Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

^ uses flashblock

i'm inclined to say just don't look at the thread it if you're gonna be so precious about what amounts to no spoilers? but this thread has always played by its own weird rules about spoilers, so i'm not gonna say it very loudly.

Could we post the trailer up and then talk about it? I haven't seen it so really have no idea what's going on up thread, so feel your frustration sic, but if a trailer is available surely we could have it on the thread and chat about it?

Trailer's up the thread a bit, hence why people were talking about it.

Duh, I'm a twunt.

Yeah, I reckon discussing trailers is fair game.

i'm inclined to say just don't look at the thread it if you're gonna be so precious about what amounts to no spoilers?

but I really like the theorising and discussion and nerding out about what's actually aired!

but this thread has always played by its own weird rules about spoilers, so i'm not gonna say it very loudly.

yeah that's the thing - it's not like I'm whinging on the Community thread about all the casting spoilers for imminent episodes.

I do take some strength from the dude in charge of the show these days having p much the same attitude as me though - that the episodes themselves are written to pace reveals and twists and shocks in a dramatic way, and that spoilers fuck up the storytelling for (most of) the audience and the author's intent

A trailer is not a spoiler. If it's been broadcast, it's fair game.

it's a spoiler if the creator didn't want it in the trailer! [not that I'm saying that's happened this time, just that Moffatt's been frustrated by it before. but 99.7% of pre-movie movie trailers are total, awful spoilers]

that argument last time turned into Suzy saying if it was in the Radio Times, or talked about in breakfast television on BBC Scotland, then it was "out there" and there was no way anyone could possibly not immediately report it on this thread. slippery slope innit.

anyway sorry for getting tedious, I was just quietly asking nicely ^^

AAAAAAAAAAAAARGH.

xpost Moffat has no problem with official trailers because I do believe those are approved of by the showrunner but he does have a problem with people who attend preview screenings and -then- post spoilers, particularly important plot spoilers. Which I totally understand, while most of whom who do attend the screenings are quick to just write something along the lines eg "a more darker season in tone, a surprise in episode 4, will blow your mind" etc, there are one or two who do let out key plot details and which I have seen floating around in many places. The trailers just show you glimpses but as far as i can see don't really tell you about what's actually going to happen.

this thread is the most spoiler neurotic tv thread i've read on ilx, which either says something about doctor who, or about the kinds of ppl who watch it

Ha ha, could it be because of river songs catchphrase feeding into reality?

lol probably the latter xpost

Just noticed: Doctor Who credits RT Davies when his ideas are used (ie Ood) in Moffat-era Who

Torchwood does not, and never has, credited Moffatt, despite him creating Torchwood's main character, Captain Jack

think moffat'd want to distance himself tbh

remember when there was something hiding in the darkness after death and it was a blue cgi minotaur

Did Moffatt create Captain Jack or just write the episode in which Rusty wanted him introduced?

Jack is surely just RTD's big wet dream and if Moffat thought he worked as a big broody lead character at all I'd be bitterly disappointed.

Did Moffatt create Captain Jack or just write the episode in which Rusty wanted him introduced?

Iirc RTD created the character, Moffatt just happened to write the first episodes in which he was to appear in.

Enjoying the AV Club's current series of classic Who reviews:

http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/tvshow/doctor-who-classic,186/

Chap raises an interesting point re: "inelegant plotting," although do admire the general anarchy of it.

his best Who scripts are all from the Rusty era

This however I totally disagree with -- thought "Big Bang" and the Christmas ep were as good as anything he's done.

Eleventh Hour was splendid

Indeed it was, but not Empty Child or Blink splendid IMO.

best "new Doctor" episode ever - it had a different job to do than a Blink or Empty Child

I think the Moffat scripts from RTD's era are more well thought of because their quality stood out in relief to some of the crap episodes that surrounded them, and that's not the case now because episodes are more consistently decent. If that makes sense.

Also he could concentrate on one story a year.

Moffatt's also changed the format to have more through-season continuity (Bad Wolf nonsense aside), which makes single episodes less able to stand completely out

There have been reports of budget cuts being behind the BBC’s decision not to air a full season of Doctor Who during 2012—

Absolute nonsense. First of all, we are airing in 2012. The only thing that’s happening is that we’re moving a bit later...There’s lots of reasons for that that will become clear quite soon...It is certainly not a reduced episode count. Do you think the BBC would really let that happen? With an average audience of 10 million?…Doctor Who’s international profile is huge. It’s never been more successful. You’re not going to reduce a show like this. The opposite is going to happen, in fact.

Daily Beast interview with Moffatt

Wow, the interviewer must be a dullard that takes tigerbeatdown seriously.

Well, that sucked.

explains why it took a whole hour for this thread to reappear

shut up, hitler.

i enjoyed it (as per) - loved the fan continuity baiting - not so sure what it means in the arc of things.

the numskulls robot reminded me of when i watched the sontaran experiment as a teeny. there's a sequence where the sontaran was watching the humans on a monitor via a camera that's in a pendant round one fella's neck. the way the pendant lay on his chest i thought the sontaran was inside the man.

heartbroken about the missed opportunity for some sort of who/'allo 'allo crossover episode :(

Aside from being reminiscent of Meet Dave, this was really quite good!

I enjoyed it, but I did watch it with someone who hasn't seen much of the Matt Smith series and he was very confused indeed.

What happened to Hitler in the end?

He's still in the closet. OH NOES GAY AGENDAR

I like you, Doctor Who episode "Let's Kill Hitler".

Aside from being reminiscent of Meet Dave, this was really quite good!

Yes, wtf was up with that. I never thought I would have to be reminded of Meet Dave ever again in my life, and yet here we are.

says a lot more about your previous life choices than this episode tbh

liked it a lot, though I wondered if the slightly odd feeling of adding a new best pal to amy/rory's past was deliberate--like, was this an actual new timeline being formed (and as reiterated by one little person, "time can be rewritten").

Torn between being really impressed and sort of bored by the whole fanwankery. Also, good move making it about Hitler for a whole 17 seconds, that didn't waste a massive opportunity or anything.

I think I'm just fatigued by what apparently is a 50th anniversary story arc going on WAAAAAAAAAY too long.

Didn't need half an hour of panto Hitler after panto Nixon and panto Churchill.

Moffatt's said that next year will be back to more self-contained eps, so I think you're ia-ing that one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f9yKkwx1j1Y

Excellent choice of some shots there - Ian dancing from The Chase, Zoe on the exploded TARDIS from The Mind Robber, the cleaner from The Green Death, Tom's alium blow-job from Creature From The Pit, the poorest quality Sea Devil from Warriors Of The Deep, A Fix With The Sontarans...

Really don't agree with those who see Hitler being in it for a few minutes being a wasted opportunity. The Doctor can't stop Hitler or WWII so there's not much scope for a story there. We don't need a portentous episode about the horrors of Nazi Germany. Indeed, that could end up being in bad taste. Much better to have Rory punch Hitler out and River take the piss out of the Wehrmacht with her gay gypsy bar mitzvah gag. Mel Brooks would surely approve.
The episode was tremendously good fun and dealt with all the continuity stuff with wit and panache.

OTM. I thought using Hitler as an excuse for 5mins of throwaway comedy was great, and probably the only thing they could have done with him. You can't really get away with replacing Hitler with an alien or making him an accomplice.

Was about to shout 'fuck off' at the TV when River unleashed the Tardis energy on the dead Doctor, until I remembered that was still regeneration energy, so they just about got away with that one. Loved the robotic jellyfish antibody enforcers.

Those justice enforcers will be back though. They take war criminals at the end of their timeline, maybe the Doctor can cheat death by, erm, committing an atrocity and being grabbed at the last minute. Okay maybe not.

Nobody seems to have mentioned the Star Trek nod with the justice enforcers? Not just in the costumes, but the way it took the piss out of the Federation's sense of moral superiority.