awake and bored, come talk to me! on board I Love Everything on Jul 29, 2003
I'm ok sug - it's 3:17 am in the great state of California, and I should be asleep, but I can't. How're you?

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread It's late, I'm wide awake and bored, come talk to me! on board I Love Everything on Jul 29, 2003
I dunno sug - depends on where I move to! I don't know if I'm doing the NO thing right now...

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Is it OK to call girls chicks? on board I Love Everything on Aug 11, 2003
Sure, sug, if you want to. I think I'd make a kick-ass long distance girlfriend.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 4) on board I Love Everything on Oct 9, 2003
Thanks sug - I can use all the help I can get. I hate interviews.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 4) on board I Love Everything on Oct 23, 2003
Sug, we all do stuff like that at one point or another.. there are worse things.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread i have never... on board I Love Everything on Sep 22, 2003
Sug, you'd know if I did, 'cause I'd be picking your ass up.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread My boss is a crazy person on board I Love Everything on Oct 10, 2003
I thought MY bosses were insane. I'm sorry that happened, sug - what a maroon.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This Is The Thread Where I Say.......Part Seven! on board I Love Everything on Jan 9, 2004
Sug, I don't have anything good to say either, but luckily, I don't let that slow me down.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say ... Part VIII on board I Love Everything on Jan 13, 2004
Chris, you're beautiful, etc...

No really sug, I'm proud of you - stick it to the man!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt. 11: A New Hope on board I Love Everything on Mar 30, 2004
I hope it works, sug - and not just because then I'll know what to tell my doctor. xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt 13: Scared Stupid on board I Love Everything on May 9, 2004
no really, it's cool sug - I was out anyway at a bar and probably wouldn't have heard my phone ringin.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt. 15: Sight of You (Makes Me Feel Blue) on board I Love Everything on Jun 21, 2004
Jeannie, I'm here if you need me. Meanwhile, big hugs to you, sug. xxxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Happy Birthday, Huck. on board I Love Everything on Jun 8, 2004
Huckleberry Mann, I kiss you. Happy birthday, sug - hope this year is amaaaaaaaaazing. xoxoxo

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread teenybride! on board I Love Everything on Sep 9, 2004
Congratulations! Pictures! Stories!!!

May you have many, many wonderful years together, sug. xxx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread ILE triple birthday lez-up - HAPPY BIRTHDAY STEVEM! on board I Love Everything on May 14, 2004
You never fail to make me laugh, therefore you are the bee's knees. The birthday bee.

Happy birthday, sug. xx

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Where the heck is nickalicious? on board I Love Everything on Jun 29, 2003
...leading up to a week of debauchery, the likes of which hasn't been seen since Rome burned...

Glad to see you back, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Aug 11, 2003
Tep, again, I kiss you.

Nick.. I'd kiss you, but sug, you got puke breath.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (pt. 3) on board I Love Everything on Aug 27, 2003
Aw sug, I'm sorry. I know what that's like to a certain extent - and I miss those girls all the time.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Too Much Information RE: Growing Pains on board I Love Everything on Dec 16, 2003
Sug, that's probably just as well. Trust me when I tell you that you don't want to see inside my head right now.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread WOMEN: How many bras do you have? on board I Love Everything on May 14, 2003
I freely admit it, Ms. Laura - I have the biggest collection of lingerie of anyone I know. Sug, if Victoria's Secret had a diamond card, I'd have already worn off the writing.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Share your most banal conversations with the world! on board I Love Everything on Sep 25, 2003
Me: Hey sug, I'm staying home sick today.
K: Oh, are you okay?
Me: I think I have the flu.
K: Okay, I'll tell them. Bye!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Jul 30, 2003
You and me both, sug. I say 'nice bat turn, robin' a lot, too.. but mostly when I'm driving and people look at me funny.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread It's late, I'm wide awake and bored, come talk to me! on board I Love Everything on Aug 4, 2003
Lady, 'm really sorry for having to ask, b-b-but are you really going without sleep for a sixth day now ...?

Sleep is for suckers!!!

Sug, I never sleep.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Who on ILX is in your league? on board I Love Everything on Aug 6, 2003
at least that has the prospect of a single johnny depp punch drunk on rum

Sug, if I could have this, you can bet your ass I'd be happy with the world.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 4) on board I Love Everything on Oct 21, 2003
Not a whole helluva lot is happening really, sug. I went to SF this weekend with my best girlfriend, but it was... I dunno, a little weird. Not as much fun as last time, anyway, but hey, it was nice to be out of LA for a couple days!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread heaven and hell. on board I Love Everything on Jul 29, 2003
ooh baby do you know what love's worth?
$75/hr
plus tip

I dunno where you are, sug, but around here it's $150/hr, $500 for the whole night. $750 if you want the 'around the world' special.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread My wallet was stolen. on board I Love Everything on May 5, 2003
I had my purse stolen several years ago, and the most ridiculous thing I did was to run after the guy yelling, "hey, GIMME THAT!" as though he'd stop and say, "Oh I'm sorry, was this yours?"

Sorry to hear it, sug - hope you get it all squared away soon.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 2): on board I Love Everything on Aug 12, 2003
You really didn't miss so much at all, sug. I've got the pirate ship now, though, so if you want to sign on and be one of my crew, you have only to say the word. Word, yarr.

I'm sleepy. *SURPRISE*

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Methods of demanding fellatio on board I Love Everything on Jul 29, 2003
Nah, sug, I actually usually do end up in TX a couple times a year - albeit in Houston - because one of my best friends lives there... hell, no matter where I end up, I'll come to the EDT anyway, cause I ant to hang with you.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (pt. 3) on board I Love Everything on Sep 19, 2003
I'm just frustrated, sug. It seems there are certain people I know who either can't or won't stay out of my life - and the things they're saying are things they really know nothing whatsoever about.

Shit, I'm really not that interesting!!!!

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say ... Part VIII on board I Love Everything on Jan 26, 2004
Good, sug - you make valid and well thought out posts, and I have always liked that you stick up for yourself and what you believe in - even if people are shitty to you because of it. You are a valued and respected, not to mention needed member of this bitch, yanno.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread Where I Say Pt. 15: Sight of You (Makes Me Feel Blue) on board I Love Everything on Jun 3, 2004
Clearly she's got to talk to the bank - and then tell her father that her bank balance is none of his business, that you're both adults and dealing with your bills on your own, and what he's done is disrespectful and just fucking not on.

I'm sorry sug - what a pain in the ass.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread Methods of demanding cunnilingus on board I Love Everything on Jul 28, 2003
most guys just aren't good at it, though we are mostly too polite to tell them.

I really haven't found this to be true. Maybe I'm lucky or maybe y'all haven't been.

I have known people who wouldn't do it, or didn't want to anyway, so I said 'that's ok, sug, you don't and neither will I.' I'm all about teaching them if they want to learn; I look at it as a gift I give myself.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread got a question for ya, ladies on board I Love Everything on Aug 21, 2003
Sug, you have to let the t-shirts go until you snag some lucky bimbo, then ease them back in until you're your regular metaltastic self again. It won't be easy, but it just may work.

Failing that, buy a Jag - women who dig the 80s won't be able to resist sliding around on the hood a la Tawny Kitaen.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where I say (Pt. 4) on board I Love Everything on Sep 26, 2003
Does it really matter?

Pink, I think it must be something in the air - today's only just begun (in terms of the hour anyway) and I'm already in a piss poor mood. My sleeping pills aren't working, and I just feel bitchy.

I hope your day gets better, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread where I say... Part on board I Love Everything on Nov 12, 2003
Not a whole lot has been happening with me, sug. There are a few things, but they're the kind of things you want to be sure of first, you know? Don't count your chickens and all that...

Otherwise, it's 2:30 and I'm in a surprisingly good mood. This whole NaNoWriMo thing has done me good, as has being surrounded (though sometimes from 8000 miles away) by people I love and those who love me.

< /tweemo>

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the Thread where I say... Part on board I Love Everything on Nov 24, 2003
Aww Sarah, I'm so sorry.

I got woken up this morning by my best friend calling to say that her mother might have cancer... not my optimal morning.

Tep, I have the same attitude about snow - but you know, now that I don't have it, I miss it.

Pink, fingers crossed about the house, sug.

luna (luna.c) wrote this on thread This is the thread where you write the post everyone would expect you to write on board I Love Everything on Aug 9, 2003
I'm sad. And tired. Now happy. Oh, I like giving blowjobs, too. Sex! Oh, sad again. Wait, now happy. Yay you all are wonderful, the best friends ever! I'm not drunk yet, but I want to be. I'm bored. My car is wrecked! You go girl! Oh, I'm sad again. Hey sug, I'm here for you. BEST DAY EVER! Tamara and I.... Oh wait, I'm going surfing. Let me tell you about my underwear. I like sex toys. Oh, drama again. I hate my job. I'm moving! Drunk! I still can't sleep.

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:23 (sixteen years ago)

she bangin john redcorn on the side?

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:24 (sixteen years ago)

oops tepcorn

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:24 (sixteen years ago)

lolll

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)

hey mods can i have my SB count e-mailed to me too thanks

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

http://friedriceandbeans.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/13/suge_1.jpg

eman, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb was a malignant presence, good riddance and keep him away imo. i think a lot of the "hated" posters on here are totally dope folks who just like to bust on people a lot, but you can tell they're good people.

― pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:29 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i have 4 SBs, one of them may have been from myself

― pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:54 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i feel like this is total vindication of omar's theory, btw, i butt heads with dude from time to time but totally think he's an MVP poster and would never suggestban him.

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)

haha right after i posted that i got my e-mail -- i only have 4 too! i really thought i'd have more, everybody feel free to hit the button next time i act out.

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

omar is a "hated" poster?

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

didn't mean to imply that, no. but i mean he's not a super positive surmounter type either, nahmean?

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

nor am i, obviously...i have no idea how you got so many, max, i guess you hang out on a lot of combative threads/subboards i've never looked at?

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

okay, I'm curious too. Can I get an email please?

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

i think all of max and jho's sbs are joke sb's from each other.

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

this thread feels like the geeks all got the cheerleader's diary and are breathlessly looking for mentions of themselves in it. me too!

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

u can only sb a person once tho

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

the cheerleader mentioned me 25 times homie

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/38/Theres_No_Disgrace_Like_Home.jpg

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

oh lol i obviously understand nothing about this process. wtf, people who are sb'ing max?

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

back before i understood how it worked i would click to SB the same people constantly. ok, person. ok, tombot.

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

well now i want to know because if MAX has 25 i must be one of those 3 ppl nearin' the 50 yard line.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

i think a "post here when you suggestban someone" thread is long overdue but I'm assuming putting it on 77 would not be KIP?

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

i think tuomas, capt lorax and morbius are good guesses

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think we'd be having this discussion if either of the next two people with the highest SB counts got autobanned

― thereminimum chips (electricsound), Monday, November 10, 2008 9:04 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ assuming this referred to deez and gabb, rong

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

altho i thought posters got yellowcarded w/ a warning when they hit 40 so i guess they would know

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

i understand how the process works and i STILL sb shakey every other day

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

maybe i should start a thread "post here if u ever suggest banned me"

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

xp: http://images.paraorkut.com/img/pics/images/d/dare_to_dream-2724.png

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

i don't even really know who captain lorax is!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

you are missing the fuck out

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

he's a really awesome poster and if he got sb'd off ilx i would be ;_;

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

also who would suggest ban dr morbius, honestly now

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

i have sb'ed captain lorax, and probably will do so again

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

i think it's entirely possible that I killed gabbneb; i finally caved and sb'd him on that top chef thread cuz he was really bugging the shit out of me.

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

^not braggin

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

no shame, you are a national hero no matter what tuomas says

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

Hi guys! Saw cachça 51 listed above. Anyone tried it? How is it compared to Pitu or Leblon? I could go for an açai batida or a caipirinha right about now!!!

Let's 51 this motherfucker!

PappaWheelie V, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

unfortunately i cant find the thread where he talks about moving water molecules with brain power

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

Have you ever had a friend that always acts straight but suddenly one day he says he is gay?
Message Bookmarked

Does this happen? I have never known this to happen.

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Friday, December 5, 2008 5:01 PM (2 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yes.

― Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Friday, December 5, 2008 5:01 PM (2 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Multiple times, actually.

― Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Friday, December 5, 2008 5:02 PM (2 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

names!

― Dr Morbius, Friday, December 5, 2008

^^ A+

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

i wasn't really familiar w/lorax before but those are the best thread titles ever

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

that spiderman one is WOA

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

max i think you are looking for this:

What the bleep do we know? Down the rabbit hole. part 6

Exodus 14 VS 14 CAGE MATCH FITE (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

fave cpt lorax thread:

All The Girls I Like Are Lesbians!

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

people who have nothing better to do but make fun of you from a distance and laugh at houdini sex jokes and talk about easy lays c/d

― CaptainLorax, Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:48 PM (1 year ago)

this guy rules

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

here's my fav lorax thread ever

How is the rebel flag not a racist symbol?

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

For the record, I don't like girls that look like teenage boys because of gay/pedophile reasons. I think cuteness, a more slender figure, and short hair (when done right) can be attractive on a girl.

I would rather explain my preferences on chicks by posting pictures of all the different looks that appeal to me the most but I don not have any pictures.

-- CaptainLorax, Tuesday, April 15, 2008 5:47 AM Bookmark Link

am I the only one worried that china is going to take over USA?

I watched the finally of boston legal last night where Chinese business men tries to take over their law firm.
This morning I turn on the tv and the first person I see is Cao as the new head of the GOP, a Vietnamese man (Chinese smokescreen), who is the most unlikely GOP representative ever.

So yeah, I'm starting to get worried that Asia is taking over America and I wont get a job for another year because America is in shambles. Maybe the economic strain has finally taken a toll on me and I'm just blaming the Chinese. But damn man, I want a job, I have a degree in statistics from a great university... god damn.

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, December 9, 2008 4:06 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

*free* online sex personals - got any links?

― CaptainLorax, Monday, February 9, 2009 5:38 PM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

I guess my point is the same as it was in my political debate topic.
Why are so many people idiots??????????????????????? Why do people turn the blind-eye? Why does it keep going on? How can people be so idiotic (seriously)? If we can't figure a way to educate the people better than we are doomed! I'm thinking along the lines of America getting bombed actually. The reckoning has already passed and millions of people missed it. Heck, we havent done a single thing as a whole country to prevent global warming. The only thing we have done is talked about.

Tons of you already accept that fact that we are doomed.

The idiocracy is that a few people can save us. Can educate us. Can at least tell the message to others. That's all I'm doing. I'm telling the cold hard truth without being Jehova's witness.

― CaptainLorax, Thursday, September 6, 2007 12:22 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

d*mn... really makes u think

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

dude can be funny but also crepey and annoying, see this thread and the internet dating thread

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

am I the only one worried that china is going to take over USA?

I watched the finally of boston legal last night

i'm dying

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

lorax guy just thinking baout things

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 26 February 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

I know she supposedly has huntington's disease and all, but why does 13 have such low self-esteem? I mean I could probably get a date with her and might actually marry her if push came to shove (if she wasn't just a tv character). We could have mnage à trois the way they're supposed to be - and then I could make fun of her and she'd be like, oh lorax i have such low self-esteem, what can I do to make you feel better

― CaptainLorax, Friday, January 30, 2009 2:47 PM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

eh, maybe the global awakening in 2012-2013 will change your mind.
I mean do any of you believe any of that astrology stuff - people are similar to their sun sign descriptors....

― CaptainLorax, Monday, August 25, 2008 1:28 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

mook mook mook mook

― CaptainLorax, Monday, August 25, 2008 1:44 PM (6 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

btw i used to like this dude on a semi-ironic tip, the same way i "like" gabbneb, but at this point i cant help but genuinely admire & feel affection for his goofy ass

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

it's not the amount of girls that counts - it's the amount of cunnilingus received by me that means anything

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, January 6, 2009 7:43 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

i'd be interested to see my own total too if someone gets time. if i come back all against sb's then i guess you'll know why.

Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

nu-anthony e

mookieproof, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe Lorax is a lesbian? Women can be captains too, you know?

― Tuomas, Wednesday, January 7, 2009 2:36 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

dude is absolutely a sock, cmon

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

CaptainLorax wrote this on thread game-related lolz of some fashion on board I Love Games on Aug 2, 2008

oh man, my friend and his wife are gonna name their kids Bjork and Sebastian. Don't tell him I said this in here.

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

amazing! never ban tuomas, guys.

xpost yeah he's gotta be

xxp

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

new shoes

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

i don't know man, the edge of pathetic desperation is hard to fake.

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)

yeah he reminds me too much of dudes i went to high school with

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)

Thread has gone way off the rails -- is there a thread of lorax-lovin' y'all want to take it to? It would be nice to stick to SB-discussion here, even though that's played out too.

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)

I mean I could probably get a date with her and might actually marry her if push came to shove (if she wasn't just a tv character).

^this cannot possibly be for real

horseshoe, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

dude is absolutely a sock, cmon

this would make me even sadder than if lorax got sb'd.

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

yeah there is something 'i am being fucked with' about him

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know enough girls to have a crush archetype but I can imagine quite a few I would like
-a girl named elise that is sweet, outgoing, and has curly hair, a sexual being, etc..
-nerdy girl that laughs funny and is really cute but secretly half-way sinister
-a good-looking "book smart" girl with a tough shell and sweet mushy stuff inside
-a girl that makes sexual advantages on me and is not obese or really ugly
-an foreign girl with dark hair and is petite and beautiful

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:20 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)

-a girl that makes sexual advantages on me and is not obese or really ugly

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)

yeah see "some dude" is one of ilx's invaluable "short-fuse alexes" that deep down we all love and would never want to see go away (n/h)

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

an foreign girl with dark hair and is petite and beautiful

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

Should I lose weight

a classic

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

i hav sbd all the alexs

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:10 (sixteen years ago)

ahahahaaa never change homie

― and what, Tuesday, September 30, 2008 6:37 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:10 (sixteen years ago)

now, I'm willing to say How I Met Your Mother is the Friends of today.
BUT, and this is a big BUT - HIMYM is AWESOME while FRIENDS is PUTRID CRAP HANGING FROM A DEAD OBESE MAN'S DECREPIT TOENAIL.
The comparison is that it's a real life comedy sitcom about friends and sex (usually). The sex scenes in Friends we're all uncomfortable because all the characters we're hard to relate to since they acted out the lowest forms of life, personality, and humor. Meanwhile, I can watch How I Met My Mother with my family (which includes a little sister who started watching it around age 14 I believe) and not feel uncomfortable because the humor is class act and the sex is taken a little more seriously. Personally I just hated seeing Friends and their sexcapades just because I hated them so much and even I was maybe 15 at the time and just found it unrealistic and disturbing (because I hated the characters - and only sort of liked Joey Phoebee and maybe Channler.)

― ❤ⓛⓞⓥⓔ❤ (CaptainLorax), Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:38 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Trigga Happy Fraiser (Lamp), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

yeah there really is not 1 laid back Alex on this board, is there?

some dude, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

alex in mtl

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

posts about cassie

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

I could use a confidence boost.. you don't have to only mention my weight

― CaptainLorax, Monday, September 29, 2008 1:12 AM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

lorax and burt are like ali and frazier

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

lorax kind of otm re: himym/friends though

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

Joey Phoebee and maybe Channler

Lorax in NYC (some dude), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

I linked girls too this thread when I just now replied to a couple Women Seeking Men ads on Craigslist... because it was easier showing them my pics this way. Now they must think I'm the moron of the year... or hottest moron of the year, eh? winkwink

― CaptainLorax, Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:33 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

an amzing dream would be if tomboto had quit ilx to devote more time to his socks burt & lorax

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

OR GRADY

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:19 (sixteen years ago)

i feel liek thats the final step on the ilx journey: earnest music poster > stando ile person > sub bord mainstay > indecipherable one liners > sock master

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

while we have the gang all together here, who is WmC? i follow name changes really badly.

goole, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

grady was my sock btw - lost the login tho

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

i am at stage four. Perhaps i should craft my first sock.

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

plz to suggest a persona

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

asher roth stan

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

asher roth temple

peace, respect, unity, and family (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

btw forks u have abandon punctuation before mastering level 4

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

slock master

bobby dijindal (and what), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

i m really too in the bidness letter frame o mind to really quit punctuation but i will bear this in ming

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

Karl Malone is already taken, forks

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

duly noted. perhaps i should be jeff hornacek

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)

while we have the gang all together here, who is WmC? i follow name changes really badly.

the poster fka Rock Hardy

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Thursday, 26 February 2009 21:47 (sixteen years ago)

the poster fucka rock hardy

s1ocki, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

giggity giggity

WmC, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think we'd be having this discussion if either of the next two people with the highest SB counts got autobanned

― thereminimum chips (electricsound), Monday, November 10, 2008 9:04 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ assuming this referred to deez and gabb, rong

― max, Friday, 27 February 2009 07:45 (1 hour ago) Bookmark

nope, when i posted that gabb was not near the top and deez was already gone

juicy sweet are (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)

who was it

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:38 (sixteen years ago)

i don't remember exactly but it was probably lorax and stanton

maybe i'm still rong

w/ sax (electricsound), Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:41 (sixteen years ago)

u are because if the captain gets sbed i am going to email all the mods a virus

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:42 (sixteen years ago)

dont worry max we can use our worldwide ilc zombie computer spambot army to take down any modz

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:44 (sixteen years ago)

max just ftr, posts like that might explain yr suggest ban count

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

;-)

max, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure tomboto was giving max gabbnebs sbs all along think abt it

ice cr?m, Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:48 (sixteen years ago)

we should have 51 mods imo

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

electorlol college

cindy (goole), Thursday, 26 February 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

can someone email me my sb totals

i think theyre high bcuz sb's were instated at the height of jackoff sesh/chaki beef

deej da 5'9 (deej), Thursday, 26 February 2009 23:13 (sixteen years ago)

I'd like to know, too. Out of curiosity. And for the .xls.

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Thursday, 26 February 2009 23:24 (sixteen years ago)

deej & byankar, emails sent.

Pashmina, Friday, 27 February 2009 00:00 (sixteen years ago)

how about me

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:10 (sixteen years ago)

sent too.

Pashmina, Friday, 27 February 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)

can I see???

Curt1s SʨʧhɍȧǜʞƋʭƪƟƢƴťƦǂƽưʚʛƿɩens (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:37 (sixteen years ago)

thanks for letting me know how many ppl hate me, mods!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:40 (sixteen years ago)

Alright, I'd like to know also, please.

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:43 (sixteen years ago)

If ZS has more than zero then the suggest ban system is not working.

caek, Friday, 27 February 2009 00:46 (sixteen years ago)

I'm going to guess that I have 12.

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)

(would guess higher but I don't post as frequently as many others do)

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Friday, 27 February 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)

ok ok can i have mine? if you have a mo

s1ocki, Friday, 27 February 2009 01:25 (sixteen years ago)

i have 17

deej da 5'9 (deej), Friday, 27 February 2009 01:29 (sixteen years ago)

back before i understood how it worked i would click to SB the same people constantly.

I operate under the assumption that the system might "forget" (like how you can sometimes vote in polls more than once) and feel it is my duty to sb the same fucker every chance I get. It's like a pavlovian reaction to every post of theirs I see.

the innermost wee guy (onimo), Friday, 27 February 2009 01:30 (sixteen years ago)

Tuomas just bit the dust.

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Friday, 27 February 2009 02:57 (sixteen years ago)

that more or less sucks.

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Friday, 27 February 2009 02:57 (sixteen years ago)

:(

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 02:59 (sixteen years ago)

in spite of his retardation i hope tuomas makes it back here

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:01 (sixteen years ago)

whoa, not cool.

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:02 (sixteen years ago)

good going guys

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)

 

the new tuomas (libcrypt), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:10 (sixteen years ago)

вaсoи клав о́r сaиdy (rent), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)

shit man, just found this thread on accident while searching for a LOLS thread. heh, over the year I've been here I've gradually learned to post less idiotic shit. the rebel flag thread was my first post on ilx and my first time at ilxor. than I made a couple threads where I listed bands I like and tried to get people to suggest other bands I might like. they didn't go over very well.

oh and the new shoes thread is when I got barred from noise - I'm still barred.

but yeah, if half of you think that I'm funny then I guess I'm halfway funny and that's good enough for me :)

CaptainLorax, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)

you're also probably halfway to the corn field so I wouldn't go all sally field just yet

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:19 (sixteen years ago)

srsly though i think tuomos getting banned is a shame. he tends to get things moving on the slow days. tho obv lots of other people feel otherwise. in some ways he's almost reasonable to a fault, like he just keeps going until things make sense to him, which does gradually happen from time to time, its just that he is always coming from a different place and wont ever concede his position. then again maybe hes trolling. but i enjoy watching him make people go crazy.

вaсoи клав о́r сaиdy (rent), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:24 (sixteen years ago)

The underwear Tuomas pics were pretty fun, too.

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)

bummed about tuomas :(

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:28 (sixteen years ago)

i can't remember if i sb'd him ever

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:28 (sixteen years ago)

but i enjoy watching him make people go crazy

present tense so sad here.

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:28 (sixteen years ago)

I respect Tuomas in the same way I do Geir - he has a consistent position, and is often reasonable and ALWAYS polite, even in the face of extreme hostility and mockery. He doesn't deserve 90% of the shit that's thrown at him.

one art, please (Trayce), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)

if 51 people post that they miss tuomas can we get him back?

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:31 (sixteen years ago)

i sb'd myself once when I was really drinkin
btw, my friend who was gonna name his kid Bjork got in a divorce.. after like 7 years.
one of the cooler things he owns is an Bjork record hanging on his wall - she is like 10 years old. really rare album.

CaptainLorax, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:31 (sixteen years ago)

great story lorax

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas RIP

You have been an incorrigible bro.

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:37 (sixteen years ago)

i hope that when gabbneb and tuomas return they post pics of themselves on wdyll wearing bad disguises.

estela, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:38 (sixteen years ago)

can you please disable suggest ban now?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)

its pretty funny that tuomas hit 51 as a result of posting on this thread tho right

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)

o teh ironing

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)

anyway, plz cosign my moderator request thread, k thx bye

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)

This thread does not appear to exist. If you had it bookmarked, perhaps the thread has been moved to another board.

Return to Front Page

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:42 (sixteen years ago)

it's on i must protest

velko, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)

can you please disable suggest ban now?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

good luck usa

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

I wasn't protesting, I was making a request, but okay, whatever

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:45 (sixteen years ago)

it's a feature request not something mods can change

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:47 (sixteen years ago)

on a broad level, i feel really bad about tuomas, because he was a positive poster and was very polite, as trayce said. but the dude was fucking insufferable sometimes when he would go on about 77 or (lol irony) suggest bans or other meta stuff. so on a micro level, i dont feel bad about suggest banning him because he genuinely has no idea when to stfu.

basically SBs should be temporary

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 03:48 (sixteen years ago)

OK, it's a fair cop

xp to electricsound

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 03:48 (sixteen years ago)

even though I sb'd tuomas (not recently), I have regrets and want him back now.

also my inner 10 year old is cracking up at all the "SBDs" on this thread

Dan I., Friday, 27 February 2009 04:43 (sixteen years ago)

loooooooooooooooooool

i do like tuomas though, he's a funny mofo

eman, Friday, 27 February 2009 05:09 (sixteen years ago)

I would like for everyone who ever wondered why Tom spent so much of his tenure as moderator screaming at people to bookmark this thread.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 05:59 (sixteen years ago)

i don't understand why ILX actually VOTING to have a Tuomas removed is like a 5000 post thread of regrets and tears and outrage and freshman year discussions about what "democracy" REALLY means, but longtime valuable poster Catsupppp Dude is perma-banned by a sourpuss mod over a legitimately funny prank and no one gives a shit.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 27 February 2009 06:08 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe because in the long run JW mightve been SB'ed out anyway, I suspect? He's a much better example of disruptive to the whole board behaviour that merits a ban (script fuckery, image flooding, hassling ILXors off-board, etc).

one art, please (Trayce), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:10 (sixteen years ago)

And having said that I dont rly have any beef with him personally, but he's certainly done more that logic would call "damaging" than Tuomas ever has!

one art, please (Trayce), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:11 (sixteen years ago)

dude jon's "pranks" would've gotten more annoying as the increased in frequency and seriousness. it was probably best that that one was nipped at the jump imo

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:11 (sixteen years ago)

hey I was an apologist for jw for a long time, but dude actually hacked the site so it's tough to characterize his actions as benign. I never really thought he'd actually do any damage, but as a mod if you're responsible for keeping the site secure and running smoothly it's not really behavior you can indulge.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:13 (sixteen years ago)

and if you really think banning tuomas was "put to a vote" u crazy

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:18 (sixteen years ago)

uh

it was

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:18 (sixteen years ago)

we voted

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:18 (sixteen years ago)

51 times

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)

http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/b7/21/75b992c008a0c481d8a87010._AA300_.L.jpg

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:21 (sixteen years ago)

yeah.

it's like a system of government run like the TV show Survivor, but WE decided it, not a mod.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 27 February 2009 06:21 (sixteen years ago)

doesn't "vote" imply a majority?

also, what percentage of those sbs were lol ban tuomas, and how many people are now saying "wish I hadn't sb'd the guy"

and who's next (me, probably)

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:22 (sixteen years ago)

so big brother then

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:22 (sixteen years ago)

more liek biggest loser

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:23 (sixteen years ago)

nice guys finnish lolst

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 27 February 2009 06:26 (sixteen years ago)

^^ troof bomb

Layzingtron (PappaWheelie V), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:28 (sixteen years ago)

u guys i propose a rechristening of the truth bomb in honor of our fallen hero

the tuom bomb

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:45 (sixteen years ago)

tuomtron bomb

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:47 (sixteen years ago)

sock it tuo me

velko, Friday, 27 February 2009 06:47 (sixteen years ago)

tuom on to the break of dawn

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:48 (sixteen years ago)

kill tuo birds with one stuone

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:49 (sixteen years ago)

tuomaster

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:51 (sixteen years ago)

wait I don't even know what the hell that means

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:52 (sixteen years ago)

is it alright to do that in front of a baby?

Joe Biddden (The Reverend), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:53 (sixteen years ago)

there should certainly be some sort of statistical analysis run on suggest bans to determine a meaningful level of banworthiness. or not.

Curt1s SʨʧhɍȧǜʞƋʭƪƟƢƴťƦǂƽưʚʛƿɩens (Curt1s Stephens), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:56 (sixteen years ago)

it take tuo to tango

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 06:59 (sixteen years ago)

tuo to masto

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 07:02 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.mixunit.com/assets/stepbrothers_email-lrg.jpg
there must be tuo sides

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 07:05 (sixteen years ago)

tuo every stuory

w/ sax (electricsound), Friday, 27 February 2009 07:08 (sixteen years ago)

We need to estimate a Bayesian Banworthiness Criterion (BBC)

Dan I., Friday, 27 February 2009 07:09 (sixteen years ago)

i would just like to say that for once i am totally with the mods on this, today we saw that the system really works. i have nothing against Tuomas and hope he isn't gone permanently, but honestly the guy is exasperating and i would be totally fine with a few weeks or months without him.

Lorax in NYC (some dude), Friday, 27 February 2009 07:31 (sixteen years ago)

Surely someone has suggested an alternative where one can also cancel out suggest bans...y'know, making it like currency. 50sbs in debt? A month in internet prison. 50 anti-sbs? A month in the ilx hall-of-fame. This is probably difficult to code.

Someone Still Loves You Evan and Jaron (Tape Store), Friday, 27 February 2009 07:49 (sixteen years ago)

man gabnebbs kinda taking the ass-end of this huh

linh (jergins), Friday, 27 February 2009 08:05 (sixteen years ago)

up the ass end more like

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 08:48 (sixteen years ago)

I never thought I'd say this but I actually feel really bad about the 87 times I clicked suggest ban on Tuomas now :(

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 09:38 (sixteen years ago)

it's like, the guy bugged me sometimes and I guess I just let the red mist descend but jesus, if I realised what it would feel like to be responsible for this, I, I....

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 09:39 (sixteen years ago)

also, can mods please implement a "suggest medieval torture" feature in case he comes back

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 09:40 (sixteen years ago)

i don't understand why ILX actually VOTING to have a Tuomas removed is like a 5000 post thread of regrets and tears and outrage and freshman year discussions about what "democracy" REALLY means, but longtime valuable poster Catsupppp Dude is perma-banned by a sourpuss mod over a legitimately funny prank and no one gives a shit.

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, February 27, 2009 1:08 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

t-bombin

all that shit about 'oh he hacked the site a bloo bloo bloo' who gives a motherfukk - on this other board i'm on, they made one guy an admin because he kept hacking in and giving himself admin privs so they just said fuckit we cant stop him and everyone lol'd about it - ilx: pussfest 5000

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Friday, 27 February 2009 09:50 (sixteen years ago)

i don't even know what jw did and the site does suffer from his absence imo fwiw

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)

Um, hang on, I can't be bothered to read a 500 post thread, but on a more serious issue - erm, Tuomas is/was one of the main moderators on TMI...? Um, does the ban have to be sitewide, because we do actually need him on that board for moderation duties?

Sneaky Sneaky Prog Friend (Masonic Boom), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:05 (sixteen years ago)

oh man i can pepper the board with my retards-fuckin pics now

s1ocki kong country (cankles), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:09 (sixteen years ago)

Well, without Tuomas to... be a more moderate moderator, that leaves me as the only moderator in this time zone, and I'm trigger happy. So in short, don't try it.

Sneaky Sneaky Prog Friend (Masonic Boom), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:18 (sixteen years ago)

Um, hang on, I can't be bothered to read a 500 post thread, but on a more serious issue - erm, Tuomas is/was one of the main moderators on TMI...? Um, does the ban have to be sitewide, because we do actually need him on that board for moderation duties?

― Sneaky Sneaky Prog Friend (Masonic Boom), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:05 (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yeah, this is the key issue here everyone's overlooking.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)

And fwiw, now everyone's been sharing their SB totals with each other, I kinda feel that The System Works from where they've all been falling.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)

im amazed that jho and max have 25

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 10:23 (sixteen years ago)

all from each other and you two i suspect

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)

i sb the posters i really don't like, which is not really that many.

i think they should be temporary, which is another way of saying i come here partly to get in fights.

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 10:28 (sixteen years ago)

can I be emailed Dom's SB total pls?

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)

i want to know Geir's

which is another way of saying i come here partly to get in fights

i'm guessing you're on about 30 or so

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 12:37 (sixteen years ago)

youd be surprised

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 12:54 (sixteen years ago)

Unban tuomas, please.

Ed, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:22 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas fan club really needs to be better organised to be honest

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)

i don't really have the energy to organize anything at the moment -- i can barely organize my hair and makeup in the morning.

but i will say that i've always gotten good vibes from tuomas, no matter how annoying others may have found him. and i think it's a shame that he was banned because he was sticking up for someone, + whatever other reasons there may have been. if there's going to be a suggest ban feature, i think we have to be careful not to use it just because you don't like someone, or because someone irritates you. this seems like a really crappy, playground-model design for a discussion board that's supposed to be about some form of community, no matter how stupid and cheesy that sounds.

as someone who never said a harmful thing to me, i felt i owed it to the guy to speak up. now go ahead and sb me!

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:49 (sixteen years ago)

this seems like a really crappy, playground-model design for a discussion board that's supposed to be about some form of community, no matter how stupid and cheesy that sounds.

Also, it's fucking hilarious the idea that THIS is the playground model everyone's BAWWWing about, because it's SO less noble than the ILX-approved model of constantly calling legitimately good posters furrys and pedophiles until they're run off the site.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:56 (sixteen years ago)

lool

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

the ILX-approved model of constantly calling legitimately good posters furrys

tbf people were trying to back up their claims by providing links to the appropriate wiki entries

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)

Or the passages in the appropriate John Harris books on the history of Britpop detailing the families of 14-year-old Indian girls turning up at the Creation records offices with a litany of complaints.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:03 (sixteen years ago)

I remember the idea of an "ignore" function getting the megathread treatment some years back and our old pal Momus, long since permabanned, thinking it was just terrible - he was also very anti-banning in general. Being Catholic, my feeling on board policy is Let The Mods Mod, They Probably Know Best but an "ignore" function seems like a possible alternative; all its downsides are obvious enough (discussions that get hard to follow because you have somebody set on ignore; stuff gets copied and pasted anyway so it's not like the ignoree goes totally invisible) but it's less harsh.

I like Tuomas because he provids a far extreme in the field of "not being able to let an argument go" & I'm afraid I now represent the far edge of that personal failing, which, y'know, nobody wants to be THE WORST. But he can be extremely aggravating about this, no doubt. I think he makes an easy target for a lot of people, and I think people succumbing to urge to treat a guy like "you're the guy I make fun of no matter what you're actually saying" is pretty sad, and I wonder how many of the suggbans he racked up were a result of this. But I mean you gotta work your ass off to get banned by the suggest ban function, it's not actually that hard to leave a thread when you've notice that you're really pissing everybody off, and I mean, if a hot-tempered blowhard like me can see that much and manage to avoid getting banned, well, it reduces my sympathy for those to whom it happens, even though I suspect a fair number of suggest-ban clicks are kinda bullshit.

tl;dr whiney pretty otm up there

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:11 (sixteen years ago)

i think sometimes tuomas was annoying because talking with him could border on geir-like brickwall at times

but i liked dude in general & it sucks that hes gone -- im def in favor of sug'bs not being permabans

deej da 5'9 (deej), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)

personally would be interested to see a 'should this person be unbanned' poll on IMP whenever anyone goes over 50, and maybe if they get 51 unbans then back they come

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:16 (sixteen years ago)

i was wondering about the logistics of this

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)

you gotta work your ass off to get banned by the suggest ban function

― J0hn D., Friday, February 27, 2009 9:11 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

otm i bet theres only 80ish people who even ever use the sb link

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)

tbh Tuomas being unbanned because a few members of his fan club swan in here demanding the process be unfairly overturned would be a massive slap in the face to guys like me who've gone to to the trouble to register 15 sockpuppets and click suggest ban with all of them

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:19 (sixteen years ago)

forget forgive polling the banned or whatever - they should be forced to crawl back under a new more palatable identity - i mean if tuomas eases back on the doggedly clueless shtick then everyone will be pretty psyched and the sb basically worked right

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)

repeatedly describing people who think this is kinda bullshit & want to talk about it as members of the "fan club" seems at least as suggban-worthy as any of Tuomas's shenanigans tbh

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)

totally dude go for it feel the power good good

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:26 (sixteen years ago)

people just calling for an unban tho = when has this ever worked? it's not an effective way to try and add enough pressure to equate 51 SB's. i love polls btw.

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:27 (sixteen years ago)

repeatedly describing people who think this is kinda bullshit & want to talk about it as members of the "fan club" seems at least as suggban-worthy as any of Tuomas's shenanigans tbh

ah come on now did you not see the one where he suggested that flashmobbers weren't cunts?

really though that post was supposed to of been in a sort of lighthearted tone; I also only actually registered about six sockpuppets

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)

for the lol it brought me, i would have pressed a "deduct suggest ban" for jho for that last post if i could.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't even know MxPx was jhoshea so I retract my snark

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:29 (sixteen years ago)

I'm not :(

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)

haa

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

oh well then it's on

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

kiddin, hugglez

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

sorry, should have said ice cr?m

would also have pressed said non-existent button for J0hn. i'd be like one of them folks who top up other people's parking meters. and typically get beaten to a bloody pulp.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

ive registered my dislike for suggest bans before and it seems clear that the mod crew has no patience with this but i still want to say--suggest bans basically suck

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

i keep wondering what my officemates would think if they knew i was on some website going over which posters are this close to getting excommunicated from posting to the site FOREVER

...

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

every time I beat up a guy for plugging somebody else's parking meter, I feel a little bad about it

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:33 (sixteen years ago)

btw everyone max has 25 sbs - yr almost half way there!

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:34 (sixteen years ago)

joe if i get got im takin u with me

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

im already contemplating my new usrname

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

what we should do is create a secret "sin bin" board where only people who have more than 35 suggest bans can go, and anyone over 50 has mod powers

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

deducted "deduct suggest ban" from J0hn for the snark. he's right and i was wrong though.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/grimreaper.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)

hey would you guys with the changing clever usernames who're actually ppl I like get with the program and register as something that resembles yr old username, as an old fuckin dude with limited capacity for processing new information I would appreciate it

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)

also that wasn't snark that was just joaks! joaks!

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)

its spelled joeks dude

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)

btw everyone max has 25 sbs - yr almost half way there!

― ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:34 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Allah akSBar

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

joe if i get got im takin u with me

― max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:35 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^i meant to c+p this post so that ruined the gag.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

How do you like my new screen name?

J0hn D. (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/300px-Slim-pickens_riding-the-bomb.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:40 (sixteen years ago)

reinstated "deduct suggest ban". this getting confusing. def need a button.

speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:41 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/thestand.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

Whiney that screen name makes you look so dashing

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

if theres a lesson to be learned from mine and maxs high sb totals its that bord lawyering is a god way to get sbd

MPx4A (ice cr?m), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)

its spelled joeks dude

totally sb'd you for this

J0hn D., Friday, 27 February 2009 14:43 (sixteen years ago)

i like joaks!

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

26!

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/and_then_there_were_none.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't really sb u max you are the nicest guy and anybody who sb'd you is gonna get beat down by me if I catch them in my neighborhood

which to be fair ain't gonna happen

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

;-)

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:48 (sixteen years ago)

joaks noah was a shitty draft choice, sb'd the chicago bulls for that

deej da 5'9 (deej), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:49 (sixteen years ago)

omg deej huge lol

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:49 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/to_the_corn_field.png

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)

this whole thing could turn REALLY interesting by the end of the year

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)

can we at least change the link from "suggest ban" to "I wish you to the corn field"

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:51 (sixteen years ago)

Esp. if anybody from this point on ever SBs for lols and that person ever gets the 51-hammer. Get one dick control, shit has consequences, etc.

xpost

WmC, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:54 (sixteen years ago)

Bookmark Cornfield Permalink

MPx4A (ice cr?m), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

do SBs wear off after a certain time or are they 4 life

braveclub, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

They are permanent for that login.

WmC, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

theyre like tattoos

deej da 5'9 (deej), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

a tattooed tear for every ilxor you've shiv'd in a darkened thread

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)

Six hours late for non-joeks chat but, sockpuppets aside, wd lulzy/pile-on/vague annoyance bans be discouraged if sugbanning someone added to yr own SB total as well?

I know it's not really so clear-cut but some people talk like they're SBing everyone not on their gchat buddy list and some people like they're allergic to it existing, and since we are singing about how it is a marvellous tool of democracy it seems a shame for type 1 to overrule type 2.

(I do not expect this to happen, obviously - and sockpuppets make it almost useless, but then they make any automated voting flawed, and both voting and multiple logins are here to stay - but since we're discussing, like)

PS I'll miss Tuomas, who's gonna tell me about Finnish hip hop or Jammin' Unit/Air Liquide now?

a passing spacecadet, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)

But I mean you gotta work your ass off to get banned by the suggest ban function, it's not actually that hard to leave a thread when you've notice that you're really pissing everybody off, and I mean, if a hot-tempered blowhard like me can see that much and manage to avoid getting banned, well, it reduces my sympathy for those to whom it happens, even though I suspect a fair number of suggest-ban clicks are kinda bullshit.

this says it all, really. either Tuomas was ban cruisin' on purpose (not so much death by cop as trying to incite the whole village into stoning him) to be an anti-SB martyr or he really is as dumb as he sometimes (but not always) seemed and could probably use this learning experience.

btw i would just like to say that 51 was a really good threshold, whoever came up with that idea way back when. this happening just 2 or 3 times over several months seems to indicate that it's effective enough to work but not so trigger happy that it happens too often.

Mr. Debonair Touch Himself (some dude), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)

lol if all sbans could show up in admin log

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

They are permanent for that login.

― WmC, Friday, February 27, 2009 9:57 AM (2 minutes ago)

i seem to remember tombot saying something about erasing everyone's after a certain amount of time? if not automatically then manually

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

I'm only half way down this enormous thread but for the sake of historical documentation I'd like to point out that Max was the lucky recipient of the first ever ILX Suggest Ban. No it wasn't from me.

David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

o who did it plzzzzz

MPx4A (ice cr?m), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

maybe it was me because dude was besmirching this sceptred isle and it's precious 'nuum

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

i think it was pleasant plains

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.maxpower.ca/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/maxpower_home.jpg

J0hn D. (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

pp did the first sb?? he was telling me last night how he hates the sb system. pish. WHATEVER

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

now sbs are tearing marriages apart

WHEN WILL THE MADNESS END

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

ya there was some thread where pp was like "whats a suggest ban" and i was like "i dunno" and he was like "i just did it to you"--it was a sort of cain and abel thing

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

curiosity killed the max

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

Ban 3:16

eman, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

killfile begat sugban, who begat lolsugban

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

I wonder if dan would get mad if we made an sb deathpool

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

^ A+ idea

eman, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

gambling's def the way to make this interesting

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

Dunno who did it Max, I just remember looking at the page and your name was the first to pop up. I just assumed it was Gr80 tbh.

David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)

the proof:

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=77&threadid=64056

quadratrillionaire (sunny successor), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

i regret ever saying this:

should be a list thread

― whatever the current LOL zing terminology is (max), Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:17 PM (5 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

deeznuts
captainlorax
― whatever the current LOL zing terminology is (max), Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:17 PM (5 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

sonofabitch, you killed deeznuts

bnw, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

ANTIMONY NOW!

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

I wonder if dan would get mad if we made an sb deathpool

― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, February 27, 2009 10:38 AM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark

guess I know the answer to this question

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

i.e. what's a yellowcard?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

The question does beg to be asked though, with the unravelling of the sb totals, are the desires of the mods of this site massively out of step with the desires of the site's userbase?

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)

yeah ppl were really trying to propose serious rules about the serious art of zinging deej

― you down with challo.p.p.? (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:49 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i just sug banned you i hope it was 50

― you down with challo.p.p.? (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:50 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

But what about the desires of the lurking massive? Do they tune in for the pile-ons or to keep up to date with news on shitty Canadian indie bands?

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

nah, everything's cool

xp

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)

deeznuts on fire in the suggest ban thread.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)

ok please just send me my number too i'm jealous of everyone else thx

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)

i'm kinda hoping this is some sort of hilarious sociological experiment mod prank whereby at the end of the month the "suggest ban: who voted where?" results are publicised

― J4gger Dynamic Pentangle (Just got offed), Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:32 PM (5 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bobby dijindal (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

are the desires of the mods of this site massively out of step with the desires of the site's userbase?

but first how do you go about determining desires of the site's userbase ft. hundreds of regular posters, rather than just a vocal minority of around 51 ppl

O Supermanchiros (blueski), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)

Also why can't a woman be more like a man?

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)

ok username has me in fits

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

The question does beg to be asked though, with the unravelling of the sb totals, are the desires of the mods of this site massively out of step with the desires of the site's userbase?

If they were that out of step you'd have been permabanned by now.

David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

Multiple times.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

wait that doesn't make sense

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

ask chaki

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

actually (funny story) chakis username is still accumulating suggest bans even though he was banned before they even started. 100% true story.

freezing fog its whats for breakfast (jjjusten), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

looking forward to m1ckey being 51'd any second now then

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)

i have not yet observed any PEW suggest bans

freezing fog its whats for breakfast (jjjusten), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

I think I SB'd his last sock appearance, unless it was a sock pretending to be a PEW sock. Sometimes you have to SB first and ask questions later.

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

lol how many sbs chakis got

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

actually (funny story) chakis username is still accumulating suggest bans even though he was banned before they even started. 100% true story.

― freezing fog its whats for breakfast (jjjusten), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:48 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Probably a jay blanchard socko.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)

If we can't build an electrified fence we can have electrified sbs.

Eerie, Indierocker (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ chaki getting sb'd from beyond the grave

john you should publish the sb ranking of club 51 members

it's like how many times people kept stabbing the corpse after it stopped moving

the apoplexy index

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

sometimes you have to make sure its dead

bnw, Friday, 27 February 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

Everyone should SB Nude Spock.

Roque Santa Gold (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)

Sometimes you have to SB first and ask questions later.

thread continues to deliver the lols

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

ILSB

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)

Everyone should SB Nude Spock

http://www.snapstream.com/images/community/hydra/Hydra.bmp

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y176/edwardiii/tribbles.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)

how many does gr8080 have

eman, Friday, 27 February 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)

L-R: Tribble, Tribble, Tribble, Patrin, Tribble

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

ahahahahahaha

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

need a button for suggest http://tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:eA8yWMLgANWJYM:http://991.com/newgallery/Eminem-Stan-172378.jpg

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:38 (sixteen years ago)

You a fan, a phony, a fake, a pussy, a S'ban

eman, Friday, 27 February 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

People in this world are too kind.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, March 6, 2003 6:55 AM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 27 February 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

is there a place where you can see how many sug bans you have?

The Notorious B.Y.O.B. (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

Earnest post from dude who has not read entire thread:

I hadn't really given much thought to the whole Suggest Ban system, given that I'd never noticed it in action, but this seems really wrong to me, that someone like Gabbneb could wind up banned not for doing anything particularly wrong, but just because a lot of people are annoyed by his style/opinions -- kind of banned as a form of picking-on, really. (Maybe I'm missing wherever it is that the guy is particularly abrasive, but he's always struck me as just a person with opinions, who is roughly as crotchety/argumentative about them as a dozen other people on the board...)

Haha now I also worry that every time someone says "LOL I just suggest banned you" because you voted for the wrong single in an ILM poll, maybe they really did click it, and you're eventually going to wind up permabanned over something like thinking Dr. Hook had the best #1 single in the Irish charts from 1972

nabisco, Friday, 27 February 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

Wrong. Thin Lizzy with "Whisky in the Jar". How's that SB feel?

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

btw i would just like to say that 51 was a really good threshold, whoever came up with that idea way back when. this happening just 2 or 3 times over several months seems to indicate that it's effective enough to work but not so trigger happy that it happens too often.

It's only happened 2 or 3 times over several months because it takes several months to reach the magic number of 51. And since your SB total is never reset, more and more people are going to be banned as time goes on. It would make more sense to me to have SBs accumulate constantly but only use the last 180 days (or whatever period seems best) for permanent banning purposes. So at the end of Feb. 27, for example, your SBs from Aug. 31 would be eliminated; at the end of Feb. 28, your SBs from Sep. 1 would be eliminated; and so on. Of course, I have no idea if that sort of thing could be implemented, but it seems like a better system than the current model.

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

when does the sb fiscal year begin?

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

im all for everyone from ilx eventually getting banned btw

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

if an asshole like me can only have 30 and change theres no excuse

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

but this seems really wrong to me, that someone like Gabbneb could wind up banned not for doing anything particularly wrong, but just because a lot of people are annoyed by his style/opinions

Isn't this sort of the point of SB, though? If someone does something clearly wrong, then the mods can ban him outright. SB is to allow the rest of us to ban people who get on our nerves over an extended period of time. (For better or for worse, of course. I'm kind of ambivalent about SBs in the first place.)

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb had it coming

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

seriously i dont think the gab-defenders here saw how many rap threads he shitted up or his weird, hostile boasts (mostly on 77) about his "heigl-lohan girlfriend" we're all jealous of - should be be a photo of kd lang next to "bancruisin" in encyclopedia ilxannica

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

otm

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

or his tourist advice on cities that he's been to once or perhaps never been to at all

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

hmmm i didn't think gabbneb was that bad. kind of a douche but i always douches have some unintentional value, like the heigl-lohan stuff was geniune awesome memebait and lolz.

was he the one who was going to wake up with a small boobed girlfriend in a mansion on the beach or something, that was funny.

but i'm continuously amazed by the fact that i spend like a zillion hours on this board for like 5 years and still don't understand who/why has personal beef w/who.

The Notorious B.Y.O.B. (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

also note in the past actual non-democratic mod bans have largely tilted towards the will of the people when punishing banworthy shit - notice how jay blanchard and riaa-mickey got banned for shit we've excused from more lovable racists like cankles

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

cankles is don rickles, jay blanchard was michael richards

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb also said some kinda hostile creepy shit to some other nyc ilxors iirc

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

he ruined allys bbq

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

the USA, Israel, and national interest

cindy (goole), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

well, it's a blurry line between a democratic effort to exile miscreants and a small group picking on someone they just don't like much. this place is really not earnest enough for any kind of awareness campaign about responsible use of the suggest-ban function, but it'd suck if people used it as a "LOL you annoy me right now" button and we all wound up offing one another

I kinda want counts on who suggests the bans!

gabbneb also said some kinda hostile creepy shit to some other nyc ilxors iirc

yeah, maybe I just miss all this stuff -- I ran into him and a friend at a show a couple weeks ago, and still do not find anything creepy or abnormal about him.

xpost - oh damn, I missed the BBQ too! do I need to get out more or look at more threads? make up your mind, gabbneb-banners

nabisco, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

xxactly

guess what, being an unpopular dick makes you more likely to taste mod, democratic bans just cut out the middle man

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

gabnebbanners

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

was he wearing a fish-hat xp

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

ruining a BBQ is a crime against human decency i will give you that.

The Notorious B.Y.O.B. (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

to me gabbnebs creepiness was always sort of hilarious and endearing

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

jews did 9/11

peace

― cankles, Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:53 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark

classic post

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb was really annoying and i don't think anyone misses him aside from max in this ironic poster stage

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

bbq sounds so good now, with some good music and sun

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_FfetiF7C9vo/R65XnaRUOzI/AAAAAAAAET8/KUtc6TkU34c/S760/Lenny+Bruce.JPG

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

cankles totally joking w/that stuff tho no - born in brookline mass prob a jew himself

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)

haha solution: button for "suggest non-ban," pictograph next to poster name representing popularity (red=danger, green=A+ poster!), amazon-style reviews on user profiles

and then we will be fully gawkerized

(xpost - like I said, I never minded gabbneb, I'm sad to see he was banned -- maybe I just looked at the right threads, but I have no serious complaint with the guy)

nabisco, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

if he had been banned prior to the election i think he would have had more defenders -- he was a good politix rss feed

deej da 5'9 (deej), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

well he never would've been 51 before the election, once he wasn't posting about politics he kind of lost his way and resorted to sub-trolling

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

ruining a BBQ is a crime against human decency i will give you that.

― The Notorious B.Y.O.B. (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:05 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

He probably thought people there were just fronting with that OMG RIBS thing.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I kind of miss Gabbneb, too. He was definitely annoying at times, but a lot of times it was for reasons that were so weird and left-field that I couldn't actually get worked up about it, like are you seriously going to argue with me over multiple paragraphs based on your contention that broccoli is a well-loved vegetable?

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

:)

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

("miss" = am sad that he was banned. I don't actually miss him yet.)

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

― Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, February 27, 2009 2:11 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

fyi he didnt say "ruining a bbw"

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)

gabbneb was really annoying and i don't think anyone misses him aside from max in this ironic poster stage

― the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, February 27, 2009 2:06 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

seriously tho i dont think any other posters besides the good captain have given me as many lols as gabbneb did last year--the girlfriend stuff, the blended haircut, etc. he was so ridic it was impossible to let him get to u

max, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:21 (sixteen years ago)

fyi he didnt say "ruining a bbw"

Clean hit

Helsinki Is Other People (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

fyi he didnt say "ruining a bbw"

holy shit, e.

Pashmina, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

wow i just searched "blended haircut" and that is some amazing stuff. someone at least needs to take gabb's quasi-douche rich guy mantle and carry it forward.

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

morbz is intentionally funnier/queenier and posts like "ta-TA!" or primaries thread nicknames are all real entertaining but im gonna have to put in a vote for gabb here bcz i cant really think of anyone else i know like him and end up thinking about weird aspects of him more than i should probably admit - like ok just today on the steve martin thread finding out that he only likes "king tut" for its "musical aspects" or the two coasts/blended haircut zing or his bizarro frumpy taste in girls theres just so much baffling stuff there

― and what, Thursday, February 5, 2009 3:41 PM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^real talk

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

it was not my bbq btw, i never would've invited him >:[

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

I kinda want counts on who suggests the bans!

read this as I kinda want a cousin who suggests the bans!

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

...

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)

hm

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

pretty weak post hoos.

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)

reaching for the sug ban button...

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)

heres some info on a cousin who suggests the bans, big hoos - me, of you, just now

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

lol j/k i could never do that to hoos

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

I like the idea of the sb being used for quality control purposes now

that wasn't up to your usual standard, hoos. you know there ain't no half steppin allowed KABLOW

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

i look forward to the day when it devolves into "tits or sb" personally

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)

I don't really know anything about gannbeb but I suggest banned him for posting gay porn on a thread I opened at work

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

thx cuz

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

"tits or sb"

what are the results of clicking this link

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)

besides o_O

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)

yeah TBF both gabb and tuomas managed to rack up a lot of SB votes dude to some extremely o_O linking decisions, so i think the "mean bullying" explanation is leaving out some significant details. xpost

freezing fog its whats for breakfast (jjjusten), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

hey jj are you watching me right now

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

tell me what color shirt I'm wearing

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

what the hell are you talking about

freezing fog its whats for breakfast (jjjusten), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

also fwiw I think there is a healthy side order of grudging respect for Tuomas' exemplary wind-up merchant skills, it's like wrestling fans booing the heel, but there's no point if sooner or later he doesn't get bludgeoned into the canvas and lose the belt

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

You Have Been Yellow Carded By a Moderator: Just so you know, you're being watched.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)

redshirt

linh (jergins), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think ilx has gone downhill bcz people have been banned

I think it has gone downhill for other reasons

I think more people should be banned!!!!

― the pinefox, Sunday, May 18, 2008 6:51 PM (9 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)

more like the pinebox amirite

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)

pinefox is basically tuomas w/o the bord lawyering

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

and more anti-semitism

throw some sb's (Lamp), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

---: I already e-mailed ----, but in the event he's out today, the Starbucks downstairs from my office was held up at gunpoint this morning, around 8 a.m.

36th and Madison; not a high-crime area.

Any interest?
!!!!
GABBNEB'S POST-BAN RAGE
me: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

sendin jews to the ban camps

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

and more anti-semitism

― throw some sb's (Lamp), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:26 (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

He's pretty anti-black racist as well, although he does hate jews more yeah.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)

fyi he didnt say "ruining a bbw"

― 'lop chalpagne (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:19 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^was gonna get all Country Matters: Attorney at Large over this, but I googled an ex's screenname and this came up:

http://plumpr.blogspot.com/

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

Contains tits and double chins, fyi.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

Attorney at Large

too easy

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

yr rickroll bait laying skills need work

xp

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

I'm confused as to why me and lamp have just had our posts deleted and a "stop slandering other posters" yellowcard installed? Pinefox is the guy who told a whole thread to stop using the term "dis ting" because we were "white", remember?

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

No, I don't remember. If you have a complaint about another poster, there's a forum for it, but you don't get to make blanket "so-and-so is a racist" statements about other posters completely divorced from context.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

And here's Pinefox on this weblink: http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=4670678808

the link: I don't get it. And I don't like the look of that page or the culture that it seems to represent.

― the pinefox, Thursday, 7 August 2008 15:38 (6 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, I don't wanna turn this into a separate discussion, but it seems weird that ILx is now a place where you can call Asians "pakis", but you can't call guys out for arguing that white people should talk in a specific way.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

maybe he means british culture

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

I now have had twice as many yellow cards in my ilx existence has I have suggest bans, btw.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

maybe he means british culture

― gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:46 (18 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Pinefox is as British as being sodomised while eating afternoon tea.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

yellowcarded for slandering l0u1s jagg3r

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

I was about to say I thought they liked that

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

This may be a foreign concept to you but not everyone is going to see something that evokes gang imagery as something that is awesome entertainment. This doesn't actually make them racists.

Also, ILX is not a place where you can call Asians "pakis" and if you sincerely think it is, you are either a total moron or you have no grasp of the English language.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

it's been a banner day for yellowcards

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

Also, ILX is not a place where you can call Asians "pakis" and if you sincerely think it is, you are either a total moron or you have no grasp of the English language.

― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:49 (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Did JimmyTheMod get a yellowcard then?

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, I don't want to be Che Sbanner, but sometimes it feels like mods are targetting dudes talking bullshit in meta threads harder than people who are actively, y'know, make the site worse.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

OSCARS 2009

why r this mexicans dancing behind that paki dude?

― JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:57 PM (5 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?showall=true&boardid=77&threadid=165&bookmarkedmessageid=146305

(6:13:43 PM) Heave Ho: If half a paki does that to her, imagine what a full paki could do

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

ewwww

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

You haven't been banned, have you? Count your blessings and move on.

Jimmy the Mod didn't get a yellow card for that because, to my knowledge, no one was following the thread where he said that. I probably would not have given him one had I seen it at the time, largely because his online persona is very similar to cankles' and he generally gets more leeway with stuff like that; had an uproar actually come about from that, moderator action would have been taken (even cankles has been temp-banned/moderated).

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

do we need a truth and reconciliation commission

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread are crushes awesome or what? on board I Love Everything on Mar 12, 2007
lol tough break nigga!

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread Clint Eastwood on board I Love Everything on Jun 6, 2008

shame on a nigga who try to run game on a nigga

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread [Jon] ILX will require a donation to register an account after June 2007 on board I Love Everything on Feb 28, 2007
nigga u teh crazy one

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread How do I become a film producer? on board I Love Everything on Jun 15, 2008

tough break, nigga

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread what's the big deal? on board I Love Baseball on May 25, 2008

it's coz nigga's crazy, innit? :-/

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved wrote this on thread a film entitled "21", that is, a cinematic adaptation of Bringing Down The House starring Kevin Spacey on board I Love Everything on Mar 29, 2008

lol my first thought when I saw this was coming out was "yo that nigga was ASIAN not some white ass dude"

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved) wrote this on thread this facial expression on board I Love Everything on Dec 10, 2008

tough break nigga

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved) wrote this on thread Finding a new way to choke: The 2009 New York Mets on board I Love Baseball on Dec 14, 2008

NIGGA U HAS TEH PHILLIES IN ALL YOUR DIVISIONS U_U

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved) wrote this on thread WHO WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT on board I Love Everything on Jan 2, 2009

darth vader why because NIGGA CAN THROW PEOPLE WITHOUT TOUCHING THEM AND CHOKE THEM WITHOUT TOUCHING THEM THAT IS SOME GANGSTA SHIT

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

Jimmy the Mod didn't get a yellow card for that because, to my knowledge, no one was following the thread where he said that. I probably would not have given him one had I seen it at the time, largely because his online persona is very similar to cankles' and he generally gets more leeway with stuff like that; had an uproar actually come about from that, moderator action would have been taken (even cankles has been temp-banned/moderated).

― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, February 27, 2009 3:56 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

there were like 100 posts on o_O about it

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

see, "that paki" would be offensive. "that paki dude" on the other hand, well, he's a "dude", so the "paki" becomes like a term of endearment

hope I've cleared things up

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)

dude if you're really bugged by it you two could just come to the mod board and point it out when you see it instead of just search & destroying later on...? i don't get that at all. i mean you guys seem to expect that dan and john and whomever are just literally reading every single thread and combing thru it for violations when it would just be easier to complain about a dude.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)

modest jimmy

velko, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)

I can't parse that guy's fascination with the magic word, though

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

No, we need Dom to recognize that his contentious history on the board, much like Calum's, is working against him, regardless of whether it's fair or not, and that while the mods strive to treat everyone equally, they will not always succeed and it really sucks when a large portion of the inequality comes down on you because you've been a contentious dick known for doing libellous shit to people on and off board. That's the reality of your situation and it is something you most certainly helped create; no one woke up and decided they were going to arbitrarily start picking on you.

xp: The last time I looked, o_O wasn't a moderation thread. Nice try, though. (Ally OTM) Also, having met JtM in real life, I know what he is doing in terms of tone/persona. If you actually have a problem with him, you could, oh I don't know, TELL THE MODERATORS instead of being passive-aggressive about it.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

you've been a contentious dick known for doing libellous shit to people on and off board

It's my tone/persona, don't worry.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

i'm seriously not trying to board lawyer/save a ho or anything here -- i mean when he starts up on the "rape is a hilarious joke and i'm going to say it 94/7" on ilnfl tip i delete his posts and tell him to take it to deadspin and he stops, so it's just like, dudes, say something, directly to the person buggin you, or email dan or john directly and ask them to delete it. it truly works. except if that person is gabbneb who was incorrigible.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

Jimmy the Mod's antics don't have people from other websites or industry people writing formal complaints to ILX moderators.

This is a lot of complaining over a yellow card; if you just want to be banned so we can all put this out of our misery, say so.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

No, I don't. Only five ILX posters other than you do anyway, so it'd be a pretty unpopular decision.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)

"Jimmy the Mod's antics don't have people from other websites or industry people writing formal complaints to ILX moderators."

this makes them scarcely antics at all imo

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

so mods are prizing folks theyve met in real life because they know their "tone" and threatening to ban other ilxors over a racism complaint, got it

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

Yes. Life sucks, doesn't it?

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

ADMIN: This is not a democracy

If you guys want to be nu-Calums, please be my guest.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

are you seriously going to argue with me over multiple paragraphs based on your contention that broccoli is a well-loved vegetable?

OMG, can we have this argument? I mean, WTF, as greeny vegetables go, broccoli is pretty mainstream

nabisco, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

It's kinda odd to post "This is not a democracy" on a thread about how you're not going to stop us being able to vote for which posters we want banned.

xp

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

ADMIN: This is not a democracy

If you guys want to be nu-Calums, please be my guest.

― Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, February 27, 2009 4:12 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

jeez dad

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:14 (sixteen years ago)

this is my favorite metathread in the history of metathreads I hope it never gets locked

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)

fwiw i've honestly thought some of pinefox's posts have been anti-semetic or at least wierdly tone-deaf like the thread where he goes on about how, y'know the jews really DO control the media and inrernation financial but those jews are not super-jewy so its okay.

yellow card is cool but i sincerly wasnt just being a dick

throw some sb's (Lamp), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

Plausible, to me:

-- John F Kennedy was murdered by the Mob/Expat Cubans/CIA etc -- surely this is quite mainstream, not a bonkers belief at all? In fact I'll vote for it here.

-- Jews control Hollywood and the worldwide financial system -- well, there are two different claims here. In fact Hollywood in its early days certainly did contain a proportion of rich and powerful Jews, possibly because they were fleeing anti-semitism elsewhere (in America as well as the rest of the world). It probably still does. It would probably be true to say that some people of Jewish descent do indeed wield significant power and influence in Hollywood. I don't see any reason, though, to think that they pursue a 'Jewish agenda' in any way, in their film-making. They are probably to be distinguished from the Israel Lobby that Mears and Walsheimer have described (is that just a conspiracy theory? I don't think so: I think it's true).

It is also true that some Jewish people have exercised significant influence on finance, and have been involved in or owned some of the richest corporations in the world, in the last century at least. I'm not sure that this should be a pejorative claim.

-- Scientologists control Hollywood (and are working on the financial system) -- Scientologists probably DO want to control Hollywood, and probably are trying to work on the financial system, though I imagine their success is limited. Certainly it would seem that there are more powerful and influential Scientologists in Hollywood than elsewhere. Various significant actors are Scientologists, whereas I have never met one in real life.

-- Pope John Paul I was murdered by the Mafia/CIA etc -- don't know much about this, but from the little I do know I think it could be true

-- Dr David Kelly was murdered by MI5/British government -- I don't particularly think that this happened, but it was a very murky affair and this might have happened; though I don't really understand the motives involved.

― the pinefox, Thursday, August 28, 2008 6:33 AM (5 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

throw some sb's (Lamp), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:19 (sixteen years ago)

I don't particularly think that this happened, but it was a very murky affair and this might have happened; though I don't really understand the motives involved.

rip tuomas

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:20 (sixteen years ago)

this'll look like ass-kissing, which it isn't, but I don't really give a shit: Dan, your general awesomeness and levelheadedness is an example to us all & I'm going to buy you a goddamn beer next time I'm in your neighborhood. Two beers. Three. Three beers, and nachos. That is how much I appreciate you being a guy with his head on his shoulders.

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

There is nothing anti-Semitic about Pinefox's post there, sorry dudes.

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

there's really nothing like broccoli in thai food

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

the way the flavor clings to all the little sprouts!

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

again with the nachos

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, not politically correct? Sure. But if that's your smoking gun on the guy's anti-Semitism, uh.

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

this'll look like ass-kissing, which it isn't, but I don't really give a shit: Dan, your general awesomeness and levelheadedness is an example to us all & I'm going to buy you a goddamn beer next time I'm in your neighborhood. Two beers. Three. Three beers, and nachos. That is how much I appreciate you being a guy with his head on his shoulders.

― Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Friday, February 27, 2009 4:21 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

drown u in beers

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)

you're right j0hn that does look like ass-kissing

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)

xpost drown u in nachos

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)

lool it wasnt whiney aahhhhhhhh

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

Lamp: I accept that explanation and am not surprised to read it; just, you know, think about it a little bit before throwing context-free accusations out there. (that's why I went "yellow card" and not "temp ban"; obv something spurred that statement but throwing it out there with no evidence is not a good idea, particularly when your evidence points more towards "confused" than "anti-Semitic")

JD: I don't consider myself "level-headed"; I just have a job to do. Still totally taking yr beer tho

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

should probably find a way to change that to a mt goats zing

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

i think i might have some postpartem depression when this thread dies

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

i think pinefox is scarily typical of people on the british 'left', and so a bit weird about teh jews -- shit like "They are probably to be distinguished from the Israel Lobby that Mears and Walsheimer have described (is that just a conspiracy theory? I don't think so: I think it's true)" is too close to anti-semitic for comfort imho, but then i totally stan for international jewry :/

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

drown u in goats

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

gross

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

i know id stay away form that guy if i were u

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

no way, he promised me beers

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

fair

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

pinefox also hated the sex and the city movie :/

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, that word does jump out (xpost to nrq), but the spirit of the whole post seems to be about deflating the myth, rather than engaging it.

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)

Which had a Jew as its star. QED.

xp

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)

YEAH.

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)

lol okay, can we talk about broccoli instead of the pinefox pls

broccoli is more interesting plus you can wrap it in bacon OMG OM NOM NOM

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

sb

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

talking about bacon pretty anti-kosher tho

velko, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)

i like broccoli i hav some in my fridge

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)

good pizza: broccoli and meatball!

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)

the way the flavor clings to all the little sprouts!

― Surmounter, Friday, February 27, 2009 3:22 PM (5 minutes ago)

^^ this

broccoli is so good, fuck gabbneb

lol xps

cindy (goole), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/fez_/goat.gif

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)

wait, wtf was gabbneb's problem with broccoli? he truly hates EVERYTHING that is good doesn't he?

xpost o fuck

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)

WHOA

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)

I never really liked broccoli until I tried it roasted at high heat. It gets crispy and almost scorched in places. I eat it all the time now. xpost wtf

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

that is a pic of gabbs in his true form btw

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

guys, have you ever tried fried broccoli?

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

the real j0hn d?

lol xp

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

e you are killing me

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)

thats not john d, he's catholic

this is john d

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y109/fez_/goat2.gif

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)

ahhhhh

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.iol.co.za/data/picdb//newspic4004d3666c990 xposts holy shit ethan

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

lololool omg xp

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

i think pinefox is scarily typical of people on the british 'left'

why do you always put 'left' in scare quotes

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:40 (sixteen years ago)

for reference

goat eyes

the powerful claw (J0rdan S.), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

I'm waiting for pleasant plains to arrive and start screaming like a little girl

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

why do you always put 'left' in scare quotes

― its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:40 (36 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Wrong thread, take it to ILE and me and NRQ can drop knowledge/regurgitate old Nick Cohen columns at you.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

loooool

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)

way behind on this thread but holy shit @ ethan taking a stand about who has a history of using the N-word on the board and who gets to call them out on it

I'm your biggest fan, here's your suggest ban (some dude), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)

lol thought the same, good luck cutting and pasting those search results

bnw, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)

only used in defense of ratt fans and to troll the vice magazine thread

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)

cf "my ratt niggas"

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)

this is just like how you got all pissed off when i implied that massachusetts was a racist hellhole

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:51 (sixteen years ago)

wha massachusetts isnt in the south ???

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)

guys i sense this thread going donner party on us

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

i know that is why it's so weird! i mean wtf!

xpost uh did u just threaten to eat me dude?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

btw u r vv tasty

velko, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

lol

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

Timestamp Board Action Reason
Friday, February 27, 2009 4:24 PM I Love Cricket User throw some sb's (Lamp) has been Yellow Carded
Jews control Hollywood and the worldwide financial system

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

thread does also contain dom "destroy all rappers with big lips passantino" outraged by a dude saying there are some jewish people in the entertainment industry

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

lol at "big lips passantino"

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

ally maybe you should get the fffck over it pleasant plains had the same reaction as me initially - in the carolinas liquor stores are package stores, which is where we both thought u meant

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

clearly neither of you are serious at all

xpost oh good here comes mr sensitive why don't you guys go cry about it?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:56 (sixteen years ago)

go fuck urself b youre the one who sounds like ailsa or some shit crying all over the board about how i'm obsessed with racism cuz i took 1 shot at you for what i thought was carolina-hating

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

srsly this is 2003 all over again

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Friday, 27 February 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

http://singingfool.com/photos/499/002097_35.jpg

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ ilx

Tracy Michael Jordan Catalano (Jordan), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

i mean seriously i didn't care enough to get into it with either of you on that thread but have you ever googled package stores? it's pretty much O_o when you assume a bunch of northeastern posters talking about package stores are talking about a couple liquor stores in carolina when that's the common nomenclature for bodegas in the majority of new england and also a lot of eastern canada but it's about on par with it's ok for you to say "my ratt niggas" but not ok for some other person to say "my lil niggas" or whatever so settle down, u make yrself a target u takes the joeks.

xpost i actually wonder sometimes which posters get this is a joking and which ones don't, cue a board lawyer

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)

wait are tehre any board lawyers left after this day of reckoning

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)

it's ok for you to say "my ratt niggas" but not ok for some other person to say "my lil niggas"

no jury in the world would convict me

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

well in fairness i have to say "my ratt niggas" is really funny

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

I personally could use a board lawyer's perspective on all of this.

f f murray abraham (G00blar), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

i wonder what tuomas would have to say about all of this

k3vin k., Friday, 27 February 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

rip heaven needed what happened, i am confused

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

my 2 friends who are getting married in the fall are both lawyers

Surmounter, Friday, 27 February 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)

why can't I walk down the street free of suggest ban?

bnw, Friday, 27 February 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

You searched for bodegas in eastern canada
No article title matches

No page with that title exists.

Gonna have to send off for a correspondence course, I guess.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:10 (sixteen years ago)

wait are tehre any board lawyers left after this day of reckoning

they ain't got me yet

as far as I know max and jho are still on the loose

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)

we're starting a band, gonna call it antimony & the jhonsons

鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 27 February 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

honestly its not the same w/o my old foil judge tomboto

ice cr?m, Friday, 27 February 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

we could all just start yellin at you...?

pp, i hear the british call them cornershops, try that instead of bodega.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)

why can't I walk down the street free of suggest ban?

― bnw, Friday, February 27, 2009 4:05 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

this was pretty good guys

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:26 (sixteen years ago)

Still hardline against sb but if it leads to technicolor threads like this then wow, just wow.

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)

technicolor yawn threads

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:43 (sixteen years ago)

http://ec.mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/panda-puke.png

молодых нижн&#, Friday, 27 February 2009 23:45 (sixteen years ago)

"hi guys whatd i miss"

what was it that put gabbneb's sbs over the limit

am i to understand it was a broccoli beef

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:52 (sixteen years ago)

Final five posts:

double bird strike (gabbneb) wrote this on thread Friends, let us name 200 exquisite soft rock riffs on board I Love Music on 26-Feb-2009

35. Here Comes the Sun

double bird strike (gabbneb) wrote this on thread K'Naan: C/D S/D on board I Love Music on 26-Feb-2009

dude played hand drum at the show tonight. the guitar player was a dorky white dude. somali flags in the audience. awesome.

double bird strike (gabbneb) wrote this on thread 2009 American Politics Thread I - My President Likes Spiderman on board I Love Everything on 26-Feb-2009

It's Keith O's "...oh God" caught on mic when Jindal wanders out.

it was Matthews

double bird strike (gabbneb) wrote this on thread Top Chef: New York on board I Love Everything on 26-Feb-2009

we win!

double bird strike (gabbneb) wrote this on thread K'Naan: C/D S/D on board I Love Music on 26-Feb-2009

I've been bumping the old one in regular rotation for weeks and the new one is just n/l. The first half-dozen or so are straight, as the kids say, fire, and the back several take it home. Sure, if rap gets jealous is very production-y, not as organic as the better original, but it's still a great tune. And yeah, I love that dude doesn't care about rules and goes melodic without even wyclef's self-consciousness. Best thing I've heard in a while.

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Friday, 27 February 2009 23:59 (sixteen years ago)

As the kids say

deej da 5'9 (deej), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:09 (sixteen years ago)

do not express opinions about music on ilm or people who disagree with you will s-ban that ass, I thought everybody understood this

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:09 (sixteen years ago)

also do not fail to know who a famous american is

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:11 (sixteen years ago)

You know I can totally see somebody on the politics thread reading that correction--"It was Matthews"--thinking "this smug fuckin pedant" and SBing him not really knowing the consequences involved.

no, it wasn't me.

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:13 (sixteen years ago)

Xxp
Bitch bitch bitch

deej da 5'9 (deej), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:16 (sixteen years ago)

As the kids say

I mean, this is where I get kinda "TUOMAS WAS RIGHT" about this shit - ppl were s-banning Gabbneb because they didn't like the way he talked/were reminded by his style that they didn't like him? fuck that imo - though the flaw isn't in the function, it's in people using it wrong. and do not misunderstand me, that dude was a dick to me on many occasions but "I'm s-banning you 'cause I don't like your style," that's some guilty-of-assholism stuff.

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:17 (sixteen years ago)

thinking "this smug fuckin pedant"

^^^they'd be right is the thing

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:18 (sixteen years ago)

though the flaw isn't in the function, it's in people using it wrong.

But if that's how people use it (and it is), then surely the flaw is in the function.

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)

guns don't kill ppl etc

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

the suggest ban button does

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

oh no! what have you heard??????

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:21 (sixteen years ago)

I have my screen config tricked so instead of "Suggest Ban" it says "Strangle While Asleep"

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:22 (sixteen years ago)

um, it's also possible that the final sb was in relation to an older post that the sb-er had only just read.

Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:23 (sixteen years ago)

Hence my suggestion that the ban was due to the Matthews post and not the post about Wyclef

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:27 (sixteen years ago)

cause like

i can't see SBing a dude because of how he feels about wyclef

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:27 (sixteen years ago)

yeah um those last five posts don't really show why he was banworthy at all. he wasn't just a richie with a lame "style," he was also creepy (level 2) and then, the reason i sb'ed him and the reason i agree w/ omar's "good riddance," he came across as totally fuckin hateful a lot of the time.

xxxpost

My carpal tunnel is too bad to go "all over." (Matt P), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:28 (sixteen years ago)

like one of the only people i've read on ilx that made me feel a little colder ever time? dude was worse than deeznuts or even mickey imo

My carpal tunnel is too bad to go "all over." (Matt P), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:31 (sixteen years ago)

ok not mickey

My carpal tunnel is too bad to go "all over." (Matt P), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:32 (sixteen years ago)

the thing yall seem to be missing is that gabbneb was awesome

why?

because he was terrible (which, sadly, often made it impossible not to SB him)

he was my exact opposite and i did not get along with dude at ALL, but to be real dude was a hero for not being like anybody else and for pound for pound providing more lols than anyone currently on ilx, intentional or not

in sum, i will miss gabbneb 1 time for every suggest ban i gave him/attempted to give him

that's a lot of missing

one for my frenemy

*pours it

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:38 (sixteen years ago)

i will sop up your pour with a rag and squeeze it into a glass and drink it while gabbneb's e-corpse continues to thirst

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:49 (sixteen years ago)

he's probably alright irl though

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:49 (sixteen years ago)

hes probably not actually

but on here hes a lol a line

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:53 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, this is where I get kinda "TUOMAS WAS RIGHT" about this shit - ppl were s-banning Gabbneb because they didn't like the way he talked/were reminded by his style that they didn't like him? fuck that imo - though the flaw isn't in the function, it's in people using it wrong. and do not misunderstand me, that dude was a dick to me on many occasions but "I'm s-banning you 'cause I don't like your style," that's some guilty-of-assholism stuff.

― Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:17 (26 minutes ago)

see this is where I'm coming from

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:53 (sixteen years ago)

bet u could clown him irl and it'd be fun he'd take it ok

молодых нижн&#, Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:54 (sixteen years ago)

or he'd instruct his butler/personal killer to off you in the parking lot

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:56 (sixteen years ago)

he really is the closest thing ilx has ever had to a bond supervillain

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:56 (sixteen years ago)

ur making me miss him

молодых нижн&#, Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:57 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.pdagold.com/img/themes/large/0000010669.jpg

^imo

xp

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:58 (sixteen years ago)

this place really will not be the same without him

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:58 (sixteen years ago)

we have lost a top notch foil.

estela, Saturday, 28 February 2009 01:59 (sixteen years ago)

we have lost so many

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:02 (sixteen years ago)

As soldiers straggled back to the Confederate lines along Seminary Ridge, Lee feared a Union counteroffensive and tried to rally his center, telling returning soldiers and Gen. Wilcox that the failure was "all my fault." General Pickett was inconsolable for the rest of the day and never forgave Lee for ordering the charge. When Lee told Pickett to rally his division for the defense, Pickett allegedly replied, "General Lee, I have no division."

pro bowl was fun (omar little), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:04 (sixteen years ago)

ilx life without grady and gabbneb is worth living, y/n

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:04 (sixteen years ago)

has grady left ilx? I knew I hadn't seen him.

Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:05 (sixteen years ago)

what even happened to gr80

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:06 (sixteen years ago)

yes, where is that blimmin grady.

estela, Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:07 (sixteen years ago)

inquiring minds

Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:07 (sixteen years ago)

No one knows; he just stopped posting.

Lots of praying with no breakfast! (HI DERE), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:07 (sixteen years ago)

shame, cool guy

a raggamuffin is a type of cat (a-bomb), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:08 (sixteen years ago)

u can write to a 1p3 mod for an official press release

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:09 (sixteen years ago)

I keep asking where grady went, but there is no answer for "he posts in spurts [ed: ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww]...he'll come back..."

I shall always respect my elders (Z S), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:09 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.pdagold.com/img/themes/large/0000010669.jpg

^imo

xp

― Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:58 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

rong, windows mobile

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 02:11 (sixteen years ago)

ok the thing about gabbneb and broccoli, i said that i found it amusing that broccoli was mentioned in the cole porter song "you're the top" as one of life's awesome and/or novel pleasures, since it went from being fresh off the boat and buzzed-about in the '30s to having a reputation today as a vegetable people wrinkle their noses at. and he got all haughty and was like, broccoli is v. popular, many americans eat broccoli, i think you'll find it is common in supermarkets, and i was like dude i know but i'm just talking about its image in like cartoons and stuff.

Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Saturday, 28 February 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)

ok the thing about gabbneb and broccoli

didn't even have to read the rest of this lololololol

its gotta be HOOSy para steen (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 28 February 2009 07:30 (sixteen years ago)

for those asking concrete examples of gabnebbishness, I SBed him "^likes black girls"

51 things I hate about you (The Reverend), Saturday, 28 February 2009 08:22 (sixteen years ago)

should read.. I SBed him FOR "^likes black girls"

51 things I hate about you (The Reverend), Saturday, 28 February 2009 09:37 (sixteen years ago)

Wait...so you DON'T like black girls?

www.morrissey-cock.com (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 28 February 2009 09:48 (sixteen years ago)

o sbd gabs def more than 51 times single handedly and i feel like def justice has been served - im fine if comes back under a new name - but basically he got what he deserved

ice cr?m, Saturday, 28 February 2009 09:56 (sixteen years ago)

that time when i was half heartedly zinging him on some word play type post and he got all braggy abt some back in the day fap where everyone was perving on his girl and he guessed i wasnt around then and he called me bro it was so terrible and awful

ice cr?m, Saturday, 28 February 2009 09:59 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.utoronto.ca/stmikes/kelly/images/theexperiment.jpg

Gerard (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 28 February 2009 13:01 (sixteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v136/primrosehill/benbbag.jpg

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Saturday, 28 February 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)

and he called me bro it was so terrible and awful

man i don't know how you could stand having that happen. i mean i cant possibly think of anything worse than that.

Pashmina, Saturday, 28 February 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

cut it w/the sarcasm lets hav some sympathy 4 me

ice cr?m, Saturday, 28 February 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

pffff....

Pashmina, Saturday, 28 February 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

I cried the day gabbneb called icecr?m "bro"

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

REQUEST FOR "SUGGEST BRO" BUTTON AT NEXT CODE UPDATE

Sugban Stevens (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)

i heard my momma cry
i heard her pray the night gabbneb called ice cr?m "bro"
brotha what a night it really was
brotha what a fight it really was
glory be!

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://oneyearbibleimages.com/jesuswept2.jpg

k3vin k., Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)

bro the humanity

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)

huddled in the shower, weeping

bnw, Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_gBWX9nIa25o/R1QeN8iAxpI/AAAAAAAAAF4/6Bmcqgr8lY0/s1600-R/richie+tenenbaum.jpg

needle in jhøshea

mookieproof, Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

i guess the fap where all the dudes fawned over my chick was before your time, bro. that chick is v pretty - i like blondes too - but too blonde (and hair slightly too short) and pearly and small-nosed, fyi.

― banned substance (gabbneb), Friday, January 16, 2009 2:05 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

impossible to walk away unscathed

ice cr?m, Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

^likes white girls

gabbnebuchadnezzar (and what), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/c2/c10967.jpg

Sugban Stevens (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

― banned substance (gabbneb)

http://www.fotosearch.com/bthumb/ICL/ICL142/EVW_154C.jpg

mighty morbs'n power rangers (and what), Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

gabb's problem was adopting the amalgamated nu-nu-ilx style. it was a bad mix with his other attributes.

bnw, Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514B109M2PL._SS500_.jpg

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

"Still a little book, small enough and important enough to carry in your pocket, as I carry mine, bro."

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 17:11 (sixteen years ago)

the elements of stILXor

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

"New edition -- now with a 25,000 word introduction by N***** Ab***"

WmC, Saturday, 28 February 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

"Omit needless words, phrases, clauses, asides, ideas, thoughts, opinions, lists, and polls"

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

i died re: "needle in jhoshea" and ben b bag's reappearance natch

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:14 (sixteen years ago)

we have that elements of style book here in the office

Surmounter, Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)

I think it would ask you to remove "that" and "book" from that sentence if you asked it

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

I s-banned myself for that btw

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

don't be so hard on yourself!

does anyone else find Permalink a really cute word? Permalink. just has a ring to it

Surmounter, Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)

you are so cute

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)

i just want to squeeze you!!!!!

the styles are a lie (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/ate/marketing/curriculum/ecommerce/course1/rubberducky.jpg

Surmounter, Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

I'm waiting for pleasant plains to arrive and start screaming like a little girl

I saw it at work and went ah fuck, motherfuckit under my breath, but I didn't do any custos boldface screaming since that would have only encouraged the rest of ya.

I really really don't like that thing though. Altered States, Star Trek I and the Eyes of Laura Mars really did a number on me. Watch what movies you let your six-year-olds watch, folks.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 28 February 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

showed up on my news feed a few mins ago.... dunno what it means

J M E R is staying sober tonight so she can pick up her sb later =).
about an hour ago

z-hongro (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)

significant brother

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:48 (sixteen years ago)

sausage biscuit

if you don't stan for something, you will fall for anything (roxymuzak), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)

^ euphemism

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)

suffering bastard

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)

stupid boyfriend

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)

or maybe she's just going to pick up some antimony

鬼の手 (Edward III), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:52 (sixteen years ago)

sisterban buttez

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:52 (sixteen years ago)

"In this day and age, what the fuck is this world coming to? I can't believe this, prejudice against - a Jew broad - prejudice against Italians": I usually say this within five minutes of meeting Jewish girls. And as a result have no Jewish friends.

― Dom Passantino, Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:02 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and what, Sunday, 1 March 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

^have a jewish friend now

Blap for Lashes (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Sunday, 1 March 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

btw i didnt go searching dom + jewz im just reading all the goodfellas threads after playing "and then he kissed me" 15 times last night at 4am

and what, Sunday, 1 March 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

i bet he won the game, right

Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Sunday, 1 March 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

suggest ban clicked more often by british ppl y/n

My carpal tunnel is too bad to go "all over." (Matt P), Sunday, 1 March 2009 23:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.redorbit.com/news/general/24895/linguists_suggest_banned_words_for_2004/index.html

if you don't stan for something, you will fall for anything (roxymuzak), Sunday, 1 March 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)

SUGGEST BAN CHRISTMAS

the innermost wee guy (onimo), Monday, 2 March 2009 00:36 (sixteen years ago)

controversial

if you don't stan for something, you will fall for anything (roxymuzak), Monday, 2 March 2009 00:38 (sixteen years ago)

http://i39.tinypic.com/2mq153b.jpg

suge banned

bnw, Monday, 2 March 2009 00:43 (sixteen years ago)

Society's fault? No. You s-banned yourself

Whiney G. Weingarten (J0hn D.), Monday, 2 March 2009 00:50 (sixteen years ago)

Steeleye Sban

Captain Save-Ahlo (The stickman from the hilarious xkcd comics), Monday, 2 March 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

tuomas the rhymer

velko, Monday, 2 March 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)

Apologies if this has already been copied here. Tuomas's comments on the facebook ilx wall:

Tuomas wrote
at 01:13 on 28 February 2009
So, it looks I've gotten enough suggest bans to get barred from ILX. I know I can be extremely stubborn when debating things, and I think it's a pretty stupid reason to get banned for, but on the other hand I didn't want to be discouraged from speaking my mind just because my suggest ban count was high. That's not the way discussion on ILX used to work in the past, and I hope it's not the way of the future either.

At the very least I hope people will be careful when clicking the suggest ban button, and not just do it for fun. Like Dan said, it's your choice whether to use the function or not.

Tuomas wrote
at 11:03 on 01 March 2009
By the way, I do hope that the mods will at some point agree that permanently banning people due to 51 suggest bans isn't the proper way to do things, and that me and other banned folks will be able to return to ILX. If this doesn't happen, I guess it's bye bye to ILX then. Didn't think things would end up this way after 6 years of posting there.

punk is deady brewster (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 09:13 (sixteen years ago)

Can't he just come back to the board as 'Tuomas2' or whatever?

Fight scenes don't hold a candle to Asian action (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

i couldn't have seen him doing that

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

he should try the username "samout"

homie bhabha (max), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

Tuommy Boy

eman, Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

why so siruos

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 3 March 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

my name is mr. samout ... yes that's it

peep game on gas prices (deej), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)

too bad theres already a mr snrub

peep game on gas prices (deej), Tuesday, 3 March 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)

mr golden snrub

s1ocki, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 04:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.nightwish.com/gallery/albums/userpics/00_tuomas.jpg

eman, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 04:47 (sixteen years ago)

homopainen

velko, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 04:49 (sixteen years ago)

has b_s 'gone clear'?

University Challops (stevie), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)

Wednesday, March 4, 2009 2:29 AM Site burt_stanton has been banned permanently.

velko, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 11:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://djdocrok.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/oh-snap.jpg

Jesus Lulz (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 11:26 (sixteen years ago)

The candle burned out long before the legend ever did.

Non-Homosexual Male Fan Of Kate Bush (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 11:38 (sixteen years ago)

he taught us so much

unfit octomom (rent), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 12:35 (sixteen years ago)

haha guys I SB'd stanton last night, I couldn't remember if I'd done it before but dude was just pissing me off lately. so I might've been the person to put him over! democracy works!

Mr. Sensitivity (some dude), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 14:23 (sixteen years ago)

I'm not sure exactly what post it was that I clicked on but it might been the "precious MIDDLE AMERICA" one in the Jimmy Fallon thread.

Mr. Sensitivity (some dude), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 14:23 (sixteen years ago)

http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Politics/Images/candlelight-vigil.jpg

burt_stanton and ernie (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

how long

how long must we sing this song

how long

homie bhabha (max), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 16:01 (sixteen years ago)

it's a beautiful day!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

loooooooooooooool burt

hoosteenanny (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)

;_;

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

you guys sure know how to kill the lulzbringers

this place is going to be quiet as a library soon

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

I get the feeling it will continue to ring with posts from people complaining there's no one left to laugh at for some time to come.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 17:26 (sixteen years ago)

imo the absence of a few posters with extremely 'consistent' (repetitive) and provocative posting styles does nothing to effect the volume of board traffic but could vastly improve the signal to noise ratio. i.e. fewer threads being fattened by 200 posts of "oh burt/tuomas/etc. you so crazy tell me more about how crazy you are"

soon as I stanton in the club I'ma burt (some dude), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

rip burt heaven needed some white pants

been HOOS, where yyyou steene!? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

I get the feeling it will continue to ring with posts from people complaining there's no one left to laugh at for some time to come.

― Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 12:26 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark

be patient, it does take a while to gentrify a neighborhood

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

whoa burt was banned? that's weird

Surmounter, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

i.e. fewer threads being fattened by 200 posts of "oh burt/tuomas/etc. you so crazy tell me more about how crazy you are"

at least 51`people are gonna be totally bummed about not being able to do that is my guess

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

hipsters up in there heaven probably have no idea what hit em

burt_stanton and ernie (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

"all these halos and gay-ass harps... it's like, who're you trying to impress?"

shirt_panton (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

wait j0hn is your logic that every single person who sugbanned someone is secretly thinking "oh i enjoy our little chats, i hope you never leave ILX"? because I can promise you at least one person who SB'd burt was not doing so as a weird online way of playfully tousling his hair.

e-thuggin, rollin on dubs, off up in the club wildin like what (some dude), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

unless you mean each banned person has as many fans as detractors i guess, in which case nm.

e-thuggin, rollin on dubs, off up in the club wildin like what (some dude), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

don't want to speak for j0hn but I'm thinking the latter

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know what I mean I'm just sayin dumb shit - I mean, I guess what I mean is that in this group (as in any group) some pick-on-this-guy dynamics emerge (tuomas a great example - nobody can deny the righteousness of the charges against him, but he's hardly image-flooding the board/launching personal attacks on posters, etc etc - suggbans on Tuomas seem kinda of the "fuck this guy" aspect, which imo is kinda bullshit - his tendency to belabor an issue past the point of total heat death is incredibly frustrating, but the anti-Tuomas vibe feels/felt more like "I don't want to play with that kid" than "he is totally ruining everything and poses a threat to the health of the board"

which, thinking that, I think that suggbanning Tuomas was/is as much a function of meanness as of concern for the health of the boards, which is what I think suggbanning should be all about, except for when I suggban Nabisco for always knowing shit about shit and thinkin he's all that, well fuck that, it's suggban from 10 different accounts for you Mr. OTM

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

the more i think about tuomas there was such a disconnect between how he acted on regular threads (interesting, slightly quirky finnish guy) and how he acted on some of the meta threads (like, everyone gets yr point, there is no excuse for you not closing the thread and letting it go).

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)

It was that contradiction in tone that led to the trolling accusations, IMO. As a board moderator, I was on the verge of temp-banning him anyway, not because of his position, but because he was not actually adding anything to the conversation and was existing purely to keep an aggravating discussion that everyone had made their minds up on going. Had more people expanded on his rhetoric or had he himself had more to say than "I don't think we should allow posters who don't like someone to click a link that increases their likelihood of being banned," I don't think he would have been banned.

(altho linking St0rmfr0nt on another thread didn't help him very much)

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know what I mean I'm just sayin dumb shit - I mean, I guess what I mean is that in this group (as in any group) some pick-on-this-guy dynamics emerge (tuomas a great example - nobody can deny the righteousness of the charges against him, but he's hardly image-flooding the board/launching personal attacks on posters, etc etc - suggbans on Tuomas seem kinda of the "fuck this guy" aspect, which imo is kinda bullshit - his tendency to belabor an issue past the point of total heat death is incredibly frustrating, but the anti-Tuomas vibe feels/felt more like "I don't want to play with that kid" than "he is totally ruining everything and poses a threat to the health of the board"

which, thinking that, I think that suggbanning Tuomas was/is as much a function of meanness as of concern for the health of the boards, which is what I think suggbanning should be all about, except for when I suggban Nabisco for always knowing shit about shit and thinkin he's all that, well fuck that, it's suggban from 10 different accounts for you Mr. OTM

― Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 3:22 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

just sb'd you for this

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:34 (sixteen years ago)

the feeling's mutual

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

kidding, much love to GA

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

(altho linking St0rmfr0nt on another thread didn't help him very much)

These parenthetical statements that keep getting added are cracking me up:

"Gabbneb was an all right poster who did come across as smug or snobby and was rather obstinate in his opinions. His travelogue chatter copied and pasted from the People's Almanac cluttered up quite a few threads and he had weird opinions on what women could be objectified. But banning him may be a bit too much.

(Although I SB'ed him for posting an animated 600 x 800 gif of two men sharing Santorum with each other after my boss walked by and saw it.)"

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

sugg-bans should be temporary

Jesus Lulz (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

if linking to stormfront was all it took for a ban id be deep in the sb grave

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

the thing is yeah I think I SB'd Tuomas for not fucking goin "OK, I get it, I disagree, that's as far as it goes" on some meta-thread too

I mean I am genetically predisposed to not being able to shut up but I & my whole family are fucking Silent Cal next to Tuomas

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

I think the biggest users of the SB are all members of the and what fan club a.w. so yr clean

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

i really do think tuomas was a sophisticated meta troll and its tough not to get banned for that.... i mean the same way that around 03 i started playing up all the belligerent racial stuff folks had been accusing me of, or in 05 when i was baiting democrats in damn near every thread, its not str8 up calum style lonely-psycho trolling but its that much more irritating because you maintain a non-troll persona on the boards that lends legitimacy to your continued existence

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

yeah I hear you actually, that seems exactly right, and I should make my position clear: I only SB somebody when I think he's being either mean or totally, willfully obstinate, and as a narcissist I feel my criteria are totally awesome. with Tuomas, it's like, yeah, he's being irritating, but I get a feel for how I think it's in his nature to be the way he is - you know, that he's a member of the community with an irritating behavioral tic. Like, for example, me. Which is where I think temp-ban is a brilliant solution - "everybody seems to think you should stfu and you don't seem to hear them; here, let me help": actually an act of kindness, of redirection. I can't imagine that all 51 SBs our man in Finland racked up were of that nature. Which is troublesome to me, being the hand-wringing type.

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

dude J0hn, I can ABSOLUTELY imagine that all 51 SBs Tuomas racked up were of that nature

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

i guess that's the thing--i didn't think it was in his nature because i never rly saw the dude be irritating outside of the secret borads thread and the sug ban thread.

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

Which is where I think temp-ban is a brilliant solution - "everybody seems to think you should stfu and you don't seem to hear them; here, let me help": actually an act of kindness, of redirection.

Bookmark Get The Hook! Permalink

cindy (goole), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

i never thought tuomas' posts were a big deal, mostly i liked the lols of having someone around asking stuff like who the president of the united states was and if water was safe to drink.

'event horizon' director paul WS anderson (omar little), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

dude J0hn, I can ABSOLUTELY imagine that all 51 SBs Tuomas racked up were of that nature

I concede the point to the mod! Like Tuomas, I have a real distaste for the idea that clique-ish bully stuff could result in bannage, but it's totally the case that I could be bringing my own issues to that - that 51 different people were like "I have to stop you, and I take little pleasure in it."

btw my new band is called Area 51 and all our lyrics are c/p'd from ILTMI.

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

the thing is, i dont think anyone really wanted tuomas banned, but fuck yeah he deserved that 1/51th of a ban i gave him

sug_banton (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

hey goole you could always bookmark my nuts and save yrself some time btw

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

"everybody seems to think you should stfu and you don't seem to hear them; here, let me help": actually an act of kindness, of redirection. I can't imagine that all 51 SBs our man in Finland racked up were of that nature. Which is troublesome to me, being the hand-wringing type.

― Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 2:49 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark

ehh i think this is exactly what it was - everyone was directing him - directly, with verbalized posts - to stop making posts about how he hates SBs

2 Many Omas (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

k3v that's actually the best summary of the tuomas sitch i've seen

He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

the thing is, i dont think anyone really wanted tuomas banned, but fuck yeah he deserved that 1/51th of a ban i gave him

^^^this is likely the prevalent position

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

john relax i was agreeing with you!

cindy (goole), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

also lol at J0hn aggroing over a jokey rename of the Suggest Ban link

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

lol sorry goole I'm drunk

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

hey goole you could always bookmark my nuts and save yrself some time btw

― Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 3:54 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

mountain scrotes

stanton in the shadows of brotown (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

i mean, when the clowns pull someone off the stage at the apollo it's an act of mercy

xps

cindy (goole), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

I get it now, sorry yo, suggest beer

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

allagash curieux

'event horizon' director paul WS anderson (omar little), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

goole you are pulling some amazing aggro today, it must be a sign

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2007/10/drudgesiren.giftehresa txted me to say she just met gabbnebhttp://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2007/10/drudgesiren.gif

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

(j0hn i think u just got erik cole back)

mookieproof, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)

oh fuck yes that calls for a beer

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

willingly? xxpost?

'event horizon' director paul WS anderson (omar little), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

the thing is, i dont think anyone really wanted tuomas banned, but fuck yeah he deserved that 1/51th of a ban i gave him

^^^this is likely the prevalent position

so why not start a poll to find out? should tuomas be banned y/n/what's tuomas

this should be standard protocol when someone gets sb'd, given the problems with its implementation.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:20 (sixteen years ago)

like a sb veto?

2 Many Omas (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

this should be standard protocol when someone gets sb'd, given the problems with its implementation.

nice way to sneak a supposition in there

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

i am willing to be the first person to vocally state that i absolutely 100% wanted tuomas to get banned, btw.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)

If your desire is to make ILX be even more navel-gazing, meta-obsessed and totally paralyzed in how to manage poster integration, then sure, start your poll.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)

If, on the other hand, you would like to avoid becoming Tuomas Jr, I would suggest recognizing you've made your point and moving on.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

i would encourage anybody upset over t-bag's sb to start a thread where they whine about sb-ing for 350 posts so they can join him

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

ppl who i miss who were suggest banned, in order--

1) gabbneb
2) captainlorax
3) burt_stanton
4) deeznuts
5) tuomas
X) l0u1s jagg3r (disqualified)

homie bhabha (max), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)

^^i was thinking about starting a poll but then decided against it

2 Many Omas (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

gabnebb met a..girl???

Non-Homosexual Male Fan Of Kate Bush (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

http://themoldydoily.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/terence_stamp_the_collector.jpg

'event horizon' director paul WS anderson (omar little), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:34 (sixteen years ago)

nice way to sneak a supposition in there

― panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 4:23 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

this thread is full of posts from people (myself included) who support a suggest ban functionality but don't particularly like the way it currently works, so that's not some wayout conjecture on my part. I could go back and pull those quotes and repost them, but at this point I have to assume that would get filed as further evidence of my "bad behavior".

but hey, even our hardest hardman agreed:

I really don't know what the answer is here, I mean I was initially against the suggest ban thing, but the kind of mean-spirited ganging-up that I was convinced would happen is actually not going on at all

I do also agree that there should be an age-out process for the suggest ban tally, like each vote should only last 60 days or so. of course at the end of that 60 days that user could vote again, so if there's a bunch of people you really annoy daily, you won't get much help

― El Tomboto, Monday, November 10, 2008 9:27 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.vfw8680.org/salute_flag_alt.jpg

2 Many Omas (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

wait lorax was banned? i thought he posted just today!

ps dan i don't know what it means but

cindy (goole), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:40 (sixteen years ago)

lorax isnt banned.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)

thank god

homie bhabha (max), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)

If your desire is to make ILX be even more navel-gazing, meta-obsessed and totally paralyzed in how to manage poster integration, then sure, start your poll.

― Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 4:26 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

If, on the other hand, you would like to avoid becoming Tuomas Jr, I would suggest recognizing you've made your point and moving on.

― Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 4:27 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark

I would only start a poll like this if the mods agree that the results would be honored. that is, if ilxors vote by majority to lift the ban on tuomas, then his ban gets lifted. I'm not interested in navelgazing and more discussion, I'm interested in action and a fair process. deal?

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)

those who fuorget histuory are duoomed to repeat it

sug_banton (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think a poll is necessary to prove that most people willing to speak up on the matter are vocally for unbanning Tuomas, is what I'm getting at here.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)

1) tuomas is annoying as hell.
2) suggest ban as implemented was/is a bad idea.

not mutually exclusive.

bnw, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

am I right here, if we eliminate suggest ban but keep Tuomas banned everybody's happy, including Tuomas? cool

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

never get rid of suggest ban, we're finally getting to the event horizon where all the tards are dropping like flies

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)

sb'd you for use of "tards"

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

look I'm not trying to be a dick or tuomas jr or whatever

I'm just trying to find a way for the people besides the 51 random folks who hit the suggban button to get heard, and also give a chance for the people who hit suggban and who regret it now to undo their vote

if those 51 people still feel that tuomas should be banned, then it should be enough to keep the ban enforced, given the number of people who vote in the average ILX poll

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

what, precisely, do you think has been happening in this thread

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)

I think I have a solution

1) if you s-ban somebody, the act of your having done so is recorded on a thread in a locked forum
2) the poster who was s-banned and the s-banner are both automatically admitted to the forum by virtue of the s-ban exchange
3) everyone who ever posts to the locked forum is shot and buried in a shallow grave east of Hemet

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

^sb'd for suggesting that ilxors should be murdered

2 Many Omas (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

are mods defending s-ban because they believe in it, or because its hard-wired into the code and keith doesnt hang out here often enough to ask him to remove it

homie bhabha (max), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

what happens if we suggest ban the mods

bnw, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:10 (sixteen years ago)

look I'm not trolling or modbaiting or trying to kick up shit for no reason

I wouldn't start a poll unless the mods agreed beforehand to honor the results - I'm trying in good faith to work with you guys here

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:11 (sixteen years ago)

What I think has been happening is that a lot of people have been saying "oh, Tuomas got banned? Maybe I shouldn't have sbed him, regardless of how insanely irritating he was" mixed in with a lot of "Tuomas never should have been banned, wtf???" surrounded by joeks and a few "no seriously, he was a total troll and had it coming" posts.

I don't see how starting another thread about this will drastically change or affect the conversation that happened here (past tense used because really only about 4 people are carrying it on at this point and only two of them seem to be in any way seriously invested in it)

I am defending sban because I believe in it. It hasn't turned into a tool for terrorizing people and everyone who has been struck by it to date has a history of trolling (intentionally or otherwise).

Sadly(?), mods can't be suggest banned.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)

^sb'd for suggesting that ilxors should be murdered

in yr heart you know I'm right

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

All of the moderators know that you and others would like for Tuomas to be unbanned, Edward. It is not necessary to run a poll to prove this point. The question as to whether Tuomas will be unbanned remains unanswered but, from my viewpoint, I find it highly unlikely that he will remain banned permanently; even though he trolled A LOT, he was ultimately harmless about it a la Geir; his crime is not so much in committing the sin as much as it is in not figuring out how to accurately read his audience.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

you know the thing is that ppl just need to listen to Dan because he is a rational kinda guy

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)

(in case anybody thinks I'm being sarcastic or something: that is not my style)

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

So, in summation, you can make the poll if you want to, but it won't tell us anything we haven't already heard and no, we're not yet prepared to open up every suggest banning to a board review of concerned citizens. We may decide to go this route in the future but it's not the way we're doing things now.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

or mods need to be more forthcoming that the bans aren't permanent :P xposts

bnw, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

Dan is way OTM.

SB'ing looks like a clusterfuck because the posters who accumulate mass SB totals tend to generate a lot of zings for their general WTFness. I haven't seen any examples of hugely uncontroversial posters accumulating loads of SBs out of pure spite. 51 SB votes is still way, way more than any ILX clique cd muster on its own.

And there is, to all intents and purposes, life after SB and by choosing to ignore that route it kinda suggests Tuomas has no desire to consider the reasons why he got 51'd in the first place.

Peaches Gandalf (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

I should say that the fact that I've never suffered a temp-ban or a 51 ban indicated that SB, generally, works

Cindy Sherman I'm Your #1 Fan (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)

The bans are permanent until the mods decide to revoke them. As is the case with all permanent bans, much like temporary bans expire after a certain date unless a moderator chooses to revoke it early.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

is there any reason a sban can't be implemented as temporary, though? wouldn't this really remove 95% of objections while still keeping 95% of the intent of introducing it in the first place?

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

And there is, to all intents and purposes, life after SB and by choosing to ignore that route it kinda suggests Tuomas has no desire to consider the reasons why he got 51'd in the first place.

i would just like to point out that noodle vague has been otm on this thread.

estela, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

the last i checked no one was rallying around the flag for deeznuts. xpost

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

xxpost Darragh I agree in principle but SBs leading to a temp-ban won't do anything to encourage people to be thoughtful in their use, quite the opposite I'd've thought.

Peaches Gandalf (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

51 becomes more easily to attain over time t/f?

bnw, Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:30 (sixteen years ago)

which i guess i could say in a less obtuse fashion by saying that really what a lot of people have a problem with isnt the sb system, it is one specific poster that got SB'd. things would be easier if people just said "i dont think tuomas should be banned" instead of acting like there is some shocking system failure to address.

i mean, im way more stunned by the gabbneb sb but all people seem to be mustering up is the occasional i miss that one guy that said that funny thing about blended haircuts.

xposts

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

well, I'm trying to address the failure here, pretty unsuccessfully.

the point I made way upthread is that suggban is going to take out the clearly offensive folks, then the choices will become more controversial - it's built into the design. no expiration of suggbans, everybody who has a strong opinion/personality is going to accumulate them over time. as for why tuomas is the rallying point, well gabbneb seemed to have some more overtly offensive habits so he was a little harder to defend, and tuomas was just an occasionally annoying dude. there will be more cases to discuss soon enough I'm sure. we can wait for a few more to drop off like flies but I'm not sure why we need to if the writing's on the wall? it's up to the mods to decide but ppl are frustrated with the system, and they're mostly being told to stfu, or acting too cool to care.

hell, if I get sb'd I doubt anyone will miss my lame carcass, but I don't like the chilling effect of the sb. I never had a serious problem with gabbneb, or tuomas, or even burt_stanton. at some points recently, burt was the only entertaining thing happening on the board. when the system starts banning entertaining folks then I have to ask what's the point? and if he comes back less burt_stanton-ish than before, then I start feeling like b.f. skinner is running the board and frankly I never liked that dude.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

i hope you dont mind the "chilling effect of the sb" i just gave you

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

this is like that part in bad santa where everybody falls over after punching each other in the nuts

abebe¿abebe (and what), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

naw, it's cool. I'm not hatin' the playa I'm hatin' the game.

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:54 (sixteen years ago)

"chilling effect of the sb" vs "excelsior syndrome"

'event horizon' director paul WS anderson (omar little), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

EIII, i am honestly confused by how you fail to see that your personal preferences about who is just annoying and who is entertaining dont outweigh 51 people that feel otherwise.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:58 (sixteen years ago)

honestly the only thing that is really shitty about SB is that it's easily spoofed---if someone wanted another poster gone they could stuff the ballot with sockpuppet votes. i'm sure both gabbs and tuomas collected more than a few votes from socks

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:11 (sixteen years ago)

because I don't think that 51 people feel otherwise. I think tuomas got a lot of lol sb's, and sb's from people who decided after the fact that they made a mistake.

I'm willing to make a poll to test that theory but I'm not going to if it's just going to result in more discussion. again, that's up to you and I accept dan's answer that it's being taken under consideration.

and I'm not recommending a poll just for tuomas (he would be good one for starters) but for anybody who was sb'd.

I don't see the inconsistency in that logic. I'm not just repping for dudes who don't annoy me, I'm trying to find a way to make the system a little fairer given the constraint of not being able to modify the codebase.

xp to jj

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)

It would be a lot easier to argue in favor of the existence/threat of ballot-stuffing sockpuppetry if:

a) every registration wasn't approved by a moderator;
b) the people who have received bans from this system weren't known for trolling threads in various and sundry ways;
c) mods couldn't unban people who were actually ganged up upon.

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:27 (sixteen years ago)

I'm trying to find a way to make the system a little fairer given the constraint of not being able to modify the codebase.

you keep saying things like this, but what i dont understand is how the current system isnt "fair". if anything, overturning a SB using a second poll is unfair to anyone who has already exercised their right to vote on the issue at hand.

because I don't think that 51 people feel otherwise. I think tuomas got a lot of lol sb's, and sb's from people who decided after the fact that they made a mistake.

i know you think this is the case but srsly you might want to step outside of your opinion of how cuddlelovable tuomas seems to you and logically look at whether there is any reason to make this assumption.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:32 (sixteen years ago)

my assumption's based on ppl on this thread who have flat out said so

also I never said tuomas wasn't annoying, just that he wasn't offensive/harmful, not sure where the cuddlelovable stuff is coming from

鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)

RIP Edward III, heaven needed another Tuomas

it kinda suggests Tuomas has no desire to consider the reasons why he got 51'd in the first place.

Since he came back to specifically post that he doesn’t want to fight and thinks that an enforced break from [posting on] ILX will provide valuable time for reflection, this suggestion is very very “kinda”. I totally <3 Tuomas and hope he gets to come back, but jesus fuck if a couple months off will encourage him to LET IT GO when restating his position over and over and over on meta-admin threads then let’s throw a parade for the inventors of the suggest ban system.

Bernard's Butter (sic), Wednesday, 4 March 2009 23:58 (sixteen years ago)

Dan - a lot of your justifications revolve around subjective opinion. Which is fine, and I totally agree with, but it just speaks to how pointless and disruptive sb's are. Because the final call lies with the mods, as it did before sb's existed.

anyway, I'm done.

bnw, Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:05 (sixteen years ago)

I don't really like posting on meta-threads, but I did always feel that Tuomas was often accused of blindly restating stuff for no reason when in fact he was almost obliged to restate his position, because he kept getting the same shit thrown at him from people misunderstanding points he'd already made/just saying 'no, you're wrong, stfu' without extending the argument or actually proving their own point. A lot of the time threads like these just come down to getting the last word in, and I see little reason why he wasn't allowed to have that privilege when others were doing the exact same thing. I can understand more the annoyance at his 'what is this thing you call "bread"?' schtick, but even then sometimes the questions were perfectly valid.

On the other hand, I do think Edward III is overdoing it with the poll thing, by misreading Dan's 'it is a bad idea' into 'we will take it into consideration'.

As to the main point: yeah, the suggest ban system sucks, and really needs to be changed.

emil.y, Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:11 (sixteen years ago)

i really wonder if you people realize that SB-ing somebody does not actually kill them/destroy their computer. they can come back under a different name, and maybe (hopefully) with a newfound "maybe i should stfu every once in a while" attitude.

sug_banton (k3vin k.), Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

we're not yet prepared to open up every suggest banning to a board review of concerned citizens. We may decide to go this route in the future but it's not the way we're doing things now.

^ did I misread dan? ^

if so I'm more obtuse than previously suspected

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:24 (sixteen years ago)

my assumption's based on ppl on this thread who have flat out said so

― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 11:39 PM (Yesterday)

i just ctrl+F'd "tuo" on this entire thread and there are exactly 3 people who have said anything remotely like this, one of whom was clearly kidding.

just to make sure this point remains clear.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:44 (sixteen years ago)

tou each his own

velko, Thursday, 5 March 2009 00:46 (sixteen years ago)

it wasn't for no reason, it was just for no gain. he wasn't changing anyone's mind, none of the answers were changing what he thought, he would have been a lot better off just walking away and having some photos taken of himself in his derps, or posting 1993 trance youtubes

Bernard's Butter (sic), Thursday, 5 March 2009 01:16 (sixteen years ago)

Sadly(?), mods can't be suggest banned.

Suggest Ban Permalink
― Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Wednesday, March 4, 2009 2:12 PM Bookmark

HI DERE I SB'd you for this

ilx has drained my soul (The Reverend), Thursday, 5 March 2009 04:46 (sixteen years ago)

Tuomas was a mod (?)

Plaxico (I know, right?), Thursday, 5 March 2009 07:36 (sixteen years ago)

they're talking sitewide mods

Tuo Live Crew (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 5 March 2009 07:37 (sixteen years ago)

^sbanned in the usa

been HOOS, where yyyou steene!? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 5 March 2009 07:52 (sixteen years ago)

we're not discussing this on enough threads already, maybe this one will help

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 5 March 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

every time you post, i become more galvanized in my support of suggest bans just to spite you.

panfalutin' (jjjusten), Thursday, 5 March 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.