A thread for boring computer questions.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2397 of them)

get a mac

DG, Friday, 20 June 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

get a mac for free

libcrypt, Friday, 20 June 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Why is Solaris such shit? Is the reason being a Solaris admin pays so much is that you have to custom edit your .bash_profile to sett yr $PATH to:

/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/usr/bin

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 20 June 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, indeed the "shittiness" of an operating system is judged solely on the placement of its executables, nothing else.

libcrypt, Friday, 20 June 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, news flash: If setting yr path is giving you severe probs, Solaris has a few spankings in store for you.

libcrypt, Friday, 20 June 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey fuck you buddy, I know what I'm doing. There's just so much that isn't setup sanely out of the box.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 20 June 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

The default apache layout is shamefully bad.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 20 June 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah woop wooop linux and mac and all that but what's a good virus-hunter-killer for windows that's also open-source and good like what firefox is?

s.rose, Friday, 20 June 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Ubuntu

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 20 June 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

no not you

s.rose, Friday, 20 June 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

ok fixed, if anyone has the same problem just go here for a solution: http://www.spywareinfoforum.com/index.php?showtopic=114890

s.rose, makin ilx less of a haven of prickery '08

s.rose, Friday, 20 June 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I have Windows XP and use Mozilla Firefox (3.0). My computer consistently runs painfully slow despite me updating and running Ad-Aware every day to get rid of spyware, and despite me updating and running a scan with AVG every day to deal with viruses (which it never finds). I am nowhere near maxing out the GB on my computer. Sometimes in frustration I bring up the Task Manager to find out what the fuck is eating up the CPU and sometimes I find that programs I just closed are still running there.

Any ideas?

Bimble, Friday, 20 June 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, I have Windows Defender, but I don't remember if I tried to turn that off or not because it kept annoying me that it never tells me what it's doing.

Bimble, Friday, 20 June 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe you should defrag your HD. Speaking of, what are the better/faster defragmentation tools?

Leee, Saturday, 21 June 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh hi boring computer guys. I have a stupid stupid stupid problem.

Whenever I try to use alt-tab, it seems like every 1-2 seconds (I've tested this and it's pretty consistent) it cancels out as if something's trying to grab focus. I've tried closing pretty much every process I can think of and of course I've rebooted a few million times and removed a bunch of shit from my startup, but still, something must be grabbing focus (although nothing actually, you know, pops up).

WHAT THE FUCK GUYS

Will M., Thursday, 3 July 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I have Windows XP and use Mozilla Firefox (3.0). My computer consistently runs painfully slow

maybe you have a slow computer? what kind of chip is in it? which flavor of XP do you have (home or professional)? does it have 700 windows patch updates on it? you might also need more RAM. the side of your hard drive shouldn't have very much to do with your speed unless you are very short on RAM and it's using your hard drive for virtual memory and you're out of space there.

akm, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

also, firefox for windows, pre-3.0 at least, ate up my cpu cycles on my xp box all the time. it had a memory leak or something.

akm, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i solved this all by buying a mac

akm, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

enough posts from me

akm, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I would so move to a mac except this is my work machine

Will M., Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

call your helpdesk.

Jarlrmai, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

our 'help desk' is a dude who sits down the row form me, and he has no idea

my company's way small, see

Will M., Thursday, 3 July 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Downloaded a windows (XP) update and now can't access firefox/thunderbird even though it appears that I'm connected. Did a system restore and it's back working fine. The update included malicious software removal tool, any opinions on this anyone?

Billy Dods, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 12:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, where's the question?

libcrypt, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

xp update might have changed/turned on XP built in firewall and restricted those programs from reaching the internet for some reason

akm, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Never thought of that, I use zonealarm firewall and checked that to see if it was blocking access but looked ok. Will try installing update later and see if windows firewall blocks access.

Billy Dods, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

zonealarm kinda sucks, yr better off just using the windows firewall

DG, Wednesday, 9 July 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

It's a conflict with zonealarm apparently http://forums.computeractive.co.uk/thread.jspa?threadID=138881&tstart=0

Billy Dods, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:03 (sixteen years ago) link

unzipping .BAD files, how do i?

stevie, Friday, 18 July 2008 13:06 (sixteen years ago) link

there are 3 different things that use .bad extension, which is yours?

look at the start of the file (easier in unix...) and see what the file is rather than trusting what the extension says. it may just be a zip file with a cheeky extension change.

koogs, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link


% jacko -i -m sooo.BAD

libcrypt, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

#whois .BAD

Jarlrmai, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

it may just be a zip file with a cheeky extension change.

i think this is most likely the case, thanks!

stevie, Monday, 21 July 2008 07:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Hai I'm at some governement employment commission place and I want to turn on the volume so I can listen to music (like muxtape or hypem or streaming mp3s) thru my new earbuds but I don't have access to the control panel or volume or anything. (Windows obv.) CAN I HACK THIS?

wanko ergo sum, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:01 (sixteen years ago) link

if it's not under start->programs->accessories->entertainment, then... i dunno.

exe file is at windows/system32/sndvol32.exe ?

ledge, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, it is.

But if they care about it that much, they'll have disabled it in your hardware profile. In which case I think you're stuck.

Forest Pines Mk2, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:09 (sixteen years ago) link

No I don't have access to Run and my only accessories option is System Tools --> IE (no add-ons)

I really know nothing about computers but I figure there must be a way.

xp

wanko ergo sum, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:09 (sixteen years ago) link

If you don't have "Run..." or My Computer, try typing "C:\Windows\System32" (without quotes) into the IE titlebar.

Forest Pines Mk2, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Disallowed!!

Well looks like I'm fuxored. But thanks.

wanko ergo sum, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:14 (sixteen years ago) link

ipod

koogs, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

word

Surmounter, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Can anyone think of a way of converting a FAT32 partition with Windows XP installed on it into an NTFS one, possibly by cloning it, formatting it as NTFS and then copying back the files?

Ed, Friday, 25 July 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

No worries, answered my question.

http://www.aumha.org/win5/a/ntfscvt.php

Ed, Friday, 25 July 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I have UTF-8 encoded metadata that I need to convert to non UTF-8. Does anyone know if there is an encoding that will handle UTF-8 gracefully, e.g., turn accents in UTF-8 into accents in the standard character set for Western languages? I tried ISO 8559-1 and I still get funny characters.

youn, Sunday, 27 July 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

UTF-8 is the encoding you seek.

libcrypt, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:30 (sixteen years ago) link

hmm... depending on yr data/tools/skillset... there are a few programmatic ways that might be a bit more effective to convert utf-8 to ascii.

sometimes, if there's only a few problem characters... running a search and replace in any decent text editor is a plausible choice.

it depends on the exact problem.
m.

msp, Monday, 28 July 2008 04:33 (sixteen years ago) link

msp, I think that's possibly the best example of begging the answer that I've ever seen.

Anyways, the problem is not the encoding. UTF-8, or more broadly, Unicode, is a universal encoding, in that every character of every language is (theoretically, at least) represented. No, the problem is yr display device, which appears not to support UTF-8. You can either choose a different display device or you can discover which encodings are supported by yr display device of choice. If you are using a terminal-type application, then the solution may be as simple as choosing a Unicode font that supports the "funny chars" you want to see drawn correctly.

libcrypt, Monday, 28 July 2008 06:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, if you were really using ISO-8559-1 instead of ISO-8859-1, I'd expect that you'd not see what you want to see.

libcrypt, Monday, 28 July 2008 06:21 (sixteen years ago) link

UTF-8, or more broadly, Unicode, is a universal encoding

Unicode is a character set. UTF-8 is an encoding. Unicode characters in UTF-8 are one to four bytes long. ISO-8859-1 (Latin 1) is a character set and encoding in which all characters are one byte long. Provided your data only contains characters that are available in Latin 1 there's no reason why it shouldn't be desirable or possible to convert UTF-8 encoded characters to Latin 1. Some solutions here: http://www.unicodetools.com/

ledge, Monday, 28 July 2008 08:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks, ledge. That was exactly what I needed - the tools to do the conversion. I had been trying to do it with an XML editor and I don't think it was working. Thanks!!! I will try it out today...

This is going into a database that does not support Unicode. :(

youn, Monday, 28 July 2008 11:50 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.