Words, usages, and phrases that annoy the shit out of you...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10613 of them)
only one mention of "proactive"? and by that roger adultery guy

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 18 August 2005 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

the one time i heard someone use the phrase "crunch some numbers" in total seriousness, it required every ounce of my strength to not annihilate him where he stood.

i will also echo the "rediculous" hatred and submit "definately" and all related butcherings of D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y, PEOPLE, for the love of...

joseph (joseph), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate it when people write 'tow the line' instead of 'toe the line'.

estela (estela), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:14 (nineteen years ago) link

"crunch some numbers" is kinda cute!

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Two things that totally drive me crazy:

1. Seeing "could of" or "should of" or "would of"
2. "The hell with..." - this can't be right. It must be "to hell with...", but I've seen the former version in print so many times I'm starting to wonder. But even if "the hell with..." is somehow correct, I still despise it with all my soul.

zayats, Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate it when people write 'tow the line' instead of 'toe the line'.

here here! (sic)

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Based on this thread, we are all guilty of follies and should be slain.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:47 (nineteen years ago) link

It's been said that the disinterested/uninterested distinction is one that was called to attention by Fowler as a pet cause, and it's unknown whether it would be seen as such a bugaboo without his lead.

Geoffrey Nunberg in The Atlantic:

Unbiased and impartial will not do the work that disinterested used to be reserved for. But there is no point making a fuss about this change, because it was forgone that disinterested would lose its older sense once interested lost the sense of "having a stake in," which we retain only in the fixed phrase interested party. Even if disinterested had survived intact, therefore, it would eventually have become one of those curious asymmetric negatives like untoward and disgrace, whose senses are not recoverable as the sum of their parts. Invoking the second criterion, we should be prepared to admit that the fight on behalf of disinterested is a "lost cause," as Trilling described it. This may be an occasion for regret, but indignation would be out of place. Isaac Asimov writes, "I'm very proud of knowing the distinction, and insist on it, correcting others freely." The fact that being familiar with a distinction can be a cause for self-congratulation is, however, reason to eliminate it from the canons of standard usage, which should not be repositories of grammatical arcane.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate people who write "draw" instead of "drawer" (the things you store your cutlery in etc). DRAWER, people. IT ISNT A PEN.

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:52 (nineteen years ago) link

panties

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:53 (nineteen years ago) link

when someone in the uk says 'do the math', my blood starts to boil.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I could have sworn I posted about my hatred of standard canned office speak such as "can of worms" and "head's up" on here already but I guess that was somewhere else. Also vile: "compelling". FUCK THAT don't tell me that something is "compelling", make it interesting to begin with.

Also, "That being said," and all variations of it. IF YOU WEREN'T RIGHT OR DIDN'T MEAN THE FIRST BIT WHY DID YOU EVEN SAY IT YOU ASSHOLE?

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:55 (nineteen years ago) link

"one [Person's Name]" -- as in "Walking out of the coffee shop on Tuesday morning was one Spencer Chow." (Usually used to suggest some sort of eyebrow-raising "who should it be but.")

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Kyle, surely you understand the concept of ambivalence?!?

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 18 August 2005 23:58 (nineteen years ago) link

"can of worms" is office speak?

I should get a job

RJG (RJG), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:01 (nineteen years ago) link

'No pun intended' annoys me. Usually it's said to someone who didn't intend to pun and can't be bothered with whatever pun is being inferred by the punster.

estela (estela), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Nabisco and Walter: Hey "Dudes", thanks! I went and read again about the ebonics "thing". I see your point. But if you cannot communicate and people cannot communicate with you how can you possibly learn math or anything for that matter?

Wiggy (Wiggy), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Lots of the offending examples in this thread (excepting the marketing-speak) could be perceived as creative/colloquial/regional/whatever language and, while we all have our peeves, may not be incorrect per se.

Language witched up by human resource departments (ew) however, deserves its own special place in the fiery hereafter. I recently got an email at work that proudly held forth on our NEW AND IMPROVED orientation program for new employees...except, instead of boring old "orientation", they're launching the new term "on-boarding". As in, getting someone ON BOARD. If you sat within 20 feet of me you'd have heard teeth grinding, I tells ya.

Laurel, Friday, 19 August 2005 00:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Recently, I've been exchanging e-mails with a girl I met online and every message from her contains AT LEAST one "anywho".

kickitcricket (kickitcricket), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:26 (nineteen years ago) link

"Appies" for appetizers is an expression I loathe and is now so common it's showing up on menus.

everything, Friday, 19 August 2005 00:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Argh I admit I say "that said..." a lot :/

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Usually because yeah I'm ambivalent, or at least trying to indicate I'm open to different POV on an argument. eg "well I think X, but that said, Y seems plausible too, so yeah". Etc.

Trayce (trayce), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link

people throughout my entire company overuse "due to" and do so incorrectly ALL the time. it makes me want to scream!!!

tehRZA gibbons (tehresa), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, "That being said," and all variations of it. IF YOU WEREN'T RIGHT OR DIDN'T MEAN THE FIRST BIT WHY DID YOU EVEN SAY IT YOU ASSHOLE?

i take "that being said" to be an introduction to a follow-up statement, or a proviso. i appreciate the inverted-pyramid-style organization of thought here: lay down the most relevant information first, then start to put your own spin on things.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 01:54 (nineteen years ago) link

"Appies" for appetizers is an expression I loathe and is now so common it's showing up on menus.

i'm sort of curious about the very english thing of diminutizing (infantilizing?) common nouns. "butty" and "sarnie" and "appie" and "footie" (although "footie" usually refers to aussie rules football, right?) and (to name a few where the diminutizations don't come with any shift in literal meaning) watching "telly," paying the "lecky" bill, getting a new "brolly" as a "pressie," etc.

i know i'm posting this on an "annoys the shit out of you" thread, but i have no problem with any of it!

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:07 (nineteen years ago) link

i think all languages might do this though!

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I hate when people say "just deserts" and I know if they had to write it down they'd spell it "desserts." Stupid fuckin' twats. People. I hate 'em. Also, it's not "Custard's" Last Stand. I mean, I'm almost positive some thinks it's "Custard," but it isn't. Okay? It isn't.

off 'is meds, Friday, 19 August 2005 02:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't know what you mean, s/c

RJG (RJG), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:17 (nineteen years ago) link

otm caitlin

tehRZA gibbons (tehresa), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link

It's late for this, but I really hated the whole "death of irony"/"end of irony" meme. You might say I hated it from ground zero.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:25 (nineteen years ago) link

i like this meme, but only in that irony is so tiring. maybe it's less annoying if you aren't surrounded by ironic morons in college.

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link

"purposely" and "purposefully" are NOT THE SAME WORD, ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE, AND DO NOT MEAN THE SAME THING. STOP DOING IT. THANK YOU.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link

"good for the soul" NO IT ISN'T

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link

why, it's our old friend "nuke-ular"!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually heard some neocon "expert" on C-SPAN pronouncing it new cue lure with clear, evident intent, presumably for wingnut cred. The white fascist equivalent of "axe," I guess...

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:43 (nineteen years ago) link

The laid-back place where I work has unfortunately been recently infitrated by a User of Annoying Speech. Recently BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH . . . so just a "HEADS' UP." And later, to another coworker Can you do BLAH BLAH BLAH . . . "ASAP"?

Mary (Mary), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:51 (nineteen years ago) link

i like this meme, but only in that irony is so tiring. maybe it's less annoying if you aren't surrounded by ironic morons in college.

-- caitlin oh no (caitx...), August 19th, 2005.

Well, actually, there's some truth to that. But it wasn't college kids repeating this meme, it was journalists. It was like "NOW THAT SOMETHING BAD HAS HAPPENED, CAN WE EVER NOT TAKE EVERYTHING TO BE SOMBER AND SERIOUS AGAIN???" Of course we can you sanctimonious fucks!

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:54 (nineteen years ago) link

To use another meme I loathe, LONDON SURVIVED THE BLITZ and they still have irony.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Doesn't the more nuanced version of this meme claim that there now exists a "post-ironic" state of mind that is somehow simultaneously sincere and ironic? The future as Andy Kaufman.


By the way...re words what annoy...the shit...out of...

------->"meme"

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:01 (nineteen years ago) link

I knew someone was going to bring up "meme". But I find it to be a very useful, if starting-to-be-overused term.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:04 (nineteen years ago) link

"purposely" and "purposefully" are NOT THE SAME WORD, ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE, AND DO NOT MEAN THE SAME THING. STOP DOING IT. THANK YOU.

matos, once again i say YOU'RE A DOLL.

(i like "meme" too.)

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:06 (nineteen years ago) link

i'm happy we're all over doing in-depth investigations of "schadenfreude" now ("wow, did you know there's, like, a TERM for that thing when you're happy about someone's failure? yeah, it's true, a big fancy GERMAN word.")

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:08 (nineteen years ago) link

What word did people use before the rather recent Coinage of Meme?

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:09 (nineteen years ago) link

"thing"

gem (trisk), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:10 (nineteen years ago) link

i think all languages might do this though!

i don't think american english does it so relentlessly though.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:10 (nineteen years ago) link

That's just it, I think I like "meme" because it feels like the first adequate word to describe what it describes. But maybe I'm forgetting something.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:12 (nineteen years ago) link

another one: "presently" doesn't mean "currently."

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:15 (nineteen years ago) link

x-meme

This is what I'm wondering. Trend? Fad? Archetype? Cultural development? Idea?

I do concede that maybe, just maybe, this is a case of a new word engendering new thoughts. A meme meme. If you will. As it were.

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:18 (nineteen years ago) link

the verb "trending"

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:20 (nineteen years ago) link

outside of juicy statistical research projects, that is.

s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:27 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.