i might try installing it on the dell, be interesting to compare performance for it
― -- (688), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:16 (eighteen years ago)
yea, theres lotsa different ways of keeping the cpu down, but, you know, "deleting any system-draining plug-ins", isnt really what im looking to do!
― -- (688), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:21 (eighteen years ago)
― zappi (joni), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:32 (eighteen years ago)
― The Redd And The Blecch (Ken L), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
you know what i'm talkin about. when you try to turn the volume up or down with the keyboard and it responds like 10 seconds after you press the button, and moves one tick at a time, making a broken "thup thup thup thup thup" sound.
FOR YEARS NOW
(maybe this has changed with the intelbooks but AAARRRGH)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 23:12 (eighteen years ago)
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 23:56 (eighteen years ago)
CAN NOT CTACH A BREAK.
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 18 January 2007 02:59 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.internet-nexus.com/2007/01/im-mac-im-pc.htm
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Monday, 29 January 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Monday, 29 January 2007 23:58 (eighteen years ago)
― milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
-- jay blanchard"PC"
― roger goodell (gear), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 02:02 (eighteen years ago)
the "genius" was all "oh yeah, why would you need a travel drive, you can just use your wireless w/ .mac" ... i worry that this company panders a bit too much to the "sit around in a cafe doing fucking nothing all day" crowd.
someone recommend me a good sync utility that's cheap (willing to pay $40 or less, i guess, for shareware but not $100) so that i can get my files in order.
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 07:34 (eighteen years ago)
i just want to be able to open an application that just picks the newest revision of files off the drive and my hd and updates/overwrites the older ones.
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 07:51 (eighteen years ago)
i've got a directory on my computer that's got everything that's on the travel drive on it ... looks just like the thing.
so before i go to bed at night, do an rsyncx with my directory as source and my traveldrive as destination and "folder contents only".
when i get home from work (after playing w/ travel drive contents at work) do a rsyncx with the traveldrive as source and HD as destination.
should i do "update" or "two-way"??
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 07:57 (eighteen years ago)
In the situation outlined, it surely shouldn't matter which you do, because only the files in one place should have changed, so there won't be any changes to sync in the opposite direction.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 4 February 2007 08:06 (eighteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 4 February 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 4 February 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Tuesdays With Morimoto (Rock Hardy), Sunday, 4 February 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Elsa Svitborg (tracerhand), Sunday, 4 February 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Sunday, 4 February 2007 19:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 4 February 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
and to run both scripts at the same time and not do anything in between.
and to do this on an extremely regular basis.
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
first, do a two-way sync to get everything on the memory stickas new as possible.
next, just wipe everything off my harddisk.
then, use rsyncx on a daily basis just to back up my memory stick, and only work with files on the memory stick.
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
here is the basic situation:
1) i've got about a gigabyte of stuff i take back and forth with me between school and home. lessons, diagrams, worksheets, gradebooks, spreadsheets and so on.
2) i only edit a few items daily, but i need to make sure that everything is up-to-date on both laptop and memory stick as often as possible, especially the gradebook and spreadsheets.
3) when i am at work i work completely off the memory stick because i am hopping between 4 different offices.
4) when i am at home i plug the memory stick in the powerbook, but i don't want to leave it there for very long because it's really awkward to have a memory stick poking out of the side of the powerbook and i mostly work with the powerbook on my lap or in bed or on a crowded kitchen table.
so ... what should i do? mind you, i'm a complete n00b when it comes to rsync and unix-y stuff.
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 4 February 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
zzzz baiting zealots
― UART variations (ex machina), Monday, 5 February 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 5 February 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
― stet (stet), Monday, 5 February 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
- the tiresome old argument brooker propounds
- the fact someone as incisive as brooker should bother his arse to propound such an argument, even at the behest of a commissioning editor waving a bag of loot
- the shrieking shrew suggesting "writers" should be consulted about every edit to their copy
- the fact i've wasted two minutes of my life reading it
- the fact i obviously care.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 February 2007 23:08 (eighteen years ago)
― TOMBOT, Thursday, 3 May 2007 14:21 (eighteen years ago)