― everything, Friday, 19 August 2005 00:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Trayce (trayce), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― tehRZA gibbons (tehresa), Friday, 19 August 2005 00:47 (nineteen years ago) link
i take "that being said" to be an introduction to a follow-up statement, or a proviso. i appreciate the inverted-pyramid-style organization of thought here: lay down the most relevant information first, then start to put your own spin on things.
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 01:54 (nineteen years ago) link
i'm sort of curious about the very english thing of diminutizing (infantilizing?) common nouns. "butty" and "sarnie" and "appie" and "footie" (although "footie" usually refers to aussie rules football, right?) and (to name a few where the diminutizations don't come with any shift in literal meaning) watching "telly," paying the "lecky" bill, getting a new "brolly" as a "pressie," etc.
i know i'm posting this on an "annoys the shit out of you" thread, but i have no problem with any of it!
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:07 (nineteen years ago) link
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― off 'is meds, Friday, 19 August 2005 02:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― tehRZA gibbons (tehresa), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago) link
― M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Mary (Mary), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:51 (nineteen years ago) link
-- caitlin oh no (caitx...), August 19th, 2005.
Well, actually, there's some truth to that. But it wasn't college kids repeating this meme, it was journalists. It was like "NOW THAT SOMETHING BAD HAS HAPPENED, CAN WE EVER NOT TAKE EVERYTHING TO BE SOMBER AND SERIOUS AGAIN???" Of course we can you sanctimonious fucks!
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 02:55 (nineteen years ago) link
By the way...re words what annoy...the shit...out of...
------->"meme"
― M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:04 (nineteen years ago) link
matos, once again i say YOU'RE A DOLL.
(i like "meme" too.)
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― gem (trisk), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:10 (nineteen years ago) link
i don't think american english does it so relentlessly though.
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:15 (nineteen years ago) link
This is what I'm wondering. Trend? Fad? Archetype? Cultural development? Idea?
I do concede that maybe, just maybe, this is a case of a new word engendering new thoughts. A meme meme. If you will. As it were.
― M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:27 (nineteen years ago) link
and any variations of same.
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:40 (nineteen years ago) link
"Values Voter" (as if people vote on anything else)
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:40 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:43 (nineteen years ago) link
why? why not American Security, U.S. Security, of just plain Security.
What are the cultural ramifications of this antiquated, underused, in the contxt of this country, phrase being given new life.
Homelands are where people come from, they are not the new, shiny America. But homelands are often under siege, is this why it must be Homeland Security, so we will realize the great importance of the endeavor. If it way US Security, would we not feel so comforted, protected.
― Mary (Mary), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:44 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:48 (nineteen years ago) link
That's exactly what the Homeland Security dept. is.
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 03:49 (nineteen years ago) link
in other news...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/images/300-HSAS-Chart.jpg
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:10 (nineteen years ago) link
That's why Ebonics proponents wanted the state to provide more funding to teach these students English just like it funds ESL programs for kids who speak only Spanish.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:12 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― gem (trisk), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― moley (moley), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― gem (trisk), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:30 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:32 (nineteen years ago) link
― jimmy glass (electricsound), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― moley (moley), Friday, 19 August 2005 04:42 (nineteen years ago) link