noob questions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

i'm not a bicyclist, no expert at all, but i've been thinking about getting one. since i wouldn't be using it for commuting, just tooling around a 2-3 mile radius, should i just get something basic? a "cruiser" type bike? i have no idea. and price, what's a good price?! no clues over here.

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)

I invariably recommend flatbar road in this circumstance. However before I commit, where do you live, what condition are the streets in, what bike stores do you have and do you have an REI nearby?

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)

i live in los angeles, i would likely be tooling around some neighborhoods that are fairly busy (echo park, silver lake, los feliz, east hollywood). the streets are "okay" and there aren't many hills where i'd be going, just slopes. there are a number of bike stores nearby (mostly small ones), and there are 3 REI stores on the other side of the city.

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

I would steer clear of cruisers because they are heavy. However it sounds like you could go single speed. I bring up REI as their Novara brand has a good rep around here as being fairly no nonsense, the staff are very nice and low pressure so shopping is pretty easy. Also worth checking what you have in terms of bike coops around you who will give you a bike for free if you put in some volunteer hours and build it yourself or sell you something that has been completely rebuilt for a couple of hundred or less.

Craiglist can be good but you need to know what you are looking for. Check out the local small shops too, they will be able to advise you. New you will be north of $500 for anything getting on for decent probably north of $700, although I have a friend who swears by his $120 POS bike from Walmart which he has done a bunch of loaded touring on (home-made racks), he does spend a lot of time fixing it though.

in the end you have to find something you like to ride. The COOP route is my favourite though.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.bicyclekitchen.com/who.html
http://bikeoven.com/
http://www.bikerowave.org/

Seems LA coops operate a little differently, you have to pay to play. Less focussed on getting new people riding and more on a sort of community workshop kind of a thing.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)

bicycle kitchen is pretty militant from what i have heard! there are a couple other bike spots in the immediate vicinity of that which have mixed reviews...

i'd be down with spending some $$$ on a cool bike. mostly interested in something that isn't some crazy lance armstrong sporty urban biker thing, something more casual. some of those ones you mentioned look good.

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

some crazy lance armstrong sporty urban biker thing

what does that mean? contradictory.

cutty, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

noob : /

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

what you want IS a "sporty urban biker thing" and trek probably makes a perfect entry level one for you

cutty, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/urban/

cutty, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

bike kitchen IS kind of insane, i wouldnt go there as a noob

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:55 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2211/2203230755_3355769669.jpg?v=0

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 22:58 (sixteen years ago)

hmm those are some good bikes, cutty

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

if it's just for tooling, not commuting or bein fast, then something ~shaped~ cruiser-y might not be a bad idea. that is, like the bike picture above. big wheels, fattish slicks, wide cruisy bars. setup as a single-speed (that one's got an internally geared hub) it'd be waaaay lighter than a cruiser bike and gas to ride around

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2420/2203168043_5e5934065f.jpg?v=0

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:02 (sixteen years ago)

what's the bike that's pictured, gbx?

xxxpost!

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:03 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.odditycentral.com/pics/a-bicycle-for-two.html

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:04 (sixteen years ago)

that's a surly karate monkey

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:05 (sixteen years ago)

I mean ~technically~ it's a mountain bike frame, but just search flickr for the myriad ways ppl set them up

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1172/528426882_838f852cf3.jpg?v=0

look at this guy right here

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:07 (sixteen years ago)

plus it comes in 'chum bucket red' now

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:07 (sixteen years ago)

this thing is dope! i bet it is fun as hell

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51807048@N00/528426898/

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:08 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/fastboy/382023282/

str8 class

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:11 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3449/3354614137_c742630078.jpg?v=0

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:11 (sixteen years ago)

this is like bike pr0n

macarooni (omar little), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:12 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigdummyberlin/2464700400/

wheeeee

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:13 (sixteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/mchesna/roughdraft.jpg

LA reppin'

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)

j/k that bike is despicable

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)

thing is: KMs are about $450 for the frame/fork. decent wheelset + tires will run close to ...$300? add in everything else and you're over a grand.

surly sells 'em complete for $1200, but they come with knobbly tires an ugly uncomfortable saddle and no moustache bars

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:19 (sixteen years ago)

I need noob bik for drunk summer roll outs

carne asada, Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:21 (sixteen years ago)

http://surlybikes.com/1X1_ltd.html

http://surlybikes.com/images/1x1_ltd_lg.jpg

ok what the hell

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:21 (sixteen years ago)

http://blog.makezine.com/162388357_1e253f8f85.jpg

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)

I really want that rubber chain bike FYI. Good for biking in a suit I hope.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:59 (sixteen years ago)

Surly's are awesome, get one of those.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 00:00 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.gorillabicycles.com/web/en/snowwhite/

wtf??

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 02:10 (sixteen years ago)

Raleigh One Way

http://www.raleighusa.com/bikes/road/one-way/

Raleigh Clubman

http://www.raleighusa.com/bikes/road/clubman/

Super Cub, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 07:36 (sixteen years ago)

yeah get a one way. great bikes. perfect for your needs

sonderborg, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 08:40 (sixteen years ago)

The One Way does look ideal. Do you think you'll find yourself going for longer weekend rides at all?

If you do find something you think suitable, come back to the thread and let us know what and we will thumbs up/down as appropriate.

Mark C, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 09:35 (sixteen years ago)

(Having said that, I think bikes with gears still make most sense in almost all situations. It's definitely worth test riding different styles of bikes, from full-on roadie to MTB with slicks and seeing which feels most fun and most suitable. And you can test ride new bikes from reputable shops, too)

Mark C, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 09:37 (sixteen years ago)

http://blog.makezine.com/162388357_1e253f8f85.jpg

wtf is happening at the "BB" there?

wilter, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 09:44 (sixteen years ago)

US raleigh and UK raleigh are not the same company any more, are they?

Prince of Persia (Ed), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 12:27 (sixteen years ago)

Also, this is still beautiful:

http://www.pashley.co.uk/products/guvnor.html

Prince of Persia (Ed), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 12:28 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.britishbicycle.com/pashley/guvnor/

Prince of Persia (Ed), Wednesday, 22 April 2009 12:29 (sixteen years ago)

US raleigh and UK raleigh are not the same company any more, are they?

I would guess not. They certainly have different product lines.

Super Cub, Wednesday, 22 April 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)

Is this a good deal for a fixie frame?
http://www.on-one-shop.co.uk/acatalog/Online_Catalogue_Il_Pompino_550.html

How much could I get the rest of the bits for?

Pro Creationism Soccer 2009 (ledge), Friday, 24 April 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)

That is a good deal. Its a great frame too, well liked in the messenger community. I reckon you could build it out for a couple of hundred.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Friday, 24 April 2009 13:45 (sixteen years ago)

I bought it. Friend has some spare wheels too, w00t.

Pro Creationism Soccer 2009 (ledge), Friday, 24 April 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)

wow those are cheap! and yeah, i've heard great things about the pompino

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 14:41 (sixteen years ago)

i've got a beat ass old trek that i've never liked very much frankly, i think it's time to get a decent road bike for tooling around. this is looking really great to me:

http://thehubbikecoop.org/itemdetails.cfm?LibId=53457

my question is, would it a better deal to find something similar used and have some work done on it? old 10-speed frames can't be that hard to get a hold of

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

it might be trickier than you think? mpls bike dorks are pretty on the ball when it comes to picking up nice old used bikes

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

wld agree here in denver, its got completely crazy to where if it has semi horizontal drops dood thinks its worth $x00.

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Friday, 24 April 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

talking about bare frame

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Friday, 24 April 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

also, i've heard bad things about ReCyles on Hennepin....inflated prices, bad mechanics, unscrupulous

OK... I have held on this one for a while, but here it is. This bike came into the shop a couple months ago, customer had just bought it from Recycle. They said something was wierd in the steering, our intial thought was maybe the headset was loose. Except when we grabbed the front brake and pushed the handlebar forward to check, the front wheel pivoted forward when the handlebar was pushed forward. Thats interesting... We took it in back and removed the fork to find that the steer tube had previously be severed clean off. They had put 2 pins through it, criss crossed and tacked them in. That was the remedy. Terribly, horribly disgustingly unsafe. That is someones face. Here is a link to the photos taked of the fork.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8293134@N08/2968936651/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8293134@N08/2968936525/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8293134@N08/2968936413/

good resource for mpls bike stuff, btw: mplsbikelove.com

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

omg wtf is all i can type

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Friday, 24 April 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

i know right? not sure if ReCycles did the tacking, but it's clear that, even if they didn't, they either didn't notice it or didn't care.

there's a whole thread on them on the mpls bike forum, most of it O_O wau how r u in business

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

hm yeah going the custom route right off is probably jumping in at the deep end.

still, that redline looks great, doesn't it? a road-style single speed is probably what i'm after, anyone have any recommendations?

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

kona paddy wagon: http://www.konaworld.com/09_paddywagon_u.cfm

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

Surly Steamroller http://www.surlybikes.com/steamroller_comp.html

Prince of Persia (Ed), Friday, 24 April 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.myspace.com/fixedgearsareforjerksandlesbians

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

:O≈≈≈≈≈≈≈

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

baahahahaha

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Friday, 24 April 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

never actually heard that band's music, mind

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)

but no i'm not interesting in a fixed gear tbh

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

steamrollers can be singlespeeds! it just depends on what you do with the rear wheel!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

!!!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 24 April 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

o i c

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 21:10 (sixteen years ago)

v v newb

goole, Friday, 24 April 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

steamrollers can be singlespeed, but I think they only come with a front brake stock. So you'd have to add a rear brake and a cable and a lever. Not such a big deal, but it will cost you a bit.

I've good things about that Redline, and the price is nice. I say go for it. The geometry is kind of slack, but that sounds like what you might like.

If you're looking for a budget option, a lot of people swear by the singlespeed offerings of bikesdirect.com

Super Cub, Saturday, 25 April 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

^I've HEARD good things about that Redline

Super Cub, Saturday, 25 April 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)

A slightly more expensive option:

http://www.salsacycles.com/casserollCompSS08.html

It has a semi horizontal dropout so it can be converted to gears at a later stage and I love the super skinny tubing.

Incidentally, you can still get last years surly steamroller, which was a much nattier brown, and it is cheaper.

http://bicyclewarehouse.com/itemdetails.cfm?ID=10948&site=google_base

Prince of Persia (Ed), Saturday, 25 April 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)

Here's one: Is buying a Schwinn ten speed off craigslist and making it a single speed and changing out the handlebars a) cost-effective b) the kind of thing I can do in my attic with no bike-maintenance experience c) at all a good idea?

en i see kay, Saturday, 25 April 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

also: Salsa is local!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 25 April 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.salsacromotostem.com/

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Saturday, 25 April 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)

Here's one: Is buying a Schwinn ten speed off craigslist and making it a single speed and changing out the handlebars a) cost-effective b) the kind of thing I can do in my attic with no bike-maintenance experience c) at all a good idea?

I don't have personal experience with conversions, but everything I've heard suggests that they are seldom that cost-effective, especially nowadays. You're unlikely to find a bargain, quality bike to work with on Craigslist. Prices for vintage road bikes are pretty inflated (or were before the economy headed south). So You'll have to expect to pay probably something like $100-200 just to get a decent bike to work with. Apparently there are still really cheap vintage bikes out there (fewer than there used to be, for sure), but you'll have to prowl Salvation Army shops and yard sales. Even then, you may not strike gold.

Once you get the bike, you'll have to invest in some parts and tools. The bike may need some work to function well, which will cost money. So, I've heard people say that a conversion often costs $200-300 (sometimes more) when it's all said and done.

If you want to learn about bikes and have that feeling of pride/accomplishment, then it makes sense. Otherwise, buy a bike from bikesdirect.com

Seriously, bikesdirect.com is a very good possibility. The bikes are really popular with people on a budget who want a nice bike. It's a solid product at a low price.

Super Cub, Saturday, 25 April 2009 20:31 (sixteen years ago)

Another noob Q: What do you think a shop should or would charge for rebuilding a damanged 3-speed wheel, if the hub were supplied? Including rim, spokes, and labor, and anything else I'm missing...? Answers appreciated b/c right now a shop that I like is fixing to charge me $120 to replace a rear wheel w internally geared hub that wasn't damaged when I took it in -- I intended for them to rebuild it but they say it got damaged in the unlacing...?

guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Monday, 27 April 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

if the hub is supplied, it shouldn't cost any more than any other kind of hub. generally $45 for labor, i'd wager, the rest depends on what kind of rim you put on it

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Monday, 27 April 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

A plain old steel rim, I guess. That's what was on there before. What do those run?

guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Monday, 27 April 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

ugh don't get a steel rim, laurel, they weigh a billion pounds. plus i'm not sure if you can even get those anymore??

this is going on yr old---what, raleigh?---right? get something appropriately wide, for sure, but you may as well upgrade to modern technology!

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Monday, 27 April 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

plus braking on steel sucks bad. im thinking $25 cheap rim, $20 cheap spokes, $45 labor's about right, all retail. if theres a bit of fiddling required to get the shifting right, add $15 maaaybe. its not outrageous, but not a good deal either imo.

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Monday, 27 April 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

It's going on my 1967 Something or other made entirely of steel already. Plus the shop asst said they had to replace the shifter, too, because it wasn't compatible w the new hub...which means they just threw away my Sturmey-Archer and replaced it w a Shimano.

guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Monday, 27 April 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

i am so lost on this thread but i will study it closely and make a wise decision

~*GAME 2 SNYPA*~ (omar little), Monday, 27 April 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

Actually I prefer the Shimano, but this is all costing more than just rebuilding my wheel, and no one EVER called me to say any problems had come up, or to authorize the new costs.

guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Monday, 27 April 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

http://images.burningman.com/gallery/netmoser.10183.jpg

~*GAME 2 SNYPA*~ (omar little), Monday, 27 April 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

omar just search "gbx" and take all my advice because clearly it is the best

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Monday, 27 April 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

^he is a future doctor

Super Cub, Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:31 (sixteen years ago)

and if there's one thing doctors know about, it's about owning hell of nice bikes and not really being fit enough to ride them properly

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)

wait, that's lawyers

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)

no, i mean, ~~~orthodontists~~~

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)

Okay so apparently a new 3-spd wheel + hub runs around $150. That means the guy offering me $100 for new wheel & shifters is giving me a good deal. He gets to keep my good hub and wait for the correct size of wheel to come through his shop, and then sell it to someone else, so he's probably coming about even. But it works for me.

This is reassuring, b/c the shop is one that I rly like and I like the owners -- they've been helpful and friendly to me over the years, even when I was a dum noob. I would hate to think the level of service was going down, b/c I like recommending them to people.

guys i need to eliminate this business associate and im really nervous (Laurel), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)

That sounds like a fair deal all round. I am building my GF a second bike over the summer, for chicago and I was going to go with three speed and maybe build the wheel myself from parts at awesome bike store, kraynicks. Fantastic guy, has a free to use workshop, only pay for the parts and any labour he puts in. Has the most fantastic treasure trove of salvaged parts.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 28 April 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

thinking of retiring the old nail and getting a nice practical bike around town - anybody here tried a trek allant?

juniper jazz (haitch), Sunday, 3 May 2009 14:19 (sixteen years ago)

Not tried one, however the portland and valencia models in the same urban range look a little lighter although trek doesn't put this information on their site who who knows.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Sunday, 3 May 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)

where in london can i buy myself a pretty helmet that would fit my head? i mail ordered a "one size fit all" one and of course my head is too ridiculously large for it. finsbury cycle came to the same conclusion (although to be fair they only had 2 helmets for me to try)

i kind of want a skate style one as the shaved hedgehog style ones all look hella lame.

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:00 (sixteen years ago)

Ken you should try Bikefix on Lamb's Conduit Street, they have this (according to their website anyway):

The classic and popular skate/bmx helmet allows you aggressive riding while you feel absolutely safe. Featured with 13 head-cooling air vents, brushed cotton insulation and exchangeable pads, this is by far the best fitting, most comfortable and safest skate helmet at this price level. L/XL Only. Matt black (other colours and sizes are available to order).
£25.00

http://www.bikefix.co.uk/i/tsg_mattblk.jpg

Stryder's on the Orme (j.o.n.a), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:08 (sixteen years ago)

OMG THAT SOUNDS PERFECT. i want to ride aggressively and my head apparently is XL and it's available in black!!!!!!!!!!!11111

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:24 (sixteen years ago)

If you have a bigger head than that then Giro make the biggest helmet on the market.

Prince of Persia (Ed), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 11:55 (sixteen years ago)

OMG I want one too! Cycling home through elephant and castle last night without one, I genuinely feared death.

N1ck (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 12:33 (sixteen years ago)

ok i got a different make but v. similar looking one from bikefix now. they taunted me though by having an amazing BEIGE one on display but when i asked for one in a box they only had black, but i was happy with a black one anyway.

then i asked for a bag and they only had a bag that would fit the helmet only and not the box, should really have just then taken the beige one but by that stage i was feeling the vibe that they were a bit too 1337 to want to cater for my n00b helmet needs.

i've got an awesome black helmet though so yay!

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)

interestingly enough, the one that fitted me was a medium.. (it's slightly snug but thought it's better to have that than one that's loose???)

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)

save-a-fred

cutty, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)

allows you aggressive riding while you feel absolutely safe

Yeah, you may feel absolutely safe, but you aren't.

I don't get the appeal of the BMX helmets. Aren't they substantially hotter? IMHO they look really clunky and awkward.

Super Cub, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

i agree

cutty, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

they are substantially hotter yes, i guess that's the appeal?

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Wednesday, 13 May 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

Why did my brand new inner tube burst on inflating, before I reached the recommended 100psi? Thought it might be a pinch flat but it happened right on the inside seam. Just bad luck?

Pro Creationism Soccer 2009 (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 06:53 (sixteen years ago)

could still be a pinch flat, but check your rim to see if there's any tube killing nasties jutting out, and rim tape and make sure that it's properly set (and replace if worn). i've managed to avoid pinch flats by installing tires having the tubes inflated to about 20psi. a couple people i know also pump the tire up about half way, then deflate, then inflate fully. something about stretching out the tube.

the stone that clings (clingstone), Thursday, 14 May 2009 07:45 (sixteen years ago)

[inspects mental image of wheels] huh I don't think they have any rim tape. That'll be it then.

Pro Creationism Soccer 2009 (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 07:49 (sixteen years ago)

Is there some kind of machine that will fit inner tubes? Fuck is it difficult and annoying.

massive dynamic lady (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

are you inflating the tube a bit (then close the nozzle) to fit it on the wheel? then deflate it once it's seated on the rim to get the tire mounted

cutty, Thursday, 14 May 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

you mean don't mount the tyre at all before the tube's on? i half mount tire (one rim i mean) then part inflate tube then fit under tire then fit other tyre rim. no deflating. mainly what i did wrong last time was not religously fit it round from the nozzle and i ended up with a bit of tube stickign out, like the whole thing was too long. worked better the second time around. seating the last few inches of the tyre is still a bitch though.

massive dynamic lady (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

ow my thumbs

massive dynamic lady (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

no, sounds like you are doing it right.

did you deflate tire when trying to seat? some brands of tire are harder to mount than others. michelin pro 3s for example.

cutty, Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

didn't deflate. have now, definitely easier!

massive dynamic lady (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

you are one step close to no longer being a noob!

cutty, Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

one step along the endless road!

massive dynamic lady (ledge), Thursday, 14 May 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

I have never been a cycling enthusiast prior to the past few months (save for a summer of downhill mountain biking in Colorado in '96), but am rapidly becoming one, first our of necessity (car went kaput; could stand to lose some weight), but now stemming primarily from a newfound love of road bikes/road bike riding. Srsly, where have skinny tires been all my life?

My first road bike (I'm already dreaming of/making plans for the second), purchased last month, is a pristinely maintained 1976 Flandria racing bike, which has been modified somewhat for more general use. It flies & I love it! I've decided to take it on a several-leg trip in southern Michigan, which I am currently training for by taking progressively longer day trips.

Also, I am gearing up on accessories, which brings me to posit a query: I bought a near-mint 1980s Bell V-1 Pro helmet (with red & blue racing stripes!) at a garage sale recently. The plastic and foam appear to be completely unscathed/untested, but I was wondering if it is wise to entrust my safety to such an old piece of equipment. I love to rock the vintage (nice fit with the bike, too), but if foam degrades over time, or some such thing, perhaps I should keep it for style-exclusive use & keep shopping for something more recent for daily use?

Nice to join you over here ate ILTRMB.

"alt-black" (Pillbox), Saturday, 23 May 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

welcome. a vintage bell v-1 pro should be fine since "foam" is actually concrete

(i dunno if safe or not)

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)

i wouldn't

cutty, Saturday, 23 May 2009 23:56 (sixteen years ago)

(and welcome!)

cutty, Saturday, 23 May 2009 23:56 (sixteen years ago)

We all hope to never actually use our helmets, but if I did need its services, I certainly wouldn't want it to be 25 years old.

Also, the general recommendation is to go and try on a few helmets to find one that fits well and feels comfortable. Heads and helmets both come in a variety of sizes and shapes.

So, I vote no on the used helmet. Helmets now are much better than their forefathers anyways. Lighter, better ventilated, better fitting. I'm all for retro, but helmets seem like a good place to draw the line.

Welcome!

Super Cub, Sunday, 24 May 2009 01:01 (sixteen years ago)

fave bell v1 feature: microscopic sliding ventilation port

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Sunday, 24 May 2009 01:18 (sixteen years ago)

this is a rather rough snarky welcome coming from me but WE ARE TRYING TO SAVE YOUR LIFE :)

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Sunday, 24 May 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)

Looking some more at singlespeeds, and one of the local bike shops had a brand new SE 700c Lager for $600 (no sales tax) that fits well, has all the little things I like, and seems, at least, as light and carry-up-my-stairs-able as I'm going to get in this price range. However, if I go with it, I'm going to have to wait a few weeks until I can afford it. They had the next step down, (forget what it was called) for $300, which I could get pretty soon (soooo nice out) but it seemed a tad too heavy, and not exactly a good long term investment.

Should I wait for the lighter, likely longer lasting bike? And also, are either even a good bike at all, and am I beeing hoodwinked by the salesman's beardo charms?

en i see kay, Sunday, 24 May 2009 01:42 (sixteen years ago)

I've heard VERY VERY bad things about those SE Drafts. The wheels that come with them are apparently terrible. The higher level bikes from them (like that Lager) are supposedly good though.

sous les paves, Sunday, 24 May 2009 02:43 (sixteen years ago)

Okay, so, think I'm down to:

http://bikesdirect.com/products/dawes/sst.htm

vs.

http://www.sebikes.com/Singlespeed/700cLagerWhite.aspx

the later, from a local shop for $600.

I looked at the specs closely... these are almost exactly the same bike, right? Like, the brake configuration is the only difference I could find.

en i see kay, Sunday, 24 May 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)

SE bikes don't get a lot of respect and are often considered POS. I don't know if that's a warranted reputation, but that's my perception. It's true though that Bikes Direct bikes often closely correspond to name brand bikes. The BD bikes are built in the same factory in Taiwan using the same tubing and same geometry as some brand name bike. While the frame maybe basically the same, the components might be different and vary somewhat in quality. The skill of the wrenching when putting the bike together can vary a lot too obviously.

Bikes Direct has a decent reputation and their bikes are a good deal, but like any budget enterprise, you assume a certain risk of hassle and problems. you don't get the security of having a shop backing up the product. Most people seem to have good experiences with them based on my reading of bike forums, but it's definitely a budget operation.

If you're willing to spend $600, there are other bikes to consider. Have you considered other options? If you are willing to go up to 700, then lots of possibilities open up.

Super Cub, Sunday, 24 May 2009 06:55 (sixteen years ago)

How about an IRO?

http://www.irocycle.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=153

Also, I think the Fuji Track is the same frame as the SE Lager and is cheaper. It's a good option if you want to buy from a shop and be frugal.

You could also check out Surly Steamroller, Kona Paddy Wagon, and Raleigh Rush Hour. These are more expensive, but you might be able to find a deal on 09's. There are other possibilities too.

Super Cub, Sunday, 24 May 2009 07:11 (sixteen years ago)

Well I shopped around to a lot of local shops, but the single speed options I found very lacking. I'm defitnitely open to any suggestions, my main requirements being a chromoly frame (or I suppose any material that'll keep it that light), bullhorn handlebars, front/back breaks, and a flip-flop hub.

I could go up to $700, but anything over $350 will mean I have to wait another pay cycle to get on a bike, and the weather is just so perfect right now.

Thanks for the advice, btw.

en i see kay, Sunday, 24 May 2009 07:14 (sixteen years ago)

Okay how much time/learning curve is involved in buying parts and assembling w/ the help of a friendly co-op or somesuch? Because jesus christ between the brand loyalty and all the weird bike culture politics buying a complete for less than $1000 from an LBS seems extremely fraught. I've been to 11 shops and the only place I could actually find what I was looking for had a Steamroller that, after the bullhorn and the pedals, would be $810.

en i see kay, Wednesday, 27 May 2009 02:49 (sixteen years ago)

fwiw, learning to diy probably won't get you a bike more cheaply (such is the nature of completes), but actually learning the skills necessary to do so probably wouldn't take long. i took a course in chicago that had you dis- and reassemble your bike over the course of eight weeks, once a week. the actual instructive part of that, however, could be greatly compressed, esp if you're working one on one with a knowledgeable friend or something

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)

i really wish i'd assembled my last bike, but the deal i got on the complete was so good that it seemed like i'd be able to customize as needed and still come in cheaply. of course, once i actually ~got~ the thing, and rode it, it has seemed indulgent to swap out serviceable parts w/o them wearing out or whatever. but that might just be a personal tic, you know

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 27 May 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)

ok i got a bike! it's great, and my ass is killing me.

but i need to think maintenance. so a) what should be in an essential tool kit and b) what are the best ways to pick up the basic skills, recommended books? take a class?

Swat Valley High (goole), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

Depends on how you prefer to learn, I reckon. There's all the info you'd need on the web - I just checked sheldonbrown.com to remind myself which way to turn the spring-tightening screw on v-brakes. I've never bought a book or taken a class, although I do have friends who are far bike geekier than I'll ever be, which is handy.

man saves ducklings from (ledge), Thursday, 28 May 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)

As for tools, the handy sized multi tools with a bunch of allen keys and screwdrivers are indispensable. And get a track pump.

man saves ducklings from (ledge), Thursday, 28 May 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

goofe---i'm happy to help w/anything you need, as far as minor maintenance and stuff is concerned.

as for a tool kit: get something small enough to either keep attached to the bike (saddlebag) or that you don't mind carrying with you. i ~don't~ do this because my shit's in my messenger bag, but then i end up being that guy with the messenger bag and it's sort of embarrassing.

i'm guessing that, with the bike you've got, you'll need

a 15mm wrench for the bolts on your hubs (unless they're quick-release), this can also double as a pedal wrench
allen keys for seatpost, stem, saddle adjustments
*tire levers*
*tube(s)*
*some kind of small CO2 pump w/charges*
*one of those presta-->schraeder adapters, so you can fill up at the gas station if need be

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)

really you just need stuff to get you home, which usually means a flat kit

it could also mean chain-breaker (cheap, small) and allen keys. i keep my stuff in one of these now: http://reloadbags.com/site_images/ACCESSORIES_protoolrolled400.jpg
http://reloadbags.com/site_images/ACCESSORIES_tn_protoolopened112.jpg

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

I'm a big fan of Sheldon Brown, the parktool.com site, and my Crank Brothers Multi 19 which has a ridiculous number of allen wrenches plus chain breaker and spoke wrenches and such and stays in my saddle bag. For routine maintenance at home I have a three-prong 4, 5, and 6mm Park allen wrench that I use constantly.

Buy or borrow other weird tools (crank pullers, pedal wrenches, headset wrenches, bottom bracket tools, etc.) as needed.

joygoat, Friday, 29 May 2009 05:03 (sixteen years ago)

I noticed the other day that my fixie has allen key bolts on its hubs - is this normal? I haven't had to take one off yet but I am considering changing tyres. I also need to learn how to put the back wheel back on so the chain tension is still good :/

Mark C, Friday, 29 May 2009 10:18 (sixteen years ago)

I just kind of... pull it tight, ya know? Not too tight though. Some guy I read says he gets the chain tight ignoring wheel centreing, tightens the right (drive side) nut, then centres and tightens the left nut.

I get a fair bit of chain noise on mine, dunno if this is due to the chain or cogs or my shitty tensioning technique.

man saves ducklings from (ledge), Friday, 29 May 2009 10:45 (sixteen years ago)

think it has allen bolts because yr hubs are nice phil woods, right??

trick i use for putting the wheel back in w/appropriate tension:
-- bike upside down
-- if yr right-handed (as i am), position the bike so that the rear wheel is to the right, and the drivetrain is facing you
-- take yr left hand push the rear wheel as far back as the chain allows, bracing the butt of yr hand against the BB shell
-- you can do that off-center stuff, if you want, but i just center it.
-- tighten down the bolts equally on each side. best way is to alternate back and forth between bolts as you tighten. so, 1/4 turn rt, 1/4 turn left, so on

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Friday, 29 May 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

Brilliant - thanks gbx (yes, they are nice Phil Woods). The guy who built my bike got the spoke tension and chain position spot on - no noise at all, which will no doubt not be the case once I have to make adjustments.

Mark C, Friday, 29 May 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

i need to get better at getting my foot in the facking toe clip quickly when i go off a green light...

Swat Valley High (goole), Friday, 29 May 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Anyone wanna recommend me a step by step on how to replace a broken pair of ye olde ten-speed stem-mounted friction shifters with another pair of the same? I hit my local bike shop for the gear just as they were closing (4:30 on a Saturday?) & was pretty much rushed out the door & now I've got this pair of shift levers & a burning desire for some DIY action (yeah, I'm the dude you heard about who replaced his own broken axle last week). This seems a bit more daunting, though, even though this time there probably won't be an unexpected cache of loose ball bearings to spill all over my bedroom floor.

And yes I've already extensively consulted the www, but to no avail. Lots of tips out there on how to upgrade, but not much advice on how to replace outdated technology with more of the same outdated technology. If you know of a hidden trove of such information, please hook a brother up.

happy cycling!

Pillbox, Saturday, 25 July 2009 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

note to self: need to invest in a decent pair of tin-snips.

Pillbox, Sunday, 26 July 2009 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

what i need right now is SHORTS KNOWLEDGE.

internet chatter suggests that pearl izumi and sugoi make good products at lower price-points. other brands are either disputed in quality, or obviously on a high-end tip.

since the chance of me wearing lycra out in the open air with people around is very low, there is also the liner short option. one i found that looks intersting is here: http://www.mec.ca/Products/product_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524442626847&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302692435&bmUID=1248719495418

suggestions? tips?

goole, Monday, 27 July 2009 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

I've been happy with my regular cheapo Pearl Izumu shorts. Plus you can just wear them under regular shorts and have the option of wearing them on their own.

joygoat, Monday, 27 July 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Belt drive c/d

carne asada, Monday, 27 July 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

C I think. I'm not sure I can see a downside.

Mark C, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

i agree pearl izumi is not offensive

cutty, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 01:42 (fifteen years ago)

Just yes or no for question one, and you can guess:

So I need a freewheel puller or some shit to take my back hub off? Because these wrenches aren't working.

Also, I changed the bearings out on my front wheel and it seems alright. Not as quiet as I'd like it to be while spinning, but better than before. I bought white lithium grease instead of that red grease, though, because Ace didn't have any. Is this grease going to break down faster? Maybe I'll change it out again in a few weeks.

And what do you use to break the old grease up? Some agent plus some kind of extra-bristly pipe cleaner?

Do you use special bearings or are regular one okay? I checked Shimano to see what size to buy, but I just wonder if I need some kind of high performance bearings.

And I'm not sure I even want to fuck with the central hub. Is it so complicated that I should let a bike shop do it? We have a very competitively-priced shop downtown, so maybe it'd be worth it.

bamcquern, Sunday, 2 August 2009 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

Gosh, I was so ridiculous in the garage tonight. Definitely did not look like an old hand at bike repair. At one point when I couldn't find a hose I had my wheel in the shower with me with the massage setting on to get some gunk out of the hub. I tried to get all the tools I thought I'd need at Ace, but I didn't have my bases covered.

bamcquern, Sunday, 2 August 2009 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

So, I tend to go through a lot of tubes & was wondering if it would be worthwhile to invest in tube which claim to be more durable (the Slime brand or others) or if I should just be resigned to having a repair kit on me when I go for rides. Here is the deal: I am a big dude (6.3 @ around 200 lbs. even when I am in great shape) & I ride a road bike. The terrain in my town is pretty rough (even the "bike lanes" & paved trails are riddled w/ cracks, holes & ledges at road/sidewalk intersections). Plus, I'm putting in an average of 15-20 miles a day. Most of my blown tubes are a result of general wear & tear, hitting patchy surfaces at high speeds & such, and not a result of punctures from debris. I end up having to replace about one tube a week. Could I save time/cash by going with "premium" tubes (the ones I get at my local shop are your average $4 basic tubes)?

ex-juggalist (Pillbox), Monday, 3 August 2009 01:43 (fifteen years ago)

Check your tyres and rim tape first.

Rim tape: make sure all of the spoke holes are covered, that there aren't any rucks or bumps, or any undue grit sticking to it.

Tyres: make sure there aren't any holes or splits the tube might be getting pinched by. Make sure you are running an appropriate pressure. Make sure your tube is the right size or the tyre size.

What size tyres are you running? it could be the tyres rather than the type of tube. when we first came to Pittsburgh E had 23s (admittedly very old ones) and they kept flatting on the potholed streets around here, we changed her up to some 32s (with kevlar lining ) and we haven't had a problem since.

I tend to think that there is something else going on if you are getting a lot of flats and having examined some dead tubes from this kind of environment a fair few of the holes would not have been fixed by slime. I do like slime although it can be a bit of a pain with presta valves sometimes.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 3 August 2009 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks Ed. I ride 27" rims @ 1.1/8" width tires. Here's the thing though: the only 27s they have at my local shop are 1.1/4" width. They told me it doesn't really make any difference, but maybe they are lying to me? If you are speaking of a different size issue than the general rim size/tire width, you will have to clarify b/c I am not that technically hip yet.

Pretty sure it's not the rims or the tape, though I'll double check. Since I bought the bike, I've replaced both rims & have had the same frequency of occurrence w/ all four.

At the very least, I'm going to look into ordering a stash of 27"x1.1/8" tubes b/c I don't know if I'll be able to find them around here.

ex-juggalist (Pillbox), Monday, 3 August 2009 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

1 1/8 and 1 1/4 will be very similar - they're not lying to you. The 1 1/4 will be slightly more comfortable on the bad surfaces.

Are you underinflating the tyres? They should have a min and max inflation on the sidewall. If you're underinflating you'll get a lot of [inch flats which sounds like what might be happening. As you're a bigger chap, make sure you inflate closer to the maximum. If you don't have a pump with a psi gauge, ask your local shop to do it for you and at least pinch the tyre afterwards so you have a ballpark idea of how firm it should be. If you don't already have a floor pump with a gauge, I'd strongly advise you get one.

It's very unlikely stronger tubes will make much of a difference, I don't think. If the problem isn't underinflation, then you could just have tyres that are easily pierced (even if it's not obvious this is what's happening). If so, it might be worth ordering some tyres online, if your local shop doesn't have them - there are plenty that focus on puncture protection, though most of these will be heavier and slower as a result.

The reason Ed suggests the rims or tape is because if you're not suffering pinch flats or puncture flats, then the only realistic third option is a jagged corner of a rim or spoke or valve hole. It is worth checking that your rim tape covers everything, and that your rims don't have any sharp or chipped areas. It's also very possible for a sharp to get inside the tyre and puncture from within, so clean both the inside of the rim and the inside of the tyre before putting the tube and tyre back on.

Mark C, Monday, 3 August 2009 10:44 (fifteen years ago)

I am a big fan of these rather than replacing the tube every time.

http://www.parktool.com/images/products/productimages/det_GP-2v2_2005727_24456.jpg

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 3 August 2009 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

Bam, re your hub questions, sorry I'm late but I have some thoughts. You should prob swap out the White Lightning and get some real grease -- I tried WL once b/c it was the only kind avail at my local hardware store, but it really doesn't have the body of bike grease, and you want a thick paste for the long haul.

To get the old stuff off, a lot of people use Simple Green, or there are other degreasers on the market. You can use WD40, I guess, but it's sneaky because it will kill and cut through old grease and just leave a light film of its own behind but it is NOT enough for things that move a lot, like hubs, or anything really. Prob don't use WD40 as a lubricant anywhere on your bike.

Frankly you can use a dishsoap solution and wash your parts in the sink if you get them really really rinsed afterward and pack them with good grease. Don't drop any bearings down the drain -- helps to do your scrubbing over a sheet pan or piece of tupperware in case you drop anything.

Someone -- Hunter? -- around here likes WL, if I recall. But it seems like not an awesome idea to me.

Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Monday, 3 August 2009 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

Pedro's do this great degreaser call orang peelz which seems to be more effective than anything else I have tried. Using WD-40 almost like spray air is pretty effective too.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 3 August 2009 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

It's a legit grease with a thick, generous helping of petroleum jelly, just not the usual compound for a hub. It's a grease used for bearings (boats and lawnmowers and things like that). I got some 3-in-1 lube for my chain that's about as viscous as White Lighting. After I did my front wheel, I discovered that my brother has bike grease in a drawer in his garage, which remains unexplained to me since he rarely rides his bike and probably would not fiddle with anything requiring it.

So . . . I have a quick release for the back hub and I stripped the plastic part from the nut and can't tighten it or get it off my axle. I may need a new axle, I dunno, but I definitely need a new nut (and whatever that Shimano part is called to get the back hub off. My records show that it's a freewheel adapter or puller or something).

Thanks for the tips about Simple Green and such! I may end up buying that freewheel adapter and doing the rear hub like I did the front, but I want the crank sqeaky clean now, too, because I have envy of all the speedy road bikers and fixie dudes riding around campus now that school's about to start. This ultimately may force me to pay for labor at a bike store.

(I had to ride the ugliest, heaviest beheamoth of a backup bike to get to school today.)

bamcquern, Monday, 3 August 2009 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

There are more special tools req'd for getting the bottom bracket apart but maybe on new bikes that's easier. I can't remember, I haven't done any work in a long time. You prob still need a crank-puller at the very least.

Re lube, okay! The WL that I bought once was too thin, and came in a tube. It said it was for stuff like bearings but it was way thinner than the colored paste from the bike shop and I didn't trust it.

I did that once to a quick-release hub. I'd never had one until I inherited a used bike with them, then got a flat, then tried to deal w it on the side of the road and ended up fucking it up. Got rid of the bike soon after, so no idea what the fix was.

Like most people my age, I am 33 (Laurel), Monday, 3 August 2009 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

xpost to Ed & Mark C: Thanks again for the input. I bought new rims recently & upon investigation, it seems my tires were riding a little closer to the new rims, resulting in some abrasion on the front tire from my brake pad, which must have eventually worn a hole through the tire, so there you go. Replaced tire today & adjusted front brake, so hopefully I will be good to go for the time being (but I ordered a frame pack & a road pump today for whatever complications inevitably lie ahead).

ex-juggalist (Pillbox), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

I have an early '70s Peugeot UO-8 (w/ mostly upgraded components), and for some reason, the fixed cup keeps coming loose. I took off the crank and tightened it flush so that it wouldn't turn anymore, but after only 16 miles, it's abt. a half-centimeter out. Other than Loctite, is there a better solution?

naus, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 09:52 (fifteen years ago)

i'd like to pimp El Duke Degreaser: made in Chicago, all-organic/biodegradeable, really effective

ovum if you got 'em (gbx), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 12:46 (fifteen years ago)

Was going to post for the first time yesterday on the 'daily bicycle log' thread, wondering how comes people seemed to get so many punctures - I've had my Gary Fisher for eight years now, cycling all over London, and never had one. You can guess what happened this morning then...

Anyway, I'm looking to move on from my battered mountain bike and get something a little lighter. My cousin-in-law gets an amazing deal on Merida bikes (http://www2.merida-bikes.com/en_INT/Bikes.Overview) so I'm going to get something from them. Like I said, I need something lighter (after borrowing a friend's road bike I can't believe what I've been lugging around all these years) but I take the canal path most days and I need something that'll handle broken paving stones, occasional grassy/muddy patches and the odd kerb or two. He's recommending a Cyclo-Cross bike. Any one tried them? In general or Merida specifically? Am I going to end up with punctures/buckled wheels?

Oz, Thursday, 13 August 2009 09:25 (fifteen years ago)

A CX bike sounds like a great idea. In an ideal world you'd have either slick tyres or, better still, lighter wheels shod in slick tyres that you could put on when doing longer road rides, while keeping the wider knobblier ones for the towpath.

Merida are fine bikes - they're one of the biggest frame manufacturers in the world - them and Giant, I think? - but they mostly make the frames for other brands. The bikes are solid, well priced and well specced.

Some CX bikes come with rack and mudguard mounts and some don't, so make sure if you do want the option, you make sure they do (there are bodges so it's not the end of the world if not, though).

Mark C, Thursday, 13 August 2009 09:44 (fifteen years ago)

Here's a 2008 review of a Merida crosser.

Mark C, Thursday, 13 August 2009 09:53 (fifteen years ago)

I guess while I'm noobying - whither toeclips? Never used them before but the the Merida bikes let you choose the pedals. So do I want straps? Those things that clip into special shoes? Remember I'm a central London rider so it's rare I go more than 100 yards without having to stop.

Oz, Thursday, 13 August 2009 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

I have clipless pedals (Crank Bros Eggbeaters) on my roadie and toeclips on my fixie. The only benefit of the latter is that you can wear normal shoes with them (though I've found some shapes of shoes don't really work - and smart shoes would quickly get scuffed I expect).

Clipless pedals - where the shoe attaches in some way via a cleat - are much more efficient and secure than basic flat pedals, with MTB clipless being best suited to commuting use as the shoes all come with recessed cleats so you can walk in them with no problem.

The reason I use Eggbeaters is because they look cool, they're light, they fit MTB shoes, and most importantly, they have a 4-way clip-in mechanism, unlike other systems which either have one-sided or two-sided - so you're always flipping pedals. With the Eggbeaters, you simply press down on the pedal and no matter what orientation it is, you always clip in.

http://www.mtbbritain.co.uk/images/eggbeaters_pedals.jpg

Mark C, Thursday, 13 August 2009 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

plus you can clip in backwards, great if you miss it the first time.

if you don't mind shelling out on another pair of shoes then clipless pedals are a+++ classic (apart from the stupid name). you can also get dual sided pedals (clip on one side, normal on t'other) if you think you might want to ride in normal shoes sometimes.

ledge, Thursday, 13 August 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

I'm a big fan of toeclips, but I've never used clipless. Also I'm sort of a lazy mid-level cyclist with no impulse to be especially modern, fast, or tricksy, so you probably want to listen to the boys more than to me.

But it's nice to be able to switch the pressure off the balls of your feet and pull up, I think. My toes frequently go numb on my platform pedals that don't have clips.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

Also I'm cheap, and I've had one bike stolen and one bike vandalized so badly it had to be trashed, so I'm not big on sinking money into any more of 'em.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

on no evidence i have the intuitive feeling that clipless pedals might make your bike slightly less theft-prone cos the thief will not want to ride off on it. maybe that's naive.

goole, Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

gbx does have a story of leaving his bike unlocked in the front yard and it being gone the next day...but calling around and finding it had been dropped off at or near a local bikeshop and left for "dead", presumably b/c the thief was unable to ride a fixie with eggbeaters. Not as much fun as you thought, hmm?

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

I, er, just told the story for him. Sorry.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Thursday, 13 August 2009 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

it had been bailed less than a block from the site of it's theft on BOTH occasions :/ due to the whole brakeless and clipless thing. Probably more the former than the latter that really a Ted as the deterrant tho

ovum if you got 'em (gbx), Friday, 14 August 2009 10:20 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

Is leaving my bike out in the rain w/out seat post - not all the time, just occasionally - a really bad idea? Have noticed some rust coming out on the post already.

this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 08:35 (fifteen years ago)

How valuable is your bike? to yourself or in terms of resale. Obv, interior frame rust is not desirable, but if the alternative would be that you need to leave your vintage Brooks saddle attached to your crap Murray on the sidewalk, or otherwise clutter your tiny studio apt w/ a bike you don't really care much about, then perhaps the interior rust is not such a big deal.

something cuh-ray (Pillbox), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 08:46 (fifteen years ago)

Some kind of rudimentary cap would surely be easy to buy/make?

But yeah, you don't want your steel bike rusting from the inside, Tom.

Mark C, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 09:28 (fifteen years ago)

I'll stick a cork in it.

this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Tuesday, 15 September 2009 09:48 (fifteen years ago)

srsly.

Mark C, Tuesday, 15 September 2009 10:24 (fifteen years ago)

gf is looking to buy a bike; seller says this one can go for £120. anyone know if tht's a good deal? is pash still around?
http://glasgow.gumtree.com/glasgow/18/45665518.html

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

my bike dude says tht's steep and 'u cd be getting any old shit'; the suicide levers are a bad sign

pass

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

That's too much. That bike isn't worth £20 let alone £120.

Alex in SF, Friday, 18 September 2009 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

haha yup

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

what's a good cheap set of bike lights? will anything do?

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

No, because if you get the flea market kind they will break and piss you off. Otherwise, I don't know.

bamcquern, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

£8

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Not an expert, but looks solid. But with shipping, isn't that what you're going to pay at a bike store? The basic ones usually cost about $15 here.

bamcquern, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Even at Wal-Mart.

bamcquern, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

I got lucky once and found a decent one in the hardware section of a Safeway for $5.

bamcquern, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

shipping's free; doubt I'd find anything cheaper in a shop but I'll have a quick look tomorrow

cozwn, Friday, 18 September 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

I got these cute little wrap-around lights that I can attach when needed.

Why do people ride wrong-way in bike lanes? It is very annoying.

Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 23 September 2009 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

Cozen, I have these and they're excellent - worth paying an extra few quid, I assure you.

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Smart_Bspoke_LED_1~2_Watt_Light_Set/5360040003/

Mark C, Thursday, 24 September 2009 09:20 (fifteen years ago)

thanks mark

cozwn, Thursday, 24 September 2009 10:10 (fifteen years ago)

i am trying to research this but running out of time. i have a short window while in the uk at the end of the month to buy a new bike (i can also have one shipped to my uk address and waiting for me).

i used to ride a edinburgh courier and it was fine, but since then i've been through a couple of beaters. i finally have the funds to spend a little, say £500. this is for occasional commuting, but mostly to get fit, see a little of bavaria, etc. i want a bike suitable for both the road and bike paths, so i guess i want a poseur CX or a hybrid with drops. the trek portland is out of my range, but something like that? kona jake would still be a stretch, but more like it. revolution cross is affordable, but i have no idea what i'm looking at. your thoughts?

(tips for 2009 models on offer are particularly welcome, as i am totally fine with that.)

caek, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

sure someone else more qualified will be along in a second but bikes I've been looking at in tht price range (which are all highly recommended on bikeradar) are the trek 1.2, 2008 boardman comp, merida road ride 880-24, decathlon b'twin sport 2, or giant scr 3/2

cozwn, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

^these are all road bikes w/drops btw

cozwn, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

i knew i'd seen you posting some leads but i couldn't find the thread. thanks!

caek, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

i don't necessarily have a problem with a true road race bike, but i'm a bit out of practice to should perhaps be thinking of something with slightly gentler handling and more comfortable ride.

caek, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

another of my own noob qns: can someone pls explain to me fixed gear bicycles? what are the benefits to running one of these (esp. in a country w/a hill every 300 yds). the clean lines are beautiful but aren't they a chore? (is tht part of the allure? there's no 'slack', as it were)

cozwn, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

I have no interest in getting one of these^ btw I'm just curious of the appeal

cozwn, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

the only benefit, imo, is less maintenance and upkeep with gears/derailleur adjustments

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

the appeal... IT'S ZEN BRO IT'S A LIFESTYLE ETC

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

fuck a lifestyle imo but it is really fun and feels a lot more intuitive.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

meh

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

personally, having GEARS seems more intuitive to me. but what do i know.

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

I don't want to start a fight!!!! I just don't understand... hills. they're hard enough w/gears tbh

cozwn, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

if your locale is hilly, def don't go fixed

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

Honestly, I live in a low-moderately hilly city, and hills were a bit difficult for the first couple weeks, then I just stopped noticing.

And cutty and I (from what I understand) have completely different goals with our bikes, so it's totally understandable and doesn't need to be a fight that we're not gonna feel the same way about such things.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

I mean I smoke sometimes while riding my bike ffs. I'm not exactly going for optimal performance.

ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

i rode a brakeless fixed gear/track bike for 5 years though

consider me now part of fixed gear anonymous

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

uh, i made the mistake of vaporizing before my hard workout this AM. never again unless it's an easy ride.

cutty, Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

The major benefit of singlespeed/fixed is the total ease of doing everything (from leaving the house, riding, maintenence--it's basically the perfect bike if you don't want to think about anything except for getting from Point A to Point B) except getting up really steep hills.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 October 2009 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

i'll rep for shimano internal hub if you want gears with low maintenance. and dont care about weight/drivetrain efficiency.

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 October 2009 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

i dream of a CX bike with some magical ultralight rohloff hub and a decent shifter

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

i dream of rohloff hub that is not twice as expensive as my bike.

anybody looking to find cheap bike stuff should come to denver veloswap in 3 weeks. ive not been for a few years, but i think im gonna look for a mtb this year.

iro with the brown bag (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 October 2009 23:56 (fifteen years ago)

I think I'm going to bid on that merida I was watching on ebay :D

cozwn, Friday, 2 October 2009 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

Is this blog as idiotic as I think it is?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/green-living-blog/2009/oct/01/riding-buses

Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Friday, 2 October 2009 12:38 (fifteen years ago)

i was an "urban cyclist" from the age of 12. it's not some big fucken exciting thing. have never experienced slipstream though so maybe i have been missing out on something that sounds dangerous and smelly.

history mayne, Friday, 2 October 2009 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

Fixed gear bikes are good training as you can't just reduce effort by changing gears whenever you fancy it. You're stuck with hills, moving away from traffic lights, and always pedalling whether you like it or not, which builds muscle strength and aids fitness.

Mark C, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ i can get behind that. i think my time spent on a track bike before i ever was on a road bike really helped my pedal stroke and strength.

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 13:45 (fifteen years ago)

ditto: i haven't ridden fixed for months now, but when i was all fixed all the time i was ~strong

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

also, they are great for hill-climbing (vs SS freewheel)

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

really? i guess cos your forward motion pushes the pedals on the upstroke, or something?

goole, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

depending on the gearing, i would have to disagree with gbx (with mad respect of course) that fixed gears are great for hill-climbing.

maybe a "hill" that's like a quarter mile long, but for any real climbing you need to have some gears.

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

i think gbx meant fixed is good for climbing compared to S/S, not compared to gears?

caek, Friday, 2 October 2009 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ this is what i meant!

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

cf super-specialized $$$$ longs peak carbon climbing bike that's like a 10lb carbon fixed gear

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.rbaction.net/fly.aspx?layout=content&taxid=96&cid=165

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

so is the advantage of fixed vs. S/S that you can't coast which, assuming you can handle it, encourages more efficient climbing cadence? or is that the girls in the stripy tops and the 60s glasses want to go to town with you more?

caek, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

oh a link

caek, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

it's a more efficient cadence, maybe, but also it just feels like the bike is "helping."

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

i dont think it's efficient. it's not easier, and you probably waste more energy. it just makes you stronger to climb hills on a fixed gear.

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

strength building workout on the road bike would entail low RPM (30-40RPMs) hill climbing. a fixed gear forces you to do this.

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

thats just like yr opinion, ~man

xp

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

however, whether you're on a road bike OR a fixed gear, you aren't coasting up a hill at all. you'll just stop.

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

it's not an opinion. it's fact. climbing efficiency is achieved by high RPM cadence, slow twitch muscles.

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

when you slog it in a high gear, low cadence (probably out of the saddle) you are using fast twitch muscles, not efficient in the long run

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

i am talking about the drivetrain, tho, not the cadence. that bike i linked is fixed for a reason, and i don't think it's just to drop a few more grams. climbing actually 'feels' easier to me on a fixed than on a similarly geared freewheel, but maybe that's all in MY BRANE

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's in your brain

the drivetrain is affected by your cadence is it not?

cutty, Friday, 2 October 2009 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

that thing is probably geared close to a granny gear. if you rode that on a descent you'd spin like hell.

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

i just meant the physical nature of the drivetrain (direct) had the effect of making climbing feel easier, like if you wanna rest a bit the pedals keep you going. this is a good thing when u trying to get something asap imo, it never feels sloggy. cadence is just what you do with the drivetrain

w/e at this point, anyhow

xp yes duh u guys it is a $14,000 HILL CLIMBING BIKE with like a string as a brake lever

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

my advice about fixed gears:

it's a very basic simple machine ideal for a fixed course (hey, a velodrome) but has some benefits for flat urban light commuting (minimal, light, low-maintenance).

BUT if you also want to ride for fitness (1 to 4+ hours over varied terrain), i would suggest getting a road bike as the benefits multiply massively with gears.

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

yes, i have had great fun on my uno but the limitations are already starting to bother me.

goole, Friday, 2 October 2009 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

now that it's wet and shitty out, tho, i'm beginning to remember why fixed was nice in bad weather

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that is a good point, positraction is supreme (esp when encountering metal in your commute: plating, grates, light rails, etc)

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

road plates = the devil

THE DUSKY VISITOR APPEALS TO CÆSAR (gbx), Friday, 2 October 2009 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

tell me about UK mail order bike retailers. i know of wiggle, ribble, edinburgh cycles. what am i missing.

normally i would just go to my local, take my time, get properly fitted, etc. (there are a bunch in oxford and j.e. james, the big sheffield indie by my parents), but that is not an option here.

caek, Sunday, 4 October 2009 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/
http://www.merlincycles.co.uk/
http://www.leisurelakesbikes.com/

this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Sunday, 4 October 2009 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

Caek - I bought a bike through Wiggle last year and had no problems. Although, having said that, I got the bike serviced (by a decent local bike shop) after I'd done about 100 miles and they said that it hadn't been set up very well, so I'd make sure you get it properly looked at and adjusted. I've also just ordered another bike from Ribble (about an hour ago), so I can tell you how that goes (in a month or so).

Teh Movable Object (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 4 October 2009 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

thanks guys. am i right in thinking you have to go to a store to get a trek bike?

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

there is a v. glamorous-looking one near me http://www.trekbicyclestore.com/munich/, but no way am i paying € prices.

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.evanscycles.com/ do Treks

Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Monday, 5 October 2009 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

oh hi there: http://www.evanscycles.com/help/international-delivery#collection_point

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

p.s. thanks nick!

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

You should find an appropriate stateside conference to attend.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 5 October 2009 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure I can come up with an excuse until the new year.

Even then, are there any airlines that take bikes free other than BA? How much is it if you do have to pay for it?

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

A LOT

butt sound insanity (gbx), Monday, 5 October 2009 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

lol BA

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

jeremy powers has ideas about how to travel with bikes. be an airport ninja:

http://beta.velonews.com/article/98887/j-pow-s-journal-the-way-of-the-airport-ninja

cutty, Monday, 5 October 2009 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

BA discontinued the free piece of sports equipment recently, but I think it is only as an additional item, I think you can still have it as part of your standard allowance which is two pieces from the states.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 5 October 2009 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i can get by on hand luggage for everything else anyway so that's cool. but nobody else has anything like this, right?

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

no other airlines allow you to carry bikes as part of your allowance, i mean

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

I think that if you can fit the size and weight criteria then it is OK, but I think the bike box is pushing those limits and whereas a few years back they would have let this slide its now rigidly enforced.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 5 October 2009 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

oh hai http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/en/gb/passengerinformation/baggage/sports/cycling.jsp

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

ed, you ride a paddy wagon, right? i had pretty much ruled them out (and the 09 has horrible dorky powdered rims), but they are on offer at evans, which is where i will likely need to go because of their gatwick connect. would you recommend it for a relative noob commuter in a flat area?

caek, Monday, 5 October 2009 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

I have a cross check. Gf has a jake frame with a load of other stuff on it. Someone parks a paddy waggon next to me at school and it looks fine apart from the hipster yellow deep section rims. Kona seem to make dependably solid stuff.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 5 October 2009 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

Hey you guys - is there any easy way (i.e. without removing it) to tell the size of a bottom bracket? Mine is 68mm x ???mm and I have no idea how to find this out, which I need to quite urgently. I've tried searching the web for it (it's a 2008 Focus Cayo Expert) with no joy. Advice appreciated!

Mark C, Thursday, 8 October 2009 10:13 (fifteen years ago)

pay day came and i'm going to the fancy pants trek store and a big retail park place today. probably not buying today, but v soon. good times.

caek, Saturday, 10 October 2009 10:14 (fifteen years ago)

does anyone have any comments on this thing btw: http://www.bike-discount.de/shop/k94/a14313/rps-60-limited.html

caek, Saturday, 10 October 2009 10:33 (fifteen years ago)

the trek store was wow. they kind of lolled when i asked to see the 1.2 (they don't keep stop of such cheap bikes in a place like this: http://www.trekbicyclestore.com/cs_images/stores/munich/home/large/home2.jpg).

but they can get it in if i want it. they can't get the 2010 until january, but they are going to phone round and see if they can find 2009 or even earlier models, perhaps of the 1.7 (which I think is now the 2.3).

they were really nice considering i didn't have €3000 in my pocket. i spent like an hour there with the manager, who spoke really good english, and fitted me properly using their magical electronic video fitting machine. apparently the top of my breastbone is 147.36cm from the ground.

i found the 2008 1.2 (compact crank) at the big retail park place for €555 (RRP of the 2010 version here is €750, so that's not bad). i am kind of one the fence about that. it's only 8-speed at the back (2009/10 are 9-speed), which apparently makes upgrades expensive (it's an all or nothing thing when you start with 8-speed? does that sound right?), and i guess even in a flat place like munich i would want the triple crank with just 8 at the back. i didn't get as good a vibe about the store either. it was bedlam and i couldn't find anyone to ask if they had my frame. on the other hand, i really don't want to wait until january.

caek, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

keep stock

caek, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

i guess upgrades would be expensive because 9-spd is now the standard? so like if you wanted to get a nicer rear derailleur it wouldn't work with an 8spd cassette

butt sound insanity (gbx), Saturday, 10 October 2009 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that is my understanding.

caek, Saturday, 10 October 2009 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

Caek, that Radon looks excellent. I don't know the make but the spec is pretty good, way better than you'd get on all but the most discounted/second hand Treks.

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 09:34 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks. It's a German make, I get the impression kind of like their Raleigh.

caek, Monday, 12 October 2009 09:37 (fifteen years ago)

Ah cool. Well, if you bring it back to the UK at any point it'll seem exotic! Also, I have a German bike (a Focus - strongly advise you look into them, as their aluminium models are probably in your price range) and it's a fantastic and excellent value piece of kit.

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 11:48 (fifteen years ago)

what was your first road bike, mark?

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 12:38 (fifteen years ago)

First ever? A Motobecane back in the mid 80s, then a Holdsworth in 1989 or so which is still in my shed and which I rode on and off until 2005 when I got my Trek. I bought the Focus on C2W in 2008.

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

YOu should rehab that holdsworth as a winter project.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 12 October 2009 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

Keeping the bikes that I ride road-worthy seems to give me enough to worry about! (was truing a wheel before work today)

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

Also I can't get into my shed as the door is jammed shut :)

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

that is a criminal waste of a shed

surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Monday, 12 October 2009 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

sheds are a privilege imo

surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Monday, 12 October 2009 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

Well I own it, so I guess if I want a useless shed that's my right :) But yeah, I would like to get it sorted. Wonder where my drill is...

Mark C, Monday, 12 October 2009 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

I would come and fix your shed, if I were in london. Nothing more manly than a fixing a shed.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 12 October 2009 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

o_O

caek, Monday, 12 October 2009 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

caek, do decathlon have a store in Munich as their road bikes seem to review quite nicely and are well specced for the price it seems?

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

I just posted on the other thread - decathlon are opening a store here next month... what do ppl make of their b'twin sport 1 and 2?

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

sport 1
sport 2

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

by the looks of it, decathlon are in germany, but they don't carry the bikes and the nearest store is a train ride away : (

second opinions on the radon v welcome

caek, Monday, 12 October 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

Both have compact triple chainsets but only the 2 makes it onto the bottom rung of the shimano, the 2 also has carbon seat stays which seems pretty incredible at the price which should make it a smidge lighter and much stiffer at the back end.

The sport 2 looks like a pretty solid entry level road bike. The sport 1 looks a little too cheap to me.

Bike radar really liked the comp 3

http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/category/bikes/road/product/b-twin-comp-3-32122

It is remarkable that they can turn out a Ti/Carbon Ultegra bike for less than £1800.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

thanks ed, I'd imagine there might be some discount to be had over their opening weekend so I'll definitely go have a look

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

I think in that 500quid sort of price bracket the bikes are all much of a muchness, chinese made frame, bottom end shimano, however, bikeradar make a good point about decathlon's buying power.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Monday, 12 October 2009 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

trek also have the 1.1 coming out soon, caek, just to complicate things further

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, but i don't really want to wait until january. i'm calling the trek shop tomorrow to see if there have access to anything in germany in a 58, and if not i think i'm going to get the radon.

caek, Monday, 12 October 2009 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

I hear that

cozwn (webinar), Monday, 12 October 2009 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

and some winter tires. snow in munich tomorrow!

http://students.cup.edu/sac9223/Jerry_Seinfeld.jpg

caek, Monday, 12 October 2009 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

At least you are in the home of schwalbe.

Mornington Crescent (Ed), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 11:36 (fifteen years ago)

am gunna buy this, I think
http://glasgow.gumtree.com/glasgow/90/47250790.html

coz (webinar), Thursday, 15 October 2009 09:47 (fifteen years ago)

payday tomorrow, at which point i drop bank on the radon. good times.

caek, Thursday, 15 October 2009 10:00 (fifteen years ago)

wow, thats a great deal coz.

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 15 October 2009 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

Cozen, I assume you've found out what size it is? I'd totally avoid getting a bike that wasn't at the very most one size removed from your ideal. My Cayo is a 58cm - a 57cm would have been ideal (had they existed) and it's made a difference to both comfort and how I've had to set it up.

Mark C, Thursday, 15 October 2009 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

I'm going to go view it (if the guy ever gets back to me; my parents live in the neighbouring town) so I'll get to see if it fits

what height are you, mark?

coz (webinar), Thursday, 15 October 2009 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

serious blizzard here. not feeling good about riding in weather this.

how do i shot winter cycling in countries with real winters?

caek, Thursday, 15 October 2009 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

it is the best!

a perfect urkel (gbx), Thursday, 15 October 2009 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

it is awesome (ha, Mark C)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3506/3207307598_96c2040137.jpg

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 15 October 2009 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

6 foot, coz, 34" inside leg.

Mark C, Friday, 16 October 2009 12:11 (fifteen years ago)

light, fast, chews hills; motherfucking road bike GET :D:D:D
http://img.skitch.com/20091016-byfaex5itab9a3nhhthi2gxmqf.jpg

coz (webinar), Friday, 16 October 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

got it for £350 in the end; felt a bit churlish haggling over a bike I've seen run double tht on ebay but I'm scottish so whatevs

coz (webinar), Friday, 16 October 2009 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

nice

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 16 October 2009 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

Nice work Coz. What's the full spec? I reckon use that extra £50 to have a pro service as it could be quite knackered if it's been ridden even reasonably hard over the last 4 years. I've done 3500 miles on my Cayo and it shows.

Here's my Cayo, on the day I got it:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3263/2568056649_5fce8b857e.jpg

Mark C, Friday, 16 October 2009 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

frame's a 55, fit is fine and spec is standard: carbon frame, 105 brakes and front derailleur, ultegra shifters and rear derailleur, mavic aksium wheelset. bike looks to be in great condition to my untrained eye and it certainly ran v.well for the 40miles I rode yesterday but will def have a mechanic give it a once over

coz (webinar), Saturday, 17 October 2009 11:22 (fifteen years ago)

lots of badges tho ha

coz (webinar), Saturday, 17 October 2009 11:23 (fifteen years ago)

I hate headsets. Probably done less than 200m on my fixie and already the lower bearings are rusted up. Tried to clean them but steering is still decidedly unsmooth. Think I'll have to get a new one. ?

surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Sunday, 18 October 2009 11:38 (fifteen years ago)

how u guys feel about this kona:

http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Kona_Kapu_2009/5360039348/

looks like pretty good spec... or am i missing something?

racist of the falling leaves (haitch), Sunday, 18 October 2009 12:47 (fifteen years ago)

haha, the brakes i missed. duh.

racist of the falling leaves (haitch), Sunday, 18 October 2009 12:54 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure that must be a typo. I'm not aware that Shimano have made 600 brakes for years, could be 6600 or 6700.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 18 October 2009 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

So i rode my bike w/sticky headset, looked down after a couple of miles and my handlebars were wonky, realised i'd forgotten to tighten the stem bolts, lol.

surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Sunday, 18 October 2009 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

noob questions

i) how to choose new seat?
ii) wht is etiquette if someone smokes u and u kno u cd smoke them back?
iii) is there a proper way to advance down the gears, i.e., when going up a hill I shift down all the way till I'm on the easiest gear but then want to shift down a big gear which would mean I'd be in the easiest gear on the front and back... is it ok to dial in a few shift ups on the rear derailleur at the same time as dialling in the shift down on the front? I am dumm I kno

pineapple expressionist (webinar), Thursday, 22 October 2009 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

iv) when to join club and what are the benefits? I'd like riding partners, I know that
v) I need clipless pedals don't I?

pineapple expressionist (webinar), Thursday, 22 October 2009 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

good qs

i) this is hard. some say to test before you buy, but unless you've broken in a saddle and given your body to get used to it as well, there's no real way perfect way to choose one. i like fizik, generally. i don't like selle italia. that's all i've tried.

ii) how do you know you can smoke them? if the guy looks back at you to see if you are chasing him, you better try and smoke them back.

iii) don't do it at the same time. do the rear derailleur first.

iv) benefits are new riding partners, friends, dates?, community, etc

v) yes

cutty, Friday, 23 October 2009 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

given your body *time to get used to it as well

cutty, Friday, 23 October 2009 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

i) mine is a selle italia, I think, and I've done 100 miles in it w/bibs and my sitbones are sore after each ride, don't know if that's because the rides are 2+ hours or just because it's a bad fit. will look into another

ii) some old dude smoked me cos I was sauntering along at a nice leisurely pace enjoying the sunshine so I rode on his wheel for a few miles and cd've easily smoked him bt I thought tht might be perceived as petty so I pulled in and took a break

iii) noted

iv) ok, got to find one then, there are a few round here

v) guh

coz (webinar), Friday, 23 October 2009 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

Oh god, not only did you get scalped by and old dude, but you then drafted him and didn't even get by. Hang your head in shame young man.

Mark C, Friday, 23 October 2009 10:00 (fifteen years ago)

I cd've took him, old man

coz (webinar), Friday, 23 October 2009 10:13 (fifteen years ago)

cd've shd've wd've

cutty, Friday, 23 October 2009 11:50 (fifteen years ago)

ddn't

am0n, Friday, 23 October 2009 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.mid-lifecycle.com/graphics/grandpa.jpg

Teh Movable Object (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 23 October 2009 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

:*(

anyway - new qn - commuting by bike: c or d? and how far is too far? (I appreciate tht is a difficult question and depends on yr fitness etc)

coz (webinar), Monday, 26 October 2009 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

c, and over 10 miles is getting a bit far.

Mark C, Monday, 26 October 2009 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

16 miles in a nice straight line. sounds like that'd be ok for the occasional but not the everyday

coz (webinar), Monday, 26 October 2009 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Classic. I do 365 days a year basically, five miles each way.

Sixteen would be a pain in the winter, but I imagine the UK would be much more tolerable

how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 26 October 2009 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

you commute to work on christmas? new year's eve? thanksgiving?!

cutty, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

i meant new years day duhrrrr

cutty, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

u know what I mean u horrible Nazi

how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 26 October 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

also I don't have a job!!!

how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 26 October 2009 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

yeah u don't commute on weekends either i'm sure!@ LIES!

cutty, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

biking to work

cutty, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

this is really interesting I thought
http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2009/10/when-the-paceline-stalls/

but I only half understand - can someone explain why it's easier to ride behind someone/as part of a group than to lead the pack? it can't only be less wind resistance is it?

coz (webinar), Thursday, 29 October 2009 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

I found a club btw, going to go along to their next sunday ride

coz (webinar), Thursday, 29 October 2009 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

it's less wind resistance

cutty, Thursday, 29 October 2009 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

Less wind resistance by a massive margin, too.

Mark C, Friday, 30 October 2009 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

interesting, thanks

coz (webinar), Saturday, 31 October 2009 00:11 (fifteen years ago)

two months pass...

OK um lol how do u even clip into spds?! practice?

cozwn, Thursday, 31 December 2009 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, that's it basically. You'll fall over a couple of times. I think setting the tension on the pedal as low as possible helps, but I'm starting to think this might make it worse because there's more movement before it unclips. Anyway I find unclipping a lot harder and stressful than clipping in.

Also this thread Clipless pedals question(s)

useless chamber, Thursday, 31 December 2009 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

ha figured as much; stood the bike up in the kitchen and tried to clip in - couldn't even get one foot in. just as well really; if I'd got in I'd probably never have got out and that'd have ruined my NYE

cozwn, Thursday, 31 December 2009 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

Clipping in should be pretty straightforward though, you just feel where the clip is and press down and it should clip in. But yeah, practice is it really.

Don't do what I did and try clipping in with the cleat not totally secure in the shoe because that's a complete pain to sort out.

useless chamber, Thursday, 31 December 2009 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

clipping in took me forever to do the 1st time; clipping out was pretty intuitive (just twist your heel). once you're in, it's not difficult to pop back out - it's figuring out how to center your cleat over the jaws on the pedal and then push down/forward at the right angle that can be tricky.

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Friday, 1 January 2010 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

i just got my first bike since highschool (15+yrs) for xmas. 3speed internal hub. only concern is the coaster break which is just a lil weird. but hasn't been that much of a prob. been riding a bunch around town. pretty stoked.
http://www.swobo.com/catalog/product_info_b.php?cPath=201_207

no real question, just i'm a noob. sup

jaxon, Sunday, 10 January 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)

er, brake. i've got a few friends that work for the company, so felt nice contributing somehow

jaxon, Sunday, 10 January 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)

SUP NOOB!

sir ilx-a-lot (cutty), Sunday, 10 January 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

ONE OF US

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Monday, 11 January 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

hey, uh, I'm trying to buy a bike & I just got a line on a frame in my size made by Torelli (2005 Cortona) partially outfitted w/ an Ultegra r. der. & some other decent-sounding stuff. Now I need to figure out if this would be worth the investment, given that I would have to come up w/ several parts on my own. This is going to require some research.

Anyone have any thoughts on Torelli frames? Since I wouldn't be able to test ride it before I buy it, I would prob just use it for a few months & then resell it & get something else, so if they are not particularly sought after or something, that would be nice to know.

Also, the bike is set up to be ridden as a nine-speed, tho I could buy a few different things & switch it to a ten-speed from the outset. If I end up buying it, I'd prefer to keep it as a nine-speed for the season & worry about other possibilities later on. Since I'll just be concentrating on general distance/endurance riding this year, will keeping this as a nine-speed limit me in any significant way?

Man or Austro-Hungarian? (Pillbox), Sunday, 21 February 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

I would prob just use it for a few months & then resell it - I mean that I would do this if I don't end up liking it for whatever reason, tho chances are it will be fine for my immediate needs & I'll just end up using it.

Man or Austro-Hungarian? (Pillbox), Sunday, 21 February 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

Not sure what your geographical sitch is but buying a frame that you haven't ridden is pretty @_@, I tested over a dozen frames (10-50 miles per test) before choosing my current ride.

Jussayin/one rider's opinion.

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 21 February 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

I'm in Toledo, OH currently & have been observing the rust-belt used markets. I just did a bit of research & found out that there is a Torelli dealer in Dayton, so maybe i could take an afternoon & test-ride something, if they have a similar version of the frame.

In general, buying a used bike is turning out to be quite a hassle, tho at least the research involved has been educational.

Man or Austro-Hungarian? (Pillbox), Sunday, 21 February 2010 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

i thot i posted an answer to this query before, but anyway-- 9 is fine.

torellis rep is ok, those frames look like std mid level alu. they are sorta steep geometry wise, like 74 deg s/t all sizes from what i could tell.

malicious humor victim (Hunt3r), Sunday, 21 February 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

two months pass...

I take it it's easy enough to change the handlebars on a bike from one type to another?

manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

threadless stem: yeah
threaded: lol

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

beware bar/stem diameter differences.

"old" (~pre-2002) road bars and stems- 26 mm (except for really old cinelli which were 26.4 i think)
"old" mountain bars/stems- 25.4 mm
new standard- 31.8? i think

also if you put mountain bars on a road bike you will usually need about 2 or 3 cm longer stem and vice versa

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

also beware differences in gear and brake lever clamps.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)

and if you're changing from a flat bar to a riser bar on a mountain bike, you may need longer brake/shift cables.

noob answer: changing anything on a bike is never easy enough.

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

I started riding my bike (part way) to work this month - most of my ride is along a paved bike trail, but 1/3rd is on a busy road. I think I need a rear view mirror. Helmet mount? I don't know. The ones that go in the ends of the handlebars have some kind of familiarity factor so I am leaning toward those.

Jaq, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

Just as long as you don't let a mirror become and excuse for not shoulder checking when you should!

Mark C, Friday, 21 May 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

The guys who signed me up for this challenge looked very skeptical that I would need one, said I should just practice looking back w/o veering.

Jaq, Friday, 21 May 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, mirrors don't seem that useful to me, tbh---they shake and vibrate like mad, and aren't nearly as reliable as just turning your head.

gbx, Friday, 21 May 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

Emma and I are thinking about getting bikes via the Cyclescheme thing (while we still can). We would be riding to work sometimes, which is about 2-3 miles, mainly along roads, pretty flat. But we also live near a glorious, many mile long towpath that goes alongside a beautiful canal / river. And we're in Devon, which may not have the biggest or steepest hills ever, but which has a LOT of hills, so we'd need geared bikes.

From what I know, which isn't much, I'm thinking we want hybrid bikes. Emma wants something that looks like Mary Poppins would ride it, I suspect. I would like something more modern. I don't want a big heavy sturdy mountain bike, but i don't want a skinny terrifying fastasfuck road bike either.

This place - http://www.bikesheduk.com/ - is very close by, and reputedly very good indeed. We had a nose round at the weekend and it certainly looked impressive.

I'd be willing to go maybe £800 between us, especially through the Cyclescheme (salary exchange thing through working at the uni).

Advice very welcome!

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 25 May 2010 06:59 (fifteen years ago)

Pootling along the river to eat picnics and take photographs is the ideal use for these bikes, to be brutally honest.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 25 May 2010 07:00 (fifteen years ago)

Something with a basket on the front to put Cosmo in, maybe.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 25 May 2010 07:01 (fifteen years ago)

i would steer clear of hybrids - their suspension is usually not really great quality. if you're just going on gravel paths you'd both be fine with no suspension and fatter tyres to compensate.

giants are usually well-specced for their price point, maybe investigate a CRX flat-bar for yrself? not sure what's good in ladybike land tbh!

erotic geometry (haitch), Tuesday, 25 May 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)

Nick, get Emma some cute-as-chips dutch-style number, and get yourself a cyclocross bike.

Mark C, Tuesday, 25 May 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

Specialized Sirrus(M)/Vita(F) look good in this regard. Wholeheartedly agree with haitch on the suspension thing. Giant Rapid series looks nice and I liked the Giant I test rode.

Also on that list, if they do Orbea's fitness range the Orbea Aos and Bios look great.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 25 May 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

On the weekend I went for a 20-mile ride on pretty rocky towpaths by the Thames. One of our party rode a 23mm-wheel fixie, and while he was bumped around a fair bit he didn't fall off or puncture.

Mark C, Tuesday, 25 May 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

noob qn: what is it with the rims on some bikes, e.g. the moots psychlo-x on the bike lust thread? do they add rigidity? are they for aerodynamic reasons?

cozen, Thursday, 27 May 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

you are talking about the Mavic Carbone series...

well #1 they are carbon: very light composite material
#2 they have a deep 50-60mm rim flange which is more aero... can be faster in certain situations (low-wind, high speed)

they are not necessarily stronger or more rigid... their true benefit is in the weight savings and the aero benefit.

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 27 May 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

i think most deeps are more rigid which may help with lower spoke counts

if you can afford to burn through a bunch of 'em, all carbon deep tubies are supposedly good for cx/mud performance.

back in the days of spinergy revx i had some teammates who loved them for cx because they were actually very soft radially (basically 4 spokes) and absorbed shock pretty well.

establishment man cloggin up ur spills (Hunt3r), Thursday, 27 May 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

also heard that deep profile sheds mud better than box profile

gbx, Thursday, 27 May 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

Got a quote on a £400 Marin Larkspur, whatever that means. I rode it and it was good, though. Emma got a quote on a Trek Allant which is very cute.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 27 May 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

Why do you want such a heavy bike with all those hills?

Mark C, Friday, 28 May 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

And I guess you don't want his and hers bikes, but the Trek Allant for chaps is very pretty and has a handy rack if you're set on getting a hybrid.

Mark C, Friday, 28 May 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

really tempted to trade up my town bike for something lighter and sexier

cozen, Friday, 28 May 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

Mine was way lighter than the Allant for boys, I thought!

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 28 May 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

Instead of my usual routine of riding a consistent but difficult pace (I'd say 85% of max effort) on my 15 mile commute home, last few days I've been spinning easier on the flats and then doing max effort sprints up the climbs (5 locations along PCH where it rises about 150 feet over 1/2 mile), not for any strict reason, just for fun, to switch up the routine. Anyway, I find that going up the slight hills while out of the saddle like that I skip out my rear wheel quite a bit. I'm mostly on the hoods, and leaned over pretty far over the bars. I'm guessing this is the reason? If I want to sprint like this should I stand straighter up? Could it be a bike geometery issue? I'm 6'1" and ride a size ML Giant TCR (effective top tube 57cm). I put a 130mm stem on recently to put myself into a little more leaned-over position, so I'm hanging a little further over the front wheel than I was before.

Anyway, is this a common thing? What to do to avoid it?

sous les paves, Friday, 4 June 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)

Used to do this on loose-surface mtb climbs, solution is basically don't lean so far forward.

sent from my neural lace (ledge), Friday, 4 June 2010 09:56 (fifteen years ago)

It does just sound like a weight distribution thing to me, assuming your rear tyre is in good condition and the road surface hasn't been wet. Seems it could also be quite dangerous to have the front wheel so loaded as you'd wipe out completely if you hit an oil spill or nasty pothole.

Also, I wonder if your pedal stroke is in part the issue? If you are pushing down on one pedal or other 100% of the time, you should have enough downforce for the back wheel not to skip. If you're effectively unweighting the pedals during your stroke, then that will also help the back end skip. Maybe.

Mark C, Friday, 4 June 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)

how do you keep your water cold on warm days?

cozen, Saturday, 5 June 2010 09:16 (fifteen years ago)

wrap in a wet towel -> evaporation -> inside = cold

StanM, Saturday, 5 June 2010 09:20 (fifteen years ago)

perhaps a sock wd be better?

doesn't sound like it'd look PRO tho

cozen, Saturday, 5 June 2010 09:51 (fifteen years ago)

same principle: http://www.maxchill.com/Home.html

StanM, Saturday, 5 June 2010 10:05 (fifteen years ago)

freeze water bottles overnight (with water inside)

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Saturday, 5 June 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

^tried that but it didn't work for me; 30mins in they had melted and by an 1hr in they were beginning to get warm : /

noob questions:
(i) how do I tell what cassette/gearing I have - I think it's 12x27 but I can't be sure
(ii) how do I tell what size (measurement?) of tyres I have (and thus need for replacements and replacement tubes)?
(iii) when clipped in am I supposed to be pulling on the upstroke along w/pushing on the down?

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

i) count or look for the writing on the cogs, if you can't see the writing your cogs are too dirty, clean them, filthmonger.

ii) again should be embossed on the sidewall of the tire but it is also the approximate inflated diameter of the fat bit of the tyre

iii) yes but it fast becomes second nature, i wouldn't force it especially as your muscles may be under-developed. You'll know you're getting it when you ride all day and the things that hurt are your hamstrings.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

is 12x27 an old man's gearing?

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

I find the little rind p.useless and the hardest gear on the biggest ring doesn't give me enough tension when going all-out

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

ring*

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

What are your front rings and what sort of cadence are you riding at?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

now you're getting technical!

(dunno :))

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

12x27 with a standard crank (53x39) = fit rider looking for a bailout up steep climbs
12x27 with a compact crank (50x34) = perfect for beginners, but don't be mistaken: even some pro guys will go compact with a 27 if there are significant mtn passes to be ridden on a particular stage.

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, I think it's a compact (how do I know if it is?) I should take my bike to a mechanic and get him to talk me through it I guess

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

the amount of teeth should be written on the chainrings

cutty, Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

and as Ed mentioned upthread... you can count the teeth ffs! :-P

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

counting is hard

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

noob question: how do I count?

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

(ty for humouring a noob dudes)

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crankset#Chainrings

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

all those metal bits emanating outward from the metal ring are "teeth". the amount of teeth on your chainring versus the amount on your rear cog (a cluster of which is referred to as a cassette) will determine your gear inch ratio, ie, how much work required to turn the pedals.

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

ok now you're just taking the piss

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

h8 u

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

:)

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

:) I'm grateful for the help, ty

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

When trying to count the teeth you could place a finger or thumb on each tooth as you work your way round. You have a total of five of these on each hand. Given that all your cogs and rings will have more than ten teeth, and that you only have two hands*, you will need to enlist the help of at least one other person for this exercise, perhaps even five additional people. Once all the teeth have a digit resting on them simply count the number of whole hands involved and multiply by five. Add on the number of fingers used from the incomplete hand (if there is one) and hey presto, you have your teeth number. Ensure you and your five companions wash your hands thoroughly afterwards.

*I assume

I Ain't Committing Suicide For No Crab (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

I thought this was a safe zone :__(
http://www.genderworkchicago.org/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/safe_zone.320201324_std.JPG

flamelurker (cozen), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

see but I actually do have two hands but ~no fingers~

how do I shot

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

don't worry you are still in the nest

it's jsut that while the old man is gone mean low cat bullies think they can just go around out PROing the n00bs

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

I miss the Hunt3r. :-(

I h8 the rest of u, well... except for all of you.

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

yeah he is the only way I know about cycling in the 90s

heard he owned one of the very first anodized skewers

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

high fived tinker juarez at a trade show

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

crashed a prototype y-33 in moab

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

had beers the night before the actual YETI gave up the bike game and rejoined his people in the mountains of the himalaya

gbx, Thursday, 10 June 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

listening to music while on bike: y/n?

stofu (cozen), Thursday, 17 June 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

emphatically no, I enjoy being not dead.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 17 June 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

what about podcasts

stofu (cozen), Thursday, 17 June 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

enh, i'm 50-50 on the music thing. when i was taking classes, i could do 90% of my commute on the greenway, where jamming tunes just isn't an issue at all.

now i've got a) those squishy sound canceling headphones and b) a commute thru downtown, so no dice

flapjackin (gbx), Thursday, 17 June 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

i tried this only once and i immediately felt like my balance was off and couldn't do it -- some kind of inner ear, reg'lar ear connection problem maybe?

goole, Thursday, 17 June 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

can't beat the dulcet tones of m.bragg on in our time as you cruise along I find
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/img/presenters/melvyn_bragg.jpg

stofu (cozen), Thursday, 17 June 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

on cyclist-only closed circuits it's questionably of merit, but impairing your senses anywhere with auto traffic is not a good idea imo.

i did a hillclimb a week ago and there was a gal with a music system with speakers on her rig, thought it was kinda cute.

_▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 17 June 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

I always feel kinda envious of people who can listen to music when they're riding, but I really can't dare myself to even try it. If I'm ever off the bike for commuting for more than a day at a time it's the extra hour or so of listening and reading that makes it harder to get back on the saddle.

useless chamber, Thursday, 17 June 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

saw some old man beardo with a custom rigged helmet w/two small speakers projecting sound into the helmet from the outside. not very aero, but he could still listen to music w/o impairing his senses

flapjackin (gbx), Friday, 18 June 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

I am SO aware of the conscious and subconscious help my ears give me when commuting in London that I would feel extremely uneasy if I took away even part of that ability. Lots of people swear it doesn't cause any problems but I just can't believe them.

I also like the bike for a chance to think, and to take in sights and sounds (even if most of them are of traffic). It never occurs to me that I'd enjoy my ride more with music; when I'm in a car driving it's somehow a much less immersive experience, and there's a place for music to add to the experience that just isn't there on a bike. I guess I'm saying I'm never *bored* on a bike in a way that music would fix.

Mark C, Friday, 18 June 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)

I think trying to ride w/ headphones would be kind of nerve-wracking for me. Even on the country roads that I do most of my riding on, I know I would find myself constantly looking over my shoulder to make sure there wasn't some garbage truck barreling toward me or something.

the one corey (Pillbox), Friday, 18 June 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

don't commute w/ headphones, but i find them quite necessary for long, solo, soul-searching rides

cutty, Friday, 18 June 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

was given a bike for my birthday a couple of years ago. i like it - it's a little heavy - but i don't know where the frame is from. no markings at all, matte black, except for a little sticker that says "Bulletproof". googling is no help. is this a brand or what? was wondering if it's good enough to keep and add parts to or whether i should think about starting with something better. (note: i am a total noob, so don't think i can justify a frame over £300)

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 18 June 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I'm saying I'm never *bored* on a bike in a way that music would fix

Yeah, agreed. If I thought riding a bike was boring, I wouldn't be riding a bike in my free time. I'm on the bike for the fun of it - it's not like I need music to make it bearable. Whereas most people don't drive cars just for the fun of driving.

I Ain't Committing Suicide For No Crab (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 19 June 2010 07:53 (fifteen years ago)

i almost always ride with headphones in, including city riding... i find that i can hear road noise well enough to be safe, as long as i'm not blasting the music. but reading the pretty much 100% attitude against riding w/headphones, maybe i should reconsider because i'm being unsafe? i'm not going to challop and say that it doesn't affect my ability to hear road noise at all, just that i can still hear cars pulling around me, honking, etc.

dad, i wanna be a lothario speedwagon (ytth), Sunday, 20 June 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

I guess all you can do is do a direct comparison and see if the difference is noticeable/positive.

The things I would worry about not being able to hear are, say, the difference between a car and a scooter engine behind me, the difference between a car coasting and revving, whether a car's approaching along an as yet unseen side road, the noises that tell me what the van I just filtered past is going to do next, that kind of thing. I am sure I'd be shoulder checking a lot more, which may be a good thing, who knows.

Mark C, Tuesday, 22 June 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)

so... I am thinking of doing a 90k charity ride in September but I'm not sure how feasible it is. would appreciate advice from seasoned ILTRMBors...

It's the Tour de Picnic which involves cycling from Dublin (starting at 10am) to the Electric Picnic, which is the best major music festival in Ireland (Roxy Music / Leftfield / Massive Attack / LCD Soundsystem headlining this year). Your bags and tents are brought down separately and if you raise €500 (for a kids' hospital) your ticket is paid for.

Sounds pretty tempting but I have no idea if I'm up to it... I cycle pretty much every day to/from the city centre (only about 3 miles each way). I'm fitter than I have been in a good while, last month I ran my first ever 10k in just under 50 minutes. My bike is a cheap but reliable traditional dudes' bike and may also be inferior to the challenge. I wouldn't be buying a new bike for this tho...

is it doable? (there's also the question of raising that much money!!). any tips on training / gear / etc would also be much appreciated!

p-dog, Saturday, 26 June 2010 16:29 (fourteen years ago)

90k should be very doable for anyone with moderate fitness, by way of comparison we took complete novices on our 5 day DC to pittsburgh ride and they coped just fine, and that was longer every day, off road and carrying all ones own stuff. Most people can quite happily average a little over 15km/h for hours without batting an eyelid. That's 6 hours in the saddle at the very worst and 8 once you stop for lunch and along the way.

Given your gear is taken for you, all you should need is water bottles, 2 if your bike will take them, a pump, spare tube and tyre levers. get a small underseat bag or handlebar bag for these. Don't forget to eat and drink often, pack lots of bananas, chocolate, trail mix etc. YOu'll need a waterproof, and padded shorts is probably a good idea. You'll also have a better time if you grease areas likely to chafe, there are professional bum grease products but vaseline or nappy rash cream work almost as well. ALthough you don't need it a cycling jersey is nice to have, if only for the useful pockets on the back.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 26 June 2010 17:13 (fourteen years ago)

Oh, a cheapo bike computer is nice, you can use it to pace yourself, given your recent running exploits you should probably have no problems at an 18 km/h average or even higher. Get one and go an knock off 30km, you should have no problems.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 26 June 2010 17:15 (fourteen years ago)

The bottom bracket on a bike I was hoping to sell is wobbly. Front hub is wobbly too. This is after it was sitting in a room being unridden for a year :/ anyway how do i shot wobbly bracket/hub? New bracket and hub called for? That would be annoying, don't want to have to spend cash to fix a bike I want to sell.

postcards from the (ledge), Thursday, 1 July 2010 13:27 (fourteen years ago)

overhauling a bottom bracket is maybe the most dreadful bike mechanic maneuvers apparently.

cutty, Thursday, 1 July 2010 14:07 (fourteen years ago)

good luck!

cutty, Thursday, 1 July 2010 14:08 (fourteen years ago)

might just wheel it into my lbs and ask for a quote

postcards from the (ledge), Thursday, 1 July 2010 14:08 (fourteen years ago)

my previous record at bottom bracket overhauls is not great (count=1, result=stripped thread)

postcards from the (ledge), Thursday, 1 July 2010 14:09 (fourteen years ago)

if you're selling it, just put in the cheapest bb you can find... it will cost you less than having a shop overhaul it, and it will save you a whole lot of headache trying to do it yourself. you can probably just tighten the hub cones to take the wobble out of the hub.

dad, i wanna be a lothario speedwagon (ytth), Saturday, 3 July 2010 04:37 (fourteen years ago)

one month passes...

^ i did this, thx. well, got lbs to do the bb. yet to sell bike.

when you *cannot* fit yr tyres back over the rim, what do you do? is there a tool? tyre levers don't seem to be any help. fortunately this time my flatmate helped me out with his climber's thumbs but he is shortly to return to australia.

ledge, Thursday, 26 August 2010 08:55 (fourteen years ago)

old tyres you can't get back on, or new ones? had trouble trying to fit a new pair on my good wheels when i got them, but not really since.

faceless, right-wing, henchman. (haitch), Friday, 27 August 2010 06:20 (fourteen years ago)

not brand new but not old, only the first time i've tried to refit them.

ledge, Friday, 27 August 2010 08:15 (fourteen years ago)

I got one of these VAR tyre tools which is supposed to help you get the tyre over the rim:
http://www.cyclebasket.com/products.php?plid=m5b93s281p92&rs=gb
It doesn't always help, though, to be honest.

My brother's got some kind of telescopic tyre lever which he claims is really useful. I'm not sure how it works, but I guess one end ataches to the hub or something.

Jerome Personnel Cheeses (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 27 August 2010 08:34 (fourteen years ago)

I have that telescopic lever and I don't find it very useful (I've gone back to my trusty old-school levers). It's a nice idea as you can just revolve it around the hub to take off or put on the tyre, but it still needs the force applied like a normal lever, except in this case you don't have a second lever to help you out. Also, because it is long and telescopy it feels more fragile.

Mark C, Friday, 27 August 2010 11:16 (fourteen years ago)

I dreamt about tires last night!

Probably because I'm still waiting for the shop to get those Panaracers in a week later, grr.

LA river flood (lukas), Friday, 27 August 2010 16:38 (fourteen years ago)

new mac or new bike?

jozam djinn (cozen), Monday, 30 August 2010 22:21 (fourteen years ago)

I just bought a new bike, so you'd better buy a new mac.

Mark C, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 10:18 (fourteen years ago)

pics

jozam djinn (cozen), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 10:27 (fourteen years ago)

Haven't got it yet, but it's to replace my stolen Felt MTB:

http://2009.feltracing.com/09/images/catalog/large/9010.png

Mark C, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:41 (fourteen years ago)

one month passes...

Flat spots in wheels: can they be fixed? Sheldon brown says yay, two LBSs say nay. Both my mtb wheels are afflicted ;_;

ledge, Wednesday, 6 October 2010 08:55 (fourteen years ago)

Flat spots on the rims, you mean? From having under-inflated tyres perhaps ;)

Mark C, Wednesday, 6 October 2010 10:49 (fourteen years ago)

three months pass...

is this bike ok for me to use for three months around bristol and then sell? if y, is it worth the asking price?

http://bristol.gumtree.com/bristol/63/71415163.html

caek, Thursday, 13 January 2011 17:41 (fourteen years ago)

depends where you need to go and how strong you are feeling. 39-28 up to clifton every day will grow you some legs. This is possibly why he's selling it. I wouldn't pay much more than 100 quid for it.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 13 January 2011 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

thanks. i have a reasonably pedestrian route from bishopston to the uni, i.e. not quite up to clifton, and over a longer distance/lower grade. just sent a cheeky lowball offer though. will let you know.

caek, Friday, 14 January 2011 00:36 (fourteen years ago)

lowball denied.

this would obv. be fine, but is it worth £475? and will i be able to sell it for >300 after daily use in a few months? http://bristol.gumtree.com/bristol/24/70210224.html

caek, Friday, 14 January 2011 19:26 (fourteen years ago)

It's not worth £475. Even if it is like brand new (and if it has been used only once why's it been serviced?) then that's a steep price. But, if you take care of it then yes, it should be worth £300+ in 3 months. But I don't like buying from liars.

Mark C, Monday, 17 January 2011 11:10 (fourteen years ago)

Also 53.5 is described as "M/L" and you're quite tall, aren't you? On a sizing guide I found it suggests this is for 5'9" to 6".

Mark C, Monday, 17 January 2011 11:14 (fourteen years ago)

Ah, to be fair Giant's own sizing guide says 5'10" to 6'1".

http://archive.giant-bicycles.com/us/050.000.000/050.600.100.asp

Mark C, Monday, 17 January 2011 11:20 (fourteen years ago)

I'm 5'10" so it should be fine, but yes that service is a bit fishy. He's told me in detail what they did in that service, I know the place that did it and it all sounds reasonable, but not for a bike that's been used once. Other people are viewing tonight and tomorrow, so I will wait to see where the bidding stands. I have a number in mind.

caek, Monday, 17 January 2011 11:31 (fourteen years ago)

Good thinking (and sorry, I had it in my head you were 6'3" or something). If the bike's relatively new and has had a bona fide service, then why bullshit about it?

Anyone know how much getting a bottom bracket either serviced or replaced might cost? If the latter, then something cheap and functional as it's a bike I need to sell.

Mark C, Monday, 17 January 2011 13:21 (fourteen years ago)

increase in punctures recently...

i've checked around the wheel and in the tyre and there aren't any sharp bits or anything. my tyres are fairly buggered from glass and stuff.

what's a good tyre / tube combo for these harsh london roads?

Crackle Box, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:01 (fourteen years ago)

dont sweat the tubes, imo

i used soma everwears when i lived in chicago and they worked great (i was also on a brakeless track bike and did a lot of skidding). heavy-ish, tho, but i'm guessing that isn't really an issue

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:04 (fourteen years ago)

Schwalbe Marathons have a good rep round here, I run them and they are heavy but pretty indestructible. As for tubes, I ran slimed ones for a while but not really sure if they are worth it if you put money into tyres.

Another top tip. Check your Rim tape hasn't rucked up, folded or exposed spoke holes as that will kill tubes pretty quickly.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

Anyone know how much getting a bottom bracket either serviced or replaced might cost?

i had this done a while ago, for a bike i needed to sell (and haven't done yet). think it was about £40-50 for cheapest bb + labour?

nanoflymo (ledge), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

whoah pricey!

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:09 (fourteen years ago)

cartridge BBs are hella cheap, and if yr repacking loose bearings that seems like a ton of money for labor

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)

20% VAT. london pricing, it's why I own my own tools.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:11 (fourteen years ago)

VAT is impossible for me to understand

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:17 (fourteen years ago)

also, any london people have a favourite LBS that'll do a full clean / servive jobby on my bike? feel like it's taken quite a battering over the last few months.

Crackle Box, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:35 (fourteen years ago)

VAT is just a national sales tax, gbx

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:41 (fourteen years ago)

right, but isn't it structured in some complicated way? liiiiike at several points along the supply chain, whereas a US state's sales tax is only applied at the final point of sale? i dunno.

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:44 (fourteen years ago)

actually it wasn't the cheapest bb i got, forget the details but 'cause of the bike he had to get a pricier one (and nah i wasn't being fleeced, they're pretty decent, would recommend for full service etc...)

http://www.londonbicycle.com/repairs.html

nanoflymo (ledge), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:51 (fourteen years ago)

right, but isn't it structured in some complicated way? liiiiike at several points along the supply chain, whereas a US state's sales tax is only applied at the final point of sale? i dunno.

no, it's just a sales tax.

caek, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:19 (fourteen years ago)

oh. huh.

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:21 (fourteen years ago)

noob VAT questions

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)

I never have to worry, cuz I always get mine back upon departure... B-)

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)

it's not just a sales tax, although the effect is much the same. It is a tax on the value added at each point on the supply chain. When you file your quarterly VAT return you pay the VAT you charged your customers less the VAT your supplier charged you.

However, as a consumer you just see the price, inclusive of the 20% VAT and what you pay is functionally the same as if you paid a 20% US style sales tax.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:25 (fourteen years ago)

It is very annoying that, as a non resident british subject, I can't claim the VAT back on departure.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

aha!!

ullr saves (gbx), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

tire recommendation: i LOOOVE my vittoria randonneurs 700x32, it is the first puncture resistant tire that i think actually does something other than add weight. xpost

end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 20:39 (fourteen years ago)

I have some Schwalbe Durano Pluses - light and racy (to a point) but with extra puncture protection. Only done a few hundred miles on them to date but none so far.

Mark C, Friday, 28 January 2011 11:06 (fourteen years ago)

Apologies - they're Stelvio Pluses (the rest of the post still applies).

Mark C, Monday, 31 January 2011 00:08 (fourteen years ago)

any idea what this is likely to go for: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150559531383. i mean are we talking £300 or £900?

caek, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 12:34 (fourteen years ago)

I'm going to say above £600 possibly nearer £900.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 13:10 (fourteen years ago)

on the one hand, its probly "worth" 800 to 900 really, but irl i don't know what the market is for nice shit (assuming its not clapped out) on a scrubby (though entirely satifactory) frame. seems like surly should make an effort to source a steel fork that isnt a boat anchor, really.

or, what Ed wrote.

end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 13:34 (fourteen years ago)

haha, ok

caek, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 13:38 (fourteen years ago)

50/34 x 13/29 = fat mantis friendly.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 9 February 2011 14:39 (fourteen years ago)

bought a 2010 secteur triple on sale at the LBS at £399 from £549. should get me through to the summer relocation without further devaluation. first road bike in 10+ years, and certainly the first non-beater.

that surly went for £600 in the end btw.

caek, Monday, 21 February 2011 14:42 (fourteen years ago)

cycling from bristol to bath and back (~30 miles) tomorrow via lunch on friend's canal barge. luv my bike.

caek, Friday, 25 February 2011 19:29 (fourteen years ago)

sure, i wasn't wearing cycling shorts, i've not been on a bike for ~1 yr, and i was used to a slightly more padded saddle when i was cycling around town regularly, but should i really be this saddle sore after 30 miles? could it be a setup problem?

caek, Sunday, 27 February 2011 14:27 (fourteen years ago)

no chamois + 2hrs? + sweat + friction + no riding for a year = no surprise to me duder.

A Scanner Snarkly (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 27 February 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i guess. saddle set up feels ok.

feel like someone took a tenderizer to my bum.

caek, Sunday, 27 February 2011 16:01 (fourteen years ago)

there is a thread for this feeling iirc

A Scanner Snarkly (Steve Shasta), Sunday, 27 February 2011 16:04 (fourteen years ago)

right now its the US politics thread afaict

end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Sunday, 27 February 2011 17:01 (fourteen years ago)

Sounds right caek - a few more miles/weeks and you'll be fine.

Mark C, Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:56 (fourteen years ago)

my bum is better!

caek, Thursday, 3 March 2011 16:49 (fourteen years ago)

Hurrah!

WAYNE ROONEY ELBOW STORM (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 3 March 2011 16:50 (fourteen years ago)

Well that's pretty subjective.

Mark C, Thursday, 3 March 2011 17:00 (fourteen years ago)

got a problem with my front derailleur: small ring seems ok, but with the left shifter under full tension (i.e. trying to change into the big ring), the chain rubs against the inside of the derailleur cage with the chain stuck on the middle ring (this is on the smallest rear cog). i've already got the adjustment screw as loose as possible, so the cage is free to more as far as possible away from the frame. is this a cable tension issue? or is it a problem with the alignment of the derailleur mechanism? new bike, done maybe 100 miles.

on a possibly related issue, is it normal to service a new bike after it's had a chance to settle down

caek, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

My guess is you have probably had a little cable stretch and a little slippage through the retaining screw. It's not uncommon with a new bike. You'll have to set it up again which is pretty simple, give me a moment and I'll find a how-to.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.parktool.com/blog/repair-help/front-derailleur-adjustments
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/derailer-adjustment.html

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:42 (fourteen years ago)

is the cage mech contacting the limit screw? if not, then it is cable adjustment. if yes, it is an alignment/derailler swing capacity issue.

another way to test this is can you manually pull on the front derailler cable and cause the cage to swing further? if yes, it is cable adjustment.

this can happen if the derailler pinch bolt was not tightened enough and the cable has slipped.
xpost

end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:42 (fourteen years ago)

my city bike has those suntour symmetric shifters described on the sheldon brown page. they suck.

just woke up (lukas), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)

i don't understand this: "is the cage mech contacting the limit screw?" could you elaborate?

caek, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:59 (fourteen years ago)

not quickly. if the shifting used to work, and now it doesnt, and you haven't crashed or banged the mech, it's almost surely a cable adjust.

end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)

is it normal to service a new bike after it's had a chance to settle down?

Yes, they usually say give it 100 miles or so to stretch the cables and then get everything adjusted/checked

WAYNE ROONEY ELBOW STORM (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 20:44 (fourteen years ago)

Did you adjust the limit screw? That was your first error. This sounds entirely like cable stretch and is incredibly easy to fix, but if you've buggered about with the limit screw then either try to return it to how it was or get an expert to sort it.

And yes, it is normal and sensible to have your bike serviced after a few weeks' riding. Ideally this'll be a freebie from the shop where you bought it.

Mark C, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 22:47 (fourteen years ago)

the limit screws are back where they were afaict, and it is certainly no worse.

i am go away for three weeks on monday, so i will get it serviced when i get back. two rings are usable in the meantime.

caek, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 12:48 (fourteen years ago)

(sorry my last post reads really sniffy!)

Mark C, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 13:34 (fourteen years ago)

haha no problem!

caek, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 14:03 (fourteen years ago)

I'm a total noob looking to buy a bike, and trying to decide between a road, hybrid, or touring style. I am looking to do longer rides on paved surfaces, in a hilly area (bay area). Friend of my swears by his Surly Crosscheck because of how rugged it is. I rode it once and loved it, but it strikes me as maybe being too heavy.

rockapads, Saturday, 19 March 2011 17:41 (fourteen years ago)

don't do like i did and buy a hybrid if you think you'll be at all interested in cycling more than in the city. i got the bug real quick.

jaxon, Saturday, 19 March 2011 22:24 (fourteen years ago)

going to buy a pompino

nultimate fighting champ (cozen), Saturday, 19 March 2011 22:33 (fourteen years ago)

i got one. is nice.

ledge, Saturday, 19 March 2011 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

yes hello. i would like to buy a bike for purposes of recreational riding on various paved trails in the area as well as possibly commuting to work on days when it is not ridiculously hot. i am guessing some kind of light weight, hybrid thing would work. but i know NOTHING about bikes, pricing, shopping for them, how to pick out what's good, etc. halp!

tehresa, Saturday, 11 June 2011 17:34 (fourteen years ago)

for reference: this store is across the street and the people who work there are reportedly very good/helpful, though it is also rumored to be quite pricey. at any rate, i could certainly hop over for being measured or browsing different types of recommended bikes.

tehresa, Saturday, 11 June 2011 17:36 (fourteen years ago)

can anyone recommend a place in chicago to check out bikes? i am broke. maybe a coop or something

i had a bike that was like a psuedo-mountain bike made for cruising around urban areas, so like some of the bikes posted at the beginning of the thread, and i sorta suspected that ppl had recommended those to me so their bikes look better. im probably crazy, but it seemed like most of my friends had bikes w/ thinner looking skeletons that traversed ground much more quickly. sorta felt like these bikes were recommended to me so they could feel like pros, lol. i do still have the frame from this old bike (the rest of it -- pedals, tire etc -- were destroyed by bike pirates when i left the bike out too long)

lebroner (D-40), Saturday, 11 June 2011 18:38 (fourteen years ago)

Theresa, I really like the two bike stores by the key bridge. The one nearer the bridge is a little less serious roadie store but the people in both of them seem really nice. REI is good too, especially if they have a 20% coupon deal on (plus you get 10% back at the end of the year for being a member). About 50% of the people I know have REI own brand bikes, Novarra.

Worth going to a store and talking to someone about fit. I notice from the website of one of the stores I mentioned above (http://revolutioncycles.com/) that they have a "ladies night" where they'll feed you wine and sell you a bike.

I would recommend a "flat bar road" or hybrid bike unless you find you like drop handlebars. I'd err away from a heavier step through frame with an upright position. You could go singlespeed in DC although I think gears are preferable, IME some of the trails kickup a little and you might not find doing rides like the one along the C&O canal trail to great falls quite so enjoyable. (that said my friend did DC to pittsburgh on a singlespeed in 4 days last year so what do I know)

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 11 June 2011 21:09 (fourteen years ago)

Or you could just spend a big pile of money and emulate Mrs Hincapie

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=xi78s9bab&v=0018sxp1v_8zeOW5m-5MUKBTbVs_SxLnXD9sgGh8LICdJdlHUujENS1AmAo-d-EoyzxbH_BkNdNfIIBOO8kbGlPD-PH6Bis81ymv3A4kbJGO6m9vSoccaVCSLjr2qN-KfMwOCaJZ8puwKQ%3D

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 11 June 2011 21:34 (fourteen years ago)

def don't want a singlespeed (btw i don't live in dc proper - not sure if that makes a difference for you recommendation). for my future commute, part of it would be on the mt. vernon trail, and part on old town alexandria roads.

how does pricing work?

tehresa, Sunday, 12 June 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

check out a civia

all the pretty HOOSes (gbx), Sunday, 12 June 2011 23:33 (fourteen years ago)

how does pricing work?

― tehresa, Sunday, 12 June 2011 17:50 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

you go in trying to spend 3-500 and try not to spend 1500

Revolution seem to be several branches across the DC metro area. I'd stick with my recommendations bike wise.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 13 June 2011 05:40 (fourteen years ago)

maybe i should rephrase. what is a good price range for a decent bike for a beginner who doesn't want to spend mad $ but is willing to spend enough to not have a pos?

tehresa, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:42 (fourteen years ago)

A couple of years ago my wife, a friend in Chicago (with advice from her friend who owns a bike shop), and a friend in Minneapolis (with advice from her bike nerd boyfriend and his pro bike team mechanic brother) all ended up independently getting Kona Dews for their city riding / commuting type bikes. They seem to be solid, decent enough components-wise, and priced pretty reasonably at around $400 or so for the lowest end models.

Since then some other people I know have gotten other Dew variants for the not a road bike but not a mountain bike niche and everyone seems to be happy with them.

joygoat, Monday, 13 June 2011 20:48 (fourteen years ago)

Kona Dew is not a bad choice. You should be able to find something good for around $500 (Dew is RRP $429)

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 14 June 2011 04:28 (fourteen years ago)

hey tza - here's my advice:
1) get a hybrid bike with a rigid fork (not a suspension fork) - suspension on bikes at that price range is overly heavy and doesn't suspend all that much anyway. spend between $350 - $550 and get a bike from one of the big names (trek, giant, specialized, etc). the civia bikes that gbx recommended are very nice as well - not sure how they compare price-wise, though. most bikes under $500 are made in one of only a handful of chinese factories, so how the bike feels to you when you test ride it is more important than any specific parts, or any reviews you find online.

2) all the big name bikes enforce minimum advertised price, meaning that you won't get ripped off from one dealer to the next, or at least not that much. also, it's not just about the bottom line: it's worth $50 extra to go to a shop where the people are helpful and nice and will adjust your brakes or shifting on the spot, as opposed to a shop where the prices are rock bottom, but the salespeople are dicks and tell you that even simple service work requires you to leave the bike for 3 days. see if shops have any deals on accessories (some shops offer 20% off accessories with a new bike purchase, for instance).

3) if you can, and this is a former shop employee speaking, support a local independent bike shop rather than REI. obviously if they're rude or condescending to you, than forget it, but independent shops are getting squeezed by big box stores on one end, chain bike stores on one end, and REI on one end (3 ends?!). novara (REI-brand) bikes are on the level of trek et al at that price range, so if you find the best bike and the best service there, then go for it - but at least give the bike shop a chance.

good luck!

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Monday, 20 June 2011 14:23 (fourteen years ago)

1) get a hybrid bike with a rigid fork (not a suspension fork)

Agree on the LBS thing, too.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 20 June 2011 14:54 (fourteen years ago)

thanks for all this info, dudes! I haven't had time to even start looking yet but sooooon!

tehresa, Thursday, 23 June 2011 04:06 (fourteen years ago)

Not really got any noob questions, just a declaration of noobiness: decided to get a bike. just been eyeing people jealously lately as they ride by on a clement morning. unfortunately i have a lot of outgoings just now with holidays etc. so might be a while until i can fork out the money, by which time i may have missed the summer, well what passes for a summer here. ah well.

oh yeah, and i think i'll probably get a fixie. don't hate me because i'm a hipster.

Introducing the Hardline According to (jim in glasgow), Friday, 24 June 2011 17:53 (fourteen years ago)

put a bird on it

rebel yelp (gbx), Friday, 24 June 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

sorry, i meant brake. put a brake on it

rebel yelp (gbx), Friday, 24 June 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

and a bird

Food Processors Are Grebt (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 24 June 2011 17:55 (fourteen years ago)

haha, i will, and if i go out in heavy traffic i will also don a helmet.

no ipods either.

Introducing the Hardline According to (jim in glasgow), Friday, 24 June 2011 17:56 (fourteen years ago)

Jim, srsly: so many people own bikes but never ride them. Ask around your similarly-sized mates and see if any have a bike they don't use they'd be hapy to lend - you can promise to return it to them fully servcied and rideable, say.

Mark C, Friday, 24 June 2011 20:10 (fourteen years ago)

good idea, but in my case i'm not sure it will be much use, i know some people who have bikes, which they ride and can't lend, and i know some other people who have horrendous mountain bikes they rode when they were teenagers in the 90s sitting in their garages, who are generally at least a few inches shorter than me.

feeling pretty annoyed that we gave away my grandad's old road bike a couple of years after he died, was a flying scot.

Introducing the Hardline According to (jim in glasgow), Friday, 24 June 2011 20:21 (fourteen years ago)

not annoyed, annoyed at myself for not taking an interest at the time, i know some worthy dude got good use out of it.

Introducing the Hardline According to (jim in glasgow), Friday, 24 June 2011 20:22 (fourteen years ago)

Me again. Have paid off my Marin hybrid, having accidentally ridden about 1800 miles on it in the last 12 months. Commute is only a few miles a day but often go out for an hour in the evening or several hours on a weekend.

Now I can get another bike via same salary-exchange Cyclescheme. Am thinking I want to go faster, for longer, mainly on roads, but want flexibility to hit a tow-path and mount a pannier or two (not for weeklong touring, for example, but maybe with camera gear etc) when I want. Wife will allow me to go to about £700; anymore than that and I doubt I'd have a wife anymore. Will be keeping the Marin for pootling around and nipping into town sans cleats (got 2-sided pedals with a flat side)

Have bought and loved SPD pedals and shoes, no problem with them at all. Also fixed bar-ends to the Marin for more flexible hand positioning / help up hills. Don't really like hills but sometimes can't avoid an 850 foot ascent; tend to stick to undulations. Really like the idea of drop-bars. To the point that I'd say they were essential. Likewise double-sided SPDs so I can clip-in faster and not be flipping pedals round and round at traffic lights.

Said all this to the guy in the bike shop, and said I'd been thinking about light tourers. He recommended a tricross; looked at several, tested a couple for a mile on city roads, liked a Specialized Tricross best.

Advice?

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 1 July 2011 11:37 (thirteen years ago)

Aren't Tricrosses really heavy? Can't deny they're functional, though.

I'd go for the raciest bike you can find that can still fit panniers and mudguards. The Genesis Croix de Fer is a cross bike that is prettier and a lot more appealing than the Tricross, but probably dearer (you realise £700 becomes £1000 when you take into account the tax benefits, right?) - I'd get one if I was in that market.

Mark C, Friday, 1 July 2011 11:48 (thirteen years ago)

The Specialized Tricross has an aluminum frame, carbon forks and seat post, and was way lighter than the tourers. A couple of the other tricross bikes in the shop were much heavier. I reckon it was quite a bit lighter than my Marin.

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 1 July 2011 12:23 (thirteen years ago)

And the £700 is definitely my tax-benefit-inclusive limit...

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 1 July 2011 12:24 (thirteen years ago)

Tricross is the Spesh brand name fyi - cyclocross or just cross (or cx) is the type of bike.

Fair dos - Tricross owners do seem, anecdotally, to love their bikes, so I'm sure it'd be a great purchase.

Mark C, Friday, 1 July 2011 12:27 (thirteen years ago)

Aha re; cyclocross. Guy in shop used it the way people might use 'hoover'.

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 1 July 2011 12:33 (thirteen years ago)

Haha! Spesh will be pleased. Which reminds me, I see they've opened a new concept store in Covent Garden - Tempted to pop over there one lunch break.

Mark C, Friday, 1 July 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago)

ok so now i have money. and my new office has a gym w/ locker room!
now i must hunker down and figure out what bike to buy because parking is expensive!

tehresa, Friday, 1 July 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

nick i got a specialized crux recently to race cyclocross on - it's like a less sensible tricross. no rack and guard mounts, double crankset rather than the triple that the tricrosses have got these days, frame angles are a bit different to make the handling livelier. anyway i like it enough that i'm probably going to sell my road bike. the tricross sounds like it'd be right up your alley.

you should also look at more versatile roadies that will probably offer better braking with road calipers than the tricross' cantis, can take rack and guards, but still have a relaxed position - giant defy (aluminium) or kona honky tonk (steel) come to mind.

re-greased bottom bracket (euphemism) (haitch), Saturday, 2 July 2011 03:31 (thirteen years ago)

Hi Nick, ride me

Mark C, Sunday, 3 July 2011 12:34 (thirteen years ago)

bloomspot is running this deal today and it's making me angry at cute hipsters who don't wear helmets.

tehresa, Sunday, 3 July 2011 14:59 (thirteen years ago)

They are beautiful. However, I'm not sure the gearing would deal with Devon hills - we did Peak Hill out of Sidmouth today which is 550ft in half a mile...

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 3 July 2011 16:42 (thirteen years ago)

Just seen a Tricross Sport kitted out with rack, fenders, and Brooks Flyer at one of the bike stations on campus. I want one, but a little more minimal. Oh yes.

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 4 July 2011 13:27 (thirteen years ago)

I have ordered one.

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 7 July 2011 12:42 (thirteen years ago)

i rode this and the 7.5 the other day. 7.5 obviously nicer, and way out of my price range! i think the 7.2 would be fine for my purposes, but dadrza thinks i could do better for the price (it was $529 at my local shop) and thought i should have something with a better derailluer. anyone know of anything comparable?

i am getting antsy to pedal to work now (parking is $6/day!).

tehresa, Tuesday, 19 July 2011 21:51 (thirteen years ago)

i went a-shoppin' with a lady friend of mine on the weekend who's after a bike - she looked at a 7.something at the trek store, but didn't test ride. "i want a ladies' bike, it has to be pretty!"

tza that rear derailleur is the base model shimano one, you'd probably go up to ...probably deore XT as the next step, i think. that's pretty solid gear. maybe see if the shop could do an upgrade deal, they can be flexible with this stuff to make a sale sometimes.

root 86 tram (haitch), Wednesday, 20 July 2011 00:36 (thirteen years ago)

there is a 7.3 that has a deore but it's also another $100+ dollars, and i don't really want to spend that much. dude didn't seem overly eager to wheel and deal... also i think the 7.3 doesn't come in 17", only 17.5, which would probably be too big for me. sigh. this is hard!

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 00:51 (thirteen years ago)

the margin on bikes in that price range is pretty thin, so most shops won't bend over backwards to make the sale for you. honestly, i wouldn't worry about the derailleur - you likely wouldn't notice a difference even if you put on a top-of-the-line model, unless you replaced the shifters, cassette, chainrings, and so on. getting hung up on one component doesn't make sense unless you're spending top dollar and have really specific preferences. if the 7.2 fx wsd fits you, i say buy it.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Wednesday, 20 July 2011 01:36 (thirteen years ago)

right i mean i think that was just one of his concerns, only one that i remember at the moment!
i did google a bit and the bike gets good reviews from people who own it and use it for commuting. honestly i doubt that i would really notice a difference in any of these parts because i don't know anything about bikes! i know the $999 bike felt a lot nicer/smoother to ride but i also wondered if that was psychological.

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 01:42 (thirteen years ago)

was the $999 exactly the same frame size and shape? cuz if not, maybe it just fit better. fit is it!

lukas, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 01:43 (thirteen years ago)

the 7.5 has a carbon fork.

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 01:57 (thirteen years ago)

but both were 17"... not sure if the shape was ~exactly~ the same.

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 01:57 (thirteen years ago)

may not have been psychological - a bike at 2x the price will have better bearings pretty much everywhere, which will make it feel smoother. or, it could have just had less tread on the tires!

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Wednesday, 20 July 2011 02:26 (thirteen years ago)

what y'all think of this? dad sez much better components than the fx 7.2

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 22:58 (thirteen years ago)

except he says i'd need to get a 12-27 tooth cassette and wider tires.
this is hard. and confusing!

tehresa, Wednesday, 20 July 2011 23:04 (thirteen years ago)

it's a nice bike for $600, no doubt about it. it's definitely more of a budget road bike (with flat bars, obv) than a fitness bike - narrow tires, higher gearing (both on the chainrings and cassette), and most likely a more aggressive riding position. carbon fork is very nice, probably the most significant upgrade over the trek... but your dad is right that the components are nicer across-the-board.

definitely worth a test ride - the biggest difference is if you want a bike that skews more toward straight-up road, or if you want a more mellow around-town/fitness bike. other tidbits (to add to your confusion) - trek will likely have better resale value, and service departments may look down on you when you wheel in a scattante, since it's a performance house brand, and most shops detest performance. but neither of those are reasons not to buy it if it is a better fit/feel for you.

long story short, comparing the two is less about individual differences and more about the kind of bike you want to ride. if one feels better than the other, buy it and don't worry about the components/dad [/broken record].

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Thursday, 21 July 2011 02:15 (thirteen years ago)

i dunno about needing a 27 toother at the back, would only come in useful if you were going up pretty steep hills while either touring or carrying a heap of shopping!

Omega-3 fatty acid house (haitch), Thursday, 21 July 2011 04:06 (thirteen years ago)

haha he came back and emailed me later pretty much what ytth said about it being a budget road bike. hmm. also a lot more links to look at. argh.

tehresa, Thursday, 21 July 2011 05:08 (thirteen years ago)

That's really it - you'd be exchanging low-speed comfort for better speed and acceleration. I'd totally prefer the latter but then at the moment I'm commuting on a carbon fibre racing bike.

What do you mean exactly by "it's a performance house brand, and most shops detest performance", Jordan?

Mark C, Thursday, 21 July 2011 13:48 (thirteen years ago)

i dunno about needing a 27 toother at the back, would only come in useful if you were going up pretty steep hills while either touring or carrying a heap of shopping!

― Omega-3 fatty acid house (haitch), Wednesday, 20 July 2011 23:06 (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Not necessary in DC IMO.

Performance Bici is ofcourse a big nasty chain.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 21 July 2011 13:50 (thirteen years ago)

Ah, so it's like Pinnacle/Evans?

Mark C, Thursday, 21 July 2011 13:55 (thirteen years ago)

if pinnacle/evans employs the practice of calling shop owners and saying "either sell your shop to us at a ridiculously low price, or we will open one of our own stores next door"

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Thursday, 21 July 2011 14:30 (thirteen years ago)

yikes that makes me definitely not want to buy a bike there

tehresa, Thursday, 21 July 2011 22:42 (thirteen years ago)

i should qualify that that happened to the owner of the shop i worked for (not in so many words, but there was a shiny new performance in pasadena a few months after he wouldn't sell to them), so i extrapolated that they made a general practice of it. can't confirm it with evidence, though.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Friday, 22 July 2011 03:39 (thirteen years ago)

doesn't seem like too far a leap

tehresa, Friday, 22 July 2011 11:35 (thirteen years ago)

http://cgi.ebay.com/SURLY-LONG-HAUL-TRUCKER-LHT-BICYCLE-BIKE-42-cm-/200631042390?pt=Road_Bikes&hash=item2eb68ac156#ht_500wt_1188

got an hour left...yr fam is in SC, right???

g++ (gbx), Saturday, 23 July 2011 16:14 (thirteen years ago)

prolly too tiny

anyway, main point here: eBay has some tremendous deals, where you can get a lot of bike for like 50% of retail

g++ (gbx), Saturday, 23 July 2011 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

$750 is not my price range! hah.

i am so stressed over this now because i feel like if i don't get what my dad wants he'll never let me hear the end of it. he now thinks trek 7.3 fx is far superior to the 7.2. it is also $150 more. sigh.

tehresa, Saturday, 23 July 2011 16:36 (thirteen years ago)

Have your dad buy the bike for you ...

Virginia Plain, Saturday, 23 July 2011 23:06 (thirteen years ago)

i just looked over the 7.2 vs the 7.3, and i don't see it. if anything, the 7.3 is going to ride more harshly, because it has an aluminum fork (vs steel) and tires with kevlar in the casing. (the advantages to those are lighter weight and less flat tires, respectively). but upgrading a bike model because of nicer tires is dumb, since you can always replace the tires when yours wear out, and it's certainly not worth $150 to go up to the aluminum fork. it's still 8-speed, and a deore vs. an alivio rear derailleur is not even worth considering.

imo, where you really start to see the quality jump is at the 7.5 (carbon fork, 9-speed drivetrain, etc) - but, that's almost $1000. if the 7.3 is out of your price range, i'd forget it - it's a nice bike, but there's nothing you're getting on it that you will specifically miss if you get the 7.2.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Sunday, 24 July 2011 16:34 (thirteen years ago)

hm interesting. he went and rode them both yesterday and said the 7.3 shifts better and brakes worked more smoothly. psychological? who knows.

i am so at a loss. and yeah, the 7.5 is nice but i am not spending $999.

tehresa, Sunday, 24 July 2011 16:45 (thirteen years ago)

could just as easily be chalked up to the person who built it

g++ (gbx), Sunday, 24 July 2011 16:52 (thirteen years ago)

^^^ this.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Sunday, 24 July 2011 17:31 (thirteen years ago)

pro tip, regardless of what you get: ~know your mechanic~

I work on some stuff at home but am basically stupid. Find out who the reputable shops are in yr area (message boards are good for this, but I can prob find out who's good in DC if you want) and pick one and stick with it. Local indy shops reward loyalty ime, and having a wrench you can trust is invaluable. a well-tuned w/e bike >>>> janky fancy bike, 94/7

g++ (gbx), Sunday, 24 July 2011 18:06 (thirteen years ago)

I know my sis has had her bike tuned up from this place several times and seems happy with them. Ed recommended another store too.

tehresa, Sunday, 24 July 2011 18:43 (thirteen years ago)

zomg I bought one! 7.2. I have 14 days to return in case dad freaks. I rode both and for some reason the 7.2 felt better to me, aside from the grips. Yay.

tehresa, Sunday, 24 July 2011 20:56 (thirteen years ago)

btw i had to constantly remind myself that i am a grown woman and can make my own decisions regarding purchases. sigh. i am excited!

tehresa, Sunday, 24 July 2011 21:35 (thirteen years ago)

congrats! you will enjoy it, and you can spend the extra $150 on something you really want, instead of something you've been told to want.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Monday, 25 July 2011 01:26 (thirteen years ago)

yes :)

we went out for a quick ride that turned into 15 mi and it did pretty well!

tehresa, Monday, 25 July 2011 01:30 (thirteen years ago)

radical!

g++ (gbx), Monday, 25 July 2011 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

way to go tehresa! hope you get lots of use and pleasure from yr bike

suicide breaks only work cuz everyone wants you to kill yourself (Hunt3r), Monday, 25 July 2011 11:33 (thirteen years ago)

racks to transport crap on your bike: are there types to avoid, types that are great, etc.?

tehresa, Sunday, 31 July 2011 14:25 (thirteen years ago)

if yr talking commuting/groceries, get a rear rack and some panniers

cargo (cases of beer, puppies) get a flat front

g++ (gbx), Sunday, 31 July 2011 16:41 (thirteen years ago)

The rack will say on it how much weight it can take; remember to check this out and consider how much you'll need to carry.

lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 31 July 2011 16:54 (thirteen years ago)

are there particular brands that are recommended?

tehresa, Sunday, 31 July 2011 16:57 (thirteen years ago)

the very best are old man mountain, but most brands are acceptable. Avoid anything that is not welded, some flat pack racks can be very bad.

Tubus Rack plus ortlieb panniers is a great combo.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 31 July 2011 19:50 (thirteen years ago)

How do I shot lining up the axis of my stem with the front wheel. It always seems to come out a degree or two off-axis. No performance hindrance, but totally maddening.

sous les paves, Thursday, 4 August 2011 19:53 (thirteen years ago)

is all in the knees dude, and using yr nose as a plumbline. (i just spent too long putting Aidan's first pedal bike together)

problem chimp (Porkpie), Thursday, 4 August 2011 21:02 (thirteen years ago)

theresa, I got a good recommend on another DC LBS

http://www.bicyclespacewdc.com/

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 10 August 2011 15:55 (thirteen years ago)

thanks, ed. ugh still so many supplies I need to get (air pump, rack, spare tube, etc.) but I am enjoying riding to work!

tehresa, Friday, 12 August 2011 10:48 (thirteen years ago)

why do they make brake disc screw heads out of butter

ledge, Friday, 12 August 2011 18:23 (thirteen years ago)

... have stripped or nearly stripped the heads of 4 out of 12 screws while trying to change discs. first one i sawed a cut into the head so i could use a regular screwdriver, this actually worked but i did bad things to the disc in the process, despite trying to protect it. the next three - ¯\(º_o)/¯

what is that stuff you can spray on screws to get them out and does it work?

ledge, Friday, 12 August 2011 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

liquid wrench

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Friday, 12 August 2011 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

WD-40 works too. YOu should also get some screw extractors, they cut into the screw and then grab on. these work well:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Boa-Grabit-Damaged-Screw-Remover/dp/B00096JDL2

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 13 August 2011 21:05 (thirteen years ago)

just had to replace the inner tube on my back wheel as there was a hole right at the base of the valve - was i right to assume that i couldn't have fixed that with just a puncture kit? also, is there any use for the old inner tube? do they recycle?

bethnal green and baudrillard (c sharp major), Saturday, 27 August 2011 10:42 (thirteen years ago)

No chance of fixing a hole there. Not sure about recyclability of tubes either. You can make an awful lot of rubber bands out of one, though.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 27 August 2011 13:08 (thirteen years ago)

Em has expressed the desire for a more practical, lighter, faster bicycle than her current one, so that she can come out with me for some exercise rides.

Her current bike is a very fetching Trek Allant:

<img src=http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4153/5111422482_950ddfd43c.jpg>;

which we've added a very nice wicker basket and a beautiful Brooks saddle to recently, but it's now somewhat cumbersome and much more appropriate for pootling along the river or to the shops on than for eatin up the miles with.

I'm thinking something like a Specialized Vita (http://www.specialized.com/gb/gb/bc/SBCBkFamily.jsp?sid=11Vita&scid=1002&scname=Transport%2FFitness) might be the kind of thing she's after, BUT I'm pretty sure she'd hate the look of it - she'd be much more amenable to something tubular-steel-looking, old-school, minimal, and a bit classicist.

Any ideas?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 12:18 (thirteen years ago)

Em has expressed the desire for a more practical, lighter, faster bicycle than her current one, so that she can come out with me for some exercise rides.

Her current bike is a very fetching Trek Allant:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4153/5111422482_950ddfd43c.jpg;

which we've added a very nice wicker basket and a beautiful Brooks saddle to recently, but it's now somewhat cumbersome and much more appropriate for pootling along the river or to the shops on than for eatin up the miles with.

I'm thinking something like a Specialized Vita (http://www.specialized.com/gb/gb/bc/SBCBkFamily.jsp?sid=11Vita&scid=1002&scname=Transport%2FFitness) might be the kind of thing she's after, BUT I'm pretty sure she'd hate the look of it - she'd be much more amenable to something tubular-steel-looking, old-school, minimal, and a bit classicist.

Any ideas?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 12:18 (thirteen years ago)

That spesh is right OTM functionality wise, looks like a derivation of the Roubaix frame so should be comfy but it sure is fugly. Might be worth doing an fit calculator to see what sort of mens bikes she might fit, so much more choice there. Women seem to be particularly ill served in the flat bar road market. There's stuff like the Trek 7.2 that Theresa just bought but that's probably at the heavier end of what you want.

Is she averse to drops because there is a bit more choice? Albeit with slightly patronising names, hello BMC Sparkle.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 13:31 (thirteen years ago)

She'd probably be alright with drops, actually.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 13:45 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think the Vita is ugly at all!

Charge have got a new women's mixte bike that's quite pretty - let me see if I can find it. I like mixte stylings.

Ah, it's single speed, shame. Still, pretty: http://www.leisurelakesbikes.com/images/ProductImages/fullsize/Bikes/Others/11%20charge%20hob.jpg

Mark C, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:05 (thirteen years ago)

Also, I saw one being ridden the other day and was really impressed by it before I even knew what it was. Now, same bike, hub gear, that would be pretty awesome.

Mark C, Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:15 (thirteen years ago)

She'd probably love that - I think she secretly lusts a fixie.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 16:09 (thirteen years ago)

Charge Mixer and Tap look great, high crossbar, though, Alfine or Nexus Hub gears and really clean looking. I like their drop bar road bikes, nothing women specific but the seem to have a variety of geometries so something may work.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:33 (thirteen years ago)

Interestingly charge have a Hob with a 3 speed sturmey archer on their website which might work.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 17:35 (thirteen years ago)

Spoke to her last night (she's away in MCR at a conference this week) and she wants drops.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 06:29 (thirteen years ago)

How much do you have to spend (if it is not a personal question)?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 12:40 (thirteen years ago)

ayo

looking to buy a hybrid most likely. with gears, even though i live in brooklyn.

are there any particular brands that one would recommend embracing or avoiding? i doubt that my demands on the bike will come anywhere near its limits, but i figured i'd ask.

mookieproof, Saturday, 10 September 2011 00:19 (thirteen years ago)

I loved my Marin hybrid. Less enamoured now I e got the Tricross but it's still a great commuter. It's a Larkspur.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 10 September 2011 08:23 (thirteen years ago)

my dad and I are going go a cycle tour through europe; don't know anything about touring bikes. don't want to spend more than £400. am I best trawling the CTC forum for a dawes galaxy or would something like this do the job?

http://www.decathlon.co.uk/riverside-5-mens-id_8156686.html#more_infos

♪ ♫ my baby SBs all day ♫ ♪ (cozen), Saturday, 10 September 2011 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

I'd try and find something without front suspension, unnecessary extra weight.

Can you use cyclescheme to extend the budget a little?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 11 September 2011 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

OK here goes.

I am a total bike noob. I have barely ridden one in the last 15-20 years. Looking to get a cheap, reliable safe bike for my commute. This is Eastside Los Angeles, an emerging bike-friendly part of what must be one of the least bikeable cities anywhere. But luckily my commute is only about 10-15 minutes and can be achieved by avoiding major roads, etc. So what kind of bike and other gear am I looking for? Also how do y'all carry your stuff on you without looking like a complete tool? Are there "bike bags" or what

THANK YOU

Excited about new bike adventures,
AdamRL

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Sunday, 11 September 2011 18:30 (thirteen years ago)

Is it flat? Are you technical / mechanical? How much stuff do you need to carry? What's your budget? Can you imagine yourself getting drawn into either the exercise rush or the cultural accoutrements?

You're probably looking for a flatbar hybrid bike with rear rack and panniers (saddle-bags), but, if it's flat, you might want a single-speed or fixed-gear bike, which is easier to maintain, a little cheaper, and cooler too. If you decide you don't want a rack and panniers, there are so many cool messenger bags and stuff it's crazy.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 11 September 2011 18:59 (thirteen years ago)

Unless it's really hilly it honestly sounds like you could do it on anything you like. I'd get a cheap secondhand (or even better, borrowed), well, bike, make sure it's serviceable and then just ride. If you like it, I promise you'll be back asking how to make the most out of cycling.

The only thing to be concerned about at this stage, other than its roadworthiness, is that it's more or less the right size for you and the saddle's the right height.

Mark C, Sunday, 11 September 2011 21:03 (thirteen years ago)

It's not flat, but not insane hills either. A little undulation, I guess. I don't need to carry too much really - maybe books and a pair of shoes, etc. My budget is small and I'm fine with a used bike. I already exercise quite a bit so could see myself getting into that, but I'm never gonna be a racer or anything like that. Do bike people in warm places carry a change of clothes? Seems like I would arrive everywhere sweaty.

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Sunday, 11 September 2011 21:18 (thirteen years ago)

if you commute in the morning and it's 65 degrees or less, it's totally doable in your work clothes, if you stay very chill. i commute 14 miles each way and i actually wear my office pants and a technical t shirt, then change into undershirt/office shirt when i arrive. no sweat. for the way home, i change into regular shorts (no lycra) and the tshirt again, so i don't have to worry about any sweat in the evening heat. even in high summer, the mornings here are usually low 60s, but afternoons are regularly high 90s.

if you are getting around midday and trips are over 15 minutes, sweat could happen tho.

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Sunday, 11 September 2011 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

Thanks for your help, guys. I will mostly be taking streets to work, many of which do actually have bike paths, and there are some nice paths along the LA River I would like to try. I guess a "city bike" would be fine though if I want to go on the occasional flat dirt track, would I want something else?

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 16:54 (thirteen years ago)

Super-excited about this, btw.

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 16:54 (thirteen years ago)

you'll be fine on the occasional unpaved road unless you buy a true road bike or a hybrid with road wheels.

caek, Monday, 12 September 2011 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

what do u guys think about this place? Does it look good or bad?

http://flyingpigeon-la.com/

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:01 (thirteen years ago)

oh, also, it's harder to wear a dress shirt with a messenger bag on any ride over 15 mins because of sweat- single pannier is superior on the sweat front, but the mounting/unmounting is the penalty.

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:01 (thirteen years ago)

Also how do I find out rules for cyclists in my city/county? I don't want a bike ticket while I'm still fighting a car ticket.

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:03 (thirteen years ago)

lol wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_in_Los_Angeles

usually a cycling group will do a leaflet if the local government does not, e.g. LA http://www.bicyclela.org/Law.htm

caek, Monday, 12 September 2011 17:06 (thirteen years ago)

that bike looks really practical for short hops- i kinda envy basket users since they can just throw what ever bag they have into the basket and get moving.

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:07 (thirteen years ago)

baskets are great. the one thing is if you want to leave your bike for a while you need to take the basket's contents with you, which you have to do with a bag, but at least with a bag you have a bag.

caek, Monday, 12 September 2011 17:09 (thirteen years ago)

Cool, and what about fitness? I run and work out already but how do new bike converts find cycling impacts their personal fitness?

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:09 (thirteen years ago)

i don't get how the sizing on that bike makes sense- it'll only fit those 5'10 and up basically?

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:10 (thirteen years ago)

ORLY? I am 5'8.

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:11 (thirteen years ago)

what's your inseem? it says 32"+ recommended? you may wanna call them.

re: fitness- it's great for general fitness, but if you're already doing other stuff, i don't think puttering around will have much effect other than burning a few hundred extra calories a week.

if you start riding enough that you are cutting runs to ride, and doing say 100+ miles a week, you might lose some running speed/turnover speed in my experience.

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

inseam

traumatic jarts injury hotline (Hunt3r), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

admrl, flying pigeon is legit, had my bike worked on there when i had a mechanical far from home.

lukas, Monday, 12 September 2011 17:15 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, I'm 30". I will call or drop by - I live down the street from them

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Monday, 12 September 2011 17:15 (thirteen years ago)

get this one. throw the lil lady in the front and carpool to work

http://cache0.bigcartel.com/product_images/27792923/300.jpg

jaxon, Monday, 12 September 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago)

adam, i am excited for you! i love riding bike to work :)
still need to get the panniers/rack :(

tehresa, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 01:28 (thirteen years ago)

I don't know what most of these words mean!

I really think I am gonna do this bike thing. though now I am hyper-aware of cyclists that I see on my way to work. There are more and more bike lanes here, but still..some mean streets out there too

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

If you're as much of a noob as you're representing yourself (and I'm sure you're not), read up on roadcraft before getting out there. Learn where in the road you should ride, learn who has right of way in various situations, learn how to be assertive but not aggressive. Learn to avoid danger and how to ride most efficiently.

Mark C, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:05 (thirteen years ago)

I have not really used a bike for about 20 years, so almost as much of a noob as I can be. But yes, I plan to read up. Honestly, I get the feeling that cyclists in many parts of LA are more or less invisible. But my immediate neighborhood is actually really cycle friendly, so it should be no problem to go to farmer's market, bar, bookstore, whatever. I plan on using back streets for my commute where I can, but it will probably be a bit of a learning curve. I'm excited about the LA River bike paths though!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkPlINQln-w&feature=player_embedded

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:11 (thirteen years ago)

i hadn't ridden it probably 15+ years when i got my bike! but it comes back easily. and it's great. i am really conscious about obeying traffic signs and signals because i know that when i am driving it drives me crazy that cyclists DON'T. it makes things so much more dangerous - moreso for them than me!

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 03:42 (thirteen years ago)

I hadn't ridden in over 20 years when I got my bike. Craziness.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:00 (thirteen years ago)

i have a noob commuting question!

if the forecast says there is a 30% chance of scattered t-storms during my evening commute time, should i ride to work tomorrow? i get so nervous about rain!

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:12 (thirteen years ago)

most of the time i don't ride bc of rain forecasts, it never storms til after i'm home. but you know, it's like a murphy's law thing...

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:12 (thirteen years ago)

check the hourly forecast and adjust your commute thusly.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:13 (thirteen years ago)

lol, however:

your daily bicycle log

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:14 (thirteen years ago)

well, the hourly forecast is 30% chance of scattered storms for a 4 hour window, so that's not really an option.

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:14 (thirteen years ago)

which forecast are you using tzy?

i prefer:

weather.com

followed by

accuwx.com

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:26 (thirteen years ago)

weather.com hour by hour

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:31 (thirteen years ago)

accuwx sez i need a premium acct to see chance of precipitation? lamesauce.

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:33 (thirteen years ago)

i think accuwx only goes out 12-24 hours for non-paying users... try again in the am.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 04:38 (thirteen years ago)

The issue here is why are you so nervous about rain? Discomfort, inconvenience, or more worried about road safety? The first two shouldn't be too big a deal on the ride home, as you can jump in the shower, but I understand being less comfortable on wet roads (and in a rainstorm, when visibility is poor as well, it's no fun). I can't pretend riding in the wet is as safe as riding in the dry, but you can of course take precautions to ensure that you at least are being as safe as you can be - ride slower, greater stopping distances, avoid paint and metal on the roads, use lights, that kind of thing.

Mark C, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 09:28 (thirteen years ago)

FENDERS, as Yanks call 'em.

I like riding in a little bit of drizzle sometimes, but then I mainly ride for pleasure rather than to commute.

I'd not ridden in a decade before I got back in the saddle last June. Avoided main roads for a few weeks while confidence built up, love 'em now. Nice and fast! Good visibility!

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 09:43 (thirteen years ago)

xp that's all good advice but i think tza is talking thunderstorms here not london drizzle: high winds, zero visibility, standing water on the roads, etc.

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 09:56 (thirteen years ago)

yeah more concerned w lightning and flooding than getting wet.

tehresa, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 11:30 (thirteen years ago)

how's public transport for your route? do you have buses with those racks on the front?

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 11:34 (thirteen years ago)

Hey, so friend of mine is selling one of these. Great condition, almost half retail price, but maybe a bit more serious than I was thinking.

http://surlybikes.com/bikes/steamroller

Y'all know about what I'm looking for. What's the verdict?

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:18 (thirteen years ago)

those are SS and almost always fixed gear fyi

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:23 (thirteen years ago)

SS?

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

You can build this frame with gears or as a singlespeed or fixed-gear.

am0n, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:30 (thirteen years ago)

xost. you're jewish. you don't want it

jaxon, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:31 (thirteen years ago)

steamroller at half price would be a good score

am0n, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:34 (thirteen years ago)

i think you want some gears in LA

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:34 (thirteen years ago)

especially since you're not so experienced and will be cycling more casually

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:35 (thirteen years ago)

lol btw they messed up the copy on the steamroller page---it's describing the cross-check. the only way you're building a steamroller with gears is with an internally geared hub

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:36 (thirteen years ago)

and caek otm---if you're starting off, and living somewhere with hills, i'd get something with gears. in fact, i would suggest the surly cross-check!

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:37 (thirteen years ago)

LA gears

am0n, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:40 (thirteen years ago)

i don't think he wants drops

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:40 (thirteen years ago)

lol am0n

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

and i dunno, i feel like a steel frame would be a weird place to start

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

cross-checks work fine with risers, it'll just cost extra to have the shop set it up (esp since the the only way you can use the stock shifters is if you mount them on Paul Thumbies which are....expensive)

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

if you can stretch to ~600$ this it would be a good place to start imo http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/road/commute/soho/soho_s/#

but i gather from the shop link that maybe he's looking for something a bit more relaxed and upright like the 3-speed creme?

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:49 (thirteen years ago)

i am sitting in one-on-one bikes right now and i'm certain there is something here for mr real-life

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:51 (thirteen years ago)

So this is a no? I think $600 is too much for me, yeah.

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

ha i linked to the wrong trek model anyway, but yeah, if you're thinking more 300 than 600 they're off the menu anyway

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

This "creme" looks nice

Pizzataco Five (admrl), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:53 (thirteen years ago)

adam, buy my hybrid off me!
http://www.swobo.com/catalog/product_info_b.php?cPath=2448_2459

jaxon, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

THERE'S A BOTTLE OPENER UNDER THE SEAT!

jaxon, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

$400 range

http://store.citygrounds.com/store/product/7864/Linus-Roadster-Classic-Complete-Bike-Black/

am0n, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

creme is fairly cheap but made in europe so is probably hard to find/relatively expensive in the us. there must be similar sub-500 upright position manufacturers over there though if that's what you're after.

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:56 (thirteen years ago)

adam buy jaxon's swobo

remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

that is a cool bike

tebow package scenario (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

we don't live in the same city anymore :(

but if i were to drive down to la i'd bring it w/me

jaxon, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:58 (thirteen years ago)

that bike looks fun

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:58 (thirteen years ago)

it is. hella weird. coaster breaks in back, disc in front. 3 speed internal hub. big tires. i rode the shit out of it. up big hills, long rides. super fun.

jaxon, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 22:02 (thirteen years ago)

i didn't hear much about this schwinn, but it's cheap if you're set on the upright thing, although it looks like it weighs a ton.

caek, Wednesday, 14 September 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

so... after riding home in the rain today (despite a forecast that said otherwise!!) i have towel dried my bike and lubed my chain. anything else i should do to prevent issues? by the time i got home, my breaks were really squeaking.

tehresa, Thursday, 15 September 2011 21:59 (thirteen years ago)

or my brakes. you know, whatever.

tehresa, Thursday, 15 September 2011 21:59 (thirteen years ago)

Brakes will squeal in the wet, particularly when new. Wiping the braking surfaces of debris is good practice

I'm a fan of washing and drying the chain regularly. You can get a chain washer for not much money and I'm a fan of Rock and Roll miracle red degreaser for this.

I eyeball brake wear and tyre sidewalls before every ride and just listen for any other noises.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 16 September 2011 12:40 (thirteen years ago)

(also it is novarra and spoils my rapha/castelli forme)

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 16 September 2011 12:46 (thirteen years ago)

i have the gold rock and roll. is red better? tbh i wondered, when reviewing the options at lbs, if it was all just marketing or if they were really different. i think the guy there said gold would be good for me.

tehresa, Friday, 16 September 2011 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

i guess now i am mostly confused - do you need to grease your chain, or degrease it? or do you just degrease it after every few lubes? i feel like *ack* cathy right now!

tehresa, Friday, 16 September 2011 22:06 (thirteen years ago)

xpost that post ended up in the wrong thread.

both grease and degrease. There are two philosophy's in lube, dry lubing and wet lubing. Dry lubes are waxes that flake off over time so in theory pick up less dirt but need more frequent application. Wet lubes tend to allow dirt to stick but need less frequent re application.

AFAIK gold is a drylube, I use R&R red on the road bike.

I use dry in the summer and wet in the winter and on my commuter bike all the time.

My standard procedure though is to wash the chain at least monthly this removes any grime and metal particles that might promote wear; but yes you degrease and then regrease with clean lube.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 16 September 2011 22:15 (thirteen years ago)

ok. so red to clean, something else to lube.

tehresa, Friday, 16 September 2011 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

I use finish line wet lube, it works, never used dry, maybe next summer.

Ed's right on the chain cleaner, those things are a pleasure to use compared to the old scrub with a toothbrush or take off cOmpletely and soak in paraffin methods....

When you do lube it back up, take your time and lube the chain from abOve, it's the bearings inside that need living not the outer plates. Then take a wad of kitchen paper and run the chain through that to take off the excess that will only pick up more muck, rather than doing anything beneficial.

There's something quite beautiful about a freshly cleaned and lubes chain, especially if it's zipping quietly through a clean smooth drivetrain, sigh.

Think I'll give the felt a deep clean tomorrow.

problem chimp (Porkpie), Friday, 16 September 2011 23:23 (thirteen years ago)

Rock and roll have miracle red cleaner and red lube. Green nipple cream too, FNARR!

http://www.rocklube.com/bicycle.htm

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 16 September 2011 23:27 (thirteen years ago)

Jesus, some awful spelling mistakes in that post, sorry guys, combination of tiredness and smartarse iPhone spelling correction.

problem chimp (Porkpie), Saturday, 17 September 2011 08:50 (thirteen years ago)

sorry pp meant to reply to your text then got sidetracked

def going to trawl CTC; need to start piecing together a potential itinerary

is it shakeymostep? (cozen), Saturday, 17 September 2011 09:22 (thirteen years ago)

Not sure what your aims are but I can recommend Cherbourg or St Malo to Caen. The vendée comes highly recommended (cf. this year's TDF). And some friends recently did the Rhine to Basel IIRC they started somewhere in south East Belgium to take advantage of Eurostar tickets taking you to anywhere in Belgium

http://www.rheinradweg.eu/en/index.php

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 17 September 2011 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

so clipless.....

um, convince me

Crackle Box, Monday, 26 September 2011 13:30 (thirteen years ago)

i have to take two pairs of shoes everywhere?

it just seems like so much hassle.

Crackle Box, Monday, 26 September 2011 13:30 (thirteen years ago)

are you just riding around, goin places? or do you go on "rides"?

i rode clipless on my commuter/work bike for ages and it was great (and also necessary on a brakeless track bike). however, when i was commuting, i was in separate kit anyway, and kept my nice shoes at the office. when i was a messenger, riding my bike was my job.

i recently put BMX platforms on my CX/city bike, and I love it. most of this was motivated by only having one pair of clipless and wanting them on my MTB, but now that i've gotten accustomed to it, i'm p sold on flat pedals as being the best urban option. it's not a big deal to throw my clipless on my bike if i'm going on a proper ride, and not carrying two pairs of shoes (or being a dork in bike shoes all day) is great

(♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 15:21 (thirteen years ago)

Oh god I'd never ride sans cleats now. No way. I don't feel safe without them these days. The shoes I have are fine for walking around in, too, though obviously not all of them are. Also you can get regular trainers with space for cleats these days - http://www.alwaysriding.co.uk/footwear-148/cycling-shoes-218/ - which makes them even easier / more practical.

Cleats make pedalling so much more efficient. They also make me feel much more "at one" with the bike. Hippy bullshit, I know, but it's a definite psychological advantage, I think, to feel more connected to the bike. Physiological, too.

I do hate the term 'clipless', though, it seems are-backwards - cleats are not clipless, it means you DO have clips, unlike regular pedals wjhich are clipless? Unless it comes from toe-clips, which it probably does, but that just seems etymologically screwed. Like "I could care less" vs "I couldn't care less". The former means you do care, ergo wtf, confusion?!

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 26 September 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago)

My commuter bike has double-sided pedals, both clipless and flat. My fun bike has double-sided clipless.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 26 September 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago)

the first time i rode clipless (having never ridden with toeclips) was incredible, i felt like my power output doubled. was an instant convert. as for shoes, you can get less dorky ones, or dual sided pedals you can ride with normal shoes if you really need to wear those dress brogues.

yeah clipless is such a stupid term. should be strapless!

ledge, Monday, 26 September 2011 15:25 (thirteen years ago)

"clipless" comes from toe-clips, yeah. esp since some "cleated" pedals used to have toe clips! (http://www.yellowjersey.org/tocleat.html)

but yeah, it's confusing. lotta ppl just say SPDs, like Kleenex. anyway: clipless pedals are totally great and i love them and you def go faster. but if yr bike is yr main city transportation (ie - not just a commuter) then i think flat pedals are the jam. but that assumes that you ride your bike everywhere all the time, don't want to carry extra shoes, and anticipate situations where bike shoes would be a liability (dancing!). if it's just for to-and-from work, or actual sunday rides or whatever, then go for clipless.

(♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 15:31 (thirteen years ago)

not so dorky cycling shoes?

http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Images/Models/Full/9494.jpg

[Removed Illegal Image]

http://www.hostelshoppe.com/images/products/la_08keen_comuter.jpg

yr dork mileage may vary

ledge, Monday, 26 September 2011 15:42 (thirteen years ago)

http://media1.roseversand.de/product/370/3/3/336352_1.jpg

ledge, Monday, 26 September 2011 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

i feel compelled to point out you would not catch me dead in those sandals

ledge, Monday, 26 September 2011 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/images/products/medium/exustar-sp705-stelvio-leather-spd-touring-commuter-shoes-black-IMG20634EXUSTAR_L.jpg

i commute in these, they are basically bike cop shoes. i leave a couple of pairs of work shoes in my office and change when i get in.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 16:01 (thirteen years ago)

i trimmed off the exustar tab and blacked out the tongue logo ~~stealth~~

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 16:02 (thirteen years ago)

also, i dont want straps on my commuter shoes because, lol ~stealth~, but i want them ez on/off, so i (ninja) replace standard laces with elastic laces (/ninja).

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

Cozen, can't recommend cycling in hollan enough, specifically on the LF1 north sea route. We did hoek to heemskerk on Saturday and it was a real pleasure. Just about 60 miles, maybe 15% of those on actual roads. The cyclepaths through the dunes are just awesome, mostly smooth paving (we had a fair amount of block paving, and a couple of kms of light gravel too). Plenty of views, plenty of pastry stops, courteous drivers when the paths did cross, marvellous.

As for pedals, clipless all the way now, despite the odd "moment" such as the one last night where a straight pull out saved me from a v ignominious fall from stationary.

problem chimp (Porkpie), Monday, 26 September 2011 16:29 (thirteen years ago)

i do about 150 miles a week commuting and nobbing around, then a big most sundays to get rid of hangover

i'd hate the idea of riding on flats, i like having the slot to put my foot in

i see loads of ppl with spds looking a bit flakey clipping in and out and in and out when it's busy around london

i dunno, think im gonna buy some new pedals (mine fell apart the other day) then maybe treat myself to some spds and use them on the long rides and see how that goes

thanks for the shoe recommendations guys

Crackle Box, Monday, 26 September 2011 17:26 (thirteen years ago)

150 miles+ is a shitload to be riding on flats, but imo gbx's assessment of that ish is exactly right

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

i feel compelled to point out you would not catch me dead in those sandals

― ledge

Phew.

Octavia Butler's gonna be piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiised (Laurel), Monday, 26 September 2011 17:51 (thirteen years ago)

sandals are sorta dire, but they have their uses (on somebody else's feet, not mine). keen also makes these:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2515/4114732817_aa5bde58d8.jpg

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 18:03 (thirteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2515/4114732817_aa5bde58d8.jpg

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 18:04 (thirteen years ago)

yeh its obvious really, kinda wanted you all to go GET SPDs you'll never look back thus freeing me of the guilt of spending lots of £££ i don't have on spds and new pedals

Crackle Box, Monday, 26 September 2011 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

i do about 150 miles a week commuting and nobbing around, then a big most sundays to get rid of hangover

i'd hate the idea of riding on flats, i like having the slot to put my foot in

i see loads of ppl with spds looking a bit flakey clipping in and out and in and out when it's busy around london

i dunno, think im gonna buy some new pedals (mine fell apart the other day) then maybe treat myself to some spds and use them on the long rides and see how that goes

thanks for the shoe recommendations guys

see yr sitch is perfect for SPDs. go for it

(♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 19:10 (thirteen years ago)

yah, do it. also, i liked these shoes, very comfortable.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/23/24298840_a4b8876b35.jpg?v=0

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Monday, 26 September 2011 20:07 (thirteen years ago)

I do mostly city riding, usually 3 miles or less per bike ride, and pretty much never go on "rides". I've got toe-clips and love them. Always been curious about clipless but only if I can get practical/comfortable "regular shoes" that I can wear all the time thar happen to have the clip-in plate built in. Doesn't Chrome make these? I have to be able to dance in them and I p much refuse to carry around a spare pair of shoes all the time.

Sandra Bullock violently stabbing a TV dinner (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:06 (thirteen years ago)

i get by with regular pedals on the commutard bike as i don't particularly like having to tote an extra pair of shoes around. but my commute is like 5km each way a day, i'd say go for the SPDs in your case, crackle box.

refugee avocado (haitch), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 07:17 (thirteen years ago)

i have cut a rug in spd shoes

ledge, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 08:31 (thirteen years ago)

Can I make a case for pedals with toe-clips (i.e. straps)? They've become my choice for city commuting as you can use civvy shoes (careful they won't get scractehd up by the clip, mind) while retaining the feeling of security while pedalling.

Mark C, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 09:54 (thirteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsCyC1dZiN8

ledge, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 09:55 (thirteen years ago)

i can't dance in my spds, but anyone you ask will blame me.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:29 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, from what I've read the soles are quite stiff and not really good for everyday non-bike stuff. Maybe I'll just stick with toe clips for now

Sandra Bullock violently stabbing a TV dinner (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:36 (thirteen years ago)

ah, sorry, i sacrificed clarity for my attempt at humor, that was meant to be a joke about my "dancing" more than a fair critique of the spd shoes.

the exustars that i use for commuting are danceable, and they're quite comfy for walking around, they are v. close to feeling like regular shoes. they feel good on the bike btw.

i also have a pair of what are now branded as mavic cruizes (adidas minretts). they are even better on the bike, nice and sporty, but are slightly stiffer and narrower, and while comfortable to walk around in, you are quite aware they are not regular shoes.

both are good for general utility use tho.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 14:59 (thirteen years ago)

Do you have a link to the exustars?

Sandra Bullock violently stabbing a TV dinner (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:41 (thirteen years ago)

i ordered them from UK here:

http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/exustar-sp705-stelvio-leather-spd-touring-commuter-shoes-black-prod20634/

as far as fit goes, they are pretty high volume. i have narrowish feet so i used some cushion insoles to take up space.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 15:54 (thirteen years ago)

what pedals w/ toe clips you got mark c???

i've had two lots and they've both fallen apart in less than 6 months. most recent ones had a metal clip that made a "you're a shit cyclist noise" if it ended up scraping against the road, so i didn't like them v much

Crackle Box, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 12:59 (thirteen years ago)

recently I have been intrigued by these. Don't really have a use for them, not exactly going to ride the BMC to a bar.

http://compare.ebay.com/like/200496881373?var=lv<yp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&var=sbar&_lwgsi=y

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 28 September 2011 13:25 (thirteen years ago)

Crackle, I have these: http://www.wiggle.co.uk/mks-sylvan-track-pedals/ - They're not the smoothest ever, even afetr I took them apart and regreased the bearings, but they actually work fine and haven't fallen apart under several thousand miles of use.

Mark C, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 15:20 (thirteen years ago)

what are the best otp touring bikes for £700-1000? surly LHT? on-one pompetamine?

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━sɹǝʞɹɐɯ━┻ (cozen), Sunday, 2 October 2011 12:03 (thirteen years ago)

I think the cross-check may be a viable alternative to the lht and a wee bit more versatile. Or... Could you put a kaffenback together for that price?

problem chimp (Porkpie), Sunday, 2 October 2011 15:14 (thirteen years ago)

Check the Dawes Range as well

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 October 2011 15:24 (thirteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

OK so I got my bike yesterday. It is a super nice vintage Bobbin city bike. I got bag and lock and helmet and lights and a nice bell too. It was fucking expensive. Then I rode home in the dark and it was HARD! Why didn't you guys tell me?

Still, can't wait to go home and try it again, but hills that are small in car are big for bike. This will take a little getting used to,,,

simile for me now (admrl), Thursday, 27 October 2011 20:40 (thirteen years ago)

not a noob question, more of a noob update

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Thursday, 27 October 2011 20:44 (thirteen years ago)

Pics or the proverbial.

Mark C, Thursday, 27 October 2011 22:57 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.bobbinbicycles.co.uk/

seriously though hoe do you do hills? i have 5 gears

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Thursday, 27 October 2011 23:31 (thirteen years ago)

HOW do you

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Thursday, 27 October 2011 23:31 (thirteen years ago)

just keep going up hills, it gets easier every time

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

ugh

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:12 (thirteen years ago)

also seat hurts.

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:12 (thirteen years ago)

bike looks nice though. I feel like I must look at total noob to everyone in sight.

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:13 (thirteen years ago)

it gets better...

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:13 (thirteen years ago)

ok thank you

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:20 (thirteen years ago)

my advice is "pedal faster"

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:21 (thirteen years ago)

no, I tried

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:22 (thirteen years ago)

it's a city bike not one of your boy racer things

Tevez Sr. (admrl), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:22 (thirteen years ago)

yeah no that's good, a lot of the racers around here like to train on heavier bikes

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 00:23 (thirteen years ago)

lol

caek, Friday, 28 October 2011 00:24 (thirteen years ago)

adam they are experienced. i am also a newbie. but i will say, they are right! hills and seat comfort issues get better every time. :) yay for your bike!

tehresa, Friday, 28 October 2011 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

adamrl if you don't have toe clips get them NOW, they will change your life and turn your bike into a totally new machine

http://www.parktool.com/uploads/images/blog/repair_help/feet_100.jpg

biking w/o toe clips is the WOOOORST

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 03:27 (thirteen years ago)

that is def on my list!

tehresa, Friday, 28 October 2011 03:52 (thirteen years ago)

I cannot cannot cannot speak highly enough of them. They are p cheap, too! Especially considering how fucking amazing they are.

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 04:02 (thirteen years ago)

Not only can you pull up with the opposite foot while pedaling but you can also push forward!

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 04:03 (thirteen years ago)

Steve, have you heard of clipless pedals? You'd love them!! That said, I have toe clips on my fixie which I commute on and they are pretty good for the job. It's nice sometimes not to have to take special bike shoes everywhere you go.

Admrl, 5 speeds isn't terribly generous, but for hills, go into the lowest gear and see how it feels. If it's too easy, go up one, if it's too hard, you'll have to pedal standing up, or just grind your way up. You may have to get off and walk if it gets too much, there's no shame in it. There's no secret to it (other than "pace yourself" - oh, and get into the right gear *before* the going gets tough, otherwise you'll lose momentum and gain knackeredness unneccesarily - but if the gearing's not right then even this may be irrelevant), but the good news is, as everyone says, it gets much easier pretty quickly if you keep at it.

Mark C, Friday, 28 October 2011 10:24 (thirteen years ago)

Theresa, there has been a recall on Trek 7.2 FX bikes, not sure if yours counts as a '2012' model but probably worth checking. Your saddle may fall off 'unexpectedly'.

http://www.cyclelicio.us/2011/trek-district-fx-recall-2012/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cyclelicious+%28Cyclelicious%29

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 28 October 2011 12:37 (thirteen years ago)

Xp yeah, I've been looking into them recently but most all of my riding is commuting around the city and never, like, long recreational rides. Everyone's told me to just stick with clips

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 13:57 (thirteen years ago)

Are there smaller toe clip cages for women? I haven't changed mine out yet, I think they're "mediums" but they're way too big for me, and I remember having Smalls but they were still too far out in front.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:09 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, there are - for e.g. http://www.amazon.com/Avenir-Toe-Clip-Strap-Set/dp/B002BVXZFS/ref=pd_sbs_sg_3 come in S/M.

Mark C, Friday, 28 October 2011 14:15 (thirteen years ago)

I just said that both men's mediums and men's smalls were too large. Have seen "small" estimated as men's US shoe size 6-7. My size is on the small size of a men's 5, so "S/M" is not going to work.

Also I didn't specify before but I won't put plastic cages on.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

Aw, why not?? You make plastic cage sad!!!

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:44 (thirteen years ago)

Because they look cheap and breakable, and also ugly, that's why. Sorry, plastic!

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:48 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe look into those sturdy velcro straps that seem to be getting popular?

http://urbanvelo.org/hold-fast-frs-review-straps-for-bmx-pedals/

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:49 (thirteen years ago)

Those look intersting. Still have some reservations (bmx pedals? $60??) but would consider.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 14:53 (thirteen years ago)

theres a small and medium of these:
http://www.amazon.com/MKS-Steel-Bicycle-Pedal-Clips/dp/B005I6D4EA

lol waggoner (am0n), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:01 (thirteen years ago)

I put those exact cages on my last bike, in size small. They worked all right, but like I said, could have been smaller. So basically the answer to my question is: no, nobody makes toe-clips in women's sizes.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago)

Good design and good price, though.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:03 (thirteen years ago)

what about reshaping the smalls w/ pliers

lol waggoner (am0n), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:10 (thirteen years ago)

prob take more than pliers tho, nm

lol waggoner (am0n), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:11 (thirteen years ago)

I just did a bit of googling and stumbled upon these Power Grips toe straps; can anyone tell me about these?

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:19 (thirteen years ago)

Also laurel maybe look into kids sized ones?

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:20 (thirteen years ago)

I put those exact cages on my last bike, in size small. They worked all right, but like I said, could have been smaller. So basically the answer to my question is: no, nobody makes toe-clips in women's sizes.

They make them in pink, what more do women want? Them to actually fit?

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

I've seen simple neoprene straps used for mountain biking, and heard that they had some success for reg street use as well, but mostly (as you can see in this thread) people tend to recommend clipless systems as a way to resolve all problems with toe-clips.

WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Friday, 28 October 2011 15:28 (thirteen years ago)

i know some hipster dudes love power grips (feetbelts lol), and they certainly make sense in theory. they've gotten popular enough to spawn a couple other competing brands, at least. never used em though. keep yr eyes peeled for some kid that has em on their bike and ask?

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, 28 October 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

For a city bike, I would recommend either platform pedals or toe clips. Clipless for short city rides seems to be oversolving a simple problem.

Toe clips have there merits but they are far from necessary.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 17:20 (thirteen years ago)

"their" sorry, haven't had coffee yet, remedying that asap.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 17:24 (thirteen years ago)

Toe clips being far from necessary is total BS; they are wonderful in every way!! I mean not just for going up hills or steady inclines but also accelerating from a stop is so much faster w/ clips.

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 28 October 2011 17:41 (thirteen years ago)

I agree to disagree. I'm much faster from a stop on platforms than I am with clips/clipless.

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 28 October 2011 17:43 (thirteen years ago)

wow power grips were big in like 1990 didn't know they still made them.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Friday, 28 October 2011 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

i'd agree w/ shasta only becuz i never seem to get my left foot in the first try, that stumble wasting precious cat 6 seconds

lol waggoner (am0n), Friday, 28 October 2011 18:09 (thirteen years ago)

I'm waiting for someone to come up with the stylish work shoe that accepts a look cleat and is still walk able. I will be king of the cat 6ers

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 28 October 2011 18:44 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/79/1227-3472-full-srt707-79.jpg

come on, it says for formal or casual use right there

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Friday, 28 October 2011 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

thanks, ed! i think mine is 2012! i will have to go look at those bolts. i wonder if the dealer was planning on alerting customers...

tehresa, Friday, 28 October 2011 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

Ed will the dromarti sportives not take look cleats?

problem chimp (Porkpie), Friday, 28 October 2011 22:25 (thirteen years ago)

Ed will the dromarti sportives not take look cleats?

it was a somewhat facetious comment. Most days I don't bother with cleats, commute is PO short right now. Just stand on the eggbeaters.

Maybe I should add this project to the spd compatible high heel e' is on at me to create

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 28 October 2011 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

a friend uses power grips and loves them. like color anodized components, hipsters have revitalized a once forgotten fad from the 90's. supposedly power grips are easier to get into than toe clips - i've never used either, so i don't know. my preferred urban setup (i have have said this before, so sorry if i'm being redundant) is a crank brothers mallet - cleat for longer rides, regular shoe on the pins for everything else.

and you are a part of everything and everything is like melting (ytth), Saturday, 29 October 2011 19:24 (thirteen years ago)

I'm curious about the feetbelts, mostly so I could wear a greater variety of shoes.

lukas, Saturday, 29 October 2011 20:15 (thirteen years ago)

Struggling to get tyre onto wheel, bought a large screwdriver-like tyre lever for super bonus leverage. Net effect: two inner tubes shredded. Ok, not a question, but I sure feel like a fucking n00b.

ceci n'est pas un nom d'affichage (ledge), Friday, 4 November 2011 14:35 (thirteen years ago)

Get a tyre bead jack or try a different tyre.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 4 November 2011 19:34 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, i mean i managed in the end with 5 (five) different plastic tyre levers, but tyre bead jack look intrestin.

ceci n'est pas un nom d'affichage (ledge), Friday, 4 November 2011 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

my latest randonneurs were ridic tight, but quickstiks never fail me.

yeah, niche-y, that's what i meant (Hunt3r), Friday, 4 November 2011 21:38 (thirteen years ago)

OK guys

So I have been riding for about a week now, getting better. It is super fun but I am not yet very confident on the roads. I am enjoying it but now I hate drivers. Does that make me a real cyclist?

Also my bike is beautiful and awesome but very heavy. And I feel stupid in my helmet, but I wear it.

gAng ReLated (admrl), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:55 (thirteen years ago)

I am enjoying it but now I hate drivers. Does that make me a real cyclist?

Welcome, friend.

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:11 (thirteen years ago)

hatin is bad

dead precedents politics as usual (Hunt3r), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:13 (thirteen years ago)

everyday I'm
http://i-cdn.apartmenttherapy.com/uimages/ohdeedoh/033109strider.jpg

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 10 November 2011 02:45 (thirteen years ago)

lol i hate runners! but i find that hilarious because when i run i hate bikes! what it boils down to is that the path i ride on for half my commute is just too popular/congested. last weekend we went for a recreational ride and it was AWFUL trying to ride by groups of 15 ppl out for a leisurely stroll. i totally believe in mixed use trails and that everyone should get to enjoy them... it's just.. hard in reality.

tehresa, Thursday, 10 November 2011 03:17 (thirteen years ago)

Hating drivers is normal, but it's healthier for all concerned if you can downgrade it to some combination of fearing/suspecting/not trusting drivers.

Why do you feel silly in a helmet?

Mark C, Thursday, 10 November 2011 11:34 (thirteen years ago)

I find the best thing re cars is to be confident and assertive and polite.

tehresa, Thursday, 10 November 2011 11:56 (thirteen years ago)

I feel silly in a helmet becuase there are no good helmets. They add this stupid extra bulk to yr head and they don't match the rest of my outfit, which displeases me.

gAng ReLated (admrl), Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:46 (thirteen years ago)

This lady is riding a green version of my bike and she is not wearing a helmet!

http://www.weekendnotes.com/images/bobbin-2.jpg

gAng ReLated (admrl), Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:47 (thirteen years ago)

She seems nice though =)

gAng ReLated (admrl), Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:47 (thirteen years ago)

first result for "fancy bike helmet"

http://www.yakkayshop.com/Navigering/Emnemenu/helmets.aspx

lukas, Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:48 (thirteen years ago)

I like that first one, actually. This is the second time in two days that I have been associated with the term "fancy" on ILX. What do you think it means????

gAng ReLated (admrl), Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:51 (thirteen years ago)

Bern helmets are pretty great. It is extremely stupid to compromise yr safety bcz you'll "look dorky" riding your bike.

Parker Posey as herself dancing to house music in NYC in 1995 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 10 November 2011 20:32 (thirteen years ago)

Having come off my bike a few weeks ago, and had my head bounce (albeit quite softly) off the tarmac, always wear one if you're anywhere near traffic or going to be doing more than about 10mph.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 10 November 2011 20:59 (thirteen years ago)

It is extremely stupid to compromise yr safety bcz you'll "look dorky" riding your bike.

^^^otmx10000000000

tehresa, Friday, 11 November 2011 02:12 (thirteen years ago)

Oh no, I always ride with a helmet. I'm just super-fussy about my hair.

So yeah I'm riding to and from work now at least half the week. It's about 4-5 miles with some hills and rush hour traffic, takes me around 20-25 minutes. I also work right next to a state park so sometimes for a break at work I go and do a circuit on the bike paths there, it is super fun. My new thing is that I am good at going really really slow now, and I have started to be brave enough to take my hands off of the handles and do things with them.

So what I have been doing now is riding my bike over to this little independent deli at lunch and buying a sandwich and riding the sandwich back to these picnic tables under this bridge and parking my bike and eating the sandwich and reading a book. It feels like the early twentieth century or something!

Also there is a bike shop at work and they have a pump I am going to learn to use.

Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Friday, 18 November 2011 19:15 (thirteen years ago)

One thing that confuses me is this

when there are two lanes but I want to take a left turn, how soon can I move into the left lane and what part of that lane should I ride in until I turn, the far left, the far right or the middle?

Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Friday, 18 November 2011 19:18 (thirteen years ago)

i stay to the far right of the turn lane if there's room, but if it's not safe i take the whole lane. once i'm through, i go back to the right side in that case.

dead precedents politics as usual (Hunt3r), Friday, 18 November 2011 19:36 (thirteen years ago)

Oh damn biking in LA would be tricky. I'm spoiled with Philly and it's vast majority of one-way/one-lane streets.

Sally Field hysterically shrieking "Gloria fucking SWANSON!!!" (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 18 November 2011 20:54 (thirteen years ago)

I thought biking in LA was pretty decent actually. Way easier than SF. Long distances sorta balanced by nice weather.

Oh man here I go missing LA again. Last summer I had plenty of time to ride and pretty much every journey east would take me by Tacos Leo ...

lukas, Friday, 18 November 2011 21:04 (thirteen years ago)

Caught a flat! In the shop now, getting it fixed!!

Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Saturday, 19 November 2011 00:43 (thirteen years ago)

Now's the time to learn how to change a tube!

Mark C, Saturday, 19 November 2011 09:18 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, well luckily I caught it only a 10 min walk from Flying Pigeon, so I walked there and had a cold blueberry soda and checked out some Bern helmets while the lady fixed my wheel and realigned my gears. See how...bike I am??

Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Saturday, 19 November 2011 18:35 (thirteen years ago)

Aren't those helmets nifty?

Sally Field hysterically shrieking "Gloria fucking SWANSON!!!" (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 20 November 2011 02:52 (thirteen years ago)

four months pass...

Opinions sought on my n00b idea of changing my compact chainset from 50-34 to 46-34. Just don't use the high gears that much and when cruising always find i wanted to cross the chain massively.

ledge, Thursday, 29 March 2012 08:28 (thirteen years ago)

What's your cog range? I'd look at expanding that first.

Also -> ride faster.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 29 March 2012 12:43 (thirteen years ago)

more detail on expanding cog range plz. does that mean new rear cassette? will it fix chain crossing problem?

pretty happy with my leisurely sunday rider stance tbh.

ledge, Thursday, 29 March 2012 13:30 (thirteen years ago)

I don't understand why you have a chain crossing problem! Is your derailleur bent or something?

Mark C, Thursday, 29 March 2012 14:25 (thirteen years ago)

nah, i just normally find myself on the middle/low end of the cassette when on the big front ring? idk maybe my indexing is a bit iffy as well. maybe i take it too easy. idk.

ledge, Thursday, 29 March 2012 14:31 (thirteen years ago)

Chain crossing should really be an issue you may want to trim your from derailleur a little.This varieties from system to system how it is achieved and from brand to brand how much is necessary. SRAM is notorious for needing lots of trimming (apparently fixed in new Red)

As far as rear cogs go you can mess around to have lower gears come sooner in the range. This is SRAMs range, if you move from an 11-26 to an 11-32 then you'll hit the lower gears a cog sooner. Move to a 12-26 and you get the higher gears a cog sooner but the low gears stay the same.

11-23: 11-12-13-14-15-16 -17-19-21-23,
11-26: 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-21-23 -26,
11-28: 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28,
11-32: 11-12-13-15-17-19-22-25-28-32,
12-25: 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25,
12-26: 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-26,
12-27: 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-24-27,
12-28: 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-22-25-28,
12-32: 12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28-32

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 29 March 2012 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

interestin'. doing another ride this sunday, will try and clarify the problem more accurately and figure something out from there.

ledge, Friday, 30 March 2012 08:52 (thirteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

just saw this on craigslist, this is like beyond 'noob' territory going into 'what on earth are u thinking':

http://oi43.tinypic.com/2j0nihj.jpg

╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮ (am0n), Friday, 20 April 2012 19:29 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.bocyc.eu/gallery/big/bocyc_05-quatro.jpg

^^ savages

╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮ (am0n), Friday, 20 April 2012 19:38 (thirteen years ago)

wait are we talking abt handlebars?

Time, a group with Jam and Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 22 April 2012 01:54 (thirteen years ago)

the *dropped* handlebars?

Time, a group with Jam and Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 22 April 2012 01:54 (thirteen years ago)

If we want to talk savages

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qb8QktenUts/T41xMv9GE4I/AAAAAAAAaS4/lGpxg8lxiL0/s1600/scott.jpeg

courtesy of bikesnob

http://delaware.craigslist.org/bik/2947323490.html

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 22 April 2012 02:02 (thirteen years ago)

idgi

Time, a group with Jam and Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Sunday, 22 April 2012 02:08 (thirteen years ago)

i bet the guys at the bike shop LOVED this dude.

how did we get here how? (ytth), Sunday, 22 April 2012 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

xp stevie, this is the cycling equivalent a post selling a gourmet meal with lines like "i had the chef pour heinz ketchup all over it for better flavor"

how did we get here how? (ytth), Sunday, 22 April 2012 02:11 (thirteen years ago)

someone in delaware is trolling, and doing it well

catbus otm (gbx), Sunday, 22 April 2012 03:52 (thirteen years ago)

wait are we talking abt handlebars?

― Time, a group with Jam and Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, April 21, 2012 9:54 PM

the *dropped* handlebars?

― Time, a group with Jam and Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, April 21, 2012 9:54 PM

we're taling about the dropped handlebars that are flipped upside down. and in the case of the first one upside down AND the stem and handlebars are BACKWARDS

╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮ (am0n), Sunday, 22 April 2012 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

courtesy of bikesnob

http://delaware.craigslist.org/bik/2947323490.html

― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, April 21, 2012 10:02 PM

haha i <3 craigslist. and bikesnob.

╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮ (am0n), Sunday, 22 April 2012 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

And the shop adapted a kickstand to fit the carbon fiber frame

am0n, Sunday, 22 April 2012 22:07 (thirteen years ago)

had me LOLing at "replaced handlebars for better control"

that thing is already somewhat infamous

http://thedailygrind.robdamanii.com/2012/04/11/facepalm-files-the-sad-scott/

the late great, Sunday, 22 April 2012 22:13 (thirteen years ago)

whoops didn't see it was on bikesnob that explains the infamy

the late great, Sunday, 22 April 2012 22:15 (thirteen years ago)

is that really sadder than a full race trim scott creaking under a 220 pound lawyer on some charity ride

a single goddamn marshmallow fucked me for LIFE (Hunt3r), Sunday, 22 April 2012 23:13 (thirteen years ago)

lol

am0n, Sunday, 22 April 2012 23:50 (thirteen years ago)

http://baltimore.craigslist.org/bik/2967945092.html

is that price a typo or

am0n, Monday, 23 April 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

USE BIKE MURRAY TOURIN MTN BIKE FRONT SUSPENSION SYSTEMS just need clean up it ...

am0n, Monday, 23 April 2012 16:24 (thirteen years ago)

two months pass...

Hey does anyone have any general tips for looking for second hand steel road bikes?
This is the kind of thing I am looking at. Is there anything I should be looking out for apart from general fit and feel?

Vasco da Gama, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 09:44 (twelve years ago)

In addition to looking at the components, it's worth googling the tubing, I think, you can get an idea of how good the bike was in a particular year. Not all steel is equal even under similar paint jobs. You can cut through a lot of the bullshit surrounding the brand and it being 'vintage' and the like.

So looking up "Columbus Aelle" gives me

http://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/columbus/columbuschart.htm

It's at the bottom end of the columbus range, largely un butted. The ride will be comfortable to the point of being squishy. €420 seems pretty high price for something that started life as a budget racer.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 17 July 2012 16:33 (twelve years ago)

VdG, are you in London and might you be interested in an 80s Holdsworth tourer to fit approx 6 footer? Needs a clean and a service but it was fully functional 5 years ago and has been in a shed ever since.

Mark C, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 20:58 (twelve years ago)

Mine's a mid-level Reynolds 531 10-speed tourer in (dirty, scratched) white. Needs a lot of tlc but is mechanically in decent nick.

Mark C, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 21:00 (twelve years ago)

Naa I'm in Germany

Thanks ed, I'll try and inform myself about frames a bit.

Vasco da Gama, Tuesday, 17 July 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/18/world/europe/in-denmark-pedaling-to-work-on-a-superhighway.html

"The plan has received widespread support in a country whose left- and right-leaning lawmakers both regularly bike to work (albeit on slightly different models of bicycle)."

what are the "slightly different models" here? anyone know?

caek, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 11:50 (twelve years ago)

http://i955.photobucket.com/albums/ae31/Foxx-Dot-Com/4chan/1254517783743.jpg

ledge, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:20 (twelve years ago)

loool

caek, Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:30 (twelve years ago)

Massive noob question here - please don't laugh. I currently have a mountain bike/ATB which I mainly use for road cycling to and from work on a fairly flat road. I'm constantly getting overtaken by racers (and even Bromptons) as my fat-arsed tyres drag themselves along the road. I'm thinking of getting skinnier tyres with a smoother tread. Can I simply change the tyres or will I need to do more than that (e.g. change the wheels themselves or something like that?). Recommendations are also very helpful!

Quickly, take hold of my hand, asshole! (dog latin), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:28 (twelve years ago)

yes you can simply change the tyres. check the diameter of your current tyres but they'll almost certainly be 26". can't recommend anything in particular but try these links:
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Categories.aspx?CategoryID=740
http://www.wiggle.co.uk/cycle/mtb-slick-tyres/

ledge, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:38 (twelve years ago)

thanks ledge. yeah i'm certain they're 26"

Quickly, take hold of my hand, asshole! (dog latin), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:39 (twelve years ago)

the tire wall should have the size written on it, e.g. 26x2 (26" diam, 2" wide). what width do you currently have?

caek, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:40 (twelve years ago)

not near my bike right now. i'll check though.

Quickly, take hold of my hand, asshole! (dog latin), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:41 (twelve years ago)

if in doubt go to the bike shop and tell them you want to change to slicks. they'll sell you ones that will fit.

caek, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:43 (twelve years ago)

I never learned to ride, I want to now. Just recreation on city streets and parks, pretty flat, $500-$600 budget (want to buy new so the shop can make appropriate adjustments, etc.).

Is there a suitable Trek? I read about the Felt Glassell and that sounded interesting too.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:16 (twelve years ago)

Also Kind of interested in a three-wheel recumbent tbh.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:20 (twelve years ago)

dl, more than you would ever need to know about rim and tyre widths (with a handy chart near the end under 'width considerations':

http://sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html#width

ledge, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 22:53 (twelve years ago)

on the three wheel recumbent, depends how you're using it. they have a very wide stance, which makes maneuvering anywhere around traffic hard. also, they are very low and i've been told, therefore more likely to be hit by cars, thus the common use of flags for recumbents. my general attitude is, if you need a recumbent to get on a bike, go for it, but if you don't, skip it.

for the sake of future hipstorians (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:04 (twelve years ago)

hay hay i got some slicks. only had time to change the front one and it seems good. problem is, the front wheel quick release axle kind of fell apart while i was taking it off. i put it back together best i could, but i had to guess how because nowhere on the internets could i find anything that told me e.g. washer, washer, spring, fork, fork, spring, nut (think that's the order i put em on). so i hope i haven't bollocksed it up. back tyre this weekend. uh ohs...

sorry for asshole (dog latin), Friday, 10 August 2012 08:31 (twelve years ago)

DL - you might be better off going to a bike shop and getting them to check your quick release, you really don't want your wheel to fall out while you're riding.

I've been to Suffolk (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:18 (twelve years ago)

quite right indeed.

sorry for asshole (dog latin), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:19 (twelve years ago)

dunno about that, it ain't rocket science

http://www.montaguebikes.com/assets/images/ownermanual/standard-labeled-quick-release.jpg

kmfdotm (ledge), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:20 (twelve years ago)

that's what i need! thanks ledge, you're a ledge!

sorry for asshole (dog latin), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:33 (twelve years ago)

ha

caek, Friday, 10 August 2012 13:34 (twelve years ago)

except the drawing's missing two washers there. never mind, i'm sure i got it right by looking at the back wheel.

sorry for asshole (dog latin), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:34 (twelve years ago)

washers eh, what's the point in them.

i was having terrible trouble opening a super tight quick release lever the other day. my super bike nerdy friend - not quite up to the level of building his own wheels but i wouldn't put it past him - fixed it in a jiffy by turning the lever a full turn without opening it (anticlockwise i presume), then it popped open no trouble. magic!

kmfdotm (ledge), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:37 (twelve years ago)

washers probably sit between the nut and the spring at either end, but most quick release assemblies don't have them

mod night at the oasis (NickB), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:39 (twelve years ago)

i was having terrible trouble opening a super tight quick release lever the other day

my lo-tech solution to this is always to whack it open with my pump placed through the wheel

mod night at the oasis (NickB), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago)

mine's one of those special quick releases that only open if the bike's upside down so that's maybe something to do with it.

sorry for asshole (dog latin), Friday, 10 August 2012 13:40 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.