I also have a horror of people who write prolifically in all caps.
― felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
This is true.
But, this is a topic that should be dealt with routinely and harshly... the only way we can correct the language and suppress it's organic growth is by exposing and banning every new usage as it occurs... Isn't that what the French do?
― andy, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)
Also: 'fridge,' girls who refer to each other as 'girl,' proactive...i'll be back when i think of more....
― roger adultery, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 01:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Roderick the Visigoth. (Jake Proudlock), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 03:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 24 December 2003 03:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― BrianB (BrianB), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 05:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Melly E (Melly E), Wednesday, 24 December 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― barbara wintergreen, Monday, 29 December 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Salmon Pink (Salmon Pink), Monday, 29 December 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 29 December 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)
'poetic justice'. Used by the lazy to describe all 'justice' the speaker approves of, instead of a particular type. The adjective is rendered meaningless.
Agree re 'bird' for woman/girl, and lament its threatened return. Stinks of 'I'm being un-PC, where's my medal?'. Also the C-person uses it, which kinda ends the argument.
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 29 December 2003 23:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― barbara wintergreen, Tuesday, 30 December 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― ermes marana, Tuesday, 30 December 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Thursday, 18 August 2005 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― s/c (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 18 August 2005 07:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 18 August 2005 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Wait, huh? Fridge is the thing you put food in, whats wrong with it?
― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 18 August 2005 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 09:10 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm picturing him saying things such as "Would you like me to remove another beverage from the refrigerator for you, whilst we watch some association football?"
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― naus (Robert T), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Win A Lie-Down, Mrs. Davies (kate), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― jimmy glass (electricsound), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― naus (Robert T), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)
As used to describe a footballer running into a streak of good form
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― stelf)xxx, Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)
When used in phrases like "a raft of policies" or "a raft of new measures" - why?!?!??!!?
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Or a colon.
COINKY-DINK, "guestimate," and any time someone ends an interrogative sentence with "at," as in "Where's my keys at?" or "Where's your head at?"
― pullapartgirl (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)
"hating on"
― gem (trisk), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
"Action" used as a verb. (Especially with regards to some annoying little thing I had already been doing.) "Can you please action this?" Actually, no I can't. Action is a noun. If you would like me to DO it, then just ask. Argh.
Especially when coming from the same irritating marketing bods who last week asked me to "manage the relationship" with one of our suppliers. Fuck. Right. Off.
― Win A Lie-Down, Mrs. Davies (kate), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― gem (trisk), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)
A term of address directed at Turkish shopkeepers by 13 year old boys and directed by Turkish shopkeepers at everyone else. The most annoying ever.
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)
DON'T MADAM ME, YOU LITTLE...!!! OK, according to Watching The English, this means that they have socio-status assessed me as middle class or higher. But it irritates me because it makes me feel old.
― Win A Lie-Down, Mrs. Davies (kate), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Diddyismus (Dada), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)
'Whilst'
― estela (estela), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― g-kit (g-kit), Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 18 August 2005 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)
in Appalachia you might say "I done did it"
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 15 September 2026 22:22 (yesterday)
needs changed to my mind indubitably more correct than needs changing
i dont want you back to me amidst the change
someone's hair "wants" cutting is fairly easily recognised as "in want of" imo
a lot of objections raised here are all but hate speech against regional language ofc and all offerings have to be weighed up very carefully
submissions need weighed, posts want thinking about
the "do" offered in first example idk idk
― Wichita Referee's Assistant (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 September 2026 22:34 (yesterday)
suzy’s “could do” is a CLASSIC example of what seems brit-foreign to my ear. “could… do? do what? the prev referent? or— what?!”
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 15 September 2026 22:41 (yesterday)
"will do" is terrible, i hate it
― brimstead, Tuesday, 15 September 2026 22:42 (yesterday)
with little offshoot orphans like that i usually translate it to french or irish to see if i can spot where it might have come from
beats getting mad about it
― Wichita Referee's Assistant (darraghmac), Tuesday, 15 September 2026 22:55 (yesterday)
I will say the following:Needs fixedWas fixing to
― sarahell, Tuesday, 15 September 2026 23:08 (yesterday)
suzy’s “could do” is a CLASSIC example of what seems brit-foreign
But "Can do!" probably sounds mellifluous, right? that old yankee, roll-up-your-sleeves spirit
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 15 September 2026 23:35 (yesterday)
can do! will do! are known slangy forms. very stand alone.
the do’s i’m thinking of are more like, lashed into full communication strings or whatever.
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 15 September 2026 23:56 (yesterday)
re: fixing to— good fun one.
even as a yankee my favorite perceived southernism is “might could.” i’ll use it for its odd disjunction to my usual style.
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 15 September 2026 23:59 (yesterday)
where americans would allow a hanging “to,” you always insert a “do,” which is both not the expected infinitive verb and sounds weird as hell. there’s also a gerund format of this behavio(u)r and i can’t spontaneously do one for you, i’m fucking vacuuming.
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, September 15, 2026 10:31 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
i've noticed british people doing this with the present perfect tense, as in the following example:
A: You haven't done any work today at all!B: Yes I have done!
Whereas Americans would normall clip this to "Yes I have!"
― budo (Cattedrale metropolitana di Santa Maria de Episcopio), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:06 (eighteen hours ago)
this doesn't annoy me ftr
― budo (Cattedrale metropolitana di Santa Maria de Episcopio), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:07 (eighteen hours ago)
again, exactly. i’m poor at explaining my issue.
*brit pose* and i say, it’s a minor one really.
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:13 (eighteen hours ago)
which is both not the expected infinitive verb
right, this is where it gets weird. like responding to "Have you walked the dog today?" with "I have done"
― budo (Cattedrale metropolitana di Santa Maria de Episcopio), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:21 (eighteen hours ago)
or maybe they only say it to affirm a negatively worded question? -- "You haven't walked the dog yet?" -- "I have done"
Brits please weigh in
― budo (Cattedrale metropolitana di Santa Maria de Episcopio), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:23 (seventeen hours ago)
"Do you want to meet up on Thursday?" "Yeah, I could do."
Like that?
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 00:37 (seventeen hours ago)
My local “fixing to” variant is “about to.” Did you sweep the floor?
I was about to.
― Cow_Art, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 01:27 (sixteen hours ago)
I'm wondering who these British people are tbh.
― Happiness is a warm gurn (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 06:35 (eleven hours ago)
The correct response of course is "piss off"
― one for the dylanologists (Matt #2), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 06:58 (eleven hours ago)
I think if you drop the "yes" it sounds much more plausible. "I have done". Having the yes as well is one defiance too many.
― Alba, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 07:00 (eleven hours ago)
needs must
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 07:22 (eleven hours ago)
Regional variants, most British people wouldn't say it.
― Happiness is a warm gurn (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 07:23 (ten hours ago)
I'm unable to say "where is it" without instinctively wanting to add "to?" but that's a SW thing
― kinder, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 08:15 (ten hours ago)
Let me see, I'll ask AI...
Mrs Gillespie: "Bob, you haven't walked the dog yet?"
Boaby: "Aye ah huv but ah'm no' fuckin' happy aboot it! It wis your idea tae get a fuckin' dug so how come ah'm the wan who hus tae walk the wee cunt? It's no' exactly good fur ma image is it? Fuckin' world renowned rock 'n' roll star mincin' aboot wi' a fuckin' Poodle at the end o' a fuckin' leash..."
Mrs Gillespie: "He's a Bichon Frisé."
Boaby: "Well, whatever the fuck it is, whit if wan o' ma fans sees us? I'd be black affrontit! In fact, ah wis oot walkin' the wee pest yisterday when who should ah see marchin' up the road taewards us but fuckin' Alan McGee, hud tae fuckin' dive intae a shoap doorway so he didnae clock us. Can ye imagine whit that wee rat McGee woulda said if he'd seen me? He'd've totally ripped the fuckin' pish oot me, that's whit! Ah'd never live it fuckin' doon, man! Here... haud oan... that's ma fuckin' phone... hullo?"
McGee: *muffled voice*
Boaby: "Awright McGee, whit dae you wahnt, ya wee rat?"
Boaby: "Ye whit? Saw me the other day? Don't 'hink so, mate..."
Boaby: "Me wi' a dug? Ye're haverin', wee man..."
Boaby: "Whit, two in the efternin? Nah, ah wis eh... hingin' oot wi' Liam at the time, we'd errrr jist rolled oot o' bed ..."
Boaby: "Naw, no' thegither, ya cheeky article..."
Boaby: "Definitely wisnae me, wee man..."
Boaby: "Right... awright... aye ah know, 3-0, too easy fur the fuckin' Teddy Berrs but, here, remember ah'm supposed tae be a Celtic fan..."
Boaby: "Right, see ye aroon, wee yin."
Puts the phone down.
Boaby: "Whit did ah fuckin' tell ye? Talk aboot a narra fuckin' escape! Ye listenin' tae me therr?"
Mrs Gillespie: "Sorry, I was distracted, Alan just posted a simply adorable photo on the Primal Scream Facebook page..."
Boaby: "Whit? Let me see that... FUUUCCCKKKKKK!!!!"
So the answer appears to be no.
― Happiness is a warm gurn (Tom D.), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 08:54 (nine hours ago)
You asked Och I for that.
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 11:33 (six hours ago)
peace to peace man pro grammarians have precedence, i defer― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, September 15, 2026 2:54 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Tuesday, September 15, 2026 2:54 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
I'm just foolin' around. People can say things how they want. But "needs warshed" is definitely a flag to me that someone is new in town and they're from Pittsburgh.
― peace, man, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 12:29 (five hours ago)
Or Ohio
― Piggy Lepton (La Lechera), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 15:22 (three hours ago)
St Louis, too
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 15:31 (two hours ago)
the phrase-final use of do used in (some) British dialects is a pro-verb that refers to an already-introduced verb:
Have you unpacked your things yet? -> I have done (ref. unpacked)
It's not a use-it or not-use-it distinction though, as variants of it are found in different contexts in most English dialects:
Have you tried these petit fours? -> No. -> Please do!
or
You should order the petit fours for dessert! -> That's what I was gonna do!
Go to bed early since we have to wake up at 6am tomorrow. -> I will do so.
and of course
I'm going to jump off this bridge! -> Don't!
― fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 16:01 (two hours ago)
i am so satisfied and informed re my comment by all. thanky.
― viking voyages were all inclusive: leg irons, murdered children (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 16 September 2026 16:14 (two hours ago)
They do, though, don't they, though?
― kinder, Wednesday, 16 September 2026 16:45 (one hour ago)