Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6943 of them)

VETO

no geirs with attitude (blueski), Monday, 28 March 2011 11:42 (thirteen years ago) link

(Spoiler alert/warning)Oh snap.

http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2009/12/SHIT-JUST-GOT-REAL-GIF.gif

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Monday, 28 March 2011 18:12 (thirteen years ago) link

He's denied it already btw.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Monday, 28 March 2011 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

it's actually "The Doctor's Sister-Wife"

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Monday, 28 March 2011 18:42 (thirteen years ago) link

It's "The Doctor's Wilf", about the fan theory regarding Bernard Cribbins' character, whose name was an anagram of TIMELORD WTF.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Monday, 28 March 2011 18:48 (thirteen years ago) link

Also, this title has form. JNT used it more than once to try and pin leaks down to a specific individual.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Monday, 28 March 2011 18:56 (thirteen years ago) link

please let's not spoiler here

kris menace isn't even french (sic), Monday, 28 March 2011 22:51 (thirteen years ago) link

First story set in 1969, so Nixon

Would like to see Ice Warriors again, since a baddies race that actually aren't baddies is more interesting, and they kind of muffed the Silurians comeback by giving it to a dud writer

the most cuddlesome bug that ever was borned (James Morrison), Monday, 28 March 2011 23:12 (thirteen years ago) link

though it was really obvious it was Nixon from the clip tbh!

no geirs with attitude (blueski), Monday, 28 March 2011 23:47 (thirteen years ago) link

Any Ice Warriors story on a TV budget is going to fall short against The Dying Days.

challop: ron peno (sic), Monday, 28 March 2011 23:49 (thirteen years ago) link

If they do the Ice Warriors, they should totally try to get Emma Thompson to show up as an older version of Benny

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Monday, 28 March 2011 23:50 (thirteen years ago) link

so when are they bringing bonnie langford back then

Romford Spring (DG), Monday, 28 March 2011 23:56 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vIsQ25Krq8

most interesting wtf glimpse occurs at 37 seconds

no geirs with attitude (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:19 (thirteen years ago) link

also what might be a MINOTAUR

no geirs with attitude (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link

the return of NIMON

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:23 (thirteen years ago) link

The season trailers never fail to get me super stoked.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:09 (thirteen years ago) link

I am super stoked to see ǝןoɔ ʎןıן and Karen Gillan lez up

Neo Tony (sic), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:08 (thirteen years ago) link

lily cole has a face like a sullen pudding, so not so much interested in that, thanks

the most cuddlesome bug that ever was borned (James Morrison), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:23 (thirteen years ago) link

but also super stoked by trailer in general

the most cuddlesome bug that ever was borned (James Morrison), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:23 (thirteen years ago) link

I didn't see the lezzing up in the trailer. I too am super stoked by that (as much as non-porn lezzing up can ever be super-stoking) but yeh, the whole trailer looks fun. Sad clown sitting on the bed was a bit Shining, I'[ve got high hopes for this series.

Yossarian's sense of humour (NotEnough), Thursday, 31 March 2011 07:44 (thirteen years ago) link

most interesting wtf glimpse occurs at 37 seconds

The bloke from Outcasts? BBC SF mashup!

and the hint of parp (ledge), Thursday, 31 March 2011 08:40 (thirteen years ago) link

Also, was that a glimpse of the clown from the painting in the hall in the Corden episode?

Stevie T, Thursday, 31 March 2011 08:55 (thirteen years ago) link

A bit too stoked for this as well...

anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 31 March 2011 08:57 (thirteen years ago) link

Wasn't the clown the Doctor?

You're fucking fired and you know jack shit about horses (James Morrison), Thursday, 31 March 2011 21:51 (thirteen years ago) link

Kids + "look behind you" sounds a bit tired-Moffat to me, but I will try to keep the faith.

Alba, Friday, 1 April 2011 23:37 (thirteen years ago) link

i'll probably never get tired of that but am trying to keep the faith re Doctor saving himself paradoxes

black bloc bologna (blueski), Friday, 1 April 2011 23:48 (thirteen years ago) link

Possible spoilery talk follows, please ignore if required ...

The back-of-the-DVD text for the first 7 eps mentions a bubble universe containing an old friend with a new face -- are we talking a certain person once played by Mrs Richard Dawkins here?

You're fucking fired and you know jack shit about horses (James Morrison), Monday, 4 April 2011 00:09 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12969897

"Children absolutely rank Doctor Who stories in order of frightening-ness - that's what it's about.

"You put the jokes in and the silly bits in for the adults and you put the scares in for the kids."

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 April 2011 13:07 (thirteen years ago) link

2-month break in the middle of the series sucks. I suppose it means they don't have to worry about running it in the school holidays/height of summer.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link

I am annoyed by this too -- a lot of the US cable series do this, and it is never not irritating.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Tuesday, 5 April 2011 16:38 (thirteen years ago) link

There's no (well, very little) continuity across episodes, though, so I see it as a way of just drawing out the pleasure. It would suck if it were all over in three months.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 April 2011 16:44 (thirteen years ago) link

^^^ exciting

they call him (remy bean), Wednesday, 6 April 2011 13:36 (thirteen years ago) link

Not reading that. For the first time since 2005 I'm going into this series without knowing anything about any of the episodes.

Hippocratic Oaf (DavidM), Wednesday, 6 April 2011 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link

i think the 2 month break is an awesome plan. esp as it means who in autumn WHEN IT IS MEANT TO BE ON

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 6 April 2011 20:23 (thirteen years ago) link

Episode titles aren't spoilers, right?

1. The Impossible Astronaut (pt1, Steven Moffat)
2. Day of the Moon (pt2, Steven Moffat)
3. The Curse of the Black Spot (Steve Thompson)
4. The Doctor's Wife (Neil Gaiman)
5. The Rebel Flesh (pt1, Matthew Graham)
6. The Almost People (pt2, Matthew Graham)
7. A Good Man Goes To War (Steven Moffat)

JimD, Thursday, 7 April 2011 17:46 (thirteen years ago) link

No, they only are when I mention them. In fact, Dan and I got a NO SPOILERS for referring even obliquely to the title of the Gaiman ep. It's enough to make you think there's a conspiracy.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Thursday, 7 April 2011 17:55 (thirteen years ago) link

In fact, on 28th March.

The prequel to the first ep (which it's not clear if you need to watch) is on the website btw.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Thursday, 7 April 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link

No, they only are when I mention them. In fact, Dan and I got a NO SPOILERS for referring even obliquely to the title of the Gaiman ep. It's enough to make you think there's a conspiracy.

― I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Friday, 8 April 2011 03:55

lol, because I was asleep at A QUARTER TO FOUR IN THE MORNING and not leaping onto the internet in case you took longer than nine minutes to reply? I accidentally read the last one of those titles while scrolling past, and I am indeed mildly annoyed about knowing it.

[and thus being able to draw inferences about characters and plots that might be in an episode TWO MONTHS AWAY, and which will have been built up to by SIX PREVIOUS EPISODES about which I know nothing. except that one's in puɐןɐɔıɹǝɯɐ]

a bunch of us ITT have said that we rly like avoiding reading anything about upcoming Who, and thus bringing a sense of fresh, childlike wonder to our viewing, because a) we are all sappy nostalgists about watching the show as kids and b) it is designed to reward that attitude so why not meet it halfway. it's about a way some people enjoy the show, that happens to not be the way others like and choose to enjoy the show - it's nothing personal about you!

you big nerdy mentalist you.

Ita Buttrock (sic), Friday, 8 April 2011 04:36 (thirteen years ago) link

I've got your back here, I'm pretty much sticking to the "only what's just been on the screen" rule ITT - I only mentioned the prequel because it's not clear whether it's necessary or not. Jim, who posted it, was firmly in the camp you describe in your last paragraph for previous seasons.

I wasn't annoyed when I wrote what you quoted, there probably should have been a winky or something after it.

I said Omorotic, not homo-erotic (aldo), Friday, 8 April 2011 06:34 (thirteen years ago) link

Er yeah I'm 100% hardcore butthurt spoilerphobe but c'mon, episode titles? Those things appear ON SCREEN in BIG LETTERS at the start of the episodes. And even then, I added a line to say "hey, these are episode titles" so that people could still choose to skip over them if they wanted to. "I tried to skip it and read it by accident bah" is...I dunno, nuts.

Apart from anything else, it's been common practice in previous Who threads to make the episode list the top post for a new season's thread.

JimD, Friday, 8 April 2011 08:23 (thirteen years ago) link

blueski actually embedded the trailer. i can't believe he's not banned tbqh.

bantonio banderas (history mayne), Friday, 8 April 2011 08:24 (thirteen years ago) link

If you don't want to know anything at all about the upcoming series you probably shouldn't be reading the thread about the upcoming series. Nothing wrong with posting titles at all.

Matt DC, Friday, 8 April 2011 08:53 (thirteen years ago) link

Those things appear ON SCREEN in BIG LETTERS at the start of the episodes.

Yes, five minutes INTO the episode you are already watching, not two months before

And even then, I added a line to say "hey, these are episode titles" so that people could still choose to skip over them if they wanted to.

I know, appreciated - hence trying to scroll past!

"I tried to skip it and read it by accident bah" is...I dunno, nuts.

my (deliberately here) extreme position is also exacerbated by being unable to get useful information out of the b33b at work, like launch dates and TX durations and.... ep titles, so seeing them bandied about for pre-screening discussion in the ~outside world~ rankles especially

(but, y'know, "mildly")

Apart from anything else, it's been common practice in previous Who threads to make the episode list the top post for a new season's thread.

and fuck that imo

but sorry to everyone who doesn't want to read this thread-clogging nonsense!

Ita Buttrock (sic), Friday, 8 April 2011 10:37 (thirteen years ago) link

Just trying to imagine a season preview thread that contained absolutely zero preview information though.

"ooh, Doctor Who's coming back soon"
"hooray!"
"i love doctor who"
"i wonder what will happen in the new episodes"
"i have no idea!"
"me neither!"
"matt smith is great"
"is he still going to be in it?"
"who knows!?"
etc

JimD, Friday, 8 April 2011 10:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Ha, yeah, I know I'm pro-speculation there, but speculation still needs to be based on something. And episode titles are the right kind of something, really.

JimD, Friday, 8 April 2011 11:06 (thirteen years ago) link

Just trying to imagine a season preview thread

if you scroll up I think you'll find 97% of this thread is actually talking about the episodes after they've TXed

Ita Buttrock (sic), Friday, 8 April 2011 11:28 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.