The idea of creativity for its own sake - of art as something without
purpose - is fairly recent. It's born, surely, out of the same spirit
of individualism which animates (or has been co-opted into animating)
the money-oriented society that is often cast as creativity's enemy.
Pre-capitalist and non-capitalist societies have traditionally been
suspicious or dismissive of art which wasn't designed to improve in
some religious or social sense. How do we disentangle the romantic
and the capitalist threads - if, that is, we need to?
And if there is a social pressure to be creative, is it something
that's being encouraged in place of a social pressure to be
collective?
― Tom, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link