I don't shoot nearly as much as I did in school, even though I'm not paying $5/roll of Tri-X and a dollar or more for every sheet of 11x14 paper I fucked up. Trying to work on giving myself more projects and get insurance so I can carry everywhere without worrying about getting mugged. Selling off everything but one body and one lens, the way I started shooting.
Primary lens/body for the last couple of years has been D700+24-70G zoom - which is a fine lens, but weighs a ton on its own and is pretty awkward to carry. I've also still got my 5D Mk I in desperate need of cleaning and a 35L
35mm is far and away my favorite focal length and my old 35L is the best lens I ever used, so that's the focal length I'm running with.
I see three options:
D700 plus new Nikon 35/1.4G - paid for with the proceeds of finally selling everything else, keep the D700's high ISO capability
5D II plus 35L - paid for by selling the Nikon kit and 5D - lose some ISO capability plus AF ability (though I really only use the center point and recompose), gain awesome video (though, honestly, I don't need another diversion) and more megapixels for cropping and enlargement (bonus - it's amazing how cheap and easy 16x24 and 20x30 prints are today - I can't imagine what it would have been like doing those in the chemical darkroom on a regular basis)
cleaned 5D and 35L, bank what I get for selling everything else, buy the 5D III or whatever comes out next year
None of these is an obvious choice, tbh. My favorite digital images were largely shot with the 5D+35L, but I think that has more to do with carrying the combo more than I have D700/zoom. D700/35G would weigh pretty much the same as Canon/35L.
Poll Results
Option | Votes |
5D II + 35L | 2 |
D700 + 35G | 1 |
5D I + 35L + upgrade to 5D III or whatever comes out later | 0 |
― boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 03:45 (fourteen years ago) link